employment status;global migrant stock;unemployment rate;access to health care;access to social security;social security health insurance;bilateral social security agreement ...  See More + access to migrant workers;right to social protection;large number of women;legal framework for migration;health care benefit;country of residence;social security institutions;social security system;survivor's pension;social security rights;portability of benefits;flow of migrants;international migrant worker;Complementary Health Insurance;home countries;home country;Social Protection Benefits;European Economic Area;number of workers;country of birth;host country nationals;evolution over time;family reunification policies;social security coverage;information and communication;international good practice;health insurance contributions;Objectives and Outcomes;private sector regime;social protection program;health insurance plan;social security contribution;payment of contributions;average monthly pension;health care coverage;equality of treatment;compulsory health insurance;social security pension;proportion of woman;social security administration;representatives from ministries;international labor mobility;social security revenues;high unemployment rate;collection of information;world war i;labor market characteristic;labor market decision;capacity of individual;scope of coverage;social security benefit;double taxation treaty;bilateral labor agreements;number of beneficiaries;portability of pension;migration corridor;contribution period;minimum pension;population size;pension scheme;acquired right;retirement age;multilateral agreement;cash benefit;bilateral agreement;foreign population;retired migrant;pension issue;contribution rate;family benefit;unemployment benefit;old-age pension;benefit portability;military personnel;individual pension;information provision;Exchange Rates;tax revenue;legal migrant;information exchange;minimum age;non-governmental organization;occupational disease;pension system;family allowance;population composition;social contribution;lump sum;civil law;real cost;Work Injury;work year;single person;unemployed person;research focus;health status;information gap;migration stocks;price index;working day;administrative arrangement;disability benefit;Learning and Innovation Credit;sickness benefit;defined benefit;administrative support;collected data;social insurance;ambulatory care;retirement pension;public pension;return migrant;multilateral level;european commission;international agreement;political purpose;labor migrants;informal sector;economic integration;working age;pension insurance;north-north migrants;Death Insurance;population statistic;contribution payable;historical event;family leave;foreign resident;world population;methodological approach;qualitative assessment;global population;increasing share;massive migration;policy shift;research methodology;internal review;qualitative research;information sources;financial claim;economic migration;labor supply;portability arrangement;fiscal advantage;employee contributions;contributory benefits;average pension;legal aspect;benefit disadvantage;legal residence;Public Goods;retirement benefit;applicable legislation;undocumented immigrant;multilateral arrangement;eligibility criterion;benefit calculation;contracting party;social policies;application process;preferential treatment;tax scheme;professional training;Labor migration;compulsory contribution;minimum contribution;early retirement;social policy;average wage;conceptual issue;administrative provision;bureaucratic efficiency;social right;annual salary;working life;health expenditure;insurance scheme;low-income individual;earmarked tax;replacement income;present study;tax obligation;health benefit;benefit taxation;  See Less -