The World Bank Peru Strengthening Sustainable Management of the Guano Islands, Isles and Capes National Reserve System Project (P129647) REPORT NO.: RES26291 DOCUMENT OF THE WORLD BANK RESTRUCTURING PAPER ON A PROPOSED PROJECT RESTRUCTURING OF PERU STRENGTHENING SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF THE GUANO ISLANDS, ISLES AND CAPES NATIONAL RESERVE SYSTEM PROJECT APPROVED ON DECEMBER 6, 2013 TO PROFONANPE ENVIRONMENT & NATURAL RESOURCES LATIN AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN Regional Vice President: Jorge Familiar Calderon Country Director: Alberto Rodriguez Senior Global Practice Director: Karin Erika Kemper Practice Manager/Manager: Raul Ivan Alfaro Pelico Task Team Leader: Gabriela Encalada Romero The World Bank Peru Strengthening Sustainable Management of the Guano Islands, Isles and Capes National Reserve System Project (P129647) ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AGRO RURAL Programa de Desarrollo Productivo Agrario Rural (Rural Agricultural Productive Development Program) CS Collaborative Sub-projects CY Calendar Year DICAPI Dirección General de Capitanías y Guardacostas (General Direction of Captaincies and Coastguards) ha Hectares ICR Implementation Completion Report IMARPE Instituto del Mar del Perú (Peruvian Sea Institute) IRD Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development) KfW Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KfW Development Bank) METT Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool MTR Mid-term Review NPA Natural Protected Area PAD Project Appraisal Document PAN III Proyecto de �reas Naturales Protegidas III (Protected Natural Areas Project III) PDO Project Development Objective PROFONANPE Fondo de Promoción de las Areas Naturales Protegidas del Perú (The Peruvian Trust Fund for Natural Parks and Protected Areas) RF Results Framework The World Bank Peru Strengthening Sustainable Management of the Guano Islands, Isles and Capes National Reserve System Project (P129647) RNSIIPG Reserva Nacional Sistema de Islas, Islotes y Puntas Guaneras (Guano Islands, Islets and Capes National Reserve System) SERNAP Servicio Nacional de �reas Naturales Protegidas por el Estado (the Member Country’s National Service of Natural Protected Areas) SMART Spatial Monitoring Reporting Tool SNIP Sistema Nacional de Inversión Pública (National System of Public Investment) TBD To be defined US$ United States Dollars The World Bank Peru Strengthening Sustainable Management of the Guano Islands, Isles and Capes National Reserve System Project (P129647) BASIC DATA Product Information Project ID Lending Instrument P129647 Investment Project Financing Original EA Category Current EA Category Partial Assessment (B) Partial Assessment (B) Approval Date Current Closing Date 06-Dec-2013 31-Mar-2019 Organizations Borrower Responsible Agency PROFONANPE SERNANP Processing (this section will be automatically removed by the system before the paper is disclosed) Form Type Based on the proposed changes this Restructuring type is Full Restructuring Paper Level 2 Decision Authority CD Decision Project Development Objective (PDO) Original PDO The Global Environmental Objective/ Project Development Objective of the project is to improve the overall management of marine andcoastal ecosystems of the Guano Islands, Islets, and Capes National Reserve System of Peru (RNSIIPG) and protect its biological diversity in pilot sites. The World Bank Peru Strengthening Sustainable Management of the Guano Islands, Isles and Capes National Reserve System Project (P129647) Summary Status of Financing Net Ln/Cr/Tf Approval Signing Effectiveness Closing Commitment Disbursed Undisbursed TF-15896 11-Feb-2014 11-Feb-2014 21-Apr-2014 31-Mar-2019 8.92 4.38 4.54 Policy Waiver(s) Does this restructuring trigger the need for any policy waiver(s)? No I. PROJECT STATUS AND RATIONALE FOR RESTRUCTURING 1. The Mid Term Review (MTR) carried out in September 2016, confirmed that the Project remains a Government priority and relevant to SERNANP (Servicio Nacional de �reas Naturales Protegidas), which is actively fostering an improved participatory management system in the Guano Islands, Islets, and Capes National Reserve System of Peru (RNSIIPG). 2. Progress, although with delays, is being made in several components: a) Capacity has been strengthened through a series of activities and through the provision of goods for SERNANP as an institution and for the Reserve’s management team. With the Project’s support, SERNANP and the Project Coordination Team have been trained to undertake critical tasks (e.g. zoning of protected sites, biodiversity baseline studies), originally planned to be carried out by consultants. b) The Reserve’s Master Plan has been finalized and approved and its implementation is well under way. The Plan is a key instrument to guide activities critical for the development of the Reserve, including the Collaborative Sub-projects in pilot sites financed under the Project. c) The endowment fund, although not fully capitalized, is generating positive returns. With the receipt of an additional US$2 million (from KfW), expected during the second semester of CY2017, in addition to the nationally recruited firm, a new bidding process will be launched to recruit an international asset management firm. 3. Despite the progress described, due to delays in the design and implementation of the Collaborative Sub-projects (CS), Implementation Progress is currently rated as Moderately Unsatisfactory. Terms of Reference for the development and implementation of the CS have recently been approved and the bidding process is under way. This rating will be reassessed at the next supervision mission (planned for end-April 2017), which will review an agreed upon action plan developed to improve Project performance. 4. SERNANP is fully committed to the Project, which is reflected in the almost US$2 million co-financing already committed by the institution. It is proactively facilitating the operation of the Reserve’s management committee, The World Bank Peru Strengthening Sustainable Management of the Guano Islands, Isles and Capes National Reserve System Project (P129647) responsible for the implementation of the Master Plan, which is expected to play a central role in the execution of the CS. 5. While the PDO and scope of the project remain unchanged, the MTR identified a number of issues, which are addressed in the proposed restructuring. The proposed changes will strengthen the relevance of the Project, allowing for the allocation of funds to activities that meet current needs and support the achievement of the PDO. Monitoring efforts will be focused on fewer, but more relevant indicators that better reflect progress towards achievement of the PDO, thus generating targeted information to enable adequately assessing project outcomes at the time of the Implementation Completion and Results Report (ICR). II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CHANGES 6. The proposed restructuring focuses on three main areas: (i) a revision of the Results Framework (RF), addressing changes in external environment affecting the original design and to adjust a number of indicators accordingly; (ii) the revision of activities within some sub-components, to better align with SERNANP’s work plan, adding and eliminating a number of activities; and, (iii) the revision of the definition of operational costs on the Grant Agreement, to better reflect all operational procedures as they were presented in the PAD. I. Results Framework (RF) 7. The existing RF has a number of inconsistencies, and includes several indicators that are not necessarily measuring progress in the medium (intermediate result indicators) and long run (outcome indicators) towards achieving the PDO. Changes are summarized below and a revised Results Framework is presented thereafter. a) Existing outcome indicators are not sufficiently representative of the key elements of the PDO (improved management of ecosystems, and protection of biodiversity in pilot sites), and therefore, two new PDO indicators are included: (i) Contribution to the maintenance of the Humboldt penguin population and (ii) Score of SERNANP’s monitoring tool “participation radar� (an official tool used to assess participatory management in protected areas). b) The existing core indicator “Marine areas brought under enhanced biodiversity protection (ha)� will be eliminated, as its definition, as stated in the core indicators guidelines1, does not apply to the Project. The approach employed by SERNANP in the management and protection of the Reserve focuses on the improvement of the operational management without limiting access to the marine area. Nevertheless, the impact of the project on marine areas will still be captured in another core indicator “Areas brought under enhanced biodiversity protection�. The latter, will assess the impact of the Project on both terrestrial and marine areas of the Reserve. For measuring, the Project will apply the “Effects generated by Activities� Tool, developed by SERNANP and used in all Natural Protected Areas (NPAs) in Peru. The tool assesses the reduction 1 “This is a proxy indicator that measures marine biodiversity protection as a result of the World Bank operation through either formally gazetting an area as a marine protected area or limiting access to an area for fishing either through the introduction of a quota or licensing system or by introducing seasonal or species closures� The World Bank Peru Strengthening Sustainable Management of the Guano Islands, Isles and Capes National Reserve System Project (P129647) of impact of terrestrial and marine areas, as a result of a strengthened management system which seeks to reduce the degree of impact of the following: effects habitat loss, reduced use of resources, pollution, and exotic species. Additionally, information on protection activities in the marine part of the Reserve, as carried out by SERNANP, will continue to be collected and will be reported in the ICR to show the impact of the Project in marine areas. c) Deficiencies in adequately define a number of indicators, allowing misinterpretations of the indicators and their monitoring methodologies. A clear definition for each indicator is provided to ensure consistency of measurements during the implementation of the Project. d) The results framework includes several intermediate outcome indicators, which are proposed to be eliminated, since they are either: (i) output specific, (ii) not attributable to the Project, or (iii) redundant. Further detail is provided for each indicator below: (i) Information system on RNSIIPG activities developed and operational. According to the institutional policy of SERNANP, the RNSIIPG is required to implement an information system that is established by the institution, rather than develop a parallel system. In this respect, the Project will support the RNSIIPG to improve the already existing system, eliminating it rather than keeping it as an intermediate result indicator. (ii) At least 3 control systems implemented. The PAD does not provide detailed information on this indicator. The activity associated to this indicator is related to the acquisition of equipment for control and monitoring, among others, which corresponds to a product indicator and not to an outcome indicator. In this sense, it is recommended to lower the level and to maintain it as an activity indicator, leaving it out of the results framework. (iii) Increase in financing of basic operations of the RNSIIPG. It is proposed to eliminate this indicator since it is subject to external factors beyond the control of (and not attributable to) the Project. (iv) Percentage of beneficiaries involved in subprojects have maintained or increased their disposable income. In the RF there is already another indicator related to the beneficiaries of the Project (3,570 people benefited by project activities). As part of the development of the Collaborative Subprojects, the impact on the beneficiaries' income from the projects will be measured, thus it will be reported in the ICR. REVISED RESULTS FRAMEWORK PROJECT OUTCOME INDICATORS 2 Original Current Original Outcome Indicators Proposed Changes Target Baseline Status Terrestrial areas brought under Replaced by: Areas brought under enhanced biodiversity 0 0 2,952 enhanced biodiversity protection protection (ha) (Core indicator) (ha) Rationale: This indicator uses the “Effects generated by 3 Activities� Tool, developed by SERNANP and used in all 2 As presented in the PAD. 3 Methodology of "Effects generated by Activities" consists on dividing the National Protected Area (NPA) into grids. The grids cover terrestrial and The World Bank Peru Strengthening Sustainable Management of the Guano Islands, Isles and Capes National Reserve System Project (P129647) Natural Protected Areas (NPAs) in Peru. The tool assesses the reduction of impact of terrestrial and marine areas, as a result of a strengthened management system which seeks to reduce the degree of impact of the following: effects habitat loss, reduced use of resources, pollution, and exotic species. Marine areas brought under Eliminated 0 enhanced biodiversity protection (ha) Rationale: The approach that is being employed by SERNANP is not consistent and differs with the activities required under indicator definition, as stated in the core indicators guidelines. Therefore, it is proposed to eliminate this core indicator. Nonetheless, information on protection activities in the marine part of the Reserve, as carried out by SERNAP, will continue to be collected and will be reported in the ICR to show the impact of the Project in marine areas. None New indicator: Score of SERNANP’s monitoring tool N/A 49% 60% “participation radar� (an official tool of SERNANP, as established in the Reserve’s Master Plan, to assess participatory management in protected areas). Definition: Monitoring tool that assesses 7 different variables: (1) The existence and functioning of management spaces of the different interests existing around Protected Areas (2) Involvement of populations and different actors through commitments to conservation and sustainable development (3) The participation of stakeholders in the management processes of Protected Areas (4) The articulation of protected areas with local, regional and national development processes (5) The existence of communication and information mechanisms and practices (6) The existence of accountability mechanisms and practices (7) The effectiveness of management. Rationale: The indicator is representative of one key element of the PDO (improved management of ecosystems in pilot sites), which was not properly reflected by any original PDO indicators. None New indicator (moved from intermediate outcome to PDO 8,000 7,364 (2016 8,000 level indicator; slightly edited): Contribute to maintain the monthly Humboldt penguin population. average) Definition: Penguin population as measured by AGRO RURAL in the whole Reserve. The measure will take place once a year in the summer time, as recommended by an assessment of biological indicators undertook within the marine areas, buffer zone, NPA boundary, patrol sector and management sector. The methodology registers the probability of occurrence of effects that might cause loss of biodiversity, as well as the anthropogenic activities associated to these effects and their generation. There are four main effects that are taken into account: habitat loss, reduced use of resources, pollution, and exotic species. This information is summarized in quarterly and / or semi-annual reports that are forwarded to the NPA’s General Direction for integration into semi-annual technical reports. Finally, these reports feed the SMART program, which is a tool to systematize the information generated in the control and monitoring actions, records of flora and fauna, human activity and biodiversity. The World Bank Peru Strengthening Sustainable Management of the Guano Islands, Isles and Capes National Reserve System Project (P129647) framework of the project. Target values do not take into account the impact that external factors, such as El Niño, could have on the Penguin population. Additional information could also be drawn from measurements taken by Saint Louis Zoo, which is limited to only specific areas within the Reserve. Although this methodology is considered more rigorous than AGRO RURAL’s, there is no certainty that monitoring by the Zoo will continue. Rationale: The indicator is representative of one key element of the PDO (protection of biodiversity in pilot sites), which was not properly reflected by any original PDO indicators. The indicator added the words “contribute to� to acknowledge that the project only has an indirect impact on the indicator. PROJECT INTERMEDIATE OUTCOME INDICATORS Original Output Indicator Current Proposed changes Baseline Target Status At least 35% of improvement Replaced by: Improvement in marine and coastal management 0 26% 35% in marine and coastal effectiveness compared to METT baseline. management effectiveness compared to METT baseline Definition: The indicator reflects the increase in the METT score, which sums the values of 40 indicators. Each indicator is assigned a value from 0 to 3. The improvement in efficiency is understood as an increase in the total METT score. The analysis of the result will indicate in which of the indicators have directly contributed the actions of the project. The percentage increase is measured on the baseline value that was 41 (measured in the year 2013) from which the percentage increase is measured. Rationale: The target value of 35% should not be part of the indicator. Percentage of beneficiaries Eliminated 0 involved in subprojects have maintained or increased their Rationale: The RF includes another indicator related to the disposable income beneficiaries of the Project (3,570 people benefited by project activities), and therefore it is considered redundant. Nevertheless, as part of the development of the Collaborative Subprojects, the impact on the beneficiaries' income from the projects will be measured; thus it will be reported in the ICR. Increase in financing of basic Eliminated 640,000 operations of the RNSIIPG Rationale: The indicator is subject to external factors and cannot be attributed to the Project. At least 320 staff members of Replaced by: Staff members of SERNANP, other agencies and 10 97 320 SERNANP, other agencies and communities’ actors trained. communities’ actors trained. Definition: The indicator measures the number of people trained in the The World Bank Peru Strengthening Sustainable Management of the Guano Islands, Isles and Capes National Reserve System Project (P129647) topics prioritized in the training plan of the RNSIIPG under the Project framework or in the training carried out in the different Subprojects. The "other government agencies" refer to AGRO RURAL, DICAPI, IMARPE. Local actors refer to fishermen, tour operators, local authorities, members of the management committee, among others. "Trainees" refer to those who have passed (60% of the maximum qualification) the course or courses prioritized in the annual training plans of the Project prepared by SERNANP and in the training plans of the Collaborative Subprojects. In addition to the target of 320 people, the percentage of those who qualify as "satisfactory" to the course will be measured and will obtain at least 70% of the maximum score in the knowledge exam that will be prepared for each course. Rationale: The target value of 320 should not be part of the indicator. Information system on Eliminated No system RNSIIPG activities developed available and operational Rationale: According to the institutional policy of SERNANP, the RNSIIPG must implement the information system that has already been developed and established by the institution, so it is not necessary to develop a parallel one. In this sense, the contribution of the Project will be to support the RNSIIPG to feed this already existing system, so it does not constitute an intermediate result and should correspond to an activity indicator and not to an outcome indicator; therefore, it is proposed to eliminate this indicator. At least 3 control systems Eliminated 0 implemented Rationale: The PAD does not provide detailed information on this indicator. The activity associated to this indicator is related to the acquisition of equipment for control and monitoring, among others, which corresponds to a product indicator and not to a result indicator. 14 planning and management Replaced by: Number of planning and management instruments 0 3 (1 Master 11 instruments developed and developed and implemented. Plan for implemented The target is reduced to 11. RNSIIPG approved. 2 Definition: A developed planning or management tool refers to Zoning Maps a plan (for example a master plan) or any other document that available contains guidelines for management. It does not necessarily (Ballestas have to be approved with a legal norm, unless it is required Islands, Lobos according to the legislation on the matter. de Tierra Planning and management instruments are considered: zoning, Island). zoning updates, local management plans as part of the Subprojects, site plans, management plans, diagnostics, among others. Rationale: The target value of 14 should not be part of the indicator. Endowment established and Unchanged Except for indicator target value for 2015 and 2016, 0 2,000,000 4,000,000 capitalized which changed from US$4 to US$2 million. Rationale: The reduction was introduced to address the delay in The World Bank Peru Strengthening Sustainable Management of the Guano Islands, Isles and Capes National Reserve System Project (P129647) the availability of KfW funds (expected to be disbursed during the first semester of 2017). 3570 persons benefiting from Replaced by: Number of persons benefiting from project 0 0 3,570 project activities, of which activities. 40% are female Definition: Beneficiaries include local actors involved in sustainable economic activities (marketing, crafts, tourism, fishing, etc.), training and other activities of the collaborative Subprojects Rationale: A typo in the end-of-Project target value in the PAD is corrected. The correct value is 3,570 instead of 3,750. The mentioning of 3,570 in the indicator was eliminated as it is mentioned as target value. A specific mention of % of benefitted woman is eliminated. The social guidelines developed for and applied to the Collaborative Subprojects encourage the active involvement of women. Nevertheless, it is difficult to pre- determine the effectiveness of the guidelines as the involvement of women depends of a serious of other factors external to the project (e.g., culture). 6 cooperation mechanisms Replaced by: Number of cooperation mechanisms established. 0 2 3 established Definition: The mechanism of cooperation established refers to the agreement formalized between the SERNANP and the strategic allies of the RNSIIPG: AGRO RURAL, IRD and IMARPE through an agreement. These agreements focus on formalizing the cooperation frameworks that help to improve the management of the RNSIIPG, according to the competencies of each institution. Rationale: Based on the characteristics of the Project, it is considered that, at least, agreements should be established with AGRO RURAL, IRD and IMARPE. In this sense, the target value will be the agreements signed with AGRO RURAL, IRD and IMARPE (three agreements) Actions should be made visible to promote the cooperation of various actors. There will be a reduction of the target value from 6 to 3. It should be noted that the agreements generate obligations and commitments of the parties, which are audited by government control bodies. Maintain Humboldt penguin Moved to PDO level 8,000 7,364 (2016 8,000 population monthly Reasoning: See above (PDO level indicators) under the same average) indicator Increase of Chita fish Eliminated 0 (Anisotremus scapularis) population in reproduction Rationale: Although the distribution of this species has been areas reported as extensive, it has not been monitored in all sites of the RNSIIPG and no baseline information was available. Additionally, due to its mobility, monitoring has proven to be difficult. Therefore, it is recommended to eliminate this indicator from the result framework. Nonetheless, the Project will continue measuring other benthic species (invertebrates). The World Bank Peru Strengthening Sustainable Management of the Guano Islands, Isles and Capes National Reserve System Project (P129647) The World Bank Peru Strengthening Sustainable Management of the Guano Islands, Isles and Capes National Reserve System Project (P129647) II. Revision of activities within Sub-components 8. Modifications are introduced to a few activities within four sub-components (sub-components 1.1, 1.2, 3.1, and 3.3). These changes do not have an impact on projected budget requirements per component. Detail changes are indicated in the table below. Originally activities as indicated in the Proposed changes Rationale PAD Component 1: Institutional strengthening. Sub-component 1.1: Development and implementation of planning and management instruments: a) Zoning module of the RNSIIPG Master Unchanged This is the main activity within this sub-component. It Plan. includes the development of the original zoning modules for some sections of the Reserve, which provided the required data to issue the Master Plan. It also includes the detailed update of the zoning modules of at least all pilot sites. b) Specific management instruments for Unchanged pilot sites and management issues. c) Natural Resources Management plan Eliminated The development of management plans economically for the sustainable harvest of giant managed marine resources falls out of the competencies Patagonian jackknife clam and given to SERNANP. They are the responsibility of the Chilean blue mussel in Punta Salinas. production sector. d) Site Plan from Asia island Replaced by a Given the particularities of the site and the need for diagnostic of tourism assessing the touristic potential of the island first, which will activity in Asia Island guide the definition of norms to regulate, and strategies to define the most appropriate management instruments to be used for tourism in the island. e) RNSIIPG-specific ecological label to Eliminated SERNANP’s strategy is to have a unique green label common certify sustainable economic and to all protected areas, including the RNSIIPG, on which is conservation initiatives within the currently under development. Reserve will be eliminated Sub-component 1.2: Development and Unchanged This sub-component was not revised, however a new implementation of training plans activity was added as explained below. New activity: Implementation of the Project has indicated the need to Communication strengthen communication and dissemination activities to Strategy better report on the achievements of the project across all the interventions. Subcomponent 1.3: Implementation of infrastructure, staffing, and support systems for enhanced surveillance and control a) Strengthening of SERNANP’s Unchanged management, surveillance, and control capabilities in Punta Coles. b) Strengthening of SERNANP’s Unchanged management, surveillance, and The World Bank Peru Strengthening Sustainable Management of the Guano Islands, Isles and Capes National Reserve System Project (P129647) control capabilities in Guañape Islands. c) Strengthening of SERNANP’s Eliminated This activity will be financed with resources from another surveillance and control project (PAN III), financed by KfW, with an expected start infrastructure on Lobos de Tierra date in mid-2017. Island. This decision was made taking into account that any publicly financed infrastructure investment requires a number of steps, including the incorporation in the National System of Public Investment (SNIP), thus there is a likelihood that the implementation of the activity would go beyond the closing date of the Project. d) Development and implementation of Eliminated The project envisaged the development and a system-wide networked database implementation of a database, however, SERNANP is for monitoring, control, and already designing different systems that include biodiversity surveillance. monitoring aspects, and are promoting the use of SMART as a tool for the control and surveillance. Subcomponent 1.4: Development and Unchanged implementation of financial sustainability mechanisms. Component 2: Collaborative regional Unchanged management Component 3: Monitoring and evaluation Subcomponent 3.1: Establishment of an ecological baseline and implementation of a continued biodiversity monitoring and evaluation system. a) Establishment of an ecological Unchanged baseline in Punta Coles, Chincha Islands, and Guañape Islands. b) Implementation of regular ecological Unchanged monitoring in Punta Coles, Chincha Islands, Guañape Islands, and Lobos de Afuera Islands. c) Development of an applied research Activity relocated to It expected to be included within Component 2 as part of plan in Lobos de Afuera. another component the designed and development of collaborative subprojects, not within Subcomponent 3.1 Subcomponent 3.2: Development and Unchanged implementation of a management effectiveness monitoring and evaluation system Subcomponent 3.3: Monitoring and New activity: Financing The PAD indicates that the Project would strengthen the evaluation of overall project the central office of capacity of several sites in the Reserve. However, in performance. the RNSIIPG practice, it is also important to partially support the central office. This is especially the case given the role this office has in coordinating and facilitating to operation of the Reserve’s management committee (governing body of the Reserve), and their role in monitoring of activities on the ground in the whole Reserve. The project finances the rental of the offices of the RNSIIIPG, where the technical The World Bank Peru Strengthening Sustainable Management of the Guano Islands, Isles and Capes National Reserve System Project (P129647) area of the central office of the protected natural area works together with the project coordination team. This office is responsible for the technical management of the RNSIIPG. New activity: Security After one of the regional offices was subject of burglary of of regional offices the money generated by the tourist activities in Islas Ballestas, it became necessary to reinforce the security in the different offices, through a surveillance service Component 4: Project management. Unchanged III. Operating Costs Definition 9. The PAD acknowledges that the Project will strengthen the capacity of PROFONANPE under component 4 (project management), and thus, the need to finance prorated salaries and administrative costs incurred by this organization for the Project. Nevertheless, the definition of “operating costs� utilized in the grant agreement is limited and does not include any reference to prorated salaries and administrative costs. A proposed modification will be reflected in the Grant Agreement under Article III, Schedule 2 Section IV. Withdrawal of Grant Proceeds, literal A. General, numeral 3. (a) “Operating Costs�. III. SUMMARY OF CHANGES Changed Not Changed Change in Results Framework ✔ Change in Components and Cost ✔ Other Change(s) ✔ Change in Implementing Agency ✔ Change in DDO Status ✔ Change in Project's Development Objectives ✔ Change in Loan Closing Date(s) ✔ Cancellations Proposed ✔ Change in Financing Plan ✔ Reallocation between Disbursement Categories ✔ Change in Disbursements Arrangements ✔ Change in Disbursement Estimates ✔ The World Bank Peru Strengthening Sustainable Management of the Guano Islands, Isles and Capes National Reserve System Project (P129647) Change in Systematic Operations Risk-Rating Tool ✔ (SORT) Change in Safeguard Policies Triggered ✔ Change of EA category ✔ Change in Legal Covenants ✔ Change in Institutional Arrangements ✔ Change in Financial Management ✔ Change in Procurement ✔ Change in Implementation Schedule ✔ Change in Economic and Financial Analysis ✔ Change in Technical Analysis ✔ Change in Social Analysis ✔ Change in Environmental Analysis ✔ IV. DETAILED CHANGE(S) RESULTS FRAMEWORK Intermediate Indicators IO_IND _TABLE Improvement in marine and coastal management effectiveness compared to baseline as measured by METT Unit of Measure: Percentage Indicator Type: Custom Baseline Actual (Current) End Target Action Value 0.00 26.00 35.00 Revised Date 18-Oct-2013 20-Mar-2017 31-Mar-2019 Percentage of beneficiaries involved in suprojects have maintained or increased their disposable income Unit of Measure: Percentage Indicator Type: Custom The World Bank Peru Strengthening Sustainable Management of the Guano Islands, Isles and Capes National Reserve System Project (P129647) Baseline Actual (Current) End Target Action Value 0.00 0.00 80.00 Marked for Deletion Date 21-Oct-2013 25-Feb-2016 31-Mar-2019 Increase in financing of basic operations of the RNSIIPG Unit of Measure: Amount(USD) Indicator Type: Custom Baseline Actual (Current) End Target Action Value 640000.00 573000.00 1200000.00 Marked for Deletion Date 21-Oct-2013 25-Feb-2016 31-Mar-2019 Staff members of SERNANP, other government agencies and local communities' actors trained Unit of Measure: Number Indicator Type: Custom Baseline Actual (Current) End Target Action Value 10.00 97.00 320.00 Revised Date 18-Oct-2013 20-Mar-2017 31-Mar-2019 Information system on RNSIIPG activities developed and operational Unit of Measure: Text Indicator Type: Custom Baseline Actual (Current) End Target Action Value No System available no change System operational Marked for Deletion Date 21-Oct-2013 25-Feb-2016 31-Mar-2019 At least 3 control systems on key islands and capes implemented. Unit of Measure: Number Indicator Type: Custom Baseline Actual (Current) End Target Action Value 0.00 0.00 3.00 Marked for Deletion Date 18-Oct-2013 25-Feb-2016 31-Mar-2019 The World Bank Peru Strengthening Sustainable Management of the Guano Islands, Isles and Capes National Reserve System Project (P129647) Number of planning and management instruments developed and implemented Unit of Measure: Number Indicator Type: Custom Baseline Actual (Current) End Target Action Value 0.00 3.00 11.00 Revised Date 18-Oct-2013 20-Mar-2017 31-Mar-2019 Endowment established and capitalized Unit of Measure: Amount(USD) Indicator Type: Custom Baseline Actual (Current) End Target Action Value 0.00 2000000.00 4000000.00 Revised Date 18-Oct-2013 20-Mar-2017 31-Mar-2019 Number of persons benefiting from project activities Unit of Measure: Number Indicator Type: Custom Baseline Actual (Current) End Target Action Value 0.00 0.00 3570.00 Revised Date 21-Oct-2013 20-Mar-2017 31-Mar-2019 Number of cooperation mechanisms established Unit of Measure: Number Indicator Type: Custom Baseline Actual (Current) End Target Action Value 0.00 2.00 3.00 Revised Date 18-Oct-2013 20-Mar-2017 31-Mar-2019 Maintain Humboldt penguin population Unit of Measure: Number Indicator Type: Custom Baseline Actual (Current) End Target Action The World Bank Peru Strengthening Sustainable Management of the Guano Islands, Isles and Capes National Reserve System Project (P129647) Value 8000.00 7364.00 8000.00 Marked for Deletion Date 21-Oct-2013 20-Mar-2017 31-Mar-2019 Increase of Chita fish (Anisotremus scapularis) population in reproduction areas Unit of Measure: Percentage Indicator Type: Custom Baseline Actual (Current) End Target Action Value 0.00 0.00 30.00 Marked for Deletion Date 21-Oct-2013 20-Mar-2017 31-Mar-2019 Global Environment Objective Indicators GEO_IN D_TABLE Areas brought under enhanced biodiversity protection (ha) Unit of Measure: Hectare(Ha) Indicator Type: Core Baseline Actual (Current) End Target Action Value 0.00 0.00 2952.00 Revised Date 18-Oct-2013 25-Feb-2016 31-Mar-2019 Areas brought under enhanced biodiversity protection (ha) Unit of Measure: Hectare(Ha) Indicator Type: Core Baseline Actual (Current) End Target Action Value 0.00 0.00 84454.00 Marked for Deletion Date 18-Oct-2013 25-Feb-2016 31-Mar-2019 Score of SERNANP’s monitoring tool “participation radar� Unit of Measure: Percentage Indicator Type: Custom Baseline Actual (Current) End Target Action Value 0.00 49.00 60.00 New Date 15-Dec-2016 20-Mar-2017 31-Mar-2019 Contribute to maintain the Humboldt penguin population Unit of Measure: Number The World Bank Peru Strengthening Sustainable Management of the Guano Islands, Isles and Capes National Reserve System Project (P129647) Indicator Type: Custom Baseline Actual (Current) End Target Action Value 8000.00 7364.00 8000.00 New Date 18-Oct-2013 20-Mar-2017 31-Mar-2019 COMPONENTS Current Proposed Current Proposed Cost Action Cost Component Name Component Name (US$M) (US$M) Component 1: Institutional Component 1: Institutional strengthening. This component strengthening. This component will build capacity at SERNANP will build capacity at SERNANP 6.90 Revised 6.90 and other institutions involved in and other institutions involved in the manag ement of marine and the manag ement of marine and coastal resources. coastal resources. Component 2: Collaborative Component 2: Collaborative regional management. The regional management. The project will develop socially project will develop socially viable marine management 4.22 No Change viable marine management 4.22 models through locally im models through locally im plemented collaborative plemented collaborative subprojects in 11 pilot sites subprojects in 11 pilot sites Component 3: Monitoring and Component 3: Monitoring and evaluation of biodiversity; evaluation of biodiversity; management effectiveness; management effectiveness; 4.38 Revised 4.38 collaborative subprojects; and collaborative subprojects; and safeguards and admi nistrative safeguards and admi nistrative monitoring. monitoring. Component 4: Project Component 4: Project management. Administrative and management. Administrative and 0.42 No Change 0.42 financial management of the financial management of the Project. Project. TOTAL 15.92 15.92