RP1558 V3 REV PAKISTAN WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DASU HYDROPOWER PROJECT SOCIAL AND RESETTLEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN Volume 11: DOWNSTREAM FISHING COMMUNITIES: BASELINE AND IMPACTS ASSESSMENT General Manager (Hydro) Planning WAPDA Sunny view, Lahore, Pakistan Final Version 08 March 2014 Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments i Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments SOCIAL AND RESETTLEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN INDEX OF VOLUMES Vol. 1 Executive Summary Vol. 2 Socioeconomic Baseline and Impact Assessments Vol. 3 Public Consultation and Participation Plan Vol. 4 Resettlement Framework Vol. 5 Resettlement Action Plan Vol. 6 Gender Action Plan Vol. 7 Public Health Action Plan Vol. 8 Management Plan for Construction-related Impacts Vol. 9 Grievances Redress Plan Vol. 10 Communications Strategy Vol. 11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments Vol. 12 Area Development and Community Support Programs Vol. 13 Costs and Budgetary Plan Vol. 14 Safeguards Implementation and Monitoring Plan. ii Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments ABBREVIATIONS ADB Asian Development Bank Asl Above Sea Level DD Deputy Director DG Director General DHP Dasu Hydropower Project DO District Officer DPA Dasu Project Area EIA Environment Impact Assessment EMAP Environment Management Action Plan EPA Environment Protection Agency FGDs Focus Group Discussions GRC Grievance Redressal Committee IDIs In-depth Interviews IEE Initial Environmental Examination IFC International Finance Corporation IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature KKH Karakoram Highway Km Kilometer KP Khyber Pakhtunkhwa KPK Khyber Pakhtunkhwa LAC Land Acquisition Collector M Meter MW Mega Watt NCS National Conservation Strategy NCS National Conservation Strategy NGOs Non Governmental Organizations NTDC Natinal Transmission and Despatch Company OP Operational Policy PAP Project Affected Person PAV Project Affected Village PD Project Director PEPA Pakistan Environmental Protection Act PEPO Pakistan Environmental Protection Ordinance PKR Pakistan Rupees PMU Project Management Unit PRO Project Resettlement Office RCC Roller compacted Concrete SAP Social Action Plan SEAP Socio-Economic Assessment Profile SFA Social Framework Agreement SMP Social Management Plan TMA Tehsil Municipal Administration TOR Terms of Reference ToRs Terms of Referance WAPDA Water and Power Development Authority WB World Bank Xen Executive Engineer Units of Measurements GWh Giga watt hour (Unit of Energy) Kg Kilogram (Unit of mass – 1000 gm) MW Mega Watt ( Unit of Power) iii Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments GLOSSARY OF TERMS Affected Persons Any person or household adversely affected by any project related change or changes in use of land, water or other natural resources, or the person/s who loses his/her/their asset or property movable or fixed, in full or in part including land, with or without displacement, after the commencement and during execution of a project. Compensation includes cash payment, deferred payment, a bond, an insurance policy, stipend, payment in kind, rendition of services, grant of privileges and disturbance money entitlement to special treatment by Government and Semi Government, grant of alternative land, grant of import licenses and business, trade and commercial facilities in addition to the rehabilitation and resettlement of an affected person. Commercial Fishing Commercial fishing refers to the harvesting of fish, either in whole or in part, for sale, barter or trade Consultation Consultation refers to two-way transfer of information or joint discussion between project staff and the affected population. Systematic consultation implies a sharing of ideas. Bank experience shows that consultation often yields the best resettlement alternatives, fruitful procedures for continued participation, and independent information on actual conditions or implementation Entitlement Means the sum total of compensation and other assistance assessed according to the status of each individual belonging to the project area or related therewith and dependent thereon, by the designated Evaluation Committee or any other such body Fisheries The occupation, industry, or season of taking fish or other sea animals (as sponges, shrimp, or seals) Household People residing under one roof, using the same hearth and operating as a single economic unit Income Restoration Re-establishing income sources and livelihood of the affected persons according to their status as determined under the law Land Acquisition Means, the process whereby a person is compelled by a public agency to alienate all or part of the land a person owns or possesses, to the ownership and possession of that agency, for public purpose in return for compensation Primary Data PRIMARY DATA is data that has not been previously published, i.e. the data is derived from a new or orgiinal research study and collected at the source, e.g., in marketing, it is information that is obtained directly from first-hand sources by means of surveys, observation or experimentation. Random Sampling A sample in which every element in the population has an equal chance of being selected Resettlement Means all measures taken to mitigate any and all adverse impacts, resulting due to execution of a Project on the livelihood of the project affected persons, their property, and includes compensation, relocation and rehabilitation Run-of-River ROR is a type of hydroelectric generation whereby little or no water storage is provided. Run-of-the-river power plants may either have no storage at all, or a limited amount of storage, in which case the storage reservoir is referred to as pondage. A plant without pondage has no storage and is, therefore, subject to seasonal river flows and serves as a peak power plant while a plant with pondage can regulate water flow and serve either as a peaking or base load v Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments power plant. Secondary Data It refers to the statistical material which is not originated by the investigator himself but obtained from someone else's records, or when Primary data is utilized for any other purpose at some subsequent enquiry it is termed as Secondary data. This type of data is generally taken from newspapers, magazines, bulletins, reports, journals etc. e.g. if the data published by RBI on currency, National Income, Exports or Imports, is used in some other statistical enquiry, it will be termed as Secondary data. According to M.M. Blair, "Secondary data are those already in existence for some other purpose than the answering of the question in hand." Stakeholders Include, affected persons and communities, proponents, private and public businesses, NGOs, host communities and EPA, etc. vi Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments DOWNSTREAM FISHING COMMUNITIES: BASELINE AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... XI 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................. 1-2 1.4 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY ..................................................................... 1-2 2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK .................................................................. 2-1 2.1 THE PAKISTAN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT, 1997 ................... 2-1 2.2 THE PAKISTAN NATIONAL CONSERVATION STRATEGY (NCS) ............. 2-1 2.3 KP FISHERIES RULES 1976 ........................................................................ 2-1 2.4 WB OP 4.12, INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT .......................................... 2-2 3 INDUS RIVER: AQUATIC CHARACTERISTICS ....................................... 3-1 3.1 AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS ............................................................................. 3-1 3.2 FISH DIVERSITY ........................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 SNOW CARPS HABITAT, MIGRATION AND SPWANING ........................... 3-3 3.4 MAHASEER .................................................................................................. 3-3 4 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................ 4-1 4.1 TASKS ........................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 STUDY AREA................................................................................................ 4-2 4.3 SAMPLING TECHNIQUE .............................................................................. 4-2 4.4 PRIMARY DATA COLLECTION.................................................................... 4-3 4.4.1 Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) ........................................................... 4-3 4.4.2 In-depth Interviews (IDIs) ........................................................................ 4-3 4.4.3 Sample Survey through Questionnaire Filling .......................................... 4-3 4.5 SECONDARY DATA COLLECTION ............................................................. 4-3 4.6 LIMITATIONS IN THE STUDY....................................................................... 4-3 5 SOCIO-ECONOMIC BASELINE CONDITIONS ......................................... 5-1 5.1 DISTRICTS POFILES .................................................................................... 5-1 5.1.1 Kohistan .................................................................................................. 5-1 5.1.2 Shangla................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1.3 Battagram ............................................................................................... 5-1 5.1.4 Torgher ................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 HOUSEHOLDS INVOLVED IN FISHING IN SAMPLE VILLAGES ................ 5-1 5.3 FISHING GEAR ............................................................................................. 5-2 5.4 AVERAGE FISH CATCH ............................................................................... 5-2 5.5 END USE OF FISH CATCH ........................................................................... 5-3 5.6 FISH CATCH LOCATIONS ........................................................................... 5-4 5.7 AVERAGE INCOME FROM FISHING ........................................................... 5-4 vii Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments 5.8 LITERACY LEVEL OF FISHERMEN ............................................................. 5-5 5.9 AGE AND MARITAL STATUS OF FISHERMEN ........................................... 5-5 6 CONSULTATIONS AND DISCUSSION ..................................................... 6-1 6.1 CONSULTATIONS CONDUCTED DURING STUDY ..................................... 6-1 6.2 CONSULTATIONS – DASU DAM CONSTRUCTION AND DOWNSTREAM IMPACTS ............................................................................ 6-2 6.3 FEEDBACK FROM CONSULTATIONS ........................................................ 6-3 6.3.1 Overall Information and Attitude towards the Project ............................... 6-3 6.3.2 Key Concerns of Downstream Communities ........................................... 6-3 6.4 FEEDBACK FROM IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS WITH DEPARTMENTAL OFFICIALS .................................................................................................... 6-3 6.5 INCORPORATION OF FEEDBACK AND CONCERNS ................................ 6-4 7 IMPACTS .................................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 IMPACT ON FISH AND FISH HABITAT DURING CONSTRUCTION ........... 7-1 7.2 IMPACT ON FISH MIGRATION ..................................................................... 7-1 7.3 IMPACT ON UPSTREAM FISH HABITAT..................................................... 7-2 7.4 IMPACT ON THE DOWNSTREAM UP TO TAILRACE OUTLET .................. 7-2 7.5 IMPACT ON DOWNSTREAM WATER QUALITY ........................................ 7-2 7.6 CHANGE IN DOWNSTREAM SEDIMENT..................................................... 7-3 7.7 IMPACTS ON THE FISH CATCHES AND LIVELIHOOD OF FISHERMEN .................................................................................................. 7-3 7.8 IMPACTS ON OTHER STAKEHOLDERS ..................................................... 7-3 8 BUDGET ..................................................................................................... 8-1 8.1 ESTABLISHMENT OF HATCHERY .............................................................. 8-1 8.2 EDUCATION AND OUTREACH PROGRAMS .............................................. 8-2 8.3 IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING ...................................................... 8-2 9 REFERENCES ............................................................................................ 9-1 viii Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1: First Schedule (Section 8) Species of Fish and Prohibitions ........................ 2-2 Table 3.1: Fish Species of Northern Pakistan ............................................................... 3-2 Table 4.1: District wise Study Area ............................................................................... 4-2 Table 5.1: District-wise Villages &Households involved in Fishing ................................ 5-2 Table 5.2: Districtwise Use of Fishing Gear by the Fishermen ...................................... 5-2 Table 5.3: Districtwise Fish Catch by surveyedFishermen ............................................ 5-3 Table 5.4: Annual Fishermen’ Income in Different Downstream Districts ...................... 5-5 Table 5.5: District wise Surveyed LiteracyLevel of Fishermen ...................................... 5-5 Table 5.6: District wise Age and Marital Status of Surveyed Fishermen ....................... 5-6 Table 6.1: Consultations Undertaken during Study on Downstream Impacts ................ 6-1 Table 6.2: List of Key Issues Discussed ..................................................................... 6-2 Table 8.1: Cost for Development of Fish Hatchery ....................................................... 8-1 Table 8.2: Cost for Education and Outreach Programs ................................................ 8-2 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1: DHP Location Map .................................................................................. 1-2 Figure 4.1: Dasu Dam Reservoir and Downstream Area ........................................... 4-1 Figure 4.2: Study Area showing Downstream Settlements ........................................ 4-2 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A: Sample Questionnaires Appendix B: Data Collected during Field Survey (16 – 30 May, 2013) Appendix C: List of Consulted Fishermen Appendix D: List of Key Informants Appendix E: Photo-log of the Downstream fishing communities, Baseline ix Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The Dasu Hydropower Project (DHP) is among the list of projects to be implemented on priority as per the Vision 2025 program prepared by Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA). The proposed DHP is estimated to generate 18,440 GWh of energy per annum which when injected into the transmission and distribution system would curtail shortage of electricity in the country. This project would be operated on run of river daily cycle basis. DHP is not expected to affect adversely in any context on the water sharing between the provinces as per 1991 Water Accord among all four provinces of Pakistan. WAPDA is the Executing Agency of the project while the World Bank is the main financer of Dasu Hydropower Project. The dam site of the Dasu Hydropower Project (DHP) is located at about 8 km north of Dasu town, the administrative headquarters of District Kohistan at geographic location N 35o 19’ 6.61”, E 73o 11’ 41.33” on Indus River in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) province of Pakistan.DHP willbuild a 242 m high concrete gravity dam and 74 km long reservoir behind the dam with an average width of 365m. The project will have an underground powerhouse having 12 turbines, each of which will produce 360 MW power, and a final maximum capacity to produce 4320 MW. A 46 km of KKH will be submerged in DHP reservoir and hence will be relocated to a higher level above the reservoir. It is a phased project and will be completed during 2014-2035. AQUATIC CHARACTERISTICS OF INDUS RIVER .Indus and its tributaries are characterized by relatively steep gradients and substrate sizes, fast-flowing, turbulent and turbid water. Physico-chemical conditions of river water changes between the summer and winter seasons. During summer, river water is very turbid and carries a high sediment load. Snow carp species are the dominant fish species in the project area representing more than 90 percent of total fish catch. Snow carps mainly inhabit the tributaries and the confluences of Indus. These are short distant migrants and migrate within the tributaries. The triggers for migrations are high flows, high sediment load and low temperatures. During spring, when flows started increasing in the rivers due to melting of snow, the fish migrate upstream to the head waters from April and May (within tributaries) due to high flows and turbidity at lower elevations. During autumn, when the temperatures are starts to drop at higher elevations in head waters, the fish migrate downstream from September and October. The fish spawns in tributaries, during March and April and again during September and October. LEGAL FRAMEWORK The Pakistan Environmental Protection Act (PEPA), 1997 is the basic legislative tool empowering the government to frame regulations for the protection of the environment. The Act is applicable to a broad range of issues like (a) the ecosystem and ecological relationships; and (b) all social and economic conditions affecting community life. The Pakistan National Conservation Strategy (NCS) is the principal policy document for environmental issues in the country and was developed and approved by the Government of Pakistan on March 1, 1992. The NCS works on a ten-year planning and implementation cycle. The NCS deals with protecting water bodies and sustaining fisheries. According to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Fisheries Rule 1976, power granted to Director General (DG) Fisheries to issue permits to catch fish. The ordinance provides protection against 1) Destruction of fish by explosives, and 2) Destruction of fish by poisoning water. There are other clauses giving protection to fish. Penalties are provided for violating the provisions of the ordinance. xi Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY This study evaluates potentiality of socio-economic impacts on fishing communities downstream of Dasu Dam Axis. The main focus of this study is to determine the impacts of Dasu Hydropower Project (DHP) on downstream fishing community and other direct and indirect stakeholders of fishery downstream of the Dasu Dam Axis to Tarbela Reservoir reach. The objectives of the study are to: (i) establish baseline conditions of communities engaged in fishing downstream of Dasu Dam; (ii) assess the present income level of the fishing communities downstream of the dam; (iii) identify and assess the overall socio-economic impacts on downstream fishing communities during and after project construction; and (iv) suggest mitigation measures for the adverse impacts of the Projectkeeping in view the sustainable livelihood of the downstream fishermen communities’ uptoTarbela reservoir reach on left and right banks of the river Indus. METHODOLOGY The study area for downstream fishing communities starts from downstream of Dasu Dam Axis and ends at Tarbela reservoir reach. Four concerning districtsareas were covered in this study. The length of the study area along the river Indus is approximately 200 km. For the survey, village representatives or identifying persons were initially interviewed to proceed further in that village. These representatives/identifying persons further indicated fishermen in their respective villages. Five fishermen from each village were selected to be interviewed. Extensive consultation and discussion was also done with the concerned community in each village to get maximum information in relevance to the study. Primary data was collected in this activity through prescribed questionnaires. A set of threekinds of questionnaires, i) for interviews with Identifying Persons/Key Informants; ii) for village community focus group discussion; and iii) for interviews with individual fisherman were used. The secondary data was collected from published material and locally posted government officials such as the Assistant Director Fisheries, Pattan (Kohistan District), Assistant Director Fisheries, Shangla District, Assistant Director Fisheries, Battagram District, Assistant Director Fisheries, Mansera District and Depty Director Fisheries, Khalabat/Tarbela. BASELINE CONDITIONS A total of 110fishermen from 22 villages were interviewed for this study. The baseline survey results revealed that: (i) Out of 5,294 total households of 22 sampled villages (10 on right bank and 12 on left bank), 626 (11.8 %) were involved in fishing. District Kohistan and Shanglahave surveyed villages on both banks (Left & Right) of the Indus river while; the Battgram and Torgher districts existon left bank of the Indus River. In District Kohistan, fishermen HHs living on left bank (16.9%) are higher in number than right bank (8%) of the river. (ii) The common fishing gear used in the study area is gill net (83%) to catch the fish from the river. The fishermen also use hook &line (73%) and cast net (20%). The fishermen use cast net to catch fish from tributaries only. In District Torgher, only two fishermen told that they sometimes use poison (agriculture pesticide) for catching fish from the river or nullah. (iii) The overall average catch is 4.12 kg/day. On an average, the fishermen practice fishing about 18 days in a month. The trend of fish catchingsignificantly decreases from Kohistan to Torgher district areas. The xii Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments highest fish catch (5.04 kg/day) recorded in district Kohistan while lowest (2.02 kg/day) in district Torgher. (iv) 83 fishermen (75% of the sample survey) catch fish for domestic use only while, 27 fishermen (25%) catch fish for domestic use but also sell a part of it. (v) The overall total 110 fishermen’s average household income is around Rs. 137,629/year. While, the total average income of 27 fishermen who sell a part of their fish catch is Rs. 146,667/year with average income from fishing is Rs. 58,641/year (40%). The highest average HH income from fishing in District Kohistan is Rs. 73,621/year i.e. 49% of total income.The highest income from fish catch is in Pattan which is Rs. 142,650/year (86%). (vi) The age of surveyed fishermen ranged between 18 to 72 years. (vii) Out of total of 110 surveyed fishermen, 98(89%) are married while remaining 12(11%) fishermen were single. (viii) The 53 (47%) out of 110 total fishermen were literate, 19 fishermen were educated up to primary level. Out of all the interviewed, only one fisherman has an education up to masters level. PUBLIC AND OFFICIAL CONSULTATION The study is based on thorough consultation and participation in all the downstream target areas. In all villages, focus group discussions and individual discussions with the key informants were made. In total, 22 focus group discussions were made and, 229 community fishing persons participated in the FGDs. In parallel, 4 surveyed Districts Fisheries Officials were also interviewed on the fishing in their district areas including on Rules Regulations applying to fishing from the river as well as penalties, if imposed ever. Likewise, fish vendors on all the spots which are significantly low in number were interviewed. These consultations in addition to interviews and survey questionnaires filling strengthened the in-depth picture of the overall perceptions of the downstream community and; information required for developing safeguard volume on dam/reservoir construction and its impacts on downstream fishing communities. PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Impacts of DHP Downstream impact of DHP is limited to first 4.4 km, between damsite and tailrace, due to reduced flows during low flow season. A flow of 20 cumecs will be released as environmental flow in this section. Below tailrace, the instantaneous inflow to the dam will be equal to the instantaneous outflow from the dam. Hence any impacts further to the downstream of tailrace are not expected. Generally hydropower projects will impact the downstream fish and thereby fisheries due to changes in water flow, water quality and blockage of fish migration. But these types of impacts are very limited for DHP due to the following reasons  DHP is a run-of-river Project with a continuous flow of water to the downstream, and hence it will not alter any downstream flow  Due to limited storage area of the reservoir (2,85 ha) and high water inflows (up to 7,000 cumecs), the water retention time in the reservoir is very low and hence impacts associated with altered water quality (dissolved oxygen and temperature) will not occur in downstream of DHP  Very fine sediments will continue to pass through dam site. Further sedimentation will be brought to Indus through tributaries located on the downstream of the dam.  There is no migratory fish on the Indus in the dam site. The snow carp (or snow trout), the main fish species of the project area breeds, spawns and migrates within the tributaries – not in the main Indus. However, during construction the quality in Indus would be affected due to large scale construction activities in the river, which could further affect the fish habitat and fish. xiii Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments These impacts will be mitigated by the implementation of project’s environmental management plans. Mitigation and Enhancement Measures The impact of DHP on downstream fish is minimal. However, the following mitigations measures are proposed as part of the overall project environmental managemtn plans will mitigate any potential impacts on the downstream fisheries Proposed mitigation measures are given below:  Development of a fish hatchery with native snow caprs and stocking the fingerlings in the tributaries of the downstream, upstream and reservoir  Continuous monitoring program to assess the impact on the fish  Raising awarenessamong the local population to avoid fishing in spawning season (March/April and September/October) In addition, the Project will take up follwoing enhancement measure to support the fishing communities  education and outreach to address informationneeds related to fisheries in the downstream areaincluding some training programme for skill enhancement of the fishing community For the above said main activities, the required funds for implementation of the fishery development in response to DHP development in downstream areas will be spent in collaboration with the Provincial Fisheries Department in the concerned Districts areas along the river. The total budget for the implementation of the proposed development measures is USD 5.12 million. MONITORING AND EVALUATION Socio-economic and environmental impacts mitigation measures by the project will be monitored regularly during the DHP implementation and operation. The evaluation will be made by using the findings and results of the mitigation measures adopted by the project. xiv Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND The power availability situation in Pakistan is extremely critical with the periods of load- shedding that is causing adverse economic and social impacts across the country. To meet the short-fall, generation from burning of fossil fuel is being expanded, which is environmentally damaging due to the emissions produced and is also unsustainable. Added to this is the fact that much of the fuel has to be imported. The River Indus provides perennial flow and a large number of potential sites for hydropower development in the northern Pakistan. Dasu is one of such sites where a detailed feasibility study has been completed in early 2009. Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) undertook the study through a consortium of indigenous and expatriate consultants. Construction of about 242m high dam at this site will provide a gross head of over 200 m for power generation with an installed capacity of 4320 MW. The Dasu Hydropower Project (DHP) is among the list of projects to be implemented on priority as per the vision 2025 program prepared by Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA). The proposed DHP is estimated to generate 18,440 GWh of energy per annum which when injected into the transmission and distribution system would curtail shortage of electricity in the country. The Project will not require permanent water diversion from the main river body. Water diverted through power tunnels would be re- diverted to the river through tail race tunnels, and, therefore, no consumptive use of water is anticipated. DHP is not expected to affect adversely, in any context, the water sharing between the provinces as per 1991 Water Accord between all four provinces of Pakistan. WAPDA is the Executing Agency of the project while the World Bank is the main donor. The main purpose of the DHP is to assist in resolving the shortage of power supply and load shedding crisis in the country. This project would be operated on run of river daily cycle basis with little storage. The project will be completed in four phases with a final power generation capacity of 4320 MW. 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION The dam site of the Dasu Hydropower Project (DHP) is located about 8 km north of Dasu town, the administrative headquarters of District Kohistanon Indus River in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) province of Pakistan. The dam is also located about 74 km downstream of proposed Basha Hydropower Project site. Location of the Project site in Pakistan is shown in Figure 1.1. 1-1 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments Figure 1.1: DHP Location Map The dam site is located about 350 km north of Islamabad and can be reached by road only in about 10 hours through G.T Road up to Hassan Abdal and then through Karakoram Highway (KKH). 1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION As a run-of-the river Project, the Dasu Hydropower Project reservoir extension will reach maximally 74 km upstream of the dam flooding an area of 23.85 sq. km at a maximum flood level of 957 m above mean sea level (amsl).The average discharge at the dam site will be 2,068 cubic meters per second (cumecs). Another important component of the project is the transmission line from Dasu to Rawat with a total length of almost 300 km. Design of the transmission line is under preparation by NTDC which includes Social and Environment Safeguards. WAPDA willbuild a242 m high concrete gravity dam and 74 km long reservoir behind the dam with an average width of 365m. The project will have an underground powerhouse having 12 turbines, each of which will produce 360 MW power, and a final maximum capacity to produce 4,320 MW. 46 km of KKH will be submerged in DHP reservoir and hence will be relocated to a higher level above the reservoir. It is a phased project and its completion period is 2014 to 2035. 1.4 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY This study evaluates potentiality of socio-economic impacts on fishing communities downstream of Dasu Dam Axis. The main focus of this study is to determine the impacts of Dasu Hydropower Project (DHP) on downstream fishing community and other direct and indirect stakeholders of fishery downstream of the Dasu Dam Axis to Tarbela Reservoir reach. The objectives of the study are to: (i) establish baseline conditions of communities engaged in fishing downstream of Dasu Dam; 1-2 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments (ii) assess the present income level of the fishing communities downstream of the dam; (iii) identify and assess the overall adverse socio-economic impacts on downstream fishing communities during and after project construction; and (iv) suggest mitigation measures for the potential adverse impacts of the Project keeping in view the sustainable livelihood of the downstream fishermen communities’uptoTarbela reservoir reach on both left and right banks of the river Indus. 1-3 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments 2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK In Pakistan, different Rules and Regulations govern the operational systems of certain public sector departments and development projects. The development of Dasu Hydropower Project concerns to a number of certain public sector departments which owe their own rules and regulations to operate and implement such developments, efficiently and smoothly. This chapter explains the relevant regulatory framework covering the proposed Dasu Hydropower Project development. 2.1 THE PAKISTAN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT, 1997 The Pakistan Environmental Protection Act, 1997 is the basic legislative tool empowering the government to frame regulations for the protection of the environment. This Act is applicable to a broad range of issues and extends to air, water, industrial liquid effluent, soil, marine, and noise pollution, as well as to the handling of hazardous wastes. In context of the Act "environment" means- “(a) air, water and land; (b) all layers of the atmosphere; (c) all organic and inorganic matter and living organisms; (d) the ecosystem and ecological relationships; (e) buildings, structures, roads, facilities and works; (f) all social and economic conditions affecting community life; and (g) the inter-relationships between any of the factors in sub-clauses (a) to (f). The following key features of the Act have a direct bearing on the proposed project:  Section 12-I (IEE and EIA); requires that “No proponent of a project shall commence construction or operation unless he has filed with the Federal Agency an IEE or, where the project is likely to cause an adverse environmental effect, an EIA, and has obtained from the Federal Agency approval in respect thereof.”  Section 12-2b (Review of IEE and EIA): The Federal Agency shall review the EIA report and accord its approval subject to such conditions as it may deem fit to impose, or require that the EIA be re-submitted after such modifications as may be stipulated or rejected, the project as being contrary to environmental objectives. 2.2 THE PAKISTAN NATIONAL CONSERVATION STRATEGY (NCS) The Pakistan National Conservation Strategy (NCS) is the principal policy document for environmental issues in the country and was developed and approved by the Government of Pakistan on March 1, 1992. The NCS works on a ten-year planning and implementation cycle. The NCS deals with 14 core areas which are;  maintaining soils in cropland;  increasing irrigation efficiency;  protecting watersheds;  supporting forestry and plantations;  restoring rangelands and improving livestock;  protecting water bodies and sustaining fisheries;  conserving biodiversity;  increasing energy efficiency;  developing and deploying material for renewable energy;  preventing/abating pollution;  managing urban wastes;  supporting institutions for common resources;  integrating population and environmental programs; and  Preserving the cultural heritage. 2.3 KP FISHERIES RULES 1976 An ordinance to amend the West Pakistan Fisheries Ordinance 1961 was issued by the Provincial Government of KP in 1976. The objective of the ordinance is to amend and 2-1 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments consolidate the law relating to fisheries in the province of KP. This ordinance is now enforced as Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Fisheries Rule 1976. This grants power to Director General (DG) Fisheries to issue permits to catch fish. The ordinance provides protection against 1) Destruction of fish by explosives, and 2) Destruction of fish by poisoning water. There are other clauses giving protection to fish. Penalties are provided for violating the provisions of the ordinance. Fishing is controlled as shown in Table 2.1: Table 2.1: First Schedule (Section 8) Species of Fish and Prohibitions Fish Species Size Sr.No. Closed Fishing Season Local Name Scientific Name (In Inches) 1. Trout Salmotrutta 9 10th October to 9th March. 2. Mahaseer Tor putitora 12 1st June to 31st August. 3. Rahu Labeorohita 12 Ist June to 31st August. 4. Mori Cirrhinus mrigala 12 Ist June to 31st August. 5. Thaila Catla catla 12 Ist June to 13th August. st st 6. Kalban Labeo calbasu 12 1 June to 31 August. 2.4 WB OP 4.12, INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT This policy covers direct social and economic impacts that are caused by the involuntary taking of land which would result in:  Relocation or loss of shelter;  Loss of assets or access to assets; or  Loss of income sources or means of livelihood, whether or not the affected persons must move to another location; or  The involuntary restriction of access to legally designated parks and protected areas resulting in adverse impacts on the livelihoods of the displaced persons. Where necessary to achieve the objectives of the policy, the resettlement plan or resettlement policy framework to be prepared should also include measures to ensure that displaced persons are:  Offered support after displacement, for a transition period, based on a reasonable estimate of the time likely to be needed to restore their livelihood and standards of living; and  Provided with development assistance in addition to compensation measures such as land preparation, credit facilities, training, or job opportunities. 2-2 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments 3 INDUS RIVER: AQUATIC CHARACTERISTICS 3.1 AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS The Indus originates in Mansorawar Lake in Tibet, is approximately 3,058 km long and drains an area of 963,480 km² before discharging into the Arabian Sea. Physical geological, meteorological and hydro-biological conditions vary substantially along the river as do corresponding important human uses of the river and dependent economic conditions. The uppermost section of the river flows east-west in the mountain peak zone for about 950 km before it reaches the Dasu Project area. The catchment in that area is mountainous and characterized by towering peaks covered with snow and glaciers. The river is mainly fed by melting of mountain snow; flow is high during summer and contribution from rainfall is very small. The mean annual flow and annual runoff at Dasu amounts to 2,100 m³/s and 68 BCM respectively, but differences between summer and winter are large: 80 percent of the water flows between June and October. Physico-chemical conditions of river water changes between the summer and winter seasons. During summer, river water is very turbid and carries a high sediment load. Annual sediment inflow at DHP damsite is about 200 million tons and 97% of it occurs during high flow season of June to October. During the 2012 April surveys the ranges of physico-chemical parameters were: water temperature 15-24°C; conductivity 63-149 µS/cm; calcium carbonate hardness 30-110 mg/l; dissolved oxygen 4.8-7.4; and NO3 0.20-1.20 mg/l. Low concentrations of NO3 suggest mainly low nutrient levels and oligotrophic conditions. There were rather large differences in chemical parameters between sample stations, mainly related to close-by human residences. Several river tributaries join the Indus between Basha and Tarbela. Catchment areas vary greatly. All streams pass along steep gradients through rocky areas of high mountains, exhibiting variable cascades. At confluences with other tributaries and the Indus River they discharge gravel and sand from river bed erosion. Water quality in the main tributaries was also surveyed during the summer of 2012. The water in these nullahs/streams was generally colorless, odorless, transparent and cool. Dissolved oxygen concentrations ranged from 5.0 to 10.0 mg/l and conductivity ranged from 28 to 105 µS/cm indicating variable but generally low concentrations of dissolved solids. During winter months temperatures were reported to be substantially lower: data averaged around 8°C, against some 20°C during summer. The banks of some tributaries show patches of vegetation. 3.2 FISH DIVERSITY Fish diversity in the Indus is low compared to other major rivers. 177 fish species are reported from the Indus River system, including 12 exotic species. This is substantially lower than in other major rivers in Asia; the Ganges houses 350 fish species, the Brahmaputra and the Mekong around 400, and the Hwang 320. Fish species of Northern Pakistan is given in Table 3.1. Five species of fish are recorded in the project area. The first of two sampling trips (6 persons, 10 days) yielded only 25 fish, and the second only 50, belonging to four species: three carps and one catfish. The distribution of sexes was equal. Nearly all fish were captured in small riffles and pools of tributaries; fish caught in the Indus River were mostly from confluence areas, close to the tributaries. The main reasons for poor fish diversity and density are the long torrential upper courses in the Himalayas, glacier fed water and high sediment load or low mean discharge rate of water. Fish sampling for the Diamer Basha Hydropower Project (2006) yielded 14 species, but also this can be considered low, probably due to high-altitude tributaries, low water temperature, high water velocity, low benthic productivity and long stretches of gorges. 3-1 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments Most species in the project area are members of the carp family (Cyprinidae) and loach family (Noemachcilidae). The piscifauna is dominated by endemic genera of the cyprinid sub-family Schizothoricinae (snow carps or snow trouts: Schizothorax, Esocinus and Labitus spp.) and one genus of the Noemachcilidae family (Triplophysa sp.) and one species of the Sisoridae family (the catfish Glyptosternum reticulatum). These genera inhabit torrential and swift streams and rivers of the mountain region and have evolved morphologic features adapted to these habitat conditions. In order to enhance fish production two species of Salmonidae (brown trout and rainbow trout) were introduced in the upper part of Indus in Gilgit river and adjoining streams during the early nineties. No brown/rainbow trout was observed in any of the samples. Downstream of the project site the number of species increases. From the area between Dasu and Pattan seven species are reported by fisheries authorities, especially from the tributaries. Prior to construction of the Tarbela dam, 35 fish species were recorded in the Indus River and tributaries around Tarbela. Snow carp and Mahaseer are the two important fish species of cold waters of Himalayan waters. Snow caprs are the major fish species in the Indus and as one moves to south to transitional or semicold waters, schizothoracines are joined by mahseers. The snow carp species and the two Mahaseer species (Tor putitora and Tor tor) were common and utilized as food fish. The other native fish species are resident species and have no commercial value. Table 3.1: Fish Species of Northern Pakistan Family / Species Local Name A – Indigenous species 1. Family – Cyprinidae Sub family – Schizothoracinae 1. Schizothorax plagiostomus Gahi, Cheemo 2. Schizothorax labiatus Chochan 3. Schizothorax esocinus Chakhat 4. Schizothorax skarduensis Khaduk 5. Schizothorax intermedius Khaduk 6. Schizothorax longipinnis Khaduk 7. Schizopygopsis stoliczkai - 8. Schizocypris curviforms - 9. Ptychobarbus conirostris - 10. Diptychus maculatus - 11. Racoma labiata Snowcarp 2. Family – Sisoridae 12. Glyptosternum reticulatum - 3. Family – Noemacheilidae 13. Triplophysa stoliczkai - 14. Triplophysa gracilius - 15. Triplophysa yaseenis - 16. Triplophysa trawovasea - 17. Triplophysa tenuicauda - 18. Triplophysa microps - B – Exotic species 4. Family – Salmonidae 19. Salmo trutta faria Brown Trout 3-2 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments Family / Species Local Name 20. Oncorhynchus Mysis Rainbow Trout 5. Family – Cyprinidae 21. Cyprinus carpio Chinese carp / Gulfam Source:M. Rafique (2000) Pak. Museum of National History, Islamabad. 3.3 SNOW CARPS HABITAT, MIGRATION AND SPWANING Schizothoracines (genera Schizothorax and Schizopyge) are the major fish of cold water streams and rivers of Himalayan regions, with the dominant species being Schizothorax plagiostomus. In Dasu project area three species of scizothorax (plagiostomus, esocinus and labitus) are present. Plagiostomus is the dominant fish species in Dasu area representing more than 75% of total fish catch and other two species represent about 15% of total fish catch. None of these species are listed in IUCN Red List. Habitat: Snow carps thrive in the snow fed river habitat of clear, shallow water of stony substratum with an average depth from 0.5 to 3 meters, and river flows with low to high velocities (0.5 to 1.5 m/s). Average temperature requirements are 4 to 20 oC and dissolved oxygen requirements are 8 to 12 mg/l. Snow carps are bottom feeders and mainly feed on peryphyitic algae and diatoms. During fish surveys, conducted in April and August of 2013 in the Indus and its tributaries in the Project area, fish found mainly in the tributaries, while in the mainstem they are found near the confluences. Migration: Snow carps are short distant migrants. In the project area, they migrate within the tributaries, not along the mainstem Indus. During April to September (spring and summer, high flow season), they prefer upstream head waters habitat at higher elevations. During September to April (low flow season and winter), they prefer lower elevations and confluence zone with Indus. The triggers for migrations are high flows, high sediment load and low temperatures. During spring, when flows started increasing in the rivers due to melting of snow, the fish migrate upstream from April and May (within tributaries) due to high flows and turbidity at lower elevations. During autumn, when the temperatures are starts to drop at higher elevations in head waters, the fish migrate downstream from September and October. Spawning: Female fishes spawn in two seasons, one in September-October and other in March - April. Sexually matured snow carp (when they reach 18-24 cm length, at the age of 2-3 years) spawn in tributaries in clear water (along stream banks, backwater pools and near confluences of other tributaries and Indus) on gravelly/stony ground or on fine pebbles at 10-30 cm depth. Low water currents of 0.5- 1.5 m/sec, pH 7.5, dissolved oxygen concentration of 8-12 mg/L and gravel size of 50-60 mm is the optimum conditions for spawning. 3.4 MAHASEER Golden Mahaseer (Tor Putitora) is a long distant migratory and endangered fish species of Indus. Snow caprs are the major fish species in the Indus and as one moves to south to transitional or semicold waters, schizothoracines are joined by mahseers. Mahaseer habitat starts about 70 to 80 km downstream of the DHP damsite. Tor species habituated in slow moving streams and rivers of the foothill regions and bred in gravels and sandy beds. Mahaseer is reported to ascend the Indus River to Besham Qila and above and to spawn in Allai Khwar which has been described as the last upstream safe- haven for the species. The Golden Mahaseer was the primary quality food fish in the region and an attractive fish for anglers. Its economic significance was substantial. However, due to permanent deep submergence of many natural breeding grounds of Mahaseer in the Tarbela reservoir, natural propagation of the species drastically declined. Mahaseer migrated into upstream tributaries where breeders were 3-3 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments indiscriminately fished; enforcement of protective regulations proved to be ineffective. During fish sampling in the Dasu project area no Mahaseer specimen could be caught; local people confirmed its absence from the area. In recent literature the information on the status of Mahaseer is often called somewhat exaggerated. Although a considerable impact from the Tarbela project cannot be denied, there is still a reasonable proportion of Mahaseer in total catches, especially in the rivers Haro, Soan and Korang (60-80 percent). Even in the Tarbela reservoir Golden Mahaseer maintains a share of 5-11 percent in the catches. 3-4 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments 4 METHODOLOGY This chapter includes the methodology being adopted to get the required information for assessing the in-depth knowledge and feedback for the impacts of the proposed project on downstream fishing communities. 4.1 TASKS This study evaluatessocio-economic impacts on fishing communities downstream of Dasu Dam up to Tarbela Reservoir reach. The main focus of this study is to determine the impacts of Dasu Hydropower Project (DHP) development on fishermen populations and other direct and indirect stakeholders of fishery downstream of the Dam axis to Tarbela Reservoir site as shown in Figure4.1. Figure4.1: Dasu Dam Reservoir and Downstream Area The present study provides the baseline conditions of the downstream fishing communities and assessment of adverse impactsalongwith their mitigation measures. 4-1 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments 4.2 STUDY AREA The study area for downstream impacts study on fishing communities starts from downstream of Dasu dam axis and ends at Tarbela reservoir reach. Four districts were covered in this study area. The length of study area was approximately 200Km along the river Indus. District wise study area is given in Table 4.1 and study area map is given in Figure 4.2. Table 4.1: District wise Study Area Sr. No. District Location No. of Surveyed Villages 1. Kohistan Dasu Dam Axis to Sholgara 10 2. Shangla Besham to Carkool Khas 8 3. Battagram Thakot Colony to Ghoriyaar 2 4. Torgher Sado Khan to Zozari Seeri 2 Figure 4.2: Study Area showing Downstream Settlements 4.3 SAMPLING TECHNIQUE Since it was not possible to include the entire population due to resource and temporal constraints, a representative sample was considered in the study. Random sampling was used to select the persons to be interviewed to avoid human bias influencing the choice. As the study assessed a statistically representative sample of the stakeholder group, the data are statistically representative of the entire population. 4-2 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments For the survey, village representative or identifying persons were interviewed and from that information, village profile was prepared. With the help of these representatives / identifying persons further five fishermen in each of respective village were selected and interviewed. Then,extensive consultation and discussionswere was done with the concerned Communities in their village. 4.4 PRIMARY DATA COLLECTION Primary data were collected by the field survey team. For this purpose a comprehensive baseline survey was conducted. The main tool used in this survey was the questionnaires. A set of three kinds of questionnaires, i) interviews with Identifying Persons/ key informants; ii) Village community group discussion; and iii) interviews with Fishermen were performed. The questionnaires used in this study are given in Appendix A. These questionnaires contained a combination of both specific and open-ended questions along with certain guided questions, where necessary. The field survey team included two fishery experts and a sociologist. The survey team visited the project area in May 2013 and collected the data. The techniques used for data collection are as follow: 4.4.1 Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) At all main spots/villages in the downstream area to get insight of the fishing community, focus group discussions were conducted. This activity led to the participation of both fishing and relevant community in the discussion for required information and perceptions of the fishermen community. 4.4.2 In-depth Interviews (IDIs) With the officials of provincial Fisheries Department of all the relavent districts in the downstream areas of Dasu Dam Axis, formal in-depth interviews were taken. These officials are handling the fisheries sector in their respective districts. Information about the department’s working, fishing status, fish fauna and the secondary data was collected from the offices. Also, Trout Fish Hatchery in particular was visited to see the prospects in future after the project development in project affected area. 4.4.3 Sample Survey through Questionnaire Filling For sample survey, questionnaires of the fishermen were filled on sample basis in the villages of downstream area. This activity led to have the household information of a fisherman in terms of his socio-economic conditions. 4.5 SECONDARY DATA COLLECTION The secondary data were collected from published material and locally posted government officials such as the Assistant Director Fisheries, Pattan (Kohistan), Assistant Director Fisheries, Alpuri (Shangla), Assistant Director Fisheries, Battagram, Assistant Director Fisheries, Mansera/Thakot, Depty Director Fisheries, Khalabat/Tarbela. 4.6 LIMITATIONS IN THE STUDY (i) The information presented here are collected from survey of 110 fishermen (18% of total fishing community) from 22 surveyed villages; community consultations in 22 villages, and meetings with six fisheries officials’, due to limitations of time resource. (ii) Fishermen do not maintain records on fishing and socio-economic conditions and therefore validity of information provided by the respondents is subjective as they informed. However personal judgment was used interactively at certain places. 4-3 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments 5 SOCIO-ECONOMIC BASELINE CONDITIONS This section provides the baseline socio-economic conditions of the concerned districts and the fishing communities in the downstream study area. 5.1 DISTRICTS POFILES 5.1.1 Kohistan According to the 1998 Census, the total population of Kohistan was 472,570. The male to female ratio was 124.4 (i.e. for every 100 females, there are 124.4 males). At the time of the 5th Population Census in 1998, Kohistan had three Tehsils, of which Dasu had the highest population with 184,746; Palas had 165,613; and Pattan 122,244. Population density was 63.1 people per sq. km. Both literacy and enrolment rates in Kohistan are among the lowest in the country. Only one-quarter of the population is active economically. The female labor force participation is less than 1 percent.The 1998 Census reported the district’s literacy rate among those aged 10 years and above, as 11.1 percent, but there were significant gender differences: male literacy was 17.23 percent and female literacy 2.95 percent. The total school enrolment rate was 6.89 percent (10.60 percent for males and 1.34 percent for females). Fishery department exists and actively involved in issuing licenses for fish catch and fishery development. 5.1.2 Shangla According To 1998 Census, the total population of Shangla was 434,563 with an average annual growth rate of 3.27 percent. The male to female ratio was 106.1 (i.e. for every 100 females, there are 106.1 males). The population density was 274 persons per sq. km.The district’s literacy rate among those aged 10 years and above, as 14.73 percent, male literacy was 25.16 percent and female literacy 3.71 percent.Shangla district had 5 tehsils and 24 union councils. Fishery department exists and actively involved in issuing licenses for fish catch and fishery development. 5.1.3 Battagram According To 1998 Census, the total population of Batagram was 307,278 with an average annual growth rate of 0.58 percent. The male to female ratio was 106.6 (i.e. for every 100 females, there are 106.6 males). The population density was 236.2 persons per sq. km. The district’s literacy rate among those aged 10 years and above, as 18.31 percent, male literacy was 29.40 percent and female literacy 6.48 percent. Batagram district had 2 tehsils and 20 union councils. Fishery department exists and actively involved in issuing licenses for fish catch and fishery development. 5.1.4 Torgher Torgher was given the status of district in 2010. It was a part of district Mansehra before this. No official Census data was available. According to unofficial sources, the present population of district is 170,000. Fishery department exists but not fully active in issuing fish catch licenses etc. 5.2 HOUSEHOLDS INVOLVED IN FISHING IN SAMPLE VILLAGES In downstream of DHP the Indus River passes through four districts of KP province, up to Tarbela reservoir area and there are about 50 villages along the river. Out of which during downstream baseline fishing communities’ survey, twenty two main villages (44%) in four districts were surveyed located on both left and right bank of river Indus. The survey data details are shown in Appendix B (B-1 – B-7). Overall Households involved in fishing were 626(11.8%) out of 5,294 total households of twenty two sampled villages. District Kohistan and Shangla have selected villages on both banks (Left and Right) of the river. While, the Battagram and Torgher districts exist on the left bank of Indus River. In District Kohistan fishermen HHs living on left bank (16.9%) are higher in number than 5-1 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments right bank (8%) of the river. Similar trend was observed in Shangla District (Table 5.1) and details shown in Appendix B (B-1). Table 5.1: District-wise Villages &Households involved in Fishing Overall HHs Percentage Location No. of HHs Sr. of the of HHs District (Right/ Villages Involved No. Sampled involved in Left) Surveyed in Fishing Villages Fishing Right 5 1,040 83 8.0 1. Kohistan Left 5 2,304 390 16.9 Right 5 970 62 6.4 2. Shangla Left 3 180 28 15.6 3. Battagram Left 2 140 28 20 4. Torgher Left 2 660 35 5.3 2 Right/ Total 4 22 5,294 626 11.8 4 Left 5.3 FISHING GEAR The common fishing gear used in the study area is gill net (83%) to catch the fish from the river. The fishermen also use hook & line (73%) and cast net (20%). The fishermen use cast net to catch fish from tributaries only. Among fishermen, the use of a combination of fishing gear is common (Table 5.2). Only in District Torgher, two fishermen admitted during the consultations, informal discussion that poison is also used for the fish catch. The details are shown in Appendix B (B-2). Table 5.2: Districtwise Use of Fishing Gear by the Fishermen No of Fishing Gear Location fishermen Sr. No. District (Right/ Cast Hook & HHs Gill Net Poison Blast Left) Net Line surveyed 12 Right 25 19 (76%) 22 (88%) - - 1. Kohistan (48%) Left 25 9 (36%) 17 (68%) 19 (76%) - - 25 Right 25 01 (4%) 11 (44%) - - (100%) 2. Shangla 15 15 Left 15 - - - (100%) (100%) 3. Battagram Left 10 - 07 (70%) 09 (90%) - - 4. Torgher Left 10 - 08 (80%) 04 (40%) 02 (20%) - 2 Right 22 Total 4 110 91 (83%) 80 (73%) 02 (1.8%) - and 4 Left (20%) 5.4 AVERAGE FISH CATCH The overall average catch is 4.12 kg/day. On an average the fishermen practice fishing about 18 days in a month. The trend of fish catching significantly decreases from Kohistan to Torgher district areas. The highest fish catch (5.04 kg/day) recorded in district Kohistan while lowest (2.02kg/day) in district Torgher. Month-wise fishing practice also decreases towards downstream in the study area (Table 5.3). The details are shown in Appendix B (B- 3). 5-2 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments Table 5.3: Districtwise Fish Catch by surveyedFishermen Average Sr. Location No of fishermen District Catch Days/ Month Months/ Year No. (Right/ Left) HHs surveyed (kg/Day) Right 25 5.04 19.16 5.94 1. Kohistan Left 25 4.55 12.74 5.04 Right 25 4.03 21.38 3.72 2. Shangla Left 15 4.06 21.70 3.78 3. Battagram Left 10 3.13 18.85 2.1 4. Torgher Left 10 2.02 13.15 3.1 2 Right and Total 4 110 4.12 17.99 4.33 4 Left 5.5 END USE OF FISH CATCH Usually, the fish catching is for domestic consumption. 73 fishermen (66%) catch fish only for domestic consumption while 27 fishermen (34%) catch fish for domestic consumption but also sell a part of it. There is no middle man concept in this region. There is no designated fish market in the studied area. People sell their catch to local fish vendors. Detail of fish vendors are mentioned in Appendix-A. Some people also sell their catch on nearby road to the passersby. Some fishermen sell their catch directly to different landlords and officials. The fishermen of Shangla (left side) and Torgher District practice fishing only for domestic use (Table 5.4). The detail of end use of fish catch is shown in Table 5.5 and Appendix B (B-.3). Table 5.4: Districtwise End Use of Fish Catch No of End use Sr. Location (Right/ District fishermen HHs Domestic + No. Left) Domestic use surveyed Commercial Right 25 16 (64%) 9 (36%) 1. Kohistan Left 25 15 (60%) 10 (40%) Right 25 22 (88%) 3 (12%) 2. Shangla Left 15 15 (100%) 0 3. Battagram Left 10 5 (50%) 5 (50%) 4. Torgher Left 10 10 (100%) 0 2 Right and 4 Total 4 110 73 (66%) 27 (34%) Left Table 5.5: Downstream Fishermen and their Livelihood Trend Overall HHs HHs % age of HHs Sr. River Name of District of Sampled Involved Involved in End Use No. bank Village Village in Fishing Fishing Kohistan 1. R Siglo 30 8 26.7 Domestic Domestic + 2. L Chuchang 104 10 9.6 Commercial 3. L Goshali 300 100 33.3 Domestic Domestic + 4. L Jalkot 1000 150 15.0 Commercial 5. R Kuz Kereo 40 25 62.5 Domestic 6. L Shilkan Abad 500 80 16.0 Domestic 7. L Ghaziabad 400 50 12.5 Domestic Domestic + 8. R Patten 800 25 3.1 Commercial Domestic + 9. R Dubair colony 100 15 15.0 Commercial 5-3 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments 10. R Sholgara 70 10 14.3 Domestic Right side 1040 83 8.0 Left side 2304 390 16.9 Overall (Kohistan) 3344 473 14.1 Shangla 1. R Besham 300 20 6.7 Domestic 2. R Seror Shang 50 7 14.0 Domestic 3. R Shaga Banda 120 10 8.3 Domestic 4. L Sajbir 100 8 8.0 Domestic 5. L Gim Baara 40 8 20.0 Domestic 6. L Abun 40 12 30.0 Domestic 7. R Daut 350 15 4.29 Domestic + Commercial 8. R Carkool 150 10 6.67 Domestic Right side 970 62 6.4 Left side 180 28 15.6 Overall (Shangla) 1150 90 7.8 Battagra 1. L Thakot 80 20 25.0 Domestic + m colony Commercial 2. L Ghoriyaar 60 8 13.3 Domestic Overall (Battagram) 140 28 20 Torgher 1. L Sado Khan 360 15 4.2 2. L Zozari Seeri 300 20 6.7 Domestic Overall (Torgher) 660 35 5.3 Right side total 10 villages 2010 145 7.2 Left side total 12 villages 3284 481 14.6 Domestic consumption in 16 village 2860 391 13.7 Domestic + commercial use in 6 2434 235 9.7 villages Over all total 22 villages 5294 626 11.8 5.6 FISH CATCH LOCATIONS Fishing will be carried out mostly in tributaries and occasionally in Indus during low flow season of winter near the confluence areas. Fishermen pointed out during the consultations/informal discussion that riverine fishes are more health promoting and tasty. The details of fishing locations are givenin Appendix B (B-4). 5.7 AVERAGE INCOME FROM FISHING Out of twenty two surveyed villages, the twenty seven fishermen of six villages sell part of their fish catch. The overall average income of household is Rs. 146,667/year.The income from fishing is Rs. 58,641(40% per annum). The highest average HH income from fishing in District Kohistan is Rs. 73,621 i.e., 49% of total income. However, these fishermen do not catch fish regularly (Table 5.7). The highest income from fish catch is in Pattan which is Rs. 142,650 (86%). The details are shown in Appendix B (B- 5&B-6). 5-4 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments Table 5.4: Annual Fishermen’ Income in Different Downstream Districts Percentage Ave. Ave. Income Location of HHs Sr. Income of of HHs From District (Right/ Village name Income from No. HHs/Year Fishing/Year Left) Fishing/Year (PKR) (PKR) (PKR) Left Chuchang 115200 62,000 53.82 Left Jalkot 160800 35,800 22.26 Kohistan Right Patten 165600 142,650 86.14 1. Right Dubair Colony 162000 49,140 30.33 Left side 138000 48,900 38.04 Right side 164000 101,090 61.64 Overall (Kohistan) 150316 73,621 48.98 2. Shangla Right Dawoot 152000 23,667 15.57 3. Battagram Left Thakot Colony 129600 22,700 20.83 4. Torgher - - - - - Overall 146667 58,641 40 5.8 LITERACY LEVEL OF FISHERMEN Total twenty two villages were surveyed situated alongside the bank of River Indus taking five fishermen from each village. Out of 110 fishermen, 53 (47%) were not literate, 19 (17%) fishermen were educated up to primary and 18(16%) have passed middle school grade. The other 6 (5%) fishermen are educated to a matric level. Only one fisherman has education up to master level. The details are shown in Appendix B (B-7). Table 5.5: District wise Surveyed LiteracyLevel of Fishermen No. of Fishermen LiteracyLevel District Surveyed Villages Illiterate Primary Middle Matric Inter B.A Master Kohistan 10 12 12 11 8 3 3 1 Shangla 8 28 5 4 2 1 - - Battagram 2 8 1 1 - - - - Torgher 2 4 1 2 1 2 - - 52 19 18 11 6 3 1 Overall (47%) (17%) (16%) (10%) (5%) (3%) (1%) 5.9 AGE AND MARITAL STATUS OF FISHERMEN Of the 110 consulted, 8(7%) fishermen are up to 20 years of age, 53(36%) fishermen is between 21 and 35 years, 46 fishermen (42%) are between 36 to 50 years and 9 fishermen (8%) are between 51 to 65 years of age while one fishermen not respond. Ninety eight (89%) out of the total of 110 surveyed fishermen, 98 (89%) are married while remaining 12(11%) fishermen were single. The details are shown in Appendix B (B-7). 5-5 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments Table 5.6: District wise Age and Marital Status of Surveyed Fishermen No. of Age of Fishermen Married status Not District Surveyed Up Above Responded 21-35 36-50 51-65 Single Married Villages to 20 65 Kohistan 10 3 31 9 5 1 1 6 44 Shangla 8 1 15 21 2 1 - 4 36 Battagram 2 1 2 4 2 1 - 1 9 Torgher 2 3 5 2 - - - 1 9 8 53 46 9 3 1 12 98 Overall 22 (7%) (48%) (42%) (8%) (3%) (1%) (11%) (89%) 5-6 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments 6 CONSULTATIONS AND DISCUSSION This chapter presents consultations and discussions carried out during the study in 2013 on downstream impacts. A major objective was to consult concerned persons and communities and list their information and concerns regarding Dasu Hydropower Project Development related to fish catching including their expectations regarding any support and mitigation measures. 6.1 CONSULTATIONS CONDUCTED DURING STUDY During the project detailed design stage, visits and consultations with major community engaged in fishing and living along the river. For this study, scoping sessions were held with persons in the villages on both banks starting from Dasu Dam Axis to Tarbela reservoir reach. Also, concerning districts officials of provincial Fisheries Department were consulted. On the basis of these scoping sessions and consultation, an assessment of the views of the community and officials was made regarding their perceptions, apprehensions and reactions about the construction of the Dasu Hydropower Project and its impacts on downstream area in relevance to fishing and others. However, these scoping activities were undertaken in all major areas and villages along the river on both banks. About 229 persons attended the discussion in 22 different sessions at different locations throughout the project downstream area including 6 in- depth interviews with Fisheries Department Officialsis shown in Table 6.1. (Appendix D) Table 6.1: Consultations Undertaken during Study on Downstream Impacts Community Head/Official No. of No. Date Venue/Situation Consulted Respondents a) Focus Group discussions with Fishing Community 1. 17-05-13 Siglo Ashraf Khan 11 2. 18-05-13 Chuchang Abdul Jabbar 15 3. 18-05-13 Goshali Sher Khan 13 4. 18-05-13 Jalkot Faiz malik 16 5. 19-05-13 Kuz Kereo Rahim Dad 18 6. 19-05-13 Shilkanabad Abdul Qayoom 14 7. 19-05-13 Ghaziabad Ijaz Ali 10 8. 19-05-13 Patten Ibrahim 18 9. 20-05-13 Dubair colony Khan Muhammad 10 10. 20-05-13 Sholgara Muhammad Duraj 18 11. 21-05-13 Besham Shah Khalid 13 12. 22-05-13 Seror Shang Umer Tesar 11 13. 22-05-13 Shaga Banda Gul Nabi 10 14. 23-05-13 Sajbir Zafar Khan 12 15. 24-05-13 Gim Baara Umer Zada 13 16. 25-05-13 Abun Janat Gul 10 17. 25-05-13 Dawoot Abdul Aziz 16 18. 26-05-13 Carkool Sangeen 14 19. 27-05-13 Thakot colony Mujahidin 12 20. 28-05-13 Ghoriyaar Munawar Khan 17 21. 29-05-13 Sado Khan Rehman Zada 15 22. 30-05-13 Zozari Seeri Wajid Ali 13 Total 229 b) In-depth Interviews with Fisheries Department Officials 1. 21.5.13 District Taj Muhammad (Assistant 1 6-1 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments officeFisheries, DirectorFisheries, Kohistan district) Patton District office Shahid Mahmood (Assistant 2. 23.5.13 1 Fisheries, Alpuri Director Fisheries, Shangla district) District office Faheem Akhtar (Assistant Director 3. 26.5.13 1 Fisheries, Battagram Fisheries, Battagram distric) District office, Akbar Khan (Assistant 4. 28.5.13 1 Torgher Commissioner, Torgher district) District office Khalid Khan (Assistant Director 5. 29.5.13 1 Fisheries, Manshera Fisheries, Torgher/Manshera) Muhammad Shafi Marwat (Depty District office 6. 30.5.13 Director Fisheries, Haripur/Tarbela 1 Fisheries, Haripur Dam) .Total 6 The main expectations of the co.mmunity at different locations during consultations mainly at that time were: (1) jobs in. the project; (2) technical training by the project; and (3) support for development of fisheries in their area. 6.2 CONSULTATIONS – DASU DAM CONSTRUCTION AND DOWNSTREAM IMPACTS During the study, starting from 17th to 30th in May 2013, a series of downstream community consultation meetings and focus group discussions were conducted bwith particular focus on project information, fishing, income and livelihood, impacts, mitigation measures and expectations etc. Key discussion points and description are listed in Table 6.2. List of identify persons, district officials and fish vendors is given in Appendix D (D1 to D-3). The photo-log of consultation meetings is given in Appendix E. Table 6.2: List of Key Issues Discussed Issues Perception of the Fishing Community Information on Generally, the fishermen communities in the downstream area of the DasuHydropower project know about development of the Dasu Hydropower project. Project They generally don’t know how and when the project will be implemented. . Possible Impacts of the The community living near the towns is a general idea that the Project on Fishing construction of the dam will affect fish in the river. They are of the opinion that the dam will restrict water flow which will lead to lessen the fish in the main stream of the river. Some people have reported that in some occassions they also collect wood (during high flow season, when they were deposited on the banks) from riversand make some money (not as a reguar source of income) Fishermen There in the entire project downstream area, no fishermen Organization organization exists even, some of them responded that they don’t even understand it. Situation of Fish in the Community is well aware that presence of fish in Indus is limited and River and Nullahs fishmaily occurs in the nullahs (tributaries). Generaly they do not fish in Indus due to deep waterand highwater currents. They fish mainly in tributaries and however,during low flow season (winter) they also prefer to catch fish near Indus river bank where speed and depth of the water is low. The reason only being is less resources and expensive nets.They mentioned clearly that the fish (Swati, snow carp) is mainlypresent in the nullahs. Skills in Fish Catching The fishing community catches fish with the help of nets and other traditional methods. At some places, they also told that other non- traditional methods like poison; blasting and electric current is also used in fish catching. Mostly, the catching is through nets of different types. Fish Consumption The information reveals that all the fish catching households 6-2 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments consume fish on alternate day in a month. Mainly the fishing community is marginal and catches fish for their household consumption. Fish Selling Very less community at certain areas which are closer to towns, sell fish. They sell fish to get income/money for arranging their other household need like grocery or the general expenditures. Prospect Buyers All the commercial fishermen told that they sell fish in the nearby markets as well as to direct buyers in the area who ask to provide fish at their doorsteps. There are some small restaurants in the towns, the owners of which also buy fish from them. Role of Gender In discussion with the community, it was found that there is no role of gender in fish catching except cooking in their own houses or maximum to the repair of nets but in very rare cases. Suggestions or The downstream fishing communities demand employment in the Proposals for Impact project during construction and in post-construction periods. In one of mitigation the meetings, a request was made for free vocational training for boys to prepare themselves for employment in the project. Some of the fishermen proposed that better nets may be provided to the community for more fishing to have better consumption and livelihood. Further, some asked for some fish ponds in their area etc. 6.3 FEEDBACK FROM CONSULTATIONS 6.3.1 Overall Information and Attitude towards the Project The overall attitude of the communities towards the Project is positive, they support the Project and substantial assistance has been provided to the consultant team for carrying out downstream impacts study. However, at some places, there are concerns on the impact on fish and fish catch. That situation considerably changed after the description of the project as being a run-of-river and river flow continuation. 6.3.2 Key Concerns of Downstream Communities The key concerns raised in the consultation meetings are mainly relating to lessening in fish catch from the river. The community who were well aware of the project emphasised that project should assist the fishing community in terms of the needs like livelihood opportunities, trainings and jobs in the project and others as this all may not happen for them as being from outside the project area. 6.4 FEEDBACK FROM IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS WITH DEPARTMENTAL OFFICIALS The method of the in-depth interviews with the officials of the Provincial Fisheries Department was direct meeting and pre-planned meeting and using the segments as follows: (i) a brief presentation on the technical/engineering design; (ii) a presentation on the project social and environmental impacts; (iii) status of fish in the river and main nullahs; (iv) fish catching from the river; (v) licensing and penalties on illegal fishing; (vi) downstream impacts of dam construction; (vii) mitigation of the impacts; and (viii) recommendations and proposals. A total of 6 in-depth interviews with4 district heads including Assistant Commissioner, Torgher district. During all the in-depth interviews with the officials of Provincial Fisheries Department, it was expressed by them that the Dasu Hydropower Project is not a project only for Kohistan District;it has country wide significance since electricity would be available to the entire country. Therefore, this is a project of national significance. The key outcomes of the meetings are summarized below: 6-3 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments  Fish is caught mainly for food, income and sports.  The fishing activities are more predominant in tributariesthan the main stream of Indus River. In the downstream of the dam site up to Dubair Khawar, much of the fishing is practiced in the tributaries located on both side of Indus, and partially from from Indus. Fishermendepend mostly on fish meat for household consumption. There is a project in running by the KP government for the development of trout and establishing fish ponds at certain spots both in the up and downstream area but the capacity of the community is low in managing those. Government or the Project at the start of the project may start some training programme for skill enhancement of the fishing community.  The public sector due to its weak organization and resources is unable to regulate fishing in the area instead; the officials facilitate and motivate the community for fishing.  Awareness rising for the community about size, breeding season and species is the must for protecting the endangered species.  In the middle reach of the downstream area ranging around Besham, community is not dependent on fish as being some well-off but; the method of fishing sometimes is not appropriate.  For the promotion of fishery in entire downstream of the Dasu Project area, Information, Education & Communication (IEC) material may be developed and distributed which will help in organizing the fishing.  There are people who occasionallycatch wood logs (when there were huge landslides during flood season on the upstream (both Indus and tributaries) uproot trees or when the illegal logging in the upstream accidentally drifted downstream) and use for domestic consumption and also sell in the market. But it is not a regular acitivity in the area and also not a regular source of income to the community. The inflow of logs in to Indus and tributaries have been reduced considerabley in recent years due to conservation measures taken upstream by the foreest departments.  The project may support downstream fishing communities by giving them assistance in livelihood resources, education or technical training or investment in the small ponds establishment at suitable places in collaboration with the relevant fishermen. The coordination with the provincial Fisheries Department will play a positive role in sustainability of the local developments. 6.5 INCORPORATION OF FEEDBACK AND CONCERNS All outcomes, feedbacks and concerns from various consultation meetings, surveys and interviews have been considered in the detail design phase to mitigate the concerns of downstream fishing community. Some of the proposals, demands and mitigation measures are beyond the jurisdiction of WAPDA but for such activities, WAPDA will consult and coordinate with KP provincial government on addressing these matters. 6-4 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments 7 IMPACTS Potential impacts of DHP on the downstream fish are explained in detail in EIA report. A summary of this report is presented in this chapter.The following social and environmental effects of DHP during construction and operational stage are studied:  Impact on fish habitat during construction activities on the river  Impact on fish migration  Impact on fish habitat in the upstream of Indus and tributaries due to formation of reservoir  Impact on fish habitat and ecological connectivity of about 4 km dewatered section between dam and tailrace  Impact on fish habitat on downstream of Indus due to reservoir operations due to change in downstream water quality, temperature and sediment  Impacts on fishermen in fish catch thereby effecting the income and livelihood as well as household fish consumption Mitigation measures adopted to reduce aboveimpacts to acceptable and minor levels are also presented in this section. 7.1 IMPACT ON FISH AND FISH HABITAT DURING CONSTRUCTION Potential Effects: Construction activities within the river (coffer dams, main dam and diversion tunnels) and along banks will have potential to adversely affect aquatic biota by release of high concentrations of sediment, fuels/oils and other toxic compounds, and solid waste and use of explosives. Sediment concentrations above natural levels can cause mortality of biota directly; for fish, damaged gills and sediment clogging of gill chambers eventually leads to death. Indirectly, sediment deposition downstream can affect biota by altering habitat features and reduced benthic production and food abundance for herbivorous fish such as snow carp and fish preying on algae-feeding invertebrates. Toxic compounds can have direct lethal and sub-lethal effects on organisms or have indirect effects for example by reducing food-organisms. Solid wastes can be ingested causing injury or death and can impair habitat. Explosives can kill aquatic organisms immediately or cause sufficient damage to internal organs even at long distances that death will eventually occur. Mitigation: Mitigation measures proposed in project’s environmental management plans to control sediment releases in construction areas will minimize potential adverse effects on aquatic resources. Similarly measures outlined in environmental management plans regarding use and handling of fuels, explosives and other hazardous materials and control and disposal of solid waste will also minimize potential adverse effects on aquatic biota. No explosives are planned for underwater during construction. 7.2 IMPACT ON FISH MIGRATION Potential Effects: Snow carp is the main fish species in the project area. Snow carp habitat is mainly located along the tributaries and in Indus it is found only near the confluence areas during winter when the water currents and turbidity levels in Indus are very low. Snow carp is a short distant migrantand it migrates within the tributaries from lower elevations to head waters of the tributaries, not along the main Indus. Mahaseer, a long distant migratory fish in Indus is located about 70 to 80 km downstream of Dasu dam site and its migration starts further downstream. Hence Dasu dam will create any barrier to migratory fish in Indus. Mitigation: No mitigation measures are proposed. Further studies and monitoring of fish will be carried out through project implementation to understand their biological behavior and address if any impacts are noticed. 7-1 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments 7.3 IMPACT ON UPSTREAM FISH HABITAT Potential Effects:Habitat upstream of the dam will be changed from current riverine habitat to lake-like habitat commencing with first-filling of the reservoir once dam construction has been completed. Physical, chemical and biological conditions along the Indus River will be altered from current conditions, though river-like attributes, notably high water velocity in upstream segments of the reservoir, will be retained. Habitat in lower portions of tributaries will be submerged and replaced in some locations by small embayments. Overall reservoir habitat, including newly formed embayments in tributary valleys, will rapidly be reduced due to sedimentation. This may affect the breeding and spawning sites of the snow carp in the tributaries and confluence points. Mitigation:Fish hatchery will be developed for production of artificial seed of snow carps, which will be stocked in the tributaries and river stretches downstream and upstream of the dam to compensate the loss of natural spawning grounds and enhancing the fish stocks affected by dam. Further, spawning grounds will be maintained and/or developed near the new confluence areas of the tributaries and reservoirs. Maintaining spawning grounds include depositing gravel to increase the spawning habitat; manipulating angular and large boulders to create pools for spawning and as an escape cover for fish during low water levels. Further studies and monitoring will be carried out as part of project’s environmental management plan to monitor and address the impacts on fish. 7.4 IMPACT ON THE DOWNSTREAM UP TO TAILRACE OUTLET Potential Effects:The river reach between dam-axis to tailrace discharge point is about 4.4 km long. During June to September, when the average river flow is higher than 2600 m3/s, the excess water will be discharged through the spillways/low level outlets of the dam. However, during October to May, when the average flow is less than 2,600 m 3/s, there will be no water released downstream of the dam and all the water will be diverted to the power house and will be released to the river through tailrace outlet (. A small tributary, Siglo stream joins the Indus in this reach (about 1.2 km downstream of dam). The average annual runoff from Siglo stream is 1.7 m3/s with average runoffs less than 0.5 m3/s during low flow season, which indicates most part of this section will be dry during low flow season.The riverine ecosystem component that will be affected between the dewatered sectionis aquatic ecosystem and aesthetics. Mitigation Measures: An environmental flow of 20 m3/s is recommended to be released from dam as environmental flow in line with the Tarbela/Ghazi Barotha Hydropower in Indus (which has a dewatered section of 54 km Indus). In addition it is recommended to always operate one turbine and release 222.5 m3/s of water from tailrace. Thus maximum length of the dewatered section will receive about 242 m3/s of environmental flow. The release of environmental flows represents 44% of average winter flows, 67 to 97% of average winter depth, 72 to 95% average winter wetted perimeter, and 4 to 7% of average winter velocities. Below tailrace, the instantaneous inflow to the dam will be equal to the instantaneous outflow from the dam during run-of-river operations, or minimum 242 m3/s of environmental flow will be maintained downstream of tailrace if the reservoir will be operated as peaking plant after construction of Diamer Basha dam. 7.5 IMPACT ON DOWNSTREAM WATER QUALITY Potential Effects: Generally water quality in reservoirs will be deteriorated due to thermal stratification and depletion of dissolved oxygen at deeper levels. Average water retention time (residence time) in the reservoir is an important determinant of the extent of the change in water quality. Generally, long retention times in the reservoir will affect the reservoir water quality through changes in dissolved oxygen, eutrophication and thermal stratification. Average water retention time in Dasu reservoir found to be very short varying from 1 to 6 days during high flow season, and about 19 days during low 7-2 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments flow season. The impacts on water quality are estimated to be minor due to these short retention times. Mitigation Measures: Temperature and oxygen sensors will be used for continuous monitoring of their levels in the reservoir near the dam. If low oxygen conditions are evident during monitoring prior to flushing, a lead-in period may be required whereby the lower-level outlets are used to draw out low oxygen-concentration lower-elevation water in combination with spillway releases to provide adequate oxygen concentrations in water downstream of the plunge pool. 7.6 CHANGE IN DOWNSTREAM SEDIMENT Potential Effects: Under natural conditions, seasonal scouring typically would occur during the summer high flow period, with some particles setting in low-energy areas of the river (e.g., back eddies and small embayments).Downstream habitat, particularly depositional areas where sediments normally would accumulate, will be altered with chronic non-replenishment of particle sizes removed by the reservoir. Some but not all sediment trapped in the reservoir will be released downstream in pulses during periodic flushing of sediment from the reservoir after 15 years of operation. Overall downstream aquatic habitat will experience a net decrease in sediment deposition and associated change in biotic assemblages, likely favoring species that will benefit from reduced amounts of sand and gravel in seasonal deposition and scouring cycles. However, very fine sediments will continue to pass through dam site. Further sedimentation will be brought to Indus through tributaries located on the downstream of the dam. Mitigation: Mitigation measures are not proposed because retention of sediment in the reservoir could yield a net benefit to downstream biota and resource use. Environmental effects monitoring during the DHP operations phase will include downstream sample stations and methods selected to assess long-term ecological effects of reduced sediment and, as necessary, with findings used to support development of adaptive mitigation measures. 7.7 IMPACTS ON THE FISH CATCHES AND LIVELIHOOD OF FISHERMEN Potential Effects: It is difficult to estimate the reduction in fish yield and impact on livelihood of fishermen. The impact on the downstream fish yield will mainly occur within 4.4 km of from downstream of the dam. Further downstream the impact on fish yield will be minimal during regular operation of the project due to changes in water quality and sediment flow. During construction stage also the impacts will be minimal if the environmental management plans are properly implemented. Mitigation Measures: Implementation of environmental management plans during construction activities and release of environmental flows will mitigate any impacts on the downstream fisheries. Further monitoringwill be carried on the fish yield. To enhance the natural fisheries in the downstream tributaries and Indus, it is recommended to establish a fish hatchery of snow carps and stock the tributaries and Indus with fingerlings. It is also recommended to raise awareness among the local population for the need to protect fishery resource to avoid fishing in spawning season (March/April and September/October). In addition it is also recommended that the project will take up education and outreach to address information needs related to fisheries in the downstream area including some training programme for skill enhancement of the fishing community as an enhancement measure. 7.8 IMPACTS ON OTHER STAKEHOLDERS There is no established fish market in the study areas. There are four fish vendors in the project downstream as given in Appendix D (D-3). They areinvolved in selling fish both in uncooked and cooked form in local market. These vendors purchased fishes directly 7-3 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments from local fishermen which sell the part of their catch. There is no middle man involved in fish selling because the number of catch is small. The fish vendors not totally dependent on the supply of fish catch by local fishermen. The major sell fish of fish vendors belong to other water bodies. The fish vendors of this studied area sell fish after purchasing the other fish species from other cities like Swat. Furthermore, the fish sell duration in study area is very limited. The fish vendors sell fish as a part time. During field survey and village community based discussion, it was found that there are no fishermen’s organizations working in the area. There are also suppliers of fishing gears present in local market who would be depending on fishing for their income in some extent. All gears supplier mainly sell the cast net. From the suppliers of fishing gears, the fishermen bought the fishing gears to practice the fishing from river Indus and other water bodies. Fishing gears supplier community based discussion during field survey revealed that most of the customer/fishermen purchased the net once and then used this net after repairing if needed and the customer of supplier practice fishing in tributaries using cast net. Furthermore, the fishing gears supplier not totally dependent on this income.No impacts are expected on other stakeholders involved in fishing activities. 7-4 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments 8 BUDGET The study recommended future monitoring, establishment hatchery for producing fish seed, education and outreach programs. The costs of monitoring programs are covered in the project’s environmental management plans. The cost of implementation of other two mitigation measures is US$ 5.12 million.Fisheries Departments of the concerned districts and PMU will jointly implement these mitigation measures. 8.1 ESTABLISHMENT OF HATCHERY Main objective of the proposed hatchery is to propagate fry in the River Indus and tributaries in the surrounding area while leads the conservation of indigenous species especially for Schizothorax plagiostomus. The hatchery would be constructed in consultation with the Fisheries Department of concerned district. However, project authorities will be the final authority to select the site in consultation with fishery department. The department can use the proposed hatchery for the ova production of fish species. Also, the ova and fry of fish could be supplied for the farmers, interested in fish culture in the area, if any. The fish brooders will be selected from river Indus in the vicinity of project area. The varieties of selected species should be well adapted to the bio-physical conditions of river Indus. Proposed hatchery unit would comprise of indoor nursery tanks (10m x 5m x 0.5m) for fry, rearing tanks (20m x 10m x 1m) for juveniles and stocking tanks (30m x 15 m x 1.5m) for brooders. The hatchery is of small size, comprising of two nursery tanks, two rearing tanks and two stocking tanks. The hatchery complex will include water supply channel, nursery tanks, rearing tanks, stocking tanks and spawneries. After complete digestion of yolk, spawns would be transferred into the nursery tanks. From nursery tanks and rearing tanks fry and fingerlings would be shifted to the Indus River and other water bodies. The stocking tanks would be used to develop brooders for induced breeding. Tributaries like Siglo, Jalkot and Goshali are perennial streams and have sufficient water discharge in addition to rich aquatic biodiversity, which may be able to support the fish seed and further fish fauna by providing suitable breeding, spawning and feeding grounds to the most of the fishes found in the Indus River. The cost estimates for development of fish hatchery is given in Table 8.1. Table 8.1: Cost for Development of Fish Hatchery Total Sr. Activity Quantity Unit PKR/Unit Total (Million No. PKR) A Development Cost A.1 Cost of Land 40 Kanal 1000000 40,000,000 40 A.2 Nursery tank (10m x 5m x 0.5m) 40 Number 500000 20,000,000 20 A.3 Rearing tank (20m x 10m x 1m) 30 Number 500000 15,000,000 15 A.4 Stocking tank (30m x 15 m x 1.5m) 20 Number 500000 10,000,000 10 A.5 Water channel 20 Number 2500000 50,000,000 50 A.6 Fish feed (for 4 years) Lump sum 120,000,000 120 (Leveling, digging, walls, partitions, A.7 Lump sum 100,000,000 100 generators, etc.) Total – A 355,000,000 355 B Contingency (3% of A) 10,650,000 10.65 Grand Total 365,650,000 365.65 Total (US $*) 3,848,947 3.85 * US $ 1= 95 Pak Rupees 8-1 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments 8.2 EDUCATION AND OUTREACH PROGRAMS Education and outreach to address information needs related to fisheries in the downstream area including some training programme for skill enhancement of the fishing community will be taken up under this activity. These programs will be implemented in collaboration of District Fisheries officials. These programs will also address protection of broodstock and spawing grounds and prevement illegal fishing. The costs are given in Table 8.2. Table 8.2: Cost for Education and Outreach Programs Sr. Total (Million Activity Quantity PKR/Unit Total/PKR No. PKR) A Cost for development of improvement fishing A1 Awareness cost lump sum 23,000,000 23.00 A2 Capacity building for improved fishing lump sum 50,000,000 50.00 IEC material development and A3 lump sum 16,000,000 16.00 distribution A4 Techncial support Lump sum 10,00,000 10.00 Administration cost / Management A4 lump sum 18,000,000 18.00 cost Sub Total A 117,000,000 117.00 B Contingency (3% Sub total) 3,510,000 3.51 Grand Total 120, 510, 000 120.51 Total (US $*) 1,268,526 1.23 * US $ 1= 95 Pak Rupees 8.3 IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING During project implementation, the Project Resettlement Office (PRO) will prepare TORs and coordinate with the concerned District Fisheries Department for the development of fish hatcheries. The Livelihood Team will also be involved the planning and implementation of hatcheries. PRO Office will supervise and monitor the implementation and duly report all activities in the monthly progress report. 8-2 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments 9 REFERENCES Ali, S.R., Ahmad, M.Ansari, M.A.S. and Mirza, M. R. 1980. Hydrobiological studies of the Indus River and its tributaries above and below Tarbela Dam. Pakistan J. Sci. Studies 2: 15-30. Ansari, M.A.S., 1976Possible effects of altered water regime of fish and fisheries in Tarbela Lake (Pakistan) FAO (UN). IPFC/76/SYM/19 Panel 11(b): 1-5. Aquatic Ecology, Volume 4 (EMAP) of Detailed Engineering Design Report for Dasu Hydropower Project, February 2013 Cummulative and Induced Impact Assessment, Volume 7 (EMAP) of Detailed Engineering Design Report for Dasu Hydropower Project, March 2013 Environmental Baseline Quality, Volume 6 (EMAP) of Detailed Engineering Design Report for Dasu Hydropower Project, April 2013 IUCN (2011).IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.Version 2011.2. Jayram, K. C., 1982. Aid to the identification of the Siluroid Fishes of India, Burma, Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh. 5. Ariidae and Plotosidae. Rec. Zool. Surv. India, Occ. 37: 41. Mirza M.R., 2006. Note on Fishes of AllaiKhwar, NWFP, Punjab Univ. J. Zool., 21(1-2): 73-75. Mirza, M. R. and Alam, S. K., 2000.Ichthyoregions of Indus River.Science International (Lahore), 12: 143-149. Mirza, M. R., 1975. Freshwater fishes and zoogeography of Pakistan. Bijdragen tot de Dierknnde, 45: 143-180. Mirza, M. R., 1986. Ichthyogeography of Afghanistan and its adjoining areas.Pakistan J. Zool., 18: 331-340. Mirza, M. R., 2001 Mahaseers of Pakistan. Machli Nama, Fish Department Government of Punjab, Pakistan. 10: 5-8. Mirza, M.R., 1994. Geographical distribution of freshwater fishes in Pakistan: A review. Punjab Univ. J. Zool., 9: 93-108. Misra, K.S., 1959.An aid to the identification of the commercial fishes of India and Pakistan.Rec. Indian Mus., 57(1-4):1-320. Perveen, F. and Shah, I.H., 2012.Gonado somatic index in the natural breeding of golden Indus mahasher, Tor putitora macrolepis (Hackel) in Tarbela reservoir, Pakistan.Scientific Research and Impact, 1(4): 55-60. Rafique, M. and Khan, N.-H., 2012.Distribution and status of significant freshwater fishes of Pakistan.Rec. Zool. Surv. Pakistan. 21: 90-95. Rafique, M., 2000.Fish diversity and distribution in Indus River and its drainage system.Pakistan J. Zool., 32: 321-332. Sehgal, K.L., 1988. Ecology and fisheries of mountain streams of the North-Western Himalayas.D.Sc.Thesis, University of Meerut, India. 9-1 Dasu Hydropower Project Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDICES Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-A [1/7] Appendix A: Sample Questionnaires Questionnaire 1: Interview with Identifying Persons A-Interview with Identifying Person Questionnaire # ________ Interview date - - Interviewer Name Father’s Name CNIC # Qualification Resident of Position Contact No. Q#1 Any fishing activity takes place in this area. Yes No If yes, Name of nullah / river Fishing time of the year / season Magnitude of fishing Regular Often Occasional Rare Q#2 Identify person/persons who fish in your area. 1. Name 2. Name Father’s Name Father’s Name Resident of Resident of 3. Name 4. Name Father’s Name Father’s Name Resident of Resident of 5. Name 6. Name Father’s Name Father’s Name Resident of Resident of Q#3 Knowledge about types of fish caught. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Q#4 Do you know about end use of fishing caught in your area? Q#5 Average price at which fish is being sold in the market __________________________ Q#6 Quantity of fish being sold _____Kg/ Month Q#7 How many months do you fish in one year _______Months/ Year Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-A [2/7] B-Village Profile Village Name GPS Coordinates N Distance from river E Total Number of HH of village Total Population of village Households involved in fishing Name of nearest water body 1. Purpose of fishing Domestic consumption Livelihood 2. Rate at which fish is sold (specie wise) 1. _____________ Rs.________/kg (i.e., Mahaseer, Swati, Any other) 2. _____________ Rs.________/kg 3. _____________ Rs.________/kg 4. _____________ Rs.________/kg 3. Source of income other than fishing Agriculture Business Any other_________ 4. Fishing Locations and Season Fishing Season / Time Type of High Flow Season Low Flow Season Both Seasons Fishing Location Fish Fishing Fishing Fishing Months Months Months Time Time Time River Nullah _______________ River + Nullah _______________ 5. Fishing Methods and Quantity of Catch High flow season Low flow season Both seasons (From ______To_____) (From ______To_____) Fishing Gear No. caught Weight of No. Weight of No. caught Weight of catch / Day / Day catch / caught / catch / Day / Day Day Day Cast Net Gill Net Hook & Line Cast Net + Gill Net Gill Net + Hook Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-A [3/7] & line Cast Net + Hook & line 6. Consumption and income of the village Season Weight of Consumed Sold (Kg) Income Income catch/ (Kg) Rs/Month Rs/Season Month High flow season (From ______To_____ ) Low flow season (From ______To_____) Total (Annual) Questionnaire 2: Village Community Group Discussions Questionnaire # ________ Interview date - - Interviewer 1. What do you know about Dasu Hydropower Project? 2. Possible impacts due to Dasu Hydropower Project? During Construction During Operation 3.1 Direct Impacts on Fisheries 3.1.1 Impact on people depending on Fishery- Income Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-A [4/7]  Fishermen, their dependents etc.  Fishermen organizations (cooperatives) 3.1.2 Impact on consumers- People depending on fish as a Food item 3.2 Other Impacts 3.2.1 Suppliers of Fishing gear and equipment 3.2.2 Middleman 3.2.3 Fish Vendors 3.2.4 Development activities undertaken by Fishermen’s Organizations Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-A [5/7] 4. Current Situation of Fishing in the Area 4.1 Present Status of Fish 4.2 Present Skill Level of Fish Catching/ Gear/ Equipment 4.3 Marketing (Fish Supplier, Middleman, Fish Vender) 4.4 Who are the people that buy fish from fish vendor? (Local / Outsider) 5. Role of women in fishing 6. Suggestions 6.1 Stock Enhancement 6.2 Skill Enhancement Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-A [6/7] 6.3 Marketing Questionnaire 3: Interview with Fisherman Questionnaire # ________ Interview date - - Interviewer A – Personal Particulars Name Father’s Name CNIC # Education Resident of Town / City Age Marital Status Contact No. No. of dependents: Wife____________ Children____________ Others ________________ B – Fishing Activities 1. Fishing activity Full Time Part Time Contractor Domestic Domestic or Livelihood Livelihood 2. Fishing location River Nullah _______ Village pond________ 3. Fishing time /season wise Month___________ Hour______________ 4. Fishing gear Cast net Gill net Hook & line Other________ 5. Type of catch / species __________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ 6. Species wise rate of daily catch _____________________________________________ 7. Amount of catch ___________ Kg / day, How many days you fish ___________ / Month and how many months you fish________________________________ /year 8. End use Domestic Commercial 9. If commercial, income generated (Rs.) ____________________________ / day / month Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-A [7/7] 10. Source of income other than fishing Agriculture Business Any other__________ 11. Is there any fishery organization? Yes No If yes, are you member of that organization? Yes No 12. Did your ancestors involve in fishing? Yes No If yes, from how many years? ____________________________________________ 13. Do you catch any other aquatic animals ______________________________________ 14. Has the fish catch been higher, lower or the same over the last 20 years ____________ 15. For domestic consumption, who prepares/cooks fish after catching (you or other family member) 16. Do you fish in the nearby area or outside the area on Indus? ____________________________________________________________________ 17. Who decides / makes decision regarding when fish are needed for food (domestic consumption) or for selling _______________________________________________ C – Any suggestions for improving fisheries in the area _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ D – Family Income Relationship to Head of the Household Village ______________________ # of family Relationship Income Name of HH Head Occupation Remarks members with the HH Rs./ Month Self Wife Father Mother Son Daughter Brother Sister Others Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-B [1/18] Appendix B: Data Collected during Field Survey (16 – 30 May, 2013) B-1: District wise Villages Households Involved in Fishing Total No. of Population HHs Sr. River District Village Name HHs in of Target Involved in No. Bank TargetVillage Village Fishing 1. Kohistan R Siglo 30 240 8 2. Kohistan L Chuchang 104 800 10 3. Kohistan L Goshali 300 1000 100 4. Kohistan L Jalkot 1000 5000 150 5. Kohistan R Kuz Kereo 40 500 25 6. Kohistan L Shilkanabad 500 3000 80 7. Kohistan L Ghaziabad 400 9000 50 8. Kohistan R Patten 800 5000 25 9. Kohistan R Dubair colony 100 400 15 10. Kohistan R Sholgara 70 200 10 11. Shangla R Besham 300 2500 20 12. Shangla R Seror Shang 50 350 7 13. Shangla R Shaga Banda 120 550 10 14. Shangla L Sajbir 100 450 8 15. Shangla L Gim Baara 40 500 8 16. Shangla L Abun 40 600 12 17. Shangla R Daut 350 1000 15 18. Shangla R Carkool 150 350 10 19. Battagram L Thakot colony 80 500 20 20. Battagram L Ghoriyaar 60 500 8 21. Torgher L Sado Khan 360 1000 15 22. Torgher L Zozari Seeri 300 850 20 . B-2: Village wise use of fishing gear by fishermen Fishing Gears Sr. Names of Village Cast Hook & No. Fishermen Gill Net Poison Blast Net Line 1. Ashraf Khan Siglo + + + 2. Salamdar Siglo + + + 3. Faiz-ur-Rahman Siglo + + 4. Jamras Siglo + 5. Sher Khan Siglo + + + 6. Abdul Jabbar Chuchang + 7. Izharul Haq Chuchang + 8. Gulzar Ahmed Chuchang + 9. M. Zarean Khan Chuchang + 10. Amanullah Chuchang + 11. Sher Khan Goshali + + 12. Muhammad Gul Goshali + 13. Fazal-ul-Rehman Goshali + 14. Shafiq-ur-rehman Goshali + 15. Baju Khan Goshali + + 16. Saib Haq Jalkot + + + Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-B [2/18] 17. Ibrahim Jalkot + + + 18. Faiz Malik Jalkot + + 19. Malik Mian Jalkot + + 20. Sadam hussain Jalkot + + 21. Khan Major Kuz Kereo + + + 22. Fazal Elahi Kuz Kereo + + + 23. Raheem Dind Kuz Kereo + 24. Amanullah Kuz Kereo + 25. Alam Zab Khan Kuz Kereo + 26. Siraj ud din Shilkanabad + + 27. Abdul Qayoom Shilkanabad + + 28. Sarfraz Shilkanabad + + + 29. Gul Badshah Shilkanabad + + 30. Khalil ullah Shilkanabad + + 31. Ijaz Ali Ghaziabad + + 32. Riaz Ahmad Ghaziabad + + 33. Zain Ghaziabad + + 34. Muhammad Imtiaz Ghaziabad + + 35. Muhammad Iqbal Ghaziabad + + 36. Ibrahim Patton + + + 37. Sher Muhammad Patton + + + 38. Hayat ullah Patton + + + 39. Bakht Amin Patton + + + 40. Rahim ullah Patton + + + 41. Abdullah Dubair Colony + 42. Khan Muhammad Dubair Colony + + 43. Muhammad Ayaz Dubair Colony + 44. Abdul Bari Dubair Colony + 45. Sher Muhammad Dubair Colony + + 46. Muhammad Duraj Sholgara + + 47. Nabeel khan Sholgara + + 48. Alam sher Sholgara + + 49. Rasool Khan Sholgara + + 50. Abdulrehman Sholgara + + 51. Bakhtezar Shah Basham + 52. Shah Khalid Basham + 53. Saed Ali Shah Basham + + + 54. Waseem Shah Basham + 55. Sadam hussain Basham + 56. Itibar Gul Seror Shang + + 57. Hafeez ullah Seror Shang + + 58. Umer Tesar Seror Shang + + 59. Muhammad Khan Seror Shang + + 60. Gul Nabi Seror Shang + + 61. Shaib Zada Shaga Banda + + 62. Umer Zada Shaga Banda + + 63. Kositana Shaga Banda + + 64. Naseeb Khan Shaga Banda + + 65. Mujib Rahman Shaga Banda + + Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-B [3/18] 66. Saeed ur Rehman Sajbir + + 67. Zafer Khan Sajbir + + 68. Naitullah Sajbir + + 69. Mabat khan Sajbir + + 70. Ikram ullah Sajbir + + 71. Umer Zada Gim Baara + + 72. Dertab Gim Baara + + 73. Hassan Zada Gim Baara + + 74. Sahreen Gim Baara + + 75. Muhammad Sharif Gim Baara + + 76. Sheen Khan Abun + + 77. Muhammad Zaid Abun + + 78. Minhag Abun + + 79. Ameer Zada Abun + + 80. Jaanat Gul Abun + + 81. Abdul Aziz Daut + 82. Salahudin Daut + 83. Nabi Ur Rehman Daut + 84. Muhammad Saleem Daut + 85. Amanullah Daut + 86. Abdul Razaq Carkool + 87. Sangeen Carkool + 88. Inam Ullah Carkool + 89. Fazle Hameed Carkool + 90. Hashim Ali Saeed Carkool + 91. Mujahedin Thakot Colony + 92. Ferhan Thakot Colony + 93. Hanif-Ur-Rehman Thakot Colony + 94. Fazal Muhammad Thakot Colony + 95. Zeralam Khan Thakot Colony + 96. Mustana Khan Ghoriyar + 97. Sakhiullah Ghoriyar + 98. Munawar Khan Ghoriyar + 99. Muhammad Arif Ghoriyar + + 100. Shah Faisal Ghoriyar + 101. Rehman Zada Sado Khan + + 102. Abdul Razaq Sado Khan + + 103. Bakhi alam Sado Khan + 104. Khan Malik Sado Khan + 105. Saminullah Sado Khan + 106. Wajid Ali Zozari Seeri + 107. Noor Nabi Said Zozari Seeri + 108. Shabur Ahmad Zozari Seeri + 109. Said Nazeer Zozari Seeri + 110. Fazal Rabi Zozari Seeri + Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-B [4/18] B-3: Village wise Fish Catch and End Use Fishing Catch End use Sr. Names of Average Village Days/ Months No. Fishermen Catch Domestic Commercial Month /Year (Kg/Day) 1. Ashraf Khan Siglo 4 to 5 20-25 8 Domestic 2. Salamdar Siglo 7 20 08 to Domestic 09 3. Faiz-ur- Siglo 2 12 to 15 07 to Domestic Rahman 08 4. Jamras Siglo 5 to 6 15-20 12 Domestic 5. Sher Khan Siglo 12 to 15 20 8 Domestic 6. Abdul Jabbar Chuchang 8 to 9 20 5 Domestic Commercial 7. Izharul Haq Chuchang 5 Kg 22 5 Domestic Commercial 8. Gulzar Ahmed Chuchang 10 Kg 20 5 Domestic Commercial 9. Muhammad Chuchang 8 Kg 18 5 Domestic Commercial Zarean Khan 10. Amanullah Chuchang 10 Kg 20 3 Domestic Commercial 11. Sher Khan Goshali 2 to 4 Kg 10 6 Domestic 12. Muhammad Goshali 1 to 2 Kg 4 to 5 10 Domestic Gul 13. Fazal-ul- Goshali 4-5 Kg 12 to 15 6 Domestic Rehman 14. Shafiq-ur- Goshali 3-4 Kg 10 4 Domestic rehman 15. Baju Khan Goshali 5-6 Kg 12 to 15 10 Domestic 16. Saib Haq Jalkot 8 to 10 Kg 15 to 20 4 Domestic Commercial 17. Ibrahim Jalkot 5 to 6 20 to 25 5 Domestic Commercial 18. Faiz Malik Jalkot 6 to 7 Kg 10 to 15 4 Domestic Commercial 19. Malik Mian Jalkot 4 to 5 Kg 15 to 20 5 Domestic Commercial 20. Sadam Jalkot 1.5 to 2 Kg 15 to 20 4 Domestic Commercial hussain 21. Khan Major Kuz Kereo 2.5 Kg 10 to 12 6 Domestic 22. Fazal Elahi Kuz Kereo 4 Kg 20 to 25 4 Domestic 23. Raheem Dind Kuz Kereo 4-5 Kg 10 3 Domestic 24. Amanullah Kuz Kereo 1-2 Kg 10 to 12 5 Domestic 25. Alam Zab Kuz Kereo 4 Kg 8 6 Domestic Khan 26. Siraj ud din Shilkanabad 1-2 Kg 10 to 12 8 Domestic 27. Abdul Shilkanabad 5 Kg 7 to 10 4 Domestic Qayoom 28. Sarfraz Shilkanabad 4 to 5 Kg 10 5 Domestic 29. Gul Badshah Shilkanabad 2 8 to 10 4 Domestic 30. Khalil ullah Shilkanabad 1 to 10 Kg 6 to 10 5 Domestic 31. Ijaz Ali Ghaziabad 2-3 Kg 8 to 10 3 Domestic 32. Riaz Ahmad Ghaziabad 2-3 Kg 4 to 5 7 Domestic 33. Zain Ghaziabad 1 to 1.5 5 2 Domestic 34. Muhammad Ghaziabad 1-2 Kg 8 4 Domestic Imtiaz 35. Muhammad Ghaziabad 1-2 Kg 5 to 8 3 Domestic Iqbal Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-B [5/18] 36. Ibrahim Patton 10 Kg 20 to 25 9 Domestic Commercial 37. Sher Patton 4 to 5 Kg 30 9 Domestic Commercial Muhammad 38. Hayat ullah Patton 6 Kg 30 9 Domestic Commercial 39. Bakht Amin Patton 6 to 8 Kg 30 9 Domestic Commercial 40. Rahim ullah Patton 7 to 10 Kg 15 to 20 9 Domestic Commercial 41. Abdullah Dubair 2 to 3 Kg 30 3 Domestic Colony 42. Khan Dubair 9 to 10 Kg 30 5 Domestic Commercial Muhammad Colony 43. Muhammad Dubair 4 to 5 Kg 20 to 25 2 Domestic Commercial Ayaz Colony 44. Abdul Bari Dubair 4 to 5 Kg 25 to 26 4 Domestic Commercial Colony 45. Sher Dubair 3 to 4 Kg 15 to 20 2 Domestic Commercial Muhammad Colony 46. Muhammad Sholgara 4 10 3 Domestic Duraj 47. Nabeel khan Sholgara 2 to 3 Kg 15 to 20 4 to 5 Domestic 48. Alam sher Sholgara 5 to 6 Kg 20 to 25 3 Domestic 49. Rasool Khan Sholgara 1 to 2 Kg 12 to 15 5 Domestic 50. Abdulrehman Sholgara 2 to 4 Kg 8 to 10 4 Domestic 51. Bakhtezar Basham 2 to 3 Kg 10 to 12 3 Domestic Shah 52. Shah Khalid Basham 3 Kg 15 4 Domestic 53. Saed Ali Shah Basham 2 Kg 10 7 Domestic 54. Waseem Basham 2 to 3 3 to 5 6 Domestic Shah 55. Sadam Basham 1 to 1.5 Kg 8 to 10 4 Domestic hussain 56. Itibar Gul Seror Shang 4 Kg 20 4 Domestic 57. Hafeez ullah Seror Shang 5 Kg 21 3 Domestic 58. Umer Tesar Seror Shang 7-8 Kg 24 4 Domestic 59. Muhammad Seror Shang 5-7 Kg 20 5 Domestic Khan 60. Gul Nabi Seror Shang 7 to 8 Kg 20 4 Domestic 61. Shaib Zada Shaga Banda 3 to 4 Kg 20 3 Domestic 62. Umer Zada Shaga Banda 6-7 Kg 25 5 Domestic 63. Kositana Shaga Banda 4 Kg 25 5 Domestic 64. Naseeb Khan Shaga Banda 5-6 Kg 25 3 Domestic 65. Mujib Rahman Shaga Banda 3-4 Kg 22 4 Domestic 66. Saeed ur Sajbir 4-5 Kg 20-22 2 Domestic Rehman 67. Zafer Khan Sajbir 2-3 Kg 25 4 Domestic 68. Naitullah Sajbir 5-6 Kg 22-25 4 Domestic 69. Mabat khan Sajbir 5 30 3 Domestic 70. Ikram ullah Sajbir 7-8 Kg 20 4 Domestic 71. Umer Zada Gim Baara 7-8 Kg 20 4 Domestic 72. Dertab Gim Baara 2-3 Kg 20 4 Domestic 73. Hassan Zada Gim Baara 2-3 Kg 30 5 Domestic 74. Sahreen Gim Baara 2-3 Kg 10 to 15 4 Domestic Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-B [6/18] 75. Muhammad Gim Baara 3 15 4 Domestic Sharif 76. Sheen Khan Abun 2-4 Kg 25 3 Domestic 77. Muhammad Abun 4-5Kg 20 4 Domestic Zaid 78. Minhag Abun 3-4Kg 25 4 Domestic 79. Ameer Zada Abun 1-2 Kg 10 3 Domestic 80. Jaanat Gul Abun 5-6 Kg 30 5 Domestic 81. Abdul Aziz Daut 5-6 Kg 25 6 Domestic commercial 82. Salahudin Daut 2-3 Kg 20 2 Domestic Commercial 83. Nabi Ur Daut 3-4 Kg 30 2 Domestic Commercial Rehman 84. Muhammad Daut 7-8 Kg 25 3 Domestic Saleem 85. Amanullah Daut 3 Kg 30 3 Domestic 86. Abdul Razaq Carkool 1-2 Kg 26 3 Domestic 87. Sangeen Carkool 4-5 Kg 30 2 Domestic 88. Inam Ullah Carkool 2-3 Kg 28 2 Domestic 89. Fazle Carkool 3-4 Kg 25 3 Domestic Hameed 90. Hashim Ali Carkool 2-3 Kg 25 3 Domestic Saeed 91. Mujahedin Thakot 5 to 6 Kg 25 2 Domestic commercial Colony 92. Ferhan Thakot 4-5 Kg 25-30 3 Domestic commercial Colony 93. Hanif-Ur- Thakot 4-5 Kg 20 2 Domestic Commercial Rehman Colony 94. Fazal Thakot 5-6 Kg 25 2 Domestic Commercial Muhammad Colony 95. Zeralam Khan Thakot 3-4 Kg 25 2 Domestic Commercial Colony 96. Mustana Khan Ghoriyar 1-2 Kg 15-20 3 Domestic 97. Sakhiullah Ghoriyar 1-2 Kg 10 to 15 2 Domestic 98. Munawar Ghoriyar 1-2 Kg 5 to 10 2 Domestic Khan 99. Muhammad Ghoriyar 2 to 3 Kg 15 to 20 2 Domestic Arif 100. Shah Faisal Ghoriyar 0.5 to 1 Kg 10 to 12 1 Domestic 101. Rehman Zada Sado Khan 2 to 3 Kg 10 to 15 2 Domestic 102. Abdul Razaq Sado Khan 2 to 3 Kg 15 to 20 2 Domestic 103. Bakhi alam Sado Khan 2 to 3 Kg 10 to 15 4 Domestic 104. Khan Malik Sado Khan 1 to 2 Kg 10 to 15 2 Domestic 105. Saminullah Sado Khan 1 to 2 Kg 15 to 18 3 Domestic 106. Wajid Ali Zozari Seeri 2 to 3 Kg 10 5 Domestic 107. Noor Nabi Zozari Seeri 1 to 2 Kg 15 to 20 5 Domestic Said 108. Shabur Zozari Seeri 1 to 2 Kg 15 2 Domestic Ahmad 109. Said Nazeer Zozari Seeri 2 to 4 Kg 10 to 15 3 Domestic 110. Fazal Rabi Zozari Seeri 1 to 1.5 Kg 5 3 Domestic Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-B [7/18] B-4: Fishermen’s Fishing Catch Localities Fishing Locations Sr. No. Names of Fishermen Village River Nullah 1. Ashraf Khan Siglo Indus Siglo 2. Salamdar Siglo Indus 3. Faiz-ur-Rahman Siglo Indus 4. Jamras Siglo Indus 5. Sher Khan Siglo Indus 6. Abdul Jabbar Chuchang Indus 7. Izharul Haq Chuchang Indus 8. Gulzar Ahmed Chuchang Indus 9. Muhammad Zarean Khan Chuchang Indus 10. Amanullah Chuchang Indus 11. Sher Khan Goshali Goshali 12. Muhammad Gul Goshali 13. Fazal-ul-Rehman Goshali 14. Shafiq-ur-rehman Goshali 15. Baju Khan Goshali 16. Saib Haq Jalkot Indus Jalkot 17. Ibrahim Jalkot Indus 18. Faiz Malik Jalkot Indus 19. Malik Mian Jalkot Indus 20. Sadam hussain Jalkot Indus 21. Khan Major Kuz Kereo Indus Kuz Kereo 22. Fazal Elahi Kuz Kereo Indus 23. Raheem Dind Kuz Kereo Indus 24. Amanullah Kuz Kereo Indus 25. Alam Zab Khan Kuz Kereo Indus 26. Siraj ud din Shilkanabad Indus 27. Abdul Qayoom Shilkanabad Indus 28. Sarfraz Shilkanabad Inuds Shilkan Abad 29. Gul Badshah Shilkanabad Indus 30. Khalil ullah Shilkanabad Indus 31. Ijaz Ali Ghaziabad Indus Ghazi Aabad 32. Riaz Ahmad Ghaziabad Indus 33. Zain Ghaziabad Indus 34. Muhammad Imtiaz Ghaziabad Inuds 35. Muhammad Iqbal Ghaziabad Indus 36. Ibrahim Patton Indus Pattan 37. Sher Muhammad Patton Indus 38. Hayat ullah Patton Indus 39. Bakht Amin Patton Indus 40. Rahim ullah Patton Indus 41. Abdullah Dubair Colony Indus 42. Khan Muhammad Dubair Colony Indus 43. Muhammad Ayaz Dubair Colony Indus 44. Abdul Bari Dubair Colony Indus 45. Sher Muhammad Dubair Colony Indus 46. Muhammad Duraj Sholgara Indus Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-B [8/18] 47. Nabeel khan Sholgara Indus 48. Alam sher Sholgara Indus 49. Rasool Khan Sholgara Indus 50. Abdulrehman Sholgara indus 51. Bakhtezar Shah Basham Indus 52. Shah Khalid Basham Indus 53. Saed Ali Shah Basham Indus Khan Khawar 54. Waseem Shah Basham Indus 55. Sadam hussain Basham Indus 56. Itibar Gul Seror Shang Indus 57. Hafeez ullah Seror Shang Indus 58. Umer Tesar Seror Shang Indus 59. Muhammad Khan Seror Shang indus 60. Gul Nabi Seror Shang Indus 61. Shaib Zada Shaga Banda Indus 62. Umer Zada Shaga Banda Indus 63. Kositana Shaga Banda Indus 64. Naseeb Khan Shaga Banda Indus 65. Mujib Rahman Shaga Banda indus 66. Saeed ur Rehman Sajbir Indus 67. Zafer Khan Sajbir Indus 68. Naitullah Sajbir Indus 69. Mabat khan Sajbir Indus 70. Ikram ullah Sajbir Indus 71. Umer Zada Gim Baara Indus 72. Dertab Gim Baara Indus 73. Hassan Zada Gim Baara Indus 74. Sahreen Gim Baara Indus 75. Muhammad Sharif Gim Baara Indus 76. Sheen Khan Abun Indus 77. Muhammad Zaid Abun Indus 78. Minhag Abun Indus 79. Ameer Zada Abun Indus 80. Jaanat Gul Abun Indus 81. Abdul Aziz Daut Indus 82. Salahudin Daut Indus 83. Nabi Ur Rehman Daut Indus 84. Muhammad Saleem Daut Indus 85. Amanullah Daut Indus 86. Abdul Razaq Carkool Indus 87. Sangeen Carkool Indus 88. Inam Ullah Carkool Indus 89. Fazle Hameed Carkool Indus 90. Hashim Ali Saeed Carkool Indus 91. Mujahedin Thakot Colony Indus 92. Ferhan Thakot Colony Indus 93. Hanif-Ur-Rehman Thakot Colony Indus 94. Fazal Muhammad Thakot Colony Indus 95. Zeralam Khan Thakot Colony Indus Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-B [9/18] 96. Mustana Khan Ghoriyar Indus 97. Sakhiullah Ghoriyar Indus 98. Munawar Khan Ghoriyar Indus 99. Muhammad Arif Ghoriyar Indus 100. Shah Faisal Ghoriyar Indus 101. Rehman Zada Sado Khan Indus 102. Abdul Razaq Sado Khan Indus 103. Bakhi alam Sado Khan Indus 104. Khan Malik Sado Khan Indus 105. Saminullah Sado Khan Indus 106. Wajid Ali Zozari Seeri Indus 107. Noor Nabi Said Zozari Seeri Indus 108. Shabur Ahmad Zozari Seeri Indus 109. Said Nazeer Zozari Seeri Indus 110. Fazal Rabi Zozari Seeri Indus B-5: Average Annual Income of Fishermen End Use of Catched Fish Total Total Income of Income of Sr. No. Name Village HHs Domestic Commercial HHs (Rs./Month) (Rs./Year) 1. Ashraf Khan Siglo Domestic 8000 96000 2. Salamdar Siglo Domestic 5000 60000 Faiz-ur- 3. Siglo Domestic 15600 Rahman 187200 4. Jamras Siglo Domestic 10000 120000 5. Sher Khan Siglo Domestic 10000 120000 6. Abdul Jabbar Chuchang Domestic commercial 10000 120000 7. Izharul Haq Chuchang Domestic commercial 8000 96000 Gulzar 8. Chuchang Domestic commercial 12000 Ahmed 144000 Muhammad 9. Chuchang Domestic commercial 10000 Zarean Khan 120000 10. Amanullah Chuchang Domestic commercial 8000 96000 11. Sher Khan Goshali Domestic 7000 84000 Muhammad 12. Goshali Domestic 8000 Gul 96000 Fazal-ul- 13. Goshali Domestic 7000 Rehman 84000 Shafiq-ur- 14. Goshali Domestic 9000 rehman 108000 15. Baju Khan Goshali Domestic 12000 144000 16. Saib Haq Jalkot Domestic Commercial 20000 240000 17. Ibrahim Jalkot Domestic Commercial 15000 180000 18. Faiz Malik Jalkot Domestic Commercial 15000 180000 19. Malik Mian Jalkot Domestic Commercial 12000 144000 Sadam 20. Jalkot Domestic Commercial 5000 hussain 60000 21. Khan Major Kuz Kereo Domestic 6000 72000 22. Fazal Elahi Kuz Kereo Domestic 9000 108000 23. Raheem Dind Kuz Kereo Domestic 7000 84000 24. Amanullah Kuz Kereo Domestic 10000 120000 Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-B [10/18] Alam Zab 25. Kuz Kereo Domestic 8000 Khan 96000 26. Siraj ud din Shilkanabad Domestic 7000 84000 Abdul 27. Shilkanabad Domestic 10000 Qayoom 120000 28. Sarfraz Shilkanabad Domestic 8000 96000 29. Gul Badshah Shilkanabad Domestic 12000 144000 30. Khalil ullah Shilkanabad Domestic 15000 180000 31. Ijaz Ali Ghaziabad Domestic 10000 120000 32. Riaz Ahmad Ghaziabad Domestic 7000 84000 33. Zain Ghaziabad Domestic 13000 156000 Muhammad 34. Ghaziabad Domestic 15000 Imtiaz 180000 Muhammad 35. Ghaziabad Domestic 8000 Iqbal 96000 36. Ibrahim Patton Domestic Commercial 20000 240000 Sher 37. Patton Domestic Commercial 12000 Muhammad 144000 38. Hayat ullah Patton Domestic Commercial 15000 180000 39. Bakht Amin Patton Domestic Commercial 12000 144000 40. Rahim ullah Patton Domestic Commercial 10000 120000 Dubair 41. Abdullah Domestic 12000 Colony 144000 Khan Dubair 42. Domestic Commercial 11000 Muhammad Colony 132000 Muhammad Dubair 43. Domestic Commercial 15000 Ayaz Colony 180000 Dubair 44. Abdul Bari Domestic commercial 8000 Colony 96000 Sher Dubair 45. Domestic Commercial 20000 Muhammad Colony 240000 Muhammad 46. Sholgara Domestic 15000 Duraj 180000 47. Nabeel khan Sholgara Domestic 12000 144000 48. Alam sher Sholgara Domestic 8000 96000 49. Rasool Khan Sholgara Domestic 12000 144000 50. Abdulrehman Sholgara Domestic 8000 96000 Bakhtezar 51. Basham Domestic 10000 Shah 120000 52. Shah Khalid Basham Domestic 12000 144000 Saed Ali 53. Basham Domestic 15000 Shah 180000 Waseem 54. Basham Domestic 13000 Shah 156000 Sadam 55. Basham Domestic 15000 hussain 180000 56. Itibar Gul Seror Shang Domestic 25000 300000 57. Hafeez ullah Seror Shang Domestic 20000 240000 58. Umer Tesar Seror Shang Domestic 10000 120000 Muhammad 59. Seror Shang Domestic 20000 Khan 240000 60. Gul Nabi Seror Shang Domestic 12000 144000 Shaga 61. Shaib Zada Domestic 20000 Banda 240000 Shaga 62. Umer Zada Domestic 15000 Banda 180000 Shaga 63. Kositana Domestic 12000 Banda 144000 Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-B [11/18] Shaga 64. Naseeb Khan Domestic 18000 Banda 216000 Mujib Shaga 65. Domestic 9000 Rahman Banda 108000 Saeed ur 66. Sajbir Domestic 20000 Rehman 240000 67. Zafer Khan Sajbir Domestic 20000 240000 68. Naitullah Sajbir Domestic 15000 180000 69. Mabat khan Sajbir Domestic 20000 240000 70. Ikram ullah Sajbir Domestic 8000 96000 71. Umer Zada Gim Baara Domestic 12000 144000 72. Dertab Gim Baara Domestic 8000 96000 73. Hassan Zada Gim Baara Domestic 12000 144000 74. Sahreen Gim Baara Domestic 15000 180000 Muhammad 75. Gim Baara Domestic 8000 Sharif 96000 76. Sheen Khan Abun Domestic 10000 120000 Muhammad 77. Abun Domestic 15000 Zaid 180000 78. Minhag Abun Domestic 6000 72000 79. Ameer Zada Abun Domestic 5000 60000 80. Jaanat Gul Abun Domestic 15000 180000 81. Abdul Aziz Daut Domestic Commercial 20000 240000 82. Salahudin Daut Domestic Commercial 8000 96000 Nabi Ur 83. Daut Domestic Commercial 10000 Rehman 120000 Muhammad 84. Daut Domestic 20000 Saleem 240000 85. Amanullah Daut Domestic 15000 180000 86. Abdul Razaq Carkool Domestic 6000 72000 87. Sangeen Carkool Domestic 8000 96000 88. Inam Ullah Carkool Domestic 8000 96000 Fazle 89. Carkool Domestic 12000 Hameed 144000 Hashim Ali 90. Carkool Domestic 12000 Saeed 144000 Thakot 91. Mujahedin Domestic Commercial 20000 Colony 240000 Thakot 92. Ferhan Domestic Commercial 6000 Colony 72000 Hanif-Ur- Thakot 93. Domestic commercial 12000 Rehman Colony 144000 Fazal Thakot 94. Domestic commercial 10000 Muhammad Colony 120000 Thakot 95. Zeralam Khan Domestic commercial 6000 Colony 72000 Mustana 96. Ghoriyar Domestic 10000 Khan 120000 97. Sakhiullah Ghoriyar Domestic 6500 78000 Munawar 98. Ghoriyar Domestic 15000 Khan 180000 Muhammad 99. Ghoriyar Domestic 8000 Arif 96000 100. Shah Faisal Ghoriyar Domestic 7500 90000 Rehman 101. Sado Khan Domestic 7000 Zada 84000 102. Abdul Razaq Sado Khan Domestic 6000 72000 103. Bakhi alam Sado Khan Domestic 6000 72000 Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-B [12/18] 104. Khan Malik Sado Khan Domestic 7000 84000 105. Saminullah Sado Khan Domestic 7000 84000 106. Wajid Ali Zozari Seeri Domestic 7000 84000 Noor Nabi 107. Zozari Seeri Domestic 15000 Said 180000 Shabur 108. Zozari Seeri Domestic 10000 Ahmad 120000 109. Said Nazeer Zozari Seeri Domestic 8000 96000 110. Fazal Rabi Zozari Seeri Domestic 12000 144000 Total Average Income of the Household Rs. 137,629 Total Average Income of the 27 Commercial Fishermen Household Rs. 146,667 Total Average Income of the 83 Domestic Fishermen Hosehold Rs. 134,689 Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-B [13/18] B-6: Fishermen’s Annual Income (Inhabitants of Different Villages) Fish catch Fishermen Income (PKR) Sr. No. Name Village Average Total HHs HHs Income Percentage of Days/ Months/ Catch Income from HHs’ Income Month Year (Kg/Day) /Year Fishing/Year from Fishing 1. Abdul Jabbar Chuchang 8 to 9 20 5 120000 80000 66.67 2. Izharul Haq Chuchang 5 Kg 22 5 96000 55000 57.29 3. Gulzar Ahmed Chuchang 10 Kg 20 5 144000 100000 69.44 4. Muhammad Zarean Chuchang 8 Kg 18 5 120000 45000 37.50 5. Amanullah Chuchang 10 Kg 20 3 96000 30000 31.25 6. Saib Haq Jalkot 8 to 10 Kg 15 to 20 4 240000 56000 23.33 7. Ibrahim Jalkot 5 to 6 20 to 25 5 180000 56250 31.25 8. Faiz Malik Jalkot 6 to 7 Kg 10 to 15 4 180000 30000 16.67 9. Malik Mian Jalkot 4 to 5 Kg 15 to 20 5 144000 26250 18.23 10. Sadam hussain Jalkot 1.5 to 2 Kg 15 to 20 4 60000 10500 17.50 11. Ibrahim Patton 10 Kg 20 to 25 9 240000 202500 84.38 12. Sher Muhammad Patton 4 to 5 Kg 30 9 144000 135000 93.75 13. Hayat ullah Patton 6 Kg 30 9 180000 162000 90.00 14. Bakht Amin Patton 6 to 8 Kg 30 9 144000 135000 93.75 15. Rahim ullah Patton 7 to 10 Kg 15 to 20 9 120000 78750 65.63 16 Khan Muhammad Dubair Colony 9 to 10 Kg 30 5 132000 120000 90.91 17. Muhammad Ayaz Dubair Colony 4 to 5 Kg 20 to 25 2 180000 27000 15.00 18. Abdul Bari Dubair Colony 4 to 5 Kg 25 to 26 4 96000 40800 42.50 19. Sher Muhammad Dubair Colony 3 to 4 Kg 15 to 20 2 240000 8750 3.65 20. Abdul Aziz Daut 5-6 Kg 25 6 240000 45000 18.75 21. Salahudin Daut 2-3 Kg 20 2 96000 8000 8.33 22. Nabi Ur Rehman Daut 3-4 Kg 30 2 120000 18000 15.00 Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-B [14/18] 23. Mujahedin Thakot Colony 5 to 6 Kg 25 2 240000 30000 12.50 24. Ferhan Thakot Colony 4-5 Kg 25-30 3 72000 33000 45.83 25. Hanif-Ur-Rehman Thakot Colony 4-5 Kg 20 2 144000 18000 12.50 26. Fazal Muhammad Thakot Colony 5-6 Kg 25 2 120000 17500 14.58 27. Zeralam Khan Thakot Colony 3-4 Kg 25 2 72000 15000 20.83 Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-B [15/18] B-7: Education and Marital Status of Fishermen Sr. Age Marital Village Name Father Name CNIC No. Education No. (years) Status 1. Siglo Ashraf Khan Salamdar 13401-9144306 Primary 23 Married 2. Siglo Salamdar Zubal 13401-9522375-5 - 60 Married 3. Siglo Faiz-ur-Rahman Majap 13401-4203839-7 - 35 Married 4. Siglo Jamras Bulia 13403-6077941-7 - 60 Married 5. Siglo Sher Khan Salamdar 13401-9521730-1 Middle 29 Married 6. Chuchang Abdul Jabbar Sahibul Haq 13401-0915484-3 Middle 21 Unmarried 7. Chuchang Izharul Haq Wakeel shah 13401-5710556-9 Middle 23 Unmarried 8. Chuchang Gulzar Ahmed Fameer 13401-8344459-5 Middle 19 Unmarried 9. Chuchang Muhammad Fameer 13401-4906240-9 Primary 25 Unmarried Zarean Khan 10. Chuchang Amanullah Bijal Khan 13401-6776972-9 Middle 28 Married 11. Goshali Sher Khan Hijab Khan 13401-3871948-3 Matric 26 Married 12. Goshali Muhammad Gul Israr din - 40 Married 13. Goshali Fazal-ul- Baju Khan 13401-6872798-1 - 21 Married Rehman 14. Goshali Shafiq-ur- Qaiser Khan 13401-5507032-9 Matric 23 Unmarried rehman 15. Goshali Baju Khan Raghala - 50 Married 16. Jalkot Saib Haq Jamroz Khan 13401-7350380-7 Primary 25 Married 17. Jalkot Ibrahim Mumtaz khan - Middle 32 Married 18. Jalkot Faiz Malik Noshawan - Matric 24 Married 19. Jalkot Malik Mian Waliat Khan 13401-1137256-1 Primary 51 Married Noor 20. Jalkot Sadam hussain Shukrat Khan - Primary 17 Unmarried 21. Kuz Kereo Khan Major Gul Muhammad 13403-3246017-3 - 32 Married 22. Kuz Kereo Fazal Elahi Haji Darlo 13403-4095527-1 Primary 34 Married 23. Kuz Kereo Raheem Dind Idrees 13403-9508648-1 Matric 28 Married 24. Kuz Kereo Amanullah Haji Jundin 13403-1318217-3 Primary 25 Married 25. Kuz Kereo Alam Zab Khan Malik Jan 13403-4703562-9 Matric 24 Married 26. Shilkanaba Siraj ud din Nasang 13402-1156820-7 - 68 Married d 27. Shilkanaba Abdul Qayoom Haji Qadam 13402-1350098-5 - 59 Married d Khan 28. Shilkanaba Sarfraz Awal Khan 13402-3957420-5 FA 26 Married d 29. Shilkanaba Gul Badshah Najum Khan 13402-1157020-1 Primary 45 Married d 30. Shilkanaba Khalil ullah Siraj din 13402-4440587-9 FA 22 Married d 31. Ghaziabad Ijaz Ali Subbdar Khan 13402-2218222-5 M.A 31 Married 32. Ghaziabad Riaz Ahmad Qazi Malook 13402-2537314-2 B.A 30 Married 33. Ghaziabad Zain Azal Khan 13402-5251309-7 F.Sc 18 Married 34. Ghaziabad Muhammad Faiz Malook 13402-1153045-7 B.A 35 Married Imtiaz 35. Ghaziabad Muhammad Abdul Rauf 13402-1229824-2 B.A 41 Married Iqbal 36. Patton Ibrahim Muhammad Jaa 134039-575772-9 Matric 46 Married Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-B [16/18] 37. Patton Sher Muhmmad Jan 13403-084755-7 Primary 27 Married Muhammad 38. Patton Hayat ullah Hakeem Khan 13403-9418653-1 Middle 28 Married 39. Patton Bakht Amin Noor-ul-Huda 13403-5734723-3 Matric 36 Married 40. Patton Rahim ullah Sabit shah - Matric 21 Married 41. Dubair Abdullah Guldat - Middle 38 Married Colony 42. Dubair Khan Shah Nawaz 13403-3332634-3 - 30 Married Colony Muhammad 43. Dubair Muhammad Bajus - Middle 40 Married Colony Ayaz 44. Dubair Abdul Bari Bahida Khan - Middle 53 Married Colony 45. Dubair Sher Kiki - Primary 24 Married Colony Muhammad 46. Sholgara Muhammad Sher Afzal 13403-1532773-3 Middle 25 Married Duraj 47. Sholgara Nabeel khan shah ali 13402-1434321-2 - 32 Married 48. Sholgara Alam sher Jamrus 13403-1532554-2 Primary 40 Married 49. Sholgara Rasool Khan Mir Afzal 13403-0152324-1 Primary 31 Married 50. Sholgara Abdulrehman Bashir ahmed 13405-1545132-1 - 38 Married 51. Basham Bakhtezar Shah Gul Wazar 15502-3040118-3 Matric 39 Married 52. Basham Shah Khalid Noor Hani Gul 15501-2274662-5 Middle 30 Unmarried 53. Basham Saed Ali Shah Sir baz 15502-9901970-5 - 37 Married 54. Basham Waseem Shah Mamtareen 15502-7447951-9 - 26 Unmarried Shah 55. Basham Sadam hussain Mohsin shah 15502-5831788-5 F.Sc 20 Unmarried 56. Seror Itibar Gul Subat Khan 15502-2005166-7 - 54 Married Shang 57. Seror Hafeez ullah Gul Nabi 15502-4087128-3 - 27 Married Shang 58. Seror Umer Tesar Gelender Khan 15502-3716976-3 - 30 Married Shang 59. Seror Muhammad Mahmmad 15502-3716976-3 - 49 Married Shang Khan 60. Seror Gul Nabi Subat Khan 15502-2005770-3 - 48 Married Shang 61. Shaga Shaib Zada Gul Sakeen 15502-4859351-3 - 35 Married Banda 62. Shaga Umer Zada Abdul Hakeem 42201-2473162-7 - 39 Married Banda 63. Shaga Kositana Abdul Hakeem 15501-3477557-9 - 40 Married Banda 64. Shaga Naseeb Khan Shareef Khan 15502-9207999-7 - 37 Married Banda 65. Shaga Mujib Rahman Badar Munir 15502-1540345-3 - 26 Married Banda 66. Sajbir Saeed ur Zarat Wali 13201-9644020-9 Middle 50 Married Rehman 67. Sajbir Zafer Khan Ali Asghar 13201-3726857-9 Matric 42 Married 68. Sajbir Naitullah Kabir Khan 13201-9216983-3 Primary 25 Married 69. Sajbir Mabat khan Fakeer sher 13201-1834960-9 - 51 Married 70. Sajbir Ikram ullah Khan Zada 13201-6563666-7 - 25 Married Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-B [17/18] 71. Gim Baara Umer Zada Gens 13201-1837956-7 - 44 Married 72. Gim Baara Dertab Glacier 13202-6030785-3 - 49 Married 73. Gim Baara Hassan Zada Gul Zada 13201-1817459-7 - 32 Married 74. Gim Baara Sahreen Afsar 13201-4202775-5 - 48 Married 75. Gim Baara Muhammad Safdar 13201-0920624-3 - 45 Married Sharif 76. Abun Sheen Khan Toor Khan 13201-9993388-9 - 45 Married 77. Abun Muhammad Zaid Ahmed Jan 13202-0744548-7 - 42 Married 78. Abun Minhag Abdul Rehman 13202-0744057-5 Primary 35 Married 79. Abun Ameer Zada Sohbat 13201-1833729-1 - 72 Married 80. Abun Jaanat Gul Gul Muhammad 13201-7338342-7 - 22 Married 81. Daut Abdul Aziz Majeed 15503-1218539-1 - 45 Married 82. Daut Salahudin Badar Gul 13202-0729917-5 - 27 Married 83. Daut Nabi Ur Muhammad 15503-8228169-3 - 40 Married Rehman-Ur- Imran Rehman 84. Daut Muhammad Baramand 15503-2427921-1 Primary 22 Married Saleem 85. Daut Amanullah Himaash Khan 15503-2104117-9 - 38 Unmarried 86. Carkool Abdul Razaq Syed Zareen 15503-6961600-3 Primary 36 Married 87. Carkool Sangeen Mian Sardar 15503-4680276-3 - 26 Married 88. Carkool Inam Ullah Abdul Jalil 15503-9573478-1 Middle 37 Married 89. Carkool Fazle Hameed Saeed Hubab 15503-5704730-7 Primary 46 Married 90. Carkool Hashim Ali Sahib Saeed 15503-7331136-1 Middle 29 Married Saeed 91. Thakot Mujahedin Qader Gul 13202-8291354 Middle 44 Married Colony 92. Thakot Ferhan Hamaash Gul 13202-1068964-9 - 19 Married Colony 93. Thakot Hanif-Ur- Samer Gul 13202-0781449-1 - 42 Unmarried Colony Rehman 94. Thakot Fazal Musharaf Gul 13202-6842559-7 Primary 23 Married Colony Muhammad 95. Thakot Zeralam Khan Eeser Gul 13202-0776020-3 - 58 Married Colony 96. Ghoriyar Mustana Khan Yousaf 42401-2457984-5 - 44 Married 97. Ghoriyar Sakhiullah Zar Gul 13202-0874650-9 - 52 Married 98. Ghoriyar Munawar Khan Zar Muhammad 13202-0719191-5 - 61 Married Khan 99. Ghoriyar Muhammad Arif Zar Muhammad 13202-0735199-5 - 36 Married 100. Ghoriyar Shah Faisal Nabeel Khan 13202-0735211-4 - 32 Married 101. Sado Khan Rehman Zada Mobeen 13502-2516622-5 Middle 22 Married 102. Sado Khan Abdul Razaq Jankase Khan 13502-3797623-1 - 21 Married 103. Sado Khan Bakhi alam Jan Khatab 13504-6390723-3 - 20 Married 104. Sado Khan Khan Malik Malik Waseem 13504-7490223-1 Middle 25 Married 105. Sado Khan Saminullah Wajullah 13501-3552182-1 - 36 Married 106. Zozari Wajid Ali Saif 13504-2244743-1 Primary 50 Married Seeri 107. Zozari Noor Nabi Said Muhammad 13601-0488503-5 FA 18 Married Seeri Akram 108. Zozari Shabur Ahmad Fazal Zamar 13504-9131659-3 F.Sc 18 Unmarried Seeri Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-B [18/18] 109. Zozari Said Nazeer Aijaib Said 42401-7659346-7 - 24 Married Seeri 110. Zozari Fazal Rabi Khetab 42101-1230871-5 Matric 33 Married Seeri Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-C [1/3] Appendix C: List of Consulted Fishermen Sr. No. Village Name Father Name CNIC No. 1. Siglo Ashraf Khan Salamdar 13401-9144306-5 2. Siglo Salamdar Zubal 13401-9522375-5 3. Siglo Faiz-ur-Rahman Majap 13401-4203839-7 4. Siglo Jamras Bulia 13403-6077941-7 5. Siglo Sher Khan Salamdar 13401-9521730-1 6. Chuchang Abdul Jabbar Sahibul Haq 13401-0915484-3 7. Chuchang Izharul Haq Wakeel shah 13401-5710556-9 8. Chuchang Gulzar Ahmed Fameer 13401-8344459-5 9. Chuchang Muhammad Zarean Khan Fameer 13401-4906240-9 10. Chuchang Amanullah Bijal Khan 13401-6776972-9 11. Goshali Sher Khan Hijab Khan 13401-3871948-3 12. Goshali Muhammad Gul Israr din 13. Goshali Fazal-ul-Rehman Baju Khan 13401-6872798-1 14. Goshali Shafiq-ur-rehman Qaiser Khan 13401-5507032-9 15. Goshali Baju Khan Raghala 16. Jalkot Saib Haq Jamroz Khan 13401-7350380-7 17. Jalkot Ibrahim Mumtaz khan - 18. Jalkot Faiz Malik Noshawan - 19. Jalkot Malik Mian Waliat Khan Noor 13401-1137256-1 20. Jalkot Sadam hussain Shukrat Khan - 21. Kuz Kereo Khan Major Gul Muhammad 13403-3246017-3 22. Kuz Kereo Fazal Elahi Haji Darlo 13403-4095527-1 23. Kuz Kereo Raheem Dind Idrees 13403-9508648-1 24. Kuz Kereo Amanullah Haji Jundin 13403-1318217-3 25. Kuz Kereo Alam Zab Khan Malik Jan 13403-4703562-9 26. Shilkanabad Siraj ud din Nasang 13402-1156820-7 27. Shilkanabad Abdul Qayoom Haji Qadam Khan 13402-1350098-5 28. Shilkanabad Sarfraz Awal Khan 13402-3957420-5 29. Shilkanabad Gul Badshah Najum Khan 13402-1157020-1 30. Shilkanabad Khalil ullah Siraj din 13402-4440587-9 31. Ghaziabad Ijaz Ali Subbdar Khan 13402-2218222-5 32. Ghaziabad Riaz Ahmad Qazi Malook 13402-2537314-2 33. Ghaziabad Zain Azal Khan 13402-5251309-7 34. Ghaziabad Muhammad Imtiaz Faiz Malook 13402-1153045-7 35. Ghaziabad Muhammad Iqbal Abdul Rauf 13402-1229824-2 36. Patton Ibrahim Muhammad Jaa 134039-575772-9 37. Patton Sher Muhammad Muhmmad Jan 13403-084755-7 38. Patton Hayat ullah Hakeem Khan 13403-9418653-1 39. Patton Bakht Amin Noor-ul-Huda 13403-5734723-3 40. Patton Rahim ullah Sabit shah - 41. Dubair Colony Abdullah Guldat - 42. Dubair Colony Khan Muhammad Shah Nawaz 13403-3332634-3 43. Dubair Colony Muhammad Ayaz Bajus - 44. Dubair Colony Abdul Bari Bahida Khan - 45. Dubair Colony Sher Muhammad Kiki - 46. Sholgara Muhammad Duraj Sher Afzal 13403-1532773-3 47. Sholgara Nabeel khan shah ali 13402-1434321-2 Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-C [2/3] 48. Sholgara Alam sher Jamrus 13403-1532554-2 49. Sholgara Rasool Khan Mir Afzal 13403-0152324-1 50. Sholgara Abdulrehman Bashir ahmed 13405-1545132-1 51. Basham Bakhtezar Shah Gul Wazar 15502-3040118-3 52. Basham Shah Khalid Noor Hani Gul 15501-2274662-5 53. Basham Saed Ali Shah Sir baz 15502-9901970-5 54. Basham Waseem Shah Mamtareen Shah 15502-7447951-9 55. Basham Sadam hussain Mohsin shah 15502-5831788-5 56. Seror Shang Itibar Gul Subat Khan 15502-2005166-7 57. Seror Shang Hafeez ullah Gul Nabi 15502-4087128-3 58. Seror Shang Umer Tesar Gelender Khan 15502-3716976-3 59. Seror Shang Muhammad Khan Mahmmad 15502-3716976-3 60. Seror Shang Gul Nabi Subat Khan 15502-2005770-3 61. Shaga Banda Shaib Zada Gul Sakeen 15502-4859351-3 62. Shaga Banda Umer Zada Abdul Hakeem 42201-2473162-7 63. Shaga Banda Kositana Abdul Hakeem 15501-3477557-9 64. Shaga Banda Naseeb Khan Shareef Khan 15502-9207999-7 65. Shaga Banda Mujib Rahman Badar Munir 15502-1540345-3 66. Sajbir Saeed ur Rehman Zarat Wali 13201-9644020-9 67. Sajbir Zafer Khan Ali Asghar 13201-3726857-9 68. Sajbir Naitullah Kabir Khan 13201-9216983-3 69. Sajbir Mabat khan Fakeer sher 13201-1834960-9 70. Sajbir Ikram ullah Khan Zada 13201-6563666-7 71. Gim Baara Umer Zada Gens 13201-1837956-7 72. Gim Baara Dertab Glacier 13202-6030785-3 73. Gim Baara Hassan Zada Gul Zada 13201-1817459-7 74. Gim Baara Sahreen Afsar 13201-4202775-5 75. Gim Baara Muhammad Sharif Safdar 13201-0920624-3 76. Abun Sheen Khan Toor Khan 13201-9993388-9 77. Abun Muhammad Zaid Ahmed Jan 13202-0744548-7 78. Abun Minhag Abdul Rehman 13202-0744057-5 79. Abun Ameer Zada Sohbat 13201-1833729-1 80. Abun Jaanat Gul Gul Muhammad 13201-7338342-7 81. Daut Abdul Aziz Majeed 15503-1218539-1 82. Daut Salahudin Badar Gul 13202-0729917-5 83. Daut Nabi Ur Rehman Muhammad Imran 15503-8228169-3 84. Daut Muhammad Saleem Baramand 15503-2427921-1 85. Daut Amanullah Himaash Khan 15503-2104117-9 86. Carkool Abdul Razaq Syed Zareen 15503-6961600-3 87. Carkool Sangeen Mian Sardar 15503-4680276-3 88. Carkool Inam Ullah Abdul Jalil 15503-9573478-1 89. Carkool Fazle Hameed Saeed Hubab 15503-5704730-7 90. Carkool Hashim Ali Saeed Sahib Saeed 15503-7331136-1 91. Thakot Colony Mujahedin Qader Gul 13202-8291354-1 92. Thakot Colony Ferhan Hamaash Gul 13202-1068964-9 93. Thakot Colony Hanif-Ur-Rehman Samer Gul 13202-0781449-1 94. Thakot Colony Fazal Muhammad Musharaf Gul 13202-6842559-7 95. Thakot Colony Zeralam Khan Eeser Gul 13202-0776020-3 96. Ghoriyar Mustana Khan Yousaf 42401-2457984-5 97. Ghoriyar Sakhiullah Zar Gul 13202-0874650-9 Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-C [3/3] 98. Ghoriyar Munawar Khan Zar Muhammad 13202-0719191-5 99. Ghoriyar Muhammad Arif Zar Muhammad 13202-0735199-5 100. Ghoriyar Shah Faisal Nabeel Khan 13202-0735211-4 101. Sado Khan Rehman Zada Mobeen 13502-2516622-5 102. Sado Khan Abdul Razaq Jankase Khan 13502-3797623-1 103. Sado Khan Bakhi alam Jan Khatab 13504-6390723-3 104. Sado Khan Khan Malik Malik Waseem 13504-7490223-1 105. Sado Khan Saminullah Wajullah 13501-3552182-1 106. Zozari Seeri Wajid Ali Saif 13504-2244743-1 107. Zozari Seeri Noor Nabi Said Muhammad Akram 13601-0488503-5 108. Zozari Seeri Shabur Ahmad Fazal Zamar 13504-9131659-3 109. Zozari Seeri Said Nazeer Aijaib Said 42401-7659346-7 110. Zozari Seeri Fazal Rabi Khetab 42101-1230871-5 Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-D [1/2] Appendix D: List of Key Informants D-1: List of Identifying Persons Sr. No. Village Name Father Name CNIC No. Contact No. 1. Siglo Faiz-ur-Rahman Majap 13401-4203839-7 0321-9824247 2. Chuchang Shabbir Khan Molvi Mehran 13401-1500583-3 0312-5905199 Khan 3. Goshali Abdul Qayyam Hijab Khan 13401-1503026-5 0313-2266889 4. Jalkot Faiz-ul-Haq Jamroz Khan 13401-1509046-1 0300-5645656 5. Kuz Kereo Alam Zab Khan Malik Jan 13403-4703562-9 0301-5828515 6. Shilkanabad Haibat khan Malik Kadam 13402-7195922-7 0344-9174931 Khan 7. Ghaziabad Muhammad Faiz Malook 13402-1153045-7 0342-8239984 Imtiaz 8. Patten Sajjad Ahmad Muhammad Iqbal 13302-0505636-5 0300-5088734 9. Dubair Abdullah Guldat - 0303-8637287 colony 10. Sholgara Rasool Khan Mir Afzal 13403-0152324-1 0307-6630159 11. Besham Habib ur rehman Afzal wadood 15501-3928397-5 0346-8071569 12. Seror Goher Ali Gelender Khan 15502-7985946-1 0346-9626163 Shang 13. Shaga Zer Muneer Qazi Rehman 15502-0439895-7 0342-9114454 Banda 14. Sajbir Bakhat Zada Ghulam Nabi 13201-1816810-5 0343-9516880 15. Gim Baara Gul Taj Habib gul 13201-9369965-5 16. Abun Faiz Muhammad Hujaj 13201-2311258-5 0345-9585918 17. Daut Haleem ullah Satullah 15503-3716042-9 0344-9546037 18. Carkool Hassan Syed Gul Naseer 42101-1741659-3 0346-8940855 19. Thakot Nazam din Bader Gul 13202-5370518-1 0346-9622928 colony 20. Garjar Mukreem Muhammad 13202-0753277-1 0345-9574097 Rehman 21. Sado Khan Bakhi alam Jan Khatab 13504-6390723-3 0346-3581346 22. Zozari Seeri Aziz ullah Salam shah 13504-2244743-1 0342-2293250 . D-2: List of District Fishery Officials S.No. District .Name Designation Contact No. 1. Kohistan Taj Muhammad Assistant Director Fisheries, Patton 0301-8191303 Shahid 2. Shangla Assistant Director Fisheries, Alpuri 0347-9448368 Mahmood Assistant Director Fisheries, 3. Battagram Faheem Akhtar 0345-9051165 Battagram 4. Torgher Akbar Khan Assistant Commissnor, Torgher 0997-239879 5. Torgher Khalid Khan Assistant Director Fisheries, Torgher 0300-5688085 Haripur/ Muhammad 6. Deputy Director Fisheries, Khalabat 0346-7868651 Tarrbela Shafi Marwat . . Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-D [2/2] D-3: List of Fish Vendors Sr. No. District Name M.arket Name CNIC No. Contact No. 1. Kohistan Muhammad Ayub Kamaila Bazar 15501-0542596-3 0346-4344658 2. Kohistan Gul Zareen Patton Bazar 13403-2083226-3 0345-9488494 3. Shangla Janzeb Besham Bazar 15402-9690133-7 0343-9531514 4. Shangla Namat ullah Besham Bazar - 0346-9607369 Battagram 5. Battagram Sher Muhammad 13202-4889414-7 - Bazar Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-E [1/6] Appendix E: Photo-log of the Downstream fishing communities, Baseline and Impacts Assessment Field Study Fisherman catching fish at Siglo Nullah Consultation with fishermen at Siglo Nullah Fishermen catching fish from Indus at Consultation with fishermen at Chuchang Choochang Fish Catch from Indus River at Chuchang Consultation with fish vendor at Komila Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-E [2/6] Consultation at Dubair Meeting with AD Fisheries at pattan Consultation at Pattan Fish Seller at Besham Fish at Seller’s Shop in Besham Fish Selling at Batagram Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-E [3/6] Fishery License of Fishermen at Batagram Consultation at Abun Consultation at Sharkool Khas Consultation at Dawoot Fish Catch at Dochi Bandah Consultation at Ghazi Abad Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-E [4/6] Consultation at Ghorhiyal Poison Used for Fish Catch Consultation at Kuz Kereo Wood Log caught from Indus at Sajbir Fish Catch from Indus River at Seror Shang Net Used for Fish Catch at Shanga Banda Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-E [5/6] Consultation at Shilkan Abad Consultation at Shollingrah Office of the D.D (Fisheries), Mansehra Meeting with AC, Torgher Consultation at Thakot Colony Fish Nets in the Indus River at Thakot Social and Resettlement Management Plan Vol.11 Downstream Fishing Communities: Baseline and Impact Assessments APPENDIX-E [6/6] Fisherman Catching Fish at Alpuri Trout Hatchery at Alpuri Consultation with Fishermen at Tarbella Meeting with AD Fisheries, Tarbella Reservoir Area