Joint United Nations Development Programme / World Bank Eg S SESMAP Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme Brazil Hydro and Thermal Power Sector Study Report No. 197/97 September 1997 JOINT UNDP/ WORLD BANK ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAMME (ESMAP) PURPOSE The joint UNDP/World Bank Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme (ESMAP) is a special global technical assistance program run by the World Bank's Industry and Energy Department. ESMAP provides advice to governments on sustainable energy development. Established with the support of UNDP and 15 bilateral official donors in 1983, it focuses on policy and institutional reforms designed to promote increased private investmnent in energy and supply and end-use energy efficiency; natural gas development; and renewable, rural, and household energy. GOVERNANCE AND OPERATIONS ESMAP is governed by a Consultative Group (ESMAP CG), composed of representatives of the UNDP and World Bank, the governments and other institutions providing financial support, and the recipients of ESMAP's assistance. The ESMAP CG is chaired by the World Bank's Vice President, Finance and Private Sector Development, and advised by a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) of independent energy experts that reviews the Programme's strategic agenda, its work program, and other issues. ESMAP is staffed by a cadre of engineers, energy planners, and economists from the Industry and Energy Department of the World Bank. The Director of this Department is also the Manager of ESMAP, responsible for administering the Programme. FUNDING ESMAP is a cooperative effort supported by the World Bank, UNDP and other United Nations agencies, the European Community, Organization of American States (OAS), Latin American Energy Organization (OLADE), and publc and private donors from countries including Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. FURTHER INFORMATION An up-to-date listing of completed ESMAP projects is appended to this report. For further information or copies of completed ESMAP reports, contact: ESMAP c/o Industry and Energy Department The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433 U.S.A. BRAZIL Hydro and Thermal Power Sector Study September 1997 I Contents LIST OF TABLES v LIST OF FIGURES vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vii ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS viii UNITS ix EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 7 Background 7 Objectives of the Study 7 2. POWER AND GAS SECTOR OVERVIEW 9 Primary Energy Resources and Consumption 9 T1he Power Sector 10 Power Sector Organization 10 Power Sector Planning I I Power Sector Reform Initiatives 11 Power Facilities, Supply and Demand 12 Prospects for Gas Fueled Thermal Generation 13 Power Sector Issues 13 The Gas Sector 14 The Gas Sector Organization 14 Gas Sector Policies 15 Existing Gas Infrastructure 15 Bolivia - Brazil Gas Pipeline Project 16 Natural Gas Demand 16 3. THE SOUTH-SOUTHEAST - MID-WEST ELECTRICAL SYSTEM 17 Existing Facilities 17 System Demand 17 Regional and International Interconnections 19 Svstem Operations and Security of Supply 20 Expansion Plans 20 4. UPDATE OF HYDRO CANDIDATES 21 Existing Information 21 Cost of Hydro Projects 22 Historical Variations of Cost Estimates 22 Influence of Modem Construction Methods 23 Expected Efficiency Gains in Project Implementation 23 Environmental Costs 23 Conclusions 23 iii 5. COSTS OF THERMAL OPTIONS 24 Selection of Thermal Candidates 24 Gas Fueled Combines Cycle Plants 25 Steam Thermal Plants 25 Fluidized Bed Combustion Plants 26 Operational Parameters 26 Generation Costs for Thermal Options 26 6. OPTIMUM SYSTEM EXPANSION 28 Planning Methodology and Criteria 28 Economic Parameters 28 Power Demand Scenario 30 Sensitivitv Analyses 30 Long Term System Optimization 30 Case Studies 31 Results 31 Svstem Simulation 34 Simulation Characteristics 34 Results of Inclusion of Gas Fueled Options in the System 34 Economic Evaluation 40 Operational Characteristics of Thermal Plants 40 Imposed Minimum of 80% Plant Factor 41 No Imposed Minimum Operational Level 41 The Secondary Market for Natural Gas 42 ANNEX 45 iv TABLES 1 BRAZIL - Electricitv Demand by Region (1995 to 2005) 2 Long-Term Evolution of Available Generation Capacity 3 TYpical Average Plant Factor of Thermal Plants (1999 to 2000) 2.1 Brazil Proven Energy Resources 2.2 Primary Energy Supply and Consumption 2.3 Brazil Electricity Demand by Region (1995 to 2005) 3.1 SSE and MW System Electricity Consumption (1970 to 1995) 3.2 SSE and MW System Population 3.3 SSE and MW System Electricity Demand Forecasts (1996 to 2005) 5.1 Differences in Generation Costs for Base Load Operation 6.1 Case Studies Analyzed 6.2 Results of the Long-Term Simulation 6.3 Gas Fueled Thermal Plants Scheduling 6.4 (a)-(d) Detailed Simulation Results 6.6 Average Plant Factor of Thermal Plants (1999 to 2005) ANNEX Table A- I Cost of Thermal Generation Options v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Existing Gas Pipelines Figure 2 SSE Interconnected Power System Figure 3 Location of Existing Hydro Plants Figure 4 Location of Uncompleted and Proposed Hydro Plants Figure 5 Operational Modes of Typical Gas Fired Power Generation Plants List of Reports on Completed Activities vi Acknowledgements This report was prepared by a joint ESMAP - ELETROBRAS team, comprising P. Law (Task Manager and Energy Specialist) and H. Garcia (Principal Power Engineer) of the World Bank, and Messrs. A. Ventura Filho, J. Trinkenreich, J. Rosenblatt, M. Pereira dos Santos, and N. Paciornik of ELETROBRAS. The peer reviewer for the study was N. de Franco, Principal Power Engineer at the World Bank. The study assesses the economic viability of the installation of gas fueled power plants in the Brazilian South-Southeast (SSE) electrical system' in connection with the proposed Bolivia-Brazil pipeline. The methodology for developing the least cost power expansion plan was developed and executed by ELETROBRAS. Updating the costs of hydro projects was carried out by the Brazilian Consultant HIDROSERVICE with ESMAP financing, and data for thermoelectric options were provided by Sociedade Privada de Gas (SPG). The analysis was made on the interconnected system which covers the regions of the South, South-East and Mid-West. Though the three regions are interconnected, some energy transfer restrictions exist. This report refers to the SSE system as the integration of the above three subsystems. vii ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ANP Agencia Nacional do Petroleo CPI Consumer price index CTEM Committee for Market Studies DNC Departamento National de Combustiveis ESI Electric Sector Industry LNG Liquefied natural gas MOF Ministry of Finance MME Ministry of Mines & Energy MW Mid-West NNE North-Northeast PCG Planning Coordinating Group PD Plano Decenal SPG Sociedade Privada de Gas SSE South-Southeast YPFB Yacimientos Petroliferos Fiscales Bolivia viii UNITS CFD Cubic Feet per Day MMCFD Million CFD CM Cubic Meter CMD Cubic Meter per Day MMCMD Million CMD CMY Cubic Meter per Year MMCMY Million CMY BCM Billion Cubic Meter BCF Billion Cubic Feet TCF Trillion Cubic Feet. BTU British Thermal Unit MMBTU Million BTU TOE Ton of Oil Equivalent MMTOE Million TOE MMT Million Tonnes MMTPA Million Tons per Annum GWh Gigawatt hour KWh Kilowatt hour TWh Terawatt hour GW Gigawatt KW Kilowatt MW Megawatt kV Kilovolt Kcal Kilocalorie Kg Kilogram bbl barrel ix EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction 1. The electricity sector in Brazil is undergoing important institutional transformations which will increasingly allow the private sector to build new power plants and participate more intensively in distribution activities. The possibilities of introducing gas fueled thermal plants into the system have been stimulated by the agreement recently signed between YPFB and PETROBRAS for the importation of large volumes of gas from Bolivia. 2. The objective of this study is to assess the economic viability of the inclusion of gas turbine and combined cycle power plants in the Brazilian South-Southeast (SSE) Electrical system over the timeframe 1996 to 2015, using natural gas at an economic cost consistent with that to be expected from the Bolivia-Brazil gas import project. The study is based on a comprehensive least cost simulation of the whole Brazilian power system using the ELETROBRAS planning models, and places future thermal power generation wAithin the context of the operation of all plants, hydro and thermal, existing plus expansion. A key feature includes the rationalization of the methods traditionally used by ELETROBRAS to update their database on construction costs of hydro plants in Brazil, so that the relative merits of hydro and thermal plants can be properly considered in the selection process. Demand for Power 3. Dunrng 1995-2005, the annual demand for electricity in Brazil is expected to grow from 243 TWh to 385 TWh as shown in Table 1, which represents an average growth of 4.77%ly. Table 1 BRAZIL - Electricity Demand by Region (1995 to 2005) (TWh) Region 1995 1998 2002 2005 North 12.6 16.0 23.8 31.6 Northeast 38.2 44.8 55.0 65.4 Southeast 143.3 157.7 183.7 205.2 South 37.4 43.1 52.2 60.8 Midwest 11.8 14.7 18.6 22.2 Total 243.3 276.3 333.3 385.2 I 4. To meet this demand, about 27,600 MW of installed capacity should be added to the system over the next 10 years. By the year 2000, ELETROBRAS has estimated electricity sector investment needs of US$38 billion, of which US$20 billion (or US$4 billion/year) are for additional generation. Until recently, about 85% of the planned capacity increments were hydro-based. However, the Bolivia-Brazil pipeline project opens the possibility to include additional gas based options. Current Expansion Plans 5. The SSE Interconnected System covers the South, Southeast and the Center- West regions of Brazil. Hydro generation accounts for 92% of total installed capacity, with over 200 hydro plants of installed capacity 40,800 MW. The system also includes 23 thermal units (coal fired, oil fired and nuclear plants) with a total capacity of 3,080 MW. 6. A review of proposed international interconnections with neighboring countries. and the proposed North-South interconnection linking the Brazilian SSEMW and the NNE systems, showed that only the latter would impact on this study. The others would be either too small or too far in the future to exert any influence. It was assumed that the North-South interconnection would be implemented by the year 2000, with an initial transfer capacity equivalent to 1,000 MW. 7. The latest Plano Decenal recommends additions of 20.4 GW over the decade for the SSE-MW system, of which 15.0 GW would be hydro. Duringr the execution of this study, it became apparent that some increments of gas based thermal generation are needed in the short term, because it will not be possible to complete some of the unfinished hydro projects in time to ensure system reliability. These include two 450 MW gas turbine plants for 1999 and 2000 which could use gas from the Brazil-Bolivia pipeline. to be located in Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. The supply situation in the short tern is also becoming critical in Mato Groso do Sul and Mato Groso, mainly due to transmission constraints. This has prompted ELETROBRAS to plan for an additional 400 to 450 MW to be located in Corumba and Campo Grande, and 450 MW in Cuiaba, and which can be expected to operate at or near base load. Cost Update of Hydro Candidates 8. Cost estimates for a large catalogue of hydro candidates are periodically updated by ELETROBRAS to prepare the Plano Decenal. The reliability of these estimates varies widely, some having been prepared 20 years ago. A review of the cost estimates of sixteen hydro projects with installed capacities between 22 MW and 1800 MW showed that, for projects where the basic design and original cost estimate were prepared in the 1980s, the costs should be updated using fifteen selected price indices instead of the CPI traditionally used by ELETROBRAS. This better reflects the cost of different types of civil works, mechanical and electrical equipment, and engineering services. Projects updated in this way show irnplementation costs 20%-30% lower than with the traditional method. 2 Selection of Thermal Candidates 9. Given the predominantly hydro characteristics of the SSE system, there will be enough peaking capacity in the system for many years ahead, and any thermal additions need to be designed for base load operation. 10. To ensure a consistent comparison between the different thermal options, three base load thermal plant alternatives using proven technologies, standard design and appropriate sizes to ensure economy of scale were selected. Available fuel sources were assumed to be local and imported coal and gas, and plants would be constructed on greenfield sites but close to the existing electrical system. Thermal options were: (i) gas fueled combined cycle (CC) thermal plants in modules of 907 MW; (ii) steam thermal plants using imported coal, in modules of 744 MW, and, (iii) fluidized bed combustion (FBC) steam thermal plants using domestic coal, in modules of 125 MW. The selection of FBC was made given the poor quality of local coals and the need to maintain environmental safeguards. The cost and operational characteristics of these plants include purchase of equipment, erection and contractors' services assuming turn-key arrangements, all estimated in 1995 dollars including reasonable contingencies. Optimum Power System Expansion 11. The system expansion was simulated through: (i) the long term expansion optimization using the ELETROBRAS linear programming model, DESELP, and (ii) the medium term optimization of selected configurations using the OLADE-IDB dynamic programming model. The economic cost of gas for the first 1,800 MW gas fueled power plants was set at about US$2.6/MMBTU. This includes the cost of gas to be supplied at Santa Cruz under the agreement between Petrobras and YPFB (about US$1.1 /MMBTU at a crude oil price of US$1 8/bbl), plus an average gas transport cost to Sao Paulo only, of about US$1 .3/IVIMBTU (US$395/MW of firm capacity), plus an allowance for distribution from the city gate to the power plant. For additional capacity over 1,800 MW, the cost of gas from Santa Cruz was increased to US$1 .45/MMBTU to reflect the higher costs of transporting gas from S.Bolivia or N.Argentina. These costs reflect specific assumptions made at the time of the analysis concerning the expected utilization factor of the pipeline to Sao Paulo, and recent developments suggest that a higher utilization factor will be acheived in the early years. This would make the average economic cost of gas transportation to Sao Paulo as used in this study conservatively high, and so make the conclusions of the analysis more robust. The cost of imported coal was estimated at US$45/tonne (US$1.81MMBTU), with national coal at US$9.4/tonne (US$0.9/MMBTU). 12. Long--term simulations were made assuming the maximum risk of power shortages should be equal or below 5% (1 in 20 years) with the economic value assigned to an energy deficit of US$ 480/MWh. Several scenarios using a range of costs for the hydro and thermal plants were simulated, with the most likely scenario reflecting the revised costs of new hydro plants adjusted down by 30%, the cost of gas fueled plants based on current international costs, the cost of gas delivered to the power plant gate as noted above, and a discount rate of 15%. The results are summarized in Table 2, which show that 6,800 MW of gas fueled generation could be inserted by 2005. If a 10% discount rate is used, 3,400 MW could be inserted by this time. 3 Table 2 Long-Term Evolution of Available Generation Capacity (GW) 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 Hydro 66.4 76.8 82.9 110.4 123.8 152.6 Coal 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 Gas 0 6.8 14.6 21.1 27.2 27.2 Assumes 15% discount rate 13. Medium-term simulations assumed operational policies based on optimization of the marginal cost of water, which represents the economic value of water storage. Common features of the simulations were (i) the SSE system and the North system will become interconnected in the year 2000, and (ii) the first 907 MW increments of gas fueled capacity would become part of the system in 1999/2000. This is because, having demonstrated that gas plants are economic, given the increasing risk of energy shortages in the short term, the only realistic options for meeting the deficits are gas fueled plants which have the shortest implementation periods. 14. The operational characteristics of the gas fueled plants were analyzed using dynamic simulation with synthetic generated hydrological series. This showed an uneven operation of the thermal plants along the years. Therrnal plants may be operating full capacitv for several years in cases of prolonged draught or may be standing idle during periods of high hydraulicity. The average load factor of the thermal plants would be low throughout the entire time horizon, and the average plant factors for each year over the planning horizon would be variable. Typical results are shown below: Table 3 Typical Average Plant Factor of Thermal Plants (1999-2005) year Plant Factor (%) 1999 37 2000 31 2001 30 2002 32 2003 39 2004 43 2005 46 Average 37 4 15. This demonstrates that plant factor increases over time, because when the system starts including more thermal capacity, the absolute proportion of hydro diminishes leaving yet more room for thennal generation. As noted above, the long-term optimization of the system demonstrates the economic justification of installing gas fueled combined cycle plants, even assuming these plants would be required to accept gas through take-or-pay contracts compatible with 80% Load Factor of operation. However, actual fuel consumption under these circumstances would be not compatible with the operation of the Bolivia-Brazil gas import pipeline if water is not to be spilled by some hydro plants. 16. In practice. the full firm cost of gas from the pipeline will have to be paid for whether the thermal plants are operating or not, with such cost comprising the reserved pipeline capacity charge plus the gas commodity charge. When the plants are not operating, the gas could be diverted to industrial consumers, and this would require the generators to enter into special gas supply contracts with such consumers. This form of operation may require some constraints on the upper limit of load factor of operation of the therrnal plants (less than 50%), in order to provide a minimum load factor of supply swhich would be acceptable to the industrial consumers. The tradeoffs between these load factors. the electricity price, and the discount on gas price which may be offered to the industrial consumers are matters of commercial negotiation for the investors and the consumers, but some spillage of water may still occur. Although this concept will not produce an absolute optimum mode of operation from the perspective of the power system. it can be a practical solution to address the near term shortfall in generating capacity in the SSE while ensuring a base load offtake of natural gas from the Bolivia- Brazil pipeline. However, the load factors of operation realized in practice by the thermal plants could be higher than those noted in Table 3, because the risk of deficit is higher than the 5% target level used by ELETROBRAS over the next 3-5 years, and the actual load factors will be influenced by constraints imposed by comnmercial agreements. 17. Recent market surveys of the industrial market over the SSE indicate that there is potential to develop a secondary industrial market, where the major fuels displaced would be the higher sulfur and higher viscosity 'A' series of fuel oils. The current fuels usage of the industrial market indicates that there is potential to develop a secondary industrial market to support up to 1,000 to 2,000 MW of gas fired thermal capacit) operating in complementarity over the whole SSE within the next 5 - 10 years. 5 Conclusions *c The introduction of substantial increments of gas fueled generation capacity in the SSE system is economically justified for a wide range of assumptions regarding fuel prices and other economic parameters. Moreover, the system capacity to accommodate such generation goes well beyond reasonable expectations gas resources available and therefore does not exclude other thermal options (such as coal, LNG). * The system simulation shows that for revised costs of hydro, 30% lower than considered until now, and using a 15% discount rate, about 6,800 MW of gas fired combined cycle generation capacity would be economically justified for inclusion within the SSE interconnected system by 2005 (or 3,400 MW at 10% discount rate). * With no operational Load Factor constraints on the gas fueled plants, hydrological simulation over a long time series indicates that such plants would operate with average Load Factors of 34% to 37%. However, the high regulating capacity of the hydrological reservoirs in Brazil shows that over a smaller time series (say up to 5 years), the annual operational load factor is highly unpredictable under a constraint which avoids the spillage of water. * Market studies suggest the existence of a secondary industrial market in SSE Brazil, of sufficient absorptive capacity to consume natural gas which would become available from 1,000 to 2,000 MW gas fueled plants over the next 5 - 10 years. Although the practicalities of entering into conmnercial contracts w,vith such industrial users could impose some limited sub-optimal constraints on the operation of the whole power system, such constraints would likely be a necessary precondition to the implementation of gas fueled plants by the private sector. 6 1 Introduction Background 1.1 In 1993 PETROBRAS signed a natural gas importation agreement with YPFB for the importation of 8-16 MMCMD natural gas over a twenty year timeframe. This would allow Brazil to increase the share of natural gas in primary energy from the current level of 2% to about 10% within a decade. The gas import project will require the construction of a gas pipeline from Santa Cruz in Bolivia to Sao Paulo in Brazil, and continuing with a spur line to the Porto Alegre in South East Brazil. The total project cost is estimated at US$ 1.6 bn excluding financial charges. For Brazil, the importation of natural gas will bring a number of benefits including the amelioration of atmospheric pollution through the displacement of less clean fuels in Sao Paulo, and opens the possibility to construct gas-fired turbine power plants to supplement the country's hydro- dominated system. 1.2 Since the original gas supply agreement was signed in 1993, several studies have examined the economic and financial viability of the gas pipeline project. The most recent, commissioned by Sociedade Privada do Gas (SPG), concluded that the viability of the pipeline project is dependent on new base load gas-fired power generation located in Sao Paulo, to ensure that large volumes of Bolivian gas are absorbed in the early years of the project. Although these studies have provided valuable analysis concerning the economics of thermal power generation options, they have generally evaluated the generation costs of gas fueled thermal plants operating in isolation from the system expansion plan. Objectives of the Study 1.3 The objective of this study is to assess the economic viability of the installation of gas turbine and combined cycle power plants in the Brazilian South- Southeast (SSE) Electrical system between 1996 to 2015, using natural gas at an economic cost consistent with that to be expected from the Bolivian gas import project. The study makes an analytical step forward in that thernal generation is placed in the context of the rest of the system to simulate the operation of all plants. The study is a classical planning exercise and analyzes the economics of thermal generation under 7 constraints imposed by the need to coordinate hydro and thermal electricity production. It does not intend to define how such generation would be implemented. 14. The assessment was carried out in the following phases: (i) Definition of planning methods, criteria and parameters: This phase was aimed at a definition of the most suitable methodology for the analysis and defining economic parameters to be used. It examined ELETROBRAS' analytical tools used for power system expansion planning and assessed whether the current planning methods are appropriate with respect to attaining a fair evaluation of hydro-thermal mix. Appropriate technical and economic paramneters for the study were also defined. (ii) Preparation of power demandforecasts: This phase included the preparation of most likely scenario for the power demand projections. (iii) Review of the costs of hydro plants: This entailed a review of the existing data on hvdroelectric projects under consideration for generation expansion, and was made with assistance of Brazilian consultants (Hidroservice). Its primary objective was to update the costs of these projects and bring them to a common basis so that their relative merits would be properly considered in the project selection process. The methods used by ELETROBRAS for updating the costs of hydro plants through the use of indices were reviewed and a more precise method suggested. Then, the possible variation of costs of hvdro projects due to new construction methods were analyzed. Also, a confidence band for costs estimates of hydro projects was defined and later used for sensitivity analyses. (ivj Estimate of costs and technical operation characteristics of thermal plants: Feasible thermal plant options and site locations for generation expansion were agreed with ELETROBRAS. Updated costs were prepared for each plant (including coal-fired, oil-fired. gas.-fired combined cycle and gas fired simple cycle plants), reflecting local construction costs in Brazil, but using primarily benchmark international costs. Relevant associated costs including port facilities and pollution control equipment were included where appropriate. The SPG study was used to provide cost data for this stage. (v) Preparation of Alternative Expansion Plans: ELETROBRAS planning models were applied to prepare the least cost system power generation plan. The objective was to test the economic viability of the insertion of increments of thermal power plants in the least cost plan considering the economic cost of plant and fuels. Sensitivity studies to hydro project implementation costs with the variation range defined in (iii) above. and to the discount rate, were made. (vi) Estimate of gas demand for gas for power generation: Using the output from steps (i)-(v) above, preliminary scenarios were drawn for the economic demand for gas in power generation. The annual and inter annual variations of gas demand for power generation were assessed and tested against international contractual practices for power supply. The likelihood of developing secondary gas markets for any necessary smoothing of aggregate gas demand characteristics was also assessed. 8 2 POWER and GAS SECTOR OVERVIEW Primary Energy Resources and Consumption 2.1 Brazil is endowed with substantial energy resources as shown in Table 1.1. Proven resources of fossil fuels are estimated at about 3,300 million tonnes of oil equivalent (MTOE) which comprise about 77% coal, 17% oil and 4% natural gas. In addition, there are large reserves of shale oils and gases which, although not properly evaluated, are believed to be of similar size to the proven reserves of oil and natural gas. Proven reserves of firm hydro are estimated at 82.7 GWy. Table 2.1 Brazil Proven Energy Resources Specific Unit MTOE Natural Gas 146 BCM 124 - )Oil 659 MMCM 575 Coal 10,157 MMT 2,566 Peat 129 MMT 40 Hydro (firm) 82.7 GW/y 210/y Source.- Aational Energy Balance-1994 2.2 Almost half of Brazil's proven reserves of natural gas are located in the South South East. The reserves offshore Rio de Janeiro are 63 BCM which is almost all associated gas, and account for almost 40% of the nation's total. About 5.5 BCM of non- associated gas are located offshore Sao Paulo. Taken together, Bahia and the Amazonian basin hold a further 40%. About 70% of proven gas reserves in Brazil are associated with oil. 2.3 The domestic production and imports of primary energy are shown in Table 1.2. This shows that hydropower accounts for about one-third of primary energy. Petroleum also provides almost one third of primary energy, and the remainder is derived mainly from wood and sugar cane derivatives. Natural gas, when adjusted for reinjection and losses, contributes only 2% to the country's primary energy supplies. 9 Table 2.2 Primary Energy Supply and Consumption Unit Domestic Domestic Net Net Production Production Imports Imports (unit/y) (10 3 TOE) (unitly) (103 TOE) Natural Gas BCM 8.8 7,508 - Petroleum MMCM 38.7 33,803 32.0 27,918 Coal MMT 6.9 1,980 11.4 8,370 Hydropower Gwh 243 70,446 - Wood MMT 78.8 24,110 Baggase MMT 102.1 21,357 Other 3,105 TOTAL 162,309 36,288 Source: BRAZIL National Energy Balance- 1994 The Power Sector 2.4 The Brazilian power sector has shown an impressive history of rapid growth and technological development over the last 30 years, under a sector organization dominated by central planning and investment selection criteria oriented by the need to give priority to Brazil's own natural resources. Large hydro projects and a controversial nuclear program were favored in part by such policies. Thermal generation has played little role, limited to the implementation of coal based plants using low quality indigenous coals. Thermal generation based on hydrocarbons or imported coal have not been considered viable options in the past, since these would increase external dependence. 2.5 The power sector is dominated by hydro power, and official development plans include substantial additional hydro generation capacity for at least the next decade. To attract higher levels of investments to the sector, the Government's objectives include increasing the efficiency of the sector, introducing competition and encouraging private sector participation. Under these policies, thermal power generation by independent power producers will become an important feature of the system. Power Sector Organization 2.6 The Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME) is responsible for policy making and coordination of development plans for the sector, and regulation is vested with DNAEE (National Department of Water and Energy Development), a department of the Ministry of Energy. The planning and finance ministries have traditionally had authority over the levels of tariffs. 10 2.7 Sector utilities include several major generation and transmission companies (e.g. Furnas, Chesf, Eletronorte, Eletrosul, and Cesp), many distribution companies, (e.g. Light, Eletropaulo, Paulista, Celesc, Escelsa, and Coelba), a few major integrated generation, transmission and distribution companies (e.g. Cemig, Copel, and CEEE), some 100 minor distribution companies and the Brazil-Paraguay power plant (ITAIPU). 2.8 Most of the companies are organized as corporations, and ownership of the shares is widely varied. Federal control is concentrated through ELETROBRAS, the sector holding company, in the major generation companies (Eletronorte, Chesf, Furnas and Eletrosul) and the distribution companies serving the city of Rio de Janeiro and the state of Espirito Santo (Light and Escelsa)2. ELETROBRAS also holds minority and/or non voting stock in most of the other utilities. The majority of shares in the utilities are state owned, and there are about 90 privately owned utilities, mostly in the distribution segment of the ESI. Power Sector Planning 2.9 ELETROBRAS has the responsibility for sector planning, and prepares a ten- year expansion plan for the sector (the Plano Decenal, PD). This is supported by a Planning Coordinating Group (PCG) for the interconnected systems, in which 35 regional utilities are represented. The PDs are prepared each year for the ten subsequent years, using as a starting point the nation's socio-economic prospects which influence demand projections. Expansion planning is based on the integrated development of the systems taking into account energy interchange possibilities under security of supply criteria which is defined by the MME. More often than not, financial restrictions constitute an important constraint to development. The result of the planning exercise indicates plants to be implemented and their scheduling, as well as the transmission reinforcements that are required. These results are sub-optimum under financial restrictions. 2.10 There is currently much private sector interest in the generation expansion in Brazil and private sector participation is expected to increase in the future, with the result that the PDs are expected to take more the form of "indicative planning". Power Sector Reformn Initiatives 2.11 The electricity sector in Brazil is undergoing important transformations. In February 1995, the National Congress approved Law No. 9074, of Concessions for Public Services. This law established a new regime for awarding concession contracts for public works and services, which wrill allow increased private sector participation in power, transport, telecormrmunications and water supply. The law is intended to attract private investments by delegating constitutional authority to provide public services to private investors. Also, on July 7, 1995 the Congress approved Law NO. 9074, known as Conversion Law, which further defines the role to be played by private investors in the supply of electricity services. Additionally, the government has sold two distribution companies (ESCELSA and LIGHT) and announced its intention to sell other distribution 2 Control of Light and Escelsa have recently been sold to private investors. 11 companies (CERJ) and at least its controlling shares in some of the major utilities. In parallel, efforts are being made to establish clear rules for granting fair access by. producers to transmission grids and to define wheeling changes. The policy with respect to sector ownership has caused the Government to initiate a review of the power sector structure and regulations, with the objective of determining how best to modemize the sector in line with sector reforms in countries such as Chile, Argentina and Colombia. This transition will increasingly allow the private sector to build new power plants and participate more intensively in distribution activities throughout Brazil. Although the reforms are still in the transitional phase, they will eventually alter the present model of the power sector planning and operations. Power Facilities, Supply and Demand 2.12 Brazil's electricity production in 1994 reached 270 TWh --of which 96% was hydroelectricity-- to serve 37 million customers. The electricity service coverage is about 90%, and per capita consumption is about 1,780 KWhly. Existing Facilities 2.13 The ESI consists of 54,100 MW of installed capacity and about 152,000 km. of HV lines (over 69 kV), organized in two major grids: The South-SouthEast and MidWest interconnected system (SSE system), serving the states of Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro. Minas Gerais, Parana, Rio Grande do Sul, Espirito Santo, Goas, Mato Grosso, Santa Catarina and Mato Grosso do Sul, with about 74% of the energy consumption, and - The North-NorthEast grid, serving the states of Bahia, Pernambuco, Alagoas. Sergipe; Rio Grande do Norte, Paraiba, Ceara, Piaui, Maranhao, Para, and Tocantins, with about 23% of the country's energy consumption. 2.14 These two grids are not interconnected, and there are in addition several minor isolated systems in the more remote areas of the country. 2.15 Total generating capacity in the SSE-MW system is 40,784 MW, which takes into account 6,300 MW (or half) of the capacity of Itaipu. The installed capacity in the SSE system accounts for about 73% of the total installed and in operation in Brazil. Potential development of the system will use part of the available hydro projects with a total of 55,500 MW which have been evaluated and taken into account for preparing expansion plans. Prospectsfor Supply and Demand 2.16 The Technical Committee for Market Studies (CTEM) has estimated that, during the period 1995-2005 annual power demand will grow from 243 TWh to 385 TWh as shown in Table 2.3. This represents an average of about 14,500 GWh per year, and reflects an average annual growth of 4.7% in electricity consumption. This is rather 12 modest when compared with past trends (annual demand growth was 5.8% during 1980- 1990, and 3 .9% during 1990-1995). Table 2.3 BRAZIL - Electricity Demand by Region (1995 to 2005) (TWh) Region 1995 1998 2002 2005 North (including Maranhao) 12.6 16.0 23.8 31.6 Northeast (less Maranhao) 38.2 44.8 55.0 65.4 Southeast 143.3 157.7 183.7 205.2 South 37.4 43.1 52.2 60.8 Midwest 11.8 14.7 18.6 22.2 Total 243.3 276.3 333.3 385.2 Source ELETROBRAS .17 The current ELETROBRAS Master Plan indicates that to meet this demand, about 27.600 MW of installed capacity should be added to the system in the 10 year period. Sector investment needs in the period 1996-2000 are estimated at US$ 37.7 bn, of uwhich US5 19.3 bn (average US$ 3.9 bn/y) are for additional generation. Prospects for Gas Fueled Thermal Generation 2.18 Hvdro plants represent a large proportion of the expansion in installed capacity. In the PD 1994-2003, about 85% of the additional capacity planned would be hvdro based. The dominance of hydro solutions is in part due to the existence of low cost hydro and in part to the lack of available thermal options. The Bolivia-Brazil pipeline project opens the possibility of additional thermal options with reasonable fuel costs, and the definition of the role of gas fired power plants in the SSE integrated power system is essential to confirm the demand for natural gas in power generation from the pipeline. Power Sector Issues 2.19 Due to the scarcity of financial resources, financing the power sector expansion has become increasingly difficult to the point that several generation projects have suffered execution delays. Public utilities' self-generated funds are only 10%-30% of the funding needed for future investments, and multilateral sources of financing are unlikely to exceed 6-10% of the sector capital needs. Given the limited capability of the government to provide subsidies to the power sector, there is an urgent need to increase self-generated funds and attract private investors. 2.20 Increasing cash generation requires increasing the efficiency of power utilities, and adjustments in the structure and level of tariffs to reflect economic costs. Until very recently, low tariff levels were a major problem. In the pe'riod 1990-1994 for instance, the weighted average revenue per unit from power sales varied between USS cents 4.4 and 5.2 per KWh, and rates covered only about 60% of economic costs. ELETROBRAS has 13 calculated a long run marginal cost of generation of US cents 3.4/kWh for the SSE system and 3.8 US cents/KWh for the NNE system. As generation costs account for about 40 to 50% of total production costs, full economic costs to the final user would be about US cents 7-9/KWh. A sustainable participation of the private sector in power supply cannot be envisaged without prices which reflect economic costs, and the current efforts by the government to set clear rules for private investors are expected to soon increase their participation in the power sector. The Gas Sector 2.21 The gas sector in Brazil is far less dominant than the power sector in terms of energy supply. Until recently, little attention was paid to the organizational requirements which would encourage the efficient development of natural gas. This is rapidly changing with the prospects for the importation of Bolivian gas. A large section of industry is now eager to secure a share of the imported gas, and this has pushed the various participants in the gas sector to play a more active role in its future development. Funding the accelerated gas sector development will depend on access to domestic and foreign capital, and a condition for such investment is that a legal and regulatory framework for the gas industry is established, which offers the prospect of stability, acceptable risk and reasonable rewards. The Gas Sector Organization 2.22 The Federal Govern-ment has, through the Constitution, the national monopoly for exploration, production, import, export and bulk transport of petroleum, petroleum products and natural gas. The monopoly was devolved to PETROBRAS through the law which created the company, and PETROBRAS has since fully exercised its monopoly powers. In oil and gas operations, the only area where other entities have had substantial involvement is at the retail distribution level. For distribution of petroleum products, private sector have about 65% market share with the remainder taken by the PETROBRAS subsidiary, BR-Distribuidora. The states have the monopoly of gas distribution, which until recently could only be exercised through State gas distribution companies, with each company regulated by the corresponding State Secretariat of Energy. 2.23 At the federal level, responsibility of regulating the gas sector is shared by the Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME) and the Ministry of Finance (MOF). Through the National Secretariat of Energy, the MME has responsibility for formulation and implementation of the national energy policy, and for guiding and the activities of PETROBRAS. This mandate is carried out by the Departamento National de Combustiveis (DNC) which is under the National Secretariat of Energy, and is the regulatory agency for the oil and gas sector. The DNC authorizes allocation of supply and proposes price adjustments of oil products. In fact the MOF, through their Secretariat of Economic Policy, is in charge of prices and tariffs of public and administrated goods. 2.24 The two largest gas distribution companies in Brazil are COMGAS (Sao Paulo) and CEG (Rio de Janeiro). Both were originally established as private sector 14 companies to distribute manufactured gas, and are currently converting their networks to distribute domestic natural gas. The other industrial natural gas distribution companies along the north east coast are small in comparison, with BR Distribudora (the distribution subsidiary of PETROBRAS) having about 40% of the capital in these companies. 2.25 Although the State Secretariats of Energy approve gas prices to final consumers, their effectiveness in regulating gas distribution has been small. This is because: (i) the States own the distribution companies and have a close relationship with their administration; (ii) the Federal Government controls the bulk supply price of gas from PETROBRAS to the distributors as well as final price of competing fuels. Gas Sector Policies 2.26 The Constitutional Amendment No.9 (November 9, 1995), removed all constitutional barriers to private sector participation in oil and gas activities in Brazil. Through revisions to Article 177, the Federal Government can contract state-owned and private companies for the activities related to the petroleum monopoly, covering the research or exploration and prospecting or production of the oil reserves, including natural gas and other fluid hydrocarbons; the refining of Brazilian and foreign petroleum; the importation and exportation of crude petroleum and basic petroleum derivatives, as well as transportation, by means of a conduit, of crude petroleum, its derivatives, and natural gas of any origin. A Hydrocarbon Law was approved in 1997 which defines how the Constitutional Amendment will be implemented and which creates the new hydrocarbon sector regulatory agency (the ANP). In addition, the 1995 Concession Law for Public Services referred to earlier spells out that all concessions for public services (which includes gas distribution) must be awarded under a competitive bidding process. These events have greatly improved the possibilities for private sector investments in Brazil's gas-sector. Existing Gas Infrastructure 2.27 The existing gas pipeline systems and the proposed Bolivia - Brazil pipeline are show-n in the Annex, Fig 1. 2.28 There are five existing gas pipeline systems located along the Atlantic coast, and all operated by PETROBRAS. The Ceara System comprises 56 km of onshore pipeline to transport about 0.2 MMCMD of gas in the Fortaleza area. The Rio Grande do Norte System comprises 654 km of onshore pipeline and transports gas from the offshore field of Ubarana in the state of Rio Grande to Recife. The Bahia System originates in the state of Alagoas. and delivers gas to Alagoas, Sergipe and Bahia and on to Salvador through 900 kms of onshore pipelines. The gas production from these three states arnounts to about 8 MMCMD. The Espirito Santo System comprises 205 km of onshore pipeline from Sao Mateus to Victoria, transporting about 0.6 MMCMD from the field of Ca,ao. 2.29 The Rio de Janeiro - Sao Paulo System connects the offshore gas reserves of Campos and Santos fields to Rio de Janeiro and Greater Sao Paulo through 870 km of onshore pipelines. The total gas production of Campos fields was about 8.7 MMCMD in 15 1995, of which 1.1 MMCMD was distributed by CEG in Rio de Janeiro and a further 2.5 MMCMD supplied to industrial consumers served direct by PETROBRAS. Gas available for sale from existing fields in Campos would be about 30 BCM. In the Santos basin, the Merluza field came on stream in 1993 to provide additional supplies to COMGAS, and during 1995 supplies distributed by COMGAS reached about 3 MMCMD from both Campos and Santos. The Merluza field would account for 17 BCM of available reserves, corresponding to a production plateau of 2.5 MMCMD. 2.30 The Southem areas of Parana and Santa Catarina area have not yet developed gas pipeline systems, despite high potential demand in the industrial sector. Although there are as yet no gas transmission systems in the Amazon region, several projects are currentlv under study, in particular gas transmission to markets of Manaus and Porto Velho by pipeline and as LNG. It is unlikely that any future Amazon gas system would be interconnected with other regions. Bolrvia - Brazil Gas Pipeline Project 2.31 The proposed gas pipeline from Bolivia compnrses a 32 inch gas pipeline running from Santa Cruz in Bolivia to Sao Paulo, continuing with a smaller diameter southem leg to Porto Alegre. This pipeline will integrate into the existing PETROBRAS pipeline system which runs from Sao Paulo to Rio de Janeiro and north to Belo Horizonte, and which currently transports gas from three offshore fields in the Campos and Santos basins. The total investments in the pipeline are estimated at US$1.6 billion excluding IDC. The capacity of the pipeline will be 30 MMCMD at full compression which is almost double the gas supply plateau of 16 MMCMD specified in the agreement %with Bolivia. 2.32 The project structure requires PETROBRAS to be the purchaser of the gas produced by the companies which resulted from the capitalization of YPFB, with YPFB now acting as the aggregator. The transport of gas will be handled by the two transport companies with one on the Bolivian side and the other on the Brazilian side. PETROBRAS will then sell the gas to the Brazilian state gas distribution companies at a price made up of the price it pays for the gas commodity in Bolivia, plus the transport charges. The price paid for the commodity is linked to a basket of petroleum fuels at their international prices as specified in the gas sales agreement between PETROBRAS and YPFB. Natural Gas Demand 2.33 The gas demand studies carried out to date have focused on the regions expected to be supplied by the Bolivian gas pipeline project, in particular Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and the Southern States of Parana, Santa Catarina, Rio Grande Do Sul, and Minas Gerais. 2.34 The main components of gas demand are for industrial use and power generation. Studies carried out so far show a consistently large future industrial demand for natural gas in comparison with the likely available supplies. The most recent studies indicate that the potential industrial market for gas in the seven states along the route of 16 the pipeline will reach about 20 MMCMD and 30 MMCMD by the years 2000 and 2010 respectively. This includes those markets currently supplied from domestic gas in Rio de Janeiro and Sao Paulo (about 6.7 MMCMD), but excludes the potential markets for power generation. This compares with total gas production from the Santos and Campos basins plus Bolivian imports (under the Gas Supply Agreement) of 21 MMCMD in 2000 and 26 MMCMD in 2005. It is evident that the implementation of large gas fired power projects will require additional gas supplies, probably from S. Bolivia and N. Argentina. 17 3 THE SOUTH-SOUTHEAST - MID-WEST ELECTRICAL SYSTEM Existing Facilities 3.1 The SSE Interconnected System covers the South, Southeast and the Center- West regions of Brazil (Annex, Fig 2), and includes the states of Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Espiritu Santo, Minas Gerais, Goias and Brasilia, Mato Grosso, Parana, Santa Catarina, Rio Grande do Sul, and Mato Grosso do Sul. Hydro generation is predominant with over 200 hydro plants for a total installed capacity of about 40,800 MW which represents 92% of total installed capacity (including half of the installed in capacity of Itaipu). The system also includes 23 thermal units which amount to 3,080 MW, or 8% of installed capacity. These are coal fired steam plants (1,400 MW)V, oil fired plants (1,380 MW) and a nuclear unit (660 MW). 3.2 The transmission system is complex with voltage levels of 750, 500, 440, 345, and 230 kV in AC and ± 600 kV in DC. It interconnects the large number of generation centers to consumption centers. Despite the large size of the system, some transfer restrictions exists which must be taken into account when planning the system expansion. System Demand 3.3 The SSE system demand grew vigorously at 11% pa during 1970-1980 and maintained growth at an average rate of 6% pa between 1980-1995. The past power consumption and growth rates are shown in Table 3.1: 18 Table 3.1 SSE and MidWest System Electricity Consumption (1970-1995) (TWh) Southeast South Midwest Total Consumption (TWh) 1970 28.4 3.6 0.6 32.6 1980 80.7 14.1 3.4 98.2 1990 124.0 28.2 8.4 160.6 1995 143.3 37.4 11.8 192.5 Demand Growth (% p.a.) 1970-1980 11.0 14.6 18.9 11.7 1980-1990 4.4 7.2 9.5 6.3 1990-1995 2.9 5.8 7.0 6.2 3.4 Demand projections are prepared annually by ELETROBRAS and are based on different scenarios for macroeconomic growth, demographic projections, goals for electricty coverage to residential consumers, and specific development plans of large consumers and autoproducers. Lately, variables for price elasticity, conservation, and fuel substitution measures have been taken into account. A key factor in projecting demand is the expected population growth of the country, which is forecast to increase by 1.6% p.a. from 157 million (1995) to 184 million (2005). 3.5 The projections are based on macroeconomic assumptions which represent govermment growth objectives. These assume that, after a recession period due to the economic adjustment program, there will be a sustained economic growth, and four scenarios were prepared which cover a range of economic growth options. However, taking into account that, in the short term the growth would be constrained by deficit reduction and inflation targets, the two high growth scenarios are considered unlikely. The lowest growth scenario was also considered unlikely as it would reflect a continuous depressive trend. The scenario adopted for this study, (Scenario II of Plano 2015) is based on GDP growth of 5.0% p.a. for the period 1996-2005 and the demographic parameters shown in Table 3.2. The elasticitv of electricity consumption to GDP for 1996-2005 period would be 0.94. It is noted that elasticity in the past has shown large fluctuations due to the instability of the economy ( 0.74 for 1970-1980; 3.93 for 1980-1990 and 1.55 for 1990-1995). 19 Table 3.2 South-Southeast and Midwest System Population (millions) Southeast South Midwest Total 1995 66.4 23.1 10.6 100.1 2000 71.0 24.5 12.2 107.7 2005 75.3 25.9 13.9 115.1 Ave. Growth (% p.a.) 1.3 1.2 2.7 1.4 3.6 The resulting demand projections for the period 1996-2005 are shown below: Table 3.3 SSE and MW System Electricity Demand Forecasts (1996-2005) (TWh) Southeast South Midwest Total 1995 143.3 37.4 11.8 192.5 1996 147.0 38.9 12.6 198.5 1997 153.2 41.1 13.6 206.9 1998 157.7 43.1 14.7 215.5 1999 163.7 45.2 15.5 224.4 2000 170.3 47.6 16.5 234.4 2001 177.0 49.8 17.5 244.3 2002 183.7 52.2 18.6 254.5 2003 190.7 54.9 19.8 265.4 2004 197.8 57.9 21.0 276.7 2005 205.2 60.8 22.2 288.2 Ave. Growth (%p.a.) 3.7 5.0 6.5 4.1 Regional and International Interconnections 3.7 Potential expansions of transmission facilities that would affect the SSE system are the reinforcements of the existing interconnections between the sub-systems (SSE-MW), the interconnection with the North-Northeast (NNE) system, and the international interconnections with Argentina, Uruguay, Bolivia and Venezuela, which have been promoted within the framework of the MERCOSUR treaty and bilateral agreements. A preliminary review of these potential expansions shows that the link of the 20 SSEMW and the NNE systems (NS interconnection) would impact the results of this study. The others would either be too small or too far in the future exert any influence. 3.8 The latest studies on the NS interconnection have shown that there are important economic benefits of implementing this interconnection. The project appears justified if implemented as early as 1999, and for purposes of this study it was assumed that the interconnection will be implemented by this time, with an initial capacity of transfer equivalent to 1,000 MW. System Operations and Security of Supply 3.9 Operational planning of the SSEMW system is prepared by ELETROBRAS under agreements worked out in the Coordination Group for the Operation of the Interconnected System (GCOI) in which major generators are represented. The activities of the GCOI include the preparation of long term operation plans, their review and adjustments for short term operations and system supervision and control through the ELETROBRAS dispatch center in Brasilia. The operational planning takes into account the main characteristics of the system which are: * the existence of large reservoirs with multi annual storage capacity * large distances from production to consumption centers * hydro energy generation interdependence between basins * hydrological complementarity between river basins * high degree of interconnection between sub-systems 3.10 Currently the GCOI is responsible for deciding when and how to operate thermal facilities held in reserve for complementing of the large hydro based generation plant. These plants are called to generate full capacity as base load whenever the reservoir levels and the current hydrological conditions indicate a risk of deficit higher than the adopted standards. Expansion Plans 3.11 The most recent PD covers the period 1996-2005. It provides forecasts of the power market for the region, the sub-regions, and for the utilities within in the regions, and provides information on the power plants and transmission lines expected to come on line in the period 1996-2005. For the SSEMW system, it reconmmends additions to the installed capacity of 20,393 MW over the decade, of which 15,035 MW would be hydro. The PD departs from previous PD in that it includes some gas based thermal generation. This is because the time required to complete some of the unfinished hydro projects would not permit their commissioning in time to ensure system reliability. Thus, the 1996 PD includes two 450 MW gas turbine plants for years 1998 and 1999 which would utilize gas from the Brazil-Bolivia pipeline. They would be placed in the consumption areas of Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro and would be implemented by the private sector. In case of fiurther delays in gas supply they would start operations with distillate fuel. 21 4 UPDATE OF HYDRO CANDIDATES Existing Information 4.1 Brazil's potential hydro resources are estimated at 261,000 MW for a production of 129 GW-year of firm energy. About 20% of this potential has been already installed, and not all the rest would be economically competitive. Besides, many large projects, specially in the Amazon basin are unlikely to be developed due to environmental concerns. Nevertheless, resources that can be economically developed and are environmentally sustainable are large by any standards. 4.2 Cost estimates of a large catalogue of hydro plants, constructed over time by ELETROBRAS and several state companies, are periodically updated by ELETROBRAS on the basis of the specific characteristics of each project. However, since the designs and costs of these plants are largely outdated, some having been prepared 20 years ago, the reliability of the cost estimates varies widely. Investment selection then faces the problem of updating the cost of projects to place them, as well as thermal options, on comparable basis. In particular, it is difficult to update in a reliable and efficient manner, costs of hydro projects which have been prepared by different engineers under diverse assumptions. 4.3 In the case of Brazil, several factors complicate these estimates, which are: * the instability shown by the economy with periods of high inflation rates, which led to several changes of currency in the last 20 years, . fluctuating exchange rates due to government interference in the market, local currency sometimes undervalued and at other times overvalued, * changes in the composition of the basket for estimating inflation factors, * the vast hydro potential of the country which requires the study of a large number of projects, each with more than one alternative which should be simultaneously studied, . some features of current legislation, mostly with regard to labor costs and environmental protection. 22 Cost of Hydro Projects 4.4 The ESMAP study considered it necessary to review the methodology for updating costs of hydro plants and try to develop a method for estimating the range of uncertainty that current ELETROBRAS estimates may have. To this end the services of a Brazilian Consultant (HIDROSERVICE) were secured to review current ELETROBRAS procedures for updating cost of hydro projects and define a variation range into which sensitivity analyses should be made. The study entailed the review of a sample of existing projects, their total costs and the factors which could be affected by new procedures for costs estimates. On this basis, the study was able to: * define the historic variations of implementation cost of projects and make a critical review of the procedures used for updating such costs, * estimate the possible influence of modem construction methods if applied in the future to new projects, * estimate the extent to which savings could be made by the implementation of projects by private enterprises 4.5 The study aimed at providing key adjustment parameters which would permit the definition of a range of confidence for the current cost estimates of the hydro projects contained in the ELETROBRAS catalogue of projects. The work was based on the main characteristics of sixteen projects, selected by ELETROBRAS and are deemed to be representative of the whole set of projects. The sample included plants with installed capacity between 22 MW and 1800 MW. 4.6 Estimates were based on current local costs of civil works and international prices for equipment duly corrected by price inflation and local factors. The factors included: Historical Variations of Cost Estimates 4.7 This review comprised the following stages: Selection of Price Indices. It was found that the methods used traditionally by ELETROBRAS to update costs, on the basis of CPIs published by the G. Vargas Foundation is flawed, primarily because the structure of costs of an hydro plant is not necessarily reflected by the CPI. The study then defined a set of fifteen indices which better reflect the cost structure of different types of civil works, mechanical and electrical equipment, and engineering services. Fourteen of these indices are published in Brazil and the fifteenth, which represent costs of turbines and generators, is published by the US Bureau of Reclamation. * Transposition of Indices to a Uniform Basis. Series of indices for the period 1974-1995 were collected and placed on uniform basis. * Testing the Procedures. Indices developed were applied to several cases. 23 * Results. The application of ELETROBRAS updating method and the method developed for the ESMAP study show that cost of hydro projects have been overvalued by about 20-30%. Influence of Modern Construction Methods 4.8 Based on the main characteristics of the sample, the study estimated the extent for which there is room for introducing new construction techniques which would result in cost reductions. The results were however inconclusive. The only new technique found to have meaningful cost saving was the use of rolled concrete (rollcrete) in dams, which could result in reductions of up to 5% in the total costs of a project. However, the use of rollcrete could increase the cost of associated works, resulting in an overall negligible effect. Expected Efficiency Gains in Project Implementation 4.9 It is expected that most of generation in Brazil will be developed by private investors in the future. In view of this the study tried to estimate to what extent project implementation by commercially oriented companies would result in a more efficient, lower cost implementation, in contrast with the traditional implementation by government and state owned utilities. It was found that savings could be achieved mostly through: (i) increasing the efficiency of the design and supervision processes and, (ii) use of more competitive contracting procedures. However, these factors were found difficult to quantify and were not accounted for in the analysis, which in turn represents a conservative assumption. Environmental Costs 4.10 The study considered the trend of new policies established by ELETROBRAS with regard to enviromnental protection and its influence in future costs of projects. It is expected that environmental costs will increase because of safeguards implied by new enacted legislation and the pressure of NGOs. Also in this case, quantification was not possible. Conclusions 4.11 The above studies concluded that: * the cost estimates of hydro projects whose basic designs were prepared in the 1980's are better represented when applying the updated methodology which considers fifteen selected price indices, instead of the CPI traditionally used by ELETROBRAS. . results of the application of ELETROBRAS' updating method and the method developed for the ESMAP study show that cost of hydro projects are generally overvalued for about 20%-30%. 4.12 These conclusions were taken into account in the developing of expansion plans by including sensitivity analyses with up to 30% lower than currently estimated costs for hydro projects. 24 5 COSTS OF THERMAL OPTIONS 5.1 This section summarizes the costs and characteristics of the thermal options used for the study. It draws heavily on a recent study prepared by SPG which incorporates good quality data on the cost of thermal options3, and which was provided through ELETROBRAS for use in this study. The cost estimates of thermal installations are conservative as they assume a degree of inefficiency due to lack of extensive involvement of private sector in implementing power projects in Brazil. Once private sector gains experience, the costs could be expected to coincide more closely with those reported in developed countries. Selection of Thermal Candidates 5.2 Given the predominantly hydro characteristics of the SSE system, there is -- and there will be for many vears ahead-- enough peaking capacity in the system and thus capacity adiitions (in particular thermal additions) need to be designed for base load operation. Preliminary screening studies showed that peaking options such as open cycle combustion turbines would not be selected by the optimization program and were thus discarded. 5.3 To ensure a consistent comparison between the different thermal options for system expansion. three base load thermal plant alternatives using proven technologies, standard design and appropriate sizes to ensure economy of scale were selected. Fuel sources were assumed to be available (local and imported coal and gas) and plants would be constructed on greenfield sites but close to the existing electrical system. 5.4 The following thermal options for system generation expansion were selected: * gas fueled combined cycle (CC) thermal plants in modules of 907 MW, * steam thermal plants using imported coal, in modules of 744 MW, and . fluidized bed combustion (FBC) steam thermal plants using domestic coal, in modules of 125 MW. "Bolivia" - Brazil Integrated Gas Project: Prospects for the Introduction of Gas-Fired Power Plants in S/SE/MW Brazil" - June 1995. 25 5.5 A broader range of alternatives would have unnecessarily complicated the study without adding value. 5.6 For Combined Cycle and stearn thermal plants, the largest sizes compatible with the safe and reliable operation in accordance with international practices were selected. The large size of the system would comfortably accept plants in the 700-900 MW range. For FBC plant, current technology does not go much over 125 MW, which was the selected plant size. The selection of coal based thermal generation follows recommnendations of a study prepared by ELETROBRAS in 19934 which concluded that, given the poor quality of local coals and the need to maintain environmental safeguards, no conventional steam plants should be installed based on domestic coals, but only FBC plants which are considered a clean coal technology. Thermal options using imported coal would have no such restrictions as this coal would be low sulfur and ash, and emission control equipment could be installed to comply with environmental regulations prevailing in Brazil. 5.7 The cost and operational characteristics of thernal plants were taken from SGP study. Direct costs are estimated at 1995 price level and include purchase of equipment, erection and contractors' services assuming turn-key arrangements and reasonable physical and price contingencies but exclude taxes. Facilities included in the cost estimates are site, enclosures, buildings, electromechanical equipment, water intake, treatment and cooling facilities, electrical yard and substation, connecting transmission lines, security and fire protection systems, fuel and water storage tanks, and air quality control equipment in compliance with national standards. The main data of these plants is presented in the Annex, Table A-1. Gas Fueled Combined Cycle Plants 5.8 These plants would be factory assembled "topping cycle" arrangements of combustion gas turbines of advanced technology, heat recovery steam generators and condensing steam turbine generators. Fuel would be natural gas or No. 2 fuel oil. The plant efficiency at 80% load would be 50%. Natural gas would be available with the chemical conditions and pressure to meet manufactures' requirements. The installed capital costs of the plants were estimated by SPG at US$663/KW excluding IDC, US$742/KW including IDC, and US$824/KW based on the firm capacity of the plants (obtained by dividing the net installed capacity by the annual availability factor of the plant). An allowance of US$395/MW (about US$1.3/MMBTU) was added to this to cover the average cost of gas transport through the import pipeline to Sao Paulo at a pipeline utilization factor' of about 55%. This results in a total unit cost for firn available energy of US$1,21 91KW. "Piano Nacional de Energia Eletrica 1993-2015; Projeto 4; A Oferta de Energia Eletrica; Carvao Mineral"; Eletrobras, 1993. A higher pipeline utilization factor would result in a lower gas transport cost to Sao Paulo 26 Steam Thermal Plants 5.9 The technology assumed would feature a thermal steam generator and condensing steam turbine generator of proven conventional but state-of-the-art reheat steam conditions. The plant efficiency at 80% load would be 36%6. Fuel would be low sulfur imported coal pulverized for injection into the burner. The steam generator would be mounted in structural steel but not enclosed. Coal would be available at the site, but coal marine fuel handling facilities and delivery system as well as in site storage facilities are included as part of the project. Pollution control would include electrostatic precipitator for removal of particles. Flue gas scrubbers would be used for reduction of sulfur-dioxide emissions. The installed capital costs of the plants were estimated by SPG at USS997/KW excluding IDC, US$1,274/KW including IDC, and US$1,516/KW based on the firm capacity of the plants. Fluidized Bed Combustion Plants 5.10 These plants were considered the only option for using locally produced coals because this technology would be the only one to be able to handle high level sulfur coals wAithout major detrimental environmental effects. The size of the plants was selected at 125 MW because the technology is currently proven only for rather small size plants. Local coals would be burned mixed with locally produced limestone in a turbulent combustion bed. Heat recovery would be made by conventional steam cycle. Particulates would be removed from by separation and ash recycle and from the flue gas by precipitators. The efficiency of the plant at 80% load would be 36%. The fulll capital costs including IDC and based on firm capacity were estimated at US$ 2,5441KW. Clearly these plants would not be economically viable. Operational Parameters 5.11 For the purpose of defining the optimum system expansion, gas fueled thermal plants were assumned to operate under contracts with minimum take-or-pay of 80%.. For this reason the system operations assume that the plants would be operating even under circumstances of favorable hydrological conditions in which some of the hydro plants, either existing or new, would be spilling water, This assumption is pessimistic in the sense that the operation of the electrical system is sub-optimal. In practice it is expected that the system would use essentially all available hydro which cannot be stored, with gas fueled thermal displacing hyrdro in such cases. Generation Costs for Thermal Options 5.12 On the basis of data indicated above, the competitivity of gas fueled options is clearly superior to the coal based options (for a 10% discount rate). The total base load operational costs of thermal plants would be as shown in Table 5.1: 6 A conservative assumption. Modern steam plants are expected to reach 38-40% efficiency. 27 Table 5.1 Differences in Generation Costs for Base Load Operation (US$IMWh) Thermal Options Plano 2015 ESMAP Study Natural Gas 61 29 Imported Coal 57 44 Brazilian Coal 64 63 28 6 OPTIMUM SYSTEM EXPANSION 6.1 This section summarizes the methods and assumptions used for defining the system optimum expansion. The objective of a power expansion planning study is to determine a sequence of capacity additions and transmission expansions which will meet the forecast electricity demand under specific reliability criteria. The process is intended to find the least cost option which would minimize the present value of the investment, operation and maintenance costs. It is based on the demand forecast and selects the best expansion sequence by selecting, from a catalogue of viable options, the least cost solution through an optimization process. The results define the timing, amount and location of additions to the existing system. Usually, the exercise needs to consider financial, geographical and environmnental constraints, which adds to the complexity of an already complex problem. Planning Methodology and Criteria 6.2 The Brazilian power system presents two complications for the analysis, which are its large size and the predominance of hydro power. In order to simulate the expansion, the study used the current ELETROBRAS' methodological approach, which comprises: (i) the preparation of the. demand forecast, (ii) the long term expansion optimization of the system using a linear programnning model, and (iii) the medium term detailed simulation and optimization of selected configurations through the use of a dynamic programming model. Previous decisions with regard to the economic parameters and assumptions are required as inputs to the methodology. Economic Parameters 6.3 The important economic parameters used for the study are the economic cost of gas and coals used for the thermal options, the discount rate and the exchange rate, which are described below: Gas Price 6.4 Natural gas imports from Bolivia could be available to supply thermal power plants in the SSE region by 1999. In the longer term, additional gas could be available 29 from the development of new discoveries in Brazil, from new discoveries in Bolivia, from North Argentina, or as imported LNG. This leads to the following potential sources: (i) Gas imported from Bolivia under the current agreement between PETROBRAS and YPFB; (ii) Gas from existing fields in Brazil, comprising associated gas from Campos fields and free gas from the Merluza field in Santos basin; (iii) Gas from future discoveries in Brazil (and Bolivia); (iv) Complementary volumes through additional pipeline supplies from North Argentina, or possibly Peru; and (v) LNG imports. 6.5 With respect to the first source, Bolivia has sufficient volumes of known econornically deliverable reserves (at the sales contract price agreed between PETROBRAS and YPFB), to meet in full the supply agreement with Brazil for at least 10 to 12 years, after which there would be some shortfall. However, there is good exploration potential for new discoveries in Bolivia with less than 20% of the country having been explored. If Bolivia continues with the past level of exploration effort, it should be possible to build up sufficient reserves to meet the contractual volumes for Brazil for the 20 years specified in the supply agreement. For the gas supplies to be made available under this supply agreement, a benchmark cost of about 1.27 US$/MMBTU (8.7 US$/MWh) was assumed. This includes the cost of gas (the conmmodity) to the inlet to the pipeline of 1.1 US$/MMBTU, and with the remainder covering the cost of local distribution to the power facility in Brazil. The average cost of transmission from Bolivia to Sao Paulo was taken as US$1.3/MMBTU, which is a conservatively high estimate if the pipeline is to be operated at high utilization factors. 6.6 The economic cost of gas from second and third sources (already producing fields in Campos and Santos and new discoveries'in SSE Brazil) is subject to'much uncertainty, but includes the Average Incremental Cost (AIC) of gas production plus a Depletion Cost. Levelised over the planning period, the economic cost is broadly estimated at between 1.5 and 2.0 US$/MMBTU, which is less than the cost of Bolivian gas delivered to SSE Brazil when long distance transmission costs are taken into account. Therefore, in view of the limited volumes of gas to be made available under the current agreement with Bolivia (up to 16 MMCMD), the cost gas was fixed at the delivered cost of Bolivian gas 1.27 US$/MMBTU for the first tranch of gas fired generation capacity (2 x 907 MW units consuming about 8 MMCMD assuming Combined Cycle plants operating at base load). This cost of gas represents a conservative assumption since using a lower cost of gas (to represent a true weighted average cost of Bolivian and domestic gas), would only serve to increase the economic viability for incremental gas fired capacity. 6.7 With respect to the fourth and fifth sources (incremental imports from Argentina, and as LNG), these will all cost equal to or more than the first sources. Future 30 volumes delivered from Argentina via flow reversal through the existing Argentina- Bolivia pipeline will be higher cost to reflect higher transportation costs over longer distances. Imported LNG may become a feasible in medium to long term, and although the border price of LNG delivered to the SSE would be higher than that of pipeline gas from Bolivia and Argentina, there would be less capital investment required in pipelines. LNG could be imported from existing plants in Africa, or future plants in Latin America. LNG imported from Nigeria, Algeria, Venezuela or South Argentina has a benchmark reference price regasified on the Brazilian coast of US$3.30/MMBTU in 1995, and could be assumed to increase by about 1% per year until 2010. This increase assumes that the intemational transaction price of gas, indexed on a mix of low sulfur fuel oil and gas oil, will roughly follow the price of crude oil. 6.8 Although the above estimates of the cost of gas delivered to SSE Brazil are inherently approximate. they are sufficient to lead to robust conclusions with respect to the viability of increments of gas fired thermal generation in the SSE. For the first two gas fueled power plants, the cost of gas at the plant gate was fixed at 1.27 US$/MMBTU corresponding to the cost of Bolivian gas as noted above and excluding gas transmission costs. For subsequent plants, the cost of gas (the commodity) delivered to power plants in the SSE was assurned to be 30% higher. Other Economic Parameters 6.9 A discount rate of 10% p.a. was used, with sensitivity analyses using 15% p.a. The costs excluded taxes, duties, and allowances for integrating nationally manufactured equipment Xwhich usually results in cost increases, this a price base on December 1994. Power Demand Scenario 6.10 The power demand forecast used was that considered to be the most likely, known as the Scenario II of the official ELETROBRAS Plano 2015. For the SSE system this corresponds to an average consumption growth of 4.1 % p.a. for the period 1996 - 2005. Sensitivity Analyses 6.11 Sensitivity analyses were made with respect to the discount rate as noted above. For the project costs, the costs of hydro used were 30% lower than ELETROBRAS' current estimates to test the robustness of the gas fueled options to low cost hvdro. Long Term System Optimization 6.12 This consisted of a long term analysis of the system expansion, using as a base ELETROBRAS' Plano 2015 but modifying key parameters for different options as appropriate. 6.13 ELETROBRAS' methodology for long term expansion planning is based on a linear programming model, DESELP. This solves the problem of defining the expansion 31 option which results in the minimum present value of investment, operation (including fuel usage), and maintenance of the system. The problem is formulated in linear programming techniques which include variables for demand, supply, maximum flow through transmissions lines, and the operational characteristics and economic parameters of thermal and hydro plants. 6.14 The system is modeled as three regions linked by transmission lines, and these lines are represented by their individual unit costs and transmission capacities. The transmission expansion is then a solution recommended by the model. Thermal and hydro plants are represented individually by their guaranteed energy, installation cost (including the incremental cost of additional installed capacity), annual cost of operation and maintenance, fuel costs and other operational data. The demand is represented by a load curve, assimilated to a three stage ladder. 6.15 Because of the large number of parameters used as constraints in the model, the procedure was simplified through simulation in periods of five years over the time horizon 1996-2025. Thus, the simulation defines the system configuration at the end of period, without analyzing in detail the system configuration within the 5 year period. Case Studies 6.16 The case studies analyzed are indicated in Table 6.1: Table 6.1 Case Studies Analyzed Case Name Hydro Costs Thermal Discount Rate Costs Plano 2015 EB EB 10% Alternative 1 (Al) EB SPG 10% Alternative 2 (A2) -30% SPG 10% Alternative 3 (A3) EB SPG 15% Alternative 4 (A4) -30% SPG 15% Results 6.17 The results of the simulations are summarized in Table 6.2 and indicate that, for the Plano 2015 case study, therrnal options would not compete with hydro before the period 2016-2020, and then the best option would be imported coal. For the other case studies, the optimization process recommends increments of gas fueled generation between 2000 and 2005 primarily due to the cost of fuel assumed for gas generation capacity in the simulations. 32 Table 6.2 Results of the Long Term Simulation Elvolution of Available Generation Capacity (GW) Period Resource Plano Case Studies 2015 Al A2 1 A3 A4 Hydro 66.6 66.2 63.1 66.2 66.4 2000 Coal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gas 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Hydro 87.3 69.1 81.8 68.7 76.8 2005 Coal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gas 0.0 7.7 3.4 10.6- 6.8 Hydro 105.6 64.3 87.1 70.1 82.9 2010 Coal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gas 0.0 18.7 10.7 20.0 14.6 Hydro 131.1 84.3 100.5 76.8 110.4 2015 Coal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 - Gas 0.0 24.9 16.6 27.2 21.1 Hydro 153.4 100.5 121.5 109.2 123.8 2020 Coal 2.9 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 Gas 0.0 27.2 23.0 27.2 27.2 Hydro 163.1 131.0 145.8 127.4 152.6 2025 Coal 16.2 7.5 0.0. 21.2 1.0 Gas 0.0 27.2 27.2 27.2 27.2 6.18 With respect to the above results, the following observations can be made: Plano 2015 * Gas fueled thermal option is not contemplated neither in the SSE nor in the South system • Imported Coal option appears only in 2020 (with about 4,000 MW) in the SE region. 33 * Imported Coal option appears in the S and NE regions in 2025 (with about 1,000 MW and 4,000 MW respectively) Case AI * Gas option is competitive from 2005, substituting some hydro plants and all coal. Highest demand is in the SE region, with about 6,600 MW in 2005 and 9,070 MW -- which is the maximum available-- in 2010. In other regions the gas is demanded progressively reaching the maximum available in 2025. Imported coal appears only in 2025 both in the S and SE regions, but only when gas availability is exhausted --which indicates that thermal is better than hydro and gas is better than coal. Case A2 * Imported coal option disappears due to the reduction of hydro costs. C Gas fueled option still good option, but installation is displaced by- one period (5 years) despite lower hydro costs. * more hydro is demanded with regard to Alternative 1 (Case Al), which shows that some hydro projects are very competitive under these assumptions. CaseA3 3 Coal option appears more competitive starting in 2015 reaching about 9,000 MW in 2020 and 21,000 MW in 2025. Coal appears more competitive for discount rates over 10%. - * Demand for gas fueled therrnal remains within the levels of Alternative 1 (Case Al) which shows that this option is not sensible to the discount rate, in other words coal enters to substitute the most expensive hydro. CaseA4 Gas option still shows strong, though there is a small reduction of gas demand in the SE in 2005 from 10,600 MW to 6.800 MW due to cheaper hydro. Beyond 2010 gas options retake a pace similar to the one without cost reductions for hydro up to exhausting availability. * Coal option disappears because of lower costs of hydro. * This solutions seems robust with regard to hydro, which fills out all remaining demand within gas supply limitations. 34 System Simulation Simulation Characteristics 6.19 System simulation studies have the purpose of providing a finer definition of system configuration and expansion costs, and are based on the results of the long term optimization discussed above. The system simulation was made using MODDHT, Hydro Thernal Dispatch Model, which is a module of the OLADE-IDB model for electricity expansion planning (known as SUPER OLADE/BID model). MODDHT is able to design an operational policy and simulate the operation of an hydro thermal system. 6.20 The system is represented as a set of sub-systems interconnected by transmission lines. For the SSE system, two sub-systems are represented on the basis of current transfer limitations. These subsystems are the South East and the South. Each sub-system is considered as one hydro plant, equivalent to the integration of the set of hydro plants existing in the sub-system and several thermal plants, which may be equivalent or individual plants. The "equivalent" hydro plant represents the set of hydro plants of each sub-system, and has an "equivalent" reservoir. 6.21 Thermral plants are grouped by class into those plants which have similar production characteristics (fuel, efficiency, O&M costs). On the basis of input data, the model calculates a set of operating data for each class of thermal plant, such as capacity, unit generation cost, forced and scheduled maintenance. Energy demand is represented for each node as the integrated load of the area represented in the node through main parameters of the load curve: power demand for characteristic steps of the curve. Nodes are interconnected by lines, characterized by flow transfer capacity for each month and losses indices as a percentage of the flow. 6.22 Operational policies are based on the marginal cost of water (MCW), which represents the economic value of water storage. System operation can be simulated either by the historic sequence of water inflows or for synthetic series generated by stochastic methods for the same model. In both cases the model uses the same algorithm to simulate the system operation each month and hydrological sequence. This algorithm, called Monthly Balance, provides for supplying the power required for each step of system demand curve taking into account supply capability and costs from all energy sources, the cost of non-supplied energy, the transfer capacity and the losses of interconnections. Results of Inclusion of Gas Fueled Options in the System 6.23 The first phase long term system optimization above demonstrated the economics of including gas fueled thermal options in the system over the period 1996- 2025. The second phase carried out detailed simulations of the system operations for a medium term period of fifteen years. It analyzed the total development costs and the system operation through submitting four different options for the system development. These options are concrete, plant by plant, year by year development plans based on the general directions given by the long term optimization study. These four options were designed by ELETROBRAS to fit the system requirements with differing hydro and 35 thermal content and were designated: (i) hydro, (ii) thermal, (iii) higher thermal, and (iv) higher hydro. 6.24 Common features of the four scenarios are: (i) it is assumed that the SSE system and the North system would become interconnected in the year 2000 with a interconnection capacity limit of 1,000 MW, and (ii) a basic set of gas fueled plants would become part of the system with a first 907 MW plant installed in the SE system in January 1999, followed and a second 907 MW unit installed in January 2000. This is because, having demonstrated that gas plants are economic and given the increasing risk of energy shortages in the short term, the gas fired plants offered the most economic options for meeting the deficits together with the shortest implementation periods. 6.25 The results of the studies show that a higher participation of gas fueled thermal plants in the development of the SSE system with regard to options considered in the Plano 2015 would be economically justified. The total costs of options with higher participation of gas are considerably lower than those which do not consider gas. The participation of gas fueled plants in the four cases tested are shown in Table 6.3, and Table 6.4 (a) - (d). Table 6.3 Gas Fueled Thermal Plants Scheduling Unit/Case Hydro Thermal Higher Thermal Higher Hydro 1 Jan 1999 Jan 1999 Jan 1999 Jan 1999 2 Jan 2000 Jan 2000 Jan 2000 Jan 2000 3 Jul. 2007 Jan 2002 Jan 2002 4 Jul. 2008 Jan 2003 Jan 2003 5 Jul. 2009 Jan 2009 Jan 2005 6 Jul. 2010 Jan 2010 Jan 2007 7 - - Jan 2009 8 - - Jan 2010 36 TABLE 6.4(a) Detailed Simulation Results GN: 1999 (907 MW) 2000 (907-M'4) - INTERLIGA(AO 2000 (1000 MW) - Caso Hidro ANO SUL SE/C.OESTE NORTE I NORDESTE 1995 ... 1996 04 - Des. Jordio I1I - J. Lacerda TN' 1997 1 0- Corumnb I - OD OS - Guiban T11- Crui-na 1998 01- Miranda 01 - Coru nbit I 05 - Serra da Mesa 0? - Caneas I 1999 01 - Cormb I - GN 01 - GNSE-1 07 - Iti 01- Santa Branca 07 - Salto Caxias 01 - Canoas IT 01 - Igarapava 01 - Porto Estrd1a 06- P. Primavera 06 - Sobragi 07 -Augra-fl 2000 01 - Corumbi 2 - GN 01 - Int N ->1000OMW 01 -Int SE-> 1000MW 01 - Jacni 01 - GNSE-2 02 - Cubabtuo-l 01- Funil-Grande 08 - D. Frncisca 07 - Bocaina 10 - C Grnde I - GN 09 - Rosal 10- C. Grande 2 - GN ___ 2001 10 - C Grande 3 - GN 04 - Sapucai - 04 - SimnpLicio 2002 07 - Garabi 01- Manso 02 - Tucurni 11 01 - Pedra do Cavalo 01 - Piraju 02 - mnt NE-> 2480NW 01 - Macei6 04 - Cmn Brav 02 - Saces 04 - Capim Branco 02 - Lnt N -> 1370M.NM 04- Funil-Ribeira 08 - Itapebi 04- Anta 04 - Baguani I 10 - Franca Amams 2003 01 - Campos Novos 01 - Picada 01 - Int NE -: 2600!W 04 - Corumbi 3 - GN 01 - Bau I 10 - Mac2dianbo 01 - REPLAN-1 10 : C Grande 4 - GN 04- Queunado 04-C. --Magalhies 04 - Formoso 04 - Viradooro 04 - Itsocam 04 - Resplendor 11 04 - Serra do Facao 2004 01 - Candiota- 01 - Pilar I 01 - Int NE -> 2690MW 04 - Araci 04 - Corumbi 4 - GN 04 - Barretos 04 - S. Qoebrada 06- -xatbho 04 - Peise 07 - Ceboljo 04 - Batatal 10 - C. GrdWe S - GN 04 - Mmm2 10 - C Grande 6 - GN 2005 07 - Sao Jernumo 04 - Barra do Peise 04 - Int NE -> 300OMW 01 - G'-l 10 - C Grande 7 - GN 04 -.Manhuaiu 10 - C. Grande 8 - GN 04 - Jaborandi 2006 07- -aMa 04- F. do Bezema 04 -Lajeado 10- Fundio ____F._do_ __zerr_t_________o 2007 07 - Tdeuaco Borba 01 - Angra III 04 - FEstreito 01 - GN-11 07 - F. Chapcozinho 07 - GNSE-3 07 - Carvio-PI- - 10 - Barra Grande _ |__ _ 2008 07 - Curucaca 04 - Tornori |u 01 - GN-11l 07 - Abelaxio Lu 07 - GNSE-4 10 - Ivatnva _ _ _ 2009 01 - Carvio-PI-2 04 - Mlirador 04T - Tupi-atits 01 - GN-IV 07 - Xanxeri 07 - GNSE-S5 _ 10 - Fox do Alonzo 2010 01 - Carva-PI-3 04- Aimores 07 -S. Domingos 07 - GNSE-6 _ 07 - Ubauna ] _ . 37 TABLE 6.4(b) Detailed Simulationi Results GN: 199 (907 MWv) 2000 (907MW) - INVMRLIGA(AO 2000 (1000 MfW) - Caso Gia ANO SUL SE/COESTE j NORTE NORDESTE 1995_. 1996 04 - Desv. Jordio I I - J. Lxcerds IV 1997 1 10 - Corwb1i I - OD 05 - Gulnn - Cunra-Una 1998 010-1M-ira 01 - Corimbd I OS - Sema da Mesa 07 - Canoas I 1999 01- Conruht I - GN 01 - GNSE1 07 - tIt 01 - Santa Brn 07 - Sd_to _ Can_ 01 - Canoas II el - Igampavas 01 - Porto Estrels 06- P. P e 06 - Sobragi 07- Angra-__ 2000 01 - Corwnbi 2 - GN 01 - Int N ->I OOOMW 01 -Iot SE ->IOOMW 01 - JUi 01 - GNSE-2 02 - Cubet4o-Sa 01- Funil-Grande 08- D. Francrca 07 - Boca 10 - C G.nde 1- GN 09 - Rosal 10 -CGrnde2-GCN _ 200t2 0-CG e3-G 2002 10 - Garb 01 - Mano 02 - Tucurni II 01 - Pedra de C>>vaio 01 - Pirju 02 - Int NE -> 2480MW 01 - .Maci6 01 - GNSE-3 02 - Sacos 07 - Sapucaia 02 - Int N -> 1370NMN 07 - Simplio 08 - itapebi 07 - frape 10 - Cana Brava I _______ __________________ 11 - Funil-Ribeira 2003 04 - Cornmbo 3 - GN 01 - Picad 01 - lIt NE > 2600MW 10 - C Grwe 4 - GN 01 - Baii I 01 - REPLAN-1 01 - GNSE-4 | ~~~~~~~~~0.4 - Quenado 07 - Ana 2004 01 - Candlota-1 01- Pilar I 01 - Int NE -> 2690MNW 04 -A,ci 01 - po$ NovoS 01 - Capin Branco 04 - S. Quebrada 04 - Corumab 4 - GC. 01 - Franca Amaral 10- MsCfUkdkbo 10 -C GrAde 5-G IO - C. Gande 6 - GS 2005 01 - Jatiziho 01 - Barmrtos 04 - Int.NE 300OO.%fVV 01 - GN-I 07 - Cebolio 01 - Fonnoso 10 - SAJe. o 04 - Viradouro 10 - C Grde7 - GN 04 - C.Magaes 10 - C Grande 8 - GN 04 - Baguari I 04 - Serrx do Facio 04 - Peiue 04- Iteocara 2006 07 -Mai 01 - Batal 04 - Lajeado ____ |__ 10 - FwidUo 01 - Respiendor If 2007 07 - Telnbco Borba 04 - Barr do Peixe 04 -Estreito 01 - GN-11 07 - F. Chapuenhbo 04-.Marta 07 - Carvio.PI-1 10 - Barra Grande 2008 10 - Carvio-PI-2 01 - Manhnau 01 - GN-II1 01 - Angra III __________ _ 04- F. do Bezerra 2009 07 - Carvio-P-.3 01 - Jaborandi 04 - Tupirtia 01 - Gs-IV 01 - GNSE-S 2010 07 - Carvao-PI4 01 - GNSE-6 2011 i - 38 TABLE 6.4(c) Detailed Simulation Results GN: 199 (907 MWNN) 2000 (907MWV) - IN'TERLUCAC.A 2000 (1000 MW%) - Caso Mais Cis - 04 A_N i SUL SFJCOESTE NORTE NORDESTE 1995 | 1996 | 04 - D__v. Jord_o . __E 3 - J. L acerda 1_ 1997 1 10 - Corunba 1 - OD 05 - Guiinan Il - Cbrua-U_ns 01 - tiranda 01 - Corumbhi I 05 - Serra da Miesa ________ _________________ 07 - Canoas I 1999 01 - Corambt I - GN 01- GNSE-1 07 -It 0l - SantaBranca 07 - Saito Ca 01 - Canoas 11 01 - Igarapava 01 - Porto Estrela 06 - P. Prinavera 06- Sobzagi 07 - Angra-11 2000 1 01 - Coniba 2 - C.N 01 - Int N- 1000'M 01 -Ent SE -> 1000.MW> 01 - Jacui 01 - GNSE-2 02 - Cubuio-Sul 01- Fu.n-Grande OS - D. Fraxnsca 07 - Bocaina 10 - C. Grnde I - GN 09 - Rosa |~~~I - C- Gra.nde 2 -f.N 2001 1i0 - C. Grande 3 - GN\ _ __ *00' i 10 - Carabi 0t -Manso 02 - Tucurui I0I1 - Pedra do Cavalo 01 - Piran 02 - Int LNE ->24so.IfN 0t - .Mac6i 01 - GNSE-3 02 - Sacos 07 - Sapoceit. 02 - Ent.N -> 137 0.MW 07 - Silmp3icio 0S - It2pebi 07- Irape 10- Cans Brava I _ : t ~~~~~~~I - Funil-Ribeira 2003 04 - Cormb 3 - GN 01 - Picada 01 - IntE-> 2600M' 10 -CGrande4-N 01 -Bali 031 - 32EPLA.N-1 01 - GNRLSEL4 , _ ~~~~~~~04 - Queimao ________ __________________ _ 07 - A nts 2004 01 - Candiota- - Pilar I 01 - Ent NE -> 2690OMnv 04 - kz-a,a 01 - Campos INovos 01 - Capim Branco 04 - Lajeado 04 - Corwnbi 4 - GN 01 - Franca Armral 10 -Machadibo 04- Fornoso |10 - C Grande 5 - GN 1 10 - C Grande 6 - GN 2005 j0I- Jasho 01 - GNSE-S 04 - S. Quebrada 01 - G:N- 107 - Ceboho 04 - Int NE-> 3000MW j0-SAoJs'ernubno 10-C-Grade 7-CN I 10-C Grwnde 8-OGN _ 2006 0 O- -Ms 04- Barretn 10 - Fundo 04 - NIradoaro 0O - C. MlAa ilheS I ; ~~~~~~04 - .Serra do Facao G i 1 04~~~~~O- - ltaocarm 2007 07 - Carvao-P[-I 01 - GNSE-6 |04 -Estreito 01 - G,N-I1 04 - Baj!uari I 04- Peixe 04 - Batatal ________ |_________________ _ 04- Respiendor 11 _ _ 2008 1 1 07 -A.nl!f 111 01 -ON-F11 2009 0 1 -GNSE-7 0.4-Tupir-atin 0 1GN-11 2010 01 - Carvio,-PI-Z 01 - GNSE-8 07 - Carvio-P-3 1 201 1 39 TABLE 6.4(d) Detailed Simulation Results GN: 1999 (907 MW) 2000 (907M*W) - INTERLIGA(AO 2000 (1000 MW) - Caso B.MNoote ANO SUL SECOESTE NORTE NORDESTE 1995 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ 199 004 - Desv. Jorio _ _ _ _ 11 - J. L.AcerdalIV _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1997 10 - Corambi I -OD 05 - Guihna II - Curni-Una 1998 01 -Miranda 01 - ConubA I 05 - Serrt da Mesa 07 - Canoas _ 1999 01- Corumba I - GIN 01- GNSE-1 07 - t 01- Sata Branca 07 - SaftoCasias 01 - Canoasl 01 - [arapava 01 - Porto Estret 06- P. Prunaver 06 - Sobragi 07 - Anera-II 2000 01 - Connmbi 2 - GN 01 - Int N -1000.MW 01 -nt SE ->1000O 01 - JaCi 01 - GNSE-2 02 - Cubatio-Sul 01- Funil-Grande 08 - D. Francisa 07 - Bocain 10 - C. Grnde - G.N 09 - Rosal 10 - C Grnde 2 - GN _ .. __ 2001 10-C.Grande3-G NG 04 - SapUcaa 04 - Simplkio W04- Irapc 2002 07 - Garabi 01 - Manso 02 - Tucurui 11 00 - Pedra do Caislo 01 - Piraju 02 - Int NE -t2480fNV 01 -1a=ee6 04 - Cana Bi 02- Sacos 04 - Capim Branco 02 - lt N -> 1370MWV 04 - Fmwil-Ribeira 08 - Itapebi 04-Ama 04 - Bagu I 10 - Franca, Anwara_ Z003 01 - Camupos Noves 01 - Picada 01 - Int NE -> 2600MvNW 04 - Corunbi 3 - GN 01 - Bad I 10- Machdinho 01 - REPLAN-1 ! l - CGrande 4 - GN 04 - Queirdo 04 - C Magalies 04- Formoso 04- VirWdouro 04- Itaocar 04 - Resplekdor 11 04 - Serra do Facao _ 2004 01- Candiota-l 01 - Pilar I 01 - lnt NE-> 2690MV 04- .mca 04 - Corumbi 4 - G.S 04 - Barretos 04 - S. Quebrada 06 - JaLaizinho 04 - Peue 07 - Cebolio 04 - Balal 10 - C Grande 5 - G 04 -Marta 10 - C. Grnde 6 - GN 2005 07 - Sio Jer6amno 04 - Barm do Peute 04 - lnt NE -> 3000.Mfw 01 - G.N-I 10 - C Grande 7 - GN 04 -Manhu;u 10 - C Grande 8 - GN 04 - Jaborandi 2006 07- Masi 04 - F. do Bezerra 04 - Lajeado 10- Fundioo 2007 01 - Int SE -> 5742 INv 01 - Int S-> 6033 MV 01 - Melo Mont 01 - Lnt -> 3370MWf1 01 - Lnt N ->80O.OMW 01 - Lnt SE 8SOOOMW 01- Int NE-> 5000 IW 2008 07 - Teleamaco Borba 01 - Angrm III 04 - Estreito 07 - F- Chapecozinho 10 - Bares Grande 2009 07 - Curuecs 07 - Abelardo Luz 10- Ivatva__ 2010 04 - Xnxere 07 - Foz do ,Uonzo 2011 40 Economic Evaluation 6.26 Results of the simulation runs are shown in Table 6.5. These indicate that option 3 (Higher Thermal) is the less expensive for all combinations of discount rate and assumptions regarding hydro costs, as shown in the table below, which shows the cost difference between the less expensive option (Higher Thermal) and the remaining cases. Table 6.5 Cost Differences Between Cases (US$ million - present value) Alternative Case Discount Hydro 1 2 4 Rate Cost Hydro Thernnal Higher Higher Thermal Hydro 1 10% EB 1,506 895 0 3,180 2 10% -30% 505 431 0 404 3 15% EB 1222 553 0 2822 4 15% -30% 527 286 0 1020 6.27 For the table above it should be noted that figures show Investment differences between each option and option 3. The total cost differences made up by the difference in investments plus the total operation cost. Total operation cost in turn is composed by fuel costs plus the expected value of the energy curtailed. Also each option has been structured following the criterion that the maximum risk of curtailment should be equal or below 5%, or one in twenty years. The economic value assigned to energy deficits was estimated at US$ 480/MWh; thus annual cost of deficit was evaluated multiplying the expected energy deficit by US$ 480/MWh. Operational Characteristics of Thermal Plants 6.28 Despite the fact that gas fueled thermal plants are shown to be highly competitive, their operational regime will determine the volumes and of consumption patters of gas to be consumed. To this end dynamic simulation studies with synthetic generated hydrological series were made under two different hypothesis: minimum operation level of 80% and maximum operation level of 90%; no minimum operation level and maximum operation level of 90%. 41 Imposed Minimum of 80% Plant Factor 6.29 When a minimum generation level of 80% plant factor is imposed on the gas fueled thermal plants, the actual plant factors are around 85% each year. This represents a condition of fairly steady gas consumption and would be the ideal situation for a gas supply contract between the power producer and the Bolivia-Brazil pipeline company, since it represents an efficient utilization of the dedicated pipeline capacity. This situation is unrealistic, however, since there will be cases under favorable hydrological conditions when the thermal power plants are consuming imported gas when some hydro plants would be spilling water No Imposed Minimum Operational Level 6.30 Without the constraint of a minimum generation level for the thermal plants, the system optimization starts by placing all available hydro energy in the system in an optirnum way. Only the gaps for ensuring system reliability are filled up with thermal generation, which results in uneven operation of the thermal plants year by year. The thermal plants may be operating at full capacity for several years in cases of prolonged drought, or may be standing idle during periods of favorable hydrological conditions. The simulations show that the average load factor of the thermal plants would be low over the time series of the analysis (Annex, Fig 5), and the average plant factor each year throughout the time series would be variable. In addition, the plant load factors depend upon the cost of gas, as shown in Table 6.6: Table 6.6 Average Plant Factor of Thermal Plants (1999-2005) P.F. (%)* P.F (%)** 1999 37 35 2000 31 29 2001 30 28 2002 32 29 2003 39 36 2004 43 40 2005 46 42 Average 37 34 Cost of Gas to Plant: * US$ I lIMwh; ** US$ 13/MWh 6.31 A particular feature of this mode of operation is that, in general, the plant factors tend to increase over time. This is because, when the system starts including more thermal capacity, the overall proportion of hydro diminishes which leaves more room for thermal generation. In the short to medium term, these operational characteristics require that gas fueled power plants are developed in conjunction with a secondary industrial market which is willing to accept the gas when not needed by the power plants. The 42 aggregate gas consumption bv the power plants and the secondary market would then be equivalent to a steady base load take from the pipeline company leading to efficient utilization of pipeline transportation capacity. The Secondary Market for Natural Gas 6.32 The concept of a secondary industrial market in this context is unusual. The thernal power generator would be obliged to take volumes of gas continuously from the pipeline company as though it were running at base load in order to fully utilize the capacity of the pipeline. However, under favorable hydrological conditions the thermal plants would be required to operate far from base load to avoid the spillage of water, and so the power producer may seek an industrial market for natural gas to ensure all gas contracted for transport from the pipeline company can be sold under all circumstances to avoid spillage of water. 6.33 The thermal power plant generators will have to pay the full firm cost of gas to the pipeline comrpany whether the plants are operating or not, comprising the reserved pipeline capacity charge plus the gas commodity charge. When the plants are not operating. the gas would be diverted to the secondary industrial consumers, and this -will require the generators entering into special gas supply contracts with these consumers. Because of the uncertainties concerning the regularity of gas supply, these industrial consumers would seek a gas price below the firm gas price, as an incentive for operating intermittently with gas. This general form of operation is likely to require some constraints on the upper limit of load factor of operation of the thermal plants (less than 50/%). in order to provide a minimum load factor of supply which would be acceptable to the industrial consumers. The tradeoffs between these load factors, the electricity price, and the discount on gas price are matters of commercial negotiation for the investors and industrial consumers. Although this concept will not produce an absolute optimum mode of operation from the perspective of the power system, it can be a practical solution to address the near term shortfall in generating capacity in the SSE under the constraints to ensure a base load offtake of natural gas from the Bolivia pipeline. 6.34 Recent market surveys of the industrial market over the SSE indicate that there is potential to develop a secondary industrial market, where the major fuels displaced would be the higher sulfur and higher viscosity 'A' series of fuel oils. The current fuels usage of the industrial market indicates that there is potential to develop a secondarv industrial market to support up to 1,000 to 2,000 MW of gas fired thermal capacity operating in complementarity over the whole SSE within the next 5 - 10 years. However, it is noted that in developing a secondary industrial market, the gas pricing mechanism will ultimately have to recognize the enviromnental benefits of natural gas. This can be through a pollution tax on the less clean burning high sulfur fuels, or financial penalties for industries which do not operate exhaust gas cleanup facilities. In any event, the relative price of natural gas and high sulfur fuel oils displaced in the secondary industrial market will eventually have to take account of the environmental advantages of natural gas. 43 I ANNEX Table A- I The Cost of Thermal Generation Options Figure I BRAZIL - Existing Gas Pipelines Figure 2 The SSE Interconnected Power System Figure 3 Location of Existing Hydro Plants Figure 4 Location of Uncompleted and Proposed Hydro Plants Figure 5 Operational Modes of Typical Gas Fired Power Generation Plants 45 I TABLE A-1 Cost of Thermal Generation Options Gas Fueled Technology Combined Cycle Size 907 MW Maximum Capacity Factor 90% Minimum Capacity Factor 80% Investment Cost: - Baseline Cost US$ 663 /KW - Cost including IDC US$ 742 /KW - Cost of Firn Capacity (at 90% P.F.) USS 824 /KW - Cost Gas Transport US$ 395 /KW - Unit Net Cost US$ 1219 /KW O&M Fixed Cost US$ 8.0 /KW-year O&M variable Cost US$ 2.00/MWh Fuel Costs; First Two Modules USS 8.7/MWh = US$ 1.27JMMBTU Fuel Costs; Following Modules US$ 11 .3'4MWh = US$ 1.65/MMBTU Heat Value of Gas 9,400 Kcal/cubic meter Efficiency 50% note: Due to the design of the DESELP model, annual investments in plant construction incurred during the construction period are discounted to the first year of the optimization period wvith a 12% discount rate, which is the average for the discount rates used in the optimization analysis. This is sufficiently accurate and convenient, as it avoids the need to include the construction period within the optimization period. 47 TABLE A-1 Cost of Thermal Generation Options (continued) Imported Coal Fueled Technology Steam (Pulverized Coal) Size 744 MW Maximum Capacity Factor 84% Minimum Capacity Factor 50% Investment Cost including IDC US$ 1516/kW O&M Fixed Cost US$ 161kW-year O&M variable Cost US$ 3.00/MWh Fuel Costs US$ 1.73/MMBTU or 45/ton Heat Value of Coal 6,544 KcaI/kg Efficiency 36% National Coal (Candiota) Fueled Technology Fluidized Bed Combustion Size 125 MW Maximum Capacity Factor 84% Minimum Capacity Factor 50% Investment Cost including IDC US$ 25441kW O&M Fixed Cost US$ 18.3/kW-year O&M variable Cost US$ 6.1/MWh Fuel Costs US$ 9.41ton Heat Value of Coal 2,700 Kcal/kg Efficiency 36% 48 FIG. 1 - EXISTING AND PROPOSED GAS PIPELINES IBRD 28958 (IVENEZUELA>~2lN 4T~~0 COLOMBIA I OLIVI *..7 L~Roraimal PRN~ r1& *'N".- AmFA_ p8 Arazo P as B ARGENTINA Z 7 /L ear P,ioui "S\--'Acre />eobco~* \&ond6nia~ ( ~~~~Mato ~ PERU i ~~~~Grosso /Ba i.BOLI.VIA A Goi6s .---.. ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Pet%, i;ra 0 6. -4 /'' "'0 " i. i ;'ola_ M0" : inasi t 0 Rio Gronde .IFD.' ' Gerais NTI Prirrwnn~ Hoiz Mato Grondss~oADTHRA. 'N S r\~~~~Do SulER SETOSTEf Curffibffsoadu~o /'' t"E'? io200 . t . . G aind'l C pi AUGUST 1997 n III I l I ' 1a0_rX ,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. ,., .A./St 1 73 I CA) <1)1 I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~c FIGo 3 LOCATION OF EXISTING HYDRO PLANTS . . :.::::...:.a..._- 01 -Alegrete 02 - P. M-dici A/B 03 - Charqueadas 04 -Itai6ba 05 -Jacul 06 - Passo Real - 07 - Passo Fundo 9 08 - J. Lacerda A/B 2' 09 - G. B. Munhoz 10 - Segredo:I p 11 - Salto Santiago 2 12 - Salto 0§6rio 46 - M. de Moraes 013 -Alegrete 47 - Esl:- :: -i :0 i0 ;0 ; ftrito 14-G. P. Souza 48 - Jaguara 15 -A. A. Laydner 49 -Volta Grande 16 - Chavantes 50 - Porto Col6mbia 17 - L. N. Garcez 51 - Marimbondo 18 - Capivara 52 - Agua Vermelha 19- PTaquarunu 53 - liha Solteira 20 - Rosana 54 - . Sim;po 21 - Segredo ; ^ 55- -C. Dourada 22 - Tr6s lrmo os 34- Santa Cruz 56 - Itumbiara 23 - N.Avanhandava 35 - Nilo Pe -anha 57 - Nova Ponte 24 - Promiss-o 36 - . Pornbos 58 - Emborcat o 25 - lbitinga 37- P. Passos/Fontes ABC 59- TrJs Marias 26 - A. S. Lima 38 - R. Silveira 60 - CamaGari 27 - Barra Bonita 39f- Mascarenhas 61 - Xing6 28 - Carioba 40 - Salto Grande 62 - P. Afonso 1234 29 - Henry Borden 41 - 5garap6 63 - Moxot6 30 - Piratininga 1234 42 - Camargos 64 - Staparica 31 - Paraibuna 43 - Itutinga 65 - Sobradinho 32 - Funii 44 - Furnas 66 - Boa Esperan9a 33 - Angra I 45 - Caconde/E.Cunha/ 67 - Tucuruf A. S. Oliveira FIG. 4 LOCATION OF UNCOMPLETED AND PROPOSED HYDRO PLANTS -i ~ ~ i -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~7 ; '- '~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 9 78 -4 , &Cz Estudoollprjeto 51 Cosm C ODS U complcntaiooou0ampil*AsO > 3 I- UTE FLORESIA - 60 MW.. 2 -LUHE COARACY-NUNES - 27 7W 3 - UME SANTAN,A -40 MW_ 4 -1UHE CACHOEIRA PORTeEIA - 700 MW S UTE MAUA I - 50 MW 52 6 - 11E MAUA 1- 560 MW 7 - UlE APARECIDA - S0 MW 8 - UHE TUCURUi 31 - 2450 MW U-[,HE SERRA QUEBRADA - 1.328 NtW 5S - UWE RAU - 74 MW 10- U11 RIO ACRE - 60 MW 57 -1'1HE PORTO ESTRELA - 11 2 MW I i - UTE CALARI -560 hl 58 - UHE SA CARVAL1HO - 30 MW J2 - UHE SAMUEL - 43,4 MW ,5 - UHE SO3RAGl - 60 MW 13 - UHE )aNG6 - 3.000 MW 60 - VHE BARRA DO BRAZ-NA - 48 MW 14 - UHF CANA BRAVA - 450 MW 61 - UJHE AIMORES - 396 &mW 15 - UHE SACOS -1 14 MW 36 - UHF. UlNIL GRANDE - I0 MW 62 - IHF LAJES - 60 IVMW 16 - bEHE MANSO - 210 MW 37 - UHE SAPUCAIA - 300 MW 63 - UHE frAOcARA - 210 MW 17- UTHE SERRA DA MESA - 1200 MW 32 -1H4E RosANA - 320 MW 64 - UHE FRANCA AMARAL - 33 MMW 18- UHE QUEIMADO - III MW 39- UHE PORTO PRIMAVERA - 1.844, MW 65 - UrE GAS - 8I12 MW 19 - U1E CORUMBA I a 3 - 68,8 MW 40 - UHE TAQUARUC,U - 504 MW 66 - UHE FUN4IL-RIBEIERA - 150 MW 20 - UHE CORUMBA I - 375 MW 41 - UHE CANOAS I - S2,5 MW 67 - UHE CAMPINIO - 45 MM' 21 - UHE QUARTEL - 100 MW 42 - UrN ANG'RA 11- 1309 MW 68 - UlE SANTA BRANCA - 4 M W 22 - GM rrAPEB1 -375 MW 43- lUTE REPLAN I - 350 MW 69 - UHE OUR1NHOS - 44 M' 23 -UE IRAPE t 420 MW 44 - UIE JATAIfZNHO - 156 MW5 70 - UHE PIRA3U -70 MW 24 - 1LE CAMPO GRANDE I a 18- 21 MfW 45 - UHE SALTO CAXIAS - 1240 MW 71 - [HE CUBATAO SUL - 45 MWN' 25 - bEtS BOCAINA -150 MW 46 - UHE CEBOLAO - 156 MW 72 - UHE CAMPOS NOVOS - 880 MW 26 - I'm CAPIM BRANCO - 600 MW 47 - UHL ITA - 1450 MW 73 - UrE MADEIEAS - 80 Mw 27 - UHE MIRANDA - 390 MW 48 - UHE MACHADOINHO -1200 MW 74 - UHE mQUIRA I - 62 NfW 20 - UHE GUILMAWAMORIM - 140 49 - UTE JORGE LACERDA 4 - 350 M1W 75 - UHE llQblRA I I - 94 MW 29 - UHE NOVA PONTE - 510 MW 50 - UHE CARABI - 900 MV 76 - u'E CuABA I e D - 450 M 30 - UGE P'LAR - 150 MW 51- IUHE DONA FRANCISCA - 125 MW 77 - UHE PONro DA PEDRA - 176 NWV 31 - UHE ROSAL - 55 MW 52 - LTS JACU1- 35D MW 78 - UIE CORL'MBA 2e 4 - 47 MW 32 - UHE IGARAPAVA - 210 MW' 53 - IUE CANDIOrA Ill I - 350 MW%,: 79 - MlE C-GRANDE 3 e 6-0 MW 33 - UHE PICADA - 100 MW 54 - UHE CURUA-UNA - 30 MW 80 - UGE CANOAS 2- 72 ,M'W 3J - bUH TBES IRM&jOS - 646 MW 55 - tUE LAJEADO - 800 MV 81 - 1u CARVAO PIE I - 350 MRW 35 - UHE SIMPLICIO - 10D MW S2 - UBE CorINGO - 34 MW Figure 5 BRAZIL Operation Modes of Typical Gas Fired Power Generation Plant Case Load factor (%) 100 Nj II r 1 1 10( 2 100 -- - - 3 Il 4 5 6 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Note: Cases 1-5: Simulated load factor of a typical gas fired power plant operating under five dif ferent hydrological conditions. Case 6: Average plant factor simulated over a very long time horizon. ksr/cdr5/w80291 Joint UNDP/World Bank ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAMME (ESMAP) LIST OF REPORTS ON COMPLETED ACTIVITIES Region/Country Activity/Report Title Date Number SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA (AFR) Africa Regional Anglophone Africa Household Energy Workshop (English) 07/88 085/88 Regional Power Seminar on Reducing Electric Power System Losses in Africa (English) 08/88 087/88 Institutional Evaluation of EGL (English) 02/89 098/89 Biomass Mapping Regional Workshops (English) 05/89 -- Francophone Household Energy Workshop (French) 08/89 -- Interafrican Electrical Engineering College: Proposals for Short- and Long-Term Development (English) 03/90 112/90 Biomass Assessment and Mapping (English) 03190 -- Symposium on Power Sector Reform and Efficiency Improvement in Sub-Saharan Africa (English) 06/96 182/96 Angola Energy Assessment (English and Portuguese) 05/89 4708-ANG Power Rehabilitation and Technical Assistance (English) 10/91 142/91 Benin Energy Assessment (English and French) 06/85 5222-BEN Botswana Energy Assessment (English) 09/84 4998-BT Pump Electrification Prefeasibility Study (English) 01/86 047/86 Review of Electricity Service Connection Policy (English) 07/87 071/87 Tuli Block Farms Electrification Study (English) 07/87 072/87 Household Energy Issues Study (English) 02/88 -- Urban Household Energy Strategy Study (English) 05/91 132/91 Burkina Faso Energy Assessment (English and French) 01/86 5730-BUR Technical Assistance Program (English) 03/86 052/86 Urban Household Energy Strategy Study (English and French) 06191 134/91 Burundi Energy Assessment (English) 06/82 3778-BU Petroleum Supply Management (English) 01/84 012/84 Status Report (English and French) 02/84 011/84 Presentation of Energy Projects for the Fourth Five-Year Plan (1983-1987) (English and French) 05/85 036/85 Improved Charcoal Cookstove Strategy (English and French) 09/85 042/85 Peat Utilization Project (English) 11/85 046/85 Energy Assessment (English and French) 01/92 9215-BU Cape Verde Energy Assessment (English and Portuguese) 08/84 5073-CV Household Energy Strategy Study (English) 02/90 110/90 Central African Republic Energy Assessement (French) 08/92 9898-CAR Chad Elements of Strategy for Urban Household Energy The Case of N'djamena (French) 12/93 160/94 Comoros Energy Assessment (English and French) 01/88 7104-COM Congo Energy Assessment (English) 01/88 6420-COB Power Development Plan (English and French) 03/90 106/90 C6te d'lvoire Energy Assessment (English and French) 04/85 5250-IVC Improved Biomass Utilization (English and French) 04/87 069/87 Power System Efficiency Study (English) 12/87 , -- Power Sector Efficiency Study (French) 02/92 140/91 Project of Energy Efficiency in Buildings (English) 09/95 175/95 -2 - Region/Country Activity/Report Title Date Number Ethiopia Energy Assessment (English) 07/84 4741-ET Power System Efficiency Study (English) 10/85 045/85 Agricultural Residue Briquetting Pilot Project (English) 12/86 062/86 Bagasse Study (English) 12/86 063/86 Cooking Efficiency Project (English) 12/87 -- Energy Assessment (English) 02/96 179/96 Gabon Energy Assessment (English) 07/88 6915-GA The Gambia Energy Assessment (English) 11/83 4743-GM Solar Water Heating Retrofit Project (English) 02/85 030/85 Solar Photovoltaic Applications (English) 03/85 032/85 Petroleum Supply Management Assistance (English) 04/85 035/85 Ghana Energy Assessment (English) 11/86 6234-GH Energy Rationalization in the Industrial Sector (English) 06/88 084/88 Sawmill Residues Utilization Study (English) 11/88 074/87 Industrial Energy Efficiency (English) 11/92 148/92 Guinea Energy Assessment (English) 11/86 6137-GUI Household Energy Strategy (English and French) 01/94 163/94 Guinea-Bissau Energy Assessment (English and Portuguese) 08/84 5083-GUB Recommended Technical Assistance Projects (English & Portuguese) 04/85 033/85 Management Options for the Electric Power and Water Supply Subsectors (English) 02/90 100/90 Power and Water Institutional Restructuring (French) 04/91 118/91 Kenya Energy Assessment (English) 05/82 3800-KE Power System Efficiency Study (English) 03/84 014/84 Status Report (English) 05/84 016/84 Coal Conversion Action Plan (English) 02/87 -- Solar Water Heating Study (English) 02/87 066/87 Peri-Urban Woodfuel Development (English) 10/87 076/87 Power Master Plan (English) 11/87 -- Power Loss Reduction Study (English) 09/96 186/96 Lesotho Energy Assessment (English) 01/84 4676-LSO Liberia Energy Assessment (English) 12/84 5279-LBR Recommended Technical Assistance Projects (English) 06/85 038/85 Power System Efficiency Study (English) 12/87 081/87 Madagascar Energy Assessment (English) 01/87 5700-MAG Power System Efficiency Study (English and French) 12/87 075/87 Environmental Impact of Woodfuels (French) 10/95 176/95 Malawi Energy Assessment (English) 08/82 3903-MAL Technical Assistance to Improve the Efficiency of Fuelwood Use in the Tobacco Industry (English) 11/83 009/83 Status Report (English) 01/84 013/84 Mali Energy Assessment (English and French) 11/91 8423-MLI Household Energy Strategy (English and French) 03/92 147/92 Islamic Republic of Mauritania Energy Assessment (English and French) 04/85 5224-MAU Household Energy Strategy Study (English and French) 07/90 123/90 Mauritius Energy Assessment (English) 12/81 3510-MAS Status Report (English) 10/83 008/83 Power System Efficiency Audit (English) 05/87 070/87 -3- Region/Country Activity/Report Title Date Number Mauritius Bagasse Power Potential (English) 10/87 077/87 Energy Sector Review (English) 12/94 3643-MAS Morocco Energy Sector Institutional Development Study (English and French) 07/95 173/95 Mozambique Energy Assessment (English) 01/87 6128-MOZ Household Electricity Utilization Study (English) 03/90 113/90 Electricity Tariffs Study (English) 06/96 181/96 Sample Survey of Low Voltage Electricity Customers 06/97 195/97 Namibia Energy Assessment (English) 03/93 11320-NAM Niger Energy Assessment (French) 05/84 4642-NIR Status Report (English and French) 02/86 051/86 Improved Stoves Project (English and French) 12/87 080/87 Household Energy Conservation and Substitution (English and French) 01/88 082/88 Nigeria Energy Assessment (English) 08/83 4440-UNI Energy Assessment (English) 07/93 11672-UNI Rwanda Energy Assessment (English) 06/82 3779-RW Status Report (English and French) 05/84 017/84 Improved Charcoal Cookstove Strategy (English and French) 08/86 059/86 Improved Charcoal Production Techniques (English and French) 02/87 065/87 Energy Assessment (English and French) 07/91 8017-RW Commercialization of Improved Charcoal Stoves and Carbonization Techniques Mid-Term Progress Report (English and French) 12/91 141/91 SADC SADC Regional Power Interconnection Study, Vols. I-IV (English) 12/93 -- SADCC SADCC Regional Sector: Regional Capacity-Building Progran for Energy Surveys and Policy Analysis (English) 11/91 Sao Tome and Principe Energy Assessment (English) 10/85 5803-STP Senegal Energy Assessment (English) 07/83 4182-SE Status Report (English and French) 10/84 025/84 Industrial Energy Conservation Study (English) 05/85 037/85 Preparatory Assistance for Donor Meeting (English and French) 04/86 056/86 Urban Household Energy Strategy (English) 02/89 096/89 Industrial Energy Conservation Program (English) 05/94 165/94 Seychelles Energy Assessment (English) 01/84 4693-SEY Electric Power System Efficiency Study (English) 08/84 021/84 Sierra Leone Energy Assessment (English) 10187 6597-SL Somalia Energy Assessment (English) 12/85 5796-SO South Africa Options for the Structure and Regulation of Natural Republic of Gas Industry (English) 05/95 172/95 Sudan Management Assistance to the Ministry of Energy and Mining 05/83 003/83 Energy Assessment (English) 07/83 451 I-SU Power System Efficiency Study (English) 06/84 018/84 Status Report (English) 11184 026/84 Wood Energy/Forestry Feasibility (English) 07187 073/87 Swaziland Energy Assessment (English) 02/87 6262-SW Tanzania Energy Assessment (English) 11/84 4969-TA Peri-Urban Woodfuels Feasibility Study (English) 08/88 086/88 Tobacco Curing Efficiency Study (English) 05/89 102/89 Remote Sensing and Mapping of Woodlands (English) 06/90 -- Industrial Energy Efficiency Technical Assistance (English) 08/90 122/90 Togo Energy Assessment (English) 06/85 5221-TO -4 - Region/Country Activity/Report Title Date Number Togo Wood Recovery in the Nangbeto Lake (English and French) 04/86 055/86 Power Efficiency Improvement (English and French) 12/87 078/87 Uganda Energy Assessment (English) 07/83 4453-UG Status Report (English) 08/84 020/84 Institutional Review of the Energy Sector (English) 01/85 029/85 Energy Efficiency in Tobacco Curing Industry (English) 02/86 049/86 Fuelwood/Forestry Feasibility Study (English) 03/86 053/86 Power System Efficiency Study (English) 12/88 092/88 Energy Efficiency Improvement in the Brick and Tile Industry (English) 02/89 097/89 Tobacco Curing Pilot Project (English) 03/89 UNDP Terminal Report Energy Assessment (English) 12/96 193/96 Zaire Energy Assessment (English) 05/86 5837-ZR Zambia Energy Assessment (English) 01/83 4110-ZA Status Report (English) 08/85 039/85 Energy Sector Institutional Review (English) 11/86 060/86 Power Subsector Efficiency Study (English) 02/89 093/88 Energy Strategy Study (English) 02/89 094/88 Urban Household Energy Strategy Study (English) 08/90 121/90 Zimbabwe Energy Assessment (English) 06/82 3765-ZIM Power System Efficiency Study (English) 06/83 005/83 Status Report (English) 08/84 019/84 Power Sector Management Assistance Project (English) 04/85 034/85 Power Sector Management Institution Building (English) 09/89 -- Petroleum Management Assistance (English) 12/89 109/89 Charcoal Utilization Prefeasibility Study (English) 06/90 119/90 Integrated Energy Strategy Evaluation (English) 01/92 8768-ZIM Energy Efficiency Technical Assistance Project: Strategic Framework for a National Energy Efficiency Improvement Program (English) 04/94 -- Capacity Building for the National Energy Efficiency Improvement Programme (NEEIP) (English) 12/94 -- EAST ASIA AND PACIFIC (EAP) Asia Regional Pacific Household and Rural Energy Seminar (English) 11/90 China County-Level Rural Energy Assessments (English) 05/89 101/89 Fuelwood Forestry Preinvestment Study (English) 12/89 105189 Strategic Options for Power Sector Reform in China (English) 07/93 156/93 Energy Efficiency and Pollution Control in Township and Village Enterprises (TVE) Industry (English) 11/94 168/94 Energy for Rural Development in China: An Assessment Based on a Joint Chinese/ESMAP Study in Six Counties (English) 06/96 183/96 Fiji Energy Assessment (English) 06/83 4462-FIJ Indonesia Energy Assessment (English) 11/81 3543-IND Status Report (English) 09/84 022/84 Power Generation Efficiency Study (English) 02/86 050/86 -5- Region/Country Activity/Report Title Date Number Indonesia Energy Efficiency in the Brick, Tile and Lime Industries (English) 04/87 067/87 Diesel Generating Plant Efficiency Study (English) 12/88 095/88 Urban Household Energy Strategy Study (English) 02/90 107/90 Biomass Gasifier Preinvestment Study Vols. I & II (English) 12/90 124/90 Prospects for Biomass Power Generation with Emphasis on Palm Oil, Sugar, Rubberwood and Plywood Residues (English) 11/94 167/94 Lao PDR Urban Electricity Demand Assessment Study (English) 03/93 154/93 Malaysia Sabah Power System Efficiency Study (English) 03/87 068/87 Gas Utilization Study (English) 09/91 9645-MA Myanmar Energy Assessment (English) 06/85 5416-BA Papua New Guinea Energy Assessment (English) 06/82 3882-PNG Status Report (English) 07/83 006/83 Energy Strategy Paper (English) Institutional Review in the Energy Sector (English) 10/84 023/84 Power Tariff Study (English) 10/84 024/84 Philippines Commercial Potential for Power Production from Agricultural Residues (English) 12/93 157/93 Energy Conservation Study (English) 08/94 -- Solomon Islands Energy Assessment (English) 06/83 4404-SOL Energy Assessment (English) 01/92 979-SOL South Pacific Petroleum Transport in the South Pacific (English) 05/86 -- Thailand Energy Assessment (English) 09/85 5793-TH Rural Energy Issues and Options (English) 09/85 044/85 Accelerated Dissemination of Improved Stoves and Charcoal Kilns (English) 09/87 079/87 Northeast Region Village Forestry and Woodfuels - Preinvestment Study (English) 02/88 083/88 Impact of Lower Oil Prices (English) 08/88 -- Coal Development and Utilization Study (English) 10/89 Tonga Energy Assessment (English) 06/85 5498-TON Vanuatu Energy Assessment (English) 06/85 5577-VA Vietnam Rural and Household Energy-issues and Options (English) 01/94 161/94 Power Sector Reform and Restructuring in Vietnam: Final Report to the Steering Committee (English and Vietnamese) 09/95 174/95 Household Energy Technical Assistance: Improved Coal Briquetting and Commercialized Dissemination of Higher Efficiency Biomass and Coal Stoves (English) 01/96 178/96 Western Samoa Energy Assessment (English) 06/85 5497-WSO SOUTH ASIA (SAS) Bangladesh Energy Assessment (English) 10/82 3873-BD Priority Investment Program (English) 05/83 002/83 Status Report (English) 04/84 015/84 Power System Efficiency Study (English) 02/85 031/85 Small Scale Uses of Gas Prefeasibility Study (English) 12/88 -- India Opportunities for Commercialization of Nonconventional Energy Systems (English) 11/88 091/88 -6 - Region/Country Activity/Report Title Date Number India Maharashtra Bagasse Energy Efficiency Project (English) 07/90 120/90 Mini-Hydro Development on Irrigation Dams and Canal Drops Vols. l, II and III (English) 07/91 139/91 WindFarmn Pre-lnvestment Study (English) 12192 150/92 Power Sector Reforrn Seminar (English) 04/94 166/94 Nepal Energy Assessment (English) 08/83 4474-NEP Status Report (English) 01/85 028/84 Energy Efficiency & Fuel Substitution in Industries (English) 06/93 158/93 Pakistan Household Energy Assessment (English) 05/88 -- Assessment of Photovoltaic Programs, Applications, and Markets (English) 10/89 103/89 National Household Energy Survey and Strategy Formulation Study: Project Terminal Report (English) 03/94 -- Managing the Energy Transition (English) 10/94 -- Lighting Efficiency Improvement Program Phase 1: Commercial Buildings Five Year Plan (English) 10/94 -- Sri Lanka Energy Assessment (English) 05/82 3792-CE Power System Loss Reduction Study (English) 07/83 007/83 Status Report (English) 01/84 010/84 Industrial Energy Conservation Study (English) 03/86 054/86 EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA (ECA) Bulgaria Natural Gas Policies and Issues (English) 10/96 188/96 Central and Eastern Europe Power Sector Reforrn in Selected Countries 07/97 196/97 Eastern Europe The Future of Natural Gas in Eastern Europe (English) 08/92 149/92 Poland Energy Sector Restructuring Program Vols. I-V (English) 01/93 153/93 Portugal Energy Assessment (English) 04/84 4824-PO Romania Natural Gas Development Strategy (English) 12/96 192/96 Turkey Energy Assessment (English) 03/83 3877-TU MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA (MNA) Arab Republic of Egypt Energy Assessment (English) 10/96 189/96 Morocco Energy Assessment (English and French) 03/84 4157-MOR Status Report (English and French) 01/86 048/86 Energy Sector Institutional Development Study (English and French) 05/95 173/95 Syria Energy Assessment (English) 05/86 5822-SYR Electric Power Efficiency Study (English) 09/88 089/88 Energy Efficiency Improvement in the Cement Sector (English) 04/89 099/89 Energy Efficiency Improvement in the Fertilizer Sector (English) 06/90 115/90 Tunisia Fuel Substitution (English and French) 03/90 -- Power Efficiency Study (English and French) 02/92 136/91 Energy Management Strategy in the Residential and Tertiary Sectors (English) 04/92 146/92 Renewable Energy Strategy Study, Volume I (French) 11/96 190A/96 Renewable Energy Strategy Study, Volume 11 (French) 11/96 190B1/96 -7 - Region/Country Activity/Report Title Date Number Yemen Energy Assessment (English) 12/84 4892-YAR Energy Investment Priorities (English) 02187 6376-YAR Household Energy Strategy Study Phase I (English) 03/91 126/91 LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN (LAC) LAC Regional Regional Seminar on Electric Power System Loss Reduction in the Caribbean (English) 07/89 -- Elimination of Lead in Gasoline in Latin America and the Caribbean (English and Spanish) 04/97 194/97 Bolivia Energy Assessment (English) 04/83 4213-BO National Energy Plan (English) 12/87 -- La Paz Private Power Technical Assistance (English) 11/90 111/90 Prefeasibility Evaluation Rural Electrification and Demand Assessment (English and Spanish) 04/91 129/91 National Energy Plan (Spanish) 08/91 131/91 Private Power Generation and Transmission (English) 01/92 137/91 Natural Gas Distribution: Economics and Regulation (English) 03/92 125/92 Natural Gas Sector Policies and Issues (English and Spanish) 12/93 164/93 Household Rural Energy Strategy (English and Spanish) 01/94 162/94 Preparation of Capitalization of the Hydrocarbon Sector 12/96 191/96 Brazil Energy Efficiency & Conservation: Strategic Partnership for Energy Efficiency in Brazil (English) 01/95 170/95 Hydro and Thermal Power Sector Study 09/97 197/97 Chile Energy Sector Review (English) 08/88 7129-CH Colombia Energy Strategy Paper (English) 12/86 -- Power Sector Restructuring (English) 11/94 169/94 Energy Efficiency Report for the Commercial and Public Sector (English) 06/96 184/96 Costa Rica Energy Assessment, (English and Spanish) 01/84 4655-CR Recommended Technical Assistance Projects (English) 11/84 027/84 Forest Residues Utilization Study (English and Spanish) 02/90 108/90 Dominican Republic Energy Assessment (English) 05/91 8234-DO Ecuador Energy Assessment (Spanish) 12/85 5865-EC Energy Strategy Phase I (Spanish) 07/88 -- Energy Strategy (English) 04/91 Private Minihydropower Development Study (English) 11/92 Energy Pricing Subsidies and Interfuel Substitution (English) 08/94 11798-EC Energy Pricing, Poverty and Social Mitigation (English) 08/94 12831-EC Guatemala Issues and Options in the Energy Sector (English) 09/93 12160-GU Haiti Energy Assessment (English and French) 06/82 3672-HA Status Report (English and French) 08/85 041/85 Household Energy Strategy (English and French) 12/91 143/91 Honduras Energy Assessment (English) 08/87 6476-HO Petroleum Supply Management (English) 03/91 128/91 Jamaica Energy Assessment (English) 04/85 5466-JM Petroleum Procurement, Refining, and Distribution Study (English) 11/86 061/86 -8- Region/Country Activity/Report Title Date Number Jamaica Energy Efficiency Building Code Phase I (English) 03/88 -- Energy Efficiency Standards and Labels Phase I (English) 03/88 -- Management Information System Phase I (English) 03/88 -- Charcoal Production Project (English) 09/88 090/88 FIDCO Sawmill Residues Utilization Study (English) 09/88 088/88 Energy Sector Strategy and Investment Planning Study (English) 07/92 135/92 Mexico Improved Charcoal Production Within Forest Management for the State of Veracruz (English and Spanish) 08/91 138/91 Energy Efficiency Management Technical Assistance to the Comision Nacional para el Ahorro de Energia (CONAE) (English) 04/96 180/96 Panama Power System Efficiency Study (English) 06/83 004/83 Paraguay Energy Assessment (English) 10/84 5145-PA Recommended Technical Assistance Projects (English) 09/85 -- Status Report (English and Spanish) 09/85 043/85 Peru Energy Assessment (English) 01/84 4677-PE Status Report (English) 08/85 040/85 Proposal for a Stove Dissemination Program in the Sierra (English and Spanish) 02/87 064/87 Energy Strategy (English and Spanish) 12/90 -- Study of Energy Taxation and Liberalization of the Hydrocarbons Sector (English and Spanish) 120/93 159/93 Saint Lucia Energy Assessment (English) 09/84 5111 -SLU St. Vincent and the Grenadines Energy Assessment (English) 09/84 5103-STV Trinidad and Tobago Energy Assessment (English) 12/85 5930-TR GLOBAL Energy End Use Efficiency: Research and Strategy (English) 11/89 Women and Energy--A Resource Guide The International Network: Policies and Experience (English) 04/90 -- Guidelines for Utility Customer Management and Metering (English and Spanish) 07/91 Assessment of Personal Computer Models for Energy Planning in Developing Countries (English) 10/91 Long-Term Gas Contracts Principles and Applications (English) 02/93 152/93 Comparative Behavior of Firms Under Public and Private Ownership (English) 05/93 155/93 Development of Regional Electric Power Networks (English) 10/94 -- Roundtable on Energy Efficiency (English) 02/95 171/95 Assessing Pollution Abatement Policies with a Case Study of Ankara (English) 11/95 177/95 A Synopsis of the Third Annual Roundtable on Independent Power Projects: Rhetoric and Reality (English) 08/96 187/96 08/27/97 ESMAP The World Bank 1818 H Street, N. W. Washington, D. C. 20433 U. S. A.. Joint United Nations Development Programme f World Bank E-SMLPES'AMAP Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme-