bond;access to public good;household social capital;measures of central tendency;Public and Private Institution;Public Goods;rural area;household and individual;perception ...  See More + of poverty;experience of poverty;religious group;monolingual indigenous people;difference in poverty;source of income;parcel of land;share of export;line of defense;capacity of community;loss of income;impact of poverty;adoption of policy;formal coordination mechanisms;exploitation of resource;higher education level;source income;forms of participation;safety net mechanism;power to negotiate;perceptions of risk;Access to Education;kind of collective;measuring social capital;common pool resource;freedom of association;decades of war;quantitative data;ethnic group;community activity;empirical evidence;metropolitan region;participation rate;external assistance;Indigenous Peoples;indigenous group;consumption aggregate;quantitative evidence;indigenous communities;Natural Resources;labor agreement;rural resident;urban dweller;indigenous community;privileged groups;focus group;special interest;poor household;information campaign;Civil War;national-level poverty;social interaction;judicial authority;community construction;qualitative data;horizontal associations;common land;household level;poverty profile;indigenous population;community participation;risky activity;social network;social mapping;demographic group;school committee;professional association;income inequality;indigenous household;Community Services;population group;poor villagers;social resource;consumption quintile;household head;household characteristic;informal exchange;urban household;legal title;Social organizations;community initiative;authoritarian leadership;causal relationship;logistic regression;community needs;cross-country study;community level;negative effect;local politician;rural community;social skill;external influence;medium levels;old people;ethnic heterogeneity;political power;better-off household;working schedule;community meetings;community authority;citizenship right;National Institutions;credit system;vicious cycle;school lunch;female participation;domestic chore;raise funds;agricultural production;precautionary measure;primary income;security system;consensus building;informal norm;common resources;irrigation system;communal land;informal mechanism;Technology Diffusion;Economic Mobility;preferential policies;private benefit;Extractive Industry;free-rider problem;youth gang;public policy;ethnic origin;religious affiliations;central regions;community cohesion;primary source;demographic characteristic;valuable asset;empirical literature;electoral campaigns;rural village;local researcher;household income;non-governmental organization;business association;teacher association;garbage collection;community perceptions;neighborhood committee;youth group;physical asset;geographic region;income generation;neighborhood association;qualitative research;national poverty;community characteristic;quantitative analysis;college graduate;dynamic process;quantitative survey;case history;household data;Coping Mechanisms;sample selection;natural disaster;public program;married couple;income equality;executive power;empirical research;welfare level;household expenditure;greater access;Agricultural Extension;social relationship;empirical study;oecd countries;development policy;selection bias;health clinics;mixed methods;quantitative method;employment prospect;destructive behavior;criminal organization;power relation;economic efficiency;local association;trade union;regional disparity;rural population;urban population;credit group;material resource;economic liability;government service;ethnic diversity;social sanctions;asymmetric information;transaction cost;social trust;credit constraint;legal system;assessment program;piped water;operational expense;secure access;Public Services;household survey;water scarcity;voluntary work;preventive measure;downward bias;animal use;regional variation  See Less -