ricu ture ion 4 5+..6 3 a 3 - m . * .'-'%! . rathway, Synergies and Outcomes u From Agriculture to Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies and Outcomes THE WORLD BANK AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT O 2007The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818H Street,NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone 202-473-1000 Internet www.worldbank.org/rural E-mail ardOworldbank.org All rights reserved. This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. The findings, interpretations,and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directorsof The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accu- racy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors,denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with completeinformation to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, http:/ /www.copyright.com/. All other queries on rights and licenses,including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, The World Bank, 1818H Street NW, Washington,DC 20433, USA, fax 202-522-2422, e-mail pubrightsOworldbank.org. Cover photos by World Bank staff members: vegetable produce at a Guatemalan market by Curt Carnemark;Senegalesegirl carrying cassava leavesby Lianqin Wang; mother in BangIadeshfeeding her child a food supplement by Shehzad Noorani. A C R O N Y M S A N D ABBREVIATIONS vii A C K N O W L E D G M E N T S ix EXECUTIVE S U M M A R Y xi World Food SecurityAnd Nutrition Situation 2 Structure of the Report 7 Determinantsof Human Nutrition and the Pathways Linking Agriculture and Nutrition 9 Pathways LinkingAgriculture to Nutrition 12 The Impact of Agriculture Interventionson Nutrition Outcomes 15 The Nutritional Impacts of Agricultural Interventions 16 Gender Outcomes of Agricultural Interventions 30 Lessons Learned 31 Orange-Fleshed Sweet Potato Production and Vitamin A Deficiency in Mozambique 33 Legume Systems and Child Nutrition in Malawi 36 Integrating Homestead Gardening and Primary Health Care Activities in South Africa 38 Homestead Gardening for Fruits, Vegetables, and Livestock in Asia 39 Lessons from the Four Case Studies 42 iv Contents The Changing Context of Agriculture and Nutrition Linkages 43 Agricultural Policy 43 Agricultural Technology 47 Food MarketingSystems 50 Food Consumption Patterns 53 Conclusions 56 1 Institutional Frameworks for Action in the Agriculture Sector to Address Undernutrition 59 Institutional Barriersto Coordinated Action in Nutrition 60 Resource Allocation and Planning 61 Sector Mandates and Priorities 61 Unique SectoralWorldviews 62 Constrained Capacity for Nutritional Analysis 63 Institutional Mechanismsto EnableAgriculturists to Address Undernutrition 63 Conclusions 67 0 Lessons Learned and Next Steps 69 APPENDIX 73 BIBLIOGRAPHY 75 Figures 1 Estimated Prevalence of Stunted PreschoolChildren 1980-2005 4 2 Estimated Prevalence of Underweight Preschool Children 1980-2005 5 3 Overweight and Obesity amongWomen 45-59 Years of Age, by WHO Region 6 4 Estimated Prevalenceof Overweight Preschool Children (O/O) 7 5 Conceptual Frameworkof the Determinantsof IUutritional Status 10 7 Changes in Food Production per Capita over Ttme 48 6 Potential Impact of Technological Changes on Food Productionand Consumption 48 Contents v Boxes 1 Messagesfrom Publications on Agriculture and Nutrition, 1970s-2000s 11 2 lntroducing Orange-FleshedSweet Potato in Rural Mozambique 34 2 lntroducing Orange-FleshedSweet Potato in Rural Mozambique, Cont. 35 3 Legume Systems in Malawi: Building on Local Knowledge, lmproving Nutrition 37 Trade Liberalization and Food Availability: Synthesisof Cases in SouthAsia 46 Trade Liberalization and FoodAvailability: Synthesisof Cases in South Asia, Cont. 47 Decline in Consumption of Pulses in India: The Effect of Technology and Domestic Policies 49 Situating Nutrition Administratively within the Public Sector 60 The Institutional Study under the Agriculture-Nutrition Advantage Project 61 Nutrition and Sectorwide Approaches to Planning 62 Home Economistsas Agricultural ExtensionAgents 66 Tables 1 Prevalence and Number of Undernourished People in Developing Countries 1990-2003 3 2 Key Results from Selected Studies of Agricultural Commercialization 17 3 Summary of the Evaluation Findingsof Horticultural and Nutrition Projects 21 4 Summary of Intervention Studies on Impactsof Animal Source Food Interventions on Nutrition-Related Outcomes 25 5 Potential Effects of the Changing Context on Pathways LinkingAgriculture and Nutrition 44 6 Annual Average Growth in Retail Sales of Packaged Foods, 1996-2002 51 7 the Growth of Modern Retail in Developing Countries 52 8 Composition of Global Agricultural Food Exports (% of value) 53 9 Average Annual Growth in Global per Capita Consumption ofvarious Food Items (%) 54 10 Average Annual Share of Arable and Permanent Land Used for Harvest (%) 55 11 Worldwide Annual Average Growth in Food Production (%) 56 Acronyms and Abbreviations AVRDC Asian VegetableResearch and Development Center BMI body mass index CDD community-driven development FA0 Food and Agriculture Organization (United Nations) FRT Farmer Research Team HACCP Hazard analysis criticalcontrol point HIV/AIDS Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immune DeficiencySyndrome HKI Helen Keller International TDRC International Development Research Center IFPRI International Food Policy Research Institute NGO nongovernmental organization OECD Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development OFSP orange-fleshed sweet potato SETSAN Technical Secretariat for Food Security and Nutrition (Mozambique) SFHC Soils, Food and Health Communities Study (Malawi) SWAP sectorwide approach TANA The Agriculture-Nutrition Advantage Project UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientificand Cultural Organization UNICEF United Nations Children's Fund USAID United States Agency for International Development VITAA Vitamin Afor Africa VITAL Vitamin AField Support Project WFSP white-fleshed sweet potato WHO World Health Organization WTO World Trade Organization This report was prepared by a multi-institutional and interdiscipli- nary team from the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)and theWorld Bank (WB).Thekey contributorswereCorinna Hawkes, Marie Ruel, Mary Arimond, Zeina Sifri, Todd Benson, Devesh Roy, and Noora-Lisa Aberman (IFPRI), Peter Berti (HealthBridge, Canada), Jef Leroy (National Institute of Public Health, Mexico), Edward Frongillo (University of South Carolina), Nwanze Okidegbe,Lynn Brown,Gunnar Larson, and Chris Delgado (World Bank). The task team would like to extend their thanks to the project ad- visors Nicolas Minot (IFPRI)and Peter Berti (HealthBridge),as well as to Michelle Adato, Damiana Astudillo, Bonnie McClafferty,and Ginette Mignot. The report's content editor was Gumar Larson (World Bank, Agriculture and Rural Development). Peer reviewers included Meera Shekar, James Garrett, Harold Alderman (World Bank), Beatrice Rogers (Tufts University), and Bruce Cogill (UNICEF). The task team thanks Sushma Ganguly (retired), Mark Cackler (SectorManager and Acting Director of World Bank Agricultureand Rural Development),and theARDManagement Committeefor their support and guidance.Theteam acknowledgesLisa Li Xi Lau forher support in the logistics and production of the report. Executive Summary INTRODUCTION In a world of food abundance,millionsof peoplesufferfrompoornu- trition. In some parts of the world, the poor have inadequate access to energy from food to meet their energyrequirements.In these loca- tions, food shortage is often a seasonalphenomenon and micronutri- ents are also generallylacking in the diet. Elsewhere, there is a stable supply of energy but the poor have monotonous diets lacking in es- sential micronutrients. In other places a "nutrition transition" is under way in which the poor and other consumers enjoy sufficient access to energy, and indeed often consume excessive amounts, but the quality of their diets is unhealthy owing to a combinationof fac- tors relating to nutrition and lifestyle. Excessive consumption com- bined with more sedentary lifestyles, often associated with urbanization, contributes to an increasing incidence of obesity and chronic disease such as diabetes in countries stillplagued by under- nutrition. A combination of these nutritional problems adversely af- fectsabout 2billion people worldwide. The relationship between agriculture and human nutrition is far more complex than the relationship between food production and foodconsumption or the economicrelationshipbetween foodsupply and food demand. Increased food production raises the availability of food, but by itself does little to ensure that poor and vulnerable people have access to the food that is produced. Nor does the gross quantity produced saymuch about the quality or nutritional value of people's diets. The persistence of malnutrition as a global public health concern despite the successes in increasing agricultural pro- duction belies any notion that malnutrition and undernutrition can be solved entirely from the supply side. How then can agriculture, with itscustomary focuson productivity and yields,more effectively contribute to improved nutrition outcomes? Expanding agriculture's purview and capacity to embrace those contributing factorsand determinants of nutrition that are tradition- ally the provinceof other disciplinesor improvingagriculture's inter- face with other, nonagricultural sectors, suggest themselves as possibleways forward. Thosesectorsthat approach nutrition in rela- tion to its essential role in building and maintaining human capital areparticularlyimportant prospectivecounterparts in thisregard.Yet operationally integrating the necessary inputs of other sectors into agriculture interventions, or effectivelycoordinating the respective xii FromAgriculture to Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies,and Outcomes contributionsof sectorministriesin largerdevelop- that shed light on how agricultural interventions ment programs and policies, is in practice fraught and investmentsmay improvenutrition outcomes with difficulty. Historically, multisector efforts in- in low-and middle-incomecountries. tended to simultaneouslyaddress agricultureand nutrition have oftenbeen hindered by institutional PATHWAYS LINKING barriers and insufficientresources. The limitations of production-focused agricul- AGRICULTURETO NUTRITION tural programs and interventionsin deliveringim- Awidelyused conceptualframeworkpublished by proved nutrition impactshave been recognizedby UNICEF in 1990identifies three main underlying somein theagriculturalcommunityfordecades. In determinantsof nutritional status:availability and the early 1980sa number of internationaldevelop- access to food, the quality of feedingand care giv- ment agencies undertook programs that sought to ingpractices,and thehealthof thesurrounding en- orient agricultural production to nutrition-related vironment and access to health care services. Each objectives, and over time a substantialbody of lit- of these determinants is a necessary but not suffi- erature developed around the analysis of the pro- cient condition to good nutrition. The food supply grams' results. A review of this literature yields a chain linkingfoodproductionwith foodconsump- number of insights as to how agricultural invest- tion and human nutrition can be usefully consid- mentscanbedesignedand targeted to improvenu- ered in terms of fivepathruays. trition outcomes. Malnutrition remains an urgent global public health concern. Yet the question of Subsistence-oriented production for the how agriculturecan most effectively contribute to household's own consumption improved nutrition outcomes remains essentially Income-orientedproductionforsaleinmarkets unanswered. It is therefore time to revisit what is Reduction in real food prices associated with known and what can be done to improve the syn- increasedagriculturalproduction ergiesbetween agriculture and nutrition. The po- Empowerment of women as agents instru- tential contribution of agriculture needs to be mental to household food securityand health reexamined, especially in light of the changes the outcomes sector has undergone, by reviewing lessons from Indirect relationshipbetween increasing agri- past experienceand by analyzingcurrentdevelop- cultural productivityand nutrition outcomes ments and what they mean for future change.That throughtheagriculturesector's contributionto is the purpose of this report. national incomeand macroeconomicgrowth Household production for the household's orun con- sumption is the most fundamental and direct path- OBJECTIVE way by which increasedproduction translatesinto The report seeks to analyzewhat has been learned greaterfood availabilityand food security.Thedif- abouthow agriculturalinterventionsinfluencenu- ferent types of foods produced determine the im- trition outcomes in low- and middle-incomecoun- pact of the production increaseon diet quality. The tries, focusing on the target populations of the production of staple foods leads mainly to greater MillenniumDevelopmentGoals-people livingon access to and consumption of energy. Increased lessthan a dollar aday.It alsosetsout tosynthesize production of fruit, vegetables,and animal source lessons from past efforts to improve the synergies foods (dairy, eggs, fish, and meat) can likewise between agriculture and nutrition outcomes. The raise accessto energy,protein, and fat,but can also report identifiesanumberof developmentsinagri- greatlyimprovethequalityand micronutrientcon- culture and nutrition that have transformed the tentof diets.Someproportionof thefoodproduced context in which nutrition is affected by agricul- may also be intended for sale on local markets. ture. These developmentshave considerableprac- Somehouseholds may for instance meet their sta- tical significance for nutrition-related agricultural ples requirementsthemselveswhile depending on programs?includingthe design of those programs markets for other products such as fruits and veg- that aim to improvenutritional outcomes. Finally, etables. Others may rely mainly on home gardens the report draws a number of practicalconclusions for fruits and vegetables. Whatever role produc- ... Executive Summarv XIII tion-for-incomeplays in this scenario is secondary fromfood toother expenditures,includingproduc- to the principal purpose of producing food to meet tive investments. the household's own food requirements. Finally,agriculturalgrowth itself representsan in- Income-oriented production for sale in markets. AS direct pathway to better nutrition through its con- agricultural households become more market ori- tribution to macroeconomic growth and higher ented, production-for-own-consumption becomes levelsof national income,whichcan support nutri- less significantrelative to income from the sale of tional improvements by reducing poverty. what is produced. Technology becomes more im- Increases in agricultural productivity have been portant relative tothehousehold's resourceendow- vital factors in building sustained economic ment, and the selection of crops to be grown is growth in both developed and developing coun- based principally on their tradability and the price tries and have major impacts on poverty. One they are expected to command in local markets. cross-country analysis found that a 1percent in- Extra income may be used to buy more food, crease in agricultural yields lowers the percentage higher-quality (morenutrient-dense)foods,orboth; of anational population livingon less than a dollar thebalancebetween the twoaffectsthe finalimpact a day by between 0.64 and 0.91 percent-a poverty of this additional income on the household's con- effect that appears particularly great in African sumption of energy and micronutrients.The trans- countries (Thirtleetal.2002).Overall,however, the lation of increased income into better child economic growth-to-malnutrition relationship is nutrition,in turn, dependsona seriesof intrahouse- modest. A doubling of gross national product hold factors and processes.These includewomen's (GNP) per capita in developing countrieshas been status, education, knowledge, health-related prac- associated with a much more modest reduction in tices, decision-makingpower, income,and accessto childhood undemutrition-on the order of 23to 32 and use of health and sanitationservices. percent (Haddadet al. 2003). The empowerment of ~uomenis a pathway that car- ries special significance for household nutrition outcomes and in particular for children's health THE IMPACT OF AGRICULTURAL and nutrition outcomes.Women have consistently INTERVENTIONSON NUTRITION been found to be more likely than men to invest in OUTCOMES their children's health and well-being, and the in- come and resources that women controlwield dis- The literature reviewed in this report documents proportionately strong effects on health and the nutrition outcomes of agricultural programs nutrition outcomes generally. Women who are and can be usefully classified by the type of com- reached by agricultural programs that relay infor- modity the program involved: staples, fruits and mation onnutrition issuesappear tobe particularly vegetables, or animal source foods. Studies on the effective at delivering improved nutrition out- nutritional impacts of programs involving staple comes, and the effects appear to be most pro- crops such as maize and rice focused overwhelm- nounced among the lowest income groups. Taken ingly on aggregate production and food availabil- together,thesecharacteristicsmakewomennatural ity rather than on individual- or household-level prioritiesfor agricultural programs that aim at im- indicatorsand thereforeyielded littleevidencethat proving nutrition. These programs,however, must is germane to this report. Moreover, the only agri- take women's time and resource constraints firmly cultural interventions involving staple foods that into account and, where and when possible, seek havebeen evaluated fromanutritional perspective means of relieving them. concern agricultural commercialization-the con- Lo~ueringfood retail prices by increasingfood pro- version from staple subsistencefood production to duction is another pathway linking agriculture to commercialfoodproduction.Thistype of interven- nutrition and is especially important in areas in tion aims to improvenutritional outcomesthrough which markets are less integrated. For net con- both the own-consumption and the income path- sumers, reduced food prices enable greater access ways, with potential indirect impacts through the to food and essential nutrients, resulting in better agricultural growth and price pathways. Evidence health and productivity for the general workforce fromthe review of studiesonagricultural commer- while also freeing additional household resources cialization shows increases in household income, xiv FromAgriculture to Nutrition: F'athways,Synergies, and Outcomes including greater income controlled by women in nutrient-rich foods by target population groups, some cases and greater household food expendi- and the two studies that measured biochemicalin- ture.Thesechangesdid not,however,translateinto dicators showed reductions in vitamin A defi- substantial improvements in child nutrition. In ciency. Common elements that appear to have order to improve childhood nutrition, agricultural contributed to the success of these four programs commercializationinterventionswould most likely includea strongbehaviorchangecomponent,care- need tobe complementedby components or paral- ful consideration of local contexts, partnership lelinterventionsthat specificallytarget otherdeter- building with different community members to minants of child nutrition. These would include promote ownership, and a specific focus on improved health, care giving practices, and access women's empowerment. The studies alsoreaffirm towater and sanitationfacilitiestoaddress thehigh that careful evaluation design is critical but re- rates ofinfectionsaffectingyoung children in poor mains a challenge, as does the scaling up of suc- environments. cessfulpilot programs. Agricultural interventions promoting increased Overall the review documents a wide range of production of fruit and vegetables-such as those successfulagriculturalinterventionsthathave con- involvinghomestead gardens--carry considerable tributed to improved nutrition outcomes. In most potential to effectively address micronutrient defi- cases, however, the exact pathways by which im- ciencies.Thereview identifiedasignificantbody of pacts on nutrition have been achievedare difficult evidence documenting the success of homestead to track.Most studies document impactson several gardens in raising production, income, household intermediary outcomes such as food security, in- consumption, and the intake of targeted fruit and come, or women's empowerment, but without di- vegetables by vulnerable population groups. rectly modeling these pathways of impact to Several programs also showed significant impacts nutrition outcomes.Because these outcomes are so on dietary and biochemical indicators of micronu- closely intertwined, it is impossible to determine trient deficiencies,and especially sowhen they in- from this literature the relative importance of the cluded components designed to change behavior different pathways that connect agriculture and through education and to empower women. nutrition. Programs and interventions involving animal The key lessons learned from this body of evi- source foods have even greater potential to tackle dence are that agricultural interventions are most micronutrient deficiencies, especially vitamin A, likely to affect nutrition outcomes when they in- iron, and zinc deficiencies. These micronutrients volve diverse and complementary processes and are more readily bioavailable in animal source strategiesthat redirect the focusbeyond agriculture foods than in plant foods. Several interventions for food productionand toward broader considera- showed gains in production, income, and house- tionof livelihoods,women's empowerment,and op- hold food security,and significantly greater nutri- timal intrahousehold uses of resources. Successful tion impacts when combined with interventions projects are those that invest broadly in improving involvingwomen's empowerment,education, and human capital, sustain and increase the livelihood behavior change. assetsof the poor,and focus on genderequality. Four case studies of agricultural interventions were reviewed because of their unique contribu- tion to the body of knowledge on the linkages be- THE CHANGING CONTEXT OF tween agriculture and nutrition. They include an AGRICULTURE AND NUTRITION orange-fleshed sweet potato intervention to im- LINKAGES prove vitamin A intake in Mozambique, a legume systems and child nutrition program in Malawi, a Over time, changes in the global environment homestead gardening project integrated with pri- have been modifying how agriculture affects nu- mary health care activities in SouthAfrica, and an trition and have made the need for integrating integratedhomesteadgardeningand livestockpro- agriculture and nutrition interventions even more gram in Asia. All fourprograms achieved their ul- imperative. Four types of global changes are em- timate objective of improving the intake of focus phasized in the report:changes in agricultural pol- Executive Summary xv icy, agricultural technology, food marketing sys- availability,prices, demand, and consumption are tems, and food consumption patterns. These plant breeding and technologiesrelated tofood p r e changes affect the broader context within which cessingand marketing, such as those that maintain nutrition-oriented agricultural interventions are a cold-chain from farm to plate. Technologies that implemented. They also affect each of the path- increase productivity, such as Green Revolution ways through which agriculture affects nutrition, crop breeding technologies, have significantly re- notably consumption of own-production, pro- duced foodpricesof the targeted crops.This in turn ducer incomes, and food prices. has led to significantreductions in childhood mal- nutrition. Simulationmodels estimate that without the Green Revolution, the proportion of malnour- Agricultural Policy ished children in South Asia would now be 12to 15 Agricultural policy in most developing countries points higher than it is. Improvements in posthar- has recently undergone a major paradigm shift as vest technologyand marketing forfruit and vegeta- part of what is often termed "globalization." bles canalsolead tosigruficantlyreduced consumer Although the role of the government in food mar- food prices. Changes in technology affect the de- kets remains extensive,governments have disman- mand for agricultural labor and thus the income of tled state marketing mechanisms and liberalized farm and nonfarm households in rural areas. New trade and investment. The level of taxationor "dis- technologies can be labor saving or labor enhanc- protection" of agriculture has declined over time ing; some may have no effect at all on labor de- through trade liberalization in the nonagricultural mand. Studies published during the 1990s sectors and changes in exchange rate regimes. documented a variety of positive impacts of tech- Privatemarkets havegenerallyassumed greater im- nology change on labor demand, incomes, food portance relative to state intervention, and agricul- consumption, and diet quality-but failed to ex- ture's increased market orientation has changed hibit an impact on childhood nutrition. (Thiswas in producers' incentives, with important effects on factattributed to thefailureof increasedincomeand food availabilityand prices. food consumption to translate intobetter childcare, At the national level, the impact of liberalization feeding, and health-seeking behaviors-key ele- on commodity prices will vary acrosscommodities ments of improved nutrition.) Biofortification, an depending on whether thecountry isa net-importer agricultural technology that can increase the mi- or a net-exporter of that commodity.The observed cronutrient contentof staples,may conferlargeben- pattern of trade in which developing countries are efitstopoor rural populations whohavelittleaccess net exporters of high-value, micronutrient-rich to expensive high-quality foods. These improved crops implies that consumer prices are higher for crops can benefit nutrition through the own-con- thoseproducts than the pricesthat would prevail in sumption pathway when they are consumed by a closed economy.The reverse would hold for the producers, through the incomepathway when they supply of macronutrients since many developing are sold, or through the food price pathway when countries are net importers of grains. Agricultural they increase the availability of micronutrient-rich policy changes can also affectnutrition through the foods in the marketplace. producer income pathway. Again, the overall im- pact of trade liberalizationon incomeis likely todif- Food Marketing Systems fer depending on the initialstatusof the country (as a net importer or exporter), and across farmers The past two decades have seen a major transfor- within the country depending on whether they are mation and consolidation of food retail and an ex- net producers or net consumers. pansion of the food processing and food service industries, especially in middle-income countries and in urban areas of low-income countries. These AgriculturalTechnology trends are driven by rising household incomes,ur- The growth of agricultural technology has been banization, improvements in transportation, dramatic over the past 25years. Developments that lifestyle changes, and liberalized foreign invest- carry particularly important implications for food ment regulations. The rapid growth of supermar- xvi FromAgriculture to Nutrition: Pdthways, Synergies, and Outcomes kets in developing countries in the past 10 to 20 sedentary lifestylesare dramatically reducing the years is increasingly important in shaping food level of physical activity and thus energy require- consumption patterns and will most likely affect ments. Negative outcomes like obesity, heart dis- nutrition through changes in food availability and ease, and diabetes quicklybecome endemic, which prices. With the rising availability and generally in turn prompt additional changes in the demand lower prices of processed foods in marketplaces forfood. Functionalfoodsthat carryhealthbenefits and food serviceestablishmentsthroughout much become the focusof advertising and the communi- of the developing world, a growing proportion of cation of health-related information,with dramatic foodexpenditures go toprocessed foodsrelativeto effects on the types of foods that are demanded. fresh food sources.Changes in the composition of The trend offersa variety of important opportuni- agricultural exports also affect the types and price ties for producers who are able to respond to the of foods available and current trends show rapid changing demand. As consumers manifest greater growth in the share of agricultural products that willingness to pay more for healthier foods, re- are processed compared with fresh products. This sponsive producers find a very real prospect that changing pattern of exports has implications for the downward pressure on prices exerted by in- nutrition through the price pathway because it in- creased production may be reversed. However creases the availabilityof certain foods over others promising this prospect may be, the ability of poor in exporting and importing countries. Whereas producers tocapitalizeonthe emergingopportuni- consumers in developing countries now consume ties is contingent on a number of factors,not the more processed foods and vegetable oils exported least of which is the risk of converting to the culti- from developed and other developing countries, vation of unfamiliar crops. In the final analysis, consumers in industrialized countries now con- much will depend on the successof arrangements sume more fruits, vegetables, and fish exported like contract farming, which enables poor farmers from developingcountries. tolink their production with large,oftensupermar- ket-led supply chains. ChangingConsumption Patterns Conclusion The demand for higher-value, micronutrient-rich foods increases as incomes rise and livelihoodsdi- Changes in agricultural policy, technology, mar- versify around expanding markets, many of them kets, and associated changes in food consumption urban. Increasing incomes and urbanization drive patterns arechangingthepathways through which changes in demand that provide food suppliers agriculture and nutrition are linked. Today, the with market signals that tend to reorient agricul- more market-oriented nature of agricultural poli- tural production away from the cultivation of sta- cies means that agricultural technology and mar- ples and toward higher-value products. For kets play a more important role in determining smallholders in particular, this reorientation is food prices and rural incomes,as morefood iscon- often in effect compulsory, because the viability of sumed from the marketplace and less from house- farming lower-value staple crops relies on much holds' own-production. The greater market larger scales of production than are possible on orientation of food production and consumption small farms. For food consumers, and especially has increased the bidirectionallinks between agri- net foodconsumers,the shiftinconsumption away culture and nutrition. Agricultural production re- fromstaplesand toward higher-valuefood sources mains an important factor contributing to brings aphenomenon that isgenericallyreferredto nutritional outcomes,but changingfoodand nutri- as the "nutrition transition." The phenomenon is tionaldemands are exertingnew effectson agricul- most pronounced in rapidly growing economies tural production. Agricultural programs with and inurban areas,in which theproportion of food nutritional objectives need to take this changing prepared at home declines in relation to the pro- context into account to ensure that the synergies portion of processed foods consumed in and out- between agriculture and nutrition are successfully side the home. Diets tend to become increasingly exploited and lead overall to better development energy-dense,and very oftenexcessivelyso, at the outcomes. same time that automation, transportation, and Executive Summary xvii INSTITUTIONS LESSONS LEARNEDAND NEXT STEPS Improving nutritional outcomes is a decidedly multisectoral goal and requiresthe involvementof Policy makersand practitioners have long aimed to several players, including households and public influencenutritionaloutcomesthrough agricultural and private sector agents. It also requires the in- programs.Many oftheseprograms supported com- volvement of government institutions that formu- mercializationand cashcropproductionor thepro- latepublic policy and that insodoing influencethe duction of fruit and vegetables or animal source settings in which agriculture-nutrition pathways foodswith overallobjectivesof raising agricultural are or are not operationalized. Jurisdiction over productivity and household income. The assump- food production and food supply is generally as- tion was that agriculturewould tacklepoverty and signed to a country's ministry of agriculture. malnutritionby increasingfood production,lower- Nutrition, however, is not ordinarily considered a ing food prices, and increasinghousehold income. sectorbut rather apolicy issueor areathat doesnot While food production and household food avail- fallcleanlywithin thejurisdiction of any particular ability, income, and in many cases food consump- ministry or agency.Health ministriesgenerally as- tion and diet quality increased, childhood sume the most direct responsibility for nutrition, malnutrition persisted. This led to the conclusion but they have no administrativejurisdiction or in- that increasingagriculturalproductionand income fluenceover agricultureor trade-the most impor- were probably necessary but clearly not sufficient tant sector ministries addressing food supply and conditions to reducing malnutrition.Far more sub- availability.Commonsense may suggestthe estab- stantial impacts were achieved when agricultural lishment of a governmental multisector agency to interventionsincorporatednonagriculturalcompo- coordinate joint action among these ministries, a nents or combined with complementary nonagri- course which has been pursued by a number of cultural interventions that addressed other countries. These coordinating bodies have how- determinants of child nutrition. These other deter- ever seen little if any successin achievingeffective minants included maternal health-seeking and cooperationbetween sector ministries,leaving lit- caregiving practices. Arming women with knowl- tle empiricalbasis for assuming that such institu- edge about appropriate child feedingpractices, the tional adaptations actually work. Concerted importance of different micronutrients, and the programmatic coordinationbetweendifferentmin- food sources in which those micronutrients are isterial-levelinstitutionstends to runheadlonginto available was a particularly effective way of im- the bureaucraticbarriers that divide spheres of re- proving child health and nutrition outcomes. sponsibility between different line ministries. Incorporating nonagricultural criteria like Bureaucracies in general are organized to ration- health and nutrition into thedesignand conductof ally divide responsibilities within institutions,not agricultural programs to improve nutrition sug- to orchestrate joint collaboration between them. gests developing an effective interface between Coordinationbetween different government insti- agricultural and other institutions. Yet systematic tutions is therefore problematical, but cannot be high-level coordination between different sector dismissedaltogether.Possibilitiesfor suchcollabo- ministries is challenging given the bureaucratic ration are by no means limited to systematichigh- barriers that typically divide them. The report level institutional frameworks. More limited, thereforeexamined alternative approaches to for- lower-level opportunities for collaboration to ad- mulating amorecomprehensiveapproachfor agri- dress specific and local issues contributing to mal- cultureprograms to embraceimprovednutrition as nutrition appear to offer greater promise for a developmentobjective. effectiveaction. This local collaborationoffers the The empiricalevidence presented in this report prospect of incrementally improving higher-level focuseson agriculturalprogramsand interventions coordination of multisectoral action to address carried out at the level of local communities. food insecurity and malnutrition effectively on a Overall, the review found that the most successful nationalbasis. projects were those that invested broadly in im- proving human capital and sustained and in- creased the livelihood assets of the poor. The four xviii FromAgricullure to Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies, and Outcomes key lessons learned about how these programs tion to the health and nutrition of their should be developed and implemented in order to children is an established axiom of develop- help achieve improved nutrition outcomes are ment planning. This education by no means summarized below. has to be limited to formal education. Communication of information about health Develop and iinpleinent agriclrlttrral prograins issues such as appropriate child-feedingand that take into account local contexts. The impor- childcarepractices,water sanitation,and food tance of designing programs that accommo- safety issues carries great importance for nu- date prevailing agricultural and nutritional tritionby addressing caregivingand health as conditions has long been recognized and en- necessary conditionsofgood nutrition. Other tails developing a sound understanding of public information services, including those producers' priorities, incentives, assets, vul- agriculturalextension servicesthatconveyin- nerabilities, and livelihood strategies. For theseprograms to benefitnutrition, however, formation about issues like integrated pest there is also a need to understand and target management, likewise have important posi- the major nutritional problems experienced tive health impacts and many can also be tai- by the target communities an aspect that is lored to reach women. usually ignored in agricultural program de- Develop and impleineiit agrictrlttrral prograins sign and development. Understanding the that incorporate ntrtrition otrtreach and behavior motivesand constraintsthat affecthousehold change. Whether regarded as a resource or a consumption decisions is no less important service, the value of information that is di- than understanding those that affectproduc- rected atbehaviorchangeamong farmersand tion decisions. Cultural norms, for instance, consumers presents itself as a salient conclu- are often key factors determining which sion of this report. Agricultural interventions household members maintain control over that include anutrition education component which household resources, and influence will increase the likelihood of positive nutri- such nutritionally vital decisions as the allo- tional outcomes. Those who are armed with cation of types and quantities of food among information and knowledge about the nutri- household members. Thus, successful agri- tional significance of the foods they produce culture programs aimed at improving nutri- and eat are able to make better production tion must first develop an understanding of and consumptiondecisions.Nutrition-related the economic,social,and cultural factors that educationand communicationstrategiesmay determine household decisions concerning offer instruction on food preparation and livelihood,agricultureproduction,household safety and on child-care and feeding prac- consumption, and intrahousehold allocation tices, as well as on how to recognize and act of resources, as well as the context-specific upon signs of nutritional deficiencies. Here, health and nutrition problems that prevail. too, targeting women with health and nutri- Develop and iinpleinent agrictrlttrral programs tion informationislikely tohave astillgreater that enable arid empozucr roomen. The essential catalyticeffect, given their typically closer af- role of women in deliveringhealth and nutri- filiation with the household and their crucial tion outcomes makes gender an inevitable role as child caretaker. priority area for agricultural programs and * Prozlide sinall prodticers rclith help and strpport to policies that seek to contribute to nutrition. respond to changes in the global environment and Targeting women in their roles as economic especially to the changing food demand. Anti- agents and stewards of household food secu- cipating and responding to changing demand rity and health generally entails increasing is a vital imperativefor farmersin general,but their access to productive resources and serv- among poor farmers in developing countries ices-an ostensibly straightforward proposi- the stakes are particularly high. A significant tion that in reality must take into accountand part of their production is intended for their purposefully navigate around a variety of households' own consumption,and therefore women's constraints, including cultural con- much of thedemand they aresatisfyingis their straints. The significance of women's educa- own. With respect to the proportion of food Executive Summary xix they produce for market, thechangingagricul- learned sheds light on the dynamics and causal re- tural context has important implications for lations that agricultural practitioners should take the prices they are paid for their products, into accountwhen planning programs or providing while increasing demand for high-value food policy advice that focuses the crosshairs of produc- sources represents an important opportunity tion goals onto a nutrition-related target or targets. toearnmore income.Yet switchingtonew and There isby now good reason toanticipate that nutri- unfamiliar crops and producing for foreign tional aims will come to play more prominently in markets with stringent food quality and safety the calculusby which the value of agricultural pro- requirements is also fraught with risk, and grams is rated. Future agricultural programs irnple- both opportunities and risks need to be ad- mented with nutritional objectives will need to dressed by agricultural programs. address the real challenge of going to scale and This report consistsmainly of a review of empir- should be carefully monitored and rigorously eval- ical evidence about past and ongoing cases of agri- uated toensurethat performancecanbe continually cultural interventions with nutrition-related tracked and improved. The expository account of- objectives and more broadly about connectionsbe- feredin this report,itishoped, laysthe groundwork tween agricultural production and nutrition. Its for more practical work in which the details of ap- analysis of the practical implications of the lessons plying theselessonsoperationallycanbe prescribed. Introduction In a world abundant with food, millions of people suffer from poor nutrition. In some parts of the world, the poor have inadequate ac- cess to energy (measured in calories) from food. In these locations, food shortages are often seasonal phenomena, and the quantitative deficitoffoodenergy is generallymatched by deficitsin food quality reflectedin insufficientessentialmicronutrients including vitaminA, iron, zinc, folate, and many others. Elsewhere consumption among the poor is characterized by monotonous diets in which these mi- cronutrient deficiencies are found despite stable and sufficient in- takes of food energy. Still other places see a "nutrition transition" under way in which diets are characterized by excessive intakes of energy, largely from fat, added sugars, and energy-dense processed foods,and in which lifestylesare characterized by generallylow lev- els of physical activity.This combination of excessive energy intake and low activity patterns is associated with overweight and obesity and a variety of chronic diseases including diabetes and heart dis- ease.Togetherthese adverse nutrition outcomes affectsome 2 billion people worldwide. The factorsthat contribute to malnutrition and poor nutrition out- comesarecomplexandvary acrossproduction and consumption set- tings. Sector-specific strategies tend to approach nutrition issues along narrowly disciplinary lines and generally disregard contribut- ing factors that fall outside the purview of that particular field. Agriculture's role as the source of food production makes its signifi- cance tonutrition unquestionable.Yet thepersistenceof malnutrition as a globalpublic health concerndespite increasingagricultural pro- duction belies any notion that the malnutrition and undernutrition problem can be solved entirely from the supply side by increasing production. Nutrition is intrinsically multisectoral,and strategies to improve nutrition outcomes should seek to purposefully integrate thecontributionsof relevant disciplines.How agriculture's necessary input intonutrition issues is to be operationally coordinated with the likewisenecessary input of nonagricultural sectorsis a more difficult matter. Historically, multisector efforts intended to simultaneously address agriculture and nutrition have often been hindered by insti- tutional barriers and insufficientresources. Agricultural investments and interventions supported by the World Bank and other internationaldevelopment and donor agencies have seldom explicitly incorporated nutrition-related objectives.The From Agriculture to Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies, and Outcomes World Bank itself lastexamined thisissuein 1981in lessonsfrompast experienceand by analyzingcur- a study by Per Pinstrup-Andersen, which made a rent developments and what they mean for future number of recommendationsfor incorporatingnu- change.This is the purpose of this report. tritionaleffectsintothedesignand planningof agri- More specifically, the report seeks to analyze cultural policies and programs. A recent review of what hasbeenlearnedabouthow agriculturalinter- its agriculture and rural development portfolio re- ventions influence nutrition outcomes in low- and vealed littleor no lending for nutrition issues to be middle-income countries, focusing on the target included in agriculturaleducationor extensionser- populations of the Millennium Development vices.Theonlynutrition-focusedagriculturalinter- Goals-people living on less than a dollar a day. It ventions to receive significant support from also setsout to synthesizelessons from past institu- international development and donor agencies in tionaland organizationaleffortstoimprovethesyn- recent years involved the still-developingtechnol- ergiesbetween agricultureand nutrition outcomes. ogy of biofortification. The report identifies a number of developments in The contexts in which agriculture and nutrition agricultureand nutrition that have transformedthe arelinked have,moreover,changed sincethe 1980s contextin which nutrition isaffectedby agriculture. (Hawkesand Rue12006b).Thefocusof nutrition as These developments have considerable practical a development issue, and a human development significance for nutrition-related agricultural pro- issueinparticular, has expanded from an early em- gramsincluding thedesignof thoseprogramsthat phasis on energy-protein deficiency to include mi- aimtoimprovenutritionaloutcomes.Finally,there- cronutrient deficiencies,and more recently extends port setsout a number of practical conclusionsthat to the relationship between excess energy intake, shed light on how agriculturalinterventionsand in- poor-quality diets, obesity, and chronic diseases. vestmentsmay improvenutrition outcomes in low- The agricultural context itself is also changing. and middle-incomecountries. Although 75percent of the world's poor still livein rural areas with poor access to markets and ser- WORLD FOODSECURITYAND vices, fewer people are now dependent on agricul- NUTRITIONSITUATION turefor their livelihoodsand more areconnected to markets.Thepercentageof poor people who livein TheFood and AgriculturalOrganization (FAO)es- urban areas in developing countries is growing. timates that in 200043,854 million people world- Urbanization reflects a migration away from rural, wide were undernourished, as defined by food agriculture-based employment and into urban intakes that are continuously inadequate to meet livelihoods.Peoplein citiesare lesslikely to experi- dietary energyrequirements(FA02006).Thenum- ence undernutrition and more likely to experience ber included 820 million people in developing the "nutrition transition" toward energy-dense countries, 25 million in transition countries, and 9 diets high in fats, sweeteners, and highly refined million in industrialized countries. In developing carbohydrates(Popkin1999).Overall,theprocesses countries,thisrepresents a declineofonly3million of global market integration, or "globalization," people since 1990-92. And although significant have increased the market-orientation of the agri- progress has been achieved in Asia, the number of food system worldwide, unleashing dynamics undernourished people in Africa has been increas- throughout the food supply chain that affect food ing, as shown in table 1. producers and consumers. Food security, a broader concept than under- Malnutrition remains an urgent global public nourishment, necessarily goesbeyond the satisfac- health concern. The question of how agriculture tion of people's energy requirements through can most effectivelycontribute to improved nutri- sufficient intakes to encompass access to "suffi- tion outcomes remains unanswered. It is therefore cient, safe and nutritious food to meet dietary timeto revisit what isknown and what canbe done needs and food preferences for an active and to improve the synergiesbetween agriculture and healthy life" (FA0 1996).A summary of the nutri- nutrition.The potential contribution of agriculture tional situation in the world is presented here in needs to be reexamined, especially in light of the three categories: childhood undernutrition, mi- changes the sector has undergone, by reviewing cronutrient deficiencies, and overweight and obe- Introduction 3 sity and related chronic diseases. More complete cronutrient deficienciesand disproportionately af- analyses of these trends are available in the 2006 fect women and young children. World Bank report Repositioning Nutrition for Childhood undernutrition dropped globallybe- De7relopment and in the fourth and fifth reports on tween 1980and 2005.Stunting now affectsapprox- the world nutrition situation issued by the United imately one-third of all children in the developing Nations Standing Committee on Nutrition in 2000 world, compared to one-half in 1980.The propor- and 2004. tionof underweight childrenfell from38percent to 25 percent during the same period. Yet there were an estimated 164.79million stunted and 137.95mil- Child Undernutrition lion underweight children in developing countries It is well recognizedthat the mostnutritionally vul- in 2005. Figures 1and 2 show that most of the re- nerable population groups are pregnant and lac- ductions in undernutrition since the 1980s have tating women, whose bodies must cope with the been achieved inAsia and LatinAmerica.In Africa, additional nutritional stresses and demands of the number of stunted children decreased, while pregnancy and lactation, and infants and young the proportion and number of those who are un- children up to age two. The present report ad- derweight increased slightly dressesthese vulnerable groups,but with a greater emphasis on children's nutrition because most of Micronutrient Deficiencies the work linking agriculture and nutrition to date has focused on this age group. Childhood under- Vitamin A, iron, zinc, and iodine are the most nutrition is typically reflected in anthropometric widespread nutritional deficienciesglobally, and indicators such as stunting (low height-for-age), they affect women and young children dispropor- wasting (lowweight-for-height),and underweight tionately. They may or may not overlap with pro- (low weight-for-age).Stunting reflectsthe cumula- tein and energy deficits. Vitamin A deficiency is tive effects of inadequatenutrition, whereas wast- widespread throughout the developing world, af- ing reflects more recent or acute weight loss.These fectingbetween 78 and 254 millionpeople, includ- symptoms are nonspecific and reflect a combina- ing an estimated 127 million children (UN SCN tion of nutritional deficiencies including protein, 2004; West 2002). Shortage of the nutrient in the energy, and/or micronutrients. They may be sea- diet can limit growth, weaken immunity, causexe- sonal or chronic. Dietary shortages of vitamin A, rophthalmia (an irreversible eye disorder leading iodine, iron, and zinc are the most widespread mi- to blindness), and increasemortality. Seventyper- 4 FromAgriculture to Nutrition: Pa~hways,Synergies, and Outcomes cent of preschool children in Benin and Kenya are immune function. In school-agechildren, it can af- subclinically vitamin A deficient,compared tojust fectschoolperformance,and in adultsit may lower 5 percent in Venezuela, revealing the wide vari- work capacity.Iron deficiency anemia is responsi- ability in the condition's prevalence among devel- ble for tens of thousands of maternal deaths each oping countries (Somrnerand West 1996). year (UNSCN 2004). Iron deficiency is estimated to be the most Iodine and zinc deficiency are also widespread prevalent nutritional deficiency, affecting4 billion and account for a large share of the poor develop- to 5 billion people. The estimated prevalence of ment, health, and survival outcomesof children in iron deficiencyamong children under fiveyears of developing countries (UNSCN 2004).Deficiencies age in 80 developing countries in 2004 was 54 per- of key vitamins and minerals continue to beperva- cent, as compared to an estimated 34 percent who sive,and they overlap considerablywith problems are vitamin A deficient. Again,the range in preva- of general undernutrition (underweight, wasting, lence behveen countries is wide. An estimated 20 and stunting). percent to35percentof children under fiveyears of age are iron deficiency anemic in Latin America Overweight, Obesity, and Diet-Related and Southeast Asia, compared to an estimated 75 Chronic Diseases percent to 85 percent in many African countries (Adarnson2004).In young children,iron deficiency A set of very different nutrition-related outcomes may impair growth, cognitive development, and affect people whose nutrient intakes exceed their Introduction 5 energy expenditures, resulting in obesityand a va- but in Latin America, the Middle East, and South riety of chronic diseases associated with excess Africa,overweightisalsohigher than underweight weight, including heart disease and diabetes. in rural areas (Mendez and Popkin 2004).Overall, Among poorer populations in particular, energy- the World Health Organization predicts that by dense, low-quality diets are likely to remain defi- 2015,approximately 2.3billion adults will be over- cient in essential micronutrients. Overweight and weight and more than 700 million will be obese obesityarenow highly prevalent inevery region of (WHO2006). the world.' Theprevalence of overweight children Overweight and obesity are strongly associated under five is also increasing throughout the devel- with the risk of several chronic diseases,including oping world. Theprevalence of childhood obesity diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and several in the developing world increased by 17percent types of cancer. Figures 3 and 4 show trends in between 1995 and 2005, whereas in Africa it in- overweight by region since the 1980samong adult creased by 58percent. The reason that Africais ex- women and among preschool children. Chronic periencing such an exaggerated trend is not diseasesare the largestcauseof death in the world, entirely clear, owing to a lack of data, but the rise in prevalence of overweight among mothers is likely to be part of the explanation (World Bank 1 Overweight is defined as a body mass index (BMI) 2006b). The prevalence of overweight is consider- (weight/height square)greater than 25;obesity is defined as ably higher in urban areas in the developingworld, BMI greater than 30. 6 From Agriculture to Nutrillon: Pathways, Synergies, and Outcomes led by cardiovascular disease (17million deaths in ease is the leading cause of mortality (WHO2005). 2002, mainly from ischemic heart disease and The global prevalence of the leading chronic dis- stroke) followed by cancer (7 million deaths), eases is projected to increase substantially during \ chroniclung diseases(4million),and diabetesmel- the next two decades. The number of individuals litus (almost1million)(Yachet al. 2004).Although with diabetes,forinstance,isprojected to rise from chronic diseases have been the leading cause of 171million or 2.8percent of the global population death in developed countries for decades, 80 per- in 2000 to 366 million, or 6.5 percent in 2030-298 cent of deaths from chronic diseases now occur in million of whom will live in developing countries developing countries,in which cardiovascular dis- (Wild et al.2004). Introduction 7 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT The background and description of types of ad- verse nutrition outcomes given in this introduction are followed in chapter 2 by an analysis of the de- terminants of human nutrition, setting out a num- ber of pathways through which agriculture can potentially affectnutrition. Chapter 3 presents a re- view of available evidence of how agricultural in- terventions influence nutrition outcomes. Chapter 4 presents a series of four more detailed case stud- ies of agricultural interventions that had explicit nutrition-related objectives. Chapter 5 examines the changesin agriculture and nutrition that are af- fecting the operational contexts in which nutrition- focused agricultural interventions are carried out. Chapter 6focuses on the institutional issues related to the operationalizing agricultural development strategies that have nutritional objectives, primar- ily at the national level. It maps out the state-level institutions involved with agriculture and nutri- tion and analyzes the barriers that have posed LatinAmerica and the C problems for closer coordination in the past. Chapter 7draws a set of conclusions as to how agri- All Developing Countries cultural interventions and investments could ac- celerate improvements in nutrition in low- and Source: UNStandingCommitteeon Nutrition2004. middle-income countries. Note: Preschool childrendefined as children underthe age of 5. Determinants of Human Nutrition and the Pathways Linking I Agriculture and Nutrition International development agencieshave beendesigning approaches and programs linking agriculture and nutrition to address the prob- lem of malnutrition since the 1960s.The conventional link has been from agriculture to foodsecurity.The lack of an explicit indicator of food security led to the use of anthropometric indicators to measure nutritional status. Yet these indicators capturefar more than food se- curity as illustrated in a conceptual framework of nutrition devel- oped by UNICEF (UNICEF1990),(Figure5). Food security is just one underlying determinant of nutrition, along with the quality of maternal and child care, the adequacy and use of preventive and curative health services,and whether individ- uals areliving in a healthy environment. Themore immediate deter- minants of nutritional statusaredietary intake and health status.The focus of this report is on the connection between agricultural pro- duction and dietary intake via food security. In the 1970sfoodprice spikesprompted alarm and concernsabout food availability and brought the term "food security" into the de- velopment arena.Programsoperated under an assumption that agri- culture's primary rolein thisequation was to address protein-energy deficienciesby increasingfood production and lowering food prices. During the Green Revolution the availability of staple cereals in- creased globally and prices fell proportionately, yet protein-energy malnutrition persisted. Publicationson agriculture-nutritionlinkages became critical of what appeared to be an implicit assumption that improved nutrition would follow naturally from the gains achieved through production increases.Box 1lists the key messagestoemerge from thesepublications during thisperiod and afterward. In 1981the World Bank commissioned a report by Per Pinstrup- Andersen titled Nutritional Consequences of Agricultural Projects: Conceptual Relationships and Assessment Approaches, which argued that if agricultural development was tobetter contribute toimproving nu- trition,nutritional aimswould have tobe explicitlyincorporated into agricultural production decisions. Amartya Sen's work on famines and the concept of entitlements, together with the failure to achieve real improvements in nutritional outcomes,led food security practi- tioners to shift their attention toimproving poor households' income and their economic accessto food. 10 From Agriculture to Nutrition: Palhways, Synergies, and Outcomes The change was reflected by the messages in alleviating micronutrient malnutrition, includ- emerging from publications produced in the early ing through emerging technologiessuch as biofor- 1990s(box1).In particular, the nutritional implica- tification (Bouis 2000). This reflected a shift in tionsof agricultural commercialization(mainlythe emphasis in nutrition programs in general. "Food- shift to cash cropping) were examined. Studies based" strategies were developed to promote mi- found that even when commercial agricultural cronutrient intake, such as through homestead schemes increased income, they did not substan- gardening. At the same time the food security def- tially improve child nutrition status, leading to the inition evolved from a focus on availability and conclusion that income alone could not solve mal- economic access to include food utilization, en- nutrition. In the nutrition community, meanwhile, compassing diet quality and care issues. This cul- there was a distinct shift in the late 1990s away minated in the 1996World Food Summit definition from the concept of agriculture as an intervention of food security: to reduce energy deficiency and increase income and toward the importance of addressing mi- Food security exists when all people, at all cronutrient deficiencies through agriculture. A times, have physical and economic access to conference held in the Philippines in 1999, sufficient, safe and nutritious food to meet improving Human Nutrition throughAgriculture: The their dietary needs and food preferences for Role oflnternational Agricultural Research, brought an active and healthy life. together nutritionists and agricultural scientists to assessthe role that agricultural research could play World Food SummitPlan of Action Determinants of Human Nutrition and the Pathways Linking Agriculture and Nutrition 1 1 12 From Agriculture to Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies, and Outcomes Yet eventoday theconceptionof "food security" help improve nutrition by reducing diarrheal dis- employedby the agriculturalcommunityoftenne- eases.Thesebroaderlinksbetweenagricultureand glects thenutritionalaspectsof this more complete healtharebeyond the scopeof this report but were definition and in so doing misses important op- discussed in a recent study by the International portunities to contribute to improved nutrition Food Policy Research Institute and a specialjour- outcomes.This persistent neglect was a driver in nal issue on agriculture and health linkages undertaking the work leading to this report. The (Hawkesand Rue12006a;Hawkeset al.2007). 1990s also marked a shift to greater focus on Five pathways linking agriculture with food women, includingintrahouseholdresource alloca- consumption and human nutrition along the tion issues in agriculture and income control and foodsupply chain are described below: caregiving.In theearly2000seffortsfocusedon the Increased consumption from increased food roleof womenand ontheimportanceofcombining production agricultureinterventionswith nutrition education Increasedincomefromthesaleof agricultural and behavior change to maximize their impact on commodities nutrition @ox1).These complementaryinterven- Increased empowermentof women as agents tions and their focus on empowering women had instrumentalto improvedhouseholdfood se- the objectiveof not only increasing food availabil- curity and health and nutrition outcomes ity and access, but also of ensuring appropriate Reductionsinrealfoodpricesassociatedwith child-feeding, childcare, and health-seeking prac- increased food supply tices to improve nutritionaloutcomes. Agriculturalgrowth,leadingto increased na- tional income and macroeconomic growth PATHWAYS LINKING and to poverty reduction and improved nu- AGRICULTURETO NUTRITION tritionoutcomes There are several pathways through which agri- The pathways are archetypal, representing culture can contribute to improved nutrition. The model forms that in reality are by no means self- agriculture-to-nutrition pathways can be charac- contained or mutually exclusive.Subsistencepro- terized alonga continuumbetween themost direct duction, for instance, generally takes place and the least direct, the most direct being charac- alongsideproduction for sale because few house- teristic of subsistenceproduction, the least direct holdsareself-sufficientin food and because food is reflectingthemacroeconomiceffectsof agricultural not theonly requirementthat mustbe met.Income growth on national-and indeed global-popula- is therefore very important even among house- tions. Particularly in the case of households that holds that produce principally for their own con- produce principally for their own consumption, sumption. The income and price pathways are food and nutrient consumptionis directly affected likewise overlapping in that the price reductions by the specific foods the households themselves resulting from increased food supply are given in produce. This relationship becomes more and real terms and as suchserve to raise real income. morecomplexasproductionbecomesmoremarket Pathway 1: Increased consumption from increased oriented. food production (production-for-own-consumption). In Agriculturecan alsoaffectnutrition through af- cases in which the degree of market orientationis fecting health in general. Good nutrition is intu- low, food consumption is strongly influenced by itively a precondition for good health, but the the level and pattern of agricultural production. relationshipruns both ways. Good health is also a Theresourceendowmentsof thehouseholds(such precondition forgood nutrition,enablingpeopleto as land and labor) along with the available tech- metabolize the nutrients they digest.Thus, if agri- nology determinethe levelof production of differ- culturalinterventionssupport positive health out- ent crops, which, in turn, affects the consumption comes-by providing conditionsconduciveto the patterns of the households. This agriculture-con- reduction of infectiousdiseases, for instance-nu- sumption linkage is particularly relevant in the tritionoutcomescanbe improved.Agriculturalin- caseof subsistenceor semisubsistencehouseholds. terventionsto improve food safety and reduce the Increasesin production can lead to greater food incidenceof food-bornediseasescan, for example, availability and consumption at the household nts of Human Nutritionand the Pathways LinkingAgriculture and Nutrition 13 level. This, in turn, can increase the food intake of improve the micronutrient content of their diet, young children, who are most at risk of malnutri- without necessarily increasing energy intakes. Of tion, assuming that intrahousehold allocation of course, the extent of the nutritional benefits relies food is equitable and takes into account their par- on the nutrient content of the higher-value substi- ticularneeds. The type of foodproduced influences tute food;but it also relies on how well the substi- whether increases in production will affectmostly tutes offset existing nutritional deficits within the diet quantity (energy intakes) or diet quality (mi- household. The distribution of different types of cronutrient intakes). Staple foods can contribute foodamong differentindividuals in thehousehold, significantly to alleviating energy (calorie) gaps, and among the more nutritionally vulnerable indi- whereas fruits and vegetables, dairy, eggs, fish, viduals in particular, is also a vital determinant of and meat products can make key contributions to nutrition outcomes. The distribution of nutrition alleviating gapsin essentialmicronutrients such as and other health-related benefits in the household iron, zinc,and vitaminA.Animal source foods and is a function of often complex decision-making fruits and vegetables make staple foods more processes strongly determined by culture and tra- palatable, thus leading to overall greater food in- ditions.Thepeople with the greatest influenceover take.Animal source foods themselves are also rich these decisionstend to be thosewho controlhouse- sourcesof energy and protein. Someproportion of hold resources. In the production-for-own-con- the food produced may very well be intended for sumption scenario, these resources center on salein localmarkets.Somehouseholdsmay, for in- control over the household's basic resource en- stance, meet their staplesrequirements themselves dowment of land, labor, and capital. In the pro- while depending on markets for other products duction-for-income scenario, the most important such as fruits and vegetables. Others may rely resource tends to be income, and the most impor- mainly on home gardens for fruits and vegetables. tant decisionmakers are those who control income Whatever role production-for-income plays in this flows. Thus who controls the income is critical- scenario is secondary to the principal purpose of and in part explains why women are so vital in in- producing food for the household's own food re- fluencing the pathway between agriculture and quirements. nutrition. Pathzuay 2: Increased incomefrom the sale of agri- Pathway 3: Empowerment of women agriculturists. cultural commodities (productionfor-income). As the Studies from Africa, Asia, and Latin America market orientation of agricultural households in- clearly show that women's income-and level of creases, the "production-for-own-consumption" control over income-has a significantly greater pathway just described declines in significance. positive effect on child nutrition and household Rather, incomefrom thesaleof surplusproduction food security than income controlled by men now assumes a primary role, while production for (Quisumbinget al. 1995;Katz 1994;Hoddinott and the household's own consumption becomes sup- Haddad 1994). Women have consistently been plemental. And, rather than desirability for con- shown tobe more likely than men to investin their sumption, ability to sell becomes a principal children's health, nutrition, and education. Thus, criterion influencing the foodsproduced.Increases agricultural interventions that increase women's in income can in turn translate into improvements income and their control over resources can dra- in household food security and food consumption matically increase the potential for positive child as well as individual food intakes. nutrition outcomes and health outcomes. The pos- However, additional income often has little or itive effects of increases in women's income on no effect on energy intakes because households childhood nutrition moreover appear most pro- tend to shift their consumptionto purchase higher- nounced among the lowest income groups. quality, more expensive foods that do not neces- In their roles as agricultural producers and sarilyprovide more energy.Staplefood producers, income earners, as well as in their roles as care- for instance, may use the income earned from the givers, women who are reached by communica- saleof their produce tobuy fruits,vegetables,meat, tion and education services that relay information and fish,and their households may consume these on health and nutrition issues appear to be partic- as substitutes for some proportion of the staples ularly effectiveagents in delivering improved nu- they consume. This substitution may significantly trition outcomes. These roles include child and 14 FromAgriculture lo Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies, and Outcomes elder care, food production, food preparation, Pathzilay 5: Macroeconomic grozilth arising from water collection, and a variety of income-generat- agricultural growth. Agricultural growth can theo- ing activities, all of which have the potential to retically lead to broad improvements in nutrition contribute to improved nutrition. Thus, the incor- simply by virtue of its contributions to macroeco- poration of a gender equity dimension in agricul- nomic growth and national income. Increases in ture programs and the consideration of women's agricultural productivity have been and remain multiple roles and constraints must be addressed important drivers of sustained economic growth, for agricultural programs to achieve positive nu- particularly among countries in relatively early trition impacts. phases of economic development. Some evidence Pathway 4: Lower realfood prices resultingfronr in- suggests that the growth in production results in creasedfood production. Increased food production lower food prices, higher real wages, and a related can reduce food prices, thereby raising the real in- reduction in poverty rates. In theory, asoutlined in come of people who purchase this food in the the food price pathway described above, reduced marketplace. Food prices are also affected by na- food prices allow greater access to food, resulting tional food availability, which isa reflectionof im- in better nutrition for the general workforce while ports and exports as well as production. Lower also freeing additional household resources from food prices, in turn, can increase household food food and other expenditures, to savings and pro- security and raise energy and micronutrient con- ductive investments. Recent evidence confirms sumption. that growth in agricultural productivity is impor- Changes in food prices are largely driven by tant for poverty reduction. A cross-country analy- changes in the technologies and marketing chan- sis published in 2002 found that a 1 percent nels employed by producers. Together, changes in increase in agricultural yields effectively decreases technologiesand markets affectthe costof produc- the percentage of a country's population living on tion and, often (but not always),consumer prices. less than a dollar a day by 0.64 percent to 0.91per- Lower retail prices are likely to benefit consumers cent, with a slightly higher reduction for African more than the agricultural households selling the countries (Thirtleet al.2002).Overall,however, the food,but even so, the impact of lower prices on the economic growth-to-malnutrition relationship is net incomesof the agricultural households will de- modest. A doubling of gross national product pend on new costs of production and the elasticity (GNP)per capita in developing countries has been of demand.Themost common example of this link associated with a much more modest reduction in is the effect of Green Revolution technologies on childhood undernutrition--on the order of only 23 theprice of grains. to 32 percent (Haddadet al. 2003). The Impact of Agriculture Interventions Outlined in the previous chapter are the potential pathways link- ing agriculture and nutrition. But what is the evidence documenting the actual contribution that agriculture has made to nutrition out- comes via these pathways? This chapter reviews this evidence, fo- cusing on the first three pathways: increased consumption from increased food production, increased income from the sale of agri- cultural commodities, and empowerment of women agriculturists. Identifying evidenceon the latter two pathways-the effectof lower food prices and agricultural growth-proved much more difficult, given that there is little documentation of the nutrition outcomes of these changes at the household or individual level. The review is based on a systematic search of recently published literature and a limited searchof unpublished documents, as well as personal contactswith projectofficersand international agencystaff. The search centered on studies of agriculture interventions that had evaluated individual-level nutrition outcomes, such as child nutri- tional status, individual food or nutrient intakes, and diet q~ality.~It drew on previous reviews (Peduzzi 1990;Soleriet al. 1991a,1991b; Gillespieand Mason 1994;Rue12001; and Berti et al. 2004) with the purpose of updating and expanding on them. Much of the analysis related to animal source foods was taken from Leroy and Frongillo (forthcoming). A description of search methods and results is pro- vided in the appendix. "Interventions" aredefined broadly to mean changespurposefully introduced into an existingagriculturesystem to promote new tech- nologies, management practices, production and marketing meth- ods, and other aims that may or may not include components designed to improve nutrition. Thosethat do entail explicit nutrition objectivesare emphasized in this report because these interventions are more likely to document nutrition outcomes. The nutrition out- comes themselvesare treated in terms of the following. Household-level food consumption, which includes household- level consumption of foods and food groups, or energy (calo- ries),and household expenditure on foods and food groups 2 Other typesof agriculturalinterventions,suchas~ ~ o ~ ~cropsoroil seed cropsor f o o d technology-basedrather thancrop-based interventions, were excluded from the re- view because they typically fail to examine nutrition impact. 16 From Agriculture to Nutrilion: Pathways, Synergies, and Outcomes Individtlal food and nutrient intake, which in- prevailing idea that energy intakes were the pri- cludes intakes of macro- and micronutrients mary constraint in the diets of the poor (McClaren and of foods rich in specific micronutrients 1974; Waterlow and Payne 1975). Still, shifts to- that are the focus of interventions such as ward more diversified diets were documented in those addressing vitamin A and iron defi- instances in which they occurred. These studies ciencies also reported results disaggregated by income Nutrition status, whichincludesanthropomet- group and examined the role of control of income ric indicators, such as height, weight, and by women as opposed to men. body mass index, and micronutrient-specific Results from these and closely related studies indicators,such as serum retinol (indicatorof were synthesized, yielding a series of conclusions vitamin A status) and hemoglobin (indicator that are summarized in table 2 (DeWalt 1993; of iron status) Kennedyet al.1992;von Braun and Kennedy 1994). Theprincipalresults did not differsubstantiallybe- tween casestudies of the commercializationof sta- THE NUTRITIONAL IMPACTS OF ple foodcrops versus other cashcrops. In sum, the case studies documented fairly consistentpositive AGRICULTURAL IN'TERVENTIONS impacts on focus crop production, household in- Interventions involving staplefoods. Theonly agricul- come, and food expenditures, but no substantial tural interventionsinvolvingstaple foodsthat have impactson young childnutritionalstatus (themain been evaluated from a nutritional perspectivecon- indicator assessed across studies). In one case in cern agricultural commercialization-the conver- which subsistencefood production was not main- sion from staple subsistence food production to tained, outcomes were worse. DeWalt (1993)con- commercialfood production. Although the evalua- cluded that a focus on commercialization per se tions had assessment of impacts on nutrition out- was misplacedand that impactson food consump- comesas an objective, theinterventions themselves tion and child nutrition were determined by con- were not designed to affect child nutritional status trol of production and income, allocation of per se; objectiveswere more general and aimed at household labor, maintenance of subsistence pro- increasing food production incomes for farm duction, land tenure, and pricing policies for both households, or both. The evaluations thus mea- foodand nonfood crops.Kennedy et al. (1992)also sured the interventions' impact on nutrition out- attributed the lack of impact on child nutritional comesthrough theproduction-for-incomepathway status to the generallyhigh levels of morbidity ob- (indirectly, agricultural commercialization may served in project areas. also have had indirect effects through the agricul- Overall, the authors made the following nu- tural growth and price pathways). trition-related conclusions: Someearly conceptual reviewsof linksbetween Generally,participation in cash-cropschemes agricultural commercialization and nutrition had resulted in increased household income. suggested the potential for negative impacts, al- Increases in income were accompanied by though some of these examples related to conver- increases in food expenditures, but impacts sion to nonfood crops (Fleuret and Fleuret 1980). on consumption were also dependent on One early review showed mixed effects on nutri- changes in relative prices. tion, some negative and some positive, but also Dietary energy intakes increased in most identified methodological issues that constrained casesbut decreased insome,as foodexpendi- interpretation and comparison (von Braun and tures shifted to more expensive items such as Kennedy 1986).Given these uncertainties, the au- meat and fruits; potential improvements in thors designed and undertook a series of mi- diet quality were suggested but not quantita- crolevel case studies that included assessment of tively assessed. nutrition outcomes as an explicit objective (von Increases in women's income were docu- Braun and Kennedy 1994).The study's focus was mented in some studies and were generally on the impact of commercializationon energy in- linked to increases in household energy con- takes rather than on diet quality or micronutrient sumption; this effect was most pronounced intake and was therefore consistent with the then- among the lowest income groups. The Impact of AgricultureInterventionson Nutrition Outcomes 17 18 From Agriculture to Nutrition: Pathways,Synergies, and Outcomes The I m ~ a cof Aariculture Interventions on Nutrition Outcomes l 19 20 From Agriculture to Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies, and Outcomes Overall, participation in cash-cropping starting with the VITAL reviews and then reviews schemes did not have a significantimpact- by Gillespie and Mason (1994), Ruel (2001),and negative or positive-n young child nutri- Berti et al. (2004). tional status. In 1990and 1991the USAID-funded Vitamin A Children's morbidity levels were generally Field Support Project (VITAL) carried out an as- high and not affected by the schemes and sessment of past and then-current household gar- were interpreted to be a major constraint to den interventions and their impacts on nutrition improving child nutritional status. outcomes. The aim was to inform the planning of future research and initiatives.Focusing on the ef- Evidence from this set of studies suggests that fectsofhomesteadgardenson theintake ofvitamin cash cropping was often associated with greater A-rich foods and improving vitamin A status, the household income, including, in some cases, review yielded a number of recommendations on greater income controlled by women, as well as design, targeting, and evaluation of homestead greater food expenditures. This usually translated into greater household-level energy intake, but gardens as a means of strengthening their nutri- tional impact. Themain recommendation was that sometimes households shifted to more expensive interventions should focuson women (throughthe sources of energy.When this shift occurred,itmay female empowerment pathway) and provide nu- have resulted in greater dietary diversity, which is generally a sign of improved overall diet quality, trition education services to promote appropriate but the studies did not specifically assess this as- processing, storage, and cookingtechniques of vit- pect. Impacts on child nutritional status were lim- amin A-rich foods.They should alsopromote a di- ited and mixed. The studies thereforesuggest that verse variety of vitamin A-rich foods to meet both although agricultural interventions that promote subsistenceand marketing needs and take into ac- commercializationmay effectively increaseincome count cultural preferences when foods to be intro- and food expenditures, they are not sufficient to duced are selected. improve childhood nutrition if they are not com- A review by Gillespieand Mason published in plemented by interventions that specifically ad- 1994considered 13programs aimed at improving dressother determinants ofchild nutrition such as diet quality, seven of which included homestead improved health, diet quality, child feeding, and gardening. Four of these were combined with so- other caregivingpractices. cial marketing activities, and all four exhibited a interventions involving fruits and vegetables. number of indirect benefits such as increasing Despite the existenceof a wide variety of fruitand women's income and social status. Yet only one vegetable production systems, only homestead project, carried out in Bangladesh, showed a posi- garden production systems have been imple- tive effect on vitamin A status in addition to in- mented and evaluated with an explicit nutrition creased energy intakes and improvements in the objective.Theseprimarily target the firstpathway, economicstatusof women.A summaryof theeval- increasingown production for consumption, with uation findings of horticultural and nutrition pro- a secondary pathway of income increases from jects is presented in table 3. salesof higher-value products. The results of more recent evaluations included Homestead gardens take a wide variety of in the reviews by Ruel (2001)and Berti et al. (2004) forms, in backyards, farmyards, kitchens, contain- are summarized in table 3. The Ruel review pub- ers, smallpatches of availableland, vacant lots, on lished in 2001found that the interventions that did rooftops and tabletops, and along roadsides and not include a nutrition education component (gen- the edges of fields. They are generally close to a erally those conducted beforethe mid-1990s)failed house and source of water and are managed by to achieve significant impacts on nutritional out- familymembers usinglow-costinputs.Their prod- comes.Subsequentinterventions that incorporated ucts include fruits, vegetables, herbs, condiments, education, socialmarketing, and mass media cam- and sometimessecondary stapleslikelegumes and paigns together with homestead garden initiatives sweet potatoes, most of which are grown for did demonstrate impacts. The main conclusionof household consumption. The nutrition impacts of the review was that homestead gardening com- homestead gardens have been relatively well doc- bined with effective promotional and educational umented. This sectiondraws on previous reviews, interventionshave the potential to improve the nu- The Impact of Agriculrure Interventionson Nutrition Outcomes 21 22 From Agriculture to Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies, and Outcomes 24 FromAgriculture to Nutrition:Pathways, Synergies,and outcomes tritional statusofpopulations-but thathomestead creased income, including increased income gardening aloneis much lesslikely to improvenu- among women agriculturists. Most of the studies trition. The review also emphasizes that using a showed a positive impact onproduction ofanimal gender-sensitiveapproach toagriculturalinterven- source foods, despite the large variability of pro- tions could strengthen their impacton nutrition. motional interventions. Similarly, most interven- The review published by Berti and colleaguesin tions that measured income or expenditures also 2004 used a sustainable livelihoodsframework to reported increases in these indicators. assess whether different agriculturalinterventions However, impacts on dietary intake and nutri- investindifferenttypesof capital:human,physical, tional status showed mixed results. For aquacul- social, environmental,and financial.Interventions ture interventions, one intervention may have that investmorebroadly invarious typesof capital, actuallydecreaseddietary qualitybecause it led to as is usually the case with homestead gardening a switchfromconsumptionofsmallfish(whichare programs, tended to have a greater impact on nu- consumed whole and contain high levels of cal- tritionthan those that focusmorenarrowlyon agri- cium and vitamin A) to greater consumption of culture.Theauthors concluded that theagricultural largerfishwithpoorer micronutrientdensity(Roos interventionsmost likely to be successfulinvest in et al.2003; Bouiset al. 1998).In another, there were natural, physical, social (includinggender consid- no differencesin total fish consumption between erations),human (especiallynutrition education), the fish-producingand non-fish-producinghouse- and financialcapital. holds (Rooset al. 2003).In a third study, interven- The2001and 2004 reviewsled toa commoncon- tionhouseholds appeared tohaveconsumed more clusionthat homesteadgardeningprojects after the fish,but the analyseswere not subject to statistical mid-1990s were successful if they incorporated testing (Thompsonet al. 2000). human capital-related components, notably com- Similarlymixed resultswere found for dairy in- munication and nutrition education activitiestar- terventions. In one intervention in India, house- geting behavior change among their audiences, holds in villages with milk cooperatives actually and the incorporationof gender considerations in consumed less milk than households in villages project design. The power of nutrition education without cooperatives. The overall nutrient con- has been identified in other studies. Block (2003), sumption of households with cowsin intervention for example, demonstrated that nutrition knowl- villages did, however, rise, whereas nutrient con- edge is a key determinant in how household food sumption among nonproducing households fell budgets are allocated. Households with nutrition (Alderman 1987).In another intervention in India, knowledge allocate substantially larger shares of children in households that produced more than 5 their household food budgets to foods rich in mi- litersof milk per day had adequate dietary protein cronutrients and are unwilling to reduce con- intake, although none of the groups met their en- sumption when staple food prices increase. This ergy requirements(Begum1994).A third interven- impact is not due to maternal schooling per se, tion in East Africa found that households with which has been independently demonstrated to crossbred cows consumed more energy, fat, pro- improvechild nutrition outcomes. tein, retinol, and iron than nonadopters, and in Intervenfioru involving animal sourcefoods. Leroy Kenya,womenparticipatingin theinterventionre- and Frongillo(forthcoming)reviewed 15interven- ported increased milk consumption (Ahmedet al. tion studies on animalsourcefoods,including4 on 2000;Mullins et al. 1996). aquaculture, 5 on dairy production, 3 on poultry, Poultry interventions in Bangladesh and Egypt and 3 in whichlivestock production was one com- saw higher intakes of a range of nutrients among ponent of larger integrated projects.The findings participating households than among nonpartici- concerning theimpactsof these studiesonproduc- pating households (Gala1et al.1987;Nielsen 1996). tion,incomeand expenditure, women's status,and Another poultry intervention in Bangladesh did dietary intake and nutritional status are summa- not lead to increasedegg or chickenconsumption, rizedin table4, together with additional studiesre- but participating households did eat more fish, viewed for thisreport. Thestudiescover severalof suggesting that the intervention led to increased the pathways outlined in chapter 2, including in- incomeand subsequentdietary change (Nielsenet creased production of own consumption and in- al. 2003). The Impact of Agriculture Interventionson Nulrition Outcomes 25 26 From Agriculture to Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies, and Outcomes 28 From Agricultureto Nutrition: Pathways,Synergies, and Outcomes The lm~actof Agriculture Interventionson Nutrition Outcomes 29 30 FromAgriculture to Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies, and Outcomes Three of the interventions focusing on animal women's status and their and control over income sourcefoodsincorporated nutrition education and are criticalto improved nutrition outcomes. were combined with fruit and vegetable produc- Yet women farmers face a series of constraints tion (see "mixed interventions" in table 4). In that limit their potential as agricultural producers Ethiopia,children in participating households had and their controlof theresourcesthat flowfrom the slightly more diverse diets and were significantly adoption of new technologies. The constraints are morelikely todrink milk fourormore timesa week well-documented and include weak land rights, (Ayalewet al. 1999a;Habtemariam et al. 2003). In limited accessto common property resources,lack Vietnam the interventiongroup had higher intakes of equipmentand appropriate technology, limited of vegetables, fruits, energy, protein, vitamin A, contact with agricultural extension, lack of access and iron and exhibitedhigher growth rates among to credit, and lower levels of education children (Englishet al.1997).It isnot clear whether (Quisumbing et al. 1995).All of these constraints the animal production caused the positive effects conspire to substantially lower the productivity of because the interventions were multifactorial. In women farmers, resulting in high opportunity Thailand, vitamin A intake increased in the inter- costs for households and communities (Alderman vention and the control groups, but the increase et al. 1995;Quisumbing- et al. 1998). was greater in the intervention group (Smitasiri Effortsto ensure that women benefit from agri- and Dhanamitta 1999). cultural development interventions canbebroadly Leroy and Frongillo (forthcoming) concluded classifiedinto three types of approaches: "women- that the interventions associatedwith marked im- only" projects, projects targeted to both women provement in dietary intake and nutritional status and men but with someresourcesallocatedspecif- had one of two key characteristics:either women ically for women, and projectsin which gender is- played a critical role in the intervention or the in- sues are fully "mainstreamed." A review of the terventions included a nutrition education compo- evidenceby Pena et al. (1996)found that the third nent. The conclusionwas consistent with those of approach is the most likely to improve women's earlier reviews,such as Rue1(2001).Theonly well- status in a sustainable way. conducted study to contradict these conclusions Interventions that seek to increase women's ac- was a studyon the dairy cooperativesinIndia dur- cess to or ownership and control of resources are ing the 1980s(Alderman 1987). generallyquitecomplex.Failure to understandcul- The authors note that an important question tural norms and the gender dynamics within the only partially answered in the reviewed studies householdcanresult in unanticipated outcomes.In the Gambia, for example, a project geared to in- was whether the reported increases in consump- creasing women's rice production was so success- tion were a direct effectof increased production or ful that the land it was grown on was reclassified an indirect effect of increased income. For exam- internally within the household. This resulted in ple, Alderman (1987)found that the increased nu- output from that land being sold by men as op- trient consumption of milk-producing households posed to women. Women thereforelost their orig- was not due to an increase in milk consumption, inal income stream, but did retain an increased and so was likely to have come through the in- labor commitment (Dey 1981). Vegetables and comepathway. legumes are often regarded as women's crops. Recognizing this, a project in Togo was successful GENDER OUTCOMES OF because it promoted the introduction of soybeans AGRICULTURAL INTERVENTIONS as a legume rather than as a cash crop. Promotion as a cash crop would have resulted in the crop The role of women farmers has received much at- switching to male control. tention in the past few decades. In 1995 the UN The review in preparation by Leroy and Food and Agriculture Organization estimated that Frongillo (forthcoming) of interventions promot- women provide more than half the labor required ing the production of animal source foods also as- for food production in the developing world and sessed their impact on maternal income or that thisproportion isevenhigher inAfrica.Thisis women's control over income. The results were important from a nutritional perspective because quite mixed.For example, an intervention involv- The Impact of Agriculture Interventionson Nutrition Outcomes 31 ingintensifieddairy farminginKenya showed that increased production into increased household an important share of the additional income was consumption and individual intakes. controlled by women, whereas in Ethiopia men's Overall, the review documented a wide range incomesbenefited significantlymore from intensi- of agricultural interventions that have con- fied dairying than did women's (Mullins et al. tributed to improved nutrition outcomes. In most 1996;Tangka etal. 1999).Overall,the reviewfound cases, however, the exact pathways by which im- that whether women's income is likely to increase pacts on nutrition havebeen achieved aredifficult depends on the livestock or aquaculture produc- to track. The reason is that studies document im- tionsystem, thenatureof the intervention,and cul- pacts on several intermediary outcomes such as tural beliefs and practices relating to gender.Even food security, income, or women's empower- if the intervention is targeted to women's livestock ment, but without directly modeling these path- and aquaculture activities, women may lose con- ways of impact to nutrition outcomes. Because trol over the incomegenerated by those activities. these outcomes are soclosely intertwined, it is im- The authors also noted that women's livestock possible to determine from this literature the rel- ownership rights may not be as stable as men's. In ative importance of the different pathways general,stress and constraints lead to an erosionof linking agriculture and nutrition. women's ownership rights becausewomen's own- It is also clear that agricultural interventions ership of livestockisoftenconsidered a "secondary have not always been successful in improving nu- right." Evidencefrom around the world showsthat trition outcomes. For instance,although all the an- imal source food interventions reviewed were the rights of pastoral women and theircontrolover successful in increasing production of animal livestock management and marketing are being sourcefoods,many failedtoimprovenutrition out- eroded (Niamir-Fuller1994). comes. That is becauseproduction alone is insuffi- The authors concluded that women's control cient to bring about improved nutrition if it does over income from livestock production activities not simultaneously address--or is complemented is very site- and production system-specific. by other interventions that address-ther deter- Livestock provides a real opportunity for women minants of nutrition such as improved healthcare. to increase their income in some situations. In Agricultural interventions thus cannotbe expected other situations,however, it merely leads to a sig- to achieve impacts on nutrition outcomes unless nificant increase in women's workload without a they are integrated with complementary efforts to considerable effect on their control over the addi- address other issues such as high levelsof morbid- tional resources. This conclusion is most likely ity and inappropriate child-feedingpractices. also applicable to other types of food production The review of evidence presented above sug- systems. gests a number of general lessons about how agri- cultural interventions can be designed to aclueve LESSONS LEARNED nutrition-related objectives. Most of these lessons pertain toprocessesand general approaches rather During the past 30 years development researchers than packages of specificcomponents and should and practitioners have generated substantial new be considered by planners when devising more information and insights into the best strategies strategic approaches to nutritional goals: for ensuring that agricultural interventions reach Follow an integrativeprocess of planning a~ldimple- the poor, improve welfare, and have a positive mentation. Successfulinterventionsusually incorpo- impact on nutrition outcomes. Production is rate both agricultural and nutrition considerations clearly an essential component of these interven- at all phases of planning. Intervention activities tions. The nature of the intervention will deter- should be integrated with other health and devel- mine the effect on macro- or micronutrient opment services and should work in partnership supply:staple crops, for instance, can increase en- with differentactorsin the field. ergy, whereas animal source foods can increase Take local agricultural and nutrition contexts into protein and micronutrients such as iron and vita- account, and seek opportunities to build relation- min A. But the special challenge of integrated ships with local partners that are intimately famil- agricultural-nutrition interventions is to translate iar with these contexts. Successful interventions 32 From Agriculture to Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies, and Outcomes often work with local groups and organizations- decision-making power directly affect the nutri- often nongovernmental organizations-that are tional status of their children. well placed to engageand consult with farmersas lncorporate communication and education compo- participants in designinginterventionsand devel- nents that target behavior change. Interventions that oping or adapting technologies.These local coun- successfully translate increased production into terparts can be especially valuable in identifying better nutrition outcomes, especially for children, opportunities to relate the interventionwith exist- usually incorporatecommunicationstrategiesthat ingprogramsand tointegrateinterventioncompo- relate the significance of positive or negative be- nentsintothoseprograms.Theseopportunitiescan haviorstohealthand nutrition effects.Information be important, and capitalizing on them can yield is a vital resource, and households that are positive effectsontheintervention'ssustainability. equipped with an understanding of nutrition-and Successfulgardeninginterventionsareanexcellent health-related information display a tendency to- example. Those which have carefully considered ward more favorableallocationof food and health traditional gardening practices and the goals and budgets. Raising awareness of the health benefits preferences behind gardeners' production deci- of a newly availablefood commodity, one for in- sions have a distinct advantage. Highly relevant, stance that addresses a prevalentlocal micronutri- adaptive, and sustainable changes can be intro- ent deficiency, may be an important factor in its duced by identifying and making available im- adoptionamongproducers,includingthose grow- provements that satisfy the gardeners, using the ing food for their own households' consumption. gardeners' own criteria and accountingfor and ac- The importanceof educationalcomponentsis per- commodatingthegardeners' ownpriorities, incen- haps most pronounced among mothers, whose tives, vulnerabilities, assets, constraints, and roles as caregiversextend to other,nonfood deter- livelihood strategies.This requires a trusting, col- minants of nutrition, such as hygiene and sanita- laborative relationship between the researcher or tion practices and preventive and curative health. project personnel and the participating commu- Armed with sufficientinformation, they aremore- nity-a relationshipinwhich theproject personnel over more likely to know when it is necessary to arenecessarily attentiveand sensitivelistenersand availhouseholdmembers of health services. in which the community knows that its concerns Monitor and evaluate progress. Interventionswith havebeenaddressed.Localengagementisalsoim- sustainableimpactsare generallycharacterizedby portant inensuringthat thescopeandcausesof nu- effective monitoring and feedback loops that en- trition problems among targeted groups are ableresponsiveness to the shiftingrealitiespartici- accurately identified.The importance of local en- pants face. The nutrition-related objectives gagement suggests that a suitable approach in- pursued by the agriculturalinterventionwill most cludes investingin pilot studies before large-scale likely remain unchanged, but the factors that act programs are initiated and then incorporating upon that objective may very well be in flux. what is learned about the existing conditions,cli- Changing livelihood strategies may be a particu- mate, and localculture. larly important set of developments to track, and Mainstream gender. Women play multiple roles here too, monitoring is likely to benefit consider- inboth agriculturalproduction and nutrition, and ably fromgood rapport between project personnel interventions that consider trade-offs between and participants. their respectiverolesand their timeand labor con- Taken together, theselessonsshow that agricul- straints are more likely to lead to positive out- tural interventions are most likely to have an im- comes.Successfulinterventions aremorelikely to pact on nutrition outcomes when they involve take into account the range of factors that differ- diverse and complementaryprocesses and strate- entially enable or constrain men and women in gies that redirect the focusbeyond agriculturefor terms of access to resourceslikeland and services food productionand toward broaderconsideration like credit. These influence and often determine of livelihoods and optimal intrahousehold use of their roles as decision makers in the household or resources. Successfulprojects are those that invest community. The significanceof gender equity is broadly in improvinghuman capital and that sus- particularly critical because women's status and tain and increase the livelihood assetsof the poor. The four case studies of agricultural interventionspresented in this chapter,none of which were included in previous reviews, provide insights into new approaches to the agriculture-nutritionnexus. All fourinterventions,explicitlyaimed atintegratingagricultureand nu- trition during planning and implementation, took into account lessonslearned in previous interventionsand documented quantita- tive diet or nutrition outcomes at the individual level. ORANGE-FLESHEDSWEET POTATO PRODUCTIONANDVITAMIN A DEFICIENCY IN MOZAMBIQUE Background.Thefirstcasestudy providesnew insightsinto the use of a new technology,biofortification,as anutrition-focused agricultural intervention.Staplefoods interventionsare generally not viewed as direct routes toward improving nutrition outcomes. This is particu- larly true in the case of primary staples like rice, maize, wheat, and cassava,which aregood sourcesof energybut notof bioavailablemi- cronutrients.Biofortification,the processof breedingfoodcropsthat are rich in bioavailable micronutrients, is attempting to overcome that limitation.One biofortified staple crop-orange-fleshed sweet potato (0FSP)-is alreadybeing widely disseminated,particularlyin Sub-Saharan Africa. Unlike most staple crops, even unimproved OFSP is rich in vitamin A, and efforts to biofortify OFSP have in- cluded selectionandbreedingforstillhigher concentrationsof thevi- tamin Aprecursorsknown ascarotenoids. OFSPhasbeen selectedasafocuscropin anumber of effortstoim- provevitamin Aintakes,including theVitaminA for Africa (VITAA) partnership and the HarvestPlus biofortificationprogram. OFSP is promising for a number of reasons. It contains very high levels of carotenoids;it iswellacceptedby the young childrenwho are usually targeted;and it iseasy to cultivate,isvegetativelypropagated,and is fairlydrought-resistantonceestablished.It isalsoagood sourceof en- ergy for children and adults. Together these qualities make OFSP an excellent food securitycrop. It is also less labor-intensive than most otherstaplecrops,and thisisparticularlyhelpful tolabor-constrained households,such as those affected by HIV/AIDS. It can be planted over abroad range of timewithout considerableyield lossand canfill 34 FromAgriculture to Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies, and Outcomes some seasonal gaps in energy and vitamin A in- Assessingimpact.Evaluationdesign and data col- takes. Finally,prices are generallylow enough that lection. The evaluation employed a prospective, families will choose to keep some OFSP for home quasi-experimental design. The objective was to consumption, rather than sellingall they produce. measure the impact of the intervention on chil- This case study reports on the results of the dren's vitamin A status (using serum retinol) and "Toward Sustainable Nutrition Improvement to document changes in the intermediate factors Project" in Mozambique (Lowet al. 2007a; Low et leading to the nutritional impact, that is,changesin al. 2007b; Low et al. 2005).The project is purpose- knowledge, OFSP production and consumption, fully built on lessons learned from an earlier OFSP and vitamin A intake. Three districts were pur- intervention project in Kenya (Hagenimana et al. posefully selected. Within districts, villages were 2OOl).3Box 2 presents a summary of the program characteristicsand set of interventions and lessons learned. 3. Project website:http://aec.msu.edu/fs2/ts~~i/index.htm Case Studies 35 stratified by distance to servicesand other charac- design limitation was that participation in inter- teristics and randomly selected within strata. vention areaswas restricted to those willing tojoin Within villages, all households with age-eligible farmers' groups, which precluded a full explo- childrenwere invited to participate;in intervention ration of determinants of adoption.Thisalsoraised areas, study participation also entailed participa- thepossibility of a self-selectionbias,but thisthreat tion in local farmers' groups. A series of nine sur- to internal validity was addressed in the analysis. veys were undertaken. Information was gathered In addition, the time frame did not allow an as- on socioeconomicand demographic characteristics sessmentof sustainability.Finally, thispilot project of households, agricultural production, child mor- was relatively small. Nevertheless, the study re- bidity, adult and child anthropometry, parental sults provide "proof of concept" and support the nutrition knowledge, food frequency, dietary in- relevanceand the potential for impact of the larger takes, and biochemical indicators. In addition, VITAA, biofortification, and other efforts. sweet potato plots were measured annually, and Innovations. Theproject took severalsteps to en- market prices were monitored monthly. sureeffectiveimplementation and to maximize the Impact results. The evaluation showed a marked potential for impact of this innovative agriculture decrease in vitamin A deficiency among interven- and nutrition intervention. Key featuresof the pro- tion households, from 60 to percent 38 percent. ject planning and implementation, which are be- That was accompanied by significant changes in lieved to have contributed to its success, include the following: several of the intermediary factors along the im- pact pathway, that is, large increasesin production Integrated agriculture and nutrition compo- of OFSP as well as positive changes in knowledge nents at every stage of planning and imple- about vitamin A and child intake of vitamin A. mentation; Strengths and linzitations oftlze evaluation.Thepri- Established links between researchers and mary strengthsof the evaluation component lay in communitiesthrough implementingpartners; the prospective design and in the comprehensive Identified and selected nutrient-dense vari- seriesof surveys, which documented a wide range eties that also addressed the needs of farmers ofintermediate aswell asfinaloutcomes.Themain and the preferencesof consumers; 36 From Agriculture to Nutrition:Pathwavs,Svnewies.and Outcomes Were grounded in thorough knowledge of dertaken were not necessarilydesigned to measure context; and attribute impacts.Nevertheless, somestudy el- Gavedueconsiderationto therolesof women ements incorporated a quasi-experimental ap- and the constraints they face as farmers; proach, including the use of random sampling for Included strong nutrition education and de- quantitative surveys in intervention and compara- mand creation components, using multiple ble control villages over the life of the project. In channels and targeting multiple audiences; total, 24 research activities were undertaken be- Addressed sustainability through efforts to tween 2000 and 2004, including focus group dis- develop localmarkets for OFSP; cussions, semistructured interviews, participatory Employed quasi-experimentalevaluation de- mapping, indicator development, yield collection sign and gathered detailed data on interme- exercises,soil and biomass sampling,and quantita- diate outcomes to enhance assessment of tive surveyscoveringdietary intakes,anthropome- impact. try, and hemoglobinmeasurement. The qualitative exercisescovereda range of topics, including child careand feeding,legumeexpansion,and thenature LEGUMESYSTEMSAND CHILD of crop residue use and seed exchanges. NUTRITIONIN MALAWI Evaluation results. Box 3 summarizes the results of the study sofar. One notable successisreflected Background. The second case study highlights the by the expansion of farmer participation, which potential fora crop oftenoverlookedasa nutrition- grew from 183farmers in 7villagesin the firstyear focused intervention: legumes. Legumes do not to nearly 3,000 farmers in 77 villages in the fourth provide extremely high quantities of any individ- year. This included a relatively high participation ual micronutrient. But they are good sources of a by women (Bezner Kerr and Chirwa 2004). range of macro- and micronutrients, and they sub- Preliminary results also indicate that the project stantiallyimprove thequality of grain/root/tuber- succeeded in nearly tripling the frequency of based diets, for both young children and other legumeconsumptionby young children,relativeto family members. The incorporation of legume controls (PATHCanada 2004).Further analyses of plant residues can improve soilfertilityand poten- child nutrition outcomes, including anthropomet- tially increase future harvests. For these reasons, ric outcomes, are ongoing (P.Berti, personal com- interventions involving legume systems are being munication).6 implementedby a varietyof organi~ations.~Within Strengths and limitations of the evaluation. the health sector, a number of nutrition education Availabledocumentation did not allow an assess- interventions have aimed to increase young child ment of the evaluation design and sampling. The intake of legumes. Yet there are very few docu- evaluation's strengths lay in its use of rich qualita- mented examplesof agriculturalinterventions that tive information, which provided insights into the focusedonlegumes and that alsorecorded impacts implementation,adoption, and demand forproject on individual diets or nutrition outcomes. One activities. such study is the Soils, Food, and Health Commu- Innovations. Like the OFSP intervention study, nities Study (SFHC) in northern Malawi's Soils this project built on a range of lessons from the Food and Health Communities Project (Kerr and Chirwa 2004).5The SFHCstudy explored whether a legume system intervention could improve soil 4. See, for example, the Collaborative Crop Research Program fertility, food security, and child nutrition (Kerr at http://mcki~ight.ccrp.corneIl.edu/projects/i~~dex.html. 2006; Kerr and Chirwa 2004). This program supports several legume systems projects in Assessing impact. Design and data collection.The Africa (Tanzania, Malawi, and Mozambique) and Latin America (Boliviaand Ecuador)aimed at improving the use SFHC project was designed as a participatory re- of legumes, improvingchildnutrition, orboth. search project introducing legume systems and 5 Web site: http://www.healthbridge.ca/food_soil~e.cm. using an ecosystemframework to examinethe sys- Accessed February27,2007. 6 The project is also continuing in a second phase; see the tems' links with food security and health. Project HealthBridge (formerly PATH Canada) website at documents identify "monitoring change" as an ob- http://www.healthbridge.ca/food-soil-e.cfm for a project jective, and thewide range of research activitiesun- description. Case Studies 37 past. Agricultural and nutrition concerns were in- prising farmers selected by community members, tegrated from the outset. Gender issues and other carried out research along with external team social relations were carefully assessed and ad- members. The methods used to select farmer re- dressed, nutrition education was aimed at ensur- search team members were designed toensure rep- ing impacts on child diets, and a number of resentation of less-advantaged community research elements did allow some monitoring and members, thus addressing an important shortcom- assessment of impacts. Strong participatory and ing experienced by several past efforts in which qualitative approaches wereemployed throughout teams were dominated by men and better-off the life of the project.Farmer research teams, com- household members. 38 From Agriculture to Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies, dnd Outcomes INTEGRATING HOMESTEAD Vegetablesproduced in the demonstration gardens GARDENING A N D PRIMARY were cooked at the Isizinda on days when child growth was monitored (Faberet al. 2002b). HEALTH CARE ACTIVITIES IN Assessing impact: Evaluation design and data col- SOUTH AFRICA lection. Serum retinol concentrations of 165 chil- Background. Thethird case study focuseson yellow dren ages two-five were collected at baseline, and fruits and vegetables, including dark green leafy their food consumption was recorded during a vegetables in South Africaand is a useful example cross-sectional survey covering the intervention of an agricultural intervention that explicitlypart- village. A neighboring village served as a control nered with the health sector. The pilot study was village. One year after implementation, the moth- implemented in 1999in a rural villageinKwazulu- ers of a convenience sample of 100 two- to five- Natal, South Africa, to promote the production of year-old children (50 from households with a these crops at the household level. The project ef- project garden and 50 from households without a fectivelylinked an agriculture intervention with a project garden) were interviewed. Data collected set of health-sector activities to stimulate greater included foodintake from 24-hourrecalls.A cross- consumption of the products. The intervention sectional survey was also organized 20 months package included both an agriculture intervention afterprogram implementation; serum retinol con- and a health-nutrition intervention. centrations of 221 children (110 from the experi- Agricultural intervention. The project provided a mental village and 111 from the control village) course on the theoretical and practical aspects of were measured, along with information on dietary vegetableproduction, suchas soilpreparation, fer- intake and growth of the children, and maternal tilizers, planting and sowing dates, plant spacing, knowledge on vitamin A. irrigation, crop rotation, cultivar choice, weeding, ResuIts of the one-year follow-up revealed that maintenance, pest and disease management, and dietary vitamin A intake increased significantly in harvesting (Faber and Benade 2003). Homestead children from households with a project garden, gardens were present prior to the interventionand and to a lesser extent in children from households included traditional garden crops such as cabbage, without a project garden. Twenty months into im- maize,vitamin A-rich pumpkin, and imifino(acol- plementation, results revealed that after the onset lection of dark-green leaves). A total of nine of the intervention, the number of project gardens demonstration gardens were established with the gradually increased to reach a total of 126gardens followingcrops:butternut squash,carrots,orange- (including demonstration gardens). Only 8 per- fleshed sweet potatoes, and spinach, along with a cent of the households with project gardens sold papaya tree.Thesecropswere new additions to the some proportion of the produce for cash. Between gardens but were already familiar to communities baseline and the 20-month follow-up, there was a in the area through their availability for purchase significant increase in maternal knowledge scores in local markets (Faberet al.2002a). in the experimental village compared with the Health-nutrition intervention. In 1995a commu- control village. nity-based growth-monitoring program was estab- At the same time, significantlymore children in lished in partnership with the health sector. The the intervention village than in the control village program is a primary health care activity run by consumed carrots, pumpkin or butternut squash, nutrition monitors through home-based centers spinach, and imifino-all vitamin A-rich foods. known as Isizinda. Theproject was able to engage From baseline to follow-up, serum retinol concen- the Isizinda as a focal point to promote the local trations increased significantlyin the experimental production and consumptionofprovitamin A-rich village and decreased significantly in the control foods.They alsoserved as agricultural demonstra- village. At follow-up, children from the interven- tion and training centersand asnutrition education tion village had higher serum retinol concentra- centers providing instruction on the relation be- tions than children in the control village; the tween vitamin A and health, the identification of reverse was true atbaseline.Among thechildren in vitamin A-rich foods, and cooking methods. the experimental village, those from households Case Studies 39 without a project garden had significantly lower HOMESTEAD GARDENING FOR serum retinol concentrations than did those from FRUITS,VEGETABLES, AND households with a project garden, and their con- LIVESTOCK INASIA centrations were similar to those of children from the control village. Because all households in the Background. The fourth case study involved home- intervention village were exposed to the same nu- stead gardening for fruits,vegetables, and livestock tritional education and agricultural demonstration in Bangladesh and is notable not only for the range sessions regardless of whether they had a project of commoditiesit dealt with, but alsobecause it is a garden, the finding above suggests that access to rare example of an intervention that was scaled up supply was criticallymore important than was ed- from the community to the national level and was ucation without ready access. ultimately replicatedin other countries. Strengths and limitatiotls of the ez~aliiation.The Homestead gardening in Bangladeshisa mainly home-gardening program had a positive effect on seasonal activity, with about 70 percent of fruits serum retinol concentrations,habitual intake of tar- and vegetables being produced in winter. geted garden crops, and maternal knowledge Vegetableand fruit production satisfieslessthan 30 about nutrition. In addition, villagers appreciated percent of national demand. In an attempt to gain the fact that they no longer had to buy vegetables a better understanding of existing gardening prac- and recognized the health benefitsapparent among tices,Helen Keller International (HKI)conducted a their children. The evaluation did, however, have small assessment in north-west Bangladesh in several weaknesses. The treatment and control 1988.On the basis of the findings, HKI developed groups were not randomized, and the effect of the a pilot program among 1,000households between intervention was assessed using a cross-sectional 1990and 1993.Theaimsof the program were to (1) survey comparing households with and without explore the feasibility of promoting low-cost veg- gardens. Self-selectionof households (i.e.,partici- etable gardens combined with nutrition education pating or not in the garden project) was not con- and (2) identify constraints that might prevent in- trolled for,and forlogisticalreasons, the evaluation creasedproduction and consumption of vitamin A- survey was doneat the beginning of thenew grow- rich foods among poor households. ing season for many crops (20 months), when The pilot program provided a wealth of infor- mostly spinach and carrots are available. Had the mation on the successesand challenges of garden- evaluation been conducted at 24 months, then or- ing programs in Bangladesh and provided Helen ange-fleshed sweet potatoes and butternut squash KellerInternationalwith the information it needed would have been in abundance. It is likely that the to expand the program. Among the results were effects on consumption and nutritional status encouraging data suggesting that household pro- would have been even larger. duction of fruits and vegetables could be possible Itlnoz?atiz~efeaturesand successfactors. Thesuccess throughout the year with sometechnicalassistance of this project appears to be attributable,at least in and support. A midterm evaluation in 1992 con- part, to successfulcoordination among multidisci- firmed that the combined homestead gardening, plinary groups of agriculturists, nutritionists, and nutrition education,and gender aspectsof the pro- the community. The inclusion of complementary gram had a very positive impact on vegetable con- project componentssuchas theprimary health care sumption among women and young children.The activity (whichmonitored child growth) and nutri- monitoring and evaluation system of the pilot pro- tion education likewisealsocontributed to thepro- gram also identified challenges that needed to be ject's success. Nutrition and agriculture education overcome.For instance,households were unable to were found to be necessary but not sufficientcon- sustain change without a regular supply of quality ditions to achieving marked improvements in nu- seeds and other inputs.Scalingup the pilot would trition. This finding suggests that, at least in this require greater understanding of a number of is- context,food insecurity was a significantconstraint sues, includingculturalbeliefsabout child feeding, to behavior change and that the collaboration be- maternal food intake during pregnancy, intra- tween agriculture and health allowed the synergies household food distribution, and the role women between the two sectors to improve nutrition. play in program activities. 40 From Aaricullure to Nulrilion: Pathwavs.Svne~ies,and Outcomes Thelarge quantity of data provided by the pilot which demonstrations and training on low-cost, program was then used to develop a larger-scale low-risk gardening practices were conducted and homestead gardening program, including theneed seeds, seedlings, and saplings were produced and for adequatemanagement and human resourcesto distributed. Most of thevillagenurseriesin thepro- implement a large-scale community program. The gram operated as small enterprises. pilot study was expanded in collaboration with Each NGO was encouraged to form 45 village local NGOs and the government of Bangladesh nurseries per subdistrict, with a minimum of 800 into the "NGOGardening and NutritionEducation square meters serving 5 to 10 villages. Five to 10 SurveillanceProject" in 1993(Talukderet al.2000). working groups of the NGOs of approximately 20 Eventually,the program was scaled up to national- women each were linked to each nursery to partic- level coverage, supporting 900,000 households ipatein the gardening program. A group leader or supporting 4.5million beneficiaries. selected individual was identified to develop and On the basis of the success of the experiencein manage the nursery. The group leader also facili- Bangladesh, the project was replicated by Helen tated nutrition and health education through peer Keller International in Cambodia, Nepal, and the education among the women's groups. HKI pro- Philippines and adapted to Niger (HKI2004,2006). vided training and technical assistanceto the agri- Recognizingthat micronutrientslikevitamin Aare culturists and extension agents of the partner less bioavailable from vegetable sources, HKI NGOsand,together with them,provided technical began a pilot extensionof its home-gardening pro- assistance based on the needs of the households gram by integrating animal husbandry in and nursery owners. This technical assistancewas Cambodia,Bangladesh,and Nepal.Theincorpora- designed to reinforce and improve existing posi- tion of an animal-source food intervention bene- tive gardening and consumption practices. fitedrichly fromcollaborationwith a long-running, Program monitoring was an essential part of well-establishedprogram with capacity for nutri- program implementation and was particularly im- tion education, production training, and monitor- portant inscalingup. Monitoringwas used to iden- ing and evaluation. tify problems and priorities and develop solutions Intervention elements and scope. The objectives of based on sharingbetween thebeneficiariesand the the Bangladesh homestead gardening program program staff.In addition to the monitoringof pro- were threefold: gram activities, HKI staff regularly supervised NGO field and management staff. By implement- To increase the number of households that ing theprogram inpartnership with NGOs, house- sustainably produce different varieties of holds continue to receive technical support for vegetablesand fruits throughout the year homestead gardening and the program continues To increase the number of households pro- to expand without input and resources fromHKI. ducing more varieties of vegetables Gender was an important focusof project activ- To increase consumption of vitamin A-rich ities. Women in rural Bangladesh have tradition- foods and improve the nutritional status of allymanaged seasonalhomesteadgardening,from the most vulnerable groups sowing to harvesting and storing seeds. Thus the Thegardening and nutrition educationactivities program actively targeted women in an effort to were linked with the ongoing development pro- provide them with new opportunities to generate grams of local NGOs. Strong linkages were estab- income related to homestead gardening. Women lished with participating communities to ensure are also generally responsible for procuring and sustainability. The NGOs' work with women's preparing food for their children. It is estimated groups helped them to address the social and cul- that at least 90 percent of the targeted households tural constraints faced by women in Bangladesh. are represented by women. These NGOs were supported financially by HKI To incorporate animal source foods into the in- for the first three years of the project. The estab- tervention, model farms were established with ex- lishment of village-level nurseries and homestead istingvillagenurseries. Theanimal sourcefoodsof gardens was conducted by the NGOs in conjunc- focus were poultry in Cambodia and Nepal and tionwith community groups.Thevillagenurseries poultry, milk, and fish in Bangladesh.Each model served asa community supportservicenetwork in farm supported a number of households with Case Studies 41 training and support for household poultry rear- kg of fruits during the same period for control ing, including improved breeding stock and households (Bushamuka et al. 2005). chickenmanagement services.Nutrition education Results also revealed that children in house- focused on dietary diversity, micronutrient con- holds with developed gardens consumed 1.6times sumption, and maternal and child nutrition (HKI more vegetables. Among children ages 12-59 2003).In Cambodia, the village-levelpoultry farms months who had not received a vitamin A capsule were owned by village farmers and run as mi- in the six months prior to the survey, the risk of croenterprises. night blindness was lower when their house had a Assessing impact. The NGO Gardening and homestead garden. Thus, having a homestead gar- Nutrition Education Surveillance Project used an den appeared to reduce the need for vitamin A integrated monitoring system to provide regular supplementation. feedback on program progress. The data were col- Seventy-threepercent of the gardens were man- lected on a regular basis using a simple question- aged by women, and women were the main deci- naire on seed production, vegetable and fruit sion makers concerning gardening practices and production and consumption, and income. In ad- the use of the incomeearned by sellinggardenpro- dition, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in duce (Talukder et al. 2000). February and March2002toevaluate theeconomic Households earned, on average, the equivalent and social impact of the program on its beneficia- of US$8 on a bimonthly basis by selling the fruits ries and the sustainability of the program. and vegetables. The main use of this income was This evaluation comprised three groups of 720 for food and also to invest in seeds, seedlings, households each, totaling 2,160 households, rep- saplings, poultry, or other income-generating ac- resenting active program participants, former tivities. Nearly 10percent of households saved in- program participants, and control households. come generated from the garden. Results also Structured questionnaires were used, and data on revealed that households with improved or de- homestead garden production were estimated in veloped homestead gardens consumed micronu- kilograms by the homestead caretaker.Additional trient-rich, noncereal foods more frequently than information was collected on the adoption of did other households. These foods, such as lentils year-round production practices, consumption and animal products, are not actually produced in levels of garden produce, amounts of cash gener- the garden, but were purchased using income ated, changes in the ability of women to con- generated from the selling of garden produce tribute to household livelihoods, and other (HKI2003). developments. Chicken liver is a particularly rich source of vit- Evaluation results. The program increased the amin A and other essential micronutrients. In production and consumption of fruits and vegeta- Cambodia and Nepal, the percentage of house- bles in the areas it covered and increased the num- holds consuming chicken liver increased from 21 ber of varieties consumed.Monitoring showed that percent to 35percent and from28percent to41per- the percentage of householdswithout a homestead cent, respectively, among those households con- garden decreased from 25 percent at baseline to suming it from their own production. less than 2 percent after one year (Talukder et al. In Bangladesh and Cambodia, egg production 2000). After one year of participation in the pro- and consumption increased. In Bangladesh, 94 gram, the percentage of households who practiced percent of the participant households consumed year-round (developed) gardening had increased eggs in the seven days before the survey-an in- significantly from 3 percent to 33 percent. The crease of 48 percentage points over the baseline. number of varieties and the volume of vegetables - More important, egg consumption increased dis- produced in developed gardens were three times proportionately among women and children, al- higher than those produced using traditional gar- most doubling. There were no changes in egg dens. The cross-sectional evaluation conducted in consumption in the control group. Nutrition edu- winter 2002revealed that householdsparticipating cation emphasized both intrahousehold distribu- in the project produced a median of 135kg of veg- tion issues and micronutrient consumption and etables and 24 kg of fruit in the preceding three focused on the special needs of women and young months, compared with 46 kg of vegetables and 14 children. 42 From Agriculture to Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies, and Outcomes Strengtks, limitations, and conclusions. This pro- own production was the dominant one. The in- gram is a successstory of the scaling up of a small- come pathway was not as consistently docu- scale gardening program. Limited experience mented, thereby preventing a firm conclusion existsof successfulscalingupof gardening and nu- about its relative importance across the four case trition programs, and the Bangladesh model isone studies. The Bangladesh-Africa study, however, that has been well documented and has been suc- does document an impact on income, which trans- cessfully replicated in several countries in Asia. lated intopurchasing and higher-qualityfoodsand Theprogram continuestoexpand in Bangladesh overallenhanced diet quality and nutrient intakes. into new areas and to additional households in the Thecasestudieseachmade auniquecontribution current working areas. The gardening model has to thecurrent understanding of potentialmodalities been adopted by the Government of the People's linking agriculture and nutrition and key success Republic of Bangladesh and has become part of a factors.Thebiofortifiedorangefleshedsweetpotato program of the Department of Agriculture intervention,which resulted inlargeincreasesinvi- Extension. In 1997, HKI started the phaseout of tamin A intakes and status, provides encouraging technical and financial support to NGOs that had signalsfor futureinterventionsinvolving thisnewly already received three years of its support. bred crop. The focuson gender in the legume pro- Monitoring information from these areas one year ject was highly successfulin achieving meaningful after the withdrawal shows that thehouseholds are increasesinlegumeconsumptioninyoungchildren. maintaining their improved gardening practices In SouthAfrica,the successfulpartnership between and continue to consume fruits and vegetables the agriculturaland health sectorsappears tobe re- more regularly. sponsible for the impacts on maternal knowledge andvitaminAstatus.Thatstudy alsounderlinesthe importanceof boosting food availability and access LESSONSFROMTHE FOUR through agriculturein contextsin which food inse- CASE STUDIES curity is a major constraint to behavior change. In Thecasestudiesdrew from the experienceof many Bangladesh, both the production-consumption-in- previous interventions. All four employed a nutri- takepathway and the incomepathway appeared to tion education component directed at behavior have played a role in improving vitamin A intake change in the participating communities. Each of and status. The Bangladesh case study is also a them also took local contexts into account, built unique example of the successful scaling up of a partnerships with different members of the com- homestead garden project and of the importanceof munities to promote ownership, and purposefully focusingon women. involvedwomenand targeted theirempowerment. Earlier reviews had noted the importance of All four interventions achieved their ultimate properly designing and conducting evaluations of objectiveof improving the intake of focusnutrient- agriculture and nutrition interventions to better rich foods by target population groups, especially documentimpact and best practices.Thecasestud- women and young children. The two studies that iesreaffirm that carefulevaluation design iscritical measured biochemical indicators of vitamin A de- but remains a challenge because all the method- ficiencyalsodocumented a significantreduction in ologies employed had certain limitations. Scaling the prevalence of vitamin A deficiency in children. up also remains a challenge.With rare exceptions, The Bangladesh study documented reductions in the interventions remain small in scale and un- night blindness (a clinical sign of vitamin A defi- likely to achieve broad impacts. To scale up agri- ciency) among children of households with a cultural interventions to have a broad and homestead garden. Although none of the studies sustainable impact requires their integration into rigorously modeled the pathways of impact the the activitiesof institutions, both in the agriculture interventions followed, the marked increases sectorand inother sectorswhose activitiescancon- recorded in production, consumption, and intake tribute to improved nutrition outcomes. These in- suggest that the direct pathway of consumption of stitutional issues are dealt with in chapter 6. The ChangingContext I of Agriculture and I The economic and policy context surrounding agriculture-nutrition linkages has been changing rapidly during the past 25 years. This chapter examines four types of change that drive behaviors among producers and consumers and that together are transforming the agricultural landscape and its relationship to human nutrition. Agricultural policy Agricultural technology Food marketing systems Food consumption patterns These changes affect the broader context in which nutrition-ori- ented agricultural interventions are implemented. They also affect each of thepathways through which agricultureaffectsnutrition, no- tably consumption of own-production, producer incomes, and food prices. The effects on these three pathways, which are the subject of this chapter, are summarized in table 5. AGRICULTURAL POLICY Until the 1970sand 1980s,domestic agricultural and food policies in many developing countries assumed an interventionist stance. The policiesapplied principally to staple crops,but extended outward to agricultural products generally, including fruits and vegetables. Government agencies often controlled trade in food products with laws that limited private trading, notably by restricting the purchase or movement of production output by private firms.Theseinterven- tionist policy regimes tended to discriminate against agriculture and in favor of urban-industrial growth. Examples of such policies in- cluded import substitution, financial-sectorcontrols,and overvalued exchange rates as well as taxing agriculture to subsidize urban and industrial development (Christensen and Witucki 1982;World Bank 1986;Krueger, Schiff,and Valdes 1991;Bhagwati1993;Delgado 1995; Sanders et al. 1996; Sahn et al. 1997; Teranishi 1997;Badiane 2000; Thorbecke2000).Agriculture was seenprimarily asfuel for industrial growth rather than as a source of growth in itself. Since that time, agricultural policy in most developing countries has undergone a major paradigm shift aspart of what is often termed "globalization."Although theroleof the government in foodmarkets continues to be extensive, governments have dismantled state mar- keting mechanismsand liberalizedtrade and investment. In addition, 44 From Agriculture lo Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies, and Outcomes through changes in exchange rate regimes and cantly altered the effectivetrade regime for agri- trade liberalization in the nonagricultural sector, culturalproducers in many countries aswell as the the levelsof taxation or "disprotection" of the agri- availabilityof products forconsumers. Twopromi- cultural sector have declined over time. Overall, nent examples are the European "Everything but private markets have assumed greater importance Arms" initiative and the US "African Growth and relative to state intervention. Opportunity Act," both of which give expanded Trade liberalization has been a particularly im- access to selected low-income countries. Some portant policy change. Until the 1970sand 1980s, countries such as Bangladesh have also attempted developing-country governments favored restrict- unilateral liberalization. Regional trade agree- inginternationalfood trade to limitimport compe- ments have also been developed, increasing at a tition and to prevent export-driven increases in rate of 15percent in the 1990s (FA0 2004). These food prices. This changed with the culmination of changes have resulted in a rising share of output the Uruguay Round and the Agreement on being traded, as wellaschangesin the composition Agriculture in 1994,which resulted in the develop- of trade. The average tariff on nonagricultural ment of a more open multilateral system for trade goods fellfrom about 40 percent in 1947to 4.7 per- in agricultural products. Although the pace of re- cent by the end of the Uruguay Round in 1993. forms would later stall during the Doha Round of Since1971,globalagricultural exports have grown the World Trade Organization a decade later, a number of North-South preferential trading 7 These calculationsarebased on FA0 statisticsforagricultural arrangements would still come into existence. exports and the World Development Indicatorsfor agricul- Preferential trading arrangements have signifi- tural value added and the US dollarGDP deflators. The Changing Context of Agriculture and Nutrition Linkages 45 at 3 percent a year in real terms, while agricultural food availability was recorded in Kenya and production has grown at0.7percenta year.As are- Malawi, whereas in China, per capita supplies of sult, the share of agricultural production that is ex- the principal nutrients improved dramatically. In ported has doubled, rising from 19percent in 1971 Tanzania,per capita availabilityof the main nutri- to 40 percent in 2003.7 entsdeclinedfollowingreform.Theeffectsof struc- This shift in agricultural policy has important tural policy reforms on household incomestend to implications for nutrition. The increased market rely on the overall response of the economy to the orientation of agriculture has altered the incentives reforms. In countries in which postreform eco- forfoodproducersto selltheirproducts in themar- nomic growth was inadequate, poverty was likely ketplace, thus altering availability for own-con- to deepen. Overall the study concluded that food sumption. There are also important implications availability, accessibility, and stability could be via the food price pathway and the income path- worsened in the short to medium term if trade lib- way, as discussed below. eralization is introduced without a policy package Agricultural policy changes and food prices. designed to offset its negative effects-specially Agricultural policy can affect food consumption forcountriesin earlierstagesof economicdevelop- patterns by creating incentives, disincentives, or ment. The Economic Research Service of the U.S. both to theproduction of differentfoods,and there- Department of Agriculture has also examined fore their relative availability and prices (Nugent this question. The service used a computable 2004; Hawkes 2007a, 2007b).Liberalization of agri- model to assess the direct impact of agricultural culture and trade policy has particularly strong im- liberalization on the "nutritional gap" (i.e., per plications. In theory, liberalization can lead to capita food availabilityrelative to minimum nutri- decreases or increases in consumer prices. At the tional requirements) in 67 low-income countries national level,the impacton commodityprices will (Trueblood and Shapouri 2001).According to the vary across commodities, depending on whether baseline forecast from the model, the nutritional thecountryis anet importeror anetexporterof that gap was projected tobe21.9milliontonsin 2010.In commodity.Theobservedpatternof tradeinwhich terms of the impact on prices, the study projected developing countries are net exporters of high- that long-run,real-world foodprices would riseby value, micronutrient-rich crops implies that con- about 12percent and that developing country ex- sumer prices arehigher for those products than the ports would increaseby about30percentfollowing prices that would prevail in a closed economy.The global trade liberalization. When fed into the reverse would hold for the supply of macronutri- model, thesepricechangesled to a reduction innu- ents because the developing countries broadly are tritional gaps in the studied countries by 6.4 per- net importers of grains. cent. These gains are relatively modest because of Trade reforms affect food prices in part by af- the lack of producer response in developing coun- fecting the amount of food available. Thus, the tries, the declining share of agriculture in total ex- price of importable food products decreases with ports, and the small share of food imports in total trade liberalization (as supply increases with im- domesticfood availability. ports) and the price of exportable food product in- Agricultural policy changes and producer incomes: creases with liberalization (as domestic supply In theory, the impact of trade liberalization on decreases). Box 4 presents a synthesis of cases in producer incomes depends on whether the sector South Asia that have undergone changes in their in question was protected or taxed initially. trade policies and have experienced different out- Sectors that were protected initially would face comesinfoodavailabilityfor consumption.The re- greater import competition and could lose out, lationship between trade reforms and food whereas those that were taxed initially could ben- availability,accessibility,and stabilityhasbeen ex- efitfrom new opportunities from trade liberaliza- plored by FA0 in a seriesof 15country case stud- tion. Theoretically, if resources (including labor) ies (Thomas 2006). Enormous differences in could be effortlessly transferred across sectors, outcomeswere observedbetween the 15countries, then the transition following trade liberalization someattributable to the nature and extentofthe re- would be less detrimental to household income, forms themselves, others attributable to the het- with subsequent implications for food consump- erogeneity of initial conditions. Modest growth in tion. In reality, the structural features of the de- 46 From Agriculture to Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies, and Outcomes veloping countries imply that resources are not tries, then trade liberalization can result in a rise freely mobile across sectors and those employed in poverty, at least in the short run. The impact of in the protected sectors would, in fact, suffer trade liberalization on income is therefore likely likely job and income losses due to trade liberal- to differ, depending on the initial status of the ization. When the group of losers from trade lib- country (as a net importer or net exporter) and eralization includes a large section of the poor, as then within the country across net producers and may well be the case in many developing coun- consumers. The Changing Context of Agriculture and Nutrition Linkages 47 AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY technologyhas longfocusedonplant breeding and varietal improvements designed to raise produc- The growth of agricultural technology has been tivityand yields.In the past 50years,technological dramatic during the past 25 years. Developments changehasled to spectacularoutcomes,such asthe that carry particularly important implications for Green Revolutionin wheat and rice and the broad food availability and patterns of food demand and acceptance of single-cross hybrids in maize consumption are plant breeding-focused mainly (Baenzinger2006). on increasing yield and productivity, but more re- In 2003a study published in thejournal Science cently on increasing crop nutrient content-and presented an analysis of the contribution of Green technologies related to food processing and mar- Revolutioncrop breeding technologies to produc- keting, such as those that maintain a cold chain tivity by crop, region, and by decade between the from farm to plate. The effects of developments in 1960s and 1990s.Figure 7 shows the evolution of agricultural technology on food production and food production per capita. With the exception of consumption can be classified into three impacts Sub-SaharanAfrica in the 1980s,the production of (shownin Figure 6).The first is the impact on rela- food per capita shows an increasing trend that can tive prices and on the relative profitability of dif- be largely attributed to new crop varieties ferent products for producers. The second is (Evensonand Gollin 2003).During the same time technology's impact on the labor and incomes of period, foods not subject to varietal improvements agricultural households. The third is the role of saw littleor no productivity changeand as a result technologyin introducing new food products with have risen in price and been removed from many different nutritional properties. production portfolios.The case of pulses in India, Tec~zrzo~ogy'sinzpactson relative prices arid relative which have seen littleif any varietal improvement, profitability of dtfferent food products. Agricultural sharply rising relative prices, and declining aver- 48 From Agriculture to Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies, and Ourcomes Technologicalchange in agricultu~ Technologicalchangeoutsideagriculture Inproduction Access to services In marketing Access to information The ChangingContext of Agriculture and Nutrition Linkages 49 age consumption, provides a particularly usefulil- for example, postharvest technology and market- lustration (box5). ing are likely to play a more important role in re- In contrast, real food prices of the crops subject ducing prices.Estimates from the Rabobank (2006) to productivity gains declined during the 1980s conjecture that postharvest losses lead to the and 1990s,for the world as a whole and for most spoilage of up to 30 percent of the fruits and veg- developing countries. Using the IMPACT model etables produced in India. Postharvest losses in developed by the International Food Policy fruitsand vegetables were as high as 50percent in ResearchInstitute(IFPRI),analysts simulated what Malawi in 2001 (Mwangwela 2001).In such a sce- food prices would have been in the absence of the nario, improved postharvest technology could sig- Green Revolution. Thesimulated prices were used nificantly affect marketing costs and consumer to calculate the economic availability of food and, food prices. in turn, the impacts on childhood malnutrition. Technology's impacts on labor and incomes ofagri- According to the study, had the Green Revolution cultural households.Technologicalchange affectsthe not occurred, the proportion of malnourished chil- demand foragricultural labor and thus the income dren in developingcountries would have been 6 to of farm and nonfarm households in rural areas. 8percentage points higher than it is.In SouthAsia, There are a number of different impact scenarios. the percentage would have been 12 to 15 points As production expands there may be an increasein higher (Evensonand Gollin2003). the demand for labor that has a positive effect on Many other agricultural technologies have im- the incomes of landless laborers. Alternatively, plicationsfor food prices.Forfruitsand vegetables, technological change that leads to more mecha- 50 From Agriculture to Nutrition: Pathways, Synerg~es,and Outcomes nization could reduce labor demand. It is possible they are consumed by producers, or through the that labor-augmenting and labor-saving technolo- incomepathway if sold, or the food-pricepathway gies could be introduced simultaneously, making if it makes micronutrient-rich foodsmore available the impact ambiguous. Technological change may in the marketplace. also depress prices and, under conditions of low Plant breeding technologiescan alsoexpand the demand elasticity,negatively affect the incomesof range of crops available for people to plant in somefarmers, particularly those who donot adopt homestead gardens),thus againbringing potential the technologyor those who adopt it late. nutritional benefits through the own-consumption A 1993report (Kennedy and Bouis 1993)pub- and food price pathways. For example, ajoint FA0 lished by the International Food Policy Research (Foodand Agriculture Organization) and AVRDC- Institute provided a number of such examples in RCA (AsianVegetableResearchand Development which agriculture-nutrition linkages worked Center-Regional Center in Africa ) project to re- through changesin labor demand. An earlier study duce vitamin A and iron deficiencies sought to published in 1987had examined households that stagger the production of differentvarieties of in- adopted modern rice varieties in the North Arcot digenous vegetables, many of which are seasonal, District of Tamil Nadu between 1973and 1983.In to provide greater continuity throughout the year those households, the real value of consumption (Aphane et al. 2003). had doubled during that period, with a shift toward more varied diets as demand for labor FOOD MARKETING SYSTEMS increased during the early phases of the Green Revolution(Hazel11987).Subsequent phases of the The past 20 years have seen substantial change in Green Revolution,however, saw increasing trends the ways that food is marketed from farm-to-plate. toward mechanization and related declines in An important development has been the rise of labor demand (Binswanger and von Braun 1991). domesticand international marketing systemscon- The studies examining the relationship between trolled by private actors rather than state market- agricultural commercialization and nutrition out- ing mechanisms. More open trade and investment comes summarized in chapter 3 included some have made buying companies, products, and ser- projects involving technology adoption. Overall, vices easier across national borders, so creating in- those studies found that although incomeand food centives for agri-food companies to grow and expenditures were affected, impacts on child nu- transnationalize through vertical integration and tritional status were limited and mixed. In a more globalsourcing. Themodernization of agricultural recent study, women with the most access to new marketing channels has had huge implications for rice varieties experienced less seasonal fluctuation agricultural producers via the income and own- in body weight, 1.1kilograms compared with a 2.9- consumptionpathway. The increasing importance kilogram fluctuation for women with the least ac- of private institutions has strong implications for cess (Kerr 2006). An earlier study of pregnant producers' incomes, and new marketing arrange- women in the Gambia indicated that less body ments have altered their incentivesto sellfood into weight fluctuation between the dry season and the the marketplacerelative toproducing forown-con- rainy season, combined with an additional 500 sumption. The process has also had important im- calories a day, would likely lead to improvements plications for food consumption patterns by in birth weights (Lawrenceet a1.1987).These stud- altering the range and mix of products available in iesdealt with staplecrops.For perishable crops like the marketplace, the price of the food, and the way fruits, vegetables, livestock, and fish, access to it is sold and promoted, all of which affect con- postharvest infrastructure and affordable technol- sumption decisions. Three changes in the market- ogy are also likely to affect farm incomes. ing chain are particularly important from a food Techrlology arzd the irltrodliction 01rle7oIood prod- consumption perspective: food processing, food ucts. Agricultural technologiescan affect the nutri- retail, and food exports. tional properties of foods by increasing micro- Food processirlg. Food processors have emerged nutrient content, for example through biofortifica- as important actors in the agricultural marketing tion. Biofortified crops can benefit nutrition chain. Instead of selling crops direct for prepara- through the own-consumption pathway when tion in the home, agriculture increasingly supplies The ChangingContext ofAgricultureand Nutrition Linkages 51 raw materials to the food processing industry for developing countries, supermarkets' share of the the production of durable foods. This has implica- retail food market is highest in middle-income tions for nutrition through the food price pathway, countries such as Brazil, Argentina, and Thailand, because it has altered the availability and prices of and lowest in low-incomeAsian countries, such as processed foods in the marketplace. As food pro- Bangladesh and Vietnam. Supermarkets in devel- cessing has become a more important component oping countries are better able to handle both of the marketingchain, the shareof processed food processed foods and fresh products, but in most in total consumption has risen. Global sales of developing countries,processed foodstend to have processed foods areUS$3.2 trillion,of which about a smaller share of the market than fresh fruits and US$2.0 trillion is spent on packaged food and vegetables. US$1.2 trillion on beverages. These global figures These changes have implications for nutrition are strongly affected by demand in industrialized through the food-price pathway. Supermarkets countries, where consumersspend about half their have the potential to increase or lower food prices food budget on processed, packaged foods (Minot (Kuipers 2005; World Bank 2006). Because of and Roy 2006). Consumers in lower-middle-in- higher marketing efficiency, food prices in super- come countries spend less on processed foods- markets could be lower. At the same time, there about one-third, while in low-incomecountries like couldbe apremium on food prices asa result of the Kenya, India, and Vietnam, the proportion is less convenience and the standards that the supermar- than 15 percent (Gelhar and Regmi 2005). kets provide. Also, if the growth of supermarkets However, what isnotable is that the rate of increase leads them to gain dominant market power, they of expenditure is far higher in developing relative could exploit the inelasticityof food demand to in- to developed countries, as shown on Table 6. In creaseprices (Minotand Roy 2006). India, recent evidence points to a notable shift to- Two empirical facts are important to consider ward processed foodsover time. A demand model when trying to assess the potential impact on food developed at the International Food Policy prices. First, supermarkets have not yetbecome the Research Institute (IFPRI)projects that Indian ex- supply source for all consumers in developing penditures on processed foods will rise faster than countries.Thereisampleevidenceof supermarkets expenditures on both total food and nonfood and traditional retail existingsideby side. In many goods (Raviand Roy 2006). places, the emergence of supermarkets has created Food retail. Agricultural producersnow sellmore a segmented market, with the richer sectionsof the and more of their products directly to large-scale population sourcing their consumption from su- retail outlets (supermarkets,hypermarkets),rather permarkets and the low-income class sourcing than to localmarkets or to wholesalers. Supermar- from traditional retail.Second,in many developing kets have been growing rapidly in recent years in developingcountries, driven largelyby the growth 8 The data mustbe interpreted with cautionbecause the defiii- of transnational enterprises (Table 7).s Among itions of supermarkets aiid retailsales differ across countries. 52 From Agriculture to Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies, and Outcomes countries, including those like South Africa, in Food exports. As already noted, trade liberaliza- which the coverage of retail by supermarkets is tion has enabled a significant increase in the high, there is no evidence for any substantial in- amount of agricultural products that are exported crease in food prices. rather than consumed in domestic markets. The Two empirical studies provide some insights modernization of agricultural markets has also fa- into the impact of supermarkets on food prices. cilitated the expansion of the development and in- Neven et al. (2006)compared prices in Nairobi su- tegration of international food marketing systems, permarkets with the prices of similar products in including the extensive supply chains that serve traditional retail. The prices of nine fresh produce large food retail industries. Trade liberalization is items were, on average, 6 percent higher in super- also associated with a shift in the commodity com- markets, and the prices of processed food products position of international food trade toward higher- were,on average,about 3percent lower.Consumer value products, accelerating a trend under way surveys revealed that the urban poor bought since the 1960s.Between the 1960sand the 1990s, processed foods in supermarkets and fresh pro- grain exports fell sharply from 15percent to 8 per- duce in wet markets, as would be expected, given centof the totalvalue of agricultural trade (table8). these price relationships. A similar analysis of hor- At the same time, exports of higher-value agricul- ticultural products in Argentina found that the tural products, such asfruits and vegetables,meat, prices for fruitsand vegetables were, on average, 6 dairy products, eggs, and fish and seafood, grew percent and 14percent higher in supermarkets,re- from 29 percent to 42 percent of total value. The spectively, relative to traditional retail outlets share of fish and seafood, in particular, increased (Ghezan et al. 2002). However, the average price from less than 5percent to more than 13percent of for all food and beverages was 5 percent lower in world agricultural trade. supermarkets. Despite the large market share of Thecomposition of agricultural exports has also supermarkets in Argentina (70 percent in 2000), changed in terms of the share of processed versus small fruit and vegetable shopscontinued to dom- fresh products. It has been estimated that inate horticultural retail sales.Theauthors citesur- processed food exports grew 4.2 percent per year vey results indicating that 71 percent of fresh fruits between 1980 and 1994--twice as fast as primary and vegetables were bought from traditional retail product exports (Athukorala and Sen 1998) and, outlets. according to FAO, the share of processed products The Changing ContextofAgriculture and Nutrition Linkages 53 inagricultural exports increasedfrom41percent in FOOD CONSUMPTION PATTERNS the 1980sto51percent in the 1990s(FA02004).The growth in theshareof agricultural exports that are Economic growth, demographic change, urban- processed canbe seen in almost allcommodity cat- ization, and global media and mass marketing egories. The exceptions to this pattern are fruits have stimulated rapid changesand diversification and vegetables. The share among world agricul- in food consumption patterns.Theshiftingpattern tural exports of both primary and processed fruits is evident in increasing demand for high-value and vegetables has increased during this period, foods relative to cereals and pulses in most devel- but growth in fresh fruit and vegetableexports has oping countries (Popkin 2006). Per capita con- been greater. The proportion of processed foods sumption of cereals and pulses contracted during that are exported does, however, remain smaller the 1990s, while annual vegetable consumption than the proportion of agricultural commodities grew 3.7percent;fish and seafood,2.2percent;and that are exported, probably, in part, arising from fruit and meat, between 1 percent and 2 percent the higher tariffs imposed on processed products (table9).Less of this food is consumed from own- (Gelharand Regrni 2005). production and more purchased from the market- This changing pattern of exports has implica- place. Regionally, between 1982 and 2002, East tions for nutrition through the food-pricepathway and South Asian countries saw per capita con- becauseit increasesthe availability of certainfoods sumption of vegetables and fruits rising quickly. over others in exporting and importing countries Meat, milk, eggs, fish, and seafood consumption (Hawkes 2006,2007a, 200%). Whereas consumers grew more slowly, but still increased more than in developing countries now consume more the consumption of staples. In 2002, East and processed foods and vegetable oils exported from Southeast Asia exhibited the highest per capita developed and other developing countries, con- consumption of vegetables in the developing sumersin developed countriesnow consumemore world, at 64 kilograms per person per year, and fruits,vegetables, and fish exported from develop- the highest consumption of fish and seafood, at 26 ing countries. Another important trend is the in- kilograms per person per year.9Increases in con- creased export of animal feed, which has enabled sumption of high-value food products were par- the rapid growth of livestock production around ticularly high in China, in which, between 1962 the world. Hawkes (2007a)cites an example from and 2002, per capita intake of vegetables grew 4.9 Colombia,inwhich trade liberalizationin the 1990s percent; fruit, 8 percent; and meat, 8.7 percent. In led to increased imports of corn for animal feed from the United States4irectly stimulating the 9 The FA0 definition of fruits and vegetables includes root growthof thepoultry industry.Subsequently,poul- crops such as potatoes and sweet potatoes. Because these try prices plummeted in Colombia and consump- items are almost staples in some countries, the definition tion soared, whereas beef consumption declined. overstatesthe shareof the nonstaple food. 54 From Agriculture lo Nutrillon: Pathways, Synergtes,dnd Oulcom~s 2002, the Latin American and Caribbean region arable land used for vegetable and fruit cultivation had the highest annual per capita consumption of has remained stablein the developed countries, but fruits in the developing world, at 102 kilograms has increased markedly in most developing re- per person; the highest meat consumption, at 61 gions, as reflected in table 10. The share of land kilograms; and the highest milk and eggs con- used for cereals and pulses production declined in sumption, at 113kilograms. Processed food con- developed countries and in Latin America, but re- sumption has risen in all regions. mained constant or slightly increased in Asia and As part of these trends, the consumption of Africa,implyingthat fruits and vegetables have re- high-calorie,nutrient-poor foodsis also rising, no- placed other crops.Thegrowthin grain production tably of vegetable oils, meat, processed foods, and declined from more than 4 percent annually in the food prepared away from home. These dietary 1960sto less than 1percent in the 1990s(table 11). changes toward high-calorie, nutrient-poor The production of high-value agricultural com- processed and prepared foodsare accompanied by modities in contrast has grown between 2 percent changing, generally lower, levelsofphysical activ- and 5 percent annually during the past 40 years, ity, as occupations shift to service-sector jobs, with the exception of milk, whch grew between 1 especially in urban areas. In these settings, con- percent and 2 percent.'" sumers in developing countries are now experi- These changes in production patterns are in encing what is termed the "nutrition transition" part a response to changes in consumer demand, toward some of the problems as well as the bene- in part a stimulator of consumer demand (Hawkes fits of populations in industrialized countries: the 2007a, 200%). They have implications for nutrition rise in overweight, obesity, and associated chronic through the food-price pathway and also through diseases like heart disease, hypertension, and dia- the income pathway because smallholder produc- betes (Popkin 1999,2002;Popkin and Du 2003). tion that answers the growing demand for high- Asconsumption patterns have changed,so have value food sources may have a positive effect on agricultural production patterns. Global produc- tion of oil crops, for example, increased by about 1.9 million tons annually between 1990 and 2005. 10The shift in Chinese production has been particularly dra- matic. China reduced the share of arable land in cereals by Production of vegetables has also increased half between 1975and 2002, while grain productivity almost markedly, growing at 4.2 percent per year. An in- doubled. The share of land used for fruit productio~ihas in- creasingshareof arable and permanent land isnow creased from 2 percent in the late 1970s to 6 percent in 2002. used for vegetable and fruit production, and al- Similarly, for vegetables, land use has risen from 3 percent in the mid-1970s to 13percent in 2002. In 2002China accounted most all of this increase is occurring in developing for 47 percent of total world vegetable production (in volume countries (Minot and Roy 2006). The share of the terms) and 15percent of fruit production. The Changing Context of Agriculrure and Nutrition Linkages 55 the producer's consumption by raising income. fish are labor-intensive, have low gestation peri- For example, in South and Southeast Asia, diver- ods, and generate quick returns. These qualities sification into high-value food commodities led to serve to make them highly suitable for smallhold- the development of innovative supply chains, ers, representing an often perfect opportunity to opening new prospects for augmenting income, utilize their surplus labor and augment their in- generating employment, and promoting exports comes (Barghouti et al. 2004; Weinberger and (Barghouti et al. 2004; Pingali 2004; Deshingkar et Lumpkin 2005).Whether asmallholder-dominated al. 2003; Pokharel 2003; Wickramasinghe et al. economycanactuallydiversify and whether small- 2003; Goletti 1999).Food security, moreover, im- holders participate substantially in the diversifica- proved in regions in which agricultural diversifi- tion of production toward high-value products is cation took place in favor of horticulture, animal context specific.A 2006 assessment of diversifica- husbandry, and aquaculture (Barghoutiet al.2005; tion toward high-value crops in India from the Dorjee et al. 2002). point of view of participating smallholders found From the perspective of poverty reduction, di- evidence that the probability of a household diver- versifying production toward high-value crops is sifying into vegetable cultivation is higher for particularly appealing.Most high-value food com- smaller farmers (Birthal et al.2006).Vegetable cul- modities such as fruits, vegetables, poultry, and tivation was preferred over fruitcultivation, which 56 FromAgriculture to Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies, and Outcomes is generally less labor-intensive and more capital- of small farmers relative to large farmers is not intensive (with respect to start-up and working fixed and can change over time, usually as a result capital);both of these characteristicsare to the dis- of changes in physical, human, or social capital. advantage of small farmers. Farmers may acquire new equipment or build The transition toward high-value agricultureis, physical capital, likeirrigation works, that reduces however, not without constraints, especially for the cost of production. Farmer's skills and human smallholders. When the high-value commodities capitalchange over time as a result of leaming-by- are products the farmers have not grown before, doing, aided in some instances by technical assis- they will lackinformation onproduction methods, tanceprovided by buyers (Minotand Roy 2006). marketingopportunities, and the probable distrib- ution of net returns. This problem can be particu- CONCLUSIONS larly acute when producers have to satisfy highly specific quality and food safety requirements Changes in agricultural policy, technology, mar- (MinotandRoy 2006).Largerfarmers arealsooften kets, and associated changes in food consumption better able to bear the risks associated with pro- patterns areaffectingthedynamics of thepathways ducing and marketing high-value commodities. between agriculture and nutrition. Today,themore Furthermore, for a small farmer to allocateland to market-oriented nature of agricultural policies a commercialcrop may imply depending on mar- means that agricultural technology and markets ket purchases to meet food requirements, an addi- play a more important role in determining food tional source of risk. Somehigh-value agricultural prices and rural incomes, and more food is con- commodities also require significant investment, sumed from themarketplacerather than fromown- including the use of specific inputs. Fruit produc- production. The greater market orientation of food tion involves planting trees and waiting 3-5 years production and consumption has increased the for them to begin producing. Farmers in develop- bidirectional links between agriculture and nutri- ing countries, particularly poor farmers, often lack tion: agriculture still affectsnutrition, but food and the savingsor accesstocreditneeded to make these nutritional demandsincreasinglyaffectagriculture investments. In the case of highly perishable high- (Hawkes and Rue12006b).It is a twofold process. value commodities,production locationsnear mar- First, the increasing importance of the cash econ- kets and good marketing infrastructure are omy arising from changes in agricultural policy, particularly important (Torero and Gulati 2004). technology, and markets, and from rising incomes Smallfarmers are also less likely to enjoy access to and urbanization, is increasing the power of con- postharvest technologies. Yet the competitiveness sumers in the marketplace. Second,the rise of food The ChangingContextof Agriculture and Nutrition Linkages 57 marketinginstitutions,such as food processors,re- more opportunities for nutrition-focused agricul- tailers,and exporters,isreducingthepower of agri- tural interventions to improve the nutrition of net culturalproducers in the agriculturalsupplychain. food consumers rather than just net producers. Therising roleof themarket hasimplicationsfor There are also more opportunities for changing the relativeimportanceof eachof thepathwaysbe- foodconsumptionpatterns amongfoodconsumers tween agricultureand nutrition:ingeneral,thelink to be exploitedas a means of indirectlyimproving between agriculture and nutrition is becoming nutritional outcomes among producers (via in- more distant as income and food prices become come and price). Although not dealt with in this more important in determining food consumption chapter,it would alsobe important to take into ac- patterns relative to own-production. Agricultural count the impact of changing contexts on the em- programs with nutritional objectives need to take powerment of women agriculturists and the thischanging context into account.With the rising development of human capital,given their critical role of the consumer in the marketplace, there are role in improving nutritional outcomes. Institutional Frameworks for Action in the Agriculture Sector to Address Undernutrition Theviabilityof usingagriculturalinterventionsto improvehumannu- trition outcomes has been empiricallyestablishedby case studies and analyses like those presented in earlier chapters. These provide im- portant precedents with valuable lessonsfor the planning and design of agriculturalprograms and interventions.Whilenutritional statusit- self isan individual-levelattribute, the determinants of nutritionalsta- tus extend far beyond the control of the household of which the individual is a member. Institutions are identified as "basic" determi- nants of nutritional status in the UNICEF conceptualframework pre- sented in chapter 2. Government institutions establish policies and priorities and implement programs that affect nutritional outcomesat the aggregate national as well as at the household and individual lev- els. They can therefore be instrumental in ensuring that agricultural programs are effectivein meeting nationalnutritional goals. Agriculture ministries clearlyhave a central role to play in scaling up pilot agricultural programs and interventions, but experiencehas demonstrated the insufficiency of approaching nutrition entirely from theproduction side.Nutrition is,of course, alsoa consumption- side issue.Health and education,in particular, pertain to nutrition in relation to their essential roles in human capital formation and in human development. Yet prescribing systematic coordination be- tween different sector institutions as a means of achieving a more comprehensive approach to improved nutrition isproblematic,given thebureaucratic barriers that characterizetheadministrativedivision of responsibilities andjurisdictions between them. This chapter examines the barriers that inhibit sectorally-defined institutions from organizing and carrying out joint cross-sectoralef- forts to improve nutrition outcomes at a national level.It also identi- fiespossible opportunities to work around these barriers to achieve greater impacts that no onesectoral institution is capable of.Its focus is on government institutions, based on the assumption that govern- ments are chieflyresponsible for providing infrastructure, resources, and services to promote and maintain the social and economic wel- fareofitscitizens.The focuson governmentinstitutions is not to sug- gest that nongovernmental actors cannot make important contributions to improved nutrition. Nongovernmental organiza- tions oftenprovide many of the multisectoral goodsand servicesthat the undernourished require.Indeed, nongovernmental organizations were responsible for the success of a number of nutrition-oriented agricultural interventions reviewed in this report. Detailed analysis of the specificrole of nongovernmental organizations in effectively 60 From Agriculture to Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies, and Outcomes linking agricultural interventions to improved nu- health, education, agriculture, and trade. Theexer- tritionaloutcomesis, however,beyond the scopeof cise of political and administrative power follows this report. this framework, and resource allocations, incen- tives, and systems of accountability are managed accordingly. INSTITUTIONAL BARRIERSTO Theunderlying difficultiesconstraining agricul- COORDINATEDACTION IN ture and other sectoralinstitutionsfromeffectively NUTRITION acting in concert to address the problem of under- nutrition stem from the nature of the state bureau- The conceptual framework of the determinants of cracy. Most bureaucracies are not organized in a nutritional status is useful in identifying the sec- manner that facilitates broad, effective action toral institutions that are directly relevant to im- across sectors to address a problem. Even though proving nutrition and inmapping their rolesin any undernutrition might be the responsibility of the coordinated efforts to address nutrition issues. public sector,the sectoralorganizationof the pub- However,in thedetailsof undertakingtheseefforts licbureaucracy clearlyhinders undertaking the ac- within the bureaucracy of the state, the clarity of tion necessary. the frameworkisoftenlost,asbarriers tomounting To identify the bureaucratic elements that were harmonized efforts across the various sectors of found to impede efforts by the state to address un- state are encountered. dernutrition ina comprehensivecross-sectoralman- "Bureaucracy" has longcarried negative conno- ner, an institutional study of the linkages between tations of inflexible or convoluted procedures that agriculture and nutrition was carried out in Ghana, impede rather than facilitateeffectivecollectiveac- Mozambique,Nigeria,and Uganda asa component tion. Yet bureaucracies have emerged as a gener- of the Agriculture-Nutrition Advantage (TANA) ally successful solution to the problem of project describedin box 7.Thestudy identifiedfour managing the activitiesof statesand other large or- particularly important overlapping barriers that ganizations,being organized ideally on thebasisof prevent the problem of undernutrition from being clear goals, a rational coordinated functional spe- addressed by the agriculturalsectorjointly with the cialization of subunits, formal operating proce- health,education,and other relevantsectors:there- dures, and clear lines of authority. In virtually all sourceallocationand planning processeswithin the countries, the state is organized administratively bureaucracy, differingsector mandates and priori- within a bureaucratic framework of sector min- ties, differing sectoral worldviews, and capacity istries, which includes separate ministries for constraintsfor nutritional analysiswithin sectors. Institutional Frameworksfor Action in the Aericulture Sector to Address Undernutrition 61 RESOURCEALLOCA1-IONAND nated activitiesthat would achieveahigher levelof PLANNING impact. That being the case, the attainment of nu- trition objectiveswill tend not to be advanced by Resourceallocationprocessesof budgeting and per- routine sector planning mechanisms. In this re- sonnelmanagementoftenmakeitdifficulttomount gard, sectonvide approaches toplanning arelikely cross-sectoralactionwithin astatebureaucracy.Like to make efforts to address undernutrition in a co- all economicentities,the state functionsunder con- ordinated, cross-sectoralway evenmore difficultto ditionsof limited resources.Consequently,eachsec- undertake, as discussed in box 8. tor, in seeking to carry out its mandates, will compete with other sectors for the resources it re- quires.Typically,the resource allocation process of SECTOR MANDATESAND government is judged a zero-sumgame. For exam- PRIORITIES ple, a state-level nutritionist interviewed for the study in Nigeria noted that funding is at the coreof Formally stated mandates and objectives are im- why there is little interaction between the agricul- portant organizing mechanisms for bureaucracies ture and health sectors: since they help to define courses of action and to distinguish areas of institutional specialization "Everyone wants to be in charge. If [the within thebureaucracy asa whole.They definethe Health sector] writes proposals that include scopeof action for a sector or institution and serve some agricultural components, [theAgricul- toidentify theparticular, unique competenciesthat ture sector]is unhappy with Health, as Agri- the institution should possess to meet those objec- culture feels that Health is on their turf, tives. Thesepriorities also feed back into the plan- taking resources that should be theirs." ning systembecausethey are thebasisby whichan (Benson,forthcoming) institution or sector can make substantive claims Moreover,if independent assessmentsaremade on state resources. Moreover, for the individual of the way a sector made use of the resourcesit re- civil servant working in a sector ministry or ceived,sector-specificcriteriaaregenerallyused as agency, personal incentives such as career ad- the criteria. The resource allocation mechanisms vancement tend to revolve around the contribution provide no incentivesfor carrying outjoint coordi- that each makes to the attainment of these sector- 62 FromAgricullure to Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies, and Outcomes specific objectives, rather than broader, multisec- cannot be in disputeand any lackof successismore toral development goals. easily locked away in the ministry's cupboard." Theproblem for nutrition as a development pri- Attaining nutrition objectives clearly requires a ority is that addressing the problem of undernutri- range of action that is less neatly circumscribed tion may not be accepted by any one sector as a within a single sector. priority for which it is responsible and toward which it will allocate the resources it controls, in- UNIQUESECTORAL cluding human resources. Particularly as doing so requires engagement with other sectors to address WORLDVIEWS the problem sustainably, there arecompellingprag- The specialized training that sector specialists re- matic reasons for agricultural and other state insti- ceive tends to lead to discrete, nonoverlapping tutions to judge that it should not be among their areas of expertise and qualitatively different primary concerns. Improved nutrition can be de- worldviews. Knowledge and information that per- fined among a set of secondary objectivesfor a sec- tain directly to one's own discipline is selectively tor. However, with multiple objectives,the chances embraced, while other matters are discarded from of conflictemerging between the various objectives consideration as being irrelevant to the attainment of a sectoraremore likely.Someprioritization isre- of sector objectives. Agriculture-sector objectives quired. A senior agricultural researcher in Nigeria relate principally to increasing yields, profits, and noted that agriculturistshave historically been most other benefits that farmers deriveas producers. As concerned with raising yields and, second, with the such, the language and methods that agriculturists profitabilityoffarming.Certainly,they maybe will- will use, both in technical analyses and in imple- ing to take into account nutritional considerations, mentation of programs, will be quitedifferent from but at the end of the day, he asserted, increasing what are used in other sectors, such as health and crop yields is the principal criterion used to judge education. Nutrition considerations will not fit the effectiveness of agriculturists in Nigeria neatly or completely into the worldview of agri- (Benson et al. 2004). Consequently, one generally cultureor, for that matter, any of the core sectors of sees little evidence in the organization of the agri- government. cultural sector of any effectiveattention being paid The significance of this factor was observed in to what are seen as secondary concerns,such asnu- Mozambique, in which the Technical Secretariat trition. Thomson (1978) notes that most national- for Food Securityand Nutrition (SETSAN),across- level ministries prefer mandates that are entirely sectoral food security and nutrition coordination within their own sectoral sphere of influence and body for which the Ministry of Agriculture pro- control. "Such circumscribed objectives are much vided secretariat services, was seen by most ob- less time-consuming and much more easily admin- serverstoperformitsfunctions with regard to food istered; rivalries, jealousies, and frustrations are security issuesreasonably well.However, SETSAN lessened; and it is more satisfying to the personal had no nutrition experts among its staff and had ambition of the ministry staff; as credit for success not developed a conceptual approach to guide its Institutional Frdmeworksfor Action in the Agriculture Sector to Address Undernutrition 63 work in addressing malnutrition in the country. perverse,but reflect,first,a rational organizationof Consequently, despite its relative successesin ad- the stateintosectorsthat enableit to fulfillmany of dressing food security issues, because of difficul- its duties and, second, the fact that nutrition con- ties in defining how nutritional problems in the cerns fit poorly within this bureaucratic organiza- country should be addressed, SETSAN was felt to tion. Barriers also emerge because the areas of have generally failed to coordinate cross-sectoral expertise,the analyticalmethods, and the tools that effortsto address malnutrition (Bensonet al.2004). agriculturistsbring to the taskswith which they are Theobserved lackof cross-sectoralexchangeor un- charged arequite differentfrom many of thosethat derstanding asa factor impairing action to address are needed to address undernutrition comprehen- undernutrition is not uncommon. The lack of sively.For a broad effort to reduce undernutrition, shared perspectives, concepts, and practices fre- agriculture will need to overcome the many diffi- quently results in the various sectors that could culties of communication and coordination of ac- work jointly to address undernutrition finding it tivities across its sectoral boundaries. In the next difficult to find common ground from which to section, several approaches by which agriculture launch such efforts(Maxwelland Conway 2000). could institutionallyplay agreater rolein reducing undernutrition are assessed. CONSTRAINEDCAPACITY FOR NUTRITIONALANALYSIS INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMSTO ENABLEAGRICULTURISTSTO Identifying the cause of a nutritional problem is ADDRESS UNDERNUTRITION central to mounting effective action to address it. Ignoranceof what are the determinants of poor nu- The various institutional barriers that hamper the tritionalstatusand an inabilitytoascertainwhat re- agriculture sector from acting either alone or with sources and actions are needed to sustainably other sectors to effectively and sustainably reduce reduce undernutrition in a particular context are undernutrition are not easily overcome. Given part of the explanation for the inability of agricul- theseconstraints,it is unlikely that any singlesolu- turists or specialists in other sectors to address the tion to overcomingthem canbe found in mostcon- problem of undernutrition (Gillespie 2001). This texts. Rather, a more opportunistic, incremental was seen in all four countries in which the TANA approach will most likely yield more durable re- institutionalstudywas conducted.In Mozambique, ductions in undernutrition. This sectionconsiders fewerthan a dozen nutritionistshavemaster's level several possible components of efforts that the or higher backgrounds. In Nigeria, on the other agricultural sector could be a part of or undertake hand, the skillsof hundreds of professional nutri- on itsown to address undernutrition: multisectoral tionistshavenot been applied effectivelyacrosssec- nutrition planning agencies; cross-sector issues as tors, and no positive trends in undernutrition are policy priorities; the inclusion of nutrition objec- in evidence. In the agricultural sector in all four tives in agricultural activities;community-driven countries, staff with expertise in nutrition was development; and including nutrition topics in either absent(Nigeriaand Mozambique),withering agricultural training. (Uganda), or relatively isolated within the sector (Ghana)(Bensonet al.2004).Consequently,it isnot Multisector Nutrition PlanningAgencies necessarily surprising that the agriculture sectorin eachof these countries was seen to be contributing The cross-sectoral nature of the determinants of to improved nutrition only indirectly, if at all. nutritional statushas longbeen recognized.Acom- Buildingcapacityfor nutrition analysisamong spe- mon approach in grappling with the problems of cialists across sectors increasesthe probability that mounting necessary action to address undernutri- they will recognize the synergies that can be at- tion across disparate sectors has been to establish tained by undertaking effortsin concert. national multisectoral nutrition planning agencies Thebarriersto the agricultural sectorin most de- to ensure that coordinated efforts are undertaken. velopingcountries acceptingsomeof the responsi- However, of the many such agenciesthat were set bility for the problems of undernutrition in society up in the 1960sand 1970s,few catalyzed substan- arequitesubstantial. Manyof thesebarriers arenot tial reductions in malnutrition. Without any real 64 From Agriculture to Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies, and Ourcomes authority over the range of sectors involved, they trition. With sufficient authority and resources, proved ineffective in coordinating efforts across cross-sectoralcoordination bodies can ensure that these sectors. Moreover, as the political leaders proper incentives-both positive and negative- who championed their formation turned their at- are introduced to motivate sector institutions to tention toother issues,thematerialcommitmentof prioritizeactivitiesand allocateresourcestargeting government to address malnutrition dwindled, improved nutrition outcomes. Cross-sectoral and the agencies were starved of operational re- nutrition coordination bodies can operate the sources. Consequently, in the following decades, accountability mechanisms needed to ensure coordinated cross-sectoral programs to reduce that sector agencies carry out their mandated malnutrition in many countries were replaced by nutrition-related activities in alignment with sector-specificprojects focused primarily on tech- broader government strategies to address malnu- nical nutrition interventions (Levinson2000). trition. Moreover, such agencies should be ex- Such multisectoral coordination agencies re- pected to continually engage in relevant national main a common feature of national strategies to and sectoralpolicy processes,including in agricul- address undernutrition. Few of these agencies ture, to ensure that undernutrition continues to be establishedin recentyears demonstrate any greater viewed by politicalleaders and sectormanagers as success than those created 30 to 40 years ago. a development priority (WorldBank 2006a). Mozambique, Nigeria, and Uganda have estab- lished such agenciesduring the past 5 to 10years, Cross-Sector Issues as Policy Priorities with no evidence of greater or more effective im- pacts on malnutrition than in Ghana, in which no Inanormative sense,formalpoliciesdefinein quite such agency is in place (Benson,forthcoming).The explicit terms what is considered the common challengesof cross-sectoralcoordinationremain as good for the citizensof a nation and serve as state- daunting now as they were in the past, with agen- ments of how government intends to prioritize its cies generally lacking adequate authority or actionsand its expenditures. Formal statements of resources to introduce incentives to compel cross- policy are arguably more important for defining sector coordination. priorities when related to issues, such as nutrition In reflecting on why many such attempts at co- issues, that fall outside of sector-specificinterests. ordinating efforts to address undernutrition have Whereassector-specificmandates and worldviews been unsuccessful,a clear problem relates to these serve to motivate action to address issues that fall agencies' scope of action. The agenciesfrequently within the competenciesof a single sector,such in- have been too involved in implementation, partic- centives are absent for cross-sectoral issues. ularly when they have insufficientauthority to di- Makingitclear that theprioritiesof governmentin- rect how the sectors concerned actually go about clude mounting effective action to reduce under- their tasks. Heaver (2005) suggests that a better nutrition is one way in which sector priorities can arrangement would be to allow the sectors the lat- be swayed toward paying closer attention to the itude and resources to carry out their own pro- needs of the undernourished.Public resource allo- grams, with the nutrition coordination agency cations to the agriculture sector may be made con- being granted the necessary authority to define tingent on how much the sector has contributed overall policies and strategies and to guide the al- and plans to contribute to the attainment of location of resources. Government should make broader development objectives, such as those ar- use of the existingsectoral infrastructure to imple- ticulated in a master development plan or a ment programs, however imperfectit may be, and Poverty Reduction Strategy. This can put in place build on what is already in place (Kennedy 1994). stronger incentives for agriculturists to formulate A lesson that seems to have been widely recog- work plans that gobeyond their traditional narrow nized, if not widely learned, is to "plan multi-sec- sectoral objectives. With that objective in mind, torally, but implement sectorally" (Maxwell and Ugandan nutritionists participated effectively in Conway 2000). 2004 in revising the Poverty Eradication Action As such, multisectoral coordination agencies Plan, the government's master development strat- have a place in the implementation of government egy, resulting in heightened attention to undernu- strategies to sustainably reduce levels of undernu- trition within this broader policy (Benson et al. Frameworksfor Action in the A~ricultureSector to AddressUndernutrition 65 2004). However, follow-up research is needed to enhance nutritional knowledge within farming determine whether the increasedemphasis on nu- households. Although their success in contribut- trition in thispolicy actually hasled toincreased at- ing to improved nutritional outcomes varies de- tention to the problem of undernutrition in the pending on the pathways by which the desired annual work plans of the various state sectors in nutritional effects are obtained, such activities do Uganda or in the allocation of resources to attain compel their implementers in the agricultural sec- improved nutrition objectives. tor to undertake nutritional analyses to identify For such high-level policy statements to influ- the nutritionally vulnerable in the population in encesectoralefforts to address undernutrition, sus- which they work and to diagnose the causes of tained interest by political leaders in attaining that malnutrition. Such analyses, if conducted in broad improved nutritional outcomesis required. an informed manner, will highlight the important Politicalchampionsfor theattainment of improved contribution that agricultural initiativescan make nutrition are needed: individuals who are politi- in assistingthe undernourished, the need for com- cally well connected, are persistent in character, plementary actionon the part of other sectors,and and have accesstomany of the multiple arenas and the importance of improved nutrition as an input institutional venues in which policy debates are to a more productive agricultural sector.With suf- undertaken. Such champions have been shown to ficient political support, initial efforts by agricul- be a key element in several instancesin which sig- turists to contribute to improved nutrition should nificantchangeswerebrought about in thepriority increase in scope and complexity as the determi- given to state efforts to combat undernutrition nants of improved nutrition are increasinglymade (Rokx 2000). Similarly, international donors can clear to those involved through practice. The nu- provide important incentives by providing fund- trition objectives of agricultural activities can fos- ingand capacitybuildingopportunities to agencies ter a more holistic vision of what is needed across in the agricultural sector or other sectors so that the various public sectors to sustainably improve they can work toward reducing the numbers of the nutrition. However, progress in this regard is not undernourished in a country or area. However, if assured, as the example in box 9 shows. implemented in a one-off fashion, the sustainabil- ity of such changes is open to question (Winikoff Community-Driven Development 1978).If attention to undernutrition enjoyed a high profilein national policy process or in donor prior- Community-directed efforts also can provide im- ities, subsequent changes in leadership of govern- portant incentivesfor agriculturiststocontributeto ment or of donor organizations often result in a efforts to reduce undernutrition, often working in diminished profile for nutrition as a development concert with other sectors.Community-driven de- objective. Continual strategic advocacy for nutri- velopment (CDD)gives control of many local de- tion action thus becomes an important element if velopment activities to those who will be most agriculture and other sectors are to undertake ac- affectedby them, the local residents (Dongieret al. tions at a level and for a length of time sufficientto 2003). When governments support such efforts, bring about substantive reductions in the numbers they usually also commit to contributing state re- of undernourished in the population. sources and expertise to the community as its members work to realize their development ambi- tions.However,communitiesare unlikely toprior- Nutrition Objectives for Agricultural itize their development needs neatly according to Activities unique sectoral competencies (Mason 2000).That Activities with clear nutrition implications in the being the case, community expectations that state agricultural sector have been the focus of much agencies will help them address a problem requir- of the technical content of this report. These in- ingcontributionsfrom multiplesectors,suchasun- clude the production and consumption of staple dernutrition, provide important incentives for food crops, fruits and vegetables, and animal cross-sectoralaction to be undertaken. In instances products that are rich in micronutrients or other- in which governments are strongly committed to wise contribute to a high-quality diet and the supporting community-driven efforts, there may use of agricultural communication channels to be sufficient incentivesfrom community demands 66 From Agriculture to Nutrition: Pdthwdys,Synerg~es,and Oulcomes Progressive increased attention to nutrition within cultural production-oriented, most home economists agriculture is not assured. Agricultural extension ser- were eliminated from extension services. vices offer a case in point. Such servicesprovide a Moreover, the service has also become more male channel for reaching rural smallholder households dominated as a result. That is due to gender sortingin with information on how they might provide better school, in which boys are more likely than girls to fol- care to their nutritionally vulnerable members. In the low the natural sciences-focused courseof study neces- 1970sand f 98Qs,recognizingthis, many extension saryto attain professional qualifications in agriculture. services in Sub-Saharan Africa, including Ghana and Several importantdeterminantsof nutritional status Uganda, inciuded among their fieldworkers home have stronglygendered characteristics, particularly economists, most of whom were women. Their func- breastfeeding,weaning, childcare, and meal prepara- tion was primarily to work with women in farming tion. Consequently, although information on such nutri- households on both production and consumption is- tion concerns may still featureamong information that sues, includingnutrition. However, during the past 20 extension agents offer to farminghouseholds, male ex- years, most extension services have been reorganized, tension agents are a poor choice as messenger on these including through programs of "professionalization," topics. We should expect that the level and quality of whereby field extension agents had to meet minimum knowledge on nutrition obtained by farming house- professional qualifications to be retained in the ser- holds from extension agentscertainly has not improved vice. Because these qualificationswere primarily agri- with the restructuringof extension services. for cross-sectoral activities to flourish despite the African countries, district-level agriculturists bureaucratic organization of the sectors.For exam- stated that local concerns were not necessarily ple, community nutrition programs that involve more important than sectoral concerns in guiding cross-sectoral teams from government agencies in their actions (Benson et al. 2004). These agricul- providing community facilitation services have led turists were still subordinate to sectoral superiors, to substantial reductions in undernutrition in sev- they operated with limited resources, and many eralAsian countries (Tontisirinand Gillespie 1999). of the incentives that motivated their individual Moreover, the local scale at which action will efforts hampered rather than fostered cross-sec- be taken by the agents of the various public sec- toral action to assist communities. Consequently, tors concerned also may enable such action to be although community-driven development may performed more easily. The resource conflicts be- promote increased attention from agriculturists to tween sectors that were noted as constraining local nutrition problems, there is no guarantee cross-sectoral undertakings typically play out at that it will do so. the national level in most countries. At more local levels, civil servants may have more limited con- Nutrition in Agricultural Training trol over how resource allocations are made across the sectors. However, the ability of local- As was shown earlier in the review chapters, agri- level state agencies to work collaboratively in as- culture may provide important elements neces- sisting communities will vary on a case-by-case sary for sustained improvements to nutritional basis. In both Ghana and Uganda, countries in status in specific contexts, particularly among which the decentralization of state functions has farming populations. If improving nutrition is a progressed to a greater extent than in most other high priority development objective of govern- lnsritutional Frameworksfor Action in the Acricullure Sector lo Address Undernutrition 67 ment, attaining that objective will require a more lems, demonstrates that there isconsiderable merit sophisticated understanding of the determinants in being task or problem oriented, starting small, of improved nutrition by professionals in the pub- achieving short-term goals, and building on these lic sectors concerned. Providing training in successes iteratively to address larger problems human nutrition to agriculturists is an important (Maxwell and Conway 2000). component of this objective. Whatever the sector Coordinated cross-sectoral efforts may be nec- or sectors, "the choice of the most appropriate in- essary to sustainably reduce undernutrition. tervention will depend on who is malnourished However, given the past failure of such efforts, and why" (Kennedy 1994). Providing training in new initiatives should first be piloted before being nutritional analysis will make it more likely that scaled up, particularly in those institutional envi- agricultural projects and programs that seek to ronments in which bureaucratic structures and improve the nutritional status of the target popu- processes are rigid. In such cases, "contrary to log- lation will be based on a clear conceptual and an- ical argument, the complex etiology of malnutri- alytical framework for the way the nutritional tion does not necessarily demand a complex goals will be attained. Similarly, it will also allow response" (Ross and Posanai, cited in Levinson for better identification and understanding of the 1995).Individual sectoral responses will often be needs of the undernourished that the agricultural the best that can be realistically expected. No nu- sector can assist in meeting and enable better trition program at the outset should depend on in- monitoring of project performance in meeting tersectoral coordination for its success. The risk those needs. However, few countries, if any, now that such coordination is not going to happen is require that their agricultural trainees acquire a too great (Levinson 1995). In instances in which basic understanding of the determinants of im- cross-sectoral action is required, alternative part- proved nutrition. ners to other sectors in the state bureaucracy, such as NGOs, may offer greater potential for success. However, simply ensuring that the agriculture CONCLUSIONS sector, or, for that matter, any other sector with a The institutional barriers that agriculturists, partic- role to play in improving nutrition, takes that role ularly those in the public sector, face in trying to seriously is an important first step. Coordinated mount effectiveaction toassist the undernourished effortsshould follow only once such commitments are durable and strong. The fact that the organiza- are clear. tion of these institutions is relatively ineffectivefor Moreover, the causes of undernutrition are addressing the problem of undernutrition in soci- context specific. Agriculturists need to be clear ety isunlikely to be sufficientlycompelling to cause about what they can contribute in resolving mal- these institutional structures or the manner in nutrition in a particular context. Having this clear which they operate to change. Consequently, al- understanding not only guides program design, though strong action by the agricultural sector or but it also enables agriculturists to evaluate broad coordinated action by several sectors may whether means other than agriculture might logically appear to be required to reduce levels of be more efficient in attaining specific goals of undernutrition, in practice an opportunistic ap- nutritional improvement. There are likely to be proach may be more effective. Such a strategy significant opportunity costs associated with agri- would use existing individual activities in the agri- culturists devoting their energies to nutrition cultural sector and in other sectors in an instru- objectives (Pinstrup-Andersen 1982).These costs mental way to address important context-specific need to be evaluated. Consequently, capacity for determinants of undernutrition. Working in this nutrition analysis is critical to any planning by incremental manner appears more likely to be suc- agriculturists to address aspectsof the problem of cessful than mounting a large-scale cross-sectoral undernutrition. effort that is a poor match for the institutional The undernourished can improve their nutri- framework in which it would be implemented tional status through agricultural means. Thereare (Lynch 1979).Experience from many cross-sectoral many good reasons for providing incentives to efforts, focused on both nutrition and other prob- agriculturists to address problems of undernutri- 68 FromAcriculfure to Nutrition: Pathwavs. Svnercies. and Oulcomes tion in a dedicated manner. However, Levinson benefits to which agriculture can contribute forces (1995)suggests that the reverse relationship is also the sector to considermore rigorously who benefits important. "Increased agricultural production per from increased agricultural productivity and to seis insufficientif that production does not address change its priorities and activities where necessary hunger and malnutrition through itsproduction or in light of these considerations. consumption effects." Attention to the nutrition Lessons Learned and Next Steps This report analyzes what has been learned about the way agricul- tural interventions influencenutrition outcomes in low- and middle- income countries. It synthesizes lessons from past institutional and organizational efforts and identifies developmentsin agriculture and nutrition that have transformed the context in which nutrition out- comes are affected by agriculture. Emerging from this analysis is the fact that agriculture carries real potential to contribute to improved nutritional outcomes.Agricultural programs should thus includenu- trition asa specificobjectiveand a clear plan of how to implement nu- trition-sensitive agricultural interventions and how to achieve impact. The experience of agricultural programs that have done so points to a number of general lessons. The very inclusion of nutri- tional objectives by these programs reflects an implicit recognition that investing in agricultural production and growth does not neces- sarily result in improved nutrition. Nor do improved nutrition out- comes flow automatically from increased agricultural production, lower food prices, or higher incomes. Although these pathways may be instrumental in satisfying a number of necessary conditions for improved nutrition, they are not in themselves sufficient. The persis- tence of malnutrition despite the generally overwhelming success of food production belies any notion that the solution to adverse nutri- tion outcomes is attainable through the production side alone. Nutritional criteria have to be explicitly incorporated into the design of agricultural programs if nutritional objectives are embraced and if food production is to effectively answer the demand for foods with particular nutritional qualities.That represents both a challenge and an opportunity for agriculture and its major actors. Incorporating nonagricultural criteria such as health and nutrition into the design and conduct of agricultural programs suggests devel- oping aneffectiveinterfacebetween agricultural and other institutions. Yet systematic hgh-level coordination between different sector rnin- istries is challenging, given the bureaucratic barriers that divide them. The report therefore examined alternative approaches to formulating a more comprehensiveapproach to improving nutrition as a develop- ment objective.The prominence of nutrition as a policy priority in na- tional development plans and poverty reduction strategies may provide a useful startingpoint.At thislevel,nutritional objectives tran- scend the administrative divisionsbetween different government-sec- tor institutions whle still requiring their respective contributions. 70 From Acriculture to Nulrilion: Pathwavs. Svnercies. and Outcomes Those institutions may find and capitalize on op- vested broadly in improving human capital and that portunities to work together, but their effective in- sustained and increased the livelihood assets of the puts should not be contingent on such active poor. Below we summarize the key lessons learned collaboration coming to pass. In this light,programs about how these programs should be developed and policies can be planned multisectorally, yet be and implemented to help achieve improved nutri- carried out sector by sector. Insofaras sector institu- tional outcomes. The recommendations should be tions are held accountable for their performance in implemented taking the changing context of agri- achieving improved nutritional outcomes this ac- culture and nutrition into account, and they should countability will provide them with incentives to be accompanied by the investments in human capi- explicitly address undernutrition within their re- tal and institutional changes needed for successful spective mandates and work programs. implementation. Sector ministries compete for limited govern- Trlke loci11co~ltextsitlto uccourlt. Designing pro- ment resources. If their budgetary allocations are grams to accommodate prevailing agricultural and made contingent on their contribution to reducing nutritional conditions entails developing a sound malnutrition as a national policy priority, their ef- understanding of producers' priorities, incentives, fectiveness in that role is more likely to become an assets,vulnerabilities,and livelihood strategies.This institutional priority as well. Similarly, interna- isall too familiar to agriculturalplanners and can be tional donors can provide important incentives by said of virtually any agricultural intervention. The offering funding and capacity building opportuni- need to evaluate and target major nutritional prob- ties to agencies in the agricultural sector or other lemsexperienced by thecommunity inprogram de- sectors so that they work toward reducing the sign is less familiar, but is an essential requirement numbers of undernourished in a country or area. for any agricultural intervention that has nutrition- To improve thechances of that happening, agricul- related objectives. Understanding the motives and tural institutions should develop the internal ca- constraints that affecthousehold consumption deci- pacity to analyze thenutritional implications of the sions is in this sense no less important than under- programs they plan. standing those that affectproduction decisions. The context in which agricultural programs are Many of these factors relate to household eco- implemented is shifting as agricultural and trade nomics and to local perspectives of socioeconomic policies change, as new technologies are intro- realities.Some,however, are attributable to cultural duced, and as food marketing systems develop. norms that in and of themselves have little if any- These changes, which generally work to increase thing to do with economics-but that may bear the market orientation of agriculture, affect the heavily on the rationales behind households' eco- pathways linking agriculture to nutrition by alter- nomic decisions. They may determine outright ing the types and quality of the foods available in which household members maintain control over the marketplace, the price of food, the income of which household resources and may influence nu- food producers, and the amount of food consumed tritionally vital decisions such as the allocation of from own-production. They are also affecting non- different quantities and types of food among house- food factors that contribute to nutritional improve- hold members. From that angle, women emerge as ments, suchashuman capital.In addition, changing vitally important agents, both in their roles as pro- food consumption patterns affect the market de- ducers and as custodians of household welfare. mand that agricultural production seeks to satisfy. Their importance, moreover, generally increases in These changes present program planners with a the lowest-income settings and among households moving target in tailoring programs to fit local real- with high dependency ratios-in which a large ities. They also present practitioners and policy proportion of household members are nonearning makers with new factors to consider as they seek to and often nutritionally vulnerable dependents. replicate successful experiences across localities Beginning with pilot programs and conscientiously and scale them up to provincial and national levels. employing evaluation criteria before going to scale The empirical evidence presented in this report can be a particularly effective way to ensure that focused on agricultural programs and interventions local contexts are taken into account. carried out at the level of local communities. The Eiiublt.ui~denlpori1er 7c~omerl.The resources and in- most successful such projects were those that in- come flows that women control wield dispropor- Lessons Learned and Nexr Steos 71 tionately positive impactson household health and tionately afflict children and increase their risk of nutrition. In some parts of the world, women tend dying. Agricultural extension services and public to lack access to economic opportunities outside information campaigns such as those dealing with the domestic sphere to which traditional customs integrated pest management arealso important ve- often confine them, especially in rural areas. They hicles for conveying health-related information. are also very often severely constrained by time Nutrition-related educationand communication and the multiplmften simultaneous-roles they strategies mayoffer instruction onfood preparation play asproducers and caregivers.Agricultural pro- and safety,child careand feeding practices,and the grams and policies that empower and enable nutritional qualities of different foods. A woman women and that involve them in decisions and ac- armed with information that enables her to recog- tivities throughout the life of the program achieve nize the symptoms of a vitamin A deficiency and greater nutritional impacts. Such programs in- who has learned about key sources of this nutrient crease women's control over incomeand other pro- is better placed to make an appropriate dietary ad- ductive resources like credit by targeting them in justment--especially when she has participated in their roles as economic agents. an agricultural program involving a food source It~corporaterlntritio~~orltreacl~atzd belzauior chntzge. that can be applied to that nutrient deficiency. A Using information services to change the behavior woman equipped with knowledge that enables her of producers in order to make them more produc- to recognize a particular medical condition is like- tive or better able to respond to market signals is fa- wise by definition better placed to treat it or to miliar to agricultural practitioners. Similar know when the affected family member should be information servicescanbe employed to change be- taken to a health service provider. havior among people in their roles as consumers Information is something that is required from and as decision makers within their households. households and communities aswell as something Women's access to services can be as important to to be made available to them. The subjective eco- household nutrition as their access to income and nomic, social, and cultural reasons that underlie productive assets.Access to health servicesis a nat- household production and consumption decisions ural priority, but even this access presupposes that are largely inaccessibleto program personnel from people know when to avail themselves of such ser- outside the participating community. Indigenous vices.Informationservicescaneducate women both knowledge and livelihood strategies are very often in theirroles aseconomicagentsand as typically the unspoken and may encompass local understand- principal stewards of household nutrition, food se- ing of opportunitiesand risks that carry important curity, and health. While women are by no means practical merit for nutrition programming-merit the sole intended audience of such knowledge, tar- that may very well not be obvious to the outside geting women with health and nutrition informa- observer. In areas in which community-based, tion is likely to have even greater catalytic effect, local civil society or nongovernmental organiza- given their typically closer affiliation with the tions are active, they may represent important household. sources of information on local perspectives and People who are armed with information and present agricultural programs with valuable part- knowledge about the nutritional significanceof the nerships with which to engage local communities. foods they produce and eat are able to make better Community-based organizations represent impor- production and consumption decisions. Health in- tant reservoirs of social capital and are embedded formation services provide a potent means of in target communities in which community mem- changing behaviors to reduce the high levels of bers make collectivedecisions about how local re- childhood morbidity that are associated with inap- sources are to be used and how livelihoods are to propriate feeding practices, premature weaning, be advanced. Other organizations that have oper- and childcare generally. Providing households ated for years in local communities are likely to with health information about sanitary food prepa- have established relationships of intimate trust and ration and water use and the prevention of infec- rapport with families and individuals in localcom- tious and food-borne diseases can dramatically munities and are able tolisten tolocalconcerns and improve nutrition outcomes-particularly with re- advise on possible resolutions. These can be con- spect to those diarrheal illnesses that dispropor- duits of two-way information flows between pro- 72 From Agriculture to Nutrilion: Pathways, Synergies, and Outcomes gram administrators and community members Next Steps. There are a number of important is- and are often well-situated to serve as agents in suesnot covered in thispaper that deserve separate monitoring and evaluation. Local organizations, investigation and analysis. The effects of climate moreover, are often relatively free of the sectoral change and the implications of agricultural pro- divisions of higher-level bureaucracies and may duction shiftingfromfood products to biofuelsare employ agriculturists and health and nutrition ex- matters of serious concern forfood security,health, perts from local government agencies who are well and nutrition. Analysis of their potential impacts aware of each other's activities, concerns, and pri- on foodproduction and prices suggests itself as an orities and, as such, can operate in a more effective important object of future research. and coordinated manner. The experienceof past and ongoing agricultural An additional lesson learned through the review interventions with nutrition-related objectives and is that poor prodrtcers shorlld be provideif ~oitlrlrelparlif the connections between agricultural production srtpport to respotrd to clzatzgi?rgfoocl corrsrltriptiowpat- and nutrition more broadly, shed light on a num- terrrs.Anticipating and responding to changing de- ber of variables and causal dynamics that agricul- mand is a vital imperative for farmers in general, tural practitioners should take into account when but among poor farmers in developing countries planning programs or providing policy advice. the stakes are particularly high. A significant part Focusing the crosshairs of production goals onto of their production is intended for their house- nutrition-related targets is something that agricul- hold's own consumption and therefore much of the tural planners are likely to be called upon to do demand they are satisfying is their own. With re- more often, for there is good reason to anticipate spect to the proportion of food they produce for that nutritional aims will come to play more promi- market, the changing agricultural context has im- nently in the calculus by which the value of agri- portant implications for the prices they arepaid for cultural programs are rated. Future agricultural their products, and increasing demand for high- programs implemented with nutrition objectives value food sources represents an important oppor- will need to address the real challenge of going to tunity to earn more income. Yet switching to new scale and should be carefully monitored and rigor- and unfamiliar crops and producing for foreign ously evaluated to ensure that performance can be markets with stringent food quality and safety re- continually tracked and improved. It is hoped that quirementsare also fraught with risk, and both op- the expository account offered in this report lays portunities and risks need to be addressed by the groundwork for more practical work in which agricultural programs. the details of applying these lessons operationally can be prescribed. METHODOLOGY USED IN CHAPTER Third, we searched forward (Web of Science cited 3 (STAPLES) reference search) from three previous reviews (Kennedy et al. 1992;DeWalt 1993;Berti et al. 2004 The followingsearcheswere carried outfor thepurposes and evaluated resulting studies for relevance. of the literature review. In addition, in February 2007,a number of websites The most recently published review (Berti et al. were searched for project results papers, including 2004)employed adocumented search strategy with the following: search date of November 2001. We repeated their - BioversityInternational(formerlythe search to cover the years 2001-2007, with slight International Plant Genetic Research modifications to their search terms (below). We Institute and the International Network searched in PubMed and in Science Citation Index for the Improvement of Banana and Expanded andSocialSciencesCitation Index (latter Plantain): http:/ /www.bioversity two via Web of Science). This search was very international.org/ broad and yielded approximately 1,700 items in- - CollaborativeCropResearchProgram: dexed in Medline and approximately 1,800 items http:/ /mcknight.ccrp.cornell.edu/ indexed in Web of Science. projects/nutrition.html - (agricult*OR "sustainable development" OR - Foodand Agriculture Organization: "rural development" OR "food production" OR http:/ /www.fao.org/documents/ farm*)AND (nutriti*OR anthropom*OR diet* - HarvestPlusProgram: OK "child growth") http:/ /www.harvestplus.org/ - Searchlimits alsoexcluded studieswith animals - HealthbridgeCanada (formerly as subjects;search date March 2007. Programme for Appropriate Technology in Health, Canada): http://www. In addition, to ensure that no relevant studies were healthbridge.ca/foodandnutrition~e.cfm missed, we supplemented with Medline searches - InternationalCenterforResearchon using the following terms: Women: http://www.icrw.org/ - nutriti*ANDagricultureAND(trialORinterve* - International Food Policy Research OR effect*or effic' OR program OR policy) - "foodsecurity" ANDagricultureAND(trialOR Institute: http://www.ifpri.org/ International Fund for Agricultural interve* OR effect* or effic* OR program OR - Development: http:/ /www.ifad.org/ policy) - Theselatter twosearchesyielded 105items and - Michigan State University, Towards Sustainable Nutrition Improvement overlapped with the broader searches. Project:http://www.aec.msu.edu/fs2/ tsni/index.htm FromAericulture lo Nutrition: Palhwavs.Svnercies. and Outcomes METHODOLOGY USED IN Assessment"[MeSH]OR Dietary Guideline OR School-based intervention OR Program CHAPTER 4 (FRUITSAND OR Intervention OR Promotion OR Policy VEGETABLES) OR Nutrition Education OR Prevention OR "Education"[MeSH] OR "Behavior"[MeSH] Databases OR "Marketing"[MeSH] OR Mass-media OR "Schools"[MeSH] OR Astructured electronicsearchof the PubMed data- "Communication"[MeSH] OR "Intervention base was conducted. It included publications from Studies"[MeSH]OR "Public Policy"[MeSH] 1980to January2007.Other limitsincluded human OR "Randomized Controlled Trialsn[MeSH] studies in the following languages: English, OR "Health Education"[MeSH] OR French, Italian, and Spanish. Significant efforts "Government Programs"[MeSH] OR were also made to identify other studies through "National Health Programs"[MeSH] OR searches in the "gray literature" by accessingrele- "Health Promotion"[MeSH] OR "Nutrition vant Web sites. In addition, a number of experts Policy"[MeSH] OR "prevention and con- from various internationalorganizationswere con- trol"[Subheading] OR "Guidelines"[MeSH] tacted through e-mail to ask for copies of reports OR Impact OR EfficacyOR Effectiv* documenting their experiences. The obtained re- ports were included in this review. Additional Inclusion/exclusion criteria: Only high-quality publications were obtained by going through the studieswere included, that is, those that had an ex- references of the retained publications to identify perimental or quasi-experimental design for which those that were relevant for this topic. Finally, a the intervention was clearly described and that in- number of articles and reports were obtained from cluded tests of statistical significancein the impact colleagues who already had articles available that analysis. had been compiled for previous reviews. Searches Search Terms The PubMed search using the search string listed After extensive testing, the following string of above resulted in a total of 188 articles. All were search terms proved the most effectivein identify- subjected to a title and abstract scan for relevance, ing the relevant literature: and a total of 72 were found to be relevant. They were evaluated in more detail, and a total of 26 of ("Nutrition Disorders"[MeSH] OR these articles were obtained in full-paper form for "Nutritional Status"[MeSH])AND inclusion in this document. Severalof these papers ("Agriculture"[MeSH] OR Horticulture were background or historic documents that did OR Garden) AND ("Nutrition not report on a specificintervention. Adamson, P. 2004. "Vitamin and Mineral Deficiency: A Global Badiane, 0 . 2000. "The Effects of Liberalization on Food Markets in Progress Report." The Micronutrient Initiative and UNICEF. Africa." In Agricrrltrtrnl Morkets Beyond Libernlizntiotl, ed. A. van Adato, M., and K.Mei~uen-Dick.2007. Agricrrltrrrnl Resenrclr, Lir~cliltoods, Tilburg, H. A. J. Moll, and A. Kuyvenhoven. Dordrecht: Kluwer ntrd Porlerty. Stridies of Ecor~ottiicnrld Socinl Impncts it1 Six Corrtrtries. Academic Publishers. Baltimore, MD. The Joh~isHopkins University Press for IFPRI Baenzinger, P. S., W. K. Russell, G. L.Graef, and B. T. Campbell. 2006. (International Food Policy Research Institute). "Improving Lives: 50 Years of Crop Breeding, Genetics, and Ahmad, M., C. Cororaton, A. Qayyum, M. Iqbal, and P. Dorosh. 2006. Cytology." Crop Science46: 2230-44. "Impact of Domestic Policies towards Agricultural Trade Banejee, A. V., and E. Duflo. 2006. "The Economic Livesof the Poor." Liberalization and Market Reform on Food Security in Pakistan." MIT Department of Eco~iomicsWorkilig Paper No. 06-29. SSRN: lFPRl (International Food Policy Research Institute), Washington, http://ssni.com/abstract=942062. DC (photocopy). Barghouti, S., S. Kane, K. Sorby, and M. Ali. 2004. "Agricultural Ahmed, M. M., M. Jabbar, and S. Ehui. 2000. "Household-Level Diversification for the Poor: Guidelines for Practitioners." Eco~iomicand Nutritional Level Impacts of Market-Oriented Dairy Agriculture and Rural Developmelit Discussion Paper 1. World Production in the Ethiopian Highlands." Fwd nrld Nrrtritiotr Bulletirl Bank, Washington, DC. 21 (4):460-65. Bazzano, L. A. 2004. "Dietary Intake of Fruits and Vegetables and Alderman, H. 1987. "Cooperative Dairy Development in Karnataka, Dietary Risk of Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Diseases India: An Assessment." Research Report 64. IFPRl (International (CVD)." Backgroulid Document 4-b. Prepared for the Joint Food I'olicy Research Institute), Washington, DC. FAO/WHO Workshop on Fruit and Vegetables for Health, Kobe, Alderman, J., J. Hoddinott, L. Haddad, and C. Udry. 1995. "Gender Japan,September 1-3,2004. Differentials in Farm Productivity: lmplicatio~isfor Household Begum, J. M. 1994. The Impact of Dairy Development on Protein and Efficiency and Agricultural Policy." lFPRI (International Food Calorie Intake of Pre-School Children. Indin111Med Science48 (3): Policy Research Institute), Washington, DC. 61-64. Allen, L. 2003. "Animal Source Foods to Improve Micronutrient Bell, A. C., K. Ge, and B. M. Popkin. 2002. "The Road to Obesity or the Nutrition an11 Human Function in Developing Countries." Jo~lrtlnl Path to Prevention: Motorized Transportation and Obesity in of Nrrtritiorr 133:3875S78S. China." ObesityResenrcll 10(4):27743. Allen, L., and S. Gillespie. 2001. Wlurt Works?A R~vie~voftlleEfficncynnd Bell, A. C., K. Ge, and B. M. Popkin. 2001. "Weight Gain and Its Effctirierrcss of Nutritior~[~tterr~o~tio~rs.Geneva: United Nations Predictors in Chinese Adults." Inter~tntiorcnljo~irnnlof Obesity ncrd Administrative Committee on Coordination, Sub-committee on Relnted Metnbolic Disorders 25 (7): 1079-86. Nutrition, in collaboratio~iwith the Asian Development Bank. Benson, T. Forthcoming. "Cross-Sectoral Coordi~iatio~iFailure: How Aphane, J., M.L. Chadha, and M.O. Oluoch. 2003. "Increasing the Significant a Constraint ill National Efforts to Tackle Malnutrition Consumption of Micronutrient-rich Foods through Production and in Africa?" Foodnrld N~itritionBlrlletin. Promotion of Indigenous Foods." AVRDC (Asian Vegetable Benson, T., T. Palmer, R. Satcher, and C.Johnson-Welch. 2004. Crossing Research and Development Center)-The World Vegetable Center. Borindnries to Reduce Mnln~itrition? An Institritionnl Study of Tainan, Taiwan. Agricrrltlrren~rdNrrtritiort in Ugcandn,Mommbiq~ie,Nigerin,nrld Ghnn. Athukorala, P., and D. Sen. 1998. "Processed Food Exports form Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute. Developing Countries: Patterns and Determinants." Food Policy 23 Berti, P. R, J. Krasevec, and S. FitzGerald. 2004. "A Review of the (1):41-54. Effectiveness of Agriculture Interventions in lmprovitig Nutrition Attig, G. A., S. Simtasiri, K. Ittikom, and S. Dahanamitta. 1993. Outcomes." Prlblir Heolth Nutrition 7 (5):599409. "Promoting Homestead Gardeningtoco~itrolVitamin A Deficiency Bhagwati, J. N. 1993. 1r1dinin Trnrlsition:Freeirrg tlre Economy. Oxford: in North-Eastern Thailand." Food, Nrrtrition nrrd Agricrrltrrre7: 1825. Clarendon Press. Ayalew, W., Z. W. Gebriel, and H. Kassa. 1999a. "Reducing Vitamin A Bhat, R.V., and S. Vasanthi. 1999."Mycotoxin Contamination of Foods Deficiency in Ethiopia: Linkages with a Women-Focused Dairy Goat and Feeds." Working documelit of the Third Joint FAO/WHO/ Farming Project." Research Report No. 4. Center for Research on UNEP International Conference on Mycotoxins. MYC-ONF/99/ Women (ICRW)/Opportunities for Micronutrient I~itewentions 4a, Tunis, Tunisia. (OMNI), Washington, DC. Binswanger, H. P., and J. VOII Braun. 1991."Technological Change and Ayalew, W., Z. W. Gebriel, and H. Kassa. 1999b. "Improving Vitamin Commercialization in Agriculture: The Effect on the Poor." World A Intake through a Woman-Focused Dairy Goat Development Br~rlkResenrcllObserver6 (1): 57-80. Project in Ethiopia." Research Report Series No. 4. ICRW/OMNI Birthal, P.S., P. K. Joshi, and A. Gulati. 2006. "Vertical Coordination in (Internatio~ialCenter for Research on Women/Opportunities for High-Value Food Con~modities:Implications for Smallholders." Micronutrient Interventions), Washington, DC. Draft Research Report. IFPRl (International Food Policy Research Institute), Washington, DC. From Agricultureto Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies,and Outcomes Blanken, J., J. von Braun, and H. de Haen. 1994."The Triple Role CARE. 1995."A Study on Evaluation of Homestead Gardening of Potatoes as a Source of Cash, Food, and Employment: Program in Bajura and Mahottari Districts." Katmandu, Effects on Nutritional lmproveme~it in Rwanda." In Nepal. Agric~rlt~rrnlConnnercinlizntiorz, Eco~lo~lricDevrlop~rrozt,orld CarrascoSanez,N. C., R. M. D. deUbillas, I.S.Guillen, and S.M. Nrrtrition,ed. J. von Brnun rind E. Kennedy, 27694. Baltimore, Ferreira. 1998. "Increasing Women's Involvement in MD: JohnsHopkills University Press. Community Decision-Making: A Means to Improve Iron Block, S. 2003. "Nutrition Knowledge, Household Coping, and Status." Research Report No. 1. ICRW/OMNI (International the Demand for Micronutrient Rich Foods." Nutrition Center for Research on Women/Opportunities for Working Paper 5, BAPPENAS/Department Pertanian/ Micronutrient Interventions), Washington, DC. USAID/DAI Food Policy Advisory team. Chakravarty, 1.2000. "Food-Based Strategies toContro1Vitamin Boselie, D., S. Hensou and D. Weatherspoon. 2003. "Super- A Deficiency." Food ntzd Nrrtritiotr Brrlletir~21 (2): 13543. market Procurement Practices in Developing Countries: Chen, K. Z., A. W. Shepherd, and C. da Silva. 2005. Clrnrrscs irz Redefining the Roles of the Public and Private Sectors." Food Rrtnilitls in Asin: Fruit nrrd Vlyrtnblr SlrppIy Chnirr American 1olrrrlnlofAgric~rltrrrnlEcorlor~lics85 (5): 115541. Drve/oprlrrrits n~rdI~rrplicntior~sfor Fnrrlrrrs nrld Trnditiotrnl Bouis, H. 1997. "The Determi~~antsof Demand for Micro- Mnrketir~ySystc~llts.Rome: Food and Agriculture Organi- nutrients: An A~ialysisof Rural Households in Bangladesh." zation of the United Nations. FCND (Food Consumption and Nutrition Division of IFPRI) Chengappa, P. G., L. Achoth, A. Mukhejee, 6. M. Reddy, and Discussion Paper No. 32. IFPRl (International Food Policy P. C. Ravi. Forthcoming. Et~ol~rtio~tofFood Rrlnil Cluins ill Research Institute), Washington, DC. Indin. Washington, DC: Intemational Food Policy Research Bouis, H. 1999."Economics of Enhanced Micronutrient Density Institute. in Food Staples." Field Crops Resenrclr 60 (1-2) 165-173. Chowdhury N., N. Farid, nnd D. Roy. 2006. "Food Policy Bouis, H. 2000b. "Improving Nutrition through Agriculture: Liberalization in Bangladesh: How the Governments and The Role of International Agricultural Reserach." Food ntrd the Markets Delivered?" MTlD (Markets, Trade, and Nlrtrition Bullrtir~21 (4)550-566. Institutions Division of IFPRI) Discussion Paper No. 92. Bouis, H. 2002a. "Threecriteria for Establishing the Usefulness IFPRJ (International Food Policy Research Institute), of Biotechnology for Reducing Micro~~utrie~itMalnutrition." Washington, DC. Food nnd Nrrtritiolr Blrlletirl 23 (4)351-53. Chowdhury, S., A. Gulati, and E. Gumbira-Sa'id. 2005. "High Bouis, H. 2002b. "Plant Breeding: A New Tool for Fighting Value Products, Supermarketsand Vertical Arrangements in Micronutrient Malnutrition." [orrrrml of Nrrtritiorl 132: Indonesia." MTlD (Markets,Trade, and Institutions Division 4915-94s. of IFPRI) Discussion Paper No. 83. lFPR1(Interuatio~~alFood Bouis, H., and J. Hunt. 1999. "Linking Food and Nutrition Policy Research Institute), Washington, DC. Security: Past Lessons and Future Opportunities." Asin11 Christensen, C., and L. Witucki. 1982. "Food Problems and De71~~lop111e11tRezlintl 17:168-213. Emerging Policy Responses in Sub-Saharan Africa." Bouis, H., B. de la Briere, L. Guitierrez, K. Hallman, N. Hassan, AfrrrricnrlIo~rrr~nlof Agricrrltrrrnl Ecorroti~ics64 (5)889-896. 0 . Hels, W. Quabili, A. Quisumbing, S. Thilsted, 2. Zihad, de Pee, S.,M. W. Bloem, R. Satoto, A. Yip, R. Sukaton, R. Tjiong, and S. Zohir. 1998. Corttrtrrrcinl Vrgrtnblr nnd Polyc~rlt~~re R. Shrimpton, D. Muhilal, and B. Kodyat. 1998. "lmpact of a Fish Prodlrctior~ it1 Bnnglndeslt: Tlrrir Irrrpncts orr Ir~co~rrr, Social Marketing Campaign Promoting Dark-Green Leafy Ho~rselroldReso~rrceAllocntiorl,nrld Nrrtritiorl.Washington, DC: Vegetables and Eggs in Central Java, Indonesia." Irztenlntiorml International Food Policy Research Institute. lour~inlofvitnnrirt A Nutrition Resenrcl~68: 389-398. Brouwers, T. 2006. "India: Dairy Giant Walking Barefoot." de I'ee, S.,C. E. West, D. Muhilal, D. Karyadi, and J. G. Hautvast. Z~rir~elZiclttSpecial India, February 2006. Uitgeverij, 1995. "Lack of Improvement in Vitamin A Status with Netherlaiids. Increased Consumption of Dark-Green Leafy Vegetables." Brugere, C., K. McAndrew, and P. Bulcock. 2001. "Does Cage Lnncrt 346: 7581. Aquaculture Address Gender Goals in Development? DeGrassi, A. 2003. Ge~~eticnllyModified Crops nrtd Sl~stninnblr Results of a Case Study in Bangladesh." Aquaculture Poverty Alleointio~rill Srtb-Snlmrnr~Africn: AII Assrsslrrerit of Economics and Management 5 (M): 179-89. Clrrrerzt Er~idrrlcr.Accra, Ghana: Third World Network- Bruinsma, J.2003. World Axrir~rltrrr~.:Tormrds2015/'2030:AIIFA0 Africa. Prrspcti7~e.London: ~arthscan. Delgado, C. L. 1995. "Africa's Changing Agricultural Brun, T. A,, C. Geissler, and E. Kennedy. 1991. "The lmpact of Development Strategies: Past and Present Paradigms as a Agricultural Projects on Food, Nutrition and Health." World Guide to the Future." IFPRI Food, Agriculture, and the Rrvinu ofNntritiort nlld Dietrtirs 65: 99-123. Environment Discussion Paper 3. IFPRI (International Food Brun, T.,J.Reynaud, and S.Chevassus-Agnes. 1989."Food and Policy Research Institute), Washington, DC. Nutrition lmpact of One Homestead Garden Project in Delgado, C. L.,N. Minot, and M. Tiongco. 2005. "Evidence and Senegal." Ecolos-yofFood n ~ N~rtritiorr23: 91. ~ d Implications of Non-Tradability of Food Staples in Tanzania Brun, T. A., C. Geissler, and E. Kennedy. 1991. The Impact of 1983-1998." ]orrrt~nlof Drrlelop~~ie~rtStr~dics41 (3):37693. Agricultural Projects on Food, Nutrition and Health. World Delgado, C., M. Rosegrant, H. Steinfeld, S. Ehui, and C. Rrvinu ofNlrtritior1 a11dDiet~tics65: 99-123. Courbois. 1999. Livestock to 2020: Ule Next Food Rezlolrrtiorr. Bus11amuka.V. N., S. de Pee, A. Talukder, L. Kiess, D. Washington, DC: IFPRI (International Food Policy Research Panagides, A. Taller, and M. Bloem. 2005. "lmpact of a Institute), and Rome: United Nations Food and Agricultural Homestead Gardening Program on Household Food Organization. Security and Empowerment of Women in Bangladesh." Food Deshingkar, P., C. Joh~lson,and J. Farrington. 2003. "State nr~dNrrlritio~~Brrllctitz 26 (1): 17-25. Transfersto the Poor and Back: The Case of Food for Work ill Calvin, L.2003."Produce, Food Safety, and International Tradc: India." World Develol~nretrt.33 (4)575-591. Response to U.S. Foodborne Illness Outbreaks Associated Dessie, T., and B. Ogle. 2001. "Village Poultry Production with Imported Produce." In Ir~terr~ntiot~nlTrnde ntld Food Systems in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia." Tropical Snfity: Ecorlortric Tlreoy nrzd Cnsr St~rdi~s,ed. J. Buzby. USDA, Animal Health and IJroduction33 (6):521-37. Econ. Res. Serv.,AER-828. Bibliography 77 DeWalt, K. 1993. "Nutrition and the Commercialization of Increase the Serum Retinol Concentrations of 2-5-Year-Old Agriculture: Ten Years Later." Socinl Scierlcrrind Medicine 36: Children in South Africa." Arrreri~nr~/o~rrrrnl of Clinicol 1407-16. Nrrtrifiorl 76: 1048-54. DeWalt, K., B. DeWalt, J. Escudero, and D. Barkin. 1990. "Shitts Faiguenbaum, S.,J. Berdegue, and T. Reardon. 2002. "The Rapid from Maize to Sorghum Production: Nutrition Effects in Four Rise of Supermarkets in Chile: Effects on Dairy, Vegetable, Mexican Communities." Food Policy 15: 395-407. and Beef Chair~s."DeocloyinerrtPolicy Rerietu 20 (4): 459-71. Dewey, K .G. 1981. "Nutritional Consequences ot the F A 0 (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Transformation from Subsistence to ~ommeicialAgriculture Nations).2005. FAOStnt. Rome, Italy, FAO. in Tabasco, Mexico." Hurimr~Ecology 9 (2): 151-87. -. 1996. Rortre Declnrntiot~on World Food Secrrrity. World Dey, J. 1981. "Gambian Women: Unequal Partners in Rice Food Summit 13-17 Novemher 1996:A Manual. Rome, Italy: Development Projects." /orrrnal ofDeaelo}~rlrrrltStrrdies 17(3). FAO. Diao, X., J. liattso, and H.E. Stokke. 2005 "International -. 1982. 111tc~grntinyN~rtritior~into Agric~rlhrrnlond Rum1 Spillovers, I'roductivity Growth and Openness in Thailand: Der~eloprirer~tProjects:A Mnrtrral. FAO, Rome, Italy. An Intertemporal General Equilibrium Analysis." /orrr~rolof -. 2003. "The Role of Aquaculture in Improving Food Der~eloprrrerrtEcor~orrrics76 (2). Security and Nutrition." Report to Committee 011 World Digal, L. N., and S. B. Conception. 2004. "Securing Small Food Security, 29th Sessio~i,May 12-16,2003. FAO, Rome, Producer Participation in Restructured National and Italy. Regional Agri-Food Systems-The Case of Philippines." -. 2004. Tire Stnte of Agricr~lt~rrnlComrnodrty Mnrkets 2004. http://rego\~erni~~gmarkets.org/docs/Philippines-Report'%~ FAO, Rome, Italy. 20-6No\.2004.pdf. -. 2006. Tl~rStnfeofFood Ir~scc~~rifyin t11eWorld 2006. FAO, Dong, F., and H. Jensen.2004. "The Challenge of Conforming to Kome, Italy. Sanitary and Phytosa~~itaryMeasures for China's -. 2006a. Tile Stntr of tire World Fisheries nrrd Aq~rncrrlt~rre. Agricultural Exports." MATRIC Worki~igPaper 04MWP-8. FAO, Rome, Italy. Midwest Agribusiness Trade Research and Information Farina, E. M. M. Q. 2002. "Consolidation, Multinatiol~alisation, Center, Iowa State University, Ames, IA. and Competition in Brazil: Impacts on Horticulture and Do~igier,P., J. van Domelen, E. Ostrom, A. Ryan, W. Wakeman, Dairy Products Systems." Der~eloyri~erztPolic!y Revietu 20 (4): A. Debbington, S. Alkire, T. Esmail, and M. Polski. 2003. 44157. "Community Driven Development." In A Sorrrcebook for Fleuret, I'., and A. Fleuret. 1980. "Nutrition, Consumption, and Povert!y Redrlc.tiort Strnteyies, ed. J. Klugma~l, 303-32. Agricultural Change." Hlrmor~Orgor~izntior~39: 25040. Washington, DC: World Bank. Gala1,O. M.,G. G. Harrisoti, A. I. Abdou, and A. Zein el Abedin. Dorjee, T., CV. Roder, and L. Tsliering. 2002. "Genetic Diversity 1987. "The Impact of a Small-Scale Agricultural Intervention of Bhutanese Yak (Bos Gru~iniens)Using Microsatellite on Socio-Economic and Health Status." Food Nutrition 13(1): Markers." I'roceedirrys of tlre Tlrird Irrt~rr~ntiorinlCo~~yresson 3543. Ynk, Lhasa, China, September 4-9,2000, pp. 197-201. Nairobi, Gale. F., and B. Gilmour. 2002. "A Mature Retail Sector: Wider Kenya: ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute). Clia~inelsfor Food Imports?" In Clrirrr~'~Food or~dAgricrlltrrre: English, R., and J. Badcock. 1998. "A Community Nutrition Issrresfor tlre 21st Centrrry, ed. F. Gale, F. Tuan, B. Lohmar, Project in Viet Nam: Effects on Child Morbidity." Fooif, Hsi~i-HuiHsu, and B. Gilmour. Agriculture Informati011 Nrrtritiorr nrrd Ag-ricrrltrrre22: 15-21. Bulletin No. 775. Washington, DC: Economic Research English, R. M., J. Badcock, T. Giay, T. Ngu, A. M. Waters, and S. Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. A. Be~i~iett.1997. "Effect of Nutrition Improvement Project Getilhar, M.,and A. Regmi. 2005. "FactorsShapingGlobal Food on Morbidity from Infectio~lsDiseases in Preschool Children Markets." In Nnrl Directiorrs irz Glob01 Food Markets, ed. A. in Vietnam: Comparison with Control Commune." Britislr Regmi and M. Gehlhar. Agriculture Information Bulletin No. M~tliiol/orrrrml315 (7116):1122-25. 794. Wasliington, DC: Economic Research Scrvicc, U.S. Evenson, I<.E., and D. Gollin. 2003. "The Green Revolution: An Department of Agriculture. End of Century Perspective." Scierrce 300 (5620) (May 2): Gliezan, G., M. Mateos, and L. Viteri. 2002. "Impacts ot 75842. Supermarkets and Fast-Food Chains on Horticulture Supply Evenson, R. E., and D. Gollin. 2003a. "Assessing the Impact of Chains in Argentina." Deuelopnrerrt Poliry Rer~ieru20 (4): the Green Iievolution: 1960to 2000." Screrrce300: 75842. 389408. Evenson, R. E., and D. Gollin. 2003b. Crop Vnriety Irtr~~ror~errrer~t Gibson, R. S. 1994. "Content and Bioavailability of Trace nrrd Its E//eect 011 Prod~rctivity: Tire Irirpnct of Iriterrrntior~nl Elements in Vegetarian Diets." Anrericnr~/orrrnal of Clinicnl Agricrrlhrral Rt~senrclr.Wallingford, U.K.: CAB International. N~rtrition59 (5Suppl): 12235-32s. Excerpt from invited comments during plenary session before Gillespie, S. 2001. "Strengthening Capacity to Improve break-out groups by Milla McLachlan. 2000. World Bank. Nutrition." Food Consumption and Nutrition Division Fondnrrd Nrrtrrtio~rBtilletir~21 (4):56041. Discussio~iPaper 106. IFPRI (Inter~iationalFood Policy Faber, M., and A. J. S. Benade. 2003. "Integrated Home- Research Institute), Washington, DC. Gardening and Community-Based Growth Monitoring Gillespie, S., and J. Mason. 1994. "Controlling Vitamin A Activities to Alleviate Vitamin A Deficiency in a Rural Deficiency." ACC/SCN State-of-the-Arts series. Nutrition Village in So~ltliAfrica." Food, Nrrtritiorz and Ayric~rlttrre32: Policy Discussion Paper No. 14. United Nations 24-32. Administrative Committee on Coordination-Subcommittee Faber, M., A.B. Spinnler, and S.L. Venter. 2002a. "Increased o ~Nutrition, Geneva, Switzerland. i Vitamin A Intake in Children Aged 2-5 Years through Gittelsohn, J., and A. E. Vastine. 2003. "Sociocultural and Targeted Home-Gardens in a Rural South African Household Factors Impacting on the Selection, Allocation Community." P~rblicHenltl~Nrrtritiorr 5 (1): 11-16. and Consumption of Animal Source Foods: Current Faber, M., M.A.S. Phu~fula, S. Venter, M.A. Dliansay, A.J. Knowledge and Application." /orrrrrnl of N~rtrition133 (11 Spinnler. 2002b. "Homestead Gardens Focusiug on the Suppl2):4036541s. Production o f Yellow and Dark-Green Leafy Vegetables 78 From Agriculture to Nutrition: Pathways,Synergies,and Outcomes Goletti, F. 1999. "Agricultural Diversification and Rural Hawkes, C. 2007a. "Agricultural and Food Policy for Industrializatio~ias a Strategy for Rural Illcome Growth mid Cardiovascular Health in Latin America. Preve~itio~iand Poverty Reduction in Indochina and Myanmar." Markets Control." Jorrrnal ofthe World Henrt Federntior1 2: 137-47. and Structural Studies Division Discussion Paper No. 30. Hawkes, C. 2007b. "Promoting Healthy Diets and Tackling IFPRl (International Food Policy Research Institute), Obesity and Diet-Related Chronic Diseases: What are the Washington, DC. Agricultural Policy Levers?" Food and Nirtrition Birlletin 28: Graham, R., R. Welch, D. Saunders, I. Ortiz-Monasterio, H. S312-22. Bouis, M. Bonierbale, S. de Haan, G. Burgos, G. Thiele, R. Hawkes, C., and M. Ruel. 2006a. Understnrrding the Lirrk between Liria,C. Meiwer, S. Beebe, M. Potts, M. Kadian, P. Hobbs, R. Agricirltrrrearld Health. Washington, DC: IFPRI(International Gupta, and S. Twomlow. 2007."Nutritious SubsisteliceFood Food Policy Research Institute). Systems." Adunrrces in Agronowry 92: 1-74. Hawkes, C., and M. Ruel. 2006b. "Agriculture and Nutrition Greiner, T., and S. N. Mitra. 1995."Evaluation of the Impact of Linkages: Old Lessons and New Paradigms." In a Food-Based Approach to Solvi~igVitamin A Deficiency in Urrderstnrrding tlze Lirrks betrueen Agricrrlttrre and Healtlr, ed. C. Bangladesh." Food arrd Nutritiort B~rlletin16(3):193-205. Hawkes and M. Ruel. Number 4. Washington, DC: IFPRI Gueye, E. H. 2000. "Women and Family Poultry Production in (InternationalFood Policy Research Institute). Rural Africa." Derielopw~entirz Prnctice 10(1):98102. Hawkes, C., M. Ruel, and S.Babu, eds.2007. "Linkages between Habtemariam, K., W. Ayalew, G. Z. Habte, and M. T. Gebre. Agriculture and Health in Science,Policy, and Practice." Food 2003. "Enhancing the Role of Livestock Production in nrtd Nrrtritior~Brdletin 20 (2)(SuppIement). Improvilig Nutritional Status of Farming Families: Lesso~~s Hazell, P. B. R. 1987.Changing Pattern of Variability in Cereal from a Dairy Goat DeveIopment Project in Easteni Ethiopia." Prices and Production. In Ag:ricirlttrrnl Price Policy for Livestock Reswrcltfor Rrrral Deueloprr~ertt15(6). Deuelopittg Colrntries, ed. J.W. Mellor and R. Ahmed, 27-52. Haddad, L, H. Alderman, S. Appleton, L. Song, Y. Yohannes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. 2003."Reducing Malnutrition: How Far does Income Growth Heaver, R. 2005. Strengtlrerting Coirrrtry Corlrrr~itmerttto Hrrt~rarz Take Us?" World Bartk Ecorzowric Rcvi~ru17(1). Deueloprr~ertt-Lessonsfro~~tNutritiott. Washington, DC:World Haddad, L. and J. Hoddinott. 1994."Women's Income and Boy- Bank. Girl Anthropometric Status in Cote d'lvoire." World Henson, S. 2003. "The Eco~lomicsof Food Safety in Developing Deuelopmerrt 22 (4). Countries." ESA Working Paper No. 03-19. FAO, Rome, Italy. Haddad, L., S. Bhattarai, M. Immink, S. Kuman, and A. Slack. HKI (Helen Keller International). 2006. "Homestead Food 1995. "More Than Food Is Needed to Achieve Good Production for Improving Micronutrient Status of Women Nutrition by 2020." 2020Vision Brief 25. IFPRl (Inteniational and Children, Poverty Reduction and Promotion of Gender Food Policy and Research Institute), Washington, DC. Equality." Submitted to Novib. HKI, NY. Haddad, L., J. Hoddinott, and H. Alderman, eds. 1997. -. 2004. "Homestead Food Production Program in Central Intraltorrselzold Resoirrce Allocation irt Developing: Cotrrrtries: and Far-Western Nepal Increases Food and Nutrition Models, Metlrods, arzd Policy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkills Security." Ntrtrition Birlletilt 2 (1). U~iiversityPress. -. 2004a. "Improving Household Food Security in Haddad, L., and L. C. Smith. 1999. "Explaining Child Cambodia through Integration of Poultry Production into Malnutrition in Developing Countries: A Cross-Country Existing Home Gardening Programs." Carrlbodin Nritrition Analysis." Discussio~lPaper 60. IFPRI (International Food Brrlletin 4 (1). Policy and Research Institute), Washington, DC. -. 2003. Integriltion of Ar~br[ol Hrrsbnndry into Home Hagenimana, V., M. Anyango Oyunga, J. Low, S. M. Nojoroge, Gardening Progrowls to lr~crenseVitolnirl A 1ntokPfroni Foods: S. T. Gichuki, and J. Kabira. 1999. "Testing the Effects of Bangladeslz, Combodin, nrrd Nepal. Asia Pacific Special Issue. Women Farmers' Adoption and Production of Orange- HKI/AVRDC (Helen Keller InternationaI/Asian Vegetable Fleshed Sweet Potatoes on Dietary Vitamin A Intake in Research and Develoome~lt Center) (Taiwan). 1993. Kenya." Research Report No. 3. ICRW (Inten~ationalCenter Hotnestend Gerderiing in bnngindes~t:~valrrntiori~ e p a r toftlte for Research on Women), Washington, DC; OMNI Honiestead Gnrdenil~aPilot Proiect. NY:HKI. " (Opportunities for Micro~lutrie~itInterventions). HKI (HeIen Keller Inter~~ational)/Asia-Pacific. 2001. Homestmd Hagenimana, V.,]. Low, M. Anyango, K. Kurz, S. T. Gichuki, Food Prodrrctron-A Strntegy to Cornbnt Mnlrttltrition nnd and 1. Kabira. 2001. "Enhancing Vitamin A Intake in You~lg Poverty. Jakarta, Indonesid: HKI. Children in Western Kenya: Orange-Fleshed Sweet Potatoes HKI (Helen Keller Intemational)/Cambodia. 2003.Har~dbookfor and Women Farmers Can Serve as Key Entry Points." Food Honiestend Gardening rlt Calnbodin: Tlre Coiitplete Mnnirnlfor ond Nirtrition Birlletin 22: 37G87. Vegetable and Frrrrt Prodilction. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Hastings, G., M. Stead, L. McDermott, A. Forsyth, A. M. Helen Keller Worldwide. MacKintosh, M. Rayner, C. Godfrey, M. Caraher, and K. Hoddinott, J., and L. Haddad. 1994.Women's Income and Boy- Angus. 2003. Does Food Promotion Irrfluerrrc Clrildren? A Girl Anthropometric Status in the Cbte d'lvoire. World Systerrrntic Reuipru of tlie Erridence. London: Food Standards Deuelop~~retit22 (4): 543-53. http://www.actahort.org/ Agency. books/712/712-100.htm. Hawkes, C. 2002. "Marketing Activities of Global Soft Drink Hu, D., T. Reardon, S. Rozelle, P. Timmer, and H. Wang. 2004. and Fast Food Cornpallies in Emerging Markets: A Review." "The Emergence of Supermarkets with Chinese In Globnlizotiort, Diets nrrd Norr-contnrtirricnble Diseases. Geneva, Characteristics: Challenges and Opportunities for China's Switzerland:World Health Organization. Agricultural Development." Developmettt Policy Reureru 22 (4) Hawkes, C. 2006. "Uneven Dietary Development: Linking the (September): 557-86. Policies and Processes of Globalization with the Nutrition Humphrey, J. 2005. "Shaping Value Chains for Development: Transition, Obesity and Diet-Related Chronic Diseases." Global Value Chains in Agribusiness." Study commissioned Globnlizntion nnd Henltlr 2: 4. http://www.globalizationa~~d- by the Federal Ministry of Eco~iomicCooperation and health.~om/content/2/1/. Development, Germany. Bibliography 79 Hussein, K. 2002. Liuelilroods Appronclres Cornpnred: A Multr- Kerr, ll.B., and M. Chirwa. 2004. "Participatory Research Agetlcy Reviero of C~rrrer~tPrnctice. London: Overseas Approaches and Social Dynamics That Influence Agricul- Development Institute. tural Practices to Improve Child Nutrition in Malawi." IFAD (International Fund for Agricultural Development.)2004. EcoHenltl~1: 109-119. Lirrestock Servicesnrzd t11ePoor: A Globnl Initintive: Collecting, Kidala, D, T. Greiner, and M. Gebre-Medhin. 2000. "Five-Year Coordirrntinxnnd Slmrirrg Experierlces. Rome, Italy: IFAD. Follow-up of a Food-Based Vitamin A Intervention in IFPRI (Inteniatio~ial Food Policy Research Institute), Tanzania." Plrblic Henlth Nlrtrition 3 (4):425-31. Bangladesh Institute of Developrne~itStudies, Institute of Kiess, L., M.W.Bloem, S. de Pee, A. Hye, T. Khan, A. Talukder, Nutrition and Science, Data Analysis and Technical N. Huq, M. Haq, and M. Ali. 1998. "Bangladesh: Assistance and Research Department of Human Nutrition, XerophthaImia Free. The Result of an Effective Vitamin A Royal Veterinary Agricultural University. 1998.Comnrercinl Capsule Program and Homestead Gardening." I11 Americnn Vrgrtnble nrrd PolyrrrltrrreFish Prodrrction irr Borrglndeslr: Tlrrir Plrblir Henltlr Associntiotl 126th Annlrnl Meeting Report, 361. Impnctson Irzcortre,HolrseholdResolrrceAllocntiorz,nrrd Nlrtritiorr, Washington, D.C: American Public Health Association. Vol. 1.Washington, DC: IFPRI. Kiess, L. R.Moeiich-Pfanner, and M.W. Bloem. 2001. "Food- ILSI. (InternationaI Life Scie~icesInstitute.) 2002. "Third-World Based Strategies: Can They Play a Role in lnter~iatio~ial Nutrition Programs: Closer Collaboratio~i between Development?" Food Nrrtrition Brrlleti~r22: 43-2. Agriculture and Nutrition Scientists." ILSI News 20 (1):1-8. Krueger, A,, M. W. Schiff,and A. Valdes, eds. 1991.Tl~ePoliticnl James,W. P. T., R. Jackson-Leach,C. M. Ni, E.Kalamara, and M. Econonty of Agricrrlt~rrnlPricing Policy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Shayeglri. 2004. "Overweight and Obesity (high body mass Hopkins University Press. index)." In Comporntizle Q~rnntificntionof Henltll Risks: GIobnl Kuipers, P. 2005. "South Africa's Two-Tiered Retail Sector." nrid Rexiorznl Brrrdert of Dismse Attribrrtnblr to Selec-tedMnjor Elser~ierFood Interrrntiorrnl8 (1)(February). Risk Fnctors, ed. M. Ezzati, A. Lopez, A. Rodgers, and C. J. L. Kumar, S., and C. Siandwazi. 1994. "Maize in Zambia: Effects Murray, 959-1108. World Health Organization, Geneva, of Technological Cha~lgeon Food Consumption and Switzerland. Nutrition." In Agric~rlt~lrnlCornmercinlizntior~,Economic Jha, S., and P. V. Srinivasan.2004. "Achieving Food Security in Dmiclo~~rnrrzt,nnd Nlrtrition, ed. J.vo~iBraun and E. Kennedy, a Cost-Effective Way." MTID Discussio~lPaper 67. IFPRI, 295-308. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Washington, DC. Kurz, K., and C. Johnson-Welch. 2007. "Enhancing Women's Johns, T., and B. R. Sthapit. 2004. "BioculturaI Diversity in the Contributions to lmprovi~igFamily Food Co~isumptio~iand Sustainability of Developing Country Food Systems." Food Nutrition." Food nrld N~~fritiol~Bt~lletin22: 44553. nrrd Nutritiorr Brrllrtirt 25: 14555. Lawrence, M., W. A. Coward, F. Lawrence, T. J. Cole, and R. G. Johns,T., I. Smith, and P. Eyzaguirre.2006. "Understallding the Whitehead. 1987. "Fat Gain During Preg~iatlcyin Rural Links between Agriculture, Nutrition, and Health: African Women: The Effect of Season and Dietary Status." Agrobiodiversity, Nutrition, and Health." Focus Brief #13. Artrericnrr Jorrrrmlof ClirricnlN~rtrition45: 1442-50. IFPRI, Washington, DC. Leroy, J. L., and E. Frongillo. Forthcoming, "Call Interventions Johnson-Welch, C. 2002. Lirlkir~yAgric~rlt~rrearrd Nlrtritior~:Tllc to Promote Animal Production Ameliorate Undemutrition?" Hlrrrmr~Dirilcrzsior~.Washington, DC: International Center for lolrrrtnlqfNrrtritiorr. Research on Women. Leroy,J.L.,C. F. Nicholson, M. W. Demment,T. F. Randolph, A. Johnson-Welch, C., K. MacQuarrie, and S. Bunch. 2005. A M. I'omeroy, and E. A. Frongillo. 2007. "Can Livestock Lcnderslrip Strntc.y!j for Redrrciriy Hr~rrgernrid Mnlrr~rtritroi~irr Production Ameliorate Undemutrition?" February 2007draft. Africn: TlreAgricrrltrrre-NrrtritiorlAdr~orltngc.Washington,D.C: Levinson, J. 1995. "Multisectoral Nutrition Planning: A International Center for Research on Women. Synthesis of Experience." In Clrild Grozritll nrld Nlrtrition irl Kapinga, R., A. Anderson, C. Crissma~~,D. Zhang, B. Lemaga, Devrlopirlg Corrntrirs-Priorities for Actiorr, ed. P. I'instrup- and F. Opio. 2005."Vitamin A Partnership for Africa: A Food Andcrsen, D. Pelletier, and H. Alderman, 262-82. Ithaca, Based Approach to Combat Vitamin A Deficiency in Sub- N.Y.:Cornell University Press. Saharan Africa through Increased Utilization of Orange- Levinson, J. 2000. Scnrclririgfor n Horrre: Tlre Irtstitrrtiorlnlizotio~r Fleshed Sweetpotato." Chror~icnHortic1rltrrrnc45:12-14. Issrrc iffIr~terrmtiormlNrrtritiori. Washington, DC: World Bank. Kataki, P. K., and S. C. Babu. 202. Food S!/ste~risfor Irrryror~e~f Low, J., M. Arimond, N. Osman, A. K. Osei, F. Zano, B. H~lrrrnrr Nrrtritiorr: Lir~kirrg Agric~rltrrre, Nrrtritiorr nrld Cunguara, M. Selemane, D. Abdullah, and D. Tschirley.2005. Prod~rc-tiriity.Bi~ighamton,NY: Haworth Press, Inc. Tonlnrds S~rstnir~nblrNlrtritiorl Irilprove~nort ill Rlrrnl Katz, E. 1994."The Impact of Non-traditional Export Agriculture Momrirbiqrle:Addressirlg Mncro- orrd Micro-N~rtrieritMnl~rlrtri- on Income and Food Availability in Guatemala: An ti011tlrrough Neru Clrltiz~nrsnrid Nezc~Bel~nr~iors:Key Firrdirr~s. Intrahousehold Perspective." Footf nrrd Nrrtritior~B~rlletirr15(4). East Laiising, MI. State University Press. Kennedy, E. 1994. "Approaches to Linking Agriculture and Low, I., M. Arimond, N. Osman, B. Cunguara, F. Zano, and D. Nutrition Programmes." Hrnltll Polic!j or~dPlnr~~rirr~9 (3): Tschirley. 2007a. "A Food-Based Approach lntro~luci~ig 294-305. Orange-Fleshed Sweet Potatoes Increased Vitamin A Intake Kenliedy, E., and H. E. Bouis. 1993. "Linkages betweell and SerumRetinol Co~icentratio~isamong Yo~uigChildren in Agriculture and Nutrition. Implications for Policy and Rural Mozambique." \orrrrlnl ofNlrtritioit 137. Research." Occasional Paper 28. IFPRI, Washington, DC. Low, J., M. Arimond, N. Osman, B. Cunguara, F. Zano, and D. Kennedy, E., H. Bouis, and J. von Braun. 1992. "Health and Tschirley. 2007%. "Ensuring Supply and Creating Demand Nutrition Effects of Cash-Crop Production in Developing for a Biofortified Crop with a Visible Trait: Lesso~isLearned Countries: A Comparative Analysis." Social Science and from the Introduction of Orange-Fleshed Sweet Potato in Medicine 35:689497. Drought-Prone Areas of Mozambique." Food nrrd Nrrtritiorr Kerr, R.B.2006. Co~ltcstrdKrrorrlledyrnrrd Disy~rtedPrncticr: Mnrze Brrlletirr. Forthcoming. nrrcl Grorrrrdrrrrt Seeds o~rdClrilcl Feedinig ill Nortlrerr~Mc~lnit~i. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. 80 From Agriculture to Nutrition:Pathways, Synergies,and Outcomes Lumpkin, T. A., K. Weinberger, and S. Moore. 2005. "Increasing High Value Fruit and Vegetable Supply Cliains." CAPRI Income through Fruit and Vegetable Production: Opportu- Working Paper. IFPRI, Washington, DC. nities and Challenges." Draft note, CGIAR Scie~iceForum, 6 Naylor, R., W. Falcon, R. Goodman, M. Jahn, T. Sengooba, H. December 2005, Marrakech, Morocco. Tefera, and R. Nelson. 2004. "Biotechnology in the Lynch, L. 1979. "Nutrition-Plan11i11g Methodologies: A Developi~~gWorld: A Case For l~~creasedInvestments in Comparative Review of Types and Applicatiotis." Food nrrd Orphan Crops." Food Policy 29: 1544. N~rtritionB~rlletin1(3): 1-14. Nestel, P, H. E. Bouis, J. V. Meenakshi and W. Pfeiffer. 2006. Maheshwar, C.,and T.S. Cha~iakwa.2006. "Post Harvest Losses "Biofortification of Staple Food Crops." ]orrrrlnl oJNr~tritiorr Due toGaps in Cold Chains in India-A Solution." Actn Hort 136(April): 106447. (ISHS)712: 777-84. Neven, D.,T. Reardon, and H. Wang. 2006. "Supermarkets and Mason, J. B. 2000. How Nutrition Improves and What That Consumers in Africa: The Case of Nairobi, Kenya." ]o~rrrlnloj Implies for Policy Decisions. Washington, DC: World Bank. Irtterr~ntio~~nlFood nrzd Agrib~rsirtessMnrketirzg 18(1/2). Maxwell, S., and T. Conway. 2000. "New Approaches to Ngu, T., N. D. Quang, P. H. Ha, T. Giay, J. C. Badcock, and S. Pla~ining." Operatio~~sEvaluation Department Working Fitzgerald. 1995. "A Food-Based Approach to Nutrition Paper Series No. 14. World Bank, Washington, DC. Improvement through Housellold Food Security in Vietnam, McClaren, D. S. 1974. "The Great Protein Fiasco." Lnrlcet Jul 13 with Special Reference to Vitamin A Deficiency." In (2):934. Proceedrrtgs of 16th IVACG Mectirlg, Chnr~gRni, Tl~nilor~d, 1994. Meinzen-Dick, R., and M. Adato.2007. "Impacts of Agricultural Washington, DC: Intertiational Life Sciences Institute (p.77). Research on Poverty: Synthesis of Findings and Implications Niamir-Fuller, M. 1994. Wornerr Livestock Mnifnyrrs ill tlrc Tllird for Future Directions." In Ayricrrlt~rrnlResenrch, L~rielil~oods, World: A Focrls or1 Teclriricnl lsslres Relntcd to Gender Roles ir~ nrfd Por1erty. Shldies oJ Ecortorr~icnr~dSocinl Irripncts irr SIX Lir~estorkProdrrctio~r.Rome, Italy: International Fund for Colrntries, ed. M. Adato and R. Meinzen-Dick, 331-67. Agricultural Development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkills University Press for IFPRI. Nielsen, H. 1996."The Socio-Economic Impact of a Smallholder Meinzen-Dick, R., M. Adato, L. Haddad, and P. Hazel]. 2004. Livestock Development Project, Bangladesh, Integrated "Science and Poverty: An I~~terdisciplinaryAssessment of Farming in Human Development" (workshop); Danish the Impact of Agricultural Research." Food Policy Report. Agricultural and Rural Development Advisers Forum, Tune IFI'RI, Washington, DC. Landboskole, Denmark. Mendez, M. A., and B. M. Popkin. 2004. "Globalization, Urbani- Nielsen, H., N. Roos, and S. H. Thilsted. 2003. "The Impact of zation and Nutritional Change in the Developing World." Semi-scavenging Poultry Prodi~ctionon the Consumption of FA0 Food nrtd Nrrtritiorl Pnpcr 1(2)55-80. Animal Source Foods by Women and Girls in Bangladesh." Minot, N., and D. Roy. 2006. "Impact of High Value Agriculture Io~rrrlnlof Nlrtritiorl 133(11Suppl2): 4027S-30s. and Modem Marketing Cha~unelson Poverty: A Conceptual Niemeijer, R., and J. Hoorweg. 1994. "Commercialization of Framework." IFPRI, Washington, DC (Photocopy). Rice and Nutrition: ACase from West Kenya." In Ayric~rlhrrnl Mirle, C. 2006. Predicting tlre Effects of Crop-Based Agrict~ltrrrnl Corrrr~rercinlizntio~r,Ecor~orr~icDcvelo~~r~rent,nrld Ntrtritiorf,ed. J. Progrnvzs011Hoiisc~l~old-Levc*lCottsrrrtrptio~rill RrrrnlBnr~glndeslr: von Braun and E. Kennedy, 264-275. Baltimore, MD: Johns T11e Cnse of t11e Nortl~r~iestCrop Diriers#cntior~ Proyrnrn iri Hopkins University Press. Aditnlnri Upnzillo, Norllrruest Bnrlylndcsl~.Bostnn, MA: Tufts Niemeijer, R., M. Guens, T. Kliest, V. Ogonda, and J. Hoorweg. University. 1988. "Nutrition in Agricultural Development: The Case of Mody, A., R. Suri, and J. Sanders. 1992. "Keeping Pace with Irrigated Ricecultivation in West Kenya." Ecology ofFoodnriri Change: Organizational and Tech~~ologicalImperatives." Nzitritior~22: 65-81. World Drrrdoprnnlt 20 (12): 1797-1816. Nugent, R. 2004. "Food and Agriculture Policy: Issues Related Monsen, E. R. 1988. Iron Nutrition and Absorption: Dietary to Prevention of Noncommu~~icableDiseases." Food Nlrtritiort Factors Which Impact Iron Bioavailability. ]o~~rirnloJAr~rericnrr B~rlletirt25 (2):200-7. Diet Associntion 88 (7):78690. Okello, J. 2003. "Compliance with International Food Safety Mullins, G., L. Wahome, P. Tsangari, and L. Maarse. 1996. Standards: The Case of Green Bean Production in Kenyan Impacts of Intensive Dairy Production on Smallholder Farm Family Farms." PhD dissertation, Michigan State University. Women in Coastal Kenya. Hlrrrinrt Ecology 24 (2):231-53. Pacey, A., and P. Payne. 1985. Agricrrltrirnl Do1el0)1nient nrld Mulokozi, G., L. MseIle, C. Mgoba, J.K. L. Mugyabuso, and D. Nrrtritioll. London: Hutchinson. G. Ndossi. 2000. Irr~proueriSolnrDrytrrgof Vilor~rirtA-Ricl~Foods Paeratakul, S.,B. M. Popkin, and K. Ge. 1998. "Clianges in Diet by Womerl's Grotqjs in tlleSirrgidn DrstrictofTnr~znr~in.Research and Physical Activity Affect the Body Mass Indcxof Chinese Program No. 5. Washington, DC: ICRW/OMNI (Interna- Adults." l~rterrtntiorrnl]orrrrlnl of Obesity Relnted Metnbolic tional Center for Research on Women/Opportunities for Disorders 22 (5): 424-31. Micronutrient Interventions). PAHO (Pan American Health Organization.) 1990. Primera Mwangwela, A. M. 2001. "Post Harvest Sector Challenges in Reunion de la red Latinoamericana de Vigilancia Malawi." Paper presented at the FAO-GFAR Global Epidemiologica d e las Enfermedades. VETA 11, PAHO, Initiative for Post Harvest Technology Meeting, Entebbe, Washington, DC. Uganda, September 17-19. Parlato,M., and P. Gottert. 1996."Promoting Vitamin A in Rural Nalim, S. 1994. "The lmpact of Fish in Enhancing Rice Field Niger: Strategies for Adverse Conditions." In Strntegiesfor Ecology and in Integrated Pest Management." Summary re- Proniotirtg Vitnlnirf A Prodlrctiorz, Corls~rrn}~tiorrnrrd S11pp1enrr11- port of the 3rd Asian Regional RICC-FishFarming Research tntiort. Folrr Cnse Stt~dies,ed. R. E. Seidel. Washington, DC: and Development Workshop, June 6-11, 1993, Sukamandi Academy for Educational Development. Research Institute for Food Crops, West lava, Indonesia. PATH Canada. 2004. "Soils, Food, and Healthy Communities: ICLARM CorlJero~ceProceedir~~s 43. A Participatory Agroecosystem Approach to Monitoring Narrod, C., D. Roy, K. Rich, J. Okello, 0.Avendano, and A. Change in Northern Malawi: Filial Technical Report." Thorat. 2006. "The Role of Public-Private Partnerships and Submitted to the International Developme~~tResearch Collective Action in Ensuring Smallholder Participation in Center, Canada. Peduzzi, C. 1990."Home and Community Gardens Assessment International Food Policy Research Institute/Baltimore, MD: Program Implementation Experience: The Tip of the Iceberg." Johns Hopkins University Press. Vitamin A Field Support Project (VITAL) Report No. TA-2. Quisumbing, A,, and J. Maluccio. 2000. "Intrahousehold International Life Sciences Institute, Washington, DC. Allocatio~iand Gender Relations: New Empirical Evidence Pelletier, D. L., K. Deneke,Y. Kidane,B. Haile,and G. Negussie. from Four Developing Countries." Food Consumption and 1995. "The Food-First Bias and Nutrition Policy: Lessons Nutrition Division Discussion Paper #&1.IFPRl (International from Ethiopia." Food Policy 20: 279-98. Fwd Policy Research Institute), Washington, IX. Pena, C., P. Webb, and L. Haddad. 1996. "Women's Eco~iomic Quisumbing, A., L. Brown, L. Haddad, and R. Meinzen-Dick. Advancement through Agricultural Change: A Review of 1998. "Gender Issues for Food Security in Developi~ig Donor Experience." Food Consumpti011 and Nutrition Countries: Implicatio~isfor Project Design and Implementa- D'lvlslon Discussion Paper #lo. IFPRI, Washington, DC. ': tion." CnnndiorllorrrrinlofDer~clopinentStrrdies 19: 185-208. Phillips, M, T. Sanghvi, R. Suarez, J. McKigney, and J. Fiedler. Quisumbi~~g,A., L. Brown, H. Feldstein, L. Haddad, and C. 1996. "The Costs and Effectiveness of Three Vitamin A Pena. 1995. "Women: The Key To Food Security." Food Interventio~~sin Guatemala." Socinl Scic,rrce O Medicirte 42: Policy Report. International Food Policy Research Institute, 1661-8. Washington, IX. Pingali, P. 2004."Climate Change and Food Systems." I'aper pre- Ramakrishnan, U. 2002. "Prevalence of Micronutrient sented at the OECD Global Forum on Sustainable Malnutrition Worldwide." Nrrtritiorr Reoiero 60(5Pt 2): S46-52. Development: Development and Climate Change, Ravi C., and D. Roy. 2006. "Consumption Diversification in ENV/EPC/GF/SD/RD(20CW)ll/FINAL, Paris, OECD India: How Has It Been and How Will It Be?" Photocopy. (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). IFPRI, Washington, DC. Pinstrup-Anderse~i, 1'. 1982. "Introducing Nutritional Ravi C., S. M. Dev, B. Viswanathan, A. Gulati and S. Considerations into Agricultural and Rural Developme~~t." Ramachander. 2004. "Eco~iomicLiberalization, Targeted Food nr~dNlrtritiorr Brrlletirr 4 (2). Programmes and Household Food Security: A Case Study of I'instrup-Andersen, P. 1981. Ntrtritiorrnl Corrseqltcnces of India." MTID Discussion Paper 68. IFPRI, Washington, DC. Ayric~rlhrrnlProjects: Corrsel?trtnlRrlntiorzslrips ottd Assessrnerrt Reardon, T., and J. Berdegue. 2002. "The Rapid Rise of Approod~es.Washington, DC: World Bank. Supermarkets in ati ill America: challenges and Pinstrup-Andersen, P., and E. Schider.2001.SeedsofCorrtrrztiorr: Opportunities for Development." Deoeloprnrrlt Policy Reoiero World H~rrtyer-ortd the Globnl Corltrot~ersyover GM Crops. 20 (4): 371-88. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Rich, K. M., and C. A. Narrod. 2005. "Perspectives on Supply Pinstrup-Andersen, P., A. Berg, and M. Forman. 1984. Chain Management of High Value Agriculture: The Role of Irrfer~tntiormlAyric~rltrrrnl R~senrcllnrrd Hrrrirnrr N~rtritiorl. 1'~lblic-Private Partnerships in Promoting Smallholder Rome, Italy: UN Administrative Committee on Co-ordina- Access." Draft. ti011 Sub-committee on Nutrition. Washington, DC: Roberfroid, M. 2002. "Global View of Functional Foods. International Food Policy Research Institute. European Perspectives. British /orrrrtnl of Nlrtritiorr 87 Pokliarel, C. 2003. "Agricultural Diversificatio~iin Nepal." (Supplement 2): S139-S143. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Rokx, C. 2000. "Who Should Implement Nutrition Agriculture Diversification and Vertical Integration in South Interventions?-The Application of I~lstitutionalEco~lomics Asia, November 5-7, 2003, New Delhi, India, joi~itlyorga- to Nutrition and the Sig~~ificaliceof Various Constraints to nized by ICRISAT, FICCI, and IFPRI. the Implementation of Nutrition Interventions." Health, Popkin, B. M. 2002. "An Overview on the Nutrition Transition Nutrition, and Populatio~iDiscussion Paper. World Bank, and Its Health Implications: The Bellagio Meeting." Prrblic Washington, DC. Henltlr N~rtritrori5, (1A): 93-103. Roos, N., M. M. Islam, and S. H. Thilsted. 2003. "Small Popkin, B. M. 2006. "Technology, Transport, Globalization And I~idige~~ousFish Species in Bangladesh: Contribution to The Nutritio~iTransition F w d Policy." Food Policy 31:554-69. Vitamin A, Calcium and Iron Intakes." /orrr~zalofN~ltritiort, Popkin, B. M. 1999. "Urbanization, Lifestyle Changes and the 133(11Suppl 2), 4021S26S. Nutrition Transition." World Der~elq~~irnrt.27: 1905-16. Ruel, M. 2001. "Can Food-Based Strategies Help Reduce Popkin, B. M, and S. Du. 2003. "Dynamics of the Nutrition Vitamin A and Iron Deficiencies? A Review of Recent Transition toward the Animal Foods Sector in China and Its Evidence." Food Policy Reoierr~5. International Food Policy Implications: A Worried Perspective." /orrrrrnl of Nlrtritiorr. Research Institute. 133:3898s-906s. Sahn, D. E., P. A. Dorosh, and S. D. Younger. 1997. Strlrct~rrol Popkin, B. M., F. S.Solon, T. Fer~iandes,and M. C. Latham. 1980. Adjrrstrrterlt Rccor~sidcred:Ecorrorrric Policynrtd Poverty in Africo. "Benefit-Cost A~~aIysisin the Nutrition Area: A Project in the Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Philippines." Sorinl Scierlce D Medicirre 14C:207-16. Sanders, J. H., B. I. Shapiro, and S. Ramaswamy. 1996. Tlie Pretty, J., and J.Hine. 2001. Redrrcirry Food Porlcrtyrrritlr Srrstnir~nblr Ecor~oriricsof Ayricrrltr~rnlTcclrrtoloyyin Srrrrinrid S~tb-Soluornri Ayrictrltrrrc~.SAFE-World Project, Centre for Environment and Africo. Baltimore: MD: JohnsHopkills University Press. Society, University of Essex, Colcliester, UK. Schroeder, T. C., A. P. Berkeley, and K. C. Schroeder. 1995. Price, G., R. Landes, and A . Govindan. 2003. "India's Pulse "Income Growth and International Meat Consumption." Sector: Results of Field Research." WRS-03-01, USDA/ERS lorrrr~oloflrlterrtotioriol Food old Axribrrsirtess Morketirly 7(3): (US Departmentof AgricuIture/Economic Research Service). 15-30. Pyakuryal, B., Y. B. Thapa, and D. Roy. 2005. "Trade Liberal- Schroeder, D. G., R. Martorell, J. A. Rivera, M. RueI, and J. P. ization and Food Security in Nepal." MTID Discussion Habicht. 1995."Age Differences in the Impact of Nutritional Paper, 88. IFPRI (International Food Policy Research Supplementation on Growth." lo~trrrnlof N~rtritiotr. 125: Institute), Washington, DC. 1051S59S. Quisumbing, A. 2003. Ho~rsellold Decisiorrs, Gerrder, ord Scrimshaw, N. S., and M. Behar. 1976.N~rtritionnrrd Ayrict~lt~rrnl Der~c~loprtrrrrt.S!/rrtlresis ofRecrnt Reseorcll. Washington, DC: A D~.rreloprtrcrrt.New York and London: Plenum Press. 82 From A~ricultureto Nutrition: Pathwavs. Svner~ies,and Ourcomes SDPl (SustainabIe Development Policy Institute). 2004. Tangka, F., E. A. Ouma, and S. J. Staal. 1999."Women and the "Regoverning Markets: Securing Small Holder Producer Sustainable Developme~itof Market-Oriented Dairying: Participatio~i in Restructured National and Agri-Food Evidence from the Highlands of East Africa." International Systems." Pakistan. www.regoveniingmarkets.org.Accessed SustainableDevelopment Research Conference, Leeds, U.K. February 15,2005. Teranishi, J. 1997. "Sectoral Resource Transfer, Conflict and Shepherd, A. W. 2005. Tl~e lmplicntions of Slrpermnrket Macro Stability in Eco~iomicDevelopment: A Comparative Developmentfor Hortic~rlt~rrnlFormersnttd TrnditionnlMnrketing Analysis." In The Role of Government in Enst Asinrz Economic Systems in Asin. Agricultural Management, Marketing and Developr7ient, CompnrntiveInstit~rtionnlAnnlysis,ed. N. Aoki, Finance Service, FAO. Rome, Italy: FAO. Y. K. Kim,and N. Okuno-Fujiwara. Oxford:Clarendon Press. Shrimpton, R., C. G. Victora, M. de Onis, R. Costa Lima, M. Thirtle, C., L. Beyers, L. Lin, V. McKenzie-Hill, X. Irz, S. Blossner, and G. Clugston. 2001. "Worldwide Timing of Wiggins, and J. Piesse. 2002. The Impnct of Chnges in Growth Faltering: Implications for Nutritio~iaI Agricrrltrrrnl Prodrrctivity on tlre Incidence of Poverty irt Interventions." Pediatrics 107(5):1-7. Developing Corrntries.Report to Department for lnter~iational Smitasiri, S.2000. "A Comment on How the Nutritional Impact Development (DfID). London & East Kilbride, UK. of Agricultural Imiovations Can Be Enhanced." Food nr~d Thomas, H (ed.).2006. Trnde Refornls nrzd Food Sccr~rity:Co~rntry Nlrtrition B~rlletin21 (4):5034. Cnse Strrdiesnnd Synthesis.Rome, Italy: FAO. Smitasiri, S., and S. Dhanamitta. 1999. "Sustaining Behavior Thompson, P. M., P. Sultana, M. Nuruzzaman, and A. Firoz Change to Enhance Micronutrient Status: Community and Khan. 2000. "Impacts of Aquaculture Extension 011Pond Women-Based Interventions in Thailand." Research Report Operators and the Rural Community," Tenth Biennial No. 2, ICRW/OMNI (International Center for Research on Conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Women/Opportunities for Micronutrient Interventions). Eco~iomicsand Trade. Oregon. ICRW, Washington, DC. Thomson, E.C. 1978. "The Symbiosis of Scientist, Planner, and SmitasiriS., K. Sa-ngobwarchar P. Kongpunya, C.Subsuwan, 0 . Administrator in Nutrition Program Implementation." In Banjong, C. Chitchumroonechokchai, W. Rusami-Sopaporn, Nutrition nnd Nntionnl Policy, ed. B. Winikoff, 393423. S. Veeravong, and S. Dhanamitta. 1999. "Sustaining Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Behavioural Change to Enhance Micronutrient Status Thorbecke, E. 2000. "Agricultural Markets Beyond through Community and Women-Based Interventions in Liberalization: The Role of the State." In AgricrrltrrrnlMnrkets Northeast Thailand: Vitamin A," Food nnd N~rtritiorzBlrlletirl Beyond Libmlitntiorz, ed. A. van Tilburg, H. A. J. Moll, and A. 20 (2):24S51. Kuyvenhoven. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Smith, L.C., H. Alderman, and D. Aduayom. 2006. "Food Publishers. I~isecurity in Sub-Saharan Africa. New Estimates from Todd, E. 1997. "Epidemiology of Food-Bonie Diseases: A Household Expenditure Surveys." Research Report No. 146. World-Wide Review." World Henlth Stntistics(50):3C-50. International Food Research Policy Institute,Washington, DC. Tohill, 8.C. 2004. "The Evidence on Fruits and Vegetables and Soleri, D., D. A. Cleveland, and A. Wood. 1991a. "Vitamin A Body Weight." Background Document 4-c. Prepared for the Nutrition and Gardens Bibliography." Vitamin A Field Joint FAO/WHO Workshop on Fruits and Vegetables for Support Project (VITAL), Report No. IN-1. VITAL, Health, Kobe, Japan, September 1-3,2004. International Life Sciences Institute, Arlington, VA. Tontisirin, K., and S. Gillespie. 1999. "Linking Community- Soleri, D., D. A. Cleveland, and T. R. Frankenberger. 1991b Based Programs and Service Delivery for Improving Gardens and Vitamin A: A Review of Recent Literature." Maternal and Child Nutrition." Asinn Dcr~clopr?rcntRcvierr*17: Vitamin A Field Support Project (VITAL), Report No. 1N-2. 3345. VITAL, International Life Sciences Institute, Arlington, VA. Torero, M., and A. Gulati. 2004. Conrlectir~gSrrinll Holders to Solon, F., H. Briones, J. R. Femandez, and L. B. Shafritz. 1996. Mnrkets: Role of Ir~finstrzrctrrrenrld Instit~rtiorts.Washington, Moving to a long-term strategy: increasing vegetable gar- DC: International Food Policy Research Institute. dening and consumption in the Philippines. In Strategiesfor Trueblood, M., and S. Shapouri. 2001 "lmplications of Trade Promoting Vitnmir~A Prod~rctior~,Corrsrirnptior~nrrd S~lpplerr~eir- Liberalization on Food Security of Low-Income Countries: tntion. Fotrr Case St~rdies,ed. R. E. Seidel. Washington, DC: Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 765-5." (U.S. Academy for Educational Development. Department of Agriculture),Washington, DC. Solon, F., T. L. Fernandez, M.C. Latham, and B. M. Popkin. 1979. Tschirley, D., and M. Ayieko. 2005. "Changing Horticultural "An Evaluation of Strategies to Control Vitamin A Supply Chains in Africa: Implications for Government and Deficiencies in the Philippines." Arnrricnn jorrrrinl of Clir~icnl Donor Investments; Evidence from Kenya and lmplicatio~is N~rtrition32: 144-53. for Africa." Prese~itatio~iat the World Bank, Washington, Sommer, A., and K. P. West. 1996. Vitnrnin A Deficirizcy: Henltli, DC, April 6,2005. Sl~wivnlnnd Vision. New York: Oxford University Press. UN SCN (United Nations Standing Committee on Nutrition). Spielman, D. 2007. "Pro-Poor Agricultural Biotechnology: Can 2000. "Fourth Report on the World Nutrition Situation." UN the lnternatio~ialResearch System Deliver the Goods?" Food SCN/IFPRI (International Food Policy Research Institute), Policy32: 189-204. Geneva, Switzerland. Talukder, A., L. Kiess, N. Huq, S. de Pee, 1. Darnton-Hill, and -. 2004. "Fifth Report on the World Nutrition Situation: M.W. Bloem. 2000. "Increasing the Production and Nutrition for lmproved Development Outcomes." UN SCN, Consumption of Vitamin A-Rich Fruits and Vegetables: Geneva, Switzerland. Lessons Learned in Taking the Bangladesh Homestead UNICEF (United Nations Children's Fund). 1990. Strfltegyfor Gardening Programme to a National Scale." Food nrld Irrq7roried N~rtritiorrof Clrildren nr~dWor?ren ir~Drvelopir~g Nrrtrition B~rlletin21 (2):165-72. Corrrltrirs. UNICEF Policy Review. New York: UNICEF. Tam, P. 2004. "Regoverning Markets: Securing Small Holder Unnevehr, L., and N. Hirschhorn. 2000. Food Snfety Issrrrs in tlfc Producer Participation in Restructured National and Agri- Drr~clopir~gWorld. World Bank Technical Paper 469, World Food Systems, The Case of Vietnam." www.regoverning- Bank, Washington, DC. markets.org. Accessed February 15,2005. Biblioeraohv 83 USDA (U.S.Department of Agriculture).2002."Thailand Retail Co~itrolof Vitamin A Deficiency in Developi~igCountries." Food Sector GAIN Report." Foreign Agricultural Service, jorirnnl of N~rtrition32: 2920s-265. USDA, Washiligto~i,DC. WHO (World Health Organization). 2002. Food Safety and Food- -. 2003. "Indonesia Retail Food Sector GAIN Report," Borne Illness. Geneva, Switzerland:WHO. Foreign Agricultural Service,USDA, Washington, DC. 2006. "Obesity and Overweight: WHO Fact Sheet." --. 2004a. "HRI Food Service Sector Thailand." Foreign http:/ /www.who.int/mediace1itre/factsheets/fs3ll/e1~/ Agricultural ServiceGAIN Report TH4030. Washingto~i,W. index.htm1.Accessed November 28,2006. http:/ /www.fas.usda.gov/gauifiles/200403/146105693.pd~. -. 2005. Preventing Clrror~icDiseases A Vital bzvestr1rent. 2004b. Vegetnbles nrtd Melons: Sitrrntron nnd Outlook Geneva, Switzerland:WHO. Yeorbook. Washington, DC: Economics Research Service, WHO (World Health Organization) and FA0 (Food and USDA, July. Agriculture Organizatio~~).2006. G~ridelines or1 Food Valdivia, C.2001."Gender, Livestock Assets, ResourceManage- Fortificntiorl zuitlr Micronrrtrients, ed. L. Allen, B. de Benoist, 0 . ment, and Food Security: Lesso~lsfrom the SRCRSP." Dary, R. Hurrell. WHO and FAO. Agric~rltlrrenr~dHrrnlnn Vnlrres18(1):27-39. -. 2003.joirlt W H O F A 0 Expert Co~ts~tltotionon Diet,.Nzrtrition von Braun, J. 1988. "Effects of Tech~iologicalChange in nnd the Prez~entiorl of Chronic Diseases. WHO, Geneva, Agriculture on Food Consumption and Nutrition: Rice in a Switzerland. West African Setting." World Dm~eloptnent.16: 108S98. Wickramasinghe P. J., T. Abeysekera, and A. Herath. 2003. von Braun, J., and E. Kennedy (eds.). 1994. Agric~rlt~rrol "Agricultural Diversificatio~iin Sri Lanka." Paper presented Corrrr~rercialiurtior~,Ecorzorrlic De71eloprrrent. nrzd N~rtritiorl. at the International Workshop on Agricultural Diversifica- Baltimore, MD: JohnsHopkills Uliiversity Press. tion and Vertical Integration in South Asia, November 5-7, vo~iBraun, J., and E. Kennedy. 1986. "Commercialization of New Delhi, India, jointly organized by ICRISAT, FICCI,and Subsistelice Agriculture: Illcome and Nutritional Effects in IFPRI. Developing Co~uitries."Working papers on commercializa- Wild, S., G. Roglic, A. Green, R. Sicree, and H. King. 2004. tion of agriculture and nutritioll. IFPRI (Inteniational Food "Global Prevale~iceof Diabetes: Estimates for 2000 and Policy Research Institute),Washington, DC. Projectio~isfor 2030." Dinbctcs Core 27: 1047-53. vo~iBraun,I., and E. Kennedy. 1994.Agricrrltlrrnl Cornmercialiur- Williams, G. W. 1984. "Development and Future Direction of tion, Ecor~orrricDez~eloprrretrt,and N~rtrition.Baltimore, MD: the World Soybean Market." QunrtrrlyIorrrnnl of lrtlrrrmtionnl JohnsHopkins University Press. Agriculture 23: 319-37. vo~iBraun, J., H. de Haen, and J. Blanken. 1991. "Commercial- Winikoff, B. 1978. "Program and Policy: Some Specific izatio~iof Agriculture under Populatio~iPressure:Effects on Questions." I11Nutrition and National Policy, ed. B Winikoff, Production, Consumption, and Nutrition in Rwanda." 52346.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Research Report #85.IFI'RI, Washington, DC. World Bank.2006a. Repositioning Nutrition as Central to von Braun, J.,K. Johm,and D. Puetz. 1994."Nutritional Effects Developrnerzt: A Strntegy for Large-Scnle Artion. World Bank, of Curnmercialization of a Woman's Crop: Irrigated Rice in Washington, DC. The Gambia." In Ayric~rltrrrnlCommercinlimtior~,Ecorzomic 2006b. "Aquaculture: Changing the Face of the Waters. Dtveloyrr~rr~tnrtd Nlrtritior~,ed. J von Braun and E. Kennedy, . Meeting the Promise and Challe~ige of Sustai~iable 34342. Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkills University Press. AquacuIture." Report No. 36622.GLB. World Bank, Wang, J., and D. Ni. 1995."A Comparative Study of the Ability Washington, DC. of Fish to Catch Mosquito Larvae." In Rice-Fish Cult~rre171 2006~.Chinn's Corrtplinrtcewith Food Snfety Requiren~entsfor Cltirzo, ed. K. T. Mackey.Ottawa, Canada: IDRC. Fruits and Vegetnbles:Promoting Food Snfety, Competitiveness Waterlow, J. C., and P. R. Payne. 1975. "The Protein Gap." arzd Poverty Redrrction. World Bank, Washington, DC and Nnt~rre258: 11S17. Beijing, China. Weerahewa, J. 2004. "Impacts of Trade Liberalization and -. 2005."From Competitio~iat Home toCompeti~igAbroad: Market Reforms on the Paddy/Ricc Sector in Sri Lnnka." The Case of l~idia~iHorticulture" (photocopy).World Bank, MTlD Discussion Paper 70. IFPRI,Washington, DC. Washington, DC. Weinberger, K., and T. Lumpkin. 2005. "High Value 2005a. Agricrrlt~rre and Achievirtg the Mrllenni~rm Agricultural Products ill Asia and the Pacific forSmallholder Development Gonls. Report No. 32729-GLB.World Bank and Farmers: Trends, Opportunities and Research Priorities." IFPRI, Washington, DC. Paper presented at workshop Horu tlre Poor Benefit frorrr 1986. The Hesitnnt Recovery and Prospects for Sustained Grozi~ic~yMnrkets for High Volrre Agricrrlt~rrnlProd~rcts.CIAT Grorutlz, Trnde nr~dPricing Policies in World Agriclrltzrre. New Headquarters, Cali, Columbia. AVRDC. York:Oxford University Press. Wellenius, B. 1993. Telecorrrn~~rr~ications. World Bank Exprrierlce 2004. "Saving Fish and Fishers." Report No 29090-GLB. nrzd Strntegy. Washington, DC:World Bank. World Bank, Washington, DC. West, K. P. 2002. "Extent of Vitamin A Deficiency among Yach, D., C. Hawkes, C. L. Gould, and K. J. Hofman. 2004. Preschool Children and Women of Reproductive Age." "The Global Burden of Chronic Diseases: Overcomi~ig jo~rrr~nlof Nrrtritiorl 132:28575-66S. Impediments to Prevention and Control." loltrnnl of the West, C. E., A. Eilander, M. van Lieshout. 2000. "Consequences American Medical Association 291:2616-22. of Revised Estimates of Carotenoid Bioefficacy for Dietary ' THEWORLD BANK International~ o o Poiicy ~esearct~ d institute IM Agriculture & Rural Development Department World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433 http:l/www.worldbank.org/rural