RP1490 V4 RURAL ELECTRIFICATION AGENCY Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for Ayer-Kamdini- Minakulu-Bobi and Environs in Northern Uganda (75 km) Final Report RESCO PROPERTY CONSULTANT SURVEYORS 11/12/2010 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF TERMS ................................................................................................................................... VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................................VIII 1. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................1 1.1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..............................................................................................................................1 1.2. THE AIM OF THE RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN .....................................................................................2 1.3. OBJECTIVES OF THE RAP ...........................................................................................................................2 1.3.1. Approach and Methodology ...........................................................................................................2 1.3.1.2. Census ................................................................................................................................................3 1.3.1.7. Inventory of lost and affected Assets ............................................................................................4 1.3.1.8. Socio-economic Surveys and Studies ............................................................................................5 1.3.2. Analysis of Surveys and Studies ....................................................................................................7 2. PROJECT IMPACTS AND AFFECTED PERSONS ............................................................................... 9 2.1. PROJECT AFFECTED PERSONS....................................................................................................................9 2.2. SOCIO-ECONOMIC BASELINE OF PAPS ....................................................................................................9 2.2.1. Age and Gender .................................................................................................................................9 2.2.2. Educational Attainment ................................................................................................................10 2.2.3. Ethnicity ..........................................................................................................................................11 2.2.4. Livelihoods and Employment .......................................................................................................11 2.2.5. Ownership and Particulars of the affected Person ...................................................................11 2.2.6. Burial Sites ......................................................................................................................................13 2.2.7. Income Sources................................................................................................................................13 2.2.8. General Information about Children ...........................................................................................14 2.2.9. Impaired Persons ............................................................................................................................15 2.2.10. Production Systems .......................................................................................................................17 2.2.11. Social Network and Support System ...........................................................................................19 3. LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR LAND ACQUISITION AND COMPENSATION.............................. 20 3.1. RELEVANT NATIONAL LAWS ....................................................................................................................20 3.2. OTHER LAWS .............................................................................................................................................21 3.2.1. THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT (1997) ...............................................................................................21 3.2.2. Land Acquisition Act (1965).............................................................................................................22 3.2.3. Land Tenure Regimes and Transfer of Land .....................................................................................22 3.3. VALUATION AND COMPENSATION OF ASSETS .........................................................................................24 3.4. WORLD BANK REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................................25 4. INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES ....................................................................................................27 IN IMPLEMENTING THIS RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN, THREE KEY STAKEHOLDERS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED INCLUDING THE MINISTRY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT, MINISTRY OF LANDS, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND REA. .....................................................................................................................................27 4.1. Rural Electrification Agency .................................................................................................................27 4.2. Ministry of Local Government ..............................................................................................................27 iii 4.3. Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development ..........................................................................27 4.4. Related Line Ministries .........................................................................................................................28 4.4.1. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development ..........................................................................28 4.4.2. Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries ..........................................................28 4.4.3. Ministry of Health .........................................................................................................................28 4.4.4. Ministry of Education and Sports ...............................................................................................28 4.4.5. Ministry of Water, Lands and Environment ..............................................................................29 4.4.6. Ministry of Works, Housing and Communication ....................................................................29 4.4.7. Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development ....................................................29 4.5. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE .................................................................................................................29 5. COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK ....................................................................................................... 30 5.1. KEY PRINCIPLES........................................................................................................................................30 5.1.1. COMPENSATION AND RESETTLEMENT PACKAGES ...........................................................................30 5.2. ELIGIBILITY ...............................................................................................................................................32 5.3. RATES APPLIED.........................................................................................................................................33 5.3.1. GENERAL REMARKS AND ASSUMPTIONS ..........................................................................................33 5.3.2. CUT-OFF DATE......................................................................................................................................34 5.3.3. VALUATION CERTIFICATE ...................................................................................................................34 6. RESETTLEMENT ASSISTANCE AND RESTORATION OF LIVELIHOODS ................................ 37 6.1. LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION STRATEGIES ..............................................................................................37 6.2. SPECIAL ASSISTANCE FOR WOMEN AND VULNERABLE GROUPS.........................................................37 7. PUBLIC CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING................... 39 7.1. COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS OF THE PROJECT ........................................................................................39 7.2. COMMUNITY CONCERNS .........................................................................................................................39 7.2.1. IMPACT ON PROPERTY AND CULTURAL SITES...................................................................................39 8. GRIEVANCE MECHANISM.................................................................................................................. 41 8.1. MECHANISMS OF GRIEVANCE AND APPEALS ........................................................................................41 8.1.1. Reconciliatory Procedure ..............................................................................................................41 8.1.2. Written Complaints to REA .........................................................................................................41 8.1.3. Legal Redress ..................................................................................................................................42 8.2. PUBLIC DISCLOSURE ................................................................................................................................42 9. MONITORING, EVALUTION AND REPORTING FRAMEWORK ................................................ 43 9.1. Internal monitoring process...................................................................................................................43 9.1.1. During resettlement ........................................................................................................................43 9.1.2. After resettlement ...........................................................................................................................44 9.1.3. Key Activities and Responsibilities ............................................................................................44 9.2. EXTERNAL EVALUATION PROCESS............................................................................................................44 9.2.1. Process Indicators ..........................................................................................................................45 9.2.2. Outcome Indicators .......................................................................................................................45 9.2.3. Key activities and responsibilities .....................................................................................................46 9.3. RAP COMPLETION REPORT........................................................................................................................46 iv 9.4. COMPLETION AUDIT .................................................................................................................................46 v GLOSSARY OF TERMS Compensation—Payment in cash or in kind for an asset or a resource that is acquired or affected by a project at the time the asset needs to be replaced. Cut-off date—Date of completion of the census and assets inventory of persons affected by the project. Persons occupying the project area after the cutoff date are not eligible for compensation and/or resettlement assistance. Similarly, fixed assets (such as built structures, crops, fruit trees, and woodlots) established after the date of completion of the assets inventory, or an alternative mutually agreed on date, will not be compensated. Host population—People living in or around areas to which people physically displaced by a project will be resettled who, in turn, may be affected by the resettlement. Economic displacement—Loss of income streams or means of livelihood resulting from land acquisition or obstructed access to resources (land, water, or forest) resulting from the construction or operation of a project or its associated facilities. Involuntary resettlement—Resettlement is involuntary when it occurs without the informed consent of the displaced persons or if they give their consent without having the power to refuse resettlement. Land expropriation—Process whereby a public authority, usually in return for compensation, requires a person, household, or community to relinquish rights to land that it occupies or otherwise uses OD 4.30—The World Bank Group Operational Directive on Involuntary Resettlement. OD 4.30 embodies the basic principles and procedures that underlie IFC’s approach to involuntary resettlement associated with its investment projects. Project-affected household—All members of a household, whether related or not, operating as a single economic unit, who are affected by a project. Project-affected person—Any person who, as a result of the implementation of a project, loses the right to own, use, or otherwise benefit from a built structure, land (residential, agricultural, or pasture), annual or perennial crops and trees, or any other fixed or moveable asset, either in full or in part, permanently or temporarily. Physical displacement—Loss of shelter and assets resulting from the acquisition of land associated with a project that requires the affected person(s) to move to another location. vi Replacement cost—The rate of compensation for lost assets must be calculated at full replacement cost, that is, the market value of the assets plus transaction costs. With regard to land and structures, IFC defines “replacement costs� as follows:  agricultural land—the market value of land of equal productive use or potential located in the vicinity of the affected land, plus the cost of preparation to levels similar to or better than those of the affected land, plus the cost of any registration and transfer taxes;  land in urban areas—the market value of land of equal size and use, with similar or improved public infrastructure facilities and services preferably located in the vicinity of the affected land, plus the cost of any registration and transfer taxes;  household and public structures—the cost of purchasing or building a new structure, with an area and quality similar to or better than those of the affected structure, or of repairing a partially affected structure, including labor and contractors’ fees and any registration and transfer taxes. In determining the replacement cost, depreciation of the asset and the value of salvage materials are not taken into account, nor is the value of benefits to be derived from the project deducted from the valuation of an affected asset. Resettlement Action Plan (RAP)—The document in which a project sponsor or other responsible entity specifies the procedures that it will follow and the actions that it will take to mitigate adverse effects, compensate losses, and provide development benefits to persons and communities affected by an investment project. Resettlement assistance—Support provided to people who are physically displaced by a project. Assistance may include transportation, food, shelter, and social services that are provided to affected people during their relocation. Assistance may also include cash allowances that compensate affected people for the inconvenience associated with resettlement and defray the expenses of a transition to a new locale, such as moving expenses and lost work days. vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Government of Uganda, recognizing the importance of energy in transforming the quality of life of Ugandans, embarked on the process of systematic energy planning with the formulation of a National Energy Policy for Uganda in September 2002. The Energy Policy Goal is “ to meet the energy needs of Uganda’s population for social and economic development in an environmentally sustainable manner Project Description The Government of Uganda has received financing from the World Bank towards the cost of the Energy for Rural Transformation Project Phase II, and intends to apply part of the loan proceeds to make payments under the contracts for Consultancy Services for Detailed Action Plan (RAP) for the Ayer-Kamdini-Minakulu-Bobi and Environs in Northern Uganda (75km). The proposed 75 kilometres Ayer-Kamdini-Bobi-Minakulu power distribution line project covers three district of Kole Oyam and Gulu, 10 sub countries and 84 villages/LCI cells. The study was to prepare a Resettlement Action Plan to establish compensation and resettlement costs for the PAPs before the implementation of the project. The aim of the Resettlement Action Plan The purpose of the consultancy is to prepare a detailed RAP to establish the social impacts associated with setting up of these 33kV lines, ROW of clearing and setting of temporary camps for equipment storage construction and compensation of other resettlement costs for the Project Affected Persons (PAPs). The RAP has been carried out in a way that respects Uganda Government Policies as well as the World Bank’s O.P. 4.12 Involuntary Resettlement. Objectives of the RAP Specifically, the resettlement action plan focused on determining the extent of resettlement impacts associated with establishment of the distribution line, and put in place measures to mitigate those impacts. The impacts here are to do with land/way- leaves acquisition and the accompanying loss or interruption of the livelihoods of the project affected people due to construction activities related to the proposed distribution lines. Additionally, this resettlement action plan aimed at carrying out consultations with relevant stakeholders, including potentially affected persons, to obtain their views and suggestions regarding the social impacts of the proposed project and measures to cover the losses. Approach and Methodology The first task in planning resettlement was to identify a project’s adverse impacts and the populations that will be affected. As noted above, this usually requires the participation of qualified experts who have appropriate training and experience. Resettlement planning involves more than simple cadastral surveys or inventories of affected assets. Consultation with officials of local government, community leaders, and viii other representatives of the affected population was essential to gaining a comprehensive understanding of the types and degrees of adverse project effects. Property valuation and assessment of compensation awards has been carried out within the broad terms of reference (TOR) of the RAP study for the proposed Ayer-Kamdini- Minakulu -Bobi power distribution line project. An inventory of lost and affected assets at the household, enterprise, and community level was undertaken in order to ascertain all losses that will result for each household, enterprise, or community affected by the project. Socioeconomic surveys and studies of all affected people were undertaken in order to understand socio-economic condition of the potentially affected persons in the project areas the study will used the sustainable livelihoods approach which is a way to improve understanding of the livelihoods of poor people. Analysis of surveys and studies to establish compensation parameters were undertaken in order, to design appropriate income restoration and sustainable development initiatives, and to identify baseline monitoring indicators; and analysis of the data collected in the census, assets inventory, and socioeconomic studies. Project Impacts and Affected Persons Detailed list of affected persons is attached as an annex to this report. Given that a 10 meter strip will be required for the way leaves and noting that most of the affected plots are within road reserves, this assessment team found that only crops and trees will be affected. There are Eighty Four (84) affected villages, in Kole, Oyam and Gulu Districts. The total number of claimants is 1143 and the assessed total compensation is Shs.95,675, 252/- (Ninety Five Million Six Hundred Seventy Five Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Two Thousand Shillings Only). Implementation Schedule Having assigned the different organizational responsibilities, this team anticipates that the RAP implementation is likely to cover a period of 13 months. The sequencing of activities bears in mind that some activities can be undertaken at the same time. Compensation Framework Information from the socio-economic survey and census guided the selection of the most appropriate compensation packages while bearing in mind the different scenarios. Due to lack of Area Compensation Rates for newly created districts of Oyam and Kole, the consultant applied/used the current Area Compensation Rates of Gulu district to arrive at the compensation awards to the PAPs. Cut-off Date The date of the valuation/assessment is November 2010 Budget ix There are Eighty Four (84) affected villages, in Kole, Oyam and Gulu Districts. The total number of claimants is 1143 and the assessed total compensation is Shs.95,675,252/- (Ninety Five Million Six Hundred Seventy Five Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Two Thousand Shillings Only). Resettlement Assistance and Restoration of Livelihoods Wherever possible, the Government of Uganda tries to avoid or minimize the displacement of people by exploring alternative project designs The Rural Electriction Agency guided by the Wayleaves Act, provides for realignment of power lines in order to minimize displacement of households or businesses. International guidelines like the IFC recommends that project sponsors undertake the necessary actions on behalf of all affected people, including members of the host communities in which displaced people will be settled. Special Assistance for Women and Vulnerable Groups The Resettlement Planning team identifies this as the most appropriate option for resettlement assistance and livelihood restoration given that although women form a small percentage of the affected households, the nature of tenure agreements in Northern Uganda that is customary in nature makes women more vulnerable to access to productive resources. As a result women tend to suffer more than men as a result of social changes. Therefore throughout the development of this RAP some of the immediate and practical measures are proposed to improve women’s adaptation to resettlement. Public Consultation, Participation and Development Planning Generally, most communities that were consulted were happy with the proposed project. They noted that some of the villages were previously connected to power but the facilities got vandalized during the war. It was observed that most of the trading centers had the potential to grow like Corner Mowlem but this was hampered by no power in the area. Most communities wondered when the actual work would begin given the need for power in schools, health centers and other related infrastructure including the trading centre. Other issues that were raised include impact of the power line on cemeteries and graveyards and payment for the crops destroyed, and were informed on the crops that would be identified during the census and valued, impact on structures and whether property would be lost whether trees were not allowed under the wayleaves and would have to be compensated. On the compensation framework, one community member wondered whether compensation rates were negotiable suggesting that previous rates that have been found to be unfavorable and the method of compensation would be adopted. Additionally, community members wondered whether they will be given work to help in putting up the power line and were informed that should transmission come, employment opportunities would be availed where need. Members suggested that some of the opportunities that they x should benefit from include cutting of trees, clearing of land and digging holes. On grievances, one community member narrated that previous power line planners did not compensate them for the crops lost and wondered what procedure they should use in case they have complaints. Considering that there is no structure at the moment, they were advised to inform or report this to the RDC. However, a grievance mechanism has been recommended in this report to manage the grievance process. Grievance Mechanism Regardless of its scale, involuntary resettlement inevitably gives rise to grievances among the affected population over issues ranging from rates of compensation and eligibility criteria to the location of resettlement sites and the quality of services at those sites. There is need to ensure that procedures are in place to allow affected people to lodge a complaint or a claim (including claims that derive from customary law and usage) without cost and with the assurance of a timely and satisfactory resolution of that complaint or claim. Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting Framework The purpose of monitoring and evaluation for this RAP will be to report about the effectiveness of the implementation of the RAP, covering resettlement, disbursement of compensation and effectiveness of public involvement, amongst others. Monitoring and purposeful evaluation will be key factors for successful resettlement activities. Monitoring will also entail evaluation of effectiveness of the grievance management process. The monitoring Framework proposed in this RAP includes a review of financial disbursements, compensation complaints and grievance redress, adherence to compensation payment schedule, support of vulnerable PAPs. RAP completion report During RAP implementation the consultant will submit to REA quarterly progress reports, after completion of resettlement, a final report will be submitted by REA prior to preparation of the project implementation report. This report will give overall assessment of the RAP process indicating activities undertaken, success of mitigation action ns and monitoring and well as useful lessons learnt. Completion Audit The purpose of Completion Audit will be to establish whether REA implemented all activities needed to ensure compliance proposed resettlement commitments and applicable national and international policies. xi 1. INTRODUCTION The Government of Uganda, recognizing the importance of energy in transforming the quality of life of Ugandans, embarked on the process of systematic energy planning with the formulation of a National Energy Policy for Uganda in September 2002. The Energy Policy Goal is “ to meet the energy needs of Uganda’s population for social and economic development in an environmentally sustainable manner�. The Policy covers the various energy sub-sectors including: Power, Petroleum, New and Renewable Sources of Energy, and Atomic Power. While the sub-sectors are supply based, the Policy also covers energy demand issues and proposes strategies and plans for supplying the required energy. One of the strategies highlighted is the implementation of the Rural Electrification Strategy and Plan 2001-2010 (RESP) which has been passed by Cabinet in February 2001, as dictated by Section 63 of the Electricity Act 1999. Statutory Instrument No. 75 of 2001, The Electricity (Establishment and Management of the Rural Electrification Fund) Instrument 2001, established three inter-related mechanisms for management of Uganda’s rural electrification program namely, the Rural Electrification Fund (REF), the Rural Electrification Board (REB) and the Rural Electrification Agency (REA) all supervised by the Minister responsible for Energy. REA serves as the Secretariat to the Board whose principal responsibility is to ensure management of the Fund for equitable promotion of rural electricity access and connectivity. 1.1.Project Description The Government of Uganda has received financing from the World Bank towards the cost of the Energy for Rural Transformation Project Phase II, and intends to apply part of the loan proceeds to make payments under the contracts for Consultancy Services for Detailed Action Plan (RAP) for the Ayer-Kamdini-Minakulu-Bobi and Environs in Northern Uganda (75km). The proposed 75 kilometres Ayer-Kamdini-Bobi-Minakulu power distribution line project covers three district of Kole Oyam and Gulu, 10 sub countries and 84 villages/LCI cells. The study was to prepare a Resettlement Action Plan to establish compensation and resettlement costs for the PAPs before the implementation of the project. The study was carried in the way that takes into account the Uganda Laws/policies as well as the social safeguard policies of the World Bank and other funding agencies. The proposed construction of distribution lines is associated with  Construction of HV power lines consisting of line structures, accessories and conductors;  Cleaning of right of way as necessary  Construction of HV/LV sub stations and associated infrastructure;  Construction of the low voltage reticulation for the covered trading centres and towns;  Construction of the workers’ camp and storage facilities for the project materials The project located in Northern Uganda will include the construction of 33kv line of a route length of at least 65 km with LV networks at selected potential load centers divided up as detailed below: 1. 43.5 km of 33 kV power line from Corner Aboke to Kamdini Township including tee-offs to Atapara Mission and Loro Teacher Training College; 2. Tee-offs of 4km to Aber, 2km to Loro PTC, and 3.5km to Atapara Mission; 3. 25 km of 33kV power line from Bobi to Minakulu to Kamdini 1.2.The aim of the Resettlement Action Plan The purpose of the consultancy is to prepare a detailed RAP to establish the social impacts associated with setting up of these 33kV lines, ROW of clearing and setting of temporary camps for equipment storage construction and compensation of other resettlement costs for the Project Affected Persons (PAPs). The RAP has been carried out in a way that respects Uganda Government Policies as well as the World Bank’s O.P. 4.12 Involuntary Resettlement. 1.3.Objectives of the RAP Specifically, the resettlement action plan focused on determining the extent of resettlement impacts associated with establishment of the distribution line, and put in place measures to mitigate those impacts. The impacts here are to do with land/way- leaves acquisition and the accompanying loss or interruption of the livelihoods of the project affected people due to construction activities related to the proposed distribution lines. Additionally, this resettlement action plan aimed at carrying out consultations with relevant stakeholders, including potentially affected persons, to obtain their views and suggestions regarding the social impacts of the proposed project and measures to cover the losses. The outcome of the consultations are reflected in the RAP report and incorporated into the project design as appropriate. The results of the consultations will be made available to all relevant stakeholders, including potentially affected persons. 1.3.1. Approach and Methodology 1.3.1.1.Reconnaissance and consultations The consultancy team comprising valuers, surveyors, sociologists and the RAP specialist visited the district of Kole, Oyam and Gulu and went through the areas of the proposed wayleaves route/project site. The objective of this activity was to get 2 firsthand experience of the project area as to well as introduce the tam and the project to the local leaders. The consultant met and made consultations with the district and subcounty leaders in Kole, Oyam and Gulu districts. The purpose of these meetings was for the consultant to introduce himself and the project and seek support/assistance and cooperation of the leaders in having easy entry to the communities while doing fieldwork. Consultation meetings enabled the consultant to receive guidance in planning sensitization and public awareness meetings for the project affected persons at a village levels. 1.3.1.2.Census Property valuation and assessment of compensation awards was carried out within the broad terms of reference (TOR) of the RAP study for the proposed Ayer-Kamdini- Minakulu -Bobi power distribution line project. In accordance with the scope, the valuation task of the study were to:- (a) Identify the project affected person using procedures approved by the Chief Government Value, carry out detailed valuation of all affected land, properties and livelihoods affected by the project, which provided the basis for compensation/resettlement. (b) Compile land acquisition and resettlement costs for areas that PAPs are to be resettled if any. (c) Ensure the data collection during valuation is done on forms acceptable to the Chief Government Valuer and the process is properly witnessed by the client. (d) Ensure that all property such as houses and PAPs are photo document, including damaged crops, for easy identification during disclosure and payments. (e) Witnessing the valuation exercise: REA staff shall sign on behalf of the client during the valuation exercise. Other signatories were be the Consultant and local council and the independent NGO (f) The valuation data base is to be duplicated one copy to the client and the other to the consultant during the valuation process. (g) An independent Witness NGO were appointed by the client to witness the valuation exercise. 1.3.1.3.Mobilization and Sensitization The consultant carried out mobilization and sensitization of the PAPs at village levels in all areas affected by distribution line. Mobilization and sensitization was aimed at preparing the PAPs for the activities under the assignment. The consultant was able to explain to the PAPs the possible route (project site) the likely damage to be caused, the process and basis of assessment of damages for compensation. The PAPs were also told 3 of the benefits that would accrue to the area in general because of the provision of electricity supply. The consultant informed the PAPs of the available mechanism to address any grievances that may arise during project implementation. The views and concerns of the communities would be recorded. 1.3.1.4.Identification of the Project site The client provided the consultant with maps defining the routes of the proposed power line. The consultant sought further information from the design consultants which were used by the surveyors to define the route on the ground. The route of the power line determined the districts, the sub counties, parishes, villages and individual land holdings affected by the project. 1.3.1.5.Sensitization of PAPs Guided by the route and in consultation with the district and sub county officials the consultant was able to identify locations venues for PAPs sensitization meetings. Then the consultant prepared a program for the meetings. In the meetings the valuation team together with other members of the consultancy team explained the Government policies on rural electrification, assessment and payment compensation for any damages and urged communities to cooperate and support the field team. The consultancy team explained the basis of assessment, the methodology and how grievances would be addressed. 1.3.1.6.Field Data Capture After carrying out consultations and sensitization, the surveyors defined the 10 metres wayleaveas corridors including the different individual land holdings and identified of the land owners. The crops, economic trees and other assets to be affected were referenced, enumerated and detailed entered on the assessment forms. The exercise was witnessed by the beneficiaries and the LCI chair persons. The forms were stamped by LCI chairperson as proof of the data collected. This census was undertaken in order to enumerate the affected people and register them according to location; register the affected population by residence or locality; establish a list of legitimate beneficiaries before the project’s onset that counters spurious claims from those moving into the project area solely in anticipation of benefits; lay a framework for subsequent socioeconomic research needed to establish fair compensation rates and to design, monitor, and evaluate sustainable income restoration or development interventions; and providing a baseline for monitoring and evaluation. 1.3.1.7.Inventory of lost and affected Assets An inventory of lost and affected assets at the household, enterprise, and community level was undertaken in order to ascertain all losses that will result for each household, enterprise, or community affected by the project. The survey accounted for land acquisition and loss of physical assets as well as loss of income—temporary or 4 permanent—resulting from displacement of household members from employment or income-generating resources. 1.3.1.8.Socio-economic Surveys and Studies The RAP identified all people affected by the project and all adverse impacts on their livelihoods associated with the project’s land acquisition. Typical effects include breakup of communities and social support networks; loss of dwellings, farm buildings, and other structures (wells, boreholes, irrigation works, and fencing), agricultural land, trees, and standing crops; impeded or lost access to community resources such as water sources, pasture, forest and woodland, medicinal plants, game animals, or fisheries; loss of business; loss of access to public infrastructure or services; and reduced income resulting from these losses. Socioeconomic surveys and studies of all affected people were undertaken in order to understand socio-economic condition of the potentially affected persons in the project areas the study will used the sustainable livelihoods approach which is a way to improve understanding of the livelihoods of poor people. It draws on the main factors that affect poor people's livelihoods and the typical relationships between these factors. The two key components of the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach are: a framework that helps in understanding the complexities of poverty and a set of principles to guide action to address and overcome poverty. The framework places people, particularly rural poor people, at the centre of a web of inter-related influences that affect how these people create a livelihood for themselves and their households. Closest to the people at the centre of the framework are the resources and livelihood assets that they have access to and use. These can include natural resources, technologies, their skills, knowledge and capacity, their health, access to education, sources of credit, or their networks of social support. The extent of their access to these assets is strongly influenced by their vulnerability context, which takes account of trends (for example, economic, political, and technological), shocks (for example, epidemics, natural disasters, civil strife) and seasonality (for example, prices, production, and employment opportunities). Access is also influenced by the prevailing social, institutional and political environment, which affects the ways in which people combine and use their assets to achieve their goals. These are their livelihood strategies. People are the main concern, rather than the resources they use or their governments. SLA is used to identify the main constraints and opportunities faced by poor people, as expressed by them. It builds on these definitions, and then supports poor people as they address the constraints, or take advantage of opportunities. The framework is neither a model that aims to incorporate all the key elements of people's livelihoods, nor a universal solution. Rather, it is a means of stimulating thought and analysis, and it needs to be adapted and elaborated depending on the situation. 5 Therefore, the methodology that was used for this assessment is that of mixed methods, integrating both quantitative and qualitative methods. It includes a review of related literature on policies, a socio-economic survey that will be used to determine the vulnerability context of community members that are translated into negative or positive socio-economic impacts as well as strategies that will be proposed to help them cope or adapt to the negative impacts in order to improve their livelihood outcomes. The qualitative aspects of this assessment include meetings, in-depth interviews with key informants and community meetings. Figure 1: Sustainable Livelihoods Framework The study was undertaken in three main phases: a.) Mobilization and Planning: This phase included the desk study and development of field instruments. The literature that was reviewed included policy documents, district development plans of affected districts as well as other related literature. It also includes mobilization for sensitization meetings b.) Fieldwork: Data Analysis and Synthesis c.) Report Writing Mobilization and Planning This phase included the desk study and development of field instruments. The literature that was reviewed included policy documents, district development plans of sub counties covered by the project areas as well as other related literature. A reconnaissance visit of sub counties and districts was undertaken in order to help plan for the sensitization meetings and the detailed field activities. A structured questionnaire will be developed and pretested for accuracy as well as interview guides that were to be used for the key informant interviews. Two research assistants were selected from the localities and trained for a period of two days. During the training 6 sessions, we will be able to agree on terms and descriptions of different phenomenon that will help in the interpretation of the data. Fieldwork The fieldwork was undertaken between the months of September and October where a census of the potentially affected households was undertaken. In situ, local characteristics of different social groups within communities will be taken into account while selecting respondents and indicators such gender, ethnicity and age will be taken into consideration in order to understand labor dynamics, employment opportunities and gaps, literacy levels and access to social services amongst others. Community meetings were conducted in the project affected area in order to understand the social cultural set up within the communities that would help determine the fears that communities have towards the project. Key informant interviews were undertaken with local government staff and other development partners in the area to determine the strength of local institutions and national policies that would help sustain the project mitigation measures. The processing of the socio-economic data began soon after the start of fieldwork, completed questionnaires were returned periodically from the field to a data processing center, first in the field where they were checked for consistency and check for response errors. The data was then entered into SPSS coded and cleaned in Kampala. The data entry ended in October and data analysis was completed within two weeks. 1.3.2. Analysis of Surveys and Studies Analysis of surveys and studies to establish compensation parameters were undertaken in order, to design appropriate income restoration and sustainable development initiatives, and to identify baseline monitoring indicators; and analysis of the data collected in the census, assets inventory, and socioeconomic studies serves three ends: 1) it provides information needed to establish an entitlement matrix for household- and community-level compensation; 2) it yields basic economic and social information needed to design appropriate livelihood restoration and development interventions; and 3) it provides quantifiable demographic, economic, educational, occupational, and health indicators for future monitoring and evaluation of RAP implementation. This information was essential to designing livelihood restoration measures for affected households and communities. Likewise, the assessments of losses resulting from the effects of the project are better understood in the context of the overall household and community economies. Household data can, in turn, was disaggregated to identify economic strata within communities (the poorest and most vulnerable households, households dependent on remittances, etc.) and to identify appropriate assistance as 7 well as development strategies for the populations affected by the project. Socioeconomic studies also yield important information on the ways in which affected communities are organized and function. These studies provided the team with an understanding of leadership and decision making processes within the community that may function independently of the prevailing political and administrative structures. This understanding also helps resettlement planners to identify informal social support networks that are important for the survival of the community, particularly more vulnerable members of the community such as households headed by women, the impoverished, and groups that suffer social and economic discrimination. 8 2. PROJECT IMPACTS AND AFFECTED PERSONS This chapter is a presentation of the project affected persons as identified in the census and registration exercise. Census and registration provide information on the scale and complexity of the required resettlement planning (for example, the size, distribution, and socioeconomic diversity of the population). The census must encompass all people adversely affected by the project, regardless of their legal status—landowner, holder of land rights, tenant, illegal squatter—or whether they are actually living on an affected site at the time of the census. In other words, lack of legal land title does not disqualify people from resettlement assistance. Private landowners and holders of rights to land as well as any person currently occupying public or private land for shelter, business purposes, or other sources of livelihood (caretakers, squatters, scavengers) should be included in the census. While landless people or squatters may not be eligible for land compensation, they may be eligible for resettlement assistance, compensation for assets (such as shelters and standing crops, orchards, or woodlots), and, where practicable, the benefits of development interventions, which may include provision of land. Resettlement planners must give particular attention to vulnerable groups living in the project area. These groups may include households headed by women or children, people with disabilities, the extremely poor, the elderly, and groups that suffer social and economic discrimination, including indigenous peoples and minorities. Members of vulnerable groups may require special or supplementary resettlement assistance because they are less able to cope with the physical and/or economic displacement than the affected population in general. 2.1.Project Affected Persons Detailed list of affected persons is attached as an annex to this report. The affected persons are presented as an annex in this report. Given that a 10 meter strip will be required for the way leaves and noting that most of the affected plots are within road reserves, this assessment team found that only crops and trees will be affected. There are Eighty Four (84) affected villages, in Kole, Oyam and Gulu Districts. The total number of claimants is 1143 and the assessed total compensation is Shs.95,675,252/- (Ninety Five Million Six Hundred Seventy Five Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Two Thousand Shillings Only). 2.2.Socio-Economic Baseline of PAPs 2.2.1. Age and Gender Results from the socio-economic survey suggest that a bigger percentage of the PAPs fall within the 40 – 64 age bracket. This age group is still economically active and forms a significant proportion of the labor force. 9 Age Distribution of Project Gender Distribution in Affected Persons Affected Areas 6% 9% 15% 18 - 39 years 39% 40 - 64 years Male 65+ years Female 46% NR 85% 85% of the affected households are men while 15% are females, suggesting that female households form part of the vulnerable groups of this study given that are a minority. Recommendations have been made in the resettlement and livelihood restoration component. 2.2.2. Educational Attainment Investment in education contributes to the accumulation of human capital, which is essential for higher incomes and sustained income growth. Formal education is highly instrumental and even necessary to improve the production capacity of a nation and discusses the rationality behind investment in human capital. Empirical evidences of human capital model reveal that investment in education has positive correlation with economic growth and development. Results from the socio-economic survey suggest that most of the respondents interviewed had maximum level of educational attainment of primary school level. Education affects many aspects of life, including individual demographic and health behavior. Studies have shown that educational level is strongly associated with contraceptive use, fertility, and the general health status, morbidity, and mortality of children. In each household, for all persons age five years or older, data were collected on the highest level of education attended and the highest grade completed at that level. Results from the socio-economic survey suggests that 59% of the affected household Upper Primary as their highest level of educational attainment. The implication for these levels is that a bigger proportion of the population would need more skills in order to engage in nonfarm income generating activities. In order to transform livelihood assets into livelihood outcomes, communities need software processes that can help strengthen their coping and livelihood strategies. 10 Highest Level of Educational Attainment 2.2.3. Ethnicity 7% 1% Lower The ethnic groups in an area give an 6% Primary (P1 10% indication on how diverse a community is and - P4) also which minority groups exist in the area. Upper 17% 98% of affected households are Langi. Primary (P5 - P7) 2.2.4. Livelihoods and Employment 59% O'Level A'Level Results from the socio-economic survey that over 78% of households interviewed were engaging in subsistence agriculture this means that over reliance on agro-based that are the least in terms of economic returns is the main reason why there is mass poverty in the affected areas. Benefits from non farm income generating activities can help boost the production and productivity of a household, however due to low levels of education attainment, this is not possible. Occupations of Project Affected Persons 1% 2% 0% 0% 7% Casual Laborer 12% Civil Servant Farmer NR Retired Self Employed 78% Student 2.2.5. Ownership and Particulars of the affected Person In order to understand the vulnerability context of affected persons it was important to understand their level of access to natural or productive assets like land. The results from the socioeconomic survey suggest that 98% of affected persons that were identified own the land that is affected while the other 2% include co-owners and 11 tenants. It is already observed that most of the affected persons are males and hence the few that are women are likely to remain vulnerable to change due to their limited. As northern Ugandans return home, land is becoming a major source of tension, and it is the most vulnerable members of society – women, children, former abductees – who will suffer most. The majority of land in northern Uganda is held by customary tenure i.e. through informal rules enforced by traditional clan structures. Results from the socio- economic survey confirm this observation by revealing that 93% of affected households have land under the customary tenure agreement. Under customary tenure, the concept of land ‘ownership’ is misleading, because future generations are considered to have rights to the land. People are ‘custodians’ rather than owners of land. But to function as it should, the system of customary tenure is reliant on social cohesion and stable family units. It has difficulty accommodating the breakdown in social order, the greater number of children born out of wedlock, and the increase in cohabitation that conflict and displacement have produced. Results from the socio-economic survey suggest that of those who own land 98% have encumbrances on that land given that family members can claim the land and are thus licencees. 98% of these structures are used for both residential and small businesses. Hence maintaining cohesion between families is important for sustainable livelihoods and ensuring access to housing. Encumberances On Affected Usage of Structures on Land Affected Plot 2% 0% Claim by Family Members 10% Residential Only Documents Available Residential & Small 98% No Idea 90% Business However, this cohesion is threatened by the fact that Northern Uganda’s population is extraordinarily young, with a median age of 14 for females and 13 for males.16 Many young people having grown up in the camps, knowledge of customary land law has diminished, including about the rights of widows and orphans, who under Acholi customary law are granted access to land. Formal structures for dealing with land disputes, such as local council courts, are weak and often corrupt. Efforts should be made both to strengthen formal legal structures and to integrate the traditional clan 12 system and knowledge within those structures, for example by calling Households With or Without elders to sit as witnesses on local Burial Sites in Affected Plot council courts during cases involving 1% land. N/A 2.2.6. Burial Sites 29% Project affected persons were asked No Burial Site whether they have any graveyards or in Affected Plot burial sites located within the 10 me 70% Burial sites in way leave area. According to the Affected Plot constitution of the Republic of Uganda, under Article 37 every person has a right to belong to, enjoy, practice and profess, maintain and promote any culture, cultural institution or tradition in community with others. Under the National Objectives and Directive Principles Of State Policy, the State is obliged under objective XXIV and XXVII To promote protect and preserve cultural values and practices which enhance the dignity and wellbeing of Ugandans. Under objective XXV the State is obliged to preserve, promote and generally promote the culture of preservation of public property and Uganda’s heritage the state is also obliged under the objective to promote and implement energy policies that will ensure that people’s basic needs and those of environmental protection are met. According to the socio-economic studies, 70% of affected households were found to have burial sites on the affected plots. However, further analysis revealed that of those burial sites and graveyards, only 4% were likely to be located under the way leaves. In this regard and with consultation of communities, graveyards will be avoided so that they don’t have to be relocated. The impact on graveyards is therefore not significant given the mitigation measure that has been integrated in the compensation framework. 2.2.7. Income Sources PAPs were asked what their primary, secondary and tertiary sources of income with the aim of assessing the project impacts in relation to the livelihoods. Results from the socio-economic survey suggest that 87% primarily depend on crop production as an income sources. 13 Others Sources of Income for Primary Income Sources of Project Affected Households Affected Households 1% 3% 0% Animal Husbandry 1% 0% Crop 9% Business Husbandry Business Formal 99% Employment Animal Crop Husbandry 87% Husbandry None Given the subsistence nature of crop production, marketing constraints and price fluctuations, farmers in the project area remain vulnerable to price and climatic shocks. Furthermore, as the major income source in the project affected area, crop damage causes a significant income loss. Moreover, even without any agricultural shock, crop production under rain fed conditions is subject to seasonality. Thus, other sources of income are needed to smooth consumption and income across the cropping season and post-harvest season. Under risky environments, risk-averse poor households tend to diversify sources of income away from agriculture to decrease risk ex ante. In adapting to these shocks, farmers in the project area have opted for animal rearing as a tertiary source of income. Engaging in livestock provides an opportunity to gain access to liquid assets that they can use during times of need specifically economic hardships while enhancing food security. During the socio-economic survey, 99% of the households have small ruminants with mainly include goats followed by poultry which suggests that most have adopted alternative approaches to achieving food security. The absence of large ruminants could be attributed to the fact that most households are still building their physical assets that would help them in adapting to the changing economic needs. Prior to the conflict, the Acholi people kept large numbers of cattle, which were a source of wealth and pride. Because much of the livestock was wiped out and virtually all other assets destroyed during the conflict, land has become the only resource for many. Restocking cattle populations could reduce the pressure on land. This is one of many policy tools that will need to be employed if future land disputes are to be mitigated. 2.2.8. General Information about Children On average each household has 1.447619 children under 5 years, 2.52 are of school going age, 2.07 are in primary school, 1.57 are in secondary school, while 1.42 are attending tertiary institutions. Although the USE and UPE programmes are in place, 14 many parents are still burdened with provision of scholastic materials and food amongst others and hence still have a high dependency ratio. School enrolment in Oyam has been on increase since inception of UPE from about 20,613 from inception of UPE in 1997 (10,817 boys and 9,796 girls), 97,506 in 2006 when Oyam started as a District to the present enrolment of 112,091 (57,043 boys and 55,048 girls). At household level, only 11.4% of survey respondents were of school going age but not attending school. As shown in the graph below, most of the children walk to school and hence any impact relating to relocating schools take into account the impact on children. Means of Transport for School Going Children 1% 8% Walk 23% Public Means Private Means 68% Others This assessment team has found that no physical infrastructure will be affected by this project and there is no impact on children in the affected villages relating to increased walking distance to schools that would reduce their performance. 2.2.9. Impaired Persons Previously referred to as disabled persons, persons with impairment are identified as vulnerable given the existing institutions that constrain their participation in all activities of life. Results from the socio-economic survey suggest that only 4% of the affected persons are living with some form of impairment. As shown in the graph below, of those who were impaired, only small percentages had physical, visual, mentally and hearing impairments. 15 Nature of Impairement in Project Affected Households 1%4% 1% 2% Hearing Visual Physical Mental Other 92% The category of other forms of impairment could include people living with HIV/AIDs or any other persons that are chronically ill including the elderly. The restoration packages proposed in this plan have taken care of these vulnerable groups. Against this background, PAPs were asked to identify the type of health facilities that they have access to. Results suggest that 52% have access to health facility III only 32% have access to referral hospitals. Access to Health Facilities in Project Area 0% 14% Hospital 32% Health facility IV Health facility III Health facility II Health facility I 52% 2% In terms of distance to the nearest health facility, the majority have to walk less than 5km to their nearest health facility. This means that in terms of health infrastructure, community members remain vulnerable and poor. According to the community, poor 16 health is one of the effects of poverty. It produces a vicious cycle. Poor health leads to inability to work, which in turn leads to failure to produce food/earn income. This eventually leads to poverty. A person who is in such a trap is vulnerable to disease and death. Distance to the Nearest Health Facility 250 200 Frequency 150 100 50 Series1 0 Less than 5 – 10km 10 or more 5km Distance Having appreciated the health vulnerability, the assessment team integrated these concerns in the design of the power line and when community members were asked whether they foresaw that the health facilities would be affected; 82% said that they would be affected while 18% said that they would not be affected. In the planning phase, such institutions were avoided. 2.2.10. Production Systems Understanding production systems in important in addressing gender production constraints at household level as they give an indication of the contribution of crops grown on affected plot affect total household income. Results suggest that on a scale of 1 – 10, there is a 50% chance that affected crops will have a significant impact on household incomes as shown in the graph below. 17 120 100 80 60 40 20 Std. Dev = 2.62 Mean = 3.9 0 N = 347.00 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 Impact of Food Grown on Affected Parce On Household Incomes The most predominant crop grown is maize and is considered as a cash crop for many households. The price of maize per kilo fluctuates depending on the production levels. At the moment a kilo goes for 200 Uganda Shillings. 400 300 200 100 Count 0 Maize Sweet potatoes Cassave Beans Crops Grown in Project Affected Household However, further analysis revealed that of those crops that are likely to be affected, most are either in the background of the plot or in the right of way. 18 200 100 Count 0 In the background of Farm Along the Right of W Project Impact on Crops 2.2.11. Social Network and Support System Given that no household will be physically relocated, the analysis on social networks and support system has been excluded from this baseline survey. Most community members will continue associating with community organizations in the area. 19 3. LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR LAND ACQUISITION AND COMPENSATION The legal framework of a RAP describes all laws, decrees, policies and regulations relevant to the resettlement activities associated with a project. Using the IFC guidelines, this RAP identifies, reviews and abides by all laws of the host country that are applicable to land acquisition and involuntary resettlement including the scope of the power of eminent domain and the nature of compensation associated with it, both the procedures for assessing compensation values and the schedule for making compensation payments; the legal and administrative procedures applicable, including the appeals process and the normal time for such procedures; land titling and registration procedures; and laws and regulations relating to the agencies responsible for implementing resettlement and those related to land compensation, consolidation, land use, environment, water use, and social welfare. The Constitution of the Republic of Uganda and the Land Act Cap 227 require that compensation is paid if a development project would damage structures or other property, or take private land. The same requirement is provided by World Bank policies and guidelines. World Bank’s Operational Policy 4.12 “Involuntary Resettlement" requires that displaced persons are compensated at full replacement cost and assisted during the relocation. While it is noted that no person shall be physically displaced by the project this section below, national laws and those of WB relevant to this RAP are discussed. 3.1.Relevant National Laws For land take and displacement of people, specific attention is drawn to two Ugandan laws that are applicable to land tenure, compensation and resettlement, namely: i) The Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, 1995 ii) The Land Act, Cap 227 a) The Constitution of the Republic of Uganda (1995) creates for government and local authorities a statutory power of compulsory acquisition of land in public interest, and makes provision, inter alia, for the “prompt payment of fair and adequate compensation� prior to the taking of possession of any privately-owned property. Such compensation is assessed in accordance with the valuation principles laid out in Section 78 of the Land Act (Cap 227), briefly outlined below: 20 i) The value for customary land is the open market value of unimproved land; ii) The value of buildings on the land is taken at open market value for urban areas, and depreciated replacement cost for rural areas; iii) The value of standing crops on the land is determined in accordance with the district compensation rates established by the respective District Land Board. Annual crops which could be harvested during the period of notice to vacate given to the landowner/ occupier of the land are excluded in determining compensation values; iv) In addition to the total compensation assessed, there is a disturbance allowance paid of 15% or, if less than six months’ notice to vacate is given, 30% of the total sum assessed. b) The Land Act principally addresses four issues namely; holding, control, management and land disputes. As regards tenure, the Act repeats, in Section 3, provisions of Article 237 of the Constitution which vests land ownership in the citizens of Uganda, to be held under customary, freehold, mailo or leasehold tenure systems. However, the Land Act provides for acquisition of land or rights to use land for public works. Regarding control of land use, the Act reaffirms statutory power of compulsory acquisition conferred on the government and local authorities under articles 26 (2) and 237(2) (a) of the Constitution (Section 43). Since the Act does not repeal the Land Acquisition Act No. 14 of 1965, it is assumed that this legislation, meets requirements of Article 26(2) of the Constitution that requires a law to be in place for the payment of compensation and access to the courts. The Act also requires that landowners manage and utilize land in accordance with regulatory land use planning (Sections 44 and 46). Section 77(2) of the revised edition (2000) of the Land Act 1998 provides for a disturbance allowance on top of the computed compensation amount as shown below: i) 30% of compensation amount if quit notice is given within 6 months. ii) 15% of compensation amount if quit notice is given after 6 months. The above will be two key legal instruments under which compensation and resettlement will be implemented in this RAP but there are other relevant laws as discussed below. 3.2.Other Laws 3.2.1. The Local Government Act (1997) Local Government Act 1997 provides for the system of Local Governments, which is based on the District. Under Kole, Gulu and Oyam (the districts traversed by the power 21 line) there are lower local governments and administrative units, namely Local Council I, II, II, IV and V. Chairperson of LC IV is the political head of a district while the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) is its technical head. This system provides for elected Councils whereby chairmen nominate the executive committee of each council, functions of which include: a.) Initiating and formulating policy for approval by council; b.) Overseeing the implementation of Government and Council policies, and monitoring and coordinating activities of Non-Government Organizations in the district; and c.) Receiving and solving disputes forwarded to it from lower local governments. 3.2.2. Land Acquisition Act (1965) This Act makes provision for procedures and method of compulsory acquisition of land for public purposes whether for temporary or permanent use. The Minister responsible for land may authorize any person to enter upon the land, survey the land, dig or bore the subsoil or any other actions necessary for ascertaining whether the land is suitable for a given public purpose. However, compensation should be paid to any person who suffers damage as a result of such actions. The Land Acquisition Act stops at payment of compensation to affected people. In Uganda, it is not a legal requirement for a project to purchase alternative land for affected people. Once affected people are promptly and adequately compensated, the project proponent’s obligations stop at this extent and there is no legal requirement or provision that people should be moved or provided with alternative land. Therefore, in Ugandan legal context, once people are compensated, they are expected to vacate affected properties without further claim and in this lies a major contrast with WB requirements. 3.2.3. Land Tenure Regimes and Transfer of Land Article 237 of the Constitution, 1995, vests land ownership in citizens of Uganda and identifies four land tenure systems, namely: customary; freehold; mailo; and leasehold. The incidents of these systems are detailed under Section 4 of the Land Act (Cap 227). These tenure systems are provided relevant to the road project are outlined below: 3.2.3.1. Customary Tenure The customary tenure is the most dominant tenure arrangement in the Acholi region. Important attributes include the following: 22  The tenure is governed by rules generally accepted as binding and authoritative by the class of persons to which it applies. In other words customary regime is not governed by written law.  Land is owned in perpetuity.  Customary occupants are occupant of former public land, and occupy land by virtue of their customary rights; they have proprietary interest in the land and are entitled to certificates of customary ownership which may be acquired through application to the Parish Land Committee and eventual issuance by the District Land Board. 3.2.3.2.Freehold Tenure A number of households have free hold tenure and this tenure has the following attributes:  This tenure derives its legality from the Constitution of Uganda and its incidents from the written law.  It involves the holding of land in perpetuity or for a period less than perpetuity fixed by a condition.  It enables the holder to exercise, subject to the law, full powers of ownership. 3.2.3.3.Leasehold Tenure This tenure system is:  Created either by contract or by operation of the law;  A form under which the landlord of lessor grants the tenant or lessee exclusive possession of the land, usually for a period defined and in return for a rent;  The tenant has security of tenure and a proprietary interest in the land. Although only these latter forms of tenure are legally defined under the Land Act, the context of common law also recognizes the statute of “Licensee� or “Sharecroppers�, these terms having similar meanings in practice. Licensees are persons granted authority to use land within for agricultural production. Traditionally, such production would be limited to annual crops. Licensees have no legal security of tenure or any propriety right in the land. Their tenure is purely contractual. 3.2.3.4.Mailo Tenure The Mailo Land Tenure was not found in most of the villages that are covered by the project area 23 3.2.3.5.Right of Spouse and Children The rights of spouse and children are protected under the Constitution of Uganda and the Land Act (Cap 227). The consent of spouse and children must be acquired prior to any transaction by the head of household on land on which the family ordinarily resides. Section 40 of the Land Act, 1998 requires that no person shall: a. Sell, exchange, transfer, pledge, mortgage or lease any land; or enter into any contract for the sale, exchange, transfer, pledge, mortgage or lease of any land; b. Give away any land inter vivos, or enter into any transaction in respect of land:  In the case of land on which the person ordinarily resides with his or her spouse, and from which they derive their sustenance, except with the prior written consent of the spouse;  In the case of land on which the person ordinarily resides with his or her dependent children of majority age, except with the prior written consent of the dependent children of majority age;  In the case of land on which the person ordinarily resides with his or her dependent children below the majority age, except with the prior written consent of the Committee1;  In the case of land on which ordinarily reside orphans below majority age with interest in inheritance of the land, except with prior written consent of the Committee. 3.3.Valuation and Compensation of Assets Land take, compensation and relocation were the most frequent issues of debate encountered during consultations with PAP. Hence, at the core of this RAP is an aim to ensure project development embraces equitable and appropriate compensation approaches that meet Ugandan law and international requirements. Valuation and compensation are in accordance with rates set at district level for crops and “non-permanent� structures. The rates, which are enacted by District Land Boards, are established and updated at District level. Permanent structures are valued on a case- by-case basis. However, to meet World Bank requirements, in some cases, additional compensation measures will have to be identified by the Project in order to ensure that all households improve, or at least restore, their livelihoods and standards of living. Since no household will be moved by the project, this applies to income restoration where roadside businesses are temporarily disrupted or lost. 1 “Committees “ are defined under Section 65 of the Land Act ; they are Parish Land Committees. 24 3.4.World Bank Requirements World Bank’s Operational Policy 4.12 on involuntary resettlement requires that affected persons should be compensated at full replacement cost and assisted during relocation. There are some stark gaps between Uganda and WB resettlement requirements. For example, as earlier mentioned, a project proponents are not legally bound to neither procure alternative land nor provide relocation assistance to affected people if they provided fair financial compensation based on a legally accepted valuation process. In a number of situations, as shown in table above, WBG requirements are more favorable to affected persons than Ugandan law. REA is committed to undertaking appropriate compensation approaches to meet both Ugandan law and World Bank requirements such as; a.) Compensating for loss of income after affected persons are displaced. b.) Compensation for tenants who might not have legal land rights, but have undertaken development or farming activities on affected land. c.) Wherever feasible and acceptable to affected persons, provide land-for-land compensation. d.) Provide property owners with cash compensation at full replacement cost. e.) Wherever appropriate, provide skills assistance to affected farmers in areas such as improved crop and animal husbandry and records keeping. However, regarding to project impacts identified in this RAP a gap analysis was undertaken so as to plan for unforeseen circumstances. Table 1: analysis of gaps between World Bank Requirements and Ugandan requirements Impact World Bank requirement Uganda requirement Gaps and how these will be addressed Loss of Compensation for crops, Sharecroppers: Not entitled to Gap. crops and trees, and other fixed assets at compensation for land, entitled to trees full replacement cost and compensation for crops. Crops and temporary structures should be sufficient to enable affected have been documented in affected people to restore Annual (seasonal) crops: No this report and will be compensated. their standard of living after compensation since the 3 or 6- A disturbance allowance will be paid resettlement. month notice is supposed to allow to overcome any time delays. people to harvest their annual crops. Perennial crops: Cash For perennial crops, compensation compensation based upon rates will be based on estimated income per square meter lost for 3 years, so as to provide /bush/tree/plant established at replacement value. A disturbance District level plus disturbance allowance will be paid as per Uganda allowance (15% or 30%). Rates are law. calculated as the one-year net agricultural income. Disturbance allowance is meant to compensate 25 the re-establishment period for these crops. Loss of Compensation for structures Owners of “Permanent� Gap. structures should cover full replacement Buildings: and other cost exclusive of depreciation Valuation by valuer + disturbance improveme and inclusive of all fees (such allowance (15%). Valuation is nts (fences, as construction permits and based on depreciated market etc) title charges) and labour costs. value. Where affected project will provide including compensation based on replacement communal Walls: classed as permanent value. This will include the payment structures structures, but value calculated on of government valuation rates and investment method. payment of a disturbance allowance. However, no permanent structures Owners of “Non-permanent� are likely to be affected. Buildings: Cash compensation based upon rates per square meter established at District level plus disturbance allowance (15%). Note: Rates are based on depreciated market value. Tenants of structures: repayment of unused rent, and 6 months notice to vacate structure. Fences: barbed wire fences valued by government rate, based on the investment method. 26 4. INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES In implementing this resettlement action plan, three key stakeholders have been identified including the Ministry of Local Government, Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development and REA. 4.1.Rural Electrification Agency REA has a lean management structure comprising of four departments responsible for Project Planning, Project Monitoring & Evaluation, Public Information & Outreach, and Finance & Administration, respectively. The Agency has, in addition, positions of Internal Audit and Legal Services (reporting to the Board). An Environmental Officer has recently been recruited to address and ensure compliance to social and environmental safeguards. Therefore in implementing this RAP, this official will oversee the implementation with support from the Project Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation Unit. However, given its lean structure, a consultant is likely to implement the RAP 4.2.Ministry of Local Government The staff at the district level and sub county level is mandated to ensure that there are minimal disruptions in communities. The District Environment Officers, Community Development Officers and the Sub County Chiefs have been actively involved in the planning processes for this RAP. This is in line with the national policies and guidelines of the Government of Uganda and is done to ensure equitable compensation and minimize social disruptions or negative effects on people’s livelihoods arising from construction of roads. Compensations assist those who have lost assets as a result of a development project to maintain their livelihood through income restoration. Local Councils are responsible for local policy matters, economic development, resolving local conflicts and providing orderly leadership and democratic practices at the grass roots level in their respective areas. The system has facilitated mass participation in government affairs and awakened the rural population to their rights of citizenship and obligations particularly regarding involvement in development programs and projects. In the project-affected area LC1s and LC3s are very active and directly interact with the affected population. These councils will thus be helpful during identification of rightful property owners and resolving compensation grievances. 4.3. Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development The Chief Government Valuer in the Valuation Division in the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development is responsible for approving the Valuation Roll. This demands fair and transparent compensation and as such all property valued are first inspected by the Chief Government Valuer. Chief Government Valuer’s office is also involved in resolving public complaints that arise from land acquisition valuations and compensation payments. 27 4.4. Related Line Ministries The Government of Uganda recognizes energy as a key input in all sectors. The implementation of rural electrification therefore, necessitated a multi-sectoral approach. The project design includes specific components for key sectors namely; Health, Education, Water, Local Government, Private Sector, Community Based Organizations and Financial Institutions. 4.4.1. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development The Minister of Energy and Mineral Development is the principal political head responsible for Electricity policy formulation, planning and development. The Ministry prepares the Energy Policy and Strategic Plans. The Minister appoints the members of the Rural Electrification Board. In the RAP implementation, REA will be guided by the scrotal polices and guidelines regarding compensation for affected persons. 4.4.2. Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries Considering that most of affected items are trees and crops, the The Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry & Fisheries would be brought on board to help support livelihood restoration strategies. The agricultural modernization program (PMA and NAADS) could be used as opportunities for increasing incomes by raising farm productivity through use of appropriate energy. Additionally, the Energy for Rural Transformation (ERT) agricultural support component has identified key projects where energy is a major constraint like coffee, tea and fish processing; horticulture production, processing and marketing; dairy and poultry production. It is also developing subsidy guidelines. Rural Electrification Agency (REA) should provide the leadership for policy guidelines to ensure effective coordination and harmonization of incentive measures for Rural Electrification development in the country. 4.4.3. Ministry of Health The Ministry of Health is involved in energy projects targeting improvement of health institutions, diagnostic services/laboratory equipment, cold storage for blood and vaccines, water supply pumping and heating, communication, health education and data management. The strategy is to use electricity and other renewable sources of energy to improve energy efficiency and management in the health sector. Once again, Rural Electrification Agency (REA) is a major player in establishing demand trends and patterns and ensuring coordinated efforts. 4.4.4. Ministry of Education and Sports The Ministry of Education & Sports, through its Department of Education Planning (DEP), is interested in rural electrification to facilitate improvement of the quality of education in rural areas and develop energy policy guidelines for energy and Information Communication Technology (ICT) in post-primary education. A pilot phase is already underway in some 10 districts. Ministry of Education and Sports is, therefore, REA’s important client in terms of meeting the ministry’s expectations. 28 4.4.5. Ministry of Water, Lands and Environment The Ministry of Water, Lands & Environment’s Department of Water Development (DWD) aims to improve water supply services through adaptation of appropriate energy packages to water supply systems in small towns and rural growth centres. Fourteen towns are targeted under the pilot phase. Rural Electrification Agency (REA) has to encourage investment in small power projects to support realization of the vision of “water for all� within the shortest time possible. 4.4.6. Ministry of Works, Housing and Communication The Ministry of Works, Housing & Communications is responsible for infrastructure policy and development including roads and communications, crucial for successful development of Rural Electrification. Ministry of Works, Housing & Communications also participates in the annual meetings of stakeholders. 4.4.7. Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development The Ministry of Finance, Planning & Economic Development is responsible for mobilization of development funds within the framework of the Poverty Eradication Action Plan (PEAP). Accordingly, the Poverty Monitoring and Analysis Unit in the ministry undertake regular Monitoring & Evaluation of Rural Electrification to assess the impact of the initiatives on the quality of life of the people. REA has to coordinate its Monitoring & Evaluation strategies and operations with the ministry. 4.5.Implementation Schedule Having assigned the different organizational responsibilities, this team anticipates that the RAP implementation is likely to cover a period of 13 months. The sequencing of activities bears in mind that some activities can be undertaken at the same time. Details are shown in the table below. Table 2: RAP Implementation Schedule Activities 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 RAP Approval RAP Disclosure Agreement with Entitlements Compensation Payment Contractor Begins work, Grievance Management RAP Monitoring Completion Audit 29 5. COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK This section is a presentation of the compensation framework that include a description of the compensation guidelines established by the Government of Uganda; the methodology used to value losses, the proposed types and levels of compensation to be paid, the compensation and assistance eligibility criteria and how the compensation will be paid. 5.1.Key Principles The key principles committed upon by REA in this RAP are the following: - Resettlement and compensation of Project-Affected People (PAP) will be carried out in compliance with Ugandan legislation, IFC’s Performance Standard 5 and WB OP 4.12, - All physically or economically displaced people will be offered an option between either a full resettlement package, including the provision of replacement residential land and a house, or cash compensation, - Past experience in Uganda has shown that cash compensation, although very sought after by many household heads, could be detrimental in the medium term, to other household members, particularly the females and children; the Project will make every effort to promote resettlement rather than cash compensation, and this plan is designed accordingly, - The economies in the affected villages are largely agro-based and that most households are just beginning to restore their livelihoods after a war. Hence compensation measures have taken into account this vulnerability context, - The RAP will be implemented in a gender-sensitive manner: consents of female spouses will be sought, as provided by Ugandan regulations, - Given that REA works through partnerships with lead Government Ministries, the Agency will help link PAP’ that will help them in restoring their affected livelihoods, and will provide transitional assistance as necessary as long as livelihoods are not restored to their previous level; specific livelihood restoration activities will target women, - The RAP implementation and outcomes will be monitored and evaluated as part of a transparent process, - PAPs be informed and consulted during the whole course of RAP development, implementation and evaluation. 5.1.1. Compensation and Resettlement Packages Information from the socio-economic survey and census guided the selection of the most appropriate compensation packages while bearing in mind the scenarios below. 5.1.1.1.The Affected Household Is Neither Physically Nor Economically Displaced 30 This means in practice that the remaining land is deemed economically viable and no residential building has to be removed. Such situations of rather benign impact apply to the overwhelming majority of affected households. In these cases, cash compensation will be offered and no resettlement option will be offered. Cash compensation will be at District Land Board rates for land, crops, and structures, with payment of disturbance allowance as per Ugandan regulations. An uplift will be added to this compensation to meet full replacement value requirements, as rates established by District Land Boards usually do not meet this requirement. 5.1.1.2.The Affected Household Is Physically Displaced but not Economically Affected The construction of a replacement house will be offered wherever the residential building has to be removed or relocated nearby. Depending on situations, resettlement may involve the construction of a replacement house: - either on the remaining part of the plot if the remaining land holding in the neighborhood of the affected plot is deemed economically viable, or if the household’s livelihood is not based on agriculture, and if the affected household agrees to such a solution; in such cases, no replacement agricultural land will have to be provided and the household will simply continue to use the land they previously farmed or continue to engage in their non- agricultural activities, while dwelling in their new residence;- or on another resettlement plot if the remainder of the affected plot is not economically viable; in such situations, replacement agricultural land of similar potential will also have to be provided in the vicinity of the residential resettlement plot. Residential land will be provided to resettlers under secure tenure (either freehold or very long term leases), regardless of the previous regime of occupation. Agricultural land will be provided under the same regime of occupation as the land it replaces in the previous location. 5.1.1.3.The Affected Household Is Economically Displaced but not Physically Displaced In such situations, the residential building of the affected household is not affected, but land take is such that their agricultural sustainability is jeopardized. In these situations, compensation will be provided through the provision of replacement agricultural land, with or without physical relocation of the homestead, depending on whether replacement land is available in the vicinity. Given the nature of the development, situation 1 was selected as the most appropriate on the basis that although a 10 meter is needed to set up the way leave, the land owner can continue to utilize land under the way leave for crops but not trees. No structures will be demolished but rather if found that some will be affected, the line will be diverted. Furthermore, while trees are not allowed under the wayleaves, cash compensation is proposed for trees and crops affected. Hence, cash compensation will 31 be at District Land Board rates for land, crops, and structures, with payment of disturbance allowance as per Ugandan regulations. 5.2.Eligibility The basis of valuation for compensation lies in the constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995 and the Land Act 1998  The Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, 1995, Article 26 a.) Every person has a right to own property either individually or in association with others. b.) No person shall be compulsorily deprived of property or any interest in or right over property of any description except where the following conditions are satisfied a. The taking of possession or acquisition is necessary for public use or in the interest of defense, public safety, public order, public morality or public health; and b. The compulsory taking of possession or acquisition of property is made under a law, which makes provision i. Prompt payment of fair and adequate compensation, prior to the taking of possession or acquisition of the property; and ii. A right of access to a court of law by any person who has an interest or right over the property.  The Land Act, 1998: a.) The District Land Tribunal shall, in assessing compensation referred to in paragraph (b) of subsection (1) of section 77 take into account the following:- a. In the case of a customary owner, the value of land shall be the Market Value of the unimproved land; b. The value of the buildings, which shall be taken at Market Value in urban areas and Depreciated Replacement Cost in rural areas; c. The value of standing crops on the land, excluding annual crops which could be harvested during the period of notice given to the owner, tenant or licence. b.) In addition to compensation assessed under this section, there shall be paid as a Disturbance Allowance of fifteen per cent or if less that six months’ notice to give vacant possession is given, thirty present of any sum assessed under subsection (1) of this section. c.) The rates set out in the list of District Compensation Rates referred to in paragraph (e) of subsection (1) of section 60 of this Act shall be used in determining the amount of compensation payable. The crops, trees and other assets likely to be damaged affected recorded on compensation assessment were carefully analyzed and rates applied and computations 32 made to determine the compensation payable to the PAPs. The handwritten information on the assessment form including the location of every individual PAP, entries of crops/trees and the rates applied were typed to produce schedules for the valuation report of the PAP study. These are the guiding principles and strategies used to establish what and who should qualify to be assessed for compensation payment:- i. TORs emphasize physical identification, verification and valuation for compensation of properties to be affected/damaged by the construction of the power line and not acquisition of wayleaves. ii. Valuation and assessment of properties to be based on approved area district compensation rates. iii. Land and buildings to be left out except if considered adversely affected/damaged by the construction of the proposed power line. iv. Trees in forests owned by government to be paid if claimed by individual complainants who have licenses/permits. v. Complainants/Claimants to retain copy of the field assessment form. vi. Compensation Assessment to cover only crops and trees to be destroyed/affected during the survey and construction of the power line vii. Obtain consents from registered land owners and occupants in accordance with the law. viii. Assess damage of destroyed crops/trees found in the road reserves such as fruit trees and perennial crops. ix. Disturbance Allowance of 15% be allowed x. Prepare separate compensation assessment reports for the whole proposed line route. 5.3.Rates Applied Due to lack of Area Compensation Rates for newly created districts of Oyam and Kole, the consultant applied/used the current Area Compensation Rates of Gulu district to arrive at the compensation awards to the PAPs. 5.3.1. General Remarks and Assumptions Inspection, survey and data capture of the affected property were carried out in the presence of the PAPs or their representatives, local leaders LCI officials of the villages and the neighbors. In urban centers where plots for building were genuinely affected by the proposed power line, assessment for compensation was done on full value. Assessment of crops and economic trees was carried out using Gulu District Area Compensation Rates. In commercial forest assessment was limited to 10 meters wayleaves corridor and more trees may be affected during the construction of the power line. A Statutory Disturbance Allowance of 15% as been allowed. Details of assessment/valuation of every claimant’s properties have been provided in this report. 33 5.3.2. Cut-off Date The date of the valuation/assessment is November 2010 5.3.3. Valuation Certificate There are Eighty Four (84) affected villages, in Kole, Oyam and Gulu Districts. The total number of claimants is 1143 and the assessed total compensation is Shs.95,675,252/- (Ninety Five Million Six Hundred Seventy Five Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Two Thousand Shillings Only). A summary of affected crops and trees as well as the numbers of affected persons are presented in the table below. Item Name of Village Number of Value of crops/Trees 15% Dist Total Compensation Affected Persons Allowance Award 1. Corner Mowlem 13 490,125 73,519 563,644 2. Te-Okole 11 979,000 146,850 1,125,850 3. Acero ‘A’ 11 195,500 29,325 224,825 4. Alyat ‘A’ 4 115,500 17,325 132,825 5. Alyat ‘B’ 17 600,000 90,000 690,000 6. Acero ‘B’ 9 743,000 111,450 854,450 7. Acero ‘A’ 10 125,500 18,825 144,325 8. Ajaya 24 1,304,000 195,600 1,499,600 9. Aguga ‘A’ 16 338,000 50,700 388,700 10. Alidi ‘A’ 3 1,196,000 179,400 1,375,400 11. Ongor 33 1,982,775 297,416 2,280,191 12. Atyeto ‘A’ 7 366,500 54,975 421,475 13. Komcankweri 8 4,127,000 619,050 4,746,050 14. Pip 3 218,000 32,700 250,700 15. Iyanyi ‘A’ 5 157,000 23,550 180,550 16. Iyanyi ‘B’ 8 448,000 67,200 515,200 17. Obinga Omii 8 607,851 91,178 699,029 18. Adyeda 7 321,680 48,252 369,932 19. Anyalo 17 757,400 113,610 871,010 20. Odong Oyere 6 582,300 87,345 669,645 21. Akaidebe ‘B’ 33 1,565,500 234,825 1,800,325 22. Akaoidebe ‘A’ 3 1,798,000 269,700 2,067,700 23. Alica 17 2,033,750 305,063 2,338,813 24. Acan Koma 11 1,903,825 285,574 2,189,399 25. Barmwony 14 1,782,500 267,375 2,049,875 26. Barlye C 16 6,233,125 934,969 7,168,094 27. Otwe 17 1,253,750 188,063 1,441,813 34 28. Abongo Okere 8 1,467,326 220,099 1,687,425 29. Aboloneno 43 1,374,000 206,100 1,580,100 30. Awe Ikwo 36 1,650,500 247,575 1,898,075 31. Dam Amalo 20 1,133,225 169,984 1,303,209 32. Dam Apiny 10 879,000 131,850 1,010,850 33. Lwala 8 746,500 111,975 858,475 34. Alobo Lac 15 266,000 39,900 305,900 35. Barcal 21 1,010,252 151,538 1,161,790 36. Adak ‘B’ 12 515,500 77,325 592,825 37. Adak ‘A’ 33 2,023,750 303,563 2,327,313 38. Alyec 10 1,977,000 296,550 2,273,550 39. Twocan Ikweri 4 137,000 20,550 157,550 40. Cekwere 7 341,500 51,225 392,725 41. Corner Atapara 14 1,588,138 238,221 1,826,359 42. Abuli 9 450,825 67,624 518,449 43. Awelo Makweri 28 1,919,525 287,929 2,207,454 44. Oketo Bito 4 2,772,000 415,800 3,187,800 45. Awaripiny 11 473,288 70,993 544,281 46. Okarawok 17 1,038,500 155,775 1,194,275 47. Arok 6 136,250 20,438 156,688 48. Dog Abam 2 211,000 31,650 242,650 49. Amukugungu 5 235,500 35,325 270,825 50. Kamdini town 19 1,310,500 196,575 1,507,075 51. Abanya ‘B’ 5 339,500 50,925 390,425 52. Abanya ‘A’ 18 1,043,800 156,570 1,200,370 53. Alyec 21 1,974,500 296,175 2,270,675 54. Pukica 8 261,000 39,150 300,150 55. Boroboro ‘B’ 9 366,500 54,975 421,475 56. Boroboro ‘A’ 9 221,000 33,150 254,150 57. Barolimo 6 132,000 19,800 151,800 58. Aruku Long 6 352,000 52,800 404,800 59. Abang Trading 17 565,163 84,774 649,937 centre 60. Abako 10 251,788 37,768 289,556 61. Amwa trading 36 2,049,375 307,406 2,356,781 centre 62. Amwa 17 681,118 102,168 783,286 Headquarters 63. Waring 17 439,200 65,880 505,080 64. Opati ‘B’ 2 224,000 33,600 257,600 65. Opati ‘A’ 5 243,000 36,450 279,450 66. Lango 14 395,250 59,288 454,538 67. Bobi 12 1,081,875 162,281 1,244,156 35 68. Teyao 3 68,650 10,298 78,948 69. Omolo 13 925,188 138,778 1,063,966 70. Alati ‘A’ 9 218,893 32,834 251,727 71. Arak East 22 1,195,000 179,250 1,374,250 72. Odyanyo 1 4,000 600 4,600 73. Akuki East 29 1,053,804 158,071 1,211,875 74. Alolekwe 3 167,113 25,067 192,180 75. Ngutcati 19 910,926 136,639 1,047,565 76. Coo Pe Bwone 2 2,089,875 313,481 2,403,356 77. Centre ‘B’ 15 1,090,786 163,618 1,254,404 78. Minakulu trading 40 1,321,500 198,225 1,519,725 centre 79. Aromonyongo 22 3,740,500 561,075 4,301,575 80. Idipo 20 1,011,875 151,781 1,163,656 81. Obalowat 12 130,428 19,564 149,992 82. Awii Mon Ward 14 683,903 102,585 786,488 83. Kulu Otit 18 1,201,300 180,195 1,381,495 84. Pato trading 16 878,401 131,760 1,010,161 centre 1143 83,195,871 12,479,381 95,675,255 36 6. RESETTLEMENT ASSISTANCE AND RESTORATION OF LIVELIHOODS Wherever possible, the Government of Uganda tries to avoid or minimize the displacement of people by exploring alternative project designs The Rural Electriction Agency guided by the Wayleaves Act, provides for realignment of power lines in order to minimize displacement of households or businesses. International guidelines like the IFC recommends that project sponsors undertake the following actions on behalf of all affected people, including members of the host communities in which displaced people will be settled: 6.1.Livelihood Restoration Strategies The livelihood restoration strategies proposed, aim at increasing participation of all stakeholders so that affected persons do not become more vulnerable. Hence this team has undertaken the following in order to ensure that affected persons are not significantly affected. a.) The team informed affected people of their options and rights concerning resettlement; b.) Provided technically and economically feasible options for resettlement based on consultation with affected people and assessment of resettlement alternatives; c.) Given that no physical relocation is required, the team has not provided affected people with prompt and effective compensation at full replacement value for loss of assets due to project activities; but only compensation for crops; d.) Since no physical relocation is necessary, disturbance allowance has been factored in the compensation package e.) It is recommended therefore, that where necessary, affected persons be linked to other projects that can provide them with development assistance in addition to compensation for lost assets described above such as land preparation, agricultural inputs, and credit facilities and for training and employment opportunities. 6.2.Special Assistance for Women and Vulnerable Groups The Resettlement Planning team identifies this as the most appropriate option for resettlement assistance and livelihood restoration given that although women form a small percentage of the affected households, the nature of tenure agreements in Northern Uganda that is customary in nature makes women more vulnerable to access to productive resources. As a result women tend to suffer more than men as a result of social changes. Therefore throughout the development of this RAP some of the immediate and practical measures are proposed to improve women’s adaptation to resettlement including:  ensuring that land titles and compensation entitlements are issued in the name of both spouses; 37  reducing women’s workloads by providing, for example, standpipes, hand pumps, grinding mills, woodlots, fuel efficient stoves, ox carts, and plows by linking them to other projects like NUSAF, NAADS, LGSMD that are implementing such activities;  improving health services by providing training for village midwives, primary health care centers, child spacing/family planning counseling, clean water supply, and sanitation training by linking them to development partners in specific locations;  improving family services by providing immunizations; and  Increasing incomes by setting up credit groups, skills training, and access to markets. 38 7. PUBLIC CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Considering that the project has both environmental and social impacts, consultation was not a single conversation but a series of opportunities to create understanding about the project among those it has affected or and those it is likely to affect or interest, and to learn how these external parties view the project and its attendant risks, impacts, opportunities, and mitigation measures. Listening to stakeholder concerns and feedback gave the team valuable source of information that can improve project design and outcomes and help a company to identify and control external risks. It can also form the basis for future collaboration and partnerships. For stakeholders, a company’s consultation process is an opportunity to get information, as well as to educate company staff about the local context in which a project will take place, to raise issues and concerns, ask questions, and potentially help shape the project by making suggestions for the company to consider and respond to. 7.1.Community Perceptions of the Project Generally, most communities that were consulted were happy with the proposed project. They noted that some of the villages were previously connected to power but the facilities got vandalized during the war. It was observed that most of the trading centres had the potential to grow like Corner Mowlem but this was hampered by no power in the area. Most communities wondered when the actual work would begin given the need for power in schools, health centres and other related infrastructure including the trading centre. 7.2.Community Concerns 7.2.1. Impact on Property and Cultural Sites Aside from the development, local leaders urged the team to compensate affected persons given that they were still restoring their livelihoods. Some community members were concerned about the impact of the power line on cemeteries and graveyards. However, they were informed that REA was going to use the road reserve so their areas will not be heavily affected. In addition to this community members raised concerns regarding payment for the crops destroyed, and were informed on the crops that would be identified during the census and valued. However, there was need for PAPs to cooperate with the team so that the identification process was undertaken in a participatory manner including affected persons and their leaders as witnesses. Furthermore, community members wondered whether there would be any impact on structures and whether property would be lost. The team allayed these fears noting that since most of the work would be done in the road reserve, it was unlikely that any structure would be affected. Another community member wondered what he would do if he wanted to build on his land that already has a pole. For safety concerns, he was advised to construct 15meters from the pole and for others who wished that a mango 39 should not be cut down but rather pruned, they were advised that trees were not allowed under the wayleaves and would have to be compensated. 7.2.2. Compensation Framework On the compensation framework, one community member wondered whether compensation rates were negotiable suggesting that previous rates that have been found to be unfavorable. However, members were informed that some items like trees and poles for fences are fixed based on the district compensation rates generated by District Land Board. The compensation rates are updated every year to address price changes and inflation issues. Others wondered what the method of compensation would be adopted. They are informed that the results from the socio-economic survey and census would serve as an input in the method of compensation though cash compensation has been found to be the preferred option by most PAPs. 7.2.3. Community Benefits Other concerns were relating to access to the power including whether they would be given a transformer or whether they would get security lights in their areas. Furthermore, community members wondered whether community infrastructure close to the line would be connected to the power line will pass nearby their school (primary) will government give the primary school power. They were informed that after the installation, the facility would be given to the relevant authorities that would ably meet these needs. Community members wondered whether they will be given work to help in putting up the power line and were informed that should transmission come, employment opportunities would be availed where need. Members suggested that some of the opportunities that they should benefit from include cutting of trees, clearing of land and digging holes. 7.2.4. Community Health and Safety Regarding community health and safety, one community member wondered whether if a pole fells and killed someone what would Government compensate the affected one. The team informed members that there are laws that address issues of workers’ compensation and these are planned for in the Environmental and Social Management Plan. The contractor is mandated to comply with provision of working gear that protects the lives of the workforce. 7.2.5. Grievance Mechanism On grievances, one community member narrated that previous power line planners did not compensate them for the crops lost and wondered what procedure they should use in case they have complaints. Considering that there is no structure at the moment, they were advised to inform or report this to the RDC. However, a grievance mechanism has been recommended in this report to manage the grievance process. 40 8. GRIEVANCE MECHANISM Regardless of its scale, involuntary resettlement inevitably gives rise to grievances among the affected population over issues ranging from rates of compensation and eligibility criteria to the location of resettlement sites and the quality of services at those sites. Timely redress of such grievances is vital to the satisfactory implementation of resettlement and to completion of the project on schedule. There is need to ensure that procedures are in place to allow affected people to lodge a complaint or a claim (including claims that derive from customary law and usage) without cost and with the assurance of a timely and satisfactory resolution of that complaint or claim. In addition, the project may have to make special accommodations for women and members of vulnerable groups to ensure that they have equal access to grievance redress procedures. Such accommodation may include employment of women or members of vulnerable groups to facilitate the grievance redress process or to ensure that group representing the interests of women and other vulnerable groups take part in the process. 8.1.Mechanisms of Grievance and Appeals In this regard, this resettlement planning team proposes that grievances are best redressed through project management, local government staff, political leadership and customary leaders. The traditional mechanisms for conflict resolution in the Acholi region have been widely used in providing psychosocial support for post conflict process management. 8.1.1. Reconciliatory Procedure This is an informal mechanism that will be applied to reach a resolution whenever minor contradictions and disagreements that may occur. It will include and oral or written appeal to the community based conflict resolution structure constituting of 1 member of the RAP implementation team (consultant), Sub County Chief/Community Development Officer, one Political Leader, 2 Elders and I religious leader . In order to build credibility of the commission, it is important that it includes different stakeholders that bring on board agreed principles and values that are attached to the Acholi Region. This approach is a mutual coordination mechanism to guarantee that mutual interests are served and disputes and contradictions are solved. 8.1.2. Written Complaints to REA When the complainant is dissatisfied and feels that a member of the RAP implementation unit in the community has infringed upon his legal rights and interests or is dissatisfied with the decision made he or she can write to the REA to lodge a written complaint. This complaint should be addressed within two weeks of receipt. 41 8.1.3. Legal Redress If the complainant feels dissatisfied with the administrative arbitration decision by the REA under the supervision of the Environmental and Social Safeguards officer, the complainant will then seek legal redress in courts of law. If the complainant is not satisfied with the decision made above, he or she may logde an appeal to the civil court and an independent will be set up to supervise and inspect the compensation process. 8.2. Public Disclosure Project Affected persons will be informed of this mechanism during the RAP disclosure for their input and refinement so that they can fully understand their rights for grievance and appeal. When grievance and appeal happen, the related institutions including Village committee, REA should keep good record about it, and make it available to the external monitor for inspection and verification. 42 9. MONITORING, EVALUTION AND REPORTING FRAMEWORK The purpose of monitoring and evaluation for this RAP will be to report about the effectiveness of the implementation of the RAP, covering resettlement, disbursement of compensation and effectiveness of public involvement, amongst others. Monitoring and purposeful evaluation will be key factors for successful resettlement activities. Monitoring will also entail evaluation of effectiveness of the grievance management process. The monitoring Framework proposed in this RAP includes a review of financial disbursements, compensation complaints and grievance redress, adherence to compensation payment schedule, support of vulnerable PAPs. The Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) mechanism provides a basis to assess overall success and effectiveness of various resettlement processes and measures. This mechanism is based on two components: a) Internal monitoring – undertaken by the implementation unit / Monitoring Officer in the Planning Department of REA; and, b) External evaluations –by development partners, community development officers and/or environmental focal persons at district level and other national stakeholders. 9.1. Internal monitoring process The specific objectives and tasks of the internal monitoring process include: a.) identification of suitable indicators; b.) Measurement of indicators at appropriate intervals; c.) creation of a mechanism to analyze M&E data against a pre-resettlement baseline; and d.) Setting up a system to regularly respond to M&E findings by adapting existing measures or by modifying implementation processes. This monitoring process will be used to analyze progress and change at regular intervals. It shall be linked to the various stages of the RAP, as follows:- 9.1.1. During resettlement During resettlement, M&E should focus on resettlement issues such as:  Number of families that have been compensated;  Number of people who have acquired legal papers to new property,  Number of business owners who have restored their businesses,  Efficiency and effectiveness of grievance redress mechanism. 43 9.1.2. After resettlement Post resettlement monitoring should focus on rehabilitation issues and status on each of the measures should be assessed, for example:  Success level of restoration of livelihoods  Success level of restoration of assets  Efficiency and effectiveness of grievance redress mechanism. 9.1.3. Key Activities and Responsibilities i) Set up a system: The RAP implementation team will provide a monitoring form to be completed monthly by the M&E officer at each sub-county. The forms will cover aspects in Section 10.1.1 above. The information collected will be entered in an existing database at REA for further analysis and compilation into quarterly reports. ii) Ongoing Monitoring: The M&E Officer for each location will be in-charge of regular monitoring of the implementation process. This will involve: a) Feedback and inputs from the Implementation Officers. b) Reviewing of the resettlement database. c) Receiving reports from Grievance Officer and of the grievance database. d) Receiving information from local representatives. e) Direct consultation with the resettled community at each location. iii) Monthly reports: Consolidated monthly reports with key findings from the on- going monitoring should be submitted to the implementation team and discussed every month and action points determined. This monthly progress review should aim to ensure that important issues are immediately rectified. iv) Vulnerability assessment: It is essential that vulnerability is closely monitored in order to provide timely support to susceptible households. A vulnerability assessment shall occur as part of quarterly auditing of all households, and those households that are most vulnerable shall be prioritized for monthly auditing and targeted assistance. This may be undertaken by the implementation Officer. Key activities are: a) Develop a set of criteria to identify vulnerable households (Note that this is intended to act as a guideline only and should be modified as appropriate). b) Every three months visit vulnerable households to assess key needs/ issues (e.g. unemployment) with the rehabilitation process. c) Develop a plan to address these issues in conjunction with the members of the household. 9.2. External Evaluation Process In addition to the internal monitoring process, external assessment of the resettlement process should be undertaken through an external evaluation agency appointed by 44 REA. The external evaluation process will be informed by internal monitoring reports prepared by REA, and also through independent surveys and consultation conducted by the evaluation agency. The evaluation system will be based on process and outcome indicators. 9.2.1. Process Indicators Process indicators measure effectiveness of processes (consultation, grievance) and inputs like people, equipment and materials and identify areas where improvements to existing processes are required. These may include the following:  Transparency of the implementation process.  Adequacy of staff and capacity of the implementation agencies.  Compliance of the resettlement process with Ugandan law and World Bank standards.  Effectiveness of the Grievance Process.  Adequacy and effectiveness of public involvement.  Effectiveness of the internal monitoring mechanism. 9.2.2. Outcome Indicators Outcome indicators will assess effectiveness of the resettlement and changes that have occurred to the communities’ standard of living. Key indicators are outlined in Table below. Table 3: Monitoring indicators during resettlement Category Indicator Fund  Number of PAPs paid disbursement  Amount of money disbursed  Number of PAPs not paid in prescribed time (respective quarter)  Reasons for not paying PAPs who are due for payment  Projected disbursements in the next quarter Restoration of  Number of PAPs who have benefited from related entrepreneurial training and assets  Number of businesses restored livelihoods  Reasons for not re-establishing businesses  Number of NGOs that have been linked to PAPs Public  Number of community level meetings involvement  Participation rates of local leaders and community in resettlement process disaggregated by gender Grievance  Number of grievances received management  Number of grievances resolved (at what level)  Number of complaints reported to other government oversight bodies and outcomes including how grievance was resolved  Number of grievances refereed to Uganda Courts of Law  Number of outstanding grievances and reasons for not resolving them Custody of legal  Land title deeds received documents  Land title returned to owners Resettlement of  Number of vulnerable PAPs resettled vulnerable PAPs  Kind of special assistance provided 45 9.2.3. Key activities and responsibilities REA will liaise with relevant ministries (MoLGD, MAAIF, MoFPED, Development partners) to undertake external evaluation of resettlement mid-term and at end of resettlement. These evaluations will focus on reviewing the process to-date and making necessary recommendations for modification to existing rehabilitation measures and other processes (e.g. grievance). This will allow modifications to the process and design packages that would help improve the effectiveness of REA in implementing the RAP. Considering that socio-economic baseline information is included in this report, a socio-economic survey at the external evaluation is necessary in order to assess the impact of the resettlement exercise. 9.3. RAP completion report During RAP implementation the consultant will submit to REA quarterly progress reports, after completion of resettlement, a final report will be submitted by REA prior to preparation of the project implementation report. The report shall indicate effectiveness of project implementation and disbursement of compensation payments, effectiveness of public consultations and socio-economic impacts of the road on roadside communities. This report will give overall assessment of the RAP process indicating activities undertaken, success of mitigation action ns and monitoring and well as useful lessons learnt. 9.4.Completion Audit A key aim of resettlement is to ensure compensation and other mitigation measures restore or enhance affected people’s quality of life and income levels. If affected PAPs quality of life can be demonstrated to have been restored, the resettlement and compensation process can be deemed “complete�. The purpose of Completion Audit will therefore be to establish whether REA implemented all activities needed to ensure compliance proposed resettlement commitments and applicable national and international policies. Specifically, the completion audit will be based on progress indicators and on outcome evaluation indicators and shall aim to assess whether compensation for all impacts of all affected people was undertaken; whether timely delivery of entitlements and compliance with Uganda’s and international resettlement requirements was undertaken; whether compensation frameworks were developed and implemented in a fair and transparent manner and adequate attention made to mitigating social impacts; and whether livelihoods have been restored. 46 ANNEXES 47 ANNEX 1: DETAILED LIST OF AFFECTED PERSONS 75KM AYER-KAMDINI AND BOBI-MINAKULU 33KV POWER LINE PROJECT VALUATION AND COMPENSATION ASSESSMENT REPORT Value of 15% Dist Total Assessed Item Name of Claimant crops/Trees Allowance Compensation ABOKE SUBCOUNTY CORNER MOWLEM REA/AKBM/001 Lango Organic 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/002 Alele 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/003 Ekora William 97,000 14,550 111,550 REA/AKBM/004 Lokori Tom 59,375 8,906 68,281 REA/AKBM/005 Christine Lukeri 13,000 1,950 14,950 REA/AKBM/006 Obong Peter 71,875 10,781 82,656 REA/AKBM/007 Obong Peter 4,500 675 5,175 REA/AKBM/008 Okecha Sam 21,250 3,188 24,438 REA/AKBM/009 Evlyne Okecha Sam 1,125 169 1,294 REA/AKBM/010 Olugu Joel 2,000 300 2,300 REA/AKBM/011 Ogola Ray 25,000 3,750 28,750 REA/AKBM/012 Judith Okello Patrick 108,000 16,200 124,200 REA/AKBM/013 Olwata Lawrence 7,000 1,050 8,050 TE-OKOLE REA/AKBM/014 Omara Caroline 164,000 24,600 188,600 REA/AKBM/015 Ogwal Sam 9,000 1,350 10,350 REA/AKBM/016 Sylfo Akello 7,000 1,050 8,050 REA/AKBM/017 Acen Stella 281,000 42,150 323,150 REA/AKBM/018 Awino Mary 6,000 900 6,900 48 REA/AKBM/019 Joseph Opio Odongo 60,500 9,075 69,575 REA/AKBM/020 Opio Jimmy 80,000 12,000 92,000 REA/AKBM/021 Ajok Hellen 235,000 35,250 270,250 REA/AKBM/022 Onapa Parick 91,000 13,650 104,650 REA/AKBM/023 Okello Lawrence 20,500 3,075 23,575 REA/AKBM/024 Ekwaro Ambrose 25,000 3,750 28,750 ACERO 'A' REA/AKBM/025 Omara Jasper 6,000 900 6,900 REA/AKBM/026 Omara Francis 4,000 600 4,600 REA/AKBM/027 Phobe Okello Dick 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/028 Francis Ogwang 1,000 150 1,150 REA/AKBM/029 Okello Fred 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/030 Ocen James 25,000 3,750 28,750 REA/AKBM/031 Okello T. and Topachu J. 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/032 Topachu James 12,500 1,875 14,375 REA/AKBM/033 Omara David 7,000 1,050 8,050 REA/AKBM/034 Ongom Tabu 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/035 Owaca J. and kello T. 25,000 3,750 28,750 ALYAT 'A' REA/AKBM/036 Ogwang Richard A. 25,000 3,750 28,750 REA/AKBM/037 Omara Francis 10,000 1,500 11,500 49 REA/AKBM/038 Opio William Nickson 39,000 5,850 44,850 REA/AKBM/039 Omara Jimmy Angulu 41,500 6,225 47,725 ALYAT 'B' REA/AKBM/040 Oyar Vicent 11,500 1,725 13,225 REA/AKBM/041 Agony Vento 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/042 Ocen Joseph 1,000 150 1,150 Late Akedo N. c/o Okello REA/AKBM/043 1,000 150 1,150 Martin REA/AKBM/044 Opio Selestino 94,000 14,100 108,100 REA/AKBM/045 Oming Charlse 3,000 450 3,450 REA/AKBM/046 Namm Isaac 41,000 6,150 47,150 REA/AKBM/047 Okullo Richard 95,000 14,250 109,250 REA/AKBM/048 Ogwang Nelson 90,500 13,575 104,075 REA/AKBM/049 Rose Engole 6,000 900 6,900 REA/AKBM/050 Otyang Denis 51,000 7,650 58,650 REA/AKBM/051 Omodi Yubentino 25,500 3,825 29,325 REA/AKBM/052 Ebong Patrick 85,000 12,750 97,750 REA/AKBM/053 Docus Omara 57,000 8,550 65,550 REA/AKBM/054 Ocato John 4,000 600 4,600 REA/AKBM/055 Okello Lawrence 2,000 300 2,300 REA/AKBM/056 Ocen Leonard 22,500 3,375 25,875 LORO SUBCOUNTY ACERO 'B' 50 REA/AKBM/057 Odong Alex 36,000 5,400 41,400 REA/AKBM/058 Opat Jimmy 55,000 8,250 63,250 REA/AKBM/059 Okullo Geofrey 47,000 7,050 54,050 REA/AKBM/060 Okello Kizito 21,000 3,150 24,150 REA/AKBM/061 Otur Robert 65,000 9,750 74,750 REA/AKBM/062 Ogwang Martin 95,000 14,250 109,250 REA/AKBM/063 Odung Geofrey 313,000 46,950 359,950 REA/AKBM/064 Iyit Francis 51,000 7,650 58,650 REA/AKBM/065 Oginya Odinga 60,000 9,000 69,000 ACERO 'A' REA/AKBM/066 Arit John 1,000 150 1,150 REA/AKBM/067 Ocen Tom 19,000 2,850 21,850 REA/AKBM/068 Ogwang Robert 4,000 600 4,600 REA/AKBM/069 Ayela Robert 14,000 2,100 16,100 REA/AKBM/070 Okello David 38,000 5,700 43,700 REA/AKBM/071 Akullu Milly 8,000 1,200 9,200 REA/AKBM/072 Ekol Moris 4,500 675 5,175 REA/AKBM/073 Tile Francis 4,500 675 5,175 REA/AKBM/074 Arit John 1,000 150 1,150 REA/AKBM/075 Obua Alfred 31,500 4,725 36,225 AJAYA 51 REA/AKBM/076 Otim George 7,000 1,050 8,050 REA/AKBM/077 Lenga Richard 43,500 6,525 50,025 REA/AKBM/078 Lenga Evaster 53,000 7,950 60,950 REA/AKBM/079 Next to Ocen and Okot 65,000 9,750 74,750 REA/AKBM/080 Okot Y.Y. 138,000 20,700 158,700 REA/AKBM/081 Ogwang Bosco 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/082 Ayo Denis 25,000 3,750 28,750 REA/AKBM/083 Opio Moses 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/084 Hellen Opio 60,000 9,000 69,000 REA/AKBM/085 Ogwang David 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/086 Ocen Patrick 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/087 Owuni Richard 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/088 Opio Albino 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/089 Florence Oyat 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/090 Ocen Cipriano 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/091 Obua Denis 25,000 3,750 28,750 REA/AKBM/092 Obote Lawrence 180,000 27,000 207,000 REA/AKBM/093 Odongo Charlse 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/094 Rose Okello 36,000 5,400 41,400 REA/AKBM/095 Gira John 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/096 Okeny Vicent 73,000 10,950 83,950 52 REA/AKBM/097 Ojok Benson 147,000 22,050 169,050 REA/AKBM/098 Okello Alice 105,500 15,825 121,325 REA/AKBM/099 Lucy Olet 111,000 16,650 127,650 AGUGA 'A' REA/AKBM/100 Owiny Tito 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/101 Omara Kosia 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/102 Munu Denis Kalulu 1,000 150 1,150 REA/AKBM/103 Odyek Jonan 7,000 1,050 8,050 REA/AKBM/104 Okullo James 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/105 Ananga James 3,000 450 3,450 REA/AKBM/106 Omara Denis 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/107 Y.B Okello 25,000 3,750 28,750 REA/AKBM/108 Ekii Newton 29,000 4,350 33,350 REA/AKBM/109 Ongom Engenio 4,000 600 4,600 REA/AKBM/110 Okoya Jasper 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/111 Obong George 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/112 Okullo David 85,000 12,750 97,750 REA/AKBM/113 Ocen George 55,000 8,250 63,250 REA/AKBM/114 Okuku Anthony 14,000 2,100 16,100 REA/AKBM/115 Etenyu Emmanuel 10,000 1,500 11,500 ALIDI 'A' 53 REA/AKBM/116 Alidi Primary School 1,176,000 176,400 1,352,400 REA/AKBM/117 Odongo Bonny 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/118 Omara Bosco 10,000 1,500 11,500 ONGOR REA/AKBM/119 Okot Peter 44,000 6,600 50,600 REA/AKBM/120 Ojok William 342,565 51,385 393,950 REA/AKBM/121 Amuku Ambrose 61,550 9,233 70,783 REA/AKBM/122 Geofrey Ojok Newton 13,000 1,950 14,950 REA/AKBM/123 Oyar Martin 150,460 22,569 173,029 REA/AKBM/124 Rezabwani Otyang 135,700 20,355 156,055 REA/AKBM/125 Bongo Daniel 253,000 37,950 290,950 REA/AKBM/126 Grace Odyek 123,500 18,525 142,025 REA/AKBM/127 Okoo Alfred 21,000 3,150 24,150 REA/AKBM/128 Amuku Patrick 15,500 2,325 17,825 REA/AKBM/129 Omara Patrick 43,500 6,525 50,025 REA/AKBM/130 Elen Benson 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/131 Obong John 106,000 15,900 121,900 REA/AKBM/132 Abur Sylvia Otyang 106,000 15,900 121,900 REA/AKBM/133 Ojede Benson 46,000 6,900 52,900 REA/AKBM/134 Omara Jimmy 48,000 7,200 55,200 REA/AKBM/135 Olila Charlse 5,000 750 5,750 54 REA/AKBM/136 Opio Nickson 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/137 Okello Alfred 66,000 9,900 75,900 REA/AKBM/138 Ojede Milton 12,000 1,800 13,800 REA/AKBM/139 Okello Vicent 2,000 300 2,300 REA/AKBM/140 Odongo Jonan 60,000 9,000 69,000 REA/AKBM/141 Okullo David 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/142 Awany Paspiko 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/143 Owiny John Alfonse 62,000 9,300 71,300 REA/AKBM/144 Okello Vicent 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/145 Okello Wilfred 32,000 4,800 36,800 REA/AKBM/146 Doi (Prison Officer) 2,000 300 2,300 REA/AKBM/147 Opio (Builder) 1,000 150 1,150 REA/AKBM/148 Luzino Opiny 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/149 Odong Quintino 41,000 6,150 47,150 REA/AKBM/150 Ogwal 2,000 300 2,300 Odyek Tony C/o Okori REA/AKBM/151 8,000 1,200 9,200 Sam ATYETO 'A' REA/AKBM/152 Omara Emmy 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/153 Otyang George 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/154 Ongol Moses 16,000 2,400 18,400 55 REA/AKBM/155 Opio Tony 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/156 Ongol Moses 150,000 22,500 172,500 REA/AKBM/157 Okello Peter Odyek 70,500 10,575 81,075 REA/AKBM/158 Geofrey Okello Opio 90,000 13,500 103,500 KOMCANIKWERI REA/AKBM/159 Omor Charlse 3,019,000 452,850 3,471,850 REA/AKBM/160 Oboo Emmanuel 15,000 2,250 17,250 REA/AKBM/161 Aida Okedi 8,000 1,200 9,200 REA/AKBM/162 Omor Charlse 978,000 146,700 1,124,700 REA/AKBM/163 Okeng Moses 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/164 Oleke Dickens 51,000 7,650 58,650 REA/AKBM/165 Omara Augustine 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/166 Bua Bosco 1,000 150 1,150 PIP REA/AKBM/167 Odongo Denis 25,000 3,750 28,750 REA/AKBM/168 Iyanyi Primary School 141,000 21,150 162,150 REA/AKBM/169 Rev. Omara Francis 52,000 7,800 59,800 IYANYI 'A' REA/AKBM/170 Opio Denis 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/171 Okello Moris 2,000 300 2,300 REA/AKBM/172 Abule Francis 20,000 3,000 23,000 56 REA/AKBM/173 Ogwal James 25,000 3,750 28,750 REA/AKBM/174 Ogwal J.B. 70,000 10,500 80,500 IYANYI 'B' REA/AKBM/175 Odongo Bosco 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/176 Okello Peter 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/177 Olila Francis 17,000 2,550 19,550 REA/AKBM/178 Ameny Richard 12,000 1,800 13,800 REA/AKBM/179 Olobo George 32,000 4,800 36,800 REA/AKBM/180 Anam Silvesto 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/181 Obua Denis 197,000 29,550 226,550 REA/AKBM/182 Okello Denis 100,000 15,000 115,000 OBANGA OMII REA/AKBM/183 Ngole William 4,000 600 4,600 REA/AKBM/184 Ogal Jonan 22,000 3,300 25,300 REA/AKBM/185 Ongom Beatrice 58,538 8,781 67,319 REA/AKBM/186 Omara Nickson 54,563 8,184 62,747 REA/AKBM/187 Okello Nelson 78,000 11,700 89,700 REA/AKBM/188 Odyek Geofrey 3,000 450 3,450 REA/AKBM/189 Ocen Nickodemus 64,750 9,713 74,463 REA/AKBM/190 Ongom Peter Jenty 323,000 48,450 371,450 ADYEDA 57 REA/AKBM/191 Corina Odyek 156,000 23,400 179,400 REA/AKBM/192 Ogwang Nelson 88,680 13,302 101,982 REA/AKBM/193 Ogwal Christopher 11,000 1,650 12,650 REA/AKBM/194 Odongo Alex 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/195 Ogwal Emmanuel 4,000 600 4,600 REA/AKBM/196 Okello Charlse 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/197 Okello Alfred 42,000 6,300 48,300 ANYALO REA/AKBM/198 Olugu James 60,000 9,000 69,000 REA/AKBM/199 Onapa Omara 7,000 1,050 8,050 REA/AKBM/200 Ongom Stephen 76,000 11,400 87,400 REA/AKBM/201 Otim Matiya 31,000 4,650 35,650 REA/AKBM/202 Agen John 90,000 13,500 103,500 REA/AKBM/203 Akaki Simon 7,000 1,050 8,050 REA/AKBM/204 Ogwang Moses 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/205 Next to Ogwang Moses 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/206 Obong William 60,000 9,000 69,000 REA/AKBM/207 Moro Jasper 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/208 Lama George 87,000 13,050 100,050 REA/AKBM/209 Okello John 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/210 Odongo Dick 25,000 3,750 28,750 58 REA/AKBM/211 Igach Godfrey 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/212 Omara Godfrey 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/213 Olugu James 124,400 18,660 143,060 REA/AKBM/214 Alip Joseph 70,000 10,500 80,500 ODONG OYERE REA/AKBM/215 Farmer Field School 76,800 11,520 88,320 REA/AKBM/216 Olobo Geofrey 210,500 31,575 242,075 REA/AKBM/217 Erike Willy 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/218 Adenge Alterio 185,000 27,750 212,750 REA/AKBM/219 Odyeny Richard 7,500 1,125 8,625 REA/AKBM/220 Lucy Okello 92,500 13,875 106,375 AKAIDEBE 'B' REA/AKBM/221 Ouma Richard 70,000 10,500 80,500 REA/AKBM/222 Ekwaro Robert 120,000 18,000 138,000 REA/AKBM/223 Obua Peter 7,000 1,050 8,050 REA/AKBM/224 Okullo Alfred 14,000 2,100 16,100 REA/AKBM/225 Okwir Oscar 60,000 9,000 69,000 REA/AKBM/226 Apeuyo Tom 25,000 3,750 28,750 REA/AKBM/227 Okori Patrick 82,000 12,300 94,300 REA/AKBM/228 Okot James Wacha 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/229 Tyan Peter 8,000 1,200 9,200 59 REA/AKBM/230 Owiny Anthony 9,000 1,350 10,350 REA/AKBM/231 Obote Benson 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/232 Dunyiro Jasper 23,000 3,450 26,450 REA/AKBM/233 Ayoo Martin 31,500 4,725 36,225 REA/AKBM/234 Santa Okwir 60,000 9,000 69,000 REA/AKBM/235 Odongo Charlse 100,000 15,000 115,000 REA/AKBM/236 Odai David 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/237 Obonyo T.G 150,000 22,500 172,500 REA/AKBM/238 Rose Obuga 60,000 9,000 69,000 REA/AKBM/239 Ongiro George 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/240 Ouma Richard 65,000 9,750 74,750 REA/AKBM/241 Olobo Edward 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/242 Ebabu Joe 10,500 1,575 12,075 REA/AKBM/243 Angulu Bonny 2,500 375 2,875 REA/AKBM/244 Ogwok 46,000 6,900 52,900 REA/AKBM/245 Eagle Wings Academy 65,200 9,780 74,980 REA/AKBM/246 Omach James 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/247 Ogwal Patrick 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/248 Otak Charlse 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/249 Otim James 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/250 Okello Tablique 15,000 2,250 17,250 60 Loro Sub County Head REA/AKBM/251 174,800 26,220 201,020 Quarters REA/AKBM/252 Loro Health Centre II 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/253 Loro S.S.S 177,000 26,550 203,550 AKAOIDEBE 'A' St. Peters Church of REA/AKBM/254 50,000 7,500 57,500 Uganda REA/AKBM/255 Loro Primary School 1,152,000 172,800 1,324,800 Loro Core Primary REA/AKBM/256 596,000 89,400 685,400 Teachers College ALICA REA/AKBM/257 Ajwang Milly 25,500 3,825 29,325 REA/AKBM/258 Okullo Benson 35,000 5,250 40,250 REA/AKBM/259 Ongar Charlse 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/260 Aboko John 75,000 11,250 86,250 REA/AKBM/261 Okello Washington 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/262 Ojok Alfred 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/263 Otim Alele 12,000 1,800 13,800 REA/AKBM/264 Olwata okullo Richard 883,750 132,563 1,016,313 REA/AKBM/265 Ongwen Rashid 194,000 29,100 223,100 REA/AKBM/266 Scovia Tuma 67,000 10,050 77,050 REA/AKBM/267 Ogwal Inasimu 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/268 Lucy Atoma 27,600 4,140 31,740 REA/AKBM/269 Wacha Alfred 14,000 2,100 16,100 61 REA/AKBM/270 Apio Molly 14,000 2,100 16,100 REA/AKBM/271 Ana Akullo 396,900 59,535 456,435 REA/AKBM/272 Pastor Ongiru 209,000 31,350 240,350 REA/AKBM/273 Okech Esakali 20,000 3,000 23,000 ACAN KOMA Loro Model Primary REA/AKBM/274 44,000 6,600 50,600 School REA/AKBM/275 Odwe James 64,000 9,600 73,600 REA/AKBM/276 Agnes Ogwal 123,500 18,525 142,025 REA/AKBM/277 Apio Alice 204,025 30,604 234,629 REA/AKBM/278 Olak Dickson 45,000 6,750 51,750 REA/AKBM/279 Obong Sam 955,000 143,250 1,098,250 REA/AKBM/280 Opio Richard 24,500 3,675 28,175 REA/AKBM/281 Owacha Geofrey 170,000 25,500 195,500 REA/AKBM/282 Farmer Field School 118,800 17,820 136,620 REA/AKBM/283 Benson Opio 97,000 14,550 111,550 REA/AKBM/284 Ocen Alfred 58,000 8,700 66,700 BARMWONY REA/AKBM/285 Ogwal Simon 87,000 13,050 100,050 REA/AKBM/286 Ebong John 80,000 12,000 92,000 REA/AKBM/287 Obong George 70,000 10,500 80,500 REA/AKBM/288 Opio Bosco 50,000 7,500 57,500 62 Community Land REA/AKBM/289 20,000 3,000 23,000 Barmwony REA/AKBM/290 Obura Sam 158,000 23,700 181,700 REA/AKBM/291 Okwir Charlse 62,500 9,375 71,875 REA/AKBM/292 Ogwal Richard Odur 8,000 1,200 9,200 REA/AKBM/293 Apollo Enesta 27,500 4,125 31,625 REA/AKBM/294 Odora Jimmy 148,000 22,200 170,200 REA/AKBM/295 Acai Francis 116,000 17,400 133,400 REA/AKBM/296 Calvin Erem 71,000 10,650 81,650 REA/AKBM/297 Otim Patrick 658,500 98,775 757,275 REA/AKBM/298 Alobo Dickens 226,000 33,900 259,900 BARLYE C REA/AKBM/299 Ayo Jasper 318,000 47,700 365,700 REA/AKBM/300 Olweny Geofrey 920,250 138,038 1,058,288 REA/AKBM/301 Ducu Gabriel 52,500 7,875 60,375 REA/AKBM/302 Ducu Emmanuel 198,750 29,813 228,563 REA/AKBM/303 Oyite Ambrose 26,250 3,938 30,188 REA/AKBM/304 Okwiji Michael 4,000 600 4,600 REA/AKBM/305 Emaro Sam 253,750 38,063 291,813 REA/AKBM/306 Ongom Israel 167,000 25,050 192,050 REA/AKBM/307 Esau Omara 345,000 51,750 396,750 REA/AKBM/308 Ongenga Jacob 433,000 64,950 497,950 63 REA/AKBM/309 Levi Niye 1,990,000 298,500 2,288,500 REA/AKBM/310 Ogwal Peter 25,000 3,750 28,750 REA/AKBM/311 Opara John 723,625 108,544 832,169 REA/AKBM/312 Okullo Peter Arach 698,500 104,775 803,275 REA/AKBM/313 Milly Okii 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/314 Okullo Peter Arach 47,500 7,125 54,625 ASABA SUBCOUNTY OTWE REA/AKBM/315 Ongwech David 227,000 34,050 261,050 REA/AKBM/316 Kiiza Washington 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/317 Okene Alex 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/318 Ojok Robert 12,000 1,800 13,800 REA/AKBM/319 Aporo George 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/320 Erume John 107,000 16,050 123,050 REA/AKBM/321 Apwony Ongom Denis 15,000 2,250 17,250 REA/AKBM/322 Okwe Richard 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/323 Omara Joe 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/324 Amony Nelson 70,250 10,538 80,788 REA/AKBM/325 Oyengo David 26,500 3,975 30,475 REA/AKBM/326 Etuk John 71,000 10,650 81,650 REA/AKBM/327 Arach Lawrence 50,000 7,500 57,500 64 REA/AKBM/328 Ojuko Quinto 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/329 Oyengo David 100,000 15,000 115,000 REA/AKBM/330 Apul Isaac 150,000 22,500 172,500 REA/AKBM/331 Abeja Charlse 195,000 29,250 224,250 LORO SUBCOUNTY ABONGO OKERE REA/AKBM/332 Ogwang Leo 175,000 26,250 201,250 REA/AKBM/333 Molly Atim 50,370 7,556 57,926 REA/AKBM/334 Elen Tony 28,000 4,200 32,200 REA/AKBM/335 Odong Felix 247,375 37,106 284,481 REA/AKBM/336 Ongom Patrick 574,000 86,100 660,100 REA/AKBM/337 Odongo David 191,625 28,744 220,369 REA/AKBM/338 Otim Bob 106,456 15,968 122,424 REA/AKBM/339 Okullo Franco 94,500 14,175 108,675 ABOLONENO REA/AKBM/340 Okori Nelson 94,000 14,100 108100 REA/AKBM/341 Next to Okori Nelson 30,000 4,500 34500 REA/AKBM/342 Ekii Michael 9,000 1,350 10350 REA/AKBM/343 Ekwaro Peter 20,000 3,000 23000 REA/AKBM/344 Odila Richard 24,000 3,600 27600 REA/AKBM/345 Acak Joel 10,000 1,500 11500 65 REA/AKBM/346 Omara Nelson 77,500 11,625 89125 REA/AKBM/347 Omara Thomas 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/348 Next to Omara Thomas 25,000 3,750 28,750 REA/AKBM/349 Ayo Francis 43,000 6,450 49,450 REA/AKBM/350 Opio Alex 11,000 1,650 12,650 REA/AKBM/351 Opio Edward 7,000 1,050 8,050 REA/AKBM/352 Ayo Yoventino 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/353 Adong Lucy 8,000 1,200 9,200 REA/AKBM/354 Ana Okao 27,500 4,125 31,625 REA/AKBM/355 Opio Lawrence 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/356 Next to Opio Lawrence 6,000 900 6,900 REA/AKBM/357 Simao Engole 9,000 1,350 10,350 REA/AKBM/358 Ayo Yoventino 76,000 11,400 87,400 REA/AKBM/359 Obura Geofrey 1,000 150 1,150 REA/AKBM/360 Next to Obura Geofrey 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/361 Okullo (1) 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/362 Ogwang Nelson 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/363 Okullo (2) 156,000 23,400 179,400 REA/AKBM/364 Oloro Solomon 45,000 6,750 51,750 REA/AKBM/365 Ajwang Milly 12,000 1,800 13,800 REA/AKBM/366 Ojede Moses 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/367 Okot Christopher 32,000 4,800 36,800 66 REA/AKBM/368 Opio Solomon 13,000 1,950 14,950 REA/AKBM/369 Ocen William 6,000 900 6,900 REA/AKBM/370 Ongom Sam 36,000 5,400 41,400 REA/AKBM/371 Okello Edward 25,000 3,750 28,750 REA/AKBM/372 Owani Charlse 134,000 20,100 154,100 REA/AKBM/373 Ogwang Nelson 60,000 9,000 69,000 REA/AKBM/374 Grace Wani 22,000 3,300 25,300 REA/AKBM/375 Atim Stella 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/376 Engole George 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/377 Stella Atim 9,000 1,350 10,350 REA/AKBM/378 Wani Simon Peter 17,000 2,550 19,550 REA/AKBM/379 Obua Sam 11,000 1,650 12,650 REA/AKBM/380 Owani Patrick 65,000 9,750 74,750 REA/AKBM/381 Orinaya Atim 53,000 7,950 60,950 REA/AKBM/382 Ekii Walter 35,000 5,250 40,250 AWE IKWO REA/AKBM/383 Charlse Opio Ojuka 41,500 6,225 47,725 REA/AKBM/384 Amonya Patrick 516,000 77,400 593,400 REA/AKBM/385 Okullo Vicent 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/386 Owiny Aloysious 18,000 2,700 20,700 REA/AKBM/387 Sarah Ogwang 5,000 750 5,750 67 REA/AKBM/388 Atim Buruno 110,000 16,500 126,500 REA/AKBM/389 Opido Jimmy 149,000 22,350 171,350 REA/AKBM/390 Oming Tom 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/391 Opiny Jimmy 90,000 13,500 103,500 REA/AKBM/392 Alur Charlse 3,000 450 3,450 REA/AKBM/393 Adyang Kenneth 90,000 13,500 103,500 REA/AKBM/394 Amonya Patrick 15,000 2,250 17,250 REA/AKBM/395 Otim Patrick Olwa 45,000 6,750 51,750 REA/AKBM/396 Ocen Jimmy 1,000 150 1,150 REA/AKBM/397 Ocrach Nicholas 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/398 Olipa James 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/399 Oder Thomas 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/400 Ogwal Lawrence 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/401 Amonya Patrick 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/402 Oyota Alfred 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/403 Achili John 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/404 Owani Pilate 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/405 Tia Albino 17,000 2,550 19,550 REA/AKBM/406 Onyany Alfred 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/407 Omara Sam 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/408 Semi Olot 41,000 6,150 47,150 68 REA/AKBM/409 Otak Patrick 60,000 9,000 69,000 REA/AKBM/410 Ecum Patrick 31,000 4,650 35,650 REA/AKBM/411 Ojok Ceaser 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/412 Okello Kosia 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/413 Odeng Bosco 1,000 150 1,150 REA/AKBM/414 Odyek Lawrence 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/415 Acanga Edonge Agoro 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/416 Etonga Silvesto 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/417 Okecha Patrick 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/418 Ocan Michael 7,000 1,050 8,050 ABER SUBCOUNTY DAM AMALO REA/AKBM/419 Agenowong Sam 32,000 4,800 36,800 REA/AKBM/420 Agong Peter 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/421 Onedi Bosco 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/422 Arya Polly 75,000 11,250 86,250 REA/AKBM/423 Odyek Willy 38,725 5,809 44,534 REA/AKBM/424 Okullo Sam 115,000 17,250 132,250 REA/AKBM/425 Odongo Richard 27,000 4,050 31,050 REA/AKBM/426 Otyal Francis 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/427 Awuchu Daniel 2,000 300 2,300 69 REA/AKBM/428 Alyata Lawrence 21,000 3,150 24,150 REA/AKBM/429 Ayo Patrick 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/430 Odongo Santo 85,000 12,750 97,750 REA/AKBM/431 Ongom David 106,000 15,900 121,900 REA/AKBM/432 Odongo Simon 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/433 Amoko Joseph 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/434 Ocen Moses 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/435 Otuke Benard 35,000 5,250 40,250 REA/AKBM/436 Olunyi William 80,000 12,000 92,000 REA/AKBM/437 Obwor Emmanual 326,500 48,975 375,475 REA/AKBM/438 Olwa 60,000 9,000 69,000 DAM APINY REA/AKBM/439 Okwanga Quirino 95,000 14,250 109,250 REA/AKBM/440 Otim Kenneth 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/441 Okech Godfrey 170,000 25,500 195,500 REA/AKBM/442 Okacha Geofrey 19,000 2,850 21,850 REA/AKBM/443 Ogwal David 24,000 3,600 27,600 REA/AKBM/444 Owiny Okwonga 18,000 2,700 20,700 REA/AKBM/445 Ogwang Robert 12,000 1,800 13,800 REA/AKBM/446 Acipa Pasca 90,000 13,500 103,500 REA/AKBM/447 Amuja Denis 7,000 1,050 8,050 70 REA/AKBM/448 Ogwang Robert 424,000 63,600 487,600 LWALA REA/AKBM/449 Oryem Vicent 60,000 9,000 69,000 REA/AKBM/450 Okello Bonny 25,000 3,750 28,750 REA/AKBM/451 Opio Robert 50,500 7,575 58,075 REA/AKBM/452 Onyang Kassim 138,000 20,700 158,700 REA/AKBM/453 Adupa Robert 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/454 Oyite Jasper 13,000 1,950 14,950 REA/AKBM/455 Oceng George 100,000 15,000 115,000 Fr. Oryang Mem. Primary REA/AKBM/456 310,000 46,500 356,500 School ALOBO LAC REA/AKBM/457 Okwany Alfred 15,000 2,250 17,250 REA/AKBM/458 Obira Bosco 4,000 600 4,600 REA/AKBM/459 Akao Roseline 2,000 300 2,300 REA/AKBM/460 Odyek Mike 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/461 Florence Adong 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/462 Angwen Kerobina 58,000 8,700 66,700 REA/AKBM/463 Ogwal Denis 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/464 Okeny Geofrey 18,000 2,700 20,700 REA/AKBM/465 Adeli Seraphino 18,000 2,700 20,700 REA/AKBM/466 Ebila Robert 20,000 3,000 23,000 71 REA/AKBM/467 Odongo Mark 70,000 10,500 80,500 REA/AKBM/468 Onap Richard 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/469 Ogwal Anthony 1,000 150 1,150 REA/AKBM/470 Alunya Odongo 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/471 Okwanga Robert 15,000 2,250 17,250 BARCAL REA/AKBM/472 Amuko Tom 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/473 Okello Paskali 15,000 2,250 17,250 REA/AKBM/474 Nyangkoni Julius 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/475 Agonyo Robert 7,000 1,050 8,050 REA/AKBM/476 Ojok David 115,000 17,250 132,250 REA/AKBM/477 Pastor Ayee Benson 7,000 1,050 8,050 REA/AKBM/478 Okello Nelson 60,000 9,000 69,000 REA/AKBM/479 Okii David 15,000 2,250 17,250 REA/AKBM/480 Obyelo Tommy 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/481 Santa Eyit 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/482 Obyelo Patrick 15,000 2,250 17,250 REA/AKBM/483 Omara Vicent 101,000 15,150 116,150 REA/AKBM/484 Ebil Tom 39,375 5,906 45,281 REA/AKBM/485 Okello Bosco 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/486 Ebil George 15,000 2,250 17,250 72 REA/AKBM/487 Owiny Robert 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/488 Odyek Peter 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/489 Obyelo Hudson 48,877 7,332 56,209 REA/AKBM/490 Odyek Richard 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/491 Ongora Charlse 203,000 30,450 233,450 REA/AKBM/492 Odyek Peter 264,000 39,600 303,600 KAMDINI SUBCOUNTY ADAK 'B' REA/AKBM/493 Odyek Peter 54,000 8,100 62,100 REA/AKBM/494 Opio Richard 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/495 Okore Norbert 9,000 1,350 10,350 REA/AKBM/496 Ocen Martin 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/497 Opio Cipriano 25,000 3,750 28,750 REA/AKBM/498 Ogwang Cipriano 82,000 12,300 94,300 REA/AKBM/499 Oduke Ambrose 12,500 1,875 14,375 REA/AKBM/500 Odongo Tony 45,000 6,750 51,750 REA/AKBM/501 Okodi Jasper 91,000 13,650 104,650 REA/AKBM/502 Ngole Alfred 120,000 18,000 138,000 REA/AKBM/503 Okullo Walter 32,000 4,800 36,800 REA/AKBM/504 Okodi Jasper 5,000 750 5,750 ADAK 'A' 73 REA/AKBM/505 Teke George 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/506 Ocen Nelson 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/507 Odyek Albino 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/508 Adak Church of Uganda 15,000 2,250 17,250 REA/AKBM/509 Okot Dick 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/510 Olum Tobby 79,500 11,925 91,425 REA/AKBM/511 Okol Michael 9,250 1,388 10,638 REA/AKBM/512 Otoo Terrence 542,500 81,375 623,875 REA/AKBM/513 Okello Fred 93,500 14,025 107,525 REA/AKBM/514 Olum Yokusafati 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/515 Odongo Vicent 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/516 Okala Alex 75,000 11,250 86,250 REA/AKBM/517 Ayo Charlse 35,000 5,250 40,250 REA/AKBM/518 Alonga Joel 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/519 Okodi David 25,000 3,750 28,750 REA/AKBM/520 Okali Alex 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/521 Oukalle Dok 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/522 Acin David 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/523 Ogwang Akodo 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/524 Otia Geofrey 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/525 Opio Bruno 55,000 8,250 63,250 74 REA/AKBM/526 Ogwal Francis 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/527 Adupa George 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/528 Ongora Ray 45,000 6,750 51,750 REA/AKBM/529 Olot George 15,500 2,325 17,825 REA/AKBM/530 Owiny George 236,000 35,400 271,400 REA/AKBM/531 Opio Odyek 38,000 5,700 43,700 REA/AKBM/532 Okudu Samuel 7,000 1,050 8,050 REA/AKBM/533 Nurse 34,000 5,100 39,100 REA/AKBM/534 Ongu Ego Tom 20,500 3,075 23,575 REA/AKBM/535 Okello Simon 25,000 3,750 28,750 REA/AKBM/536 Ekii Lawrence 158,000 23,700 181,700 REA/AKBM/537 Ongada George 75,000 11,250 86,250 ABER SUBCOUNTY ALYEC REA/AKBM/538 Ayo Tom Richard 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/539 Selima Olwa Shaban 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/540 Okullo Ojok 1,775,000 266,250 2,041,250 REA/AKBM/541 Otogo Pius 6,000 900 6,900 REA/AKBM/542 Ayo Tony 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/543 Ogwang Patrick 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/544 Ayini Jimmy 40,000 6,000 46,000 75 REA/AKBM/545 Odongo Felix 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/546 Odongo Dick 12,000 1,800 13,800 REA/AKBM/547 Ogwang Patrick 24,000 3,600 27,600 TWOCAN IKWERI REA/AKBM/548 Otyang Jimmy 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/549 Ester Ajik 26,000 3,900 29,900 REA/AKBM/550 Ocen Egach 71,000 10,650 81,650 REA/AKBM/551 Anana Terensio 20,000 3,000 23,000 CEKWERE REA/AKBM/552 Odongo Luis 143,000 21,450 164,450 REA/AKBM/553 Otim Ronald 500 75 575 REA/AKBM/554 Ogwal Felix 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/555 Opio Francis 27,000 4,050 31,050 REA/AKBM/556 Otwal Egwel 6,000 900 6,900 REA/AKBM/557 Patricia Amyuru 45,000 6,750 51,750 REA/AKBM/558 Atim Raymond 100,000 15,000 115,000 CORNER ATAPARA REA/AKBM/559 Egwel Richard 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/560 Acire Tomoi 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/561 Angulu Ceaser 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/562 Akello Enester 22,000 3,300 25,300 76 REA/AKBM/563 Olobo Robert 75,825 11,374 87,199 REA/AKBM/564 Oryang Dan 411,175 61,676 472,851 REA/AKBM/565 Ojok Stephen 108,013 16,202 124,215 REA/AKBM/566 Alele William 70,625 10,594 81,219 REA/AKBM/567 Lucy Opito 71,000 10,650 81,650 REA/AKBM/568 Obadia Oryang Estate 392,000 58,800 450,800 REA/AKBM/569 Tommy Opito 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/570 Opito Denis 37,500 5,625 43,125 REA/AKBM/571 Kia Florence 245,000 36,750 281,750 REA/AKBM/572 Benard Opito 75,000 11,250 86,250 KAMDINI SUBCOUNTY ABULI REA/AKBM/573 Obadia Oryang Estate 139,000 20,850 159,850 REA/AKBM/574 Ojoka Jackson 42,325 6,349 48,674 REA/AKBM/575 Okello Santo 47,000 7,050 54,050 REA/AKBM/576 Okii Ricky 60,000 9,000 69,000 REA/AKBM/577 Owing Amos 25,000 3,750 28,750 REA/AKBM/578 Atoo James 34,500 5,175 39,675 REA/AKBM/579 Dr. Oryem Vicent 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/580 Oday Francis 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/581 Otim Jacinta 23,000 3,450 26,450 ABER SUBCOUNTY 77 AWELO MAKWERI REA/AKBM/582 Selestino Okite 45,000 6,750 51,750 REA/AKBM/583 Abonyu Margret 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/584 Epila Robert 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/585 Otango 65,000 9,750 74,750 REA/AKBM/586 Omara Francis 2,000 300 2,300 REA/AKBM/587 Opio Charlse 2,000 300 2,300 REA/AKBM/588 Owiny Jimmy 256,400 38,460 294,860 REA/AKBM/589 Odung Denis 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/590 Onyera William 43,000 6,450 49,450 REA/AKBM/591 Otwal Wilson 14,000 2,100 16,100 REA/AKBM/592 Opio Christopher 8,000 1,200 9,200 REA/AKBM/593 Jabulon Ogwang 69,625 10,444 80,069 REA/AKBM/594 Ogwang Leko 116,000 17,400 133,400 REA/AKBM/595 Benet Odong 7,000 1,050 8,050 REA/AKBM/596 Ogwal Leko 46,000 6,900 52,900 Jedikea Mono C/O Ayiny REA/AKBM/597 21,000 3,150 24,150 Jimmy REA/AKBM/598 Okello Oloro 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/599 Orech Kenneth 16,000 2,400 18,400 REA/AKBM/600 Opio Christopher 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/601 Okite Nelson 33,000 4,950 37,950 78 REA/AKBM/602 Otim Sam 23,000 3,450 26,450 REA/AKBM/603 Okwanga Washington 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/604 Alinga Constance 60,000 9,000 69,000 REA/AKBM/605 Olugu Terensio 18,500 2,775 21,275 REA/AKBM/606 Ojok William 590,000 88,500 678,500 REA/AKBM/607 Okwanga Jolly Ojok 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/608 Otim Robert 325,000 48,750 373,750 REA/AKBM/609 Okodi Jimmy 24,000 3,600 27,600 OKETO BITO REA/AKBM/610 Olugu Mudu Kayo 205,000 30,750 235,750 REA/AKBM/611 Ayo Julius Peter 213,000 31,950 244,950 REA/AKBM/612 Dollotiya Otim 374,000 56,100 430,100 REA/AKBM/613 Dollotiya Munu Ocol 1,980,000 297,000 2,277,000 AWARIPINY REA/AKBM/614 Aber Primary School 158,500 23,775 182,275 REA/AKBM/615 Oluma David 10,088 1,513 11,601 REA/AKBM/616 Atik Cherulaka 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/617 Okello Robin 11,000 1,650 12,650 REA/AKBM/618 Opito Washington 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/619 Acut Nelson 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/620 Olwit Benard 15,000 2,250 17,250 79 REA/AKBM/621 Odongo Francis 111,000 16,650 127,650 REA/AKBM/622 Okello Nelson 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/623 Otim Vicent 2,700 405 3,105 REA/AKBM/624 Ogwal Denis 50,000 7,500 57,500 OKARAWOK REA/AKBM/625 Abang Lucy 437,500 65,625 503,125 REA/AKBM/626 Simpo Odyek 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/627 Olugu Oribo 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/628 Anyuru Anthony 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/629 Maritina Kasajja 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/630 Florence Akech 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/631 Omara John 120,000 18,000 138,000 REA/AKBM/632 Opio Moses 11,000 1,650 12,650 REA/AKBM/633 Odongo Thomson 60,000 9,000 69,000 REA/AKBM/634 Mitolesi Okwanga 45,000 6,750 51,750 REA/AKBM/635 Nawome Obete 75,000 11,250 86,250 REA/AKBM/636 Okodi Adupa 75,000 11,250 86,250 REA/AKBM/637 Alice Engede 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/638 Akello Betty 22,000 3,300 25,300 REA/AKBM/639 Atyang Charlse 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/640 Onyala Abdu 23,000 3,450 26,450 80 REA/AKBM/641 Akello Milly 25,000 3,750 28,750 AROK REA/AKBM/642 Okello Richard 4,000 600 4,600 REA/AKBM/643 Aguma Tony 7,000 1,050 8,050 REA/AKBM/644 Opio Christopher 21,500 3,225 24,725 REA/AKBM/645 Ojok William 23,500 3,525 27,025 REA/AKBM/646 Okenyi Christopher 66,750 10,013 76,763 REA/AKBM/647 Olugu Jefenia 13,500 2,025 15,525 KAMDINI SUBCOUNTY DOG ABAM REA/AKBM/648 Rada Grace 118,000 17,700 135,700 REA/AKBM/649 Ajok Marther 93,000 13,950 106,950 AMUKUGUNGU REA/AKBM/650 Ojuka Mark 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/651 Odongo Moses 24,000 3,600 27,600 REA/AKBM/652 Akello Rose 37,875 5,681 43,556 REA/AKBM/653 Elwa Amos 30,625 4,594 35,219 REA/AKBM/654 Alunyu Saidi 123,000 18,450 141,450 KAMDINI TOWN BOARD REA/AKBM/655 Okello Olong 3,000 450 3,450 REA/AKBM/656 Odongo (Mechanic) 17,500 2,625 20,125 81 REA/AKBM/657 Okello Yewe 471,500 70,725 542,225 REA/AKBM/658 Ogwal Small 193,000 28,950 221,950 REA/AKBM/659 Joyce Ogwal 144,500 21,675 166,175 REA/AKBM/660 Ogwang Sam 3,000 450 3,450 REA/AKBM/661 Mama Anjelina 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/662 Nengo Emmanuel 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/663 Omony Nelson 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/664 Ogwang Sam's Sister 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/665 Owelo Lawrence 16,500 2,475 18,975 REA/AKBM/666 Adimu Simon 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/667 Sofia 2,000 300 2,300 Bank Manager (Next to REA/AKBM/668 20,000 3,000 23,000 Atik Serulaka) REA/AKBM/669 Onzi Saidi 23,000 3,450 26,450 St. Peter and Paul Catholic REA/AKBM/670 27,000 4,050 31,050 Church REA/AKBM/671 Agwa Jenesio 9,000 1,350 10,350 REA/AKBM/672 Ecat Moses 63,000 9,450 72,450 REA/AKBM/673 Joyce Obonyo 97,500 14,625 112,125 ABANYA 'B' REA/AKBM/674 Alunyu Fred 76,000 11,400 87,400 REA/AKBM/675 Rose Alunyu 232,500 34,875 267,375 REA/AKBM/676 Welo 6,500 975 7,475 82 REA/AKBM/677 Owor Moses 1,000 150 1,150 REA/AKBM/678 Okello Albino 23,500 3,525 27,025 ABANYA 'A' REA/AKBM/679 Juspin Akello 197,000 29,550 226,550 REA/AKBM/680 Ocen Ambrose 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/681 Okello Yurumoi 14,500 2,175 16,675 REA/AKBM/682 Emat Joyce Ongom 49,500 7,425 56,925 REA/AKBM/683 Owiny Saidi 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/684 Ocila Odongo 38,000 5,700 43,700 REA/AKBM/685 Odongo Willy 51,000 7,650 58,650 REA/AKBM/686 Ocen Augustine 120,000 18,000 138,000 REA/AKBM/687 Kinyera John Bosco 35,000 5,250 40,250 REA/AKBM/688 Otim Justine 86,000 12,900 98,900 REA/AKBM/689 Omara Alfred 36,000 5,400 41,400 REA/AKBM/690 Obote Martin 53,000 7,950 60,950 REA/AKBM/691 Owelo Jimmy 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/692 Okello Vicent 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/693 Okello Ngai 32,900 4,935 37,835 REA/AKBM/694 Otoo Alino 32,900 4,935 37,835 REA/AKBM/695 Pamela Akello 108,000 16,200 124,200 REA/AKBM/696 Omara Patrick 40,000 6,000 46,000 83 ALYEC REA/AKBM/697 Terensio Omwony 67,000 10,050 77,050 REA/AKBM/698 Karens Apoto 16,000 2,400 18,400 REA/AKBM/699 Joyce Angiru 90,000 13,500 103,500 REA/AKBM/700 Okello Nick 92,000 13,800 105,800 REA/AKBM/701 Ogoro Alfred 2,000 300 2,300 REA/AKBM/702 Ogwal Dickens 22,000 3,300 25,300 REA/AKBM/703 Opio Charlse 67,500 10,125 77,625 REA/AKBM/704 Odongo Raymond 41,000 6,150 47,150 REA/AKBM/705 Abok John 209,000 31,350 240,350 REA/AKBM/706 Okello Jimmy 35,000 5,250 40,250 REA/AKBM/707 Otwal Nelson 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/708 Ojok Awar 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/709 Fabiano Welo 121,000 18,150 139,150 REA/AKBM/710 Ojok Jack 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/711 Omach Lawrence 267,000 40,050 307,050 REA/AKBM/712 Odida Vicent 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/713 Okello Richard 87,500 13,125 100,625 REA/AKBM/714 Ilwar Raymond 225,000 33,750 258,750 REA/AKBM/715 Omara Salvor 500,000 75,000 575,000 REA/AKBM/716 Ojok Jimmy 2,000 300 2,300 84 REA/AKBM/717 Ogwang Patrick 10,500 1,575 12,075 PUKICA REA/AKBM/718 Ayang Lillian 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/719 Opendo James 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/720 Ocen Mark 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/721 Okello Richard 36,000 5,400 41,400 REA/AKBM/722 Opio Geofrey 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/723 Odongo Richard 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/724 Ongole Bosco 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/725 Aleny Primary School 50,000 7,500 57,500 BOROBORO 'B' REA/AKBM/726 C/O Ogwal Terence 180,500 27,075 207,575 REA/AKBM/727 Bosco Onyanga 89,000 13,350 102,350 REA/AKBM/728 Okello Ejep 17,000 2,550 19,550 REA/AKBM/729 Otuk Richard 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/730 Otoo Akol 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/731 Owingi Patrick 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/732 Ochen Quinto 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/733 Okoko Patrick 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/734 Opio Tobby 5,000 750 5,750 BOROBORO 'A' 85 REA/AKBM/735 Florence Opio 130,000 19,500 149,500 REA/AKBM/736 Adiyo Raymond 12,000 1,800 13,800 REA/AKBM/737 Achaya Richard 7,000 1,050 8,050 REA/AKBM/738 Ochol Patrick 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/739 Atim Robert 9,000 1,350 10,350 REA/AKBM/740 Ochon Patrick 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/741 Owar Sam 15,000 2,250 17,250 REA/AKBM/742 Okello Francis 6,000 900 6,900 REA/AKBM/743 Atim Quinto 2,000 300 2,300 BAROLIMO REA/AKBM/744 Arido Joel 15,000 2,250 17,250 REA/AKBM/745 Ogwang Johnson 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/746 Ojok Paul 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/747 Omari 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/748 Odur Richard 2,000 300 2,300 REA/AKBM/749 Edule Innocent 50,000 7,500 57,500 ARUKU LONG REA/AKBM/750 Acila Felix 92,000 13,800 105,800 REA/AKBM/751 Ayo Alfred 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/752 Otim Benedict 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/753 Laba 65,000 9,750 74,750 86 REA/AKBM/754 Otim Lawrence 120,000 18,000 138,000 REA/AKBM/755 Odongo Joseph 5,000 750 5,750 MYENE SUBCOUNTY ABANG TRADING CENTRE REA/AKBM/756 Ogang Alex 44,625 6,694 51,319 REA/AKBM/757 Adupa Quinto 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/758 Ameny Robert 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/759 Ogwang Amos 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/760 Adupa Peter 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/761 Adigi Charlse 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/762 Okola Geofrey 6,300 945 7,245 REA/AKBM/763 Okello Denis 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/764 Egach George 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/765 Okello Das 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/766 Owoola Bosco 45,000 6,750 51,750 REA/AKBM/767 Omara Felix 60,000 9,000 69,000 REA/AKBM/768 Clama Alex 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/769 Ministry of Works 62,000 9,300 71,300 REA/AKBM/770 Nyoro Bonny 10,238 1,536 11,774 REA/AKBM/771 Angwech Dorcus 60,000 9,000 69,000 REA/AKBM/772 Olila Ernesto 52,000 7,800 59,800 87 ABAKO REA/AKBM/773 Obote Jimmy 11,000 1,650 12,650 REA/AKBM/774 Obote Margret 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/775 Odongo Florence 45,000 6,750 51,750 REA/AKBM/776 Atik Robert 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/777 Okello Daniel 12,000 1,800 13,800 REA/AKBM/778 Wokorach Denis 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/779 Okello Samuel 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/780 Okello Tony 9,788 1,468 11,256 REA/AKBM/781 Omara Constantino 71,500 10,725 82,225 REA/AKBM/782 Oyio Sam 12,500 1,875 14,375 AMWA TRADING CENTRE REA/AKBM/783 Okello Tony Oguta 13,875 2,081 15,956 REA/AKBM/784 Omara Akoch 30,500 4,575 35,075 REA/AKBM/785 Ayo Sam 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/786 Wana Patrick 1,000 150 1,150 REA/AKBM/787 Ogang Hassan 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/788 Alodo Lilly 47,000 7,050 54,050 REA/AKBM/789 Angwe Robert 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/790 Ojok Patrick 22,000 3,300 25,300 REA/AKBM/791 Ayo Kojjo 202,000 30,300 232,300 88 REA/AKBM/792 Okot Mustafa 75,000 11,250 86,250 REA/AKBM/793 Adupa Walter 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/794 Olugu Ocen 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/795 Ayo James 13,000 1,950 14,950 REA/AKBM/796 Opira Bonny 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/797 Olwa 75,000 11,250 86,250 REA/AKBM/798 Aweri Luzino 7,000 1,050 8,050 REA/AKBM/799 Odongo Pacelle 60,000 9,000 69,000 REA/AKBM/800 Egoo Richard 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/801 Odongo 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/802 Obong Jeventino 60,000 9,000 69,000 REA/AKBM/803 Olwii James 65,000 9,750 74,750 REA/AKBM/804 Olwii Robert 100,000 15,000 115,000 REA/AKBM/805 Rose Otim 285,000 42,750 327,750 REA/AKBM/806 Odongo Richard 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/807 Oduka Coxson 15,000 2,250 17,250 REA/AKBM/808 Odongo Geofrey 35,000 5,250 40,250 REA/AKBM/809 Awor Christine 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/810 Omonya Michael 287,000 43,050 330,050 REA/AKBM/811 Okello Richard 12,000 1,800 13,800 REA/AKBM/812 Omara J.B. 50,000 7,500 57,500 89 REA/AKBM/813 Oyera Moses 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/814 Omuta Justo 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/815 Opio Daniel 152,500 22,875 175,375 REA/AKBM/816 Kojjo Lawrence 127,000 19,050 146,050 REA/AKBM/817 Adong Concy 39,500 5,925 45,425 REA/AKBM/818 Okiro Ojok 30,000 4,500 34,500 AMWA HEADQUARTERS REA/AKBM/819 Ekwang Jolly 41,000 6,150 47,150 REA/AKBM/820 Arach Fred 27,000 4,050 31,050 REA/AKBM/821 Omara Francis 41,480 6,222 47,702 REA/AKBM/822 Omara Stephen 1,000 150 1,150 REA/AKBM/823 Adong Lilly 11,700 1,755 13,455 REA/AKBM/824 Ongari Jolly 13,000 1,950 14,950 REA/AKBM/825 Odongo Robert 10,625 1,594 12,219 REA/AKBM/826 Biron Itot 2,500 375 2,875 REA/AKBM/827 Odongo Ray 47,000 7,050 54,050 REA/AKBM/828 Olwa Elbagilo 34,500 5,175 39,675 REA/AKBM/829 Agweng Molly 72,813 10,922 83,735 REA/AKBM/830 Olwa Yakobo 18,000 2,700 20,700 REA/AKBM/831 Otim Geofrey 110,000 16,500 126,500 REA/AKBM/832 Omuta Victor 150,500 22,575 173,075 90 REA/AKBM/833 Ogwang Tony 39,000 5,850 44,850 REA/AKBM/834 Okello Lawrence 18,500 2,775 21,275 REA/AKBM/835 Angwet Sam 42,500 6,375 48,875 WARING REA/AKBM/836 Okoyi Rose 10,200 1,530 11,730 REA/AKBM/837 Inyak Denis 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/838 Olet Silvesto 33,500 5,025 38,525 REA/AKBM/839 Otoo Tony 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/840 Achan Philiph 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/841 Okoko Richard 500 75 575 REA/AKBM/842 Oyengo Francis 15,000 2,250 17,250 REA/AKBM/843 Ojok Albino 98,500 14,775 113,275 REA/AKBM/844 Okello Quinto 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/845 Okello William 11,000 1,650 12,650 REA/AKBM/846 Aboke Robert 52,000 7,800 59,800 REA/AKBM/847 Olobo Geofrey 17,000 2,550 19,550 REA/AKBM/848 Tito Okello 44,000 6,600 50,600 REA/AKBM/849 Ayo Richard 22,000 3,300 25,300 REA/AKBM/850 Omara John 6,000 900 6,900 REA/AKBM/851 Olobo Geofrey 30,500 4,575 35,075 REA/AKBM/852 Otim Alex 4,000 600 4,600 MINAKULU SUBCOUNTY OPATI 'B' 91 REA/AKBM/853 Ekwang Richard 67,500 10,125 77,625 REA/AKBM/854 Odongo Francis 156,500 23,475 179,975 OPATI 'A' REA/AKBM/855 Ojok Hudson 15,000 2,250 17,250 REA/AKBM/856 Ocen Patrick 70,000 10,500 80,500 REA/AKBM/857 Aget Kalsto 64,000 9,600 73,600 REA/AKBM/858 Abanya David 59,000 8,850 67,850 REA/AKBM/859 Obua Denis 35,000 5,250 40,250 LANGO REA/AKBM/860 Ojok Peter 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/861 Opunyo Sam 68,750 10,313 79,063 REA/AKBM/862 Kiwanuka 27,000 4,050 31,050 REA/AKBM/863 Odongo Francis 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/864 Ogweng Richard 65,000 9,750 74,750 REA/AKBM/865 Engola Pius 13,000 1,950 14,950 REA/AKBM/866 Okiba Sam 21,000 3,150 24,150 REA/AKBM/867 Ongom Francis 21,000 3,150 24,150 REA/AKBM/868 Oloa Robert 45,000 6,750 51,750 REA/AKBM/869 Ayo Sam 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/870 Engola Pius 51,250 7,688 58,938 REA/AKBM/871 Acipa Sylvia 12,500 1,875 14,375 92 REA/AKBM/872 Adupa Alex 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/873 Engola Richard 10,750 1,613 12,363 BOBI REA/AKBM/874 Ojok Peter 90,000 13,500 103,500 REA/AKBM/875 Ogola Bonny 20,375 3,056 23,431 REA/AKBM/876 Abila Enestina 70,000 10,500 80,500 REA/AKBM/877 Ocen Patrick 46,500 6,975 53,475 REA/AKBM/878 Kilama 123,000 18,450 141,450 REA/AKBM/879 Sabina Kiba 575,000 86,250 661,250 REA/AKBM/880 Odongo Walter 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/881 Okello Lawrence 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/882 Otwal Lawrence 47,000 7,050 54,050 REA/AKBM/883 Mone David 75,000 11,250 86,250 REA/AKBM/884 Ojok Robert 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/885 Otim Moses 10,000 1,500 11,500 TEYAO REA/AKBM/886 Lia Richard 1,000 150 1,150 REA/AKBM/887 Oryenyo Joel 44,500 6,675 51,175 REA/AKBM/888 Okello Geofrey 23,150 3,473 26,623 OMOLO REA/AKBM/889 Atiro Shabin 13,875 2,081 15,956 93 REA/AKBM/890 Awuma Loy 11,875 1,781 13,656 REA/AKBM/891 Ogwang Robert 22,750 3,413 26,163 REA/AKBM/892 Nyero Moses 9,000 1,350 10,350 REA/AKBM/893 Opio Patrick 176,688 26,503 203,191 REA/AKBM/894 Otoo Quinto 157,000 23,550 180,550 REA/AKBM/895 Odongo Simon 142,500 21,375 163,875 REA/AKBM/896 Oyet Silvio 56,000 8,400 64,400 REA/AKBM/897 Omara Bob 43,000 6,450 49,450 REA/AKBM/898 Okodi Charlse 76,000 11,400 87,400 REA/AKBM/899 Bongo Felix 140,000 21,000 161,000 REA/AKBM/900 Awuma Grace 36,500 5,475 41,975 REA/AKBM/901 Abor David 40,000 6,000 46,000 ALATI 'A' REA/AKBM/902 Bongo Felix 44,000 6,600 50,600 REA/AKBM/903 Onyik Geofrey Paul 36,000 5,400 41,400 REA/AKBM/904 Awar George 500 75 575 REA/AKBM/905 Ocen Denis 49,705 7,456 57,161 REA/AKBM/906 Ogwang Alterio 31,250 4,688 35,938 REA/AKBM/907 Ogom Bosco 15,313 2,297 17,610 REA/AKBM/908 Ogwang Alterio 8,125 1,219 9,344 REA/AKBM/909 Ogwete Miseari 1,000 150 1,150 94 REA/AKBM/910 Ogwang David 33,000 4,950 37,950 ARAK EAST REA/AKBM/911 Okite 17,000 2,550 19,550 REA/AKBM/912 Acen Selina 32,000 4,800 36,800 REA/AKBM/913 Ocoo Tom 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/914 Jooreye 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/915 Ogwang Peter 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/916 Ebong Alex 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/917 Erem Moses 46,000 6,900 52,900 REA/AKBM/918 Awal Francis 79,500 11,925 91,425 REA/AKBM/919 Ogwang Cipriano 2,000 300 2,300 REA/AKBM/920 Owiny Vicent 25,000 3,750 28,750 REA/AKBM/921 Erem Robert 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/922 Okello Charlse 120,000 18,000 138,000 REA/AKBM/923 Odeya Bosco 100,000 15,000 115,000 REA/AKBM/924 Ojok Leo 170,000 25,500 195,500 REA/AKBM/925 Erem Geofrey 9,000 1,350 10,350 REA/AKBM/926 Ojok Bosco 65,000 9,750 74,750 REA/AKBM/927 Ayo Alex 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/928 Obang Patrick 70,000 10,500 80,500 REA/AKBM/929 Madam Ana Akao 1,000 150 1,150 95 REA/AKBM/930 Dengo Ejebyo 155,000 23,250 178,250 REA/AKBM/931 Okello Geofrey 106,000 15,900 121,900 REA/AKBM/932 Owo John Odyambo 37,500 5,625 43,125 ODYANYO REA/AKBM/933 Anyuru Richard 4,000 600 4,600 AKUKI EAST REA/AKBM/934 Ogwere Vincent 306,000 45,900 351,900 REA/AKBM/935 Olobo Kasim 30,875 4,631 35,506 REA/AKBM/936 Oyepa Simon 24,915 3,737 28,652 REA/AKBM/937 Menya Christopher 4,000 600 4,600 REA/AKBM/938 Okunu Nickson 25,000 3,750 28,750 REA/AKBM/939 Welo Vicent 101,500 15,225 116,725 REA/AKBM/940 Menya Christopher 12,000 1,800 13,800 REA/AKBM/941 Ayo Patrick 4,024 604 4,628 REA/AKBM/942 Awio Beatrice 18,870 2,831 21,701 REA/AKBM/943 Moto Wilfred 73,000 10,950 83,950 REA/AKBM/944 Akulu Aidah 7,400 1,110 8,510 REA/AKBM/945 Apio Lucy 3,000 450 3,450 REA/AKBM/946 Ogwang Simon Peter 29,500 4,425 33,925 REA/AKBM/947 Asio Betty 4,400 660 5,060 REA/AKBM/948 Odida Francis 25,000 3,750 28,750 REA/AKBM/949 Yakobo Olugu 24,500 3,675 28,175 96 REA/AKBM/950 Onyeki George 16,000 2,400 18,400 REA/AKBM/951 Otoo Tom 12,000 1,800 13,800 REA/AKBM/952 Alele Jusphine 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/953 Tile Geofrey 1,500 225 1,725 REA/AKBM/954 Oyo Lawrence 140,800 21,120 161,920 REA/AKBM/955 Ocen Fred 12,500 1,875 14,375 REA/AKBM/956 Ochong Richard 7,000 1,050 8,050 REA/AKBM/957 Okello Martin 3,000 450 3,450 REA/AKBM/958 Odongo Jasper 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/959 Acut Jimmy 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/960 Okello Richard 11,770 1,766 13,536 REA/AKBM/961 Obua Susan 14,375 2,156 16,531 REA/AKBM/962 Arawu Rose 60,875 9,131 70,006 ALOLEKWE REA/AKBM/963 Oming Moses 26,500 3,975 30,475 REA/AKBM/964 Oyugi Mark 93,663 14,049 107,712 REA/AKBM/965 Oyugi Mark 46,950 7,043 53,993 NGUTCATI REA/AKBM/966 Joyce Obong 79,000 11,850 90,850 REA/AKBM/967 Oryet Jimmy 80,000 12,000 92,000 REA/AKBM/968 Adoch Florence 117,875 17,681 135,556 97 REA/AKBM/969 Owani Bosco 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/970 Oryem Denis 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/971 Owani Alfonse 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/972 Christine Magoti 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/973 Ojok Santo 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/974 Moro Lawrence 35,000 5,250 40,250 REA/AKBM/975 Albina Otim 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/976 Otim Wilbert 139,063 20,859 159,922 REA/AKBM/977 Omara Alfred 171,125 25,669 196,794 REA/AKBM/978 Okello Jimmy 7,975 1,196 9,171 REA/AKBM/979 Opwonya Patrick 8,388 1,258 9,646 REA/AKBM/980 Byarugaba Richard 2,000 300 2,300 REA/AKBM/981 Moro Francis 8,000 1,200 9,200 REA/AKBM/982 Sylvester Ogwal 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/983 Ongulu Otim 90,500 13,575 104,075 REA/AKBM/984 Omoro Serogam 57,000 8,550 65,550 COO PE BWONE REA/AKBM/985 Adel Primary School 232,500 34,875 267,375 REA/AKBM/986 Minakulu Parish 1,857,375 278,606 2,135,981 MINAKULU TRADING CENTRE 'B' REA/AKBM/987 Ogwang Emmanuel 60,000 9,000 69,000 98 REA/AKBM/988 Odongo Julius Peter 36,000 5,400 41,400 REA/AKBM/989 Omara Leo 121,500 18,225 139,725 REA/AKBM/990 Atim Agnes 56,000 8,400 64,400 REA/AKBM/991 Olaka Tony 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/992 Okai Wilbert 80,000 12,000 92,000 REA/AKBM/993 Oryang Geofrey 60,000 9,000 69,000 REA/AKBM/994 Ogwete Vicent 31,000 4,650 35,650 REA/AKBM/995 Bala Abdalah 25,000 3,750 28,750 REA/AKBM/996 Agwata Tom 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/997 Agwai Raymond 351,375 52,706 404,081 REA/AKBM/998 Ogwal Francis 63,505 9,526 73,031 REA/AKBM/999 Olet Richard 80,406 12,061 92,467 REA/AKBM/1000 Otim Alfred 31,000 4,650 35,650 REA/AKBM/1001 Okori Lawrence 35,000 5,250 40,250 MINAKULU TRADING CENTRE 'A' REA/AKBM/1002 Opio Lawrence 185,500 27,825 213,325 REA/AKBM/1003 Okot Denis 7,000 1,050 8,050 REA/AKBM/1004 Apunyu Tony 12,000 1,800 13,800 REA/AKBM/1005 Opio Albino 14,500 2,175 16,675 REA/AKBM/1006 Omonyi Tony 11,500 1,725 13,225 REA/AKBM/1007 Oyugi Robert 50,000 7,500 57,500 99 REA/AKBM/1008 Okello Ceaser 92,500 13,875 106,375 REA/AKBM/1009 Opio Walter 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/1010 Lagada Silvesto 7,000 1,050 8,050 REA/AKBM/1011 Otoo Patrick 32,000 4,800 36,800 REA/AKBM/1012 Ocho Richard 22,500 3,375 25,875 REA/AKBM/1013 Akai Stella 2,000 300 2,300 REA/AKBM/1014 Angulu Gaetano 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/1015 Ekong Alfonsio 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/1016 Akao Stella 18,000 2,700 20,700 REA/AKBM/1017 Okumu Rose 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/1018 Oryang Fabio 50,000 7,500 57,500 REA/AKBM/1019 Okech Philiph 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/1020 Amenya Alex 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/1021 Adupa Doreen 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/1022 Obal Geofrey 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/1023 Akol Alfonse 84,000 12,600 96,600 REA/AKBM/1024 Ituk Sipi 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/1025 Ojera Martin 25,000 3,750 28,750 REA/AKBM/1026 Ogwang Sam 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/1027 Ogom Robert 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/1028 Ogwang Joe 20,000 3,000 23,000 100 REA/AKBM/1029 Olobo John 40,000 6,000 46,000 REA/AKBM/1030 Obote Richard 20,000 3,000 23,000 REA/AKBM/1031 Atiang Lachere 45,000 6,750 51,750 REA/AKBM/1032 Orech Nelson 62,000 9,300 71,300 REA/AKBM/1033 Okot Christine 3,500 525 4,025 REA/AKBM/1034 Odongo Lwanga 47,000 7,050 54,050 REA/AKBM/1035 Ayo Nelson 45,000 6,750 51,750 REA/AKBM/1036 Ojok Innocent 12,000 1,800 13,800 REA/AKBM/1037 Owuma 35,000 5,250 40,250 REA/AKBM/1038 Okello Charlse 29,500 4,425 33,925 REA/AKBM/1039 Bua Yakobo 60,000 9,000 69,000 REA/AKBM/1040 Alobo Paul 44,000 6,600 50,600 REA/AKBM/1041 Okello Justine 30,000 4,500 34,500 AROMONYONGO REA/AKBM/1042 Akwin 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/1043 Okello Justine 21,000 3,150 24,150 REA/AKBM/1044 Omodo Geofrey 45,000 6,750 51,750 REA/AKBM/1045 Acako Anjuleta 2,000 300 2,300 REA/AKBM/1046 Adwong Kilara 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/1047 Odongo George 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/1048 Omach Geofrey 50,000 7,500 57,500 101 REA/AKBM/1049 Omara Douglas 52,500 7,875 60,375 REA/AKBM/1050 Oryang Dominic 12,500 1,875 14,375 REA/AKBM/1051 Bua Thomas 100,000 15,000 115,000 REA/AKBM/1052 Okello Nobert 77,500 11,625 89,125 REA/AKBM/1053 Apolo Halima 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/1054 Ogwal Denis Dicken 30,000 4,500 34,500 REA/AKBM/1055 Ongom Raymond 39,500 5,925 45,425 REA/AKBM/1056 Okello Innocent 181,000 27,150 208,150 REA/AKBM/1057 Gabriel Oling Olang 254,000 38,100 292,100 REA/AKBM/1058 Ongom Basil 409,500 61,425 470,925 REA/AKBM/1059 Alobo John 47,000 7,050 54,050 REA/AKBM/1060 Opio Bul 32,000 4,800 36,800 REA/AKBM/1061 Ongom Geofrey 290,000 43,500 333,500 REA/AKBM/1062 Ocen Peter 9,000 1,350 10,350 REA/AKBM/1063 Ongom Geofrey 2,038,000 305,700 2,343,700 BOBI SUBCOUNTY IDIPO REA/AKBM/1064 Achan Jusphine 117,500 17,625 135,125 REA/AKBM/1065 Cathrine Janjok 57,000 8,550 65,550 REA/AKBM/1066 Oryema Peter 12,000 1,800 13,800 REA/AKBM/1067 Owor .A. Thomas 43,000 6,450 49,450 102 REA/AKBM/1068 Nyeko Kenedy 106,000 15,900 121,900 REA/AKBM/1069 Anek Marther 150,000 22,500 172,500 REA/AKBM/1070 Ongom Alfred 175,000 26,250 201,250 REA/AKBM/1071 Inyang Stephen 33,375 5,006 38,381 REA/AKBM/1072 Karen Okello 4,000 600 4,600 REA/AKBM/1073 Owor Ray 38,000 5,700 43,700 REA/AKBM/1074 Bhazil Opoka 4,000 600 4,600 REA/AKBM/1075 Akuru David 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/1076 Ongier-giu Kenedy 129,000 19,350 148,350 REA/AKBM/1077 Okello Onyany 7,000 1,050 8,050 REA/AKBM/1078 Acaye Goddy 2,000 300 2,300 REA/AKBM/1079 Okumu Alfred 32,000 4,800 36,800 REA/AKBM/1080 Mohammed 24,000 3,600 27,600 REA/AKBM/1081 Akello Rose 56,000 8,400 64,400 REA/AKBM/1082 Agwayi Opoka 10,000 1,500 11,500 REA/AKBM/1083 Akii Jasper 7,000 1,050 8,050 OBALOWAT REA/AKBM/1084 Odongo Isaac 29,000 4,350 33,350 REA/AKBM/1085 Sarafino Ochong 2,500 375 2,875 REA/AKBM/1086 Atoo Geofrey 7,000 1,050 8,050 REA/AKBM/1087 Adero Neko 18,000 2,700 20,700 103 REA/AKBM/1088 Ojok (Son of Olugu) 7,000 1,050 8,050 REA/AKBM/1089 Akao Cecelia 7,000 1,050 8,050 REA/AKBM/1090 Onek Caro 4,000 600 4,600 REA/AKBM/1091 Okidi Richard 6,500 975 7,475 REA/AKBM/1092 Opio Anania 4,500 675 5,175 REA/AKBM/1093 Sunday Mpairwe Patrick 8,509 1,276 9,785 REA/AKBM/1094 Ogwal Patrick 11,419 1,713 13,132 REA/AKBM/1095 Mariano Odoki 25,000 3,750 28,750 AWII MON WARD REA/AKBM/1096 Ogwal Fred 9,500 1,425 10,925 St. Thomas P/Sch. REA/AKBM/1097 84,000 12,600 96,600 Minakulu REA/AKBM/1098 Palwo Parish Minakulu 36,500 5,475 41,975 REA/AKBM/1099 Olinga Boniface 20,500 3,075 23,575 REA/AKBM/1100 Odaga Bai 223,700 33,555 257,255 REA/AKBM/1101 Odongo Acha 8,813 1,322 10,135 REA/AKBM/1102 Obak Richard 38,340 5,751 44,091 REA/AKBM/1103 Ayela Patrick 14,100 2,115 16,215 REA/AKBM/1104 Okello Acit 60,875 9,131 70,006 REA/AKBM/1105 Komakech Moses 46,500 6,975 53,475 REA/AKBM/1106 Ojok Odongo Opuk 14,750 2,213 16,963 REA/AKBM/1107 Omara Ajulio 43,200 6,480 49,680 104 REA/AKBM/1108 Ochen Mark 31,125 4,669 35,794 REA/AKBM/1109 Amone Alice 52,000 7,800 59,800 KULU OTIT REA/AKBM/1110 Odongo Lwanga 157,500 23,625 181,125 REA/AKBM/1111 Okot Nuru 62,125 9,319 71,444 REA/AKBM/1112 Omony Geofrey 69,550 10,433 79,983 REA/AKBM/1113 Tereza 49,250 7,388 56,638 REA/AKBM/1114 Odong Sudan 51,250 7,688 58,938 REA/AKBM/1115 Okello Ceaser 27,250 4,088 31,338 REA/AKBM/1116 Obak Vincent 21,750 3,263 25,013 REA/AKBM/1117 Ameny Peter 19,000 2,850 21,850 REA/AKBM/1118 Aneka Ekuka Camilo 35,000 5,250 40,250 REA/AKBM/1119 Otim Albino 15,000 2,250 17,250 REA/AKBM/1120 Banya Otim 274,000 41,100 315,100 REA/AKBM/1121 Awio Innocent 67,000 10,050 77,050 REA/AKBM/1122 Ongole Celestino 1,500 225 1,725 REA/AKBM/1123 Atine Ongole 17,500 2,625 20,125 REA/AKBM/1124 Adoch Betorina 48,125 7,219 55,344 REA/AKBM/1125 Obonyo Ceke 32,000 4,800 36,800 REA/AKBM/1126 Labeja 136,000 20,400 156,400 REA/AKBM/1127 Omara Rufino 117,500 17,625 135,125 105 PATO TRADING CENTRE REA/AKBM/1128 Amongi Grace 5,500 825 6,325 REA/AKBM/1129 Okot Felix 43,000 6,450 49,450 REA/AKBM/1130 Odongo Boniface 2,000 300 2,300 REA/AKBM/1131 Atube Nelson 5,000 750 5,750 REA/AKBM/1132 Opio Jasper 41,000 6,150 47,150 REA/AKBM/1133 Opira Simon 374,500 56,175 430,675 REA/AKBM/1134 Obur 36,000 5,400 41,400 REA/AKBM/1135 Alonyo Doreen 23,513 3,527 27,040 REA/AKBM/1136 Okello Abic 44,013 6,602 50,615 REA/AKBM/1137 Otoo Bosco 6,500 975 7,475 REA/AKBM/1138 Ogwang Tony Blair 4,875 731 5,606 REA/AKBM/1139 Odongo Moses 2,000 300 2,300 Olango Michael and REA/AKBM/1140 25,000 3,750 28,750 Oyuru John REA/AKBM/1141 Oyuru John 44,000 6,600 50,600 Bobi Subcounty REA/AKBM/1142 19,000 2,850 21,850 Headquarters Bobi Community REA/AKBM/1143 202,500 30,375 232,875 Polytechnic GRAND TOTAL (USH) 95,675,252 106 ANNEX 2: MINUTES OF COMMUNITY MEETINGS Date Location Concerns Raised Recommendations 02/09/10 Aboke Mowlem Issue of putting up a transformer rose, who will be concerned with putting it up. Local leaders suggest government does that in order to truly benefit the people. Concern raised that since independence this issue of a step down generator has been raised but nothing done about Members were it. informed that everyone will benefit no matter Question asked that which side of the road since the power line they are on. is on one side of the road, will the REA to follow up in people on the project execution opposite side get power. Issue raised that the major problem of Aboke is a step down, is needed for the improvement of Aboke health center, secondary school, primary school, trading center. All these show that the area is developing but no power. 107 02/09/10 Loro Sub Concerns about Relevant district County whether they will be authorities to follow up given a transformer. Question asked about whether they will get security lights in their areas. Communities were Issue about the informed that questions that the information would be social team will ask, used to design that after being compensation packages asked these for affected persons as questions will well as livelihood something be done restoration activities. for them after they give out their details. Question asked that Communities were since the power line informed that the will pass nearby government will their school provide the (primary) will transformer. government give the primary school power. Question asked that the transformer to provide power in the area, will it be bought by government or the project affected persons. L.C.11 vice chairman, Odera Alfred in his closing remarks encouraged 108 community to cooperate with team, and to pass on the message to those who are not around. 03/09/10 Ongor/Entebbe Member asked Contractor should give Trading Centre whether they will be the affected given work to help communities first in putting up the priority in job power line. recruitment. REA to monitor progress of such positive benefits Concerned about Details are highlighted crops destroyed, in this report how they will be compensated. More sensitization on the role of REA in Issue of whether service delivery this project is political, informed that it is from government and has nothing to do with politics. Issue of having Community members poles on one side of informed that most the road, does that service delivery is mean those on the driven by the needs of other side will not communities and these get power. will be taken into account Will this power line Communities were supply public informed that given institutions like that impacts of the churches, hospitals project are low it is and schools unlikely that many people will be affected Concern of if people refuse to allow power officials to work or destroy 109 property on their land. Mr. Buluro area councilor said that the people of this area have welcomed the idea of power; his only request is that we employ the locals and buy poles from them to benefit the members. 03/09/10 Iyani Will crops found in Informed they will and the right of way be particulars of which compensated? ones exactly. That sometime back when another group came and put up cables, dug trenches they were told it was a road reserve, no one was paid. That if a pole passes Informed that they will in someone’s move the poles and compound or above avoid the houses. someone’s house, what will be done? Are compensation Informed that trees and rates negotiable, can poles have fixed values PAP’s bargain? that government has set. What if a pole falls Community health and and kills someone, safety mitigation will the government measures to be compensate the highlighted in the ESIA affected one. 04/09/10 Gwokoneno Issue raised that in Informed that the the past, villages transformer put in Inya 110 around where given will supply a big area, it a transformer but does not necessarily they did not get. mean every area or Wants to know if it village gets a will be the same this transformer. time. Asks why they do not put a transformer in the trading center. Community Informed that if they members wondered want power in their whether they would houses they will have to be charged for buy poles for poles. themselves and that rural electrification will Will this project be in charge of that. provide the youth with jobs. Informed that yes, there Suggestion made is cutting of trees, that villagers are putting poles. Much willing to do the cheaper to get workers cutting of trees, from here. clearing and digging holes. What if the power line is passing over the graveyard? Informed that it is not Concern of whether likely because the line is those affected along passing in the road the line coming reserve. from the PTC are going to be compensated. 04/09/2010 Loro Township Are we going to Informed of the give transformers to different area where the every trading transformers are going center? to be put. What is the method Informed on what crops of compensation, will be considered and 111 what is going to be compensated exactly? Complain that there is no transformer in Amido Trading center. Members wondered Informed that after this how soon the exercise of valuation project was going to and establishing the start? cost of construction then it will be begin. Are the PAP’s going Informed that before to be paid after the the project starts. project or before? Incase poles or wires break and destroy someone’s property, how will they be compensated. 04/09/2010 Obangongera Chairman L.C.1 Informed that we are Trading Centre asks whether they concerned with the new are going to pay for one. the coming power line or the old one as well. When the power Informed that no house line passes over a will be destroyed. house is it destroyed. Will security lights Informed that it is up be provided? to the community to organize themselves for this. Will we be Informed that it is up to 112 supplying power to them to apply to REA people’s homes? and be connected to the grid. Will there be a gap Informed that they have between the existing to meet. power line and new one? That the previous A grievance mechanism power line planners has been proposed in did not compensate this report and will be them, what disclosed to community procedures should members they use in case they have complaints they want to pass on? When will they start Informed after paying for this valuation and before project? they put up the poles. What rates do they Informed that they can use for get the rates at the compensation and district office. what are they. Are surveyors going to pay them some small money when they pass in their areas or land? 06/09/2010 Odike TC When a pole falls on Informed that rural a house, will they electrification will compensate? compensate them Will those on the opposite side of the road get power? What of having Informed that they will power in the have to apply to REA 113 houses? Will there be Informed it is up to the security lights put town council to put up up? that. What if the mango Informed that no, it will tree is in the way of cut down if it is in the the line, is one way. allowed to prune it instead of having it cut down? 07/09/2010 Kamdini Sub When a pole falls on Informed that rural County a house, will they electrification will Headquarters compensate? compensate them Where will the surveyors start from? Where will the Informed of the transformers be different areas where located? they will be. Does the Informed that REA is community pay a responsible for cost to get power in connecting them with the homes? power in their homes What if one wants Informed to build to build on their 15meters from the pole. land but there is a pole? 07/09/2010 Aruko Long What if the pole is Informed that the pole will Trading Centre on the house? not be placed on the house. What trees will be Informed that all those compensated? trees that individual benefits from will be compensated When will the Informed that right putting up of poles now they are just 114 start? planning for the route where the power line will pass. That the community is ready to provide labour. What are the Informed that the compesation rates district land board is for the trees? responsible for that. Concern of manual labour brought up, they kept insisting that they should be considered. What if one does Informed that the land not agree with the board first comes to the compensation rates ground before rates are paid and refuses fixed. what’s being offered. What should they do next? Should they go to court? 08/09/2010 Amwa Trading What about the Informed that poles will Centre grave yards, how do not be put on graves they affect electricity? Are we going to Informed the local council provide them with will be in charge of that. security lines? Are trees that are Informed that the trees going to be cut will remain there’s and down going to they can do as they please taken by us or will with them. remain? What if houses are 115 in the right of way, Informed poles will be what will be done? move to avoid the houses. Will construction of Informed yes there are poles and putting opportunities to employ up power lines them. provide us with employment? If one is on the opposite side of the road where there are no poles, will one get power. When will the construction start? Soon after the entire What will be the field information is cost of getting a collected. plow from one side of the road to another? That they should be Informed REA will be given a grace period in charge of that. to use power of one month for free. 08/09/2010 Aminomir Why are some trees Informed that others Trading Centre that are used for tress grow naturally food not also valued and are not planted like others? Is compensation Informed owners going to districts or themselves owners themselves? How much will it Informed that we do cost to have power not know the prices but in our houses? if used extravagantly then they will be charged highly. 116 Are community members going to be considered for some work when the construction starts? 08/09/2010 Awe Betty What if the poles Informed that the poles Trading Centre take a huge area of will be in the road the land? reserve. What if a pole is in line with a mango tree will it be cut down? Can REA buy the poles from us, informed they have to talk to rural electrification and REA for that? What is being used for payment, cards or meter box How long will it Informed as soon as we take for the project take the report back and to start? it is approved. With power in the Informed it will depend house, how much on how much power is will it cost? being used. 09/09/2010 Oyam District What about The team will put that people’s houses into record but no where the wire will payment will be made pass. unless there is a destruction or damage caused on the structure. Who would be in The bills are to be paid charge of paying the by the beneficiary of the electricity bills? power, just like water 117 One member was Informed no and that told that people the payment will be have already been done after the paid; he is asking assessment after the whether it is true. field data has been processed and presented to the government and World Bank. Will the locals be Informed it will be the involved in the contractors work to project? decide. What if one wants Informed no and that power in his house, they have to apply to will the government REA. provide for that? What is the extent of Informed only 10m the land taken by from tarmac. the line? How long will the power take to reach Minakulu tc? Will they provide a Informed no, and that generator metre box anyone who wants power for all? will apply to REA for the metre box as a routine. In case of damage caused by the The government will be power, who will be responsible. responsible? 09/09/2010 Bobi Sub What about trading The transformers County centers that are off distributed are effective to the main road; what distribute enough power plan is there for to the surrounding area them? the locals to write to REA if they need power in their homes. 118 When will the It has already started actual project start? assessment of damaged There are many and payment to be done houses within the before poles is put up. 10m length. What if the pole is The house will be spared to be placed where and poles adjusted. the house is, what However all structures will be done? will be noted during the assessment as earlier explained. 09/09/2010 Pato Trading Will the power In all, the community Centre serve only one side leaders demonstrated of the road? No it their need for power will serve all sides. and promised to cooperate when needed. 09/09/2010 Minakulu T.C Will there be need No it is in the project to pay for the poles that those poles be on the opposite side distributed along the off the road? road. Who will be in The security light is charge of putting up managed and paid for security lights? by the town council or the community as is done in other countries. How much is the Informed that we do collection fee to not know and that REA other households? is in charge of that? Why don’t they payInformed that they for cereal crops? easily harvest and grow them, they have short gestation periods and farmers can easily continue to grow the crops. How long will the Informed that it started programme take to already. Informed that it start? is not politics but a development programme. 119 Someone has been Informed that no money asking for 20,000 for will be asked for this bringing electricity project except when per household. is it individuals want power to part of the exercise.? their houses which will be at a later stage. 10/09/2010 Wirao Trading What will be done Transformers will be Centre to the residents on placed to step down the opposite side of power and this line will the road? run on the opposite side of the road to distribute the power to the households. A school is located Informed that, this 8km from the main project is limited to the road. Will the main road and a few government specified links, provide the school Anymore extensions with power? will be through a written request to REA office. How will the prices The valuers will use of trees be compensation rates established? made by the district to value all the agriculture and forest produce. The valuers do not decide on their own. What if the poles The poles will be position rests on a extended away from house what will be the houses. done? What if the transformer is not strong enough? What if the wire During construction it breaks and causes will be the contractor, damage. Who will after that it will be be responsible? government to pay for the damages. 120 If the transformer is damaged who will be responsible? 10/09/2010 Atapara The hospital Hospital requires more voltage than the 200kv given because more institutions and machines are being introduced in the area. There should be community involvement in work such as digging holes and clearing the way. When will the Soon, though payment project start? will be first be done. Where will power From corner molem, be tapped from? moving along the tarmac; at ayer t c, a branch or link will be made to the hospital. When will the crops Starting next week; but be counted? the locals will be informed first through the L C 1. Will they consider newly planted crops Yes; from seedlings to / trees? maturity all will be considered. Who will connect power to their The individuals will hire houses? qualified technicians to do Are we allowed to the work for them. continue using the Yes they can, but do not land / road reserve grow crops/ trees that will after the wires have grow tall and cause been placed? damage to the wires. 121 ANNEX 3: LAND OWNER /TENANT/LICENSEE VERIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE 33 KV Ayer-Kamdini-Minakulu-Bobi Distribution LINE Consultant: RESCO Names of Enumerator.................................................................... Date…………………………………. Section 1: Personal Identification Project Affected Age completed Sex Marital Status Highest level of Tribe Occupation Religion Serial no. on Date of Person years Education PAP’s copy enumeration Section 2: Location of Information District County Sub-County Parish LC II Village Plot Ref Designation Section 3: Ownership and Particulars of the affected Person What is your How did you Which From whom? Do you How do you For how long What is the Is there any What types of If tenant status in acquire this year did possess any hold this land? have you predominant encumbrances on this structures/Fix how much relation to the land? you land Title been on this land tenure land like; tures are on do you pay Land acquire the or affected plot? system in this this land? per month? ownership? land? Give Name agreement Sub county? for 1= In ownership possession of 1= yes, Claim by: or tenancy? title. 1= Since family members. 1= Residential 1= Owner 1= Bought 2= Inherited birth. 1 = Customary 2= Yes, mortgage/lien. only. but no title. 2= Licensee 2= Renting 1= Land 2= 0-10 years 2= Freehold 3= No, all documents 2= Residential Title 3=Tenant on tenure. available. and small 3= Tenant 3= Inherited titled land. 3=10-20 business. 2=Agreeme years 3= Leasehold 4= No, and no 4= Co-owner 4= Given as a nt 4= On public documentation 3=Small gift. land 4= over 20 4= Mailo land available. business 5= Co-Tenant 3=Tenancy (customary) years 5= Just settled 5= Other specify 5= I don’t know 6= Others 5= Other (Specify) 6= Other Specify 6= Other specify (Specify) Do you have Have you Are they Do you wish Which Is it one of the Indicate the Secondary Other activities done on this land that generate income. land holdings buried family in the right to relocate village? land holdings? main source source of elsewhere? members on of or way them? of income Income this land? If leave? yes, how many Section 4: Demographic Profile of affected Household Name Sex Age Relationship to What is your/their main How far is the How do What is your What is the Of what (yrs) HH Head occupation? work/school from you/they/get to marital status? highest level of religious here? work? education you/ affiliation XX is this 1= attained/currently HH? M 1 = Father 1= Private 1= in ? formal/manufacturing 1= At site Married/cohabiting 2=F 2= Wife 2= Private formal/service Record as stated 2= by public means 2= Single never 1= 3= Son married. 1= None Catholic 3= Private formal/retail 3= by personal 4= Daughter vehicle 3= Single separate/ 2= Primary school 2= 4= Student Divorced Protestant 5= Sister 4= by 3= Ordinary Level 5= Private informal/service 2= Not Applicable bicycle/motorcycle 4= Widow / 3= Islam 2 6= Brother 6= Private informal/retail 5= by foot widower 4= Tertiary Level 4= Other specify 7= Grand father 7= Private Agricultural 6= in boarding school 8= Grand mother 8= Public Government 7= other specify 9= Other 9= Non-governmental 8= Not applicable 10= Religious 11= Not employment Section 5: General Information concerning children How many children are below5 years old? How many children are How many are in primary level? How many are in How many are at going to schools? secondary level? University? By what means do Do you have any What is the nature of What is the type of Is the healthy facility How far is the nearest What is the major source they get to school? handicapped handicap? health facility in this located along the power Health Unit? of food for this persons living in this area? line right of way? household? HH? 1= Walk 1= Blind 1= Less than 5km 1= Hospital 1= Yes 1= Buy from the market 2= by public means 1 = Yes 2= Deaf/dumb 2= 5 – 10km 2= Health facility IV 2= No 2= Grown on this parcel 3= by private means 2 = No 3= Crippled 3= 10 or more 3= Health facility III 3=Don’t know 3= Grown elsewhere 4= Others 4= Mental 4= Health facility II 4= Other (Specify 5= Other 5= Health facility I 3 Section 6: Production Systems If grown on parcel, Does this HH keep If yes, which animals? If cultivation of crops, Where are these crops Who owns the land on What is the land tenure what proportion any animals or birds? what are the main grown? (Tick in the which you grow crops? for your land? contributes HH crops grown and how appropriate box) consumption? much does the (Elaborate on the scale 1= Birds Poultry household earn from of 10 and get the 1= Yes each crop? 1=HH head 1=Customary 2= Piggery 1=In the background of number that 2= No 1=Maize the household 2=Uncle 2=Freehold tenure contributes to total 3= Goats consumption) 2=Sweet potatoes 2=Farm 3=Wife 3=Leasehold 4= Cows 3=Cassava 3=Along the power 4=Clan 4=Mailo 5= Other (specify) line right of way 4=Beans 5=Landlord 5= Kibanja 5=Rice 6=Other (Specify) 6=Other (Specify). 6=Other (specify) Where do you usually sell What problems have you If livestock, what are the Where do you graze the livestock? What problems have you your produce? experienced in your main animals and how experienced in livestock production activities? much does the household rearing? (Multiple response) earn from each livestock 1= Private own land 1=drought 1= Don’t sell at all (Give details in table below) 2= Private borrowed land 2=lack of pasture/land 2= Local Market 1= Drought 3= Customary land 3=Animal disease 3= Outside market (far 2= Lack of sufficient land from home) 4= Public land 4= cattle theft 3= Lack of tools, like hoes 4= Outside the district 5= Hired 5=Expensive drugs 4= Lack of markets 4 5= Others (specify 5= Lack of good access to 6= Others (specify) 6=No help from Govt markets. Section 6: Socio Network and Support System Given the portion of your Where would you move to? Please give reasons for the How would you like your Do you have any relatives Do they live/is it within land that is marked for location preferred….. situation handled? living in this Sub-county? this parish? construction of a 0=Not applicable transmission line, do you 0=Not Applicable think that you need to 1=On same piece of land move to another place? 1=Land is mine 1=Compensation in cash 1= Yes 1= Yes 2=Buy land else where 1= Yes 2=It is cheaper 2=Land for land 2= No 2= No 3=To the city compensation 2= No 3=Schools and hospitals 4=Further upcountry near 3=House built for me 5=Other (Specify) 4=My clan stays there 4=Other (specify) 5=Other (Specify) Do you belong to any From whom do you Where do you bury; community organization in normally seek advice to this parish? solve your personal and HH problems? 1= Yes 1=Cemetery (Multiple response) 2= No 2=Bijja 1= Sister/Brother 4=On this land 2= Parents 5=other (specify) 3= Friends 4= Religious leader 5 5= Counseling Services 6= Other specify Section 8: Income of Affected Household What is the Main Source of What is the secondary source of What other activities generate Compared to other residents in What would you estimate to be income of the household income of the household income for this household this Parish, in what category of the total income for this HH standard of living would you put 0=No other this HH? 1= Salary 1= Salary 1= Fishing 2= Husbands Salary 2= Husbands Salary 2= Hunting (Enumerator use discretion to judge) 3= Business on land 3= Business on land 3= Poultry 4= Business located elsewhere 4= Business located elsewhere 4= Other 1= Rich 5= Rent collected from affected 5= Rent collected from affected land land 2= Average 6= Rent collected from elsewhere 6= Rent collected from elsewhere 3= Poor 7= Agriculture activity on affected 7= Agriculture activity on affected 4= Very Poor land land 8= Agriculture activity on land 8= Agriculture activity on land elsewhere elsewhere 9= Transfer income 9= Transfer income (Pension/handouts) (Pension/handouts) 10= Other specify Section 9: Health Hygiene and Sanitation 6 What are the most common When was a member of the family What type of Latrine do you use? What is the source of your water? What is the distance to the water diseases affecting your Family? last hospitalized? source 1= Pond/unprotected well 1= Bush 2= Protected well 1= Malaria 1= In the last week 1= 100 metres 2= Hole in ground 3= spring 2= Respiratory Track Infection 2= In the last month 2= 100-500 metres (RTI) 3= Pit latrine 4= Borehole 3= In the last 6 months 3= 500 – 1km 3= Diarrhea 4= VIP 5=Tap Water (Stand pipe) 4= Never 4=1 – 1.5km 4= HIV/AIDS/STD 5= Flush Toilet 6=Piped Water in house 5= over 5 km 5= Measles= 6=Communal Latrine 6= Intestinal Worms 7= Hernia 8= Other specify Next of Kin (Names) Relationship Address / Contact 1=Brother 2= Sister 3= Husband 3=Wife 4= Daughter 5=Son 6=Father 7=Mother 7 8=Other (Specify) I …………………….. Declare that the information above given by me is true and correct and I know this of my own knowledge. Signed by me ……………. …. On the …….day of ………. 2010 Representative LC! (In Witness): ………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………… Name Signature Date Representative Parish Land Committee ………………………………………….. …………………………………………………………………………………………… Name Signature Date 8