E4415 V1 ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT Emergency Employment Investment Project (EEIP) ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SCREENING AND ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK (ESSAF) I. OBJECTIVES 1. The main objective of the Environmental and Social Screening and Assessment Framework (ESSAF) is to provide general policies, guidelines, and procedures to be integrated into the implementation of the European Union-supported emergency Employment project in Egypt which will be implemented by the Social Fund for Development (SFD) with support from the World Bank (WB). This Framework has been developed to identify the environmental requirements needed to ensure that all sub-projects are in compliance with the national environmental protection laws, regulations and guidelines in Egypt, and the W orld Bank’s safeguards policies more specifically. Furthermore, the ESSAF will provide clear guidance which will ascertain that all environmental and social impacts are being addressed effectively for the successful appraisal, design, and implementation of the sub-projects. More specifically, the ESSAF will: a. Provide a standardized safeguard screening and assessment process that enables the SFD to quickly and effectively assess the likely environmental impacts associated with any of the sub-projects b. Provide some examples of the necessary mitigation measures (in line with best practices) to counter such impacts. c. Include the monitoring and evaluation indicators that are necessary for implementing the ESSAF. d. Provide guidance on the approach to be taken during consultation and disclosure requirements II. GENERAL PRINCIPLES 2. While ensuring due diligence in managing potential environmental and social risks, one has to recognize the emergency nature of the proposed project which aims at providing assistance towards creating or maintaining infrastructure using labor-intensive techniques. Given that, the ESSAF is based on the following principles:  The proposed operations will support multiple sub-projects, the detailed designs of which may not be known at appraisal. To ensure effective application of the World Bank’s safeguard policies, the ESSAF provides guidance on the approach to be taken during implementation for the selection and design of sub-projects and the planning of mitigation measures;  The proposed project supports only environmental category “B” or “C” sub-projects as per the World Bank classification for safeguards; 1  No sub-projects will be eligible for funding that trigger OP 4.12. In particular, all works, even if there are design changes, will be done on public land and will not result in relocation or loss of shelter, loss of assets or access to assets, or loss of income sources or means of livelihoods; and  No sub-projects that involve the use of international waterways will be financed under this project;  Sub-projects entailing weeding activities shall be manual weeding (i.e., by hand) and will not involve the use of pesticides. As a result, the World Bank OP 4.09 is not triggered; and  Consultation and disclosure requirements will be simplified to meet the special needs of these operations. This ESSAF will be shared with and disclosed in the SFD and relevant governorates in Egypt as well as in the World Bank Info Shop. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3. The proposed project sets out to (i) create short-term employment opportunities for the unemployed unskilled and semi-skilled workers in selected locations in Egypt; (ii) contribute to the creation and/ or maintenance of community infrastructure and services; (iii) improve access to basic infrastructure and community services among target population; and (iv) to improve the employability of young men and women through short-term training or other support services to facilitate transitions to wage and self-employment. The project comprises the four following components: Component 1: Employment-Intensive Small-scale Sub-projects (≈ € 1 million) This component finances labor- intensive small scale infrastructure employment creation programs. Specifically, the projects will support labor-intensive small scale infrastructure public works subprojects such as canal weed reduction/cleaning, river Nile bank protection, rural housing upgrading, pavement of rural roads, school rehabilitations, among others. The sub- projects will be contracted out to the private contractors. Infrastructure operations and maintenance procedures need to be defined and agreed upon with beneficiaries and other stakeholders during the sub-project design phase (SFD, Ministries, and Governorates). Component 2:Intensive Community Service Subprojects and Youth Employment Activities (≈ € 57 million) This component will support labor-intensive community service subprojects through the provision of grants, to local communities ( NGOs/CBOs ) for such services as solid waste management/collection and environmental cleaning campaigns in villages, early childhood education projects. mother and child health awareness home visit programs, employment in illiteracy eradication projects , among others , including youth employment in rural and urban areas through pilots projects. A majority of the beneficiaries of this component will be women, and it will be implemented by NGOs. 2 Component 3 : Improving Workers Employability (≈ € 6 million) The component will finance two types of youth employment activities one aimed at the youth in urban areas and the second for youth in rural areas. A comprehensive package of the training (basic, technical, life skills, and on- the job), job-search assistance , and wage or training subsidies to facilitate the transition into wage- employment will be piloted for urban youth. The component will also finance an integrated set of services (training , financing, advisory, And access to markets and value chains ) to facilitate the transition into self-employment for rural youth. These services will be developed based on market research or feasibility studies already available or to be carried out during the preparation of the respective sub-projects. Sub-projects will be implemented by NGOs in urban areas. Beneficiaries will be young men and women in the project 's target provinces who are out of school and out of (full time) work. Young women will be specifically targeted by making female participation an evaluation criterion during the request for proposals and assessing proposed design features to attract female participants (e.g. female – only classes, child care, and parent outreach). Component 4: project implementation and capacity building (≈ € 3 million) The implementation support program for the project includes (i) the provision of the project implementation support , including project management , financial management and procurement;(ii) public information ,EU visibility . communication and social mobilization strategy and implementation support ; (iii) technical verification and quality assurance for the design and implementation of the above 3 components ; and (iv)capacity building for SFD and governorate staff, as well as for the implementation NGOs procured as needed. 3 IV. POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 4. The sub-projects of the proposed project are likely to result in a number of positive environmental and socio-economic impacts. That is, all of the sub-projects are expected to generate employment opportunities and improve income generation for many individuals as well as improve the living conditions and livelihoods especially for those representing the low- or poorest segments of society in targeted areas and communities. This includes, but not limited to, improved access to drinking water and an improvement in water quality through the extension of water networks. Within this context, there will be a decrease in water-borne diseases and improvement in health and sanitary conditions in general. Similarly, the improvement of housing conditions and solid waste disposal and management for the poor will lead to positive health and environmental impacts. 5. However, despite the substantial positive environmental impacts that will result from the implementation of the sub-projects, there may still be some negative environmental impacts though potentially minor and not significant. V. APPLICABLE WORLD BANK SAFEGUARD POLICIES 6. This ESSAF has been developed specifically for ensuring environmental and social due diligence for all the sub-projects funded by this project. It is intended to ensure that, for all activities financed by the project, all efforts are made to avoid and minimize environmental and social impacts; and where they cannot be avoided, that these impacts are identified and the necessary mitigation measures are developed and implemented following the relevant Egyptian laws as well as the World Bank policies. 7. In addition, this Framework is to assist the SFD in screening all the sub-projects for their likely environmental impacts, identifying documentation and preparation requirements. 8. World Bank BP/OP 4.01 Environmental Assessment. Most of the proposed sub- projects are likely to focus on canal weed reduction and protection of river banks, rehabilitation of rural housing, maintenance of rural roads, school rehabilitation, and solid waste collection. Given the nature of the proposed sub-projects, this policy will be triggered. Individual sub- projects will be screened and assigned the appropriate environmental categorization and environmental due diligence will be conducted in accordance with OP 4.01. 9. Considering the nature and magnitude of potential environmental impacts from relatively limited scale and magnitude of reconstruction works, sub-projects classified as “B” or “C” will be financed by the project. Any sub-projects classified as category ‘A’ will not be eligible for funding under this operation. VI. APPROACH TO ADDRESS ENVIRONMENTAL SAFEGUARD ISSUES 10. In accordance with World Bank policy OP/BP 8.00, the ESSAF will guide the environment social safeguard planning and compliance during implementation of sub-projects. 4 As sub-projects will be identified and proposed for financing in a continuous manner during the project implementation period, screening for potential environmental and social impacts will be conducted and mitigation and management measures will be developed in line with the agreed ESSAF. 11. Environmental and social impact screening, mitigation and management measures development and implementation will be carried out as per the following: First: Screening for potential environmental and social safeguard impacts and determination of safeguards Category according to Egyptian laws and regulations, and World Bank policies; Second: Review of safeguards screening by World Bank; Third: Preparation of safeguards documents, consultation and disclosure; Fourth: Review and clearance of the safeguard documents within the government or/and by the Bank; and Fifth: Implementation of agreed actions; and supervision, monitoring, and evaluation 5 A. Screening for Potential Environmental and Social Safeguard Impacts and Determination of Safeguards Category for Each Sub-project 12. Once sub-projects have been identified, the environmental safeguard specialists at SFD will concurrently screen each sub-project to determine the applicable Egyptian laws and regulations, the World Bank safeguards policies and guidelines and the corresponding safeguard instruments (i.e., EIA, EMP) which need to be prepared and implemented. Annex 1 provides a proposed checklist of the likely environmental impacts to be filled out for each sub-project or group of sub-projects. 13. The results of the screening exercise will determine the categorization for each sub- project. Environmental Safeguards Screening 14. With respect to environmental screening of sub-projects, the Egyptian national regulations and World Bank policies and guidelines are considered on the whole to be closely- related; both are impact-based and will require the SFD to identify and assess potential impacts to environmental components such as water, air, land and natural habitats and biodiversity. 15. For specific screening according to World Bank policies, the SFD will use the screening tool in Annex 1 to propose an environmental classification for each sub-project as follows:  Category B: A proposed sub-project may have some adverse environmental impacts, but less adverse than those of Category A projects. These impacts are typically site-specific; few if any of them are irreversible; and in most cases mitigation measures can be readily designed. The great majority of sub-projects for rehabilitation and reconstruction works are likely to fall in this category.  Category C: A proposed sub-project is likely to have minimal or no adverse environmental impacts. Determination of Environmental Safeguards Documents for Sub-projects 16. The environmental safeguards documentation requirements for each sub-project will be determined based on the screening procedures, as follows:  Category B: Sub-projects will require an EIA or simplified EIA (as required under the Egyptian laws and regulations) and or an EMP (as per the World Bank policy) consisting, at a minimum, of standard environmental codes of practices supplemented, if necessary, with additional analysis. The sub-project specific EMP and or standard environmental codes of practices, including chance-finds of physical cultural resources, will be included in all construction contracts/bidding documents.  Category C: Sub-projects that are rated Category C do not require environmental safeguards documents, but will comply with the Egyptian regulatory requirements. 6 B. Review of Safeguards Screening by the World Bank 17. The SFD will prepare a safeguards screening summary for each sub-project in a format specified in the Operations Manual. This will summarize: (a) the recommended categorization according to World Bank policies; and, (b) the proposed environment al safeguards documentation requirements for the sub-project. The safeguards screening summary will be part of the sub-project identification package that will be submitted to the Bank by the SFD. 18. The World Bank will review the screening of sub-projects on a selective basis to verify that the screening tools and choice of documents are being applied appropriately and consistently. C. Preparation of Safeguards Documents, Consultation and Disclosure 19. This ESSAF will be shared with the SFD and will be disclosed in-country in both Arabic and English by them in Egypt. The ESSAF will also be shared with the relevant ministries and governorates (i.e., local authorities) that are implementing the sub-projects. Disclosure will also be carried out through the World Bank’s InfoShop. The other relevant specific safeguard documents/mitigation plans prepared for the sub-projects will also be subsequently disclosed. 20. For Category B1 sub-projects, the SFD will consult the stakeholders and/or the project- affected groups and local non-governmental organizations on the project's environmental and social aspects, and will take their views into account. The SFD will initiate these consultations as early as possible, and for meaningful consultations, will provide relevant material in a timely manner prior to consultation, in Arabic and in a form that is comprehendible and accessible to the groups being consulted. 21. Once the screening and documentation requirements are agreed by the Bank and confirmed by the SFD, the project proponents, with assistance from the SFD, will develop the relevant safeguard documents and impact mitigation measures. 22. Project proponents and the SFD are encouraged to liaise closely with the Bank if any issues arise that may require clarification from the Bank on the application of World Bank policies. 23. Safeguards documents will be subject to consultation and disclosure in an accessible place, in a timely manner, in a form and language understandable to key stakeholders, prior to the finalization of the said documents. Particular attention will be given to ensure that the project stakeholders receive adequate time and ready access to draft documents before consultation is carried out. This is essentially to ensure that the project stakeholders participate in and contribute to the sub-project planning and implementation, and thereby help minimize any sub- project impacts while maximize the benefits. 1 As defined in World Bank Operational Policy 4.01, Environmental Assessment. 7 D. Review and Clearance of Safeguards Documents 24. Review and clearance of the environmental and social safeguards documents according to national regulations is the responsibility of the SFD. 25. The requirements for review and clearance of the environmental documents by the World Bank are as follows:  Category B: The Simplified EA (or EIA) and EMP for Category B sub-projects will not be subject to World Bank review and clearance prior to approval of the sub-project. However, these documents will be post-reviewed on a selective basis during supervision missions.  Category C: No review required by the World Bank. E. Implementation of Agreed Actions and Supervision, Monitoring and Evaluation Implementation 26. Implementation of the safeguards measures during sub-project implementation is the responsibility of sub-project proponents. Supervision 27. The SFD will supervise the implementation of the EMP. The World Bank task team will regularly visit the sub-project areas throughout project implementation in order to:  Provide guidance and assist in the preparation of safeguards instruments;  Review the screening results, due diligence review report, and safeguard documents of proposed sub-projects;  Supervise the implementation of the safeguards instruments to ensure they are implemented in compliance with the Bank policy requirements. Monitoring and Evaluation 28. The SFD will engage qualified and experienced consultants to carry out the monitoring program to provide information on key environmental and social aspects of the sub-projects and the effectiveness of the planned mitigation measures. This will enable the government and the Bank to evaluate the performance of the environmental program and allow corrective action to be taken as needed. Annex 2 provides a checklist for environmental monitoring indicators for typical sub-projects. 8 VII. RESPONSIBILITIES FOR SAFEGUARDS SCREENING AND MITIGATION 29. In the environmental and social mitigation planning process, described above, the various institutional roles and responsibilities are: Environmental and social impact screening: the SFD through its specialized staff comprising the 32 Environmental Focal Points (EFPs) from regional offices and headquarters and/or qualified consultants will undertake environmental screening of each proposed sub-project , the findings of which will be post-reviewed by the World Bank on sample basis. The EFPs will also undertake social safeguards training. Preparation of safeguards documents: individual sub-project proponents are responsible for planning, design and implementation of individual sub-projects, including environmental and social safeguard documents and mitigation measures, and will engage qualified consultants as needed. Supervision: the SFD with the assistance of its specialized staff comprising the 32 Environmental Focal Points (EFPs) and/or qualified consultants will guide, supervise and manage the process of safeguard planning and implementation work. Overall responsibility: the SFD will assume the overall responsibility for the planning and implementation of safeguards documents under the project. The World Bank will support the process through periodic supervision and training. Review and clearance of the safeguard documents: safeguards documents will be reviewed and cleared as per the provisions of the Law No. 4 for 1994 and its Executive Regulations and also its amendment, Law No. 9 for 2009. World Bank review and clearance of the safeguards documents: the World Bank will carry out sample post-reviews during supervision missions. Safeguards documents implementation: the sub-project proponents will be responsible for the implementation of the safeguard documents, under the direction and supervision of the SFD. Supervision, monitoring and evaluation: the SFD through its environmental focal points and/or qualified consultants will assume the overall responsibility for the supervision, monitoring, and evaluation of the safeguard document implementation. Environmental Safeguards Guidelines: For all Sub-projects that are determined to be "Category B" sub-projects according to the terms of the ESSAF, the SFD will develop Environmental Safeguards Guidelines which will guide the specific regional office in the implementation of the ESSAF. No "Cat B" Sub-projects should be carried out before such Environmental Safeguards Guidelines are prepared. Category B sub-projects will be selectively post-reviewed. In addition, the Bank will review the Environmental Safeguard Guidelines to ensure consistency with the ESSAF. 9 VIII. CAPACITY-BUILDING AND MONITORING OF SAFEGUARDS FRAMEWORK IMPLEMENTATION 30. As part of the capacity-building to be provided for implementation of the proposed operations, the Environmental/Safeguards Focal Points at the SFD as well as the relevant staff of the concerned governorates, NGOs, and other project stakeholders, will also receive training in ESSAF’s application. 10 ANNEX 1 CHECKLIST OF LIKELY ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS OF SUB-PROJECTS This Form is to be used by the Safeguards Focal Point (SFP) at the SFD in Screening Sub-project Applications. Note: One copy of this form and accompanying documentation to be kept in the SFD and one copy to be sent to the task team leader of the World Bank. Name of Sub-project: Number of Sub-project: Proposing Agency: Sub-project Location: Sub-project Objective: Infrastructure to be rehabilitated: Estimated Cost: Proposed Date of Commencement of Work: Technical Drawing/Specifications Reviewed (circle answer): Yes __ No __ No ISSUES Yes No A. Zoning and Land Use Planning 1. Will the sub-project affect land use zoning and planning or conflict with prevalent land use patterns? 2. Will the sub-project involve significant land disturbance or site clearance? 3. Will the sub-project land be subject to potential encroachment by urban or industrial use or located in an area intended for urban or industrial development? B. Utilities and Facilities 4. Will the sub-project require the setting up of ancillary production facilities? 5. Will the sub-project make significant demands on utilities and services? 6. Will the sub-project require significant levels of accommodation or service amenities to support the workforce during construction (e.g., contractor will need more than 20 workers)? 11 C Water and Soil Contamination 7. Will the subproject require large amounts of raw materials or construction materials? 8. Will the subproject generate large amounts of residual wastes, construction material waste or cause soil erosion? 9. Will the sub-project result in potential soil or water contamination (e.g., from oil, grease and fuel from equipment yards)? 10. Will the sub-project lead to contamination of ground and surface waters by herbicides for vegetation control and chemicals (e.g., calcium chloride) for dust control? 11. Will the sub-project lead to an increase in suspended sediments in streams affected by road cut erosion, decline in water quality and increased sedimentation downstream? 12. Will the sub-project involve the use of chemicals or solvents? 13. Will the sub-project lead to the destruction of vegetation and soil in the right-of-way, borrow pits, waste dumps, and equipment yards? 14. Will the sub-project lead to the creation of stagnant water bodies in borrow pits, quarries, etc., encouraging for mosquito breeding and other disease vectors? D. Noise and Air Pollution Hazardous Substances 15. Will the sub-project increase the levels of harmful air emissions? 16. Will the sub-project increase ambient noise levels? 17. Will the sub-project involve the storage, handling or transport of hazardous substances? E. Fauna and Flora 18. Will the sub-project involve the disturbance or modification of existing drainage channels (rivers, canals) or surface water bodies (wetlands, marshes)? 19. Will the sub-project lead to the destruction or damage of terrestrial or aquatic ecosystems or endangered species directly or by induced development? 20. Will the sub-project lead to the disruption/destruction of wildlife through interruption of migratory routes, disturbance of wildlife habitats, and noise-related problems? F. Destruction/Disruption of Land and Vegetation 21. Will the sub-project lead to unplanned use of the infrastructure being developed? 22. Will the sub-project lead to long-term or semi-permanent destruction of soils in cleared areas not suited for agriculture? 23. Will the sub-project lead to the interruption of subsoil and overland drainage patterns (in areas of cuts and fills)? 24. Will the sub-project lead to landslides, slumps, slips and other mass movements in road cuts? 25. Will the sub-project lead to erosion of lands below the roadbed receiving concentrated outflow carried by covered or open drains? 26. Will the sub-project lead to long-term or semi-permanent destruction of soils in cleared areas not suited for agriculture? 12 27. Will the sub-project lead to health hazards and interference of plant growth adjacent to roads by dust raised and blown by vehicles? G. International Waterways Issues 28 Does the sub-project use or otherwise affect an international or trans-boundary waterway? H. Land Acquisition and Resettlement 29 Does the sub-project require land acquisition? 30 If so, will this land acquisition be involuntary? 31 If so, will this involuntary land acquisition lead to relocation or loss of shelter? 32 If so, will this involuntary land acquisition lead to loss of assets or access to assets? If so, will this involuntary land acquisition lead to loss of income sources or means of livelihood (whether or not the affected persons must move to another location)? 33 Will the sub-project lead to the involuntary restriction of access to legally designated parks and protected areas resulting in adverse impacts on the livelihoods of the displaced persons? Screening Tool Completed and Reviewed by: Signed by Environmental Specialist in PMO: Name: ______________________________________ Title and Date: ______________________________________ 13 ANNEX 2 CHECKLIST FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING INDICATORS FOR TYPICAL SUB-PROJECTS School Sub-Project: Monitoring Environmental Impact Monitoring Indicator Frequency Air Pollution Noise Odors Dust Smoke Annually Pollutants (i.e.CO, NOx. And SO2) Asbestos Paint containing lead Water Pollution Electrical Conductivity BOD – COD Annually E-Coli Nitrates Soil Pollution Oil Wastewater Annually Solid Waste Health-Care Unit Sub-Project: Environmental Impact Monitoring Indicator Monitoring Frequency Air Pollution Radiation Noise Odors Dust Smoke Annually Pollutants (i.e.CO, NOx. And SO2) Asbestos Paint containing lead VOC Water Pollution Electrical Conductivity BOD – COD Annually E-Coli Nitrates Soil Pollution Oil Wastewater Annually Medical Liquid or Solid Waste Municipal Solid Waste 14 Road Sub-Project: Environmental Impact Monitoring Indicator Monitoring Frequency Air Pollution Increase in traffic Noise Odors Dust Smoke Annually Pollutants (i.e.CO, NOx. And SO2) Asbestos Paint containing lead VOC Different Forms of Visual Solid Waste Pollution Construction Waste Green Areas Annually Sewage System Archeological Sites / Artifacts Water Pollution EC BOD-COD Annually E-Coli Nitrates Reduction or Migration of Productivity of water source Water Sources Annually Obstruction of Water Obstruction of canals on the road Collection Dispersion of natural canals Annually Road erosion Landslide, Erosion, and Falling rocks, soil, and debris on the road Structural Instability of Change in road width Annually Slopes Population Emigration Census Annually Tourism Support Determination of incoming tourists Semi-Annually 15 ANNEX 3: Examples of Negative Environmental Impacts that may be associated with Sub-projects2 Potential Environmental and Potential Environmental and Best Management Practices and Best Management Practices and Sub-Project Type Social Negative Impacts Social Negative Impacts Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measures During Project Construction During Project Operation Water Supply and  Mismanagement of  Monitoring of water  Disruption to biodiversity  Quality; operation, and Networks construction and demolition /  Regional water use plans (changes to fauna, flora, and maintenance plan rehabilitation waste  Proper drainage near wells and aquatic life)  Avoid harmful effects to  Disruption to biodiversity pumping stations  Increased air pollutant biodiversity during operation Road, and (changes to fauna, flora, and  Erosion control during emissions  Monitoring of water Irrigation Canals aquatic life) construction  Foul odors  Regional water use plans  Cut down of trees or  Construction during dry season  Changes in soil (erosion /  Erosion control during destruction of green areas  Include odor-control technology fertility / salinity / pollution) operation  Increased air pollutant in design  Gas emissions  Include odor-control technology emissions  Provide appropriate sized bins  Change in local climate in operation  Foul odors to collect construction waste  Accidents may occur leading  Use protective clothing and  Effluents to public water and arrange for periodic pick up to fire or personal injury masks for workers as systems and disposal appropriate.  Alteration of current alignment  Restrict activities to areas where  Train workers on health care of streams biodiversity is not adversely waste segregation and  Obstruction of irrigation affected occupational safety measures intakes  Avoid cutting trees and  Obstruction of flood water destruction of green areas, and course if necessary, re-vegetation  Alteration of surface water should be arranged and included quality or quantity in the project  Interference with existing  Control construction by fencing drainage networks site and spraying water over  Alteration of direction / quality working area to control dust of groundwater emissions  Changes in soil (erosion /  Consider project siting during fertility / salinity / pollution) the design phase  Gas emissions  Collect liquid effluents during  Dust pollution construction and avoid disposal  Change in local climate of untreated effluents into  Accidents may occur leading public water systems to fire or personal injury  Careful design and appropriate 2 The table provides a summary of some of the negative environmental impacts that may be associated with the sub-projects different components though it is not intended to provide an exhaustive list of all types of the sub-projects, their impacts, and their mitigation measures that shall be funded by the Project, rather, the table highlights the typical impacts that can be expected in the types of sub-projects that shall be financed by the Project 16 selection of irrigation systems  Use protective clothing and masks for workers as appropriate.  Train workers on health care waste segregation and occupational safety measures Waste  None perceived  None  The garbage streams contain  Avoiding contamination of Management all types of household and close by water bodies through other wastes, some of which random waste dumping. are hazardous.  Sound selection and siting of  Collection vehicles are not dumping areas, studies are covered during transport crucial for this type of project leads to littering.  Train workers on waste  Collection workers usually management and occupational have no special training or safety measures protection for handling these  Use protective clothing and wastes masks for workers as  Human scavengers at appropriate dumping area may be sorting  Vehicles must be covered through the waste. during transport.  Waste accumulating in  Waste generated should be dumping areas may burn collected frequently and storage spontaneously or by prohibited in streets. individuals resulting in air  Waste accumulated in dumping quality degradation from areas should be covered to smoke and dust. avoid scavenging and  Contamination of ground spontaneous burning water resources is of concern at dumping areas. Health Care  Mismanagement of demolition  Adequate sanitation and  Indoor air pollution  Control sources of indoor Related / rehabilitation waste disposal system for waste  Infectious waste may be pollution at source.  Disruption to biodiversity  Avoid cutting trees and disposed of in mixed form  Provide for appropriate in door (changes to fauna, flora, and destruction of green areas, and with municipal waste ventilation either naturally by aquatic life) if necessary, re-vegetation  Incinerators, if used, may not using larger windows or  Cut down of trees or should be arranged and included be properly sited, operated or mechanically by using air destruction of green areas in the project maintained leading to air circulation fans and vents  Changes in soil (erosion /  Restrict noisy activities to pollution and hazardous  Use different bags for 17 fertility / salinity / pollution) certain hours during the day to working conditions. municipal waste (black bags)  Dust pollution avoid disturbance  Accidents may occur leading and infectious waste (red bags).  Accidents may occur leading  Control construction by fencing to fire or personal injury  Get approval on incinerator to fire or personal injury site and spraying water over  Disruption / congestion of location before installation.  Transportation and traffic working area to control dust transportation and traffic  Maintain incinerator circulation emissions circulation periodically.  Increase traffic hazards to  Provide appropriate sized bins  Increase traffic hazards to  Use protective clothing and motorists and pedestrians to collect construction waste motorists and pedestrians masks for workers as  Introduction of new diseases and arrange for periodic pick up  Introduction of new diseases appropriate.  Excessive exposure to existing and disposal  Excessive exposure to  Train workers on health care diseases  Consider project siting during existing diseases waste segregation and  Attraction of pests and rodents the design phase  Attraction of pests and occupational safety measures  Generation of excess solid  Restrict activities to areas where rodents  Consultation with affected wastes and litter biodiversity is not adversely  Generation of excess solid communities  Transport, storage or disposal affected wastes and litter  Employ local citizens in sub- of regulated hazardous wastes  Use protective clothing and  Transport, storage or disposal project area in sub-project  Reduced aesthetic values / masks for workers as of regulated hazardous wastes operation visual pollution appropriate.  Reduced aesthetic values /  Education in proper sanitation  Risk of impact on historical,  Train workers on health care visual pollution and health practices archaeological, touristic, waste segregation and  Risk of impact on historical,  Avoidance of stagnant waters religious, or protected areas occupational safety measures archaeological, touristic, or  Careful management of and sites  Education in proper sanitation protected areas and sites pesticides  Risk of impact on recreational and health practices  Risk of impact on  Integrated pest management activities  Careful management of recreational activities programs  Increased noise levels / noise pesticides  Provide glowing traffic signs pollution  Integrated pest management and build artificial humps near programs construction area  Provide glowing traffic signs and build artificial humps near construction area  Strict avoidance of construction near archeological, historical, or religious areas. If any potential artifacts are discovered during construction, work will be temporarily halted in this area  Restrict noisy activities to certain hours during the day to avoid disturbance 18 ‫ندوة اإلفصاح‬ ‫عن إطار عمل التصنيف والتقييم البيئي واالجتماعي‬ ‫البرنامج العاجل للتشغيل كثيف العمالة‬ ‫‪ 22‬مارس ‪2102‬‬ ‫‪19‬‬ Emergency Employment Investment Project (EEIP) ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SCREENING AND ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK (ESSAF) Consultation & Disclosure Event Tuesday, 27th March, 2012 10:00 – Registration 10:30 10:30 – Introducing EEIP SFD/WB 10:45 10:45 – ESSAF Discussion (Part 1): 11:15  Objective  Project Description SFD/WB  Potential Environmental Impacts  WB Safeguard Policies 11:15 – Break 11:30 11:30 – ESSAF Discussion (Part 2): 12:00  Project Screening  Review of Safeguards Screening by the World Bank  Preparation of Safeguards Documents, Consultation and Disclosure  Review and Clearance of Safeguards Documents SFD/WB  Implementation of Agreed Actions and Supervision, Monitoring and Evaluation  Implementation  Responsibilities for Safeguards Screening and Mitigation 12:00 – Q&A SFD/WB 12:15 20 ‫ندوة اإلفصاح‬ ‫إلطار عمل التصنيف والتقييم البيئي واالجتماعي‬ ‫البرنامج العاجل للتشغيل كثيف العمالة‬ ‫‪ 72‬مارس ‪7107‬‬ ‫التسجيل‬ ‫‪01.01 – 01.11‬‬ ‫الصندوق ‪ +‬البنك‬ ‫تقديم للبرنامج العاجل للتشغيل كثيف العمالة‬ ‫‪01.01 – 01.01‬‬ ‫الدولي‬ ‫إطار عمل التصنيف والتقييم البيئي واالجتماعي (الجزء ‪:)1‬‬ ‫‪00.01 – 01.01‬‬ ‫‪ ‬الهدف‬ ‫الصندوق ‪ +‬البنك‬ ‫‪ ‬وصف المشروع‬ ‫الدولي‬ ‫‪ ‬التأثيرات البيئية المتوقعة‬ ‫‪ ‬اشتراطات السالمة للبنك الدولي‬ ‫استراحة‬ ‫‪00.01 – 00.01‬‬ ‫إطار عمل التصنيف والتقييم البيئي واالجتماعي (الجزء ‪:)2‬‬ ‫‪07.11 – 00.01‬‬ ‫‪ ‬تصنيف المشروعات‬ ‫‪ ‬عملية مراجعة التصنيف من خالل البنك الدولي‬ ‫‪ ‬إعداد المستندات الخاصة بالسالمة‬ ‫الصندوق ‪ +‬البنك‬ ‫‪ ‬مراجعة واعتماد مستندات السالمة‬ ‫الدولي‬ ‫‪ ‬تنفيذ اإلجراءات المتفق عليها وعمليات اإلشراف والمتابعة والتقييم‬ ‫‪ ‬التنفيذ‬ ‫‪ ‬المسئوليات المرتبطة بإجراءات السالمة الخاصة بالتصنيف وإجراءات‬ ‫الحد من المخاطر‬ ‫مناقشات‬ ‫‪07.01 – 07.11‬‬ ‫‪21‬‬ ‫أسماء الجمعيات المشاركة في‬ ‫ندوة اإلفصاح إلطار عمل‬ ‫التصنيف والتقييم البيئي اإلجتماعى‬ ‫البرنامج العاجل للتشغيل كثيف العمالة‬ ‫‪ 22‬مارس ‪2102‬‬ ‫الجهة‬ ‫اإلسم‬ ‫محافظة‬ ‫م‬ ‫نائب اإلتحاد العام للجمعيات األهلية‬ ‫د‪ .‬طلعت عبدالقوى‬ ‫‪0‬‬ ‫المدير التنفيذى لإلتحاد العام للجمعيات‬ ‫إبر‬ ‫اهيم الطوخى‬ ‫‪2‬‬ ‫االهلية‬ ‫جمعية تنظيم األسر‬ ‫ة بالفيوم‬ ‫أيمن إسماعيل‬ ‫الفيوم‬ ‫‪3‬‬ ‫جمعية تنمية المجتمع بنوار‬ ‫ة‬ ‫محمد صالح‬ ‫‪4‬‬ ‫جمعية تنمية المجتمع بترسا‬ ‫عيد سيد كامل‬ ‫‪5‬‬ ‫ى‬‫جمعية تنمية المجتمع باشنين النصار‬ ‫مجدى فاروق‬ ‫المنيا‬ ‫‪6‬‬ ‫جمعية تنظيم االسر‬ ‫ة‬ ‫حمدى سيد خليل‬ ‫‪8‬‬ ‫جمعية تنظيم االسر‬ ‫ة‬ ‫نظم صالح الدين عمر‬ ‫‪9‬‬ ‫ابطة المر‬ ‫أة العربية‬ ‫ر‬ ‫أحمد محمود حمدى‬ ‫‪01‬‬ ‫جمعية أطعمة الشارع‬ ‫أشرف حسين فرحات‬ ‫‪00‬‬ ‫جمعية الشباب للتنمية والبيئة‬ ‫‪ 02‬بنى سويف هانى أسماعيل‬ ‫جمعية الهالل األحمر بالشقر‬ ‫هناء عبداللطيف‬ ‫‪03‬‬ ‫جمعية سدمنت الجبل‬ ‫معاذ حسن وهبة‬ ‫‪04‬‬ ‫معهد الشئون الثقافية‬ ‫عبدالرحمن مندى‬ ‫‪05‬‬ ‫جمعية المالحية البحرية‬ ‫نجوى عبدالمنعم‬ ‫‪06‬‬ ‫‪22‬‬ ‫ى الجديدة بالعمر‬ ‫انية‬ ‫مؤسسة بنات عمر‬ ‫منال سامى عبد العزيز‬ ‫‪ 02‬الجيز‬ ‫ة‬ ‫جمعية خبر‬ ‫اء المحاسبين القانونيين‬ ‫ى على عبدالسالم‬‫قدر‬ ‫‪08‬‬ ‫بالعمر‬ ‫انية‬ ‫جمعية نجوم المجتمع بالعمر‬ ‫انية‬ ‫عبدالباسط مهدى‬‫جابر‬ ‫‪09‬‬ ‫جمعية روضة الخير ‪ -‬أوسيم‬ ‫عبدالرحيم إسماعيل‬ ‫‪21‬‬ ‫جمعية على زين العابدين – بوالق‬ ‫مصطفى حسين أحمد‬ ‫‪20‬‬ ‫مؤسسة ماكيتون ‪ -‬الهرم‬ ‫عصمت لطفى السيد‬ ‫‪22‬‬ ‫جمعية – عبادالرحمن ‪ -‬الهرم‬ ‫صفاء عبدالستار‬ ‫‪23‬‬ ‫جمعية ‪ -‬سنابل الرحمن‬ ‫محمد الملقب نجيب صالحين‬ ‫‪24‬‬ ‫جمعية الخدمات المتكاملة بالجيز‬ ‫ة‬ ‫محمود فهمى عبدالفتاح‬ ‫‪25‬‬ ‫ة بالجيز‬ ‫ة‬ ‫جمعية أمان االسر‬ ‫فيفيان فاروق عبدالفتاح‬ ‫‪26‬‬ ‫جمعية أنوار الهادى‬ ‫أنوار الهدى على على‬ ‫‪22‬‬ ‫جمعية أمباب خالد بن الوليد‬ ‫نبيل كمال‬ ‫‪28‬‬ ‫جمعية الضياء‬ ‫ى محمد‬‫شكر‬ ‫‪29‬‬ ‫جمعية أحمس لتنمية المجتمع‬ ‫أمال كمال‬ ‫‪31‬‬ ‫جمعية مسجد االهر‬ ‫ام‬ ‫محمد سعد‬ ‫‪30‬‬ ‫جمعية شباب االصالح‬ ‫ابر‬ ‫اهيم عبد الباقى شحاته يوسف‬ ‫‪ 32‬القليوبية‬ ‫جمعية شباب االصالح‬ ‫وائل حامد جابر طه الشعر‬ ‫اوى‬ ‫‪33‬‬ ‫جمعية ر‬ ‫ابعة العدوية‬ ‫د‪ .‬مصطفى الحمادى‬ ‫‪ 34‬القاهر‬ ‫ة‬ ‫البليدة ‪ -‬العياط‬ ‫د‪ .‬محمد جمال ماضى أبوالعز‬ ‫ايم‬ ‫‪35‬‬ ‫جمعية الوليدية ‪ -‬أسيوط‬ ‫محمد عثمان‬ ‫‪36‬‬ ‫‪23‬‬ Executive Summary ESSAF Consultative Meeting - EEIP March 27th, 2012 The Social Fund for Development (SFD) conducted a consultative event on March 27 th, 2012 for a period of 2.5 hours in one of the NGOs meeting room in Aguza, Cairo. The objective of the event was to introduce and consult the NGOs on the ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SCREENING AND ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK (ESSAF) which is an Environmental pre-requisite for the EEIP. About 36 attendees representing 27 NGOs attended the meeting, as well as, World Bank representatives and NGO federation representatives. The SFD introduces the EEIP to the audience with all the different sectors and the different stakeholders involved in the implementation and supervision roles (sponsoring, intermediate agencies and the contractors) for each of the different sectors. Then the discussions shifted to the required Egyptian Environmental regulations by the Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA) and the World Bank Environmental Safeguards and the ESSAF in specific. A Power Point presentation in Arabic (attached) was showed to the audience stating the main objective of the EEIP, Positive and negative impacts for the project, commitment to apply world bank safeguards (i.e. OP 4.01 & OP 8.00), ESSAF procedures, classification according to EEAA and World Bank (A, B and C) and finally, the needed actions to apply the ESSAF. 24 Some questions raised during the discussion such as, is the employment at the EEIP permanent or temporary? what are the roles for selecting the NGOs? What are the way of setting interventions' priorities? ….etc. All the questions were cleared and answered by the SFD representatives and at the end, it was mentioned that one of the benefits of this project is that all the documents will be on both the SFD website and the World Bank InfoShop. 25 ‫محضر ندوة اإلفصاح‬ ‫عن إطار عمل التصنيف و التقييم البيئي و االجتماعي‬ ‫البرنامج العاجل للتشغيل كثيف العمالة‬ ‫‪ 22‬مارس ‪2102‬‬ ‫قام الصندوق االجتماعي للتنمية بعقد ندوة بعنوان " اإلفصاح إلطار التصنيف و التقييم البيئي واإلجتماعي –‬ ‫البرنامج العاجل للتشغيل كثيف العمالة " وهي ضمن الفعاليات المتخذة بصدد توقيع إتفاقية بين الحكومة المصرية‬ ‫" ويمثلها الصندوق االجتماعي للتنمية"‪ ،‬و البنك الدولي ‪.‬‬ ‫‪7107/3/72‬‬ ‫التاريخ ‪:‬‬ ‫المكان ‪ :‬قاعة إجتماعات جمعية الخدمات المتكاملة بالعجوز‬ ‫ة‬ ‫الوقت‪ 02.45 – 01.31 :‬ظه ا‬ ‫ر‬ ‫الهدف من الندوة ‪ :‬يعد الهدف من هذه الندوة هو اإلفصاح و تعريف مؤسسات المجتمع المدني بإطار عمل‬ ‫التصنيف و التقييم البيئي واإلجتماعي للبرنامج العاجل للتشغيل كثيف العمالة ضمن فعاليات التحضير لإلتفاقية‬ ‫ي من ضمن إجر‬ ‫اءات البنك الدولي‪.‬‬ ‫المشار إليها و الممولة من البنك الدولي ‪ ،‬وكإجر‬ ‫اء ضرور‬ ‫و قد حضر الندوة السادة التالي أسماؤهم ‪:‬‬ ‫ممثل البنك الدولي‬ ‫األستاذة ‪ /‬نهاد مرسي كامل‬ ‫‪-‬‬ ‫نائب رئيس اإلتحاد العام للجمعيات األهلية‬ ‫الدكتور ‪ /‬طلعت عبد القوي‬ ‫‪-‬‬ ‫المدير التنفيذي لإلتحاد العام للجمعيات األهلية‬ ‫األستاذ ‪ /‬إبر‬ ‫اهيم محمد الطوخي‬ ‫‪-‬‬ ‫الصندوق اإلجتماعي للتنمية‬ ‫المهندس ‪ /‬مدحت مسعود‬ ‫‪-‬‬ ‫الصندوق اإلجتماعي للتنمية‬ ‫الدكتور ‪ /‬وليد درويش‬ ‫‪-‬‬ ‫الصندوق اإلجتماعي للتنمية‬ ‫األستاذ ‪ /‬عصام السيد‬ ‫‪-‬‬ ‫الصندوق اإلجتماعي للتنمية‬ ‫األستاذة ‪ /‬نهى أبو النجا‬ ‫‪-‬‬ ‫ة والقاهر‬ ‫ة والفيوم والقليوبية والمنيا وبني سويف‪.‬‬ ‫كما حضر ممثلي عدد ‪ 72‬جمعية أهلية من محافظات الجيز‬ ‫‪-‬‬ ‫‪ ‬بدأت الندوة بتسجيل أسماء السادة الحضور وتوزيع المادة العلمية للندوة عليهم ‪.‬‬ ‫أوال ‪ :‬قام المهندس ‪ /‬مدحت مسعود بإلقاء كلمة إفتتاحية للترحيب بالسادة الحضور ممثلي الجمعيات األهلية‬ ‫كونهم شركاء التنمية مع الصندوق اإلجتماعي للتنمية في مختلف المجاالت ‪ ،‬ثم قام سيادته بالتنويه عن أنه‬ ‫ي التفاوض حاليا‬ ‫ً بين الحكومة المصرية والبنك الدولي لتوفير تمويل للبرنامج العاجل للتشغيل كثيف العمالة‬ ‫جار‬ ‫والذي ينص على أن يكون الصندوق اإلجتماعي للتنمية هو الجهة المسئولة عن تنفيذ جميع أنشطة ومكونات‬ ‫‪26‬‬ ‫زر‬ ‫ات والمحافظات المعنية ومؤسسات المجتمع المدني ‪ ،‬وأن الهدف من هذه‬ ‫ع بالتعاون والتنسيق مع الو ا‬‫المشرو‬ ‫ة و النصف ماهر‬ ‫ة ‪ ،‬المتعطلة عن العمل في‬ ‫اإلتفاقية هو خلق فرص عمل قص ير‬ ‫ة األجل للعمالة غير الماهر‬ ‫المناطق المستهدفة على مستوى الجمهورية ‪ ،‬بإستخدام آليات اإلستهداف المختلفة ‪ ،‬حيث سيتم التعاون و‬ ‫‪ ،‬باإلضافة إلى‬ ‫زر‬ ‫ة التعليم‬ ‫ي – وا‬‫ة الر‬ ‫زر‬ ‫زر‬ ‫ة اإلسكان – و ا‬ ‫زر‬ ‫ات المعنية مثل ‪ - :‬و ا‬ ‫التنسيق مع بعض الو ا‬ ‫المجلس القومي للسكان و الجمعيات األهلية‪.‬‬ ‫ام بإشتر‬ ‫اطات البنك الدولي‬ ‫ام بإشتر‬ ‫اطات جهاز البيئة ‪ ،‬وكذا اإللتز‬ ‫كما أشار سيادته إلى أن أهمية اإللتز‬ ‫‪‬‬ ‫ع يحتوي على مكونين رئيسيين و هما ‪:‬‬‫للسالمة البيئية ‪ ،‬وأوضح أن المشرو‬ ‫عية كثيفة العمالة ‪ ،‬والذي يتفر‬ ‫ع إلى ‪ 01‬قطاعات رئيسية ينفذها الصندوق بالتعاون مع‬ ‫‪ .0‬مكون مشروعات فر‬ ‫الجمعيات األهلية‪.‬بإجمالي ‪ 091‬مليون دو‬ ‫الر أمريكي و يضم هذا المكون مجاالن أساسيان ‪:‬‬ ‫أ‪ .‬مشروعات البنية األساسية كثيفة العمالة ‪.‬‬ ‫ب‪ .‬مشروعات تشغيل الشباب في مبادر‬ ‫ات لتوفير الخدمات اإلجتماعية ‪.‬‬ ‫ع و المتابعة و التقييم و المر‬ ‫اجعة ( الدعم الفني و المؤسسي ) ‪ ،‬و إن كان هذين‬ ‫‪ .7‬مكون يختص بإدا ر‬ ‫ة المشرو‬ ‫المكونين في مضمونهم يصبان في مكون واحد أساسي و هو تشغيل العمالة الكثيفة ‪ ،‬مع مر‬ ‫اعاة البعد البيئي و‬ ‫اإلجتماعي ‪.‬‬ ‫ثانيا ‪ :‬قام الدكتور ‪ /‬وليد درويش بالتحدث تفصيال عن النقاط التالية ‪:‬‬ ‫إطار عمل التصنيف و التقييم البيئي و االجتماعي ‪:‬‬ ‫ع‪.‬‬‫الهدف من المشرو‬ ‫‪-‬‬ ‫ع‪.‬‬ ‫التأثير‬ ‫ات البيئية اإليجابية للمشرو‬ ‫‪-‬‬ ‫ع‪.‬‬ ‫التأثير‬ ‫ات البيئية السلبية للمشرو‬ ‫‪-‬‬ ‫اإللتز‬ ‫ام بسياسات السالمة الخاصة بالبنك الدولي ‪.‬‬ ‫‪-‬‬ ‫دليل إجر‬ ‫اءات التقييم الفني الخاص بالبنك الدولي رقم ‪. OP 4.01‬‬ ‫‪-‬‬ ‫دليل إجر‬ ‫اءات السالمة البيئية بالبنك الدولي ‪. OP 8.00‬‬ ‫‪-‬‬ ‫ع‬ ‫اءات الفحص البيئي و اإلجتماعي و التأثير‬ ‫ات البيئية و اإلجتماعية لتحديد التصنيف الخاص لكل مشرو‬ ‫إجر‬ ‫‪-‬‬ ‫عي‪.‬‬‫فر‬ ‫التصنيف البيئي وفقاُ لنظم البنك الدولي ( ب و ج ) وجهاز شئون البيئة‪.‬‬ ‫‪-‬‬ ‫‪27‬‬ ‫عية و هي كالتالي ‪:‬‬‫الخطوات الالزمة لتطبيق السالمة البيئية للمشروعات الفر‬ ‫‪ .0‬التصنيف البيئي للمشروعات‪.‬‬ ‫‪ .7‬مر‬ ‫اجعة الفحص البيئي بمعرفة البنك الدولي ‪.‬‬ ‫ع‪.‬‬ ‫‪ .3‬إعداد مستندات السالمة البيئية و اإلستشار‬ ‫ات و اإلعالن عن المشرو‬ ‫اجعة و إعتماد وثائق إجر‬ ‫اءات السالمة البيئية ‪.‬‬ ‫‪ .4‬مر‬ ‫‪ .5‬تنفيذ أعمال اإلشر‬ ‫اف و المتابعة و التقييم ‪.‬‬ ‫ر قام الدكتور ‪ /‬وليد درويش بتوضيح مسئوليات إعداد الفحص البيئي و إجر‬ ‫اءات تخفيف األثر البيئي‬ ‫‪ -‬وأخي اً‬ ‫ات و متابعة تنفيذ إطار عمل إجر‬ ‫اءات السالمة البيئية ‪.‬‬ ‫عية ‪ ،‬و كذا بناء القدر‬‫للمشروعات الفر‬ ‫ع ‪،‬واجر‬ ‫اءاته ‪ ،‬و قد‬ ‫ثالثا‪ :‬تم فتح باب النقاش و األسئلة المختلفة من السادة الحضور لإلستفسار عن طبيعة المشرو‬ ‫قام بالرد على هذه اإلستفسار‬ ‫ات كل من المهندس ‪ /‬مدحت مسعود ‪ ،‬و الدكتور ‪ /‬وليد درويش ‪ ،‬و جاءت هذه‬ ‫األسئلة على النحو التالي ‪:‬‬ ‫‪ .0‬هل العمالة التي تهدف اإلتفاقية إلى تشغيلهم في تلك المشروعات دائمة أم مؤقتة ؟‬ ‫ع " البرنامج العاجل لتشغيل العمالة الكثيفة " و الذي يشير إلى أنها عمالة‬‫‪ -‬أجاب المهندس ‪ /‬مدحت بأن إسم المشرو‬ ‫ع هو توفير فرص عمالة مؤقته ‪ ،‬وبصفة عاجلة ليتواكب ذلك مع الظروف و‬‫مؤقتة ‪ ،‬و أن الهدف التنموي للمشرو‬ ‫الحالة اإلقتصادية الر‬ ‫اهنة‪.‬‬ ‫ة البيئة ‪ ،‬فلماذا ال يضع لنا اإلشتر‬ ‫اطات البيئية‬ ‫ار‬‫‪ .2‬يوجد في جمهورية مصر العربية جهاز لشئون البيئة تابع لوز‬ ‫؟‬ ‫‪ -‬أجاب الدكتور ‪ /‬وليد على هذا السؤال بأننا نلتزم بإشتر‬ ‫اطات جهاز شئون البيئة ‪ ،‬وحيث أن البنك الدولي هو الجهة‬ ‫تزم بإشتر‬ ‫اطاتهم للسالمة البيئية ‪.‬‬ ‫المانحة ‪ ،‬فيجب أيض ً‬ ‫ا اإلل ا‬ ‫‪ .3‬ما هي معايير اختيار الجمعيات ؟‬ ‫‪ -‬أجاب المهندس ‪ /‬مدحت أن الجمعيات سوف تتقدم بأور‬ ‫اقها ثم يتم عمل تقييم للجمعيات تتم على أساس عدة معايير‬ ‫ي و الجمعية‬ ‫ات للجمعية – قدر‬ ‫ات الجمعية – الجهاز اإلدار‬ ‫منها على سبيل المثال ال الحصر ‪ - :‬سابقة الخبر‬ ‫ى لمناقشة أسس التقييم‬‫العمومية ‪ ،‬ثم على أساس التقييم يتم إختيار الجمعية المؤهلة ‪ ،‬و لكن هناك جلسات أخر‬ ‫بشكل مفصل ‪.‬‬ ‫‪28‬‬ ‫ع ( أولويات أم إحتياجات ) ؟ و ما هو ضمان‬‫‪ .4‬على أي أساس يتم إختيار المحافظات المنفذة للمشرو‬ ‫ى)؟‬ ‫ار المشكالت البيئية مر‬ ‫ة أخر‬ ‫اإلستمر‬ ‫ارية ( أي عدم تكر‬ ‫‪ -‬إجاب على هذا السؤال المهندس ‪ /‬مدحت قائال‬ ‫ً أن قائمة المشروعات مبدئية و ليست نهائية و أن توزيع المحافظات‬ ‫ً مبدئي و ليس نهائي طبقاً لخريطة اإلستهداف الجغر‬ ‫افي للفقر ‪ ،‬أما عن تحديد األولويات و اإلحتياجات‬ ‫فيها أيضا‬ ‫فإن الصندوق اإلجتماعي في كافة مشروعاته يعتمد في تحديد األولويات على مصدرين أساسين وهما ‪:‬‬ ‫ى هي التي تحدد احتياجاتها الفعلية من خالل البحث ‪.‬‬‫أ‪ .‬الجمعيات األهلية بالمحافظات و القر‬ ‫زر‬ ‫ات‬ ‫ب‪ .‬هناك بعض اإلحتياجات التي لديها صبغة فنية والتي لها هدف قومي والتي نعتمد في تحديدها على الو ا‬ ‫ي – اإلسكان – التعليم ‪ ...‬ألخ ) ‪.‬‬ ‫زر‬ ‫ة الر‬ ‫المعنية ( مثل و ا‬ ‫ى فقط ؟‬‫‪ .5‬هل اإلختيار يتم عن طريق المجاالت أم المشروعات ؟ و هل التطوير يشمل العشوائيات أم القر‬ ‫ع لتشغيل الشباب ‪ ،‬ويتم‬‫ح ألي جمعية تتقدم بمشرو‬‫ورداً على هذا التساؤل أفاد المهندس ‪ /‬مدحت بأن المجال مفتو‬ ‫اإلختيار على أساس اإلعتبار‬ ‫ات البيئية و عدد العمالة ‪ ،‬و هناك مشروعات لتشغيل الشباب في المناطق الحضرية ‪،‬‬ ‫وأيضاً تشغيل الشباب في المناطق الريفية ‪ ،‬وأضاف دكتور‪ /‬وليد بأن الصندوق اإلجتماعي للتنمية يتعاون مع‬ ‫صندوق تطوير العشوائيات وبخاصة فى تطوير األسواق العشوائية‬ ‫‪. -‬‬ ‫‪ .6‬هل لتصنيفات المشروعات ( ب أو ج ) سقف تمويلي باإلتفاقية ؟‬ ‫‪ -‬أجاب المهندس ‪ /‬مدحت بأنه من الناحية البيئية أو اإلجتماعية ال يوجد سقف تمويلي ‪ ،‬و لكن من جهة التعاقدات‬ ‫ة‪،‬و‬ ‫ال تطلب وقت طويل للتنفيذ ‪ ،‬و تحتاج‬ ‫فإن هناك بعض اإلشتر‬ ‫اطات التي تضمن أن تكون المشروعات صغير‬ ‫ى في التنفيذ وذلك تشجيعاً لصغار المقاولين ‪.‬‬ ‫ال تتطلب مهار‬ ‫ات كبر‬ ‫عماله كثيفة ‪ ،‬و‬ ‫‪ .2‬متى نتوقع بداية التطبيق لهذه اإلتفاقية ؟‬ ‫ع جاهز‬ ‫ة و سيتم التوقيع عليها مع الحكومة خالل‬ ‫‪ -‬رداً على هذا التساؤل أجاب المهندس ‪ /‬مدحت أن وثيقة المشرو‬ ‫شهر ‪ 5‬أو ‪ ، 6‬وطبقاً لإلجر‬ ‫اءات يتم عرضها على مجلس الشعب إلعتمادها ‪ ،‬ثم البدء في التنفيذ خالل شهر‬ ‫سبتمبر المقبل إنشاء اهلل ‪ ،‬أما فيما يخص تأهيل الجمعيات سوف يتم التنسيق مع البنك الدولي بالبدء في التأهيل‬ ‫من الشهر القادم ‪ ،‬و ذلك عن طريق تحديث قائمة الجمعيات الموجودة لدينا و البدء في عمليات التقييم للجمعيات ‪،‬‬ ‫حتى نتمكن من البدء سريعاً فور الحصول على التمويل من البنك الدولي‪.‬‬ ‫‪29‬‬ ‫ع مع البنك الدولي اشتر‬ ‫اط وجود كل‬ ‫‪ -‬و في نهاية الندوة أشار الدكتور ‪ /‬وليد درويش عن أن إحدى مز‬ ‫ايا المشرو‬ ‫غب في متابعة تلك اإلصدار‬ ‫ات أن يقوم‬ ‫ع على الموقع اإللكتروني للصندوق ‪ ،‬وعلى كل من ير‬ ‫إصدار‬ ‫ات المشرو‬ ‫بالدخول إلى الموقع اإللكتروني للصندوق لإلطالع على اإلصدار‬ ‫ات أوال بأول ‪.‬‬ ‫‪30‬‬ ‫إطار عمل التصنيف والتقييم البيئي واالجتماعي‬ ‫البرنامج العاجل للتشغيل العام كثيف العمالة‬ ‫‪‬‬ ‫‪‬‬ ‫‪31‬‬  32 OP 4.01 OP 8.00 ESSAF . . . . . 33 - - - 34 - - o o o 35 - -    36 - -      37 ‫بعض الصور الفوتوغرافية الخاصة بندوة اإلفصاح‬ ‫إلطار عمل التصنيف والتقييم البيئي واالجتماعي‬ ‫البرنامج العاجل للتشغيل كثيف العمالة‬ ‫‪ 72‬مارس ‪7107‬‬ ‫‪38‬‬ 39