IDA's Lending Commitments, Disbursements, and Funding in FY01 I. Introduction 1. The purpose of this note is to brief the Executive Directors on the sources and uses of IDA resources and the Interim Trust Fund (ITF) during FY011. The note is a requirement of the IDA12 Replenishment Agreement which calls for a report at the end of each fiscal year on commitments, disbursements, and funding. FY01 HIGHLIGHTS · New commitments were SDR 5.3 billion ($6.8 billion), significantly higher than SDR 3.2 billion in FY00 and the annual average of SDR 4.6 billion during the IDA11 period (FY97-99). Major increases in commitments were seen in Africa (Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Madagascar, and Uganda), Asia (Pakistan and Vietnam), and Latin America (Honduras). Overall, countries in the Africa Region received half of total IDA commitments, a share that is significantly higher than that achieved in recent years. · Two HIPC debt service grants, amounting to $101 million, were approved for Honduras and Cameroon under the enhanced HIPC Initiative. · Investment lending accounted for SDR 3.8 billion ($4.9 billion) of new commitments, compared with SDR 2.7 billion in FY00 and the average of SDR 3.7 billion during the IDA11 period. Adjustment lending increased to SDR 1.4 billion, compared with SDR 0.5 billion in FY00 and SDR 1.0 billion annual average for the IDA11 period, as a result of a number of large adjustment operations including two newly introduced PRSCs. · Lending to social sectors amounted to SDR 1.7 billion, compared with SDR 1.1 billion in FY00 and the average of SDR 1.4 billion during IDA11. Social sectors accounted for 43 percent of total investment lending. · Disbursements were $5.5 billion, higher than in FY00 ($5.2 billion) but below the annual average of $6.0 billion during the IDA11 period. About $2.2 billion of disbursements in FY01 went to Africa. 2. Seventy eight countries were eligible to borrow from IDA in FY01 (See Annex Table 1 for the list). Of these, 12 countries ("blends") had, in principle, access to IBRD loans, and 66 1 The ITF was established by IDA11 donors, except the United States, to supplement the resources available for IDA lending primarily in FY97. ITF funds have a separate legal and accounting status, but ITF credits are made on the same terms and conditions as those of IDA credits, except for applicable procurement restrictions and a separate approval process. The ITF was terminated with the approval of the Executive Directors on May 25 2001, after all the ITF credits have been approved and a significant portion of ITF funds have been disbursed. All commitment and disbursement information in this note refers to both IDA and ITF credits unless otherwise indicated. - 2 - countries ("IDA-only") had no access to IBRD loans. There were no changes in IDA-eligible countries nor in their status (blends and IDA-only) from FY00 to FY01. II. Commitments 3. IDA lending commitments amounted to SDR 5.3 billion ($6.8 billion) in FY01 (see Annex Table 2 for historical levels, and Annex Table 6 for country details). A total of 134 new operations were approved for 53 countries in FY01, compared with 126 operations totaling SDR 3.2 billion in FY00. The last operation financed by ITF resources was approved for Uganda (see Annex Table 7 for a list of operations). Major increases in IDA lending commitments were seen in Africa (Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Madagascar, and Uganda), Asia (Pakistan and Vietnam), and Latin America (Honduras). New lending commitments to Africa amounted to SDR 2.6 billion, an increase of 71 percent from FY00 and well above the annual average in IDA11 (SDR 1.6 billion). Lending to blend countries amounted to SDR 1.2 billion and accounted for 22 percent of total IDA lending commitments in FY01, compared to 27 percent in FY00 and 36 percent during the IDA11 period. This relative decline in lending to blend countries of total IDA is mainly due to the graduation of three countries (China, Egypt, and Equatorial Guinea) from IDA in FY99 and change of status from "blend" to "IDA-only" of four countries in the Europe and Central Asia region (Armenia, Georgia, Kyrgyz Republic, and Moldova) in FY00. Moreover, IDA approved two HIPC debt service grants for Honduras ($37 million) and Cameroon ($64 million) in FY01. 4. Consistent with IDA's allocation practices over the past several years, new lending in FY01 reflected an effort to direct resources to countries where the policy and institutional environment is most conducive for sustainable growth and poverty reduction. Borrowers in the top performance quintile received on average five times as much new IDA lending as borrowers in the lowest performance quintile (Table 1). Table 1: FY01 IDA Actual Lending Commitments by Quintile a/ Average IDA Lending 2000 IDA per capita Quintile Performance (SDR) Top 4.1 9.8 Upper 3.8 6.9 Middle 3.6 4.2 Lower 3.3 3.8 Lowest 1.9 2.1 Average 3.5 5.3 a/ Population weighted average for all active countries. Excludes inactive, blend, and post-conflict countries. 5. Investment lending commitments were SDR 3.8 billion in FY01, compared with SDR 2.7 billion in FY00 and SDR 3.7 billion average during the IDA11 period. From FY00 to FY01, investment lending increased in four regions including Africa (+65%), East Asia and Pacific - 3 - (+88%), Eastern Europe and Central Asia (+23%), and Latin America and the Caribbean (+171%). 6. Adjustment lending commitments were SDR 1.4 billion in FY01, accounting for about 27 percent of total lending, higher than 16 percent in FY00 and the average of about 20 percent for the IDA11 period. Among the large adjustment lending commitments in FY01 were (i) Poverty Reduction Support Credit (PRSC) operations in Uganda and Vietnam, (ii) an economic rehabilitation credit in Ethiopia for its post-conflict needs, and (iii) structural adjustment credits in Kenya and Pakistan. PRSCs were newly introduced in FY01 to help these countries implement their poverty reduction strategies described in their Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs). Countries in Africa obtained 49 percent of the total FY01 adjustment lending, followed by 24 percent for countries in South Asia. Chart 1: IDA Commitments by Instrument 6 5 4 Adjustment billion 3 Investment Total SDR 2 1 0 FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 Regional Distribution of Commitments 7. The Africa Region (AFR) continued to receive the largest share of IDA support both in absolute and relative terms (Chart 2).2 Its share of total lending reached 50 percent, above the share in FY00 and much higher than the share of 35 percent in IDA11. A total of 60 projects were approved in 27 countries in Africa, with commitments of SDR 2.6 billion well above the FY00 commitments of SDR 1.5 billion. Both Ethiopia and Eritrea became active borrowers in FY01 after the end of the conflict between the two countries. Ethiopia, the largest IDA borrower in FY01, received SDR 520 million mainly for its post-conflict needs, including an Emergency Recovery Project, an Emergency Demobilization and Reintegration Project, and an Economic Rehabilitation Support Credit, as well as gender, health, education, and agriculture projects. Eritrea received SDR 130 million for projects of emergency reconstruction, diseases control, and early childhood development. Other major borrowers included Kenya, Madagascar, and Uganda. In Kenya, SDR 266 million financed a health project (including HIV/AIDS components), economic and public sector reform, power supply, and regional trade facilitation projects. In Madagascar, SDR 207 million was approved for structural adjustment, a disaster relief social fund, community development, and rural development projects. In Uganda, 2Lending commitments for individual countries are shown in Annex Table 6. - 4 - SDR 277 million financed projects of utility sector reform, structural adjustment, HIV/AIDS control, agriculture, environment, regional trade facilitation and a PRSC. Chart 2: FY01 IDA Commitments by Region SAR 18% MNA 2% LCR Africa 7% 50% ECA 8% EAP 15% 8. In South Asia (SAR), lending was SDR 945 million in FY01, compared to SDR 873 million in FY00. In India, SDR 403 million financed programs of primary (Rajasthan) and technical (northern states) education, water supply and sanitation (Kerala), poverty alleviation (Madhya Pradesh District), leprosy elimination (nationwide), watershed development (Karnataka), and economic restructuring (SAL). After no lending in FY00 due to political instability and policy issues, Pakistan received SDR 295 million for a trade and transport facilitation project and a water management project, as well as a structural adjustment credit. In Bangladesh, SDR 218 million was approved for air quality management, HIV/AIDS prevention, microfinance, human development (post-literacy and continuing education), and capacity building (legal and judicial capacity) projects. 9. In East Asia and Pacific (EAP), commitments more than doubled from SDR 357 million in FY00 to SDR 781 million and were well above the annual average of SDR 625 million in IDA11. Vietnam was the second largest IDA borrower in FY01. Vietnam received SDR 493 million, which is a significant increase from SDR 210 million in FY00, consisting of projects in transport and flood protection, environmental sanitation, and rural infrastructure projects as well as a PRSC. Indonesia received SDR 165 million for health, environment, and education projects. 10. In Eastern Europe and Central Asia (ECA), IDA commitments reached SDR 417 million in FY01, nearly doubled from the level received in FY00 (SDR 231 million). The largest IDA borrower in the region continued to be Bosnia-Herzegovina, receiving SDR 96 million for projects of social sector adjustment, trade and transportation facilitation, power reconstruction, microfinance, privatization, and community development. - 5 - 11. In Middle East and North Africa (MNA), commitments were SDR 118 million, very close to SDR 119 million in FY00. The resources were committed for one project in Djibouti (education) and four projects in Yemen (irrigation, education, water supply and sanitation, and rural development). 12. In Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), lending tripled from SDR 122 million in FY00 to SDR 384 million. In Honduras, SDR 160 million financed projects for public sector management, transportation, agriculture, social protection, and education. In Nicaragua, SDR 142 million financed private sector development, transportation, public sector management, natural disaster vulnerability alleviation, and social protection. Lending to Bolivia was SDR 78 million, comprised of indigenous people development, public sector management, and health sector reform projects. 13. In FY01, a total of 25 countries received no IDA lending. These included six inactive countries: Afghanistan, Democratic Republic of Congo3, Liberia, Myanmar, Somalia, and Sudan. Among the remaining countries are those with relatively small lending programs which normally receive new commitments every other year or less frequently (such as some of the small island states) and countries with relatively poor policy performance or affected by conflict. Table 2: FY01 Top Ten IDA Borrowers Commitments (SDRm) ($m) Ethiopia 520 667 Vietnam 493 629 India 403 520 Pakistan 295 374 Uganda 277 358 Kenya 266 350 Bangladesh 218 280 Madagascar 207 268 Senegal 197 255 Indonesia 165 209 Sectoral Distribution of Commitments 14. Lending to social sectors amounted to SDR 1.7 billion in FY01, compared with SDR 1.1 billion in FY00 and the average of SDR 1.4 billion during IDA11. Among the large commitments by sector were SDR 955 million for economic policy, SDR 609 million for agriculture, SDR 512 million for public sector management, and SDR 425 million for transportation. Social sectors accounted for 43 percent of total investment lending in FY01, as compared to 39 percent in FY00 and 36 percent during the IDA11 period. Social sector investment lending continued to be important in the blend countries and represented 52 percent of their investment lending. 3During the second half of FY01, there was substantial non-lending assistance to DR Congo, to prepare a post- conflict recovery program. Financing for this program was approved by the Board in July 2001 (FY02). - 6 - Chart 3: Sectoral Distribution of IDA Commitments for Investment Projects Economywide Agriculture 13% 16% Industry/Finance 9% Infrastructure 19% Social Sector 43% III. Disbursements 15. In FY01, IDA's active portfolio of ongoing projects consisted of 797 operations. Disbursements reached $5.5 billion, an increase from $5.2 billion in FY00, but still significantly lower than the annual average of $6.0 billion during the IDA11 period (see Annex Table 5 for historical levels and Annex Table 6 for country details). Disbursements from investment operations were at $4.2 billion, about the same as in FY00 and 11 percent lower than the annual average for IDA11 (Chart 4). On the other hand, disbursements for adjustment lending increased to $1.3 billion compared to the annual average of $1.2 billion during the IDA11 period and $860 million in FY00. Disbursements from adjustment lending for Africa in FY01 increased by 83 percent compared to those in FY00. Pakistan was the largest IDA recipient of disbursements from adjustment lending in FY01. - 7 - Chart 4: IDA Disbursements by Lending Instrument 7 6 5 4 Adjustment billion Investment 3 US$ Total 2 1 0 FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 16. Undisbursed balances amounted to $20.4 billion in FY01, slightly lower than the level in FY00. The ratio of undisbursed balances to the commitment value of the portfolio was broadly consistent with the positive trend of the last six years, and was 55 percent in FY01 (Chart 5). Chart 5: Undisbursed Balances as Percentage of Project Percent Portfolio 80 70 60 50 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 17. The regional composition of disbursement is shown in Chart 6. Disbursements in Africa increased to $2.2 billion in FY01 from $1.8 billion in FY00 and occupied about 41 percent of the total. Disbursements are at high levels mainly in Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Uganda, and Zambia. South Asia received a disbursement of $1.9 billion, higher than the average annual disbursement during the IDA11 period and the level of FY00. Disbursements were $647 million in East Asia and Pacific, a level lower than last year's, because disbursements to China tapered off after it stopped borrowing from IDA at the end of FY99. Disbursements to countries in the ECA and LAC Regions were lower in FY01 than in FY00, reflecting in part the effects of winding up of - 8 - exceptional IDA support associated with the transition and post-conflict (several countries in ECA) and Hurricane Mitch (LAC). Chart 6: FY01 IDA Disbursements by Region LCR 4% AFR SAR 41% 35% MNA 2% EAP ECA 12% 6% Table 3: Top Ten Disbursement Recipients ($m) India 1,031 Pakistan 503 China 345 Bangladesh 298 Ethiopia 270 Ghana 197 Kenya 196 Uganda 167 Vietnam 160 Zambia 160 IV. Funding 18. Resources Committed: IDA lending in FY01 under the IDA12 commitment authority framework amounted to SDR 5.23 billion and was funded by: (a) SDR 4.81 billion from IDA12 donor contributions, a carry-over of SDR 82 million from IDA11 donor contributions, and SDR 36 million of special contributions from Spain and Turkey; and (b) SDR 301 million in internal resources4. The table below shows the breakdown of the sources and uses of IDA funding for 4Internal resources include reflows (principal repayments and service charges less administrative expenses), investment income, and any other resources (including foreign exchange gains/losses and residual resources from past replenishment) that become available to IDA during a replenishment period. - 9 - FY01. In addition to IDA lending under the IDA12 commitment authority framework, SDR 20 million was committed and funded by ITF donor resources ­ before the termination of the ITF which occurred on May 25, 2001 ­ bringing total IDA/ITF lending in FY01 to 5.25 billion. 19. Table 4 below shows the status of IDA's commitment authority as of the end of FY01. Table 4: IDA Commitment Authority as of June 30, 2001 SDR millions Resources Resources Made Resources Committed Resources Expected To Available To Date To Date Available for Become Commitment Available (1) (2) (3) (4) = (2) - (3) (FY00-FY02) FY00 FY01 Total FY00 FY01 Total Total IDA12 Donor Contributions 8,373 a/ 2,633 2,832 5,465 255 4,813 5,068 397 Internal Resources 5,920 5,841 17 5,858 2,987 301 3,288 c/ 2,570 IBRD Net Income Transfer 651 217 217 434 d/ - - - 434 Special Contributions 36 b/ 0 36 36 - 36 36 - Carryover of IDA11 Donor Contributions 91 91 0 91 - 82 82 9 Totals 15,071 8,782 3,102 11,884 3,241 5,232 8,473 3,410 a/ Valued at end-June exchange rates. Includes additional resources of SDR 493 million expected to be raised through accelerated encashments. b/ Represents contributions pledged by Spain and Turkey. c/ Includes five approved Fifth Dimension credits of SDR 26 million and one guarantee for Bangladesh for SDR 46 million (eq. to USD 60.9 million) in FY00 and six approved Fifth Dimension credits of SDR 17 million in FY01. d/ Represents the commitment authority corresponding to the approved transfer of $300 million from IBRD's FY99 and FY00 net income to be drawn down in FY05.