Page 1 PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) CONCEPT STAGE Report No.: AB5264 Project Name Benin: Urban Environment Project Region AFRICA Sector Solid waste management (60%); Pollution Management and Environmental Health (20%); Water-Sanitation and Sewerage (20%) Project ID P113145 Borrower(s) GOVERNMENT OF BENIN Implementing Agency Ministry of Environment and Protection of Nature Benin Environment Category [ ] A [X] B [ ] C [ ] FI [ ] TBD (to be determined) Date PID Prepared November 12, 2009 Estimated Date of Appraisal Authorization June 1, 2010 Estimated Date of Board Approval November 4, 2010 1. Key development issues and rationale for Bank involvement Benin is a small country with a population of 9 million people and a per capita income of US$ 570/annum (World Bank, 2009). The agricultural sector accounts for 35 % of the GDP and provides employment to about 65 % of the workforce. Annual GDP growth averaged 4.3 % from 1996 to 2006, and is currently about 5%. Poverty is high with 37.4 % of Beninese living below the poverty line. In terms of human development indicators, Benin ranks low and is placed 163 out of 177 countries according to the 2007 UNDP Human Development Report (UNDP, 2007). Compared to other African Countries of similar size and development, Benin is a heavily urbanized country with nearly 45 % of the population living in urban areas. Cotonou, the defacto capital of the country and the economic hub of Benin, hosts half of the urban population of the country. The rate of population growth is increasing rapidly in Cotonou and other major cities including Porto Novo and Parakou, with an annual urban population growth rate of 5%. 47% of the urban population of Benin resides in the three major cities of Cotonou, Porto Novo and Parakou. Benin’s economic potential to a large extent depends on Cotonou’s sector activities, trading centers, infrastructure such as port of Cotonou and Dantokpa market—the latter being a key trading hub of West and Central African countries and Benin. In addition to tourism and transport, coastal fishing remains an integral component Cotonou’s economy, providing livelihood to more than 15,000 people (Dossou & Glehouenou-Dossou, 2007). 2. Inadequate collection and disposal of solid waste is a critical environmental issue in urban areas in Benin (Brock & Foeken, 2006). About 480,589 tons of solid waste per year and 185,000 tons of organic material per year are produced in the urban areas. While Cotonou generates 154,000 tons per year of waste and is serviced by a landfill located at Ouesse, only 7.86% of this waste is collected and disposed properly (BOPEN, 2007). Through a Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA)- sponsored SWM support program (now sustained by the Municipality of Cotonou) various NGOs are involved in collection. Still, a substantial amount of solid waste and sewage from households and Dantokpa market ends up in informal dumpsites or is discharged into the banks of the Cotonou lagoon Page 2 and lake Nokoué, adversely impacting the lagoon ecosystem and economic activities (such as fishing) arising from it. While composting activities linked with urban agriculture are taking place in Cotonou, primarily through community based initiatives and support from the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), greater support is needed (Brock & Foeken, 2006). In the neighboring municipalities, most household waste collected by NGOs, ends up in informal dumpsites given that there is no system or capacity of transporting the waste. The landfill at Ouesse financed by CIDA and built in 2007 has 8 cells, one of which is already filled. As yet, there is no mechanism there for capturing landfill gas or for waste to energy conversion activities. Furthermore, there are no provisions for recycling in the greater Cotonou metropolitan area, even though reuse of some materials (e.g. metals from industries) does take place. A long term strategy that can help the municipalities cope with rapid urbanization and associated demands on service delivery, especially for SWM services, is thus urgently needed. 3. Limited access to latrines and to waste treatment facilities is also an important contributor to poor water quality. For instance, according to the Demographic and Health Survey in Benin (EDSB III), about 66.4% of the urban population has access to latrines. In secondary cities, access to latrines (on-site septic tanks, improved and traditional latrines), is even lower. At present, there is no sewerage system in operation in Benin. Cotonou is the only city that has a septic sludge disposal plant (at station SIBEAU in Ekpe) but its capacity is greatly exceeded. Most of the domestic wastewater is discharged into the open in streets and in gutters. The greater Cotonou metropolitan area including Porto Novo is home to more than 80% of industries of Benin. In the absence of adequate waste treatment facilities, industrial wastewater is also discharged into the open or into the lagoons and the sea. Liquid waste that these industries generate (cooling water facilities and wastewater production) was evaluated in 1992 to have more than 400,000 m 3 or approximately 1,200 tons of BOD and COD of 10,250 tons per annum (CEDA, 1999). The industrial effluents are discharged into the lagoon and/or sea or infiltrate into the groundwater without treatment. Groundwater resources are threatened by poorly maintained septic tanks, runoff from solid waste dumps, and industrial wastewater. 4. Poor air quality in major urban areas in Benin is also a growing urban environmental concern and has negative effects on human health (World Bank, 2002; Boko, 2003, World Bank, 2007). Estimates show that the costs of air pollution in Cotonou constitute about 1.2% of GDP (World Bank, 2002). A range of factors contribute to poor air quality in Cotonou including an increase in the number of aging imported vehicles, increase in the number of two wheeled taxis called zemidjan , and petrol quality used in vehicles, particularly adulterated fuel that finds its way through informal channels from neighboring Nigeria, especially from the Niger delta region. Some of the main pollutants include CO2, NOx, PM, HC, SO2, O3 and CO (Schwela, 2007). In Cotonou, according to a study conducted for the Ministry of Environment and Protection of Nature (MEPN) within the framework of the Clean Air Initiative in Sub- Saharan African Cities, the pollution level is primarily due to vehicular traffic (including two-wheeled vehicles), either from direct emissions from their combustion engines or suspended particles from travel on dirt roads (MEPN, 2007). Industrial emissions in greater Cotonou are increasingly also a problem. However, the existing legislation has a number of gaps; it refers only to mobile sources and does not include pollution through industrial sources, uncontrolled fires, waste deposits and transboundary air pollution (Schwela, 2007). Furthermore, pollution caused by benzene (largely attributable to two stroke engine motorcycles), a carcinogen, is not included in the legislation. 5. The high levels of certain pollutants are associated with a range of health problems including cancer and respiratory illnesses, with air pollution (especially from benzene) from two-stroke engine motorcycles causing 164 cases of cancer each year (MEPN, 2007). Additional health risks including cancer, respiratory and pulmonary diseases are posed by lead and the PM10 particulates. Despite these risks, there is no regular air quality monitoring system in the greater Cotonou metropolitan area. Page 3 6. One of the main climate risks facing Cotonou and neighboring coastal regions is sea level rise. As a recent study highlights, in Sub Saharan Africa, coastal regions in Benin, along with Nigeria and Mozambique are amongst the most vulnerable to storm surge and sea level rise (Dasgupta et. al. 2009). Benin is also subject to climate variability, particularly decreasing rainfall, especially in the south, with precipitation decreasing by 9% in the past 20 years in Cotonou (Dossou & Glehouenou-Dossou, 2007). 7. The Bank has been actively involved in environmental management initiatives in Benin starting with the 1992 NEAP and continuing with the Environmental Management Project (1996-2001) that helped build national capacity for environmental management, policy making and implementation. Since 1993, the Bank has been supporting the GoB to address its urban development issues, through a series of projects. The first Bank project on urban issues (1993 – 1997) focused on (a) infrastructure rehabilitation and environmental sanitation in Cotonou and Porto-Novo; and (b) promotion of the development of local small and medium-sized private enterprises through the involvement of NGOs and residents. This project was followed by the first Decentralized City Management Project (PGUDI, 2000 – 2004) in Cotonou, Porto-Novo and Parakou and the second decentralized city management project (PGUDII, 2006 – 2010) which was extended to cover other secondary cities. With respect to solid waste management, PGUD II focuses mainly on the city of Porto Novo, with the objective of improving the solid waste management and supporting the city to establish a solid waste management system that will increase the percentage of waste collected and transported to a new landfill to at least 65% of waste generated in the city. 8. These urban projects laid the foundation for municipal capacity building in the planning, implementation and monitoring of municipal services and improvements in urban infrastructure such as support to drainage, roads, construction of landfills in key cities. For example, in the Bank-funded PGUD-II project, an important emphasis was placed on SWM in Porto Novo and a sub-component— Solid Waste Management in Porto Novo—dedicated to the effort. The component aimed at: (i) helping the city of Porto Novo to develop a long term vision for integrated solid waste management; and (ii) assisting the city to implement a priority action plan, including the financing of studies, training, technical support and, subject to meeting some pre-defined triggers (including satisfactory completion and adoption of a comprehensive solid waste management plan including citing studies and environmental and social impact assessment), the construction of a landfill. Thus far, the Municipality of Porto Novo has succeeded in creating an operational SWM Unit that is handling the pressing issues of managing the process of getting the landfill and secondary transfer stations construction underway and overseeing the organization and management of primary and secondary solid waste collection in the city of Porto Novo. The planned completion of the construction of the landfill is December 2010. It is pertinent to note that, issues such as improved collection and disposal of solid waste in Cotonou and neighboring municipalities, wastewater treatment, and adaptation to climate change in urban planning have so far not yet been addressed by Bank lending nor by other donor intervention. The proposed project will build on the Bank’s and donor lending in the area of environmental and urban sector lending, extend support to environmental issues by directly tackling these major issues affecting the greater Cotonou metropolitan area and will thus be a logical continuation of these activities. 9. The focus of the proposed project is consistent with the government’s PRSP and the Bank’s CAS. The Government wants to emphasize water supply and sanitation during the PRSP period (2006 – 2011) The CAS document also noted that while previous support for urban services focused on much needed infrastructure and capacity building, the support during the current CAS period (2009 – 2012) would be re-oriented towards improving urban environmental management including solid waste management, controlling urban transport pollution, increasing access to urban sanitation, and drainage services, and strengthening the institutional capacities to manage the environment. It is part of these challenges that the proposed project seeks to address. Page 4 2. Proposed objective(s) 10. The main objective of the project is to improve environmental quality and strengthen institutional capacity for addressing urban environmental issues in the coastal city of Cotonou and neighboring municipalities of Seme-Kpodji, Porto Novo, Abomey-Calavi, and Ouidah. The proposed development indicators will include: (i) Improved collection rate of solid waste in the greater Cotonou metropolitan area (ii) Improved monitoring and reporting of key air quality indicators in the greater Cotonou metropolitan area; (iii) PDO 3 : Increase in number of staff with training in disaster and climate risk at national and municipal levels. 3. Preliminary description 11. The proposed project proposes to finance the following: &RPSRQHQW\03fi\1d\036XSSRUW\03WR\03LPSURYHPHQW\03LQ\03HQYLURQPHQWDO\03VDQLWDWLRQ\03DQG\03VROLG\03ZDVWH\03PDQDJHPHQW\11\03 \0b\07fflfi\03P\0c\03 \03 This complements wor k being carried out by CIDA in Cotonou, the Bank’s intervention in SWM in Porto Novo, and comprises the following: Component 1a: Improvements in pre-collection, collection, and transfer of solid waste services. This will include (i) construction of 15-20 collection points and two transfer stations in the greater Cotonou metropolitan area; and (ii) support and capacity building of local NGOs involved in the pre-collection of household wastes in Cotonou, Seme-Kpodji, Ouidah, Porto Novo and Abomey-Calavi municipalities. Component 1b: Support to composting, recycling and waste water management . Building on CIDAs work in urban agriculture and composting, this component will (i) expand the capacity of the existing composting facility and promote marketing of compost. Financing through the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) mechanism will also be leveraged; (ii) support setting up a pilot recycling plant in Cotonou and (iii) improve capacity of existing sludge treatment facility in Ekpe in partnership with the private sector (SIBEAU) and municipalities Component 1c: Technical Assistance and Capacity Building. This component will finance: (i) the review and adjustment of the institutional, regulatory and financing framework for solid waste management in Greater Cotonou; (ii) elaboration of the solid waste management master plan of Abomey-Calavi and Seme Kpodji; (iii) the development of waste water master plan for the greater Cotonou metropolitan area; (iv) review of the institutional and regulatory framework for waste water at the national level; and (v) review of existing mechanisms for handling and treating industrial effluents. Component 1d: Public Education. This component will finance public education and information campaigns on the benefits of waste minimization, safe waste disposal, separation at source among other activities. &RPSRQHQW\03ffl\1d\037HFKQLFDO\03DVVLVWDQFH\03DQG\03&DSDFLW\\03VWUHQJWKHQLQJ\03LQ\03$LU\034XDOLW\\030DQDJHPHQW\03\0b\07ff\03P\0c\03 This addresses some of the recommendations and action plan of the Bank funded 2007 urban air quality study. \03 Component 2a: Strengthening regulatory framework for air quality management: This component will finance at the national level, the review of the regulatory framework, including clarification of national standards for air quality management in Benin. Page 5 Component 2b: Air quality monitoring, data analysis and reporting system: This component will fund establishment of fixed stations/laboratories in Cotonou for air quality measurement and monitoring (implementation of an air quality monitoring system is a key action mentioned in Bank supported Air quality study in Cotonou (MEPN, 2007). Strengthened air quality monitoring arrangements combined with improved analysis and reporting will help develop targeted activities for reducing air pollution. Component 2c: Training, Communication and Sensitization: This sub-component will support training, communication, and sensitization campaigns on utilization of fuels and adoption of the standard fuel norms. This will be done in collaboration with CNSR. Further, it will also finance staff training and upgrade the CNSR existing equipment to better monitor vehicle certification and control. Component 3: Strengthening Institutional Capacity for Addressing Climate Change and Disaster Risk Management ($2 m) Component 3 : This component will support preparation of a long term national strategy for climate change in Benin. It will support institutional strengthening of the municipalities, national and sectoral ministries with respect to climate change and disaster risk management. It will also support preparation of an urban climate change and disaster risk management strategy for Benin. Component 4: Project Management ($3 m) This component is designed to provide effective and efficient management support for the implementation (including monitoring and evaluation) of the project 4. Safeguard policies that might apply 12. The project will be categorized as a B as potential environmental and social impacts are expected to be less adverse and thus easily remediable. Two safeguards policies are triggered: Environmental Assessment and Involuntary Resettlement. 13. The collection and transportation of wastes, and emissions from collection points and transfer stations can pollute the air and emit annoying noises; coupled with the fact that civil works associated with the construction of additional collection points and transfer stations has the propensity to generate potential site specific environmental and social impacts. 14. To this end, an Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) will have to be prepared by the borrower. Although land acquisition or restriction of access to sources of livelihood is not planned, as due diligence a Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) will also have to be prepared by the borrower. The ESMF and RPF will be disclosed in- country and the Bank’s Info shop prior to appraisal. 5. Tentative financing Source: ($m.) BORROWER/RECIPIENT International Development Association (IDA) 30 Total 30 Page 6 6. Contact point Contact: Africa Eshogba Olojoba Title: Sr Environmental Spec. Tel: 5331+3425 Fax: Email: aolojoba@worldbank.org Location: Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire (IBRD)