DAM REHABILITATION AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (DRIP) II (Funded by World Bank) IMPHAL BARRAGE ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT February 2020 (Draft Report) Office of Chief Engineer Water Resources Department Government of Manipur Imphal - 795001 E-mail: drip.manipur@gmail.com CONTENTS Page No. CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1 1.2 SUB-PROJECT DESCRIPTION – IMPHAL BARRAGE 2 1.3 PURPOSE OF ESIA 7 1.4 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY OF ESIA 7 CHAPTER 2: LEGAL, REGULATORY AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK 2.1 APPLICABILITY ANALYSIS OF INDIAN REGULATION 8 2.2 APPLICABILITY ANALYSIS OF WB ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL FRAMEWORK 18 2.3 INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK 22 CHAPTER 3: OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL CONDITIONS 3.1 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 23 3.2 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT 26 3.3 PROTECTED AREA 27 3.4 SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT 28 3.5 CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT 29 CHAPTER 4: STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTATION 4.1 STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTATION 30 CHAPTER 5: ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL RISKS AND IMPACTS 5.1 ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF E&S RISK AND IMPACT (ESS 1) 32 5.2 LABOUR AND WORKING CONDITIONS (ESS 2) 32 5.3 RESOURCE EFFICIENCY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT (ESS 3) 34 5.4 COMMUNITY HEALTH AND SAFETY (ESS 4) 37 CHAPTER 6: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 6.1 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 39 6.2 MONITORING REPORTING AND BUDGETING 42 6.3 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL COMMITMENT PLAN (ESCP) AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS 43 List of Tables Table 2.1: Applicable Analysis 9 Table 2.2: Relevance and requirements ESF Policy, Standards and Directives 19 Table 3.1: Water Quality of Imphal River 25 List of Figures Figure 1.1: Selected Photographs of Improvement/Intervention area 5 Figure 1.2: Project Area showing major intervention locations 6 Figure 3.1: Land Use and Land Cover Map of 5 Km radius around Barrage 23 Figure 3.2: Map showing location of Protected Areas wrt Imphal Barrage 28 List of Annexures Annexure I: Ambient Air Quality Data (2019) 44-51 Annexure II: Socio-economic Profile of Proximity villages (Study Area) 52-58 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AIDS : Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome ASI : Archaeological Survey of India AWS : Automatic Weather Station BOCWW : Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare CCA : Culturable Command Area CPCB : Central Pollution Control Board CRZ : Coastal Regulation Zone CWC : Central Water Commission DEIAA : District Environment Impact Assessment Authority DRIP : Dam Rehabilitation and Improvement Project EAP : Emergency Action Plan ERP : Emergency Response Procedure ESCP : Environmental and Social Commitment Plan ESF : Environmental and Social Framework ESIA : Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESS : Environmental and Social Framework FI : Financial Intermediaries FSI : Forest Survey of India GBV : Gender Based Violence GCA : Gross Command Area GIS : Geographic Information System GRM : Grievance Redressal Mechanism HIV : Human Immunodeficiency Virus IPF : Investment Project Financing IS : Indian Standards JTU : Jackson Turbidity Unit LMP : Labour Management Procedure MCM : Million Cubic Meters MDDL : Minimum Draw Down Level MOEF&CC : Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change MPCB : Manipur Pollution Control Board MSDS : Material Safety Data Sheets MSIHC : Manufacture Storage & Imports of Hazardous Chemicals MWL : Maximum Water Level NAAQS : National Ambient Air Quality Standards NH : National Highway NTU : Nephelometric Turbidity Unit O&M : Operation & Maintenance OBC : Other Backward Class OHS : Occupational Health & Safety PA : Protected Area PESO : Petroleum and Explosives Safety Organization PMU : Project Management Unit PPE : Personal Protective Equipment PST : Project Screening Template PUC : Pollution Under Control PWD : Public Works Department RCC : Reinforced Cement Concrete SC : Scheduled Castes SCADA : Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition SEF : Stakeholder Engagement Framework SH : State Highway SHG : Self-Help Group SPCB : State Pollution Control Board SPMU : State Project Management Unit ST : Scheduled Tribes TMC : Thousand Million Cubic Feet WLS : Wildlife Sanctuary WRD : Water Resources Department Chapter INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW The proposed Dam Rehabilitation and Improvement Project (DRIP-2) would complement the suite of ongoing and pipeline operations supporting India’s dam safety program. The project would continue to finance structural improvements but would break with the prevailing build-neglect-rebuild approach by giving greater emphasis to establishing sustainable mechanisms for financing regular O&M and dam rehabilitation, enhancing State capabilities to manage these critical assets through institutional strengthening, and introducing risk- informed dam safety management. The project development objective (PDO) is to increase the safety of selected dams and to strengthen institutional capacity for dam safety in participating States. Project Components include: Component 1: Institutional Strengthening (US$ 40 million): This component supports further strengthening of dam safety management in the country through institutional modernization. A major focus of activities under this component will be increasing the oversight of dam safety by developing dam safety guidelines and by strengthening the capacity of various dam safety actors to carry out the regulatory functions defined in the proposed Dam Safety Bill, which has been passed by the Lok Sabha. Component 2: Risk-informed Asset Management and Sustainable Financing (US$ 25 million): This component supports identifying long-term funding needs for dam safety based on asset management and risk assessment financing for dam safety. This component would focus on: (i) improving the efficiency of public financing; (ii) generating alternative revenue streams Alternative revenue streams that could be developed include tourism and water recreational activities, fisheries, and other innovative schemes such as floating solar panels; and (iii) establishing financing arrangements for dam safety (e.g., dedicated budget lines). Component 3: Rehabilitation of Dams and Appurtenant Structures (US$ 200 million): This component supports improving the safety of dams through structural and non-structural interventions. Structural measures could include measures for seepage reduction (e.g., grouting, geomembranes), hydrological and structural safety measures (e.g., additional spillways, fuse plugs), enhancing the reliability of operational facilities (e.g., gates), rehabilitating foundation deficiencies, strengthening dam concrete/embankment structures, and improving basic dam facilities (e.g., access roads). Non-structural measures could include standardized dam safety instrumentation, monitoring, assessment and reporting protocols for dam health; flood forecasting and early warning systems; integrated reservoir operations including streamflow forecasting for climate resilient dam management; preparation and implementation of EAPs; preparation and implementation of sediment management plans; and revised operational rule curves to account for climate change. Component 4: Project Management (US$ 15 million): This component will ensure effective 1 implementation of project activities and monitoring and evaluating project implementation progress, outputs and outcomes. The component will support: (i) establishment of the Central Project Management Unit (CPMU), which will oversee and coordinate activities of the implementing agencies of the project, supported by a Engineering and Management Consultant (EMC), which is currently being procured; (ii) establishment and operations of State level Project Management Units (SPMUs) within State implementing agencies, which can hire experts in various fields as and when needed on a contractual basis; (iii) setting up of a monitoring and evaluation system; and (iv) establishment of a Quality Assurance and Quality Control system. This component will also finance consultancies, as well as related material, office equipment and incremental operating costs. The project will provide investment and technical support for the establishment of a Management Information System and Information and Communication Technology systems. 1.2 SUB-PROJECT DESCRIPTION – IMPHAL BARRAGE The construction of Imphal Barrage & Cross Regulator across Imphal river was completed in the year 1984. The barrage is located at Oinam Sawombung of Imphal West district in the southern part of Manipur and is at a distance of 17 km from Imphal city. The barrage supplies Irrigation water to a Gross Command Area of 6000 ha; Culturable Command Area is 4000 ha. In addition, there is a link channel (Turel Ahanbi) about 6 Km long leading water to a cross regulator which provides irrigation to a command area of 800 ha. Salient features of the project area as reported below: Project Imphal Barrage & Cross Regulator at Terel Ahanbi Project River Imphal River Lat/Long 240 41' 02''/ 930 54' 35'' GCA 6000 ha CCA 4000 ha Catchment Area 1704 sq km Main Barrage Type Concrete Length 55.40 m Top elevation 784 m Height of barrage above deepest 14.50 m foundation level Deepest foundation level 769.50 m Spillway Type Gated barrage Length 55.40 m Location of spillway Central Crest level 772 m Number of bays 5 Size of spillway gate 9 m width and 6 m height Discharge capacity at HFL 2272.19 cumec Reservoir Maximum water level 782.20 m Full Reservoir Level 778 m MDDL 772 m Live storage NA Gross storage NA Reservoir spread area NA Seismic zone V Year of start of construction 1975 2 Date of completion 1984 View of the Barrage View of the Cross Regulator Proposed Interventions/ Activities at Imphal Barrage The following rehabilitation proposals have been formulated and same are described in PST. Present ESIA report has been prepared for these proposals/interventions: Structural Rehabilitation Works Civil Work including Paint 1. Repairing of hoisting shed at Imphal Barrage 2. Construction of Upstream & Downstream stone pitching on both side of river banks, Retaining Wall, De-siltation of Imphal Barrage and protection walls on both sides Downstream of Cross-Regulator. 3. Embankment of river bund in upstream of Imphal barrage Electro-mechanical Work 4. Repairing and Replacement of all Main Gates including hoisting arrangement and Providing of STOP-LOG for Imphal Barrage and Cross Regulator 5. Repairing/Replacement of sluice Gate for outlet of Left main canal and Right main canal Basic Facilities Enhancement: 6. Construction of Inspection Bungalow, 3nos. Type I Quarters (two at Imphal Main Barrage and one at Cross Regulator), 2nos. Type II Quarters at Imphal Main Barrage and 6 nos. Septic tank of 20 users (one for each Quarter) 7. Construction of Site Office, 2nos. Control Rooms, 1nos. Septic Tank for 50 users and 2 nos. Septic Tanks for 20 users, Store Room, Parking at Imphal Barrage. 8. Construction for Security Barrack, 2nos. Watch Towers and Septic Tank for 50 users at Imphal Barrage 9. Construction of Compound Wall of Site Office, Quarters etc. of Imphal Barrage. 10. Providing and erection of lighting arrangement at Barrage Site and supply of DG set for back up 11. Improvement of approach road and storm water drains at Imphal Barrage. 12. Tree Plantation in and around the Imphal Barrage Instrumentation, SCADA, Surveillance system, etc Supply and installation of Geodetic equipment (ETS, GNSS, digital levels), Geotechnical 3 equipment (Piezometer, tilt meters), Seismic equipment, Hydro meteorological equipment, Surveillance system, Gate Positioning Sensors and software and Command and Control Room Hardware/Software and Network Communication of Imphal Barrage. Figures 1.1 and 1.2 provide photographs of key infrastructure proposed for rehabilitation works and also major interventions locations. Implementation Schedule Timelines for implementing above proposals has been proposed as 60 months. Malfunctioning of Gates Imphal Barrage Siltation at intake to left canal Erosion and siltation at the downstream left side Erosion and siltation at the downstream right side 4 Tilted and Jammed of Cross Regulator Gate Damaged wooden platform for Cross regulator hoisting Damage Cross regulator Hoisting Distress approach road above the cross regulator Distress 2nd Stage concreting for gate groove of Cross Regulator Figure 1.1: Selected Photographs of Improvement/Intervention area 5 Figure 1.2: Project Area showing major intervention locations 6 1.3 PURPOSE OF ESIA The overall project (DRIP II) was categorized as High Risk as per the internal Environment and Social Risk Classification of the Bank. Hence, a separate agency was contracted to conduct the Environment and Social Impact Assessment to use it as a tool for decision- making on the sub-project. Specifically, the objectives of the ESIA are: i. To identify, evaluate and manage the environment and social risks and impacts of the project in a manner consistent with the ESSs; ii. To adopt a mitigation hierarchy approach to the project’s E&S risks i.e. a) anticipate and avoid risks and impacts; b) minimize or reduce risks and impacts to acceptable levels, if not avoidable; c) once risks and impacts have been minimized or reduced, mitigate; and (d) where significant residual impacts remain, compensate for or offset them, where technically and financially feasible; iii. To help identify differentiated impacts on the disadvantaged or vulnerable and to identify differentiated measures to mitigate such impacts, wherever applicable; iv. To assess the relevance and applicability of environmental and social institutions, systems, laws, regulations and procedures in the assessment, development and implementation of projects, whenever appropriate; identify gaps, if any exist, and v. To assess borrower’s existing capacity, gaps therein, and identify areas for enhanced capacity towards management of E&S risks. 1.4 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY OF ESIA The following approach has been adopted for ESIA: i. Study sub-project information, proposed interventions, their magnitude and locations and carry out assessment of each proposed intervention to identify the magnitude of E&S risk and impacts; ii. Conduct site visit to understand baseline environment and social settings, proposed activities under the sub-project, their location and sensitivity, if any. iii. Conduct stakeholder consultations to help identify potential stakeholders; to provide information on the proposed interventions; to identify issues and concerns; and finally ascertain appropriate mechanisms for continued engagement iv. Prepare baseline data essential for impact assessment in immediate vicinity area of proposed interventions from secondary sources, such as land-use, protected areas in vicinity, habitation, access roads, ascertain presence of indigenous (schedule tribe)/vulnerable people, etc. v. Review relevance and applicability of national and state legal requirements and Bank’s ESF policy, standards and directives and preliminary assessment of impacts as per ESS framework (2-8), suggest mitigation measures in accordance with the requirements of each applicable standard vi. Undertake institutional assessment to identify existing capacities & relevant gaps to manage E&S risks and impacts All formats used for collection of the above information, checklists used for consultations and photographs towards preparation of the Draft ESIA report are available in the project files. 7 Chapter LEGAL, REGULATORY, AND 2 INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK India has well defined environmental and social regulatory framework. The regulation applicability depends on nature of work and location of work. Broadly legislation can be divided into four categories viz environmental, social, wildlife protection, and forests conservation. The applicability of environmental laws to dam are mostly at setting up new dams compared to rehabilitation stage. The applicability analysis of regulations pertaining to all the above four categories is carried out and summarized at section 2.1. Central Water Commission, Ministry of Jal Shakti, Government of India has also prepared “Operational Procedures for Assessing and Managing Environmental Impacts in Existing Dam Projects� as a guiding document for the dam owners to systematically address in advance the environmental safeguard requirements and have discussed in detail all applicable legal requirement. Reference has been drawn from this document as well while carrying out applicability analysis. The World Bank ESF comprises 10 ESSs (ESS1 to ESS10) and 2 Directives. The applicability of each standard to the proposed rehabilitation proposals and standard specific requirements is analysed and presented at Section 2.2. 2.1 APPLICABILITY ANALYSIS OF INDIAN REGULATION The regulatory applicability analysis to the proposed rehabilitation work has been carried out considering nature of improvements, methodology of construction/improvement, material requirement, sourcing and transportation mode, and waste generation. The regulatory applicability analysis is summarised at Table 2.1 below. 8 Table 2.1: Applicability analysis S. No. Legislation Purpose Applicability Reason Type of permit/specific Administrative action and stage of Authority applicability 1 Environment Protection To protect and improve overall Yes Applicable to all None MoEF&CC Act/Rules-1986 environment activities in general 2 The Forest (Conservation) To help conserve the country's No No diversion of None Forest Department Act, 1980 and amendments forests. It strictly restricts and forest land and The Forest regulates the de-reservation of involved (conservation) Rules 1981 forests or use of forest land for non- and amendments forest purposes without the prior approval of the Government. To this end the Act lays down the pre- requisites for the diversion of forest land for non-forest purposes 3 Coastal Regulation Zone To regulate development activities No Project is not None SCZMA, (CRZ) notification 2011 and within the 500 m of high tide line in located in coastal amendment till date coastal zone and 100 m of tidal area influence rivers. 4 Air (Prevention and Control An Act to prevent and control Air Yes Air pollution from Consent to establish and SPCB of Pollution) Act, 1981, pollution proposed operate by contractor for 1987 activities operation of Dg sets and During any other air pollution construction stage system like ready mix plant etc. 5 Water Prevention and An Act to prevent and control water Yes Water pollution Consent to establish and SPCB Control of Pollution) Act, pollution. from proposed operate by contractor for 1974, 1988 activities during setting up construction construction stage camp/labour camp 6 Noise Pollution (Regulation Ambient Noise Standards for Yes Noise emission None CPCB & SPCB and Control Act) 2000 and different areas and zones from proposed amendment till date activities during construction stage like operation of DG sets 7 Hazardous & Other Waste Protection to general public against Yes Hazardous waste Authorisation for handling SPCB (Management and Trans- improper handling storage and generation from of hazardous wastes disposal of hazardous wastes. The proposed 9 S. No. Legislation Purpose Applicability Reason Type of permit/specific Administrative action and stage of Authority applicability boundary Movement) rules prescribe the management activities like Rules, 2016 requirement of hazardous wastes generation of from its generation to final disposal. paints waste, used oil/waste oil 8 Manufacture Storage, & Usage and storage of hazardous Yes Painting is Arrange MSDS and store Chief Inspector of imports of Hazardous substances proposed which quantity of hazardous Factories Chemicals (MSIHC) Rules, will require use of chemicals below threshold 1989 as amended till date solvents/thinners quantity which will falls under hazardous chemicals category 9 The Batteries (Management To regulate the disposal and recycling No Batteries will not None SPCB and Handling) Rules 2001 of lead acid batteries be used for proposed activities 10 Construction and To manage the demolition and Yes Construction and Contractor needs to submit Local bodies of the Demolition Waste construction waste and prevent demolition waste plan for reuse or safe area Management Rules , 2016 environmental degradation will be generated disposal from proposed activities 11 Solid Waste Management To manage solid waste or semi-solid Yes Solid Waste will Contractor needs to submit Local bodies of the Rules, 2016 domestic waste, sanitary waste, be generated plants for its safe area from proposed disposal/burial activities due to influx of labour 12 Motor Vehicle Act 1988 and To minimize the road accidents, Yes Transportation of None Motor Vehicle amendment till date penalizing the guilty, provision of manpower and Department compensation to victim and family material (Licensing authority, and check vehicular air and noise registration pollution. authority &State Transport Authorities) 13 The Gas Cylinder Rules 2016 To regulate the storage of gas / Yes gas cylinders will None PESO possession of gas cylinder more than be used during the exempted quantity. welding and other electromechanical work. Storage 10 S. No. Legislation Purpose Applicability Reason Type of permit/specific Administrative action and stage of Authority applicability within threshold quantity and as per capability analysis. Handling with define safe practices 14 Ancient Monuments and Conservation of cultural and Yes Presence of None Archaeological Archaeological Sites and historical remains found in India. historical sites of Dept. Gol Remains Act, 1958 archaeological importance 15 Building and Other To regulate the employment and Yes Involvement of None Labour Construction Workers conditions of service of buildings and workforce/labour Commissioner (Regulation of Employment other construction workers and to and Conditions of Service) provide for their safety, health and Act, 1996 welfare measures and for other matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. 16 Plastic waste management To manage the plastic waste Yes Plastic waste None Local bodies of the Rules, 2016 generated so as it does not affect the generation from area water pipeline, animals and other proposed environmental components activities. Safe disposal as per Rules 17 E-Waste Management Protection of environment against Yes E-waste None CPCB &SPCB Rules, 2016 improper handling storage and generation from disposal of hazardous waste. replacement of instrumentation. Safe disposal as per rules 18 The Right to Fair Regulates land acquisition and lays No Land Acquisition is None Revenue Compensation and down the procedure and rules for not involved Department/District Transparency in Land granting compensation, Administration Acquisition, Rehabilitation rehabilitation and resettlement to and Resettlement Act, the affected persons 2013 19 Rights of Persons with Ensures that the Persons with Yes Persons with None Disabilities Act, 2016 Disability (PWD) enjoy the right to disability 11 S. No. Legislation Purpose Applicability Reason Type of permit/specific Administrative action and stage of Authority applicability equality, life with dignity, and respect for his or her own integrity equally with others. 20 Right To Information Act, Mandates timely response to citizen Yes Borrower is None Any Government 2005 requests for government information government Department organization 22 Scheduled Tribes and Other To recognize and vest the forest No No such activities The Gram Sabha resolution Ministry of Tribal Traditional Forest Dwellers rights and occupation in forest land are proposed for determining the nature Affairs (Recognition of Forest in forest dwelling STs and other and extent of individual or Rights) Act, 2006 traditional forest dwellers who are community forests rights residing in such forests for generations but whose rights could not be recorded. Its objective is to facilitate the overall development and welfare of the tribal people by empowering them socially, economically, politically without any impact on their culture, habitation and tradition and in terms of their age old rights and privileges. 24 Major Labour Laws Applicable To Establishments Engaged In Building And Other Construction Work 1 Employees Compensation The Act provides for compensation in Yes Contractor/Labour None Commissioner for Act 1923 case of injury, disease or death arising engagement Workmen’s out of and during the course of Compensation employment. 2 Payment of Gratuity Act Gratuity is payable to an employee Yes Contractor/Labour None Chief Labour 1972 under the Act on satisfaction of engagement Commissioner certain conditions on separation if an employee has completed 5 years’ service or more or on death at the rate of 15 days wages for every completed year of service. The Act is applicable to all establishments employing 10 or more employees. 12 S. No. Legislation Purpose Applicability Reason Type of permit/specific Administrative action and stage of Authority applicability 3 Employees P.F. and The Act provides for monthly Yes Contractor/Labour None Ministry of Labour Miscellaneous Provision Act contribution by the employer plus engagement 1952 (since amended) workers @ 10% or 8.33%. The benefits payable under the Act are: 4 Maternity Benefit Act 1961 The Act provides for leave and some Yes Contractor/Labour None Chief Labour other benefits to women employees engagement Commissioner in case of confinement or miscarriage etc. 5 Sexual Harassment of This Act defines sexual harassment in Yes Contractor/Labour None District Officer Women at the Workplace the workplace, provides for an engagement (District Magistrate (Prevention, Prohibition and enquiry procedure in case of or Additional Redressal) Act, 2013 complaints and mandates the setting District Magistrate up of an Internal Complaints or the Collector or Committee or a Local Complaints Deputy Collector) Committee 6 Contract Labour (Regulation The Act provides for certain welfare Yes Contractor/Labour None Chief labour & Abolition) Act 1970 measures to be provided by the engagement Commissioner Contractor to contract labour and in case the Contractor fails to provide, the same are required to be provided, by the Principal Employer by law. The Principal Employer is required to take Certificate of Registration and the Contractor is required to take license from the designated Officer. The Act is applicable to the establishments or Contractor of Principal Employer if they employ 20 or more contract labour. 7 Minimum Wages Act 1948 The Employer is supposed to pay not Yes Contractor/Labour None Chief labour less than the Minimum Wages fixed engagement Commissioner by appropriate Government as per provisions of the Act if the employment is a scheduled employment. Construction of Buildings, Roads, Runways are scheduled employments. 13 S. No. Legislation Purpose Applicability Reason Type of permit/specific Administrative action and stage of Authority applicability 8 Payment of Wages Act 1936 It lays down the mode, manner and by Yes Contractor/Labour None Chief labour what date the wages are to be paid, engagement Commissioner what deductions can be made from the wages of the workers. 9 Equal Remuneration Act The Act provides for payment of equal Yes Contractor/Labour None Chief labour 1976 wages for work of equal nature to engagement Commissioner male and female workers and for not making discrimination against Female employees in the matters of transfers, training and promotions etc. 10 Payment of Bonus Act 1965 The Act is applicable to all Yes Contractor/Labour Chief labour establishments employing 20 or more engagement Commissioner employees. Some of the State Governments have reduced this requirement from 20 to 10. The Act provides for payments of annual bonus subject to a minimum of 8.33% of the wages drawn in the relevant year. It applies to skilled or unskilled manual, supervisory, managerial, administrative, technical or clerical work for hire or reward to employees who draw a salary of Rs. 10,000/- per month or less. To be eligible for bonus, the employee should have worked in the establishment for not less than 30 working days in the relevant year. The Act does not apply to certain establishments. 11 Industrial Disputes Act 1947 the Act lays down the machinery and Yes Contractor/Labour None Ministry of Labour procedure for resolution of Industrial engagement and Employment disputes, in what situations, a strike or lock-out becomes illegal and what are the requirements for laying off or retrenching the employees or closing down the establishment. 12 Trade Unions Act 1926 The Act lays down the procedure for Yes Contractor/Labour None Ministry of Labour registration of trade unions of engagement and Employment 14 S. No. Legislation Purpose Applicability Reason Type of permit/specific Administrative action and stage of Authority applicability workmen and employers. The Trade Unions registered under the Act have been given certain immunities from civil and criminal liabilities. 13 Child Labour (Prohibition & The Act prohibits employment of Yes Contractor/Labour None Chief labour Regulation) Act 1986 children below 14 years of age in engagement Commissioner certain occupations and processes and provides for regulation of employment of children in all other occupations and processes. Employment of Child Labour is prohibited in the Building and Construction Industry. 14 Inter-State Migrant The Act is applicable to an Yes Contractor/Labour None Chief labour workmen’s (Regulation of establishment which employs 5 or engagement Commissioner Employment & Conditions more inter-state migrant workmen of Service) Act 1979 through an intermediary (who has recruited workmen in one state for employment in the establishment situated in another state). The Inter- State migrant workmen, in an establishment to which this Act becomes applicable, are required to be provided certain facilities such as housing, medical aid, traveling expenses from home up to the establishment and back, etc. 15 The Building and Other All the establishments who carry on Yes Contractor/Labour None Chief labour Construction Workers any building or other construction engagement Commissioner (Regulation of Employment work and employ 10 or more workers and Conditions of Service) are covered under these Acts. All such Act 1996 and the Building establishments are required to pay and Other Construction cess at the rate not exceeding 2% of Workers Welfare Cess Act, the cost of construction as may be 1996 (BOCWW Cess Act) notified by the Government. The Employer of the establishment is required to provide safety measures at the building or construction work 15 S. No. Legislation Purpose Applicability Reason Type of permit/specific Administrative action and stage of Authority applicability and other welfare measures, such as Canteens, First – Aid facilities, Ambulance, Housing accommodations for workers near the work place etc. The Employer to whom the Act applies has to obtain a registration certificate from the Registering Officer appointed by the Government. 16 Factories Act 1948 the Act lays down the procedure for Yes Contractor/Labour None Chief Inspector of approval of plans before setting up a engagement Factories factory engaged in manufacturing processes, health and safety provisions, welfare provisions, working hours, annual earned leave and rendering information regarding accidents or dangerous occurrences to designated authorities. It is applicable to premises employing 10 persons or more with aid of power or 20 or more persons without the aid of power. 17 Bonded Labour System The Act provides for the abolition of Yes Contractor/Labour None Chief labour (Abolition) Act, 1976 bonded labour system with a view to engagement Commissioner preventing the economic and physical exploitation of weaker sections of society. Bonded labour covers all forms of forced labour, including that arising out of a loan, debt or advance. 18 Employer’s Liability Act, This Act protects workmen who bring Yes Contractor/Labour None Chief labour 1938 suits for damages against employers engagement Commissioner in case of injuries endured in the course of employment. Such injuries could be on account of negligence on the part of the employer or persons employed by them in maintenance of all machinery, equipment etc. in healthy and sound condition. 16 S. No. Legislation Purpose Applicability Reason Type of permit/specific Administrative action and stage of Authority applicability 19 Employees State Insurance The Act provides for certain benefits Yes Contractor/Labour None Chief labour Act 1948 to insured employees and their engagement Commissioner families in case of sickness, maternity and disablement arising out of an employment injury. The Act applies to all employees in factories (as defined) or establishments which may be so notified by the appropriate Government. The Act provides for the setting up of an Employees’ State Insurance Fund, which is to be administered by the Employees State Insurance Corporation. Contributions to the Fund are paid by the employer and the employee at rates as prescribed by the Central Government. The Act also provides for benefits to dependents of insured persons in case of death as a result of an employment injury. 20 The Personal Injuries This Act provides for the employer’s Yes Contractor/Labour None Chief labour (Compensation Insurance) liability and responsibility to pay engagement Commissioner Act, 1963 compensation to employees where workmen sustain personal injuries in the course of employment. 21 Industrial Employment It is applicable to all establishments Yes Contractor/Labour None Chief labour (Standing Order) Act 1946 employing 100 or more workmen engagement Commissioner (employment size reduced by some of the States and Central Government to 50). The Act provides for laying down rules governing the conditions of employment by the Employer on matters provided in the Act and get the same certified by the designated Authority. 17 2.2 APPLICABILITY ANALYSIS OF WB ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL FRAMEWORK STANDARDS The World Bank Environmental and Social Framework comprises Policy, 10 standards and 2 Directives. The applicability of these standard vary depending on nature of activities. This applicability analysis is presented at Table 2.2 below. Table 2.2: Relevance and requirements ESF Policy, Standards and Directives ESF Policy, Standards Applicable Activities Applicability / Requirements and Directives & Guidelines ESS1: Assessment and All projects, sub-projects and associated facilities Applicable Management of (a) Conduct an environmental and social assessment of the proposed project, Environmental and including stake- holder engagement; Social Risks and (b) Undertake stakeholder engagement and disclose appropriate information in Impacts accordance with ESS10; (c) Develop an ESCP, and implement all measures and actions set out in the legal agreement including the ESCP; and (d) Conduct monitoring and reporting on the environmental and social performance of the project against the ESSs ESS2: Labour and Engagement of labour for various civil, paint and Applicable Working Conditions electro-mechanical or any other activities as part of a) Preparation of Labour Management Procedures applicable to the project. rehabilitation proposal. It applies to project workers b) Preparation of Grievance Mechanism and sharing with all the workers including full- time, part-time, temporary, seasonal c) Design and Implement OHS measures and migrant workers. It covers working conditions, protecting workforce, Grievance Mechanism and Occupational Health and Safety (OHS). ESS3: Resource Resource consumption and pollution generation from Applicable Efficiency, Pollution proposed activities (civil, electromechanical and paint a) To assess the resource requirement and implement technically and financially Prevention and work). This includes both hazardous and non- feasible measures for improving efficient consumption of energy, water and raw Management hazardous chemical pollutants in the solid, liquid, or materials, as well as other resources. gaseous phases b) Preparation of Resource Efficiency and Pollution Prevention Plan to assess and minimize/control the concentration of release of pollutants to air, water and land due to routine, non-routine, and accidental circumstances, and with the potential for local, regional, and transboundary impacts. ESS 4: Community Applies to potential risks and impacts on Applicable Health and Safety communities that may be affected by project a) Pollution from project activities and labour colony and increased traffic causing activities such as transportation of material to pollution and road safety risks on village roads during transportation of project site through village roads, labour colony material. housing migrant workers near the project site, 18 ESF Policy, Standards Applicable Activities Applicability / Requirements and Directives & Guidelines pollution generation from civil and electro- b) Preparation of Emergency Response Procedure (ERP) to prevent injuries to mechanical work. health and safety of the community during an emergency event arising from both natural and man-made hazards, typically in the form of fire, explosions, leaks or spills, flooding, etc. ESS 5: Land Acquisition, Applies to permanent or temporary physical and Not Applicable Restrictions on Land economic displacement resulting from land Proposed interventions are limited to the existing dam and will take place on the use and Involuntary acquisition or restrictions on land use undertaken or existing dam structure and within its premises. Any of the proposed Resettlement imposed in connection with project implementation. activities/interventions, does not involve acquisition of private land and/or private assets. These activities in no way cause restriction on access to land or use of resources by local communities and there is no economic displacement envisaged due to the sub-project. ESS 6: Biodiversity Applies to all projects that potentially affect Not Applicable Conservation and biodiversity or habitats, either positively or The present interventions do not involve any tree cutting or impacting any forest Sustainable negatively, directly or indirectly, or that depend upon area in any way. Activities remain limited to the barrage area only. Impacts on Management of Living biodiversity for their success. wildlife including that on fish fauna in the river are negligible due the nature and Natural resources location of activities proposed under this sub-project. There is no national park/wildlife sanctuary/Conservation Reserve within 10 Km of the project. No direct or indirect impacts on biodiversity are envisaged due to proposed interventions. ESS 7: Indigenous Applies to traditional communities or schedule Not Applicable Peoples/Sub-Saharan tribes, if they are present or have collective The project interventions do not directly or indirectly impact schedule tribe. African Historically attachment to a proposed project area, as Underserved Tradition determined during the environmental and social Local Communities assessment. This ESS applies regardless of whether such Communities are affected positively or negatively, and regardless of the significance of any such impacts. ESS 8: Cultural Heritage Applies to all projects that are likely to have Not Applicable risks/impacts on cultural heritage Project is not directly or indirectly impacting any cultural heritage as no such sites are in proximity to the project site. Access to temples/religious places in surrounding villages will not be blocked/hampered due to any of the proposed interventions as such activities are limited to barrage only. ESS 9: Financial Applies to Financial Intermediaries (FIs) that receive Not Applicable - Project does not have any FIs Intermediaries financial support from the Bank. FIs include public and private financial services providers, including national and regional development banks, which 19 ESF Policy, Standards Applicable Activities Applicability / Requirements and Directives & Guidelines channel financial resources to a range of economic activities across industry sectors. ESS 10: Stakeholder Applies to all projects supported by the Bank through Applicable for the barrage as a whole and in particular in relation to the non- Engagement and Investment Project Financing. The Borrower will structural interventions involving Early flood Warning system having siren systems, Information Disclosure engage with stakeholders as an integral part of the broadcasting facilities, etc. project’s environmental and social assessment and Preparation of Stakeholder Engagement Plan project design and implementation Establishment of a project level GRM Environmental and This Directive applies to the Bank and sets out the Applies to Bank in addressing E&S aspects of this project Social Directive for mandatory requirements for the implementation of Investment Project the Environmental and Social Policy for Investment Financing Project Financing (IPF). Bank Directive This Directive establishes directions for Bank staff Applies to Bank in addressing E&S risks and impacts on disadvantaged and Addressing Risks and regarding due diligence obligations relating to the vulnerable persons or groups that are identified in this project Impacts on identification of, and mitigation of risks and impacts Disadvantaged or on, individuals or groups who, because of their Vulnerable Individuals particular circumstances, may be disadvantaged or or Groups vulnerable World Bank’s Guidance The document provides guidelines to address Applicable as influx of skilled migrant labour in construction works is likely and note on managing the issues and risks arising from influx of migrant labour construction works on the bunds with population in the vicinity. risks of adverse leading to gender-based violence, forced labour etc. impacts on communities from temporary project induced labor influx, 2016 20 2.3 INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK The sub-project will be implemented by Water Resources Department (WRD), Manipur. The mandate of WRD is:  All matters relating to Medium and Major Irrigation Projects  All matters relating to Lift Irrigation Projects  All matters relating to management of floods, including construction of major dams and drainages  All matters relating to Management and Preservation of Water Resource  All matters relating to investigation of Ground Water Resources Fore implementation of the sub-project, SPMU has been set up to be headed by Chief Engineer (Project) as Nodal Officer. Project Director (SE Irrigation Circle No. II) and 3 Asstt. Project Directors (Executive Engineers) will report to him. In addition, technical, finance and safeguard sections have been created under Project Director for implementation of the project. Safeguard section will appoint Environment and Social Expert to enable preparation of management plans as well subsequent implementation of mitigation measures during implementation. They will hire experts from outside department or seek deputation of staff with relevant experience. Presently, no formal system is established for dealing with external complaints. 21 Chapter OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND 3 SOCIAL CONDITIONS The baseline conditions are analysed based on secondary information and site observations and are presented in following order Physical, Biological, Protected area and Socio- economic profile. 3.1 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Land Use/ Land Cover The project surrounding area’s land use and environmental sensitivity was analysed using GIS techniques. Land use/ land cover map of 5 Km radius area around the barrage is presented at Figure 3.1. As can be seen from the map, present land use around the barrage is largely agricultural land, followed by Built-up area due to proximity of the barrage to Imphal town. There is very little forest area in 5 Km radius around the barrage. Figure 3.1: Land Use and Land Cover Map of 5 Km radius around Barrage 22 The barrage is also used as a roadway to connect village Oinam Samurou to Lilong area. There are Petty shops, residences around the barrage. A temporary structure of cultural activity is within in the vicinity abutting the road on the left bank side. Both on the upstream and downstream side of the barrage banks, land is used for kitchen gardens during dry season. Kitchen Garden on Left Bank Ambient Air Quality and Noise Ambient air quality is regularly monitored by Manipur Pollution Control Board (MPCB) at their office location located in Imphal, which is about 15 Km away from the Imphal Barrage. As it falls in the same airshed and local conditions are similar, it is expected that Imphal Barrage and surrounding area will follow the same pattern of air pollution. Data for the period January to December 2019 has been provided by MPCB. Every month 8 set of readings were taken as per norms i.e. twice a week (non-consecutive days) for four weeks. Parameters monitored are PM10, NO2 and SO2. NO2 and SO2 values for all the samples for the entire year were well within the limits prescribed by CPCB for industrial residential rural and other areas i.e. not to exceed 80 µg/m3 for each parameter. On the other hand, PM10 is found to exceed the prescribed limit of 100 µg/m3 for most part of the year except for monsoon months of July-October. In August all values of PM10 are well within the limits, whereas for July, Sept and October, most of the values were found to be within limits. This is due to the dust suppression during the monsoon. Data is enclosed as Annexure I. Site-specific data of sound levels at project site is not available. However, general observation is made during site visit that area is generally high on noise during the day due to presence of traffic on barrage road. Water Quality The Imphal River is the main river of the basin and it rises near Kangpokpi in Senapati district of Manipur and receives the Iril River from the south and the Thoubal River from the east. It also receives the Khuga River from the south-west and is known as Manipur River below its confluence. Suraj & Rajmani (2018), conduct Water Quality assessment of Imphal River. The water Samples were collected from five different sites i.e. 23 Khurai Shalanthong (Site I), Hapta Minuthong (Site II), Mahaballi (Site III), Singjamei Kshetri leikai (Site IV) and Ningomthong (Site V). The value of water temperature recorded between 16.5o C- 27.9o C, pH ranged between6.3-7.9, dissolved oxygen between 5.8-19.3 mg/l, Free CO2 between 0.5-7 mg/l, alkalinity ranged 10-84 mg/l, turbidity between 0-480 mg/l, total hardness between 32-52 mg/l, calcium between 8.46-16 mg/l, magnesium between 2.73-9.95 mg/l, sodium between 3.46-6.02 mg/l, potassium between 1-3.32 mg/l. The river water is contaminated in the city areas due to human activities and there is a need to monitor regularly to conserve the water system (Suraj & Rajmani, 2018). Table 3.1: Water Quality of Imphal River S. No. Parameters Site I Site II Site III Site IV Site V 1 Temperature (0C) 16.2-26.7 17-.7-27.8 17.2-27.9 17.5-26.6 17.7-27.8 2 pH 6.5-7.8 6.8-7.9 6.8-7.8 6.8-7.8 6.8-7.9 3 Free CO2 (mg/l) 1-6 1-7 1-4 0.5-4 1-4 4 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) 16.4-19.3 7.5-12.8 5.8-11.8 7.6-11.8 6.3-14.6 5 Alkalinity (mg/l) 11-73 11-73 10-78 10-72 10-76 6 Total Hardness (mg/l) 32-52 32-52 35-52 20-50 34-46 7 Calcium (mg/l) 9.6-12 9.6-12 10.2-11.2 8.8-12 9.6-12.6 8 Magnesium (mg/l) 5.4-9.6 5.4-9.6 5.07-9.95 2.73-9.27 5.66-8.88 9 Sodium (mg/l) 3.26-5.6 3.26-5.6 3.46-5.0 3.38-6 4.24-6.02 10 Potassium (mg/l) 1-2.6 1.86-3.32 1-3.2 1-2.24 1-2.62 11 Chloride (mg/l) Nil-7.10 Nil-8.52 Nil-7.10 Nil-22.72 Nil-19.58 Natural Hazards Potential of natural hazards such as flooding and earthquake is observed. Flooding in Imphal river can impact the habitation in and around the barrage on river banks. Barrage has not storage of water and therefore it will not cause any flooding of downstream areas. Project falls in earthquake zone V, i.e. the most active zone. Bureau of Indian Standards [IS 1893 (Part I):2002], has grouped the country into four seismic zones, viz. Zone II, III, IV and V. Zone II is the least active and Zone V is the most active. Being in Zone V, the most active zone, earthquakes of low to moderate intensity are recorded here regularly. The state of Manipur, has experienced dozens of large earthquakes; the biggest in recent times being the 1988 (magnitude 7.2) earthquake. Most earthquakes in western Manipur are shallow. But some, especially those recorded in the eastern parts and along and across the Myanmar border have greater depths. Other earthquakes in recent times include:  18 September 2005 (magnitude 5.7) - A moderate earthquake at Myanmar-Manipur border, caused isolated minor damage to property in some parts of Manipur.  4 September 2009 (magnitude 5.9) - A moderate earthquake at Myanmar-Manipur 24 border, felt widely in north-east India and in Bangladesh. No reported damage.  4 January 2016 (magnitude 6.7) - Imphal earthquake with epicentre in the Tamenglong district; about 30 km west of Imphal. At least eleven people were killed, 200 others were injured and numerous buildings were damaged. The quake was also strongly felt Bangladesh and eastern and north-eastern India Keeping in view the seismic activity on the region, Dam Safety review Panel has already recommended carrying out a site-specific design earthquake parameters study to ascertain the requirement of additional safety measures, if any. 3.2 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT Flora and Fauna The Imphal West District falls in the Category of Manipur valley region. Based on the ecological classification Champion and Seth (1968) the forests of Manipur have been classified into i) Tropical wet evergreen ii) Tropical moist deciduous iii) Sub-tropical broad leaved hill iv) Sub- tropical pine and v) Montane temperature forests (Singh,1971). The tropical moist and dry deciduous forests are characterized by seasonal leaf shedding and profuse flowering of the trees. Tree species like Albizia lebbeck, Bischofia javanica, Bombax ceiba, Dipterocarpus tuberculatus, Spondias pinnata, Tectona grandis and Tetrameles nudiflora etc. are common in this type of forest. The second storey is composed of Bauhinia purpurea, Canarium strictum, Cryptocarya amygdalina, Dalbergia sissoo, Melia dubia, Persia villlosa and Turpinia pomifera etc. The tropical evergreen and semi evergreen forests is composed of trees like Ailanthus integrifolia spp. Calcina, Anthocephalus chinensis, Artocarpus heterophyllus, Dipterocarpus tuberculatus, Elaeocarpus floribundus and Mesua ferrea. The middle storey which is almost obscure is comprised of Alstonia scholaris, Bischofia javanica, Michelia champaca, Phoebe goalparensis, Schima wallichii and Syzygium cumini etc. Sub-tropical mixed forests consist of species like Alnus nepalensis, Albizia chinensis, Betula alnoides, Artocarpus, Elaeocarpus, Magnolia, Michelia, Schima terminalia etc. The shrubby layer is often gregarious in the area. Bamboo thickets are also found everywhere in these forest as successional vegetation in jhum abandoned areas. The major components are Allophylus cobbe, Clerodendrum kaempferi and Desmodium spp.,Phlogacanthus sp. , Impatiens sp. , Mimosa sp. , etc., form dominant undergrowth. In open areas, Chromolaena, Eupatorium, Lantana and Mikania grow profusely. Avenue trees viz. Acacia melanoxylon and Parkia timoriana are commonly seen on the both side of roads in the valley. The dominant grasses and sedges in these areas are Arundinella bengalensis, Imperata cylindrica, Saccharum spp., Brachypodium sylvaticum, Cymbopogon khasianus, Carex speciosa, Cyperus rotundus etc. are seen. 25 Study area has a diverse assemblage of wild life harbouring many species of mammals, birds, reptiles & amphibian, fishes and insects. The main Carnivores are Leopard, Jungle cat, Jackal, Mongoose, Civet cat, Fox, etc. The main Herbivores are Sambar, Deer, Wild boar, Monkey, etc. Among the small Mammals, Langur, Porcupine, Pangolins are to be mentioned. Hoolock gibbon and Serrow are rare and endangered ones. Avian fauna is represented by Burmese peafowl, Moorhen, Blyth‟s tragopan, Mrs. Hume‟s bar-backed pheasant, Red Jungle fowl and 3 species of Hornbills viz. Great Indian Hornbill, Rufous-necked hornbill, Wreathed hornbill, etc. Proposed activities remain limited to barrage area and therefore no risk is envisaged on flora and fauna in the surrounding areas. Fish & Fisheries The comprehensive survey was carried out by Suresh et.al. (2005), the study revealed 125 species of fishes in Manipur state. Out of 125 fish species 53 species belonging to 31 genera and 15 families are reported from the river, streams and lakes of the study area. Cyprinidae is the predominant family with various major and minor carps along with cat fish. Some of the species in river area Amblypharyngodon mala, Barilius barila, Barilius dogarsinghi , Barilius vagra, Chela laubuca, Esomus danricus, Garra gotyla gotyla, Garra lamta, Garra lissorhynchus, Garra litanensis, Garra manipurensis, Garra nasuta, Garra rupecula, Neolisocheilus hexagonolepis, Osteobrama belangeri, Osteobrama cotio and Parluciosoma daniconius. None of the proposed activities under the sub-project will impact water quality of river and therefore, there is no risk/impact on fish fauna. 3.3 PROTECTED AREA Nearest Protected Area There is no protected area within 10 Km distance from the barrage. Nearest protected are is Keibul Lamjao National Park at a distance of 13.5 Km from the barrage. The location of protected areas in relation to barrage is shown below at Figure 3.2. 26 Figure 3.2: Map showing location of Protected Areas wrt Imphal Barrage 3.4 SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT Imphal barrage falls in district Imphal West, which is one of the four valley districts of Manipur and is situated in the central region of the state. The district has four sub-divisions. There are four Tehsil Headquarters in the district. The brief demographic characteristic of the district is given in the table below: No. of Households 1,10,672 Household Size 5 Total Population 5,17,992 Population (0-6 age) 61,875 Male 2,55,054 Boys (0-6 age) 31,747 Female 2,62,938 Girls (0-6 age) 30,128 Sex Ratio 1,031 Sex Ratio (0-6) 949 Population (SC) 16,530 Population (ST) 24,161 Male 8,308 Male 11,560 Female 8,222 Female 12,601 Literates 3,92,626 Literacy Rate 86.1 Male 2,05,985 Male 92.2 Female 1,86,641 Female 80.2 No. of Workers 2,13,387 Cultivators 37,107 (17.4%) Male 1,28,540 Agricultural Labours 12,870 (6.0%) Female 84,847 Household Industrial 19,918 (9.3%) Workers No. of Main Workers 1,66,009 Other Workers 1,43,492 (67.2%) No. of Marginal Workers 47,378 Source: Census of India, 2011 (District Handbook) Total population of the study area has been worked out as 1,93,459. The gender wise distribution of the above population is 94,451 (48.82%) male and 99,008 (51.18%) female. The overall sex ratio of the study area has been worked out to 1,048 females per 1,000 males. Total population of the study area is distributed into different social groups like Scheduled Caste (SC), Scheduled Tribe (ST) and General Category (including OBC). The share of these social groups’ population to the total population of the study area is 0.56%, 8.59% and 90.85% respectively. 27 In the study area, 82.30% of the population is literate in which male literates are 50.72% and that of females are 49.28%. The overall literacy rate in the study area has been worked out to 91.70%. The male literacy rate is 95.83% and female literacy rate is 87.80%, creating a gender gap in literacy rate of 8.03%. The economic classification of workers as per Census 2011 is saying that total number of workers in the study area is 76,628 which constitute 39.61% of the total population. Of the total workers, 60.64% are males and remaining 39.36% are females. In absolute term, total number of male workers is 46,465 and that of female is 30,163. The gender gap in work participation rate is 21.28%. Agriculture is the third most important source of livelihood in the study area next to ‘Household Industrial Workers’. Rice is the most important crop grown in the study area. Maize, potato, pulses, chillies, oil seeds, vegetables like cabbage, cauliflower, cucumbers, peas, beans, etc. are other important crops & vegetables produced in the area. ‘Household Industrial Workers’ who is part of the small scale establishments run as a household industry involving production & manufacturing of handloom and handicraft products which is the only important industry with regard to employment potential particularly females. Bed shits, phaneks, mosquito nets, bamboo baskets, mats, fishing nets, furniture, carpentry products, pottery articles etc. are some of the notable products manufacturing by the people of the area. ‘Other Workers’ which include those activities engaged as government servants, municipal employees, teachers, construction workers, entertainment artists, trade, commerce, business, transport, banking etc. Basic amenities like water supply for drinking and other uses is available with various sources such as Tap (Treated & Un-treated), Hand Pump, Tube wells etc. Electricity is available for domestic, agriculture, commercial & industrial uses in almost all over the study area. The study area having approach roads as Black Topped (Paved), Gravel and Footpath. Health & educational institutions are also available significantly. For recreational activities, there are some Stadiums operated by government authority, Auditorium/Community Hall made by government & private agencies. Data on population, occupation and amenities of vicinity villages haven been compiled from Census of India and is given at Annexure II. 3.5 CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT List of Monuments of National Importance in Manipur and list of State Protected monuments in Manipur have been reviewed. There are no protected monuments in the project vicinity. 28 Chapter 4 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION 4.1 STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTATION Stakeholder consultations were conducted as part of environmental and social impact assessments. The purpose was to: a. provide initial information to the communities on the proposed project interventions and particularly the non-structural interventions; b. help identify potential stakeholders who are involved at this stage and will be involved a later stage. c. ascertain if there are any legacy issues relating to displacement, resettlement, etc. d. elicit their responses in relation to key non-structural interventions such as early warning systems, emergency action plans e. identify mechanisms that would be deployed to engage with different stakeholders and particularly communities living downstream A stakeholder consultation meeting was conducted at barrage site on 02/02/2020 and later at WRD office on 03/02/2020. It was attended by permanent staff of the borrower (WRD) working at barrage, workers from nearby villages, locals, elected representatives and local welfare groups. Town planning department was also consulted on 03/02/2020 regarding alternate mobility during the barrage road closure for implementation of works. 1&2 – Consultations at the Imphal Barrage; 3 – Planning department, 4 – at WRD office 29 Following is the outcome of the stakeholder consultation meetings: 1. The barrage road is used by locals extensively on either side of the river to commute as well as transportation of construction material, equipment etc. Closure of the barrage road during the implementation will require them to travel an additional 4 kms. 2. The participants expressed that improvement of the barrage is essential as its present condition is very poor. They expressed no difficulty for additional distance travel during the implementation period. 3. The existing bund on the left upstream side gave away during the recent floods, which was repaired partially. The participants from the nearby localities requested for strengthening the bund by raising the height as well as width. As a busy local road abuts the bund, a bund retaining structure is required and requested that it is designed in such a way that it does not reduce the road width. 4. The river is receiving heavy inflows of late and is at spate frequently. The habitations on either side of the barrage, both upstream and downstream have requested for flood control measures including bund and repair of barrage to be taken up immediately. 5. The participants at site informed that the nearby residents practice ‘kitchen gardening’ on the slopes during the dry season. Such activity is not towards their livelihoods and is temporary. 6. When enquired about increased bund height and restriction to access to the river - the participants requested for providing access at intervals. They observed that strengthening the bund is the important intervention now as they feel that their residences may get flooded in case of heavy inflows to the river during monsoon. 7. In consultations with the local welfare body representation and elected council, they proposed that they will work with the local communities during and post construction period to ensure safety. They have also mentioned that the kitchen gardening on the slopes is increasing in the recent past, which, together with the locals, they propose to address suitably. 8. The participants have explained that the temporary religious structures near to the project site in no way will be affected by the bund work, gates and other maintenance works. 9. About 5000 to 8000 residents are residing in the localities around the project site, as per the participants. 10. The barrage site attracts a few visitors and petty shops are set up temporarily during the peak season. 11. The WRD team indicated the proposed labour camp site within the vacant area of the WRD site about 200-250 mts, on the left downstream side of the barrage. The present site condition is observed to be vacant. 12. The participants showed sporadic, informal fishing in the river. No formal arrangement of contract fishing is noticed. 13. The WRD office maintains RTI process through which the public is provided with requested information. The WRD will set up 3 levels of GRM for the project – at site, at WRD and at Govt of Manipur. Based on these findings relating to both structural and non-structural interventions, potential stakeholders were categorized as follows: Affected, Other interested stakeholders, and disadvantaged and vulnerable stakeholders 30 Affected parties: There are no affected persons who shall be directly or indirectly adversely affected by the proposed interventions Other interested stakeholders: In relation to structural interventions, these would be potential contractors, Project Management consultants, either regulatory bodies/institutional stakeholders such as Revenue, Environmental Authorities, etc. In relation to non-structural interventions, these would include: communities living downstream including farmers; village heads, community leaders; district administration; police, state disaster management authority, revenue department; electronic and print media, etc. These communities would be key stakeholders requiring to be involved in the preparation and implementation of EAP. Disadvantaged and vulnerable persons and groups: Illiterate persons, physically challenged, women and elderly would be key stakeholders – requiring special focus and outreach to ensure that they are well informed about the provisions of the EAP. Communities welcomed such interactions and indicated that they would prefer Dam authorities conduct one such face -to- face meeting once a month at a convenient location to inform of developments/interventions relevant to them. They welcomed other means of information such as advertisements in the local papers etc, but preferred to have face to face interactions at least once a month. 31 Chapter ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL 5 RISKS AND IMPACTS Based on the relevance of each Standard, as identified in the chapter on Legal, Regulatory and Institutional Framework, ensuing sections summarize the environmental and social risks and impacts likely due to the proposed interventions followed by the mitigation measures considered, for each relevant Standard. Table below, presents the Risk and impacts grouped in respect of the applicable ESS identified in chapter 3 earlier: Applicable ESS Risk and Impacts area assessed ESS1- Assessment and Management of The risks and Impacts are carried out as per Environmental and Social Risks and requirement of this standard Impacts ESS2- Labour and Working Conditions Types of Workers/labour and working conditions ESS3- Resource Efficiency, Pollution Impact on Physiography/land use/Geology/Soil Prevention and Management Impacts on water resources/Water Quality Impact on Air quality/Noise levels Impact due waste generation/disposal ESS4- Community Health and Safety Impacts on Community Health and safety 5.1 ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF E&S RISK AND IMPACT (ESS 1) Proposed intervention are categorised as civil, electromechanical and painting work requiring labour involvement for works and their stay at site for a period of about 5 years, use of resources such as water and power during construction, pollution generation from storage and handling of material, generation of waste, use of paints and other chemicals for construction activities, transportation of raw material, etc. In addition, labour intensive work always involves risks of accidents such as working at heights, working across river or on river banks, etc. As all the proposed structural interventions are within the barrage area, no adverse impacts are envisaged on communities including that on the disadvantaged or vulnerable people. On the contrary, all communities including disadvantaged and vulnerable persons and groups will indirectly benefit from these proposed interventions that shall enhance safety. However, in case of non-structural interventions relating to early flood warning systems having siren systems, broadcasting facilities and Emergency Action Plans, project will need to make extra efforts to reach out to the disadvantaged and vulnerable persons and groups to involve them in both preparation and implementation. 5.2 LABOUR AND WORKING CONDITIONS (ESS 2) Water Resources Department, Manipur shall contract agencies to undertake civil works, agencies/firms to support core-functions; primary suppliers of material/equipment and other implementation support partners, and these could be from anywhere in the country. Construction works will require labour force and associated goods and services. Based on the construction package sizes and the project implementation schedule, the peak 32 construction workforce/manpower has been estimated as about 10 skilled workers sourced by contractor and about 15 unskilled workers sourced locally. They are expected to stay on site for a period of 5 years. In addition, there will be floating population of suppliers, transporters of material and their labour who will keep on moving in and out of the site during the work period of 5 years. Labour camp will be set up at the WRD site office campus about 150 m from the barrage. Water supply and power are available. Contractor will set up temporary labour camp with sanitation facilities. Project shall comprise the following types of workers: 1. Direct workers: Direct workers will include the project managers and supervisors, who are employees of WRD. The estimated number of direct workers is not likely to exceed 30 as per existing institutional arrangements and practices of WRD. 2. Contracted workers: All the work force deployed by the Contractors will be deemed to be contracted workers. The Contractor(s) might further engage multiple subcontractors. All work force of all such sub-contractors will be also deemed to be contracted workers. These will also include Migrant workers as all the required labour will not be fully supplied locally for a number of reasons, such as worker unavailability and lack of technical skills and capacity. Migrant Workers: The migrant workers are that, who are employed for the Project but does not belong to the Project region and are not normally expected to return to their places of residence after work shift hours. The number of migrant workers in any contract package, would depend on decisions made by contractors, based on the locally available workforce and their skills for Project construction requirements. The migrant workers could be at all levels and include unskilled and semiskilled construction labour and could even comprise combination of male and women labour force. The migrant workers are either directly engaged by the contractor or through labour contractors, who supply the work force to as per the needs of the contractors. 3. Primary Supply Workers: No primary supplier or primary supply workers are anticipated as all goods and services essential to the core functions of the project shall be provided by the contractor – through a contract by Rajasthan WRD. 4. Community Workers: Community workers are envisaged under the Emergency Action Plans, who will be mostly volunteers for implementing parts of the EAP. Potential Labour risks: Following are the potential risks associated with workers/labours engaged in execution of planned intervention works. Impact/Risks on Community 1. Increased risk of spread of communicable diseases 2. Waste generation from labour colony can pollute drinking water sources of community Impacts/Risks for Workforce 3. Safety issues while at work like injuries/accidents/ fatalities leading to even death, while at work; 33 4. Short terms effects due to exposure to dust and noise levels, while at work 5. Long term effects on life due to exposure to chemical /hazardous wastes 6. Inadequate accommodation facilities at work force camps, including inadequate sanitation and health facilities 7. Non-payment of wages 8. Discrimination in Employment (e.g. abrupt termination of the employment, working conditions, wages or benefits etc.) 9. Sexual harassment at work 10. Security of women work force 11. Absence or inadequate or inaccessible emergency response system for rescue of labour/workforce in situations of natural calamities. 12. Health risks of labour relating to HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases In addition, other risks that would be applicable for all types of workers would be as follows: 1. Unclear terms and conditions of employment 2. Discrimination and denial of equal opportunity in hiring and promotions/incentives/training opportunities 3. Denial for workers’ rights to form worker’s organizations, etc. 4. Absence of a grievance mechanism for labour to seek redressal of their grievances/issues 5.3 RESOURCE EFFICIENCY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT (ESS 3) Impact on Physiography The present interventions involve only civil and electromechanical works to improve barrage safety. All the work will be carried out at one location i.e. at barrage, therefore, physiography will not change due to any of the proposed interventions. There will be no significant impact on physiography of the region due to the proposed interventions. Impact on Land/Geology All project components are proposed to happen within barrage with no land acquisition. Therefore, impact on land and geology will be limited to sourcing of construction material or disposal of construction waste related only. The civil works will require different construction materials such as earth, aggregate, boulders, and sand. The requirement of such material is not large and will be sourced from already operational and approved mines/quarries. Sekmai is the nearest approved quarry area, which is about 40 Km from the site. The construction waste generation is also likely to be minimal and will be either reused or disposal for land filling or levelling purposes. However, requisite mitigation measures will be taken to minimise impact further. The various ‘resource efficacy’ options during design include optimize usage of construction waste from repair activities and thereby reduce potential impact due to dumping etc., are considered to achieve minimum construction footprint. 34 Impact on Soil The land where construction activities will take place will be directly impacted due to excavation, removal of topsoil, temporary storage of excavated material, etc. Other repair sites will also impact soil due to repair and demolition works such as upstream and downstream stone pitching, embankment of river bund, desilting of barrage area, spillage during painting, operation of construction equipment and machinery and waste generation thereof, etc. There is also possibility of contamination of soil from leakage and spillage during handling and storage of fuels and chemicals. Muck Disposal: The activities that generate construction debris and/or spoil are excavation, removal of damaged material, other repair and renovation activities as discussed above. This being largely repair work, quantities have not been estimated and they are not expected to be significant to create disposal problem. Nevertheless, all the construction debris/muck generated needs to be disposed off in a planned manner to avoid adverse impacts on soil. Impacts on Water Resources The proposed intervention activities are not expected to impact water resources in any way as the proposed interventions are neither crossing, altering or disturbing drainages nor impacting ground water resource in any form. Use of resources such as water and power will be optimised before start of work through Resource Efficiency and Pollution Prevention Plan. Impacts on Water Quality Construction related impacts and risks for water quality include: a) accidental release of fuel or chemicals and contamination from poor waste practices can affect surface and groundwater b) contamination from construction machinery working near water bodies c) discharges and disturbance of soil and sediment that drain into surface waters d) construction of Upstream & Downstream stone pitching on both side of river banks e) Generation of sanitary wastes from camp site and construction sites finding way to water bodies Impact on Ambient Air Quality As discussed in baseline, ambient air quality in the area has high dust emissions reflected in higher values of PM10 particles mainly due to vehicular traffic over the barrage and around the barrage on Bund Road. Construction activities will give rise to dust emissions if not effectively managed and have the potential to increase the pollution near to the main construction sites due to dust generated from demolition, excavation, operation of construction equipment and machinery, increased movement of vehicles, onto the local road network. Earth works will result in exposed areas of soil which will potentially generate dust when it is windy, with dust potentially being generated when winds blow at all times of day or night, not just during active periods of construction. The level and distribution of dust emissions will vary according to the duration and location of activity, weather conditions, and the effectiveness of suppression measures. 35 Traffic on Bund Road Heavy vehicle Movement over Barrage Gaseous emission during construction will be from machinery, equipment and vehicles used for material transportation. The operation of vehicles and equipment will result in emissions of carbon monoxide, sulphur dioxide, and oxides of nitrogen. In particular, all commercial vehicle driven with diesel fuel is often used in India. The greatest impact on air quality due to emissions from vehicles and construction equipment will be in the areas immediately adjacent to work area and will affect the labour. Generally, additional vehicle movements generated during the construction phase will have the potential to influence local air quality at sensitive receptors located at close proximity to road where the levels already exceed. The impacts will therefore apply mostly to the habitation along the route to barrage. As the project is presently operational and the interventions are not going to alter the project operation in any manner, no operational phase impacts are envisaged on ambient air quality. Impact of Noise and Vibration Sources of noise will be the vehicles and equipment for construction at the project site. Due to construction activity in the area, noise levels will further increase during the period of construction, however, they will remain limited to the work area mainly where construction activity will progress. Additionally, noise levels will increase on approach roads due to increased traffic. Noise generation due to operation of construction machines and equipment will impact workers operating these machines and other who are working in the surrounding area. Such impacts can become significant if they are exposed to high noise for long hours continuously. Impact of Waste Generation Migratory population is expected to reside in the area during peak construction period. Proper sanitary and solid waste management facilities would be provided at the labour colonies. In the absence of proper solid waste management plan, there can be serious impacts of land and water pollution due to indiscriminate disposal. In addition, there will be odour issues and health impacts. There will be an influx of labourers and other service providers into the project area. Sewage and solid waste will be generated from the colonies. It is essential that from the planning stage, sewage management and solid waste disposal facilities should be conceptualized to maintain the health of the people and the 36 environment. Solid waste generated from the colonies during construction phase will be disposed off as per Solid Wastes Management Rules, 2016. As most of the proposed activities involve repair and renovation, it is expected that construction and demolition waste in the form of debris will be generated. This being largely repair work, quantities have not been estimated and they are not expected to be significant to create disposal problem. Nevertheless, all the construction debris/muck generated needs to be disposed off in a planned manner to avoid adverse impacts on soil/land. All such wastes will be handled in compliance with Construction and Demolition Waste Rules, 2016. Project interventions include substantial amount of electro-mechanical work such as Repairing and Replacement of all Main Gates including hoisting arrangement and Providing of STOP-LOG for Imphal Barrage and Cross Regulator; Repairing/Replacement of sluice Gate for outlet of Left main canal and Right main canal. These activities will generate significant amount of waste in terms of replaced parts, packaging material, empty containers, use and disposal of oil & grease, iron scrap, etc. There will be a mix of hazardous and non-hazardous wastes. It is important to have a plan ready for disposal of such wastes before start of the activity. All such waste will be transported to WRD’s stores about 19 kms from barrage and will be disposed off as per the approved department process of auction /salvage. Contractor is obliged to provide first-aid/basic medical facilities to labour at site especially during accident/emergency which is likely to generate bio-medical waste, although quantity is not expected to be significant, this needs to be managed to avoid indiscriminate dumping as impacts could be serious. WRD along with contractor will prepare project specific muck / debris/Solid Waste disposal plan and provide sufficient site for such disposals. 5.4 COMMUNITY HEALTH AND SAFETY (ESS 4) Heath safety and security risks and impacts on project affected communities especially on vulnerable people are not considered significant as communities are not directly involved or getting impacted. However, the project construction would involve engagement of labour, transportation and handling of material, civil construction and electromechanical works and such activities may impact the community and increase the risks. Engagement of labour for project work and their stay at site for about 5 years’ time, will increase the risks of crimes including gender based violence. Waste generation from labour colony if not handled properly, will pollute the water resources used by community for drinking leading to health impacts. Migratory workforce may be bringing in new and infectious diseases not known to area. Transportation of material will increase the traffic on village roads. Increased movement of traffic will impact the community by way of increased noise and air pollution. In addition, this will also increase the risk of accidents. 37 Similarly, civil construction and electromechanical works will lead to pollution generation in the form of air emissions and noise generation, which will remain local and are not expected to impact the community. Construction waste and electromechanical work waste, especially the hazardous waste if not disposed off properly have the potential of impacting the surrounding community. The road over barrage is used by community extensively for traveling and during the closure of the road due to work at site, there will be additional travel of 4 Km for the locals. The issue was discussed in the stakeholder consultation and all the locals present agreed to temporary closure of the road in view of the safety of the barrage. 38 Chapter ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL 6 MANAGEMENT PLAN As can be seen from the above discussion, the interventions proposed under Imphal Barrage sub-project are of the nature of civil and electromechanical work, besides instrumentations. In case of structural interventions, there is no additional land requirement – neither forest nor private, as all the interventions remain within the close proximity to barrage itself. Impacts/risks as assessed under ESIA study will remain limited to barrage area except for procurement and transportation of material, closure of barrage road during implementation of proposed activities and labour habitation in the area, which have the potential of impacting community around the barrage. 6.1 ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN E&S impacts/risks for this sub-project is Low risk, as identified in the previous chapter. These risks and impacts can be mitigated by appropriately implementing management measures. Based on the ESIA following plans/procedures have been identified to effectively mitigate the environment and social impacts and risks of the proposed interventions:  Labour Management Procedure including GRM The Procedure will set out the way in which project workers will be managed, in accordance with the requirements of national law and the bank’s ESS Standards and will address the way in which this ESS will apply to different categories of project workers. It covers the terms and conditions of employment, non-discrimination and equal opportunity, worker’s organization and welfare. Protecting the workforce, establishing minimum age for labour to prevent child labour will be defined in the procedure. The responsibility to manage any adverse impacts would be clearly reflected in the contractual obligations of the Contractor with appropriate mechanisms for addressing non-compliance. A grievance mechanism will be provided for all direct workers and contracted workers to raise workplace concerns and workers will be informed of the grievance mechanism at the time of recruitment along with the measures put in place to protect them against any reprisal for its use. Mechanism should be easily accessible to all project workers. It should be designed to address concerns promptly, using an understandable and transparent process that provides timely feedback to those concerned in a language they understand, without any retribution, and will operate in an independent and objective manner. The document shall be prepared by Manipur WRD with support from the E&S staff and shall be applicable for both the projects taken under DRIP 2 in the state. It shall be disclosed by WRD one month before mobilization of the Contractor.  OHS Measures Measures relating to occupational health and safety applies to the project as it involves engagement of workers. The OHS measures will take into account the General Environment 39 Health and Safety Guidelines and applicable legal requirements. The OHS measures will be designed and implemented to address: i. identification of potential hazards to project workers, particularly those that may be life threatening; ii. provision of preventive and protective measures, including modification, substitution, or elimination of hazardous conditions or substances; iii. training on occupational safety and health, and maintenance of training records iv. Provision of personal protective equipment without expense to the project workers. v. documentation and reporting of occupational accidents, diseases and incidents; vi. emergency prevention and preparedness and response arrangements to emergency situations; vii. remedies for adverse impacts such as occupational injuries, deaths, disability and disease viii. accident reporting and analysis procedure ix. system for regular review of OHS performance The document shall be prepared by Manipur WRD with support from the E&S staff and shall be applicable for both the projects taken under DRIP 2 in the state. It shall be disclosed by WRD one month before mobilization of the Contractor.  GBV Risk Mitigation Guidelines The proposed structural interventions are extremely localized in nature and will be carried out in areas of restricted access – as normally all dams are, but there will be activities on the bunds with population in the vicinity. These structural interventions will not result in any project interface with local communities, the overall GBV rating for this dam intervention as per the Risk Assessment Tool is low. Hence, in accordance with the overall GBV Risk Mitigation Framework for the project, guidelines will be developed commensurate to the low risk category to address Gender Based Violence Risk before invitation of bids. The Plan will provide a set of measures such as orientation to all categories of labour including department staff/dam site personnel and also communities in the vicinity of the construction areas such as the Bund Road. The document shall be prepared by Manipur WRD with support from the E&S Staff.  Resource Efficiency and Pollution Prevention Measures Keeping in view the risks and impacts of the proposed activities, WRD will prepare a set of measures to be implemented by the Contractors to ensure efficient use of resources and avoid/minimize the pollution from proposed interventions. The measures should address all possible impacts identified above, with respect to resource use and pollution generation from civil works and electromechanical work and also from labour camps and colonies. It should focus on reuse/recycling; energy efficiency such as solar lights and cookers for colony/community kitchen for workers, where possible. The project’s demand for major raw material such as boulders, aggregate and sand for construction will be sourced through pre-existing authorized quarries, with valid environment clearance. To mitigate air and noise pollution from transportation, material storage and handling and construction activities, following measures should be included:  To ensure trucks are loaded only up to permitted capacities to prevent high emission 40  The ensure trucks used for transportation of material is covered by tarpaulin and provided tail board, so that en-route spillage and generation of fugitive dust are prevented.  Vehicles in good condition with valid PUC (Pollution Under Control) certificate shall be deployed during construction  Regular sprinkling of the water will be done on construction sites for dust suppression.  Mobile DG sets shall be used for lighting only during construction phase and they should meet emission and noise standards as per guidelines/standards issued by CPCB.  All the construction workers and other staff, who get directly exposed to dust, should necessarily be provided with dust masks. Workers in high noise area, will be provided with ear muffs and their use will be monitored. Workers exposure (time duration) to high noise will also be controlled.  Minimize the use of noise producing equipment during night hours to avoid the disturbance to locals and wild animals of surrounding area. To mitigate the risk of wastewater from construction site and colony finding its way to fresh water source without treatment, the following measures should be included:  All toilets and wash areas in worker’s colony should have functional septic tanks and soak pit arrangements, of adequate capacity.  No discharge from oil/lube storage areas shall be directly discharged in to any open surface water channel/ streams.  Construction along the river bank/reservoir shall be done when surface water level is receded and clear construction area is available.  Storage of material and construction equipment should be kept away from the drainages to avoid any spillage and pollution of surface water. For solid and hazardous waste management, sites should be identified for disposal of construction waste, surplus excavated material, and other solid wastes; and appropriate permissions taken for dumping with restoration plan covering engineering and biological measures as appropriate. No dump site shall be located in forest area. WRD will share identified locations of muck or debris disposal sites with the contractor. The contractor will develop a muck and debris disposal plan after incorporating longitudinal and cross section references to assess volume or capacity of the disposal site and will submit muck/ debris disposal plan before commencement of the work at site. This action needs to be included in the Bid Document as one of the key requirements. WRD needs to prepare a plan to identify and quantify all the waste generated from electro- mechanical work include replaced parts with estimated quantities and categorisation as hazardous and non-hazardous waste. The plan should also identify the temporary secured and covered storage location till the time it is removed, contractors/vendors who will pick these parts/wastes; authorisation status of contractors for hazardous wastes. Measures should also cover cleanliness of the labour colony, provision of basic sold waste collection facilities and restrict dumping of solid waste on land or in water body. Contractor should provide bins for dumping of domestic waste from colony and ensure timely pick up and dumping at authorised location. 41 Plan should also address, the mechanism of timely information about the period of road closure to locals and display of signage to guide traffic to alternate route with the help of traffic police. The document shall be prepared by Manipur, WRD with support from the E&S Staff and shall be applicable for both the projects taken under DRIP 2 in the state. It shall be disclosed by WRD one month before mobilization of the Contractor.  Procedures for Stakeholder Engagement The Stakeholder Engagement Framework (SEF) will describe the timing, methods of engagement with stakeholders and range of information, distinguishing between project- affected parties and other interested parties, as well as the type of information to be sought from them. The procedures developed based on SEF will set out how stakeholders will be engaged throughout project preparation and implementation and describe the measures that will be used to remove obstacles to participation, and how the views of differently affected groups will be captured. Where applicable, the procedures will include differentiated measures to allow the effective participation of those identified as disadvantaged or vulnerable. The draft Framework will be prepared by CWC in discussion with Manipur WRD and will be disclosed. The Stakeholder Engagement Procedures will be developed specific to the proposed interventions at the site, prior to invitation of bids.  Institutional Arrangement As part of institutional strengthening for implementation of sub-projects, Environmental and Social staff will be engaged by the department to enable preparation of management plans as well subsequent implementation of mitigation measures during implementation. IA will hire experts from outside department or seek deputation of staff with relevant experience.  Grievance Mechanism WRD shall establish and implement a grievance mechanism to receive and facilitate resolution of concerns and grievances, from the communities and other stakeholders including implementation partners. It shall be proportionate to the potential risks and impacts of the project and be accessible and inclusive. The department will establish three levels of Grievance Mechanism: 1. A cell at each of the dam site headed by respective Executive Engineer 2. A cell at the SPMU headed by CE/PD 3. A committee at the state government level headed by Secretary to Government Details on the processes and procedures for the GRM will be provided in in the Stakeholder Engagement Framework. 6.2 MONITORING REPORTING AND BUDGETING SPMU will prepare a monitoring, reporting and budgeting requirement to implement above plans and measures, which will be approved by CPMU - CWC. SPMU will prepare a quarterly monitoring report and submit to CPMU - CWC. 42 6.3 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL COMMITMENT PLAN (ESCP) AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS WRD, Manipur will agree on an Environmental and Social Commitment Plan (ESCP) with the Bank covering the material measures and actions that are required for the project to achieve compliance with the ESSs over a specified timeframe. It will take into account the findings of the environmental and social assessment, the Bank’s environmental and social due diligence and the results of engagement with stakeholders. ESCP will clearly spell out the plans to be prepared with time frame and responsibility. 43 Annexure I Ambient Air Quality Data (2019) NAME OF MONITORING STATION: MANIPUR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, IMPHAL WEST D.C. OFFICE COMPLEX, IMPHAL - STATION CODE NO. : 556 STN Sampling Monitoring Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Monitoring PM10_6_14 PM10_14_22 PM10_22_6 NO2_6_10 NO2_10_14 NO2_14_18 NO2_18_22 Code Date Station Location Name Agency Station Sampling Name of Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Monitoring 8-Hourly 8-Hourly Value 8-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly Code date*: monitoring Location Name Agency Value of PM10 of PM10 Value of Value of Value of Value of Value of station : PM10 NO2 NO2 NO2 NO2 556 11/01/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 155.05 75.38 - 38.51 36.93 32.89 32.86 556 14/01/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 137.75 55.83 - 28.87 30.98 29.70 23.19 556 16/01/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 150.28 126.39 - 45.49 31.23 21.33 36.38 556 23/01/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 125.11 145.32 - 30.29 11.22 29.46 25.49 556 25/01/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 152.52 156.42 - 31.79 18.41 35.64 43.51 556 28/01/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 141.003 110.96 - 19.93 18.43 2.57 6.66 556 30/01/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 107.904 106.65 - 3.64 13.80 10.13 5.02 STN Code Sampling SO2_6_10 SO2_10_14 SO2_14_18 SO2_18_22 Relative Wind Speed Wind Temperature(˚C) Temp Date Humidity Direction Station Sampling 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly Relative Wind Speed Wind Max Min Avg Code date*: Value of SO2 Value of SO2 Value of SO2 Value of SO2 Humidity Direction 556 11/01/2019 6.15 31.42 9.21 8.36 44% 6km/hr S to N 22 6 14 556 14/01/2019 11.57 10.64 9.57 15.93 48% 11km/hr S to N 21 6 13.5 556 16/01/2019 12.82 2.58 0.92 2.68 48% 7km/hr S to N 23 6 14.5 556 23/01/2019 10.41 4.28 0.84 2.50 37% No Wind --- 24 6 15 556 25/01/2019 1.68 4.52 0.9069 0.906 34% 6km/hr S to N 25 6 15.5 556 28/01/2019 4.28 0.904 1.77 31.14 45% 7km/hr SW to NE 24 8 16 556 30/01/2019 1.67 0.86 1.74 0.86 49% 7km/hr SW to NE 22 8 15 NAME OF MONITORING STATION: MANIPUR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, IMPHAL WEST D.C. OFFICE COMPLEX, IMPHAL - STATION CODE NO. : 556 STN Code Sampling Date Monitoring Station Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Name Monitoring SO2_6_10 SO2_10_14 SO2_14_18 SO2_18_22 NO2_6_10 NO2_10_14 NO2_14_18 NO2_18_22 Location Agency STN Code Sampling date*: Name of monitoring Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Name Monitoring 4-Hourly 4-Hourly Value of SO2 4-Hourly 4-Hourly Value of 4-Hourly Value 4-Hourly Value of 4-Hourly Value of 4-Hourly Value of NO2 station : Location Agency Value of SO2 Value of SO2 SO2 of NO2 NO2 NO2 556 2/2/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 4.26 5.43 6.23 2.07 11 2.8 10.72 12.02 556 6/2/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 7.78 6.14 5.17 6.08 7.54 21.15 10.68 1.31 556 8/2/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 2.14 5.37 4.15 5.04 8.29 15.25 12.06 14.33 556 18/2/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 0.94 3.80 1.902 3.77 23 14.74 19.65 27.97 556 22/2/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 3.59 4.87 - - 12.99 13.47 - - 556 25/2/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 1.63 4.92 3.35 - 40.05 8.47 21.63 - 556 27/2/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 0.73 2.94 - - 31.97 25.65 - - 556 28/2/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 2.18 4.43 4.33 4.30 36.54 8.58 20.95 36.13 0 Sampling PM10_6_14 PM10_14_22 PM10_22_6 Relative Wind Speed Wind Temperature(˚C) Temp Date Humidity Direction Station Sampling 8-Hourly 8-Hourly Value 8-Hourly Relative Wind Speed Wind Max Min Avg Code date*: Value of of PM10 Value of Humidity Direction PM10 PM10 556 2/2/2019 155.21 97.72 - 40% 4 km/hr SE to NW 25 8 16 556 6/2/2019 127.17 57.07 - 39% 6km/hr W to E 22 6 14 556 8/2/2019 128.24 54.80 - 36% 13km/hr S to N 26 14 20 556 18/2/2019 114.27 61.42 - 34% 15km/hr SW to NE 22 8 15 556 22/2/2019 143.34 - - 51% 9 km/hr W to E 23 12 17.5 556 25/2/2019 163.89 94.11 - 76% 9km/hr W to E 18 12 15 556 27/2/2019 82.01 - - 63% 9km/hr S to N 21 13 17 44 556 28/2/2019 84.36 47.97 - 70% 9km/hr E to W 19 11 15 NAME OF MONITORING STATION: MANIPUR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, IMPHAL WEST D.C. OFFICE COMPLEX, IMPHAL - STATION CODE NO. : 556 STN Sampling Monitoring Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Name Monitoring SO2_6_10 SO2_10_14 SO2_14_18 SO2_18_22 NO2_6_10 NO2_10_14 NO2_14_18 Code Date Station Location Agency Station Sampling Name of Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Name Monitoring 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly Code date*: monitoring Location Agency Value of Value of NO2 Value of NO2 Value of NO2 Value of SO2 Value of SO2 Value of SO2 station : NO2 556 4/3/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 3.58 7.37 12.57 6.33 16.63 14.28 1.98 556 6/3/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 3.67 1.52 4.61 3.04 17.07 14.69 18.86 556 8/3/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 9.79 2.17 3.71 3.04 4.52 20.58 30.15 556 11/3/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 1.71 2.43 1.49 1.48 33.03 16.75 9.67 556 13/3/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 2.31 20.20 3.98 8.53 14.90 15.59 16.48 556 15/3/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 1.48 0.75 0.74 0.75 25.84 14.55 41.37 556 19/3/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 0.77 1.58 1.57 1.59 31.69 32.69 49.68 556 27/3/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 0.74 1.46 - - 22.79 10.34 - STN Code Sampling NO2_18_22 PM10_6_14 PM10_14_22 PM10_22_6 Relative Humidity Wind Speed Wind Direction Temperature Temp Date Station Sampling 4-Hourly Value of 8-Hourly Value 8-Hourly Value 8-Hourly Value of Relative Humidity Wind Speed Wind Direction Temperature Code date*: SO2 of PM10 of PM10 PM10 (˚C) Avg Max Min 556 4/3/2019 3.06 107.72 36.98 - 48% No Wind - 22 7 14.5 556 6/3/2019 12.77 84.28 74.80 - 48% No Wind - 22 7 14.5 556 8/3/2019 22.54 105.22 86.82 - 45% 13km/hr W to E 21 11 16 556 11/3/2019 9.59 104.48 98.78 - 42% 15km/hr SW to NE 27 12 19.5 556 13/3/2019 48.95 111.19 96.38 - 30% 15 km/hr SW to NE 28 12 20 556 15/3/2019 40.37 112.51 106.63 - 62% 11km/hr W to E 28 13 20.5 556 19/3/2019 47.51 94.99 105.88 - 62% 11km/hr W to E 28 13 20.5 556 27/3/2019 - 101.32 - - 62% 11km/hr W to E 28 13 20.5 NAME OF MONITORING STATION: MANIPUR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, IMPHAL WEST D.C. OFFICE COMPLEX, IMPHAL - STATION CODE NO. : 556 STN Sampling Monitoring Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Name Monitoring SO2_6_10 SO2_10_14 SO2_14_18 SO2_18_22 NO2_6_10 N NO2_14_18 Code Date Station Location Agency O 2 Stati Sampling Name of Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Name Monitoring 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly Value 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4 4-Hourly _ on date*: monitoring Location Agency Value of Value of NO2 of NO2 Value of Value of SO2 - Value of SO2 1 Code station : NO2 NO2 H 0 o 556 3/4/2019 MPCB 24.8512 93.8464 C Imph Manipur MPCB 0.93 0.77 0.84 3.31 9.62 4 _ 28.27 u 556 8/4/2019 Office MPCB 24.8512 93.8464 C al Imph Manipur MPCB 1.55 1.57 15.61 29.15 48.04 . 1 4 2.88 r 556 12/4/201 Office MPCB 24.8512 93.8464 C al Imph Manipur MPCB 16.51 8.95 9 4 . 6 14.13 6.93 1.63 36.73 l 9 Office al 6 9 . 556 15/4/201 MPCB 24.8512 93.8464 C Imph Manipur MPCB 1.70 - 2.24 2.25 15.38 - y 19.30 9 Office al 6 3 556 20/4/201 MPCB 24.8512 93.8464 C Imph Manipur MPCB 1.89 24.83 - - 12.26 5 - 9 Office al 1 V . 556 22/4/201 MPCB 24.8512 93.8464 C Imph Manipur MPCB 1.73 0.82 8.49 1.71 11.17 1 45 9 Office al a 1 4 556 24/4/201 MPCB 24.8512 93.8464 C Imph Manipur MPCB 6.16 5.72 23.58 6.22 14.92 1 9.14 l 3 . 556 9 26/4/201 Office MPCB 24.8512 93.8464 C al Imph Manipur MPCB 3.76 0.81 3.84 0.75 10.69 7. 2 21.84 u 8 9 Office al 9 6. e 94 1 STN Code Sampling Date NO2_18_22 PM10_6_14 PM10_14_22 PM10_22 Relative Humidity Wind Speed Wind Direction Temperature Temp _6 o6 Station Code Sampling 4-Hourly 8-Hourly Value 8-Hourly Value Relative Humidity Wind Speed Wind Direction Temperature f date*: Value of SO2 of PM10 of PM10 (˚C) Avg S O 45 2 8-Hourly Max Min 556 3/4/2019 26.68 44.69 112.08 - of Value 43% 9km/hr SW to NE 27 14 20.5 556 13.51 92.97 66.20 PM10 - 58% 15 km/hr W to E 26 17 21.5 8/4/2019 556 12/4/2019 19.99 91.97 79.48 - 47% 9km/hr W to E 31 24 27.5 556 15/4/2019 24.19 125.79 110.24 - 68% 11km/hr SE to NW 26 18 22 556 20/4/2019 - 123.98 - - 39% 15 km/hr NW to SE 30 16 23 556 22/4/2019 46.35 136.24 149.47 - 60% 6km/hr NW to SE 26 22 24 556 24/4/2019 15.06 134.27 117.44 - 28% 15km/hr SW to NE 33 15 24 556 26/4/2019 12.60 143.20 107.39 - 41% 13km/hr SW to NE 33 19 26 NAME OF MONITORING STATION: MANIPUR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, IMPHAL WEST D.C. OFFICE COMPLEX, IMPHAL - STATION CODE NO. : 556 STN Sampling Monitoring Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Monitori SO2_6_10 SO2_10_1 SO2_14_18 SO2_18_22 NO2_6_10 NO2_10 NO2_14_1 Code Date Station Location Name ng 4 _14 8 Agency Station Sampling Name of Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Monitori 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly Code date*: monitoring Location Name ng Value of Value of Value of SO2 Value of SO2 Value of Value of Value of station : Agency SO2 SO2 NO2 NO2 NO2 556 3/5/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 0.74 1.54 0.79 1.58 2.65 1.37 4.98 556 8/5/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 2.39 1.56 2.44 2.41 1.42 2.08 1.45 556 10/5/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 0.73 0.76 4.61 1.56 2.6 2.02 2.05 556 20/5/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 1.63 3.85 1.57 0.8 1.45 10.26 4.87 556 27/5/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 1.61 4 0.87 0.88 1.43 2.12 5.46 556 28/5/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 1.47 0.79 2.37 0.81 1.31 3.54 2.10 556 29/5/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 0.78 2.33 0.78 0.79 1.38 2.76 1.39 556 30/5/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 0.75 3.81 1.59 0.79 1.99 4.74 2.12 STN Sampling NO2_18_22 PM10_6_14 PM10_14_2 PM10_22_6 Relative Wind Speed Wind Temperature Temp Code Date 2 Humidity Direction Station Sampling 4-Hourly 8-Hourly 8-Hourly 8-Hourly Value Relative Wind Speed Wind Temperature Code date*: Value of Value of Value of of PM10 Humidity Direction (˚C) Avg NO2 PM10 PM10 Max Min 556 3/5/2019 4.92 135.23 133.49 - 63% 4km/hr NW to SE 28 22 15 556 8/5/2019 1.43 103.35 116.55 - 44% 6km/hr W to E 32 20 26 556 10/5/2019 2.09 152.93 146.89 - 51% 17km/hr W to E 31 26 28.5 556 20/5/2019 5.00 102.54 169.12 - 50% 24km/hr SW to NE 32 21 26.5 556 27/5/2019 5.47 116.22 132.61 - 63% 15km/hr NW to SE 31 20 25.5 556 28/5/2019 2.14 104.88 110.69 - 54% 15km/hr SW to NE 32 20 26 556 29/5/2019 1.38 119.39 104.15 - 56% 11km/hr SW to NE 32 20 26 556 30/5/2019 2.10 118.54 112.04 - 48% 15km/hr W to E 33 20 26.5 NAME OF MONITORING STATION: MANIPUR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, IMPHAL WEST D.C. OFFICE COMPLEX, IMPHAL - STATION CODE NO. : 556 STN Sampling Monitoring Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Name Monitori SO2_6_10 SO2_10_14 SO2_14_1 SO2_18_22 NO2_6_10 NO2_10 NO2_14 Code Date Station Location ng 8 _14 _18 Agency Station Sampling Name of Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Name Monitori 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly Value 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly Code date*: monitoring Location ng Value of Value of SO2 Value of of SO2 Value of Value of Value of station : Agency SO2 SO2 NO2 NO2 NO2 556 10/6/201 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 7.66 9.04 5.86 5.78 10.58 12.42 26.79 556 9 12/6/201 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 4.94 7.85 3.96 2.82 2.19 12.55 7.59 556 9 17/6/201 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB - 0.81 1.86 0.93 - 1.44 2.49 556 9 19/6/201 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 3.22 - 0.81 - 0.74 - 0.72 556 9 21/6/201 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 7.85 9.11 5.86 5.96 0.77 11.47 11.16 556 9 24/6/201 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 7.95 8.10 10.92 3.14 8.48 7.93 14.56 9 46 556 26/6/201 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 1.55 20.11 4.14 1.96 2.06 27.17 5.52 556 9 28/6/201 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 3.16 5.54 3.36 4.11 1.4 7.03 6.71 9 STN Sampling NO2_18_22 PM10_6_14 PM10_14_22 PM10_22_6 Relative Wind Speed Wind Temperature Temp Code Date Humidity Direction Station Sampling 4-Hourly 8-Hourly Value 8-Hourly 8-Hourly Relative Wind Speed Wind Temperature Code date*: Value of NO2 of PM10 Value of Value of Humidity Direction (˚C) Avg PM10 PM10 Max Min 556 10/6/2019 10.27 81.54 90.76 - 73% 19km/hr NW to SE 31 23 27 556 12/6/2019 7.56 92.59 112.41 - 69% 17km/hr SE to NW 33 23 28 556 17/6/2019 2.47 95.66 112.39 - 77% 15km/hr SW to NE 31 23 27 556 19/6/2019 - 124.84 100.18 - 73% 9km/hr SW to NE 31 23 27 556 21/6/2019 6.05 91.14 112.49 - 69% 15km/hr SE to NW 32 24 28 556 24/6/2019 5.58 121.07 118.65 - 67% 15km/hr SW to NE 33 25 29 556 26/6/2019 5.24 107.96 116.68 - 71% 4km/hr SW to NE 30 24 27 556 28/6/2019 6.58 104.84 108.11 - 79% 11km/hr W to E 29 23 26 NAME OF MONITORING STATION: MANIPUR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, IMPHAL WEST D.C. OFFICE COMPLEX, IMPHAL - STATION CODE NO. : 556 STN Sampling Monitoring Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Name Monitoring SO2_6_1 SO2_10_1 SO2_14_18 SO2_18_ NO2_6_1 NO2_10_14 NO2_14 Code Date Station Location Agency 0 4 22 0 _18 Station Sampling Name of Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Name Monitoring 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4- Code date*: monitoring Location Agency Value of Value of Value of SO2 Value of Value of Value of NO2 Hourly station : SO2 SO2 SO2 NO2 Value of NO2 556 03/7/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 1.06 3.07 3.61 3.52 5.19 5.25 11.02 556 05/7/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 2.76 2.81 8.48 8.58 10.12 6.87 8.98 556 17/7/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 1.34 0.58 1.11 1.13 2.77 4.25 11.53 556 19/7/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 2.98 7.42 23.74 23.55 0.73 2.79 2.98 556 22/7/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 2.46 0.54 3.52 3.58 3.75 1.32 2.87 556 25/7/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 1.11 2.19 2.24 2.25 2.71 2.68 6.875 556 27/7/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 2.83 0.57 0.528 0.525 2.77 3.49 7.1 556 29/7/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 3.65 4.23 2.91 3.17 3.19 1.29 0.71 STN Sampling NO2_18_22 PM10_6_14 PM10_14_2 PM10_22_6 Relative Wind Speed Wind Temperat Temp Code Date 2 Humidity Direction ure Station Sampling 4-Hourly 8-Hourly Value 8-Hourly 8-Hourly Value Relative Wind Speed Wind Temperat Code date*: Value of NO2 of PM10 Value of of PM10 Humidity Direction ure (˚C) Avg PM10 Max Min 556 03/7/2019 10.76 132.91 115.62 - 65% 13km/hr W to E 32 24 28 556 05/7/2019 9.09 120.03 95.05 - 71% 22km/hr SE to NW 31 24 27.5 556 17/7/2019 11.69 74.11 100.26 - 62% 6km/hr W to E 31 22 26.5 556 19/7/2019 2.95 101.75 125.57 - 57% 7km/hr SW to NE 33 23 28 556 22/7/2019 2.92 71.19 62.57 - 78% 6km/hr W to E 28 24 26 556 25/7/2019 6.876 60.85 82.06 - 69% 22km/hr SE to NW 31 24 27.5 556 27/7/2019 7.06 23.09 38.36 - 57% 17km/hr SE to NW 30 22 26 556 29/7/2019 3.10 55.54 49.05 - 71% 15km/hr SW to NE 31 23 27 NAME OF MONITORING STATION: MANIPUR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, IMPHAL WEST D.C. OFFICE COMPLEX, IMPHAL - STATION CODE NO. : 556 STN Sampling Monitoring Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Name Monitoring SO2_6_10 SO2_10_14 SO2_14_18 SO2_18_22 NO2_6_10 NO2_10_14 NO2_14_18 Code Date Station Location Agency 47 Station Sampling Name of Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Name Monitoring 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly Code date*: monitoring Location Agency Value of SO2 Value of SO2 Value of SO2 Value of SO2 Value of NO2 Value of NO2 Value of NO2 station : 556 01/8/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 0.53 1.04 1.59 1.57 3.21 3.81 7.79 556 03/8/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 1.29 4.07 1.97 1.96 3.94 4.27 11.22 556 05/8/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 0.58 1.69 0.60 0.61 2.83 5.54 11.10 556 07/8/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 6.35 3.52 2.17 2.18 4.31 7.16 10.62 556 14/8/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 2.28 1.55 1.16 1.17 2.09 6.94 6.43 556 16/8/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 0.56 5.09 0.59 0.60 13.08 0.623 2.87 556 19/8/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 1.25 0.51 3.04 3.07 0.76 1.88 1.86 556 21/8/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 0.521 0.520 2.44 2.45 3.19 1.27 8.94 STN Code Sampling NO2_18_22 PM10_6_14 PM10_14_22 PM10_22_6 Relative Humidity Wind Speed Wind Direction Temperature Temp Date Station Code Sampling 4-Hourly Value of 8-Hourly Value 8-Hourly Value 8-Hourly Value of Relative Humidity Wind Speed Wind Direction Temperature (˚C) date*: NO2 of PM10 of PM10 PM10 Avg Max Min 556 01/8/2019 7.69 48.51 59.85 - 74% 6km/hr SE to NW 30 24 27 556 03/8/2019 11.16 52.15 90.04 - 76% 7km/hr SW to NE 30 23 26.5 556 05/8/2019 11.25 62.65 79.27 - 70% 24km/hr E to W 32 24 28 556 07/8/2019 10.65 46.66 55.23 - 85% 19km/hr NE to SW 28 24 26 556 14/8/2019 6.47 59.37 59.52 - 84% 15km/hr SW to NE 28 23 25.5 556 16/8/2019 2.94 67.14 62.85 - 77% 2km/hr NE to SW 28 24 26 556 19/8/2019 1.88 68.35 51.27 - 73% 19km/hr SW to NE 29 23 26 556 21/8/2019 8.98 71.84 39.78 - 82% 15km/hr SE to NW 30 24 27 NAME OF MONITORING STATION: MANIPUR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, IMPHAL WEST D.C. OFFICE COMPLEX, IMPHAL - STATION CODE NO. : 556 STN Sampling Monitoring Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Name Monitoring SO2_6_10 SO2_10_14 SO2_14_18 SO2_18_22 NO2_6_10 NO2_10_14 NO2_14_18 Code Date Station Location Agency Station Sampling Name of Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Name Monitoring 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly Code date*: monitoring Location Agency Value of Value of SO2 Value of SO2 Value of SO2 Value of Value of NO2 Value of NO2 station : SO2 NO2 556 6/9/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 2.55 0.88 1.78 1.79 2.74 3.77 1.43 556 9/9/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 1.83 0.90 1.87 1.84 4.93 2.43 4.53 556 12/9/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 2.66 2.60 2.28 1.70 4.76 2.79 3.06 556 18/9/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 4.27 5.59 1.23 1.13 4.14 4.00 1.32 556 20/9/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 2.72 0.93 2.79 2.86 3.90 4.49 3.00 556 26/9/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 0.90 2.09 4.29 4.67 0.97 2.81 5.19 556 27/9/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 0.96 1.75 2.83 3.64 2.59 1.88 2.54 556 28/9/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 2.59 1.75 4.91 4.90 2.79 4.23 6.34 STN Code Sampling NO2_18_22 PM10_6_14 PM10_14_22 PM10_22_6 Relative Humidity Wind Speed Wind Direction Temperature Temp Date Station Code Sampling 4-Hourly Value of 8-Hourly Value 8-Hourly Value 8-Hourly Value of Relative Humidity Wind Speed Wind Direction Temperature date*: NO2 of PM10 of PM10 PM10 (˚C) Avg Max Min 556 6/9/2019 1.44 61.11 71.85 - 61% 15km/hr SE to NW 30 24 27 556 9/9/2019 4.44 52.49 60.67 - 73% 6km/hr W to E 29 23 26 556 12/9/2019 2.29 41.77 34.28 - 82% 2km/hr NE to SW 28 22 25 556 18/9/2019 1.22 87.33 121.04 - 63% 7km/hr SE to NW 31 22 26.5 556 20/9/2019 3.08 110.75 103.95 - 71% 7km/hr SW to NE 30 23 26.5 48 556 26/9/2019 5.65 92.89 115.64 - 68% 11km/hr SE to NW 28 21 24.5 556 27/9/2019 3.26 81.02 102.35 - 67% 9km/hr S to N 28 20 24 556 28/9/2019 6.33 85.37 100.90 - 63% 11km/hr SE to NW 29 20 24.5 NAME OF MONITORING STATION: MANIPUR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, IMPHAL WEST D.C. OFFICE COMPLEX, IMPHAL - STATION CODE NO. : 556 STN Sampling Monitoring Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Name Monitoring SO2_6_10 SO2_10_14 SO2_14_18 SO2_18_22 NO2_6_10 NO2_10_14 NO2_14_18 Code Date Station Location Agency Station Sampling Name of Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Name Monitoring 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly Code date*: monitoring Location Agency Value of Value of SO2 Value of SO2 Value of SO2 Value of Value of NO2 Value of NO2 station : SO2 NO2 556 1/10/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 1.85 3.54 0.93 0.94 2.41 24.59 21.91 556 3/10/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 0.93 1.78 0.89 0.90 21.03 23.99 22.40 556 5/10/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 4.36 5.39 3.58 3.66 21.22 24.19 19.46 556 9/10/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 6.48 6.38 5.96 6.08 25.75 22.18 28.49 556 11/10/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 0.89 2.64 2.59 2.61 18.47 21.40 18.06 556 14/10/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 3.65 0.92 - - 11.88 10.43 4.09 556 16/10/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 1.72 0.89 1.75 1.74 11.94 14.01 3.81 556 18/10/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB - 0.88 1.00 1.01 - 12.95 4.38 STN Code Sampling NO2_18_22 PM10_6_14 PM10_14_22 PM10_22_6 Relative Humidity Wind Speed Wind Direction Temperature Temp Date Station Code Sampling 4-Hourly Value of 8-Hourly Value 8-Hourly Value 8-Hourly Value of Relative Humidity Wind Speed Wind Direction Temperature date*: NO2 of PM10 of PM10 PM10 (˚C) Avg Max Min 556 1/10/2019 22.08 104.52 89.38 - 67% 4km/hr SW to NE 28 22 25 556 3/10/2019 22.76 38.78 76.71 - 64% 4km/hr NE to SW 29 21 25 556 5/10/2019 19.88 131.44 38.84 - 66% 9km/hr SE to NW 30 21 25.5 556 9/10/2019 29.04 34.67 55.69 - 42% 6km/hr SW to NE 30 20 25 556 11/10/2019 18.15 37.66 54.69 - 68% 15km/hr W to E 28 20 24 556 14/10/2019 4.08 97.17 101.69 - 57% 7km/hr SW to NE 31 20 25.5 556 16/10/2019 3.80 95.27 141.22 - 68% 6km/hr NE to SW 27 21 24 556 18/10/2019 4.39 137.42 139.22 - 53% 4km/hr SW to NE 30 20 25 NAME OF MONITORING STATION: MANIPUR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, IMPHAL WEST D.C. OFFICE COMPLEX, IMPHAL - STATION CODE NO. : 556 STN Sampling Monitoring Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Name Monitoring SO2_6_10 SO2_10_14 SO2_14_18 SO2_18_22 SO2_22_2 SO2_2_6 NO2_6_10 Code Date Station Location Agency Station Sampling Name of Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Name Monitoring 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly Code date*: monitoring Location Agency Value of Value of SO2 Value of SO2 Value of SO2 Value of Value of SO2 Value of station : SO2 SO2 NO2 556 20/10/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 4.31 2.64 3.52 2.63 2.62 2.63 23.19 556 21/10/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 1.78 3.63 1.79 3.59 2.71 2.7 23.22 556 22/10/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 2.71 2.67 3.58 2.69 0.9 0.89 24.3 556 23/10/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 0.89 2.71 2.72 2.7 1.79 1.79 19.35 556 24/10/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 2.78 1.83 7.05 4.48 3.62 3.54 31.41 556 25/10/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 1.81 0.91 0.88 0.87 0.88 0.89 7.85 556 26/10/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 1.01 3.06 3.08 2.0 - - 7.91 556 27/10/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 1.17 4.85 1.2 2.35 3.49 3.42 22.31 49 556 28/10/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 2.63 0.88 0.88 2.65 0.88 0.87 11.43 556 29/10/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 7.66 3.63 0.89 0.9 0.88 0.87 13.31 556 30/10/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 2.62 2.6 2.0 2.0 0.98 0.97 6.84 556 31/10/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 0.93 3.76 2.86 3.88 2.87 2.79 15.34 556 1/11/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 0.87 3.48 11.31 2.62 6.87 6.59 1.51 556 2/11/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 10.15 0.85 6.03 0.85 1.68 1.65 21.32 556 3/11/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 0.85 9.64 0.88 12.18 0.86 0.85 27.47 NAME OF MONITORING STATION: MANIPUR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, IMPHAL WEST D.C. OFFICE COMPLEX, IMPHAL - STATION CODE NO. : 556 STN Sampling NO2_10_14 NO2_14_18 NO2_18_22 NO2_22_2 NO2_2_6 PM10_6_14 PM10_14_22 PM10_22_6 PM2.5_6_6 Relative Wind Speed Wind Temperature Temp Code Date Humidity Direction Station Sampling 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 8-Hourly 8-Hourly Value 8-Hourly 24-Hourly Relative Wind Speed Wind Temperature Code date*: Value of NO2 Value of NO2 Value of NO2 Value of NO2 Value of Value of PM10 of PM10 Value of PM10 Value of Humidity Direction (˚C) Avg NO2 PM2.5 Max Min 556 20/10/2019 21.45 20.63 19.05 20.53 20.58 111.96 90.62 81.45 69.83 57% 7km/hr SE to NW 30 20 25 556 21/10/2019 15.78 19.41 18.73 18.84 18.77 113.61 83.41 97.27 44.86 53% 11km/hr SW to NE 30 19 24.5 556 22/10/2019 23.17 23.36 24.2 23.48 23.11 88.12 97.89 101.09 43.88 85% 11km/hr SW to NE 24 19 21.5 556 23/10/2019 21.97 21.3 20.35 28.81 28.73 101.82 88.61 144.27 46.47 56% 7km/hr SW to NE 28 18 23 556 24/10/2019 27.09 15.33 23.36 21.25 20.74 143.29 69.53 105.38 38.76 78% 11km/hr W to E 24 19 21.5 556 25/10/2019 3.16 30.12 32.6 16.09 16.18 91.05 130.49 108.38 37.23 73% 7km/hr NW to SE 25 18 21.5 556 26/10/2019 30.12 34.74 5.21 - - 89.64 55.96 - 28.54 78% 2km/hr NW to SE 24 20 22 556 27/10/2019 20 19.89 22.47 25.28 24.74 99.31 32.92 112.89 22.39 85% 6km/hr NE to SW 24 20 22 556 28/10/2019 12.23 19.11 18.39 19.16 19.82 123.32 59.89 132.61 37.17 62% 7km/hr SE to NW 28 20 24 556 29/10/2019 34.66 18.73 15.64 9.93 9.85 84.98 94.77 92.46 17.87 62% 6km/hr SE to NW 28 19 23.5 556 30/10/2019 6.79 18.29 15.64 17.11 16.98 109.21 117.91 96.1 20.34 61% 4km/hr SW to NE 28 19 23.5 556 31/10/2019 15.5 20.72 31.16 13.29 12.92 160.01 97.09 177.61 27.05 88% 4km/hr W to E 22 21 21.5 556 1/11/2019 4.54 16.64 13.65 14.93 17.2 111.09 98.65 92.68 29.18 52% 4km/hr S to N 28 19 23.5 556 2/11/2019 22.9 15.72 14.74 13.13 12.87 93.56 124.11 100 32.33 49% 6km/hr SE to NW 29 17 23 556 3/11/2019 17.52 21.39 18.14 14.89 14.78 115.47 98.72 115.84 29.17 58% 4km/hr SW to NE 29 16 22.5 NAME OF MONITORING STATION: MANIPUR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, IMPHAL WEST D.C. OFFICE COMPLEX, IMPHAL - STATION CODE NO. : 556 STN Sampling Monitoring Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Name Monitoring SO2_6_10 SO2_10_14 SO2_14_18 SO2_18_22 SO2_22_2 SO2_2_6 NO2_6_10 Code Date Station Location Agency Station Sampling Name of Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Name Monitoring 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly Code date*: monitoring Location Agency Value of Value of SO2 Value of SO2 Value of SO2 Value of Value of Value of station : SO2 SO2 SO2 NO2 556 16/11/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 2.54 2.65 2.64 2.63 4.27 4.1 13.96 556 18/11/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 5.91 6.22 6.19 6.12 8.59 8.25 6.85 556 20/11/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 9.6 9.98 11.2 11.06 11.76 11.49 16.69 556 22/11/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 11.31 11.34 11.25 11.39 13.92 13.6 6.05 556 23/11/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 15.3 15.95 14.11 14.14 15.58 15.07 29.55 50 556 25/11/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 17.01 17.31 15.58 15.42 17.99 17.41 14.78 556 27/11/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 16.24 17.03 17.39 17.26 19.29 17.93 18.82 556 29/11/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 2.72 2.87 5.43 5.49 6.22 5.75 13.4 STN Sampling NO2_10_14 NO2_14_18 NO2_18_22 NO2_22_2 NO2_2_6 PM10_6_14 PM10_14_22 PM10_22_6 PM2.5_6_6 Relative Wind Wind Temperature Temp Code Date Humidity Speed Direction Station Sampling 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 8-Hourly 8-Hourly 8-Hourly 24-Hourly Relative Wind Wind Temperature Code date*: Value of Value of Value of Value of Value of Value of Value of PM10 Value of Value of Humidity Speed Direction (˚C) Avg NO2 NO2 NO2 NO2 NO2 PM10 PM10 PM2.5 Max Min 556 16/11/2019 14.59 22.93 22.87 13.37 12.84 169.83 178.58 125.63 41.37 46% 6km/hr S to N 27 15 21 556 18/11/2019 7.2 26.88 26.6 21.64 20.79 144.77 158.05 136.92 46.53 54% 4km/hr S to N 26 11 18.5 556 20/11/2019 17.35 24.33 24.02 25.95 25.37 137.95 157.65 179.19 58.88 57% 7km/hr S to N 26 14 20 556 22/11/2019 6.06 23.31 23.62 29.48 28.81 102.47 142.57 136.14 59.79 48% 6km/hr SE to NW 25 13 19 556 23/11/2019 30.81 20.69 20.74 20.31 19.65 131.67 133.37 153.32 57.1 47% 4km/hr SE to NW 25 10 17.5 556 25/11/2019 15.04 22.57 22.33 30.52 29.54 180.44 148.94 183.26 60.95 55% 4km/hr SW to NE 25 12 18.5 556 27/11/2019 19.73 22.28 22.1 25.91 24.08 171.92 150.92 168.18 80.7 64% 4km/hr SE to NW 25 11 18 556 29/11/2019 14.12 8.66 8.75 37.84 34.96 98.22 130.76 102.19 48.33 65% 7km/hr S to N 23 10 16.5 NAME OF MONITORING STATION: MANIPUR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, IMPHAL WEST D.C. OFFICE COMPLEX, IMPHAL - STATION CODE NO. : 556 STN Sampling Monitoring Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Name Monitoring SO2_6_10 SO2_10_14 SO2_14_18 SO2_18_22 SO2_22_2 SO2_2_6 NO2_6_10 Code Date Station Location Agency Station Sampling Name of Latitude Longitude Type Of City State Name Monitoring 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly Code date*: monitoring Location Agency Value of Value of Value of SO2 Value of SO2 Value of Value of SO2 Value of station : SO2 SO2 SO2 NO2 556 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 2.61 4.32 4.17 47.17 5/12/2019 1.69 1.75 2.63 556 10/12/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 2.69 2.84 5.3 5.4 6.09 5.79 33.53 556 18/12/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 10.1 10.53 9.59 9.33 8.37 8.27 50.93 556 21/12/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 11.23 11.69 9.33 9.23 11.81 11.64 47.28 556 23/12/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 14.03 14.47 14.91 14.45 13.46 13.26 28.95 556 26/12/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 18.79 18.85 13.59 13.56 15.26 14.89 57.64 556 28/12/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 13.29 13.26 15.85 15.45 16.24 16.08 22.28 556 30/12/2019 MPCB Office 24.8512 93.8464 C Imphal Manipur MPCB 15.65 16.53 17.13 16.74 16.61 16.36 24 STN Sampling NO2_10_14 NO2_14_18 NO2_18_22 NO2_22_2 NO2_2_6 PM10_6_14 PM10_14_22 PM10_22_6 PM2.5_6_6 Relative Wind Wind Temperature Temp Code Date Humidity Speed Direction Station Sampling 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 4-Hourly 8-Hourly 8-Hourly 8-Hourly 24-Hourly Relative Wind Wind Temperature Code date*: Value of Value of Value of Value of Value of Value of Value of PM10 Value of Value of Humidity Speed Direction (˚C) Avg NO2 NO2 NO2 NO2 NO2 PM10 PM10 PM2.5 Max Min 556 5/12/2019 48.77 55.62 49.14 57.02 55.03 149.25 194.73 196.9 66.93 42% 4km/hr SE to NW 24 9 16.5 556 10/12/2019 35.35 37.65 38.35 35.54 33.78 185.85 171.1 148.76 53.85 68% 9km/hr SE to NW 20 8 16 556 18/12/2019 53.1 50.03 48.64 39.29 38.81 143.25 137.78 114.88 37.3 47% 6km/hr SE to NW 23 7 15 556 21/12/2019 49.26 47.89 47.42 27.13 26.73 113.97 89.09 165.59 47.03 51% 4km/hr SE to NW 21 7 16 556 23/12/2019 29.86 24.39 23.64 48.27 47.55 69.46 140.52 181.83 74.6 33% 15km/hr SW to NE 21 8 14.5 556 26/12/2019 57.83 32.07 31.98 11.61 11.32 77.78 90.17 125.29 63.68 23% 4km/hr E to W 20 4 12 556 28/12/2019 22.23 42.12 41.07 20.38 20.19 167.19 179.98 123.79 70.98 53% 4km/hr S to N 19 10 14.5 556 30/12/2019 25.34 31.44 30.72 43.31 42.66 131.41 101.67 140.42 65.51 73% 9km/hr S to N 21 6 13.5 51 Annexure II Socio-eonomic Profile of Proximity Area (Study Area) Study area is defined as proximity town/urban area i.e. Imphal town. A. Demography of Study Area S. No. Description Number Percentage to Respective Total 1 Total Population 1,93,459 100.0 Male 94,451 48.82 Female 99,008 51.18 Sex Ratio 1048 2 Population (0-6 age group) 19,830 100.0 Male 10,184 51.36 Female 9,646 48.64 Child Sex Ratio 947 3 Scheduled Caste (SC) Population 1,077 100.0 Male 550 51.07 Female 527 48.93 Sex Ratio 958 4 Scheduled Tribe (ST) Population 16,623 100.0 Male 7,934 47.73 Female 8,689 52.27 Sex Ratio 1095 5 General Category (Including OBC) 1,75,759 100.0 Male 85,967 48.91 Female 89,792 51.09 Sex Ratio 1044 6 Total No. of Households 42,820 Average Household Size 5 7 Total Literates 1,59,216 100.0 Male 80,754 50.72 Female 78,462 49.28 Overall Literacy Rate 91.70 Male Literacy Rate 95.83 Female Literacy Rate 87.80 Gender Gap in Literacy Rate 8.03 8 Total Workers 76,628 100.0 Male 46,465 60.64 Female 30,163 39.36 Gender Gap in Work Participation Rate 21.28 9 Main Workers 62,092 100.0 Male 39,569 63.73 Female 22,523 36.27 Gender Gap in Work Participation Rate 27.46 10 Marginal Workers 14,536 100.0 Male 6,896 47.44 Female 7,640 52.56 Gender Gap in Work Participation Rate -5.12 11 Household Industrial Workers 4,948 100.0 Male 2,045 41.33 Female 2,903 58.67 12 Cultivators 621 100.0 Male 370 59.58 Female 251 40.42 13 Agricultural Labour 922 100.0 52 Male 568 61.61 Female 354 38.39 14 ‘Other Workers’ 70,137 100.0 Male 43,482 62.00 Female 26,655 38.00 Source: Census of India, 2011 B. Population Composition According to above table, the data reveals that total population of the study area has been worked out to 1,93,459. The gender wise distribution of the above population is 94,451 (48.82%) male and 99,008 (51.18%) female. The overall sex ratio of the study area has been worked out to 1,048 females per 1,000 males. The entire population of the study area is distributed into approx. 42,820 households and the average household size is five. Share of Population Population Distribution 193459 Male 94451 99008 Female 48.82% 51.18% Total Male Female Population C. Child Population Distribution In the study area, the total child population of 0-6 age group has been worked out to 19,830 which represent 10.25% of the total population. Of the total child population, 51.36 % are boys and remaining 48.64% are girl child. The child sex ratio in this age group is 947 girls per 1,000 boys. Child Population Share of Child Population 19830 10184 9646 Girls Boys 48.64% 51.36% Child Boys Girls Population D. Social Group Population Distribution Total population of the study area is distributed into different social groups like Scheduled Caste (SC), Scheduled Tribe (ST) and General Category (including OBC). The share of these social groups’ population to the total population of the study area is 0.56%, 8.59% and 90.85% respectively. 53 Population Distribution Share of Social Groups Population SC ST 0.56% 8.59% 193459 175759 Gen (+ 16623 1077 OBC) 90.85% Total SC ST Gen (+ OBC) Population  Scheduled Caste (SC) Population: In the study area, Scheduled Caste population has been worked out to only 1,077 which constitute about 0.56% of the total population. Of this, 51.07% is male and 48.93% is female. The sex ratio among Scheduled Caste population has been worked out to 958 females per 1,000 males. SC Population Share of SC Population 1077 Female 550 527 48.93% Male 51.07% SC Population Male Female  Scheduled Tribe Population: The Scheduled Tribe population in the study area has been worked out to 16,623 which represent 8.59% of the total population. Of the total Scheduled Tribe population, 47.73% is male and 52.27% is female. The sex ratio among the Scheduled Tribe population has been worked out to 1,095 females per 1,000 males. Share of ST Population ST Population 16623 Male 7934 8689 Female 47.73% 52.27% ST Population Male Female  General Category (including OBC) Population: The population of this group has been worked out to 1,75,759 which is 90.85% of the total population of the study area. Of this, 48.91% is male and 51.09% is female. The sex ratio among this group of population has been worked out to 1,044 females per 1,000 males. 54 General Population Share of General Population 175759 85967 89792 Male Female 48.91% 51.09% Gen Population Male Female E. Literates, Literacy Rate and Gender Gap in Literacy Rate In the study area, 82.30% of the population is literate in which male literates are 50.72% and that of females are 49.28%. The overall literacy rate in the study area has been worked out to 91.70%. The male literacy rate is 95.83% and female literacy rate is 87.80%, creating a gender gap in literacy rate of 8.03%. Literate Population Share of Literates 159216 Female 80754 78462 Literates Male 49.28% Literates 50.72% Total Literates Male Literates Female Literates F. Workers and Work Participation Rate The economic classification of workers as per Census 2011 is saying that total number of workers in the study area is 76,628 which constitute 39.61% of the total population. Of the total workers, 60.64% are males and remaining 39.36% are females. In absolute term, total number of male workers is 46,465 and that of female is 30,163. The gender gap in work participation rate is 21.28%. Share of Working Population Working Population 76628 Female Workers 46465 39.36% Male 30163 Workers 60.64% Total Workers Male Workers Female Workers Further of the total workers, 81.03% are main workers and remaining 18.97% are marginal workers. Of the total main workers, 63.73% are male and remaining 36.27% are female which creates a gender gap in work participation rate of 27.46%. In case of marginal workers, 47.44% are male and 52.56% are female that creates a gender gap of minus (-) 5.12% in this segment of work participation. 55 Distribution of Workers Share of Workers (Main Vs Marginal) (Main Vs Marginal) Marginal 76628 Workers 62092 18.97% 14536 Main Workers Total Workers Main Workers Marginal 81.03% Workers The workers are further divided into Cultivators, Agricultural Labours, Household Industrial Workers and ‘Other Workers’. Their shares in the total workers are 0.81%, 1.20%, 6.46% and 91.53% respectively. Distribution of Workers with Various Share of various Occupational Population Occupations Agri Cultivators Labours 0.81% 1.20% HH 76628 70137 Industrial 6.46% 621 922 4948 Other Workers 91.53% Agriculture is the third most important source of livelihood in the study area next to ‘Household Industrial Workers’. Rice is the most important crop grown in the study area. Maize, potato, pulses, chillies, oil seeds, vegetables like cabbage, cauliflower, cucumbers, peas, beans, etc. are other important crops & vegetables produced in the area. ‘Household Industrial Workers’ who is part of the small scale establishments run as a household industry involving production & manufacturing of handloom and handicraft products which is the only important industry with regard to employment potential particularly females. Bed shits, phaneks, mosquito nets, bamboo baskets, mats, fishing nets, furniture, carpentry products, pottery articles etc. are some of the notable products manufacturing by the people of the area. ‘Other Workers’ which include those activities engaged as government servants, municipal employees, teachers, construction workers, entertainment artists, trade, commerce, business, transport, banking etc. G. Basic Amenities The basic amenities like education, health, drinking water, electricity, approach road, transportation and other facilities available in the study area are given in the following table: Basic Amenities Available in the Study Area 56 EDUCATION Type of Educational Institutions Number Primary School (Govt.) 46 Primary School (Pvt.) 31 Middle School (Govt.) 16 Middle School (Pvt.) 33 Secondary School (Govt.) 23 Secondary School (Pvt.) 32 Sr. Secondary School (Govt.) 07 Sr. Secondary School (Pvt.) 09 Degree College-Art only (Govt.) 06 Degree College- Art only (Pvt.) 02 Degree College- Science only (Govt.) 06 Educational Institutions Degree College- Science only (Pvt.) 02 Degree College- Commerce only (Govt.) 01 Degree College- Art & Science only (Govt.) 03 Degree College- Art & Science only (Pvt.) 01 Degree College- Art & Commerce only (Govt.) 01 Degree College- Art, Science & Commerce (Govt.) 07 Degree College- Law (Govt.) 01 University-Degree College (Govt.) 01 Medical College (Govt.) 01 Engineering College (Govt.) 01 Management Institute (Govt.) 01 Polytechnic Institute 01 HEALTH Type of Health Facilities Number Dispensary/Health Centre 14 Hospital (Alternative Medicine) 01 Family Welfare Centre 14 Health Facilities Maternity and Child Welfare Centre 10 Maternity Home 01 T.B. Hospital/Clinic 01 Nursing Home 45 Non-govt. Charitable Hospital/Nursing Home 45 WATER Tap (Treated & Un-treated) Means of Drinking Water Hand Pump Tube wells ELECTRICITY Power for Domestic Uses Types of Electricity Available Power for Agriculture Uses Power for Commercial & Industrial Uses ROAD Black Topped (Paved/Pucca) Road Types of Approach Roads Gravel (Mud/Kachcha) Road Footpath Road TRANSPORTATION Private Bus Services Types of Road Transportation Auto/Modified Autos Available Taxi Services OTHER AMENITIES Open & Closed Drainage System Stadium (Govt.) Auditorium/Community Hall (Govt. & Pvt.) Other Amenities Public Library (Govt. & Pvt.) Public Reading Room Nationalised/Private Commercial/Co-operative Bank Agricultural & Non-agricultural Credit Society 57 Source: Census of India, 2011 Basic amenities like water supply for drinking and other uses is available with various sources such as Tap (Treated & Un-treated), Hand Pump, Tube wells etc. Electricity is available for domestic, agriculture, commercial & industrial uses in almost all over the study area. The study area having approach roads as Black Topped (Paved), Gravel (Kachcha) and Footpath. Health & educational institutions are also available significantly. For recreational activities, there are some Stadiums operated by government authority, Auditorium/Community Hall made by government & private agencies. 58