E2964 v4 WATER SECTOR DEVELOPMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL IMPROVEMENTS PIU Environmental Management Plan Rehabilitation of Primary Canals of Low-Hrazdan Irrigation Scheme: Low Hrazdan 1st Stage Canal, Low Hrazdan 2nd Stage Canal Shah Aru Canal 30 September 2008 Revised – 9 August 2011 WSDII PIU 75/44 Baghramyan Street Yerevan 0033, Armenia Tel +374 10 277943 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals Contents Glossary 2 Executive Summary 3 1 Introduction 6 2 Project Description 7 3 Description of Existing Conditions 9 4 Environmental and Social Impacts 13 5 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures 14 6 Institutional Responsibilities, Reporting and Budget 16 6.1 Institutional Responsibilities 16 6.2 Reporting Format and Schedule 17 6.3 Budget 17 7. Public Consultations 17 8 Environmentally Sound Clauses for Civil Works Contracts 18 9 Main Findings 19 Annexes 21 Annex A: Environmental Management Plan: Mitigation Measures 21 Annex B: Monitoring Plan 27 Annex C: Incident Report Form 29 Annex D: Check List of Potential Environmental and Social Impacts 30 Annex E: Environmental and Environmental Clauses for Civil Works Contracts 43 Annex F: Minutes of Public Consultation Meetings 50 1 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals Glossary AMD Armenian Dram DM Distance Marker (or “Picket Number�) EA Environmental Assessment EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan Environmental Expertise State Environmental Expertise SNCO of the MNP ESHSP Environmental, Social and Health Safety Plan ESIO Environmental and Social Impact Officer, MCA-Armenia FS/FD Consultant Feasibility Study/Final Design Consultant GDP Gross Domestic Product GIS Geographic Information System GoA Government of Armenia ICID International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage ICOLD International Commission on Large Dams IE Implementing Entity Irrigation PIU Water Sector Development and Institutional Improvements PIU MCC Millennium Challenge Corporation MCA-Armenia Millennium Challenge Account - Armenia SNCO MNP Ministry of Nature Protection of the Republic of Armenia NEAP National Environmental Action Plan NGO Non-Governmental Organization PAP Project Affected Party RAP Resettlement Action Plan RA Republic of Armenia RRRP Rural Road Rehabilitation Project SCWS State Committee on Water Systems USD United States of America Dollars WB World Bank WSA Water Supply Agency WUA Water User Association 2 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals Executive Summary Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Irrigation Scheme is envisaged under the Additional Financing of the Irrigation Rehabilitation Emergency Project (IREP). Rehabilitation of this Irrigation Scheme was planned under the MCA-Armenia program. For this purposes Environmental Management Plan was prepared under the MCA-Armenia program, however because of the limited time and resources these rehabilitation works were not carried out under the MCA-Armenia program. This Environmental Management Plan (EMP) has been developed for the rehabilitation of the Low Hrazdan Main Canal, as a part of the comprehensive assignment under the Infrastructure Activity of the Irrigated Agriculture Project of MCA-Armenia. An overall objective of the EMP is to bring the project into compliance with the environmental and social requirements set by the legislation of the Republic of Armenia and environmental and social policies of the Millennium Challenge Corporation. The EMP links the mitigation measures into a comprehensive implementation scheme, designed to ensure action. It describes institutional responsibilities, compliance monitoring and reporting requirements, and cost for implementing the EMP, all in order to answer the “who?� “how?� and “how much?� questions. The Low Hrazdan Main Canal is one of the major irrigation systems of Armenia. The feasibility study and final design for the Low Hrazdan Main Canal was prepared by “Hayjrnakhagits� CJSC under the contract IA-06/003 for Design and Construction Supervision for Rehabilitation of Six Main Canals. The proposed project is expected to cover rehabilitation of: degraded structures of Low Hrazdan 1st Stage Canal - 1,203km, Low Hrazdan 2nd Stage Canal – 2,368km, and Shah Aru Canal – 1,712km, including monolithic concrete lining 12 cm thick, rehabilitation of existing and performance of new joints. The rehabilitation works are expected to start in fall 2011 and continue for two years, taking place during the irrigation off-season. The overall objective of the rehabilitation is to improve the technical state of the main canal in order to reduce seepage losses, restore the reliability of water command and delivery to irrigated lands, and, where feasible, and if water supplies are available, to expand irrigated lands. It is expected that the results of the canal rehabilitation program will be an increase in crop yield and in the incomes of the water users. Lower Hrazdan Irrigation Scheme is located in the Armavir Marz of the Republic of Armenia.. The water source is Hrazdan River. The system takes water 1.5 km downstream from head intake structure of Artashat main canal through an aquedact. The system also gets additional water from Sevjur River. The design area of agricultural lands under command of irrigation system is 10.8 ha, actually irrigated 5400ha. 3 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals The system consists of 50.2 km long Low Hrazdan 1st and 2nd Stage Canals (accordingly: 28,3 km and 21,9 km) and 9.3 km long Shah Aru canal. The irrigation network of the system covers pre-mountain regions of the north-western part of Ararat Plain. About 15,900 households within irrigation systems under command area are considered project beneficiaries. There are 30 beneficiary communities whose lands are located within the sections of canals subject to rehabilitation. The irrigation systems supplied from the main canal are serviced by the “Vagharshapat� and “Khoy� WUAs. The design discharge at the main canal head structure is 10.02 m3/sec, stage II - 7.3 m3/sec and Shah Aru canal - 2.0 m3/sec. The current annual demand for irrigation water amounts to 90.0 mln.m3, and the future cadastral demand – 131.6 mln.m3. The following problems were identified during investigations:  Most of the stage I and stage II of main canal is lined with monolithic concrete, pre-cast concrete slabs, L-shaped r/c blocks. Some of the lined sections of canals have been recently rehabilitated under World Bank project.  Most of canal lining has been deteriorated and L-slabs have been deformed due to long operation, climatic conditions, erosion by water and anthropogenic factors, some sections have lost their vertical position causing reduction of discharge capacity and considerable seepage losses. Hydraulic structures located on canals are in poor technical state, and some structures are even in emergency state. All structures of Low Hrazdan 1st and 2nd staged canals, and Shah Aru canal were rehabilitated under the MCA-Armenis program. This project addresses to rehabilitate 3.568km of Low Hrazdan canals (Low Hrazdan 1st Stage Canal - 1,203km, Low Hrazdan 2nd Stage Canal – 2,368km), which will result in saving 7.6mln.m3 of irrigation water, and 1.06km of Shah Aru canal, which will result in saving 0.848mln.m3 of irrigation water. The main crops within the command areas of irrigation system are grape, fruits, vegetables, wheat, potato and perennial fogger. The proposed rehabilitation works will have insignificant, short-term and localized environmental impacts during implementation of rehabilitation works and further operation and maintenance of the canals. The impacts during the implementation period are expected to be mainly caused by the need for removal of degraded concrete slabs lining canals under rehabilitation; removal of regulating structures; upgrading of service roads; and earthworks as required. All debris, spillage and construction waste, including silt taken from canals must be properly removed and disposed of at approved landfills/dump sites that do not encroach upon areas inhabited by local residents. Earth borrowing and mining of local aggregates and spoils disposal sites will have a temporary negative impact on the 4 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals environment. Clearing of vegetation and excavations may also take place for some parts of the access roads. Base camps with storage of oil, chemicals and other pollutants will be removed. Following rehabilitation, canal embankments will be planted with ground cover and steep slopes strengthened with vegetation, grass and plants or gabions. Dust and smoke arising from construction machines can have negative impact on the ambient air quality. Such effects are expected to be minimal and transient. During operation negative environmental impacts will be less apparent, but might result from inadequate attention to removal of silt debris and waste from canal beds during routine maintenance. Leakage from canals will be monitored to prevent excess soil saturation and water logging. Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan 1st and 2nd Stage and Shah-Aru Canals will bring positive changes to delivery of irrigation water, and water users will more easily obtain the required quantity of irrigation water in a timely manner. Greater water use efficiency can lead to increased levels of agricultural productivity, including more water for landholders at the end of the canal delivery system. Rehabilitation can lead to the adoption of higher value cropping patterns, as well as the extension of irrigated land holdings thereby increasing food security. As a result of rehabilitation of the canals the water resource will be more effectively managed. Site investigations suggest that there are some areas where rural inhabitants have encroached on lands adjacent to the canals. Where construction or operation of the project result in a loss of assets or access to assets (temporarily or permanently), the project affected people (PAPs) will be compensated in accordance with the World Bank’s Operational Policy on Involuntary Resettlement (OP 4.12). A Resettlement Action Plan will be developed consistent with the Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) and will be implemented prior to construction in the affected areas to ensure proper compensation to the affected people. This EMP provides for a list of measures designed to mitigate the likely negative environmental and social impacts as well as enhancement measures to strengthen the positive impacts. These measures were designed with due consideration of public concerns that were obtained in the process of informal and formal consultations with the public to be affected by the project. A set of environmentally and socially sound clauses for civil works contracts is incorporated in the Technical Specifications for the Low Hrazdan I/S canals and are included in Annex E. 5 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals 1 Introduction Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Irrigation Scheme is envisaged under the Additional Financing of the Irrigation Rehabilitation Emergency Project (IREP).. Rehabilitation of this Irrigation Scheme was planned under the MCA-Armenia program. For this purposes Environmental Management Plan was prepared under the MCA-Armenia program, however because of the limited time and resources these rehabilitation works were not carried out under the MCA-Armenia program. Currently the WB considers Additional Financing to IREP to address rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan 1st Stage, Low Hrazdan 2nd Stage, and Shah Aru Canals. Taking into account that EMP prepared under the MCA-Armenia program for Low Hrazdan Irrigation Scheme fully covers the stretches to be rehabilitated on Low Hrazdan 1st Stage, 2nd Stage and Shah Aru Canals., the EMP is applicable for rehabilitation of above mentioned canals. The Low Hrazdan Main Canal is one of the major irrigation systems of Armenia. The feasibility study and final design for the Low Hrazdan Main Canal was prepared by “Hayjrnakhagits� CJSC under the contract IA-06/003 for Design and Construction Supervision for Rehabilitation of Six Main Canals. The proposed project is expected to cover rehabilitation of: degraded structures of Low Hrazdan 1st Stage Canal - 1,203km, Low Hrazdan 2nd Stage Canal – 2,368km Shah Aru Canal – 1,712km, including monolithic concrete lining 12 cm thick, rehabilitation of existing and performance of new joints. The rehabilitation works are expected to start in fall 2011 and continue for two years, taking place during the irrigation off-season. Lower Hrazdan irrigation system is located in the Armavir Marz of the Republic of Armenia. The water source is Hrazdan River. The system takes water 1.5 km downstream from head intake structure of Artashat main canal through an aquedact. The system also gets additional water from Sevjur River. The design area of agricultural lands under command of irrigation system is 10.8 ha, actually irrigated 5400ha. The system consists of 50.2 km long Low Hrazdan 1st and 2nd stages canals and 8,788 km long Shah Aru canal. The irrigation network of the system covers pre-mountain regions of the north-western part of Ararat Plain. About 15,900 households within irrigation system’s under command area are considered project beneficiaries. There are 30 beneficiary communities whose lands are located within the sections of canals subject to rehabilitation. The design discharge at the main canal head structure is 10.02 m3/sec, stage II - 7.3 m3/sec and Shah Aru canal - 2.0 m3/sec. 6 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals The current annual demand for irrigation water amounts to 90.0 mln.m3, and the future cadastral demand – 131.6 mln.m3. The main crops within the command areas of irrigation system are grape, fruits, vegetables, wheat, potato and perennial fogger. The following problems were identified during investigations:  Most of the stage I and stage II of main canal is lined with monolithic concrete, pre-cast concrete slabs, L-shaped r/c blocks. Some of the lined sections of canals have been recently rehabilitated under World Bank project.  Most of canal lining has been deteriorated and L-slabs have been deformed due to long operation, climatic conditions, erosion by water and anthropogenic factors, some sections have lost their vertical position causing reduction of discharge capacity and considerable seepage losses. Hydraulic structures located on canals are in poor technical state, and some structures are even in emergency state. All structures of Low Hrazdan 1st and 2nd staged canals, and Shah Aru canal were rehabilitated under the MCA-Armenia program This project addresses to rehabilitate 3,568km of Low Hrazdan 1st and 2nd Stage Canals, canals, which will result in saving 7.6mln.m3 of irrigation water, and 1,267km of Shah Aru canal, which will result in saving 0.848mln.m3 of irrigation water. 2 Project Description This chapter was developed by using the baseline environmental and social data collected and provided by the FS/FD Consultant. The Low Hrazdan Main Canal is located in Armavir and Yerevan Marzes of the Republic of Armenia. The system includes the piedmont and plain zones of Ararat Valley and spreads within an absolute altitude of about 840-960m. The canals included in the Low Hrazdan Irrigation Scheme and envisaged for rehabilitation by the project are (i) the Low Hrazdan 1st and 2nd Stage Canals, (ii) the Shah Aru Canal. The total length of the canal sections subject to rehabilitation is 5,283km (see Figure 1 and Table 1 below). (i) Low Hrazdan Main Canal starts at 1.5 kilometer of Artashat Main Canal (water source for Artashat Main Canal is the River Hrazdan) and stretches over 50 237 m. The specification for Phase I and Phase II canals is as follows:  Low Hrazdan Main Canal Phase I starts at 1.5 km of Artashat Main Canal; the canal is 28337 m long with a water release at the headwork of 10,02 m3/s; at DM 168+471 the canal gets additional water from Arevshat pumping station 7 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals by 4.0 m3/sec. The total length of the canal sections subject to rehabilitation is 1 203 m.  Low Hrazdan Main Canal Phase II starts at the end of Low Hrazdan Main Canal Phase I, at DM 283+37. Water release at the headwork is 7.3m3/s and the total length of the canal sections subject to rehabilitation is 3 568 m. 24 communities have their irrigated lands within the command area of the Low Hrazdan Main Canal (12 communities within the command area of the 1st Stage and 12 communities within the command area of the 2nd Stage). The first 18 km of the canal passes through Yerevan city area and the remaining 32 km through Armavir Marz. The whole canal passes through rectangular and table-like cross-sections. Figure1: Map of Low Hrazdan Main Canal (ii) Shah Aru Canal starts at the end of Low Hrazdan Main Canal Phase I at DM 283+37. The canal is 9.3km long and the water release at the headwork is 2 m3/s. The whole canal passes through rectangular and table-like cross-sections and through soil bed at the last section. The total length of the canal sections subject to rehabilitation is 1 712m. Six communities have their irrigated lands within the command area of the canal. A summary of the proposed rehabilitation works of the Low Hrazdan I/S is presented in Table 1. 8 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals Table 1. Overview of sections and hydraulic structures of Low Hrazdan Main Canal subject to rehabilitation Canal Length (in Siphon Aqueduct Outlet Storm Bridges Other name m) piece/ piece/ piece/meter water structures of canal meter meter diverting (backwater) sections structures proposed for rehabilitation Low 1,203 - - - - - - Hrazdan Phase I Low 2,368 - - - - - - Hrazdan Phase II Shah Aru 1,712 - - - - - - Canal Total 5,283 3 Description of Existing Conditions Climate The climate of the area of Low Hrazdan Main Canal is severely continental with dry and hot summers and medium cold winters with unstable snow-cover. The continental climate is conditioned by dry overheated air mass blowing from the south in summer, and the invasion of cold air masses from the north in winter, that further on get colder in anti- cyclonic weather conditions. During summer the average temperature is +23o C and the maximum reaches up to 38o C (in 1999-2001 the maximum temperature reached up to 42o C). The average temperature in winter varies between -10o C to -12o C, and the absolute minimum temperature of -30o C is observed in January. The annual precipitation varies between 290-350 mm. The greatest part of precipitation falls during spring months. Air relative humidity varies within the ranges of 49 % - 53 % in summer, 73 % - 76 % in winter, 57% - 61 % in spring and 51 % - 70 % in autumn. Geological-engineering conditions The project area is situated in Yerevan and Armavir Marzes. Both Marzes are situated in the semi-desert zone. The geological structure of the project area of Low Hrazdan Main Canal is predominantly stipulated by the alluvial-terrace and effusive-volcanic formations. In some areas andesine effusive (lava flows), intensely weathered and fissured show on the surface. 9 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals The geological-engineering conditions of the project area are characterized by 7 engineering geological elements (layers). These have been identified by the FS/FD Consultant as a result of review of available materials and topographic and field geophysical surveys. The summary description of these layers is the following: Layer №1 (dlQIV) Topsoil of sandy loam content with up to 15% inclusion of rock debris. Thickness 0.1-0.3 m. Layer №2 (alQIV) Top soil of alluvial origin of gravely-pebble content with up to 25% of sand matrix. Thickness up to 2.0 - 4.0 m. Layer №2a (alQIV) Fine dusty sand with up to 20% inclusion of gravel. Thickness 1.8-3.2 m. Layer №3 (dlQIV) Loam soil of diluvial origin with up to 20-25% inclusion of small rock debris. Thickness 1.5-3.0 m. Layer №4 (dlQIV) Rock debris and coarse sand of diluvial origin with up to 30- 40% loam matrix. Thickness 3.0-5.0 m. Layer №5 (el-dlQIV) Large rock debris of eluvial origin with up to 30% sandy loam matrix. Thickness 2.0-4.0 m. Intensively fissured and weathered andesite-basalt tuff. Quaternary age. Thickness 50-100 m. Seismicity According to the Republic of Armenia map on seismic zoning2, the project area is located in seismic zone III, with 0.4g acceleration and 9-point a-seismic stability. Hydrology The water sources for the Low Hrazdan Main Canal system are the Rivers Hrazdan and Metsamor. The River Hrazdan is the left-side tributary of the River Araks and starts from Lake Sevan, its length is 141 km and the drainage area of the basin is 2,560 km 2. It flows from northeast to southwest, chiefly in a deep canyon. After Yerevan City it enters Ararat Valley and flows into the River Araks at an elevation of 820 m. The length of the river at the water intake section is 98 km and the drainage area of the basin is 1870 km2. Numerous hydro technical constructions are situated on the river and the flow is regulated by the water outlets from Lake Sevan. Apart from its main feeding source, the River Hrazdan (10.2 m3/s), the Low Hrazdan Canal gets additional water from Arevshat pumping station (4.0 m3/s) that is located at the end of the Sevjur Left-side Canal. The Sevjur Left-side Canal (with a discharge at the header of 9.6 m3/s) gets water from the River Metsamor. The River Metsamor is a left-side tributary of the River Araks that originates from the marshlands of Lake Metsamor, and feeds from water flows of Aknalitch and other underground waters. The water flow at the section of the water intake point is stable and regular. The length of the river is 98 km and the drainage area of the basin is 480 km2 (without tributaries). It has two major tributaries: the Rivers Selav- 10 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals Mastara and Kasakh. The header water intake structure of the Left-side canal provides water to Right-side canal and access canal of Sevjur-Akhtamar pumping station. No over-humidity phenomena have been observed in the project area, the underground water levels are situated at a depth of 5 - 15m. Biological diversity Flora Natural landscape of the project region is the habitat for numerous representatives of flora and fauna. Diversity of natural landscapes allows for the existence of various natural ecosystems with rich biodiversity. Natural flora comprises about 900 species of vascular plants. 15 of them are registered in the Red Book of the RA, among which one endemic type is registered in the Red list of the International Union of Nature Protection (IUNP). Fauna The fauna of the Project impact area including Yerevan, through which the upstream part of the canals passes, is also rather diverse. 25 species of mammals are found in the city, three of which are registered in the Red Book of the RA and five - in the Red List of IUNP. There also are harmful rodents, particularly black and gray rats and mice in the city area. Ornithofauna comprises about 170 bird species 29 of which are registered in the Red Book of the RA. At least 100 species build nests, 15 of which are registered in the Red Book of the RA. Other species appear periodically during seasonal migration and breeding periods. Natural synanthropic species are also widely spread. Among them sparrow, gray crow, magpie, rock pigeon (also wild species) and turtle-dove in the last few years have become more numerous. Among reptiles 25 species are spread and 5 of them are registered in the Red Book of Armenia. Four amphibian species are found in the project area. A great number of invertebrates are spread in the project area. Bugs are amongst the most investigated species. 700 species are known, some of which are considered endemic in Yerevan and Armenia. Among the insects there are 60 double-winged, 40 membranous winged, 130 butterflies, from 10 to 20 species of orthopterous, similar winged, spiders, molluscs, about 30 species of scutums and ticks. Specially protected areas Among the canals to be rehabilitated, only the Sevjur Left-side Canal is in the vicinity of Sevjur (Lake Ayghr) specially protected area. Intensive construction works will, however, start downstream the canal at 4 km distance from the reserve. Thus the rehabilitation works envisaged by the project will have no impact on the biodiversity of the area. 11 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals Soils and land use The lands of the project area are mainly located in the administrative area of Yerevan city and Armavir Marz. As to land-survey evaluation on agricultural land types, the project areas of Low Hrazdan Main Canal – i.e. the south-western part of Yerevan city and the eastern part of Armavir Marz – are included in “Merdzaraksyan� area. As to fertile land zones and soil types it is included in semi-desert zone, where semi-desert brown soils and meadow-black soils are typical. Semi-desert brown soils are specified by a small thickness of humus layer (25-40 cm) and low humus content (up to 2%). This type of soil has an average alkaline reaction (pH 7.7 - 8.2), low absorption properties (20 – 30 mg/eq), insufficient water-physical properties and is saturated by alkaline-earth alkalies. Meadow-black soils are specified by an average thickness of humus layer (30-50 cm), low humus content (1.5-2%) and a carbonate content of 3-7%. They have a strong alkaline reaction (pH<8.2-8.5), low absorption properties (30 – 40 mg/eq) and sufficient water- physical properties. No over-humid areas and soil salinization processes were observed in the project area of Low Hrazdan and Shah Aru. The underground water levels are situated within 5m to 15m depth. Lands under the command area of the Sevjur Left-side Canal are also not salinized but the groundwater level is quite high (at 1.0 m below the surface). There is a potential risk in increase of groundwater level, over-humidity of the area and soil salinization in case the canal is not rehabilitated, water losses are not prevented and irrigation norms are not maintained. Erosion No significant soil erosion has been observed in the project area. Partial erosion occurs mainly in and along roads and during the construction works of other economic units, as the proposed area is considered one of the most active economic regions of the RA. Besides, the project area is plain and there are no seasonal mudflow conduits. The bed of the River Khasakh is the only functioning one, the banks are strengthened with soil dams or gabions, so even in case of mudflows there is no bed and bank erosion. The project area is one of the most active agricultural regions in Armenia with almost all land under cultivation thus minimizing soil erosion phenomena. Sedimentation As canal feeding is realized through water intake structures and pumping stations, where great amounts of sediments are accumulated, sedimentation is weakly observed in the canals. Sediments are cleaned and carried away by the operating agencies before the 12 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals beginning of the vegetation season using mechanical methods. That is why water intake and inlet structures, pumping stations are not damaged in lower sections. Social conditions About 15,900 households within irrigation systems under command area are considered project beneficiaries. There are 24 beneficiary communities whose lands are located within the sections of canals subject to rehabilitation. According to the social surveys conducted by the FS/FD Consultant at the preliminary design phase, the irrigation water from the canals is managed by “Vagharshapat� and “Khoy�WUAs, the design area of agricultural lands under command of irrigation system is 10.8 ha, actually irrigated – 5.4ha. The following table presents some data on benefit from the project. Rehabilitated canals Number of Total % of water Men Women water users population users Low-Hrazdan 1st 9,752 22,942 42.5% 11,150 11,792 and 2nd stage canals Shah Aru canal 1,173 2,174 53.9% 1,047 1,127 4 Environmental and Social Impacts Only rehabilitation works on existing canals are to be carried out. Due to its rehabilitation nature, the proposed project is not likely to cause significant negative environmental and/or social impacts. Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan 1st and 2nd Stage, and Shah Aru Canals will bring positive changes to delivery of irrigation water, and water users will more easily obtain the required quantity of irrigation water in a timely manner. This should promote both increases in food security and incomes from agriculture, thereby reducing the number of poor population and mitigating out-migration in the area. These outcomes will be especially remarkable in the communities located at the tail-end sections of the Main Canal as their lands will become fully irrigable. The cumulative impacts expected as a result of rehabilitation of the canals will be more effective management of irrigation water resources by reducing water losses and enhancing the more effective water distribution between the users, as well as adoption of more efficient on-farm water management practices. Overall positive impacts from the rehabilitation effort are long-term and cumulative in their nature, ultimately contributing to the increased social benefits of the communities affected. Short-term social adverse impacts may occur only in cases when cutting plants and/or demolishment of light structures appearing within the alienation zone of the main canal cannot be avoided. It is expected that within the proposed project such adverse impact will be avoided through application of appropriate construction techniques. However, if conduct of construction works is not possible without cleaning of the alienation zone from 13 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals cultivated plants and/or structures Resettlement Action Plan must be developed in accordance with the Word Bank’s operational Policy on Involuntary Resettlement (OP 4.12). A Resettlement Action Plan will be developed on a basis of the Resettlement Policy Framework (RFP) prepared under the MCA-Armenia Program. The likely negative environmental and social impacts of the construction phase are expected to be localized and short-term. As a result of timely and proper implementation of this Environmental Management Plan with practical implementation of mitigation measures presented in Annex A to this report, all identified potential negative impacts can be prevented and minimized. In addition to this, regular monitoring over the civil works, in accordance with the Monitoring Plan, will ensure effective implementation of mitigation measures included in EMP. A possible negative environmental impact of the operation phase may be an increased use of agrochemicals in the areas of the project coverage, provided that with improved access to irrigation, farmers opt to increase volume of high value crops grown in their fields and apply increased amount of pesticides. This can be mitigated by carrying out a public information campaign on the optimal use of pesticides and extending some elements of the integrated pest management (IPM) relevant in the current country contest. 5 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures The mitigation measures are proposed for design, construction and operation phases of the rehabilitation of the Low Hrazdan Low Hrazdan 1st and 2nd Stage, and Shah Aru Canals that shall be undertaken by executing agencies to prevent and/or minimize the likely adverse impacts listed above. Design phase Environmental mitigation requirements shall be incorporated into final design, technical specifications and bidding documents, to be implemented by the construction contractor to avoid, prevent, minimize, or rehabilitate the potential impacts. The final design documents package shall include a list of approved borrow pits and agreed spoil disposal sites; permits, agreements obtained from the relevant local/regional authorities for use of borrow pits and sites for disposal of wastes as appropriate; list of construction preparation temporary sites such as access roads, construction camps, transport and machinery sites, storage facilities, etc. The final design documents shall also provide, to the extent possible, such technical approaches and solutions to the rehabilitation of separate stretches of the main canals where encroachments of the alienation zone are observed that do not require demolition of temporary and permanent private properties (structures, fences, poles, fruit trees, etc). In case the demolition (including tree cutting) or dislocation of private/state holdings is required for the rehabilitation works, a resettlement action plan (RAP) shall be prepared based on the existing RPF and in agreement with the guiding principles of the WB OP 4.12. Compensation will then be provided to the affected population according to RAP. 14 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals Construction Phase Measures to prevent and/or minimize the degradation of landscapes and soil erosion, pollution of surface and groundwater resources and soils by construction run-off should be implemented by the contractor during the construction phase. Measures to prevent and/or minimize the degradation of landscapes and soil erosion, pollution of surface and groundwater resources and soils by construction run-off should be implemented by the contractor during the construction phase. This may include, but may not be limited to:  the use of already existing quarries and disposal sites, according to the requirements set in the appropriate permits and agreements obtained at the design phase;  zones of preliminary accumulation of wastes that will cause no damage to the vegetation cover and other components of the environment should be maintained by the contractor;  all vegetative cover should be restored to its original condition;  sites for storage of oil and chemicals should be properly equipped to minimize the risks of polluting soils and waters;  dust and noise from the construction site should be minimized, especially in resident areas, public places, near schools, etc. If historical and/or cultural monuments or artefacts are unexpectedly found during earthworks, the construction contractors must cease the works and provide relevant information to the State Agency for Protection of Historical and Cultural Monuments which, after due consideration of the findings, shall recommend whether the works can be continued or the design must be revised. Operational Phase During operation it is essential that canal beds be periodically maintained to ensure proper conveyance, to avoid stagnation, to prevent flooding and damages caused by frost. The detailed mitigation measures to be undertaken by the executing agencies are presented in Annex A to this document. The following enhancement measures are proposed to strengthen the positive impacts expected as a result of rehabilitation of the Mkhchyan and Dvin Canals:  Involve the local population in project related activities (e.g. work force during construction phase, etc.)  Increase local water users’ knowledge on more efficient water management through providing training and practice, on-farm water management, higher value agricultural production, etc.  Raise awareness of integrated pest management and sound application of pesticides among water users;  Build capacity of local water users through provision of credits;  Support the institutional strengthening of the water supply and delivery organizations (Water Supply Agencies and Water Users Associations). 15 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals 6 Institutional Responsibilities, Reporting and Budget 6.1 Institutional Responsibilities Institutional responsibility for implementation of the proposed mitigation measures will be shared amongst the following agencies: Executing agencies Executing Agencies are responsible for executing the measures of the EMP. During the design phase, the executing agency, FS/FD Consultant (“Hayjrnakhagits Institute� CJSC) shall ensure that all the necessary permits and agreements (e.g. permits for the disposal of excavated materials, wastes, and demolition debris, etc.) are obtained from relevant state and local authorities before the construction works are tendered out. Executing agencies during construction phase (Construction contractors) shall take the responsibility for physical implementation of mitigation measures provided under the EMP, as well as for obtaining all permits and agreements related to construction activities (e.g. agreement with Historic and Cultural Monuments Protection Agency if any new historical/cultural/archaeological monument or artifacts are unexpectedly found during civil works) in accordance with the WB Environmental Policies and applicable environmental and social legislation of the Republic of Armenia. WUAs will be responsible for conducting awareness campaign among their members on integrated pest management and sound application of pesticides, using printed material and other training aids provided by PIU. Supervising agencies Supervising Agencies are responsible for supervising the executing agencies to ensure that they execute the mitigation measures as planned. The Construction Supervision Company hired by PIU for daily supervision over the implementation of civil works will be responsible for supervising the timely, proper and reliable implementation of works and measures as provided by the EMP (including oversight over the environmental and social aspects of all activities implemented under the project in order to ensure that mitigation measures are designed and implemented properly to prevent and minimize likely adverse environmental and social impacts). The supervising agencies will also ensure that all necessary agreements and permits are obtained by the appropriate contractors from relevant state and local authorities before the construction works are tendered out. The WB may request to check if such permits are issued and valid (e.g., not expired) as well as if the EMP mitigation and monitoring aspects are implemented on the ground during the canal rehabilitation phases according to the WB Environmental Policies and applicable Armenian environmental and social legislation. Monitoring agencies Monitoring agencies are in charge of monitoring the extent of implementation and the effectiveness of the mitigation and enhancement measures and of adjusting the program if needed. Monitoring agencies will be responsible for covering all measures requiring some sort of monitoring by PIU/WB. 16 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals The government entities, in particular the Ministry of Nature Protection and its affiliated agencies (State Environmental Inspectorate etc.), the Ministry of Health (State Hygienic Anti-Epidemiologic Inspectorate) and the Ministry of Culture (Historic and Cultural Monuments Protection Agency) may also be involved in the monitoring activities, as a part of their mandate. 6.2 Reporting Format and Schedule The Construction Supervision Company, working in cooperation with the Construction Contractor, will be responsible for reporting to PIU on the implementation of the mitigation measures included in Annex A and according to the monitoring plan presented in Annex B. The Incident Report Form shall be completed and submitted to PIU if any major environmental and social occurrences are observed (such as spills, explosions, etc.). The Incident form is presented in Annex C. 6.3 Budget The budget for civil works contracts includes costs allocated for implementation of environmental and social mitigation measures. Appropriate mitigation measures to be fulfilled by the construction contractor are presented in Annex A. The rates of EMP measures are estimated mainly on the basis of quantities of dismantling/removing of r/c slabs and cleaning/removing of canal sediments provided in BOQs. The distance of removal is agreed with local authorities. The difference in rates comes from the quantity of r/c slabs and sediments and the removal distance. There are very few slabs on canals of Lower Hrazdan irrigation scheme. Mainly sediments have to be cleaned from these canals and removed. Therefore EMP measures constitute 1,18% of total contract price. 7. Public Consultations According to FS/FD Consultant’s the area affected by the rehabilitation works of the Low Hrazdan 1st and 2nd Stage Canals covers 24 communities (Hakhtanak, Merdzavan, Baghramyan, Norakert, Shahumyan, Etchmiadzin Mughan, Aygeshat, Aygek, Zvartnots, Dasht - 1st Stage Canal; Samaghar, Haytagh, Arshaluys, Aragats, Amberd, Lernamerdz, Aknalich, Hotvamedj, Tsakhkalanj, Ferik, Aghavnatun, - 2nd Stage Canal), and Shah Aru canal covers 3 communities (Mrgastan, Tsakhkunk, Artimet). Two communintiees may undergo adverse impacts from rehabilitation of Lower Hrazdan main and Shah Aru canals – Shahumyan and Aragats. Positive impacts will occur not only in the remaining 25 communities but also in the aforementioned 2 communities that are possibly exposed to adverse impacts Two villages (Shahumyan and Aragats) were selected from 40% of communities as those that may undergo adverse impact. Three village (Baghramyan, Aghavnatun, and Mrgastan) 17 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals were selected from 15% of villages as communities that will undergo positive impact. Present EMP was disclosed in-country through the web page of MCC and through the administrations of WUAs servicing all of the 24 affected communities. Five communities were selected for public consultation: - Shahumyan, Baghramyan, Aragats, Aghavnatun, and Mrgastan. On June, 2011, public consultations were held in Shahumyan, Baghramyan, Aragats, Aghavnatun, and Mrgastan villages in relation to the rehabilitation project. The consultations involved representatives from WSDII PIU: H. Harutunyan – PIU Irrigation Officer, N.Atayan - Environmental and Social Impact Officer, V. Movsisyan – Institutional Improvements Officer, “Vagharshapat� and “Khoy� WUAs, community leaders and farmers. A record was kept of the participants through a signature on an attendance paper. The list of participants is attached in the Minutes of Meetings of the Public Consultations. The consultations aimed at discussing environmental and social issues related to Lower Hrazdan I & II Stage and Shah Aru canals rehabilitation project. The meetings were organized with the presentation and the discussion of the overall description of the activities to be implemented within the scope of the WSDP PIU Project, the details of the proposed rehabilitation activities, potential negative impacts, and envisaged mitigation measures, importance of the project activities for the local people, the expected outcomes and other issues. Participants in all the communities mentioned as significant the proposed project for Lower Hrazdan I & II stage and Shah Aru canals rehabilitation. The participants asked to implement rehabilitation activities within non-vegetative season not to hinder irrigation works. The participants mentioned the importance of the quality of the activities to be implemented in general. They asked to perform all the works of a high quality standard. The participants’ questions were about possibility for local population to be involved in the construction works. The questions presented received exhaustive answers by the PIU representatives, who explained that this Project is also aimed on reduction of poverty in rural regions and improving the social conditions by involvement of local population in construction works implemented in the scope of this Project. The environmental and social issues presented by the people concerned and the mitigation measures relating to those issues have been included in Environmental Management Plans. 8 Environmentally Sound Clauses for Civil Works Contracts Most construction phase impacts will be mitigated by including appropriate clauses into the civil works contracts. These clauses are included in Annex E. 18 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals 9 Main Findings The rehabilitation of the Low Hrazdan 1sit & 2nd Stage and Shah-Aru Canals is aimed at improving the deteriorated sections of the main canals of the system, which will reduce large water losses within the system and allow reliable irrigation of more lands. This will increase the agricultural production in rural areas of the Republic of Armenia and contribute to increased food security and reduced poverty. No new construction will be implemented under the Low Hrazdan 1sit & 2nd Stage and Shah-Aru Canals. The project mostly envisages rehabilitation of existing structures, which will have minor, short-term and localized environmental impacts during the construction phase. This EMP elaborates a list of measures (see Annex A) to be undertaken to mitigate likely environmental and social impacts that can occur during the various phases of the Low Hrazdan 1sit & 2nd Stage and Shah-Aru Canals rehabilitation – design, construction and further maintenance. The implementation of these measures will be monitored by the appropriate agencies and in accordance with the monitoring plan included in Annex B. The positive socio-economic and environmental effects of the project outweigh the likely environmental risks associated with its implementation. Accompanied by the training and capacity building program provided by the Water-to-Market activity of the MCA-Armenia program, the rehabilitation of the Low Hrazdan Main Canal will ensure greater water use efficiency, leading to increased levels of agricultural productivity, including more water for landholders at the end of the canal delivery system. This can also lead to the adoption of higher value cropping patterns, as well as the extension of irrigated land holdings thereby increasing food security. 19 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals Annexes Annex A: Environmental Management Plan: Mitigation Measures COST POTENTIAL NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MITIGATION OR EXECUTING SUPERVISING TIMING IMPACT MONITORING MEASURES AGENCY AGENCY (To be quantified where possible) Design Phase Pollution of water and soil, Obtain appropriate permits and/or agreements for FS/FD PIU Part of the During design degradation of landscapes as disposal of excavated materials and construction contract with a result of improper disposal wastes, use of water resource and water systems, etc. Consultant the FS/FD of excavated materials and Consultant construction wastes Develop a list and specifications for construction FS/FD PIU Part of the During design temporary sites such as access roads, construction contract with camps, transport and machinery maintenance sites, Consultant the FS/FD storage facilities, etc. Consultant Temporary air pollution Develop the traffic management plan on canal service FS/FD PIU Part of the During design (dust) related to the roads to ensure smooth traffic flow and safety both for contract with transportation of workers, local traffic and population Consultant the FS/FD construction materials and Consultant truck traffic Landscape degradation and Develop measures to strengthen the steep slopes with FS/FD PIU Part of the During design soil erosion vegetation, grass and plants or gabions. Consider the contract with use of plant species characteristic for the landscape in Consultant the FS/FD the course of restoration of the vegetation cover. Consultant 21 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals COST POTENTIAL NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MITIGATION OR EXECUTING SUPERVISING TIMING IMPACT MONITORING MEASURES AGENCY AGENCY (To be quantified where possible) Develop efficient methods for disposal or backfilling FS/FD PIU Part of the During design of extracted soils. Sites without vegetative cover and Consultant contract with within the alienation zone or specifically designated the FS/FD by local areas shall be used for storing the excavated Consultant soils. Temporary or permanent Develop such technical approaches and solutions to FS/FD PIU Part of the During design taking of property or the construction of the system, which, to the extent Consultant contract with productive assets, including possible, allow implementation of construction works the FS/FD peoples’ access to such without demolition and dislocation of private and Consultant assets that appear within community properties. Any taking of property, the alienation zone that permanent or temporary, will be in compliance with hinder construction works WB OP4.12, the RPF and a RAP. If dislocation and/or demolition or temporary or FS/FD PIU Part of the During design permanent use of the assets is required for Consultant contract with implementation of the works, the compensation shall the FS/FD be envisaged for the affected people in compliance Consultant with WB OP4.12, the RPF and a RAP. FS/FD PIU Part of the During design, before Servitudes must be ensured for the temporary and Consultant contract with construction works permanent use of community and private lands (if the FS/FD start applicable). Consultant 22 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals COST POTENTIAL NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MITIGATION OR EXECUTING SUPERVISING TIMING IMPACT MONITORING MEASURES AGENCY AGENCY (To be quantified where possible) Construction Phase Pollution of water and soil, Removal of old cement linings and accumulated silt. Construction PIU through Part of the contract with During construction degradation of landscapes as a Contractor Construction Construction Contractor works result of improper disposal of Supervisor excavated materials and Maintain zones of preliminary accumulation of wastes Construction PIU through Part of the contract with During construction construction wastes that will cause no damage to the vegetation cover and Contractor Construction Construction Contractor works other components of the environment. Supervisor Arrange transport and disposal of wastes according to Construction PIU through Part of the contract with After obtaining of the established traffic management plan, procedure Contractor Construction Construction Contractor permit, during and in the approved dump sites designated for the Supervisor construction works specific purpose. Maintain appropriate operating rules for the camps in Construction PIU through Part of the contract with During construction identified suitable sites, including safe handling of Contractor Construction Construction Contractor works control of access, adequate drainage, etc. Supervisor Spillage of oil or toxic Implement the measures to control spillage of toxic Construction PIU through Part of the contract with During construction substances substances that will be included in construction contracts, Contractor Construction Construction Contractor works including: guidelines for the proper storage and sitting of Supervisor hazardous material such as oil, grease, fuel, asphalt, or ignitable and corrosive materials; lubricants will be collected in clearly marked containers and reused if possible, or disposed of at properly regulated offsite locations; water samples will be taken and tested for oil when there is a risk of spills or leakages to canal waters, surface waters, or groundwater. 23 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals COST POTENTIAL NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MITIGATION OR EXECUTING SUPERVISING TIMING IMPACT MONITORING MEASURES AGENCY AGENCY (To be quantified where possible) Temporary air pollution Use closed/covered trucks for transportation of Construction PIU through Part of the contract with During construction (dust) related to the construction materials and wastes. Depending on Contractor Construction Construction Contractor works transportation of season, wash truck tires as appropriate at the specially Supervisor construction materials and designed car washing sites to control tracking mud and truck traffic noise and dust onto paved roads. vibration disturbances Clean the surrounding area from dust by water sprinkling Construction PIU through Part of the contract with During construction (except in Winter), remove excess materials and clean the Contractor Construction Construction Contractor works sites upon completion of activities Supervisor Provide workers that deal with hazardous materials or Construction PIU through Part of the contract with During construction exposed to dust with necessary protection gear, and Contractor Construction Construction Contractor works follow applicable regulations and procedures as Supervisor established by GoA authorities. Terminate the works at the established time (e.g. work Construction PIU through Part of the contract with During construction in daylight time) and avoid increase of noise and Contractor Construction Construction Contractor works number of peak hours. Consult with local authorities Supervisor Impacts on safety of Workers during cement pouring and while using Construction PIU through Part of the contract with During construction personnel heavy equipment shall have and use safety equipment. Contractor Construction Construction Contractor works Supervisor 24 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals COST POTENTIAL NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MITIGATION OR EXECUTING SUPERVISING TIMING IMPACT MONITORING MEASURES AGENCY AGENCY (To be quantified where possible) Impacts on historic-cultural Cease the works as soon as historical and cultural Construction PIU through GoA funding if urgent During construction monuments or artifacts monuments or artifacts are encountered and Contractor Construction excavations are required works immediately provide relevant information to the State Supervisor Agency for Historical and Cultural Monuments Protection Landscape degradation and Arable land shall not be used as earth borrowing. If Construction PIU through Part of the contract with During construction soil erosion unavoidable the topsoil (about 30 cm) shall be Contractor Construction Construction Contractor works removed, kept at specifically designated sites and Supervisor refilled. Dump excavated soils and substances only within the Construction PIU through Part of the contract with During construction areas designated for that purpose. Contractor Construction Construction Contractor works Supervisor Restore landscape to quasi-original vegetation cover Construction PIU through Part of the contract with During construction after completion of rehabilitation works. Contractor Construction Construction Contractor works Supervisor Temporary or permanent If it is required to develop and implement the GoA through PIU GoA funding Before construction taking of property or Resettlement Action Plan, and/or obtain servitude, the relevant entity works start in the productive assets, including construction works will start after the compensations are particular section peoples’ access to such assets, paid to the project affected persons (PAPs) and servitudes acquired. These must be guided by the Armenian (including tree cutting) that legislation and WB guidelines. appear within the alienation zone that hinder construction works If demolition and/or dislocation is required, the project GoA through PIU GoA funding Before construction affected persons will be compensated in accordance with relevant entity works start in the WB OP4.12 before the construction starts. particular section 25 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals COST POTENTIAL NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MITIGATION OR EXECUTING SUPERVISING TIMING IMPACT MONITORING MEASURES AGENCY AGENCY (To be quantified where possible) Operation Phase Hydrological issues of Maintain the water conduit and hydro-technical structures WSA, WUA SCWS Regular Operation and During operation flooding, low flow and water to minimize the risk for water stagnation and accidents. Maintenance cost stagnation Operate the water intakes in such a way that the water WSA, WUA SCWS Regular Operation and During operation withdrawal is properly controlled to avoid withdrawing Maintenance cost more water than allowed. Maintain the canal beds and hydraulic structures to avoid WSA, WUA SCWS Regular Operation and During operation water stagnation. Maintenance cost Regularly clean slit from the canals bed and dispose the WSA, WUA SCWS Regular Operation and During operation removed slit in the approved waste disposal sites. The Maintenance cost removed slit can be also applied in the farm-fields as a fertilizer. Negative impact on human Conduct of public awareness campaign and extension of PIU through SCWS Included in the project Although this impact is and environmental health as a applicable IPM technologies to water users pest procurement plan as expected during result of increased use of management procurement of operation, the mitigation pesticides in the areas with consultant, consulting services measure is proactive and improved irrigation WSA, WUA will be applied during operation Siltation in canals Training of WSA staff on proper operation and PIU/WSA SCWS Regular operation and During operation maintenance maintenance 26 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals Annex B: Monitoring Plan This monitoring plan will be used to determine compliance with the Environmental Management Plan (Annex A). Phase What parameter is to be Where is the parameter to How is the parameter to be When is the parameter to be Cost Reporting Agency monitored? be monitored? monitored?/ type of monitored? (frequency of monitoring equipment measurement or continuous) Material borrows and dumps At the design consultant Perspective borrows and During the design Minimal additional PIU dumps identified design cost Design Road accessibility to the At the design consultant Inspection During the design Minimal additional PIU structures design cost Soil erosion In new cutting areas and Inspections at site and During and after Minimal additional PIU through slopes soils mechanical construction work, when construction cost Construction Construction information deemed necessary Supervisor Water pollution In water bodies Inspection During construction Minimal additional PIU through works construction cost Construction Supervisor Air pollution/dust At working site Visual inspection During earth works, when Minimal additional PIU through deemed necessary construction cost Construction Supervisor Noise At working site Inspection of During earth works and Minimal additional PIU through blast, when deemed construction cost Construction noise levels (dB) necessary and on Supervisor complaint Conservation of vegetation At working site Inspection When cutting and Minimal additional PIU through resources restoring used areas construction cost Construction Supervisor 27 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals Phase What parameter is to be Where is the parameter to How is the parameter to be When is the parameter to be Cost Reporting Agency monitored? be monitored? monitored?/ type of monitored? (frequency of monitoring equipment measurement or continuous) Staff safety At work site Inspection Unannounced inspections Minimal additional PIU through during work construction cost Construction (protective equipment) Supervisor Overall workers’ camp site On the camp site during Inspection According to the existing Minimal additional PIU through conditions construction activities regulations construction cost Construction Supervisor Conduct of campaign for WUA offices and water Inspection After formal launch of the Minimal additional PIU rising awareness of IPM and user communities campaign cost to operational sound use of pesticides Survey budget of PIU Maintenance of irrigation On site Inspection Continuous – full scale Routine operation WSA, WUA delivery system desiltation required yearly and maintenance Operation cost Maintenance of irrigation On site Inspection When needed Routine operation WSA, WUA off-takes and other and maintenance structures cost 28 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals Annex C: Incident Report Form REHABILITATION OF LOW HRAZDAN I & II STAGE AND SHAH-ARU CANALS 1 Date: 2 Canal Section: 3 Location: 4 Construction Contractor: 5 Marz (Region): 6 Water Supply Agency/WUA 7 Incident Type: 8 Severity: High Medium Low 10 Reported By: 11 Description of Incident Root Cause: 12 Corrective Action Taken: 13 Corrective Action to be Taken: 14 Action Taken to Prevent Recurrence: 15 Corrective Action Carried Out By: 16 Close Out By: 17 Close Out Date: 18 Person Involved: 19 Machine Involved: 20 Contractor/Sub Contractor Involved: 21 Third Party Involvement: 22 Photo Reference – Attached: The photos with appropriate descriptions should be presented as an Attachment to the Incident Report For PIU use only Date Received by: Decision/Action made: 29 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals Annex D: Check List of Potential Environmental and Social Impacts Project Name/location: Low-Hrazdan I/S Canals Assessor’s name/position: CS Team Date(s) of Assessment: May-June 2011 Comments No impact likely Negative impact Negative impact Positive impact Positive impact No judgement N/A = Environmental effect is Not Applicable in this case possible at possible possible For each environmental effect present likely likely place a cross (X) in one or For detailed explanation refer to the correspondingly two of the columns numbered sections following this table A B C D E F 1-1 Low flow regime X Hydrology 1-2 Flood regime X 1-3 Operation of dams X N/A 1-4 Fall of water table X 1-5 Rise of water table X 2-1 Solute dispersion X Pollution 2-2 Toxic substances X 2-3 Organic pollution X 2-4 Anaerobic effects X N/A 2-5 Gas emissions X 3-1 Soil salinity X 3-2 Soil properties X Soils 3-3 Saline groundwater X 3-4 Saline drainage X 3-5 Saline intrusion X 4-1 Local erosion X Sediments 4-2 Hinterland effect X 4-3 River morphology X N/A 4-4 Channel regime X 4-5 Sedimentation X 4-6 Estuary erosion X N/A 5-1 Project lands X X Positive and negative impacts possible 5-2 Water bodies X 5-3 Surrounding area X Positive and negative impacts possible. Ecology 5-4 Valleys & shores X N/A 5-5 Wetlands & plains X N/A 5-6 Rare species X 5-7 Animal migration X 5-8 Natural industry X 6-1 Population change X 6-2 Income & amenity X Socio-economic 6-3 Human migration X 6-4 Resettlement X See below. 6-5 Women’s role X 6-6 Minority groups X 6-7 Sites of value X 6-8 Regional effects X 6-9 User involvement X 6-10 Recreation X 7-1 Water & sanitation X 7-2 Habitation X 7-3 Health services X 7-4 Nutrition X Health 7-5 Relocation effect X 7-6 Disease ecology X 7-7 Disease hosts X 7-8 Disease control X 7-9 Other hazards X 8-1 Pests & weeds X Imbalances 8-2 Animal diseases X 8-3 Aquatic weeds X 8-4 Structural damage X 8-5 Animal imbalances X Number of crosses 6 4 34 5 3 3 Total possible = 53 (Unless positive & negative impacts) 30 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals Annotated Questions from ICID Checklist, with Comments from the Checklist 1. Hydrological changes 1.1 Low flow regime Is the flow regime of the river substantially changed by the Project and its dams (by more than +/- 20% in low flow periods)? If so, does this change benefit or impair aquatic ecosystems, existing or potential downstream abstractions, hydropower or recreational uses? The rehabilitation works in Low Hrazdan Main Canal will not have any impact on low flow regime of the Rivers Hrazdan and Metsamor. At the intake structure the flow regime of the River Hrazdan is regulated by water releases from Lake Sevan taking into account the required flow volumes for the existing intake structures, hydropower, recreational and sanitary/environmental uses. The headwork water intake junction of the irrigation system (Artashat main canal takes water from it and Low Hrazdan canal originates at 1.5 km of this junction) is in good technical shape and makes precise control of the water regime possible. The River Metsamor at the water intake of the Sevjur Left-side Canal has a stable and permanent flow with little fluctuations. The project does not envisage any changes in the water intake amount, therefore, no significant change in river flow regime is expected downstream of the water intake junction. 1.2 Flood regime Is the flood regime of the river (peak discharge and stage, speed of flood waves, flood super- position with joining rivers, duration or extent of floodplain inundations downstream) substantially changed by the Project as a result of changes in abstractions, retention storage, reservoir releases, flood protection works, new road/rail routs, river training or surface drainage works? If so, does this change benefit or impair aquatic and flood-affected ecosystems, lead to an increase or decrease in flood damage or change land use restrictions outside the Project? There will be no impact on the flood regime of the rivers/source waters (the Rivers Hrazdan and Metsamor) as a result of the canals’ rehabilitation works. The headwork water intake junctions of the canals effectively control the water regime in the canals. Therefore there is no risk of exceeding the allowed water level in the canals. 1.3 Operation of dams Can modifications to the operation of any storage or flood retention reservoir(s) compensate for any adverse impacts associated with changes in flow regime, whiles minimizing the losses to the Project and other users? Possible modifications affecting water quality downstream, saline intrusion, the sediment regime of channels, the ecology of affected areas, amenity values, disease transmission or 31 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals aquatic weed growth should be considered (A separate environmental assessment of large reservoir(s) may be required.) Not applicable. 1.4 Fall of water table Does the Project cause a fall of the water table (from groundwater abstractions, reduced infiltration due to river training, drainage or flood protection works)? If so, does this fall lead to increased potential for groundwater recharge (from seasonal rainfall) and improved conditions for land use; or lead to depletion of the groundwater system, affecting wells, springs, river flows and wetlands? The rehabilitation of the canal bed and hydrotechnical structures will reduce the water losses from the canals and will not cause groundwater level changes in the impact area of Low Hrazdan Canals Phases I and II and Shah Aru Canals as groundwater levels in these areas are situated at 10m to 15 m depth. 1.5 Rise of water table Does the Project cause a rise of the water table (from increased infiltration or seepage from irrigation, seepage from reservoirs and canals, or increased floodplain inundation)? If so, does this rise lead to improved yield of wells and springs and improved capillary rise into the root zone; or lead to water logging of agricultural or other land in the Project area or vicinity? The site visit along the canals was conducted in the second part of July during the high water season, when the water table in the canals reached maximum available level. During the visit no flooding or water logging of agricultural lands was observed in the project area. Project implementation will lead to an increase in water permeability, reduction of water losses and improved water control. 2. Organic and inorganic pollution 2.1 Solute dispersion Are the Project and its dams leading to changes in the concentrations of organic or inorganic solutes in the surface water due to changes to the pattern of water abstraction and reuse in the basin or flow regulation? If so, do the changes benefit or impair biological communities or domestic, agricultural or industrial water users in the basin? The project will not cause changes to the pattern of water abstraction or flow regulation. 2.2 Toxic substances Are significant levels of toxic substance accumulating or being introduced, mobilized and transmitted due to the construction and operation of the Project and its dams, or are levels being reduced? Substances such as pesticides, herbicides, hydrogen sulphide, oil derivatives, boron, selenium and heavy metals in irrigation supplies or surface, draining and ground waters should be considered. 32 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals Increased or increasingly intensive cultivation of irrigated lands may lead to increased use of mineral fertilizers and pesticides. Safe use of fertilizers and pesticides is addressed in farmer training under the program. It is likely that during construction there will be spills or leakages of oil, grease and toxic substances into canal waters, surface waters or groundwater. 2.3 Organic Pollution Are nutrients, organic compounds and pathogens being reduced or introduced and concentrated, due to the Project, its dams and its associated domestic settlements? If so, does the change result in a reduction or increase in environmental and water use problems in the Project area or downstream (in rivers, canals, reservoirs, and lakes, evaporation wet lands, depressions, deltas, estuary regions) or in the groundwater? The starting point of Low Hrazdan Main Canal Phase I passes through Yerevan city, thereafter it passes through the administrative area of other communities and through dwellings. During the field visit it was observed that residents along the canal dump domestic waste into the canal. That was testified by the sediments taken out of the canal. The sediments were mainly in the form of sand. Increased or increasingly intensive cultivation of irrigated lands may lead to increased use of fertilizers and pesticides (herbicides and pesticides, etc.). But fertilizer and pesticide use is currently at very modest levels and, given the rising cost of fossil fuel inputs, is unlikely to increase significantly. 2.4 Anaerobic effects Is the Project reducing or creating anaerobic conditions or eutrophication in any impoundments, natural lakes, pools or wetlands due to changed input or accumulation of fertilizers, other nutrients and organic matter or due to changed water quality resulting from dams, river abstractions and drainage flows? No. 2.5 Gas Emissions Is the Project, either directly or through associated industrial processing, causing decreased or increased gas emissions which contribute to air pollution (O3, SO3, H2S, NOx, NH4, etc) or the greenhouse effect (CO2, CH4, NOx, etc)? During construction, air is likely to be polluted as a result of transport operation. This will be temporary and within the permissible standards. Insofar as increased irrigation increases fodder supplies or through improved income generation stimulates production of cattle and sheep, emissions of methane would increase accordingly. These amounts would be very modest in the context of Armenia’s total livestock production. 33 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals 3. Soil Properties and salinity effects 3.1 Soil salinity Is the Project leading to progressive accumulation of salts in the soils of the project area or the vicinity because of prevailing high salt content in the soil, the groundwater, or the surface water; or can a progressive leaching effect be expected? No impact likely. No salinized soils or saline surface water have been observed in the project area or the vicinity. 3.2 Soil properties Is the Project leading to changes in soil characteristics within the Project area or the vicinity due to such activities as irrigation, the application of fertilizers or other chemicals, cultivation practices or dewatering through drainage? Changes which can improve or impair soil structure, workability, permeability, fertility association with nutrient changes, humus content, pH, acid sulphate or hard pan formation or available water capacity should be considered. Positive impact likely; project implementation will lead to a reduction of water losses and increase in water permeability thus farmers will be provided with the required amount of water for irrigation purposes. Provision of the required amount of water, maintenance of irrigation norms, the use of proper watering methods and appropriate coordination of agro technical measures should improve soil quality and structure. A significant positive change is expected especially in newly owned and cultivated lands and new. 3.3 Saline groundwater Are changes to the rates of seepage, percolation or leaching from the Project and its dams increasing or decreasing the concentrations of chlorides, nitrates or other salts in the groundwater? No saline groundwater was observed in the project area. 3.4 Saline drainage Are changes to the concentrations of chlorides, nitrates or other salts in the runoff or drainage water from the Project area in danger of affecting biological communities or existing or potential downstream users (particularly during low flow conditions)? No impact likely. 3.5 Saline Intrusion Are the Project and its dams leading to changes in saline water (sea water) intrusion into the estuary or into groundwater due ot changes in low flow, groundwater use, dredging or river training? If so, are the changes likely to affect biological communities and water users in the Project vicinity and other areas? 34 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals No. 4. Erosion and sedimentation 4.1 Local erosion Is increased or decreased soil loss or gully erosion being caused within or close to the Project area by changes in land gradient and vegetative cover, by irrigation and cultivation practice, from banks of canals, roads and dams, from areas of cut and fill or due to storm drainage provision? Local erosion has not been observed in the project area. The rehabilitation of the canals will prevent seepage and other kinds of losses (leakage from canal walls, leakage from damaged hydrotechnical structure junctions). Local erosion processes are likely to occur during the renovation of access roads passing through gentle slopes. 4.2 Hinterland effect Are the Project and its dams leading to changes in natural vegetation, land productivity and erosion through changes in population density, animal husbandry, dryland farming practices, forest cover, soil conservation measures, in the region? Once supplied with the required amount of water farmers will cultivate higher value crops in previously irrigated and in newly irrigated areas. It will lead to an increase in crop yield and farmers’ incomes, also in raising more livestock. 4.3 River morphology Is the regime of the river(s) changed by the Project and its dams through changes in the quantity or seasonal distribution of flows and flood peaks in the river(s), the abstraction of clear water, changes in sediment yield (caused by 4.1 and 4.2), the trapping of sediments in reservoirs or the flushing of sediment control structures? If so, do these changes benefit or impair aquatic ecosystems or existing or potential users downstream? No. 4.4 Channel structures Is scouring, aggradation, or bank erosion in the river(s),endangering the Project’s river headworks, offtake structures, weir or pump inlets, its canal network, drainage or flood protection works, the free flow of its drainage system or structures and developments downstream? Consider effects associated with changes noted in 4.3 as well as those caused by other existing and planned upstream developments. The canal network is the target beneficiary of this component. 35 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals 4.5 Sedimentation Are the changes noted in 4.1 – 4.4 causing increased or decreased sediment deposition in irrigation or drainage canals, hydraulic structures, storage reservoirs or on cultivated land, either via the irrigation systems or the river(s)? If so, do these changes benefit or impair soil fertility, Project operation, land cultivation or the capacity and operation of reservoirs? The project implementation will not have any significant impact on sediment accumulation in Low Hrazdan main canals, soil fertility, land cultivation and operation of hydrotechnical structures. Low Hrazdan canal originates at 1.5 km of Artashat main canal that takes water from the River Hrazdan through a water intake structure. The sediments accumulate in the water intake structure. Sediments that accumulate in canal floors are small in volume and do not impact on the canal’s hydrological regime. They are cleaned by operating agencies before the start of the irrigation season. 4.6 Estuary erosion Are the Project and its dams leading to changes in the hydrological or sediment regimes of the river which can affect delta formation or estuary and coastal erosion? If so, do these changes benefit or impair aquatic ecosystems (estuarine or marine), local habitation or other uses of the estuary? No. 5. Biological and ecological changes Is the Project, its dams or its associated infrastructure causing substantial and permanent changes (positive or negative) within the habitats listed in 5.1 – 5.5?  natural ecology (habitat, vegetation, terrestrial animals, birds, fish and other aquatic animals and plants),  areas of special scientific interest  biological diversity Include the likely ecological benefit of any new or modified habitats created and of any protective or mitigation measures adopted (such as nature reserves and compensatory forests). Include the likely ecological benefit of any new or modified habitats created and of any protective or mitigation measures adopted (such as nature reserves and compensatory forests). 5.1 Project lands No significant changes are anticipated in the habitats or wildlife populations of the canals and their alienation zones. 36 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals 5.2 Water bodies Aside from the canals themselves, the source-rivers (Hrazdan and Metsamor River) and mostly seasonal ponds, there are no other significant water bodies within the project area. 5.3 Surrounding area The FS/FD Report estimates that the increased water availability through the rehabilitated canals will allow an additional 1,700 ha to come under irrigation. Neither the FS/FD nor our own field investigations have examined the targeted expansion area sites. It is assumed that these will be similar in nature to those already under irrigated cultivation. 5.4 Valleys & shores Not applicable. 5.5 Wetlands & plains According to the FS/FD report and results of the visit, the project will not have significant and permanent changes and impacts on wetlands and plains. 5.6 Rare species Is the existence of any rare, endangered or protected species in the region enhanced or threatened by the changes noted in 5.1-5.5? 15 species of plants registered in the Red Book of the RA are encountered in this area, among which one endemic type is registered in the Red List of the International Union of Nature Protection (IUNP). Among animals registered in the Red Book of Armenia, three species of mammals, five species of reptiles and amphibians Pelobates syriacus are encountered in this area. As a result of rehabilitation works it is not anticipated though that there will be any potential direct or indirect negative impact on the above-mentioned animals. 5.7 Animal migration Does the Project, its dams or new road/rail routes affect the migration patters of wild animals, birds or fish? Make allowance for the compensatory effect of any additional provision within the Project (canal crossings, fish passes, spawning locations, resting or watering places, shade, considerate operation). Among the migratory animals encountered in the rehabilitated canal area mainly fish species may be affected as a result of canal rehabilitation and operation. Special attention should be paid to 37 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals protection of endemic Armenian Rutilus rutilus schelkownikowi that is encountered in the River Sevjur. Fish species may freely enter the canal. Therefore according to inhabitants this phenomenon will not extend so much and will not have a significant negative impact. Besides it should be noted that no changes are expected to occur in the amounts of water taken from the water source(s). 5.8 Natural industry Are commercial or subsistence activities depending on the natural terrestrial and aquatic environment benefited or adversely affected by the Project through ecological changes or changes in human access? Changes affecting such activities as fisheries, harvesting from natural vegetation, timber, game hunting or viewing and honey production should be considered. As a result of the project, orchards and vegetable growing are anticipated to expand due to the increase in new irrigated lands and the improvement of the water supply of previously irrigated lands. Expanded cultivation of fruit trees and vegetables would increase bee habitat and honey production. Increased horticulture will also yield wood for fuel. 6 Socio-Economic impacts 6.1 Population change Is the Project causing significant demographic changes in the Project area or vicinity which may affect social harmony? Changes in population size/density and demographic/ethnic composition should be considered. Like elsewhere in rural areas of Armenia, some of the young people are seeking opportunities off the farms, but the residents mention that the number of the people leaving has considerably decreased in comparison with 5-6 years ago. The provision of sufficient irrigation water will give an opportunity to the youth to do farming and will presumably reduce the number of people leaving abroad for work. 6.2 Income and amenity Is the Project introducing significant economic/political changes which can increase or decrease social harmony and individual well-being? Changes in the general levels of employment and income, in the provisions of local infrastructure and amenities, in the relative distribution of income, property values and Project benefits (including access to irrigation water) and in the demand for labor and skills (particularly in relation to family/political hierarchy and different sexes and social groups) should be considered. Farmers are aware of the proposed project, and expect to benefit from it. Many are indirect beneficiaries from the rehabilitation work on irrigation canals provided by the World Bank (about 4 38 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals km long section at the starting point of Sevjur left-side canal has been completely rehabilitated). Nevertheless, increased levels of irrigation water or more reliable delivery is not considered a critical economic variable. The increased cost of agricultural inputs, including fertilizer, pesticides, land taxes, water charges and the cost of petrol are causing economic distress to small farmers. In effect, they are saying that in spite of their best efforts, that at the end of the day, “they have no income.� They noted that each year it becomes “more and more difficult to make money from farming.� 6.3 Human migration Has adequate provision been made for any temporary or migratory population influx to avoid social deprivation, hardship or conflicts within these groups or between the permanent and temporary groups? Human migration arising both from the demand for skills/labor during construction and from the requirements for seasonal agricultural labor should be considered. No human migration into or out of the area is anticipated as a consequence of project activities. 6.4 Resettlement Has adequate provision been made for the resettlement, livelihood and integration of any people displaced by the Project and its dams or losing land, grazing or other means of income due to the Project? Also, has adequate provision been made for the subsistence farming needs of people settled on or associated with the Project? No resettlement is anticipated as a consequence of project activities. 6.5 Women’s role Does the Project change the status and role of women (positively or negatively) in relation to social standing, work load, access to income and heritage and marital rights? In view of the nature of the proposed works (rehabilitation of sections of an already existing main irrigation canal), no impact is expected on the status and role of women. 6.6 Minority groups Are the Project and its dams causing changes to the lifestyle, livelihoods or habitation of any social groups (particularly minority groups) leading to major conflicts with, or changes to their traditional behavior, social organization or cultural and religious practices? Members of the Yezdi minority live in some of the communities of the project area while Ferik community is wholly inhabited by Yezdi population. In view of the nature of the proposed works 39 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals (rehabilitation of sections of an existing main irrigation canal) no impact is expected on minority groups that is different from impact on other or majority groups. Both are considered project beneficiaries. 6.7 Sites of Value Is access improved or hampered to places of aesthetic and scenic beauty, sites of historical and religious significance or mineral and palaeontological resources? Also, are any such sites being destroyed by the Project? In view of the nature of the proposed works and the existence of designated service areas (“alienation zones�) along the canals that will be utilized for these works, no impact is expected as there are no known sites of value within the restricted area of the canal. 6.8 Regional Effects Are the economic, infrastructural, social and demographic changes associated with the Project likely to enhance, restrict or lead to unbalanced regional development? Also, has adequate provision been made for new transport, marketing and processing needs associated with the Project? Increased efficiency and utilization of irrigation facilities should lead to higher levels of farm productivity. Minor positive regional impacts are expected, principally comprising a greater level of farm production available in local and regional markets. Farmers noted that it has become very difficult for them to make current and capital investments in agricultural products which is conditioned by the increase in prices for seeds, medical equipment and facilities. 6.9 User Involvement Has there been adequate user and public participation in project planning, implementation and operation to ensure Project success and reduce future conflicts? The potential for incorporating within the Project existing systems of land tenure, traditional irrigation, and existing organizational and sociological structures and for the provision of new or extended facilities for credit, marketing, agricultural extension and training should be considered. Public participation has been ensured during project planning and the implementation of project preparation activities that involved local WUA and Water Intake employees. People of the project will be involved in project implementation activities. 40 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals 6.10 Recreation Are the Project and its dams creating new recreational possibilities (fishing, hunting, sailing, canoeing, swimming, scenic walks, etc) and are existing facilities impaired, preserved or improved? The proposed project activities will have no impact on recreational activities in the area. 7 Health Consider each of the items 7.1-7.9 in relation to the local population, the labor force during construction and their camp followers, the resettled and newly resettled populations and migratory labor groups. The rehabilitation study of the Low Hrazdan Main Canal proposes to improve several sections of the main canals to increase the efficiency of the system as a whole. These rehabilitation works are not assumed to have any negative or positive immediate health effect on the population in its vicinity, apart perhaps during the period of actual construction work when increased vehicular movement may be causing some disturbance and additional emissions in the area. These potential and temporary effects are duly described in the EMP to reduce those temporary effects to the extent possible and desirable. As elsewhere in the Ararat Valley and its vicinity, malaria is under control and the reduction of areas with standing water may contribute to further improving the situation. In the longer term it is assumed that, through increased production and income, the population’s health may improve. 8 Ecological Imbalances 8.1 Pests & weeds: Are crop pests or weeds likely to increase or decrease (particularly those favored by irrigation/drainage/flood control) affecting yields, cultivation and requirements for pesticides or herbicides? Some increase in weeds and pests may be expected as irrigated agriculture expands, but overall, the improved efficiency and reliability of the system should enable farmers to manage their cropped fields more effectively as result of which the impact will be very significant. 8.2 Animal diseases: Are domestic animals in the Project or vicinity more or less exposed to hazard diseases and parasites as a result of the Project and its dams? No. 41 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals 8.3 Aquatic weeds Are reservoirs, rivers or irrigation and drainage canals likely to support aquatic vegetation or algae? If so, can these plants be harvested or controlled, or will they reduce the storage/conveyance capacity, interfere with the operation of hydraulic structures or lead to oxygen-oversaturated or anaerobic water bodies? Rehabilitation of the canal system will reduce further what is already – except in a few currently neglected spots -- a low incidence of aquatic weeds in the Low Hrazdan Main Canal. 8.4 Structural damage: Is there a danger of significant damage being caused to dams, embankments, canal banks or other components of the irrigation/drainage/flood control works through the action of plants and animals (including rodents and termites) favored by the Project? The rehabilitation works, if properly constructed and maintained, will eliminate current damages, and prevent potential structural damage in the future. The existence of plants and animals (including rodents and termites), does not present any threat to canal hydraulic structures. 8.5 Animal imbalances Does the Project cause zoological imbalances (insects, rodents, birds and other wild animals) through habitat modification, additional food supply and shelter, extermination of predators, reduced competition or increased diseases? No. Any negative changes would be marginal and temporary. 42 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals Annex E: Environmental and Environmental Clauses for Civil Works Contracts The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) provides general and specific guidance on protection and mitigation of potential environmental damage. The EMP is attached to these Technical Specifications, and shall be considered as binding on the Contractor. All necessary measures on protection of environment shall be carried out by the Contractor in accordance with the order of competent authorities, the EMP, and instructions of the Engineer. 1. Obligations of the Contractor The general environmental and social obligations of the Contractor within this Contract, without prejudice to other official provisions in force, include the following: � The Contractor shall respect the environmental regulatory provisions in force in the Republic of Armenia (including those announced during the execution of the works if imposed by the Engineer), the contractual provisions of this Contract as well as the conditions fixed by the various required authorizations or approvals; � The Contractor shall fully assume responsibility for the consequences of his choices and actions; in particular, and without prejudice to the regulatory provisions in force, he guarantees, if necessary, the repair at his cost and according to the most appropriate technologies and deadlines, notably with regard to the level of sensitivity of the site concerned, of damage caused to the environment and residents by failure to respect regulatory and/or administrative provisions and/or the applicable technical specifications, as well as the payment of fines, damages or other penalties which may be incumbent upon him; � Contractor shall agree with the Engineer the technical approaches and solutions to the rehabilitation of stretches of the Main Canal where encroachments of the alienation zone are observed. Preference should be given to the technical solutions that do not require taking or demolition of temporary and permanent private properties. In case the taking or demolition of property cannot be avoided the Contractor shall notify the Engineer and ESIO and cease the works in that particular section of the Main Canal. Construction activities may only proceed with approval of the Engineer. � The Contractor shall take all measures to ensure the environmental quality of operations which are the subject of this contract, and not disrupt the quality of life of the adjacent villages, in particular by applying the applicable specifications and provisions. The Contractor shall consider the execution of works or the implementation of environmental and social provisions as an integral part of the operations relating to the general construction program of the works; and � Appropriate information and training for Contractor personnel, including management staff, with regard to the security and/or quality of operations; � The Contractor shall inform the local authorities (village mayor, council of elders) and the affected population on planned construction activities, sites and schedule at least 2 weeks in advance of any planned construction activities; 43 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals � The Contractor shall hold information meetings at least 2 weeks before entering any village area for planned construction activities, to inform the villagers of the nature of the forthcoming works, their duration, and all effects such as dust, smoke, or noise that will be felt in the village, whether such effects are to be mitigated or not; � The Contractor shall refrain from destroying, removing or clearing trees, timber, scrub, crops and other flora to any extent greater than is approved by the Engineer as being necessary for the execution of this Contract and shall take such measures as may be necessary to prevent his employees from hunting, disturbing, capturing or destroying stock, crops and such flora as may be protected by relevant statutes; � Borrow pits or other similar excavations as well as waste accumulation and disposal sites shall be in locations approved by the Engineer; � Controlling pollution, noise and nuisances generated by the works; � The re-use of materials available on the existing site each time the technical and financial conditions allow for this in a satisfactory manner from the point of view of the Engineer. Recycling and reuse of wastes (e.g. lubricants, plastic bottles, paper) is encouraged where appropriate. Strictly banning the use of fire for clearing and grubbing and cleaning sites, except for the treatment of organic waste as approved by the Engineer; � The maximum preservation of natural resources and the minimization of the use of space, soil and vegetation, in particular by the minimizing of cleared and stripped surfaces, by the passage of blades at a high level (5 cm above the natural ground level) each time that a simple clearing or a provisional storage of material is required, by controlling logging, including any tree alignments, by the appropriate management of the topsoil, by driving and working the machines perpendicular to the slope, by the maintenance on the sites of naturally grassed areas, and by the control of site erosion; � As appropriate the systematic stripping of topsoil of all work sites unless (with prior consent of the Engineer) the soil structure of the surface, predominantly organic matter ("topsoil" or mud), does not exist or has a thickness less than the working height adjustment of the blade of the excavator or machine used, taking into account the state of the terrain (eroded soil, gravel, soil with rocks that prevent the passage of the machine, etc.); � The Contractor shall respect, for the whole of his site (including borrow sites and disposal areas, quarries and installations) the zones, areas, elements and periods which are environmentally sensitive, including, but not limited to locations and areas identified in the EMP. In the project areas adjacent to specially protected areas, machinery shall not go beyond the alienation zone; there shall be no waste accumulations and waste disposal sites in the same areas; and there shall be no use and storage of explosives and toxic and chemical substances; � Any discharge or disposal of used water, mud, grout, bituminous products, pollutants of any kind, etc. into wells, boreholes, surface water or groundwater, water courses, natural streams, drains, ditches, etc. is strictly forbidden; � It is forbidden to create a dam or alter a permanent or temporary watercourse for the requirements of the site (unless otherwise specified in the Design), without authorisation of the Engineer; 44 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals � All construction vehicles shall travel at slow speed (as specified in Armenian legislation) within 100 m on either side of any areas around villages where children are present; � The control of health risks relating to the works and personnel of the Contractor, in particular the adoption of minimum hygiene rules at the work sites and camps and for the benefit of residents, the control of dust emissions in populated areas and the control of stagnant waters as specified in the EMP; � Contractor shall exercise every reasonable precaution to protect from injury persons or property. The Contractor shall erect and maintain all necessary temporary fencing, barricades, barriers, signs and lights and provide fire alarm, fire extinguishing and fire fighting services at strategic points on the Site. The Contractor shall also be responsible for erecting and maintaining structures for storage and containment of hazardous materials or liquids. The Contractor shall adopt and enforce such rules and regulations as may be necessary, desirable or proper to safeguard the public, all persons engaged in the work and its supervision. The Contractor shall be responsible for the flagging and control of traffic and he shall comply with the requirements of the Engineer and competent authority in these matters. Contractor shall keep clear and in good working order all temporary access road structures, bridges, culverts, drains and other waterways necessary for the execution of the works during the term of the Contract; � The Contractor shall ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of his personnel including those of his subcontractors and of all other persons on the Site or crossing the site. The Contractor shall provide protective clothing and equipment to workers that are appropriate to the workers’ tasks. The Contractor shall be fully responsible for ensuring necessary first aid services to his staff and workmen, including transport for injured personnel to hospital or other appropriate accommodation as and when required. The organization of the construction sites and work places, and the Contractor’s approach to the aspects listed below, shall be included in the ESHSP, details of which are included in Clause 2.21.2, to be prepared by the Contractor and approved by the Engineer. � The cleaning, restoration and then, if necessary, the appropriate rehabilitation or redevelopment of work sites, camps, quarries and borrow pits released by the Contractor as the work progresses. This obligation, which includes possible drainage of stagnant water and the completion of compensatory tree plantations (if envisaged by the Design), is a condition of the acceptance of the works; � Taking appropriate sanctions against personnel violating the applicable specifications and provisions on environmental and social matters; � Checking, by regular inspection, that all stipulated environmental and social provisions are being adhered to; � Systematically and in timely manner informing PIU and Technical Supervision Consultant of each incident or accident, damage or degradation caused to the environment, workers or residents or their assets, in the course of the works. Contractor shall also take appropriate measures, as approved by the Engineer, to address the incident or accident in timely fashion; and � Environmental and social monitoring of the works by the ESO (as defined in Clause 2.21.2., Sub- clause 2.21.2.2(ii)), and the writing of corresponding monthly reports. 45 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals 2. Environmental, Social, Health and Safety Plan The Contractor shall establish an Environmental, Social, Health and Safety Plan (ESHSP) in order to meet his obligations concerning this matter; the ESHSP particularly shall include the following: 1. Management Acknowledgements 2. Organization & Staffing 3. Communications and Reporting 4. Environmental, Health and Safety Management Provisions The Contractor shall prepare and submit for the Engineer’s approval an ESHSP within 30 days of the commencement date. The Engineer may require periodic reviews, including updating of the ESHSP during the Works. 2.1 Management Acknowledgement (i) Certification and Commitment The ESHSP submitted by the Contractor shall provide a signed statement from the Contractor’s Managing Director(s) attesting to a commitment that all environmental protection, safety, and occupational health aspects of the Contract will be given highest priority in the discharge of contractual obligations and certifying a commitment to the provisions in the EMP, and ESHSP as approved by the Engineer. (ii) Statutory Understanding and Compliance The Plan shall provide a statement attesting the firm’s understanding of, and means of ensuring due compliance with, the statutory regulations relating to construction work in the Republic of Armenia, specifically in regard to compliance with: (a) All safety and occupational health legislation including, without limitation, the Rules and Regulations of the Republic of Armenia and the authorities having jurisdiction. (b) All current environmental laws and regulations, including both national and local regulations, related to the following, but not limited to: - Noise; - Vibration; 46 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals - Air pollution; - Water contamination; - Solid and hazardous waste disposal; - Liquid waste disposal; - Sanitary conditions (water supply, sewerage, etc.); - Use of explosives; and - Protection of public traffic, - Historical, cultural and archaeological monuments/sites, - Resettlement, land acquisition, servitude, temporary use of land and compensation, etc. (iii) Availability of Documents The Plan shall state where copies of safety and occupational health regulations and documents will be available on the construction site and verify that all regulations and documents have been or will be available. (iv) Management of Subcontractors The requirements of this and related sections and obligations therein shall include for execution of parts of the Works by the approved subcontractors whilst the Contractor shall: (a) Provide subcontractors with copies of the ESHSP whilst incorporating such provisions into all sub-contracts and ensure compliance with such plan under the Contract. (b) Require all subcontractors to appoint a safety representative who shall be available on the site throughout the operational period of the respective sub-contract and ensure as far as is practically possible that staff and employees of subcontractors are conversant with appropriate parts of the ESHSP and the statutory regulations. 2.2 Organization and Staffing (i) Organization Chart The Plan shall include an organization chart identifying (by job title and by the name of the individual) the personnel to be engaged solely for environmental protection, safety and traffic control. The chart and the supporting text shall identify participants and their areas of responsibility and contact details. 47 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals (ii) Appointment of Environmental Safety Officer (ESO) The Contractor shall submit for approval the name and details (full CV) of his proposal for an ESO to the Engineer within 14 days of the commencement date. The ESO shall be responsible for day-to- day issues of environmental management for the duration of the Contract. The Contractor shall obtain approval of such person being appointed, who shall be in position to carry out his duties prior to Works activities commencing on site except as may be agreed in exceptional circumstances in writing with the Engineer. The ESO will not be removed from the site without the express written permission of the Engineer. Within fourteen (14) days of any such removal or notice of intent of removal, a replacement ESO will be nominated for approval by the Engineer. The ESO shall be empowered to instruct employees of the Contractor and Subcontractors to cease operations and shall take the appropriate action as is necessary and within his limits of delegation by informing others as may be appropriate to prevent unsafe working practices or other infringements of the Plan or the statutory regulations. The ESO shall maintain a daily site diary comprehensively recording all relevant matters concerning site environmental management, safety and traffic control, inspections and audits, related incidents and the like. The site diary shall be available at all times for inspection by the Engineer and his staff. 2.3 Communication and Reporting The Contractor shall prepare and submit to the Engineer for his approval monthly progress reports on compliance with implementation of EMP and ESHSP. It is expected that these reports will include information on: � Environmental, social, health, and safety management actions/measures taken, including approvals sought from local or national authorities; � Problems encountered in relation to environmental, social, health, and safety aspects (incidents, including delays, cost consequences, etc. as a result thereof); � Lack of compliance with contract requirements on the part of the Contractor; � Changes of assumptions, conditions, measures, designs and actual works in relation to environmental, social, health, and safety aspects; � Observations, concerns raised and/or decisions taken with regard to environmental, social, health, and safety management during site meetings; � Chance historical, cultural and archaeological finds; � Follow-up on the status and efficacy of remedial measures and/or corrective actions identified in Incident Reporting Forms included in EMPs or otherwise; and � Follow-up, including remedial measures, status of measures and their efficacy, related to lack of compliance with contract requirements. 48 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals 2.4 Environmental, Health and Safety Management Provisions ESHSP should include at minimum the methodology and resources to meet the requirements of these Technical Specifications including but not limited to the following: � Stakeholder communication and information dissemination; � Relevant staff training; � Maintaining farmers’ access to irrigation water if the Works are implemented during the irrigation season; � Maintaining vehicle access to the communities; � Pollution control (including spill prevention, dust abatement, noise, etc.); � Provision of potable water and washing/toilet facilities to workers; � Provision of lodging and insecticide-treated mosquito nets to workers as appropriate; � Provision of health care to workers and treatment for injuries and infections; and providing workers with access to condoms; � Assessing importance of, and reporting and investigating, chance historical, cultural and archaeological finds; � Inspection and monitoring. 49 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals Annex F: Minutes of Meeting of Public Consultations Held in Communities and WUAs Date: 10.06.2011 Community: Bagramyan Participants: H.Harutyunyan PIU Irrigation Officer N.Atayan PIU Environmental and Social Impact Officer, V.Movsisyan Institutional Improvements Officer S.Sedrakyan Director of Vagarshapat WUA B.Shahbazyan Governor of Bagramyan community Water users of Bagramyan community Agenda To carry out public discussions of environmental and social impacts and other issues related to rehabilitation of deteriorated stretches of Stage 1 canal of Hrazdan irrigation scheme. V.Movsisyan presented in details the proposed project and the nature of anticipated activities. N.Atayan presented environmental and social aspects of the anticipated works. The Governor of Bagramyan community B.Shahbazyan raised the issue of the rehabilitation of on- farm irrigation networks. V. Movsisyan clarified that the rehabilitation of on-farm irrigation networks included in the project will be implemented on the condition of 15% co-financing by water users. The director of Vagarshapat WUA S.Sedrakyan reminded that the community first has to approach with that issue to the Administrative Council of WUA. The Council will discuss the request of community and apply to PIU specialists, if required. In case of positive opinion of PIU, the on-farm irrigation system will be included into the Project. Water user L.Sadoyan raised the issue of involvement of local population in construction works. PIU specialists clarified that one of the Project’s objectives is to involve in civil works as much local population as possible to increase local employment. Local people will be hired if they posses required construction skills. The list of water users having participated in public consultations is attached. Governor of Bagramyan Community B.Shahbazyan /signature/ Secretary R.Galstyan /signature/ /SEAL/ 50 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals LIST OF PARTICIPANTS OF THE PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS LOW HRAZDAN IRRIGATION SCHEME “Vagharshapat� WUA Date 10.06.2011 Community Bagramyan Participant’s Name Participant’s position and Signature occupation Disayan Grigor Water User /signature/ Shahbazyan Vardan Water User /signature/ Zakaryan Hovhannes Water User /signature/ Zakaryan Vardan Water User /signature/ Zakaryan Norik Water User /signature/ Grigoryan Frunz Water User /signature/ Margaryan Harutun Water User /signature/ Gevorgyan Rafik Water User /signature/ Hakobyan Aghvan Water User /signature/ Mkhitaryan Khachik Water User /signature/ Hovhannisyan Gnel Water User /signature/ Galstyan Hovhannes Water User /signature/ Khachatryan Tigran Water User /signature/ Galstyan Rafik Water User /signature/ Sadoyan Lyudvig Water User /signature/ Sadoyan Sharo Water User /signature/ Harutunyan Gevorg Water User /signature/ karapetyan Aram Water User /signature/ Gevorgyan Hamlet Water User /signature/ Engibaryan Hovhannes Water User /signature/ Petrosyan Garush Water User /signature/ Petrosyan Artusha Water User /signature/ Arakelyan Varuj Water User /signature/ Harutunyan Siranuhi Water User /signature/ Harutunyan Arshak Water User /signature/ Head of Baghramyan Community B.Shahbazyan /signature/ 51 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals Date: 12.06.2011 Community: Mrgastan Participants: H.Harutyunyan PIU Irrigation Officer N.Atayan PIU Environmental and Social Impact Officer, V.Movsisyan Institutional Improvements Officer S.Sedrakyan Director of Vagarshapat WUA R.Khachatryan Governor of Mrgastan community Water users of Mrgastan community Agenda To carry out public discussions of environmental and social impacts and other issues related to rehabilitation of deteriorated stretches of “Shah Aru� canal of Lower Hrazdan irrigation scheme. H.Harutyunyan presented in details the proposed project and the nature of anticipated activities. N.Atayan presented environmental and social aspects of the anticipated works. The Governor of Mrgastan community R.Khachatryan raised the issue of the rehabilitation of on- farm irrigation networks. H.Harutyunyan clarified that the rehabilitation of on-farm irrigation networks included in the project will be implemented on the condition of 15% co-financing by water users. The director of Vagarshapat WUA S.Sedrakyan reminded that the community first has to approach with that issue to the Administrative Council of WUA. The Council will discuss the request of community and apply to PIU specialists, if required. In case of positive opinion of PIU, the on-farm irrigation system will be included into the Project. Water user A.Margaryan raised the issue of involvement of local population in construction works. PIU specialists clarified that one of the Project’s objectives is to involve in civil works as much local population as possible to increase local employment. Local people will be hired if they posses required construction skills. The list of water users having participated in public consultations is attached. Governor of Mrgastan Community R.Khachatryan /signature/ Secretary S.Garibyan /signature/ /SEAL/ 52 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals LIST OF PARTICIPANTS OF THE PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS LOW-HRAZDAN IRRIGATION SCHEME “Vagharshapat� WUA Date 12.06.2011 Community Mrgastan Participant’s Name Participant’s position Signature and occupation Sargsyan Haykaz Farmer /signature/ Manukyan Tirgan Farmer /signature/ Margaryan Ararat Farmer /signature/ Stepanyan Artur Farmer /signature/ Vardanyan Gegham Farmer /signature/ Asoyan Toros Farmer /signature/ Khachatryan Siran Farmer /signature/ Khachatryan Pavel Farmer /signature/ Chishyan Artur Farmer /signature/ Gevorgyan Seroj Farmer /signature/ Muradyan Mkrtich Farmer /signature/ Avagyan Hrachik Farmer /signature/ Avagyan Khachik Farmer /signature/ Sargsyan Tigran Farmer /signature/ Khachatryan Hakob Farmer /signature/ Hakobyan Gevorg Farmer /signature/ Levonyan Levon Farmer /signature/ Sargsyan Amasia Farmer /signature/ Margaryan Ashot Farmer /signature/ Davtyan Gevorg Farmer /signature/ Head of Mrgastan Community R.Khachatryan /signature/ 53 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals Date: 12.06.2011 Community: Shahumyan Participants: H.Harutyunyan PIU Irrigation Officer N.Atayan PIU Environmental and Social Impact Officer, V.Movsisyan Institutional Improvements Officer S.Sedrakyan Director of Vagarshapat WUA H.Navasardyan Governor of Shahumyan community Water users of Shahumyan community Agenda To carry out public discussions of environmental and social impacts and other issues related to rehabilitation of deteriorated stretches of Stage 1 canal of Hrazdan irrigation scheme. V.Movsisyan presented in details the proposed project and the nature of anticipated activities. N.Atayan presented environmental and social aspects of the anticipated works. The Governor of Shahumyan community H.Navasardyan raised the issue of the rehabilitation of on- farm irrigation networks. V. Movsisyan clarified that the rehabilitation of on-farm irrigation networks included in the project will be implemented on the condition of 15% co-financing by water users. The director of Vagarshapat WUA S.Sedrakyan reminded that the community first has to approach with that issue to the Administrative Council of WUA. The Council will discuss the request of community and apply to PIU specialists, if required. In case of positive opinion of PIU, the on-farm irrigation system will be included into the Project. Water user A.Yayloyan raised the issue of involvement of local population in construction works. PIU specialists clarified that one of the Project’s objectives is to involve in civil works as much local population as possible to increase local employment. Local people will be hired if they posses required construction skills. The list of water users having participated in public consultations is attached. Governor of Shahumyan Community H.Navasardyan /signature/ Secretary G. Hambartsumyan /signature/ /SEAL/ 54 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals LIST OF PARTICIPANTS OF THE PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS LOW-HRAZDAN IRRIGATION SCHEME “Vagharshapat� WUA Date 12.06.2011 Community Shahumyan Participant’s Name Participant’s position and Signature occupation Eghazaryan Surik Farmer /signature/ Hambardzumyan Gagik Water User /signature/ Hambardzumyan Ashot Water User /signature/ Manukyan Khachik Water User /signature/ Nersisyan Valer Water User /signature/ Sargsyan Feliks Water User /signature/ Vardanyan Ghazar Water User /signature/ Khachatryan Vardan Water User /signature/ Nersisyan Volodya Water User /signature/ Eloyan Fenya Water User /signature/ Petrosyan Samvel Water User /signature/ Hambardzumyan Gagik Water User /signature/ Sargsyan Vardan Water User /signature/ Grigoryan Arsen Water User /signature/ Ghazaryan Avetik Water User /signature/ Hovhannisyan Karen Water User /signature/ Sargsyan Artush Water User /signature/ Zohrabyan Varujan Water User /signature/ Melikyan Alvina Water User /signature/ Grigoryan Knarik Water User /signature/ Head of Shahumyan Community H.Navasardyan /signature/ 55 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals Date: 09.06.2011 Community: Aghavnatun Participants: H.Harutyunyan PIU Irrigation Officer N.Atayan PIU Environmental and Social Impact Officer, V.Movsisyan Institutional Improvements Officer S.Sarkissyan Director of Khoy WUA A.Matevosyan Governor of Aghavnatun community Water users of Aghavnatun community Agenda To carry out public discussions of environmental and social impacts and other issues related to rehabilitation of deteriorated stretches of Stage 2 canal of Hrazdan irrigation scheme. H.Harutyunyan presented in details the proposed project and the nature of anticipated activities. N.Atayan presented environmental and social aspects of the anticipated works. The Governor of Aghavnatun community A.Matevosyan raised the issue of the rehabilitation of on- farm irrigation networks. H.Harutyunyan clarified that the rehabilitation of on-farm irrigation networks included in the project will be implemented on the condition of 15% co-financing by water users. The director of Khoy WUA S.Sarkissyan reminded that the community first has to approach with that issue to the Administrative Council of WUA. The Council will discuss the request of community and apply to PIU specialists, if required. In case of positive opinion of PIU, the on-farm irrigation system will be included into the Project. Water user A.Abgaryan raised the issue of involvement of local population in construction works. PIU specialists clarified that one of the Project’s objectives is to involve in civil works as much local population as possible to increase local employment. Local people will be hired if they posses required construction skills. The list of water users having participated in public consultations is attached. Governor of Agavnatun Community A.Matevosyan /signature/ Secretary A.Movsisyan /signature/ /SEAL/ 56 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals LIST OF PARTICIPANTS OF THE PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS LOW-HRAZDAN IRRIGATION SCHEME “Khoyt� WUA Date 09.06.2011 Community Aghavnatun Participant’s Name Participant’s position and Signature occupation Abgaryan Abgar Farmer /signature/ Movsisyan Armen Water User /signature/ Abgaryan Yurik Water User /signature/ Andreasyan Norik Water User /signature/ Grigoryan Beglar Water User /signature/ Panosyan Shura Water User /signature/ Sahakyan Anoush Water User /signature/ Hovhannesyan Hovik Water User /signature/ Beyrutyan Anahit Water User /signature/ Sukiasyan Hambardzum Water User /signature/ Zohrabyan Husik Water User /signature/ Hovhannisyan Tigranuhi Water User /signature/ Ayryan Andranik Water User /signature/ Hayrapetyan Harutun Water User /signature/ Nahapetyan Martunik Water User /signature/ Arzumanyan Ashot Water User /signature/ Harutunyan Gagik Water User /signature/ Sargsyan Aramais Water User /signature/ Smbatyan Yurik Water User /signature/ Baroyan Norik Water User /signature/ Vahanyan Avetik Water User /signature/ Grigoryan Gevorg Water User /signature/ Gevorgyan Liparit Water User /signature/ Gevorgyan Heghush Water User /signature/ Zohrabyan Hrachik Water User /signature/ Head of Aghavnatun Community A.Matevosyan /signature/ 57 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals Date: 09.06.2011 Community: Aragats Participants: H.Harutyunyan PIU Irrigation Officer N.Atayan PIU Environmental and Social Impact Officer, V.Movsisyan Institutional Improvements Officer S.Sarkissyan Director of Khoy WUA A.Kamavosyan Governor of Aragats community Water users of Aragats community Agenda To carry out public discussions of environmental and social impacts and other issues related to rehabilitation of deteriorated stretches of Stage 2 canal of Hrazdan irrigation scheme. H.Harutyunyan presented in details the proposed project and the nature of anticipated activities. N.Atayan presented environmental and social aspects of the anticipated works. The Governor of Aragats community A.Kamavosyan raised the issue of the rehabilitation of on- farm irrigation networks. H.Harutyunyan clarified that the rehabilitation of on-farm irrigation networks included in the project will be implemented on the condition of 15% co-financing by water users. The director of Khoy WUA S.Sarkissyan reminded that the community first has to approach with that issue to the Administrative Council of WUA. The Council will discuss the request of community and apply to PIU specialists, if required. In case of positive opinion of PIU, the on-farm irrigation system will be included into the Project. Water user E.Arsenyan raised the issue of involvement of local population in construction works. PIU specialists clarified that one of the Project’s objectives is to involve in civil works as much local population as possible to increase local employment. Local people will be hired if they posses required construction skills. The list of water users having participated in public consultations is attached. Governor of Aragats Community A.Kamavosyan /signature/ Secretary Kh.Avagyan /signature/ /SEAL/ 58 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals LIST OF PARTICIPANTS OF THE PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS LOW-HRAZDAN IRRIGATION SCHEME “Khoy� WUA Date 09.06.2011 Community Aragats Participant’s Name Participant’s position and Signature occupation Arsenyan Emil Farmer /signature/ Avagyan Khachatur Water User /signature/ Mnacakanyan Samvel Water User /signature/ Karapetyan Manushak Water User /signature/ Shmavonyan Slavik Water User /signature/ Sahakyan Vazgen Water User /signature/ Babayan Pavlik Water User /signature/ Abgaryan Spartak Water User /signature/ Asatryan Natela Water User /signature/ Grigoryan Nshan Water User /signature/ Nikoghosyan Hayk Water User /signature/ Grigoryan Baghdasar Water User /signature/ Uzoyan Amar Water User /signature/ Mekhelyan Mikael Water User /signature/ Saribekyan Arayik Water User /signature/ Gabrielyan Mayis Water User /signature/ Ghazaryan Varazdat Water User /signature/ Nazaryan Vardges Water User /signature/ Hakobyan Hakob Water User /signature/ Epremyan Suren Water User /signature/ melkonyan Vardan Water User /signature/ Gareginyan Atom Water User /signature/ Stepanyan Hrachik Water User /signature/ Enokyan Sashik Water User /signature/ Hakobyan Greta Water User /signature/ Head of Aragats Community A.Kamavosyan /signature/ 59 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals “Vagrashapat� WUA, Lower Hrazdan Irrigation Scheme, Lower Hrazdan stage 1 canal Date: 15.09.2011 Participants: H.Harutyunyan PIU Irrigation Officer N.Atayan PIU Environmental and Social Impact Officer, V.Movsisyan Institutional Improvements Officer S.Sedrakyan Executive Director of Vagarshapat WUA L.Grigoryan Governor of Merdzavan community B.Shahbazyan Governor of Bagramyan community Sh.Karapetyan Governor Norakert community H.Navasardyan Governor of Merdzavan community K.Grigoryan Governor of Echmiadzin community R.Hovsepyan Governor Aygeshat community V.Abrahamyan Governor of Aygek community H.Petrosyan Governor Dasht community Agenda To carry out public discussions of environmental and social impacts and other issues related to rehabilitation of deteriorated stretches of Lower Hrazdan stage 1 canal of Lower Hrazdan irrigations scheme located within the service area of Vagarshapat WUA. H.Harutyunyan presented in details the proposed project and the nature of anticipated activities. N.Atayan presented environmental and social aspects of the anticipated works. The Executive Director of Vagarshapat WUA S.Sedrakyan explained participants how water delivery process within the under-command lands of Lower Hrazdan irrigation scheme, and in particular of Lower Hrazdan stage 1 canal is organized. He confirmed that the rehabilitation of deteriorated stretches of canals will improve water delivery efficiency and significantly reduce water loses. 60 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals The Governors of communities located within under command area of Lower Hrazdan stage 1 canal participating in public consultations first thanked for inclusion of their communities into the rehabilitation deteriorated stretches of the canal. Meantime they asked to include as much labor force as possible from local population in anticipated civil works. The Institutional Reforms expert V.Movsisyan clarified that one of the Project’s objectives is to involve in civil works as much local population as possible to increase local employment. Local people will be hired if they posses required construction skills. The list of participants is attached. Executive Director of Vagarshapat WUA [SIGNATURE] S.Sedrakyan 61 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals List of participants of the Public Consultations “Vagharshapat� WUA, Lower Hrazdan Irrigation Scheme, Lower Hrazdan stage 1 canal Date: 15.09.2011 Participant’s No. Name of community Signature Position name 1. Merdzavam L.Grigoryan [Signature] Head of the community 2. Baghramyan B.Shahbazyan [Signature] Head of the community 3. Norakert Sh.Karapetyan [Signature] Head of the community 5. Shahumyan H.Navasardyan [Signature] Head of the community 6. Echmiadzin K.Grigoryan [Signature] Head of the community 8. Aygeshat R.Hovsepyan [Signature] Head of the community 9. Aygek V.Abrahamyan [Signature] Head of the community 11. Dasht H.Petrosyan [Signature] Head of the community Executive Director of “Vagharshapat� WUA [Signature] /S.Sederakyan/ 62 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals “Vagrashapat� WUA, Lower Hrazdan Irrigation Scheme, Shan Aru Canal Date: 15.09.2011 Participants: H.Harutyunyan PIU Irrigation Officer N.Atayan PIU Environmental and Social Impact Officer, V.Movsisyan Institutional Improvements Officer S.Sedrakyan Executive Director of Vagarshapat WUA R.Khachatryan Governor of Mrgashat community D.Karapetyan Governor of Tsahkunk community Z.Mirzakhanyan Governor Artamet community Agenda To carry out public discussions of environmental and social impacts and other issues related to rehabilitation of deteriorated stretches Shah Aru canal of Lower Hrazdan irrigations scheme located within the service area of Vagarshapat WUA. H.Harutyunyan presented in details the proposed project and the nature of anticipated activities. N.Atayan presented environmental and social aspects of the anticipated works. The Executive Director of Vagarshapat WUA S.Sedrakyan explained participants how water delivery process within the under-command lands of Lower Hrazdan irrigation scheme, and in particular of Shah Aru canal is organized. He confirmed that the rehabilitation of deteriorated stretches of canals will improve water delivery efficiency and significantly reduce water loses. The Governors of communities located within under command area of Lower Hrazdan stage 1 canal participating in public consultations first thanked for inclusion of their communities into the rehabilitation deteriorated stretches of the canal. Meantime they asked to include as much labor force as possible from local population in anticipated civil works. The Institutional Reforms expert V.Movsisyan clarified that one of the Project’s objectives is to involve in civil works as much local population as possible to increase local employment. Local people will be hired if they posses required construction skills. The list of participants is attached. Executive Director of Vagarshapat WUA [SIGNATURE] S.Sedrakyan 63 Rehabilitation of Low Hrazdan Primary Canals List of participants of the Public Consultations “Vagharshapat� WUA. Low-Hrazdan Irrigation Scheme, Shah Aru Canal Date: 15.09.2011 No. Name of community Participants’ name Signature Position 1. Mrgastan R.Khachatryan [Signature] Head of the community 2. Tsakhkunk D.Karapetyan [Signature] Head of the community 3. Artamet Z.Mirzakhanyan [Signature] Head of the community Executive Director of “Vagharshapat� WUA [Signature] S.Sedrakyan 64