59945 ELECTRICITY OF VIETNAM TRUNG SON HYDROPOWER PROJECT CONSTRUCTION ­ OPERATION ROAD TRUNG SON HYDROPOWER PLANT REPORT ON Independent Resettlement Monitoring (Mission II) Monitored and reported by: Centre for Community Development Studies (CECODES) Independent Monitoring Organization -IMC Ha Noi, July 2010 Table of Contents Abbreviations.................................................................................................................... 2 Part I: Introduction.......................................................................................................... 3 1. Project introduction......................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Project Objectives ............................................................................................ 3 1.2 Project Main Components................................................................................. 4 2. Scope of Project Impacts................................................................................................ 4 3. Socio-economic Conditions of the Project Area............................................................. 6 4. Living conditions of the local people............................................................................ 7 5. Existing status of land use by affected households......................................................... 8 Part II. Objectives and Tasks of Independent Monitoring........................................... 8 1. Objective of Independent Monitoring............................................................................ 8 2. Specific tasks............................................................................................................. 8 2.1 Appraisal of Internal Monitoring Results........................................................... 8 2.2 Site Surveys........................................................................................................ 9 2.3 Preparation of Monitoring Report....................................................................... 9 Part III. Approach and Monitoring Methodology............................................. 9 1. Approach............................................................................................................ 9 2. Methodology................................................................................................................... 9 3. Monitoring methods........................................................................................................ 10 4. Arrangement for Implementation.................................................................................... 10 Part IV. Monitoring Results............................................................................................. 11 1. Appraisal of Internal Monitoring Reports and Compensation Plans.............................. 11 2. Results of Site Surveys................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Information Disclosure and Community Consultation....................................... 11 2.2 Inventory............................................................................................................. 13 2.3 Compensation Plans............................................................................................ 14 2.4 Compensation Payment...................................................................................... 17 2.5 Restoration of lives and livelihood..................................................................... 19 2.6 Resettlement and Land Clearance....................................................................... 20 2.7 Complaint Mechanism and Complaint Settlement............................................. 21 2.8 Satisfaction of the Affected People on Resettlement Implementation............... 22 3. Pending issues................................................................................................................ 22 Part V. Conclusions and Recommendations.................................................................. 23 1. Conclusions..................................................................................................................... 24 2. Recommendations........................................................................................................... 25 APPENDIX 27 Appendix 1: 27 Appendix 2: 40 Appendix 3: 47 Abbreviations BAH Being affected CP The Government EVN Vietnam Electricity IMC Independent Monitoring Committee ND Decree NN Agriculture PMU Project Management Unit RF Resettlement Framework RP Resettlement Plan TDC Resettlement PC People's Committee CECODES Centre for Community Support Development Studies FS Feasibility Study Part I. Introduction 1. The Centre for Community Support Development Studies (CECODES) is selected by the Project Management Unit (PMU) as the Independent Monitoring Consulting Agency (hereinafter referred to as IMC) to monitor independently resettlement implementation for the contract - Civil Works for Operation Road of Trung Son Hydropower Plant - under the Contract No. 04.1/2009/HDTV-TDTS-P2 signed on 20 February 2009 between CECODES and the Trung Son Hydropower Plant Project Management Unit of Vietnam Electricity (EVN). According to the Contract, CECODES shall provide two monitoring missions on resettlement implementation for the access road of Trung Son Hydropower Plant, from February 2009 to December 2010. In pursuance of actual progress of resettlement implementation, the PMU will mobilize the IMC at appropriate times. 2. The first monitoring mission was carried out by CECODES in August 2009 according to the mobilization letter ref. 953TDTS-P3 dated 28 July 2009 by the PMU. The first-mission monitoring report was submitted to the PMU and the World Bank. To prepare for construction of the road, the PMU mobilized IMC to provide the second monitoring mission to review resolution of outstanding issues from the previous mission and evaluate achievements of the project resettlement objectives. CECODES implemented the second monitoring mission for this road from 5 to 12 July 2010. Monitoring results are summarized and presented in this report with the following main contents: Part I introduces the Trung Son Hydropower Project and the Trung Son Hydropower Plant access-operation road; Part II presents objectives and terms of references for independent resettlement monitoring; Part III presents monitoring methodology; Part IV shows monitoring results; and Part V provides conclusions and some recommendations to finalize the project resettlement and compensation activities; and the report annexes come lastly. 1. Project Introduction 1.1 Project Objectives and Tasks 3. According to the Ma river master plan approved by the Ministry of Industry (the Ministry of Industry and Trade now) in Decision No. 1195/QD-NLDC dated 31/3/2005, Trung Son Hydropower Project will be constructed by the Ma river, at Ban Uon, Trung Son commune, Quan Hoa district, Thanh Hoa city and 195km from the Northwest of Thanh Hoa city. The basin area corresponding to the dam is about 13,175 m2 and the end of the lake is approximately 9.5km from the Vietnam ­ Laos border and within the territory of Vietnam. The project Feasibility Study (FS) was approved by the Vietnam Minister with Decision No. 865/TTg-CN. 4. Trung Son is a project of multi-objectives, of which the main objective is to develop the national electricity grid with a capacity of 260 MW. In addition, other tasks of the project are (i) Flood control at capacity of 112 million cubic meters for the downstream; (ii) Provision of irrigative water for the downstream of the Ma river and prevention of seawater penetration during the dry season. 5. The project is designed in accordance with Vietnam standard TCVN 285/2002 which is an application of national standards. The main project components consist of (i) a 88m high; (ii) a reservoir at the normal water supply level at 160m (the fourth alignment option) and the flood peak at the flood frequency of 100 years. The water dead level is 150m with a capacity of about 236,40 x 106 m3; (iii) a six-gate overflow and the dam level is 145m; (iv) power alignment (the water intake location and the water delivery pipe is 235.5m long at the diameter of 5.5m); (v) the plant operation house at the left of the dam with a capacity of 260 MW; (vi) access road to the dam, the overflow, the maintenance road; (vii) drainage channel at the length of 80m and the width of the channel base is 70m; (viii) a transmission line; and (ix) stone pits, and work camps for temporary accommodations during construction stage, etc. 1.2 Access ­ Operation Road 6. According to the FS (equivalent to the Investment Report), the construction-operation on the left side is the sole road connecting to the National Highway No. 15A (crossing the National Highway No. 15A at Co Lng T-junction). Materials and Plants (even superheavey and superlong ones) for construction of Trung Son Hydropower Project are all transported through this road. The road is called as Co Lng ­ Co Me road for short, including: (1) Co Lng bridge (at the beginning end of the road and connects with the National Highway No. 15A); (2) Co Me bridge (at the ending end of the road and is adjacent to the Plant construction site); and (3) the road connecting Co Lng bridge with Co Me bridge with the total length of 22km. 7. At present, this road is a very narrow earth road and it is difficult to pass through; without two bridges at the two ends, the road currently cannot meet requirements for transportation of materials and plants (especially superheavey and superlong plants). Therefore, construction of a new road and bridges is required for transportation purposes and to ensure the overall construction progress of Trung Son Hydropower Plant. 8. Construction of the road and two bridges will affect lives and production of the households along the road which passes through 12 villages of five communes, namely Trung Son, Thanh Son, Phu Thanh (Quan Hoa district, Thanh Hoa province), Mai Hich and Van Mai communes (Mai Chau district, Hoa Binh province). The PMU and the Resettlement Committees of Quan Hoa and Mai Chau districts have implemented detailed measurement surveys, development of compensation plans, compensation payment, land clearance and resettlement for affected households. 2. Scope of Impacts by the Road 2.1 Number of Affected Househods 9. According to data in the Resettlement Plan (RP) updated in May 2010, the total number of affected households is 486 households (HHs) with 1,954 people, of which there are 360 HHs in Quan Hoa district and 126 HHs in Mai Chau district affected by the road. 79 households are defined as severely affected (losing 25% of the total productive land area or more or have to resettle), of which 66 HHs have their houses affected and have to resettle, and 13 HHs have more than 25% productive land acquired. Table 1: Categorization of households affected by the road Province Number of affected households Severely affected Marginal Total No. of AHs & (to be resettled, lose >25% productive land) affected APs No. of to-be- No. of AH No. of AHs Total (losing <25% No. of No. of resettled with shops losing > 25% productive AHs AP AH* being productive land) affected* land Thanh Hoa 57 18 0 57 303 360 1446 Hoa Binh 9 2 13 22 104 126 508 Total 66 20 13 79 407 486 1954 Source: Data from detailed survey measurement carried out by the PMU and the Resettlement Committees. Note:* Some houses lose their houses, shops and productive land all together. 10. There are two ethnic moniroty groups affected by the road construction, namely the Thai group and the Muong group. The Thai group includes 263 households with 1,062 people; and the Muong group includes 98 households with 392 people. The number of affected Kinh households is 125 HHs with 500 people. More details are presented in Table 1. 2.2 Land area to be acquired 11. The total area of affected land is 58.2 ha, of which Quan Hoa district, Thanh Hoa province has 46.6ha affected, counting for 80.03%; and Mai Chau district, Hoa Binh province has 11.6 ha affected, counting for 19.97%. The area of permanently acquired land is 46.3ha, of which 31.5ha is agriculture land (including forest land planting Luong ­ a kind of bamboo); 6.2ha is residential land and garden land; and 8.6ha is unused land and land from acquired roads (without compensation). The area of temporary acquired land is 11.9ha, of which 10.0ha is agriculture land (including forest land), and 1.9ha is residential land and garden land. Table 2: Categorization of land affected by the road No Village/ types of acquired land Unit Permanent acquisition Temporary acquisition A MAI CHAU DISTRICT 89,457.4 25,204.1 1 Land for annual crops m² 12,802.4 4,764.60 2 Land for perennials m² 6,749.7 2,397.8 3 Residential land m² 4,190.2 1896.6 4 Garden land m² 18,247.7 7,655.20 Garden land adjacent to residential m² 5 land 17,360.1 0 6 Forestry land m² 30,107.4 8,489.90 7 Agriculture land for wet rice m² 0 0 B QUAN HOA DISTRICT 287,397.2 93,839.4 1 Land for perennials m² 3566.1 1744.9 2 Residential land m² 14,842.8 6,133.1 3 Garden land m² 6,202.5 3429.7 4 Aquaculture land m² 228.7 36.2 5 Forestry land m² 262,544.8 82,324.6 6 Agriculture land for wet rice m² 12.3 170.9 C Unused land and roads m² 86,000.0 0 D Total (A+B+C) 462.854,6 119,043.5 Source: Consolidation from the updated RAP 2.3 Other Affected Assets 12. Other affected assets of the HHs in both districts include 3,702m2 of housing with various types, of which Quan Hoa district has 3,109m2 of houses being affected (counting for 83.98%), and Mai Chau district has 593m2 of houses being affected (counting for 16.02%). In addition, 2,678m2 of auxiliary works (including kitchens, and bathroom) and 1,826m2 of fences and breeding facilities are affected by the project. 13. Total damages of trees in both districts (see more details in Table 3) are as follows: · Annual trees: 7,958 trees, of which Quan Hoa district losses 7,537 trees and Mai Chau district losses 421 trees. · Perennial trees, including trees for fruits, trees for wood and trees for shade: 15,341 trees, of which Quan Hoa district losses 13,271 trees, and Mai Chau district losses 2,050 trees. · Damaged number of Luong ­ a type of bamboo ­ is 117,353 trees, of which Quan Hoa losses 101,968 trees and Mai Chau district 15,386 trees. Table 3: Categorization of trees and crops affected by the road Trees No. Category Annual crops Perennials for Luong wood Unit m² trees m²/shade trees trees Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Total (I+II) 21,360.93 7,958 18,839.60 3,587 11,754 58,531 56,265 2,557 I Quan Hoa district 13,897.00 7,537 - 3,165 10,106 50,984 50,984 - 1 Trung Son commune 4,212.10 4,638 1,393 5,629 12,038 20,579 - 2 Phu Thanh commune 1,738.80 2,240 546 2,486 3,096 6,159 - 2 Thanh Son commune 7,946.10 659 1,226 1,991 17,371 24,246 - II Mai Chau district 7,463.93 421 18,839.60 422 1,648 7,547 5,281 2,557.00 1 Mai Hich district 3,900.73 14 7,992.70 134 989 3,828 2,862 1,260.00 2 Van Mai district 3,563.20 407 10,846.90 288 659 3,719 2,419 1,297.00 Source: Consolidation from RAP 3. Natural and socio-economic conditions of the project area 3.1 Natural conditions 14. The project area locates at mountainous communes at the Northwest of Hoa Binh province and the North of Thanh Hoa province. It is approximately 80km from Hoa Binh city, at the geographic co-ordinates of approximately 20024' to 20045' of the North latitude and 104031' to 105016' of the East longtitude. 15. Although the project communes locate at the mountainous areas of two provinces and are far from the provincial central areas, transportation is difficult, the project area plays an important role in socio-economic development of two provinces and it has a economic exchange market with the neighbor Son La province. Since the project area is at the gateway to the North West area, Trung Son Hydropower Plant, after completion, will bring up many advantages for socio-economic development in the area. 3.2 Population conditions 16. In the area of five communes affected by the road and bridges, there are 2,988 households with 13,130 people (statistic data in 2007) and the average household size is 4.4 persons. The annual natural population growth rate is 3%. This is a quite high rate in comparison to other localities of Thanh Hoa and Hoa Binh provinces. 17. Total labour in the area is 6,052 peopel (counting for 46% of total population), of which agriculture labour counts for about 98% and non-agriculture labour counts for 2%. This feature requires special attention when designing income and livelihood restoration options for affected people to ensure suitability with their jobs. 18. The main groups of people in the project area include the Thai, the Muong and the Kinh. They have been living here for a long time. Though each group of peole has its own cultural characters, all the groups always unite and help each other in life as well as in production. 3.3 Features of Affected Ethnic Minority Groups a) The Thai people 19. The Thai people reside mainly in provinces of Lai Chau, Son La, Hoa Binh, Thanh Hoa and Nghe An. The project area is a secular residence area of the Thai people, can be up to 400 - 500 years. Main family names used by the Thai are: Bc, B, Bua, Bun, Cà (Hà, Kha, Mào, Sa), Cm, Chu, Chiêu, èo, iu, Hà, Hoàng, Khm Leo, Lèo, Lm (Lâm, Lm), Lý, L (L, La), Lc, L, Lng (Lng), Manh, Mè, Nam, Nông, Ngn, Ngu, Nho, Nht, ng, Panh, Pha, Phia, Quàng (Hoàng, Vàng), Qu Sm, T, Tày, Tao (ào), T Vang, V o, (Vi), Xa (Sa), Xin... The Thai speak languages of the Thai-origin languages of the Thai ­ Kadai language system. 20. The Thai people are very experienced experiences in making weirs and small dams, digging canals and making suspended chutes to get water for irrigation. Paddy rice is the main food, particularly sticky rice. Thai people also cultivate rice, vegetables and other crops on terrain fields. In addition, they raise cattle, poultry, do handicrafts such as knitting, weaving brocades, and some of them make pottery. Well-known products of Thai are brocades with unique colorful patterns which are long-lasting and beautiful. These are typical features which need to be paid attention to when preparing the resettlement plan and designing a suitable livelihood restoration program for the affected Thai people. b) The Muong people 21. Mng people, also named Mol, Mual, Moi, Moi bi, Au t, Ao t, is an ethnic group living in mountainous area in northern part of Vietnam and they live most densely in Hoa M Binh province and mountainous districts of Thanh Hoa province. ng people live and cultivate permanently in areas where productive land is available, close to roads and convenient to work and travel. 22. Mng people are by tradition farmers and paddy rice is their main food crop. Significant secondary income of Muong families is exploiting forestry products such as agarics, cat's ear, bastard cardamom, sticklac, cinnamon, honey, timber, bamboo, rattan, etc. Typical handicrafts of Muong are weaving, knitting, reeling silkworms, etc. Many Muong women do weaving with quite sophisticated skills. 3.4 Family structures 23. Family structures of the ethnic minority people living in the construction area of the road and bridges have changed substantially. Though they are the Thai or the Muong family, nowadays, traditional families (extended family) with three or four generations, including several nuclear families living in the same house, do not exist anymore. There are many reasons for this, but it normally comes to the economic reasons first: now, land is managed and assigned by the State to households for land use. Therefore, by splitting a big family into several smaller families, there are chances for more land than living in an extended family. Moreover, by splitting into nuclear families, each household becomes more active and autonomic in developing their family economy than living dependently in an extended family. This is also an advantage in implementation of compensation, resettlement and restoration of livelihood for affected households because removal of and life restoration for a smaller family is much simple and easier than for a big family. 3.5 Relations among the Thai and the Muong and the Kinh 24. The Thai and the Muong people in the construction area of the road and bridges as well as in other areas in Vietnam have been living in harmony with the Kinh people. At the project communes, the Thai, the Muong and the Kinh residentially interlace and live in harmony with each other, exchange their productive experiences. In practice, there are no obstacles to getting married among these peoples with many marriages between men and women of different ethnic group. This reflects increasing integration among various peoples in the construction area of the road and bridges in particular and in the whole country in general. Despite of different custom and traditional practices, the people in the project area unite and help each other with no cultural or people conflicts. This is a favorable condition for resettlement arrangement and make it easier and quicker for reallocated people in integrating with the receiving community. 4. Living conditions of the local people 25. Generally, living conditions of the local people in communes of Mai Chau district (Hoa Binh province) are better than those in communes of Quan Hoa district (Thanh Hoa province). The national power grid has been provided to the households in affected communes in Mai Chau district, meanwhile, there is no national power grid in three communes of Quan Hoa district where some households are using power from home-made small-scale hydropower sources and other households use oil lamps for lighting. 26. Most of surveyed households have quite good houses on stilts, the rest have grade 3 or grade 4 houses. Most of households have water for domestic use from water gravity sources from the springs to the villages and few households used dug-well water. Approximately 60% of households have simple latrines made of bamboos, the rest of 40% households do not have latrines. 27. Main income is from food at an average of 338 kg per person per year. In addition, the households have other income sources from gardens, husbandry, and forestry, i.e., planting forests. Averagely, the income of each household is VND 6-15 million per year, of which VND 3-5 million per year is from agriculture and about VND 3-10 million per year is from forestry. Total number of poor households that are severely affected in five communes in the construction area of the road and bridges is 16 HHs (12 HHs in Thanh Hoa and 4 HHs in Hoa Binh), of which 15 HHs have to resettle and one household loss more than 20% of productive land. Monitoring results (interview and observation) show that there are no significant economic differences between the ethnic minority people and the Kinh people who are affected by construction of the road and bridges. 5. Existing land use of affected households 28. Land acquired from households include residential land (housing land and garden land), agriculture land for annual crops and perennials, aquaculture land and forestry land. Most of affected households have land use right certificate (the red paper). Land disputes among the households or invasion of public land are very rare. There is no land transaction or speculation because the communes are in mountainous and remote areas. Therefore, there is no land price fluctuation in the project area. This makes it easy for application of land compensation prices. Part II. OBJECTIVES AND TASKS OF INDEPENDENT MONITORING 1. Objectives of independent monitoring 29. Main objectives of independent monitoring of the Project compensation and resettlement implementation are: (i) Verifying internal monitoring results; (ii) Checking implementation of actual compensation and resettlement to examine whether the project RP policies are complied with or not and whether the project affected households' lives are restored to equal or better levels than before project; (ii) Evaluating efficiency, impacts and stability of resettlement activities; (iv) Recommending necessary adjustments for implementation of resettlement for the successive components of the Project. 30. The objective of this monitoring mission is to review how far the outstanding issues indicated in the first-monitoring report have been resolved, what issues have been incurred and whether they have been settled or not. Also, this monitoring mission aims at evaluating achievements of the project resettlement objectives set in the RP and satisfaction of conditions of compensation and resettlement prior to construction of the road. Detailed objectives are: (i) Reviewing settlement of the outstanding issues in the previous monitoring and problems incurred during implementation of compensation and resettlement after the first monitoring mission; (ii) Assessing achievements of the RP objectives, including satisfaction of the affected people on compensation, allowances, restoration of livelihood and complaint and grievance settlement; levels of restoration and stabilization of livelihood and productive activities of the affected people, especially of the severely affected people and of resettled households; (iii) Evaluating levels of satisfaction of conditions of compensation and resettlement prior to construction of the road. 2. Specific tasks 2.1 Appraisal of internal monitoring results 31. Review internal monitoring reports, appraise additional compensation plans and the Project relevant documents to check whether implementation of the project resettlement fits the objectives, requirements and tasks shown in the project updated RP or not. These documents are provided by the PMU and the district Resettlement Committees. 2.2 Site surveys 32. Checking the delivery of inventory minutes to the affected households as required in the first-monitoring report; pay the remaining compensation and allowances for affected households; displacing the people and clear the site; measures for restoration of livelihood for affected households; resolving complaints and grievances of affected households on allowances for displacement of graves; assisting the poor households that have to resettle; resolve incurred problems. 33. Evaluate whether the RP objectives have been achieved or not, especially restoration of livelihood, incomes and living conditions of the severely affected people. Evaluate satisfaction of the affected people on compensation and resettlement, difficulties and medial actions during restoration of livelihood that the affected households encounter. 2.3 Preparation of report on monitoring results 34. Data and information collected from site surveys are processed and stored in the resettlement database. The Consultant prepares a full report on results of monitoring implementation of compensation and resettlement and recommended solutions for remaining issues and for completion of the project resettlement prior to construction of the road by the end of 2010. Part III. APPROACH AND MONITORING METHODOLOGY 1. Approach 35. The participatory approach is applied in resettlement monitoring. Accordingly, the affected people participate in the monitoring process through interview, group discussions, visiting the affected areas with the monitoring specialists, etc. Representatives of the PMU, the district Resettlement Committees, the people's committees of affected communes also participate in monitoring process by answering interview and joining group discussions with the monitoring specialists. 2. Monitoring methodology 36. Basing on the objectives of this monitoring mission, IMC does not apply quantitative survey method (interviews with questionnaires) but apply participatory assessment (individual interviews, group discussions). The surveyed subjects are all severely affected people (losing 25% productive land or more and/ or have to resettle) and 20% of marginally affected households. In addition, IMC carry out individual interviews with the resettlement staff of the PMU, of Quan Hoa and Mai Chau district Resettlement Committees and the leaders of five communes. IMC prepares guidelines on individual interviews and group discussions by topics to collect information. Results of appraising internal monitoring documents and reports were checked against the site monitoring surveys. 3. Arrangement for implementation 37. In accordance with the Correspondence ref. 303/TDTS-P3 dated 30 June 2010 on mobilization of monitoring specialists by the PMU, IMC sent a Monitoring Team, including a Team Leader, to implement monitoring tasks. Preparation for this monitoring mission was made right upon receipt of the PMU's mobilization letter. At IMC office, the specialist of the monitoring Team prepared monitoring tools, including guidelines on in-depth interview and group discussions, reviewed the updated RP and documents relating to the project compensation. Site monitoring started on 5 July 2009. 38. According to the updated RP May 2010, the entire road has 66 severely affected households out of 486 AHs. With such information, IMC worked with the communes people's committees and leaders of villages/ hamlets to invite 66 severely AHs and 95 marginally AHs (20%) to participate in group discussions and individual interview. IMC monitoring specialists organized 15 group discussions with APs in 15 villages/hamlets with a total number of 158 participants; interviews with five people's committee leaders of five affected communes and with some heads of the villages/ hamlets to collect necessary information. Moreover, the Monitoring Team checked at sites reallocation of the displaced households, removal of graves into commune cemeteries, visited and discussed with Ms. Toan's household (who had not received payment due to pending complaints on allocation of land for resettlement) to understand the requirements and expectation of her family. 39. After completing site monitoring, the Monitoring Team, with assistance of the Office team, quickly consolidated site monitoring results and organized a meeting with the PMU to discuss on comments and ideas raised by the affected people. At this meeting, the Team Leader presented complaints and comments of the affected people and outstanding issues to be settled (see more details in the Section "Outstanding issues"). Part IV. MONITORING RESULTS 1. Appraisal of internal monitoring reports 40. The PMU cooperates with the Resettlement Committees of Mai Chau and Quan Hoa districts implementing resettlement for this road. Generally, the resettlement procedures have been implemented as stipulated in Decree No. 84/2007/ND-CP and the project RP. Data of detailed measurement surveys, inventory and compensation are stored at the district Resettlement Committees, and at the PMU in forms of documents and computer data. Inventory minutes have sufficient signatures of the participants and heads of the households and each household has a copy of the minute after the IMC's comments in the previous monitoring mission have been taken into consideration. Compensation options are prepared in details for each AH and approved by Quan Hoa and Mai Chau district people's committees (these decisions are attached in this report). 41. The PMU has established a Department of compensation and resettlement to co- operate with the district Resettlement Committees implementing compensation and land clearance activities for the project. The Department of compensation and resettlement always have its staff at the PMU's office in Mai Chau town to receive and respond to the affected people's queries. By doing this, the PMU has been active in compensation and land clearance, and resolve the AP's queries or complaints timely. 2. Results of site monitoring 2.1 Information dissemination and community consultation 42. In the first monitoring mission, IMC pointed out some limitations in information disclosure and community consultation, for example, information disclosure time was limited. one-way information dissemination, the project information and policies were disclosured verbally. To overcome these limits, the PMU and the Resettlement Committees of Quan Hoa and Mai Chau districts have co-operated with the people's committees and the community organizations of the affected communes to encourage the AHs to follow decisions by the provincial/district people's committees on handing over the sites to the Resettlement Committees upon receipt of full compensation and allowances. On the other hand, the PMU have summarized compensation and allowance policies and the complaint and grievance settlement mechanism in leaflets to deliver to the AHs. The leaflets are attached with the compensation payment log-books and the Inventory Minutes of the affected HHs (see photos). Entitlements and compensation payment log-book 43. By doing this, the affected people have been clear about the project compensation policies and allowances that they are entitled to. Most of AHs handed over the sites for the district Resettlement Committees upon full receipt of compensation and allowances. Results of group discussions with the affected people show that they do not have any complaints or grievance about compensation made by the Resettlement Committees and really look forward to early construction so that they can enjoy the project benefits. Many AHs in Quan Hoa district feel regret that construction has not been commenced for the project but they have been required to cut down all Luong trees to hand over the sites. If they were allowed to reap the trees until one or two months prior to construction, they could have had two more crops of sprouts or one crop of Luong trees to increase their family incomes. 2.2 Inventory of affected assets 44. In the first monitoring mission, it was verified that inventory of the AHs' assets had been completed. However, there were some complaints by the affected people on unprecise inventory and detailed measurement surveys or wrong determination of the origin of their land. These complaints were lodged to the PMU and Resettlement Committees and presented in the first-monitoring Report. In this monitoring time, all aforesaid complaints have been settled and accepted by the affected people. 45. There are some newly encountered cases, including 15 graves that need to be displaced because at the inventory time, the owners of these graves were working far away and could not list their assets; some affected households in Choi hamlet, Mai Hich commune petition that land for construction of the hamlet kindergarten (which is affected by the project) is purchased by their own money, not public land, hence, land compensation (the asset on land has been compensated for) should be provided. The Resettlement Committee requires them to prove the origin of the land, however, they can only provide a photo of an assignment paper in hand-writing without verification for a copy of the original assignment by the authority, the Resettlement Committee do not have any basis to settle their petition. 46. For the graves that had to be displaced, the Resettlement Committee has prepared additional plan and submitted to the district people's committee for approval and payment will be made in August. Regarding to land for construction of the kindergarten in Choi hamlet, the IMC requests the PMU and the Resettlement Committee, in cooperation with Mai Hich commune people's committee, to verify again the origin of this land plot. According to the land assignment paper (in hand writing in 2000), verification should be started with Mr. Phm Vn Thun ­ the assigner and Mai Hoang Son Co-operative ­ the assignee. Further verification might be made with Mr. Thuan's neighbors for origin of the land. Compensation for the on-land assets have been paid to the Co-operative, and for the land, if it is verified and confirmed by the local authority about the origin of this plot of land that the land is purchased by the aforesaid households with their own money, not from the state budget, from an eligible land user, compensation will be provided. For the relating households, they should nominate a representative to work with the relevant agents and to receive compensation on behalf of them (if any). 47. The PMU also delivered Mintues of inventory of affected assets to the AHs right after the ICM requested in the first monitoring mission. However, many AHs considered that compensation payment had been completed, there was no need to keep these inventory minutes. Therefore, when the Monitoring team requested them to show the Inventory minutes, many households did not have any (in Choi hamlet, Mai Hich commune), meanwhile, in some other communes, the affected people still kept these minutes. It should be noted that the Inventory Minutes are not only papers but also documents for comparison when there are disputes between the contractor and the land users during the construction phase when the contractor appropriates land that is out of the land-clearance markers. Asset Inventory Minutes 2.3 Compensation plans 48. Compensation plans have been developed based on legal documents of the States and Decisions of Thanh Hoa and Hoa Binh provincial people's committees on compensation, resettlement and resettlement plans for the construction ­ operation road of Trung Son Hydropower Project, including: - Law on Land 2003. - Decree No. 197/2004/ND-CP on compensation, allowances and resettlement when the State acquires land. - Decree No. 17/2006/ND-CP on supplementing and amending some articles of Decrees Nos. 181, 182, 197 and 198. - Decision No. 603/QD-EVN dated 4 August 2009 by Vietnam Electricity on approval of Preliminary Design for the Construction ­ Operation Road of Trung Son Hydropower Plant under the Trung Son Hydropower Project, Thanh Hoa province. - Decision No. 1048/QD-UBND dated 22 April 2008 by Thanh Hoa Provincial People's Committee on Issuance of compensation unit prices for assets affected due to land clearance in Thanh Hoa province. - Decision No. 16/2009/QD-UBND dated 24 March 2009 by Hoa Binh Provincial People's Committee on replacement of Decision No. 23/2008/QD-UBND dated 9 September 2008 on issuance of "compensation unit prices for affected assets when the State acquires land" in Hoa Binh province and Decision No. 27/2008/QD- UBND dated 06 October 2008 by Hoa Binh Provincial People's Committee on suppementing and amending some regulations issued with Decision No. 23/2008/QD-UBND dated 09 September 2008 by Hoa Binh Provincial People's Committee. - Decision No. 205/QD-UBND dated 21 April 2008 by the Chairman of Quan Hoa district people's committee, Thanh Hoa province, on establishment of the Resettlement Committee for Trung Son Hydropower Plant Project. - Decision No. 263/QD-UBND dated 22 April 2008 by the Chairman of Mai Chau district people's committee, Hoa Binh province, on establishment of the Resettlement Committee for Trung Son Hydropower Plant Project. - Policies stipulated in the updated RP for the construction-operation road of Trung Son Hydropower Plant. 49. Since the first monitoring mission in August 2009, there have been three compensation and allowance plans for affected households approved by Quan Hoa and Mai Chau district people's committees, including: Decision No. 773/QD-UB dated 4 September 2009 and Decision No. 1144/QD-UB dated 9 November 2009 by Quan Hoa district people's committee; Decision No. 813/QD-UB dated 8 October 2009 by Mai Chau district people's committee. Compensation prices for land and other assets applied in these plans are not different from previous plans and accepted by the affected people. Three allowances are added in these plans: allowance for removal of graves is VND 900,000/grave more, increasing the allowance up to VND 1,700,000/grave instead of VND 800,000/grave as before; allowance for life settlement and vocational training for 13 households who are determined to lose more than 25% of productive land; and an allowance of VND 100,000/HH for business households who do not have business registration. All the affected people are satisfied with these allowances (see Table 5). 50. In the first-monitoring Report, IMC requested allowances for the poor households who have their land acquired in accordance with the moral aims of Decree No. 17/2006/ND-CP. However, in this monitoring mission, it is found out that only poor households that are severely affected by the project (have to reallocate or lose 25% of productive land or more) are provided an allowance of VND 900,000/person/year for an period of six years. IMC have discussed this issue with the PMU to find out the reasons why this allowance is not provided for all affected poor households. According to the PMU, the existing RP of the road has been approved by Thanh Hoa and Hoa Binh provincial people's committees and there are no comments or complaints about allowances for poor households during various consultation missions implemented by the project. On the other hand, compensation plans have also been approved by Quan Hoa and Mai Chau district people's committees. According to the decisions by Thanh Hoa provincial people's committee in 2008 and 2009 on allowance mechanism when the State acquires land, there are no provisions on allowance mechanism for the poor, meanwhile Decree No. 17/2006/ND-CP regulates this kind of allowance and has been effective since 2006; and in Hoa Binh province, there were provisions on allowances for the poor households in 2008 but not in 2009. Therefore, the PMU suggests that the allowance mechanism indicated in the RP should be maintained and they will provide second-mission allowances for the five years remaining. 51. According to IMC, there are two solutions for this issue: The first option, the PMU and the Resettlement Committees still proceed procedures for allowances for the affected poor households. It is unnecessary to make payment prior to construction because compensation and other allowances have been provided, and this allowance is to help the households improving their livelihood to get out of their being poor; The seond option, if it is difficult to implement the first option, it might be considered to include the poor households affected by the road in the Allowance and Livelihood Restoration Program of the main project. According to the RP updated in May 2010, total number of the poor households of the whole project is 71 HHs, of which 16 HHs who have to be displaced have received special allowances. 52. The Consultant have reviewed compensation plans and collected information from the affected people and the heads of the villages/ hamlets to determine there are any cases depreciation or deduction of compensation amounts for houses/ architectual items constructed on land that is not fully eligible for compensation. The survey results show that there are no cases of deduction. All houses/ architectual items are compensated at replacement prices for house renewal. 2.4 Compensation payment 53. Compensation payment for affected households are implemented in many missions, i.e four missions in Quan Hoa district and four missions in Mai Chau district of which payment has been completed for three missions and the fourth mission will be made in August. Monitoring results indicate that all affected people are informed about dates, time and venues for compensation payment. Payment has been implemented quickly with simple and favorable procedures for the affected people. Each AH is provided a compenasation monitoring log- book by mission, in which it is stated clearly allowances and compensation amounts. 54. However, the affected people complain that payment in various missions makes it difficult for them in establishing new housing and restoring their lives, especially for households that have to resettle and households that receive limited compensation. As explained by the PMU and the Resettlement Committees, payment is provide in various missions to avoid risks to the local people because in some other projects, many ethnic minority households, after receiving compensation, use money for other purposes and not move their houses to new places to hand over the sites. As of the monitoring time, only two households have not received compensation with the total amount of VND 516,719,000, of which one household is complaining about land compensation and refuses to receive money and the other household has agreed to receive money and will be paid by the end of July 2010. 55. Regarding to compensation payment for poor households that are severely affected, IMC advises as follows: At present, the PMU and the Resettlement Committees prepare plans for allowances for poor households by years, accordingly, allowances ared provided by years within six years. According to IMC, these allowances are to help the severely affected poor households to get rid of being poor, if payment is made by years, the amount that each household receive is little (VND 3,600,000/HH of 4 people in average) and will not be enough for them to invest in improvement of their livelihood. If this allowance is paid once, the amount that each household receive (VND 20,400,000/HH of 4 people in average) migh be enough for them to invest in production or business to improve their incomes. Therefore, the more people a household have, the more money they receive. During group discussion with the severely affected poor people, IMC have raised this issue for discussion. According to the affected people, the allowance amounts they received in 2009 only helped them with daily expenses, but not for improvement of their livelihood and incomes. If such allowance mechanism is provided, they cannot get rid of being poor. Hence, they want to receive all allowances in one time. IMC discusses this issue with the PMU and it is agreed that the PMU will work with the district people's committees to prepare allowance plans and provide one- time payment for the affected households in 2010. Payment log book of AH Table 5: Numbers of HHs having received compensation and compensation amounts as of 30 June 2010 Unit: VND No. Affected No. of AHs No. of AHs Approved Paid amount Residual district having compensation amount received amount compensation Mai Chau 126 125 5,355,362,000 4,663,911,000 691,450,000 Quan Hoa 360 359 7,934,174,000 7,895,914,000 38,260,000 Total 486 480 13,289,536,000 12,559,825,000 729,710,000 Source: Data provided by the PMU 56. The total approved budget for compensation and allowances is VND 13,289,536,000, of which VND 5,355,362,000 is for Mai Chau district and VND 7,934,174,000 is for Quan Hoa district. The total compensation amount has been paid as of the monitoring time is VND 12,559,825,000. The residual amount that needs to be paid for two households is VND 516,719,000, of which VND 288,345,000 is for Ms. Toan's household and VND 228,374,000 is for Mr. Cu's household. The Resettlement Committees of Mai Chau district and the PMU have been successful in persuading Mr. Cu in Thanh Mai hamlet to receive money for compensation and allowance and it is planned that payment will be made in August 2010. At present, the PMU and the Resettlement Committee are preparing an allowance plan for removal of 15 graves that are newly encountered for payment in the last mission. 2.5 Restoration of the affected people's lives and livelihood 57. Apart from providing compensation for affected land and on-land assets, the PMU and the Resettlement Committees also apply many allowances for the severely affected households to help them promptly settle down their lives and restore their incomes. Because of no economic differences between the ethnic minority people and the Kinh people in the project area, there is no special allowance policy for the ethnic minority people. Out of 486 HHs affected by the project, there are 79 severely affected HHs of which 66 HHs have to resettle and 13 HHs (in Mai Chau) are defined as losing more than 25% of productive land. The number of poor HHs that are severely affected is 16 HHs. The PMU and the Resettlement Committees have prepared compensation plans in which allowances stipulated in the RP are added and payment has been made to these households (see Table 6). 58. Allowances in cash for restoration of lives and production for the AHs are just a temporary measure and not stable because limited allowances are not enough for the AHs to invest in production. On the other hand, it is not easy to provide vocational training for the AHs at the working age because of different education levels and training demands among various AHs. Therefore, it is essential to organize training courses on cultivation or breeding skills fir the severely affected HHs to help them increase the productivity in the remaining land, improve their incomes and stabilize their lives. 59. IMC specialists have discussed with the leaders of the people's committees of five affected communes to learn about the applicable agriculture promotion programs and potential participation of the affected people in these programs. The discussion results show that the communes often organize training courses on cultivation and breeding skill for farmers with the assistance of the district agriculture promotion centers or other organizations. All local people can attend these courses which are: training courses on cultivating skills for new rice varieties, bitter melons, and raising African carp in Van Mai commune; cultivating skills for planting Luong trees trees and breeding highly productive hens in Mai Hich commune; cultivating skills for planting acacia, raising cows for meat in Thanh Son commune; allowances with seeds of plants and vegetables for affected households in Trung Son commune; skills for porcupine breeding and planting trees in sloping land in Phu Thanh commune. The leaders of these communes report that special attention are paid to the affected people in general and the severely affected in particular to help them quickly restore their lives, production and incomes by providing them with chances of participating in agriculture promotion programs and receiving loans for production development. Nevertheless, according to these leaders, in order to apply the skills they learn in training courses successfully, the households need frequent assistance and guidance from the technicians of agriculture promotion centres and loans at low interest rates. Table 6: Allowances for the severely affected people No. Allowance Subjects for allowances Allowance level (VND) Implementation 30% of one-year income (after tax) at the average income of the last No HHs are Allowance for loss HHs that have business three years of HHs that have eligible for this 1 of income from registration business registration. allowance business/ services HHs that do not have business registration VND 100,000/HH Paid One-time allowance that is equivalent to 30kg of rice per person per month for three months. HHs that lose more than Allowance for changing of 2 Allowance for 25% of total agriculture occupations, VND 3,000,000 per living settlement land area person Paid HHs that have to resettle receive allowances in cash with an amount equivalent to 30kg of rice per HHs that have to resettle person per month x 6 months Paid Allowance for poor Poor HHs that have to VND 900,000/person/year. Paid for the first 3 households resettle Allowance for six years year Two HHs have not met required conditinos for allowances. The Allowance for base At actual certified amounts but not issue is being 4 levelling HHs that have to resettle exceeding VND 7,000,000/HH settled. Displacement within the One HH has not province VND 3,000,000/HH received Allowance for Displacement out of the 5 removal of housing province VND 5,000,000/HH Paid VND 1,700,000/grave for graves that are 36 months old, at the Paid for the first inventory time, but not have been and the second reintered; missions. Have VND 3,600,000/grave for graves not paid for 15 Allowance for HHs that have graves to that are <36 months old at the newly incurred 6 removal of graves be displaced inventory time. graves Source: The PMU 2.6 Resettlement and land clearance 60. All households that have to move their houses in both affected districts choose on-site resettlement to enjoy the project benefits and to protect their lives from being in disorder. This option also helps them to reduce costs for settling new housing and quickly stabilize their lives. 61. At the monitoring time, 65 out of 66 HHs that have to resettle have handed over the sites to the Resettlement Committees and moved to new living area, of which 55 out of 57 HHs in Quan Hoa district have constructed new houses and stablized their new housing, two HHs have leveled the bases and going to construct their new houses (these two households, after receiving compensation, went away for business and only came back in June 2010 to construct new houses); 8 out of 9 HHs in Mai Chau district has handed over the sites and moved, only one household has not received compensation and handed over the land because he has not agreed with the resettlement plan provided by the Resettlement Committee (see more details in section 2.7). The marginally affected households have harvested their crops and cut down trees to hand over the sites to the Resettlement Committees. 62. Removal of graves of households in Po, Ching, Co Me, Xc vilages (Trung Son commune) and Uôn village (Phu Thanh commune) has been dealt with. The Resettlement Committee has increased the allowance amount for grave displacment up to VND 1,700,000/grave as requested by the affected people for graves that are 36 months old, at the inventory time ,but not been reintered yet, and payment has been made, except for 15 newly incurred graves. All households have moved the graves into the commune cementaries and handed over the sites for the project. Newly constructed houses of the resettled HHs 63. Generally, land clearance for the road has been completed subtantially, and the construction site is ready. However, one household (Mrs. Toan) at the beginning of Co Luong road has not handed the site. This household has all land and house acquired and have to resettle. The PMU and the Resettlement Committee have provided a plot of land near the current housing area for resettlement for this household (at a distance of approximately 100m) but this household does not agree with the compensation land area, hence, refusing to receive the land plot. If this household does not hand over the site, it will be impossible to construct the beginning section of the road and Co Luong bridge. Mrs. Toan's complaint has been being processed for nearly one year but no resolutions have been reached (see more details in section 2.7). 2.7 Complaints and complaint settlement 64. At the monitoring time, complaints by the affected people on unprecise inventory of affected assets, allowances for base levelling, removal of graves, compensation prices, etc. (these are presented in the first-monitoring report) have been settled by the PMU, the district Resettlement Committees and the relating authorities. However, during group discussions in Nam Dien hamlet, Van Mai commune (Mai Chau district), it is reported by the affected people that there are 15 households had more than 25% of productive land acquired but not be verified by the Resettlement Committee. IMC discusses this issue with the PMU and is informed that the PMU and the Resettlement Committee of Mai Chau district verified the existing areas of productive land as listed by these households through minutes with Van Mai commune people's committee and the district Office of Natural Resources and Environment (the land management agency). The results showed that complaints by these 15 households were not right. IMC requests the PMU and the Resettlement Committee to inform in writing to the affected households about these results. 65. Some households in Choi hamlet, Mai Hich commune report that at present, they have water delivery pipeline from the spring to their houses for domestic water and this water pipeline crosses under the road that will be constructed. These households request the PMU to provide some measures to ensure safety of this pipeline during construction of the road. 66. Regarding to the complaint of Mrs. Toan's household: It has taken the PMU, the Resettlement Committee of Mai Chau district and the authorities at various levels a lot of time to resolve this case but Mrs. Toan's family has not satisfied. The IMC specialist has also discussed directly with Mrs. Toan and her children to learn about their requirements and visited the existing land area where Mrs. Toan is staying at and the land area that the district people's committee will provide for resettlement. The results of discussion with Mrs. Toan's family are summarized below: (i) Mrs. Toan's family is living at a plot of land of 33m long along the National Highway No. 15A, Co Lng town. According to technical design, the beginning end of Co Luong road will start from Mrs. Toan's houses. The total area acquired from her family is 877.9m2 (according to Decision No. 391/QD-UBND dated 10 June 2010 by Mai Chau district people's committee), of which 400m2 is residential land and 477.9m2 is garden land. The remaining area consists of two plots of land of 97.1m2 and 204.2m2 locating at two sides of the road but these plots are trapezoind-shaped and it is difficult to construction houses. (ii) Resettlement option for Mrs. Toan's household: As requested by this family, since they could not find a plot of land for resettlement, the Resettlement Committee of Mai Chau district and the PMU were required to arrange resettlement for this household right in Co Luong area at a similar location. Due to limited land sources at the locality, it was very difficult to meet this demand. However, after reviewing the land use plan and the local land sources for Co Luong town, on 24 March 2009, Mai Chau district people's committee in cooperation with the PMU of Trung Son Hydropower Project worked with Hoa Binh Arts and Crafts Joint Stock Company to ask the Company to return the land area that was currently rented by the company for a goods shop at Thanh Mai hamlet, Van Mai commune so that the Resettlement Committee of Mai Chau district could arrange resettlement for Mrs. Toan's household. The shop area was 172.3m2 (with a length of 19m along the National Highway 15A), aproximately 100m from Mrs. Toan's house. To have a sufficient area for housing and garden for Mrs. Toan's household, apart from the shop area returned by Hoa Binh Arts and Crafts company, the Resettlement Committee of Mai Chau district prepared a plan to acquire more land of some households behind the shop and submitted to Hoa Binh provincial people's committee for approval. On 26 March 2010, Hoa Binh provincial people's committee issued Decision No. 419/QD-UBND on acquisition and assignment of land for Mai Chau district people's committee for resettlement and land clearance for construction of the construction ­ operation road of Trung Son Hydpropower Plant with a total area of 1944.4m2, including: 172.3m2 of land from Hoa Binh Arts and Crafts Company; 158m2 of forest land of Mr. Nguyen Duc Viet (behind the shop); 1614.1m2 (behind the shop) of land assigned by the commune people's committee to Mrs. Dao Thi Thuong for forest planting. To ensure acquisition of land behind the shop, the Resettlement Committee organized a meeting with relating households to come to an agreement on a land arrangement plan as follows: Mrs. Nguyen Thi Toan would be provided with one plot of residential land of 10m long along the National Highway No. 15A and 40m wide, and the garden area would be 1,544.4m2 adjacent to the residential land and running along the Co Luong ­ Co Me road which was approximately 30m behind Mrs. Toan's house (this land area, after completion of the road, could be provided as additional land); of the remaining 9m long of the shop area, 7m would be provided for Mr. Viet's household (garden land of this household was acquired to provided for Mrs. Toan) and 2m long would be provided for Mr. Cu's household to make a safety lobby for the petrol station. This option was agreed by the Resettlement Committee of Mai Chau district and by the relating parties through a meeting minute with all signatures on 22 April 2009 (this meeting minute was agreed and signed by Mrs. Toan). (iii) It was estimated by the Resettlement Committee that expenses for base levelling for Mrs. Toan's households would be VND 334,771,000 (meanwhile the resettled households in rural areas could only receive a maximum amount of VND 7,000,000/HH for base levelling). If Mrs. Toan's household themselve made base leveling, the district compensation commtitee would pay for these costs, if not, base levelling would be implemented by the Resettlement Committee and handed over to the head of the household. At present, the Resettlement Committee has completed procedures for selection of a Consulting agent for design of base levelling and submited to the district people's committee for approval. However, at the time the IMC works with this household, Mrs. Toan's family does not agree with this resettlement plan and requests to receive full compensation with 33m of road-front land, of which 19m length of the land acquired from Hoa Binh Arts and Crafts Company and 14m length of the land running along Co Lng-Co Me road behind her house. (iv) The reasons why Mrs. Toan's household does not agree with the resettlement plan suggested by the Resettlement Committee: Mrs. Toan says that the acquired land of her family have been divided for her four sons, hence, she requires to be compensated with a similar plot of land that is sufficient for her four sons. Mrs. Toan also says that her family has two family record books (i.e. two households living in the same house) and two red papers for land use right but the Resettlement Committee only provides compensation and allowances for one household. (v) IMC's comments on this issue are as follows: during discussion with Mrs. Toan's household, the IMC specialist explained to her that it is very difficult to meet the requirement of her family when a similar plot of land (at the front the National Highway No. 15A) is not available. If her family have two households (with two family record books and two red papers for land use right), they can receive compensation with two plots of land with the 6m x 25m in accordance with the local standard and regulations for land on the National Highway No. 15A provided she has to prove that the second family record book and red paper are detached before the project cut-off date (at present, Mrs. Toan only showed one red paper to the district Resettlement Committee). After reviewing Mrs. Toan's demand and site visit, the IMC specialist proposes the below land arrangement plan for Mrs. Toan's familiy and Mrs. Toan's family considers this as an acceptable option: - Consider to revise scope of acquisition so that the remaining land area of Mrs. Toan was sufficient for a housing plot of land - Providing a plot of land at the dimensions 12m x 25m (12m at the front of the National Highway No. 15A, and 25m deep instead of 40m deep as planned first) as compensation at the shop area of the Arts and Crafts Company. With these dimensions, Mrs. Toan's household will have a total length of 18m at the front of National Highway No. 15A. - The garden land will be provided as in the selected plan, or will be compensated in cash if Mrs. Toan's family wants so. (vi) To implement the above option, IMC discusses with the PMU and requests the PMU to work with the Compensation comittee and the people's committee of Mai Chau district to consider and add more land arrangement options for Mrs. Toan's households. Details are as follows: - The Resettlement Committee of Mai Chau district and the PMU will negotiate with Mr. Viet to take 2m out of 7m of the front-road land at the National Highway No. 15A in the compensation option for Mr. Viet to assign to Mrs. Toan for a full of 12m of front-road land. Mr. Viet already had an opposite house in the compensation land for his previous garden which had been acquired for Mrs. Toan's household. As such, Mrs. Toan will receive a plot of land 12m x 25m instead of 10m x 40m as in the previous plan. - The Resettlement Committee of Mai Chau district and the PMU will negotiate with Mr. Cu's household (adjacent to Mrs. Toan's house) to acquire an additional plot of land adjacent to Mrs. Toan's house for Mrs. Toan so that her remaining plot of land will be in square-shaped for housing and her remaining land area at the old position will have 6m long at the front of the National Highway No. 15A. In return, Mr. Cu will be compensated with 2m long at the National Highway No. 15A which is next to the compensation plot of land for Mrs. Toan to ensure a safety lobby for the petrol station (see the illustration). Plot of land with 2m of the The plot of land with 12m The plot of land area Mr. Cu's house front-road front-road for compensation land with 5m needs to land for for Mrs. Toan's household front-road for be compensation compensation assigned for Mr. Cu for Mr. Viet Co Luong ­ Co Me road by Mr. Cu Mrs. Toan's remaining land area (97.1m2) 12 m 6m THE FRONT OF THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY NO. 15A 67. IMC requests the PMU to promptly cooperate with the district Resettlement Committee to organize a meeting with relevant authorities of Mai Chau district and with participation of the heads of the relating households to review this resettlement option. On the other hand, the authority and the local social organizations should persuade Mrs. Toan's household and the relating households to follow the plan for the common benefits of the whole community. According to IMC, this option compromises benefits of all relating parties and Mrs. Toan's household will have more benefits. 2.9 Satisfaction of the affected people 68. The affected people are all aware of the importance and benefits of the Construction ­ Operation Road of Trung Son Hydropower Plant. They consider that after completion of this road, the local people will have more favorable conditions for economic and cultural exchanges with the lowland areas, their agriculture products can be sold at higher prices than those currently squeezed by the private merchants. In particular, after completion of the hydropower plant, the communes in the project area will have power from the national grid which satisfies their desires of thousand years. Therefore, the affected people as well as unaffected people support the project. They request the PMU to commence construction of the road soon. 69. Results of evaluation of the affected people's satisfaction on compensation, allowances and resettlement show that most of affected people feel satisfied with the project compensation policies. Although there are some deficiencies during implementation, after receiving complaints and grievances by the APs, the PMU, the Resettlement Committees and the local authorities at various levels have been actively in finding solutions to ensure the benefits of the APs. 70. Results of the site surveys also show that most of resettled HHs have constructed new houses in the remaining land and their lives are being stabilized. Compensation and allowances are sufficient for the AHs to establish their new housing at better conditions than in the old housing. Since no households lose all productive land, transition of jobs is not required. The HHs that lose more than 25% of productive land receive occupational allowance with an amount of VND 3,000,000/person. However, it is a difficult issue for these household to choose a vocational training which can be applied in their localities. Therefore, most of households have invested these allowances in production in the remaining land or invest in husbandry. 3. Outstanding issues 71. As mentioned above, the current outstanding issue that required completed treatment is Mrs. Toan's case. Moreover, some other mentioned issues are verification of some complaints for clear information to the complainants, including determining the origin of land for the kindergarten in Choi hamlet and 15 households that lose more than 25% of productive land in Nam Dien hamlet, Van Mai commune. Part V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Conclusions 72. As of July 2010, implementation of compensation and resettlement for the road has been finished substantially, there is only one case that has not received compensation and handed over the site. All other affected households have received compensation and handed over the sites for the project. The remaining issues raised in the previous monitoring report have been settled, except Mrs. Toan's case. Most of affected people satisfy with the compensation policies and do not have any further requests and they only wish for an early construction of the project. 71. Basically, the PMU and the district Resettlement Committees have complied with the resettlement procedures presented in the project RP and in Decree No. 84/2007/ND-CP by the Government of Vietnam. Representatives of the affected people and relating sectors participate in and monitor the project information disclosure, inventory, and compensation payment. Complaints by the affected people have been received and settled timely by the PMU and the authorities. Internal monitoring has also been implemented properly and frequently. The PMU has established an office in Mai Chau district and mobilize its resettlement staff to be at the office full-time to deal with the people's queries and problems encountered during project implementation. 73. Internal monitoring reports are prepared properly with sufficient monitoring indicators and reflect the resettlement implementation progress as well as problems that need to be resolved. Resettlement data are stored at the district Resettlement Committees and at the PMU's office in form of paper documents and in computers for management and reporting purposes. The PMU has a separate Department of Resettlement and Compensation to co- operate with the district Resettlement Committees in implementing compensation and land clearance for the road in particular and for the whole project in general. With this operation, implementation of the project compensation and resettlement has been precise, objective and easy, the affected people's grievances have been treated timely and the resettlement implementation progress has been ensured. 74. Generally, the resettlement objectives have been substantially achieved, lives and production of the affected households, especially of the severely AHs, have been stabilized and are being improved. At the monitoring time, 65 out of 66 HHs that have to displace have construction new houses in the remaining land and handed over the sites for the project. Therefore, basically, conditions for construction of the Co Lng-Co Me road have been met though one household at the beginning end of the road has not accepted to be moved. 2. Recommendations 75. To ensure rights and benefits of the affected people, help them promptly settling down, developing production and to be able to construct the road at the planned progress, IMC have some recommendations as follows: (1) The PMU and the Resettlement Committee of Mai Chau district need to resolve Mrs. Toan's case completely in accordance with the resettlement option presented above, for which it should be verified whether this household has two family record books and two red papers, if yes, it should be checked whether these records and papers are eligible or not for a basis for compensation, allowances and resettlement. (2) One-time allowances should be prepared (instead of allowances by years) for poor households that are severely affected to provide them with sufficient amounts of money for investment and development of production to get rid of being poor. The poor households that are marginally affected should be considered to be included in the Livelihood Restoration Program of the main project (if possible). (3) Origin of land for the kindergarten in Choi hamlet and the complaints made by 15 households that they lose more than 25% of productive land in Nam Dien hamlet should be verified to resolve and respond in writing. If it is as petitioned by these affected households, an additional compensation and allowance plan should be prepared. (4) The PMU needs to enhance monitoring during the construction phase to ensure that any negative impacts on the local people during construction will be measured and compensated timely in accordance with the project policies. Appendix 1: Summary and comparison of compensation costs of RP and DMS a) Mai Chau district, Hoa Binh By RP Actual DMS Nr Items Unit Quantity Prices Amount Quantity Prices Amount Remarks I Land compensation 3 729 011 720 1 Compensation for land and crops m2 2 969 991 720 1.1 Compensation for lands 2 624 569 400 1 784 914 700 Compensation for residential land m2 22,408.5 128000; 25000 1,862,441,500 3,989.2 331,501,440 From 40.000 - 128.000VND/m2 Compensation for annual crops land m2 748.1 27,000 20,198,700 12,448.8 25,000 311,220,000 Compensation for perennial land m2 5,381.8 25,000 134,545,000 6,116.6 38,000 221,562,860 Compensation for productive forest land m2 41,750.3 14,000 584,504,200 30,558.6 14,000 427,820,400 Compensation for aquacultural land m2 4,149.1 - Compensation for public land m2 653.8 22,000; 35,000 22,880,000 Compensation for garden land m2 19,712.4 25,000 492,810,000 1.2 Compensation for trees/crops 345 422 320 794 853 900 including temporary acqusition 7476.93m2 và - Annual crops 748.1 1,200 897,720 421 cây 31,623,600 From 2000 - 20.000VND 18,839.6m2/tán - Perennial trees 538.0 70,000 37,660,000 và 422 cây 612,369,200 From 4500 - 40.000VND Bamboo prices: D<5cm: 5000VND; 5 25% person 0.0 5. Vocational training allowance person 0.0 6. Allowance for poor AHs (900.000/person/6 person 0.0 Not done years) Sum (I+II+III) 5,446.8 5,086,511,720 4,710,459,500 4,757,975,700 Verification cost 3,000,000 Implementation cost 104,510,000 Total Not include allowances 4,865,485,700 b) Quan Hoa district, Thanh Hoa By RP by DMS Nr. Items Unit Quantity Prices Amount Quantity Prices Amount Remarks I Compensation 311,467.2 12,355,651,123 1 Compensation for land and crops m2 308,154.2 10,091,051,123 1.1 Land 308,154.2 8,150,317,870 290,769 2,213,684,450 Residential land 42,027.0 130 000 5,463,510,000 17,649 40,000 705,940,000 Garden land 6,203 27,000 167,467,500 Annual crops/trees 8,257.5 16 200 133,771,500 - Perennial crops/trees 1,469.5 5 500 8,082,250 4,133 8,000 33,060,800 Productive forestry land 254,297.2 9 600 2,441,253,120 262,545 5,000 1,312,724,000 Aqua. land 549.9 5 000 2,749,500 229 8,000 1,829,600 Rice land 12 15,000 184,500 Public land 1,553.1 65 000 100,951,500 include temporary acquisition, not 1.2 Compensation for crops/trees 1,940,733,253 693,582,827 include wooden trees 10419.4m2 T 3319 - Annual crops/trees 8,257.5 6 780 55,985,850 và 3053 cây 35958 90,065,224 T 7680 - Perennial trees 147.0 106 549 15,662,703 2,113 251720 168,960,918 Young bamboo 26,313 7,190 189,190,470 Harvesting bamboo 267,012.1 7 000 1,869,084,700 38,666 5,063 195,765,958 * Compensation for assets and structures 3,826,100,000 3,315,900,928 include temporary acquisition 2. Compensation for public assets 40.0 41,000,000 2.1 Compensation for structures 40.0 41,000,000 Primary school m2 40.0 41,000,000 44 956,000 41,968,400 2 Kindergartent m 0.0 2 Meeting room m 0.0 2.2 Auxiliary works 2.3 Crops/tree on public land 3. Compensation for assets of affected household 3,273.0 2,223,600,000 T 381,000 - 3.1. Houses m2 2,354.0 1,694,800,000 4325.4 m2 750,000 2,759,585,550 T 68,000 - 3.2. Auxiliary works m2 919.0 67,000,000 926 750,000 397,229,797 T 24,000 - 3.3 Other auxiliary works 21,800,000 261,000 124,686,361 not included in 21 additional 3.4 Tombs 368,900,000 272 800,000 247,540,000 tombs 3.5 Annual tree on residential land 100,000 not included in crops and trees 3.6 Perennial tree on residential land 66,300,000 compensation t 3,194 - 3.7 Wooden tree on residential land 4,800,000 5,134 59,640 48,948,129 II. Temporary acquisition 2,700,900,000 Compensation for crops/trees 601,000,000 included in crops and trees Compensation for other assets 1,561,500,000 compensation Allowances 538,400,000 Ongoing III. Resettlement allowances 382.0 1,388,400,000 From 0 - 1. House leveling allowance HH 42.0 7,000,000 294,000,000 57 7,000,000 233,311,672 2. Transportation allowance HH 42.0 3,000,000 126,000,000 57 3,000,000 171,000,000 3. Subsistent allowance (6 months) person 178.0 320,400,000 230 273,780,000 4. Allowance for losing > 25% person 0.0 - 5. Vocational training allowance person 0.0 - 6. Allowance for poor HHs These allowances are being (900.000/person/6 years) person 120.0 648,000,000 prepared Cng (I+II+III) Tr.ng 311,849 16,444,951,123 6,470,708,205 Chi thm nh 15,529,700 D phòng (5%) 323,535,410 Tng cng 6,809,773,315 Giá tr phê duyt Appendix 2: Summary of Ahs by communes and ethnic groups. Affected house and Affected agri land Number Total AHs Business HHs Communes relocated HHs HHs of hamlets AHs APs AHs APs AHs APs AHs APs Total (A+B) 15 486 1954 66 274 420 1680 20 75 Quan Hoa district 11 360 1446 57 234 303 1212 18 66 Mai Chau district 4 126 508 9 40 117 468 2 9 Thái 263 1062 56 222 227 903 18 71 Thành phn dân tc Mng 98 392 1 4 85 340 0 0 Kinh 125 500 9 38 108 437 2 9 A. Permanent acquisition I. Quan Hoá 11 360 1440 57 228 303 1212 18 66 1 Trung Sn 5 166 668 25 103 141 555 13 45 2 Phú Thanh 1 34 136 7 28 27 103 3 Thành Sn 5 160 636 25 97 135 504 5 21 II. Mai Châu 4 126 504 9 40 117 468 2 9 1 Mai Hch 1 28 112 2 11 26 109 2 Vn Mai 3 98 392 7 29 91 359 2 9 Total (I+II) 15 486 1994 66 264 420 1680 20 75 Thái 263 1052 56 222 227 903 18 71 Ethnic minority Mng 98 392 1 4 85 340 Kinh 125 500 9 38 108 437 2 9 B. Temporary acquisition I. Quan Hoá 8 237 854 50 205 187 0 0 0 1 Trung Sn 2 69 249 21 87 48 2 Phú Thanh 1 26 94 7 27 19 3 Thành Sn 5 142 511 22 84 120 II. Mai Châu 4 126 452 9 31 117 0 0 0 1 Mai Hch 1 28 101 2 9 26 2 Vn Mai 3 98 351 7 22 91 Total (I+II) 12 363 1306 59 236 304 Thái 197 795 32 128 167 Ethnic minority Mng 73 297 12 48 59 Kinh 93 347 15 60 78 Appendix 3: Summary of land acquisition area Nr Hamlets/ land types Unit Permanent acquisition Temporary acquisition A MAI CHÂU 72,097.41 25,204.10 I Chói hamlet m² 30,119.30 8,505.00 1 Land for annual crops m² 3,403.20 923.80 2 Land for perennial trees m² 4,670.60 1,348.80 3 Residential land m² 250.00 60.00 4 Garden land m² 6,128.10 1,706.10 5 Garden land within Residential land m² 7,108.60 6 Productive forest land m² 15,667.40 4,466.30 II Nam in hamlet m² 14,142.28 5,362.40 1 Land for annual crops m² 6,317.30 2,805.70 2 Land for perennial trees m² 368.00 207.30 3 Residential land m² 2,160.28 986.10 4 Garden land m² 3,465.60 1,206.80 5 Garden land within Residential land m² 2,948.80 6 Productive forest land m² 1,831.10 156.50 III Dn hamlet m² 19,448.63 9,559.60 1 Land for annual crops m² 3,081.90 1,035.10 2 Land for perennial trees m² 1,424.50 786.20 3 Residential land m² 1,379.93 850.50 4 Garden land m² 6,822.40 4,248.00 5 Garden land within Residential land m² 6,494.40 6 Productive forest land m² 6,739.90 2,639.80 IV Thanh Mai hamlet m² 8,387.20 1,777.10 1 Land for annual crops m² - - 2 Land for perennial trees m² 286.60 55.50 3 Residential land m² 400.00 - 4 Garden land m² 1,831.60 494.30 5 Garden land within Residential land m² 808.30 6 Productive forest land m² 5,869.00 1,227.30 B QUAN HÓA 290,769.40 93,839.40 I Uôn hamlet m² 44,532.00 12,251.20 1 Land for perennial trees m² 575.60 137.30 2 Residential land m² 5,670.60 1,361.00 3 Garden land m² 533.90 635.80 4 Aquacultural land m² 128.90 36.20 5 Productive forest land m² 37,623.00 10,080.90 II Tân Hng hamlet m² 53,255.70 15,017.50 1 Land for perennial trees m² 430.90 357.30 2 Residential land m² 1,075.20 500.30 3 Garden land m² 209.00 253.10 4 Productive forest land m² 51,540.60 13,906.80 III Nam Thành hamlet m² 26,875.30 11,343.40 1 Land for perennial trees m² 566.50 66.60 2 Residential land m² 2,120.90 1,278.70 Nr Hamlets/ land types Unit Permanent acquisition Temporary acquisition 3 Garden land m² 770.40 513.00 4 Productive forest land m² 23,417.50 9,485.10 IV Sn Thành hamlet m² 48,847.10 14,503.60 1 Land for perennial trees m² 860.20 347.40 2 Residential land m² 684.80 196.20 3 Garden land m² 1,125.50 310.30 4 Productive forest land m² 46,176.60 13,649.70 V Thành Tân hamlet m² 44,644.50 16,310.60 1 Land for perennial trees m² 747.30 413.30 2 Residential land m² 2,978.90 1,152.70 3 Garden land m² 741.40 573.60 4 Productive forest land m² 40,077.10 14,171.00 5 Aquacultural land m² 99.80 VI Ching Yên hamlet m² 6,231.50 2,632.90 1 Land for perennial trees m² 439.60 124.20 2 Residential land m² 824.60 56.20 3 Garden land m² 564.10 415.10 4 Productive forest land m² 4,390.90 1,866.50 5 Paddy land m² 12.30 170.90 VII Bó hamlet m² 25,097.40 9,172.40 1 Land for perennial trees m² 512.50 298.80 2 Residential land m² 1,439.80 910.70 3 Garden land m² 177.80 204.30 4 Productive forest land m² 22,967.30 7,758.60 VIII Po hamlet m² 41,285.90 12,607.80 1 Residential land m² 2,853.70 677.30 2 Garden land m² 2,080.40 524.50 3 Productive forest land m² 36,351.80 11,406.00 C Total (A+B) 362,866.81 119,043.50