sugar price;average annual household consumption;change in quantity demanded;removal of trade barriers;price elasticity of demand;competition authority;representative ...  See More + household survey data;barriers to trade;value added tax;adult equivalent;cost of import;average exchange rate;sugar production;rural poverty line;trade policy reform;urban poverty line;level of consumption;local production;economies of scale;national poverty line;total consumption expenditure;per capita consumption;net welfare impact;effects on income;incidence of poverty;change in prices;loss of employment;net welfare effect;elasticity of substitution;change cost;increase in prices;barrier to competition;cost of ship;availability of imports;price of sugar;competitive market structure;effect of price;removal of subsidy;welfare of consumers;global financial crisis;percentage of income;investment in capacity;domestic retail market;raw cane sugar;global food crises;retail price;poor household;price spike;domestic production;price change;sugar industry;sugar cane;price decrease;household expenditure;government intervention;world price;equivalent income;import tariff;estimated elasticity;wholesale price;real income;import parity;food market;food price;inland transport;local price;sugar mill;consumer welfare;international shipping;international competition;human consumption;sugar factory;upper bind;poverty incidence;maize price;household income;competition policy;anticompetitive conduct;state intervention;maize market;price reduction;sugar company;local producer;sugar sector;development policy;domestic industry;finished product;cane production;capacity utilization;price competition;substitution effect;supply side;dry grain;government involvement;pending lawsuit;raw sugar;vertical line;transport cost;import control;ad valorem;caloric intake;specific duty;world sugar;household welfare;open trade;import permit;welfare costs;income decile;price rise;anticompetitive practices;kenyan shilling;monopoly power;rural area;price series;international market;welfare analysis;solid line;household size;privatization commission;household production;investment climate;finished goods;world market;previous paragraph;dramatic change;anticompetitive behavior;market price;income household;capacities in support;regional market;price sensitivity;market entry;urban population;average consumption;disposable income;urban poor;household spending;consumption pattern;private mill;beet sugar;price surge;population weighting;compensating variation;household use;hammer mill;seasonal drop;net effect;local supply;median income;premium price;price effect;seasonal fluctuation;positive impact;restricted import;retail outlet;industrial mill;land price;data error;fixed rate;budget share;consumption level;price pressure;government restriction;import quota;high tariff;industrial miller;shelf life;urban market;household behavior;import volume;sugar manufacture;industrial purpose;domestic value;domestic demand;public discourse;adjustment period;expenditure share;government ownership;illegal import;regression techniques;local industry;seasonal differences;functional form;expenditure function;wholesale market;export ban;preferential access;Exchange Rates;informal payment;average household;quantity rationing;domestic investment;price setting;commodity group;test statistic;import cost;domestic supply;demand elasticity;consumption datum;income effect;nontariff barrier;pioneering work;open access;seasonal pattern;competitive price;competition agency;port charge;seasonal condition;foreign competition;limited capacity;welfare gains;restrictive trade;domestic price;average price;short period;standard deviation;sugar consumption;longer period;border price;Trade Policies;  See Less -