59224 Slovak Republic © 2010 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone 202-473-1000 Internet www.worldbank.org All rights reserved. 1 2 3 4 08 07 06 05 A copublication of The World Bank and the International Finance Corporation. This volume is a product of the staff of the World Bank Group. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone 978-750-8400; fax 978-750-4470; Internet www.copyright.com. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher,The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax 202-522-2422; e-mail pubrights@worldbank.org. Additional copies of Doing Business 2011: Making a Difference for Entrepreneurs, Doing Business 2010: Reforming through Difficult Times, Doing Business 2009, Doing Business 2008, Doing Business 2007: How to Reform, Doing Business in 2006: Creating Jobs, Doing Business in 2005: Removing Obstacles to Growth and Doing Business in 2004:Understanding Regulations may be purchased at www.doingbusiness.org. ISBN: 978-0-8213-7960-8 E-ISBN: 978-0-8213-8630-9 DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-7960-8 ISSN: 1729-2638 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication data has been applied for. Printed in the United States Current features News on the Doing Business project http://www.doingbusiness.org Rankings How economies rank-from 1 to 183 http://www.doingbusiness.org/rankings/ Contents Reformers Short summaries of DB2011 reforms, lists of reformers since DB2004 Introduction and a ranking simulation tool and Aggregate Rankings http://www.doingbusiness.org/reforms/ 5 - Year Measure of Historical data Cumulative Change Customized data sets since DB2004 http://www.doingbusiness.org/custom-query/ Starting a Business Methodology and research Dealing with The methodologies and research papers underlying Doing Business Construction Permits http://www.doingbusiness.org/Methodology/ Registering Property Download reports Access to Doing Business reports as well as subnational and regional Getting Credit reports, reform case studies and customized country and regional profiles Protecting Investors http://www.doingbusiness.org/reports/ Paying Taxes Subnational and regional projects Differences in business regulations at the subnational and regional Trading Across Borders level http://www.doingbusiness.org/subnational-reports/ Enforcing Contracts Law Library Closing a Business Online collection of business laws and regulations relating to business and gender issues Doing Business 2011 http://www.doingbusiness.org/law-library/ Business Reforms http://wbl.worldbank.org/ Local partners More than 8,200 specialists in 183 economies who participate in Doing Business http://www.doingbusiness.org/Local-Partners/Doing-Business/ Business Planet Interactive map on the ease of doing business http://rru.worldbank.org/businessplanet Doing Business 2011 : Making a Difference for Entrepreneurs is the eighth in a series of annual reports investigating regulations that enhance business activity and those that constrain it. Doing Business presents quantitative indicators on business regulations and the protection of property rights that can be compared across 183 economies, from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe, over time. A set of regulations affecting 9 stages of a business's life are measured: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, registering property, getting credit, protecting investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and closing a business. Data in Doing Business 2011 are current as of June 1, 2010*. The indicators are used to analyze economic outcomes and identify what reforms have worked, where, and why. The Doing Business methodology has limitations. Other areas important to business such as an economy 's proximity to large markets, the quality of its infrastructure services (other than those related to trading across borders), the security of property from theft and looting, the transparency of government procurement, macroeconomic conditions or the underlying strength of institutions, are not studied directly by Doing Business. To make the data comparable across economies, the indicators refer to a specific type of business, generally a local limited liability company operating in the largest business city. Because standard assumptions are used in the data collection, comparisons and benchmarks are valid across economies. The data not only highlight the extent of obstacles to doing business; they also help identify the source of those obstacles, supporting policymakers in designing reform. The data set covers 183 economies: 46 in Sub-Saharan Africa, 32 in Latin America and the Caribbean, 25 in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, 24 in East Asia and Pacific, 18 in the Middle East and North Africa and 8 in South Asia, as well as 30 OECD high-income economies. The following pages present the summary Doing Business indicators for Slovak Republic. The data used for this economy profile come from the Doing Business database and are summarized in graphs. These graphs allow a comparison of the economies in each region not only with one another but also with the "good practice" economy for each indicator. The good-practice economies are identified by their position in each indicator as well as their overall ranking and by their capacity to provide good examples of business regulation to other countries. These good -practice economies do not necessarily rank number 1 in the topic or indicator, but they are in the top 10. More information is available in the full report. Doing Business 2011 : Making a Difference for Entrepreneurs presents the indicators, analyzes their relationship with economic outcomes and recommends reforms. The data, along with information on ordering the report, are available on the Doing Business website (www.doingbusiness.org). * Except for the Paying Taxes indicator that refers to the period January to December of 2009. Note: 2008-2010 Doing Business data and rankings have been recalculated to reflect changes to the methodology and the addition of new economies (in the case of the rankings). 1 Economy Rankings - Ease of Doing Business Slovak Republic is ranked 41 out of 183 economies. Singapore is the top ranked economy in the Ease of Doing Business. Slovak Republic - Compared to global good practice economy as well as selected economies: Slovak Republic's ranking in Doing Business 2011 Rank Doing Business 2011 Ease of Doing Business 41 Starting a Business 68 Dealing with Construction Permits 56 Registering Property 9 Getting Credit 15 Protecting Investors 109 Paying Taxes 122 Trading Across Borders 102 Enforcing Contracts 71 Closing a Business 33 2 Summary of Indicators - Slovak Republic Starting a Business Procedures (number) 6 Time (days) 16 Cost (% of income per capita) 1.9 Min. capital (% of income per capita) 22.2 Dealing with Construction Permits Procedures (number) 13 Time (days) 287 Cost (% of income per capita) 12.7 Registering Property Procedures (number) 3 Time (days) 17 Cost (% of property value) 0.0 Getting Credit Strength of legal rights index (0-10) 9 Depth of credit information index (0-6) 4 Public registry coverage (% of adults) 2.2 Private bureau coverage (% of adults) 44.5 Protecting Investors Extent of disclosure index (0-10) 3 Extent of director liability index (0-10) 4 Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) 7 Strength of investor protection index (0-10) 4.7 Paying Taxes Payments (number per year) 31 Time (hours per year) 257 Profit tax (%) 7.0 Labor tax and contributions (%) 39.6 Other taxes (%) 2.1 Total tax rate (% profit) 48.7 Trading Across Borders Documents to export (number) 6 Time to export (days) 17 Cost to export (US$ per container) 1530 Documents to import (number) 8 Time to import (days) 19 Cost to import (US$ per container) 1505 3 Enforcing Contracts Procedures (number) 31 Time (days) 565 Cost (% of claim) 30.0 Closing a Business Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) 55.3 Time (years) 4.0 Cost (% of estate) 18 The 5 year measure of cumulative change illustrates how the business regulatory environment has changed in 174 economies from Doing Business 2006 to Doing Business 2011. Instead of highlighting which countries currently have the most business friendly environment, this new approach shows the extent to which an economy's regulatory environment for business has changed compared with 5 years ago. This snapshot reflects all cumulative changes in an economy's business regulation as measured by the Doing Business indicators-such as a reduction in the time to start a business thanks to a one-stop shop or an increase in the strength of investor protection index thanks to new stock exchange rules that tighten disclosure requirements for related -party transactions. This figure shows the distribution of cumulative change across the 9 indicators and time between Doing Business 2006 and Doing Business 2011 0.20 0.16 Doing business has 0.12 become easier (DB change 0.08 score) 0.04 Doing 0.00 business has become more difficult or more -0.04 Albania Czech Slovak Serbia Hungary Italy costly Republic Republic 6 1. Benchmarking Starting a Business Regulations: Slovak Republic is ranked 68 overall for Starting a Business. Ranking of Slovak Republic in Starting a Business - Compared to good practice and selected economies: 7 The following table shows Starting a Business data for Slovak Republic compared to good practice and comparator economies: Good Practice Procedures Time (days) Cost (% of Min. capital (number) income per (% of income Economies capita) per capita) Denmark* 0.0 New Zealand* 1 1 0.0 Selected Economy Slovak Republic 6 16 1.9 22.2 Comparator Economies Albania 5 5 16.8 0.0 Czech Republic 9 20 9.3 30.9 Hungary 4 4 8.2 10.2 Italy 6 6 18.5 10.1 Serbia 7 13 7.9 6.0 * The following economies are also good practice economies for : Procedures (number): Canada Cost (% of income per capita): Slovenia 8 2. Historical data: Starting a Business in Slovak Republic Starting a Business data Doing Business Doing Business Doing Business Doing Business 2008 2009 2010 2011 Rank .. .. 64 68 Procedures (number) 9 6 6 6 Time (days) 25 16 16 16 Cost (% of income per capita) 4.2 3.3 2.0 1.9 Min. capital (% of income per capita) 34.1 30.4 23.8 22.2 3. The following graphs illustrate the Starting a Business sub indicators in Slovak Republic over the past 4 years: 9 Starting a Business Summary - Slovak Republic This table summarizes the procedures and costs associated with setting up a business in the Slovak Republic. STANDARDIZED COMPANY Legal Form: Spolocnost s Rucenim Obmedzenym (s.r.o.) City: Bratislava Registration Requirements: No: Procedure Time to complete Cost to complete 1 Check the uniqueness of the proposed company name 1 EUR 3 2 Notarize articles of association and related documents 1 EUR 12 3 Apply at the One stop shop for trade licenses, income tax registration 7 EUR 17 and health insurance company compagny 4 Open a bank account 1 EUR 17 5 Apply for registration 5 EUR 166 6 Register with pension, sickness, and disability insurance and 1 no charge unemployment insurance at the local social insurance company (Socialna poistovna) 10 Starting a Business Details - Slovak Republic Procedure 1 Check the uniqueness of the proposed company name Time to complete: 1 Cost to complete: EUR 3 Comment: There is an option to check the name on line without charge (100 SSK at the Commercial register maintained by the Commercial Court). Procedure 2 Notarize articles of association and related documents Time to complete: 1 Cost to complete: EUR 12 Comment: An amendment to the Commercial Code (effective February 1, 2004) canceled the requirement that a company of one shareholder be established by articles of association executed by notary deed. The only formal requirement is the verification of founders' signatures. Company establishment without professional help takes longer. Legal services fees starting from EUR 495. Procedure 3 Apply at the One stop shop for trade licenses, income tax registration and health insurance company compagny Time to complete: 7 Cost to complete: EUR 17 Comment: According to an amendment to the Trade License Act effective as of October 1, 2007, One-stop shop centres (centres of first contact) were introduced at the Trade Licensing Offices. The one application form contains application for trade licenses, for income tax registration and registration with the health insurance company. An individual, who is already registered in the system of mandatory health insurance submits with the application for trade license also the name of the insurance company, where he/she is registered. For nationals, it is only necessary to submit data required to obtain an extract from the criminal record. The Trade Licensing Office will apply for the extract from criminal record itself. According to the fee schedule dated as of October 1, 2007, the applicant has to pay a fee per license : Administrative fees are now 3.00 for a standard license; 16.50 for a trade or craft related business and 33.00 for a special license (concession) Procedure 4 Open a bank account Time to complete: 1 Cost to complete: EUR 17 Comment: The cost of opening a bank account varies from bank to bank but in average is EUR 16,5 . Minum shareholder´s capital to be paid is EUR 750, before registering the company at least 30% of each shareholder´s capital (30% of EUR 750) and a total of at least EUR 2500 must be paid Procedure 5 Apply for registration 11 Time to complete: 5 Cost to complete: EUR 166 Comment: Registration changed from a judicial to an administrative process, and court clerks became responsible for company registration. A special registration form is required to apply for registration at the County Registry Court. This form may be downloaded from the Slovak Commercial Register Web site (www.orsr.sk).The registration form can also be submitted by electronic means. The form must be signed by a secure electronic signature. In this case, the signature of the executives or the authorised person need not be certified. (There are transitional technical problems with getting electronic stignatures so the online system is not commonly used yet). 165,75 euro if the application is submitted electronically, 331,5 euro (hardcopy) The proposal for company registration must be signed by all executives, and their signatures must be certified. If the executive is represented by an authorized person, the signature must be certified in the power of attorney. The County Registry Court must enter changes to a Commercial Register entry, and add or delete an entry, within 5 working days of receiving the completed registration form and its supporting documents. The business identification number is assigned by the Trade Licensing Office. The Registry Court only assigns a business identification number if one is not assigned by the Trade Licensing Office, most commonly if the licenses for the company's commercial activities are issued by another state authority. Procedure 6 Register with pension, sickness, and disability insurance and unemployment insurance at the local social insurance company (Socialna poistovna) Time to complete: 1 Cost to complete: no charge Comment: For social security, the company must register itself as an employer within 8 days of its first employment contract becoming effective and must register all new employees with the Social Insurance Company before their first working day. The registration forms are available at the official Social Security Company Web site (www.socpoist.sk). The forms must be submitted electronically, by fax, or by SMS and supplemented by submitting a written official form in 3 days. If an company has more than 8 employees, monthly reports must be submitted electronically to the Social Security Company. 12 13 1. Benchmarking Dealing with Construction Permits Regulations: Slovak Republic is ranked 56 overall for Dealing with Construction Permits. Ranking of Slovak Republic in Dealing with Construction Permits - Compared to good practice and selected economies: 14 The following table shows Dealing with Construction Permits data for Slovak Republic compared to good practice and comparator economies: Good Practice Procedures Time (days) Cost (% of (number) income per Economies capita) Denmark 6 Qatar 0.8 Singapore 25 Selected Economy Slovak Republic 13 287 12.7 Comparator Economies Albania 24 331 381.3 Czech Republic 36 150 16.4 Hungary 31 189 9.8 Italy 14 257 142.3 Serbia 20 279 1821.4 15 2. Historical data: Dealing with Construction Permits in Slovak Republic Dealing with Construction Permits data Doing Business Doing Business Doing Business Doing Business 2008 2009 2010 2011 Rank .. .. 56 56 Procedures (number) 13 13 13 13 Time (days) 287 287 287 287 Cost (% of income per capita) 14.9 13.1 13.6 12.7 3. The following graphs illustrate the Dealing with Construction Permits sub indicators in Slovak Republic over the past 4 years: 16 Dealing with Construction Permits in Slovak Republic The table below summarizes the procedures, time, and costs to build a warehouse in the Slovak Republic. BUILDING A WAREHOUSE City: Bratislava Registration Requirements: No: Procedure Time to complete Cost to complete 1 Obtain certificate of ownership of the land 1 day EUR 8 2 Apply for a location permit from the Municipal Authority 150 days EUR 50 3 Obtain the construction permit from the Municipal Authority 80 days EUR 133 4 * Receive pre-construction, on-site inspection 1 day no charge 5 * Obtain consent from water and sewage provider and request water and 26 days EUR 332 sewage connection 6 * Obtain consent from electricity provider and request power connection 26 days EUR 332 7 * Obtain consent from telecommunications provider and request telephone 26 days EUR 204 connection 8 Receive inspection and connection from water and sewage provider 7 days no charge 17 9 * Receive inspection and connection from electricity provider 7 days no charge 10 * Receive inspection and connection from telecommunications provider 7 days no charge 11 Obtain an occupancy permit from the Municipal Authority 29 days EUR 100 12 * Receive on-site inspection from the Municipal authority 1 day no charge 13 Register the building with the Real Estate Registry 18 days EUR 266 * Takes place simultaneously with another procedure. 18 Dealing with Construction Permits Details - Slovak Republic Procedure 1 Obtain certificate of ownership of the land Time to complete: 1 day Cost to complete: EUR 8 Comment: The certificate of ownership must be recent, at most 3 months old. Procedure 2 Apply for a location permit from the Municipal Authority Time to complete: 150 days Cost to complete: EUR 50 Agency: Municipality Comment: Design and documentation should be submitted to the municipal authority and must show the dimensions and design of the building and the technical requirements for water, sewerage, and power. State and municipal authorities and companies involved include the public health department, fire department, labor inspection, environment department, water company, electricity provider, telecommunications provider. These organizations provide clearances and approvals. The location permit determines, as the name implies, the location of the building, as well as the requirements for the utility connections (telecommunications, power, sewerage, and roads, and so on). The agencies may conduct on-site inspections. Generally, these are conducted only when the documentation does not provide sufficient information for the agencies to issue the required clearances and approvals. Procedure 3 Obtain the construction permit from the Municipal Authority Time to complete: 80 days Cost to complete: EUR 133 Agency: Municipality Comment: The relevant construction office issues approval of the construction permit application. Detailed design and documentation should be submitted to the authority, with all authorized contractors providing the design related to their field (heating, electricity, and the like). The authority schedules a public hearing where all parties concerned can submit their objections. An on-site inspection is also set up. Statements to the design must be provided by people from all relevant organizations. The permit is valid for 2 years, during which time construction must begin. Procedure 4 Receive pre-construction, on-site inspection Time to complete: 1 day Cost to complete: no charge 19 Agency: Construction Authority Comment: The construction authority sets up an inspection date, and all interested parties and authorities are invited. This procedure is not mandatory but is common in practice. Procedure 5 Obtain consent from water and sewage provider and request water and sewage connection Time to complete: 26 days Cost to complete: EUR 332 Agency: Bratislava Water Company, Plc. (Bratislavská vodárenská spolocnos, a.s.) Comment: To apply for the construction permit, BuildCo needs the consent of utility providers on the delivery of these utilities, and agrees on the terms under which the facilities would be granted. When the consent is granted, terms are specified by the utility providers within 4 weeks. During construction, the utility providers are requested to also inspect the site at the stages specified in the terms. Inspection is usually carried out a week after it is requested. The utility providers can be asked at any time to run checks on the equipment they installed at the construction site, such as measurement devices, and they usually charge a fee of up to SKK 10,000 to grant their consent and specify their terms, depending on the complexity of the construction. Afterwards, no additional setup fees are charged. Any costs would be reflected in the monthly payments for the delivery of utilities. Procedure 6 Obtain consent from electricity provider and request power connection Time to complete: 26 days Cost to complete: EUR 332 Agency: Holding Slovenske elektrarne d.o.o. Comment: To apply for the construction permit, BuildCo needs the consent of utility providers on the delivery of these utilities, and agrees on the terms under which the facilities would be granted. When the consent is granted, terms are specified by the utility providers within 4 weeks. During construction, the utility providers are requested to also inspect the site at the stages specified in the terms. Inspection is usually carried out a week after it is requested. The utility providers can be asked at any time to run checks on the equipment they installed at the construction site, such as measurement devices, and they usually charge a fee of up to SKK 10,000 to grant their consent and specify their terms, depending on the complexity of the construction. Afterwards, no additional setup fees are charged. Any costs would be reflected in the monthly payments for the delivery of utilities. Procedure 7 Obtain consent from telecommunications provider and request telephone connection Time to complete: 26 days Cost to complete: EUR 204 Agency: Slovak Telekom 20 Comment: To apply for the construction permit, BuildCo needs the consent of utility providers on the delivery of these utilities, and agrees on the terms under which the facilities would be granted. When the consent is granted, and terms are specified by the utility providers within 4 weeks. During construction, the utility providers are requested to also inspect the site at the stages specified in the terms. Inspection is usually carried out a week after it is requested. The utility providers can be asked at any time to run checks on the equipment they installed at the construction site, such as measurement devices, and they usually charge a fee of up to SKK 6,150 to grant their consent and specify their terms, depending on the complexity of the construction. Afterwards, no additional setup fees are charged. Any costs would be reflected in the monthly payments for the delivery of utilities. Procedure 8 Receive inspection and connection from water and sewage provider Time to complete: 7 days Cost to complete: no charge Agency: Bratislava Water Company, Plc. (Bratislavská vodárenská spolocnos, a.s.) Comment: Procedure 9 Receive inspection and connection from electricity provider Time to complete: 7 days Cost to complete: no charge Agency: Holding Slovenske elektrarne d.o.o. Comment: Procedure 10 Receive inspection and connection from telecommunications provider Time to complete: 7 days Cost to complete: no charge Agency: Slovak Telekom Comment: Procedure 11 Obtain an occupancy permit from the Municipal Authority Time to complete: 29 days Cost to complete: EUR 100 Agency: Municipality 21 Comment: The premises on which a construction approval is based can be fully operational only upon issuance of an occupancy permit. In the approval proceedings, the construction office examines whether the building was erected in compliance with the documentation approved by the construction office in the construction proceedings and whether the terms determined in the land-use decision and the construction permit have been complied with. An on-site inspection and a hearing involving the parties concerned are always carried out before the occupancy permit is granted. There is no time limit for the authority to start the proceedings related to the occupancy permit. However, the builder may file the request for the proceedings in advance, indicating the contemplated final completion date, so that the authority is able to start the proceedings without undue delay after the completion of construction. The authority notifies the involved parties of the hearing and of the on-site inspection 10 days in advance. Procedure 12 Receive on-site inspection from the Municipal authority Time to complete: 1 day Cost to complete: no charge Agency: Municipality Comment: Procedure 13 Register the building with the Real Estate Registry Time to complete: 18 days Cost to complete: EUR 266 Agency: Real Estate Registry Comment: The cost of registering a building under the standard procedure (31 days) is SKK 2,000. Expedited processing, possible for a higher fee, is assumed here. Delays should be expected in regions with busy construction activity, as around Bratislava. 22 23 1. Benchmarking Registering Property Regulations: Slovak Republic is ranked 9 overall for Registering Property. Ranking of Slovak Republic in Registering Property - Compared to good practice and selected economies: 24 The following table shows Registering Property data for Slovak Republic compared to good practice and comparator economies: Good Practice Procedures Time (days) Cost (% of (number) property Economies value) New Zealand* 2 Norway* 1 Saudi Arabia 0.0 Selected Economy Slovak Republic 3 17 0.0 Comparator Economies Albania 6 42 3.4 Czech Republic 4 43 3.0 Hungary 4 17 5.0 Italy 8 27 4.5 Serbia 6 91 2.7 * The following economies are also good practice economies for : Procedures (number): United Arab Emirates Time (days): Saudi Arabia, Thailand, United Arab Emirates 25 2. Historical data: Registering Property in Slovak Republic Registering Property data Doing Business Doing Business Doing Business Doing Business 2008 2009 2010 2011 Rank .. .. 9 9 Procedures (number) 3 3 3 3 Time (days) 17 17 17 17 Cost (% of property value) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 3. The following graphs illustrate the Registering Property sub indicators in Slovak Republic over the past 4 years: 26 Registering Property in Slovak Republic This topic examines the steps, time, and cost involved in registering property in the Slovak Republic. STANDARDIZED PROPERTY Property Value: 562,510.78 City: Bratislava Registration Requirements: No: Procedure Time to complete Cost to complete 1 Each party obtains extracts from the commercial 1 day 13 EUR (2 extracts at 6,50 register held by the respective court EUR each) 2 Confirm the signature authenticity of the seller before 1 day 1 EUR (2 signatures at 0,50 applying for registration EUR at registrar´s office; 3,98 EUR (2 signatures at 1,99 EUR each) at notary office 3 Submit the application for registration of the transfer 30 days (standard 66 EUR (standard (the proposal for entry into the cadastre) with the procedure) or 15 days procedure) or 265.50 EUR competent district land registry (fast procedure) (fast procedure) 27 Registering Property Details - Slovak Republic Procedure 1 Each party obtains extracts from the commercial register held by the respective court Time to complete: 1 day Cost to complete: 13 EUR (2 extracts at 6,50 EUR each) Agency: Commercial Register Comment: Parties obtain extracts from the commercial register held by the respective court, for each party. Procedure 2 Confirm the signature authenticity of the seller before applying for registration Time to complete: 1 day Cost to complete: 1 EUR (2 signatures at 0,50 EUR at registrar´s office; 3,98 EUR (2 signatures at 1,99 EUR each) at notary office Agency: Notary or Registrar´s office Comment: In order to file an application to register the transfer of an ownership right (the proposal for the entry) into the cadastre, it is necessary to submit the transfer contract with a counterpart for each party, plus two additional ones (although the respective law has not yet been amended accordingly, due to the abolishment of a real estate transfer tax, it is sufficient to submit two additional counterparts of the contract instead of three). Under the conditions stated for this case study, it would be necessary to submit four counterparts of the contract. Assuming there will be only one executive manager acting on behalf of each party (company), a notary public would have to notarize 4 signatures (signatures of the person acting on behalf of the seller). It is common to keep at least one copy of the contract for each party in addition, so that the parties have always at least one copy with their files (e.g. if the contracts filed with the cadastre get lost or the obliged party fails to file the application for a registration of the ownership right with the cadastre). The notary fee is 1,50 EUR per signature. Verified signatures can also be obtained at the registrar´s office for a fee of 0,50 EUR per signature. The official currency in Slovakia from 1st of January 2009 is Euro, therefore all costs for all procedures have been changed from SKK to EUR. Procedure 3 Submit the application for registration of the transfer (the proposal for entry into the cadastre) with the competent district land registry Time to complete: 30 days (standard procedure) or 15 days (fast procedure) Cost to complete: 66 EUR (standard procedure) or 265.50 EUR (fast procedure) Agency: Cadastral registry Comment: Attorneys at law and notaries public are entitled to authorise property transfer contracts - they must examine identity of the parties, decide whether the contract is not against good morals or contrary to law and whether no damage can be suffered by such transfer, which could be claimable against the attorney or notary. Act no. 304/2009 Coll. then gives a detailed summary of requisites for the authorisation (authorisation stamp and items to be written in/on it etc.). The core advantage for the parties and for the cadastral office is that when the contract is authorised by attorney or by notary, 28 cadastral office examines only the data related to property identification and procedural conditions for the application. If the property identification data are compliant with those of the cadastral office and procedural requirements are met, cadastral office decides within 20 days from the application filing. As a conclusion, the term for the decision is thereby shortened by 10 days (from regular 30 days to 20 days). It is almost an equivalent time as the time when an accelerated procedure is used (15 days). 29 30 1. Benchmarking Getting Credit Regulations: Slovak Republic is ranked 15 overall for Getting Credit. Ranking of Slovak Republic in Getting Credit - Compared to good practice and selected economies: 31 The following table shows Getting Credit data for Slovak Republic compared to good practice and comparator economies: Good Practice Strength of Depth of Public Private legal rights credit registry bureau Economies index (0-10) information coverage (% coverage (% index (0-6) of adults) of adults) New Zealand* 100.0 Portugal 67.1 Singapore* 10 United Kingdom 6 Selected Economy Slovak Republic 9 4 2.2 44.5 Comparator Economies Albania 9 4 8.3 0.0 Czech Republic 6 5 4.9 73.2 Hungary 7 5 0.0 11.4 Italy 3 5 16.6 80.5 Serbia 8 5 0.0 100.0 * The following economies are also good practice economies for : Strength of legal rights index (0-10): Hong Kong, China, Kenya, Kyrgyz Republic, Malaysia Private bureau coverage (% of adults): Argentina, Australia, Canada, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States 27 countries have the highest credit information index. 32 2. Historical data: Getting Credit in Slovak Republic Getting Credit data Doing Business Doing Business Doing Business Doing Business 2008 2009 2010 2011 Rank .. .. 14 15 Strength of legal rights index (0-10) 9 9 9 9 Depth of credit information index (0-6) 4 4 4 4 Private bureau coverage (% of adults) 40.3 39.9 44.0 44.5 Public registry coverage (% of adults) 1.2 1.4 1.4 2.2 3. The following graphs illustrate the Getting Credit sub indicators in Slovak Republic over the past 4 years: 33 Getting Credit in Slovak Republic The following table summarize legal rights of borrowers and lenders, and the availability and legal framework of credit registries in the Slovak Republic. Getting Credit Indicators (2010) Indicator Private credit Public credit Private bureau coverage (% of adults) 4 bureau registry Are data on both firms and individuals distributed? No No 0 Are both positive and negative data distributed? Yes Yes 1 Does the registry distribute credit information from retailers, trade No No 0 creditors or utility companies as well as financial institutions? Are more than 2 years of historical credit information distributed? Yes No 1 Is data on all loans below 1% of income per capita distributed? Yes Yes 1 Is it guaranteed by law that borrowers can inspect their data in the Yes No 1 largest credit registry? Coverage 44.5 2.2 Number of individuals 2,000,000 0 Number of firms 0 98,545 34 Strength of legal rights index (0-10) 9 Can any business use movable assets as collateral while keeping possession of the assets; and any financial Yes institution accept such assets as collateral ? Does the law allow businesses to grant a non possessory security right in a single category of movable assets, Yes without requiring a specific description of collateral? Does the law allow businesses to grant a non possessory security right in substantially all of its assets, without Yes requiring a specific description of collateral? May a security right extend to future or after-acquired assets, and may it extend automatically to the products, Yes proceeds or replacements of the original assets ? Is a general description of debts and obligations permitted in collateral agreements, so that all types of obligations Yes and debts can be secured by stating a maximum amount rather than a specific amount between the parties ? Is a collateral registry in operation, that is unified geographically and by asset type, as well as indexed by the Yes grantor's name of a security right ? Do secured creditors have absolute priority to their collateral outside bankruptcy procedures? Yes Do secured creditors have absolute priority to their collateral in bankruptcy procedures? Yes During reorganization, are secured creditors' claims exempt from an automatic stay on enforcement? No Does the law authorize parties to agree on out of court enforcement? Yes 35 36 1. Benchmarking Protecting Investors Regulations: Slovak Republic is ranked 109 overall for Protecting Investors. Ranking of Slovak Republic in Protecting Investors - Compared to good practice and selected economies: 37 The following table shows Protecting Investors data for Slovak Republic compared to good practice and comparator economies: Good Practice Strength of investor Economies protection index (0-10) New Zealand 9.7 Selected Economy Slovak Republic 4.7 Comparator Economies Albania 7.3 Czech Republic 5.0 Hungary 4.3 Italy 5.7 Serbia 5.3 38 2. Historical data: Protecting Investors in Slovak Republic Protecting Investors data Doing Business Doing Business Doing Business Doing Business 2008 2009 2010 2011 Rank .. .. 108 109 Strength of investor protection index (0-10) 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 3. The following graph illustrates the Protecting Investors index in Slovak Republic compared to best practice and selected Economies: 9.7 7.3 5.7 5.3 5.0 4.7 4.3 y ia al ia nd ry rb It an ep vak ep ech ga a Se lic lic lb al un o z A Ze ub ub C Sl H ew R R N Note: The higher the score, the greater the investor protection. 39 Protecting Investors in Slovak Republic The table below provides a full breakdown of how the disclosure, director liability, and shareholder suits indexes are calculated in the Slovak Republic. Protecting Investors Data (2010) Indicator Extent of disclosure index (0-10) 3 0 What corporate body provides legally sufficient approval for the transaction? 1 Whether immediate disclosure of the transaction to the public and/or shareholders is required? 2 Whether disclosure of the transaction in published periodic filings (annual reports) is required? 0 Whether disclosure of the conflict of interest by Mr. James to the board of directors is required? 0 Whether an external body must review the terms of the transaction before it takes place? Extent of director liability index (0-10) 4 1 Whether shareholders can hold Mr. James liable for the damage that the Buyer-Seller transaction causes to the company? 1 Whether shareholders can hold the approving body (the CEO or board of directors) liable for the damage that the Buyer-Seller transaction causes to the company? 0 Whether a court can void the transaction upon a successful claim by a shareholder plaintiff? 1 Whether Mr. James pays damages for the harm caused to the company upon a successful claim by the shareholder plaintiff? 40 0 Whether Mr. James repays profits made from the transaction upon a successful claim by the shareholder plaintiff? 0 Whether fines and imprisonment can be applied against Mr. James? 1 Whether shareholders can sue directly or derivatively for the damage that the Buyer-Seller transaction causes to the company? Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) 7 4 Whether the plaintiff can obtain any documents from the defendant and witnesses during trial? 1 Whether the plaintiff can directly question the defendant and witnesses during trial? 1 Whether the plaintiff can request categories of documents from the defendant without identifying specific ones? 0 Whether shareholders owning 10% or less of Buyer's shares can request an inspector to investigate the transaction? 1 Whether the level of proof required for civil suits is lower than that of criminal cases? 0 Whether shareholders owning 10% or less of Buyer's shares can inspect transaction documents before filing suit? Strength of investor protection index (0-10) 4.7 41 42 1. Benchmarking Paying Taxes Regulations: Slovak Republic is ranked 122 overall for Paying Taxes. Ranking of Slovak Republic in Paying Taxes - Compared to good practice and selected economies: 43 The following table shows Paying Taxes data for Slovak Republic compared to good practice and comparator economies: Good Practice Payments Time (hours Total tax rate (number per per year) (% profit) Economies year) Maldives* 3 0 Timor-Leste 0.2 Selected Economy Slovak Republic 31 257 48.7 Comparator Economies Albania 44 360 40.6 Czech Republic 12 557 48.8 Hungary 14 277 53.3 Italy 15 285 68.6 Serbia 66 279 34.0 * The following economies are also good practice economies for : Payments (number per year): Qatar 44 2. Historical data: Paying Taxes in Slovak Republic Paying Taxes data Doing Business Doing Business Doing Business Doing Business 2008 2009 2010 2011 Rank .. .. 120 122 Total tax rate (% profit) 48.4 47.4 48.6 48.7 Payments (number per year) 31 31 31 31 Time (hours per year) 325 325 257 257 3. The following graphs illustrate the Paying Taxes sub indicators in Slovak Republic over the past 4 years: 45 Paying Taxes in Slovak Republic The table below addresses the taxes and mandatory contributions that a medium-size company must pay or withhold in a given year in Slovak Republic, as well as measures of administrative burden in paying taxes. Tax or mandatory Payments Notes on Time Statutory tax Tax Totaltax rate Notes on contribution (number) Payments (hours) rate base (% profit) TTR Value added tax (VAT) 12 114 19.0% value added Motor vehicle tax 1 various rates 0.20 Property tax 4 various rates property area 0.40 per square meter Tax on interest 0 withheld 19.0% interest 0.50 income Fuel tax 1 included in 1.60 fuel price Corporate income tax 1 43 19.0% taxable profit 7.00 Social security 12 100 35.2% gross salaries 39.60 contributions Totals 31 257 48.7 46 47 1. Benchmarking Trading Across Borders Regulations: Slovak Republic is ranked 102 overall for Trading Across Borders. Ranking of Slovak Republic in Trading Across Borders - Compared to good practice and selected economies: 48 The following table shows Trading Across Borders data for Slovak Republic compared to good practice and comparator economies: Good Practice Documents to Time to Cost to Documents to Time to Cost to export export (days) export (US$ import import (days) import (US$ Economies (number) per (number) per container) container) Denmark* 5 France 2 2 Malaysia 450 Singapore 4 439 Selected Economy Slovak Republic 6 17 1530 8 19 1505 Comparator Economies Albania 7 19 725 9 18 710 Czech Republic 4 17 1060 7 20 1165 Hungary 5 18 1225 7 17 1215 Italy 4 20 1245 4 18 1245 Serbia 6 12 1398 6 14 1559 * The following economies are also good practice economies for : Time to export (days): Estonia 49 2. Historical data: Trading Across Borders in Slovak Republic Trading Across Borders data Doing Business Doing Business Doing Business Doing Business 2008 2009 2010 2011 Rank .. .. 116 102 Cost to export (US$ per container) 1015 1445 1445 1530 Cost to import (US$ per container) 1050 1445 1445 1505 Documents to export (number) 6 6 6 6 Documents to import (number) 8 8 8 8 Time to export (days) 22 22 20 17 Time to import (days) 25 25 25 19 3. The following graphs illustrate the Trading Across Borders sub indicators in Slovak Republic over the past 4 years: 50 51 Trading Across Borders in Slovak Republic These tables list the procedures necessary to import and export a standardized cargo of goods in Slovak Republic. The documents required to export and import the goods are also shown. Nature of Export Procedures (2010) Duration (days) US$ Cost Documents preparation 7 290 Customs clearance and technical control 2 55 Ports and terminal handling 2 285 Inland transportation and handling 6 900 Totals 17 1530 Nature of Import Procedures (2010) Duration (days) US$ Cost Documents preparation 10 265 Customs clearance and technical control 2 55 Ports and terminal handling 2 285 Inland transportation and handling 5 900 Totals 19 1505 52 Documents for Export and Import Export Bill of lading Certificate of origin Commercial invoice Customs export declaration Inspection report Packing list Import Bill of lading Certificate of origin Commercial invoice Customs import declaration Customs transit document Packing list Technical standard/health certificate Terminal handling receipts 53 54 1. Benchmarking Enforcing Contracts Regulations: Slovak Republic is ranked 71 overall for Enforcing Contracts. Ranking of Slovak Republic in Enforcing Contracts - Compared to good practice and selected economies: 55 The following table shows Enforcing Contracts data for Slovak Republic compared to good practice and comparator economies: Good Practice Procedures Time (days) Cost (% of (number) claim) Economies Bhutan 0.1 Ireland 20 Singapore 150 Selected Economy Slovak Republic 31 565 30.0 Comparator Economies Albania 39 390 38.7 Czech Republic 27 611 33.0 Hungary 35 395 15.0 Italy 41 1210 29.9 Serbia 36 635 28.9 56 2. Historical data: Enforcing Contracts in Slovak Republic Enforcing Contracts data Doing Business Doing Business Doing Business Doing Business 2008 2009 2010 2011 Rank .. .. 70 71 Procedures (number) 31 31 31 31 Time (days) 565 565 565 565 Cost (% of claim) 25.7 25.7 30.0 30.0 3. The following graphs illustrate the Enforcing Contracts sub indicators in Slovak Republic over the past 4 years: 57 Enforcing Contracts in Slovak Republic This topic looks at the efficiency of contract enforcement in Slovak Republic. Nature of Procedure (2010) Indicator Procedures (number) 31 Time (days) 565 Filing and service 90.0 Trial and judgment 365.0 Enforcement of judgment 110.0 Cost (% of claim)* 30.00 Attorney cost (% of claim) 14.0 Court cost (% of claim) 6.0 Enforcement Cost (% of claim) 10.0 58 Court information: Bratislava District Court (I-V) ("Okresný súd Bratislava (I-V)") * Claim assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita. 59 60 1. Benchmarking Closing Business Regulations: Slovak Republic is ranked 33 overall for Closing a Business. Ranking of Slovak Republic in Closing Business - Compared to good practice and selected economies: 61 The following table shows Closing Business data for Slovak Republic compared to good practice and comparator economies: Good Practice Recovery rate Time (years) Cost (% of (cents on the estate) Economies dollar) Ireland 0.4 Japan 92.7 Singapore* 1 Selected Economy Slovak Republic 55.3 4.0 18 Comparator Economies Albania 0.0 no practice no practice Czech Republic 55.9 3.2 17 Hungary 37.9 2.0 15 Italy 58.0 1.8 22 Serbia 29.5 2.7 23 * The following economies are also good practice economies for : Cost (% of estate): Colombia, Kuwait, Norway 62 2. Historical data: Closing Business in Slovak Republic Closing a Business data Doing Business Doing Business Doing Business Doing Business 2008 2009 2010 2011 Rank .. .. 39 33 Time (years) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Cost (% of estate) 18 18 18 18 Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) 45.2 45.9 45.9 55.3 3. The following graphs illustrate the Closing Business sub indicators in Slovak Republic over the past 4 years: 63 Since 2004 Doing Business has been tracking reforms aimed at simplifying business regulations, strengthening property rights, opening access to credit and enforcing contracts by measuring their impact on 10 indicator sets . * Nearly 1,000 reforms have had an impact on these indicators. Doing Business 2011, covering June 2009 to June 2010, reports that 117 economies implemented 216 reforms to make it easier to start a business. 64% of economies measured by Doing Business have reformed this year, focusing on easing business start-up, lightening the tax burden, simplifying import and export regulations and improving credit information systems. The top 10 most-improved in Doing Business 2011 Dealing with Construction Trading Across Borders Positive Change Registering Property Enforcing Contracts Protecting Investors Starting a Business Closing a Business Negative Change Getting Credit Paying Taxes Permits Economy Kazakhstan Rwanda Peru Vietnam Cape Verde Tajikistan Zambia Hungary Grenada Brunei Darussalam * For Doing Business 2011 the Employing Workers indicator is not included in the aggregate ease of doing business ranking. 64 Summary of changes to business regulation in top 10 most improved economies in Doing Business 2011 and selected comparator economies. Albania Albania made it easier and less costly for companies to pay taxes by amending several laws, reducing social security contributions and introducing electronic filing and payment. Brunei Darussalam Brunei Darussalam made starting a business easier by improving efficiency at the company registrar and implementing an electronic system for name searches. Brunei Darussalam reduced the corporate income tax rate from 23.5% to 22% while also introducing a lower tax rate for small businesses, ranging from 5.5% to 11%. The introduction of an electronic customs system in Brunei Darussalam made trading easier. Cape Verde Cape Verde made start-up easier by eliminating the need for a municipal inspection before a business begins operations and computerizing the system for delivering the municipal license. Cape Verde eased property registration by switching from fees based on a percentage of the property value to lower fixed rates. Cape Verde abolished the stamp duties on sales and checks. Czech Republic The Czech Republic simplified its labor tax processes and reduced employer contribution rates for social security. The Czech Republic made it easier to deal with insolvency by introducing further legal amendments to restrict setoffs in insolvency cases and suspending for some insolvent debtors the obligation to file for bankruptcy. Grenada Grenada eased business start-up by transferring responsibility for the commercial registry from the courts to the civil administration. The appointment of a registrar focusing only on property cut the time needed to transfer property in Grenada by almost half. Grenada's customs administration made trading faster by simplifying procedures, reducing inspections, improving staff training and enhancing communication with users. Hungary Hungary implemented a time limit for the issuance of building permits. Hungary reduced the property registration fee by 6% of the property value. Hungary simplified taxes and tax bases. Amendments to Hungary's bankruptcy law encourage insolvent companies to consider reaching agreements with creditors out of court so as to avoid bankruptcy. Italy Italy made starting a business easier by enhancing an online registration system. Kazakhstan Kazakhstan eased business start-up by reducing the minimum capital requirement to 100 tenge ($0.70) and eliminating the need to have the memorandum of association and company charter notarized. Kazakhstan made dealing with construction permits easier by implementing a one-stop shop related to technical conditions for utilities. Kazakhstan strengthened investor protections by requiring greater corporate disclosure in company annual reports. Kazakhstan speeded up trade through efforts to modernize customs, including implementation of a risk management system and improvements in customs automation. Peru Peru eased business start-up by simplifying the requirements for operating licenses and creating an online one-stop shop for business registration. Peru streamlined construction permitting by implementing administrative reforms. Peru introduced fast-track procedures at the land registry, cutting by half the time needed to register property. Peru made trading easier by implementing a new web-based electronic data interchange system, risk-based inspections and payment deferrals. Rwanda Rwanda made dealing with construction permits easier by passing new building regulations at the end of April 2010 and implementing new time limits for the issuance of various permits. Rwanda enhanced access to credit by allowing borrowers the right to inspect their own credit report and mandating that loans of all sizes be reported to the central bank's public credit registry. Rwanda reduced the number of trade documents required and enhanced its joint border management procedures with Uganda and other neighbors, leading to an improvement in the trade logistics environment. Serbia Serbia passed a new bankruptcy law that introduced out-of-court workouts and a unified reorganization procedure. Tajikistan Tajikistan made starting a business easier by creating a one-stop shop that consolidates registration with the state and the tax authority. Tajikistan strengthened investor protections by requiring greater corporate disclosure in the annual report and greater access to corporate information for minority investors. Tajikistan lowered its corporate income tax rate. 65 Vietnam Vietnam eased company start-up by creating a one-stop shop that combines the processes for obtaining a business license and tax license and by eliminating the need for a seal for company licensing. Vietnam made dealing with construction permits easier by reducing the cost to register newly completed buildings by 50% and transferring the authority to register buildings from local authorities to the Department of National Resources and Environment. Vietnam improved its credit information system by allowing borrowers to examine their own credit report and correct errors. Zambia Zambia eased business start-up by eliminating the minimum capital requirement. Zambia eased trade by implementing a one-stop border post with Zimbabwe, launching web-based submission of customs declarations and introducing scanning machines at border posts. Zambia improved contract enforcement by introducing an electronic case management system in the courts that provides electronic referencing of cases, a database of laws, real-time court reporting and public access to court records. 66 67