ICRR 10683 Report Number : ICRR10683 ICR Review Operations Evaluation Department 1. Project Data : Date Posted : 08/07/2000 PROJ ID : P039197 OEDID: OEDID : L4211 Appraisal Actual Project Name : Rio de Janeiro State US$M ) Project Costs (US$M) 5900 6304.1 Reform Privatization Project Country : Brazil Loan/ US$M ) Loan /Credit (US$M) 250 199.6 Sector, Major Sect .: Public Sector US$M ) Cofinancing (US$M) 5650 6104.5 Management Adjustment, Public Sector Management L/C Number : L4211 FY ) Board Approval (FY) 98 Partners involved : Closing Date 12/31/1998 12/31/1998 Prepared by : Reviewed by : Group Manager : Group : Anwar M. Shah Jorge Garcia-Garcia Ruben Lamdany OEDCR 2. Project Objectives and Components a. Objectives The project sought to support the timely completion of the state's privatization and concession program . b. Components The project financed (i) the costs of restructuring state enterprises in preparation for privatization and /or concesssion including the cost of rightsizing the government work force; (ii) payrolls of employees of the suburban rail company that was transferred from the federal government to the state; (iii) the cost of restructuring and privatizing BANERJ, the state bank. c. Comments on Project Cost, Financing and Dates The project financed 3.2% of the total costs of the above mentioned programs . It closed on time and the undisbursed balance of US$50 million was cancelled. 3. Achievement of Relevant Objectives : With the single exception of CEDAE, the water and sanitation agency, all planned privatization or concessions were completed by the project closing date . This included the sale, liquidation or concession of the state bank, the electricity utility, the gas distribution company and its subsidiary, the suburban railways, the subway, the state ferry service, two bus companies and the bus terminal management agency . A regulatory agency for the private provision of public services was also established . 4. Significant Outcomes /Impacts : A leaner and more efficient state government sector was achieved and the enabling environment for private sector participation in the provision of public services was strengthened . 5. Significant Shortcomings (including non -compliance with safeguard policies ): The state water and sanitation agency, CEDAE could not be concessioned due to legal and political difficulties . 6. Ratings : ICR OED Review Reason for Disagreement /Comments Outcome : Satisfactory Satisfactory Institutional Dev .: Partial Substantial The project helped focus the state public sector on its core mandate. Sustainability : Likely Likely Bank Performance : Highly Satisfactory Highly Satisfactory Borrower Perf .: Satisfactory Satisfactory Quality of ICR : Exemplary 7. Lessons of Broad Applicability : The ICR distills important lessons from this experience . These include (a) Splitting of the state bank into "good" and "bad" banks leaves the state a large fiscal, legal and administrative burden after privatization; (b) Independence of state regulatory agencies may be safeguarded through state constitution or the federal regulatory powers; and (c) Legal conflicts of competence must be resolved before including any public agency in a concession program . 8. Audit Recommended? Yes No 9. Comments on Quality of ICR : The ICR is of exemplary quality. It provides a candid, thorough and thoughtful analysis of project achievements and shortcomings. It further distills important lessons from this experience . It should be on the must read list for those writing ICRs.