Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road SFG1993 V13 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP) FOR MAJE CULVERT Ibadan Urban Flood Management Project AUGUST 2016 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP) FOR MAJE CULVERT Submitted to: Project Implementation Unit Ibadan Urban Flood Management Project (IUFMP) Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria By: Bodley Company Limited 21, Oshin Road, New Bodija, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria Tel No.: 08033068212, 08026357816 E-mail: bodleycom@yahoo.com AUGUST 2016 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road TABLE OF CONTENT TABLE OF CONTENT ......................................................................................................................... i LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES AND PLATES .................................................................................................... iv LIST OF ABBREVIATION AND ACRONYMS ................................................................................ v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. vi CHAPTER 1 ......................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Justification of the Proposed Project........................................................................................ 1 1.3 Objectives of the ESMP ........................................................................................................... 2 1.4.1 Study Approach ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.4.2 Field Studies ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.4.2.1 Environmental Data Acquisition.............................................................................................. 3 1.4.2.2 Socio-economics Data Acquisition .......................................................................................... 4 1.4.2.3 Community and Stakeholder Consultations ............................................................................. 5 1.4.2.4 Risk / Hazard Assessment ........................................................................................................ 6 1.4.3 Quality Control ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.4.4 Method for Assessment of Impacts.......................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER 2 ......................................................................................................................................... 8 POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ......................................................... 8 2.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 8 2.2 State Policies ............................................................................................................................ 8 2.2.1 Oyo State Policy on Environment (2013) ................................................................................ 8 2.3 National Policies ...................................................................................................................... 8 2.3.1 National Policy on the Environment (1988) ............................................................................ 8 2.4 Regulatory Framework ............................................................................................................ 9 2.4.1 Federal Legislation................................................................................................................... 9 2.4.2 Other Acts and Legislations ................................................................................................... 10 2.4.2.1 Land Use: Land Use Act (1978) ............................................................................................ 10 2.5 Assessment of the Policy and Regulatory Framework .......................................................... 11 2.5.1 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Act ....................................................................... 11 2.5.2. Federal Environmental Protection Agency (FEPA) Sectoral Guideline ................................ 11 2.5.3 National Policy on Environment ............................................................................................ 11 2.6 International Environmental Agreements .............................................................................. 11 2.7 Institutional Framework ......................................................................................................... 11 2.7.1 Oyo State Ministry of Environment and Water Resources .................................................... 12 2.7.2 Federal Ministry of Environment (FMEnv) ........................................................................... 12 2.8 World Bank Safeguard Policies ............................................................................................. 12 2.9 Nigeria EIA Guidelines and World Bank EA Guidelines ...................................................... 13 2.10 Adequacy of Legal Instruments for Environmental & Social Issues ..................................... 15 CHAPTER 3 ....................................................................................................................................... 16 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................. 16 3.1 River Culvert Study Area....................................................................................................... 16 3.2 Description of the Proposed Intervention Works ................................................................... 18 3.3 Project Activities.................................................................................................................... 20 CHAPTER 4 ....................................................................................................................................... 21 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ENVIRONMENT .................................................................... 21 4.1 Physical Environment ............................................................................................................ 21 4.1.1 Climate /Meteorology ............................................................................................................ 21 4.1.2 Geology/Hydrogeology.......................................................................................................... 22 4.1.3 Hydrology .............................................................................................................................. 22 4.1.4 Surface Water Quality............................................................................................................ 23 4.1.5 Soil Quality ............................................................................................................................ 24 i Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road 4.1.6 Air Quality and Noise Level .................................................................................................. 25 4.2 Biological Environment ......................................................................................................... 25 4.2.1 Vegetation .............................................................................................................................. 25 4.2.2 Microbiology.......................................................................................................................... 29 4.2.3 Wild Life ................................................................................................................................ 29 4.3 Waste Management ................................................................................................................ 29 4.3.1 Waste Management Practice .................................................................................................. 29 4.4 Socio-economics .................................................................................................................... 30 4.4.1 Social Organisation ................................................................................................................ 30 4.4.2 Infrastructural Facilities ......................................................................................................... 30 4.4.3 Demography........................................................................................................................... 30 4.3.4 Economic activities ................................................................................................................ 31 4.3.5 Solid waste generation ........................................................................................................... 31 4.4.6 Characteristics of Building (House) and Neighbourhood ...................................................... 34 4.4.7 Flood impacts ......................................................................................................................... 36 4.4.8 Anticipated Positive and Negative Impact of the Proposed project ....................................... 37 4.4.9 Effect of the Maje Culvert Rehabilitation Project ................................................................. 37 4.4.10 Existing Organisations and Local Customs/Festivals in the Community .............................. 39 4.4.11 Gender relations ..................................................................................................................... 40 4.4.12 Mitigating Measures .............................................................................................................. 40 CHAPTER 5 ....................................................................................................................................... 41 POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS ........................................................ 41 CHAPTER 6 ....................................................................................................................................... 43 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................................................ 43 6.1 Mitigation Measures .............................................................................................................. 43 6.2 Monitoring Plan ..................................................................................................................... 43 6.3 Institutional Arrangement ...................................................................................................... 55 6.4 Training and Capacity Building/Strengthening Plan ............................................................. 57 6.5 Implementation Schedule....................................................................................................... 59 6.6 Proposed Budget for ESMP Implementation ......................................................................... 59 6.7 Reporting ............................................................................................................................... 60 6.8 ESMP Disclosures ................................................................................................................. 61 CHAPTER 7 ....................................................................................................................................... 62 PUBLIC / STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTATIONS .......................................................................... 62 7.1 Stakeholders’ Meeting ........................................................................................................... 62 7.2 Community Risk Assessment ................................................................................................ 65 CHAPTER 8 ....................................................................................................................................... 67 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................... 67 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................... 68 ANNEX A: BID SPECIFICATIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS ................................................................................. 69 ANNEX B: QUESTIONNAIRE ......................................................................................................... 75 ANNEX C: MINUTES OF STAKEHOLDER’S MEETING ............................................................ 81 ANNEX D: ATTENDANCE AND PHOTOS AT STAKEHOLDER’S MEETING ......................... 84 ANNEX E: ATTENDANCE AND PHOTOS AT COMMUNITY RISK ASSESSMENT ............... 86 ANNEX F: SCHEDULE OF FEEDBACK TO STAKEHOLDER COMMUNITIES ON SOCIOECONOMIC/HAZARDS SURVEY ................................................................... 88 ANNEX G: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL CHECKLIST ...................................................... 89 ANNEX H: TERMS OF REFERENCE ............................................................................................. 91 ii Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1: Sampling methods for environmental parameters ............................................................... 4 Table 1.2: Phases of the participatory risk assessment* ....................................................................... 7 Table 2.1: Existing National Environmental Protection Regulations ................................................... 9 Table 2.2: List of Proposed Environmental National Legislations ..................................................... 10 Table 2.3: Summary of Safeguards Policies triggered ........................................................................ 13 Table 2.4: Nigeria EIA Guidelines and World Bank EA Guidelines.................................................. 14 Table 3.1: Hydraulic Structure Size and Design Details..................................................................... 19 Table 3.2: Geometric and Pavement Data for Approach Roads ......................................................... 19 Table 3.3: Scope of Works for Road and Hydraulic Structures .......................................................... 19 Table 3.4: Proposed Built and Work Areas for Project Sites .............................................................. 19 Table 3.1: Proposed Activities ............................................................................................................ 20 Table 4.1: Physicochemical Characteristics of Surface water ............................................................ 24 Table 4.2: Physcio chemical characteristics of soils ........................................................................... 24 Table 4.3: Air Quality and Noise Measurements in the Study Area ................................................... 25 Table 4.4: Flora Species list of the Maje/Idi mangoro site ................................................................ 26 Table 4.5: Water Microbiology........................................................................................................... 29 Table 4.6: Soil Microbiology .............................................................................................................. 29 Table 4.7: Fauna species list of the around the study area site. ......................................................... 29 Table 4.8: Distribution of the population in the 11 LGAs of Ibadan .................................................. 30 Table 4.9: The population growth of Ibadan (1856-2010) .................................................................. 31 Table 4.10: Economic activities in Ibadan .......................................................................................... 31 Table 4.11: Dumpsite Areas in Ibadan................................................................................................ 31 Table 4.12: Socio-economic Characteristics of Respondents ............................................................. 32 Table 4.13: Characteristics of Building (House) and Neibourhood .................................................... 34 Table 4.14: Flood Impacts .................................................................................................................. 36 Table 4.15: Anticipated Positive and Negative Impact of the Proposed project ................................. 37 Table 4.16: Effect of the Maje Culvert Rehabilitation Project ........................................................... 38 Table 4.17: Specific Effect of Maje Culvert Rehabilitation Project ................................................... 38 Table 4.18: Coping Strategies during Periods of Flood ...................................................................... 39 Table 5.1: Significant Potential Environmental Impacts .................................................................... 41 Table 5.2: Significant Potential Social Impacts .................................................................................. 42 Table 6.1: Environmental and Social Mitigation and Monitoring Plan .............................................. 44 Table 6.2: Institutional Safeguards Responsibilities ........................................................................... 55 Table 6.3: Proposed Training Programme for the Implementation of the ESMP ............................... 58 Table 6.5: Estimated Budget for the Implementation of ESMP ......................................................... 60 Table 6.6: Types of reports ................................................................................................................. 60 Table 6.7: Disclosure procedure ......................................................................................................... 61 Table 7.1: Summary of Proceedings of Consultations ........................................................................ 63 Table 7.2: Hazards in the community ................................................................................................. 65 Table 7.3: Risk Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 65 iii Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road LIST OF FIGURES AND PLATES List of Figures Figure 3.1: Maje Culvert Location...................................................................................................... 16 Figure 5.1 Annual Rainfall for Ibadan (1925-2014) ........................................................................... 21 Figure 5.2: Average Daily Temperature oC ........................................................................................ 21 Figure 5.3: Average Daily Relative Humidity (%) ............................................................................. 21 Figure 5.4: Average Daily Solar Radiation (gm-cal/cm2) ................................................................... 21 Figure 5.5: Average Daily Wind Speed (mph) ................................................................................... 22 Figure 5.6: Computed Potential Evapotrsnapiration (Et) and IITA Evaporation (Ep) ....................... 22 Figure 5.7: Runoff Hydrograph for the river ...................................................................................... 23 List if Plates Plate 3.1: Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road (Ogunpa River) Schematic Layout ............. 17 Plate 4.1(a-e): Vegetation around Maje/Idi mangoro culvert Photograph showing the in the study site ......................................................................................................................................... 28 Plate I: Attendance Sheet Stakeholders Meeting ................................................................................ 84 Plate II: Maje Stakeholder Meeting Pictures ...................................................................................... 85 Plate III: Community Risk Assessment Attendance Sheet ................................................................. 86 Plate III: Community Risk Assessment Pictures ................................................................................ 87 Plate III: Community Risk Assessment Attendance Sheet ................................................................. 87 iv Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road LIST OF ABBREVIATION AND ACRONYMS ARAPs Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plans AU African Union BOD Biochemical Oxygen Demand CBOs Community Based Organizations CDA Community Development Associations DO Dissolved Oxygen EA Environmental Assessment ECOWAS Economic Community of West African States EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMS Environmental Management Systems ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan Fe Iron FEPA Federal Environmental Protection Agency FGDs Focus Group Discussions FMEnv Federal Ministry of Environment GPS Global Positioning System H2S Hydrogen Sulphide HSE Health, Safety and Environment IITA International Institute of Tropical Agriculture IUFMP Ibadan Urban Flood Management Project K Potassium LGA Local Government Areas Mg Magnesium Mn Manganese N Nitrogen Na Sodium NESREA National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency NGOs Non-Governmental Organisations Ni Nickel NO2 Oxides of Nitrogen NOSDRA National Oil Spill Detection and Response Agency Pb Lead PDO Project Development Objective pH Hydrogen Ion Concentration PIU Project Implementation Unit PPE Personal Protective Equipment QA/QC Quality Assurance / Quality Control RAM Risk Assessment Matrix RAPs Resettlement Action Plans RPF Resettlement Policy Framework RPF Resettlement Policy Framework SHM Spoil Handling Management SOx Oxides of Sulphur SPM Suspended Particulate Matter TDS Total Dissolved Solids TSS Total Suspended Solids WHO World Health Organization WMP Waste Management Plan Zn Zinc v Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES1 Background The Oyo State Government is being supported by the World Bank to implement the Ibadan Urban Flood Management Project (IUFMP) that aims at developing a long-term flood risk management framework. Specifically, the Bank’s support is financing some priority i nvestments related to improving the infrastructure of Ibadan City, especially those destroyed by August 26, 2011 floods. The Bank's support will help Ibadan reduce flood risks, improve waste collection and treatment, while developing and improving the quality of existing infrastructural assets. Through the ESMF developed for the IUFMP priority sites, this study has been categorized as an Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP). The environmental management Consultant, Bodley Company Limited has been contracted by the IUFMP-PIU to carry out this ESMP study. ES2 Policy Legal and Administrative Framework The framework for the EA of the IUFMP involves the following; Oyo State Ministry of Environment and Water Resources, Federal Ministry of Environment (FMEnv) in conjunction with the implementing MDAs. These institutions and agencies are responsible for regulating and monitoring environmental issues, information and waste management standards applicable to the IUFMP. The Nigeria’s EIA requirements and the World Bank safeguard policies were harmonized as far as possible. This is made responsive with regard to the following: early consideration of environmental and social issues (starting at the screening stage); identification and early consultation with stakeholders; prevention of negative environmental and social impacts through the consideration of feasible alternatives; and incorporation of mitigation measures into planning and (engineering) design. ES 3 Project Description The culvert is located at Maje River – Maje - Idi Mango Road in Oluyole Local Government Area. The culvert is damaged and water flow through drains is hampered by water weeds. Culvert is inadequate and needs to be replaced. Drainage also requires reconstruction. The proposed civil works Includes: replacement of the existing arrangement of small pipes with a larger capacity and wider double cell 3x2 box culvert and construction of formal roadway approaches and associated drainage. ES 4 Project Option The following project options were considered and compared: no project option, delayed project option, construct at new location and construct now at proposed location. The “construct now at proposed location� is the recommended option; the advantages of this option include: no new land take and access roads are required, flooding and flood associated risks to physical and human environments are prevented or mitigated, the stakeholder communities shall be cooperative and happy and the government is perceived favourably by the people. There is no known disadvantage compared with the other options. ES5 Description of the Environment Ibadan city sits on a rolling topography with the basement rock types characterized by low porosity and permeability. The city sprawls on either side of Aremo and Mapo ridges. The city has tropical rainy climate with an average annual rainfall of 1265.6mm. From the estimated runoffs of the river, only one flow peak occurred in 1980 (August), and two peaks in 1990, 1999 and 2011 which occurred in July and October. The water bodies were slightly alkaline and had pH values varying from 8.61 - 8.76, the values fell within the tolerable limits for surface waters of pH 6 –9 stipulated by FMENV. The range of values of concentrations of the various air quality parameters measured showed that the levels of suspended particulate matter (36.0 – 78.0 μg/m3), nitrogen dioxide (<0.01ppm), sulphur dioxide (<0.01ppm), hydrogen sulphide (<0.01ppm) and carbon monoxide (<0.01ppm), were within the Federal Ministry of Environment (FMENV) permissible limits. The ambient noise levels in the study area ranged between 60.8 – 69.7dB (A). These levels are within the FMEnv permissible exposure limits of 90dB (A) per day. vi Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road The project site is naturally rainforest vegetation presently rated as low sensitivity area where development can proceed with little ecological impact due to urban expansion and activities. The site is composed basically of wetland/marshy tree species, high shrubs and grasses which are mostly prominent by the river banks downstream but sparse upstream Eight fauna species including: Mammalia, Aves, and Arthropoda were documented from the project site. The most prominent fauna and their Relative Importance value (RIV) are Insi formicidae (3.8%), Zenaida sp (1.5%) and Rattus rattus (1.3%). There were no endangered fauna species encountered in the project site. Majority of the people not satisfied with the condition of public health institutions in the community and considered potable water and public electricity to be very poor; the source of water for domestic use is mainly from wells and boreholes. There is a fair level of literacy among the populace. The communication facilities are relatively fair but public recreation facilities are very poor. The roads within the community are generally poor. Motorcycle popularly known as ‘okada’ is the most frequently patronised mode of transportation in the area. Occupationally, they are mostly traders and artisans, others include professionals, civil servants and pensioners; there is a sizable percentage of unemployed especially among the youth. The organizations in the community include landlords association for community development. The existing gender relations in the community are cordial and non-discriminatory; women participate actively alongside men in community development activities. There is also cordial relationship between the Christians, Muslims and people of other religious faiths. The practice of indiscriminate dumping of wastes on side drains, streams, and canals by the populace has contributed to the frequent occurrence of flooding in the area. ES 6 Potential Environmental and Social Impacts Significant Potential Environmental Impacts Project Positive Negative Phase Pre-  Ambient Air deterioration from release of dusts and gaseous emissions Construction  Noise and Vibration from the use of machineries and motorized equipment  Vegetation loss from land clearing and preparation activities  Fauna Habitat alteration and displacement due to site clearing  Exposure of soil to erosion and loss of quality from devegetation  Generation of vegetal wastes, other cleared materials and construction wastes  Surface water contamination as a result of sediment run off from exposed soils Construction  Propagation of vegetal cover  Ambient Air deterioration from release of dusts and gaseous emissions  Restoration of flora habitat  Noise and Vibration from the use of machineries and motorized equipment  Ecological balance and  Soil erosion from exposure of soil to rain and wind conservation  Slope instability arising from excavation in active areas  Soil stabilization and regeneration  Predisposition of soil to erosion resulting from improper abandonment of borrow pit  Water pollution due to sedimentation and siltation from runoff from spoils  Soil contamination and loss of soil quality  Generation of spoils and other construction wastes  Underground water pollution from spillages & leakages from oil storage tanks.  Increased surface water run-off due to diversion during construction. Operation/  Reduced vulnerability to flooding  Reoccurrence of flooding as a result of uncontrolled solid waste disposal in the Maintenance hazards stream or side drains causing blockage  Lesser vulnerability of people and property,  Improved disaster preparedness for adverse events;  Increased resilience of communities at risk of flooding, and the preservation of assets of households and businesses against flood risk  Improved solid waste management vii Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Significant Potential Social Impacts Project Positive Negative Phase Pre-  Employment of local labour for site  Traffic congestion and increased risk of road traffic accidents and Construction clearing injuries  Risk of occupational accidents, injuries and .diseases Construction  Employment of local labour for  Damage to existing underground public utility cables and pipes and construction and vegetation activities disruption of services  Traffic congestion and increased risk of road traffic accidents and injuries  Health and safety risks associated with falls and drowning in improperly abandoned borrow pits  Risk of occupational accidents, injuries and diseases  HIV/AIDS and other STDs arising from the interactions amongst the workforce and the host community  Injuries from accidental discharge of construction materials during transportation to site  Social stress and disruptions due to lack of local labour Operation/  Reduced mortality and morbidity from  Occupational accidents and injuries Maintenance water related diseases  Risk of falls from unprotected culverts  Diversification of livelihood and increased productivity.  Reduction in public spending on replacement and rehabilitation of infrastructure  Creation of employment ES 7 Environmental and Social Management Plan Cost effective measures to prevent / reduce the negative impacts or enhance the positive impacts of the activities of the proposed construction project and a monitoring plan for the activities are proffered. The detailed proposed mitigation measures and related monitoring activities are provided in the Environmental and Social Mitigation and Monitoring Plan in Table 6.1. The successful implementation of this ESMP depends on the commitment and capacity of various institutions and stakeholders to implement the ESMP effectively. The roles and responsibilities of the various institutions in the implementation of this ESMP are outlined in Table 6.2, while the types of trainings proposed to be organized during the project period and the estimated cost is given in Table 6.3. The implementation schedule and the proposed budget for the ESMP implementation are given in Tables 6.4 and 6.5 respectively. The total cost for implementing the ESMP is estimated at Forty-four Thousand Eight Hundred and Eighty Dollars only (US$ 44,880.00) which is Seventeen Million, Nine Hundred and Fifty-two Thousand Naira only (N 17,952,000.00). ES8 Public Consultation The public consultation indicated that the socio-economic livelihoods of the communities are negatively affected by flooding. The following are some of the conclusions and issues raised: o There was harmony of purpose by the community members at the forum, and everyone who contributed to the discussion spoke as for the entire community. o Due to years of unfulfilled promises of construction of affected culvert/bridge, there was trust problem across communities. Hence there is need to build trust across project sites. o There was harmony of purpose by the community members at the forum, and everyone who contributed to the discussion spoke as for the entire community. o Communities had utilized self-galvanized efforts in reducing adverse impacts of the sites on their livelihoods through periodic contributions. o Corruption was identified as responsible of previously poorly constructed culvert/bridges which were not durable. Hence, stakeholders do not want quality of the projects compromised. viii Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road o Communities demand right to grievance and petitions. o There is demand for provision of formal garbage and sewage disposal sites to stop dumping of waste in rivers. o Communities demand for alternative routes during construction of the new bridge/road infrastructure. It is expected that the issues raised by stakeholders will be taken into consideration during the implementation of this project. It is expected that the results of the socio-economic impact assessment be communicated to the community through a process of debriefing on results of the study. This will allow the communities to make final input before full project implementation. ES9 Conclusions and Recommendations The following conclusions and recommendations are presented.  The contractor and PIU shall coordinate with the Oyo State Federal Road Safety Commission and Oyo State Traffic Management Agency all through pre-construction and construction works on site to ensure that safety is maintained and potential traffic impact managed;  Design and construct a temporary alternative access bridge and approach road for community members for pedestrian and light traffic usage;  Install proper lightening and relevant road signage and barriers for safety precautions;  Community members shall be sensitized and duly informed on the time and duration of civil works through consultations;  Community members shall be carried along during project implementation and shall be mobilized to provide community security for equipment and personnel working on site;  Community members shall be given preference for casual labour and semi-skilled labour as much as practicable in order to minimize social problems at the community level;  The stream banks shall be cleared of vegetation and the width widened appropriately along the project area of influence;  The silt, vegetation and solid wastes obstructing the stream shall be cleared and evacuated;  Pre-construction and construction works shall be carried out in an environmentally sustainable and socially responsible and inclusive manner;  The topography of the approach roads to the bridge as well as side drains shall be taken into consideration during the construction for proper discharge downstream and for the avoidance of sheet erosion;  Adequate mitigation measures have been proffered for the few negative environmental and social impacts that may occur due to the activities associated with the proposed works, while enhancement measures are proffered for the potential positive impacts;  Appropriate institutional framework has been drawn up to implement the mitigation measures and the proposed monitoring programmes;  Therefore the proposed intervention work is doable in an environmentally sustainable and socially responsible and inclusive manner, and it is most desirable because of the obvious environmental, health and socio-economic benefits ix Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background The Oyo State Government is being supported by the World Bank to implement the Ibadan Urban Flood Management Project (IUFMP) that aims at developing a long-term flood risk management framework. Specifically, the Bank’s support is financing some priority i nvestments related to improving the infrastructure of Ibadan City, especially those destroyed by August 26, 2011 floods. The Bank's support will help Ibadan reduce flood risks, improve waste collection and treatment, while developing and improving the quality of existing infrastructural assets. The project is designed to keep a good balance between urgent post disaster needs (dredging, reconstruction of bridges, roads, etc.) and medium-to-long term needs (institutional support, upgrading existing and building new infrastructure to upgrade services and mitigate future risks). Overall, the Project Development Objective (PDO) is to “improve the capacity of Oyo State to manage flood risk and to respond effectively and promptly to flooding in the city of Ibadan�. A preliminary assessment by the World Bank and State Government team identified multiple and interconnected reasons which contribute to the growing challenge of flooding in Ibadan. As a response to the Government’s request, the World Bank constituted a team of experts to work with the city stakeholders to assess the causes of flooding and the associated impacts. A preliminary flood risk assessment was carried out based upon field visits and discussions with local officials and community leader and supported by an initial broad scale hydrological and hydraulic analysis. The assessment identified a complex combination of different factors: (i) prolonged and torrential rainfall, (ii) a landscape typified by small rounded hills and relatively flat bottomed valleys, (iii) a highly interconnected drainage network, and (iv) a dense urban development, which inevitably creates significant flood risk in the city. The IUFMP activities involve medium-sized civil works such as construction of infrastructure and/or stabilization or rehabilitation in and around the Ibadan city. These could result in environmental and social impacts thus triggering the World Bank’s Safeguard Policies including Environmental Assessment OP 4.01; Involuntary Resettlement OP4.12; Natural Habitats OP 4.04; Physical Cultural Resources OP 4.11, and Safety of Dams OP 4.37 and Public Disclosure OP 17.60. The environmental and social safeguards concerns are being addressed through the national instrument already prepared under the project: an Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF). Through the ESMF developed for the IUFMP priority sites, the study for this priority site has been categorized as an Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP). The environmental management Consultant, Bodley Company Limited has been contracted by the IUFMP-PIU to carry out this ESMP study. 1.2 Justification of the Proposed Project The initial investigations by the World Bank and State Government team highlighted the following main drivers of flood risk within the city. The main drivers of flood risk in Ibadan include the following:  Rapid and uncontrolled runoff from the built environment; in particular the large expanses of impermeable tin roofs, characteristic of Ibadan, and the hard packed soils, contribute to a rapid runoff response.  Deforestation and loss of vegetation in the upper parts of the catchment; these result in greater run-off rates and volumes. 1 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road  Poorly controlled development in the natural floodplain; this places property and life in danger, and reducing the effectiveness of the floodplain as a natural flood storage area and conveyance.  Inadequate and poorly maintained road ways and watercourse crossings; numerous small watercourses intersecting the city are typically crossed by low bridges or culverts. These bridges/culverts are prone to scour leading to collapse while poorly surfaced road ways soon become impassable during the floods.  The lack of effective debris management within the City; this means that high levels of debris (man-made and natural) are readily recruited by flood flows leading to blockages of the culverts and bridges, thereby causing significant local flooding and severely reducing the capacity of the channel to convey flood flows.  Inadequate surface drainage throughout the City; thus forcing the majority of rainfall to be carried as overland flow while the formation of deep rills and gullies on the steeper slopes exacerbates the rapid run-off and contributing to severe soil erosion.  Lack or limited awareness of the community of the risks associated with flooding and how to respond.  Lack of formal emergency response capability, both at government level with limited civil contingency planning and at a local level, and along with limited community resilience means that response to flood events is difficult to coordinate and actions taken are not as effective in reducing impacts as they could be.  Lack of flood forecasting and warning capability; a lack of technical infrastructure and clarity of ministerial responsibility and organizational structure means little warning is given regarding the onset of flooding and how best to minimize impacts. Therefore, the project is deemed necessary in order to overcome the flood risks of the City contributed to by the above factors. 1.3 Objectives of the ESMP The overall objective of this exercise is to assist Oyo State to undertake the necessary studies and prepare Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) of the proposed project, in compliance with the World Bank environmental, social safeguards policies and procedures as well as the Oyo State Ministry of Environment and Water Resources and the Federal Ministry of Environment guidelines and procedures. The specific objectives of the ESMP are to:  Describe the proposed project by providing a synthetic description of the project relevant components;  Identify the policy, legal and administrative framework relevant to the project.  Define and justify the project study area for the assessment of environmental and social impacts;  Describe and analyse the physical, biological and human environment conditions in the study area before project implementation;  Present and analyse alternatives to the proposed project, including the “without project� option, by identifying and comparing the alternatives on the basis of technical, economic, environmental and social criteria;  Identify potential positive and negative environmental and social impacts that may arise from the implementation and operation of the project;  Define appropriate mitigation/enhancement measures to prevent, minimise, mitigate, or compensate for adverse impacts or to enhance the project environmental and social benefits, including responsibilities and associated costs;  As appropriate, prepare an environmental hazard plan including an analysis of the risk of accident, the identification of appropriate security measures and the development of a preliminary contingency plan;  Identify institutional responsibilities and needs for capacity building if necessary to implement the recommendations of the environmental and social assessment; 2 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road  Carry out consultations with primary and secondary stakeholders in order to obtain their views on and preoccupations about the project;  Determine the project’s social impacts on health and social well -being ; quality of the living environment; economic material well-being ; family and community; and gender relations  Identify and communicate any key uncertainties and risks associated with the accuracy of the findings of the social assessment, as well as of the proposed project.  Assess the impact of the construction on individuals and groups whose livelihoods are tied to the route/road (motor cycle taxi and tricycle operators etc.). As part of consultations, the ESMP shall identify the potential negative impact on the livelihoods of these individuals and groups and propose appropriate mitigation measures  Propose management actions that need to be implemented in order to mitigate the negative environmental and social impacts and enhance the positive impacts of the project;  Propose environmental and social management plan (ESMP) that will ensure that mitigation measures are implemented and effective during the project activities and adequate and timely corrective actions are taken where required;  Propose institutional arrangements, incorporating roles and responsibilities of stakeholders involved in management actions and monitoring;  Describe capacity building and training requirements for effective implementation of the ESMP;  Outline the implementation schedule and reporting procedures for the ESMP;  Ensure the allocation of sufficient resources for effective implementation. 1.4 Approach and Methodology of the ESMP 1.4.1 Study Approach The study was carried out in conformity with the requirements of the World Bank and other Development Finance Institutions criteria for Project Financing and the Approval of the Federal Ministry of Environment and Oyo State Ministry of Environment and Water Resources. The study was also carried out in conformity with the Terms of Reference. The Consultant reported to the Project Coordinator of the Project Implementation Unit (PIU) of IUFMP at the takeoff of the studies, in order to be familiarized with the project. Technical assistance was sought from the Safeguards Specialists of the PIU and they were carried along in the Stakeholders consultative forum and the Field Study. The documents that were reviewed included the following.  Environmental and Social Management Framework of Ibadan Urban Flood Management, January 2014  Project Implementation Manual for IUFMP, February, 2015  Environmental and Social Screening of 14 Priority Sites under IUFMP, Final Report, February 2015  Detailed Engineering Design, Preparation of Tender Documents and Construction Supervision for Twelve (10+2) Priority Sites in Ibadan, Draft Final Report, December 2016  Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF);  World Bank Safeguards Policies;  Federal and State Environmental Laws, Regulations, Policies and Guidelines. 1.4.2 Field Studies The environmental and socioeconomics field studies were carried out to complement the literature review information on the baseline conditions. The studies involved collection of biophysical and biological samples for laboratory analysis, in-situ measurements, community stakeholder meetings, questionnaire administration, focus group discussions and oral interviews. 1.4.2.1 Environmental Data Acquisition 3 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road GPS Garmin model 75s were used to geo-referenced and mapped the sampling points in the study area. The ecological features, geographical location of communities within the project area were taken into considerations in the selection of sampling points. Table 1.1 indicates the sampling / in-situ methods used for the environmental parameters. Table 1.1: Sampling methods for environmental parameters Environmental Sampling Methodology Medium Climate & The meteorological data such as temperature, relative humidity, sunshine hour, radiation, Meteorological and rainfall was obtained from the Synoptic Meteorological Station at IITA. The data were Studies analyzed whilst the prevailing climatic conditions were assessed in-situ. Air Quality Studies The list of equipment used for the ambient air quality monitoring within and around the site are shown in table below EQUIPMENT USED PARAMETERS ANALYSED Altair 5x multigas detector SO2, NO2, CO, H2S and O2 Sper Scientific Humidity/Temperature Relative Humidity And Temperature Meter Aerotrak Particulates Monitor, 9303 SPM (suspended particulate matter) Sound Level Meter, Extech 407730 Noise level Noise Measurement The precision Sound Level Meter Extech 407730 was used to measure the Noise levels. Measurements were done by holding the sensors monitoring equipment at a height of about two meters in the direction of the prevailing wind and readings were recorded when a steady rate has been established. Soil Studies Soil Samples were collected within grid cells in the study area. This pattern is adopted in soil sampling to ensure that the entire area is covered for easy characterization of soil. Surface (0-15cm) for top (T) and sub-surface (15-30cm) for bottom (B) samples was collected. Sub-samples of soil for microbial analyses were taken in sterilized 100ml McCartney plastic bottles (properly labeled) and stored in a cool box. A total of six soil samples were collected. Surface Water Water samples were collected from surface water across the project area using the Niskin Sampler. Clean sampling bottles and sterile 100ml plastic containers were used to collect surface water samples at the designated geo-referenced locations. Amber bottles of 250ml capacity were used to collect water samples for heavy metals analysis. These samples were acidified to pH of 2 in the field using concentrated nitric acid. Fast changing physico- chemical parameters such as pH, Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), Dissolved Oxygen (DO) and Temperature were measured in the field using the Combo H198129 tester. These samples were preserved by storing in ice-filled cooler boxes before transportation to the laboratory. A total of three (3) surface water samples – upstream, midstream and downstream were collected for laboratory analyses of various parameters. Flora & Fauna A visual inspection was done to gain an overall impression of the habitats and communities present in the area under study. Eight transects of 50m each were taken randomly along the vegetation covering the project site. The plant species on either side of each transect were enumerated using floristic and structural attributes such as major growth forms. A pair of binocular was used where necessary and photographs taken. Unidentified plants were collected with their floral description and information, pressed and dried for the herbarium. They were subsequently identified in the Herbarium. All species were identified to species level and the number of each species recorded. The Relative Importance Value (RIV) for each species will be calculated. Active searches for reptiles and amphibians were also conducted within habitats likely to harbour or be important for such species, such as rocky outcrops and wetlands. 1.4.2.2 Socio-economics Data Acquisition Government or private programmes, policies and projects can cause potentially significant changes in many features of the socio-economic environment. Accordingly, environmental and social impacts studies must systematically identify, quantify, where possible, and appropriately interpret the significance of these anticipated changes. Factors that describe the socio-economic environment represent a composite of numerous interrelated and non-related items. On one hand, this category 4 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road represents a catchall group, since it includes factors not associated with the physico-chemical or biological environment. On the other hand, this category is the most descriptive of human relationships and interactions. Scope and objectives This study is part of a larger study involving the environmental and social impact assessment of the Maje Culvert under the IUFMP Priority Sites. The study was embarked upon to provide baseline data on the socio-economic status of the inhabitants around the project site, elicit information on the impacts of past flood events, anticipated positive and negative impacts of the project, and the coping strategies with the failed bridge impacts. The specific objectives of the study are to: 1. Find out the existing demographic and socio-economic characteristics of the inhabitants of the communities bordering the project site. 2. Examine the impacts of the past flood and bridge collapse on the residents 3. Investigate the people’s perception of the likely impact of the project on their socio -economic well being. 4. To provide the basis for monitoring whatever positive/negative impacts the project might have on the inhabitants’ well being. Description of the Social setting This description involves: socio-economic and cultural environment, including present and projected, where appropriate. Review the description of the social setting as provided by IUFMP. Other gaps were filled during the site visit using structured questionnaire, indepth interview, FGDs and onsite assessment. Some of the variables used in the description of the social setting include the following.  Demographic structure of the community;  Leadership patterns and political process;  Family structure;  Services available in or near the community: schools, health facilities, credit facilities, religious organizations, government agencies;  Debt/Credit relationships;  Existing organizations (e.g. age grades, religious groups) and capacity for community action;  Conflicts and divisions (ethnic, religious ,etc.) within the community or between communities;  Important local customs and festivals;  Educational Levels;  Permanence of the community;  Primary forms of livelihood;  Community attitudes towards erosion and drainage;  Relevant aspects of gender relations; women’s vs. men’s roles. In addition to the existing information on the socio-economic setting, structure questionnaire was designed in such a way as to allow a reconstruction of the cultural model, which characterizes the communities in the study area. Some of the information elicited from the questionnaire include the socio-economic characteristics of the respondents, the characteristics of the house and neighbourhood they live, flood impacts on the community, impacts of the failed culvert, and coping strategies with the impacts. In addition to the structures questionnaire, Focus Group Discussions were held in the community and key indepth interviews with some stakeholders. 1.4.2.3 Community and Stakeholder Consultations Public forum meeting was held on the 8th of July, 2016 including direct discussions with key stakeholders in the community and the PIU to determine their current views. The outcomes of these were documented and these include how issues and problems raised would be resolved. It should be 5 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road pointed out that the stakeholders’ forum provided the takeoff for the participatory risk assessment which was subsequently conducted two weeks later after due consultation. 1.4.2.4 Risk / Hazard Assessment In order to effectively address the issue of environmental and social impacts and to effectively engage the communities, participatory risk assessment method was used. This is a method used to engage communities developmentally using highly participatory approaches. This method emphasizes a bottom-up approach that aims to empower communities by involving them in defining problems, deciding solutions, implementing activities and evaluating results of interventions. The different role players relevant to a risk reduction projects include the residents, local leaders, CBOs, local government and NGOs as well as other representatives of stakeholder groups. Therefore, the first step is to establish enabling local stakeholders and institutional arrangements. On the spot assessments will be used to describe and analyze the physical and human environment conditions in the project locations. The basic issues in this assessment involve the proper contextualization of hazard, risk and vulnerability which are defined here as follows: Hazard – Things or processes that may have dangerous or harmful effects on people and the environment. These will be assessed by doing transect walk across the communities in the project sites and asking the people themselves to identify the various hazards they are faced with. Vulnerability – Internal conditions that increase people’s exposure and susceptibility to hazards or other shocks and stresses. These include both physical and social conditions of the people. The physical conditions of vulnerability include the conditions of the buildings (mostly residential), the quality of the neighbourhood (drainage, waste management, access roads and aesthetics). The social vulnerability would be assessed using the income, education and occupation (livelihood) of the people. Risk – The chance of harmful effects occurring due to the interaction between a hazard and vulnerability. An important first step in managing risks is to understand them, why they happen and who is most affected. Six important questions that would be asked with respect to risk include: 1. Who is most at risk? 2. Why are they at risk? 3. When are they most at risk? 4. What is increasing (or reducing) the risk? 5. What is the outcome of the risk? 6. How do at-risk groups reduce and cope with the risk? In view of the above, the participatory risk assessment was structured in three phases as presented in Table 1.2. 6 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Table 1.2: Phases of the participatory risk assessment* Phase 1 Preparatory groundwork Scope the risk context and the feasibility for risk reduction initiatives. Establish enabling local stakeholder and institutional arrangements Do background research on the settlement’s risk and development profile Make clear administrative and logistics arrangements with key stakeholders. Phase 2 Carry out participatory Ensure risk assessment process is participatory, inclusive risk assessment and robust Do thorough on-site field assessment Phase 3 Generate integrated Make risk reduction planning participatory, inclusive, with disaster risk reduction achievable, ‘do-able’ activities plans Integrate local actions with supportive municipal development processes Increase local responsibility for risk reduction Establish monitoring and evaluation processes 1.4.3 Quality Control Sample collection, handling and preservation were carried out in accordance with the World Bank Guidelines and the National and State Environmental guidelines and standards. Equipment were set, calibrated and operated following strictly manufacturers’ instructions. Both random and non-random samplings were considered for the field sampling. All data were entered into a log-book as soon as measurement or readings were taken. Results of the field sampling program, including information recorded on field datasheets were reviewed by the team leader for potential errors/omissions and to identify anomalous results. Original raw data files, including field notes, were retained; and duplicate files used for data analysis. 1.4.4 Method for Assessment of Impacts All significant environmental and social impacts, both positive and negative, which may occur as a result of the development, were identified. The criteria for predicting / assessing the impacts adopted were adopted from the International Organisation for Standardisation-Environmental Management System (IS0 14000). This approach was chosen considering its interactive and descriptive analysis of the relationship between the proposed project activities and the ecosystem components. In order to reduce elements of subjectivity inherent in the ranking process, our team of multi-disciplinary experts were co-opted to independently rank / quantify the potential impacts based on the five criteria: Legal/Regulatory Requirements (L), Risk (R), Environmental Impact Frequency (F), Environmental Impact (l) and Public Perception (P). The impacts are classified as significant if: (L+R+F+I+P) ≥ 15 or (F + I) ≥ 6 or P = 5. The impacts of the project activities were also characterized and described based on the following: short term or long term; beneficial or adverse; direct or indirect; reversible or irreversible; cumulative or incremental 7 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road CHAPTER 2 POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK 2.1 Introduction This chapter presents an overview of applicable state, federal and international policies and regulations that guide the implementation of the ESIA. 2.2 State Policies 2.2.1 Oyo State Policy on Environment (2013) Oyo State Policy on environment is a broad course of action that the Oyo State Government adopts so that it meets its objectives. The following are the environmental policies in Oyo State.  Be responsible for formulation, enforcing and coordinating policies, statutory rules and regulation on Solid Waste collection and disposal, general environmental protection, flood control and regulation of the ecological system and all activities related therein, throughout the state;  To advise the Government on state environmental policies and properties and on scientific and technological activities affecting the environment;  Conduct public enlightenment campaigns and disseminate vital information on environmental and ecological matters, and to mobilize the inhabitants of all area for effective observance of environmental rules and guidelines, for purpose of healthy and safe environment;  Render advisory services and support to all Local Government in the State in areas of Flood Control, Solid Waste Management, Ecological and Sanitation Matters;  Preparation of annual State of the Environment report for the State and transmit same to the Secretariat of the National Council on Environment;  Monitor sources of toxic pollutants in air, land and water and offering of necessary advice to industrial establishments;  Initiate measure to ensure pollution-free air, land, water throughout the State including any other steps to obviate, mitigate or eliminates environmental discomfort to individuals or groups or danger to lives and properties;  Ensure that the lawns and the surroundings of the departmental offices in Secretariat precincts are kept tidy and well trimmed;  Study, investigate, advice and recommend any all matters pertaining to beautification and citizens’ participation relating of same to the Government;  Obtain research findings from the relevant Federal and State Agencies for the purpose of policy formulation and dissemination of same on environmental sanitation and beautification to the public in the State; and  Carry out both administrative supervision and establishment duties with a view to ensuring well-managed finances and administration of the Ministry in line with Government policies. 2.3 National Policies Nigeria National Policy on environment is a broad course of action that the Government of Nigeria adopts so that it meets its objectives. 2.3.1 National Policy on the Environment (1988) The National Policy on the Environment aims to achieve sustainable development in Nigeria, and in particular to:  secure a quality of environment adequate for good health and well being;  conserve and use the environment and natural resources for the benefit of present and future generations;  restore, maintain and enhance the ecosystems and ecological processes essential for the functioning of the biosphere to preserve biological diversity and the principle of optimum 8 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road sustainable yield in the use of living natural resources and ecosystems;  raise public awareness and promote understanding of the essential linkages between the environment, resources and development, and encourage individuals and communities participation in environmental improvement efforts; and  co-operate with other countries, international organizations and agencies to achieve optimal use of trans-boundary natural resources and effective prevention or abatement of trans-boundary environmental degradation. 2.4 Regulatory Framework The regulatory framework is a system of regulations and the means used to enforce them. They are established by the Government of Nigeria to regulate environmental specific activities and are recognized by the law. The following gives an overview if the existing Federal legislations. 2.4.1 Federal Legislation Federal Environmental Protection Agency Decree No 58 (1988) The Federal Environmental Protection Agency (FEPA) was established by Decree No. 58 of 1988 and charged with the responsibility for environmental protection. Following the upgrading of the agency to a Federal Ministry of Environment (FMEnv) in January 2007, the Ministry was mandated to coordinate environmental protection and natural resources conservation for sustainable development. The FMEnv has developed statutory documents to aid in the monitoring, control and abatement of industrial waste. These guidelines stipulate standards for industrial effluent, gaseous emissions and hazardous wastes. Table 2.1 summarizes the existing national legal instruments applicable to environmental protection. Table 1.1: Existing National Environmental Protection Regulations S/N Regulations Year Provisions 1 National Environmental Protection 1991 The regulation makes it mandatory for industrial facilities to (Effluent Limitation) Regulations install anti-pollution equipment, makes provision for effluent treatment and prescribes a maximum limit of effluent parameters allowed. 2 National Environmental Protection 1991 Imposes restrictions on the release of toxic substances and (Pollution and Abatement in stipulates requirements for monitoring of pollution. It also Industries in Facilities Producing makes it mandatory for existing industries and facilities to Waste) Regulations conduct periodic environmental audits. 3 National Environmental Protection 1991 Regulates the collections, treatment and disposal of solid and (Management of Solid and hazardous wastes from municipal and industrial sources. Hazardous Wastes) Regulations. 4 Harmful Wastes (Special Criminal 1988 Provides the legal framework for the effective control of the Provisions etc) Decree No. 42 disposal of toxic and hazardous waste into any environment within the confines of Nigeria 5 Environmental Impact Assessment 1992 The decree makes it mandatory for an EIA to be carried out Act (Decree No. 86). prior to any industrial project development 6 National Guideline and Standard for 1991 The regulations provide guidelines for management of Environmental Pollution Control pollution control measures. 7 Workmen Compensation Act 1987 Occupational health and safety 8 Urban and Regional Planning Decree 1992 Planned development of urban areas (to include and manage No 88 waste sites) 9 Environmental Sanitation edicts, General environmental health and sanitation. Enforcing laws and enforcement agencies necessary laws 10 State waste management laws Ensure proper disposal and clearing of wastes 11 Public Health Law Covering public health matters 12 National Guidelines on 1999 Recognizes the value of EMS to EIA and sets out objectives Environmental Management Systems and guideline on general scope and content of an EMS (EMS) 9 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road S/N Regulations Year Provisions 13 National Policy on the Environment 1989 The policy identifies key sectors requiring integration of environmental concerns and sustainability with development and presents their specific guidelines 14 National Guidelines and Standards 1999 It deals with the quality of water to be discharged into the for Water Quality environment, sets standards and discharge measures for a wide range of parameters in water discharged from various industries. It also sets out the minimum/maximum limits for parameters in drinking water 15. National Air Quality Standard 1991 The World Health Organization (WHO) air quality standards Decree No. 59 were adopted by the then Federal Ministry of Environment (FMEnv) in 1991 as the national standards. These standards define the levels of air pollutants that should not be exceeded in order to protect public health. 16. National Environmental Standards 2007 Established to ensure compliance with environmental and Regulations Enforcement standards, guidelines and regulations. Agency (NESREA Act) 17. National Policy on Flood and 2006 This policy addresses the need to combat erosion in the Erosion Control (FMEnv) country utilizing the procedures outlined in the National Action Plan for Flood and Erosion Control and Technical Guidelines, developed by the WIC Environmental Committee which was set up to plan an operational platform for these issues 18. National Oil Spill Detection and 2005 This statutory regulation makes adequate regulations on waste Response Agency (NOSDRA Act) emanating from oil production and exploration and its potential consequences to the environment. Table 2.2: List of Proposed Environmental National Legislations S/N Regulation Year 1 Waste Prevention and Recycling Bill 1999 2 Response, Compensation and Liability For Environmental Damage Bill 1999 3 Waste Prevention and Recycling Bill 2000 4 Federal Environmental Protection Agency (Amendment) Bill 2001 5 Pollution Abatement and Waste Generation Facilities (control) Bill 2001 6 Federal Environmental Protection Agency Bill 2003 7 Industrial Wastewater Pollution and Control Bill 2003 8 Environmental Managers Registration Council of Nigeria Bill 2003 9 Amendment of EIA Decree No. 86 of 1992 Bill 2005 2.4.2 Other Acts and Legislations Other formal written enactment produced by a legislature or by a legislative process important in the project includes: 2.4.2.1 Land Use: Land Use Act (1978) This act provides a legal basis for land acquisition in Nigeria. The major provisions include:  Section 1: all land comprised in the territory of each state in the Federation is vested in the Governor of the state and such land shall be held in trust and administered for the use and common benefit of all.  Section 2 (a): all land in urban areas shall be under the control and management of the Governor of each State; and  Section 2 (b): all other land shall be under the control and management of the local government within the area of jurisdiction in which the land is situated. State governments have the right to grant statutory rights of occupancy to any person for any purpose; and the Local Government has the right to grant customary rights of occupancy to any person or 10 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road organization for agricultural, residential and other purposes. Further details on the Land Use Act (1978) are discussed in the RPF. 2.5 Assessment of the Policy and Regulatory Framework The existing legal framework for environmental assessment in Nigeria is considered adequate. Detailed laws, regulations and guidelines have been developed and serve as the framework for environmental protection. The implementation has been poor due to poor enforcement. 2.5.1 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Act The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Act does not encourage the participation of people whose lives are likely to be affected by a project; rather, it encourages the collection and documentation of technical information which is confusing to most people. 2.5.2. Federal Environmental Protection Agency (FEPA) Sectoral Guideline FEPA’s Guideline covering infrastructural projects deals with both the procedural and technical aspects of EIA for construction projects. The guideline stresses the need to carry out an EIA at the earliest stage possible. Infrastructure Project EIAs have been conducted in rather loose form, and often taken as a supplementary requirement to overall economic and engineering issues. 2.5.3 National Policy on Environment The policy and its institutional arrangements have not yielded the desired results. This is principally due to weak enforcement; inadequate manpower in the area of integrated environment management; insufficient political will; inadequate and mismanaged funding; low degree of public awareness of environmental issues; and a top–down approach to the planning and implementation of environmental programme. 2.6 International Environmental Agreements Nigeria is also a signatory to the following relevant international conventions:  Basel Convention on the control of hazardous wastes and their disposal;  Bonn Convention on conservation of Migratory Species;  Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants;  The African Convention on the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, The African Convention, 1968;  The Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, The World Heritage Convention, 1972;  The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, CITES, 1973;  The Framework Convention on Climate Change, Kyoto Protocol, 1995;  The Convention on Biological Diversity, 1992; and  The Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Waste, MARPOL, 1972; In addition, Nigeria also has obligations to protect the environment through various commitments to the African Union (AU), the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and the Commonwealth. It is also committed through relations with the European Community under the Lome IV Convention. 2.7 Institutional Framework The framework for the EA of the IUFMP involves the following in conjunction with the implementing MDAs. The following institutions and agencies are responsible for regulating and monitoring environmental issues, information and waste management standards applicable to the IUFMP. 11 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road 2.7.1 Oyo State Ministry of Environment and Water Resources Some of the mandate of the Oyo State Ministry of Environment and Water Resources is as follows:  Ensure the implementation of the provisions of the National Environmental Sanitation Policy and Guidelines at all levels of Government;  Enforce compliance with the provisions of these regulations;  Issue permits as prescribed in the relevant section of these regulations;  Ensure compliance with conditions of the permits as contained in the relevant schedules;  Establish strategic alliance with other Federal MDAs other states, local government areas and other relevant stakeholders;  Ensure that the waste management facilities comply with the Environmental Impact Statement;  Embark on intensive environmental education and awareness campaign on sound environmental sanitation and waste management; and  Develop and publicize set standards, for environmental sanitation, waste management and equipment procurement and maintenance. 2.7.2 Federal Ministry of Environment (FMEnv) The FMEnv in accordance with its mandatory functions will ensure that the project implementation conforms to the Environmental Impact Assessment Act 1992. FMEnv has responsibility to administrate and enforce environmental laws in Nigeria. The specific responsibilities of the ministry include:  Monitoring and enforcing environmental protection measures;  Enforcing international laws, conventions, protocols and treaties on the environment  Prescribing standards for and making regulations on air quality, water quality, pollution and effluent limitations, atmosphere and ozone protection, control of toxic and hazardous substances; and  Promoting cooperation with similar bodies in other countries and international agencies connected with environmental protection. 2.8 World Bank Safeguard Policies The World Bank has 10 + 2 Safeguard Policies to reduce or eliminate the negative environmental and social impacts of potential projects, and improve decision making. Details of the safeguard policies can be seen in Annex 2. These World Bank safeguard operational policies are:  OP/BP 4.01: Environmental Assessment  OP/BP 4.04: Natural Habitats  OP 4.09: Pest Management  OP/BP 4.12: Involuntary Resettlement  OP 4.10: Indigenous Peoples  OP 4.11: Physical Cultural Resources  OP 4.36: Forests  OP/BP 4.37: Safety of Dams  OP/BP 7.50: Projects on International Waters  OP/BP 7.60: Projects in Disputed Areas Plus 2  OP/BP 4.00: Use of Country System  OP/BP 17.50: Public Disclosure 12 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Table 2.3: Summary of Safeguards Policies triggered Operational Policy Yes Reasons No Environmental X Safeguards policy OP 4.01 is triggered in this study with the civil work Assessment(OP.4.01); activities for the immediate restoration of bridges / culverts. Therefore an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) which will be prepared and cleared by the Bank. In addition, the cleared ESIA will be publicly disclosed countrywide in Nigeria and at the World Bank Info Shop. Natural Habitat (OP/BP X This policy is triggered because some project activities may take place near 4.04) to critical natural habitats or environmentally sensitive areas and some mitigation measures may be necessary to minimize any negative environmental and social impacts. The project is not being implemented in any area with critical natural habitats, nor does it involve the significant conversion or degradation of natural habitats. Forests (OP 4.36) The project will not finance the development of forests. The area in which X this project would be implemented will not have impacts on the health and quality of forests or the rights and welfare of people and their level of dependence upon or interaction with forests. Physical Cultural Resources X Some activities in the project shall include civil works that could expose (OP 4.11) chance finds. These chance find sites may include sacred shrines and burial sites.. To mitigate this risk, specific procedures (such as chance find procedures) will be included in the ESIAs as required. Involuntary Resettlement X This policy is trigged because most of the sub-projects could involve (OP/BP 4.12) minimal or moderate land acquisition and or restriction of access to usual means of livelihood as most of the sub-projects will largely be rehabilitation of existing infrastructure. However, some of the projects may involve significant land acquisition and displacement of affected people. As part of the safeguards due diligence, the client will prepare a Resettlement Policy Framework RPF which will be reviewed and cleared by the Bank. Also, site specific Resettlement Action Plans (RAPs) or Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plans (ARAPs) will address the needs of persons who will be affected by loss of economic activities, land acquisition and/or relocation. The preparation of these safeguards documents will be inclusive and participatory, promoting community ownership and social accountability. The RPF and/or RAPs will be reviewed and cleared by both the project safeguards team and the Regional Safeguards Advisor. The RPF will have to be sent to the bank for review and clearance before it is disclosed publicly in country and on the Bank’s info shop prior to project appraisal. Projects in Disputed Areas The area in which this project would be implemented is not a conflict or X (OP/BP 7.60) disputed area. Disclosure Policy (OP/BP X All projects must disclose key information in country and through the 17.50) Bank’s Info shop 2.9 Nigeria EIA Guidelines and World Bank EA Guidelines The Environmental Impact Assessment Act No. 86 of 1992 requires that development projects be screened for their potential environmental and social impact. Based on the screening, a full, partial, or no EIA may be required. Guidelines issued in 1995 direct the screening process. According to these guidelines the Nigeria EIA Categories include: (See Table 2.4 below). 13 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Table 2.4: Nigeria EIA Guidelines and World Bank EA Guidelines FMEnv Category I II III Projects will require a full Projects may require Projects are considered Environmental Impact Assessment only a partial EIA, to have “essentially (EIA) for projects under this category which will focus on beneficial impacts� on EIA is mandatory according to Decree mitigation and the environment, for No. 86. Projects includes large-scale Environmental which the Federal activities such as agriculture (500 planning measures, Ministry of the hectares or more), airport (2500m or unless the project is Environment will longer airstrip), land reclamation (50 located near an prepare an hectares or more), fisheries (land based environmentally Environmental Impact aquaculture of 50 hectares or more), sensitive area--in which Statement. forestry (50 hectares or more case a full EIA is conversion, etc. required World Bank Category A B C F1 Projects are those whose impacts are Projects involve site Projects are mostly A proposed project is sensitive, diverse, and unprecedented, specific and immediate benign and are likely to classified as Category felt beyond the immediate project project environment have minimal or no FI if it involves environment and are potentially interactions, do not negative environmental investment of Bank irreversible over the long term. Such significantly affect impacts. Beyond funds through a projects require full EA. human populations, do screening, no further financial intermediary, not significantly alter EA action is required in sub-projects that natural systems and for a Category C may result in negative resources, do not project, although some environmental and consume much natural may require social impacts. resources (e.g., ground environmental and water) and have social action plans. negative impacts that are not sensitive, diverse, unprecedented and are mostly reversible. Category B projects will require partial EA, and environmental and social action plans. This World Bank categorization (A, B, & C) corresponds in principle with the Nigeria EIA requirements of Category (I, II and III), which in actual practice is done with regard to the level of impacts associated with a given project. However, in the event of divergence between the World Bank safeguard policies and the Nigeria EA laws, the World Bank Safeguards policies takes precedence over Nigeria EA laws, guidelines and standards. Thus for this ESMP, the Nigeria’s EIA requirements and World Bank safeguard policies were harmonized as far as possible. This is made responsive with regard to the following:  Early consideration of environmental and social issues (starting at the screening stage);  Identification and early consultation with stakeholders;  Prevention of negative environmental and social impacts through the consideration of feasible alternatives; and  Incorporation of mitigation measures into planning and (engineering) design. 14 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road 2.10 Adequacy of Legal Instruments for Environmental & Social Issues Generally with regard to environmental and social management issues, legislation is in a continuing process of development in Nigeria. Amongst the existing pieces of legislations highlighted above, there are a number of state, national and international environmental guidelines applicable to the sub- projects under the proposed IUFMP. In other words, Oyo State has a good governance framework and laws to back up and manage the environmental and social safeguard issues that shall be triggered. The Oyo Ministry of Environment and Habitat are conversant with the Environmental Assessment (EA) legislation, procedures and framework applicable based on the Federal EIA Act 86 of 1992. The main challenge would be enforcement of these legislation/guidelines. Thus as part of this ESMP, in order to support the due diligence process, to avoid causing harm and to ensure consistent treatment of environmental and social issues across the sub-project intervention areas, institutional capacity strengthening and funding have been recommended. 15 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road CHAPTER 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 River Culvert Study Area The Maje River – Maje - Idi Mango Road (Ogunpa River) priority site is located in Oluyole Local Government Area. The site falls within the Ibadan Metropolis and lies between x and y coordinates N7.31603 and E3.89197 at an altitude of 150msl. Figure 3.1: Maje Culvert Location 16 Refuse blocked the rings (up Damaged Culvert MajeSoka road on either side of damaged Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Plate 3.1: Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road (Ogunpa River) Schematic Layout Maje River flows through Maje/Idi-oro community in Oluyole LGA with culvert sited on Idi Mango road. The road crossing here is frequently overtopped, causing significant local disruption to social activities. The culvert is damaged and water flow through drains is hampered by water weeds. Culvert 17 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road is inadequate and needs to be replaced Drainage also requires reconstruction. Blockage by natural and anthropogenic debris (Plate 3.1) is a significant issue that further reduces the culvert capacity during times of flood. The topography of the project area of influence is a gentle slope and characterized by lateritic soils. The area receives surface water (upstream) from Ogbere River and flows to Ogunpa River. Vegetation in the area is composed mainly of high shrubs, grasses and water weeds. However, the original vegetation has been undergoing modifications due to urban expansions and human activities. Human activities have impacted on the environment resulting in series of environmental and social concerns such aquatic weeds restricting flow of water; high sediment/solid waste load in stream. 3.2 Description of the Proposed Intervention Works The proposed intervention works are according to the engineering designs and properties of the priority site, and are summarized in the Tables below as follows: Hydraulic Structure Size and Design Details (Table 3.1) Geometric and Pavement Data for Approach Roads (Table 3.2) Scope of Works for Road and Hydraulic Structures (Table 3.3) Proposed Built and Work Areas for Project Sites (Table 3.4) 18 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Table 3.1: Hydraulic Structure Size and Design Details Rectangular Flow Recommended Peak Section Structure Manning Flow Width Depth Free Areas Wetted Hydraulic Channel X Slope Coefficient Velocity Qpeak of Flow of Flow Board of Flow Perimeter Radius R RC RC – Section GPS % (n) (m/s) (m3/s) x (m) y (m) (m) A = xy P = x+2y = A/P Bridge Culvert (Xmm*Ymm) 3-Cells 3-Cells 598454N 808711E 4.52 0.15 1.3 78.27 15 4 1.71 60 23 2.61 3mx3.5m 3mx3.5m 9.0 x 5.5 Table 3.2: Geometric and Pavement Data for Approach Roads Stream Length Paved RC Side Drains Surveyed (m) Approach Width Pavement Structure (mm) (mm2) Road of Length/Width No of Up Down Length Roads of Adjoining Adjoining Subbase Base Asphaltic Right Left GPS Stream Stream (m) (m) Roads (m) Roads Course Course Overlay Side Side 598454N 808711E 1456 1475 900 7.3 75.0/7.3 5 200 200 50 750x750 750x750 Table 3.3: Scope of Works for Road and Hydraulic Structures Length of Approach Road Pavement Length of Approach Road No. of Adj. Drains Drains Structures (m) Pavement Structures (m) Rd/Width No of Cross to be to be Length of Hydraulic Appr. Asp Sub- Lined Adj. Asp Sub- Lined Access Culv./Width Retaining Desilted Repaired Stream Structure Road Halt Base Base Drain Road Halt Base base Drain Culvert (m) (m) Wall (m) (m) (m) Excav. (m) 3-Cells 3mx3.5m 900 900 900 900 1800 575 575 200 575 750 5/9.3 1/9.3 20 0 0 200 Table 3.4: Proposed Built and Work Areas for Project Sites Bridge Built Area Bridge Ramp Built Total Built Area Total Work Area Project Summary (m2) Area (m2) (m2) (m2) L (m) W (m) L (m) W (m) L (m) W (m) L (m) W (m) L (m) W (m) Box Culvert 3 (3m x 3.5m) n.a n.a n.a n.a 15.66 14.76 17.66 15 19 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road 3.2.1 Description of Possible Alternative Routes During Construction: There exist an alternative route to Maje community which will be useful during the construction of the Maje Culvert. Residents will have to approach Maje through Idi Mango street to Idi – Ewe to Transformer junction at Maje Area. Idi Mango Junction is some 1Km before the Maje culvert for residents coming from Soka area while Transformer junction is some 250m before the Maje culvert for residents coming from Maje community that wants to access the Soka area. This route will have to be worked upon as its present condition is not very motorable. Notable among some hindrances on this route is a stream flow with low volume and the road is very narrow. The said alternative route is less than 1km and will be graded at intervals during construction. 3.3 Project Activities The proposed works will be carried out in three phases namely; Pre-construction, Construction and Operational and Maintenance phases. Table 3.1: Proposed Activities Phase Proposed Activities Intervention Pre- Sensitization  Sensitize and inform community members on the time and duration of civil Construction Mobilisation works. Marking  Mobilize trucks, vehicles and other equipment and install camp office and Temporary workshop. access culvert  Mark the boundaries of the working areas around the site. Clearing  Construct a temporary pedestrian access culvert for community members and Safety measures other users;  Clear vegetation covering stream banks and widen banks appropriately  Evacuate obstacles such as silt and solid waste along stream  Install lightening and relevant road signage and barriers at construction site Construction Road works  Scarification;  Sub-grade preparation;  Earthworks;  Construction of base course and asphalt layers Side drains  Site clearing and excavation;  Drainage structure and facilities;  Retaining walls and earth – filling;  Any other ancillary works. Culvert works  Excavation, and stabilization  Construction of bed, and concrete screeding;  Construction of reinforced concrete wall (Abutments);  Construction of deck concrete;  Construction of parapet wall Post- Maintenance of  Regular clearing of culverts, drains and stream of silt and solid waste; Construction Culvert, Drains,  Regular checks and maintenance of road surface; /Operational Stream and  Checks and exchange of wearing course after number of years; /Maintenance access Road  Exchange of binder course after a number of years;  Routine inspections of foundations, joins etc;  Routine inspections of pavement; Maintenance of  Maintenance of road restraint systems; other ancillary  Maintenance of traffic control and information systems; facilities  Maintenance of road markings and studs;  Maintenance of fencing walls screens and environmental barriers; and  Maintenance of the road verge (including landscaping and rehabilitation). 20 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road CHAPTER 4 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ENVIRONMENT 4.1 Physical Environment 4.1.1 Climate /Meteorology The rainy season in Ibadan lasts from April to October and the dry season from November to March. The climate is determined by the movement of two air masses – the Dry Tropical Continental Air Mass (cT), which originates from the Sahara Desert and is responsible for the dry season, and the Moist Tropical Maritime (mT), from the Atlantic Ocean, which is responsible for the rainy season. Ibadan therefore has tropical rainy climate with an average annual rainfall of 1265.6mm (Figure 4.1). 40 35 30 25 Axis Title 20 15 10 5 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Ave mean Ave Min Ave Max Figure 4.1 Annual Rainfall for Ibadan (1925- Figure 4.2: Average Daily Temperature oC 2014) 120 600 500 100 400 80 Axis Title Axis Title 300 60 200 40 100 20 0 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Ave Mean Ave Min Ave Max Ave mean Ave Min Ave Max Figure 4.3: Average Daily Relative Humidity (%) Figure 4.4: Average Daily Solar Radiation (gm- cal/cm2) 21 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road 6 6 5 5 4 4 Axis Title Axis Title 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Ave Mean Ave Min Ave Max Ep Et Figure 4.5: Average Daily Wind Speed (mph) Figure 4.6: Computed Potential Evapotrsnapiration (Et) and IITA Evaporation (Ep) 4.1.2 Geology/Hydrogeology Ibadan city sits on a rolling topography with the basement rock types characterized by low porosity and permeability. The city sprawls on either side of Aremo and Mapo ridges. The upland areas are places above 200m. Among the upland areas is the central ridge called ‘Oke Aremo’. It has a north - south trend with a gap in its northern section through which Ogunpa river cuts its valley. The ridge is the main watershed from the headstream of the Ogunpa, Ona and Kudeti rivers. The highest point on the ridge is about 280m and this is at the Bower hill. The lowland areas are places below 200m. There is generally a decline in the elevation of the land from north-east to the south-east. The main rivers draining Ibadan are Ona, Ogunpa and Ogbere rivers with their tributaries, including the River Omi, Kudeti, Alaro, Alapata, Maje, Elere, etc. The city area sits on the basement complex rocksuit comprising older granite, quartz schists/quartzite and gneiss. There are ridges of quartzite/quartz schists, inselbergs of gneiss and older granite. These rocks are quite old predating the Pan African orogeny. Each rock type possesses its own typical failure plane. Gneiss foliations are marked by alternating white and black bands. In quartzite, micaceous bands constitute possible failure planes. The granite and granite gneiss complex have high residual stress, sub aerial weathering which enhances anisotropy. They also have deformability modules which vary non-linearly with micropetrographic quality index. In-situ permeability coefficient decreases with depth and their in-situ shear strength parameters increase with decrease in percentage water absorption. The branded gneiss always has faults fracture zones. The shear strength varies almost linearly with compressive strength. Loading gives rise to irrecoverable deformation and deformability increase linearly with strength. Quartzite and quartz schists have significant soil content. They can show toppling failure when disturbed. The yield of boreholes in quartz schists varies from 0.01 l/s to 6.0 l/s. In granitic rockmass, the yield varies from 0 to 4.0 l/s. The quality of the groundwater in basement complex is generally good. However, shallow groundwater can be easily polluted by high nitrate content and possible bacterial infection from sewage. 4.1.3 Hydrology The stretch of the river on either side of the culvert contains a sizeable volume of debris which reduces the effective carrying capacity of the river channel. This debris consists of fallen trees, shrubs, rocks and garbage. The volume of debris continually varies, mostly upwards, with the natural and human activities around the culvert; thus continually affecting the flow of the river. 22 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Runoff estimation Like most rivers in Nigeria, no flow data are available for the river. Hence, runoffs were computed from the rainfall and other climatic data indicated in the figures above. With the use of the water balance equation and using the computed potential evapo-transpiration, runoffs in cubic meters per second (cum/sec) for the river were estimated. From the runoff hydrographs in Figure 4.7, only one flow peak occurred in 1980 (August), and two peaks in 1990, 1999 and 2011 which occurred in July and October. Figure 4.7: Runoff Hydrograph for the river 4.1.4 Surface Water Quality Water is absolutely necessary to sustain life and an important resource for all economic activities relating to exploration and production activities. Pollution of water is an impairment of water quality by man’s activity, causing an actual hazard to public health or impairment beneficial use of water. The aquatic environment is an intricate system of living and non-living elements. Physical, chemical and biological factors influencing water quality are so interrelated that a change in any water quality parameter triggers on other changes in a complex network of the interrelated variables. Often it is difficult to categorize the nature of these interrelationships that may result from man’s activity and influence on the entire water system. All natural waters have the capacity to assimilate certain amounts of waste without apparent effect upon the environment, thus all natural waters have self- purification properties. The summary of the physico-chemical characteristics of the water samples from the study area is presented in Table 4.1. The water bodies were slightly alkaline and had pH values varying from 8.61 - 8.76, the values fell within the tolerable limits for surface waters of pH 6 –9 stipulated by FMENV. The total dissolved solids varied from 128 – 141mg/l, electrical conductivity, which is a measure of the ionic richness of the river course, ranged between 247.0 and 270.0μs/cm, the alkalinity ranged from 5.33 to 6.06mg/l, the BOD values ranged from 5.52mg/l – 7.03mg/l, these values were all below the limit recommended for surface waters by DPR/FMENV. The results of the heavy metals analysed 23 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road show that all the metals occurred in trace levels or very minute quantities far below recommended limits set by FMENV. Table 4.1: Physicochemical Characteristics of Surface water Parameter Downstream Midstream Upstream FMEnv. Limits pH 8.7 8.61 8.76 6-9 Ec/ms 264.0 270.0 247.0 - Temp Co 30.6 32.1 30.6 <40 mg/l Mn 0.165 0.169 0.182 5 mg/l Fe 4.623 4.269 4.482 20 mg/l Cu 0.06 0.03 0.02 <1.0 mg/l Zn 0,04 0.03 0.06 <1.0 mg/l Cd 0.00 0.00 0.00 <1.0 mg/l Pb 0.00 0.00 0.00 <1.0 mg/l Cl 124.32 126.52 126.81 600 mg/l BI Carbonate 13.92 18.71 29.17 - mg/l NH3N 0.704 0.365 0.989 20 mg/l SO42- 0.187 0.183 0.179 500 mg/l Alkalinity 5.33 5.74 6.06 - mg/l PO4 0.82 0.78 0.56 5 mg/l TDS 139.0 141.0 128.0 2000 mg/l TSS 1.532 1.523 1.489 30 Hardness mg/l 0.562 0.487 0.456 200 mg/l DO 7.0 7.9 8.0 - mg/l BOD 7.03 6.86 6.52 30 4.1.5 Soil Quality The composite physicochemical analysis of the soil in the area is predominantly sandy and moderately acidic with total acidity values ranging from 47.88 - 50.25mg/l. The total nitrogen concentration varied from 0.871 to 1.304%, while the available phosphorus concentration varied from 1.36 to 1.87mg/kg, the heavy mental concentrations of the soils were low and were dominated by iron (Table 4.2). The relatively high level of iron may be attributed to the underlying rocks where the soils of Ibadan region were formed. The major soil groups are the ferruginous soils. Table 4.2: Physcio chemical characteristics of soils FMEnv. Parameter TS1 SS I TS 2 SS2 TS3 SS3 Limit mg/l Total Acidity 33.00 33.00 36.84 31.92 35.50 35.50 - % Nitrogen 1.304 1.147 0.956 0.871 1.045 1.123 - Avail P mg/kg 1.36 1.42 1.87 1.75 1.46 1,41 1.00 Cmol/kg Ca 7.35 8.44 5.63 6.13 2.36 2.36 - Cmol/kg Mg 1.46 1.34 1.04 1.17 1.47 1.47 - Cmol/kg K 0.34 0.32 0.34 0.35 0.58 0.56 - mg/kg Mn 3.46 4.62 1.82 1.61 0.78 0.81 0.20 mg/kg Fe 26.26 24.58 18.29 18.46 23.13 24.14 1.50 mg/kg Cu 0.034 0.023 0.018 0.021 0.104 0.104 0.10 mg/kg Zn 0.021 0.008 0.014 0.012 0.020 0.022 0.01 mg/kg Pb 5.67 4.82 4.61 4.00 11.00 10.85 - mg/kg Pb 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION % Sand 55 55 55 55 32 32 - % Silt 35 35 36 36 48 48 - % Clay 10 10 9 9 20 20 - TS – Top soil, SS – Sub soil 24 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road 4.1.6 Air Quality and Noise Level The range of values of concentrations of the various air quality parameters measured showed that the levels of suspended particulate matter (36.0 – 78.0 μg/m3), nitrogen dioxide (<0.01ppm), sulphur dioxide (<0.01ppm), hydrogen sulphide (<0.01ppm) and carbon monoxide (<0.01ppm), were within the Federal Ministry of Environment (FMENV) permissible limits (Table 4.3). The ambient noise levels in the study area ranged between 60.8 – 69.7dB (A) Table. These levels are within the FMEnv permissible exposure limits of 90dB (A) per day. . Table 4.3: Air Quality and Noise Measurements in the Study Area Parameter Unit FMEnv Point 1 Point 2 Point 3 Standards N7.31607 N7.31562 N 7.31643 E 3.89196 E3.89208 E 3.89183 CO Ppm 10 1.0 3.0 2.0 SO2 Ppm 0.14 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 O2 % 20.5-20.9 20.8 20.8 20.8 NO2 Ppm 0.06 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 H2S 0.008 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 SPM µg/m3 150 54.0 52.0 50.0 Noise Db 90 60.8 69.7 67.8 Source: Fieldwork, June 2016 4.2 Biological Environment 4.2.1 Vegetation The study site was covered by two transects (Plate 4.1a-e). Transect 1 (7.31617 N & 3.89202 E (elev. 160m) to 7.31618 N & 3.89248 E (157m)) (Plate 4.1 a-c) located upstream was composed of a few trees and shrubs such as Ceiba pentandra, Elaeis guineensis, Bambusa vulgaris, Musa sp and Raphia hookeri. Shrubs are Sida rhombifolia, Urena lobata, Ricinus communis, Solanum torvum, Senna obtusifolia, Senna occidentalis, Senna hirsuta and Chromolaena odorata. The grasses and sedges in the transect were Mariscus alternifolius, Setaria barbata, Panicum maximum, Imperata cylindrica, Cyperus iria, Eleusine indica, Elytrophorus spicatus and Sorghum arundinaceum while the weeds encountered were Centrosema pubescens, Momordica charanthia, Mucuna pruriens, Thaumatococcus daniellii, Euphorbia hirta, Vigna unguiculata, Alternanthera sessilis, Alternanthera brasiliana, Corchorus aestuans, Lagenaria breviflorus, croton lobatus, Colocasia esculenta, Laportea aestuans, Tithonia diversifolia, Paulinia pinnata, Cleome rutidospermum, Solenostemon monostachyus, Aerva lanata, Amaranthus spinosus, Colocynthis citrullus, Ipomoea triloba, Ipomoea involucrata, Mimosa pudica, Phyllanthus niruri, Commelina benghalensis, Synedrella nodiflora and Luffa cylindrica. Species encountered in transect 2 (7.31601 N & 3.89169 E (elev. 159m) (Plate 4.1d-c) were mostly weeds with very sparse trees and shrubs such as, Bambusa vulgaris and Ficus exasperata. Solanum torvum, Senna occidentalis, Senna hirsuta, Urena lobata, Lantana camara, Triumfetta cordifolia, Triumfetta pentandra, Ocimum gratissimum, Sida corymbosa, Sida rhombifolia, Stachytarpheta cayenensis, Abelmoschus esculentus and Chromolaena odorata. The weeds were Aerva lanata, Alternanthera sessilis, Agerantum conyzoides, Euphorbia hysssopifolia, Heliotropium indicum, Tridax procumbens, Acalypha fimbrata, Vernonia cinera, Ruelia tuberosa, Scoparia dulcis, Mimosa pudica, Mucuna pruriens, Desmodium scopiurus, Phyllanthus niruri, Centrosema pubescens, Amaranthus spinosus, Ludwigia abysinica, Ludwigia decurrens, Phyllanthus muellerianum, Sclerocarpus africanus, Celosia sp, Mimosa sp, Euphorbia hirta, Mitracarpus villosus, Lagenaria breviflora, Laportea aestuans, Biden pilosa, Boerhavia erecta, Physalis angulata, Gomphrena celosioides, Ipomoea triloba, Ipomoea mauritiana, Synedrella nodiflora, Commelina benghalensis, Corchorus olitorius, Corchorus aestuans and Oldenlandia corymbosa. The grasses and sedge encountered were Sorghum arundinaceum, Imperata cylindrica, Maricus alternifolius, Cyperus sp, Setaria barbata, Eleusine indica, Paspalum scrobiculatum, Panicum laxum, Elytrophorus spicatus, Pentodon pentendrus, Cynodon dactylon and Panicum maximum The coaster vegetation upstream of the river has been cleared to about 150m away from the bridge (Plate 4.1b). However, the vegetation at about 170m away from the bridge could still serve as buffer 25 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road and habitat for fauna especially the Bambusa vulgaris thicket. Eighty-four species of plant were documented in this study consisting of 6 trees (7%), 16 shrubs (19%), 50 herbs (60%), 10 grasses (6%) and 2 sedges (2%) (Figure 1). Most of the trees and shrubs are useful as food, medicine or ornamentals while majority of the herbs are weeds. The most prominent plants with their Relative Importance Values (RIV) are Corchorus olitorius (2.7%), Ipomoea mauritiana (2.0%), Alternanthera sessilis (2.0%), Ipomoea triloba (1.2%), Aerva lanata (0.9%), Ipomoea involucrata (0.8%), Gomphrena celosioides (0.8%), Ludwigia decurrens (0.7%), Ludwigia abysinica (0.7%), Centrosema pubescens (0.7%), Celosia inserti (0.7%), Commelina benghalensis (0.7%), Thaumatococcus daniellii (0.7%), Phyllanthus muellerinum (0.7%), Phyllanthus niruri (0.7%), Tithonia diversifolia (0.7%), Alternanthera brasiliana (0.7%) (Table 4.6). Table 4.4: Flora Species list of the Maje/Idi mangoro site S/no Taxa Common Names Life form Family RIV% Economic importance 1 Ficus exasperata Fig tree Tree Moraceae 0.1 Medicine/food 2 Bambusa vulgaris Bambu Tree Poaceae 0.02 Medicine 3 Raphia hookeri Tree Palmae 0.04 Medicine 4 Elaeis guineensis Oil palm Tree Palmae 0.04 Food/medicine 5 Ceiba pentandra Tree Bombaceae 0.02 Medicine/food 6 Musa sp Banana Tree Musaceae 0.2 Food/medicine 7 Senna occidentalis tea senna Shrub Papilionoideae 0.1 Medicine 8 Senna hirsuta Shrub Papilionoideae 0.3 Medicine 9 Solanium torvum Shrub Solanaceae 0.1 Medicine 10 Chromolaena odorata Siam weed Shrub Asteraceae 0.2 Weed/medicine 11 Sida corymbosa Shrub Malvaceae 0.2 Weed/medicine 12 Sida rhombifolia Wire weed Shrub Malvaceae 0.2 Weed/medicine 13 Urena lobata Hibiscus bur Shrub Malvaceae 0.1 Weed 14 Stachytarpheta cayenensis Shrub Verbenaceae 0.2 Medicine 15 Lantana camara Shrub Verbenaceae 0.1 Medicine 16 Senna obtusifolia Shrub Papilionoidea 0.1 Medicine 17 Ricinus communis Shrub Euphorbiaceae Medicine 18 Triumfetta pentandra Shrub Malvaceae Weed 19 Triumfetta cordifolia Shrub Malvaceae Weed 20 Abelmoschus esculentus Okra Shrub Malvaceae Food 21 Sida acuta Broom weed Shrub Malvaceae 0.2 Weed/medicine 22 Ocimum gratissimum Shrub lamiaceae Medicine 23 Oldenlandia corymbosa Herb Rubiaceae 0.7 Weed 24 Vigna unguiculata Beans Crawler Papilionioidea 0.6 Food 25 Tithonia diversifolia Herb Asteraceae 0.2 Weed 26 Corchorus aestuans Herb Malvaceae 0.2 Weed/medicine 27 Corchorus olitorius Herb Malvaceae 0.2 Weed/medicine 28 Ludwigia decurrens Herb Onagraceae 0.9 Weed 29 Ludwigia abyssinica Herb Onagraceae 0.4 Weed 30 Euphorbia hyssopifolia Spunge weed Herb Euphorbiaceae 0.2 Weed/medicine 31 Euphorbia hirta Snake weed Herb Euphorbiaceae 0.6 Weed/medicine 32 Colocasia esculenta Coco yam Herb Araceae Food 33 Tridax procumbens Herb Asteraceae Weed 34 Laportea aestuans Tropical nettle Herb Urticaceae 0.3 Weed/medicine 35 Scoparia dulcis Herb Scopulariaceae 0.2 Weed/medicine 36 Gomphrena celosioides Herb Amaranthaceae 0.1 Weed 37 Desmodium scorpiurus Begger weed Herb Leguminosae 0.4 Weed 38 Amaranthus spinosus Spiny amaranth Herb Amaranthaceae 0.3 Weed 39 Phyllanthus niruri Stone breaker Herb Euphorbiaceae 0.3 Weed/medicine 40 Alternanthera sessilis Herb Amaranthaceae 0.8 Weed 41 Alternanthera brasiliana Herb Amaranthaceae 0.8 Weed 42 Ipomoea mauritiana Herb Convulvulaceae 1.5 Weed/food 43 Luffa cylindrica Sponge Herb Cucurbitaceae 0.5 Weed/medicine 44 Commelina benghalensis Tropical Herb Commelinaceae 0.6 Weed spidermont 45 Centrosema pubescens Herb Leguminosae 0.4 Medicine 46 Aerva lanata Herb Amaranthaceae 0.7 Weed 47 Colocynthis citrullus Melon Herb Curcubitaceae 0.3 Food/medicine 48 Croton lobatus Herb Euphorbiaceae 0.3 Weed 49 Acalypha fimbrata Copper leaf plant Herb Euphorbiaceae 0.2 Weed 50 Solenostemon Herb Lamiaceae 0.3 Weed 26 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road S/no Taxa Common Names Life form Family RIV% Economic importance monostachyus 51 Mitracarpus villosus Herb Rubiaceae 0.3 Weed 52 Desmodium scorpiurus Begger weed Herb Leguminosae 0.5 Weed 53 Mucuna pruriens Crawler Leguminosae- 0.9 Weed 54 Cleome rutidospermum spider flower Herb Capparidaceae 0.3 Weed 55 Ruelia tuberosa Fever root Herb Acanthaceae 0.3 Medicine 56 Lagenaria breviflorus Wild colocynth Herb Cucurbitaceae 0.4 Weed 57 Ipomoea triloba Herb Convulvulaceae 1.3 Weed 58 Ipomoea involucrata Herb Convulvulaceae 1.3 Weed 59 Synedrella nodiflora Herb Compositae 0.1 Weed/medicine 60 Heliotropium indicum Cock comb Boraginaceae 0.3 Medicine 61 Momordica charanthia Crawler Cucurbitaceae 0.6 Medicine 62 Sclerocarpus africanus Herb Asteraceae 0.2 Weed 63 Phyllanthus muellerianum Herb Euphorbiaceae 0.6 Weed/medicine 64 Thaumatococcus daniellii Herb Marantaceae Medicine 65 Paullinia pinnata Herb Sapindaceae Medicine 66 Agerantum conyzoides Herb Asteraceae Medicine 67 Celosia sp Herb Amaranthaceae Food 68 Biden pilosa Herb Asteraeae 0.9 Weed 69 Venonia cinera Herb Vernoniaceae Weed 70 Physalis angulata Herb Solanaceae 0.5 Weed/medicine 71 Boerhavia erecta Herb Nyctaginaceae 0.6 Weed 72 Panicum maximum Guinea grass Grass Gramineae 0.5 Weed 73 Mariscus alternifolius Sedge Cyperaceae 0.1 Weed 74 Cyperus iria Sedges Cyperaceae Weed 75 Setaria barbata Bristle foxtail Grass Gramineae 0.2 Weed 76 Sorghum arundinaceum Grass Graminae 0.4 Food/medicine 77 Imperata cylindrica Grass Graminae 0.2 Weed 78 Eleusine indica Bull grass Grass Graminae 0.5 Weed 79 Paspalum scrobiculatum, Grass Graminae 0.1 Weed 80 Panicum laxum, Grass Graminae 0.2 Weed 81 Elytrophorus spicatus, Grass Graminae 0.3 Weed 82 Cynodon dactylon Grass Graminae 0.2 Weed 83 Pentodon pentandrus, Grass Graminae 0.3 Weed 84 Mimosa invisa Giant sensitive Herb Mimosaceae 0.2 Weed plant 27 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road a b c d e Plate 4.1(a-e): Vegetation around Maje/Idi mangoro culvert Photograph showing the in the study site a: Showing the lower crossing of the culvert blocked by debris upstream transects 1 b: Showing cleared stream bank upstream transect 1 c: Showing vegetation about 170m upstream transects 1 d: Showing vegetation serving as buffer downstream transects 2 e: Showing the culvert bed and surrounding vegetation downstream transects 2 28 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road 4.2.2 Microbiology The Total Coliform Counts per ml of the surface water and soil samples analyzed are shown in Table 4.7. Generally, total coliform counts ranged from 1.4 x 103cfu/ml to 5 × 104cfu/ml. While no growth was found in soil samples Table 4.6 The total coliform test is considered an indicator, since the presence of bacteria indicates the possibility, that disease organisms may also be present in water. When total coliforms are absent there is a very low probability of disease organisms being present in the water. The ability of the total coliform test to reliably predict the bacterial safety of water relative to the hundreds of possible diseases is critical since it is impossible, in a practical sense, to frequently check for every type of disease causing organism. These organisms are also prolific in the soil. Table 4.5: Water Microbiology Coliform Count 10-1 10-3 CFU/ML 10-1 CFU/ML10-3 SW1 (Downstream) 54 14 5.4 x103 1.4 x 105 SW2 (Midstream) 43 12 4.3 x103 1.2 x 105 SW3 (Upstream) 36 7 3.6 x 103 7.0 x 104 NG- No Growth, Cfu - Colony Forming Unit Table 4.6: Soil Microbiology Coliform Count 10-3 10-5 CFU/ML 10-3 CFU/ML10-5 TS1 NG NG NG NG SS1 NG NG NG NG TS2 18 NG 1.8 x 105 NG SS2 14 NG 1.4 x 105 NG TS3 5 NG 5.0 x 104 NG SS3 1 NG 1.0 x 104 NG 4.2.3 Wild Life 4.2.3.1 Fauna resources Eight fauna species including 2 Mammalia (25%), 2 Aves (25%) and 4 Arthropoda (50%) were documented from the project site (Table 2). The most prominent fauna and their Relative Importance value (RIV) are Insi formicidae (3.8%), Zenaida sp (1.5%) and Rattus rattus (1.3%) (Table 4.7). There were no endangered fauna species encountered in the project site. Table 4.7: Fauna species list of the around the study area site. S/No Animal Name Class Scientific Name RIV (%) 1 Rat Mammalia Rattus rattus 1.3 2 Dog Mammalia Canis lupus familiaris 0.7 3 Dove Bird/Aves Zenaida sp 1.5 4 Chicken Bird/Aves Gallus gallus domesticus 0.5 5 Spider Arthropoda Eriophora sp 0.08 6 Soldier ant Arthropoda Insi formicidae 3.8 7 Blue Morpho Butterfly Arthropoda Morpho peleides 0.8 8 Millipede Arthropoda Archispirostreptus gigas 0.04 4.3 Waste Management 4.3.1 Waste Management Practice The waste generated within Ibadan metropolis comprises mainly of leaves, paper, food waste, tins, glass wares, building construction waste and rags. This is because Ibadan is located in the heart of a rich agricultural land and has a large old and unplanned section. Generally, wastes are being dumped indiscriminately in the city by the populace; in several part of the city wastes are dumped on side drains, roads, streams, canals, open land spaces and bushes. This practice has contributed to the 29 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road frequent occurrence of flooding in the city. Government has made some efforts to clean up the city through Oyo State Waste Management Authority (OYOSWMA) but there is need for more action to be taken. 4.4 Socio-economics 4.4.1 Social Organisation The people are predominantly Yoruba. The social organisation revolves around community leaders including the traditional ruler, Community Development Associations (CDA) executives and other opinion leaders. Thus, the issue of the bridge and its attendant impacts on the community are taken up by any or the three groups. This was clearly revealed during the administration of questionnaires and interviews in which members of CDAs participated actively. 4.4.2 Infrastructural Facilities Major complaint in the community was inadequacy and non-functional infrastructural facilities. The community has some basic infrastructural and social facilities including electricity and roads but they were ineffective hence source of water for domestic use is mainly from wells and boreholes. The bad state of these facilities was obvious during the on-the-spot assessments in the community and during the interactions in various fora that were held with the community members. 4.4.3 Demography Ibadan, the capital city of Oyo State and the third largest metropolitan area in Nigeria, after Lagos and Kano, is highly exposed to flooding. The city has a population of 3 million1 and a growth rate of 3.4% (City of Ibadan, 2013). It is the largest metropolitan geographical area in West Africa (1,190 sq mi or 3,080 km2) with a highly built up and dense population. The city is frequently exposed to floods. Ibadan experienced geometrical increase in population between 1851 and 1921. By 1856 the population was estimated at 60,000 which rose to over 200,000 in 1890, 238,094 in 1921, and 386,359 in 1931. The 1991 census in Nigeria put the population at 1,222,570 with a density of 475.11 persons per square kilometer. Its population is estimated to be about 2,559,853 people according to the 2006 estimates. Its projected population by 2010, using 3.2 percent growth rate, is about 2,893,137 (See Table 4.9 below). Table 4.8: Distribution of the population in the 11 LGAs of Ibadan S/N Growth rate LGA March 2006 2006 Census 2006-2012 (March) 1991-2006 Male Female Total Total Male Female 1 Ibadan NE 1.29 163,844 167,600 331,444 358,043 176,993 181,050 2 Ibadan N 0.13 152,608 155,511 308,119 310,600 153,837 156,763 3 Ibadan NW 0.28 75,410 78,619 154,029 156,661 76,699 79,963 4 Ibadan SE 1.16 130,334 136,123 266,457 285,579 139,687 145,892 5 Ibadan SW 0.15 139,622 143,476 283,098 285,670 140,891 144,780 6 Akinyele 2.88 105,594 106,217 211,811 251,808 125,534 126,274 7 Egbeda 5.47 137,527 146,116 283,643 393,879 190,976 202,903 8 Ido 4.63 52,465 51,622 104,087 137,440 69,276 68,163 9 Lagelu 4.11 74,220 73,913 148,133 204,083 102,253 101,830 10 Ona Ara 5.37 130,615 134,956 265,571 366,470 180,240 186,230 11 Oluyole 5.57 102,371 101,090 203,461 284,255 143,022 141,233 Source: Federal Republic of Nigeria official gazette of 2nd February 2009 No. 2 Vol. 96. 30 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Table 4.9: The population growth of Ibadan (1856-2010) Year Population 1856 60,000 1890 200,000 1921 238,094 1931 386,359 1991 1,222,570 2006 2,550,593 2010 2,893,137 Source: Wahab (2011) 4.3.4 Economic activities Ibadan is located at a strategic location on the operational railway route in the Southern region connecting Lagos to Kano in the North of Nigeria. It is a major trade stop for traders who trade in cassava, cocoa, cotton, timber, rubber and palm oil. The main industries in the area include the processing of agricultural products; tobacco processing and cigarette (manufacture); flour mills, leather-working and furniture-making. There is abundance of clay, kaolin and aquamarine in its environs, and there are several cattle ranches, a diary farm as well as a commercial abattoir in Ibadan. Table 4.10 below lists the economic activities in Ibadan city. Table 4.10: Economic activities in Ibadan Agricultural Cottage Industry Other industries/Institutes Tourist attractions products Yams Cotton spinning Cannery Ibadan University Zoo Corn (Maize) Weaving Brewery Agodi Zoological Garden Cassava (manioc) Dyeing Publishing Beans Leather working (sheep and goat Tobacco-processing skins) Millet Wood carving Wood and steel furniture Plantain Mat making Motor vehicle assembly plant Tobacco International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) Cocoa Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria (CRIN) Palm oil and Palm Federal Research Institute of Kernels Nigeria (FRIN) Cotton Kola nuts Fruits 4.3.5 Solid waste generation There are 4 dumpsites located at the cardinal points of Ibadan city. These dumpsites are Lapite, Ajakanga, Aba-Eku and Awotan (Table 4.11 below). Table 4.11: Dumpsite Areas in Ibadan Cardinal points Name Size (Hectares) North Lapite 9 South Ajakanga 20 East Aba-Eku 20 West Awotan 50 Source: Official information by Oyo State Waste Management Authority The solid waste composition in Ibadan comprises leaves, paper, food waste, tins, glass and rags. This is because Ibadan is located in the heart of a rich agricultural land and has a large old and unplanned section 31 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Male and female respondents were 58 and 42 percent respectively. A half of the respondents were in their active productive age of between 21 and 40 years of age. Only 3.2% of them were below 21 years, while 11% were above 61 years. Two third of them were married, just as 23.2 percent were still single and never married. The respondents were also literate as 45 percent have completed secondary school and additional 24 percent has post-secondary school education. Occupationally, they were mostly involved in trading (36%) and artisan (25%), however, there were quite a number civil servants (10.6%) and professional (9.2%) included in the survey as well. About six percent of them have retired from their occupation, while 2.8 were unemployed. A half of the respondents earned between N10,000 and N20,000 income monthly, while those in the category of N20,001 to N30,000 monthly income were (13.3%). About 60 percent of the respondents have lived in the community for at least seven years. There are three main sources of energy for lighting namely, private generator (43%), rechargeable lamp (30%) and the national grid (25%). However, more than half of the respondents relied on kerosene as their energy source for cooking, just as 23 percent of them depended on gas for cooking. More respondents used firewood (9.2%) than those using electricity (5.6%) to cook. Burning was the dominant method of disposing waste in the community. A sizeable percentage of them also engaged the services of organised private waste disposal organisation. They also disposed waste into open dump, nearby river channel as well as burying. About 43 percent of them own a private car for transporting their family member, just as a sizable number own motorcycle. Motorcycle and car were however, the most frequently patronised mode of transportation. Table 4.12: Socio-economic Characteristics of Respondents Variable Options Frequency Percentage Gender of Respondent Male 82 57.7 Female 60 42.3 Total 142 100.0 Age <21 years 4 3.2 21-30 years 29 23.0 31-40 years 35 27.8 41-50 years 29 23.0 51-60 years 15 11.9 Above 61years 14 11.1 Total 126 100.0 Marital Status Single/Never Married 31 23.3 Married 100 75.2 Separated 0 0.0 Divorced 0 0.0 Widow 2 1.5 Total 133 100.0 Highest Education No Formal 7 4.9 Primary School Not Completed 4 2.8 Primary School Completed 7 4.9 Secondary School Not Completed 18 12.7 Secondary School Completed 64 45.1 Post Secondary Education 34 23.9 Koranic Education 3 2.1 Other (specify) 5 3.5 Total 142 100.0 Occupation Civil servants 15 10.6 Farming 2 1.4 32 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Variable Options Frequency Percentage Fishing 0 0.0 Artisan 36 25.4 Trading 51 35.9 Professional 13 9.2 Retired 8 5.6 Unemployed 4 2.8 Others Specify 13 9.2 Total 142 100.0 Estimated Monthly income <₦10,000 6 8.0 ₦10,000-20,000 38 50.7 ₦20,001-30,000 10 13.3 ₦30,001-40,000 7 9.3 ₦40,001-50,000 5 6.7 ₦50,001-60,000 2 2.7 Above ₦60,000 7 9.3 Total 75 100.0 How long have you lived in this 1-3 21 18.6 community (Years)' 4-6 16 14.2 7-10 43 38.1 11-20 23 20.4 21-30 5 4.4 Above 30 5 4.4 Total 113 100.0 Energy source for lighting used Hurricane Lamp 15 6.8 by household Rechargeable Lamp 57 25.9 Private Generators 94 42.7 IBEDC (National Grid) 54 24.5 Energy for cooking Firewood 16 9.2 Charcoal 3 1.7 Kerosene 106 61.3 Gas 40 23.1 Electricity 8 4.6 Saw dust 0 0.0 Waste disposal Burying 5 3.2 Busy 4 2.5 Burning 97 61.4 Open dump 13 8.2 Organised Collection by private organisation 27 17.1 Organised Collection by government 3 1.9 Dumped in the nearby river channel 7 4.4 Dumped in the nearby gutter 2 1.3 Sort of transport family own Bicycle 3 2.6 Motorcycle 42 36.5 Tricycle 2 1.7 Car 49 42.6 33 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Variable Options Frequency Percentage Truck 1 0.9 Bus 0 0.0 Others, Specify 18 15.7 Total 115 100.0 Mode of transport frequently use Bicycle 5 4 Motorcycle 85 62 Tricycle 4 3 Car 30 22 Truck 0 0 Bus 0 0 Others, Specify 13 10 Total 137 100 4.4.6 Characteristics of Building (House) and Neighbourhood A significant percentage (46.5%) of the respondents lived in bungalow sort of housing, while relatively smaller number of them lived in self-contain (30%) and one room apartment (20%). Two third of the houses were built with plastered cement block and 20 percent with cement block. The two major sources of drinking water are the protected dug well (60%) and borehole powered by pumping machine (26%), however, a few of them (3%) collected water from unprotected dug well. Almost all the respondents (88%) have access to flush or pour flush toilets, but some still use pit latrine albeit a small number (6.4%) and bush (4.3%). Very insignificant percentage of them think that the road network to the community was good, but 28 percent of them were of the view that the roads are fair; just as about 70.4 percent submitted that the roads are in poor shape. The roads within the community are poor. Again, less than six percent of them perceived the schools in the community to be good, while high percentage (26.8%) were of the opinion that the schools are fair and a higher percentage (68%) poor. Majority of the respondents seems to be unsatisfied with the condition of public health institutions in the community as 70 percent and 25.4 percent of them think that the health institution are poor and fair respectively. More than half of respondents considered potable water and public electricity are in a poor state. While communication facilities are relatively fair, public recreation facilities were in absolutely poor condition. Table 4.13: Characteristics of Building (House) and Neibourhood Variable Options Frequency Percentage Sort of housing does your Bungalow 66 46.5 household live Duplex 2 1.4 Detached 3 2.1 Semidetached 1 0.7 One room apartment 28 19.7 Self-contain 42 29.6 Total 142 100.0 Type of materials used for your Wood/Wood log 1 0.7 house Brick/Mud 1 0.7 Cement Block 28 20.3 Plastered brick/mud 11 8.0 Plastered cement block 96 69.6 Any other, specify 1 0.7 Total 138 100.0 34 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Variable Options Frequency Percentage Source of drinking water for Public tap 3 2.1 members of HH Borehole with pump 37 26.4 Protected dug well 81 57.9 Rainwater collection 3 2.1 Bottled water 2 1.4 Unprotected dug well 4 2.9 Other 10 7.1 Total 140 100.0 Toilet facility do members of HH Flush or pour flush toilet 125 88.7 usually use Pit latrine 9 6.4 Bucket toilet 0 0.0 Bush 6 4.3 Others, specify 1 0.7 Total 141 100.0 Roads to the community Good 2 1.4 Fair 40 28.2 Poor 100 70.4 Total 142 100.0 Roads within the community Good 0 0.0 Fair 27 19.0 Poor 115 81.0 Total 142 100.0 Schools in the community Good 8 5.6 Fair 38 26.8 Poor 96 67.6 Total 142 100.0 Public Health Institutions Good 6 4.2 Fair 36 25.4 Poor 100 70.4 Total 142 100.0 Potable Water Good 10 7.0 Fair 43 30.3 Poor 89 62.7 Total 142 100.0 Public Electricity Good 1 0.7 Fair 24 16.9 Poor 117 82.4 Total 142 100.0 Communication facilities Good 4 2.8 Fair 80 56.3 Poor 58 40.8 Total 142 100.0 Public recreation facilities Good 3 2.4 Fair 22 17.6 Poor 100 80.0 35 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Variable Options Frequency Percentage Total 125 100.0 4.4.7 Flood impacts Road has been washed away and culvert washed off as a result of flood. There are few pot hole and some cases of collapsed culvert which hindered movement generally. Again, socio-economic aspects of electricity and livelihoods have high negative impacts. Almost every member in the community was significantly affected, but the women and elderly were mostly affected. Table 4.14: Flood Impacts Variable Options Frequency Percentage Impact of the flood event on road Wash the road away 102 72.3 infrastructure Cause pot holes 27 19.1 Cut off the road completely 11 7.8 Other 1 0.7 Total 141 100.0 Impact of the flood event on Wash off the bridge 57 41.0 bridge/culvert infrastructure Collapsed the bridge 43 30.9 Undermine/Weaken the bridge 38 27.3 Others, Specify 1 0.7 Total 139 100.0 Impact of the flood event on Hinders movement 85 62.0 accessibility to the community Block access completely 29 21.2 Block access for some time 14 10.2 Block vehicular movement 9 6.6 Others specify 0 0.0 Total 137 100.0 Highly Negative Negative No Effect Socio-economic aspects Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage Livelihoods 96 70.1 25 18.2 16 11.7 Assets 83 61.9 34 25.4 17 12.7 Housing 79 58.5 31 23.0 25 18.5 Health 72 52.2 38 27.5 28 20.3 Education 69 50.0 45 32.6 24 17.4 Production/productivity 70 51.5 50 36.8 16 11.8 Income earning/profit 73 52.5 49 35.3 17 12.2 Electricity supply 101 74.3 25 18.4 10 7.4 Access to safe water source 68 50.0 45 33.1 23 16.9 Ease of movement 82 59.0 40 28.8 17 12.2 Displacement 72 53.3 38 28.1 25 18.5 Ease of access to neighbouring 78 56.5 46 33.3 14 10.1 communities Affected Less Affected No Difference Category of people Freq. % Freq. % Freq. % Children 132 95.0 4 2.9 3 2.2 Youth 131 95.6 2 1.5 4 2.9 36 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Variable Options Frequency Percentage Adult 130 92.9 7 5.0 3 2.1 The Edlerly 133 95.7 1 0.7 5 3.6 Women 129 94.9 4 2.9 3 2.2 The Handicapped 125 94.7 4 3.0 3 2.3 4.4.8 Anticipated Positive and Negative Impact of the Proposed project More than seventy percent of the respondents are aware of the project. To a large extent, it will increase employment opportunity and perhaps business opportunity. However, there is a high possibility of pressure on existing infrastructure and of influx of population. Okada rider transport business will improve significantly just as tricycle operators and car/bus businesses will equally improve. Table 4.15: Anticipated Positive and Negative Impact of the Proposed project Variable Options Frequency Percentage Level of awareness about Very aware 72 53 the project in the Moderately aware 28 20 community Not aware 37 27 Total 137 100 Positive Impacts Increase in employment opportunity 85 43.4 Increase in land price 19 9.7 More value for local product 28 14.3 Better infrastructure Facility 24 12.2 Increase in business opportunity 40 20.4 Negative Impacts Pressure on existing infrastructure 68 44.7 Influx of population 63 41.4 Conflict with outsiders 9 5.9 Increase in antisocial elements 12 7.9 Effect of the project on Improve their business 116 83.5 okada riders Reduce their business 14 10.1 Will have not effect 9 6.5 Total 139 100.0 Effect of the project on Improve their business 105 75.0 tricycle operator Reduce their business 26 18.6 Will have no effect 9 6.4 Total 140 100.0 Effect of the project on Improve their business 101 74.3 car/bus drivers Reduce their business 27 19.9 Will have no effect 8 5.9 Total 136 100.0 4.4.9 Effect of the Maje Culvert Rehabilitation Project Maje respondents indicated that all categories of users will be affected by the culvert rehabilitation project. The respondents reported that children (79.4%), Handicapped (77.9%), the elderly (75.7%), women (75%), youth (74.3%) and adults (73.5%). 37 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Table 4.16: Effect of the Maje Culvert Rehabilitation Project Category of people Affected Less Affected No Difference Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage Children 108 79.4 18 13.2 10 7.4 Youth 101 74.3 25 18.4 10 7.4 Adult 100 73.5 26 19.1 10 7.4 Elderly 103 75.7 23 16.9 10 7.4 Women 102 75.0 24 17.6 10 7.4 Handicapped 102 77.9 19 14.5 10 7.6 The culvert be most critical to human activities this huge response on the possible impact of the rehabilitation of the culvert. Table 4.19 below shows the specific potential effect of the Maje culvert rehabilitation project. Table 4.17: Specific Effect of Maje Culvert Rehabilitation Project Variable Options Frequency Percentage The project will affected Stop them from going to school 42 30.2 School Children by: Make them go late to school 60 43.2 Can cause injury while going to 6 4.3 Make them return late from school 0 0.0 Have no effect 31 22.3 Total 139 100.0 The project will affected Disrupt their movement 83 59.7 Elderly by: Cause injury 15 10.8 Disallow relatives from visiting 7 5.0 Have no effect 34 24.5 Total 139 100.0 The project will affected Deny access to ante natal clinic 70 51.9 Pregnant Women by: Cause delivery at home 21 15.6 Cause injury 9 6.7 Have no effect 35 25.9 Total 135 100.0 The project will affected Impaired movement 75 57.7 Handicap/visually Cause injury 22 16.9 impaired by: Have no effect 33 25.4 Total 130 100.0 Respondents indicated that the rehabilitation project could stop children from going to school (30.2%) and/or make them go to school late (43.2%). They also indicated that the rehabilitation project will disrupt the movement of the elderly (59.7%), deny pregnant women access to antennal care (51.9%) and impair the movement of handicaps (57.7%). Issues raised are possible challenges that may be experienced while the Maje culvert rehabilitation project is on-going. Ultimately, the project will reduce flooding and enhance movements when completed. During flooding periods, respondents very effectively coped with flooding by adopting low living standards (85%). Respondents also indicated that staying in poor quality housing (54.7%), squatting (53.5%) and staying with neighbours/relations/friends (74.8%) was ineffective. Furthermore, the 38 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road majority 86.8% very effectively relied on chemist shops (86.8%) and herbal alternatives (32.5%) for health management. They further reported that it was not effective for children to abandon schooling (56.4%) and/or attend school irregularly (37.8%). Hence they coped very effectively by sending children to distant schools outside the community (51.9%). Again, the main sources of water are well (73.6%), bore-hole (50.5%) and rain water (56.1%). Table 4.18: Coping Strategies during Periods of Flood Effect of Very Effective Effective Not Effective Flood and culvert Collapse Coping Strategies Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage Adopt low profile living 102 85.0% 10 8.3% 8 6.7% Constrained standard access to Rely on means of neighbours/friends/relati 22 21.0% 57 54.3% 26 24.8% ons livelihood Rely on Government 10 9.6% 10 9.6% 84 80.8% relief materials Lack of access to economic Rely on menial jobs 44 41.9% 14 13.3% 47 44.8% assets Damage to Stay in poor quality 27 25.5% 21 19.8% 58 54.7% dwelling unit housing Squatting 25 25.3% 21 21.2% 53 53.5% Staying with neighbours/relations/frie 9 8.7% 17 16.5% 77 74.8% nds Constrained Rely on chemist 105 86.8% 4 3.3% 12 9.9% access to shops/drug vendors health facilities Rely on herbs /other 38 32.5% 36 30.8% 43 36.8% traditional remedies Rely on religious 3 3.2% 4 4.3% 87 92.6% homes/spiritual options Constrained to Children abandoned 33 32.7% 11 10.9% 57 56.4% access to schooling education Children sent to distant facilities schools outside the 56 51.9% 26 24.1% 26 24.1% community Irregular school 40 40.8% 21 21.4% 37 37.8% attendance by children Constrained Tanker supply/Water 6 6.1% 7 7.1% 85 86.7% access to vendor improved Well 89 73.6% 22 18.2% 10 8.3% water facility Bore-hole 52 50.5% 22 21.4% 29 28.2% Rain water 64 56.1% 14 12.3% 36 31.6% River/Stream/Spring 1 1.0% 3 3.1% 92 95.8% 4.4.10 Existing Organisations and Local Customs/Festivals in the Community The existing organizations in the community include social organizations, religious organisation, Community Development Association, Landlords/Landladies Association and Youth Forum, which participate in community development activities through construction of bridge, repair of roads/drainages, contribution of money and materials for community development, infrastructure for development (land for schools and markets), security and peace keeping. On the other hand, there are also local customs/festivals in the community such as religious festivals and community day which over the years have fostered the cohesion of the community. 39 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road 4.4.11 Gender relations According to the participants at the Focus Group Discussion session which was also corroborated during the Community Risk Assessment exercise, the existing gender relations in the community are cordial and non-discriminatory. Women also have voice in community development activities. They assist financially and they are part of traditional institutions. 4.4.12 Mitigating Measures Responses from the socio-economic survey showed that the perception of the negative impacts of the project on the socio-economic lives of the people will be minimal while the ameliorating effect of the project is a welcome development. The survey showed that the expectations from the people about the project are very high. Top on the list of the expectations is the solution to the issue of flooding and the ease of movement in the community. 40 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road CHAPTER 5 POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS Table 5.1: Significant Potential Environmental Impacts Project Phase Positive Negative Pre-Construction  Ambient Air deterioration from release of dusts and gaseous emissions  Noise and Vibration from the use of machineries and motorized equipment  Vegetation loss from land clearing and preparation activities  Fauna Habitat alteration and displacement due to site clearing  Exposure of soil to erosion and loss of quality from devegetation  Generation of vegetal wastes, other cleared materials and construction wastes  Surface water contamination as a result of sediment run off from exposed soils Construction  Propagation of  Ambient Air deterioration from release of dusts and gaseous emissions vegetal cover  Noise and Vibration from the use of machineries and motorized  Restoration of flora equipment habitat  Soil erosion from exposure of soil to rain and wind  Ecological balance  Slope instability arising from excavation in active areas and conservation  Predisposition of soil to erosion resulting from improper abandonment of  Soil stabilization borrow pit and regeneration  Water pollution due to sedimentation and siltation from runoff from spoils  Soil contamination and loss of soil quality  Generation of spoils and other construction wastes  Underground water pollution from spillages & leakages from oil storage tanks.  Increased surface water run-off due to diversion during construction. Operation/  Reduced  Reoccurrence of flooding as a result of uncontrolled solid waste disposal Maintenance vulnerability to in the stream or side drains causing blockage flooding hazards  Lesser vulnerability of people and property,  Improved disaster preparedness for adverse events;  Increased resilience of communities at risk of flooding, and the preservation of assets of households and businesses against flood risk  Improved solid waste management 41 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Table 5.2: Significant Potential Social Impacts Project Phase Positive Negative Pre-  Employment of local  Traffic congestion and increased risk of road traffic accidents Construction labour for site and injuries clearing  Risk of occupational accidents, injuries and .diseases Construction  Employment of local  Damage to existing underground public utility cables and labour for pipes and disruption of services construction and  Traffic congestion and increased risk of road traffic accidents vegetation activities and injuries  Health and safety risks associated with falls and drowning in improperly abandoned borrow pits  Risk of occupational accidents, injuries and diseases  HIV/AIDS and other STDs arising from the interactions amongst the workforce and the host community  Injuries from accidental discharge of construction materials during transportation to site  Social stress and disruptions due to lack of local labour Operation/  Reduced mortality  Occupational accidents and injuries Maintenance and morbidity from  Risk of falls from unprotected culverts water related diseases  Diversification of livelihood and increased productivity.  Reduction in public spending on replacement and rehabilitation of infrastructure  Creation of employment 42 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road CHAPTER 6 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 6.1 Mitigation Measures Cost effective measures to prevent / reduce the negative impacts or enhance the positive impacts of the activities of the proposed construction project are proffered. These include practical measures to restore impaired features after project construction; proposal of changes in schedule of associated activities; recommendation of pollution abatement procedures at all times; environmental awareness programmes for construction and operational staff; contingency plan for responding to accidental events. The mitigation measures are summarized in Table 6.1. The cost values of the mitigation / enhancement measures take into account the following among other characteristics and activities of the project: type and size of hydraulic structure, area of flow of stream/river, approach road length, length of total work area, extent of drain to be desilted and/or repaired if necessary. 6.2 Monitoring Plan The monitoring plan provides the procedures and actions that recognize and analyze environmental and social changes consequent to the pre-construction, construction and operational phases of the project. The monitoring ensures that: (a) legal standards for environmental parameters are not exceeded (b) mitigation measures are implemented in the manner described in the ESMP (c) changes to baseline environmental and social conditions during the project activities are continually monitored (d) early warning of environmental and social damage is recognized so that action may be taken, if possible, to prevent or reduce the seriousness of the unwanted impact (e) corrective actions or new adaptive management programs are implemented, as required, if proposed mitigation measures are unable to reduce and/or eliminate potential project related impacts, or meet the predetermined level of performance For effective monitoring, the following measures shall also be taken:  Monitoring shall be conducted and/or supervised by Environmental and Social Specialists, IUFMP-PIU, and other relevant personnel and MDAs;  Certified methods of measurements and sampling shall be employed;  Measuring equipment shall be accurately calibrated;  Quality control of sampling and measurements undertaken shall be ensured. The monitoring plan is summarized in Table 6.1. 43 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Table 6.1: Environmental and Social Mitigation and Monitoring Plan Potential Impacts Mitigation/Enhancement Responsibility Cost of Indicators/Parameters Method of Sampling Frequency Responsibility Cost of Measures (Implementati Mitigatio Measurement Location of (Supervision) Monitorin on) n/Enhanc Monitoring g USD ($) ement USD ($) PRE CONSTRUCTION PHASE 1. Noise and vibration from  Maintain equipment and  Contractor 400  Noise Levels (Not to  In-Situ Measurement Construction Daily Environmental the use of motorised machineries adequately to exceed 90dB(A)  Sighting Site and specialist- 100 vehicles and equipment reduce their noise levels  Records of Equipment  Complaint Register surrounding IUFMP  Fit machineries and heavy Maintenance area duty equipment with Oyo State exhaust mufflers/silencers to Ministry of minimize noise generation Environment  Avoid unnecessary idling of and Water internal combustion engines Resources  Suppress dust emissions by  Contractor 300  Suspended Particulates  In-Situ Measurement Construction Daily Environmental 300 2. Ambient air pollution from appropriate methods such as (SPM), SO2, NOx, Site and specialist- release of dusts and gaseous spraying water on soil CO, THC surrounding IUFMP emissions  Maintain vehicles in good  Vehicle Exhaust area working condition - Measurements Ministry of  Ensure exhaust fumes from  Records of Environment vehicles conform to maintenance for all  Sighting Daily and Water applicable National machineries and Resources standards and specifications - equipment 3. Vegetation loss from  Limit clearing strictly to  Contractor -  Clearly Defined  Visual Observation Construction Once during Environmental 200 preparation activities such necessary areas so as to Boundaries Site site clearing specialist- as land clearing minimize the destruction of  % of Vegetal Density and IUFMP Loss/Vegetal cover quarterly  Diversity of afterwards Oyo State indigenous plant Ministry of species Environment  No of micro habitats and Water Resources 4. Fauna habitat alteration due  Re vegetate areas likely to  Contractor 100  Diversity of  Visual Estimate of Construction Once during Environmental 100 to site clearing. be impacted with indigenous indigenous and exotic Cover Site site clearing specialist- plant species immediately plant species  Framed Quadrants and IUFMP  No of micro habitats quarterly 44 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Potential Impacts Mitigation/Enhancement Responsibility Cost of Indicators/Parameters Method of Sampling Frequency Responsibility Cost of Measures (Implementati Mitigatio Measurement Location of (Supervision) Monitorin on) n/Enhanc Monitoring g USD ($) ement USD ($) afterwards Ministry of Environment and Water Resources 5. Loss of soil quality from  Avoid removal of vegetation  Contractor 100  % of Vegetal Loss  Visual Estimate Project area Once during Environmental 100 devegetation and erosion and trees to the extent  Ratio of where site clearing specialist- possible Natural/Cultivated vegetation was and IUFMP  Protect all vegetation not Cover cleared quarterly required to be removed afterwards Oyo State against damage Ministry of  Re vegetate exposed soil Environment quickly and Water Resources  Install silt fences or other  Contractor 400  Surface Water Quality  In-Situ/Laboratory Discharge Once during Environmental 300 6. Contamination of surface similar devices at strategic (pH, TDS, TSS, BOD, Measurements point, mid- Pre- specialist- water as a result of runoff locations to prevent run-offs COD, Turbidity, THC, stream & Construction IUFMP from exposed soils and of sediment/silt to surface Heavy Metals) downstream construction spoils water Oyo State  Define flood plain Ministry of boundaries and pollutants of Environment concern, and conduct and Water resource inventory and Resources information analysis.  Identify sensitive areas in order to protect surface water and prevent non-point source pollution.  Develop a Waste  Contractor 800  Contractors  Visual Observation Construction Environmental 7. Generation of spoils and Management Plan (WMP) Compliance to WMP Site specialist- other construction wastes  Promote waste avoidance; IUFMP reduction; reuse and  Contractor  Waste Tracking Report recycling as applicable  Waste Handling and Oyo State  Ensure proper handling, Disposal Weekly Ministry of and disposal of wastes 400 Environment (especially contaminated and Water soil, concrete, oils, grease, Resources 300 lubricants, metals, etc.) Oyo State 45 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Potential Impacts Mitigation/Enhancement Responsibility Cost of Indicators/Parameters Method of Sampling Frequency Responsibility Cost of Measures (Implementati Mitigatio Measurement Location of (Supervision) Monitorin on) n/Enhanc Monitoring g USD ($) ement USD ($) Solid Waste Management Authority 8. Risk of road traffic  Develop a site specific HSE  Contractor 900  Contractors  Routine Inspection Construction During Pre- Environmental - accidents and injuries plan Compliance Site Construction specialist- owing to dangerous culvert  Workers Using PPE IUFMP; and road conditions and  HSE Statistics (FAC,  HSE Reports Federal Road road diversion LTI, etc) Safety 8. Commission and Oyo State Traffic Management Agency 9. Occupational and social  Develop a site specific HSE  Contractor -  Contractors  Routine Inspection Construction Once during Social - hazards owing to plan Compliance Site Pre- Development inadequate road  Workers Using PPE Construction Specialist- infrastructure  HSE Statistics (FAC,  HSE Reports IUFMP LTI, etc) Oyo State Ministry of Environment and Water Resources 10. Risk of environmental  Develop a site specific HSE  Contractor -  Contractors  Routine Inspection Construction Once during Social - diseases arising from plan Compliance Site Pre- Development indiscriminate waste  Workers Using PPE Construction Specialist- disposal  HSE Statistics (FAC,  HSE Reports IUFMP LTI, etc) Oyo State Ministry of Environment and Water Resources Oyo State Ministry of Health 11. Employment of local • Maximize employment of  Contractor -  No. of local labour  Log book Construction Once during IUFMP- 200 46 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Potential Impacts Mitigation/Enhancement Responsibility Cost of Indicators/Parameters Method of Sampling Frequency Responsibility Cost of Measures (Implementati Mitigatio Measurement Location of (Supervision) Monitorin on) n/Enhanc Monitoring g USD ($) ement USD ($) labour for site clearing local labour by ensuring the used Site Pre- Social submission of statement of Construction Development intent to employ local labour Specialist as a condition in the procurement document for the contractor. SUB TOTAL 3,400.00 1,600.00 CONSTRUCTION PHASE 1. Noise and vibration from  Maintain equipment and  Contractor 500  Noise Levels (Not to  In-Situ Measurement Construction Daily Environmental 200 the use of motorised machineries adequately to exceed 90dB(A)  Sighting Site and specialist- vehicles and equipment reduce their noise levels  No of Complaints  Complaint Register Surrondingarea IUFMP  Fit machineries and  Records of Equipment motorized equipment with Maintenance Ministry of exhaust mufflers/silencers to Environment minimize noise generation and Water  Avoid unnecessary idling of Resources internal combustion engines 2. Ambient air pollution from  Suppress dust emissions by  Contractor 400  Suspended Particulates  In-Situ Measurement Construction Daily Environmental 300 release of dusts and appropriate methods such as (TSP, PM10, or Site and specialist- gaseous emissions spraying water on soil smaller), SO2, NOx, surrounding IUFMP  Maintain vehicles in good CO, THC area working condition -  Vehicle Exhaust  Ensure exhaust fumes from Measurements Ministry of vehicles conform to  Records of  Sighting Daily Environment applicable National maintenance for all and Water standards and specifications - machineries and Resources equipment 3. Fauna habitat  Avoid removal of vegetation  Contractor 600  % of Vegetal Loss  Visual Estimate/ Excavated Once during Environmental 200 displacement due to and trees to an extent  Compliance with Observation Area project specialist- construction activities possible Design Specification activity and IUFMP  Protect all vegetation not  Ratio quarterly required to be removed Natural/Cultivated afterwards Oyo State against damage Cover Ministry of  Apply best engineering  Evidence of drainage Environment practices to minimize soil channels,etc and Water Resources 47 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Potential Impacts Mitigation/Enhancement Responsibility Cost of Indicators/Parameters Method of Sampling Frequency Responsibility Cost of Measures (Implementati Mitigatio Measurement Location of (Supervision) Monitorin on) n/Enhanc Monitoring g USD ($) ement USD ($) structure damage and adhere strictly to design specifications  Work on exposed areas and re vegetate quickly 4. Soil erosion from  Nurture vegetation and  Contractor 700  No of indigenous  Routine Inspection Construction At Environmental 200 exposure of soil to prevent deforestation trees planted Site completion specialist- weather elements activities of civil IUFMP  Use vegetal waste as works compost to aid rapid vegetal Ministry of propagation Environment and Water Resources 5. Predisposition of soil to  Implement Site Reclamation  Contractor -  Site Reclamation Plan  Sighting At the worksite Once during Environmental 200 erosion resulting from Plan to ensure that site is  Contractor’s and material construction specialist- improper abandonment of rehabilitated and restored to Compliance  Visual Observation borrow area IUFMP borrow pit a safe and stable state Ministry of Environment and Water Resources 6. Contamination of surface  Construct temporary  Contractor 750  Surface Water Quality  In-Situ/ Laboratory Discharge Monthly Environmental 500 water as a result of runoff drainage channels with (pH, TDS, TSS, BOD, Measurements point, mid- specialist- from exposed soils and sedimentation traps and/or COD, Turbidity, THC, stream and IUFMP construction spoils screens heavy metals) downstream  Install sediment silt fences  Visual Observation Ministry of or other similar devices at Environment strategic locations to prevent and Water run-offs of sediment/silt to Resources surface water 7. Generation of spoils and  Implement the Waste  Contractor -  Contractors  Visual Observation Construction Weekly Environmental other construction wastes Management Plan (WMP) Compliance Site specialist- 200  Promote avoidance; IUFMP reduction; reuse and recycling;  Waste Handling, and  Waste Tracking Report Ministry of  Enhance proper handling Disposal Environment and disposal of wastes 700 and Water 48 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Potential Impacts Mitigation/Enhancement Responsibility Cost of Indicators/Parameters Method of Sampling Frequency Responsibility Cost of Measures (Implementati Mitigatio Measurement Location of (Supervision) Monitorin on) n/Enhanc Monitoring g USD ($) ement USD ($) (especially contaminated Resources soil or water, concrete, demolition materials, oils, Oyo State grease, lubricants, metals, Solid Waste etc.)  Implement SHM Sub- Management  Develop Spoil Handling Plan Authority Management (SHM) Sub- Plan 8. Increased surface water  Construct temporary  Contractor 600  Surface Water Quality  In-Situ Measurements Discharge During Environmental 400 run-off due to diversion drainage channels with (pH, TDS, TSS, BOD, point, mid- construction specialist- during construction. sedimentation traps and/or COD, Turbidity) stream and IUFMP screens  Visual Observation downstream Ministry of Environment and Water Resources 9. River banks are disturbed  Rebuild using either earth  Contractor 950  Reliability of civil  Visual observation Construction During Oyo State 300 by construction activities embankment or revetment works  Instrument Site construction Ministry of with stone pitching as found measurement Works and appropriate Transport 10. Damage to and  Employ utility survey maps  Contractor 400  Notify Utility Service  Notification Register Construction During Engineer- 200 disruption of services of to identify existing Providers  Visual Observation Site (excavated excavation IUFMP existing underground public underground facilities areas) utility cables and pipes before excavation works to Oyo State prevent / minimize damages Ministry of and disruption of services Works  Shut down service if necessary should be as temporal as possible 11. Traffic congestion and  Implement site specific HSE  Contractor -  Contractors  Routine Inspection Priority Site During Social 200 increased risk of road traffic plan Compliance Construction Development accidents and injuries  Workers Using PPE Specialist-  HSE Statistics (FAC,  HSE Reports IUFMP; LTI, etc) Federal Road Safety Commission 49 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Potential Impacts Mitigation/Enhancement Responsibility Cost of Indicators/Parameters Method of Sampling Frequency Responsibility Cost of Measures (Implementati Mitigatio Measurement Location of (Supervision) Monitorin on) n/Enhanc Monitoring g USD ($) ement USD ($) and Oyo State Traffic Management Agency 12. Safety risks associated  Implement site specific HSE  Contractor -  Contractors  Routine Inspection Priority Site During Social 200 with falls in improperly plan Compliance Construction Development abandoned borrow pits  Workers Using PPE Specialist-  HSE Statistics (FAC,  HSE Reports IUFMP LTI, etc) Ministry of Environment and Water Resources 13. Social diseases arising  Implement site specific HSE  Contractor -  Contractors  Routine Inspection Priority Site During Social 300 from interactions amongst the plan Compliance Construction Development workforce and the host  Workers Using PPE Specialist- community  HSE Statistics (FAC,  HSE Reports IUFMP LTI, etc) Ministry of Environment and Water Resources Oyo State Ministry of Health 14. Occupational and social Implement site specific HSE  Contractor -  Contractors  Routine Inspection Priority Site During Social 200 stress and disruptions due to plan Compliance Construction Development inability to cross the stream /  Workers Using PPE Specialist- river  HSE Statistics (FAC,  HSE Reports IUFMP LTI, etc) Ministry of Environment and Water Resources 13. Employment of local • Maximize employment of  Contractor -  No of local labour used  Log book Construction During IUFMP- 200 50 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Potential Impacts Mitigation/Enhancement Responsibility Cost of Indicators/Parameters Method of Sampling Frequency Responsibility Cost of Measures (Implementati Mitigatio Measurement Location of (Supervision) Monitorin on) n/Enhanc Monitoring g USD ($) ement USD ($) labour for construction local labour by ensuring the Site Construction Social activities submission of statement of Development intent to employ local labour Specialist as a condition in the procurement document for the contractor. 14. Local sale of food and  Implement site specific HSE  Contractor -  Contractors  Routine Inspection Project Site During Social 200 other items to workers on the plan Compliance Construction Development site  Workers Using PPE Specialist-  HSE Statistics (FAC,  HSE Reports IUFMP LTI, etc) Ministry of Environment and Water Resources Ministry of Health SUB TOTAL 5,600.00 4,000.00 POST- CONSTRUCTION / OPERATION / MAINTENANCE 1. Reoccurrence of  Desilting of stream channel  Contractor 800  Visual Observation Project Site Environment- 500 flooding as a result of  Enlighten the populace on  Waste Handling, and Sighting IUFMP the predisposition of proper disposal of domestic Disposal people to solid waste waste Weekly Ministry of disposal in the stream or  Enhance proper handling and  Contractors  Routine Inspection Environment side drains, thereby disposal of wastes (especially  Contractor Compliance and Water causing blockage to flow contaminated soil or water, 500  Waste Tracking Report Resources of water. concrete, demolition materials, oils, grease,  Workers using PPE lubricants, metals, etc.) 2. Improved and safer  Inspect and certify the Contractor 700  Tensile strength of  Instrumentation Culvert Annually Oyo State 700 culvert structural attributes of the structure measurement Ministry of culvert/bridge  Visual observation Works 3. Improved approach road  Inspect and certify the Contractor 500  Reliability of  Visual observation Area around Annually Oyo State 700 and drains structural attributes of the infrastructure culvert Ministry of culvert/bridge  Instrumentation Works and measurement Transport 51 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Potential Impacts Mitigation/Enhancement Responsibility Cost of Indicators/Parameters Method of Sampling Frequency Responsibility Cost of Measures (Implementati Mitigatio Measurement Location of (Supervision) Monitorin on) n/Enhanc Monitoring g USD ($) ement USD ($) 4. Propagation and • Re-vegetate with indigenous  Contractor 600  Diversity of  Visual Estimate of Site area Annually Environment- 200 restoration of vegetation plant species indigenous and exotic Cover IUFMP plant species  Framed Quadrants  No of micro habitats Ministry of Environment and Water Resources 5. Restoration of flora and • Re-vegetate with indigenous  Contractor 600  Diversity of  Visual Estimate of Site area Annually Environment- 200 Fauna habitat plant species indigenous and exotic Cover IUFMP plant species  Framed Quadrants  No of micro habitats Ministry of • Fence off vegetation area to  Contractor 900  Visual Observation Environment reduce human disturbance  Reliability of Site area Annually and Water infrastructure Resources Ministry of 200 Works 6. Soil stabilization and • Inspect and certify civil  Contractor 400  Reliability of civil  Instrumentation Site area Annually Ministry of 300 restoration works works measurement Works and Transportation 7. Improved solid waste  Implement the Waste  Contractor -  Contractors  Visual Observation Site area Environment- management Management Plan (WMP) Compliance to WMP IUFMP  Promote waste avoidance;  Contractor reduction; reuse and  Waste Tracking Report Environment recycling as applicable  Waste Handling and Weekly Ministry  Ensure proper handling,  Contractor Disposal 300 and disposal of the various 400 Oyo State types of solid municipal and Solid Waste household wastes Management  Visual observation Authority  Contractor  Fence off river/stream banks - Reliability of facility Site area Annually Ministry of - around culvert Works and Transportation 8. Contamination of  Implement the Waste  Contractor -  Surface Water Quality  In-Situ / Laboratory Discharge Monthly Environmental 300 surface water as a result Management Plan (WMP) (pH, TDS, TSS, BOD, Measurements point, mid- specialist- of waste dumping in and  Promote waste avoidance;  Contractor COD, Turbidity, THC, stream & IUFMP around the stream/river reduction; reuse and Heavy Metals) downstream 52 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Potential Impacts Mitigation/Enhancement Responsibility Cost of Indicators/Parameters Method of Sampling Frequency Responsibility Cost of Measures (Implementati Mitigatio Measurement Location of (Supervision) Monitorin on) n/Enhanc Monitoring g USD ($) ement USD ($) recycling as applicable Oyo State  Ensure proper handling,  Contractor Ministry of and disposal of the various - Environment types of solid municipal and and Water household wastes Resources  Fence off river/stream banks  Contractor around culvert Ministry of - Works 9. Risks of occupational  Implement the site specific  Contractor -  HSE Statistics (FAC,  Routine Inspection Culvert and Monthly Social 100 and social accidents and HSE plan LTI, etc) area specialist- injuries in using the new IUFMP culvert  HSE Reports Ministry of Environment and Water Resources 10. Risk of falls from  Build concrete or steel  Contractor 1300  Reliability of  Instrument Culvert and Biannually Social 300 unprotected culvert barriers at sides of bridge by infrastructure measurement area specialist- the river and immediate  Visual inspection IUFMP approach to culvert Ministry of Works and Transport 11. Improved social and  Develop Community Affairs  Contractor 500  Social indices and  Routine Interaction Project area Annually Social 200 occupational interaction Policy/Plan and Implement statistics Development and welfare arising from Specialist- improved road  Social Reports IUFMP infrastructure Ministry of Social Welfare 12. Reduced risk of flooding  Assess all infrastructure at  Contractor 400  Reliability /  Visual observation Infrastructure Annually IUFMP 300 and its consequent site with regards to risk of Appropriateness of at site injuries to life and flooding infrastructure  Review of documents Ministry of property on infrastructure Works 13. Improved opportunities  Implement Community  Contractor -  No. of new jobs and  Routine Interaction Project area Annually Social 200 for creation of Affairs Policy/Plan business Development employment, Specialist- 53 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River Culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Potential Impacts Mitigation/Enhancement Responsibility Cost of Indicators/Parameters Method of Sampling Frequency Responsibility Cost of Measures (Implementati Mitigatio Measurement Location of (Supervision) Monitorin on) n/Enhanc Monitoring g USD ($) ement USD ($) diversification of  Social Reports IUFMP livelihood and increased productivity. Ministry of Social Welfare 14. Reduction in public  Inspect and maintain  Contractor 300  Reliability of  Visual observation Culvert and Annually Oyo State 500 spending on replacement infrastructure infrastructure approach road Ministry of and rehabilitation of road  Instrumentation and drains Works and infrastructure measurement Transport 15. Reduced mortality and  Implement specific HSE  Contractor -  HSE Statistics (FAC,  Routine Inspection Project area Annually Social 300 morbidity from water plan LTI, etc) Development related diseases Specialist-  HSE Reports IUFMP Ministry of Environment and Water Resources Ministry of Health SUB TOTAL 7,900.00 5,300.00 GRAND TOTAL 16,900.00 10,900.00 54 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road 6.3 Institutional Arrangement The successful implementation of this ESMP depends on the commitment and capacity of various institutions and stakeholders to implement the ESMP effectively. Thus, the arrangement as well as the roles and responsibilities of the institutions and persons that will be involved in the implementation, monitoring and review of the ESMP are discussed below. The roles and responsibilities of the various institutions in the implementation of this ESMP are outlined in Table 6.2 Table 6.2: Institutional Safeguards Responsibilities Category Roles & Responsibilities Ibadan Urban Flood  Management, implementation, monitoring and compliance of the ESMP, and any approval Management Project- conditions, including construction supervision and performance of all Project staff, contractors Project Implementing and subcontractors Unit (IUFMP-PIU)  Review of ESMP performance and implementation of correction actions  Stop work procedures, in the event of breaches of ESMP conditions that may lead to serious impacts on local communities, or affect the reputation of the Project  Ensure effective communication and dissemination of the content and requirements of the ESMP to contractors and subcontractors  Assisting the contractor with implementation of ESMP sub-plans  Monitoring of ESMP performance  Ensuring compliance to all Project social commitments, including implementation of the social management plans  Report environmental performance of the Project directly to Oyo State Ministry of Environment and Water Resources  Prepare environmental reports summarizing Project activities, as required, Representing the Project at community meetings  Ensuring effective community liaison and fulfilling commitments to facilitate public consultation throughout the Project cycle  Liaise with other relevant State Government MDAs, Federal Government MDAs, CBOs and NGOs for effective implementation of the ESMP Environmental and  Review all ESIAs/ESMPs documents prepared by environmental and social consultants and Social Safeguard ensure adequacy under the World Bank Safeguard policies. Unit -IUFMP  Ensure that the project design and specifications adequately reflect the recommendations of the ESIAs/ ESMPs;  Co-ordinate application, follow up processing and obtain requisite clearances required for the project, if required;  Prepare compliance reports with statutory requirements;  Develop, organize and deliver training program for the PIU staff, the contractors and others involved in the project implementation, in collaboration with the PIU;  Review and approve the Contractor’s Implementation Plan for the environmental measures, as per the ESIA and any other supplementary environmental and social studies that may need to be carried out by the PIU;  Liaise with the Contractors and the PIU / MDAs on implementation of the ESMPs;  Liaise with various Central and State Government agencies on environmental, resettlement and other regulatory matters;  Continuously interact with the NGOs and community groups that would be involved in the project  Establish dialogue with the affected communities and ensure that the environmental and social concerns and suggestions are incorporated and implemented in the project;  Review the performance of the project through an assessment of the periodic environmental and social monitoring reports; provide a summary of the same to the Project Manager, and initiate necessary follow-up actions; 55 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Category Roles & Responsibilities  Provide support and assistance to the State Government Agencies and the World Bank to supervise the implementation. Ministry of  Overall responsibility for environmental performance of PROJECT Environment and  Decision-maker on applicable policies to the PROJECT Water Resources  Oversight supervisory role during the construction phase  Overall responsibility for ESMP implementation during the operation phase  Review reports of the Independent Environmental Monitoring Consultant  Approves changes to the ESMP, as necessary, as part of an adaptive approach to environmental and social management of the PROJECT  Responsible for working with stakeholders in developing a Flood Management Approach Construction  Preparation and implementation of the Construction and Worker Camp Management Plan Contractor  Prepare and maintain records and all required reporting data as stipulated by the ESMP, for submission to the Supervising Engineer Consultant  Ensure that all construction personnel and subcontractors are informed of the intent of the ESMP and are made aware of the required measures for environmental and social compliance and performance  During construction, maintain traffic safety along access roads, with special emphasis on high trafficked areas Supervising Engineer  Preparation and implementation of the Environmental Supervision Plan during construction  Preparation and implementation of the Environmental Monitoring Plan during construction  Supervision of contractor performance of implementation of the Construction and Work Camp Management Plan  Reporting any incidents or non-compliance with the ESMP to the IUFMP  Ensuring adequate training and education of all staff involved in environmental supervision  Making recommendations to the IUFMP regarding ESMP performance as part of an overall commitment to continuous improvement Federal Ministry of  Lead roles in the provision of advice on screening, scoping, review of draft ESMP report (in Environment/EIA liaison with State Ministry of Environment), receiving comments from stakeholders, public Department and hearing of the project proposals, and convening a technical decision-making panel, Project NESREA categorization for EA, Applicable standards, Environmental and social liability investigations, Monitoring and evaluation process and criteria Other relevant State  Other MDAs come in as and when relevant areas or resources under their jurisdiction or Government MDAs management are likely to be affected by or implicated projects.  They participate in the EA processes and in project decision-making that helps prevent or minimize environmental and social impacts and to mitigate them. These institutions may also be required, issue a consent or approval for an aspect of a project; allow an area to be included in a project; or allow impact to a certain extent or impose restrictions or conditions, monitoring responsibility or supervisory oversight World Bank  Overall supervision and provision of technical support and guidance.  Recommend additional measures for strengthening the management framework and implementation performance;  Supervising the application and recommendations of sub- project ESMPs. Local Government  Provide oversight function across subproject in LGAs for ESMP compliance  Liaising with the PIU. Engage and encourage carrying out comprehensive and practical awareness campaign for the proposed sub-projects, amongst the various relevant grass roots interest groups Local Community;  Promote environmental awareness Community  Assist and Liaise with other stakeholders to ensure proper siting and provision of approval for Development such sites Association (CDA)  Support with provision of necessary infrastructures and engage/ encourage carrying out comprehensive and practical awareness campaign for the proposed projects, amongst the various relevant grass roots interest groups.  Ensure Community participation by mobilizing, sensitizing community members Non-Governmental  Assist in their respective ways to ensure effective response actions 56 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Category Roles & Responsibilities Organisations  Conducting scientific researches alongside government groups to evolve and devise sustainable (NGOs) environmental strategies and rehabilitation techniques  Organizing, coordinating and ensuring safe use of volunteers in a response action, and actually identifying where these volunteers can best render services effectively  Providing wide support assistance helpful in management planning, institutional / governance issues and other livelihood related matter, project impacts and mitigation measure, and awareness campaigns Others/General  Identify environmental and social issues that could derail the project and support project impacts Public and mitigation measures  Assist in awareness campaigns 6.4 Training and Capacity Building/Strengthening Plan In order to ensure that the ESMP provisions are implemented efficiently and effectively, training and capacity building and strengthening are required. Therefore, based on the assessment of the institutional capacities of the different agencies that will be involved in the implementation of the ESMP, the following broad areas of capacity building/strengthening have been identified and recommended for the PIU and other relevant agencies for effective implementation of the ESMP.  Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP);  Environmental and Social Monitoring and Audit;  Environmental and Social Reporting;  Construction Health Safety and Environment;  Solid Waste Management;  Disaster Risk Reduction/Management. The type of trainings proposed to be organized during the project period and estimated cost is given in Table 6.3. The cost estimates are based on the assumption that the training program will be held in Ibadan Oyo State; some of the resource persons could come from other parts of the country and therefore require travel allowances; participants will come from MDAs and other institutions at state levels. 57 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Table 6.3: Proposed Training Programme for the Implementation of the ESMP Type of When Training to Capacity Building Estimated Proposed Topics Target Audience Duration Training be conducted Activity Budget ($) by who Module 1:  Overview of Environmental and Relevant staff of Oyo State 2 days Lecture Pre- Environmenta 6000 Training on Social Impact Assessment Process Ministry of Environment and Constr l Consultant Environmental and Social  Overview of Potential Environmental Water Resources FMEnv (EA) uction Management Plan and Social Impacts of Project Officers of PIU-Environmental Implementation  Environmental Pollution & Control Specialist/Social Development  Environmental Engineering Specialist  Environmental and Social Oyo State Waste Management Management Plan Board and other relevant MDAs  Environmental Performance LGA departments, NGOs, Monitoring – Monitoring Mitigation CBOs., Contractor Measures in ESMP  Environmental and Social Audits  Environmental Reporting Module 2:  Introduction to Construction HSE Relevant staff of Oyo State 1½ days Lecture Pre- Engineering 5000 Training on Construction  Overview of Health and Safety Ministry of Environment and Constr Consultant HSE Hazards in Construction Water Resources, FMEnv (EA) uction  Incidents: Causation, Investigation & Officers of PIU-Environmental Reporting Specialist/Social Development  Excavation Safety Specialist, and other relevant  Construction Site Inspection MDAs LGA departments,  Personal Protective Equipment NGOs, CBOs, Contractor Module 3:  DRR/DRM concepts and applications Relevant staff of Oyo State ½days Lecture Pre- Environmenta 2000 Training on Disaster Risk Ministry of Environment and Constr l Consultant Reduction/Management Water Resources uction FMEnv (EA), OYSEMA Officers of PIU-Environmental Specialist/Social Development Specialist, and other relevant MDAs LGA departments, NGOs, CBOs. TOTAL 4 days $13,000 58 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road 6.5 Implementation Schedule The elements of the implementation schedule presented in Table 6.4 have to be observed throughout the project activities Table 6.4: ESMP Implementation Schedule S/N Activity Responsibility Pre- Construction Operation Constructi (Month) & on (Month) Maintenanc e Environmental & Social Management 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 Formal Disclosure of ESMP PIU 2 Develop Environmental/Social PIU-Environmental / Requirements in Bid Documents Social Development 3 Allocate Budget for ESMP and PIU Appoint Support Staff for ESMP 4 Finalization and Approval of Engineering Engineering Designs Consultant / PIU- Engineering 5 Review and Approval of PIU-Environmental / Contractor’s HSE, WMP, SRP, Social Development / SHM sub-plan Engineering 6 Implementation of Environmental Contractor and Social Mitigation Measures 7 Supervision of pre-Construction PIU-Engineering and Construction activities 8 Supervision of ESMP PIU-Environmental / Implementation Social / Engineering 9 Environmental and Social PIU/ Ministry of Monitoring and Auditing Environment & Water Resources/Consultant 10 Reporting on ESMP PIU/Relevant MDAs Implementation 11 Environmental and Social Environmental and Development Training Social Consultant 6.6 Proposed Budget for ESMP Implementation The total cost for implementing the ESMP is estimated at Forty-four Thousand Eight Hundred and Eighty Dollars only (US$ 44,880.00) which is Seventeen Million, Nine Hundred and Fifty-two Thousand Naira only (N 17,952,000.00). The table 6.5 below shows the breakdown of the responsibility and the cost for implementing the ESMP. 59 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Table 6.5: Estimated Budget for the Implementation of ESMP Cost Estimate Cost Estimate Item Responsibility In Nigerian Naira (N) In US Dollars (US$) Mitigation PIU, Civil Engineering Contractor, 16,900.00 6,760,000.00 Engineering Consultant, Environmental Consultant Monitoring PIU, Oyo State Ministry of 10,900.00 4,360,000.00 Environment and Water Resources, Waste Management Board, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Works & Transport, Environmental Consultant Capacity PIU, Oyo State Ministry of 13,000.00 5,200,000.00 Building Environment and Water Resources/Other relevant MDAs Sub-Total 40,800.00 16,320,000.00 Contingency 10% of Sub-Total 4,080.00 1,632,000.00 Total 44,880.00 17,952,000.00 Currency Unit = Nigerian Naira US$ = N400 6.7 Reporting Reports shall be produced through the course of implementation of monitoring programs, collecting incident/grievances forms, consulting with local community and auditing performance of existing programmes/mitigation measures within the ESMP. Table 6.6 describes the types of reports that shall be produced. The PIU should provide the World Bank with report updates, frequency of reporting to the World Bank will vary depending on the nature of the non-compliance and monitoring schedule. Table 6.6: Types of reports Responsibility Type of Report Purpose/Details of Reporting Frequency Submit to: of Submission Accidents/Incident Filing/notification of accidents Within 24 hours PIU Report or unplanned events of the incident Non-compliance Detail the cause, nature and Within one PIU Report effect of any environmental week of the and/or socio-economic event non-compliant act Contractor performed Monthly Report of Monthly PIU Compliance Report compliance and non- compliance issues / measures Daily Compliance Checklist of environmental Daily Internal/PIU Checklist and social compliance of PIU- construction Environmental Monthly Monthly report of compliance Monthly Internal/PIU /Social Compliance Report within 10 days of receipt of Development report from Contractor 60 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road 6.8 ESMP Disclosures Disclosures, as described in Table 6.7, shall be made after the ESMP review and clearance by the World Bank. Table 6.7: Disclosure procedure Action Remarks 1. Disclosure on 2 state newspapers The PIU will disclose the ESMP as required by the Nigeria EIA public notice and review procedures 2. Disclosure on 2 local The PIU will disclose the ESMP as required by the Nigeria EIA newspapers public notice and review procedures 3. Disclosure at the Oyo State The PIU will disclose the ESMP as required by the Nigeria EIA Ministry of Environment and public notice and review procedures Water Resources 4. Disclosure at the IUFMP office The PIU will disclose the ESMP as required by the Nigeria EIA public notice and review procedures 5. Disclosure at the Local The purpose will be to inform stakeholders about the project Government Office & the host activities; environmental and social impacts anticipated and community proposed environmental and social mitigation measures. 6. Disclosure at the World Bank The ESMP will be disclosed according to the World Bank Info Shop Disclosure Policy- OP/BP 17.50 7. Disclosure at the FMEnv Zonal The PIU will disclose the ESMP as required by the Nigeria EIA Office in Ibadan public notice and review procedures 61 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road CHAPTER 7 PUBLIC / STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTATIONS 7.1 Stakeholders’ Meeting Procedure Public consultation has proven to be vital in project conception and implementation. It allows people own the projects and enhances project survival and trust between government and beneficiary community. For this project, we engaged critical stakeholders for the overall success of the project. In order to achieve this, the following procedure was undertaken while engaging the communities. 1. Pre-consultation: Initial visitation to the communities ensured familiarities with the Consultant team. During these pre-public consultation meetings, we contacted and engaged representatives of key community actors including executives of landlord associations, community associations, religious organizations, and non-government organizations such as the Red Cross, transporters associations (Okada Riders Association and National Union of Road Transport Workers), community/opinion leaders, people living with disability, women groups and youth groups. These initial meetings were used to prepare the mind of the community ahead of the forum meeting. Key critical stakeholders are vital in building trust and entering the field for public communication and consultations. 2. Development of Communication plan: The development of a communication plan for this study was influenced greatly by the pre-consultation meetings. This was important as communication strategies must take into consideration the peculiar characteristics of the audiences. Taking cognizance of the peculiar characteristics of our stakeholders, Yoruba was the main language of communication while English was sparingly used. The use of Yoruba helped us in building more trust as stakeholders were able to relate with what we presented and made valid contributions. 3. Discussion with Stakeholders: Further to the above, one-on-one and community meetings, telephone conversations and group discussions were employed in engaging stakeholders. These different strategies enabled us to get more data useful for the execution of the project. Where group discussion took place, we ensured moderation in order to control for dominance. The Consultant socioeconomic team utilized both qualitative and quantitative methods (In-depth interviews, administration of questionnaire as well as key informant interviews). The project site was visited by the Consultant team, the IUFMP Social Development Specialist and the Engineer, and the relevant MDAs and Local Government representatives. The community forum had women group, representatives of the physically challenged, schools, market men and women, transport unions, social groups, NGOs (Red Cross society), landlord associations, and traditional institutions, among others. This collectivity made the meeting generate diverse issues and robust information as it relates to the socio-economic impacts flooding has on their lives and how the proposed project will affect their livelihoods. Issues raised and Conclusions The public consultation indicated that the socio-economic livelihoods of the communities are negatively affected by flooding. The following are some of the conclusions and issues raised: 62 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road 1. There was harmony of purpose by the community members at the forum, and everyone who contributed to the discussion spoke as for the entire community. 2. Due to years of unfulfilled promises of construction of affected culvert/bridge, there was trust problem across communities. Hence there is need to build trust across project sites. 3. There was harmony of purpose by the community members at the forum, and everyone who contributed to the discussion spoke as for the entire community. 4. Communities had utilized self-galvanized efforts in reducing adverse impacts of the sites on their livelihoods through periodic contributions. 5. Corruption was identified as responsible of previously poorly constructed culvert/bridges which were not durable. Hence, stakeholders do not want quality of the projects compromised. 6. Communities demand right to grievance and petitions. 7. There was demand for provision of formal garbage and sewage disposal sites to stop dumping of waste in rivers. 8. Communities demand for alternative routes during construction of the new bridge/road infrastructure. It is expected that the issues raised by stakeholders will be taken into consideration during the implementation of this project. Issues of trust, corruption and poor communication from government to the beneficiary of projects need to be addressed. Trust can be built when communities see execution of projects within the timeframe stipulated and when they are involved in the conception, planning and execution. This is essential for projection development and implementation and gives the feeling of ownership of projects to community. It also has implication for security. This bottom-up approach is suggested. It is expected that the results of the socio-economic impact assessment be communicated to the community through a process of debriefing on results of the study. This will allow the communities to make final input before full project implementation. The summary of the proceedings of the consultation is provided in Table 7.1. Table 7.1: Summary of Proceedings of Consultations Items Description Date of Public consultation 20 June 2016 Name of Stakeholders (community) Maje Faku Idi-Mango Community. Key Stakeholders The Baale (traditional community head); council of chiefs, representatives of media houses (Fresh FM 105.9fm and The Nigerian Tribune); representative of religious groups; market men and women; artisans; Community leaders; Landlord association; Opinion groups; IUFMP; relevant State Government officials; Consultant team: experts, research assistants and enumerators. Attendance 33 (visiting teams exclusive) Language of communication Yoruba (mainly)/English Introduction The welcoming speech was given by the president of the community, an engineer. He said the community had gone a long way and tried all their possible best to do a lot of interventions/palliatives in the community and appreciated the government for the help they are planning to render to the community. 63 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road The Consultant team leader gave the general overview of the proposed project after introducing the consultant team. He stressed the importance of community consultation for the smooth implementation of the project. He noted that the meeting was for socio-economic impact assessment of the proposed project and how the project would affect individuals and the community as a whole. He pleaded for cooperation of the communities for successful take-off and execution of the project for the development of the community. He also implored them to attend to the research enumerators who are administering questionnaire as part of the assessment. The project engineer gave a historical review of the flood crises that occurred in August 26, 2011 in Ibadan during which a lot of lives and properties were lost, thus the assistance by the state government sought from the World Bank. The PIU social safeguard specialist hinted the forum that a committee would be formed called Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) to settle any conflict that may arise during the course of the project. The Baale of the community thanked the government, all government officials and the consultation team. He assured of full cooperation, security of project workers and equipment, and peace in the community. He said they would provide all necessary contacts for the team in case any issue or conflicts comes up. He mentioned that there was a flood crisis that led to the death of three people recently, therefore no one would want to hinder the project that is for the progress and development of the community. He cursed anyone that would act or ever think of looking for a way to disrupt the development. He went further to present the president of Soka-Alabameji the face and contact person of the community to the project team. He mentioned some of the good deeds the contact person had done for the community, including palliative culvert done solely by him, prompt conflict resolution and good coordination of the entire community. He pleaded the project to reconstruct the road from Soka to Alabameji. He finalized by saying he knows the president would help the project team on security and protection of workers and equipment. Issues/Comments Raised by the stakeholders Response by the Project Officers / Consultant  A member from Maje asked if the youths in the The project engineer responded that decisions on community will be favoured by being subcontracting lie in the hand of the contractor as the employed to work/participate in the project contractor is supposed to have all necessary materials and work to earn some money. equipment needed for the job. But he can assure that one way or the other, there would always be Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Local labour shall be favoured as much as possible.  An opinion leader from Maje-Itesiwaju estate On the request for construction of other bridges, the PIU asked if he could have the opportunity of being engineer advised that letters should be written to the Ibadan contracted to supply necessary building Urban Flood Management office for consideration. He materials since that is his work. reiterated that the current site is one of the priority sites, and that the bridge would be constructed to the best quality.  The Baale of Faruku community sought to The engineer replied that the start of the construction depends know if the project will be extended to the on the feasibility studies and material testing which must be construction of other bridges aside from the according to the World Bank’s specifications. However, the Maje-Soka Bridge. state government had urged the process to be hastened up.  The Iyalode (women leader) of the community He said alternative route would be constructed for the pleaded for the bridge to be lifted high when it duration of the project and that some approach roads would is being constructed. be rehabilitated to some extent and with further collaboration and cooperation with the Local Government Area, others  The Iyalode also asked when the project is shall also be rehabilitated. starting because there have been so many promises which never came to reality. She also 64 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road requested for alternative route, extension of the bridge by making reference to St. Louis Bridge in Molete, and consideration for women involvement in the proposed project. 7.2 Community Risk Assessment Table 7.2: Hazards in the community Hazards Ranking* Bad bridges/flood (Maje channelisation) 1st Bad roads/drainages 2nd Lack of pedestrian bridge 3rd Lack of public schools 4th Inadequate of medical facilities 5th Security (lack of police station) 6th Electricity (damage to electric poles, cables and gross shortage of electricity) 7th Lack of modern markets 8th *These rankings were arrived at after the participants were asked to indicate the problems according to the severity of their impacts on the community Table 7.3: Risk Analysis Those at risk (ranked) Why they are at risk Children 1. Children are carried away by flood due to ignorance 2. Children are cut off during rainfall 3. Children are prevented from going to school Women 1. Women are cut off during rainfall 2. Rancour in the family/family disputes 3. Women are often restless during rainfall 4. Threats to security of women and their children Men 1. Farmers have problem of transporting their produce thereby incurring huge losses 2. Loss of assets 3. Men are often cut off during rainfall. They are sealed off 4. Accidents All 1. All the reasons are combined When mostly at risk Rainy season Outcome of risk 1. Waste and dangerous items are carried from other locations 2. Health issues especially high blood pressure during rainy season 3. Health outcomes 4. Destruction of properties 5. Destruction of farmlands 6. Accidents/injuries/death What is increasing risk 1. Population increase (civilization) 2. Development (urban development) 3. Non-challant attitude of people 65 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road 4. Waste disposal by some people 5. Law clearance How to reduce risk 1. Repair of roads 2. Prevention of waste dumping (indiscriminate dumping of wastes has been stopped completely) Existing organizations Roles Religious organisations Community Development 1. Construction of bridge Associations 2. Repair of roads/drainages 3. Contribution of money and materials for community development Landlords/landladies 4. Infrastructure for development (land for schools and markets) association 5. Security and peace keeping Youth Forum Local customs/festivals 1. Religious festivals 2. Community day (they can support the bridge project) Community efforts in 1. Repair of roads drainage 2. Expansion of drainage channels (dredging) 3. Each landlord is encouraged to provide drainage in front of the house 4. Box culvert Gender relations (Women) 1. They participate actively 2. They are part of traditional institutions 3. They contribute financially 66 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road CHAPTER 8 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following conclusions and recommendations were presented.  The contractor and PIU shall coordinate with the Oyo State Federal Road Safety Commission and Oyo State Traffic Management Agency all through pre-construction and construction works on site to ensure that safety is maintained and potential traffic impact managed;  Design and construct a temporary alternative access bridge and approach road for community members for pedestrian and light traffic usage;  Install proper lightening and relevant road signage and barriers for safety precautions;  Community members shall be sensitized and duly informed on the time and duration of civil works through consultations;  Community members shall be carried along during project implementation and shall be mobilized to provide community security for equipment and personnel working on site;  Community members shall be given preference for casual labour and semi-skilled labour as much as practicable in order to minimize social problems at the community level;  The stream banks shall be cleared of vegetation and the width widened appropriately along the project area of influence;  The silt, vegetation and solid wastes obstructing the stream shall be cleared and evacuated;  Pre-construction and construction works shall be carried out in an environmentally sustainable and socially responsible and inclusive manner;  The topography of the approach roads to the bridge as well as side drains shall be taken into consideration during the construction for proper discharge downstream and for the avoidance of sheet erosion;  Adequate mitigation measures have been proffered for the few negative environmental and social impacts that may occur due to the activities associated with the proposed works, while enhancement measures are proffered for the potential positive impacts;  Appropriate institutional framework has been drawn up to implement the mitigation measures and the proposed monitoring programmes;  Therefore the proposed intervention work is doable in an environmentally sustainable and socially responsible and inclusive manner, and it is most desirable because of the obvious environmental, health and socio-economic benefits. 67 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road REFERENCES Federal Environmental Protection Agency (1992): Guidelines and Standards for Environmental Pollution Control in Nigeria 238p. FEPA (1991): S.I.15 - National Environmental Protection Management of Solid and Hazardous Waste Regulation. IUFMP (2013): Resettlement Policy Framework IUFMP (2013): Terms of Reference for Design and Supervision of Priority Structural Works. IUFMP (2014): Environmental and Social Management Framework for Ibadan Urban Flood Management Project Final Report IUFMP (2015): Environmental and Social Screening of 14 Priority Sites IUFMP (2015): Project Implementation Manual IUFMP (2016): Inception Report for the Preparation of Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs), Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (ESIAs) and Resettlement Action Plans (RAPs) for Ten (10) Priority Sites IUFMP (2016): Detailed Engineering Design, Preparation of Tender Documents and Construction Supervision for Twelve (10+2) Priority Sites in Ibadan, Draft Final Report, December 2016 IUFMP (2016): Terms of Reference for the Preparation of Environmental And Social Management Plans (ESMPs), Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (ESIAs) and Resettlement Action Plans (RAPs) for Ten (10) Priority Sites World Bank (1996): Environmental Performance Monitoring and Supervision Update No 14 World Bank (1999): Environmental Management Plan , OP 4.01 - Annex C 68 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road ANNEX A: BID SPECIFICATIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS A-1: Construction Impact Management Plan In order to reduce the impact of the construction activities on local communities and the environment, the Construction Contractor shall implement the following Sub-Plans in accordance with the following stipulations: Erosion and Sedimentation Site activities shall be carefully managed in order to avoid site erosion and sedimentation of downstream waterways. In order to minimize negative erosion impacts in the project area, the following activities shall be carried out by the Contractor:  Erosion and sedimentation shall be controlled during the construction. Areas of the site not disturbed by construction activities shall be maintained in their existing state.  Disturb as little ground area as possible; stabilize these areas as soon as possible, control drainage through the area, and trap sediment onsite. Install erosion control barriers around perimeter of cuts, disposal pits, and roadways.  Slope works and earth moving/excavation shall be conducted in order to minimize exposure of the soil surface both in terms of area and duration. Temporary soil erosion control and slope protection works shall be carried out in sequence to construction.  Conserve topsoil with its leaf litter and organic matter, and reapply this material to local disturbed areas to promote the growth of local native vegetation.  Apply local, native grass seed and mulch to barren erosive soil areas or closed construction surfaces.  Apply erosion control measures before the rainy season begins, preferably immediately following construction. Install erosion control measures as each construction site is completed.  In all construction sites, install sediment control structures where needed to slow or redirect runoff and trap sediment until vegetation is re-established. Sediment control structures include windrows of slash, rock berms, sediment catchment basins, straw bales, brush fences, and silt fences.  Control water flow through construction sites or disturbed areas with ditches, berms, check structures, live grass barriers, and rock.  The ground surface at the construction site offices shall be concreted or asphalted in order to minimize soil erosion.  Erosion control measures shall be maintained until vegetation is successfully re-established.  Water shall be sprayed as needed on dirt roads, cuts, fill material and stockpiled soil to reduce wind-induced erosion and dust, and  Larger changes in the landscape from quarries, tunnel spoil tips, etc. should be landscaped and replanted, both to reduce erosion problems and to reduce the visual impact of construction. Particulate Emissions and Dust The Contractor shall propose methods and actions to control dust resulting from construction related activities, crushing and concrete batching plants, earthworks including road construction, embankment and channel construction, haulage of materials and construction work camps. In particular the Contractor shall undertake the following:  Minimize production of dust and particulate materials at all times, to avoid impacts on surrounding communities, and especially to vulnerable people (children, elderly people).  Time removal of vegetation to prevent large areas from becoming exposed to wind.  Place screens around construction areas to minimize dust proliferation, paying particular attention to areas close to local communities.  Spray water as needed on dirt roads, cut areas and soil stockpiles or fill material. Spraying shall be carried out in dry and windy days, at least twice a day (morning and afternoon). The frequency of spraying near local communities shall be increased as needed.  Pave access roads with gravel in the sections which near the communities and other sensitive receptors to reduce generation of air-borne dust.  Provide an adequate ventilation system and other measures to control concentration of air pollutants within tunnels.  Transportation of materials by vehicles and construction of access roads shall be properly designed. For example, the access road can be constructed and paved by concrete/asphalt, or laid with small graded rocks, prior to major earthworks which may require transportation of substantial amount of materials on-site and off-site.  Ensure adequate maintenance of all vehicles. Construction plant/vehicles that generate serious air pollution and those which are poorly maintained shall not be allowed on site.  Transport of chemicals or materials such as cement, sand and lime shall be covered entirely with clean impervious material to ensure that these materials shall be contained. Overflow of material shall be avoided; and  The exhaust gases from construction machinery and vehicles are accepted. However, the engines shall be inspected and adjusted as required to minimize pollution levels. 69 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Noise To minimize noise the Contractor shall:  Maintain all construction-related traffic on project access roads at established speed limits.  Maintain all on-site vehicle speeds at or below 30 kph, or otherwise designated.  To the extent possible, maintain noise levels associated with all machinery and equipment at or below 90 db.  In sensitive areas (including residential neighbourhoods, hospitals, rest homes, schools, etc.) more strict noise abatement measures may need to be implemented to prevent undesirable noise levels.  Apply proper measures to minimize disruptions from vibration or noise coming from construction activities.  Design a transportation schedule for entry of construction materials to minimize the adverse impact on residents, as well as the traffic on the existing roads. The transportation vehicles shall be required to slow down and banned from using horns when passing sensitive areas. Transportation during peak hours should be minimized. The Contractor shall provide the transportation route in advance to the Engineering Supervisor.  Maintain the construction equipment in its best operating conditions and lowest noise levels possible.  Use temporary noise barriers to minimize the noise caused by construction equipment;  Provide hearing protection to workers who must work with highly noisy machines such as piling, explosion, mixing, etc., for noise control and workers protection.  Areas for the storage of fuel or lubricants fenced and have a compacted/impervious floor or other surface to prevent the escape of accidental spillage of fuel and/or lubricants from the site. Surface water drainage from fenced areas shall be discharged through an oil skimmer or other appropriate device to remove hydrocarbons. Empty fuel or oil drums may not be stored on site.  The construction supervision team shall be equipped with portable noise detection devices to monitor the noise level at the sensitive receptors.  Materials leaving the construction site shall be transported during non-peak hours in order to minimize traffic noise due to the increase in traffic volumes.  Use of properly designed silencers, mufflers, acoustically dampened panels and acoustic sheds or shields, etc. shall be made. Mufflers and other noise control devices shall be repaired or replaced if defective.  Use of electric-powered equipment when applicable instead of diesel-powered or pneumatic-powered equipment.  Equipment known to emit strong noise intensity in one direction, shall when possible, be oriented to direct noise away from nearby sensitive receptors.  Machines and equipment that may be in intermittent use shall be shut down between work periods or throttled down to a minimum operation. Night-time Construction Noise Mitigation Although in general, night-time construction shall be banned near sensitive receptors, some construction may still occur for technical and other reasons (e.g., bridge piles required and continued around clock concrete pouring). Because night time construction, if occurring near local communities, will result in significant impacts to residents and other sensitive receptors, the following special measures shall be taken during the construction phase:  People living within potentially impacted areas shall be notified ahead of time of the length and noise intensity of the proposed night-time construction. Residents shall be informed as to why night construction is necessary and they shall be provided with the mitigation measures that are going to be implemented to obtain their understanding. These residents shall be allowed to express their concerns, difficulties, and suggestions for noise control prior to the commencement of night time construction. These concerns shall be addressed and suggestions adopted where appropriate;  Concrete batching plants, generators and other stationary equipment shall be carefully placed as far away from local communities to reduce noise impacts from these machines. Where possible, municipal power supply shall be used for night-time construction as diesel generators are extremely noisy and avoiding their use is the best mitigation possible.  Equipment with lower noise levels shall be used for concrete pouring operations, which may require 24 hour non-stop operation.  Temporary noise barriers shall be installed at the appropriate locations to avoid night-time noise impacts, and  Notification boards shall be posted at all construction sites providing information about the project, as well as contact information about the site managers, environmental staff, telephone numbers and other contact information so that any affected people can have a channel to voice their concerns and suggestions. Earthworks, Cut and Fill Slopes The contractor shall ensure that the following procedures are undertaken:  All earthworks shall be properly controlled, especially during the rainy season.  The Contractor shall maintain stable cut and fill slopes at all times and cause the least possible disturbance to areas outside the prescribed limits of the works. 70 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road  The Contractor shall complete cut and fill operations to final cross-sections at any one location as soon as possible and preferably in one continuous operation to avoid partially completed earthworks, especially during the rainy season.  In order to protect any cut or fill slopes from erosion, in accordance with drawings, cut off drains and toe-drains shall be provided at the top and bottom of slopes and be planted with grass or other plant cover. Cut off drains should be provided above high cuts to minimize water runoff and slope erosion.  Any excavated cut or unsuitable material shall be disposed of in designated disposal areas as agreed to by the Supervisory Engineer, and  Disposal sites should not be located where they can cause future slides, interfere with agricultural land or any other properties, or cause runoff from the landfill towards any watercourse. Drains may need to be dug within and around the landfills, as directed by the Supervisory Engineer. Stockpiles and Borrow Pits The Contractor shall prepare and overall Stockpiles and Borrow Pits Management Plan for the total works. Operation of a new borrowing area, on land, in a river, or in an existing area, shall be subject to prior approval of the Environmental Supervisor, and the operation shall cease if so instructed by the Supervisory Engineer. Borrow pits shall be prohibited where they might interfere with the natural or designed drainage patterns. River locations shall be prohibited if they might undermine or damage riverbanks, or carry too much fine material downstream. The location of crushing plants shall be subject to the approval of the Supervisory Engineer, and not be adjacent to environmentally sensitive areas, or to existing residential settlements, and shall be operated with approved fitted dust control devices. Rock or gravel taken from a river shall be far enough removed to limit the depth of material removed to one-tenth of the width of the river at any one location, and not to disrupt the river flow, or damage or undermine the riverbanks. The Plan shall include:  A map showing the extent of the area to be developed.  A method statement defining the proposed working methods.  The proposed access and haulage routes between the borrow pits and the destination for the extracted materials.  A justification for the quantities of materials to be extracted, an estimation of the waste material to be generated and disposal details for such waste materials.  Details of the measures taken to minimize the borrow pit areas and their visual impact on the surrounding area, and  Details of the measures to be taken for the long-term rehabilitation of the borrow pit areas in order to avoid situations that could constitute a threat to health and safety and cause environmental degradation. In general terms, the Contractor shall:  Identify and demarcate locations for stockpiles and borrow pits, ensuring that they are 15 meters away from critical areas such as steep slopes, erosion-prone soils, and areas that drain directly into sensitive water bodies.  Limit extraction of material to approved and demarcated borrow pits.  Stockpile topsoil when first opening the borrow pit. After all usable borrow has been removed, the previously stockpiled topsoil should be spread back over the borrow area and graded to a smooth, uniform surface, and adequately sloped for drainage. On steep slopes, benches or terraces may have to be established to help control erosion.  Excess overburden should be stabilized and re-vegetated. Where appropriate, organic debris and overburden should be spread over the disturbed site to promote revegetation. Natural re-vegetation is preferred to the best extent practicable.  Existing drainage channels in areas affected by the operation should be kept free of overburden.  Once the job is completed, all construction -generated debris should be removed from the site to an approved disposal location.  The Contractor shall ensure that all borrow pits used are left in an appropriate condition with stable side slopes, re- establishment of vegetation, restoration of natural water courses, avoidance of flooding of the excavated areas wherever possible so no stagnant water bodies are created which could breed mosquitoes, and  When the borrow pits or the local depressions created by the construction activities cannot be refilled or reasonably drained, the Contractor shall consult with the local community to determine their preference for reuse such as fish farming or other community purposes. Disposal of Construction Waste The Contractor shall carry out the following activities:  Establish and enforce daily site clean-up procedures, including maintenance of adequate disposal facilities for construction debris. 71 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road  Debris generated due to the dismantling of the existing structures shall be suitably reused, to the best extent feasible (e.g. as fill materials for embankments). The disposal of remaining debris shall be carried out only at sites identified and approved by the Supervisory Engineer. The Contractor should ensure that these sites (a) are not located within designated forest areas; (b) do not impact natural drainage courses; and (c) do not impact endangered/rare flora. Under no circumstances shall the Contractor dispose of any material in environmentally sensitive areas.  In the event any debris or silt from the sites is deposited on adjacent land, the Contractor shall immediately remove such, debris or silt and restore the affected area to its original state to the satisfaction of Supervisory Engineer.  All arrangements for transportation during construction including provision, maintenance, dismantling and clearing debris, where necessary, will be considered incidental to the work and should be planned and implemented by the contractor as approved and directed by the Supervisory Engineer.  Consult with local communities, if any, living close to spoil disposal sites that may be affected. The consultation shall provide local stakeholders with detailed information of the potential spoil disposal site, and provide an opportunity for them to express their opinions and concerns with the proposed plans. Information and feedback from the consultation process shall be incorporated into the final design for each spoil disposal site.  Include provisions for incorporating the most appropriate stabilization techniques for each disposal site.  Assess risk of any potential impact regarding leaching of spoil material on surface water.  Include an appropriate analysis to determine that the selected spoil disposal sites do not cause unwanted surface drainage, and  Stabilize spoil disposal sites to avoid erosion in accordance with the requirements of the Landscape and Re-vegetation Plan. A-2: Other Management Plans The contractor shall be responsible for preparing the following management plans in accordance with the stipulated terms of reference: Waste Management Plan During the construction stage, the Contractor shall prepare a Waste Management Plan before commencement of project works. The Plan shall include: Water and Wastewater  A review of the preliminary site drainage design prepared during the detailed design.  An update of the preliminary design based on the actual construction program and site specific conditions (e.g. the geographical conditions, location of slopes and the nature of construction work).  Detailed design including drawings, location maps, specifications of drainage collection channels and wastewater treatment facilities.  Proposed discharge locations and treatment standards.  A detailed implementation program of the proposed drainage system.  As part of the design of the site drainage system, surface runoff within the construction site shall be diverted in order to avoid flushing away soil material and the water is treated by device such as sediment trap before discharge.  Domestic sewage from site offices, toilets and kitchen shall either be collected by a licensed waste collector or treated by on-site treatment facilities. Discharge of treated wastewater must comply with the discharge limits according to National regulations.  Prior to the rainy season, all exposed surfaces and slopes shall be properly covered or landscaping shall be provided to minimize run-off of sediment laden. Slope protection can be carried out in sequence to construction and in advance of the rainy season.  Drainage control devices such as sediment traps shall be installed at each discharge outlet, and they shall be cleaned regularly, and  Chemical toilets can be provided on each work site employing 5 workers or more.  At least one toilet shall be installed per 25 workers. Domestic sewage collected from the site office and chemical toilets shall be cleaned up on regular basis. Only licensed waste collectors shall be employed for this disposal. The sludge shall be treated according to the requirements of the Contractor’s Waste Management Plan. Solid Wastes Wastes such as those listed below are expected due to construction activities:  Surplus excavated materials requiring disposal due to earth moving activities and slope cutting.  Disposal of used lumber for trenching works, scaffolding steel material, site hoarding, packaging materials, containers of fuel, lubricant and paint. 72 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road  Waste generated by demolition of existing houses / buildings affected by the project or breaking of existing concrete surfaces.  Waste from on-site wastewater treatment facility (e.g. treatment of bentonite from tunneling works by sedimentation process), and  Domestic waste generated by construction workers, construction campsite and other facilities. The above wastes must be properly controlled through the implementation of the following measures:  Minimize the production of waste that must be treated or eliminated.  Identify and classify the type of waste generated. If hazardous or chemical wastes are generated, proper procedures must be taken regarding their storage, collection, transportation and disposal. (See Emergency Plan for Hazardous Materials and Chemical Waste Management Plan).  Identify and demarcate disposal areas clearly indicating the specific materials that can be deposited in each, and  Control placement of all construction waste (including earth cuts) to approved disposal sites (>300 m from rivers, streams, lakes, or wetlands). Collect and recycle and dispose where necessary in authorized areas all of garbage, metals, used oils, and excess material generated during construction, incorporating recycling systems and the separation of materials. The Contractor shall make a commitment to waste recycling and re-use methods in consideration of the following;  A method statement on waste recycling, re-use and minimization of waste generation.  Excavated material shall be re-used on-site or the nearby road segment / other projects as far as possible in order to minimize the quantity of material to be disposed of.  Recyclable materials such as wooden plates for trench works, steel, scaffolding material, site holding, packaging material, etc. shall be collected and separated on-site from other waste sources. Collected recyclable material shall be re-used for other projects or sold to waste collector for recycling, and  Collected waste shall be disposed of properly through a licensed waste collector. Pollution Prevention Plan Emergency Plan for Hazardous Materials If the construction site is expected to have or suspected of having hazardous materials (chemicals, asbestos, hydrocarbons, or other similar hazardous materials), the Contractor will be required to prepare a Hazardous Waste Management Plan and Emergency Response Plan to be approved by the Environmental Supervisor. Removal and disposal of existing hazardous wastes in project sites should only be performed by specially trained personnel following national or provincial requirements, or internationally recognized procedures. The Contractor shall:  Make the Hazardous Waste Management Plan available to all persons involved in operations and transport activities;  Hazardous waste (or chemical waste) shall be properly stored, handled and disposed of in accordance with the local legislative requirements. Hazardous waste shall be stored at designed location and warning signs shall be posted;  Inform the Environmental Supervisor, or Construction Supervisor of any accidental spill or incident in accordance with the plan;  Prepare a companion Emergency Response Plan outlining all procedures to be undertaken in the event of a spilled or unplanned release;  Initiate a remedial action following any spill or incident; and  Provide a report explaining the reasons for the spill or incident, remedial action taken, consequences/damage from the spill, and proposed corrective actions. The Emergency Plan for Hazardous Materials shall be subsequently updated and submitted to the PEO for no objection. Chemical Waste During construction there will be a potential for pollution to adjacent habitat areas and watercourses caused by chemical wastes such as spent waste oil, spent lubricant, contaminated soil material due to leakage of hydraulic oil, fuel from construction plant or vehicles, etc. The following measures shall be put into place in order to minimize the damage caused by chemical waste:  All refueling of heavy equipment and machinery shall be undertaken by a service vehicle to prevent any spillage or contamination by chemical wastes such as maintenance oils, lubricants, etc.  All the fuel and hazardous material storage shall be adequately enclosed to prevent any spillage problems;  Storm water runoff from open workshops, repair areas, and enclosed storage areas shall be collected and treated in hydrocarbon separation pits/tanks before discharge to drains and waterways.  All explosives shall be transported, stored and handled in accordance with applicable laws and good design engineering and constructions practices. The contractor shall provide details of proposed storage and security arrangements, and 73 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road  Pesticides and shall be packaged, labeled, handled, stored and disposed of according to National standards . Maintenance of Construction Equipment The Contractor shall:  Identify and demarcate equipment maintenance areas (>15m from rivers, streams, lakes or wetlands). Fuel storage shall be located in proper areas and approved by the PEO.  Ensure that all equipment maintenance activities, including oil changes, are conducted within demarcated maintenance areas; never dispose spent oils on the ground, in water courses, drainage canals or in sewer systems, and  All spills and collected petroleum products shall be disposed of in accordance with standard environmental procedures/guidelines. Fuel storage and refilling areas shall be located at least 100m from all cross drainage structures and important water bodies. A-3: Safety During Construction The Contractor’s responsibilities include the protection of every person and nearby property from construction accidents. The Contractor shall be responsible for complying with all national and local safety requirements and any other measures necessary to avoid accidents, including the following:  Present details regarding maximum permissible vehicular speed on each section of road;  Establish safe sight distance in both construction areas and construction camp sites;  Place signs around the construction areas to facilitate traffic movement, provide directions to various components of the works, and provide safety advice and warning. All signs shall be in English and the local language;  Estimate maximum concentration of traffic (number of vehicles/hour);  Be held responsible for any damage caused to local roads and bridges due to the transportation of excessive loads, and shall be required to repair such damage;  Not use any vehicles, either on or off road with grossly excessive, exhaust or noise emissions. In any built up areas, noise mufflers shall be installed and maintained in good condition on all motorized equipment under the control of the Contractor;  Carefully and clearly mark pedestrian-safe access routes;  If school children are in the vicinity, include traffic safety personnel to direct traffic during school hours;  Maintain a supply for traffic signs (including paint, easel, sign material, etc.), road marking, and guard rails to maintain pedestrian safety during construction;  Conduct safety training for construction workers prior to beginning work;  Provide personal protective equipment and clothing (goggles, gloves, respirators, dust masks, hard hats, steel-toed boots, etc.) for construction workers and enforce their use;  Provide post Material Safety Data Sheets for each chemical present on the worksite;  Require that all workers read, or are read, all Material Safety Data Sheets. Clearl explain the risks to them and their partners, especially when pregnant or planning to start a family. Encourage workers to share the information with their physicians, when relevant;  Ensure that the removal of asbestos-containing materials or other toxic substances be performed and disposed of by specially trained workers;  During heavy rains or emergencies of any kind, suspend all work. A-4: Environmental Training for Construction Workers During construction there will be a potential for workers to damage protected areas and waterways adjacent to camps and work areas. The Contractor shall prepare an Environmental Training Plan for all construction workers: the Plan shall address the following items:  All Contractor’s employees shall be required to comply with environmental protection procedures and they shall be able to provide evidence that they attended the training sessions detailed in the Plan;  The Plan shall educate all construction workers on the following issues but not limited to them: fire arm possession, traffic regulations, illegal logging and collection of non-timber forestry products, hunting and fishing restrictions, waste management, erosion control, health and safety issues, all prohibited activities, the Code of Conduct requirements and disciplinary procedures, and general information on the environment in which they will be working and living;  Establishment of penalties for those who violate the rules; and  Proposed methods for conducting the training program, which shall include formal training sessions, posters, data in newsletters, signs in construction and camp areas and ‘tool box’ meetings. 74 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road ANNEX B: QUESTIONNAIRE HOUSEHOLD QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) AND ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP) FOR THE IUFMP 10 PRIOIRITY SITES Ibadan Urban Flood Management project (IUFMP) that aims at developing a long-term flood risk management framework by initiating risk assessment, community awareness, and providing enough flexibility in the project design to make changes based on learning. This interview forms part of the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment and Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) of the project. We need your cooperation in answering the questions asked below. Your answers will be treated as confidential. SECTION A: IDENTIFICATION AND BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICS A1 LGA: A2 Name of Town/City/ Community: A3 Project location NO. QUESTION AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES CODES A4 Stratum Urban 1 Rural 2 A5 Age Last Birthday: A6 Gender of Respondent Male 1 Female 2 A7 Marital Status Never Married 1 Married 2 Separated 3 Divorced 4 Widow 5 A8 What religion do you practice? Christian 1 Muslim 2 Traditional 3 Others Specify 4 A9 Highest Educational Attainment No Formal 1 Primary School Not Completed 2 Primary School Completed 3 Secondary School Not Completed 4 Secondary School Completed 5 Post Secondary Education 6 Koranic Education 7 Other (specify) A10 Primary occupation of respondents Civil servants 1 Farming 2 Fishing 3 Artisan 4 Trading 5 Professional 6 Retired 7 Unemployed 8 Others Specify 9 A11 Secondary occupation of respondents Civil servants 1 Farming 2 Fishing 3 Artisan 4 Trading 5 Professional 6 75 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Retired 7 Others Specify 8 A12 Estimated monthly income from primary occupation A13 Estimated monthly income from secondary occupation A14 How long have you lived in this community (Years) A15 Did you receive any financial or in-kind Yes 1 support from relatives, friends or charitable organizations in the last 12 months? No 2 A16 If YES, complete the following: Source of financial support Total amount in cash/kind received in the last 12 months 1. Relative & family member N 2. Friends N 3. Charitable organisations N 4. Mutual support groups N A17 What sort of housing does your household Bungalow 1 live in? Duplex 2 Detached 3 Semidetached 4 One room apartment 5 Self-contain 6 Tent 7 A18 Type of materials used for your house Wood 1 Brick/Mud 2 Cement Block 3 Plastered brick/mud 4 Plastered cement block 5 Any other, specify 6 A19 Source of drinking water for members of Piped into house 1 your household Piped into yard or plot 2 Public tap 3 Tubewell/borehole with pump 4 Protected dug well 5 Protected spring 6 Rainwater collection 7 Bottled water 8 Unprotected dug well 9 Unprotected spring 10 Pond, river or stream 11 Tanker-truck, vendor 12 Other 13 A20 What kind of toilet facility do members of Flush or pour flush toilet 1 your household usually use? Pit latrine 2 Composting toilet 3 Bucket toilet 4 No facility/Bush field 5 Others, specify 6 A21 Estimated Extra-expenses due to Below ₦ 10,000 1 culvert/bridge Collapse ₦ 11,000-20,000 2 ₦ 21,000-30,000 3 ₦ 31,000-40,000 4 ₦ 41,000-50,000 5 ₦ 51,000 and above 6 A22 Perceptions on present socio-economic status Good 1 due to flooding and culvert collapse Fair 2 Deplorable 3 Hopeless 4 Other specify 5 76 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road SECTION B: AVAILABILITY OF AMENITIES AND WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD B1 How would you describe the condition of the following amenities in your community? Amenities Good Fair Poor Roads to the community Roads within the community Schools in the community Public Health Institutions Potable Water Public Electricity Communication facilities (Postal Service, Telephone) Public recreation facilities B2 What are the sources of electricity supply Hurricane Lamp 1 used by your household? (Please Tick as Rechargeable Lamp 2 appropriate) Private Generators 3 Company operating in your 4 community 5 IBEDC (National Grid) 6 B3 What are the source of fuel you used for Firewood 1 cooking in your household? (Please Tick as Charcoal 2 appropriate) Kerosine 3 Gas 4 Electricity 5 Saw dust 6 Others, specify 7 B4 How do you dispose your household waste? Burying 1 (Tick all that apply) Bush 2 Burning 3 Open dump 4 Organised Collection by private 5 organisation 6 Organised Collection by government 7 Dumped in the nearby river channel 8 Dumped in the nearby gutter 9 Others, Specify........................ 10 B5 Please rate the level of effectiveness of solid Very effective 1 waste management in your community? Fairly effective 2 Not effective 3 SECTION C: FLOODING, CULVERT/BRIDGE AND IMPACTS C1 What has been the impact of the flood event Wash the road away 1 on road infrastructure Cause pot holes 2 Cut off the road completely 3 Others, specify...................... 4 C2 What has been the impact of the flood event Wash off the bridge 1 on bridge/culvert infrastructure Collapsed the bridge 2 Undermine/Weaken the bridge 3 Others, Specify............... 4 C3 What has been the impact of the flood event Hinders movement 1 on accessibility to the community? Block access completely 2 Block access for some time 3 Block vehicular movement 4 Others specify...................... 5 C4 State the effect of the flooding and culvert/bridge with respect to the following aspects Socio-economic aspects Highly Negative Negative No Effect 1. Livelihoods 2. Assets 3. Housing 77 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road 4. Health 5. Education 6. Production/productivity 7. Income earning/profit 8. Electricity supply 9. Access to safe water source 10. Ease of movement 11. Displacement 12. Ease of access to neighbouring communities 13. Others specify C5 Please, indicate effect of flooding and culvert/bridges collapse on the following categories of people: Category of people Affected Less Affected No difference 1. Children 2. Youth 3. Adult 4. The Elderly 5. Women 6. The Handicapped C6 Describe the level of awareness about this Very aware 1 project in your community? Moderately aware 2 Not aware 3 C7 What positive impacts do you think the Increase in employment opportunity 1 project will bring to the community (Tick as Increase in land price 2 many as applicable)? More value for local product 3 Better infrastructure Facility 4 Increase in business opportunity. 5 Others Specify 6 C8 What negative impacts do you think the Pressure on existing infrastructure 1 project will bring to the community (Tick as Influx of population 2 many as applicable)? Conflict with outsiders 3 Increase in antisocial elements 4 Others Specify 5 C9 In what ways do you think the construction Improve their business 1 will affect Okada riders in this community? Reduce their business 2 Will have no effect 3 C10 In what ways do you think the construction Improve their business 1 will affect Tricycle operators in this Reduce their business 2 community? Will have no effect 3 C11 In what ways do you think the construction Improve their business 1 will affect Car/Bus drivers in this Reduce their business 2 community? Will have no effect 3 C12 Please, indicate effect of project on the following categories of people: Category of people Affected Less Affected No difference 1. Children 2. Youth 3. Adult 4. The Elderly 5. Women 6. The Handicapped C13 How will the project affect school children? Stop them from going to school 1 Make them go late to school 2 Can cause injury while going to school 3 Make them return late from school 4 Have no effect 5 C14 What effect will the project have on the Disrupt their movement 1 78 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road elderly? Cause injury 2 Disallow relatives from visiting 3 Have no effect 4 C15 What effect will the project have on pregnant Deny access to ante natal clinic 1 women? Cause delivery at home 2 Cause injury 3 Have no effect 4 C16 What effect will the project have on the Impaired movement 1 handicap/visually impaired? Cause injury 2 Have no effect 3 C17 What sort of transport does your family own? Bicycle 1 Motorcycle 2 Tricycle 3 Car 4 Truck 5 Bus 6 Others, Specify.......... 7 C18 What mode of transport do you frequently Bicycle 1 use? Motorcycle 2 Tricycle 3 Car 4 Truck 5 Bus 6 Others, Specify.......... 7 SECTION D: COPING STRATEGIES Please describe the coping strategy(ies) adopted by you and your household with respect to the effect of flood and culvert collapse on the following. Indicate effectiveness of coping strategies. Codes: very effective(1), effective (2) Not effective (3) Effect of Flood and Effectiveness Culvert collapse Coping Strategy(ies) 1 2 3 D1 Constrained Access to 1. Adopt low profile living standard means of Livelihood 2. Rely on neighbours/friends/relations 3. Rely on Government relief materials 4. Others (Specify) D2 Lack of access to 1. Rely on menial jobs economic assets 2. Adopt low profile living standard 3. Rely on neighbours/friends/relations 4. Others (Specify) D3 Damage to Dwelling 1. Stay in poor quality housing Unit 2. Squatting 3. Staying with neighbours/relations/friends 4. Others (Specify) D4 Constrained Access to 1. Rely on chemist shops/drug vendors health facilities 2. Rely on herbs /other traditional remedies 3. Rely on religious homes/spiritual options 4. Others (Specify) D5 Constrained access to 1. Children abandoned schooling educational facilities 2. Children sent to distant schools outside the community 3. Irregular school attendance by children 4. Others (Specify) D6 Income earning/Profit 1. Adopt low profile living standard making 2. Rely on neighbours/friends/relations 3. Rely on Government relief materials 4. Others (Specify) D7 Poor state of electricity 1. Rely on Generating set/Touch light/Rechargeable lamp supply 2. Rely on candle 79 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road 3. Rely on oil lamp 4. Others (Specify) D8 Constrained Access to 1. Tanker supply/Water vendor improved water facility 2. Well 3. Bore-hole 4. Rain water 5. River/Stream/Spring 6. Dugout/Pond/Lake/Dam/Pool 7. Others (Specify) Thank you for your cooperation 80 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road ANNEX C: MINUTES OF STAKEHOLDER’S MEETING IBADAN URBAN FLOOD MANAGEMENT, IBADAN, OYO STATE Report on Stakeholders’ Forum 20thJune, 2016 MAJE FAKU IDI-MANGO COMMUNITY This makes the fifthstakeholder’s forum. The forum was held in the community adjacent to the Maje River. Arrival of community stakeholders,project team and government officials- 10:00am to 11:00am. The meeting commenced at 11:05am. Mr. Muyiwa Ojo the first vice president of Maje Faku community called and introduced members of the high table. He gave a prelude about the community and mentioned that the community is a very big community and not just a village. He mentioned that the community road is linked to Ijebu-Ode and Ijebu-Igbo. He finalized his prelude by introducing the news men in the forum which are news reporters from Fresh FM and The Tribune. The opening prayer was done by Chief Oladokun. The welcoming speech was given by the president in the person of Engineer Omotayo Runsewe. The president greeted and welcomed everyone present. In his welcome address, he said the community had gone a long way and tried all their possible best to do a lot of interventions/palliatives in the community and we really appreciate that government is helping the community now. He thanked all and sundry for the commitments put into the community development. Speech from the consultant: Dr. Olorunfemi Felix gave the speech. He welcomed and thanked everyone present at the forum. He introduced himself and tendered apology on behalf of Professor Gbenle who is the chief consultant. He states the reason for this forum and why it is different from other past forums done in the communities. He mentioned that this present forum is basically for socio-economic impact survey in the entire communities. The team wants to know what are likely to be the socio-economic impacts or consequences when the project is going on and at the completion of the project for proper evaluation in the nearest future for documentation of the community’s plights. He told them further that that there are several enumerators all around the communities who are administering sets of questionnaire to gather information on the socio-economic impacts in the communities, therefore, they and their family should endeavor to give the attention needed to the enumerators for them to get the necessary information. Also, some of us sitting here would be interviewed for Key Informant Interview after the meeting by some of the project team members here for data triangulation. He finalized that the team would still be coming back next week for another part of the survey which includes community risk management among others for the accomplishment of the proposed project. Speech from the Engineer: Engineer Tajudeen Akanbi welcomed everyone present at the forum. He started his speech by given a prelude on flood crises that occurred in August 26, 2011 in Ibadan that a lot of lives and properties were lost. It was inspite of these calamities that made the state governor to seek assistance from the World Bank and thank God, the World Bank agreed to borrow Oyo state money for intervention programme. But before the money would be released, World Bank specification must be met which one of them is the socio-economic impact assessment we are doing now and the reason for this forum. So many other studies were carried out to know the reasons behind the flooding which examples are community development, blockage of drainage with dirts and inability of culvert facilities to cater for the flooding capacity. He finalized his speech by pleading to the community members to cooperate with them and told them to endeavor to answer questions they would be asked at the KII section and questionnaire administration. Speech from Mrs. Dada the social safe guard analyst. The Engineer and I came from the same department (Ibadan Urban Flood Management), and everybody has his/her role to play. My role is to make sure peace reign, there is cooperation, coordination, protection and security. We 81 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road have done series of studies which is the preparatory stage. We are now on the implementation stage which is the more reason why this forum is necessary. Other meetings will still hold for updates on the project which will involve community development associations (CDA), National Union of Road Transport Workers (NURTW) community women, bike (Okada) riders among others. She urged the community members to endeavor to maintain peace when the project is going on and if otherwise, the project will be stalled. She mentioned to them that a committee would be formed called Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) to settle any conflict that might arise at the course of the project. Speech from the Baale of the community in the person of Chief Isiaka Bello Olupoju. He greeted and thanked everyone seated. He personally thanked the government, all government officials and the consultation team. In his speech, he gave assurance of full cooperation and peace in the community. He said they would provide all necessary contacts for the team to contact in case of any issue or conflicts crop up. He mentioned that there was a flood crisis that led to the death of three people recently, so why would anybody want to hinder or obstruct the project that is a progress and development process for the community. He curses on anyone that would act or ever think of looking for a way to disrupt the development. He went further to present and recommends the president of Soka-Alabamiji in the person of Engr. Tayo Runsewe to be the face and point of contact of the community to the project team. He gave a summary of the good deeds the president had done in the community. Mentioned but not limited to palliative culvert done solely by him in the community, prompt conflicts resolution and well coordination of the entire community. He pleaded to the Engr. for the road from Soka to Alabameji to be reconstructed for them. He finalized by saying he knows the president would help the project team on security and protection of workers and equipment because he knows he is much capable. Speech from the President- Engr. Omotayo Runsewe The president welcomed and greeted everyone present at the forum. He said with the support of the entire community, they have been able to do a lot of interventions on all aspects of community development with the culvert construction inclusive. He said he and the community really appreciate that government is now coming to their aide to assist them on the big project. He thanked all and sundry for the commitments put in all ramifications in the development of the community. Questions, Answers, Comments and Clarifications Mr. Kehinde Olukobi from Moje. He said there some of them that are youths and graduates in various disciplines who are yet to get a suitable employment. He then asked if there is any way they can be favored by been employed to help work/participate in the project work to earn some money? Engr. Aderemi Okelola- Baale and project manager of Faruku community. He asked the project what can be done to assist them in construction of other bridges aside from the Maje-Soka bridge mentioned? Alhaji Amoo Ayuba for Maje-Itesiwaju estate asked that been a building materials distributor such as cement, sand and so on, can he have the opportunity been contracted to supply necessary building materials for the project? The Iyalode of the community in the person of Chief Sidikatu Lamide pleaded for the bridge to be lifted high when it is being constructed. Iya Afin Chief Mrs. Akinfemisoye asked when then project is starting because there have being so many promises which never comes to reality. She also made request for alternative route, extension of the bridge by making reference to St. Louis bridge in Molete, and consideration for women involvement in the proposed project. Engr. Tajudeen responded to all of these questions. On employment opportunity and supply of materials, he said he cannot assure them any of these because its not in their hand to decide on such matters. But he knows there would be advertisement placement and would be competitive. All decisions on that lie in the hand of the contractor because some of the contractors have all 82 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road necessary materials and equipment needed for their jobs. But he can assure that one way or the other, there would always be coperate social responsibility (CSR) On request for construction of other bridges, he advised that letters should be written to the Ibadan Urban Flood Management office for considerations. But for these other projects we have been talking about, they are priority project and I am assuring the community that it would definitely be done to the best quality. On structure of the bridge, he said before now, what engrs. do is long term analysis but things had changed now. What is in vogue now that we also do is desk research. That is the next stage after the design stage which is also part of the social aspect, had been completed. Some workers will still come to stream any time from now for soil testing, topography, flood capacity, water for domestic use among others. He assured and promised the community that quality project would never be compromised. On when the project is starting, he said it depends on the feasibility studies and material testing which must be according to the World Bank’s specifications. The outcome of these studies would determine the starting time. But the government had also urge us to hasting and fast track all we would be doing and should be done with perfection. On alternative route, it is definitely in consideration and would not be decided on the draft report that would be submitted. That’s why we urge every community member to please give responses judiciously to questions they would be asked either through the questionnaire or through the key informant interview. He finalised by saying for better work to be done and achieved, approach roads would be done to some extent and with further collaboration and cooperation with the Local Government Area, other parts left shall be completed. Mrs. Dada was called to make a final comment. She said there would definitely be an alternative route before the entire bridge is cut-off and she urged them to please cooperate with any member of the team that comes for one thing or the other. Closing prayer was done by Iya Afin Chief Mrs. Akinfemisoye. The meeting came to an end at 12:15pm. Attendance: 33 83 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road ANNEX D: ATTENDANCE AND PHOTOS AT STAKEHOLDER’S MEETING Plate I: Attendance Sheet Stakeholders Meeting 84 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Plate II: Maje Stakeholder Meeting Pictures 85 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road ANNEX E: ATTENDANCE AND PHOTOS AT COMMUNITY RISK ASSESSMENT Plate III: Community Risk Assessment Attendance Sheet 86 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Community Risk Assessment Session Livelihoods Activities in the Community Major Road and River Pollution Collapsed bridge and electric pole Plate III: Community Risk Assessment Pictures 87 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road ANNEX F: SCHEDULE OF FEEDBACK TO STAKEHOLDER COMMUNITIES ON SOCIOECONOMIC/HAZARDS SURVEY Project Phase Stakeholder Groups Feedback Issues Responsibility / Language of Communication Pre – Construction  Policy and measures for promoting IUFMP- Social Phase social accountability and Development Specialist / environmental sustainability of the English and/or Yoruba project  Need for the cooperation of the community members with the contractor  Security of lives of the construction workers and security of equipment  Sensitizing communities on alternate routes during construction  Availability of local workforce  Community leaders; within the community  Executives of Landlord  Perception of likely hazards Associations; involved in the project activities C construction  Women and Youth groups;  Review of cooperation with the IUFMP- Social Phase  Religious groups (Christian contractor Development Specialist / and Muslim);  Review of security situation in the English and/or Yoruba  Opinion groups; environment  Representatives of physically  Review of likely hazards involved challenged; in the project activities  NGOs (Red Cross Society);  Review of accessibility to the community  Market women and men;  Review of how the various groups  Community development in the community are coping Post-Construction / associations and councils  Enlightenment on proper solid IUFMP- Social Operations / (CDAs & CDCs); waste disposal to prevent blockage Development Specialist / Maintenance Phase of water ways English and/or Yoruba  Discussion on proper ways to maintain side drains along the approach roads.  Enlightenment on Disaster Risk Reduction measures.  Enlightenment on how to help in maintaining the bridge/culvert constructed  Appreciation of the community members for their support and cooperation during the construction 88 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road ANNEX G: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL CHECKLIST Project Phase Main Check Items Yes: Y Confirmation of Environmental No: N Considerations (Reasons, Mitigation Measures) Pre-Construction (a) Has the ESMP report been disclosed to (a) (a) stakeholders? (b) Has the ESMP report been approved (b) (b) by the relevant authorities? (c) Has training programme for the (c) (c) implementation of the ESMP been conducted? (d) Have the motor vehicles, equipment (d) (d) and machinery for construction been checked for minimizing air and noise pollutions? (e) Have actions been taken to minimize (e) (e) loss of vegetation and fauna habitat alteration? (f) Have actions been taken to minimize (f) (f) loss of soil quality? (g) Have actions been taken to minimize (g) (g) contamination of surface water as a result of runoff from exposed soils and construction spoils? (h) Have actions been taken to minimize (h) (h) generation of spoils and other construction wastes? (i) Has action been taken to minimize risk (i) (i) of road traffic accidents and injuries, occupational and social hazards and risk of environmental diseases? (j) Has action been taken to maximise (j) (j) employment of local labour for site clearing? Construction (a) Are the motor vehicles, equipment and (a) (a) machinery for construction being maintained for minimizing air and noise pollutions? (b) Are burrow pits properly abandoned (b) (b) immediately after use? (c) Are actions taken to minimize loss of (c) (c) soil quality? (d) Are actions taken to minimize (d) (d) contamination of surface water as a result of runoff from exposed soils and construction spoils? (e) Are actions taken to minimize (e) (e) generation of spoils and other construction wastes? (f) Is action taken to minimize surface (f) (f) water run-off due to diversion during construction? (g) Is action taken to mitigate the (g) (g) disruption of river bank due to 89 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road construction activities? (h) Are actions taken to minimize damage (h) (h) to and disruption of services of existing underground public utility cables and pipes? (i) Are actions taken to minimize (i) (i) congestion of traffic and associated risks, as well as occupational and social hazards and risks of environmental and social diseases? (j) Is action taken to maximise (j) (j) employment of local labour for construction activities? Post-Construction (a) Are actions taken to prevent (a) (a) / Operation / reoccurrence of flooding as a result of the Maintenance predisposition of people to solid waste disposal in the stream or side drains? (b) Is the culvert certified as improved and (b) (b) safe? (c) Are the approach road and drains (c) (c) certified as improved and functional? (d) Are actions taken for the restoration of (d) (d) flora and fauna habitat? (e) Is the soil stabilization and restoration (e) (e) certified? (f) Is improved solid waste management (f) (f) implemented? (g) Is the contamination of surface water (g) (g) as a result of waste dumping in and around the river being prevented? (h) Are the risks of occupational and (h) (h) social accidents and injuries in using the new bridge taken care of? (i) Are the social and occupational (i) (i) interaction and welfare arising from improved road infrastructure being enhanced? (j) Are opportunities for creation of (j) (j) employment, diversification of livelihood and increased productivity enhanced? (k) Is the reduction in public spending on (k) (k) replacement and rehabilitation of road infrastructure being maintained? (l) Is the reduced mortality and morbidity (l) (l) from water related diseases maintained? 90 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road ANNEX H: TERMS OF REFERENCE TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLANS (ESMPs), ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS (ESIAs) AND ABREVIATED RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLANS (ARAPs) FOR TEN (10) PRIORITY SITES OF IUFMP 1.0 Background The World Bank is supporting the Oyo State Government to implement the Ibadan Urban Flood Management project (IUFMP) that aims at developing a long-term flood risk management framework by initiating risk assessment, community awareness, and providing enough flexibility in the project design to make changes based on learning. The project also supports capacity building for flood risk management in the city of Ibadan. It reinforces Oyo State government’s early warning and response capabilitie s and leverages existing World Bank projects in Oyo State in support of the IUFMP. Specifically, the Bank’s support will finance some priority investments related to improving the infrastructure of Ibadan Ci ty, especially those destroyed by August 26, 2011 floods. The Bank's support will help Ibadan reduce flood risks, improve waste collection and treatment, while developing and improving the quality of existing infrastructural assets. The project would be designed to keep a good balance between urgent post disaster needs (dredging, reconstruction of bridges, roads, etc.) and medium-to-long term needs (institutional support, upgrading existing and building new infrastructure to upgrade services and mitigate future risks). Selected sub - projects should comply with regional and local government plans, address critical issues described above to integrate planning and operational aspects that maximize the benefits of infrastructure investments to the beneficiary communities in the long run. The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to “improve the capacity of Oyo State to manage flood ris k and to respond effectively and promptly to flooding in the city of Ibadan�. In Oyo State, IUFMP activities involve medium-sized civil works such as construction of infrastructure and/or stabilization or rehabilitation in and around the Ibadan city. These could result in environmental and social impacts thus triggering the World Bank’s Safeguard Policies including Environmental Assessment OP 4.01; Involuntary Resettlement OP4.12; Natural Habitats OP 4.04; Physical Cultural Resources OP 4.11, and Safety of Dams OP 4.37 and Public Disclosure OP 17.60. The environmental and social safeguards concerns are being addressed through the national instrument already prepared under the project: an Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF). This framework instrument need to be translated into specific cost, measurable, and monitorable actions for specific intervention sites through the preparation of site-specific management and action plans. ESMF:In general, the ESMF specifies the procedures to be used for preparing, approving and implementing: (i) Environmental and Social Assessments (ESIA) and or (ii) Environmental and Social Management Plans(ESMPs) for individual civil works packages developed for each project. ESMPs are essential elements for Category B projects. RPF. The RPF applies when land acquisition leads to the temporary or permanent physical displacement of persons, and/or loss of shelter, and /or loss of livelihoods and/or loss, denial or restriction of access to economic resources due to project activities. It sets out the resettlement and compensation principles, organizational arrangements and design criteria to be applied to meet the needs of project-affected people, and specifies the contents of a Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan (ARAP) for each package of investments. A Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF), which serves as a practical tool during the programme formulation, design, implementation and monitoring, was prepared for IUFMP which serves as a guide for the present terms of reference. 2.0 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES: The specific objective is for the Consultant to assist Oyo State to undertake the necessary studies and prepare an Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) Reports; Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Reports and Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plans (ARAP) of the proposed sub-project in compliance with the World Bank environmental, social safeguards policies and procedures as well as the Oyo State Ministry of Environment and Habitat and the Federal Ministry of Environment guidelines and procedures. This Terms of Reference (TOR) is to request a consultancy firm with extensive experience and skill in the preparation of the following Safeguard Instruments for the respective sites mentioned below: 91 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road 2.1 Environmental and Social Management Plan Study Reports for: i) Omiri Culvert,Omiri; ii) Olorungunwa Culvert Poat Area; iii) Maje River culvert Iid- Mango Road; iv) Foworogi Culvert, Egbeda Tuba; v) Elere River Culvert, Egbada Tuba; vi) Ebenezery Culvert, Alakia Isebo and vii) Alaro Culv ert, 7-Up Road. 2.2 Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (ESIAs) for: i. Ogbere Moradeyo; ii. Believers Stream Odo Ona Elewe and iii. Alaro Poly Road – Sango – Eleyele Road 2.3 Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plans for: I. Alaro Poly Road – Sango – Eleyele Road; II. Omiri Culvert,Omiri and III. Believers Stream Odo Ona Elewe. The Terms of Reference (TOR) define the scope of work and core tasks to be assigned to the Consultant. The Consultant is expected to make reference to the feasibility study and designs of the proposed bridge/culverts to be constructed from the Project Implementation Unit (PIU). 3.0 GOAL OF THE WORK The proposed rehabilitation and stabilization of the hydraulic structures in these priority sites mentioned above will reverse the current trend as much as possible and preserve the by-pass that is being degraded by the flooding pattern in those areas such that the proposed structure can cope with recurrent flood events for several years. The reconstruction of the bridge, culvert and road approaches is classified as category “A� or category “B� projects according to the World Bank categorization and a category I or II projects according to the FMEnv categorization. Thus, it will require an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) or Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) respectively. From the foregoing, the significant impacts that are likely to occur from the Category A projects are sensitive, diverse and unprecedented and might be felt beyond immediate project environment; while impacts likely to occur for the category B projects are less significant which can be reduced or minimized through compliance with appropriate mitigation measure. Thus, the nature of the category B project is such that it will not represent a large-scale intervention in the site and will not fundamentally change the environment if adequately mitigated. 4.0 PRIORITY SITES WITH ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLANS (ESMPs) The ESMP should consist of a well-documented set of mitigation, monitoring, and institutional actions to be taken before and during implementation to eliminate adverse environmental and social impacts, offset them, or reduce them to acceptable levels. It should also include the measures needed to implement these actions, addressing the adequacy of the monitoring and institutional arrangements at upstream and downstream in the intervention site. 4.1.0 OMIRI CULVERT–OMIRI (OMI RIVER) The sub-project activities in components 2 (sub component 2.1) will involve critical infrastructure improvements which includes the construction of a replacement of the existing culvert with a larger capacity single cell box relief culvert and road way approaches etc. 4.1.1 OMIRI CULVERT STUDY AREA: The Omiri Culvert – Omiran (Omi River) priority site is located in Egbeda Local Government Area. The site falls within the Ibadan Metropolis and lies between x and y coordinates N7.37441 and E3.9966 and at altitude 195msl. 4.1.2 RATIONALE OF THE OMIRI CULVERT STUDY Omiri River flowing through Adekola community is channeled by a dilapidated culvert with no protective barriers on both sides of the culvert. This is a hazard to users due to the height of the road. Drainages are blocked with waste preventing free flow of water. The topography of the project area of influence is a gentle slope and characterized by igneous rock formations with sandy soils. The area receives surface water (upstream) from Omi Riverand discharges at Christ Power - Olode. Vegetation in the area is composed mainly of few trees, high shrubs and grasses. However, the original vegetation has been undergoing modifications 92 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road due to urban expansions and human activities.Human activities have impacted on the environment resulting in series of environmental and social concerns such as existing drains are blocked with solid waste. Collapsed culvert with debris Collapsed culvert The proposed civil works include; i. replacement of the existing culvert with a larger capacity single cell box relief culvert with preference given to providing a single opening to minimize the potential for debris blockage., ii. construction of appropriate bed scour (upstream and downstream) and side protection to prevent outflanking and iii. construction of formal roadway approaches and associated drainage (for the full width of the floodplain) and the minimum land area required for the proposed intervention is estimated at about 25m2 Specifically, the design includes: a. Excavation and stabilization; b. Construction of bed and concrete screeding; c. Construction of 9� thick reinforced concrete retaining wall (Abutments); d. Construction of deck concrete; and e. Construction of Parapet wall. Plate 1: Omiri Culvert – Omiran (Omi River) Schematic Layout 4.2.0 OLORUNGUNWA CULVERT – POAT (OMI RIVER)STUDY AREA: The Olorungunwa Culvert – Poat Area (Omi River) priority site is located in Egbeda Local Government Area. The site falls within the Ibadan Metropolis and lies between x and y coordinates N7.36993 and E3.99749 and at an altitude of 190msl. 4.2.1 RATIONALE OF THE OLORUNGUNWA CULVERT STUDY 93 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road The existing inadequate Olorungunwa culvert constructed on an earth road has a flow of water from Olorunguwa stream to Omi River. The existing road has been damaged by erosion. There is excessive growth of weeds which obstructs the flow of water. Drainage exists on only one side of the road. The topography of the project area of influence is a gentle slope and characterized by igneous rock formations with sandy soils. The area receives surface water (upstream) from Olorungunwa stream/springand discharges at Omi River. Vegetation in the area is composed mainly of few trees, high shrubs and grasses. However, the original vegetation has been undergoing modifications due to urban expansions and human activities. Human activities have impacted on the environment resulting in series of environmental and social concerns such as sheet erosion, presence of undercutting in roads/ erosion, No drainages on existing earth roads; Aquatic weeds restricting flow of water and high sediment load in stream. Collapsed culvert Collapsed culvert and road approaches without drainages The proposed civil works include constructing appropriate road drainage to carry the significant flows that can be generated during intense storms and routing these flows through a new single cell box culvert under the road and into the natural channels beyond and the minimum land area required for the proposed intervention is estimated at about 25m2 Specifically, the design includes: f. Excavation and stabilization; g. Construction of bed and concrete screeding; h. Construction of 9� thick reinforced concrete retaining wall. (Abutments); i. Construction of deck concrete; and j. Construction of Parapet wall. 94 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Plate 1: Olorungunwa Culvert – Poat Area (Omi River)Schematic Layout 4.3.0 MAJE – IDI MANGO ROAD (OGUNPA RIVER) STUDY AREA: The Maje River – Maje - Idi Mango Road (Ogunpa River) priority site is located in Oluyole Local Government Area. The site falls within the Ibadan Metropolis and lies between x and y coordinates N7.31603 and E3.89197 at an altitude of 150msl. 4.3.1 RATIONALE OF MAJE – IDI MANGO ROAD (OGUNPA RIVER) STUDY Maje River flows through Maje/Idi-oro community in Oluyole LGA with culvert sited on Idi Mango road. The road crossing here is frequently overtopped, causing significant local disruption to social activities. In 2014 there have been several disruptions which have caused damage to properties. The culvert is damaged and water flow through drains is hampered by water weeds. The topography of the project area of influence is a gentle slope and characterized by lateritic soils. The area receives surface water (upstream) from Ogbere River and flows to Ogunpa River. Vegetation in the area is composed mainly of high shrubs, grasses and water weeds. However, the original vegetation has been undergoing modifications due to urban expansions and human activities. Human activities have impacted on the environment resulting in series of environmental and social concerns such aquatic weeds restricting flow of water; high sediment/solid waste load in stream. Pipe culvert blocked by debris High sediment/solid waste load in stream The proposed civil works include: (i) replacement of the existing arrangement of small pipes with a larger capacity and wider Double cell 3x2 box culvert, (ii) construction of appropriate bed scour (upstream and downstream) and side protection to prevent outflanking and (iii) construction of formal roadway approaches and associated drainage (for the full width of the floodplain) with the minimum land area required for the proposed intervention estimated at about 225m2 Specifically, the design includes: a. Excavation and stabilization; b. Construction of bed and concrete screeding; c. Construction of 9� thick reinforced concrete retaining wall. (Abutments); d. Construction of deck concrete; and e. Construction of Parapet wall 95 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Plate 1: Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road (Ogunpa River) Schematic Layout 4.4.0 FOWOROGI BRIDGE – EGBEDA TUBA ROAD FOWOROGI (OGBERE RIVER) STUDY AREA: The culvert is located in the Ifesowapo Idi-osan community in Ibadan; a sub urban community in Oluyole Local Government area of Oyo State. The site falls within the Ibadan Metropolis and lies between x and y coordinates N7.33088 and E3.94549 at an altitude of 189msl. 4.4.1 RATIONALE OF THE FOWOROGI BRIDGE – EGBEDA TUBA ROAD STUDY The stream in Foworogi channels water from River Ariyo to Fatusi. Existing Culvert is constructed on an earth road used by vehicles (heavy and light) and pedestrians. Culvert is not adequate for the area. Waterway is obstructed by water weeds. The low crossing has suffered severe structural damage and is now actively eroding. The topography of the project area of influence is a gentle slope and characterized by basement formation and sandy soils. Vegetation in the area is composed mainly of some trees, high shrubs, and grasses. However, the original vegetation has been undergoing modifications due to urban expansions and human activities. Human activities have impacted on the environment resulting in series of environmental and social concerns such aquatic weeds restricting flow of water, high sediment load in stream and lack of drainages on existing earth roads. Site Pictures Roadway approaches; no drainages Structural damage actively eroding High sediment load in stream 96 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road The proposed civil works include: i. A 1x15m spans bridge (reflecting the width of the crossing). ii. Construction of appropriate bed scour (upstream and downstream) and iii. side protection to prevent outflanking will need to be provided. iv. It is likely that an extended length of road construction will be required to ensure the works improve the bridge to facilitate a reconnection of the communities (this could include approximately 250m of roadway either side of the crossing being repaired) and v. a simple river level gauge should also be installed upstream of the crossing with the minimum land area required for the proposed intervention estimated at about 1800m2. Specifically, the design includes: a. Excavation and stabilization; b. Construction of bed and concrete screeding; c. Construction of 9� thick reinforced concrete retaining wall (Abutments); d. Construction of deck concrete; and e. Construction of Parapet wall Plate 1: Foworogi Culvert – Egbeda Tuba Road Foworogi (Ogbere River) Schematic Layout 4.5.0 ELERE RIVER CULVERT-EGBEDA TUBA ROAD ELERE (OGEBRE RIVER) STUDY AREA: The culvert is located in the Idi Ogun community in Ibadan; a sub urban community in Oluyole Local Government area of Oyo State. The site falls within the Ibadan Metropolis and lies between x and y coordinates N7.32389 and E3.95092 at an altitude of 200msl. 4.5.1 RATIONALE OF THE ELERE RIVER CULVERT-EGBEDA TUBA ROAD (OGEBRE RIVER) STUDY Elere River flows through the Idi Ogun community into River Fatusi. The culvert which controls the flow of water is constructed on an untarred earth roadway used by heavy and light vehicles, and pedestrians. This culvert has been inadequately designed as it does not serve its purpose. It is a part of series of connecting bridges that serve multiple communities, and a large area of ongoing and rapid urban growth. The unmade roadway soon becomes impassable during the rains. The existing small temporary bridge can only cope with small vehicles which mean that larger Lorries and vans go through the river resulting in significant deepening of the stream and undermining of the current structure. 97 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road The topography is a gentle slope and characterized by basement geology formations and sandy soils in some parts. Vegetation in the area is composed basically of wetland/marshy tree species, high shrubs and grasses by the river banks downstream.However, the original vegetation has been undergoing modifications due to urban expansions and human activities. Human activities have impacted negatively on the environment resulting in series of environmental and social concerns such as aquatic weeds restricting flow of water, high sediment load in stream, and lack of drainages on existing earth roads. Earth road, make shift drainage forms the approach Inadequate single culvert The proposed civil works include: (i) replacement of the existing culvert with a larger capacity 2x15m (30meters) span bridge, (ii) construction of appropriate bed scour (upstream and downstream) and side protection to prevent outflanking, (iii) construction of formal roadway approaches and associated drainage (for the full width of the floodplain) and the minimum land area required for the proposed intervention is estimated at about 375m2 Specifically, the engineering design includes:  Piling;  Construction of pile caps;  Construction of piers; and  Construction of reinforced concrete retaining wall. 98 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Plate 1: Elere River Culvert – Egbeda Tuba Road. Elere (Ogbere River) Schematic Layout 4.6.0 ALARO CULVERT-7UP ROAD (ALARO RIVER) STUDY AREA: Alaro culvert is sited in a residential/industrial area on 7Up road in Ibadan South West Local Government Area. The site falls within the Ibadan Metropolis and lies between x and y coordinates N7.3541 and E3.84603 at an altitude of 162msl. 4.6.1 RATIONALE OF THE ALARO CULVERT-7UP ROAD (ALARO RIVER) STUDY: The existing culverts are undersized and capacity is further limited by frequent and severe debris. The complex nature of the upstream entrance to the culvert makes it easy for debris to collect and blind the entrance. Outflanking of the short training walls is also in evidence. There are no protective barriers on both sides of the culvert. Culvert is inadequate and needs to be replaced. Drainage also requires reconstruction. Blockage by natural and anthropogenic debris is a significant issue that further reduces the culvert capacity during times of flood. The topography is a flat and characterized by basement geology formations and sandy soils. Vegetation in the area is composed mainly of high shrubs and grasses. However, the original vegetation has been undergoing modifications due to urban expansions and human activities. Human activities have impacted on the environment resulting in series of environmental and social concerns such as Air pollution from Zartech poultry farm; Sheet erosion, debris blockage– including woody debris and anthropogenic waste. Upstream towards crossing Natural and anthropogenic debris The proposed civil works include: i) replacement of the existing culvert with a larger capacity double box culvert ii) construction of appropriate bed scour (upstream and downstream) and side protection to prevent outflanking, iii) reconstruction of roadway approaches and associated drainage (within the floodplain) (50m) and the minimum land area required for the proposed intervention is estimated at about 400m2 The culvert is to be designed to maximize its capacity without significantly raising the finished roadway level above existing levels (to avoid impeding more extreme flood flows). Specifically, the engineering design includes: a. Excavation and stabilization; b. Construction of bed and concrete screeding; c. Construction of 9� thick reinforced concrete retaining wall (Abutments); d. Construction of deck concrete; and e. Construction of Parapet wall 99 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Plate 1: Alaro Culvert-7Up Road (Alaro River) Schematic Layout 4.7.0 EBENEZERY CULVERT - ALAKIA-ISEBO (OMI RIVER) STUDY AREA: STUDY AREA: Ebenezery culvert is located in the Ebenezery/Isebo community in Egbeda Local Government Area and it is constructed to channel water from the Omi River. The Alakia – Isebo road is situated on the Airport road with the tendency of high flow of vehicular traffic. The site falls within the Ibadan Metropolis and lies between x and y coordinates N7.40841 and E3.97988at an altitude of 224msl. 4.7.1 RATIONALE OF THE EBENEZERY CULVERT - ALAKIA-ISEBO (OMI RIVER) STUDY The existing culvert is undersized and capacity is further limited by frequent and severe blockage from floodplain debris. The complex nature of the upstream entrance to the culvert makes it easy for debris to collect and blind the entrance. Outflanking of the short training walls is also in evidence. The topography is a flat and characterized by basement geology formations and sandy soils. Vegetation in the area is composed mainly of few trees, high shrubs and grasses. However, the original vegetation has been undergoing modifications due to urban expansions and human activities. Human activities have impacted on the environment resulting in series of environmental and social concerns such as aquatic weeds restricting flow of water, roadway approaches lack drainage and impassable during heavy rains, turbid surface water; debris blockage – including woody debris and anthropogenic waste. Structural damage to existing culvert Aquatic weeds restricting flow of water 100 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Turbid surface water; existing drainage Debris blockage as dump site The proposed civil works include: (i) reconstruction of the crossing using a double cell box culvert (ii) construction of appropriate bed scour (upstream and downstream) and side protection to prevent outflanking, (iii) reconstruction of roadway approaches and associated drainage (within the floodplain), and (iv) removable of aggressive weeds from upstream channel (then to be managed by the local community) and the minimum land area required for the proposed intervention is estimated at about 100m2 Specifically, the design includes: a. Excavation and stabilization; b. Construction of bed and concrete screeding; c. Construction of reinforced concrete retaining wall; d. Construction of deck concrete; and e. Construction of Parapet wall Plate 1: Ebenezery Culvert - Alakia-Isebo (Omi River) Schematic Layout 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS (ESIAs) From the study documents the assessment shall include the following;  Project site(s) including all project components;  Area beyond the project sites (s) which could potentially affect or be affected by the project (justification should be given on determination of the impact area). 5.1.0 OGBERE MORADEYO BRIDGE STUDY AREA: 101 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road The proposed bridge is located at Ogbere Moradeyo community in Ibadan; a sub urban community in Egbeda Local Government area of Oyo State. The site falls within the Ibadan Metropolis and lies between x and y coordinates N7.38169 and E3.937 at an altitude of 215msl. 5.1.1 RATIONALE OF THE OGBERE MORADEYO BRIDGE STUDY Ogbere is a residential locality with various communities. The Ogbere bridge which links these communities is in a terrible state of disrepair. The existing crossing was badly damaged following the flood event of 2011. It is now highly dangerous, but continues to be used by pedestrians and motorcycles. The existing crossing section is in poor condition leading to local flooding issue, including the flooding of property. The roadway that once connected two parts of the city suburbs is now impassable. Alternative routes do exist but these are much longer. The topography is predominantly flat with a basement geology formation. The soil is sandy and prone to erosion mostly by water. The area receives surface water (upstream) from Onipepeye stream and drains into Ogbere River Vegetation in the area is rain forest, however, the original vegetation has been undergoing modifications due to urban expansions and activities. Human activities have impacted on the environment resulting in series of environmental concerns such as flooding, erosion, undercutting of road approaches and improper solid and liquid waste management. Community intervention on the collapsed bridge Debris collects against a collapsed structure Aquatic weed; turbid surface water; solid waste disposal Motor bike and pedestrian congestion The proposed civil works include replacement with a 2x15m span bridge having in mind the principle of resilient design to ensure the bridge and roadway approaches recovery unaided or with minimum repair and the minimum land area required for the proposed intervention is about 2400m2 Specifically, the design includes:  Piling;  Construction of pile caps;  Construction of piers;  Construction of reinforced concrete retaining wall (abutments); and  Construction of superstructures including parapets, bridge bearings and expansion joints. 102 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Plate 1: Schematic diagram of Ogbere Moradeyo – Ogbere Moradeyo Road – (Ogbere River) 5.2.0 BELIEVERS STREAM-ODO-ONA ELEWE ROAD - ODO ONASTUDY AREA: The proposed bridge is located in Aba-adio/Aba-llepanu community at Oluyole Local Government area of Oyo State. The site falls within the Ibadan Metropolis and lies between x and y coordinates N7.33671 and E3.85919 and at an altitude of 150msl. 5.2.1 RATIONALE OF THE BELIEVERS STREAM-ODO-ONA ELEWE ROAD - ODO ONA STUDY A large bridge at Believers Stream-Odo-Ona Elewe Road - Odo Ona Bridge over Ona River is deteriorating rapidly and is now in a poor condition. Scour of the bed and flanks is an issue. The area is prone to significant flooding. The Ona River flows from Eleyele Dam through Aba-adio/Aba-Ilepanu community. Water flow is guided by inadequate bridge without side protective barriers. Bridge is sited on a damaged stretch of the road used by vehicles and pedestrians with high flow of traffic. The topography is a gentle slope and the soil is loamy in nature. The area receives surface water (upstream) from Ona River and drains into New Garage-Ogun River. Vegetation in the area is composed basically of tall crowned trees, mixed with thick undergrowth.However, the original vegetation has been undergoing modifications due to urban expansions and activities. Human activities have impacted on the environment resulting in series of environmental concerns such as improper solid waste disposal into surface water body as well as lack of drainages on existing earth road which causes localized flooding. View from downstream; aquatic weed/manmade Damaged road approach; improper solid waste debris restricting flow of water 103 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road The proposed civil works include replacement with a 3x15m span bridge having in mind the principle of resilient design to ensure the bridge and roadway approaches recovery unaided or with minimum repair and the minimum land area required for the proposed intervention is estimated at about 1800m2 Specifically, the design includes:  Piling;  Construction of pile caps;  Construction of piers;  Construction of reinforced concrete retaining wall (abutments); and  Construction of superstructures including parapets, bridge bearings and expansion joints. Plate 1: Believers Stream- Odo-Ona Elewe Road - Odo Ona Bridge Schematic Layout 5.3.0 ALARO POLY ROAD - SANGO-ELEYELE ROAD - POLY IJOKODO (ALARO STREAM)BRIDGE STUDY AREA: The proposed bridge is located at Alaro community in Ibadan North Local Government area of Oyo State. The site falls within the Ibadan Metropolis and lies between x and y coordinates N7.42656 and E3.88579 and at an altitude of 201msl. 5.3.1 RATIONALE OF THE ALARO POLY ROAD - SANGO-ELEYELE ROAD - POLY IJOKODO (ALARO STREAM)BRIDGE STUDY: The Alaro Poly is a major archery carrying significant traffic volume – including buses and heavy lorries. Scour of the bed and flanks is an issue. Following serve scour at the outlet of the culvert that passes under the road, and a general lowering of the downstream river bed, the large box section forming the culvert was left unsupported and collapsed. The road verge subsequently eroded and continues to erode, exposing and severing buried power and communication lines as well as placing road users at risk. Alaro stream controls the flow of water that discharges to Ona River. The culvert sits on the expanse of Sango/Ijokodo major road with high vehicular traffic. Also roads, culverts and drainages are badly damaged by erosion; public utilities pipelines (water and telecommunications) were observed. The topography is predominantly flat with a basement geology formation. The soil is clayey-loam and prone to erosion mostly by storm water. The area receives surface water (upstream) from Ogbere River and discharges into Ona River. Vegetation in the area is composed basically of sparse trees and high shrubs. However, the original vegetation has been undergoing modifications due to urban expansions and human activities. Human activities have impacted on the environment resulting 104 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road in series of environmental concerns such as Presence of undercutting in roads/ erosion; damaged drainages along asphalt paved road; exposed drinking water and telecom utilities. Undercutting of road; damaged drainage Exposed telecommunication/water utilities The proposed civil works include replacement of the collapsed box culvert with a 2 x15m (30meters) span bridge and new road construction having in mind the principle of resilient design to ensure the bridge and roadway approaches recovery unaided or with minimum repair and the minimum land area required for the proposed intervention is estimated at about 2500m2 Specifically, the design includes:  Piling;  Construction of pile caps;  Construction of piers;  Construction of reinforced concrete retaining wall; and  Construction of superstructures including parapets, bridge bearings and expansion joints.  Bush clearing;  Scarification;  Sub-grade preparation;  Earthworks; and  Construction of base course and asphalt layers. Plate 1: Alaro Poly Road - Sango-Eleyele Road - Poly Ijokodo (Alaro Stream) Bridge Schematic Layout 6.0 SCOPE OF WORK FOR PRIORITY SITES WITH ESIAs AND ESMPs. The consultant is expected to work in close collaboration with the engineering design consultants and Project Implementation Unit (PIU) safeguard team, and with other actors and consultants as directed by the PIU. In that respect the sequencing of the technical studies be very critical. The consultant will have to receive the draft technical studies in order to take into account the technical variants of the proposed activities and also in return, inform the technical design consultants of any major constraint that may arise due to the social and environmental situation on the ground. The consultant will visit the whole area as delimited in the given culvert stabilization design. The consultant will take into account the proposed civil engineering designs, vegetative land management measures and other activities aimed at reducing or managing runoff that would be carried out within the sub- watershed. The consultant will assess natural resources and infrastructures potentially affected during project implementation and operation and select the management strategies needed to ensure that environmental and social risks are appropriately mitigated. 105 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road The ESIA/ESMP report shall be presented in a concise format containing all studies, processes, analyses, tests and recommendations for the proposed intervention. The report shall focus on the findings, conclusions and any recommended actions, supported by summaries of the data collected and citations for any references used in interpreting those data. It should provide a description of the specialist studies undertaken and the report should include a bibliography, maps, photographs, diagrams and any other diagrammatic representation needed to facilitate understanding of the main text, detailed data should be presented in annexes or a separate volume. Unpublished documents used in the assessment should also be included or referenced in an appendix and the location of the originals of such documents indicated. 6.1.0 THE CORE TASKS FOR THE CONSULTANT These shall include:  Reviewing existing documentation of the IUFMP such as the ESMF and the PAD;  Review Environmental Assessment procedures of the World Bank safeguards policies especially Environmental Assessment (OP 4.01);  Describing the proposed project by providing a synthetic description of the project relevant components and presenting plans, maps, figures and tables;  Identifying the policy, legal and administrative framework relevant to the project.  Defining and justifying the project study area for the assessment of environmental and social impacts;  Describing and analysing the physical, biological and human environment conditions in the study area before project implementation. This analysis shall include the interrelations between environmental and social components and the importance that the society and local populations attach to these components, in order to identify the environmental and social components of high value or presenting a particular interest;  Presenting and analysing alternatives to the proposed pro ject, including the “without project� option, by identifying and comparing the alternatives on the basis of technical, economic, environmental and social criteria;  For the selected alternative, identifying and assessing potential importance of beneficial and adverse environmental and social, direct and indirect, short and long-term, temporary and permanent impacts, on the basis of a rigorous method;  Defining appropriate mitigation/enhancement measures to prevent, minimise, mitigate, or compensate for adverse impacts or to enhance the project environmental and social benefits, including responsibilities and associated costs;  Addressing potential cumulative effects taking into account other initiatives planned in the study area;  Developing an environmental and social monitoring program, including indicators, institutional responsibilities and associated costs;  As appropriate, preparing an environmental hazard plan including an analysis of the risk of accident, the identification of appropriate security measures and the development of a preliminary contingency plan;  Identifying institutional responsibilities and needs for capacity building if necessary to implement the recommendations of the environmental and social assessment;  Carrying out consultations with primary and secondary stakeholders in order to obtain their views on and preoccupations about the project. These consultations shall occur during the preparation of the Reports to identify key environmental and social issues and impacts, and after completion of the draft Reports to obtain comments from stakeholders on the proposed mitigation/enhancement measures; and  Preparing the ESMP and ESIA Reports according to the generic contents presented in Part A and B hereafter respectively. 6.1.1 The following socio-economic issues shall be addressed in the Reports (ESIA & ESMP):  Establish social baseline for pre project intervention  Determine the project’s social impacts on health and social well-being ; quality of the living environment; economic material well-being ;Family and community ; and gender relations  A summary of the impacted communities for the project: location, access, population (number, demographic and social characteristics); economy (employment rate, income distribution); services (types, capacity, and adequacy) and housing. Concern is the ability to provide work force, service new development and absorb and adjust to growth (worker/family). . The report should identify and assess the social impacts identified during the public consultation process and those that, based on consultant’s experience, are also likely to occur. In some instances the affected communities may not be aware of or be in a position to identify all the social impacts that may occur. However, this does not mean that they will not occur. In such cases the consultant should use his/her experience to identify additional social impacts that have not been raised by the public. A summary of the views of the population including vulnerable groups, determined through thoroughly documented discussions with local communities. These meetings and discussions must be documented and should show how issues and problems raised are or will be resolved 106 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road  Pay particular attention to the impacts of the project on vulnerable and marginalized individuals and groups ( including but not limited to mobility impaired individuals and groups and People Living with Disability)  Detail measures that will need to be taken to mitigate the negative social impacts identified and the procedures for their implementation;  Identifying key uncertainties and risks: Identify and communicate any key uncertainties and risks associated with the accuracy of the findings of the social assessment, as well as of the proposed project. Some sources of uncertainty and risk commonly associated with projects are linked to: (a) Lack of adequate information at the community level; (b) Creation of employment and business opportunities for members from the local, historically disadvantaged communities; (c) The influx of job seekers and construction workers to the area and the impact on services; etc.  Assess the impact of the construction on individuals and groups whose livelihoods are tied to the route/road (motor cycle taxi and tricycle operators etc.). As part of consultations, the ESMP should identify the potential negative impact on the livelihoods of these individuals and groups and propose appropriate mitigation measures  Assess potential impact of the project on property access and suggest measures to minimize the effects on property access  Information will be gathered from field surveys and secondary data sources (interviews, structured questionnaires, in- depth interviews and focus group discussions). 6.2.0 PART A: CONTENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN The ESMP report will include the following topics: 6.2.1 Preliminary pages Cover page Table of contents List of acronyms and their definitions Executive Summary 6.2.2 Chapter 1: Introduction  Description of the proposed intervention  Rationale for ESMP  Relevant Maps 6.2.3 Chapter 2: Institutional and Legal Framework for Environmental Management  Discussion of the World Bank safeguards policies triggered by IUFMP and the intervention Olorungunwa Culvert – Poat Area (Omi River) priority site.  Summary of relevant local and federal policy, legal, regulatory, and administrative frameworks 6.2.4 Chapter 3: Biophysical and Socio Economic Characteristics  Description of the area of influence and environmental baseline conditions  Analysis of existing livelihoods opportunities, income, gender characteristics, age profile, health, transport access, existing community structures. 6.2.5 Chapter 4: Institutional Assessment and framework for Environmental Management .  Highlight and define the roles, responsibilities and institutional arrangements for the implementation of the ESMP, as they are fundamental to the effective implementation of the environmental and social safeguard measures. 6.2.6 Chapter 5: Assessment of Potential Adverse Environmental and Social Impacts and Analysis of Alternatives  Methods and techniques used in assessing and analyzing the environmental and social impacts of the proposed project  Discussion of alternatives to the current project and reasons for their rejection, including short description of likely future scenario without intervention;  Discussion of the potentially significant adverse environmental and social impacts of the proposed project 6.2.7 Chapter 6: Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP), including:  The proposed mitigation measures;  Monitoring indicators; 107 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road  Institutional responsibilities for monitoring and implementation of mitigation;  Summarized table for ESMP including costs  ESMP Training requirements 6.2.8 Chapter 7: Consultation with Stakeholders  This chapter shall summarize the actions undertaken to consult the groups affected by the project, as well as other concerned key stakeholders including Civil Society Organizations. The detailed record of the consultation meetings shall be presented in annex to the ESMP. 6.2.9 Chapter 8: Summary and Recommendations 6.2.10 Annexes Annex 1: List of site contact. Annex 2: Summary of World Bank Safeguard Policies Annex 3: General Environmental Management Conditions for Constructions/Civil Works. Annex 4: References Annex 5: Photos 6.3.0 PART B: CONTENTS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT The typical contents of an ESIA Report are presented hereafter. It shall be noted that the presentation of the Report may be adapted pending on the nature and specific requirements of the priority sites. 6.3.1 Executive Summary This section shall present in a non-technical language a concise summary of the ESIA Report with a particular attention on the processes and procedures used; baseline conditions; the alternatives considered; mitigation/enhancement measures; monitoring program; consultations with stakeholders; capabilities of environmental and social units and actions to strengthen those capacities; and cost implications. This Executive Summary shall be written in English and a local language, if necessary for public consultations. 6.3.2 Introduction The Introduction shall indicate the purpose of the ESIA, present an overview of the proposed project to be assessed, as well as the project’s purpose and needs. This section identifies the project sponsor and the consultant assigned to carry out the ESIA. It shall also briefly mention the contents of the ESIA Report and the methods adopted to complete the assessment. 6.3.3 Policy, Legal and Administrative Framework This chapter concerns the policy, legal and administrative framework within which the ESIA is carried out. It presents the relevant environmental and social policies of the Bank and borrowing country, as well as the national legal requirements and related constraints (e.g. practices that may discriminate or exclude any stakeholder group) relevant to the project. It provides information on the environmental requirements of any co-financiers, and identifies relevant international environmental/social agreements to which the country is a signatory. 6.3.4 Project Description and Justification The first part of this chapter shall describe the proposed project and its geographic, ecological, social, economic and temporal context: project location, various project components, capacity, construction activities, facilities, staffing, working conditions, availability and source of raw materials, production methods, products, schedule of works, land tenure, land use system, potential beneficiaries, affected groups (directly and indirectly), and offsite investments that may be required. This section shall determine and characterise the anticipated liquid, solid and gaseous discharges from the processes, as well as the sources of nuisance such as noise, odours, visual nuisances, etc. It shall indicate the need for any resettlement plan or vulnerable group’s development plan. It shall at least include a map showing the project location and area of influence. The project justification should be based on combined economic, environmental and social assessments. To this end, this chapter shall describe the current situation in the sector, explain the problems or the needs to be satisfied by the project and present the constraints associated with the project implementation. Overall the description and justification of the project shall cover at least the following elements:  Spatial requirements (sites required for works). 108 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road  Project layout characteristics (including site location map).  Socio-cultural factors or constraints, such as customs and beliefs.  Natural and human resources requirements.  Temporary (during construction) and permanent infrastructures.  Existing and proposed location of human settlements and public services such as health centres and accident and emergency units.  Construction activities (land clearing, burning, excavation, blasting, extracting, filling, compacting, waterways crossing, use of heavy machinery, etc.).  Anticipated liquid, solid (including waste) and gaseous emissions, and sources of nuisances (at construction and operation stages).  Construction schedules and costs.  Maintenance works and associated costs.  Consultation approaches and participation mechanisms. 6.3.5 Description of the Project Environment This chapter shall first determine the limits of the study area that shall be defined in order to encompass all project direct and indirect impacts. The description and analysis of the physical, biological and human conditions shall address relevant environmental and social issues within this area, including any changes anticipated before project implementation. Within the human environment, key issues that shall be considered include population characteristics and trends, revenue disparities, gender differences, health problems, natural resource access and ownership, land use patterns and civil society organisation level. It shall also address the interrelations between the environmental and social components and the importance (value) that the society and local populations attach to these components, in order to identify the environmental and social components of high value or presenting a particular interest. A particular attention shall be given to the rare, threatened, sensitive or valorised environmental and social components. The information presented shall be relevant to decisions about project location, design, operations as well as environmental and social management. Maps, figures and tables shall be included in this chapter to better illustrate the various environmental and social components. 6.3.6 Project Alternatives This part of the ESIA Report consists in analysing the various feasible alternatives of the project, including the "without project" option. It normally comprises two sections. The first section identifies and describes the potential feasible alternatives that would allow reaching the project objectives. The second section presents a comparison of the potential alternatives on the basis of technical, economic, environmental and social criteria, as well as of public views and concerns. The alternative comparison shall address the proposed project site, technology, design, and operation, in terms of their potential environmental and social impacts and the feasibility of mitigating these impacts. For each of the alternatives, the environmental and social impacts shall be quantified as possible, including their economic values where feasible. The selected alternative shall be the most environmentally and socially sustainable, taking into account the technical and economical feasibility. 6.3.7 Potential Environmental and Social Impacts and Mitigation/Enhancement Measures This chapter presents a detailed analysis of beneficial and adverse impacts of various components of the selected project alternative on the physical, biological and human (social, cultural and economic) environments. The methodology of assessment, based on a rigorous scientific method, shall be first presented. Then all environmental and social, direct and indirect, short and long-term, temporary and permanent impacts shall be described and assessed, indicating their importance level and their probability of occurrence. The importance level may be assessed on the basis of the nature, extent, intensity and duration of the impact, as well as on the sensitivity of the concerned environmental and social components and perceptions of the public. Irreversible or unavoidable impacts shall be clearly identified. Cumulative effects shall also be addressed taking into account other projects or actions planned in the study area. Appropriate mitigation measures shall be identified to prevent, minimise, mitigate or compensate for adverse environmental and/or social impacts. Moreover, enhancement measures shall be developed in order to improve project environmental and social performance. Roles and responsibilities to implement measures shall be clearly defined. The cost of the measures shall be 109 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road estimated, including the cost for environmental and social capacity building and gender mainstreaming, if necessary. Residual impacts shall be presented. 6.3.8 Environmental Hazard Management Whenever relevant, this chapter shall describe the security measures and propose a preliminary contingency plan for the construction and operation phases of the project (possible contingency situations, major actions to properly react to accidents, responsibilities and means of communications). For projects that may cause major technological accidents whose consequences may exceed the project site, the ESIA shall include an analysis of the technological accident risk: identification of hazard and potential consequences, estimation of the consequences’ magnitude and frequency, and risk estimation and evaluation. 6.3.9 Environmental and Social Monitoring Program The first section of this chapter shall describe the surveillance measures aiming at ensuring that the proposed mitigation and enhancement measures are effectively implemented during the implementation phase. The second section concerns the environmental and social monitoring activities designed to measure and evaluate the project impacts on some key environmental and social components of concern and to implement remedial measures, if necessary. Indicators, roles and responsibilities shall be clearly defined. The cost of the program shall be estimated, including the cost for environmental and social capacity building if necessary. 6.3.10 Public Consultations This chapter shall summarise the actions undertaken to consult the groups affected by the project, as well as other concerned key stakeholders including Civil Society Organisations. The detailed record of the consultation meetings shall be presented in annex to the ESIA Report. 6.3.11 Summary and Recommendations The summary and recommendations shall specify the environmental and social acceptability of the project, taking into account the impacts and measures identified during the assessment process. It shall also identify any other condition or external requirement for ensuring the success of the project. 6.3.12 Annexes  Summary of World Bank Safeguard Policies  List of the professionals and organisations having contributed to the preparation of the ESIA Report.  List of consulted documents, including project-related reports.  Baseline data referred to in the Report.  Record of consultation meetings with primary and secondary stakeholders.  General Environmental Management Conditions for Constructions/Civil Works. The Environmental and Social Impact Assessment shall include, but not limited to the following:  Cover page  Table of Contents  List of Acronyms  Executive Summary  Introduction  General Information – Objectives and Justification of the Proposed Project  Description of the policy, legal, institutional and administrative framework  Description of the Proposed Project  Study of existing Environment  Description of the Project Alternatives  Public/ Stakeholder Consultations with relevant stakeholders  Identification & Assessment of potential environmental and social impacts  Mitigation measures  Environmental & Social Management Plan (ESMP)  Preparation of an Environmental & Social Management Monitoring Programme.  Compensation in respect of Acquisition of Right-of-Way  Final Environmental & Social Impact Assessment, Environmental & Social Management Plan and Resettlement & Compensation Plan.  Description of alternatives to the current project  Monitoring indicators for the proposed project  Conclusion and Recommendations 110 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road  References  Annexes o Annex 1: List of site contact. o Annex 2: Summary of World Bank safeguards policies o Annex 3: Records of NGOs/CBO Communications o Annex 4: Records of Consultations and List of Participants o Annex 5 :General Environmental Management Conditions Construction Contracts 7.0 PRIORITY SITES WITH ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (ARAP) These sites are itemized in bullets 2.3 above as; I. Alaro Poly Road – Sango – Eleyele Road (a-d) II. Omiri Culvert,Omiri; (Picture (e.) below III. Believers Stream Odo Ona Elewe and pictures (f-g) a.) b.) Affected business outfits/sources of livelihood c.) Affected public utility and gas vendor d.)Collapsed outlet fast eroding 111 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road e.) Affected kiosks along the drainage way f.) Affected house close to the damaged bridge g.)Potential affected road side vendors For projects that involve the displacement of 200 people or more, a full Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) is required. For projects that involve fewer than 200 people, an Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan (ARAP) is required. The aim of the ARAP is to identify and assess the human impact of the proposed works at the priority site as described above, and to prepare an Action Plan to be implemented in coordination with the civil works in line with World Bank Policy and Nigeria policies and laws. Experience has shown that involuntary resettlement can cause loss of income, assets, and community ties that, especially among the poor, can be essential for survival and well being. In extreme cases, involuntary resettlement can lead to the dissolution of families, impoverishments and health problems. The Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan will identify the project affected persons (PAPs), engage them in participatory discussions regarding the plan and formulating a plan of action to adequately compensate people for their losses. The Policy of the World Bank is to ensure that persons involuntarily resettled caused by the taking of land in the context of a project supported by the Bank, have an opportunity to restore or improve their level of living to at least the pre-project level. Project affected people should participate in the benefits of the project and they should be given options regarding how they restore or improve their previous level of living. In the IUFMP it is not sufficient for communities to passively accept project works and the impacts of these works. Rather they must be mobilized to contribute actively to project design and implementation and to maintain the works following implementation. This feature underscores the need for accurate analysis of local social organization. 7.1.0 Responsibility for the ARAP In preparing the ARAP, the consultant will: a) Review relevant Nigerian/Oyo State law and procedures regarding land taking and compensation as well as resettlement; b) Review Resettlement Plans prepared for other World Bank urban projects in Ibadan and Nigeria; c) Undertake a reconnaissance field survey in the sites/local government areas where sub-projects are proposed. d) Consult with appropriate ministries: Works, Environment, Women Affairs, Lands, etc. e) Consult with persons to be potentially affected by sub-projects works (consultation should look at gender division of labor, etc). 7.1.1 Steps to be taking by the consultant in Preparing an ARAP: i. Community engagement: This must begin from an early date and a relationship of trust must be formed between the 112 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road executing agency and the affected community in which both sides have an opportunity to air their views. In general, small neighbourhood meetings are preferable to large public audiences where there is a greater tendency for matters to be politicized and people tend to “grandstand� and posture rather than exchange information in an atmosphere of cooperation. ii. It is necessary that member of the PIU and the engineering firm that will design the works be present at these meetings. iii. Hopes and demands expressed by community members should be taken seriously and, if possible, incorporated into plans. iv. Identification of the perimeter within which people and land will be affected by displacement or land acquisition. For this purpose, maps, engineering drawings, satellite imagery are necessary. v. Complete census survey of all the families, businesses, public buildings, farms and other infrastructure located within the perimeter should be done. GIS technology is highly recommended for this purpose with all man-made features being geo-referenced. The use of hand held GPS device will facilitate establishing the coordinates of each property identified. The census includes data on age, gender, occupation, income, sources of livelihood of all persons who live on or derive a living from the area of land as well as information on houses, businesses and other structures in use in the affected area. vi. Each land parcel and structure should be numbered, geo-referenced, photographed, and described in detail. vii. Construction materials, roofing, and measurements should be noted in accordance with the standards in use in the particular state or federal standards. viii. All information should be kept in a single folder (physical or virtual) for easy retrieval and cross tabulation. ix. The use of a simple database manager is recommended such as Access or Foxpro. x. In Nigeria and Ibadan in particular, it is important to include such feature as family compounds, places of worship, schools, health posts, sports fields, burial grounds and places held sacred by local populations where applicable. Each structure included in the census should be valuated according to its replacement value in the local market (see below). xi. Because of the linear nature of streams, bridges, culverts and roads, it is important to identify existing features or aspects of the engineering design that could impact on communities. If land is taken for the purpose of flood control or drainage, there is likely to be an impact on communication within and among communities. Barriers to access caused by project works should be considered in the ARAP and, where necessary, mitigation plans should be included. 7.1.2 Socioeconomic Study: Based on the census, community meetings and other data collected in the field, a socioeconomic profile of the affected community should be prepared as part of the ARAP. Some of the topics that shall be included are:  Demographic structure of the community;  Leadership patterns and political process;  Family structure;  Services available in or near the community: schools, health facilities, credit facilities, religious organizations, government agencies;  Existing organizations (e.g. age grades, religious groups) and capacity for community action;  Conflicts and divisions (ethnic, religious, etc.) within the community or between communities;  Important local customs and festivals;  Educational Levels;  Permanence of the community;  Primary forms of livelihood;  Community attitudes towards flood control measures;  Relevant aspects of gender relations; women’s vs. men’s roles. The entire range of social characteristics shall be woven together by a sociologist or other social scientist to paint a coherent picture of how the community is likely to respond to change and how best to make community members active participants in the changes that must take place. 7.1.3 Development of the Resettlement Plan: Based on the census and socioeconomic study, a resettlement plan is designed. The primary issue is to ascertain the impact that the project will have on livelihoods. This applies not only to land owners but also land users, such as tenant farmers, renters, businesses, kiosks and the like. The impact may range from nil to virtually destroying the livelihood of persons who depend heavily on the land for income. The design for the project and the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) shall take account of social organization and propose entry points, communication techniques, incentives and other necessary features of project design that will ensure active community participation before, during and after implementation. Where people actually occupy the land, the impact of the project may fall on housing, businesses, public infrastructure and other structures. 113 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road 7.1.4 Mitigation Measures: Resettlement is about finding adequate ways of compensating people for loss of place of business or farmland. However the task does not end with relocation. Perhaps the single most important feature of post-resettlement rehabilitation is the restoration of livelihoods. In some cases, livelihoods are not affected and people are able to continue in their chosen economic activities as before with no loss of income. In other cases, however, loss of farmland, residence or business clientele can create a spiral leading to impoverishment. In such cases, the Resettlement Plan can include specific measures to restore or improve livelihoods. Mitigation of resettlement can take various forms. When affected people depend primarily on land for their livelihood, Bank Policy strongly recommends offering land in compensation for lost land so that the land-based economy can be maintained. In some cases, cash compensation for lost assets is allowed, but only where there is a free and active market for land, housing or other lost assets. The Bank does not approve of compensation packages that lead people to squat illegally on public land or that sets them back deeper into poverty. Where poor people are involved, it is often necessary to provide special assistance to assure that people manage their compensation adequately. Other forms of compensation involve retraining people for other professions for which there is a demand. Special care should be taken with vulnerable people who lack social support necessary to allow them to restore their prior life style. Cash compensation may be used, but only under certain conditions. Cash compensation is acceptable only when there is an active market in land or other assets that people can acquire in order to restore their livelihoods. Works may not begin until resettled people have been adequately compensated according to the ARAP. Temporary resettlement is generally not acceptable, except in cases where the works require people to move away from their homes and lands and then allows them to return to the same places. Design of mitigation plans involves three tools: (a) asset valuation; (b) the definition of entitlements; and (c) an eligibility matrix. Entitlements are goods, services and sometimes cash made available to affected people to offset their losses caused by the taking of land. Note that business losses not caused by the taking of land are not covered by this policy. 7.1.5 Valuation of Assets: Assets that will be lost such as land, homes, fencing, un-harvested crops, permanent crops such as fruit trees, shops etc. should be valued at replacement cost that is the current cost of replacing the asset with a similar asset on the open market. Depreciation is not to be considered in valuing assets. Many states maintain a standard table of values for homes, land, crops, etc for expropriation purposes, but these tables are often out of date and do not reflect actual prices practiced on the market. It may be necessary to conduct a new survey using up-to-date information. Tax records in which the landowner declares the value of his/her land are notoriously inaccurate because landowners frequently understate the value of their homes or land in order to reduce their tax bills. The purpose of valuation is to make it possible for the affected party to acquire new assets that will be equivalent to or better than the assets lost. Depreciation is not to be considered in this survey. Various methods can be used to estimate the value of property such as data on land transactions made within the past year or two, construction costs, estimates by real-estate professionals, and others. The goal is to determine the replacement value of each affected structure for the purpose of compensation. 7.1.6 Definition of entitlements: Entitlements are goods and services provided to offset losses caused by expropriation of land, houses, farm buildings, shops, etc. Entitlements are intended to offset the losses incurred by people when land is expropriated for project purposes so they should be roughly equal in value. There are some exceptions, however. Entitlements are sometime set at a minimum level to allow people to be resettled without a significant loss of living style. This is often the case with squatters who have lived in place for a long time but who lack legal title to the land they occupy. Entitlements may consist of land, land with improvements (e.g. irrigation), new housing, building materials to build houses, cash payments, training for a new profession, especially where it is not possible to continue in a previous activity because of the resettlement. 7.1.7 Eligibility Matrix: The eligibility matrix matches categories of affected people with specific entitlements or a selection of entitlements. For example, farmers who lose up to one-half of their land may be eligible to receive plot of land equivalent to the land lost or cash compensation for the portion lost. On the other hand, farmers who lose a large portion of their land may be entitled to a new lot equivalent to the entire plot they farmed previously or to cash compensation. The reason is that when a large portion of a farm is taken, it may lose its economic viability and the farmer may opt to be compensated for the entire farm. The eligibility matrix must be crafted carefully to satisfy the needs of the displaced families and the available financial envelope. There is no one-size- fits-all eligibility matrix. Rather the matrix must be worked out in consultation with the community and in accordance with availability of resources. In some cases, for example, land may be so scarce that it will be impossible to provide land-for-land. 7.1.8 Cut – off Date: A cut-off date shall be set and announced to the affected community. Usually the cut-off date corresponds to the date of completion of the census. After this date, no compensation will be made to families or persons who install themselves within the affected area or for improvements made to homes or other structures. The purpose of the cut-off date is to avoid speculative 114 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road investments inside the affected area by persons seeking entitlements. If two years or more pass after the declaration of a cut-off date, the census must be repeated and new valuations computed for assets. 7.1.9 Businesses: Businesses and service establishments may be displaced by flood control projects. In such cases, business owners may be compensated with cash, with a new place of business or other benefits. Service providers, such as auto repair shops should be provided with a building site in a location where they will be able to attract customers or keep existing ones. Business owners are entitled to compensation for lost profits during the time they are unable to operate due to displacement or while they rebuild their clientele. Small, informal businesses present a problem because they normally do not keep records nor do they pay taxes. In such cases, an estimate of profits may be based on daily turnover, on inventory or other methods of estimation. 7.1.10 Vulnerable People: The census shall be used to identify vulnerable people among the affected population. Vulnerable people shall be defined as elderly people who lack a social support network to assist them in moving to a new location; persons suffering from a mental or physical disability, single mothers of small children and very poor persons living below the poverty line. The entitlement table shall include this category as having special entitlements including personal assistance with moving, reestablishment of household, reestablishment of a social network and appropriate assistance from informal or formal sources. This role is normally played by social workers. 7.1.11 Conflicts and Clouded Titles: Sometimes it is not possible to compensate landowners and homeowners because of conflicting claims or unsettled estates. In cases, of inheritance, for example, where the heirs to a property cannot all be found, it may be necessary to deposit funds into an escrow account held by a reliable financial or government entity until all claims are settled. The proponent agency has an obligation to proactively assist the affected parties and claimants to settle their differences in a timely manner. In no case, is it acceptable for people to be evicted from their homes or farms without having made provisions for them to be re-housed and rehabilitated. 7.1.12 Public Facilities: Public facilities such as schools, houses of worship, sports facilities that are displaced or become inaccessible because of the taking of land should be rebuilt at project expense at a location and in a manner acceptable to the users of that facility. 7.1.13 Disclosure: After the resettlement plan has been developed, it must be disclosed in a manner that is accessible to the community and other interested parties in the language used by members of the community. Printed copies may be deposited at local agencies and posted on line. Prior to implementation, additional community meetings should be held to discuss the plan and how it will be implemented. 7.1.14 Implementation: Resettlement must be closely coordinated with construction. A timetable shall be included in the resettlement plan and compliance with this timetable shall be monitored. Deviations from the timetable shall be justified in monitoring reports. It is not acceptable for construction to begin with the demolition of homes or schools before appropriate measures have been taken to replace housing and other structures. If cash compensation is used, it must be paid before people are obliged to move. 7.1.15 Responsibilities and Accountabilities: The plan shall contain a matrix listing all entities (public and private) responsible for designing and implementing the resettlement plan. It shall include columns indicating the role of each agency, the resources allocated to it and the source of these resources and the legal instrument to be used to assure performance (e.g. contract, MOU, operating agreement). It is essential that the development of the plan include contact with the management of each agency and their agreement to perform their particular role in a timely fashion. For example, if land is allocated to displaced farmers, the local land registrar must agree to register each land parcel and issue the appropriate certificates of occupancy and land titles in a timely fashion. Such arrangements must not be left until after implementation has begun. 7.1.16 Financing: The Resettlement Plan shall include a detailed budget, a budget justification and a financing plan that shows the source of funding for the overall resettlement plan. Bank financing may be used to pay for studies, prepare resettlement plans, and to pay salaries to social workers and other staff needed to work with the population. Where entitlements include the construction of new housing or infrastructure, loan funds can be used for site preparation, design, and construction. The same procurement rules that apply to other project activities apply to resettlement activities. Solutions that involve environmental impacts such as clearing forested land for new farmland and other activities with significant should be subjected to environmental impact assessments. 115 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road Loan funds may not be used for land acquisition or for cash compensation. These costs shall be paid out of local counterpart funds. The costs of resettlement shall be included in the overall project costs. 7.1.17 Grievance Procedure: Each Resettlement plan shall include clear procedures for filing and resolving grievances from the affected population. Grievance procedures fall into the following steps. a. Reception and registration: Affected people shall have the right to file complaints or grievances with regard to any aspect of the resettlement project. They may do so verbally, in writing or through a representative. Grievances shall be recorded by the implementing agency with the name of the griever, address and location information, the nature of the grievance and the resolution desired. Receipt of grievances shall be acknowledged within 48 hours of receipt by an official authorized to receive grievances b. Resolution: All grievances shall be referred to the appropriate party for resolution and shall be resolved within 15 days after receipt. If additional information is needed, project management can authorize and additional 15 days for resolution. Results of grievances shall be disclosed to the griever in writing with an explanation of the basis of the decision. c. Appeals: Grievers dissatisfied with the response to their grievance may file an appeal. In such cases, the responsible authority shall assemble a committee to hear cases including at least one disinterested party from outside the company or agency responsible for the resettlement project. There will be no further redress available outside the resettlement project. In such cases, grievances would need to be pursued through the legal system. d. Monitoring: During project implementation and for at least 3 months following the conclusion of the project, monthly reports will be prepared by the responsible agency regarding the number and nature of grievances filed and made available to project management and included in the trimester reports by the PIU. 7.1.18 Monitoring and Evaluation: The Resettlement Plan must include a timetable and performance indicators. Among the indicators shall be: o Meetings held with community (date, attendees, topics discussed); o Date of conclusion of census and Announcement of Cutoff Date; o Presentation of Plan to World Bank through PIU; o Date of Presentation of Plan to Community and Posting; o Date of first compensation (e.g. moving families to new housing); o Date of midpoint in project implementation; and o Date at which last family or business leaves the affected area Monthly monitoring reports shall be filed by the agency or company carrying out the resettlement plan referring to these dates. After project implementation at the time by which all families and businesses shall have been resettled and compensated and rehabilitation measures carried out, an evaluation shall be carried out using evaluation reports and interviews with the resettled families, farmers and businesses. While satisfaction of the resettled families is an important factor, it can be expected that many people will be dissatisfied with having had to move at all. The most important feature of resettlement is the extent to which resettled people have had the opportunity to rebuild their livelihoods at a level similar to or better than the pre-project level. Surveys that examine the satisfaction of people with the resettlement they underwent are not usually helpful. 7.2.0 STAFF REQUIREMENTS 7.2.1 Qualifications and team composition: The consultant should mobilize a team of key experts as follows: It is highly desirable that the consultant have experience with working with international development institutions like the World Bank, and on infrastructure related projects. 7.2.2 Key expert 1:Team Leader;  Team Leader, with a strong background in Environmental Management and proven experience in preparation of Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (ESIAs)/Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMPs).  Must hold a Master Degree in Environmental related courses;  Must have at least 15 years of general professional experience in practical safeguards, social and environmental management with demonstrated proficiency in the preparation, review, and approval of EAs/ESIAs/ESMPs to meet World Bank standards.  Familiarity with the community and environment slated for intervention will be an added advantage.  Experience with, and a professional/technical background appropriate for understanding both the environmental and social management implications of flood risk intervention projects, especially in urban areas, including their design, construction, operation and monitoring.  Excellent analytical, communication and writing skills. 116 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road 7.2.3 Key expert 2: Social Specialist;  Social Specialist with a degree in related social sciences and at least 8 years of professional experience in social impact assessments, involuntary resettlement and other relevant field. It is highly desirable that the specialist/consultant have experience with working with international development institutions like the World Bank, and on infrastructure related projects. Knowledge about World Bank safeguard policies and experience in similar operation is vital.  The specialist will have substantial experience with socio-economic assessments, preferably in the context of social assessments related to establishment of Community Development Funds, development of social management plans, stakeholder engagement and community development projects, preferably with private sector projects.  S/he should be experienced in the collection and analysis of socio-economic data and preferably have experience with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) programs. 7.2.4 Key expert 3: Biologist/biodiversity specialist;  A biologist/biodiversity specialist with at least 8 years of experience and degree in Biology or related university degree.  Extensive knowledge of local species of fauna and flora and previous work experience in the community area will be an advantage. 7.2.5 Other Experts; Other experts will be needed to support the work of the key experts, experts in the field of air quality and noise modeling etc. The consultants are free to develop a complete staffing for their proposal and working plan. 8.0 WORKING ARRANGEMENTS The Team Leader of the firm will report directly to the Project Coordinator of the PIU, IUFMP, Oyo State, Nigeria. 8.1.0 Deliverables and timing:  Inception report: The PIU shall double-check and ensure that the consultant has actually commenced work and that the consultant understands the tasks. The inception report shall be submitted Four weeks from the date of signing the contract.  Week 8: A draft ESMP, ESIA and ARAP Reports for the respective specific site will be submitted for comments in 8 weeks from the date of signing the contract. It will identify all the areas, the mitigation measures, and the environmental and social issues associated with the site intervention sub-projects, as well as the adequacy of the monitoring and institutional arrangements in the intervention site.  Week 10: The draft final ESMP, ESIA and ARAP Reports for the respective specific site will take into account all comments, and will be submitted to the PIU at the end of Ten weeks after commencement of contract.  Week 12: The Final ESMP, ESIA and ARAP Reports will be submitted to the PIU Twelve weeks after commencement of the consultancy.  The consultant will submit six (6) hard copies and a soft copy of the respective reports at each stage of the report for the specific sites. Activities Week 1 Week4 Week8 Week10 Week12 Contract Signing X Submission of Inception Reports X Submission of Draft Reports X Submission of Draft Final Reports X Submission of Final Reports X 8.2.0 Responsibilities of IUFMP  The Consultant shall report to the Project Coordinator of the Project Implementation Unit (PIU) of IUFMP.  The PIU would review and discuss the Inception report with the Consultant and necessary adjustment will be embarked upon.  The Consultant would especially carry the PIU along in the Stakeholders consultative forum.  The Consultant may seek Technical assistance from the PIU Specialists, especially the Safeguards Specialists of the PIU.  The Draft Reports and Draft Final Reports would be reviewed by the PIU and relevant MDAs.  In addition to the supervision and other responsibilities contained in the contract for this consultancy, the IUFMP shall provide the consultant with the following: o All relevant project instruments ; o Project Appraisal Document o Project Implementation Manual o World Bank safeguards policies; o Intervention design ; 117 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Of Maje River culvert – Maje - Idi Mango Road o Access to relevant officials, groups and communities 8.3.0 Payment Schedule 10% of Contract sum on submission of inception report 30 % of Contract sum on submission of Draft Report 40% of Contract sum on submission of Draft Final Report 20% of Contract sum of submission and Acceptance of Final Report 118