Appendix 4 Technical Plan to Be Adopted by Each Project Counties Table 4-1 Technology Summary of Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project in Baojing County Name of Name of demonstrati Scale (ha) Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village on area 1. Cd pollution of rice is at middle risk; 1. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 2. Cd pollution of soil is at high risk; 2250kg/ha. 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is pretty Yanjing RⅢ SⅣ O 2. Optimize field moisture management; 24.67 high; exogenous (sedimentation), variety or Village (WⅠDⅢFⅠCⅢ) MⅡ 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 3000kg/ha; management risk may exist in rice risk except 4. Measures of removing straw away from fields; soil. 5. Plant green manure. 4. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. 1. Cd pollution of rice is at middle risk; 1. Optimize field moisture management; 2. Cd pollution of soil is at high risk; 2、Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of RⅢ SⅣ O 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice is pretty high; Ganxi Village 52 3375kg/ha; (WⅠDⅢFⅠCⅢ) MⅡ sedimentation, variety or management risk may 3. Measures of removing straw away from fields; exist in rice risk except soil; Yanjing 3. Plant green manure. 4. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. Demonstrati 1. Cd pollution of rice is at high risk; 1. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of on Area 2. Cd pollution of soil is at low risk; 2250kg/ha. RⅣ SⅡ O 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice is pretty high; 2. Optimize field moisture management; Datuo Village 51.33 (WⅠDⅢFⅠCⅢ) MⅡ sedimentation, variety or management risk may 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 3000kg/ha; exist in rice risk except soil. 4. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 4. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. 4. Plant green manure. 1. Cd pollution of rice is at middle risk; 2. Cd pollution of soil is at middle risk; 1. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is pretty 2250kg/ha. Mawang RⅢ SⅢ O 16 high; exogenous (sedimentation), variety or 2. Optimize field moisture management; Village (WⅠDⅢFⅠCⅡ) MⅡ management risk may exist in rice risk except 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 3000kg/ha; soil. 4. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 4. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. Xiaba 1. Cd pollution of rice is at low risk; 1. Optimize field moisture management; RⅡ SⅣ O Demonstrati Xiaba Village 39.67 2. Cd pollution of soil is at high risk; 2. Soil acidification conditioning; (WⅠDⅢFⅠCⅡ) MⅠ on Area 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice is at low risk; 2. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 3000kg/ha; 1 Name of Name of demonstrati Scale (ha) Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village on area sedimentation, variety or management risk may exist in rice risk except soil; 4. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. 1. Optimize field moisture management; 1. Cd pollution of rice is at middle risk; 2. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of RⅢ SⅣ O Zebi Village 23.67 2. Cd pollution of soil is at high risk; 2250kg/ha; (WⅠDⅢFⅠCⅡ) MⅡ 3. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 1500kg/ha; 4. Plant green manure. 1. Cd pollution of rice is at middle risk; 2. Cd pollution of soil is at extremely high risk; 1. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of Nadong RⅢ SⅤ O 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice is at middle risk; 2250kg/ha; 17 Village (WⅠDⅢFⅠCⅡ)MⅠ sedimentation, variety or management risk may 2. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 4500kg/ha; exist in rice risk except soil; 3. Measures of removing straw away from fields; Nadong 4. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. Demonstrati 1. Cd pollution of rice is at middle risk; 1. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of on Area 2. Cd pollution of soil is at low risk; 1800kg/ha; Heping RⅢ SⅡ O 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice is at middle risk; 2. Plant green manure; 23.67 Village (WⅠDⅢFⅠCⅡ) MⅡ sedimentation, variety or management risk may 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 4500kg/ha; exist in rice risk except soil; 4. Optimize field moisture management; 4. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 1. There is no risk of Cd pollution in rice; 1. Optimize field moisture management; 2. Cd pollution of soil is at extremely high risk; 2. Soil acidification conditioning; Zhongba RⅠSⅤ O 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice is at low risk; 14.33 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 3000kg/ha; Village (WⅠDⅢFⅠCⅠ) MⅠ sedimentation, variety or management risk may Zhongba 4. Optimize field moisture management; exist in rice risk except soil; Demonstrati 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 4. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. on Area 1. Optimize field moisture management; 1. There is no risk of Cd pollution in rice; Shuitian RⅠSⅢO 2. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 34 2. Cd pollution of soil is at middle risk; Village (WⅠDⅢFⅠCⅠ) MⅠ 2250kg/ha; 3. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 1500kg/ha. 1. Cd pollution of rice is at low risk; 1. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of Hangsha Hangsha RⅡSⅠ O 2. There is no risk of Cd pollution in soil; 2250kg/ha; Demonstrati 42 Village (WⅠDⅢFⅠCⅡ)MⅡ 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice is at low risk; 2. Optimize field moisture management; on Area sedimentation, variety or management risk may 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 3000kg/ha; 2 Name of Name of demonstrati Scale (ha) Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village on area exist in rice risk except soil; 4. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 4. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. 1. Cd pollution of rice is at low risk; 1. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 2. Cd pollution of soil is at middle risk; 2250kg/ha; Hangji RⅡSⅢ O 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice is pretty high; 32.33 2. Optimize field moisture management; Village (WⅠDⅢFⅠCⅢ) MⅡ sedimentation, variety or management risk may 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 3000kg/ha; exist in rice risk except soil; 4. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 4. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. 3 Table 4-2 Technology Summary of Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project in Jishou City Name of Name of Scale demonstra Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village (ha.) tion area 1. Cd and As pollution of rice is at low risk; 1. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 1500kg/ha/year; 2. Cd pollution in soil is at low risk, while there is no risk of As in 2. Apply soil passivator for farmland with compound Cd and As RCⅡAⅡ SⅡ O soil; Zhoujiazhai pollution (soil conditioner: 3000kg/ha./season in the first year; 14.2 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCⅠ) 3. There is no risk of enrichment coefficient of rice; exogenous Village 1500kg/ha./season in the second, third, fourth and fifth years). MⅠ (sedimentation), variety or management risk may exist in rice 3. Management and control of contaminated rice; risk. 4. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 4. Cd in rice straw doesn't exceed standard. 1. Cd pollution of rice is at low risk, while there is no risk of As pollution of rice; 1. Optimize field moisture management with waterflooding irrigation; RⅡ SⅠ O 2. Cd pollution in soil is at low risk, while there is no risk of As in 2. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 2250kg/ha; 3. Daba 15.15 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCⅠ) soil; Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 1500kg/ha/year; 4. Management Village MⅡ 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice is at low risk; sedimentation, and control of contaminated rice; 5. Measures of removing straw away Shuangtang variety or management risk may exist in rice risk except soil; from fields; Demonstrat 4. Cd in rice straw doesn't exceed standard. ion Area 1. There is no risk of Cd pollution of rice, while As pollution of 1. Optimize field moisture management and irrigate with appropriate rice is at low risk; amount of water; RCⅠAⅡ SⅠ O 2. Cd pollution in soil is at low risk, while there is no risk of As in 2、Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 3000kg/ha/year; 10.16 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCⅠ) soil; 3. Apply soil passivator for farmland with compound Cd and As MⅡ 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice is at low risk; sedimentation, pollution (soil conditioner: 3000kg/ha./season in the first year; variety or management risk may exist in rice risk except soil; 1500kg/ha./season in the second, third, fourth and fifth years); 5. Shuangtang 4. Cd in rice straw doesn't exceed standard. Measures of removing straw away from fields; Village 1. Cd and As pollution of rice is at low risk; 1. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 1500kg/ha/year; 2. Cd pollution in soil is at low risk, while there is no risk of As in 2. Apply soil passivator for farmland with compound Cd and As RCⅡAⅡ SⅠ O soil; pollution (soil conditioner: 3000kg/ha./season in the first year; 10.15 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCⅠ)M 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice is at low risk; sedimentation, 1500kg/ha./season in the second, third, fourth and fifth years); Ⅱ variety or management risk may exist in rice risk except soil; 3. Management and control of contaminated rice; 4. Cd in rice straw doesn't exceed standard. 4. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 1. Cd and As pollution of rice is at low risk; 1. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 3000kg/ha/year; 2. Apply soil Qianzhou RCⅡAⅡ SⅤ O Guanhou 2. Cd pollution of soil is at extremely high risk, while there is no passivator for farmland with compound Cd and As pollution (soil Demonstrat 87.12 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCⅠ) Village risk of As in soil; conditioner: 3000kg/ha./season in the first year; 1500kg/ha./season in ion Area MⅠ 3. There is no risk of enrichment coefficient of rice; however, the second, third, fourth and fifth years); 3. Management and control of 4 Name of Name of Scale demonstra Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village (ha.) tion area variety, production or management risk may exist in rice risk contaminated rice. 4. Measures of removing straw away from fields; except soil; 4. Cd in rice straw doesn't exceed standard. 1. Cd and As pollution of rice is at low risk; 1. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 1500kg/ha/year; 2. Cd pollution of soil is at high risk, while there is no risk of As 2. Apply soil passivator for farmland with compound Cd and As RcⅡAⅡ SⅣ O pollution of rice; pollution (soil conditioner: 3000kg/ha./season in the first year; 23 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCⅠ) 3. There is no risk of enrichment coefficient of rice; however, 1500kg/ha./season in the second, third, fourth and fifth years); MⅠ variety, production or management risk may exist in rice risk 3. Management and control of contaminated rice; except soil; 4. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 4. Cd in rice straw doesn't exceed standard. Ximenkou Village 1. Cd pollution of rice is at low risk, while there is no risk of As pollution of rice; 1. Optimize field moisture management with waterflooding irrigation; 2. Cd pollution of soil is at middle risk, while there is no risk of RⅡ SⅢ O 2. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 2250kg/ha; As in soil; 22.1 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCⅠ) 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 1500kg/ha/year; 3. There is no risk of enrichment coefficient of rice; however, MⅠ 4. Management and control of contaminated rice; variety, production or management risk may exist in rice risk 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields; except soil; 4. Cd in rice straw doesn't exceed standard. 1. Cd and As pollution of rice is at low risk; 1. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 1500kg/ha/year; RCⅡAⅡ SⅠ O 2. There is no risk of Cd pollution of soil and As in soil; 2. Apply soil passivator for farmland with compound Cd and As Jinye 61.72 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCⅠ) 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice is at low risk; sedimentation, pollution (soil conditioner: 3000kg/ha./season in the first year; Village MⅡ variety or management risk may exist in rice risk except soil; 1500kg/ha./season in the second, third, fourth and fifth years); 4. Cd in rice straw doesn't exceed standard. 3. Management and control of contaminated rice; Aizhai Demonstrat 1. Cd and As pollution of rice is at low risk; ion Area 2. Cd pollution of soil is at extremely high risk, while there is no 1. Apply soil passivator for farmland with compound Cd and As RⅡ SⅤ O risk of As in soil; pollution (soil conditioner: 3000kg/ha./season in the first year; Yangmeng 17.5 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCⅠ) 3. There is no risk of enrichment coefficient of rice; however, 1500kg/ha./season in the following years); Village MⅠ variety, production or management risk may exist in rice risk 2. Management and control of contaminated rice; except soil; 3. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 4. Cd in rice straw doesn't exceed standard. 5 Name of Name of Scale demonstra Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village (ha.) tion area 1. Cd and As pollution of rice is at low risk; 2. Cd pollution in soil is at low risk, while there is no risk of As in 1. Apply soil passivator for farmland with compound Cd and As RCⅡAⅡ SⅡ O soil; pollution (soil conditioner: 3000kg/ha./season in the first year; Paixiong 50.2 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCⅠ) 3. There is no risk of enrichment coefficient of rice; however, 1500kg/ha./season in the following years); Village MⅠ variety, production or management risk may exist in rice risk 2. Management and control of contaminated rice; except soil; 3. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 4. Cd in rice straw doesn't exceed standard. 1. Optimize field moisture management and irrigate with appropriate 1. There is no risk of Cd pollution of rice, while As pollution of amount of water; rice is at low risk; 2. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 1500kg/ha/year; RCⅠAⅡ SⅡ O 2. Cd pollution in soil is at low risk, while there is no risk of As in Xingfu 3. Apply soil passivator for farmland with As pollution (soil 48.5 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCⅠ) soil; Village conditioner: 3000kg/ha./season in the first year; 1500kg/ha./season in MⅠ 3. There is no risk of enrichment coefficient of rice; the second, third, fourth and fifth years); sedimentation, variety or management risk may exist in rice risk; 4. Management and control of contaminated rice; 4. Cd in rice straw doesn't exceed standard. 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 1. Optimize field moisture management and irrigate with appropriate 1. There is no risk of Cd pollution of rice, while As pollution of amount of water; rice is at low risk; 2. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 3000kg/ha/year; RCⅠAⅡ SⅢ O 2. Cd pollution in soil is at middle risk, while there is no risk of 3. Apply soil passivator for farmland with compound Cd and As 14 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCⅠ) As in soil; pollution (soil conditioner: 3000kg/ha./season in the first year; MⅠ 3. There is no risk of enrichment coefficient of rice; 1500kg/ha./season in the second, third, fourth and fifth years); sedimentation, variety or management risk may exist in rice risk; Xiaoxing 4. Management and control of contaminated rice; 4. Cd in rice straw doesn't exceed standard. Village 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 1. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 3000kg/ha/year; 1. Cd and As pollution of rice is at low risk; 2. Apply soil passivator for farmland with compound Cd and As RⅡ SⅡ O 2. Cd pollution of soil is at low risk; pollution (soil conditioner: 3000kg/ha./season in the first year; 18.5 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCⅠ) 3. There is no risk of enrichment coefficient of rice; 1500kg/ha./season in the second, third, fourth and fifth years); MⅠ sedimentation, variety or management risk may exist in rice risk; 3. Management and control of contaminated rice; 4. Cd in rice straw doesn't exceed standard. 4. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 1. There is no risk of Cd pollution of rice, while As pollution of 1. Optimize field moisture management and irrigate with appropriate RCⅠAⅡ SⅣ O Daxing rice is at low risk; amount of water; 28 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCⅠ) Village 2. Cd pollution in soil is at high risk, while there is no risk of As 2. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 1500kg/ha/year; MⅠ in soil; 3. Apply soil passivator for farmland with As pollution (soil 6 Name of Name of Scale demonstra Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village (ha.) tion area 3. There is no risk of enrichment coefficient of rice; conditioner: 3000kg/ha./season in the first year; 1500kg/ha./season in sedimentation, variety or management risk may exist in rice risk; the second, third, fourth and fifth years); 4. Cd in rice straw doesn't exceed standard. 4. Management and control of contaminated rice; 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 1. Optimize field moisture management and irrigate with appropriate 1. There is no risk of Cd pollution of rice, while As pollution of amount of water; rice is at low risk; 2. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 1500kg/ha/year; RCⅠAⅡ SⅤ O 2. Cd pollution of soil is at extremely high risk, while there is no 3. Apply soil passivator for farmland with As pollution (soil 27.2 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCⅠ) risk of As in soil; conditioner: 3000kg/ha./season in the first year; 1500kg/ha./season in MⅠ 3. There is no risk of enrichment coefficient of rice; the second, third, fourth and fifth years); sedimentation, variety or management risk may exist in rice risk; 4. Management and control of contaminated rice; 4. Cd in rice straw doesn't exceed standard. 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 7 Table 4-3 Technology Summary of Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project in Yongshun County Name of Scale Name of village Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures demonstration area (ha.) 1. There is no risk of Cd pollution in rice and As pollution is at low risk; 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at high risk, while there is no risk of As; RCⅠAⅡ SCⅣ AⅠO (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅠ) 17.12 3. There is no risk of enrichment 1. Apply Cd and As synchronous passivator of 4500kg/ha. MⅠ coefficient of rice variety; 4. Rice risk exists in soil risk; 4. Cd and As in rice straw do not exceed the standard. 1. Popularize low accumulated rice variety; 2. Optimize field moisture management with waterflooding irrigation; 3. Soil acidification conditioning. According to Hunan Wanping 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at middle Beiliping Village Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Demonstration Area risk, while there is no risk of As; Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at low Adjusting Acid and Reducing Cadmium in Lime Composite: risk, while there is no risk of As; apply lime of 3t/ha./season in the first and second year; the 3. The enrichment coefficient of rice RCⅢAⅠ SCⅡAⅠO (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅢAⅠ) application amount shall be reduced half in the third and 20.54 variety is at middle risk; MⅢ fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth year. 4. The Cd in rice straw is at middle 4. Apply soil passivator. According to Hunan Integrated risk, while there is no risk of As Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project with 5. Other input products or varieties and World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Reducing management risks may exist in rice risk Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply lime of except soil. 3375t/ha·season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be reduced half in the third and fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth year). 5. Straw removal 8 Name of Scale Name of village Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures demonstration area (ha.) 1. Popularize low accumulated rice variety; 2. Optimize field moisture management with waterflooding irrigation; 3. Soil acidification conditioning. According to Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for extremely high risk, while there is no Adjusting Acid and Reducing Cadmium in Lime risk of As; Composite: apply lime of 3t/ha./season in the first and 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at low second year; the application amount shall be reduced half in risk, while there is no risk of As; the third and fourth year; the application shall be stopped in RCV AⅠ SCⅡAⅠO (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCVAⅠ) 3. The enrichment coefficient of rice 10.27 the fifth year. MV variety is at extremely high risk; 4. Apply organic fertilizer with the amount of 0.9t/ha per 4. The Cd in rice straw is at extremely season; high risk, while there is no risk of As; 5. Apply soil passivator. According to Hunan Integrated 5. Other input products or varieties and Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project with management risks may exist in rice risk World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Reducing except soil. Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply lime of 3375t/ha·season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be reduced half in the third and fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth year). 6. Straw removal. 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at extremely high risk, while there is no risk of As; 1. Plant rape and gradually renovate agricultural land 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at middle pollution; risk, while there is no risk of As; 2. Strengthen monitoring, management and control on RCV AⅠ SCⅢAⅠO (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCVAⅠ) 3. The enrichment coefficient of rice 23.96 heavy metal pollution in agricultural land; control high-risk MV variety is at extremely high risk; agricultural inputs from accessing into agricultural land; 4. The Cd in rice straw is at extremely 3. Strengthen management and control on pollution sources; high risk, while there is no risk of As; 4. Prevent spread of agricultural land pollutants. 5. Other input products or varieties and management risks may exist in rice risk except soil. 9 Name of Scale Name of village Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures demonstration area (ha.) 1. There is no risk of the Cd and As pollution in rice; 1. Soil acidification conditioning. According to Hunan 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at low Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution risk, while there is no risk of As; Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for RCⅠAⅠ 3. There is no risk of enrichment Adjusting Acid and Reducing Cadmium in Lime 13.35 SCⅡAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅠ)MⅠ coefficient of rice variety; Composite: apply lime of 3t/ha./season in the first and 4. Cd and As in rice straw do not second year; the application amount shall be reduced half in exceed the standard; the third and fourth year; the application shall be stopped in 5. Although there is no risk of rice, the the fifth year. soil risk exists. 1. Optimize field moisture management with waterflooding irrigation; 2. Soil acidification conditioning. According to Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Shangping Village 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at middle Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for risk, while there is no risk of As; Adjusting Acid and Reducing Cadmium in Lime 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at low Composite: apply lime of 3t/ha./season in the first and risk, while there is no risk of As; second year; the application amount shall be reduced half in 3. The enrichment coefficient of rice RCⅢAⅠ the third and fourth year; the application shall be stopped in 23.36 variety is at low risk; SCⅡAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅢAⅠ)MⅡ the fifth year. 4. The Cd in rice straw is at middle 3. Apply soil passivator. According to Hunan Integrated risk, while there is no risk of As Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project with 5. Other input products or varieties and World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Reducing management risks may exist in rice risk Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply lime of except soil. 3375t/ha·season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be reduced half in the third and fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth year). 4. Straw removal. 10 Name of Scale Name of village Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures demonstration area (ha.) 1. Popularize low accumulated rice variety; 2. Optimize field moisture management with waterflooding irrigation; 3. Soil acidification conditioning. According to Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution 1The Cd pollution in rice is at Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for extremely high risk, while there is no Adjusting Acid and Reducing Cadmium in Lime risk of As; Composite: apply lime of 3t/ha./season in the first and 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at middle second year; the application amount shall be reduced half in risk, while there is no risk of As; the third and fourth year; the application shall be stopped in RCV AⅠ 3. The enrichment coefficient of rice 10.01 the fifth year. SCⅢAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCVAⅠ)MⅢ variety is at middle risk; 4. Apply organic fertilizer with the amount of 0.9t/ha per 4. The Cd in rice straw is at extremely season; high risk, while there is no risk of As; 5. Apply soil passivator. According to Hunan Integrated 5. Other input products or varieties and Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project with management risks may exist in rice risk World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Reducing except soil. Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply lime of 4000t/ha per season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be reduced half in the third and fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth year). 6. Straw removal. 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at extremely high risk, while there is no risk of As; 1. Plant rape and gradually renovate agricultural land 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at low pollution; risk, while there is no risk of As; 2. Strengthen monitoring, management and control on RCV AⅠ SCⅡAⅠO (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCVAⅠ) 3. The enrichment coefficient of rice 10.01 heavy metal pollution in agricultural land; control high-risk MV variety is at extremely high risk; agricultural inputs from accessing into agricultural land; 4. The Cd in rice straw is at extremely 3. Strengthen management and control on pollution sources; high risk, while there is no risk of As; 4. Prevent spread of agricultural land pollutants. 5. Other input products or varieties and management risks may exist in rice risk except soil. 11 Name of Scale Name of village Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures demonstration area (ha.) 1. There is no risk of the Cd and As pollution in rice; 1. Soil acidification conditioning. According to Hunan 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at low Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution risk, while there is no risk of As; Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for RCⅠAⅠ SCⅡAⅠO (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅠ) 3. There is no risk of enrichment Adjusting Acid and Reducing Cadmium in Lime 15.94 MⅠ coefficient of rice variety; Composite: apply lime of 3t/ha./season in the first and 4. Cd and As in rice straw do not second year; the application amount shall be reduced half in exceed the standard; the third and fourth year; the application shall be stopped in 5. Although there is no risk of rice, the the fifth year. soil risk exists. 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at middle risk, the As pollution is at low risk; 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at middle risk, while there is no risk of As; 1. Apply organic fertilizer with the amount of 0.9t/ha per 3. The enrichment coefficient of rice RCⅢAⅡ SCⅢAⅠO (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅢAⅠ) season; 23.91 variety is at low risk; Xinglong MⅡ 2. Apply Cd and As synchronous passivator of 4500kg/ha.; 4. The Cd in rice straw is at middle Neighborhood 3. Straw removal. risk, while there is no risk of As Committee 5. Other input products or varieties and management risks may exist in rice risk except soil. 1. Popularize low accumulated rice variety; 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at 2. Soil acidification conditioning. According to Hunan extremely high risk, the As pollution is Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution at low risk; Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at low Adjusting Acid and Reducing Cadmium in Lime risk, while there is no risk of As; Composite: apply lime of 3t/ha./season in the first and RCV AⅡ 3. The enrichment coefficient of rice 23.91 second year; the application amount shall be reduced half in SCⅡAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCVAⅠ)MⅢ variety is at middle risk; the third and fourth year; the application shall be stopped in 4. The Cd in rice straw is at extremely the fifth year. high risk, while there is no risk of As; 3. Apply organic fertilizer with the amount of 0.72t/ha. per 5. Other input products or varieties and season; management risks may exist in rice risk 4. Apply Cd and As synchronous passivator of 4500kg/ha.; except soil. 5. Straw removal. 12 Name of Scale Name of village Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures demonstration area (ha.) 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at extremely high risk, while there is no risk of As; 1. Plant rape and gradually renovate agricultural land 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at middle pollution; risk, while there is no risk of As; 2. Strengthen monitoring, management and control on RCVAⅠSCⅢAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCVAⅠ) 3. The enrichment coefficient of rice 23.91 heavy metal pollution in agricultural land; control high-risk MV variety is at extremely high risk; agricultural inputs from accessing into agricultural land; 4. The Cd in rice straw is at extremely 3. Strengthen management and control on pollution sources; high risk, while there is no risk of As; 4. Prevent spread of agricultural land pollutants. 5. Other input products or varieties and management risks may exist in rice risk except soil. 1. There is no risk of Cd pollution in rice and As pollution is at low risk; 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at middle risk, while there is no risk of As; 3. There is no risk of enrichment coefficient of rice variety; RCⅠAⅡSCⅢAⅠO (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅡ) 1. Apply Cd and As synchronous passivator of 4500kg/ha.; 14.55 4. There is no risk of the Cd pollution MⅠ 2. Straw removal. in rice, while the As pollution is at low risk; 5. Although there is no risk of Cd in rice, Cd risk exists in soil; As risk of Longzhai Village rice may be brought by risk of other inputs. 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at low 1. Popularize low accumulated rice variety; risk, while there is no risk of As; 2. Optimize field moisture management with waterflooding 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at low irrigation; risk, while there is no risk of As; 3. Soil acidification conditioning. According to Hunan RCⅡAⅠSCⅡAⅠO (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅡAⅠ) 3. The enrichment coefficient of rice Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution 17.46 MⅢ variety is at middle risk; Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for 4. The Cd in rice straw is at low risk, Adjusting Acid and Reducing Cadmium in Lime while there is no risk of As; Composite: apply lime of 3t/ha./season in the first and 5. Other input products or varieties and second year; the application amount shall be reduced half in management risks may exist in rice risk the third and fourth year; the application shall be stopped in 13 Name of Scale Name of village Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures demonstration area (ha.) except soil. the fifth year. 4. Straw removal. 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at 1. Popularize low accumulated rice variety; extremely high risk, the As pollution is 2. Soil acidification conditioning. According to Hunan at low risk; Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for extremely high risk, while there is no Adjusting Acid and Reducing Cadmium in Lime risk of As; Composite: apply lime of 3t/ha./season in the first and RCVAⅡSCVAⅠO (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCVAⅠ) 8.73 3. The enrichment coefficient of rice second year; the application amount shall be reduced half in MⅢ variety is at middle risk; the third and fourth year; the application shall be stopped in 4. The Cd in rice straw is at extremely the fifth year. high risk, while there is no risk of As 3. Apply organic fertilizer with the amount of 0.72t/ha. per 5. Other input products or varieties and season; management risks may exist in rice risk 4. Apply Cd and As synchronous passivator of 4500kg/ha.; except soil. 5. Straw removal. 14 Table 4-4 Technology Summary of Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project in Huayuan County Name of Name of Scale demonstra Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village (ha.) tion area 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and cultivation management; 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at high 2. Optimize field moisture management (waterflooding irrigation); risk, while there is no risk of As; 3. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan Integrated Management of 2. The Cd in soil is at low risk, while Agricultural Land Pollution Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for RCⅣAⅠ SCⅡAⅠO there is no risk of As; Laotianping Adjusting Acid and Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 3.75ton/ha per 72 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCCⅡAⅠ) 3. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard; Village season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third MⅡ 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice and the fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth year). variety is at low risk; exogenous 4. Apply soil passivator; (sedimentation), variety or management 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields; Huayuan risk may exist in rice risk except soil. 6. Control of rice variety with high accumulation of pollutants; Town 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. Demonstr 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, ation Area variety of crops and cultivation management; 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at high 2. Control of rice variety with high accumulation of pollutants; risk, while there is no risk of As; 3. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan Integrated Management of 2. The Cd and As in soil are at low risk; RCⅢAⅠ SCⅢAⅡO Agricultural Land Pollution Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Zhuchao 3. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard; 26 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCCⅡAⅠ) Adjusting Acid and Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 3.75ton/ha per Village 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice MⅡ season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third variety is at low risk; exogenous and the fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth year). (sedimentation), variety or management 4. Apply commercial organic fertilizer; risk may exist in rice risk except soil. 5. Apply soil passivator; 6. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated 15 rice. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land and management and control of Cd and As balance; RCⅠAⅠ SCⅤAⅠO 1. There is no risk of Cd and As in rice; 2. Optimize field moisture management (waterflooding irrigation); 6.26 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCCⅠAⅠ) 2. The Cd in soil is at extremely high 3. Alternative fertilization measure for soil acidification conditioning and control of potential risk MⅠ risk, while there is no risk of As; in rice and soil; 4. Apply commercial organic fertilizer; 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at middle Ganggang risk, while there is no risk of As; Village 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at variety of crops and cultivation management; RCⅢAⅠ SCⅤAⅡO extremely high risk, while the As 2. Apply commercial organic fertilizer; 16.74 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCCⅠAⅠ) pollution is at middle risk; 3. Apply Cd and As synchronous passivator; MⅡ 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice 4. Control of rice variety with high accumulation of pollutants; variety is at low risk; exogenous 5. Management and control of contaminated rice. (sedimentation), variety or management risk may exist in rice risk except soil. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land and management and control of Cd and As balance; 2. Optimize field moisture management (waterflooding irrigation); RCⅠAⅠ SCⅤAⅠO 1. There is no risk of Cd and As in rice; 3. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan Integrated Management of 29.92 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCCⅠAⅠ) 2. The Cd in soil is at extremely high Longtan Agricultural Land Pollution Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for MⅠ risk, while there is no risk of As. Town Longmen Adjusting Acid and Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 3.75ton/ha per Demonstr Village season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third ation Area and the fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth year). 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at 1. Plant flower, nursery stock and mulberry and gradually renovate agricultural land pollution; RCⅤAⅠ SCⅤAⅠO extremely high risk, while there is no 2. Strengthen monitoring, management and control on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land; 25.08 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCCⅣAⅠ) risk of As; control high-risk agricultural inputs from accessing into agricultural land; 3. Strengthen MⅠ 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at management and control on pollution sources; 4. Prevent spread of agricultural land pollutants. 16 extremely high risk, while there is no risk of As; 3. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at high variety of crops and cultivation management; risk, while there is no risk of As; 2. Control of rice variety with high accumulation of pollutants; 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at 3. Optimize field moisture management (waterflooding irrigation); extremely high risk, while there is no 4. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan Integrated Management of RCⅣAⅠ SCⅤAⅠO risk of As; Agricultural Land Pollution Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for 7.69 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCCⅢAⅠ) 3. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. 4. Adjusting Acid and Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 3.75ton/ha per MⅡ Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third at low risk; exogenous (sedimentation), and the fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth year); variety or management risk may exist 5. Apply soil passivator; Jinrong in rice risk except soil. 6. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated Village rice. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land and management and control of Cd and As balance; 2. Optimize field moisture management (waterflooding irrigation); RCⅠAⅠ SCⅤAⅠO 1. There is no risk of Cd and As in rice; 3. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan Integrated Management of 16.31 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCCⅠAⅠ) 2. The Cd in soil is at extremely high Agricultural Land Pollution Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for MⅠ risk, while there is no risk of As; Adjusting Acid and Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 3.75ton/ha per season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third and the fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth year); 4. Apply commercial organic fertilizer. Malichang 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land; RCⅠAⅠ SCⅠAⅠO Town Geyu 1. There is no risk of Cd and As in rice; 2. Optimize field moisture management (waterflooding irrigation); 7.38 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCCⅠAⅠ) Demonstr Village 2. There is no risk of Cd and As in soil. 3. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan Integrated Management of MⅠ ation Area Agricultural Land Pollution Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for 17 Adjusting Acid and Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 3.75ton/ha per season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third and the fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth year); 4 Apply commercial organic fertilizer. 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at extremely high risk, while the As 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, pollution is at low risk; variety of crops and cultivation management; RCⅣAⅡ SCⅠAⅠO 2. There is no risk of Cd and As in soil; 2. Control of rice variety with high accumulation of pollutants; 15.6 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCCⅢAⅠ) 3. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. 3. Apply Cd and As synchronous passivator; MⅢ 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice 4. Measures of removing straw away from fields; variety is at middle risk; exogenous 5. Management and control of contaminated rice. (sedimentation), variety or management risk may exist in rice risk except soil. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at variety of crops and cultivation management; extremely high risk, while there is no 2. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan Integrated Management of risk of As; Agricultural Land Pollution Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for 2. There is no risk of Cd and As in rice; RCⅤAⅠ SCⅠAⅠO Adjusting Acid and Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 3.75ton/ha per 3. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. 10.02 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCCⅤAⅠ) season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice MⅤ and the fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth year); variety is at extremely high risk; 5. Apply commercial organic fertilizer; exogenous (sedimentation), variety or 6. Apply soil passivator; management risk may exist in rice risk 7. Measures of removing straw away from fields; except soil. 8. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land and management and RCⅠAⅠ SCⅠAⅡO 1. There is no risk of Cd and As in rice; Wanggao control of Cd and As balance; 6.42 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCCⅠAⅠ) 2. There is no risk of the Cd in soil, Village 2. Irrigate with little water; MⅠ while As in soil is at low risk; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer. 18 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and cultivation management; 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at high 2. Control of rice variety with high accumulation of pollutants; risk, while there is no risk of As; 3. Optimize field moisture management (waterflooding irrigation); 2. There is no risk of Cd and As in soil; 4. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan Integrated Management of RCⅣAⅠ SCⅠAⅠO 3. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. Agricultural Land Pollution Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for 9.22 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCCⅢAⅠ) 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice Adjusting Acid and Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 3.75ton/ha per MⅢ variety is at middle risk; exogenous season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third (sedimentation), variety or management and the fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth year); risk may exist in rice risk except soil. 5. Apply soil passivator; 6. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and cultivation management; 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at 2. Optimize field moisture management (waterflooding irrigation); extremely high risk, while there is no 3. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan Integrated Management of risk of As; Agricultural Land Pollution Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for 2. There is no risk of Cd and As in soil; RCⅤAⅠ SCⅠAⅠO Adjusting Acid and Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 3.75ton/ha per 3. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. 12.36 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCCⅤAⅠ) season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice MⅤ and the fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth year); variety is at extremely high risk; 4. Apply commercial organic fertilizer; exogenous (sedimentation), variety or 5. Control of rice variety with high accumulation of pollutants; management risk may exist in rice risk 6. Apply Cd and As synchronous passivator; except soil. 7. Management and control of contaminated rice; 8. Measures of removing straw away from fields; Mao’er RCⅠAⅡ SCⅤAⅢO 1. There is no risk of Cd pollution in 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land and management and Mao’er Township 10.33 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCCⅠAⅠ) rice, while the As pollution is at low control of Cd and As balance; Village Demonstr MⅠ risk; 2. Irrigate with little water; 19 ation Area 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer; extremely high risk, and the As 4. Apply soil passivator; pollution is at middle risk. 5. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at high 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, risk, while there is no risk of As; RCⅣAⅠ SCⅠAⅢO variety of crops and cultivation management; 2. There is no risk of the Cd pollution 45.67 (WⅠDⅡFⅠCCⅢAⅠ) 2. Apply soil passivator; in soil, while the As pollution is at MⅠ 3. Management and control of contaminated rice; middle risk; 4. Measures of removing straw away from fields. 3. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. 20 Table 4-5 Technology Summary of Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project in Cili County Name of Name of village Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures demonstration area 1. There is no risk of Cd pollution in 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land rice; RⅠSⅠO (WⅠD1F1C1) M1 with the focus on rice and soil; 2. There is no risk of Cd pollution in 2. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha. soil; 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land with the focus on rice and soil; 2. Irrigate with little water and guarantee clean water source; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha. 1. Cd pollution of rice is at middle 4. Apply cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator according to risk; Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project 2. The As pollution in rice is at low with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Reducing RCⅢ AⅡSⅤ O (WⅠD1F1CⅡ) M1 risk; Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply cadmium and arsenic 3. Cd pollution in soil is at synchronous passivator of 3 ton/ha. per season in the first and second extremely high risk; year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third and 4. Rice straw exceeds standard. fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth and sixth year); Yangliupu Township Siqiao Village 5. Strengthen management and control of the rice variety with high accumulation of pollutants; 6. Remove straw from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at with the focus on rice and soil; middle risk; 2. Irrigate with little water and guarantee clean water source; 2. The As pollution in rice is at low 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha. risk; 4. Apply cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator according to 3. The Cd pollution in soil is at Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project RCⅢ AⅡSⅤ O (WⅠD1F1CⅣ) MⅡ extremely high risk; with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Reducing 4. Rice straw exceeds standard; Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply cadmium and arsenic 5. Enrichment coefficient of rice synchronous passivator of 3 ton/ha. per season in the first and second variety is at low risk; sedimentation, year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third and variety or management risk may fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth and sixth year); exist in rice risk except soil; 5. Strengthen popularization of rice variety with low accumulation of 21 Name of Name of village Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures demonstration area pollutants; 6. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land with the focus on rice and soil; 2. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project with 1. There is no risk of Cd pollution in World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Adjusting Acid and rice; RⅠSⅣ O (WⅠD1F1CⅠ) MⅠ Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 2.25ton/ha per 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at high season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be risk. reduced by half in the third year; the application shall be stopped in the fourth, fifth sixth year); 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha. 4. waterflooding irrigation, guarantee clean water source. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land with the focus on rice and soil; Huayue Village 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at high 2. Irrigate with little water and guarantee clean water source; risk; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha. 2. The As pollution in rice is at low 4. Apply cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator according to risk; Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project 3. Cd pollution of soil is at high with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Reducing RCⅣ AⅡSⅢO (WⅠD1F1CⅢ) MⅡ risk; Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply cadmium and arsenic 4. Rice straw exceeds standard; synchronous passivator of 3 ton/ha. per season in the first and second 5. Enrichment coefficient of rice year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third and variety is at low risk; sedimentation, fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth and sixth year); variety or management risk may 5. Strengthen management and control of the rice variety with high exist in rice risk except soil; accumulation of pollutants; 6. Remove straw from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land with the focus on rice and soil; 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at low Tongjinpu Town Pingshan Village RⅡSⅠO (WⅠD1F1CⅠ) MⅠ 2. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan risk. Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Adjusting Acid and 22 Name of Name of village Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures demonstration area Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 2.25ton/ha. per season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third year; the application shall be stopped in the fourth, fifth sixth year); 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 750 kg/ha; 4. waterflooding irrigation, guarantee clean water source; 5. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land with the focus on rice and soil; 2. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Adjusting Acid and Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 2.25ton/ha. 1. The As pollution in rice is at low per season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be RⅡSⅠO (WⅠD1F1CⅡ) MⅢ risk. reduced by half in the third year; the application shall be stopped in the fourth, fifth sixth year); 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 750kg/ha; 4. waterflooding irrigation, guarantee clean water source; 5. Strengthen popularization of rice variety with low accumulation of pollutants; 6. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land with the focus on rice and soil; 2. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan 1. Cd pollution in rice is at low risk; Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project with 2. Cd pollution in soil is at low risk; World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Adjusting Acid and 3. Rice straw exceeds standard; Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 2.25ton/ha per Tunhu Village RⅡSⅡO (WⅠD1F1CⅡ) MⅡ 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be variety is at low risk; sedimentation, reduced by half in the third year; the application shall be stopped in the variety or management risk may fourth, fifth sixth year); exist in rice risk except soil; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 750kg/ha; 4. waterflooding irrigation, guarantee clean water source; 5. Strengthen popularization of rice variety with low accumulation of 23 Name of Name of village Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures demonstration area pollutants; 6. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land with the focus on rice and soil; 2. Irrigate with little water and guarantee clean water source; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 750kg/ha.; 4. Apply cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator according to 1. The As pollution in rice is at high Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project risk; RCⅠAⅢ SⅣO (WⅠD1F1CⅠ) MⅠ with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Reducing 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at high Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply cadmium and arsenic risk. synchronous passivator of 3 ton/ha. per season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third and fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth and sixth year); 5. Remove straw from fields; 6. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land with the focus on rice and soil; 2. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Adjusting Acid and 1. There is no risk of Cd pollution in Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 2.25ton/ha per RⅠ SⅡ O (WⅠD1F1CⅠ) MⅠ rice; season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be 2. Cd pollution of soil is at low risk; reduced by half in the third year; the application shall be stopped in the fourth, fifth sixth year); Chenping Village 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 750kg/ha.; 4. waterflooding irrigation, guarantee clean water source; 5. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Cd pollution of rice is at low risk; 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land 3. Cd pollution of soil is at high with the focus on rice and soil; risk; 2. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan RⅡ SⅣ O (WⅠD1F1CⅡ) MⅡ 3. Rice straw exceeds standard; Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project with 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Adjusting Acid and variety is at low risk; sedimentation, Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 2.25ton/ha per 24 Name of Name of village Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures demonstration area variety or management risk may season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be exist in rice risk except soil; reduced by half in the third year; the application shall be stopped in the fourth, fifth sixth year); 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 750kg/ha; 4. waterflooding irrigation, guarantee clean water source; 5. Strengthen popularization of rice variety with low accumulation of pollutants; 6. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land with the focus on rice and soil; 2 Irrigate with little water and guarantee clean water source; 1. Cd pollution of rice is at low risk; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha; 2. The As pollution in rice is at low 4. Apply cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator according to risk; Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project 4. Cd pollution of soil is at high with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Reducing RCⅡ AⅡ SⅢ O (WⅠD1F1CⅡ) risk; Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply cadmium and arsenic MⅡ 4. Rice straw exceeds standard; synchronous passivator of 3 ton/ha. per season in the first and second 5. Enrichment coefficient of rice year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third and variety is at low risk; sedimentation, fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth and sixth year); variety or management risk may 5. Strengthen popularization of rice variety with low accumulation of exist in rice risk except soil; pollutants; 6. Remove straw from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land with the focus on rice and soil; 2. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project with 1. There is no risk of Cd pollution in World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Adjusting Acid and Xingyue Village RⅠ SⅡ O (WⅠD1F1CⅠ) MⅠ rice; Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 2.25ton/ha per 2. Cd pollution of soil is at low risk; season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third year; the application shall be stopped in the fourth, fifth sixth year); 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 750kg/ha; 25 Name of Name of village Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures demonstration area 4. waterflooding irrigation, guarantee clean water source; 5. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land with the focus on rice and soil; 2. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan 1.Cd pollution of rice is at middle Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project with risk; World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Adjusting Acid and 2. Cd pollution of soil is at middle Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 3 ton/ha per risk; season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be RⅢ SⅢ O (WⅠD1F1CⅢ) MⅡ 3. Rice straw exceeds standard; reduced by half in the third year; the application shall be stopped in the 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice fourth, fifth sixth year); variety is at low risk; sedimentation, 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 750kg/ha.; variety or management risk may 4. waterflooding irrigation, guarantee clean water source; exist in rice risk except soil; 5. Strengthen popularization of rice variety with low accumulation of pollutants; 6. Remove straw from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land with the focus on rice and soil; 2. Irrigate with little water and guarantee clean water source; 1. Cd pollution of rice is at middle 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 750kg/ha; risk; 4. Apply cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator according to 2. The As pollution in rice is at low Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project risk; with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Reducing RCⅢ AⅡ SⅠ O (WⅠD1F1CⅢ) 3. There is no risk of Cd in soil; Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply cadmium and arsenic MⅢ 4. Rice straw exceeds standard; synchronous passivator of 3 ton/ha. per season in the first and second 5. Enrichment coefficient of rice year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third and variety is at middle risk; variety, fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth and sixth year); production or management risk may 5. Strengthen popularization of rice variety with low accumulation of exist. pollutants; 6. Remove straw from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 26 Name of Name of village Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures demonstration area 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land with the focus on rice and soil; 2. Irrigate with little water and guarantee clean water source; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 750kg/ha.; 4. Apply cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator according to Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project 1. The As pollution in rice is at with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Reducing RCⅠ AⅢ SⅡ O (WⅠD1F1CⅠ) middle risk; Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply cadmium and arsenic MⅠ 2. Cd pollution of soil is at low risk; synchronous passivator of 3 ton/ha. per season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third and fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth and sixth year); 5. Strengthen popularization of rice variety with low accumulation of pollutants; 6. Remove straw from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land with the focus on rice and soil; 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at high 2. Irrigate with little water and guarantee clean water source; risk; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 750kg/ha; 2. The As pollution in rice is at low 4. Apply cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator according to risk; Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project 3. The Cd pollution in soil is at with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Reducing RCⅤ AⅡ SⅢ O (WⅠD1F1CⅤ) middle risk; Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply cadmium and arsenic MⅢ 4. Rice straw exceeds standard; synchronous passivator of 3 ton/ha. per season in the first and second 5. Enrichment coefficient of rice year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third and variety is at middle risk; variety, fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth and sixth year); production or management risk may 5. Strengthen popularization of rice variety with low accumulation of exist. pollutants; 6. Remove straw from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. There is no risk of Cd pollution in 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land Gaoqiao Town Xianfeng Village RⅠ SⅠ O (WⅠD1F1CⅠ) MⅠ rice; with the focus on rice and soil; 2. There is no risk of Cd pollution in 2. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha. 27 Name of Name of village Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures demonstration area soil; 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land with the focus on rice and soil; 2. Irrigate with little water and guarantee clean water source; 1. Cd pollution of rice is at middle 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha.; risk; 4. Apply cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator according to 2. The As pollution in rice is at low Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project risk; with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Reducing RCⅢ AⅡ SⅠ O(WⅠD1F1CⅢ ) 3. There is no risk of Cd in soil; Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply cadmium and arsenic MⅢ 4. Rice straw exceeds standard; synchronous passivator of 3 ton/ha. per season in the first and second 5. Enrichment coefficient of rice year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third and variety is at middle risk; variety, fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth and sixth year); production or management risk may 5. Strengthen popularization of rice variety with low accumulation of exist. pollutants; 6. Remove straw from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land 1. There is no risk of Cd pollution in with the focus on rice and soil; RⅠ SⅡ O(WⅠD1F1CⅠ ) MⅠ rice; 2. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 3000kg/ha.; 2. Cd pollution of soil is at low risk; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 750kg/ha; 4. waterflooding irrigation, guarantee clean water source. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land with the focus on rice and soil; 1. Cd pollution of rice is at low risk; Yangfengping 2. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan Dongyueguan Town 2. There is no risk of Cd pollution in Village Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project with soil; World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Adjusting Acid and 3. Rice straw exceeds standard; RⅡ SⅠ O(WⅠD1F1CⅡ ) MⅢ Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 3 ton/ha per 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be variety is at low risk; sedimentation, reduced by half in the third year; the application shall be stopped in the variety or management risk may fourth, fifth sixth year); exist in rice risk except soil. 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 750kg/ha; 4. waterflooding irrigation, guarantee clean water source; 28 Name of Name of village Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures demonstration area 5. Strengthen popularization of varieties with low accumulation of pollutants. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land with the focus on rice and soil; 2. Irrigate with little water and guarantee clean water source; 1. Cd pollution of rice is at middle 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 750kg/ha.; risk; 4. Apply cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator according to 2. The As pollution in rice is at low Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project risk; with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Reducing 3. There is no risk of Cd in soil; RCⅢ AⅡ SⅠ O(WⅠD1F1CⅢ) MⅣ Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply cadmium and arsenic 4. Rice straw exceeds standard; synchronous passivator of 3 ton/ha. per season in the first and second 5. Enrichment coefficient of rice year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third and variety is at middle risk; variety, fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth and sixth year); production or management risk may 5. Strengthen popularization of rice variety with low accumulation of exist. pollutants; 6. Remove straw from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land with the focus on rice and soil; 2. Irrigate with little water and guarantee clean water source; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha.; 4. Apply cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator according to 1. Cd pollution of rice is at middle Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project risk; with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Reducing RCⅢ AⅢ SⅡ O(WⅠD1F1CⅠ) 2. The As pollution in rice is at Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply cadmium and arsenic MⅠ middle risk; synchronous passivator of 3 ton/ha. per season in the first and second 3. Cd pollution of soil is at low risk; year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third and fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth and sixth year); 5. Strengthen popularization of rice variety with low accumulation of pollutants; 6. Remove straw from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 29 Name of Name of village Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures demonstration area 1. There is no risk of Cd pollution in 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land rice; RⅠ SⅠ O(WⅠD1F1CⅠ) MⅠ with the focus on rice and soil; 2. There is no risk of Cd pollution in 2. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha. soil; 1. Cd pollution of rice is at high 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land risk; with the focus on rice and soil; Sanyanqiao 2. There is no risk of Cd pollution in 2. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 3000kg/ha.; Village soil; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha; RⅣ SⅠ O(WⅠD1F1CⅣ) MⅣ 3. Rice straw exceeds standard; 4. waterflooding irrigation, guarantee clean water source; 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice 5. Strengthen popularization of rice variety with low accumulation of variety is at low risk; sedimentation, pollutants; variety or management risk may 6. Remove straw from fields; exist in rice risk except soil. 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land 1. There is no risk of Cd pollution in with the focus on rice and soil; RⅠ SⅡ O(WⅠD1F1CⅠ) MⅠ rice; 2. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 3000kg/ha.; 2. Cd pollution of soil is at low risk; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha; 4. waterflooding irrigation, guarantee clean water source. 1. Cd pollution of rice is at middle 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land risk; with the focus on rice and soil; 2. There is no risk of Cd pollution in 2. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 3000kg/ha.; soil; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 750kg/ha; Liangqiao RⅢ SⅠ O(WⅠD1F1CⅢ ) MⅢ 3. Rice straw exceeds standard; 4. waterflooding irrigation, guarantee clean water source; Village 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice 5. Strengthen popularization of rice variety with low accumulation of variety is at low risk; sedimentation, pollutants; variety or management risk may 6. Remove straw from fields; exist in rice risk except soil. 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land with the focus on rice and soil; 1. The As pollution in rice is at RCⅠ AⅢ SⅡ O(WⅠD1F1CⅠ ) 2. Irrigate with little water and guarantee clean water source; middle risk; MⅠ 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha; 2. Cd pollution of soil is at low risk; 4. Apply cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator according to Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project 30 Name of Name of village Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures demonstration area with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Reducing Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator of 3 ton/ha. per season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third and fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth and sixth year); 5. Remove straw from fields; 6. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land with the focus on rice and soil; 2. Irrigate with little water and guarantee clean water source; 1. Cd pollution of rice is at middle 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha.; risk; 4. Apply cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator according to 2. The As pollution in rice is at Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project middle risk; with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Reducing RCⅢ AⅢ SⅠ O(WⅠD1F1CⅢ ) 3. There is no risk of Cd in soil; Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply cadmium and arsenic MⅢ 4. Rice straw exceeds standard; synchronous passivator of 3 ton/ha. per season in the first and second 5. Enrichment coefficient of rice year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third and variety is at middle risk; variety, fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth and sixth year); production or management risk may 5. Strengthen popularization of rice variety with low accumulation of exist. pollutants; 6. Remove straw from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. There is no risk of Cd pollution in 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land rice; RⅠ SⅠ O(WⅠD1F1CⅠ) MⅠ with the focus on rice and soil; 2. There is no risk of Cd pollution in 2. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha. soil; Guotai 1. Cd pollution of rice is at middle 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land Sanhe Town Neighborhood risk; with the focus on rice and soil; Committee 2. The As pollution in rice is at 2. Irrigate with little water and guarantee clean water source; RCⅢ AⅢ SⅡ O(WⅠD1F1CⅢ) MⅢ middle risk; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha; 3. Cd pollution of soil is at low risk; 4. Apply cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator according to 4. Rice straw exceeds standard; Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project 5. Enrichment coefficient of rice with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Reducing 31 Name of Name of village Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures demonstration area variety is at middle risk; variety, Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply cadmium and arsenic production or management risk may synchronous passivator of 3 ton/ha. per season in the first and second exist. year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third and fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth and sixth year); 5. Strengthen popularization of rice variety with low accumulation of pollutants; 6. Remove straw from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land with the focus on rice and soil; 2. Irrigate with little water and guarantee clean water source; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 750kg/ha.; 4. Apply cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator according to 1. The As pollution in rice is at Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project RCⅠ AⅢ SⅠ O(WⅠD1F1CⅠ) MⅠ middle risk; with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Reducing 3. There is no risk of Cd in soil. Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator of 3 ton/ha. per season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third and fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth and sixth year); 5. Remove straw from fields; 6. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Plant flower and nursery stock; 2. Strengthen monitoring, management and control on heavy metal 1. The As pollution in soil is at pollution in agricultural land; control agricultural inputs with high risk Linkuang Village R？SⅤ O(W？D？F？C？) M？ extremely high risk. level,such as organic fertilizer, etc., from accessing into agricultural land; 3. Remove straw from fields. 32 Table 4-6 Technology Summary of Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project in Zhongfang County Name of Name of demonstrati Scale (ha.) Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village on area 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice is at low risk level and no risk level respectively, and there is only Cd pollution; 1. Optimize field moisture management (waterflooding R(CⅡAⅠ)S(CVAⅠ)O(WⅠD 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk level, and 49.23 irrigation);; ⅠFⅠCⅠ)MⅠ there is only cadmium pollution; 2. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 2700kg/ha. 3. There is no risk of Cd and As pollution in rice straw; 4. It is basically judged as low-risk management area. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice is at high risk level and no risk including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and level respectively, and there is only Cd pollution; cultivation management; 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at high risk level, and there is only R(CⅣAⅠ)S(CVAⅠ)O(WⅠD 2. Optimize field moisture management (waterflooding 34.21 cadmium pollution; ⅠFⅠCⅣ)MⅡ irrigation); Luxi Village 3. Cd in straw exceeds standard and is at high risk; 3. Apply cadmium passivator of 4500kg/ha.; 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is at low risk; 4. Remove straw from fields; 5. It is basically judged as high-risk management area. 5. Management and control of contaminated rice. Luyang 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice is at extremely high risk level Demonstrati and low risk level respectively, and there is only Cd pollution; on Area 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk level, and It is suggested to conduct reconstruction. R(CV AⅠ)S(CVAⅠ)O there is only cadmium pollution; 25.56 Plant flower of 7.5 ha., orchard (orange, pear and plum) of 12.06 (WⅠDⅠFⅠCV )MⅢ 3. Cd in straw exceeds standard and is at extremely high risk; ha. and mugwort leaf of 6 ha. 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is at middle risk; 5. It is basically judged as extremely-high-risk reconstruction area. 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice is at middle risk and low risk 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, level respectively, and there is combined pollution of Cd and As; including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at high risk level, and there is only cultivation management; Heping R(CⅢ AⅡ )S(CVAⅠ)O 54 cadmium pollution; 2. Optimize field moisture management (irrigate with little Village (WⅠDⅠFⅠCⅡ)MⅡ 3. Cd in straw exceeds standard and is at low risk; water); 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is at low risk; 3. Apply Cd and As synchronous passivator of 3000kg/ha.; 5. It is basically judged as middle-risk management area. 4. Management and control of contaminated rice. Xiaping 40 R (CⅢ AⅡ ) S (CVAⅠ) O 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice is at middle risk and low risk 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, 33 Name of Name of demonstrati Scale (ha.) Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village on area Village (WⅠDⅠFⅠCⅡ) MⅡ level respectively, and there is combined pollution of Cd and As; including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk level, and cultivation management; there is only cadmium pollution; 2. Optimize field moisture management (irrigate with little 3. Cd in straw exceeds standard and is at low risk; water); 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is at low risk; 3. Apply Cd and As synchronous passivator of 3000kg/ha.; 5. It is basically judged as middle-risk management area. 4. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice is at middle risk and low risk 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, level respectively, and there is combined pollution of Cd and As; including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk level, and cultivation management; R(CⅢ AⅡ )S(CVAⅠ)O 26.81 there is only cadmium pollution; 2. Optimize field moisture management (irrigate with little (WⅠDⅠFⅠCⅡ)MⅠ 3. Cd in straw exceeds standard and is at low risk; water); 4. There is no risk of enrichment coefficient of rice variety; 3. Apply Cd and As synchronous passivator of 3000kg/ha.; 5. It is basically judged as middle-risk management area. 4. Management and control of contaminated rice. Qiaoshang 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice is at extremely high risk and Village low risk level respectively, and there is combined pollution of Cd and As; 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk level, and R(CV AⅠ )S(CV It is suggested to conduct reconstruction. 19.19 there is only cadmium pollution; AⅠ)O(WⅠDⅠFⅠCⅣ)MⅢ Plant grape and pitaya of 12.19 ha. and mugwort leaf of 7 ha. 3. Cd in straw exceeds standard and is at high risk; 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is at middle risk; 5. It is basically judged as extremely-high-risk reconstruction area. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice is at middle risk level and no including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and risk level respectively, and there is only Cd pollution; cultivation management; R(CⅢ 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk level, and 2. Control of varieties with high accumulation of pollutants; 56.76 AⅠ )S(CVAⅠ)O(WⅠDⅠFⅠ there is only cadmium pollution; 3. Optimize field moisture management; Wuli Village CⅡ)MⅠ 3. Cd in straw exceeds standard and is at low risk; 4. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 4500kg/ha.; 4. There is no risk of enrichment coefficient of rice variety; 5. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 540kg/ha; 5. It is basically judged as middle-risk management area. 6. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 9.24 R(CV AⅠ )S(CV 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice is at extremely high risk level It is suggested to conduct reconstruction. 34 Name of Name of demonstrati Scale (ha.) Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village on area AⅠ)O(WⅠDⅠFⅠCV)MⅢ and no risk level respectively, and there is only Cd pollution; Plant mugwort leaf. 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk level, and there is only cadmium pollution; 3. Cd in straw exceeds standard and is at extremely high risk; 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is at middle risk; 5. It is basically judged as extremely-high-risk reconstruction area. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice is at low risk level and no risk including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and level respectively, and there is only Cd pollution; cultivation management; R(CⅡ 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk level, and Huangjin 2. Control of varieties with high accumulation of pollutants; 40 AⅠ )S(CVAⅠ)O(WⅠDⅠFⅠ there is only cadmium pollution; Village 3. Optimize field moisture management; CⅡ)MⅠ 3. Cd in straw exceeds standard and is at low risk; 4. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 2700kg/ha.; 5. 4. There is no risk of enrichment coefficient of rice variety; Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha. 5. It is basically judged as low-risk management area. 6. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice is at middle risk and low risk including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and level respectively, and there is combined pollution of Cd and As; cultivation management; Xinjian 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk level, and Heihetian R(CⅢAⅡ )S(CVAⅠ)O(WⅠ 2. Control of varieties with high accumulation of pollutants; Demonstrati 40 there is only cadmium pollution; Village DⅠFⅠCⅡ)MⅡ 3. Optimize field moisture management; on Area 3. Cd in straw exceeds standard and is at low risk; 4. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 2700kg/ha.; 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is at low risk; 5. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; 5. It is basically judged as middle-risk management area. 6. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice is at middle risk level and no including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and risk level respectively, and there is only Cd pollution; cultivation management; 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk level, and Xinjian R (CⅢAⅠ ) S (CVAⅠ) O 2. Control of varieties with high accumulation of pollutants; 45 there is only cadmium pollution; Village (WⅠDⅠFⅠCⅢ) MⅡ 3. Optimize field moisture management; 3. Cd in straw exceeds standard and is at middle risk; 4. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 2700kg/ha.; 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is at low risk; 5. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; 5. It is basically judged as middle-risk management area. 6. Management and control of contaminated rice. Tongwan Zhuyuantou 50.4 R (CⅢAⅠ ) S (CVAⅠ) O 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice is at middle risk level and no 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, 35 Name of Name of demonstrati Scale (ha.) Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village on area Demonstrati Village (WⅠDⅠFⅠCⅡ) MⅡ risk level respectively, and there is only Cd pollution; including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and on Area 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at middle risk level, and there is only cultivation management; cadmium pollution; 2. Control of varieties with high accumulation of pollutants; 3. Cd in straw exceeds standard and is at low risk; 3. Optimize field moisture management; 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is at low risk; 4. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 4500kg/ha.; 5. It is basically judged as middle-risk management area. 5. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 5400kg/ha; 6. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; 7. Remove straw from fields; 8. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice is at extremely high risk and low risk level respectively, and there is combined pollution of Cd and As; R(CV AⅡ ) S (CVAⅠ) O 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk level, and It is suggested to conduct reconstruction. 9.6 (WⅠDⅠFⅠCⅣ) MⅢ there is only cadmium pollution; Plant corn 3. Cd in straw exceeds standard and is at high risk; 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is at middle risk; 5. It is basically judged as high-risk management area. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice is at middle risk and low risk including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and level respectively, and there is combined pollution of Cd and As; cultivation management; 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk level, and 2. Control of varieties with high accumulation of pollutants; R (CⅢAⅡ ) S (CVAⅠ)O 50.17 there is only cadmium pollution; 3. Optimize field moisture management; (WⅠDⅠFⅠCⅡ) MⅡ 3. Cd in straw exceeds standard and is at low risk; 4. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 4500kg/ha.; Tongmu 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is at low risk; 5. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 540kg/ha; Fengpo Demonstrati 5. It is basically judged as middle-risk management area. 6. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; Village on Area 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice is at extremely high risk and middle risk level respectively, and there is combined pollution of R (CV AⅢ ) S (CV AⅠ) O Cd and As; It is suggested to conduct reconstruction. 9.83 (WⅠDⅠFⅠCV) MⅣ 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk level, and Plant fruit seedling. there is only cadmium pollution; 3. Cd in straw exceeds standard and is at extremely high risk; 36 Name of Name of demonstrati Scale (ha.) Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village on area 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is at high risk; 5. It is basically judged as extremely-high-risk reconstruction area. 37 Table 4-7 Technology Summary of Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project in Anhua County Name of Name of Scale demonstra Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village (ha.) tion area 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and cultivation management; 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at extremely high risk; 2. Control of varieties with high accumulation of pollutants; 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk; Dongping 3. Optimize field moisture management; Zhongdi 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is extremely high; Demonstrat 80 RvSvO (WIDⅢFICv) MⅢ 4. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 4500kg/ha. Village sedimentation, variety or management risk may exist in rice ion Area 5. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha risk except soil; 6. Apply soil passivator of 7500kg/ha., and it shall be reduced by 4. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. half in the second year; 7. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 8. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at extremely high risk; 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk; Changtang Hezhen 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is extremely high; Demonstrat 85.33 RvSvO(WIDⅢ FICv)MⅠ Reconstruction Village sedimentation, variety or management risk may exist in rice ion Area risk except soil; 4. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and cultivation 1. There is no risk of Ca in rice; 66.54 RISvO(WIDⅢ FICv)MⅠ management; 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk; 2. Optimize field moisture management; 3. Apply soil passivator of 3000kg/ha. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including Qingtang Yushui atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and cultivation Demonstrat 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at extremely high risk; Village management; ion Area 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk; 2. Control of varieties with high accumulation of pollutants; 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is extremely high; 20.79 RvSvO(WIDⅢ FICv)MⅡ 3. Optimize field moisture management; sedimentation, variety or management risk may exist in rice 4. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 1500kg/ha.; risk except soil; 5. Apply soil passivator of 7500kg/ha., and it shall be reduced by 4. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. half in the second year; 6. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 38 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and cultivation management; 2. Optimize field moisture management; 1. There is no risk of Ca in rice; 22.00 RISvO(WIDⅢ FICv)MⅠ 3. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 4500kg/ha.; 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk; 4. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 750kg/ha; 5. Apply soil passivator of 3000kg/ha.; 6. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at extremely high risk; 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk; Jiangnan Bianjiang 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is extremely high; Demonstrat 22.00 RvSvO (WIDⅢ FICv) MⅢ Reconstruction Village sedimentation, variety or management risk may exist in rice ion Area risk except soil; 4. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at extremely high risk, and the atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and cultivation As pollution is at low risk; management; 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk, while 2. Optimize field moisture management (irrigate with appropriate Rcv aⅡScv aⅠO (WIDⅢ FICv) there is no risk of As; 29.33 amount of water); MⅢ 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is extremely high; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 750kg/ha; sedimentation, variety or management risk may exist in rice 4. Apply Cd and As synchronous passivator of 3000kg/ha.; risk except soil; 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 4. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. 6. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and cultivation 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at low risk; management; 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk; 2. Control of varieties with high accumulation of pollutants; Kuixi Kuixi 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is extremely high; 3. Optimize field moisture management; Demonstrat 36.36 RⅡSvO(WIDⅢ FICv)MⅠ Village sedimentation, variety or management risk may exist in rice 4. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 3000kg/ha; ion Area risk except soil; 5. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 750kg/ha; 4. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. 6. Apply soil passivator of 3000kg/ha.; 7. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 8. Management and control of contaminated rice. 39 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and cultivation management; 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at extremely high risk; 2. Control of varieties with high accumulation of pollutants; 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk; 3. Optimize field moisture management; 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is extremely high; 81.82 RvSvO(WIDⅢ FICv)MⅢ 4. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 3000kg/ha; sedimentation, variety or management risk may exist in rice 5. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 750kg/ha; risk except soil; 6. Apply soil passivator of 7500kg/ha., and it shall be reduced by 4. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. half in the second year; 7. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 8. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and cultivation management; 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at extremely high risk; 2. Control of varieties with high accumulation of pollutants; 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk; 3. Optimize field moisture management; 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is extremely high; 63.64 RvSvO(WIDⅢ FICv)MⅢ 4. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 3000kg/ha. sedimentation, variety or management risk may exist in rice 5. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 750kg/ha; risk except soil; 6. Apply soil passivator of 7500kg/ha., and it shall be reduced by 4. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. half in the second year; Muliu 7. Measures of removing straw away from fields; Village 8. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at extremely high risk, and the 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including As pollution is at middle risk; atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and cultivation 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk, while management; Rcv aⅢ Scv aⅠO(WIDⅢ there is no risk of As; 2. Optimize field moisture management (irrigate with appropriate 18.18 FICcv)MⅤ 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is extremely high; amount of water); sedimentation, variety or management risk may exist in rice 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 750kg/ha; risk except soil; 4. Apply Cd and As synchronous passivator of 3000kg/ha.; 4. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. 5. Management and control of contaminated rice. 40 Table 4-8 Technology Summary of Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project in Hengnan County Name of Name of Small Scale demonstrat Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village Area (ha.) ion area RCⅠAⅠSCⅠAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅠ) 1. Rice: there is no risk of Cd and As pollution; 1. Further monitor main risk factors of rice pollution, 1 5.280 MⅠ 2. Soil: there is no risk of Cd and As pollution. including atmospheric sedimentation and crop variety, etc. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and 1. Rice: the Cd pollution is at extremely high risk, and cultivation management; there is no risk of As; however, the monitoring value of 2. Optimize field moisture management (waterflooding Cd in one point location in the area is 2.1mg/kg, which irrigation); shall be focused with special attention during the RCⅤAⅠSCⅤAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅤAⅠ) 3.Soil acidification conditioning; apply lime of 2250kg/ha. 2 26.400 implementation period; MⅡ in the first year and it shall be reduced half in the second 2. Soil: the Cd pollution is at extremely high risk, and year; there is no risk of As; 4. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha; 3. Rice straw: Cd exceeds standard, while As is within 5. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; the scope of standard. 6. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. Qishan Qishan 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, Demonstrati Village 1. Rice: there is no risk of the Cd pollution, and the As including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and on Area pollution is at low risk; cultivation management; RCⅠAⅡSCⅤAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅡ) 3 15.840 2. Soil: the Cd pollution is at extremely high risk, and 2. Optimize field moisture management (irrigate with little MⅠ there is no risk of As; water); 3. Rice straw: As exceeds standard. 3. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; 4. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, 1. Rice: the Cd pollution is at extremely high risk, and including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and the As pollution is at low risk; cultivation management; 2. Soil: the Cd pollution is at extremely high risk, and 2. Actively popularize variety with low accumulation of RCⅤAⅡSCⅤAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅤAⅡ) there is no risk of As; 4 21.120 pollutants; MⅢ 3. Both Cd and As in rice straw exceed standard; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha; 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is pretty high; 4. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; pollution risk brought by variety or management 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields; measures may exist in rice. 6. Management and control of contaminated rice. Quanhu Qitang 1 22.550 RCⅠAⅠSCⅠAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅠ) 1. Rice: there is no risk of Cd and As pollution; 1. Further monitor main risk factors of rice pollution, 41 Name of Name of Small Scale demonstrat Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village Area (ha.) ion area Demonstrati Village MⅠ 2. Soil: there is no risk of Cd and As pollution. including atmospheric sedimentation and crop variety, etc. on Area 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and 1. Rice: the Cd pollution is at high risk, and there is no cultivation management; risk of As; 2. Actively popularize variety with low accumulation of 2. Soil: there is no risk of Cd and As pollution. pollutants; RCⅣAⅠSCⅠAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅣAⅠ) 2 22.550 3. Rice straw: Cd exceeds standard; 3. Optimize field moisture management (waterflooding MⅢ 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is pretty high; irrigation); pollution risk brought by variety or management 4. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha; measures may exist in rice. 5. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; 6. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and 1. Rice: there is no risk of Cd pollution, and As cultivation management; pollution is at middle risk; RCⅠAⅢSCⅡAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅢ) 2. Optimize field moisture management (irrigate with little 3 37.570 2. Soil: the Cd pollution is at low risk, and there is no MⅠ water); risk of As; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha; 3. Rice straw: As exceeds standard. 4. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, 1. Rice: the Cd pollution is at low risk, and As pollution including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and RCⅡAⅢSCⅠAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅡAⅢ) is at middle risk; cultivation management; 4 15.030 MⅡ 2. Soil: there is no risk of Cd and As pollution; 2. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha; 3. Both Cd and As in rice straw exceed standard; 3. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; 4. Measures of removing straw away from fields. 1. Rice: there is no risk of Cd and As pollution; RCⅠAⅠSCⅣAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅠ) 1. Further monitor main risk factors of rice pollution, 1 20.058 2. Soil: the Cd pollution is at high risk, and there is no MⅠ including atmospheric sedimentation and crop variety, etc. Lijiang risk of As; Jiepai Demonstrati 1. Rice: the Cd pollution is at extremely high risk, and 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, Village on Area RCⅤAⅠSCⅢAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅤAⅠ) there is no risk of As; including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and 2 5.014 MⅤ 2. Soil: the Cd pollution is at middle risk, and there is cultivation management; no risk of As; 2. Actively popularize variety with low accumulation of 42 Name of Name of Small Scale demonstrat Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village Area (ha.) ion area 3. Rice straw: Cd exceeds standard. pollutants; 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is pretty high; 3. Optimize field moisture management (waterflooding pollution risk brought by variety or management irrigation); measures may exist in rice. 4. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha; 5. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; 6. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and 1. Rice: there is no risk of Cd pollution, and As cultivation management; pollution is at high risk; 2. Optimize field moisture management (irrigate with little RCⅠAⅣSCⅢAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅣ) 3 40.114 2. Soil: the Cd pollution is at middle risk, and there is water); MⅠ no risk of As; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha; 3. Rice straw: As exceeds standard. 4. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 6. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Rice: the Cd pollution is at extremely high risk, and the As pollution is at middle risk; however, the 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, monitoring value of Cd in one point location in the area including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and is 2.2mg/kg, which shall be focused with special cultivation management; attention during the implementation period; 2. Actively popularize variety with low accumulation of RCⅤAⅢSCⅢAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅤAⅢ) 4 40.114 2. Soil: the Cd pollution is at middle risk, and there is pollutants; MⅣ no risk of As; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha; 3. Both Cd and As in rice straw exceed standard; 4. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is pretty high; 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields; pollution risk brought by variety or management 6. Management and control of contaminated rice. measures may exist in rice. 1. Rice: there is no risk of Cd and As pollution; 1. Further monitor main dangerous elementsrisk factors of RCⅠAⅠSCⅢAⅠO 1 28.620 2. Soil: the Cd pollution is at middle risk, and there is rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation and Xiangyang (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅠ) MⅠ Suhu no risk of As. crop variety, etc. Demonstrati Village 1. Rice: the Cd pollution is at extremely high risk, and 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, on Area RCⅤAⅠSCⅤAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅤAⅠ) 2 17.160 there is no risk of As; however, the monitoring value of including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and MⅣ Cd in one point location in the area is 1.7 mg/kg, which cultivation management; 43 Name of Name of Small Scale demonstrat Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village Area (ha.) ion area shall be focused with special attention during the 2. Optimize field moisture management (waterflooding implementation period; irrigation); 2. Soil: the Cd pollution is at extremely high risk, and 3. Soil acidification conditioning; apply lime of 2250kg/ha. there is no risk of As; in the first year and it shall be reduced half in the second 3. Rice straw: Cd exceeds standard; year; 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is pretty high; 4. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha; pollution risk brought by variety or management 5. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; measures may exist in rice. 6. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 7. Actively popularize variety with low accumulation of pollutants; 8. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, 1. Rice: there is no risk of the Cd pollution, and the As including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and pollution is at low risk; cultivation management; RCⅠAⅡSCⅢAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅡ) 3 28.620 2. Soil: the Cd pollution is at middle risk, and there is 2. Optimize field moisture management (irrigate with little MⅠ no risk of As; water); 3. Rice straw: As exceeds standard. 3. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; 4. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha. 1. Rice: there is no risk of Cd and As pollution; 1. Further monitor main dangerous elementsrisk factors of RCⅠAⅠSCⅢAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅠ) 1 12.983 2. Soil: the Cd pollution is at middle risk, and there is rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation and MⅠ no risk of As. crop variety, etc. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and 1. Rice: the Cd pollution is at extremely high risk, and cultivation management; there is no risk of As; 2. Actively popularize variety with low accumulation of Zhushan 2. Soil: the Cd pollution is at extremely high risk, and pollutants; Village RCⅤAⅠSCⅤAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅤAⅠ) there is no risk of As; 2 12.983 3. Optimize field moisture management (waterflooding MⅢ 3. Rice straw: Cd exceeds standard; irrigation); 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is pretty high; 4. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha; pollution risk brought by variety or management 5. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; measures may exist in rice. 6. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 3 51.934 RCⅠAⅢSCⅤAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅢ) 1. Rice: there is no risk of Cd pollution, and As 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, 44 Name of Name of Small Scale demonstrat Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village Area (ha.) ion area MⅠ pollution is at middle risk;; including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and 2. Soil: the Cd pollution is at extremely high risk, and cultivation management; there is no risk of As; 2. Optimize field moisture management (irrigate with little 3. Rice straw: As exceeds standard. water); 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha; 4. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and cultivation management; 1. Rice: the Cd pollution is at extremely high risk, and 2. Optimize field moisture management (waterflooding there is no risk of As; irrigation); 2. Soil: the Cd pollution is at high risk, and there is no 3. Soil acidification conditioning; apply lime of 2250kg/ha. RCⅤAⅠSCⅣAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅤAⅠ) risk of As; in the first year and it shall be reduced half in the second 1 13.110 MⅣ 3. Rice straw: Cd exceeds standard; year; 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is pretty high; 4. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha; pollution risk brought by variety or management 5. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; measures may exist in rice. 6. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated rice; Xiantang 8. Actively popularize variety with low accumulation of Changtang Demonstrati pollutants. Village on Area 1. Further monitor main dangerous elementsrisk factors of RCⅠAⅠSCⅠAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅠ) 1. Rice: there is no risk of Cd and As pollution; 2 6.554 rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation and MⅠ 2. Soil: there is no risk of Cd and As pollution. crop variety, etc. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and 1. Rice: there is no risk of Cd pollution, and As cultivation management; pollution is at middle risk;; RCⅠAⅢSCⅢAⅣO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅢ) 2. Optimize field moisture management (irrigate with little 3 26.218 2. Soil: the Cd pollution is at middle risk, and the As MⅠ water); pollution is at high risk;; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha; 3. Rice straw: As exceeds standard. 4. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 4 26.218 RCⅣAⅡSCⅠAⅡO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅣAⅡ) 1. Rice: the Cd pollution is at high risk, and As 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, 45 Name of Name of Small Scale demonstrat Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village Area (ha.) ion area MⅢ pollution is at low risk;; including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and 2. Soil: there is no risk of Cd pollution, and the As cultivation management; pollution is at low risk;; 2. Actively popularize variety with low accumulation of 3. Both Cd and As in rice straw exceed standard; pollutants; 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is pretty high; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha; pollution risk brought by variety or management 4. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; measures may exist in rice. 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 6. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Rice: there is no risk of Cd and As pollution; 1. Further monitor main dangerous elementsrisk factors of RCⅠAⅠSCⅠAⅤO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅠ) 1 41.250 2. Soil: there is no risk of Cd pollution, and the As rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation and MⅠ pollution is at extremely high risk. crop variety, etc. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and 1. Rice: there is no risk of Cd pollution, and As cultivation management; pollution is at middle risk;; RCⅠAⅢSCⅠAⅡO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅢ) 2. Optimize field moisture management (irrigate with little 2 25.781 2. Soil: there is no risk of Cd pollution, and the As MⅠ water); pollution is at low risk;; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha. Maiyuan 3. Rice straw: As exceeds standard. 4. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; Village 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields. Huaqiao 1. Rice: the Cd pollution is at low risk, and As pollution 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, Demonstrati is at middle risk; including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and on Area 2. Soil: there is no risk of Cd pollution, and the As cultivation management; RCⅡAⅢSCⅠAⅡO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅡAⅢ) pollution is at low risk;; 2. Actively popularize variety with low accumulation of 3 15.469 MⅢ 3. Both Cd and As in rice straw exceed standard; pollutants; 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is pretty high; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha. pollution risk brought by variety or management 4. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; measures may exist in rice. 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, 1. Rice: the Cd pollution is at middle risk, and there is including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and no risk of As; Liushun RCⅢAⅠSCⅤAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅡAⅠ) cultivation management; 1 11.670 2. Soil: the Cd pollution is at extremely high risk, and Village MⅠ 2. Optimize field moisture management (waterflooding there is no risk of As; irrigation); 3. Rice straw: Ca exceeds standard; 3. Soil acidification conditioning; apply lime of 2250kg/ha. 46 Name of Name of Small Scale demonstrat Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village Area (ha.) ion area in the first year and it shall be reduced half in the second year; 4. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha. 5. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; 6. Measures of removing straw away from fields. 1. Rice: there is no risk of Cd and As pollution; 1. Further monitor main dangerous elementsrisk factors of RCⅠAⅠSCⅠAⅤO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅠ) 2 5.830 2. Soil: there is no risk of Cd pollution, and the As rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation and MⅡ pollution is at high risk. crop variety, etc. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and 1. Rice: there is no risk of the Cd pollution, and the As cultivation management; RCⅠAⅡSCⅠAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅡ) pollution is at low risk; 3 52.500 2. Optimize field moisture management (irrigate with little MⅠ 2. Soil: there is no risk of Cd and As pollution. water); 3. Rice straw: As exceeds standard. 3. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; 4. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and 1. Rice: the Cd pollution is at extremely high risk, and cultivation management; there is no risk of As; 2. Optimize field moisture management (waterflooding RCⅤAⅠSCⅤAⅤO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅤAⅠ) 1 35.108 2. Soil: the Cd pollution is at extremely high risk, and irrigation); MⅡ the As pollution is at extremely high risk; 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha; 3. Rice straw: Ca exceeds standard; 4. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields; Chashi Lianhua 6. Management and control of contaminated rice. Town Village 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and 1. Rice: there is no risk of Cd pollution, and As cultivation management; RCⅠAⅢSCⅠAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅢ) pollution is at middle risk;; 2. Optimize field moisture management (irrigate with little 2 7.023 MⅠ 2. Soil: there is no risk of Cd and As pollution. water); 3. Rice straw: As exceeds standard. 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha; 4. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields. 3 56.169 RCⅤAⅢSCⅤAⅡO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅤAⅢ) 1. Rice: the Cd pollution is at extremely high risk, and 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, 47 Name of Name of Small Scale demonstrat Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village Area (ha.) ion area MⅢ the As pollution is at middle risk; however, the including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and monitoring value of Cd in one point location in the area cultivation management; is 1.9 mg/kg, which shall be focused with special 2. Actively popularize variety with low accumulation of attention during the implementation period; pollutants; 2. Soil: the Cd pollution is at extremely high risk, and 3. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha; the As pollution is at low risk; 4. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; 3. Both Cd and As in rice straw exceed standard; 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is pretty high; 6. Management and control of contaminated rice. pollution risk brought by variety or management measures may exist in rice. 1. Further monitor main dangerous elementsrisk factors of RCⅠAⅠSCⅠAⅠO(WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅠ) 1. Rice: there is no risk of Cd and As pollution; 1 29.455 rice pollution, including atmospheric sedimentation and MⅠ 2 Soil: there is no risk of Cd and As pollution. crop variety, etc. 1. Further find out the main risk factors of rice pollution, Jiangkou Sanping including atmospheric sedimentation, variety of crops and Demonstrati 1. Rice: there is no risk of the Cd pollution, and the As Village cultivation management; on Area RCⅠAⅡSCⅠAⅠO pollution is at low risk; 2 51.545 2. Optimize field moisture management (irrigate with little (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅡ) MⅠ 2. Soil: there is no risk of Cd and As pollution. water); 3. Rice straw: As exceeds standard. 3. Apply soil passivator of 4500kg/ha.; 4. Apply commercial organic fertilizer of 600kg/ha. 48 Table 4-9 Technology Summary of Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project in Yizhang County Name of demonst Name of Scale Identification of Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures ration village (ha.) demonstration area area 1. Both Cd and As pollution in rice are at low risk, and there is the compound pollution of Cd and As; Group 5, Group 7, R(CⅡAⅡ)S(CⅴAⅡ) 2. The Cd and As pollution in soil are at extremely 1. Optimize field moisture management; Group 16, Group 15 80.31 O high risk and low risk respectively, and there is the 2. Apply soil cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator of and Group 18 of (WⅠDⅴFⅠCⅡ)MⅠ compound pollution of Cd and As; 3 tons/ha. Meitian Village 3. The Cd pollution in rice straw is at low risk; 4. Atmospheric pollution is at extremely high risk. 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice is at extremely Meitian high risk level and no risk level respectively, and Village there is only Cd pollution; 1. Optimize field moisture management; 2. The Cd and As pollution in soil are at extremely 2.Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 2.25 R(CⅴAⅠ)S(CⅴAⅠ) Group 11, Group 12 & high risk and no risk respectively, and there is only Meitian tons/ha. 40.16 O Group 16 of Meitian Cd pollution; Town 3. Apply soil cadmium passivator of 3 tons/ha. (WⅠDⅴFⅠCⅴ)MⅡ Village 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is at low Demonst 4. Management and control of contaminated rice; risk; ration 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields. 4. The Cd pollution in rice straw is at extremely Area high risk; 5. Atmospheric pollution is at extremely high risk. 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at middle risk and As pollution is at low risk, and there is the compound pollution of Cd and As; 2. The Cd and As pollution in soil are at 1. Optimize field moisture management; R(CⅢAⅡ)S(Cⅴ Group 3, Group 5, Huangshi extremely high risk and high risk respectively, and 2. Apply soil cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator of 30.00 AⅣ)O Group 7 and Group 8 of Village there is the compound pollution of Cd and As; 3 tons/ha. (WⅠDⅴFⅠCⅢ)MⅠ Huangshi Village 3. The enrichment coefficient of rice is at no risk; 3. Measures of removing straw away from fields. 4. The Cd pollution in rice straw is at middle risk; 5. Atmospheric pollution is at extremely high risk. Wuling Raotian R(CⅡAⅢ)S(Cⅴ Group 4, Group 5, 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice are at low risk 1. Optimize field moisture management; 41 Town Village AⅠ)O Group 7, Group 8, and and middle risk respectively, and there is the 2. Apply soil cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator of 49 Demonst (WⅠDⅴFⅠCⅡ)MⅠ Group 11 of Raotian compound pollution of Cd and As; 3 tons/ha. ration Village 2. The Cd and As pollution in soil are at extremely Area high risk and no risk respectively, and there is only Cd pollution; 3. There is no risk of enrichment coefficient of rice variety; 4. The Cd and As pollution in rice straw are at low risk; 5. Atmospheric pollution is at extremely high risk. 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice are at no risk and low risk respectively, and there is only As pollution; 2. The Cd and As pollution in soil are at extremely R(CⅠAⅡ)S(Cⅴ high risk and no risk respectively, and there is only 1. Optimize field moisture management; Group 13 of Raotian 23.43 AⅠ)O Cd pollution; 2. Apply soil arsenic passivator of 3 tons/ha. Village (WⅠDⅴFⅠCⅠ)MⅠ 3. There is no risk of enrichment coefficient of rice variety; 4. The Cd and As pollution in rice straw are at low risk; 5. Atmospheric pollution is at extremely high risk. 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice are at extremely high risk and low risk respectively, and there is the compound pollution of Cd and As; 2. The Cd and As pollution in soil are at R(CⅴAⅡ)S(Cⅴ extremely high risk and low risk respectively, and Group 2 and Group 6 of 23.43 AⅡ)O there is the compound pollution of Cd and As; Plant corns. Raotian Village (WⅠDⅴFⅠCⅴ)MⅢ 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is at middle risk; variety or management risk may exist in rice risk except soil; 4. The Cd and As pollution in rice straw are at extremely high risk. 1. Both Cd and As pollution in rice are at low risk, and there is the compound pollution of Cd and R(CⅠAⅢ)S(CⅢAⅠ) Group 2, Group 5 and 1. Optimize field moisture management; Taipingli As; 39.47 O Group 13 of Taipingli 2. Apply soil cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator of Village 2. The Cd and As pollution in soil are at high risk (WⅠDⅴFⅠCⅠ)MⅠ Village 3 tons/ha. and no risk respectively, and there is only Cd pollution; 50 3. There is no risk of enrichment coefficient of rice variety; 4. The Cd and As pollution in rice straw are at low risk; 5. Atmospheric pollution is at extremely high risk. 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice are at middle risk and low risk respectively, and there is the compound pollution of Cd and As; Group 4, Group 8, 2. The Cd and As pollution in soil are at high risk 1. Optimize field moisture management; R(CⅢAⅡ)S(CⅣAⅠ) Group 9, Group 10, and no risk respectively, and there is only Cd 2. Apply soil cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator of 24.67 O Group 11, Group 12, pollution; 3 tons/ha. (WⅠDⅴFⅠCⅡ)MⅡ Group 14, and Group 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is at low 3. Measures of removing straw away from fields. 17 of Taipingli Village risk; 4. The Cd and As pollution in rice straw are at low risk; 5. Atmospheric pollution is at extremely high risk. 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice is at extremely high risk level and no risk level respectively, and there is only Cd pollution; 2. The Cd and As pollution in soil are at high risk 1. Optimize field moisture management; and no risk respectively, and there is only Cd 2. Soil acidification conditioning and apply lime of 3 ton/ha.; R(CⅴAⅠ)S(CⅴAⅠ) Group 3, Group 7 and pollution; 3. Apply soil cadmium passivator of 3 tons/ha. 34.53 O Group 16 of Taipingli 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is at high 4. Management and control of contaminated rice; (WⅠDⅴFⅠCⅴ)MⅣ Village risk; management risk may exist in rice risk except 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields; soil; 6. Rice variety with low accumulation of pollutants. 4. The Cd pollution in rice straw is at extremely high risk; 5. Atmospheric pollution is at extremely high risk. 1. Both the Cd and As pollution in rice are at low risk, and there is the compound pollution of Cd and As; R(CⅡAⅡ)S(CⅢAⅠ) Group 1, Group 2, 1. Optimize field moisture management; Dengjiawan 2. The Cd and As pollution in soil are at middle risk 19.48 O Group 3 and Group 4 of 2. Apply soil cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator of Village and no risk respectively, and there is only Cd (WⅠDⅴFⅠCⅡ)MⅡ Dengjiawan Village 3 tons/ha. pollution; 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is at low risk; 51 4. The Cd and As pollution in rice straw are at low risk; 5. Atmospheric pollution is at extremely high risk. 1. There is no risk of Cd and As pollution in rice; 2. Both Cd and As pollution in soil are at low risk; Group 6, Group 8, 1.Optimize field moisture management; R(CⅠAⅠ)S(CⅡAⅡ) 3. There is no risk of enrichment coefficient of rice Group 9, Group 13 and 2. Apply soil cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator of 58.45 O variety; Group 15 of 3 tons/ha. (WⅠDⅴFⅠCⅠ)MⅠ 4. There is no risk of Cd and As pollution in rice Dengjiawan Village 3. Strengthen monitoring. straw; 5. Atmospheric pollution is at extremely high risk. 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice are at extremely high risk level and no risk level respectively, and there is only Cd pollution; 1.Optimize field moisture management; Yiliu 2. The Cd and As pollution in rice are at extremely 2. Apply soil cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator of Town R(CⅴAⅠ)S(CⅣAⅡ) Group 2, Group 3, high risk and low risk respectively, and there is the Shijietou 3 tons/ha. Demonst 63.33 O Group 4 and Group 5 of compound pollution of Cd and As; Village 3. Management and control of contaminated rice; ration (WⅠDⅴFⅠCⅴ)MⅣ Shijietou Village 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is at high 4. Measures of removing straw away from fields; Area risk; 5. Rice variety with low accumulation of pollutants. 4. The Cd and As pollution in rice straw are at extremely high risk; 5. Atmospheric pollution is at extremely high risk. 52 Table 4-10 Technology Summary of Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project in Linwu County Name of Name of Small Scale demonstr Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village Area (ha.) ation area 1. There is no risk of Cd pollution in rice and the As pollution is at middle risk, 1. Optimize field moisture management; and there is only As pollution; 2. Apply soil cadmium and arsenic R(CⅠAⅢ)S(CⅴAⅣ)O 2. The Cd and As pollution in rice are at extremely high risk and high risk 1 29.49 synchronous passivator of 3000kg/ha. (WⅠDⅢFⅠCⅣ)MⅠ respectively, and there is the compound pollution of Cd and As; 3. Measures of removing straw away from 3.There is no risk of enrichment coefficient of rice variety; fields. 4. The Cd pollution in rice straw is at extremely high risk. Wushui Chengtou 1. The Cd and As pollution in rice are at extremely high risk and low risk Town Village respectively, and there is the compound pollution of Cd and As; 2. The Cd and As pollution in soil are at extremely high risk and low risk R(CⅴAⅡ)S(CⅴAⅡ)O 2 39.31 respectively, and there is the compound pollution of Cd and As; Reconstruction. Corns. (WⅠDⅢFⅠCⅢ)MⅢ 3.Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is at middle risk; variety or management risk may exist in rice risk except soil; 4. The As pollution in rice straw is at middle risk. 1. There is no risk of Cd pollution in rice and the As pollution is at middle risk; 1. Optimize field moisture management; 2. The Cd and As pollution in soil are at no risk and low risk respectively, there Wenxi R(CⅠAⅢ)S(CⅠ AⅡ)O 2. Apply arsenic passivator of 3000kg/ha.; 3 45.8 is only As pollution; Village (WⅠDⅢFⅠCⅢ)MⅠ 3. Measures of removing straw away from 3.. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is at middle risk; fields. 4. The As pollution in rice straw is at middle risk. 1. There is no risk of Cd pollution in rice and the As pollution is at middle risk; 1. Optimize field moisture management Nanqiang Tiantou R(CⅠAⅢ)S(CⅠAⅡ)O 2. The Cd and As pollution in soil are at no risk and low risk respectively; 4 38.6 (irrigate with little water); Town Village (WⅠDⅢFⅠCⅠ)MⅠ 3.There is no risk of enrichment coefficient of rice variety; 2. Apply arsenic passivator of 3000kg/ha. 4. The As pollution in rice straw is at low risk. 1. There is no risk of Cd pollution in rice and the As pollution is at middle risk, and there is only As pollution; 1. Optimize field moisture management Liantang R(CⅠAⅢ)S(CⅠAⅠ)O 5 103 2. There is no risk of Cd and As pollution in soil; (irrigate with little water); Village (WⅠDⅢFⅠCⅠ)MⅠ 3. There is no risk of enrichment coefficient of rice variety; 2. Apply arsenic passivator of 3000kg/ha. 4. The As pollution in rice straw is at low risk. 53 Table 4-11 Technology Summary of Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project in Lengshuitan District Name of demonstration Scale (ha.) Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures area 1. Optimize filed moisture management with little water 1. The As pollution in rice is at low risk; the Cd Leihuazhu irrigation; wet irrigation and dry and wet alternative method is content at 1 point in Group 5 and 6 in ang Area adopted; RCⅠAⅡSCⅠAⅠ O (WⅠDⅡFⅠCC Leihuangzhuang is above 0.9 mg/kg respectively in 53.34 2. Increase application of soil passivator, reduce As activity in ⅠAⅠ ) MⅡ with Cd pollution risk; Xianghuab soil; apply 3t/ha. per season; 2. There is no risk for soil Cd pollution while it is at a Village 3. Management and control of contaminated rice; the boundary with potential risk. 4. Management and control of farmland sediment. Xianghuab 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at middle risk; As in 6 a Village point locations among 20 in rice agricultural product 1. Optimize filed moisture management with flood water Demonstra samplea exceeds standard with potential As irrigation; tion Area Qunyongxi pollution; 2. Increase application of soil passivator with the amount of anghua RCⅢAⅠSCⅢAⅠO（WⅠDⅡFⅠCc 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at middle risk; 4.5t/ha. in the first and fourth years and 2.25t/ha. in the second, Area in 120 ⅣAⅠ ）MⅡ 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is at low third and fifth years; Xianghuab risk; variety, production and management risk may 3. Management and control of contaminated rice; a Village exist in rice risk except soil; 4. Management and control of farmland sediment; 4. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard and is at middle 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields. risk. 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at middle risk; 1. Further clear main risk factors in rice pollution, including Shixijiang Shixijiang 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at high risk; atmospheric sedimentation, crop variety and cultivation Village Village RCⅢAⅠSCⅣAⅠO（WⅠDⅡFⅠCC 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is at low management; Demonstra 175.66 Demonstra ⅢAⅠ ）MⅡ risk; variety, production and management risk may 2. Optimize filed moisture management with flood water tion Area tion Area exist in rice risk except soil; irrigation; (1) 4. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard and is at middle 3. Soil acidification conditioning; apply lime of 2.25t/ha. in the 54 risk. first and second years; the application amount shall be 1.125t/ha. in the third and forth years; the application shall be stopped in the fifth year; 4. Apply commercial fertilizer of 0.6t/ha. each year during the project implementation period; 5. Increase application of soil passivator with the amount of 4.5t/ha. in the first and fourth year and 2.25t/ha. in the second, third and fifth years; 6. Management and control of contaminated rice; 7. Management and control of farmland sediment; 8. Measures of removing straw away from fields. 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at extremely high risk; Shixijiang 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at extremely high risk; Village 3. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is at RCⅤAⅠSCⅤAⅠO（WⅠDⅡFⅠCC Demonstra 11 extremely high risk; sedimentation, variety or Restructuring. ⅤAⅠ ）MⅤ tion Area management risk may exist in rice risk except soil; (2) 4. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard and is at extremely high risk. 1. Optimize filed moisture management with little water irrigation; wet irrigation and dry and wet alternative method is adopted; Lishan 2. Apply commercial fertilizer of 0.6t/ha. each year during the Village Lishan RCⅠAⅡSCⅢAⅠO（WⅠDⅡFⅠCC 1. The As pollution in rice is at low risk; 100 project implementation period; Demonstra Village ⅠAⅠ ）MⅡ 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at middle risk. 3. Increase application of soil passivator, reduce As activity in tion Area soil; apply 3t/ha. each season; 4. Management and control of contaminated rice; 5. Management and control of farmland sediment. Qishan Qishan 140 RCⅠAⅡSCⅠAⅠO（WⅠDⅡFⅠCC 1. The As pollution in rice is at low risk. 1. Optimize filed moisture management with little water 55 Village Village ⅠAⅠ）MⅡ irrigation; wet irrigation and dry and wet alternative method is Demonstra adopted; tion Area 2. Apply commercial fertilizer of 0.6t/ha. each year during the project implementation period; 3. Increase application of soil passivator, reduce As activity in soil; apply 3t/ha. each season; 4. Management and control of contaminated rice; 5. Management and control of farmland sediment. 56 Table 4-12 Technology Summary of Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project in Qiyang County Name of Name of Scale demonstrat Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village (ha.) ion area RCⅠAⅠ SCⅠAⅠO 1. There is no risk of the Cd and As pollution; Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land 20.00 (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅠ) 2. There is no risk of Cd and As in soil; and management and control of Cd and As balance; MⅠ 1. Popularize low accumulated rice variety; 2. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at middle risk, while Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project with there is no risk of As; World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Adjusting Acid and RCⅢAⅠ SCⅠAⅠO 2. There is no risk of Cd and As in soil; Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 3.75 ton/ha 30.00 (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅢAⅠ) 3. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. per season in the first and second year; the application amount shall MⅢ 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is pretty high; be reduced by half in the third and forth year; the application shall pollution risk brought by variety or management be stopped in the fifth year); Xiaojia Niutouwan measures may exist in rice 3. waterflooding irrigation; Demonstrati Village 4. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 5. Management on Area and control of contaminated rice. 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at extremely high risk; 1. Popularize low accumulated rice variety; among them, the monitoring value of As in one point 2. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan location is 0.262 mg/kg with potential risk, which Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project with shall be focused with special attention during the World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Adjusting Acid and RCⅤAⅠ SCⅠAⅠO implementation period; Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 3 ton/ha per 103.33 (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅤAⅠ) 2. There is no risk of Cd and As in soil; season in the first and second year; the application amount shall be MⅤ 3. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. reduced by half in the third and forth year; the application shall be 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is pretty high; stopped in the fifth year); pollution risk brought by variety or management 4. Apply passivator according to Hunan Integrated Management of measures may exist in rice. Agricultural Land Pollution Project with World Bank Loan: 57 Name of Name of Scale demonstrat Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village (ha.) ion area Technical Specifications for Reducing Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply passivator of 4.5 tons /ha. per season in the first and second year of project implementation; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third and fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth year); 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 6. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Popularize low accumulated rice variety; 2. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at low risk, while there is Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project with no risk of As; World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Adjusting Acid and RCⅡAⅠ SCⅠAⅠO 2. There is no risk of Cd and As in soil; Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 3.75 ton/ha 15.69 (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅡAⅠ)M 3. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. per season in the first and second year; the application amount shall Ⅳ 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is pretty high; be reduced by half in the third and forth year; the application shall pollution risk brought by variety or management be stopped in the fifth year); Niuling measures may exist in rice 3. waterflooding irrigation; Village 4. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 5. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at high risk, while the As 1. Popularize low accumulated rice variety; pollution is at middle risk; 2. Apply cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator according to RCⅣAⅢ SCⅠAⅠ O 2. There is no risk of Cd and As in soil; Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution 47.06 (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅣAⅢ)M 3. Both Cd and As in rice straw exceed standard; Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for V 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is pretty high; Reducing Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply cadmium and pollution risk brought by variety or management arsenic synchronous passivator of 4.5 tons /ha. per season in the first measures may exist in rice and second year of project implementation; the application amount 58 Name of Name of Scale demonstrat Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village (ha.) ion area shall be reduced by half in the third and fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth year); 3. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 4. Management and control of contaminated rice; 5. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land and management and control of Cd and As balance; RCⅠAⅠ SCⅠAⅠO 1. There is no risk of the Cd and As pollution; Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land 23.53 (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅠ)M 2. There is no risk of Cd and As in soil; and management and control of Cd and As balance; Ⅰ 1. Popularize low accumulated rice variety; 2. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at low risk, while there is Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project with no risk of As; World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Adjusting Acid and 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at low risk, while there is RCⅡAⅠ SCⅡAⅠO Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 3.75 ton/ha. no risk of As; 34.77 (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅢAⅠ)M per season in the first and second year; the application amount shall 3. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. Ⅲ be reduced by half in the third and forth year; the application shall 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is pretty high; Jinxing be stopped in the fifth year); pollution risk brought by variety or management Village 3. waterflooding irrigation; measures may exist in rice 4. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 5. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at low risk, and the As 1. Popularize low accumulated rice variety; RCⅡAⅢ SCⅢAⅠ O pollution is at middle risk; 2. Apply cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator according to 13.69 (WⅠDⅢFⅠCCⅣAⅠ)M 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at middle risk, while Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Ⅰ there is no risk of As; Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for 3. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard, while As does Reducing Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply cadmium and 59 Name of Name of Scale demonstrat Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village (ha.) ion area not. arsenic synchronous passivator of 4.5 tons /ha. per season in the first and second year of project implementation; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third and fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth year); 3. waterflooding irrigation; 4. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 5. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Popularize low accumulated rice variety; 2. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Adjusting Acid and Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 3 ton/ha. 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at extremely high risk, per season in the first and second year; the application amount shall while there is no risk of As; be reduced by half in the third and forth year; the application shall 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at low risk, while there is be stopped in the fifth year); RCⅤAⅠ SCⅡAⅠO no risk of As; 3. waterflooding irrigation; 40.54 (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅤAⅠ)M 3. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. 4. Apply cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator according to Ⅴ 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is pretty high; Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution pollution risk brought by variety or management Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for measures may exist in rice. Reducing Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator of 4.5 tons /ha. per season in the first and second year of project implementation; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third and fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth year); 5. Apply commercial organic fertilizer: the application amount is 1.5 60 Name of Name of Scale demonstrat Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village (ha.) ion area tons/ha per season; 6. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Popularize low accumulated rice variety; 2. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at middle risk, while Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project with there is no risk of As; World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Adjusting Acid and 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at low risk, while there is Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 3.75 ton/ha. RCⅢAⅠ SCⅡAⅠ O no risk of As; per season in the first and second year; the application amount shall Wangjiaping 98.33 (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅡAⅠ)M 3. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard, while As does be reduced by half in the third and forth year; the application shall Village Ⅲ not; be stopped in the fifth year); 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is pretty high; 3. waterflooding irrigation; pollution risk brought by variety or management 4. Apply commercial organic fertilizer: the application amount is 1.5 measures may exist in rice. tons/ha per season; 5. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 6. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Popularize low accumulated rice variety; 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at extremely high risk, 2. Soil acidification conditioning: apply lime based on Hunan while there is no risk of As; Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project with Baishui 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at low risk, while there is RCⅤAⅠ SCⅡAⅠO World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Adjusting Acid and Town Xinzhong no risk of As; 47.34 (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅤAⅠ)M Reducing Cadmium with Lime Composite (apply lime of 3.75 ton/ha. Demonstrati Village 3. Cd in rice straw exceeds standard. Ⅴ per season in the first and second year; the application amount shall on Area 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is pretty high; be reduced by half in the third and forth year; the application shall pollution risk brought by variety or management be stopped in the fifth year); measures may exist in rice. 3. waterflooding irrigation; 61 Name of Name of Scale demonstrat Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village (ha.) ion area 4. Apply passivator according to Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for Reducing Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply passivator of 4.5 tons /ha. per season in the first and second year of project implementation; the application amount shall be reduced by half in the third and fourth year; the application shall be stopped in the fifth year); 5. Apply commercial organic fertilizer: the application amount is 1.5 tons/ha per season; 6. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 1. Popularize low accumulated rice variety; 2. Apply cadmium and arsenic synchronous passivator according to Hunan Integrated Management of Agricultural Land Pollution 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at high risk, and the As Project with World Bank Loan: Technical Specifications for pollution is at low risk; Reducing Cadmium by Using Soil Passivator (apply cadmium and 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at low risk, while there is RCⅤAⅡ SCⅡAⅠO arsenic synchronous passivator of 4.5 tons /ha. per season in the first no risk of As; 27.34 (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅤAⅠ)M and second year of project implementation; the application amount 3. Both Cd and As in rice straw exceed standard; Ⅰ shall be reduced by half in the third and fourth year; the application 4. Enrichment coefficient of rice variety is pretty high; shall be stopped in the fifth year); pollution risk brought by variety or management 3. Measures of removing straw away from fields; measures may exist in rice. 4. Management and control of contaminated rice; 5. Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land and management and control of Cd and As balance; Liaotang 27.37 RCⅠAⅠ SCⅠAⅠO 1. There is no risk of the Cd and As pollution; Strengthen monitoring on heavy metal pollution in agricultural land 62 Name of Name of Scale demonstrat Risk type Risk analysis Tackling measures village (ha.) ion area Village (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅠAⅠ)M 2. There is no risk of Cd and As in soil; and management and control of Cd and As balance; Ⅰ 1. Popularize low accumulated rice variety; 3. Litter water irrigation; 4、Apply passivator: apply passivator of 4.5 tons /ha. per season in 1. The Cd pollution in rice is at low risk, and there are the first and second year of project implementation; the application RCⅠAⅡ SCⅢAⅠO potential risk for As pollution; amount shall be reduced by half in the third and fourth year; the 39.96 (WⅠDⅠFⅠCCⅢAⅠ)M 2. The Cd pollution in soil is at low risk, while there is application shall be stopped in the fifth year); Ⅲ no risk of As; 5. Apply commercial organic fertilizer: the application amount is 1.5 3. As in rice straw exceed standard. tons/ha per season; 6. Measures of removing straw away from fields; 7. Management and control of contaminated rice. 63 Appendix 5 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Surface Water in Each Project County 1. Baojing County Table 5-1 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Surface Water Quality in Baojing Demonstration Area (Unit: mg/L; pH is dimensionless; ND represents not detected) Monitoring and evaluation factor Monitoring Monitoring water Name of point location Total Ammonia time pH CODcr As Pb Cd Cr (VI) Hg phosphorus nitrogen Maojiapo, Datuo Village, Fuxing Town 2017.8.22 7.69 6 0.04 ND ND ND ND ND ND (Water inlet of irrigation water source in demonstration area) Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) result Over standard Ganxi River / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times (Yanjing Xiazhai, Datuo Village, Fuxing Demonstration Area) Town 2017.8.22 7.79 8 0.06 ND ND ND ND ND ND (Irrigation drainage outlet in demonstration area) Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Xiaba River Xiaba Village, Purong Town 2017.8.22 7.81 6 0.02 ND ND ND ND ND ND 64 (Xiaba (Water inlet of irrigation water Demonstration Area) source in demonstration area) Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Xiaba Village, Purong Town (Irrigation drainage outlet in 2017.8.22 7.73 5 0.03 ND ND ND ND ND ND demonstration area) Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Group I, Bize Village, Purong Town (Water inlet of irrigation water 2017.8.22 7.71 6 0.02 ND ND ND ND ND ND source in demonstration area) Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) Bize River result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (Xiaba times Demonstration Area) Zaoku, Bize Village, Purong Town (Irrigation drainage outlet in 2017.8.22 7.97 5 0.03 ND ND ND ND ND ND demonstration area) Over standard rate Evaluation / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (%) result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 times Standards for Irrigation Water Quality in Agricultural Land 5.5～8.5 150 / / 0.05 0.2 0.01 0.1 0.001 GB5084-2005 Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water GB3838-2002 6～9 20 0.2 1.0 0.05 0.05 0.005 0.05 0.0001 Category III Continued Table 5-1 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Surface Water Quality in Baojing Demonstration Area (Unit: mg/L; pH is dimensionless; ND represents not detected) Monitoring and evaluation factor Monitoring Monitoring water Name of point location Total Ammonia time pH CODcr As Pb Cd Cr (VI) Hg phosphorus nitrogen Xiaba Group, Nadong Village, Qianling Town 2017.8.22 8.28 7 0.01 ND ND ND ND ND ND (Water inlet of irrigation water source in demonstration area) Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) Yanduiyan River result Over standard (Nadong / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Demonstration Area) Xiaba Group, Nadong Village, Qianling Town 2017.8.22 8.37 7 0.02 ND ND ND ND ND ND (Irrigation drainage outlet in demonstration area) Evaluation Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 result (%) 66 Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Shuitian Group, Shuitian Village, Shuitianhe Town 2017.8.22 8.45 8 0.01 ND ND ND ND ND ND (Water inlet of irrigation water source in demonstration area) Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) result Over standard Shuitian River / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times (Zhongba Maoping Group, Zhongba Village, Demonstration Area) Shuitianhe Town 2017.8.22 8.47 5 0.01 ND ND ND ND ND ND (Irrigation drainage outlet in demonstration area) Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Tizi Group, Hangsha Village, Lyudongshan Town (Water inlet of 2017.8.22 8.30 8 0.01 ND ND ND ND ND ND Lyudong River irrigation water source in (Hangsha demonstration area) Demonstration Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Area) Evaluation (%) result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times 67 Paiba Group, Hangsha Village, Lyudongshan Town 2017.8.22 8.31 6 0.02 ND ND ND ND ND ND (Irrigation drainage outlet in demonstration area) Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Standards for Irrigation Water Quality in Agricultural Land 5.5～8.5 150 / / 0.05 0.2 0.01 0.1 0.001 GB5084-2005 Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water GB3838-2002 6～9 20 0.2 1.0 0.05 0.05 0.005 0.05 0.0001 Category III 68 2. Jishou City Table 5-2 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Surface Water Quality in Jishou Demonstration Area (Unit: mg/L; pH is dimensionless; ND represents not detected) Monitoring and evaluation factor Monitorin Monitoring Name Total Ammonia g location time pH CODcr As Pb Cd Cr (VI) Hg phosphorus nitrogen Gaofeng Reservoir 2016.10.26 7.72 7 0.02 0.067 ND ND ND ND ND Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluatio rate (%) n result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Hangbajiao Reservoir 2016.10.26 7.62 17 0.01 0.026 ND ND ND ND ND Aizhai Over Town standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Demonstra Evaluatio rate (%) tion Area n result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Donghe River 2016.10.26 7.67 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Over Evaluatio standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n result (%) Over / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 standard times Mountain spring water 2016.10.26 7.57 6 0.01 0.065 ND ND ND ND ND Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluatio rate (%) n result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Standards for Irrigation Water Quality in Agricultural 5.5～8.5 150 / / 0.05 0.2 0.01 0.1 0.001 Land GB5084-2005 Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water 6～9 20 0.2 1.0 0.05 0.05 0.005 0.05 0.0001 GB3838-2002 Category III Continued Table 5-2 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Surface Water Quality in Jishou Demonstration Area (Unit: mg/L; pH is dimensionless; ND represents not detected) Monitoring and evaluation factor Monitoring Monitoring Name Total Ammonia location time pH CODcr As Pb Cd Cr (VI) Hg phosphorus nitrogen Mountain spring water 7.7 ND ND 0.054 ND ND ND ND ND Over standard Evalu / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Qianzhou rate (%) 2016.10.26 ation Sub-district Over standard result / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Office times Demonstration Mountain spring water 7.66 ND 0.03 ND ND ND ND ND ND Area Evalu Over standard 2016.10.26 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ation rate (%) result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 times Mountain spring water 7.57 18 0.01 ND ND ND ND ND ND Over standard Evalu 2016.10.26 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rate (%) ation Over standard result / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Longzhua Creek 7.64 8 ND 0.029 ND ND ND ND ND Over standard Evalu / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rate (%) 2016.10.26 ation Over standard result / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Mountain spring water 7.58 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Over standard Evalu / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rate (%) 2016.10.26 ation Over standard result / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Tributary of Tuojiang Shuangtang 7.69 ND ND 0.026 ND ND ND ND ND River Sub-district Over standard Office Evalu 2016.10.26 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rate (%) Demonstration ation Over standard Area result / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Mountain spring water 7.65 5 0.02 ND ND ND ND ND ND Over standard Evalu / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rate (%) 2016.10.26 ation Over standard result / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Standards for Irrigation Water Quality in Agricultural 5.5～8.5 150 / / 0.05 0.2 0.01 0.1 0.001 Land GB5084-2005 Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water 6～9 20 0.2 1.0 0.05 0.05 0.005 0.05 0.0001 GB3838-2002 Category III 71 3. Yongshun County Table 5-3 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Surface Water Quality in Wanping Demonstration Area in Yongshun County (Unit: mg/L; pH is dimensionless; ND represents not detected) Monitoring and evaluation factor Monitoring Total Name Monitoring point location Ammonia time pH CODcr phosph As Pb Cd Cr (VI) Hg nitrogen orus 2017.3.7 7.64 ND 0.01 0.066 ND ND ND ND ND Irrigation Canal of Longzhai 2017.3.8 7.87 17 0.13 0.327 ND ND ND ND ND Village 2017.3.9 7.79 19 0.17 0.494 ND ND ND ND ND Evaluati Over standard rate (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 on Maximum over result 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 standard times 2017.3.7 7.39 6 ND 0.189 ND ND 0.0006 ND ND Irrigation Canal of Xinglong 2017.3.8 7.57 ND 0.02 0.080 ND ND 0.0007 ND ND Wanping Neighborhood Committee Demonstration 2017.3.9 7.62 ND ND 0.087 ND ND 0.0005 ND ND Area Evaluati Over standard rate (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 on Maximum over result 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 standard times 2017.3.7 7.53 ND 0.01 0.133 ND ND 0.0002 ND ND Irrigation Canal of Shangping 2017.3.8 7.75 ND 0.01 0.028 ND ND ND ND ND Village 2017.3.9 7.61 ND 0.02 0.044 ND ND ND ND ND Evaluati Over standard rate (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 on result Maximum over 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 standard times 2017.3.7 7.83 ND ND 0.095 ND ND ND ND ND Irrigation Canal of Beiliping 2017.3.8 7.89 ND 0.03 0.111 ND ND ND ND ND Village 2017.3.9 7.89 ND 0.01 0.063 ND ND ND ND ND Evaluati Over standard rate (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 on Maximum over result 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 standard times Standards for Irrigation Water Quality in Agricultural Land GB5084-2005 5.5～8.5 150 / / 0.05 0.2 0.01 0.1 0.001 Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water GB3838-2002 6～9 20 0.2 1.0 0.05 0.05 0.005 0.05 0.0001 Category III 73 4. Huayuan County Table 5-4 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Surface Water Quality in Each Demonstration Area in Huayuan County (Unit: mg/L; pH is dimensionless) Monitoring and evaluation factor Name Monitoring time Monitoring point location Total Ammonia pH COD phosphoru As Pb Cd Cr (VI) Hg nitrogen s Upstream Section of Ganggang 7.45 5L 0.085 0.01L 0.0005L 0.0025L 0.0002L 3×10-5 0.004L Village of Wu Canal Evaluation Over standard rate 2016.9.27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 result (%) Maximum over Huayuan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 standard times Demonstra Upstream Section of tion Area 7.32 5L 0.082 0.01 0.0005L 0.0025L 0.0002L 2×10-5 0.004L Laotianping of unknown creek Over standard rate 2016.9.27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) result Maximum over 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 standard times Upstream Section of Longmen Village of tributary of Longtan 7.50 5L 0.109 0.01L 0.0005L 0.0025L 0.0002L 3×10-5 0.004L River Over standard rate 2016.9.27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (%) Evaluation Longtan result Maximum over Demonstra 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 standard times tion Area Upstream Section of Jinrong Village of tributary of Longtan 7.45 5L 0.09 0.01L 0.0005L 0.0025L 0.0002L 3×10-5 0.004L 2016.9.27 River Evaluation Over standard rate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 result (%) 74 Maximum over 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 standard times Upstream Section of Geyu 7.83 7 0.139 0.01L 0.0005L 0.0025L 0.0003 2×10-5 0.004L Village of Jiaoyu River Over standard rate 2016.9.27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) result Maximum over Malichang 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 standard times Demonstra Upstream Section of Wanggao tion Area 7.50 5L 0.107 0.02 0.0005L 0.0025L 0.0002L 2×10-5 0.004L Village of Jiaoyu River Over standard rate 2016.9.27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) result Maximum over 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 standard times Section of Xinzhai Village of 7.42 5L 0.085 0.01L 0.0005L 0.0025L 0.0002L 2×10-5 0.004L unknown creek Over standard rate 2016.9.27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) result Maximum over Mao’er 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 standard times Demonstra Upstream Section Mao’er tion Area 7.38 5L 0.069 0.01L 0.0005L 0.0025L 0.0002L 4×10-5 0.004L Village of unknown creek Over standard rate 2016.9.27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) result Maximum over 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 standard times Standards for Irrigation Water Quality in Agricultural Land 5.5～8.5 150 / / 0.01 0.2 0.05 0.001 0.1 GB5084-2005 Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water 6～9 20 1.0 0.2 0.005 0.05 0.05 0.0001 0.05 GB3838-2002 Category III L indicates that it is not detected and its value is the detected limit. 75 5. Cili County Table 5-5 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Surface Water Quality in Cili County Demonstration Area (Unit: mg/L; pH is dimensionless; ND represents not detected) Monitoring and evaluation factor Monitoring Total Ammoni Name Monitoring point location time pH CODcr phosph a As Pb Cd Cr (VI) Hg orus nitrogen Irrigation Canal 1 of Dongyueguan Town 2017.7.17 7.59 5 ND 0.092 0.0007 ND ND ND ND Demonstration Area (located at Dongyuan) Dongyueguan Irrigation Canal 2 of Town Dongyueguan Town 2017.7.17 7.57 18 0.03 0.175 0.0012 ND ND ND ND Demonstration Demonstration Area (located at Area Tuxi) 2017.7.17 Zhuangta Reservoir 8.33 13 0.02 0.220 ND ND ND ND ND Evaluat Over standard rate (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ion Maximum over 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 result standard times Irrigation Canal 1 of Yangliupu 2017.7.17 Township Demonstration Area 7.93 12 0.01 0.076 0.0004 ND ND ND ND (located at Yangyu) Irrigation Canal 2 of Yangliupu Yangliupu 2017.7.17 Township Demonstration Area 7.73 5 0.01 0.129 0.0009 ND ND ND ND Township (located at Zidong) Demonstration Irrigation Canal 3 of Yangliupu Area 2017.7.17 Township Demonstration Area 7.88 7 0.02 0.092 0.0009 ND ND ND ND (located at Gangping) 2017.7.17 Guantianrong Reservoir 8.08 12 ND 0.258 0.0007 ND ND ND ND Evaluat Over standard rate (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 ion Maximum over 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 result standard times Irrigation Canal 1 of Tongjinpu 2017.7.17 Town Demonstration Area 6.95 11 0.02 0.268 0.0005 ND ND ND ND (located at Xinwu) Irrigation Canal 2 of Tongjinpu 2017.7.17 Town Demonstration Area 7.74 6 0.03 0.167 0.0012 ND ND ND ND Tongjinpu Town (located at Zhangtai) Demonstration Irrigation Canal 1 of Tongjinpu Area 2017.7.17 Town Demonstration Area 7.40 10 ND 0.111 0.0004 ND ND ND ND (located at Litai) 2017.7.17 Zhuangta Reservoir 8.33 13 0.02 0.220 ND ND ND ND ND Evaluat Over standard rate (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ion Maximum over 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 result standard times Irrigation Canal of Gaoqiao Town 2017.7.17 7.81 14 ND 0.089 0.0005 ND ND ND ND Demonstration Area Gaoqiao Town 2017.7.17 Dongfeng Reservoir 8.12 8 0.02 0.071 0.0006 ND ND ND ND Demonstration Evaluat Over standard rate (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Area ion Maximum over 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 result standard times 2017.7.17 Pingxi River 7.25 9 0.01 0.089 0.0004 ND ND ND ND Irrigation Canal of Sanhekou Sanhekou Town 2017.7.17 7.71 7 0.02 0.071 0.0006 ND ND ND ND Town Demonstration Area Demonstration Evaluat Over standard rate (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Area ion Maximum over 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 result standard times Standards for Irrigation Water Quality in Agricultural Land 5.5～8.5 150 / / 0.05 0.2 0.01 0.1 0.001 GB5084-2005 Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water GB3838-2002 6～9 20 0.2 1.0 0.05 0.05 0.005 0.05 0.0001 Category III 77 6. Zhongfang County Table 5-6 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Surface Water Quality in Zhongfang County Demonstration Area (Unit: mg/L; pH is dimensionless; ND represents not detected) Monitoring and evaluation factor Monitoring Total Ammoni Name Monitoring point location time pH CODcr phosph a As Pb Cd Cr (VI) Hg orus nitrogen 2016.12.9 Sanliping Lake Reservoir 7.20 ND 0.02 0.031 ND ND ND ND 0.00005 2016.12.9 Fujiao Creek Reservoir 7.38 11 0.07 0.237 ND ND ND ND 0.00004 Irrigation water 2016.12.9 Huzhu Reservoir 7.37 18 0.12 0.851 ND ND ND ND 0.00003 source in Luyang Town 2016.12.9 Shiziyan Reservoir 7.16 ND 0.02 0.075 ND ND ND ND 0.00004 Demonstration 2016.12.9 Baotu Reservoir 6.86 8 0.03 0.260 ND ND ND ND 0.00003 Area Evaluat Over standard rate (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ion Maximum over result 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 standard times Irrigation water 2016.12.9 Tuanjie Reservoir 7.85 ND 0.02 0.031 ND ND ND ND 0.00003 source in Xinjian Town Evaluat Over standard rate (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Demonstration ion Maximum over Area result 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 standard times Irrigation water 2016.12.9 Zhuyuantou Reservoir 7.78 9 0.01 0.474 ND ND ND ND 0.00004 source in Tongwan Town Evaluat Over standard rate (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Demonstration ion Maximum over Area result 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 standard times 78 Irrigation water 2016.12.9 Shengli Reservoir 7.31 18 0.11 0.138 ND ND ND ND 0.00003 source in Tongmu Town Evaluat Over standard rate (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Demonstration ion Maximum over Area result 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 standard times Standards for Irrigation Water Quality in Agricultural Land 5.5～8.5 150 / / 0.05 0.2 0.01 0.1 0.001 GB5084-2005 Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water GB3838-2002 6～9 20 0.2 1.0 0.05 0.05 0.005 0.05 0.0001 Category III 79 7. Anhua County Table 5-7 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Surface Water Quality in Anhua County Demonstration Area (Unit: mg/L; pH is dimensionless; ND represents not detected) Monitoring and evaluation factor Monitoring Monitoring Total Name Ammonia location time pH CODcr phosphor As Pb Cd Cr (VI) Hg nitrogen us 2017.5 6.9 ND 0.02 0.05 0.011 ND ND ND ND Kuixi Village 2017.5 7.14 ND ND 0.05 ND ND 0.0007 ND ND Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Kuixi Town times Muliu Village 2017.5 7.26 ND ND 0.04 0.001 ND ND ND ND Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Zhongdi Village 2017.5 6.92 ND 0.05 0.05 0.001 ND ND ND ND Over standard rate Evaluation / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (%) Dongping result Over standard times / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Town Zhongdi Village 2017.5 6.81 ND 0.09 ND ND ND ND ND ND Evaluation Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 result (%) 80 Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Hezhen Village 2017.5 6.95 27 1.04 5.55 0.002 ND 0.0006 ND ND Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Changtang times Town Hezhen Village 2017.5 7.02 26 1.12 8.35 0.002 ND ND ND ND Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Yushui Village 2017.5 7.64 ND 0.08 0.09 ND ND ND ND ND Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Qingtangpu times Town Yushui Village 2017.5 7.76 22 0.12 0.07 ND ND ND ND ND Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Bianjiang Village 2017.5 6.65 9 0.05 0.35 0.002 ND ND ND ND Jiangnan Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Town Evaluation (%) result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Standards for Irrigation Water Quality in Agricultural Land 5.5～8.5 150 / / 0.05 0.2 0.01 0.1 0.001 GB5084-2005 81 8. Hengnan County Table 5-8 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Surface Water Quality in Hengnan County Demonstration Area (Unit: mg/L; pH is dimensionless; ND represents not detected) Monitoring and evaluation factor Monitoring Monitoring Total Name Ammonia location time pH CODcr phosphoru As Pb Cd Cr (VI) Hg nitrogen s Qishan Mountain spring water 2016.12.13 7.29 19 0.02 0.047 ND ND ND ND ND Over standard Office 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rate (%) Demonstrati Evaluation result Over standard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 on Area times Water quality of Quanhu Shuangbanqiao 2017.10.17 7.58 28 0.12 0.357 0.0012 0.0024 0.0003 ND 0.0001 Reservoir Town Over standard Demonstrati 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rate (%) Evaluation result on Area Over standard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Water quality of Lijiang 2016.12.13 6.98 19 0.23 1.61 0.002 ND ND ND ND Shangfeng Reservoir Town Over standard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Demonstrati rate (%) Evaluation result Over standard on Area 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Water quality of Xiangyang Ouyanghai Irrigated 2017.10.17 7.08 17 0.08 0.130 0.0008 0.0029 0.0004 ND 0.0001 Town Area Reservoir Demonstrati Over standard Evaluation result 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rate (%) 82 on Area Over standard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Water quality of Xiantang 2016.12.13 6.92 17 0.06 0.37 ND ND ND ND ND Lutang Reservoir Town Over standard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Demonstrati rate (%) Evaluation result Over standard on Area 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Water quality of Huaqiao Longxiqiao 2017.10.17 7.95 12 0.06 0.031 0.0045 0.001 0.0001 ND 0.00004 Reservoir Town Over standard Demonstrati 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rate (%) Evaluation result on Area Over standard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Water quality of Songmutang 2017.10.17 7.64 7 0.09 ND 0.0345 0.0056 0.0009 ND ND Chashi Reservoir Demonstrati Over standard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 on Area rate (%) Evaluation result Over standard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Water quality of hilly Jiangkou 2017.10.17 6.99 121 1.48 2.51 0.0202 0.0157 0.004 ND 0.00005 pond water Town Over standard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Demonstrati rate (%) Evaluation result Over standard on Area 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Standards for Irrigation Water Quality in Agricultural Land 5.5～8.5 150 / / 0.05 0.2 0.01 0.1 0.001 GB5084-2005 Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water GB3838-2002 6～9 20 0.2 1.0 0.05 0.05 0.005 0.05 0.0001 Category III 83 9. Yizhang County Table 5-9 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Surface Water Quality in Each Demonstration Area of Yizhang County (Unit: mg/L; pH is dimensionless; ND represents not detected) Monitoring and evaluation factor Total Monitoring pH value Ammonia Pb Name Monitoring point location CODcr phospho Cd Hg Cr (VI) time (dimensionle nitrogen (mg/ As (mg/L) (mg/L) rus(mg/ (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) ss) (mg/L) L) L) 2016.10.26 Wushui River 7.42 13 0.322 0.03 ND ND 0.00008 0.0022 ND Meitian Town Over standard rate Demonstration Evaluati 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (%) Area on Maximum over result 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 standard times 2016.10.26 Zhangshui 7.09 36 0.409 0.07 ND ND ND 0.0111 ND Wuling Town Over standard rate Demonstration Evaluati 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (%) Area on Maximum over result 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 standard times 2016.10.26 Changleshui 7.25 12 0.986 0.60 ND ND 0.00006 0.003 ND Yiliu Town Over standard rate Demonstration Evaluati 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (%) Area on Maximum over result 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 standard times Standards for Irrigation Water Quality in Agricultural Land 5.5～8.5 150 / / 0.01 0.2 0.001 0.05 0.1 GB5084-2005 Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water GB3838-2002 6～9 20 1.0 0.2 0.005 0.05 0.0001 0.05 0.05 Category III 84 10. Linwu County Table 5-10 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Surface Water Quality in Linwu County Demonstration Area (Unit: mg/L; pH is dimensionless; ND represents not detected) Monitoring and evaluation factor Monitoring Total Name of point location Ammonia location pH CODcr phosph As Pb Cd Cr (VI) Hg nitrogen orus Water Inlet Channel of Linwandong Bridge 7.5 7 0.21 0.571 3.2×10-3 ND ND ND ND Over standard Evaluation result 0 0 0.05 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Wushui Town Xiejiang Bridge 8.96 5 0.09 0.125 0.152 ND ND ND ND Over standard Evaluation result 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Xiangtangdong, Wenxi 7.98 8 0.12 0.499 0.0164 ND ND ND ND Over standard Evaluation result 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Wenxi Bridge 8.06 5 0.06 0.168 1.5×10-3 ND ND ND ND Nanqiang Town Over standard Evaluation result 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Water source at Liantangjing 7.33 6 0.01 0.09 ND ND ND ND ND Over standard Evaluation result 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Standards for Irrigation Water Quality in Agricultural Land 5.5～8.5 150 / / 0.05 0.2 0.01 0.1 0.001 GB5084-2005 85 Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water GB3838-2002 6～9 20 0.2 1.0 0.05 0.05 0.005 0.05 0.0001 Category III 86 11. Lengshuitan District Table 5-11 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Surface Water Quality in Lengshuitan Demonstration Area (Unit: mg/L; pH is dimensionless; ND represents not detected) Monitoring and evaluation factor Monitorin Monitoring Total Name of point location Ammonia g location time pH CODcr phosphor As Pb Cd Cr (VI) Hg nitrogen us Dengjiachong Reservoir 2017.3 7.48 7.6 0.02 ND 0.00158 0.00049 0.00006 0.0004 ND Over Xianghuab standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Village Evaluatio rate (%) Demonstra n result Over tion Area standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Lanjiang River 2017.3 7.41 12.1 0.03 0.191 0.004 0.00001 0.00005 0.0004 ND Over Shixijiang standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Village Evaluatio rate (%) Demonstra n result Over tion Area standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Lishan Muzitang Reservoir 2017.3 7.15 10.5 0.02 0.036 0.00479 0.00018 0.00001 0.0004 0.00007 Village Over Evaluatio Demonstra standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n result tion Area, (%) 87 Qishan Over Demonstra standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tion Area times Shankou Reservoir 2017.3 7.3 12.6 0.02 0.035 0.00525 0.00003 0.0001 0.0004 0.00001 Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluatio rate (%) n result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Standards for Irrigation Water Quality in Agricultural 5.5～8.5 150 / / 0.05 0.2 0.01 0.1 0.001 Land GB5084-2005 Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water 6～9 20 0.2 1.0 0.05 0.05 0.005 0.05 0.0001 GB3838-2002 Category III 88 12. Qiyang County Table 5-12 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Surface Water Quality in Qiyang Demonstration Area (Unit: mg/L; pH is dimensionless; ND represents not detected) Monitoring and evaluation factor Monitorin Monitoring water Name of point location Ammonia Total g time pH CODcr Cd Pb As Hg Cr (VI) nitrogen phosphorus Liaotang Village, Baishui Town (Inlet of irrigation water in 2017.7.19 7.22 5 0.117 0.09 ND ND 0.0017 ND ND demonstration area) Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) Baishui River result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (Baishui times Demonstration Xinzhong Village, Baishui Town Area) (Inlet of irrigation water in 2017.7.19 7.28 11 0.040 0.09 ND ND 0.0018 ND ND demonstration area) Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Dajiangbian Wangjiaping Village, Xiaojia Town Reservoir and (Downstream of Dajiangbian 0.000 Irrigation Canal Reservoir and water inlet of 2017.7.19 7.67 6 0.216 0.06 ND ND 0.0007 ND 04 (Xiaojia irrigation water source in Demonstration demonstration area) 89 Area) Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Jinxing Village, Xiaojia Town (Downstream of Dajiangbian Reservoir and water inlet of 2017.7.19 7.42 8 0.222 0.11 ND ND 0.0008 ND ND irrigation water source in demonstration area) Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Irrigation inlet of Niuling Village 2017.7.19 7.32 10 0.345 0.03 ND ND 0.0006 ND ND Area, Xiaojia Town Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) result Over standard / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 times Irrigation inlet of Niutouwan 2017.7.19 7.07 18 1.09 0.24 ND ND 0.0024 ND ND Village Area, Xiaojia Town Over standard rate / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Evaluation (%) result Over standard / 0 0 0.09 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 times Standards for Irrigation Water Quality in Agricultural Land 5.5～8.5 150 / / 0.01 0.2 0.05 0.001 0.1 90 GB5084-2005 Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water GB3838-2002 0.000 6～9 20 1.0 0.2 0.005 0.05 0.05 0.05 Category III 1 91 Appendix 6 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Sediment of Irrigation Canal of Demonstrat ion Areas in each Project County 1. Sediment of Irrigation Canal of Baojing County Table 6-1 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Sediment of Irrigation Canal of Baojing Demonstration Area Name of Monitoring factor demonstration Specific point location pH area Total Cr (mg/kg) Cd (mg/kg) Pb (mg/kg) Hg (mg/kg) As (mg/kg) (dimensionless) Monitoring value 75.8 0.27 35.2 0.123 5.98 6.8 Ganxi Village Over standard times 0 0 0 0 0 / Monitoring value 80.7 0.23 42.4 0.103 7.52 6.7 Yanjing Village Yanjing Over standard times 0 0 0 0 0 / Demonstration Area Monitoring value 67.2 0.29 38.4 0.136 9.52 6.7 Datuo Village Over standard times 0 0 0 0 0 / Monitoring value 98.4 0.51 57.9 0.219 4.56 6.4 Mawang Village Over standard times 0 0.7 0 0 0 / Monitoring value 55 .9 0.33 30.7 0.149 11.4 7.1 Zebi Village Xiaba Over standard times 0 0.1 0 0 0 / Demonstration Area Monitoring value 63.4 0.48 44.8 0.142 12.8 6.9 Xiaba Village Over standard times 0 0.6 0 0 0 / Monitoring value 64.8 0.31 31.4 0.168 11.4 6.5 Nadong Heping Village Demonstration Over standard times 0 0.03 0 0 0 / Area Nadong Monitoring value 97.2 0.61 45.6 0.254 17.2 6.6 92 Village Over standard times 0 1.03 0 0 0 / Monitoring value 77.1 0.48 54.2 0.185 13.6 7.3 Zhongba Village Zhongba Over standard times 0 0.6 0 0 0 / Demonstration Area Monitoring value 68.4 0.52 47.8 0.235 9.21 7.2 Shuitian Village Over standard times 0 0.73 0 0 0 / Monitoring value 59.3 0.27 27.1 0.118 8.25 7.1 Hangsha Village Hangsha Over standard times 0 0 0 0 0 / Demonstration Area Monitoring value 48.2 0.25 29.8 0.098 7.38 7.4 Hangji Village Over standard times 0 0 0 0 0 / ≤250 ≤0.3 ≤250 ≤0.3 ≤30 pH＜6.5 Environmental Quality Standard for Soils ≤300 ≤0.3 ≤300 ≤0.5 ≤25 6.5≤pH≤ 7.5 (GB15618-1995) Level-II standard ≤350 ≤0.6 ≤350 ≤1.0 ≤20 pH＞7.5 Note: Provided by Water Conservancy Bureau of Baojing County and it was inspected in 2015. 93 2. Sediment of Irrigation Canal of Jishou City Table 6-2 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Sediment of Irrigation Canal of Jishou Demonstration Area Monitoring factor Name of Specific address of sample pH demonstration Pb Cd (village/group) As (mg/kg) Cr (mg/kg) Hg (mg/kg) (dimensionless area (mg/kg) (mg/kg) ) Group 3 of Yangmeng 32.2 0.25 8.47 44.5 0.1 5.09 Gaofeng Village Reservoir Over standard Aizhai Town 0 0 0 0 0 / times Demonstration Area Group 3 of Paixiong 35.6 0.5 6.19 42.2 0.11 5.4 Hangbajiao Village Reservoir Over standard 0 0.66 0 0 0 / times Group 6 of 33.3 0.37 11.7 63.6 0.082 6.85 Jilue Longwu Qianzhou Over standard Sub-district 0 0.23 0 0 0 / times Office Shanquan Demonstration Group 3 of 42.3 0.46 11 65.8 0.15 6.53 Area Jilue Jielian Over standard 0 0.53 0 0 0 / times ≤250 ≤0.3 ≤30 ≤250 ≤0.3 pH＜6.5 Environmental Quality Standard for Soils ≤300 ≤0.3 ≤25 ≤300 ≤0.5 6.5≤pH≤ 7.5 (GB15618-1995) Level-II standard ≤350 ≤0.6 ≤20 ≤350 ≤1.0 pH＞7.5 94 3. Sediment of Irrigation Canal of Yongshun County Table 6-3 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Sediment of Irrigation Canal of Yongshun County Demonstration Area Name of Monitoring factor (Unit: mg/kg; pH is dimensionless) demonstration Specific point location area 总 Cr Cd Pb Hg As pH Monitoring value 26.2 0.32 17.4 0.024 4.23 8.79 Longzhai Level-II Over 0 0 0 0 0 / Village standard standard Level-III times 0 0 0 0 0 / standard Monitoring value 31.8 1.45 22.0 0.099 13.5 7.34 Xinglong Level-II Neighborhood Over 0 3.8 0 0 0 / standard Committee standard Level-III Wanping times 0 0.45 0 0 0 / standard Demonstration Area Monitoring value 20.1 0.82 13.2 0.063 4.62 7.35 Shangping Level-II Over 0 1.7 0 0 0 / Village standard standard Level-III times 0 0 0 0 0 / standard Monitoring value 81.1 1.40 27.1 0.185 16.6 7.72 Beiliping Level-II Over 0 1.3 0 0 0 / Village standard standard Level-III times 0 0.4 0 0 0 / standard ≤250 ≤0.3 ≤250 ≤0.3 ≤30 pH＜6.5 时 Environmental Quality Level-II standard ≤300 ≤0.3 ≤300 ≤0.5 ≤25 6.5≤pH≤ 7.5 时 Standard for Soils (GB15618-1995) ≤350 ≤0.6 ≤350 ≤1.0 ≤20 pH＞7.5 时 Level-III standard ≤400 ≤1.0 ≤350 ≤1.5 ≤30 pH＞6.5 时 95 4. Sediment of Irrigation Canal of Huayuan County Table 6-4 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Sediment of Irrigation Canal of Huayuan County Demonstration Area Name of Monitoring factor demonstration Specific point location pH(dimensionle area Total Cr(mg/kg) Cd(mg/kg) Pb(mg/kg) Hg(mg/kg) As(mg/kg) ss) Monitoring value 53.8 0.62 317 1.2 23.2 7.47 Ganggang Village Huayuan Town Over standard times 0 1.07 0 1.4 0 / Demonstration Area Monitoring value 52.4 0.090 81.1 0.28 30.0 5.84 Laotianping Village Over standard times 0 0 0 0 0 / Monitoring value 64.2 0.68 458 0.86 34.6 6.27 Longmen Village Longtan Town Over standard times 0 1.27 0.83 1.87 0.15 / Demonstration Area Monitoring value 57.4 0.68 196 0.56 24.9 6.16 Jinrong Village Over standard times 0 1.27 0 0.87 0 / Monitoring value 39.0 0.11 41.5 0.17 19.2 6.12 Geyu Village Malichang Over standard times 0 0 0 0 0 / Town Demonstration Monitoring value 51.1 0.15 60.4 0.57 28.9 6.20 Area Wanggao Village Over standard times 0 0 0 0.9 0 / Monitoring value 45.9 0.74 489 0.51 32.8 6.21 Xinzhai Mao’er Village Over standard times 0 1.47 0.96 0.7 0.09 / Township Demonstration Area Monitoring value 49.1 0.74 474 1.2 26.9 6.00 Mao’er Village Over standard times 0 1.47 0.9 3.0 0 / 96 Name of Monitoring factor demonstration Specific point location pH(dimensionle area Total Cr(mg/kg) Cd(mg/kg) Pb(mg/kg) Hg(mg/kg) As(mg/kg) ss) ≤250 ≤0.3 ≤250 ≤0.3 ≤30 pH＜6.5 Environmental Quality Standard for Soils ≤300 ≤0.3 ≤300 ≤0.5 ≤25 6.5≤pH≤ 7.5 (GB15618-1995) Level-II standard ≤350 ≤0.6 ≤350 ≤1.0 ≤20 pH＞7.5 97 5. Sediment of Irrigation Canal of Cili County Table 6-5 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Sediment of Irrigation Canal of Cili County Demonstration Area Name of Monitoring factor(Unit: mg/kg; pH is dimensionless) demonstration Specific point location area Total Cr Cd Pb Hg As pH Monitoring value 42.1 0.32 23.7 0.029 4.47 7.9 Dongyuan Irrigation Over Level-II standard 0 0 0 0 0 / Canal standard Dongyueguan times Level-III standard 0 0 0 0 0 / Town Demonstration Monitoring value 42.6 0.16 22.4 0.028 3.54 7.85 Area Xibianyu Irrigation Over Level-II standard 0 0 0 0 0 / Canal standard times Level-III standard 0 0 0 0 0 / Monitoring value 50.5 0.49 27.1 0.077 5.74 7.92 Yangliupu Township Huayue Over Level-II standard 0 0 0 0 0 / Demonstration Village standard Area times Level-III standard 0 0 0 0 0 / Monitoring value 50.2 1.19 21.7 0.054 5.21 7.84 Litai Irrigation Canal, Over Level-II standard 0 1.0 0 0 0 / Pingshan standard Village times Level-III standard 0 0.2 0 0 0 / Tongjinpu Zhangtai Monitoring value 51.7 0.69 25.5 0.055 8.13 8.04 Town Irrigation Demonstration Canal, Over Level-II standard 0 0.2 0 0 0 / Area Pingshan standard Village times Level-III standard 0 0 0 0 0 / Xinwu Monitoring value 49.9 0.38 24.6 0.065 7.97 7.64 Irrigation Canal, Over Level-II standard 0 0 0 0 0 / 98 Pingshan standard Level-III standard 0 0 0 0 0 / Village times Monitoring value 43.8 1.19 26.4 0.12 8.80 7.62 Xianfeng Over Level-II standard 0 1.0 0 0 0 / Village standard Gaoqiao Town times Level-III standard 0 0.2 0 0 0 / Demonstration Area Monitoring value 52.8 0.32 23.4 0.23 6.52 7.82 Dongfeng Over Level-II standard 0 0 0 0 0 / Reservoir standard times Level-III standard 0 0 0 0 0 / Monitoring value 62.2 0.47 29.0 0.11 9.57 7.24 Leiyan Village Over Level-II standard 0 0.6 0 0 0 / standard Sanhekou Town times Level-III standard 0 0 0 0 0 / Demonstration Area Monitoring value 55.1 0.27 30.3 0.063 4.86 6.93 Guotai Neighborhood Over Level-II standard 0 0 0 0 0 / Committee standard times Level-III standard 0 0 0 0 0 / ≤250 ≤0.3 ≤250 ≤0.3 ≤30 pH＜6.5 时 Environmental Quality Level-II standard ≤300 ≤0.3 ≤300 ≤0.5 ≤25 6.5≤pH≤ 7.5 时 Standard for Soils (GB15618-1995) ≤350 ≤0.6 ≤350 ≤1.0 ≤20 pH＞7.5 时 Level-III standard ≤400 ≤1.0 ≤350 ≤1.5 ≤30 pH＞6.5 时 99 6. Sediment of Irrigation Canal of Zhongfang County Table 6-6 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Sediment of Irrigation Canal of Zhongfang County Demonstration Area Name of Monitoring factor (Unit: mg/kg; pH is dimensionless) demonstration Specific point location area Total Cr Cd Pb Hg As pH Monitoring value 42.8 0.39 30.9 0.16 5.83 8.17 Sanlipinghu Reservoir, Over Level-II standard 0 0 0 0 0 / Wuli Village standard times Level-III standard 0 0 0 0 0 / Monitoring value 29.9 0.18 21.8 0.041 5.30 7.84 Fujiaoxi Reservoir, Over Level-II standard 0 0 0 0 0 / Qiaoshang standard Village Luyang Town times Level-III standard 0 0 0 0 0 / Demonstration Area Monitoring value 23.4 0.25 20.7 0.065 2.76 6.57 Huzhu Over Level-II standard 0 0 0 0 0 / Reservoir standard times Level-III standard 0 0 0 0 0 / Monitoring value 72.4 0.3 29.9 0.21 14.5 6.80 Shiziyan Over Level-II standard 0 0 0 0 0 / Reservoir standard times Level-III standard 0 0 0 0 0 / Monitoring value 51.4 0.35 24.6 0.12 19.2 7.67 Zhuyuantou Tongwan Town Reservoir, Demonstration Over Level-II standard 0 0 0 0 0 / Zhuyuantou Area standard Village times Level-III standard 0 0 0 0 0 / Xinjian Town Tuanjie Monitoring value 89.1 0.3 47.1 0.28 18.8 6.64 Demonstration Reservoir, Area Huangjin Over Level-II standard 0 0 0 0 0 / 100 Village standard Level-III standard 0 0 0 0 0 / times Monitoring value 47.7 0.65 29.2 0.13 8.26 7.74 Tongmu Town Shengli Demonstration Reservoir, Over Level-II standard 0 0.1 0 0 0 / Area Fengpo Village standard times Level-III standard 0 0 0 0 0 / ≤250 ≤0.3 ≤250 ≤0.3 ≤30 pH＜6.5 时 Environmental Quality Level-II standard ≤300 ≤0.3 ≤300 ≤0.5 ≤25 6.5≤pH≤ 7.5 时 Standard for Soils (GB15618-1995) ≤350 ≤0.6 ≤350 ≤1.0 ≤20 pH＞7.5 时 Level-III standard ≤400 ≤1.0 ≤350 ≤1.5 ≤30 pH＞6.5 时 101 7. Anhua County Table 6-7 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Sediment of Irrigation Canal of Anhua County Demonstration Area Monitoring factor Name of Specific address of sample demonstration area (village/group) Pb Cd pH(dimensionless As (mg/kg) Cr (mg/kg) Hg (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) ) Kuixi 34.1 1.79 38.71 50.6 0.189 5.80 Over standard times 0 4.96 0.29 0 0 / Kuixi Village Kuixi 35.5 2.74 50.29 57.0 0.194 5.90 Kuixi Town Over standard times 0 8.13 0.67 0 0 / Rangxi 50.1 2.09 13 60.8 0.11 7.26 Muliu Village Over standard times 0 5.96 0 0 0 / Zhongdi Irrigation Canal 47.4 5.14 9.1 59.2 0.1 6.28 Dongping Town Village Over standard times 0 16.13 0 0 0 / Irrigation Canal 36.3 0.87 13.9 64.5 0.14 7.81 Qingtangpu Town Yushui Village Over standard times 0 0.45 0 0 0 / ≤250 ≤0.3 ≤30 ≤250 ≤0.3 pH＜6.5 Environmental Quality Standard for Soils ≤300 ≤0.3 ≤25 ≤300 ≤0.5 6.5≤pH≤ 7.5 (GB15618-1995)Level-II standard ≤350 ≤0.6 ≤20 ≤350 ≤1.0 pH＞7.5 102 8. Hengnan County Table 6-8 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Sediment of Irrigation Canal of Hennan County Demonstration Area Monitoring factor Name of sampling place Pb Available Cd pH Cr (mg/kg) Cd (mg/kg) Hg (mg/kg) As (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (dimensionless) Xiamian Field, Dawan Hilly Field, Songjia Group 51.2 0.56 47.9 0.13 17.5 0.25 6.21 Over standard times 0 0.9 0 0 0 / / Laoyang Hilly Field, Dawu Group, Qitang Village 58.1 1.2 39.0 0.19 13.2 0.82 5.07 Over standard times 0 3 0 0 0 / / First Lotus Field, Xinglong Group, Jiepai Village 36.9 0.56 55.6 0.19 7.0 0.38 5.49 Over standard times 0 0.9 0 0 0 / / Jingqiu, Jingtou Group, Zhushan Village 42.3 0.56 43.0 0.10 6.94 0.81 5.80 Over standard times 0 0.9 0 0 0 / / Environmental Quality Standard for Soils (GB15618-1995) Level-II ≤250 ≤0.3 ≤250 ≤0.3 ≤30 / pH＜6.5 standard ≤300 ≤0.3 ≤300 ≤0.5 ≤25 / 6.5≤pH≤ 7.5 103 9. Yizhang County Table 6-9 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Sediment of Irrigation Canal of Yizhang County Demonstration Area Monitoring factor pH Organic Cation exchange Name of sampling place Pb As Available Cd Cr (mg/kg) Cd (mg/kg) Hg (mg/kg) (dimensionl matter capacity (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) ess) (g/kg) (cmol/kg(+)) Sediment of Wushui River 53.0 0.81 55.2 0.181 18.55 0.40 7.19 45.7 14.8 Over standard times 0 1.7 0 0 0 / / / / Sediment of Zhangshui 37.8 0.50 111.2 0.187 19.27 0.28 7.49 26.3 8.7 Over standard times 0 0.67 0 0 0 / / / / Sediment of Changle River 83.1 1.42 74.8 0.24 28.82 0.34 7.20 64.6 10.1 Over standard times 0 3.7 0 0 0 / / / / ≤250 ≤0.3 ≤250 ≤0.3 ≤30 / pH＜6.5 / / Environmental Quality Standard for Soils (GB15618-1995) Level-II standard 6.5≤pH≤ ≤300 ≤0.3 ≤300 ≤0.5 ≤25 / / / 7.5 104 10. Sediment of Irrigation Canal of Linwu County Table 6-10 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Sediment of Irrigation Canal of Linwu County Demonstration Area Monitoring factor Name of point location Monitoring result pH Name of demonstration Total Cr Available Cd (mg/kg) Pb (mg/kg) Hg (mg/kg) As (mg/kg) (dimensi area (mg/kg) Cd (mg/kg) onless) Detected value 28.7 0.42 24.5 0.058 28.6 0.12 7.68 Chengtou Village Wushui Town Over standard times 0 0 0 0 0.43 / / Detected value 39.2 0.37 231 0.075 33.8 0.072 7.83 Wenxi Village Nanqiang Town Over standard times 0 0 0 0 0.69 / / ≤250 ≤0.3 ≤250 ≤0.3 ≤30 / ＜6.5 Environmental Quality Standard for Soils (GB15618-1995) Level-II standard ≤300 ≤0.3 ≤300 ≤0.5 ≤25 / 6.5-7.5 ≤350 ≤0.6 ≤350 ≤1.0 ≤20 / >7.5 105 11. Sediment of Irrigation Canal of Lengshuitan Table 6-11 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Sediment of Irrigation Canal of Lengshuitan Demonstration Area Monitoring factor Name of Specific address of sample (village/group) Pb pH(dimensionless demonstration area Cd (mg/kg) As (mg/kg) Cr (mg/kg) Hg (mg/kg) (mg/kg) ) Irrigation Canal 39.6 0.715 12.5 66.8 0.093 6.94 Dengjiachong Xianghuaba Village Over standard Reservoir 0 1.38 0 0 0 / times Irrigation Canal 31.1 0.534 9.6 45.3 0.104 7.12 Shixijiang Village Lanjiang Over standard 0 0.78 0 0 0 / times Irrigation Canal 52.3 0.26 15.1 97.1 0.144 7.82 Muzitang Reservoir Over standard 0 0 0 0 0 / Qishan Village times Lishan Village Irrigation Canal 49.9 0.655 10.1 60.7 0.069 7.55 Shankou Reservoir Over standard 0 0.09 0 0 0 / times ≤250 ≤0.3 ≤30 ≤250 ≤0.3 pH＜6.5 Environmental Quality Standard for Soils (GB15618-1995) ≤300 ≤0.3 ≤25 ≤300 ≤0.5 6.5≤pH≤ 7.5 Level-II standard ≤350 ≤0.6 ≤20 ≤350 ≤1.0 pH＞7.5 106 12. Sediment of Irrigation Canal of Qiyang County Table 6-12 Monitoring and Evaluation Result of Sediment of Irrigation Canal of Qiyang Demonstration Area Name of Monitoring factor demonstratio Specific point location pH(dimensionle n area Total Cr (mg/kg) Cd (mg/kg) Pb(mg/kg) Hg(mg/kg) As(mg/kg) ss) Liaotang Village, Monitoring value 41.9 0.65 26.1 0.084 29.8 7.34 Baishui Town (Inlet of irrigation water in the Over standard times 0 1.17 0 0 0.19 / Baishui Demonstration Area) Demonstrati Xinzhong Village, Monitoring value 54.6 0.79 35.7 0.194 33.0 6.64 on Area Baishui Town (Inlet of irrigation water in the Over standard times 0 1.63 0 0 0.32 / Demonstration Area) Jinxing Village, Xiaojia Monitoring value 61.3 0.81 31.8 0.184 11.2 6.66 Town (Inlet of irrigation water source in the Demonstration Area) Over standard times 0 1.7 0 0 0 / Xiaojia Irrigation water inlet of Monitoring value 40.4 0.51 21.8 0.111 4.94 6.16 Demonstrati Niuling Village Area, on Area Xiaojia Town Over standard times 0 0.7 0 0 0 / Irrigation water inlet of Monitoring value 61.3 0.30 21.4 0.334 14.9 7.79 Niutouwan Village Area, Xiaojia Town Over standard times 0 0 0 0 0 / ≤250 ≤0.3 ≤250 ≤0.3 ≤30 pH＜6.5 Environmental Quality Standard for Soils (GB15618-1995) ≤300 ≤0.3 ≤300 ≤0.5 ≤25 6.5≤pH≤ 7.5 Level-II standard ≤350 ≤0.6 ≤350 ≤1.0 ≤20 pH＞7.5 Note: The inspection time is July 2017. 107 Appendix 7 Selection Sheet of Project Towns of Each Project County Table 7-1 Selection Sheet of Project Towns of Baojing County Index of Pollution factor Grain index Contaminated paddy field Emphasis of town No Name of Propor Propor Current state of management of pollutant government and Selected rice Are tion in tion in Analysis of pollutant source . Town Output source public participation towns a the the willingness (ton) (ha.) whole whole area county The town government Now, it is the the centralized area of industrial pays great attention Discharge of “three wastes” and park of enterprises with heavy metal pollution and it has developed exposed piling of slag yard waste (content is ≥0.9mg/kg and atmospheric dust fall); VIP pilot on treatment Qianling 1 946 11.38% 5777 11.46% Yes Cd of mining, smelting and other 10 enterprises with heavy metal pollution in the of heavy metals; in √ Town enterprises with heavy metal industrial park and 4 enterprises with heavy metal addition, the public in pollution. pollution in the town distributed in various the area has strong villages have been closed in 2013. willingness to participate in There is no enterprise with heavy The town government metal pollution in the town; pays little attention pollutant source may be high and willingness of the 2 Bi’er Town 323 3.89% 2029 4.03% Yes Cd No related management measure temporarily. background value of heavy metals public in the area to in soil and agricultural inputs participate in is not pollution. strong There is no enterprise with heavy The town government metal pollution in the town; pays great attention Qingshuipi pollutant source may be high and the public in the 3 758 9.12% 4555 9.04% Yes Cd No related management measure temporarily. ng Town background value of heavy metals area has strong in soil and agricultural inputs willingness to pollution. participate in There is no enterprise with heavy The town government metal pollution in the town; Some enterprises with heavy metal pollution in pays little attention Wanmipo pollutant source may be high the industrial park have been closed in 2013 and and willingness of the 4 493 5.93% 3026 6.01% Yes Cd Town background value of heavy metals the left problems are controlled; some problems public in the area to in soil and agricultural inputs are needed to be handled. participate in is not pollution. strong 108 Index of Pollution factor Grain index Contaminated paddy field Emphasis of town No Name of Propor Propor Current state of management of pollutant government and Selected rice Are tion in tion in Analysis of pollutant source . Town Output source public participation towns a the the willingness (ton) (ha.) whole whole area county Discharge of “three wastes”by The town government enterprises with heavy metal Enterprises with heavy metal pollution in the pays great attention Maogou pollution in the industrial park industrial park and the town have been closed and the public in the 5 868 10.45% 5239 10.40% Yes Cd Town pollutes agricultural land through while large amount of waste residues is needed to area has strong atmospheric dust fall and sewage be handled. willingness to irrigation. participate in The town government pays great attention Discharge of “three wastes” and and it has developed exposed piling of slag yard waste VIP pilot on treatment Fuxing Mining and smelting enterprises have been closed 6 1287 15.49% 7934 15.75% Yes Cd of (mining and smelting) of heavy metals; in √ Town and mining slags have been controlled enterprises with heavy metal addition, the public in pollution. the area has strong willingness to participate in There is no enterprise with heavy The town government metal pollution in the town; pays great attention pollutant source may be (lead zinc Purong and the public in the 7 491 5.91% 3051 6.05% Yes Cd ore) mineral slag loss of civil It has been naturally eliminated without left slags √ Town area has strong mining point in the history, high willingness to background value of heavy metals participate in in soil and agricultural inputs. There is no enterprise with heavy metal pollution in the town; The town government pollutant source may be (lead pays great attention Shuitianhe mercury ore) mineral slag loss of and the public in the 8 724 8.71% 4391 8.71% Yes Cd It has been naturally eliminated without left slags √ Town civil mining point in the history, area has strong high background value of heavy willingness to metals in soil and agricultural participate in inputs. 109 Index of Pollution factor Grain index Contaminated paddy field Emphasis of town No Name of Propor Propor Current state of management of pollutant government and Selected rice Are tion in tion in Analysis of pollutant source . Town Output source public participation towns a the the willingness (ton) (ha.) whole whole area county There is no enterprise with heavy The town government metal pollution in the town; pays little attention pollutant source may be (vanadium and willingness of the 9 Hulu Town 640 7.70% 3803 7.55% Yes Cd ore) mineral slag loss of civil It has been naturally eliminated without left slags public in the area to mining point in the history, high participate in is not background value of heavy metals strong in soil and agricultural inputs. The town government There is no enterprise with heavy pays great attention metal pollution in the town; and it has developed pollutant source may be (vanadium VIP pilot on treatment Lyudongsha 10 232 2.79% 1321 2.62% Yes Cd ore) mineral slag loss of civil It has been naturally eliminated without left slags of heavy metals; in √ n Town mining point in the history, high addition, the public in background value of heavy metals the area has strong in soil and agricultural inputs. willingness to participate in There is no enterprise with heavy The town government metal pollution in the town; pays great attention Yangchao pollutant source may be high and the public in the 11 741 8.92% 4404 8.74% Yes Cd No related management measure temporarily. Township background value of heavy metals area has strong in soil and agricultural inputs willingness to pollution. participate in There is no enterprise with heavy The town government metal pollution in the town; pays great attention pollutant source may be (mercury Changtanhe and willingness of the 12 807 9.71% 4860 9.64% Yes Cd ore) mineral slag loss of civil It has been naturally eliminated. Township public in the area to mining point in the history, high participate in is not background value of heavy metals strong in soil and agricultural inputs. 110 Index of Pollution factor Grain index Contaminated paddy field Emphasis of town No Name of Propor Propor Current state of management of pollutant government and Selected rice Are tion in tion in Analysis of pollutant source . Town Output source public participation towns a the the willingness (ton) (ha.) whole whole area county The selection of demonstration area shall take pollutant source caused by mineral enterprises with emphasis with reference to selection principle of demonstration area; evaluation index of setting and selection include: paddy field area, grain output and contamination of cultivated land, pollutant source, pollution pathways, management state of pollutant source and participation willingness of town governments. Thus, Qianling Town, Fuxing Town, Purong Town, Shuitianhe Town, Lyudongshan Town are selected as the project towns through evaluation and selection. 111 Table 7-2 Selection Sheet of Project Towns of Jishou City Index of agricultural land area Index of rice output Ranking Proportion Proportion of Pollutant Selecte in the Ranking of Emphasis of town Name of in total rice output in source and Current state of management of d No. Paddy cultivate Rice output rice output government and public Town cultivated total rice pollution pollutant source projec field area d land in 2015 in total rice participation willingness area of the outputs of pathway t town (ha.) area of (ton) output of the whole city the whole the whole whole city (%) city city The town government pays Sporadic small Jilue No related management measure little attention and willingness 1 359 3.24 10 807.75 3.14 10 area of mining Township temporarily. of the public in the area to land participate in is not strong During the period of “the 12th Five-year Plan”, enterprises with Mining land is The town government pays heavy metal pollution in the area Aizhai pretty huge and great attention and the public 2 978 8.84 7 2200.5 8.55 8 have taken effective treatment √ Town layout is in the area has strong measures based on related centralized willingness to participate in requirements of environmental protection department. The town government pays Sporadic small Majing’ao No related management measure little attention and willingness 3 2016 18.22 1 4536 17.63 1 area of mining Town temporarily. of the public in the area to land participate in is not strong The town government pays Sporadic small Shijiachong No related management measure little attention and willingness 4 1029 9.30 5 2315.25 9.00 5 area of mining Sub-district temporarily. of the public in the area to land participate in is not strong The town government pays Sporadic small Danqing No related management measure little attention and willingness 5 1427 12.89 3 3210.75 12.48 3 area of mining Town temporarily. of the public in the area to land participate in is not strong The town government pays Sporadic small Taiping No related management measure little attention and willingness 6 1246 11.26 4 2803.5 10.89 4 area of mining Town temporarily. of the public in the area to land participate in is not strong 7 Hexi Town 995 8.99 6 2238.75 8.70 6 Sporadic small No related management measure The town government pays 112 area of mining temporarily. little attention and willingness land of the public in the area to participate in is not strong The town government pays Sporadic small Donghe No related management measure little attention and willingness 8 480 4.34 9 1080 4.20 9 area of mining Sub-district temporarily. of the public in the area to land participate in is not strong During the period of “the 12th Five-year Plan”, enterprises with Mining land is The town government pays heavy metal pollution in the area Qianzhou pretty huge and great attention and the public 9 1436 12.98 2 3877.2 15.07 2 have taken effective treatment √ Sub-district layout is in the area has strong measures based on related centralized willingness to participate in requirements of environmental protection department. During the period of “the 12th Five-year Plan”, enterprises with Mining land is The town government pays heavy metal pollution in the area Shuangtang pretty huge and great attention and the public 10 844 7.63 8 2278.8 8.86 7 have taken effective treatment √ Sub-district layout is in the area has strong measures based on related centralized willingness to participate in requirements of environmental protection department. The town government pays Sporadic small Jifeng No related management measure little attention and willingness 11 126 1.14 12 189 0.73 12 area of mining Sub-district temporarily. of the public in the area to land participate in is not strong The town government pays Sporadic small Zhenxi No related management measure little attention and willingness 12 131 1.18 11 196.5 0.76 11 area of mining Sub-district temporarily. of the public in the area to land participate in is not strong Total 11067 100 25734 100.00 The selection of demonstration area shall take pollutant source caused by mineral enterprises with emphasis with reference to selection principle of demonstration area; evaluation index of setting and selection include: paddy field area, grain output and contamination of cultivated land, pollutant source, pollution pathways, management state of pollutant source and participation willingness of town governments. Thus, Aizhai Town, Qianzhou Sub-district and Shuangtang Sub-district are selected as the project towns through evaluation and selection. 113 Table 7-3 Yongshun County - Selection Sheet of Project Town Whether Emphasis of Selec there is risk town Cd Current state of ted Index of agricultural in Main pollutant government Rice index Content of heavy metals in soil content management of proje land agricultural source and public in rice pollutant source ct land and risk participation Name of town No. type willingness town Proportion Paddy Proportion of rice in cultivated Rice field output in total rice land area of output area outputs of the whole the whole (ton) (ha.) county(%) county(%) The town There were government illegal mining pays great There are 4 point locations in total; sites within the The illegal attention among them, there are 1 point scope of the No mining sites and the locations with Cd content of Cd town in the Shouche data have all been public in the 1 1036.1 2.62 2752.4 2.24 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 25%; pollution past, and the Town tempor cracked down area has and there are 3 point locations with risk pollutant source arily through control strong cadmium content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, was the and treatment. willingness accounting for 75%. discharge of to “three wastes” participate of these sites. in The town There are small government smelting pays great There are 7 point locations in total; No enterprises in No related attention among them, there are 7 point Cd Kesha data the scope of management and the 2 1411.2 3.56 4505.0 3.66 locations with Cd content of pollution Township tempor town, and the measure public in the 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting risk arily pollutant source temporarily. area has for100%. is the discharge strong “three wastes”. willingness to 114 Whether Emphasis of Selec there is risk town Cd Current state of ted Index of agricultural in Main pollutant government Rice index Content of heavy metals in soil content management of proje land agricultural source and public in rice pollutant source ct land and risk participation Name of town No. type willingness town Proportion Paddy Proportion of rice in cultivated Rice field output in total rice land area of output area outputs of the whole the whole (ton) (ha.) county(%) county(%) participate in There is no The town enterprise with government heavy metal There are 17 point locations; pays little pollution in the among them, there are 17 point attention town; pollutant locations with Cd content of No No related and Cd and As source may be Furong 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting data management willingness 3 2020.5 5.10 5299.5 4.31 pollution high Town for100%. There are 2 point tempor measure of the public risk background locations with As content of arily temporarily. in the area value of heavy 20-30mg/kg and 5 point locations to metals in soil with As content of 15-20mg/kg. participate and agricultural in is not inputs strong pollution. There are 18 point locations in There are The enterprises The town total; among them, there are 3 several nickel - with heavy government point locations with Cd No molybdenum metal pollution pays little Cd and As Yongmao content≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for data enterprises with have been attention 4 463.8 1.17 1586.1 1.29 pollution Town 16.67%; there are 7 point locations tempor heavy metal closed down, and risk with Cd content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, arily pollution in the and the tailings willingness accounting for 38.89%; there are 8 town, and the dams have been of the public point locations with Cd content of pollutant source controlled; no in the area 115 Whether Emphasis of Selec there is risk town Cd Current state of ted Index of agricultural in Main pollutant government Rice index Content of heavy metals in soil content management of proje land agricultural source and public in rice pollutant source ct land and risk participation Name of town No. type willingness town Proportion Paddy Proportion of rice in cultivated Rice field output in total rice land area of output area outputs of the whole the whole (ton) (ha.) county(%) county(%) 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for is discharge of new pollution to 44.44%. There are 8 point “three wastes”. will be caused. participate locations with As content of in is not 20-30mg/kg and 5 point locations strong with As content of 15-20mg/kg. The town There were government illegal mining There are 6 point locations; among pays great sites within the them, there are 6 point locations The illegal attention scope of the with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, No mining sites and the Cd and As town in the Daba accounting for 100%. There is 1 data have all been public in the 5 889.2 2.24 3844.2 3.12 pollution past, and the Township point location with As content of tempor cracked down area has risk pollutant source 15-20mg/kg and there are 5 point arily through control strong was the locations with As content ＜ and treatment. willingness discharge of 15mg/kg. to “three wastes” participate of these sites. in There are 6 point locations; among There is no The town them, there are 6 point locations No enterprise with No related government Cd Diaojing with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, data heavy metal management pays great 6 1072.8 2.71 2978.2 2.42 pollution Township accounting for 100%. There is 1 tempor pollution in the measure attention risk point location with As content of arily town; pollutant temporarily. and the 20-30mg/kg and there are 5 point source may be public in the 116 Whether Emphasis of Selec there is risk town Cd Current state of ted Index of agricultural in Main pollutant government Rice index Content of heavy metals in soil content management of proje land agricultural source and public in rice pollutant source ct land and risk participation Name of town No. type willingness town Proportion Paddy Proportion of rice in cultivated Rice field output in total rice land area of output area outputs of the whole the whole (ton) (ha.) county(%) county(%) locations with As content ＜ high area has 15mg/kg. background strong value of heavy willingness metals in soil to and agricultural participate inputs in pollution. There is no The town enterprise with government heavy metal There are 14 point locations; pays great pollution in the among them, there are 14 point attention town; pollutant locations with Cd content of No No related and the Cd source may be Fuzhi 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for data management public in the 7 1073.9 2.71 2823.3 2.29 pollution high Township 100%. There is 1 point location tempor measure area has risk background with As content of 15-20mg/kg arily temporarily. strong value of heavy and there are 13 point locations willingness metals in soil with As content ＜15mg/kg. to and agricultural participate inputs in pollution. There are 11 point locations in Cd and As No There is no No related The town Zhanggua 8 353.8 0.89 1204.2 0.98 total; among them, there are 2 pollution data enterprise with management government n Town point locations with Cd content risk tempor heavy metal measure pays little 117 Whether Emphasis of Selec there is risk town Cd Current state of ted Index of agricultural in Main pollutant government Rice index Content of heavy metals in soil content management of proje land agricultural source and public in rice pollutant source ct land and risk participation Name of town No. type willingness town Proportion Paddy Proportion of rice in cultivated Rice field output in total rice land area of output area outputs of the whole the whole (ton) (ha.) county(%) county(%) ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for arily pollution in the temporarily. attention 18.18%; there is 1 point location town; pollutant and with Cd content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, source may be willingness accounting for 9.10%; there are 8 high of the public point locations with Cd content of background in the area 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for value of heavy to 72.72%. There are 3 point metals in soil participate locations with As content of and agricultural in is not 15-20mg/kg. inputs strong pollution. There are 25 point locations in The town total; among them, there are 4 government point locations with Cd content There are small pays little ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for 16%; smelting attention there are 3 point locations with Cd enterprises in No No related and content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, Cd and As the scope of Qingping data management willingness 9 1157.9 2.92 2318.5 1.88 accounting for 12%; there are 18 pollution town, and the Town tempor measure of the public point locations with Cd content of risk pollutant source arily temporarily. in the area 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 72%. is the discharge to There are 3 point locations with As “three participate content of 20-30mg/kg, 6 point wastes”. in is not locations with As content of strong 15-20mg/kg and 12 point locations 118 Whether Emphasis of Selec there is risk town Cd Current state of ted Index of agricultural in Main pollutant government Rice index Content of heavy metals in soil content management of proje land agricultural source and public in rice pollutant source ct land and risk participation Name of town No. type willingness town Proportion Paddy Proportion of rice in cultivated Rice field output in total rice land area of output area outputs of the whole the whole (ton) (ha.) county(%) county(%) with As content ＜15mg/kg. The town There were The enterprises government enterprises with with heavy pays great heavy metal metal pollution attention There are 5 point locations; among No pollution have been and the Cd Yanjing them, there are 5 point locations data involved in lead closed down, public in the 10 745.5 1.88 1418.4 1.15 pollution Township with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, tempor zinc ore in the and the tailings area has risk accounting for 100%. arily town and the dams have been strong pollutant source controlled; no willingness is discharge of new pollution to “three wastes”. will be caused.. participate in There are 14 point locations in There is no The town total; among them, there are 6 enterprise with government point locations with Cd content heavy metal pays great ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for No pollution in the No related attention Cd and As Zejia 42.86%; there are 2 point locations data town; pollutant management and the 11 1633.3 4.12 4042.0 3.28 pollution Town with Cd content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, tempor source may be measure public in the risk accounting for 14.28%; there are 6 arily high temporarily. area has point locations with Cd content of background strong 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for value of heavy willingness 42.86%. There is 1 point location metals in soil to 119 Whether Emphasis of Selec there is risk town Cd Current state of ted Index of agricultural in Main pollutant government Rice index Content of heavy metals in soil content management of proje land agricultural source and public in rice pollutant source ct land and risk participation Name of town No. type willingness town Proportion Paddy Proportion of rice in cultivated Rice field output in total rice land area of output area outputs of the whole the whole (ton) (ha.) county(%) county(%) with As content of 15-20mg/kg and agricultural participate and 13 point locations with As inputs in content ＜15mg/kg. pollution. There are 30 point locations in There is no The town total; among them, there are 2 enterprise with government point locations with Cd content heavy metal pays little ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for 6.67%; pollution in the attention there is 1 point location with Cd town; pollutant No No related and content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, Cd and As source may be Shidi 12424. data management willingness 12 4646.4 11.73 10.1 accounting for 3.22%; there are 27 pollution high Town 0 tempor measure of the public point locations with Cd content of risk background arily temporarily. in the area 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for value of heavy to 90.0%. There are 6 point locations metals in soil participate with As content of 20-30mg/kg and agricultural in is not and 7 point locations with As inputs strong content of 15-20mg/kg. pollution. There are 15 point locations in There were The town total; among them, there is 1 point smelting government No No related location with Cd content of Cd enterprises and pays great Wanping data management 13 2118.9 5.35 7233.3 5.88 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for pollution fertilizer plants attention √ Town tempor measure 6.67%; there are 14 point locations risk in history in the and the arily temporarily. with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, town, and the public in the accounting for 93.33%. pollutant source area has 120 Whether Emphasis of Selec there is risk town Cd Current state of ted Index of agricultural in Main pollutant government Rice index Content of heavy metals in soil content management of proje land agricultural source and public in rice pollutant source ct land and risk participation Name of town No. type willingness town Proportion Paddy Proportion of rice in cultivated Rice field output in total rice land area of output area outputs of the whole the whole (ton) (ha.) county(%) county(%) is discharge of strong “three wastes”. willingness to participate in The town There were government illegal mining pays little sites within the The illegal attention scope of the There are 2 point locations; among No mining sites and Cd town in the Tawo them, there are 2 point locations data have all been willingness 14 2492.1 6.29 7683.0 6.24 pollution past, and the Town with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, tempor cracked down of the public risk pollutant source accounting for 100%. arily through control in the area was the and treatment. to discharge of participate “three wastes” in is not of these sites. strong There are 7 point locations in total; Guanping iron Enterprises The town among them, there is 1 point No ore in Taozixi with heavy government Cd Shaba location with Cd content of data Ore Area in the metal pollution pays great 15 2621.6 6.62 9422.0 7.66 pollution Town 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for tempor town; the have been attention risk 14.29%; there are 6 point locations arily pollutant source closed down and the with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, is discharge of and mine holes public in the 121 Whether Emphasis of Selec there is risk town Cd Current state of ted Index of agricultural in Main pollutant government Rice index Content of heavy metals in soil content management of proje land agricultural source and public in rice pollutant source ct land and risk participation Name of town No. type willingness town Proportion Paddy Proportion of rice in cultivated Rice field output in total rice land area of output area outputs of the whole the whole (ton) (ha.) county(%) county(%) accounting for 85.71%. “three wastes”. have been also area has closed, and no strong new pollution willingness will be caused. to participate in There is no The town enterprise with government There are 9 point locations in total; heavy metal pays little among them, there are 9 point pollution in the attention locations with Cd content of township; No No related and 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for Cd and As pollutant source Lingxi data management willingness 16 1512.5 3.82 5603.5 4.55 100%. There is 1 point location pollution may be high Town tempor measure of the public with As content of 20-30mg/kg, 5 risk background arily temporarily. in the area point locations with As content of value of heavy to 15-20mg/kg and 3 point locations metals in soil participate with As content ＜15mg/kg. and agricultural in is not inputs strong pollution. There are 8 point locations in total; No There were The illegal The town Cd and As Liangcha among them, there are 5 point data illegal mining mining sites government 17 796.2 2.01 2223.9 1.81 pollution Township locations with Cd content tempor sites within the have all been pays great risk ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for 62.5%; arily scope of the cracked down attention 122 Whether Emphasis of Selec there is risk town Cd Current state of ted Index of agricultural in Main pollutant government Rice index Content of heavy metals in soil content management of proje land agricultural source and public in rice pollutant source ct land and risk participation Name of town No. type willingness town Proportion Paddy Proportion of rice in cultivated Rice field output in total rice land area of output area outputs of the whole the whole (ton) (ha.) county(%) county(%) there are 3 point locations with Cd town in the through control and the content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, past, and the and treatment. public in the accounting for 37.5%. There is 1 pollutant source area has point location with As content of was the strong 20-30mg/kg and 7 point locations discharge of willingness with As content ＜15mg/kg. “three wastes” to of these sites. participate in There is no The town enterprise with government heavy metal pays little pollution in the attention township; There are 3 point locations; among No No related and Cd pollutant source Shaoha them, there are 3 point locations data management willingness 18 766.5 1.94 3688.9 3 pollution may be high Township with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, tempor measure of the public risk background accounting for 100%. arily temporarily. in the area value of heavy to metals in soil participate and agricultural in is not inputs strong pollution. Xiqi There are 20 point locations; No There is no No related The town 19 722.4 1.82 2207.6 1.79 No risk Township among them, there are 20 point data enterprise with management government 123 Whether Emphasis of Selec there is risk town Cd Current state of ted Index of agricultural in Main pollutant government Rice index Content of heavy metals in soil content management of proje land agricultural source and public in rice pollutant source ct land and risk participation Name of town No. type willingness town Proportion Paddy Proportion of rice in cultivated Rice field output in total rice land area of output area outputs of the whole the whole (ton) (ha.) county(%) county(%) locations with Cd content tempor heavy metal measure pays little ≤0.3mg/kg, accounting for 100%. arily pollution in the temporarily. attention town. and willingness of the public in the area to participate in is not strong There are 19 point locations in The town total; among them, there are 8 There were government point locations with Cd content illegal mining pays great ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for sites within the The illegal attention 42.11%; there is 1 point location scope of the No mining sites and the with Cd content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, Cd and As town in the Duishan data have all been public in the 20 559.3 1.41 1774.2 1.44 accounting for 5.26%; there are 10 pollution past, and the Township tempor cracked down area has point locations with Cd content of risk pollutant source arily through control strong 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for was the and treatment. willingness 52.63%. There are 2 point discharge of to locations with As content of “three wastes” participate 15-20mg/kg and 17 point locations of these sites. in with As content ＜15mg/kg. 124 Whether Emphasis of Selec there is risk town Cd Current state of ted Index of agricultural in Main pollutant government Rice index Content of heavy metals in soil content management of proje land agricultural source and public in rice pollutant source ct land and risk participation Name of town No. type willingness town Proportion Paddy Proportion of rice in cultivated Rice field output in total rice land area of output area outputs of the whole the whole (ton) (ha.) county(%) county(%) There are 12 point locations in The town total; among them, there is 1 point The enterprises government location with Cd content There are small with heavy pays great ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for 8.33%; smelting metal pollution attention there are 11 point locations with No enterprises in have been and the Cd and As Liexi Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, data the scope of closed down, public in the 21 863.5 2.18 2230.2 1.81 pollution Township accounting for 91.67%. There are tempor town, and the and the tailings area has risk 2 point locations with As content arily pollutant source dams have been strong of 20-30mg/kg, 2 point locations is the discharge controlled; no willingness with As content of 15-20mg/kg “three wastes”. new pollution to and 8 point locations with As will be caused.. participate content ＜15mg/kg. in There are 42 point locations in There is no The town total; among them, there is 1 point enterprise with government location with Cd content of heavy metal pays great 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for pollution in the attention No No related 2.38%; there are 41 point locations Cd and As township; and the Songbai 10985. data management 22 2619.4 6.61 8.93 with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, pollution pollutant source public in the Town 1 tempor measure accounting for 97.62%. There are risk may be high area has arily temporarily. 3 point locations with As content background strong of 20-30mg/kg, 14 point location value of heavy willingness with As content of 15-20mg/kg metals in soil to and 25 point locations with As and agricultural participate 125 Whether Emphasis of Selec there is risk town Cd Current state of ted Index of agricultural in Main pollutant government Rice index Content of heavy metals in soil content management of proje land agricultural source and public in rice pollutant source ct land and risk participation Name of town No. type willingness town Proportion Paddy Proportion of rice in cultivated Rice field output in total rice land area of output area outputs of the whole the whole (ton) (ha.) county(%) county(%) content ＜15mg/kg. inputs in pollution. There are 21 point locations in The town total; among them, there are 19 The enterprises government There are small point locations with Cd content of with heavy pays little smelting 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for metal pollution attention enterprises in 90.48%; there are 2 point locations No have been and Cd and As the scope of Gaoping with Cd content ≤0.3mg/kg, data closed down, willingness 23 1787.8 4.51 5390.0 4.38 pollution town, and the Township accounting for 9.52%. There are 3 tempor and the tailings of the public risk pollutant source point locations with As content of arily dams have been in the area is the discharge 20-30mg/kg, 6 point location with controlled; no to “three As content of 15-20mg/kg and 12 new pollution participate wastes”. point locations with As content ＜ will be caused. in is not 15mg/kg. strong There are 16 point locations in There are small The enterprises The town total; among them, there is 1 point smelting with heavy government location with Cd content enterprises in metal pollution pays little No ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for 6.25%; Cd and As the scope of have been attention Huilong data 24 379.9 0.96 1693.0 1.38 there are 6 point locations with Cd pollution town, and the closed down, and Township tempor content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, risk pollutant source and the tailings willingness arily accounting for 37.5%; there are 8 is the discharge dams have been of the public point locations with Cd content of “three controlled; no in the area 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 50%; wastes”. new pollution to 126 Whether Emphasis of Selec there is risk town Cd Current state of ted Index of agricultural in Main pollutant government Rice index Content of heavy metals in soil content management of proje land agricultural source and public in rice pollutant source ct land and risk participation Name of town No. type willingness town Proportion Paddy Proportion of rice in cultivated Rice field output in total rice land area of output area outputs of the whole the whole (ton) (ha.) county(%) county(%) and there is 1 point location with will be caused. participate Cd content ≤0.3mg/kg, accounting in is not for 6.25%. There are 5 point strong locations with As content of 20-30mg/kg and 2 point locations with As content of 15-20mg/kg. There is no The town enterprise with There are 6 point locations in total; government heavy metal among them, there is 1 point pays great pollution in the locations with Cd content attention town; pollutant ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for No No related and the Cd source may be Xiaoxi 16.67%; there are 3 point locations data management public in the 25 805.2 2.03 2409.4 1.96 pollution high Township with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, tempor measure area has risk background accounting for 50%; there are 2 arily temporarily. strong value of heavy point locations with Cd content willingness metals in soil ≤0.3mg/kg, accounting for to and agricultural 33.33%. participate inputs in pollution. There are 19 point locations in No There is no No related The town Cd and As Langxi total; among them, there are 9 data enterprise with management government 26 419.8 1.06 1574.7 1.28 pollution Township point locations with Cd content tempor heavy metal measure pays great risk ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for arily pollution in the temporarily. attention 127 Whether Emphasis of Selec there is risk town Cd Current state of ted Index of agricultural in Main pollutant government Rice index Content of heavy metals in soil content management of proje land agricultural source and public in rice pollutant source ct land and risk participation Name of town No. type willingness town Proportion Paddy Proportion of rice in cultivated Rice field output in total rice land area of output area outputs of the whole the whole (ton) (ha.) county(%) county(%) 47.37%; there are 2 point locations township; and the with Cd content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, pollutant source public in the accounting for 10.53%; there are 7 may be high area has point locations with Cd content of background strong 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for value of heavy willingness 36.84%; there is 1 point location metals in soil to with Cd content ≤0.3mg/kg, and agricultural participate accounting for 5.26%. There is 1 inputs in point location with As content of pollution. 20-30mg/kg, 2 point locations with As content of 15-20mg/kg and 16 point locations with As content ＜ 15mg/kg. There is no The town enterprise with government There are 4 point locations in total; heavy metal pays great among them, there is 1 point No pollution in the No related attention location with Cd content of Cd Runya data township; management and the 27 841.6 2.12 2636.3 2.14 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 25%; pollution Township tempor pollutant source measure public in the there are 3 point locations with Cd risk arily may be high temporarily. area has content ≤0.3mg/kg, accounting for background strong 75%. value of heavy willingness metals in soil to 128 Whether Emphasis of Selec there is risk town Cd Current state of ted Index of agricultural in Main pollutant government Rice index Content of heavy metals in soil content management of proje land agricultural source and public in rice pollutant source ct land and risk participation Name of town No. type willingness town Proportion Paddy Proportion of rice in cultivated Rice field output in total rice land area of output area outputs of the whole the whole (ton) (ha.) county(%) county(%) and agricultural participate inputs in pollution. The town There were government illegal mining pays great There are 3 point locations in total; sites within the The illegal attention among them, there are 2 point scope of the No mining sites and the locations with Cd content of Cd township in the Cheping data have all been public in the 28 982.2 2.48 4089.9 3.32 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for pollution past, and the Township tempor cracked down area has 66.67%; there is 1 point location risk pollutant source arily through control strong with Cd content ≤0.3mg/kg, was the and treatment. willingness accounting for 33.33%. discharge of to “three wastes” participate of these sites. in There are 14 point locations in There is no The town total; among them, there are 14 enterprise with government point locations with Cd content of No heavy metal No related pays little Cd and As Maoba 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for data pollution in the management attention 29 1786.7 4.51 4241.3 3.45 pollution Township 100%. There are 2 point locations tempor township; measure and risk with As content of 15-20mg/kg arily pollutant source temporarily. willingness and 12 point locations with As may be high of the public content ＜15mg/kg. background in the area 129 Whether Emphasis of Selec there is risk town Cd Current state of ted Index of agricultural in Main pollutant government Rice index Content of heavy metals in soil content management of proje land agricultural source and public in rice pollutant source ct land and risk participation Name of town No. type willingness town Proportion Paddy Proportion of rice in cultivated Rice field output in total rice land area of output area outputs of the whole the whole (ton) (ha.) county(%) county(%) value of heavy to metals in soil participate and agricultural in is not inputs strong pollution. There is no The town There are 17 point locations in enterprise with The enterprises government total; among them, there are 2 heavy metal with heavy pays great point locations with Cd content of pollution in the metal pollution attention 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for township; No have been and the 11.76%; there are 15 point Cd and As pollutant source Wanmin data closed down, public in the 30 1030.9 2.60 2780.2 2.26 locations with Cd content of pollution may be high Township tempor and the tailings area has 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for risk background arily dams have been strong 88.24%. There is 1 point location value of heavy controlled; no willingness with As content of 20-30mg/kg metals in soil new pollution to and 16 point locations with As and agricultural will be caused.. participate content ＜15mg/kg. inputs in pollution. 12306 Total 39610.6 100.00 100.00 2.3 130 Table 7-4 Selection Sheet of Project Towns of Huayuan County Index of agricultural land area Index of rice output 2014 Proportion Ranking Proportion in of rice Ranking of rice among Emphasis of town government Selected Name of cultivated land output in output among Pollutant source and pollution Current state of management No. Paddy field cultivated and public participation project Town area of the Rice output total rice total rice pathway of pollutant source area (ha.) land area of willingness town whole county (ton) outputs of outputs of the the whole (%) the whole whole county county county (%) During the period of “the 12th Five-year Plan”, enterprises with heavy The town government pays metal pollution in the area Longtan Mining land is pretty huge great attention and the public 1 1047 4.24 13 2230.0 3.88 14 have taken effective √ Town and layout is centralized in the area has strong treatment measures based willingness to participate in on related requirements of environmental protection department. The town government pays little attention and Sporadic small area of No related management 2 Minle Town 885 3.58 18 2522.0 4.39 12 willingness of the public in mining land measure temporarily. the area to participate in is not strong The town government pays little attention and Tuanjie Mining land is pretty huge No related management 3 1240 5.02 9 2378.0 4.14 13 willingness of the public in Town and layout is centralized measure temporarily. the area to participate in is not strong 4 Jiwei Town 2424.6 9.81 1 5833.0 10.16 1 Sporadic small area of No related management The town government pays 131 Index of agricultural land area Index of rice output 2014 Proportion Ranking Proportion in of rice Ranking of rice among Emphasis of town government Selected Name of cultivated land output in output among Pollutant source and pollution Current state of management No. Paddy field cultivated and public participation project Town area of the Rice output total rice total rice pathway of pollutant source area (ha.) land area of willingness town whole county (ton) outputs of outputs of the the whole (%) the whole whole county county county (%) mining land measure temporarily. little attention and willingness of the public in the area to participate in is not strong During the period of “the 12th Five-year Plan”, enterprises with heavy The town government pays metal pollution in the area Malichang Sporadic small area of great attention and the public 5 1493 6.04 7 4231.0 7.37 4 have taken effective √ Town mining land in the area has strong treatment measures based willingness to participate in on related requirements of environmental protection department. The town government pays little attention and Yayou Sporadic small area of No related management 6 1054 4.27 12 2091.0 3.64 15 willingness of the public in Town mining land measure temporarily. the area to participate in is not strong The town government pays Biancheng Sporadic small area of No related management little attention and 7 1214 4.91 10 3182.0 5.54 8 Town mining land measure temporarily. willingness of the public in the area to participate in is 132 Index of agricultural land area Index of rice output 2014 Proportion Ranking Proportion in of rice Ranking of rice among Emphasis of town government Selected Name of cultivated land output in output among Pollutant source and pollution Current state of management No. Paddy field cultivated and public participation project Town area of the Rice output total rice total rice pathway of pollutant source area (ha.) land area of willingness town whole county (ton) outputs of outputs of the the whole (%) the whole whole county county county (%) not strong During the period of “the 12th Five-year Plan”, enterprises with heavy The town government pays metal pollution in the area Huayuan Sporadic small area of great attention and the public 8 2080 8.42 3 5255.0 9.15 2 have taken effective √ Town mining land in the area has strong treatment measures based willingness to participate in on related requirements of environmental protection department. The town government pays little attention and Changle Sporadic small area of No related management 9 1573 6.37 5 3162.0 5.51 9 willingness of the public in Township mining land measure temporarily. the area to participate in is not strong The town government pays little attention and Lianghe Sporadic small area of No related management 10 1002 4.05 15 2017.0 3.51 16 willingness of the public in Township mining land measure temporarily. the area to participate in is not strong Paibi Sporadic small area of No related management The town government pays 11 1266 5.12 8 2910.0 5.07 10 Township mining land measure temporarily. little attention and 133 Index of agricultural land area Index of rice output 2014 Proportion Ranking Proportion in of rice Ranking of rice among Emphasis of town government Selected Name of cultivated land output in output among Pollutant source and pollution Current state of management No. Paddy field cultivated and public participation project Town area of the Rice output total rice total rice pathway of pollutant source area (ha.) land area of willingness town whole county (ton) outputs of outputs of the the whole (%) the whole whole county county county (%) willingness of the public in the area to participate in is not strong The town government pays little attention and Dongmaku Sporadic small area of No related management 12 1638 6.63 4 3617.0 6.30 7 willingness of the public in Township mining land measure temporarily. the area to participate in is not strong During the period of “the 12th Five-year Plan”, enterprises with heavy The town government pays metal pollution in the area Mao’er Mining land is pretty huge great attention and the public 13 1499 6.07 6 4376.0 7.62 3 have taken effective √ Township and layout is centralized in the area has strong treatment measures based willingness to participate in on related requirements of environmental protection department. During the period of “the The town government pays 12th Five-year Plan”, Dao’er Sporadic small area of great attention and the public 14 950 3.84 16 1365.0 2.38 18 enterprises with heavy √ Township mining land in the area has strong metal pollution in the area willingness to participate in have taken effective 134 Index of agricultural land area Index of rice output 2014 Proportion Ranking Proportion in of rice Ranking of rice among Emphasis of town government Selected Name of cultivated land output in output among Pollutant source and pollution Current state of management No. Paddy field cultivated and public participation project Town area of the Rice output total rice total rice pathway of pollutant source area (ha.) land area of willingness town whole county (ton) outputs of outputs of the the whole (%) the whole whole county county county (%) treatment measures based on related requirements of environmental protection department. The town government pays little attention and Paiwu Sporadic small area of No related management 15 1074 4.35 11 1913.0 3.33 17 willingness of the public in Township mining land measure temporarily. the area to participate in is not strong The town government pays little attention and Pailiao Sporadic small area of No related management 16 908 3.67 17 2595.0 4.52 11 willingness of the public in Township mining land measure temporarily. the area to participate in is not strong The town government pays little attention and Yaqiao Sporadic small area of No related management 17 1011 4.09 14 3626.0 6.31 6 willingness of the public in Township mining land measure temporarily. the area to participate in is not strong The town government pays Buchou Sporadic small area of No related management 18 2199 8.90 2 4130.0 7.19 5 little attention and Township mining land measure temporarily. willingness of the public in 135 Index of agricultural land area Index of rice output 2014 Proportion Ranking Proportion in of rice Ranking of rice among Emphasis of town government Selected Name of cultivated land output in output among Pollutant source and pollution Current state of management No. Paddy field cultivated and public participation project Town area of the Rice output total rice total rice pathway of pollutant source area (ha.) land area of willingness town whole county (ton) outputs of outputs of the the whole (%) the whole whole county county county (%) the area to participate in is not strong The town government pays little attention and Sporadic small area of No related management Total of the county 24712.21 100.00 57433.0 100.00 willingness of the public in mining land measure temporarily. the area to participate in is not strong The selection of demonstration area shall take pollutant source caused by mineral enterprises with emphasis with reference to selection principle of demonstration area; evaluation index of setting and selection include: paddy field area, grain output and contamination of cultivated land, pollutant source, pollution pathways, management state of pollutant source and participation willingness of town governments. Thus, Huayuan Town, Longtan Town, Malichang Town, Mao ’er Township are selected as the project towns through evaluation and selection. 136 Table 7-5 Cili County- Selection Sheet of Project Town Select Conta Conta Polluti Current state of management of pollutant ed Index of agricultural land Rice index minate minat on Main pollutant source source projec d rice ed soil factor t town No Proportion of Name of town . Proportion in rice output in Paddy Rice cultivated land total rice field area output area of the whole outputs of the (ha.) (ton) county (%) whole county(%) Exploitation of county Construct sewage processing plant in industrial industrial park, mining ore park; pipeline network collects “three wastes”; 1 Lingyang Town 1387 5.60% 8716.8 5.60% Yes Yes Cd and calcareous shale ore and mining ore and calcareous shale ore are closed; agricultural surface source tailings is waiting to be handled. pollution, etc. No mine, atmospheric Reduce use amount of agricultural inputs and 2 Yanbodu Town 1671 6.75% 10501.6 6.75% Yes Yes Cd sedimentation, agricultural develop construction of “cleaning engineering” and surface source pollution, etc. “beautiful countryside”. No mine, atmospheric Conduct environmental governance, construct Nanshanping 3 746 3.01% 4688.4 3.01% Yes Yes Cd sedimentation, soil parent beautiful countryside and reduce amount of Township material, etc. agricultural inputs. Nickel-molybdenum ore Ganyan The enterprise was closed in 2008 and “three 4 1807 7.30% 11356.2 7.30% Yes Yes Cd processing enterprise and Township wastes” of the enterprise are waiting to be treated “three wastes” pollution, etc. Atmospheric sedimentation, Develop “cleaning engineering”, “beautiful Yanghe domestic “three wastes” and countryside”, “equal urban and rural governance” 5 1268 5.12% 7968.8 5.12% No Township agricultural surface source and other environmental protection engineering pollution, etc. and measures. Atmospheric sedimentation, Develop “cleaning engineering”, “beautiful Xujiafang domestic “three wastes” and countryside”, “equal urban and rural governance” 6 1061 4.29% 6667.9 4.29% No Township agricultural surface source and other environmental protection engineering pollution, etc. and measures. 137 Select Conta Conta Polluti Current state of management of pollutant ed Index of agricultural land Rice index minate minat on Main pollutant source source projec d rice ed soil factor t town No Proportion of Name of town . Proportion in rice output in Paddy Rice cultivated land total rice field area output area of the whole outputs of the (ha.) (ton) county (%) whole county(%) Three nickel molybdenum processing enterprises, “three The enterprise has been closed in 2008 and “three 7 Xikou Town 655 2.65% 4116.4 2.65% Yes Yes Cd wastes” pollution and wastes” governance have been developed while the atmospheric sedimentation, pollutant source is not cut off. etc. Nickel molybdenum ore exploration area, “three Ore was closed and exploration was stopped in Jinyan 8 812 3.28% 5103.1 3.28% Yes Yes Cd wastes” pollution and 2008 while tailings slag governance has not been Township atmospheric sedimentation, completed. etc. The ore was closed and exploration was stopped in Nickel molybdenum ore 2008 to develop ecological environment Dongxi exploration area, and rehabilitation and protection and govern tailings 9 622 2.51% 3909 2.51% Yes Yes Cd, As Township atmospheric sedimentation, dam with total investment of 100 million Yuan; etc. Phase I and Phase II have been accepted and Phase III governance is under acceptance. It was closed in 2008; ecological environment Nickel molybdenum ore area, rehabilitation and protection was developed to smelting plant and 10 Gaoqiao Town 1087 4.39% 6831.3 4.39% Yes Yes Cd, As complete governance on tailings dam of Baizhuyu Yes atmospheric sedimentation, and Huanglinyu; ore slag has been backfilled and etc. waste water processing is qualified. Marble exploration and Have developed construction of “beautiful Longtanhe 11 1469 5.94% 9232 5.94% Yes Yes Cd processing; atmospheric countryside”; tailings and enterprise “three wastes” Town sedimentation; agricultural are to be governed. 138 Select Conta Conta Polluti Current state of management of pollutant ed Index of agricultural land Rice index minate minat on Main pollutant source source projec d rice ed soil factor t town No Proportion of Name of town . Proportion in rice output in Paddy Rice cultivated land total rice field area output area of the whole outputs of the (ha.) (ton) county (%) whole county(%) surface source pollution, etc. Atmospheric sedimentation, Develop “cleaning engineering”, “beautiful Erfangping domestic “three wastes” and countryside”, “equal urban and rural governance” 12 1179 4.76% 7409.5 4.76% Yes Yes Town agricultural surface source and other environmental protection engineering pollution, etc. and measures. Atmospheric sedimentation, Develop “cleaning engineering”, “beautiful domestic “three wastes” and countryside”, “equal urban and rural governance” 13 Lingxi Town 2110 8.53% 13260.4 8.53% No No agricultural surface source and other environmental protection engineering pollution, etc. and measures. Exploration of Bailong coal It has been closed; the waste water governance 14 Miaoshi Town 419 1.69% 2633.2 1.69% No No ore and atmospheric project was started in 2016 at the county level and sedimentation, etc. it is under governance at present. “Three wastes” pollution of Guangfuqiao Guangfuqiao Coal Ore and It was closed in 2008 and “three wastes” are to be 15 786 3.18% 4939.7 3.18% No No Town atmospheric sedimentation, governed. etc. Zhuangta Reservoir is Yangliupu polluted by Zhuangta Coal Zhuangta Coal Ore has been closed and irrigation 16 845 3.41% 5310.4 3.41% Yes Yes Cd, As Yes Township Ore, resulting in sewage water source is qualified after being inspected irrigation Zhuangta Reservoir is Dongyueguan Zhuangta Coal Ore has been closed and irrigation 17 940 3.80% 5907.5 3.80% Yes Yes Cd, As polluted by Zhuangta Coal Yes Town water source is qualified after being inspected Ore, resulting in sewage 139 Select Conta Conta Polluti Current state of management of pollutant ed Index of agricultural land Rice index minate minat on Main pollutant source source projec d rice ed soil factor t town No Proportion of Name of town . Proportion in rice output in Paddy Rice cultivated land total rice field area output area of the whole outputs of the (ha.) (ton) county (%) whole county(%) irrigation Zhuangta Reservoir is Tongjinpu polluted by Zhuangta Coal Zhuangta Coal Ore has been closed and irrigation 18 995 4.02% 6253.1 4.02% Yes Yes Cd, As Yes Town Ore, resulting in sewage water source is qualified after being inspected irrigation Zhuangta Reservoir is pulluted by Zhuangta Coal Zhuangta Coal Ore has been closed and water Shamuqiao 19 864 3.49% 5429.9 3.49% Yes Yes Cd Ore, belonging to Xigan source of Zhuangta Reservoir is qualified after Town Channel Irrigation Area, being inspected resulting in sewage irrigation Atmospheric sedimentation, Develop “cleaning engineering”, “beautiful domestic “three wastes” and countryside”, “equal urban and rural governance” 20 Xiangshi Town 530 2.14% 3330.8 2.14% No No agricultural surface source and other environmental protection engineering pollution, etc. and measures. “Three wastes” pollution of Huangchang was closed in 2002 and coal ore is 21 Sanhe Town 727 2.94% 4568.9 2.94% Yes Yes Cd, As Huangchang and Zhuangta Yes closed; slags have been basically governed Coal Ore Atmospheric sedimentation, Develop “cleaning engineering”, “beautiful domestic “three wastes” and countryside”, “equal urban and rural governance” 22 Jiangya Town 1048 4.23% 6586.2 4.23% No No agricultural surface source and other environmental protection engineering pollution, etc. and measures. Zhaojiagang Atmospheric sedimentation, Develop “cleaning engineering”, “beautiful 23 589 2.38% 3701.6 2.38% No No Township domestic “three wastes” and countryside”, “equal urban and rural governance” 140 Select Conta Conta Polluti Current state of management of pollutant ed Index of agricultural land Rice index minate minat on Main pollutant source source projec d rice ed soil factor t town No Proportion of Name of town . Proportion in rice output in Paddy Rice cultivated land total rice field area output area of the whole outputs of the (ha.) (ton) county (%) whole county(%) agricultural surface source and other environmental protection engineering pollution, etc. and measures. Atmospheric sedimentation, Develop “cleaning engineering”, “beautiful Sanguansi domestic “three wastes” and countryside”, “equal urban and rural governance” 24 871 3.52% 5473.8 3.52% No No Township agricultural surface source and other environmental protection engineering pollution, etc. and measures. Atmospheric sedimentation, Develop “cleaning engineering”, “beautiful Gaofeng domestic “three wastes” and countryside”, “equal urban and rural governance” 25 262 1.06% 1646.6 1.06% No No Township agricultural surface source and other environmental protection engineering pollution, etc. and measures. 141 Table 7-6 Zhongfang County-Selection Sheet of Project Town Index of agricultural land area Index of rice output Analysis on risk of agricultural land pollution Ranki Emphasis Ranking ng of town Proportion of rice Whether among governme Sele Proportion of rice output there is cultiva Pollutant source Current state of nt and cted Name of Cultivated in cultivated Rice output output in among risk in No. ted Rice contamination index and pollution management of public proj Town land area land area of IN 2016 total rice total rice Content of heavy metals in soil agricultu land pathway pollutant source participat ect (ha.) the whole (ton) outputs of outputs ral land area of ion town county (%) the whole of the and risk the willingnes county (%) whole type whole s county county There are 42 point locations in total; Among them, there is 1 The point location with Cd content town ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for governm 2.38%; 1 point location with Cd Coal ore ent pays content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, exploration and Coal ore has been little accounting for 2.38%; 18 point livestock farm closed; 15 pig attention locations with Cd content of pollution pollute farms have been and Cd and 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for the water source relocated; willingn Zhongfang As 1 3112.19 15.88% 2 14088.00 15.33% 2 42.86%; 22 point locations with No data temporarily through surface harmless ess of Town pollutio Cd content≤0.3mg/kg, runoff which is treatment has the n risk accounting for 52.38%. used for been conducted public in Among them, there is 1 irrigation of for existing the area point location with As content＞ agricultural livestock farms to 40mg/kg, accounting for 2.38%; land. participa 2 point locations with As te in is content of 30-40mg/kg, not accounting for 4.76%; 4 point strong locations with As content of 20-30mg/kg, accounting for 142 Index of agricultural land area Index of rice output Analysis on risk of agricultural land pollution Ranki Emphasis Ranking ng of town Proportion of rice Whether among governme Sele Proportion of rice output there is cultiva Pollutant source Current state of nt and cted Name of Cultivated in cultivated Rice output output in among risk in No. ted Rice contamination index and pollution management of public proj Town land area land area of IN 2016 total rice total rice Content of heavy metals in soil agricultu land pathway pollutant source participat ect (ha.) the whole (ton) outputs of outputs ral land area of ion town county (%) the whole of the and risk the willingnes county (%) whole type whole s county county 9.52%; 35 point locations with As content ＜20mg/kg, accounting for 83.34%. There are 40 point locations in There are 18 point locations The total; in total in the town; Coal ore has been town Coal ore Among them, there is 0 point Among them, there are 3 closed; naked ore governm exploration and location with Cd content point locations with Cd slags have been ent pays livestock farm ≥0.9mg/kg; 17 point locations content＜0.2mg/kg, covered and with great pollution pollute with Cd content of Cd and accounting for 16.67%; 8 trees planted; 5 attention the water source Tongmu 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for As point locations with Cd pig farms have and the 2 1587.90 8.10% 5 7317.80 7.96% 5 through surface √ Town 42.5%; 20 point locations with pollutio content of 0.2-0.4mg/kg, been relocated; public in runoff which is Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, n risk accounting for 44.44%; 6 harmless the area used for accounting for 50%; 3 point point location with Cd treatment has has irrigation of locations with Cd content of 0.4-0.6mg/kg, been conducted strong agricultural content≤0.3mg/kg, accounting accounting for 33.33%; 1 for existing willingn land. for 7.5%. point location with Cd livestock farms ess to Among them, there is 1 point content＞0.6mg/kg, participa 143 Index of agricultural land area Index of rice output Analysis on risk of agricultural land pollution Ranki Emphasis Ranking ng of town Proportion of rice Whether among governme Sele Proportion of rice output there is cultiva Pollutant source Current state of nt and cted Name of Cultivated in cultivated Rice output output in among risk in No. ted Rice contamination index and pollution management of public proj Town land area land area of IN 2016 total rice total rice Content of heavy metals in soil agricultu land pathway pollutant source participat ect (ha.) the whole (ton) outputs of outputs ral land area of ion town county (%) the whole of the and risk the willingnes county (%) whole type whole s county county location with As content of accounting for 5.56%. te in 20-30mg/kg, accounting for Among them, there are 12 2.5%; 39 point locations with As point locations with As content＜20mg/kg, accounting content of ＜0.2mg/kg, for 97.5%. accounting for 66.67%; 6 point locations with As content of 0.2-0.4mg/kg, accounting for 33.33%. There are 179 point locations in There are 83 point locations The Coal ore total; in total in the town. Among Coal ore has been town exploration, Among them, there are 21 them, there are 24 point closed; naked ore governm stone pit, cement point locations with Cd content locations with Cd content＜ slags have been ent pays plant dust ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for 0.2mg/kg, accounting for covered and with great pollution and 11.73%; 72 point locations with Cd and 28.92%; 32 point locations trees planted; 3 attention livestock farm Luyang Cd content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, As with Cd content of pig farms have and the 3 4310.39 22.00% 1 20633.00 22.45% 1 pollution pollute √ Town accounting for 40.22%; 60 point pollutio 0.2-0.4mg/kg, accounting been relocated; public in water source locations with Cd content of n risk for 38.55%; 20 point harmless the area through surface 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for locations with Cd content of treatment has has runoff which is 33.52%; 26 point locations with 0.4-0.6mg/kg, accounting been conducted strong used for Cd content≤0.3mg/kg, for 24.10%; 7 point for existing willingn irrigation of accounting for 14.53%. locations with Cd content＞ livestock farms ess to agricultural land Among them, there is 1 0.6mg/kg, accounting for participa 144 Index of agricultural land area Index of rice output Analysis on risk of agricultural land pollution Ranki Emphasis Ranking ng of town Proportion of rice Whether among governme Sele Proportion of rice output there is cultiva Pollutant source Current state of nt and cted Name of Cultivated in cultivated Rice output output in among risk in No. ted Rice contamination index and pollution management of public proj Town land area land area of IN 2016 total rice total rice Content of heavy metals in soil agricultu land pathway pollutant source participat ect (ha.) the whole (ton) outputs of outputs ral land area of ion town county (%) the whole of the and risk the willingnes county (%) whole type whole s county county point location with As content of 8.43%. te in 30-40mg/kg, accounting for Among them, there are 70 0.56%; 14 point locations with point locations with As As content of 20-30mg/kg, content of ＜0.2mg/kg, accounting for 7.82%; 164 point accounting for 84.34%; 12 locations with As content＜ point locations with As 20mg/kg, accounting for content of 0.2-0.4mg/kg, 91.62%. accounting for 14.46%; 1 point location with As content of 0.4-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 1.2%. There are 40 point locations in Coal ore and Coal ore and The total; phosphorite phosphorite have town Among them, there are 9 exploration and been closed; 9 governm point locations with Cd content livestock farm livestock farms ent pays Cd and ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for pollution pollute have been little Huaqiao As 4 2360.10 12.04% 3 11965.00 13.02% 3 22.5%; 14 point locations with No data temporarily water source relocated; attention Town pollutio Cd content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, through surface harmless and n risk accounting for 35%; 17 point runoff which treatment has willingn locations with Cd content of which is used been conducted ess of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for for irrigation of for existing the 42.5%. agricultural land livestock farms public in 145 Index of agricultural land area Index of rice output Analysis on risk of agricultural land pollution Ranki Emphasis Ranking ng of town Proportion of rice Whether among governme Sele Proportion of rice output there is cultiva Pollutant source Current state of nt and cted Name of Cultivated in cultivated Rice output output in among risk in No. ted Rice contamination index and pollution management of public proj Town land area land area of IN 2016 total rice total rice Content of heavy metals in soil agricultu land pathway pollutant source participat ect (ha.) the whole (ton) outputs of outputs ral land area of ion town county (%) the whole of the and risk the willingnes county (%) whole type whole s county county Among them, there is 1 the area point location with As content＞ to 40mg/kg, accounting for 2.5%; 1 participa point location with As content of te in is 30-40mg/kg, accounting for not 2.5%; 3 point locations with As strong content of 20-30mg/kg, accounting for 7.5%; 35 point locations with As content＜ 20mg/kg, accounting for 87.5%. There are 43 point locations in The total; town Among them, there is 1 governm point location with Cd content ent pays ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for Cd and little Background Continue to 2.33%; 0 point location with Cd As attention 5 Tiepo Town 1770.22 9.03% 4 7395.00 8.05% 4 No data temporarily value of soil is strengthen content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg; 11 pollutio and pretty high monitoring point locations with Cd content n risk willingn of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for ess of 25.58%; 31 point locations with the Cd content≤0.3mg/kg, public in accounting for 72.09%. the area 146 Index of agricultural land area Index of rice output Analysis on risk of agricultural land pollution Ranki Emphasis Ranking ng of town Proportion of rice Whether among governme Sele Proportion of rice output there is cultiva Pollutant source Current state of nt and cted Name of Cultivated in cultivated Rice output output in among risk in No. ted Rice contamination index and pollution management of public proj Town land area land area of IN 2016 total rice total rice Content of heavy metals in soil agricultu land pathway pollutant source participat ect (ha.) the whole (ton) outputs of outputs ral land area of ion town county (%) the whole of the and risk the willingnes county (%) whole type whole s county county Among them, there is 1 to point location with As content＞ participa 40mg/kg, accounting for 2.33%; te in is 1 point location with As content not of 30-40mg/kg, accounting for strong 2.33%; 5 point locations with As content of 20-30mg/kg, accounting for 11.63%; 36 point locations with Cd content＜ 20mg/kg, accounting for 83.71%. The There are 3 point locations in town total; governm Among them, there are 3 ent pays point locations with Cd content Continue to little Jielong of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for No pollutant 6 647.60 3.30% 11 3262.00 3.55% 11 No risk No data temporarily strengthen attention Town 100%. source monitoring and Among them, there are 3 willingn point locations with As content ess of ＜20mg/kg, accounting for the 100%. public in 147 Index of agricultural land area Index of rice output Analysis on risk of agricultural land pollution Ranki Emphasis Ranking ng of town Proportion of rice Whether among governme Sele Proportion of rice output there is cultiva Pollutant source Current state of nt and cted Name of Cultivated in cultivated Rice output output in among risk in No. ted Rice contamination index and pollution management of public proj Town land area land area of IN 2016 total rice total rice Content of heavy metals in soil agricultu land pathway pollutant source participat ect (ha.) the whole (ton) outputs of outputs ral land area of ion town county (%) the whole of the and risk the willingnes county (%) whole type whole s county county the area to participa te in is not strong The town governm There are 3 point locations in ent pays total; little 2 pig farms have Among them, there are 3 attention been relocated; point locations with Cd content and Cd harmless Tongding of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for Livestock farm willingn 7 945.41 4.82% 9 4146.00 4.51% 9 pollutio No data temporarily treatment has Town 100%. pollution ess of n risk been conducted Among them, there are 3 the for existing point locations with As content public in livestock farms ＜20mg/kg, accounting for the area 100%. to participa te in is not 148 Index of agricultural land area Index of rice output Analysis on risk of agricultural land pollution Ranki Emphasis Ranking ng of town Proportion of rice Whether among governme Sele Proportion of rice output there is cultiva Pollutant source Current state of nt and cted Name of Cultivated in cultivated Rice output output in among risk in No. ted Rice contamination index and pollution management of public proj Town land area land area of IN 2016 total rice total rice Content of heavy metals in soil agricultu land pathway pollutant source participat ect (ha.) the whole (ton) outputs of outputs ral land area of ion town county (%) the whole of the and risk the willingnes county (%) whole type whole s county county strong There are 31 point locations in There are 20 point locations total; in the town in total; among Among them, there is 1 them, there are 6 point point location with Cd content locations with Cd content The ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for ＜0.2mg/kg, accounting for Coal ore has been town 3.22%; 8 point locations with Cd 30%; 6 point locations with closed; naked ore governm content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, Cd content of 0.2-0.4mg/kg, slags have been ent pays Coal ore accounting for 25.81%; 17 point accounting for 30%; 4 point covered and with great exploration and locations with Cd content of locations with Cd content of trees planted; 4 attention Cd and livestock farm 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 0.4-0.6mg/kg, accounting livestock farms and the Tongwan As pollution pollute 8 1533.41 7.83% 6 7143.60 7.77% 6 54.84%; 5 point locations with for 20%; 4 point locations have been public in √ Town pollutio water source Cd content ≤0.3mg/kg, with Cd content ＞ relocated; the area n risk which is used accounting for 16.13%. 0.6mg/kg, accounting for harmless has for irrigation of Among them, there is 1 point 20%. treatment has strong agricultural land location with As content＞ Among them, there are 18 been conducted willingn 40mg/kg, accounting for 3.22%; point locations with As for existing ess to 2 point locations with As content ＜0.2mg/kg, livestock farms participa content of 20-30mg/kg, accounting for 90%; 2 point te in accounting for 6.45%; 28 point locations with As content of locations with As content＜ 0.2-0.4mg/kg, accounting 20mg/kg, accounting for for 100%. 149 Index of agricultural land area Index of rice output Analysis on risk of agricultural land pollution Ranki Emphasis Ranking ng of town Proportion of rice Whether among governme Sele Proportion of rice output there is cultiva Pollutant source Current state of nt and cted Name of Cultivated in cultivated Rice output output in among risk in No. ted Rice contamination index and pollution management of public proj Town land area land area of IN 2016 total rice total rice Content of heavy metals in soil agricultu land pathway pollutant source participat ect (ha.) the whole (ton) outputs of outputs ral land area of ion town county (%) the whole of the and risk the willingnes county (%) whole type whole s county county 90.33%. The town There are 6 point locations in governm total; ent pays Among them, there is 1 little point location with Cd content attention of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for and 16.67%; 5 point locations with Cd and Background Continue to willingn Xinluhe Cd content≤0.3mg/kg, As 9 1162.60 5.93% 7 5069.90 5.52% 7 No data temporarily value of soil is strengthen ess of Town accounting for 83.33%. pollutio pretty high monitoring the Among them, there is 1 n risk public in point location with As content＞ the area 40mg/kg, accounting for to 16.67%; 5 point locations with participa As content＜20mg/kg, te in is accounting for 100%. not strong There are 6 point locations in Pretty high 2 livestock farms The Cd Yuanjia total; background has been closed, town 10 830.21 4.24% 10 4126.00 4.49% 10 pollutio No data temporarily Town Among them, there are 2 value of soil and and harmless governm n risk point locations with Cd content livestock farm treatment has ent pays 150 Index of agricultural land area Index of rice output Analysis on risk of agricultural land pollution Ranki Emphasis Ranking ng of town Proportion of rice Whether among governme Sele Proportion of rice output there is cultiva Pollutant source Current state of nt and cted Name of Cultivated in cultivated Rice output output in among risk in No. ted Rice contamination index and pollution management of public proj Town land area land area of IN 2016 total rice total rice Content of heavy metals in soil agricultu land pathway pollutant source participat ect (ha.) the whole (ton) outputs of outputs ral land area of ion town county (%) the whole of the and risk the willingnes county (%) whole type whole s county county of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for pollution been conducted little 33.33%; 4 point locations with for 3 livestock attention Cd content≤0.3mg/kg, farms. and accounting for 66.67%. willingn Among them, there are 6 ess of point locations with As content the ＜20mg/kg, accounting for public in 100%. the area to participa te in is not strong There are 39 point locations in There are 28 point locations Coal ore Coal ore has been The total; in total in the town. Among exploration, closed; naked ore town Among them, there are 4 them, there are 10 point high iron ore slags have been governm point locations with Cd content Cd locations with Cd content＜ slag and covered and with ent pays Xinjian 11 963.40 4.92% 8 4650.00 5.06% 8 ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for pollutio 0.2mg/kg, accounting for livestock farm trees planted; 7 great √ Town 10.26%; 14 point locations with n risk 35.71%; 12 point locations pollution pollute pig farms have attention Cd content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, with Cd content of water source been relocated; and the accounting for 35.9%; 20 point 0.2-0.4mg/kg, accounting through surface harmless public in locations with Cd content of for 42.86%; 6 point runoff which is treatment has the area 151 Index of agricultural land area Index of rice output Analysis on risk of agricultural land pollution Ranki Emphasis Ranking ng of town Proportion of rice Whether among governme Sele Proportion of rice output there is cultiva Pollutant source Current state of nt and cted Name of Cultivated in cultivated Rice output output in among risk in No. ted Rice contamination index and pollution management of public proj Town land area land area of IN 2016 total rice total rice Content of heavy metals in soil agricultu land pathway pollutant source participat ect (ha.) the whole (ton) outputs of outputs ral land area of ion town county (%) the whole of the and risk the willingnes county (%) whole type whole s county county 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for locations with Cd content of used for been conducted has 51.28%; 1 point location with 0.4-0.6mg/kg, accounting irrigation of for existing strong Cd content ≤0.3mg/kg, for 21.43%; 0 point location agricultural land livestock farms willingn accounting for 2.56%. with Cd content＞0.6mg/kg. ess to Among them, there are 7 Among them, there are 28 participa point locations with As content point locations with As te in of 20-30mg/kg, accounting for content of ＜0.2mg/kg, 9.52%; 32 point locations with accounting for 100%. As content＜20mg/kg, accounting for 83.34%. There are 3 point locations in The total; town Among them, there is 1 governm point location with Cd content ent pays of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for little Cd Background Continue to Haojiping 33.33%; 2 point locations with attention 12 372.30 1.90% 12 2099.00 2.28% 12 pollutio No data temporarily value of soil is strengthen Township Cd content ≤0.3mg/kg, and n risk pretty high monitoring accounting for 66.67%. willingn Among them, there are 3 ess of point locations with As content the ＜20mg/kg, accounting for public in 100%. the area 152 Index of agricultural land area Index of rice output Analysis on risk of agricultural land pollution Ranki Emphasis Ranking ng of town Proportion of rice Whether among governme Sele Proportion of rice output there is cultiva Pollutant source Current state of nt and cted Name of Cultivated in cultivated Rice output output in among risk in No. ted Rice contamination index and pollution management of public proj Town land area land area of IN 2016 total rice total rice Content of heavy metals in soil agricultu land pathway pollutant source participat ect (ha.) the whole (ton) outputs of outputs ral land area of ion town county (%) the whole of the and risk the willingnes county (%) whole type whole s county county to participa te in is not strong Total of the 19595.73 91895.3 county 153 Table 7-7 Selection Sheet of Project Towns of Anhua County Index of management of pollutant agricultural Index of rice output participation willingness government and public Selected project town Pollutant source and land area pollution pathway Emphasis of town Current state of Whether 2016Proportio Ranking there is n of rice of rice source Name of Land risk in No. Paddy Proporti output in output Content of heavy metals in soil Cd content in rice Town area agricultura field on in Rice total rice among l land and area land output outputs of total rice risk type (ha.) area(%) (ton) the whole outputs of county the whole (%) county “Three wastes” discharge of enterprises with heavy metal pollution There are 20 point locations in total; pollute among them, there are 5 point locations agricultural The town with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting land through government for 25%; 2 point locations with Cd atmospheric pays great Gaoming content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for Cd and As dust fall and attention and 1 Townshi 9750 412 4.23% 3087 1.68% 19 10%; 5 point locations with Cd content pollution No data temporarily sewage the public in p of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 25%; 8 risk irrigation. the area has point locations with Cd content “Three strong ≤0.3mg/kg, accounting for 40%. There wastes” willingness to is 1 point location with compound Cd discharge of participate in and As pollution. enterprises with heavy metal pollution pollute agricultural land through atmospheric 154 dust fall and sewage irrigation. There are 21 point locations in total in the town. Among them, “Three There are 36 point locations in total; there are 15 point locations with wastes” among them, there are 15 point locations Cd content ＜0.2mg/kg, discharge of The town with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting accounting for 71.43%; 1 point enterprises government for 41.67%; 8 point locations with Cd location with Cd content of with heavy pays great content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for Cd and As 0.2-0.4mg/kg, accounting for metal pollution Having attention and Qingtang 2 23400 1408 6.02% 10558 5.76% 7 22.22%; 7 point locations with Cd pollution 4.76%; 3 point locations with Cd pollute been the public in √ pu town content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for risk content of 0.4-0.6mg/kg, agricultural controlled the area has 19.44%; 6 point locations with Cd accounting for 14.29%; 2 point land through strong content≤0.3mg/kg, accounting for locations with Cd content ＞ atmospheric willingness to 16.67%. There are 3 point locations with 0.6mg/kg, accounting for 9.52%. dust fall and participate in compound Cd and As pollution. There are 2 point locations with sewage compound Cd and As pollution irrigation. “Three wastes” discharge of The town enterprises government There are 5 point locations in total; with heavy pays little among them, there are 2 point locations metal pollution attention and Le’an with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, Cd pollution 3 19190 2400 12.51% 18003 9.81% 2 No data temporarily pollute willingness Town accounting for 40%; 3 point locations risk agricultural of the public with Cd content ≤0.3mg/kg, accounting land through in the area to for 60%. atmospheric participate in dust fall and is not strong sewage irrigation. There are 8 point locations in total; “Three The town among them, there are 2 point locations Cd and Hg wastes” government Meichen 4 18620 2316 12.44% 17367 9.47% 4 with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, pollution No data temporarily discharge of pays little g Town accounting for 25%; 6 point locations risk enterprises attention and with Cd content≤0.3mg/kg, accounting with heavy willingness 155 for 75%. Hg in 2 point locations exceeds metal pollution of the public standard. pollute in the area to agricultural participate in land through is not strong atmospheric dust fall and sewage irrigation. “Three wastes” discharge of The town There are 8 point locations in total; enterprises government among them, there is 1 point location with heavy pays little with Cd content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, metal pollution attention and Xianxi accounting for 12.5%; 4 point locations Cd pollution 5 28140 1355 4.82% 10161 5.54% 8 No data temporarily pollute willingness Town with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, risk agricultural of the public accounting for 50%; 3 point locations land through in the area to with Cd content ≤0.3mg/kg, accounting atmospheric participate in for 37.5%. dust fall and is not strong sewage irrigation. There are 20 point locations in “Three There are 25 point locations in total; total in the town. Among them, wastes” among them, there are 19 point locations there is 1 point location with Cd discharge of The town with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting content ＜0.2mg/kg, accounting enterprises government for 76%; 4 point locations with Cd for 5%; 1 point location with Cd with heavy pays great content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for Cd, As and content of 0.2-0.4mg/kg, metal pollution attention and Changtan 16%; 2 point locations with Cd content Hg 6 17700 1525 8.62% 11438 6.23% 6 accounting for 5%; 1 point pollute the public in √ g Town of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 8%. pollution location with Cd content of agricultural the area has There are 4 point locations with risk 0.4-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 5%; land through strong compound Cd and As pollution, 1 point 17 point locations with Cd content atmospheric willingness to location with compound Cd and Hg ＞0.6mg/kg, accounting for 85%. dust fall and participate in pollution and 1 point location with There are 2 point locations with sewage compound Cd, As and Hg pollution. compound Cd and As pollution . irrigation. Dafu There are 10 point locations in total; Cd and As “Three The town 7 22600 2537 11.23% 19025 10.37% 1 No data temporarily Town among them, there are 4 point locations pollution wastes” government 156 with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting risk discharge of pays little for 40%; 1 point location with Cd enterprises attention and content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for with heavy willingness 10%; 1 point location with Cd content of metal pollution of the public 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 10%; 3 pollute in the area to point locations with Cd content agricultural participate in ≤0.3mg/kg, accounting for 30%. There land through is not strong is 1 point location with compound Cd atmospheric and As pollution . dust fall and sewage irrigation. “Three wastes” discharge of The town enterprises government There are 5 point locations in total; with heavy pays great among them, there are 3 point locations metal pollution attention and Taoxi with Cd content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, Cd pollution 8 15420 624 4.05% 4683 2.55% 16 No data temporarily pollute the public in Town accounting for 60%; 2 point locations risk agricultural the area has with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, land through strong accounting for 40%. atmospheric willingness to dust fall and participate in sewage irrigation. “Three wastes” The town discharge of government enterprises There are 5 point locations in total; pays little with heavy among them, there is 1 point location attention and Xiaoyan Cd pollution metal pollution 9 17705 753 4.25% 5650 3.08% 13 with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting No data temporarily willingness Town risk pollute for 20%; 4 point locations with Cd of the public agricultural content ≤0.3mg/kg, accounting for 80%. in the area to land through participate in atmospheric is not strong dust fall and sewage 157 irrigation. There are 20 point locations in “Three total in the town. Among them, wastes” there are 6 point locations with Cd There are 25 point locations in total; discharge of The town content ＜0.2mg/kg, accounting among them, there are 8 point locations enterprises government for 30%; 1 point location with Cd with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting with heavy pays great content of 0.2-0.4mg/kg, for 32%; 3 point locations with Cd metal pollution Having attention and Jiangnan Cd pollution accounting for 5%; 5 point 10 13140 1285 9.78% 9636 5.25% 9 content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for pollute been the public in √ Town risk locations with Cd content of 12%;11 point locations with Cd content agricultural controlled the area has 0.4-0.6mg/kg, accounting for of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 44%; 3 land through strong 25%; 8 point locations with Cd point locations with Cd atmospheric willingness to content＞0.6mg/kg, accounting content≤0.3mg/kg, accounting for 12%. dust fall and participate in for 40%. There are 8 point sewage locations with compound Cd and irrigation. As pollution . “Three wastes” discharge of The town enterprises government There are 5 point locations in total; with heavy pays great Tianzhua among them, there are 2 point locations metal pollution attention and ng with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, Cd pollution 11 20770 734 3.53% 5505 3.00% 14 No data temporarily pollute the public in Townshi accounting for 40%; 3 point locations risk agricultural the area has p with Cd content≤0.3mg/kg, accounting land through strong for 60%. atmospheric willingness to dust fall and participate in sewage irrigation. “Three The town There are 10 point locations in total; wastes” government among them, there are 7 point locations discharge of pays little Yangjiaot with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, Cd pollution enterprises attention and 12 ang 24680 1930 7.82% 14475 7.89% 5 No data temporarily accounting for 70%; 3 point locations risk with heavy willingness Town with Cd content≤0.3mg/kg, accounting metal pollution of the public for 30%. pollute in the area to agricultural participate in 158 land through is not strong atmospheric dust fall and sewage irrigation. “Three wastes” discharge of The town There are 10 point locations in total; enterprises government among them, there are 8 point locations with heavy pays great with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, Cd and Hg metal pollution attention and Lengshi 13 18304 779 4.26% 5843 3.19% 12 accounting for 80%; 2 point locations pollution No data temporarily pollute the public in Town with Cd content ≤0.3mg/kg, accounting risk agricultural the area has for 20%. There is 1 point location with land through strong compound Cd and Hg pollution . atmospheric willingness to dust fall and participate in sewage irrigation. “Three wastes” discharge of The town enterprises government with heavy pays great There are 5 point locations in total; Longtang metal pollution attention and among them, there are 5 point locations Cd pollution 14 Townshi 14200 656 4.62% 4920 2.68% 15 No data temporarily pollute the public in with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, risk p agricultural the area has accounting for 100%. land through strong atmospheric willingness to dust fall and participate in sewage irrigation. There are 46 point locations in total; There are 21 point locations in “Three The town among them, there are 12 point locations Cd and As total in the town. Among them, wastes” Having government Dongpin 15 19750 2336 11.83% 17518 9.55% 3 with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting pollution there are 21 point locations with discharge of been pays great √ g Town for 26.09%; 8 point locations with Cd risk Cd content＞0.6mg/kg, enterprises controlled attention and content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for accounting for 100%. with heavy the public in 159 17.39%; 23 point locations with Cd metal pollution the area has content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for pollute strong 50%; 3 point locations with Cd content agricultural willingness to ≤0.3mg/kg, accounting for 6.52%. There land through participate in are 3 point locations with compound Cd atmospheric and As pollution. dust fall and sewage irrigation. “Three wastes” discharge of The town There are 12 point locations in total; enterprises government among them, there is 1 point location with heavy pays great with Cd content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, metal pollution attention and Zhexi accounting for 8.33%; 4 point locations Cd pollution 16 14250 167 1.17% 1250 0.68% 24 No data temporarily pollute the public in Town with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, risk agricultural the area has accounting for 33.33%; 7 point locations land through strong with Cd content≤0.3mg/kg, accounting atmospheric willingness to for 58.33%. dust fall and participate in sewage irrigation. The town “Three government There are 86 point locations in There are 14 point locations in total; wastes” pays great total in the town. Among them, among them, there are 3 point locations discharge of attention and there are 43 point locations with with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting enterprises the public in Cd content＜0.2mg/kg, for 21.43%; 1 point location with Cd with heavy the area has accounting for 50%; 13 point content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for Cd and As metal pollution strong Malu locations with Cd content of 17 28492 912 3.20% 6838 3.73% 10 7.14%; 6 point locations with Cd content pollution pollute willingness to Town 0.2-0.4mg/kg, accounting for of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 42.86%; risk agricultural participate in, 15.12%; 6 point locations with Cd 4 point locations with Cd content land through and VIP pilot content of 0.4-0.6mg/kg, ≤0.3mg/kg, accounting for 28.57%. atmospheric treatment of accounting for 6.98%; 24 point There is 1 point location with compound dust fall and heavy metals locations with Cd content＞ Cd and As pollution. sewage has been 0.6mg/kg, accounting for 27.90%. irrigation. being implemented. 160 There are 46 point locations in total in the town. Among them, there is 1 point location with Cd There are 57 point locations in total; “Three content＜0.2mg/kg, accounting among them, there are 16 point locations wastes” for 2.17%; 9 point locations with with Cd content≥0.9mg/kg, accounting discharge of The town Cd content of 0.2-0.4mg/kg, for 28.07%; 19 point locations with Cd enterprises government accounting for 19.57%; 5 point content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for with heavy pays great Cd, As and locations with Cd content of 33.33%; 19 point locations with Cd metal pollution Having attention and Kuixi Hg 0.4-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 18 24224 820 3.39% 6150 3.35% 11 content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for pollute been the public in √ Town pollution 10.87%; 31 point locations with 33.33%; 3 point locations with Cd agricultural controlled the area has risk Cd content＞0.6mg/kg, content ≤0.3mg/kg, accounting for land through strong accounting for 67.39%. There are 5.26%. There are 8 point locations with atmospheric willingness to 3 point locations with compound compound Cd and As pollution and 2 dust fall and participate in Cd and As pollution, 3 point point locations with compound Cd and sewage locations with compound Cd and Hg pollution. irrigation. Hg pollution and 2 point locations with compound Cd and Hg pollution. “Three wastes” discharge of The town enterprises government There are 10 point locations in total; with heavy pays great among them, there is 1 point location metal pollution attention and Yanxi Cd pollution 19 19600 432 2.20% 3242 1.77% 18 with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting No data temporarily pollute the public in Town risk for 10%; 9 point locations with Cd agricultural the area has content ≤0.3mg/kg, accounting for 90%. land through strong atmospheric willingness to dust fall and participate in sewage irrigation. There are 5 point locations in total; “Three The town among them, there is 1 point location wastes” government Qujiang Cd pollution 20 8623 174 2.02% 1305 0.71% 23 with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, No data temporarily discharge of pays great Town risk accounting for 20%; 4 point locations enterprises attention and with Cd content ≤0.3mg/kg, accounting with heavy the public in 161 for 80%. metal pollution the area has pollute strong agricultural willingness to land through participate in atmospheric dust fall and sewage irrigation. The town government pays great There are 5 point locations in total; attention and Pingkou among them, there are 5 point locations 21 10340 332 3.21% 2488 1.36% 20 No risk No data temporarily the public in Town with Cd content ≤0.3mg/kg, accounting the area has for 100%. strong willingness to participate in “Three wastes” discharge of The town enterprises government There are 5 point locations in total; with heavy pays great among them, there are 3 point locations Nanjin metal pollution attention and with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, Cd pollution 22 Townshi 19484 253 1.30% 1894 1.03% 22 No data temporarily pollute the public in accounting for 60%; 2 point locations risk p agricultural the area has with Cd content ≤0.3mg/kg, accounting land through strong for 40%. atmospheric willingness to dust fall and participate in sewage irrigation. There are 5 point locations in total; “Three The town among them, there are 2 point locations wastes” government Gulou with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, Cd pollution discharge of pays great 23 Townshi 17183 322 1.87% 2415 1.32% 21 No data temporarily accounting for 40%; 3 point locations risk enterprises attention and p with Cd content ≤0.3mg/kg, accounting with heavy the public in for 60%. metal pollution the area has 162 pollute strong agricultural willingness to land through participate in atmospheric dust fall and sewage irrigation. Total 425565 24462 183451 The selection of demonstration area shall take pollutant source caused by mineral enterprises with emphasis with reference to selection principle of demonstration area; evaluation index of setting and selection include: paddy field area, grain output and contamination of cultivated land, pollutant source, pollution pathways, management state of pollutant source and participation willingness of town governments. Thus, Qingtangpu Town, Changtang Town, Jiangnan Town, Dongping Town and Kuixi Town are selected as the project towns through evaluation and selection. 163 Table 7-8 Selection Sheet of Project Towns of Hengnan County Index of cultivated Whether Grain index Emphasis of town land area there is risk Land Current state of government and Name of in Pollutant source and Selected area Proportio Content of heavy metals in soil management of public Town Area Output Proporti agricultural pollution pathway towns (ha.) n of land pollutant source participation (ha.) (ton) on (%) land and (%) willingness risk type There are 22 point locations: among them, there are 3 point locations with Cd content ≦ 0.3, accounting for 13.64%; 9 point locations with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting The town for 40.9%; 7 point locations with Cd content government pays Agricultural land pollution No related of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 31.82%; 3 great attention and Cd and As resulted from waste water, management Yunji Town 10180 2491.3 24.47% 21868 3.46% point locations with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, the public in the area pollution risk residue and dust discharge measures accounting for 13.64%. There are 7 point has strong of smelting plants. temporarily. locations with As content ≤15mg/kg, willingness to accounting for 31.82%; 8 point locations with participate in As content of 15-20mg/kg, accounting for 36.36%; 7 point locations with As content ≥20mg/kg, accounting for 31.82%. There are 30 point locations: among them, Motor plant, nitrogen In recent years, The town there is 0 point location with Cd content≦0.3, fertilizer plant, bearing plants and pig government pays accounting for 0%; 14 point locations with Cd plant and pig farm have farms resulting in great attention and Xiangyang content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for Cd pollution been constructed in the 12840 2400.9 18.70% 33253 5.26% pollution have the public in the area √ Town 46.67%; 13 point locations with Cd content of risk upstream area previously; been completely has strong 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 43.33%; 3 point the demonstration area is closed or willingness to locations with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, suffered from serious removed. participate in accounting for 10%. pollution due to direct 164 Index of cultivated Whether Grain index Emphasis of town land area there is risk Land Current state of government and Name of in Pollutant source and Selected area Proportio Content of heavy metals in soil management of public Town Area Output Proporti agricultural pollution pathway towns (ha.) n of land pollutant source participation (ha.) (ton) on (%) land and (%) willingness risk type discharge of “three wastes” of these plants. Random discharge of There are 20 point locations: among them, “three wastes” by The town there is 0 point location with Cd content≦0.3, enterprises around government pays accounting for 0%; 6 point locations with Cd No related Xiangjiang River in great attention and Liaotian content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 30%; Cd pollution management 11600 2271.9 19.59% 25298 4.00% previous years results in the public in the area Town 9 point locations with Cd content of risk measure pollution of irrigation has strong 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 45%; 5 point temporarily. water; excessive input of willingness to locations with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, agricultural fertilizer participate in accounting for 25%. pollutes agricultural land. There are 33 point locations: among them, there are 3 point locations with Cd content≦ The pig farms 0.3, accounting for 9.1%; 19 point locations have been The town with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting The main pollutant source governed; Leishui government pays for 57.58%; 5 point locations with Cd content is upstream industrial and shall not be used great attention and Chashi of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 15.15%; 6 Cd and As mining enterprise to irrigate; 7010 2386.5 34.04% 19314 3.06% the public in the area √ Town point locations with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, pollution risk pollution of Leishui River, pollutant source has strong accounting for 18.18%. There are 9 point the irrigation water source, is basically willingness to locations with As content ≤15mg/kg, and 2 local pig farms. controlled, and no participate in accounting for 27.27%; 9 point locations with new pollution As content of 15-20mg/kg, accounting for will be caused. 27.27%; 15 point locations with As content 165 Index of cultivated Whether Grain index Emphasis of town land area there is risk Land Current state of government and Name of in Pollutant source and Selected area Proportio Content of heavy metals in soil management of public Town Area Output Proporti agricultural pollution pathway towns (ha.) n of land pollutant source participation (ha.) (ton) on (%) land and (%) willingness risk type ≥20mg/kg, accounting for 45.46%. Specific pollutant source There are 29 point locations: among them, is unclear which may be The town there are 7 point locations with Cd content≦ due to fish feed with government pays 0.3, accounting for 24.13%; 19 point locations No related heavy metals seriously great attention and Guanshi with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting Cd pollution management 8400 3385.2 40.30% 34400 5.44% exceeding standard, which the public in the area Town for 65.52%; 1 point location with Cd content risk measure results in pollution of has strong of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 3.45%; 2 temporarily. irrigation water, as well as willingness to point locations with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, excessive input of participate in accounting for 6.9%. agricultural fertilizer. Waste water and residue Various quarrying generated by three basalt plants have been quarrying plants including closed up to 2015 There are 23 point locations: among them, Fangyuan Quarrying without left The town there are 7 point locations with Cd content≦ Plant, etc., result in residues basically government pays 0.3, accounting for 30.43%; 12 point locations historical pollution of now, which won’t great attention and Jiangkou with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting Cd pollution 10000 3178.4 31.78% 32930 5.21% demonstration area and result in new the public in the area √ Town for 52.17%; 2 point locations with Cd content risk surrounded area; pollution for the has strong of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 8.7%; 2 point catastrophic flood in 2006 demonstration willingness to locations with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, and 2007 resulted in area; sludge, participate in accounting for 8.7%. flow-backward of Leishui pollutant and River, which brought alien species massive sludge and resulted from 166 Index of cultivated Whether Grain index Emphasis of town land area there is risk Land Current state of government and Name of in Pollutant source and Selected area Proportio Content of heavy metals in soil management of public Town Area Output Proporti agricultural pollution pathway towns (ha.) n of land pollutant source participation (ha.) (ton) on (%) land and (%) willingness risk type pollutants and polluted catastrophic flood plough layer. have been basically cleaned up which won’t result in new pollution. There are 32 point locations: among them, there are 20 point locations with Cd content≦ 0.3, accounting for 62.5%; 12 point locations Specific pollutant source with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting is unclear, which is may The town for 37.5%; 0 point location with Cd content of be due to unreasonable government pays No related 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 0%; 0 point discharge of domestic great attention and Baogai Cd and As management 17650 3593.5 20.36% 32100 5.08% location with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, waste, which results in the public in the area Town pollution risk measure accounting for 0%. There are 2 point locations pollution of irrigation has strong temporarily. with As content ≤15mg/kg, accounting for water, as well as excessive willingness to 6.25%; 2 point locations with As content of input of agricultural participate in 15-20mg/kg, accounting for 6.25%; 28 point fertilizer. locations with As content ≥20mg/kg, accounting for 87.5%. Huaqiao There are 19 point locations: among them, 2 iron ore and tungsten ore The iron ore plant The town Town, there are 10 point locations with Cd content≦ Cd and As smelting plants were and tungsten ore government pays 14500 2582.3 17.81% 30982 4.90% √ Jiangkou 0.3, accounting for 52.64%; 7 point locations pollution risk constructed in 1940s. smelting plant great attention and Town, with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting Waste water and residue of have been closed the public in the area 167 Index of cultivated Whether Grain index Emphasis of town land area there is risk Land Current state of government and Name of in Pollutant source and Selected area Proportio Content of heavy metals in soil management of public Town Area Output Proporti agricultural pollution pathway towns (ha.) n of land pollutant source participation (ha.) (ton) on (%) land and (%) willingness risk type Chashi for 36.84%; 1 point location with Cd content pollutant factors including down 50 years has strong Town, of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 5.26%; 1 iron and tungsten lead ago, and now, willingness to Xiangyang point location with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, result in historical there is no left participate in Town, accounting for 5.26%. There is 1 point pollution of demonstration residue basically, Qishan location with As content ≤15mg/kg, area and surrounded area. and no new Sub-district accounting for 5.26%; 2 point locations with pollution will be Office As content of 15-20mg/kg, accounting for caused to the 10.53%; 16 point locations with As content demonstration ≥20mg/kg, accounting for 84.21%. area. There are 12 point locations: among them, there is 1 point location with Cd content≦0.3, accounting for 8.33%; 10 point locations with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for The town 83.33%; 1 point location with Cd content of Main pollutant source is government pays 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 8.33%; 0 point local fluorite ore; This mine was great attention, but Tiesitang Cd and As 7340 1632.8 22.25% 20160 3.19% location with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, excessive agricultural closed down in willingness of the Town pollution risk accounting for 0%. There is 1 point location fertilizer input pollutes 2010. public in the area to with As content ≤15mg/kg, accounting for agricultural land. participate in is not 8.33%; 3 point locations with As content of strong. 15-20mg/kg, accounting for 25%; 8 point locations with As content ≥20mg/kg, accounting for 66.67%. Quanxi 5500 1779.1 32.35% 14980 2.37% There are 15 point locations: among them, Cd and As Catastrophic flood in 2006 No related The town 168 Index of cultivated Whether Grain index Emphasis of town land area there is risk Land Current state of government and Name of in Pollutant source and Selected area Proportio Content of heavy metals in soil management of public Town Area Output Proporti agricultural pollution pathway towns (ha.) n of land pollutant source participation (ha.) (ton) on (%) land and (%) willingness risk type Town there is 0 point location with Cd content≦0.3, pollution risk and 2007 resulted in management government pays accounting for 0%; 11 point locations with Cd flow-backward of Leishui measure great attention and content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for River which brought temporarily. the public in the area 73.34%; 2 point locations with Cd content of massive sludge and has strong 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 13.33%; 2 point pollutants and polluted willingness to locations with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, plough horizon; excessive participate in accounting for 13.33%. There is 0 point agricultural fertilizer input location with As content ≤15mg/kg, pollutes agricultural land. accounting for 0%; 0 point location with As content of 15-20mg/kg, accounting for 0%; 5 point locations with As content ≥20mg/kg, accounting for 100%. There are 23 point locations: among them, there are 5 point locations with Cd content≦ Catastrophic flood in 2006 0.3, accounting for 21.73%; 16 point locations and 2007 resulted in The town with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting flow-backward of Leishui government pays No related for 69.57%; 1 point location with Cd content River which brought great attention and Hongshan Cd and As management 11163 3086.4 27.65% 39911 6.31% of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 4.35%; 1 massive sludge and the public in the area Town pollution risk measure point location with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, pollutants and polluted has strong temporarily. accounting for 4.35%. There are 14 point plough horizon; excessive willingness to locations with As content ≤15mg/kg, agricultural fertilizer input participate in accounting for 60.87%; 7 point locations with pollutes agricultural land. As content of 15-20mg/kg, accounting for 169 Index of cultivated Whether Grain index Emphasis of town land area there is risk Land Current state of government and Name of in Pollutant source and Selected area Proportio Content of heavy metals in soil management of public Town Area Output Proporti agricultural pollution pathway towns (ha.) n of land pollutant source participation (ha.) (ton) on (%) land and (%) willingness risk type 30.43%; 2 point locations with As content ≥20mg/kg, accounting for 8.7%. Waste water, residue and There are 27 point locations: among them, dust generated by The town there are 2 point locations with Cd content≦ surrounded cement plant government pays 0.3, accounting for 7.41%; 14 point locations Cement plant and and smelting plant result great attention, but Santang with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting Cd pollution smelting plant 6780 2168.1 31.98% 23240 3.68% in agricultural land willingness of the Town for 51.85%; 8 point locations with Cd content risk were closed in pollution; domestic public in the area to of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 29.63%; 3 2012. sewage flows into participate in is not point locations with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, irrigation water, which strong. accounting for 11.11%. results in pollution. Discharge of “three There are 34 point locations: among them, wastes” of barite ore The town there is 0 point location with Cd content≦0.3, results in pollution of The plant was government pays accounting for 0%; 26 point locations with Cd irrigation water source; closed in 2008, great attention, but Tanzishan content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for Cd pollution slag accumulation metal 11058 2998.1 27.11% 28152 4.45% but the residue willingness of the Town 76.47%; 7 point locations with Cd content of risk liquid flows into has not been public in the area to 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 20.59%; 1 point agricultural land with rain cleared yet. participate in is not location with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, to pollute it; excessive strong. accounting for 2.94%. agricultural fertilizer pollutes agricultural land Jilong There are 19 point locations: among them, Cd pollution Specific pollutant source No related The town 10800 2092.7 19.38% 14720 2.33% Town there is 1 point location with Cd content≦0.3, risk is unclear, which may be management government pays 170 Index of cultivated Whether Grain index Emphasis of town land area there is risk Land Current state of government and Name of in Pollutant source and Selected area Proportio Content of heavy metals in soil management of public Town Area Output Proporti agricultural pollution pathway towns (ha.) n of land pollutant source participation (ha.) (ton) on (%) land and (%) willingness risk type accounting for 5.26%; 6 point locations with due to unreasonable measure great attention and Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for discharge of domestic temporarily. the public in the area 31.58%; 6 point locations with Cd content of waste which results in has strong 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 31.58%; 6 point pollution of irrigation willingness to locations with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, water, as well as excessive participate in accounting for 31.58%. input of agricultural fertilizer. Arsenic smelting plant was constructed in the area Arsenic smelting There are 28 point locations: among them, and waste water and plant was closed The town there are 2 point locations with Cd content≦ residue with As pollution in 2007; government pays 0.3, accounting for 7.14%; 20 point locations factor result in As prevention and great attention and Quanhu with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting Cd pollution 9045 2404.2 26.58% 26965 4.27% pollution of surrounded control on the public in the area √ Town for 71.43%; 4 point locations with Cd content risk area; excessive agricultural has strong of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 14.29%; 2 agricultural fertilizer input surface source willingness to point locations with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, results in pollution of local pollution has participate in accounting for 7.14%. agricultural land to a been enhanced. certain degree. There are 15 point locations: among them, Specific pollutant source The town No related there is 0 point location with Cd content≦0.3, is unclear, which may be government pays Zhashi Cd pollution management 7960 1780.8 22.37% 20201 3.20% accounting for 0%; 12 point locations with Cd due to fish feed with great attention and Town risk measure content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 80%; heavy metals seriously the public in the area temporarily. 2 point locations with Cd content of exceeding standard, which has strong 171 Index of cultivated Whether Grain index Emphasis of town land area there is risk Land Current state of government and Name of in Pollutant source and Selected area Proportio Content of heavy metals in soil management of public Town Area Output Proporti agricultural pollution pathway towns (ha.) n of land pollutant source participation (ha.) (ton) on (%) land and (%) willingness risk type 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 13.33%; 1 point results in pollution of willingness to location with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, irrigation water, as well as participate in accounting for 6.67%. excessive input of agricultural fertilizer. Specific pollutant source There are 8 point locations: among them, there is unclear, which may be The town is 0 point location with Cd content≦0.3, due to fish feed with government pays accounting for 0%; 6 point locations with Cd No related heavy metals seriously great attention and Maoshi content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 75%; Cd pollution management 15600 3175.1 20.35% 28603 4.53% exceeding standard, which the public in the area Town 2 point locations with Cd content of risk measure results in pollution of has strong 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 25%; 0 point temporarily. irrigation water, as well as willingness to location with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, excessive input of participate in accounting for 0%. agricultural fertilizer. There are 50 point locations: among them, The town there are 4 point locations with Cd content≦ Irrigation water Main source is the water government pays 0.3, accounting for 8%; 9 point locations with source has been source of Xiangjiang great attention and Lijiang Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for Cd pollution gradually 13100 3682.9 28.11% 34861 5.52% River polluted by the public in the area √ Town 18%; 20 point locations with Cd content of risk changed, and no industrial and mineral has strong 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 40%; 17 point new pollution enterprise pollution. willingness to locations with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, will be generated. participate in accounting for 34%. Liushi There are 24 point locations: among them, Cd and As Specific pollutant source No related The town 12000 3126.6 26.06% 33534 5.31% Town there is 0 point location with Cd content≦0.3, pollution risk is unclear, which may be management government pays 172 Index of cultivated Whether Grain index Emphasis of town land area there is risk Land Current state of government and Name of in Pollutant source and Selected area Proportio Content of heavy metals in soil management of public Town Area Output Proporti agricultural pollution pathway towns (ha.) n of land pollutant source participation (ha.) (ton) on (%) land and (%) willingness risk type accounting for 0%; 11 point locations with Cd due to fish feed with measure great attention and content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for heavy metals seriously temporarily. the public in the area 45.83%; 11 point locations with Cd content of exceeding standard, which has strong 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 45.83%; 2 point results in pollution of willingness to locations with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, irrigation water, as well as participate in accounting for 8.34%. There are 10 point excessive input of locations with As content ≤15mg/kg, agricultural fertilizer. accounting for 41.67%; 9 point locations with As content of 15-20mg/kg, accounting for 37.5%; 5 point locations with As content ≥20mg/kg, accounting for 20.83%. Random discharge of There are 11 point locations: among them, “three wastes” by The town there is 0 point location with Cd content≦0.3, enterprises around government pays accounting for 0%; 1 point location with Cd No related Xiangjiang River in great attention and Jinweizhou content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 9.1%; Cd pollution management 12000 1627.9 13.57% 18000 2.85% previous years results in the public in the area Town 10 point locations with Cd content of risk measure pollution of irrigation has strong 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 90.9%; 0 point temporarily. water; excessive input of willingness to location with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, agricultural fertilizer participate in accounting for 0%. pollutes agricultural land. There are 19 point locations: among them, Residue of smelting plant The smelting The town Chejiang Cd pollution 11200 2241.1 20.01% 29208.3 4.62% there is 1 point location with Cd content≦0.3, is piled; residue and liquid plant was closed government pays Town risk accounting for 5.26%; 4 point locations with flow into agricultural land in 2010. great attention, but 173 Index of cultivated Whether Grain index Emphasis of town land area there is risk Land Current state of government and Name of in Pollutant source and Selected area Proportio Content of heavy metals in soil management of public Town Area Output Proporti agricultural pollution pathway towns (ha.) n of land pollutant source participation (ha.) (ton) on (%) land and (%) willingness risk type Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for with rain which result in willingness of the 21.05%; 8 point locations with Cd content of pollution; the irrigation public in the area to 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 42.11%; 6 point water source, Xiangjiang participate in is not locations with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, River, is polluted; strong. accounting for 31.58%. excessive input of agricultural fertilizer pollutes agricultural land. Henglong Gypsum Ore Co., There are 13 point locations: among them, Ltd. was closed in there are 4 point locations with Cd content≦ 2008 and 0.3, accounting for 30.77%; 7 point locations Waste water and residue equipment inside with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting including annaline and The town the plant and slag for 53.85%; 1 point location with Cd content other factors discharged by government pays disposal pit have of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 7.69%; 0 Henglong Gypsum Ore great attention and Xiantang Cd and As been cleaned 5200 1508.5 29.01% 1165 0.18% point location with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, Co., Ltd. generated dust the public in the area √ Town pollution risk when the accounting for 0%. There is 1 point location and filter liquor through has strong enterprise was with As content ≤15mg/kg, accounting for exposure to wind and rain, willingness to closed; no residue 7.69%; 1 point locations with As content of thus flowing into and participate in is left, which 15-20mg/kg, accounting for 7.69%; 11 point polluting agricultural land. won’t generate locations with As content ≥20mg/kg, new heavy metal accounting for 84.62%. pollution on surrounded 174 Index of cultivated Whether Grain index Emphasis of town land area there is risk Land Current state of government and Name of in Pollutant source and Selected area Proportio Content of heavy metals in soil management of public Town Area Output Proporti agricultural pollution pathway towns (ha.) n of land pollutant source participation (ha.) (ton) on (%) land and (%) willingness risk type agricultural land. There are 19 point locations: among them, there is 1 point locations with Cd content≦ Catastrophic flood in 2006 0.3, accounting for 5.27%; 10 point locations and 2007 resulted in with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting The town flow-backward of Leishui for 52.63%; 2 point locations with Cd content government pays River, which brought No related of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 10.53%; 6 great attention and Xiangshi Cd and As massive sludge and management 7680 2562.4 33.36% 23925 3.79% point locations with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, the public in the area Township pollution risk pollutants and polluted measure accounting for 31.57%. There are 5 point has strong agricultural land; temporarily. locations with As content ≤15mg/kg, willingness to excessive agricultural accounting for 26.32%; 4 point locations with participate in fertilizer inputs pollutes As content of 15-20mg/kg, accounting for agricultural land. 21.05%; 10 point locations with As content ≥20mg/kg, accounting for 52.63%. There are 4 point locations: among them, there The coal ore, smelting The town is 0 point location with Cd content≦0.3, plant and fish feed with Coal ore was government pays accounting for 0%; 2 point locations with Cd heavy metals seriously closed in 1998 great attention, but Zhoushi content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 50%; Cd pollution exceeding standards 9900 2933.5 29.63% 32005 5.06% and smelting willingness of the Township 2 point locations with Cd content of risk pollutes irrigation water plant was closed public in the area to 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 50%; 0 point source; excessive in 2012. participate in is not location with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, agricultural fertilizer input strong. accounting for 0%. pollutes agricultural land. Songjiang 12900 3313.6 25.69% 5218 0.82% There are 2 point locations: among them, there Cd pollution Discharge of “three Some enterprises The town 175 Index of cultivated Whether Grain index Emphasis of town land area there is risk Land Current state of government and Name of in Pollutant source and Selected area Proportio Content of heavy metals in soil management of public Town Area Output Proporti agricultural pollution pathway towns (ha.) n of land pollutant source participation (ha.) (ton) on (%) land and (%) willingness risk type Town is 0 point location with Cd content≦0.3, risk wastes” of Hengnan have been closed government pays accounting for 0%; 0 point location with Cd Longtai Smelting Plant, in 2011 and 2016 great attention and content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 0%; 0 Hengnan Chunxiang Zinc the public in the area point location with Cd content of Co., Ltd., Hengnan Dingli has strong 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 0%; 2 point Lead Co., Ltd., Hengnan willingness to locations with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, Honghui Zinc Co., Ltd., participate in accounting for 100%. Hengnan Zhushun Chemicals Co., Ltd. and Hengyang Longfeng Smelting Co., Ltd.; dust and filter liquor of slag disposal pit and tailings dam generated from exposure to wind and rain flow into and pollute agricultural land. There are 3 point locations: among them, there Discharge of “three The town is 0 point location with Cd content≦0.3, wastes” of tungsten ore government pays accounting for 0%; 1 point location with Cd results in pollution of Tungsten ore has great attention and Chuankou Cd and As 14000 650.5 4.65% 6319.5 1.00% content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for irrigation water source; been closed in the public in the area Office pollution risk 33.33%; 2 point locations with Cd content of slag accumulation heavy 2011. has strong 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 66.67%; 0 point metal liquid flows into and willingness to location with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, pollute agricultural land participate in 176 Index of cultivated Whether Grain index Emphasis of town land area there is risk Land Current state of government and Name of in Pollutant source and Selected area Proportio Content of heavy metals in soil management of public Town Area Output Proporti agricultural pollution pathway towns (ha.) n of land pollutant source participation (ha.) (ton) on (%) land and (%) willingness risk type accounting for 0%. There is 1 point location with rain; excessive with As content ≤15mg/kg, accounting for agricultural fertilizer 33.33%; 0 point location with As content of pollutes agricultural land. 15-20mg/kg, accounting for 0%; 2 point locations with As content ≥20mg/kg, accounting for 66.67%. Local government has strengthened The pollutant source may prevention and be high background value control on There are 11 point locations: among them, of heavy metal in soil agricultural The town there is 0 point location with Cd content≦0.3, resulted from soil parent surface source government pays accounting for 0%; 3 point locations with Cd material; in addition, Qishan pollution. great attention and content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for Cd pollution cadmium containing Sub-district 6870 112.8 1.64% 718.3 0.11% Popularize low the public in the area √ 27.27%; 3 point locations with Cd content of risk phosphate fertilizer is Office toxic and residue has strong 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 27.27%; 5 point applied unreasonably for pesticide and willingness to locations with Cd content ≥0.9mg/kg, many years, so heavy develop green participate in accounting for 45.46%. metal is enriched in soil, prevention and resulting into historical control and left pollution unified control on pests in crops. 177 Table 7-9 Selection Sheet of Project Towns of Yizhang County Index of scope Index of Contamination index of polluted agricultural of agricultural Grain index Management of pollutant source agricultural land area products land Total Propor Land Irrigatio annual Proporti Select Name of Conta tion in Involve Annual Qualifi area n water Sampl Conta Main pollutant source qualifie on of ed town Propor Polluted minate grain d discharg ed Closed (ha.) system e minatio Outp d qualified towns Area tion of agricultu Propo d output enterpr e amount enterp enterpri quanti n ut dischar discharg (ha.) occupi ral land rtion quanti of the ise of wastes rise se ty proport (ton) ge e in total es land area (ha.) ty whole quantit (10,000 quantit quantity (piece) ion (%) amount discharg (piece) county( y tons) y (10,000 e amount %) tons) Upstream nonferrous metal mining and mineral Meitian 13700 Wushui 1823.2 13.35% 1458.56 80% 32 15 46.88% 7051 processing enterprise; 8 1 1 7 1 100% √ Town agricultural surface source pollution Upstream nonferrous metal mining and mineral Jiangshui 8550 Wushui 1842.27 21.50% 1658.043 90% 11 5 45.45% 6907 processing enterprise; 8 1 1 7 1 100% Township agricultural surface source pollution Upstream and local Chishi Yuxi 8650 1416.93 16.30% 1133.544 80% / / / / / nonferrous metal mining and 15 2 2 13 2 100% Township River mineral processing enterprises Yanquan Upstream and local small 7200 Leshui 1403.87 19.45% 982.709 70% / / / / / 5 5 / 100% Town tannery Yaogangx Yuxi Nonferrous metal mining and 10190 703.33 6.80% 597.8305 85% / / / / / 8 2 2 6 2 100% ian Town River mineral processing enterprises 178 Index of scope Index of Contamination index of polluted agricultural of agricultural Grain index Management of pollutant source agricultural land area products land Total Propor Land Irrigatio annual Proporti Select Name of Conta tion in Involve Annual Qualifi area n water Sampl Conta Main pollutant source qualifie on of ed town Propor Polluted minate grain d discharg ed Closed (ha.) system e minatio Outp d qualified towns Area tion of agricultu Propo d output enterpr e amount enterp enterpri quanti n ut dischar discharg (ha.) occupi ral land rtion quanti of the ise of wastes rise se ty proport (ton) ge e in total es land area (ha.) ty whole quantit (10,000 quantit quantity (piece) ion (%) amount discharg (piece) county( y tons) y (10,000 e amount %) tons) Upstream nonferrous metal Wuling Zhangshu 14679 1899.67 12.90% 1519.736 80% 84 27 32.14% 4027 mining and mineral 4 / / 4 / 100% √ Town i processing enterprises Guanxi 5540 876.13 15.80% 744.7105 85% 9 3 33.33% 2408 Coal mine 5 / / 5 / 100% Township Tiantang 15522 Leshui 2578 16.60% 1804.6 70% 5 0 0 Tannery and pig farm / / 100% Town Upstream nonferrous metal mining and mineral Baishidu Yuxi 5800 302.2 5.20% 241.76 80% / / / / / processing enterprise; 0 / / 0 100% Town River agricultural surface source pollution Upstream nonferrous metal Yingchun 7500 Wushui 1280.47 17% 832.3055 65% / / / / / mining and mineral 0 / / 0 100% Town processing enterprise; Upstream nonferrous metal Yangmeis Yuxi 11845 1339 11.30% 1071.2 80% / / / / / mining and mineral 2 / / 2 / 100% han Town River processing enterprise; Liyuan Upstream and local small 7200 Leshui 1342.47 18.60% 939.729 70% / / / / / / / 100% Town paper plants; agricultural 179 Index of scope Index of Contamination index of polluted agricultural of agricultural Grain index Management of pollutant source agricultural land area products land Total Propor Land Irrigatio annual Proporti Select Name of Conta tion in Involve Annual Qualifi area n water Sampl Conta Main pollutant source qualifie on of ed town Propor Polluted minate grain d discharg ed Closed (ha.) system e minatio Outp d qualified towns Area tion of agricultu Propo d output enterpr e amount enterp enterpri quanti n ut dischar discharg (ha.) occupi ral land rtion quanti of the ise of wastes rise se ty proport (ton) ge e in total es land area (ha.) ty whole quantit (10,000 quantit quantity (piece) ion (%) amount discharg (piece) county( y tons) y (10,000 e amount %) tons) surface source pollution Mangshan Yao 24800 Leshui 325.6 1.30% 0 0 / / / / / None 0 / / Township Yiliu Upstream and local small 8600 Leshui 1747.53 20.30% 1398.024 80% 8 8 100% 100% 5 / / 5 / 100% √ Town paper plants Changcun Upstream and local small 5900 Leshui 1075.87 18.25% / / / / / 2 / / 2 100% Township paper plants Upstream nonferrous metal Litian Yuxi 7600 1661.13 21.80% 1328.904 80% / / / / / mining and mineral 2 / / 2 / 100% Town River processing enterprise; Huangsha 10100 Leshui 1377.6 13.60% 964.32 70% / / / / / Leather factory 6 / / 6 / 100% Town Bali Town 14124 Leshui 2284 16.20% 1598.8 70% / / / / / Leather factory 20 / / 20 / 100% Upstream nonferrous metal Yuxi 27860 Yuxi 2092.73 7.50% 1569.5475 75% / / / / / mining and mineral 3 / / 3 / 100% Town processing enterprise; 180 Table 7-10 Selection Sheet of Project Towns of Linwu County Index of agricultural land Grain index area Cont Conta Emphasis of town Sele Name of Proportio amin minat Current state of management of government and cted No. Analysis of pollutant source Town Paddy field n of Output Propo ated ed pollutant source public participation tow area (ha.) occupies (ton) rtion rice factor willingness ns land The town government pays little attention and Shunfeng No data No collected materials No collected materials and related 1 1279.06 12.24% 8433 9.41% willingness of the Town temporarily temporarily management measures. public in the area to participate in is not strong The town government pays little attention and Jinjiang No data No collected materials No collected materials and related 2 644.83 12.89% 3358.2 3.75% willingness of the Town temporarily temporarily management measures. public in the area to participate in is not strong The town There is no enterprise with government pays heavy metal pollution inside the great attention and Wushui 16.44 town; pollutant source may be No collected materials and related 3 1676.87 17.42% 14736.7 Yes Cd, As the public in the area √ Town % high background value of heavy management measures. has strong metal in soil and agricultural willingness to inputs pollution. participate in There is no enterprise with The town heavy metal pollution inside the government pays Nanqiang 13141.0 14.66 No collected materials and related 4 1705.08 9.79% Yes Cd, As town; pollutant source may be great attention and √ Town 7 % management measures. high background value of heavy the public in the area metal in soil and agricultural has strong 181 Index of agricultural land Grain index area Cont Conta Emphasis of town Sele Name of Proportio amin minat Current state of management of government and cted No. Analysis of pollutant source Town Paddy field n of Output Propo ated ed pollutant source public participation tow area (ha.) occupies (ton) rtion rice factor willingness ns land inputs pollution. willingness to participate in The town Iron and manganese ore was closed government pays at the end of 1990s. Historical iron little attention and Fenshi 10033.2 11.19 Large iron and manganese ore and manganese ore residues have 5 1259.89 11.86% Yes Cd, As willingness of the Town 3 % was exploited in the 1990s been cleaned, which won’t result in public in the area to new heavy metal pollution to participate in is not downstream agricultural land. strong The town Manganese ore and coal ore have Small workshop of open government pays been closed; but there are arsenic exploration of manganese ore, great attention and Shuidong residue treatment and recycling 6 749.89 6.83% 4392 4.90% Yes Cd, As and coal oreexploited in an open the public in the area Town enterprises, which may result in way; residues are piled in an has strong new heavy metal pollution to the exposed way; willingness to downstream agricultural land. participate in The town The main pollutant source is government pays waste water, residue, ore residue little attention and Chujiang and dust of small workshop of No collected materials and related 7 1001.68 13.19% 6819 7.61% Yes Cd, As willingness of the Town open exploration of manganese management measures. public in the area to ore, iron ore and coal ore in participate in is not 1960s-1970s. strong The town government pays Maishi No data No collected materials No collected materials and related 8 1099.33 14.00% 5131 5.72% little attention and Town temporarily temporarily management measures. willingness of the public in the area to 182 Index of agricultural land Grain index area Cont Conta Emphasis of town Sele Name of Proportio amin minat Current state of management of government and cted No. Analysis of pollutant source Town Paddy field n of Output Propo ated ed pollutant source public participation tow area (ha.) occupies (ton) rtion rice factor willingness ns land participate in is not strong The town government pays little attention and Xianghua No collected materials No collected materials and related 9 607.23 7.84% 2878 3.21% Yes Cd, As willingness of the Town temporarily management measures. public in the area to participate in is not strong The town government pays Huatang little attention and No collected materials No collected materials and related 10 Townshi 854.18 12.48% 7269 8.11% Yes Cd, As willingness of the temporarily management measures. p public in the area to participate in is not strong The town government pays little attention and Wanshui No collected materials No collected materials and related willingness of the 11 Townshi 904.32 14.99% 5571 6.21% Yes Cd, As temporarily management measures. public in the area to p participate in is not strong The town Zhennan No collected materials No collected materials and related government pays 12 Townshi 618.25 7.47% 3018 3.37% Yes Cd, As temporarily management measures. little attention and p willingness of the 183 Index of agricultural land Grain index area Cont Conta Emphasis of town Sele Name of Proportio amin minat Current state of management of government and cted No. Analysis of pollutant source Town Paddy field n of Output Propo ated ed pollutant source public participation tow area (ha.) occupies (ton) rtion rice factor willingness ns land public in the area to participate in is not strong The town government pays Xishan little attention and Yao No data No collected materials No collected materials and related 13 620.86 3.06% 4375 4.88% willingness of the Townshi temporarily temporarily management measures. public in the area to p participate in is not strong The town government pays little attention and No data No collected materials No collected materials and related 14 Others 492 0.55% willingness of the temporarily temporarily management measures. public in the area to participate in is not strong 100.00 No data Total 13021.5 9.47% 89647.2 % temporarily 184 Table 6-11 Selection Sheet of Project Towns of Lengshuitan District Index of agricultural participation willingness Emphasis of town government and public Index of rice output land area Propor Rankin 2016 Selected project town tion in Proportio g Ranking Whether there cultiva n of among of output is risk in Pollutant source Current state of Name of Paddy ted output on No. cultivat among Content of heavy metals in soil agricultural Content of heavy metals in rice and pollution management of pollutant Town field land total ed land total land and risk pathway source area area of Output output of area of output of type (ha.) the (ton) the the the whole district whole district district (%) district (%) There are 171 point locations: among them, there are 87 point There are 122 point locations Discharge of Huaqiao Smelting Plant, The town locations with Cd content ≦ 0.3, in total. Among them, there “three wastes” of Xiyanghong Smelting governm accounting for 50.88%; 83 point are 102 point location with Huaqiao Plant, Wuxing ent pays locations with Cd content of Cd content ＜ 0.2mg/kg, Smelting Plant, Antimony Product Plant great 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for accounting for 83.61%; 12 Xiyanghong and other enterprises attention 48.54%; 1 point location with Cd point locations with Cd Smelting Plant, involved in heavy metal and the content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, Cd and As Huaqiaoji content of 0.2-0.4mg/kg, Wuxing pollution have been public in 1 1247 3.84 10 16017 4.58 10 accounting for 0.58%. There are pollution e Town accounting for 9.84%; 5 Antimony closed in 2012. the area 38 point locations with As content risk point locations with Cd Product Plant Processing of residue of has ≤15mg/kg, accounting for content of 0.4-0.6mg/kg, and other Xiyanghong Smelting strong 22.22%; 67 point locations with accounting for 4.1%; 3 point enterprises Plant, Wuxing willingne As content of 15-20mg/kg, locations with Cd content＞ involved in Antimony Product Plant ss to accounting for 39.18%; 66 point 0.6mg/kg, accounting for heavy metal was completed in 2015, participat locations with As content of 2.45%. pollution. which has passed e in 20-30mg/kg, accounting for provincial acceptance. 38.6%. 185 Index of agricultural participation willingness Emphasis of town government and public Index of rice output land area Propor Rankin 2016 Selected project town tion in Proportio g Ranking Whether there cultiva n of among of output is risk in Pollutant source Current state of Name of Paddy ted output on No. cultivat among Content of heavy metals in soil agricultural Content of heavy metals in rice and pollution management of pollutant Town field land total ed land total land and risk pathway source area area of Output output of area of output of type (ha.) the (ton) the the the whole district whole district district (%) district (%) There are 319 point locations The town There are 429 point locations: in total. Among them, there governm among them, there are 71 point are 290 point location with ent pays locations with Cd content ≦ 0.3, Cd content ＜ 0.2mg/kg, great accounting for 16.55%; 301 point accounting for 90.9%; 16 attention locations with Cd content of point locations with Cd and it has Residues of slag 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for content of 0.2-0.4mg/kg, develope disposal pit of 70.16%; 52 point locations with accounting for 5.03%; 3 d VIP Puliqiao Cd content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, point locations with Cd Puliqiao manganese ore pilot on manganese ore accounting for 12.12%; 5 point Cd and As content of 0.4-0.6mg/kg, group has been closed treatment Puliqiao group are piled 2 3229 9.95 2 39813 11.39 2 locations with Cd content pollution accounting for 0.94%; 10 before 2008; coal ore of heavy √ Town in an exposed ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for 1.17%. risk point locations with Cd and silicon oxide ore metals; in way; historical There are 111 point locations with content ＞ 0.6mg/kg, have been closed. addition, left pollution of As content ＜ 15mg/kg, accounting for 3.13%. There the coal ore and accounting for 25.87%; 116 point are 306 point location with public in silicon oxide ore. locations with As content of As content ＜ 0.2mg/kg, the area 15-20mg/kg, accounting for accounting for 95.92%; 12 has 27.04%; 66 point locations with point locations with As strong As content ＞ 30mg/kg, content of 0.2-0.4mg/kg, willingne accounting for 34.5%. accounting for 3.77%; 1 ss to point location with As participat 186 Index of agricultural participation willingness Emphasis of town government and public Index of rice output land area Propor Rankin 2016 Selected project town tion in Proportio g Ranking Whether there cultiva n of among of output is risk in Pollutant source Current state of Name of Paddy ted output on No. cultivat among Content of heavy metals in soil agricultural Content of heavy metals in rice and pollution management of pollutant Town field land total ed land total land and risk pathway source area area of Output output of area of output of type (ha.) the (ton) the the the whole district whole district district (%) district (%) content of 0.4-0.6mg/kg, e in accounting for 0.31%. There are 269 point locations: There are 207 point locations The town Residues of slag among them, there are 30 point in total. Among them, there governm disposal pit of locations with Cd content ≦ 0.3, are 161 point location with ent pays Niujiaoba accounting for 11.15%; 199 point Cd content ＜ 0.2mg/kg, great manganese ore Niujiaoba manganese locations with Cd content of accounting for 77.78%; 36 attention group are piled ore group has been 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for point locations with Cd and it has Cd and As in an exposed closed before 2008; Niujiaoba 73.98%; 36 point locations with content of 0.2-0.4mg/kg, develope 3 1876 5.78 7 24098 6.89 6 pollution way; historical Huojian Coal Ore, √ Town Cd content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, accounting for 17.39%; 2 d VIP risk left pollution of Hongqi Coal Ore and accounting for 13.38%; 4 point point locations with Cd pilot on Huojian Coal Lingling Coal Ore have locations with Cd content content of 0.4-0.6mg/kg, treatment Ore, Hongqi been closed. ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for 1.49%. accounting for 0.97%; 8 of heavy Coal Ore and There are 98 point locations with point locations with Cd metals; in Lingling Coal As content ＜ 15mg/kg, content ＞ 0.6mg/kg, addition, Ore. accounting for 36.43%; 95 point accounting for 3.86%. There the 187 Index of agricultural participation willingness Emphasis of town government and public Index of rice output land area Propor Rankin 2016 Selected project town tion in Proportio g Ranking Whether there cultiva n of among of output is risk in Pollutant source Current state of Name of Paddy ted output on No. cultivat among Content of heavy metals in soil agricultural Content of heavy metals in rice and pollution management of pollutant Town field land total ed land total land and risk pathway source area area of Output output of area of output of type (ha.) the (ton) the the the whole district whole district district (%) district (%) locations with As content of are 206 point location with public in 15-20mg/kg, accounting for As content ＜ 0.2mg/kg, the area 35.32%; 34 point locations with accounting for 99.52%; 1 has As content of 20-30mg/kg, point location with As strong accounting for 12.64%; 42 point content of 0.2-0.4mg/kg, willingne locations with As content ＞ accounting for 0.48%. ss to 30mg/kg, accounting for 15.61%. participat e in There are 174 point locations: There are 129 point locations Discharge of The town Yongzhou Dongxing among them, there are 16 point in total. Among them, there “three wastes” of governm Mining Co., Ltd., locations with Cd content ≦ 0.3, are 68 point location with Cd Yongzhou ent pays Yongzhou Hongye accounting for 9.2%; 62 point content ＜ 0.2mg/kg, Dongxing great Smelting Co., Ltd., locations with Cd content of accounting for 52.71%; 17 Mining Co., Ltd., attention Tangquan Smelting 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for Cd and As point locations with Cd Yongzhou and the Gaoxishi Plant, Xiaofeng 4 1955 5.78 6 21173 6.06 8 35.63%; 53 point locations with pollution content of 0.2-0.4mg/kg, Hongye Smelting public in Town Smelting Plant and Cd content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, risk accounting for 13.18%; 14 Co., Ltd., the area other enterprises accounting for 30.46%; 43 point point locations with Cd Tangquan has involved in heavy metal locations with Cd content content of 0.4-0.6mg/kg, Smelting Plant, strong pollution have been ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for accounting for 10.85%; 30 Xiaofeng willingne closed before 24.71%. There are 50 point point locations with Cd Smelting Plant ss to September 2017. locations with As content ＜ content ＞ 0.6mg/kg, and other participat 188 Index of agricultural participation willingness Emphasis of town government and public Index of rice output land area Propor Rankin 2016 Selected project town tion in Proportio g Ranking Whether there cultiva n of among of output is risk in Pollutant source Current state of Name of Paddy ted output on No. cultivat among Content of heavy metals in soil agricultural Content of heavy metals in rice and pollution management of pollutant Town field land total ed land total land and risk pathway source area area of Output output of area of output of type (ha.) the (ton) the the the whole district whole district district (%) district (%) 15mg/kg, accounting for 28.74%; accounting for 23.26%. enterprises with e in 33 point locations with As content heavy metal of 15-20mg/kg, accounting for pollution. 18.96%; 50 point locations with As content of 20-30mg/kg, accounting for 28.74%; 41 point locations with As content ＞ 30mg/kg, accounting for 23.56%. There are 243 point positions: The town among them, there are 40 point governm Residues of slag locations with Cd content ≦ 0.3, Huangyangsi ent pays There are 178 point locations disposal pit of accounting for 16.46%; 171 point manganese ore group great in total. Among them, there Huangyangsi locations with Cd content of has been closed before attention are 163 point location with manganese ore Huangya 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for Cd and As 2008. Governance of and the Cd content ＜ 0.2mg/kg, group are piled 5 ngsi 3080 9.49 3 37976 10.86 3 70.37%; 25 point locations with pollution left residues of Lantian public in accounting for 91.58%; 15 in an exposed Town Cd content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, risk Chemical Plant was the area point locations with Cd way; discharge accounting for 10.29%; 7 point completed in 2015 and has content of 0.2-0.4mg/kg, of “three wastes” locations with Cd content it has passed provincial strong accounting for 8.42%. of Lantian ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for 2.88%. acceptance. willingne Chemical Plant. There are 93 point locations with ss to As content ＜ 15mg/kg, participat 189 Index of agricultural participation willingness Emphasis of town government and public Index of rice output land area Propor Rankin 2016 Selected project town tion in Proportio g Ranking Whether there cultiva n of among of output is risk in Pollutant source Current state of Name of Paddy ted output on No. cultivat among Content of heavy metals in soil agricultural Content of heavy metals in rice and pollution management of pollutant Town field land total ed land total land and risk pathway source area area of Output output of area of output of type (ha.) the (ton) the the the whole district whole district district (%) district (%) accounting for 38.27%; 88 point e in locations with As content of 15-20mg/kg, accounting for 36.21%; 37 point locations with As content of 20-30mg/kg, accounting for 15.23%; 25 point locations with As content ＞ 30mg/kg, accounting for 10.29%. There are 567 point positions: There are 420 point locations Discharge of Li Xiangyang Copper The town among them, there are 79 point in total. Among them, there “three wastes” of Sulphate Plant and governm locations with Cd content ≦ 0.3, are 283 point location with Li Xiangyang Yongzhou Tianyuan ent pays accounting for 13.93%; 130 point Cd content ＜ 0.2mg/kg, Copper Sulphate Chemicals Co., Ltd. great locations with Cd content of accounting for 67.38%; 87 Plant, Yongzhou were closed before attention Shanglin 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for Cd and As point locations with Cd Tianyuan September 2017. and it has 6 gqiao 6151 18.96 3 75842 21.69 1 75.66%; 36 point locations with pollution content of 0.2-0.4mg/kg, Chemicals Co., Governance of left develope √ Town Cd content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, risk accounting for 20.71%; 26 Ltd., Yongzhou residues of Li d VIP accounting for 6.35%; 23 point point locations with Cd Xiangsheng Xiangyang Copper pilot on locations with Cd content content of 0.4-0.6mg/kg, Smelting Co., Sulphate Plant and treatment ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for 4.06%. accounting for 3.81%; 34 Ltd., Jinli Yongzhou Tianyuan of heavy There are 206 point locations with point locations with Cd Smelting Plant, Chemicals Co., Ltd. has metals; in As content ＜ 15mg/kg, content ＞ 0.6mg/kg, Jiepai been completed in 2015 addition, 190 Index of agricultural participation willingness Emphasis of town government and public Index of rice output land area Propor Rankin 2016 Selected project town tion in Proportio g Ranking Whether there cultiva n of among of output is risk in Pollutant source Current state of Name of Paddy ted output on No. cultivat among Content of heavy metals in soil agricultural Content of heavy metals in rice and pollution management of pollutant Town field land total ed land total land and risk pathway source area area of Output output of area of output of type (ha.) the (ton) the the the whole district whole district district (%) district (%) accounting for 36.33%; 88 point accounting for 8.1%. There Manganese and it has passed the locations with As content of are 403 point location with Residual provincial acceptance. public in 15-20mg/kg, accounting for As content ＜ 0.2mg/kg, Smelting Plant, Yongzhou Xiangsheng the area 15.52%; 153 point locations with accounting for 95.95%; 13 Wang Niansheng Smelting Co., Ltd., Jinli has As content of 20-30mg/kg, point locations with As Smelting Plant, Smelting Plant, Jiepai strong accounting for 26.99%; 78 point content of 0.2-0.4mg/kg, Yongfa Iron Manganese Residual willingne locations with As content ＞ accounting for 3.1%; 4 point Alloy Plant, Smelting Plant, Wang ss to 30mg/kg, accounting for 13.76%. locations with As content of Liu Dazhao Niansheng Smelting participat 0.4-0.6mg/kg, accounting for Smelting Plant Plant, Yongfa Iron e in 0.95%. There is no Pb, Hg or and other Alloy Plant, Liu other heavy metals. enterprises Dazhao Smelting Plant involved in and other enterprises heavy metal involved in heavy metal pollution. pollution before September 2017. 191 Index of agricultural participation willingness Emphasis of town government and public Index of rice output land area Propor Rankin 2016 Selected project town tion in Proportio g Ranking Whether there cultiva n of among of output is risk in Pollutant source Current state of Name of Paddy ted output on No. cultivat among Content of heavy metals in soil agricultural Content of heavy metals in rice and pollution management of pollutant Town field land total ed land total land and risk pathway source area area of Output output of area of output of type (ha.) the (ton) the the the whole district whole district district (%) district (%) There are 281 point positions: among them, there are 99 point locations with Cd content ≦ 0.3, There are 281 point locations accounting for 35.23%; 171 point in total. Among them, there The town locations with Cd content of are 133 point location with governm 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for There is no Cd content ＜ 0.2mg/kg, ent pays 60.85%; 10 point locations with enterprise with accounting for 47.33%; 61 great Cd content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, heavy metal point locations with Cd attention accounting for 3.36%; 1 point pollution in the content of 0.2-0.4mg/kg, and the location with Cd content Cd and As town; pollutant Yitang accounting for 21.71%; 28 No related management public in 7 2678 8.25 5 34400 9.84 4 ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for 0.36%. pollution source may be Town point locations with Cd measure temporarily. the area There are 92 point locations with risk high background content of 0.4-0.6mg/kg, has As content ＜ 15mg/kg, value of heavy accounting for 9.97%; 59 strong accounting for 32.74%; 121 point metals in soil and point locations with Cd willingne locations with As content of agricultural content ＞ 0.6mg/kg, ss to 15-20mg/kg, accounting for inputs pollution. accounting for 20.99%. participat 43.06%; 67 point locations with There is no As, Pb, Hg or e in As content of 20-30mg/kg, other heavy metals. accounting for 23.84%; 1 point location with As content ＞ 30mg/kg, accounting for 0.36%. 192 Index of agricultural participation willingness Emphasis of town government and public Index of rice output land area Propor Rankin 2016 Selected project town tion in Proportio g Ranking Whether there cultiva n of among of output is risk in Pollutant source Current state of Name of Paddy ted output on No. cultivat among Content of heavy metals in soil agricultural Content of heavy metals in rice and pollution management of pollutant Town field land total ed land total land and risk pathway source area area of Output output of area of output of type (ha.) the (ton) the the the whole district whole district district (%) district (%) There are 141 point positions: among them, there are 22 point Discharge of locations with Cd content ≦ 0.3, “three wastes” of accounting for 15.6%; 105 point Guo Baohua The town locations with Cd content of Smelting Plant, governm 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for There are 105 point locations Lengshuitan Guo Baohua Smelting ent pays 74.47%; 12 point locations with in total. Among them, there District Yongzhi Plant, Lengshuitan great Cd content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, are 104 point location with Smelting Plant District Yongzhi attention accounting for 8.51%; 2 point Cd content ＜ 0.2mg/kg, and other Smelting Plant and and the locations with Cd content Cd and As Caishi accounting for 99.05%; 1 enterprises other enterprises public in 8 1583 4.88 9 19518 5.58 9 ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for 1.42%. pollution Town point location with Cd involved in involved in heavy metal the area There are 44 point locations with risk content of 0.2-0.4mg/kg, heavy metal pollution and Qishantou has As content ＜ 15mg/kg, accounting for 0.95%. There pollution; manganese ore have strong accounting for 31.2%; 56 point is no As, Pb, Hg or other residues of slag been closed before willingne locations with As content of heavy metals. disposal pit of 2008. ss to 15-20mg/kg, accounting for Qishantou participat 39.72%; 30 point locations with manganese ore e in As content of 20-30mg/kg, are piled in an accounting for 21.28%; 11 point exposed way. locations with As content ＞ 30mg/kg, accounting for 7.8%. 193 Index of agricultural participation willingness Emphasis of town government and public Index of rice output land area Propor Rankin 2016 Selected project town tion in Proportio g Ranking Whether there cultiva n of among of output is risk in Pollutant source Current state of Name of Paddy ted output on No. cultivat among Content of heavy metals in soil agricultural Content of heavy metals in rice and pollution management of pollutant Town field land total ed land total land and risk pathway source area area of Output output of area of output of type (ha.) the (ton) the the the whole district whole district district (%) district (%) There are 97 point positions: among them, there are 5 point locations with Cd content ≦ 0.3, accounting for 5.16%; 87 point The town locations with Cd content of governm 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for There is no There are 71 point locations ent pays 89.69%; 4 point locations with Cd enterprise with in total. Among them, there little content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, heavy metal are 70 point location with Cd attention accounting for 4.12%; 1 point pollution in the content ＜ 0.2mg/kg, and Yangcun location with Cd content Cd and As town; pollutant accounting for 98.59%; 1 No related management willingne 9 dian 1032 3.18 11 13256 3.79 11 ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for 1.03%. pollution source may be point location with Cd measure temporarily. ss of the Township There are 30 point locations with risk high background content of 0.2-0.4mg/kg, public in As content ＜ 15mg/kg, value of heavy accounting for 1.41%. There the area accounting for 30.93%; 46 point metals in soil and is no As, Pb, Hg or other to locations with As content of agricultural heavy metals. participat 15-20mg/kg, accounting for inputs pollution. e in is not 47.42%; 20 point locations with strong As content of 20-30mg/kg, accounting for 20.62%; 1 point location with As content ＞ 30mg/kg, accounting for 1.03%. 194 Index of agricultural participation willingness Emphasis of town government and public Index of rice output land area Propor Rankin 2016 Selected project town tion in Proportio g Ranking Whether there cultiva n of among of output is risk in Pollutant source Current state of Name of Paddy ted output on No. cultivat among Content of heavy metals in soil agricultural Content of heavy metals in rice and pollution management of pollutant Town field land total ed land total land and risk pathway source area area of Output output of area of output of type (ha.) the (ton) the the the whole district whole district district (%) district (%) There are 268 point positions: among them, there are 43 point locations with Cd content ≦ 0.3, There are 196 point locations accounting for 46.04%; 218 point in total. Among them, there The town locations with Cd content of are 140 point location with Discharge of governm 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for Cd content ＜ 0.2mg/kg, “three wastes” of ent pays 81.35%; 6 point locations with Cd Yongzhou Xinhai accounting for 71.43%; 34 Yongzhou little content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, Smelting Co., Ltd., point locations with Cd Xinhai Smelting attention accounting for 2.24%; 1 point Long Tao Smelting content of 0.2-0.4mg/kg, Co., Ltd., Long and Quhe location with Cd content Cd and As Plant, Long Xiaolin accounting for 17.35%; 12 Tao Smelting willingne 10 Sub-distri 2771 8.54 4 34166 9.77 5 ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for 0.37%. pollution Smelting Plant and point locations with Cd Plant, Long ss of the ct There are 111 point locations with risk other enterprises with content of 0.4-0.6mg/kg, Xiaolin Smelting public in As content ＜ 15mg/kg, heavy metal pollution accounting for 6.12%; 10 Plant and other the area accounting for 41.42%; 111 point have been closed before point locations with Cd enterprises with to locations with As content of September 2017. content ＞ 0.6mg/kg, heavy metal participat 15-20mg/kg, accounting for accounting for 5.1%. There pollution. e in is not 41.42%; 43 point locations with is no As, Pb, Hg or other strong As content of 20-30mg/kg, heavy metals. accounting for 16.04%; 3 point locations with As content ＞ 30mg/kg, accounting for 1.12%. 195 Index of agricultural participation willingness Emphasis of town government and public Index of rice output land area Propor Rankin 2016 Selected project town tion in Proportio g Ranking Whether there cultiva n of among of output is risk in Pollutant source Current state of Name of Paddy ted output on No. cultivat among Content of heavy metals in soil agricultural Content of heavy metals in rice and pollution management of pollutant Town field land total ed land total land and risk pathway source area area of Output output of area of output of type (ha.) the (ton) the the the whole district whole district district (%) district (%) There are 223 point positions: among them, there are 50 point locations with Cd content ≦ 0.3, accounting for 22.42%; 162 point The town locations with Cd content of governm 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for There are 160 point locations ent pays 72.64%; 8 point locations with Cd in total. Among them, there great content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, Residues of slag are 149 point location with attention accounting for3.59%; 3 point disposal pit of Yangjiaqi Cd content ＜ 0.2mg/kg, Renwan Town and the locations with Cd content Cd and As Renwan Town ao accounting for 93.12%; 11 manganese ore group public in 11 1836 5.66 8 22638 6.47 7 ≥0.9mg/kg, accounting for 1.35%. pollution manganese ore Sub-distri point locations with Cd has been closed before the area There are 85 point locations with risk group are piled ct content of 0.2-0.4mg/kg, 2008. has As content ＜ 15mg/kg, in an exposed accounting for 6.88%. There strong accounting for 38.12%; 81 point way. is no As, Pb, Hg or other willingne locations with As content of heavy metals. ss to 15-20mg/kg, accounting for participat 36.32%; 56 point locations with e in As content of 20-30mg/kg, accounting for 25.11%; 1 point location with As content ＞ 30mg/kg, accounting for 0.45%. 196 Index of agricultural participation willingness Emphasis of town government and public Index of rice output land area Propor Rankin 2016 Selected project town tion in Proportio g Ranking Whether there cultiva n of among of output is risk in Pollutant source Current state of Name of Paddy ted output on No. cultivat among Content of heavy metals in soil agricultural Content of heavy metals in rice and pollution management of pollutant Town field land total ed land total land and risk pathway source area area of Output output of area of output of type (ha.) the (ton) the the the whole district whole district district (%) district (%) There are 58 point positions: among them, there are 13 point The town locations with Cd content ≦ 0.3, governm accounting for 22.41%; 43 point There are 42 point locations ent pays locations with Cd content of in total. Among them, there Residues of slag great 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting are 31 point location with Cd disposal pit of attention for74.14%; 2 point locations with content ＜ 0.2mg/kg, Shanhu Shanhu Township and the Shanhu Cd content of 0.6-0.9mg/kg, Cd and As accounting for 73.81%; 11 Township manganese ore group public in 12 Sub-distri 667 2.06 12 7223 2.07 12 accounting for 3.35%. There are pollution point locations with Cd manganese ore has been closed before the area ct 20 point locations with As content risk content of 0.2-0.4mg/kg, group are piled 2008. has ＜ 15mg/kg, accounting for accounting for 26.19%. in an exposed strong 34.48%; 29point locations with As There is no As, Pb, Hg or way. willingne content of 15-20mg/kg, other heavy metals. ss to accounting for 50%; 9 point participat locations with As content of e in 20-30mg/kg, accounting for 15.52%. 197 Index of agricultural participation willingness Emphasis of town government and public Index of rice output land area Propor Rankin 2016 Selected project town tion in Proportio g Ranking Whether there cultiva n of among of output is risk in Pollutant source Current state of Name of Paddy ted output on No. cultivat among Content of heavy metals in soil agricultural Content of heavy metals in rice and pollution management of pollutant Town field land total ed land total land and risk pathway source area area of Output output of area of output of type (ha.) the (ton) the the the whole district whole district district (%) district (%) The town There are 34 point positions: governm among them, there are 16 point ent pays There are 25 point locations Maping locations with Cd content≦0.3, There are small great in total. Among them, there Agricultu accounting for 22.41%; 18 point smelting attention are 19 point location with Cd ral locations with Cd content of enterprises in the and the Cd and As content ＜ 0.2mg/kg, Economi 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for scope of town, No related management public in 13 288 0.89 13 3551 1.02 13 pollution accounting for 76%; 6 point c 74.14%. There are 29 point and the pollutant measure temporarily. the area risk locations with Cd content of Develop locations with As content of source is the has 0.2-0.4mg/kg, accounting for ment 15-20mg/kg, accounting for 50%; discharge “three strong 24%. There is no As, Pb, Hg Zone 9 point locations with As content wastes”. willingne or other heavy metals. of 20-30mg/kg, accounting for ss to 15.52%. participat e in Total 28393 349671 The selection of demonstration area shall take pollutant source caused by mineral enterprises with emphasis with reference to selection principle of demonstration area; evaluation index of setting and selection include: paddy field area, grain output and contamination of cultivated land, pollutant source, pollution pathways, management state of pollutant source and participation willingness of town governments. Thus, Puliqiao Town, Niujiaoba Town and Shangliangqiao Town are selected as the project towns through evaluation and selection. 198 Table 7-12 Selection Sheet of Project Towns of Qiyang County Index of Emph Grain Rice contamination agricultural Heavy metal pollution in soil in agricultural land asis of index index land area town Land govern Select Paddy field area (ha.) area Main pollutant Current state of ment ed Sample quantity Pollution factor quantity (piece) Cultivated land Proportion (%) Contaminated Contaminated Name of Proportion of occupies land management of pollutant and proje proportion (square source and its area (ha.) Town Output (piece) public ct (ton) kilometer pollution pathway source Pollution state Pollution type s) partici town pation willing ness The Qiyang Guanyintan Town Discharge of “three town Papermaking Plant has wastes” of Hunan govern been closed in 2012; Qiyang Huaxiang ment There are 91 points in total; among them, there Hunan Qiyang Huaxiang Smelting Group Co., pays are 3 points with Cd content<0.3mg/kg, Cd, As Smelting Group Co., Ltd. Ltd., Qiyang attentio accounting for 3.30%; 57 points with Cd pollution. and Qiyang Licheng Licheng Smelting n and content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for Cd exceeds Cd: Smelting Co., Ltd. were Co., Ltd., Qiyang the Guanyinta 62.64%; 31 points with Cd content>0.6mg/kg, standard by Cd, Cd: 2 20.00% closed in 2013 while some 81.18 2069 1969 3.9% 22783 4.37 10 Guanyintan Town public n Town accounting for 34.07%. There are 39 points with 89.01% and As As As: 1 As: residues are not cleared Papermaking Plant, in the As content <20mg/kg, accounting for 42.85%; exceeds 10.0.% completely; Yongzhou Yongzhou Huaxin area 42 points with As content of 20-30mg/kg, standard by Huaxin Magnetic Material Magnetic Material has accounting for 46.15%; 2 points with As 46.15% Co., Ltd. was closed in Co., Ltd., strong content >30mg/kg, accounting for 10.99%. 2014 and Guanyintan Guanyintan Town willing Town Yongda Company Yongda Company ness to was stopped production for and other enterprises particip treatment in 2016. ate in 199 Index of Emph Grain Rice contamination agricultural Heavy metal pollution in soil in agricultural land asis of index index land area town Land govern Select Paddy field area (ha.) area Main pollutant Current state of ment ed Sample quantity Pollution factor quantity (piece) Cultivated land Proportion (%) Contaminated Contaminated Name of Proportion of occupies land management of pollutant and proje proportion (square source and its area (ha.) Town Output (piece) (ton) kilometer pollution pathway source public ct Pollution state Pollution type s) partici town pation willing ness The town govern ment There are 30 points in total; among them, there Small workshop type Manganese ore, iron ore pays Cd, As are 16 points with Cd content >0.6mg/kg, of exploitation of and coal ore have been attentio pollution. Cd accounting for 53.33%; 14 points with Cd manganese ore, iron closed and surrounded n and exceeds Cd: content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for ore and coal ore in areas are returned to forest; the Maozhu standard by Cd, Cd: 4 16.00% 92.05 1871 1698 3.3% 46.67%. There are 8 points with As content 22669 4.35 25 1960s-1970s; Maozhu Town Zhenhong public Town 93.33% and As As As: 4 As: <20mg/kg, accounting for 26.67%; 20 points exposed piling of Coking Plant has been in the exceeds 16.00% with As content of 20-30mg/kg, accounting for residue; discharge of closed in 2016; scope area standard by 66.67%; 2 points with As content >30mg/kg, waste water of scope livestock and poultry has 86% accounting for 6.67%. breeding breeding is closed. strong willing ness to particip ate in There are 5 points in total; among them, there Cd, As There is no The are 3 points with Cd content >0.6mg/kg, pollution. Cd enterprise with town No collected materials and Dazhongq accounting for 60%; 2 points with Cd content of exceeds heavy metal govern 138 3389 3195 6.3% 27752 5.32 No data temporarily related management iao Town 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 40%. There are 4 standard by pollution inside the ment measures. points with As content <20mg/kg, accounting 100% and As town; pollutant pays for 80%; 1 point with As content >30mg/kg, exceeds source may be high attentio 200 Index of Emph Grain Rice contamination agricultural Heavy metal pollution in soil in agricultural land asis of index index land area town Land govern Select Paddy field area (ha.) area Main pollutant Current state of ment ed Sample quantity Pollution factor quantity (piece) Cultivated land Proportion (%) Contaminated Contaminated Name of Proportion of occupies land management of pollutant and proje proportion (square source and its area (ha.) Town Output (piece) (ton) kilometer pollution pathway source public ct Pollution state Pollution type s) partici town pation willing ness accounting for 20%. standard by background value of n and 20% heavy metal in soil the and agricultural public inputs pollution. in the area has strong willing ness to particip ate in The town Jinxin Stove Material Plant govern Discharge of waste in Sankoutang Town, ment water of Jinxin Stove There are 12 points in total; among them, there Cd pollution, Qiyang County has been pays Material in Sankouta are 3 points with Cd content >0.6mg/kg, with over Cd: closed in 2014 and some attentio 61.8 2408 2205 4.3% 21435 4.11 8 Cd Cd: 4 Sankoutang Town, g Town accounting for 25%; 9 points with Cd content of standard rate 50% enterprises have reached n and Qiyang County; the 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 75%. of 100% standard; the pollutant the pollutant source may source may be agricultural public be agricultural input input. in the area has 201 Index of Emph Grain Rice contamination agricultural Heavy metal pollution in soil in agricultural land asis of index index land area town Land govern Select Paddy field area (ha.) area Main pollutant Current state of ment ed Sample quantity Pollution factor quantity (piece) Cultivated land Proportion (%) Contaminated Contaminated Name of Proportion of occupies land management of pollutant and proje proportion (square source and its area (ha.) Town Output (piece) (ton) kilometer pollution pathway source public ct Pollution state Pollution type s) partici town pation willing ness strong willing ness to particip ate in The Iron and manganese ore town has been closed at the end govern of 1990s. Historical iron ment Iron and manganese There are 67 points in total; among them, there and manganese mining pays ore of Dajiang Forest are 6 points with Cd content <0.3mg/kg, residue has been cleared great Cd pollution. was exploited in accounting for 8.950%; 47 points with Cd which won’t result in new attentio Over standard 1990s; discharge of content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for Cd: Cd: pollution of heavy metal n and rate of waste water of Xiaojia 70.14%; 14 points with Cd content >0.6mg/kg, Cd, 44 69.84% for downstream the 107.78 2976 2499 4.9% 64.18%; As 35808 6.87 63 Qiyang Xiaojia √ Town accounting for 20.90%. There are 39 points with As As: As: agricultural land basically. public exceeds Village Papermaking As content <20mg/kg, accounting for 58.20%; 12 19.05% Qiyang Xiaojia Village in the standard by Plant, Qiyang 20 points with As content of 20-30mg/kg, Papermaking Plant, area 20.16% Bamiao accounting for 29.85%; 8 points with As Qiyang Bamiao has Papermaking Plant content >30mg/kg, accounting for 11.94%. Papermaking Plant have strong and other enterprises been closed in 2011 and willing passed provincial ness to acceptance. particip ate in 202 Index of Emph Grain Rice contamination agricultural Heavy metal pollution in soil in agricultural land asis of index index land area town Land govern Select Paddy field area (ha.) area Main pollutant Current state of ment ed Sample quantity Pollution factor quantity (piece) Cultivated land Proportion (%) Contaminated Contaminated Name of Proportion of occupies land management of pollutant and proje proportion (square source and its area (ha.) Town Output (piece) (ton) kilometer pollution pathway source public ct Pollution state Pollution type s) partici town pation willing ness The town govern ment pays Cd, As There are 27 points in total; among them, there attentio pollution. Small workshop type are 18 points with Cd content <0.3mg/kg, n and Over standard Cd: of exploitation of Manganese ore, silicon ore accounting for 66.67%; 8 points with Cd Cd: the Babao rate of Cd, 20.00% manganese ore, and tin ore have been 199.2 2136 1891 3.7% content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 20696 3.97 23 21 public Town 33.33%; As As: silicon ore and tin closed; oil tea forest is 29.63%; 1 point with Cd content >0.6mg/kg, As: 6 in the As exceeds 11.00% ore; exposed piling planted in surrounded area accounting for 3.70%. There are 3 points with area standard by of residues. As content >30mg/kg, accounting for 11.11%. has 11.11% strong willing ness to particip ate in There are 31 points in total; among them, there Cd, As The main pollutant There was coal ore at The are 21 points with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, pollution. Cd Cd: source is waste upstream of Baishui River, town Cd: Baishui accounting for 67.74%; 8 points with Cd exceeds Cd, 91.31% water, residues and which was closed in 1996; govern 126.99 4059 3590 7.0% 42431 8.14 23 21 √ Town content <0.3mg/kg, accounting for 25.81%; 2 standard by As As: dusts generated by however, some residues ment As: 6 points with Cd content >0.6mg/kg, accounting 67.74% and As 26.09% small workshop type have not been completely pays for 6.45%. There are 26 points with As content exceeds of exploitation of cleared yet. great 203 Index of Emph Grain Rice contamination agricultural Heavy metal pollution in soil in agricultural land asis of index index land area town Land govern Select Paddy field area (ha.) area Main pollutant Current state of ment ed Sample quantity Pollution factor quantity (piece) Cultivated land Proportion (%) Contaminated Contaminated Name of Proportion of occupies land management of pollutant and proje proportion (square source and its area (ha.) Town Output (piece) (ton) kilometer pollution pathway source public ct Pollution state Pollution type s) partici town pation willing ness <20mg/kg, accounting for 83.87%; 3 points standard by manganese ore, iron attentio with As content of 20-30mg/kg, accounting for 9.68% ore and coal ore in n and 9.68%; 2 points with As content >30mg/kg, the 1960s-1970s. the accounting for 6.45%. public in the area has strong willing ness to particip ate in The town There are 4 points in total; among them, there Cd, As govern are 2 points with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, pollution. Cd ment accounting for 50%; 31 points with Cd exceeds No collected materials and pays Huangnita content >0.6mg/kg, accounting for 50%. There standard by No collected 70.59 2081 1601 3.1% 20170 3.87 No data temporarily related management attentio ng Town are 2 points with As content <20mg/kg, 75% and As materials temporarily measures. n and accounting for 50%; 1 point with As content of exceeds the 20-30mg/kg, accounting for 25%; 1 point with standard by public As content >30mg/kg, accounting for 25%. 50% in the area 204 Index of Emph Grain Rice contamination agricultural Heavy metal pollution in soil in agricultural land asis of index index land area town Land govern Select Paddy field area (ha.) area Main pollutant Current state of ment ed Sample quantity Pollution factor quantity (piece) Cultivated land Proportion (%) Contaminated Contaminated Name of Proportion of occupies land management of pollutant and proje proportion (square source and its area (ha.) Town Output (piece) (ton) kilometer pollution pathway source public ct Pollution state Pollution type s) partici town pation willing ness has strong willing ness to particip ate in The town govern ment pays Cd, As There are 5 points in total; 4 points with Cd attentio pollution. content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 80%; 1 n and Over standard No collected materials and Jinbaotan point with Cd content >0.6mg/kg, accounting No collected the 64.72 2315 2088 4.1% rate of 80% for 23555 4.52 No data temporarily related management g Town for 20%. There are 4 points with As content materials temporarily public Cd, and over measures. <20mg/kg, accounting for 80%; 1 point with As in the standard rate content of 20-30mg/kg, accounting for 20%. area of 20% for As has strong willing ness to particip 205 Index of Emph Grain Rice contamination agricultural Heavy metal pollution in soil in agricultural land asis of index index land area town Land govern Select Paddy field area (ha.) area Main pollutant Current state of ment ed Sample quantity Pollution factor quantity (piece) Cultivated land Proportion (%) Contaminated Contaminated Name of Proportion of occupies land management of pollutant and proje proportion (square source and its area (ha.) Town Output (piece) (ton) kilometer pollution pathway source public ct Pollution state Pollution type s) partici town pation willing ness ate in The town govern ment pays Discharge of “three attentio wastes” of Qiyang n and There are 15 points in total, whose Cd content is Cd pollution. Hongfeng Chemical Qiyang Hongfeng the Panshi in 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 100%. There Over standard Plant; there is large 128.34 2105 1925 3.8% 22860 4.38 No data temporarily Chemical Plant was closed public Town are 15 points with As content <20mg/kg, rate of 100% livestock farm near in 2014 in the accounting for 100%. for Cd water source which area discharges waste has water. strong willing ness to particip ate in 206 Index of Emph Grain Rice contamination agricultural Heavy metal pollution in soil in agricultural land asis of index index land area town Land govern Select Paddy field area (ha.) area Main pollutant Current state of ment ed Sample quantity Pollution factor quantity (piece) Cultivated land Proportion (%) Contaminated Contaminated Name of Proportion of occupies land management of pollutant and proje proportion (square source and its area (ha.) Town Output (piece) (ton) kilometer pollution pathway source public ct Pollution state Pollution type s) partici town pation willing ness The town govern ment pays Cd, As There are 5 points in total; among them, there attentio pollution. are 3 points with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, n and Over standard accounting for 60%; 2 points with Cd No collected materials and the Meixi rate of 100% No collected 63.39 1704 1334 2.6% content >0.6mg/kg, accounting for 40%. There 14766 2.83 No data temporarily related management public Town for Cd and materials temporarily are 4 points with As content <20mg/kg, measures. in the over standard accounting for 80%; 1 point with As content of area rate of 20% for 20-30mg/kg, accounting for 20%. has As strong willing ness to particip ate in There are 20 points in total; among them, There Cd, As The Waste water The are 5 points with Cd content >0.6mg/kg, pollution. town discharge of town Yangjiaot accounting for 25%; 20 points in total; among Over standard Cd, Cd: 5 govern Xinjiang Many papermaking plants govern 126.89 3503 3071 6.0% 38740 7.43 9 ang Town them, there are 15 points with Cd content of rate of 100% As As: 3 ment Papermaking Plant, have been closed ment 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 75%. There are 10 for Cd and pays Xuelihong pays points with As content <20mg/kg, accounting over standard attentio Papermaking Plant, attentio 207 Index of Emph Grain Rice contamination agricultural Heavy metal pollution in soil in agricultural land asis of index index land area town Land govern Select Paddy field area (ha.) area Main pollutant Current state of ment ed Sample quantity Pollution factor quantity (piece) Cultivated land Proportion (%) Contaminated Contaminated Name of Proportion of occupies land management of pollutant and proje proportion (square source and its area (ha.) Town Output (piece) (ton) kilometer pollution pathway source public ct Pollution state Pollution type s) partici town pation willing ness for 50%; 8 points with As content of rate of 35% for n and Jixiang Papermaking n and 20-30mg/kg, accounting for 40%; 2 points with As the Plant and other the As content >30mg/kg, accounting for 10%. public papermaking plants public in the in Yangjiaotang in the area has Town, Qiyang area strong County has willingn strong ess to willing particip ness to ate in particip ate in The town govern ment Cd pollution, pays There are 5 points in total; among them, there No collected materials and Xiamadu over standard No collected attentio 125.29 2574 2497 4.9% are 5 points with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, 31085 5.96 No data temporarily related management Town rate of 100% materials temporarily n and accounting for 100%. measures. for Cd the public in the area has 208 Index of Emph Grain Rice contamination agricultural Heavy metal pollution in soil in agricultural land asis of index index land area town Land govern Select Paddy field area (ha.) area Main pollutant Current state of ment ed Sample quantity Pollution factor quantity (piece) Cultivated land Proportion (%) Contaminated Contaminated Name of Proportion of occupies land management of pollutant and proje proportion (square source and its area (ha.) Town Output (piece) (ton) kilometer pollution pathway source public ct Pollution state Pollution type s) partici town pation willing ness strong willing ness to particip ate in The town govern ment pays attentio n and Cd pollution. There are 4 points in total; among them, there Waste water the Qiliqiao Over standard Qiliqiao Paper Mill was 108.3 2074 1847 3.6% are 3 points with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, 21915 4.2 No data temporarily discharge of Qiliqiao public Town rate of 75% for closed down in 2016. accounting for 100%. Paper Mill in the Cd area has strong willing ness to particip ate in 209 Index of Emph Grain Rice contamination agricultural Heavy metal pollution in soil in agricultural land asis of index index land area town Land govern Select Paddy field area (ha.) area Main pollutant Current state of ment ed Sample quantity Pollution factor quantity (piece) Cultivated land Proportion (%) Contaminated Contaminated Name of Proportion of occupies land management of pollutant and proje proportion (square source and its area (ha.) Town Output (piece) (ton) kilometer pollution pathway source public ct Pollution state Pollution type s) partici town pation willing ness The town govern ment pays Waste water attentio discharge of n and There are 4 points in total; among them, there is Cd pollution, Chongshan the Dacundia 1 point with Cd content<0.3mg/kg, accounting Over standard Papermaking plant has 92.73 2771 2635 5.2% 29155 5.59 No data temporarily Papermaking Plant public n Town for 25%; 3 points with Cd content of rate of 75% for been closed in 2011. in Dacundian Town; in the 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 75%. Cd other pollutant area sources are unclear has strong willing ness to particip ate in There are 102 points in total; among them, there Cd and As Discharge of “three Qiyang Jiangnan Trade The are 13 points with Cd content<0.3mg/kg, pollution, Cd: wastes” of Qiyang Co., Ltd. was closed in town Lijiaping accounting for 12.75%; 29 points with Cd Over standard Cd, Cd: 4 30.77% Jiangnan Trade Co., 2014 and Yongzhou govern 83.25 2482 2349 4.6% 24234 4.65 13 Town content>0.6mg/kg, accounting for 28.43%; 60 rate of 84.31% As As: 5 As: Ltd. and Yongzhou Feixiang Smelting Co., ment points with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, for Cd, and 38.46% Feixiang Smelting Ltd. was closed in 2013 pays accounting for 58.82%. There are 83 points with over standard Co., Ltd. and while some residues are attentio 210 Index of Emph Grain Rice contamination agricultural Heavy metal pollution in soil in agricultural land asis of index index land area town Land govern Select Paddy field area (ha.) area Main pollutant Current state of ment ed Sample quantity Pollution factor quantity (piece) Cultivated land Proportion (%) Contaminated Contaminated Name of Proportion of occupies land management of pollutant and proje proportion (square source and its area (ha.) Town Output (piece) (ton) kilometer pollution pathway source public ct Pollution state Pollution type s) partici town pation willing ness As content <20mg/kg, accounting for 81.37%; rate of 18.63% exposed piling of not completely cleared. n and 15 points with As content of 20-30mg/kg, for As residues. the accounting for 14.71%; 4 points with As public content >30mg/kg, accounting for 3.92%. in the area has strong willing ness to particip ate in The town Cd and As govern There are 4 points in total; among them, there is Waste water pollution. Cement Plant in ment 1 point with Cd content >0.6mg/kg, accounting discharge of Cement Over standard Wenmingpu Town, Qiyang pays for 25%; 3 points with Cd content of Plant in Wenmingpu Wenfushi rate of 100% County has been closed in attentio 61.29 1820 1715 3.4% 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 75%. There are 3 19406 3.72 No data temporarily Town, Qiyang Town for Cd and 2011; no other related n and points with As content <20mg/kg, accounting County; no other over standard governance measures the for 75%; 1 point with As content of collected related rate of 25% for collected. public 20-30mg/kg, accounting for 25%. materials. As in the area has 211 Index of Emph Grain Rice contamination agricultural Heavy metal pollution in soil in agricultural land asis of index index land area town Land govern Select Paddy field area (ha.) area Main pollutant Current state of ment ed Sample quantity Pollution factor quantity (piece) Cultivated land Proportion (%) Contaminated Contaminated Name of Proportion of occupies land management of pollutant and proje proportion (square source and its area (ha.) Town Output (piece) (ton) kilometer pollution pathway source public ct Pollution state Pollution type s) partici town pation willing ness strong willing ness to particip ate in The town govern ment pays attentio There are 4 points in total; among them, there is n and 1 point with Cd content <0.3mg/kg, accounting Cd pollution, No collected materials and the Wenming for 25%; 3 points with Cd content of over standard No collected 112.11 4008 3705 7.3% 35039 6.72 No data temporarily related management public pu Town 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 75%. There are 4 rate of 75% for materials temporarily measures. in the points with As content <20mg/kg, accounting Cd area for 100%. has strong willing ness to particip ate in 212 Index of Emph Grain Rice contamination agricultural Heavy metal pollution in soil in agricultural land asis of index index land area town Land govern Select Paddy field area (ha.) area Main pollutant Current state of ment ed Sample quantity Pollution factor quantity (piece) Cultivated land Proportion (%) Contaminated Contaminated Name of Proportion of occupies land management of pollutant and proje proportion (square source and its area (ha.) Town Output (piece) (ton) kilometer pollution pathway source public ct Pollution state Pollution type s) partici town pation willing ness The town govern ment pays There are 4 points in total; among them, there is Cd, As attentio 1 point with Cd content <0.3mg/kg, accounting pollution. n and for 25%; 2 points with Cd content of Over standard No collected materials and the Gongjiapi 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 50%; 1 point with No collected 79.98 2586 2353 4.6% rate of 75% for 26325 5.05 No data temporarily related management public ng Town Cd content>0.6mg/kg, accounting for 25%. materials temporarily Cd and over measures. in the There are 2 points with As content <20mg/kg, standard rate area accounting for 50%; 2 points with As content of of 25% for As has 20-30mg/kg, accounting for 50%. strong willing ness to particip ate in 213 Index of Emph Grain Rice contamination agricultural Heavy metal pollution in soil in agricultural land asis of index index land area town Land govern Select Paddy field area (ha.) area Main pollutant Current state of ment ed Sample quantity Pollution factor quantity (piece) Cultivated land Proportion (%) Contaminated Contaminated Name of Proportion of occupies land management of pollutant and proje proportion (square source and its area (ha.) Town Output (piece) (ton) kilometer pollution pathway source public ct Pollution state Pollution type s) partici town pation willing ness The town govern ment There are 12 points in total; among them, there Cd, As pays Discharge of “three are 2 points with Cd content <0.3mg/kg, pollution. attentio wastes” of Hunan accounting for 16.67%; 2 points with Cd Over standard Hunan Qiyang Huatian n and Qiyang Huatian content >0.6mg/kg, accounting for 16.67%; 8 rate of Smelting Co., Ltd. and the Changhon As: Smelting Co., Ltd., 36.1 899 794 1.6% points with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, 83.33%for Cd 9779 1.88 7 As As: 3 Qiyang Xiangqi Trade public g Office 42.86% Qiyang Xiangqi accounting for 66.67%. There are 8 points with and over Industry Co., Ltd. have in the Trade Industry Co., As content <20mg/kg, accounting for 75%; 4 standard rate been closed in 2016 area Ltd. and other iron points with As content of 20-30mg/kg, of 8.33% for has alloy plants. accounting for 25%. As strong willing ness to particip ate in There are 4 points in total; among them, there Cd and As Qiyang Nitrogen Fertilizer The Discharge of “three are 3 points with Cd content >0.6mg/kg, pollution. Plant and Qiyang Smelting town wastes” of Qiyang Longshan accounting for 75%; 1 point with Cd content of Over standard Plant are closed and the govern 39.9 617 577 1.1% 5302 1.02 No data temporarily Nitrogen Fertilizer Office 0.3-0.6mg/kg, accounting for 25%. There is 1 rate of 100% original site has been ment Plant and Qiyang point with As content of 20-30mg/kg, for Cd and developed as commercial pays Smelting Plant. accounting for 25%; 3 points with As content of over standard housing and affordable attentio 214 Index of Emph Grain Rice contamination agricultural Heavy metal pollution in soil in agricultural land asis of index index land area town Land govern Select Paddy field area (ha.) area Main pollutant Current state of ment ed Sample quantity Pollution factor quantity (piece) Cultivated land Proportion (%) Contaminated Contaminated Name of Proportion of occupies land management of pollutant and proje proportion (square source and its area (ha.) Town Output (piece) (ton) kilometer pollution pathway source public ct Pollution state Pollution type s) partici town pation willing ness <20mg/kg, accounting for 75%. rate of 25% for housing. n and As the public in the area has strong willing ness to particip ate in The town govern Cd, As There are 5 points in total; among them, there ment pollution.Over Waste water are 5 points with Cd content of 0.3-0.6mg/kg, pays standard rate discharge of Yuanfa Wuxi accounting for 100%. There are 2 points with As Papermaking Plant has attentio 33.2 579 543 1.1% of 100% for 5602 1.07 No data temporarily Papermaking Plant Office content of 20-30mg/kg, accounting for 40%; 3 been closed in 2011. n and Cd and over in Wuxi Town, points with As content <20mg/kg, accounting the standard rate Qiyang County for 60%. public of 40% for As in the area has 215 Index of Emph Grain Rice contamination agricultural Heavy metal pollution in soil in agricultural land asis of index index land area town Land govern Select Paddy field area (ha.) area Main pollutant Current state of ment ed Sample quantity Pollution factor quantity (piece) Cultivated land Proportion (%) Contaminated Contaminated Name of Proportion of occupies land management of pollutant and proje proportion (square source and its area (ha.) Town Output (piece) (ton) kilometer pollution pathway source public ct Pollution state Pollution type s) partici town pation willing ness strong willing ness to particip ate in The selection of demonstration area shall take pollutant source caused by mineral enterprises with emphasis with reference to selection principle of demonstration area; evaluation index of setting and selection include: paddy field area, grain output and contamination of cultivated land, pollutant source, pollution pathways, management state of pollutant source and participation willingness of town governments. Thus, Xiaojia Town and Baishui Town are selected as the project towns through evaluation and selection. 216 Appendix 8 Comparison and Selection Sheet of Demonstration Area of Each Project County Table 8-1 Sheet on Analysis of Site Selection of Baojing County Demonstration Area Main factors considered in Name and analysis of demonstration area comparing and selecting demonstration area Yanjing Demonstration Area Xiaba Demonstration Area Nadong Demonstration Area Zhongba Demonstration Area Hangsha Demonstration Area Yanjing Village, Ganxi Selected village in Nadong Village, Heping Zhongba Village, Shuitian Hangsha Village, Hangji Village, Datuo Village, Xiaba Village, Bize Village demonstration area Village Village Village Regional representativeness Mawang Village Area, ha. 144 63.34 40.67 48.33 74.33 Continuous concentrated area, 120 59 35.6 40 60 ha. Main type of Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field cultivated land Whether it is the Grain output is 605kg/year Grain output is 700 kg/year Grain output is 650 kg/year Grain output is 800kg/year Grain output is 680 kg/year main grain output per mu per mu per mu per mu per mu area Clear: Residues, slags and Clear: Residues, slags and Clear: Residues, slags and Whether the Clear: Residues, slags and Clear: Residues, slags and Pollutant source is clear and controllable waste water generated by waste water generated by waste water generated by reason for heavy waste water generated by waste water generated by beneficiation and private private mining of lead zinc private mining of vanadium metal pollution is private mining of lead zinc private mining of mercury ore mining of lead zinc ore ore and mercury ore pollute ore and vanadium smelting clear ore pollute soil pollute soil pollute soil soil by soil method pollute soil Private mining activity of Whether main Lead zinc ore beneficiation Exploitation time was in vanadium ore was pollutant source is Exploitation time was in Exploitation time was in plant was closed in 2008; 1970s-1980s with short continuously closed in 2004 controllable and 1990s in small scope which 1950s with short exploitation private mining site of lead exploitation time which has and 2005; local government whether it will has been naturally closed; time which has been closed; zinc ore was closed in 1980s; been naturally closed; cleared and closed hold result in new residues have been cleared residues have been cleared residues have been cleared residues have been cleared without left residues; pollution for and pollutant source is and pollutant source is and pollutant source is and pollutant source is vanadium smelting by soil downstream controllable controllable controllable controllable method was stopped by cultivated land government in 2008 and 217 Main factors considered in Name and analysis of demonstration area comparing and selecting demonstration area Yanjing Demonstration Area Xiaba Demonstration Area Nadong Demonstration Area Zhongba Demonstration Area Hangsha Demonstration Area equipment and slag disposal pit inside plant were cleared without left residues and pollutant source is controllable Whether tailings reservoir is safety without leakage if None None None None None there are tailings reservoirs Irrigation water source is Use Ganxi River as irrigation Irrigation water source is Irrigation water source is Irrigation water source is Water quality of Xiaba River and Bize River; water; water quality of Yanduiyan River; water Shuitian River; water quality Zhangweilyudong River; irrigation water water quality of irrigation irrigation water is qualified; quality of irrigation water is of irrigation water is water quality of irrigation (including sediment at upstream of water is qualified; sediment at qualified; sediment at qualified; sediment at water is qualified; sediment at sediment of irrigation water exceeds upstream of irrigation water upstream of irrigation water upstream of irrigation water irrigation water) upstream of irrigation water standard exceeds standard exceeds standard exceeds standard exceeds standard Scope of pH value 5.36-5.67 5.22-5.62 5.49-6.49 5.07-6.92 5.8-7.6 Type of heavy metal Content of main heavy metal Cd: 0.22~0.40 Cd pollution:0.19~0.99 Cd pollution:0.36-1.62 Cd pollution:0.32-1.54 Cd pollution:0.29-0.61 pollution pollution factor (mg/kg) Cd exceeds standard: Cd exceeds standard: Cd exceeds standard: Cd exceeds standard: Cd exceeds standard: Content of heavy 0.18-0.40mg/kg; Pb, As, Cr 0.13-0.95mg/kg; Pb, As, Cr 0.22-0.31mg/kg; Pb, As, Cr 0.05-0.26mg/kg; Pb, As, Cr 0.25-0.45mg/kg; Pb, As, Cr metal in rice and Hg do not exceed and Hg do not exceed and Hg do not exceed and Hg do not exceed and Hg do not exceed (mg/kg) standards standards standards standards standards Emp Whether it is hasis included into local No No No No No degre planning 218 Main factors considered in Name and analysis of demonstration area comparing and selecting demonstration area Yanjing Demonstration Area Xiaba Demonstration Area Nadong Demonstration Area Zhongba Demonstration Area Hangsha Demonstration Area e and Whether heavy partic metal pollution in ipatio soil has been No No No No No n governed in local willi site ngne Activeness of ss farmers or professional agricultural Very active Very active Very active Very active Very active cooperatives in participating in project Non infrastructure Project infrastructure and construction and unsupporting 85% 71% 85% 58% 83% rate in field Total investment amount in various investment demonstration 711 492 342 418 330 areas (10,000 Yuan) Investment of unit 4.94 7.77 8.41 8.65 4.44 ha. (10,000 Yuan) Conclusion Whether it is included into this Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes round of demonstration area 219 Table 8-2 Sheet on Analysis of Site Selection of Jishou Demonstration Area Main factors Name and analysis of demonstration area considered in comparing and Qianzhou Demonstration selecting Shuangtang Demonstration Area Aizhai Demonstration Area Area demonstration area Selected village in Guanhou Ximenkou Shuangtang Zhoujiazhai Daba Daxing Xiaoxing Paixiong Xingfu Yangmeng Jinye demonstration Village Village Sub-district Village Community Village Village Village Village Village Village Regional representativeness area Area, ha. 87.12 45.1 20.31 15.15 14.2 55.2 32.5 50.2 48.5 17.5 61.72 Continuous concentrated 62.6 33.8 14.6 11.36 10.5 44.7 25.6 40.6 37.8 14.2 48.9 area, ha. Main type of Paddy Paddy Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field cultivated land field field Whether it is Grain output: 357 the main grain Grain output: 133 tons/year Grain output: 595 tons/year tons/year output area Whether the Clear: waste water reason for discharged by industrial Clear: waste water discharged by industrial Clear: waste water discharged by industrial and mineral enterprises in the history result heavy metal and mineral enterprises in and mineral enterprises in the history result in in soil pollution pollution is the history result in soil soil pollution Pollu clear pollution tant Whether main Enterprises involved in sourc pollutant heavy metal pollution e is source is have taken effective Enterprises involved in heavy metal pollution clear controllable governance measures have taken effective governance measures Enterprises involved in heavy metal pollution have taken effective governance and and whether it within “the 12th Five-year within “the 12th Five-year Plan” period based measures within “the 12th Five-year Plan” period based on related requirements of contr will result in Plan” period based on on related requirements of environmental environmental protection department; pollutant source is controllable. ollab new pollution related requirements of protection department; pollutant source is le for environmental protection controllable. downstream department; pollutant cultivated land source is controllable. Whether None None None None None None None None None None None tailings 220 Main factors Name and analysis of demonstration area considered in comparing and Qianzhou Demonstration selecting Shuangtang Demonstration Area Aizhai Demonstration Area Area demonstration area reservoir is safety without leakage if there are tailings reservoirs Irrigation water source is Water quality Longzhua Creek and of irrigation mountain spring water; Irrigation water source is Tuojiang River and water Irrigation water source is Gaofeng Reservoir, Hangbajiao Reservoir, Donghe River and water quality of irrigation mountain spring water; water quality of (including spring water; water quality of irrigation water is qualified; sediment at upstream of water is qualified; irrigation water is qualified; sediment at sediment of irrigation water exceeds standard sediment at upstream of upstream of irrigation water exceeds standard irrigation irrigation water exceeds water) standard Scope of pH 4.44-7.74 4.2-7.27 6.31-7.36 5.6-6.91 4.87-7.36 5.38-6.55 6.26-7.86 6.32-7.71 6.65-7.42 7.27-8.0 5.64-7.89 value Content of main heavy Cd Cd Cd Cd Cd Cd Cd Cd Cd Cd Cd Type of heavy metal pollution metal pollution:0 pollution:0. pollution:0.3 pollution:0.4 pollution:0.3 pollution:0.5 pollution:0. pollution:0 pollution:0 pollution:0 pollution:0.3 pollution .54~0.79 42-0.82 1-0.37 -1.13 7-0.4 9-1.24 66-0.88 .37-0.79 .36-0.67 .39-0.67 1-0.46 factor (mg/kg) Cd Cd exceeds Cd exceeds Cd exceeds Cd exceeds Cd exceeds Cd exceeds Cd exceeds Cd exceeds exceeds standard: standard: standard: standard: standard: standard: standard: standard: Cd exceeds As exceeds standard: 0.21-0.26m 0.21-0.24mg/ 0.21-0.25mg 0.21-0.23mg 0.21-0.27m 0.21-0.27 0.21-0.26 0.21-0.24mg standard: standard: 0.22-0.25 g/kg; As kg; As /kg; As /kg; As g/kg; As mg/kg；As mg/kg；As /kg; As 0.21-0.22mg 0.241mg/k Content of mg/kg; As exceeds exceeds exceeds exceeds exceeds exceeds exceeds exceeds /kg; Pb, As, g; Cd, Pb, heavy metal in exceeds standard: standard: standard: standard: standard: standard: standard: standard: Cr and Hg Cr, and Hg rice (mg/kg) standard: 0.207-0.258 0.213-0.228 0.208-0.218 0.207-0.278 0.228-0.271 0.211-0.27 0.215-0.25 0.204-0.271 do not do not 0.21-0.272 ; Pb, Cr, and mg/kg, Pb, mg/kg; Pb, mg/kg; Pb, mg/kg; Pb, mg/kg; Pb, 4mg/kg; mg/kg; Pb, exceed exceed mg/kg; Pb, Hg do not Cr, and Hg Cr, and Hg Cr, and Hg Cr, and Hg Cr, and Hg Pb, Cr, and Cr, and Hg standards standards Cr, and Hg exceed do not do not do not do not do not Hg do not do not do not standards exceed exceed exceed exceed exceed exceed exceed 221 Main factors Name and analysis of demonstration area considered in comparing and Qianzhou Demonstration selecting Shuangtang Demonstration Area Aizhai Demonstration Area Area demonstration area exceed standards standards standards standards standards standards standards standards Whether it is Emphasis degree and participation willingness included into Yes Yes Yes local planning Whether heavy metal pollution in With VIP pilot With VIP pilot With VIP pilot soil has been governed in local site Activeness of farmers or professional agricultural Very active Very active Very active cooperatives in participating in project Non infrastructure Project infrastructure and construction investment and 28% 25% 31% unsupporting rate in field Total investment amount in various 1105 553 2026 demonstration areas (10,000 Yuan) 222 Main factors Name and analysis of demonstration area considered in comparing and Qianzhou Demonstration selecting Shuangtang Demonstration Area Aizhai Demonstration Area Area demonstration area Investment of unit ha. 8.37 11.1 7.64 (10,000 Yuan) Whether it is Conclusion included into this round of Yes Yes Yes demonstration area 223 Table 8-3 Sheet on Analysis of Site Selection of Yongshun County Demonstration Area Name and analysis of demonstration area Main factors considered in comparing and selecting demonstration area Wanping Town Demonstration Area Selected village in demonstration area Longzhai Village, Xinglong Village, Shangping Village, Beiliping Village Regional Main type of agricultural land Paddy field representativeness Area, ha. 257 Whether it is the main grain output area Yes Whether the reason for heavy metal pollution is clear Clear: Residues, slags and waste water of coal ore exploitation pollute soil Whether main pollutant source is controllable and Water quality is clear, and reservoir prevents flood and pollutant source is controllable after closing whether it will result in new pollution for downstream industrial mining enterprises, prohibition of illegal exploitation, and treatment of historically left waste Pollutant source is clear cultivated land residues. and controllable Whether tailings reservoir is safety without leakage if None there are tailings reservoirs Water quality of irrigation water Irrigation water source is Shamuhe Reservoir ; water quality of irrigation water is qualified Type of heavy metal Content of main heavy metal pollution factor Cd pollution pollution Content of heavy metal in rice Cd exceeds standard; Pb, As, Cr, and Hg do not exceed standards Whether it is included into local planning No Whether heavy metal pollution in soil has been governed Emphasis degree and No in local site participation willingness Activeness of farmers or professional agricultural Very active cooperatives in participating in project Total investment amount in various demonstration areas Project infrastructure and (10,000 Yuan) 3051.93 224 construction investment Investment of unit ha. (10,000 Yuan) 11.85 Total investment amount in various demonstration areas (10,000 Yuan) 3051.93 Whether it is included into this round of demonstration Conclusion Yes area 225 Table 8-4 Sheet on Analysis of Site Selection of Huayuan County Demonstration Area Main factors considered in Name and analysis of demonstration area comparing and selecting Mao’er Township Demonstration demonstration area Huayuan Town Demonstration Area Longtan Demonstration Area Malichang Demonstration Area Area Selected village in Laotianping Village, Zhuchao Longmen Village, , Jinrong Village Geyu Village, Wanggao Village Xinzhai Village, Mao’er Village demonstration area Village, Ganggang Village, Region Area, ha. 121 79 61 56 al Continuous represe 106 79 58 50 concentrated area, ha. ntative Main type of cultivated ness Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field land Whether it is the main Grain output is 760kg/year per mu Grain output is 850kg/year per mu Grain output is 650kg/year per mu Grain output is 700kg/year per mu grain output area Clear: Massive poor calcium Clear: Residues, slags and waste Clear: Residues, slags and waste Clear: Residues, slags and waste Whether the reason for phosphate fertilizers bring partial water generated by selection and water generated by beneficiation of water generated by selection and heavy metal pollution heavy metal in the history so beneficiation of lead zinc ore and lead zinc ore and manganese ore beneficiation of lead zinc ore pollute is clear background value of heavy metal beneficiation of molybdenum ore smelting pollute soil soil inside the area is pretty high pollute soil Mining of lead zinc ore has been Polluta closed in 2006 and residues have Whether main pollutant Lead zinc beneficiation enterprises Lead zinc beneficiation plant was Currently, fertilizer used is guided nt been cleared; beneficiation was source is controllable have been closed in 2015 and constructed in 2000 which has by agricultural department which source stopped in 2016 and plants are and whether it will manganese ore smelting plant was stopped production now; residues basically won’t generate new heavy is clear recovered now and no residues left result in new pollution closed in 2010; residues have been have been cleared; no residues and metal pollution on agricultural land and on site; the private mining of for downstream cleared and pollutant source is waste water left on site and pollutant in demonstration area and pollutant control molybdenum ore was in cultivated land controllable. source is controllable source is controllable lable 1980s-1990s without residues left; pollutant source is controllable Whether tailings reservoir is safety None None None None without leakage if there are tailings reservoirs Water quality of Irrigation water is Wuqu and Irrigation water is Longtan River Irrigation water is Jiaoyu River; Irrigation water is Longtan River 226 Main factors considered in Name and analysis of demonstration area comparing and selecting Mao’er Township Demonstration demonstration area Huayuan Town Demonstration Area Longtan Demonstration Area Malichang Demonstration Area Area irrigation water unknown creeks and its water source and its water source is spring water water quality of irrigation water is and its water source is mountain (including sediment of is spring water and rain; water qualified; sediment at upstream of spring water and rain; water quality and rain; water quality of irrigation irrigation water) quality of irrigation water is irrigation water exceeds standard of irrigation water is qualified; qualified; sediment at upstream of water is qualified; sediment at sediment at upstream of irrigation irrigation water exceeds standard upstream of irrigation water exceeds water exceeds standard standard 5.64~7.65; major part of pH is 5.56~8.15; major part of pH is 5.31~8.50; major part of pH is 5.64~8.06; major part of pH is Type Scope of pH value below 6.5 below 6.5 below 6.5 below 6.5 of Content of main heavy heavy Cd: 0.08~0.23 metal pollution factor Cd: 0.15~0.45 Cd pollution:0.18~0.69 Cd pollution:0.16~0.88 metal As exceeds standard: 14.0~37.9 (mg/kg) polluti Over-standard heavy Cd exceeds standard; Pb, As, Hg and Cd exceeds standard; Pb, As, Hg and Cd exceeds standard; Pb, As, Hg and Cd exceeds standard; Pb, As, Hg on metals in rice Cr do not exceed standards Cr do not exceed standards Cr do not exceed standards and Cr do not exceed standards Whether it is included No No No No into local planning Empha Whether heavy metal sis pollution in soil has degree Yes Yes No Yes been governed in local and site partici Activeness of farmers pation or professional willing agricultural Very active Very active Very active Very active ness cooperatives in participating in project Project Non infrastructure and infrastr unsupporting rate in 20% 15% 41% 36% ucture field and Total investment 200 49.95 48.75 94.6 constr amount in various 227 Main factors considered in Name and analysis of demonstration area comparing and selecting Mao’er Township Demonstration demonstration area Huayuan Town Demonstration Area Longtan Demonstration Area Malichang Demonstration Area Area uction demonstration areas invest (10,000 Yuan) ment Investment of unit ha. 1.40 0.34 0.80 1.67 (10,000 Yuan) Whether it is included Conclu into this round of Yes Yes Yes Yes sion demonstration area 228 Table 8-5 Sheet on Analysis of Site Selection of Cili County Demonstration Area Main factors considered in Name and analysis of demonstration area comparing and selecting Dongyueguan Town Yangliupu Township Tongjinpu Town Gaoqiao Town Sanhe Town Demonstration demonstration area Demonstration Area Demonstration Area Demonstration Area Demonstration Area Area Regi Yangfengping Village, Tunhu Village, Pingshan Selected village in Huayue Village, Siqiao Linkuang Village, Guotai onal Liangqiao Villag, Sanyanqiao Village, Chenping Village, Xianfeng Village demonstration area Village Neighborhood Committee repre Village Xingyue Village senta Area, ha. 209.71 155.73 262.13 90 97.85 tiven Main type of ess Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field cultivated land Clear: agricultural land is Clear: agricultural land is Clear: agricultural land is Clear: agricultural land is Clear: agricultural land is Whether the influenced by sewage influenced by sewage influenced by sewage influenced by exploitation of polluted by exploitation of reason for heavy irrigation of Zhuangta irrigation of Zhuangta irrigation of Zhuangta nickel-molybdenum ore in iron ore in history and metal pollution is Reservoir, resulting in heavy Reservoir, resulting in heavy Reservoir, resulting in heavy the history, resulting in heavy cadmium and arsenic brought clear metal pollution metal pollution metal pollution metal pollution by realgar tailings slag Whether main pollutant source is Pollu controllable and tant No; pollutant source No; pollutant source No; pollutant source No; have been included in No; have been effectively whether it will sourc Zhuangta Coal Ore has been Zhuangta Coal Ore has been Zhuangta Coal Ore has been local heavy metal planning governed and ore has been result in new e is closed closed closed which is effectively governed closed. pollution for clear downstream and cultivated land contr Whether tailings ollabl reservoir is safety e without leakage if None None None None None there are tailings reservoirs Water quality of Water quality of irrigation Water quality of irrigation Water quality of irrigation Water quality of irrigation Water quality of irrigation irrigation water water is qualified; sediment at water is qualified; sediment at water is qualified; sediment at water is qualified; sediment at water is qualified; sediment at (including upstream of irrigation water upstream of irrigation water upstream of irrigation water upstream of irrigation water upstream of irrigation water sediment of exceeds standard exceeds standard exceeds standard exceeds standard exceeds standard 229 Main factors considered in Name and analysis of demonstration area comparing and selecting Dongyueguan Town Yangliupu Township Tongjinpu Town Gaoqiao Town Sanhe Town Demonstration demonstration area Demonstration Area Demonstration Area Demonstration Area Demonstration Area Area irrigation water) Type Content of main of heavy metal Cd pollution Cd pollution Cd pollution Cd pollution Cd and As pollution heav pollution factor y (mg/kg) metal Content of heavy Cd exceeds standard; Pb, As, Cd exceeds standard; Pb, As, Cd exceeds standard; Pb, As, Cd exceeds standard; Pb, As, Cd, and As exceed standard; pollu metal in rice Cr, and Hg do not exceed Cr, and Hg do not exceed Cr, and Hg do not exceed Cr, and Hg do not exceed Pb, Cr, and Hg do not exceed tion (mg/kg) standards standards standards standards standards Whether it is included into local No No No No No planning Emp Whether heavy hasis metal pollution in degre soil has been No No No No No e and governed in local partic site ipatio Activeness of n farmers or willi professional ngne agricultural Very active Very active Very active Very active Very active ss cooperatives in participating in project Proje Total investment ct amount in various infras demonstration truct areas (10,000 ure Yuan) 1505.8 1118.2 1882.3 646.3 702.6 and Investment of unit 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 const 230 Main factors considered in Name and analysis of demonstration area comparing and selecting Dongyueguan Town Yangliupu Township Tongjinpu Town Gaoqiao Town Sanhe Town Demonstration demonstration area Demonstration Area Demonstration Area Demonstration Area Demonstration Area Area ructi ha. (10,000 Yuan) on inves tment Whether it is Conc included into this lusio Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes round of n demonstration area 231 Table 8-6 Sheet on Analysis of Site Selection of Zhongfang County Demonstration Area Name and analysis of demonstration area Main factors considered in comparing and selecting demonstration area Xinjian Demonstration Tongwan Demonstration Tongmu Demonstration Luyang Demonstration Area Area Area Area Selected village in demonstration Luxi Village, Heping Village, Xiaping Village, Xinjian Village, Heihetian Zhuyuantou Village Fengpo Village area Qiaoshang Village, Wuli Village Village, Huangjin Village Regional Area, ha. 315 125 60 60 representative ness Main type of cultivated land Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field Whether it is the main grain output Yes Yes Yes Yes area Clear: coal ore Clear: coal ore Clear: coal ore Clear: heavy metal pollution of agricultural exploitation exists in exploitation exists in exploitation exists in Whether the reason for heavy land due to “three wastes” of silicon plant, upstream of demonstration upstream of demonstration upstream of demonstration metal pollution is clear cement plant and other enterprises involved in area in history which area in history which area in history which heavy metal pollution in the history results in pollution results in pollution results in pollution Whether main pollutant source is No; enterprise has been No; enterprise has been No; enterprise has been controllable and whether it will No; enterprise has been closed and pollutant closed and pollutant closed and pollutant closed and pollutant result in new pollution for source is controllable source is controllable source is controllable source is controllable downstream cultivated land Pollutant Whether tailings reservoir is safety source is clear without leakage if there are None None None None and tailings reservoirs controllable Water quality of irrigation Water quality of irrigation Water quality of irrigation Water quality of irrigation water Water quality of irrigation water is qualified; water is qualified; water is qualified; water is qualified; (including sediment of irrigation sediment at upstream of irrigation water sediment at upstream of sediment at upstream of sediment at upstream of water) exceeds standard irrigation water exceeds irrigation water exceeds irrigation water exceeds standard standard standard Content of main heavy metal Cd pollution Cd pollution Cd pollution Cd pollution pollution factor in soil (mg/kg) Content of heavy metal in rice Cd and As pollution Cd pollution Cd pollution Cd pollution (mg/kg) Emphasis Whether it is included into local No No No No degree and planning 232 Name and analysis of demonstration area Main factors considered in comparing and selecting demonstration area Xinjian Demonstration Tongwan Demonstration Tongmu Demonstration Luyang Demonstration Area Area Area Area participation Whether heavy metal pollution in No No No No willingness soil has been governed in local site Activeness of farmers or professional agricultural Very active Very active Very active Very active cooperatives in participating in project Project Total investment amount in infrastructure various demonstration areas and (10,000 Yuan) 2472.9 981.3 471 471 construction Investment of unit ha. (10,000 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 investment Yuan) Whether it is included into this Conclusion Yes Yes Yes Yes round of demonstration area 233 Table 8-7 Sheet on Analysis of Site Selection of Anhua County Demonstration Area Main factors Name and analysis of demonstration area considered in comparing and Jiangnan Town Qingtangpu Town Changtang Town Dongping Town selecting Kuixi Town Demonstration Area Demonstration Area Demonstration Area Demonstration Area Demonstration Area demonstration area Selected village in Bianjiang Village Yushui Village Hezhen Village Zhongdi Village Kuixi Village Muliu Village Reg demonstration ion area al Area, ha. 73.3 87.3 85.3 80 120 80 repr Continuous ese concentrated 58.6 69.8 66.5 63.2 93.6 64 ntat area, ha. ive Main type of nes Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field cultivated land s Whether it is Grain output: 549 Grain output: 654 Grain output: 639 Grain output: 600 Grain output: 900 Grain output: 600 the main grain tons/year tons/year tons/year tons/year tons/year tons/year output area Clear: discharge of Clear: discharge of Clear: discharge of Clear: discharge of Clear: discharge of Clear: discharge of Poll “three wastes” of “three wastes” of “three wastes” of “three wastes” of “three wastes” of “three wastes” of uta Whether the enterprise involved in enterprise involved in enterprise involved in enterprise involved in enterprise involved in enterprise involved in nt reason for heavy metal pollution heavy metal pollution heavy metal pollution heavy metal pollution heavy metal pollution heavy metal pollution sou heavy metal pollute agricultural land pollute agricultural land pollute agricultural land pollute agricultural land pollute agricultural land pollute agricultural land rce pollution is through atmospheric through atmospheric through atmospheric through atmospheric through atmospheric through atmospheric is clear sedimentation and sedimentation and sedimentation and sedimentation and sedimentation and sedimentation and clea sewage irrigation sewage irrigation sewage irrigation sewage irrigation sewage irrigation sewage irrigation r Whether main Pollutant source is Pollutant source is Pollutant source is Pollutant source is Pollutant source is Pollutant source is and pollutant source controllable after closing controllable after closing controllable after closing controllable after closing controllable after closing controllable after closing con is controllable industrial mining industrial mining industrial mining industrial mining industrial mining industrial mining troll and whether it enterprises, banning enterprises, banning enterprises, banning enterprises, banning enterprises, banning enterprises, banning able will result in illegal exploitation and illegal exploitation and illegal exploitation and illegal exploitation and illegal exploitation and illegal exploitation and 234 Main factors Name and analysis of demonstration area considered in comparing and Jiangnan Town Qingtangpu Town Changtang Town Dongping Town selecting Kuixi Town Demonstration Area Demonstration Area Demonstration Area Demonstration Area Demonstration Area demonstration area new pollution governing historically governing historically governing historically governing historically governing historically governing historically for downstream left residues left residues left residues left residues left residues left residues cultivated land Whether tailings reservoir is safety without None None None None None None leakage if there are tailings reservoirs Use Shuangxi Reservoir Irrigation water source is Water quality Irrigation water source is Irrigation water source is Irrigation water source is and Niujiaotang natural well and Irrigation water source is of irrigation mountain spring water; Kuixi and Zujintang Kuixi and Zujintang Reservoir as irrigation Xiaxiadong’ao Chenxi; water quality of water water quality of Reservoir; water quality Reservoir; water quality water; water quality of Reservoir; water quality irrigation water source is (including irrigation water source is of irrigation water source of irrigation water source irrigation water source is of irrigation water source qualified; sediment at sediment of qualified; sediment at is qualified; sediment at is qualified; sediment at qualified; sediment at is qualified; sediment at upstream of irrigation irrigation upstream of irrigation upstream of irrigation upstream of irrigation upstream of irrigation upstream of irrigation water exceeds standard water) water exceeds standard water exceeds standard water exceeds standard water exceeds standard water exceeds standard Scope of pH 5.66-6.47 5.4-7.93 4.93-7.73 4.42-7.42 4.83-6.94 4.97-7.26 Typ value e of Content of Cd pollution: 0.33~4.81; Cd pollution:0.52~4.86; Cd pollution:0.49-3.09; hea main heavy another point has another point has small parts have Cd pollution:0.66-2.43 Cd pollution:0.37-3.52 Cd pollution:0.43-1.69 vy metal pollution compound Cd and Hg compound Cd and As compound Cd and As met factor (mg/kg) pollution pollution pollution al Cd exceeds standard: Cd exceeds standard: Cd exceeds standard: Cd exceeds standard: Cd exceeds standard: Cd exceeds standard: poll Content of 0.29-3.1; As exceeds 0.22-0.94; As exceeds 0.21-2.5; As exceeds 0.21-2.6; As exceeds 0.29-1.2; As exceeds 0.39-4.4; Pb, As, Cr and utio heavy metal in standard: 0.207-0.331， standard: 0.208-0.247， standard: 0.262-0.319， standard: 0.24，Pb, Cr, standard: 0.235-0.506g， Hg do not exceed n rice (mg/kg) Pb, Cr, and Hg do not Pb, Cr, and Hg do not Pb, Cr, and Hg do not and Hg do not exceed Pb, Cr, and Hg do not standards exceed standards exceed standards exceed standards standards exceed standards 235 Main factors Name and analysis of demonstration area considered in comparing and Jiangnan Town Qingtangpu Town Changtang Town Dongping Town selecting Kuixi Town Demonstration Area Demonstration Area Demonstration Area Demonstration Area Demonstration Area demonstration area Whether it is Em included into No No No Yes No No pha local planning sis Whether heavy deg metal pollution ree in soil has been No No No Yes, With VIP pilot No No and governed in part local site icip Activeness of atio farmers or n professional will agricultural Very active Very active Very active Very active Very active Very active ing cooperatives in nes participating in s project Proj Non ect infrastructure infr and 60% 30% 25% 20% 31% 55% astr unsupporting uct rate in field ure Total and investment con amount in stru various 613.02 728.2 711 669.8 1673.24 ctio demonstration n areas (10,000 inv Yuan) est Investment of 8.36 8.34 8.33 8.37 8.37 me unit ha. (10,000 236 Main factors Name and analysis of demonstration area considered in comparing and Jiangnan Town Qingtangpu Town Changtang Town Dongping Town selecting Kuixi Town Demonstration Area Demonstration Area Demonstration Area Demonstration Area Demonstration Area demonstration area nt Yuan) Whether it is Con included into clus this round of Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ion demonstration area 237 Table 8-8 Sheet on Analysis of Site Selection of Hengnan County Demonstration Area Main factors Name and analysis of demonstration area considered in comparing Qishan Office Quanhu Town Lijiang Town Xiangyang Town Xiantang Huaqiao Town Chashi Town Jiangkou Town and selecting Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration demonstratio Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Area n area Selecte d village Suhu Village, Maiyuan Village, in Qishan Village Qitang Village Jiepai Village Changtang Village Lianhua Village Sanping Village Zhushan Village Liushun Village demons tration area Area, 68.7 97.7 105.3 254.39 72.1 254.39 98.3 81 Regional representativeness ha. Continu ous concent 55.6 78 80 206 53.2 200 68 65 rated area, ha. Main type of Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field cultivat ed land Whethe r it is the Grain output is Grain output is Grain output is Grain output is Grain output is /年 Grain output is Grain output is Grain output is main 1004kg/year per 1227kg/year per 1008kg/year per 1221kg/year per 1021kg/year per 815kg/year per mu 965kg/year per mu 991kg/year per mu grain mu mu mu mu mu output area Po Whethe Clear: mineral Clear: there was 1 Clear: the pollutant Clear: there was Clear: there was Clear: 2 iron ore Clear: The main Clear: catastrophic llu r the resources in arsenic smelting source of the area one pig farm in the one gypsum ore in and tungsten ore pollutant source of flood in 2006 and ta reason demonstration area plant in the area. is mainly historical demonstration the area previously smelting plants this area is 2007 resulted in nt for are bountiful with The plant mainly pollution of previously; direct which mainly were constructed upstream industrial flow-backward of 238 Main factors Name and analysis of demonstration area considered in comparing Qishan Office Quanhu Town Lijiang Town Xiangyang Town Xiantang Huaqiao Town Chashi Town Jiangkou Town and selecting Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration demonstratio Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Area n area so heavy main pollutant produces waste various Xiangjiang discharge of “three produces waste in 1940s. Waste and mining Lishui stayed half ur metal source of high water and residues River wastes” of water and residues water and residue enterprise pollution a month there ce pollutio background value with arsenic hoggery results in with calcium of pollutant factors of Leishui River, which brought is n is of heavy metal in pollution factor, serious pollution sulphate and other including iron and the irrigation water massive sludge and cl clear soil resulted from which results in of demonstration factors, resulting in tungsten lead result source, and 2 local pollutants and ea soil parent arsenic pollution area. pollution of in historical pig farms. polluted plough r on surrounded area demonstration pollution of layer. an area. demonstrationarea d and surrounded co cultivated land. nt Whethe The gypsum ore ro r main The plant plant was closed In recent years, Up to now, pig lla pollutan has been closed in due to bankruptcy Xiangjiang River farm has been bl t source 2007 and in 2008 and The iron smelting is not used for governed; With cleaning and e is equipment inside equipment inside plant and tungsten irrigation through meanwhile, Lishui governance in controll the plant and slag the plant and slag ore smelting plant changing irrigation shall not be used to recent yeas, able and Phosphate fertilizer disposal pit have Pig farms have disposal pit have have been closed water source and irrigate through sludge, pollutants whether containing high been cleaned when been completely been cleaned when 50 years ago and other measures; changing irrigation and alien species it will cadmium has been the enterprise was closed which the enterprise was there are basically therefore, pollutant water source and resulted from flood result in stopped using closed which won’t cause new closed without no residues left source is basically other measures; have been new inside the area. won’t generate pollution. residues left on which won’t result managed and therefore, pollutant basically cleaned pollutio new heavy metal site, which won’t in new pollution of controlled which source is basically which won’t result n for pollution on generate new demonstration won’t generate controlled which in new pollution. downstr agricultural land in heavy metal area. new heavy metal won’t result in new eam demonstration pollution on pollution. pollution. cultivat area. surrounded ed land agricultural land. Whethe r None None None None None None None None tailings reservoi 239 Main factors Name and analysis of demonstration area considered in comparing Qishan Office Quanhu Town Lijiang Town Xiangyang Town Xiantang Huaqiao Town Chashi Town Jiangkou Town and selecting Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration demonstratio Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Area n area r is safety without leakage if there are tailings reservoi rs Water Irrigation water Irrigation water Irrigation water Irrigation water Use mountain Irrigation water quality source is source is Irrigation water source is source is Irrigation water spring water as source is hilly of Shuangbanqiao Shangfeng source is Lutang Longxiqiao Songmutangqiao source is hilly irrigation water; pond water; water irrigatio Reservoir; water Reservoir; water Reservoir; water Reservoir; water Reservoir; water pond; water quality water quality of quality of n water quality of quality of quality of irrigation quality of quality of of irrigation water irrigation water irrigation water (includi irrigation water irrigation water water source is irrigation water irrigation water source is qualified; source is qualified; source is qualified; ng source is qualified; source is qualified; qualified; sediment source is qualified; source is qualified; sediment at sediment at sediment at sedimen sediment at sediment at at upstream of sediment at sediment at upstream of upstream of upstream of t of upstream of upstream of irrigation water upstream of upstream of irrigation water irrigation water irrigation water irrigatio irrigation water irrigation water exceeds standard irrigation water irrigation water exceeds standard exceeds standard exceeds standard n water) exceeds standard exceeds standard exceeds standard exceeds standard Ty Scope pe of pH 5.45-7.12 5.5-7.97 5.79-8.03 5.79-8.03 6.15-7.54 5.23-6.81 5.2-8.1 7.38-8.1 of value he Content av of main Cd pollution: Cd pollution: Cd pollution: Cd pollution: Cd pollution: Cd pollution: Cd pollution: Cd pollution: y heavy 0.36~1.73 0.31~1.2 0.23~0.82 0.36~2.20 0.26~0.74 0.15~0.72 0.21~6.63 0.32~0.59 m metal As pollution: As pollution: As pollution: As pollution: As pollution: As pollution: As pollution: As pollution: et pollutio 6.8~28.2 7.4~23.7 7.0~42.4 6.51~28.5 20.1~52.3 23.4~66.1 16.2~135 8.8~19.3 al n factor po (mg/kg) 240 Main factors Name and analysis of demonstration area considered in comparing Qishan Office Quanhu Town Lijiang Town Xiangyang Town Xiantang Huaqiao Town Chashi Town Jiangkou Town and selecting Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration demonstratio Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Area n area llu Content Cd exceeds Cd exceeds Cd exceeds Cd exceeds Cd exceeds Cd exceeds Cd exceeds Cd exceeds tio of standard: standard: standard: standard: standard: standard: standard: standard: n heavy 0.43-0.67mg/kg; 0.29-0.32mg/kg; 0.35-0.43mg/kg; 0.35-0.43mg/kg; 0.32-0.32mg/kg; 0.29-0.38mg/kg; 0.32-0.32mg/kg; 0.29-0.38mg/kg; metal in Pb, As, Cr and Hg Pb, As, Cr and Hg Pb, As, Cr and Hg Pb, As, Cr and Hg Pb, As, Cr and Hg Pb, As, Cr and Hg Pb, As, Cr and Hg Pb, As, Cr and Hg rice do not exceed do not exceed do not exceed do not exceed do not exceed do not exceed do not exceed do not exceed (mg/kg) standards standards standards standards standards standards standards standards Whethe r it is E include m d into No No No No No No No No ph local as plannin is g de Whethe gr r heavy ee metal an pollutio d n in soil pa has No No No No No No No No rti been ci governe pa d in tio local n site wi Activen lli ess of ng farmers ne or Very active Very active Very active Very active Very active Very active Very active Very active ss professi onal agricult 241 Main factors Name and analysis of demonstration area considered in comparing Qishan Office Quanhu Town Lijiang Town Xiangyang Town Xiantang Huaqiao Town Chashi Town Jiangkou Town and selecting Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration demonstratio Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Area n area ural coopera tives in particip ating in project 242 Table 8-9 Sheet on Analysis of Site Selection of Yizhang County Demonstration Area Main factors considered Name and analysis of demonstration area in selecting demonstration area Meitian Town Wuling Town Yiliu Town Project Village Meitian Village, Huangshi Village Raotian Village, Taipingli Village, Dengjiawan Village Shijietou Village Regi Area (ha.) 150.47 264.46 63.33 onal repre Continuous senta concentrated area 102.3 211 52.5 tiven (ha.) ess Main type of Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field cultivated land Grain output 2327 2561 3802 (ton/mu) The irrigation water source of the demonstration The irrigation water source of the demonstration area is The irrigation water source of the area is Wushui River; the upstream of Wushui Zhangshui River; the upstream of Wushui River is demonstration area is Changle River; there is River flows through Linwu County. There were originated from Yangtian Lake in Beihu District, which Pollu no tailings reservoir around the demonstration many nonferrous metal (such as lead zinc ore) flows into the demonstration area through passing Suxian tant area and in upstream, no residue piling and left mining and beneficiation plants started to emerge District. There were many mining and beneficiation plants sour issues of private mining. There are many in 1990s in Linwu County. Massive beneficiation in upstream Beihu District and Suxian District. They are ce is tanneries within 1km around the demonstration waste water is directly discharged into Wushui mainly lead zinc ores which are started to produce in large clear Pollutant source area along the history and their produced waste River without being processed, resulting in scope in 1990s and massive beneficiation waste water is and water and solid wastes include cadmium, serious pollution of water quality of Wushui directly discharged into Zhangshui River without being contr arsenic and other heavy metals. Cadmium and River and cadmium, arsenic and other factors processed, resulting in serious pollution of water quality of ollab arsenic pollution in soil is polluted as product seriously exceed standard. However, the Zhangshui River and cadmium, arsenic and other factors le waste water flows through demonstration area demonstration area is irrigated by Wushui River seriously exceed standard. However, the demonstration and nonstandard piling of solid wastes and raw along the history; so cadmium and arsenic in soil area is irrigated by Zhangshui River along the history; so materials. of agricultural land exceed standard due to cadmium and arsenic in soil of agricultural land exceed 243 cadmium and arsenic accumulation. standard due to cadmium and arsenic accumulation. Whether main pollutant source is Water quality of Wuhui River, the irrigation Water quality of Changle River, the irrigation controllable and Water quality of Zhangshui River, the irrigation water water source, has been qualified through water source, has been qualified through whether it will source, has been qualified through governance; there is no governance; there is no heavy metal pollution governance; there is no heavy metal pollution result in new heavy metal pollution enterprise inside the demonstration enterprise in the demonstration area and enterprise inside the demonstration area and pollution for area and surrounded area. surrounded area surrounded area. downstream cultivated land Whether there is tailings reservoir, and safety No tailings No tailings No tailings evaluation on tailings reservoir Water quality of Irrigation water source is Wushui River; water Irrigation water source is Changleshui River; irrigation water Irrigation water source is Zhangshui River; water quality quality of irrigation water source is qualified; water quality of irrigation water source is (including of irrigation water source is qualified; sediment at sediment at upstream of irrigation water exceeds qualified; sediment at upstream of irrigation sediment of upstream of irrigation water exceeds standard standard water exceeds standard irrigation water) Type Scope of pH value 5.75-6.26 5.5-6.3 5.37-6.26 of Content of main heav heavy metal Cd pollution:0.28~1.7 Cd pollution:0.28~1.7 Cd pollution:0.28~1.7 y pollution factor As pollution: 7.39~42.5 As pollution: 7.39~42.5 As pollution: 7.39~42.5 meta (mg/kg) l Content of heavy Cd exceeds standard: 0.23—0.85; Cd exceeds standard: 0.31—1.4; Cd exceeds standard: 0.3—0.93; pollu metal in rice As exceeds standard: 0.331; As exceeds standard: 0.21—0.284; As exceeds standard: 0.257—0.404; tion (mg/kg) Pb, Cr, and Hg do not exceed standards Pb, Cr, and Hg do not exceed standards Pb, Cr, and Hg do not exceed standards Emp Whether it is No No No 244 hasis included into local degr planning ee Whether heavy and metal pollution has No No No parti been governed in cipat local site ion willi Activeness of the High High High ngne mass ss Proje Non infrastructure ct and unsupporting 12% 12% 12% infra rate in field struc ture and Unit investment 6.3 4.74 4.34 inves (10,000 Yuan/ha.) tmen t Whether it is Conc included into this lusio round of project Yes Yes Yes n implementation plan 245 Table 8-10 Sheet on Analysis of Site Selection of Linwu County Demonstration Area Main factors considered in Name and analysis of demonstration area comparing and selecting demonstration area Wushui Demonstration Area Nanqiang Demonstration Area Selected village in Chengtou Village Wenxi Village, Tiantou Village, Liantang Village demonstration area Region Area, ha. 68.8 187.4 al Continuous concentrated represe 58.3 175.4 area, ha. ntative Main type of cultivated ness Paddy field Paddy field land Whether it is the main Grain output: kg/year per mu Grain output: kg/year per mu grain output area Whether the reason for heavy metal pollution is Clear: historical pollution Clear: historical pollution clear Whether main pollutant Polluta source is controllable and nt whether it will result in Pollutant source is controllable Pollutant source is controllable source new pollution for is clear downstream cultivated and land control Whether tailings reservoir lable is safety without leakage if None None there are tailings reservoirs Water quality of irrigation Irrigation water source is Wushui River; heavy metal index of irrigation Irrigation water source is Wanshuidong Reservoir; water quality of water (including sediment water source is qualified; sediment at upstream of irrigation water exceeds irrigation water source is qualified; sediment at upstream of irrigation of irrigation water) standard water exceeds standard Type of Scope of pH value 5.15—6.47 6.12—7.95 heavy Content of main heavy metal metal pollution factor in Cd 0.27-2.71mg/kg; Hg 0.13-0.39mg/kg; As 6.35-180mg/kg Cd 0.29-0.89mg/kg; As 11.6-44.9mg/kg polluti soil (mg/kg) 246 Main factors considered in Name and analysis of demonstration area comparing and selecting demonstration area Wushui Demonstration Area Nanqiang Demonstration Area on Content of heavy metal in Cd is at extremely high risk and As is at middle risk As is at middle risk rice (mg/kg) Whether it is included into Empha No No local planning sis Whether heavy metal degree pollution in soil has been No No and governed in local site particip Activeness of farmers or ation professional agricultural willing Very active Very active cooperatives in ness participating in project Project Non infrastructure and 65% 75% infrastr unsupporting rate in field ucture Total investment amount and in various demonstration 340 720 constru areas (10,000 Yuan) ction Investment of unit ha. invest 4.94 3.84 (10,000 Yuan) ment Whether it is included into Conclu this round of Yes Yes sion demonstration area 247 Table 8-11 Sheet on Analysis of Site Selection of Lengshuitan District Demonstration Area Main factors considered in Name and analysis of demonstration area comparing and selecting Xianghuaba Demonstration Shixijiang Village Demonstration Lishan Village Demonstration demonstration area Qishan Village Demonstration Area Area Area Area Selected village in Xianghuaba Village Shixijiang Village Lishan Village Qishan Village demonstration area Regio Area, ha. 173.33 186.66 100 140 nal Continuous repres 121.1 152.5 78.2 113.4 concentrated area, ha. entativ Main type of eness Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field Paddy field cultivated land Whether it is the main Grain output: 2133 Grain output: 2389 tons/year Grain output: 1233 tons/year Grain output: 1726 tons/year grain output area tons/year Clear: historical pollution Whether the reason for Clear: historical pollution source of Clear: historical pollution source source of manganese ore, Clear: historical pollution source of silicon heavy metal pollution manganese ore and coal ore results of manganese ore results in soil coal ore and silicon oxide ore dioxide ore results in soil pollution is clear in soil pollution pollution results in soil pollution Whether main Pollutant source is pollutant source is Pollutant source is controllable after Pollutant source is controllable controllable after closing Pollutant source is controllable after closing Polluta controllable and closing industrial mining after closing industrial mining industrial mining enterprises, industrial mining enterprises, banning illegal nt whether it will result enterprises, banning illegal enterprises, banning illegal banning illegal exploitation exploitation and governing historically left source in new pollution for exploitation and governing exploitation and governing and governing historically residues. is clear downstream cultivated historically left residues. historically left residues. left residues. and land control Whether tailings lable reservoir is safety without leakage if None None None None there are tailings reservoirs Water quality of Irrigation water source is Irrigation water source is Lanjiang Irrigation water source is Irrigation water source is Musitang Reservoir irrigation water Dengjiachong Reservoir; River; water quality of irrigation Musitang Reservoir and Shankou and Shankou Reservoir; water quality of (including sediment of water quality of irrigation water source is qualified; sediment Reservoir; water quality of irrigation water source is qualified; sediment 248 Main factors considered in Name and analysis of demonstration area comparing and selecting Xianghuaba Demonstration Shixijiang Village Demonstration Lishan Village Demonstration demonstration area Qishan Village Demonstration Area Area Area Area irrigation water) water source is qualified; at upstream of irrigation water irrigation water source is at upstream of irrigation water exceeds sediment at upstream of exceeds standard qualified; sediment at upstream of standard irrigation water exceeds irrigation water exceeds standard standard Scope of pH value 6.0-7.8 5.65-6.39 5.96-7.54 4.96-7.85 Type Content of main heavy Cd pollution:0.32~1.6; ; Cd pollution:0.41~0.98; ; small Cd pollution:0.28-0.55; ; small Cd pollution:0.25-0.41; small amount of of metal pollution factor small amount of compound amount of compound Cd and Hg amount of compound Cd and Hg compound Cd and Hg pollution heavy (mg/kg) Cd and Hg pollution pollution pollution metal Cd exceeds standard: polluti 0.25-0.92mg/kg; As exceeds Cd exceeds standard: As exceeds standard: Cd exceeds standard: 0.34-0.4mg/kg; As Content of heavy on standard: 0.236-0.483mg/kg; 0.21-1.8mg/kg; Pb, As, Cr and Hg 0.242-0.364mg/kg; Cd, Pb, Cr, exceeds standard: 0.252-0.536mg/kg; Pb, Cr, metal in rice (mg/kg) Pb, Cr, and Hg do not exceed do not exceed standards and Hg do not exceed standards and Hg do not exceed standards standards Whether it is included No Yes Yes Yes into local planning Empha Whether heavy metal sis pollution in soil has degree No No Yes, With VIP pilot Yes, With VIP pilot been governed in local and site partici Activeness of farmers pation or professional willing agricultural Very active Very active Very active Very active ness cooperatives in participating in project Project Non infrastructure and infrast unsupporting rate in 30% 25% 22% 35% ructure field and Total investment constr amount in various 1871.9 1569.8 789.3 895.65 uction demonstration areas 249 Main factors considered in Name and analysis of demonstration area comparing and selecting Xianghuaba Demonstration Shixijiang Village Demonstration Lishan Village Demonstration demonstration area Qishan Village Demonstration Area Area Area Area invest (10,000 Yuan) ment Investment of unit ha. 10.8 8.41 7.89 6.39 (10,000 Yuan) Whether it is included Concl into this round of Yes Yes Yes Yes usion demonstration area 250 Table 8-12 Sheet on Analysis of Site Selection of Qiyang County Demonstration Area Main factors considered in comparing and selecting Name and analysis of demonstration area demonstration area Xiaojia Demonstration Area Baishui Demonstration Area Niutouwan Village, Niuling Village, Wangjiaping Village, Selected village in demonstration area Xinzhong Village, Liaotang Village Jinxing Village Area, ha. 426.93 136.33 Regional representative Continuous concentrated area, ha. 420 136.33 ness Main type of cultivated land Paddy field Paddy field Whether it is the main grain output area Yes Yes Clear: residues, slags and waste water generated due to Whether the reason for heavy metal Clear: residues, slags and waste water generated due to iron and upstream tin ore exploitation and manganese ore beneficiation pollution is clear manganese ore exploitation pollute soil pollute soil Whether main pollutant source is Tin ore mining site was closed in 2000; private mining site of The exploitation time was 1990s in small scope which was controllable and whether it will result in manganese ore and small coarse beneficiation plant were Pollutant closed at the end of 1990s. Residues have been cleared and new pollution for downstream cultivated closed in 2000. Beneficiation plant was removed, residues are source is clear pollutant source is controllable land cleared and pollutant source is controllable and Whether tailings reservoir is safety controllable without leakage if there are tailings None None reservoirs Irrigation water source is Dajiangbian Reservoir; water quality Irrigation water source is Baishui River; water quality of Water quality of irrigation water of irrigation water source is qualified; sediment at upstream of irrigation water source is qualified; sediment at upstream of (including sediment of irrigation water) irrigation water exceeds standard irrigation water exceeds standard Scope of pH value 4.86-7.05 5.19-5.46 Type of heavy Content of main heavy metal pollution metal Cd pollution:0.22~0.57 Cd: 0.24~0.34mg/kg factor (mg/kg) pollution Cd exceeds standard: 0.028-0.70mg/kg; As exceeds standard: Cd exceeds standard: 0.015~2.1mg/kg; As exceeds standard: Content of heavy metal in rice (mg/kg) 0.10-0.42mg/kg; Pb, Cr, and Hg do not exceed standards 0.11~0.39 mg/kg; Pb, Cr, and Hg do not exceed standards Whether it is included into local planning No No Emphasis Whether heavy metal pollution in soil has degree and No No been governed in local site participation Activeness of farmers or professional willingness agricultural cooperatives in participating Very active Very active in project 251 Main factors considered in comparing and selecting Name and analysis of demonstration area demonstration area Xiaojia Demonstration Area Baishui Demonstration Area Project Non infrastructure and unsupporting rate 47% 35% infrastructure in field and Total investment amount in various 329.6 129.9 construction demonstration areas (10,000 Yuan) investment Investment of unit ha. (10,000 Yuan) 0.77 0.95 Whether it is included into this round of Conclusion Yes Yes demonstration area 252