ICRR 10033 Report Number : ICRR10033 ICR Review Operations Evaluation Department 1. Project Data : OEDID: OEDID : C1940 Project ID : P009491 Project Name : Rural Roads and Markets Improvement and Management Project Country : Bangladesh Sector : Rural Roads L/C Number : C1940 Partners involved : KfW, SDC Prepared by : Binyam Reja, OEDST Reviewed by : Yves Albouy Group Manager : Roger H. Slade Date Posted : 04/22/1998 2. Project Objectives, Financing, Costs and Components : Objectives : i) promote rural development through the reconstruction, upgrading, and maintenance of feeder roads, growth center markets and the construction of structures on rural roads in the project area; ii) implement cost effective approaches to design, construction and maintenance of these components within resource constraints; iii) improve resource mobilization to support zila and upzila maintenance activities; iv) strengthen the institutions concerned with the development and maintenance of feeder and rural roads and markets; and v) rehabilitate roads and associated structure damaged by the 1987 floods while improving standards to minimize future flood damage. Components : (a) improving, maintaining, and upgrading 500 km of Type B feeder roads; (b) constructing bridges and culverts on about 650 km of rural roads; (c) master planning and improving infrastructures in 65 growth center markets; (d) providing project support in the form of consultants, project staff, vehicles and equipment, and office and laboratory facilities in the project area; (e) constructing a new headquarters building for Local Government Engineering Department; (f) repair about 650 km of flood-damage roads, and 27 km of bridges, culverts, drainage ditches and retaining walls in the area west of the Jamuna River . Costs : Total project cost : Appraisal US$ 98.3 million; Actual US$95 million. Credit amount: US$ 62.3 million, of which US$ 5.2 million is canceled. 3. Achievement of Relevant Objectives : The objective to promote rural development was substantially achieved . Physical targets set out in the SAR were achieved, in some cases, exceeded . The institutional development effort substantially increased the institutional capacity of the main organization involved in rural development, LGED . Financial objectives, however, were only partially achieved. 4. Significant Achievements : Significant achievements were made in : increasing rural mobility, reducing rural transport costs, improving marketing costs; and creating rural employment for the poor . 5. Significant Shortcomings : The project came short of developing sustainable flow of resources for Union Parishads to increase their share of funds needed to maintain infrastructures under their jurisdiction . 6. Ratings : ICR OED Review Reason for Disagreement /Comments Outcome : Satisfactory Satisfactory Institutional Dev .: Substantial Substantial Sustainability : Likely Likely Bank Performance : Satisfactory Satisfactory Borrower Perf .: Satisfactory Satisfactory Quality of ICR : Exemplary 7. Lessons of Broad Applicability : The key lessons from this project are (i) continuous local community participation at all stages of the project is essential for project success, and (ii) developing a sustainable local source of funding is a challenging undertaking and rarely achieved in the context of a project; it requires a broader intervention including changes in policy to increase the revenue base and decision making powers of local governments . 8. Audit Recommended? Yes No Why? This project has broad lessons for the Bank's effort in rural development and poverty alleviation, and its audit would make a good building block for a rural development or poverty study . 9. Comments on Quality of ICR : The ICR is exemplary, and covers all aspects project implementation and achievement of objectives .