Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Report No. 67224-KE THE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORPORATION AND THE MULTILATERAL INVESTMENT GUARANTEE AGENCY COUNTRY PARTNERSHIP STRATEGY PROGRESS REPORT FOR THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA April 5, 2012 Eastern Africa Country Cluster 2 (AFCE2) Africa Region The International Finance Corporation Sub-Saharan Africa Department The Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency This document has a restricted distribution an d may be used by recipients onl y in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed withou t World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS US$1.00 = 85 Ksh (as of March 2012) GOVERNMENT FISCAL YEAR July 1–June 30 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AAA Analytical and Advisory Activities System AfDB African Development Bank INT Institutional Integrity Department AIDS Acquired Immunodeficiency IPP Independent Power Producers Syndrome KACC Kenya Anti-Corruption AusAID Australian Agency for International Commission Development KEMS Kenya Medical Supply Agency CDD Community Driven Development KESSP Kenya Education Sector Support CPS Country Partnership Strategy Project CSO Civil Society Organization KJAS Kenya Joint Assistance Strategy DANIDA Danish Agency for International KPLC Kenya Power and Lighting Development Company DCG Development Partner MDG Millennium Development Goals Coordination Group MIC Middle Income Country DPL Development Policy Loan M&E Monitoring and Evaluation EAC East African Community MIGA Multilateral Investment Guarantee EACC Ethics and Anti-Corruption Agency Commission MSMEs Micro, Small and Medium EMIS Education Management Enterprises Information System NCPB National Cereals and Produce ESRP Energy Sector Recovery Project Board EU European Union NGO Non-Governmental Organization GAC Governance and Anti-Corruption OVC Orphans and Vulnerable Children GDP Gross Domestic Product PforR Program For Results GEF Global Environment Facility PFM Public Finance Management HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus PPP Public-Private Partnerships IAD Internal Audit Department PRG Partial Risk Guarantee ICC International Criminal Court SWAp Sector Wide Approach ICT Information and Communication TOWA Total War against HIV and AIDS Technology USAID United States Agency for IDA International Development International Development Association WBI World Bank Institute IFC International Finance Corporation WBG World Bank Group IFMIS Integrated Financial Management WSP Water and Sanitation Program IDA IFC MIGA Vice President Obiageli K. Ezekwesili Thierry Tanoh Michel Wormser Country Director Johannes Zutt Jean Philippe Prosper Ravi Vish Task Team Leader Johannes Widmann Aida Kimemia Conor Healy COUNTRY PARTNERSHIP STRATEGY PROGRESS REPORT FOR THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA TABLE OF CONTENTS  Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... i  I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1  II. Country Context ................................................................................................................................... 1  A.   Economic Context ................................................................................................................... 1  B.   Political Context ...................................................................................................................... 2  III. Progress toward CPS Outcomes and Emerging Challenges ............................................................... 4  A.   Progress on CPS Objective 1: Unleashing Kenya’s Growth Potential .................................... 5  B.   Progress on CPS Objective 2: Addressing Inequality and Social Exclusion ........................... 7  C.   Progress on CPS Objective 3: Managing Resource Constraints and Environmental Challenges ................................................................................................................................ 8  D.   Progress on Governance .......................................................................................................... 8  E.   Progress on Gender ................................................................................................................ 10  IV. Adjustments to the CPS and Lessons Learned in Implementation ................................................... 10  A.  Lessons Learned .................................................................................................................... 10  B.   CPS Program Adjustments .................................................................................................... 11  C.   Implementation Progress ....................................................................................................... 13  D.   Changes to the Results Framework ....................................................................................... 15  V. Risks ................................................................................................................................................... 15  Table 1: Progress on CPS Outcomes ............................................................................................................ 4  Annex 1: Updated Results Framework for the Kenya CPS FY10-FY13.................................................... 17  Annex 2: Updated and Revised CPS Outcomes ......................................................................................... 25  Annex 3: Ongoing and Proposed Knowledge Program .............................................................................. 26  Annex 4: Planned versus Actual Lending Program and Pipeline ............................................................... 27  Annex 5: Selected Indicators of Portfolio Performance and Management ................................................. 28  Annex 6: IDA Operations Portfolio ............................................................................................................ 29  Annex 7: Kenya Regional Portfolio ............................................................................................................ 30  Annex 8: Kenya Trust Fund Portfolio......................................................................................................... 31  Annex 9: Kenya IFC Portfolio .................................................................................................................... 32  Annex 10: Kenya at a Glance ..................................................................................................................... 33  Map of Kenya No. IBRD 33426   COUNTRY PARTNERSHIP STRATEGY PROGRESS REPORT THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA Executive Summary i. This Progress Report shows that the FY10-13 Country Partnership Strategy (CPS) for Kenya remains relevant and that progress has been made in achieving its objectives. The CPS, dated March 23, 2010, departed from previous strategies in (i) articulating a longer- term (10-20 year) strategic outlook, (ii) attempting to identify national solutions for national development problems, (iii) aiming to shift Bank engagement away from project lending toward a programmatic approach, combining knowledge and financing in core areas such as energy, roads, water and urban development, and (iv) aiming to support Kenya’s achievement of Middle Income Country (MIC) status. ii. Several key changes have occurred in Kenya since the Board discussed the CPS in April 2010. A new Constitution was adopted in 2010, introducing the largest governance reforms since independence as well as an ambitious program of devolution. In addition, several structural trends have become more pronounced. These include sustained high growth in East Africa, enabling sustained poverty reduction and a broadening of the middle class, but also shining a spotlight on Nairobi as a regional hub and Mombasa as a natural (but underperforming) transport hub. Kenya is also a good example of the new aid architecture: as Kenya grows, traditional donors are less important, new donors are becoming more important, and a high degree of fragmentation and volatility continues to hinder aid effectiveness. iii. While the risks identified in the CPS have grown larger, the opportunities have as well. Devolution provides an opportunity to rectify the unequal distribution of investments and services across Kenya, but also brings the risk that poor regions with lower capacity will fall further behind. The new Constitution brings unprecedented opportunities to improve governance, including through increased transparency (e.g., the open data portal and public vetting of government officials, including in the judiciary), but also increases the risk of elite capture (e.g., through decentralizing corruption to the new county governments). Finally, elections (due by March 15, 2012) involve the risk of electoral violence, which has sullied many of Kenya’s polls in the past, but also provide an opportunity to overcome a legacy of election- related violence, to bring an end to its extra-constitutional coalition government, and to make a fresh political start. iv. The World Bank Group (WBG) will continue to help advance governance reforms in Kenya, using its combined strengths as a convener, knowledge provider, and significant financier. In line with the Bank’s Strategy for Africa, it will focus on three key areas: (i) fostering partnerships, (ii) providing knowledge, and (iii) leveraging finance. In terms of partnerships and knowledge, Kenya’s high literacy, social vibrancy and emerging middle class provide additional opportunities to expand the Bank’s knowledge program and engage actively with a broad range of stakeholders, including through social media. While the current lending program remains heavily focused on investment lending in key growth sectors such as transport, energy, water and urban development, a shift to development policy lending and program-for- results (PforR) financing—in the right circumstances—would provide more natural new instruments to help advance governance reforms and leverage the Bank’s limited resources. i   I. Introduction 1. This Country Partnership Strategy Progress Report (CPS PR) assesses the implementation of the World Bank’s FY10-13 Country Partnership Strategy (CPS) for Kenya. The CPS intends to make a catalytic contribution to Kenya’s continuing transformation to a middle-income country (MIC). Over the CPS period, the World Bank Group (WBG) aims to contribute to achieving more inclusive growth by supporting activities aiming to (i) unleash Kenya’s growth potential; (ii) reduce inequality and social exclusion; and (iii) address resource constraints and environmental challenges. Within these objectives, the CPS is supporting eight outcomes and seven sub-outcomes. This CPS PR describes changes in the country context, progress toward CPS outcomes, and remaining challenges, and it also adjusts the Bank’s program and updates the risk framework. II. Country Context A. Economic Context 2. Kenya started the CPS period by rebounding from economic difficulties in 2008-09 and registering strong growth. In 2010, growth reached 5.6 percent of GDP. This was a large improvement over 1.7 percent in 2008 and 2.5 percent in 2009, when growth was hampered by violence following the December 2007 elections, higher international food and fuel prices, the global financial crisis, and four consecutive rain failures, resulting in widespread drought. Growth in 2010, by contrast, benefited from a strong recovery in agriculture, helped by good rains, and a rebound in the industrial and services sectors. 3. But the country had to navigate another economic storm in 2011. Inflation increased substantially, reaching about 19 percent for 2011 (from 3 percent at end-2010). The depreciating shilling reached an all-time low of 107 to the US dollar in October 2011, before recovering to about 85 by year-end, after the central bank sharply tightened monetary policy. High inflation was sparked by higher import prices—initially for food and fuel—which in turn weakened the shilling and put further pressure on prices. Because of the shilling depreciation, import prices continued to rise even after global food and fuel prices had started to retreat. (In Kenya, food prices have been well above global prices—and higher than in other African countries—due to a government policy of maintaining high maize producer prices). Despite these challenges, Kenya still grew at more than 4.0 percent in 2011. This was lower than in 2010, but still higher than during the 2008-09 crisis, and higher than the average growth rate for 2000-2010. This growth was driven primarily by good performance in the services sector and tourism. Agriculture also performed better than expected, despite a severe drought in the middle of the year, and the short rains promised a strong harvest for end-2011 and early 2012. 4. Recent shocks have provided fresh impetus to fiscal consolidation, which started in FY2011/12. Initially, the Government planned to reduce the debt-to-GDP ratio from 48.8 percent in 2010/2011 to 46.7 percent by 2013/2014, but recent shocks and the need to reduce domestic demand have called for a more aggressive consolidation, targeting 44.6 percent by 2013/14. This is to be achieved through spending cuts in the medium term and improve the primary deficit from -2.7 percent to -2.2 percent of GDP. If the envisaged consolidation takes place, it will rebuild fiscal policy buffers back to pre-crisis levels. That said, fiscal consolidation 1 will be more difficult in light of emerging pressures, including the implementation of the new Constitution and the upcoming elections. 5. Kenya’s medium-term growth prospects are mixed and, while Kenya could still be on the cusp of entering a period of sustained growth, there are substantial risks going forward. For 2012, assuming a favorable external environment, restoration of macroeconomic stability, stabilization in Somalia and a peaceful run-up to the next general elections followed by a peaceful transition of power, Kenya could grow at 5.0 percent. But if these optimistic assumptions are not met, growth could be as low as 3.1 percent. The risks are significant that either (i) national elections bring a period of economic uncertainty or (ii) the economic crisis in the Euro zone deepens. Even on the optimistic scenario, growth would remain substantially lower than the 10 percent rate anticipated under the Kenya’s Vision 2030 development strategy. Even so, Kenya could still reach MIC status of US$1,000 GDP per capita by 2020, provided that growth accelerates to an average of 6 percent over the remaining period. 6. Deep structural problems are the key impediment to growth and continue to call for WBG support over the rest of the CPS period and beyond. As the Government in 2011 struggled to respond to renewed external pressures, but without the significant fiscal buffer that had existed in 2008-09, the economy became increasingly imbalanced, with the current account deficit in 2011 exceeding 10 percent of GDP. Kenya’s overall export performance remains disappointing, due to a number of factors, including inefficiencies at the port of Mombasa, an inadequate and expensive supply of energy, underdeveloped transport networks, limited reform of business regulations, and a lack of decisive action to curb corruption. This makes Kenya too expensive for many international investors, especially in manufacturing, despite lower labor costs than in emerging Asia. While Kenya is globally competitive in a number of sectors— especially tea, tourism and horticulture—it has not sufficiently ventured into new products, such as textiles (beyond the African Growth and Opportunities Act) and chemicals (where some potential exists). In addition, Kenya is struggling to manage a structural shift from a predominantly rural to an increasingly urban economy, and the need to protect cities as growth poles during devolution. A more welcoming business environment, improved infrastructure (including a modernized port as Mombasa), and strong action to curb corruption would help Kenya to re-start its export engine and establish a deeper industrial base. On the positive side, Kenya is already diversifying its export markets away from Europe and towards Asia and Africa: today more than 45 percent of Kenya’s trade is with other African countries, and trade with Asia is rising exponentially. This positive development can also be more fully exploited. B. Political Context 7. The next year will define the next decade for Kenya, as the country will undergo several changes that provide important opportunities for political renewal. First, the new Constitution has provided Kenya with a roadmap to a more inclusive and equitable future. It introduces the most far-reaching institutional reforms in Kenya’s history, and its impact is already being felt (e.g., in the televised vetting processes used to appoint a new Chief Justice and Deputy Chief Justice, and the large amounts of budgetary and other government data made available online in Kenya’s open data initiative). Second, a key test of Kenya’s growing maturity will be how the Government and the country manage the next elections, which should take place by March 15, 2013. These elections will be the first since the violent 2007 elections, and they will be unusually complicated, as voters will be voting not only for the president and 2 members of parliament, but also for senator, county governor, county assembly member, and female representative. Third, these challenges will need to be addressed in a context of growing economic uncertainty. High food and fuel prices, drought in the Horn of Africa, and the euro crisis have weakened Kenya’s external position, which was already fragile given its large current account deficit. Going forward, the Government will need to contain macroeconomic pressures by maintaining a tight monetary stance and exercising fiscal prudence. To manage these challenges, Kenya’s policy makers will need to display skill and steadfast leadership. Kenyans have high expectations for the next elections and their leaders will need to move forward with high-quality planning and execution to ensure that these expectations are not disappointed. 8. The approval of the new Constitution was a watershed moment in Kenya’s post- independence history. It was approved in a public referendum by 67 percent of the voters. Key changes that it introduced include subjecting the presidency to more checks and balances; increasing the independence of the judiciary; strengthening parliamentary oversight over the executive; devolving government to 47 elected county governments to create a better center- region balance; and protecting the rights of women, marginalized groups, and the disabled through an ambitious bill of rights. The Government and its international partners are now focusing on the large legislative agenda that must be completed to implement these reforms, and successful implementation of the new Constitution is likely to be the single most critical factor in determining Kenya’s development prospects. It may also trigger significant changes in the Bank’s engagement in Kenya. 9. While the new Constitution offers avenues for improving and building credible institutions, vested interests remain strong and impunity continues to pose the biggest governance challenge. In June 2011, in line with the constitution, the Government established a new Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) to replace the Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission (KACC), which ceased to exist. While the EACC as a constitutional body has a stronger legal foundation than the KACC and so could be more powerful in the long term, there have already been serious attempts to undermine its effectiveness. Also in line with the new Constitution, the Government appointed a new Chief Justice, Attorney General, and Director of Public Prosecution, but there has still been no successful prosecution of any politically- connected individual for corruption or involvement in post-election violence. Issues of fraud and corruption remain daily fare, and much more needs to be done to control them. Improving governance and in particular strengthening fiduciary oversight and integrity mechanisms will therefore continue to be critical challenges for the Government and across the Bank’s portfolio. 10. Kenya’s devolution program is one of the most ambitious in the world, transferring a substantial amount of power and resources to an entirely new level of government and carrying the promise of a more equitable model of development. Rather than giving political autonomy to administrative units that are already in place, Kenya in one go will replace eight provinces and 280+ districts with forty-seven new counties. This devolution is intended to rectify the unequal distribution across the country of investments and services that, historically, has been concentrated spatially to the benefit of some regions at the expense of others. Although the transition into a devolved state can continue for up to three years after the next elections, much analytical and technical work is already underway to understand the implications of devolution for the Government and for the Bank’s portfolio. 3 11. For devolution to work, several challenges will need to be addressed. One is ensuring that the devolution of functions from central to local levels will not result in deterioration in service delivery. While the national government will remain responsible for policy, oversight and some service delivery, county governments will be responsible for a range of service delivery functions in the health, agriculture, transport and water sectors. There is a real risk that the poorer and more remote counties that hope to gain the most from devolution will in fact lose the most, at least in the short term, because regions that have been historically left out are precisely the ones least able seamlessly to take over service delivery obligations. Moreover, while the Constitution mandates that at least 15 percent of national revenue be transferred to counties, this is unlikely to be enough to finance all devolved functions. Ensuring appropriate financing—including possibly through conditional block grants—will be critical to avoiding additional fiscal stress and ensuring that service delivery standards are maintained. III. Progress toward CPS Outcomes and Emerging Challenges 12. Kenya’s progress toward CPS outcomes has been largely positive, but important challenges remain. The following section describes how Kenya’s new realities affect the Bank’s program under each CPS outcome. Table 1 provides an overview of progress on each outcome. A more detailed assessment of progress is provided in Annex 1. Table 1: Progress on CPS Outcomes CPS outcome 1.1: Improved business environment and competitiveness  CPS outcome 1.2: Improved core infrastructure, with deeper regional integration CPS sub‐outcome 1. 2a: Transport CPS sub‐outcome 1.2b: Energy CPS sub‐outcome 1.2c: Water CPS sub‐outcome 1.2d:  Information and communication technology CPS outcome 1.3: Enhanced agricultural productivity, with a focus on food security  CPS outcome 1.4: Strengthening public sector management  and improving sub‐ national governance, especially in urban areas  CPS outcome 2.1: Better access to health care, education, and basic infrastructure  services CPS sub‐outcome 2.1a: Better access to health care CPS sub‐outcome 2.1b: Better access to education CPS sub‐outcome 2.1c: Better access to basic infrastructure services  CPS outcome 2.2: Establishing comprehensive scalable social protection mechanisms CPS outcome 3.1: Improved management of key natural resources  CPS outcome 3.2: Adapting to climate change 4 A. Progress on CPS Objective 1: Unleashing Kenya’s Growth Potential 13. The CPS outcomes under the first objective are: (i) improving Kenya’s business environment and competitiveness; (ii) improving core infrastructure, especially in roads, electricity, and water supply, with a view to deepening regional integration; (iii) enhancing agricultural productivity, with a special focus on food security; and (iv) strengthening public sector management and improving sub-national governance, especially in urban areas. 14. Overall progress on improving Kenya’s business environment has been mixed, and challenges remain to improve its competitiveness. Even though Kenya implemented reforms in areas covered by the Doing Business and Global Competitiveness surveys, its Doing Business ranking fell over 2009-2011 due to faster progress by other countries. While this CPS outcome takes a narrow focus on the regulatory environment, the Bank’s program takes a broader perspective, including particularly on the need to establish more private-public partnerships (PPPs) and increase access to finance. Key challenges going forward include improving the lending environment, improving exports (particularly for manufacturing), and attracting foreign direct investment (which remains below expected levels for Kenya). 15. Progress in the transport sector has been mixed, and challenges remain to deepen regional integration. Kenya has an extensive road network, but only 11 percent of roads are in good condition. The time to move a container through the port or to travel from Mombasa to Uganda has improved, but at a slower pace than expected. With strong growth in East Africa, constraints in the port are an increasing impediment to trade and investment; hence increasing the port’s capacity and operational efficiency are critically important. The need to attract private investors into transport infrastructure also remains an important objective, and to this end the capacity of the construction industry to deliver and maintain capital projects needs further improvement. While the transport sector has generally succeeded in institutional reform, its capacity to deliver services remains limited and it also needs to adjust to devolution. 16. There has been good progress in the energy sector, but attracting private investments to meet the country’s energy needs remains a challenge. The number of electricity connections has risen significantly, but transmission and distribution losses remain higher than expected. IDA is anchoring an expansion of geothermal generation at Olkaria, and an innovative combination of IDA, IFC, and MIGA credits and guarantees is supporting Independent Power Producers (IPPs) in thermal, geothermal and wind generation. Even so, Kenya will need more investment in generation capacity to keep pace with its growth, and it will also need to shift generation capacity over time from drought-sensitive hydropower and fuel price-sensitive thermal options to greener technologies. The key challenge going forward is to attract more private investment, and this will require identifying more long-term financing for energy projects in Kenya. In addition, there is a need to understand better the volatility of oil and gas prices, which continue to have a negative impact. 17. Good progress has also been made on improving access to water, but shifting water service delivery modalities so that they accommodate devolution will be a challenge. Over the short term, critical legislation, including a draft bill for the National Land Commission, needs to be reviewed to ensure consistency and harmony across laws during the institutional transformation of the water sector. Important analytical work has been done to inform this 5 process and to identify investment needs to meet current and future demand—for households, industry and agriculture. As with transport and energy, enlarging access to private-sector financing will be critical to satisfying Kenya’s growing needs for water production, storage and delivery. Investing in private water infrastructure remains particularly difficult in poorer urban areas, given their high degree of informality. 18. Good progress was achieved in the information and communications sector, including a fast expansion of access and the deployment of one of the first government open data portals in Africa. Access to internet services rose dramatically, from 1.3 million subscribers in 2007 to 14.3 million (37 percent of the population) by 2011. In addition, 80 percent of Kenyan adults own a mobile phone and another 10 percent regularly borrow one; and calling rates have dropped sharply, making Kenya’s communication costs among the lowest worldwide. In July 2011, Kenya also launched its open data portal, which provides free access to large digital datasets online. The government is now developing a plan to institutionalize the portal through enabling policy reforms (including access to information legislation), expand datasets and usability, and conduct sustained outreach with data users and the public. 19. Agriculture productivity has declined, and so enhancing productivity and also food security remains a key objective. Kenya continues to suffer from a structural food deficit. Hence food prices, particularly for maize, are usually high. Reforms, both to improve food productivity and enhance domestic and regional marketing systems, are urgently needed to unleash the sector’s potential and to attract private sector investments and participation. The Bank has tried to persuade the government to abandon its high maize price policy, to permit maize imports to enter the country duty free and to reform the National Cereals and Produce Board (which has been prone to corruption) but with limited success. Furthermore, climate variability and change are increasingly affecting agricultural productivity and food security, as evidenced by numerous droughts in recent years: an EU-UN-WBG drought impact assessment completed in January 2012 found that damages and losses to the Kenyan economy resulting from drought over 2008-11 totaled a cumulative US$12 billion, with 72 percent occurring in livestock and 13 percent in agriculture. Thus climate-smart agriculture remains a priority. 20. Progress towards strengthening public sector management and improving sub- national governance, especially in urban areas, has been slow, though the new Constitution has increased the urgency of this effort. Among other things, the new Constitution provides the basis to overhaul the institutional and legal framework for public financial management (PFM). As 15 percent of national revenues are to be transferred to the counties, the rest of the CPS period will be dominated by the need to introduce prudent fiscal management practices in county governments, while further strengthening central fiscal management practices. There have generally been improvements over the past two years, including strengthening audit and other oversight capacities, and rolling out Fixed Assets, Cash Management and Accounts Receivable of Integrated Financial Management System (IFMIS) across central ministries. Nevertheless, PFM remains weak and issues remain, such as weak financial reporting, an ineffective internal control framework, and an audit backlog with regard to local authorities. 6 B. Progress on CPS Objective 2: Addressing Inequality and Social Exclusion 21. CPS outcomes under the second objective are: (i) improving access to health care, education, and basic infrastructure services; and (ii) establishing comprehensive scalable social protection mechanisms. 22. There has been encouraging progress in the health sector, based on the implementation of enhanced governance mechanisms, which needs to be sustained. During FY10-11, over 25.3 million people directly benefited from activities under the health SWAp; about one million children were fully immunized in their first year. A joint donor-government fiduciary review suggests that grants and essential medicines are also reaching health facilities as intended. This progress comes after a long period of limited success, due to governance issues, and so the Bank’s engagement remains focused on addressing corruption risks. Other forward- looking challenges include strengthening M&E and improving record-keeping at health facilities. Under the constitution, the delivery of health services will be devolved to county governments— a process that needs to be managed carefully to ensure that service delivery is not impeded. 23. While education indicators have improved, governance issues ended a donor program supporting the government, providing important lessons for future engagement in the sector. Data from the Ministry of Education showed improvements in key indicators, but due to emerging evidence of corruption (uncovered by the government’s Internal Audit Department (IAD) with Bank support), IDA support was effectively ended in July 2009, about 17 months before credit closure. Post-election violence and lack of quality monitoring data also negatively affected implementation. Partly as a result, overall progress in the sector was unsatisfactory and significant risks exist with respect to: (i) achieving the education MDGs; (ii) improving sector capacity, especially for collecting and analyzing data; (iii) increasing access to secondary school; and (iv) improving the school-to-work transition. Among the greatest challenges in the sector now are inadequate oversight and accountability systems. 24. Overall progress on urban infrastructure development was slow, and devolution will pose a key challenge, as new counties will be in charge of urban service delivery. While the constitution strengthens claims of citizens for access to basic urban services, including adequate housing and water and sanitation, it also shifts the management of urban revenues and services from stand-alone national bodies to the new counties. A 2011 urban areas and cities act, to become effective after the elections, provides for classification, governance and management of urban areas—but the constitution does not recognize urban governments as such. Instead, the counties will need to create urban governments as their delegated agencies—a process that the Bank is supporting and that will also affect the implementation of Bank projects in ways that are still under assessment. 25. There has been some progress in providing social protection to vulnerable groups, but a key challenge remains to establish a more integrated social protection system. The Bank’s support to youth employment suffered from weaknesses in the financial management of a public works component originally envisaged to be implemented through six line ministries in eight districts. This complicated implementation mechanism made it difficult to ensure a sufficient span of control over all sub-project activities, and so the component was cancelled. By contrast, there has been good progress in providing cash transfers to orphans and vulnerable 7 children. The government’s overriding challenge now is to defragment social protection and provide a more strategic, holistic and consolidate approach, including for post-disaster relief. C. Progress on CPS Objective 3: Managing Resource Constraints and Environmental Challenges 26. CPS outcomes under the third objective are: (i) improving management of key natural resources; and (ii) adapting to climate change. 27. Progress on improving the management of natural resources has been mixed, and further progress will be linked to finding a long-term solution to pressing land-use issues. Forest areas managed according to approved plans have increased in number, but more slowly than expected. In addition, establishment of a national drought contingency fund and drought management system was stalled due to integrity issues in the Arid Lands Project, which supported these efforts, though the government established a Drought Management Authority in 2011 on its own. Going forward, livelihood investments will be linked to the devolution agenda and the Bank’s dialogue on a country-wide program to provide support to marginalized areas. This will help both to leverage support for sustainable natural resource management and to guide and encourage government use of community-driven development (CDD) approaches. 28. Progress on specific indicators for climate change adaptation has been slow, but climate change as a key issue has been increasingly mainstreamed across the portfolio. In particular, the Bank is helping to improve forest and water management; to diversify the sources of energy towards renewables; and to improve readiness and response in cases of climate- induced emergencies. For example, IDA in response to the 2011 drought has programmed resources from the Crisis Response Window in agriculture (helping farmers to adopt better crop technologies and pastoralists to diversify livelihoods), health (enhancing surveillance, drug and medical supplies, and treatment of malnutrition), water resources (expanding water supply and storage facilities), social protection (strengthening safety nets), energy (developing generation alternatives to hydropower) and disaster risk reduction. The effort to introduce bus rapid transport and commuter rail, particularly in Nairobi, is also intended to reduce carbon emissions. D. Progress on Governance 29. A renewed faith in Kenya’s democracy provides Kenyans with unprecedented opportunities and major challenges going forward. Kenya today features a vibrant multi- party democracy, a very vocal media and high levels of transparency but, paradoxically, low levels of accountability and high levels of corruption. Recent developments, including reconciliation after the 2007 elections as well as the adoption of a new Constitution, are helping to improve openness and increase citizens’ voice, strengthen the role of the judiciary, achieve legal reforms, improve service delivery, attain a more equitable distribution of resources, and strengthen political good will. The challenges going forward are therefore to (i) protect the new openness (e.g. sustain the open data initiative, improve data quality and provide whistle blower protection), (ii) manage citizen expectations in a politically-challenging environment (e.g. around the upcoming elections, the war with al Shaabab and the legal processes of the International Criminal Court), (iii) fight impunity and disregard for the rule of law, and (iv) keep devolution from resulting in elite capture (e.g. the decentralization of corruption) while strengthening the capacity for its implementation (e.g. improve public finances and procurement, absorption capacity and transparency and accountability at the local level). 8 30. To help the government seize these opportunities and address the challenges, the Bank will continue to focus on governance as a cross-cutting and prime objective of its strategy. The Africa Region’s strategy identifies governance and public sector capacity as its foundation and notes that governance and leadership constitute the main challenges underlying Africa’s development. This is especially true in Kenya, and the Bank’s strategy will continue to have a strong governance focus. In order to better underline this focus, the Bank identified three key areas that best highlight the Bank’s contribution to this important agenda: (i) increased public confidence in the judiciary, (ii) improved openness and accountability, and (iii) meaningful devolution. Future Bank efforts will broadly focus in these areas, which will provide useful building blocks for the next CPS. 31. During the first half of the CPS period, the Bank addressed serious governance issues in its portfolio, through firm implementation of the GAC agenda. In September 2009, the government’s Internal Audit Department (IAD) concluded a forensic audit of the Kenya Education Sector Support Project (KESSP) and the Western Kenya CDD project, finding substantial questionable spending, and possible fraud and corruption, under each project. Disbursements were immediately suspended and work undertaken to determine what caused the integrity failures, whether systemic issues contributed, and how such systemic issues could best be addressed. Throughout this period, the Bank’s Integrity Vice Presidency (INT) conducted and finalized a forensic audit of phase two of the Arid Lands Management Project, presenting its findings to the government in April 2011. In this case, project disbursements were informally suspended in July 2010, based on a verbal communication of INT’s initial findings, and work is now underway to understand fully the implications of INT’s report. KESSP and Arid Lands both closed in December 2010, as scheduled, without resuming disbursements, but Western Kenya CDD is slowly resuming operations, after a 16-month suspension, with (inter alia) a new professionally-recruited project implementation unit. 32. Over FY11-12, the Bank incorporated key lessons from IAD audits and INT investigations and issued new guidance on projects with decentralized expenditures. Of the entire Bank portfolio of about US$2.2 billion, US$2 billion involve centralized expenditures (where the Bank directly supervises procurement, financial management, compliance, and value- for-money, dealing mostly with large-scale contracts). For such projects, anti-corruption efforts have focused on improving procurement, including by eliminating pre-qualification (to reduce opportunities for cartel behavior) and by undertaking independent reviews of procurement processes in parallel to government processes to ensure that there is compliance with all requirements. These and other measures appear to have resulted in some success, as bids for road contracts (for example) now number seven to nine per contract (as opposed to two or three previously), include companies of many nationalities and regions (as opposed to one region or nationality in some cases), and result in some bids below engineers’ estimates (as opposed to bids five or more percent above). More recently, the Bank’s anti-corruption efforts have focused on the US$200 million in portfolio activities involving decentralized expenditures (namely, small expenditures at local level involving myriad spending agencies), where the Bank relies on intermediaries to supervise procurement, financial management, compliance and value- for-money. In response to these risks, the Bank is enhancing project design and implementation support in ways further detailed below (see paragraph 40). 9 E. Progress on Gender 33. Another cross-cutting issue is gender, and the Bank continues to support the integration of gender concerns in design, implementation, and M&E across its portfolio. Inter alia, the Bank has helped the government to establish gender-related targets in government Performance Contracts; to gather gender-disaggregated data on water and sanitation, household energy, and climate management through surveying 4,100 men and women under a Bank- supported agriculture project; and to remove gender-related obstacles to access to safe water (e.g., by eliminating the need to supply a title deed as collateral for a water connection, reducing connection fees, and amortizing meter repayment). Based on survey and other work, Gender Policy Notes are now being developed at the sectoral level, aiming to expand women’s access to water, sanitation services, modern energy, and opportunities in agriculture. IDA has also facilitated South-South exchanges to strengthen Kenya’s capacity to diagnose policy options and challenges for gender mainstreaming. IV. Adjustments to the CPS and Lessons Learned in Implementation 34. The overall objectives of the CPS remain valid and relevant. The following section provides a brief reflection on the lessons learned in implementation thus far, outlines some adjustments to the Bank’s program in light of the new realities on the ground, and introduces a few changes to the results framework to improve its realism. Any changes to the original CPS reflect a deepening of the Bank’s strategic directions rather than a new course direction. A. Lessons Learned 35. Lessons have been in four areas, prompting some program adjustments. These include: (i) the devolution agenda, (ii) the use of new Bank lending instruments, (iii) knowledge, partnerships and leveraging of finance (in line with the World Bank strategy for Africa), and (iv) governance. Regarding devolution, it is now clear that it will affect a range of sectors, including water (where new institutional arrangements could lead to inefficiencies in the use of scarce resources), agriculture (where it offers the chance for better service delivery and enhanced productivity), health (where it will require building capacity at the county level to manage the transition and sustain the focus on the health MDGs), and urban (where the management of urban revenues and services will shift from standalone entities to the new counties). Regarding instruments, experience shows that an exclusive use of sector investment loans is limiting the Bank’s ability to support government efforts to achieve specified reforms. In particular, the consolidation of social protection efforts could best be supported through the new PforR instrument, and various government-wide PFM and private sector development (PSD) efforts could best be supported by development policy lending. In this context, the opportunity to use these instruments will continue to be explored during the remaining CPS period. Regarding leveraging of financing, facilitation of public-private partnerships (PPP) beyond the relatively well-covered energy sector is increasingly important to support private investments, and partnerships with civil society and the media need to be strengthened to close the gap between transparency and accountability. Regarding governance, it will continue to pose the biggest challenge for the Bank’s program in Kenya. The focus going forward will be to support the strengthening of key national and county institutions to deal with governance challenges and to address GAC challenges within the Bank’s portfolio, through strengthening reporting and monitoring systems and an enhanced emphasis on social accountability. In addition to these adjustments, as Kenya starts to reach MIC status and its dependency on aid falls further (from a 10 current 10% of the budget), the Bank will have to step up its efforts as a knowledge provider even more. B. CPS Program Adjustments 36. While the exact form of devolution will be determined after the elections, the Bank is already adjusting to its potential impact. With AusAID support, the Bank has been running a large analytical and technical program to provide policy and institutional reform advice to the government to help manage the complex transition from its current centralized to a more decentralized structure. The four aspects of devolution that will impact development programming in Kenya are (i) functional assignments, (ii) inter-governmental fiscal relations, (iii) civil servant assignments, and (iv) accountability mechanisms. The decentralization of some currently centralized functions will impact a number of Bank operations, including particularly urban development projects, which will have to reorient activities selectively from national to local (county-level) structures. To accommodate these changes, project preparation or implementation already involves close attention to the possibility of institutional transition, with a view to ensuring that appropriate capacity is built into whatever local structures finally emerge. With at least 15 percent of national revenues to be transferred to the new county governments, the Bank is also working hard to ensure that devolved functions are appropriately financed, that intergovernmental fiscal relations are appropriate (and in particular that devolved functions are adequately financed, possibly with conditional grants), and that new structures do not create distortions. In addition, the Bank’s social development and PFM teams are refocusing their activities to enable them to provide hands-on support to introduce appropriate accountability measures in county governments. 37. Given Kenya’s far-reaching governance reforms, the Bank will explore the use of instruments that are better suited to support this agenda. The current Bank portfolio entirely involves sector investment lending. A planned PforR operation in social protection will introduce a focus on results-based lending, and help to reduce fragmentation within the sector. To this end, IDA has helped to articulate a social protection policy on the national level and is now working towards consolidating existing programs onto a single registry, using biometric identification, a private payment provider, and consolidated management information and M&E systems, so that the government is better able to provide support to vulnerable populations, even at times of emergency. Despite government achievement of most prior actions related to a planned development policy loan (DPL)—which the Bank saw as the most effective vehicle for supporting key PFM and private sector development reforms—issues unrelated to the project have stalled presentation of the loan (see below). Even so, a properly-structured DPL series remains the best way to achieve development effectiveness, for the following reasons:  Support to governance reforms. A DPL is ideally suited to helping to implement the constitution, which involves the most sustained governance reform in Kenya’s history.  Leverage. As aid remains relatively flat and Kenya’s budget continues to grow, a DPL series would help to focus donors and the relevant parts of government on an articulated multi-year policy and institutional reform program, particularly in complex areas requiring multi-agency/ministry cooperation over a sustained multi-year period.  Lower fiduciary risks. Kenya’s CPIA rating of 3.8 is better than the rating for most countries receiving budget support, and a commitment to open data provides new opportunities to reduce leakage and improve service delivery. 11  Complementary IMF program. Since 2011, the IMF has supported a substantial and successful policy-based operation, which includes governance reforms (such as the introduction of a Treasury single account); a complementary IDA program, focused on social and structural reforms, would enhance the transformative impact of that program. 38. In line with the World Bank strategy for Africa, the Bank’s strategy for Kenya will enhance its focus in three key areas: (i) knowledge, (ii) partnerships and (iii) leveraging of finance. Given that Kenya aims to reach MIC status by 2020 and that it is becoming less and less an aid-dependant country, the Bank’s enhanced focus on being a knowledge provider rather than a traditional project financier will increasingly take center-stage. The highly-successful launch (in 2009) of the bi-annual Kenya Economic Updates, which have helped the Bank to frame debate on Kenya’s economic reform agenda, will provide a model for disseminating upcoming poverty work and flagship sectoral work (most recently, in water, education and social protection). As IDA (and more generally donor) financing continues to become a smaller part of Kenya’s overall development financing, and Kenya seeks to learn the lessons of experience from developing countries that are slightly ahead of it, the focus on applying global development experience to local development problems will grow. Partnerships will also be crucial for the Bank to remain relevant in Kenya. This includes: partnerships with other donors to achieve scale; partnerships with the private sector to leverage more private sector financing, especially for infrastructure; and partnerships with the media and civil society to continue to improve governance and accountability. Leveraging additional sources of finance will also be of importance in the WBG’s work, as Kenya’s financing needs, as a MIC, will be far beyond the ability of the WBG, even in conjunction with other donor partners, to finance. Recent successes point a way forward: for example, the combination of IFC investments and IDA and MIGA guarantees is enabling Independent Power Projects to achieve financial closure on investments that will bring up to 600MW of new power to the grid. But challenges remain, as shown by the failure of a six-year WBG effort to support a private consortium to solve Nairobi’s downtown traffic congestion (in that case the WBG withdrew in January 2010 due to integrity concerns about one of the private investors). Even so, the WBG and the government recognize that public private partnerships (PPPs)—in energy, transport and water as well as other sectors—will be needed to achieve Kenya’s development goals, and the Bank remains committed to helping to identify “bankable” deals. 39. Partnerships with other development partners remain important to the WBG in Kenya. The Development Partner Coordination Group (DCG) involves a monthly meeting of heads of mission and agencies and is currently chaired jointly by the World Bank Country Director and the Swedish Ambassador. Regular attendees include all of the traditional bilateral agencies, as well as the Bank, the IMF, AfDB, the EU, and the UN; non-traditional donors (Brazil, China, and India) have also been invited, but attend irregularly. DCG discussions focus on high-level issues, including (over the past few years) Kenya’s economic prospects as well as its political challenges, which will receive more attention in the run-up to the next elections. The Aid Effectiveness Group (AEG) is the key mechanism for donor-government coordination at the technical level: it is co-chaired by the Ministry of Finance, and typically involves deputy heads of mission. Starting in June 2009, the Bank also tried to establish a regularly-scheduled Development Partnership Forum (DPF) that would bring together government leaders as well as ambassadors and heads of development agencies to discuss the overall government program as 12 well as key priorities for joint donor-government implementation in the coming 6-12 months. The DPF met in November 2009, June and November 2010, and in a technical “pre”-DPF meeting in June 2011, but the Government cancelled the November 2011 meeting for internal reasons. The next meeting is now expected to take place in May or June 2012. 40. Implementation of the GAC agenda will have to be further enhanced, building on lessons learned (both negative and positive). Integrity issues in some of the Bank’s projects have pushed the Bank to develop new approaches to project design and implementation support. Given that corruption risks appear currently to be concentrated on the small portion of the portfolio with decentralized expenditures, a Kenya Governance and Anti-Corruption (GAC) committee has been established within the Bank team to monitor ongoing and planned operations for effective anti-corruption measures. In light particularly of the IDA findings on KESSP and the Western Kenya CDD project and the INT findings on Arid Lands, IDA projects with decentralized expenditures are now placing enhanced attention on: (i) improved project record- keeping; (ii) improved management information systems and reporting; (iii) enhanced supervision, including randomized site visits and geo-mapping; (iv) continual third-party monitoring, involving qualified fiduciary agencies in selective cases; (v) stronger social accountability, with more effective information disclosure as well as complaints and grievance handling mechanisms; (vi) reduction or elimination of expenditure categories that are highly prone to abuse; and (vii) recruitment of project staff, where needed, through professional agencies that will control for inappropriate associations. Even though these efforts will undoubtedly help to guard the Bank’s monies, the ultimate objective remains to strengthen country governance systems and make sure corruption risks are reduced with respect to government’s own expenditures. To that end, the government’s Internal Audit Department (with INT support) will conduct from April an expanded forensic audit of the Arid Lands project, though coverage may not be complete due to the high levels of insecurity in north-eastern Kenya resulting from clan-fighting, Somali refugee movements, and the presence of al Shabaab. In addition, at the Treasury’s request, IDA is working with MoF to devise a new government policy on decentralized expenditures, incorporating lessons from experience with the Bank portfolio. C. Implementation Progress 41. As planned, implementation of the CPS brought a new way of doing business to the Bank’s engagement in Kenya. Over the last three years, average project size increased from about US$50 million to US$115 million, excluding regional projects, and it is still increasing. In addition, average disbursements increased from about US$65 million per year over FY02-07 to US$241 million in FY11. A strong effort has also been made to take a more programmatic and longer-term approach. Recognizing that Kenya’s key development challenges will take decades of concerted effort to address fully, lending and financing are now focusing increasingly on identifying, initiating and implementing programs on a national transformative scale, to be implemented over 10 or more years. To this end, projects are being prepared in key sectors (energy, transport, water, urban and social protection) in parallel, with earlier projects supporting the preparatory work (e.g., analysis, feasibility studies, design work) needed to enable later projects to get a quick start. As of June 2011, the indicative IDA16 envelope for Kenya is SDR1,144 million, including a final FY12 allocation of SDR397.6 million. Subsequently, an additional $90 million of Crisis Response Window funding was approved, indicatively, to support drought-mitigation activities in light of the Horn of Africa drought in 2011. 13 42. While a few planned IDA projects were cancelled, most are on track, albeit with some delays. Planned projects that were not delivered include the third phase of Arid Lands and a second phase of the Education Sector Support Project: in both cases, these successor projects were cancelled due to integrity issues in their predecessors. In addition, an FY11 effort to prepare a DPL was only partially successful: while the prior actions were mostly completed, some donors expressed unwillingness to support the DPL until they were satisfied that the ICC prosecutions, implementation of the Constitution, and free, fair and peaceful elections were on track or, in the case elections, completed. Annex 3 shows the planned and the actual lending program, as well as the proposed lending program for the remainder of the CPS period. 43. A further consolidation of the current program is underway, both for knowledge and for lending. Program selectivity will take into account lessons learned thus far in CPS implementation, with a strong focus on: (i) achieving development solutions in areas where knowledge or lending will take place; (ii) engaging with relevant issues where the Bank has the capacity to provide value; (iii) responding to Government demand and commitment; (iv) achieving complementarity to other aspects of the program; and (v) enhancing partnerships with other development partners, civil society, and private sector. 44. The current IDA portfolio has 21 projects with net commitments of US$2.4 billion and seven regional projects with net commitments of US$386 million. The undisbursed balance as of March 2012 was about US$1.67 billion. Key sectors include: transport (33 percent), energy (21 percent), water and urban (15 percent), and health (13 percent). There are two problem projects. Kenya’s portfolio performance is reasonable, with key performance indicators above AFR and Bank-wide averages, though lagging disbursements are an issue. With new commitments averaging US$540 million per year, the portfolio grew by U$1.1 billion over FY10-11, with large new investments in the energy, roads, and urban sectors. There are 64 active Trust Funds (TF), with a total commitment of about US$81 million. This is a relatively small TF portfolio for a country the size of Kenya, but further analysis is required to reduce fragmentation in Bank-executed TFs and to ensure that recipient-executed TFs are aligned with CPS objectives. The average TF disbursement rate is about 50 percent. The current IDA, regional and TF portfolios are presented in more detail in Annex 5, 6 and 7. 45. In FY11, IFC committed US$172 million, up from US$60 million the previous year. New commitments in FY12 are expected to increase substantially to more than US$400 million, mainly in finance and infrastructure. This includes, as noted above, the first of the jointly supported IPPs plus IFC support alongside IDA to KPLC, the power distribution company, a restructuring of the Rift Valley Railways, bringing in a new operator and new capital, and support to Kenya Airways in their route and fleet expansion. In the financial sector IFC supported a number of banks, including $100 million to Equity Bank, oriented primarily to low- income consumers and micro/small businesses. The IFC Kenya portfolio is presented in more detail in Annex 9. 46. The World Bank Institute (WBI) maintains a large and robust program in the region and much of that work focuses on efforts in Kenya supporting capacity development and governance. As the program in the region develops, WBI is building on synergies with the IDA program to support Open Budget Data, improved transparency in PFM, Mapping for 14 Results, and increased social accountability through programs with the media, civil society and parliaments. Given the large lending effort, WBI work also complements ongoing activities in support of climate change, urban development, public private partnerships and improvements in health sector delivery. D. Changes to the Results Framework 47. While the CPS results framework remains robust, a few changes are being introduced to improve its realism. (i) Three (out of 30) CPS outcome indicators are being replaced with new indicators that better capture the Bank’s contribution to CPS outcomes. This does not constitute a major change, especially since most new indicators are derived from the same projects as the previous indicators. (ii) CPS pillar 2, reducing inequality and social exclusion, is being merged with pillar 3, managing resource constraints and environmental challenges. Together they now comprise a new CPS pillar 2, reducing inequality and strengthening resilience. This change improves the alignment of the CPS with the Africa Region’s strategy, which was finalized one year after the CPS. Specifically, it improves alignment of the new pillar 2 of the CPS with pillar 2 of the Africa Strategy, vulnerability and resilience, which addresses macroeconomic and idiosyncratic shocks such as natural disasters, disease, food shortages, conflict, political violence, and climate change. (iii) Another “change” includes the addition of a governance “pillar” to the results framework. Governance was already identified as a cross-cutting objective in the CPS, but it was felt that highlighting it within the results framework would enhance its prominence. (iv) A specific CPS outcome on climate change was dropped, as it was mainly associated with a project (Arid Lands) that was delayed due to corruption issues in the predecessor operation. That said, climate-sensitive indicators have instead been added across the results framework to better capture its multi-sectoral nature. Annex 2 describes changes to the CPS results framework in more detail. V. Risks 48. While the risks already identified in the CPS remain relevant, the manifestation of those risks and therefore their impact on the Bank’s program have changed. For example, while the CPS identified the risks to global economic shocks, Kenya has shown more vulnerability than anticipated and in 2011 the Bank’s policy dialogue had unexpectedly to focus on the basic need to maintain macroeconomic stability. Another external shock already identified in the CPS was the country’s vulnerability to droughts. A recent drought impact assessment found that drought-related damages and losses cost the economy a cumulative US$12 billion over 2008-11. The Bank embraced those findings while working on drought management measures through various sector projects and within its policy dialogue. While the CPS also emphasized security issues, the Kenyan army’s incursion into Somalia in 2011 and its pending merger with the African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) further impacts Bank engagement in areas infiltrated by al Shaabab. The CPS also acknowledged that the program will be subject to fiduciary risks, and this continues to be the case. The program is now able to build on INT and IAD findings to implement anti-corruption measures across the portfolio, which should help to mitigate those risks. 49. The upcoming elections pose the potential risk of violence, though the Kenyan political system has matured significantly since the violent aftermath of the December 2007 elections. The ICC prosecution of four high-level government officials charged with committing 15 crimes against humanity during the post-election violence of 2007-08 has sent a strong message that the incitation of violence will attract repercussions. The Government has also passed new hate speech laws and prosecuted violators of that law. Moreover, the August 2010 referendum on the new Constitution, conducted by a newly-constituted independent electoral commission, was conducted peacefully and professionally. At the same time, security forces have been retrained, and stakeholders in Kenya are making concerted efforts to thwart incipient activity that could lead to widespread violence. Even so, the possibility that such violence will occur at the time of the elections remains high, as most elections in Kenya in the era of multiparty democracy have involved some violence. If violence occurs, it is likely negatively to affect project implementation, as in 2007-08, when various Bank-supported activities had to come to a halt in the violence-affected areas. 50. The change in government that must occur through the next elections also brings some risk of policy reversals. Although Kenya’s largest political parties and likely presidential frontrunners agree on the broad development agenda, as set out in Vision 2030 and supported by the CPS, the risk of policy reversal remains. In particular, fiscal pressure and weak economic growth could strengthen the political clout of parliamentarians and other stakeholders who have continued to lobby for distortionary policy measures, such as introducing price controls on fuel, maize and other basic commodities, or capping the interest rates charged by banks. If such measures were to be enacted by parliament (as has happened even in the current administration), and the executive did not continue to demonstrate the policy restraint that has served Kenya so well over the last decade, macroeconomic management and subsequently growth could decline sharply, erasing many of the gains of the past. The same is true for areas in which the country made unexpected recent progress, such as the open data initiative and strengthened audit capacity: recent gains have been dramatic, but are not yet deeply entrenched and so could be relatively easily reversed. To mitigate these risks, the Bank will continue to work closely with like-minded officials in the central bank and the Ministry of Finance and also continue to focus analytical work (including just-in-time pieces as well as the biannual Kenya Economic Update) highlighting positive and negative developments as well as key emerging risks. 16 Annex 1: Updated Results Framework for the Kenya CPS FY10-FY13 Vision 2030 Objectives CPS Progress Report Status CPS Milestones and Status WBG Program and Key Indicators CPS Pillar 1: Unleashing Kenya’s Growth Potential Private Sector CPS Outcome: Improved business  Time to issue and register construction Ongoing: FLSTAP (closes March 2013), Development environment and competitiveness permits falls. Baseline (2009): 120 MSME (closes June 2012), Kenya MTP Objective: A days, Target (2013): 90 days in pilot Investment Climate Program (Regulatory  Kenya’s Doing Business ranking vibrant and globally municipalities. Source: DB surveys. Reform, Special Economic Zone, Sub- improves. Baseline (2009): 95, Target competitive financial No Progress. [125 days (June 2011)] national Doing Business), AMSME, (2013) 78. Source: Doing Business. Off sector driving high levels Municipal Program, WIN and ESMID. Track. [109 (June 2011)]  Time to register property drops. of savings and Kenya’s Pipeline: Nairobi Metro Services Project Baseline (2009): 64 days, Target (2013): investment need  Access to finance increases Baseline (FY12), Kenya Infrastructure 45 days. Source: DB surveys. No  Drive increases in (2009): 40.5%, Target (2013) 55%. Finance/PPP APL (FY13), Kenya Progress. [64 (June 2011)] efficiency and depth Source: Biennial FinAccess surveys. Subnational Investment Climate through selected Some Progress. [FinAccess survey will  Outstanding issues in corporate bond Program, IFC investment and advisory reforms be updated in FY13. Proxy indicators market increase. Baseline (2009): <1% services for financial intermediaries and  Broaden access to that show progress are: Number of of GDP, target (2013): 3% of GDP. MFIs, Credit Reference Bureau Program financial services, deposit accounts has increased from Source: Capital Markets Authority data. (FY10-13), Regional DPO on regional including formalizing 2.55m in 2005 to 14.7 million at end of Good Progress. [2.8% in 2012] integration (trade), Growth Poles Project informal finance and August 2011 (including deposit taking (FY14)  Volume of Bank support: institutional extend access to MFIs); branch network increased from AAA: Kenya Economic Update (FY10- development–microfinance rises microfinance 534 in 2005 to 1,113 end of August 14), PER (1st done in FY10, 2nd for (amount). Baseline (June 2009):  Deepen capital markets 2011, with sharper increase in rural areas FY12), Governance ESW, Growth US$491,319, target (June 2012): by raising institutional (152%); 7,828 agents approved as of end Diagnostic Notes, FSAP update 2010, US$5,750,000. Source: MSME Project Post-FSAP update (mortgage market, capital and expanding August 2010.] data. Good Progress. [US$3.9 million] bond and equity markets spreads analysis; access to finance,  Improve the business  Increased formalization of financial FY10-12), Tourism: Polishing the jewel environment in critical sector institutions Baseline (2008): (FY10), FPD Policy notes (FY10–11), areas, such as licensing SACCOs licensed: none; Deposit Taking Insolvency and Creditor Rights ROSC and security Microfinance (DTMs) Institutions: none; (FY12), Doing Business Report (FY11–  Implement efficiency- Good Progress. SACCOs: [83 licensed 14), Integrated Growth Poles/competitive enhancing reforms in issued] DTMs [6 licensed] partnership initiative (FY11), the sector. Manufacturing exports analytics (FY11),  Credit Information Bureaux licensed and Subnational Doing Business (1st done in operational for banks and extended to FY10, 2nd for FY12), Kenya Investment MTDs and SACCOs; positive Climate Program (FY10-13), Investment information collected. Good Progress [2 Climate Assessment (FY13). bureaux licensed; 950,000 credit reports Regional: Regional Tourism ESW accessed -only negative information and (FY11), Regional Study on SME for banks. Focus on positive information Financing (FY13). and extending coverage to SACCOs and MTDs included in Finance Bill 2012, pending implementation] 17 Vision 2030 Objectives CPS Progress Report Status CPS Milestones and Status WBG Program and Key Indicators Infrastructure MTP Objective: CPS Outcome: Improved core Deploying world class infrastructure, with deeper regional infrastructure facilities integration and services Transport: Transport: Transport: Ongoing:  Strengthen the  Northern Corridor road in Kenya in Transport Sector Support Project (FY11),  Roads rehabilitated and constructed institutional and fair or good condition rises Northern Corridor Transport (km). Good Progress. [Over 200 km regulatory framework (percentage). Baseline (2009): 54%, Improvement Project (FY04, FY09), East rehabilitated and in use as of June for infrastructure target (2013): 80%. Source: University Africa Trade and Transport Facilitation 2011 (Northern Corridor Project).] development of Nairobi Enterprises and Services Project (Regional FY06), Kenya  Raise efficiency and data. Good Progress. [70%  Security arrangements at the port of Investment Climate Program (Trade quality of transport (December 2010)] Mombasa put into place and the one- Facilitation), Rift Valley Railways (IFC infrastructure and stop-shop operational. Source: East Portfolio).  Average time to travel by road from services Africa Trade and Transport the port of Mombasa to Malaba  Enhance private sector Facilitation Project reports. Good Pipeline: (border of Uganda) falls. Baseline participation in the Progress. [Implementation of National Urban Transport Improvement (2009): annual average 18 hours, target provision of integrated security system at port of (FY13), East Africa Regional Transport (2013) 12 hours. Source: University of infrastructure facilities Mombasa ongoing, including training Links Project (Regional FY13); IFC Nairobi Enterprises and Services data, and services. of all staff on security matters.] support for Kenya Airways (FY12) reported in NCTIP reports. Good Progress/Achieved. [9 hours  Direct flights between Nairobi and the Proposed new AAA: Construction Mombasa-Timboroa (750km of about United States in operation. Source: Industry Study (FY13), Port 920 km) (June 2011)] data on airlines schedules available on Development Study (FY13), Impact of the internet. Slow Progress. [Jomo  Annual freight carried by Kenya- Devolution on Road Development Kenyatta International Airport cleared Uganda railway rises. Baseline (FY14) by US Transportation Security (2009): 1.56 million tons, target (2013) Administration for direct flights from more than 2.3 million tons. Source: US to Kenya, but wider security risks Kenya Railway Corporation/Rift continue to prohibit actual flights.] Valley Railways. Currently n/a. [Team will need to provide data  National Construction Authority update.] established and functional. Source: Northern Corridor project reports.  Time of cross-border trade declines Achieved. [Bill passed by Parliament (baseline (2009): 27 days to export a and signed into law by the President.] container, 25 days to import a container Target (2013): 21 days to  Kenya-Uganda railway concession export a container, 20 days to import a functioning Source: East African Trade container. Source: Doing Business and Transport Facilitation Project surveys). Some Progress. [26 days for reports. Some Progress. [Concession export; 24 days for import (June restructured, with efforts underway to 2011)] recapitalize railway and professionalize management.] 18 Vision 2030 Objectives CPS Progress Report Status CPS Milestones and Status WBG Program and Key Indicators Energy: Energy: Energy: Ongoing: Electricity Expansion Project (FY10), Energy Sector Recovery Project  Rural electrification  Number of electricity connections rises.  Transmission lines constructed or (FY05, FY09), Lighting Africa (TA) Baseline (June 2009): 1,267,198 rehabilitated under the Electricity  Energy access scale-up. (FY09), IFC Tsavo Power Portfolio connections, target (June 2013): Expansion Project. Baseline (2010): 0, Project, IPPS MEGA. additional 30,000 (Electricity Expansion target (2013): 40 km. Source: Project Project) and 250,000 (Energy Sector reports. Some Progress. [Bidding Pipeline: Private Sector Power Recovery Project). Source: KPLC documents for transmission lines Generation PRG (FY12), Lake Turkana Reports/Project data. Good Progress prepared, supervisory consultant hired, Wind Project (FY12), Kenya Ethiopia [350,000 households under the ESRP construction expected to begin Feb Interconnector (FY12), IFC Investment in September 2011] 2012.] KPLC and IPPs (FY12-13), Scaling-up  Transmission and distribution losses  Distribution lines (66kV, 33 kV, 11kV) Renewable Energy Project (FY13), IPPs decline. Baseline (June 2009): 16.3% of constructed or rehabilitated under the MEGA. energy purchased, target (2013): 15.2%. Energy Sector Recovery Project and New: Power Development (FY15) Source: KPLC Reports. Slow Progress. Electricity Expansion Project. Baseline [16.2% in September 2011] (Dec. 31, 2009): 515, target (2013): Ongoing AAA:TA portfolio to 1,775 km. Source: Projects’ reports. strengthen the capacity of sector entities  Five new Independent Power Projects Good Progress. [1,200km in September for improved sector regulation, planning, (IPP)-at least two of which are 2011] and operation; wind/geothermal-reached financial Proposed new AAA: Oil and Gas Study closure. [New Indicator] (FY13) Water and sanitation: Water: Ongoing: IDA: Water and Sanitation Services Improvement Project (WaSSIP;  Upgrade water supply  Number of people in project area with  Transfer of water and sanitation assets FY08), WSP Global Partnership on systems in all urban access to improved water sources from ministry and local authorities to Output-Based Aid (GPOBA): Kenya areas and (baseline (June 2009): 8 million, target the water services boards completed. Microfinance for Water Project augment/expand rural (2012) 9.5 million. Source: Water Source: WaSSIP reports. Some Pipeline: IDA: WaSSIP AF (FY12), water supplies Regulation Information System, with Progress. [Technical work completed] WSP/GPOBA: Nairobi Sanitation data reported in the WaSSIP reports).  Expand sewage  Number of new piped household water (FY12), Water Development and Climate Good Progress. [However, project ISR coverage. connections that are resulting from the Resilience Project (FY13); WSP, IFC, tracks percentage of people with access project intervention (baseline (2010): 0, IDA: Embu and Malindi water services rather than number of people. Target (mid-2013): 42,300. Source: providers gain access to commercial Percentage increased from 27% to 50% Water and Sanitation Project data. Good finance for expanded supply (FY12), in 2007-2011.] Progress. [36,388 new piped household WSP finance facility for urban water  Percentage of people in project area connections that are resulting from the service providers (FY13); Nairobi Urban with access to adequate sewerage project interventions in 2011.] Sanitation project (FY13) services or safe sanitation rises AAA: Enhancing Women’s Participation  Amount of market finance accessed to (baseline (2007): 10%, target (2012): in Water Governance structures; TA for expand water supply services in urban 30%. Source: with data reported in the Commercial Finance Facility for Urban and rural areas. Baseline (2012) US$ WaSSIP reports). Good Progress. [20% Water Supply (WSP, FY12) 1.3 million. Target (2013) US$ 6 in March 2011] million. [New Indicator.] 19 Vision 2030 Objectives CPS Progress Report Status CPS Milestones and Status WBG Program and Key Indicators Information and ICT Ongoing: Communication  Access to Internet services rises Regional Communications Infrastructure  Undersea cable completed. Target: Technology (number of subscribers). Baseline Project/KTCIP; IFC KMIP (IFC Special June 2010. Good Progress/ Achieved. (2007): 1.25 million, target: 3 million. Economic Zone Project); EASSy Cable  Lay under-sea fiber [Three cables completed.] Source: Communications Commission (IFC Portfolio project). optic cable of Kenya data. Achieved. [14.3  Offer government million subscribers; 36.7% of the Pipeline: services online. population with Internet access KTCIP AF (FY12) (December 2010)] Agriculture CPS Outcome: Enhanced agricultural Ongoing:  Harmonized agricultural sector MTP Objective: productivity, with a focus on food KAPAP (FY09); WKCDD; GEF Kenya development strategy and Innovative, security adaptation to climate change in the Arid implementation framework completed commercially-oriented, Lands NRMP (FY07), East Africa  Average yields of selected agricultural and strategy being implemented. competitive, and modern Agricultural Productivity (Regional products in smallholder farming Source: KAPAP reports. Good agricultural sector FY09); IFC Project, GEF-Western Indian systems in project area rise. Baseline Progress/Achieved. [ASDS approved Ocean Marine Highway Dev and Coastal  Increase productivity (2009): maize yields increase by annual by sector ministries and Cabinet in and Marine Contamination Prevention. average of 3%; target (2013): 5%. Nov 2010; implementation begun.]  ASAL development. Source: KAPAP-specific surveys  Farmers’ access to loans from IFC- Pipeline: carried out at mid-term and end of supported financial institutions rises Agriculture Drought Recovery (FY13), project). No update available. (number of farmers), (baseline (2009): Regional Pastoral Project (FY13), IFC [KAPAP Impact Assessment and 0. Source: IFC project reports). Some investment in horticulture and tea sector Baseline survey ongoing, June results Progress. [In advanced negotiations and advisory services for the coffee expected.] with KCB and early negotiations with sector (FY11-13)  Earnings from small holder Equity Bank for $200 million of agricultural activities in project area financing (in aggregate).] AAA: rise. Baseline (2009): net annual Land TA (FY08–10), Agriculture Policy  Agribusinesses access to loans from income: male Ksh 128,270, female Ksh Review, ESW-Rural gender methodology IFC-supported projects (three) or 98,748, target (2013): male 20% and baseline data (co-financed by the through wholesale funding facility increase, female: 25% increase. Gender Action Plan), Western Indian rises. Baseline (2009): 0. IFC project Source: KAPAP-specific surveys. No Ocean Fisheries TA. reports). Some Progress. [Launched update available. [KAPAP Impact an advisory services project to support Assessment and Baseline survey coffee farmers improve yields and ongoing, June results expected.] coffee husbandry through a partnership with ECOM a global commodities trading company. Target is to reach 15,000 farmers in 3 years.] 20 Vision 2030 Objectives CPS Progress Report Status CPS Milestones and Status WBG Program and Key Indicators CPS Pillar 2: Reducing Inequality and Strengthening Resilience Social and CPS Outcome: Better access to health Infrastructure Services care, education, and basic infrastructure services Health Health Ongoing:  Facilities (level 2–3) receiving drugs Vision 2030 Objective: Health Swap (FY10) and Additional  People with access to a basic package of and medical supplies on time (%). Equitable and affordable Financing (FY12); East Africa Public health, nutrition, or population services Target (2013) 20% increase from healthcare system of the Health Laboratory Networking Project rises. Baseline (2009): 0, target (2013): baseline. Source: Health SWAp data. highest possible quality (FY10); Total War Against HIV/AIDS (18,300,000). Source: Health SWAp Good Progress. [Procurement, social (FY07); JSDF grant for traditional  Provide a functional, reports. Good Progress. [During FY10- accountability pilots and supervision medicine, IFC Health in Africa Initiative. efficient and sustainable 11, over 25.3 million individuals visits underway.] health infrastructure directly benefited from the project and  Health personnel receiving training in Pipeline: network over half of them (14.2 million) were financial management and procurement New: Medicine Regulatory Harmonization females.]  Reduce health (number). Baseline (2010): 0, target (FY12), Additional Financing for disease inequalities and reverse  Eligible children under-one year fully (2013): 2,000. Source: Health SWAp control programs to meet Global Fund downward trends. immunized nationwide (totals). Baseline data. Good Progress/Achieved. [4,648 shortfalls (FY13) (2010): 1.2 million, Target (2013): 13 staff in 265 districts and 664 health million. Source: Health SWAp data. centers received training in planning and AAA: Good Progress. [5.8 million in 2011.] financial management of Health Sector Health PER (FY11), Health Financing Services Fund. Training for dispensary (FY12) (IFC)  HSSF facilities meeting core financial staff almost completed in 4 provinces Proposed new AAA: Devolution Access management requirements rise. and ongoing in 4 others.] to Service Delivery (FY13/14), Health (percent) Baseline (2010): 0%, Target Service Delivery Indicators (FY13), (2013): 50%. Source: Health Sector  Number of people benefiting from health Human Resources in Health Study (FY13), Services Fund. Good Progress. [20% services from 30 IFC-supported private Multi-sector Nutrition Assessment (FY12) in 2011.] healthcare companies rises. Baseline (2009): 0. Source: IFC project reports.  Proportion of youth aged 15-24 Some Progress. [Limited information, reporting condom use in the last sexual but preliminary survey underway; encounter with a non-regular partner strategy to be developed to measure (of those reporting sexual intercourse progress over next year. Through two with a nonregular partner in the last 12 healthcare private equity vehicles months). Baseline (2003): F=24%, (EVHA and IFHA), IFC has financed M=47%, Target (2013) F=55%, two healthcare companies in Kenya, M=75%. Sources: TOWA project data. namely Nairobi Women's Hospital and Good Progress [New Indicator; AAR. Another three institutions are at F=39.5%, M=64.6% in 2009.] various stages of the due diligence process and financing should be in place in the coming months.] 21 Vision 2030 Objectives CPS Progress Report Status CPS Milestones and Status WBG Program and Key Indicators Education Pipeline: Global Partnership for MTP Objective: Improve Education  Net enrollment rate in primary Education (TF) access and equity to education rises (disaggregated by New: Education SWAp, including ECD  Primary completion rate rises (percent). education at all levels gender). Baseline (2006): 83% 2006, follow-up (FY13/14) Baseline (2008): 79.5%, target (2012): target: 95%. Source: Ministry of AAA: Education PER (FY10), Education  Raise enrollment and 85%; and in Northeastern, baseline Education. Good Progress. [92.9% in PETS and Service Delivery Indicators transition rates 36.5%, target, 45%. Source: Ministry of 2009] (FY12), System Assessment Education. Good Progress. [83% in  Improve quality of Benchmarking for Results (SABER): Early 2009; Northeast n/a]  TIVET Authority functioning. Source: education at all levels. Childhood (FY12), School Health and  Primary to secondary education KESSP reports. Good Progress. Nutrition (FY12); Teacher Performance transition rate rises (percent). Baseline [ Interim Authority functioning, Bill with and Student Learning (FY12), Realizing (2008) 60%, target (2012), 75%. Cabinet pending final approval.] the Youth Dividend (FY12), Innovative Source: Ministry of Education. Good  Sector governance and management Financing for Higher Education (FY12) Progress. [66.9% in 2009] strengthened. Source: KESSP Proposed New AAA: Measuring Skills Governance and Anti-Corruption and and Knowledge for Greater Growth and  University education gross enrollment Risk Policy Management Action Plan. Competitiveness (FY13), Integrated rate rises (percent). Baseline (2008): Slow/No Progress. [Process underway Education Data Management (FY13), 3%, target (2012): 5% (reaching Sub- but very difficult dialogue due to Teachers (FY13). Saharan Africa average). Source: Ministry of Education. Good Progress findings of fraud and corruption in [4% in 2009.]. sector.] Slum Upgrading Slum upgrading Ongoing: Slum Upgrading/Informal MTP Objective: Settlements Improvement (FY11); Pro-  Urban slum residents who gain access  Citywide slum upgrading initiatives Adequate and decent poor component of WASSIP, FIRST to improved infrastructure services commence in five cities. Source: housing in a sustainable Shelter Afrique, ESMID, FLSTAP. under the Informal Settlements Kenya Informal Settlement environment Pipeline: Nairobi Metropolitan Services Improvement Project (number Improvement Project reports. Data not Project (FY12).  Facilitate the beneficiaries, disaggregated by available. [Project effective since AAA: FPD Dialogue, FSAP update/part development and access gender). Baseline: 0, Target: 100,000. June 30, 2011.] 2 – housing finance (FY11/12). to affordable and Source: project surveys. Data not Proposed new AAA: Demography of adequate housing available. [Project effective since Urban Slums June 2011.] Vulnerable Groups CPS Outcome: Establishing Ongoing: MTP Objective: Gender comprehensive scalable social Orphans and Vulnerable Children Cash  Integrated social protection policy equity in power and protection mechanisms Transfer Project (FY09), Youth approved by cabinet and related action resource distribution,  Interns employed or self-employed Empowerment (FY10). plan under implementation. Source: improved livelihoods for Pipeline: immediately after internship, and a year OVC Cash Transfer Project reports. vulnerable groups, and a Integrated Social Protection Program after internship completion rises Good Progress. [Cabinet Memorandum responsible, globally (percent, to be disaggregated by (FY13) signed by the Minister. Revised draft competitive and gender). Baseline (2010): 0, Target: AAA: strategy to be sent to Cabinet in March.] prosperous youth 35% (2013). Source: Project-specific Social Protection Sector Review (FY12), surveys. Some Progress. [The first  Establishment of a single registry to Building Social Protection Systems in  Increase opportunity internship cycle is still in progress cover key cash transfer programs. [New Kenya (RSR grant for advisory activities) 22 Vision 2030 Objectives CPS Progress Report Status CPS Milestones and Status WBG Program and Key Indicators (October 2011).] milestone.] FY11-13).  Provide financial support to all vulnerable  Beneficiary households receiving groups. predictable cash transfers rises under the Cash Transfer for OVC (number). Baseline (2009): 0, target (end- 2013): 50,000. Source: OVC Project specific surveys. Good Progress. [149,260 (April 2011)] Environment CPS Outcome: Improved management Ongoing:  National Drought Contingency Fund MTP Objective: of key natural resources GEF Adaptation to Climate Change in established and disbursing funding to Enhancing access to Arid Lands, WKCDD (FY07), Natural  Area of forests managed according to address emergencies. Source: Arid clean, secure, and Resources Management Project (FY07), approved plans rises. Baseline (end Lands 2 project reports. Not achieved. sustainable environment, Lake Victoria Environmental 2009): 21,000 hectares, target (2013): [Project was cancelled due to water and sanitation Management Phase II (Regional FY09); 300,000 hectares. Source: NRM corruption charges in predecessor Coastal Development Project (FY11).  Increase fresh water Project surveys. Good Progress. project.] availability and [141,000 has in 2011]  Drought management system in place Pipeline: establish a monitoring and functioning at the district and Water Development and Climate program for water national level. Source: Arid Lands 2 Resilience Project (FY13); IFC  Improve water storage project reports. Not achieved. [Project engagement with Lake Naivasha capacity was cancelled due to corruption watershed stakeholders (FY12-13) charges in predecessor project.]  Conserve strategic Proposed new AAA: natural resources in a  Early flood warning system established Land Access, Tenure and Conflict sustainable manner and functioning in Western Kenya (gender disaggregated data included) without compromising [New Indicator] (FY14). economic growth  Draft Basin-wide water and fisheries  Map ASAL and high management agreement prepared. risk disaster zones. Baseline (2009): 0, target (2013): 100. Source: Lake Victoria Environment Management 2 Project surveys. No/Slow Progress. [no progress, but some activities underway] CPS Governance Pillar (Cross-Cutting) New CPS Governance Outcomes Public Sector CPS Outcome: Improved Ongoing: Institutional Reform and  Annual procurement audits indicate Governance Transparency and Accountability Capacity Building project (FY06); improvement in compliance with MTP Objective: A  Financial statements prepared on time Municipal Program (FY10), procurement regulations. Baseline citizen-focused and in accordance with acceptable Transparency Communications (2005): procurement not covered as a results-oriented accounting standards through IFMIS Infrastructure Project (KTCIP) (FY08), focus area for internal audit, target (end institution (central government) and LAIFOMS FLSTAP (closes March 2013), GPF (TF), 2013): internal audit on procurement  Promote transparency, (local government). Central baseline STATCAP 23 Vision 2030 Objectives CPS Progress Report Status CPS Milestones and Status WBG Program and Key Indicators accountability, (2005): 0. Source: Institutional carried out in 90% of ministries. Pipeline: Nairobi Metropolitan Services participation, and the Reform Capacity Building Project Source: Inst. Reform Capacity Building Project (FY12), KTCIP AF (FY12) rule of law. reports. Municipal baseline (2009): 0 Project reports). Partially Achieved. New: Governance Partnerships Facility Target (2013): 6. Source: Municipal [Guidelines for annual procurement (TF) support to supply-side (PFM and Program reports). Central: Not audits developed and regulations in PSR) and demand-side (information Achieved. [Purchasing, Accounts place, but implementation and dissemination and accountability system) Payable and General Ledger financial compliance are weak.] reforms reporting not yet undertaken using Ongoing AAA: Country Procurement  Municipalities have prioritized capital IFMIS. Other modules of IFMIS have Assessment Review, Insolvency and investment plans linked to strategic not been operationalized.]; Municipal: Creditor Rights ROSC (FY12), Policy plans. Baseline: 0, target: 6. Source: Data not available. Notes (M&E Assessment, Social Municipal Program reports. Data not  PEFA scores of A/B rise. Baseline Accountability); PEFA (FY12/13) available. (2008): 12 of 28, target (2013): 15 of Proposed new AAA: Governance 28. Source: Biennial PEFA surveys). Assessment, Portfolio Review of Data not available. [There was no Decentralization, Access to Information PEFA in 2010.] and Data, FM related TA and AAA,  External audit reports prepared and Accounting and Auditing, Sector FM published in a timely fashion in assessments, Procurement reforms, accordance with Public Audit Act Enhanced Capacity for CSOs and Media 2003. Partially Achieved. [Audit is being carried out and in compliance with the Kenya National Audit Office (KNAO) Act, 2003. Audit Committees established, but not all functioning and local government authorities audit reports are in arrears.] 24 Annex 2: Updated and Revised CPS Outcomes Original CPS Indicators Updated and Revised Indicators/Outcomes CPS Outcome: Improved core infrastructure, with deeper regional integration. Energy  Five new Independent Power Projects (IPP), at least  New Indicator. Indicator captures new operations and two of which are green, reached financial closure. focus on IPPs, including climate-change sensitivity. Water  Area under irrigation in project area rises. Baseline  Replaced. Indicator is not aligned with main sector (2007): 270 ha. Target (mid-2013): 3,500 ha focus. Under the NRM project, there has been good progress under this indicator, with works contracts for two major irrigation investments in advanced stages.  Amount of market finance accessed to expand water  New Indicator. This milestone directly supports the supply services in urban and rural areas. Baseline increased access outcome indicator, as the money is for (2012) US$1.3 million. Target (2013) US$6 million. infrastructure investments. CPS Outcome: Better access to health care, education, and basic infrastructure Health  Health facilities (level 2–3) without tracer drugs for  Replaced. Indicator does not reflect well the Bank’s more than two weeks declines (%). Baseline: 23%. program. In addition, supply of essential drugs under Target (2013): 5%. Source: KEMSA Navison data, the project has not yet started. presented in the Health SWAp Reports.  Proportion of youth aged 15-24 reporting condom use  New Indicator. To reflect part of program focus. in last sexual encounter with a non-regular partner (of those reporting sexual intercourse with a nonregular partner in last 12 months). Baseline (2003): F=24%, M=47%. Target (2013) F=55%, M=75%. Sources: TOWA project data. Good Progress CPS Outcome: Improved management of key natural resources  Cumulative percentage reduction in untreated  Replaced. No to slow Progress. Indicator was replaced effluent disposed by targeted municipalities into by indicator that allows for better measurement of three hotspots of Lake Victoria (%). Baseline progress. (2009): 0%. Target (2013): 10%. Source: Lake Victoria Environment Management 2 Project surveys.  Regional standards for industrial and effluent  New Indicator. Better indicator to capture project discharges into Lake Victoria ready for adoption. progress. Baseline (2009): n/a. Target: standards adopted. CPS Outcome: Adapting to climate change.  CPS outcome indicator not measured.  CPS outcome dropped. Climate-sensitive indicators continue to be measured (and have been added) across results framework to better capture multi-sectorality. CPS Governance Pillar (Cross-Cutting) The CPS identified governance as a cross-cutting area. The CPS Progress Report suggests adding governance as a cross-cutting pillar to the CPS results frameworks. The CPS outcome on strengthening public sector management (previous under the CPS pillar 1: Unleashing Kenya’s Growth Potential) is being changed into Improved Transparency and Accountability.  CPS outcome on strengthening public sector  Reformulated CPS Outcome: Improved Transparency management and improving sub-national governance and Accountability. 25 Annex 3: Ongoing and Proposed Knowledge Program CPS Pillar 1: Unleashing Kenya's Growth Potential Continued/Ongoing  Kenya Economic Updates (FY10-14)  PER (FY12)  Post-FSAP update (FY10-12)  Insolvency and Creditor Risks ROSC (FY12)  Subnational Doing Business (FY12)  Investment Climate Program (FY10-14) and Assessment (FY13)  TA energy sector (capacity strengthening) FY10-14 New  Port Development Study (FY13)  Oil and Gas Study (FY13) CPS Pillar 2: Reducing Inequality and Strengthening Resilience Continued/Ongoing  IFC health financing TA (FY12)  Multi-sector nutrition assessment (FY12)  Education PETS and Service Delivery Indicators (FY12)  School Health and Nutrition (FY12)  Realizing the Youth Dividend (FY12)  Innovative Financing for Higher Education (FY12)  Social Protection Sector Review (FY12)  Building Social Protection Systems in Kenya (RSR grant for advisory activities) FY11-13 New  Poverty Updates (FY13/14)  Devolution Access to Service Delivery (FY13/14)  Health Service Delivery Indicators (FY13)  Human Resources in Health Study (FY13)  Measuring Skills and Knowledge for Greater Growth and Competitiveness (FY13)  Integrated Education Data Management (FY13)  Teacher Performance and Student Learning (FY13) CPS Governance “Pillar” Continued/Ongoing  Decentralization Report  Procurement Assessment Review (FY12)  Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA; FY12/13) New  Access to Information and Data (FY13/14)  County Systems Assessment (FY13)  Judicial Performance (F13/14) 26 Annex 4: Planned versus Actual Lending Program and Pipeline Current status of CPS IDA pipeline (as described in CPS Annex 2) FY CPS Program Planned Planned Comment Amount (US$m) delivered (US$) year IDA CRW* 2010 Electricity Expansion 3 50.0 FY10 Amount lowered by $20m 330.0 - Municipal Program 100.0 FY10 Delivered as planned 100.0 - Youth Empowerment 60.0 FY10 Delivered as planned 60.0 - Health SWAp 100.0 FY11+ Advanced to FY10 157.0 - Subtotal 610.0 647.0 - 2011 Coastal Development 35.0 FY10 Delivered FY11 35.0 - Nairobi Urban Toll Road (NUTR) 1 80.0 FY11+ Toll road cancelled, due to integrity 300.0 - issues concerning concessionaire, but other components supported in substituted Transport Sector Support project Slum Upgrading 100.0 FY11+ Renamed Informal Settlements 100.0 - Improvement; delivered as planned TOWA additional financing n/a FY07 AF to fill GFATM gap 55.0 - Subtotal 315.0 490.0      ‐ 2012 Health SWAp AF n/a n/a AF to address drought emergency - 57.0 Private Sector Power Generation (PRG) 40.0 FY12 Partial risk guarantees 41.5 - Subtotal 41.5 57.0 Note: Status of pipeline projects appearing in Annex 2 of April 2010 CPS but not yet delivered 2012+ Nairobi Metropolitan Services 100.0 FY11+ On track for 12 delivery 300.0 - PPP Infrastructure Finance 100.0 FY11+ On track for FY13 delivery 100.0 - Water Resources Development 00.0 1 FY11+ On track for FY13 delivery; renamed 400.0 - Water Security and Climate Resilience Development Policy Operation 100.0 FY11+ Prior actions completed, but project not - - presented due to country circumstances Arid Lands Resource Management 3 100.0 FY11+ Cancelled, due to corruption findings in - - predecessor project KESSP2 00.0 1 FY11+ Cancelled, due to corruption findings in - - predecessor project Proposed pipeline for remainder of CPS period FY CPS Program Planned Planned Comment Proposed amount delivered amount year IDA CRW 2012 Water and Sanitation Improvement AF 300.0 FY12 Includes response to 2011 drought 280.0 20.0 Nairobi Metropolitan Services 300.0 FY12 Third project in urban series 300.0 - KCTIP AF 39.0 FY12 Includes $14m IDA realllocation 5 5.0 - Northern Corridor Transport AF 43.0 FY12 IDA reallocation of cancelled funds 43.0 - Ethiopia-Kenya Interconnector (regional 131.0 FY12/13 153.0 - project) Subtotal (including approved and regional projects) 872.5 77.0 2013+ Water Security and Climate Resilience 2 50.0 FY13 On track 250.0 - Pastoral Livelihoods Recovery and 25.0 FY13 Part of regional response to 2011 Horn of 25.0 - Resilience (regional project) Africa drought PPP Infrastructure Finance 100.0 FY13+ Subject to PPP pipeline development 100.0 - Judicial Performance Improvement 100.0 FY13+ Revives project postponed in FY09 100.0 - Integrated Social Protection Program 200.0 FY13+ Will incorporate CT-OVC project 200.0 - Scaling-up Renewable Energy 130.0 FY13+ Supported by $50m SREP TF resources 130.0 - Lake Turkana Wind Project (PRG) 20.0 FY13 Partial risk guarantee 20.0 - Nairobi Urban Transport APL 00.0 FY12/13 Will address issues not addressed when 2 200.0 - NUTR was cancelled Subtotal 1,025.0 - * IDA Crisis Response  Window 27 Annex 5: Selected Indicators of Portfolio Performance and Management As Of Date 3/20/2012 Indicator 2009 2010 2011 2012 Portfolio Assessment Number of Projects Under Implementation a 16 19 21 20 Average Implementation Period (years) b 3.3 3.3 3.5 3.8 Percent of Problem Projects by Number a, c 6.3 10.5 4.8 10.0 Percent of Problem Projects by Amount a, c 5.6 8.2 3.7 6.1 Percent of Projects at Risk by Number a, d 25.0 15.8 9.5 20.0 Percent of Projects at Risk by Amount a, d 10.1 11.6 6.6 9.8 Disbursement Ratio (%) e 20.0 18.9 11.9 9.0 Memorandum Item Since FY 80 Last Five FYs Proj Eval by OED by Number 105 3 Proj Eval by OED by Amt (US$ millions) 3,628.8 90.1 % of OED Projects Rated U or HU by Number 58.1 33.3 % of OED Projects Rated U or HU by Amt 52.1 39.9 a. As shown in the Annual Report on Portfolio Performance (except for current FY). b. Average age of projects in the Bank's country portfolio. c. Percent of projects rated U or HU on development objectives (DO) and/or implementation progress (IP d. As defined under the Portfolio Improvement Program. e. Ratio of disbursements during the year to the undisbursed balance of the Bank's portfolio at the beginning of the year: Investment projects only. * All indicators are for projects active in the Portfolio, with the exception of Disbursement Ratio, which includes all active projects as well as projects which exited during the fiscal year. 28 Annex 6: IDA Operations Portfolio Operations Portfolio (IBRD/IDA and Grants) As Of Date 3/20/2012 Closed Projects 134 IBRD/IDA * Total Disbursed (Active) 733.91 of w hich has been repaid 0.00 Total Disbursed (Closed) 539.83 of w hich has been repaid 686.60 Total Disbursed (Active + Closed) 1,273.74 of w hich has been repaid 686.60 Total Undisbursed (Active) 1,650.24 Total Undisbursed (Closed) 1.25 Total Undisbursed (Active + Closed) 1,651.49 Active Projects Difference Between Last PSR Expected and Actual Supervision Rating Disbursements a/ Development Implementation Project ID Project Name Fiscal Year IDA GRANT Undisb. Orig. Frm Rev'd Objectives Progress P083250 Financial & Legal Sec TA S S 2005 18 11.7 10.9 0.6 P091979 KE- Adaptation Climate Change (KACCAL) # # 2010 45.5 P111545 KE-Cash Transfer for OVC (FY09) S S 2009 50 24.2 (3.0) P094692 KE-Coastal CD SIL (FY08) S S 2011 35 35.0 P103037 KE-Electricity SIL (2010) S S 2010 330 323.8 24.5 P083131 KE-Energy Sec Recovery Prj (FY05) S S 2005 160 61.2 (25.7) 5.8 P108845 KE-FMSCEDP (Coastal CD) GEF (FISH) S S 2011 5.0 4.6 P088600 KE-GEF Ag prd & Sust. Land Mgmt(KAPSLMP) MS MS 2011 10.0 8.1 P074091 KE-Health SWAP (FY10) S S 2010 156.8 125.7 (7.4) P113542 KE-Informal Settlements Improvement Proj S S 2011 100 103.6 P066488 KE-Municipal Program (FY10) MS MS 2010 100 93.8 11.9 P085414 KE-Natl STATCAP Dev S S 2007 20.5 12.1 10.7 P082615 KE-Northern Corridor Trnsprt SIL (FY04) S MS 2004 460 263.0 (12.3) 153.7 P095050 KE-NRM SIL (FY07) MS MS 2007 68.5 38.0 15.8 27.4 P081712 KE-Tot War Against HIV/AIDS-TOWA (FY07 S S 2007 135 43.0 18.6 P074106 KE-W Kenya CDD/Flood Mitigation (FY07) MU MS 2007 86 71.4 27.4 P096367 KE-Water & Sanitation Srv Impr (FY08) S S 2008 150 37.3 31.5 P111546 KE-Youth Empowerment Project (FY10) MU MU 2010 60 46.9 12.4 P124109 KE:Transport Sector Support Project S S 2011 300 292.1 P109683 Kenya Agric Productivity & Agribusiness MS MS 2009 82 60.7 22.2 P085007 MSME Competitiveness MS MS 2005 22 6.4 5.1 4.7 Overall Result 2333.8 60.5 1,662.9 133.2 192.2 29 Annex 7: Kenya Regional Portfolio Tot Undisb Disb in FY Net Comm Latest DO MTR Date Approval Latest IP Resp CC Tot Disb Signing Closing Proj ID. Effectv Age yrs Project Name Date, Date, Date, Date Amt Rev TTL Bal P112688 Eastern Africa Agricultural Productivity AFTAR LEGESSE 6/11/2009 7/22/2009 2/16/2010 # 2/27/2015 MS MS 2.4 30.0 9.0 0.1 23.0 P072202 3A-GEF SWIO Fisheries SIL (FY07) AFTEN VINCENT 6/28/2007 10/9/2007 10/9/2007 3/17/2011 11/30/2011 MS MS 4.3 12.0 10.0 5.7 1.9 P100406 3A-Lake Victoria Phase II APL 1 (FY09) AFTEN BRAGA 3/3/2009 5/8/2009 7/30/2009 # 6/30/2013 MS MU 2.7 30.0 6.0 1.0 24.0 P112456 Regional Trade Facilitation Project II AFTFW VIS 6/14/2011 # # # 4/30/2017 # # 0.4 25.0 25.4 0 5.5 P111556 3A-East Afr Publ Hlth Laborat Net (FY10) AFTHE SCHNEIDMAN 5/25/2010 6/22/2010 9/7/2010 # 3/30/2016 S S 1.4 23.5 4.5 2.0 20.0 P079734 3A-E Afr Trade & Transp Facil (FY06) AFTTR WAITHAKA 1/24/2006 3/6/2006 6/5/2006 12/8/2008 9/30/2014 MS MS 5.8 150.6 72.8 1.6 59.0 P094103 3A-Telecommunications APL (FY07) TWICT NETO 3/29/2007 5/22/2007 8/21/2007 1/10/2011 12/31/2013 MS MS 4.6 114.4 48.9 0.0 71.9 385.5 176.6 10.4 205.3 Grand Total 2,779.8 885.7 140.6 1,903.8 30 Annex 8: Kenya Trust Fund Portfolio Funds Trust Project Net Grant Avail. Trust Fund Name FY Disb. Disb. to Fund # Number Amount Balance Date TF09821 IDF Grant for Building Capacity of Diaspora Affairs Directorate in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs P121227 500.00 200.00 200.00 300.00 TF01135 Capacity Building for Agricultural Carbon Project Development P121368 120.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 TF09561 Gender Action Plan (GAP) 2009 P109683 150.00 108.69 149.92 0.08 TF09569 EUFCRRF Kenya P109683 189.96 58.57 192.76 1.15 TF09880 Readiness mechanisms for climate smart agriculture P129610 970.00 77.50 87.05 214.25 TF09161 GEF FSP-KENYA:AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY AND SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT P088600 10,000.00 1,870.04 1,870.04 8,129.96 TF09646 Enhancing Agricultural Productivity Project P109683 24,226.23 5,251.23 25,407.32 236.47 TF09857 W1-The Empirics of Governance P124003 820.00 85.80 99.65 5.61 TF01091 KENYA: Assessment of Geothermal Development Company (GDC) for Enhanced Access to P129204 46.75 2.75 2.75 44.00 TF09670 GPOBA (W1): Kenya Electricity Expansion P121332 181.00 31.91 145.75 35.25 TF09887 Kenya SREP investment plan preparation P125539 164.35 63.01 159.91 0.32 TF09916 GPOBA (W3 Prep): Kenya Electricity Expansion Project P125388 183.77 -6.46 0.00 183.77 TF09666 KE- Rural Biodiesel project P120038 135.74 39.69 107.55 28.19 TF09352 Support to Community Based Farm Forestry Enterprises in Semi-Arid Areas in Kenya (Bank- P095050 56.50 5.50 10.49 46.01 TF09308 GEF MSP: KENYA: GRANT FOR WILDLIFE CONSERVATION LEASING DEMONSTRATION P083172 727.27 124.15 588.49 138.78 TF09352 Support to Community Based Farm Forestry Enterprises in Semi-Arid Areas in Kenya P095050 1,936.38 292.81 886.38 1,049.99 TF09757 Kenya Coastal Development Project P108845 5,000.00 258.54 258.54 4,741.46 TF09950 PPIAF Kenya Infrastructure Finance/PPP project P121019 124.24 7.38 7.38 86.86 TF01006 Kenya: #10160 Strengthening Accounting & Auditing Legal Framework P126674 106.25 0.00 0.00 71.25 TF09041 CAPACITY BUILDING OF RURAL TRADITIONAL HERBALISTS- BANK-EXECUTED P074091 59.88 10.66 50.68 6.70 TF09840 Pro-Poor Healthcare Supply Chains in Kenya P074091 50.00 31.73 44.26 0.79 TF09884 Kenya HRBF K&L Grant P074091 125.00 11.01 29.88 4.02 TF09049 CAPACITY BUILDING OF RURAL TRADITIONAL HERBALISTS P074091 1,218.88 167.51 617.87 601.01 TF01126 BNPP-Growth & Equity: Welfare and Services Monitoring via Mobile Phone Surveys P118865 675.00 0.00 0.00 350.00 TF09729 Kenya PER Gender Project P096288 50.00 17.00 50.00 0.00 TF09482 W2-STRENGTHENING GOVERNANCE, TRANSPARENCY, AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN KENYA P117536 350.00 39.01 285.42 1.62 TF09653 Support to the Government of Kenya for Social Protection Programming - Preparation and P121504 145.00 53.88 128.15 3.05 TF09727 CT-OVC Program Enhanced Supervision P111545 100.80 14.53 97.62 3.18 TF09727 CT-OVC Program Program Management P111545 43.08 8.13 8.13 34.95 TF09727 CT-OVC Program Trust Fund Administration P111545 64.61 0.00 0.00 64.61 TF09730 Support to the Government of Kenya for Social Protection Programming P121594 1,150.00 147.27 287.76 806.12 TF09702 Support to the Kenya Youth Empowerment Project P111546 1,000.00 0.00 400.00 600.00 TF09727 Cash Transfer for Orphans and Vulnerable Children P111545 9,424.75 3,180.02 9,381.79 42.96 TF09730 Republic of Kenya: Support to the Kenya Youth Empowerment Project P111546 500.00 95.62 448.02 51.98 TF01095 Kenya Urban Knowledge and Implementation Program P113542 1,401.27 66.96 66.96 877.46 TF07161 Kenya Municipal Project P066488 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,840.15 TF09934 Cities Alliance - Kenya Baseline State of the City Surveys P125526 400.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 TF09874 Kenya - Water Resources Assessment P118665 123.60 1.05 82.69 26.68 TF09916 PPIAF: PPP Options for the Management and Development of Irrigation Infrastructure P125826 113.50 52.97 52.97 10.78 TF09039 TTR - CGAP/GATES TECH PROGRAM EQUITY BANK P102064 1,340.00 340.00 1,000.00 340.00 TF09415 KCP II - KENYA-YOUTH FRIENDLY SVCS ON VOL.COUNSELLING AND TESTING P116605 100.00 8.90 73.21 26.79 TF05757 Kenya Olkaria II Geothermal Expansion Project P103458 6,137.50 0.00 253.43 22.50 TF01072 Kenya Climate Innovation Center P128680 487.90 147.03 147.03 291.36 TF09834 Mobile Apps thru Social Networking in Africa - Kenya P122163 35.00 0.00 20.00 15.00 TF09670 GPOBA (W1): Kenya Energy Expansion P121330 226.00 4.30 42.72 183.28 TF09859 Sharing results from GAP-funded activities on gender and agriculture in Kenya P121024 82.75 62.71 66.39 7.51 TF01092 StAR - Kenya Country Engagement P128633 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 WSP TRUST FUNDS TF01009 GPOBA (W3 SPN): Microfinance for Small Piped Water Schemes - Kenya P104075 37.51 0.00 0.00 37.51 TF01009 GPOBA (W3 SPN): Micro-finance for Small Piped Water Schemes - Kenya P104075 44.77 0.00 0.00 44.77 TF01009 GPOBA (W3 SPN): Micro-finance for Small Piped Water Schemes - Kenya P104075 28.81 0.00 0.00 28.81 TF09579 GPOBA W3 - EU Cont - Kenya Comm. Water Supervision P104075 112.97 0.00 0.00 112.97 TF09782 GPOBA (W1): Kenya OBA Finance Facility P123640 240.10 172.83 207.08 11.12 TF05761 GPOBA KENYA COMMUNITY WATER P104075 383.77 30.83 284.65 99.12 TF05761 GPOBA KENYA COMMUNITY WATER P104075 383.77 77.03 329.85 53.92 TF09339 GPOBA W3 - EU Grant to Kenya Community Water P104075 1,773.64 135.56 135.56 709.84 Total 74,148.30 13,347.65 44,766.10 25,813.96 31 Annex 9: Kenya IFC Portfolio Committed and Disbursed Outstanding Investment Portfolio As of 2/29/2012 (In USD Millions) Committed Disbursed Outstanding **Quasi Partici **Quasi Partici FY Approval Company Loan Equity Equity *GT/RM pant Loan Equity Equity *GT/RM pant 2006 Abe-kenya 6 0.48 0 0 0 0 0.48 0 0 0 0 Boa - kenya 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 2004 Bp kenya 0 5 0 0 0 0 3.58 0 0 0 2010 Braeburn 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Cfc stanbic 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 7/8/1982 Dtb kenya 30 4.45 15 0 0 30 4.45 15 0 0 2010 Ecobank kenya 0 0 12.5 0 0 0 0 12.5 0 0 0 Ips(k)-allpack 0 0.36 0 0 0 0 0.36 0 0 0 0 Ips(k)-frigoken 0 0.06 0 0 0 0 0.06 0 0 0 0 Ips(k)-prem food 0 0.11 0 0 0 0 0.11 0 0 0 1996/99/09 K-rep bank 0 3.65 0 0 0 0 1.4 0 0 0 2011 Kcb 100 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 2006 Kingdom hotel 9 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 2005 Kongoni 0.34 0 0 0 0 0.34 0 0 0 0 2005 Magadi soda co. 0 0 0 0.57 0 0 0 0 0.57 0 0 Premier gas 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007 Rvr 22 0 17.46 0 0 6.59 0 17.46 0 0 2000 Tsavo power 1.37 0.83 0.13 0 2.14 1.37 0.83 0.13 0 2.14 Total Portfolio: 172.71 16.94 63.09 0.57 2.14 149.3 11.27 63.09 0.57 2.14 * Denotes Guarantee and Risk Management Products. ** Quasi Equity includes both loan and equity types. 32 Annex 10: Kenya at a Glance Kenya at a glance 2/25/11 S ub- P O V E R T Y a nd S O C IA L S a ha ra n Lo w- Development diamond* Ke nya A f ric a inc o m e 2009 P o pulatio n, mid-year (millio ns) 39.8 840 846 Life expectancy GNI per capita (A tlas metho d, US$ ) 760 1,126 512 GNI (A tlas metho d, US$ billio ns) 30.3 946 433 A v e ra ge a nnua l gro wt h, 2 0 0 3 - 0 9 P o pulatio n (%) 2.6 2.5 2.2 Labo r fo rce (%) 2.8 2.9 2.6 GNI Gross per primary M o s t re c e nt e s t im a t e ( la t e s t ye a r a v a ila ble , 2 0 0 3 - 0 9 ) capita enrollment P o verty (% o f po pulatio n belo w natio nal po verty line) 47 .. .. Urban po pulatio n (% o f to tal po pulatio n) 22 37 29 Life expectancy at birth (years) 54 52 57 Infant mo rtality (per 1,000 live births) 55 81 76 Child malnutritio n (% o f children under 5) 17 25 28 Access to improved water source A ccess to an impro ved water so urce (% o f po pulatio n) 59 60 64 Literacy (% o f po pulatio n age 1 5+) 87 62 66 Gro ss primary enro llment (% o f scho o l-age po pulatio n) 112 100 104 M ale 113 105 107 Kenya Low-income group Female 110 95 100 KE Y E C O N O M IC R A T IO S a nd LO N G - T E R M T R E N D S 19 8 9 19 9 9 2008 2009 Economic ratios* GDP (US$ billio ns) 8.3 12.9 30.0 29.4 Gro ss capital fo rmatio n/GDP 24.9 15.5 20.3 20.9 Expo rts o f go o ds and services/GDP 23.0 20.8 27.6 25.2 Trade Gro ss do mestic savings/GDP 17.8 9.0 6.1 7.8 Gro ss natio nal savings/GDP 18.0 12.0 13.9 15.4 Current acco unt balance/GDP -6.8 -3.5 -4.4 -5.5 Interest payments/GDP 3.4 1.3 0.4 0.4 Domestic Capital savings formation To tal debt/GDP 71.2 50.2 24.7 27.2 To tal debt service/expo rts 36.9 25.5 5.1 4.4 P resent value o f debt/GDP .. .. .. 19.4 P resent value o f debt/expo rts .. .. .. 65.4 Indebtedness 19 8 9 - 9 9 19 9 9 - 0 9 2008 2009 2 0 0 9 - 13 (average annual gro wth) GDP 2.2 4.1 1.6 2.6 4.9 GDP per capita -0.9 1.4 -1.1 -0.1 .. Kenya Low-income group Expo rts o f go o ds and services 2.3 6.3 7.5 -7.0 5.9 S T R UC T UR E o f t he E C O N O M Y 19 8 9 19 9 9 2008 2009 Growth of capital and GDP (%) (% o f GDP ) 25 A griculture 30.2 32.4 21 .0 22.6 20 Industry 19.0 16.8 15.1 15.3 15 M anufacturing 11.7 11.4 8.9 8.7 10 Services 50.8 50.8 63.9 62.1 5 0 Ho useho ld final co nsumptio n expenditure 64.2 75.3 77.2 75.9 04 05 06 07 08 09 General go v't final co nsumptio n expenditure 18.1 15.8 16.7 16.3 GCF GDP Impo rts o f go o ds and services 30.1 27.4 41.8 38.3 19 8 9 - 9 9 19 9 9 - 0 9 2008 2009 Growth of exports and imports (%) (average annual gro wth) A griculture 1.5 2.3 -4.3 -2.4 20 15 Industry 1.6 4.5 4.6 3.6 10 M anufacturing 1.9 3.9 3.5 2.0 5 Services 3.4 4.1 2.7 4.2 0 -5 04 05 06 07 08 09 Ho useho ld final co nsumptio n expenditure 3.4 4.3 -0.7 3.7 -10 General go v't final co nsumptio n expenditure 8.1 2.1 2.3 5.5 Gro ss capital fo rmatio n 4.2 8.4 11.1 3.8 Exports Imports Impo rts o f go o ds and services 9.6 7.7 6.6 -0.2 No te: 2009 data are preliminary estimates. This table was pro duced fro m the Develo pment Eco no mics LDB database. * The diamo nds sho w fo ur key indicato rs in the co untry (in bo ld) co mpared with its inco me-gro up average. If data are missing, the diamo nd will be inco mplete. 33 Kenya P R IC E S a nd G O V E R N M E N T F IN A N C E 19 8 9 19 9 9 2008 2009 Inflation (%) D o m e s t ic pric e s 30 (% change) 25 Co nsumer prices 13.8 5.7 25.1 10.9 20 Implicit GDP deflato r 9.8 4.2 11.9 6.7 15 10 G o v e rnm e nt f ina nc e 5 (% o f GDP , includes current grants) 0 Current revenue 25.6 21.7 22.8 23.9 04 05 06 07 08 09 Current budget balance 2.5 3.9 -0.4 1.0 GDP deflator CPI Overall surplus/deficit -3.6 13.4 -5.0 -8.4 TRADE 19 8 9 19 9 9 2008 2009 Export and import levels (US$ mill.) (US$ millio ns) To tal expo rts (fo b) 913 1,755 5,040 4,502 15,000 P etro leum 42 138 117 95 Co ffee 153 172 155 202 10,000 M anufactures 194 420 625 526 To tal impo rts (cif) 1,780 2,895 11,497 10,297 Fo o d 51 156 61 7 567 5,000 Fuel and energy 343 527 2,987 2,006 Capital go o ds 593 680 3,063 3,065 0 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 Expo rt price index (2000=100) 25 93 166 178 Impo rt price index (2000=100) 27 90 1 81 182 Exports Imports Terms o f trade (2000=1 00) 94 103 92 98 B A LA N C E o f P A Y M E N T S 19 8 9 19 9 9 2008 2009 Current account balance to GDP (%) (US$ millio ns) Expo rts o f go o ds and services 1,905 2,687 8,291 7,413 4 Impo rts o f go o ds and services 2,492 3,528 12,563 11,253 2 Reso urce balance -586 -842 -4,272 -3,840 0 Net inco me -244 -173 -46 -65 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 Net current transfers 267 564 2,995 2,297 -2 Current acco unt balance -563 -450 -1,323 -1,608 -4 Financing items (net) 623 518 844 2,072 -6 Changes in net reserves -60 -68 479 -464 M emo : Reserves including go ld (US$ millio ns) 341 791 2,928 3,127 Co nversio n rate (DEC, lo cal/US$ ) 20.6 70.3 69.2 77.4 E X T E R N A L D E B T a nd R E S O UR C E F LO WS 19 8 9 19 9 9 2008 2009 Composition of 2009 debt (US$ mill.) (US$ millio ns) To tal debt o utstanding and disbursed 5,889 6,475 7,427 8,005 IB RD 889 91 0 0 IDA 893 2,220 3,050 3,156 G: 1,011 To tal debt service 709 693 408 382 F: 352 IB RD 150 70 0 0 B: 3,156 IDA 8 39 99 104 Co mpo sitio n o f net reso urce flo ws Official grants 379 196 1,099 1,270 Official credito rs 385 -126 48 203 E: 2,330 P rivate credito rs 161 -68 -8 24 Fo reign direct investment (net inflo ws) 62 52 96 141 P o rtfo lio equity (net inflo ws) 0 2 5 3 C: 451 D: 705 Wo rld B ank pro gram Co mmitments 392 0 150 525 Disbursements 244 78 178 164 A - IBRD E - Bilateral P rincipal repayments 79 82 75 81 B - IDA D - Other multilateral F - Private C - IMF G - Short-term Net flo ws 165 -3 104 83 Interest payments 79 28 24 22 Net transfers 86 -31 79 61 No te: This table was pro duced fro m the Develo pment Eco no mics LDB database. 2/25/11 34 IBRD 33426R2 K E N YA CITIES AND TOWNS MAIN ROADS DISTRICT CAPITALS* RAILROADS NATIONAL CAPITAL DISTRICT BOUNDARIES RIVERS INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARIES *not all District Capitals are shown. 34°E 36°E 38°E 40°E 42°E SOUTH SUDAN To Murle ETHIOPIA To Karungu Juba Lotikipi Plain Lokichokio Chalbi To 4°N 4°N Desert To Ramu Mandera Imi Kakuma Dila lls Lake Hi Sololo Tu r k a n a North Horr Moyale Mandera sa Turkana is Lodwar an D Marsabit el Turkw Buna El Wak UGANDA Lokichar South Horr Marsabit Tarbaj . tns 2°N Kangatet M Wajir 2°N to West Pokot do Lo g N aB Wajir Che Samburu og al ran Lak Bor ga Isiolo SO M A L I A Milgis Hil ny ls ’iro To Trans Nzoia Elgeyo/ Maralal Ng Bilesha Plain Mbale Kitale Kapedo Marakwet Ewaso Mando Baringo Archer’s Gashi Bungoma Uasin Post Garba To Gishu Tula Kampala Busia Marigat Eldoret Kakamega Isiolo Mbalambala Kakamega Laikipia D e ra To Nandi Nyahururu Meru Lak Kismaayo Butere Nanyuki Vihiga Falls 0° Siaya Mt. Kenya 0° Kisumu Kisumu Nyandarua (5,199 m) Tana Kericho Tharaka-Nithi Nakuru Nyeri Kirinyaga Homa Bay Kericho Nakuru Garissa Garissa Nyeri Embu Nyamira Gilgil Karungu Embu Nguni Bomet Murang'a Lake Migori Kisii ra Thika Ma Kiambu Bura Victoria To Narok Narok Kolbio To Bur Gavo Musoma Lolgorien Ma NAIROBI Ngang u E Nairobi Machakos Kitui Kitui erab sc arp Tana River eli Machakos Thua Plain me nt Konza Magadi Makueni Bodhei 2°S Kajiado Ya t t Ikutha Lamu 2°S To a A th i Seronera Pla tea Garsen Kibwezi u Lamu Namanga To Arusha Tsavo Kilifi Galana Tsavo To Moshi Voi Malindi INDIA N KENYA TANZANIA Taita/Taveta Mackinnon Park OCEA N This map was produced by Mombasa the Map Design Unit of The 4°S Kwale Mombasa World Bank. The boundaries, Kwale colors, denominations and 0 40 80 120 160 200 Kilometers any other information shown on this map do not imply, on the part of The World Bank Shimoni Group, any judgment on the 0 40 80 120 Miles To Dar Es Salaam legal status of any territory, or any endorsement or acceptance of such 34°E 36°E 38°E 40°E boundaries. JULY 2011