E4042v6 Volume�II  Revision � II  0 Table of Contents Annexure 2.1- A Gist of Policies……………………………………………………….…2 Annexure 4.1- Secondary Data LGC...……………………………………………..…....54 Annexure 4.2 - Secondary Data Haidergarh……………………………………………..96 Annexure 4.3: Details of Main Canals & Ground Water in LGC…………………..….127 Annexure 4.4: Year wise Surface Water Quality Status……………………………….132 Annexure 5.1: Findings of FGD..………………………………………………………137 Annexure 6.2 A: A summary of various Govt. Policies and Orders…………………...183 1 Annexure 2.1- Policies and Regulatory Framework 2 Constitutional provisions - The Constitution of India articulates a direct commitment to environmental protection, as directive principle under Article 48-A of Indian Constitution, which stipulates that the "state shall endeavor to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard the forests and wildlife of the country". Under fundamental duties of citizens, Article 51-A (g) stipulates “It shall be the duty of every citizen of India to protect and improve the natural environment, including forests, lakes, rivers and wildlife and to have compassion for living creatures�. The directive principle under Articles 49 and 51-A (f) also recognizes the importance of protecting the sites of cultural heritage as part of the total environment. Thus, the Indian constitution does provide the necessary support for framing and enforcement of environmental legislation. Schedule VII of the Indian Constitution classifies the various legislative subjects into three categories, (a) union list, (b) state list and, (c) concurrent list. The legislations in the union list are enacted by Indian parliament, while state legislatures are empowered to enact necessary legislations for the state list. The concurrent list specifies the subjects that are to be looked after jointly by the central and state governments. The principal legislations for environmental management are passed by the Indian Parliament, and the Government of India has enunciated legislations for protection of the environment. There are a number of key environment Acts, rules and notifications at national level; state and district levels which are involved for implementation of environmental and social safeguards. National Water Policy (NWP) - The National Water Policy (NWP), first adopted in September, 1987 by the GoI, has emphasized the need for integrated water resources management in a basin context. This policy has been reviewed and updated in 2002 in response to a number of new issues that have emerged subsquently. Although para 5 of NWP mentions about ecology, it accords low priority to it but indirectly recognises water use for fresh water� ecosystems. It states that, “Preservation of the quality of environment and the ecological balance should be a primary consideration. It further states that, adverse impact(s) on the environment should be minimised and should be offset by adequate compensatory measures. On resettlement and rehabilitation it speaks of the need of a “skeletal national policy� and would like states to evolve their own detailed policies. The revised National Water Policy (MoWR, GoI) has highlighted that water is scare resource and a part of eco-system have to be managed in an integrated and environmentally sustainable manner adopting basin approach. The salient points of the National Water Policy are highlighted in Box 2.1. There are also several sections covering aspects of flood control and management, water conservation, drought-prone area development, etc., besides institutional mechanism, private sector participation and participatory approach to water resources management. 3 Box 2.1: National Water Policy 2002 – Salient Points - Water is a scarce and precious national resource to be planned, developed and conserved and managed as such, and on an integrated and environmentally sound basis, keeping in view the socio-economic aspects and needs of the States. - Water is part of a larger ecological system. Realising the importance and scarcity attached to fresh water, it has to be treated as an essential environment for sustaining all life forms. - Water resources development and management will have to be planned for a hydrological unit such as drainage basin as a whole or for a sub-basin, multi-sectored, taking into account surface and ground water for sustainable use incorporating quantity and quality aspects as well as environmental considerations. - There should be an integrated and multi-disciplinary approach to the planning, formulation, clearance and implementation of projects, including catchments area treatment and management, environmental and ecological aspects, the rehabilitation of affected people and command area development. - The drainage system should form an integral part of any irrigation project right from planning stage - The detrimental environmental consequences of over-exploitation of ground water need to be effectively prevented by the Central and State Governments. - There should be a close integration of water-use and land-use policies. - Water allocation in an irrigation system should be done with due regard to equity and social justice. - Reclamation of water logged/ saline affected land by scientific and cost effective methods should form a part of command area development programme. - Effluents should be treated to acceptable levels and standards before discharging them in to natural streams and that minimum flow should be ensured in the perennial streams for maintaining ecology and social considerations. - Special efforts should be made to investigate and formulate projects either in, or for the benefit of, areas inhabited by tribal or other socially disadvantaged groups such as socially weak, scheduled castes and scheduled tribes. UP State Water Policy - Uttar Pradesh Box 2.2: Uttar Pradesh State Water Policy adopted a progressive State Water Policy in (1999) – Key Principles Dec 1999, initiating much-needed radical reforms in the way the water resources of the - Ensure ecological and environmental balance while developing water resources state are managed and the proposed program - Promote equity and social justice among and project seeks to initiate the individuals and groups of users in water implementation of this policy in the selected resource allocation and management areas. The Policy is also important from an - Provide a substantive legal framework for environmental and social viewpoint and management, and a Management Information System (M.I.S.) for effective monitoring of includes references to: policy implementation 1. Adequate provision for ecological, navigational, recreational and other purposes; 2. Key concern about the quality of water, its protection against pollution and safeguards against 3. Water-related health hazards; 4. Focus on basic drinking water and sanitation needs; 5. Consideration of integrated river basin planning as a unit of development; 6. Focus on data, information and knowledge-base development for decision- making; 7. A special focus on resettlement and rehabilitation of affected persons; and, 8. Participatory Irrigation Management. The UP State Water Policy developed in consonance with the GoI National Water Policy of 1987 with an objective of (a) ensure preservation of scarce water resources, (b) optimize water resource utilization to bring about qualitative improvement in water 4 resource management which should include users' participation, (c) decentralize authority to manage water resources, (d) promote equity and social justice among individuals and groups of users in water resource allocation and management, (e) provide a substantive legal framework to manage and develop adequate information and a knowledge base to promote research and training facilities in the water sector, and (f) to provide mechanisms for the resolution of conflicts between various users. The key principles underlying State Water Policy in relation to the social and environmental safeguards are highlighted in Box 2.2. Among the important provisions included in this policy document are: (a) Ecology & Environment - All water resource projects should be examined from an ecological and environmental standpoint and, wherever needed, remedial measures should form a part of the project itself and be implemented along with it. A minimum flow in the natural streams should be allowed; (b) Water Harvesting - Water harvesting should be given consideration in planning water resources. Viable projects, especially in scarce ground water areas, should be investigated and implemented to increase surface water availability; this would also help in recharging ground water; (c) Ecological Health and other needs - All water resources projects shall give due regard to “ecological health� and other needs for which adequate provision shall be made on a priority basis. The Policy includes an outline of an Action Plan focussing on the need for enactment of legislation to regulate surface and ground water resources and their conjunctive use, and to provide for other institutional/administrative reforms, including creation of a State Water Board. UP Agricultural Policy - The Agricultural policy, formulated by the Government of Uttar Pradesh is an important initiative that addresses the water availability issues in the state. These documents stress the need for: (a) conservation and conjunctive use of surface and groundwater; (b) watershed management and rainwater harvesting; and (c) to address depletion of groundwater levels and soil and water conservation. Recent government reform initiatives are designed to address the entire technical and institutional gamut of water resource sector in Uttar Pradesh. Policy framework for the environmental and natural resource safeguards Policy framework for environmental and natural resources safeguard consists of National Environment Policy 2006, National Forest Policy and UP State Forest Policy described below. GOI National Environment Policy - In 2006, the National Environment Policy was formulated and placed on the web for wide circulation. The main features that appear new in the proposed policy are summarized below: 1. The definition of environment has been enlarged to include all entities, natural or manmade, external to oneself, which provide value, now or perhaps in the future, to humankind. 2. Foundational aspirations have been addressed, which are (i) that human beings should be able to enjoy a decent quality of life; (ii) that humanity should become capable of respecting the finiteness of the biosphere; and (iii) that neither the 5 aspiration for the good life, nor the recognition of biophysical limits should preclude the search for greater justice in the world. The principles of good governance, viz., transparency, rationality, accountability, reduction in time and costs and participation of stakeholders, have been incorporated in the action points. 4. Mainstreaming environment in all activities has been explicitly emphasized. 5. Responsibilities of the state and the citizens have been affirmed in the light of the amendments introducing fundamental duties in the Constitution of India. 6. International commitments on global climate change, stratospheric ozone depletion, transfer of hazardous wastes and loss of biodiversity have been specifically mentioned. 7. Certain new principles for environmental management have been included in the policy, some of them based on judicial interpretations. These include: - The precautionary approach - Principle of polluter pays: general and strict liability of the polluter - Economic value of services of environmental resources - Priority for irreplaceable entities, e.g., Taj Mahal and the tiger - Equity, both intra-and inter-generational - Civil liability for environmental damage - State as trustee (not owner) of all natural resources - Standards should be set in the context of society and economy National Forest Policy - The principal aim of the Forest Policy is to ensure environmental stability and maintenance of ecological balance including atmospheric equilibrium which is vital for sustenance of all life forms, human, animal and plant. The basic objectives that govern the National Forest Policy are the following: 1. Maintenance of environmental stability through preservation and, where necessary, restoration of the ecological balance that has been adversely disturbed by serious depletion of the forests of the country. 2. Conserving the natural heritage of the country by preserving the remaining natural forests with their vast variety of flora and fauna that represent the remarkable biological diversity and genetic resources of the nation. 3. Checking soil erosion and denudation in the catchment areas of rivers, lakes, reservoirs in the "interest of soil and water conservation, for mitigating floods and droughts and degradation of reservoirs. 4. Checking the extension of sand-dunes in the desert areas of Rajasthan and along the coastal tracts. 5. Increasing substantially the forest/tree cover in the country through immense afforestation and social forestry programmes, especially on all denuded, degraded and unproductive lands. 6. Meeting the requirements of the rural and tribal populations for fuel-wood, fodder, minor forest produce and small timber. 7. Increasing the productivity of forests to meet essential national needs. 8. Encouraging efficient utilisation of forest produce and substitution of wood. 9. Creating a massive people's movement with the involvement of women for achieving these objectives and to minimize pressure on existing forests. Essentials of forest management as outlined in the National forest Policy include: (i) Existing forests and forest lands should be fully protected and their productivity improved. Forest and vegetal cover should be increased rapidly on hill slopes, in 6 catchment areas of rivers, lakes and reservoirs and ocean shores and, on semi-arid, and desert tracts; (ii) Diversion of good and productive agricultural lands to forestry should be discouraged in view of the need for increased food production; (iii) For the conservation of total biological diversity, the network of national parks, sanctuaries, biosphere reserves and other protected areas should be strengthened and extended adequately; (iv) Provision of sufficient fodder, fuel and pasture, especially in areas adjoining forests, is necessary in order to prevent depletion of forests beyond the sustainable limit (Since fuel wood continues to be the predominant source of energy in rural areas, the programme of afforestation should be intensified with special emphasis on augmenting fuel wood production to meet the requirements of rural people); (v) Minor forest produce provides sustenance to the tribal population, and to other communities residing in and around the forests. Such produce should be protected, improved and their production enhanced with due regard to generation of employment and income; and (vi)The forest policy states that strategies for area under forests, afforestation, social forestry & farm forestry, management of state forests, rights and concessions, diversion of forest lands for non-forest purposes, wildlife conservation, tribal people and forests, shifting cultivation, damage to forests from encroachments, fires and grazing, forest-based industries, forest extension, forestry education and forestry research should be prepared and implemented. State Forest Policy of Uttar Pradesh - The main objectives of the State Forest Policy are to ensure environmental and ecological stability in the state. The important features of the state forest policy are given below. 1. Improvement of existing natural and planted forests by conservation, development and scientific and thoughtful management; 2. Formulation and implementation of schemes of afforestation and soil conservation in different types of degraded lands of state viz. usar, khader, ravines and blank denuded forest areas; 3. Increase of tree cover by social and agro forestry plantations on community, institutional and private lands; 4. To endeavor to reduce siltation of water and reservoirs, and the effects of floods and drought through measures to control soil erosion and denudation of soil, and through water conservation in the catchment areas of rivers, lakes and rivers, lakes and reservoirs; 5. To take measures to increase the existing forest cover and it's productivity; 6. To reduce the gap between the demand and supply of forest produce for meeting the needs of fuel, fodder, minor forest produce and timber for rural poor and tribal; 7. To reduce the biotic pressure on forests by proper utilization of timber and other forest products, and by promoting the use of alternate materials; 8. To prepare and implement strategies for conservation of biodiversity and wild life in the state; and 9. To promote mass movements in the state, especially with the active participation of women and rural people residing near forest areas, so as to meet all the above objectives. The above policy objectives are primarily aimed at conserving the existing forest and increasing the forest cover in a number of ways. Utilisation of forests for economic gain has been defined as one of secondary objective of the state. 7 The GOI and the UP State also have a significant environmental policy framework for dealing with environmental impacts. However, there is a need to strengthen these environmental policy frameworks with respect to mitigate environmental impacts within the irrigated agriculture sector in UP. National Policy on Resettlement and Rehabilitation (R&R) - National policy on R&R deals with mitigating of potential losses and adverse impacts that may be coursed by the implementation of the project. The principle objective of this policy is to convert ‘all Project Affected Persons (PAP)’ to ‘Beneficiaries of the Project (BP)’ by adopting an adaptive and consultative resettlement planning process ensuring displaced and all persons affected by the project would be duly compensated for their losses at replacement cost and provided with rehabilitation measures and settlement and social upgrading programs to assist them to improve, or at least maintain, their pre-project living standards, income-earning capacity and wealth. Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006:- The ministry of Environment and Forest published an Environmental Impact Assessment Notification in 2006, which is given below:- (Published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, and Section 3, Sub-section (ii) MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS New Delhi 14th September, 2006 Notification S.O. 1533 Whereas, a draft notification under sub-rule (3) of Rule 5 of the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 for imposing certain restrictions and prohibitions on new projects or activities, or on the expansion or modernization of existing projects or activities based on their potential environmental impacts as indicated in the Schedule to the notification, being undertaken in any part of India1, unless prior environmental clearance has been accorded in accordance with the objectives of National Environment Policy as approved by the Union Cabinet on 18th May, 2006 and the procedure specified in the notification, by the Central Government or the State or Union territory Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA), to be constituted by the Central Government in consultation with the State Government or the Union territory Administration concerned under sub-section (3) of section 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 for the purpose of this notification, was published in the Gazette of India ,Extraordinary, Part II, section 3, sub-section (ii) vide number S.O. 1324 (E) dated the 15th September ,2005 inviting objections and suggestions from all persons likely to be affected thereby within a period of sixty days from the date on which copies of Gazette containing the said notification were made available to the public; And whereas, copies of the said notification were made available to the public on 15th September, 2005; And whereas, all objections and suggestions received in response to the above mentioned draft notification have been duly considered by the Central Government; 8 Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) and clause (v) of sub-section (2) of section 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, read with clause (d) of sub-rule (3) of rule 5 of the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 and in supersession of the notification number S.O. 60 (E) dated the 27th January, 1994, except in respect of things done or omitted to be done before such supersession, the Central Government hereby directs that on and from the date of its publication the required construction of new projects or activities or the expansion or modernization of existing projects or activities listed in the Schedule to this notification entailing capacity addition with change in process and or technology shall be undertaken in any part of India only after the prior environmental clearance from the Central Government or as the case may be, by the State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority, duly constituted by the Central Government under sub-section (3) of section 3 of the said Act, in accordance with the procedure specified hereinafter in this notification. ______________________ 1 Includes the territorial waters 2. Requirements of prior Environmental Clearance (EC):- The following projects or activities shall require prior environmental clearance from the concerned regulatory authority, which shall hereinafter referred to be as the Central Government in the Ministry of Environment and Forests for matters falling under Category ‘A’ in the Schedule and at State level the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) for matters falling under Category ‘B’ in the said Schedule, before any construction work, or preparation of land by the project management except for securing the land, is started on the project or activity: (i) All new projects or activities listed in the Schedule to this notification; (ii) Expansion and modernization of existing projects or activities listed in the Schedule to this notification with addition of capacity beyond the limits specified for the concerned sector, that is, projects or activities which cross the threshold limits given in the Schedule, after expansion or modernization; (iii) Any change in product - mix in an existing manufacturing unit included in Schedule beyond the specified range. 3. State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority:- (1) A State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority hereinafter referred to as the SEIAA shall be constituted by the Central Government under sub-section (3) of section 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 comprising of three Members including a Chairman and a Member – Secretary to be nominated by the State Government or the Union territory Administration concerned. (2) The Member-Secretary shall be a serving officer of the concerned State Government or Union territory administration familiar with environmental laws. (3) The other two Members shall be either a professional or expert fulfilling the eligibility criteria given in Appendix VI to this notification. (4) One of the specified Members in sub-paragraph (3) above who is an expert in the Environmental Impact Assessment process shall be the Chairman of the SEIAA. 9 (5) The State Government or Union territory Administration shall forward the names of the Members and the Chairman referred in sub- paragraph 3 to 4 above to the Central Government and the Central Government shall constitute the SEIAA as an authority for the purposes of this notification within thirty days of the date of receipt of the names. (6) The non-official Member and the Chairman shall have a fixed term of three years (from the date of the publication of the notification by the Central Government constituting the authority). (7) All decisions of the SEIAA shall be unanimous and taken in a meeting. 4. Categorization of projects and activities:- (i) All projects and activities are broadly categorized in to two categories - Category A and Category B, based on the spatial extent of potential impacts and potential impacts on human health and natural and man made resources. (ii) All projects or activities included as Category ‘A’ in the Schedule, including expansion and modernization of existing projects or activities and change in product mix, shall require prior environmental clearance from the Central Government in the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) on the recommendations of an Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) to be constituted by the Central Government for the purposes of this notification; (iii) All projects or activities included as Category ‘B’ in the Schedule, including expansion and modernization of existing projects or activities as specified in sub paragraph (ii) of paragraph 2, or change in product mix as specified in sub paragraph (iii) of paragraph 2, but excluding those which fulfill the General Conditions (GC) stipulated in the Schedule, will require prior environmental clearance from the State/Union territory Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA). The SEIAA shall base its decision on the recommendations of a State or Union territory level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) as to be constituted for in this notification. In the absence of a duly constituted SEIAA or SEAC, a Category ‘B’ project shall be treated as a Category ‘A’ project; 5. Screening, Scoping and Appraisal Committees:- The same Expert Appraisal Committees (EACs) at the Central Government and SEACs (hereinafter referred to as the (EAC) and (SEAC) at the State or the Union territory level shall screen, scope and appraise projects or activities in Category ‘A’ and Category ‘B’ respectively. EAC and SEAC’s shall meet at least once every month. (a) The composition of the EAC shall be as given in Appendix VI. The SEAC at the State or the Union territory level shall be constituted by the Central Government in consultation with the concerned State Government or the Union territory Administration with identical composition; (b) The Central Government may, with the prior concurrence of the concerned State Governments or the Union territory Administrations, constitutes one SEAC for more than one State or Union territory for reasons of administrative convenience and cost; (c) The EAC and SEAC shall be reconstituted after every three years; 10 (d) The authorised members of the EAC and SEAC, concerned, may inspect any site(s) connected with the project or activity in respect of which the prior environmental clearance is sought, for the purposes of screening or scoping or appraisal, with prior notice of at least seven days to the applicant, who shall provide necessary facilities for the inspection; (e) The EAC and SEACs shall function on the principle of collective responsibility. The Chairperson shall endeavour to reach a consensus in each case, and if consensus cannot be reached, the view of the majority shall prevail. 6. Application for Prior Environmental Clearance (EC):- An application seeking prior environmental clearance in all cases shall be made in the prescribed Form 1 annexed herewith and Supplementary Form 1A, if applicable, as given in Appendix II, after the identification of prospective site(s) for the project and/or activities to which the application relates, before commencing any construction activity, or preparation of land, at the site by the applicant. The applicant shall furnish, along with the application, a copy of the pre-feasibility project report except that, in case of construction projects or activities (item 8 of the Schedule) in addition to Form 1 and the Supplementary Form 1A, a copy of the conceptual plan shall be provided, instead of the pre-feasibility report. 7. Stages in the Prior Environmental Clearance (EC) Process for New Projects:- 7(i) The environmental clearance process for new projects will comprise of a maximum of four stages, all of which may not apply to particular cases as set forth below in this notification. These four stages in sequential order are:-  Stage (1) Screening (Only for Category ‘B’ projects and activities)  Stage (2) Scoping  Stage (3) Public Consultation  Stage (4) Appraisal I. Stage (1) - Screening: In case of Category ‘B’ projects or activities, this stage will entail the scrutiny of an application seeking prior environmental clearance made in Form 1 by the concerned State level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) for determining whether or not the project or activity requires further environmental studies for preparation of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for its appraisal prior to the grant of environmental clearance depending up on the nature and location specificity of the project . The projects requiring an Environmental Impact Assessment report shall be termed Category ‘B1’ and remaining projects shall be termed Category ‘B2’ and will not require an Environment Impact Assessment report. For categorization of projects into B1 or B2 except item 8 (b), the Ministry of Environment and Forests shall issue appropriate guidelines from time to time. II. Stage (2) - Scoping: (i) “Scoping�: refers to the process by which the Expert Appraisal Committee in the case of Category ‘A’ projects or activities, and State level Expert Appraisal Committee in the case of Category ‘B1’ projects or activities, including applications for expansion and/or modernization and/or change in product mix of existing projects or activities, determine detailed and comprehensive Terms Of Reference (TOR) addressing all relevant environmental concerns for the preparation of an Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Report in respect of the project or activity for which prior environmental clearance is sought. The Expert Appraisal Committee or State level Expert Appraisal Committee concerned shall determine the Terms of Reference on 11 the basis of the information furnished in the prescribed application Form1/Form 1A including Terns of Reference proposed by the applicant, a site visit by a sub- group of Expert Appraisal Committee or State level Expert Appraisal Committee concerned only if considered necessary by the Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee concerned, Terms of Reference suggested by the applicant if furnished and other information that may be available with the Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee concerned. All projects and activities listed as Category ‘B’ in Item 8 of the Schedule (Construction/Township/Commercial Complexes /Housing) shall not require Scoping and will be appraised on the basis of Form 1/ Form 1A and the conceptual plan. (ii) The Terms of Reference (TOR) shall be conveyed to the applicant by the Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee as concerned within sixty days of the receipt of Form 1. In the case of Category A Hydroelectric projects Item 1(c) (i) of the Schedule the Terms of Reference shall be conveyed along with the clearance for pre-construction activities .If the Terms of Reference are not finalized and conveyed to the applicant within sixty days of the receipt of Form 1, the Terms of Reference suggested by the applicant shall be deemed as the final Terms of Reference approved for the EIA studies. The approved Terms of Reference shall be displayed on the website of the Ministry of Environment and Forests and the concerned State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority. (iii) Applications for prior environmental clearance may be rejected by the regulatory authority concerned on the recommendation of the EAC or SEAC concerned at this stage itself. In case of such rejection, the decision together with reasons for the same shall be communicated to the applicant in writing within sixty days of the receipt of the application. III. Stage (3) - Public Consultation: (i) “Public Consultation� refers to the process by which the concerns of local affected persons and others who have plausible stake in the environmental impacts of the project or activity are ascertained with a view to taking into account all the material concerns in the project or activity design as appropriate. All Category ‘A’ and Category B1 projects or activities shall undertake Public Consultation, except the following:- (a) modernization of irrigation projects (item 1(c) (ii) of the Schedule). (b) all projects or activities located within industrial estates or parks (item 7(c) of the Schedule) approved by the concerned authorities, and which are not disallowed in such approvals. (c) expansion of Roads and Highways (item 7 (f) of the Schedule) which do not involve any further acquisition of land. (d) all Building /Construction projects/Area Development projects and Townships (item 8). (e) all Category ‘B2’ projects and activities. (f) all projects or activities concerning national defence and security or involving other strategic considerations as determined by the Central Government. (ii) The Public Consultation shall ordinarily have two components comprising of:- (a) a public hearing at the site or in its close proximity- district wise, to be carried out in the manner prescribed in Appendix IV, for ascertaining concerns of local affected persons; (b) obtain responses in writing from other concerned persons having a plausible stake in the environmental aspects of the project or activity. 12 (iii) the public hearing at, or in close proximity to, the site(s) in all cases shall be conducted by the State Pollution Control Board (SPCB) or the Union territory Pollution Control Committee (UTPCC) concerned in the specified manner and forward the proceedings to the regulatory authority concerned within 45(forty five ) of a request to the effect from the applicant. (iv) in case the State Pollution Control Board or the Union territory Pollution Control Committee concerned does not undertake and complete the public hearing within the specified period, and/or does not convey the proceedings of the public hearing within the prescribed period directly to the regulatory authority concerned as above, the regulatory authority shall engage another public agency or authority which is not subordinate to the regulatory authority, to complete the process within a further period of forty five days,. (v) If the public agency or authority nominated under the sub paragraph (iii) above reports to the regulatory authority concerned that owing to the local situation, it is not possible to conduct the public hearing in a manner which will enable the views of the concerned local persons to be freely expressed, it shall report the facts in detail to the concerned regulatory authority, which may, after due consideration of the report and other reliable information that it may have, decide that the public consultation in the case need not include the public hearing. (vi) For obtaining responses in writing from other concerned persons having a plausible stake in the environmental aspects of the project or activity, the concerned regulatory authority and the State Pollution Control Board (SPCB) or the Union territory Pollution Control Committee (UTPCC) shall invite responses from such concerned persons by placing on their website the Summary EIA report prepared in the format given in Appendix IIIA by the applicant along with a copy of the application in the prescribed form , within seven days of the receipt of a written request for arranging the public hearing . Confidential information including non-disclosable or legally privileged information involving Intellectual Property Right, source specified in the application shall not be placed on the web site. The regulatory authority concerned may also use other appropriate media for ensuring wide publicity about the project or activity. The regulatory authority shall, however, make available on a written request from any concerned person the Draft EIA report for inspection at a notified place during normal office hours till the date of the public hearing. All the responses received as part of this public consultation process shall be forwarded to the applicant through the quickest available means. (vii) After completion of the public consultation, the applicant shall address all the material environmental concerns expressed during this process, and make appropriate changes in the draft EIA and EMP. The final EIA report, so prepared, shall be submitted by the applicant to the concerned regulatory authority for appraisal. The applicant may alternatively submit a supplementary report to draft EIA and EMP addressing all the concerns expressed during the public consultation. IV. Stage (4) - Appraisal: (i) Appraisal means the detailed scrutiny by the Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee of the application and other documents like the Final EIA report, outcome of the public consultations including public hearing proceedings, submitted by the applicant to the regulatory authority concerned for grant of environmental clearance. This appraisal shall be made by Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee concerned in a transparent manner in a proceeding to which the applicant shall be invited for furnishing necessary clarifications in person or through an authorized representative. On conclusion of this proceeding, the Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee concerned shall make categorical recommendations to the regulatory authority concerned either for grant of prior environmental clearance on stipulated terms and 13 conditions, or rejection of the application for prior environmental clearance, together with reasons for the same. (ii) The appraisal of all projects or activities which are not required to undergo public consultation, or submit an Environment Impact Assessment report, shall be carried out on the basis of the prescribed application Form 1 and Form 1A as applicable, any other relevant validated information available and the site visit wherever the same is considered as necessary by the Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee concerned. (iii) The appraisal of an application be shall be completed by the Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee concerned within sixty days of the receipt of the final Environment Impact Assessment report and other documents or the receipt of Form 1 and Form 1 A, where public consultation is not necessary and the recommendations of the Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee shall be placed before the competent authority for a final decision within the next fifteen days .The prescribed procedure for appraisal is given in Appendix V ; 7 (ii). Prior Environmental Clearance (EC) process for Expansion or Modernization or Change of product mix in existing projects: All applications seeking prior environmental clearance for expansion with increase in the production capacity beyond the capacity for which prior environmental clearance has been granted under this notification or with increase in either lease area or production capacity in the case of mining projects or for the modernization of an existing unit with increase in the total production capacity beyond the threshold limit prescribed in the Schedule to this notification through change in process and or technology or involving a change in the product –mix shall be made in Form I and they shall be considered by the concerned Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee within sixty days, who will decide on the due diligence necessary including preparation of EIA and public consultations and the application shall be appraised accordingly for grant of environmental clearance. 8. Grant or Rejection of Prior Environmental Clearance (EC): (i) The regulatory authority shall consider the recommendations of the EAC or SEAC concerned and convey its decision to the applicant within forty five days of the receipt of the recommendations of the Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee concerned or in other words within one hundred and five days of the receipt of the final Environment Impact Assessment Report, and where Environment Impact Assessment is not required, within one hundred and five days of the receipt of the complete application with requisite documents, except as provided below. (ii) The regulatory authority shall normally accept the recommendations of the Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee concerned. In cases where it disagrees with the recommendations of the Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee concerned, the regulatory authority shall request reconsideration by the Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee concerned within forty five days of the receipt of the recommendations of the Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee concerned while stating the reasons for the disagreement. An intimation of this decision shall be simultaneously conveyed to the applicant. The Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee concerned, in turn, shall consider the observations of the regulatory authority and furnish its views on the same within a further period of sixty days. The decision of the regulatory authority after considering the views 14 of the Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee concerned shall be final and conveyed to the applicant by the regulatory authority concerned within the next thirty days. (iii) In the event that the decision of the regulatory authority is not communicated to the applicant within the period specified in sub-paragraphs (i) or (ii) above, as applicable, the applicant may proceed as if the environment clearance sought for has been granted or denied by the regulatory authority in terms of the final recommendations of the Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee concerned. (iv) On expiry of the period specified for decision by the regulatory authority under paragraph (i) and (ii) above, as applicable, the decision of the regulatory authority, and the final recommendations of the Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee concerned shall be public documents. (v) Clearances from other regulatory bodies or authorities shall not be required prior to receipt of applications for prior environmental clearance of projects or activities, or screening, or scoping, or appraisal, or decision by the regulatory authority concerned, unless any of these is sequentially dependent on such clearance either due to a requirement of law, or for necessary technical reasons. (vi) Deliberate concealment and/or submission of false or misleading information or data which is material to screening or scoping or appraisal or decision on the application shall make the application liable for rejection, and cancellation of prior environmental clearance granted on that basis. Rejection of an application or cancellation of a prior environmental clearance already granted, on such ground, shall be decided by the regulatory authority, after giving a personal hearing to the applicant, and following the principles of natural justice. 9. Validity of Environmental Clearance (EC): The “Validity of Environmental Clearance� is meant the period from which a prior environmental clearance is granted by the regulatory authority, or may be presumed by the applicant to have been granted under sub paragraph (iv) of paragraph 7 above, to the start of production operations by the project or activity, or completion of all construction operations in case of construction projects (item 8 of the Schedule), to which the application for prior environmental clearance refers. The prior environmental clearance granted for a project or activity shall be valid for a period of ten years in the case of River Valley projects (item 1(c) of the Schedule), project life as estimated by Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee subject to a maximum of thirty years for mining projects and five years in the case of all other projects and activities. However, in the case of Area Development projects and Townships [item 8(b)], the validity period shall be limited only to such activities as may be the responsibility of the applicant as a developer. This period of validity may be extended by the regulatory authority concerned by a maximum period of five years provided an application is made to the regulatory authority by the applicant within the validity period, together with an updated Form 1, and Supplementary Form 1A, for Construction projects or activities (item 8 of the Schedule). In this regard the regulatory authority may also consult the Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee as the case may be. 15 10. Post Environmental Clearance Monitoring: (i) It shall be mandatory for the project management to submit half-yearly compliance reports in respect of the stipulated prior environmental clearance terms and conditions in hard and soft copies to the regulatory authority concerned, on 1st June and 1st December of each calendar year. (ii) All such compliance reports submitted by the project management shall be public documents. Copies of the same shall be given to any person on application to the concerned regulatory authority. The latest such compliance report shall also be displayed on the web site of the concerned regulatory authority. 11. Transferability of Environmental Clearance (EC): A prior environmental clearance granted for a specific project or activity to an applicant may be transferred during its validity to another legal person entitled to undertake the project or activity on application by the transferor, or by the transferee with a written “no objection� by the transferor, to, and by the regulatory authority concerned, on the same terms and conditions under which the prior environmental clearance was initially granted, and for the same validity period. No reference to the Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert Appraisal Committee concerned is necessary in such cases. 12. Operation of EIA Notification, 1994, till disposal of pending cases: From the date of final publication of this notification the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) notification number S.O.60 (E) dated 27th January, 1994 is hereby superseded, except in suppression of the things done or omitted to be done before such suppression to the extent that in case of all or some types of applications made for prior environmental clearance and pending on the date of final publication of this notification, the Central Government may relax any one or all provisions of this notification except the list of the projects or activities requiring prior environmental clearance in Schedule I , or continue operation of some or all provisions of the said notification, for a period not exceeding one year from the date of issue of this notification. [No. J-11013/56/2004-IA-II (I)] (R.CHANDRAMOHAN) JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA 16 17 SCHEDULE (See paragraph 2 and 7) LIST OF PROJECTS OR ACTIVITIES REQUIRING PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Category with threshold limit Conditions if Project or Activity any A B 1 Mining, extraction of natural resources and power generation (for a specified production capacity) (a) ( (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) 1 Mining of  50 ha. of mining lease area <50 ha General minerals  5 ha .of Condition shall Asbestos mining irrespective of mining lease apply mining area area. Note Mineral prospecting (not involving drilling) are exempted provided the concession areas have got previous clearance for physical survey 1(b) Offshore and All projects Note onshore oil and Exploration gas exploration, Surveys (not development & involving production drilling) are exempted provided the concession areas have got previous clearance for physical survey 1(c) River Valley (i)  50 MW hydroelectric (i) < 50 MW  General projects power generation; 25 MW Condition shall 18 (ii)  10,000 ha. of culturable hydroelectric apply command area power generation; (ii) < 10,000 ha. of culturable command area 1(d) Thermal Power  500 MW (coal/lignite/naphta < 500 MW General Plants & gas based); (coal/lignite/napt Condition shall  50 MW (Pet coke diesel and ha & gas based); apply all other fuels ) <50 MW  5MW (Pet coke ,diesel and all other fuels ) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 1(e) Nuclear power All projects - projects and processing of nuclear fuel 2 Primary Processing 2(a) Coal washeries  1 million ton/annum <1million ton/annum General Condition throughput of coal throughput of coal shall apply (If located within mining area the proposal shall be appraised together with the mining proposal) 2 (b) Mineral  0.1million < 0.1million General Condition beneficiation ton/annum mineral ton/annum mineral shall apply throughput throughput (Mining proposal with Mineral beneficiation shall be appraised together for grant of clearance) 19 3 Materials Production (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 3(a) Metallurgical a)Primary industries (ferrous metallurgical industry & non ferrous) All projects b) Sponge iron manufacturing Sponge iron General Condition ≥ 200TPD manufacturing shall apply for <200TPD Sponge iron manufacturing c)Secondary metallurgical Secondary processing industry metallurgical processing industry All toxic and heavy metal producing units i.)All toxic  20,000 tonnes andheavymetal /annum producing units <20,000 tonnes - /annum ii.)All other non –toxic secondary metallurgical processing industries >5000 tonnes/annum 3( b) Cement plants  1.0 million <1.0 million General Condition tonnes/annum tonnes/annum shall apply production capacity production capacity. All Stand alone grinding units 4 Materials Processing (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 4(a) Petroleum refining All projects - - industry 20 4(b) Coke oven plants 2,50,000 <2,50,000 & - tonnes/annum 25,000 - tonnes/annum 4(c ) Asbestos milling All projects - - and asbestos based products 4(d) Chlor-alkali 300 TPD production <300 TPD production Specific Condition industry capacityor a unit capacity shall apply located out side the and located within a notified industrial notified industrial No new Mercury area/ estate area/ estate Cell based plants will be permitted and existing units converting to membrane cell technology are exempted from this Notification 4(e) Soda ash Industry All projects - - 4(f) Leather/skin/hide New projects outside All new or expansion Specific condition processing the industrial area or of projects located shall apply industry expansion of existing within a notified units out side the industrial area/ estate industrial area 5 Manufacturing/Fabrication 5(a) Chemical All projects - - fertilizers 5(b) Pesticides industry All units producing - - and pesticide technical grade specific pesticides intermediates (excluding formulations) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 5(c) Petro-chemical All projects - - 21 complexes - (industries based on processing of petroleum fractions & natural gas and/or reforming to aromatics) 5(d) Manmade fibres Rayon Others General Condition manufacturing shall apply 5(e) Petrochemical Located out side the Located in a notified Specific Condition based processing notified industrial industrial area/ estate shall apply (processes other area/ estate than cracking & - reformation and not covered under the complexes) 5(f) Synthetic organic Located out side the Located in a notified Specific Condition chemicals industry notified industrial industrial area/ estate shall apply (dyes & dye area/ estate intermediates; bulk drugs and intermediates excluding drug formulations; synthetic rubbers; basic organic chemicals, other synthetic organic chemicals and chemical intermediates) 5(g) Distilleries (i)All Molasses based All Cane juice/non- General Condition distilleries molasses based shall apply distilleries – (ii) All Cane juice/ <30 KLD non-molasses based distilleries 30 KLD 22 5(h) Integrated paint - All projects General Condition industry shall apply (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 5(i) Pulp & paper Pulp manufacturing Paper manufacturing General Condition industry excluding and industry without pulp shall apply manufacturing of manufacturing paper from waste Pulp& Paper paper and manufacturing manufacture of industry paper from ready - pulp with out bleaching 5(j) Sugar Industry -  5000 tcd cane General Condition - crushing capacity shall apply 5(k) Induction/arc - All projects General Condition furnaces/cupola - shall apply furnaces 5TPH or more 6 Service Sectors 6(a) Oil & gas All projects - transportation pipe - line (crude and refinery/ petrochemical products), passing through national parks /sanctuaries/coral reefs /ecologically sensitive areas including LNG Terminal (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 6(b) Isolated storage & - All projects General Condition handling of shall apply hazardous chemicals (As per threshold planning 23 quantity indicated in column 3 of schedule 2 & 3 of MSIHC Rules 1989 amended 2000) 7 Physical Infrastructure including Environmental Services 7(a) Air ports All projects - - 7(b) All ship breaking All projects - - yards including ship breaking units 7(c) Industrial estates/ If at least one industry Industrial estates Special condition parks/ complexes/ in the proposed housing at least one shall apply areas, export industrial estate falls Category B industry and processing Zones under the Category A, area <500 ha. Note: (EPZs), Special entire industrial area Industrial Estate Economic Zones shall be treated as of area below 500 (SEZs), Biotech Category A, ha. and not Parks, Leather irrespective of the housing any Complexes. area. industry of category A or B Industrial estates with does not require area greater than 500 Industrial estates of area> clearance. ha. and housing at 500 ha. and not housing least one Category B any industry belonging to industry. Category A or B. 7(d) Common All integrated facilities All facilities having land General hazardous waste having incineration fill only Condition shall treatment, storage &landfill or apply and disposal incineration alone facilities (TSDFs) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 7(e) Ports, Harbours  5 million TPA of < 5 million TPA of cargo General Condition cargo handling capacity and/or handling shall apply capacity ports/ harbours 10,000 (excluding fishing harbours) TPA of fish handling capacity 7(f) Highways i) New National High i) New State High ways; General ways; and and Condition shall 24 apply ii) Expansion of ii) Expansion of National National High ways / State Highways greater greater than 30 KM, than 30 km involving involving additional additional right of way right of way greater greater than 20m than 20m involving involving land land acquisition and acquisition. passing through more than one State. 7(g) Aerial ropeways All projects General Condition shall apply 7(h) Common Effluent All projects General Treatment Plants Condition shall (CETPs) apply 7(i) Common All projects General Municipal Solid Condition shall Waste apply Management Facility (CMSWMF) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 8 Building /Construction projects/Area Development projects and Townships 8(a) Building and ≥20000 sq.mtrs and #(built up area for Construction <1,50,000 sq.mtrs. of covered projects built-up area# construction; in the case of facilities open to the sky, it will be the activity area ) 8(b) Townships and Covering an area ≥ 50 ha ++All projects Area Development and or built up area under Item 8(b) projects. ≥1,50,000 sq .mtrs ++ shall be appraised as Category B1 Note:- General Condition (GC): Any project or activity specified in Category ‘B’ will be treated as Category A, if located in whole or in part within 10 km from the boundary of: (i) Protected Areas notified under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, (ii) Critically Polluted areas as notified by the Central Pollution Control Board 25 from time to time, (iii) Notified Eco-sensitive areas, (iv) inter-State boundaries and international boundaries. Specific Condition (SC): If any Industrial Estate/Complex / Export processing Zones /Special Economic Zones/Biotech Parks / Leather Complex with homogeneous type of industries such as Items 4(d), 4(f), 5(e), 5(f), or those Industrial estates with pre –defined set of activities (not necessarily homogeneous, obtains prior environmental clearance, individual industries including proposed industrial housing within such estates /complexes will not be required to take prior environmental clearance, so long as the Terms and Conditions for the industrial estate/complex are complied with (Such estates/complexes must have a clearly identified management with the legal responsibility of ensuring adherence to the Terms and Conditions of prior environmental clearance, who may be held responsible for violation of the same throughout the life of the complex/estate). APPENDIX I (See paragraph – 6) FORM 1 (I) Basic Information Name of the Project: Location / site alternatives under consideration: Size of the Project: * Expected cost of the project: Contact Information: Screening Category:  Capacity corresponding to sectoral activity (such as production capacity for manufacturing, mining lease area and production capacity for mineral production, area for mineral exploration, length for linear transport infrastructure, generation capacity for power generation etc.,) (II) Activity 1. Construction, operation or decommissioning of the Project involving actions, which will cause physical changes in the locality (topography, land use, changes in water bodies, etc.) 26 Details thereof (with approximate quantities /rates, S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No wherever possible) with source of information data 1.1 Permanent or temporary change in land use, land cover or topography including increase in intensity of land use (with respect to local land use plan) 1.2 Clearance of existing land, vegetation and buildings? 1.3 Creation of new land uses? 1.4 Pre-construction investigations e.g. bore houses, soil testing? 1.5 Construction works? 1.6 Demolition works? 1.7 Temporary sites used for construction works or housing of construction workers? 1.8 Above ground buildings, structures or earthworks including linear structures, cut and fill or excavations 1.9 Underground works including mining or tunneling? 1.10 Reclamation works? 1.11 Dredging? 1.12 Offshore structures? 1.13 Production and manufacturing processes? 1.14 Facilities for storage of goods or materials? 1.15 Facilities for treatment or disposal of solid waste or liquid effluents? 1.16 Facilities for long term housing of operational workers? 1.17 New road, rail or sea traffic during construction or operation? 27 1.18 New road, rail, air waterborne or other transport infrastructure including new or altered routes and stations, ports, airports etc? 1.19 Closure or diversion of existing transport routes or infrastructure leading to changes in traffic movements? 1.20 New or diverted transmission lines or pipelines? 1.21 Impoundment, damming, culverting, realignment or other changes to the hydrology of watercourses or aquifers? 1.22 Stream crossings? 1.23 Abstraction or transfers of water form ground or surface waters? 1.24 Changes in water bodies or the land surface affecting drainage or run-off? 1.25 Transport of personnel or materials for construction, operation or decommissioning? 1.26 Long-term dismantling or decommissioning or restoration works? 1.27 Ongoing activity during decommissioning which could have an impact on the environment? 1.28 Influx of people to an area in either temporarily or permanently? 1.29 Introduction of alien species? 1.30 Loss of native species or genetic diversity? 1.31 Any other actions? 28 2. Use of Natural resources for construction or operation of the Project (such as land, water, materials or energy, especially any resources which are non-renewable or in short supply): Details thereof (with approximate quantities /rates, wherever possible) with S.No. Information/checklist confirmation Yes/No source of information data 2.1 Land especially undeveloped or agricultural land (ha) 2.2 Water (expected source & competing users) unit: KLD 2.3 Minerals (MT) 2.4 Construction material – stone, aggregates, sand / soil (expected source MT) 2.5 Forests and timber (source – MT) 2.6 Energy including electricity and fuels (source, competing users) Unit: fuel (MT), energy (MW) 2.7 Any other natural resources (use appropriate standard units) 3. Use, storage, transport, handling or production of substances or materials, which could be harmful to human health or the environment or raise concerns about actual or perceived risks to human health. Details thereof (with approximate S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data 3.1 Use of substances or materials, which are hazardous (as per MSIHC rules) to human health or the environment (flora, fauna, and water supplies) 3.2 Changes in occurrence of disease or affect disease vectors (e.g. insect or water borne diseases) 3.3 Affect the welfare of people e.g. by changing living conditions? 3.4 Vulnerable groups of people who could be affected by the project e.g. hospital patients, children, the 29 elderly etc., 3.5 Any other causes 4. Production of solid wastes during construction or operation or decommissioning (MT/month) Details thereof (with approximate S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data 4.1 Spoil, overburden or mine wastes 4.2 Municipal waste (domestic and or commercial wastes) 4.3 Hazardous wastes (as per Hazardous Waste Management Rules) 4.4 Other industrial process wastes 4.5 Surplus product 4.6 Sewage sludge or other sludge from effluent treatment 4.7 Construction or demolition wastes 4.8 Redundant machinery or equipment 4.9 Contaminated soils or other materials 4.10 Agricultural wastes 4.11 Other solid wastes 5. Release of pollutants or any hazardous, toxic or noxious substances to air (Kg/hr) Details thereof (with approximate S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data 30 5.1 Emissions from combustion of fossil fuels from stationary or mobile sources 5.2 Emissions from production processes 5.3 Emissions from materials handling including storage or transport 5.4 Emissions from construction activities including plant and equipment 5.5 Dust or odours from handling of materials including construction materials, sewage and waste 5.6 Emissions from incineration of waste 5.7 Emissions from burning of waste in open air (e.g. slash materials, construction debris) 5.8 Emissions from any other sources 6. Generation of Noise and Vibration, and Emissions of Light and Heat: Yes/No Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation possible) with source of information data with source of information data 6.1 From operation of equipment e.g. engines, ventilation plant, crushers 6.2 From industrial or similar processes 6.3 From construction or demolition 6.4 From blasting or piling 6.5 From construction or operational traffic 6.6 From lighting or cooling systems 6.7 From any other sources 31 7. Risks of contamination of land or water from releases of pollutants into the ground or into sewers, surface waters, groundwater, coastal waters or the sea: Details thereof (with approximate S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data 7.1 From handling, storage, use or spillage of hazardous materials 7.2 From discharge of sewage or other effluents to water or the land (expected mode and place of discharge) 7.3 By deposition of pollutants emitted to air into the land or into water 7.4 From any other sources 7.5 Is there a risk of long term build up of pollutants in the environment from these sources? 8. Risk of accidents during construction or operation of the Project, which could affect human health or the environment Details thereof (with approximate S.No. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data 8.1 From explosions, spillages, fires etc from storage, handling, use or production of hazardous substances 8.2 From any other causes 8.3 Could the project be affected by natural disasters causing environmental damage (e.g. floods, earthquakes, landslides, cloudburst etc)? 32 9. Factors which should be considered (such as consequential development) which could lead to environmental effects or the potential for cumulative impacts with other existing or planned activities in the locality Details thereof (with approximate S. No. Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data 9.1 Lead to development of supporting. lities, ancillary development or development stimulated by the project which could have impact on the environment e.g.: • Supporting infrastructure (roads, power supply, waste or waste water treatment, etc.) • housing development • extractive industries • supply industries • other 9.2 Lead to after-use of the site, which could havean impact on the environment 9.3 Set a precedent for later developments 9.4 Have cumulative effects due to proximity to other existing or planned projects with similar effects (III) Environmental Sensitivity Aerial distance (within 15 S.No. Areas Name/ km.) Identity Proposed project location boundary 1 Areas protected under international conventions, national or local legislation for their ecological, landscape, cultural or other related value 33 2 Areas which are important or sensitive for ecological reasons - Wetlands, watercourses or other water bodies, coastal zone, biospheres, mountains, forests 3 Areas used by protected, important or sensitive species of flora or fauna for breeding, nesting, foraging, resting, over wintering, migration 4 Inland, coastal, marine or underground waters 5 State, National boundaries 6 Routes or facilities used by the public for access to recreation or other tourist, pilgrim areas 7 Defence installations 8 Densely populated or built-up area 9 Areas occupied by sensitive man-made land uses (hospitals, schools, places of worship, community facilities) 10 Areas containing important, high quality or scarce resources (ground water resources, surface resources, forestry, agriculture, fisheries, tourism, minerals) 11 Areas already subjected to pollution or environmental damage. (those where existing legal environmental standards are exceeded) 12 Areas susceptible to natural hazard which could cause the project to present environmental problems (earthquakes, subsidence, landslides, erosion, flooding or extreme or adverse climatic conditions) (IV). Proposed Terms of Reference for EIA studies 34 APPENDIX II (See paragraph 6) FORM-1 A (only for construction projects listed under item 8 of the Schedule) CHECK LIST OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Project proponents are required to provide full information and wherever necessary attach explanatory notes with the Form and submit along with proposed environmental management plan & monitoring programme) 1. LAND ENVIRONMENT (Attach panoramic view of the project site and the vicinity) 1.1. Will the existing landuse get significantly altered from the project that is not consistent with the surroundings? (Proposed landuse must conform to the approved Master Plan / Development Plan of the area. Change of landuse if any and the statutory approval from the competent authority be submitted). Attach Maps of (i) site location, (ii) surrounding features of the proposed site (within 500 meters) and (iii)the site (indicating levels & contours) to appropriate scales. If not available attach only conceptual plans. 1.2. List out all the major project requirements in terms of the land area, built up area, water consumption, power requirement, connectivity, community facilities, parking needs etc. 1.3. What are the likely impacts of the proposed activity on the existing facilities adjacent to the proposed site? (Such as open spaces, community facilities, details of the existing landuse, disturbance to the local ecology). 1.4. Will there be any significant land disturbance resulting in erosion, subsidence & instability? (Details of soil type, slope analysis, vulnerability to subsidence, seismicity etc may be given). 1.5. Will the proposal involve alteration of natural drainage systems? (Give details on a contour map showing the natural drainage near the proposed project site) 1.6. What are the quantities of earthwork involved in the construction activity-cutting, filling, reclamation etc. (Give details of the quantities of earthwork involved, transport of fill materials from outside the site etc.) 1.7. Give details regarding water supply, waste handling etc during the construction period. 1.8. Will the low lying areas & wetlands get altered? (Provide details of how low lying and wetlands are getting modified from the proposed activity) 35 1.9. Whether construction debris & waste during construction cause health hazard? (Give quantities of various types of wastes generated during construction including the construction labour and the means of disposal) 2. WATER ENVIRONMENT 2.1. Give the total quantity of water requirement for the proposed project with the breakup of requirements for various uses. How will the water requirement met? State the sources & quantities and furnish a water balance statement. 2.2. What is the capacity (dependable flow or yield) of the proposed source of water? 2.3. What is the quality of water required, in case, the supply is not from a municipal source? (Provide physical, chemical, biological characteristics with class of water quality) 2.4. How much of the water requirement can be met from the recycling of treated wastewater? (Give the details of quantities, sources and usage) 2.5. Will there be diversion of water from other users? (Please assess the impacts of the project on other existing uses and quantities of consumption) 2.6. What is the incremental pollution load from wastewater generated from the proposed activity? (Give details of the quantities and composition of wastewater generated from the proposed activity) 2.7. Give details of the water requirements met from water harvesting? Furnish details of the facilities created. 2.8. What would be the impact of the land use changes occurring due to the proposed project on the runoff characteristics (quantitative as well as qualitative) of the area in the post construction phase on a long term basis? Would it aggravate the problems of flooding or water logging in any way? 2.9. What are the impacts of the proposal on the ground water? (Will there be tapping of ground water; give the details of ground water table, recharging capacity, and approvals obtained from competent authority, if any) 2.10. What precautions/measures are taken to prevent the run-off from construction activities polluting land & aquifers? (Give details of quantities and the measures taken to avoid the adverse impacts) 2.11. How is the storm water from within the site managed?(State the provisions made to avoid flooding of the area, details of the drainage facilities provided along with a site layout indication contour levels) 36 2.12. Will the deployment of construction labourers particularly in the peak period lead to unsanitary conditions around the project site (Justify with proper explanation) 2.13. What on-site facilities are provided for the collection, treatment & safe disposal of sewage? (Give details of the quantities of wastewater generation, treatment capacities with technology & facilities for recycling and disposal) 2.14. Give details of dual plumbing system if treated waste used is used for flushing of toilets or any other use. 3. VEGETATION 3.1. Is there any threat of the project to the biodiversity? (Give a description of the local ecosystem with it’s unique features, if any) 3.2. Will the construction involve extensive clearing or modification of vegetation? (Provide a detailed account of the trees & vegetation affected by the project) 3.3. What are the measures proposed to be taken to minimize the likely impacts on important site features (Give details of proposal for tree plantation, landscaping, creation of water bodies etc along with a layout plan to an appropriate scale) 4. FAUNA 4.1. Is there likely to be any displacement of fauna- both terrestrial and aquatic or creation of barriers for their movement? Provide the details. 4.2. Any direct or indirect impacts on the avifauna of the area? Provide details. 4.3. Prescribe measures such as corridors, fish ladders etc to mitigate adverse impacts on fauna 5. AIR ENVIRONMENT 5.1. Will the project increase atmospheric concentration of gases & result in heat islands? (Give details of background air quality levels with predicted values based on dispersion models taking into account the increased traffic generation as a result of the proposed constructions) 5.2. What are the impacts on generation of dust, smoke, odorous fumes or other hazardous gases? Give details in relation to all the meteorological parameters. 5.3. Will the proposal create shortage of parking space for vehicles? Furnish details of the present level of transport infrastructure and measures proposed for improvement including the traffic management at the entry & exit to the project site. 5.4. Provide details of the movement patterns with internal roads, bicycle tracks, pedestrian pathways, footpaths etc., with areas under each category. 5.5. Will there be significant increase in traffic noise & vibrations? Give details of the sources and the measures proposed for mitigation of the above. 37 5.6. What will be the impact of DG sets & other equipment on noise levels & vibration in & ambient air quality around the project site? Provide details. 6. AESTHETICS 6.1. Will the proposed constructions in any way result in the obstruction of a view, scenic amenity or landscapes? Are these considerations taken into account by the proponents? 6.2. Will there be any adverse impacts from new constructions on the existing structures? What are the considerations taken into account? 6.3. Whether there are any local considerations of urban form & urban design influencing the design criteria? They may be explicitly spelt out. 6.4. Are there any anthropological or archaeological sites or artefacts nearby? State if any other significant features in the vicinity of the proposed site have been considered. 7. SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASPECTS 7.1. Will the proposal result in any changes to the demographic structure of local population? Provide the details. 7.2. Give details of the existing social infrastructure around the proposed project. 7.3. Will the project cause adverse effects on local communities, disturbance to sacred sites or other cultural values? What are the safeguards proposed? 8. BUILDING MATERIALS 8.1. May involve the use of building materials with high-embodied energy. Are the construction materials produced with energy efficient processes? (Give details of energy conservation measures in the selection of building materials and their energy efficiency) 8.2. Transport and handling of materials during construction may result in pollution, noise & public nuisance. What measures are taken to minimize the impacts? 8.3. Are recycled materials used in roads and structures? State the extent of savings achieved? 8.4. Give details of the methods of collection, segregation & disposal of the garbage generated during the operation phases of the project. 9. ENERGY CONSERVATION 9.1. Give details of the power requirements, source of supply, backup source etc. What is the energy consumption assumed per square foot of built-up area? How have you tried to minimize energy consumption? 38 9.2. What type of, and capacity of, power back-up to you plan to provide? 9.3. What are the characteristics of the glass you plan to use? Provide specifications of its characteristics related to both short wave and long wave radiation? 9.4. What passive solar architectural features are being used in the building? Illustrate the applications made in the proposed project. 9.5. Does the layout of streets & buildings maximise the potential for solar energy devices? Have you considered the use of street lighting, emergency lighting and solar hot water systems for use in the building complex? Substantiate with details. 9.6. Is shading effectively used to reduce cooling/heating loads? What principles have been used to maximize the shading of Walls on the East and the West and the Roof? How much energy saving has been effected? 9.7. Do the structures use energy-efficient space conditioning, lighting and mechanical systems? Provide technical details. Provide details of the transformers and motor efficiencies, lighting intensity and air-conditioning load assumptions? Are you using CFC and HCFC free chillers? Provide specifications. 9.8. What are the likely effects of the building activity in altering the micro-climates? Provide a self assessment on the likely impacts of the proposed construction on creation of heat island & inversion effects? 9.9. What are the thermal characteristics of the building envelope? (a) roof; (b) external walls; and (c) fenestration? Give details of the material used and the U-values or the R values of the individual components. 9.10. What precautions & safety measures are proposed against fire hazards? Furnish details of emergency plans. 9.11. If you are using glass as wall material provides details and specifications including emissivity and thermal characteristics. 9.12. What is the rate of air infiltration into the building? Provide details of how you are mitigating the effects of infiltration. 9.13. To what extent the non-conventional energy technologies are utilised in the overall energy consumption? Provide details of the renewable energy technologies used. 10. Environment Management Plan The Environment Management Plan would consist of all mitigation measures for each item wise activity to be undertaken during the construction, operation and the entire life 39 cycle to minimize adverse environmental impacts as a result of the activities of the project. It would also delineate the environmental monitoring plan for compliance of various environmental regulations. It will state the steps to be taken in case of emergency such as accidents at the site including fire. APPENDIX III (See paragraph 7 GENERIC STRUCTURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSENT DOCUMENT S.NO EIA STRUCTURE CONTENTS 1. Introduction • Purpose of the report • Identification of project & project proponent • Brief description of nature, size, location of the project and its importance to the country, region • Scope of the study – details of regulatory scoping carried out (As per Terms of Reference) 2. Project Description • Condensed description of those aspects of the project (based on project feasibility study), likely to cause environmental effects. Details should be provided to give clear picture of the following: • Type of project • Need for the project • Location (maps showing general location, specific location, project boundary & project site layout) • Size or magnitude of operation (incl. Associated activities required by or for the project • Proposed schedule for approval and implementation  Technology and process description • Project description. Including drawings showing project layout, components of project etc. Schematic 40 representations of the feasibility drawings which give information important for EIA purpose • Description of mitigation measures incorporated into the project to meet environmental standards, environmental operating conditions, or other EIA requirements (as required by the scope) • Assessment of New & untested technology for the risk of technological failure 3. Description of the • Study area, period, components & methodology Environment • Establishment of baseline for valued environmental components, as identified in the scope • Base maps of all environmental components 4. Anticipated • Details of Investigated Environmental impacts due to Environmental Impacts project location, possible accidents, project design, project & construction, regular operations, final decommissioning or Mitigation Measures rehabilitation of a completed project • Measures for minimizing and / or offsetting adverse impacts identified • Irreversible and Irretrievable commitments of environmental components • Assessment of significance of impacts (Criteria for determining significance, Assigning significance) • Mitigation measures 5. Analysis of Alternatives • In case, the scoping exercise results in need for (Technology alternatives: & Site) • Description of each alternative • Summary of adverse impacts of each alternative • Mitigation measures proposed for each alternative and • Selection of alternative 6. Environmental • Technical aspects of monitoring the effectiveness of Monitoring Program mitigation measures (incl. Measurement methodologies, frequency, location, data analysis, reporting schedules, emergency procedures, detailed budget & procurement schedules) 41 7. Additional Studies • Public Consultation • Risk assessment • Social Impact Assessment. R&R Action Plans 8. Project Benefits  Improvements in the physical infrastructure  Improvements in the social infrastructure  Employment potential –skilled; semi-skilled and unskilled  Other tangible benefits 9. Environmental Cost If recommended at the Scoping stage Benefit Analysis 10. EMP • Description of the administrative aspects of ensuring that mitigative measures are implemented and their effectiveness monitored, after approval of the EIA 11 Summary & Conclusion • Overall justification for implementation of the project (This will constitute the summary of the EIA • Explanation of how, adverse effects have been Report ) mitigated 12. Disclosure of  The names of the Consultants engaged with their Consultants engaged brief resume and nature of Consultancy rendered 42 APPENDIX III A (See paragraph 7) CONTENTS OF SUMMARY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT The Summary EIA shall be a summary of the full EIA Report condensed to ten A-4 size pages at the maximum. It should necessarily cover in brief the following Chapters of the full EIA Report: - 1. Project Description 2. Description of the Environment 3. Anticipated Environmental impacts and mitigation measures 4. Environmental Monitoring Programme 5. Additional Studies 6. Project Benefits 7. Environment Management Plan 43 APPENDIX IV (See paragraph 7) PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCT OF PUBLIC HEARING 1.0 The Public Hearing shall be arranged in a systematic, time bound and transparent manner ensuring widest possible public participation at the project site(s) or in its close proximity District -wise, by the concerned State Pollution Control Board (SPCB) or the Union Territory Pollution Control Committee (UTPCC). 2. 0 The Process: 2.1 The Applicant shall make a request through a simple letter to the Member Secretary of the SPCB or Union Territory Pollution Control Committee, in whose jurisdiction the project is located, to arrange the public hearing within the prescribed statutory period. In case the project site is extending beyond a State or Union Territory, the public hearing is mandated in each State or Union Territory in which the project is sited and the Applicant shall make separate requests to each concerned SPCB or UTPCC for holding the public hearing as per this procedure. 2.2 The Applicant shall enclose with the letter of request, at least 10 hard copies and an equivalent number of soft (electronic) copies of the draft EIA Report with the generic structure given in Appendix III including the Summary Environment Impact Assessment report in English and in the local language, prepared strictly in accordance with the Terms of Reference communicated after Scoping (Stage-2). Simultaneously the applicant shall arrange to forward copies, one hard and one soft, of the above draft EIA Report along with the Summary EIA report to the Ministry of Environment and Forests and to the following authorities or offices, within whose jurisdiction the project will be located: (a) District Magistrate/s (b) Zila Parishad or Municipal Corporation (c) District Industries Office (d) Concerned Regional Office of the Ministry of Environment and Forests 2.3 On receiving the draft Environmental Impact Assessment report, the above-mentioned authorities except the MoEF, shall arrange to widely publicize it within their respective jurisdictions requesting the interested persons to send their comments to the concerned regulatory authorities. They shall also make available the draft EIA Report for inspection electronically or otherwise to the public during normal office hours till the Public Hearing is over. The Ministry of Environment and 44 Forests shall promptly display the Summary of the draft Environmental Impact Assessment report on its website, and also make the full draft EIA available for reference at a notified place during normal office hours in the Ministry at Delhi. 2.4 The SPCB or UTPCC concerned shall also make similar arrangements for giving publicity about the project within the State/Union Territory and make available the Summary of the draft Environmental Impact Assessment report (Appendix III A) for inspection in select offices or public libraries or panchayats etc. They shall also additionally make available a copy of the draft Environmental Impact Assessment report to the above five authorities/offices viz, Ministry of Environment and Forests, District Magistrate etc. 3.0 Notice of Public Hearing: 3.1 The Member-Secretary of the concerned SPCB or UTPCC shall finalize the date, time and exact venue for the conduct of public hearing within 7(seven) days of the date of receipt of the draft Environmental Impact Assessment report from the project proponent, and advertise the same in one major National Daily and one Regional vernacular Daily. A minimum notice period of 30(thirty) days shall be provided to the public for furnishing their responses; 3.2 The advertisement shall also inform the public about the places or offices where the public could access the draft Environmental Impact Assessment report and the Summary Environmental Impact Assessment report before the public hearing. 3.3 No postponement of the date, time, venue of the public hearing shall be undertaken, unless some untoward emergency situation occurs and only on the recommendation of the concerned District Magistrate the postponement shall be notified to the public through the same National and Regional vernacular dailies and also prominently displayed at all the identified offices by the concerned SPCB or Union Territory Pollution Control Committee; 3.4 In the above exceptional circumstances fresh date, time and venue for the public consultation shall be decided by the Member –Secretary of the concerned SPCB or UTPCC only in consultation with the District Magistrate and notified afresh as per procedure under 3.1 above. 4.0 The Panel 4.1 The District Magistrate or his or her representative not below the rank of an Additional District Magistrate assisted by a representative of SPCB or UTPCC, shall supervise and preside over the entire public hearing process. 5.0 Videography 45 5.1 The SPCB or UTPCC shall arrange to video film the entire proceedings. A copy of the videotape or a CD shall be enclosed with the public hearing proceedings while forwarding it to the Regulatory Authority concerned. 6.0 Proceedings 6.1 The attendance of all those who are present at the venue shall be noted and annexed with the final proceedings. 6.2 There shall be no quorum required for attendance for starting the proceedings. 6.3 A representative of the applicant shall initiate the proceedings with a presentation on the project and the Summary EIA report. 6.4 Every person present at the venue shall be granted the opportunity to seek information or clarifications on the project from the Applicant. The summary of the public hearing proceedings accurately reflecting all the views and concerns expressed shall be recorded by the representative of the SPCB or UTPCC and read over to the audience at the end of the proceedings explaining the contents in the vernacular language and the agreed minutes shall be signed by the District Magistrate or his or her representative on the same day and forwarded to the SPCB/UTPCC concerned. 6.5 A Statement of the issues raised by the public and the comments of the Applicant shall also be prepared in the local language and in English and annexed to the proceedings: 6.6 The proceedings of the public hearing shall be conspicuously displayed at the office of the Panchyats within whose jurisdiction the project is located, office of the concerned Zila Parishad, District Magistrate ,and the SPCB or UTPCC . The SPCB or UTPCC shall also display the proceedings on its website for general information. Comments, if any, on the proceedings which may be sent directly to the concerned regulatory authorities and the Applicant concerned. 7.0 Time period for completion of public hearing 7.1 The public hearing shall be completed within a period of 45 (forty five) days from date of receipt of the request letter from the Applicant. Therefore the SPCB or UTPCC concerned shall sent the public hearing proceedings to the concerned regulatory authority within 8(eight) days of the completion of the public hearing .The applicant may also directly forward a copy of the approved public hearing proceedings to the regulatory authority concerned along with the final Environmental Impact Assessment report or supplementary report to the draft EIA report prepared after the public hearing and public consultations. 46 7.2 If the SPCB or UTPCC fails to hold the public hearing within the stipulated 45(forty five) days, the Central Government in Ministry of Environment and Forests for Category ‘A’ project or activity and the State Government or Union Territory Administration for Category ‘B’ project or activity at the request of the SEIAA, shall engage any other agency or authority to complete the process, as per procedure laid down in this notification. APPENDIX –V (See paragraph 7) PROCEDURE PRESCRIBED FOR APPRAISAL 1. The applicant shall apply to the concerned regulatory authority through a simple communication enclosing the following documents where public consultations are mandatory: -  Final Environment Impact Assessment Report [20(twenty) hard copies and 1 (one) soft copy)]  A copy of the video tape or CD of the public hearing proceedings  A copy of final layout plan (20 copies)  A copy of the project feasibility report (1 copy) 2. The Final EIA Report and the other relevant documents submitted by the applicant shall be scrutinized in office within 30 days from the date of its receipt by the concerned Regulatory Authority strictly with reference to the TOR and the inadequacies noted shall be communicated electronically or otherwise in a single set to the Members of the EAC /SEAC enclosing a copy each of the Final EIA Report including the public hearing proceedings and other public responses received along with a copy of Form -1or Form 1A and scheduled date of the EAC /SEAC meeting for considering the proposal . 3. Where a public consultation is not mandatory and therefore a formal EIA study is not required, the appraisal shall be made on the basis of the prescribed application Form 1 and a pre-feasibility report in the case of all projects and activities other than Item 8 of the Schedule .In the case of Item 8 of the Schedule, considering its unique project cycle , the EAC or SEAC concerned shall appraise all Category B projects or activities on the basis of Form 1, Form 1A and the conceptual plan and stipulate the conditions for environmental clearance . As and when the applicant submits the approved scheme /building plans complying with the stipulated environmental clearance conditions with all other necessary statutory approvals, the EAC /SEAC shall recommend the grant of environmental clearance to the competent authority. 4. Every application shall be placed before the EAC /SEAC and its appraisal completed within 60 days of its receipt with requisite documents / details in the prescribed manner. 47 5. The applicant shall be informed at least 15 (fifteen) days prior to the scheduled date of the EAC /SEAC meeting for considering the project proposal. 6. The minutes of the EAC /SEAC meeting shall be finalised within 5 working days of the meeting and displayed on the website of the concerned regulatory authority. In case the project or activity is recommended for grant of EC, then the minutes shall clearly list out the specific environmental safeguards and conditions. In case the recommendations are for rejection, the reasons for the same shall also be explicitly stated. . 48 APPENDIX VI (See paragraph 5) COMPOSITION OF THE SECTOR/ PROJECT SPECIFIC EXPERT APPRAISAL COMMITTEE (EAC) FOR CATEGORY A PROJECTS AND THE STATE/UT LEVEL EXPERT APPRAISAL COMMITTEES (SEACs) FOR CATEGORY B PROJECTS TO BE CONSTITUTED BY THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT ` 1. The Expert Appraisal Committees (EAC(s) and the State/UT Level Expert Appraisal Committees (SEACs) shall consist of only professionals and experts fulfilling the following eligibility criteria: Professional: The person should have at least (i) 5 years of formal University training in the concerned discipline leading to a MA/MSc Degree, or (ii) in case of Engineering /Technology/Architecture disciplines, 4 years formal training in a professional training course together with prescribed practical training in the field leading to a B.Tech/B.E./B.Arch. Degree, or (iii) Other professional degree (e.g. Law) involving a total of 5 years of formal University training and prescribed practical training, or (iv) Prescribed apprenticeship/article ship and pass examinations conducted by the concerned professional association (e.g. Chartered Accountancy ),or (v) a University degree , followed by 2 years of formal training in a University or Service Academy (e.g. MBA/IAS/IFS). In selecting the individual professionals, experience gained by them in their respective fields will be taken note of. Expert: A professional fulfilling the above eligibility criteria with at least 15 years of relevant experience in the field, or with an advanced degree (e.g. Ph.D.) in a concerned field and at least 10 years of relevant experience. Age: Below 70 years. However, in the event of the non-availability of /paucity of experts in a given field, the maximum age of a member of the Expert Appraisal Committee may be allowed up to 75 years 2. The Members of the EAC shall be Experts with the requisite expertise and experience in the following fields /disciplines. In the event that persons fulfilling the criteria of “Experts� are not available, Professionals in the same field with sufficient experience may be considered: • Environment Quality Experts: Experts in measurement/monitoring, analysis and interpretation of data in relation to environmental quality • Sectoral Experts in Project Management: Experts in Project Management or Management of Process/Operations/Facilities in the relevant sectors.  Environmental Impact Assessment Process Experts: Experts in conducting and carrying out Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) and preparation of Environmental Management Plans (EMPs) and other Management plans and who have wide expertise and knowledge of predictive techniques and tools used in the EIA process 49 • Risk Assessment Experts  Life Science Experts in floral and faunal management  Forestry and Wildlife Experts  Environmental Economics Expert with experience in project appraisal 3. The Membership of the EAC shall not exceed 15 (fifteen) regular Members. However the Chairperson may co-opt an expert as a Member in a relevant field for a particular meeting of the Committee. 4. The Chairperson shall be an outstanding and experienced environmental policy expert or expert in management or public administration with wide experience in the relevant development sector. 5. The Chairperson shall nominate one of the Members as the Vice Chairperson who shall preside over the EAC in the absence of the Chairman /Chairperson. 6. A representative of the Ministry of Environment and Forests shall assist the Committee as its Secretary. 7. The maximum tenure of a Member, including Chairperson, shall be for 2 (two) terms of 3 (three) years each. 8. The Chairman / Members may not be removed prior to expiry of the tenure without cause and proper enquiry. 50 A summary of various State Govt. Policies and Orders are given below Act/Policy/Guidelines Summary National/ State Land Acquisition Act, 1894 It is applicable whenever it appears to the [appropriate Government] the National land in any locality [is needed or] is likely to be needed for any public purpose [or for a company]. Taking Possession Power to take possession. - When the Collector has made an award under section 11, he may take possession of the land, which shall thereupon [vest absolutely in the [Government], free from all encumbrances. Special powers in case of urgency. – (1) In cases of urgency whenever the [appropriate Government], so directs, the Collector, though no such award has been made, may, on the expiration of fifteen days from the publication of the notice mentioned in section 9, sub-section 1). [take possession of any land needed for a public purpose]. Such land shall thereupon [vest absolutely in the [Government], free from all encumbrances. (2) Whenever, owing to any sudden change in the channel of any navigable river or other unforeseen emergency, it becomes necessary for any Railway Administration to acquire the immediate possession of any land for the maintenance of their traffic or for the purpose of making thereon a river-side or ghat station, or of providing convenient connection with or accesses to any such station, [or the appropriate Government considers it necessary to acquire the immediate possession of any land for the purpose of maintaining any structure or system pertaining to irrigation, water supply, drainage, road communication or electricity,] the Collector may immediately after the publication of the notice mentioned in sub-section (1) and with the previous sanction of the [appropriate Government], enter upon and take possession of such land, which shall thereupon [vest absolutely in the [Government]] free from all encumbrances. (3) In every case under either of the preceding sub-sections the Collector shall at that time of taking possession offer to the persons interested compensation for the standing crops and trees (if any) on such land and from any other damage sustained by them caused by such sudden dispossession and not excepted in section 24; and, in case such offer is not accepted, the value of such crops and trees and the amount of such other damage shall be allowed for in awarding compensation for the land under the provisions herein contained. Temporary Occupation of Land Temporary occupation of waste or arable land. Procedure when difference as to compensation exists. - (1) Subject to the provisions of Part VII of this Act, whenever it appears to the [appropriate Government] that the temporary occupation and use of any waste or arable land are needed for any public purpose, or for a Company, the [appropriate Government] may direct the Collector to procure the occupation and use of the same for such term as it shall think fit, not exceeding three years from the commencement of such occupation. (2) The Collector shall thereupon give notice in writing to the person interested in such land of the purpose for which the same is needed, and shall, for the occupation and use thereof for such term as aforesaid, and for the materials (if any) to be taken there from, pay to them such compensation, either in a gross sum of money, or by monthly or other periodical payments, as shall be agreed upon in writing between him and such persons respectively. (3) In case the Collector and the persons interested differ as to the sufficiency of the compensation or apportionment thereof, the Collector shall refer such difference to the decision of the Court. 51 Power to enter and take possession and compensation on restoration. - (1) On payment of such compensation, or on executing such agreement, or on making a reference under section 35, the collector may enter upon and take possession of the land, and use or permit the use thereof in accordance with the terms of the said notice. (2) On the expiration of the term, the Collector shall make or tender to the persons interested compensation for the damage (if any) done to the land and not provided for by the agreement, and shall restore the land to the persons interested therein: Provided that, if the land has become permanently unfit to be used for the purpose for which it was used immediately before the commencement of such term, and if the persons interested shall so require, the [appropriate Government] shall proceed under this Act to acquire the land as if it was needed permanently for a public purpose or for a Company. A copy of this Act is attached in Annexure 6.2A. Land Acquisition The body or Department for which the land if being acquired may, at any State (Determination of stage of the proceedings settle down the terms and conditions and rates of Compensation and the land under acquisition, with the land owners and appear before the Declaration of Award by Collectors and make an application indicating the terms and conditions so Agreement) Rules, 1997 settled down and its readiness and willingness for determination of compensation and declaration of award in accordance with agreement. The Collector shall, if satisfied, issue notice to the persons interested in the land under acquisition to express their readiness and willingness to execute the agreement in writing, on the matters to be included in the award. A copy of this rule is attached in Annexure 6.2A. National Rehabilitation and The system rehabilitation and modernization is unlikely to involve any National Resettlement Policy, 2007 need for land acquisition or resettlement and rehabilitation (R&R). In the rare event that this is needed, the provisions of UP State R& R Policy shall be invoked. A Resettlement Policy Framework has been prepared under this project. This National Policy is not applicable to the project. A copy of this policy is attached in Annexure 6.2A. Uttar Pradesh Water Sector The Policy describes the procedures to follow, the process for land Resettlement and acquisition and payment of compensation, assistance provided, and Rehabilitation Policy, 2001 guidelines for planning and implementing Rehabilitation and Resettlement, as well as the organizational structure and monitoring and post-project evaluation. A copy of this policy is attached in Annexure 6.2A. Government Oder No. The major features of 2010 Uttar Pradesh Rehabilitation and Resettlement State 1252/1-13-10-20 (29)/ Policy relevant to the project are 2004, 17 August 2010  Each of the project affected family whose entire land has been laying out Uttar Pradesh acquired for the project is entitled for one time compensation Rehabilitation and equivalent to five years of minimum agriculture wages for loss of Resettlement Policy livelihood.  Each of the project affected family whose land has been acquired partially and who has become marginal farmers due to acquisition of land in the project area are entitled for one time compensation equivalent to 500 days of minimum agriculture wages for loss of livelihood.  Each of the project affected family whose land has been acquired partially and who has become small farmers due to acquisition of land in the project area are entitled for one time compensation equivalent to 375 days of minimum agriculture wages for loss of livelihood.  Agriculture and non agriculture farmers whose land has been acquired partially due to acquisition of land in the project area are entitled for one time compensation equivalent to 625 days of minimum agriculture wages for loss of livelihood.  In addition to the above compensation, each of the project affected family which has been displaced will be given one time compensation equivalent to 250 days of minimum agriculture wages for loss of livelihood. 52  Each of the project affected family will be given housing facility in case of emergency acquisition of land under section 17 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 till such time that the RAP is prepared & implemented.  PAF will provide adequate facilities for capacity building & skill development for self employment under to start for self employment.  The policy further prescribes the organizational structure for land acquisition, and related conflict resolution and its implementation. A copy of this policy is attached in Annexure 6.2A. Government Order No. 71- These Government Orders apply to the quick procedure for land State 1/13-11-7-3(1)/90-59T.C.- acquisition. Government Order of 01 December, 2010, states that the basis 1, 04 February, 2011 and for invoking this quick procedure should be supported by appropriate data Government Order No. and permissions. Government Order of 04 February, 2011, states that the 1666/1-13-2010-18- quick procedure should be evoked under extreme emergency conditions 1(95)/10, 01 December, only. A copy of this policy is attached in Annexure 6.2A. 2010 Government Oder No. The Government Orders apply to Uttar Pradesh Rehabilitation and State 1307/1-13-10- (29)/ 2004, Resettlement of families affected in Land Acquisition Matters. A copy of 03 September 2010 this policy is attached in Annexure 6.2A. Government Order No. The Government Order lays out Uttar Pradesh Land Acquisition Policy. State 632/1-13-11-20(29)2004, 2 The general policy for taking land for all purpose will be that the land be June, 2011 laying out Uttar purchased directly from the land owners on the basis of mutual Pradesh Land Acquisition understanding/agreement arrived at between the land owners & the Policy acquisition bodies by following the relevant rules/orders relating to the purchase of land. For implementation of infrastructure projects in public sector, the process of land acquisition would be initiated by following the Rules & Regulations as provided in the Land Acquisition Act 1894, but the compensation of land would be fixed by mutual consent as per the provisions of The Uttar Pradesh Land Acquisition (Determination of Compensation and Declaration of Award by Agreement) Rules, 1997 and the land owners would be given all the benefits of the Rehabilitation &Resettlement Policy 2010. A copy of this policy is attached in Annexure 6.2A. Government Order No. The Government Orders apply to land taken for various irrigation projects State 2386/12-27 –I-3-28L/12, 08 by mutual agreement and determine compensation. October, 2012 53                           Annexure 4.1- Secondary Data Tables LGC                         54 Table 1 : Population of SC &ST , Total Population, area and families, 1991 Total Population Population of SC Population of ST Block Name Total Male Male (%) Female Female (%) Total Total (%) Males Male (%) Females Female (%) Total Total (%) Males Male (%) Females Female (%) Bar 100115 53817 53.76 46298 46.24 22969 22.94 12181 53.03 10788 46.97 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Birdha 116456 62416 53.60 54040 46.40 33886 29.10 18018 53.17 15868 46.83 339 0.29 190 56.05 149 43.95 Mahrauni 95956 51224 53.38 44732 46.62 25079 26.14 13452 53.64 11627 46.36 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Mandawara 92148 49362 53.57 42786 46.43 26841 29.13 14327 53.38 12514 46.62 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Total 404675 216819 53.58 187856 46.42 108775 26.88 57978 53.30 50797 46.70 339 0.08 190 56.05 149 43.95 Total District 752043 403685 53.68 348358 46.32 188927 25.12 100656 53.28 88271 46.72 349 0.05 195 55.87 154 44.13 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab7.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0001 Population of SC &ST , Total Population, area and families, 2001 Total Population Population of SC Population of ST Block Name Total Male Male (%) Female Female (%) Total Total (%) Males Male (%) Females Female (%) Total Total (%) Males Male (%) Females Female (%) Bar 130406 69505 53.30 60901 46.70 30377 23.29 16103 53.01 14274 46.99 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Birdha 156121 82744 53.00 73377 47.00 45665 29.25 24046 52.66 21619 47.34 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Mahrauni 127764 67471 52.81 60293 47.19 33642 26.33 17762 52.80 15880 47.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Mandawara 118347 62801 53.07 55546 46.93 34151 28.86 18094 52.98 16057 47.02 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Total 532638 282521 53.04 250117 46.96 143835 27.00 76005 52.84 67830 47.16 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Total District 977734 519413 53.12 458321 46.88 243786 24.93 128821 52.84 114965 47.16 2 0.00 2 100.00 0 0.00         % Decadal increment Block Name 1991-2001 2001-2011 Bar 30.25 NA Birdha 34.06 NA Mahrauni 33.14 NA Mandawara 28.43 NA Total 30.01 24.57 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab6.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0910    Table 3: Block wise Population Density Year 1991 Year 2001 Block Name Area (In Sq. km.) Total Population Population Density Area (In Sq. km.) Total Population Population Density Bar 659.05 100115 152 659.05 130406 198 Birdha 1046.13 116456 111 1046.13 156121 149 Mahrauni 733.36 95956 131 733.36 127764 174 Mandawara 731.7 92148 126 731.7 118347 162 Total 3170.2 404675 128 3170.24 532638 168 Total District 5039 752043 149 5039 977734 194 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab7.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0001  http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab7.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0405    55   Table 4 : Block wise Sex Ratio: Number of families per 1000 males  YEAR 1991 YEAR 2001 Sex Ratio Block Name Total Male Total Female Sex Ratio Total Male Total Female Sex Ratio 2011 Bar 53817 46298 860 69505 60901 876 NA Birdha 62416 54040 866 82744 73377 887 NA Mahrauni 51224 44732 873 67471 60293 894 NA Mandawara 49362 42786 867 62801 55546 884 NA Total 216819 187856 866 282521 250117 885 NA Total District 403685 348358 863 519413 458321 882 905 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab7.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0001  http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab7.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0405    Table 5: Blockwise number of literate people and literacy percentage in the district       Literate people 2001 Literacy percentage 2001 Literacy percentage2011 Gender Gender Gap Gap in Block in Literacy Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Literacy 2001 2011 Bar 31867 12258 44125 57.6 25.63 42.78 31.97 NA NA NA NA Birdha 40977 15949 56926 62.97 28 46.65 34.97 NA NA NA NA Mahrauni 35519 15222 50741 66.28 32.36 50.43 33.92 NA NA NA NA Mandawara 29970 12654 42624 60.04 29.25 45.74 30.79 NA NA NA NA Total 138333 56083 194416 61.72 28.81 46.40 32.91 NA NA NA NA Total District 265227 119264 384491 63.81 32.97 49.46 30.84 76.41 52.26 64.96 24.15 Source : http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab15.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0910        Table 6 : Blockwise Number of schools per lacs population         Number of primary schools per lacs population Block Name 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Bar 114.9 114.9 125.9 118.9 91.3 108.9 112.7 112.7 112.7 Birdha 126.2 134 135.7 140 104.4 124.3 132.6 132.6 132.6 Mahrauni 125.1 132.4 136.5 126.1 94.7 122.1 127.6 127.6 127.6 Mandawara 141.1 141.1 144.3 138.9 108.2 120.8 127.6 127.6 127.6 Total 126.8 130.6 135.6 131.0 99.7 119.0 125.1 125.1 125.1                     Number of senior primary schools per lacs population Block Name 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Bar 35 33 37 43.9 33.7 36 47.5 47.5 47.5 Birdha 34.3 31.8 36.9 49.8 37.2 44.8 56.4 56.4 56.4 Mahrauni 26.1 36.5 38.6 46.9 35.2 38.4 54 54 54 Mandawara 29.3 32.6 42.3 53.2 41.4 47.3 62.5 62.5 62.5 Total 31.2 33.5 38.7 48.5 36.9 41.6 55.1 55.1 55.1                     Number of higher secondary schools per lacs population Block Name 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Bar 2 3 3 3 2.3 2.3 2.3 3.1 3.1 Birdha 3.4 2.6 3.4 3.4 2.6 2.6 1.9 1.9 1.9 Mahrauni 4.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 1.6 1.6 3.1 3.1 3.1   56 Mandawara 3.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 Total 3.2 3.0 3.2 3.2 2.5 2.5 2.7 2.9 2.9 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab3.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0102    http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab3.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0304   http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab3.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0506   http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab3.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0708   http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab3.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0910     Table 7: Blockwise situation of water supply in the villages of district Blockwise 2000-01 Villages under water supply by Tap/ Hand pump No. of deprived SC No. of villages using general sources No. of deprived India mark 2 villages under water Block Name villages from Partially Benefited General Hand pump supply by Tap/ Hand Fully Covered Well Tap Other Total water supply Covered Population Hand pump India mark 2 pump India mark 2 Bar 87 0 100115 0 0 87 0 0 87 0 0 Birdha 144 1 116456 0 0 145 0 0 145 0 0 Mahrauni 97 0 95956 0 0 97 0 0 97 0 0 Mandawara 122 0 92148 0 0 122 0 0 122 0 0 Total 450 1 404675 0 0 451 0 0 451 0 0 Total District 674 1 646495 0 0 675 0 0 675 0 0 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab542001.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0001                               Blockwise 2001-02 Villages under water supply by Tap/ Hand pump No. of deprived SC No. of villages using general sources No. of deprived India mark 2 villages under water Block Name villages from Partially Benefited General Hand pump supply by Tap/ Hand Fully Covered Well Tap Other Total water supply Covered Population Hand pump India mark 2 pump India mark 2 Bar 87 0 100115 0 0 87 0 0 87 0 0 Birdha 145 0 116456 0 0 145 0 0 145 0 0 Mahrauni 97 0 95956 0 0 97 0 0 97 0 0 Mandawara 122 0 92148 0 0 122 0 0 122 0 0 Total 451 0 404675 0 0 451 0 0 451 0 0 Total District 675 0 646495 0 0 675 0 0 675 0 0 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab542001.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0102                            Blockwise 2002-03                       Villages under water supply by Tap/ Hand pump No. of deprived SC No. of villages using general sources No. of deprived India mark 2 villages under water Block Name villages from Partially Benefited General Hand pump supply by Tap/ Hand Fully Covered Well Tap Other Total water supply Covered Population Hand pump India mark 2 pump India mark 2 Bar 87 0 100115 0 0 87 0 0 87 0 0 Birdha 145 0 116456 0 0 145 0 0 145 0 0 Mahrauni 97 0 95956 0 0 97 0 0 97 0 0 Mandawara 122 0 92148 0 0 122 0 0 122 0 0 Total 451 0 404675 0 0 451 0 0 451 0 0 Total District 681 0 649940 0 0 681 0 0 681 0 0 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab542001.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0203      57                 Blockwise 2003-04                       Villages under water supply by Tap/ Hand pump No. of deprived SC No. of villages using general sources No. of deprived India mark 2 villages under water Block Name villages from Partially Benefited General Hand pump supply by Tap/ Hand Fully Covered Well Tap Other Total water supply Covered Population Hand pump India mark 2 pump India mark 2 Bar 87 0 100115 0 0 87 0 0 87 0 0 Birdha 145 0 116456 0 0 145 0 0 145 0 0 Mahrauni 97 0 95956 0 0 97 0 0 97 0 0 Mandawara 122 0 92148 0 0 122 0 0 122 0 0 Total 451 0 404675 0 0 451 0 0 451 0 0 Total District 681 0 649940 0 0 681 0 0 681 0 0 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab542001.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0304                    Blockwise 2004-05  Villages under water supply by Tap/ Hand pump No. of deprived SC No. of villages using general sources No. of deprived India mark 2 villages under water Block Name villages from Partially Benefited General Hand pump supply by Tap/ Hand Fully Covered Well Tap Other Total water supply Covered Population Hand pump India mark 2 pump India mark 2 Bar 89 0 130406 0 0 89 0 0 89 0 0 Birdha 146 0 156121 0 0 146 0 0 146 0 0 Mahrauni 97 0 127764 0 0 97 0 0 97 0 0 Mandawara 122 0 118347 0 0 122 0 0 122 0 0 Total 454 0 532638 0 0 454 0 0 454 0 0 Total District 697 0 835790 0 0 697 0 0 697 0 0 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab542001.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0405                      Blockwise 2005-06  Villages under water supply by Tap/ Hand pump No. of deprived SC No. of villages using general sources No. of deprived India mark 2 villages under water Block Name villages from Partially Benefited General Hand pump supply by Tap/ Hand Fully Covered Well Tap Other Total water supply Covered Population Hand pump India mark 2 pump India mark 2 Bar 89 0 130406 0 0 89 0 0 89 0 0 Birdha 146 0 156121 0 0 146 0 0 146 0 0 Mahrauni 97 0 127764 0 0 97 0 0 97 0 0 Mandawara 122 0 118347 0 0 122 0 0 122 0 0 Total 454 0 532638 0 0 454 0 0 454 0 0 Total District 697 0 835790 0 0 697 0 0 697 0 0 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab542001.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0506                        58   Blockwise 2006-07  Villages under water supply by Tap/ Hand pump No. of deprived SC No. of villages using general sources No. of deprived India mark 2 villages under water Block Name villages from Partially Benefited General Hand pump supply by Tap/ Hand Fully Covered Well Tap Other Total water supply Covered Population Hand pump India mark 2 pump India mark 2 Bar 89 0 130406 0 0 89 0 0 89 0 0 Birdha 146 0 156121 0 0 146 0 0 146 0 0 Mahrauni 97 0 127764 0 0 97 0 0 97 0 0 Mandawara 122 0 118347 0 0 122 0 0 122 0 0 Total 454 0 532638 0 0 454 0 0 454 0 0 Total District 697 0 835790 0 0 697 0 0 697 0 0 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab542001.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0607                              Blockwise 2007-08                       Villages under water supply by Tap/ Hand pump No. of deprived SC No. of villages using general sources No. of deprived India mark 2 villages under water Block Name villages from Partially Benefited General Hand pump supply by Tap/ Hand Fully Covered Well Tap Other Total water supply Covered Population Hand pump India mark 2 pump India mark 2 Bar 89 0 130406 0 0 89 0 0 89 0 0 Birdha 146 0 156121 0 0 146 0 0 146 0 0 Mahrauni 97 0 127764 0 0 97 0 0 97 0 0 Mandawara 122 0 118347 0 0 122 0 0 122 0 0 Total 454 0 532638 0 0 454 0 0 454 0 0 Total District 697 0 835790 0 0 697 0 0 697 0 0 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab542001.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0708                              Blockwise 2008-09  Villages under water supply by Tap/ Hand pump No. of deprived SC No. of villages using general sources No. of deprived India mark 2 villages under water Block Name villages from Partially Benefited General Hand pump supply by Tap/ Hand Fully Covered Well Tap Other Total water supply Covered Population Hand pump India mark 2 pump India mark 2 Bar 89 0 130406 0 0 89 0 0 89 0 0 Birdha 146 0 156121 0 0 146 0 0 146 0 0 Mahrauni 97 0 127764 0 0 97 0 0 97 0 0 Mandawara 122 0 118347 0 0 122 0 0 122 0 0 Total 454 0 532638 0 0 454 0 0 454 0 0 Total District 697 0 835790 0 0 697 0 0 697 0 0 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab542001.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0809                                59   Blockwise 2009-10  Villages under water supply by Tap/ Hand pump No. of deprived SC No. of villages using general sources No. of deprived India mark 2 villages under water Block Name villages from Partially Benefited General Hand pump supply by Tap/ Hand Fully Covered Well Tap Other Total water supply Covered Population Hand pump India mark 2 pump India mark 2 Bar 89 0 130406 0 0 89 0 0 89 0 0 Birdha 146 0 156121 0 0 146 0 0 146 0 0 Mahrauni 97 0 127764 0 0 97 0 0 97 0 0 Mandawara 122 0 118347 0 0 122 0 0 122 0 0 Total 454 0 532638 0 0 454 0 0 454 0 0 Total District 697 0 835790 0 0 697 0 0 697 0 0 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab542001.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0910      Table 8: Length of total pakki roads per thousands sq. Km. (Km.) Block Name 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Bar 262.5 277.7 277.7 277.7 282.2 282.2 282.2 271.1 298.7 Birdha 272.4 282.9 282.9 282.9 285.8 285.8 282.0 261.6 294.4 Mahrauni 270.0 285.0 285.0 285.0 289.1 289.1 275.4 272.1 272.1 Mandawara 226.9 239.2 248.7 252.8 256.9 256.9 246.0 229.0 248.1 Total 258.0 271.2 273.6 274.6 278.5 278.5 271.4 258.5 278.3 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab3.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0304 http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab3.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0506   http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab3.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0708   http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab3.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0910     Table 9: Blockwise Percentage of electrified villages to total villages in population Percentage of electrified villages to total villages in population Block Name 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Bar 67.8 69.0 71.3 71.3 77.5 94.4 98.9 100.0 100.0 Birdha 48.3 50.3 51.0 51.7 55.5 65.8 97.3 100.0 100.0 Mahrauni 61.1 63.2 66.3 66.3 72.2 89.7 97.9 99.0 99.0 Mandawara 44.3 45.9 46.7 46.7 50.8 63.1 96.7 100.0 100.0 Total 55.4 57.1 58.8 59.0 64.0 78.3 97.7 99.8 99.8 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab3.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0102      http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab3.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0304     http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab3.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0506     http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab3.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0708     http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab3.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0910     Table 10 : Blockwise no. of scheduled commercial banks and rural banks in the district Blockwise 2000-01 Block Name No. of Nationalized Banks No. of Rural Banks No. of other Non-Commercial Nationalized Banks Talbehat 1 3 0 Jakhaura 3 2 1 Bar 3 2 2 Birdha 4 3 3 Total 11 10 6 Total District 23 23 13   60 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab52.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0001   Blockwise 2001-02     Block Name No. of Nationalized Banks No. of Rural Banks No. of other Non-Commercial Nationalized Banks Bar 3 1 2 Birdha 4 3 3 Mahrauni 1 3 0 Mandawara 2 4 1 Total 10 11 6 Total District 23 20 13 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab52.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0102          Blockwise 2002-03     Block Name No. of Nationalized Banks No. of Rural Banks No. of other Non-Commercial Nationalized Banks Bar 3 1 2 Birdha 4 3 3 Mahrauni 2 4 1 Mandawara 1 3 0 Total 10 11 6 Total District 23 20 13 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab52.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0203          Blockwise 2003-04     Block Name No. of Nationalized Banks No. of Rural Banks No. of other Non-Commercial Nationalized Banks Bar 3 1 2 Birdha 4 3 3 Mahrauni 2 4 1 Mandawara 1 3 0 Total 10 11 6 Total District 23 20 13 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab52.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0304        Blockwise 2004-05     Block Name No. of Nationalized Banks No. of Rural Banks No. of other Non-Commercial Nationalized Banks Bar 3 1 2 Birdha 4 3 3 Mahrauni 2 4 1 Mandawara 1 3 0 Total 10 11 6 Total District 23 20 13 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab52.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0405              61   Block wise 2005-06     Block Name No. of Nationalized Banks No. of Rural Banks No. of other Non-Commercial Nationalized Banks Bar 3 1 2 Birdha 4 3 3 Mahrauni 2 4 1 Mandawara 1 3 0 Total 10 11 6 Total District 25 20 13 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab52.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0506          Block wise 2006-07     Block Name No. of Nationalized Banks No. of Rural Banks No. of other Non-Commercial Nationalized Banks Bar 3 1 2 Birdha 4 3 3 Mahrauni 2 4 1 Mandawara 1 3 0 Total 10 11 6 Total District 27 20 13 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab52.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0607          Blockwise 2007-08     Block Name No. of Nationalized Banks No. of Rural Banks No. of other Non-Commercial Nationalized Banks Bar 3 1 2 Birdha 4 3 3 Mahrauni 2 4 1 Mandawara 1 3 0 Total 10 11 6 Total District 27 20 13 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab52.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0708          Blockwise 2008-09     Block Name No. of Nationalized Banks No. of Rural Banks No. of other Non-Commercial Nationalized Banks Bar 3 1 2 Birdha 4 3 3 Mahrauni 2 4 1 Mandawara 1 3 0 Total 10 11 6 Total District 28 20 13 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab52.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0809          Blockwise 2009-10     Block Name No. of Nationalized Banks No. of Rural Banks No. of other Non-Commercial Nationalized Banks Bar 3 1 2 Birdha 4 3 3 Mahrauni 2 4 1   62 Mandawara 2 3 0 Total 11 11 6 Total District 34 20 13 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab52.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0910    Table 11 : Blockwise Communication services in the district Blockwise 2000-01 Block Name Post Office Telegraph Office P.C.O. Telephone Railway Station Bus Stop Bar 23 0 37 120 0 23 Birdha 32 0 7 315 3 34 Mahrauni 17 0 10 190 0 36 Mandawara 22 0 3 530 0 21 Total 94 0 57 1155 3 114 Total District 153 2 290 9164 9 184 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab51.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0001 Blockwise 2001-02 Block Name Post Office Telegraph Office P.C.O. Telephone Railway Station Bus Stop Bar 23 0 37 120 0 23 Birdha 32 0 7 315 3 34 Mahrauni 17 0 10 190 0 36 Mandawara 22 0 3 530 0 21 Total 94 0 57 1155 3 114 Total District 153 2 290 9164 9 184 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab51.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0102 Blockwise 2002-03 Block Name Post Office Telegraph Office P.C.O. Telephone Railway Station Bus Stop Bar 23 0 37 120 0 27 Birdha 32 0 7 315 3 38 Mahrauni 17 0 10 190 0 36 Mandawara 22 0 3 530 0 21 Total 94 0 57 1155 3 122 Total District 153 2 290 9164 9 193 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab51.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0203 Blockwise 2003-04 Block Name Post Office Telegraph Office P.C.O. Telephone Railway Station Bus Stop Bar 23 0 37 120 0 27 Birdha 32 0 7 315 3 38 Mahrauni 17 0 10 190 0 36 Mandawara 22 0 3 530 0 21 Total 94 0 57 1155 3 122 Total District 153 2 290 9164 9 193 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab51.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0304 Blockwise 2004-05 Block Name Post Office Telegraph Office P.C.O. Telephone Railway Station Bus Stop Bar 23 0 37 120 0 27 Birdha 32 0 7 315 3 38   63 Mahrauni 17 0 10 190 0 36 Mandawara 22 0 3 530 0 21 Total 94 0 57 1155 3 122 Total District 153 2 290 9164 9 193 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab51.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0405 Blockwise 2005-06 Block Name Post Office Telegraph Office P.C.O. Telephone Railway Station Bus Stop Bar 23 0 37 120 0 27 Birdha 32 0 7 315 3 38 Mahrauni 17 0 10 190 0 36 Mandawara 22 0 3 530 0 21 Total 94 0 57 1155 3 122 Total District 153 2 290 9164 9 193 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab51.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0506 Blockwise 2006-07 Block Name Post Office Telegraph Office P.C.O. Telephone Railway Station Bus Stop Bar 23 0 37 366 0 27 Birdha 32 0 7 463 3 38 Mahrauni 17 0 10 456 0 36 Mandawara 22 0 3 588 0 21 Total 94 0 57 1873 3 122 Total District 153 2 290 9683 9 193 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab51.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0607 Blockwise 2007-08 Block Name Post Office Telegraph Office P.C.O. Telephone Railway Station Bus Stop Bar 23 0 6 295 0 27 Birdha 32 0 6 278 3 38 Mahrauni 17 0 26 891 0 36 Mandawara 22 0 20 693 0 21 Total 94 0 58 2157 3 122 Total District 153 2 264 8343 9 193 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab51.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0708 Blockwise 2008-09 Block Name Post Office Telegraph Office P.C.O. Telephone Railway Station Bus Stop Bar 23 0 8 279 0 27 Birdha 32 0 12 367 3 38 Mahrauni 17 0 10 421 0 36 Mandawara 22 0 26 523 0 21 Total 94 0 56 1590 3 122 Total District 153 2 227 6685 9 193 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab51.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0809 Blockwise 2009-10 Block Name Post Office Telegraph Office P.C.O. Telephone Railway Station Bus Stop Bar 23 0 4 302 0 27   64 Birdha 32 0 3 380 3 38 Mahrauni 17 0 5 534 0 36 Mandawara 22 0 9 635 0 21 Total 94 0 21 1851 3 122 Total District 153 2 110 6632 9 193 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab51.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0910   Table 12 : Number of Health facilities per lacs population Number of Allopathic hospitals and primary health centres per lacs population Block Name 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Bar 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 Birdha 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Mahrauni 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 Mandawara 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 4.2 4.2 4.2 5.1 5.1 Total 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.8 3.8                     Number of beds available in Allopathic hospitals and primary health centres per lacs population Block Name 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Bar 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 18.4 18.4 18.4 18.4 32.2 Birdha 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 17.9 17.9 17.9 17.9 12.8 Mahrauni 52.1 52.1 52.1 52.1 39.1 39.1 39.1 39.1 39.1 Mandawara 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 27.0 Total 30.5 30.5 30.5 30.5 23.1 23.1 23.1 23.1 27.8 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab3.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0102    http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab3.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0304   http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab3.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0506   http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab3.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0708   http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab3.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0910        Table 13: District wise Percent of Total Workers in Different Activities District wise 1991 % of Main Workers in Different activities No. of % of Total District Animal husbandry/ Non- Transport, Main Marginal Agricultural Mining and Construction Trade and Other Total Workers in Name Farmers forestry / tree Household hous storage and workers workers labourers quarrying work commerce workers workers total Population plantation ehold communication Bar 64.33 5.68 0.36 0.01 1.30 0.46 0.25 1.34 0.29 1.84 75.86 24.14 45187 45.14  Birdha 54.67 8.78 0.76 3.28 0.64 0.38 0.73 1.21 0.67 1.64 72.76 27.24 51932 44.59  Mahrauni 61.59 7.00 0.60 0.02 0.67 0.52 0.33 1.41 0.28 2.67 75.10 24.90 41073 42.80  Mandawara 55.25 7.57 1.05 1.34 0.86 0.68 0.14 2.17 0.48 1.99 71.53 28.47 42207 45.80  Total 58.80 7.32 0.69 1.27 0.86 0.50 0.38 1.51 0.44 2.01 73.78 26.22 180399 44.58  Total District 55.30 8.04 0.91 0.85 1.13 1.52 1.22 3.19 1.35 4.71 78.22 21.78 314644 41.84  Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab8.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0001                                       Block wise 2001 % of Main Workers in Different activities No. of % of Total District Animal husbandry/ Non- Transport, Main Marginal Agricultural Mining and Construction Trade and Other Total Workers in Name Farmers forestry / tree Household hous storage and workers workers labourers quarrying work commerce workers workers total Population plantation ehold communication Bar 52.99   4.69   0.00   0.00   1.76   0.00   0.00   0.00  0.00  4.18  63.62  36.38  64935  49.79  Birdha 51.39  5.02  0.00  0.00  1.23  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  11.32  68.96  31.04  69824  44.72    65 Mahrauni 47.53  3.83  0.00  0.00  0.81  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  5.68  57.84  42.16  58895  46.10  Mandawara 47.45  6.19  0.00  0.00  1.62  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  7.16  62.41  37.59  56526  47.76  Total 50.00  4.92  0.00  0.00  1.36  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  7.20  63.48  36.52  250180  46.97  Total District 46.96  4.94  0.00  0.00  1.97  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  14.59  68.46  31.54  422365  43.20  Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab8.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0910      Table 14: No. of families below poverty line           No. of families below poverty Number of families No. of families below Name of Block BPL Families (%) Number of families (2001) BPL Families (%) line (1997-98) (1991) poverty line (2002) Bar 6143 17751 34.61 7903 21549 36.67 Birdha 7246 19885 36.44 10037 25947 38.68 Mahrauni 5151 16663 30.91 7108 21126 33.65 Mandawara 5861 16147 36.30 9527 19851 47.99 Total 24401 70446 34.64 34575 88473 39.08 Total District 49863 132370 37.67 56144 166012 33.82 http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/e http://updes.up.nic.in/spat http://updes.up.nic.in/s http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engsp ngspatrika/tab4.asp?formd=40+ rika/engspatrika/tab7.asp? patrika/engspatrika/tab atrika/tab7.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++ Source: Lalitpur+++++++++++++++++ formd=40+Lalitpur+++++ 4.asp?formd=40+Lalitpu ++++++++++++++++++++&formy=091 +++++&formy=0001 +++++++++++++++++& r+++++++++++++++++++ 0  formy=0001 +++&formy=0910    Table 15: Blockwise Cropping Intensity in the district (in hectares) Blockwise 2000-01 Block Name Gross area sown Net area sown Cropping Intensity (in Ha) Bar 53432 37312 143.2 Birdha 72915 58309 125.0 Mahrauni 54305 43946 123.6 Mandawara 46059 36851 125.0 Total 226711 176418 128.5 Total District 339692 253219 134.1 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab17.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0102 Blockwise 2001-02 Block Name Gross area sown Net area sown Cropping Intensity (in Ha) Bar 55745 38649 144.2 Birdha 74268 57345 129.5 Mahrauni 55968 44943 124.5 Mandawara 45223 36488 123.9 Total 231204 177425 130.3 Total District 341544 255221 133.8 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab17.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0203 Blockwise 2002-03 Block Name Gross area sown Net area sown Cropping Intensity (in Ha) Bar 51841 35693 145.2 Birdha 70363 54388 129.4 Mahrauni 52061 41984 124.0 Mandawara 41318 33531 123.2 Total 215583 165596 130.2 Total District 318114 237480 134.0 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab17.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0304   66 Blockwise 2003-04 Block Name Gross area sown Net area sown Cropping Intensity (in Ha) Bar 59376 40071 148.2 Birdha 89307 60650 147.2 Mahrauni 64965 47175 137.7 Mandawara 49187 37952 129.6 Total 262835 185848 141.4 Total District 385426 265712 145.1 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab17.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0405 Blockwise 2004-05 Block Name Gross area sown Net area sown Cropping Intensity (in Ha) Bar 65369 42669 153.2 Birdha 89246 61992 144.0 Mahrauni 66940 51621 129.7 Mandawara 51624 39142 131.9 Total 273179 195424 139.8 Total District 401115 277994 144.3 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab17.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0506 Blockwise 2005-06 Block Name Gross area sown Net area sown Cropping Intensity (in Ha) Bar 63289 43025 147.1 Birdha 74442 61490 121.1 Mahrauni 55178 46058 119.8 Mandawara 44002 32402 135.8 Total 236911 182975 129.5 Total District 362209 267863 135.2 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab17.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0607 Blockwise 2006-07 Block Name Gross area sown Net area sown Cropping Intensity (in Ha) Bar 61127 40208 152.0 Birdha 83384 62517 133.4 Mahrauni 56439 47198 119.6 Mandawara 44513 33435 133.1 Total 245463 183358 133.9 Total District 377348 270273 139.6 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab17.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0708 Blockwise 2007-08 Block Name Gross area sown Net area sown Cropping Intensity (in Ha) Bar 41577 35622 116.7 Birdha 85651 57606 148.7 Mahrauni 58927 47010 125.3 Mandawara 47261 37027 127.6 Total Rural 348214 254766 136.7 Total 540053 396409 136.2 Total District 348214 254766 136.7 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab17.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0809 Blockwise 2008-09 Block Name Gross area sown Net area sown Cropping Intensity (in Ha) Bar 75013 44165 169.8 Birdha 92133 61553 149.7   67 Mahrauni 73977 52346 141.3 Mandawara 55019 39898 137.9 Total 296142 197962 149.6 Total District 438560 285426 153.7 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab17.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0910   Blockwise 2002-03 Rice kharif Rice jayad Total rice Wheat Barley Block Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Bar 1349 0 0 0 1349 0 12614 12174 1496 1493 Birdha 499 0 0 0 499 0 13481 12285 409 384 Mahrauni 945 0 0 0 945 0 9216 9012 468 464 Mandawara 993 0 0 0 993 0 7156 7147 249 249 Total 3786 0 0 0 3786 0 42467 40618 2622 2590 Total District 5529 0 0 0 5529 0 76896 72814 4546 4455   Jwar Millet Maize kharif Maize jayad Total Maize Marhuva Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 84 0 0 0 5708 0 0 0 5708 0 0 0 679 0 0 0 1604 0 0 0 1604 0 0 0 1718 0 0 0 611 0 0 0 611 0 0 0 1132 0 1 0 742 0 0 0 742 0 0 0 3613 0 1 0 8665 0 0 0 8665 0 0 0 3827 0 1 0 23535 0 0 0 23535 0 0 0   Sanva kharif Sanva jayad Total sanva Koda Cocoon Kutki Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 53 0 0 0 53 0 90 0 0 0 5 0 11 0 0 0 11 0 83 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 19 0 187 0 0 0 4 0 32 0 0 0 32 0 264 0 5 0 13 0 115 0 0 0 115 0 624 0 5 0 22 0 153 0 0 0 153 0 735 0 5 0 31 0   Total dhaan Urad kharif Urad jayad Total urad Moong kharif Moong jayad Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 21399 13667 14450 0 0 0 14450 0 248 0 40 40 16766 12669 3457 0 47 47 3504 47 458 0 12 12 13168 9476 17612 0 22 22 17634 22 603 0 0 0 10587 7396 11961 5 0 0 11961 5 107 1 0 0 61920 43208 47480 5 69 69 47549 74 1416 1 52 52 115258 77269 77509 5 69 69 77578 74 2501 1 105 105   Total moong Masur Gram Pea Arhar Moth Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 288 40 2110 2068 3906 3424 6570 6283 1 0 0 0 470 12 7672 5764 15589 13141 6079 5601 1 0 0 0 603 0 5686 5286 6725 6650 9097 8870 62 0 0 0 107 1 4488 3484 9785 7454 6091 5233 16 0 0 0 1468 53 19956 16602 36005 30669 27837 25987 80 0 0 0   68 2606 106 22328 18674 48548 40542 35460 33465 80 0 0 0     Total pulses Total grains Lahi/Sarson Alsi Til Rendi Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 27325 11815 48724 25482 152 137 15 0 731 0 0 0 33315 24565 50081 37234 26 15 10 4 480 0 0 0 39807 20828 52975 30304 32 30 28 5 98 0 0 0 32448 16177 43035 23573 23 17 56 0 145 0 0 0 132895 73385 194815 116593 233 199 109 9 1454 0 0 0 186600 92861 301858 170130 329 287 122 12 2591 0 0 0   Groundnut Sunflower Soyabean Total oilseeds Sugarcane Potato Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 1038 0 0 0 1092 0 3028 137 22 22 25 25 288 0 0 0 526 0 1330 19 10 10 114 114 49 0 0 0 547 0 754 35 2 2 21 21 71 0 0 0 555 0 850 17 20 20 20 20 1446 0 0 0 2720 0 5962 208 54 54 180 180 6230 1 8 3 3799 22 13079 325 126 126 297 297     Onion Other vegetables Tobacco Jute Cotton Sanai Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 7 7 328 220 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 60 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 510 425 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 40 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 27 938 715 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 61 1875 1438 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   Turmeric Total Rabi fodder Total Kharif fodder Total Jayad fodder Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 0 0 4 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 22 15 0 0 0 0 0 32 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 61 15 0 1 1 1 0 107 107 19 1 7 7   Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab19.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0102   69   Blockwise 2001-02 Rice kharif Rice jayad Total rice Wheat Barley Block Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Bar 1538 0 0 0 1538 0 14608 14563 1910 1905 Birdha 623 0 0 0 623 0 18473 14674 617 532 Mahrauni 1248 0 0 0 1248 0 12208 11401 469 455 Mandawara 1108 0 0 0 1108 0 12148 9536 250 195 Total 4517 0 0 0 4517 0 57437 50174 3246 3087 Total District 7435 2 0 0 7435 2 94847 87148 5791 5588   Jwar Millet Maize kharif Maize jayad Total Maize Marhuva Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 90 0 3 0 6143 0 0 0 6143 0 0 0 1129 0 0 0 2044 0 0 0 2044 0 0 0 2168 0 48 0 831 0 0 0 831 0 0 0 1349 0 117 0 968 0 0 0 968 0 0 0 4736 0 168 0 9986 0 0 0 9986 0 0 0 4955 0 168 0 26176 0 1 1 26177 1 0 0   Sanva kharif Sanva jayad Total sanva Koda Cocoon Kutki Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 80 0 0 0 80 0 177 0 0 0 13 0 13 0 0 0 13 0 103 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 38 0 289 0 0 0 13 0 29 0 0 0 29 0 332 0 0 0 38 0 160 0 0 0 160 0 901 0 0 0 64 0 206 0 0 0 206 0 1068 0 0 0 64 0   Total dhaan Urad kharif Urad jayad Total urad Moong kharif Moong jayad Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 24562 16468 10418 0 0 0 10418 0 500 0 49 49 23002 15206 15537 0 0 0 15537 0 482 0 207 207 17312 11856 5051 0 165 165 5216 165 842 0 0 0 16339 9731 5068 0 50 50 5118 50 357 0 0 0 81215 53261 36074 0 215 215 36289 215 2181 0 256 256 140711 92739 55956 0 215 215 56171 215 4364 0 377 377     Total moong Masur Gram Pea Arhar Moth Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 549 49 3090 2678 4042 3643 6225 5692 0 0 0 0 689 207 10978 7669 15726 10154 5733 5110 0 0 0 0 842 0 10516 9736 6864 5260 8751 8379 32 0 0 0 357 0 5124 3912 9922 6049 5745 4742 6 0 0 0 2437 256 29708 23995 36554 25106 26454 23923 38 0 0 0 4741 377 33202 27073 49369 36001 33387 30518 38 0 0 0     70   Total pulses Total grains Lahi/Sarson Alsi Til Rendi Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 24324 12062 48886 28530 184 86 6 0 948 0 0 0 48663 23140 71665 38346 25 4 78 2 640 0 0 0 32221 23540 49533 35396 48 15 206 0 238 0 0 0 26272 14753 42611 24484 56 15 248 1 162 0 0 0 131480 73495 212695 126756 313 120 538 3 1988 0 0 0 176908 94184 317619 186923 427 220 601 4 3492 0 0 0     Groundnut Sunflower Soyabean Total oilseeds Sugarcane Potato Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 1031 0 0 0 1773 0 3942 86 40 40 17 17 101 0 0 0 175 0 1019 6 10 10 101 101 53 0 0 0 2301 0 2846 15 9 9 11 11 97 0 0 0 1863 0 2426 16 27 27 10 10 1282 0 0 0 6112 0 10233 123 86 86 139 139 8164 0 40 4 7766 0 20490 228 170 170 315 315   Onion Other vegetables Tobacco Jute Cotton Sanai Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0     Turmeric Total Rabi fodder Total Kharif fodder Total Jayad fodder Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 0 0 4 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 21 11 0 0 0 0 0 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 58 11 0 1 1 1 1 101 101 13 0 13 13 Source:  http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab19.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0203    Blockwise 2002-03 Rice kharif Rice jayad Total rice Wheat Barley Block Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Bar 1349 0 0 0 1349 0 12614 12174 1496 1493 Birdha 499 0 0 0 499 0 13481 12285 409 384 Mahrauni 945 0 0 0 945 0 9216 9012 468 464 Mandawara 993 0 0 0 993 0 7156 7147 249 249 Total 3786 0 0 0 3786 0 42467 40618 2622 2590 Total District 5529 0 0 0 5529 0 76896 72814 4546 4455     71   Jwar Millet Maize kharif Maize jayad Total Maize Marhuva Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 84 0 0 0 5708 0 0 0 5708 0 0 0 679 0 0 0 1604 0 0 0 1604 0 0 0 1718 0 0 0 611 0 0 0 611 0 0 0 1132 0 1 0 742 0 0 0 742 0 0 0 3613 0 1 0 8665 0 0 0 8665 0 0 0 3827 0 1 0 23535 0 0 0 23535 0 0 0   Sanva kharif Sanva jayad Total sanva Koda Cocoon Kutki Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 53 0 0 0 53 0 90 0 0 0 5 0 11 0 0 0 11 0 83 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 19 0 187 0 0 0 4 0 32 0 0 0 32 0 264 0 5 0 13 0 115 0 0 0 115 0 624 0 5 0 22 0 153 0 0 0 153 0 735 0 5 0 31 0     Total dhaan Urad kharif Urad jayad Total urad Moong kharif Moong jayad Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 21399 13667 14450 0 0 0 14450 0 248 0 40 40 16766 12669 3457 0 47 47 3504 47 458 0 12 12 13168 9476 17612 0 22 22 17634 22 603 0 0 0 10587 7396 11961 5 0 0 11961 5 107 1 0 0 61920 43208 47480 5 69 69 47549 74 1416 1 52 52 115258 77269 77509 5 69 69 77578 74 2501 1 105 105   Total moong Masur Gram Pea Arhar Moth Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 288 40 2110 2068 3906 3424 6570 6283 1 0 0 0 470 12 7672 5764 15589 13141 6079 5601 1 0 0 0 603 0 5686 5286 6725 6650 9097 8870 62 0 0 0 107 1 4488 3484 9785 7454 6091 5233 16 0 0 0 1468 53 19956 16602 36005 30669 27837 25987 80 0 0 0 2606 106 22328 18674 48548 40542 35460 33465 80 0 0 0     Total pulses Total grains Lahi/Sarson Alsi Til Rendi Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 27325 11815 48724 25482 152 137 15 0 731 0 0 0 33315 24565 50081 37234 26 15 10 4 480 0 0 0 39807 20828 52975 30304 32 30 28 5 98 0 0 0 32448 16177 43035 23573 23 17 56 0 145 0 0 0 132895 73385 194815 116593 233 199 109 9 1454 0 0 0 186600 92861 301858 170130 329 287 122 12 2591 0 0 0   Groundnut Sunflower Soyabean Total oilseeds Sugarcane Potato Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated   72 1038 0 0 0 1092 0 3028 137 22 22 25 25 288 0 0 0 526 0 1330 19 10 10 114 114 49 0 0 0 547 0 754 35 2 2 21 21 71 0 0 0 555 0 850 17 20 20 20 20 1446 0 0 0 2720 0 5962 208 54 54 180 180 6230 1 8 3 3799 22 13079 325 126 126 297 297     Onion Other vegetables Tobacco Jute Cotton Sanai Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 7 7 328 220 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 60 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 510 425 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 40 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 27 938 715 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 61 1875 1438 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   Turmeric Total Rabi fodder Total Kharif fodder Total Jayad fodder Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 0 0 4 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 22 15 0 0 0 0 0 32 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 61 15 0 1 1 1 0 107 107 19 1 7 7 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab19.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0203    Blockwise 2002-03 Rice kharif Rice jayad Total rice Wheat Barley Block Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Bar 1349 0 0 0 1349 0 12614 12174 1496 1493 Birdha 499 0 0 0 499 0 13481 12285 409 384 Mahrauni 945 0 0 0 945 0 9216 9012 468 464 Mandawara 993 0 0 0 993 0 7156 7147 249 249 Total 3786 0 0 0 3786 0 42467 40618 2622 2590 Total District 5529 0 0 0 5529 0 76896 72814 4546 4455   Jwar Millet Maize kharif Maize jayad Total Maize Marhuva   73 Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 84 0 0 0 5708 0 0 0 5708 0 0 0 679 0 0 0 1604 0 0 0 1604 0 0 0 1718 0 0 0 611 0 0 0 611 0 0 0 1132 0 1 0 742 0 0 0 742 0 0 0 3613 0 1 0 8665 0 0 0 8665 0 0 0 3827 0 1 0 23535 0 0 0 23535 0 0 0   Sanva kharif Sanva jayad Total sanva Koda Cocoon Kutki Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 53 0 0 0 53 0 90 0 0 0 5 0 11 0 0 0 11 0 83 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 19 0 187 0 0 0 4 0 32 0 0 0 32 0 264 0 5 0 13 0 115 0 0 0 115 0 624 0 5 0 22 0 153 0 0 0 153 0 735 0 5 0 31 0   Total dhaan Urad kharif Urad jayad Total urad Moong kharif Moong jayad Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 21399 13667 14450 0 0 0 14450 0 248 0 40 40 16766 12669 3457 0 47 47 3504 47 458 0 12 12 13168 9476 17612 0 22 22 17634 22 603 0 0 0 10587 7396 11961 5 0 0 11961 5 107 1 0 0 61920 43208 47480 5 69 69 47549 74 1416 1 52 52 115258 77269 77509 5 69 69 77578 74 2501 1 105 105     Total moong Masur Gram Pea Arhar Moth Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 288 40 2110 2068 3906 3424 6570 6283 1 0 0 0 470 12 7672 5764 15589 13141 6079 5601 1 0 0 0 603 0 5686 5286 6725 6650 9097 8870 62 0 0 0 107 1 4488 3484 9785 7454 6091 5233 16 0 0 0 1468 53 19956 16602 36005 30669 27837 25987 80 0 0 0 2606 106 22328 18674 48548 40542 35460 33465 80 0 0 0   Total pulses Total grains Lahi/Sarson Alsi Til Rendi Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 27325 11815 48724 25482 152 137 15 0 731 0 0 0 33315 24565 50081 37234 26 15 10 4 480 0 0 0 39807 20828 52975 30304 32 30 28 5 98 0 0 0 32448 16177 43035 23573 23 17 56 0 145 0 0 0 132895 73385 194815 116593 233 199 109 9 1454 0 0 0 186600 92861 301858 170130 329 287 122 12 2591 0 0 0               74 Groundnut Sunflower Soyabean Total oilseeds Sugarcane Potato Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 1038 0 0 0 1092 0 3028 137 22 22 25 25 288 0 0 0 526 0 1330 19 10 10 114 114 49 0 0 0 547 0 754 35 2 2 21 21 71 0 0 0 555 0 850 17 20 20 20 20 1446 0 0 0 2720 0 5962 208 54 54 180 180 6230 1 8 3 3799 22 13079 325 126 126 297 297   Onion Other vegetables Tobacco Jute Cotton Sanai Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 7 7 328 220 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 60 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 510 425 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 40 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 27 938 715 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 61 1875 1438 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0     Turmeric Total Rabi fodder Total Kharif fodder Total Jayad fodder Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 0 0 4 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 22 15 0 0 0 0 0 32 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 61 15 0 1 1 1 0 107 107 19 1 7 7   Blockwise 2003-04 Rice kharif Rice jayad Total rice Wheat Barley Block Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Bar 1488 0 0 0 1488 0 15897 15897 1850 1844 Birdha 428 0 0 0 428 0 20618 18773 579 553 Mahrauni 920 0 0 0 920 0 15283 14690 517 479 Mandawara 931 0 0 0 931 0 10766 9567 304 265 Total 3767 0 0 0 3767 0 62564 58927 3250 3141 Total District 6004 0 0 0 6004 0 98336 94612 5842 5728     Jwar Millet Maize kharif Maize jayad Total Maize Marhuva Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 486 0 0 0 6945 0 0 0 6945 0 0 0 2118 0 0 0 4616 0 0 0 4616 0 0 0 1560 0 0 0 1047 0 0 0 1047 0 0 0 1919 0 1 0 1260 0 0 0 1260 0 0 0 6083 0 1 0 13868 0 0 0 13868 0 0 0 7541 0 1 0 28856 0 0 0 28856 0 0 0         75 Sanva kharif Sanva jayad Total sanva Koda Cocoon Kutki Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 92 0 0 0 92 0 129 0 0 0 4 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 26 0 172 0 0 0 4 0 48 0 1 1 49 1 297 0 5 0 39 0 171 0 1 1 172 1 598 0 5 0 47 0 209 0 1 1 210 1 721 0 5 0 47 0   Total dhaan    Urad kharif  Urad jayad  Total urad  Moong kharif  Moong jayad  Total  Irrigated  Total  Irrigated  Total  Irrigated  Total  Irrigated  Total  Irrigated  Total  Irrigated  26891 17741 13457 0 0 0 13457 0 536 0 10 10 28364 19326 27142 0 30 30 27172 30 586 0 58 58 19529 15169 16682 0 1 1 16683 1 788 0 9 9 15571 9833 10761 0 0 0 10761 0 402 0 61 61 90355 62069 68042 0 31 31 68073 31 2312 0 138 138 147563 100341 97702 0 31 31 97733 31 3841 0 307 307   Total moong Masur Gram Pea Arhar Moth Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 546 10 2110 2098 4694 4671 8768 8713 11 0 0 0 644 58 7535 5797 17207 14388 7915 7657 0 0 0 0 797 9 5618 5316 9483 8678 12354 12126 0 0 0 0 463 61 4418 3514 5301 2942 6936 6174 16 0 0 0 2450 138 19681 16725 36685 30679 35973 34670 27 0 0 0 4148 307 21916 18856 49561 43046 45721 44225 27 0 0 0   Total pulses Total grains Lahi/Sarson Alsi Til Rendi Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 29586 15492 56477 33233 380 377 12 0 1019 0 0 0 60473 27930 88837 47256 26 25 7 0 482 0 0 0 44935 26130 64464 41299 84 69 26 8 353 0 0 0 27895 12691 43466 22524 40 19 54 5 239 0 0 0 162889 82243 253244 144312 530 490 99 13 2093 0 0 0 219106 106465 366669 206806 682 636 108 22 3869 0 0 0   Groundnut Sunflower Soyabean Total oilseeds Sugarcane Potato Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 717 0 0 0 1104 0 3232 377 20 20 37 37 99 0 3 0 147 0 764 25 1 1 151 151 43 0 0 0 415 0 921 77 1 1 28 28 68 0 6 1 842 0 1249 25 5 5 20 20 927 0 9 1 2508 0 6166 504 27 27 236 236 6702 0 9 1 3514 0 14884 659 93 93 422 422         76   Onion Other vegetables Tobacco Jute Cotton Sanai Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 7 7 309 244 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 381 302 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 15 148 143 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 143 106 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 35 981 795 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 99 2354 1718 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0     Turmeric Total Rabi fodder Total Kharif fodder Total Jayad fodder Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   Blockwise 2004-05 Rice kharif Rice jayad Total rice Wheat Barley Block Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Bar 1335 0 0 0 1335 0 16140 16140 1403 1399 Birdha 497 0 0 0 497 0 18781 16979 626 604 Mahrauni 926 0 0 0 926 0 14539 14022 521 483 Mandawara 994 0 0 0 994 0 10652 9432 233 225 Total 3752 0 0 0 3752 0 60112 56573 2783 2711 Total District 5668 0 0 0 5668 0 95863 92235 5257 5176     Jwar Millet Maize kharif Maize jayad Total Maize Marhuva Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 441 0 0 0 7688 0 0 0 7688 0 0 0 1349 0 0 0 6071 0 0 0 6071 0 0 0 1331 0 0 0 1205 0 0 0 1205 0 0 0 1989 0 0 0 1478 0 0 0 1478 0 0 0 5110 0 0 0 16442 0 0 0 16442 0 0 0 5342 0 0 0 33374 0 0 0 33374 0 0 0     Sanva kharif Sanva jayad Total sanva Koda Cocoon Kutki Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 76 0 0 0 76 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 21 0 169 0 0 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 35 0 294 0 0 0 0 0 134 0 0 0 134 0 584 0 0 0 0 0 195 0 1 1 196 1 1161 0 0 0 0 0     77   Total dhaan Urad kharif Urad jayad Total urad Moong kharif Moong jayad Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 27179 17539 13235 0 1 1 13236 1 521 0 7 7 27351 17583 21142 0 0 0 21142 0 731 0 26 26 18712 14505 16297 0 0 0 16297 0 876 0 4 4 15675 9657 10547 0 0 0 10547 0 380 0 55 55 88917 59284 61221 0 1 1 61222 1 2508 0 92 92 146861 97412 88620 0 3 3 88623 3 4139 0 129 129   Total moong Masur Gram Pea Arhar Moth Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 528 7 2415 2357 3559 3539 11675 11589 1 0 0 0 757 26 13379 10780 12621 10781 10572 10360 1 0 0 0 880 4 7465 7177 8159 7442 12982 12750 0 0 0 0 435 55 5836 4923 8046 6462 8778 8178 20 0 0 0 2600 92 29095 25237 32385 28224 44007 42877 22 0 0 0 4268 129 33321 29303 41570 37095 58020 56674 22 0 0 0   Total pulses Total grains Lahi/Sarson Alsi Til Rendi Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 31414 17493 58593 35032 1569 1530 15 0 2098 0 0 0 58472 31947 85823 49530 146 140 14 1 1926 0 0 0 45783 27373 64495 41878 254 170 40 8 870 0 0 0 33662 19618 49337 29275 104 57 133 2 464 0 0 0 169331 96431 258248 155715 2073 1897 202 11 5358 0 0 0 225824 123204 372685 220616 2948 2685 232 37 8130 0 0 0   Groundnut Sunflower Soyabean Total oilseeds Sugarcane Potato Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 870 0 0 0 1733 0 6285 1530 14 14 45 45 120 0 0 0 727 0 2933 141 0 0 88 88 49 0 0 0 690 0 1903 178 2 2 69 69 71 0 0 0 1197 0 1969 59 16 16 18 18 1110 0 0 0 4347 0 13090 1908 32 32 220 220 6933 0 6 1 5968 0 24217 2723 104 104 391 391   Onion Other vegetables Tobacco Jute Cotton Sanai Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 5 5 289 235 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 3 350 273 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 34 34 271 271 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 124 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 45 45 1034 875 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 115 115 2623 2052 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0             78 Turmeric Total Rabi fodder Total Kharif fodder Total Jayad fodder Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 2 1 13 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 58 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 73 73 26 0 0 0 6 4 121 121 54 0 1 1 Source:http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab19.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0506    Blockwise 2005-06 Rice kharif Rice jayad Total rice Wheat Barley Block Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Bar 1102 0 0 0 1102 0 18269 18269 1859 1859 Birdha 257 0 0 0 257 0 17343 16600 744 726 Mahrauni 416 0 0 0 416 0 14390 13294 387 384 Mandawara 456 0 0 0 456 0 9914 9021 302 296 Total 2231 0 0 0 2231 0 59916 57184 3292 3265 Total District 4017 0 0 0 4017 0 97723 94923 6287 6253   Jwar Millet Maize kharif Maize jayad Total Maize Marhuva Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 175 0 0 0 6491 0 0 0 6491 0 0 0 164 0 1 0 3411 0 0 0 3411 0 0 0 307 0 0 0 687 0 0 0 687 0 0 0 559 0 0 0 1189 0 0 0 1189 0 0 0 1205 0 1 0 11778 0 0 0 11778 0 0 0 1258 0 1 0 28089 0 0 0 28089 0 0 0     Sanva kharif Sanva jayad Total sanva Koda Cocoon Kutki Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 54 0 0 0 54 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 12 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 0 127 0 0 0 0 0 79 0 0 0 79 0 261 0 0 0 0 0 112 0 0 0 112 0 322 0 0 0 0 0   Total dhaan Urad kharif Urad jayad Total urad Moong kharif Moong jayad Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 28025 20128 10610 0 12 12 10622 12 450 0 61 61 21934 17326 9395 0 4 4 9399 4 463 0 4 4 16249 13678 6327 0 2 2 6329 2 307 0 8 8 12555 9317 5833 0 0 0 5833 0 190 0 0 0 78763 60449 32165 0 18 18 32183 18 1410 0 73 73 137809 101176 53162 0 20 20 53182 20 2411 0 245 245         79   Total moong Masur Gram Pea Arhar Moth Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 511 61 2485 2477 3048 3039 5815 5809 0 0 0 0 467 4 17066 14506 9846 8976 13873 13363 0 0 0 0 315 8 9708 9029 5252 4498 16435 16028 0 0 0 0 190 0 6096 5117 6216 5236 17410 16709 8 0 0 0 1483 73 35355 31129 24362 21749 53533 51909 8 0 0 0 2656 245 40753 36347 31563 28690 71177 69334 8 0 0 0   Total pulses Total grains Lahi/Sarson Alsi Til Rendi Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 22481 11398 50506 31526 1924 1918 36 24 1884 0 0 0 50651 36853 72585 54179 243 222 26 4 752 0 0 0 38039 29565 54288 43243 85 81 19 5 299 0 0 0 35753 27062 48308 36379 122 80 63 3 298 0 0 0 146924 104878 225687 165327 2374 2301 144 36 3233 0 0 0 199339 134636 337148 235812 3507 3367 181 58 5446 0 0 0   Groundnut Sunflower Soyabean Total oilseeds Sugarcane Potato Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 1095 0 0 0 1310 0 6249 1942 12 12 51 51 194 0 0 0 248 0 1463 226 0 0 77 77 5 0 0 0 261 0 669 86 5 5 58 58 43 0 0 0 797 0 1323 83 9 9 23 23 1337 0 0 0 2616 0 9704 2337 26 26 209 209 8203 0 0 0 3695 0 21032 3425 107 107 403 403   Onion Other vegetables Tobacco Jute Cotton Sanai Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 6 6 350 280 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 8 8 361 290 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 30 235 203 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 5 101 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 49 49 1047 864 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 146 146 2708 2177 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0   Turmeric Total Rabi fodder Total Kharif fodder Total Jayad fodder Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 0 0 21 21 15 2 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 61 23 6 0 0 0 0 4 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 89 89 41 8 0 0 2 2 143 143 70 17 1 1 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab19.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0607            80   Blockwise 2006-07 Rice kharif Rice jayad Total rice Wheat Barley Block Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Bar 926 0 0 0 926 0 16551 16545 2182 2182 Birdha 299 0 0 0 299 0 17983 17373 703 693 Mahrauni 304 0 0 0 304 0 15071 14153 455 449 Mandawara 389 0 0 0 389 0 10252 9598 314 311 Total 1918 0 0 0 1918 0 59857 57669 3654 3635 Total District 3704 1 5 5 3709 6 100875 98613 6904 6883     Jwar Millet Maize kharif Maize jayad Total Maize Marhuva Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 207 0 0 0 7261 0 0 0 7261 0 0 0 209 0 0 0 5625 0 0 0 5625 0 0 0 320 0 0 0 652 0 0 0 652 0 0 0 653 0 0 0 1125 0 0 0 1125 0 0 0 1389 0 0 0 14663 0 0 0 14663 0 0 0 1430 0 0 0 33200 0 1 1 33201 1 0 0   Sanva kharif Sanva jayad Total sanva Koda Cocoon Kutki Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 52 0 0 0 52 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 17 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 19 0 141 0 0 0 0 0 91 0 0 0 91 0 253 0 0 0 0 0 127 0 0 0 127 0 278 0 0 0 0 0     Total dhaan Urad kharif Urad jayad Total urad Moong kharif Moong jayad Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 27225 18727 10996 0 50 50 11046 50 468 0 71 71 24834 18066 13816 0 12 12 13828 12 640 0 7 7 16873 14602 5851 0 0 0 5851 0 342 0 1 1 12893 9909 5591 0 3 3 5594 3 213 0 10 10 81825 61304 36254 0 65 65 36319 65 1663 0 89 89 146524 105503 58880 0 162 162 59042 162 2891 0 186 186   Total moong Masur Gram Pea Arhar Moth Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 539 71 2395 2371 2688 2684 10353 10338 0 0 0 0 647 7 16249 13913 9061 8476 15635 15453 10 0 0 0 343 1 9805 9093 5530 5080 16863 16318 0 0 0 0 223 10 5988 5243 6312 5319 11982 11458 0 0 0 0 1752 89 34437 30620 23591 21559 54833 53567 10 0 0 0 3077 186 39911 36002 30272 28135 69903 68580 15 0 0 0       81 Total pulses Total grains Lahi/Sarson Alsi Til Rendi Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 27021 15514 54246 34241 1471 1469 3 3 2203 0 0 0 55430 37861 80264 55927 110 107 19 5 1559 0 0 0 38392 30492 55265 45094 150 112 21 4 299 0 0 0 30099 22033 42992 31942 88 25 35 5 311 0 0 0 150942 105900 232767 167204 1819 1713 78 17 4372 0 0 0 202220 133065 348744 238568 2993 2866 83 21 7632 0 0 0   Groundnut Sunflower Soyabean Total oilseeds Sugarcane Potato Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 1362 0 0 0 1252 0 6291 1472 16 16 45 45 226 0 0 0 682 0 2596 112 3 3 86 86 8 0 0 0 256 0 734 116 13 13 54 54 47 0 0 0 786 0 1267 30 15 15 19 19 1643 0 0 0 2976 0 10888 1730 47 47 204 204 9282 13 5 0 4240 0 24235 2900 169 169 391 391   Onion Other vegetables Tobacco Jute Cotton Sanai Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 13 13 346 281 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 4 4 380 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 29 229 189 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 7 123 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 53 53 1078 877 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 136 136 2845 2266 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0   Turmeric Total Rabi fodder Total Kharif fodder Total Jayad fodder Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 0 0 24 24 0 0 0 0 2 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 86 56 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 115 115 56 0 0 0 2 2 160 160 56 0 2 2 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab19.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0708      Blockwise 2007-08 Rice kharif Rice jayad Total rice Wheat Barley Block Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Bar 1002 0 0 0 1002 0 4630 4630 395 395 Birdha 346 0 0 0 346 0 15944 15548 564 553 Mahrauni 329 0 0 0 329 0 12114 12110 510 507 Mandawara 329 0 0 0 329 0 8554 8239 274 263 Total 2006 0 0 0 2006 0 41242 40527 1743 1718 Total District 3344 0 0 0 3344 0 66762 65865 3866 3841         82 Jwar Millet Maize kharif Maize jayad Total Maize Marhuva Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 493 0 0 0 9415 0 0 0 9415 0 0 0 378 0 0 0 6839 0 0 0 6839 0 0 0 1526 0 0 0 1282 0 0 0 1282 0 0 0 930 0 85 0 1811 0 0 0 1811 0 0 0 3327 0 85 0 19347 0 0 0 19347 0 0 0 3373 0 85 0 39769 0 0 0 39769 0 0 0   Sanva kharif Sanva jayad Total sanva Koda Cocoon Kutki Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 40 0 0 0 40 0 77 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 14 0 150 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 0 0 65 0 292 0 0 0 0 0 103 0 0 0 103 0 342 0 0 0 0 0   Total dhaan Urad kharif Urad jayad Total urad Moong kharif Moong jayad Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 16052 5025 15788 0 0 0 15788 0 542 0 2 2 24088 16101 26589 0 1 1 26590 1 829 0 1 1 15820 12617 16584 0 0 0 16584 0 652 0 0 0 12147 8502 11812 0 2 2 11814 2 629 0 0 0 68107 42245 70773 0 3 3 70776 3 2652 0 3 3 117644 69706 100991 0 5 5 100996 5 3874 0 6 6   Total moong Masur Gram Pea Arhar Moth Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 544 2 261 261 268 268 1127 1127 0 0 0 0 830 1 11280 9491 7972 7356 12087 11755 0 0 0 0 652 0 5557 5481 6031 5974 11357 11322 0 0 0 0 629 0 4845 4621 4733 4358 10349 9974 54 0 0 0 2655 3 21943 19854 19004 17956 34920 34178 54 0 0 0 3880 6 25364 23157 23513 22282 45205 44284 54 0 0 0   Total pulses Total grains Lahi/Sarson Alsi Til Rendi Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 17988 1658 34040 6683 172 172 0 0 3915 0 0 0 58759 28604 82847 44705 47 29 5 0 1460 0 0 0 40181 22777 56001 35394 115 108 23 9 759 0 0 0 32424 18955 44571 27457 35 19 7 0 849 0 0 0 149352 71994 217459 114239 369 328 35 9 6983 0 0 0 199012 89734 316656 159440 952 911 43 11 10789 0 0 0     83   Groundnut Sunflower Soyabean Total oilseeds Sugarcane Potato Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 1310 0 0 0 1653 0 7050 172 26 26 18 18 221 0 0 0 721 0 2454 29 1 1 37 37 161 0 25 0 1313 0 2396 117 30 30 31 31 85 0 0 0 1539 0 2515 19 4 4 9 9 1777 0 25 0 5226 0 14415 337 61 61 95 95 9318 0 25 0 6671 0 27798 922 183 182 214 214   Onion Other vegetables Tobacco Jute Cotton Sanai Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 4 4 205 129 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 270 154 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 31 291 174 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 95 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 48 861 535 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 97 2298 1734 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   Turmeric Total Rabi fodder Total Kharif fodder Total Jayad fodder Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 108 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 112 112 0 0 1 1 5 4 133 133 0 0 1 1 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab19.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0809      Blockwise 2008-09 Rice kharif Rice jayad Total rice Wheat Barley Block Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Bar 871 0 0 0 871 0 20277 20273 2497 2497 Birdha 285 0 0 0 285 0 19694 19297 767 754 Mahrauni 290 0 0 0 290 0 15918 15908 741 741 Mandawara 405 0 0 0 405 0 10838 10643 414 405 Total 1851 0 0 0 1851 0 66727 66121 4419 4397 Total District 3503 0 0 0 3503 0 110609 109997 8091 8069     Jwar Millet Maize kharif Maize jayad Total Maize Marhuva Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 551 0 0 0 9738 0 0 0 9738 0 0 0 164 0 0 0 5634 0 0 0 5634 0 0 0 2292 0 0 0 1530 0 0 0 1530 0 0 0 1185 0 0 0 2019 0 0 0 2019 0 0 0 4192 0 0 0 18921 0 0 0 18921 0 0 0 4223 0 0 0 39140 0 0 0 39140 0 0 0   84   Sanva kharif Sanva jayad Total sanva Koda Cocoon Kutki Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 32 0 0 0 32 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 12 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 35 0 128 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 80 0 221 0 0 0 0 0 119 0 0 0 119 0 251 0 0 0 0 0     Total dhaan Urad kharif Urad jayad Total urad Moong kharif Moong jayad Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 34014 22770 15842 0 21 21 15863 21 844 0 36 36 26558 20051 23787 0 16 16 23803 16 674 0 20 20 20815 16649 20143 0 0 0 20143 0 591 0 0 0 15024 11048 12959 0 13 13 12972 13 577 0 5 5 96411 70518 72731 0 50 50 72781 50 2686 0 61 61 165936 118066 102655 0 116 116 102771 116 3910 0 261 261   Total moong Masur Gram Pea Arhar Moth Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 880 36 1870 1825 2795 2795 9337 9316 1 0 0 0 694 20 11906 10340 7183 6678 18424 18168 23 0 0 0 591 0 5924 5923 6667 6667 16078 16078 0 0 0 0 582 5 4745 4530 6248 5764 12503 12306 14 0 0 0 2747 61 24445 22618 22893 21904 56342 55868 38 0 0 0 4171 261 28596 26730 28773 27742 70733 70243 38 0 0 0     Total pulses Total grains Lahi/Sarson Alsi Til Rendi Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 30746 13993 64760 36763 2240 2239 2 0 3587 0 0 0 62033 35222 88591 55273 72 60 0 0 1099 0 0 0 49403 28668 70218 45317 240 237 6 6 979 0 0 0 37064 22618 52088 33666 190 130 0 0 652 0 0 0 179246 100501 275657 171019 2742 2666 8 6 6317 0 0 0 235082 125092 401018 243158 4255 4179 28 23 9846 0 0 0   Groundnut Sunflower Soyabean Total oilseeds Sugarcane Potato Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 1513 0 0 0 2196 0 9538 2239 27 27 70 70 166 0 0 0 1504 0 2841 60 3 3 92 92 26 0 0 0 1982 0 3233 243 23 23 42 42 55 0 0 0 1829 0 2726 130 9 9 14 14 1760 0 0 0 7511 0 18338 2672 62 62 218 218 9762 0 50 0 8789 0 32730 4202 143 140 435 435         85 Onion Other vegetables Tobacco Jute Cotton Sanai Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 78 78 458 391 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 420 322 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 22 292 188 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 134 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 108 1304 991 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 185 185 3128 2529 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   Turmeric Total Rabi fodder Total Kharif fodder Total Jayad fodder Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 4 2 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 48 105 105 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 63 63 105 105 0 0 4 2 94 94 105 105 0 0 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab19.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0910      Table 17: Average production of main crops (quintal/hectare) in the district Name of crops 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Rice Kharif 9.79 7.05 1.11 6.45 3.89 6.17 7.11 2.55 7.42 Jayad 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.11 0 0 Total Rice 9.79 7.05 1.11 6.45 3.89 6.17 7.11 2.55 7.42 Wheat 16.08 18.19 16.45 20.2 19.93 16.24 18.58 15.62 21.49 Barley 11.74 16.22 14.85 16.08 13.14 19.26 18.91 12.61 18.87 Jwar 6.41 9.42 6.31 13.21 8.87 5.68 15.71 4.16 11.55 Millet 0 8.81 9.37 3.95 0 10.24 0 5.08 0 Maize Kharif 18.98 10.85 3.33 12.75 9.19 7.64 9.31 7.44 10.45 Jayad 0 16.29 0 0 0 12.91 13.31 0 0 Total Maize 18.98 10.85 3.33 12.75 9.19 7.64 9.31 7.44 10.45 Marhuva 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sanva Kharif 6.7 6.18 6.8 7.37 3.84 5.53 6.46 6.21 6.32 Jayad 0 0 0 10.3 6.51 0 0 0 0 Total Sanva 6.68 6.17 6.8 7.38 3.88 5.53 6.46 6.21 6.32 Koda 7.66 7.78 3.99 8.71 4.13 7.54 6.31 6.06 6.08 Cocoon 0 0 0 3.05 0 0 0 0 0 Kutki 4.28 2.02 3.94 2.6 0 0 0 0 0 Urad Kharif 3.78 4.71 1.5 1.45 4.4 5.11 8.07 5.83 6.5 Jayad 4.6 4.91 5.31 4.9 5.45 5.87 5.23 5.66 6.13 Total Urad 3.78 4.71 1.5 1.45 4.4 5.11 8.06 5.83 6.5 Moong Kharif 3.28 3.6 0.79 2.66 4.19 3.44 6.45 5.32 5.26 Jayad 5.71 5.04 5.79 6.05 6.62 6.94 5.66 5.63 7.33 Total Moong 3.45 3.71 0.99 2.91 4.26 3.76 6.41 5.32 5.39   86 Masur 5.29 7 7.05 11.62 9.32 11.51 8.99 8.54 8.59 Gram 7.97 8.65 8.67 10.47 11.81 10.97 10.09 8.91 9.64 Pea 9.04 8.43 7.82 12.33 13.41 12.39 11.08 10.41 10.49 Arhar 11.26 6.84 13 11.48 15.45 7.5 9.33 8.52 8.16 Moth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Pulses 6.16 6.92 5.23 6.81 8.8 9.93 9.57 7.57 8.32 Total food (Pulses+ Rice) 10.41 10.82 8.02 11.14 11.67 11.68 12.33 9.22 12.4 Lahi / Sarson 5.27 8.34 5.78 7.9 4.09 6.32 5.46 4.57 8.77 Alsi 2.18 4.55 5.8 5.06 5.13 4.16 3.31 2.67 5.69 Til 2.1 1.3 0.42 1.66 1.53 1.29 1.6 1.48 1.72 Rendi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Groundnut 8.05 6.13 1.68 9.78 7.38 8.66 7.32 5.64 8.48 Sunflower 11.08 19.3 14.36 16.7 19.65 0 16.26 15.36 19.53 Soyabean 6.15 7.35 1.62 10.73 4.13 7.95 9.51 6.91 8.39 Total Oilseeds 5.86 5.8 1.56 7.78 4.61 6.2 5.66 4.3 6.47 Other crops Sugarcane 417.19 466.18 451.52 495.76 602.91 225.12 404.39 190.52 230.47 Potato 213.11 246.62 23.99 209.15 142.88 224.62 220.4 222.19 205.46 Tobacco 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jute 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cotton 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sanai 4.28 4.2 0 3.01 2.77 4.56 2.98 0 0 Turmeric 0 17.9 18.17 18.09 17.38 36.77 38.39 31.06 31.64 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab20.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0304 http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab20.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0607 http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab20.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0910       Table 18: Blockwise Operational Landholdings Agriculture Census 1995-96 & 2000-01 Less than 1.00 1.00 to 2.00 2.00 to 4.00 4.00 to10 Above 10 Total Number Year District Year 1995- Year 1995- Year 2000- Year 1995- Year Year Year 2000-01 Year 1995-96 Year 2000-01 Year 1995-96 Year 2000-01 2000- 96 96 01 96 2000-01 1995-96 01 Bar 37.81  39.75  34.92  37.41  18.10  16.47  7.83  5.54  1.33  0.82  23425 32282 Birdha 37.75  44.63  34.92  30.66  18.10  14.34  7.86  8.94  1.37  1.44  34357 29685 Mahrauni 37.74  45.69  34.86  27.11  18.16  18.31  7.85  7.67  1.38  1.21  26548 26543 Mandawara 37.70  40.75  35.02  32.09  18.01  18.59  7.90  7.44  1.37  1.12  23427 24268 11277 Total 37.75  42.65  34.93  32.06  18.09  16.80  7.86  7.34  1.36  1.14  107757 8 17755 Total District 37.75  41.73  34.93  33.78  18.09  16.68  7.86  6.75  1.37  1.05  156169 6 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab24.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0001       http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab24.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0910                   87       Table 19: Blockwise Irrigation Intensity in the district (in hectares) Blockwise 2000-01 Block Name Gross irrigated area Net irrigated area Irrigation Intensity Bar 27714 27535 100.7 Birdha 34811 34679 100.4 Mahrauni 34616 34593 100.1 Mandawara 23872 23771 100.4 Total 121013 120578 100.4 Total District 177677 176254 100.8 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab17.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0102 Blockwise 2001-02 Block Name Gross irrigated area Net irrigated area Irrigation Intensity Bar 28890 28725 100.6 Birdha 38847 38012 102.2 Mahrauni 35340 35322 100.1 Mandawara 24563 24530 100.1 Total 127640 126589 100.8 Total District 189699 187789 101.0 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab17.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0203 Blockwise 2002-03 Block Name Gross irrigated area Net irrigated area Irrigation Intensity Bar 25998 25862 100.5 Birdha 37815 37238 101.5 Mahrauni 30451 30411 100.1 Mandawara 23697 23664 100.1 Total 117961 117175 100.7 Total District 172613 171355 100.7 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab17.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0304 Blockwise 2003-04 Block Name Gross irrigated area Net irrigated area Irrigation Intensity Bar 33121 32903 100.7 Birdha 46840 46669 100.4 Mahrauni 40728 40623 100.3 Mandawara 26789 26693 100.4 Total 147478 146888 100.4 Total District 210013 208639 100.7 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab17.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0405 Blockwise 2004-05 Block Name Gross irrigated area Net irrigated area Irrigation Intensity Bar 36883 36354 101.5 Birdha 50057 49724 100.7 Mahrauni 42347 42337 100.0 Mandawara 29451 29358 100.3 Total 158738 157773 100.6 Total District 226251 224852 100.6 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab17.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0506 Blockwise 2005-06   88 Block Name Gross irrigated area Net irrigated area Irrigation Intensity Bar 40030 39660 100.9 Birdha 52632 52632 100.0 Mahrauni 44616 44616 100.0 Mandawara 31285 30607 102.2 Total 168563 167515 100.6 Total District 242399 240778 100.7 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab17.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0607 Blockwise 2006-07 Block Name Gross irrigated area Net irrigated area Irrigation Intensity Bar 36138 36021 100.3 Birdha 56456 56082 100.7 Mahrauni 45501 45475 100.1 Mandawara 32110 32011 100.3 Total 170205 169589 100.4 Total District 244822 243446 100.6 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab17.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0708 Blockwise 2007-08 Block Name Gross irrigated area Net irrigated area Irrigation Intensity Bar 7128 7065 100.9 Birdha 44973 44907 100.1 Mahrauni 35858 35854 100.0 Mandawara 27559 27555 100.0 Total 115518 115381 100.1 Total District 163215 162317 100.6 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab17.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0809 Blockwise 2008-09 Block Name Gross irrigated area Net irrigated area Irrigation Intensity Bar 39512 39413 100.3 Birdha 55879 55576 100.5 Mahrauni 45818 45818 100.0 Mandawara 33906 33717 100.6 Total 175115 174524 100.3 Total District 251096 249224 100.8 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab17.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0910   Table 20: Blockwise total area (hect.) irrigated by different sources in the district   Blockwise 2000-01             Tubewell Block Name Canals Wells Ponds Others Total Public Private Bar 35.86 0.00 1.21 42.36 3.56 17.01 34699 Birdha 34.38 0.00 2.73 27.62 0.86 34.40 35112 Mahrauni 57.55 2.55 4.92 19.37 2.17 13.43 31555 Mandawara 29.55 0.00 2.74 23.99 3.63 40.08 21815 Total 39.88 0.65 2.87 29.02 2.45 25.14 123181 Total District 31.81 0.44 2.94 37.94 3.17 23.70 184773 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab18.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0001  Blockwise 2001-02             Tubewell Block Name Canals Wells Ponds Others Total Public Private   89 Bar 24.96 0.00 0.80 51.24 2.72 20.28 27535 Birdha 26.25 0.00 15.25 23.13 2.40 32.98 34679 Mahrauni 52.78 2.22 4.41 13.67 1.29 25.64 34593 Mandawara 24.74 0.56 2.67 20.72 5.24 46.07 23771 Total 33.27 0.75 6.36 26.36 2.71 30.55 120578 Total District 26.66 0.51 5.16 38.26 3.03 26.38 176254 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab18.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0102  Blockwise 2002-03             Tubewell Block Name Canals Wells Ponds Others Total Public Private Bar 25.00 0.00 0.56 49.44 3.56 21.43 28725 Birdha 33.09 0.00 17.22 21.65 3.10 24.93 38012 Mahrauni 45.87 0.00 9.95 15.98 0.64 27.56 35322 Mandawara 24.42 0.00 2.11 28.12 3.60 41.75 24530 Total 33.14 0.00 8.48 27.63 2.62 28.13 126589 Total District 29.77 0.00 6.68 36.45 2.98 24.13 187789 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab18.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0203  Blockwise 2003-04             Tubewell Block Name Canals Wells Ponds Others Total Public Private Bar 28.09 0.00 0.61 48.24 22.39 0.67 25862 Birdha 46.36 0.00 12.63 23.08 11.24 6.69 37238 Mahrauni 21.07 45.87 6.63 6.15 13.56 6.72 30411 Mandawara 15.79 0.00 1.73 51.42 19.84 11.22 23664 Total 29.59 11.90 6.22 29.96 16.04 6.29 117175 Total District 29.20 8.14 4.69 34.33 18.16 5.49 171355 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab18.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0304  Blockwise 2004-05             Tubewell Block Name Canals Wells Ponds Others Total Public Private Bar 29.16 0.00 8.63 39.18 22.25 0.77 36064 Birdha 45.29 0.00 16.90 22.62 14.18 1.01 45306 Mahrauni 38.51 0.00 19.81 14.06 25.35 2.27 25084 Mandawara 22.09 0.00 10.64 43.71 21.91 1.65 31631 Total 34.53 0.00 13.84 30.22 20.09 1.32 138085 Total District 33.33 0.00 10.93 32.96 21.34 1.44 208639 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab18.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0405  Blockwise 2005-06             Tubewell Block Name Canals Wells Ponds Others Total Public Private Bar 21.66 0.00 0.65 52.99 22.45 2.26 36354 Birdha 31.16 0.00 26.36 23.21 11.44 7.84 49724 Mahrauni 49.96 0.00 14.06 20.60 15.39 0.00 42337 Mandawara 23.34 0.00 12.20 22.27 42.20 0.00 29358 Total 32.56 0.00 14.50 29.19 20.76 2.99 157773 Total District 33.32 0.00 11.68 34.77 16.97 3.26 224852 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab18.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0506  Blockwise 2006-07             Tubewell Block Name Canals Wells Ponds Others Total Public Private   90 Bar 22.81 0.00 1.24 52.37 20.56 3.02 39660 Birdha 32.66 0.00 29.79 20.28 5.79 11.47 52632 Mahrauni 49.32 0.10 12.29 18.56 19.73 0.00 44616 Mandawara 20.73 0.00 8.10 25.46 45.72 0.00 30607 Total 32.59 0.03 14.41 28.37 20.29 4.32 167515 Total District 34.09 0.02 12.04 32.37 17.94 3.54 240778 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab18.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0607  Blockwise 2007-08             Tubewell Block Name Canals Wells Ponds Others Total Public Private Bar 19.00 0.00 0.41 57.24 20.82 2.52 36021 Birdha 31.34 0.00 31.74 17.97 12.64 6.32 56082 Mahrauni 45.95 0.01 17.90 22.07 14.07 0.00 45475 Mandawara 20.34 0.12 12.01 23.98 43.54 0.00 32011 Total 30.56 0.03 17.65 28.55 20.59 2.63 169589 Total District 35.34 0.02 15.05 29.48 17.07 3.05 243446 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab18.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0708  Blockwise 2008-09             Tubewell Block Name Canals Wells Ponds Others Total Public Private Bar 4.42 0.00 16.53 53.11 21.32 4.63 7065 Birdha 14.91 0.22 50.47 16.39 14.58 3.43 44907 Mahrauni 7.02 0.25 63.01 18.32 11.19 0.21 35854 Mandawara 7.16 4.70 41.82 19.70 24.94 1.67 27555 Total 9.97 1.29 50.22 20.03 16.41 2.08 115381 Total District 17.01 0.91 39.55 24.90 14.60 3.03 162317 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab18.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0809  Blockwise 2009-10             Tubewell Block Name Canals Wells Ponds Others Total Public Private Bar 13.57 0.50 1.54 61.00 20.12 3.27 39413 Birdha 29.06 0.40 36.06 16.97 10.65 6.86 55576 Mahrauni 34.84 0.00 42.15 10.55 11.05 1.41 45818 Mandawara 18.26 1.27 32.16 22.67 22.90 2.74 33717 Total 24.99 0.49 29.11 26.33 15.26 3.82 174524 Total District 30.99 0.34 22.51 28.61 14.19 3.36 249224 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab18.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0910    Table 21: Blockwise status of sources of irrigation in district / block (Position on 31st march) Blockwise 2000-01 Canal Govt. Ground Boring Private Hose Permanent Rahat Bandhi Block Name Length Tubewell pumpset pumpset tubewell const. Gul const. (km) wells (No.) (No.) (Hect) (Km) (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) Bar 234 0 3284 5050 1149 882 12 0 0 0 Birdha 61 0 2368 636 2150 925 113 0 0 0 Mahrauni 133 1 2464 360 1434 1126 62 0 0 0 Mandawara 69 0 3086 320 1047 1099 39 0 0 0 Total 497 1 11202 6366 5780 4032 226 0 0 0 Total District 649 1 19617 17446 10382 6934 359 0 0 0 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab23.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0001   91 Blockwise 2001-02 Canal Govt. Ground Boring Private Hose Permanent Rahat Bandhi Block Name Length Tubewell pumpset pumpset tubewell const. Gul const. (km) wells (No.) (No.) (Hect) (Km) (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) Bar 234 0 4258 5050 117 882 12 0 0 0 Birdha 61 0 3333 636 114 925 113 0 0 0 Mahrauni 133 1 3434 360 112 1142 62 0 0 0 Mandawara 69 0 4076 320 97 1105 39 0 0 0 Total 497 1 15101 6366 440 4054 226 0 0 0 Total District 649 1 25469 17446 674 6973 359 0 0 0 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab23.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0102 Blockwise 2002-03 Canal Govt. Ground Boring Private Hose Permanent Rahat Bandhi Block Name Length Tubewell pumpset pumpset tubewell const. Gul const. (km) wells (No.) (No.) (Hect) (Km) (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) Bar 234 0 4276 5050 160 885 12 0 0 0 Birdha 61 0 3351 636 168 930 113 0 0 0 Mahrauni 133 1 3452 360 152 1145 62 0 0 0 Mandawara 69 0 4097 320 155 1107 39 0 0 0 Total 497 1 15176 6366 635 4067 226 0 0 0 Total District 649 1 25580 17446 963 7001 359 0 0 0 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab23.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0203 Blockwise 2003-04 Canal Govt. Pumpsets Ground Permanent Rahat Block Name Length Tubewell Electricity Diesel Run Other Total pumpset wells (No.) (No.) (Km) (No.) Run (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) Bar 234 0 4276 275 0 172 19 191 12 Birdha 61 0 3351 260 1 165 17 183 94 Mahrauni 133 1 3452 279 0 143 10 153 79 Mandawara 69 0 4097 242 0 120 14 134 69 Total 497 1 15176 1056 1 600 60 661 254 Total District 649 1 25580 1651 3 943 94 1040 358 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab232004.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0304 Blockwise 2004-05 Canal Govt. Pumpsets Ground Permanent Rahat Block Name Length Tubewell Electricity Diesel Run Other Total pumpset wells (No.) (No.) (Km) (No.) Run (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) Bar 234 0 4291 454 0 162 19 181 12 Birdha 61 0 3368 430 1 180 17 198 94 Mahrauni 133 1 3470 475 0 185 10 195 79 Mandawara 69 0 4114 436 0 109 14 123 69 Total 497 1 15243 1795 1 636 60 697 254 Total District 649 1 25681 2706 3 971 94 1068 469 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab232004.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0405 Blockwise 2005-06 Canal Govt. Pumpsets Ground Permanent Rahat Block Name Length Tubewell Electricity Diesel Run Other Total pumpset wells (No.) (No.) (Km) (No.) Run (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) Bar 234 0 4298 510 0 168 19 187 26 Birdha 61 0 3374 486 1 186 17 204 193   92 Mahrauni 133 1 3476 531 0 191 10 201 170 Mandawara 69 0 4122 494 0 112 14 126 148 Total 497 1 15270 2021 1 657 60 718 537 Total District 649 1 25722 3044 3 1004 94 1101 745 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab232004.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0506 Blockwise 2006-07 Canal Govt. Pumpsets Ground Permanent Rahat Block Name Length Tubewell Electricity Diesel Run Other Total pumpset wells (No.) (No.) (Km) (No.) Run (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) Bar 234 0 4345 638 0 177 19 196 26 Birdha 61 0 3374 565 1 186 17 204 247 Mahrauni 133 1 3490 645 0 192 10 202 234 Mandawara 69 0 4132 579 0 156 14 170 214 Total 497 1 15341 2427 1 711 60 772 721 Total District 649 1 25838 3593 3 1065 94 1162 953 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab232004.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0607 Blockwise 2007-08 Canal Govt. Pumpsets Ground Permanent Rahat Block Name Length Tubewell Electricity Diesel Run Other Total pumpset wells (No.) (No.) (Km) (No.) Run (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) Bar 234 0 4456 706 0 336 19 355 0 Birdha 61 0 3147 723 1 220 17 238 404 Mahrauni 133 1 3286 636 0 405 10 415 287 Mandawara 69 0 2638 601 0 50 14 64 358 Total 497 1 13527 2666 1 1011 60 1072 1049 Total District 649 1 25971 4061 3 1171 94 1268 1288 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab232004.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0708 Blockwise 2008-09 Canal Govt. Pumpsets Ground Permanent Rahat Block Name Length Tubewell Electricity Diesel Run Other Total pumpset wells (No.) (No.) (Km) (No.) Run (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) Bar 234 0 4426 706 0 320 40 360 2 Birdha 61 0 3147 723 3 230 24 257 499 Mahrauni 215 1 3286 636 0 428 10 438 329 Mandawara 69 0 2638 778 0 44 20 64 398 Total 579 1 13497 2843 3 1022 94 1119 1228 Total District 825 1 26003 4438 3 1228 94 1325 1506 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab232004.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0809 Blockwise 2009-10 Canal Govt. Pumpsets Ground Permanent Rahat Block Name Length Tubewell Electricity Diesel Run Other Total pumpset wells (No.) (No.) (Km) (No.) Run (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) Bar 234 0 4476 728 0 320 40 360 2 Birdha 61 0 3197 723 3 230 24 257 534 Mahrauni 215 1 3335 803 0 428 10 438 358 Mandawara 69 0 2688 950 0 84 20 104 433 Total 579 1 13696 3204 3 1062 94 1159 1327 Total District 825 1 26202 4799 3 1268 94 1365 1605 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab232004.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0910     93 Table 22: Blockwise number of cattle according to animal census 1997 and Average per familiy Bovine (Desi) Bovine (cross breed) Mahish Jaatiya More than More than Calf Block Name More than 3 More than 3 Calf (Males Total Bovine More than 3 More than 3 Calf (Males & Total 2,5 yrs 2,5 yrs (Males & Total Total yrs (Male) yrs (Females) & Females) yrs (Male) yrs (Females) Females) (Male) (Female) Females) Bar 20417 12632 33485 66534 0 0 0 0 66534 292 10498 13615 24405 Birdha 16696 22129 18135 56960 3 14 9 26 56986 336 10450 8400 19186 Mahrauni 19127 18805 17082 55014 0 9 6 15 55029 400 9819 7889 18108 Mandawara 20876 19264 19429 59569 0 0 0 0 59569 462 8067 8042 16571 Toatal 77116 72830 88131 238077 3 23 15 41 238118 1490 38834 37946 78270 Toatal District 126155 124626 149719 400500 4 72 71 147 400647 2806 68520 66655 137981 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab29.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0001     Sheep Total goat Pig Total cock, Total (horse & Avg. Animal Other Total (Male & Total animals hen & Pure Cross breed Total pony) Pure Cross breed Total per family poultry poultry Female) chicks 5192 816 6008 25880 11 84 0 84 122924 7 6481 0 6481 2284 0 2284 22782 32 786 0 786 102060 5 8910 4 8914 5092 0 5092 19448 2 282 0 282 97961 6 9177 12 9189 4202 0 4202 18489 33 861 0 861 99725 6 8123 0 8123 16770 816 17586 86599 78 2013 0 2013 422670 6 32691 16 32707 29674 816 30490 148244 271 3886 177 4063 721797 5 61732 35 61767     Table 22: Blockwise number of cattle according to animal census 2003 and Average per familiy Bovine (Desi) Bovine (cross breed) Mahish Jaatiya Block Name More than 3 More than 3 Calf (Males More than More than 2,5 Calf (Males Total Bovine More than 3 More than 3 Calf (Males & Total Total Total yrs (Male) yrs (Females) & Females) 2,5 yrs (Male) yrs (Female) & Females) yrs (Male) yrs (Females) Females) Bar 24193 24315 29269 77777 43 96 90 229 78006 276 13206 14472 27954 Birdha 17446 27979 33100 78525 33 97 84 214 78739 321 13308 9301 22930 Mahrauni 16535 20615 29710 66860 46 132 122 300 67160 378 12987 8643 22008 Mandawara 17198 19095 25733 62026 36 78 67 181 62207 446 10684 10689 21819 Toatal 75372 92004 117812 285188 158 403 363 924 286112 1421 50185 43105 94711 Toatal District 132830 147718 183048 463596 247 646 558 1451 465047 2704 86228 74814 163746 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab29.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0910     Sheep Total goat Pig Total cock, Total (horse & Avg. Animal Other Total (Male & Total animals hen & Pure Cross breed Total pony) Pure Cross breed Total per family poultry poultry Female) chicks 2004 57 2061 26805 8 52 0 52 134886 6 7033 0 7033 1108 0 1108 23716 18 754 0 754 127265 5 9462 24 9486 2103 0 2103 20428 1 250 0 250 111950 5 9719 32 9751 1213 0 1213 20051 21 828 0 828 106139 5 8675 0 8675 6428 57 6485 91000 48 1884 0 1884 480240 5 34889 56 34945 12159 57 12216 153714 160 3662 366 4028 798979 5 65111 98 65209         94   Blockwise 2009-10 Departmental reservoir Distribution of Revenue from Private reservoir Block Name Production Angulikao (in distributed Production No. Area (Hectare) No. Area (Hectare) (quintal) thousands) Angulikao (Rs.) (quintal) Bar 0 - - 1080 - 0 - - Birdha 0 - - 308 - 0 - - Mahrauni 0 - - 2045 - 0 - - Mandawara 0 - - 485 - 0 - - Total 0 0 0 3918 0 0 0 0 Total District 1 126.47 80 8103 - 0 - - Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/tab31.asp?formd=40+Lalitpur++++++++++++++++++++++&formy=0910             95 Annexure 4.2- Secondary Data Haidergarh Branch 96 Table 1: Blockwise Total Population & Population of SC & ST, 1991 Total Population Population of SC Population of ST District Block Name Female Female Female Name Total Male Male (%) Female Total Total (%) Males Male (%) Females Total Total (%) Males Male (%) Females (%) (%) (%) Shukul Bazar 104413 54837 52.52 49576 47.48 28637 27.43 15000 52.38 13637 47.62 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Amethi Jagdishpur 130916 68791 52.55 62125 47.45 33847 25.85 17724 52.37 16123 47.63 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Singhpur 126575 65353 51.63 61222 48.37 40800 32.23 21117 51.76 19683 48.24 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Trivediganj 124938 66599 53.31 58339 46.69 45625 36.52 24680 54.09 20945 45.91 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Barabanki Haidargarh 129653 68928 53.16 60725 46.84 46174 35.61 24722 53.54 21452 46.46 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Raebareli Shivgarh 80492 42325 52.58 38167 47.42 31716 39.40 16648 52.49 15068 47.51 23 0.03 11 47.83 12 52.17 Total Project Area 696987 366833 52.63 330154 47.37 226799 32.54 119891 52.86 106908 47.14 23 0.00 11 47.83 12 52.17 Table 1: District wise Total Population & Population of SC & ST, 2001 Total Population Population of SC Population of ST District Block Name Female Female Female Name Total Male Male (%) Female Total Total (%) Males Male (%) Females Total Total (%) Males Male (%) Females (%) (%) (%) Shukul Bazar 130778 66630 50.95 64148 49.05 35605 27.23 18158 51.00 17447 49.00 40 0.03 22 55.00 18 45.00 Amethi Jagdishpur 192491 98249 51.04 94242 48.96 46714 24.27 23649 50.63 23065 49.37 6 0.00 2 33.33 4 66.67 Singhpur 156546 80219 51.24 76327 48.76 47423 30.29 24313 51.27 23110 48.73 11 0.01 7 0.00 4 0.00 Trivediganj 148370 77985 52.56 70385 47.44 55191 37.20 28950 52.45 26241 47.55 14 0.01 8 57.14 6 42.86 Barabanki Haidargarh 146603 76007 51.85 70596 48.15 51200 34.92 26340 51.45 24860 48.55 7 0.00 6 85.71 1 14.29 Raebareli Shivgarh 98294 51112 52.00 47182 48.00 38193 38.86 19913 52.14 18280 47.86 4 0.00 2 50.00 2 50.00 Total/Avg. Project Area 873082 450202 51.56 422880 48.44 274326 31.42 141323 51.52 133003 48.48 82 0.01 47 57.32 35 42.68 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh, Census 1991 & 2001 http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/select_distt_yr.asp Table 2: Blockwise Decadal Growth 1991 2001 District Name Block Name Rural population % Rural population % Total Male Female Decadal Total Male Female Decadal Shukul Bazar 104413 54837 49576 22.9 130778 66630 64148 25.3 Amethi Jagdishpur 130916 68791 62125 24.3 192491 98249 94242 47.0 Singhpur 126575 65353 61222 24.6 156546 80219 76327 23.7 Trivediganj 124938 66599 58339 19.2 148370 77985 70385 18.7 Barabanki Haidargarh 129653 68928 60725 16.0 146603 76007 70596 21.2 Raebareli Shivgarh 80492 42325 38167 17.9 98294 51112 47182 22.1 Total/Avg. Project Area 696987 366833 330154 20.8 873082 450202 422880 26.3 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh 1991 & 2001 (Table- 6) 97 Table 3: Population Density per Sq. Km. 1991 2001 District Block Name Area (In Total Population Area (In Total Population Name Sq.Km) Population Density Sq.Km) Population Density Shukul Bazar 191.83 104413 544 191.76 130778 682 Amethi Jagdishpur 199.36 130916 657 214.76 192491 896 Singhpur 243.53 126575 520 212.61 156546 736 Trivediganj 229.22 124938 545 229.20 148370 647 Barabanki Haidargarh 257.22 129653 504 247.54 146603 592 Raebareli Shivgarh 198.79 80492 405 185.17 98294 531 Total/Avg. Project Area 1319.95 696987 528 1281.04 873082 682 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh, Census 1991 & 2001 Table 4: Sex Ratio: Number of families per 1000 males Year 1991 Year 2001 District Block Name Name Male Female Sex Ratio Male Female Sex Ratio Shukul Bazar 54837 49576 904 66630 64148 963 Amethi Jagdishpur 68791 62125 903 98249 94242 959 Singhpur 65353 61222 937 80219 76327 951 Trivediganj 66599 58339 876 77985 70385 903 Barabanki Haidargarh 68928 60725 881 76007 70596 929 Raebareli Shivgarh 42325 38167 902 51112 47182 923 Total/Avg. Project Area 366833 330154 900 450202 422880 939 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh, Census 1991 & 2001 98 Table 5: Blockwise Sex wise Literacy percentage and Gender Gap in Literacy Year 1991 District Block Name Literate people Literacy percentage Gender Gap in Name Male Female Total Male Female Total Literacy Year 1991 Shukul Bazar 16084 4301 20385 36.59 10.86 24.39 25.73 Amethi Jagdishpur 25254 6766 32020 45.70 13.71 30.61 31.99 Singhpur 24261 6481 30742 45.82 13.10 30.02 32.72 Trivediganj 28088 7717 35805 51.28 16.44 35.20 34.84 Barabanki Haidargarh 22809 5041 27850 39.93 10.23 26.17 29.70 Raebareli Shivgarh 17769 5640 23409 51.09 18.22 35.61 32.87 Total Project Area 134265 35946 170211 45.07 13.76 30.33 31.31 Year 2001 Shukul Bazar 28069 13193 41262 52.44 25.69 39.34 26.75 CSM Nagar Jagdishpur 48673 24975 73648 62.09 33.16 47.92 28.93 Singhpur 37886 17121 55007 58.39 27.76 43.46 30.63 Trivediganj 41028 20939 61967 64.46 36.80 51.40 27.66 Barabanki Haidargarh 33651 16533 50184 54.56 28.95 42.25 25.61 Raebareli Shivgarh 28239 14683 42922 67.75 38.35 53.68 29.40 Total/Avg. Project Area 217546 107444 324990 59.95 31.79 46.34 28.16 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh, Census 1991 & 2001 (Table 15) Table 6: Blockwise Number of schools per lacs population Number of primary schools per Number of senior primary Number of higher secondary District Block Name lacs population schools per lacs population schools per lacs population Name 2000-01 2005-06 2008-09 2000-01 2005-06 2008-09 2000-01 2005-06 2008-09 Shukul Bazar 78.5 65.8 68.8 16.3 13.0 28.3 2.9 2.3 3.1 Amethi Jagdishpur 70.3 49.4 50.9 15.3 12.5 22.9 5.3 4.2 4.2 Singhpur 70.3 71.5 76.7 12.6 11.5 19.8 3.2 7.0 6.4 Trivediganj 80.0 78.9 82.2 16.0 25.6 29.7 4.0 6.1 6.1 Barabanki Haidargarh 77.9 82.2 90.0 13.9 19.1 25.2 2.3 4.5 6.1 Raebareli Shivgarh 94.4 97.7 110.9 18.6 26.5 38.7 3.7 4.1 4.1 Total/Avg. Project Area 78.6 74.3 79.9 15.5 18.0 27.4 3.6 4.7 5.0 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh 2001 (Table- 3) & Stastical Abstract 2010 99 Table 7: Blockwise situation of safe Source of water supply in the villages Villages under water supply by Tap/ No. of villages using general sources Hand pump India mark 2 District Block Name General Hand pu Name Fully Partially Benefited Well Hand pu mp India Tap Other Total Covered Covered Population mp mark 2 Blockwise 2000-01 Shukul Bazar 70 0 104413 0 0 70 0 0 70 Amethi Jagdishpur 91 0 130916 0 0 91 0 0 91 Singhpur 74 0 139311 0 0 74 0 0 74 Trivediganj 102 0 124938 0 0 102 0 0 102 Barabanki Haidargarh 100 0 129653 0 0 100 0 0 100 Raebareli Shivgarh 62 0 80492 0 0 62 0 0 62 Total/Avg. Project Area 499 0 709723 0 0 499 0 0 499 Blockwise 2005-06 Shukul Bazar 70 0 130778 0 0 70 0 0 70 Amethi Jagdishpur 91 0 192491 0 0 91 0 0 91 Singhpur 74 0 156546 0 0 74 0 0 74 Trivediganj 102 0 148370 0 0 102 0 0 102 Barabanki Haidargarh 101 0 157010 0 0 101 0 0 101 Raebareli Shivgarh 62 0 98294 0 0 62 0 0 62 Total/Avg. Project Area 500 0 883489 0 0 500 0 0 500 Blockwise 2009-10 Shukul Bazar 70 0 130778 0 0 70 0 0 70 Amethi Jagdishpur 91 0 192491 0 0 91 0 0 91 Singhpur 74 0 181739 0 0 74 0 0 74 Trivediganj 102 0 148370 0 0 102 0 0 102 Barabanki Haidargarh 100 0 146603 0 0 100 0 0 100 Raebareli Shivgarh 62 0 114231 0 0 62 0 0 62 Total/Avg. Project Area 499 0 914212 0 0 499 0 0 499 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh 2001 & 2010 (Table 54) 100 Table 8: Length of total Mettled roads per thousands sq. Km. (Km.) District Name Block Name 2000-01 2005-06 2008-09 Shukul Bazar 432.7 537.1 750.9 Amethi Jagdishpur 632.0 833.5 1084.9 Singhpur 616.0 856.0 1077.1 Trivediganj 418.8 549.7 776.6 Barabanki Haidargarh 602.6 820.1 1151.3 Raebareli Shivgarh 533.2 750.7 966.7 Total/Avg. Project Area 539.2 724.5 967.9 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh Year 2000-01, 2005-06 & 2008-09 Table 9: Blockwise percentage of Electrified to total Villages Percentage of electrified villages to total District Name Block Name villages in population 2000-01 2005-06 2008-09 Shukul Bazar 100.0 100 100.0 Amethi Jagdishpur 100.0 97.8 100.0 Singhpur 98.6 95.9 100.0 Trivediganj 52.0 91.2 100.0 Barabanki Haidargarh 66.0 96.0 100.0 Raebareli Shivgarh 100 96.8 100.0 Total/Avg. Project Area 99.3 96.3 100.0 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh 2001 & 2010 (Table 3) 101 Table 10: Number of Branches Nationalized banks and rural banks in the district 2000-01 2005-06 2009-10 No. of other No. of other No. of other Non- District No. of No. of No. of No. of Non- No. of No. of Non- Block Name Commercial Name Nationaliz Rural Nationalized Rural Commercial Nationaliz Rural Commercial Nationalized ed Banks Banks Banks Banks Nationalized ed Banks Banks Nationalized Banks Banks Banks Shukul Bazar 1 3 0 1 3 1 2 3 1 Amethi Jagdishpur 7 4 0 8 4 3 9 4 4 Singhpur 5 4 0 4 3 0 5 3 1 Trivediganj 1 6 1 1 6 1 2 6 1 Barabanki Haidargarh 0 3 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 Raebareli Shivgarh 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 3 1 Total/Avg. Project Area 15 23 1 15 22 5 20 21 8 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh 2001 (Table- 52) Table 11: Blockwise Number of Post office and Telephones 2000-01 2005-06 2009-10 District Block Name Telegraph Post Telegraph Post Telegraph Telephon Name Post Office P.C.O. Telephone P.C.O. Telephone P.C.O. Office Office Office Office Office e Shukul Bazar 15 0 48 263 15 0 75 636 15 0 138 544 Amethi Jagdishpur 23 2 159 1121 23 2 191 1999 23 0 347 1768 Singhpur 29 0 38 284 30 0 18 566 30 0 37 354 Trivediganj 19 0 12 42 21 0 19 463 21 0 80 400 Barabanki Haidargarh 29 1 46 153 28 0 58 672 26 0 70 600 Raebareli Shivgarh 20 0 35 160 20 0 40 720 20 0 14 220 Total/Avg. Project Area 135 3 338 2023 137 2 401 5056 135 0 686 3886 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh 2001 (Table- 51) 102 Table 12: Number of Health facilities per lacs population Number of beds available in Number of Allopathic hospitals and Allopathic hospitals and primary health District Name Block Name primary health centres per lacs population centres per lacs population 2000-01 2005-06 2008-09 2000-01 2005-06 2008-09 Shukul Bazar 2.9 2.3 3.1 11.5 9.2 9.2 Amethi Jagdishpur 5.3 3.6 5.2 38.2 26.0 26.0 Singhpur 4.0 3.2 3.2 14.2 11.5 11.5 Trivediganj 1.6 1.3 1.3 6.4 5.4 5.4 Barabanki Haidargarh 5.4 4.5 4.8 38.6 34.4 36.8 Raebareli Shivgarh 5.0 5.1 5.1 22.4 18.3 38.7 Total/Avg. Project Area 4.0 3.3 3.8 21.9 17.5 21.3 Source: Planni http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/select_distt_yr.asp Table 13: Blockwise Total Workers in Different Activities                       Animal                   Agricultura husbandry/fo Mining and Househol   Construct Trade and Transport, Other Main Marginal   District Name Block Name Farmers Non hous storage and workers Total work l labourers restry / tree quarrying d ion work commerce workers workers ehold communication ers plantation Year 1991   Shukul Bazar 23309 8669 53.0 4 435 429 27 629 114 830 34499 3136 37635 Amethi Jagdishpur 23708 10982 101.0 2 479 1330 75 1484 374 2025 40560 1490 42050 Singhpur 26839 10878 212.0 8 674 537 88 1187 151 2581 43155 3066 46221   Trivediganj 30754 6975 247.0 1 350 476 62 892 175 2140 42072 2744 44816 Barabanki Haidargarh 34097 12550 54.0 1 336 268 55 533 78 1489 49461 2105 51566 Raebareli Shivgarh 17519 4619 98.0 4 159 218 48 661 131 1824 25281 3564 28845 Total/Avg. Project Area 156226 54673 765 20 2433 3258 355 5386 1023 10889 235028 16105 251133 Year 2001   Shukul Bazar 15215 5553 0.0 0 915 0 0 0 0 4392 26075 19170 45245 Amethi Jagdishpur 16668 7546 0.0 0 1930 0 0 0 0 12476 38620 20159 58779 Singhpur 21275 8609 0.0 0 1415 0 0 0 0 5511 36810 23253 60063   Trivediganj 25925 5771 0.0 0 1323 0 0 0 0 4541 37560 21044 58604 Barabanki Haidargarh 21245 8678 0.0 0 1244 0 0 0 0 4023 35190 23412 58602 Raebareli Shivgarh 17586 4539 0.0 0 1121 0 0 0 0 3003 26249 11148 37397 Total/Avg. Project Area 117914 40696 0 0 7948 0 0 0 0 33946 200504 118186 318690 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh 1991& 2001 (Table-8) 103 Table 14: Blockwise Percent of families below Poverty Line Year 1998 Year 2002 District No. of families No. of BPL No. of families No. of BPL Block Name Name below poverty families Families below poverty families Families line (1997-98) Number (%) line (2002) Number (%) Shukul Bazar 13808 19695 70.1 13808 22387 61.7 Amethi Jagdishpur 18864 23112 81.6 18864 31941 59.1 Singhpur 20973 23817 88.1 21138 27247 77.6 Trivediganj 10325 23430 44.1 17255 26181 65.9 Barabanki Haidargarh 11401 25083 45.5 18311 26694 68.6 Raebareli Shivgarh 12607 15654 80.5 12379 17822 69.5 Total/Avg. Project Area 87978 130791 67.3 101755 152272 66.8 Source: Department of Rural Development, Government of UP, 1998 & 2002 Table 15: Blockwise land usage in the district (in hectares) Gross area sown Land put to Present Other Barren & Pastures Area under Area sown Land Net Gross Barren C use other Net area District Name Bock Name Total Area Forest fallow fallow uncult. to non- bush, forest more than prepared for irrigated irrigated ult. Waste than sown Total Rabi Kharif Jayad land land Land agri. Use & garden once sugarcane area area agriculture Blockwise 2000-01 Shukul Bazar 19357 893 805 1280 1020 611 1558 171 526 12493 6456 18949 8501 8337 1699 0 7712 11391 Amethi Jagdishpur 21569 63 700 2598 357 635 2376 251 823 13766 7581 21347 8479 9914 2443 0 7040 9498 Singhpur 24105 300 1327 73 1110 579 2433 300 1034 16949 3798 20747 11167 9093 487 0 15419 18229 Trivediganj 22889 339 661 1358 1453 352 2295 159 820 15452 10130 25582 11754 11368 2460 0 14312 25979 Barabanki Haidargarh 25831 965 462 1783 1696 746 2850 357 503 16469 12514 28983 11311 15497 2175 0 17063 23767 Raebareli Shivgarh 19527 98 783 265 2281 1124 2275 232 628 11841 6073 17914 7955 9184 775 0 11365 17059 Total/Avg. Project Area 133278 2658 4738 7357 7917 4047 13787 1470 4334 86970 46552 133522 59167 63393 10039 0 72911 105923 Blockwise 2005-06 Shukul Bazar 19148 853 660 1424 1013 577 1727 94 486 12314 5278 17592 8630 7375 1586 1 8279 13527 Amethi Jagdishpur 21542 60 572 2848 370 600 2632 136 740 13584 6795 20379 8608 9469 2301 1 7553 12308 Singhpur 21399 349 496 1592 1151 489 3125 219 1045 12933 8645 21578 10545 10419 614 0 11113 20312 Trivediganj 23506 339 275 1954 1008 403 2570 118 747 16092 14374 30466 13042 14568 2856 0 14423 25676 Barabanki Haidargarh 25626 965 570 2659 1099 284 3189 266 485 16109 14248 30357 11721 16098 2537 1 14324 25584 Raebareli Shivgarh 19258 114 1372 583 2198 1111 3097 232 640 9911 8097 18008 7801 9590 617 0 9788 17308 Total/Avg. Project Area 130479 2680 3945 11060 6839 3464 16340 1065 4143 80943 57437 138380 60347 67519 10511 3 65480 114715 Blockwise 2008-09 Shukul Bazar 19237 885 602 1221 1016 588 1775 94 488 12568 5137 17705 7765 8384 1566 0 8730 13898 Amethi Jagdishpur 21465 62 521 2464 374 612 2696 137 742 13857 6635 20492 9858 8362 2274 0 7984 12659 Singhpur 24154 350 532 3724 1499 489 3237 217 1338 12768 8319 21087 10470 9945 672 0 13119 20835 Trivediganj 23608 383 316 1734 1194 293 2630 123 721 16214 14393 30607 13523 14310 2774 0 14348 27070 Barabanki Haidargarh 25845 1090 655 2353 1301 206 3263 275 468 16234 14409 30643 12152 15979 2511 1 14366 27102 Raebareli Shivgarh 19490 114 1451 1504 2120 1092 3209 222 366 9412 7613 17025 7688 8647 690 0 10119 17754 Total/Avg. Project Area 133799 2884 4077 13000 7504 3280 16810 1068 4123 81053 56506 137559 61456 65627 10487 1 68666 119318 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh 2001, 2006 & 2010 (Table 17) 104 Table 16: Bloickwise Cropping Intensity 2000-2001 2005-2006 2008-2009 District Cropping Cropping Cropping Block Name Gross area Net area Gross area Net area Gross area Net area Name Intensity Intensity Intensity (in sown sown sown sown sown sown (in Ha) (in Ha) Ha) Shukul Bazar 18949 12493 151.7 17592 12314 142.9 17705 12568 140.9 Amethi Jagdishpur 21347 13766 155.1 20379 13584 150.0 20492 13857 147.9 Singhpur 20747 16949 122.4 21578 12933 166.8 21087 12768 165.2 Trivediganj 25582 15452 165.6 30466 16092 189.3 30607 16214 188.8 Barabanki Haidargarh 28983 16469 176.0 30357 16109 188.4 30643 16234 188.8 Raebareli Shivgarh 17914 11841 151.3 18008 9911 181.7 17025 9412 180.9 Total/Avg. Project Area 133522 86970 153.5 138380 80943 171.0 137559 81053 169.7 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh Year 2000-01, 2005-06 & 2009-10 Table 17: Blockwise area covered by main crops in the district (In hect.) Blockwise 2000-01 District Rice kharif Rice jayad Total rice Wheat Barley Jwar Millet Maize kharif Block Name Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Shukul Bazar 6300 3829 0 0 6300 3829 6590 6562 69 44 590 0 13 0 222 0 Amethi Jagdishpur 7407 6815 0 0 7407 6815 6872 6814 96 67 621 0 12 0 209 0 Singhpur 7761 7511 0 0 7761 7511 9388 9388 254 182 524 0 20 0 0 0 Trivediganj 9906 9664 0 0 9906 9664 9476 9376 10 5 292 0 11 0 50 2 Barabanki Haidargarh 12573 12032 0 0 12573 12032 9903 9800 35 10 438 0 13 0 92 0 Raebareli Shivgarh 8638 8638 0 0 8638 8638 6941 6932 28 12 115 0 2 0 0 0 Total/Avg. Project Area 52585 48489 0 0 52585 48489 49170 48872 492 320 2580 0 71 0 573 2 Blockwise 2005-06 District Rice kharif Rice jayad Total rice Wheat Barley Jwar Millet Maize kharif Block Name Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Shukul Bazar 6094 5978 0 0 6094 5978 6753 6743 51 37 519 0 7 0 229 1 Amethi Jagdishpur 7223 7169 0 0 7223 7169 7059 7038 79 62 549 0 7 0 213 1 Singhpur 9833 9833 0 0 9833 9833 9560 9560 40 15 196 0 0 0 0 0 Trivediganj 10227 9782 0 0 10227 9782 10687 10509 8 4 319 0 28 0 135 4 Barabanki Haidargarh 13238 12567 0 0 13238 12567 11141 10956 20 5 450 1 29 0 176 0 Raebareli Shivgarh 9083 9042 2 2 9085 9044 6910 6910 37 25 26 0 0 0 0 0 Total/Avg. Project Area 55698 54371 2 2 55700 54373 52110 51716 235 148 2059 1 71 0 753 6 Blockwise 2008-09 District Rice kharif Rice jayad Total rice Wheat Barley Jwar Millet Maize kharif Block Name Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Shukul Bazar 6240 6230 0 0 6240 6230 6773 6768 54 43 491 0 4 0 194 2 Amethi Jagdishpur 7437 7426 0 0 7437 7426 7082 7078 79 73 521 0 5 0 181 2 Singhpur 10202 10200 0 0 10202 10200 9723 9722 40 15 134 0 0 0 0 0 Trivediganj 10579 10223 0 0 10579 10223 11535 11800 2 1 243 0 25 0 120 0 Barabanki Haidargarh 13638 13214 0 0 13638 13214 11908 11885 6 2 305 0 28 0 160 0 Raebareli Shivgarh 9424 9423 0 0 9424 9423 7028 7027 36 25 18 0 0 0 0 0 Total/Avg. Project Area 57520 56716 0 0 57520 56716 54049 54280 217 159 1712 0 62 0 655 4 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh 2001, 2006 & 2009 (Table� 19) 105 Table 17: Blockwise area covered by main crops in the district (In hect.) Blockwise 2000-01 District Maize jayad Total Maize Marhuva Sanva kharif Sanva jayad Total sanva Koda Cocoon Kutki Total dhaan Block Name Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Shukul Bazar 0 0 222 0 0 0 54 0 8 8 62 8 149 0 7 0 0 0 14002 10443 Amethi Jagdishpur 2 2 211 2 0 0 21 0 10 10 31 10 8 0 17 0 0 0 15275 13708 Singhpur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 17957 17091 Trivediganj 5 5 55 7 0 0 0 0 6 6 6 6 68 0 0 0 0 0 19824 19058 Barabanki Haidargarh 0 0 92 0 0 0 16 0 10 10 26 10 64 0 1 0 0 0 23145 21852 Raebareli Shivgarh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 15729 15587 Total/Avg. Project Area 7 7 580 9 0 0 91 0 49 49 140 49 289 0 25 0 0 0 105932 97739 Blockwise 2005-06 District Maize jayad Total Maize Marhuva Sanva kharif Sanva jayad Total sanva Koda Cocoon Kutki Total dhaan Block Name Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Shukul Bazar 0 0 3 3 232 4 7 0 3 3 10 3 52 0 13718 12765 171 1 241 241 Amethi Jagdishpur 0 0 7 7 220 8 5 0 5 5 10 5 1 0 15148 14282 113 1 299 299 Singhpur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19629 19408 Trivediganj 5 5 140 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 21449 20304 Barabanki Haidargarh 1 1 177 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 25098 23530 Raebareli Shivgarh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 16059 15980 Total/Avg. Project Area 6 6 327 20 452 12 16 0 9 9 25 9 132 0 28866 27047 284 2 82775 79762 Blockwise 2008-09 District Maize jayad Total Maize Marhuva Sanva kharif Sanva jayad Total sanva Koda Cocoon Kutki Total dhaan Block Name Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Shukul Bazar 3 3 5 5 202 10 5 0 0 0 5 0 47 0 13816 13051 159 1 259 259 Amethi Jagdishpur 2 2 10 10 193 14 4 0 1 1 5 1 2 0 15324 14592 101 2 316 316 Singhpur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20099 19937 Trivediganj 4 4 124 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 22528 22028 Barabanki Haidargarh 0 0 161 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 26066 25102 Raebareli Shivgarh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 16507 16476 Total/Avg. Project Area 9 9 300 20 395 24 9 0 2 2 11 2 89 0 29140 27643 260 3 85775 84118 Source: Planning Commission Ut 106 Table 17: Blockwise area covered by main crops in the district (In hect.) Blockwise 2000-01 District Urad kharif Urad jayad Total urad Moong kharif Moong jayad Total moong Masur Gram Pea Arhar Block Name Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Shukul Bazar 149 0 287 285 436 285 3 0 41 41 44 41 160 65 897 8 307 279 676 0 Amethi Jagdishpur 97 0 342 339 439 339 4 0 30 30 34 30 174 52 1325 13 290 222 261 0 Singhpur 200 0 244 244 444 244 3 0 57 57 60 57 40 5 590 60 424 94 424 0 Trivediganj 313 0 317 311 630 311 0 0 22 19 22 19 60 34 133 1 244 174 303 0 Barabanki Haidargarh 489 0 266 266 755 266 3 0 6 6 9 6 211 21 212 1 446 226 475 0 Raebareli Shivgarh 170 0 284 284 454 284 3 0 23 23 26 23 17 1 43 0 204 15 110 0 Total/Avg. Project Area 1418 0 1740 1729 3158 1729 16 0 179 176 195 176 662 178 3200 83 1915 1010 2249 0 Blockwise 2005-06 District Urad kharif Urad jayad Total urad Moong kharif Moong jayad Total moong Masur Gram Pea Arhar Block Name Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Shukul Bazar 412 242 2 0 33 33 35 33 233 39 606 5 309 238 569 0 2164 557 15882 13322 Amethi Jagdishpur 412 300 3 0 29 29 32 29 249 36 824 12 297 193 178 0 1992 570 17140 14852 Singhpur 96 0 272 272 368 272 10 0 17 17 27 17 148 6 58 9 314 28 91 0 Trivediganj 608 2 117 117 725 119 0 0 14 14 14 14 47 8 40 1 188 145 288 0 Barabanki Haidargarh 928 0 91 91 1019 91 0 0 6 6 6 6 231 5 72 1 352 187 438 0 Raebareli Shivgarh 145 0 217 212 362 212 1 0 19 19 20 19 30 3 38 4 152 21 119 0 Total/Avg. Project Area 2601 544 702 692 2536 756 78 62 538 131 1497 73 1062 453 955 15 5162 1508 33958 28174 Blockwise 2008-09 District Urad kharif Urad jayad Total urad Moong kharif Moong jayad Total moong Masur Gram Pea Arhar Block Name Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Shukul Bazar 418 260 3 0 38 38 41 38 251 37 570 6 304 240 539 0 2123 581 15939 13632 Amethi Jagdishpur 417 318 2 0 37 37 39 37 265 35 788 15 293 193 156 0 1958 598 17282 15190 Singhpur 81 19 283 283 364 302 6 0 31 31 37 31 105 5 55 6 257 34 57 0 Trivediganj 640 0 88 87 728 87 0 0 8 8 8 8 50 5 40 0 188 125 215 0 Barabanki Haidargarh 1027 0 63 63 1090 63 0 0 4 4 4 4 160 5 80 1 368 265 328 0 Raebareli Shivgarh 122 0 226 226 348 226 0 0 22 22 22 22 24 3 36 3 124 26 76 0 Total/Avg. Project Area 2705 597 665 659 2605 753 86 75 581 137 1429 86 936 451 906 10 5018 1629 33897 28822 Source: Planning Commission Ut 107 Table 17: Blockwise area covered by main crops in the district (In hect.) Blockwise 2000-01 District Moth Total pulses Total grains Lahi/Sarson Alsi Til Rendi Groundnut Sunflower Block Name Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Shukul Bazar 0 0 2520 678 16522 11121 148 146 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 17 17 Amethi Jagdishpur 0 0 2523 656 17798 14364 172 171 3 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 45 45 Singhpur 0 0 1982 460 19939 17551 146 142 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Trivediganj 0 0 1392 539 21216 19597 378 274 10 0 38 7 0 0 35 0 0 0 Barabanki Haidargarh 0 0 2108 520 25253 22372 436 344 19 0 17 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 Raebareli Shivgarh 0 0 854 323 16583 15910 243 237 93 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total/Avg. Project Area 0 0 11379 3176 117311 100915 1523 1314 126 0 82 8 0 0 37 0 63 62 Blockwise 2005-06 District Moth Total pulses Total grains Lahi/Sarson Alsi Til Rendi Groundnut Sunflower Block Name Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Shukul Bazar 171 169 1 0 7 0 1 0 4 4 0 0 184 173 23 23 201 201 Amethi Jagdishpur 199 196 1 0 5 0 2 0 8 8 0 0 215 204 39 39 171 171 Singhpur 0 0 1006 332 20635 19740 285 210 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Trivediganj 0 0 1302 287 22751 20591 390 347 7 0 38 1 0 0 81 0 0 0 Barabanki Haidargarh 0 0 2118 290 27216 23820 457 407 9 0 22 1 0 0 38 0 0 0 Raebareli Shivgarh 0 0 721 259 16780 16239 274 226 40 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total/Avg. Project Area 370 365 5149 1168 87394 80390 1409 1190 70 25 63 2 399 377 181 62 373 373 Blockwise 2008-09 District Moth Total pulses Total grains Lahi/Sarson Alsi Til Rendi Groundnut Sunflower Block Name Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Shukul Bazar 174 167 1 0 7 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 186 169 22 22 215 215 Amethi Jagdishpur 204 195 1 0 6 0 2 0 5 5 0 0 218 200 37 37 184 184 Singhpur 0 0 875 378 20974 20315 258 236 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Trivediganj 0 0 1229 225 23757 22253 632 582 2 0 30 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 Barabanki Haidargarh 0 0 2030 338 28096 25440 708 658 2 0 19 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 Raebareli Shivgarh 0 0 630 280 17137 16756 248 248 21 5 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total/Avg. Project Area 378 362 4766 1221 89977 84764 1850 1724 32 12 68 0 404 369 147 59 399 399 Source: Planning Commission Ut 108 Table 17: Blockwise area covered by main crops in the district (In hect.) Blockwise 2000-01 District Soyabean Total oilseeds Sugarcane Potato Onion Other vegetables Tobacco Block Name Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Shukul Bazar 0 0 175 163 7 7 194 194 38 38 460 450 0 0 Amethi Jagdishpur 0 0 226 216 23 23 161 161 25 25 530 430 0 0 Singhpur 0 0 151 142 40 40 96 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 Trivediganj 0 0 461 281 163 138 211 211 0 0 0 0 8 8 Barabanki Haidargarh 0 0 475 345 128 122 248 248 0 0 0 0 4 4 Raebareli Shivgarh 0 0 343 237 41 41 95 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total/Avg. Project Area 0 0 1831 1384 402 371 1005 1005 63 63 990 880 12 12 Blockwise 2005-06 District Soyabean Total oilseeds Sugarcane Potato Onion Other vegetables Tobacco Block Name Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Shukul Bazar 13 13 41 41 54 54 371 371 121 31 79 79 571 481 Amethi Jagdishpur 12 12 33 33 45 45 368 368 122 29 81 81 571 478 Singhpur 0 0 289 211 170 170 75 75 18 18 292 289 0 0 Trivediganj 0 0 516 348 94 83 381 381 30 30 485 468 4 4 Barabanki Haidargarh 0 0 526 408 88 83 325 325 37 37 415 401 2 2 Raebareli Shivgarh 0 0 316 239 66 66 92 92 19 19 215 213 0 0 Total/Avg. Project Area 25 25 1721 1280 517 501 1612 1612 347 164 1567 1531 1148 965 Blockwise 2008-09 District Soyabean Total oilseeds Sugarcane Potato Onion Other vegetables Tobacco Block Name Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Shukul Bazar 11 11 42 42 53 53 392 392 111 25 82 82 585 499 Amethi Jagdishpur 12 12 33 33 45 45 393 393 115 23 90 90 598 506 Singhpur 0 0 267 236 149 149 67 67 8 8 273 270 0 0 Trivediganj 0 0 724 582 83 70 475 475 17 17 527 527 2 2 Barabanki Haidargarh 0 0 757 658 79 68 398 398 17 17 443 443 2 2 Raebareli Shivgarh 0 0 279 253 57 57 83 83 8 8 219 217 0 0 Total/Avg. Project Area 23 23 2102 1804 466 442 1808 1808 276 98 1634 1629 1187 1009 Source: Planning Commission Ut Table 17: Blockwise area covered by main crops in the district (In hect.) Blockwise 2000-01 District Jute Cotton Sanai Turmeric Total Rabi fodder Total Kharif fodder Total Jayad fodder Block Name Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Shukul Bazar 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 130 130 340 2 48 48 Amethi Jagdishpur 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 109 109 409 1 79 79 Singhpur 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 71 71 90 0 14 14 Trivediganj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 281 276 162 6 81 80 Barabanki Haidargarh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 157 241 0 43 43 Raebareli Shivgarh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 124 65 0 43 43 Total/Avg. Project Area 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 874 867 1307 9 308 307 Blockwise 2005-06 District Jute Cotton Sanai Turmeric Total Rabi fodder Total Kharif fodder Total Jayad fodder Block Name Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Shukul Bazar 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 151 151 256 3 55 55 Amethi Jagdishpur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 133 133 291 2 87 87 Singhpur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 152 152 80 0 26 24 Trivediganj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 277 276 149 2 88 88 Barabanki Haidargarh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 143 142 232 5 51 51 Raebareli Shivgarh 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 141 141 50 1 47 47 Total/Avg. Project Area 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 997 995 1058 13 354 352 109 Blockwise 2008-09 District Jute Cotton Sanai Turmeric Total Rabi fodder Total Kharif fodder Total Jayad fodder Block Name Name Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Total Irrigated Shukul Bazar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 161 160 246 4 63 63 Amethi Jagdishpur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 142 141 282 5 97 97 Singhpur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 142 142 81 4 34 34 Trivediganj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 226 225 256 1 82 82 Barabanki Haidargarh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 120 124 1 45 45 Raebareli Shivgarh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 131 131 51 6 61 61 Total/Avg. Project Area 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 922 919 1040 21 382 382 Source: Planning Commission Ut 110 Table 18: Average production of main crops (quintal/hectare) in the district Name of crops 2000-01 2005-06 2008-09 District: Barabanki Rice Kharif 17.78 23.25 20.52 Jayad 17.05 0 0 Total rice 17.78 23.25 20.52 Wheat 28.15 28.99 30.69 Barley 21.43 18.55 23.36 Jwar 7.62 4.82 7.37 Millet 15.53 15.16 16.36 Maize Kharif 14.01 11.56 0.04 Jayad 16.22 12.91 15.32 Total Maize 14.3 11.71 1.52 Marhuva 0 0 0 Sanva Kharif 6.7 5.53 6.32 Jayad 9.16 6.85 0 Total sanva 7.93 5.5 6.32 Koda 7.66 7.54 6.98 Cocoon 3.04 0 0 Kutki 0 0 0 Urad Kharif 4.41 4.97 5.21 Jayad 4.28 4.51 4.45 Total urad 4.35 4.87 5.09 Moong Kharif 3.02 2.87 3.74 Jayad 6.31 4.25 4.57 Total moong 5.71 4.19 4.57 Masur 8.46 6.64 8.29 Gram 11.78 8.99 10.27 Pea 10.11 11.67 12.03 Arhar 10.07 10.04 9.59 Moth 3.06 0 0 Total pulses 8.21 6.98 7.81 Total food (Pulses+ R 28.39 23.18 23.41 Lahi / Sarson 8.78 11.5 6.45 Alsi 3.6 4.24 4.4 Til 1.61 1.93 1.69 Rendi 0 0 0 Groundnut 8.35 8.73 7.35 Sunflower 13.04 14.23 19.53 Soyabean 0 0 0 Total Oilseeds 8.59 11.1 6.44 Other crops Sugarcane 561.92 494.44 507.2 Potato 193.77 190.44 128.81 Tobacco 68.77 58.21 56.09 Jute 0 0 0 Cotton 1.52 Sanai 0 0 0 Turmeric 17.44 0 0 111 Table 18: Average production of main crops (quintal/hectare) in the district Name of crops 2000-01 2005-06 2008-09 District: Raebareli Rice Kharif 15.39 20.83 22.63 Jayad 0 20.83 0 Total rice 15.39 20.83 22.63 Wheat 21.88 20.58 25.47 Barley 14.61 15.1 19.09 Jwar 7.47 8.96 8.59 Millet 7.84 7.43 10.57 Maize Kharif 8.09 13.36 11.82 Jayad 0 12.91 15.32 Total Maize 8.09 13.48 11.89 Marhuva 14.6 0 0 Sanva Kharif 0 5.53 0 Jayad 9.16 6.85 18.17 Total sanva 9.16 7 18.17 Koda 6.72 0 0 Cocoon 0 0 0 Kutki 0 0 0 Urad Kharif 3.91 3.44 3.64 Jayad 4.14 4.97 5.37 Total urad 3.97 3.74 4.04 Moong Kharif 1.77 2.91 3.74 Jayad 5.71 6.94 4.86 Total moong 3.25 4.04 4.23 Masur 10.72 7.21 8.33 Gram 10.12 12.31 11.62 Pea 9.99 11.67 12.03 Arhar 12.36 8.79 7.21 Moth 3.06 0 0 Total pulses 8.18 7.25 6.93 Total food (Pulses+ R 17.1 18.75 22.26 Lahi / Sarson 7.38 6.52 9.02 Alsi 3.6 4.24 4.4 Til 1.31 1.48 2.25 Rendi 0 0 0 Groundnut 6.56 7.59 7.41 Sunflower 13.04 17.84 19.91 Soyabean 0 0 0 Total Oilseeds 6.22 6.15 7.53 Other crops Sugarcane 478.84 471.24 345.24 Potato 135.94 178.72 156.3 Tobacco 63 44.83 60 Jute 0 0 0 Cotton 0 Sanai 4.28 4.56 3.6 Turmeric 17.44 36.77 31.64 Source Stastical Abstract, 2010 112 Table 19: Blocktwise Operational Landholding District Less than 0.50 0.50 to 1.00 1.00 to 2.00 2.00 to 4.00 4.00 to10 10 or more Total Number Block Name Name Number Area Number Area Number Area Number Area Number Area Number Area Number Area Agriculture Census 1995-96 Shukul Bazar 17018 4056 5697 3856 2271 2855 684 1867 131 661 8 89 25809 13384 Amethi Jagdishpur 20094 5158 6289 4093 2297 3027 717 1955 119 643 5 74 29521 14950 Singhpur 13980 2929 6503 3870 3712 4739 1396 3513 305 1597 12 168 25908 16816 Trivediganj 15723 4293 6213 4273 3570 4790 1390 3718 327 1840 9 249 27232 19163 Barabanki Haidargarh 17746 4845 7012 4823 4029 5407 1569 4196 369 2076 10 282 30735 21629 Raebareli Shivgarh 9485 1768 4403 2333 2571 3903 1035 2353 202 1203 10 130 17706 11690 Total/Avg. Project Area 94046 23049 36117 23248 18450 24721 6791 17602 1453 8020 54 992 156911 97632 Agriculture Census 2000-01 Shukul Bazar 16418 5223 5579 3661 2181 2587 628 1748 103 524 4 55 24913 13798 Amethi Jagdishpur 19385 6642 6158 3886 2206 2743 658 1830 94 509 3 46 28504 15656 Singhpur 12402 3424 5798 3929 3187 4278 1334 3622 372 2005 9 119 23102 17377 Trivediganj 15383 4590 5482 4062 3003 4031 1058 2782 232 1244 11 186 25169 16895 Barabanki Haidargarh 17362 5180 6187 4585 3389 4550 1195 3140 262 1403 13 211 28408 19069 Raebareli Shivgarh 8414 2067 3925 2368 2208 3523 989 2426 247 1511 7 92 15790 11987 Total/Avg. Project Area 89364 27126 33129 22491 16174 21712 5862 15548 1310 7196 47 709 145886 94782 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh, Agriculture Census, 1995-96 & 2000-01 (Table 24) Table 20: Blockwise Irrigation Intensity in the district (in hectares) Year 2000-01 Year 2005-06 Year 2008-09 District Gross Net Gross Net Gross Net Block Name Irrigation Irrigation Irrigation Name irrigated irrigated irrigated irrigated irrigated irrigated Intensity Intensity Intensity area area area area area area Shukul Bazar 11391 7712 147.7 13527 8279 163.4 13898 8730 159.2 Amethi Jagdishpur 9498 7040 134.9 12308 7553 163.0 12659 7984 158.6 Singhpur 18229 15419 118.2 20312 11113 182.8 20835 13119 158.8 Trivediganj 25979 14312 181.5 25676 14423 178.0 27070 14348 188.7 Barabanki Haidargarh 23767 17063 139.3 25584 14324 178.6 27102 14366 188.7 Raebareli Shivgarh 17059 11365 150.1 17308 9788 176.8 17754 10119 175.5 Total/Avg. Project Area 105923 72911 145.3 114715 65480 175.2 119318 68666 173.8 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh 2001, 2006 & 2010 (Table 17) 113 Table 21: Irrigation Infrastructure Blockwise 2000-01 Canal Govt. Ground Boring Private Hose District Permanent Rahat Bandhi Gul const. ( Block Name Length Tubewell pumpset pumpset tubewell const. Name wells (No.) (No.) (Hect) km) (Km) (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) Shukul Bazar 1 1 0 0 0 60 850 0 0 0 Amethi Jagdishpur 0 0 0 0 0 61 850 0 0 0 Singhpur 196 11 305 301 16 2933 359 0 0 0 Trivediganj 25 0 108 124 4 1375 90 0 0 0 Barabanki Haidargarh 120 0 87 43 1 3392 106 0 0 0 Raebareli Shivgarh 141 3 28 24 2 2479 137 0 0 0 Total/Avg. Project Area 483 15 528 492 23 10300 2392 0 0 0 Blockwise 2005-06 Pumpsets Canal Govt. Ground District Permanent Rahat Block Name Length Tubewell Electricity Diesel Other Total pumpset Name wells (No.) (No.) (Km) (No.) Run (No.) Run (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) Shukul Bazar 73 13 0 0 98 4238 45 4381 0 Amethi Jagdishpur 115 28 0 0 671 5092 7 5770 1 Singhpur 196 8 1151 0 83 4063 42 4188 0 Trivediganj 138 0 0 0 99 4647 55 4801 0 Barabanki Haidargarh 183 0 0 0 163 3302 19 3484 1 Raebareli Shivgarh 141 3 0 0 29 3759 26 3814 0 Total/Avg. Project Area 846 52 1151 0 1143 25101 194 26438 2 Blockwise 2008-09 Pumpsets Canal Govt. Ground District Permanent Rahat Block Name Length Tubewell Electricity Diesel Other Total pumpset Name wells (No.) (No.) (Km) (No.) Run (No.) Run (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) Shukul Bazar 73 13 0 0 104 4390 45 4539 0 Amethi Jagdishpur 115 29 0 0 690 5275 7 5972 2 Singhpur 187 7 1454 0 83 4206 42 4331 0 Trivediganj 138 0 0 0 146 5765 92 6003 4 Barabanki Haidargarh 183 2 0 0 235 4008 32 4275 7 Raebareli Shivgarh 141 2 0 0 29 4065 26 4120 0 Total/Avg. Project Area 837 53 1454 0 1287 27709 244 29240 13 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh 2001, 2006 & 2010 (Table 23) Table 22: Blockwise total area (hect.) irrigated by different sources in the district District Tubewell Block Name Canals Wells Ponds Others Total Name Public Private Blockwise 2000-01 Shukul Bazar 0 5 2 4 0 0 11 Amethi Jagdishpur 0 4 2 4 0 1 11 Singhpur 11417 89 3880 0 33 0 15419 Trivediganj 13896 0 361 27 0 28 14312 Barabanki Haidargarh 15815 0 1106 71 14 57 17063 Raebareli Shivgarh 8462 9 2845 0 49 0 11365 Total/Avg. Project Area 49590 107 8196 106 96 86 58181 Blockwise 2005-06 Shukul Bazar 3017 129 5117 7 9 0 8279 Amethi Jagdishpur 2818 93 4631 4 7 0 7553 Singhpur 9883 51 1179 0 0 0 11113 Trivediganj 8238 160 6010 13 0 2 14423 Barabanki Haidargarh 9550 0 4733 40 1 0 14324 114 Raebareli Shivgarh 3638412 1007 0 6 0 9788 Total/Avg. Project Area 796 41918 22677 64 23 2 65480 Blockwise 2008-09 Shukul Bazar 3277 133 5310 6 8 0 8734 Amethi Jagdishpur 3056 97 4826 5 0 0 7984 Singhpur 10241 35 2841 0 2 13119 Trivediganj 8785 79 5484 0 0 0 14348 Barabanki Haidargarh 10185 0 4179 1 1 0 14366 Raebareli Shivgarh 9390 0 723 5 1 10119 Total/Avg. Project Area 44934 344 23363 12 14 3 68670 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh 2001, 2006 & 2010 (Table 18) Table 23: Per capita Annual food grain availability (in Kilogram) 2000-01 2005-06 2008-09 Per capita Per capita Per capita Total food grain Production in Total food grain Production in Total food grain Name of crop Production in (in Population availability (in metric Population availability (in metric Population availability metric tonnes) (Census 1991) in tonnes) (Census 2001) in tonnes) (Census 2001) in Kilogram Kilogram Kilogram District: Barabanki Rice 282919 2078512 136.12 443060 2673581 165.72 349523 2673581 130.73 Wheat 373586 2078512 179.74 480955 2673581 179.89 492381 2673581 184.17 Barley 1174 2078512 0.56 477 2673581 0.18 168 2673581 0.06 Jwar 3203 2078512 1.54 1965 2673581 0.73 1811 2673581 0.68 Millet 1276 2078512 0.61 1301 2673581 0.49 1196 2673581 0.45 Maize 8426 2078512 4.05 8398 2673581 3.14 801 2673581 0.30 Marhuva 0 2078512 0.00 2673581 0.00 2673581 0.00 Sanva 46 2078512 0.02 11 2673581 0.00 1 2673581 0.00 Koda 511 2078512 0.25 337 2673581 0.13 112 2673581 0.04 Cocoon 2 2078512 0.00 2673581 0.00 2673581 0.00 Kutki 0 2078512 0.00 2673581 0.00 2673581 0.00 Total Dhaan 671143 2078512 322.90 936504 2673581 350.28 845993 2673581 316.43 Urad 3690 2078512 1.78 4943 2673581 1.85 5068 2673581 1.90 Moong 48 2078512 0.02 31 2673581 0.01 21 2673581 0.01 Masoor 17672 2078512 8.50 20224 2673581 7.56 13552 2673581 5.07 Gram 3295 2078512 1.59 865 2673581 0.32 801 2673581 0.30 Pea 3935 2078512 1.89 3741 2673581 1.40 3352 2673581 1.25 Arhar 5771 2078512 2.78 4972 2673581 1.86 2975 2673581 1.11 Moth 1 2078512 0.00 2673581 0.00 2673581 0.00 Total Pulses 34412 2078512 16.56 34776 2673581 13.01 25769 2673581 9.64 Total Food (Pulse 705555 2078512 339.45 971280 2673581 363.29 871762 2673581 326.07 Lahi / Sarson 8097 2078512 3.90 11862 2673581 4.44 9014 2673581 3.37 Alsi 20 2078512 0.01 15 2673581 0.01 7 2673581 0.00 Til 34 2078512 0.02 40 2673581 0.01 25 2673581 0.01 Rendi 0 2078512 0.00 2673581 0.00 2673581 0.00 Groundnut 323 2078512 0.16 725 2673581 0.27 464 2673581 0.17 Sunflower 20 2078512 0.01 3 2673581 0.00 4 2673581 0.00 Soyabean 0 2078512 0.00 2673581 0.00 2673581 0.00 Total Oilseeds 8494 2078512 4.09 12645 2673581 4.73 9514 2673581 3.56 Sugarcane 856535 2078512 412.09 866209 2673581 323.99 593525 2673581 222.00 Potato 277877 2078512 133.69 245134 2673581 91.69 185564 2673581 69.41 Tobacco 824 2078512 0.40 227 2673581 0.08 129 2673581 0.05 Cotton 0 2078512 0.00 0 2673581 0.00 0 2673581 0.00 Sanai 0 2078512 0.00 0 2673581 0.00 0 2673581 0.00 Turmeric 17 2078512 0.01 0 2673581 0.00 0 2673581 0.00 115 Table 23: Per capita Annual food grain availability (in Kilogram) 2000-01 2005-06 2008-09 Per capita Per capita Per capita Total food grain Production in Total food grain Production in Total food grain Name of crop Production in (in Population availability (in metric Population availability (in metric Population availability metric tonnes) (Census 1991) in tonnes) (Census 2001) in tonnes) (Census 2001) in Kilogram Kilogram Kilogram District: Raebareli Rice 209971 2310074 90.89 282467 2872335 98.34 318375 2872335 110.84 Wheat 382444 2310074 165.55 380679 2872335 132.53 479250 2872335 166.85 Barley 7115 2310074 3.08 5128 2872335 1.79 6383 2872335 2.22 Jwar 11338 2310074 4.91 10495 2872335 3.65 6843 2872335 2.38 Millet 2101 2310074 0.91 1063 2872335 0.37 1317 2872335 0.46 Maize 105 2310074 0.05 209 2872335 0.07 151 2872335 0.05 Marhuva 82 2310074 0.04 2872335 0.00 2872335 0.00 Sanva 171 2310074 0.07 28 2872335 0.01 24 2872335 0.01 Koda 1 2310074 0.00 0 2872335 0.00 0 2872335 0.00 Cocoon 0 2310074 0.00 2872335 0.00 2872335 0.00 Kutki 0 2310074 0.00 2872335 0.00 2872335 0.00 Total Dhaan 613328 2310074 265.50 680069 2872335 236.77 812343 2872335 282.82 Urad 7131 2310074 3.09 6890 2872335 2.40 6552 2872335 2.28 Moong 455 2310074 0.20 484 2872335 0.17 426 2872335 0.15 Masoor 144 2310074 0.06 231 2872335 0.08 192 2872335 0.07 Gram 8975 2310074 3.89 8407 2872335 2.93 7473 2872335 2.60 Pea 4831 2310074 2.09 4764 2872335 1.66 4022 2872335 1.40 Arhar 16630 2310074 7.20 9149 2872335 3.19 4798 2872335 1.67 Moth 1 2310074 0.00 2872335 0.00 2872335 0.00 Total Pulses 38167 2310074 16.52 29925 2872335 10.42 23463 2872335 8.17 Total Food (Pulse 651495 2310074 282.02 709994 2872335 247.18 835806 2872335 290.98 Lahi / Sarson 5159 2310074 2.23 5492 2872335 1.91 6886 2872335 2.40 Alsi 108 2310074 0.05 97 2872335 0.03 40 2872335 0.01 Til 232 2310074 0.10 290 2872335 0.10 475 2872335 0.17 Rendi 0 2310074 0.00 2872335 0.00 2872335 0.00 Groundnut 1833 2310074 0.79 1755 2872335 0.61 1375 2872335 0.48 Sunflower 74 2310074 0.03 484 2872335 0.17 50 2872335 0.02 Soyabean 0 2310074 0.00 0 2872335 0.00 0 2872335 0.00 Total Oilseeds 7406 2310074 3.21 8118 2872335 2.83 8826 2872335 3.07 Sugarcane 214856 2310074 93.01 234253 2872335 81.55 150007 2872335 52.22 Potato 80202 2310074 34.72 106177 2872335 36.97 83558 2872335 29.09 Tobacco 63 2310074 0.03 5 2872335 0.00 6 2872335 0.00 Cotton 0 2310074 0.00 0 2872335 0.00 0 2872335 0.00 Sanai 8 2310074 0.00 14 2872335 0.00 4 2872335 0.00 Turmeric 9 2310074 0.00 162 2872335 0.06 38 2872335 0.01 Source: http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/select_distt_yr.asp 116 Table 24: Blockwise agricultural labour Year 1991 Year 2001 % of % of District Name Block Name Agricultural Total Agricultural Total Agricultura Agricultur labourers workers labourers workers l labour al labour Shukul Bazar 8669 37635 23.0 5553 45245 12.3 Amethi Jagdishpur 10982 42050 26.1 7546 58779 12.8 Singhpur 10878 46221 23.5 8609 60063 14.3 Trivediganj 6975 44816 15.6 5771 58604 9.8 Barabanki Haidargarh 12550 51566 24.3 8678 58602 14.8 Raebareli Shivgarh 4619 28845 16.0 4539 37397 12.1 Total/Avg. Project Area 54673 251133 21.8 40696 318690 12.8 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh 1991 & 2001 (Table- 8) 117 Table 25: Fertilizers Consumption per hectare of area sown (kg) District Name Block Name Nitrogen Phosphorus Potash Total 2000-01 (Kg/Ha) Shukul Bazar 76.84 18.26 2.48 97.58 Amethi Jagdishpur 73.87 17.71 2.58 94.16 Singhpur 77.17 24.29 1.30 102.76 Trivediganj 135.84 41.36 6.76 183.96 Barabanki Haidargarh 94.23 48.24 5.42 147.88 Raebareli Shivgarh 66.82 17.70 1.17 85.69 Total/Avg. Project Area 87.46 27.92 3.29 118.67 2005-06 (Kg/Ha) Shukul Bazar 81.51 21.32 5.34 108.17 Amethi Jagdishpur 88.23 23.21 5.40 116.84 Singhpur 79.29 29.89 3.06 112.24 Trivediganj 111.70 36.70 13.33 161.72 Barabanki Haidargarh 87.69 45.46 12.95 146.09 Raebareli Shivgarh 71.02 22.55 3.11 96.68 Total/Avg. Project Area 86.57 29.85 7.20 123.62 2008-09 (Kg/Ha) Shukul Bazar 107.77 22.71 5.25 135.72 Amethi Jagdishpur 114.53 23.91 5.12 143.57 Singhpur 133.78 43.96 6.59 184.33 Trivediganj 179.04 35.58 6.08 220.70 Barabanki Haidargarh 137.85 47.84 6.66 192.34 Raebareli Shivgarh 152.36 46.70 7.69 206.75 Total/Avg. Project Area 137.56 36.78 6.23 180.57 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh 2001, 2006 & 2010 (Table 26) 118 Table 26: Districtwise facilities for Livestock Animal Artificial Artificial Sheep Veterinary Animal Pig devl. Piggery devl. fertility fertility devl. Poultry District Name Block Name hospital breeding Centre unit centre centre subcentre Centre unit (No.) (No.) farm(No.)` (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.)` (No.) Blockwise 2000-01 Shukul Bazar 2 5 2 4 0 0 1 1 0 Amethi Jagdishpur 2 4 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 Singhpur 3 4 5 0 0 1 1 0 0 Trivediganj 3 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 Barabanki Haidargarh 4 12 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 Raebareli Shivgarh 1 4 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 Total/Avg. Project Area 15 39 34 8 0 2 3 1 0 Blockwise 2005-06 Shukul Bazar 2 0 5 3 0 0 1 1 0 Amethi Jagdishpur 2 0 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 Singhpur 3 0 1 4 0 1 1 0 0 Trivediganj 3 0 10 13 0 0 0 0 0 Barabanki Haidargarh 4 0 12 16 0 0 0 0 0 Raebareli Shivgarh 1 1 2 3 0 0 1 0 0 Total/Avg. Project Area 15 1 34 42 0 2 3 1 0 Blockwise 2008-09 Shukul Bazar 2 0 5 3 0 0 0 1 0 Amethi Jagdishpur 2 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 Singhpur 3 0 1 4 0 1 1 0 0 Trivediganj 3 0 10 13 0 0 0 0 0 Barabanki Haidargarh 3 0 12 16 0 0 0 0 0 Raebareli Shivgarh 1 1 2 3 0 0 1 0 0 Total/Avg. Project Area 14 1 34 42 0 1 2 1 0 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh 2001 (Table�30) 119 Table 27: Blockwise Livestock Population, 1997 Animal census 1997 Bovine (Desi) Bovine (cross breed) More than More than More than Calf (Males More than 2,5 2,5 yrs Calf Total District Name Block Name 3 3 & Females) yrs (Male) (Female) (Males & Bovine yrs (Female s) Total Total yrs (Male) Females) Shukul Bazar 3483 2717 16881 23081 8 651 380 1039 24120 Amethi Jagdishpur 10425 7523 11178 29126 200 539 1023 1762 30888 Singhpur 12556 6398 5426 24380 316 220 201 737 25117 Trivediganj 9818 7777 8208 25803 4665 2645 3111 10421 36224 Barabanki Haidargarh 5649 5018 6798 17465 2079 1057 1912 5048 22513 Raebareli Shivgarh 24681 10637 10883 46201 135 248 361 744 46945 Total/Avg. Project Area 66612 40070 59374 166056 7403 5360 6988 19751 185807 Animal census 2003 Bovine (Desi) Bovine (cross breed) More than More More than Calf (Males More than Calf Total District Name Block Name 3 than 2,5 3 & Total 2,5 yrs (Males & Total Bovine yrs (Female yrs yrs (Male) Females) (Male) Females) s) (Female) Shukul Bazar 3483 2717 16881 23081 8 651 380 1039 24120 Amethi Jagdishpur 10425 7523 11178 29126 200 539 1023 1762 30888 Singhpur 4469 6790 5999 17258 174 333 263 770 18028 Trivediganj 5958 9714 7394 23066 628 1245 1116 2989 26055 Barabanki Haidargarh 3427 6266 6122 15815 368 838 728 1934 17749 Raebareli Shivgarh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total/Avg. Project Area 27762 33010 47574 108346 1378 3606 3510 8494 116840 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh 1997 & 2003 (Table� 29) 120 Table 27: Blockwise Livestock Population, 1997 Animal census 1997 Mahish Jaatiya Sheep More than Total goat Total More Calf (Males District Name Block Name 3 Cross (Male & (horse & than 3 & Total Pure Total yrs (Female breed Female) pony) yrs (Male) Females) s) Shukul Bazar 143 2147 3382 5672 234 210 444 7474 132 Amethi Jagdishpur 432 3815 5590 9837 565 0 565 8713 198 Singhpur 2208 5498 4059 11765 576 75 651 6538 193 Trivediganj 981 7435 8492 16908 1630 678 2308 13977 237 Barabanki Haidargarh 788 9249 8901 18938 80 150 230 16204 346 Raebareli Shivgarh 838 11000 9830 21668 943 78 1021 15098 443 Total/Avg. Project Area 5390 39144 40254 84788 4028 1191 5219 68004 1549 Animal census 2003 Mahish Jaatiya Sheep More than Total goat Total More Calf (Males District Name Block Name 3 Cross (Male & (horse & than 3 & Total Pure Total yrs (Female breed Female) pony) yrs (Male) Females) s) Shukul Bazar 143 2147 3382 5672 234 210 444 7474 132 Amethi Jagdishpur 432 3815 5590 9837 565 0 565 8713 198 Singhpur 1943 5003 3815 10761 313 15 328 7159 123 Trivediganj 579 8873 9007 18459 1083 122 1205 11880 108 Barabanki Haidargarh 464 11037 9441 20942 53 27 80 13773 157 Raebareli Shivgarh 737 10020 9240 19997 501 15 516 16489 281 Total/Avg. Project Area 4298 40895 40475 85668 2749 389 3138 65488 999 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh 1997 & 2003 (Table� 29) 121 Table 27: Blockwise Livestock Population, 1997 Animal census 1997 Pig Total coc Other Total Other Total District Name Block Name Cross bre k, hen & Pure Total animals animals poultry poultry ed chicks Shukul Bazar 3437 2343 5780 158 43780 2742 27 2769 Amethi Jagdishpur 8363 5990 14353 276 64830 1160 1715 2875 Singhpur 4873 806 5679 45 49988 2161 99 2260 Trivediganj 10672 4286 14958 596 85208 7009 168 7177 Barabanki Haidargarh 10402 2851 13253 482 71966 8689 178 8867 Raebareli Shivgarh 8007 668 8675 278 94128 9552 681 10233 Total/Avg. Project Area 45754 16944 62698 1835 409900 31313 2868 34181 Animal census 2003 Pig Total coc Other Total Other Total District Name Block Name Cross bre k, hen & Pure Total animals animals poultry poultry ed chicks Shukul Bazar 3437 2343 5780 158 43780 2742 27 2769 Amethi Jagdishpur 8363 5990 14353 276 64830 1160 1715 2875 Singhpur 3955 269 4224 23 40646 2170 133 2303 Trivediganj 6307 676 6983 278 64968 4335 42 4377 Barabanki Haidargarh 6147 451 6598 226 59525 5374 45 5419 Raebareli Shivgarh 6493 225 6718 142 44143 9404 913 10317 Total/Avg. Project Area 34702 9954 44656 1103 317892 25185 2875 28060 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh 1997 & 2003 (Table� 29) 122 Table 28: Reservoir Fish Production Departmental Reservoir Distributi Revenue Private Reservoir Productio on of from District Name Block Name Area Area Production No. n Angulikao distributed No. (Hectare) (Hectare) (quintal) (quintal) (in Angulikao Blockwise 2001-02 Shukul Bazar 0 - - 850 - 0 - - Amethi Jagdishpur 0 - - 850 - 0 - - Singhpur 0 - - 981 - 0 - - Trivediganj 0 - - 846 - 0 - - Barabanki Haidargarh 0 - - 1430 - 0 - - Raebareli Shivgarh 0 - - 814 - 0 - - Total/Avg. Project Area 0 - - 5771 - 0 - - Blockwise 2005-06 Shukul Bazar 0 - - 900 63000 26 20 48 Amethi Jagdishpur 0 - - 850 59500 26 16 63 Singhpur 0 - - 150 10500 15 10 237 Trivediganj 0 - - 70 4900 2 - 25 Barabanki Haidargarh 0 - - 355 25550 2 1 40 Raebareli Shivgarh 0 - - 392 27440 7 4 90 Total/Avg. Project Area 0 - - 2717 190890 78 51 503 Blockwise 2009-10 Shukul Bazar 0 - - 80 680 32 13 39 Amethi Jagdishpur 0 - - 100 850 34 14 40 Singhpur 0 - - 77 6545 15 10 278 Trivediganj 0 - - 140 11900 2 1 40 Barabanki Haidargarh 0 - - 104 8840 2 1 45 Raebareli Shivgarh 0 - - 110 9000 7 4 92 Total/Avg. Project Area 0 - - 611 37815 92 43 534 Source: Planning Commission Uttar Pradesh 2001, 2006 & 2009 (Table-31) http://updes.up.nic.in/spatrika/engspatrika/select_distt_yr.asp 123 Soil Quality Status 124 District wise Micro-Nutrient Status-2005-06 to 2007-2008 Sulpher Element Index Level No. of No. of Sl.No. District Block Element Samples Level Samples Zinc Copper Iron Mn Zinc Copper Iron Magzine Index 1 Raebareli Shivgarh 61 1.44 D 69 2.09 2.58 2.32 2.94 M S M S 2 Singhpur 115 1.32 D 131 1.95 2.31 2.36 2.59 M M M S Amethi Jagdishpur 120 1.80 M 120 1.79 1.62 1.78 1.77 M D M M Sukulbazar 29 1.48 D 29 1.48 1.77 1.46 1.84 D M D M 3 Haidergarh 196 1.76 M 196 1.94 2.05 1.90 1.98 M M M M Barabanki Trivediganj 278 1.64 D 278 2.00 1.66 2.02 1.72 M D M M District wise Micro-Nutrient Status-2009-10 Sulpher Element Index Level No. of No. of Sl.No. District Block Element Magzin Samples Level Samples Zinc Copper Iron Zinc Copper Iron Magzine Index e 1 Raebareli Shivgarh 53 1.49 D 53 2.10 2.60 2.40 2.80 M S M S Tiloi 234 1.47 D 234 2.40 2.52 2.60 3.00 M S S S 2 Amethi Singhpur 68 1.22 D 68 2.10 2.60 2.70 3.00 M S S S Jagdishpur 95 1.84 M 95 1.90 2.12 2.02 2.73 M M M S Sukulbazar 101 2.00 M 101 1.91 2.43 1.98 2.85 M M M S 3 Barabanki Haidergarh 160 1.84 M 160 1.60 2.39 2.23 2.41 D M M M Trivediganj 140 1.71 M 140 1.66 2.13 2.27 2.30 D M M M M Marginal Note: S Sufficient D Difficient 125 District wise NPK Status Haidergarh Branch-2009-10 Sl. No. of Element Index Fertility Level District Block Name No. Samples N P K N P K 1 Raebareli Shivgarh 327 1.47 1.38 3.82 VL VL H 2 Singhpur 268 1.35 1.33 3.75 VL VL H Jagdishpur 1444 1.81 1.52 3.65 L VL H Amethi Sukulbazar 1314 2.16 1.85 2.86 L L M 3 Haidergarh 1200 1.97 1.66 2.93 L VL M Barabanki Trivediganj 1228 1.97 1.60 2.84 L VL M Note: VL Very Low L Low M Medium H High Carbon Status of Haidergarh Branch-2009-10 Sl. Biological Carbon District Block Name No. of Samples No. Element Index Fertility Level 1 Raebareli Shivgarh 327 1.47 VL 2 Singhpur 268 1.35 VL Amethi Jagdishpur 1444 1.81 L Sukulbazar 1314 2.16 L 3 Haidergarh 1200 1.97 L Barabanki Trivediganj 1228 1.97 L Note: VL Very Low L Low 126 Annexure 4.3: Details of Main Canals & Ground Water in LGC 127 Ground Water Availability in Lower Ganga Canal System Annual Replenishable Groundwater Resource Natural Monsoon Season Non-monsoon Season Discharge Net Annual SI. Recharge Recharge during Ground District Recharge Recharge No. from from Total non- water from from monsoon Availability other other rainfall rainfall Season sources sources Year 2004 1 Auraiya 30736 18806 2440 27453 79435 6396 73039 2 Etah 63774 14639 11101 35911 125424 12542 112881 3 Etawah 30473 17072 2517 27186 77248 6413 70835 4 Farrukhabad 35019 11389 3249 18509 68166 3835 64331 5 Fatehpur 69339 20555 6142 42878 138914 9538 129376 6 Firozabad 34663 10397 6519 26131 77709 7173 70537 7 Kannauj 35074 10387 3346 29425 78232 7171 71061 8 Kanpur Dehat 51749 13725 4026 26667 96167 7059 89108 9 Kanpur Nagar 48148 17906 3454 31221 100728 8067 92662 10 Kasganj NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 11 Kaushambi 28808 7696 1295 7358 45158 3313 41845 12 Mainpuri 39343 15596 7361 30377 92678 7566 85112 LGC Total 467126 158168 51450 303116 979859 79073 900787 State Total (ham) 3862644 1195084 563646 2013843 7635216 616926 7018290 State Total (bcm) 38.63 11.95 5.64 20.14 76.35 6.17 70.18 Year 2009 1 Auraiya 27575 11995 0 24839 64410 6441 57969 2 Etah 37178 14598 6614 21841 80231 8023 72208 3 Etawah 34523 13700 2387 26199 76809 7053 69756 4 Farrukhabad 41796 5229 4466 9879 61370 5172 56198 5 Fatehpur 61720 18877 0 26891 107488 6584 100904 6 Firozabad 32499 13226 6215 23870 75810 6152 69658 7 Kannauj 33862 10075 4123 21509 69569 5444 64125 8 Kanpur Dehat 54613 11689 0 22759 89060 8108 80952 9 Kanpur Nagar 46816 12432 0 24024 83272 7591 75681 10 Kasganj 30156 10702 5027 16261 62147 6215 55932 11 Kaushambhi 31076 6101 1295 6411 44883 3950 40933 12 Mainpuri 39291 14615 7655 31395 92956 7569 85387 LGC Total 471105 143239 37782 255878 908005 78302 829703 State Total (ham) 4077837 1136994 541075 1769552 7525458 668004 6857454 State Total (bcm) 40.78 11.37 5.41 17.7 75.25 6.68 68.57 Source: Central Ground Water Board 128 Annual Ground Water Draft and Stage of ground water development Annual Ground Water Draft Projected Net Ground demand Water Stage of for Domestic& Availability Ground Sl. Domestic District Industrial for Water No. Irrigation Total and Water Future Development Industrial Supply Irrigation (Y.) uses use upto 2025 Year 2004 1 Auraiya 39645 2311 41955 3026 30368 57 2 Etah 81879 6550 88430 9826 21177 78 3 Etawah 27382 2307 29689 2965 40489 42 4 Faizabad 68602 4699 73302 7795 33675 67 5 Farrukhabad 45661 2299 47961 3104 15565 75 6 Fatehpur 86372 4869 91241 6778 36226 71 7 Firozabad 52724 4049 56773 6073 11739 80 8 Kanpur Dehat 40663 3340 44003 4141 44305 49 9 Kanpur Nagar 58727 3666 62393 5306 28629 67 10 Kasganj NA NA NA NA NA NA 11 Kaushambi 22502 2598 25100 4256 15087 60 12 Mainpuri 64689 4953 69643 7430 12993 82 LGC Total 588846 41641 630490 60700 290253 66 State Total (ham) 4536196 342241 4878436 530337 1951757 70 State Total (bcm) 45.36 3.42 48.78 5.30 19.52 70 Year 2009 1 Auraiya 40712 2605 43317 3312 13945 75 2 Etah 57117 3413 60530 4620 10471 84 3 Etawah 36713 2440 39153 2900 30143 56 4 Farrukhabad 36398 3104 39502 4225 15574 70 5 Fatehpur 79378 5274 84652 12061 9465 84 6 Firozabad 66297 3791 70088 5142 -1781 101 7 Kannauj 41160 2767 43927 3429 19537 69 8 Kanpur Dehat 51721 3554 55275 4632 24598 68 9 Kanpur Nagar 57709 3331 61040 4259 13713 81 10 Kasganj 40497 2363 42860 2890 12545 77 11 Kaushambhi 29477 3136 32613 5753 5703 80 12 Mainpuri 65549 3942 69491 5784 14054 81 LGC Total 602728 39720 642448 59007 167967 77 State Total (ham) 4599580 348728 4948308 536083 1721792 72 State Total (bcm) 46 3.49 49.48 5.36 17.22 72 Source: Central Ground Water Board Semi-Critical, Critical and over exploited blocks in Districts of LGC System Semi-Critical Critical Over Exploited District 2004 2009 2004 2009 2004 2009 129 Semi-Critical Critical Over Exploited District 2004 2009 2004 2009 2004 2009 Auraiya Bidhuna - - - - - Etah Jalesar Saket - - Marehra Markara Nidholikalan Nidhauli Kalan - - Sakeet - - Aliganj - - - - Farrukhabad Mohamadabad - Kamalganj - Barhpur - Fatehpur Airawan Airayan - Amauli - - Deomai Bahua - Haswa - - - Deomai - Hathgaon - - - Khajuha - Malawan - - - Teliyani - - - - - Vijayeepur - - - - Firozabad Madnapur Madanapur - - - Aron Shikohabad - - - - Eka Tundla - Firozabad - - Firozabad - - - - - Narkhi - - - - - Tundla Kannauj Jalalabad Kannauj - - - Jalalabad Kannauj Talgram - - - - Talgram - - - - - Kanpur Nagar - Ghatampur - Bhitar Gaon - - - Sarsaul - - - - Shivrajpur Shivrajpur - - - - Kasganj - - - - Kasganj Kasganj Kaushambi Chail Newada - Kara - Chail - - - Manjhanpur - Sirathu - - - Moorat Ganj - - Mainpuri Barnahal - - - - Barnahal - - - - - Mainpuri Total 15 16 2 8 4 12 Source: Central Ground Water Board 130 District wise Ground Water Resources Available, Utilization and Stage of Development in Haidergarh Branch Area (2009) Annual Replenishable Ground Water Resources Natural Monsoon Season Non-Monsoon Season Net Annual Discharge District Recharge G/w Recharge Recharge Recharge from Total during non- from other Availability from rainfall from rainfall other sources monsoon seasn sources Barabanki 86140 38678 18101 70064 212983 21298 191685 Raebareli 56314 22463 10683 34227 123686 10890 112796 Amethi 81834 44297 0 50523 176654 15586 161068 Average Source: Central Ground Water Board Annual G/W Draft Projected Demand for Stage of G/W G/W Availability for future District Domistic & Domestic and development Irrigation Total irrigation Industrial uses Industrial uses (%) upto 2025 Barabanki 125096 6891 131987 10203 56386 69 Raebareli 76773 6777 83551 9718 26305 74 Amethi 108346 8113 116459 13344 39378 72 Average 71.12 Source: Central Ground Water Board 131 Annexure 4.4: Year wise Surface Water Quality Status 132 Surface Water Quality Lower Ganga Canal Districts Kannauj U/S Kannauj Bithoor Kanpur U/S Kanpur D/S (Jajmau Pumping Year (Rajghat) D/S (Kanpur) (Ranighat) Station) Fecal Coliform (MPN/100ml) 2003 919 1478 1022 1089 4911 2004 994 1101 950 939 3484 2005 4300 5471 3611 2813 26167 2006 6243 7314 4000 3543 22857 2007 2033 3389 2151 2633 32889 2008 3567 3080 3125 3190 16818 Biological Oxygen Demand (mg/l) 2002 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 2003 2.3 3.3 2.6 2.7 5.0 2004 2.7 3.4 2.4 2.3 6.9 2005 2.8 3.0 2.3 1.8 5.2 2006 3.6 3.5 3.3 3.0 6.3 2007 3.4 3.9 2.7 2.9 6.1 2008 3.6 4.1 3.5 3.4 8.3 Dissolve Oxygen (mg/l) 2002 7.5 7.5 7.6 7.7 6.4 2003 6.4 6.4 6.7 6.9 5.8 2004 6.8 6.8 6.7 6.9 4.6 2005 7.3 6.8 7.3 7 5.8 2006 7.3 7.9 7.6 6.7 3.9 2007 7.8 7.7 7.5 7.7 5.5 2008 7.4 7.1 7.4 7.6 5.6 Source: Central Pollution Control Board 133 Ground Water Quality Data Above Permissible Limit Sl. No. of *Type of District Name Block Name No. Testing Source F Cl Fe Mg pH Ca TDS NO3 Hardnes SO4 Tur.NT R Cl Coli. E-Coli Cu As Alkalinity Al Mn (mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/l) (pH) (mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/l) s (mg/l) U (mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/l) 1 AURAIYA AURAIYA 454 DT, OW 1 - 1 4 1 - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - NIDHAULI - - - 61 - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 ETAH KALAN 97 DT 3 ETAH SAKIT 156 DT - - - 94 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 ETAH SHITALPUR 22 DT - - - 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 ETAWAH BADAPURA 505 DT, ST 25 1 1 - 122 - - 11 1 1 - 1 1 - - - - - - 6 ETAWAH BASREHAR 33 DT, ST 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - 7 ETAWAH BHARTHANA 274 ST 17 - - - 24 - - - 1 5 - - - - - - - - - JASWANTNAGA DT, ST & 23 - - - 97 - - 1 - 8 26 1 - - - - - - - 8 ETAWAH R 290 DP 9 ETAWAH MAHEWA 194 DT, ST 5 - - - 5 - - 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - 10 ETAWAH SAIFAI 30 ST 1 - - - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 ETAWAH TAKHA 161 ST 3 1 - - 4 1 1 - - 1 - - - - - - - - - FARRUKHABA - - - - - - - 5 - - - - - - - - - - - 12 D KAYAMGANJ 1938 DT 13 FATEHPUR ARAIN 2036 DP - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 14 FATEHPUR ASOYER 2235 ST - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15 FATEHPUR BAHUA 2327 ST 1 - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - 16 FATEHPUR BHITAURA 2511 DT - 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17 FATEHPUR BIJAIPUR 2283 ST 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18 FATEHPUR HASWA 2322 ST - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - 19 FATEHPUR THATHA 2452 ST - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 20 FATEHPUR KHAJUHA 3282 ST - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 FATEHPUR TELIYANI 1964 ST - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - 22 FIROZABAD ARAON 286 ST 6 - 1 - 3 - 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - 1 134 23 FIROZABAD EKA 224 ST 2 - 1 1 2 - 2 1 - - - - 1 - - - - - - 24 FIROZABAD JASRANA 303 DT, ST 15 - 3 - 3 - 3 1 - - - 2 1 - - - - - - 25 FIROZABAD MADANPUR 353 DT,ST 5 2 14 - 5 - 3 - - - - 1 - - - - - - - 26 FIROZABAD SHIKOHABAD 289 ST 11 - 2 - 4 - - - - - - - 1 - - 3 - - - 27 KANNAUJ HASERAN 1940 DT, ST 1 - 1 - 7 - - 3 1 - 2 1 1 - - - - 1 - 28 KANNAUJ SAURIKH 1295 ST - - - - 2 - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - 29 KANNAUJ UMARDA 2240 DT,ST 1 - 4 - 9 - - 1 - - 12 8 1 - - - 1 - - KANPUR - - - - - - 4 - 1 - - - - - - - - - - 30 DEHAT MAITHA 425 DT KANPUR - 1 - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 31 DEHAT SARVANKHEDA 452 DT KANPUR - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 32 DEHAT AKBARPUR 549 ST KANPUR - - - - 2 - 1 - 1 - - - - - - - - - - 33 DEHAT DERAPUR 401 ST KANPUR - - - - - - 1 - 1 - - - - - - - - - - 34 DEHAT RAJPUR 420 ST KANPUR - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 35 DEHAT MALASA 444 ST KANPUR - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - 36 DEHAT JHINJHAK 484 ST KANPUR 1 3 - - - - - - 3 - - 1 - - - - - - - 37 NAGAR BHITARGAON 496 DT KANPUR 1 - 1 - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - 38 NAGAR BIDHANU 196 DT KANPUR 2 3 - - 3 - - - 4 - 2 - 1 - - - - - - 39 NAGAR BILHAUR 1261 DT,ST KANPUR 2 9 - - 4 - 4 - 11 - - - - - - - - - - 40 NAGAR GHATAMPUR 1900 DT,ST KANPUR - - - - - - - - 5 - - - - - - - - - - 41 NAGAR KAKWAN 225 DT KANPUR 3 4 - - - - - - 4 - - - - - - - - - - 42 NAGAR KALYANPUR 776 ST KANPUR 1 1 - - - - 1 - 7 - - - - - - - - - - 43 NAGAR PATARA 356 DT,ST 135 KANPUR - 1 - - 1 - - - 3 - - - - - - - - - - 44 NAGAR SARSAUL 985 ST KANPUR - 10 - - - - 1 - 6 - - - - - - - - - - 45 NAGAR SHIVRAJPUR 235 DT,ST 46 MAINPURI GHIROR 78 DT 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 47 MAINPURI MAINPURI 385 DT - - - - 5 - - - 3 - - - - - - - - - - 48 MAINPURI BEWAR 103 DT - - 1 - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 49 MAINPURI KARHAL 81 DT - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 50 KAUSHAMBI SIRATHU 2788 ST,DT 2 - 2 - 2 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - 51 KAUSHAMBI NEWADA 2193 ST,DT 5 5 5 - 5 - 4 - 3 2 - 10 - 5 - - - 6 5 52 KAUSHAMBI MANJHANPUR 2444 ST - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 53 KAUSHAMBI KARA 1702 ST - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 54 KAUSHAMBI SARSAWAN 2987 ST,DT - - - - - - 1 - 1 - - 1 - - - - - - - 55 KAUSHAMBI KAUSHAMBI 2442 DT - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - 56 Kanshiram Nagar PATIYALI 60 DT - - - 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 57364 *Deep Tubewell =DT, Openwell = OW, Shallow Tubewell=ST, Delivery Point=DP Fluoride= F, Chloride= Cl, Iron= Fe, Magnesium=mg, Calcium= Ca, Nitrate= NO3, Sulphates= SO4, Turbidity =Tur,Copper=Cu, Arsenic=As, Resydual Chlorine=R Cl Aluminium=Al,Manganese=Mn,Hardness=Ha Sourc http://indiawater.gov.in/imisreports/Reports/WaterQuality/rpt_WQM_EntryStatusL e abTesting_D.aspx?Rep=0&RP=Y 136 Annexure 5.1: Findings of FGD 137 Findings of Focussed Group Discussion in District Kasganj Irrigation: The present canal system dates back to 1885. The discharge in the canal system is higher than the designed capacity and hence requires remodeling. Increased discharge and lack of wings in the canal has caused seepage, soil erosion and breaching of the canals. Gates in minor canals are also lacking. There is an urgent need for lining of minors, desilting of drains and installation of silt traps. Drainage system need to be improved and developed. Maintenance requires budgetary support which is not adequate and regular at this moment. The issue of cutting of canals is very rampant in the district and any initiatives by the Irrigation Department to regulate it turns out to be futile. ‘Seejpaals’ who are the field level personnel of the department are often manhandled/threatened by the farmers in case they try to object canal cutting or report the matter for disciplinary action. There are reported instances of pilferage of transformers and oil as well. Paddy is the predominant crop. Crops require 5-6 waterings these days and hence the demand has increased as compared to the available infrastructure. Only two times watering is possible in tail end farms. Tube wells have been installed by the farmers to supplement irrigation needs, especially where canal network is absent or where canal is not able to provide enough water for irrigation (tail end farms). The de-silting works in the mains and distributaries are carried out by the department whereas those in the minor and feeder channels are done under MGNREGA. Barren land has decreased owing to development of irrigation facilities in the command area. However, area adjacent to Ganga are inaccessible and needs treatment like clearing of shrubs and electrification and restricts public movement. Paddy and wheat are the major crops grown in the district requiring high consumption of water. However due to canal cutting and diversion of water at different points along the canal, the amount of water available for irrigation at the tail end of the canal is very little and only two watering are possible. Installation of tube wells have resulted in dropping of ground water table. Health: Water and vector borne diseases in areas prone to water logging have been reported. Sanitation related works are handled by the Gram Sabhas in the villages. The health related problems have been incorporated in NRHM. Increased availability of water and water logging may increase threat of water and vector borne diseases. However, application of larvicidal for elimination of mosquito breeding would alleviate the threat. Also access to health services is poor in villages across Ganga River. Agriculture: Crops are grown in Kharif, Rabi and Zaid season. Rabi and Zaid season needs more watering. Timely availability of water is essential which is not happening currently thus affecting productivity and overall income for farmers. Drainage system is improper. The worst affected are small and marginal farmers. Rabi crops can be sown in time but Kharif crops are affected. Padiyali, Kadarganj and Soron blocks of the district are affected with sodicity (usar). The Diversified Agriculture Support Project (DASP) is under last phase of implementation. Therefore, there is a need for supply of gypsum for reclamation of barren land. Pulse crops can increase productivity in Kharif and Zaid season. 138 Horticulture: Mango, Guava, Citrus fruits and spices are grown primarily in the district. Big farmers do not venture into vegetable farming and it’s only done by small and marginal farmers without the provision of adequate water for irrigation. This calls for installation of sprinkler or drip irrigation systems for effective use of water. The old variety of sugarcane grown locally is rejected by sugarcane mills. New varieties of sugarcane needs promotion in the district. Further, the need for a Research Centre on Sugarcane for improving the quality of sugarcane was also highlighted. The head (reach) of the canal has reportedly high ground water level and hence tube wells could be introduced for promoting conjunctive use of ground and surface water. This conjunctive use of surface and ground water could reduce demand of water for irrigation in the head reach leading to increased availability of canal water in tail reach where the demand for canal water is higher (due to lower water levels) but the flow is reduced. The Minor Irrigation Department can consider this proposal which will enable access to water to tail end farms. However, higher cost of pumping water from tube well makes it an unfavorable proposition with farmers in Head Reach who prefer canal for irrigation. Forests and Wildlife: ‘Nilgai’ and wild pigs cause extensive damage to standing crops thus resulting in losses and hence farm lands need fencing, etc. to protect their crops. Peas in particular are destroyed by wild pigs. There is a scope for afforestation along the canal. Co-operatives: It was informed that both KRIBHCO and IFFCO have been successfully functioning in the district. However, it was suggested that the Vaidyanathan Committee recommendations of providing financial support to ‘samitis’ (farmer’s co-operatives) should be followed. Suggestions: Training should be provided to farmers at the Nyaya Panchayat level for effective use of irrigation water and sensitization towards equal rights to natural resources. Training to address current method of flood irrigation by introducing improved water use efficiency technologies and farming practices is required.  Will involve women in mobilizing the community against acts like canal cutting etc.  The Agriculture department will consider involving the Irrigation department in its training so that a comprehensive orientation can be done for the farmers on crop and water management.  Installation of private tube wells at the head of the canal can prevent canal cutting to a great extent and ensure adequate availability of water at the tail end.  Water User’s Associations to be formed by November and women’s participation will be ensured as per the PIM, 2009 Act. Education: Overall improvement in education has been attributed to schemes in education of State Government and SSA. Overall women’s co-operation is good in agriculture at the village level. They do follow mixed cropping which has been ensured by training of women involved in agriculture. A 139 case in point is introduction of mustard with wheat solely by women. Women participate in all aspects of farming activities except for irrigation. Drinking water supply: Kasganj lies in dark zone with respect to ground water zonation based on the ground water table. Drinking water supply is based on hand pumps and tube wells. In urban areas piped water supply is used to provide drinking water whereas in rural areas there are 26 piped water supply schemes and hand pumps (IM II) covering the entire district. This is to prevent water borne diseases. However, some habitations are not covered with water supply schemes and some hand pumps become dysfunctional every year. This indicates lack of services in potable water supply. Treated water is supplied through overhead tanks. Revenue department: Patwari and Gram Panchayat Secretary should be a part of the training programmes conducted by Irrigation and Agriculture departments for farmers and villagers in general. Observations: There has been no engagement with PRIs so far in the implementation of irrigation schemes despite a few orientation camps to mobilize villagers stakeholders suggested more camps and joint training sessions should be organized at the Panchayat level. The agriculture and irrigation department officials have been of the common view that the sprinkler system is ideal to tackle the irrigation problem which will also result in effective use of water. Interaction with community members in Nadrai village including Administrative and Revenue officials:  There is no immediate benefit of the Lower Ganga Canal (LGC) or Parallel Lower Ganga Canal (PLGC) to the community living next to it. PLGC, a feeder canal system was constructed in 1975 to cater to irrigation needs of Kharif cropping season and is active in this season only.  The Nadrai aqueduct (also called as Hazara Nahar) built on LGC over Kali river was constructed in the year 1889 and requires maintenance (proposed as an activity in UPWSRP - Phase II) and may be declared as a heritage structure.  The natural drainage has been choked/altered. Roads have been constructed on drains under MGNREGS. Further, under Chakbandi System, earlier drains in farmlands were left as it is. However, under MGNREGS, the drains have been reclaimed by covering with earthen materials. It was opined that if 5% land can be spared, the issue of alteration in drainage system could be addressed.  Desilting works in Distributaries and minors could be taken up under MGNREGS.  Findings of Focussed Group Discussion in District Etah  No sewerage facility exists in Etah.  Groundwater is contaminated in many places in the district.  Canal cutting is a grave issue affecting irrigation efficiency. 140  There has been no training of farmers, villagers and PRIs members so far by the Irrigation Department on issues like water use efficiency and management of conflicts relating to water use for irrigation. Community meeting in Kartala Gram Panchayat:  The reason behind cutting of canals is the reduced width of the distributaries and minor canal. Growth of vegetation and deposition of earthen materials along the banks of the distributaries, minors and field channels (gools) lead to reduced width, thus resulting in reduced water availability. This prompts farmers to tamper with kulaba system by cutting the minor and increasing the width of gools to get water to the farms. Because of this, tail end farmer get reduced flow of water or no water at all.  The cleaning and desilting of the distributaries, field channels or gool does not take place regularly – only once a year because of which, the water flow reduces. Because of poor drainage and maintenance of gool, water from farm lands can’t be drained properly. Maintenance of Gool does not come under in the jurisdiction of Irrigation Department.  The discharge in canal network is higher than the original design and capacity of the canal. Nevertheless, the water demand and increased area under agriculture and cropping intensity, make the current canal network not being able to meet the demands.  Funds available under MGNREGS should and can be used to clean and desilt the distributaries and field channels. The panchayat may take this responsibility after seeking permission from the Irrigation Department.  Training and sensitization of especially big farmers is important to motivate them for effective water use and desist from actions like canal cutting to ensure equitable distribution of water to all.  Overall productivity has decreased since the last 10 years. This is mainly due to the fact that water and fertilisers (Urea/DAP) are not available on time. Farmers use Urea/DAP based on their availability and not on the basis of requirement of soil. Vermi compost has been attempted but there is further need for trainings to ensure replication. The low farm income has affected children in pursuing their higher education as it requires money. School education is however taken off through schemes like Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) and other programmes.  Farmers especially the small and marginal ones have used organic fertilizers like compost which have had a good impact on the productivity. However, this has not helped in spreading across to other farmers in a big way.  There has been an increase in migration due to fall in agricultural productivity and low soil output. People migrate to nearby towns and also to Delhi in search of employment.  Kartala village has usar land.  Peanut and Shivala has been introduced in the cropping pattern since 2009 by farmers based on their own initiative. Community members mentioned the use of bricks in gool repair and maintenance. Suggestion was also made to lay PVC pipes to strengthen gool system of irrigation. 141 3.3.3 Findings of Focussed Group Discussion in District Firozabad Agriculture: The production has been stagnant during the last five years due to weather related issues. Now it has started showing upward trend in recent times. Only 5% of the total sown area is irrigated and the rest are catered by private tubewells. This has resulted in extensive use of ground water and as such 5 blocks are in the dark zone. There has been very little instance of water logging in the canal irrigated area and paddy is the main crop grown in and around the waterlogged areas and the canal. The waterlogging is seasonal in nature (5-6 months in a year) as long as the canal carries water to its full capacity. There have been on farm demonstration of bio-fertilizers and SRI for paddy under the UPDASP programme which has resulted in many farmers adopting the techniques and benefitting in terms of higher yield. The farmers are now self motivated to use such innovative techniques for increasing productivity. Use of High Yielding Varieties have also resulted in increasing production. There are seed distribution centres at every Nyaya Panchayat level. The quality of soil can be termed as average if not good and farmers have become aware of the deteriorating soil condition in the district and have taken pro-active measures before the situation goes out of control. There are two soil testing laboratories in the district. The levels of nitrogen and potassium in the soil are as desired but the amount of phosphate is lesser than required. The department has undertaken numerous outreach programmes in the form of melas, goshtis (open discussion involving scientists and farmers), meetings etc. at the panchayat and block level to spread awareness on agriculture related issues. All this along with supply of good quality inputs have resulted in higher productivity which has translated into higher economic and social status of the farmers. The department ensures at least 30% participation of women in all workshops and discussions as they play a vital role in agriculture. However this is not possible everytime. There has been use of modern technologies like sms and helplines for dissemination of information but goshtis have been the most successful medium of reaching out, informing and mobilizing the farming community. The Goshtis are conducted in consultation with the Gram Panchayat. The department works closely with the Panchayat in a couple of areas. For e.g.: selection of beneficiaries. The district is the second highest in the state in terms of potato cultivation as many farmers are increasingly adopting cultivation of potato. There is however no sugarcane farming in the district. The district also holds the 2nd highest record in the state in terms of Bajra production. In the case of farm mechanization, the district has shown good results as farmers have been provided subsidies to purchase various agricultural implements including tractors. This has been particularly seen in the case of small and marginal farmers the majority of which grows potato. Although modernization of the canal system and improvement in its infrastructure along with setting up of WUAs will contribute to better use of water, the risk of overuse or exploitation still persists and hence subsidies should be provided for the purchase of sprinkler and drip irrigation sets along with on-farm demonstration and trouble shooting support for popularizing the same amongst the cultivators. 142 Horticulture: The National Horticulture Mission is currently not being implemented in the district but is expected to begin in the next 1-2 years. The department has been successful in growing potato, garlic, chilly, citrus fruits etc. through the farmers. There has been large scale conversion of net sown area under agriculture to horticulture because of potato. There are only two Government owned cold storages for seeds in the entire state. There are a couple of private cold storages but are not reliable and the department does not considers the seed storing process authentic in these cold storages. As regards the agricultural produce there are farmer managed cold storages mainly used for potato which are then sent all over the country. ‘Nilgai’ affects standing crops in a big way. Many a times they attack in large numbers which makes it difficult for the farmers to handle them and end up losing the crops. Forest Department: The reason for ‘Nilgai’ attacking the agricultural fields has been on account of their increasing numbers and corresponding decrease of pasture land. There is around 1600 ha of wasteland as per Forest department record and no wetlands in the district. This has also affected in the spotting of Siberian cranes as they no longer visit the district. The Irrigation, Forest and Soil and Water Conservation departments can work together in tackling the problem of waterlogging. Energy requirement is met by the villagers from the forests in the form of firewood. The most common species grown catering to firewood availability is Prosopis juliflora.They are grown as energy plantation. There are around 25 active Joint Forest Management Committees in the district. Around 3% area of total agricultural land is in the form of bunds which can be utilized through agro-forestry. Forestry results in recycling of nutrients, recharging of ground water whereas agriculture does just the opposite. Fisheries: Pisciculture in the district is mostly rain fed. Fish production has been hit in the last 6-7 years due to erratic and insufficient average rainfall. However the condition of pisciculture can improve with the co-operation of the Irrigation department. The major varieties of fish reared are Rohu, Katla and Mrigul. Mostly landless farmers take up pisciculture which has helped them to improve their socio-economic status. Further the department provides them training, subsidies etc. which helps them to improve their income. There is a new proposal by the irrigation department for the next financial year wherein all ponds are to be connected for boosting fish production. Many a times deepening of pond or desilting results in percolation of water through the pond or more sand siltation thus affecting fish production adversely. Hence this activity needs to be done in scientific manner. The water in the waterlogged areas is rich in nutrients and highly suitable for pisciculture. However there have not been any attempts under any programme to channelize that water to a nearby pond which would have solved the waterlogging and connected issues and also would have enabled efficient use of water. This can be taken up under MGNREGS. The banks do not provide adequate loans for pisciculture as the applicants are mostly landless or small farmers who do not have much assets. 143 Drinking water: Piped water supply system covers most parts of the district. Excess fluoride in groundwater has been found in some blocks closer to Etah district. Health: Vector borne mostly water borne diseases are prevalent in the rural areas. There is no centralized plant for water treatment in the district. A new sewage treatment plant has been commissioned under UDISSMT and is likely to be ready in the next 1-2 years. This plant will cover almost 80% of the population. Irrigation dept: The Gram Panchayats can use MGNREGS funds to clean gullies (a local term for conduits connecting the distributaries to the field) and minors. Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Dept: The most prevalent breeds of buffalo is ‘murrah’ and that of cow is ‘jersey’. The Artificial Insemination (AI) programme has been helpful in improving the breed. The milk production has increased almost 10% - 15% in the last 5 yrs. Landless and marginal farmers depend on cattle for their survival. There is enough availability of fodder in the district. Despite high production of milk in the district, its marketing has been an issue. The Paras Co-operative Dairy Federation (PCDF) has been closed which has adversely affected milk marketing. There has been lack of Veterinary. Personnel in some parts of the district due to connectivity issue. A helpline service at the state level in the name Jan Suchna Kendra has been set up. The complaints lodged by villagers are sent via SMS to the veterinary Services at the district level and subsequent actions are taken by informing the personnel at the field level. There is plenty of water and fodder availability in the district because of the canal system. Other observations:  Connecting fisheries with irrigation department is of paramount importance.  Intensification and diversification – both are the focus of all concerned line departments especially agriculture and allied.  Over exploitation of water and excessive use of chemical fertilizer, are the major issues in the district.  Massive plantations along canal bunds should be carried out. 3.3.4 Findings of Focussed Group Discussion in District Fatehpur The meeting held on 07.09.2012 was attended by 19 senior officials of deferent departments including C.D.O., Irrigation, Drainage, Veterinary, Labour, Horticulture, Ground Water, Forest, Fisheries, Agriculture and Jal Nigam. The discussion yielded the following information about the conditions in the District: Agriculture: Net sown area 2.30 Lakh hectare Area sown in Kharif 1.37 Lakh hectare. Area sown in Rabi 2.30 Lakh hectare. Area sown in Zaid 0.15 Lakh hectare. 144  Main crops in Rabi are Wheat, Gram and Mustard and the Kharif paddy, Jowar and Arhar.  Productivity of wheat was 33 Qtl./Ha.and that of Rice 24 Qtl./ Ha.(Paddy 36 Qtl/Ha)  Crop Diversification: Banana and chillies are now popular and tissue cultured Banana are available to farmers. There was a demand for establishing Tissue culture Lab in the district.  In case canal water is supplied adequately and timely there was possibility to increase sown area of paddy by about 10,000 Ha.  In case of timely availability of canal water, productivity of wheat and paddy may increase by 3 to 4 Qtl/Ha.  HYV seeds were available to farmers and about 25% of seeds used were hybrid. The procurement centres does not purchase hybrid paddy.  Horticulture: Area under fruit trees including Mango, Lemon, Guvava and Amla is 9837 Ha. Area under them is increasing by 40-50 Ha per year while under Banana is about 50 Ha.  Area under spices such as Chillies, Coriander and Turmeric is 1550 ha.  Horticultural produce is normally purchased by middleman and sold by them in mandi where they earn huge margin of profit.  National horticulture mission is not working in the district.  Irrigation: Canal length is 1409.19 Km.  417 Government Tubewell are in working condition against 667. Thus 250 Tubewell were non functional, either failed or due to depleting water level giving sand or became defunct. Average ground water table is about 40 Mtr. Though in some areas it is between 22 and 27 meters. Net irrigated to net sown area 65% Through Private Tubewells 72% Through canal 22% Through Govt. Tubewells 03%  About one- third of the sown area is rainfed.  Canal work on roster basis but timely water is sometime not available to farmers.  Canal water does not reach Tail end in Block Khaga.  Desilting of canal is done once a year.  Cases of canal cutting and Blocking are large, particularly during Kharif, but have not been reported.  Canal operating efficiency in Rabi was reportedly 35% and in Kharif 30%.  Outlet were mostly tampered.  WUAs were not formed in the district.  About 70% of water charges were collected.  Availability of Agricultural labour: Agricultural labour is available but their wages have increased significantly due to their employment under MNREGA. 145  Health: Common water borne diseases in the district were: Diarrhoea, cholera, Viral fever, gastro- enteritis. While vector borne disease include Filarial, Fluorosis (in Bhitora Block).  Source of drinking water is India Mark-II handpumps and tubewells.  There is no drainage system and water logging is common problem.  There were: 6 CHC, 11 PHC, 2 Hospital, 72 sub-centres and 42 dispensaries in the district. All sub centres work as family welfare centres. This facility is also available at CHCs and PHCs.  Animal husbandry: the district has 35 Veterinary Hospitals and 52 AI centres.  Average daily production of milk in the district is 57.36 Qtl. and there are 14 small milk chilling centres but the sale of milk is mostly local and cheap.  Only about 20% of the required green fodder is available.  As per BPL survey 2002, 38.21% of rural families were living below poverty line. 3.3.5 Findings of Focussed Group Discussions in District Kaushambi The meeting held on 08-09-2012 was attended by seven senior officials of different departments including Animal husbandary, Horticulture, Irrigation, Ground Water, Health, Forest and Agriculture. The discussion yielded the following information about the conditions in the district:  Agriculture: Net sown Area : 1.34 Lakh ha Area sown in Kharif : 0.91 Lakh ha Area sown in Rabi : 1.34 Lakh ha  Main crops in Rabi are wheat, gram and in Kharif Paddy, Jowar and Arhar.  Productivity of wheat was 28 Qtl/Ha, Gram 15 Qtl/Ha and that of Rice 22 Qtl/Ha.  Area under wheat was about 91000 Ha, under Paddy about 57000 Ha and under Gram about 13000 Ha.  If canal water is supplied timely and adequately there is a possibility of an increase in sown area of Paddy by about 25000 Ha.  The productivity of wheat and paddy may increase by about 3 to 4 Qtl/Ha if canal water is available timely.  Horticulture: Area under Banana : 1922 Ha Area under Guvava : 800 Ha Area under Lemon : 200 Ha Area under Spices : 17470 Ha (mainly chillies and garlic particularly in Block Newada and Kaushambi)  Due to poor rains and depleting ground water table (going down by 20 to 25 centimetres per year) many tubewells become ineffective. Many farmers engaged in horticulture are adopting drip irrigation and sprinkler system for which marginal farmers are getting 60% while others were getting 50% subsidy from the government. 146  Under Drip irrigation and Sprinkler system it was claimed that water is saved by about 50%, growth of plants is better and produce of fruits is also better.  Mostly educated farmers were ignoring traditional crops and shifting to orchards/ horticulture as they require less labour (due to MNREGA farmers were not getting labour during crop season.)  The horticultural crops are more profitable. The production of Banana is approximately 60,000 Kg per Ha and they get price between Rs. 7/- and Rs. 15/- per kg (Average Rs. 10/- per kg) while the production of Guvava is about 12000 kg per ha for which they receive an average price @ Rs. 8/- per kg.  Irrigation: Canal Length (Kishanpur Pump Canal) : 264.88 Km Government Tubewell : 268 Private Tubewells (including Pumpsets) : 18126  Net irrigated to net sown area : 70%  Area irrigated through: Canal : 20.1% Public Tubewells : 3.7 % Private Tubewells : 76.2%  Since Kishanpur is a pump canal timely and adequate supply of water depend on power supply.  Out of 35 Tail minors, water in 9 minors was not reaching.  Shortage of power is a serious problem due to which out of 420 cusec only about 200 cusec water is generally available in canal. Out of 7 pumps only 3 to 5 pumps work for about 8 hours per day.  Fatehpur canal which also serve some part of the district has 25 minors and in 19 of them water was not reaching at tail end.  Desilting of canal is done before Rabi and Kharif (November and June)  Cases of canal cutting/blocking are common. Tawan (Penalty) was charged from two groups of farmers and 6 cases under canal Act were filed for Blocking in the last one year.  Canal operating efficiency was approximately 50%.  There was no problem of seepage in canal.  Condition of outlets was reported as satisfactory.  Roaster system was in practice  WUAs have not been formed  Irrigation department is able to collect 100% charges.  There is no problem of water logging and floods in the district.  Health: Diarrhoea, Viral fever and gastro-entritis are common water borne diseases and Filaria and Malaria are vector borne diseases in the district.  For drinking water local as well as India mark-II handpumps, Tubewells and wells are used.  No proper drainage system exist in rural areas.  Forest cover was nominal in the district i.e. about 700 Ha. 147  Animal Husbandry: There were 15 veterinary hospitals and 24 Artificial Inseminates (AI Centers (Only 6 working while remaining without staff)  About 1.10 lakh Milch Cattle in the district produce an average of about 4 liter per day/ cattle.  Out of an average production of 4.40 lakh litre milk per day, procurement by milk plants was about 2.56 lakh and the rest was sold locally.  Only about 10% of cattle are of cross breed thus more quality breed is required to improve milk production.  There are 3 chilling plants in the district.  Fodder seed distribution program has been taken up by Government  Galghotu, mouth and foot disease, wooden tong and lumpy jaw diseases are commonly found among livestock.  Awareness about conjunctive use of water among farmers is lacking.  Only Block Sarsawa and Kara have relatively shallow water table (being canal command area) rest of the areas have deep water table, going down by 20 to 25 centimeters per year. 3.3.6 Findings of Focussed Group discussion in district-Kanpur Nagar The meeting held on 10-09-2012 was attended by 9 Senior officials of different departments including Agriculture, Irrigation, Forest, Fishereis, Jal Nigam, Tubewell, Horticulture and Ground water. The discussion yielded the following information about condition in the district:  Agriculture: Net Sown Area : 1.99 Lakh Ha Net Sown Area in Kharif : 1.70 Lakh Ha Net Sown Area in Rabi : 1.76 Lakh Ha Net Sown Area in Zaid : 0.30 Lakh Ha  Productivity of Wheat : 34.80 Qtl./Ha Rice : 27.08 Qtl./Ha  No significant diversification of crops is reported.  In case canal water is supplied adequately and timely, there is a a possibility of an increase of 10% in sown area and 5% in productivity of crops.  Horticulture: Area under fruit trees such as Mango and Guvava is about 800 Ha.  Guvava saplings for 20 Ha area have been distributed by the department last year.  Area under spices including chillies and garlic is about 160 Ha.  There is no problem in marketing of the horticulture produce.  There is one Fruit processing unit in the district which process the produce and also impart training in processing.  Irrigation: Canal Length : 1000.19 Km. CCA Kharif : 143498 Ha CCA Rabi : 143498 Ha 148 PPA Kharif : 59552 Ha(41.5%) PPA Rabi : 51660 Ha (36.0%) Govt. Tubewells : 334 (50 Acre Command Area per TW) Private Tubewells : 44470 (including Pumpsets)  Canal water available as per roaster.  Incidence of Canal cutting/blocking were reportedly 50 in a year. For which Tawan (penalty) is recovered in some cases while in other, cases are filed through Deputy Revenue Officer.  Desilting of Canal is done once in a year, before Rabi.  About 50% of outlets were reportedly damaged.  Canal irrigation charges were Rs. 287/- per Ha in Rabi and Kharif both.  WUAs have not been formed in the district, list of farmers was being prepared for voters list.  100% irrigation charges are collected through Tehsil Staff.  Health: Source of drinking water in rural areas is mostly India Mark-II handpumps and in towns and city is piped water.  Sanitary conditions in villages are not satisfactory as people generally throw garbage in pits near their home and drains are either damaged or remain unclean and choked.  Testing of drinking water quality is done at the time of boring for handpumps.  Average ground water level in the district is about 20 mtr. Tehsil Bilhaur has 9 mtr while Tehsil Kanpur has 25 mtr deep water table.  Forest: The district has a total of 5378.255 Ha forest area i.e. about 1.5% of total area of the district. It include 300 Ha reserved forest and 3000 Ha along Ganges in Bilhaur Tahsil.  There were 941 ponds covering 633 Ha area.  The production of fish was about 7651 Qtl/year and average productivity was 35 Qtl/Ha.  About half of the rural household in the district (49.08%) were living below poverty line, as per BPL Census 2002. 3.3.7 Findings of Focussed Group discussion in Kannauj district Agriculture: The southern part of the district is well catered by the irrigation system whereas there is no such system in the northern part. This results in the major part of the district using tube wells/bore wells for irrigation. There used to be a substantial cultivation of sunflower in the district which got ultimately erased due to lack of irrigation and marketing facilities. It was replaced by maize which is equally water demanding and requires 8-9 waterings. However, with improved irrigation and power supply, farmers in certain parts of the district have started growing sunflower. However, the marketing infrastructure still need to be improved. 149 There is considerably poor awareness amongst farmers regarding the varying quantity of irrigation for varying crops. The agriculture department has conducted a lot of goshtis at the Panchayat level to educate farmers on crop specific watering and management of water and there has been some amount of awareness although a lot more need to happen. The soil quality has deteriorated and there is no nitrogen fixation. Excessive use of chemical fertilizers and poor subsidy for organic manure has only helped in the rampant use of the former for increasing production thus leading to poor soil quality. However, off late some farmers have started using nitrogen fixing crops as part of crop rotation and is carrying on with the practice out of their own interest. The agriculture extension work mostly involves demonstration of improved varieties at the farmer’s level. There is almost no use of indigenous varieties of crops and farmers big and small have taken extensively to growing hybrid varieties. Jal Nigam (water supply): The groundwater table in the canal fed areas are quite satisfactory whereas in the remaining parts of the district, its quite at an alarming level due to excessive overdrawing for irrigation. The Kannauj and Jalalabad blocks are in the dark zone where the water table is alarmingly low. There is a water quality testing lab in the district operational since 2003-04. However Gram Panchayats have also been provided with water testing kits and have been trained to use them to test the quality of water from time to time. Till date no GPs have reported a single sample of water to the department. There are around 13392 sources of India Mark II hand pumps and tubewells across the district. Most parts of the district are catered to by the piped water supply scheme through deep tubewells. The department had implemented a few water conservations schemes like construction of soak pits etc. but was not able to continue the same due to paucity of funds. Also the terrain across the district is plain which does not provide much scope of water harvesting/water conservation works like stop dams etc. except farm ponds, irrigation channels etc. Convergence with MGNREGA is not possible for undertaking water conservation works as under the scheme the material labour ratio is 60:40 whereas the norms of the department is 80:20. Irrigation: Uncontrolled distribution of water is the major problem in the district despite of its enough availability at present. Issues like rampant breach of canal by farmers, installing illegal conduits etc. results in the water not reaching the tail end. Even if the water reaches, it starts flowing in the reverse direction. Increasing tail end as suggested by farmers is not possible. Almost 80% of irrigation across the district is through tubewells/bore wells. There is a lot of wastage of water. Reclamation of land has resulted in increase of net sown area which implies more demand for irrigation against the existing infrastructure. Every year there is an increase of 10% of reclaimed land and such land cannot be left idle which means irrigation has to be ensured round the year. Also an average of 3-4 crops a year is taken across the district which leads to more demand. All this implies expansion of the existing infrastructure/new systems to cater to the increasing demand. The Irrigation division in the district has been formed only 11 months back and the officials are in the process of organizing the system. There have been orientation about 150 the existing condition and the department is also not adequately staffed. There is hardly instances of water logging along the canal side as is the case in other districts. Fisheries: Tank irrigation is possible in some areas wherein the irrigation channel can help fill farm ponds to promote fisheries. Common problems affecting pisciculture are – siltation and reduction of water holding area. The department caters to the poor by arranging land for them on lease, facilitating bank loans etc. However, poor response of banks towards providing loans and water availability for just 5-6 months has affected pisciculture across the district. Immediate attention is required not only by the fisheries department but by other departments as well to promote fisheries as a viable occupation for the landless and the poor and hence guarantee a source of livelihood. Horticulture: Drip irrigation can be very useful for potato cultivation keeping in mind the substantial production in the district. The system can save water up to 80%. Sprinkler sets have been distributed and there have been success. However the ample water available for irrigation through tubewells/bore wells and canals do not allow farmers to consider alternative water saving and energy efficient systems of irrigation. Further there have not been enough subsidies for drip and sprinkler irrigation systems which is another reason why farmers do not get inclined towards using it. Animal Husbandry: Cattle rearing has been in good shape and the supporting factor has been marketing of milk through co-operatives – Government as well as private in the district. However there is no milk processing unit in the district and setting up of one would help in increasing the income of the cattle rearing family. Milk production has not increased substantially due to lack of adequate fodder. The district has to import fodder from other districts. Subsidies for fodder seeds to families having cattle should be provided. A total of 2000 ha of land is under fodder and grassland in the district. Trainings have been organized by the Department for the families rearing cattle on various ways of protection and prevention from diseases. Poor recovery of loans discourages banks from providing further loans to poor families for purchasing hybrid varieties. Common observations: Overall productivity is constant but production has increased. As an effect of MGNREGS, agricultural labour has drifted from agricultural work to non- agricultural work which has also affected agricultural production. To counter this extensive mechanization of agriculture has happened. The canal is run as per roaster. Hence if water is provided for 15days to the farmers and then the remaining 15 days for filling up of the ponds then water use efficiency and a proper management regime can be followed. However, this does not happen as farmers stake their claim over the water which is meant to fill up the pond and hence adequate water supply to irrigate the ponds cannot take place. There is a need to regulate number of ponds which can be catered to by the irrigation canals. In the case of excessive number of ponds, justice cannot be done to all of them especially in peak irrigation demand season. The damage to standing crops by Nilgai is 151 very common in the district. They causes heavy damage to the crops. Since they are regarded as a cow by the local population therefore they cannot be killed or culled and hence the menace caused by them becomes uncontrollable. In UP land registration never used to be in the name of woman although they use to do the maximum work on the field. The situation has changed and registration in the name of woman has become concessional. In all programmes, at least 30% participation of women is ensured. All departments like agriculture, horticulture etc. coordinate and collaborate with the Panchayat level officials and office bearers in implementing its programme. There has however been no exclusive training for the krishi (agriculture) samiti (committee) of the Gram Panchayat on issues related to agriculture and irrigation so far. They are involved / invited in training programmes / workshops / discussions organize by the departments for the farmers. Twice a year Goshtis are organized at the Nyaya Panchayat level wherein all line departments participate and popularize/disseminate information about various issues related to agriculture, horticulture, animal husbandry, fisheries etc. Agriculture and allied departments do not have adequate personnel to regularly implement and monitor their programmes at the ground level – block and GP level. Adding to this, too many schemes and programmes of the Central and State Government causes confusion and additional pressure at the implementation level thus affecting quality. 3.3.8 Findings of Focused Group discussion in district Kanpur Dehat The meeting held on 11-09-2012 was attended by 14 Senior officials of different departments including Agriculture, DRDA, PWD, Horticulture, Panchayat, Zila Parishad, Irrigation, Animal Husbandry, Health and Rural Development and the Chief Development Officer. The discussion yielded the following information about condition in the district:  Agriculture: Net Sown Area : 2.91 Lakh Ha Net Sown Area in Rabi : 1.83 Lakh Ha Net Sown Area in Kharif : 1.06 Lakh Ha Net Sown Area in Zaid : 0.03 Lakh Ha  Productivity of Wheat : 34.59 Qtl./Ha Rice : 23.21 Qtl./Ha  Due to very high increase in price of DAP farmers were now using more urea.  Earlier, Paddy was main crop in the district but due to non availability of canal water in Tail minors, it has become insignificant.  Due to serious decline in paddy crop, 12 rice mills in Pukhraiyan and Rasoolabad have closed.  Rasoolabad Tehsil has large part of usar land.  Serious Power crisis result in Tubewells not working to their capacity.  In case canal water is supplied adequately and timely, it is expected that sown area productivity for wheat & rice may increase by about 15% and 10% respectively. 152  Due to shortage of canal water many farmers were shifting to pulses- Arhar, Moong and urad.  Many farmers were also shifting to Ash Gourd (Petha) as it gives high return.  Horticulture: Area under fruit (Guvava) trees was about 300 Ha and under spices such as chillies and Corriander about 50 Ha . There is no marketing problem for the produce.  Irrigation Canal Length CCA PCA Kharif PCA Rabi ID Nabipur 336 Km. 53571 Ha 36% 41.5% ID Dibyapur 122 Km. 20000 Ha 36% 41.5% LGC 74.50 Km. Bhognipur Div 35.66 Km.  Public tubewells 255 Private Tubewells (Including Pumpsets) 45941  Blocks with Deep Ground Water Level (60-95 ft) are Amordha, Malasa, Rajpur, Derapur and Sandalpur.  Blocks with Medium Strata (20-60 ft) are Akbarpur, Jhinjhak, Rasulabad, Maitha and Sarban Khera.  Canal Water supply was neither adequate nor timely.  In at least 10% of tail end minors water was not reaching.  Desilting of canal was done every year during November-December.  Large Number of incidences of Canal cutting/Blocking are reported. Last year 30 cases were filed and in 8 cases FIR were lodged with the police in Nabipur Khand. Tawan (penalty) amounting to Rs. 275000/- was recovered in 32 cases.  Condition of outlets was reportedly poor/damaged.  Roaster system exist but actually supply depend on availability of water in canal.  WUAs does not exist, voters list under preparation.  100% water charges are collected through Tehsil.  In 2011 Kisan Credit Cards to 31000 farmers were distributed.  Employment & Migration: Farmers were facing problem in getting labour for agriculture work, wages for agricultural labour have increased due to migration of workers to Gujrat and Delhi and employment under MNREGA.  Works undertaken under MNREGA include: laying Kharanja, Forestation, Canal maintenance, Link roads, Land development and Farm land levelling etc.  Payment under MNREGA is done through Gram Sabha and there is generally delay in payment to labour.  Health: Source of drinking water is generally local and India Mark-II handpumps. Handpumps of 30-40 feet deep boring have generally polluted water.  Drainage and sanitary conditions in villages are generally poor.  The district has 12 CHCs, 31 PHCs and the district hospital. Maternal and Child Welfare Centres also exist at these places. 153  Significant disease among people include: Floursis (particularly in Block Rajpur and Amraudha) Iodine deficiency, Anaemia and Worm related. About 8-10 cases per month are found HIV positive.  There is no TB Clinic but 19 TB centres and 4 TB units were working.  All public schools have India Mark-II handpumps and toilets.  Health Check-up of students is conducted annually in all public schools and Iron and de-worming tablets are distributed.  Forest and Wetlands/Ponds: There is no reserved forest. Plantation at Roadside and Gram Sabha land under social forestry has been done.  The district has about 1800 ponds but fish production was insignificant.  Animal Husbandry: There were 24 Veternary Hospitals and 70 AI Centres.  Quality of Milch Cattle is average graded.  There is no shortage of fodder for animals.  Common disease in livestock is Worm infestation.  The number of educational institutions for girls at different level were few as against for boys, e.g. Out 127 High Schools only 6 are for girls; Out of 126 Intermediate colleges 13 are for girls and Out of 52 Degree colleges only 2 for girls.  As per BPL Census 2002, about 63% of Rural household were living below poverty line.  There were no WUAs in the district. 3.3.9 Focussed Group discussion in district Farrukhabad Irrigation: The canal network is around 140 km which is highly insufficient compared to the demand. Canal and Kulaba breaching is also a phenomenon in places where water is available. The water hardly reaches the tail end and hence there is every need to increase the amount of water supply for irrigation along with improving the infrastructure. Since there is very little water, there is hardly any instance of water logging in the district. Most of the irrigation needs are catered to by the private tubewells/bore wells. The excess of paddy cultivation in the district is also a reason for higher demand of irrigation water which is resulting in overdrawing of groundwater in the absence of an elaborate canal system. Construction of cattle ghats to prevent damages, lining of canals and remodeling are of utmost importance in the district. The incidence of flood is only when water from upstream is released from dams and barrages. It is not due to rains as is the common perception as the amount of rainfall has decreased in the district. The flood water can be diverted through canals which are not currently happening and hence the drainage system needs to be rejuvenated. There have been no measures taken by the district to check siltation. Neither have there been any structures installed in this regard. The irrigation department has been involved in orienting / educating farmers 1-2 times on irrigation systems, water use and management using CDs and DVDs. However there have been no such efforts off late by the department. ‘Sinchai Mitra’ – Friends of Irrigation is an initiative by the district administration wherein monthly meetings are held with the irrigation, agriculture and other allied departments and is chaired by the Chairman of the Zila Panchayat. Such meetings which 154 used to yield good results and most importantly ensure inter-departmental coordination are no longer a feature since quite some time. The Jiledars of the Irrigation department holds monthly meetings with farmers on the 25th of every month to sort out irrigation related issues. There is hardly any information / knowledge about the canal roster system amongst villagers. They are not aware as to when do the canal run and the right time to irrigate their fields. Hence, there is an increased dependence on tubewells. The department should broadcast the roster schedule regularly through local television and newspaper so as to inform the farmers about the availability of water. Average power availability is around 8 hrs in rural areas. Jal Nigam: The department is currently setting up a system of water supply in the district following which sewage treatment will be taken up. The amount of water required for sewage is 135 LPCD. The average water table in the district is at 8 – 10 metres except in two blocks which are in the grey zone and the water table has fallen to 30 metres. There are a total of 26 piped water supply systems across the district which is majorly catering to the rural areas. Rest of the areas not covered under piped water supply is catered by tubewells. As regards water quality, only one block has excess of iron content. Water quality testing facility is available in the district. Agriculture: Potato, maize and groundnut are major crops grown in the district. Sunflower used to be a major crop but is no longer grown due to water scarcity and lack of marketing facilities. Sprinkler systems were distributed to the farmers but they remove the sprinkler and use the pipes to flood the fields. There is a district level helpline that operates and provides farmers with the required assistance / information. However it is seldom used as there is not much awareness about the same amongst farmers. There is no knowledge amongst the dealers of seeds, fertilizers and pesticides on the right kind of seeds and fertilizer use. This results in farmers getting misdirected and compelled to use whatever is being sold by the dealers. Proper education of dealers is a must along with those of the farmers so that the right kind of inputs can be used. Women are sent for training conducted by KVKs and the agriculture department on certain issues but there are hardly any programme / scheme to promote women’s role in agriculture. Since potato is grown in large numbers their storage in cold chains becomes an issue due to limited capacity and hence farmers do not get proper price for their produce despite of ending up paying high rents for using the cold storage. This calls for semi-processing and processing units for potato and proper marketing facilities which will fetch them better incomes for e.g.: chips manufacturing unit in the district. Cash crops like sugarcane can be grown where the canal system is catering but there is dependence on tubewells for growing vegetables. An NGO a few years back initiated Aloe vera cultivation amongst the farmers and provided them inputs. However they failed to guarantee buy back and hence the venture flopped. 155 Forest: There is only 1000 ha of forest land in the district. Canal side plantation has not been initiated in a big way due to lack of plantation patches. Sesame has been grown at some places and was successful but is now fast dying owing to fungus infection. There are only temporary wetlands in the district. Health: No such incidence of water borne diseases in the district except sporadic ones which are controlled through timely interventions. Vector borne diseases which are currently low can increase owing to expansion in irrigation if problems like water logging are not handled simultaneously. Institutional delivery is low in the district despite of schemes and efforts due to low levels of literacy and traditional beliefs. Animal Husbandry: An extensive canal system would have led to more fodder availability thus leading to better livestock rearing and improved livelihoods. However, the current situation is not very encouraging although people do maintain cattle other than agriculture. The milk production in the district is satisfactory but marketing facilities need to be improved. The department does conduct camps and contact programmes with the villagers educating them on proper upkeep / maintenance of the cattle but very infrequently due to lack of staff and logistics with the department. Activities like immunization etc. cannot be carried out at regular intervals due to the bottlenecks. Para-vets are not very active in carrying out their responsibilities as they consider themselves to be veterinary doctors after getting trained. There is no mechanism to force them to do their duties. Fisheries: There are no Private or Government hatcheries in the district. The situation currently is dull but there is a lot of scope for improvement in the district provided line departments co-operate, financial institutions extend their support and marketing facilities are created. MGNREGS can be used for the construction of ponds and also support to plantation and bore well thus improving pisciculture. Small rivers / rivulets can be tamed for pisciculture. There is no deficiency of fodder for the cattle in the district due to year round availability of maize, sugarcane etc. Common observations: The Net Sown Area has increased considerably which implies that the fields are covered with one or the other crop in most parts of the year. This has also necessitated more water for irrigation. There is a need in developing and promoting IEC activities under agriculture and irrigation activities especially at the Nyaya and Block Panchayat level. The Village Water and Sanitation committees of the Gram Panchayat can be used to disseminate information regarding water use and efficiency, cropping patterns, irrigation systems etc. 156 Adequate and frequent hand holding of irrigation and agriculture department staff and personnel is of utmost importance for them to be abreast of developments in agriculture and allied issues across the district. NGOs are required at the block level which would engage with the farming community on a regular basis and would orient them on issues related to cropping pattern, water use efficiency, conflict resolution, higher productivity with minimum inputs, preserving soils nutrients, developing other allied activities like horticulture, fisheries, animal husbandry etc. There is a need for convergence amongst the forest and animal husbandry departments on castrating the male Nilgai to stop further reproduction. Fast multiplication of Nilgai and reduced grasslands causes damages to standing crops. Funds need to be provided by the Forest department to the Animal Husbandry department to carry out the operation. Waste water need to be treated and used for irrigation instead of letting it out to the rivers or other water bodies. This will help avert health related problems as well as solve the issue of inadequate water availability for irrigation at least in certain regions. 3.3.10 Findings of Focussed Group discussion in district Auraiya The meeting held on 12-09-2012 chaired by Mr. Lalmani, officiating District Magistrate was attended by 24 Senior Officials of different departments including Agriculture, Irrigation, Rural Engineering, Health, Jal Nigam, Social Welfare, Forest, Tubewell, DRDA, CDO and Rural Development. The discussion yielded the following information about the conditions in the district:  Some Serious problems: i) Serious problem of drainage, water logging and seepage in Block Achhalda and Bidhuna. ii) Seepage in Etawah Branch canal leading to Sodicity, Salinity and sandy soil. iii) Sodicity has affected the entire district. iv) Rugged land in Block Auraiya and Ajitmal. v) Wild animals damaging crops seriously in block Ajitmal.  Agriculture: Net Sown Area in Rabi -Wheat : 100625 Ha Net Sown Area in Kharif-Paddy : 50179 Ha Net Sown Area in Zaid-Moong : 5000 Ha  Productivity of Wheat : 37.51 Qtl./Ha Paddy : 26.24 Qtl./Ha Moong : 4.90 Qtl/Ha  Crop Diversification: Crop area under Maize increased from 9075 Ha 5 years back to 16154 Ha at present. 157  HYV seeds are used in all Kharif, Rabi and Zaid crops due to which income improved particularly in Paddy and Maize.  Possibility of increase in sown area if canal water is supplied timely and adequately: Wheat by 5000 Ha, Paddy 4000 Ha, Maize 4000 Ha, Moong 3000 Ha and Sugarcane by 5000 Ha.  Increase in productivity is possible if adequate and timely canal water is supplied: Wheat by 4 Qtl/Ha, Paddy 3 Qtl/Ha, Maize 5 Qtl/Ha and Sugarcane by 5.5 Qtl/Ha.  Horticulture: Area under fruit trees 9870 Ha (Mango, Guvava) under spices 885 Ha (Garlic and Chillies).  Market price of Garlic is between Rs. 800/- and Rs. 1200/- per quintal which is very low and, therefore need minimum support price.  Irrigation: Canal Length : 818.798 Km Public Tubewells : 308 Private Tubewells : 30000 (Including Pumpsets)  Net irrigated to net sown area - 92%  Source wise irrigation Canal : 37.15% Public Tubewells : 8.7% Private Tubewells : 53.03%  Canal water in 4 Tail end minors with command area of about 400 Ha is not reaching.  Problems preventing canal water from reaching tail end include: indisciplined farmers, illegal outlets and absence of Osrabandi.  Desilting of Canal is done twice a year, during April-June and October-November.  About 60 cases per year of canal cutting / blocking were recorded.  For canal cutting/Blocking Tawan (penalty) of Rs. 3.5 Lakh was collected last year and 6 cases were filed under canal Act.  Canal seepage has affected about 1490 Ha area.  Condition of outlets not satisfactory as most of them are damaged.  Roaster system for canal water was in operation.  WUAs does not exist.  Water charges are collected through Tehsil. Though collections were 100% but mostly delayed.  Marketing of Produce: Farmers face problems as there is only one mandi in Auraiya proper which is incapable to meet demand of farmers. Thus, most of the produce is sold locally or through middlemen.  Out of the proposed 38886 only 11771 Kisan Credit Cards were issued this year.  Employment and Migration: There is no shortage of agriculture labour as there is no problem of migration. Labour is also available for MNREGA works.  Health: Common water borne diseases include: acute diarrhoeal disease, Bacillary dysentery, Viral hepatitis A and C and Typhoid. Vector borne diseases include: 158 Malaria, Dengae, Chikanguniya and Filaria. High incidence of both type of diseases in Block Achhalda and Sahar.  Sources of drinking water were local handpumps, well and India Mark-II handpumps.  The district has 5 CHC, 26 PHC, 157 sub-Centre, 22 Ayurvedic and Unani hospitals and 7 Homeopathic hospitals.  Animal Husbandry: There were 14 Veternary hospitals, 25 AI Centres under Animal husbandry department and 16 under BAIF.  The quality of milch cattle is medium graded.  Average production of milk the district is 250000 litres/day which is sold locally. There is no milk processing industry.  Only about 20% of the required fodder was available.  Common diseases related to livestocks were Parasite infection, Tick Born disease, Sporadic Bocterial and urinary infection.  Forest and Wetlands: Area under forest in the district was 100.1 Km (10000 Ha).  Area under wetlands is 1200 Ha. Its area is reducing due to encroachment by people.  Self Help Groups: A total of 5208 SHGs were formed till August 2012. Out of them 250 were inactive. The number of women SHGs was 1533. A total of 2014 SHGs including 42 women SHGs were engaged in income generating activities.  Block Ajitmal and Auraiya have deep ground water strata of over 50 feet where more public Tubewells were needed.  About 45% of rural families were living below poverty line as per BPL census 2002. 3.3.11 Findings of Focussed Group discussion in district Etawah Irrigation: Adequate availability of water for irrigation in canals can be of benefit to activities of other departments like drinking water and sanitation etc. Canal water is available at very cheaper rates as against water from tubewells / bore wells. However, canal water has reduced and there is no provisions for distribute water equitably. Further there is lot of wastage especially in Kharif crops. If the water is conserved and wastage can be controlled, more area can be brought under irrigation. The department has not conducted any training or orientation for farmers on effective water use as per crops. There is a need for construction of minors and ‘gullies’ to convey the water to the fields which is not happening today. The reason behind breaching of canals are man-made, animal and nature created. Most of the time it is man-made. The irrigation structures have become very old and calls for maintenance and modernization with new equipments. Participatory irrigation will be best understood with the formation of WUAs as per the PIM Act will be constituted soon. The restructuring project will be sustainable only when modernization/automation will happen in the case of construction of new canal systems, maintenance and rehabilitation and in arresting breaches of the canal structure. The Sinchai Bandhu initiative is running well in the district. Minor irrigation: Nearly 56% of irrigation in the district is with the help of groundwater. 159 Shallow, medium and deep tubewells have been installed for the purpose. However, shallow tubewells have failed and farmers prefer medium and deep tube well. Aquifer mapping should be done to determine the depth of boring and inform villagers on the exact state of groundwater in the region so as to help them in deciding the use. Agriculture: Training/workshops/goshtis at block and Nyaya Panchayat level are conducted. The Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVKs) disseminates information on better and improved varieties and also on crop specific water requirement. Sprinkler sets and pipes have been distributed around 5-7 years back. However farmers in canal served areas hardly use sprinkler sets for irrigation. There have been three times more productivity due to the use of sprinkler sets and even more productivity because of drip irrigation sets. However the successful use of the sprinkler and drip sets has been possible only in two blocks. Excessive water logging has given rise to wastelands and ravines. Salt tolerant species need to be introduced in the wastelands. Audio-visual means like documentary films have worked well in disseminating information to the farmers on agriculture and allied areas. There have been exposure visits for farmers to expose them to good practices in agriculture and pisciculture. Disseminating information with the help of sms has also been very popular off late because of the availability of mobile with most farmers. Fisheries: Farm ponds are filled by canals in the month of May and June. However, water availability should be increased to make pisciculture more viable in the district. There was an effort by the department to distribute the land leases to women but none of them had land registered in their name. Marketing facilities should be created to boost production and contribute towards sustainability of the venture. There are no hatcheries in the district except a fish farm for seed production. As of now only 100-150 families in the district are engaged in pisciculture. Huge lack of staff is affecting the performance of the department. Horticulture: Potato and garlic are grown as major crops. Very few horticultural crops can be grown along the canal side due to water-logging. Some programmes/schemes for training women in fruit preservation can be started as a skill and value addition initiative in the district. Forests: Excessive seepage from canals is hindering the process of plantation. The sides of canals should be clearly demarcated on both sides so that the land is not encroached by farmers and plantation can be taken up on a large scale. There are over 17000 ha of forests in the district out of which around 420 ha is along the canal system and 13000 ha of land is ravenous in the district. Soil and Water Conservation: Drainage development has helped in reclamation of land wherein the fallow cover has reduced from 25000 ha to 20000 ha. Jal Nigam: The source of drinking water across the district is mainly ground water. However, surface source development will reduce cost and will check indiscriminate use 160 of ground water. Hand pumps are not a permanent source of water supply. However, the current situation indicates that not only human but even cattle has to depend on hand pump for its drinking water requirement. Maintenance of hand pumps have been entrusted to the Gram Sabhas. 90% - 95% diseases are related to bad water supply. In the urban area, there is no such activity related to drainage. Hand pumps have been installed in around 620 schools across the district. Health: During the water logging season incidence of malaria increases whereas there are more cases of diarrhea at the time when the water recedes. Common observations: Water logging is not due to seepage but because of poor drainage systems which does not allow the rain water to flow. Very little participation of women in agricultural activities in the district has been observed due to social restrictions. Even in MRNREGS, there is only 7% participation of women in the workforce. Cattle is another source of damage to the canal banks as they break the sidewalls during their movement to and fro from canal. Despite construction of cattle ghats, Inter-departmental coordination is a common phenomenon in the district. 3.3.12 Findings of Focussed Group discussion in district Mainpuri Irrigation: The entire irrigation infrastructure in the district is around 125 years old and have crossed their life span. There have been no restructuring or remodeling of the existing structures. Farmers do not allow the passage of water through their fields to other fields. All this results in huge wastages. All blocks in the district are covered under canal irrigation. Canal breaching is a serious issue like in other districts. The irrigation department has not conducted any trainings or orientation for the farming community on efficient water use. Despite of a good canal system, use of bore wells still remains rampant across the district. There are two blocks out of nine which falls in the dark zone indicating overexploitation of groundwater. There is ample of waterlogged sites in the district which calls for a comprehensive drainage system. There is acute shortage of staff in the department – almost 50% positions are vacant. The department officials especially those at the field level need to be trained on how to deal with erring farmers and how to cope with issues like political patronage thus making disciplinary action almost impossible. Horticulture: There is heavy soil erosion by the canal side which further reduces the canal life. Plantation of fruit bearing trees will lead to checking soil erosion and increased revenue. Farmers were distributed pipes for flood irrigation on their fields. The canal tube well ratio in the district is approx. 75:25. The major fruits grown are guava, bell, atonal etc. Agriculture: Poor drainage causing excessive water logging has resulted in wasteland formation and hence reclamation has not worked due to successive water logging every year. This calls for an elaborate drainage system only after which the wasteland can be reclaimed. The ATMA scheme for agriculture extension has been implemented in the district as per guidelines. Convincing farmers and marketing have been very difficult 161 which is why innovative agriculture is not possible many a times. Availability of bio- inputs is not always certified following which it cannot be trusted by farmers. Similarly, convincing farmers to use organic manure for agriculture has also not worked well despite demonstration as they all want faster returns. Ground Water and Hydrology: Farmers opt for boring despite ban by the Government on Private and Government bore wells. Fisheries: Farm ponds should be promoted by the Government keeping in view the low level of pisciculture in the district. The department is very poorly staffed with just one official at the district level and having no facilities to reach out to the community. Most of waterlogged areas are on private land and hence the Gram Sabah cannot decide the channeling of the water into ponds. The department extends the benefits of the scheme to families living under BPL, small and marginal farmers, landless etc. Animal Husbandry: Fodder is imported in summer. The major issues affecting cattle rearing are parasitic infections in waterlogged areas and lack of clean drinking water. Forest: There is around 1400 ha of reserved forest land in the district. Farmers encroach upon the land immediate to the canal sides thus making it difficult for plantations. Fencing of plantations are a must in order to ensure its life and protect it from animals. At least 10 – 30 metres of the bank on either side should be developed to enable plantation by the department. Vilaiti Babool is grown in places on places with pH more than 9. Other plants that are grown along with canal banks as of now is – sesame, jamun, arjun etc. Pollution Control Board: It monitors the quality of river water both at the upstream and downstream. There is only one water polluting industry in the district. Any renovation of canal works should avoid polluting industries. Construction of ponds will definitely help in raising the water table. Common observations: It was suggested that the irrigation department should extend its full support to Fisheries for its promotion in the district. Fisheries department should immediately prepare IEC materials detailing the schemes of the department and should be widely circulated at the district, block and gram panchayat level. Also care needs to be taken to avoid disturbing the migratory bird (mostly saras) nesting areas which are usually around the wetlands. Community interaction with farmers at Village Koson Irrigation and Agriculture: Excess of water is a disadvantage as it does not get drained and some areas do not have gool for directing water to the fields. On the other hand, there are places which do not get water. 30% of the total land area remains inundated for a major part of the year thus rendering it useless for agriculture. It is not possible to grow crops in the entire field area as conveyance of water is a big issue. Minors should be connected which will enable a large area to be irrigated. Agriculture and cattle rearing are 162 interconnected. While women do not work in the open fields they take care of the fodder and other necessities of the cattle. Without the cattle being properly fed and taken care of, it is not possible for them to be used for agriculture. Hence, both men and women contribute in agriculture in their own ways. Villagers are not very confident of the WUA model and that it will resolve all issues related to irrigation. The major reasons being illiteracy and caste and class based division. Maintenance of irrigation structures cannot be taken up under MGNREGS as there is lack of labour due to lesser wages (120 as compared to 150 for on farm rates) and also irregularity in payment. Also there is a restriction on using of machines which further prevents work. Improvement in infrastructure will lead to better use. Traditional agricultural practices has not led to increase in production. Whatever has increased is due to the use of modern inputs and machinery. However with increase in production cost of inputs have also increased many folds which is why the profit margin or net income of farmers have gone down substantially. This has resulted in farming being considered as an unproductive occupation and something to be pursued for a living in the absence of other options. Paddy is grown in the region since the last 30 years. Land reclamation has also increased pressure on the existing irrigation structures which has increased the use of tubewells. This has resulted in the groundwater table going down to 30 ft. Fisheries and sugarcane cultivation have a lot of potential but is not pursued because of lack of marketing facilities. Another reason for pisciculture not being popular is that the majority of the population is vegetarian. Hence the bulk of the produce will have to be sold which calls for storage and marketing facilities. Education: Around 70% - 75% children in and around the village go to Government schools for primary and secondary education. Quality of higher education is not good in the near vicinity which is why either children continue with agriculture as their profession or migrate to nearby cities. The landless or small and marginal farmers do not just depend on agriculture for their income. Children from their families move to cities for employment and thus contributes to the family income. This is not so much in the case of big farmers. Around 20% of girls goes for higher education from the village. Health: There is no health centre in the village and the nearest is around 7-8 kms from the village. A building has been constructed in the name of a sub-health centre but there have been no efforts to make it operational since the last 2-3 years. The villagers are not aware about any ANM or MPW who visits the village. Around 90% of the village population is affected by malaria due to water logging. It was informed that there have hardly been any steps taken by the health or any department to control the menace. People do not remember when was the last disinfection / spraying done in the village. Functioning of the Panchayat: There is no mechanism at the Panchayat level to check the status of education, health or nutrition as there are no Gram Sabha meetings or even monthly meetings of the Gram Panchayat with the line department officials. There is no sharing of information by the Gram Panchayat and the Pradhan is a woman from the SC 163 community. It was informed that the participation and support from the majority affluent ‘thakur’ class is almost negligible. This makes it more difficult for the Panchayat to function and hence this is taken as an excuse for non-performance. People are just aware about the standing committees on paper but do not remember who all the members are as the committees never met them since their formation. Impact on local flora and fauna: There are not many cases of snake bites despite the area being waterlogged as the snake population has reduced drastically owing to high pesticide use in the fields. 3.4.1 Findings of Focussed Group discussion in district Rae Bareli The meeting held on 03.09.2012 was attended by 20 senior officials of different departments including agriculture, Irrigation, Veterinary, Fisheries, Forest, Horticulture, Minor irrigation, Health, Pollution Control Board, Jal Nigam, Tubewell, C.D.O. and DRDA. The discussion yielded the following information about the conditions in the district: Agriculture: About 90% of the farmers in the district are marginal and small. Marginal farmers do not get sufficient quantum of work in off-season. The farmers also face the erratic electricity supply. There is no roaster of electricity supply. Input cost of cultivation is increasing. The cost of seed, fertilizer, labour and implement use is increasing, making farming less remunerative. For example, the cost of DAP has tripled during the past 2 years. There is a change in cropping pattern. The area under Mentha is presently 15000 ha, which is likely to increase to 30000 Ha in 2013. Mentha is irrigated both by canal and TW. Some areas under rice – wheat cropping sequence are being replaced by rice-mustard-mentha (3 crop system). Net sown area in the district is 1.82 lac ha and Gross sown area is 3.22 lac ha. 1.51 lakh ha, in Rabi and 1.21 Lakh ha in Kharif and about 35,000 ha in Zaid. Productivity of rice is 22.5 q/ha (paddy 33.75 q/ha).Productivity of wheat is 28 q/ha. About 6% increase in sown area in Rabi in possible of canal water in supplied adequately and timely and in such condition, about 3- 4% increase in yield in both Rabi and Kharif in expected. Marketing of grains is through procurement centres but all the produce is not purchased by procurement centres. Hence, farmers may have to sell their produce to local tradersar cheaper rate than MSP. MSP is available only for paddy and wheat. Soil testing lab exists in the district. Rs. 7 per soil sample testing charge is for NPK and Rs. 30 for micronutrient analysis. Soil health card has been issued to farmers to help them get fertilizer. Bio fertilizers are also being used by the farmers. Horticulture: Area under banana is 200 ha, which is being increased through government efforts in Horticulture Mission. Chillies in Sataon and Khiro block covers about 250-300 ha. Tomato covers about 200 ha. Among floriculture species, gladiolus and marigold are prominent and cover about 20 ha. Tulsi covers about 60-70 ha. Under National Horticulture Mission, citrus, mango and aonla are also being promoted. Tissue cultured banana are available to farmers. Problem of non-availability of processing facility exists in horticultural crops, especially in tomato and chillies. Marketing facility 164 is local as well as in Kanpur for the farmers engaged in horticultural crops.There is no price regulation and the farmers have to sell their produce at a very cheap rate, eg. Chillies are purchased @ Rs. 3-4 per kg at the farmgate. Similar is the case with hybrid tomato. Processing units need to be established in the district so that the farmers can get a good price of tomato, chillies, etc. There are 14 cold storage facility in the district. Irrigation: Canal length is 1500 km in the districts.TW Government.-273, Private (Electric)-7547, Private (Diesel) pump sets-53425, Medium TWs-2271. Problem in Dalmau Pump Canal command is that it is dependent on electricity (flow is not by gravity). Due to erratic electricity supply, areas in Lalganj, Sareni and Khiro blocks are affected due to low canal water availability. Canal cutting- approx. 100 cases per year are reported. Cases are filed under Canal Act. Total irrigated area-157,000 ha, of which 64000 ha from canal, 93000 ha from TW, and pumpsets. About 25000 ha area is rainfed. There are no ponds which are used for irrigation. Ground water: Sareni block has been declared as critical in terms of ground water exploitation (pre-monsoon water level 74.03 m bgl, post-monsoon 79.96 m bgl). Khiro and Rahi blocks are in semi-critical category. Pre-monsoon water level 45.45 m bgl and post- 38.69m in Khiro block. In Rahi block, pre- and post- water levels are 13.52 and 23.49 m bgl. Remaining blocks are in safe category for GW. Loans: Crop loans are available through Co-operatives to 100,000 members. About 120,000 farmers have KCC from commercial banks. (Total number of farmers-293,000). Moneylenders charge exorbitantly, @ 5% per month interest. Labour rates: Urban area minimum rate is Rs. 200 / day, in rural area more than Rs. 125/day (MNREGA rate is 125/ day). MNREGA has reduced labour migration to some extent. MNREGA: Deepening of ponds, land reclamation works like- levelling, bunding, construction of check dams and bundhis, fisheries activity, etc., are taken up under this programme. Problems: Timely payment to labourers is not done. EFMS (Electronic Fund Management System) may improve this, if adopted. Labourer does not know his right to demand work, and he is not sure whether he will get work if he so demands. All those who desire to work, get work. Health: There is a problem of Fluoride toxicity in the ground water used for drinking in the district. The district has been taken up under Floured control programme. Lalganj and Sareni blocks are affected more due to Fluoride problem. In the recently dug borewell in the proposed Railway Coach Factory premises, 2.5 ppm Fl was found. Under the UPWSRP, steps may be taken to provide drinking water supply from surface water (canal) in the Fluoride affected blocks. 165 Waterlogging: Along the main feeder, waterlogging is prevalent on both sides of the canal affecting 500 to 600 ha area. Wetlands: There is no large wetlands in the district. Ponds & Fisheries: There are 12,445 ponds in the district, covering 10,462 ha area. These ponds are of 0.1 to 30 ha area. About 7400 ponds are of 0.2 ha or more area. Total fish production is about 5500 t/ year. Productivity is 35 q/ha/yr. Both Indian major carps and other carps are taken. Marketing is no problem, and is done locally and to Lucknow. Problems: Only 17% ponds are productive as the remaining ponds are left out due to non-leasing by Revenue Department Lease is given on 1250 ha area whereas 7400 ha area is economically viable. Ponds are leased to the community. Fisherman and SC/ST of the village get the lease. Dairy: Milk production is 50,000 litres/day, both under Mother Dairy and Milk Co- operative. Processing units are available. The rate of milk in rural area is Rs. 20 /litre and is bought @ Rs. 24-28 /litre by the Co-operative sector. Animal Husbandary: There are 30 veterinary Hospitals and 57 AI centres. Due to less number of LEOs, 45 AI centres are functional. 15 centres of BAIF support AI activities and are doing good work. Green fodder, like- Jowar and Berseem is available. Natural Disaster: Floods and Drought are not a problem in the district. Tribes: No tribal population in the district. BPL families: As per 2002 census, 213,108 BPL families in the district ie. about 50% total rural families. Social problems: Illiteracy, inequality and practice of purdah are the problems. Among women, literacy is less than 50%. Industry: No cottage industry. Thermal power plant, Paper Mill, Cement factory and Telephone unit are the major industrial units. Recently, a Rail Coach Factory is being established. SHG: out of 12197 SHGs 11453 SHGs are active in the district, of which 2821 are Women SHGs. Activities include micro-credit through revolving fund for mini dairy, piggery, poultry, cycle repair, tailoring, etc. 15 NGOs are involved in SHG activities. Rajiv Gandhi Women Empowerment Scheme is also working for women development. Waste disposal: Traditional pits in the villages are used. 3.4.2 Findings of Focussed Group discussion in district Barabanki 166 The meeting held on 05.09.2012 was attended by 14 senior officials of deferent departments including Animal Husbandry, Fisheries, Health, Irrigation, DRDA, Education, Minor Irrigation, Jal Nigam, Forest and Agriculture. The discussion yielded the following information about the conditions in the District: 1. Agriculture: Net sown area in Kharif 1,96,253 Ha. Rabi 1,99,816 Ha. Zaid 1,23,943 Ha. 2. Productivity of Major crops: Wheat 32.52 Qtl/ Ha. Barely 22.39 Qtl/ Ha. Gram 10.90 Qtl/ Ha. Maize 30.00 Qtl/ Ha. Rape seed/Mustard 10.41 Qtl/ Ha. Paddy 27.35 Qtl/ Ha. 3. Crop Diversification: Area of the following crops increased. Crops Area under Crops (Ha) Replaced Crops 1. Rapeseeds 35,100 Wheat 2. Mentha 91,820 Urad/Moong 3. Banana 500 Paddy, Wheat 4. Tulsi 400 Paddy/ Arhar It was estimated that productivity of crops may increase by 5 to 10 percent in case Canal water reacheds tail end. Soil testing is conducted by the Agriculture department seven places in the district. Horticulture: Area under potato is 13,850 ha, which is increasing. Tomato area is 3785 ha which is also increasing. Area under green peas, brinjal and cauliflower is reducing. Among floriculture species, gladiolus and gerbera are being introduced in Ramnagar area through National Horticulture Mission. Green chillies and garlic are prominent among spices. Due to the problem of water logging, ginger etc. are not taken. Among fruits, area under banana (609 ha) has increased. Tissue cultured banana are available to farmers, which are being supplied by Sheel Biotech, Gurgaon, M/s H. U. Gugle, Bangalore and TRRI, New Delhi and others. Mango covers 12170 ha; prominent varieties include Dusehri, Langra and Chausa. Guava orchard covers 184 ha Mentha covers a significant area (75850 ha). Problem of marketing of fruits and vegetables like banana, mango and tomato does not exist as there is a ready market at Lucknow. Subsidy on micro-irrigation facility is limited to 60% to marginal and small farmers and 50% to others, which does not seem to attract many farmers. 167 Irrigation: The canal length is 1100 km in the district. 75% of CCA is actually irrigated in kharif and 52 % in rabi. Due to head reach, silting in canals is more in this district. Desilting is done only once in a year, which is not sufficient. 21 out of 251 canal minors 21 are not able to supply water at the tail end. The problem is mainly in Sidhaur, Bani and Ramsanehighat blocks. Incidence of canal cutting is increasing. FIRs are registered against this.  Canal operating efficiency was reportedly 72%.  There is problem of seepage in Daryabad Branch canal and area affected at right bank was 11180 Ha and at left bank 8550 Ha.  Condition of outlets was reportedly not satisfactory.  There was no WUAs in the district.  100% revenue collection is done. Minor Irrigation: The total number of shallow TWs are 103266, of which 2772 are electricity operated, 98,898 are diesel operated and 1596 are from other sources. Due to availability of ground water, shallow and medium deep private TWs are very common. Allocation of boring expenses to MI department. in the case of Shallow boring (less than 30 m bore depth) is Rs. 5000 to small farmers, Rs. 7000 to marginal farmers and Rs. 10,000 to SC/ST farmers. The additional cost, if any, has to be borne by the farmers. A subsidy on purchase of pump sets is provided @ Rs. 2800 to small, 3750 to marginal and 5650 to SC/ST farmers by the Goverment. For medium deep (30-60m deep) boring, farmers have to deposit Rs. 1500 as the cost of Resistivity survey. The Minor Irrigigation Department bears 50% cost of boring, pump house, sump house and drain and the remaining 50% cost is to be borne by the farmer. In the year 2012-13, 6400 borings are proposed on small and marginal farmers land (General and OBC), and 2400 on SC/ ST farmers. Ground water: There is no problem of declining ground water in the district. Drinking water: Jal Nigam had taken up during 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09, seven schemes for quality problem. There are 43,600 India Mark II HPs in the district. Almost all habitations are covered under drinking water supply. The remaining are being taken up now. Both GOI and State schemes are operational for drinking water supply. There is no requirement of drinking water supply from the canal in the district due to adequate GW available. Labour rates: Urban area minimum rate is Rs. 200 / day, in rural area more than Rs. 125/ day (MNREGA rate is 125/ day). MNREGA has reduced labour migration to some extent. MNREGA: Labour rate is Rs. 125 per day.There is no problem of labour availability. Women participation till last year was almost nil, now being increased upto 11%. Deepening of ponds, land reclamation works like- leveling, bunding, construction of 168 check dams and bundhis, flood control works, drain restoration, plantation of saplings desilting of canals, fisheries activity, etc., are taken up under this programme. Problems: Timely payment to labourers is not done. E-muster roll has been started from this year. EFMS (Electronic Fund Management System) may improve the timely payment, which is planned to be initiated from Oct. 2012. Labourer does not know his right to demand work, and he is not sure whether he will get work if he so demands. All those who desire to work, may get work. Health: Among vector-borne diseases, Filarial is reported in the district. 752 cases were reported last year There is a problem of iron toxicity in the ground water used for drinking in Trivediganj, Haidergarh, Ramsanehighat and Ramnagar blocks. Last year, six schemes have been taken up to tackle the problem in the district. Waterlogging: Along the main feeder, waterlogging is prevalent on both sides of the canal affecting about 2000 Ha area. Forest and Wetlands: Area under forest is 5565 ha.These are riverine forests, in patches along Ghaghra and Gomti rivers banks. Canal and roadside plantations exists and new plantations are also being taken up under social forestry scheme. Due to the security problem, no plantation are being done now along rail way line. Commercial species are mainly Shisham and Khair. Among special trees, ‘Parijat’ in Ramnagar tehsil may be mentioned (there are only six Parijat trees in U.P.). Among large water bodies, Bhagaharjhil under gram samaj is now proposed to be developed by Forest department under MNREGA. Ponds & Fisheries: There are 8961 ponds in the district, covering 6220 ha area. These ponds are mainly community - owned, 22 ponds are under private ownership, covering 14 ha area. In addition, there are 49 jhils, covering 415 ha area. Only 3 jhils are with Fisheries Department and are used for seed stock and production; remaining are under private ownership. Productivity of fish is 29.5 q /ha/yr. Both Indian major carps (Rohu, Katla and Mrigal ) and other carps (silver, grass and common ) are taken. Marketing is no problem, and is done locally and to Lucknow. Problems: Use of TW water for fish ponds proves costly. Irrigation Department may provide canal water to fish ponds which will work out to be cheaper. Dairy: Milk production is low. The average milk production as per survey by A.H. Department in 2008-09 for milch cow was 1.62 litres/day, and 2.55 litres /day for buffalo. Processing units are available. One unit of PCDF and one private dairy (Devasheesh) is available, apart from one collecting and chilling centre. Animal Husbandry: There are 36 veterinary Hospitals and one Mobile unit. There are 102 A.I. centres. There is a scarcity of green fodder due to increase in Mentha, Banana and Tomato area. Berseem is grown but the supply is not sufficient. Harvesting of rice and wheat by combines has also affected the availability of dry fodder. Common cattle 169 health problem includes worm infestation and seasonal illness. Vaccination is done by the Department Trace element / micronutrient deficiency, and sterility are the problems. Natural Disaster: Floods are a problem, occurring almost every year. A 54 km stretch along Ghaghra on the left bank and 24 km on the right bank are affected by floods. After the 2009 high floods, embankment on the entire 54 km length have been approved. SirouliGauspur ,Ramnagar, and part of RamsanehiGhattahsils are affected by floods. Tribes: No tribal population in the district. BPL families: As per 2002 survey is rural area were 3,14,363 i.e. 47%. Social problems: Illiteracy, inequality and purdah are the problems. Among women, literacy is low. Industry: No cottage industry. Reliance Fibre, Govind Farm Equipments, Biscuit factory at Safedabad, IPL Somaiyya Group at Dewa and sugar mill at Haidergarhare the major industrial units. SHG: 10,185 SHGs exist in the district, out of which 1,008 are defunct. 1744 are Women SHGs. Activities include micro-credit through revolving fund for mini dairy, poultry, cycle, diesel engine and pump set repair, tailoring, fisheries, handlooms, vermi-compost, floriculture, tent house, mini rice mill, goatery, beauty parlour, chiken and zardosi work etc. Dairy is the largest among SHG activities. The average number of members in the group is 12-15, while the guideline is 10-20 members. It is estimated that every member is able to earn an average of Rs. 500 to Rs. 600 per month. 3.4.3 Focussed Groupn discussion in district-Amethi; Venue: Collectorate, Amethi The meeting held on 04-09-2012 was attended by the CDO and senior officials of Agriculture, Irrigation and Animal Husbandry departments. Other Line department’s officials could not attend as they were engaged in Tehsil Diwas. The discussion yielded the following information about the conditions in the district: Agriculture: Net Sown Area in Kharif : 1.52 Lakh Ha Net Sown Area in Rabi : 1.36 Lakh Ha Net Sown Area in Zaid : 0.12 Lakh Ha Productivity of Wheat : 24.0 Qtl./Ha Rice : 22.7 Qtl./Ha Arhar : 10.2 Qtl./Ha No new crops are sown. In case Canal water is supplied adequately and timely increase in sown area may be marginal. Crop production may increase significantly i.e. upto about 10% if canal water is supplied adequately and timely. There is problem of salinity in Amethi Tenshil and about 5000 Ha area is affected. Procurement centres do not purchase 170 entire produce of farmers. They purchase upto their target only and the remaining produce is sold in local market at comparatively lower rates. Irrigation: Canal Length : 1900 Km. Govt. Tubewells : 410 Private including Pumpsets : 80500 About 70% of the net sown area was irrigated. Canal water was available timely and adequately. There was no problem of tail and uses of the canal remaining unserved. Incidences of canal cutting and blocking of water by upstream users were few. Desilting of canal was done once a year. The efficiency of canal operation is about 70%. The outlets are maintained in good condition. There is no seepage problem in canals. Roaster system for canal water was operational. WUAs have been formed. No specific role of women users has been envisaged. There is no willingness of the farmers to manage water sharing and maintain canal through WUAs. Only about 10-20% of WUAs were willing to manage and collect dues from farmers. There is no problem in collection of water charges, which were collected through Tahsils. Animal Husbandry: There were 33 Veternary hospitals, and 44 AI Centres out of which only 10 were functioning. There were about 10-15% cross breed milch cattles. The production of Milk was about 80000 Litre per day, most of which is transported outside to mother dairy and PCDF. A proposal for 9 large dairies in the district has been processed and sent to Lead bank Development Manager (NABARD). There was no milk processing units in the district. Fodder is not a problem for animals. Common diseases related to livestock include: Worm infestation, particularly in low lying and water logged areas, pneumonia in cold weather and Trypanosomes in which case animal become blind, starts circling, suffer with high fever and uneasiness. If not treated timely, dies. Major Industrial units in the district include: Indo-gulf Fertilizers Co. Ltd., Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., SAIL Jagdishpur Unit and Quality Packagings. 171 Some of the water related issues identified in FGDs in LGC districts are given below S. No. District related to Water Related Issues water 1. Auraiya  Sources of drinking water were local handpumps, well and India Mark-II handpumps. 2. Etah:  Groundwater is contaminated in many places in the district. 3. Etawah  The source of drinking water across the district is chiefly ground water. However, surface source development will reduce cost, improve the cost and will check indiscriminate use of ground water.  Hand pumps are not a permanent source of water supply. However the situation as of now is that not only human but even cattle have to depend on hand pump for its drinking water requirement.  Maintenance of hand pumps have been entrusted to the Gram Sabhas. 90% - 95% diseases are related to bad water supply. Lack of maintenance in urban area leads to bad quality of water. 4. Farrukhabad  Jal Nigam is currently setting up a system of water supply in the district following which sewage treatment will be taken up. The average water table in the district is at 8 – 10 metres except in two blocks which are in the grey zone and the water table has fallen to 30 metres.  There are a total of 26 piped water supply systems across the district which is majorly catering to the rural areas. Rest of the areas not covered under piped water supply are serviced by tubewells.  As regards water quality, excess of iron content has been reported in one block. Water quality testing facility is available in the district.  The Village Water and Sanitation committees of the Gram Panchayat can be used to disseminate information regarding water use and efficiency, cropping patterns, irrigation systems etc. 5. Fatehpur  Source of drinking water is India Mark-II handpumps and tubewells. 6. Firozabad  Piped water supply system covers most parts of the district. Excess fluoride in groundwater has been found in some blocks closer to Etah district.  Over exploitation of water and excessive use of chemical fertilizer, are the major issues in the district. 7. Kannauj district  Groundwater table in the canal fed areas are quite satisfactory whereas in the remaining parts of the district, its at an alarming level due to excessive overdrawing for irrigation. Kannauj and Jalalabad blocks are in the dark zone where the water table is alarmingly low.  There is a water quality testing lab in the district operational since 2003-04. However Gram Panchayats (GPs) have also been provided with water testing kits and have been trained to use them to test the quality of water from time to time. Till date no GPs has sent a single sample of water to the department.  There are around 13392 sources of India Mark II hand pumps and tubewells across the district. Most parts of the district 172 S. No. District related to Water Related Issues water are catered to by the piped water supply scheme through deep tubewells.  The department had implemented a few water conservations schemes like construction of soak pits etc. but was not able to continue the same due to paucity of funds. Also the terrain across the district is plain which does not provide much scope of water harvesting / water conservation works like check dams etc. except farm ponds, irrigation channels etc.  Convergence with MGNREGA is not possible for undertaking water conservation works as under the scheme, the material labour ratio is 60:40 whereas the norms of the department is 80:20. 8. Kaushambi  For drinking water, local as well as India mark-II handpumps, Tubewells and wells are used. 9. Kanpur Dehat  Source of drinking water is generally local and India Mark-II handpumps. Handpumps of 30-40 feet deep boring discharge polluted water.  All public schools have India Mark-II handpumps and toilets. 10. Kanpur Nagar  Source of drinking water in rural areas is mostly India Mark-II handpumps and in towns and city is piped water.  Testing of drinking water quality is done at the time of boring for handpumps.  Average ground water level in the district is about 20 m. Tehsil Bilhaur has 9 m while Tehsil Kanpur has 25 m deep water table. 11. Kasganj  Kasganj lies in dark zone with respect to ground water zonation based on the ground water table. Drinking water supply is based on hand pumps and tube wells. In urban areas piped water supply is used to provide drinking water whereas in rural areas there are 26 piped water supply schemes and hand pumps (IM II) covering the entire district. This is to prevent water borne diseases. However, some habitations are not covered with water supply schemes and some hand pumps become dysfunctional every year. This indicates lack of services in potable water supply. Treated water is supplied through overhead tanks. 12. Mainpuri  Farmers opt for boring despite ban by the Government on Private and Government bore wells.  U.P. Pollution Control Board (UPPCB) monitors the quality of river water both at the upstream and downstream. There is only one water polluting industry in the district. Any renovation of canal works should avoid polluting industries. Construction of ponds will definitely help in raising the water table. Source: FGD, IRGSSA 4.5.5 Performance of Surface Water Schemes Performnce of surface water schemes in LGC & Haidergarh has been described based on FGDs conducted in Project area. Some of the Issues which emerged during FGDs are given below. 173 LGC S.No. District Canal System Related Issues 1. Auraiya  Serious problem of drainage, water logging and seepage in blocks Achhalda and Bidhuna.  Seepage in Etawah Branch canal leading to sodicity, salinity and sandy soil.  Canal water in 4 number tail end minors with command area of about 400 Ha is not reaching.  Problems preventing canal water from reaching tail end include: indisciplined farmers, illegal outlets and absence of osrabandi.  Desilting of canal is done twice a year, during April-June and October-November.  About 60 cases per year of canal cutting / blocking were recorded.  For canal cutting/ Blocking Tawan (penalty) of Rs. 3.5 Lakh was collected last year and 6 cases were filed under Canal Act.  Canal seepage has affected about 1490 Ha area.  Condition of outlets was not satisfactory as most of them are damaged.  Roaster system for canal water was in operation.  WUAs does not exist.  Water charges are collected through Tehsil. Though collections were 100% but mostly delayed. 2. Etah:  Canal cutting is a grave issue affecting irrigation efficiency.  The reason behind cutting of canals is the reduced width of the distributaries and minor canal. Growth of vegetation and deposition of earthen materials along the banks of the distributaries, minors and field channels (gools) lead to reduced width, thus resulting in reduced water availability. This prompts farmers to tamper with kulaba system by cutting the minor and increasing the width of gools to get water to the farms. Because of this, tail end farmer get reduced flow of water or no water at all.  The cleaning and desilting of the distributaries, field channels or gool does not take place regularly – only once a year, a major reason for reduced water flow. Because of poor drainage and maintenance of gool, water from farm lands can’t be drained properly. Maintenance of Gool is not in the jurisdiction of Irrigation Department.  The discharge in canal network is higher than the original design and capacity of the canal. Nevertheless, the water demand and increased area under agriculture and cropping intensity, make the current canal network not being able to meet the demands.  Funds available under MGNREGS should and can be used to clean and desilt the distributaries and field channels. The panchayat may take this responsibility after seeking permission from the Irrigation Department. 3. Etawah  Adequate availability of water for irrigation in canals can benefit activities of other departments like drinking water and sanitation etc. Canal water is available at very cheaper rates as against water from tubewells / bore wells.  However in reality canal water has reduced and there are no provisions to distribute water equitably. Further there is lot 174 S.No. District Canal System Related Issues of wastage especially in Kharif crops. If the water is conserved and wastage can be controlled, more area can be brought under irrigation.  The department has not conducted any training or orientation for farmers on effective water use as per crops. There is a need for construction of minors and ‘gules’ to convey the water to the fields which is not happening currently.  The reason behind breaching of canals are man-made, animal and nature created. Most of the time it is man-made.  The irrigation structures have become very old and calls for maintenance and modernization with new equipments.  Participatory irrigation will be best understood with the formation of WUAs as per the PIM Act and will be constituted soon.  The restructuring project will be sustainable only when modernization / automation will happen in the case of construction of new canal systems, maintenance and rehabilitation and in arresting breaches of the canal structure.  The Sinchai Bandhu initiative is running well in the district. 4. Farrukhabad  Canal network is around 140 km which is highly insufficient compared to the demand. Canal and Kulaba breaching is also a phenomenon occurring in places where water is available. The water hardly reaches the tail end and hence there is every need to increase the amount of water supply for irrigation along with improving the infrastructure.  Since there is very little water, there is hardly any instance of water logging in the district. Most of the irrigation needs are catered to by the private tubewells / bore wells.  The excess of paddy cultivation in the district is also a reason for higher demand of irrigation water which is resulting in overdrawing of groundwater in the absence of an elaborate canal system.  Construction of cattle ghats to prevent damages, lining of canals and remodeling are of utmost importance in the district.  The incidence of flood is only when water from upstream is released from dams and barrages. It is not due to rains as is the common perception as the amount of rainfall has decreased in the district. The flood water can be diverted through canals which is not currently happening and hence the drainage system needs to be rejuvenated.  Enforcement of regulations need to be done to ensure full water availability at the tail end.  There have been no measures taken by the district to check siltation. Neither have there been any structures installed in this regard.  The irrigation department has been involved in orienting / educating farmers 1-2 times on irrigation systems, water use and management using CDs and DVDs. However there have been no such efforts off late by the department.  ‘Sinchai Mitra’ – Friends of Irrigation is an initiative by the district administration wherein monthly meetings are held with the irrigation, agriculture and other allied departments and is chaired by the Chairman of the Zila Panchayat. Such meetings which used to yield good results and most importantly ensure inter-departmental coordination are no longer a feature since quite some time.  The Jiledars of the Irrigation dept. holds monthly meetings with farmers on the 25th of every month to sort out irrigation 175 S.No. District Canal System Related Issues related issues.  There is hardly any information / knowledge about the canal roster system amongst villagers. They are not aware as to when does the canal run and the right time to irrigate their fields. Hence the increased dependence on tubewells. The department should broadcast the roster schedule regularly through local television and newspaper so as to inform the farmers about the availability of water. Average power availability is around 8 hrs in rural areas. 5. Fatehpur  Canal works on roster basis but timely water is sometime not available to farmers.  Canal water does not reach tail end in Block Khaga.  Desilting of canal is done once a year.  Cases of canal cutting and Blocking are large, particularly during Kharif, but not reported.  Canal operating efficiency in Rabi was reportedly 35% and in Kharif 30%.  Outlets were mostly tampered. 6. Firozabad  The Gram Panchayats can use MGNREGS funds to clean gools (a local term for conduits connecting the distributaries to the field) and minors. 7. Kannauj district  Uncontrolled distribution of water is the major problem in the district despite availability at present. Issues like rampant breach of canal by farmers, installing illegal conduits etc. results in the water not reaching the tail end. Even if the water reaches, it starts flowing in the reverse direction.  Almost 80% of irrigation across the district is through tubewells / bore wells. There is a lot of wastage of water.  Reclamation of land has resulted in increase of net sown area which implies more demand for irrigation against the existing infrastructure. Every year there is an increase of 10% of reclaimed land and such land cannot be left idle which means irrigation has to be ensured round the year. Also an average of 3-4 crops a year is taken across the district which leads to more demand. All this implies expansion of the existing infrastructure / new systems to cater to the increasing demand. 8. Kaushambi  Fatehpur canal which also serve some part of the district has 25 minors and in 19 of them water was not reaching at tail end.  Desilting of canal is done before Rabi and Kharif (November and June)  Cases of canal cutting/Blocking are common. Tawan (Fine) was charged from two groups of farmers and 6 cases under canal Act were filed for Blocking in the last one year.  Canal operating efficiency was approximately 50%.  There was no problem of seepage in canal.  Condition of outlets was reported as satisfactory.  Roaster system was in practice 176 S.No. District Canal System Related Issues 9. Kanpur Dehat  Due to shortage of canal water, many farmers were shifting to pulses- Arhar, Moong and Urd.  Canal Water supply was neither adequate nor timely.  In at least 10% of tail end minors water was not reaching.  Desilting of canal was done every year during November-December.  Large Number of incidences of Canal cutting/ Blocking are reported. In 2010-11 30 cases were filed and in 8 cases FIR were lodged with the police in Nabipur Khand. Tawan (penalty) amounting to Rs. 275000/- was recovered in 32 cases.  Condition of outlets was reportedly poor/damaged.  Roaster system exist but actually supply depend on availability of water in canal.  WUAs does not exist, voters list under preparation.  100% water charges are collected through Tehsil. 10. Kanpur Nagar  Canal water available as per roaster.  Desilting of Canal is done once in a year, before Rabi.  Canal irrigation charges were Rs. 287/- per Ha. both in Rabi and Kharif.  WUAs have not been formed in the district, list of farmers was being prepared for voters list.  Incidences of Canal cutting/blocking were reportedly 50 in a year. For which Tawan (penalty) is recovered in some cases while in other, cases are filed through Deputy Revenue Officer.  About 50% of outlets were reportedly damaged.  100% irrigation charges are collected through Tehsil Staff. 11. Kasganj  The discharge in the canal system is higher than the designed capacity and hence calls for remodelling.  Increased discharge and lack of wings in the canal has caused seepage, soil erosion and breaching of the canals. Gates in minor canals are lacking.  There is an urgent need for lining of minors, desilting of drains and installation of silt traps.  Drainage system needs to be improved and developed. Maintenance requires budgetary support which is not adequate and regular at this moment.  The issue of cutting of canals is very rampant in the district and initiatives taken by the Irrigation Department to regulate it turn out to be futile. ‘Seejpaals’ who are the field level personnel of the department are often manhandled/threatened by the farmers in case they try to object canal cutting or report the matter for disciplinary action. Many a times, FIRs are also lodged against the offenders but very little happens as punitive measures. This has created a sense of disillusion and discontent among workers. There are reported instances of pilferage of transformers and oil as well. 12. Mainpuri  The entire irrigation infrastructure in the district is around 125 years old and have crossed their life span. There have been no restructuring or remodeling of the existing structures. Farmers keep on circulating hot and cold water to and from the field. They also do not allow the passage of water through their fields to other fields. All this results in huge 177 S.No. District Canal System Related Issues wastages.  All blocks in the district are covered under canal irrigation. Canal breaching is a serious issue like in other districts. The irrigation department has not conducted any training or orientation for the farming community on efficient water use.  Despite a good canal system, use of bore wells still remains rampant across the district. There are two blocks out of nine which falls in the dark zone indicating overexploitation of groundwater. There are number of waterlogged sites in the district which calls for a comprehensive drainage system.  There is acute shortage of staff in the department – almost 50% positions are vacant. The department officials especially those at the field level need to be trained on how to deal with erring farmers and how to cope with issues like political patronage thus making disciplinary action almost impossible.  Excess of water is a disadvantage as it does not get drained and some areas do not have gools for directing water to the fields. On the other hand there are places which do not get water. 30% of the total land area remains inundated for a major part of the year thus rendering it useless for agriculture.  It is not possible to grow crops in the entire field area as conveyance of water is a big issue. Minors should be connected which will enable a large area to be irrigated. Source: FGD, IRGSSA 178 Summary of Issues LGC Command Area Stakeholders Recommendations / Major Environment Major Findings in LGC Major Findings in Cause suggestions as Issues Command Area Districts from FGDs outcome of Proposed Project Interventions Soil Erosion in the Illegal cutting of forest for firewood and other Silting of LGC System Desilting is undertaken Desilting, drainage and Catchment area, which uses, incidence of flood during rainy season, under MNREGA, but restoration of canals leads to silt deposition in Lack of Warwandi and usarwandi in the system, only restricted to field water bodies. undulating farm fields, movement of cattle’s in drains canals, slippage of banks, erosion of bed Decreasing Fertility of soil Imbalance and higher use of chemical fertilizers, Increasing consumption of Increasing use of Farm Promote Increased use & increasing consumption At the head end of canal command area reported, chemical fertilizers Yard Manure of Farm Yard Manure of fertilizer reduction in Soil fertility due to sodicity/ water logging. Very low practices of soil testing Changes in land use Forest cover is going to reduce due to illegal Exists in command area Occuring due to Project with arrest land particularly in catchment cutting of forest for firewood and other uses in decreasing fertility level. diversification to some area e.g. decreasing forest some district extent. cover & diversion of land for other uses (non agriculture) Extreme climatic National phenomena due to climate change Once in ten years Once in ten years Crop diversification to conditions, rainfall combat extreme deficiency conditions Limited availability of Lower forest cover, insufficient natural surface Water does not reach tail 6% increase in Canal water should be Surface Water water resources, topography of the local area, end due to seepage productivity with timely made available lack of knowledge regarding water conservation availability. and selection of crops. Insufficient of funds for care & maintenance of surface water resources, insufficient manpower for water management and collection of water charges, Insufficient and untimely supply of canal water, Due to higher use at head & middle end and illegal cutting water does not reach tail end, lack of knowledge regarding water conservation and conjunctive use of water. Limited availability of Overuse of ground water for irrigation, 69% to 70% Ground water Increasing use of ground Canal water should be 179 Stakeholders Recommendations / Major Environment Major Findings in LGC Major Findings in Cause suggestions as Issues Command Area Districts from FGDs outcome of Proposed Project Interventions Ground Water deficiency in rainfall, lower recharge due to development water made available topography and geological conditions of the region. Surface & Ground Water Surface water quality was good due to higher Ground water quality is of Fluoride and in certain Drinking water supply Quality dilution capacity of river/canals and lower concern blocks to be providing from presence of water polluting industries. Canal Drinking water quality was observed above permissible limit in some part of LGC due to lower strata and geological conditions of the region. It may also be due to unscientific practices such as improper management of sewage and solid waste. Increasing dependence on Untimely and insufficient availability of canal Limited availability of Increasing dependence Reduced dependence on ground water for irrigation water, Water not reach at tail end, Lack of canal water on ground water ground water in comparison to surface awareness regarding conjunctive use of water, water. water conservation & integrated water resource management. Decrease in forest cover, Wild animals eat the newly grown plant, Rainfall Land use change indicate Nilgai menace has been None of the vulnerability of Flora & deficiency and high temperature also affect on very less forest cover report recommendations given Fauna newly grown plant. Illegal cutting of forest for by the stakeholders. firewood for cooking and other uses. Sodicity / Salinity High ground water level at the head of canal Land use indicates barren Exists in Mainpuri & Reduced salinity / unculturable land other districts at the head sodicity Water logging Due to seepage, illegal cutting or damage of Major water logging Exists in Mainpuri & Drainage should be minor/canal problem was observed at other districts at the head improved the head end of canal command area Summary of Issues (Haidergarh Branch Area) 180 Stakeholders Recommendations / Major Environment Major Findings in 23 down Major Findings in 3 Cause suggestions as outcome Issues Haidergarh Command Area Disticts of Proposed Project Interventions Soil Erosion in the Illegal cutting of forest for firewood and other uses, Silting of Haidergarh System Desilting is undertaken Desilting & drainage Catchment area, which incidence of flood during rainy season, Lack of under MNREGA, but only restoration of canals leads to silt deposition in Warwandi and usarwandi in the system, undulating restricted to field drains. water bodies. farm fields, movement of cattle’s in canals, slippage of banks, erosion of bed. Decreasing Fertility of soil Imbalance and higher use of chemical fertilizers, At Increasing consumption of Increasing use of Farm Increased use of Farm & increasing consumption the head end of canal command area reported chemical fertilizers Yard Manure Yard Manure of fertilizer (Refer table 4.4 reduction in Soil fertility due to sodicity/ water & 4.5). logging. Very low practices of soil testing. Changes in land use Forest cover is going to reduce due to illegal cutting Exists in command area Occuring due to decreasing Project with arrest land particularly in catchment of forest for firewood and other uses fertility level. diversification to some area e.g. decreasing forest extent. cover & diversion of land for other uses (non agriculture) Extreme climatic Natural phenomena due to climae change. Once in ten years Once in ten years Crop diversification to conditions, rainfall combat extreme conditions deficiency & drought Limited availability of Lower forest cover, insufficient natural surface water Water does not reach tail end due 6% increase in productivity Canal water should be Surface Water resources, topography of the local area, lack of to seepage with timely availability. made available knowledge regarding water conservation and selection of crops. Insufficient of funds for care & maintenance of surface water resources, insufficient manpower for water management and collection of water charges, Insufficient and untimely supply of canal water, Due to higher use at head & middle end and illegal cutting water does not reach tail end, lack of knowledge regarding water conservation and conjunctive use of water. Limited availability of Overuse of ground water for irrigation, deficiency in 69% to 70% Ground water Increasing use of ground Canal water should be Ground Water rainfall, lower recharge due to topography and development water made available geological conditions of the region. Surface & Ground Water Surface water quality was good due to higher dilution Ground water quality is of concern Fluoride and in certain Drinking water supply to Quality capacity of river/canals and lower presence of water blocks be providing from Canal polluting industries. 181 Stakeholders Recommendations / Major Environment Major Findings in 23 down Major Findings in 3 Cause suggestions as outcome Issues Haidergarh Command Area Disticts of Proposed Project Interventions Drinking water quality was observed above permissible limit in some part of Haidergarh due to lower strata and geological conditions of the region. It may also be due to unscientific practices such as improper management of sewage and solid waste. Increasing dependence on Untimely and insufficient availability of canal water, Limited availability of canal water Increasing dependence on Reduced dependence on ground water for irrigation Water not reach at tail end, Lack of awareness ground water ground water in comparison to surface regarding conjunctive use of water, water water. conservation & integrated water resource management. Decrease in forest cover, Wild animals eat the newly grown plant, Rainfall Land use data indicate very less Shrinking habitat leading Canal side plantation vulnerability of Flora & deficiency and high temperature also affect on newly forest cover is very less to Nilgai menace should be implemented. Fauna grown plant. Illegal cutting of forest for firewood for cooking and other uses. Sodicity / Salinity High Ground water level at the head of canal. Land use indicates barren Exists in Dona Minor, Reduced salinity / sodicity unculturable land Raebareli & other districts at the head Water logging Due to seepage, illegal cutting or damage of Water losses from canals indicate Exists in all districts at the Improved drainage minor/canal water logging head of canal 182 Annexure 6.2 A: A summary of various Govt. Policies and Orders 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 OP 4.12 - Involuntary Resettlement These policies were prepared for use by World Bank staff andOP 4.12 are not necessarily a complete treatment of the subject. December, 2001 This Operational Policy statement was updated in February 2011 to clarify the use of Use of Escrow Accounts in order to Help Reduce Delays in Implementation of Resettlement, and Clarification of Funding of Grievance Mechanisms. It was previously revised in March 2007 to reflect the issuance of OP/BP 8.00, Rapid Response to Crises and Emergencies, and in August 2004 to ensure consistency with the requirements of OP/BP 8.60. Questions on this policy may be addressed to OPCS Quality Assurance and Compliance (OPCQC). Note: OP and BP 4.12 together replace OD 4.30, Involuntary Resettlement. These OP and BP apply to all projects for which a Project Concept Review takes place on or after January 1, 2002. Questions may be addressed to the Director, Social Development Department (SDV). Revised February 2011 1. Bank1 experience indicates that involuntary resettlement under development projects, if unmitigated, often gives rise to severe economic, social, and environmental risks: production systems are dismantled; people face impoverishment when their productive assets or income sources are lost; people are relocated to environments where their productive skills may be less applicable and the competition for resources greater; community institutions and social networks are weakened; kin groups are dispersed; and cultural identity, traditional authority, and the potential for mutual help are diminished or lost. This policy includes safeguards to address and mitigate these impoverishment risks. Policy Objectives 2. Involuntary resettlement may cause severe long-term hardship, impoverishment, and environmental damage unless appropriate measures are carefully planned and carried out. For these reasons, the overall objectives of the Bank's policy on involuntary resettlement are the following: (a) Involuntary resettlement should be avoided where feasible, or minimized, exploring all viable alternative project designs.2 (b) Where it is not feasible to avoid resettlement, resettlement activities should be conceived and executed as sustainable development programs, providing sufficient investment resources to enable the persons displaced by the project to share in project benefits. Displaced persons3should be meaningfully consulted and should have 211 opportunities to participate in planning and implementing resettlement programs. (c) Displaced persons should be assisted in their efforts to improve their livelihoods and standards of living or at least to restore them, in real terms, to pre-displacement levels or to levels prevailing prior to the beginning of project implementation, whichever is higher.4 Impacts Covered 3 . This policy covers direct economic and social impacts5 that both result from Bank- assisted investment projects,6 and are caused by (a) the involuntary7 taking of land8 resulting in (i) relocation or loss of shelter; (ii) lost of assets or access to assets; or (iii) loss of income sources or means of livelihood, whether or not the affected persons must move to another location; or (b) the involuntary restriction of access9 to legally designated parks and protected areas resulting in adverse impacts on the livelihoods of the displaced persons. 4. This policy applies to all components of the project that result in involuntary resettlement, regardless of the source of financing. It also applies to other activities resulting in involuntary resettlement, that in the judgment of the Bank, are (a) directly and significantly related to the Bank-assisted project, (b) necessary to achieve its objectives as set forth in the project documents; and (c) carried out, or planned to be carried out, contemporaneously with the project. 5. Requests for guidance on the application and scope of this policy should be addressed to the Resettlement Committee (see BP 4.12, para. 7).10 Required Measures 6. To address the impacts covered under para. 3 (a) of this policy, the borrower prepares a resettlement plan or a resettlement policy framework (see paras. 25-30) that covers the following: (a) The resettlement plan or resettlement policy framework includes measures to ensure that the displaced persons are 212 (i) informed about their options and rights pertaining to resettlement; (ii) consulted on, offered choices among, and provided with technically and economically feasible resettlement alternatives; and (iii) provided prompt and effective compensation at full replacement cost11 for losses of assets12 attributable directly to the project. (b) If the impacts include physical relocation, the resettlement plan or resettlement policy framework includes measures to ensure that the displaced persons are (i) provided assistance (such as moving allowances) during relocation; and (ii) provided with residential housing, or housing sites, or, as required, agricultural sites for which a combination of productive potential, locational advantages, and other factors is at least equivalent to the advantages of the old site.13 (c) Where necessary to achieve the objectives of the policy, the resettlement plan or resettlement policy framework also include measures to ensure that displaced persons are (i) offered support after displacement, for a transition period, based on a reasonableestimate of the time likely to be needed to restore their livelihood and standards of living;14 and (ii) provided with development assistance in addition to compensation measures described in paragraph 6(a); (iii) such as land preparation, credit facilities, training, or job opportunities. 7. In projects involving involuntary restriction of access to legally designated parks and protected areas (see para. 3(b)), the nature of restrictions, as well as the type of measures necessary to mitigate adverse impacts, is determined with the participation of the displaced persons during the design and implementation of the project. In such cases, the borrower prepares a process framework acceptable to the Bank, describing the participatory process by which (a) specific components of the project will be prepared and implemented; (b) the criteria for eligibility of displaced persons will be determined; (c) measures to assist the displaced persons in their efforts to improve their livelihoods, or at least to restore them, in real terms, while maintaining the sustainability of the park or protected area, will be identified; and 213 (d) potential conflicts involving displaced persons will be resolved. The process framework also includes a description of the arrangements for implementing and monitoring the process. 8. To achieve the objectives of this policy, particular attention is paid to the needs of vulnerable groups among those displaced, especially those below the poverty line, the landless, the elderly, women and children, indigenous peoples,15 ethnic minorities, or other displaced persons who may not be protected through national land compensation legislation. 9. Bank experience has shown that resettlement of indigenous peoples with traditional land-based modes of production is particularly complex and may have significant adverse impacts on their identity and cultural survival. For this reason, the Bank satisfies itself that the borrower has explored all viable alternative project designs to avoid physical displacement of these groups. When it is not feasible to avoid such displacement, preference is given to land-based resettlement strategies for these groups (see para. 11) that are compatible with their cultural preferences and are prepared in consultation with them (see Annex A, para. 11). 10. The implementation of resettlement activities is linked to the implementation of the investment component of the project to ensure that displacement or restriction of access does not occur before necessary measures for resettlement are in place. For impacts covered in para. 3(a) of this policy, these measures include provision of compensation and of other assistance required for relocation, prior to displacement, and preparation and provision of resettlement sites with adequate facilities, where required. In particular, taking of land and related assets may take place only after compensation has been paid and, where applicable, resettlement sites and moving allowances have been provided to the displaced persons. For impacts covered in para. 3(b) of this policy, the measures to assist the displaced persons are implemented in accordance with the plan of action as part of the project (see para. 30).16 11. Preference should be given to land-based resettlement strategies for displaced persons whose livelihoods are land-based. These strategies may include resettlement on public land (see footnote 1 above), or on private land acquired or purchased for resettlement. Whenever replacement land is offered, resettlers are provided with land for which a combination of productive potential, locational advantages, and other factors is at least equivalent to the advantages of the land taken. If land is not the preferred option of the displaced persons, the provision of land would adversely affect the sustainability of a park or protected area,17 or sufficient land is not available at a reasonable price, non-land-based options built around opportunities for employment or self-employment should be provided in addition to cash compensation for land and other assets lost. The lack of adequate land must be demonstrated and documented to the satisfaction of the Bank. 12. Payment of cash compensation for lost assets may be appropriate where (a) 214 livelihoods are land-based but the land taken for the project is a small fraction18 of the affected asset and the residual is economically viable; (b) active markets for land, housing, and labor exist, displaced persons use such markets, and there is sufficient supply of land and housing; or (c) livelihoods are not land-based. Cash compensation levels should be sufficient to replace the lost land and other assets at full replacement cost in local markets. 13. For impacts covered under para. 3(a) of this policy, the Bank also requires the following: (a) Displaced persons and their communities, and any host communities receiving them, are provided timely and relevant information, consulted on resettlement options, and offered opportunities to participate in planning, implementing, and monitoring resettlement. Appropriate and accessible grievance mechanisms are established for these groups. (b) In new resettlement sites or host communities, infrastructure and public services are provided as necessary to improve, restore, or maintain accessibility and levels of service for the displaced persons and host communities. Alternative or similar resources are provided to compensate for the loss of access to community resources (such as fishing areas, grazing areas, fuel, or fodder). (c) Patterns of community organization appropriate to the new circumstances are based on choices made by the displaced persons. To the extent possible, the existing social and cultural institutions of resettlers and any host communities are preserved and resettlers' preferences with respect to relocating in preexisting communities and groups are honored. Eligibility for Benefits19 14. Upon identification of the need for involuntary resettlement in a project, the borrower carries out a census to identify the persons who will be affected by the project (see the Annex A, para. 6(a)), to determine who will be eligible for assistance, and to discourage inflow of people ineligible for assistance. The borrower also develops a procedure, satisfactory to the Bank, for establishing the criteria by which displaced persons will be deemed eligible for compensation and other resettlement assistance. The procedure includes provisions for meaningful consultations with affected persons and communities, local authorities, and, as appropriate, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), and it specifies grievance mechanisms. 15. Criteria for Eligibility. Displaced persons may be classified in one of the following three groups: (a) those who have formal legal rights to land (including customary and traditional rights recognized under the laws of the country); 215 (b) those who do not have formal legal rights to land at the time the census begins but have a claim to such land or assets--provided that such claims are recognized under the laws of the country or become recognized through a process identified in the resettlement plan (see Annex A, para. 7(f)); and20 (c) those who have no recognizable legal right or claim to the land they are occupying. 16. Persons covered under para. 15(a) and (b) are provided compensation for the land they lose, and other assistance in accordance with para. 6. Persons covered under para. 15(c) are provided resettlement assistance21 in lieu of compensation for the land they occupy, and other assistance, as necessary, to achieve the objectives set out in this policy, if they occupy the project area prior to a cut-off date established by the borrower and acceptable to the Bank.22 Persons who encroach on the area after the cut-off date are not entitled to compensation or any other form of resettlement assistance. All persons included in para. 15(a), (b), or (c) are provided compensation for loss of assets other than land. Resettlement Planning, Implementation, and Monitoring 17. To achieve the objectives of this policy, different planning instruments are used, depending on the type of project: (a) a resettlement plan or abbreviated resettlement plan is required for all operations that entail involuntary resettlement unless otherwise specified (see para. 25 and Annex A); (b) a resettlement policy framework is required for operations referred to in paras. 26-30 that may entail involuntary resettlement, unless otherwise specified (see Annex A; and (c) a process framework is prepared for projects involving restriction of access in accordance with para. 3(b) (see para. 31). 18. The borrower is responsible for preparing, implementing, and monitoring a resettlement plan, a resettlement policy framework, or a process framework (the "resettlement instruments"), as appropriate, that conform to this policy. The resettlement instrument presents a strategy for achieving the objectives of the policy and covers all aspects of the proposed resettlement. Borrower commitment to, and capacity for, undertaking successful resettlement is a key determinant of Bank involvement in a project. 19. Resettlement planning includes early screening, scoping of key issues, the choice of resettlement instrument, and the information required to prepare the resettlement component or subcomponent. The scope and level of detail of the resettlement instruments vary with the magnitude and complexity of resettlement. In preparing the resettlement component, the borrower draws on appropriate social, technical, and legal expertise and on relevant community-based organizations and NGOs.23 The borrower informs potentially displaced persons at an early stage about the resettlement aspects of 216 the project and takes their views into account in project design. 20. The full costs of resettlement activities necessary to achieve the objectives of the project are included in the total costs of the project. The costs of resettlement, like the costs of other project activities, are treated as a charge against the economic benefits of the project; and any net benefits to resettlers (as compared to the "without-project" circumstances) are added to the benefits stream of the project. Resettlement components or free-standing resettlement projects need not be economically viable on their own, but they should be cost-effective. 21. The borrower ensures that the Project Implementation Plan is fully consistent with the resettlement instrument. 22. As a condition of appraisal of projects involving resettlement, the borrower provides the Bank with the relevant draft resettlement instrument which conforms to this policy, and makes it available at a place accessible to displaced persons and local NGOs, in a form, manner, and language that are understandable to them. Once the Bank accepts this instrument as providing an adequate basis for project appraisal, the Bank makes it available to the public through its InfoShop. After the Bank has approved the final resettlement instrument, the Bank and the borrower disclose it again in the same manner.24 23. The borrower's obligations to carry out the resettlement instrument and to keep the Bank informed of implementation progress are provided for in the legal agreements for the project. 24. The borrower is responsible for adequate monitoring and evaluation of the activities set forth in the resettlement instrument. The Bank regularly supervises resettlement implementation to determine compliance with the resettlement instrument. Upon completion of the project, the borrower undertakes an assessment to determine whether the objectives of the resettlement instrument have been achieved. The assessment takes into account the baseline conditions and the results of resettlement monitoring. If the assessment reveals that these objectives may not be realized, the borrower should propose follow-up measures that may serve as the basis for continued Bank supervision, as the Bank deems appropriate (see also BP 4.12, para. 16). Resettlement Instruments Resettlement Plan 25. A draft resettlement plan that conforms to this policy is a condition of appraisal (see Annex A, paras. 2-21) for projects referred to in para. 17(a) above.25 However, where impacts on the entire displaced population are minor,26or fewer than 200 people are displaced, an abbreviated resettlement plan may be agreed with the borrower (see Annex A, para. 22). The information disclosure procedures set forth in para. 22 217 apply. Resettlement Policy Framework 26. For sector investment operations that may involve involuntary resettlement, the Bank requires that the project implementing agency screen subprojects to be financed by the Bank to ensure their consistency with this OP. For these operations, the borrower submits, prior to appraisal, a resettlement policy framework that conforms to this policy (see Annex A, paras. 23-25). The framework also estimates, to the extent feasible, the total population to be displaced and the overall resettlement costs. 27. For financial intermediary operations that may involve involuntary resettlement, the Bank requires that the financial intermediary (FI) screen subprojects to be financed by the Bank to ensure their consistency with this OP. For these operations, the Bank requires that before appraisal the borrower or the FI submit to the Bank a resettlement policy framework conforming to this policy (see Annex A, paras. 23-25). In addition, the framework includes an assessment of the institutional capacity and procedures of each of the FIs that will be responsible for subproject financing. When, in the assessment of the Bank, no resettlement is envisaged in the subprojects to be financed by the FI, a resettlement policy framework is not required. Instead, the legal agreements specify the obligation of the FIs to obtain from the potential subborrowers a resettlement plan consistent with this policy if a subproject gives rise to resettlement. For all subprojects involving resettlement, the resettlement plan is provided to the Bank for approval before the subproject is accepted for Bank financing. 28. For other Bank-assisted project with multiple subprojects27 that may involve involuntary resettlement, the Bank requires that a draft resettlement plan conforming to this policy be submitted to the Bank before appraisal of the project unless, because of the nature and design of the project or of a specific subproject or subprojects (a) the zone of impact of subprojects cannot be determined, or (b) the zone of impact is known but precise sitting alignments cannot be determined. In such cases, the borrower submits a resettlement policy framework consistent with this policy prior to appraisal (seeAnnex A, paras. 23-25). For other subprojects that do not fall within the above criteria, a resettlement plan conforming to this policy is required prior to appraisal. 29. For each subproject included in a project described in para. 26, 27, or 28 that may involve resettlement, the Bank requires that a satisfactory resettlement plan or an abbreviated resettlement plan that is consistent with the provisions of the policy framework be submitted to the Bank for approval before the subproject is accepted for Bank financing. 30. For projects described in paras. 26-28 above, the Bank may agree, in writing, that subproject resettlement plans may be approved by the project implementing agency or a responsible government agency or financial intermediary without prior Bank review, if that agency has demonstrated adequate institutional capacity to review resettlement plans and ensure their consistency with this policy. Any such delegation, and 218 appropriate remedies for the entity's approval of resettlement plans found not to be in compliance with Bank policy, are provided for in the legal agreements for the project. In all such cases, implementation of the resettlement plans is subject to ex post review by the Bank. Process Framework 31. For projects involving restriction of access in accordance with para. 3(b) above, the borrower provides the Bank with a draft process framework that conforms to the relevant provisions of this policy as a condition of appraisal. In addition, during project implementation and before to enforcing of the restriction, the borrower prepares a plan of action, acceptable to the Bank, describing the specific measures to be undertaken to assist the displaced persons and the arrangements for their implementation. The plan of action could take the form of a natural resources management plan prepared for the project. Assistance to the Borrower 32. In furtherance of the objectives of this policy, the Bank may at a borrower's request support the borrower and other concerned entities by providing (a) assistance to assess and strengthen resettlement policies, strategies, legal frameworks, and specific plans at a country, regional, or sectoral level; (b) financing of technical assistance to strengthen the capacities of agencies responsible for resettlement, or of affected people to participate more effectively in resettlement operations; (c) financing of technical assistance for developing resettlement policies, strategies, and specific plans, and for implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of resettlement activities; and (d) financing of the investment costs of resettlement. 33. The Bank may finance either a component of the main investment causing displacement and requiring resettlement, or a free-standing resettlement project with appropriate cross-conditionalities, processed and implemented in parallel with the investment that causes the displacement. The Bank may finance resettlement even though it is not financing the main investment that makes resettlement necessary. ____________ "Bank" includes IBRD and IDA; "loans" includes IDA credits and IDA grants, guarantees, Project Preparation Facility (PPF) advances and grants; and "projects" includes projects under (a) adaptable program lending; (b) learning and innovation 219 loans; (c) PPFs and Institutional Development Funds (IDFs), if they include investment activities; (d) grants under the Global Environment Facility and Montreal Protocol, for which the Bank is the implementing/executing agency; and (e) grants or loans provided by other donors that are administered by the Bank. The term "project" does not include programs under development policy lending operations. "Borrower" also includes, wherever the context requires, the guarantor or the project implementing agency. In devising approaches to resettlement in Bank-assisted projects, other Bank policies should be taken into account, as relevant. These policies include OP 4.01, Environmental Assessment, OP 4.04, Natural Habitats, OP 4.10, Indigenous Peoples, and OP 4.11, Physical Cultural Resources. The term "displaced persons" refers to persons who are affected in any of the ways described in para. 3 of this OP. Displaced persons under para. 3(b) should be assisted in their efforts to improve or restore their livelihoods in a manner that maintains the sustainability of the parks and protected areas. Where there are adverse indirect social or economic impacts, it is good practice for the borrower to undertake a social assessment and implement measures to minimize and mitigate adverse economic and social impacts, particularly upon poor and vulnerable groups. Other environmental, social, and economic impacts that do not result from land taking may be identified and addressed through environmental assessments and other project reports and instruments. This policy does not apply to restrictions of access to natural resources under community-based projects, i.e. where the community using the resources decides to restrict access to these resources, provided that an assessment satisfactory to the Bank establishes that the community decision-making process is adequate, and that it provides for identification of appropriate measures to mitigate adverse impacts, if any, on the vulnerable members of the community. This policy also does not cover refugees from natural disasters, war, or civil strife (see OP/BP 8.00, Rapid Response to Crises and Emergencies). For the purposes of this policy, "involuntary" means actions that may be taken without the displaced person's informed consent or power of choice. "Land" includes anything growing on or permanently affixed to land, such as buildings and crops. This policy does not apply to regulations of natural resources on a national or regional level to promote their sustainability, such as watershed management, groundwater management, fisheries management, etc. The policy also does not apply to disputes between private parties in land titling projects, although it is good practice for the borrower to undertake a social assessment and implement measures to minimize and mitigate adverse social impacts, especially those affecting poor and vulnerable groups. For the purposes of this policy, involuntary restriction of access covers restrictions on the use of resources imposed on people living outside the park or protected area, or on those who continue living inside the park or protected area during and after project implementation. In cases where new parks and protected areas are created as part of the project, persons who lose shelter, land, or other assets are covered under para. 3(a). Persons who lose shelter in existing parks and protected areas are also covered under para. 3(a). 220 . The Involuntary Resettlement Sourcebook provides good practice guidance to staff on the policy. . "Replacement cost" is the method of valuation of assets that helps determine the amount sufficient to replace lost assets and cover transaction costs. In applying this method of valuation, depreciation of structures and assets should not be taken into account (for a detailed definition of replacement cost, see Annex A, footnote 1). For losses that cannot easily be valued or compensated for in monetary terms (e.g., access to public services, customers, and suppliers; or to fishing, grazing, or forest areas), attempts are made to establish access to equivalent and culturally acceptable resources and earning opportunities. Where domestic law does not meet the standard of compensation at full replacement cost, compensation under domestic law is supplemented by additional measures necessary to meet the replacement cost standard. Such additional assistance is distinct from resettlement assistance to be provided under other clauses of para. 6. . If the residual of the asset being taken is not economically viable, compensation and other resettlement assistance are provided as if the entire asset had been taken. . The alternative assets are provided with adequate tenure arrangements. The cost of alternative residential housing, housing sites, business premises, and agricultural sites to be provided can be set off against all or part of the compensation payable for the corresponding asset lost. . Such support could take the form of short-term jobs, subsistence support, salary maintenance or similar arrangements. . See OP 4.10, Indigenous Peoples. . Where the borrower has offered to pay compensation to an affected person in accordance with an approved resettlement plan, but the offer has been rejected, the taking of land and related assets may only proceed if the borrower has deposited funds equal to the offered amount plus 10 percent in a secure form of escrow or other interest- bearing deposit acceptable to the Bank, and has provided a means satisfactory to the Bank for resolving the dispute concerning said offer of compensation in a timely and equitable manner. . See OP 4.04, Natural Habitats. . As a general principle, this applies if the land taken constitutes less than 20% of the total productive area. . Paras. 13-15 do not apply to impacts covered under para. 3(b) of this policy. The eligibility criteria for displaced persons under 3 (b) are covered under the process framework (see paras. 7 and 30). . Such claims could be derived from adverse possession, from continued possession of public lands without government action for eviction (that is, with the implicit leave of the government), or from customary and traditional law and usage, and so on. . Resettlement assistance may consist of land, other assets, cash, employment, and so on, as appropriate. . Normally, this cut-off date is the date the census begins. The cut-off date could also be the date the project area was delineated, prior to the census, provided that there has been an effective public dissemination of information on the area delineated, and systematic and continuous dissemination subsequent to the delineation to prevent 221 further population influx. . For projects that are highly risky or contentious, or that involve significant and complex resettlement activities, the borrower should normally engage an advisory panel of independent, internationally recognized resettlement specialists to advise on all aspects of the project relevant to the resettlement activities. The size, role, and frequency of meeting depend on the complexity of the resettlement. If independent technical advisory panels are established under OP 4.01, Environmental Assessment, the resettlement panel may form part of the environmental panel of experts. . See The World Bank Policy on Disclosure of Information, para. 34 (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2002). . An exception to this requirement may be made in highly unusual circumstances (such as emergency operations) with the approval of Bank Management (see BP 4.12, para. 8). In such cases, the Management's approval stipulates a timetable and budget for developing the resettlement plan. . Impacts are considered "minor" if the affected people are not physically displaced and less than 10 percent of their productive assets are lost. . For the purpose of this paragraph, the term "subprojects" includes components and subcomponents. OP 4.12, Annex A - Involuntary Resettlement Instruments These policies were prepared for use by World Bank staff OP 4.12 - Annex A and are not necessarily a complete treatment of the subject. December, 2001 Revised February 2011 This Operational Policy statement was updated in February 2011 to clarify the use of Use of Escrow Accounts in order to Help Reduce Delays in Implementation of Resettlement, and Clarification of Funding of Grievance Mechanisms. Questions on this policy may be addressed to OPCS Quality Assurance and Compliance (OPCQC). 1. This annex describes the elements of a resettlement plan, an abbreviated resettlement plan, a resettlement policy framework, and a resettlement process framework, as discussed in OP 4.12, paras. 17-31. Resettlement Plan 2. The scope and level of detail of the resettlement plan vary with the magnitude and complexity of resettlement. The plan is based on up-to-date and reliable information about (a) the proposed resettlement and its impacts on the displaced persons and other adversely affected groups, and (b) the legal issues involved in resettlement. The resettlement plan covers the elements below, as relevant. When any element is not 222 relevant to project circumstances, it should be noted in the resettlement plan. 3. Description of the project. General description of the project and identification of the project area. 4. Potential impacts. Identification of (a) the project component or activities that give rise to resettlement; (b) the zone of impact of such component or activities; (c) the alternatives considered to avoid or minimize resettlement; and (d) the mechanisms established to minimize resettlement, to the extent possible, during project implementation. 5. Objectives. The main objectives of the resettlement program. 6. Socioeconomic studies. The findings of socioeconomic studies to be conducted in the early stages of project preparation and with the involvement of potentially displaced people, including (a) the results of a census survey covering (i) current occupants of the affected area to establish a basis for the design of the resettlement program and to exclude subsequent inflows of people from eligibility for compensation and resettlement assistance; (ii) standard characteristics of displaced households, including a description of production systems, labor, and household organization; and baseline information on livelihoods (including, as relevant, production levels and income derived from both formal and informal economic activities) and standards of living (including health status) of the displaced population; (iii) the magnitude of the expected loss--total or partial--of assets, and the extent of displacement, physical or economic; (iv) information on vulnerable groups or persons as provided for in OP 4.12, para. 8, for whom special provisions may have to be made; and (v) provisions to update information on the displaced people's livelihoods and standards of living at regular intervals so that the latest information is available at the time of their displacement. (b) Other studies describing the following 223 (i) land tenure and transfer systems, including an inventory of common property natural resources from which people derive their livelihoods and sustenance, non-title-based usufruct systems (including fishing, grazing, or use of forest areas) governed by local recognized land allocation mechanisms, and any issues raised by different tenure systems in the project area; (ii) the patterns of social interaction in the affected communities, including social networks and social support systems, and how they will be affected by the project; (iii) public infrastructure and social services that will be affected; and (iv) social and cultural characteristics of displaced communities, including a description of formal and informal institutions (e.g., community organizations, ritual groups, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs)) that may be relevant to the consultation strategy and to designing and implementing the resettlement activities. 7. Legal framework. The findings of an analysis of the legal framework, covering (a) the scope of the power of eminent domain and the nature of compensation associated with it, in terms of both the valuation methodology and the timing of payment; (b) the applicable legal and administrative procedures, including a description of the remedies available to displaced persons in the judicial process and the normal timeframe for such procedures, and any available alternative dispute resolution mechanisms that may be relevant to resettlement under the project; (c) relevant law (including customary and traditional law) governing land tenure, valuation of assets and losses, compensation, and natural resource usage rights; customary personal law related to displacement; and environmental laws and social welfare legislation; (d) laws and regulations relating to the agencies responsible for implementing resettlement activities; (e) gaps, if any, between local laws covering eminent domain and resettlement and the Bank's resettlement policy, and the mechanisms to bridge such gaps; and (f) any legal steps necessary to ensure the effective implementation of resettlement activities under the project, including, as appropriate, a process for recognizing claims to legal rights to land--including claims that derive from customary law and traditional usage (see OP 4.12, para.15 b). 8. Institutional Framework. The findings of an analysis of the institutional framework covering (a) the identification of agencies responsible for resettlement activities and NGOs that 224 may have a role in project implementation; (b) an assessment of the institutional capacity of such agencies and NGOs; and (c) any steps that are proposed to enhance the institutional capacity of agencies and NGOs responsible for resettlement implementation. 9. Eligibility. Definition of displaced persons and criteria for determining their eligibility for compensation and other resettlement assistance, including relevant cut-off dates. 10. Valuation of and compensation for losses. The methodology to be used in valuing losses to determine their replacement cost; and a description of the proposed types and levels of compensation under local law and such supplementary measures as are necessary to achieve replacement cost for lost assets.1 11. Resettlement measures. A description of the packages of compensation and other resettlement measures that will assist each category of eligible displaced persons to achieve the objectives of the policy (see OP 4.12, para. 6). In addition to being technically and economically feasible, the resettlement packages should be compatible with the cultural preferences of the displaced persons, and prepared in consultation with them. 12. Site selection, site preparation, and relocation. Alternative relocation sites considered and explanation of those selected, covering (a) institutional and technical arrangements for identifying and preparing relocation sites, whether rural or urban, for which a combination of productive potential, locational advantages, and other factors is at least comparable to the advantages of the old sites, with an estimate of the time needed to acquire and transfer land and ancillary resources; (b) any measures necessary to prevent land speculation or influx of ineligible persons at the selected sites; (c) procedures for physical relocation under the project, including timetables for site preparation and transfer; and (d) legal arrangements for regularizing tenure and transferring titles to resettlers. 13. Housing, infrastructure, and social services. Plans to provide (or to finance resettlers' provision of) housing, infrastructure (e.g., water supply, feeder roads), and social services (e.g., schools, health services);2plans to ensure comparable services to host populations; any necessary site development, engineering, and architectural designs for these facilities. 14. Environmental protection and management. A description of the boundaries of the 225 relocation area; and an assessment of the environmental impacts of the proposed resettlement3and measures to mitigate and manage these impacts (coordinated as appropriate with the environmental assessment of the main investment requiring the resettlement). 15. Community participation. Involvement of resettlers and host communities,4 (a) a description of the strategy for consultation with and participation of resettlers and hosts in the design and implementation of the resettlement activities; (b) a summary of the views expressed and how these views were taken into account in preparing the resettlement plan; (c) a review of the resettlement alternatives presented and the choices made by displaced persons regarding options available to them, including choices related to forms of compensation and resettlement assistance, to relocating as individuals families or as parts of preexisting communities or kinship groups, to sustaining existing patterns of group organization, and to retaining access to cultural property (e.g. places of worship, pilgrimage centers, cemeteries);5and (d) institutionalized arrangements by which displaced people can communicate their concerns to project authorities throughout planning and implementation, and measures to ensure that such vulnerable groups as indigenous people, ethnic minorities, the landless, and women are adequately represented. 16. Integration with host populations. Measures to mitigate the impact of resettlement on any host communities, including (a) consultations with host communities and local governments; (b) arrangements for prompt tendering of any payment due the hosts for land or other assets provided to resettlers; (c) arrangements for addressing any conflict that may arise between resettlers and host communities; and (d) any measures necessary to augment services (e.g., education, water, health, and production services) in host communities to make them at least comparable to services available to resettlers. 17. Grievance procedures. Affordable and accessible procedures for third-party settlement of disputes arising from resettlement; such grievance mechanisms should take into account the availability of judicial recourse and community and traditional dispute settlement mechanisms. 18. Organizational responsibilities. The organizational framework for implementing 226 resettlement, including identification of agencies responsible for delivery of resettlement measures and provision of services; arrangements to ensure appropriate coordination between agencies and jurisdictions involved in implementation; and any measures (including technical assistance) needed to strengthen the implementing agencies' capacity to design and carry out resettlement activities; provisions for the transfer to local authorities or resettlers themselves of responsibility for managing facilities and services provided under the project and for transferring other such responsibilities from the resettlement implementing agencies, when appropriate. 19. Implementation schedule. An implementation schedule covering all resettlement activities from preparation through implementation, including target dates for the achievement of expected benefits to resettlers and hosts and terminating the various forms of assistance. The schedule should indicate how the resettlement activities are linked to the implementation of the overall project. 20. Costs and budget. Tables showing itemized cost estimates for all resettlement activities, including allowances for inflation, population growth, and other contingencies; timetables for expenditures; sources of funds; and arrangements for timely flow of funds, and funding for resettlement, if any, in areas outside the jurisdiction of the implementing agencies.6 21. Monitoring and evaluation. Arrangements for monitoring of resettlement activities by the implementing agency, supplemented by independent monitors as considered appropriate by the Bank, to ensure complete and objective information; performance monitoring indicators to measure inputs, outputs, and outcomes for resettlement activities; involvement of the displaced persons in the monitoring process; evaluation of the impact of resettlement for a reasonable period after all resettlement and related development activities have been completed; using the results of resettlement monitoring to guide subsequent implementation. Abbreviated Resettlement Plan 22. An abbreviated plan covers the following minimum elements:7 (a) a census survey of displaced persons and valuation of assets; (b) description of compensation and other resettlement assistance to be provided; (c) consultations with displaced people about acceptable alternatives; (d) institutional responsibility for implementation and procedures for grievance redress; (e) arrangements for monitoring and implementation; and 227 (f) a timetable and budget. Resettlement Policy Framework 23. The purpose of the policy framework is to clarify resettlement principles, organizational arrangements, and design criteria to be applied to subprojects to be prepared during project implementation (see OP 4.12, paras. 26-28). Subproject resettlement plans consistent with the policy framework subsequently are submitted to the Bank for approval after specific planning information becomes available (see OP 4.12, para. 29). 24. The resettlement policy framework covers the following elements, consistent with the provisions described in OP 4.12, paras. 2 and 4: (a) a brief description of the project and components for which land acquisition and resettlement are required, and an explanation of why a resettlement plan as described in paras. 2-21 or an abbreviated plan as described in para. 22 cannot be prepared by project appraisal; (b) principles and objectives governing resettlement preparation and implementation; (c) a description of the process for preparing and approving resettlement plans; (d) estimated population displacement and likely categories of displaced persons, to the extent feasible; (e) eligibility criteria for defining various categories of displaced persons; (f) a legal framework reviewing the fit between borrower laws and regulations and Bank policy requirements and measures proposed to bridge any gaps between them; (g) methods of valuing affected assets; (h) organizational procedures for delivery of entitlements, including, for projects involving private sector intermediaries, the responsibilities of the financial intermediary, the government, and the private developer; (i) a description of the implementation process, linking resettlement implementation to civil works; (j) a description of grievance redress mechanisms; (k) a description of the arrangements for funding resettlement, including the preparation and review of cost estimates, the flow of funds, and contingency arrangements; 228 (l) a description of mechanisms for consultations with, and participation of, displaced persons in planning, implementation, and monitoring; and (m) arrangements for monitoring by the implementing agency and, if required, by independent monitors. 25. When a resettlement policy framework is the only document that needs to be submitted as a condition of the loan, the resettlement plan to be submitted as a condition of subproject financing need not include the policy principles, entitlements, and eligibility criteria, organizational arrangements, arrangements for monitoring and evaluation, the framework for participation, and mechanisms for grievance redress set forth in the resettlement policy framework. The subproject-specific resettlement plan needs to include baseline census and socioeconomic survey information; specific compensation rates and standards; policy entitlements related to any additional impacts identified through the census or survey; description of resettlement sites and programs for improvement or restoration of livelihoods and standards of living; implementation schedule for resettlement activities; and detailed cost estimate. Process Framework 26. A process framework is prepared when Bank-supported projects may cause restrictions in access to natural resources in legally designated parks and protected areas. The purpose of the process framework is to establish a process by which members of potentially affected communities participate in design of project components, determination of measures necessary to achieve resettlement policy objectives, and implementation and monitoring of relevant project activities (see OP 4.12, paras. 7 and 31). 27. Specifically, the process framework describes participatory processes by which the following activities will be accomplished (a) Project components will be prepared and implemented. The document should briefly describe the project and components or activities that may involve new or more stringent restrictions on natural resource use. It should also describe the process by which potentially displaced persons participate in project design. (b) Criteria for eligibility of affected persons will be determined. The document should establish that potentially affected communities will be involved in identifying any adverse impacts, assessing of the significance of impacts, and establishing of the criteria for eligibility for any mitigating or compensating measures necessary. (c) Measures to assist affected persons in their efforts to improve their livelihoods or restore them, in real terms, to pre-displacement levels, while maintaining the sustainability of the park or protected area will be identified. The document should describe methods and procedures by which communities will identify and choose 229 potential mitigating or compensating measures to be provided to those adversely affected, and procedures by which adversely affected community members will decide among the options available to them. (d) Potential conflicts or grievances within or between affected communities will be resolved.The document should describe the process for resolving disputes relating to resource use restrictions that may arise between or among affected communities, and grievances that may arise from members of communities who are dissatisfied with the eligibility criteria, community planning measures, or actual implementation. Additionally, the process framework should describe arrangements relating to the following (e) Administrative and legal procedures. The document should review agreements reached regarding the process approach with relevant administrative jurisdictions and line ministries (including clear delineation for administrative and financial responsibilities under the project). (f) Monitoring arrangements. The document should review arrangements for participatory monitoring of project activities as they relate to (beneficial and adverse) impacts on persons within the project impact area, and for monitoring the effectiveness of measures taken to improve (or at minimum restore) incomes and living standards. ____________ With regard to land and structures, "replacement cost" is defined as follows: For agricultural land, it is the pre-project or pre-displacement, whichever is higher, market value of land of equal productive potential or use located in the vicinity of the affected land, plus the cost of preparing the land to levels similar to those of the affected land, plus the cost of any registration and transfer taxes. For land in urban areas, it is the pre- displacement market value of land of equal size and use, with similar or improved public infrastructure facilities and services and located in the vicinity of the affected land, plus the cost of any registration and transfer taxes. For houses and other structures, it is the market cost of the materials to build a replacement structure with an area and quality similar to or better than those of the affected structure, or to repair a partially affected structure, plus the cost of transporting building materials to the construction site, plus the cost of any labor and contractors' fees, plus the cost of any registration and transfer taxes. In determining the replacement cost, depreciation of the asset and the value of salvage materials are not taken into account, nor is the value of benefits to be derived from the project deducted from the valuation of an affected asset. Where domestic law does not meet the standard of compensation at full replacement cost, compensation under domestic law is supplemented by additional measures so as to meet the replacement cost standard. Such additional assistance is distinct from resettlement measures to be provided under other clauses in OP 4.12, para. 6. Provision of health care services, particularly for pregnant women, infants, and 230 the elderly, may be important during and after relocation to prevent increases in morbidity and mortality due to malnutrition, the psychological stress of being uprooted, and the increased risk of disease. Negative impacts that should be anticipated and mitigated include, for rural resettlement, deforestation, overgrazing, soil erosion, sanitation, and pollution; for urban resettlement, projects should address such density-related issues as transportation capacity and access to potable water, sanitation systems, and health facilities. Experience has shown that local NGOs often provide valuable assistance and ensure viable community participation. OP 4.11, Physical Cultural Resources. The costs of establishing the grievance procedures for the project shall be included in the project costs. In case some of the displaced persons lose more than 10% of their productive assets or require physical relocation, the plan also covers a socioeconomic survey and income restoration measures. 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300