INTEGRATED SAFEGUARDS DATA SHEET APPRAISAL STAGE Report No.: ISDSA2770 Public Disclosure Copy Date ISDS Prepared/Updated: 21-Feb-2013 Date ISDS Approved/Disclosed: 10-Jan-2013, 22-Feb-2013 I. BASIC INFORMATION 1. Basic Project Data Country: Vietnam Project ID: P123384 Project Name: Danang Sustainable City Development Project (SCDP) (P123384) Task Team Cuong Duc Dang Leader: Estimated 12-Dec-2012 Estimated 14-May-2013 Appraisal Date: Board Date: Managing Unit: EASVS Lending Specific Investment Loan Instrument: Sector: General water, sanitation and flood protection sector (60%), General transportation sector (40%) Theme: Urban services and housing for the poor (30%), Municipal governance and institution building (30%), Pollution management and environ mental health (20%), Infrastructure services for private sector development (10%), Other urban development (10%) Financing (In USD Million) Public Disclosure Copy Financing Source Amount BORROWER/RECIPIENT 69.70 International Development Association (IDA) 202.50 Total 272.20 Environmental B - Partial Assessment Category: Is this a No Repeater project? 2. Project Objectives The proposed Project Development Objective (PDO) is to expand access of city residents to improved drainage, wastewater collection and treatment services, the road network, and public transport in selected areas of Da Nang. 3. Project Description The project consists of five main components as follows: Page 1 of 10 Component 1: Drainage and Wastewater Improvement (US$ 92.0 million) Leveraging investments under the previous two World Bank funded projects (3 Cities Sanitation Project, and ongoing Priority Infrastructure Investment Project), this component will help Da Nang Public Disclosure Copy further implement its wastewater management strategy to meet the wastewater and drainage improvement targets for 2030, including reducing flooding, upgrading and expanding wastewater collection systems in fast growing areas of Da Nang (including lagging area of Lien Chieu), and upgrading and expansion of wastewater and drainage systems in central districts. This component includes activities aiming for (i) storm water and drainage improvement, (ii) wastewater collection and treatment. The project will support balanced improvements in wastewater treatment capacity through construction of a new Lienchieu secondary WWTP (planned and prepared under PIIP with initial capacity of 40,000m3/day) and expansion of Hoaxuan WWTP constructed under PIIP from 20,000m3/day to 40,000m3/day, upgrading of four existing WWTPs, and transmission and collection capacity improvements through construction of transmission pipelines and interceptors, and a 40,000 house connection program. A house connection policy has been prepared and approved by the People's Committee, before Project Appraisal, the first policy of this kind in Vietnam. This policy not only has implication for environmental quality, but affords the City a powerful tool for implementing land use plans. The Project will also upgrade Bautram and Bausau retention lakes for storm water, thus leveraging available drainage capacity. Finally, it will also upgrade a number of drains in lagging areas identified as having a lack of capacity by application of the hydraulic model developed under PIIP. Component 2: Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Development (US$ 50.2 million) The pilot BRT system was derived from the city's 2030 Master Plan which calls for a significant expansion of the City's public transport system with BRT as its backbone. The basic BRT trunk route is approximately 23.8 km long and connects the Hoa Khanh Industrial area in the north with the emerging higher education zone in the south (Han Viet College, American University). The trunk route will initially operate both on a median transitway (roughly 55%) and, where constrained by available right of way, in mixed traffic (45%). For the mixed traffic portion, a variety of strategies Public Disclosure Copy will be used to provide BRT with priority over general traffic to increase speed and improve reliability. In a subsequent phase, after development and implementation of a parking management policy, it is anticipated that the BRT trunk route would operate on a dedicated median transitway from terminal to terminal. Three additional BRT services could extend beyond the trunk, to Hoi An, the major tourist destination approximately 35 Km south of the Da Nang CBD, and to other major tourist and employment nodes in the City. The elements of the pilot BRT system that will be financed under this component are (TA for DATRAMAC is financed under component 4): • 216 stations/stops of which 50 would be on the 23.8 Km. BRT trunk, 166 on the three other BRT routes off the trunk; • two major terminals, one at each end of the trunk corridor; • 13.0 Km of dedicated median transitways on the basic BRT trunk route; • 81 low emissions BRT vehicles for the 4 BRT routes; • A BRT vehicle maintenance and parking facility (depot) at the northern terminus of the project at the western side of the Hoa Khanh Industrial Park; • A variety of road and pedestrian safety improvement measures along the corridor and adjacent streets including sidewalks and traffic light; and • Intelligent transportation system (ITS) applications to facilitate BRT operations and management, including an IC/Smart card based fare collection system. Page 2 of 10 Component 3: Urban strategic roads (US$ 77.9 million) The component will finance two new arterial roads with a total length of about 11.5km, which were Public Disclosure Copy identified as strategic roads in the City's Master Plan. Both roads will improve urban connectivity between the city's local arterial system and the national road network, in particular providing east/ west arterial connections to the north/south City By-Pass and national expressway network. Investments will include: (a) construction of the Nguyen Tat Thanh extension; (b) construction of the Hoa Phuoc – Hoa Khuong Road; (c) compensation, resettlement, rehabilitation and livelihood restoration of Project Affected Persons (PAPs), including construction of basic infrastructure for resettlement sites (e.g., local roads, electricity, water, and sewage systems); and (d) related construction supervision services. In accordance with the City Master Plan, the two roads will also facilitate development of new residential and economic zones in the western part of the city. These road links are also needed for the City's public transport network which will be ultimately be extended to these newly urbanizing areas. They will help accommodate the rapid urban population growth expected in the near to medium term, particularly by providing improved access for lower and middle income groups housed and working I these areas to the rest of the City. Component 4: Technical Assistance and Capacity Building (US$ 15.3 million) Continuing the urban infrastructure management technical assistance provided under the ongoing PIIP, this component will improve Da Nang's institutional capacity for sustainable urban development, focusing on: (i) planning, management, operations and finance for storm drainage, wastewater collection and treatment, and private sector participation in the sector; (ii) public transport planning, management and operations, road safety, urban traffic and parking management; (iii) capacity of city departments in procurement, management and monitoring of public service performance contracts; (iv) formulation and monitoring of “green development and sustainability indicators; and (v) project implementation support. Component 5: Transferred Activities of Da Nang Priority Infrastructure Investment Project (US$ 36.8 million) Public Disclosure Copy This component will help Da Nang complete some major infrastructure for which construction started under the ongoing Da Nang Priority Infrastructure Investment Projects. Due to the project funding constraints, the PIIP could not entirely finance the activities. These include: (a) Construction of southern road link (connect to the Hoaphuoc-Hoakhuong road) – implementation is ongoing; (b) Construction of Hoa Xuan WWTP (20,000m3/day), upgrading of Son Tra WWTP (20,000m3/day), and construction of Phuloc bridge and embankment of Phuloc river mount – implementation is ongoing; (c) Associated construction supervision and safeguards monitoring services – existing contracts. 4. Project location and salient physical characteristics relevant to the safeguard analysis (if known) The project is located in Da Nang City. Da Nang is the fourth largest city in Vietnam and has provincial status, endowing it with a certain degree of administrative autonomy. It is widely viewed as a ‘forward looking’ city which is well planned, well governed and which enjoys a generally higher quality of infrastructure than other cities. Da Nang is the most important city in the central coastal region with aspirations to serve as a regional economic hub, and serves as the gateway to international markets. The urban population rate of Da Nang City is exceptionally high compared to cities of the same level of per capita, even higher than that of HCMC. This is due to the fact that most districts in Da Nang City are urban districts, with one rural district. However, the city's Page 3 of 10 economic competitiveness level is not as strong as that in Hanoi, HCMC or Haiphong. The city leaders have committed to developing the city into a “green� city by 2025. As such, the development plan of the city endorses moving toward higher value added and cleaner industries, including high Public Disclosure Copy technology and tourism. 5. Environmental and Social Safeguards Specialists Hoa Thi Mong Pham (EASVS) Khang Van Pham (EASVS) 6. Safeguard Policies Triggered? Explanation (Optional) Environmental Assessment OP/ Yes BP 4.01 Natural Habitats OP/BP 4.04 No Forests OP/BP 4.36 No Pest Management OP 4.09 No Physical Cultural Resources OP/ Yes BP 4.11 Indigenous Peoples OP/BP 4.10 No Involuntary Resettlement OP/BP Yes 4.12 Safety of Dams OP/BP 4.37 No Projects on International No Public Disclosure Copy Waterways OP/BP 7.50 Projects in Disputed Areas OP/BP No 7.60 II. Key Safeguard Policy Issues and Their Management A. Summary of Key Safeguard Issues 1. Describe any safeguard issues and impacts associated with the Restructured project. Identify and describe any potential large scale, significant and/or irreversible impacts: OP 4.01 Environmental Assessment The project includes three components of civil works: (a) drainage and wastewater improvement, (b) bus rapid transit development, and (c) urban strategic roads. Based on the type, location, sensitivity, and scale of the project and the nature and magnitude of its potential environmental impacts, the project was classified as Category B. The project is expected to have mostly positive environmental, health and economic impacts as it addresses issues of (a) drainage and wastewater, (b) public transport and (c) connection of city ring road network. Potential negative impacts of the project are expected to be small, localized, short-term and mitigable. The negative environmental and social impacts related to the project implementation are mainly from splitting of communities, land acquisition and resettlement, traffic disturbance, solid wastes from construction, cultivation disturbance, and wastewater discharges from drainage, sewers and treatment plants. Page 4 of 10 Construction-related impacts: Construction-related impacts include impacts from dust, noise, exhaust emissions, waste oil and grease, wastewater and run-off, construction waste, traffic congestion, cultivation disturbance and worker safety. Public Disclosure Copy Operation-related impacts: Operation of roads and wastewater treatment plants may cause major environmental and social issues such as traffic accidents, exhaust emissions, noise, community split, inundation, wastes and WTP sludge. One of the civil works relates to the construction of a new WWTP at Lien Chieu –which was originally to be undertaken in the ongoing PIIP –but was transferred to the Da Nang SCDP due to project funding constraints within the PIIP. The Environmental Assessment (EA) for this Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), however, has already been prepared according to the Bank requirements under the ongoing PIIP project. Given size and nature of investment for other project components, it was decided that one Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), including Environmental Management Plan (EMP) would be prepared prior to appraisal for the entire project regardless of source financing, including ancillary facilities such as pumping stations, bus depots, and BRT terminals. The EMP includes (a) Environmental Codes of Practice (ECOP) for each type of project activities, namely water and wastewater collection facilities, road construction and maintenance, and construction of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system, (c) Chance Finds Procedure, and (d) management plan for Physical Cultural Resources (PCRs), if screening confirms that there will be impacts on any PCR other than the house graves. OP 4.11 Physical Cultural Resources There are 382 graves which have to be relocated. Consultations showed that affected community members agreed with the required removal of the affected graves and mitigation measures that will be implemented. OP 4.12 Involuntary Resettlement Impacts due to land acquisition and resettlement are detailed below. Public Disclosure Public Disclosure Copy All draft safeguards instruments namely the EIA, EMP, and RPs for the proposed project have been prepared and disclosed locally at the project area, at the Bank’s office (VDIC) in Hanoi, and InfoShop, in accordance with the World Bank's policy on access to information. The EIA report and RPs in Vietnamese language have been disclosed locally in project ward/commune people's committees, project district people's committees on April 3rd and October 8, 2012 respectively, and in Vietnam Development Information Center (VDIC) on October 12, 2012. The English version of the EIA and RP reports were disclosed in the World Bank InfoShop on October 18, 2012. 2. Describe any potential indirect and/or long term impacts due to anticipated future activities in the project area: None are expected. 3. Describe any project alternatives (if relevant) considered to help avoid or minimize adverse impacts. Analysis of alternatives including the “without project� situation in terms of their potential environmental impacts and the feasibility of mitigating these impacts is detailed in the EIA report. For the construction of two ring roads under Component 3, the alignment selected would ensure the Project implementation will not imply outstanding environmental and social impacts due to land acquisition, or the community members displacement. For Component 2, the best depot and Page 5 of 10 terminal locations have been selected to reduce negative impacts due to land acquisition, resettlement and others related. 4. Describe measures taken by the borrower to address safeguard policy issues. Provide an Public Disclosure Copy assessment of borrower capacity to plan and implement the measures described. OP4.01 Environment assessment (i) Safeguard Instruments Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): The environmental impact assessment (EIA) was conducted for this project by Da Nang PMU. The draft EIA report was officially submitted to the Bank on October 10, 2012. The environmental assessment evaluates the project's environmental risks and impacts in its area of influence; examines the project alternatives; identifies ways of siting, planning, design, and implementation by preventing, minimizing, mitigating, or compensating for adverse environmental and social impacts and enhancing positive impacts; and includes the process of mitigating and managing environmental and social impacts throughout the project implementation. The EIA for the new Lien Chieu WWTP (now transferred to the Da Nang SCDP) has already been approved by the Bank under the PIIP. Environmental Management Plan (EMP): The EMP is prepared as integral part of the EIA report. The EMP details (a) the mitigation, monitoring and institutional measures to be taken during the implementation and operation of the project to eliminate or offset adverse environmental and social impacts or to reduce them to acceptable levels; (b) measures to enhance positive environmental and social impacts; and (c) the actions needed to implement these measures. Resettlement Plan (RP): During the project preparation, technical options were carefully analyzed in all components to minimize the scope of land acquisition and its consequent impacts. Two Resettlement Plans (RPs) were prepared: one denominated “first� for 2.7 km of the Northern road funded by the City; and the “second� for the rest of the Project Components 1, 2 and 3. (ii) Mitigation measures Environmental Codes of Practice (ECOP): ECOPs are used to address construction-related impacts, which are mostly temporary and similar in different locations. They should be included in the bidding documents for construction contractors. An ECOP contains guidelines on good Public Disclosure Copy practices in managing construction activities, standard environmental conditions for an activity based on relevant national regulations,/standards/specifications, and criteria that determine when and to what extent a code applies to an activity, and advisory notes on actions needed to assist in reaching compliance with the standard environmental conditions. Mitigation measures in the Environmental Management Plan (EMP): The EMP covers detailed technical and institutional measures to (a) mitigate negative environmental and social impacts arising from the project implementation in pre-construction, construction and operation phases and (b) adapt to climate change (taking into account of the sea level rise and increasing of flooding). Furthermore, measures to green the project design such as planting trees around WWTPs and lakes, in resettlement sites, along canal banks and roadsides were also incorporated. In addition to the social impact management measures, the EMP includes (a) an information and communication program, (b) a grievance redress mechanism, and (c) a monitoring and evaluation system. Compensation and resettlement: The mitigation measures are provided in the RPs to ensure affected people will be able to fully restore or improve the lost assets and livelihood. All compensation and land acquisition costs will be financed by counterpart funds and detailed as part of the RP report. (iii) Implementation Arrangements EMP implementation: Mitigation measures during construction will be implemented by contractors with the cost incorporated in the bidding proposal and be closely supervised by the construction management consultants (CMC), local authority (e.g., Da Nang DONRE and district Page 6 of 10 people's committees) and affected communities. Operation mitigation measures including the operation of wastewater treatment plants will be undertaken by the facility operator under supervision of Da Nang DONRE. The cost estimates for EMP implementation throughout the Public Disclosure Copy project is 144,000 US$ including the cost of (a) monitoring program and (b) capacity development and training. The cost of mitigation measures is included in the construction cost. Monitoring and supervision arrangements: The Da Nang PMU is responsible for EMP implementation and will report compliance as part of semi-annual progress reports submitted to IDA, copied to DONRE. Construction management consultants will supervise environmental compliance by the construction contractors. An environmental monitoring consultant (EMC) will be hired to provide monitoring of the overall project impacts and provide guidance to communities in environmental monitoring, to CMC in supervising environmental mitigation measures by contractors, training of PMU staff, and to assist PMU in implementing the EMP. (iv) Capacity of the Borrower In 1999, Da Nang PMU founded an environmental and social safeguards unit with 9 persons in which 2 persons are in charge of environmental safeguards and the rest are in charge of social safeguards. They have experienced safeguards training courses organized by the Bank and have good safeguards experience with Priority Infrastructure Investment Project (PIIP). This unit will continue with Da Nang Sustainable City Development Project (SCDP). (v) Public Consultation Public consultations were conducted in two rounds during project preparation. The first public consultation took place from 3 to 6 April,2012 in 15 project communes and wards focusing on:(a) disseminating information about the proposed project's objectives, description and potential impacts and (b) getting the preliminary agreement of the project-affected persons and local NGOs (including Women's Union, Farmers' Union, Fatherland Front, Youth Union and Veterans' Organization) on collaboration on dealing with potential environmental and social issues throughout the project implementation. The second public round of consultations was conducted from 13 to 17 August in 18 communes and wards, and detailed environmental and social impacts and mitigation measures identified were presented in order to get further comments from the project-affected groups and local NGOs. All comments and suggestions from such groups as well Public Disclosure Copy as responses of the project owner have been incorporated in the final draft EIA report. Further consultations are expected to be held throughout the project implementation as necessary to address EA-related issues that affect such groups. In addition, during the elaboration of the RPs consultations were held with stakeholders and affected population. (vi) Disclosure In order to ensure meaningful consultations the Da Nang PMU provided relevant material prior to consultations. As mentioned in a section above, the EIA report and RPs in Vietnamese language have been disclosed locally in project ward/commune people's committees, project district people's committees on April 3rd and October 8, 2012 respectively, and in Vietnam Development Information Center (VDIC) on October 12, 2012. The English version of the EIA and RP reports were disclosed in the World Bank InfoShop on October 18, 2012. OP 4.11 Physical Cultural Resources (PCR) The EIA and RP identified the presence of PCRs in the project areas (graves to be removed). Impacts on identified PCRs, associated mitigation measures and monitoring are addressed in the EIAs and EMPs. No significant or non-reversible impacts on PCRs are expected. The EMPs also include clear guidance on the chance finds procedures to be followed, in line with Government regulations and consistent with Bank policy. Relocation of 382 graves will be conducted in full agreement with affected communities and families. The public consultation also included addressing adequately cultural and spiritual concerns. Page 7 of 10 OP4.12 Involuntary Resettlement During the project preparation, technical options were carefully analyzed in all components to Public Disclosure Copy minimize the scope of land acquisition and its consequent impacts. As agreed at the PCN stage, two Resettlement Plans (RPs) were prepared: one for 2.7 km of the Northern road funded by the City (first), which is expected to be completed by the end of 2013; and the other (second) for the project's Components 1, 2 and 3 to ensure that all project-affected persons will restore their lost assets and improve or, at least restore their livelihoods to pre-project levels. Intensive consultation with project-affected persons supported a meaningful participation. Project-affected persons’ recommendations and perceptions were incorporated as part of the RPs, reaching agreements on the project's intervention scope, proposed components, and proposed compensation and rehabilitations measures for project's impacts. The first RP was based on the approved PIIP Resettlement Policy Framework and the second RP will be approved before the project negotiation. The first RP addressed the impacts on 57 affected households with 43 of them requiring to be relocated due to a section of 2.7 km road, developed by the City. The first RP includes the due diligence (DD) review, comprises the compensation paid to 212 households, who lost land and those who will be losing agricultural land. The DD review showed that the policies applied to these DPs complied with the Bank's policies, and that most of the DPs have restored the livelihood. As reflected in the first RP, all compensation and resettlement activities related to this road section will be monitored and evaluated by the current PIIP PMU and the resettlement independent monitoring consultant to ensure full livelihood restoration of the DPs. According to the second RP which covers the rest of the project components, about 2798 DPs would be affected due to 89.4 ha of land acquisition required by the project, including 19.2 ha of residential, 62.3 ha of agricultural and 7.9 ha of other land. About 730 DPs will have to be relocated and 999 DPs will be losing 20% or more of their agricultural land. Five proposed resettlement sites, for DPs’ relocation will be covering 30.2 ha, located at 5 wards in three districts of the city. Most of the consulted DPs have agreed to move to the mentioned resettlement sites. The resettlement sites would be financed through retroactive financing from the Public Disclosure Copy Project's funds to ensure a timely relocation of the project DPs. Independent asset valuation, the PMU will hire a professional asset and land valuator at the initial stages of the resettlement implementation, to ensure that compensation for affected assets and land is paid at full replacement cost. Conducting assets’ market price and land replacement costs surveys as the basis to define the City's compensation rates, will be ensuring that compensation reflects full replacement costs. Independent resettlement monitoring, the PMU will contract an experienced independent resettlement monitoring agency (IMA) for external monitoring of the RP implementation. The IMA will submit its reports bi-annually to the PMU and to the Bank. The IMA will also conduct an evaluation of resettlement implementation 6-12 months after the completion of all resettlement activities to assess whether or not the DPs have been able to restore their lost assets, livelihoods and incomes to pre-project levels. If this evaluation indicates that DPs who have not recovered their livelihoods according to the project objectives, additional assistance will be provided to ensure that they can fully restore their pre-project situation. This provision has been included in the project's RPs. Grievances redress mechanisms (GRM) will ensure accessibility to project-affected people so as to freely pose their questions, concerns and problems. The procedures will ensure both recording and processing of grievances and documenting all official responses undertaking and coordinated actions among the official agencies responsible for resettlement implementation. The project- affected people will be provided with information on the authority, and competence of project Page 8 of 10 officials in charge of solving project complaints on land, assets acquisition, physical relocation and income restoration. The project will ensure that the personal that have primary contact with project affected persons are familiar with the participatory methods and support ongoing consultations Public Disclosure Copy during project implementation. The RP describes the procedures and responsibility of related agencies in receiving, redressing and recording all grievances and complaints from the DPs. The GRM will be available for all kinds of complaints or queries caused by the project. Linked projects, during project preparation a thorough screening of potentially linked projects was conducted and due diligence reviews were carried out accordingly. Specifically, the resettlement sites of Hoa Hiep 3 and about 1,400 m2 of 50-meter extension in one side of Nguyen Tat Thanh road, which will be used for the DPs relocation of the first RP, were considered as linked projects. Consequently, the first RP which included due diligence review also comprises the monitoring arrangements for the linked activities. For the second RP, the screening showed that a drainage canal of 136m long which will be directly connected with the one to be built under SCDP appeared to be linked to the SCDP. The RP has included a due diligence review of the past land acquisition and livelihood restoration of DPs will be included in the project monitoring system. Implementation arrangements, the PMU, in collaboration and support of the City-related agencies, will assume the overall responsibility for implementation of the first and second RPs. The PMU has had experience with implementing two Bank-funded projects, involving Bank's social safeguards and preparation and implementation of RPs. The City People's Committee will be responsible for providing the final approval for land acquisition, allocation and compensation rates. All compensation and land acquisition costs will be financed by counterpart funds. 5. Identify the key stakeholders and describe the mechanisms for consultation and disclosure on safeguard policies, with an emphasis on potentially affected people. The Project's key stakeholders are Da Nang PMU, Da Nang People's Committees, Da Nang DoT, Da Nang DoC, the project's supervision and monitoring consultants, design engineers, and contractors, and local communities living in the project areas—especially households directly impacted by the project activities. Consultations with relevant stakeholders, especially affected groups and local NGOs (including Women's Union, Farmers' Union, Fatherland Front, Youth Public Disclosure Copy Union and Veterans' Organization) during the preparation of safeguards instruments such as EIA/ EMP and SA, RP have been conducted to comply with World Bank policy requirements. Information on the project's objective, potential impacts, and relevant features of compensation and resettlement policy frameworks, were widely disseminated. A similar participatory approach will be pursued during project implementation to ensure project effective implementation. B. Disclosure Requirements Environmental Assessment/Audit/Management Plan/Other Date of receipt by the Bank 10-Oct-2012 Date of submission to InfoShop 18-Oct-2012 For category A projects, date of distributing the Executive Summary of the EA to the Executive Directors "In country" Disclosure Vietnam 12-Oct-2012 Comments: at Vietnam Development Information Center Resettlement Action Plan/Framework/Policy Process Date of receipt by the Bank 10-Oct-2012 Date of submission to InfoShop 18-Oct-2012 Page 9 of 10 "In country" Disclosure Vietnam 12-Oct-2012 Comments: at Vietnam Development Information Center Public Disclosure Copy If the project triggers the Pest Management and/or Physical Cultural Resources policies, the respective issues are to be addressed and disclosed as part of the Environmental Assessment/ Audit/or EMP. If in-country disclosure of any of the above documents is not expected, please explain why: C. Compliance Monitoring Indicators at the Corporate Level OP/BP/GP 4.01 - Environment Assessment Are the cost and the accountabilities for the EMP incorporated Yes [ ] No [ ] NA [ ] in the credit/loan? OP/BP 4.11 - Physical Cultural Resources Does the credit/loan incorporate mechanisms to mitigate the Yes [ ] No [ ] NA [ ] potential adverse impacts on cultural property? OP/BP 4.12 - Involuntary Resettlement If yes, then did the Regional unit responsible for safeguards or Yes [ ] No [ ] NA [ ] Sector Manager review the plan? The World Bank Policy on Disclosure of Information Have relevant safeguard policies documents been sent to the Yes [ ] No [ ] NA [ ] World Bank's Infoshop? Have relevant documents been disclosed in-country in a public Yes [ ] No [ ] NA [ ] place in a form and language that are understandable and accessible to project-affected groups and local NGOs? Public Disclosure Copy All Safeguard Policies Have satisfactory calendar, budget and clear institutional Yes [ ] No [ ] NA [ ] responsibilities been prepared for the implementation of measures related to safeguard policies? Have costs related to safeguard policy measures been included Yes [ ] No [ ] NA [ ] in the project cost? Does the Monitoring and Evaluation system of the project Yes [ ] No [ ] NA [ ] include the monitoring of safeguard impacts and measures related to safeguard policies? Have satisfactory implementation arrangements been agreed Yes [ ] No [ ] NA [ ] with the borrower and the same been adequately reflected in the project legal documents? III. APPROVALS Task Team Leader: Cuong Duc Dang Approved By Sector Manager: Name: Jennifer J. Sara (SM) Date: 22-Feb-2013 Page 10 of 10