NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Key Lessons from the Pilot Program for Climate Resilience Shaping Climate Resilience for Transformational Change © 2015 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because The World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Citation: Rigaud, Kanta Kumari; Hoffer, Ronald; Ahmed, Kazi Fateha; Chaturvedi, Akshat; Gaensly, Laura; Kapila, Shaanti; Shrestha, Junu. 2015. Washington DC; World Bank. Any queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; e-mail: pubrights@worldbank.org. Cover photo: (Nepal/Climate Investment Funds) NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary 1 Purpose and Approach 2 PPCR Basics 3 Relevance 4 FAQ’s 1 High-Level Coordination across Multiple Sectors 6 Learning and Exchange 2 Assessing Vulnerability to Climate Risks and Hazards 7 Private Sector Engagement 3 Linking and Leveraging Investments 8 PPCR Early Lessons on Monitoring & Reporting 4 Transformational Investments and Policy Reforms 9 Responsive Country-Based Approach 5 Stakeholder Engagement 10 Nurturing Ownership in Regional Programs 1 Recognizing Constraints 2 What-to-do & What-to-avoid Summaries Click on Each Topic for 3 Sources More Information. 4 Acknowledgements Click here for information on how to use this presentation. # NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary 1 BACK arrow moves 4 NEXT arrow moves back one slide; forward one slide (back arrow on keyboard (forward arrow on keyboard also works.) also works.) 2 ‘NAV’ 5 SLIDE NUMBERS This is a comprehensive resource, with multiple Links to main Top right case studies for each lesson. One can access the presentation sections slides flexibly by using the navigation system. Underlined items are links. 3 COLOR 6 LINKS IN FOOTER Please see navigational information to left. Scheme Sub-navigation for Click here or below to return to the TOC. TABLE OF CONTENTS each section INTRODUCTION LESSONS Click here or below to proceed to the Introduction. SUMMARY Right footer area contains sub-navigation specific to each section 4 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 5 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Learn more Distill, sharpen, & frame for dissemination, lessons learned from the design and early implementation of the PPCR to demonstrate relevance to mobilizing climate resilience through existing, new, and emerging programs and instruments to initiate transformation at scale. Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 6 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Reviewed Teased out key Country Highlight Top 10 lessons and case material from lessons and sub- examples operational examples to mainstream evaluations, lessons extracted, and and practical climate resilience & documents and validated aspects influence transformation through through “what- at scale to-do” and interviews “what-to- avoid” Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 7 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Iterative process with Lessons, Action Steps Target Audience consultations and validation throughout. Top 10 Lessons Senior Decision Makers, Program Managers, From the PPCR Project Leaders Lessons can be Sub-Lessons Program Managers, Project Leaders added to and refined Country Case Studies Project Leaders What-to-do/avoid Project Leaders Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 8 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary “The PPCR business model has proven itself to be an effective framework for resilience Learn more planning and implementation. Its value will increase as development projects incorporate resilience in response to climate change and the relevance of these top 10 PPCR lessons has application for multiple audiences— countries, MDBs and climate financing entities like the GCF.” — James Close, Climate Group Director for Policy and Finance, World Bank Group Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 9 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Clean Technology Fund Strategic Climate Fund Finance scaled-up demonstration, deployment Targeted programs with dedicated funding and transfer of to pilot new approaches with low carbon technologies potential for scaling up Pilot Program Forest Investment Scaling Up Renewable for Climate Resilience Program Energy in Low Income (PPCR) Countries • Support country and regional development strategies Mainstream climate Reduce emissions from Create economic • Leverage financial products of Multilateral resilience into core deforestation and forest opportunities and Development Banks development planning degradation increase energy access • Stimulate private sector engagement through renewables ($1.2 billion) ($639 million) ($551 million) Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 10 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary The objective is to mainstream resilience into core development planning With a goal to support transformation through innovation at scale Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 11 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary PHASE 1: Preparation of Strategic • Pilot Countries Meeting─annually • Equal representation of contributor and Program for Climate Resilience & • CIF Partnership Forum─biannually recipient countries Investment Plan (SPCR) • For recipient countries─pilot countries • Annual Reporting on results at program level─baseline and targets rotate PHASE 2: Implementation of investments • Civil society and private sector with programmatic results reporting. observed groups Participating Countries (18) o Bangladesh; Bolivia; Cambodia; Mozambique; Nepal; Niger; Tajikistan; Yemen; Zambia o Caribbean Regional Program: Dominica; Grenada; Haiti; Jamaica; Saint Lucia; and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines o Pacific Regional Program: Papua New Guinea; Samoa; and Tonga 10 New Countries** o Approved in May 2015 o Bhutan, Ethiopia, Gambia, Honduras, Kyrgyzstan, Madagascar, Malawi, Philippines, Rwanda, Uganda Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 12 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Analytical work, TA & planning Phase 1 Knowledge & awareness Capacity building Formal Endorsement of Strategic Program by Governance Committee Initiation of specific investments Phase 2 Monitoring & Reporting of core indicators to track progress on resilience Sharing of lessons and results Phase 2 begins after endorsement of Strategic Program for Climate Resilience; but multiple activities and processes (analytical work, knowledge management, awareness raising and capacity building) have continued across the two phases. Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 13 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Original intention Evolution of Phase 1 into a “bridge mechanism” Phase 2 Implementation Phase 1— Phase 2— Preparatory. Implementation. Support for developing SPCR & readiness to absorb large-scale finanace Phase 1— Support for developing SPCR & readiness Long term vision; critical role of Phase 1, SPCR development Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 14 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary PPCR Countries Bangladesh, Bolivia, Cambodia, Mozambique, Nepal, Niger, Tajikistan, Yemen, Zambia, The Caribbean Region (Dominica, Grenada, Haiti, Jamaica, St. Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines), The Pacific Region (Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Tonga) 3.5 million 8,000 708, 000 People expected to benefit Farming families expected to benefit People expected to benefit From Bangladesh’s project to enhance climate From Mozambique’s Baixo Limpopo Irrigation and From Niger’s project to sustainably manage and resilience of coastal infrastructure in 12 rural districts, Climate Resilience Project, supported by $15.8 control water resources for increased food production supported by $30 million from PPCR million from the PPCR in 10 rural districts, supported by $2.2 million from the PPCR Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 15 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary PPCR Supports Resilience across Sectors Water Resources Management 281.54 175.52 Urban Development 185.60 149.90 Infrastructure 73.08 40.28 ALLOCATED FUNDING Enabling Environment Including capacity 156.04 APPROVED FUNDING BY MDBS development, policy & regulatory work 116.85 Coastal Zone Management 174.01 158.01 Climate Information Systems & 21.50 Disaster Risk Management 15.75 Agriculture & Landscape 193.21 Management 143.21 - 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 300.00 US $ (in millions) Data as of December 31, 2014. Source: PPCR Semi-annual Operational Report, May, 2015 Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 16 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Climate Change Program National Planning 100 100 Urban Development 90 Environment 90 Setting Targets 80 70 80 70 Forestry 60 Agriculture 60 and Monitoring 50 Social Development 50 Rural Development (Agriculture, Livestock, Environment) 40 40 Progress on 30 20 30 20 Soil Conservation and Integration of Irrigation 10 0 Watershed Management 10 0 Climate Change into National & Water Induced Disasters Roads and Bridges Sector Planning Transport and Equipment Health Rural Development Hydrometeorology Water Supply and Sanitation Rural Infrastructure Baseline (2011) 2014 Target Water Resource Management Baseline (2010) 2014 Target National Planning National Planning 100 100 90 90 80 80 70 70 60 60 50 50 40 40 Agriculture 30 Transport Tourism 30 Water 20 20 10 10 0 0 Source: PPCR 2014 Results Report Community Water Coastal and Marine Health Baseline (2011) 2014 Target Baseline (2011) 2014 Target Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 17 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Government of Niger Climate Change Program 100 100 90 Roads and Bridges 90 Environment Setting Targets 80 80 70 70 60 Rural Development and Monitoring Urban Development 60 50 Agriculture Social Development 50 (Agriculture, Livestock, Environment) 40 Progress on 40 30 30 20 Strengthened Irrigation 20 10 Soil Conservation and Watershed Management 10 0 0 Government Capacity Water Induced Disasters Hydrometeorology Transport and Equipment Health Rural Development Forestry Water Supply & Sanitation Rural Infrastructure Water Resource Management Baseline ( 2011) 2014 Target Baseline (2010) 2014 Target Samoa Government Saint Lucia 100 Government 90 100 90 80 80 70 70 60 60 50 50 40 40 Agriculture 30 Transport Tourism 30 Water 20 20 10 10 0 0 Source: PPCR 2014 Results Report Coastal and Health Community Water Marine Baseline (2011) 2014 Target Baseline (2011) Baseline (2011) Target Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 18 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary “In Zambia, the leadership from the Ministry of Finance coupled with inclusive stakeholder Learn more engagement has shown how complementary bottom-up and top-down approaches through PPCR are making a real difference in resilience planning and action.” — David Kaluba, Principal Economist, Ministry of Finance and National Planning, and National Coordinator of the Interim Inter-Ministerial Climate Change Secretariat, Zambia Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 19 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary  Good basis for uptake of PPCR lessons in  Inform Bank sector investment projects & Multi-Sector Plans under IDA-17 Development Policy Operations (DPOs)  Inform preparation of SPCRs for new PPCR  Bolster resilience efforts of Bank and Pilot Countries Country portfolio  Showcase experiences in Reimbursable  Inform new horizons: Green Climate Fund Advisory Services on Climate Resilience and Sector TA Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 20 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Key climate related commitments long-term climate change and disaster risks and, where risks exist, integrate appropriate under IDA-17: resilience measures.  All Country Partnership Frameworks to  Scale up support to IDA countries to develop and incorporate climate and disaster risk implement country-led, Multi-sectoral Plans considerations into the analysis of the country’s (MSPs) and investments for managing climate development challenges and priorities and, and disaster risk in development in at least 25 when agreed with the country, incorporate such additional IDA countries. considerations in the content of the programs and the results framework.  Screen all new IDA operations for short- and Note: (i) IDA is the World Bank Fund for the Poorest Countries (ii) MSP countries were seen as "additional" to PPCR countries Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 21 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Feature Pilot Program for Climate Resilience Multi-Sector Plans Round 1 Selected number of countries? YES YES Strategic approach to climate resilience? YES YES Direct financial support for planning & YES More limited and for planning only investments? High-level Bank and partner country attention? YES Could be but not required Formal partnerships with other development YES Could be but not required partners? Formal investment plan design? YES NO Comprehensive international and national YES NO stakeholder input? Formal approval mechanism YES NO Despite the differences, commonality of purpose between PPCR and MSPs provides good basis for shared learning and uptake of lessons. Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 22 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary  New PPCR countries could leap-frog into  Direct exchange between current and new PPCR resilience pathways and reduce transaction time countries through dedicated learning fora (e.g., through “lessons learned” and from country PPCR Pilot countries meeting) and other case examples. modalities (South-South exchanges) could escalate learning and success.  Existing countries could also benefit from this shared learning—both within countries to help scale-up effort, and through cross learning between countries. Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 23 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Learn more Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 24 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary 1. What is the PPCR? 2. What is the SPCR? 3. What is so special about the PPCR and why is it so important to learn lessons from it? 4. How have these lessons been derived from the PPCR? 5. How have these lessons been structured? 6. Do I have to apply each lesson? 7. How applicable are these lessons to MSP development for IDA-17 and/or to any other resilience building investment programs? 8. How different are these lessons from good development practice? 9. Are these lessons relevant to the private sector? 10. Where can I access these PPCR lessons learned? Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 25 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary 1. What is the PPCR? The $1.2 billion Pilot Program for Climate Resilience (PPCR) is a funding window of the Climate Investment Funds that assists developing countries to integrate climate resilience into development planning and investment. The PPCR delivers support to 18 highly vulnerable countries and two regional programs through a two-phase process: a preparation phase to undertake diagnostics and develop a strategic investment framework to strengthen climate resilience, followed by an investment phase to address climate-related risks. As of May 2015, an additional 10 countries will receive PPCR support to develop strategic plans for climate resilience. 2. What is the SPCR? The strategic program for climate resilience (SPCR) is a country-owned and led framework identifying vulnerabilities and priorities for mainstreaming climate resilience into development planning and investment. The SPCR is developed through a participatory process that includes: identifying priorities and strategies, defining key agencies, allocating tasks among agencies, MDBs and other partners, and developing a results framework to track progress. The SPCR builds on policy and analytical work already underway in a country and is designed to attract other multi-lateral or bilateral development funding, including climate finance from the Green Climate Fund (GCF). Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 26 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary 3. What is so special about the PPCR and why is it so important to learn lessons from it? The PPCR is currently the largest dedicated source of finance for adaptation initiatives in developing countries. Moreover, the PPCR is the only funding mechanism that both encourages and provides the significant resources needed to help countries develop and implement a programmatic approach through both planning and investment in its first phase. Because project-based activities alone have limited potential to effect national or sector-wide transformations, a programmatic approach entails a long-term and strategic arrangement of linked investment projects and activities aimed at achieving large-scale impacts, taking advantage of synergies and co-financing opportunities. Lessons from the first round of PPCR countries can inform larger processes, including multi-sectoral resilience plans, country partnership frameworks, and even national development plans. As 10 new countries were extended funding to prepare SPCRs in May 2015, it is important that these countries benefit from the experiences and learning of the 18 countries that have preceded them. 4. How have these lessons been derived from the PPCR? These lessons are derived from both the preparation of the SPCR and the implementation of PPCR investments. The top 10 lessons were distilled through an iterative process of consultation and validation with Bank task teams and country teams. They build on evaluations undertaken by the Climate Investment Funds and project and program documentation. Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 27 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary 5. How have these lessons been structured? The lessons are structured in a cascading approach—starting with key messages targeted for higher level management that help frame the discussion with counterparts and provide strategic direction, then drilling down into progressively more detail relevant to task teams through sub-lessons, country case studies, and guidance on “how to do” and “what to avoid” for enhanced success. 6. Do I have to apply each lesson? The lessons reflect common themes across all PPCR countries and there is complementarity among lessons. However, not all lessons may be equally relevant in every context. As each lesson is substantiated through a country case study, you can always start learning from the experience of countries that share similar climate risks, resources, and institutional capacities as your clients. 7. How applicable are these lessons to MSP development for IDA-17 and/or to any other resilience building investment programs? This KP seeks to capture and share strategic, technical and operational lessons derived from the PPCR experience, emphasizing the “how” and “why” to inform practical action. As the PPCR embraces a multi-sectoral, programmatic approach, these lessons are highly relevant to the development of multi-sectoral plans (MSP) under IDA-17. More broadly, any program that aspires to address climate risks through a strategic approach linking planning and investment can learn from cross-cutting lessons on coordination across multiple sectors, risk assessments to determine investment priorities, and how to develop a national monitoring and reporting framework that tracks progress and informs decision making. Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 28 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary 8. How different are these lessons from good development practice? Many PPCR pilot countries have adopted innovative approaches to good development practice such as stakeholder consultation and inter-agency coordination. The country case studies on innovative use of ICT in Zambia, consultations with the vulnerable groups in Yemen, and stakeholder coordination in Tajikistan demonstrate benefits beyond the PPCR process. 9. Are these lessons relevant to the private sector? The key lessons include both public and private sector experiences. Lesson seven on Private Sector Engagement specifically focuses on the barriers, opportunities, and approaches to effectively engage private sector. 10. Where can I access these PPCR lessons learnt? The set of 10 top lessons will be available on the CIF website. Introduction Quick Links: 1 ) Purpose & Approach 2) PPCR Basics 3) Relevance 4) FAQ’s 29 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Lessons Quick Links: i) List of Top 10 Lessons ii) Summary of Top 10 Lessons  Begin Lessons 30 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary 1. High Level Coordination across Multiple Sectors 6. Learning and Exchange Lessons from design and early implementation stages of the PPCR which 2. Assessing Vulnerability to Climate Risks and Hazards 7. Private Sector Engagement have enhanced uptake of climate resilience in pilot countries. 3. Linking and Leveraging Investments 8. PPCR Early Lessons on Monitoring & Reporting 4. Transformational Investments and Policy Reforms 9. Responsive Country-based Approach 5. Stakeholder Engagement 10. Nurturing Ownership in Regional Programs Lessons Quick Links: i) List of Top 10 Lessons ii) Summary of Top 10 Lessons  Begin Lessons 31 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary coordination across multiple sectors supported at the highest levels of government was the most effective approach for shaping a program of resilient investments, and is promising for implementation effectiveness and anticipated scaling up. (Learn more) all countries were able to shape investment plans and priorities based on their experience and evidence with current climate variability and impacts. The PPCR continues to be instrumental in bolstering the evidence base of knowledge for future impacts; a critical factor for accelerating resilient development. (Learn more) the expectation of linked and leveraged funds at scale through formal MDB collaboration and Phase 2 grants and concessional loans was pivotal for country buy-in. Planning grants alone would have been insufficient. Both linked investments and leveraged investments were instrumental in advancing and catalyzing countries’ resilience pathways. (Learn more) Lessons Quick Links: i) List of Top 10 Lessons ii) Summary of Top 10 Lessons  Begin Lessons 32 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary many SPCRs are fostering transformational investments and policy reforms going beyond Phase 2 investment funds. This advanced partnering with bilateral and country-based funding sources, spurred policy reforms, and furthered the incorporation of resilience at the national, regional and local levels. (Learn more) mandatory and documented stakeholder engagement built ownership and support for the planning and investment selection process. The PPCR built new pathways in some countries and enhanced existing structures in others; already enhancing positive relationships during implementation of specific investments. (Learn more) the periodic dedicated learning and exchange fora among pilot countries have proven especially valuable. These help build credibility and professionalism of participants while sharing practical experiences and engendering shared South-South experiences. (Learn More) Lessons Quick Links: i) List of Top 10 Lessons ii) Summary of Top 10 Lessons  Begin Lessons 33 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary upfront technical assistance and targeted advisory services has been critical for overcoming barriers to engaging the private sector on climate resilience. This includes piloting new modalities of climate adaptation, validating their commercial viability, and creating an enabling environment for successful investments. (Learn more) The simplified set of 5 core resilience indicators for PPCR monitoring and reporting is seen as a practical and viable framework and several countries are beginning to see the benefits of tracking overall national progress towards resilient development. (Learn more) the program’s ability to evolve and be responsive to country capacities, political structures, and overall development regimes was pivotal for acceptance. The PPCR played a catalytic role in countries whose adaptation planning was nascent. (Learn more) Regional approaches have the potential for bolstering country-based programming with implementation synergies. National-level strategy linked with concrete investments ensured sustained engagement with countries. (Learn more) Lessons Quick Links: i) List of Top 10 Lessons ii) Summary of Top 10 Lessons  Begin Lessons 34 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Learn more Coordination across multiple sectors supported at the highest levels of government was the most effective approach for shaping a program of resilient investments, and is promising for implementation effectiveness and anticipated scaling up. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L1: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 35 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Overview of PPCR Modalities for Coordination Across Multiple Sectors Basic approach to interagency coordination PPCR Countries using this approach Climate Change Committee or Council Bangladesh, Grenada, Nepal, Saint Lucia, Samoa, Tajikistan,* Tonga, Yemen,* Zambia* Environment, Sustainable Development, Planning Committee or Council Dominica, Haiti, Mozambique, Niger PPCR Steering or Coordination Committee Caribbean Region,* Grenada,* Jamaica,* Nepal,* Niger,* Saint Lucia,* Saint Vincent & the Grenadines,* Samoa,* Tajikistan Technical Team or Working Group Cambodia, Dominica,* Grenada,* Jamaica, Nepal,* Papua New Guinea, Tajikistan,* Tonga, Zambia* *Countries denoted with * did not have an interagency mechanism before PPCR Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L1: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 36 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Overview of PPCR Modalities for Coordination Across Multiple Sectors Example from the Tajikistan PPCR With Representatives of Committees and Sector Ministries. (with permanent Manager, national to provide expertise on for stakeholder liaison and international counterparts) demand Civil Sector Society Strategies & dialogue Devt. Plans with National & with National & with National & international experts international experts international experts Links to Links to NGO bilateral programs programs Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L1: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 37 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Sub-Lessons Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L1: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 38 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary PPCR Sub-Lessons on High Level Coordination Across Multiple Sectors  Best when leadership for developing multi-sector strongly supported by senior government officials approaches rests with the Ministry of Finance or (e.g., ; ; St. Lucia). comparable institution given influence at highest levels of Government,  is key at , and experience dealing with National level for programmatic delivery, MDB finance (e.g. , Samoa, Cambodia, follow the ). normal route through .  Leadership by with responsibility over natural resources or water infrastructure can be effective (e.g., ); but without such responsibilities.  , climate adaptation project implementation units, and similar structures planning process if Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L1: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 39 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Case Studies Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L1: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 40 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Zambia: on High-Level Coordination across Multiple Sectors through Ministry of Finance Organizational structure vis-à-vis senior  CC Secretariat led by Ministry of Finance (MoF) as the cross-sectoral platform is being formalized. officials and sector ministries?  MoF had proven experience in working and influencing investments across-sectors.  Early recognition of transformative nature of PPCR and influence on development planning. Why did it work for planning?  Preparation of investment plan overlapped timing with the national development planning cycle.  Cross-sector coordination mechanism led by MoF quickly recognized positive influence of investment $ in Phase 2. Will it work for implementation?  Promising since PPCR structure is being utilized to access funds from GCF. What was Bank/MDB role?  Advisory and facilitation on establishing and strengthening the new institutional arrangements and coordinating mechanism.  Technical assistance and capacity building to strengthen decentralized (national, provincial and district levels) implementation and coordination across sectors. Other points?  Strong political buy-in leveraged three-fold additional national budget allocation in FY15 compared to FY14 for PPCR specific investments. Other countries with comparable  Samoa and Cambodia; where PPCR supported mainstreaming in national/sub-national development structures? plans. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L1: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 41 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Bolivia: on Cross-Sector and Regional Coordination through Ministry of Environment & Water Organizational structure vis-à-vis senior officials  Ministry of Environment and Water (MoEW) responsible for major irrigation and water supply and sector ministries? infrastructure.  Vice Minister of MoEW was strong champion and tenaciously advanced and protected PPCR  Partnerships at regional and municipal levels. Why did it work for planning?  MoEW has responsibility for the key sectors impacted by climate change (water) at national and sub-national level.  Solid links with regional and local planning and investment.  Helpful to have smaller number of operations in limited sectors. Will it work for implementation?  The institutional set-up with the cross-sector competencies of the MoEW and an active integration of regional and municipal authorities ensures the participation of all main stakeholders.  National stakeholders (MoEW and Ministry of Planning), and regional and local government are engaged in improving policies and planning instruments to mainstream climate resilience throughout the Project (ownership).  Political dissonance between central and decentralized governments could hamper implementation. What was Bank/MDB role?  Strengthened the role of the MoEW who then had the weight to catalyze coordination across government and with international partners. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L1: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 42 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Niger: on Multi-sector Coordination through National Council for Sustainable Development Organizational structure vis-à-vis senior officials  The National Council for Environment and Sustainable Development (CNED), an institution and sector ministries? attached to the Prime Minister, serves as champion.  Speech of the President of Niger on the importance of the program for the country resilience spurred engagement.  Ministry of Planning taking on increasing leadership roles. Why did it work for planning?  Provided vehicle for earlier planning; Niger essentially “pre-funded” Phase 1 to submit their investment needs quickly and efficiently to target critical food security concerns.  Built on the existing cross-sector coordination mechanism with support of Technical Secretariat of the National Commission on Climate Change and Variability. Will it work for implementation?  Promising; appears to be influencing technical and financial partners to take broad programmatic approach.  CNED has mainstreamed resilience into development plans for more than 30 districts through consultative processes. What was Bank/MDB role?  Technical support on the PPCR implementation: Concept Note preparation, monitoring & reporting, capacity building, etc.  Coordination and linkages with other Bank operations related to CC and DRM. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L1: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 43 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Mozambique: Multi-sector Coordination Transits from Planning to Environment Ministry Organizational structure vis-à-vis senior officials  The Ministry of Planning and Development (MPD) provided strong leadership and took initial and sector ministries? responsibility for implementation before transferring this to the climate change focal point—the Ministry for the Coordination and Environmental Affairs (MICOA). Why did it work for planning?  MPD (now incorporated with the Ministry of Economy and Finance) is responsible for planning across government. MPD’s engagement was key for securing agreement between ministries and agencies over priorities and resource allocation. Will it work for implementation?  Implementation would have been more efficient had MPD retained overall management responsibility and with sectors, including environment, responsible for specific implementation tasks.  Weak convening capacity at MICOA has constrained implementation. What was Bank/MDB role?  World Bank provided day-to-day support and guidance to Government throughout the process and continues in this role. Other points?  The final design of SPCR included a minimum of 7 investment projects (mostly blended to leverage larger investments from IDA and the African Development Fund).  This proved reasonably successful in terms of leverage and sector mainstreaming, but introduced great complexity.  Further, the allocation to support technical assistance has been constrained given capacity limitations. Investment projects have also taken a great deal longer to get underway than was anticipated at design. Hence, take into account the time needed to build preparation and implementation capacity on the ground. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L1: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 44 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Yemen: Pioneers High-Level Coordination through Inter-Ministerial Committee for Climate Change Organizational structure vis-à-vis senior officials  Creation of Inter-Ministerial Committee on Climate Change (IMCCC) by Ministry of Planning and sector ministries? and International Cooperation in leadership role.  Building on the capacity of Environment Protection Authority on climate issue through its designation as the Technical Secretariat of IMCCC. Why did it work for planning?  Creation of cross-sectoral IMCCC early in the PPCR process facilitated engagement of key sectors on the preparation of the investment plan.  Participatory process and numerous consultations were conducted in preparation of SPCR. Will it work for implementation?  The IMCCC continues to demonstrate strong ownership through an active role as Implementation Committee (IC) of the program.  Strong commitment to the first cross-sectoral program under the leadership of IMCCC. What was Bank/MDB role?  Technical support on the PPCR implementation. Other points?  Achievement made in signing MOU among the Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation, the Ministry of Transport and the Ministry of Water and Environment to ensure cooperation and facilitate exchange of key hydrometeorological and climate datasets. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L1: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 45 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary What to Do/Avoid Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L1: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 46 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Effective High Level Coordination across Multiple Sectors  Find and at the (e.g., water, agriculture, energy, transport, and highest level of government; one who can see development). across sectors and directly influence development planning and has convening  by existing climate power. and sustainable development coordinating groups, capacity-building efforts, etc.  Maintain and into implementation  Seek of resilience plans and national and sub-national  Try to by investment plans. Ministries who lack direct engagement with investments which need strengthened resilience Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L1: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 47 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Learn more All countries were able to shape investment plans and priorities based on their experiences and evidence with current climate variability and impacts. The PPCR continues to be instrumental in bolstering the evidence base of knowledge for future impacts; a critical factor for accelerating resilient development. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L2: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 48 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Sub-Lessons Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L2: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 49 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary PPCR Lessons on Assessing Vulnerability to Climate Risks and Hazards  Each PPCR country had a donors to recent disasters, were key complementary to inform the preparation of their factors (e.g., Samoa; Tonga). investment plan to bolster climate resilience— from experience with climate related disasters, analytical  Countries where climate risks are already being felt work to projections of climate impacts on critical at critical sectors were able to quickly sectors. to those sectors (e.g., Niger for food security, Bangladesh on coastal embankments).  Countries with an of sector risk were best suited to identify truly  All PPCR countries requested financing for transformational investments (e.g., ; strengthening of as a Zambia; Samoa). foundational element in refining their understanding and management of risks.  Equally important: and other disaster risks in the general population, reflecting impact on key economic sectors. High-level . awareness by government, and the response of Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L2: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 50 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Case Studies Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L2: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 51 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Mozambique: Experience on Assessing Vulnerability to Climate Risks and Hazards Base of knowledge on climate risks and impacts  Recurrent climate-related impacts from floods on transport, agriculture and other sectors— average $400 million annual losses. Previous Bank support on complementary topics  WB Economics of Climate Change report; additional analytical work and DPO preparation. Targeted use of PPCR funds  The roads sector comprises the largest recipient of public investment expenditure and regularly experiences high damage costs associated with severe flood cycles. PPCR provided the first support for addressing climate risks in infrastructure and is supporting surveys and inventories of climate risks to roads networks in vulnerable areas, will support piloting of climate resilient roads designs and is supporting the development of climate resilient national roads standards to achieve transformative impact at national level. Government has also introduced a reform that now requires mandatory screening of all new roads investments. Transformational impact  PPCR support for technical assistance and investments in Mozambique are complemented by a programmatic Development Policy Lending series which supports national level reforms that build resilience into development planning and investment in seven sectors. This has helped achieve significant transformative impacts. Other points  At the start of the PPCR process, there was limited understanding of the options available for building climate resilience into mainstream development planning and investment. Over time, dialogue on climate resilient planning combined with a strong focus on ensuring that climate financing was used to achieve tangible development outcomes, as changed attitudes and approaches. The roads sector in particular has shown real progress in responding to the climate change agenda in a progressive and practical way. A dedicated PPCR project on Transforming Hydrometeorological Services is under implementation, which aims to strengthen climate information services delivery. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L2: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 52 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Hydrometeorological Investments Identified as a Critical Pillar for Enhanced Resilience by all PPCR countries Nepal, Niger, Samoa, Tajikistan, Zambia, Cambodia, Bangladesh, Bolivia, PNG, Jamaica, Tonga, Yemen, Early warning Caribbean/Pacific Regional Programs systems Nepal, Tajikistan, Mozambique, St. Research Nepal, Niger, Tajikistan, Zambia, St. Lucia, Lucia, Caribbean Regional Program Improved Bolivia, Jamaica, Haiti, Tonga, Yemen (precipitation equipment patterns, glaciers) Grenada, Nepal, Niger, SVG, Nepal, Mozambique, Cambodia, St. Tajikistan, Zambia, Cambodia, Lucia, Bolivia, Jamaica, Tonga, Bangladesh, St. Lucia, Bolivia, Capacity building Better observations Yemen Haiti, Tonga, Yemen Niger, Tajikistan, St. Lucia, Caribbean Improved Climate Improved Nepal, SVG, St. Lucia, Bolivia, Jamaica, Yemen Regional Program Change modeling forecasting Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L2: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 53 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary What to Do/Avoid Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L2: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 54 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Assessing Vulnerability to Climate Risks and Hazards  by a purported lack of data  Recognize that nearly or models to assess risk. from investments and capacity building for improved weather and climate services, though  Recognize that the on staffing and maintenance of such infrastructure climate risks and vulnerabilities has advanced and generation of dedicated climate services greatly in recent years and is contained in National remains a challenge. Communications to the UNFCCC, and through many third-party organizations.  Empower/encourage decision makers to and the users  Learn from the of of weather and climate data, information and practitioners. services to ensure effectiveness of long-term investments in system improvement. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L2: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 55 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Learn more The expectation of linked and leveraged funds at scale through formal MDB collaboration and Phase 2 grants and concessional loans was pivotal for country buy-in. Planning grants alone would have been insufficient. Both linked investments and leveraged investments were instrumental in advancing and catalyzing countries’ resilience pathways. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L3: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 56 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Sub-Lessons Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L3: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 57 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary PPCR Lessons on Linking and Leveraging Investments  for  Maintaining during the dedicated investments in Phase 2 ensured and investment phase is in some countries. . Phase 1 planning grants alone may not have sufficed.  and engagement with other a  Both investments—through blended more to pipeline investments financing with PPCR dedicated funds; and (e.g. Yemen, Niger). —through collective financing and action have been .  through SPCR process , reduced country burden of donor coordination, and enhanced high-level visibility (e.g.: , ; Yemen). Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L3: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 58 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Leveraged Finance IDA Co- Other Co- Borrower Total Co- Total Project PPCR Amount Country PPCR Projects with Co-finance finance finance Co-finance finance Finance (US$ M) (US$ M) (US$ M) (US$ M) (US$ M) (US$ M) Bangladesh Coastal Embankment Improvement Project 25.00 375.00 375.00 400.00 Bolivia Climate Resilience - Integrated Basin Management 46.00 25.90 26.00 72.00 Dominica Disaster Vulnerability Reduction Project 21.00 17.00 1.50 19.00 40.00 Grenada Regional Disaster Vulnerability Reduction Project 16.00 10.00 1.00 3.00 14.00 30.00 Haiti Center and Artibonite Regional Development 8.00 50.00 50.00 58.00 Climate Resilience: Transforming Hydrometeorological Mozambique 15.00 6.00 6.00 21.00 Services Roads and Bridges Management and Maintenance Project Mozambique 15.75 39.40 15.00 40.00 94.00 110.00 APL2 - Additional Financing Mozambique Climate Change and Technical Assistance Project 2.00 0.52 1.00 3.00 Pacific Regional Program Pacific Resilience Program 6.114 32.293 6.979 39.00 45.00 Saint Lucia Saint Lucia Disaster Vulnerability Reduction Project 27.00 41.00 41.00 68.00 Saint Vincent and the Regional Disaster Vulnerability Reduction Project 10.00 10.92 1.00 1.00 13.00 23.00 Grenadines Saint Vincent and the Additional financing to the Regional Disaster Vulnerability 5.00 35.60 36.00 41.00 Grenadines Reduction Program (RDVRP) Enhancing the Climate Resilience of the West Coast Road Samoa 15.00 2.22 2.00 17.00 (Apia to Airport) Improvement of Weather, Climate and Hydrological Service Tajikistan 7.00 6.00 6.00 13.00 Delivery Tajikistan Environmental Land Management and Rural Livelihoods 9.00 7.43 7.00 17.00 Additional financing to Environmental Land Management and Tajikistan 2.00 1.80 0.26 2.00 4.00 Rural Livelihoods 231.00 619.00 38.00 74.00 731.00 1,108.00 • Snapshot: For the 16 blended projects, each dollar of PPCR investment leveraged • IDA and governments are the most important sources of co-finance, which account for US$3.2 in co-financing from IDA, government and other sources. 85% (US$619M) and 10% (US$74M) of all PPCR co-financing, respectively. • Other sources include: GFDRR, GEF, NDF, DfID, SCCF, JICA. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L3: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 59 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Linked Finance Total PPCR Country Project Title* Linked Projects Linked Finance Amount (US$ M) Mozambique Cities and Climate Change PPCR AF 15.75 • Cities and Climate Change (P123201) IDA: US$120 million • National Water Resources Development IDA:US$70 million Project (P107350) Climate Resilience: Transforming Mozambique 15 • Mozambique Climate Change Development IDA: US$150 million Hydrometeorological Services Policy Operation (DPO series) that contains two hydro-met Policy actions • Roads and Bridges Management and IDA: US$100 million Maintenance Project APL2 (P083325) Roads and Bridges Management and Mozambique 15.75 Maintenance Project APL2 - Additional Financing • Nacala road corridor project - Mozambique AfDB : UA 38.65 million; JICA: UA 49.34 million; NDF: EUR 3.8 million Climate Change and Technical Assistance • Mozambique Climate Change Development US$150 million Mozambique 2 Project Policy Operation (DPO series) Community Action Project for Climate Resilience • Community Action Program Phase 2 (PAC2) IDA: US$30 million; Borrower: US$6.6 million; Local Niger 64 (CAPCR) (P102354) Communities: US$3.7 million Climate Information System and PPCR Program 19 IDA: US$90 million; Germany-KfW: US$60.7 Coordination Yemen • Yemen-Water Sector Support (P107037) million; Netherlands: US$48.75 million; Borrower: 19 US$141.1 million Climate Resilience of Rural Communities Enhancing the Climate Resilience of Coastal • Enhancing Resilience of Samoa's Coastal UNDP and the Adaptation Fund: US$8 million Samoa 15 Resources and Communities Communities to Climate Change Strengthening Hydro-meteorological Services • Climate Services to Reduce Vulnerability in Haiti 5 Environment Canada/WMO: US$5 million Project Haiti *The PPCR projects are linked with and informed by the ongoing and upcoming IDA initiatives and vice versa. PPCR projects are also informed and complemented by other donor funded activities and government initiatives. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L3: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 60 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Case Studies Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L3: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 61 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Mozambique: Leveraging Resources and Linking Complementary Activities to Scale Up Good Practices across Sectors Linked or leveraged or • Linked and leveraged financing across sectors and thematic areas: roads, urban, hydrometeorological services. both? Leverage factors? • PPCR Roads project with highest leverage factor of 1 : 6, including IDA, borrower and DfID/GFDRR resources. How leverage/ linking • US$15.75 million PPCR finance leveraged US$94 million, including US$39.4 million in IDA and US$40 million in influenced the larger government funds, for roads investment. sector mainstreaming? • PPCR investment of US$15 million on hydrometeorological services has leveraged US$6 million from the Nordic Development Fund to improve weather and climate services delivery. • US$15 million PPCR project on Cities and Climate Change PPCR AF is linked to a larger Cities and Climate Change project (US$120 million in IDA) • All PPCR projects are linked to Mozambique Climate Change Development Policy Operation (DPO series; US$150 million in IDA) and are influencing and also benefiting from the DPO activities. Did it influence reform? • The PPCR supported development of national/sectoral design standards for resilient roads as well as mandatory risk screening requirements for all road projects, which will contribute to long term sustainability of the investments. Other Haiti: • US$50 million IDA resource was leveraged through US$8 million PPCR grants to support the development of the Centre Artibonite Loop region by enhancing all-weather connectivity and the region's resilience to climate change. • Strengthening Hydro-Met Services project (US$5 million) coordinated strongly with other donor (IDB, WMO, EU, USAID, UNDP) financed activities to converge on a common approach for supporting the modernization of hydromet services. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L3: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 62 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Niger: Linking Complementary Activities and Initiatives with a Focus on Food Security and Sustainable Land Management Linked or leveraged • Community Action Project for Climate Resilience (CAPCR) is a standalone PPCR project that builds on the lessons learned or both? from an earlier IDA-funded project on Community Action Program (US$30 million in IDA; US$6.6 million from government financing; US$3.7 million from local communities). • Niger’s 3N Initiative, “Nigeriens Nourishing Nigeriens” (Nigerians feed Nigerians) leverages and builds on CAPCR as continued response to food security due to increasing climate variability and change. How leverage/ • Mechanisms to explore how CAPCR, 3N and other initiatives contribute to the overall national strategy for food security are linking influenced underway. the larger sector • The High Commissioner of the 3N Initiative participates in CAPCR M&R activities and supervision missions. mainstreaming? Did it influence • Scaled up attention and reform to address food insecurity and sustainable land management in the face of climate change. reform? Other The OECS countries in the Caribbean: • thematic focus on measurable reduction of disaster and climate vulnerability in the Eastern Caribbean, using US$90 million PPCR resource envelope in the form of grants and loans. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L3: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 63 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary The Caribbean: Horizontal Adaptable Program Loan (APL) Instrument to Scale Up Disaster Vulnerability Reduction Efforts in 4 OECS Countries Linked or leveraged • The Disaster and Vulnerability Reduction Projects for OECS countries (Grenada, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Saint or both? Lucia, Dominica) leveraged US$122 million as co-finance, mostly through IDA financing, with US$88 million PPCR resources. • These 4 DVRP projects are linked through a horizontal Adaptable Program Loan (APL) and are being implemented as a series. Leverage factors? • Dominica: 0.88 • Grenada: 0.56 • Saint Lucia: 1.5 • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: 3.3 How leverage/ • IDA leverage allowed for scaled up actions to addressing current vulnerabilities, while integrating longer term climate resilience linking influenced considerations into the project interventions. the larger sector mainstreaming? Did it influence • PPCR funded DVRPs are providing an opportunity to transform the business-as-usual approach to address disaster risks in reform? the short term to systematically taking into consideration long-term climate impacts and resilience measures. Other Haiti: • US$50 million IDA resource was leveraged through US$8 million PPCR grants to support the development of the Centre Artibonite Loop region, primarily by enhancing all-weather connectivity and logistics for producers, and the region's resilience to climate change. OECS is the Organization of Eastern Caribbean States Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L3: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 64 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Tajikistan: Building on Relative MDB Strengths Development Partner Established Focal Area/Pipeline Investment Benefits from SPCR and Phase 2 Funds World Bank (IDA) • Rural agriculture and poverty reduction • Demonstrate and disseminate more resilient agricultural • Regional knowledge on weather and climate methods and technical norms • Major upgrading of HydroMet equipment, services and delivery mechanisms through a region wide program • Target interventions to rural population at-risk ADB • River basin management • Major improvement in weather forecasts and climate modeling • Demonstrate improved flood resilience (Pyanj Basin pilot) EBRD • Hydropower improvement (semi-private sector) • Assessment of sector-wide climate risks • Implement practical resilience measures at major dam subject of EBRD co-financed upgrades UK DFiD • Accelerate attention to climate resilience by • Provided financing for PPCR Secretariat and international Government and donors experts at crucial stages Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L3: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 65 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Zambia: Leveraging Funds and Reducing MDB Transaction Costs in River Basin Management Established Focal Area Benefits from SPCR and Phase 2 Funds • Climate resilience, agriculture, and • World Bank and African Development Bank shared project preparation documentation to reduce poverty reduction transaction costs in fast-paced PPCR. • Weather and climate information • Institutional coordination structures set up at national and district level across multi sector for implementing dissemination all climate resilient related projects (3-4 projects involved). • Integration of climate risk into • Strong government political evidence in increased government budgetary allocation to $2M in FY15 development planning (from $0.5M in FY14) • Planning in place to seek eventual GCF funding; scaling up of PPCR investment using the same implementation model. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L3: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 66 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary What to Do/Avoid Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L3: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 67 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Linking and Leveraging Investments  multi-sector resilience  Consider a ; investment plans in with it’s extra work but can be extremely effective in MDBs and development partners. leveraging institutional strengths and funding.  opportunities  Seek to in MDB for linking and leveraging of financing, looking processing and decision-making to reduce for opportunities of comparative advantage, transaction costs and help meet overall program efficiencies, and scale-up for resilience objectives in a timely fashion. programming. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L3: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 68 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Learn more Many SPCRs are fostering transformational investments and policy reforms going beyond Phase 2 investment funds. This advanced partnering with bilateral and country-based funding sources, spurred policy reforms, and furthered the incorporation of resilience at the national, regional and local levels. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L4: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 69 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Sub-Lessons Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L4: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 70 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary PPCR Lessons on Transforming Sectors  Many SPCRs are  Some SPCRs were successful at mobilizing through incorporation of resilience in national and significant sub-national development planning (e.g., within a country (e.g., ). Bangladesh; ; Cambodia; Bolivia).  Bank Development Policy Operations can support reforms both broadly and in key identified in the SPCR (e.g., ). Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L4: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 71 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Case Studies Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L4: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 72 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Bolivia: Transformation in the Rio Grande Basin Critical PPCR investments • Focus on improving integrated river basin management. • Strengthen institutional capacity. • Investments in infrastructure subprojects (main irrigation canals and flood protection). • Investments in watershed management subprojects. Key factor spurring sector • National level policies that integrate climate change resilience translated into local level actions. transformation • Linked in to regular pipeline and planning of water supply, irrigation and flood protection investments; co-financing at 50% and 30% local funds. Spin-off effects • PPCR has engaged the support of the Swiss, German and Japanese, among other donors. • Better understanding of the impacts of CC on the water sector will also foster resilient planning and design in other sectors like transport and energy. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L4: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 73 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Mozambique: A More Resilient Roads Sector Critical PPCR investments • Piloting planning approaches, designs and maintenance approaches that will strengthen the resilience of rural roads infrastructure and efficient integration for improved accessibility in the Zambezi valley. • The PPCR spurred the development of climate resilient national roads standards to achieve transformative impact at national level. Key factor spurring sector • Recurrent climate-related impacts from floods on transport, agriculture and other sectors– average $400M annual transformation losses. • An estimated $US2–11 million per year increase in maintenance costs of unpaved and paved roads from precipitation and temperature changes. Spin-off effects • Government has also introduced a reform that now requires mandatory screening of all new roads investments. • New climate resilient road standards. This was included as a policy reform in the Climate Development Policy Grant— and is triggering other sectoral reforms. Other factors • Ministry of Public Works and Housing is called for screening of all road operations. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L4: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 74 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Zambia: Mainstreaming Climate Resilience into Planning Critical PPCR investments • Investments in the Western and southern Provinces (Barotse and Kafue) to improve livelihoods of the poorest communities, and inform integrated development plans at district and provincial levels. Key factor spurring sector • Bottom up proven climate resilient interventions designed through inclusive and rigorous stakeholder engagement with transformation communities, NGOs, district and provincial planners. Spin-off effects • Local NGOs as ‘Climate Resilient Adaptation Facilitator Teams’ have been instrumental in raising awareness not just of communities but also district and provincial teams on the climate risks, and identification of climate resilience measures. • The enhanced capacity of districts, and the institutional arrangements with links to the Inter-Ministerial Climate Change Secretariat under Ministry of Finance has realized opportunities to inform and transform at scale. Other factors • See earlier slide (under Cross-sector coordination) for more information. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L4: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 75 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary What to Do/Avoid Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L4: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 76 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Transforming Sectors  Lay the groundwork through  Move from projects to supporting  for building sector resilience beyond pilot projects and response only to near-term disasters Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L4: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 77 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Learn more Mandatory and documented stakeholder engagement built ownership and support for the planning and investment selection process. The PPCR built new pathways in some countries and enhanced existing structures in others; already enhancing positive relationships during implementation of specific investments. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L5: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 78 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Sub-Lessons Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L5: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 79 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary PPCR Lessons on Stakeholder Engagement  Tailored and innovative approaches to engaging  of stakeholders can generate with stakeholders (e.g., through crowd- opportunities for their continued engagement and sourcing input; and by reaching out to evolving role both within and beyond the program women) have enhanced (e.g., Zambia where CSOs engage in decision within the program. making forums and Monitoring and Reporting).  Positive benefits of stakeholder engagement extend to for Phase 2 and linked investments (e.g., Zambia, ).  and stakeholder engagement can yield positive results, especially where this may not be routinely applied (e.g., ). Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L5: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 80 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Case Studies Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L5: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 81 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Zambia: Stakeholder Engagement through Crowd Sourcing Innovation Key aspects of stakeholder • An innovative approach to stakeholder participation at the national, provincial, district and ward levels through “crowd engagement sourcing” innovations in ICT during the program planning process. Showed clear links to early warning and disaster risk reduction needs. • Engaged private sectors and CSO representatives in the high level technical committee investment priorities in the risk prone areas. • Traditional leadership authorities (Barotse Royal Establishment) became engaged in the district level assessment committees and provided coordination support with local vulnerable communities. How did it help? • Greatly enhanced national ownership by linking to partners involved in mitigation, adaptation and disaster risk reduction. • Helped achieve consensus during the planning process, prioritized investments, and validated project design, with advances to Phase 2. • Under a multi-sectoral national framework, catalyzed coordinated actions amongst the stakeholders at the field level. How will it sustain? • Promising; appears to be providing a comprehensive goal and vision for all the stakeholders to harmonize their interventions. • It has sustained past the SPCR phase 1 and also perceived to be useful in shaping national thinking towards any potential GCF process. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L5: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 82 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Yemen: Stakeholder Engagement Reaches Women Key aspects of stakeholder • A series of nationwide consultations throughout Phase 1 with an inclusive focus on women’s role in climate-vulnerable engagement sectors. How did it help? • Women play major role in the agriculture sector and are often under-represented. • Fostered understanding of shared interests among stakeholders, fostering ownership and momentum which is promising for larger scale activities in Phase 2. • Active engagement of the stakeholders also informed resilience priorities by highlighting the risks and vulnerabilities faced at the grass-roots level. How will it sustain? • The benefits of consultation enhanced engagement and communication among stakeholders and is expected to be continued at all levels of the resilience building program implementation. • Active involvement of women NGOs planned during program implementation. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L5: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 83 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Bolivia: Stakeholder Engagement Focuses on Water Key aspects of stakeholder • PPCR process played a critical role in focusing attention by stakeholders on the highly vulnerable water sector. engagement • This resulted in renewed partnerships ranging from local stakeholders to international donors. How did it help? • Engaged provincial and municipal institutions who have a major role in the planning, design and finance of infrastructure requiring greater resilience. • Mobilized stakeholders that have invested in agriculture and irrigation, and strengthened the national political will to safeguard the country’s threatened water resources. • Highlighted donor contributions to address the impacts of climate change on water availability. • Mobilized investments from international sources (Japanese, German and Swiss) in the water sector. How will it sustain? • Linking the investment plans to sub-national investment priorities bodes well for the implementation phase and continued partnerships. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L5: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 84 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Tajikistan: Stakeholder Engagement Takes Hold Key aspects of stakeholder • PPCR process took place in a country that rarely experienced true participatory stakeholder engagement, and has engagement slowly but steadily increased the breadth and depth of participation. How did it help? • Served as first National forum for sharing and collaborating on the wide range in resilience-related studies and projects. • Helped create a new and more influential audience for grass roots organizations to share their perspective though limitation of funds means many worthwhile local projects are short of funds. • Built credibility of PPCR Secretariat How will it sustain? • Still needs nurturing, but momentum continues to grow, through the PPCR and through regional dialogue on climate adaptation and resilience. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L5: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 85 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary The Caribbean: Multistep Approach to Stakeholder Engagement Key aspects of stakeholder • Multistep approach proved to be effective in the Eastern Caribbean countries. engagement • The engagement started with an initial broad stakeholder meeting, followed by multiple one-on-one in depth consultations on the SPCR program. • The summary was presented and validated in a concluding consultation meeting where all the stakeholders were present. • The approach allowed for stakeholder input into the progress update on the SPCR and at the same time, into the PPCR M&R, thereby integrating the PPCR monitoring into the dialogue at the national level. How did it help? • Ensured a common familiarity of issues across a wide group of stakeholders who had varying levels of knowledge and understanding about the PPCR program. • Allowed for depth in discussions through one-on-one engagement on key issues. • Raised the profile and increased interest in actions to mainstream resilience into development planning process How will it sustain? • Different Eastern Caribbean countries started with different capacity but the countries that had at least one champion with authority to bring issues to an appropriate forum progressed the most. • Eastern Caribbean countries are attempting to develop sustainable institutional mechanisms with support of the involved MDBs. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L5: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 86 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Samoa: Targeted Capacity Building for and Partnership with CSOs to Ensure Sustained Engagement Key aspects of stakeholder • Increased support for and real partnerships with CSOs and private sector organizations in the SPCR development engagement process, which continued at the implementation stage at the project level. • PPCR Steering Committee includes Samoa Umbrella for NGOs (SUNGO) and Chamber of Commerce as members to ensure information sharing, consultations and partnerships during the PPCR implementation. How did it help? • SUNGO has more than 100 members consisting of various organizations dealing with social issues, income generation, community development, climate change, special needs, church development. • CSOs’ close relationships with communities through sustained engagement and on going capacity building are key in building resilient communities. • CSO engagement was built into the design of the Enhancing Climate Resilience of Coastal Resources and Communities project through participatory prioritization of adaptation options and opportunities for CSOs to implement sub-projects in 16 PPCR districts . How will it sustain? • Strengthening of civil society participation in climate resilience activities during project implementation in 16 PPCR districts. • Opportunities to empower CSOs in 25 additional districts under the Coastal Communities Project supported by UNDP and Adaptation Fund. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L5: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 87 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary What to Do/Avoid Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L5: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 88 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Stakeholder Engagement  Identify stakeholders  Consider using and other , their and in as a tool for reaching out to geographically vulnerable areas. As needed larger set of stakeholders. Using ICT could greatly since resilience help in identifying risks and vulnerabilities building is everybody’s business. through  Ensure  Engage stakeholders such as women, farmers, and fishermen in , and enhance their through order to of the their involvement in consultation process. of the program. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L5: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 89 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Learn more The periodic dedicated learning and exchange fora among pilot countries have proven especially valuable. These help build credibility and professionalism of participants while sharing practical experiences and engendering shared South-South experiences and across networks of expertise. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L6: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 90 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Sub-Lessons Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L6: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 91 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary PPCR Lessons on Learning & Exchange  Regular which are a part of  Significant the PPCR business model have enabled governments and (e.g., on climate services other stakeholders from all PPCR pilots to share through workshops, international conferences, and an e- knowledge, learning module) has among both and have sector experts and policy planners/decision makers. empowered champions for the PPCR within the pilot countries.  webinars, events for civil society and private sector, monitoring and reporting training  Where countries have multiple programs (e.g., two CIF . programs—PPCR and SREP) these fora provide a at an early stage of their  To be most effective, knowledge and planning and programming (e.g., in Nepal) during the strategic planning and project design stages  among countries on targeted . topics (e.g., Zambia-Bolivia on early warning systems for DRM; Tajikistan, Nepal and Bolivia study tour on climate risks in mountainous countries; Central Asia/Tajikistan and China on Hydromet) Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L6: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 92 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Case Studies Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L6: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 93 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Zambia and Niger: Using Radio Programs and Social Media to Engage on Resilience Key aspects of outreach • Based on the high use of social media, and wide use of radio in all parts of the countries, Facebook, Twitter and radio programs were and communication used to communicate project related information to wider population. High numbers of posts and views demonstrate significant interest (Zambia). • In Zambia, through the Inter-Ministerial Climate Change Secretariat, Under Ministry of Finance, the program has developed an extensive social media strategy. • In Niger through the Program Coordination Unit, under Ministry of Planning, project and program related articles are routinely published in local newspapers and external websites. • Zambia successfully held the first ever Climate Change Media Awards where journalists were recognized for their accurate and quality reporting of climate change issues on the radio, TV and other forms of press media. • Radio and TV programs have live phone-in programs where people are able to discuss how climate change has impacted their daily lives and in Niger decision makers are also interviewed on the planned interventions. Radio shows journalists have been trained on climate change reporting. How did it help? • With social media and the radio different types of audience could be reached. • Media strategy has allowed for 100% coverage on replies to comments and posts, keeping audience more engaged in climate change topics. • District planners, project implementers, can share information and media material directly and instantly. • Impact of climate change and various coping mechanisms implemented in the projects are shared in form of talk shows, stories, photos and blogs. • The challenges faced while implementing a climate change related project is clearer and viewers and listeners have an avenue to share how climate change is affecting them. • There has been increased coverage of climate change in the media. How will it sustain? • The approach cultivates awareness and interest by allowing citizen journalism where ordinary members of the public can directly report on how climate change is affecting them. Part of this approach include community climate champion initiatives. • Media engagement has demonstrated increased appetite for climate change related information and appreciation for a platform to voice concerns on the topic. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L6: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 94 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary What to Do/Avoid Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L6: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 95 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Learning and Exchange  Identify knowledge and learning objectives at the  Move publication and the as strategic planning and project design phases and dissemination outlets and design and implement communications strategies to activities (including real-time learning , radio, and other outlets from projects). accessible to beneficiaries.  Identify and put in place appropriate  Consider from the outset the of (for task teams and country teams) approaches into projects and seek partners to carry this out (e.g., Incentives could DIME). include “carrots” such as cash or other prizes and “sticks” such as reporting requirements.  Coordinate with other task teams to and pursue on targeted topics. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L6: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 96 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Learn more Upfront technical assistance and targeted advisory services have been critical for overcoming barriers to engaging the private sector on climate resilience. This includes piloting new modalities of climate adaptation, validating their commercial viability, and creating an enabling environment for successful investments. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L7: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 97 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Sub-Lessons Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L7: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 98 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary PPCR Lessons on Engaging the Private Sector  was available in the medium term. in low income countries coupled with the novelty of adaptation can constrain  Assessments of climate risks to key economic sectors private sector interest to invest. PPCR-funded advisory which are targeted to a private sector audience can be services/technical assistance projects have been used to raise awareness and demonstrated as essential to address these constraints and opportunities in a country- by piloting new modalities of climate adaptation, specific context. validate their commercial viability, and create an enabling environment for successful investments.  (IFC/PPCR in , , and in climate resilience from Mozambique; and EBRD/PPCR in Tajikistan). high/middle-income countries, where the formal private sector has greater breadth and capacity to invest in  Private sector operations climate resilience measures, adapted to address the than public ones. Consequently, the needs of low-income country contexts. (EBRD in consultation process during PPCR Phase 1 was too long ). and therefore it did not match the private sector’s needs. Nevertheless, private sector demonstrated interest to engage in and participate on multi-sector plans and discussions when the possibility of funding Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L7: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 99 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Case Studies Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L7: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 100 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Niger: Building a Market for Investments in Irrigation Country/sector context • Niger is one of the poorest countries in the world, and also one of the most vulnerable countries to climate change. • The country is dry and is predicted to get drier with changes in climate. • Increased access to improved irrigation will make Niger's agricultural sector more resilient and enhance food security for the country. It will enable Nigerien farmers to protect their crops and livelihoods despite longer dry seasons and unexpected weather events (such as heat waves). It will also improve productivity and promote more efficient use of the country’s water resources. • Most irrigation schemes in Niger have typically been established through public interventions with little view toward financial viability and are not sustainable once donor-sponsored projects come to a close. Market barriers Currently, private sector has limited participation in irrigation in Niger and market conditions do not exist for fully commercial businesses to operate. Some key market barriers are: • Local banks are reluctant to provide financing for agriculture and irrigation because they perceive it as too risky. • Irrigation equipment finance requires collateral and good cash flows, which smallholder farmers are unable to provide. • Local irrigation equipment providers have limited access to finance and few distribution outlets. • Limited awareness of the benefits of improved irrigation and minimal capacity to operate the equipment. Market transformation The IFC-PPCR advisory services program aims to address the above market barriers by proving the commercial viability, adoption and sustainability of improved irrigation systems in Niger. The project will promote access to and use of affordable, efficient irrigation equipment by smallholder farmers and draw in an established irrigation company to enter or expand their presence in the Nigerian market. The program aims to provide clear evidence of the benefits from commercial, sustainable irrigation systems that are needed to encourage private sector interest to scale up and increase the impacts of the program. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L7: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 101 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Nepal and Bangladesh: Demonstrating the Economic Viability for Climate Smart Agriculture Country/sector context • Nepal and Bangladesh are among the most vulnerable to climate change in the world, and the agriculture sector accounts for 30% and 20% of the countries’ respective GDP. • Agricultural productivity in these countries is expected to be highly affected by climate change and contribute to serious food security risks. • Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) can reduce climate risks and increase profitability offering opportunities to farmers and agribusiness to sustainably adapt to climate change. Market barriers Although there are emerging business opportunities and proven CSA technologies globally, the private sector in Bangladesh and in Nepal has not yet tapped into these opportunities nor built the capacity to offer CSA technologies and services to farmers due to some key barriers: • Private sector has been generally risk averse to invest in CSA due to the lack of demonstrated demand, high risk and high operational costs entailed in adopting new technologies/new business models; • Farmers lack access to CSA products and extension services; • Limited access to weather related information and early warning systems; • Limited access to finance and available financial products for farmers and agribusiness companies. Market transformation IFC-PPCR advisory services programs aim to address the barriers listed above by working with key agribusiness companies, farmers, and supply chain members. The goal of the programs is to increase farmer productivity and revenues through the adoption of climate smart agribusiness technologies and practices. The programs are demonstrating the business case for CSA that can be scaled up with private investments and help increase the agriculture sector’ capacity to cope with climate change. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L7: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 102 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Tajikistan: Targeted Climate Change Impact Assessment to Promote Investments in Key Economic Sectors Country/sector context • Tajikistan is the most vulnerable country to the impacts of climate change in the Europe and Central Asia region. The Tajik economy is fundamentally dependent on the use of highly climate-sensitive resources—water, energy and land— that face considerable challenges due to climate change and poor management. • Agriculture employs two-thirds of the working population and generates one-quarter of GDP. It is adversely affected by insecure supplies of water and power, and by land degradation. • Water infrastructure is in a deteriorated state, particularly agricultural irrigation, which accounts for 91% of total water consumption. • The Tajik private sector (i.e., businesses, farmers and households) is adversely affected by variable, low-quality supplies of water, energy and land, and by their inefficient use of these resources. • Businesses and manufacturing companies are badly impacted by severe power shortages that lead to foregone revenues, lower quality outputs and damage to equipment. Barriers • Knowledge gaps and lack of awareness about improved technologies, lack of skilled specialists. • High cost of medium term financing. • Low energy and water tariffs create limited incentives for private companies to invest in resource efficiency. Market transformation • Market and sector studies on climate change risks were used to design EBRD-PPCR program—a financing facility for the private sector to adopt and implement adaptation measures in key economic sectors. During the pilot stage, the facility will be supported by a comprehensive technical assistance for partner financial institutions and end-used (sub- borrowers). • The EBRD will also undertake policy dialogue in the area of water and energy pricing reforms, and work with the Government to integrate climate resilience into energy and water infrastructure planning. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L7: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 103 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Tajikistan: Adopting Private Sector Adaptation Experiences to Build Climate Resilience in Tajik Hydropower Sector Country/sector context • Tajikistan’s hydropower (HP) plants depend on river basins fed by glacial melt water and snowmelt. As the climate warms, most climate models predict significant changes in the dynamics of the Tajik precipitation patterns as well as alterations to the country’s glaciers. • These impacts have serious implications for power generation capacity as well as management of peak supply and peak demand. • 98 percent of Tajikistan’s electricity originates from hydroelectric sources; however the country's HP sector is in a state of crisis—during winter months, approximately 70 percent of the population suffers from extensive electricity shortages. This results in economic losses of approximately US$200 million per year, or three percent of the country’s GDP. • The social impacts include severe indoor air pollution from burning coal and wood in homes and health impacts from extreme winters. Barriers • Weak financial capacity of HP operators. • Climate change considerations not incorporated in business planning. • Hydrological and metrological data not well recorded and limited in scope – this makes modelling future climate trends more difficult. Market transformation • International best practice from HP operators from an OECD country are being used to inform the design and implementation of the EBRD-PPCR project. • EBRD resources blended with PPCR resources include investments and technical assistance/advisory services targeted at integrating climate resilience into hydropower plants’ operations. It includes: (i) delivery of technical workshops for the private sector about climate diagnostics, climate risk assessment and seasonal forecasting, (ii) adoption of technologies and practices to maximize energy production, minimize spills and optimize dam safety; and (iii) facilitation for data management and information sharing. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L7: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 104 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary What to Do/Avoid Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L7: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 105 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary  (e.g., free and easy and/or private financing instruments and access to climate and hydrological projections). mechanisms).  (e.g., multi-  stakeholder coordinating agencies for climate (e.g., climate change adaptation change adaptation in private sector). technologies and/or process innovation are produced, sold and/or promoted in the private  (e.g., building standards and/or codes sector). and local zoning rules);  (e.g., access to public Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L7: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 106 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary  Develop climate risks assessments of key economic  For more information on a comprehensive Index sectors targeted to a private sector audience—to Framework to assess a country's level of favorable raise awareness and map concrete investment needs conditions that should be in place for climate and opportunities in a country-specific context. change adaptation in the private sector, click here.  Seek transferrable/replicable private sector  Reference: Stenek, Vladimir; Amado, J. C; Greenall, investment experiences in climate resilience from D. 2013. Enabling Environment for Private Sector high/middle-income countries; adapt these to Adaptation: An Index Framework. International address the needs of low-income countries. Finance Corporation.  Consider the need to provide upfront and ongoing technical assistance/advisory services to the private sector—pilot new modalities of climate adaptation, validate their commercial viability, promote awareness in collaboration with trade associations and leading companies, and create an enabling environment for successful investments. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L7: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 107 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Learn more The simplified set of 5 core resilience indicators for PPCR monitoring and reporting is seen as a practical and viable framework and several countries are beginning to see the benefits of tracking overall national progress towards resilient development. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L8: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 108 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Sub-Lessons “Having a nationally owned monitoring and reporting system for resilience has helped us to Learn more organize different processes, and more importantly, streamline monitoring of all climate change adaptation actions in Nepal to facilitate continuous learning.” — Mahendra Man Gurung, Joint Secretary, Ministry of Science, Technology & Environment, Nepal Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L8: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 109 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary PPCR Lessons on Monitoring and Reporting  PPCR, through its flexible, continuous learning has can increase the of that provide a monitoring indicators (e.g. , ). for countries to on resilience at the national level.  have been vital to build  The in countries on M&R for climate resilience to track and undertake these processes annually. , against self defined baselines are successfully providing (e.g., . , , , ) for resilience.  for scoring each indicator, building on the work of one country (Grenada), are being applied across the countries to ensure a for scoring progress of indicators against baselines.  Inclusive and targeted Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L8: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 110 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary PPCR Lessons on Monitoring and Reporting The five core indicators to track programmatic progress on resilience are: 1. Degree of Integration of climate change in national, including sector, planning. 2. Evidence of strengthened government capacity and coordination mechanism to mainstream climate resilience. 3. Quality and extent to which climate responsive instruments/investment models are developed and tested. 4. Extent to which vulnerable households, communities, businesses and public sector services use improved PPCR supported tools, instruments, strategies and activities to respond to climate variability or climate change. 5. Number of people supported by the PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L8: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 111 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Case Studies Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L8: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 112 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Zambia: Programmatic M&R Building on National System Key aspects of • PPCR programmatic M&R mechanism building on the country’s national monitoring and reporting system. programmatic M&R • Consultative approach to determine baselines and targets on PPCR core indicators; reporting on these indicators on an annual basis. • Dedicated resources. • Key vulnerable sectors are clearly identified for the purpose of tracking progress for integration of resilience. How did it help? • Supported strengthening of national M&R processes to avoid parallel M&R systems only for PPCR. • Cultivated ownership at all levels within the country through targeted workshops, including representatives from Government, Private Sector and Civil Society Organizations (CSOs). • Helped clarify the roles and responsibilities related to programmatic M&R from the Inter-ministerial Secretariat to provincial officers to NGOs and Private Sector to beneficiary communities. • Provided a platform to collect and track progress in climate change activities beyond PPCR. How will it sustain? • The fact that Zambia is strengthening its own national M&R system, introducing the capability to monitor and report on PPCR core indicators, the system is likely to continue to support country-level M&R on resilience beyond the duration of the PPCR program. • Improved communication between actions occurring at multiple geographic levels—a framework that will make it reliable and useful for all. • Continued support to improve quantitative robustness Other countries with • Mozambique: building on national M&R system. comparable structures? • Saint Lucia: broad based consultation at the local level Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L8: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 113 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Mozambique: Embedding Resilience Indicators into the National Monitoring and Evaluation Framework Key aspects of • M&R as a clear government priority, which is reflected in concrete actions beyond the PPCR in terms of Climate Change programmatic M&R DPO series. • Establishment by the National Sustainable Development Council (CONDES) of dedicated Climate Change Unit (UMC) with clear roles and responsibilities for monitoring and reporting. • Development of a national climate change M&E framework for PPCR, fully integrating with the national development M&E framework, which is under development by the Ministry of Planning. How did it help? • Reinforced national processes to strengthen capacity for PPCR M&R and other national and international-level reporting. • Likely to improve formulation of future policies and programs in the longer-term by learning from past implementation. How will it sustain? • Integrating the national-level M&R framework for climate change with national development M&R framework. • Expected to improve access and accountability in use of domestic and international climate finance, including GCF. Other countries with • Zambia: Building on national M&R system. comparable structures? • Nepal: expected to allow for M&R beyond the PPCR projects. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L8: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 114 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Nepal: Broad Participation Yields National Programmatic M&R Framework Key aspects of • Climate Change Program Results Management Framework (RMF) includes non-PPCR projects. programmatic M&R • The RMF was developed in a participatory manner with consultation with executing agencies responsible for PPCR and non-PPCR climate change related projects, National Planning Council, key line ministries including Ministry of Finance, and development partners. • Climate Change Projects Coordination (CCPC) was set up to facilitate collaboration across ministries and development partners and information flow. How did it help? • A combined RMF to measure progress across programs (PPCR, NAPA) means a single monitoring system is used. • The RMF combined an indicator based approach with qualitative and consultative lessons learned approach. • Government taking on a programmatic response to managing climate change adaptation through CPCC’s efforts. How will it sustain? • The RMF is country owned, developed through a national consultative process. • CCPC led by Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment (MOSTE) also has responsibility as Designated National Authority to UNFCCC. Other countries with • Mozambique has a National M&R process with PPCR embedded into it. comparable structures? Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L8: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 115 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Saint Lucia: Extensive Stakeholder Engagement for Shaping a National M&R Framework Key aspects of • Establishment of baselines and targets on core indicators and reporting on an annual basis. programmatic M&R • Guidance through training workshop on PPCR M&R in Saint Lucia, targeting all PPCR countries in the Caribbean. • Ensuring broad participation by stakeholders in finalizing the scoring criteria and completion of the PPCR Scorecards — e.g., ministries of finance, agriculture, fisheries, forestry, infrastructure, transport, housing, water, sustainable development and environment, education, labor, trade, aviation, health, and gender relation; as well as met services, insurance council, public utilities, and National Emergency Management Organization. • Development and implementation of the national M&R framework, aligned with WB and PPCR M&R processes. How did it help? • Initiated a participatory process for consultation across large and diverse stakeholder base at the country level which helped increase the ownership of programmatic M&R process and appreciate the utility of monitoring indicators at the program level. • Reinforced existing multi-sector National Climate Change Committee (NCCC), comprising governmental and non- governmental organizations, which coopted additional members from Civil Society during the PPCR scoring process. How will it sustain? • NCCC is well established (in operation since 1998) and recognized by relevant agencies, and as such, participation of members (including co-opted) at meetings is high. • Validation mechanism by local stakeholder groups will ensure broad-based support for the M&R framework. Other countries with • Nepal: broad consultation with line ministries and development partners. comparable structures? Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L8: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 116 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary What to Do/Avoid Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L8: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 117 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary  Consider strengthening the existing national  Consider to broader stakeholder climate resilience M&R system, by groups─NGOs, CSOs, private sector, other to relevant agencies─in the programmatic M&R ensure coordination and avoid duplication (e.g., process to guarantee Zambia, Mozambique). and ensure flexibility (e.g., St. Lucia).  Sustainability of core indicators relies on the  resilience in high level and not the other way around and policies to (e.g., Nepal, Mozambique). strengthen in-country institutional and technical capacity (e.g., Mozambique, Nepal).  Establish a to engage with key stakeholders—line ministries, MDBs, bilateral partners, etc.─to set the baselines and targets for climate resilience and the and to report on resilience indicators annually (e.g., Nepal, Mozambique, St. Lucia). Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L8: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 118 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Learn more Program implementation allowed for consistency in goal and outcome within a flexible and responsive framework considering country capacities, political structures, and overall development regimes. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L9: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 119 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Sub-Lessons Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L9: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 120 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Responsive, Country-based Approach to Climate Resilience Planning  Program implementation allowed for consistency  The PPCR played a catalytic role in countries where in goal and outcome (e.g., SPCR) within a flexible adaptation planning was nascent (e.g., Tajikistan). and responsive framework considering country capacities, political structures, and overall  Countries even outside the PPCR program found development regimes. the e-framework helpful for advancing national resilience (e.g., ).  Countries with advanced adaptation planning before the PPCR were able to move more quickly to Phase 2 (e.g., Bangladesh). Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L9: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 121 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Case Studies Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L9: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 122 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Belize: Shaping National Resilience by Following PPCR Business Model Key aspects • Belize was not selected in the first round of PPCR countries under the Caribbean regional program but experiences similar disasters (hurricanes, floods, landslides) and was keen on learning from the PPCR experience. • Roads sector of particular need for bolstered resilience; sole Bank Country Assistance Strategy pillar was on increased resilience. • Benefitted from a GFDRR trust fund grant (reaching $1.2 million). • Developed a strategic vision and plan for resilience based on the PPCR model (high level coordination, stakeholder engagement, and linkages with other MDBs). • National Climate Resilience and Investment Plan similar to SPCR. How did it help? • Greatly advanced national planning and served as catalyst for IBRD loan within a much larger overall $43 million roads sector investment plan. • Put a spotlight on the need to update design standards. How will it sustain? • Promising as National Plan was formally endorsed by Cabinet. • Bank technical assistance likely to help on design standards. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L9: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 123 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Learn more Regional approaches have the potential for bolstering country-based programming with implementation synergies. National-level strategy linked with concrete investments ensured sustained engagement with countries. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L10: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 124 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Sub-Lessons Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L10: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 125 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Nurturing Ownership in Regional Programs (1)  Regional programs are most useful when countries  Regional actions on climate resilience need to face related to vulnerability to climate change. The benefit of a . Countries participating in a regional program regional plan of climate resilience activities needs to should be fully engaged in the development of be strong and clear to create national as well as regional plans for climate resilience. Regional regional ownership of investment activities, program needs to support the development and including (i) common issues of interest; (ii) implementation of climate investments in countries transformative impact of the regional component; participating in the regional program (Caribbean and (iii) potential benefits of activities beyond the and Pacific). interest of one country. Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L10: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 126 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Nurturing Ownership in Regional Programs (2)  A combination of linked country-based programs transparent and inclusive process. The Caribbean and a regional component can promote stronger regional program has developed a governance ownership, development of common standards and mechanism which includes regional organizations, sharing of knowledge for greater climate resilience selected countries participating benefiting from the action. Regional organizations can play a critical program and donor organizations. This mechanism role in developing tools and trainings for effective has allowed for accountability and transparency in capacity building at country and regional level in decision-making and coordination of climate the adaptation field (such as climate data resilient activities that respond to country needs. availability, exchange/protocols, storage and access). A regional program should build on existing climate resilience efforts and countries participating . in a program should instead of reinventing or duplicating effort. .  A transparent and inclusive governance mechanism for a regional program should be established, with an appropriate regional institution leading a Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L10: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 127 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary What to Do/Avoid Learn more Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L10: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 128 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary  Identify key champions/leaders at both the mechanisms for regional mechanisms national and regional level—and ensure broad implementation which should ensure capacity based stakeholder engagement. enhancement and information transfer to national programs.  Allow the national consultations to proceed first so that national priorities, challenges and  Open and continuous dialogue channels concerns inform the regional program. throughout the process for effective delivery.  Explore together areas of regional synergies and Lessons Quick Links: Lessons: L10: A) Sub-Lessons B) Case Studies C) What-to-Do/Avoid 129 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Summary Quick Links: 1 ) Recognizing Constraints 2) What-to-do & What-to-avoid Summaries 3) Sources 4) Acknowledgments 130 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Learn more Summary Quick Links: 1 ) Recognizing Constraints 2) What-to-do & What-to-avoid Summaries 3) Sources 4) Acknowledgments 131 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Critical constraints for the PPCR to date  Attention at senior-most levels of Government governance structures. can be hard to maintain going from planning to implementation (phase 2), though capable  Expectations for private sector engagement line ministries can advance mainstreaming. were overly optimistic.  Formal leveraging with other development  Considerable time and effort lost with initial partners can take considerable time and overly ambitious M&R framework. patience. Differing MDB project preparation processes and timeframes are hard to  Modalities and benefits for regional overcome. approaches still unclear.  MDBs challenged by meeting additional expectations stemming from overall CIF/PPCR Summary Quick Links: 1 ) Recognizing Constraints 2) What-to-do & What-to-avoid Summaries 3) Sources 4) Acknowledgments 132 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Learn more “In Mozambique, our road sector has effectively leveraged and linked PPCR resources with policy reforms, allowing the country to apply better designs and standards to road resilience.” — Rogerio Wamusse, Executive Secretary, Council on Sustainable Development (CONDES), Mozambique Summary Quick Links: 1 ) Recognizing Constraints 2) What-to-do & What-to-avoid Summaries 3) Sources 4) Acknowledgments 133 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Summary of Takeaway Actions: “What to Do” for Effective Climate Resilience Planning  Find the at the highest level of with other MDBs, bilaterals government; one who can see across sectors and non-government groups. It’s extra work and directly influence development planning. but can be extremely effective in leveraging institutional strengths and funding.  Recognize that there is always a base of information on climate risks and  Develop climate risks assessments of vulnerabilities to advance resilience planning. targeting to a private Nearly all countries will benefit from sector audience—to raise awareness and map investments and capacity building for concrete investment needs and opportunities in a country-specific context.  Consider a Summary Quick Links: 1 ) Recognizing Constraints 2) What-to-do & What-to-avoid Summaries 3) Sources 4) Acknowledgments 134 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Summary of Takeaway Actions: “What to Do” for Effective Climate Resilience Planning  across priority sectors and developed under the geographically vulnerable areas. Ensure PPCR as a way to track advances in climate representation of specific vulnerable groups such as resilience at the national level. women, farmers, and fishermen in order to enhance the effectiveness of the consultation process.  Consider the need to provide upfront and  Consider and other existing —pilot new modalities of ICT platforms for reaching out to a larger set of climate adaptation, validate their commercial stakeholders. Using ICT could greatly help in viability, promote awareness, and create an identifying risks and vulnerabilities through crowd enabling environment for successful investments. sourcing.  Consider integrating Summary Quick Links: 1 ) Recognizing Constraints 2) What-to-do & What-to-avoid Summaries 3) Sources 4) Acknowledgments 135 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Summary of Takeaway Actions: “What to Avoid” for Effective Climate Resilience Planning  —integrating climate and disaster risk  that countries will fully embrace into development is a process that takes time, from resilience M&R without their full understanding of the initiation of new pilots and coordination the benefits for integration into broader development structures, to scaling up from lessons-learned. planning.  on an intra/inter-ministerial coordination  Expectations that the will engage if mechanism without a track record for fostering cross- the sector is nascent and/or resilience benefits are sector dialogue, influencing investments, and not presented clearly. fostering substantive change.  Barring a mandate through a multi-donor process, an that all development partners will fully coordinate their efforts, especially without a “champion” from the country.  that stakeholder consultation is only required at the early stages; it needs to be sustained. Summary Quick Links: 1 ) Recognizing Constraints 2) What-to-do & What-to-avoid Summaries 3) Sources 4) Acknowledgments 136 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Learn more Summary Quick Links: 1 ) Recognizing Constraints 2) What-to-do & What-to-avoid Summaries 3) Sources 4) Acknowledgments 137 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Sources of Information Consultations  With PPCR task teams to tease out the key lessons and validate country and project examples  With task teams for IDA-17 Multi-Sectoral Plans (MSP) to explore synergies and relevance of lessons from PPCR Documentations  Independent evaluation of Climate Investment Funds (ICF International, June 2014) • Reflecting field visits to 3 PPCR countries • Evaluates country-specific Strategic Programs for Climate Resilience (SPCRs) • Includes annexes  Lessons from PPCR Phase 1 for Enhancing Climate-Resilient Development (C. Bann, 2014 Final Draft) • Includes country-specific responses to questionnaire  Presentations, notes and supplementary materials from PPCR meetings (including country self- assessments) (https://www.climateinvestmentfunds.org) Summary Quick Links: 1 ) Recognizing Constraints 2) What-to-do & What-to-avoid Summaries 3) Sources 4) Acknowledgments 138 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Learn more Summary Quick Links: 1 ) Recognizing Constraints 2) What-to-do & What-to-avoid Summaries 3) Sources 4) Acknowledgments 139 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Mobilizing Climate Resilience – Key Lessons and Good Practices from the PPCR is a product of a joint effort of the World Bank Group and the Climate Investment Fund. It is based on extensive consultation and collaboration with multiple task teams across the World Bank. The core team, led by Kanta Kumari Rigaud, consisted of Ronald Hoffer, Kazi Fateha Ahmed, Laura Gaensly Cordeiro, Shaanti Kapila, Junu Shrestha and Akshatvishal Rohitshyam Chaturvedi. Valuable guidance and oversight was provided by James Close, Jane Ebinger and Markus Repnik. We are grateful to the following colleagues, who have been involved in the Pilot Program for Climate Resilience at the World Bank, for their valuable contributions: Angela G. Armstrong, Arati Belle, Dora Nsuwa Cudjoe, Chris Philip Fischer, Bougadare Kone, Marie-Laure Lajaunie, Nancy Chaarani Meza, Dahlia Lotayef, Robin Mearns, Iretomiwa Olatunji, Poonam Pillai, Stefanie Sieber and Zoe Elena Trohanis. We acknowledge with gratitude Raffaello Cervigni, Habiba Gitay, Venkat Gopalakrishnan, Niels Holm-Nielsen, Ross Hughes, Daniel Mira-Salama, Paola Ridolfi, Ana Campos Garcia, Philippe Ambrosi, Christian Albert Peter, Stephen Ling, Dahlia Lotayef; Paola Agostini; Stephen Danyo; Jean Baptiste Migraine; and Carl Christian Dingel for their insightful feedback, including on the Multi-Sectoral Plans for IDA 17. Summary Quick Links: 1 ) Recognizing Constraints 2) What-to-do & What-to-avoid Summaries 3) Sources 4) Acknowledgments 140 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Photo Credits: Slide 1, Cover image: Nepal/Climate Investment Funds Slide 4, Introduction image: World Bank Group Slides 29 & 30, Top Ten Lessons image: World Bank Group Slide 39, Lesson 1: Country Case Studies image: Zambia/World Bank Group Slide 50, Lesson 2: Country Case Studies image: World Bank Group Slide 60, Lesson 3: Country Case Studies image: World Bank Group Slide 71, Lesson 4: Country Case Studies image: World Bank Group Slide 80, Lesson 5: Country Case Studies image: World Bank Group Slide 92, Lesson 6: Country Case Studies image: World Bank Group Slide 99, Lesson 7: Country Case Studies image: World Bank Group Slide 111, Lesson 8: Country Case Studies image: World Bank Group Slide 121, Lesson 9: Country Case Studies image: World Bank Group Slide 131, Summary of Takeaway Actions image: Zambia/World Bank Group Summary Quick Links: 1 ) Recognizing Constraints 2) What-to-do & What-to-avoid Summaries 3) Sources 4) Acknowledgments 141 NAV: Home | Contents | Introduction | Top 10 Lessons: L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | Summary Summary Quick Links: 1 ) Recognizing Constraints 2) What-to-do & What-to-avoid Summaries 3) Sources 4) Acknowledgments