A'v -S3 7c-'> . Document or The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY MICROFICIIE COPY Repo No.8767-BR Report No. 8T7f7-13R VIETTI, J./ X39338 / 17165/ LAIIE STAFF APPRAISAL REPORT BRAZIL HYDROCARBON TRANSPORT AND PROCESSING PROJECT JUNE 6, 1991 Energy and- Industry Operations Division Country Department I Latin America and the Caribbean !,ht doment has a resiced mad may be uwd by oesly In the pedonmnce of &k odAutie Its c_mft way out edwise be diblosed Wdd Bak toIo. CURRENCY EOgIVmE= currency Unit a Cruseiro (Cr$) US$1 a Crz$234 (March 1991) PETRODUS' FISCAL YEAR January 1 - December 31 WEIGHTS AND MEASURES 1 Metric Ton (m ton) - 1,000 Kilogras (kg) 1 Metric Ton (m ton) - 2,204 Pounds (lb) 1 Meter (m) - 3.28 Feet (ft) 1 Kilometer (km) - 0.62 Miles (mi) 1 Cubic meter (3) - 35.3 Cubic Feet (cu ft) 1 Barrel (Bbl) - Q.159 Cubic Moter 1 Barrel (Bbl) = 42 US Gallons 1 Metric Ton of Oil (API 300) - 7.19 Barrels 1 Kilocalorie (kcal) = 3.97 British Thermal Units (BTU) 1 Ton of Oil Equiv. (t.o.e.) - 10 Million kcal (39.7 million BTU) b/d - Barrels per day m/d - cubic meter per day I Cubic Foot of Natural Gas - 950 BTU 1 Kilowatt-hour a 3,411 BTU FOR OMCIAL USE ONLY ACO Automation component sCM Billion Cubic w-oer BNDES National Bank for Social and Econ0mic Dovelopent BPD larels per day BR PETROSRS Distribuidora, S.A.-BR CfP National Petroleum Council CO1GMA Gas Company of Sao Paulo cvM Comissao do Valores Mobiliares DNC Drtmnt of Combustible Fuels ELETROERAS Centrals Bletricas Brasilelras S.A. E815 Energy Strategy and Issues Study HDT Hydrotreatment Plant ICa Internatlonal Competitive Bidding IDC Interest Dining Construction LCB Local Competitive Biddlng LPG Liquid Petroleum Gas LRMC Long-Run Marginal Cost IDWT Millions dead weight tons mmTU Million STU MIC Ministry of Industry and Commerce Kos3 Ministry of Economy 1(01 Minlstry of Infrastructure PASEP Publlc Employee. Fiancial Reserve Fund P1SP Petroleum sector *action Plan PCU Project Coordinating Unit PETROD8A8 Petrolso Braslledro 5.A. PLANGAS National Plan on Natural Gas REDUC Duque de Caxias Refinery REPAR Parana Reflnery REPLAN Planalto Refinery RELAX Landulpho Alves Mataripe Refinery REVAP Vale do Paraiba Refinery RIMA Environmental Impact Study RPBC PresLdente Bernardes Refinery at Cubatao SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acqulsition SEST Secretariat of State Enterprises SNE National Secretariat of Snergy TEMADRE Termiual Madre de Deus TOE Tons of t11 Equivalent This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in th pforfanne of ther official duties. Its contents may not otherwbe be dbclosed without World Dank authorization. (I) TME 8am= sE 3. UnergyResources .. .. .... ....... 1 C. Energ Deand and Supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 D. * nerg sector Investments . . . . . . . . . * 2 a . Energ Pricing ... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 r. snerg Conservation. ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 0. Envirnna and Social Aspects . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 H. Institutioawl Structure ........0 0* *0 a........ I * The Refinery Subsector . . . . . . . . . . . . * * * . . . J. Hdocarbon Transport System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 R. The NaturalGa"subsector 0e0*00 .......... ....... 7 L. Goveresnt Policy in the Energy Sector . . . . . . . . . . S M. The Bank's Role, and Strategy * (II) TUB RROUING AGCY - PETRoDUAS A. Co ratectivit . ... ................... .. 1 S. Onership,K g ---ntand 0rganLsation ............ . 12 C.Costing,AccountLng andAudt . . . .. .................... 13 V* Financal Performance . . .. *. * . * .. o. . * o* * * 9 9 14 z. Developmet Scenarios Performance Projections . . . . . . 17 This report i. based upon the findings of project preparation and appraisal missions that visited urail in September and December 1989 and August 199. The issioons comprise Messrs./go. Dates (PrinciPal Economist), Darata (Sr. Industrial Pollution Specialist), Dick (Sr. Transport Economist), Irsnmuty(Sr. Industrial Specialist), M.IhLI (Unit Chio), RistorcelLi, Xuniga (Consultants), Sheehan (FILnancial Analyst) and Markus (Sr. Financial Analyst) - Task manager (until December 1990)t aSobotka (Research Assistant). softly and Peres (Omns8ltants), assistod in the project prspa.ation. Messrs. Vitti (Str. FiLancLial Analyst), Task Manager (since AprLi 1991), and Waldrop (Financial Analyst) also partLclpated ln the report. a* . .iS8 . . . . ........ . . . 19 S. TraCsport Codponent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 (3) Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 (4) Procurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 (5) Technical and Financial Justification . . . . . . . . . 22 C. Procseing CoMPonent .* 0 0 * * .......................... 23 (1) Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 (2) cost and linancing . ........................ 25 (3) implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 (4) Procure_mt . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... .. .. .. ... 26 (5) Technical and Financial Justification . . . . . . . . . 26 D. safety and Ecology * . . .*. .* . ... . e* . . . . . . . . 27 S. Disbursements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 F. Monitoring, Coordination, and Reporting Requirements . . . 29 G. gconmic Evaluation .............* ....v 29 B. Project Risks .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 I. Project Files . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 (IV) LaGFN REAMED AND RQMME ION . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 1.01 Gross Domestic Production and Consumption of Primary Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 1.02 Hydrocarbon Taxation .......... ..... . ... . . . . . . . . . 36 1.03 nerrgy Conservation .. . ... ....... 37 1.04 Petroleum Transport . .......... .... 39 2.01 PBTRO8 OOrggnixatLon Chart ....... .. . . 42 2.02 Costing System - Timtable for Upgrading . . . . . . . . . . 44 2.03 PTRBRAs Financial Statments, Historic and Projected . . . 45 2.04 Notes and Assumptions for PETROBMS Financial Projections . 48 2.05 Petroleum Sector Action Plan (PASP) ........... . 52 3.01 Detailed Project Description ...; .... ..... 53 3.02 Transport Planning - Draft Term of Rferene. 60 3.03 Detaled Project Cost tctCst.u. ates.... 62 3.04 Procurment Arr nts . . . . . . . .*....G.s. . . . . 68 3.05 Project Implementation organigram . . . . . . . . . . . 71 3.06 lmplementation Timetable ............ *.. 72 3.07 Industrial safety Draft Toms of Reference . . . . . . 74 - Risk Asseesment S ..............a . 74 - Risk Aessment Training ............... 76 -Risk Assessment Cubatao ***...** .**.**. 78 - NIobilo nvironental Monitoring . .......... . 81 -odor Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 -ZnvironmntalanagentTcaining ... . . . ..... 86 - iii. - 3.08 Loan Dibur mntSchedulu e.......... ....... 90 3.09 Disburseamnt CatogoiJes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 3.10 RApOrting sqlrueMsntg . . . . . . . . . ., 92 3.11 Project ZconomioEvaluation . . . . . . . 96 3.12 Documnts and Data Available in the Project Files . . . . . 110 muE lIBD no. 21867 - iv - MXRBQ LOAM ZOhID AND~3C nWiG n AM AUM REPORT Borrowers Petrolso DrAsileiro S.A. (PITROMS) SUWrsa= Federative Republic of Brazil smgms US$260.0 million quivalent Tornos Fifteen years, including a five year grace period, at the Bank's stanoard variable interest rate. AMU cAMr PETROMRA Irosect Obiect$t* and D-scrltlo,ns The main objectives are to: (A) enhance natural gas utilization as a substitute for other sources of energy with higher economic and environmental costa; (ii) reduce the distribution costs of petroleum products by substituting pipelines for road and water transport; (iii) reduce petroleum product losses through processing optimization; and (iv) reduce environmental costs and safety risks in petroleum product transport and refining. In supporting these aias, the project would include a Transport Ctgonent consisting oft (i) a pipelLne and related facilities to deliver natural gas to Sao Paulo; (ii) three pipelines (with tank and pump stations) to deliver liquid products more economically to distribution centersl (iii) engineering design; environmental impact studLes; and training in pipelLne operations and transportation planning. UtgMuJngu Commonnt consistlng of: (i) a Hydrotreatment Plant at the Cubatao refinery to increase productivity, upgrade the quality of petroleum products, and reduce product losses; (ii) automation studies focusing on optimization of proces and centralLsed control for loading, storage and offsite facilities and, on the basis of these studies, an action program in three refineris; (LiiL) an industrial safety and envlronmental program includings (a) development of norms for risk assessmnt, hazardous waste handlLng and relevant training; (b) co-prehensive rlsk evaluation at the Cubatao reftnery; (a) acquLiftion of aLr qualLty monLtorLng moble laboratorieas and (d) traLLng to help LnstitutLonalLg safoty and envlronmental awrnness. Prelect Benefits: The quantfiable benefts are oxpected to genorate an econcmic rate of "turn (3RR) of about 21% for tho trawport component, and 23% for tho hydrotrteatment plant. The project will also produce conider able safety and environmental benefits such as lower levels of air and water contaminatlon, and improved oafety standardo and publlc health. Proiect RLskes Ther" aro no serious technical or gas reservo rLsks assocLated wlth the project. The prLmary rLsk regarding the hydrotreatment plant ia related to Laternational petroleum prLeeg however, sensLtivity an4lyses conflrm the robustness of the component. - vL - HYDROcARB TRANSPOJI? AIM PROCSS IO PJELMO ZROJEC COSTS MN FINANING PA (US$ million 1) Local EQreLUE =Al A. :stfimated COsts (1) ZranDga G2ompnt Materials 28.2 31.5 59.7 Works 26.7 101.6 128.3 Equipment 19.4 5.0 24.4 Engineering Design 14.1 - 14.1 TrainLng and Planning - 1.0 1.0 Land and Easements 1.2 - 1.2 Total Base Cost 89.6 139.1 228.7 Working Capital 5.0 5.0 10.0 Physical Contingencies 16.1 12.0 28.1 Price Contingencies 22.6 L18.2 40. Sub Total 133.3 174.3 307.6 Interest During Construction - 27.1 27.1 Taxes and Duties 27.4 - 27.4 Financing Requirement 160.7 2Q1.4 5§. (2) PMc9ssJOgq Cmpnent (a) Hvdrotreatment Plant iLcense and Engineering 6.5 1.6 8.1 Equipment, Materials, 12.0 65.4 77.4 Spares, Catalyst & Chemicals Works 48.2 - 48.2 Dlgital Control 0.4 1.0 1.4 Project Management 14.9 - 14.9 Start-up 2.9 - 2.9 Industrial/Safety Program 0.2 2.8 3.0 TrainLng 0.6 - 0.6 Total Base Cost 85.7 70.8 156.5 Physical Contingencies 14.0 a.2 23.2 Price contingencies 21.5 .14.2 35.7 Sub Total 121.2 94.2 21S.4 Interest During Construction - 14.0 14.0 Taxes and Duties .2 - 18.2 Financing Requirement 139.4 10.2 242L6 -vii - (b) AUUM.RD zam Diagnostic study 0.5 0.9 1.4 Basic Zkginearing & Design 0.6 1.S 2.3 Instrumentation 0.6 2.3 2.9 Training 0.4 0.1 0.5 installation, Commissioning 0.6 1.0 1.6 Total Base Cost 2.9 S.8 8.7 Physical Contingencies 0.2 0.4 0.6 Price Contingencies 0A4 0 5 0A Sub Total 3.5 6.7 10.2 Interest During Construction - 1.0 1.0 Taxes and Duties LZ - -.a Financing Requiremsnts B. Total Proiect Base Cost 178.2 215.7 393.9 Physical Contingencies 30.3 21.6 51.9 Price Contingencies 44.5 32.9 77.4 Working Capital ,5.Q -.O 1. Sub Total 258.0 275.2 533.2 Interest During Construction - 42.1 42.1 Taxes and Duties 47.8 - 42. Total Financing Requirments AQLEI "3L..J Financina Plan PETROBRAS 227.0 136.1 363.1 IBRD 78.8 111.2 260.0 TOTAL 3QL0 "l8 623.1 1J. Prices as of March 1991. stimated Disburementt Bank Fiscal Year 1992 1993 1924 1 99S Annual 99.4 127.9 29.7 3.0 Cumulative 99.4 227.3 257.0 260.0 - vUJ. - Rate -of at&= ?raniport componet about 21% Hydroatetnt Plant bout 23% sYDSC"OCAT ^l PROS8|8S PROJec 1 Is I. TRANSPORT CO1PONN3T material 2S.8 5.0 3.0 44.0 2 77.8 (25.8) (5.0) (3.0) (-) (33.8) Works 96.2 - 68.0 2 164.2 (96.2) X-) (-) (96.2) Equipmmit 18.9 3.0 11.00 32.9 (18.9) (3.0) - (21.9) Ingineering Design and supervision - - 19.7 2 19.7 Training & Planning - 1.3 1.3 :~~) (~~~) (1.3) 3 (1.3) Land a Eas_ments - - 1.7 2 1.7 (-) ( -) (-) (-) Working Capltal - 10.0 2 10.0 Total Transport Component 140.9 5.0 6.0 1SS.7 307.6 ( 409) (5.0) L6.01 1.3J) 1 153jZ) -~~ ~ ~ ~ 69 - PA"e 2 of 3 I8 IS. 931133K? COMPONENT A. HDT Unit License and knowhow - - 2.3 2 2.3 Baic & Detailed - - 9.1 2 9.1 Ungineering (-) (-) (-) (-) Equipment, Materials, 75.8 5.0 2.6 11.1 2 94.5 Parts (CIr/ex-worku) (75.8) (5.0) (2.6) (-) (83.4) Catalysts & Chemicals 4.2 - - 4.2 (4.2) (-) C-) (4.2) Training - - 0.8 0.8 Training C..) (-) (0.8) 3 (0.8) Industrial Works 8.8 - 63.9 2 72.7 (8.8) (-) (-) (8.8) DDC Syste - - 2.0 2 2.0 Inland Freight, Startup, - - 26.82 26.8 Proj. Mgt. f-J .1-1 Subtotal 88.8 5.0 2.6 116.0 212.4 (IAM) (5.0) (2L) (MAU (2.IL) B. A2Q RXMam Diagnostic Study - - 1.4 1.4 (-) (-) _ _ -70- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - Pae 3 of 3 Engineering a Design - - 2.7 2.7 {-) I-) ~~~(2.7) ( 2.7) Hardware, Software - - 3.4 3.4 Installation (-) -) (3.4) (3.4) Training - _ 0.5 0.5 (_) (-) ~~~(O.s) 3 (0.5) Installation, - - 2.2 2.2 Commiissoning (_) L-I x J-f subtotal - 10.2 10.2 I-) (-) (6.6) (6.6) C. Industrial Safety - - 3.0 3.0 Proaram (-) (-) (3.0) 3 (3.0 - a Total Industrial Component 88.8 5.0 2.6 129.2 225.6 (88.8) (5.0) (2.6) (10.4) (106.8) inum - 2MM mw 1II. TOTAL PROJECT 230.0 10 8.6 284.6 533.2 (230.0) (10.0) (8.6) (11.4) (260.0) j/ Amts include contingencies. Amounts in parentheses represent those proposed for Bank finanaing. 2/ According to PETRODRAS procurement rules. 3/ Hiring of consultants, according to Bank CuLde1Lnes. Igug=s PSTRODRAS, Bank mLssion, August 1990. BRAZIL HYDROCARBON TRANSPORT AND PROCESSING PROJECT Project Implementation Organigram Refinery Component project General Desig and Planndg and .mr t Catol >e llnager Job 8t Adinsratio P1#D8 andw SNP&W~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Le. |Te Studies. Coatcti and |retin per 5113* SR=I DIMgO SE?P Constict. Z rect. | Coutract. & amt. Section I Section 2 So= I 51M 2 BUZIL IYIDOCARBON TRRSPORT AND PROCESSING PROJECT DUOUMMTION TIMETABILE Transport Component 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Basic Design Detailed Design and Route Surveys Materials Procurement and Delivery Works Procurement Pipeline Construction Statims and TemnXalse Testing and CoImissioni - Training Sources PETOBRAS, Bank Mission, April 1990 e0w t o0 BRAZIL YDROCARBO TRANSPORT AND PROCESSIN PROJCT IDPLEKEN?ATION TIHETABLE HDT Component 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Xldro_en Treatment Unit Detailed Engineering - Critical Equipment - Other Equipment Electrical nastrument. bdroen- Generation Detailed Engineering - Critical Equipment Other Equipment Piping - - Electrical Instrument. DA unit Detailed Engineerlng - Critical Equipment - Other Equipment Piping - - Electrical Instrument. Sulohur Recovery Detailed Engineering Critical Equipment - Other Equipment - Electrical Instrument. Offeites ltilitiss & Int'erconn. Cooling Water System - Elecllnstrusent. System Effluent Treatment/ - Disposal System Flare System CGn_ral - Civil Works U - 74 - ANNEX 3.07 Pag. 1 of 16 RYRC~ARWON TRANPOR AND PROCESIE PROJECT Industrial Safety DRAFT TERMS OF REFERENCE TsRoa RISK ASSESSMENT TEA Objective: To provide PETROBRAS with in-house capability to assure that all their refinery unit operations are designed and operated in a manner which mi4naizes hazards and risks to their omn workers and populations residing In adjacent areas. Rationale: Petroleum and petrochemical products are for the most part classified as hazardous. They are generally flamable, in some cases (e.g., acetylene), explosive and/or highly reactive. Many petroleum based materials are toxic as well both in a chronic and an acute sense. With the large quantities of these materials in storage or being processed at a given time in most PETROBRAS refineries, an in-house capability to actually assess their safety and offer modifications to Improve operatlons, particularly in the older, larger installations (e.g., Cubatao) and to minimlze risk, represents a vital corporate function. Work Proaram: A corporate group (within DESEMA) is to be created whlch will consist of six staff members thoroughly trained in the fundamentals and methodologies for risk assessment and hazard analysis in five specialized areas. In addition, three staff members will be generally available for developing new procedures for rlsk and hazards analysis unique to PETROBRAS refinery operations. The following specalilzed staff and skills are requiredt Four (4) professlonals each trained in hazard and risk aspects oft -Petroleum products storage -Petroleum refining -Petrochemicals manufacture One professlonal trained in hazardous materlals management (handling disposal, etc.) One professional trained In toxicological risk assessment Three (3) professionals with ln-depth training on the latest procedures In risk analysis as applied to refinery operations The group will be responsible for design reviews, establishing safety programs, preparing guidelines and standards at existLig fsaclitLes (startlng with Cubatao) and act as coordLiators with State and Federal authorities In -75 - ANNEX 3.07 Page 2 of 16 interpreting rules and regulations as they apply to various PETROBRAS refining activities, and to new projects. The group should also be involved with community awareness and education programs and deal with technical aspects of inquiries, e.g., from camnunity representatives. They should be responsible for setting design standards for community warning/response systems, as well as enhancing the training of local authorities (firefighters, police, medical and hospital emergency staff) in proper procedures. Training Requirements: In order to establish an effective team, it will be necessary to provide appropriate training to select PETROBRAS staff (see Terms of Reference - Risk Assessment Training). The program will consist of six short term study tours and three scholarships for overseas university study in risk assessmeAt. Members of this group will be expected to actively participate in the risk assessment study for the Cubatao refinery (see TOR for Cubatao risk assessment). Source: Bank Mission, March 1990 76 - ANNEX 3.07 Page 3 of 16 DRAFT TEOMS OF REFERENCE RISK ASSESSMENT TRAINING 1. Obiective: Establish a special Risk Assessment Unit within PETROBRAS so that the potential hazards of existing and proposed (e.g., hydrotreatment) facilities at Cubatao can be addressed and PETROBRAS trained staff can actively participate in the Cubatao Risk Assessment Study. PHASE I: SHORT TERM TRAINING Six (6) 2ETROBRAS staff will attend specialized training in hazard evaluations and risk assessment in areas considered critical at Cubatao. Courses will consist of generalized training in the methods of analysis and the specialized computer programs available for hazard analysis, risk assessment and consequence evaluations, as well as data requirements and data collection programs (estimated times 1.5 months). Subsequent to completion of the course effort, students will then spend one to three months (see below) at actual refinery locations to work with operational technical personnel, in on-the-job training specifically focussed on hazards and risk reductions in refinery and petrochemical operations: Four professional will each spend one month at refinery installations to study hazard and risk espects in e ach of the following topical areas (total of three months per person). -Petroleum products storage -Petroleum refining -Petrochemicals manufacture One professional will spend one month at a refinery installation to study: Hazardous materials management One professional will spend one month at a refinery installation to study: Toxicological risk assessment - 77 - Pao 4 of 16 PEAS li-LOWGUN2&UN Three selected PETROBRAS staff members will be sent abroad to obtain advanced (Master or equivalent) university degrees in the field of industrial risk assessment (one year each). Sources Bank Mission, March 1990 - 78 - UW.p7 Pag8 5 of 16 DRAFT TIEMS OF RIISR ASSESSMENT CUAkTAO REFINERY 1. Objectivet To evaluate in detail, with consultancy assistance, the hazard and risk potential of the PETROBRAS refinery/petrochemucal complex of Cubatao and prepare a detailed program of improvements. 2. Rationale: The Cubatao refinery has been subject to some recent mishaps which suggest that a rigorous risk evaluation would lead to substantial improvements in refinery operating efficiencies, sad increase the level of safety of both employees and local residents. MEASE I: PRELIMINARY HAZARD IDENTIFICATION In conjunction with staff of the (newly created) Risk Assessment Unit, the consultant will conduct a preliminary hazard identification survey of the Cubstso rofinery, provide in detail the risk/hazard methodologies recosuended for use in this and subsequent phases of the project. Major process element8 w'11 be evaluated in terms of their design para-eters, actual operating conditions, and reliability history. It is anticipated that this effort will be closely coordinated with the automatic process control study also being supported as part of the Bank-financed project. The study will also lay the foundation for the more detailed risk assessment of the Cubatao complex (estimated timet two man-months). In this phase, future PETROBRAS expansion and process modification plans for Cubatao (including the hydrotreater) are to be reviewed in order to determine any design constraints which may be necessary from a hasard/risk perspective. At the end of the first Phase, the consultant will present recommendations, for PETROBRAS' review and approval, to be used in Phsse It. PEASE II: DETAILED RISK ASSESSMENT A detailed risk analysis of the entire complex will be conducted. The analysis will cover all process elements of the refinery and will examine in detail everything from deviations from good practice to quantitative hazard evaluations (consequence analysis).' The analysis will include all planned plant modiflcations and/or expansions. In carrying out the analysis, the consultant Is expected to work together with staff of the Risk Assessment Unit, considering them part of the overall technical team. This will provide PETROBRAS staff the opportunity to secure practical experience at their own facilities. Total estimated tinem 120 man-months. 'Detailed specifications of the model(s) to be used will be provided by the consultant. - 79 - Page 6 of 16 PImE III DEVELOPMENT OF A RISK REDUCTION PLAN Based on the accepted recomendation stemming from Phase II, a detailed program of hazard and risk reduction to the Cubatao complex is to be prepared. The program is to include, but not be limited tos -Improvements in operator practices-maintenance and operation -Critical process elements -Ider.ification of opportunities to reduce initiating events -Identification of opportunities to reduce probabilities and/or consequences of event sequences. Possible areas to be included in the program ares -Replacement of manual operations by automatic controls or vice versa -Changes in process conditions -Changes in processing, storage and/or transport equipment -Improved monitoring/warning system and emergency response preparedness (in plant and neighboring community) -Changes in plant layout The risk reduction scheme should be in the form of an action plan and is to be quantified to the greatest extent possible and cost estimates for each action are to be provided, together with a timetablc. Priorities are to be assigned to each of the proposed actions. (Estimated time: six man-months.) - Rn - AM= 3.07 7 of 16 3 2 03~~~ 0 . ~ ~ ~ ew. a a Souces M WO IIk Mlsalot t 90* ' B~~ ~ ~. 81 - AMEX 3.07 ta* 8 of 16 DRUFT TRWS OF REPSRENCE MILE EONV NTL tUITRI LNJBORATORY _OR SPECIAL STMMIES (INITIALLY) AS TE CUBATAO FUY 1. Obiective: To provide PETROBRAS with capability to collect full range of air quality data for specialized studies, Including support In Cubatao both for the odor evaluation and any environmental licensing requirements for the proposed hydrotreatment facility. 2. Ratlonale: Environmental Impact analysis as wvel as other specialixed environmental studies require extensive capability for monitoring air quality. Since the Cubatao area has had extremely serious industrial air pollution problems in the past, air quality monitoring is essential to bring the situation under control. As a matter of officiency, providing this capability in a mobilized unit will offer flexibility and reduce the costs of duplicating identical listrumentation at a number of sites. For acquiring the appropriate equipment and utilizing it in the most efficient manner the following work phases are considered necessarys PEASE I: REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL sTUDIESIPROGRAMS OF CENPES AND DEPIN TO DETEMNE MONITOR N1-G NEEDS AND SCHEDULING (One month) S * A detailed in-house review of environmental studiestmonitoring programs planned for the next five years should be conducted to determine the types of aeasur _ .ts to be made together with the time table(s) for the program. PRASE IIs DETERMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY EQUIPMENT NEEDS (One monthl 4. Based upon results of Phase I, the types of monitoring equipment needed for various air quality parameters will be specified. PHASE Ills DETAILED LABORATORY DESIGN AND EQUIPMENT PURCHASE (two months) 5. Detailed specifications will be prepared for the moblle laboratory including monAtoring equipment, special agents, specialized heat and humidity protection and utility support systems. The equipment will be selected, inter- *Ua, on the basis of its accuracy, cost, robustness, ease of repair, ready access to spare parts, and availability of suppliers technical support (repairs, calibration, consultation). - 62 - Page 9 of 16 .'w IV, PUhQA 8amV W&UG fo mth) 6. Upon delivery of the laboratorles, PEZTRORAS technical staff will be trzaad in the utilization, calibration, maintenance and simple repair of all equipwant. Sources Book Mission, March 1990. -83- Page 10 of 16 DRAFT TERMS OF REFERENCE ODOR EVALUATION AND CONTROL AT THE CUBATAO REFINERY 1. Objectives The purpose of th$s study is to determine the chief sources of odor at the Cubotao refinery and implement an effective program to eliminate the problem. 2. Rationale: PETROBRAS has made substantial progress eliminating pollution from air, water and hazardous wastes at Cubatao. Nevertheless, one of the most difficult problem remaining is that of odor control. This has proved to be rather elusive and a source of some friction with local communities. Protram Outlinet PHASE I With consultant assistance a survey based refinery-wide monitoring system to assess likely sources of odor will be developed. The system will include, but not be limited tos - Continuous in stack-monitoring throughout the refinery area. Parameters to be measured shall include, but not be limited to, organo-sulphur compounds, hydrogen sulfide, organo- nitzogen compounds, ammonia, phenols, non-methane hydrocarbons, and other likely odiferous pollutants common to refinery operations. - Continuous water qualitv monitoring of liouids with exvosed surfaces: (open flows, aeration ponds, etc.) for odor-causing pollutants (e.g., organo-sulphur, organo-nitrogen, oxy- organics, such as phenols, and inorganics such as sulfides, amonias, etc.) - Continuous ambient air quality monitorint for odor causing compounds noted above. Stations to be located at the refinery (including waste disposal sites) as well as residential areas. - Meteorological data collection it is anticipated that the system will be entirely automated with data collection reduction and storage completely computerized. Back-up recording systems are to be provided throughout. (Estimated time, three man-months). PHASE-IT Based on the accepted recomendation of Phase I, PETROBRAS will Implement a system and collect data for a period of at least one year. - 84 Page 11 of 16 PHASE III PETROBRAS will initiate a community awareness program where citizens of Cubotao will be apprised of the study. PETROBRAS will also develop a system of commaunity reporting, so that odor Incidents can be recorded (location of observer, tie of incident, description of odor, etc.). PHASE IV PETROBRAS with consultant support will review the data collected and correlate rssults with the lncidence information reported by Cubatao residents, in order to identify likely odor sources at the refinery. PHASE V A program of odor control will be prepared. The progrsm will identify the sources, specify equipment needed and preliminary cost estimates. Sources will be ordered in terms of priority (most likely cause, ..... least likely). PHASE VI The odor control program will be tmplem_nted in accordance with the priority schedule with a period of at least three months between successive installations. Sources PETROBRAS, Bank Mission, March 1990. NYROCARION TRARSPORT AND PROCESSING PROJBCT INDUSTRIAL SAFETY RISK EVALUATION AND CONStOL, CUTADAO REFINERY IHPLEMENTATION TIHETASLE b . 1, 1 tu I I SB| 2 * - ~so* few tl u..5er1 EpipaSOb Eel~~~~~~~~~~~ les Se t. 1t t 1 - 86 - Page 13 of 16 DRAF ThINS OP POLLUTION CONTROL. NAZARDOUS WASTE AND WN S UINRTAL TRAINING AND STY TOURS 1. Obiectives To provide PETROBRAS with an International perspective of how pollution, hazardous waste and environmental mau. ' -ent problems of refivary locations world-wide are addressed to provide usights into more effective techuology transfer. 2. Rationale: The relative isolation of PETROBRAS' environmental staff from the latest world developments and practices for pollution control, hazardous waste uanagement and nvirormental Impact analysis techniques in the petroleum refining Industry should be elIminated. Providing key staff members the opportunity to visit their counterparts and long-term study will allow them to acquire first hand knowledge on the state of the art for petroleumlpetrochemical processing pollution management. 3. Ayiroach: Specialized study tours will be conducted at several refinery locations world-wide (short term) where pollution control and hazardous waste management due to thetr particular nature, are advanced. Also, institutions specializing In environmental Impact analysis training will be utilized for the long term programs (e.g., several European and North American universities). Refineries at the following locations are considered typical (extnswive operations near major population centers): -Los Angeles, California -San Francisco Bay Area, California -New Orleans, Louisiana -Houston, Texas -Rotterdam, Netherlands In addition to refineries the study tours will also include visits to environmental authorities (e.g., USEPA and USEPA research centers, selected State Environmental Authorities)' trade organizations (American Institute of Chemical Engineers, American Petroleum Inst1;ute, Institut Francais du Petrole) and major engineering firms specializing in refinery designs and/or pollution control. S. The study tours will be designed to address the following environmental issues of the petroleum/petrochemicals industry and which have been particularly applicable to the Cubatao complex: 'States where petroleum refininglpetrochemicals manufacture Is a sajor soctor, e.g., Texas, Loul8ianat California. Page 14 @f 16 -Air and water pollution coutrol methods -Haardous WastO management (including lead faming) -Air quality modelling -Air and water quality monitoring (analytical techniques) -Emergency response procedures in refin mies -Envirormental Impact assessenat -Ecotoxicoligy -Ground water recuperation EstiMated time involvement: Six staff members from th environmental and biotechnology division at CEEPES will participate in two short (one month) study tours (a) each consisting of three people. One group will travel to Europe, the other to USA. Another group of ten PETROBRAS staff members will be selected for ahort term, (b) (two months) study tours. From this groul., two will be from the Industry Department (DEPIN), five from the Environment Department (DESEKA) , and thre from the Environment Department of the Cubatao refinery. Finally, three candidates from DESENA will be choseA for the long term (one year) study program Ln environmental Impact assessment. 7. Scheduls: PHASE IZs Selction of Refinery location candidates (short term) Selection of long term training institutions (2 months) PHASE 11: Arcange technical aspects of touras contacts with orgsaniations and refinery personnel (one month/tour) PHASE Ills Travel arrangements (short term and long term) (one month) PHASE rVt Program Implementation Source: PETROBRAS, Bank Mission, March 1990. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~3 O - 88 - 'Ci 3.0.? WaTA N. s 16 XY~~IDEtO USSR $A 1OL=TOW SaNrmL. &AR WASTE AND Uov RN~TAL KAaWAGDM ST=D TMOUS ___MMTTA?ON TnETABZ PEASE1 2 3 4 . = : Weg S~. 2.. aO aZ * .ceece Socae: PETROB., Bank Mission Aupzat 1990 AZ UYDROCAIWONTRAWSPOW AND PROCESSINO PROJEC? INUSTRIAL SAFETY COMPONENT I*!NPLEHENTATION TIHETABLE nmVWA Iwe 2 w Iheri. USO; It * oAn0 -* 2LIL* A4. F ~~0wo sl Ot. o{s X * t I .00_ I,~~ ~ ~ , o 0 .0 .I S 0V a fit 0 -it] a .34 * 9.. iII*lbttto ie o b 4oc oaais "Wlw slmr - 91 - Pago I of I LOwpmugim nwamg In MiLlion US 133 Fiscal Year Disbursemnts Cumulatlve Dlsbur semnt and Ouartqr Undino In OU&Xt_ In Sept. 30, 1991 40.01 40.0 1S Dec. 31, 1991 21.1 61.1 24 March 31, 1992 18.1 79.2 30 June 30, 1992 20.2 99.4 38 rX .9z; Sept. 30, 1992 32.5 131.9 51 Dec. 31, 1992 i5.4 167.3 64 March 31, 1993 3S.2 202.5 78 June 30, 1993 24.8 227.3 87 YY 1994 Sept. 30, 1993 13.1 240.4 92 Dec. 31, 1993 7.2 247.6 95 Xach 31, 1994 4.9 252.5 97 June 30, 1994 4.5 257.0 99 ,PL1 Sept. 30, 1994 3.0 260.0 100 1 ncludes an Initial amount of US$20.0 million to establish the Special Accounts (US$10 million in local currency wlth Central ank,, and US$10 million vn forelgn exhange in oomrcial banks vuoutsiLde Dal. - 91 - 91~ ~~~~~~~~o Page 2. of 1 MYDROCARBON TIANSPORT AND PROCESSTNG PROJECT DISBURS4EMNT CATEGORIES Loan Allocated I of (EIpressed In Expenitures Cateatory Dollar Equivalent) to, be Financed (1) Goods under Part A of ) 1001 of local of the Projects ) expenditures a net of taxes 55.700,000) and 1002 of ) foreign 3 expenditures 3 (2) Civil works under Part A 96,200,000) of the Project ) (3) Goods under Part B.1 of 87,600,000) the Project ) (4) Industrial undoer Part 3.1 8,800.000) of the Project ) (5) Computer equipment, software 6,100,000) and engineeriAg under Part ) B.3 of the Project ) (6) Consultants' services and 5,600,000) training under Parts A and B ) TOTAL 260,000,000 - 92 - AIR=E 3. 10 Pago 1 of 4 BRAZIL HYDROCARBON TRANSPORT AND PROCESSING PROJECT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 1. The following information is to be reported from time to time in relation to the progress of work on the project and to the operations of PETROBRAS. 2. During the implementation of the project, quarterly reports covering: (a) Technical progress; (b) Cost estimates, expenditures and disbursements; (c) Comparisons with targeted action plans, e.g., training, review diagnostic studies, etc.; and (d) Consultants' work should be delivered to the Bank not later than one month after the end of each calendar quarter. 3. In addition, annual reports covering compliance with the loan conditions and targets should be submitted to the Bank not later than three months after the end of the fiscal year. 4. Finally, PETROBRAS will be required to prepare, not later than three months after the project completion date, a completion report summarising its the experience with the project and the lessons learned. 5. The following describes the reports in detail: QCurterly Technical Progress Reports 6. The reports should cover the following events: (a) physical work accomplished during the reporting period; (b) a comparison between the planned and actual progress; (c) changes, events or cunditions which would materially delay the implementation (d) changes in key personnel; (e) expected completion date. 7. Such progress reports shall concentrate on the main physical components of the project, broken down as follows: - 93 - Page 2 of 4 Transport comgonent (a) Pipelines (b) Pump and Compressor Stations (c.) Tanks and Spheres (d) Truck Loading Facilities Refinery comsonent (a) HDT Unit (b) Hydrogen Generating Unit (c) Sulfur Recovery Unit (d) DEA Unit (a) Offaites Progress of construction should be covered in the text of the report and ahown graphically in charts. Construction Schedule 8. A chart showing planned and actual progress on *a. of the principal events referred to above shall be presented. 9. Simplified CPM or PERT diagrams can be presented with the chatt to give a comprehensive picture of the schedule. Schedule of Orders and Deliveries 10. A schedule of contracts/orders and completionsIdeliveries for maior items of equipment and construction shall be presented in the following form: Description of item Date of bid invitation Date of order/contract Name of supplier/contractor Contract emoun-t Completion/delivery dates Original Revised Actual 11. The schedule shall list major items for which contracts/orders have been placed or bid invitations issued, and those for which bid invitations are scheduled to be issued in the next quarter. The amount in the currency of the contraet shall be shown and its equivalent in U.S. dollars to be rounded to the nearest $1,000 equivalent. - 94 Page 3 of 4 IV. ggarterly Report on Cost Estimate. Expenditure and Comitments Stagtemet 12. The report consists of one table which should be submitted with, and cover the same period as, the techical progress report. The figures of original estimated costs should be those submitted to the Bank. 13. The table should show any substantial changes In the cost estimates that have become necessary since the previous report, alongside the estimate of the previous report and the original estimate. The reasons for such changes ohould be explained in the text of the report. Estimates should be reviewed and revised or confirmed at last every quarter. Such revisions may be necessary after important contracts have been awarded. 14. The table shall include the following: (a) Foreian costs-in US$ - Original estimate (1) - Estimate at last report - Revised estimate (2) - Disbursements Previous (3) - This quarter (4) - Total (3) - (3+4) - Balance of outstanding commitments (6) - Total (7) - (546) - Remaining costs to complete project (8) - (2-7) (b) Local Costs Ssme as In (a) above in US$, clearly indicating conversion date and rates. V. Proiect Completion Re#ort 15. The project completion report Is a comprehensive review of the *xtent to which expectations and objectives at the time the loan was made have been, or show promise of being schieved. For each major project component, the original cost *nd construction time estimto should be compared with tho actual results with comments on the reasons for deviations. Non-physical objectives, such as the installation of new information systems, etc., should also be reviewed and the degree of accomplishment described, with an analysis of the reasons 'or any delays or lack of success. 16. The report should also covert whenever appropriate, the followings (a) The mAjor problems (physical, financial, management, etc.) whiach have arisen, why they arose, and what was done to solve them or minimize their effects; - 95 - a 3.1 Pago 4 oi 4 (b) the performance of consultants *nd contractors; (c) any unusual features of procurement or disbursmeants (d) any unusual procedureq of the Bank which gave rise to problems; (e) staffing and training aspects of the project; (f) aay deviation from the original financing plan and reasons; (g) any problems or changes of an environmental or sociological nature; (h) any actions which need to be taken in order to maximize the benefits from the projects (associated investments, further teecnical training or advisory services, etc.). 17. In brief, the report chould review the appraisal of the project in the light of events to date in order to determine if the original basic assumptions and judgments have turned out to be substantially correct. Source: Bank Mission, March 1990. -96- PVg* 1 of 14 1. The project comrises sVon sts of subprojects only five of which a0 amenable to detailed economic analysis. These comprlse: (a) substitution of thre product pipelLnes for sea and land transport; (b) constructLon of a natural gas pLpeline; and (c) a hydrotreatm t plant i one import refinery. The two element where the analysis ia qualitative rather thn quantitative, comprise optimLxatton automation processes and pollution reduction and account for less thAn 5% of the total project costs. 2. The oconomLc benefits and costs are established on the basis of financaLl beneflts and costs, excluding taxes and subsidies. go signLficant, quantifLable, externalities are present and there soes no more persuasive reason for employLng non-offLaLal than official business exchange rates. Where the benefits result form substitution of plpellnes for land transport, vehicle operating costs derlved from the World Bank Highway Development Nodel (1DM) are employed and where substitution for coastal shLpping i the basis. 8razILan data checked against international shlpping data are employed. Lcnoc AnaILssi 3. The following table summarlsed th results of the economlc analysis: _ _ S3RR - sUMSXTIVZTY ANALYSI8 PQISr la.lot (R (minimum ERRI (Fuel Pr.) 1) mRWAR - FlorLanopolis Pipeline 19 22 15 13 21 2) TMQADRU-Jeqpie-Itabuna 16 18 22 15 18 3) REPLAN - Guararema Pipeline 38 33 28 36 41 4) Santos - Sao Paulo asline 18 27 1S 1S 28 5) RP8C Hydrotreatment Plant a U U 1 Weighted average 21 22 16 18 29 The maln features of the economic analyses of the prLncipal sub-component groups are described belows - 97. Pago 2 of 14 DPrdak - MItMal-PoinnlsPoutiein 4. This sub-project comprises a 10' diameter plpeline from the RIPR refinery to Itajai (189 km) and an 8 diameter pipelLne from ztajai to Florianopolis (64 km). The pipelie would substitute for a (i) me transport of products frm the ports of Santos and Paranagu to Ztajal port; nd (L43 reduce average land transport distances by substituting distribution for Joinville, ItajaL and PlorianopolLe for the preent distribution concentrated on Stajai. Analysis at the pzr-feasibility stage indicated that construction of a systo from the refinery to Plorianopolis yielded higher economic beneflts than construction in two discrete stages. This economic analysis is therefore confined to consideration of the complete pipellne. 5 The base year (1991) traffic, together with projections to 2010 at 3.0% pv.. increase ar shown in Table 6 (the 1989 traffic was about 6% lowvr). The pipeline diameters are basically geared to accommodating the higher traffic level. As the costs of marginal increments ln pipeline capacity are basically the squar root of the capacity increase it is clearly preferable to build in sufficient capacity, rather than risk having to install a second pipeline. 6. A particular feature is that the capacity of the berth at Itajai, presently used for the discharg of petroleum products, is limited in two respectst (i) it is physically impossible to increase the capacity of the berth and associated storage capacity, due cto ncreachbent of surrounding urban developentt and (Ui) the river depth limits the sise of ship which can enter the port and, in practice, means that the tylp'.,al product tanker enters only two- thirds full. to ensure consistency betwen the capacity assumptions with and without the project, an estimate of the capital cost of relocatLag the terminal on the opposite side of the river, whore there is space for expansaon, has been made and its avoidance considered as a benefit. The effect of draught mlitations come out as an abnormal cost of sa transport. 7. The best estimate Iconodic Rate of Return (ERR) is 19% (Table 1). SensitLvity Anlysis (on the base described in para. 29) yields a minimum RRR of 15%. TUI2EaDR-Jeme-Xt& Product Pipeline 8* Presntly, products are partly moved by land from the TUNADRB refinery and partly by coasta1 shipping to the port of Ilbeus, last of the larger city of 1tabuna. The port is a major cocoa export terminal and an a result, interference occurs between petroleum vessels and cocoa ships, which use the sam berths, during the six-months cocoa seaoon. Some plans to expand the port with a dedicated berth exist, but physical work hae not started. As the data on the leel of congestion which occurs during the cocoa season is inconclusive the benefLt, due to eliminating such congestion, is not quantified in this analysis. ther are no draught, nor significant storage limitations on petroleum vessel operstions. Tih proposed project would also reduce land transport costs by estabishing two teralnals, at Jequpl and Stabuna, instead of the present singl1 Zlheu teinal. PDTIOIRAS believes that this corridor has above normal - 98 - Page 3 of 14 potential for consumption of petroleum produets and accordingly r"edict a growth vat. of 5.5 p.a. Table 6 shows the base and final year traffic volumes on this basis. 9. The best estimate tRR is 16% on the abov conservative assumptions (Table 2). Sensitivity analyses described in para. 30 yield a minimum RO of 12%. PWLAM - Guararea P?oduct Pipeline 10. This is a 180 pipeline which would parallel the existing 240 products pipeline between REPLAN and Guararemf terminal (1S3 km) and complement the RUPLAN-sar eri terminal pipeline to tbe West. These, and other terminals, are part of the complex of four interconnected refineries ln Sao Paulo State. 11 SThe aEPLIN refinery primarily serves the mid-West region of Brazil and has a planned capacity increase of about 25% to 60,000 mV/day of products. Because of refinery characteristics, products are transferred between REPLAN and other refwneris, principally REUAP (via the Guararema terminal). Without the propoed pipeline, the system could not accommodate the incremental flows which, in that case, would have to be transported by road. The benefits accordingly reflect the avoidance of this more expensive transportation form. 12, The now pipeline diameter (I8") is designed to accommodate demand growth to about year 2000. This comparatLvely short time horizon was chosen because of uncertainty about speed and cha.acteristics of modifications to the other three refineries in the rgion whLch, as noted, are closely integrated. The benefits are thus held constant for at least 10 years of the project analysis period. 13. The best estimate ORR is 38% (Table 3). senitivity analysis on the basis $escribed in para. 31 yields a minimum MRt of 28%. atural aS Pinelin - 8antos-Sao Paulo 14. PeTRORAS has currently two important obligations concerning natural gas supply. These are a contract with COMGAM to supply 3. 0 m3/day to the Sao Paulo system by 1994 and a "take or pay" contract with Shell/Pecten for supply of non-associated gas from the Nerluza field off Santos, which takes effect at approximately the same timo. 15. The Nerluza gas is from a field with reasonably clearly defined potentalI, and while the contract allows flexibility, in practice PETROBRAS expect to receive a sustained flow averaging 1.5 m m3/day over about 19 years. in the absence of a pipeline connection with Sao Paulo, a substantial part of this production - about 60% - would have to be employed in the RPBD at Santos as a low value input, or flared off, while only about 0.6 a mV/day could be absorbed by industrial in the Santos ara. 16. with the proposed gas pipellne, the flow of gas would depend largely upon the dmwnds of the Sao Paulo market, whLch in turn would depend upon the sped of development of the local distribution system, and the extent to which _ 99 - Page 4 of 14 supply was met by gas from the Campos field, Northeast of Rio. At a minimum, the aforementioned 0.9 m m3/day would probably be passed through. For the purpos of analysis, 1.2 m m3/day ti assumed to be fed to Sao Paulo. This is well wlthin the plpellne capacLty whlch le designed to accept the mamu flow of 2.3 a m3/Gay. 17. The Sao Paulo market has been analyzed in detail by CONMAS during appraisal of SPNGDP. This study postulated an lnterfuel substitution pattern in which the total supply of natural gas by the year 2000 would replace other energy sources as follows: (as percentages of gas supply 72% of fuel oil, 8% naphtha, and 12% of low voltage electrlclty. Because the cost ;.' electrLcLty is very hlgh compared with other fuels, the benefits from natural gas supply are very sensitive to the extent of electrLcity substLtution. Furthermore, more analysis is necessary to establish why users of electriLcity, who presumably could have changed to a comparatLvely close substLtute for natural qas, such as LPC/naphtha, have not already done so. AccordLngly, the conservative approach is taken in this analysis that only fuel oil, LPG and naphtha wlll be replaced, in the *.roportions of 76112112 by year 2000. The economic costs of the replaced energy sources are based upon the analyals carried out for the Sao Paulo Natural Gas Project. 18. The economLc costs include the pipeline investment costs, plus a proportLon of the investment costs not already expanded, on establishment of the distribution system. Again a conservative approach has been adopted: 40% of the non-expended estimated costs, including investments by LndustrLal users, have been attributed to the project (40% is the estimated contribution of the Merlusa gas to the total Sao Paulo supply). 19. The economic cost of the Merluza gas is assumed to be the payment to Shell/Pecten a foreLgn company. The payment formula calls for PETROBRAS to pay Shell/Pecten on a sliding scale with respect to fuel oil prLces the greater the off-take rate, the lower the percentage payment. The proposed 1.5 ml/day is at the boundary of two rates, and the higher rate is employed in this analysisi again, a conservative assumption. The fact that the gas li non-associated would normally suggest that a depletion premium would be applicable on the grounds that it is a non-renewable resource that could be retained ln sLtu for future use. However, this does not seem to be the case under the existing contract. The initiative for the supply of the minimum contractual flow (1.2 m m3/day) rests with Shell/Pecten. The company will supply the gas to shore, and at that point PETR08RAS have, Literally, to use it or lose lt: PETROBRAS can only accelerate deliveries not reduce them. In effect, the depletion premium L subsumed within the payment to Shell/Pecten which s diroectly linked to quantity. 20. On the basis of the above assumption whlch do not include any real priee Lncreases for natural gas or products, the ERR is a fully acceptable 18%. (Table 4) SensitLvity analysis, described Ln para. 31 ylelds a 15% mnimum ERR. 100- AM 3.11 Page 5 of 14 Hvrtretmn_Cm(nntIRT 21. The econceic costs are based on the costs of upgrading the Cubatao refinery by the introduction of HDT. As for the other components, they exclude taxes and subsidies, and aro not shadow priced. 22. The benefits stem primarily from the fact that gas oil fractions whioh are pWt.entially usable for the production of (relatLvely hlgh value) dlesel currently ha'e to be down-graded Lnto fuel oil. Purthermore, this fuel oil La of comparatively hlgh sulphur content and thus lower value--and lees environmentally friendly--than the remainLng product after Litroduction of HDT. 23. The economLc value to be attributed to upgrading the product depends upon baslc border prle a"sumptLons and whether the product li a net import (thus c. l. f ) or export (thus f .o. b. ) The nt directions of flow have been establlshed for Srazll and, so far as thls refinery's products are concerned, are not expected to alter durLng the perLod analysed. The source and destlnatLon assumption are that net imports (LPG, H880, dlesel, naphtha) will originate ln the Mediterranean and net exports (L810 and regular gasolLne) will be destlned for the US Gulf. Varyiag those assumptLons to agree with PUToBURAS assumptLon of imports of LPG from Angola and Caribbean sources/destLnations for other products has little effect on the analysis LLkewlie, to maLataLn consLitency wlth the analyrsi of other sub-projects, and also because of the notorLous dlfflculty ln forecastLng future price change of petroleum, whether crude or products, the basLi scenario assumes constant absolute and relative product border prLces, ln real terms. (The ensitivity analyses vary these assumptLons.) Taking lnto account the above-mentLoned cost and benefLeLal EDT operatLng costs over tho porLod to 2004 with the above-deflned capltal, the SRR is 23%. 24. Associated wlth the HDT are lnvestmeLts ln assessment of and if approprLate, LnstallatLon of advanced control and optimlzatLon systems (ACOs). The estimated cost of these feasibility assesments and lnstallation, ln two separate phases, is estLmated at US$11 mllIlon. Lack of precise knowledge of the level of effLcLency of PUTROBRAS existing control systems makes quantifLcatLon of the beneflts impractLcable at preent. To test the effect of lntroductLon of the system on the EDT economlc vlabillty, two scenarios can be postulateds (i) the feasLbilLty studles are undertaken and show further investments unjustified. The effect is limlted to an addltlonal expenditure of under US$2 mllion wlth an LnsLgnLfLcant effect on the tRR; or (LL) the fasbilIlty studles justLfy Lnstallation of the ACOs system but the beneflts fall to materLalze in a quantlflable form. The total additional cost would be about US$11 million and the basLc ERR would be reduced from 23% to 22%. 25. The best estimate ERR is 23%. (Table 5) Sensitivity analyLsi on the basLi describod ln paras. 33 and 34 yLelds a minimum SRR of 17%. Rpn4t444t, Amlvg"2, 2G. senaLtivlty analyses were carrLed out for all sub-projects to assess whether the investments were tLmely, and (LL) economlcally justified under realistLi alternative assumptions regarding the values attributable to the maln parameters. The rates of return ln the flrst full year of operatlon were in all - 101 - AMZNE 3. 1 Page 6 of 14 cages above the opportunity cost of capital (taken as 12%) and thus the investments are not premature. ,7*;. The variations in parameter values are sub-project specific and are -. :.ibed below together with the results. Two observations are in orders (i) - -n the most conservative assumption all sub-projects achieved satisfactory Zi,s (ii) in ome cases variations ln parameter values which are perfectly reasonable given inherent difficulties in forecasting prices and substitution patterns yielded ERR appreciable higher than in the base cases. gEPAR - F12rianovolis Product Pipeline 28. With cost increased by 10% (and other variables unchanged), the mM is 17%; with demand growth reduced to 2.5% p.a. the ZRR is 18%; with costs increased and demand reduced, the initial year benefit base reduced by 5%, the NRR is still acceptable at 15%. TEMNDRN - Jeau&e Itabuna Product Pioelkie 29. With initial demand reduced 5% and the growth rate reduced to 3.5* (the national average) the ERR is 14%; with costs increased by 10% the ERR Ls 13%; with costs increased by 10% the initial demand reduced by 5%, and the growth rate reduced to 2.5% p.a. the ERR is still acceptable at 11.5%. REPLAN - Cuararema Product Plieline 30. With costs increased by 10%, the ERR is 36%; with benefits reduced by 10% the ERR is 30% and with the combined effects of increased costs and reduced benefit the ERR is still a high 28%. Because the flows represent a balance between different directional movements of products, a sensitivity analysis based upon overall growth is not very meaningful; however, it should be noted that the aggregate increase under the basic scenario is only 1 7% p. a. well below the predicted national product demand growth of 3.5% p.a. Santoo - Sao Paulo Natural Gas Pineline 31. There are several variables the values of which could change and alter the ERR significantly. However, these lead to mainly positive results. if costs increase by 10% the ERR is reduced by two percentage points to 17%; if benefits were reduced on average by 10%, the effect would be similar, and if costs were increased and benefits decreased the ERR would still be a satisfactory 15i%. f, however, PE!ROBRAs was able to move to the next lowest Pecten payment basis, the ERR would increase slgnificantly to 2S%, while if the inter-fuel substitution pattern envisaged by COMAS did indeed materialise, the ERR would increase dramatically to 36%. This latter figure is a reflection of the importance the Merluza/Santos gas supply will assume if the flows from the Campos field to Sao Paulo are restricted for any reason. 32. *The HDT wa subjected to several sensitivity analyses. A reduction in benefits by 10% reduced the ERR to 21%, an increase in costs of the same - 102 - Page 7 of 14 percentage has a similar effect, and a combination of the two offects gsduces the ERR to a still acceptable 18%. Substitution of the Orlgin/destination assumption favored by PETROBRAS has a negligible effect as the freight costs for the main transported product, diesel oil, are virtually identical under the two scenarios. Mdding the costs of the AOOs system, without any attribution of benef its reduces th ERR to 17%. 33. On the other hand, assumption of increase real prices of products increases the ERR. Employing Bank assumptions of a series of price increases based upon the hypothesis that Arab Gulf crude oil prices will increase from $16.2 bbl ln 1989 to $18.2 In 1997 and $20.9 in 2004 increases the ERR to 26%, while adopting of the PETROUMS scenario which envisages an increase to $19.9 in 1997 and $21.9 in 2004 increases the ERR to 33%. Sensitivity to Oil Price Changes 34. Recent events have raised the question of the likely effect of an increase in the price of crude petroleum and petroleum products and substitutes on the project ERRs. This can only be done on a rather imprecise basis, using restricted assumptions. The hypotheses are: i) only operating, not capital, costs will be affected; ii) within these, only fuel and energy costs would increase in the first instance, and the extent and speed of effects on other operating cost components are too imprecise to be included in calculations; Lii) neither the existing nor the proposed energy transport systems would experience efficiency improvements which could be attributed to the above-mentioned price increases, in quantifiable terms; and iv) the relative prices of crude, products and substitutes would not change, in the medium tmes. 35. Under these circumstances, a say 50% price increase would result in a modest increase in the ERR for the three product pipelines (about 1.8%) For the natural gas pipeline and the HDT component, the effects depend upon the assumptions regarding the relative product prices. If, the relative prices are assumed to remain constant then in absolute terms the differences would increase by 50% and the ERRs would increase correspondingly. In what seems the unlikely event of the price of crude petroleum declining below the project benchmark price of US$l5.8/bbl Arabian light in 1993, the adverse effect on the ERR would again be insignificant for the three product pipelines, but greater for the natural gas plpeline and EDT component; with a decline to US$12/bbl the base ERR would decline to 15.1% for the pipeline and to 16.5 for the HDT plant. otal Proiect 36. The ERRs for the sub-projects under the sensitivity analyses described above are summarized in Table 7. Smug:s Dank Mission, August 1990. - 103 - AhIILL U page a of 14 Table Is1: ggtPt&J RBPAR - Flolanolio N A(") 3(W) . AT 01ETR 1 -1.20 .00 18.72 2 10.20 .00 18.72 3 -2.00 .00 18.72 4 10.00 .00 18.72 5 1.40 13.70 18.72 6 1.40 14.18 18.72 7 1.40 14.68 18.72 a 1.40 15.19 18.72 9 1.40 18.72 18.72 10 5.30 16.27 18.72 11 1.60 16.84 18.72 12 1.60 17.43 18.72 13 1.60 18.04 13.72 14 1.60 18.67 18.72 is 1.60 19.33 18.72 16 1.60 20.00 18.72 17 5.80 20.70 18.72 i8 1.80 21.43 18.72 19 1.80 22.18 18.72 20 1.80 22.95 18.72 21 -3.20 23.75 18.72 5 P,TR03MO Bank Mission August 1990 - 104 - Pag* 9 of 14 Table 2t prgduct P&ipLne TWADR-Jegute-Itabuna BssLo Can N A(N) 8(X) RATE OF R8TURN 1 .20 .00 16.26 2 21.60 .00 16.26 3 46.10 .00 16.26 4 10.50 .00 16.26 5 1.60 14.30 16.26 6 1.60 15.09 16.26 7 1.80 15.92 16.26 a 1.80 16.79 16.26 9 1.80 17.72 16.26 10 4.30 18.69 16.26 11 1.80 19.72 16.26 12 2.30 20.80 16.26 13 2.30 21.95 16.26 14 2.30 23.15 16.26 1S 2.30 24.43 16.26 16 2.30 25.77 16.26 17 13.00 27.19 16.26 1a 3.00 28.68 16.26 19 3.00 30.26 16.26 20 3.00 31.92 16.26 21 -6.00 33.68 16.26 5igg= P3TROBRAS, Banki NJsion August 1990 -105- Page 10 of 14 Tabl* 3o Pggfi= *1se ine REPLAB - GUARA N &(N) 3(V) RW? 0o RETUR 1 4.90 .00 37.76 2 9.30 .00 37.76 3 19.00 .00 37.76 4 15.00 .00 37.76 5 .20 16.20 37.76 6 .20 20.10 37.76 7 .30 24.60 37.76 a .40 32.50 37.76 9 50 39.20 37.76 10 .60 44.50 37.76 11 .60 45.80 37.76 12 .60 45.80 37.76 13 .60 45.80 37.76 14 .60 4S.60 37.76 15 .60 45.80 37.76 16 .60 45.80 37.76 17 .60 45.80 37.76 18 .60 4S.80 37.76 19 .60 45.80 37.76 20 .60 45.80 37.76 21 -4.30 45.80 37.76 5~gas 12 38, Bank miesion august 1990 - 106 - Page 1 of 14 Tabl 4s P , PIulIna Snto - Sao Paulo B A"() 3(3) RATS OF RBTURN 1 12.60 .00 18.89 2 18.90 .00 16.89 3 30.70 .00 18.89 4 24.40 16.80 18.89 5 9.90 18.00 18.89 6 9.90 19.70 18.89 7 9.90 20.60 18.89 8 9.90 22.00 18.89 9 .00 23.60 18.89 10 .00 25.20 18.89 11 .00 27.00 18.89 12 .00 29.00 18.89 13 .00 29.00 18.89 14 .00 29.00 18.89 15 .00 29.00 18.89 16 .00 29.00 18.89 17 .00 29.00 18.89 18 .00 29.00 18.89 19 .00 29.00 18.89 20 .00 29.00 18.89 21 .00 29.00 18.89 22 .00 29.00 18.89 asg~ lpzTRAm, Bank ission Augut 1990 - 107 - ANM 3.11 Pago 12 of 14 Table 5t "s ic N A(M) 3(1) RATE OF RSTURN 1 10.88 .00 22.98 2 23.03 .00 22.98 3 79.7$ .00 22.98 4 74.48 .00 22.98 5 .00 36.00 22.98 6 .00 96.20 22.98 7 .00 84.70 22.98 a .00 44.30 22.98 9 .00 45.40 22.98 10 .00 45.40 22.98 11 .00 45.40 22.98 12 .00 45.40 22.98 13 .00 45.40 22.98 14 .00 45.40 22.98 15 .00 45.40 22.98 16 .00 45.40 22.98 gwsa1W fSTROUA, Bank Mission August 1990 - 108 - DNEX 3. 11 Page 13 of 14 Table 6s Product Plueline Plows (000i REPAR TUMADRl- RLAN Florianopolis Jequie-Itabuna Guararema 50kal Incr qntal 1991 1058 78S 10534 1234 2010 1854 2170 14528 5228 2010 1 1509 2010 2 1691 1225 a at 3.58 p.a. 2 at 2.5% V.a. 3 Total flows to/from the refinery and increment to be carried by the nw pipeline. Source: PETROBRAS, Bank Mission August 1990 - 109 - A.NN& 3. 11 Page 14 of 14 Table 7: X8nsitkittv Analyse U& Saj=u biect (BA&JBEU Susitiwity RB min (u" text) Max USPAR - Florianopolis 19 15 17 18 TZMDEE - Jequie - Itabuna 16 12 13 14 RPLAN - Guararema 38 28 30 30 Santos - Sao Paulo 18 15 17 25 36 RDT 23 17 18 26 33 TOTAL 21 16 - -- 5mKaes PETROBA8, Bank Mission August 1990 - 110 AMlL31 Page 1 of 1 WEERGY TRANSPORT AND CONSERVATION PROJECT Documents and Data Available in the Project Files - 'qRD, "Brazil - Energy Strategy and Issues Study: Pricing and Investment Policy" Report No. 8502-BR, May 1990. IBRD S8ugar Subsector Review" Report No. 7589-BR, May 1989. Ministry of Mines & Energy, National Energy Balance 1989 and earlier copies. IBRD World Development Report 1989. IBRD "Brazil - An Asseement of the Current Macroeconomic Situation" Report No. 7540-BR, December 1988. -BRD "Brazil-Public Expenditure, Subsidy Policies and budgetary Reform" Report No. 7738-BR, December 1989. PETROBRAS "Principais Indicadores" Abril de 1989. -CNN Subgrupo de Referencias Basicasw Relatorio Final, March 1989. C. Feu "Investimentos Energeticos" November 1988. EWLTROBRAS "Plano 2010" November 1989. NaEAE "Custos Narginais de fornecimento e precos medios praticados" October 1989. DNAEE "Nova Tarifa de Energia Eletrica: Netodologia e Aplicacao REVISE Relatorio diagnosticos Problemas fundamentais, questoes em rgentes" October 1988. REVISE, "Relatorio final dos subgrupos A, B e F" September 1988. REVISE, "Relatorio final-Kinuta" January 1989. CUP Anuario Estatistico, Ano 1988. P. Notoki "Politica de Precos para Combustiveis Liquidos", 1988. CENAL "The National Alcohol Program" May 1988. I-RD *8razil-Management and Rehabilitation Project, SAR, December 29, 1989. I- RD "Industrial Regulatory Policy and Investment Incentives in Brazil" Report No. 7843-BR, June 1989. A. Rodrigues "A Politica de Precos do Petroleo Q derivados no Brazil". A. Rodrigues "Relatorio Banco Mundial" June 1989. PETROBRAS, "General Characteristics of Oil Products and Alcohol Transportation in Brazil" PETROBRAS "Relatorio Nensal de Acompanhamento das Atividades de PETROBRAS" December 1988, 1989 and 1990. G. Bodeley "Similation of Transp t Costs of Petroleum Products - Brazil" May 1989. CNE "Plangas" 1988. PETROBRAS "Plano de Acao do Setor Petroleo" November 1988. PETROBRAS Annual Financial Reports, 1988, 1989 and 1990. INSET A A CAMPOS N COLOMnJA\J - BASiN / BAHIA BRAZ!L TEMADRE VAS J f.. AjGEMINA ~~~~~~u~~~~~~~~~u~~~~~~~~~y ~~~~~~~~DS ~~ BR~~~ASILIA GOI1AS G E R A I S ESPIRITO SANTO @Belo HGnzonte Vit6ria SAO PAULO REPLAN R- Coc'pcc'c~~~\' ~~.c'c.%cc.c.5~~~ DJ( D~q. d. Cc'cc) -f. CRAM r - A PARANA "/ B R A Z I L .5VU4A TEfRAc-SFS HYDROCARBON TRANSPORT AND PROCESSING PROJECT -1 t,_-sw4 / \ t r15 _s 4 Oil> and Ga.FiId, ITAf A _~4__ ..1" G. Pfp. ("M. in _nll ( ? SANTA _jx- pr.. phi lh.inhj.) AARaN- ' I .) a~fIorianopolis . 0 p-i sluion Ilic 0 Addhcc'to Pc',ctcg Sictaioc @i Nc'tic'oa Cp'jiol A ,c=cc' SIci'c. OncIcc' 0 Sc'Inicd Citi.' a'nd 14-c'c o#>#|lP4l^fft*-°ef~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- f.t-aaalBndn pfffa 7 / 0 ftodc' lIc _. 30. csw=Z.~~~~~~~~~~~~5 40. w_foffff~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ wf _