RP-50 LEBANESE REPUBLIC COUNCIL FOR DEVELOPMENT AND RECONSTRUCTION BEIRUT URBAN TRANSPORT PROJECT RESETTLEMENT PLAN FINAL DRAFT July 14, 2000 B 13 B - consultants P.O.1B 145303, BEIRUT-LEBANON - TEL (01) 840414 - FAX (01) 826593 LEBANESE REPUBLIC COUNCIL FOR DEVELOPMENT AND RECONSTRUCTION BEIRUT URBAN TRANSPORT PROJECT RESETTLEMENT PLAN FINAL DRAFT July 14, 2000 t-e av INTERNATIONAL lill _engineer'ing & manangement consultants P.O.B 145 303. BEIRUT-LEBANON - TEL (01) 840414 - FAX (01) 826593 TABLE OF C'ONTENTS SUMMARY OF RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN.1......................................................................... SECTION 1: KEY PROVISIONS OF THE RESETTLENMENT ACTION PLAN ...........................2 SECTION 2: DETAILED RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN ...........................................................6 A. INTRODUCTION A. I Suninrina and Objectives of Resettlement Action Plan ..................................6........ ................ 6 A.2 The Extent of Land Acquisition and Efforts to Mininize It ...........8................................................8 A.3 The Impacts of Land Acquisition ........ ............................................................... 8 B. OBJECTIVES OF THE RESETTLENIENT ACTION PLAN C. SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND OTHER STUDIES C. I Census of affected population ..................................... .................................. I I C 2 Socio-Economic Sur%-e% ....................................................................... 12 C. 3 Land Tenure and transfer ....................................................................... 14 C.4 Expropriation lawv and procedures ............................ ......... ............................ 15 D. INSTITUTIONAL SETTING D. I The Expropriation Conmrissions and the Appeals Comnmission ...........................8........ 18 D.2 CDR as Expropriating Agency.....18 D. 2 CDR as Expropnatin -genc ............I..................... ................................................ 1 8 D.3 Displaced Peoples Fund ....................................................................... 18 E. ELIGIBILITY TO AND VALUATION OF COMPENSATION E. I Eligibilit .20............................................................... . ..... 20 E .2 Payment of Compensatiorn Vacation and Taking Possession of Propert- . . ........................................ 27 E.3 Grievances. Appeals and Disputes ....................................................................... 28 F. INMPLENIENTATION: NIEASURES, BUDGET, MIONITORING AND EVALUATION F I Process and Steps ....................................................................... 28 F.2 Notes for Site Expropriation Application and Clearance ................................................ .................. 30 APPENDIX A: TABLES APPENDIX B: SITE PLANS, LISTS AND PliOTOCRAPIIS LISTI OF TAB LES Table 1. Loss of Residcntial Accomninodation. . . Table 2. Loss of Business Premises. )9 Table 3: Entitlemiienit Matrix I - Residence . . Table 4: Entitlcment Matrix 2 - Business Prenises. 23 Table 5: Entitlemiient Matrix 3 - Business Minor Impacis. 24 Table 6: Entitlement Matrix 4 - Land Onl ..... APPENDIX A SUPPLEMENTARY TABLES Table Al: Residents Affected Bv Resettlement Table A2: Mobilitv of Residents Affected By Resettlentent Table A3: Status of Active Businesses requiring Resettlement Table A4: Mobilitv of Small Business Entrepreneurs to be Resettled Table A5: Legal Status of Rented Occupied Residence! and Businesses to be Resettled Table A6: Businesses affected by Minor Impacts (no Resettlement) Table A7 Land Expropriation: Classification by Impact and Entitlement Table A8: Cost ($ '000) of Resettlement components anid Options Schedule 1: Beit al-Atfal Schedule 2: Bechara el-Khourn Schedule 3: Airport Schedule 4: Mucharrafieh Schedule 5: Mar Mekliael Schedule 6: Galerne Semaan Schedule 7: Tavounneh Schedule 8: Adlieh Schedule 9: Dora Schedulc 10: Havek Schedulc I 1: kkalles Schcdule 12: Bchamoun-Aramoun APPENDIX B SITE PLANS AND INVIENTORY OF AFFECTED PLOTS -[IRUT URBAN TRANSPORT PROJEC- Resettleme:t PlaFr CDP. ju14 ac SUIN1ARY OF RESETTLENMENT ACITION PLAN I The BeiuLt Urban Transport Project (BUTP) requires land expropriation by decree of '71 i mn of land fronm 20 lots for the constructioni of 12 grade separations. plus 4158 nm of land ulnder servitude from earlier decrees, to total 31.36c) m. This expropriation directly affects the residence of 42 occupant families (I1I persons), 33 businesses and about 1437 landowniers. 2. Lebanese law enshrines the principle of full and pnor compensation for land and other assets expropriated in the public interest. However, a special provision for roads and highways permits the taking of land by decree without monetary compensation for the first 25 percent of the original lot area, on the presumption that the owner will receive compensation through the increased value accruing to the property concerned. 3. In the case of BUTP, the provision that up to 25 percent of the land may be taken without monetary compensation is not fully applicable because the prior existence of the road has already created compensatory value added. Under BUTP, the additional expropriation to adjust the right-of- way (ROWV) in order to accommodate access roads parallel to works to be constructed within the existing intersection ROW, cannot be expected automatically to bring further value added to adjacent properties, although it may be shown in specific cases that some value may accrue to the remainder as a result of improvements. 4. With the exception of the owners of about 43 plots, all property owners who lose assets through expropriation would be expected to receive equitable compensation for lost value. The Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) indicates what this could comprise and how it would be determined. However, many cases would require individual evaluation, and in particular the owners of about 43 lots affected by expropriations that would total over 10,000 M2, would appear likely to lose significantly. Therefore the RAP provides for additional measures within the existing expropnation mechanisms, to ensure that owners receive the proper estimation and equitable compensation of the value of their losses. 5. These measures are as follows: (a) Where the BUTP alignment decrees (or associated implementation of earlier decrees) result in taking of any asset without automatic entitlement to compensation, the Expropriation Committees shall estimate the impact of the expropriation on the owner and provide equitable compensation for lost asset value. (b) To enable the Expropriation Commnittees to undertake this work (see (a)), a series of meetings at CDR were held with the committees to ensure their familiarity with the details of each decree, the specific features of the BUTP project, and the considerations that would apply and that they have at their disposal any necessary additional expertise. Within the context of the above, a letter dated June 8"h, 2000 from the Minister of Public Works, complemented by a letter dated June 16t , 2000 from the minister of Justice were addressed to the Bank reflecting their support to this matter, and urging CDR to assist the Expropriation Commissions to ensure appropriate compensation be made to right-holders who stand to lose. (c) The Expropriating Agency (CDR) will ensure the availability of funds sufficient for the estimated level of compensations awarded, 6 For each intersection, the Expropriating Agency will prepare a report that will document in a format agreed with the Bank the expropriation and compensation awarded in respect of each lot. Every intersection will require forrnal clearance bv the Bank. -_ ] URBAN TRANSPORT PROJ-- -e'8re1 Dij2 CO 3J D z l.X D SECTION 1: KE PROVISIONS OF TIlE RESETTLENIENTI ACTION PL.AN Sectioni I sumiriarizes the ke- provisions af the Resettlement Action Plani which are described In more detail in Sectlon 2. Statistical and tabulk r infornmationi and detailed site plans are presented in thio Annexes. S. Brief Description of the Project. Boirut's central place in the Lebanese economy is accompanied by severe and steadily growing trafl;c congestion, the result of a deficient transportation svstem. The Government of Lebanon's comprehensive Greater Beirut Area Transportation Plan (GBATP) addresses the most serious urban transport issues, analyzes needed investments through the year 2015, and recommends a large phased investment program. The proposed BUTP would support the GBATP in three key areas, namely (i) Traffic Management Improvement, (ii) Parking Improvement and (iii) a Corridor Improvement Program to improve traffic flow along major corridors and Beirut entrances. 9. The third component, the Corridor Improvement Program, would finance the construction of grade separations at 16 heavily congested intersections (see Figure A for general locations) of which 12 are the subject of this RAP.' Through traffic flows would be improved by the construction of six underpasses (Beit al-Atfal, Bechara el-Khoury2, Airport, Mar Mekhael, Tayouneh and Adlieh) and seven overpasses (Airport, Musharrafieh, Galerie Semaan, Dora, Hayek, Mkalles, and Bchamoun- Aramoun). Their locations are shown at Figure A above. 10. The extent and impacts of expropriation. The expropriation of land and property, based on preliminary design, are expected at 12 of the 16 intersections where grade separations will be constructed. These would require the expropriation of all or part of 9 structures, and of a total of 31,369 m2 surface area from about 205 lots, o which 4,158 m2 is already under servitude from decrees issued prior to this project. This Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) has been prepared by the Expropriating Authority, the Council for Development and Reconstruction (CDR). These expropriations are almost exclusively small excisions of strips and edges of property, and in the great majority of cases do not affect the use of the property. 11. This expropriation would affect 17 owner and tenant families (81 persons); 25 illegal occupants (100 persons), 6 enterprise owvners, 13 entrepreneurs renting premises, and 6 squatter businesses. Because of the highly fragmented nature of property ownership, 1188 land owners would be affected. The actual nature of the impacts, and the application of compensation, is analyzed further in this section, and in more detail in the main body of the report that follows. I '. Institutional Capacity. Lebanon has established and experienced institutions for managing expropriation and compensation in an independent and just manner. The key institutions involved are the independent Expropriation Commissions of the Beirut area, CDR, and the Lands Registry in the Ministrv of Finance. (a) The Expropriation Commissions, whose constitution and operation is described in detail later in the RAP, are independent judicial and professional bodies that decide authioritatively on all aspects of expropriation and compensation in accordance with a decree. The Commissions have much experience and expertise at their disposal, work with a high degree of professionalisn and autonomy, take a wide range of factors into consideration. make their decisions catrefully within the law and with great faimess to the affected persons, distribute the awards scrupulously among the holders of different rights, and faithfullv record and con-municate their decisions. There is a second tier w\hich constitutes an effective appeals process. No\ inctldcd are Samn; Solni Comdror 4 l and NMuscini mCorridor II. \xherei no land expropriation is neceded. the C\i1me rideil of, x%I\ trkwnTIL sutillclil to aceommodat.a the> separationis Also, the final configuration ol t\so more grad. scparalntoll. .Aiielias anid Jal cl-D)ih on thc n )nhrhn Corridor 19. had not becn approved at the time ol x\mtiimi diis lAI. anid the\ aire ailso C\c]Uded The la id reqClirements lor these ix%o are expected to he %erx small olso hjovn: as Sodeeoi -_ RUT URBAN TRANSPORT PROJ EC- -eset'lement Plan -DR July 14 200 (b) On thle administrative side. CDR as the Expropriating Agency also has a great deal of expertise at its disposal. It kno\\ s the terrain intilmately, deals withl its cases expeditiously and meticuloLislv. assists the Commissionis Nwith logistics and administrative matters, and respects and executes faithfully the decisions of the Coimmissionis. But it goes further than that. It also provides counseling and support to affected people, its officers are commintted to ensurinig that people are treated fairly and svmpathetically. (c) The Lands Registry (administrative and technical departments in the Mmistry of Finance) maintains the histoncal record of title by lot, instances of title deeds not found were very rare, although there is still a little cadastral updating work to keep up with subdivisions and expropriations. 13. Overall consistency between Lebanese Law and Bank Policy on Expropriation. Lebanon protects and defends the rights of all its citizens to the enjoyment of private property; and the law provides that no citizen may be depnved of the enjoyment of private property except when there is a decree of expropriation in the public interest, together with payment of prior and equitable compensation. To ensure this there are independent, judicial and professional institutions and an appeals process. 14. The historical record of the application of principles, procedures and outcomes in cases of compensation awarded according to the law, provides very satisfactory outcomes for owners and tenants of residences, business premises and businesses. Compensation for land taken in excess of 25 percent of the original area of a plot is also clearly adequate. 15. Illegal occupants. Although illegal occupants are not entitled to compensation under the law or through the operations of the Expropriation Commissions, the policy is to deal with such problems in a developmental way. Practical and administrative solutions are found to deal in an understanding and humane manner with cases of displaced people and others who are in occupation of property or land, without having legal rights. The objective is to provide them with assistance that will secure positive development outcomes, reduce poverty and improve living standards for affected persons, in Ine with their choices, resources and abilities. 16. Unresolved Expropriation Issue between the Government of Lebanon and the Bank. The Govemment of Lebanon is aware that there remains an unresolved issue of principle between it and the Bank in respect of the expropriation of land which this project requires. This RAP is presented as a workable solution for this particular project. The remainder of this section therefore sets out the unresolved issue, the approach to resolving the problem, and the elements of the proposed solution. 17. The Lebanese law of expropriation establishes general provision for full and prior compensation of expropriated assets, to which it makes an exception in the case of roads and public open spaces. On the basis that roads and public open spaces would bring improved value to adjacent properties, the law provides for an Alignment decree rather than an Expropriation decree, in w\hich case no monetary compensation is payable in respect of the first quarter (25 percent) expropriated from a lot's original surface. A Betterment Tax is provided for in law (1991) but has never been implemented, that would calculate and tax the benefit and offset expropnrations that did not attract monetary compensation. 18. This provision is inconsistent with the Bank's established safeguard policy, which require the Bank to ensure through an approved RAP submitted by the borrower, that in projects for which it lends money, full and prior compensation is paid for assets taken, as well for the transition costs incurred in the involuntary relocation of residences or economic activities. The Bank made the Government aware of this inconsistency dunng project preparation, and in a formal letter in March I ao, --T JRBAN. TRANSPOF- PF,CS-C ~-eszeSlerle Plan CDR Jul', '4, --J i aIn tie case of the BUTP (rade separation3. the Governme)cnt of Lebanonl accepts that it is yen> dIfficult to maintain the hypothesls of autonmatic Ialue added to expropriated propertiCs. that would Iust;fv the taking of up to 25 percent of a plot without monetary compensation This is because the piots have already benefited from i10ost of tie added value resultant fronm their being adjacent to long established major roads. The grade separations \xould be constructed withinl the long established right of way in highly developed urbani areas, requiiling only inlor adjustmenits and modificationis for teclnical reasons. Any compensatory value a ided to the remainder would have to be more specifically demonstrated and justified. 20. On the other hand, it would be unrealistic to propose prior and full compensation at the rates normally awarded by the Expropriation Commissian rates for all land taken. however minor, as would be the case where a decree of expropriation in the public interest is based on the general provisions of the Expropnration Law. Such a measure would just price the project out of the market, adding an additional cost to the project of over $34 million dollars using CDR estimates, on top of tlhe approximately! $7.9 million that could be expected to be incurred for all sites taken together (Annex I Table A8). It was therefore necessary to develop an approach to the problem that could be accepted by the Govemment, and still comply with Bank safeguard policies. 21. The RAP approach. This Resettlement Action Plan therefore adopts the following approach. (a) focus the problem by identifying every case where owners would stand to lose substantially by the expropriation of land, and separating out cases where effects would be truly insignificant, or positive. (b) identify how those whose assets would lose value as a direct result of expropriation for this project, would be equitably compensated, and (c) present a sequence of actions for each site whereby the Bank will assure that adequate compensation has been made, and clear each site for disbursement and procurement to begin 2'. Focusing the Problem. (i) The Resettlelment Action Plan needs only to consider private property, and thus would exclude govemment or riunicipal land or land already in the public domain (Table A7 annexed); (ii) Two further categories within the Resettlement Action Plan are expected to provide substantial compensation packages that would effectively cover the expropriation of land. Of the remaining 145 lots which would be affected only by a reduction in surface area, the impacts on the majority (102) would be very small indeed. These could be covered by an hypothesis of a modest added value to the remainder, with the proviso that for each intersection where this hypothesis is applied, it would be tested through land assessment and projection of the project's benefits on land values. If, in any of these cases, significant prejudice should occur, the Commissions would be able to award appropriate compensation. There would be no significant adverse effects on residence or occupation, and probably net benefits. 23. This leaves a residue of about 43 lots 4Table A7), where there appears to be a risk of significant loss of assets, and where the Lebanese Government will provide to the Bank clear assurance of an effective mechanism for compensation and of the specific outcomes in each case. The areas of these individual lots, site by site, are shown adjacent to the Table A8 annexed. The combined area of these 43 plots is about 10.313 m2, or 32 percent of the total expropriated area. By applying realistic current market values for land only, an acceptable additional cost may be derived to enable compensation to the owner of all lost value causei by the expropriation of land only (compensation for all otier losses being alreadv provided for.) 24. Identifying the compensation mechanism. Expropriation Conmmissions will be able, in these 43 cases, to identify with the oxnvers an adequate figure for compensation. Commissions are empowered to assess and aw ard compensation against the owner's or right-liolder's demonstration of any lost value that has recognition in law Given the right signals, and the assurance that the Expropriating Authority can meet the costs, the Commissions are empowered to do the right thing bv those wlho stand to lose The Appeals process provides an effective check against significant over- or uLlder-estimation. ---DRJT URBAN TRANSPORT PROJECT -esetiernent Plan CDR July 14 20DX n The Expropriationi Commissionls will be greatly assisted to this outcomiie because they will be 1,en a clear assurance from high authority (a) that in BUTP theV would not be working within the h\pothesis of an expected 25 percent increase in value automatically generated by thle project, and that where the BUTP alignment decrees (or associated implementation of earlier decrees) result in taking of any asset withlout automatic provision for entitlement, the Expropriatioii Committees, shall estimate the impact of the expropnration on the owner and provide equitable compensation for lost asset value; (b) that they would be able to access any additional resources or expertise in land evaluation should they require it in order to complete their work effectively and expeditiously; and (c) that the necessary funds shall have been set aside to implement their decisions. 26. Monitoring the outcomes. For each intersection, the Expropriating Agency will prepare a report that will document in the format presented later in this RAP the expropnration and compensation awarded in respect of each lot. The instrument for monitoring and reporting the outcomes, to be submitted to the Bank by CDR's expropriation unit, would provide for each site, a lot-by-lot summary of the expropriations and the decisions of the Expropnration Commissions on compensation. Since the Commissions work with judicial independence, the Bank will use this instrument to determine and commnunicate that it is satisfied with the outcomes of the expropriation process, and communicate its approval for procurement and disbursement. 27. Special provisions would also be implemented to monitor the outcomes in the case of illegal occupants who would be required to move to make way for the project- At present, when CDR wishes to take possession of a site with illegal occupants, it notifies the Ministry of Displaced Persons of the project, and of the names, numbers and locations of any squatters or other illegally settled persons who require assistance to vacate the affected properties. The few squatter businesses operating on public land are subject to an ongoing municipal program that is relocating such businesses. They would be required to move sooner or later, irrespective of the project. Any that remain at the time of expropriation, who would have to move in order to make way for the project, would be compensated by the municipalities in order to assist their move. The same site monitoring instrument includes a section to report on action taken and compensation applied in such cases, which the Bank may approve prior to disbursement on a site. 28. The detailed RAP that follows is based on the technical work for preparation of the expropriation decrees, supplemented by a social assessment of the impacts, and a detailed description of the institutional measures and processes whereby the impacts on all persons affected by the project, w ill be addressed. -: (I:2h TRAN O PR:3J1_C-7 Pla 12~DR, 14 200C SEICTION It: DETAILED RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN A. INTRODl CTI0N A.lI Summary and Objectives of Resettlemenit Action Plan 2DC This Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) id-ntifies all the impacts on the residence, economiic activities and assets caused by expropriation of property in the Beirut Urban Transport Project (BUTP) by the exercise of Lebanon's power of eminent domain, namely the state's expropriation of land in the public interest, in this case for roads and highways. The RAP identifies the people affected by the project, describes the nature and scale of the impacts, identifies the mitigatory measures to be takeni and specifies the legal an] institutional framework and responsibilities that, together, will ensure that all losses incurred by the taking of land are fully compensated. 30. The plan is based on a complete inventor,, of the proposed sites affected by land acquisition, togethier with a socioeconomic survey of affected residents and businesses, and a review of the laws, procedures and institutions responsible for implementing resettlement. Appendix B includes plans for all the junctions and lists showing a breakdown and status of all lots affected by the land acquisition and photographic illustrations of all buildings affected by the land acquisition. 3 1. A nominative census of the households and persons who would be involuntarily displaced under the proposed project was undertaken. Information as precise as possible within prevailing circumstances was obtained by questionnaire, observation and interviews both of persons concerned and others in the neighborhood, providing information for a socio-economic profile: what kind of people they are, how long they have lived there, their status (owner-occupiers, tenants or illegal occupants), distances and modes of transport to and from work and places of education; and their expectations, attitudes and fears regarding resettlement. Information was also obtained on small business enterprises that would be directly affected: the nature of economic activity, how far away the owners lived, and their places of employment. A nominative list of registered owners of every affected plot and building was also compiled. No socio-economic survey was made in respect of registered land owners who would be unaffected other than by the value of their asset through the expropriation of land only. 32. The RAP also describes step-by-step the procedures by which persons to be displaced are to be identified, informed and compensated. This description includes a clear statement of the legal basis, the instruments and procedures to be applied, the basis on which eligibility is determined, the wvay compensation will be calculated for owners and tenants, how and when it will be paid, and the mechanisms and procedures for appeal, and mechanisms for monitoring to ensure that no undue hardships have been incurred. A timetable for each step accompanies this description. 33 In addition to describing provisions for those to be compensated through normal expropriation procedures, the RAP also identifies the measures to be taken through the Displaced Persons Fund that would assist the illegal occupants and small business operators who would have to move as a direct result of this project. l~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ANTEA R'r ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~JLEL-DIB BAJN SLNw)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ PRPOE GRADEd SEAATO OCO MA NER EL AOTr AJ T ALERIE E- E(ADLIE CORDO 2:SLULEASKMKLE RAOUCHA,X) HAEI k \ [ 1 X~~~~~~~~~~~~ORIO 4 vCHTLAT'UNEH-AiISLH-ADUE SULTAN IBRtHl t OUZAII _AYOUNN TH R N Ates / D ROaD CORRIDO /ARO IRAOAD-BCHARN LOC UR -L CORRIDOR 20: CHIYAH BOULEVARD EMUCHAR R A RIEH IJ I LERANESE BECHARA MEKHAEL AJRPORT U=NNER * GALERIE SEUMAN CORRIDOR 22: SALOUME-HArEK-MKAN C ES I I / . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~HAYEK .MKALLES ROUNDABOUT CORRIDOR 1. CHATILA-TAYOUNNEH-SAMI SOLH-ACUEH iI * .TAYOUNNEH ROUNDABOUT FItURE A CORRSAMI SOLH AVO / DARASCUS ROAD MAP OFCHOTERSECTIONSARAMOIJN - BCI DUN BIFURCATIOUEIFAT 7 ,o ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~CORRIDOR 6: AIRPORT ROAD-3ECHARA KHOURY BLVD aSS / * ~~~~~~~~~~~~~AIRPORT ROAD / CHtYAH BOULEVARD C° . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~BECHARA KHouRY OWMA BEYHUM T CAON * ECHARA KHDuRrY I NDEPENDENCE //HALDEH CORRIDOR 19: NORTHERN ENTRANCE $ / . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ANTELIAS Q; / . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~JAL EL DIB v / ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. DORA BRIDGE / ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~CORRIDOR 1: CORNICHE EL-MAZRAA / / O l~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ 2 3Km MUJSEUM eJa / = ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ADUEH FIGURE A CORRIDOR 1 B. OLD SAJDA ROAD MAP OF INTERSECTIONS . ARAMOUN - BCHAMOUN BIFURCATIONS _ _i .J- URBAN TRPAr,r'FT PR)JEC_ 2--sentiermen Piar, CDR Jui, 1" 220- A.2 Thc Extent of Land Acquisition and Efforts to Mlinimiize It 34' The only physical component of die Bl 'P which entails land acquisition is the constructioni of the 12 grade separations in the Corridor lmpro;enirent Program The constnictioni of overpasses and unlderpasses requires the widening, and realignment of the existing right of way land that will allow to allow enough right-of-wav for the at-grade ramps parallel to the grade-separation. . The expropriation of land and property, based on preliminary design, are expected at 12 of the 16 intersections wlhere grade separations will be constructed. These would require the expropriation of all or part of 9 structures, and of a total of 31,369 mn surface area from about 205 lots, of whiclh 4,158 m is already under servitude from decrees issued prior to this project. This Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) has been prepared by the Expropriating Authority, the Council for Development and Reconstruction (CDR) based on a report piepared by Team Intemational and reviewed by the World Bank. These expropriations are almost exclusively small excisions of strips and edges of property, and in the great majority of cases do not affect the use of the property. 36. This expropriation would affect 17 residential owner and tenant families (81 persons), 25 illegal occupants (100 persons); 6 enterprise owners, 18 entrepreneurs renting premises, and 6 squatter businesses. Because of the highly fragmented nature of property ownership, 1437 land owners would be affected. The actual nature of the impacts, and the application of compensation, is analyzed further in this section, and in more detail in the main body of the report that follows. 37. Appendix A Schedules 1-12 provides the entire list of expropriations by site, for each affected individual lot. 38. Appendix B, Figures No. Ia through 12a show the locations of the lots affected by each of the 12 relevant grade-separations, along with the required expropriation areas. Lists No. I through 12 and la through 12a summarize the status of the properties affected by expropriations at each of the proposed grade separation sites. Photographic illustrations (Figures lb through 12b) are also included. 39. In addition, the project is triggering the actual take-over of 4,158 m2 of land at three sites that is already under servitude, because earlier expropriation decrees had been issued, but not executed. TIhis land is also included in the RAP. 40. Every effort has been made to minimize the total area and impact of expropriation for this project. One of the two main cnrteria for site selection was to minimize the requirements for right of way and to avoid displacing businesses and residence (the other was technical feasibility and performance). The object is both to minimize the human impact, and to control the costs of a project where unimproved urban land may command between $300 and $2,000 or more per square meter. 41. In all the proposed junction improvements, the geometric design of the grade separations and associated roadways was done in a manner to reduce as much as possible the need for expropriation. Buildings were avoided, except where no altemative was available. For example through careful alignment and design, the project was able to greatly reduce the additional nrght of way requirements that had proposed under an earlier project for the Dora intersection. At the Airport intersection the design elevated only traffic on one direction; the N-S separations were eliminated on Camille Chamoun Blvd at Galerie Semaan, and on the COld Saida Road at Mar Mekhael. All these design changes greatly reduced the land acquisition necess.ary for the project. A.3. The Impacts of Land Acquisition 42. These expropriations would result in four main types of impacts, summarized below and presented in an entitlement matnrx in Tables 4 - tl below, discussed in much greater detail later. All imlpacts would apply to individual houselholds and families, and to some companies and organizations. but not to comnlnlllities or larger groups, and there are no impacts relating to common property or traditional usufriuct. (a) Residential relocation: Seven occupied buildings and two with unoccupied or abandoned residences at six sites (Beit al Atfal, Airport, Musharrafieh, Mar Mekhael, _EIPJ URSAN TRANSPORT PROJEC- -esetiemen' Plan CDRJv 14 23X Havekl and Becliamoun-Aralmloun) would be expropriated These comprise 26 occupled apartmenlts and S vacant ones A total of 42 families ( I 8 l persons) wvould have to move as a result of expropriation, and in addition the oxWIners would lose assets in land and structures; These impacts are sumumiarized in Table I below, enumiierated in greater detail in the annlexed table Al. and described in more detail in the socio-economic survey discussed below Table 1: Loss of Residential Accommodation Status Families Persons Apartments Owner-occupier 6 28 5 Rent tenant 11 53 10 _ ___ Squatter 25 100 11 Vacant/abandoned 0 0 8 Total 42 181 34 (b) Business relocation: Nlost buildings affected contain small business premises. Forty small business premises on 15 plots are expropriated, of whtich 6 are run by owners and their partners/shareholders, 18 are rented, 6 are run by squatters and the remaining 10 are vacant. These impacts are summarized in Table 2 below, enumerated in detail in the annexed tables A3 and described in more detail in the socio-economic survey report. (c) NMinor impacts on business and other premises: The loss of strips adjacent to the main road will affect 18 businesses in a variety of minor ways, none of which would require the business to cease operating or to relocate to another property. Examples of these minor impacts would be relocation of signs and enclosures; reconfiguration of gas stations; and movement of temporary structures to another part of the same plot. The most significant of these impacts are listed in detail in the annexed table A6. Wlhere the only impact would be on existing fences (concrete blocks and/or steel wire) constructed either around empty lots between two adjacent lots, these were not listed. Any required relocation of the fences will be done during construction of the grade separation at no cost to the owners. Such impacts are discussed further in the section on compensation procedures. Table 2: Loss of Business Premises Status Business entrepreneurs Premises Owner-occupier 6 6 Rent tenant 18 18 Squatter __ 6 6 Vacant/abandoned 0 10 Total 30 40 (d) Reduction in plot area: The majority of plots are affected by the expropriation of land. Of these, 145 plots affected only by the taking of land, in amounts that vary from as little as 1m2 to almost 1600 m2. In addition, the project would trigger the actual takeover of 4,158 m2 of land for wvhich an earlier expropriation decree had been issued, but not executed. These expropriations are summarized in the annexed table A7 and listed in detail in Schedules 1-12 and in Appendix B. The compensation awarded by Expropriation Commissions at similar sites has varied from US$ 750 to US$ 2,000 per ni2, although the actual market value of the land could be considerablv less. It is emphasized that such a wide range of factors may be taken into account in determining the probable market value of the land of any particular plot, that no general rules can be Ior the purposes of this plan and socioeconomic su.reN, a famri]h as defined as a nuclear family (married couple \\aN lor iitliout childrei. and econoinicalh indepeiindeut Thus a household could compinse two amnilies. pareiis anid niarin :d soIn "ith CliilLdrcin -e-eltte,.ren' P2.a D; JJI, t4 'X 1, established. The Impact of land ta ., ei0 thc owners would varv considerably accordin to a number of factors, of which the most imiportant include the folloxxing. The amount of land taken. its ratio to the overall plot size and the size of the remainder Whether the plot is built or not. rhe area that may be built is a proportion of the plot size, defined for each area in the urban master plan; the value of a vacant plot or a plot with a condemned building is affected by the size and shape of the area for which a building permit may be issued, and hence a reduction in area would cause a reduction in the maximum floor si.e of the building permitted, - The number of registered owners. particularly where a building has vertical subdivisions. In a vertically subiivided plot, usually for apartments, the land title specifies one or more common arseas and individual subdivisions together with their registered owners. Land taken f)r the realignment of an existing road would affect the common area, usually the setback, and the loss or compensation is distributed equally by subdivision and hence vwould be greatly diluted. Whether the impact of the project for which land is taken would cause a change in the value of the remainder. Reduction in travel times between different points in the city would be expected to increase the value of properties at heavily congested intersections because of their strategic location. B. OBJECTIVES OF THE RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 43. The objectives of the Resettlement Action Plan are to ensure that all people who would suffer loss through the exercise of eminent domain are fully compensated, and in particular that they suffer no diminution of livelihoods or assets. This means that: (a) All owner-occupiers and tenants of residences should be able, through full and prior cash entitlements, to reestablish residence in another location of their choice and in an equivalent owned or rented propen-y; and absentee owners will be able to acquire equivalent residential property. (b) All owner-occupier entrepreneurs and tenant entrepreneurs should be able, through full and prior cash compensation, to reestablish their enterprise elsewhere in an equivalent owvned or rented property of their choice, and to cover all associated costs including lost time. and absentee owners wAill be able to acquire equivalent premises. (c) All minor business impacts (e.g. fences, impacts on gas station structures) would be compensated in cash or fully remedied by the project according to the entrepreneur's choice. (d) All net losses of asset value through expropriation of land only would be fully compensated. WVhere there is a sound basis to expect that the expropriation of small portions of land only will not result in a net loss of asset value, and entails no prejudice to residence or economic activity, this will be demonstrated. (e) Illegal residential occupants will be able to relocate at a place of their own choice and to maintain or improve their living conditions through financial assistance from the Displaced Persons Fund or other means that will be determined on a case by case basis. Businesses illegally established on the public domain or on municipal land are presently being relocated by the municipalities wkithout compensation as part of a more general on-going municipal improvement program not specifically linked to the project sites. Nlunicipalities will. however, pay compensation where it is required in order to induce busuiess operators that are still in occupation at the time of the implementation of the expropriation decrees, to locate elsewhere _IRPJT URBAN TRANSPORT PROJECT 'esettlement Plan CDP JuIv 14 200C l; ( . SOCIG-ECONOMIC AND OTIIER STDI)IES C. I Census of affected population 44. The affected population was provisionallI enumerated using three different methods according to the type of impact. This was not an official census, which would be done after the approval of the expropnation decree. 45. Residents (landowners, renters and illegal occupants). Based on the cadastral plan, a list of all properties that would be affected by expropriation of land was prepared, a socioeconomic survey was designed and undertaken by a leading Lebanese sociologist. A questionnaire was administered to every household by an experienced sociologist who also undertook open-ended interviews with affected families and neighbors. The topics covered their residential status (owner- occupier, rent tenant and duration of tenancy, or illegal occupant; employment, transport to work or school, integration into the neighborhood, and fears and expectations in relation to expropnation). The number of families enumerated was 42, comprising 181 persons. 46. Small business enterprises (owners, renters, illegal occupants and informal activities). The same survey detailed the types of enterprises undertaken in commercial premises that would be affected, together with a list of all informal or illegal uses of space that would be affected including temporary structures. The survey covered the types of businesses, whether the premises were owned, rented or illegally occupied, the number of employees, the distance to the owners' residence, and the ease with which the business could be relocated. Subsequently a distinction was made between those businesses that would be required to relocate off site, and those that would suffer only minor impacts and would continue on site. The number of businesses surveyed was 32, although only 30 are now scheduled for expropriation. 47. Land owners where only plot size would be affected. Where no impact on residence or commerce would occur, other than by reduction of the surface area of the containing plot, only the registered owners were determined, through official copies of all land registry certificates extracted from the land registry. These documents detail the history of the plot, its changes of ownership and subdivisions, and the full names of registered owners with the proportion of their shares.4 This procedure enabled lots owned by government or municipalities, and lots already in the public domain, to be identified, and for the remainder to determine whether the owners were individual, organization, company or bank (possibly through mortgage). Because of the dispersion of ownership, and the limits of this type of impact, it was considered both impractical and inappropriate to attempt any survey in advance of the census that would be undertaken by the expropriation commnissions. Owners include 1437 registered individuals, 28 companies, 3 banks, and two plots owned by a foreign govemment. 48. Census by Expropriation Commission. As required by law, the full and authoritative census of the population would be undertaken by the Expropriation Commissions at the time the Expropriation Decree is issued. The Commission serves a judicial summons on the legal owners of the specified plots to appear before it and to inform the commission of all co-owners, tenants and all others having legal rights in the plot. The Commission visits the concemed plots and verifies this information. On rare occasions the appeals process is used to add or delete a name from the census. For illegal residents or operators of businesses the Ministry of Displaced Persons, and not the Expropriation Comnmission, is responsible for the final nominative lists of those affected, which would be undertaken after request by the Expropriating Agencv. In L.eNuion sunrexed plots are divided rntn- sliares of 2.400. ssrdi sh3res recorded to three decimal places (thus. 1 2.400.000) \\lierQ plots lzis%c been lege1f subdivided e for flaLs). th1is mn3 result n the smallest registered share being one ten milliontl oIthieplot's oserall xalue. nifh a thcorancal rian ot'approximatel% I lOt10).OOU00 foraplotAith oer 4U subdivisions The x *wtifcies ot.te rec plots sir re not located at thetime of this surseso. and th. owners siere therefore unknownn ---2U- URAt2 I TRAJSPO0T PROJE-C -settlement Plan CDP ju y 14 200S ( .2 Socio-Ecoiioniic Survey 4u ONxner-Occupiers. There are six o0vner-occupler famillies comprising a total of 'S persons (4.7 persons per familv) at two sites. Beit al-Athii and Blhamoun-Aramoun (See Appendix A. Table Al and photographic illustrations lb and l2b). Two of these faiiiles constitute an extended family sharing an apartment. Tflese families are relatively well off, and some own other apartments or shops in the same building whichi they rent to odters. They are also well established: the owners in Beit al- Atfal, for example, have been there since the 1950s. The owner occupiers do not fear the economic consequences of resettlement because they know from other cases that their compensation will be adequate to allow them to move to apartments at least as good as the one they now occupy, possibly in a quieter location that would relieve them of the traffic noise from which they now suffer. They expect the compensation money to be sufficient to enable them to buy other apartments that they will rent. Nevertheless, the owner occupiers are far ltss likely than others to be willing to relocate, having established roots in the neighborhood (four of six'< do not want to move). The wish to remain within the neighborhood is a common pattem. 50. Rent Tenants. Until 1992 rent tenants enjoyed a high degree of security and controlled rents, whereby a tenant had the automatic right to renewal of a lease. This ceased in 1992, after passing law 159/92, after which a landlord could give a tenant a month's notice to quit at the end of a three-year tenancy. Of the 11 tenant residents families (53 people, 10 apartments) in three buildings at three sites, nine have "old" (therefore secure and well compensated) tenancies. (See Appendix A, Table Al, and photographic illustrations lb, 4a). Most are in comfortably modest circumstances. Employment varies from commerce, salaried employment or professional to a few cases of itinerant vendors. Children attend school or university, mor e than half more than 3 km away. 51. Illegal Residents (squatters). The 100 illegal residents (25 families) may be considered vulnerable. They live in dilapidated, condemned or war damaged buildings in poor or precarious condition. While they cannot be evicted except by official govemor order, they are not entitled to any legally determined quantity of assistance. An o%vner wishing to repossess a building from squatters pays them to leave; if the building is expropriated the owner may wait for the Displaced Persons Fund (DPF) to pay them. One common reason for squatting therefore is the hope of obtaining resettlement assistance, and the investigator was welcomed by some of them in the expectation that she had come to provide them assistance. They generally live in difficult socioeconomic circumstances, do not own cars (except for two families operating a taxi service) and take the bus or walk to work and school. (See Appendix A, Table A2, and photographic illustrations 4b and 5b). 52. The socio-economic status of the squatters is in general difficult. Their limited income comes from marginal jobs such as itinerant trading, working at the port, or driving taxis. Only four of the 30 who work are professional, business owner, artisan or employee. Sons and fathers work together to make ends meet. Yet there are 27 children in schools and universities. 53. The difference in socio-economic status between legal and illegal residents is vividly illustrated by mobility data (Appendix A, Table 2). Residents and owners have 12 cars for 17 families, of which two are extended families sharing an apartment: thus all but three households have a car (80 percent). Illegal residents have only 5 cars for 25 families (12 percent) and of these two use them for a taxi service, one family alternating father and son to keep the vehicle working the greatest number of hours possible. This lack of mobility affects their mode of transport to work-squatters have further to go, but travel by bus (57% percent) whereas only two residents or owners take the bus. Residents and owners can put their children in schools further away from home (they have more choice). Children of squatters are more likely to walk 54 A Visit by our social researcher working on this RAP to the residences of the squatter families has shown poor living standards. Damaged windows were replaced with nailed down wood boards. Basic utilities are illegally brought to the residencies They tapped into the public electric lines (no metering), telephone service is not available since they can not produce a legal rent contract, and xkaret supply is either bought from tankers or wi±h illegal tapping into the water main. Some of the apartments are shared by more than one nuclear frmily. These flats are divisioned with partitions. The partitions are in some cases fixed and in others just curtains to separate living quarters, however they R_ RUT URBArk TRANSPORT PROJEO- -esettiement Pla CDR Jul, 14 900C I diare a coliillomo kitchen and batlhroom Thne crosdlmg of more than one familN In one flat IS InI anticipation of being compensated per nuclear familk rather than per apartm1enit The DPF regulations md;cates compensationi is per flat rather thaln per family, however with cases of more than one famrily per flat the DPF deals with such cases individually an d dependiing on the conditions and circumstances compensationi is decided and paid out 55. In Mar Mkhael, lot No. 58, the access to the upper apartments is under a damaged collapsed roof slab. The squatter families worry about possible injuries from a sudden collapse of the roof, however they are not willing to relocate for fear of losing their compensation from the DPF. 56. Small Enterprises. Nine of the 12 sites contain active small businesses that will be severely affected by expropriation i.e. they would have to move. Mlost of these are concentrated at one single site, Airport junction, where 10 of the 30 affected businesses are located, together with 11 of the 40 premises affected, 16 of the 47 working entrepreneurs or family members and 14 of the 30 workers (see Table A3: Status of Businesses Requiring Resettlement, and illustrations referenced therein). Eleven of these work with the owner-operator of a very popular restaurant. Two businesses, one at Hayek and the second at Bchamoun/Aramoun, are run by partners who jointlv inherited the property. Mlost of the others are run by their owners and their family members with, at most, one or two employees. 57. Because of the heavy vehicular and pedestrian traffic, these intersection locations are well suited to the kinds of small business enterprises that have sprung up. Many are car related (mechanical and electrical parts and repair, servicing, tire repair, service stations), while others serve the local resident community (comer groceries, food and beverage), and clothing shops. In addition to these dominant activities, several others were identified that also serve passers-by: key cutting service, paint shop, a transport company office. 58. Most of the businesses appeared to be doing reasonably well, and most business owners expressed satisfaction with their state. However, others were not doing so well, although the reasons seemed to be diverse, and specific-poor choice of business for the location, poor business or management skills of the operator. 59. The majority of business operators live close to their businesses (often in the same or an adjacent building) and walk to work. There is a strong correlation between living more than 3 km away and coming to work by car: nobody uses the bus and only three take a taxi. The affected businessmen have a strong sense of location and would want to locate close to their present location. 60. Of the 18 small enterprises renting their premises, 13 are under the old tenancy law and 5 are unlder the new (Table A5). 61. Six of the 30 businesses are run by squatters, one at Mar Mekhael and the remainder at Miusharrafieli. These comprise two tire shops, a garage, a restaurant, a snack-shop and a cigarette seller (Table A3 and Photos 4b, 5b). One squatter businessman owns a car. These small squatter businesses are generally of a much lower order than the owned and rented businesses, as may be seen from the photographs. 62. Like residents, therefore, most of these small enterprises would prefer to relocate nearby. 6 3. Mlinor effects on enterprises. Eighteen enterprises, mostly micro enterprises except for including six gas stations, will be directly affected in minor ways bv the expropriation of land. None of these impacts would cause more than minor inconvenience, loss of surface area, or temporary loss of business, all of which are subject to compensation. A squatter operating a mechanic's business from a temporary shack on municipal land could move back further into the lot or might relocate witl assistanice as discussed below t4- Loss of land onlv. The impacts of loss of land only' varv considerably with the amount takeni, and the characteristics and uses of the lot, and the characteristics of the remaining portion. In all cases the land taken is adjacent to the existing public domain With so many factors to take into account, it is impossible to predict with certainty what the impacts would be, and it is only when the .z:Pj _ U LBAN TRANS DORT PROJEC- ~^sen)emen' Pian CDR Ju y 14, 210CCi (ominalsslonis take up the dossier, interview the own-ers and make their own assessmenits. tlat the mlultiple factors affecting impact can be determired for each particular case Howvevr, somne more oeneral classes of likely impacts are evident, a) \Iirere the land is not built, the proportion of land takefn will negatively affect die value of the remainder not onli by reduction in area, but by reduction ini its development potential resulting from the area of the lot that may be built tipoin. b) \'here the land is built, and particularly with vertical subdivisions, the effect of the taking of land will be greatly diluted by the number of owners. c) There are some cases where the land in question is part of the common area of a subdivided apartment block, but is used primarily by one party (e.g. a commnercial establishment) as a free good. In this case the real impact is only of a loss of a communally owned free good. d) Where the surface area of a plot is reduced, but the value to the owner increases as a result of the project and therefore no net loss is incurred, this will be shown case by case or site by site. In the case of the BUTP, the Expropriation Conunissions will be urged not to apply the provision that, on the assumption of an automatic increase in property value, up to 25 percent of a plot's land area may be expropriated without fiurther compensation, but instead they are urged to assess each case separately. 65. A site survey indicated that the majority of expropriations concern the taking of small areas of land only from the comers and edges of plots lanid, and where there are no impacts on residence or business) other would be minimal or positive. Excluding lots that are not private property, lots where compensation would be given for business, owners and rightholders of some 145 plots would be affected. However, in the great majority of these cases (102) the effects would be truly insignificant: small strips of land from the front of high rise buildings with multiple vertical subdivisions would have no real impact on the value of the owners property, some areas are already effectively a public road. and some expropriations are insignificant in absolute area (e.g. less than 10 mi2. In some areas the plots are tiny relics of earlier expropriations, clearly dating to decades back, and have little intrinsic value. Many of these have multiple shareholding owners. 66. In 43 cases, however, the impacts appear to be significant. For example, in large vacant lots, the expropriation of an area would affect the size of a building for which a permit could be issued, since this is a function of the lot size and shape arid the zoning regulations applicable. In other cases, the absolute areas are quite large; and therefore the values could be quite large. C.3 Land Tenure and transfer 67. Survey. All land in Beirut was surveyed under the French Administration in the 1930s, and surveyed plots were numbered, including land placed within the public domain. The survey was done with a high degree of accuracy. Land registration is maintained by an administrative service under the Ministry of Finance, in which the history of every plot, with changes in rights, ownership, liens etc. is recorded. Official extracts from the land registry may be obtained for a fee. 68. The cadastral map is maintained by a technical service within the same directorate. The service is charged with updating the boundaries and numbers of plots. Corrections to the cadastral map and to the title may be made where it is clear from the title registry or from the actual road alignment that the land had been converted to public domain. In the case of this project a total of 13.200 mn had been earlier expropriated mostly in the 1950s to 1970s. 6P Title. The title deed extracted from the land registry gives the history of all transactions on the plot, all subdivisions, the names of owsTners and their shares. In Lebanon, land ownership is recorded in shares in order to allowx for a high degree of fine tuning of different proportions, multiple subdivisions of different proportions resulting through the process of inheritance. Every plot is divided into 2,400 shares, but each share may be recorded to three decimal places (thus, I / 2.400,000). Where plots have been further legally subdivided (e.g. for apartments), each subdivision is recorded as 2.400 shares This may result in the smallest registered share in practice (as in this project) being about one millionth of the original plot's overall value, but in theory the svstem can record a proportion as small as approximately I / 100,000,000 share of an original plot, where there are about 40 subdivisions. Thus, the exact value of any transaction for any individual owner may be calculated The operation of the land law is gender neutral. EEiPJT UREAN TRANSPDRT PROJEC- -'setltement Plan CDR July 14 200I 70 It is tlenerallv Ill the self-interest of ovners to ensure that chlaines of o%wnershlp are recorded In the registry, particularlk in case of expropriationi and compensation If an owZner fails to record a iLEŽht holder, and expropriation results in loss and compensation. the owner could find himflself liable to restitute the entire loss suffered by the right holder. 71. Except in cases areas still severely affected by uncontrolled movements and settlement during the civil war, there is little uncertainty about ownership, legal rights or boundaries. Intrusion into the property of another or into the public domain can be determined to the centimeter. 72. Subdivision. Where a plot is subdivided into smaller lots, new plot numbers are assigned to the subdivision, and 25 percent of the onrginal area is taken into the public domain as provision for roads and green space. WVhere a multi-story building is erected and individual portions are sold, the plot may be divided into subdivisions bearing the orginal number with a suffix (thus, 1132/1 . . . 1132/28). As indicated above, each subdivision has 2,400 shares with the number of shares recorded against the name of each individual owner. 73. Renting, sub-contracting. Prior to 1992, the rent law allowed to the tenant the right to automatic renewal of the contract and capped rent increases. Provided the rent contract did not prohibit sub-letting, a landowner renting out a property virtually lost control of it, because the tenants could pass on the right of tenancy to a third party, who in tum could pass it on to another third party, allowing to the landlord only a modest increase in rent at each new contract. 74. A new rent law in 1992 changed the balance greatly in favor of the landlord. For tenancies initiated after that date, the landlord the right of repossession on condition of giving one month's notice before the expiry of the contract (normally three years). The cap on rent increases was relaxed. 75. Tenants, either of business premises or of residences, whose contracts date before 1992 are thus have a great advantage over those whose contracts are 1992 or later. 76. Illegal Occupancy and Tenants at will. Squatters or occupants with the consent of owners but without a rent contract have no established legal rights, and are therefore not protected by law and are not legally entitled to compensation on eviction, since eviction infringes no legal rights. But since squatting proliferated during the events of 1975 - 1991, mainly due to wide-scale displacement of people from their villages, this became a central issue in the framework of national reconciliation. A special fund called the Displaced Peoples Fund (DPF) was established, to pay squatters to leave the illegally occupied buildings and return to their villages. Given that many squatters do not now wish to return to their villages of origin, but would prefer for reasons of economic opportunity to establish themselves in Beirut, the DPF provides financial support that allows squatters to relocate wherever they choose. Moreover, squatters or tenants at will may not be evicted without official govemor order. The departure of squatters and tenants at will is thus negotiated with the landlord or the DPF. C.4 Expropriation law and procedures 77. The Law. The Lebanese constitution guards and protects the right of private property including landed property and the nrghts attaching to it. The exercise of eminent domain, in Lebanon, for expropriating pnvate property in the public interest is governed by Law No. 58 dated 29/05/1991 This law is extensive and governs many cases. The state may only expropriate these rights when it is legally to be declared in the public interest, and against payment of a prior and equitable compensation (indemnutc eqmzrablc). All compensation is by monetary award through independent judicial assessment. Where there is an appeal, at least half the compensation is paid in advance, but the process of expropriation cannot be halted unless the validity of the public interest decree itself is challenged 78 Procedures. The procedure is described in the sections which follow, and illustrated dlagrammatically in Figure B. 70 In the case of the BUTP, expropriation for grade separations in 12 sites (projects) follows nonmal Lebanese practice Under the provision for expropriation of land in the public interest, The Council for Development and Reconstruction prepares a draft alignment decree for signature by the 2-_RJT URBAN TRANSPORT PROJEC- -seterneer.! Plan CDP Jjl, 14 200O Minister of Transport, the Prime Minister and tiu President Annlexed to the decree are the followxvin docurnents A sketchi of the entire proiect proposec A detailed plan of the land that will be expropriated A list showing the registration number of each property, its location, the names of all the owners and rightliolders in the Land Registry. The name of the apparent owner is included in the list, following the Opinisn of the mayor and specifying the propertv limits. - A detailed list of the content of the land whose expropriation is proposed, and detailed plans of buildings already constructed before the date of publication of the decree in the government gazette. 80. After publication of the decree, any interested party mav consult these documents at the government offices, and obtain copies of them. S I. An Expropriation Decree for road projects and road alignment has no expiry date. It remains in force until amended or annulled by another decree. 82. WVith the publication of a decree, the affected properties are under servitude. They may be bought and sold, and buildings may be maintained, but no improvements may be made until the expropriation process has been completed. Properties are not held to have been expropriated until the decision of the expropriation commission is handed down, which decision is communicated to the Lands registry and entered on the property titles and the cadastral map. 83. On the basis of a plan, an expropriation decree may cover any portion of land or a building. It is up to the owner to request that the full property (land or building) be expropriated, on the grounds that the unexpropriated remainder would have lost its value. This may be done, for example, when the expropriation of part of a building renders the remainder unusable; or when the expropriation of a lot leaves a remainder too small to qualify for a building permit, and the owner does not have an adjacent plot to which it can be joined. _!RU7 URBAII TRArUSPORT PROJEC- -eSett ement Plan CDR JLIY 14 2L Figure B: Expropriation. C ompensatioIn and .Appeals Procedutfre EXPROPRIATION PROCEDURES FLOW CHART P'repare an Lxpropnaltion plan Cadastral map Traiscrnpt of land registrv ofeacli aflected plot - repare detailed plan_ofbh.ildin . . . ~~~~~~~~~~~at1ccted b\ explropnation Limits ol proposed project a Aflectcd plots Expropration Decrce signed by- concerned Minister President of Council of Ministers President of the Republic Expropriation Decree Decree transmitted to an Expropriation published in the Oflicial Gazette Commitiee composed of a judee -an Field Inspection engineer - an assessor Committee checks the status Expropnationi Committee invites of tde lot. ow0ners to a first meetingD s v : During inspection the First Expropriation Meeting i presence of rcntcrs and Ossners are asked to report all who I occupants ha,e ri chts. O-ners are asked whetier- (leeal, illegal. arid squatters). they prefer full or partial expropriation is checked of their propemt o A renter must present his Second Expropriation Meeting contract and documents. Oners to present rent and other to support his claim contracts ssith supporting electricity if dte ossner failed to report him and ss\ater bills dated prior to expropriation decree -I The Committee meets to dccide the amount of irdemnitv broken down: land + buildings e trees The Expropnation Committee issues an "assessment report" v hich decides the amount to be paid to each owner or renter. Decision is notified to the Expropriating Administration and to owners and rcnters. All parties have the right to appeal within 30 days from their notification date. C'oncerned parties are infonmed that thes- catn Deposit Decision and deposit of parties are informed that the' c 4- indemnification monies in an escroa Appeals are presented to the cash indemnities due to them account I Expropriation Appeal _ Committee. Take-Oevr Decision signed by Director Owner must appoint a Laws er Take-O%er decision is notifLed to the Cadastral - General Head of Departnent of j and paos a lumpsum fee of Administration Expropriatinrz Administration LL35000. No time limit to reach an Appeal Decision Indemnities are paid 1000o payment for vacant land if Admin. has no appeal and take-over is executed 75°o if Admin. has no appeal but Appeal Decision take-over is not executed No Time Limit (ma% tak-e 6 - 8 months) -Iake-Oserisexecutedx sitlin I5das ofdate of If Admun appeals. 5000 is paid Notificatton for Vacant Land and ssithin ,(I da%s <- 2500 upon appeal decision t-or Land and ildini- 20upon take-over and removing trees Balance of lndemnirn (extra or less) 'N\ l,rst Dft,- -enw c-- eet-rc s%ill be paid according to Appeal ------- - pa--tn o.f indemnidies Decision eJ7 UR3BAr T?4'iSPORT PROjEC- Tha-, CDR JK 1-4 2DX. 1). INSTITL'TION.AL SETTING 1).1 The Expropriation Commissions and thte Appeals Commission S4. Compenisationi is determined by judicial process Whlen the Expropriating Authority wishes to ilmplemiienlt a decree, die dossier is sent to tie Expropriation Commission to adjudication of compensation. In the case of the BlTP, the 12 intersections fall variously under the authority of one of three Expropriation Commissions, Beirut, Mont-Liban Nord, and Mont-Liban Sud. 85. These commissions are set up by decree in accordance with proposals from the competent ministers for each Mouhafazat. They compnrse: A commission of the first instance composed of a chairperson (a judge or magistrate of at least the 10th degree)6 and two members, an engineer and a property valuator. One or more expropriation appeals commissions, considering likewise of a magistrate of at least the 6th degree as chairperson, an engineer and an expert in land law and valuation. - A chairperson and two other members are named as altemates in case of absence. _ Each commission has a court clerk and a swom messenger for summonses and notifications; the appeals commission has a clerk and messenger. 86. The expropriation commission is competent to undertake the following: Determine all entitlements or compensaitions resulting from expropriation; - Decide on requests by owners for total expropriation and full compensation (as noted in the preceding paragraph); * Determine the value of small portions of land which cannot be used for building, - Determine disputes regarding the division of compensation between shareholders; - Determine matters related to the integrity of a plot and the cumulative effect of successive excision of land from a property. 87. -The CDR is represented at the commissions by a legaly qualified representative. Individual landowners may represent themselves, or by a lawyer. Where individual citizens appear not to be. aware of their rights, the presiding judge should not take sides, but may open the way for the owner to realize the possibilities. Judges attempt to ensure that citizens are not deprived of their rights, and tend to lean more toward the citizen than to the Administration in such matters. Expropriation Commissions have wide discretion, and any right that can be shown to be damaged is subject to compensation. D.2 CDR as Expropriating Agency ss The CDR Expropnration Unit comprises 15 staff members headed by a director who reports directly to the president of CDR. The unit staff niembers' work closely with the projects department engineers and the Legal Department from the initiation of the decree process up to payment of settlements. S. The duties of the Expropriation Unit are to insure that all tasks related to expropnation are done according to the laws of expropnation and to verify the details of expropriation files. During a project development phase, and as the need for expropriation arises, the expropriation unit along witlh the engineers from the Projects Department start vorking on the expropriation decrees along with the consuiltants that has been commissioned to prepanr the expropriation plans and files. Upon approval of die final expropriation decrees, the unit sends thie decrees to the board of CDR for official approval b% the agency. The decrees are then sent to the Council of Ministers for approvals and issuance. ludjes and mnalstrates in L-banon range from I the hiphest) to 15 (the lo"west in the land). nEERUT URBAN TRANSPORT PROJECT rF-eset!cement Pian CDR July 1 00 Nleanvhile. tie expropriatioln files are being verified for completeness by the uniit. Uponi issuanice of the decree, thc expropriation unit forwards the decrees along with thle expropriationi files to thie ExPropriation Commission. Q0. The unit also provides advice and infomiation to the owsners of properties affected by the decree so thlat they may present themselves before the commission and provide proofs of their legal rights (owner, tenant, etc.). D.3 Displaced Peoples Fund and Mlunicipalities 91. Residential squatters receive their compensation from the Displaced People Fund (DPF). This Fund was established to work with the Ministry of Displaced People on the repatnration of families that were displaced during the civil disorder period (1975 - 1990). Some of the properties affected by the expropriation are extremely damaged building (structurally condemned) that are occupied by squatters. Squatters do not receive compensation under the provision of the Expropriation Law, but will receive support compensation for the Displaced People Fund. Practice shows that compensations paid by the fund have been generous, and mostly exceed compensation of a tenant renting an expropriated building. They are usually sufficient for 12-18 months' rent. 92. A visit by the social researcher to the DPF to obtain a typical case history of a squatter family who was compensated and resettled has shown that the DPF maintains accurate records of all the lots and buildings occupied by squatters, in addition to a register of squatter families eligible for compensation. These records are based on actual field surveys performed by the DPF in the early 1990 's. DPF compensates squatter families for their loss of residences and to help them relocate. Once a squatter family is compensated and resettled, no records are kept of their whereabouts, and thereafter their resettlement status is not monitored. 93. DPF staff agrees that the squatter families are waiting for their compensation. Far from DPF encountering problems or reluctance during the compensation and resettlement processes, they receive frequent queries from squatter families about the compensation schedule and whether their cases could be expedited. 94. DPF does not compensate squatted businesses, taking the view that there is nothing to be compensated since the squatted business has enjoyed the use of rent-free premises. Such businesses will in any case be unable to continue much longer in occupation of public or municipal land, since the municipalities concemed have an ongoing program of removing illegal businesses and structures from the public domain in the course of improving the urban environment and open spaces. The municipalities inform those affected that a structure or business operation on public or municipal land is illegal and must be removed. The person affected is given a certain period of time in which to comply with the order. Such orders are generally complied with in the spirit of citizenship and compliance with the law. In the case of Mucharaffieh and Mar Mekhael sites, the Ghobeiri and Chiah municipalities have already begun a program of embellishment of the public domain which is prior to and unconnected with BUTP. This independent municipal program will result in the removal without compensation of the 5 businesses established there. However, if at the time of implementation of the BUTP expropriation these businesses are still located in the public domain, the municipalities will pay them compensation to enable them to move in order not to impede the timely execution of the project. L_RBAr' TPA"SDPRT PR2JZC- -se-:emen' Pla'n CDR Ju;, 1 - - I. ELIGIBILITY TO A.NI) VALVATION OF COMPENSATION 1,.- Eligibility 9Q5 Eligibility for compensation is preset,ted in the following four tables. according to type of loss and, within that, by status of the person affected (owner, renter, squatter etc) These tables cover entitlements for residence expropriation of business, expropriation which would have minor impacts on business, and expropriation of land only. IEIHU I U _- - 7- 7 C;7~ . C ~~~~~~~~~People () _^ _ _ , , . , tz < Families C; c _ eJ ' ' * c : s. People (#) ^-: Families m _ People (4) _ - - X t- '- -)Z _ -' ) Czc , Il' - - Familie fF, ~ S f-L C; JI I-J~~~~~~~~~~~- T able A2: NIlbilitv of ltesitlcnts AlTectcd( I)y lResetteieicilt A. L.c"aIl ICsi(l ecits I) italEltcc hlornl I'IC tcrICd(I 4 ])iStallCC' olOl Etl 14 Res idcrcc to Nlodci 0 I nl l)sp(rt to Distance R si dencet 10111i I lI Sc | I i ) ._ C orren l2'llt Work ResidelnCce Scliools (kiii) _~ ( ir.lde Scpar%ut'1 ) . l ~_ W \\ork place (kiLl) Relocation (kiii) (i Idlllp.rioll 't1 1n 1) iXillaolt 9 () 7 1 1 T~ ~ ~ ~~~- -\ 24slil I 0i ca ' 9 9II 12L v I 02 l *41 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . cIIS1IILI-I 3(9SD5 I - 5- lot;ll ~~~~1 25 1(), 17' 1 6 23 :1 2 17 S 64 3 10 321 I 21 6 I5 2~ ~ ~~3 30 7 7 0 7 7 6 % 4)/ 1 1(X GX 1 to3° I31 1" 1" coo~~~~~~~~~~C Al -'llp l\lotes (lIt) I I% 0 U' P C. All gyrotips Trotals 42 181 60 1 2 1 5 32 1 7 6 19 16 24 5 13 58 7 30 2 1 20 1 3 9 '1161 0.2 0.25 0.53 0.28 0.1 0.32 0.27 0.57 0.1 2 0.31 0.1 2 0.52 0.36 0.34 0.~2-2 0 16 0.281 Notes: (I) T\\olheadlsof faminlies work abroad (2)) FourI ownerCIS uwII\V r1nzg to i-elocatc (3) Iwo an' Ies 'IiCS iIVllil to i'CIOCatC. Tablde A3: StaItuS of'ActiiC li3siiiesses lteRitiirii( Resettlemicntit I.t,rupepl,lietucus' Property 'Fletlle lstlsiriess c'l-ilnlises W onrkiiig on I'reiiiie G ( r r:dclt Sepaiatio No. x hio No. \\ho lotal No of lottalI N o. o Nf . o l Ju nIction 1 n Ret Squalter Act\iv P'ikCS lBulsilCNss A ( > ners l~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~IIQllc A§wi l'I'- Xl.l c (I ( 1)% r Z. PI-~~~~l~Cmn ises P l~ie iscs lilnsiiicsses I-el)reiiiCSe 1(ci il-A.hl 1: 1 I s l (l -) SI 2 llcclai a kilNIoinr\ 5 5 . Airport 8 10 I II 16 6 I 4 N Inshanafl-l-sihell 5 5 5 2 6 ' 5 Mar 1Nlclki;acl 2 3 2 5 3 ( 7 1 a\ilhlC 2 2 2 I .- ; C) D)oral 2 2 4 I 5 I 4 . i 0 I avCek I 1 2 2 6 6 1 12 2 3c1 RdWIMoILM/n\n'amull0.il I 1 2 2 6 0 Toll,1 6 IS 6 31) 1(4 011 1S 47 3 77 Notcs (numilers i-et'e to lef't hand coll,umn Scrial No): (I)arbrae slioes (est. 1 970), I em pIo\ cc: electrical alippliances 1997) 5 employees ( Photo I b) (3) ((hx a) (Grocerv, tilre repail: ( Rllet. pre 1992) RLestauIrant: clothit-ig (2): plperl pro-dUctsK Lised bicycec sales/r epair: Illolne\ chatloe;r locksmith.: ckiuarl-Clic P (I11 )1 ilattcr: tire shIops (2): arage; restatltrant: snack shiop (Phloto 4b) (4) (rent, I pC- 1 992. I post 1'992) *** * (1attldlromIaZt?) (I'lloto Sb): squi1atcLr Ci (7) Reilt. pre 1992: I ire repair. car accessories (Photo 7b) (9) (O\l I) (2): (Rent. post 1992) (2) (Ihlioto 9b) (10) (()\\1 0) baker\, \\ ith 5 partners (relatives), (rent, pre-1992) Clothing slnlop (Plhoto 1 Ob) I 2) ((h\ a1) bakcr: (rented)alllillitnllu workshop in basement (lPhoto I 2b) Tale)c ,k4: Mlobility of Smiall Businiess Entrepreneurs to he lResettle(d Distance Ifro I1esid1elnce PrclcriId dli t(flcc I I ( ) I I1 A .m h1o,ioe ol ,tr\vel to \\ ork t WiiK preseint to Lt,t,, . atill G .rade Separlationi______ ___________________________ ____ ._t;Il ction U U~> II$(2il ;1d-Af"dI 2 1 1 1 3 AI;I-pm(11 I( 3) 8 9 2 4 MU1LSIMITI-I;II;I :) I 4 4 1 4i 5 N1;Rt. MokIllacl 3) I I - 7 -1 .younilchl.,.o (S AdIleh'l 3 I 2 , I * 13C1l;,,,,O,1,. !i\, ~11)lltI_ I I I | I .otlls29o 3 2 I lII ()6) () 9I 4_1o)- Table A5: ILCegal Status of, Rzelited( Occupied ltesidenices and lBusinesses to he lResettlcd( A)aartmlenlts No.) lBusiicss plremises (No.) Graude SCparatioll _ .JIUIctionl Total Old Law New Law Total Old Lawv Ncev Law I l3eital-Atl:al 7 6 12 1 1 . Airpolrt 2 8 8 4 Mlushalrralich I I D Mar NM/ckhael 2 1 1 7 Iay!ullich 2 2 9 Dora 2 2) I H -layck I I I 2 [3C I 1110 LI II/A 1I11a10till 1 t'otals 1 9 ( IX 13 5 T'a) I iA: lt usiliesses Af't'ecte( hy byN iiior Impacts (no Resettlemenut) . rdSeparation N iuim ber _ ( .Ial e Selia tat inn .-\ ifcdle Imiipact Action Requiired . . liBusinesses ;11 Squtaltter nlec han ic shacks o11 nllulc ipa bnyiiv ,) S, Lattei, ,ccshcko municipa (1 1) illay move.forther back ill samlic lots (tcilnlpolra\ land requirii-es reilmoval (Photo 2b-I)c b) Coffee Kiosk to lie moved; c) Gas station C | r " | * ' . ~~~~~assesssnici-it anid awvard ol' finanici;al conipcn-ls;'il loss ol frontage; d) old basetent with ino I aNa R Rechara 1'1 KliouLIy 5 access; c) storage shack. iuia\ requie relocation with 1)()1 assistance N ilnolr impact oni bakery (pliloto 3b- I F'. C. Fi nacia] coipensat(in for loss/da maCe l I.k 3 Airport I goold. N,! i .nor i inpact on llasement. 1K C. Financial compensation folr loss/CInlllaoe'iillulik I NMliioi- Iimpact oji basemlent.,oo I ~~~~~~~~~~~~good. F'. C. Fiinancial compensation fOr loss./daina,cmiialc 5 N lar NIelekhalel I (Canopy of ,as station affectecd. g a. Canopy of gas station af'lectcd: b. I.oss o. fron,pat o ho Iding (flo rin b (ii.1 ) '. C. Ii nancil,a comlpensat io lon lr o Fonlto part ol' bildting¢(I'lool-ing shopr) loss/c;lail;lac/makllc good c.l.C nlia coiisi(flei 1lr1iltle (Photo 6b); c. basement extend(Is iilto l ) ( 3rie Scinaanl 35 pubRlic doBinali. will b fc ;1 :ted(3. COImilpeIIsa;ion sees likely. GA61-le Scii i JIIbliC I1011(SLO Wlkli be 11TCOCd. 3 . NI Move fItLhilerli) back within in samile renlti lot I) 5 Axieii, I pre 1992, to be mio\ ed (Phloto 8b). cominpeilsation foi loss,damage/miake iood. NMmltol 8 Adliell~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Ltoils Gias Station PuLIMps and tanks affected Move I'irtliler back in samile lot: 1' C. fMi iacial *) l)ora (Photo 9b) compeilsatioil For loss.danma nc/iakc (ood. 1K C. Fikinicial comlpeinsation f`or loss/danmiace iiimkc Nl Ii nor loss olf gas stationl I'lolnta I1 la\ ck -ood. Gas stlation pmILI1p alld tailks all'ectel Relocate in remiailnIer of lot: lF. C.lila ile .ia I NI kalles I (Photo I I b) provision or imake good. Gas Statioi PLi,lps aiid taiks affected Relocate ill reillilder of' lot: E. C. financial I 2 Blhlamllolun/Allllmoln I (hoto 2b) provisioni or iake cood. Total l 8 I a 1 1 : ILanuI ex If I o iarlsllo ( Iassifica I i rs II I IIII pCI and (IuitIllvI,Iealkt (includes ;t dI l s I, I(111(t1e1 m.mlo-l A I'll v . Gsl:i:l vrgII. 1~ )(rubnai,l( 2. 111u1ame It. SubsIanIal illipjoC1. _ 1 iI1 rl C zs1lul> I 55j l lills 1: (;S>XSMlilm l 1 1,I .1r icl( I 2 liCll l 11- aS i>i;f rb\... C ,,I e j xpf 1,, ('111 xIlt i .,H. CM*I. t1 ind t5If c l5.lol n sIilliciciul, 1-.( Illan 101 22 ,, I.. sI Ca t tc i t -it o d ",I imI d I ,~ ''Id S M m. - hI" 1:11c is*ljulil Ill IIx dislrlibuuled lcuiuC nldicatlcl .1it ItI listl l I ill1ll1-\lici 11 24) 2)5-I 4 14-i I 6 2()S 3 12 7i 2 I46 12 I i2 _ l c 1, r [ l. I, I 22 1 25 r IS 2 42 4 -25 I i 42 11) 1)7 i41 9 2S i II | | 1 i \S,ilss 17 1 s6 1I") ; I1 1 I 2 Q6 272 7 i7 I I I N i-Ii lm rll , C Ii 12 122 I2)7 2 62 7 11 12)) IrS) II 7 . t 222 cl, t1\1 d11' i I I IS 2 N)im NlI,kl2,1 IO i) 1960 I 53 2 2 177 7 2i Yil s (1 1I 1 i 42 I 7/ . )ilcric sc.nSwin 32 6,) 4126 2 754 1 4 383i 126 ii 1417 3 4 12 7 22s 2si 7 1 M Ot) .llI) S 14 93 2 I I Ys I 1 76 I i 2 2 9 742 R AdI lioll 12 9)11 945 2 96 2 33 99 7 12 543 1 42i j12 9v boI)m a I 47 42S1I 3 5 S13 4 15 120)3 3 I)) 6- )2 6 17 2i22 I)) 11 ICI. 2Y 41)(, iS i4 2 2 5( Y 2 12 1251 17 2S1 l I ) i 2 72 239 s jl 72i 11 NMI.,ilc I I I 21i2 i 1i4 2 I 2522 i I 225 2 1 255 II - s- tuld 2'9)8 51s 5)N 122 I'lo rr1soill Awril. 05 7 22 2272 I 2 2 7i- I I I fS i ,I I 22I . et, 22)k) 72-1 2722 2) '51 i Irt1- 222i 1427 322),) T 5 326532 IS X 21,2 27 1 lO 711Y 1S4 722 1 )IS7 1Y 33) 72'. li 211 1 1; Nocs I numberil cr l dc,r to) columinlcl Ictlelr SC,) ulii,lc RIet lli 1,1ic1 LIC'WrM d fo1 Ir c\pwImlrrlatrl m1Cidr I lprod ,ii, IIcCCC souIl it)1 trr c l'll intre dcC)oSu Ira) l,c h it5ltirCIi.cil d m .) si llo tiles Alt uclld alic NlFl),)lsch M ail- md. 22 I 2 ) Ii) ri,, iNmori) ) ire I11 I I'lIc l1rC)Ihtlc\ .)c 01211cr )ILUI)ici)1l 2)) Iiii)d motu d for a))) Ln0i))I11U 1,l pu1-1pslSCl II CTle irlc,it L))2ind or lir e l itt, s 22he )))lmWp t2 52 k )1to 20ci )1ri. I 1,- zic t s n Incliei d If Ilic RAIi -Il) 11.2)S i,t 2l,) Ill 111 CIsli)L)))) (I C )s)lial o C5pr0prillionla) of Il)Iss SS or ICtidcDLC at 1511 r c msl en)ct Cost l))rrlcIo 15lsl I ll 2112, COIIMIi ) t iIC nuilelCd 2cllmpclnsmict)1 r am I) )I15)1C prrelpidice stdilcrcd, Or \ ll r[ccixe) somoilcOlIet ac l oi ts e)ic i CIli)Ilci)t)e lllc,,h fle ) c ,1)2 he able IoCi ,I Llrc , aciliC11LC to co, cr losscs All gad st)i 155II airC mIC Lided licre 2(: (1\ OHerO o l t lots C u tlIs CII1)1 is2l losre less than 10 pcr celi ol'Ilhc lot arca lnid idual cases demonstrating prtcjudccc sufflered are ert)Irlcj tsr CI1I)pI)Ts1tlrO (IC g for Isiss sI illltl t21)o III1)J C)thcrisisc ills er) ssl'tht se plots arc 1,t1 -Xpctled to lose alue, because of improted accessan d1 pro1p1em al,ws brought b, tluc h le I . ct 7 Iris \\ Itid he dcll l istmiru d sire Iss saC 2( 2 1 i IS Of I1 kts I 21112l C))IL))l5) sstulid suIICr l)SIgIllfiCicall 1urIpacts i cts 1cr a) l ra ca,use Ilse alus oloe lote cxrrprsatlout is losny (less 111011 1) sil ml I) ir b) becazusc lic lll1 pact is sgli\ slsIltilod t iough , e rticail ldi\ iso)109s, each o12 user osqmirs less th111a I pcrceii1 ol [lie Irlos stirliacO lnd,s dul.I Prejudiu0c \%o11d [Ic Co ptrc)ialed al the diScrctnon) of the Cssmt )l) s)lons I Ii 'rur1r,Ircalt I IlpacI and). lrsclrlrsss l r,I los requitin 11 1g 5I2 ) Cslg it lslon dcratior 1 tIr\ lic F\l)slisp tiol Cor))1i5s5on)1 asrd rpsdls ILIo,III ll)55O5i5))5))l 1 11)de Ak. Cost (S '000) of Rcsetticiienlt Components aind Options Silc chanles c I xpropriatio Bank SafetLlard Po icies, added costs ol options I otal |3 le ius. aLind Ftill Co lI ess "F l.ess "[ Less "D" Less "C" No. IValue No.1 A-icI I Valuie ,,I\,, S 2 3 4 5 6 7 x 9 /0 n 12 Lot areais (Less ''C) l3ici al AfW 1173 (1(0 50 5 13 3918 2247 1935 9 1935 4 1(095 1643 75 740 220 60 Bichara cl Khour,v 541 7 25 23 905 8-02 774 18 711 3 120 180 30 54 36 i,-lrport 3(62 12' 225 1I 1514 1514 I13 I I SIX 2 341 341 146 195 Nicinafiel-;ilitl 378 10 1 25 252 ' 73.9 173,) 1485 13 10(10 3 280 195 88 42 15( Mmit Mklacl 1355 228 50) 1(077 X863 17X1 1518 I 0 242 2 3 76 564 '14 162 Gal Scm11 I(088 23 75 990 5289 4083 1I()83 26 3491 7 1567 2il I'11 419 256 68 1'91 I I klIo1-1n1n1 3*16 113 50 254 145 1145 1()11 3 6 899 5 71i5 11I18 464 115 65 62 39 Adlici 373 () 75 ''X 1i9' 1 1.110 ° 9 12 -1 207 D)orn 1 54 12 150 992 757(1 757( 741()1 ' 4998 6 2355 4710 474 391 193 33 3 78 S66 I layck 1 266 36 50 1 1I80 2654 2654 2086 24 83 2 720 72(0 167 162 122 166 1(). NMILlics 96 0 25 71 4224 1709 1 709 5 557 2 188 282 61 127 13t 1,1111m1.unI-AlrWIaon 284 1' 75 194 1637 1637 1420 4 678 3 2319 696 17111410 738 Tot.1 789'9 1166 75 34(48 28321 258391 144 1738N1 43 10313 1326i4 l I .ot ilicllidc ;el-\ iltidic h oiil I ist 1 All Co\ c-iiiilcli. iiiiillicipal or cinhiissy land. I'lic k AI' *i)ll) co\crs cxpiropriiiil oipi iviltcitp lauddel I ist 1- 18 IOIs W'illi 1LIlI cOiItpCiisatioli Iorl rcsitlcicc ol bIsilncss o\\ nlesl)iip ;1iid iLmiuc\ I ist I) 28 lots 1i0) gas station, busilIess ilpacts comIpensated , or (b) 40o of expropriated area is compensatedl at full colmmissioll tinit valuation L ist t Ver\ niiiioI inpact: 1I)1 lots, 6715 sqII in.. wee eXrorialionil is eit]el (a) ILIder I 0 ")oftotal iaeai ad iot o\ver 500 q in or (b) uLider 15 ool totall area, affectinc Ii iich rise block with over 15 owners and( sUbdivisions, orl or (c) an area less tlanl 10 sq in Valucs civen ar e foi- total expropriated ar ea at Expropriatiouu Commlzlission valuation s. Notes to Table A8: Cost of Expropriation The attached Table A8 shows how the added cost ( x $1,000) of implementing Bank compensation policies is derived, site by site. The columns are numbered 1-12 in italics for reference. Column I shows the estimated total cost of decisions by the expropriation Commissions, using values given by the CDR expropriation unit ($7.9 million), and cols. 2, 3 and 4 give the components of buildings. business compensation, and land. The incremental costs of applying the Bank's safeguard policies under various assumptions are shown in cols. 5-7, 9 and 12. These costs also are based on the values supplied by CDR expropriation unit. a. The full additional costs of paying for all land are over $34 million (Col. 5). But this amount includes land other than private land. b. If non-private land (government, municipal etc.) is excluded, this reduces the area, and the costs to $28 million. c. Omitting the two categories where compensation for building, business or land over 25 percent is adequate to cover the remainder of the land taken, there remains a total of 144 lots, valued at $17.4 million. d. Most of these 144 lots are characterized by either (i) minor impacts; (ii) highly distributed modest impacts (e.g. a small strip of land from an apartment block with 30 subdivisions) or (iii) expropriations that are tiny in absolute terms (less than 10 m2. Omitting the 101 lots in these categories reduces the area of major concern to 43 lots, 10 462 m2, and a total value of $13.3 million, using CDR estimated valuation. SCIIEDULE No. I STATUS OF TIlIE LOTS AFFECTED) Biv TIlE PROPOSED) EXPROPRIATION DECREE AT BElTf Al, AT'FAL JUNCTION Niumbhr ofArimet Nibeorstp fcied Etimiated Bluilding Estinted -(~crh1 * 0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Affected 0ompnnainIhhiics ~~~~~~ ½ - .2 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~c - - - 0- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ E ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~. E ~ COr 0~~~~~~~~~1 C 4>a= I 1599 1 863 V 161 563 161 0 0 F 0 0 2 1600 577 V 2 4 1 84 241 0 0 F 0 0 3 1601 619 V 2 9 117 29 00 F 00 4 1603 290 13 4 3 24 7 0 4 I C2 120 3 5 66 00 V 7 5 985 0 ~7 13 -6 1 59(87 1 207 B 1 1 1196 0 II1 I C 3 7 2 3 7 3142 695 V 41 654 0 41 6. C 2 I 8 5985 4 901 V 1 387 3514 162 1 225 25 F 0 ( 9 1145 3 487 B3 740 2747 0 740 21 B3 6 2 10 4468 388 11 3 88 3 7 I 0 2 I 0 2 439 0.25 610 2 25 50 III 0 0 E 6 3 I 1 445 1 2 683 V 220 2463 I) 22(0 8 1B 15 3 12 1131 2 8 1 MJ 60. 22 1 II 60 21 B 2 13 1132 509 II 79 430(1 716 2 266 14 1139 28(1 B 2 2590 21 8 C 63 ITOTALS 118 840 276 13 9681 3 7 1 0 49 60 25 32 21 329 5 S(IHED1I Ii; Ni. 2 Si I I S (I I III I O1 S 112 Ill) In V jail: l,R01,0SI* ) a*.Xruol'itI i I Io-N nuai*;-I I r -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~AS Z_ t I 7 ' 27') b3 8 1271 1 0 0 0 (9 I 4 737 53 Ii 24 ~ 4') I) ( I_24 4 1 I I 5 73I1 S,13 I I 4 WQ) I I )I 4 I (2 I I, W III 79 V_ 17 0) I ) I 1 722 I ) I I 214 I 53 H ( Ii2 ( I S (I 1 7 '0 I I Hi I I 6 (3) I I I 25 Ii (1 II I i Il 0 6 I I I 0 675 777 2 I ___ 272 H 00 0I I 6 I II 9'4 2-75 V 24 251 1 1 0 24 (1 C I h 12 oI17 1244 5' 61 08 3 II 0 0 I61 I I( I I13 675 78HH I 42 282 7 1 I )I 25 25 II42 I I) 3 I 1 4 00h 3- 54 V' I ) 52 I I I )____ I )3 ( _ II I I f II SI I 105 I) I) II(I 7I I I I 7('8 Q'05 V' 2 )3 I 1 I 20 i V 11)112 731 II 1~~~~I5 Is) 4I1) -4 44 OlS 7 __ I 5I) I I S I)1 W 79 \" 54 722 1 0 90 54 2) I 1I) 7154 V5 5 38 511 1 0 )I 38 7 C 1 79 1lH5 3W ~~~~II 2 3 293 0 D3() 23 7 1 71 1)119 Vs V ~~~~~~3~ 0 ) ( I 35 1 ( H 27 11)7 '0)4 14 36 I168 0) 22 1)' 30 1 8 I I' US 1 ,15 58 133 6 (I 0 ( 4 ( 0 5 ( 4725 5 5534 15 35 II I SCIIEDULE No. 3 sTATUS OF TIlIE LOTS AFFECTED BY TIIE PROPOSEI) EXPROPIRIATION DECREE AT AIRPORT JUNCTION Nu niherof Apailiiencns Nunibero (ShoPs Lstinmated lBuildinig E.stimated Busincss _Osiihp 6 ~~~~~~E Affected Affecte __ Conmpensation Compensation *'S~. C. '~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. 2 -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ C..~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. U~~~~~~~~u w U w C 1 6665 720 V 19 701 ___ 00 0 19 3 C 3 3 __ 2 379 485 II 36 449 0 0 1 0 36 7 C 12 2 3 372 227 1 II 264 2007 0 0 0264 12 C2 95 57 3 2 2 4 363 1 322 Il 215 1107 2 I 3 1 462 0.15 69 4 25 100 0 215 16 C: 5 3 C - Q{(C I) 'C Vi~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 01)I 6 2998 302 Il 40 262 1 20 0.1I5 3 I 25 25 0 40 1 3 1C I 7 2997 286 II 62 224 3 169 0.15 25 3 25 75 062 22 v I I 836(0 7 19 R 149 570 1 69 0.20 14 I 25 25 0 149 2 1 1 1 9 5 135 1017 II 146 871 0 0 0 146 14 BI 5 1 I10 5 136 j1509 13 15(19 0 0 0 0 0 C 2 2 II1 5 137 1 447 03 66 1381 (II1 66 5 C 2 2 12 6700 1Q301 V 76 1 854 )0 I76 4 C I I 1 36699 2080 V 7 1 2009 I 00( 7 11 3 C I I __ _ 1 46698 2000 V 24 1 976 (1 0 (I24 I C I I IS5 34 11 72(0 V 1 95 525 58 0.10 6 0 1 5 180 25 13 3 2 20 16 4657 84( v I10 830 _ _0 0 0 10 II C II 1 7 5 138 2634 V 8 2626 __ _0 0 0 8 1 0.31C2II TOTALS 21142- - 1- 6 19726 0 2 1 (1 2 8 I 0 8SW - 2.05 9225 1 5 1401 7 1 996521 S( II:)llJA L: NI,l 4 Sl II's OF II. LO E D BY'I II'ROI'i OSED EIX'ROIUI I IION DI)I('C EF A I' ItCh \URFI11:11.1 N NC II ON r -o N. , - , limated, IIIildil lis E'stimated 13s,si -ess _ _ ,_ _ _ _ _. _ _ E~~~~~~~~Z I 117 1IS71 II Sl 1 7)11) S 1 J 72 t') I I loo IM I II 4 1 9 O~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I Al 4 3 I 21 2 Il kIl II 41 1' 21 8 1-I .~~ 1,153 II~ 111 ~ 11. __4 _ 2 , ' (iii IlS 1;_'2 _ I II 1211 IS I __._,___ I12) 2252 V' 121 21.1 -" (I Ii 121 ; I I _ . '5'1'_ 1111 _I 1( I 123'9 = = = = ==5 _' 4 7 16 125 II 2S 2t117 _ = == 2S 2 2 I I s1 73 1121 2 1 ,S l1o 125 I 2 5 25 II 16 I 1) I I ; '2111 524 1t 7 517 I 6 _____ _ _ 7 I _ _ 6' 11 I11 III I I 2 I I II 2 I I) I-)5 111S2 I I lo! 1117') 7_ _ _I 11)3 'J I 6 1 1.5151 6 ) 52 S ) 93 I_ I) . 4 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 52 5 7 : 511' I6 ; 1111S 14X1) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 111 8 4 _ _ 1, II 111J4 253) II 42 211 __ _1 _) _ _ _ __. _ () () X12 17 ) 1S 7 1; 1 7i" II 21> ,9 _ _ 2 5 8 1)15 II I) 26 4 f I I . - f1 75 13 1;1 7 _3 (1 1 113 1I 1 4 I) I I 17 71S 1 (.7 tIC' 21 11 _) II 21 2 C 4 4_ 1 S 5 1 174 11 S1 11171) D O SI) 8 17 7 1 11) xI 1.32I. I J 1,147 P)J47 1I I 4- 2 - O 7 l 1_ S('l:11111 I.A: \,, I SltIt HS I IIII I ()IS \11 1 I( IF1D 1)I IllI IOI I I)N DFUlEt I\M I \ IR 11111 \11it 1 11 It I )N _) _07 1ll)' \' _'J 103' __ _ _ _~~~~~~~~41 _4*4 _ 4 _rr,, _ 414, 1) o'" Irs 1111' I ___ L' >- oS') li 1(>1 3((.,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1'1)3 {)1yn -o() e}~ ~ lo -) -) 1)141 7 - _ 4'-~~~~~~7 W, UV 06 4 i7 96(I( ~ - 6 I 3 I o V 11 614 _ _ _ _ 14) I_____ _ t _ I ._ 1' I "7' 244 I I 3S 725 S1I I 3 I ('2 I Ii 7 | S 286 V |95 91 || 124 72 | ; 1) )9 .1 I I 6 ' I 1 I I I olk, B~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 -4 4 S( 7 7-17 1 1_ 21 2 2 52') 115) 2 2 2 52 1 8 2 111 U I Ii1 1 4 1 1 s 1 17 (1 II II17 4) U 1) 2 755 ;U77 4I 12 25 4 C 4 2 1 251 3535 i 4' 442 '77(4 (7, (6+(2 2 C I ] 4 -I -I. 54 22443 4'' ~~ 0(4 7)4 ) U 104( 5 C 2 I '| IS | .3()| \| | ();V 2 13 (0 7 13 C2 I I 444444 13244 II 5 4 1242 8 2 4 54 6 C1 I I 42 I 04(0 \V 16(2 53 I ) ( I62 1 6 II1 5 -I I S 444 16(4445 (is 2444 S0l I 2i 5 75 2 6 4 25 5 I) (4 44Q(I I 30)5 5 II2 C2 4 I ' 5 72 111 V 5$ 311UM 4 5 C II IIII -I - - - lI I1524 292 I I I ) I 2 2 1.1 15I 7 474) .4 27 4 0I 5') 2s S(1HEDU)1LEl \,,. 6 S I' \ It S ()F II Id( l * Ff I ED RI I 'IIF P '()SF.I) DE\X 'lt(l'RI I I O(N I)DF( IU ' F .' G k1L( RIF 1SEI 6 \N jUN6 I lI(N ,I _ S _ _11.1,__ I'll 19i1 _ 34 15 1) l p l l t (l ( ' I 2Pil "s a _.I 6 _ _ 6 '04},J,'l 7il2_ -1 1; 'i2l; l } _ _o __7_ _ _ - _ _ _ _3 ; 7i 2 ) 2 i I I 7 '0|9u I; 11 11 13 I I I I II (II) 2) ) ' Fl 4" .' 0 97 v S) _, I _ If _ _ _=2 ( 2 11 4191 213 I) Ft 12 20)i 126 6 _ _ 6 '9) 72 9 9 ) I' 2 1 69Ii V 141) 36 2 t IA 11 59 112 7 (is 1 145225 2 5 ) 1 I 12 I I I 4260 2)90 I C 1 21) I I 2 C I I ' )2I I5I I 11 827 -,211 I I) 12 I I 7) ) I 177) I I ) I ) 6) _2 1 -- P) 4) 9 2223 II 126 )7 2 _ _ r6 2 -6 - _ _ 13 42 46') 2 141i 28 - - ---_ 9 lI6) II2 65 I 14 .12 1426 ( I o 7I 14))I 2 5 I) 215 I) I IS 42,) 41)5) II 7 1 -0-- - -I 16 37 C I 6 1" I ' 7) 22 R 2)S 1666 9If2i 2 1 25 2) II 2 2) B ) 29 p)) III 7~ D) I I) ) I I 12 2 ,o -~I(S -805 3) 22))) 6T fI) )) C ,ILI'4 1 51 ) V 23)4 27_____ 2 - -) 7 C 3 ) I 126 2 III) 32~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 63 () 3935 ) " 22 5)9' 192) 2 ~~~194 1 22) ___… 611 SW 19 ) ) _ kl,S 5S. 1 65 5I 1 17 U - - - -~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I I146 I S(ClIII'I) I I 1 Nfl. 7 s EA I I S O1111 ILOMI S FF FI:IIII"I ) ~ItYI I I F PIM MSIKI) I*;X IlA)PR'II I ION I)l:(A It;I' Al IXAVOUNNEIKII .1UN('ION \tt,l,Ipc tiAj ct,lll, NumI,cr tf silps i.lsiiiiaitcti Buiiilding I1.stiliiiacd I1iisiiics - - -- Uicclcd - fclcd - (n~puI%dIihl (C1Compensat ion -IIt - L.~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ t) It 606 B I It 7 I I) 4I 12 2 I 9112 ~ iS B 1 65W .Th M 5HI I t .197 546 7 T __ 0 1 _ I 7 13, 1 II- \ f0' ,21 2 __ I62 I ~ 14 I I - 8 31) 99 1 \I 39 3 11 39____ _____ W 1 I 101 X)IA L 74121 93)2 ((hI D Ull 1 1 ( 2 0 1 ( 86 1 3( -2 5( 114 8211 1 3 1 4 6 1;-- - 1 3 S( lill)l lEl: NX,. 8 SI U I S IIO I IIl.I.) I SA.I2I:F .1A I.I) 1 'I1LI'ROI'POSIED IENPROPRIATIION I)I:(RI.l1 ATA DI).I I),111 JNCTION _~~~~~~~~b _ x,,,,, , m,I.,r -lml,lil ,,1t .,I "Im,,,, Eslimme BildalIlingilz L:%fillia:ted Illisilc>s __ ,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ;,i_,__4ji.aoi (',;ic,, _1.14) -l l -; - t -3 4x 1(}'() S(17 1 '7 IS() = = = = = = = = = _ -() (> 27~~~~ -, -( ( .p ' -17*',) 702 B 5'7 1 2 1 _O_ _ () (I 57 8 I, I ( _ I _ , 174 ' ( 5 U(' ' l 1 1( 5.' O( ()7 5 3 5 c 2- -17 10} -(9 1) v i-I * I -_ () (} 54 6(, 7 - 2 -(',,~~~~~~~~ - -n,-(((}-! S, 2;_ - _ _ _ _ _ - )( - 7 -. _ l i 4 -, 3 101) \7 X(~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ,- - 7- 1 [7,9 2000) \ 172 7211 C S 755-1 I'.h5 I( *9 IS( .12 25 o2 ) ( 9 I ) 2 I _1I)- 1')5(1 93 V' .77 _ _ _ _ 60 5- (7 1 3C 2 1 . W Ž47 30) V377 _______ I ' I ((15' I 2'1-1 \' 151 7(" ___ _ (1 ')I ') 15 (.1 7 __ 911- I )) I5 \1 1 {I 2 24 55 {1 3271 IJ) 32117 149 913 8' 9 , 10 18)5 12[7 '~~~~~~~~~~ -'~~~~ 4) (4 (I II I U (1~~~~I_ t. - C - - - -S,I -ID 1 EN . S 2187 3532 II 257 3275 4) 44 H,2d57-d 7 u I mCI II Iisaiol 7 95 117 V 3 1 72 I69 41 127) 2 I 14 ' 4 ' 4 373 856,s 4 4 7 16 II I o /) I 1 4 H ____7_ 21 i- I i 24 70 I ) II I 4')8 H 566 3')32 ____ 44~ ~ B 566 23 B V 341 3 8') V1 271 3758 0) 42 71 73 C SI 6747 I i48 3'4 7 64417 I 25 2 5 I 62'I6 2I 6) I 7 68S I I 1 7 B 1 7 20 I 6 15 4 5 2 I 7I 25 I __ __ I __I I _ _ 3 15 564 B 251 I) S 'S ~ 6S4 344 352 I I I 2 2 I II X 34 _ 1.5 ,___ IS) 945355. 2.955___ 4 23 I S( 11o1.1)t.1 \o 1III SI It s OF I ll. 1.1115 Als I IA I IID Bi fill' lIR)INSH) DU RI I IlA k IIL% . I N( I ION 7. , I S I' (8 1) 5 Ii I Il Oh0 1 7 71 0 1 198 II I 4,I '(67 F 10 421 2I 7711 ___I _2_ 2 I A 10 I "I(I 69 7 J_ I I '1-0?7 1, I II 11 82 87 I,f 172 3 1) II 7 O)____O (I 17 4 1 I, 1171 8))) II 47 71)1 I) I) 1) S17 5 C I 080l') I I 11 I I I2 711I I INSI ),' (1 II 0 7 I Il Il1 1 I 1,,I2V I I (d__ I III Il7 II 71B II II((7 () 11 ( 12 __ (ol (IIII .176 I I I7 1 (2 1(25 7(11 V 122 1712~~~WI II ( I 12 ( ( 1 (9,117 I211 09 it 17 ((( I II I 117 1 II I I7 (2170,1 ( I ((7 1171 _______) 1 1( 22 1 7 I 2 I (''1, O2)1 V I ('1)I DI (I Il 66 - 1) Ill 3 1 1 1 1 12 SA2 13 IN) 726 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~7 7 I 142 8 T7162 14 QAi 1 20( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~1 II S 11 47 I 1 - 9i 7 1 00 it S I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~O I 1 113 17 I 1) A N' IIN I jo I I(( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I 17 7 I I Q 00 I 't)t, v~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~7 1 II 7 1 151 1 (oi I 100 13 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~87 11 .1 5 71- 1 II (I (1 5~~~~~~S 71 c) 2 271 WI (((7 8 77(1 8117 5I II (1 771 C2 51 I 1111 711.1 48355 48(13 32915 II II 2 II I I II~~~~~~~~~~~= I 24') 41 2 ___ 11 I 114Il 1 181)1 2624 - (1, 24 I S I I s 1 ( I IIIF LO 1 1'1:1) I I 1 .I I II I PIM)P'(IKI) D -.\PRO1AP II x I ()\ DA (k1IK1'.1 t I \I I . S .1 N' l V FION . _ . t _ _ _ t ____ _ ___ N- l t, |, L ~~~~~~~~~~~~. ,,I...,I. SI,,x, ilmil:led lllmlltrikUhll>- . _._ I' 9 7 lo 0 _ " ] 0 |7 I 62 II~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,iI)I%Ii, i 1 111 -'- 1;') 11'.N \ '7<1 -- 1,l7,y (} (>--------- -- - - - ----- ----- (> _(>_ () -37() - - ' r Zr - W1;-. - - -X-:- ' ' . 6. _ _________............_____ I iI LIl''I'"l',l; lxl l il-,-,l " I t ~~~~~~~~I I-I (I I I I . . i ( 'Il I III 7 II (1 II (3o 4 UlFlt 1-el. I 's s 1 2 Il ~2 I I II t 1 LeII: 11v:f 0 I t I ) 17 - - I I I I I) I I1:1=1lI_1:--XlII i01 is . ,1l(l(I5, '1'l1 5')IN 1 _ ( .4)- 1 ')14, II II I ii )|4 I I I I) II ____ ____ J -17 71 } | I1 l l{ l4 SCII11.)1 1.1 No,. 12 S I I s 01 I III, I M S .AIHI:( I I.I1 11\ 1 III I'lRI'MSI I) I1\A'PIM'RI YIIN 1)1:( D RIA. \ F IIAMMlN - AR 0\10IN .JUM(A ION _ _ _ \|1111']t'1 <,l \,,, 1,,,,,,1 x,,,,11,,- ,,t.I S,.)p' ' "fio:wtcd B lg dil(l,,, I'Stima:t,ed Bil('ille,ss \ i ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- - - - - | _ - -¢1t Cu iGkt J.' 5 '7 11 I 7 ,'t) 2 I I _ _ 25 2i 2 2 5 5() o o () I __ I * 7r' -siw V ('-,7 I -WI 17 ( 647 () ) 1' I .iS 75 ;, \' 65 21( 1I, 'z) () (63 8 I) 16 2 *1 -6tio hi62' (iS ((>7 27S I '1_ 25 25 07 7 _ i7 _ _ W 6(8ei .INSt) I (1S' 77') 2)1 _ ( I) 5 3 ) (2 _ _ 7 OI S I I) V 78 7 It6 __ 3 _ I) 735 1 __ Y22 1 7 0 TA. C)(l,286 2573 353(1 10146 2 II (I (I I I I I 1 ___ 254 3 ___ 75 __647 I926, _____ 72 13 7 APPENDIX B SITE PLANS AND INVENTORY OF AFFECTED PLOTS Plans, Lists and Photographic Illustrations of Lots Affected by Proposed Expropriation Decrees BEIRUT URBAN TRANSPORT PROJECT Resettlernent Pan APPENDIX B SITE PLANS AND INV'ENTORY OF AFFECTED PLOTS Plans, Lists and Photographic Illustrations of Lots Affected by Proposed Expropriation Decrees Figure I a: Beit al-Atfal Plan Showing Expropriation Areas List 1: Beit al-Atfal Status of Affected Lots List IA: Beit al-Atfal Status of Affected Lots with Buildings Figure lb: Bechara el-Khoury Photographic Illustration Figure 2a: Bechara el-Khoury Plan Showing Expropriation Areas List 2: Bechara el-Khoury Status of Affected Lots List 2A: Bechara el-Khoury Status of Affected Lots with Buildings Figure 2b: Bechara el-Khoury Photographic Illustration Figure 3a: Airport Plan Showing Expropriation Areas List 3: Airport Status of Affected Lots List 3A: Airport Status of Affected Lots with Buildings Figure 3b: Airport Photographic Illustration Figure 4a: Mucharrafieh Plan Showing Expropriation Areas List 4: Mucharrafieh Status of Affected Lots List 4A: Mucharrafieh Status of Affected Lots with Buildings Figure 4b: Mucharrafieh Photographic Illustration Figure 5a: Mar Mekhael Plan Showing Expropriation Areas List 5: Mar Mekhael Status of Affected Lots List 5A: Mar Mekhael Status of Affected Lots with Buildings Figure 5b: Mar Mekhael Photographic Illustration Figure 6a: Bechara el-Khoury Plan Showing Expropriation Areas List 6: Galerie Semaan Status of Affected Lots List 6A: Galerie Semaan Status of Affected Lots with Buildings Figure 6b: Galerie Semaan Photographic Illustration Figure 7a: Tayounneh Plan Showing Expropriation Areas List 7: Tayounneh Status of Affected Lots List 7A: Tayounneh Status of Affected Lots with Buildings Figure 7b: Tayounneh Photographic Illustration Figure 8a: Adlieh Plan Showing Expropriation Areas List 8: Adlieh Status of Affected Lots List 8A: Adlieh Status of Affected Lots with Buildings Fi2ure 8b: Adlieh Photographic Illustration Figure 9a: Dora Plan Showing Expropriation Areas BE'RUT URBAN TRANSrORT PROJECT Reselenent Pan List 9: Dora Status of Affected Lois List 9A: Dora Status of Affected Lo.s w, ith Buildin-s Figure 9b: Dora Photographic Illustration Figure l Oa: Hayek Plan Showing Expropriation Areas List 10: Hayek Status of Affected Lots List I OA: Hayek Status of Affected I ots with Buildings Figure 1Ob: Hayek Photographic Illustration Figure I la: Mkalles Plan Showing Expropriation Areas List 11: Mkalles Status of Affected Lots List I IA: Mkalles Status of Affected Lots with Buildings Figure 1 Ib: Mkalles Photographic Illustration Figure 12a: Bchamoun-Aramoun Plan Showing Expropriation Areas List 12: Bchamoun-Aramoun Statws of Affected Lots List 12A: Bchamoun-Aramoun Statts of Affected Lots with Buildings Figure 12b: Bchamoun-Aramoun Photographic Illustration PRFJPOFFFD GRFAE srPFRAT`ou III ' L \ \ _ / ) _ _ 0@\ ,s,. \>././:.s ' 'tOT N.,WWA F ,/F f ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~AN~ BUFLDFNG / "'7', 7 L N. i WOO D EXPROPROIIN 01NtY Ad.j;LiN0.51_10X~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ X NO'RT 11 NA ----- -- - - --- - -~~~----- --- --- j f f X X jl \ l ~ - I $ t ?FI I EF _ -'-Vw' 1 '1 ,,/"'X'~~~~~~~~~~~~'~0'* \. -fS ,, I ELOHAW. -KHOURY WOUL M ..,".. I ff1,11 P F Fl' I .IST No. I VllS ()O 'FT I, LOTS AIFIECTII)ED BYTI'E ROIOSEI) EXPlROPlRlATlON D)ECREIl111 At'' DEl'l' A'l. ATI'Al.Z\1 .JLJNC TION . ~ - _ _ .^ _ . _ _-c,,,,,t * - - ~~~E Commtienits I I 599 I S63 I fi I G6 I Lot was affcctcd by prc\ iotis c\propriatioll dccrec 1600 577 24 24 4 ILol was affected b! pre\ iotis exproprialtion decice 1 60 I 6 1 29 29 5 Lol \was aficcled b) I)IC\ iolls c\)plopriaIioll cdecice 4 1603 290 43 0 ( 1 __. _ ij)i iooo 75 ) 7 . 6 159S 1207 11 0) I 7 3142 695 4 I 0 6 S 5985 4901 1387 162 28 9 1145 3487 740 0 - 21 10 4468 3-,8S 20S 111 2439 54 A 6 stoD' building is affected b! tlc expropriation dccrce 11 4451 2683 220 0 - 8 12 1131 281 60 0 - 21 1 3 1132 509 79 0 - 16 . . 14 1 139 280 21 0 - S Totals 18,840 2,954 342 2,439 LIST NO. 1A STATUS OF EXPROPRIATED LOTS WITH BUILDINGS AT BEIT AL-ATFAL JUNCTION Classification of the Expropriation 0 o Shops Residences _ _ Occupied Occupied Explanation ._ en Rented Re ted u) U Owned _ Squatters Vacant Vacant Owned Squatters ~~Owned Squatters 0~~~~~~~~~ A six story building hosting eleven apaitmnents. til owned, one vacant and seven rented. inc linlrr) concierge's apartment, in addition to thiree (qiol< tvJo 1 44638 -11-13 1 6-1 rented and one vacant The building is sw' affected by the expropriation decree and all vill r1e,rm resettlement Lot No. 27, c 6 story building with 11 apartments and 3 shops. The building is severely offected by the expropriation decree. Resettlement is required. BEIT AL-ATFAL JUNCTION Figure-lb PHOTOGRAPHIC ILLUSTRATIC I I .1'/ 1 1 \ .11 1.1 1, 1: 11,1 1~~~/ /1 ,',II \,11 '. N 1.11 1 1.11S11 1~~~~~~~ - - -: - - - -t -/ - - - - -| _ _______ - -_ - - -- - - - -- --L------ -- -- -- ------ -- - - - - - - - - - -J~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ LIS' No. 2 S'1 AlTS 01' 'll'E LOIS AFFECTDI) B ''HllE PROPOSLD) EXPROPRIATION DECRE'E Al BECIIARA El, IKIIOIJRH .JUNCTION _ i~~~~~- t- t- -,rl~_ (u!Ilmc,1lUNl w. _ _ #,. z R . .- - <-=-_ I 7 S 7' S () I 2 73 6 67 9 0 1 3 7 7' 3 8,0 25 0 3 4 732 *7) 24 0 4 5 7 1 S13 4 n n 6 640 76 17 0 22 7 (.634 544 11 0 2 S ,635 47 5 0 11 9 630 4 1 25 15 sec coM111clit 6 1 A telmporary skick 10 625 272 30 0 I I I 1 624 275 24 0 '2 617 1744 61 0 3 13 675 2869 42 0 SCC collillCIII n ( am d aiid plimips ol,I g;is sf;llioll ;IIC ;ar lcclc 14 666 544 1 9 0 , 1 612 I 1 4 8_I 0 7 . 16 628 955 2 0 0.2 2 1 7 1 002 234 45 0 44 1 9 _ 8 (1005 76 54 0 2 20 I _9 154 557 38 0 7 20 1008 31 6 23 0 see commjiliejil 7 A sihck tiscd foi- storagc 21 1010 375 35 -0 9 22 1027 204 36 0 22 IS Aiu old baisciiciii \ iti huo .icccss. Baseuuucuui IcH loun auu old dcuuolislwc(d hIdu Totails 14,025 618 15 66 LIST NO. 2A STATUS OF EXPROPRIATED LOTS WITH BUILDINGS AT BECHARA EL KHOURY JUNCTION Classification of the Expropriation z Z 0 Shops Residences _ _ _ Occupied Occupied Explanation rD , Rented Rented Owned _Y Squatters Vacant Owned Squatters Vacant 1 tOO? - - - 5 - - - - A severely darnaged one story building witth flv abandoned shops A coffee kiosk at the corner of the lot is attr i(J.irii 2 ,1 - 1 will need to be relocated into the reinaiiiirnls tioii the lot A shack being operated as a mechanic shiop its 3 630 - 1 affected by the expropriation The shop cohld h, relocated into the reinaining section of ho lot A gas station is affected by the exp!opriation Effectsare minor Resettlement is niot r-gtnimrd Lot No. 675, on existing gas station is affected. the effect of the decree is minor ond no resettlement required. Lot No. 630. q shock hosting a mechanic shop. The snoo will not require resettlement. BECHARA EL KHOURY JUNCTI( Figure-2b (1 of 2) PHOTOGRAPHIC ILLUSTRATIOi !I¶Th4[ Z >A-Sf I Iol:j Lot No. 612. hosting a coffee and soft drink kiosk. The kiosk could be moved further into the lot and will require no resettlement. Lot No. 1002. a one story domaged building with 5 vocant shops. BECHARA EL KHOURY JUNCTI' Figure-2b (2 of 2) PHOTOGRAPHIC ILLUSTRATIO' . .y Wt~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i ,, j, ' Squatters The lot has two buildings, a two story hrill(ll 110v , Ir r shops, three rented and one vacant, in additior to o n trI- apart tleent on the groiud floor The first floor hro :363 - - 4 - 1 - - 2 - 1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~apartnenits, one rented while the secommoJ is. viicmtiti, I -363 __ .____ seond buildirig isaore story btiidingoldsr rg utln 1s a Ionie o ': 'i om i I shop operated as a bakery The effect of tth' 'c) severe oni the 2 story bulilcding and mvmimrot orn the hak- -r Resettlement is only required for the 2 winy t,iiimrm A one story strLuCtLre hosting a rermted rest;mr ont Ihi 2 3Gm) 1 ---- - restauirant is severely affected by the eYvprn[m:)fitio -J ,-- arrd resettlemnent is requlired 9 7 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~A one stor y boniding h0t1otrrg foLir mci rtr-r I sh- r m 3 armid -4 ------- shops a tire shiop andc a paper prorliri toni- - rgcr3 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Resettlemient is reCtuJired A one story building hostinig tVwo shoprS Lurl ,)/ th? I - - 359 2 grocery store and a tire repair shop Resettl-mr- i requiired Uk ~ ~ k Lot No. 3635 (2 pictures), hosting 2 buildings, o 2 story building which includes 4 shops and 35 apartments ond o one story building (bakery). noting thot one story building does not require resettlement. AIRPORT JUNCTION Figure- 3b ( 1 of 3) PHOTOGRAPHIC ILLUSTRAT1iO Lot No. 359, one story building hosting 2 shops and a residential apartment in the back, only the shops require resettlement. Lot No. 2997 cnd 2998, c one story building hosting four shops. The shops will require resettlement. AIRPORT JUNCTION Figure-3b (2 of 3) PHOTOGRAPHIC ILLUSTRATIO l ~ ~ ~ .- . x:x Lot No. 360, 0 one story building hosting a restouront. The restauraint will require resettlement. AIRPORT JUNCTION Figure-3b (3 of 3) PHOTOGRAPHIC ILLUSTRATIO t I- ' | fll+ollle4~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~------ 1vlewllll\illsSly ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - - - - ------ LIST No. 4 lTi.ViTS OEl4 I-LOVIS AI FFC''LI) iE PROPOSEI) EXPROPRIATION D)ECREE AT l lLfSIIA.RIA.AIEII .1 U.1[NCTIION _ ~~ ._ - . u _ _ ,_ _Q_ _. _ ~~~~~~~~~~~Comenllllts _ EJ l Gs1 6Q _J L - I 3407 1871 SI 0 4 2 3406 1014 41 (- 4 3 1(171 853 28 0 0 15 1I I 2>.8 (694 S8 0 - 13 5 I120 2252 121 () - 0 >43 I 304 (5 0 5 7 546 212 5 28 0 I 8 37 I 129 16 0 9 2134 524 7 0 I I 3 8 1385 150 28 75 . I I Lot is affected by a previous decree. I I 500(0 1182 1 03 0 9 I2 5366 9S6 52 0( S I 30 lo85 88 () - 11 3114 25 42 0( 17 1 I 11) 73 9 20 0 36 4 1 39 1075 151 83 25 14 Lot is affected by a preVious decree 1 7 73 8 1 67 2 I 0 2 IX 9Q 1 174 89 )- 8 Totalls 2 1,512 1,297 112 651 LIST NO. 4A STATUS OF EXPROPRIATED LOTS WITH BUILDINGS AT MUSHARRAFIEH JUNCTION 6 Classification of the Expropriation z _ o o Shops Residences z S __ . _ Occupied Occupied Explaination Rented Rented Owned d Squatters Vacant Owned Squatters A two story building hnsling tf n f nW i 2 i J apartments, one on each floor A three story building hosting five apartments I ho ground floor constituting of one rented apar nti.eit the 2 1671 1 2 2 first floor constitutinig of two apartments occL,picd by squatters and the third floor has two vacant apartmenits. Resettlement is required IiflZ wS~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - -t l. - S \ 4sllorelll94E~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .. i .. I 811141\ .1x1E~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ u I: | I*,lx IS i i, v S >1rf,, ~~~~~~ ~~ 1 1', 1' .\ 11 '.N I I I I i.1'{11~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~i I.IS'I' N,o. 5 s 1'. 1F1 I S (F)I''1 I,OIS I I FCIIKI) IY '1 I'POPOSFI) I AFM E EXPMPRIATION 1)4I('RI4:A: AT MAR NIEkI [I.MIAUN(I'TION _ '_ _ _-_* _ - _-- -_ , 011t'1. 7 -- I ___I_____ I()( 96 0 9 _ (07 I 0) 3 2 1-1 0 - 16 1Lo ol ws al1cctcd 1w pic\ io(Is c\p)Iopi ial ioII dcc icc 5 7 OS) 16 I 16 1 1 203 2 3 l ol w ;is aliccic(l bN pIc\ ioIIs c Ipop I i:It iotI (ICC I C _- *S I 5 1)07 44 lOS __ 42 > >4 ')()2 I I I I I lot \%;Is tItccc(l 19 1p1 C\ iIIs c1)Ii)t lil dciccI 0 57 9 290 0() 0-I__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 7 6S 286 1 95 1 24 6S 8 607 I 1 68 4 1 4 1 4 Lot was afcctcd lb I)ic\ iotis cnpi)op)rialion rlecicc 775 1 1016 53O 0 - 0.5 __ 10 747 2 I 1S 3.6 82 209 62 I I 746 148 1 7 1 7 - I I Lot1 wl S alklfcIc( b\ nI c\ioiis CNI)Iopl;)illioll (ICcICC 12 78S 3077 1 0 4 _ 13 78 1 3838 6 O2 0 __ I 4 22 20 3, 104 0 - 15 56 8 I5 2 0 1 3 1I 606 1 326 84 0 - 6 _ 17 6238S I1(00 162 0 - 16 6_ IS 4556 I 65 264 0 - 2S Calop.\ olt flic gais salioll is IlfccIcd I ) 569 31 0 0 - 2 20 782 1 30 S6 0 - Totals 35,960 1 1,960 479 1,520 LIST NO. 5A STATUS OF EXPROPRIATED LOTS WITH BUILDINGS AT MAR MEKHAEL JUNCTION 6 Classification of the Expropriation . 6 o Shops Residences .s_ ea Occupied Occupied Explanation Rented Rented Owned Squatters ~Vacant Vacant Owned Ee Squatters Owned _ Squatters A four story heavily damaged building with li. 1 58 1-- 6 - apartments and a shack used for selling Iirt.fl are occupied by the squatters ResettlemI(nt i,- required. A heavily damaged two story building with ttiro(o 2 57 3 apartments occupied by the squatters Resettlr-imoit i' required. A one story renovated building hosting foulr Ilin1< 3 _7_ 1 1 2 are vacant and the other two are rented Pu sttIunn i IS eqllired, A gas station is affected by the exproplrition 4 455G 1 _ - Effectsar e minor Resettlement IS not intis n iot Lots No. 58 and 57, a heavily damaged 3 story building with 6 apartments, and two story story building (back) both severely damaged and both occupied by squatters. Lot No. 747, a one story building with four shops. The building is severely affected by the decree. Resettlement is required. MAR MEKHAEL JUNCTION Figure-5b PHOTOGRAPHIC ILLUSTRATIO. EO,'40.'L0A' FF)N 'L O 'OS[l Cqi. LOT NU WlIl I ND ANO DUIIDING EXPROPDATFN LO, N. U_W~Hl ll.t. ARE i 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~; I, ---~~~~~~~~~~~:tj>~~~~~~~~~~~~~,,.,,,~~| t',111,,, . *j'I 11411 1 , I1.1 111' *1 I .1 ...' , . ....I .....F F. 0o ° R0 LIST No. 6 STAT l l l I I.( OFT I FE( F ID) B YT1111 PROPOSI l) EI XPROPRI ATlION D)ECRE F A\ GA L E RRI E SENI \VA N *J INCFTI()N _~~~~ ~ -- - '_ - . _~~~~~~ _ - .t _ __,__ __(-111t1{ :r U _~ L 4 ij>~ Ej w I - 20)85 1 3 11) 34 (, , 17 22989 419 () - lx I 141fi 2742 I8' () 7 6} p)47 I IS 7() '()___ _ - (') _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 7) 7994 142' I ~ 0 - ()I I (3 ")n I I >78 I~ I S(4 4 291 ()() ')7 * 0,' 44 71 . 4193) 2223 12(, () , 6, 14 )> 42| I47 7 1 ')') > (mp u1( l.\ W1 ; s!;I m tiI Hlt SsIl'i IS 4Th)( 4051.) 16} } () 04 I ( 4 1 9'4 38' 78 0} - 0(_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 17 7')( 37 4!() (, () -) 0. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I S 7 98. 688 _ 6. (0 I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I( 7')' 329 256 j ;1) 24 8 I Iiu, I Il )st \\, sIIIiIItillC. 21) I63 ()5 731S I ' 0( -} _ 23i 1)41 ) 2i(0 204 ()- 7 25 I 4()13 150 137 0 () 9) ______________________________ 2(6 40357 2734 6,8 0) 9)X 11, I;chlseiiic,) ul (1k ).h,.iii!Ji u\Icuds \iuj lihil Lr,li tlI,,l;,l, 77 > 9 1)? - 2!) ) 19t4 () -I () 75 6w195 16,44 1() () I __________________ ___________ (9 o9I')f 1 77(, 129( () 7 '() 9)1I98 1 05) 1 44 () - o I (,2 898, 86S ( () I 1) ,7 '4 0!() 1 85!() 354 () I )9 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 ot uls 58,165 4,136 660 1586 NocII F\oroopri;sioul dcc-c'c iut tlins iliCtiOn iS aI[)PIOvC(l LIST NO. 6A STATUS OF EXPROPRIATED LOTS WITH BUILDINGS AT GALERIE SEMAAN JUNCTION Classification of the Expropriation o o z o Shops Residences 7i 7n Occupied Occupied Explanation a)f t Rented Rented U) cm u Owned @ Squatters Vaca nt O Squatters Vacant m4' A one story vacant building, which was operatinri -C)C) 1 Pizza restaLrant is severely affected by thfo expropriation Resettlement is requirePd A one story bulilding hosting a floor finishill r to,n 2 5 - - - affected by the expropriation The shlop will ii(,el , 2 5 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~resettlement, expropriation affects a SITIN11 1)Ift ii el _____ __________________ _______________________________________________building Lot No. 5, a one story building with one shop. The affect of the decree is minor and resettlement is not required. Lot No. 799, a one story vacant pizza rcstaurant. GALERIE SEMAAN JUNCTION Figure-6b PHOTOGRAPHIC ILLUSTRATIO ----- .1., 1 111' , ..... '\1 /'' // /' /'.~~, , . ,,,,,,,,,,h . / ,,' ,,' .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,-' , 4 i11 1', 1i1[111 \ /,' ,/~~~~~~~~~~I, ( _~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- :Kja L.IST No. 7 STIA F S ()OF TII 1A)I'A'S \ [FFFCI F ) F \B '1 TlII P110 POSED) EX PRIM PRI' IAI() N D) ECIt: EL Al TAYI()UNNNFIKI tINNCT ION _~~~ ~~~ _-, . ,______. -~ (njtimot.s I ')AS .. (,(,f, A(,4 () I )~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I 0 4 8 10 6( 4 6 4 )-I_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2 94 2 8 88 88 86 40 Lol (%as ilcclcdl 1) plc\ iutls C\llol)l1 i;lIiOlI (IccICC ' 23592 (75 11 0 - ¢ 19 4 1233 . (0 65 ( 1_ - l n ! g 7049 n- ° s. r It i lidi) iw.iLd,i 3 1' 7 0 ()( 70 f 25 1 S I.o( as N i lccicd b\ 1p1 c\ ilulls C.I\pop)Filioi (IccIce 7 I (S 434 62 [ 2 - I . L.ol \\s ;ibIccicd Lp pIC\ Iois c\plN) ol ioioll (dccrcc i I * 0')') 400 3, 0 -I() I Totls 7,412 932 I 115 86 LIST NO. 7A STATUS OF EXPROPRIATED LOTS WITH BUILDINGS AT TAYOUNNEH JUNCTION 6 Classification of the Expropriation 2 z 0 Shops Residences ,entOccupied Occupied Explanation a) Ln ~~~Rented Rented Vacant Vacant Owned a > Squatters Owned a g Squatters A two-story building with two rented shops i, 1 943 2 a tire repair shop and a car accessoraes stop Th, building is severely affected by thre exprorrrrrti,r oii tthe shops wilt require resettlemilent Lot No. 943, hosting 2 rented shops a ccr accessories ond a tire repair. Resettlement is required- TAYOUNNEH JUNCTION Figure-7b PHOTOGRAPHIC ILLUSTRATI( 4~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ v~~~~~~~~~ / Ll~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ l {gi i/4Ss S A r 1\ 1 11 1 \ ) /' ' v 6 X ''~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~j '.~ '.'.\111 1.' 111',111 .wL~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1. ''' .~ .------.-.- ____., ___ i,,~~~~~~~~I.,~ , ir>,. 'jI/ ' .~~~~~- ' '-- .,,,,..; X.A'.1 | | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- ,, ,---- Z '- i .~~~ ~ - - I , i 1L1ST No. S sI \ I T S ()I; ' .OIS A 1,E("1'1') EF 'L'I1 E 'PRO10. 1) PR PNI'IE)EXPROPRIATION D) FCREAi. A A D)AL11 JUIINCTIION ___ __-,, -, _ _-,_ U- .. - - X Cp 'mn r I ' 17020 807 27 0 S - 4739 702 ~ 7 0 - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ' 4741' 1055 _ _ ( -S ___ 4 474(0 S03 > 4 0 6 > 5 3-17 *1() 8 0 -- o 1W). 220) 1i ( - 7 7 i I 5 2Olo 1 12 0 - 5 li 1;isailfccd bN pIC' ioll. c\Xplop)i;mlioll (IccICC 8 5-I I '35 0 () I A slick i ;ilfctCL(d 09 -l02() 24 I ' )() 25 - 7 A slIitk is ;ilkcclcd. l,ol il1cc lc b\ po iotoD dcicc I 4S() i 123-1 2 2 ()2 () __ I I I 2I0 12 14 ()4 4 - 8 1 1 ;)S; Illcclcd I) I)IC\ iols C.\I)Iop)lphiloll lcccicc 12 9((7 27157 207 0 ) (1 , Iii ;s II Im pIC\ DUN CNj)li;hIiOII tlccc_ IoJl;ls 4 1 897 9 4-5 149 I LIST NO. 8A STATUS OF EXPROPRIATED LOTS WITH BUILDINGS AT ADLIEH JUNCTION . z Classification of the Expropriation z z o6 Shops Residences I_ _1 Occupied Occupied Explanation ¢z) rin Rented Rented Owned _ Squatters Vacant Owned Squatters Vacant 5554 The two adjacent lots host threo rented h.v I 1 nd 3 operating as a fruLit shop, a flower shop ?nd v b t 4525k1 shop The businesses will require resett lseitr-it Lot No. 5554 and 4929, with 3 shacks hosting 3 businesses. A fruits shop, a flower shop and a bamboo shop. The shacks will not require resettlement. only relocation further with the lot. ADLIEH JUNCTION Figure-8b PHOTOGRAPHIC ILLUSTRATIO I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - :2l~~~~~~~~ -'I I I -- i ' --- 1i1 --s i t-% \ -~~~~~~~~~ / 7N LIST' No. 9 .S l I I FS (O) F 1111A 1.()1 ` A IK11'TEI) IV '1TlE PRIMO S[IA) N -PROPRIATION 1)D ('CR11 AT' I)ORAJ .lN('TION __ ~ ~ _N __- 70 v < X - >, bl - (Comments 0 I > '~ t I ,9-8 I 312 0- 12 RI'llClx.I \0plopr;alioll ol d(ccrCC 2 52 4 162 474 0 - II 3 4858 1078 407 137 - 38 4 4859 262 124 59- 47 A ' S7 A.n I7 - 7 0 r358 S063 370 160 44 (;ai°1p! Imillps;miPSud iiilcigiouiiu t laLks ol'lic gpssliallioe llic iaelfi 7 6S8 1117 '91 I2 - I35 8 687 (08 193 29 29 9 2 2209 3 5 3 0 - 16 10 1600 2114 378 0 - IS 1I 3 .1198 566 0 - 1 12 I 3 1 I 820 71 0- 9 3 4 0743 29 0( I I 1 puill uimps ol ;I p sI;ulioi l ;, ,.;u, 1 ..ili;ml C\p)loI)pli;lnioll ,, (ICI 14 3 8 842( I12 16 ( 16 ____ I I I e oI(I lcgl c' l9llI IJLd dlops h lmlgilgL Io, I lwc tIue l lt- cI lico ,,Id 1it I5 8 84/21 34 3 4 3 4 __SN4 .or cxC loplul)laed 6( 3884/28 .'3 33___ _ 0 33 _____ ___ ____ ___ ___33 Totals 37,655 4,281 496 83 Note Fx\prpralatini deciee at this jlunction is approved. LIST NO. 9A STATUS OF EXPROPRIATED LOTS WITH BUILDINGS AT DORA JUNCTION Classification of the Expropriation 0 0 z oj Shops Residences _i _i Occupied Occupied Explanation a) gn . Rented Rented rao VaatVcn D Owned 2 Squatters Vacant Owned _ Squatters Vacant A one story building hosting five shops, 3 al o..n, I 3881 2 2 f1 o which one is vacant, and 2 are rented Tho hi,ildiii n is severely affected by the expropriation aond resettlement will be required A gas station with its pumips, undergiround tmiik, In canopy are affected by the expropriation I ho~ (vv 2 358 1 station may not require resettlement howvCmt ;h, affected parts require relocation into the _____ ________________ ________________________ ______________________________Linexpropriatenedroppited prf ohehello Lot No. 3884, a one story building hosting 5 shops, 3 are owned, in which one is vacant, and two are rented. Expropriation decree severely affects the building, resettlement is required. n~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lot No. Z358, A gas station with its canopy, pumps arid underground tanks are affected. Resettlemnent may not be requiired however relocation within lot is required, _ ;~~~~~~~~~~DOAJNTO _ g~~ ~~~~~~~~~~igue9 ~~~~~~~~~~POORPI ILUTRTO /~~~® \\;g, - s r - N X-:: _/I, / /I. __ .IST No. 1I) S. l \ l S BYI 1 F l l Is(i El) TI\ F1W P(OPIOSI I, EXPROPRIATION 1)1CR1EE ,A1 IIA\ YFk .IIUNCTI ON .. , i. ^ 1 843, 8 (IS 112 11 Lot is aiilThcted by za prc\ i(Mis dcecrce. 963 3~~~7(0 3(I 127 S Lot is alTectcd by a prnioios dicc, cc _ . X 573 I')X () 17 12 I I Lol is allcctcdi b\ .a l)ic\iOots dIcrcc. 7 45 973, 1 ' 73) .8) 127 '.18 I.ol is zi (I1ccted l\i pi )c% iotis ((cci cc. 4 1 )72 7(14 6I (1 . 8 _ 5 1073 9 *37_ () 4 . 1 074 891) 47 1) - 7 1 8O( I 'l I I ! 8 1(1( 13 2 2 167 0 13 9 109 I I (0)( 162 )16 10 (0)92 662 31 0 ( I I109) 4459 47 0) 1 2 11 25 7(04 1 0 ( 1 7 I I 1132 5 2 12 0) 7 166 - I- I 1 29 S 1w( ( 1 5 ')54 I12(10 1-1 1) - I ( 957 1 8( 0 - 7 17 95 I 12(1(1 1(1(I 0 -o 18 0( 1 1200 11 I . ) 1. 962 1200 III 0 - 9 20O 965 12(1(1 94 0 8 2 1 9( ;6 1 15(1 42 0-4 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2 1040 9(4 103 0 - 0 23 1 047 I 157 8 (2 7 24 1 2)0 1 199 77 (6 (, 25 1053 1 67( () - 26( I 06,4 I 1 96 44 () 4 27 1065 , 1 1() 5 ( (1.4 28 1 44 I 117 1 7 20) ( 2 Totals 38,355 3,834 1,I() 239 Notc: F\piopIJit(iol clccicc M0 Llis jtiIlCIiOII Is doj)Io0VCd LIST NO. 1OA STATUS OF EXPROPRIATED LOTS WITH BUILDINGS AT HAYEK JUNCTION Classification of the Expropriation 2 6 o Shops Residences _i 7i [Occupied occupied Explanation Rented Rented rU Owned a Squatters Vacant Owned 4 Squatters Vacant One story building hosting two shonws Ai rcnt,(l 1, ,1, 1 4 3 -1------1 and a clothing shop runi by thie owners of thrwk inanition to a vacant apartmient Resettleout illt required 2 38 1 A one story abandoned house Lot No. 43, a one story building hostirg two businesses, o bakery and a clothing shop- Resettlement is required. Lot No. 38, a one story voccnt building. HAYEK JUNCTION Figure-1Ob PHOTOGRAPHIC ILLUSTRATIOJ /~~ 1, - - r * -~~~~~~ -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ j : _ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _, _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ LIST No. II SFA I \ Ill; ()I I 1 I(IS A 121LC1 .) 1W I 1 11 I'OSI I) IO\ P 0P II l()N 1)1 K( '1t1.1KI AU \ [ XI IA.LLE'S .1 UN( C ION __ ~ ~~~ .- _ _ - _ ,_ _ _ - _ - ., _-__ _ >__ _ - _ -tIlIIIt I 2 1 I 6875 970 0 see comimilenits 14 CAiI olI). I)i I ips ,ii id iii(lei iiotid tmI 1 o0 ;I gn;s sI;II;i i 2 1 ~ ) 1052S 48 0 5 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2 12 3 23 -3 0 I 1 4 4 2 2 8 I 5 120 0 -1 5 Lot N%;IS JI' lecd I)\% p1e \iOIIS cNlp)rOp)HjtiOIi diccicc ' 19 ' 4 70 ' 6 173 3844 28 - 1I Lol \x;Is aliecied l) Ipc\iolis t\ploprl-iilionI dccr:cc 7 70 i I 13 863 102 0 I Lot 'iuis aliccccled l). pIVioIIS cxpropriionon (leiccrc 8 1 75 52 47 34 I. Lo0 \\t s ;IIItlcted h\ l)NC\iOIs C\I)10l1i;I .olj (ICCICC 7) )66 23 3 43 1 08 7 Lol 7wi ;ISTlcclcd b I pci OIIS Cp\lopr IatioI (ICCICC I0 666 1 282 54 0 4 i I 21 9( 173 1 I 0 ( 1 __ I'Tltis 163.6651 3,464 34 4) LIST NO. 11A STATUS OF EXPROPRIATED LOTS WITH BUILDINGS AT MKALLES JUNCTION Classification of the Expropriation o o Shops Residences Occupied | Occupied Explanation a) V) ~~Rented Rented Owned Rne Squatters Vacant Owned X j Squatters Ca A gas station with its pumps and uindetgrgiid im affected by the expropriation The gas nt,iii :. X l2911 - 1 - - - - require resettlement, however, it requires n v 1 it II I the pumps and tanks within the une-propiit- I of theltot Lot No. 21 1. hosting a gas station. Canopy, pumps and underground tanks are afiected, and could be moved within the unexprapriated section of the lot. MKALLES JUNCTION Figure-illb PHOTOGRAPHIC ILLUSThAT1IO A i: A ::: : N< --: ~~ A \, li)-X w: -- -lf h a I l)_ - - : - - l~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- LIS'r No. 12 s l \ I AIT' ()14 12 1i , II OS A.F14 L (E1 1) I'\' 1I I I, lol'OOS F I; E1N XP()R V RI AloN I)C ( EE 1R 1: AT1 1 CII IOUJN - ARAM1UIOIN JIllN(CIION -) _j < o _ _ _ i -7 -- - IJ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Xi Commentsf X I 2-3 5 9977 0 0 433 7 Lot is affecteld b i ippro\ed dec2iee Btli cl gis p;I I \ iiji Is(0 _ ~ ~~~~~~_________ .t.. ublie doiu;ai ii 2 479 4 191 647 647 - I 5 Lot was tfflbcted b! previous decree. 3 I13 S 756 63 0 8 Lot was aflected b\ prlc ioals dcciec. 4 95(0 1 592 107 0 see comment 7 C(;lllop\. pilinllIp and unidolgl(linI1td ll or U1 ". . 3 6 65 * 4RO C O . Lot was atfecied b) pro ious dcccre 6Gj 977 452SS S 10 0 I2 {Lot was alfected ) piev\ iois dcciee. 7 3 S94 322002 738 O 3 Lot wts altcced b!N piciotis decrec. Totals 90,2863 2,573 647 433 LIST NO. 12A STATUS OF EXPROPRIATED LOTS WITH BUILDINGS AT BCHAMOUN - ARAMOUN JUNCTION _ Classification of the Expropriation z _i Shops Residences t: Xci Occupied OOccupied Explanation a) e) Rented Rented -O Vacant Vcn v Owned ~ . Squatters Owned Squatters A gas station with its pumps, uLdergrotino t,im- ir* t canopy are affected by the expropriatioii T li-e l 950 1 station may not require resettlement, nVf*t affected parts require relocation into the unexpropriated part of the lot A three story building, mostly buLilt on pu IhN doni io i hosting an aluminum workshop in the basinmentin fin 2 1235 1 1 2 a bakery and an apartment on the grounrd floot ]nid . semi-finished apartment on the first floor I he hw)dwn is severely affected by the expropriation .ondvidI _ ____ _________ _________ _________ ________ ________ _________ _________ ________ require resettlem ent Lot No. 1235. hosting o three story building which includes an aluminum workshop in the basement, a bokery and an apartment on the ground floor and semi-finished apartment on the first floor. The building is partly built within puiblic domain. Lot No. 950 hosting a gas station and an apartment in the bock. The canopy, pumps and underground tanks of tie !5tation are affected. BCHAMOUN ARAMOUN JUNCTI( Figure-1 2b PHOTOGRAPHIC ILLUSTRATIOI