Report No. PID7969 Project Name Bosnia-Herzegovina-Education Development (@) Project Region Europe and Central Asia Region Sector Other Education Project ID BA58512 Borrower(s) STATE OF BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA Implementing Agency Address MINISTRY OF EDUCATION Project Coordination Unit (PCU) Federation Obala Maka Dizdara 2, Sarajevo, BiH Contact Person: Mr. Kerim Karabdic Tel: (387.71) 665.261 Fax: (387.71) 471.767 Email: Karabdic@Bih.Net.Ba Environment Category C Date PID Prepared April 14, 2000 Projected Appraisal Date November 29, 1999 Projected Board Date May 16, 2000 1. Country and Sector Background Main Sector Issues The major issues to be addressed in education can be usefully separated into two categories: those education issues which confront most other educational systems in Central and Eastern Europe - related only tangentially to the war and post-war politics - and those education issues which are unique to the post-conflict environment in BiH. Progress to date in addressing these issues is summarized in section 3 (strategic choices) below. Education issues in the first category include the following:n Teaching: nearly all the roughly 21,000 primary school teachers across the Federation and RS are in need of professional development to help them learn and adopt modern child centered teaching methodologies which were not part of the pre-service training curriculum in the former Yugoslavia. Similarly, any transition to less occupationally-specific secondary education programs will require the in-service training of the majority of the nearly 9,000 secondary teachers now in the system across the Federation and RS. While the problem of under-skilled teachers was considerably aggravated by the war -- in terms of a temporary reliance on teachers who did not possess the formal two year post-secondary teaching credential -- the need to modernize teaching and methodological approaches has been among the highest priorities in all CEE transition countries. Although there have been a number of donor-financed initiatives in various Cantons and schools, there is currently no strategy for focusing attention and resources on upgrading existing teacher skills in any systematic way. The situation in pre-service training is similar. Attention has been focused on re-building, staffing and equipping teacher training facilities, with little attention or funding being devoted to modernizing teaching methodologies and devoting more student time to practice teaching.n Curriculum: educational programs throughout BiH are characterized by a dense and ambitious body of knowledge to be learned, leaving little flexibility to focus on critical thinking and learning skills or to deal with children with varying capabilities. Despite dramatic changes in the skill needs of the labor force, what is learned in the schools and how it is learned is changing slowly, if at all. There is no standardized information on student performance at any level of the system which could be used to monitor progress in qualitative improvements or compare educational attainment within or outside BiH. RS authorities have made some progress in developing a strategy for restructuring learning objectives and developing educational performance standards, but the Federation still needs to begin this process. Although the need to develop new curriculum programs and standards is not directly related to the war, the processes of undertaking such reform has been greatly complicated by the post-conflict environment where the politics and language of the curriculum has taken center stage, particularly within the Federation, over the need to take a critical view of the strengths and weaknesses of exiting programs.n Secondary Technical/Vocational Education and Adult Training: approximately 70t of secondary students are enrolled in specialized programs which are expensive to operate - due to low student/teacher ratios and equipment needs - and externally inefficient - graduates are trained in narrow, often occupationally specific specialization for which there is questionable labor market demand. The secondary system in BiH is, thus, out of alignment with the emerging market economy's need for broad-based skills, labor flexibility and continuous learning. Little focus has been given in BiH, to date, to the need for transition in secondary education which will require the development of new broad-based programs and an extensive re-training program for the existing secondary teaching force. A reform of secondary technical/vocational education will also necessitate commensurate reforms in the field of adult training where occupationally specific training is more relevant. The goals are to develop a network of training suppliers (private-for-profit, public, semi-public, NGOs, etc.), to bring social and private sector partners into the governance of adult training, to complement Government funding with cost recovery, and to facilitate the availability of labor market information.n Higher Education: as elsewhere in Eastern and Central Europe, tertiary education in BiH is highly fragmented. Although five "universities" have been re-established following the war, the system contains roughly 70 component institutions each with a significant degree of autonomy. This fragmentation makes it exceeding difficult to pursue policy objectives aimed at allocating powers and responsibilities efficiently between the components of the system. There are no common standards for admission, tuition, staff recruiting or remuneration, and no mechanism to ensure commonality of academic standards. This fragmentation is even further complicated in the Federation by an uncertain governance and financing framework for higher education in which each Canton is responsible for higher education in its territory, although more than half the 10 Cantons do not have functioning universities. The need for a strategy aimed at developing academic and administrative standards and pursuing efficiency gains through consolidation is being promoted by Council of Europe, but has not yet been addressed adequately by local authorities, partially due to the messy post-conflict political and institutional environment.n Management Capacity and Information: as with higher education above, the governance and administration of general education is highly fragmented - each of the ten cantons is nominally responsible for education in its area - making - 2- policy and qualitative reforms difficult to coordinate. Detailed information on the system and its financing is not readily available and information that does exist is not used to support decision making in the sector. Moreover, there is no capacity for systematically evaluating student performance, and it is, therefore, difficult to assess the quality of teaching and learning. Ensuring the availability of reliable administrative, financial and performance information is a pre-requisite to beginning a productive dialogue on the need for education reform.In addition to these issues which BiH shares with the majority of its Central and Eastern European neighbors, there are two important issues which are unique to the post-conflict environment and pose particular constraints to education reform:fn Inefficient Governance and Financing Structures: the delegation of responsibilities for education to the cantons in the Bosnian Federation has proven to be a particular constraint to efficient public sector management and educational reform. Canton level ministries of education currently function as mini-centralized bureaucracies which suffer both the costs of over-centralization and the dis-economies of scale normally associated with decentralization. The cantons have made varying degrees of progress in developing and adopting education laws for each level of the system which mostly re-enforce an inefficient allocation of functional responsibilities. As a general proposition, the key to establishing an efficient distribution of responsibilities and functions among the various government levels -- Entity, Canton, municipality, school -- should be to assign to higher levels the responsibility for ensuring quality and consistency of educational programs, while ensuring that lower levels are given the responsibility and authority (including budget and expenditure authority) to implement programs within established norms. The roles of school boards and municipal governments in school management also remain to be determined. While the RS Ministry of Education retains responsibility for the prescribed quality control functions of a central ministry, the need to consider decentralization reforms which push decision making authority closer to the service providers applies equally in RS. As mentioned above, higher education fragmentation is not unique to BiH's education governance structure, but the nominal responsibility of the Cantons for tertiary education in their areas further complicates efforts to develop consensus on needed reforms.n Nationalist Politics and Language Separation: Decision making in BiH's education sector is dominated by the politics of post conflict resolution. A rational allocation of various functions, such as performance evaluation and quality control, to the central level is not currently possible due to the desire to maintain educational separation within constituent groups. To further complicate matters, nationalistic efforts to differentiate the common language of BiH into three separate languages has become an excuse for lack of cooperation in developing new curricula, textbooks and educational materials. This politically forced separation in education is detrimental in terms of long term nation-building efforts in BiH, the need for a rational distribution of functions, and the efficient use of resources (class size, facilities utilization and procuring books and other educational materials, etc.) The lack of cooperation is also a dis-incentive for funding agencies which would like to fund educational reforms, but are reluctant to do so in the context of efforts to re-enforce segregation in the schools.Government Strategy Following the end of hostilities, the education system has gradually been re-built and - while not achieving levels of funding and organization that existed prior to the war - teaching and learning at all -3- levels is now being carried out at minimally acceptable standards in most areas of BiH. However, the level of destruction of the education system has caused political and educational leaders and the donor community to focus their attention on physical re-construction of the system over the past three years, postponing and, to some extent, ignoring needed educational reforms which have been ongoing for 4-6 years in many other countries throughout Eastern and Central Europe. The multitude of donor funding opportunities for re-construction and the chaotic post-conflict environment also contributed to re-enforcing old structures and attitudes - such as inadequate methodological training of teachers, occupationally specific training at the secondary level, and the fragmented higher education system - rather than influencing authorities to re-think structures and approaches in the context of the education system's role in economic transition. Education authorities in the Federation and RS are not currently in a position to prepare a coherent and well-justified medium term education development strategy. In addition to the over-emphasis on physical reconstruction mentioned above, strategy development has been hindered by a lack of reliable information and basic analysis of public resource needs -- the type of information and analysis this project is aimed at producing. In the Federation, strategy development has been equally hindered by decentralization of education responsibility to ten Cantons and by the failure of the Federation's two main constituent groups to cooperate on educational matters. The RS Ministry of Education produced an Education Strategy in 1998 which sets out broad priorities for improving educational quality, but does not adequately place education in its broader socio-economic context -- in terms of minority rights and the changing demand for labor market skills -- and does not adequately address the financial, institutional and capacity constraints to achieving its qualitative goals. In the absence of an agreed strategy, the Bank and the Council of Europe joined together to undertake an Education Governance and Finance Review (November 1999, Council of Europe/World Bank) which provides the framework and recommendations for a preliminary medium term education strategy. Given that education is a canton responsibility in the Federation, the ten Cantons and RS were the principal counterparts for this initiative. The main theme of the Education Governance and Finance Review is the need to support common "intermediary institutions" and shared management mechanisms that will allow all three constituent groups in BiH to cooperate and coordinate their efforts on a professional basis in education. (Intermediary institutions are public or semi-public agencies, associations, councils, etc. which are created to focus on professional topics or coordination and which are complementary to the work of politically appointed line ministries.) The rationale behind this focus on professional intermediary institutions and shared management mechanisms is to focus attention on professionalism in education and the compatibility of educational achievement and public sector management of education with standards and institutional innovations in Western Europe -- a goal that all three constituent groups share. This strategy should be viewed in parallel with the need to reduce focus, in the short term, on the intractable questions associated with the political control of education resources and content, which are becoming more entrenched as a result of efforts on the part of donors and some progressive internal actors to force cooperation. In the absence of intermediary institutions and information collection mechanisms, it will be impossible to constructively promote cooperation and coordination and prevent an - 4 - increasing entrenchment of parallel institutions. A second and related theme of the Education Governance and Finance Review is the need to develop a modern public sector knowledge base in education, which is, in fact, often the role of professional intermediary institutions in OECD countries. The development of reliable and standardized public information on educational inputs, outputs and outcomes (student achievement and system performance) would provide the baseline for objectivity in the public debate over education and gradually help change the public dialogue in education from one focused almost exclusively on politics to one focused on the quality of teaching and learning and how extremely scarce public resources can best be allocated to ensure the achievement of educational standards compatible with those in Western Europe. Such formation would also eventually permit compatible policy and strategy development across the three main constituent groups in BiH. Regarding the long term strategy for education governance and financing in BiH, the report recommends a decentralization of administrative and political control over educational inputs (teachers, books, curriculum, financing, etc.) to schools or municipalities. Decentralization of control over education (which does not now exist in the highly centralized cantons and RS) is compatible with the desire on the part of the constituent groups to promote locally-based content -- a desirable goal in education -- and is compatible with the heritage of decentralized control of education administration in the former Yugoslavia. However, effective and equitable decentralization in education should be complemented with the development of capacity at central levels to measure system performance, undertake quality control, and establish policies and guidelines for the system. Given the unique education governance constraints of BiH, which are not conducive to centrally-driven reforms, the path to effective decentralization is twofold: first, a reliance on piloted, learning-oriented reform initiatives in BiH's 11 independent administrative areas (10 cantons and RS); and, second, a reliance on intermediary institutions to undertake performance monitoring and quality assurance functions in the short term, while setting the groundwork for strategy development, coordinated reform and consensus building in the long term. Finally, also in keeping with the study's recommendations to stimulate an environment for decentralization, there is a crucial need in the short term to develop a mechanism to provide direct support to schools and teachers, which are starved in the current under-funded environment for the small amounts of non-salary recurrent funding that allow and motivate creativity and innovation among teachers. In addition to the direct and immediate benefits associated with making more learning resources available to teachers and schools, school-based funding and learning initiatives will set the ground work for increased school and community level control of education. Given the strong political resistance at central levels to integrating education across constituent groups, empowering schools and local communities to take control of their own educational delivery will play an important part in the reform of education governance in the future. The Education Governance and Finance Review was prepared in close consultation with the principal education donor partners (Office of the High Representative, UNESCO, Council of Europe, World Bank) among which there is general consensus and support for the conclusions and strategic recommendations of the report. Coverage in the SoSAC The Social Sector Adjustment Credit (FY00) will focus on social protection and labor issues, for which the Living Standards Measurement Survey, financed under the project, is expected to produce key poverty and - 5 - expenditure data. A second Social Sector Adjustment Credit is expected to begin preparation in FY01 which should address finance and equity issues in education, focusing principally on higher education. Information produced under this investment operation will be key to preparation of the second adjustment operation. 2. Objectives The project has the following three broad objectives:to mobilize the professional capacity of teachers to improve the teaching and learning processes in schools, and as a result improve the quality of education being offered to primary school children in BiH.to promote the efficient and equitable use of scarce public resources for education in BiH by providing public policy makers and decision makers with management tools and information necessary to measure inputs, outputs and outcomes in the education system.to promote cooperation and coordination across the three main constituent groups in an effort to reduce inefficient resource use and build a professional basis for stakeholder dialogue in education throughout BiH 3. Rationale for Bank's Involvement Continued Bank financing for the education sector in Bosnia will promote the following objectives: (1) the establishment of intermediary institutions and management mechanisms in education will allow cooperation and coordination, which will lead to sustained nation building and more efficient and equitable management of education throughout BiH;(2) the creation of standardized and reliable information on system inputs, outputs and outcomes will help, over time, transform the public debate in education from one focused only on politics to one that focuses on system performance, student achievement and the efficient use of public resources;(3) the amount of IDA funding and the coordination required to access these funds will continue to provide a significant incentive for communication and cooperation within the Federation and between the Federation and RS; (4) the Bank's strong partnership with the Federation and RS Ministries of Education, developed in the context of our responsive reconstruction support, will allow us to move expeditiously and address comprehensive issues in an environment of trust; and (5) the Bank's support will continue to help mobilize and coordinate support for education from other donors, including the $1.9 million in parallel and co-financing allocated to this project by the EC and the Government of Italy.(6) Financing for an LSMS will allow the government of BiH to meet new IMF/IDA requirements to prepare a Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper by providing the first reliable data on household welfare across the entire country. 4. Description The following project components have been prepared and will be appraised:A Quality Fund (US$ 3.7 million) - this component will provide financing for non-salary incentives to primary schools and primary school teachers with the aim of stimulating innovation and creativity at the school level. It also provides support for building capacity and stimulating innovation in teacher training institutions. A Quality Fund, in the amount of $3 million, will be established under a single governing Board, already appointed by the Federation Minister and Deputy Minister of Education, Science, Culture and Sports and the RS Minister of Education. The Board itself will contribute to the need for shared intermediary - 6 - institutions across the three main constituent groups in BiH. The Quality Fund will support three sub-components: school grants (ranging between US$2,000 and US$10,000) awarded on a competitive basis to finance educational improvement projects which will be designed by teachers in participating primary schools and aimed at improving their teaching practices (school grants are currently being piloted in the Herzegovina-Neretva Canton and RS under Italian Trust Fund financing); teacher training grants and merit-based training scholarships to reward primary school teachers who are doing an exemplary job and to allow primary school teachers to engage in self-selected in-service training activities (contracts are expected to range between US$150 and US$200 -- no cash payments will be made to teachers); grants of about US$ 20,000 to support the strengthening of institutions that offer pre-service and in-service training for teachers. Awards to teacher training institutions will be selected among proposals presented by university faculties, pedagogical academies, NGOs and pedagogical institutes. A Standards and Assessment Agency (US$ 3.7 million) - this institution will provide information to the education community and the public at-large on student achievement and overall system performance with the aim of learning about the system's strengths and weaknesses, promoting accountability in public education and measuring compatibility between educational standards in BiH and the rest of Europe. The Agency will be a shared inter-Entity institution supplying high quality professional services in the field of student assessments. To achieve the above goals, the Agency's primary task will be to define performance standards (i.e. what students should know and be able to do in given subjects at given stages of their schooling) and to assess to what extent those standards are beginning reached across BiH. In particular, the Agency will:gather, process and publish quantitative and qualitative data about the levels of learning (performance outputs) at primary and secondary levels in order to inform the decision-making process;assist individual cantons or entities with their own assessment projects, where these are consistent with the overall aims of the Agency;provide a research and development facility to education institutions and individuals in respect of assessment issues;encourage and assist in the development of expertise in the field of assessment through training;seek to harmonize assessment practices in BiH with best practice elsewhere in Europe.In the longer term, depending on politically acceptability, the Agency could be asked to lead the work of establishing an Examinations Board. This would provide examinations for school leavers and award nationally and internationally recognized certificates of achievement. Any future role for the Agency in certificated examinations for BiH would be conditional on the unanimous approval of all representatives on the Agency's Board.The project will finance the capital costs of establishing the Agency, as well as initial recurrent expenditures on a declining basis over four years. The Entities will be expected to budget funds for the recurrent costs of supporting the Agency beginning in fiscal year 2001.An Education Management Information System (US$ 2.1 million) - this component will finance development of a BiH-wide EMIS that will enable improved sector management and compatibility of information among BiH's decentralized education systems. It will also test the viability of a per student budgeting model designed to promote increased efficiency and equity in education spending. Specifically, the project will support a process aimed at:determining core canton education statistical information needs at primary and secondary levels;developing computer software for data collection, collation and -7 - report generation as the initial module in an EMIS;assisting, at the canton and schools levels, the piloting of software, the upgrading of cantonal hardware, and training and monitoring;assisting, at the canton and school levels, the improvement of management capabilities through a pilot of capitation based bulk grant system; anddeveloping and financing implementation of an EMIS in all cantons in the Federation and the RS, and expanding the capitation based funding mechanism, where feasible.EMIS modules for education statistics and capitation funding will be piloted under the Second Emergency Education Rehabilitation Project. The design of the roll out to other cantons/RS will be based on the results of these pilots. Management training will be provided to stakeholders in the system at various levels (canton, school and school boards) during the roll out. A Higher Education Reform (US$ 3.5 million) -- this component is designed to stimulate professional coordination, innovation, strategic planning and efficient governance at both sector and institutional levels in higher education in BiH. Following creation of a Council of Higher Education, a secretariat will be established under the Council with terms of reference to focus on two objectives: 1) increased strategic planning and institutional consolidation and 2) improved qualification and accreditation systems. To provide incentives for strategic planning, a Higher Education Fund will be established in the amount of $2.0 million. The secretariat will be responsible for evaluating funding proposals and recommending approval of proposals to the Council. Universities, entities and cantons would be eligible to apply separately or jointly for Fund financing. Improved qualification and accreditation systems will be supported through provision of technical assistance and training to the secretariat and a representative working group of academics from BiH. The project will cover the costs of the Council and the secretariat on a declining basis. Precise criteria for evaluating Fund proposals and terms of reference for the accreditation work will be agreed at negotiations. A set of priorities on which the criteria will be based are presented in Annex 2.Disbursement under the Fund will be contingent on a decision to formally create the Council of Higher Education either via State level appointment or university level appointment of Council members. If such a Council has not been created prior to project negotiations, a condition of disbursements will be added for this component. Living Standards Measurement Survey (US$ 0.6 million) -- The goal of this component is to provide reliable data, for the entire country, on the levels and determinants of welfare, the causes of observed social sector outcomes and the incidence of public expenditures. Such data will be used to inform the policy-making process and are expected to improve the effectiveness and impact of public sector programs in the country. In addition, the data will form the basis of much of the analysis required for creating a Poverty Reduction Strategy for the country. The specific objectives of the component are to carry out a Living Standard Measurement Study Survey, create the capacity in the country to carry out such surveys and promote the use of such data through wide dissemination of the results, the various analyses of poverty, as well as the unit-record data sets. The three organizations in the country which are responsible for statistics (the Entity-level institutes of statistics in the Federation and the Republica Srpska and the State Agency for Statistics) will work closely together to design and implement an LSMS survey and disseminate both the results of the survey and the data sets. The entity level institutes will be responsible for the actual implementation of the survey while the state agency will help coordinate efforts and will be responsible for - 8 - creating the final country-level data set. Co-financing for this activity of US$500,000 will be provided by UNDP under a cost-sharing agreement, to which the Government of BiH will contribute IDA funding under this project. In addition, the LSMS survey is one element of a larger effort to support the creation of a system of household surveys in the country and will be able to take advantage of the other activities that are being undertaken. Project Coordinating Units (US$1.0 million) - the current PIUs in the Federation and RS, established to implement the first and second Emergency Education Reconstruction Projects, will be transformed into PCUs for each Entity. The Federation PCU will undertake a substantive modification in its composition in order to incorporate new staff with relevant profiles. The PCUs will be charged with managing contracting and expenditure under the project and coordinating project activities. They will be expected to share personnel support for coordinating the EMIS, Higher Education and Quality Fund components.The project will finance PCU staff salaries, as well as the basic operating expenditures of the PCU on a declining basis, including recurrent office expenditures, vehicle operation and maintenance costs, and travel and subsistence. A small equipment replenishment budget will be available, but the majority of equipment and vehicles needed under the project already exists in the current PIUs and will be made available for use by the new PCUs. 5. Financing Total ( US$m) Government 2.1 IBRD IDA 10.6 EUROPEAN COMMISSION 0.7 GOVERNMENT OF ITALY 1.2 Total Project Cost 14.6 6. Implementation The project is expected to be implemented over a period of four years. As with the first and second Emergency Education Reconstruction Projects, the Education Development Project will be designed and implemented in two parts, one for the Federation and one for RS. The respective Federation and RS Ministries of Education will be the implementing agencies for the project, although, in the Federation, Canton level Ministries of Education and their respective Pedagogical Institutes will participate in project implementation and be major beneficiaries of the project. The Federation and RS Education Project Implementation Units will be transformed into project coordination units to reflect the shift from reconstruction to education and institutional development objectives. These PCUs will be responsible for overall coordination, project management, financial management arrangements, disbursements and organizing procurement. Because the project will support common intermediary institutions and implementation mechanisms between the Federation and RS, communication, coordination and cooperation between the two project PCUs will be vital. Joint technical assistance contracting and joint training exercises were undertaken successfully under the ongoing project, and such inter-Entity cooperation is not expect to pose a problem for project implementation. For the LSMS, the PCUs will jointly manage a cost-sharing agreement with UNDP. The two entity-level statistical institutes and the state agency for statistics will participate in the project. Institutional and implementation arrangements by components are as follows:Quality Fund: The - 9- Federation Minister and Deputy Minister of Education, Science, Culture and Sports and the RS Minister of Education have nominated a Quality Fund Board for which terms of reference are included in the Project Operational Manual (POM). The Board will meet quarterly to approve project proposals to be financed under the Fund. The Board is supported by a single Fund Coordinator, to be shared between the Federation and RS, for which terms of reference are also included in the POM. The Fund Coordinator is responsible for organizing and coordinating all Fund activities including authorizing grant payments, guiding technical assistance and publicizing the Fund. The Fund approach -- beginning with the small school grants component -- is currently being piloted under Italian Trust Fund financing in the Mostar canton (East and West) and the Banja Luka Municipality of RS. Limited technical assistance will be contracted to assist in training required in the cantons and RS to take the Fund to scale throughout BiH and to conduct semi-annual quality and procurement evaluations of Fund performance and outcomes (see the POM for terms of reference). Limited funding will also be made available to conduct spot financial audits of grant implementation at the same time that the overall financial audit of the project is performed. The principal criterion for allocating funding across the 10 cantons and RS will be the official number of primary students enrolled in each canton and RS in the 1998-99 school year. The Government of Italy has agreed to provide about $1.2 million in Bank-managed co-financing to this component which will be used to cover techncial assistance and training, and to make a contribution to the Qulaity Fund.Standards and Assessment Agency: A Governing Board of the Standards and Assessment Agency, for which terms of reference are available in the POM, will be nominated by the Prime Ministers, including some international representation, the cost of which will be covered under the project. Once established, the Board will recruit the senior management of the Agency and senior management will recruit technical staff from throughout BiH (position descriptions for management and staff are available in the POM). The Board will also approve a technical assistance and training contracts, with assistance from the PCU, to support the operations of the Agency in its first four years (see the POM for terms of reference). The European Commission has agreed to provide parallel financing in the amnount of about $400,000 over the first two years of the project to cover techncial assistance and training expenditures. A memorandum of understanding will be prepared with the EC during negotiations. The Agency's Board will serve as the procurement evaluation committee for any IDA-financed TA contract outside EC funding in project years 3 and 4. The procurement of furniture and equipment will be coordinated by the PCU Director and Procurement Officer in cooperation with Agency management. Recurrent funding for the Agency will be budgeted as part of each Entity's annual operational budget on the basis of two thirds funding from the Federation and one third from RS.Education Management Information Systems: The Federation Minister and Deputy Minister of Education, Science, Culture and Sports and the RS Minister of Education have nominated a BiH-wide EMIS Committee for which terms of reference are included in the Project Operational Manual (POM). The Committee will oversee the results of the two modules to be piloted in the cantons and play a coordination and consensus building role in the design and implementation of the roll out of EMIS modules throughout BiH. The Committee will receive training under the pilots and be supported by technical assistance to help design and implement the roll out (see terms of reference in the POM). In addition, the the two PCUs will share a - 10 - single EMIS Coordinator who would play a substantive secretariat and liaison role for the Committee. If bi-lateral funding cannot be identified to provide technical assistance, the Committee will serve as the procurement evaluation committee for an IDA-financed TA contract. The procurement of servers, computers and other office equipment to support the EMIS in the cantons and RS will be coordinated by the Project Financial Manager and Procurement Officer in cooperation with the Committee. Higher Education Component: The Project will support the establishment of an intermediary coordination capacity in a newly created Council of Higher Education, and its Technical Secretariat. The Council would be responsible for recruiting local academics, on a full time but temporary basis, to staff the Technical Secretariat and, on a part time basis, to staff a representative working group for accreditation. The secretariat will be responsible for evaluating proposals against agreed criteria to be financed under the Higher Education Fund and recommending approval of proposals to the Council. The European Commission has agreed to provide parallel financing in the amnount of about $400,000 over the first two years of the project to cover techncial assistance and training expenditures. A memorandum of understanding will be prepared with the EC during negotiations. The Council will serve as the procurement evaluation committee for any IDA-financed TA contract outside EC funding in project years 3 and 4. Terms of reference for the technical assistance and criteria for allocation of Fund proposals will be agreed at negotiations and included in the POM.The Higher Education Fund will be managed by the Technical Secretariat of the Council for Higher Education. This Technical Unit will be supported for administrative matters only by the Higher Education Fund Coordinator to be shared by the Federation and RS PCUs. Terms of Reference for the Higher Education Fund Coordinator position are included in the POM. The main duties of the Secretarit will be: (i) based on agreed objectives, to prepare the Manual and Guidelines for the Institutional Strengthening Subprojects to guide the development of proposals to be presented by individual universities; (ii) to organize the evaluation and award process; (iii) to provide technical support for the preparation of the subprojects; (iv) to carry out supervision and monitoring of the subprojects; (v) to consolidate the individual progress reports periodically prepared by individual participating universities to be presented to the Government and the Bank. The Fund Coordinator will be responsible for: (i) carrying out the public dissemination campaign; (ii) preparing contracts with the winning universities; (iii) reviewing procurement procedures being carried out by individual universities to assure compliance with World Bank guidelines; (iv) issuing periodic payments on the basis of the contracts; (v) preparing semi-annual financial reports on the status of disbursements and commitments for both Entities; and (vi) providing relevant financial information to the annual financial auditors of the Project. Each winning university will implement its approved subproject following World Bank guidelines for procurement and disbursement of funds.Living Standards Measurement Survey: An inter-institutional committee, comprised of members of the two entity-level statistical institutes and the State Agency for Statistics, will be constituted and chaired by UNDP. This committee will form the base for technical and logistical coordination among the three statistical organizations. The main tasks of this committee will be to: (i) liase with a Data Users' Committee which is being formed as part of a larger efforts to support household surveys and the use of data in policy making; (ii) based on agreed objectives, develop the inputs required for the - 11 - design of the survey, develop terms of reference for technical assistance, approve all survey documents (questionnaires, manuals, field work methods) and ensure the creation of the final, country-level data set and its broad dissemination, as well as dissemination of analytic results. To facilitate the close coordination required for the successful completion of the activities under this component, a cost-sharing agreement will be entered into between the Government and UNDP, under which UNDP will provide US$500,000 in co-financing and the Government will contribute $600,000 in IDA funding. 7. Sustainability The following factors will influence the sustainability of the proposed project: (a) political stability and constituent group coopeeration: related to the likelihood of the constituent groups participating fully in intermediary institutions and shared management mechanisms (b) macroeconomic growth: related to capacity to adequately fund public education; a growth environment will also facilitate constituent group cooperation and coordination (c) government willingness to use information produced by the project to focus resource allocation on efficiency and equity issues (d) success in building capacity at all levels to monitor and evaluate sector performance 8. Lessons learned from past operations in the country/sector See Implementation Completion Report for the Emergency Education Reconstruction Project.Rapid reconstruction has medium term cost in terms of delayed policy and institutional reform. The ongoing focus on reconstruction and the unresolved uncertainty about government roles created under Dayton is hampering the restoration of an efficient and sustainable education system. It is also delaying key decisions about needed reforms in the structure, orientation, management, and financing of secondary and higher education. Better communication and coordination among donors and different levels of government is essential within the Federation and between Entities. Mechanisms to strengthen communications among all parties - particularly in the areas of shared educational standards, curriculum and educational materials -- deserve priority attention. However, compromises on the part of donors will be necessary in view of significant preferences on the part of beneficiaries (students, teachers, parents, etc. to differentiate language throughout BiH).Reconstruction in many areas cannot proceed effectively without progress in addressing key policy issues in the sector. Moving ahead on reconstruction in secondary and higher education will require policy decisions soon on the goals and content of these programs. Finally, it will take time before parties to the conflict accept the role education must play in promoting reconciliation. Although there are some promising initiatives in communication within the Federation and between the Federation and RS, these are ad hoc ventures at the moment. Continuing sensitivities on the language issue suggest that progress will be slow and uneven. 9. Program of Targeted Intervention (PTI) N 10. Environment Aspects (including any public consultation) Issues : No adverse environment effects are anticipated in this project that focuses on institutional development. - 12 - 11. Contact Point: Task Manager James A. Stevens The World Bank 1818 H Street, NW Washington D.C. 20433 Telephone: (202) 473-2848 12. For information on other project related documents contact: The InfoShop The World Bank 1818 H Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20433 Telephone: (202) 458-5454 Fax: (202) 522-1500 Web: http:// www.worldbank.org/infoshop Note: This is information on an evolving project. Certain components may not be necessarily included in the final project. Processed by the InfoShop week ending April 21, 2000. - 13 -