RP1411v2 RUSUMO FALLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT – DAM & POWERPLANT COMPONENT R E S E T T L E M E N T A C T I O N P L AN (RAP ) VOLUME 2: APPENDICES FINAL REPORT ARTELIA EAU & ENVIRONNEMENT ECHIROLLES NILE BASIN INITIATIVE (NBI) / NILE EQUATORIAL 6, Rue de Lorraine LAKES SUBSIDIARY ACTION PROGRAM (NELSAP) 38130 Echirolles, France 4th Floor, Kigali City Tower, Boulevard du Commerce, Kigali, Tel.: +33 (0)4 76 33 40 00 Rwanda Fax: +33 (0)4 76 33 43 32 DATE: MARCH 2013 REF: 1770050 Coteba & Sogreah, same team, enhanced expertise APPENDICES Appendix 1 Consultation material used during November and December 2012 Appendix 2 Results of consultations in November and December 2012 Appendix 3 Marshland users in villages affected by operation Appendix 4 Compensation rates for annual and perennial crops Appendix 5 Calculation approach for compensation rates for residential structures Appendix 6 Budget Tables Appendix 7 Documentation (minutes of meetings, field reports) Appendix 8 References RUSUMO FALLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT DAM & POWERPLANT COMPONENT R ESE TTLEM EN T AC TI ON PL AN ( R AP ) APPENDIX 1 CONSULTATION MATERIAL USED DURING NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER 2012 Mission in Ngara 13th and 14th February 2013 Meeting with Ngara District Officers - 13th February 2013 The following are the district officers with whom the Social Development and Resettlement Officer consulted; 1. Helman Hume District community Development Officer 2. Saul Wilson Nyamunda Legal Officer 3. Enoch Mponzi land and natural recourses officer 4. Mhina Toba Ally Environment Officer Issues discussed were the following;  Compensation rates for businesses, houses, land  Implementation of the livelihood programme and LADP through district structures  Financial institution to pay compensation funds to PAPs  Training of district Officers as TOTs for financial management training of PAPs Compensation rates for businesses, houses and land for Ngara district The Officers revealed that there no updated compensation rates for businesses, houses and land they also noted that Compensation rates depend on the property being compensated, it's value, location and market value and there are no current rates at the district for Rusumo area. Implementation of the livelihood programme and LADP through district structures The officers supported the idea of implementing the LADP through the district and indicated that they have a similar program with Kabanga Kenel - a mining project which will resettle more people that Rusumo project. The officers said that the Land Officer will always be available and will provide support needed on behalf of the district. Financial institution to pay compensation funds to PAPs  After a long discussion considering a number of factors such as accessibility, charging of interest rates, knowledge and rights of PAPs to compensation, use and owning of a bank accounts the officers recommended National Micro Finance Bank (NMB) which is the only financial institution available in the district. It was noted that cooperatives in Tanzania similar to SACO of Rwanda are not strong and cannot be trusted with handling cash that belong to individuals.  They also recommended that there should be a contract between NMB and Rusumo Project / NELSAP to carry out the role of paying compensation funds to PAPs. The Officers also proposed that the district Community Development Officer should be a signatory to the contract as the district representative and also as RAP implementation focal point person.  The contract with the Bank should indicate the names of the PAPs, location and how much should be given to each PAP. Training of district Officers in financial management as TOTs who will take up the responsibility to train PAPs in the same. After a long discussion the following were resolved;  Financial management training should proceed the reception of the compensation funds by all PAPs.  Community development officer noted that women are vulnerable in such conditions and recommended that joint accounts should be opened for people who are married and that the financial training should be attended by both spouses.  No conditions for people to receive their money should be put in place especially for Rusumo people who are already involved in business. People have the right to access their funds compensation once they need it.  The list of PAPs should be given to the District Commissioner (DC) with amount due to each PAP  The bank should be consulted for advice concerning the modalities of payment and other financial issues. The following district officers were proposed for the Finance management training as TOTs; 1. Community development officer 2. Cooperative officer 3. Trade officer 4. Land officer 5. Agriculture officer They also Proposed that the training should be combined with that of the district officers in Kirehe district which will carry out the same responsibilities in their district. They in particular requested that the Tanzanian Officers be transported to Rwanda for the training. Proposed facilitation of the TOTs for field work to train the PAPs The officers requested to know what their Rwanda counterparts had proposed and after they were informed they proposed a copy and pest of the same which are the following; � Fuel, lunch and communication, � Training materials ( note book, a pens, pencils and plastic file folds for PAPs. For Trainers markers, flipcharts and flipchart holder plus the flipchart bag). � Requested for a lap top for the focal point person to enable him keep records of PAPs and provide monthly reports to NELSAP. � Proposed transport and lunch facilitation for the PAPs who will come for the training. Meeting with the District Commissioner After the above meeting the officers proposed another meeting with the with District commissioner Mr. David Peter Mafipa, to update him on the resolutions of the meeting with district officers and seek his support. In company of the Community development officer who was representing the District Executive Director a meeting with the DC was convened. After introductions the DC was given full update of Rusumo Project and also on the resolutions by the concluded meeting with district officers. He however expressed concerns with cash compensation basing on the ongoing mining project of Kabanga Kenel in Ngara District. He also appreciated the fact that people affected by Rusumo project are few in number compared to those affected by Kambanga Kenel mining project and that majority of those who will be resettled are business people who are used to handling cash. The DC was also in agreement with the resolutions of the district officers and he also promised his support to the implementation of the RAP and the project in general. Meeting with the NMB, Bank Manager; Joseph Mwita The Social Development and Resettlement Officer / NELSAP decided to have a meeting with NMB manager to assess issues and modalities of using their bank to pay compensation fees to the PAPs. In company of the community development officer of Ngara District a meeting with the Bank Manager was held and the following were noted; 1. The project will not be charged fees for paying compensation money as long as the PAPs own accounts with the Bank. The following are the requirements for opening an account with the Bank; Requirements; 1. Full names, date of birth, residential address , telephone no if any and email address if any. 2. Tax identification number. 3. Introductory letter from relevant authority such as government officials e.g. one from the village chief of their residence. 4. The location / village name 5. ID especially election cards, driving license can be used or medical insurance cards. 6. The amount to open the account which should not be less than 15000 TZ shs. 7. Nature of business e.g. peasants, farmer or business person should be indicated. 8. Three passport photographs with blue background 9. Signature or thumb print Note1:  The manger promised that if all the requirements are in place the bank will transport their officers to Rusumo and open accounts for the PAPs with their Bank.  He also suggested that the project should open an account with NMB Ngara deposit the amount which will be transferred to the individual accounts of the PAPs.  If PAPs hold an account with NMB there will be no charges for transfering the amounts due to them to their individual accounts, but if they operate accounts with other financial institutions they will be charged for the transfer process.  The monthly charge for managing a bank account with NMB is 1000 TZ shs which will be charged to the PAPs as well.  The amount one is allowed to withdraw from the bank at once is one shillings to two million shillings.  The ITM machine can be used to with draw from one to one million shillings. Note2: The Bank manager suggested that if the project requires special treatment, a letter requesting and naming the special treatment should be written to head office of NMB through Ngara branch. The account should be a company account and the letter should spell put the currency and terms and conditions for its operations. The Bank manager also provided a number of flyers which can be used to sensitize the PAPs about the operations of the bank. Meeting with village Rusumo village chief - Mr. Keneth Kefa of Rusumo village TZ side 14th Feburary 2013 The above consultation aimed at identification of the project construction sites. Together with the village chief we toured construction sites for water diversion and the dam site. The following are the explanations given by the village chief; Water diversion proposed site;  This occupies about 6 hectors and the residents are awaiting to be resettled.  This is the place said to contain the diversion of the water.  According to the local chief there are about 40 - 60 hh The power house; The local chief also took us through to the proposed site for the power house on the Tanzanian side. It is down at the slope side of the river with about 10 hh and banana plantation gardens. The following are the explanations given by the local chief;  About two hectares are the ones proposed for the construction of the power house.  About ten households are located there. Constructors' place proposed site; The village chief said that about 10 households were marked for the construction of contractors' site but added the proposed site was never surveyed. Fishing activities on the Tanzanian side. A meeting was held with the fishermen and the local chief who shared the following information; o Only one association does fishing on the Kagera and Ruvubo river. This association is not formal and is not yet organized into a cooperative. The name of the association was not known. According to the fishermen farming is more profitable than fishing and fishing is a par time activity. o Since fishing is done on an individual basis and not regular it was not possible to assess how much income is earned from fishing within a certain period of time per house hold. Kirehe Mission 12th and 14th February 2013 On 12th February 2013 most of Kirehe district officials were attending a training in Kayonza however a discussion was held with Madam Niyonagira Natalie in charge of Agriculture Tel: 0788630500 and Innocent Nshimiyimana who is the Proximity Business advisor for Kirehe district. Issues discussed;  Compensation rates for businesses, houses, land  Implementation of the livelihood programme and LADP through district structures  Financial institution to pay compensation funds to PAPs  Training of district Officers as TOTs for financial management training of PAPs Compensation rates for businesses, houses, land in Kirehe district; The officers said that Kirehe district does not have their own rates. They referred to the National Bank as the one which determines compensation rates for property. The officer in charge of lands and compensation was consulted on the telephone with no response. Further consultation with that National Bank are planned. Implementation of the livelihood programme and LADP through district structures The officer proposed the following; o Proposed implementing the livelihood programe as "Ingoboka" programme - where needy people are identified and given affordable and appropriate assistance where the money is sent to the bank accounts of beneficiaries or, o Implementing it through Direct support for Vision Umurenge Programe (VUP) at the sector level. This discussion was not conclusive however it was suggested that as particular activities for the programmes will be named for each district in partnership with the district then appropriate implementation methodology will be determined. Financial institution to pay compensation funds to PAPs After discussion of the RAP and the compensation process the officials proposed Umurenge SACCO as the appropriate channel for compensating the PAPs and gave the following reasons;  SACCO is a commercial institute accessible in most villages and can offer credit to their clients.  Both spouses should be signatories to the account.  SACCO does not have monthly charges.  SACCO is owned by farmers in the area to which most of the PAPs may belong.  No disbursement charges will be charged by SACCO. Training of district Officers as TOTs for financial management training of PAPs The following officers were Proposed people for financial management training at the district level as TOTs to PAPs; 1. Land Officer urbanization and resettlement 2. Agriculture officer 3. Officer in charge of Cooperatives 4. In charge of social affairs and protection 5. Proximity Business advisor Modalities of financial management training The officers proposed the following based on similar passed experiences at the district;  Suggested training of TOTs which can take one week  The module should include Project management (capital, interest, profit and proposal development), diversification of agriculture and livelihood based on accessible resources and market, "icunga mutungo", Bank account opening, account management, when to withdraw and saving)  Suggested that payment of the consultant should be based on the module and based on previous experience approximately 5000 USD may suffice. Note: Suggested that the training should not be done at the district level where district officials can be called out of the training at any time by their leaders. Facilitation for TOTs for a period of one year; The officers proposed the following to facilitation to the TOTs in training of the PAPs into financial management;  Fuel, communication and lunch (the amount to be discussed with the team)  Training material for PAPs and the trainers e.g. note books, a pens, pencils and plastic file folders for PAPs. For Trainers markers, flipcharts and flipchart holder and their bags.  Trainers should make monthly reports to NELSAP  The consultant should design the training programme / plan Note: NELSAP should write a letter requesting for the participants through the ministry of Local Government. The letter must be approved by the same ministry to enable full participation of all officers. Fishing activities in Kirehe district; The following is the information provided by the district officer on fishing activities in Kirehe district; Aquaculture in Kirere district is only based in Kigarama sector;  It is organized under a cooperative.  It is hoped to be a profitable business  Proposed aquaculture in the marshland which will be permanently flooded. Further information collected on Fishing activities by visiting the fishing sites; Discussion was held with the vice president of the cooperative - Madam Mukabisangwa Jacqline. The following is the information she provided;  The fishing ponds belong to KUAKI  For one to become a member she /he pays shares equivalent to 45,000Rwf  Those who do not have money can provide their labor for the cooperative.  New members are still allowed to come in but admission awaits the start of the project.  However if the number gets to fifty gets admission will close. So far 14 people are on the waiting list.  Current membership is 12 men and 18 women.  They currently own 5 pigs which will provide feeds for the fish.  Currently there is no fish. This was stopped when development of a water body which will supply water for irrigation started.  It is now one year and some months and since then fishing activities stopped.  However even before the water body was constructed they had not been able to harvest any fish because of the poor quality of fish fries which had been planted.  They received support from RDB which stopped and have been promised support by KWAMP.  Support received from RDB was for construction of water ponds and also provided the fish fries.  KWAMP provided pigs.  Part of the Shares was used to put up the current structure for the pigs.  Shareholders provide food for the pigs and one of them does cleaning on a daily basis.  The security guard who is also a member is paid for the service. He is paid 17,000 RWF on a monthly basis. The vice president to the cooperative was not able to provide expected output and profit for the cooperative. Visit to SACCO in Kigarama Sector Discussion was held with Kunda Joel an Account of IMIRASSIREYITERAMBERE SACCO - Tel: 078763507 14th February 2013. The branch Manager was on the field but the was in position to provide all needed information. After explanation of the reason for the visit by the Social Development and resettlement Officer / NELSAP, SACCO account shared a list of people who were resettled by the district and where SACCO carried out the duties of paying compensation fees on behalf of the district. Examples of these are the ones who were affected by the activities of KWAMP. He indicated that based on such experiences SACCO of Kigarama would be in position to carry out compensation roles for the Rusumo project affected people. He also revealed that SACCO is an autonous organistaion and therefore it can have a contract with Rusumo project to carry out payment of compensation funds to the PAPs. Requirements or procedures for SACCO to carry out the compensation payment to PAPs; The PAP must own an account with SACCO. This requires and initial deposit of 1100 RWF for the account card and book. The client / PAP in this case must have an ID with 2 passport photographs to facilitate account opening. The contract between SACCO and Rusumo Project must indicate how much money will be given to SACCO and a list of PAPs who will benefit from the mentioned amount indicating how much will be given to an individual PAP. The compensation money is deposited on SACCO account in BK which is 068- 0319396-02. This is a RWF account and important to note that SOCCO does not operate a dollar account. The is no limit on the membership they can always receive any number. In the process of transferring amounts to the individual accounts it is a policy by SACCO that each individual is charged 300 RWF. Even Tanzanians can be received as long as they adheres to rules and regulations of SACCO. No limit for on withdraws, however if one needs to withdraw more than 500,000 RWF he or she has to communicate it to SACCO in advance of one day. However, whoever owns an account with SACCO is obliged to save at list 1000 RWF on his account. In other words he cannot withdraw all the money from the account there must be a balance of 1,000 RWF. Another obligation for someone who owns an account with SACCO is that he /she must pay for shares equivalent to 5,000 RWF which can be paid at different times in a year. This amount for shares is paid once one decides to leave SACCO. After one has paid for the shares, he / she then gets access to all services offered by SACCO such as access to credit. Accessibility to credit considers that the clients' account has be active within a period of the last 3 months from the time of credit seeking. The amount of credit offered does not exceed 2,000,000 RWF paid within 2 years but one can even pay in a less period depending on his / her affordability. If one wants to close the account he /she writes a letter requesting for the same and he is then allowed to close. In so doing he is paid all the money on his account and he is also paid his / her 5,000 RWF for the shares since he /she is no longer considered as a member. Conclusion and recommendations 1. The project shouldn't hire finance institutions to carry out the compensation of PAPs. Instead the project should make use of existing which is less costly and empowering the PAPs in issues of finance management. 2. It is recommended that all PAPs should undergo finance management training before reception of compensation funds. This call for a quick action in finance management training such that it does not become a load block to compensation process. 3. All spouses should undertake finance management training to as a mitigation measure for conflicts that may arise from the use of compensation funds. 4. Use of district officers as TOTs for finance management training is less costly, manageable and sustainable as opposed to hiring and individual or consultant firm to do it. It will ease monitoring of the same. 5. Training of the TOTs for Ngara district should be combined with training of Kirehe district officers. This will enable harmonized finance training for the PAPs, delivery of same messages, less costly and it will also ease monitoring process. 6. NELSAP should hold workshops with district officers to discuss and decide on the live hood restoration program and LADP plan activities based on the needs and recourses area and people. This will ensure ownership and incorporation of the programs in the existing plans and activities of the districts. 7. A study to inform diversification of livelihood from agriculture to improved aquaculture, apiculture etc in the project area is necessary if the same activities are to be considered in the LADP. P.O. Box 6759 Kigali Nile Basin Initiative Rwanda NELSAP-CU Telephone: +250 08307334 Fax: +250 580043 E-mail: nelcu@nilebasin.org Annex A: Project Factsheet: Rusumo hydroelectric Power Project Project Location: The Rusumo hydroelectric power project station is located at Rusumo falls on the border between Rwanda and Tanzania Financiers: The Hydroelectric power station and the transmission lines to three countries will be jointly funded by the World Bank (project),the African Development Bank (AfDB) (Transmission lines), and other development partners. Project cost: Investment cost for both power plant and the transmission lines will cost about USD $ 440 million(Source: Feasibility Reports). Implementing Agency: The Nile Basin Initiative/Nile Equatorial Lakes Subsidiary Action Program (NELSAP), is the Executing Agency on behalf of the three countries of Burundi, Rwanda and Tanzania. Ownership: A jointly owned utility/institutional mechanism for the co- management of power generation and distribution to national power utilities will be set up. Purpose: The project will have will have an installed capacity of 80MW (Run of River scheme at 1320masl) to be shared among Rwanda, Tanzania and Burundi. The project will also be accompanied by a local area development program (LADP) focused on social and environmental management. Transmission Lines: The transmission lines will extend from the power generation plant: From Ngara to Gitega in Burundi covering a distance of 168km, from Rusumo to Shango substation (Kigali-Rwanda) covering a distance of115km, and to Tanzania two lines will be constructed: Rusumo to Ngara covering a distance of 81km and Rusumo to Biharamuro covering a distance of 684km, both lines covering a distance of 149km. Project Start: The studies started in 2007 after the ministers of energy declaration for a joint Project Development Agreement (JPDA) in 2006. Project Completion: Construction of the power project is expected to start early 2014 and be completed by 2017. Project Rationale: The power project comes to address an acute shortage of electricity experienced by the three Akagera sub-regional countries of Rwanda, Tanzania and Burundi which is negatively affecting the three counties economies and the livelihoods of their citizens. The project aims to support sustainable management of the Akagera river basin and promote growth and poverty reduction whilst managing environmental assets. Beneficiaries: The generated electricity will be equally shared among the three countries each benefiting 26MW directly connected to the national grid through the transmission lines. Annex B: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Qn: How much electricity will be generated from Rusumo Hydroelectric power Project? A: The Project will generate about 80MW Qn: What share of electricity is each country expected to benefit from this power project? What is the share of the other countries? A: All countries will have equal share of electricity that will be generated by the power plant; about 26 MW Qn: Who is the main funder of the power plant? Are there other financiers to this Project? How much are the Governments (Rwanda, Tanzania and Burundi contributing to this project? A: The contribution of the 3 Governments will be determined when the financing plan will be finalized. Qn: How much will the power plant cost? Is the funding a grant, a donation or loan? A:The Hydroelectric power plant is expected to cost about USD. 340million excluding the transmission lines whose funding is yet to be secured. Funding will be loans and grants. This depends of the countries. Qn: Of what economic significance is this power project to the three countries’ development agenda? A: The power generated from this plant will be connected to the three countries’ national grid to support commercial and industrial activities . The production will replace expensive energy that some countries are getting through diesel plants. I will also reduce the deficits that some countries have. Qn: How many people are likely to be affected in the three countries as a result of the power project? A: About 35 villages (30 villages in Rwanda & 5 in Tanzania) are likely to be directly and indirectly affected. Qn: When will the resettlement process start? A: Resettlement will start soon after the census of the affected households is completed; four months (Rwanda) and six months (Tanzania) before the dam construction. Qn: Who will pay the resettlement/compensation packages to the displaced citizens of the three countries? A: Resettlement/compensation packages will be paid by the project through the ministry of Finance. Qn: What are the likely direct benefits to communities around the project area?Jobs, low or no tariff, LADP including medical facilities, community schools, project grants, etc? A: The local communities will benefit from job opportunities during dam construction. They will also benefit from LADP livelihood restoration schemes Qn: What impacts will the power plant have on the surrounding environment? A: No environmental impacts will occur to the surrounding areas as a result of the dam Qn: When will the power project start? When will it be completed? A: Project construction is estimated to start in early 2014 and completion is expected in 2017. P.O. Box 6759 Kigali Ibikorwa byo mu kibaya cya Rwanda Nil NELSAP-CU Telephone: +250 08307334 Fax: +250 580043 E-mail: nelcu@nilebasin.org Umugereka A: Ifishi y’ibisubanuro y’umushinga: Umushinga w’amashanyarazi wa Rusumo Aho umushinga ukorera: Sitatiyo y’umushinga w’amashanyarazi iri ku Masumo ya Rusumo, ku mupaka w’u Rwanda na Tanzaniya. Abaterankunga: Sitation hamwe n’imirongo ikwirakwiza amashanyarazi mu bihugu uko ari bitatu izaterwa nkunga na Banki y’isi (umushinga nyirizina), Banki ny’Afurika itsura amajyambere (imirongo ikwirakwiza amashanyarazi), n’abandi bafatanyabikorwa mu iterambere. Agaciro k’umushinga: Uruganda n’imirongo ikwirakwiza amashanyarazi bizatangwaho amadolari y’Amerika agera kuri miliyoni Magana ane na mirongo ine (440) (ibyo byatangajwe na raporo yerekana uko uwo mushinga uzakorwa) Ikigo kizashyira mu bikorwa uwo mushinga: Umushinga uzashyirwa mu bikorwa ni Ikigo gikurikirana ibikorwa byo mu kibaya cya Nil (NBI)/Porogaramu y’ibikorwa rusange y’ibiyaga bya Nil (NELSAP); icyo kigo kikaba gihagarariye ibihugu bitatu bikurikira : u Burundi, u Rwanda, na Tanzaniya. Ikigo kizakurikirana imikorere y’uruganda: Ikigo gihuriweho n’ibyo bihugu uko ari bitatu/uburyo bwo gukorera hamwe kizashyirwaho gifite inshingano zo gukurikirana imikorere y’uruganda ruzakora rukanakwirakwiza amashanyarazi mu bigo by’ibyo bihugu. Intego: Uwo mushinga uzagira ubushobozi bwo gutanga umuriro ungana na 80MW (mu nkengero z’uruzi ku gipimo cya1320masl), uwo muriro uzasaranganywa hagati y’u Rwanda, Tanzaniya n’u Burundi. Uwo mushinga uzanafatanya na porogaramu yo guteza imbere akarere uzaba ukoreramo ; iyo porogaramu izibanda cyane cyane ku kwita ku mibereho myiza n’ibidukikije. Imirongo ikwirakwiza amashanyarazi: iyi mirongo izaturuka ku ruganda: kuva Ngara kugera i Gitega mu Burundi, ahantu h’ibirometero ijana na mirongo itandatu n’umunani(168), kuva Rusumo ku gasitasiyo ka Shango (Kigali-Rwanda) ahantu h’ibirometero Ijana na cumi n’ishanu( 115km) ; no muri Tanzaniya hazubakwa indi mirongo ibiri ; kuva Rusumo kugera Ngara, ahantu h’ibirometero mirongo inani n’imwe (81km) no kuva Rusumo kugera Biharamuro ahantu h’ibirometero mirongo itandatu n’umunani(68km) ; iyo mirongo yombi izanyura ahantu h’ibirometero ijana na mirongo ine n’icyenda (149km). Igihe umushinga uzatangirira: inyigo z’umushinga zatangiye muri 2007 nyuma y’amasezerano y’abaminisitiri b’ingufu yo muri 2006 yari agamije gukora umushinga rusange. Ishyirwa mu bikorwa ry’uwo mushinga: ibikorwa by’ubwubatsi bw’umushinga w’amashanyarazi biteganyijwe gutangira mu ntangiriro za 2014 bikazarangira muri 2017. Akamaro k’umushinga: uyu mushinga w’amashanyarazi uje ukenewe kuko uzakemura ikibazo cy’ibura rikabije ry’amashanyarazi muri ibi bihugu uko ari bitatu byo mu karere k’Akagera, aribyo u Rwanda, Tanzaniya n’u Burundi ; iryo bura ry’umuriro rifite ingaruka mbi ku bukungu bw’ibyo bihugu ndetse no ku mibereho y’abaturage. Uyu mushinga ugamije gucunga ku buryo burambye ikibaya cy’uruzi rw’Akagera ndetse no guteza imbere ubukungu no kurwanya ubukene, utibagiwe kwita ku bidukikije. Abagenerwa bikorwa: amashanyarazi avuye muri uyu mushinga azasaranganywa ku buryo bungana hagati y’ibihugu uko ari bitatu : ni ukuvuga ko MW 26 zizagezwa kuri rezo ya buri gihugu zinyuze muri ya mirongo yavuzwe haruguru. Umugereka B: Ibibazo bikunzwe kubazwa Ikibazo: Amashanyarazi azava mu mushinga w’ingufu wa Rusumo azaba angana iki ? A: Uyu mushinga uzatanga umuriro ungana na MW 80 Ikibazo: Buri gihugu kizagira imigabane ingana iki muri uyu mushinga w’ingufu ? imigabane y’ibindi bihugu izaba ingana iki ? A: Ibihugu byose uko ari bitatu bizagira imigabane ingana y’amashanyarazi avuye muri uyu mushinga w’ingufu : ni ukuvuga MW 26 Ikibazo: Ni uwuhe muterankunga w’ibanze w’uruganda? Hari abandi bazatera inkunga uyu mushinga? Leta z’ibi bihugu uko ari bitatu zizagira ruhare ki muri uyu mushinga (Rwanda, Tanzanie et Burundi) ? A: Uruhare rw’izi Leta ruzamenyekana ari uko gahunda yo kugenera inkunga uyu mushinga imaze kunonosorwa. Ikibazo: Uru ruganda rw’amashanyarazi ruzaba rufite agaciro kangana iki ? Amafaranga azatangwa azaba ari inkunga, impano cyangwa se inguzanyo ? A: Amafaranga akenewe mu kubaka uru ruganda ageze kuri miliyoni magana atatu na mirongo ine ($340M) z’amadolari y’Amerika, ukuyemo imirongo ikwirakwiza amashanyarazi igishakirwa inkunga y’amafaranga. Amafaranga yose azatangwa azaba ari inguzanyo cyangwa inkunga,bitewe n’imiterere y’inkunga ya buri gihugu. Ikibazo: Uyu mushinga w’ingufu uzagira izihe ngaruka z’ubukungu ku bijyanye na gahunda y’iterambere za biriya bihugu uko ari bitatu? A: Amashanyarazi azava muri uru ruganda azagezwa kuri rezo ya buri gihugu hagamijwe kunganira ibikorwa by’ucuruzi n’inganda. Byongeye kandi, ayo mashanyarazi azunganira bimwe mu bihugu ku bijyanye n’ibiciro bihanitse ibyo bihugu byarihaga mu nganda za diesel. Azanagabanya ibura ry’umuriro muri bimwe muri ibi bihugu. Ikibazo: Uyu mushinga uzagira ingaruka ku bantu bangana iki muri ibi bihugu uko ari bitatu? A: Uyu mushinga uzagira ingaruka ku misozi igera kuri mirongo itatu n’itanu(35) (mirongo itatu (30) yo mu Rwanda, n’itanu (5) yo muri Tanzaniya) ku buryo buziguye n’ubutaziguye. Ikibazo: Gahunda yo kwimura abantu izatangira ryari? A: lyi gahunda izantangira ari uko hamaze gukorwa ibarura ry’ingo zizimurwa kubera uyu mushinga : ameze ane (Rwanda) n’atandatu (Tanzaniya) mbere y’uko urugomero rwubakwa. Qn: Amafaranga yo kwishyura abantu bimuwe mu byabo kubera umushinga azarihwa nande muri ibi ihugu uko ari bitatu? A: Amafaranga yindishyi azatangwa n’umushinga binyuze muri muri minisiteri y’imari. Qn: Ni izihe nyungu uyu mushinga ufitiye abatuye hafi y’awo ? imirimo, igiciro cy’umuriro giciriritse cyangwa kutariha umuriro, porogaramu zo guteza imbere abaturiye umushinga zirimo amavuriro, amashuri, inkunga z’umushinga, n’ibindi...? A: Abaturiye uyu mushinga bazabona akazi ko kubaka urugomero. Bazanungukira muri iriya gahunda yokuzamura imibereho y’abaturage bo muri ako gace. Ikibazo: Ni izihe ngaruka ruriya ruganda ruzagira ku bidukikije? A: Nta ngaruka n’imwe ruriya rugomero ruzagira ku batuye mu nkengero zarwo. Ikibazo: Uyu mushinga uzatangira ryari ? uzarangira ryari? A: Hateganijwe ko imirimo y’ubwubatsi izatangira mu ntangiriro za 2014 ikazarangira muri 2017. P.O. Box 6759 Kigali Ari ya Bonde la mto Naili Rwanda NELSAP-CU Telephone: +250 08307334 Fax: +250 580043 E-mail: nelcu@nilebasin.org Kiambatanisho A: Fomu ya maelezo kuhusu mradi : nishati ya umeme wa maji wa Rusumo Eneo la mradi: kituo cha mradi wa umeme wa maji wa Rusumo uko kwenye Falls za Rusumo ku mpaka kati ya Rwanda na Tanzania Wafadhili : kituo cha uzalishaji wa umeme kwa njia ya maji pamoja na njia za uunganishaji wa hizo nchi tatu vitafadhiliwa moja kwa moja na Benki ya Dunia na Benki ya Maendeleo ya Afrika (ADB), pia na washirika wengine wa maendeleo. Gharama ya mradi: gharama ya uwekezaji kwa ajili ya uzalishaji wa umeme na ya njia za uunganishaji itakuwa takribani dola milioni 400 ($400,000,000) (Tokeo: Ripoti ya uchunguzi) Shirika la utekelezaji : NELSAP (Mpango wa Bonde la Naili /Programu ya Utendaji tanzu ya ziwa za ekwatoriol ya mto Naili) ndilo shirika tendaji kwa ajili ya nchi hizo tatu, yaani Burundi, Rwanda na Tanzania. Umilikaji : Ushirikiano wa pamoja/utaratibu wa kitaasisi utaanzishwa kwa ushirikiano katika usimamizi wa kiwanda cha uzalishaji na usambazaji wa huduma za kitaifa na nishati. Lengo : mradi huu utakua na uwezo wa mitambo ya Megawati 80 (kando ya mto kwa 1320 masl) ambayo itagawa kati ya Rwanda, Tanzania na Burundi. Mradi utafuatana na mpango wa maendeleo wa eneo la mtaa (PDZL) linalolengwa katika usimamizi wa mradi kijamii na kimazingira. Njia za usambazaji : njia za usambazaji zitatokea kwenye kiwanda cha uzalishaji wa umeme : tokea Ngara mpaka Gitega huko Burundi kwa umbali wa km 168, tokea Rusumo hadi kituo kidogo cha Shango (Kigali-Rwanda) kwa umbali wa km 115, pia kutajengwa laini mbili huko Tanzania : toka Rusumo hadi Ngara kwa umbali wa 81 km, pia toka Rusumo hadi Biharamuro kwa umbali wa km 684 ; laini hizo mbili zitafunga umbali wa km 149. Tarehe ya kuanza kwa mradi : utafiti ulianza mwaka wa 2007 baada ya tangazo ya Mawaziri wa Nishati kwa Mkataba wa Maendeleo wa Mradi wa pamoja (ADPC) mwaka 2006. Utekelezaji wa mradi : ujenzi wa mradi wa umeme unatarajiwa kuanza mapema mwaka wa 2014 na kukamilishwa mwaka wa 2017. Umuhimu wa mradi : Hiyi ndiyo wakati inayofaa kwa mradi wa nishati ili kutatua tatizo la uhaba mkubwa wa umeme kaitika nchi hizi tatu za ukanda huu wa kagera, yaani Rwanda, Tanzania na Burundi. Uhaba huo unaafiri na kudhuru uchumi wa nchi hizo tatu na vyanzo vya mapato ya wakazi wao. Mradi unalenga usimamizi maalamu wa bonde la mto Kagera pamoja na kukuza uchumi na kupungunza umaskini wakati kuhakikisha usimamizi wa mazingira. Wanaofadia : umeme utakao zalishwa utagawanywa kwa usawa kati ya nchi hizo tatu, ikiwa Megawati 26 kwa kila nchi ambayo itaunganishwa moja kwa moja na gridi ya taifa kupitia laini za usambazaji. Kiambatanisho B: Maswali yanayoulizwa mara kwa mara [MYM] Swl : kiasi gani ya umeme ambao utazalishwa na huu mradi wa nishati wa maji ya Rusumo ? Jb : Mradi utatoa takribani MW 80 Swl : Je, ni asilimia ngapi ya umeme kila nchi itapata katika mradi huu wa uzalishaji wa umeme ? Je, sehemu ya nchi nyingine ni gani ? Jb : Nchi zote zitakua na sehemu sawa ya umeme unaozalishwa na kiwanda cha nishati/umeme : takrikibani MW 26 Swl: Je, nani mfadhili mkuu wa kiwanda? Je, kuna wafadhili wengine kwa mradi huu? Je, upi mchango wa Serikali za nchi hizo tatu (Rwanda, Tanzania na Burundi) katika mradi huu? Jb ; Mchango wa hizo Serikali tatu itajulikana wakati mpango wa ufadhili utakuwa umekamilishwa. Swl:Je, ni ipi gharama ya nishati ya uzalishaji wa umeme? Je, itakuwa ruzuku, mkopo au zawadi? Jb:Gharama za kiwanda cha uzalishaji wa umeme kwa maji unakadiriwa dola milioni 340, ila fedha za laini za usambazaji wa umeme bado kupatikana. Fedha itakuwa katika mfumo wa mikopo na misaada, inategemea nchi. Swl:Je, ni upi umuhimu wa kiuchumi wa mradi huu wa nishati katika programu za maendeleo ya hizi nchi tatu? Jb:Nishati zinazozalishwa katika kiwanda hii zitaunganishwa na gridi ya taifa ya nchi tatu katika kusaidia shughuli za biashara na viwanda. Uzalishaji utaongeza nishati ambao baadhi ya nchi zilikuazinalipa kwa beyi kali kwa viwanda vya uzalishaji wa umeme kwa njia ya dizeli. Itakupunguza pia uhaba wa nishati katika baadhi ya nchi. Swl: Je, ni watu wangapi wanaotarajiwa kuathirika na huu mradi katika hizi nchi tatu? Jb:Karibuni vijiji 35 (vijiji 30 nchini Rwanda & 5 Tanzania) vitaathirika kwa njia moja au nyingine. Swl: Lini mchakato wa kuanza kuhamisha watu wa maeneo hayo? Jb: Uhamishaji utaanza mapema kama sensa ya jamii zilizoathirika inatekelezwa, miezi minne (Rwanda) na miezi sita (Tanzania) kabla ya ujenzi wa bwawa hilo. Swl: Nani atalipa gharama kuhamishwa / fidia kwa watu waliotohamishwa kwenye makazi yao katika hizi nchi tatu? Jb: Gharama ya makazi mapya/ fidia italipwa na mradi kupitia Wizara ya Fedha. Swl: Je, ni ipi faida ya moja kwa moja kwa jamii zinazoishi karibu na eneo la mradi? Ajira, kupunguza kiwango au bila malipo, PDZL itaweka vifaa vya matibabu, shule kwa jamii, fidia toka kwa mradi....? Jb: Jumuiya za Mitaa zitafaidika na fursa za ajira wakati wa ujenzi wa bwawa hilo. Watu wa pale pia watafaidika marejesho mipango ya vyanzo vya mapato kwa njia ya PDZL. Swl: Je, ni madhara gani kiwanda cha nishati kitakua nayo juu ya mazingira ya jirani? Jb: Hakutakuwa athari ya kimazingira itaosababishwa na bwawa juu ya maeneo ya mitaa. Swl: Je, ni ipi tarehe ya kuanza kwa mradi? Je, ni ipi tarehe ya kukamilisha kazi za ujenzi? Jb: Ujenzi unatarajiwa kuanza mwaka wa 2014 na kukamilika mwaka wa 2017. Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee Interview with village resettlement committee Name of No. of village (SNC ID) Village Date of Name of interviewer Interview Participants 1 (members of 2 resettlement committee) 3 4 5 6 Would you please tell us about the total size of marshland which is cultivated by the people in your village? About ……… m2 In your community, is there cultivatable marshland which is currently NOT used by the people in your village? Can you estimate the area of marshland which is currently not used, but which could be allocated to users in the future? About …….. m2 What is the portion of cultivated marshland in your village in the total of the cultivated land? About ……… % If it is difficult to tell the percentage: Less than a quarter of the total land is marshland  About a quarter of the total land is marshland  About half of the total land is marshland  About three quarters of the total land is marshland  Almost all of the cultivated land is marshland  All the land we cultivate is marshland  1 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee What are the most important annual crops that people in your village cultivate on the marshland? Could you also tell us about the yield of the most important annual crops for a normal year? Most important seasonal crops yield per m2 in a normal year (kg) 1 2 3 4 5 What are the most important permanent crops or trees that people in your village cultivate on the marshland? Could you also tell us about the yield of the most important permanent crops for a normal year? Most important seasonal crops For trees: yield per tree in a normal year (kg) For other permanent crops: yield per m2 in a normal year 1 2 3 4 5 Could you please tell us, how the people in your village use the production from the marshland? People use marshland production fully for household consumption  In our village, Less than a quarter of the marshland users sell products on the market  About a quarter of the marshland users sell products on the market  About half of the marshland users sell products on the market  2 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee About three quarters of the of the marshland users sell products on the market  Almost all of the marshland users sell products on the market  All the marshland users sell products on the market  For the people in your village, who sell marshland products on the market, what would be the usual range of cash income from the market sale in a good year? Cash income from marshland product sale is between ________ and _________ RWF per year Does it happen that the marshland cannot be cultivated, because it dries out too slow? No, this does never happen  Yes, it happens - once in two years  - once in 5 years  - once in 10 years  - very seldom  In a year where there is no harvest from marshland, how do people manage the situation? Loss of harvest from People have to purchase more People have to borrow cash to marshland is not a serious products in the market than in manage the loss of production problem for a normal year Less than a quarter of the users Less than a quarter of the users Less than a quarter of the users A quarter of the users A quarter of the users A quarter of the users Half of the users Half of the users Half of the users Three quarters of the users Three quarters of the users Three quarters of the users Almost all users Almost all users Almost all users Other statements on the management of loss of marshland production, please explain: 3 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee In your village, how many households are members in an agricultural cooperative? From the cooperative members in your village, how many do cultivate marshland? From the cooperative members in your village, how many cultivate marshland and are female headed households? What are the main benefits people in your village get from membership in an agricultural cooperative? Please explain: Are there people in your village, for whom the production from marshland is of special importance? If yes, please explain, who these people are and why marshland production is so important for them Are there people in your village, whose agricultural production depends entirely on marshland production? If yes, how many households fully depend on marshland production? From the households in your village fully depending on marshland, how many are women headed households`? Does it ever happen that your permanent crops outside the marshland are flooded? No, this does never happen  Yes, it happens - once in two years  - once in 5 years  - once in 10 years  - very seldom  4 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee Thank you very much for your support! Signature of participants 5 village name and village number (SNC ID) date of village consultation Interview on table with village chief completed  Consultation meeting Number of participants Duration of meeting Observations Please record your observations during the meeting, Did the meeting go smoothly? Were there any disputes amongst the participants? If yes, please explain. Where there any concerns raised by the participants? If yes, please explain. Any other observations. For the female heads of households in the list of marshland users, did they all come to the meeting or were they represented by male household members? Name and signature of rapporteur: RUSUMO FALLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT DAM & POWERPLANT COMPONENT R ESE TTLEM EN T AC TI ON PL AN ( R AP ) APPENDIX 2 RESULTS OF CONSULTATIONS IN NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER 2012 village name and village number (SNC ID) 151 EAST RUSUMO date of village consultation: 14th November 2012 Interview on table with village chief completed  YES Village chief: NDARUHUTSE Emmanuel Consultation meeting Number of participants 15 participants were present in the meeting Duration of meeting 2hours Observations Please record your observations during the meeting, Did the meeting go smoothly? Were there any disputes amongst the participants? If yes, please explain. Where there any concerns raised by the participants? If yes, please explain. Any other observations.  The meeting went smoothly. The Team of NELSAP together with ARTELIA supervisors have given enough information about the project. They explained the scheme to be used which is “Run of River Scheme “and how the impact will be reduced by adopting this Run of River Scheme. This was the good news for the people who will lose the big part of their land.  The People, who will be affected by the project, are those who cultivate in Marshland.  Participants asked different questions: How much money they will be given? When and how the money will be given to them?  For those who possess only the marshland, their important concern is to get another land which is suitable for cultivation.  Some people (old men) failed to estimate their land; they were helped by their neighbours.  Number of participants:15  Among 15 participants, 4 were women headed households.  Number of households by SNC:3 Households  New number of households: 15 Households  The number increased from 3 to 15  The Total area cultivated in (Ha): 8.56 ha  Marshland area cultivated in (Ha):5.06 ha. 3/15 Household depends entirely on Marshland production. village name and village number (SNC ID): NYAKIZIBA Village/Sub-Village: KABUYE date of village consultation 20TH November 2012 Interview on table with village chief completed  YES Sub-Village chief: Charles KANANI Consultation meeting Number of participants 24 participants were presents Duration of meeting 3 hours Observations Please record your observations during the meeting, Did the meeting go smoothly? Were there any disputes amongst the participants? If yes, please explain. Where there any concerns raised by the participants? If yes, please explain. Any other observations.  The Tanzanian administration is different from Rwandan administration. The tanzanian villages correspond to Rwandan Sectors, Sub-villages correspond to the Rwandan Villages.  The meeting was a bit different from the previous meeting in Rwanda.  Note that, we elaborated the new village and sub-village, the village given by SNC were not true, and didn’t correspond to the reality on the ground.  Tanzanians misunderstood this project. Tanzania local leaders also didn’t explain to their people about the project albeit they helped us elaborate the villages and sub- villages and sort out the persons who cultivate the Marshland.  The Team of NELSAP together with ARTELIA supervisors have given enough information about the project, and why the scheme have been changed from the Intermediate development scheme to the Run Of River Scheme. The change of the scheme was in order to reduce the impact that will be caused by the project. The explanations to people were so clear. The explanation was the good news to some people and also bad news to others who were expecting to receive the compensation fees, the all people who were registered during the first study, they have been told to stop the cultivation and to wait for the compensation fees.  We have met two different and extreme cases of people in Tanzania.one part of people were happy to receive the money for compensation. The other party of the population were saying that their lands in the Marshland are invaluable. They said they received an inheritance from their parents; they will inherit to their children too. We remarked that the Tanzanians don’t consider this project as their own. They misunderstood the project. We were expecting all of them to like the project and to appreciate the change that the project will bring. They are the ones who own the very big uphill land comparing to the Rwandans  The People, who will be affected by the project, are those who cultivate in Marshland.  The population raised a point that NELSAP team have to go and explain to people who are still waiting for money, and are not cultivating and those same people are no longer concerned by the project.  Participants asked different questions: How much money they will be given? When and how the money will be given to them?  Number of households: 24 Households.  The Total area cultivated in (Ha): 37.75 ha  Marshland area cultivated in (Ha): 18.25 ha. For the female heads of households in the list of marshland users, did they all come to the meeting or were they represented by male household members? 8 Women heads of households were present. Name and signature of rapporteur: GATETE William(NELSAP)& NIRAGIRE Henriette(Artelia). village name and village number (SNC ID) Village: NYAKIZIBA / Sub-village: KYENDA date of village consultation 20th November 2012 Interview on table with village chief completed  YES Sub-village chief: LENATHUS RAPHAEL Consultation meeting Number of participants 66 PARTICIPANTS Duration of meeting 3 HOURS Observations Please record your observations during the meeting, Did the meeting go smoothly? Were there any disputes amongst the participants? If yes, please explain. Where there any concerns raised by the participants? If yes, please explain. Any other observations.  The Tanzanian administration is different from Rwandan administration. The tanzanian villages correspond to Rwandan Sectors, Sub-villages correspond to the Rwandan Villages.  The meeting was a bit different from the previous meeting in Rwanda.  Note that, we elaborated the new village and sub-village, the village given by SNC were not true, and didn’t correspond to the reality on the ground.  Tanzanians misunderstood this project. Tanzania local leaders also didn’t explain to their people about the project albeit they helped us elaborate the villages and sub- villages and sort out the persons who cultivate the Marshland.  The Team of NELSAP together with ARTELIA supervisors have given enough information about the project, and why the scheme have been changed from the Intermediate development scheme to the Run Of River Scheme. The change of the scheme was in order to reduce the impact that will be caused by the project. The explanations to people were so clear. The explanation was the good news to some people and also bad news to others who were expecting to receive the compensation fees, the all people who were registered during the first study, they have been told to stop the cultivation and to wait for the compensation fees.  We have met two different and extreme cases of people in Tanzania.one part of people were happy to receive the money for compensation. The other party of the population were saying that their lands in the Marshland are invaluable. They said they received an inheritance from their parents; they will inherit to their children too. We remarked that the Tanzanians don’t consider this project as their own. They misunderstood the project. We were expecting all of them to like the project and to appreciate the change that the project will bring. They are the ones who own the very big uphill land comparing to the Rwandans  The People, who will be affected by the project, are those who cultivate in Marshland.  The population raised a point that NELSAP team have to go and explain to people who are still waiting for money, and are not cultivating and those same people are no longer concerned by the project.  Participants asked different questions: How much money they will be given? When and how the money will be given to them?  Number of households: 66 Households.  The Total area cultivated in (Ha): 258.463 ha  Marshland area cultivated in (Ha): 61.373 ha. For the female heads of households in the list of marshland users, did they all come to the meeting or were they represented by male household members? 3 Women heads of households were present. Name and signature of rapporteur: MBABAZI Janinah(NELSAP)& ISHIMWE Armand(Artelia). village name and village number (SNC ID) 155 NSHUNGERUZI date of village consultation :14TH November 2012 Interview on table with village chief completed  YES Village chief: SEMURYANGO Raphael Consultation meeting Number of participants 57 participants were present in the meeting Duration of meeting 3 hours Observations Please record your observations during the meeting, Did the meeting go smoothly? Were there any disputes amongst the participants? If yes, please explain. Where there any concerns raised by the participants? If yes, please explain. Any other observations.  The meeting went smoothly. The Team of NELSAP together with ARTELIA supervisors have given enough information about the project. They explained the scheme to be used which is “Run of River Scheme “and how the impact will be reduced by adopting this Run of River Scheme. This was the good news for the people who will lose the big part of their land.  The People, who will be affected by the project, are those who cultivate in Marshland.  Participants asked different questions: How much money they will be given? When and how the money will be given to them?  For those who possess only the marshland, their important concern is to get another land which is suitable for cultivation.  Some people (old men) failed to estimate their land; they were helped by their neighbours.  Number of participants:57  Among 57 participants, 10 were women headed households.  Number of households by SNC:4 Households  New number of households: 57 Households  The number increased from 4 to 57  The Total area cultivated in (Ha): 65.77 Ha  Marshland area cultivated in (Ha):26.52 ha. 4/57 Households depend entirely on Marshland production. For the female heads of households in the list of marshland users, did they all come to the meeting or were they represented by male household members? All female heads of households came to the meeting. Others are on the additional list Name and signature of rapporteur: MBABAZI Janinah,Paul SSEGAWA(NELSAP)& ISHIMWE Armand village name and village number (SNC ID) 154 NYAKABUNGO date of village consultation 14th November 2012 Interview on table with village chief completed  YES Village chief: SINIBAGIWE Jean Baptiste Consultation meeting Number of participants 28 Paticipants were presents in the meeting Duration of meeting 2 Hours Observations Please record your observations during the meeting, Did the meeting go smoothly? Were there any disputes amongst the participants? If yes, please explain. Where there any concerns raised by the participants? If yes, please explain. Any other observations.  The meeting went smoothly. The Team of NELSAP together with ARTELIA supervisors have given enough information about the project. They explained the scheme to be used which is “Run of River Scheme “and how the impact will be reduced by adopting this Run of River Scheme. This was the good news for the people who will lose the big part of their land.  The People, who will be affected by the project, are those who cultivate in Marshland.  Few Households cultivate the Marshland.  Participants asked different questions: How much money they will be given? When and how the money will be given to them?  For those who possess only the marshland, their important concern is to get another land which is suitable for cultivation.  Number of participants:28  Among 28 participants, 6 were women headed households.  Number of households by SNC:5 Households  New number of households: 28 Households  The number increased from 5 to 28  The Total area cultivated in (Ha): 22.71 Ha  Marshland area cultivated in (Ha):4.33 ha. 3/28 Households depend entirely on Marshland production For the female heads of households in the list of marshland users, did they all come to the meeting or were they represented by male household members? All female heads of households came to the meeting. Others are on the additional list. Name and signature of rapporteur: GATETE William (NELSAP)& Niragire Henriette(Artelia). village name and village number (SNC ID) 153 NYAKWISI date of village consultation :14th November 2012 Interview on table with village chief completed  YES Village chief: MUHAYIMANA Pierre Consultation meeting Number of participants 92 Participants Duration of meeting 3hours Observations Please record your observations during the meeting, Did the meeting go smoothly? Were there any disputes amongst the participants? If yes, please explain. Where there any concerns raised by the participants? If yes, please explain. Any other observations.  The meeting went smoothly. The Team of NELSAP together with ARTELIA supervisors have given enough information about the project. They explained the scheme to be used which is “Run of River Scheme “and how the impact will be reduced by adopting this Run of River Scheme. This was the good news for the people who will lose the big part of their land.  The People, who will be affected by the project, are those who cultivate in Marshland.  Good organization at village level.  Participants asked different questions: How much money they will be given? When and how the money will be given to them?  For those who possess only the marshland, their important concern is to get another land which is suitable for cultivation.  Some people (old men) failed to estimate their land; they were helped by their neighbours.  Number of participants:92  Among 92 participants, 30 were women headed households.  Number of households by SNC:15 Households  New number of households: 92 Households  The number increased from 15 to 92  The Total area cultivated in (Ha): 99.29 Ha  Marshland area cultivated in (Ha):37.33 ha. 11/92 Households depend entirely on Marshland production. For the female heads of households in the list of marshland users, did they all come to the meeting or were they represented by male household members? All female heads of households came to the meeting. Others are on the additional list Name and signature of rapporteur: MBABAZI Janinah Paul SSEGAWA(NELSAP) &ISHIMWE Armand village name and village number (SNC ID) 156 RUHUHA date of village consultation 14th November 2012 Interview on table with village chief completed  YES Village Chief :RWISUMBURA Aliezere Consultation meeting Number of participants 134 Participants were presents in the meeting Duration of meeting 4 Hours Observations Please record your observations during the meeting, Did the meeting go smoothly? Were there any disputes amongst the participants? If yes, please explain. Where there any concerns raised by the participants? If yes, please explain. Any other observations.  The meeting went smoothly. The Team of NELSAP together with ARTELIA supervisors have given enough information about the project. They explained the scheme to be used which is “Run of River Scheme “and how the impact will be reduced by adopting this Run of River Scheme. This was the good news for the people who will lose the big part of their land.  The People, who will be affected by the project, are those who cultivate in Marshland.  Cultivated Marshland area is small comparing to the total cultivated area.  Participants asked different questions: How much money they will be given? When and how the money will be given to them?  For those who possess only the marshland, their important concern is to get another land which is suitable for cultivation.  Number of participants:134  Among 134 participants, 42 were women headed households.  Number of households by SNC:65 Households  New number of households: 134 Households  The number increased from 65 to 134  The Total area cultivated in (Ha): 100.54 Ha  Marshland area cultivated in (Ha):18.1 ha. 2/134 Households depend entirely on Marshland production For the female heads of households in the list of marshland users, did they all come to the meeting or were they represented by male household members? All female heads of households came to the meeting. Others are on the additional list. Name and signature of rapporteur: GATETE William(NELSAP)&NIRAGIRE Henriette(Artelia). village name and village number (SNC ID) 152 WEST RUSUMO date of village consultation 14th Nov.2012 Interview on table with village chief completed YES Village chief: MUNYANTARAMA Alphonse Consultation meeting Number of participants 64 participants were present in the meeting Duration of meeting 3 hours Observations Please record your observations during the meeting, Did the meeting go smoothly? Were there any disputes amongst the participants? If yes, please explain. Where there any concerns raised by the participants? If yes, please explain. Any other observations.  The meeting went smoothly. The Team of NELSAP together with ARTELIA supervisors have given enough information about the project. They explained the scheme to be used which is “Run of River Scheme “and how the impact will be reduced by adopting this Run of River Scheme. This was the good news for the people who will lose the big part of their land.  The People, who will be affected by the project, are those who cultivate in Marshland.  Participants asked different questions: How much money they will be given? When and how the money will be given to them?  For those who possess only the marshland, their important concern is to get another land which is suitable for cultivation.  Some people (old men) failed to estimate their land; they were helped by their neighbours.  Number of participants:64  Among 64 participants, 12 were women headed households.  Number of households by SNC:29 Households  New number of households: 64 Households  The number increased from 29 to 64  The Total area cultivated in (Ha):42.68 ha  Marshland area cultivated in (Ha):16.24 ha. 8/64 Households depend entirely on Marshland production. For the female heads of households in the list of marshland users, did they all come to the meeting or were they represented by male household members? All female heads of households came to the meeting. Others are on the additional list Name and signature of rapporteur: MBABAZI Janinah,Paul SSEGAWA & ISHIMWE Armand Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee Interview with village resettlement committee Name of Village EAST RUSUMO No. of village (SNC ID) 151 Date of Interview 14th Nov.2012 Name of interviewer ISHIMWE Armand Paul SSEGAWA Participants 15 (members of resettlement committee) Participants 1 NDARUHUTSE Emmanuel(Village Chief) (members of the resettlement 2 YANKURIJE Adeline committee) 3 NSENGIYUMVA Safari 4 MUKARUMANZI Marie Goretti 5 NTAGOZERA Eugene 6 Would you please tell us about the total size of marshland which is cultivated by the people in your village? About 50,600 m² What is the portion of cultivated marshland in your village in the total of the cultivated land? About % If it is difficult to tell the percentage: Less than a quarter of the total land is marshland √ About a quarter of the total land is marshland  About half of the total land is marshland  About three quarters of the total land is marshland  Almost all of the cultivated land is marshland  All the land we cultivate is marshland  1 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee What are the most important annual crops that people in your village cultivate on the marshland? Tomatoes, Maize, Beans, Irish Potatoes Could you also tell us about the yield per m2 of the most frequent crops for a normal year? Most important season crops yield per m2 in a good year (kg) 1.Tomatoes 0.8 2.Maize 0.2 3.Beans 0.1 4.Irish Potatoes 1.2 Could you please tell us, how the people in your village use the production from the marshland? People use marshland production fully for household o consumption In our village Less than a quarter of the marshland users sell products on o the market About a quarter of the marshland users sell products on the o market o About half of the marshland users sell products on the market About three quarters of the of the marshland users sell √ products on the market o Almost all of the marshland users sell products on the market o All the marshland users sell products on the market For the people in your village, who sell marshland products on the market, what would be the usual range of cash income from the market sale in a good year? Cash income from marshland product sale is between 200,000 and 3,000,000 RWF per year Does it happen that the marshland cannot be cultivated, because it dries out too slow? 2 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee No, this does never happen  Yes, it happens Once in 2 years √ Once in 5 years  Once in 10 years  very seldom  In a year where there is no harvest from marshland, how do people manage the situation? People have to Loss of harvest from purchase more People have to borrow marshland is not a products in the cash to manage the loss serious problem for market than in a of production normal year Less than a quarter of the Less than a quarter of Less than a quarter of the users the users users A quarter of the users A quarter of the users A quarter of the users Half of the users Half of the users Half of the users Three quarters of the Three quarters of the Three quarters of the users users users Almost all users Almost all users Almost all users 3 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee Other statements on the management of loss of marshland production, please explain: For those who possess the Marshland only,they cultivate for those who have the big dry land and they share the harvest; They rent land to cultivate; some of them have to purchase in the market. Are there people in your village, for whom the production from marshland is of special importance? If yes, please explain, who these people are and why marshland production is so important for them : For the households who have only the marshland cultivable and they don't possess the dry land, they are fully dependant on the production from the marshland. Are there people in your village, whose agricultural production depends entirely on marshland production? If yes, how many households fully depend on marshland production? 3 households over 12 households depend exclusively on the production from the marshland. From the households in your village fully depending on marshland, how many are women headed households`? 1 widow is fully depending on the production from the marshland. Does it ever happen that your permanent crops outside the marshland are flooded? No, this does never happen  Yes, it happens Once in 2 years √ Once in 5 years  Once in 10 years  very seldom  is there still spare cultivatable marshland available in your community (area in m2). there is the remaing part of marshaland which is not cultivated,but there is no specific dimension for that part of the marshland.Note that, it requires a lot of energy to prepare marshaland for cultivation. 4 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee What tdoes the committee think is an adequate compensation for those farming households who lose access to marshland and who entirely rely on marshland : they wish the compansation fees will allow them to invest in different sectors(buy other land, farming, credit and savings. Can you think of any special assistance maeasures to be provided for those affectd households who are part of a vulneralbe group? (women headed households, child headed households or other vulnerable HH) they need special assistance to get another land,Transfer the compensation fees through the microfinance institution for saving and access to credit (SACCO,Popular Bank of Rwanda,etc.),Provide trainings in small and big businesses generating profit. Thank you very much for your support! Signature of participants NDARUHUTSE Emmanuel(Village Chief) YANKURIJE Adeline NSENGIYUMVA Safari MUKARUMANZI Marie Goretti NTAGOZERA Eugene 5 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee Interview with village resettlement committee Name of Village No. of village (SNC ID) WEST RUSUMO 152 Date of Interview 14th Nov. 2012 Name of interviewer NIRAGIRE Henriette GATETE William Participants 64 (members of resettlement committee) Participants 1 MUNYANTARAMA Alphonse(Village Chief) (members of the resettlement 2 BYAMUNGU Innocent committee) 3 NGENDAHAYO Jean Paul 4 MUKAGASANA Chantal 5 KAMAGANWA Josephine 6 Would you please tell us about the total size of marshland which is cultivated by the people in your village? About 162,400 m² What is the portion of cultivated marshland in your village in the total of the cultivated land? About % If it is difficult to tell the percentage: Less than a quarter of the total land is marshland √ About a quarter of the total land is marshland  About half of the total land is marshland  About three quarters of the total land is marshland  Almost all of the cultivated land is marshland  All the land we cultivate is marshland  1 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee What are the most important annual crops that people in your village cultivate on the marshland? Tomatoes,Maize, beans, Irish Potatoes Could you also tell us about the yield per m2 of the most frequent crops for a normal year? Most important season crops yield per m2 in a good year (kg) 1.Tomatoes 0.8 2.Maize 0.2 3.Beans 0.1 4.Irish Potatoes 1.2 Could you please tell us, how the people in your village use the production from the marshland? People use marshland production fully for household o consumption In our village Less than a quarter of the marshland users sell products on o the market About a quarter of the marshland users sell products on the o market o About half of the marshland users sell products on the market About three quarters of the of the marshland users sell √ products on the market o Almost all of the marshland users sell products on the market o All the marshland users sell products on the market For the people in your village, who sell marshland products on the market, what would be the usual range of cash income from the market sale in a good year? Cash income from marshland product sale is between 200,000 and 3,000,000 RWF per year 2 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee Does it happen that the marshland cannot be cultivated, because it dries out too slow? No, this does never happen  Yes, it happens Once in 2 years √ Once in 5 years  Once in 10 years  very seldom  In a year where there is no harvest from marshland, how do people manage the situation? People have to Loss of harvest from purchase more People have to borrow marshland is not a products in the cash to manage the loss serious problem for market than in a of production normal year Less than a quarter of the Less than a quarter of Less than a quarter of the users the users users A quarter of the users A quarter of the users A quarter of the users Half of the users Half of the users Half of the users Three quarters of the Three quarters of the Three quarters of the users users users Almost all users Almost all users Almost all users 3 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee Other statements on the management of loss of marshland production, please explain: For those who possess the Marshland only,they cultivate for those who have the big dry land and they share the harvest; They rent land to cultivate; some of them have to purchase in the market. Are there people in your village, for whom the production from marshland is of special importance? If yes, please explain, who these people are and why marshland production is so important for them For the households who have only the marshland cultivable and they don't possess the dry land, they are fully dependant on the production from the marshland. Are there people in your village, whose agricultural production depends entirely on marshland production? If yes, how many households fully depend on marshland production? 8 households over 77 households depend exclusively on the production from the marshland. From the households in your village fully depending on marshland, how many are women headed households`? 3 widows are fully depending on the production from the marshland. Does it ever happen that your permanent crops outside the marshland are flooded? No, this does never happen  Yes, it happens Once in 2 years √ Once in 5 years  Once in 10 years  very seldom  is there still spare cultivatable marshland available in your community (area in m2). there is the remaing part of marshaland which is not cultivated,but there is no specific dimension for that part of the marshland.Note that, it requires a lot of energy to prepare marshaland for cultivation. What tdoes the committee think is an adequate compensation for those farming households who lose access to marshland and who entirely rely on marshland : they wish the compansation fees will allow them to invest in different sectors(buy other land, farming, credit and savings. 4 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee Can you think of any special assistance maeasures to be provided for those affectd households who are part of a vulneralbe group? (women headed households, child headed households or other vulnerable HH) they need special assistance to get another land,Transfer the compensation fees through the microfinance institution for saving and access to credit (SACCO,Popular Bank of Rwanda,etc.),Provide trainings in small and big businesses generating profit. Thank you very much for your support! Signature of participants MUNYANTARAMA Alphonse(Village Chief) BYAMUNGU Innocent NGENDAHAYO Jean Paul MUKAGASANA Chantal KAMAGANWA Josephine 5 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee Interview with village resettlement committee Name of Village NSHUNGEREZI No. of village (SNC ID) 155 Date of Interview 14th Nov. 2012 Name of interviewer NIRAGIRE Henriette GATETE William Participants 57 (members of resettlement committee) Participants 1 SEMURYANGO Raphael(Village chief) (members of the resettlement 2 MUKAMANA Jacqueline committee) 3 GAHAMANYI Gaspard 4 UWIMANA Cecile 5 NYIRAHABIMANA Rose 6 Would you please tell us about the total size of marshland which is cultivated by the people in your village? About 265,200 m² What is the portion of cultivated marshland in your village in the total of the cultivated land? About % If it is difficult to tell the percentage: Less than a quarter of the total land is marshland √ About a quarter of the total land is marshland  About half of the total land is marshland  About three quarters of the total land is marshland  Almost all of the cultivated land is marshland  All the land we cultivate is marshland  1 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee What are the most important annual crops that people in your village cultivate on the marshland? T omatoes, Maize,Soja,Beans Could you also tell us about the yield per m2 of the most frequent crops for a normal year? Most important season crops yield per m2 in a good year (kg) 1.Tomatoes 0.8 2.Maize 0.2 3.Soja 0.1 4.Beans 0.1 Could you please tell us, how the people in your village use the production from the marshland? People use marshland production fully for household o consumption In our village Less than a quarter of the marshland users sell products on o the market About a quarter of the marshland users sell products on the o market o About half of the marshland users sell products on the market About three quarters of the of the marshland users sell √ products on the market o Almost all of the marshland users sell products on the market o All the marshland users sell products on the market For the people in your village, who sell marshland products on the market, what would be the usual range of cash income from the market sale in a good year? Cash income from marshland product sale is between 200,000 and 3,000,000 RWF per year 2 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee Does it happen that the marshland cannot be cultivated, because it dries out too slow? No, this does never happen  Yes, it happens Once in 2 years √ Once in 5 years  Once in 10 years  very seldom  In a year where there is no harvest from marshland, how do people manage the situation? People have to Loss of harvest from purchase more People have to borrow marshland is not a products in the cash to manage the loss serious problem for market than in a of production normal year Less than a quarter of the Less than a quarter of Less than a quarter of the users the users users A quarter of the users A quarter of the users A quarter of the users Half of the users Half of the users Half of the users Three quarters of the Three quarters of the Three quarters of the users users users Almost all users Almost all users Almost all users 3 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee Other statements on the management of loss of marshland production, please explain: For those who possess the Marshland only,they cultivate for those who have the big dry land and they share the harvest; They rent land to cultivate; some of them have to purchase in the market. Are there people in your village, for whom the production from marshland is of special importance? If yes, please explain, who these people are and why marshland production is so important for them For the households who have only the marshland cultivable and they don't possess the dry land, they are fully dependant on the production from the marshland Are there people in your village, whose agricultural production depends entirely on marshland production? If yes, how many households fully depend on marshland production? 4 households over 57 households depend exclusively on the production from the marshland. From the households in your village fully depending on marshland, how many are women headed households`? 1widow is fully depending on the production from the marshland. Does it ever happen that your permanent crops outside the marshland are flooded? No, this does never happen  Yes, it happens Once in 2 years √ Once in 5 years  Once in 10 years  very seldom  is there still spare cultivatable marshland available in your community (area in m2). there is the remaing part of marshaland which is not cultivated,but there is no specific dimension for that part of the marshland.Note that, it requires a lot of energy to prepare marshaland for cultivation. 4 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee What tdoes the committee think is an adequate compensation for those farming households who lose access to marshland and who entirely rely on marshland they wish the compansation fees will allow them to invest in different sectors(buy other land, farming, credit and savings. Can you think of any special assistance maeasures to be provided for those affectd households who are part of a vulneralbe group? (women headed households, child headed households or other vulnerable HH) they need special assistance to get another land,Transfer the compensation fees through the microfinance institution for saving and access to credit (SACCO,Popular Bank of Rwanda,etc.),Provide trainings in small and big businesses generating profit. Thank you very much for your support! Signature of participants SEMURYANGO Raphael(Village chief) MUKAMANA Jacqueline GAHAMANYI Gaspard UWIMANA Cecile NYIRAHABIMANA Rose 5 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee Interview with village resettlement committee Name of Village NYAKABUNGO No. of village (SNC ID) 154 Date of Interview 14th Nov.2012 Name of interviewer ISHIMWE Armand MBABAZI Janinah Participants 28 (members of resettlement committee) Participants 1 SINIBAGIWE Jean Baptiste(Village Chief) (members of the resettlement 2 NTANKUMI Therese committee) 3 NSHIMIYIMANA Gaspard 4 MUKANOHELI Violette 5 NYANGEZI Jean Pierre 6 Would you please tell us about the total size of marshland which is cultivated by the people in your village? About 43,300 m² What is the portion of cultivated marshland in your village in the total of the cultivated land? About % If it is difficult to tell the percentage: Less than a quarter of the total land is marshland √ About a quarter of the total land is marshland  About half of the total land is marshland  About three quarters of the total land is marshland  Almost all of the cultivated land is marshland  All the land we cultivate is marshland  1 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee What are the most important annual crops that people in your village cultivate on the marshland? Tomatoes,Irish Potatoes,Cabbages, Beans Could you also tell us about the yield per m2 of the most frequent crops for a normal year? Most important season crops yield per m2 in a good year (kg) 1.Tomatoes 0.8 2.Irish Potatoes 1.2 3.Cabbages 1.2 4.Beans 0.1 Could you please tell us, how the people in your village use the production from the marshland? People use marshland production fully for household o consumption In our village Less than a quarter of the marshland users sell products on o the market About a quarter of the marshland users sell products on the o market o About half of the marshland users sell products on the market About three quarters of the of the marshland users sell √ products on the market o Almost all of the marshland users sell products on the market All the marshland users sell products on the market o For the people in your village, who sell marshland products on the market, what would be the usual range of cash income from the market sale in a good year? Cash income from marshland product sale is between 200,000 and 3,000,000 RWF per year Does it happen that the marshland cannot be cultivated, because it dries out too slow? 2 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee No, this does never happen  Yes, it happens Once in 2 years √ Once in 5 years  Once in 10 years  very seldom  In a year where there is no harvest from marshland, how do people manage the situation? People have to Loss of harvest from purchase more People have to borrow marshland is not a products in the cash to manage the loss serious problem for market than in a of production normal year Less than a quarter of the Less than a quarter of the Less than a quarter of the users users users A quarter of the users A quarter of the users A quarter of the users Half of the users Half of the users Half of the users Three quarters of the Three quarters of the Three quarters of the users users users Almost all users Almost all users Almost all users 3 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee Other statements on the management of loss of marshland production, please explain: For those who possess the Marshland only,they cultivate for those who have the big dry land and they share the harvest; They rent land to cultivate; some of them have to purchase in the market. Are there people in your village, for whom the production from marshland is of special importance? If yes, please explain, who these people are and why marshland production is so important for them : For the households who have only the marshland cultivable and they don't possess the dry land, they are fully dependant on the production from the marshland Are there people in your village, whose agricultural production depends entirely on marshland production? If yes, how many households fully depend on marshland production? 3 households over 28 households depend exclusively on the production from the marshland. From the households in your village fully depending on marshland, how many are women headed households`? No women who is fully depending on the production from the marshland Does it ever happen that your permanent crops outside the marshland are flooded? No, this does never happen  Yes, it happens Once in 2 years √ Once in 5 years  Once in 10 years  very seldom  is there still spare cultivatable marshland available in your community (area in m2). there is the remaing part of marshaland which is not cultivated,but there is no specific dimension for that part of the marshland.Note that, it requires a lot of energy to prepare marshaland for cultivation. What tdoes the committee think is an adequate compensation for those farming households who lose access to marshland and who entirely rely on marshland : they wish the compansation fees will allow them to invest in different sectors(buy other land, farming, credit and savings. 4 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee Can you think of any special assistance maeasures to be provided for those affectd households who are part of a vulneralbe group? (women headed households, child headed households or other vulnerable HH) they need special assistance to get another land,Transfer the compensation fees through the microfinance institution for saving and access to credit (SACCO,Popular Bank of Rwanda,etc.),Provide trainings in small and big businesses generating profit. Thank you very much for your support! Signature of participants SINIBAGIWE Jean Baptiste(Village Chief) NTANKUMI Therese NSHIMIYIMANA Gaspard MUKANOHELI Violette NYANGEZI Jean Pierre 5 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee Interview with village resettlement committee Name of Village NYAKIZIBA No. of village (SNC ID) Date of Interview 20th Name of interviewer ISHIMWE Armand MBABAZI Janinah Paul SSEGAWA Participants 355 Participants in the 4 sub-villages (members of resettlement committee) Participants 1 MUKIZA Salomoni BYAMUNGU(Chief) (members of the resettlement 2 Charles KANANI(Village executif) committee) 3 MANASE KABILIGI 4 5 6 Would you please tell us about the total size of marshland which is cultivated by the people in your village? About 2,819,000 m² What is the portion of cultivated marshland in your village in the total of the cultivated land? About % If it is difficult to tell the percentage: Less than a quarter of the total land is marshland √ About a quarter of the total land is marshland  About half of the total land is marshland  About three quarters of the total land is marshland  Almost all of the cultivated land is marshland  All the land we cultivate is marshland  1 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee What are the most important annual crops that people in your village cultivate on the marshland? Maize, Irish Potatoes, beans, sweet potatoes Could you also tell us about the yield per m2 of the most frequent crops for a normal year? Most important season crops yield per m2 in a good year (kg) 1.Maize 0.2 2.Irish Potatoes 1.2 3.Beans 0.1 4.Sweet potatoes 0.9 Could you please tell us, how the people in your village use the production from the marshland? People use marshland production fully for household o consumption In our village Less than a quarter of the marshland users sell products on o the market About a quarter of the marshland users sell products on the o market o About half of the marshland users sell products on the market About three quarters of the of the marshland users sell o products on the market √ Almost all of the marshland users sell products on the market All the marshland users sell products on the market o For the people in your village, who sell marshland products on the market, what would be the usual range of cash income from the market sale in a good year? Cash income from marshland product sale is between 200,000 and 3,000,000 RWF per year Does it happen that the marshland cannot be cultivated, because it dries out too slow? 2 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee No, this does never happen  Yes, it happens Once in 2 years √ Once in 5 years  Once in 10 years  very seldom  In a year where there is no harvest from marshland, how do people manage the situation? People have to Loss of harvest from purchase more People have to borrow marshland is not a products in the cash to manage the loss serious problem for market than in a of production normal year Less than a quarter of the Less than a quarter of the Less than a quarter of the users users users A quarter of the users A quarter of the users A quarter of the users Half of the users Half of the users Half of the users Three quarters of the Three quarters of the Three quarters of the users users users Almost all users Almost all users Almost all users 3 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee Other statements on the management of loss of marshland production, please explain: They cultivate the uphill land,they have large land uphill side. We noticed that for those who possess the Marshland only, they are Young Boys and girls ,and they will receive heritage from their parents. Are there people in your village, for whom the production from marshland is of special importance? If yes, please explain, who these people are and why marshland production is so important for them : The prodution from the Marshland has the same importance to the all users. Are there people in your village, whose agricultural production depends entirely on marshland production? If yes, how many households fully depend on marshland production? Young Boys and Girls who have got their own Marshland 18/355in five Sub-Villages of NYAKIZIBA Village. From the households in your village fully depending on marshland, how many are women headed households`? No woman Does it ever happen that your permanent crops outside the marshland are flooded? No, this does never happen  Yes, it happens Once in 2 years √ Once in 5 years  Once in 10 years  very seldom  is there still spare cultivatable marshland available in your community (area in m2). There is the remaing part of marshaland which is not cultivated,but there is no specific dimension for that part of the marshland.Note that, it requires a lot of energy to prepare marshaland for cultivation. 4 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee What tdoes the committee think is an adequate compensation for those farming households who lose access to marshland and who entirely rely on marshland : They want money to invest in different sectors, farming,small businesses,etc Can you think of any special assistance maeasures to be provided for those affectd households who are part of a vulneralbe group? (women headed households, child headed households or other vulnerable HH) Provide trainings in small and big businesses generating profit,Share capital to start the small businesses. Thank you very much for your support! Signature of participants MUKIZA Salomoni BYAMUNGU(Chief) Charles KANANI(Village executif) MANASE KABILIGI 5 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee Interview with village resettlement committee Name of Village No. of village (SNC ID) NYAKWISI 153 Date of Interview 14 Nov.2012 Name of interviewer Participants 92 (members of resettlement committee) Participants 1 MUHAYIMANA Pierre(Village chief) (members of the resettlement 2 AHISHAKIYE Jeannette committee) 3 KAMANZI Alphonse 4 RUTEBUKA Jean de Dieu 5 GASANA Paul 6 Would you please tell us about the total size of marshland which is cultivated by the people in your village? About 373,300 m² What is the portion of cultivated marshland in your village in the total of the cultivated land? About % If it is difficult to tell the percentage: Less than a quarter of the total land is marshland √ About a quarter of the total land is marshland  About half of the total land is marshland  About three quarters of the total land is marshland  Almost all of the cultivated land is marshland  All the land we cultivate is marshland  1 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee What are the most important annual crops that people in your village cultivate on the marshland? Tomatoes,beans,Cabbages,Maize Could you also tell us about the yield per m2 of the most frequent crops for a normal year? Most important season crops yield per m2 in a good year (kg) 1.Tomatoes 0.8 2.Beans 0.1 3.Cabbages 1.2 4.Maize 0.2 Could you please tell us, how the people in your village use the production from the marshland? People use marshland production fully for household o consumption In our village Less than a quarter of the marshland users sell products on o the market About a quarter of the marshland users sell products on the o market o About half of the marshland users sell products on the market About three quarters of the of the marshland users sell √ products on the market o Almost all of the marshland users sell products on the market o All the marshland users sell products on the market For the people in your village, who sell marshland products on the market, what would be the usual range of cash income from the market sale in a good year? Cash income from marshland product sale is between 200,000 and 3,000,000 RWF per year 2 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee Does it happen that the marshland cannot be cultivated, because it dries out too slow? No, this does never happen  Yes, it happens Once in 2 years √ Once in 5 years  Once in 10 years  very seldom  In a year where there is no harvest from marshland, how do people manage the situation? People have to Loss of harvest from purchase more People have to borrow marshland is not a products in the cash to manage the loss serious problem for market than in a of production normal year Less than a quarter of the Less than a quarter of Less than a quarter of the users the users users A quarter of the users A quarter of the users A quarter of the users Half of the users Half of the users Half of the users Three quarters of the Three quarters of the Three quarters of the users users users Almost all users Almost all users Almost all users 3 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee Other statements on the management of loss of marshland production, please explain: For those who possess the Marshland only,they cultivate for those who have the big dry land and they share the harvest; They rent land to cultivate; some of them have to purchase in the market. Are there people in your village, for whom the production from marshland is of special importance? If yes, please explain, who these people are and why marshland production is so important for them : For the households who have only the marshland cultivable and they don't possess the dry land, they are fully dependant on the production from the marshland. Are there people in your village, whose agricultural production depends entirely on marshland production? If yes, how many households fully depend on marshland production? 11 households over 96 households depend exclusively on the production from the marshland. From the households in your village fully depending on marshland, how many are women headed households`? 3 widows are fully depending on the production from the marshland. Does it ever happen that your permanent crops outside the marshland are flooded? No, this does never happen  Yes, it happens Once in 2 years √ Once in 5 years  Once in 10 years  very seldom  is there still spare cultivatable marshland available in your community (area in m2). there is the remaing part of marshaland which is not cultivated,but there is no specific dimension for that part of the marshland.Note that, it requires a lot of energy to prepare marshaland for cultivation. 4 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee What tdoes the committee think is an adequate compensation for those farming households who lose access to marshland and who entirely rely on marshland : they wish the compansation fees will allow them to invest in different sectors(buy other land, farming, credit and savings. Can you think of any special assistance maeasures to be provided for those affectd households who are part of a vulneralbe group? (women headed households, child headed households or other vulnerable HH) : they need special assistance to get another land,Transfer the compensation fees through the microfinance institution for saving and access to credit (SACCO,Popular Bank of Rwanda,etc.),Provide trainings in small and big businesses generating profit. Thank you very much for your support! Signature of participants MUHAYIMANA Pierre(Village chief) AHISHAKIYE Jeannette KAMANZI Alphonse RUTEBUKA Jean de Dieu GASANA Paul 5 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee Interview with village resettlement committee Name of Village RUHUHA No. of village (SNC ID) 156 Date of Interview 14th Nov.2012 Name of interviewer NIRAGIRE Henriette GATETE William Participants 134 (members of resettlement committee) Participants 1 RWISUMBURA Aliezere(Village chief) (members of the resettlement 2 UKIZEMWABO Papias committee) 3 MUKANTABANA Regina 4 DUKUZEMUNGU Marie Claire 5 AKIMANA Venantia 6 Would you please tell us about the total size of marshland which is cultivated by the people in your village? About 181,000 m² What is the portion of cultivated marshland in your village in the total of the cultivated land? About % If it is difficult to tell the percentage: Less than a quarter of the total land is marshland √ About a quarter of the total land is marshland  About half of the total land is marshland  About three quarters of the total land is marshland  Almost all of the cultivated land is marshland  All the land we cultivate is marshland  1 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee What are the most important annual crops that people in your village cultivate on the marshland? Irish Potatoes,Tomatoes,Soja,Cabbages Could you also tell us about the yield per m2 of the most frequent crops for a normal year? Most important season crops yield per m2 in a good year (kg) 1.Irish Potatoes 1.2 2.Tomatoes 0.8 3.Soja 0.1 4.Cabbages 1.2 Could you please tell us, how the people in your village use the production from the marshland? People use marshland production fully for household o consumption In our village Less than a quarter of the marshland users sell products on o the market About a quarter of the marshland users sell products on the o market o About half of the marshland users sell products on the market About three quarters of the of the marshland users sell √ products on the market o Almost all of the marshland users sell products on the market o All the marshland users sell products on the market For the people in your village, who sell marshland products on the market, what would be the usual range of cash income from the market sale in a good year? Cash income from marshland product sale is between 200,000 and 3,000,000 RWF per year 2 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee Does it happen that the marshland cannot be cultivated, because it dries out too slow? No, this does never happen  Yes, it happens Once in 2 years √ Once in 5 years  Once in 10 years  very seldom  In a year where there is no harvest from marshland, how do people manage the situation? People have to Loss of harvest from purchase more People have to borrow marshland is not a products in the cash to manage the loss serious problem for market than in a of production normal year Less than a quarter of the Less than a quarter of the Less than a quarter of the users users users A quarter of the users A quarter of the users A quarter of the users Half of the users Half of the users Half of the users Three quarters of the Three quarters of the Three quarters of the users users users Almost all users Almost all users Almost all users 3 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee Other statements on the management of loss of marshland production, please explain: For those who possess the Marshland only,they cultivate for those who have the big dry land and they share the harvest; They rent land to cultivate; some of them have to purchase in the market. Are there people in your village, for whom the production from marshland is of special importance? If yes, please explain, who these people are and why marshland production is so important for them : For the households who have only the marshland cultivable and they don't possess the dry land, they are fully dependant on the production from the marshland Are there people in your village, whose agricultural production depends entirely on marshland production? If yes, how many households fully depend on marshland production? 2 households over 132 households depend exclusively on the production from the marshland. From the households in your village fully depending on marshland, how many are women headed households`? 1 widow is fully depending on the production from the marshland. Does it ever happen that your permanent crops outside the marshland are flooded? No, this does never happen  Yes, it happens Once in 2 years √ Once in 5 years  Once in 10 years  very seldom  is there still spare cultivatable marshland available in your community (area in m2). there is the remaing part of marshaland which is not cultivated,but there is no specific dimension for that part of the marshland.Note that, it requires a lot of energy to prepare marshaland for cultivation. 4 Self-validation in affected villages: key informant interview with resettlement committee What tdoes the committee think is an adequate compensation for those farming households who lose access to marshland and who entirely rely on marshland : they wish the compansation fees will allow them to invest in different sectors(buy other land, farming, credit and savings. Can you think of any special assistance maeasures to be provided for those affectd households who are part of a vulneralbe group? (women headed households, child headed households or other vulnerable HH): they need special assistance to get another land,Transfer the compensation fees through the microfinance institution for saving and access to credit (SACCO,Popular Bank of Rwanda,etc.),Provide trainings in small and big businesses generating profit. Thank you very much for your support! Signature of participants RWISUMBURA Aliezere(Village chief) UKIZEMWABO Papias MUKANTABANA Regina DUKUZEMUNGU Marie Claire AKIMANA Venantia 5 For the female heads of households in the list of marshland users, did they all come to the meeting or were they represented by male household members? female heads of households came to the meeting. Others are on the additional list. Name and signature of rapporteur: Paul SSEGAWA,MBABAZI Janinah(NELSAP)& ISHIMWE Armand(Artelia). RUSUMO FALLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT DAM & POWERPLANT COMPONENT R ESE TTLEM EN T AC TI ON PL AN ( R AP ) APPENDIX 3 MARSHLAND USERS IN VILLAGES AFFECTED BY OPERATION Table on cultivated land per village East Rusumo Crops on Total area Marshland area HH No marshland, cultivated (ha) cultivated (ha) annual Chief Cell HH Chief HH HH 8 17 20 OO1 0.21 0.21 Tomatoes OO2 1.15 0.15 Tomatoes OO3 1.00 1.00 Tomatoes OO4 0.06 0.06 Tomatoes OO5 1.12 1.00 Tomatoes OO6 1.06 1.00 Tomatoes OO7 1.32 0.32 Tomatoes OO8 0.54 0.54 Maiz OO9 0.02 0.02 Beans O10 0.46 0.14 Irish potatoes O11 0.71 0.21 Beans O12 0.91 0.41 Beans Total 8.56 5.06 Comments Absent Absent Absent No land up hill No land up hill No land up hill No land up hill No land up hill Table on cultivate d land KABUYE Total area Marshland area Crops on HH No Comments cultivated (ha) cultivated (ha) marshland, annual Chief Cell HH Chief HH HH 1 1 0.5 Maiz 2 1.5 1 Sweet Potatoes 3 1 0.5 Sweet Potatoes 4 1 0.5 Sweet Potatoes 5 2 1 Sweet Potatoes 6 1.75 0.75 Sweet Potatoes 7 0.5 1.5 Tomatoes 8 1.5 1 Tomatoes 9 1.5 1 Sweet Potatoes 10 0.5 0.5 Sweet Potatoes No land up hill 11 2 0.5 Sweet Potatoes 12 2 0.5 Sweet Potatoes 13 1.5 0.5 Sweet Potatoes 14 1.5 1 Maiz 15 1.5 0.5 Maiz 16 1.5 0.5 Sweet Potatoes 17 1.5 0.5 Maiz 18 2 1 Sweet Potatoes 19 2.5 1 Maiz 20 2.5 1 Sweet Potatoes 21 1.5 0.5 Sweet Potatoes 22 2 1 Onions 23 2 0.5 Tomatoes 24 1.5 1 Sweet Potatoes TOTAL 37.75 18.25 Table on cultivate d land per village KYENDA Total area Marshland area Crops on marshland, HH No cultivated Comments cultivated (ha) annual (ha) Chief Cell HH Chief HH HH 1 2.02 0.02 Cabbages 2 2.20 0.70 Onions 3 1.00 0.50 Tomatoes 4 2.00 0.50 Cabbages 5 2.00 0.50 Tomatoes 6 1.25 0.75 Cabbages 7 1.50 0.50 Maiz 8 4.00 1.00 Beans 9 9.50 1.50 Irish Potatoes 10 1.75 0.75 Tomatoes 11 2.75 0.75 Beans 12 9.00 2.00 Beans 13 3.75 0.75 Beans 14 2.49 0.49 Beans 15 4.49 0.49 Tomatoes 16 1.50 0.50 Irish Potatoes 17 4.50 1.50 Tomatoes 18 3.50 0.50 Cabbages 19 4.21 0.21 Beans 20 1.50 0.50 Beans 21 2.75 0.21 Irish Potatoes 22 4.98 0.98 Beans 23 16.47 1.47 Rice 24 1.25 0.25 Irish Potatoes 25 3.74 0.74 Beans 26 1.49 0.49 Tomatoes 27 1.25 0.25 Tomatoes 28 2.99 0.49 Beans 29 14.40 3.40 Beans 30 3.49 0.49 Maiz 31 12.49 2.94 Onions 32 1.50 0.50 Maiz 33 4.50 0.50 Cabbages 34 6.50 1.50 Beans 35 1.50 0.50 Beans 36 7.50 0.50 Beans 37 4.50 0.50 Beans 38 0.75 0.25 Irish Potatoes 39 3.50 0.50 Irish Potatoes 40 3.50 0.50 Irish Potatoes 41 4.00 0.50 Irish Potatoes 42 2.50 0.50 Tomatoes 43 4.75 0.75 Sweet potatoes 44 6.00 1.00 Tomatoes 45 7.00 2.00 Tomatoes 46 2.00 2.00 Cabbages No land uphill 47 3.50 1.00 Beans 48 4.00 1.50 Beans 49 2.50 2.50 Tomatoes No land uphill 50 6.00 1.00 Beans 51 2.50 1.00 Beans 52 5.00 1.00 Beans 53 2.75 0.75 Tomatoes 54 2.25 0.75 Irish Potatoes 55 5.00 1.00 Sweet potatoes 56 6.00 1.00 Tomatoes 57 4.00 1.00 Irish Potatoes 58 5.50 1.50 Beans 59 5.00 1.00 Beans 60 1.50 0.50 Beans 61 3.00 1.50 Irish Potatoes 62 0.50 0.50 Beans No land uphill 63 2.25 0.75 Irish Potatoes 64 2.00 0.50 Irish Potatoes 65 2.00 0.50 Beans 66 3.00 4.00 Tomatoes TOTAL 258.46 61.37 Table on cultivated land per village Nshungeruzi Total area cultivated Marshland area Crops on marshland, HH No Comments (ha) cultivated (ha) annual Chief Cell HH Chief HH HH 6 0.45 55 0.99 0.54 Tomatoes 7 0.68 18 0.83 0.15 Tomatoes 11 1.00 21 1.26 0.26 Tomatoes 59 0.63 59 1.55 0.92 Tomatoes OO1 0.90 20 1.13 0.23 Tomatoes OO2 0.80 17 0.96 0.16 Maiz OO3 0.90 7 0.97 0.07 Maiz OO4 0.90 30 1.28 0.38 Soja OO5 0.50 60 1.25 0.75 Tomatoes OO6 0.90 46 1.66 0.76 Soja OO7 0.90 37 1.42 0.52 Maiz OO8 0.90 45 1.63 0.73 Soja OO9 0.70 54 1.51 0.81 Maiz O10 0.90 44 1.62 0.72 Soja O11 1.00 19 1.23 0.23 Maiz O12 1.00 46 1.85 0.85 Tomatoes O13 0.50 62 1.33 0.83 Maiz O14 0.00 100 0.05 0.05 Tomatoes No land up hill O15 0.90 8 0.98 0.08 Irish potatoes O16 0.90 20 1.13 0.23 Maiz O17 0.45 34 0.68 0.23 Tomatoes O18 0.90 20 1.13 0.23 Maiz Table on cultivated land per village Nshungeruzi Total area cultivated Marshland area Crops on marshland, HH No Comments (ha) cultivated (ha) annual Chief Cell HH Chief HH HH O19 0.50 43 0.87 0.37 Tomatoes O20 0.90 54 1.94 1.04 Maiz O21 0.75 19 0.93 0.18 Tomatoes O22 0.90 38 1.44 0.54 Tomatoes O23 0.90 30 1.29 0.39 Tomatoes O24 0.90 25 1.20 0.30 Tomatoes O25 0.46 39 0.76 0.30 Tomatoes O26 0.90 28 1.25 0.35 Tomatoes O27 0.90 41 1.52 0.62 Tomatoes O28 0.90 26 1.22 0.32 Tomatoes O29 0.90 28 1.25 0.35 Maiz O30 0.90 19 1.11 0.21 Beans O31 1.00 8 1.09 0.09 Tomatoes O32 0.90 43 1.58 0.68 Tomatoes O33 0.90 31 1.30 0.40 Tomatoes O34 0.30 72 1.07 0.78 Soja O35 0.60 30 0.86 0.26 Maiz O36 0.90 63 2.44 1.54 Tomatoes O37 1.00 73 3.77 2.77 Tomatoes O38 1.00 45 1.83 0.83 Irish potatoes O39 0.00 100 0.60 0.60 Tomatoes No land up hill O40 0.00 100 0.30 0.30 Tomatoes No land up hill O41 0.90 31 1.31 0.41 Maiz O42 0.90 35 1.38 0.48 Maiz Table on cultivated land per village Nshungeruzi Total area cultivated Marshland area Crops on marshland, HH No Comments (ha) cultivated (ha) annual Chief Cell HH Chief HH HH O43 0.65 24 0.86 0.21 Soja O44 0.00 99 0.23 0.23 Soja O45 0.32 26 0.43 0.11 Soja O46 0.00 100 0.10 0.10 Soja No land up hill O47 0.00 100 0.18 0.18 Soja No land up hill O48 0.60 25 0.80 0.20 Tomatoes O49 0.12 63 0.32 0.20 Tomatoes O50 0.45 38 0.73 0.28 Beans O51 0.40 56 0.90 0.50 Beans O52 0.90 27 1.23 0.33 Tomatoes O53 0.90 29 1.26 0.36 Maiz Total 65.77 26.52 2 of 57 6 of 57 Table on cultivated land per village Nyakabungo Total area cultivated Marshland area cultivated Crops on HH No Comments (ha) (ha) marshland, annual Chief Cell HH Chief HH HH 3 0.00 100 0.06 0.06 Soja No Land Uphill 14 1.13 31 1.63 0.50 Cabbages 17 0.89 10 0.99 0.10 Irish Potatoes 20 1.00 15 1.18 0.18 Tomatoes 30 1.00 11 1.12 0.12 Tomatoes OO1 0.90 3 0.92 0.02 Cabbages OO2 0.38 18 0.46 0.08 Sugarcane OO3 0.90 4 0.94 0.04 Cabbages OO4 0.12 50 0.24 0.12 Irish Potatoes OO5 0.90 29 1.26 0.36 Irish Potatoes OO6 0.90 2 0.92 0.02 Cabbages OO7 0.88 1 0.89 0.01 Irish Potatoes OO8 0.25 58 0.60 0.35 Potatoes OO9 0.90 31 1.30 0.40 Irish Potatoes O10 0.80 23 1.04 0.24 Irish Potatoes O11 0.43 36 0.67 0.24 Irish Potatoes O12 1.00 4 1.04 0.04 Irish Potatoes O13 0.00 100 0.03 0.03 Irish Potatoes No Land Uphill O14 1.03 41 1.74 0.71 Cabbages O15 1.00 12 1.14 0.14 Tomatoes O16 0.40 13 0.46 0.06 Tomatoes O17 0.54 13 0.62 0.08 Tomatoes Table on cultivated land per village Nyakabungo Total area cultivated Marshland area cultivated Crops on HH No Comments (ha) (ha) marshland, annual Chief Cell HH Chief HH HH O18 0.00 100 0.15 0.15 Tomatoes No land Uphill O19 0.15 44 0.27 0.12 Potatoes O20 0.59 3 0.60 0.02 Tomatoes O21 0.30 9 0.33 0.03 Beans O22 1.00 6 1.06 0.06 Potatoes O23 1.00 6 1.06 0.06 Potatoes Total 22.71 4.33 9 of 28 Table on cultivated land Nyakwisi per village Crops on Total area Marshland area HH No marshland, Comments cultivated (ha) cultivated (ha) annual Chief Cell HH Chief HH HH 10 1.00 2.00 1.00 Tomatoes 19 0.00 Absent 26 0.00 Absent 30 0.00 Absent 37 1.00 1.50 0.50 Tomatoes 45 1.00 2.60 1.60 Tomatoes 46 0.00 Absent 47 1.00 1.67 0.67 Maiz 49 0.00 0.60 0.60 Tomatoes No land up hill 50 0.00 Absent 52 0.00 Absent 53 0.00 Absent 54 0.00 0.06 0.06 Tomatoes No land up hill 57 0.00 Absent 92 1.00 1.14 0.14 Beans OO1 1.00 1.45 0.45 Tomatoes OO2 0.94 2.74 1.80 Tomatoes OO3 0.50 1.19 0.69 Tomatoes Table on cultivated land Nyakwisi per village Crops on Total area Marshland area HH No marshland, Comments cultivated (ha) cultivated (ha) annual Chief Cell HH Chief HH HH OO4 1.00 1.14 0.14 Tomatoes OO5 1.00 1.14 0.14 Tomatoes OO6 1.00 1.65 0.65 Tomatoes OO7 1.00 1.14 0.14 Tomatoes OO8 1.00 1.10 0.10 Tomatoes OO9 0.05 0.28 0.23 Tomatoes O10 0.00 0.50 0.50 Tomatoes No land up hill O11 1.00 3.00 2.00 Tomatoes O12 1.00 1.20 0.20 Tomatoes O13 2.00 2.60 0.60 Tomatoes O14 1.22 1.70 0.48 Maiz O15 0.90 1.08 0.18 Maiz O16 1.00 1.60 0.60 Sugar cane O17 0.30 1.00 0.70 Tomatoes O18 1.00 1.77 0.77 Tomatoes O19 0.84 1.49 0.65 Sugar cane O20 1.00 1.45 0.45 Sugar cane O21 0.00 0.80 0.80 Beans No land up hill O22 0.67 2.41 1.74 Tomatoes O23 0.15 0.95 0.80 Tomatoes Table on cultivated land Nyakwisi per village Crops on Total area Marshland area HH No marshland, Comments cultivated (ha) cultivated (ha) annual Chief Cell HH Chief HH HH O24 1.00 1.28 0.28 Maiz O25 1.00 1.28 0.28 Maiz O26 1.00 2.32 1.32 Maiz O27 1.00 1.28 0.28 Sugar cane O28 1.00 2.65 1.65 Sugar cane O29 1.00 1.25 0.25 Cabbages O30 1.00 1.60 0.60 Sugar cane O31 1.00 1.60 0.60 Sugar cane O32 0.00 0.18 0.18 Beans No land up hill O33 1.00 1.25 0.25 Tomatoes O34 1.00 1.93 0.93 Tomatoes O35 1.00 2.35 1.35 Tomatoes O36 1.00 1.10 0.10 Maiz O37 0.90 1.61 0.71 Sugar cane O38 0.00 0.20 0.20 Tomatoes No land up hill O39 1.00 2.08 1.08 Tomatoes O40 0.10 0.19 0.09 Sugar cane O41 1.00 1.08 0.08 Maiz O42 1.00 1.27 0.27 Tomatoes O43 1.00 1.21 0.21 Tomatoes Table on cultivated land Nyakwisi per village Crops on Total area Marshland area HH No marshland, Comments cultivated (ha) cultivated (ha) annual Chief Cell HH Chief HH HH O44 1.00 1.27 0.27 Sugar cane O45 0.40 0.51 0.11 Tomatoes O46 0.50 1.12 0.62 Tomatoes O47 1.00 1.20 0.20 Tomatoes O48 0.00 0.50 0.50 Maiz No land up hill O49 0.50 0.90 0.40 Tomatoes O50 0.27 0.45 0.18 Tomatoes O51 1.00 1.38 0.38 Tomatoes O52 1.00 1.15 0.15 Tomatoes O53 0.00 0.10 0.10 Tomatoes No land up hill O54 1.00 1.13 0.13 Tomatoes O55 1.00 1.24 0.24 Tomatoes O56 0.99 1.15 0.16 Tomatoes O57 1.00 1.08 0.08 Tomatoes O58 1.00 1.18 0.18 Tomatoes O59 0.00 0.08 0.08 Irish potatoes No land up hill O60 1.00 1.45 0.45 Tomatoes O61 0.23 0.38 0.15 Tomatoes O62 0.23 0.38 0.15 Tomatoes O63 0.23 0.38 0.15 Tomatoes Table on cultivated land Nyakwisi per village Crops on Total area Marshland area HH No marshland, Comments cultivated (ha) cultivated (ha) annual Chief Cell HH Chief HH HH O64 0.00 0.06 0.06 Maiz No land up hill O65 1.00 1.09 0.09 Maiz O66 0.00 0.15 0.15 Maiz No land up hill O67 1.00 1.14 0.14 Tomatoes O68 0.90 1.05 0.15 Tomatoes O69 0.90 1.40 0.50 Beans O70 0.00 0.32 0.32 Tomatoes No land up hill O71 1.26 1.42 0.16 Beans O72 1.00 1.30 0.30 Maiz O73 0.00 0.21 0.21 Maiz No land up hill O74 0.00 0.18 0.18 Irish potatoes No land up hill O75 1.00 1.15 0.15 Tomatoes O76 1.00 1.11 0.11 Tomatoes O77 1.00 1.10 0.10 Beans Total 99.29 37.33 Table on cultivated land per village Ruhuha Total area Marshland area Crops on HH No Comments cultivated (ha) cultivated (ha) marshland, annual Chief Cell HH Chief HH HH 2 1.30 4 1.35 0.06 Tomatoes 3 1.00 13 1.15 0.15 Soja 6 0.00 #DIV/0! Absent 11 0.90 10 1.00 0.10 Cabbages 14 1.00 0 1.01 0.01 Soja 15 0.90 33 1.35 0.45 Irish potatoes 16 1.00 1 1.01 0.01 Irish potatoes 18 1.00 7 1.08 0.08 Tomatoes 20 0.35 19 0.43 0.08 Tomatoes 23 0.00 #DIV/0! Absent 24 1.00 7 1.08 0.08 Soja 25 0.18 41 0.30 0.12 Cabbages 30 0.00 #DIV/0! Has marshland in Nyakabungo 31 0.25 38 0.40 0.15 Tomatoes 33 0.00 #DIV/0! Absent 43 0.00 #DIV/0! Absent 44 1.00 13 1.15 0.15 Irish potatoes 45 0.00 #DIV/0! Absent 47 1.00 3 1.04 0.04 Irish potatoes 48 1.00 8 1.08 0.08 Irish potatoes 49 0.68 8 0.74 0.06 Tomatoes 55 0.50 11 0.56 0.06 Irish potatoes 57 0.12 53 0.26 0.14 Irish potatoes 58 1.00 6 1.06 0.06 Irish potatoes 1/6 Table on cultivated land per village Ruhuha Total area Marshland area Crops on HH No Comments cultivated (ha) cultivated (ha) marshland, annual Chief Cell HH Chief HH HH 59 1.00 6 1.06 0.06 Irish potatoes 64 0.15 50 0.30 0.15 Tomatoes 68 1.00 4 1.04 0.04 Tomatoes 69 1.00 6 1.06 0.06 Cabbages 70 0.12 45 0.22 0.10 Tomatoes 71 0.50 11 0.56 0.06 Irish potatoes 72 0.00 #DIV/0! Absent 73 1.00 13 1.15 0.15 Soja 74 0.38 38 0.60 0.23 Tomatoes 75 1.00 41 1.71 0.71 Tomatoes 76 1.00 6 1.06 0.06 Tomatoes 77 0.50 11 0.56 0.06 Tomatoes 79 1.00 23 1.30 0.30 Tomatoes 80 1.00 23 1.30 0.30 Tomatoes 82 0.30 29 0.42 0.12 Cabbages 85 0.00 #DIV/0! Absent 92 1.00 21 1.26 0.26 Sugar cane 95 1.00 26 1.36 0.36 Beans 96 0.15 23 0.20 0.05 Tomatoes 102 0.35 15 0.41 0.06 Tomatoes 112 0.00 #DIV/0! Absent 113 0.00 #DIV/0! Absent 117 1.00 12 1.14 0.14 Soja 122 1.00 7 1.08 0.08 Irish potatoes 125 1.00 18 1.23 0.23 Tomatoes 135 0.80 23 1.04 0.24 Tomatoes 2/6 Table on cultivated land per village Ruhuha Total area Marshland area Crops on HH No Comments cultivated (ha) cultivated (ha) marshland, annual Chief Cell HH Chief HH HH 136 0.57 12 0.65 0.08 Irish potatoes 140 1.00 7 1.08 0.08 Irish potatoes 141 0.50 9 0.55 0.05 Irish potatoes 142 0.00 #DIV/0! Absent 145 1.00 26 1.35 0.35 Irish potatoes 147 1.00 7 1.07 0.07 Irish potatoes 148 1.00 13 1.15 0.15 Irish potatoes 151 0.50 6 0.53 0.03 Cabbages Marshland shared by onother family 156 1.00 3 1.03 0.03 Irish potatoes 158 0.60 3 0.62 0.02 Tomatoes 163 0.20 43 0.35 0.15 Tomatoes 164 0.27 33 0.41 0.14 Tomatoes 166 1.00 4 1.05 0.05 Irish potatoes 167 0.15 20 0.19 0.04 Irish potatoes 170 0.00 #DIV/0! Absent OO1 1.00 20 1.25 0.25 Tomatoes OO2 0.70 10 0.78 0.08 Tomatoes OO3 0.15 14 0.17 0.02 Soja OO4 0.50 23 0.65 0.15 Tomatoes OO5 0.80 28 1.12 0.32 Tomatoes OO6 1.00 13 1.15 0.15 Tomatoes OO7 1.00 21 1.27 0.27 Soja OO8 0.61 2 0.62 0.02 Tomatoes OO9 0.25 19 0.31 0.06 Tomatoes O10 0.50 7 0.54 0.04 Tomatoes O11 1.00 26 1.35 0.35 Tomatoes 3/6 Table on cultivated land per village Ruhuha Total area Marshland area Crops on HH No Comments cultivated (ha) cultivated (ha) marshland, annual Chief Cell HH Chief HH HH O12 0.50 6 0.53 0.03 Soja O13 -0.50 433 0.15 0.65 Tomatoes O14 0.16 16 0.19 0.03 Tomatoes O15 0.15 12 0.17 0.02 Irish potatoes O16 1.00 7 1.08 0.08 Soja O17 0.50 23 0.65 0.15 Irish potatoes O18 1.00 29 1.41 0.41 Tomatoes O19 0.10 71 0.35 0.25 Tomatoes O20 1.00 26 1.36 0.36 Irish potatoes O21 1.00 7 1.07 0.07 Irish potatoes O22 1.00 15 1.18 0.18 Irish potatoes O23 0.16 23 0.21 0.05 Tomatoes O24 0.58 8 0.63 0.05 Irish potatoes O25 0.00 100 1.16 1.16 Irish potatoes No land up hill O26 1.00 6 1.06 0.06 Irish potatoes O27 1.00 19 1.24 0.24 Tomatoes O28 0.37 27 0.50 0.14 Tomatoes O29 0.50 9 0.55 0.05 Cabbages O30 0.50 31 0.73 0.23 Tomatoes O31 0.90 20 1.13 0.23 Tomatoes O32 0.70 19 0.87 0.17 Soja O33 1.00 3 1.03 0.03 Irish potatoes O34 1.00 18 1.23 0.23 Tomatoes O35 1.00 7 1.08 0.08 Irish potatoes O36 0.74 24 0.98 0.23 Soja O37 1.00 9 1.10 0.10 Tomatoes 4/6 Table on cultivated land per village Ruhuha Total area Marshland area Crops on HH No Comments cultivated (ha) cultivated (ha) marshland, annual Chief Cell HH Chief HH HH O38 0.08 67 0.23 0.15 Tomatoes O39 0.50 22 0.64 0.14 Tomatoes O40 0.00 100 0.03 0.03 Irish potatoes No land up hill O41 1.00 7 1.08 0.08 Tomatoes O42 1.00 18 1.23 0.23 Tomatoes O43 1.00 14 1.16 0.16 Tomatoes O44 1.00 11 1.12 0.12 Irish potatoes O45 0.20 33 0.30 0.10 Tomatoes O46 1.00 33 1.50 0.50 Tomatoes O47 0.90 20 1.13 0.23 Tomatoes O48 0.90 2 0.92 0.02 Irish potatoes O49 0.90 8 0.98 0.08 Tomatoes O50 0.04 44 0.07 0.03 Tomatoes O51 0.50 38 0.80 0.30 Tomatoes O52 0.90 20 1.13 0.23 Tomatoes O53 0.00 100 0.01 0.01 Soja No land up hill O54 0.50 17 0.60 0.10 Irish potatoes O55 0.90 32 1.32 0.42 Irish potatoes O56 0.90 8 0.98 0.08 Irish potatoes O60 0.15 29 0.21 0.06 Tomatoes O61 1.00 18 1.23 0.23 Tomatoes O62 0.00 100 0.13 0.13 Tomatoes No land up hill O63 1.00 20 1.25 0.25 Tomatoes O64 1.00 6 1.06 0.06 Cabbages O65 1.00 3 1.03 0.03 Tomatoes O66 0.00 100 0.06 0.06 Cabbages No land up hill 5/6 Table on cultivated land per village Ruhuha Total area Marshland area Crops on HH No Comments cultivated (ha) cultivated (ha) marshland, annual Chief Cell HH Chief HH HH O67 1.00 13 1.15 0.15 Cabbages O68 1.00 20 1.25 0.25 Tomatoes O69 1.00 10 1.11 0.11 Tomatoes Total 100.54 18.10 54 of 122 36 of 122 6/6 Table on cultivated West Rusumo land per Total area Marshland area Crops on marshland, HH No Comments cultivated (ha) cultivated (ha) annual Chief Cell HH Chief HH HH 3 1.33 0.43 Tomatoes 5 Absent 11 Absent 14 Absent 32 Absent 34 Absent 36 Absent 39 Absent 41 1.35 0.45 Tomatoes 42 0.30 0.15 Tomatoes 43 1.07 0.07 Tomatoes 44 2.42 2.00 Tomatoes 45 Absent 46 0.33 0.07 Onions 48 Absent 51 0.15 0.15 Tomatoes No land up hill 53 1.03 0.03 Maiz 55 Absent Table on cultivated West Rusumo land per Total area Marshland area Crops on marshland, HH No Comments cultivated (ha) cultivated (ha) annual Chief Cell HH Chief HH HH 56 1.75 1.50 Tomatoes 69 Absent 92 Absent 95 0.06 0.06 Alphalpha grasse No land up hill 98 Absent 101 Absent 103 Absent 105 Absent 106 0.54 0.54 Tomatoes No land up hill 107 0.58 0.58 Tomatoes No land up hill 108 1.10 0.10 Tomatoes OO1 0.70 0.30 Tomatoes OO2 0.74 0.24 Tomatoes OO3 0.70 0.20 Tomatoes OO4 1.10 0.32 Tomatoes OO5 2.37 0.72 Tomatoes OO6 0.12 0.12 Tomatoes No land up hill OO7 1.38 0.48 Tomatoes OO8 1.27 0.27 Tomatoes OO9 0.92 0.42 Tomatoes Table on cultivated West Rusumo land per Total area Marshland area Crops on marshland, HH No Comments cultivated (ha) cultivated (ha) annual Chief Cell HH Chief HH HH O10 0.60 0.15 Maiz O11 0.36 0.08 Tomatoes O12 1.71 1.26 Tomatoes O13 1.23 0.23 Maiz O14 0.30 0.02 Tomatoes O15 1.36 0.36 Tomatoes O16 0.21 0.15 Onions O17 0.32 0.32 Tomatoes No land up hill O18 1.25 0.25 Tomatoes O19 0.08 0.08 Tomatoes No land up hill O20 1.21 0.21 Maiz O21 0.15 0.15 Tomatoes No land up hill O22 0.65 0.15 Tomatoes O23 1.00 0.10 Tomatoes O24 1.45 0.45 Tomatoes O25 1.13 0.23 Tomatoes O26 0.99 0.09 Maiz O27 0.95 0.05 Irish potatoes O28 0.96 0.28 Irish potatoes O29 1.11 0.11 Tomatoes Table on cultivated West Rusumo land per Total area Marshland area Crops on marshland, HH No Comments cultivated (ha) cultivated (ha) annual Chief Cell HH Chief HH HH O30 0.28 0.28 Tomatoes No land up hill O31 0.80 0.80 Beans No land up hill O32 1.28 0.60 Tomatoes O33 0.48 0.03 Maiz O34 0.52 0.52 Tomatoes No land up hill O35 1.00 0.10 Beans Tatal 42.68 16.24 40 0f 48 RUSUMO FALLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT DAM & POWERPLANT COMPONENT R ESE TTLEM EN T AC TI ON PL AN ( R AP ) APPENDIX 4 COMPENSATION RATES FOR ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL CROPS Compensation Rates – Annual Crops Compensation of annual crops is according to the market value of the crop. Market values were established under consideration of the following sources: Information Sources – Market Price of Annual Crops Level of Details Information International Level FAO Statistics (http://faostat.fao.org/site/703/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=703#ancor) Producer prices 2009 and 2010 for Rwanda Figures for Tanzania are not available National level National agricultural statistics Rwanda: Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources, Annual Reports http://www.minagri.gov.rw/ Tanzania: Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security http://www.tanzania.go.tz/agriculture.htm Regional level Consultation with national agronomists (2011/2012) District level Market research in Kirehe and Ngara Districts (2011/2012) Local level Information from resettlement committees of affected villages (2012) = yields of 4 most important crops/ha in a good year Compensation Rates Annual Crops* - Tanzania Reference Price Reference Yield Compensation Compensation Type of Crop for Compensation for Compensation Rate/ha (TZS) Rate/ha (USD) (TZS/t) (t/ha) Tomato 695,881.87 9.00 6,262,936.80 3,946.40 Soya 888,720.00 2.00 1,777,440.00 1,120.00 Irish Potatoes 435,631.50 12.00 5,227,578.00 3,294.00 Sweet Potatoes 522,652.00 9.00 4,703,868.00 2,964.00 Beans 871,263.00 5.00 4,356,315.00 2,745.00 Maize 726,052.50 4.00 2,904,210.00 1,830.00 Onions 3,047,040.00 12.00 36,564,480.00 23,040.00 Yam 1,258,491.00 7.00 8,809,437.00 5,551.00 *most important marshland crops as per self-validation of affected villages, 2012 Compensation Rates Annual Crops* - Rwanda Reference Price Reference Yield Compensation Compensation Type of Crop for Compensation for Compensation Rate/ha (RWF) Rate/ha (USD) (RWF/t) (t/ha) Tomato 268,389.88 9 2,415,508.92 3,964.40 Soya 341,208.00 2 682,416.00 1,120.00 Irish Potatoes 167,252.85 12 2,007,034.20 3,294.00 Sweet Potatoes 200,662.80 9 1,805,965.20 2,964.00 Beans 334,505.70 5 1,672,528.50 2,745.00 Maize 278,754.75 4 1,115,019.00 1,830.00 Onions 1,169,856.00 12 14,038,272.00 23,040.00 Yam 483,174.90 7 3,382,224.30 5,551.00 *most important marshland crops as per self-validation of affected villages, 2012 Reference figures for harmonization as per market price research Rwanda Tanzania Type of Crop USD/ha USD/ha Tomato 3,946.40 3,776.00 Soya 1,120.00 170.12 Irish Potatoes 2,718.00 3,294.00 Sweet Potatoes 2,880.00 2,964.00 Beans 1,600.00 2,745.00 Maize 1,280.00 1,830.00 Onions 23,040.00 12,444.00 Yam n.a 5.551.00 Cabbage n.a n.a *the respective higher rates were considered for the final calculation Kirehe District- Yields from Market Research (2012) Yield Yield in observed in normal 2011/2012 Average Average agricultural agricultural market price market price conditions Max observed Min observed campaign Type of crops (RWF/kg) (RWF/t) (t/ha) yield (t/ha) yield (t/ha) (t/ha) Maize 200 200000 3 4 1.5 3 Sorghum 350 350000 1.5 3 1 2 Rice 550 550000 7 9 4 7 Banana (cooking variety) 50 50000 Irish Potato 100 100000 4 5 3 4 Sweet Potato 100 100000 3.5 5 2 3 Cassava 150 150000 10 12 8 11 Cassava (flour) 130 130000 Taro 150 150000 Green beans 400 400000 Beans(highvariety) 200 200000 3 3 2 2.5 Beans (low variety) 200 200000 1 1 0.7 1 Green Peas 1000 1000000 Soya 300 300000 2 Groundnuts 650 650000 3 Sunflower - - Tobacco - - Tomato 250 250000 Pineapple 65 65000 13 10 7 10 Eggplants (big variety) 150 150000 Eggplants (small variety) 125 125000 Cabbage 100 100000 Carrot 400 400000 Green Pepper - - Onions 600 600000 Red Pepper 600 600000 Pumpkins 150 150000 Amaranth - - Source: SNII RAP Phase 3 Ngara Yield Yield observed observed Yield in Yield in during the during the Average Average normal normal Max Max Min Min 2011/2012 2011/2012 Market Market agricultural agricultural observed observed observed observed agricultural agricultural Compensation Price Price conditions conditions yield yield yield yield campaign campaign Compensation price Type of Crops (TZS/kg) (TZS/t) (bags/acre) (t/Ha) (bags/acre) (t/Ha) (bags/acre) (t/Ha) (bags/acre) (t/ha) price (TZS/ha) (USD/ha) Maize 750 750000 8 2 15 3.5 6 2 2625000 1649 Sorghum 500 500000 7 1.5 10 2.3 5 1 1150000 722 Rice 1000 1000000 35 8 - 8000000 5025 Banana(cookingvariety) 350 350000 5 7 5 7 2450000 1539 IrishPotato 450 450000 6 7 5 3150000 1979 SweetPotato 540 540000 5 8 5 4320000 2714 Cassava 350 350000 7 7 5 2450000 1539 GreenPeas 1800 1800000 6 1.5 2700000 1696 Beans 900 900000 4 5 3 4500000 2827 Tomato 1000 1000000 5 6 6000000 3769 Eggplant 740 740000 7 5180000 3254 Cabbage 600 600000 7 4200000 2638 Onion 1700 1700000 5 5 5 8500000 5339 Carrot 1200 1200000 3.5 4200000 2638 Groundnut 2000 2000000 1.5 3000000 1884 Yam 1300 1300000 6 3 3 7800000 4899 *source:SNII, RAP Phase III, Tanzania Annual Crop Market Prizes-Market Reseacth 2012, Ngara District Lost Income Lost Period Period from from the Market Income Lost Average beetween the first beginning Price for a CropPr during the Income for Yield per seedlings harvest to of the seedling Species ice period a matured Plant and first full Crop production (RWF/seedl (RWF/ with no crop tree - (kg/plant) harvest maturity to full crop ing) kg) production RWF (years) (years) maturity - - RWF RWF Grafted Mango Tree 40 5 1 85 17,000 1,700 18,700 100 Orange Tree 22 3 2 200 13,200 4,400 17,600 250 Citrus Tree 22 3 2 450 29,700 9,900 39,600 250 Pineapple Tree 20 1 2 95 1,900 1,900 3,800 250 Banana Tree 35 1.0 1 70 2,450 1,225 3,675 500 Avocado Tree 35 5.0 2 150 26,250 5,250 31,500 250 Papaya Tree 30 1 2 70 2,100 2,100 4,200 100 Goyava Tree 40 1.5 1 80 4,800 1,600 6,400 100 Passion Fruit Tree 20 1 2 300 6,000 6,000 12,000 300 Tree Tomato Tree 20 1 2 400 8,000 8,000 16,000 250 Labour Compen required to Age of sation Compens restore a a tree Compensat Rate for ation tree to full at full ion Rate for a young Rate for a crop crop a Young nonprod Mature maturity maturit Productive uctive Tree - (daily wage * y Tree - RWF tree - RWF days of (years) RWF work) 17,500 7 14,850 31,700 36,300 17,500 15 8,600 20,317 35,350 17,500 15 16,850 39,567 57,350 5,000 5 1,700 5,100 9,050 3,500 10 1,900 4,088 7,675 10,000 15 15,042 33,125 41,750 17,500 7 2,400 8,250 21,800 17,500 4.0 5,781 14,450 24,000 17,500 9 4,272 13,189 29,800 17,500 9 5,222 16,139 33,750 Compensation Rates Permanent Crops Rwanda Labour Lost Income Compen Lost required to Age of Period Period from from the sation Compens Market Income Lost restore a a tree Compensat Average beetween the first beginning Price for a Rate for ation CropPr during the Income for tree to full at full ion Rate for Yield per seedlings harvest to of the seedling a young Rate for a Species ice period a matured crop crop a Young Plant and first full Crop production (RWF/seedl nonprod Mature (RWF/ with no crop tree - maturity maturit Productive (kg/plant) harvest maturity to full crop ing) uctive Tree - kg) production RWF (daily wage * y Tree - RWF (years) (years) maturity - tree - RWF - RWF days of (years) RWF RWF work) Grafted Mango Tree 40 5 1 85 17,000 1,700 18,700 100 17,500 7 14,850 31,700 36,300 Orange Tree 22 3 2 200 13,200 4,400 17,600 250 17,500 15 8,600 20,317 35,350 Citrus Tree 22 3 2 450 29,700 9,900 39,600 250 17,500 15 16,850 39,567 57,350 Pineapple Tree 20 1 2 95 1,900 1,900 3,800 250 5,000 5 1,700 5,100 9,050 Banana Tree 35 1.0 1 70 2,450 1,225 3,675 500 3,500 10 1,900 4,088 7,675 Avocado Tree 35 5.0 2 150 26,250 5,250 31,500 250 10,000 15 15,042 33,125 41,750 Papaya Tree 30 1 2 70 2,100 2,100 4,200 100 17,500 7 2,400 8,250 21,800 Goyava Tree 40 1.5 1 80 4,800 1,600 6,400 100 17,500 4.0 5,781 14,450 24,000 Passion Fruit Tree 20 1 2 300 6,000 6,000 12,000 300 17,500 9 4,272 13,189 29,800 Tree Tomato Tree 20 1 2 400 8,000 8,000 16,000 250 17,500 9 5,222 16,139 33,750 Compensation Rates Perennial Crops, Tanzania Labour require Period Lost d to Period from Lost Income Lost restore Age of Averag beetwee the Income from the Compensati Compens Incom a tree a tree Compensati Compensati Compensati e Yield n first Market during beginnin Price for Taux de Compensati on Rate for ati on e for a to full at full on Rate for on Rate for on Rate for per seedlin harves CropPri the g of the a plant compensati on Rate for a young Rate for a Species mature crop crop a young a Young a Young Plant gs and t to full ce period producti (TZS/plan on - Plant - a Mature nonproducti Mature d crop maturit maturit nonproducti Productive Productive (kg/plan first Crop (TZS/kg) with no on to full t) FG Tree - TZS ve tree - Tree - tree - y (daily y ve tree - TZS Tree - TZS Tree - USD t) harvest maturit producti crop USD USD TZS wage * (years) (years) y on - TZS maturity - days (years) TZS of work) Grafted Mango 45 3 1 350 47,250 7,875 55,125 3,000 25,000 8 5,000 31,313 65,125 83,125 20 41 52 Tree Non Grafted 30 5 2 200 30,000 6,000 36,000 1,000 12,500 6 - 21,208 46,500 49,500 13 29 31 Mango Tree Grafted Citrus 20 3 2 800 48,000 12,000 60,000 5,000 25,000 10 5,000 32,750 68,375 90,000 21 43 57 Tree (grafted) Non Grafted 15 5 1 500 37,500 3,750 41,250 2,500 12,500 7 5,000 25,714 51,696 56,250 16 32 35 Citrus Tree Pineapp 20 2 3 1,000 30,000 30,000 60,000 700 7,500 7 5,000 16,504 48,914 68,200 10 31 43 le Tree Banana 70 1.5 1 350 36,750 12,250 49,000 300 6,000 6 500 19,425 45,175 55,300 12 28 35 Tree Avocad 45 5 2 200 45,000 9,000 54,000 1,000 25,000 20 5,000 26,625 58,000 80,000 17 36 50 o Tree Papaya 30 2.5 3 250 18,750 11,250 30,000 700 25,000 5 5,000 16,325 45,075 55,700 10 28 35 Tree Coffee Tree 2 2 2 1,600 3,600 2,400 6,000 500 20,000 7 5,000 4,443 12,443 26,500 3 8 17 (Arabica Quality) Coffee Tree (Robust 10 3 2 1,900 57,000 19,000 76,000 700 17,500 7 - 32,950 77,200 94,200 21 48 59 a Quality) *source: SNII, RAP, Phase III, Tanzania RUSUMO FALLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT DAM & POWERPLANT COMPONENT R ESE TTLEM EN T AC TI ON PL AN ( R AP ) APPENDIX 5 CALCULATION APPROACH FOR COMPENSATION RATES FOR RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES Unit Prizes Residential Structures Rwanda Total Total House Replacement Value - Size 40 sqmt, Unit Unit Quantity Price in Price in 2 rooms, raw clay bricks, metal sheet roof, Price RWF USD I. cement outside finish cubic 10,000 12 120,000 198 1 Foundation / Gravel and blocks meters 50 kg 10,000 30 300,000 495 2 Cement for foundation ,joints and finish bag cubic 15,000 8 120,000 198 3 Sand for foundation meter 4 Claybricks (raw) brick 50 2,000 100,000 165 5 Scaffolding and carpentry piece 2,500 40 100,000 165 6 Corrugated iron sheet for roof piece 5,400 48 259,200 428 7 Doors piece 25000 5 125,000 206 8 Windows piece 10000 4 40,000 66 9 Nails kg 1500 10 15,000 25 10 Nails for metal sheets kg 1500 5 7,500 12 13 Labour - - Skilled 10 3000 30 900,000 1,485 - Unskilled 10 1500 30 450,000 743 14 Water for construction operations 150000 248 2,686,700 4,433 Contingency Costs 15% 403,005 665 TOTAL 3,089,705 5,098 Source: SNII, RAP Pgase III, Rwanda Unit Prizes Residential Structures Rwanda House average size Total Unit Total Price of 40 sqmt, 2 rooms, Unit Quantity Price in Price in USD baked clay bricks, RWF metal sheet roof, I. cement finish cubic Foundation / Gravel 10,000 12 120,000 198 meters 1 and blocks Cement for foundation 50 kg bag 10,000 30 300,000 495 2 ,joints and finish cubic 15,000 8 120,000 198 3 Sand for foundation meter 4 Baked bricks brick 35 20,000 700,000 1,155 Scaffolding and piece 2,500 40 100,000 165 5 carpentry Corrugated iron sheet piece 5,400 48 259,200 428 6 for roof 7 Metal Doors piece 65000 2 130,000 215 8 Wood Doors piece 35000 3 105,000 173 9 Windows piece 40000 4 160,000 264 10 Nails kg 1500 10 15,000 25 13 Nails for metal sheets kg 1500 5 7,500 12 14 Iron rods 12 mm ϕ piece 7000 16 112,000 185 Iron rods 6 mm ϕ et 12 piece 2000 10 20,000 33 15 m cubic 65000 9 585,000 965 16 Gravel meter Labour - Skilled 10 3000 60 1,800,000 2,970 Unskilled 10 1500 60 900,000 1,485 Water for construction 200000 330 operations 5,633,700 9,296 Contingency Costs 845,055 1,394 15% TOTAL 6,478,755 10,690 Unit Prizes Residential Sructures Rwanda Total Total House average size of 70 sqmt, 3-4 Unit Unit Quantity Price in Price in rooms, concrete blocks, metal sheet roof, Price RWF USD I. cement plaster cubic 10,000 24 240,000 396 1 Foundation / Gravel and blocks meters 50 kg 10,000 60 600,000 990 2 Cement for foundation ,joints and finish bag cubic 15,000 16 240,000 396 3 Sand for foundation meter 4 Cement blocks brick 450 2,000 900,000 1,485 5 Sticks / Planks for Scaffolding and carpentry piece 2,500 100 250,000 413 6 Metal sheet for roof piece 5,400 96 518,400 855 7 Metal Doors piece 65000 2 130,000 215 8 Wood Doors piece 35000 4 140,000 231 9 Windows piece 40000 6 240,000 396 10 Nails (ordinary) kg 1500 20 30,000 50 13 Nails for metal sheets kg 1500 10 15,000 25 14 Iron rods 12 mm ϕ piece 7000 32 224,000 370 15 Iron rods 6 mm ϕ et 12 m piece 2000 20 40,000 66 cubic 65000 15 975,000 1,609 16 Gravel for pavement and gutter meter Labour - Skilled 10 3000 80 2,400,000 3,960 Unskilled 10 1500 80 1,200,000 1,980 Water for construction operations 300000 495 Total with no contingency 8,442,400 13,930 Contingency Costs 15% 1,266,360 2,089 TOTAL 9,708,760 16,019 RUSUMO FALLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT DAM & POWERPLANT COMPONENT R ESE TTLEM EN T AC TI ON PL AN ( R AP ) APPENDIX 6 BUDGET TABLES Table A6 – 1 Compensation Calculation for Loss of Production from Marshland, Rwanda Amount Labour compensation Amount Amount costs Total amount Area to be Compensation Compensation for loss of Villages in Compensation Compensation Compensation (500 of compensated for factor 1.5 for factor 2.5 production Rwanda USD per year by factor 1.5 by factor 2.5 USD compensation (ha) (USD) (USD) from (USD) (USD) per (USD) marshland ha) (USD) Rusumo East 5.06 18,033 10,459 15,689 7,574 18,935 34,623 2530 37,153 West Rusumo 16.18 65,464 50,407 75,611 15,057 37,642 113,252 8090 121,342 Nyakwisi 31.44 111,151 92,255 138,383 18,896 47,239 185,622 15720 201,342 Nyakabungo 4.25 9,911 8,821 13,232 1,090 2,726 15,957 2125 18,082 Nshungeruzi 26.53 78,648 71,570 107,355 7,078 17,696 125,050 13265 138,315 Ruhuha 17.85 60,224 57,815 86,722 2,409 6,022 92,745 8925 101,670 Total 101.31 567,251 50,655 617,906 Table A6 – 2 Compensation Calculation for Loss of Production from Marshland, Tanzania Amount compensation Amount Amount Labour Total amount Area to be Compensation Compensation for loss of Villages in Compensation Compensation Compensation costs (base of compensated for factor 1.5 for factor 2.5 production Tanzania USD per year by factor 1.5 by factor 2.5 500 USD compensation (ha) (USD) (USD) from (USD) (USD) per ha) (USD) marshland (USD) Nyakiziba, Kabuye 18.25 73,201 70,273 105,409 2,928 7,320 112,730 9125 121,855 Nyakiziba, Kyenda 61.37 250,171 240,164 360,246 10,007 25,017 385,263 30685 415,948 Total 79.62 497,993 39,810 537,803 Table A6-3 Compensation Construction Impacts Compensation Construction ITEM Unit no. of Units unit costs (USD) total costs (USD) Residential Structure, Rwanda unit 3 10700 32100 Large business building, Rwanda Unit 17 16000 272000 Residential Structure, Tanzania Unit 62 8020 497240 Residential Land, Rwanda ha 1.03 83921 86438.63 Residential Land, Tanzania ha 0.88 7000 6160 Business Structure, Permanent Unit 17 10000 170000 Business Structure,Simple Unit 13 5000 65000 Agricultural Land, Rwanda ha 5 5000 25000 Agricultural Land, Tanzania ha 15.75 2500 39375 Compensation Lost Income, business owners Unit 30 3000 90000 Compensation lost Income plus moving allowance, marshland businesses business 81 1200 97200 Allowances for Moving of tenants Unit 36 1500 54000 compensation lost incomes, business tenants unit 36 800 28800 Unit 30,000 12 360000 Compensation permanent crops Unit 20,000 10 200000 Unit 5,000 50 250000 2273313.63 Contingency 10% 227331.363 Total 2500644.993 Table A6 – 4 Livelihood Restoration Livelihood Restoration Unit Unit cost total No units total costs Cost/year investment cost for (USD) (USD) (USD) 3 years /unit HH affected by construction , HH, PAP 400 500 1700 56 95200 agricultural enhancement HH affected by construction , small HH,PAP 600 500 2300 193 443900 business training Sub-Total construction 539100 Support vulnerable people (20%) 107820 Total construction 646920 HH affected by operation, HH,PAP 400 500 1700 200 340000 agricultural enhancement/livestock enhancement HH affected by operation , small HH,PAP 600 500 2300 241 554300 business training Sub-Total Operation 894300 Support vulnerable people (20%) 178860 Sub-total 1073160 Total Operation 2367000 Contingency (10%) 236700 Grand Total 2603700 Table A6 – 5 PIU Operation Costs PIU Operation Costs Cost /yr Cost/yr USD/Month Yr0 Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yr6 Yr7 Yr8 Yr9 The Lead Safeguard Specialist 3000 18000 18000 18000 18000 18000 12000 12000 12000 12000 12000 Communication officer 2000 12000 12000 12000 12000 12000 8000 8000 8000 8000 8000 Social and resettlement officer 2000 24000 24000 24000 24000 24000 24000 24000 24000 12000 12000 Project database manager 2000 16000 16000 16000 16000 16000 8000 8000 8000 8000 8000 Monitoring officer 1000 6000 6000 6000 6000 6000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 Grievance management officer 1500 12000 15000 15000 15000 15000 15000 9000 4500 3000 3000 Grievance management assistant 1000 6000 6000 6000 6000 6000 6000 0 0 0 0 Grievance management assistant 1000 6000 6000 6000 6000 6000 6000 0 0 0 0 Project database manager 1000 6000 6000 6000 6000 6000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 Monitoring assistance 1000 6000 6000 6000 6000 6000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 Monitoring assistance 1000 6000 6000 6000 6000 6000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 Support staff (driver, secretary, office maintenance 1000 6000 6000 6000 6000 6000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 Subtotal 124000 127000 127000 127000 127000 99000 81000 76500 63000 63000 Expenses 100000 200000 75000 75000 75000 50000 50000 50000 50000 50000 Contingencies 12400 12700 12700 12700 12700 9900 8100 7650 6300 6300 TOTAL 236400 339700 214700 214700 214700 158900 139100 134150 119300 119300 Table A-6 -6 Costs for External Coordination and Monitoring International Experts Costs/Year (USD) Yr0 Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yr6 Yr7 Yr8 Yr9 International Expert for RAP Coordination 90000 45000 20000 20000 20000 Monitoring Expert (Outcome Evaluation) 60000 60000 60000 60000 60000 60000 40000 40000 40000 70000 Compliance/Completion Audit 100000 Monitoring /Compensation Disbursement 20000 20000 20000 40000 Totals 170000 105000 80000 100000 100000 60000 40000 40000 170000 RUSUMO FALLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT DAM & POWERPLANT COMPONENT R ESE TTLEM EN T AC TI ON PL AN ( R AP ) APPENDIX 7 DOCUMENTATION (MINUTES OF MEETINGS, FIELD REPORTS) Mission in Ngara 13th and 14th February 2013 Meeting with Ngara District Officers - 13th February 2013 The following are the district officers with whom the Social Development and Resettlement Officer consulted; 1. Helman Hume District community Development Officer 2. Saul Wilson Nyamunda Legal Officer 3. Enoch Mponzi land and natural recourses officer 4. Mhina Toba Ally Environment Officer Issues discussed were the following;  Compensation rates for businesses, houses, land  Implementation of the livelihood programme and LADP through district structures  Financial institution to pay compensation funds to PAPs  Training of district Officers as TOTs for financial management training of PAPs Compensation rates for businesses, houses and land for Ngara district The Officers revealed that there no updated compensation rates for businesses, houses and land they also noted that Compensation rates depend on the property being compensated, it's value, location and market value and there are no current rates at the district for Rusumo area. Implementation of the livelihood programme and LADP through district structures The officers supported the idea of implementing the LADP through the district and indicated that they have a similar program with Kabanga Kenel - a mining project which will resettle more people that Rusumo project. The officers said that the Land Officer will always be available and will provide support needed on behalf of the district. Financial institution to pay compensation funds to PAPs  After a long discussion considering a number of factors such as accessibility, charging of interest rates, knowledge and rights of PAPs to compensation, use and owning of a bank accounts the officers recommended National Micro Finance Bank (NMB) which is the only financial institution available in the district. It was noted that cooperatives in Tanzania similar to SACO of Rwanda are not strong and cannot be trusted with handling cash that belong to individuals.  They also recommended that there should be a contract between NMB and Rusumo Project / NELSAP to carry out the role of paying compensation funds to PAPs. The Officers also proposed that the district Community Development Officer should be a signatory to the contract as the district representative and also as RAP implementation focal point person.  The contract with the Bank should indicate the names of the PAPs, location and how much should be given to each PAP. Training of district Officers in financial management as TOTs who will take up the responsibility to train PAPs in the same. After a long discussion the following were resolved;  Financial management training should proceed the reception of the compensation funds by all PAPs.  Community development officer noted that women are vulnerable in such conditions and recommended that joint accounts should be opened for people who are married and that the financial training should be attended by both spouses.  No conditions for people to receive their money should be put in place especially for Rusumo people who are already involved in business. People have the right to access their funds compensation once they need it.  The list of PAPs should be given to the District Commissioner (DC) with amount due to each PAP  The bank should be consulted for advice concerning the modalities of payment and other financial issues. The following district officers were proposed for the Finance management training as TOTs; 1. Community development officer 2. Cooperative officer 3. Trade officer 4. Land officer 5. Agriculture officer They also Proposed that the training should be combined with that of the district officers in Kirehe district which will carry out the same responsibilities in their district. They in particular requested that the Tanzanian Officers be transported to Rwanda for the training. Proposed facilitation of the TOTs for field work to train the PAPs The officers requested to know what their Rwanda counterparts had proposed and after they were informed they proposed a copy and pest of the same which are the following; � Fuel, lunch and communication, � Training materials ( note book, a pens, pencils and plastic file folds for PAPs. For Trainers markers, flipcharts and flipchart holder plus the flipchart bag). � Requested for a lap top for the focal point person to enable him keep records of PAPs and provide monthly reports to NELSAP. � Proposed transport and lunch facilitation for the PAPs who will come for the training. Meeting with the District Commissioner After the above meeting the officers proposed another meeting with the with District commissioner Mr. David Peter Mafipa, to update him on the resolutions of the meeting with district officers and seek his support. In company of the Community development officer who was representing the District Executive Director a meeting with the DC was convened. After introductions the DC was given full update of Rusumo Project and also on the resolutions by the concluded meeting with district officers. He however expressed concerns with cash compensation basing on the ongoing mining project of Kabanga Kenel in Ngara District. He also appreciated the fact that people affected by Rusumo project are few in number compared to those affected by Kambanga Kenel mining project and that majority of those who will be resettled are business people who are used to handling cash. The DC was also in agreement with the resolutions of the district officers and he also promised his support to the implementation of the RAP and the project in general. Meeting with the NMB, Bank Manager; Joseph Mwita The Social Development and Resettlement Officer / NELSAP decided to have a meeting with NMB manager to assess issues and modalities of using their bank to pay compensation fees to the PAPs. In company of the community development officer of Ngara District a meeting with the Bank Manager was held and the following were noted; 1. The project will not be charged fees for paying compensation money as long as the PAPs own accounts with the Bank. The following are the requirements for opening an account with the Bank; Requirements; 1. Full names, date of birth, residential address , telephone no if any and email address if any. 2. Tax identification number. 3. Introductory letter from relevant authority such as government officials e.g. one from the village chief of their residence. 4. The location / village name 5. ID especially election cards, driving license can be used or medical insurance cards. 6. The amount to open the account which should not be less than 15000 TZ shs. 7. Nature of business e.g. peasants, farmer or business person should be indicated. 8. Three passport photographs with blue background 9. Signature or thumb print Note1:  The manger promised that if all the requirements are in place the bank will transport their officers to Rusumo and open accounts for the PAPs with their Bank.  He also suggested that the project should open an account with NMB Ngara deposit the amount which will be transferred to the individual accounts of the PAPs.  If PAPs hold an account with NMB there will be no charges for transfering the amounts due to them to their individual accounts, but if they operate accounts with other financial institutions they will be charged for the transfer process.  The monthly charge for managing a bank account with NMB is 1000 TZ shs which will be charged to the PAPs as well.  The amount one is allowed to withdraw from the bank at once is one shillings to two million shillings.  The ITM machine can be used to with draw from one to one million shillings. Note2: The Bank manager suggested that if the project requires special treatment, a letter requesting and naming the special treatment should be written to head office of NMB through Ngara branch. The account should be a company account and the letter should spell put the currency and terms and conditions for its operations. The Bank manager also provided a number of flyers which can be used to sensitize the PAPs about the operations of the bank. Meeting with village Rusumo village chief - Mr. Keneth Kefa of Rusumo village TZ side 14th Feburary 2013 The above consultation aimed at identification of the project construction sites. Together with the village chief we toured construction sites for water diversion and the dam site. The following are the explanations given by the village chief; Water diversion proposed site;  This occupies about 6 hectors and the residents are awaiting to be resettled.  This is the place said to contain the diversion of the water.  According to the local chief there are about 40 - 60 hh The power house; The local chief also took us through to the proposed site for the power house on the Tanzanian side. It is down at the slope side of the river with about 10 hh and banana plantation gardens. The following are the explanations given by the local chief;  About two hectares are the ones proposed for the construction of the power house.  About ten households are located there. Constructors' place proposed site; The village chief said that about 10 households were marked for the construction of contractors' site but added the proposed site was never surveyed. Fishing activities on the Tanzanian side. A meeting was held with the fishermen and the local chief who shared the following information; o Only one association does fishing on the Kagera and Ruvubo river. This association is not formal and is not yet organized into a cooperative. The name of the association was not known. According to the fishermen farming is more profitable than fishing and fishing is a par time activity. o Since fishing is done on an individual basis and not regular it was not possible to assess how much income is earned from fishing within a certain period of time per house hold. Kirehe Mission 12th and 14th February 2013 On 12th February 2013 most of Kirehe district officials were attending a training in Kayonza however a discussion was held with Madam Niyonagira Natalie in charge of Agriculture Tel: 0788630500 and Innocent Nshimiyimana who is the Proximity Business advisor for Kirehe district. Issues discussed;  Compensation rates for businesses, houses, land  Implementation of the livelihood programme and LADP through district structures  Financial institution to pay compensation funds to PAPs  Training of district Officers as TOTs for financial management training of PAPs Compensation rates for businesses, houses, land in Kirehe district; The officers said that Kirehe district does not have their own rates. They referred to the National Bank as the one which determines compensation rates for property. The officer in charge of lands and compensation was consulted on the telephone with no response. Further consultation with that National Bank are planned. Implementation of the livelihood programme and LADP through district structures The officer proposed the following; o Proposed implementing the livelihood programe as "Ingoboka" programme - where needy people are identified and given affordable and appropriate assistance where the money is sent to the bank accounts of beneficiaries or, o Implementing it through Direct support for Vision Umurenge Programe (VUP) at the sector level. This discussion was not conclusive however it was suggested that as particular activities for the programmes will be named for each district in partnership with the district then appropriate implementation methodology will be determined. Financial institution to pay compensation funds to PAPs After discussion of the RAP and the compensation process the officials proposed Umurenge SACCO as the appropriate channel for compensating the PAPs and gave the following reasons;  SACCO is a commercial institute accessible in most villages and can offer credit to their clients.  Both spouses should be signatories to the account.  SACCO does not have monthly charges.  SACCO is owned by farmers in the area to which most of the PAPs may belong.  No disbursement charges will be charged by SACCO. Training of district Officers as TOTs for financial management training of PAPs The following officers were Proposed people for financial management training at the district level as TOTs to PAPs; 1. Land Officer urbanization and resettlement 2. Agriculture officer 3. Officer in charge of Cooperatives 4. In charge of social affairs and protection 5. Proximity Business advisor Modalities of financial management training The officers proposed the following based on similar passed experiences at the district;  Suggested training of TOTs which can take one week  The module should include Project management (capital, interest, profit and proposal development), diversification of agriculture and livelihood based on accessible resources and market, "icunga mutungo", Bank account opening, account management, when to withdraw and saving)  Suggested that payment of the consultant should be based on the module and based on previous experience approximately 5000 USD may suffice. Note: Suggested that the training should not be done at the district level where district officials can be called out of the training at any time by their leaders. Facilitation for TOTs for a period of one year; The officers proposed the following to facilitation to the TOTs in training of the PAPs into financial management;  Fuel, communication and lunch (the amount to be discussed with the team)  Training material for PAPs and the trainers e.g. note books, a pens, pencils and plastic file folders for PAPs. For Trainers markers, flipcharts and flipchart holder and their bags.  Trainers should make monthly reports to NELSAP  The consultant should design the training programme / plan Note: NELSAP should write a letter requesting for the participants through the ministry of Local Government. The letter must be approved by the same ministry to enable full participation of all officers. Fishing activities in Kirehe district; The following is the information provided by the district officer on fishing activities in Kirehe district; Aquaculture in Kirere district is only based in Kigarama sector;  It is organized under a cooperative.  It is hoped to be a profitable business  Proposed aquaculture in the marshland which will be permanently flooded. Further information collected on Fishing activities by visiting the fishing sites; Discussion was held with the vice president of the cooperative - Madam Mukabisangwa Jacqline. The following is the information she provided;  The fishing ponds belong to KUAKI  For one to become a member she /he pays shares equivalent to 45,000Rwf  Those who do not have money can provide their labor for the cooperative.  New members are still allowed to come in but admission awaits the start of the project.  However if the number gets to fifty gets admission will close. So far 14 people are on the waiting list.  Current membership is 12 men and 18 women.  They currently own 5 pigs which will provide feeds for the fish.  Currently there is no fish. This was stopped when development of a water body which will supply water for irrigation started.  It is now one year and some months and since then fishing activities stopped.  However even before the water body was constructed they had not been able to harvest any fish because of the poor quality of fish fries which had been planted.  They received support from RDB which stopped and have been promised support by KWAMP.  Support received from RDB was for construction of water ponds and also provided the fish fries.  KWAMP provided pigs.  Part of the Shares was used to put up the current structure for the pigs.  Shareholders provide food for the pigs and one of them does cleaning on a daily basis.  The security guard who is also a member is paid for the service. He is paid 17,000 RWF on a monthly basis. The vice president to the cooperative was not able to provide expected output and profit for the cooperative. Visit to SACCO in Kigarama Sector Discussion was held with Kunda Joel an Account of IMIRASSIREYITERAMBERE SACCO - Tel: 078763507 14th February 2013. The branch Manager was on the field but the was in position to provide all needed information. After explanation of the reason for the visit by the Social Development and resettlement Officer / NELSAP, SACCO account shared a list of people who were resettled by the district and where SACCO carried out the duties of paying compensation fees on behalf of the district. Examples of these are the ones who were affected by the activities of KWAMP. He indicated that based on such experiences SACCO of Kigarama would be in position to carry out compensation roles for the Rusumo project affected people. He also revealed that SACCO is an autonous organistaion and therefore it can have a contract with Rusumo project to carry out payment of compensation funds to the PAPs. Requirements or procedures for SACCO to carry out the compensation payment to PAPs; The PAP must own an account with SACCO. This requires and initial deposit of 1100 RWF for the account card and book. The client / PAP in this case must have an ID with 2 passport photographs to facilitate account opening. The contract between SACCO and Rusumo Project must indicate how much money will be given to SACCO and a list of PAPs who will benefit from the mentioned amount indicating how much will be given to an individual PAP. The compensation money is deposited on SACCO account in BK which is 068- 0319396-02. This is a RWF account and important to note that SOCCO does not operate a dollar account. The is no limit on the membership they can always receive any number. In the process of transferring amounts to the individual accounts it is a policy by SACCO that each individual is charged 300 RWF. Even Tanzanians can be received as long as they adheres to rules and regulations of SACCO. No limit for on withdraws, however if one needs to withdraw more than 500,000 RWF he or she has to communicate it to SACCO in advance of one day. However, whoever owns an account with SACCO is obliged to save at list 1000 RWF on his account. In other words he cannot withdraw all the money from the account there must be a balance of 1,000 RWF. Another obligation for someone who owns an account with SACCO is that he /she must pay for shares equivalent to 5,000 RWF which can be paid at different times in a year. This amount for shares is paid once one decides to leave SACCO. After one has paid for the shares, he / she then gets access to all services offered by SACCO such as access to credit. Accessibility to credit considers that the clients' account has be active within a period of the last 3 months from the time of credit seeking. The amount of credit offered does not exceed 2,000,000 RWF paid within 2 years but one can even pay in a less period depending on his / her affordability. If one wants to close the account he /she writes a letter requesting for the same and he is then allowed to close. In so doing he is paid all the money on his account and he is also paid his / her 5,000 RWF for the shares since he /she is no longer considered as a member. Conclusion and recommendations 1. The project shouldn't hire finance institutions to carry out the compensation of PAPs. Instead the project should make use of existing which is less costly and empowering the PAPs in issues of finance management. 2. It is recommended that all PAPs should undergo finance management training before reception of compensation funds. This call for a quick action in finance management training such that it does not become a load block to compensation process. 3. All spouses should undertake finance management training to as a mitigation measure for conflicts that may arise from the use of compensation funds. 4. Use of district officers as TOTs for finance management training is less costly, manageable and sustainable as opposed to hiring and individual or consultant firm to do it. It will ease monitoring of the same. 5. Training of the TOTs for Ngara district should be combined with training of Kirehe district officers. This will enable harmonized finance training for the PAPs, delivery of same messages, less costly and it will also ease monitoring process. 6. NELSAP should hold workshops with district officers to discuss and decide on the live hood restoration program and LADP plan activities based on the needs and recourses area and people. This will ensure ownership and incorporation of the programs in the existing plans and activities of the districts. 7. A study to inform diversification of livelihood from agriculture to improved aquaculture, apiculture etc in the project area is necessary if the same activities are to be considered in the LADP. RUSUMO FALLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT DAM & POWERPLANT COMPONENT R ESE TTLEM EN T AC TI ON PL AN ( R AP ) APPENDIX 8 REFERENCES REFERENCES African Development Bank 2003: Involuntary Resettlement Policy African Development Fund, 2011: Livestock Infrastructure Support Programme, Appraisal Report IFAD, 2011: Strengthening Women’s Access to Land into IFAD Projects: The Rwanda Experience. http://www.ifad.org/english/land/women_land/WomenAndLand_SynthesisReport_ Eng.pdf International Finance Corporation, 2002. Handbook for Preparing a Resettlement Action Plan, 79 p. http://www1.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/22ad720048855b25880cda6a6515bb18/Re settlementHandbook.PDF?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=22ad720048855b25880 cda6a6515bb18 Republic of Rwanda, 2008: Kirehe Community-Based Watershed Management Project; Programme Design Document, Main Report; http://africa.procasur.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/KIREHE-COMMUNITY- BASED-WATERSHED-MANAGEMENT-PROJECT-KWAMP-PROJECT- DESIGN-REPORT1.pdf Republic of Rwanda, 2011: Strategies for sustainable crop intensification in Rwanda. www.minagri.gov.rw Republic of Rwanda, 2011: Micro-, Small- and Medium Enterprise Development Programme. http://www.minicom.gov.rw/IMG/pdf/Demonstration_Units_Concept_Paper-2.pdf SNC-LAVALIN International Inc., September 2011. Phase II RAP and LADP Report – Livelihood Impact Assessment and Restoration Strategies. Regional Rusumo Falls Hydroelectric and Multipurpose Project-Power generation Plant Final feasibility Study Phase. SNC-LAVALIN International Inc., July 2011. Final Feasibility Design Interim Report. Regional Rusumo Falls Hydroelectric and Multipurpose Project-Power generation Plant Final feasibility Study Phase. SNC-LAVALIN International Inc., May 2011. Phase 1 RAP and LADP. Regional Rusumo Falls Hydroelectric and Multipurpose Project-Power generation Plant Final feasibility Study Phase. SNC-LAVALIN International Inc., 2012. Phase III RAP and LADP Reports, Rwanda and Tanzania USAID. November 2008. Tanzania HIV/AIDS and Malaria indicator Survey 2007- 08. p. 149 USAID, 2008: Rwanda, Land Related Programme Activities. http://usaidlandtenure.net/rwanda/completion-report World Bank, 2001. Involuntary Resettlement, Operational Policy 4.12, Revised February 2011. World Food Programme, 2009: Rwanda: Comprehensive Food Security and Vulnerability Analysis and Nutrition Survey. http://www.wfp.org/content/rwanda- comprehensive-food-security-vulnerability-analysis-nutrition-survey-dec-2012