RESTR I CTED .L, " itA tgU, jReport No. AS-133 This report was prepared for use within the Bank and its affiliated organizations. They do not accept responsibility for its accuracy or completeness. The report may not be published nor may it be quoted as representing their views. INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION CURRENT ECONOMIC POSITION AND PROSPECTS OF KOREA (in four volumes) VOLUME III MANUFAC TURING January 23, 1968 Asia Department CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS U.S. $1.00 = Won 270 Won 1, 000 = U.S. $3. 70 Won 1, 000, 000 = U. S. $3, 703. 70 This Report is based on the findings of a Mission which visited Korea in September 1967. The Mission was composed o-° the following members: Cornelis J.A. Jansen Chief Shu-Chin Yang General Economist Guenter H. Reif General Economist M. Shafi Niaz (FLO) Agriculture W.F. Doucet (FAO) Fisheries Jacques M. Gruot (BCEOM) Transportation This Volume was prepared by Guenter H. Reif. TABLE CF CONTENTS Volume III Manufacturing Page No. SUMIARY AND CONCLUSIONS .........*......*............. . - iii I. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ................... 1 II. USE OF LABOR AND CAPITAL ........................... III. IlvPORT SUBSTITUTION . , ............ ........... . . 8 A. Changes in Import Dependence . 8 B. Import Restrictions ..................... 10 C. Promotional M4easures . 11 IV. EXPORT PROMOTION ................... ... . 12 V. FINAiNCING ........>¢^O@.16 VI. STATUS AND PROSPECTS OF IvIAJOR INDUSTRES ............ 22 A. Investment and Intermediate Goods Industries .. 22 B. Consumer Goods Industries e 28 STATISTICAL APPENDIX (Tables 1 - 16) SU14MARY AND CONCIUSIONS 1. iManufacturing has been the most dynamic sector in Koreats economy growing about 1-6 times faster than GNP in recent years. Annual growth of gross value added accelerated from 12 percent in l962-64 to 18 percent in 1965-67 and the share of manufacturing in GNP rose to 20 percent in 1967 from only 14 percent in 1960 Investment in manufacturing, now one-third of total capital formation, is almost three times higher than in 1962-64. 2. Expanding private investments and rapidly growing exports as well as increased government investment and consumption demand stimulated growxth. Of late, domestic private consumption demand for manufactured goods also expanded because of higher per capita incomes. Although Korea's rapid industrial growth was basically the result of private entrepreneurship, it was actively promoted and guided by the government's credit policy and fiscal incentives. The cDvernment's industrialization efforts concent- rated on promoting export industries and some key import substitution sectors, like cement and fertilizers, and more recently, basic metals and petrochemicals. 3. Korean manufacturers enjoy the advantage of having an inexpensive but intelligent and hard-working labor force; it provides them with a sub- stantial cost advantage even vis-a-vis neighboring cheap-labor competitors, such as the Republic of China and Hong Kong. lanufacturing wages, however, have been increasing noticeably in recent years, although less than other urban incomes. Wage hikes for skilled labor have been particularly pro- nounced reflecting the growing demand for technical personnel. Because Korea's comparative advantage depends on the large scope for increasing the productivity of its labor force, a reform of the education system with emphasis on more'and better vocational training appears therefore indis- pensable. h. Import substitution, previously the main goal of Koreals indus- trialization,has in recent years been temporarily overshadowed by the all-out export drive, Manufactured imports rose rapidly after major import prohibitions wiere lifted in 1965. IMost pronounced has been the fast in- crease of raw materials and intermediate goods imports'and, strongly stimulated by the easy availability of foreign suppliers? credits, the large-scale imports of machinery and transport equipment. At the same time, official trade liberalization policy shifting gradually from admin- istrative to tariff restrictions made further significant progress. But despite the change from a positive to a negative list system of import controls in July 1966 and the recent fiscal reforms, some sections of Korean domestic market are still heavily protected. 5. The Second Plan reemphasizes import substitution. Large-scale investments in iron and steel, petrochemicals, fertilizer and cement have either been completed or are planned fcr the future with the aim of eliminating most of these imports by 1971. Key projects in the invest- ment plan for the rest of the Second Plan are (1) the construction of the Pohang integrated iron and steel plant and (2) the establishment of the - ii - Ulsan petrochemical complex. The technological and financial aspects of both projects are still under studre Both projects may in principle fit into a reasonable industrialization program. But in both cases, the projects will have to be further examined to ensure that economically sound industries will be established. In its import substitution policy, the Government will also have to pay more attention to the development of a competitive domestic machinery industry, whose present sluggishness is in marked contrast to the overall boom, To some extent this wzill require reduced emphasis in the financing of industrial expansion on credits connected with foreign equipment supplies. 6. The results of the Government's export promotion program for manufacturing has exceeded expectations by far, Rising much faster than total exports, the value of' manufacturing exports was in 1966 almost 15 times higher than in 1962; its share in total exports rose from less than 20 percent to almost two-thirds. Although the United States and Japan are still main customers, new markets in Asia and Europe have been pene- trated, Despite the large labor cost advantage, the export success would not have been feasible iiithout substantial Government support and sub- sidization. For the future, with export industries becoming more stabil- ized, export subsidization should be gradually reduced or applied more discriminately. This would force the enterprises to increase their competitiveness. 7. Financing of manufacturing has ccntinued to be a crucial problem. Although internal generation of funds (profit retention and depreciation) is increasing fast as manufacturing expands, financing requirements are rising even more rapidly1 Thus, need for outside fin- ance for the enterprises is becoming more urgent. With most enterprises closely held, equity financing in Korea has largely been confined to relatives and friends, The stock market, so far rather unimportant, is to be stimulated by recent fiscal reforms favoring "open" corporations and may henceforth channel more savings into equity. The growth of credit from domestic financial institutions is being delayed by severe monetary restraints under the Government's stabilization program. Special export and import credits extended to Korean exporters have become an important source of financing working capital needs. Due to the inadequacies of the organized banking system, an important unorganized market (curb market) exists where monthly interest rates of 4 percent upward are common. 8. Almost half of bank credit to manufacturing is not ext.ended by commercial banks, which provide only short-term loans up to 1 year. Long- term development financing has so far been largely provided by the Govern- mentts Korean Reconstruction Bank, (KRB),and as far as small enterprises were concerned by the Government controlled H.edium-Industry Bank (MIB). Both institutions have been playing an important part in development, but current loan requirements exceed by far their lending capacity, In view of the shortcomings in the existing financial market, the Korean Govern- ment favored the recent establishment of the Korea Development Finance Corporation (KDFC), as a privately-owned development bank. KDFC's - iii - initial capital resource wiill include an IFG capital participation, a $5 million Bank loan. The Mission agrees that a private institutional source of long-term finance such as KDIFC is necessary and thinks its business prospects are good, 9. The Mission believes that manufacturing will continue to be the leading sector in Korean development. It seems likely that the growth rate in 1967 amounted to 18-19 percent. For the rest of the Second Plan, the Economic Planning Board forecasts annual growth rates of 17-19 percent, which is an ambitious goal requiring large amounts of capital. The 11ission, however, was more skeptical assuming a growth of only 13-16 percent per year. The 'iission felt that there are some impedi- ments wJhich may restrict further growth in manufacturing. IHost important among them are: (1) the present power shortage which, despite large-scale investments, may not be fully relieved before 1969, (2) insufficient transport facilities and other infrastructure, and (3) lack of dormestic capital because of insufficient domestic savings and inadequate financial markets. 10. The Mission estimated total investment requirements in manu- facturing for the 1967-71 plan period at won 130 billion at constant 1965 prices. The calculations were based on the Govermment's invest- ment plan for 1967 and 1968, considered feasible by the Hission, and on information about future investment projects provided to the Mission. I. RECENT DEVELOPIENTS 1. Ymnufacturing has continued to be the leading sector in the development of the Korean economy. Its growth wTas 1.6 times faster than GNP growth in recent years, Annua; growth of gross value added accele- rated from 12 percent in 1962-64 1/ to 18 percent in 1965-67,. As a - result, the share of value added in manufacturing in total GNP rose from 15.6 percent during 1962-64 to about 20 percent in 1967. Expanding domestic private investment and consumption as well as increased foreign demand for Korean export goods were main reasons for the upwing. The supply of imported raw materials also improved after import credit restrictions were relaxed following the introduction of the unitariy floating exchange rate in early 1965. 2. MIajor elements in Government policy towards manufacturing have been active promotion of foreign capital inflows (both in loans and direct investments), of export industries, and of certain import substi- tute industries, such as petrochemicals, cement, basic metals, and fertilizers, which are considered key industries for further economic development. Since 1965, the Government has also pursued 1/ In discussing recent developments in manufacturing, the 1962-64 period has been selected, whenever possible, as the basic period for comparison. As pointed out in Volume I, M4ain Report, the year 1964 alone is not considered to be "normal", especially so in manu- facturing, and would therefore not provide a reasonable criterion for the trend in the past three years. In 1964 the gro%th rate of manufacturing dropped to only 4.6 percent after high rates of 15 percent and 17 percent in the two preceding years. Manufacturing activities were depressed during the year when, due to stringent government measures for the improvement of the balance of payments, imports of raw materials were drastically reduced and domestic demand declined. The tightening of the allocation of foreign exchange, the increase of the exchange rate, and the enactment of the Temporary Special Customs Tax Law put severe restrictions on imports and raised their costs. The 1964 reoession affected especially consumer goods industries such as food processing, clothing and footwear, furniture, wood and cork products where production declined reflecting the decrease in domestic consumption. In addition, basic metals and metal products, non-electrical machinery and transport equipment suffered seriously due to the shortage of imported raw materials and the slackening demand for domestic investment. On the other hand, export industries, such as textiles, benefitting from the Government's export promotion and some industries being promoted for reasons of import substitution, e.g. petrochemicals and cement, achieved noticeable expansion more than offsetting the slumps in activities in the other industries. a program of rationalizing and improving medium and small-scale industries. 3. For 1967, a very high growth rate is also expected for manu- facturing. The Economic Planning Board forecasts an increase in gross value of output by 17.4 percent and in gross value added by 19.0 percent. Economic indicators during the first half of the year show continued very rapid growth. The industrial production index, seasonally adjusted, increased 20 percent during the January - August period. However, power shortage emerging in August 1967 may have slowed down to some extent the growth of production in the last months of the year. Still a growth rate of 18-19 percent is likely. 4s Further increase in exports as a result of the stepping-up of the merchandise export target to US$350 million for 1967 (as compared with $250 million in 1966) has been a main element of the present boom. Other growth elements include (i) the expected 8 percent rise in private consumption expenditures reflecting growing purchasing power in urban households, (ii) rapidly increasing private investment demand as a result of vigorous construction activities promoted under the Second Plan, and (iii) increased Government investment and consumption demand under the 1967 budget. 5, Industrial production in 1967 was characterized by substantial increase in output of chemicals (especially fertilizers), cement and synthetic fibers following rapid expansion of production facilities. In the course of the Second Plan emphasis on these sectors will continue. 6. Small and medium sized enterprises still dominate in Korea. In 1966, about 65 percent of all employees in manufacturing worked in enter- prises with less than five employees. Those enterprises, however, produced only around 36 percent of total manufacturing output. In order to improve the structure and competitive position of small industries, the Small Industry Basic Act was promulgated in December 1966. The Act emphasizes not only promotional measur'es on the part of the Government but also self- help efforts by small entrepreneurs. Major policies endorsed by the legisla- tion include rationalization and education of management, introduction of new production techniques, quality improvement; improvement of working conditions and modernization of production facilities. The development of industrial estates and cooperatives will be promoted. In addition, small industries are to be converted into export industries at a faster pace. For these improvements the Government is to give priority financing and special tax privileges. - 3 - Table 1 Percentage Increases in Gross Value Added In iEning, Manufacturing,, Constrction and Power (at 1965 constant market prices) 1/ 2/ 2/ Annual 1965 1966 1967 1968 Average 1962-64 Mining 14.8 10.7 6,4 14.4 10.3 Coal mining 7 17 12.1 Other mining 12.1 6X1 14.0 16.9 12.4 Manufacturing 1201 15.1 16.1 19.0 17.1 Food 5:7 75 137 5.2 7.5 Beverage and tobacco 2,3 17.7 22.0 1h.6 12.4 Textile industry 10.9 21.4 10.6 10.7 10.7 Footwear and Clothing 5.8 -3.1 -0.2 7.8 8.1 Lumber and plywood, wood products, except- furniture 20.5 10.8 31.9 7.0 16.4 Paper and pulp 24.2 10.2 18.3 12.6 12.4 Printing, publishing and allied industries 19.6 16.4 19.7 20.0 20.1 Leather and leather products except footwear 3.3 3.9 9.3 9.4 10.3 Rubber products 13.1 17.1 3.1 6.1 6.6 Fertilizer 29.7 23.6 5.9 355.1 36.7 Other chemicals 27.5 -1.5 21.8 13.6 13.7 Refined oil - - 29.3 59.4 79.8 Other petrochemicals 42.5 h9.0 22.4 19.9 19.9 Cement )38.7) 4140) Clay, stone, glass products)27-0 21.5 13.7 149)24.0 15.2)26.2 Basic metal industries, metal products, except machinery and transport equipment 18.5 16.2 13.5 15.7 16.0 Machinery, other than electrical 5.4 1.h 0.5 10.0 10.0 Electrical machinery, appliances and supplies 44.8 19.2 55.8 47.7 4°.3 Transport equipment 13.5 18.2 38.2 25.1 17.8 Other manufacturing 11.0 5.2 ll17 16.5 16.5 Construction 11.0 16.8 26.0 26.6 1565 Power (Electricity and Gas) 19.7 20.0 20.8 32.0 =2. 1/ 1965 figures represent changes over 1962-64 arithmetic means at compounded rate for two years. 2/ Forecasts by EPB in ORB 1968. Source: Bank of Korea; 1967 and 1968 figures F,6&nomic Planning Board. -4- II USE OF TLAEOR, AND CAPTPAL 7. Korean manufacturers enjoy the comparative advantage of having a cheap, but at the same time intelligent and hard-working labor force. Labor costs have in recent years never exceeded 12 percent of total manufacturing costs. In addition., the Goverrment has kept prices low for imported capital goods (especially in the case of priority industries), and for raw materials and intermediate goods used for the production of export goods, by permitting duty-free irmPorts or imports at a preferential tariff. On the other hand, domestic capital has been scarce and very costly as reflected in the high interest rate level. Table 2 Composition of Hanufacturklv Costs (%) IYlaterial 1/ Personnel 2/ Other Costs _&p.enses Ex_rses 1962 5G.5 9.3 10.2 1963 76.8 11.6 11.6 1964 73.i-. u 11.5 15.1 1965 77.1 10.2 12.7 1966 73.2 9.6 12.2 1/ Direct and indirect material costs and purchased partki 2/ Direct and indirect labor costs and processing costs for outside orders. Source: Bank of Ks)rea, Financial Statements Analysis. 8. Employment in manufacturing increased 36% between 1963 and 1966 as a result of rapid industrial expansion. 1T'ile share of employees working in the manufacturing sector in total economically active population rose from 7.31% in 1963 to only 9.2% in 1966. in the last two years nomainal wages in manufacturing have increased by 16.8% per year over the 1962-64 average (Statistical Appendix Table 5). Wage rises mera particularly high in wood and cork products (23%), electrical machirnery (22%) and chemicals (20%) where the number of skilled and semi-skilled workers increased with the introduction of more sophisticated production Lines. - 5 - In contrast, wage increases were very low in the paper, leather and rubber industries. Wages in textile industry increased by about 18% from a fairly low base. Before 1965, increases in nominal wages tended to be offset by rapidly rising costs of living. Real wages, in fact, declined for several years although labor productivity showed a rising tendency (Statistical Appendix Tahle 6) Ini 1966, however, real wages rose by about 4?3, due mainly to a discernible slow-down of price inflation, 9. The overall low wage level has provided Korea with a substantial cost advantage vis-a-vis neighboring competitor countries in the Far East. The table below attempts to present an international comparison of manu- facturing wages for 1965. It shows that monthly earnings were less than 60% of those paid in the Republic of China (Taiwan) and only one-third of those in Hong Kong. The 'wage level in Japan wJas almost six times higher than in Korea. In 1966, wages have risen in Korea faster than in Taiwan, reducing somewhat the Korean advantage. In all four countries the wages shown include bonuses, overtime pay and other allowances which differ among countries and may be quite substantial in some sectors. Table 3 Average Monthly Wages in Manufacturing 1965 (in US$) Korea $17.41 China (Taiwan) $29.95 Hong Kong $5'¢.° Japan $100.29 Source: ILO - Yearbook of Labor Statistics, 1966. 10. Comparison with the Republic of China (Taiwan) and Japan 1/ by industries (Statistical Appendix Table7 ) in 1965 reveals t1>et in Korea and Taiwan the difference between high and low wage sectoro was much smaller than in Japan. Korean wages were conspicuously low in non-electrical machinery, textiles, food and also chemical industries but high in basic metals, printing and beverages. It is interesting that in some sectors the advantage of Korea as compared to Taiwan is less than one would expect. This is particularly so in the case of some typical export industries with high female lebor contents in both countries, such as electronics and textiles. In these industries the difference between Taiwanese female wages and total Korean wages is negligible. 1/ Data for Hong Kong were not available. -6- 11. Fixed capital formation in manufacturing has expanded con- siderably in the course of Koreals determined industrialization efforts. The share of fixed investment in manufacturing to total investment increased rapidly from 23 percent in 1962-64 to 32 percent in 1966. Table 4 Gross Fixed Capital Formation in Manufacturing (1965 constant prices) Average 1962-64 1965 1966 Fixed capital formation (billion won) 21.4 30.5 61.7 Percentage of fixed capital formation in manufacturing to total domestic fixed capital formation ( ) 22.6 25.9 32.h For comparison: Agriculture and forestry 8.5 10.0 7.3 Public utilities l/ 10.3 6.o 5.0 Transport 2/ - 22.7 20.5 2h.6 Incremental capital output ratio 1.89 1.17 2.69 Average 1962-66 1.89 1/ Power, gas, water supply and sanitation. ./ Transportation, communication and storage. Source: Salculated on the basis of Bank of Korea and Economic Planning Moard ta is ics. 12. The average incremental capital output ratio for the 1962-66 period was fairly low, owing to emphasis on less capital intensive industries. In addition, construction costs have so far been comparatively low in Korea due to cheap local labor and rather short construction periods because predominantly small- and medium sized plants were established. The trends has changed since 1966 when the capital uutput ratio rose to 2.69 with the concentration on large-scale, more capital intensive industries. This trend will continue as the industrialization program in the Second Plan is being implemented. 13. Another factor contributing to a relatively low level of the capital output ratio until 1966 was the increase in the utilization of productive capacity during those years. According to statistics of the Bank of Korea, utilization of capacity in manufacturing was low during the early 1960's but has been increasing steadily since 1964 - 7 - (see Statistical Appendix Tab-e 8).l/ Capacity utilization rose frcm 55 percent in 1964 to 74 percent in 1966, owing to overall industrial boom and rapid rise in >inal demand, although many new plants were added and existing facilities expanded. In the first five months of 1967, the utilization rate however fell slightly, due mainly to seasunal factors. In addition, new large-scale petroleum fertilizer, metal and cement plants had not yet reached full production. 1/ Utilization rates prepared by the Bank of Korea are useful as indicators for business trends and as such reflect rather realistically recent developments. However, the rates hardly provide exact information on the absolute level of utilization since the term of irstalled production capacity is rather im,precise and the definition used by various enterprises appears to differ. Absolute capacity figures are more accurate in the case of newly established capital intensive enterprises, e.g. fertilizer,3-cement, refined oil, synthetic fibre plants, where capacities are well known. The figures are more questionable in the case of older, labor intensive industries, such as rubber shoes, soap, food processing, bicycles, etc. which appear particularly affected by underutilization. The Bank of Korea obtains annual capacity data from various producers' assocjations concerned on the assumption of physical maximum use of major equip- ment, disregarding the economically optimal combinatiLon of labor and capital. Obsolete and inefficient capacities are included in idle capacities in several sectors, thus overstating underutilization. In some cases, however, lowi utilization reflects glaring overinvest- ment in previous years (flour mills7 sugar refineries. bicycle plants), -.8- III. IMPCRT SUBSTITUTION 14. In the late 1950's and early 1960's, the main goal of Korean industrialization was import substitution in order to improve the balance of payments. This was reflected in the First Five-Year Plan. In recent years emphasis has shifted to export promotion. Of late, however, import substitution in some basic materials has been regaining prominence. The rise in overall imports since the relaxation of controls in 1964 was accompanied by even faster increase of manufactured goods imports. In 1966, manufactured imports rose by 73% and accounted for 62% of total imports. Most pronounced was the growth of imports in chemicals, inter- mediate goods for textile industry, iron and steel, and machinery, including transport equipment (see Statistical Appendix Table 9). A. Changes in Import Dependence 15. Market dependence on manufactured imports expressed as share of imports in total supply also rose from 15°o in 1965 to 19% in 1966, after passing a low in 1964 (Statistical Appendix Table 10). The degree of import dependence was especially high in the case of machinery, e.g. 6-6% in non-electrical machinery supply in 1966. Due to rapid increase in domestic production, however, import dependence on chemicals and textiles (excluding finished products) rose only slightly, although imports increased. 16. The Second Plan reemphasizes import substitution, this time in the fields of basic materials, in contrast with consumers' manufactured goods before the early 1960's. Large-scale investments in basic metals, cement. fertilizers,and petrochemicals are planned with the aim of eliminating imports of such products by 1971. An important development has been the upward trend of imports of industrial inputs. With expanding industrial production, some increase had to be expected. In fact,the increase in imports of raw materials and manufactured intermediate goods was still rather moderate in 1965 compared with the 1962-64 average. (A comparison with 1964 alone would not be realistic since stocks of raw materials were replenished on a large scale during 1965 following the very tight import restrictions of 1964.) In 1966, however, imports of raw materials and intermediate products sarged upward dramatically, exceeding by far the growth of manufacturing output, and for 1967 another increase by 40% is expected. About 20% of the 1966 increase may be attributed to rising imports of construction materials, such as cement and steel products, caused by the construction boom, and another 10% may have been the result of higher fuel purchases abroad to meet the growing needs of the transportation and power sectors. But the balance appears to indicate that domestic production of finished goods has been grow-ing faster in 1966 than domestic output of intermediate goods. One main cause of the increase may have been the priority given to industries producing finished goods for exports. In addition, rising income and consumption level has stimulated production of finished consumption goods for the domestic markets. Another important element - 9- Table 5 Industrial Production and Imports 1962-64 19651/ 1966 Gross Value of Manufacturing Output (million US$ at current prices) 2/ 1,270.0 1,722.1 2,163.9 Growth (%) +16.5% +25.7% Total Imports (million US$) 4k62.2 463.4 716.4 Growth (%) . 0.1% 54.6% Imports of Raw Materials and Intermediates (million US$) 272.7 319.4 464.7 Growth (%)- - 8.2% 45.5% Imports of Machinery and Equipment (million US$) 85.o 73.5 171.7 Growth (%) _ -7.0% 133.6% 1/ Growth over 1962-64 arithmetic means at compounded rate for two years. 2/ Conversion rates: 1962 $1 = 157.0 w 4 Exchange rates used by 1963 $1 = 189.0 W 1966 IBRD Report. 1965 $1 = 265 9 , ) Rates applied in revised 1966 $1 271.3 W ) Korean national accounts Sources: Economic Planning Board and Bank of Korea. in the import pattern has been the rapidly growing domestic demand for investment goods reflected in the extremely high growth of imports of machinery and transport equipment in recent years. The Government tries to reduce these imports by expanding the small domestic machine tool industry and by encouraging assembly plants for engines, auto- mobiles and railroad rolling stock. There is no doubt that Korean machinery industry could ccntribute more to domestic supply, but the lack of domestic credit and a large volume of foreign suppliers' credits have hampered development of domestic machinery industry. 17. The Korean Government has in the past afforded domestic industry almost full protection against foreign competition by import ban sor prohibitive tariffs and has supported local production by an array of promotional measures, including tax exemptions and preferential credit. Import restrictions have, of course, not only been used to protect the local market but also to ward off undesirable _ 10 - and unnecessary imports for balance of payments reasons. But the protective component has been considerable. Despite important steps taken towards trade liberalization, especially the change from a positive to a negative list system of import controls in July 1967, Korean domestic market is still rather restricted to foreign goods. B. Import Restrictions 18. Restrictive measures include quotas, prohibition, tariffs and commodity taxes. Prohibitions and quota restrictions,which played a key role in the past, have become less important since 1965. Imports under quota restrictions now cover only about 13 percent of total import value. At the same time the number of items on the prohibited list has continuously been reduced since 1965, by transfer to the restricted or automatic approval lists. In mid-1967, there were only 64 items left on the prohibited list as compared to 620 at the end of 1965 (see Statistical Appendix Table 11). Significant items taken off the list include all machinery and transport equipment, galvanized iron sheets, nails, plywood, tires, and almost all chemicals and pharmaceuticals. On the other hand, textile, clothing and footwear industries remained fully under the protective umbrella. 19. With introduction of the negative list system in 1967, the list of restricted items in the import plan for the second half of 1967 was reduced to 321 items, which may be imported only with the approval of the Ministry of Commerce and Industry. Most of the items eliminated from the prohibited list reappeared on the restricted list, including plywood, iron and steel products, many essential chemicals, machinery, and transport equipment. In the past, main criteria for restricting imports had been whether (a) the goods were already being manufactured in Korea, (b) local prices were not too high compared with world market prices, and (c) technology was not obsolete. The future degree of protection by quantitative restrictions will depend on how liberally the approval system will be. applied. 20. Commodity tax has been imposed on a growing number of products with the main purpose of earning revenues and discouraging domestic luxury consumption. Rates range between 30-70% on finished industrial goods of luxury character, coffee and soft drinks; rates are lower (between 2-20%) on materials and intermediate goods and on mass consumption commodities. Although the tax affects both locally produced and imported goods, it has a strong restrictive effect on imports, since most of the luxury items ccme from abroad. In some cases, e.g. certain textiles, where commodity tax has been imposed on imported goods only, the tax has been clearly protectionist. Reform of the commodity tax in November 1967 (see Appendix on Fiscal Reform in the Main Report) is a further attempt to discourage imports and local production of luxury goods. - 11 - 21. Tariff (including the "special customs duty") rates are highest on consumer goods, lower on intermediary products and lowest on unprocessed materials and investment goods. Because of many exemptions, actual tariff rates are far below nominal rates. As a result only slightly more than one-half of the tariff revenues was actually collected in 1966. For manufactured goods, it was only about 44%. Statistical Appendix Table 12 shows tariff exemption rates by major commodities. The high exemption rate is primarily caused (1) by exempting imported inputs used for export production and (2) by granting exemptions to imports of vital investment goods. The latter explains the very high tariff exemption rate of machinery, transport equipment, and non-metallic minerals (including cement). The resulting low protection, especially for domestic machinery industries, has impeded considerably the growth of these industries inducing substantial additional imports during the present boom. 22. The tariff reform passed recently by Parliament revises the protective features of the tariff structure, the details of which are analyzed in the Appendix on Fiscal Reform in the Main Report. C. Promotional Yieasures 23. Allocation of credits has been an important instrument in promoting import substitution. The Government required the banking system - which is either Oovernment owned or Government controlled - to gear its lending policy to the priorities of developm,ent. Foreign suppliers' credits are controlled through the approval of the National Assembly in granting repayment guarantees issued by the banks. In addition, Government exercises direct control over foreign official aid. As a result of the domestic credit allocation policy of the Government the Korean Reconstruction Bank - the main source of industrial finance in Korea -- extended 27% of its new loans in 1966 to the textile sector, and 25% to chemicals, non-metallic minerals, basic metals and metal product industries (for details see Chapter V of this Appendix). - 12 - IV. EXPORT PROMOTION 24. Main element in Korea's spectacular export performance has been the fast expansion of manufacturing exports, which (excluding some processed agricultural products) accounted for 61 percent of total exports in 1966 as comlpared to less than 20 percent in 1962 (see Statistical Appendix Table 13). Major exports are textiles, clothing,and veneer sheets, together accounting for 56 percent of total manufacturing exports in 1966. But new items have been constantly added to the export list. These include electrical appliances and equipment, light industry products, tools and some less sophisticated machinery, more recently also human hair and wigs ($15.5 million in 1966). As a result the commodity pattern of exports became increasingly diversified. 25. The main market for Korean manufacturing products is tie United States, purchasing one-half of these exports (see Statistical Appendix Table 14), which in 1966 bought almost 40 percent of Korean textile and clothing exports, 50 percent of the electrical machinery, 90 percent of the veneer sheets and 94 percent of the human hair and wig exports. Although total Korean exports to the United States is less than 0.3 percent of U.S. imports, the present heavy reliance on the U.S. market 1.968. Table 3 Manufaatur in Composition of Gross Value Added by Sector (Percent) (at corstaint 1965 market j es) Average1// 1962-1964 1965 1966 19671/ 1968-' Investment Goods: 14.7 1*.3 iS.5 16.1 16.8 Basic metal industries and metal products 5.3 5.4 5.3 5.1 5.1 Machinery other than electric 3.4 2.6 2.3 2.1 2.0 Electrical machinery 2.1 2.2 3.0 3.7 4.5 Transport equipment 3.9 4.1 4.9 5.2 5.2 Intermediate Goods: 18.0 18.3 18.6 22.3 24.8 Cement, clay, stone and glass products 3.9 4.4 4.3 LL.4 4.8 Lumber, plywood, wood products 2.6 2.4 2.7 2.5 265 Paper and pulp 2.7 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.3 Fertilizer 1.1 1.3 1.2 465 5.3 Other chemicals 4.8 3.5 3.6 365 3.4 Leather products (except footwear) 0.8 0.7 o.6 0o0 065 Refined oil - 1.9 2.2 2.9 4.4 Other petrochemicals and coal products 2.1 1.6 1.5 165 1.6 Consumer Goods: 64.3 64.8 63.4 59.0 56.1 Food 13.3 11.7 1165 10.1 9.3 Beverages and tobacco 13.2 13.8 14.5 14.0 13.4 Textiles 25.6 28.5 27.1 25.2 23.9 Clothing and footwear 5.3 3.8 3.3 2.9 2.7 Printing and publishing hL7 4.8 5.0 5.0 5.2 Rubber products 2.2 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 Total 2ianufacturing21 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 -/Forecasts by EPB in ORB 1968. 2/ - Including other manufacturing not classified above. Source: Bank of Korea; Economic Planning Board for 1967 and 1968. Table 4 Industrial Production Index (Average 1962-6)4=100) -Average Weight 1962-64 1965 1966 Mining lOQ.0 100.0 115.3 127.8 Coal 62.8 100.0 114.3 129.5 Metal 21.6 100.0 99.9 108.0 Non-Metal 15.6 100.0 118.1 122.9 Manu-facturing 100l 100.0 130.9 154.3 Food 8.5 100.0 104.9 129.7 Beverages 5.0 100.0 133.5 160.5 Tobacco 6.9 100.0 154.8 161.0 Textiles 19.3 100.0 138.1 153.4 Clothing and footwTear 3.5 - (100.0) ( 96.5) Wood and cork 4.3 100.0 110.0 146.6 Furniture and fixture 0.8 - (100.0) (103.8) Paper and paper products 3.7 100.0 114.2 132.1 Printing and publishing 4.2 100.0 137.4 169.5 Leather and its products 0.6 100.0 107.5 128.5 Rubber products 3.1 100.0 119.3 121.0 Chemicals 8.8 100.0) 123.5 147.6 Petrochemicals 4.9 10O.C 188.3 234.1 Glass, clay and stone 6.6 10O.G 143.1 168.4 Basic metals 4.8 100.0 105.6 126.0 Metal products 2.6 100.0 110.2 124.9 Machinery other than electrical 3.J4 100.0 94.3 95.8 Electrical machinery 2.8 100.0 111.9 150.7 Transport equipment 4.3 100.0 186.9 300.0 YIscellaneous 1.9 100.0 98.0 120.5 Power 100.0 100.0 141.6 169.4 Note: Weights of Secondary Industry 100.0 Mining 10.5 Manufacturing 85.3 Power 6.2 Source: Bank of Korea, Monthly Statistical Review. 2 - An Explanatory Note on Revised Production Index 1. A revised industrial production was introduced by the Bank of Korea in early 1967. The new index uses the 1965 average as base; the previous series was based on 1960. The index covers mining, manufacturing and electricity; however, as in the previous index, construction has been excluded due to technical difficulties. Reflecting the significant changes in industrial structure since 1960, the number of items in the monthly series has been increased from 269 to 278 and classifications have been modernized. In addition to the basic classifications, three special groupings for the manufacturing index have been introduced, namely export versus domestic oriented industries, producer versus consumer goods industries, and heavy versus light industries. 2. The revised data show marked increases in the weights for manufac- turing and power, but reduced weights for mining. The higher level for manufacturing is mainly due to the inclusion of a great number of new prod- ucts and the higher weights for chemicals, petrochemicals, basic metals, electric machinery and transport equipment. 3. For establishing the weights, revised GNP data were used as no census was taken in 1965. The 1965 net value added figures were derived by subtracting from gross value of production the cost of raw materials, fuel, power and contract work and adjustments were made to deduct indirect taxes. The computation, however, neglects Government subsidies. 4. It should be noted that the revised gross value and value added figures used for the compilation of the new industrial production index differ from the figures shown for the various industries in the revised national accounts series. In contrast to GNP calculations, the Bank of Korea - for practical reasons - did not completely follow the SITC classi- fication. To ensure that the production index reflects more truly the trend in manufacturing activities some processed agricultural products (e.g. slaughtered animals, straw products, salted marine products, bean sprouts, grass floor coverings, etc.) were excluded from the manufacturing sector. 5. The Korean Reconstruction Bank has also changed the base year of its production index from 1960 to 1965. The index is based on the mining and manufacturing censuses of 1960 and 1963 followed by estimates derived from sample surveys. It covers only industrial establishments employing five or more persons. Furthermore, the KRB conducts its survey at the industrial establishment level while BOK takes the approach by commodity. At the aggregate level the KRB index is not much different from the BOK index; differences, however, become more conspicuous at the 2-digit indus- try level. When the results of the 1966 census will be available, further revision of both indices may become necessary. Table 5 lonthly Earnings and iMIan-Days of Production liorkers _In 14'ining and ianufacturine Average 1562-1964 1965 1566 Earnings Ilan-days Earnings M.an-days Earnings Nan-days Mining 5,611 2L .6 7,680 25.0 8,920 26.9 Coal 6,257 24.5 9.010 25,1 10,480 27.5 Yletals 4,843 26.5 6,220 27.2 7,170 27.1 Non-metals 2,837 22.3 4,030 23.4 4,870 25.1 Manuf~~ina 21.8 4,700 24. 5430 25.3 Fvo0d 3,170 21.5 4,380 20.0 5,400 23.8 Beverage 4,657 26.0 6,160 25.5 7,380 26.6 Textile products 2,?10 25.2 4,160 25.3 4,790 25.3 Wood and cork products 3,723 24.0 5,850 23.4 6,860 23.8 Paper and its prodtucts It,430 26.5 5,510 26.9 5,740 26.6 Printiig and publishing 5,463 27.6 6,500 27.7 8,350 27.4 Leather and its products 2,760 24.5 3,590 24.1 3,500 23.5 Rubber products 3,473 24.3 bi,920 2)4.8 5,o60 25.7 Chemicals 3,103 24.4 4,510 24.0 5,380 24.2 Petroleum and coal products 3,867 26.7 5,470 27.0 6,160 26.7 Glass, clay and stone products 4,310 25.8 5,620 27.2 6,9oo 24.5 Basic metals 5,237 25.7 7,260 25.7 8,020 25.6 Mietal products 3,273 23.6 4,470 23.8 5,410 24.3 Miachinery 2,870 25.8 3,750 26.8 4,510 26.0 Electrical machinery 3,420 25.1 4,720 25.4 6,250 25.1 Transport equipment 4,020 25.3 4,970 23.8 5,770 21.7 Idiscellaneous 2,387 23.1 2,980 24.7 3,490 24.7 Source: Batk of Korea, Monthly Statistical Review, June 1967, Table 6 1/ Trends of Labor Prodtuctivity-and Real Money Wages in Manufacturing, bSecZor (1962 - 1964 = 100) 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 Total Labor Productivity 93.0 99.1 107.9 J26.7 129.3 Real Money 'Wages 108.0 99.1 92.9 95.7 99.4 Food Labor Productivity 101.7 106.4 91.9 130.1 104.2 Real Money Wages 111.8 98.7 89.3 93.9 l05.4 Beverage Labor Productivity 111.9 93.3 94.8 136.3 136.7 Real Money Wgages 109.4 98.9 91.7 92.4 98.6 Textiles Labor Productivity 98.2 94.2 107.6 136.1 129.8 Real Money Wages 105.3 100o14 91.3 100.24 102.9 Lumber, Plywood & Wzhood Products Labor Productivity 102.3 113.2 84.5 9810 104.0 Real Money Wages 98.5 102.0 99.5 111.3 116.1 Paper and Pulp Labor Productivity 86.3 104.5 109.2 106.5 105.8 Real honey W4ages 110.9 92.9 96.2 87.2 80.8 Printing and Publishing Labor Productivity 88.1 93.7 118.2 1241.8 180.0 Real Money Wages 1124.4 100.2 85.4 86.8 93.6 Leather Products (except Tootwear) Labor Productivity 99.8 96.1 104.1 109.8 113.4 Real Money Wages 1'6.6 90.2 93.2 90.6 78.6 Rubber Products Labor Productivity 85.1 106.1 108.8 114.5 85.5 Real Money W,Iages 105.0 94.8 100.2 100.1 91.6 Chemical (including Fertilizer) Labor Productivity 80.4 104.1 115.5 121.1 132.9 Real Money Wages 106.9 92.6 100.5 102.6 108.8 (Continued on next page) Table 6 (Cont'd) 1/ Trends of Labor Productivity and Real Money W,,!ages in Mqanuifacturi-ng5 byv Sector (1962 - 1964 = 100) 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 Petrochemical & Coal Products Labor Productivity 67.7 90.7 141.6 204.3 236.0 Real Money lWlages 105.7 103.3 91.0 99.0 99.3 Cement, Clay, Stone & Glass Products Labor Productivity 90.5 88.7 120.8 128.3 161.9 Real Money W,Jages 110.7 99.9 89.4 90.9 99.3 Basic Metals Labor Productivity 91.3 96.2 112.5 97KO 109.4 Real Money WTages 109.4 96.4 9h.2 97.1 95.6 Metal Products Labor Productivity 96.7 121.5 81.8 104.2 116.8 Real Money Wages 109.2 98,1 92.7 95.6 103.0 Machinery (other than Electrical) Labor Productivity 121.7 88.7 89.6 98.9 83.9 Real Money W^ages 110O4 99.0 90.6 91.2 97.6 Electrical Machinery Labor Productivity 90.3 98.8 110.9 87.3 87.4 Real Monev Wages 99.7 98.1 102.2 98.0 115.5 Transport Equipment Labor Productivity 72.5 105.9 121.6 167.6 173.2 Real Money Wages 106.6 103.3 90.1 85.9 88.7 Not Elsewhere Classified Labor Productivity 95.5 109.1 95.4 99.9 102.5 Real Money Wages 113.1 99.8 87.1 86.o 89.5 1/ Net production per man-day; wage earners only. Source: Productivity: Korea Productivity Ceniter, Labor Productivity -ndex, Seoul. IWages: Bank of Korea, Monthly Statistical Review, Seoul Deflator - Seoul Consumer Price Indewx. Table 7 Average Monthly E Branch of Yanufacturins/ in 1965 in Kore eRe. of China (Taiwan) andJapa (in US$) Korea TaiwanZ/ Taiwan_/ Japan (male) (female) Industry Food 16.22 47.25 27.50 89.841/ Beverages 22.81 33.25 31.75 Textiles 15.41 26.75 17.55 69.63 Luaber, plywood and wood products 21.67 24.75 18.45 75.23 Paper and pulp 20.41 28.25 21.12 1o4.98 Printing and publishing 25.56 31.50 25.75 132.33 Rubber products 18.22 38.25 16.00 89.12 Chemicals 16.70 32.25 16.82 122.47 Petrochemicals and coal products 20.26 38.25 1.-75 145.87 Cement, clay, stone and glass products 20.81 - - 101.95 Basic metal 26.89 34.25 18.05 136.89 Metal products 16.56 - - 97.59 Nachinery (other than electrical) 13.89 36.50 21.02 107.12 Electrical machinery 17.48 30.75 18.75 89.12 Transport equipment 18.41 36.50 20.82 121.61 1/ Including family allowfances. 2/ Based on 25 working days per month. 3/ Food and beverages are combined. Note: The exchange rates are as follows: Korea - 1US$ = 270 Wqon Japan - 1US$ = 360 Yen Taiwan - lUS$ -40 N.T.$ Source: ILO - Yearbook of Labour Statistics, 1966. Table 8 Rates of Capacity Utilization in Major Industries-/ In Percentage (%) 196L 1965 1966 1962/ Low Rate: Soap 52.4 40.9 27.7 30.7 Paint 18.7 23.2 30.3 33.6 Wheat Flour 275 35.14 30.8 52.0 Refined Sugar 7.0 18.4 30.8 L45.6 Bicycles 25.8 25.0 35.8 21.8 Rubber Shoes 80.3 83.5 41.2 28.0 Ethyl Alcohol 17.6 27.6 143.14 56.9 Industrial Explosives 30.8 38.3 45.8 50.0 Galvanized Iron Sheet - - 47.6 ;6.7 Medium Rate: Cotton Fabrics 60.8 66.9 53.5 5L.3 Rayon Fabrics 73.0 94.5 55.6 60.5 Pig Iron 2.0 45.4 56.1 34.7 Woolen and IWorsted Yarn - - 60.2 33.5 Steel Ingots 43.7 65.1 67.6 71.5 Sneakers - - 68.1 60.o High Rate: Cotton Yarn 79.5 79.2 72.9 77.8 Cement 72.7 93.8 87.0 86.9 Automobile Tires 52.8 74.1 92.1 103.3 Flat Glass 93.3 90.2 95.3 88.9 Steel Bar and Reinforcing Bars 50.5 62.3 96.4 101.8 Electrolytic Copper 107.7 88.5 96.7 96.0 Newsprint 80.8 83.5 97.9 101o4.1 Urea Fertilizer 83.0 95.9 101.5 100.8 Plywood 91.2 81.0 107.0 109.2 Refined Oil 143.7 92.1 111.6 66.2 Nylon Yarn 7.7 106.3 130.8 76.8 Viscose Rayon Yarn - - - 53.5 Average3. 55.14 69.7 73.8 63.5 1/ Classified according to capital ut,ilization in 1966. 2/ January - May. 7/ The average rate of utilization is computed by arithmetic mean wzeighted weighted with composition rate of value added. Source: Bank of Korea, Review of Korean Economy 1964 and 1965, and data a supplied to the Mission. Table 9 1/ Imports of-74anuractured Goods Percent Share in Total Imports (11illion US$) SITC Code Commodities 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 5 Chemicals 94.31 79.98 84.34 103.42 134.55 22.4 14.3 20.9 23.0 18.8 62 Rubber Products .33 .86 .26 .32 .43 .1 .2 .1 .1 .1 63 Wood & Cork Products .11 .11 .15 .08 .20 - - - - - 64 Paper & Paperboard 3.64 2.25 1.91 1.52 3.52 .9 .4 .5 .3 .5 65 Textiles 28.80 29.51 19.64 26.92 4L5.16 6.8 5.3 4.9 6.o 6.3 66 Non-Metallic Minerals 5.84 6.98 2.07 1.48 6.09 1.4 1.2 .5 .3 .9 67 Iron & Steel 22.62 32.46 14.84 24.74 39.53 5.4 5.8 3.7 5.5 5.5 6a Non-Ferrous Metals 6.82 8.47 4.18 (8.96 11.16 1.6 1.5 1.0 2.0 i.6 69 Other M4etal Manufactures 4.92 7.68 2.99 7.08 18.81 1.2 1.4 .7 1.6 2.6 71 Non-Electrical M1achinery 34.t45 61.94 38.21 35.34 95.64 8.2 11.1 9.4 7.9 13.3 72 Electrical Machinery 28.71 22.33 19.68 12.61 26.09 6.8 4.0 4.9 2.8 3.6 73 Transport Equipment 6.62 31.30 11.62 25.19 49.99 1.6 5.6 2.9 5.6 7.0 84 Clothing .21 .32 .23 .45 .48 .1 .1 .1 .1 85 Footwear .02 .09 .01 .03 .05 - - - - - 86 Professional, Scientific & Controlling Instrunent 6.39 4.85 2.65 3.88 5.43 1.5 .9 .7 .9 .8 Miscellaneous Manufactures 3.64 2.78 2. 2 2.57 4.80 .9 .5 .6 .6 .7 Total Manufactures 247.43 291.91 205.30 255.59 4411.93 58.7 52.1 50.8 56.8 61.7 Total Imports 421.78 560.27 404.35 449.95 716.44 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 1 Not including agricultural goods with sorme processing, such as refined sugar and raw silk, and mining products. Source: Bank of Korea, Monthly Statistical Review, 1964, 1966, 1967. Table 10- Market Dependence on Imports (Share of osinTerent j TotSupply 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 Investment Goods Basic Metal 39.2 40.9 22.5 27.6 32.5 M4etal Products (except machinery and transport equipment)16.0 21.3 9.8 16.8 30.2 Piachinery (other than electrical) 46.1 64.2 53.7 1<8.9 65.5 Electrical Machinery 57.7 4o.0 33.7 22.8 26.1 Transport Equipment 16.0 39.8 21.1 30.3 35.2 Intermediate Goods Non-IHietallic Mineral Products 12.8 14.4 3.5 2.3 7.2 WIood and Cork Products except Furniture .3 .2 .3 .1 .2 Paper and Paper Products 10.6 5.7 4.1 3.1 5.3 Chemicals and Chemical Products 61.2 48.5 44.8 52.2 53.3 Leather and Leather Products .2 .1 .6 1.4 1.9 Products of Petroleum and Coal 43.7 39.9 26.9 25.5 27.3 Consumer Goods Food 2.7 3.7 3.8 5.2 4.9 Beverages and Tobacco 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 Textiles 11.8 11.8 6.4 6.2 7.9 Clothing and Footwojear .3 .5 .3 .6 .5 Printing and Publishing - - - - - Rubber Products 1.2 2.8 .6 .5 .9 Furniture 1.1 1.3 1.9 0.7 1.3 Total Manufacturing 20.3 21.2 14.2 14.9 18.9 l/Total supply = gross value of output at current prices. For converting import figures the following exchange rates were used: 1962 $1 = 157.0 '.) Exchange rates used 1963 $1 = 189.0 le-) by 1966 IBRD Report 1964 $1 = 225.9 7H-) Rates applied in revised 1965 $1 = 265AL Hw-) national accounts 1966 $1 = 271.3 'f-) Source: Bank of Korea, Mlonthly Statistical Revie-ws, 196h, 1966, 1967, and revised national accounts data received by Mission. Table 11 List of Prohibited Imports Ju-ly-Decemner U6t7~ (Pri1cipaJ Items) Basic metals and metal products: Magnesite, cast iron tubes and pipes, knives, cutlery handles, picture frames, metal mirrors. Paper products: Wallpaper and lincrusta, filling containers, almost all kinds of stationery. Chemicals: Ethyl alcohol, mining blasting and safety fuses. Leather products:. Leather parts of footwear; all leather or composition leather products, except industrial appliances. Food: Condensed and evaporated milk and cream, prepared or preserved meat products, sausages, tapioca and sago, sugar confectionery, chocolate, green peanuts. Textiles: Cotton, silk, jute, woolen, rayon, synthetic fabrics; cotton, woolen, worsted, jute, synthetic yarns; paper yarns. Clothing and footwear: All footwear, clothing of textile fabrics, clothing accessories of textile fabrics.,including knitted and crocheted fabrics. Rubber products: Plates, sheets and strips of unvulcanized natural or synthetic rubber. Others: Jewelry (worked or unworked), matches, unbrellas and sunshades, corsets, non-mechanical fans. Source: Ministry of Commerce and Industry. Table 12 Korean Tariff Rates for Selected Manufactured Commodity C-roups in 1966 1/ 2/ Full Tariff Value of Actual- Tariff- Rate If No SITC Imports Tariff Exemption Exemptions Code (000 US$) Rate_ Rate Were Granted3( 51 Chemicals 134.55 12.1 1.9 l140 62 Rubber Products .43 8.3 27.9 36.2 63 Wood and Cork Products .20 17.3 19.8 37.1 64 Paper and Paperboard 3.52 17.4 24.0 41.4 65 Textiles 45e16 13.8 16,7 30.5 66 Non-Metallic Minerals 6.09 5.7 21.8 27.5 67 Iron and Steel 39.53 10.0 8.7 18.7 68 Non-Ferrous Metals 11.16 12.1 3.7 15.8 69 Other Metal Manufactures 18.81 9.5 31.0 h0o5 71 Non-Electrical Machinery 95.64 4.5 11.6 16.1 72 Electrical Machinery 26.09 11.9 12,5 24,4 73 Transport Equipment 29.99 7.7 17.7 25.4 84 Clothing .48 9,,2 23c3 32.5 85 Footwear .05 1.1 100.0 101.1 86 Professional, Scientific & Controlling Instrument 5.43 34.9 14.1 49.0 Total Manufacture listed above 437.13 101.0 10.6 20.6 All Commodities 716.44 9.7 8.8 18,5 1/ Tariff revenues actually collected divided by value of imports. 2/ Tariff revenues lost because of exemptions divided by value of imports. 3/Sum of 1/ and 2/, Source; Ministry of Finance, Foreign Trade of Korea, 1966 Ronald I. McKinnon "Tariff and Commodity Tax Reform in Korea: Some Specific Suggestions" Table 13 1/ Exports of Manufactured Goods - (million US$) Percent Share in Total Exports SITC Code Commodities 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 5 Chemicals .99 ScO .63 .38 .71 1.8 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.3 62 Rubber products (.08) (.51) (.91) (1.04) (1.46) (0.1) (0.6) (0.8) (0.6) (0.6 629.1 Rubber tires and tubes for vehicles .07 .51 .81 .92 1.28 0.1 o.6 0.7 0.5 0.5 63 Wood and cork products 2.30 6.34 11.50 18.23 30.64 4.2 7.3 9.7 10.4 12.2 631.211 Veneer sheets (2.06) (5.83) (11.40) (18.03) (29.88) (3.8) (6.7) (9.6) (10.3) (11.9 64 Paper and paperboard .03 .07 .08 .16 1.07 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 65 Textiles 2.22 7.80 19.64 26.34 34.48 4.1 9.0 16.5 15.1 13.8 652 Cotton fabrics, woven (1.84) (4.29) (11.12) (10.52) (10.12) (3,4) (4.9) (9.3) (6.0) (4.0 66 Non-metallic minerals .12 .88 1.95 2.76 1.61 0.2 1.0 1.6 1.6 0.7 67 Ir;on and steel .59 11,71 4.51 12.75 8.10 1.1 13.5 3.8 7.3 3.2 68 Non-ferrous metals .25 .30 2.86 2.94 2.55 0.5 0.3 2.4 1.7 1.0 69 Other metal manufactures .59 .51 .86 2.17 4.19 1.1 o.6 0.7 1,2 1.7 71 Non-electrical machinery .30 1.09 .!46 2.50 3.65 0.5 1.3 0.4 1.4 1.5 72 KLectrical machinery .11 .73 1.02 1.91 5.10 0.2 0.8 0.9 1.1 2.0 73 Transport equipment 1.04 2.24 .72 1.10 .80 1.9 2.6 o.6 a.6 0.3 84 Clothing 1.12 4.64 6.61 20.71 33.39 2.0 5.3 5.5 11.8 13.3 85 Footwear .24 .74 .88 4.15 5.47 0.4 0.9 0.7 2.4 2.2 899.94 899.550 Human hair and wigs, etc. .09 .26 3.66 6.61 15.49 0.2 0.3 3.1 3.8 6.2 - MiscelZaneous manufactures .51 .77 2.09 3.04 4.93 0.9 0.9 1.7 1.7 2.0 Total Manufactures 10.58 39.49 58.38 106.79 153.64 19.3 45.5 45.0 61.0 61.4 Total Exports 54.81 86.80 119.06 175.o8 250.33 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 1/ Not incl1ing agricultural goods with some processing, such as refined sugar and raw silk and mining products. Source: Bank .of Korea, Economic Statistics Yearbook, 1966 and 1967. Table 14 a., ,.. Najor E,-2ort Markets by MaLcir ya tu ES xprts in 1966 (in thousand US$) Rest of the SITC Commodities Total U.S.A. JaPan Viet Nam World 629.1 Rubber tires and tubes for 1/ vehicles 1,281 102 7 6 1,166- 2/ 631.211 Plywood and veneer sheet 29,880 26,469 14 - 3,397-` 64 Paper, paper board and manufactures 1,069 158 134 384 393; / 65 Textiles 34,477 9,688 2,631 83 22,0759- 652 Cotton fabrics, woven (10,121) (3,067) (46) (2) (7,006 ,, 66 Mon-metallic minerals 1,612 407 99 442 664`` 67 Iron and steel 8,10L 14 125 7,887 78 68 Non-ferrous metals 2,547 150 259 533 1,605:~ 69 Metal manufac'tures 4,191 994 2,430 239 528i 71 Non-electric machinery 3,655 72 410 1,771 1,402-/ 72 Electrical machinery 5,101 2,635 818 361 1,2872/ 724.2 Radios (3,319) (1,774) (435) - (1,110) 729.2 Electric lamps (995) (625) (355) (7) (8) 84 Clothing 33,387 16,274 2,758 1 14,354;0 85 Footwear 5,467 5,208 47 115 97 899. 94 Human hair, wigs, etc. 15,487 1)l,579 328 - 580 899.950) Sub-total 146,258 76,750 10,060 11,822 47,626 (%) 100.0 52.4 6.9 8.1 32.6 Total exports 250,334 95,782 66,293 13,843 74,416 (X) (1000-) (38.3) (26.5) (5.5) (29.7) 1T Thailand $851 thousand. 2/ Almost all of it to Canada. 3/ Equally divided between "Other Asia" and "Europe". T/ Fairly well distributed throughout the world, with Hong Kong some-,xhat higher than the rest. 5/ "Other Asia" slightly more than "Europe". 6/ Europe dominated with United Kingdom leading. 7/ Very thinlyx divided among the "Rest of the '7orld" 7/ Federal Republic of Germany and Hong Kong leading with $645 and $336 thousand respectively. 9/ Federal Republic of Germany and Belgium together constituteA 505. 10/ Sweden alone accounted for $8.75 million; others are: NL±!herlands, U.K., Canada and Federal Republic of Germany. Note: This table omits some small export items included in Table IV-1. Source: Ministry of Finance, Republic of Korea: Foreign Trade of Korea, 1966. Table 15 Outstanding Loans of K.R.B. By Industry (in billion won) September End of Period 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 Equip- - Equip- Equip- Equip- Equip- Equip- Total ment Total ment Total ment Total ment Total ment Total ment VHanufacturing 11.52 8.89 12.25 8.95 14.25 9.27 18.64 12.09 23.69 16.15 25.55 17.63 Food 1.09 .86 1.25 ,90 1.33 .91 1.92 1.46 1.99 1.48 2.05 1.56 Beverage .02 .01 .01 0 0 .22 .20 .32 .30 .40 .36 Textile 2.15 1.60 1.95 1 .4 2.32 1.53 3.79 2.75 5.40 4.20 5.59 3Q91 Footwear, other wearing apparel, etc. .01 0 .04 .01 .05 .01 .05 .01 .07 .01 - Wood and cork .17 .12 .30 .13 .30 .13 .30 .13 .47 .35 .47 .38 Furniture and fixtures .01 .01 .01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Paper ald paper products .73 .46 .75 .49 .80 .47 .76 .43 .99 .66 1.26 .84 Printing and publishing .03 .02 .02 .02 .14 .07 .29 .07 .26 .05 .34 .15 Leather and leather products .08 .04 .08 .04 .07 .03 .18 .08 .12 .07 .09 .04 Rubber products .29 .11 .34 .10 .45 .11 .71 .17 .99 *28 .93 .23 Chemical and chemical products 3.43 3.23 3.62 3.24 3.45 3.22 3.88 3.62 4.34 3.60 5.32 4.78 Petroleum and coal products .03 .01 .01 .01 .03 .01 .02 .01 .04 .02 .o8 .08 Glass, clay and stone products 1.08 .91 1.10 .94 1.86 .93 2.18 1.00 2.42 1.37 2.56 1.53 Basic metal .74 .45 .81 .55 .89 .60 1.19 .73 1.29. .85 1.37 .9S Metal.products .14 .o9 .24 .16 .32 .19 .43 .22 .65 .41 .72 .48 Machinery .49 .33 .37 .21 .42 .27 .50 .31 .79 .51 .92 .64 Electrical Machinery & appliances - .18 .10 - .38 .14 .68 .20 .74 .24 1.10 .51 1.14 .60 Transport equipments .78 .47 -.89 .49 1.02 .52 1.35 .61 2026 1.30 2.22 1.01 Miscellaneous .08 .05 .11 .o6 .12 .62 .13 .07 .20 .16 .o8 .06 Fishery .33 .30 .28 .26 .25 .23 - - .51 .18 .63 .16 Mining and Quarrying 1.42 1.14 1.75 1.33 1.72 1.33 1.77 1.39 1.97 1.38 2.91 1.79 Construction 2.62 2.62 2.98 2.98 3.18 3.18 3.46 3.46 3.70 3.70 .06 .06 ELectricity and Gas 7.57 7.14 9.37 9.22 11.08 10.95 11.20 11.09 13.28 13.19 15.69 15.45 Transport and Storage .58 .38 .66 .47 .95 .75 1.34 1.16 3.00 2.83 5.42 5.25 Services .28 .28 .33 .33 .32 .32 .37 .37 .49 .47 .70 .65 Total 2j3-2 20.74 27.62 23.54 31.74 26.02 36.78 29.56 46.64 37.89 51.01 41.o6 Source: The Korean Reconstruction Bank: Monthly Economic Review, 1967. Table IL Manufacturing Investment Plan for 1968 (t Fiiurrie-nt prices) R e q u i r e m e n t s Local Foreign Total Government Private (Billion W) (Million US$) (Billion W) (Billion W) (Billion W) Investment Goods Basic Metal 1.49 17.58 6.29 0.50 5.79 Non-Electrical Machinery 0.35 050 0.49 0.49 Electrical Machinery 0.26 6.12 1.93 1.93 Transport Equipment 2.44 14.13 6.29 0.70 5.59 Intermediate Goods Cement 2.37 14e31 6.28 6*28 Clay, Stone & Glass Products o.85 6.22 2.55 0.63 1.92 Plywood & Lumber 0.19 2.00 0,74 0074 Paper & Pulp 0.48 5.64 2.02 2X02 Fertilizer 0.51 0.51 0.51 Chemical Products 1.03 5.00 2.39 2.39 Petrochemical & Coal Products 6.25 40.43 17.29 0.10 17.19 Consumer Goods Food, Beverage, & Tobacco 2,09 5.04 3.46 2.55 0.91 Textiles lc45 15.12 5.58 _558 Manufacturing, specified by industry and projects 19.75 132.09 55.82 4.48 51.34 Other non-specified investments (including promotion of medium and small industry, stocks and some mining investments) 20.84 20.00 26.30 2.30 24.00 Total Manufacturing 40°59 152.09 82.12 6.78 75.34 Source: Investment Program in 1968 by Sources of Funds. EPB.