* c t us R g /o - //v c* mat o The World Bank FOR OMCAL USE ONY Rt No. P-6033-IN IMEOR&UDUIl AND RECOM10MTION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE INTERTIORAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATIlON TO THE EXECTIVE DIRECTORS ON -A PROPOSED CREDIT OF SDR 39.5 MILLION TO IDIA FOR AN UTTAR PRADESH SODIC LANDS R AON PROJECT NAY 13, 1993 M . C1-l '1 iOI H E ;u,pYI- Piepcrtrf N,,. - E;;3 IN Typ: ( :F i ati F 1J?TArl PRADA½,H S(OPIC: LANDS Ai t.h C'-: ; E TH, A. EXt .: 43 - s )kocq- , .:3 [v .',K}/.s.-' rDerp.. :k,-A,.A Ths docuinet has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only In t d performae of their official duties. Its contents may Dot othrwise be diosed without World Bank authorization. US$1.00 RS. 291 WEIQHTS AND MEASURES The metric system is used throughout the report. FISCAL YEAR GOI, GOUP: April 1 - March 31 ACRONYMS CPM Computerized ProAect Management DPCC District Project Coordinating Committee DOA Department of Agriculture GDP Gross Domestic Product GOI Government of India GOUP Government of Uttar Pradesh IIM Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow LDC Land Development Corporation NGO Non-Governmental Organization PMC Project Management Committee RSAC Remote Sensing Application Center RSIC Reclamation Site Implementation Committee SAR Staff Appraisal Report SAU State Agriculture University SSC State Steering Committee UP Uttar Pradesh UPCAR UP Council for Agricultural Research 1 Exchange rate at the time of appraisal during February 1993. FOR OMCIAL USE ONLY INDA UTTAR PRADESH SODIC LANDS RECLAMATION PROJECT CREDIT anD PRJECT SUMMARX AxorrewA.z India, Acting by its President Rzarut.etilng Agenny: Government of Uttar Pradesh AMQUfnt IDA Credit: SDR 39.5 million (US$54.7 million equivalent) Terms: IDA Credit: Standard, with 35 years maturity. On-lending Terms! GOI would make Credit proceeds available to the State of Uttar Pradesh as part of a central assistance to the states for development projects under prevailing terms and conditions. GOI would assume the foreign exchange risk. Total (USS million) Financing Plan! The State of Uttar Pradesh 13.1 Beneficiaries 12.4 IDA (SDR 39.5 million) 54.7 Total 80.2 Economic Rate of Return: 23% Staff Appraisal Report: 11715-IN Maps: IBRD Nos. 24700 and 24701 This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS ON THE PROPOSED CREDIT TO INDIA FOR THE UTTAR PRADESH SODIC LANDS RECLAMATION PROJECT 1. The following memorandum and recommendation on the proposed Development Credit of SDR 39.5 million (US$54.7 million equivalent) to India is submitted for approval. The IDA Credit would be on standard terms, with 35 years maturity, to help finance the Uttar Pradesh Sodic Lands Reclamation Project. 2. Zackgroiad. Uttar Pradesh (UP) is one of the largest states in India as it has a population of about 139 million (17% of the national total), of whom 80% live in rural areas. The State occupies 0.3 million km2, which is 9.2% of the total country area. The cultivated areas in the state total about 28 million hectares (ha), which are spread over ten agro-ecological zones. The State's economy is dominated by agriculture which generates about 42% of the State's income, employing about 78% of the total work force. About two- thirds of all farm holdings are less than 1.0 ha, with a larqe proportion of owners and dependent laborers living below the poverty line. Agricultural production in the State has been dominated by traditional food crops, particularly wheat, rice, and legumes. Through the mid-60s, major contributors to growth were expansion in cultivated areas, and increased productivity in irrigated areas. However, in the late 1960s through the 1970s, the agricultural scene changed significantly with increases in production of most crops coming from rising yields. This, especially for rice and wheat, was largely due to the introduction of high yielding varieties and accelerated development of private tubewells. The areas under other cereal crops, such as maize and barley, declined due to decreasing profitability. Lucrative cash crops, mainly sugarcane and oilseeds, performed well during this period, growing at 4% to 5% per annum (p.a.). Potato production maintained its earlier momentum, growing at 9.5% p.a. In recent years, however, the rate of growth of agriculture has declined while the population has continued to increase at about 2.3% p.a. 3. In UP, as is the case in many other States in India, a significant proportion of potentially productive land is either non-productive or producing below its potential, owing to physical constraints such as soil erosion, overgrazing, accumulation of toxic salts and waterlogging. In India the salt-affected lands (commonly termed 'usar' land) cover about 8 million ha (about 5% of total cultivated area) and pose an increasing problem, especially in irrigated areas. In UP there are about 1.25 m ha of barren and a further estimated 1.25 m ha of low-yielding single or double cropped salt-affected lands, covering about 10% of the net cultivated area. This problem is especially severe in 22 districts in the southern half of the State. The IBRD Map No. 24701 shows the distribution of such lands in the State. 4. Over the years, GOUP/GOI have initiated several schemes to assist the rural poor. These have included allotment of cultivable salt-affected land to landless laborers and public works programs. However, due to poverty and social constraints, the allottees have been unable to bring these lands back to full production. Consequently, over the years many Central and State government sponsored reclamation schemes were launched which by the end of 1989 had resulted in the rehabilitation of about 157,000 ha in UP. A survey of previous schemes shows that, in general, the reclamation work resulted in expansion of cultivated area, increased use of fertilizers, 2 improved seeds and improved productivity. In addition to the public sector agencies, a grassroots .NGO (Sarvodya Ashram) with funding from an intermediary NGO, the Society for Promotion of Wasteland Development (SPWD), has assisted in the reclamation of about 1,000 ha in blocks of about 20 ha each. This program has successfully motivated and trained farmers to enlarge reclaimed areas through group efforts. Sodic lands have also been successfully reclaimed in Haryana and Punjab. In contrast to UP, however, most of the areas in these two states belonged to relatively large farmers, with good resource bases for whom reclamation was a way of expanding their farm size. Therefore, the challenge in UP is to develop models which would enable resource-poor small and marginal farmers to develop these lands in a cost effective manner. 5. Bank Su rtedW Projects. The Benk has been supporting agriculture in India since the early 1950s. To date, 130 agricultural projects have received US$10.2 billion equiva'ent IBRD/IDA financing (81% IDA and 19% Bank), with irrigation projects dominating the portfolio. Other projects have been for: agricultural support s rvices (credit, research and extension); commercial agriculture (seeds, fisheries and agro-industry); forestry, watershed and resource conservation; livestock development; and drought assistance. In UP, 14 Bank assisted projects have been completed and 11 are ongoing. Seven of these projects were exclusively for UP and the rest involved other Indian states. The basic thrust of Bank involvement in Indian agriculture has been to: (a) increase the area i;:rigated and improve water use efficiency; (b) improve lending capability of institutions; (c) increase production of high value products, such as seeds, fish and silk; (d) improve storage, processing and other agricultural marketing facilities; (e) strengthen the research and extension services; and (f) improve the management systems affecting rainfed agriculture. The Bank has not undertaken any direct investment in land reclamation activities in India in the past. 6. ntation Perf6smane and asons Learnt. Many agricultural projects in India have suffered from implementation problems, resulting in delays in disbursements and completion. Implementation performance of projects in UP has been mixed. Common problems are: delays in project mobilization and procurement; poor quality irrigation and civil works; institutional weaknesses; insufficient local funding; poor preparation and inadequate attantion to social issues. The main lessons to be learned from the Bank and government experiences in UP are that: (a) the institutional arrangements and planning process must be clearly established to ensure effective coordination and timely implementation; (b) the availability of funding should be reviewed at regular intervals to ensure that adequate funding is provided in a timely fashion; (c) monitoring and evaluation should be given a higher priority with flexibility in project design to enable introduction of corrective actions as required; (d) the project design should pay adequate attention to social issues and beneficiary participation, if appropriate with NGO support; (e) technology packages being provided should be regularly updated with appropriately researched extension support; and (f) private sector participation should be encouraged wherever feasible. These lessons are central to the design of the proposed project. 7. Country AsisRtan6. Strategy and Rationale for IDA inmvo1vint. One of the main emphases of the Bank's Country Assistance Strategy is to support Government's development policies that impact on poverty, which 3 remains India's most serious problem. The focus is on efficient public and private resource allocation through adjustment reform measures and capacity- building. The basic strategy for a.gricultural grow*hc which under India's constiturior. is a State matter, is to strengthen agricultural, irrigation ana forestry programs at the state level. The main vehicles for the Bank group's intervention include: (a) reform of Centra' and State government policies that restrict incentives and distort trade; (b) increase the efficiency of public investment and promote greater private patticipation which has stagnated due to the complimentarities between public and private investment and poor performance of the rural credit system; (c) strengthen the programs wh4ch generate and disseminate appropriate technologies; and (d) improve the management of land and water resources through forestry programs and enhanced performance of the irrigation infrastructure with emphasis on participatory management. The proposed project fits well within this framework. Systematic reclamation of sodic lands through sound land and water management planning is increasingly important in UP due to deterioration of the environment and natural resources resulting from growing population pressures. IDA's involvement would help ensure that lessons drawn from previous projects and NGO pilot efforts are appropriately integrated into the sector's future development, and that experiences from other countries are brought to UP's participatory land reclamation efforts. In particular, IDA's continued participation would lead to the introduction of improved management systems for identification, planning and monitoring of reclamation work. It would enable development and dissemination of sustainable production technologies, and allow strengthening of institutions involved in the reclamation work. 8. Projent Objectives. The objectives of the project are to: (a) develop concomitant moiels for environmental protection and improved agricultural production through large scale reclamation of sodic lands; (b) strengthen local institutions to enable effective management of such programs with strong beneficiary participation and NGO support; and (c) contribute towards poverty alleviation of families managing sodic lands. 9. Project lescription. The proposed project is part of a long-term program to improve agricultural productivity in areas with a high concentration of sodic lands. The project would build on successful past experience and establish models which could be replicated on a much larger scale. These would emphasize beneficiary participation in the management of key activities. The project design also allows flexibility to introduce changes based on the independent monitoring of implementation experience. The project would be limited to the reclamation of about 45,000 ha over a seven year period in ten districts (IBRD Map No. 24700). Out of this about 39,000 ha would be devoted to production systems based on rice and wheat cropping and 3000 ha to salt tolerant horticultural crops. A further 3000 ha would be on community land, devoted to tree cultivation for fuel and fodder. The key components of the project would include: i) Land Reclamation (US$60 M; 81% of base costs) through provision of (a) effective drainage netcworks; (b) levelling and bunding of land to retain available rainfall and irrigation water to promote leaching of salts and crop growth; (c) application of gypsum or pyrite for alkalinity reduction in the surface 15 cm.; (d) irrigation development; and (e) the use of a rice/wheat/green manure (Sesbania) cropping system and establishment of salt 4 tolerant fruit and tree crops, singly or in combination. The investment element covers land development activities such as establishment of drainage networks, amelioration *f soil's chemical properties and drilling of boreholes. The support being provided as a grant focuses on ensuring successful implementation of different steps in the reclamation process and stabilization of crop yields through progressive improvement in growing conditions. These include an assured water supply through a 50% contribution towards the purchase of pumpsets and provision of farmyard manure and seeds. For agricultural crops, production support (fertilizers) would be provided for the first four seasons. For horticultural activities, support would cover tree establishment and maintenance until first fruiting. Farmers would contribute towards the cost of pumpsets and pay full operation and maintenance costs. They would also contribute their labor to on-farm development work. Due to the pilot nature of the forestry model on community land, which would directly benefit women's groups, these activities would be initially undertaken on a grant basis with groups contributing labor. Later attempts would be made to introduce informal savings schemes to enable the groups to finance input costs. wii IntAaztntional DeAxwena1it (US$6.9 M; 9% of base costs) comprising strengthening of (a) the managerial and administrative capacity of UPLDC, the main implementing agency; (b) Remote Sensing Application Center (RSAC) that is responsible for site identification and selection, planning and monitoring ef environmental improvements due to reclamation; (c) participation of NGOs, training of field staff, grassroots NGos and farmers; and formation of farmer groups to encourage beneficiary participation. An NGO would also assist in improving women's farming operations and strengthening their role in local decision making bodies; iii) ltural Da1ol nt- and Tgehnnay seminatinn (US$4.0 M; 5% of base costs) consisting of demonstration of reclamation models for the production of crops, fruit trees and forestry and fodder species on sodic lands; nursery development for fruit tree seedlings production; and extension support involving motivational campaigns, production of publicity material, use of mass communication techniques; and iv) laMat-orn Taehnn1= t and Rp.aial Atudi^n (US$3.4 M; 5% of base costs) consisting of adaptive research to improve existing technology, diversification of cropping systems and development of systems for preventing further expansion of sodicity. Two special studies to improve the effectiveness of drainage systems and efficiency of shallow tubewells would also be undertaken. 10. Pr4ojgwt !mplmntatin. The coordination of the project implementation would be carried out by the UP Land Development Corporation (LDC). In preparation for implementation of the proposed project, GOUP has reorganized and strengthened LDC by recruiting experienced technical staff, appointing a full time Managing Director and reorganizing Board membership to 5 include senior level representatives for the relevant GOUP departments, State Agricultural University and NGOs. In addition, LDC has entered into contractual arrangements with the Remote Sensing Application Center (RSAC); Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow (IIM) and grassroots and intermediary NGOs to assist in the planning, monitoring and evaluation of reclamation program, and formation of farmer groups. The project cost is estimated at US$80.2 million equivalent, with a foreign exchange component of US$14.4 million equivalent (18%) and taxes and duties estimated at about US$8.4 million equivalent. IDA would finance SDR 39.5 million (US$54.7 million equivalent, 100% of the foreign exchange and 68% of the total). Retroactive financing is provided up to an amount of SDR 3.6 million (USS5 million equivalent) for project expenditures incurred from September 1992 to accelerate the project implementation, especially strengthening of LDC and support to be provided by IIM, RSAC and NGOs in beneficiary group formation. A breakdown of the project costs and the financing plan are in schedule A. Amounts and methods of procurement and disbursement and the disbursement schedules are shown in Schedule B. Project completion date is SeptembKar 0, 2000 and the closing date is March 31, 2001. A timetable of key project processing events and the status of Bank Group operations in India are given in Schedules C and D, respectively. Two maps showing the distribution of salt- affected lands in UP and the project areas are also attached. The Staff Appraisal Report No. 11715-IN of May 10, 1993 is being distributed separately. II. Agreed Attinn. The main assurances obtained from GOUP during negotiations are summarized as follows: (a) that NGOs would be selected in accordance with criteria agreed with rDA and their support would be maintained throughout the project period; (b) that: (i) the Agriculture Production Commissioner would continue to be the Chairman of the Board of LDC for the duration of the project; (ii) the staff requirements of LDC would be met in accordance with the criteria agreed with IDA; (c) that GOUP/LDC would observe the provisions of each of the Memorandum of Understandings between LDC-IDM and LWC-RSAC for implementation and monitoring support under the project: (d) that by December 31 each year starting in 1994 LDC would provide to IDA for review and comments a copy of the approved Annual Action Plan for the following year; (e) that: (i) the reclamation site identification, selection and planning would be undertaken in accordance with the criteria agreed with IDA; and (ii) from April 1, 1998, GOt? would provide the contributions for the maintenance of the drainage system which would be accounted for in the annual budget of the Irrigation Department: (f) technical assistance staff required for special studies would be appointed no later than September 30, 1994 in accordance with IDA guidelines; (g) by September 30, 1994 LDC would appoint an NGO or other suitably qualified agency to undertake an independent assessment of participatory management program under the project; (h) that by September 30, 1997, GOI and State Government, jointly with IDA would undertake a mid-term review of project program and implement its recommendations. 12. Evironmental Tmnae±. The development of diversified cropping systems to restore sodic lands to their full production potential would address problems associated with the deteriorated environment of the salt- affected lands. It would stabilize soil surfaces now subject to wind erosion and reduce levels of airborne salt laden particulates during the dry season. The establishment of systems for fuel wood production on community land would provide the means of reducing degradation of public wooded areas used for the collection of these commodities. Upgrading and/or establishment of drainage 6 networks would minimize continued degradation of land due to the accumulation of salts over land within the catchment area of the drainage network. Changes in the soil quality and land use patterns would be monitored through remote sensing and ground surveys. Ground or surface water quality is not expected to be adversely affected as the irrigation water would be impounded in the fields (for leaching and crop growth) and any salt present in drainage water would be diluted by the large volume of monsoon rainwater. Based on data collected by the Groundwater Department over many years it is concluded that the increased abstraction of water through the limited numbers of new shallow tubewells proposed under the project would have no measurable affect on the quantity of available groundwater reserves. Nonetheless, to develop a better understanding, the groundwater and surface waters would be monitored throughout implementation and beyond project completion with respect to quality and dynamics of the systems. An environmental management and monitoring plan has been developed by GOUP and agreed with IDA. 13. InRtitut{onal TmpRot. The project would foster a major change in the approach to land reclamation from a 'top down' activity to cooperation with beneficiaries, involving them in a number of decisions. The State is committed to thias approach, and accepts this as the ntost sustainable way of maintaining reclaimed are.as in full production. An added institutional feature is the close coordination of all participating agencies in the reclamation work. The projent would also establish capacity for systematic and comprehensive monitoring of environmental impacts, an activity not undertaken in the State before. 14. Tmact oni Women. Women contribute considerably to on-farm activities and are also the main collectors of fodder and fuel wood from community land or other sources. The proposed forestry model would enhance availability of forest products which women collect to provide household subsistence and secondary income. Proposed mobilization of women's groups with the help of NGOs for training, thrift and credit, as well as other related activities, would ensure that they benefit from project activities. Participation would be further supported by training voluntary Mahila Mitra Kisans (women 'contact' farmers) to help with the project, and an agreement with GOUP/DOA that, wherever possible, women would be integrated with other outgoing development programs. 15. BanafitA. The proposed project would have both non-monetary and monetary benefits. First, the continued degradation of the environment would be arrested through reclamation of sodic areas and improvements in the soil quality over the total catchment area served by the drainage network to be established under the project. Second, new environmentally sustainable technologies would be developed for the management of problem soils. Third, the project would strengthen the participating institutions and develop operational models for effective beneflciary participation while increasing cooperation between many government departments, beneficiaries and NGOs. The lessons from this experience would have wide applicability in a number of different operations in the country. Fourth, approximately 80,000 small and marginal farm families would directly benefit from project activities. Restoration of sodic lands to high productivity would create rural employment opportunities and increase crop production, which would help to alleviate poverty in the project area. For many participating farm families, this would be a first time opportunity to own a small parcel of productive and potentially valuable land. 7 16. Rlsks. There are three main risks to the project. The first risk relates to the effective coordination of various reclamation activities which need to be planned and undertaken in a timely manner. To minimize this risk, Annual Action Plans using the CPM system would be finalized at least 3 months prior to the beginning of each year's work program. In addition, support from agencies with specialized expertise and clearly defined responsibilities would ensure timely completion of agreed actions. A Project Management Committee, specifically constituted to maximize inter-departmental cooperation, would help to avoid delays by expediting actions taken by participating GOUP departments. The second risk relates to the ability to form and sustain farmer groups to participate in several activities, including group credit for pumpsets. To ensure fo:mation of successful groups, NGOs with proven experience in participatory management are working with LDC to organize motivational campaigns and run training sessions for grassroots NGOs, LDC staff and farmers. In addition, the project design has flexibility to adjust reclamation targets in response to farmer demand. They would also assist in promoting benefits of the reclamation program and assisting groups, especially with water sharing arrangements. The third risk concerns the ability of farmers to effectively adopt the fL. reclamation package. This risk would be minimized through the introduction of models that maintain and improve farmers income early in the project's life. In addition, an intensive deme,.istration program of reclanation package and farmer training would encourage adoption of the proposed technology. Furthermore, limiting of the reclamation program to about 45,000 ha over a seven year period would allow enough time to train farmers and, if required, amend the project design based on implementation experience. 17. Recomndat4n. I am satisfied that the proposed credit would comply with the Articles of Agreement of the Association and recommend that the Executive Directors approve the proposed credit. Lewis T. Preston President Attachments Washington, DC May 13, 1993 8 ~~~~~~S:chedule A 8 Page 1 of 1 INDI: AQRTCULTURAL DEVELPMENT PROJECT - UTTAR PRADESH ESTIMATED PROJECT cOSTS LgQal Forin T^otal Local FoeigQ Tetal Rs million US$ million A. Land Reclamation 1486.4 270.3 1756.6 50.7 9.2 60.0 B. Institutional Development*/ i. Land Development Corp. 137.2 3.0 140.2 4.7 0.1 4.8 ii.Remote Sensing Appl.Center 32.1 26.4 58.5 1.1 0.9 2.0 iii.Non-Govt Organizations 4.0 - 4.0 0.1 - 0.1 Subtotal 173.3 29.4 202.7 5.9 1.0 6.9 C. Agricultural Development 6 Extension Support 77.5 40.9 118.4 2.6 1.4 4.0 D. Technology Development & Special Studies i. Adaptive Research 18.6 0.0 18.6 0.6 0.0 0.6 ii.Special Studies 81.5 0.0 81.5 2.8 0.0 2.8 Subtotal 100.1 0.0 100.1 3.4 0.0 3.4 Total Baseline Costs 1837.2 340.6 2177.8 62.7 11.6 74.3 Physical Contingencies 168.6 33.0 201.6 5.8 1.1 6.9 Price Contingencies 558.1 199.6 757.7 -2.7 1.7 -1.0 TotAL Project Cost 2563.9 573-1 1137.1 65.8 144A IQ.Z Financing Plan: Local Foreign Total US$ million GOUP 13.1 ---- 13.1 Beneficiaries 10.6 1.8 12.4 IDA A2J 1 12.46 5A.12 Total 65.8 14.4 80.2 */ The cost of IIM Contract is included under the Land Development Corporation component. 9 Page 1 of 2 INDIA A(R:IULItBAL DEVELOPMENT PRQJECT - UTTAR PRADESH PROCUREMENT ARRANGEMEHNTS =N D2ISB3URSEMENTS Procurement Method Non-Bank Total PROJCT ELMTB Others Finannd Cost -------------- US $ Million --------- 1. Land Acquisition 1.38 1.38 2. Civil Works a/ 11.23 5.35 16.58 (9.*8) (4.78) (14.76) 3. Commodities b/ 18.27 4.82 1.0 3.29 26.48 (15.27) (3.36) (0.8) (19.44) 4. Materials & Equipment 0.54 3.40 8.08 9.78 21.80 (0.48) (2.89) (6.1) (9.37) 5. Vehicles 0.79 0.79 (0.61) (0.61) 6. Consultants, Contracts and Training 4.69 4.69 (4.27) (4.27) 8. Incremental staff & 8.35 8.35 operating costs (6.15) (6.15) TOTAL 18.82 18.54 28.38 14.46 80.2 (15.75) (16.14) (22.81) (54.7) Note: Siigures in parentheses are the respective amounts to be financed by IDA a/ Includes on-farm development works (US$2.54 million). b/ Includes pyrite and gypsum (US$15.1 million) and fertilizers, seed, and crop protection chemicals (US$7.8 million). ICB: International Competitive Bidding; LCB - Local Competitive Bik ng others: Local shopping, direct contracting, force account and consultant recruitment. 10 Schpdula B Page 2 of 2 Ca agrg ~finAt itg (US$ M) Civil Works 10.0 90% (13.9) Commodities/ 19.8 100% of foreign expenditures, 100% of Goods/Equipment (27.4) local expenditures (ex-factory costs), Vehicles and 80% of local expenditures for other items procured locally Supervision 3.3 100% Costs (4.5) (3000 Rs/ha for management and supervision of land reclamation activities) Consultancies 2.7 Services and (3.8) 100% Training Operating Costs 0.8 90% of expenditures incurred during 1992 (1.1) and 1993, 7S% of expenditures incurred during 1994 and 1995 and 60% of expenditures incurred thereafter Unallocated 2.9 (4.0) IQA Fisc~al Year (USS million) 22 2!1 Ui X 21 la 2 2,0QQ9 Annual 3.3 6.6 7.6 9.8 11.0 9.8 4.4 2.2 Cumulative 3.3 9.9 17.5 27.3 38.3 48.1 52.5 54.7 Page 1 of 1 UT= PRADESH SODIC LANDS RECLaMTION PROJECT Timetable of Key Project PErocessing Events (a) Time taken to prepare the project: 24 months (b) Prepared by: GOUP and local consultants with Bank assistance (c) First Bank mission: January, 1990 (d) Appraisal Mission Departure: January, 1993 (e) Negotiations: April, 1993 (f) Planned date of Effectiveness: September, 1993 12 SC-EIDULE 0 PAGE 1 of S TE STATUS O lAM GROUP OPUATIOMS is INDIA A. S?AXGN OF LOANS AM IDA CREDITS (As of Naach 31, 1993) US4 MllionL (net of cancellatLons) Loan or Piscal Yeer ---------------------------------- Credit So.of Appr Puspoe IS9D D 11 Undisbursed 21 I/ 96 Laont/ 7215.4 1/ 162 Credits fUllY lsbur2ed/cancelled 12314.5 1356-ZN 1983 Upper Iudtavati Hydro Power - 170.00 18.29 2393-IN 1984 Dudhlohua Coal 109.00 - 16.50 2442-IN 1984 PFrakka 11 Thermal Power 278.80 - 38.82 1496-DN 1984 Cujarat Medium Irrigation - 156.30 31.49 SF-20-IN 1984 ndirs S rovar Drdroelectric - 13.84 17.35 2416-ZN 1984 Indlra Sarovar Hydroelectric 17.43 - 8.53 2415-NI 1984 Madhya Pradesh Fertilize: 167.10 - 0.94 2387-IN 1984 Shava Sheva Port 250.00 - 19.26 SF-16-IN 1984 Porlyr Vali L Ir Irrigation - 17.50 7.33 1426-ZN 1984 Population III - 70.00 1.06 2417-ZN 1984 Rallways Rlectnifiaction 279.20 - 12.67 1424-1N 1984 Rainfed Are". Watershed Dev. 25.52 10.91 14:4-ZN 1984 Tamil Nedu Water Supply - 56.50 19.04 SY- .2-IN 1984 Tamll Nadu Water Supply - 36.50 10.93 148:--IN 1984 Upper Gan"a Irrigatlin - 105.43 28.94 1544-1N 1985 Bombay Urban Development - 100.92 25.75 2544-IN 1985 Chandrapur Thermal Power 280.00 - 87.18 1613-IN 1985 lndira Saowavr Hydroelectric - 13.20 17.21 2498-ZN 1985 Jbaria Coking Coal 57.70 - 2.42 2582-ZN 1985 Moral Powar 176.00 - 124.22 1514-IN 1985 Kerala Soclal Forestry - 27.12 3.14 2497-N 1985 Namzrda (Gujarat) Dan and Power 200.00 - 165.54 1523-ZN 195 National Agric. Extonsion I - 33.02 0.42 2534-ZN 1985 National Nlhways 133.00 - 40.36 1611-IN 1985 National Social Forestry - 154.09 0.11 2555-rN 1985 RLand Pover TransaiseLon 202.00 - 8.81 1569-ZN 1985 Second National A4ricultural Ext. - 45.39 18.36 1665-ZN 1986 Andhra Pradesb h Irrigation - 140.00 103.84 2662-IN 1986 Andbra Pradesh II Irrigation 41.00 - 41.00 2660-IN 1986 Cement Industry 165.00 - 35.71 2674-ZN 1986 CombLned Cycle Power 485.00 - 15.25 2730-IN 1986 Cooperative Yertiliser 111.06 - 7.58 1643-ZN 1986 CGujarat Urban - 50.34 20.85 2661-IN 1986 ICICI - Cement Industry 35.00 - 10.92 1622-ZN 1986 lAnal Water Supply and Sanitation - 21.80 7.71 162i-IN 1986 Mabarashtra Composite Irrigation - 160.00 169.40 1631-ZN 1986 Natlonal Agricultural Research 11 - 59.88 25.02 1619-IN 1986 West Bengal inor Irrigation - 69.17 63.25 1623-ZN 1986 West Bengal Population - 45.85 11.23 1737-IN 1987 BDbar Tubewells - 22.29 7.69 1730-IN 1987 Bombay gater Supply & Sewevrag III - 145.00 82.44 2769-ZN 1987 Bombay Water Supply & Seerage II2 40.00 - 40.00 2796-IN 1987 Coal XinALg * Quality Improvem nt 340.00 - 96.59 1757-ZN 1987 Gujarat Rural Poads - 119.60 81.70 2827-ZN 1987 Earnataka Power 260.00 - 180.52 2846-ZN 1987 Madras Water Supply 53.00 - 32.97 1754-ZN 1987 National AgrLc. Extension III - 70.18 31.35 2844-ZN 1987 National Capital Power 425.00 - 155.21 1770-IN 1987 Natioaml Water Management - 114.00 62.36 2785-ZN 1987 OLI India Petroleum 140.00 - 15.08 13 SC815WLZ D PCGE 2 of S 15S8 llionle (nt ea ncllaioa) Loan or Fiscal Year (Mt of oaa"llAtLo-) CcGLt lle.ef 4pr Pupez DIID IDA 11 Dtdiabursd 2I 2845-ZR 1967 aldohr SThnl $57.00 - 243.06 2613-1N 1987 S lecoommui"at.ona zt 108.00 - 8.63 1780-ZR 1987 Uttr Pdsh urban De _opment - 120.95 in9-ZR 98s6 lomua & Mas platio - 57.00 16.54 2921-ZN 196 Indus. Fn. & Tek. Amer. 30.00 - 50.70 293S-1N 19J8 aataka Power U 220.00 - 178.31 1859-Zn 1968 Ratioa Dairy Z - 160.00 0.49 2693-ZR 1988 Rational Dairy UZ 200.00 - 200.00 2935-ZR 1988 Railvay Modernization SS2 270.00 - 54.15 1923-IN 1968 Tamil Nadu Urban Dev. - 209.69 140.93 3093-ZR 1989 ElectronLis ZvdAutry Dev. 6.00 - 7.50 3056-ZR 1969 EUport Developmnt 120.00 - 37.27 3094-ZN 1989 ZCZCZ - Nlectrancs Zud. Dv. 101.00 - 41.12 3059-ZR 1969 ICICZ - Export D.velopn ut 175.00 - 83.94 3095-ZR 1969 2DB2 - Slectroascs ld. D3v. 101.00 - 75.05 3090-ZR 1989 Maharashtra Plwer 354.00 - 312.82 3024-ZR 1989 Natbpa Jbak L Poer 465.00 - 440.29 1952-ZR 1989 Rational Seds Y22 - 150.00 02.78 3022-ZR 1969 Rational Serculture 147.00 102.19 2057-ZR 1989 at'l. Familr Welfare True. - 113.30 94.03 3044-ZR 1989 Petroleum Transport 50.00 - 15.00 2994-2N 1989 States Read 170.00 - 170.00 1959-ZR 1989 States Reads - 80.00 23.94 2010-ZR 1989 upper Krishna IrriSgation Z - 160.00 99.71 3050-IR 1969 Upper Krishba Irrigation SS 85.00 - 6.00 2008-ZR 1989 Vocatienal TraLuLng - 211.02 104.60 3198-1R 1990 Ce_nt Zndustry Restruactur1ng 300.00 - 213.26 2115-ZR 1990 Hyderabad Water supply - 79.90 50.31 2064-ZR 1"0 Industrial Technology Development - 55.00 50.25 3119-ZN 1990 IndustrLal echnology Developmet 145.00 - 98.69 3237-ZR 1990 Northern Region Transmiasio 485.00 - 449.97 22.3-ZR 1990 Populatton Trainnsg VIS - 81.92 68.41 3239-IZ 19O PrLvate Pover Utlitie Z (tEC) 98.00 - 75.56 2070-ZR 1990 Punjab IrrigationjoDra1ase - 145.28 121.23 2158-ZR 1990 Tamil NRdi integrated nutrition SI - 86.15 77.04 2130-ZR 1990 Toehniian Education, I - 210.74 169.36 2100-1N 1990 Waterbed Develonat (1111) - 75.00 6S.95 2131-ZR 1990 atershd Dewelopnt (Plains) - 55.00 52.62 3260-ZR 1991 A.P. Cy"lne mrgsey Reconstruction 40.00 - 40.00 2179-Z1 1991 A.P. Cyclone Emerenc Recontruction - 170.00 9.20 2241-ZN 1991 Dam safety - 130.00 122." 3325-ZR 1991 Dm Safety 23.00 - 23.00 3364-IZ 1991 Gas larig uct 450.00 - 282.16 2173-ZR 1991 SCDS I (Oriss & Andhra Pradesh) - 96.00 63.45 3334-Z1 1991 Industrlal Pollutont Contreo 124.00 - 107.06 2252-ZN 1991 Industrial Pollution Control - 31.60 30.48 2234-IZ 1991 Mhaxasbtr Rwrl Water Supply - 109.90 ".51 3259-ZR 1991 Petrochemicals - 233.00 - 156.74 3258-ZN 1991 Petr al US 12.00 - 11.00 3344-ZR 1991 Private Pover Utilities SS (BSES) 200.00 - 141.61 2215-ZR 1991 Tamil adu Agriulturl Developmet - 92.80 70.86 3300-ZR 1991 TaMl Radu Agriculturl Devlopmet 20.00 - 20.00 2223-ZN 1991 Technician Education ZZ - 307.10 27.5 2300-ZR 1992 Child Survival and Safe Mothrohod - 214.50 176.01 2394-ZN 1992 Family Welfare (Urb Slums) * - 79.00 60.09 2328-ZR 1992 Maharashtra Ferestry - 124.00 116.4U 2350-ZR 1992 National AIDS Control - 64.00 73.99 3436-ZN 1992 Pover Utilitiets Efficancy 205.00 - 250.98 3498-ZN 1992 S^ontd Iabhabtra Power * 350.00 ^ 350.00 3470-ZN 1992 Second Nattoal Elshway 153.00 - 153.00 2365-ZR 1992 Second National Rlghvay - 153.00 150.77 2329-ZN 1992 5hrUp and Flsh Culture - 8.00 83.39 2341-IN 1992 West Beagal Fooestry 34.00 28.3S 2433-ZN 1993 Agricultural Development Rajasthan - 106.00 96.45 2439-IR 1993 BLhar Plateau Development - 117.00 106.00 14 SC8ZDUL D PACZ 3 @5 5 WS lUlULon (not of cancellations) Loan or Flscal Yer ---- - _ Credtt 8N.of Appr Putpoes IBRD IDA lt Undisbused 21 2430-ZN 1993 Jbhrta nex r Control * - 12.00 U1.94 357-IN 1993 ENMC Power Geld 350.00 - 324.96 3544-3N 1993 Kenewabl. Resources Developmeat * 75.00 - 75.00 2649-N 1993 Benewable Resources Development * - 115.00 113.27 2409-ZN 1993 Rebber * - 92.00 92.17 2470-ZN 1999 Second 2ntegrated Chld Dew. s 194.00 196.5 2448-ZN 1993 Socal Safety not Sector MAdjuataet 500.00 244.17 Total 18025.7 19442.8 10500.90 of whlec baa been repaid 3793.8 966.0 Total now ountanadis 14231.9 18476.8 FAmt SoLd 133.8 of Nhich has been rop.1d 133.8 Total now bald by Bank and IDA 31 14231.88 18476.80 Total undisbursed (oxieud1n8 *) 5503.7 4078.2 It =DA Credit saouats for SDR-denom1nated Credits are expressed In torms of their US dollar quivalents, as established at the time of Credit negotiations and as subsequently presented to the Board. 21 Vadisbursed moutmt for SDR-deGQminated DDA Credits are derived as the undisbursed balance expressed In SDR equivalents (La turn derived as the difference between the originl principal expressed In SON. (based on the exchange rate as established at tbe time of Credit negotiations) and the cusulative disbursements converted to SOR equivalents at the exchange rates prevaillng at the respective dates of disbursements less cancellations expressed in SDR equivalents ceoverte to US dollar equivalents at the SDRVUS dollar exchange rate In effect on June 30, 1992. 3I PrLor to exchange adjustment. * Not yet effective. 15 SCBEDULS D PACE 4 OF 5 B. STA?D4ENT OF IFnIe IhvzSTfS (As of Xarch 31, 1993) Amout (US million) 110. elar Cormpany Loan Equit TStal 1959 Republic Forge Companr Ltd. 1.50 -- 1.50 1959-92 Xlrloskar Oil EngnLes Ltd. 0.85 -- 0.15 1960 Assam Sillmanite Ltd. 1.36 -- 1.36 1961 I.S.B. Pumps Ltd. 0.21 -- 0.21 1963-66 Preclsion Bearings India Ltd. 0.65 0.38 1.03 1964 Fort Closter Industries Ltd. 0.81 0.40 1.21 1964 LaksheL MaXhlua Works Ltd. 0.96 0.36 1.32 194-75-79190 Mahindra UgLne Steel Co. Ltd. 11.81 2.84 14.65 1967 Indian Explosives Ltd. 8.60 2.86 11.46 1961 J.ayhre. Chemials Ltd. 1.05 0.10 1.15 1969-70 Zuarl Agro-Chamicals Ltd. 15.15 3.76 18.91 197-87 Escorts LLsited 15.55 -- 15.55 1978-87191/93 Sousing Developmeut Finance Corp. 106.32 2.10 108.42 1980182187/89 Deepak Fertil15er and Petrochemicals CorporatLin Ltd. 7.50 4.23 11.73 1981-82 Nagarjun, Coated Tubes Ltd. 1.50 0.24 1.74 1981-82 p agerjua Steels Limited 2.88 0.24 3.12 1981-86-89 Tata Iron and Steel Company Ltd. 72.14 24.50 96.64 I981-90193 )ahlndra & Mahindra Ltd. 29.71 9.30 39.01 1982 Ashok Loyland Limited 28.00 -- 28.00 1982 Coromandel Fertilixers Lisited 15.88 -- 15.88 1982 The Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Ce. Ltd. 18.80 -- 18.80 1982-87 ITW Signode 2.9" 1.01 4.00 1982-87 The lndian Rayon Corp. Ltd. 14.57 -- 14.57 1983 Bharat Forge Company Ltd. 15.90 __ 15.90 1984-86 The Cbalior Rayon Silk Manufacturing (Weaving) Co. Ltd. 15.95 -- 15.95 1985 Bajaj Auto Ltd. 23.93 23.93 1985 McdL Cement 13.05 -- 13.05 1985-86190-91 India Leae Development Ltd. 8.50 0.78 9.28 3985191 Bihar Sponge 15.24 0.68 15.92 1986 Ba3J Temo Limited 30.54 -- 30.54 1986193 India Squipmeat Leasing Ltd. 5.50 0.30 5.80 1986 Larsen and Toubro Ltd. 21.78 -- 21.78 1986-87 The great Eastern Shipping Company Ltd. 8.00 13.89 21.89 1987 EUport-Import Back of India 14.34 -- 14.34 1987 Gujarat Fuesin Glass Ltd. 7.52 1.70 9.22 1987 Gujarat Narmada Valley FertiLizer 38.07 -- 38.07 1987 E-ro Eonda Motors Ltd. 7.74 _ 7.74 1987 NLndustan Notors Ltd. 39.14 -- 39.14 1987 TSh Gujarat Rural Bousing Flnance Corp. -- 0.19 0.19 1987 Winee LiLited 4.70 -- 4.70 1987-89190 Titan Watches LiLited 22.02 1.08 23.10 1988 Iwvel Transmissions Ltd. -- 1.07 1.07 1989 Abmedabad Electricity Company, Ltd. 20.83 -- 20.83 1989 UTZ Advanced Technology -- 0.20 0.20 1989-90 Keltrol Telophone Jstruments, Ltd. - 0.56 0.56 1989-92 Gujarat State Fertlizer 40.42 - 40.42 1990 JSB India Securities Fis -- 0.37 0.37 199 WAL Fuel System Ltd. - 0.63 0.63 1990-91 Tata Electric 111.88 -- 111.88 l991 AC Industries Eport Finance 0.28 -- 0.28 1991 Bombay Elestrca 68.00 68.00 1991 cesC Ltd. 22.34 -- 22.34 1991 xport Finamoe - AFDC 0.35 -3 0.55 1991 Ebrdlla Oxie end Electronics Ltd. -- 0.29 0.29 1991 Indut. Credlt S Inestment Corp. of India -- 26.60 26.60 1991/93 lfratructure Leasing a Finncal Ser*c ces 15.00 4.64 19.64 1991 ?DICI Developenat Financ Companies -- 2.05 2.05 1991 Triveli Pool Intairdril Ltd. (TPIL) -- 0.93 0.93 1991 Vru Tranport, Storage & Comnications 17.04 3.06 20.10 1992 Arvnd )ills 22.13 7.81 29.94 16 PAGE 5 01 5 Amount CWS$ dlliOn) fu1l Ye" Oopan Vn --o 1992 slock Ue-Cl- - 8.20 8.20 1"2 ZiDUS le -- 1.01 .1.01 l992 Iotak hd 0.66 - 0." 1992 iopen Dnor. 40.00 5.77 45.77 192 WKF eariuS 11.50 -- 11.50 1995 Credlteapital VF -- 0.51 0.51 1995 NmCI-DCO 3.00 0.25 3.25 ?o5AL GROSS COOMN3NT8 1024.14 134.89 1159.0s -es: Coneeltione Termln eious Exobause Adjustments, e paunts, Writ.offs ad Sales 502.42 25.97 531.39 Nov gld by ZYC 521.72 105.92 627.64 Vadisbursed 125.21 51.29 156.50 IBRD 24700 HIMACHA4 PWADFSN i£ 7 UtAR (ASH S}* AC H I N A UTTAR KASHIj { CHINA !;59 >INDIA . t r\5> l 0L f UTTAR PRADESH SODIC LANDS HARVANAtr^tT* o -ERECLAMATION PROJECT X ) sr7 °fJ a _ _ DISTRICT BOUNDARIES OnE0>zn S MORADABAD f/ - STATE OR UNION TERRiTORY BOUNDARIES r \w 1l \\s ) 0"4ml P pm INTR1IOUNDARIES Se; >= h / k@iEW Plti~~~~~~~SSGBHAIT A?/ Jlt4 1 \ AI( ;~~~~~~ ~ 18' S 'kia. 00 40 80 0 ONBHADRA GO 11*_etnd; fxrX&_f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : {' \8 2 8 MARCHA1 993 I7RD 24701 $ UltA K5Xt P \,>C H I N A ' I>"'o _ hD \ INDIA * _ t \:J 9 UTTAR PRADESH SODIC LANDS HAR ^X4NA 7 & > RECLAMATION PROJECT .' 4-N > ) -x, \ z 5 < DISTRIBUTION OF SALT-AFFECTED LANDS ALMOA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ - , $WALTFAM!C LOWD J\. r-. -," 0 oSUcr HEADQUAfr ots\_ 52j~ ...... \ -\ * i STUCAIAL N JUNO~~~~~~~~~~~~ - N~~~~~~AiIONALHIKWAYS Mteuf~ tiG~ RANAROAM tv- - DEL uwu -- DSt$ICT SOUNDMRES 4 4'.' .~~~~~ami~~~r4rA'¶.~~~~~- SW 0R UNIO TERIORY SOUJNDAj=E -' &~~~~~~ oftu.4 - - ~~~~~~~~~INTRNAIIR4 SOUJNDARIE ht>#.*e 4. ° PUISNITI\\_ N?A dIM% -r_we AVAOHYA PRADESA? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1.OU MADHYA PRAWSH ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ SSNSADA 7W w s MARCH 1993