Documento f The WorldBank FOR OFFICIALUSEONLY ReportNo: 36273-AFR TECHNICALANNEX 3 ONA PROPOSEDGRANT FROMTHE GLOBALENVIRONMENTFACILITY TRUST FUND INTHEAMOUNTOFUS$6.9MILLION TO THE UNITEDREPUBLIC OF TANZANIA INSUPPORTOF THE US$21.7 MILLIONAFRICA STOCKPILE PROGRAMME -PROJECT 1 November 7,2006 Africa StockpilesProgrammeTeam Africa Region Middle East andNorthAfrica Region This document has a restricted distribution and may be usedby recipients only inthe performance o f their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCYEQUIVALENTS 1,221 Tanzania Shillings = 1US$ (April 1,2006) FISCALYEAR July 1-June 30 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AfDB African Development Bank AFR Africa Region APL Adaptable Program Loan ASP Africa Stockpiles Programme ASP-P1 Africa Stockpiles Programme - Project 1 ASP-PCU Africa Stockpiles Programme - Project Coordination Unit ASP-SC Africa Stockpiles Programme SteeringCommittee CAS Country Assistance Strategy CCAME Cross-Cutting Activities ManagementEntity CESA Country Project-specific Environment and Social Assessment CFAA Country Financial Accountability Assessment CIDA CanadianInternational Development Agency CLI Crop Life International CPI Country Project Indicators DDT Dichloro-Diphenyl-Trichloroethane DGF Development Grant Facility EA Environmental Assessment EMP Environmental ManagementPlan EU EuropeanUnion FA0 FoodandAgriculture Organization FFEM FrenchFacility for Global Environment FM Financial Management FMR Financial ManagementReport FMS Financial Management Specialist GEF Global Environment Facility GEFSEC Secretariat o fthe Global Environment Facility GEO Global Environmental Objective GTZ Gesellschaftfu'r Technische Zusammenarbeit (GermanAid Agency) ICB International Competitive Bidding IDA International Development Agency IPM Integrated Pest Management ISDS Integrated Safeguards Data Sheet LIB Limited InternationalBidding IVB Integrated Vector Management MDTF Multi-Donor Trust Fund MNA MiddleEast andNorthAfrica Region MOE Ministry ofEnvironment M&E Monitoring and Evaluation NCB NationalCompetitive Bidding NEPAD NewPartnershipfor Africa's Development NEMC NationalEnvironment ManagementCouncil NGOs Non-Governmental Organizations NIP NationalImplementation Plan NSC National SteeringCommittee O M Operational Manual OP Operational Program PAD Project Appraisal Document PAN-Africa PesticidesAction Network PAN-UK PesticidesAction Network UnitedKingdom -- Africa PDO Project Development Objective PMP Pest ManagementPlan PMU Project ManagementUnit POPS Persistent Organic Pollutants PCT Project Coordination Team RAP Resettlement Action Plan SA Special Account SOE Statements o fExpenditure TA Technical Assistance TF Trust Fund TORS Terms o f References TSU Technical Support Unit TTL Task Team Leader UN UnitedNations UNDB UnitedNations Development Business UNEP UnitedNations Environment Programme WWF World Wildlife Fund Vice President: Gobind T. Narikani (AFR) Country Director: MarkD.Tomlinson (CD16) Sector Director: Michel Wormser (AFTSD) SectorManager: MaryBarton-Dock (AFTS4) Task Team Leaders: PeterKristensedDenis Jordv (AFTS4) -11 .. - - v - AFRICA REGION MIDDLEEASTAND NORTHAFRICA REGION AFRICA STOCKPILESPROGRAMME. PROJECT1 TANZANIA PROJECT CONTENTS A. 1 Country and Sector Issues ...................................................................................................... ..................................................................... 1 2. Rationale for Bank Involvement 1. STRATEGIC CONTEXT AND RATIONALE ............................................................................................ 1 .3.... . HigherLevelObjectives to whichtheProject Contributes ................................................... 2 B PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................... 1 Financing Instrument ............................................................................................................. 3 3 2 Project Development Objective andKeyIndicators 3 Project Components ............................................................................................................... .............................................................. 3 3 4 LessonsLearned andReflected inthe Project Design 6 7 C.5..IMPLEMENTATION............................................................................................................. ........................................................... Alternatives Considered andReasonsfor Rejection.............................................................. 7 1 Institutional andImplementationArrangements ................................................................... 7 2. Financing Partners ................................................................................................................. 3 MonitoringandEvaluation of Outcome Results ................................................................... 8 8 4 Sustainability andReplicability .. ............................................................................................. 5. Critical Risks andPossible Controversial Aspects ................................................................ 9 9 12 D APPRAISAL SUMMARY .6. Loadcredit Conditions and Covenants ............................................................................... ................................................................................................... 12 1. Economic andFinancial Analyses ....................................................................................... 12 2. Technical 3 Fiduciary .............................................................................................................................. . .............................................................................................................................. 12 4 Social.................................................................................................................................... 13 14 5 Environment 14 6 SafeguardPolicies .... ......................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................ ......................................................................................... 15 ANNEXES.................................................................................................................................... 7 Policy Exceptions andReadiness 16 17 Annex 2: Major RelatedProjects Financedby the Bank and/or Other Agencies........................ Annex 1: Africa Stockpiles ProgrammeBackground .................................................................. 17 Annex 3: ResultsFramework and Monitoring............................................................................. 21 25 Annex 4: DetailedProject Description ........................................................................................ 31 Annex 5: Project Costs ................................................................................................................. Annex 6: Implementation Arrangements..................................................................................... 38 40 Annex 7: Financial Management andDisbursementArrangements ........................................... Annex 8: Procurement................................................................................................................. 47 51 Annex 9: Incremental Cost Analysis for Overall ASP-P1 ............................................................ 59 Annex 10: SafeguardPolicy Issues .............................................................................................. 70 .vi. Annex 12: Documents inthe Project File.................................................................................... Annex 11: Project Preparation andSupervision: Tanzania ......................................................... 74 Annex 13: Statementof Loans andCredits .................................................................................. 76 Annex 14: Tanzania at a Glance................................................................................................... 78 Maps: IBRD34040 and 33113R.................................................... 80 Error!Bookmarknot defined . .vii. AFRICA STOCKPILES PROGRAMME PROJECT 1-TANZANIA PROJECT - PROJECTAPPRAISAL DOCUMENT AFRICA REGION MIDDLEEAST AND NORTHAFRICA REGION ASP TEAM SectorManagers:MaryBarton-Dock (AFR) GeneralAgriculture (100%) FA0(Netherlands) 0.02 0.20 0.22 0.38 0.01 0.39 Recipient: ResponsibleAgency: Governmentof Tanzania National EnvironmentManagementCouncil (NEMC) P.O. Box 63154 Dares Salaam, Tanzania Tel: (255) 22 213 4603 Fax: (255) 22 211 1579 Email: nernc@,nemctz.org Contact: Mr.BonaventureBaya, - v - Projectimplementationperiod: 4 Years Expectedeffectiveness date: February 12,2007 Expectedclosingdate: June 30,2010 Does the project depart from the CAS incontent or other significant respects? [ ]Yes [x ] Re$ PAD A.3 No Does the project require any exceptions from Bank policies? Re$ PAD D.7 Have these been approved by Bank management? No I s approval for any policy exception sought from the Board? Does the project include any critical risks rated "substantial" or "high"? Ref PAD C.5 Does the project meet the Regional criteria for readiness for implementation? Re$ PAD D.7 [x ]Yes 1 No Projectdevelopmentobjective: Re$ PAD B.2, TechnicalAnnex 3 ASP-PI: Selected African countries eliminate inventoried publicly-held obsolete pesticide stockpiles and associated waste, and implement measures to reduce and prevent future related risks. Tanzania: Assist the Government o f Tanzania to dispose o f the publicly-held obsolete pesticide stocks at priority selected sites and support priority actions to help prevent the future accumulationo f new stocks o f obsolete pesticides. GlobalEnvironmentalObjective(GEO): Re$ PADA.3, TechnicalAnnex 3 Reductiono fthe effects o f Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPS) on the Global Environment. - vi - Projectdescription: Re$ PADB.3.a, TechnicalAnnex 4 The proposed Project i s part of the World Bank's multi-country Africa Stockpiles Programme (ASP-Pl), which has been endorsed by the GEF CEO on August 16, 2005 and by the World Bank Board on September 8,2005. The overall ASP-PI includes: (a) country operations (ASP-P1 Component 1); (b) technical supportto country projects (ASP-P1 Component 2); (c) cross cutting activities incommunication and knowledge management (ASP-P1 Component 3) ;and, (d) programcoordination (ASP-P1 Component4). The Tanzania country project fits into Component 1of the overall ASP-P1,andwill support: (a) clean up and disposal o f obsoletepesticides; (b) prevention ofobsoletepesticidesaccumulation; (c) capacity building for clean-up, disposal andprevention activities; and (d) project management andcoordination. Which safeguardpoliciesare triggered, ifany? Re$ PAD 0.6, TechnicalAnnex 10 Environmental Assessment (OP 4.1) andPestManagement (OP 4.09) apply to ASP-P1 which has beendesignateda Category "A" Project. Significant, non-standardconditions, if any, for: Re$ PAD C.7 Boardpresentation:None Covenantsapplicableto projectimplementation: Explicit releaseof Bank from liability for project activities inthe event of accident or other event causingharmor injury. Conditionsfor disbursementfor disposal (a) Complete a Country Project-specific Environment and Social Assessment (CESA), including an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) to the satisfaction of the Bank. Loadcrediteffectiveness:None - vii - A. STRATEGICCONTEXT AND RATIONALE 1. Countryand Sector Issues 1. Over the past forty years, many African countries, including Tanzania, have accumulated large quantities o f pesticides which have now become unfit for use or reformulation and are, therefore, obsolete. The amount o f publicly-held obsolete pesticides' currently stockpiled across the continent o f Africa, is estimated at 50,000 tons. Tanzania accounts for approximately 1,300 tons. These stocks will continue to present a threat to the global and local environment untilthey are safely removed anddestroyed. 2. Most African countries including Tanzania lack adequate technical, institutional and financial capacity to develop the policy and regulatory conditions necessary to properly manage the cleanup o f contaminated wasteshites, together with the destruction o f obsolete stocks o f pesticides. They also lack the capacity andmeans to implement soundprevention practices. 3. The Africa Stockpiles Programme - Project 1 (ASP-P1) follows the programmatic approach o f a horizontal Adaptable Program Loan (APL)2.The Global Environment Facility (GEF) endorsed the ASP-P1 on August 16, 2005. The Bank Board approved the ASP-P1 on September 8, 2005 for the first two Country Projects in the Programme, South Africa and Tunisia. Other "follow-on" projects (Tanzania, Mali, Morocco, and later Ethiopia) o f the APL will be circulated to the GEF Secretariat for approval on a no-objection basis, and to the Board, 10days before RegionalManagement final approval o f each grant3. 4. Tanzania has been selected for support under the ASP-P1 because it meets the following agreed upon ASP-PI readiness criteria: (a) ratified the Stockholm and Basel Conventions; (b) i s a priority country in terms o f the volume o f obsolete pesticides - approximately 1,300 tons; (c) has established a Project Coordination Team andcompleted an Operational Manualto implement the project; and(d) project finance has been secured for the project. 2. Rationalefor Bank Involvement 5. The Bank, as GEF Implementing Agent, will support the ASP-P1 according to its comparative advantage. The rationale for Bank involvement i s threefold: ' "Obsolete Pesticides" means products: (a) whose usage is prohibited or severely restricted for environmental or healthreasons; by applicable provisions o f the Basel Convention, the Stockholm Convention and the Rotterdam Convention, (the Conventions) andor national law consistent with the Conventions; or (b) that have deteriorated as a result o f improper or prolonged storage and can neitherbe usedinaccordance with label specifications nor easily reformulated for use; or (c) that cannot be usedfor their intendedpurpose, and cannot be easily modified to accomplish such purpose or some other purposes. ASP-P1 follows the model of the Multi-country HIV/AIDS Program for the Africa Region (MAP)andthe Multi- country Statistical Capacity BuildingProgram. Inaccordancewiththe usualAPLprocedures, approvalofthe remaining Country Projects would beprovidedat the Regional Vice President level inthe absence o f a request by at least three Executive Directors to have normal Boardpresentation. - 1 - the Bank as a GEF Implementing Agency has a responsibility to implement activities toward achievement o f GEF operational programs. By implementing ASP-P1 in Tanzania, together with the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Pesticides Action Network -United Kingdom (PAN-UK) and World Wildlife Fund(WWF), the Bank will support the first large scale GEF-funded activity toward achieving objectives o f the GEF OperationalProgram 14 (GEF Operational Program 14-0P14) for Reducing and Eliminating Releases o f Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs), and support the role o f GEF as the interim financing mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on POPs; the Bank has significant global experience in managing trust funds that mobilize the resources o f multiple donors for a shared purpose and in convening the complex partnership needed to successfully implement the Tanzania Country Project; and the Bank has unique expertise in managing complex, multi-country and regional programs. It has also developed considerable experience in facilitating the interface between Governments, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and the private sector. 6. Bank support to ASP-P1 is also fully consistent with the implementation o f the Bank's Environment Strategy, the key pillars o f that strategy being to improve people's quality o f life, quality o f economic growth and quality o f regional and global commons. One o f the key objectives in improving people's quality o f life i s protecting environmental health, which i s reflected inASP-Pl's approach. 3. HigherLevelObjectivesto which the ProjectContributes 7. In Tanzania, the ASP-P1 will support the following objectives of Tanzania Country Assistance Strategy (CAS), June 2000. ASP-P1 will assist Tanzania in realizing an environmentally sustainable rural development strategy and support commercial agriculture to be more dynamic and productive. The project will do this by reducing input costs from the use o f pesticides and by improving potential access to overseas markets through reduced use o f pesticide in agriculture. The project will also assist the Government in implementing policies aimed at the conservation o f natural resources and management o f the environment and raising awarenesson sustainable use o fnatural resources. 8. At the global level, ASP-P1 will contribute to the international efforts to eliminate persistent organic pollutants, improve management o f toxic chemicals and promote alternatives to pesticide usage that include IPM and Integrated Vector Management (IVM). ASP-P1 activities related to the disposal of obsolete pesticide will be a direct implementation o f the Stockholm Convention on POPs and the associated GEF Operational Program aiming to reduce the impact o f POPs on the global food chain, pollution o f transboundary waters, land and biodiversity. It will also contribute to the achievement o f the objectives o f other international agreements such as the Basel, Bamako, Rotterdam andBiological Diversity convention^.^ The fulltitles ofthe Conventionsto whichASP-P1 objectivescontributeare as follows: StockholmConventionon Persistent Organic Pollutants (2001); Basel Conventionon the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous - 2 - B. PROJECTDESCRIPTION 1. FinancingInstrument 9. The financing instrument i s a horizontal APL. This instrument was selected as it allows more advanced countries to proceed with project implementation after the signing o f grant agreements without having to wait until negotiations have been concluded with less advanced countries. 2. ProjectDevelopmentObjective and Key Indicators 10. TheASP-PI Project Development Objective is for selected African countries to eliminate inventoried, publicly-held, obsolete pesticide stockpiles and associated waste, and implement measures to reduce andprevent future relatedrisks. 11. The TanzaniaProjectDevelopmentObjectiveis to assist the Government o f Tanzania to dispose o f publicly-held obsolete pesticide stocks at priority selected sites and to support priority actions to help prevent the future accumulation o f new stocks o f obsolete pesticides. 12. The Tanzania Key Indicators are as follows: (a) Inventory database o f Publicly-held Obselete Pesticides stocks inplace andbeing used bythe PCT andthe Recipient's Government staff; (b) Completion o f CESA, and implementationo fmeasures contained therein; (c) Inventoried Publicly-held Obsolete Pesticides stocks disposed of, as a result o f the completion o f the Disposal Services contract(s) inaccordance with national and international laws and regulations; (d) Legal andregulatory framework for pesticides management improved, including measures to strengthen compliance with the Conventions; (e) IPMStrategy is developed andimplemented; and ( f ) The training program under Part D o fthe Project is implementedandthe knowledge so acquired i s being usedby the Recipient. 3. ProjectComponents 13. ASP-P1 has four components: (a) country operations; (b) technical support; (c) cross- cutting activities; and (d) project coordination. Each of these and especially the details o f the Wastes and their Disposal (1989); Bamako Convention on the Ban of the Import into Africa and the Control of TransboundaryMovement and Managementof Hazardous Wastes within Africa (1991); Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedures for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade (1998); andConvention onBiological Diversity (1992). - 3 - ASP-P1 Tanzania Project, which i s included under the Component "Country Operations", are described indetail inAnnex 4. The costs for ASP-P1 Tanzania Project are detailed inAnnex 5. ASP-P1 Component1: CountryOperations 14. This is the principal component o f the ASP-Ply encompassing a full range o f disposal, cleanup and prevention activities to achieve the Project objectives inthe participating countries; It will include four sub-components: (a) cleanup and disposal; (b) prevention o f obsolete pesticide accumulation; (c) capacity building; and (d) ASP-P 1management and monitoring. The costs for the overall ASP-P1 components are detailed inAnnex 4. 15. The costs for the ASP-P1 Tanzania Project are detailed in Annex 5. The Tanzania project includes the following components: ComponentA: Clean-up and Disposal (Total US$5.83million; GEF: US$5.48million) 16. This component will involve the disposal o f the identified or discovered quantities o f obsolete pesticides (approximately 1,300 tons already identified). The four sub-components include: (a) designing an obsolete pesticide data base, inventory and risk assessment for free standing pesticides, contaminated sites, soils, buried pesticides and contaminated equipment; (b) producing a country environment and social assessment(CESA); (c) safeguarding obsolete pesticide stocks; and (d) disposingo fthe identified, publicly-held, obsolete pesticides. Component B: Prevention of ObsoletePesticideAccumulation (Total US$0.28million; GEF: US$0.27million) 17. The aim o f this component is to prevent the re-occurrence o f the obsolete pesticide stockpiles and to promote alternative ways o f pest control. The prevention activities includes strengthening o f pesticide management through improvement o f pesticide registration, licensing, enforcement o f import controls, stock management, waste management, and formulation o f effective procurement strategies. This component will involve the following: (a) raising awareness o f ASP and obsolete pesticide disposal options; (b) reviewing and revising pesticide laws and regulations; and (c) producing andpilotingimplementation o f an IPMstrategy. - 4 - Component C: Capacity Building (Total US$O.lSmillion; GEF: US$0.14million) 18. This component will provide training and capacity building to Tanzania to implement the disposal, prevention and project management components. Approximately 14 training courses either have or will be provided to Government, farmers and the NGO sector. Training will be delivered by consultants hired bythe Project Coordination Team, the TSU, World Bank and Pan- UK. The training andcapacity buildingwill strengthen: (a) disposal activities including inventory, risk assessment, CESA and disposal; (b) prevention activities including pesticide legislation, management and IPM; and (c) project management andmonitoring and evaluation. Component D: Project Management and Monitoring (Total US$1.22million; GEF: US$0.99 million) 19. The aim o f this component is to support the overall management o f the project and to provide funding for monitoring that will ensure post project sustainability: (a) provide overall project management, monitoring andreporting; and (b) finance the PCT and the Project for effective implementation. ASP-P1 Component2: TechnicalSupport 20. This component will deliver to country Projects, including the Tanzania project, the highly technical and specialized expertise required for implementation, supervision and monitoring o f country level activities outlined under Component 1including: technical advice requested by the countries for the design and delivery o f training; production o f technical guidelines for cleanup and prevention operations; assistance in managing technical aspects of procurement and supervision o f specialized contractors; advice on linking countries with other specialized agencies and organizations; enhancement o f health and safety; assessment o f laboratory capacities; and oversight o f M&E. ASP-P1 Component3: Cross-CuttingActivities 21. This component will deliver knowledge management, awareness-raising, strategic studies and outreach services across the entire ASP-Ply including the Tanzania project, to capture synergies and cost savings through a coordinated multi-country, multi-partner approach. The key sub-components will include outreach to promote ratification o f conventions relevant to project objectives, buildingNGO's capacity, knowledge management and communication, e.g., hosting the ASP website. The strategic studies component will include an evaluation o f alternative technologies for the disposal o f obsolete pesticides. - 5 - ASP-P1 Component4: ProjectCoordination 22. This component will coordinate the implementation and monitoring o f the ASP-P1 among the various partners. In addition to the overall coordination, key activities include: developing and ensuring implementation o f a fund-raising strategy, acting as Secretariat to the Africa Stockpiles Programme Steering Committee (ASP-SC), maintaining awareness at the policy level about the Project, reporting to donors, preparing the bi-annual work plan and progress reports and financial reports, coordinating independent Project monitoring and coordinating the design o f follow-on projects. Initially, the Bank will host the ASP Project Coordination Unit (ASP- PCU). During the implementation phase o f ASP-P1 the PCU will be transferred to an appropriate African organization. NEPAD has been identified as a possible candidate. 4. LessonsLearnedandReflectedin the ProjectDesign 23. The project design incorporates lessons learned from a considerable body o f experience from (i) World Bank-supported obsolete pesticide stockpiles and waste cleanup interventions5 (ii) thantwelveyearsofinterventionsagainstrisksfromobsoletepesticidesinAfricaon more the part o f FAO, PAN-UK, the private sector and other ASP partners. It also reflects lessons learnt from programs under chemical conventions similar to the Stockholm Convention, the Bank's experience with regional programs and the Bank's Independent Evaluations Group (IEG) lessons on global partnerships. 24. Legal responsibility and custody of obsolete stocks: The project assumes that obsolete pesticide stocks are legally Government-owned until disposal is completed. The Grant Agreement provides that the Bank will have no responsibility for ownership, custody or care o f the stocks at any point during the inventory or disposal processes. Throughout the cleanup chain o f events, third parties (in particular the disposal contractor) may have temporary custody. The project will require such third parties to carry adequate insurance to accommodate possible mishap. 25. Country level ownership of the Project: The project emphasizes the importance o f strong country ownership, effective pesticide management, the reliance on technical expertise in waste management in the private sector, and engagement o f pesticide companies, environmental andpublic healthNGOs and other civil society participants. 26. Prevention: Recognizing that effective pesticide management and judicious use o f pesticides are essential to preventing risks associated with pesticide stockpiling. ASP-P1's design integrates substantial prevention and capacity building interventions early in the country operations. 27. Awareness: ASP-P1 also includes awareness-raising among the full range o f stakeholders inorder to support effective pesticide management andpreventionat the country level. 5 The Bank has considerable experience inclean up of waste sites, such as sludge, mine tailing and uranium clean up (e.g. Kyrgyzstan, Lithuania). However, the Bank has limited experience inthe cleanup ofdispersed pesticide waste. - 6 - 28. Monitoring and Evaluation: M&E functions are built into ASP-P1 both at the country and program levels, and cover not only the core clean-up and pesticide management activities but also all technical support, cross-cutting and coordination services (see Annex 6 for more details). 29. Large-scaleRegionalProject: A flexible approach to the implementation o f the ASP-P1 was found to be essential. Therefore, a horizontal APL model was followed with countries being selected for implementation as they meet readiness for implementation criteria. 5. AlternativesConsideredandReasonsfor Rejection 30. Several alternatives were considered for the design o f ASP-P1: (a) donors support individual parallel projects - This alternative would yield some short- term gains for the country clean-up operations, but it would not provide any o f the economies o f scale, synergies andvisibility that a regional program can offer; (b) create a regional pesticide management agency - to centralize the clean-up and prevention operations for the entire continent. This alternative was rejected because ultimately it would not be cost-effective and does not reflect the need for country ownership. Furthermore, both clients and donors are reluctant to create new regional bureaucracies; and (c) launch a 10-15 year adaptable program loan - that could expand as additional funding becomes available and build on the lessons from previous phases. As it was considered preferable to initiate the ASP immediately with a limited set o f fully- fundedcountries this option was rejected. C. IMPLEMENTATION 1. InstitutionalandImplementationArrangements 31. In line with Government policy, implementation of the Tanzania project has been mainstreamed into existing Government institutional arrangements as far as possible. Therefore, a Project Coordination Team (PCT) has been established to support and coordinate project implementation. 32. The Project Coordination Team will be hosted by the National Environment Management Council (NEMC), which serves as the project focal point and executing agency. NEMC was established in 1983 to perform an advisory role to the Government on all matters relating to environmental issues. The Project Coordination Team has been established and consists o f a Project Coordinator, a Prevention Coordinator, a Disposal Coordinator, two Field Managers and Technical Advisors. The Project Coordination Team will also engage staff from the Ministry o f Agriculture andFood Security Zonal Offices and the Agriculture Officers at regional and district administration levels, under the Ministry o f Local Government, to support project - 7 - implementation. It will also engage technical, short-term consultants and a short-term procurement specialist. 33. The Project Coordination Team, through the Director General o f NEMC, will report to a National Steering Committee (NSC) chaired by the Permanent Secretary inthe Vice President's Office. The NSC will approve work plans and budget and provide overall guidance for the country operation. It will, as a minimum comprise o f representatives from NEMC, the Ministry o f Agriculture and Food Security (MAFS), the Vice Presidents Office, the Chief Chemist, Occupational Health and Safety Organization, the Ministry o f Livestock Development, the Harbors Authority and the Tropical Pesticides Research Institute. A National Stakeholder Advisory Forum (SAF) will also be established to primarily coordinate the inputs and advice o f non-Government stakeholders including farmers, the private sector, andNGO's. 34. Outside o f the Tanzania Project, the overall ASP-P1 program institutional arrangements will be as follows: overall coordination and oversight will be provided by the ASP-PCU, to be established initially inthe World Bank andthen moving to an Afican organization like NEPAD. The partners include the FAO-hosted Technical Support Unit(TSU) which will provide technical support to Tanzania; the PAN-UK and WWF (Cross-cutting Management Entity) which will provide cross cutting support including program wide communications and support to NGO activities; andthe Bank which will be responsible for project supervision. A Steering Committee comprising o fkey partners will steer the overall ASP-P1. 2. FinancingPartners 35. Financing o f the Tanzania Project will include US$6.87 million from the GEF, US$390,000 inGovernment co-financing andUS$220,000 channeled through the FA0 from the Netherlands, Le., a total budget o f US$7.48 million. The TSU will be financed by the GEF (through FA0 as Implementing Agent for GEF, and the PCU will be financed through project funds managed bythe Bank (Le. principally DGFandthe Multi-Donor Trust Fund). 3. MonitoringandEvaluationof OutcomeResults 36. Monitoring o f Project activities and evaluation o f their results inASP-P1 will serve a dual function. First, it will facilitate tracking o f progress toward the Project objectives. Second, it will facilitate learning and generation o f knowledge necessary for the preparation o f follow-on country projects andthe further implementation o f ASP-P1. 37. Overall, ASP-P1 monitoring indicators are described in Section B2 and Annex 3. They reflect the Project focus on risk reduction from publicly-held obsolete pesticide stocks and contaminated sites. Data will come from two main sources: (a) individual country-level operations using standardized Project-wide methodologies for data collection and quality assurance, (b) inventories which will provide the baseline data and set the detailed program o f disposal operations for each o f the countries. M&E for disposal operations is straight forward as project implementation progress will be quantified through the pesticide inventories. The responsibility for data collection will rest with the PCT with assistance from the TSU. - 8 - 38. The Bank will monitor the implementation o f the Grant Agreements through routine supervision missions andreview o fM&Edata. 4. Sustainability andReplicability 39. A key factor to project sustainability is the prevention o f the re-emergence o f obsolete pesticide stockpiles. As detailed in Component B, the Tanzania Project activities will focus on preventing the re-accumulation o f pesticides. These activities include: supporting regulatory andpolicy reform, promoting alternative pest control strategies, such as IPM, supporting general public awareness on pesticide use and promoting the development and involvement o f local NGOs inpesticide safety and health risks. The ASP-P1 has been designed to include replication andthe preparationof follow-on projects 5. CriticalRisksandPossibleControversialAspects 40. While the clean-up and disposal o f obsolete pesticides is routinely undertaken safely, the ASP-P1 will be conducting removal operations in locations that are often dispersed, remote, and present unique logistical challenges. 41. Project implementation has been designed to operate through a partnership, which builds on the comparative advantages and experience o f several key agencies. However, successfilly managing the partnership adds W h e r complexity to the project. The ASP-P1 risk i s therefore rated as "substantial". 42. The table below summarizes the specific risks and describes the appropriate mitigation measures which have been adopted to minimize their impact: To Project Development/GEO S 0 Identifyand quantify all publicly-held obsolete pesticides ineachcountry at start- UP. Incorporate international standards and The seven countries participating safeguards into the implementationof all the in ASP-P1 fail to substantially clean-up and removal operations. reduce the threat posed by obsolete 0 Includesubstantial capacity building pesticides due to pesticides activities andtechnical support. M remaining on site or inadequate 0 Provide flexibility inproject implementation clean-up and disposal operations. to accommodate changing circumstances. 0 Ifoneor more ofthe country projects arenot fulfilling the programobjectives, ASP-P1 may acceleratethe implementationof ASP- P2 countries. - 9 - To IntermediateOutcomes or Component Outcomes S Providing substantial support on safeguard Component 1: Tanzania country issues. clean-up and disposal operations Continuous technical support to the country fail to meet the full extent o f projects from the TSU and international country requirements for various experts to ensure accuracy o f the inventory. reasons, including: BuildingGovernment implementation capacity and providing mechanisms for Failure to meet adequate close collaboration. safeguardrequirements. EngagingNGO's directly inproject Inventory i s inaccurate. implementation, especially inthe monitoring Lack o f Government o f clean-up and removal activities. S implementationcapacity Develop an effective public-disclosure andor support. strategy. Lack o fpublic support or Undertaking detailed pesticide inventories to oppositionby NGOs. identify the scale o fthe pesticides problem Inadequate resources due t and continuously seeking additional support the scale o f the pesticide and funding. problem. Ensuringgoodcoordination, collaboration The ASP partnership breaks and information exchange. Annual project down. performance reviews will be conducted to ensure the project remains on track and that issues are resolvedpromptly andjointly. Component 2: TSU becomes The TSU has been designed based on the overwhelmedby the demand for currently anticipated demand for services, but technical support services. the structure and resources will be reviewed M annually. Component 3: CCAME i s unable The CCAME will fully engage NGOs through to assureNGO community o f the appropriate communications. Also, the soundness o f project component activities have been divided between S implementation, especially WWF, PAN-UK and PAN-Africa to ensure disposal. adequate coverage at all levels. Component 4: Project The project coordination function has been coordinationbecomes ineffective developed in close collaboration with the due to inadequate cooperation partners and i s designed to foster and maintain a M among the ASP partners. healthy and active ASP partnership. - 10- To the OverallSuccess of the Project I S ~ ~ ~~ In Tanzania, project implementation will be supported by a mainstreamed PMT with in-kind Governments mayreduce the contributions from Government, which will priority of the obsolete pesticides ensure Government buy-in throughout the problemand may import and use program. Parallel efforts to strengthen policies, cheap and toxic pesticides, regulations and enforcement combined with (especially inemergencies, such as training inIPM techniques will also improve the locust outbreaks). success of the prevention campaigns. Furthermore, close dialogue with donors and cooperation with the pesticide industry will lead to greater transparency and responsibility. There i s reputationalrisk for the Ensuring that the environmental and social World Bank, GEF and the ASP safeguards are rigorously enforced. donors/partners, especially inthe Ensuring that emergency action plans are in case of an accident or the place for eachcountry. possibility of under-deliverydue to Carefully managing the shared relationships S project complexity and/or cost between governments, public agencies and the overruns private sector will reduce the risk o f accidents and ensure that any issues arising are resolved collectively. ~ M&E functions will identify specific risks as they arise. Highvisibility and disclosure of ASP Public oppositionto the project's activities will be maintained through the disposal options may delay coordinated involvement of all the partners and progress and result inpesticides stakeholders to ensure that methodologies are M continuing to be stockpiled. satisfactorily explained and that the overall project benefits remain clear and are adequately disseminated. The environmental risks are principally related to the clean-up, transport and disposal operations in each country. However, the project design Environmentalrisks - ASP-P1 has draws on a wealth o f experience from existing a Safeguard `Category A' rating projects in the region (e.g., Ethiopia) to define due to the toxic nature o fthe the methodologies to be used and the steps to be S obsoletepesticides beingremoved. taken to ensure that impacts are properly mitigated and will fully incorporate the latest and strictest standards for transporting toxic and hazardous wastes. OverallRiskRating - I S I [ =High S = Substantial M=Moderate - 11- 6. LoadcreditConditionsandCovenants 43. The Tanzania GEF Grant Agreement specifies that the Bank andthe Recipient agree on the following: at no point during the project will the Bank (a) be responsible for execution o f the project activities, (b) have any legal custody or responsibility for the pesticide stocks which are to be disposed o f during the course o f the project. This extra precaution is necessary to deal with the small risk o f a negligent disposal o f stocks by a disposal contractor which could harm people, property or cause damage to the environment. 7. Conditionsof Disbursementfor Disposal 44. Complete a country Project-specific Environment and Social Assessment (CESA), including an Environmental Management Plan(EMP) to the satisfaction o f the Bank. D. APPRAISAL SUMMARY 1. EconomicandFinancialAnalyses 45. The ASP-P1 Tanzania Project will essentially perform a public good inreducing the risk o f contaminating the environment. It, therefore, does not lend itself to a typical economic or financial analysis. However, for GEF purposes, the PAD includes an incremental cost analysis (Annex 9). This analysis provides a baseline and the incremental cost o f achieving global benefits to address the issue o f obsolete pesticides in the seven African ASP-P1 countries (Tunisia, SouthAfrica, Morocco, Mali, Tanzania, Nigeria andEthiopia). 2. Technical 46. The Tanzania project has prepared a country Operational Manual (OM) based on the ASP- P1 generic Operational Manual which spells out the technical, procurement, financial management (FM), M&E, Safeguard and implementation requirements. Inorder to design and implement the most appropriate disposal strategies at the country level, the detailed technical options will be prepared during project implementation once updated pesticide stockpile inventories have been completed. In principle, the technical design will be guided by a preference for cost-effective practices and compliance with international health, safety, and emission standards. The technologies selected for disposing o f the stockpiles and wastes will be required to meet both the Stockholm ConventionBest Available TechniquesBest Environmental Practice Guidelines, and the appropriate Basel Convention and Stockholm Convention Technical Guidelines for Environmentally Sound Management o f Chemicals. 47. To identify standards, the Project will refer to and follow the recommendations and minimum standards described inthe International Code o f Conduct on the Distribution and Use o f Pesticides (FAO, 2003), in the Stockholm Convention on persistent organic pollutants (dioxins and furans) and those related to the Basel Convention for Control o f Transboundary Movement o f Hazardous Waste, the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code, and the Rotterdam Convention for Prior Informed Consent. The ASP-P1 will conduct a rigorous - 12- analysis o f all available disposal technology schemes according to international standards for the industry, including additional criteria such as cost, safety, emissions, risks, etc. Inpractice, at least in the early stage o f the project, this i s expected to result in ASP-Pl's obsolete pesticide stocks and associated wastes being safeguarded and shipped overseas to be incinerated at high temperature in order to meet the above-mentioned requirements. Alternative disposal technologies will be identified for possible use at a later stage (see Annex 1, Section 2 for more details). 3. Fiduciary Financial Management 48. A financial management assessment was conducted o f the NEMC which will be responsible for project financial management. The project risk from a financial management perspective is considered as lowhegligible. A detailed Financial Management Manual has been prepared and approved by the Bank as part o f the Operational Manual. To ensure acceptable accounting and financial management standards, Tanzania will maintain separate project accounts and will open up a Special Account at a commercial bank on terms and conditions acceptable to the Bank. It will carry out annual audits and comply with international audit standards. Financial management and disbursement arrangements for the project (including financial reporting and FMR format) are described in the Tanzania Operational Manual and summarizedinAnnex 7. Procurement Arrangements 49. Based on the Procurement Capacity Assessment on file, the procurement risk i s rated as "high". The specific procurement arrangements are detailed in Annex 8 together with the eighteen-month procurement plan. 50. Procurement o f minor works to upgrade stores will use shoppingprocedures. 51. Goods will be procured to support disposal and prevention activities and will use national competitive bidding, shopping and direct contracting procedures. 52. Procurement o f disposaland relatedtransportservices for the obsolete pesticides will be the key project procurement activity. Pre-qualification of bidders will take place using a document based on that for works. 53. Consultant services will be important to the success o f the project and will support both disposal andprevention activities as well as project management. Selectionmethods will include quality-based selection, consultant qualifications, quality and cost-based selection, single source selection andindividual consultants. 54. The appropriate selection method for each consulting contract is recorded in the Procurement Plan according to the thresholds listed. - 13 - A summary Assessment of Agencies Capacities to implementprocurement is asfollows: (a) NEMC will establish a Project CoordinationTeam to support implementation of this project; (b) the office o fthe ChiefAccountant does procurement at NEMC. The Supplies Officer is responsible for carrying out the day-to-dayprocurement function but has limited procurement knowledge. There is also a need to improve NEMC filing and record keeping systems; and (c) the procurement specialist i s hired for the first 12months to assist NEMC inthe preparationo fbiddingdocuments, andRequest for Proposals, carry out evaluation of bids, prepare contracts documents, etc., and conduct handson training. 4. Social 55. As obsolete pesticides are removed from the environment, risks to human health and the environment will also be reduced. Prevention activities will prevent the build up o f obsolete pesticides and hence new risks to human health and the environment from arising. Awareness campaigns and training o f pesticide distributors and users will help to encourage safe pesticide handlingandalternative pest control methods. 5. Environment 56. ASP-P1is essentially an extensive cleanup and contamination-prevention operation which will bring substantial environmental health benefits, both locally and globally, by removing obsolete pesticide stockpiles in Tanzania. ASP-P1 does, however, carry some short-term high environmental risks related to the removal and transportation of obsolete pesticides and contaminated materials (see Annex 10). Therefore, during project implementation, a Tanzania project-specific Environment and Social Assessments (CESAs) including EMPs will be prepared by independent consultants as specified in the Operational Manual. Disposal and cleanup activities will be undertaken according to the requirements o f the CESA. - 14- 6. SafeguardPolicies SafeguardPoliciesTriggered by the Project Yes No EnvironmentalAssessment (OP/BP/GP 4.01) [XI [I Natural Habitats (OP/BP 4.04) [I [XI PestManagement(OP 4.09) [I Cultural Property (OP 11-03,beingrevised as OP 4.11) [XI [I [XI Involuntary Resettlement (OPBP 4.12) [I IndigenousPeoples (OD 4.20, beingrevisedas OP 4.10) E[I l [XI [XI Forests(OP/BP 4.36) [XI Safety of Dams (OP/BP 4.37) E l [XI ProjectsinDisputedAreas (OPBP/GP 7.60)6 [I [XI Projectson InternationalWaterways (OP/BP/GP 7.50) [I [XI 57. ASP-P1 required a Category A environmental assessment and triggers Operational Policies (OP) 4.01 on EA and 4.09 on Pest Management. The key safeguard issues are associated with potential environmental and social impacts from dealing with highly toxic chemicals and remediation o f contaminated sites. 58. The ASP environmental and social impacts were assessed in a Framework Environmental Assessment and their mitigation measures were outlined in an Environmental and Social Management Framework. The Environmental and Social Assessment Synthesis Report was prepared based on these documents and will serve as guidance for the preparation o f the respective CESA. The Environmental and Social Assessment Synthesis Report was disclosed prior to appraisal in Tanzania in March 2004 and in the InfoShop on March 17, 2004. The Project Integrated Safeguards Data Sheet (ISDS) was disclosed in October 26, 2005. The Environmental and Social Assessment Summary Report was disclosed to the Board on November 3rd, 2004. A bindingcovenant inthe Project legal document will be made, stating that the Government o f Tanzania will prepare a CESA early in Project implementation. Annex 10 discusses more specifically how ASP-P 1will ensure compliance with the safeguard policies. 59. Involuntary Resettlement(OP/BP 4.12) is not triggered at this stage. Given the multi- country nature o f the ASP-P1 Project (seven countries), it i s not feasible to prepare an umbrella framework for Project countries, due to their dissimilar legislation and policies related to land acquisition and displacement. Similarly, it is not practical and realistic to prepare a separate framework for each country, especially when there i s no confirmed evidence that existing pesticide sitedstorages will result in involuntary displacement or total or partial loss o f livelihood. 60. Natural Habitats (OP/BP 4.04): Duringproject implementation, if a stock o f obsolete pesticides, pesticide wastes or a contaminated site happen to be located in the proximity o f a critical natural habitat(s), then such a situation would trigger OP 4.04 and would require that the EAprocess (OP 4.01) would identify such habitats within a proposedproject's area o f influence Bysupporting the proposedproject, the Bank does not intendto prejudice the final determinationofthe parties' claims on the disputed areas. - 15- and will take the necessary measures to avoid or minimize damage to natural habitats to the extent feasible. 7. Policy ExceptionsandReadiness 61. Policy Exception: ASP-P1requires no Bankpolicy exceptions. Readiness Criteria: Fiduciary Tanzania indicates a highlevel o f compliance with financial management requirements. A procurement plans exists. 1 ProjectStaffing I Projectstaffidentified andinplace. I The Environmental and Social Assessment Synthesis Report Disclosure Requirements disclosed inthe countries andinthe Bank InfoShop as o f March 17,2004. Monitoringand M&Eindicatorshavebeenprepared andincorporatedinto the Evaluation project design and implementationarrangements. Co-Financing Agreements Signed Co-financing arrangements confirmed. - 16- ANNEXES ANNEX1: AFRICA STOCKPILES PROGRAMMEBACKGROUND Background 1. The ASP-P1 has been designed as a partnership comprising o f the Bank, countries (Ethiopia, Mali, Morocco, Nigeria, South Africa, Tanzania and Tunisia), key partners (FAO, WWF, PAN-UK and PAN-Africa, private sector, AfDB, NEPAD Secretariat), as well as UNEP, WHO, and other international organizations including the African Union, and the Secretariat o f the Basel Convention and the private sector. 2. The ASP has been designed to address the issue o f an estimated 50,000 tons of obsolete pesticides that are leaking into the environment, contaminating soil, water, air and food sources. These hazardous chemicals are an environmental health threat to the continent and to poor communities lacking safe water supplies and suffering from unsafe working conditions. Obsolete pesticide stockpiles exist in virtually all of the 53 countries of Africa. Within ASP a more specific sub-set of obsolete pesticides will be removed. They are known as Persistent Organics Pollutants (POPS)~.They pose the most serious, long-term danger to humanhealth and the environment because o f their mobility, toxicity, bio-accumulation potential, and persistence. Obsolete pesticides are generally a mixture o f different pesticides, some o f which are POPs, and fall under the Stockholm Convention on POPs to which all seven participating ASP-P1 countries are party. 3. Many African countries lack adequate technical, institutional and financial capacity to deal with these pesticides. This requires the implementation o f regulations, enforcement and resources to manage the cleanup o f contaminated wastes/sites and the destruction o f obsolete pesticide stocks in an environmentally sound manner. They also suffer from weak import controls, inadequate storage and stock management and a lack o f training and education on appropriate pesticide use, all o f which contribute to the widespread misuse o f pesticides. Lastly, there i s also a lack o fpublic awareness o fthe environmental healthrisks posed by POPs. 4. The criteria for selecting countries to participate in ASP-P1 included: (a) ratification of the Stockholm Convention, which is a condition for accessing GEF financing; (b) ratification o f the Basel Convention for shipment o f waste and, preferably, the ratification o f the Rotterdam Convention; (c) readiness to implement acceptable removal andprevention measures; and (d) the availability o f adequate financing. POPs are chemical substances that persist inthe environment, bioaccumulate through the food chain, and pose a risk of causing adverse effects to human health and the environment. POPs based pesticides include: Aldrin, Dieldrin, Endrin, Chlordane, Heptachlor, DDT, Mirex, Hexachlorobenzene and Toxaphene. - 1 7 - Main Sector Issuesto be addressedbyASP 5. Obsolete Pesticide Disposal and Management: ASP will support the identification, removal, transportation and safe disposal o f obsolete pesticides and heavily contaminated soils and associated materials. There are currently no suitable facilities in Africa for the environmentally sound destruction o f pesticides that meet the requirements o f the Base1 Convention and the Stockholm Convention. Hence, ASP will necessarily facilitate the disposal o f the waste at dedicated facilities outside Africa. The project will also assess alternative destruction technologies which may be applied throughout the African continent inthe future. 6. Technical Options: Several technology options are available for the disposal o f hazardous wastes, such as obsolete pesticides. However, the number o f technology options which are tried and tested and considered safe at all levels, including environmentally and economically, are relatively few. The ASP has, therefore, committed to choosing the disposal contractors for its first project through a call for qualified firms based on the highest international standards for disposal o f hazardous wastes. These standards will encompass a varied set o f factors ensuring, inter alia, experience in the developing country context, meeting international emissions and other environmental standards, and a proven track record in safe handling and transport o f hazardous waste in compliance with international conventions. The cost- effectiveness o f the offers will also be considered provided they are within the parameters established by the standards for disposal. A list o f qualified firms will then be established and tenders will be offered among this pre-qualified group. By utilizing this "standards" approach, the ASP allows for the broadest range o f disposal options to be considered (e.g., plasma arc, high temperature incineration, etc.) rather than prejudging the available market, while ensuring that environmental safeguards are fully met. Inaddition, the ASP will fund a study (managed by the CCAME) in the first phase o f the program to analyze the range o f disposal options available to ensure the broadest selection o f acceptable technologies insubsequent phases o f the program. 7. ContaminatedSoils: The highrisks for humanhealth (e.g., cancers and birth defects) and the environment (e.g., contamination o f water tables and streams) resulting from soils contaminated with pesticides, are well identified in some countries, e.g., in Mali. ASP-P1 will not commit to extensive remediation o f pesticide-contaminated soils, other than in exceptionally high-risk situations due to the high costs and large quantities involved. However, the final decision inall cases would be site-specific and would depend inpart on a clear understanding o f site-specific risk assessments, the technological options available (e.g., containment or in-situ treatment), their feasibility andrelative costs. 8. Contaminateddrumswill be cleaned andrecycledandor re-used where appropriate and the disposal o f buriedpesticideswill be investigatedinsome countries. Preventionof accumulationof new stockpilesof obsolete pesticides 9. Pesticide Regulations: Improved pesticide regulations to ensure effective use and to facilitate international trade in agricultural produce are essential. Many African countries have regulations in place, but these are often either inadequate or not enforced. Furthermore, - 18- regulations may be in place for agricultural purposes but not for public health (e.g., mosquito control campaigns and pesticides for domestic use). ASP will help countries to review and improve their regulatory systems, including ensuring their compliance with international conventions. 10. PesticideProcurement, Production and Imports: Inadequate procurement strategies on the part o f Governments, national agencies, donor agencies, development organizations, the private sector and other organizations are the principal cause o f stockpiles o f obsolete pesticides, often resulting in oversupply, stocking o f unsuitable products, late delivery o f products, and supply in inappropriate containers. ASP will utilize stakeholder committees to identify ways o f eliminating supply-driven pesticide procurement. Inaddition, the active involvement o f donors and the pesticide industry inthe ASP partnership will also help to prevent oversupply. 11. Pesticide Supply, Distribution and Use: Inadequate management o f various components o fthe pesticide life cycle has contributed to the creation o f obsolete stocks. There i s a need to improve management o f pesticides from the point o f supply to the point o f use and beyond, in terms o f empty container and unused pesticide disposal. The ASP will provide governments with comprehensive guidance on strategies for the appropriate management o f pesticide distribution, including information on international laws andbest practice. 12. Pest Management in Crop Production: Heavy reliance on external inputs for crop production i s a contributing factor to the creation o f obsolete pesticide stocks. ASP will collaborate and coordinate its activities with the numerous agencies (e.g., FA0 IPM Facility, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), International Centre o f Insect Physiology and Ecology) promoting the development and implementation o f IPM strategies that reduce reliance on external inputs such as pesticides. 13. Control of Migratory Pests: A major source o f pesticide accumulation has been through emergency donations for the control o f locust invasions and the inappropriate management o f such stocks. ASP will help bring together donors and specialized international agencies (e.g., FA0 Locust Program) in order to address this problem. It will also coordinate activities with the current Africa Emergency Locust Project. Coordination between the two projects will initially be most prevalent in Mali (the only country currently participating inboth projects). The Africa Emergency Locust Project will also contribute to the regional knowledge as well as contributing to a key cross-cutting study under CCAME envisioned for ASP-P1 . 14. Pest Management in Animal Health: Inthe second part o f the 20thcentury, livestock owners inEast and South Afiica relied on "dipping" to control tick-borne diseases. This practice is slowly being replaced by non-dipping technologies, but numerous contaminated sites are found throughout rural Africa. Cleanup o f these sites i s not part o fASP-P1 . 15. Pest Managementin Public Health, Structural and IndustrialUses: Pesticides are also used inpublic health (e.g., DDT for malaria vector control), for the protection o f buildings, roads, power lines and other structures, and inindustry for the protection o f materials from pest attack. ASP will involve bodies responsible for the regulation, supply and use o f pesticides as stakeholders innational forums addressing obsolete pesticides. - 19- 16. Stakeholder Involvement: ASP aims to ensure that stakeholders are appropriately included in all relevant processes related to ASP-supported activities. To that end, one o f the criteria which countries must meet inorder to engage with the ASP is demonstrable stakeholder involvement and the creation of stakeholder forums for the guidance of ASP country projects. - 20 - ANNEX2: MAJOR RELATED PROJECTSFINANCED THE BANKAND/OR OTHERAGENCIES BY BankOperations 1. The following table summarizes relatedBankProjects. Implementation Progress: - Mali: Buildingcapacity for pesticide Satisfactory. Agricultural Services and management including obsolete Producer Organizations Project pesticide inventories and cleanup for Development Objective: (P035630) -ongoing. disposal US$617,000. Satisfactory. Honduras: Groundwater and breast milktesting UrgentTracking andDisposal incontaminated areas. Inventory o f Hazardous Materials and removal o f 104 tons o f obsolete FundedwithUS$730,000 pesticides and other toxic waste, through the DutchTrust Fund includingPOPS,following Hurricane Notrated. (TF02 1813) Mitch. Also awarenessraising, April 1999-August 2000 C1osed. capacity buildingandpublic information campaigns. Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Reducingthe hardships imposed on Mauritania, Niger. Senegal, people and the environment from The Gambia: current and future locust invasions. Africa Emergency Locust The project includes emergency Project-(P092473) -on-going. locust management; emergency Satisfactory. agriculture investments; and establishing early warning and responsesystems in7 countries for a total project cost of US$73.0 million. -21 - RelatedOperations 2. The following table summarizes the related cleanup andpreventionprojects implemented byagencies other thanthe Bank. PA0 Manage EthiopiaPesticide DisposalProject Awareness raisingworkshops on obsolete hitiatelcoordinate national inventories o f pesticides inaffected countries and obsolete pesticide stockpiles. regions. Guidelines on prevention and Initiate/formulate disposal projects for management of obsolete pesticides. FA0member countries. Guidance and support for prevention Supervise/monitor/followup disposal and programs and strategiesinFA0 member preventionoperations inEthiopia. countries. Removal and disposal o f obsolete Global IPMFacility; InternationalCode of pesticides from Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Conduct on the Distribution and Use o f Seychelles, Yemen, and Zambia. Engage Pesticides; Pesticides Management donors inaction to resolve obsolete Programme; Joint Secretariat of the pesticide problems. Rotterdam Convention on Prior Informed Consent (PIC); advice and support on pesticide regulation; regional programs on pesticides registration, e.g., ComitC Permanent Inter Etat de Luttecontre la SCcheresse(CESS), Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management o f Chemicals (IOMC) member and co chair of IOMC working group on obsolete pesticides. WHO Awareness raisingthrough the WHO/ InternationalProgramme on Chemical None. Safety (IPCS). Epidemiology ofpesticides Poisoning Project on healthimpact o f pesticides and the IPCS INTOX Project. LJNEPChemicals Inventories RussianFederation. Financial support for FA0work inLatin Stockholm Convention Secretariat. America. Awarenessraising. IOMC participation. PartnershipinSecretariat o f Rotterdam convention. `Demonstrating Cost-effective and JNEP/wHO Sustainability of Environmentally Sound GEFfunded, mdLocally Appropriate Alternatives to Jouncil None. DDT for Malaria Control on Africa" - ipproved2005) Regional (Ethiopia, Eritrea, Madagascar, Yamibia, South Afnca). JNEP/ FA0 `ReducingDependence onPOPSandother GEFfunded, 4gro-Chemicals inthe Senegal andNiger Zouncil None. River Basins through Integrated Fproved2005) ?reduction. Pest and Pollution - 22 - CLEANUPOR DISPOSAL PREVENTIONOR CAPACITY ACTMTIES BUILDINGAND AWARENESS ACTMTIES Management" -Regional (Benin,Guinea, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Senegal). UNIDO- Ethiopia,Nigeria Tanzania, UNEP- None. Support of NIP National Coordinators to Morocco, South strengthenlinkswithNIP process. Africa and Tunisia African 603 tons (Namibia, South Africa, Improvedpesticides regulation, IPM Countries Swaziland). Ethiopia-significant programs, reform of pesticide supply (South Africa, involvement and contribution "in kind"in systems, engagement with international Botswanaand disposal project management. forums, e.g., Conventions, others) Sub-regional initiatives, e.g., CILSS pesticide registrationprogram. DANIDA Mozambique disposal facility investigated. None, Danish Cooperation for Southern African Development Environment and None. Coordination inventory. Development Finnish Department for Nicaragua 1998 -carriedout byEkokem International (Finnishdisposal company). None. Development Corporation GTZ Over 850 tons pesticide inMadagascar, Mauritania, Mozambique, Niger, and None. Zambia. Netherlands Funded FA0 obsolete pesticides program since 1994. Fundednational disposal programs inCape Verde, Ethiopia, Support to the Global IPM Mauritania, Senegal, Seychelles, Tanzania Facility. - Zanzibar,Yemen, andZambia. Funded detailed inventory inTanzania. USAID/ us Environmental Contributedto disposal inEthiopia, Niger, Awareness raising and training for Protection andSenegal. inventory taking. Agency CLI Financial support for destruction of stocks proven to be supplied by CLImember Technical Assistance (TA). companies. -23 - CITY NESS UNIDO DemonstrationProject onnon-combustion None. POPs destruction technology (Nigeria); Knowledge Sharing workshop on POPs for African NGOs (Arusha-Tanzania). Secretariat TA for the undertaking ofthe national Guidance on transboundary movement of Base1 inventory o f obsolete pesticides in obsolete pesticides. Technical guidelines Convention Mauritius. on environmentally soundmanagement o f POPs (drafting stage). Awareness raising, policy making and training workshops. PAN-UK Independent monitoring o f Ethiopian Obsolete Pesticides Project. Promotionof safe alternatives to pesticide Engagement o f Organization for Economic use. Guidance/awarenessraising on health Cooperation and Development (OECD) and environmental impact ofpesticides. Pesticides Forum on obsolete pesticides Training o f local NGOs inmonitoring, issues. Capacity buildingfor NGOs in disposal and prevention. Lobbying for developingcountries. Contribution to Implementationof Conventions (e.g., on awarenessraising indevelopingcountries POPs and Rotterdam Convention). and among donors. PAN-Africa Publications and awarenessraising Guidance/awarenessraising across Africa PAN-UK, Safe Environment Group and on healtldenvironmental impact of PAN-Africa liaise to develop regional, pesticides. Lobbying for implementation networkedNGOcapacity inaddition to of Conventions (e.g., Stockholm specific in-country capacity-building Convention on POPs and Rotterdam programs. Convention). Conferences and meetings on stockpiles in West African region. WWF Engagement with Governments and NGOs Awareness-raising on issue o f toxins and on the implementationof the Stockholm TA. Convention; Global Toxics Program. - 24 - ANNEX3: RESULTSFRAMEWORK MONITORING AND ResultsFrameworkfor overallASP-P1 Outcome Indicators Use of OutcomeInformation GEO Reduce the quantity o f POPs materials inAfrica that could potentially leak and damage ecosystemslocally and globally. PDO Elimination of publicly-held Inventoriedpublicly-held Outcome information will be obsolete pesticide stockpiles and obsolete pesticide stockpiles in6 utilized for the design of the associatedwaste and reduction o f ASP-P1 countries eliminated' subsequent phases o f the Africa future relatedrisks. (Goal = 100%removed). Stockpiles Programme (ASP-P2, etc.) untilall obsolete pesticide Reduce risks to health and Quantity of new publicly-held stocks have beenremoved from ecosystems from accidental leaks obsolete pesticide stockpiles Africa. o f POPs by helpingselected (Goal = 0 stockpiles). African countries eliminate Outcome informationwill also inventoriesof stockpiles of bevery usefulfor developing publicly-held pesticides and their No further accumulation of similar multi-partner, multi- associatedwaste and to help publicly-held obsolete pesticide country projects inother regions. them avoid accumulating such stocks stockpiles inthe future. (Goal = 0 additional stockpiles). 'Initial ~~~ ~ estimates have beenprovidedby FA0 and the countries which will be finalized as the first step of each countryproject within approximately the first 12months of implementation. - 25 - Component1: Obsolete pesticide stocks An inventory database inplace in Will define specific ASP-P1 identified accurately and 7 ASP countries, accepted bythe disposal activities and will be disposed and prevention ASP partnership and being used used for future management o f measures put inplace. and updatedby Government stocks. staff. Incase ofaccident, emergency plans successfully implemented. Disposal contract completed in6 ASP countries inline with national and international regulations. Quantity o f accumulation o fnew obsolete pesticide stockpiles minimized (Goal = 0 additional stockpiles). Government adopts International Code o f Conduct on Pesticide Distribution and Use.g Component 2: Effective TA provided for TSU fully funded and staffed by Annually: Feedback on the implementationo fproject at the end o f year 1. efficacy o f TSU services. country level. Client satisfaction as determined Year 2- 4: Informscope o f future by survey. TSU support. Preparation activities for ASP-P2 countries complete -national programs identified, selection conditions met, country counterparts inplace and funding secured. The International Code of Conduct covers issues such as the labeling, tracking and licensing of pesticides. - 26 - Component3: Capacity buildingfor countries Strategic studies delivered, e.g., Contribute to design of future and cross-cutting for alternative disposal technologies project components and involvement ofNGOs and locust control issues assessed activities. implementedeffectively. and adopted ifASP standards met. Annually: Feedback on the efficacy of the CCAME services. NGOparticipationinproject activities inall ASP-P1 countries participating inat least two of the following: awarenessraising, monitoring, capacity building and communication. Communication strategy implemented. Component4: Effective coordination of all Monitoring reports delivered Annually: Feedback on the program components. with sufficient data on timeto efficacy of the ASP-PCU GEF, donors and the Bank. services. ASP-PCU movingto African Mid-term: Informpreparationof organization within ASP-P1. follow-on projects and scope o f future ASP-PCU support. Indicators Specific to the Tanzania Country Project To track progress towards the desired outcomes o f the ASP-P1 component (Country Operations), specific indicators have been developed for the Tanzania Country Project as follows: Inventory database o f Publicly-held Obsolete Pesticides stocks inplace andbeingused bythe PCT andthe Recipient's Government staff; Completion o f CESA, andimplementationo fmeasures contained therein; Inventoried Publicly-held Obsolete Pesticides stocks disposed of, as a result o f the completion o f the Disposal Services contract(s) inaccordance with national and international laws andregulations; Legal andregulatory framework for pesticides management improved, including measures to strengthen compliance with the Conventions; IPMStrategy is developedandimplemented; and The training program under Part D o f the Project is implemented andthe knowledge so acquired is being usedby the Recipient. - 2 7 - The Technical Support Unit hosted by the FA0 (ASP-P1 component 2) is currently developing, under Word Bank supervision, a result framework for all country operations. The framework will include the key outcome indicators, annual targets, baseline situation, source o f data, frequency of data collection, the strategic use o fthe data and entityresponsible for collecting andreporting the data. The result framework will be finalized duringthe Tanzania project launch and included inthe Project Operationalmanual. - 28 - 0 9 3 cd 0 0$1 0$1 I 0 $1 ( $01 X 0d 0 VI 0 0m 0 b 0 0 0 0 0 u 5 2 ?A 5e;la a 4 B 52 ?A 4 2b ?A 4 a B 0 E: 0 E: 0E: 0E: 0 E: m 00 I 0 m 0 E: m 0 0 m I 00 0 d m 00 00 k 0 $e4 2 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 m U, 00 d $ - k 0 E: 0 m c.l 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ a e! 8 a B I & 2 .3 a B e! 8 Ecd ANNEX4: DETAILEDPROJECT DESCRIPTION Background 1. Overall, ASP-P1 consists o f four components: (1) country operations; (2) technical support; (3) cross-cutting activities; and (4) project coordination all described below. The Tanzania project is located in Component 1. Components 2, 3 and 4 will support the seven-country ASP-P1,including Tanzania and are described below. ASP-P1 Component 1: Country Operations (Total: US$51.37 million; GEF: US$21.74 millionfor the overallASP-Pl). 2. This is the principal component o f the ASP-Ply encompassing a full range o f disposal, cleanup and prevention activities to achieve the Project objectives in the participating countries.The Country Operations for Tanzania (Total US$7.48 million; GEF: US$6.87 million) includes four sub-components: (a) Country Cleanup and Disposal; (b) Prevention o fAccumulation; (c) Capacity Building; and (d) Country Project Management andMonitoring Component A: Clean-up and Disposal (Total US$5.83;GEF: US$5.48million). 3. This sub-component will involve the disposal o f the identified or discovered quantities o f obsolete pesticides (approximately 1,300 tons already identified). It will include a number o f important activities: (a) designing an obsolete pesticide data base, inventory and risk assessment including free-standing pesticides, contaminated sites, soils, buried pesticides andcontaminated equipment; (b) producing a country environment and social assessment (CESA); (c) safeguarding of obsolete pesticide stocks; and (d) disposing o f the identified, Publicly-held Obsolete Pesticides (free- standing, obsolete pesticides, and contaminated or POP'S related contaminated veterinary products and cleaning o f contaminated containers and equipment. Component B: Prevention of ObsoletePesticidesAccumulation (Total US$0.28 million; GEF: US$0.27million). - 3 1 - 4. The aim o f this sub-component is to prevent the re-occurrence o f the obsolete pesticide stockpiles and promoting alternative ways o f pest control. The prevention activities includes strengthening o f pesticide management through improvement o f pesticide registration, licensing, enforcement o f import controls, stock management, waste management, and formulation o f effective procurement strategies. Prevention activities will also include awareness and training for pesticide distributors, users and others to encourage safe pesticide handling and alternative pest control. This sub- component will involve the following activities: (a) raising awareness o f ASP and disposal options; (b) reviewing andrevising pesticide laws andregulations; and (c) producing andpiloting implementationo f an integrated pest management (IPM) strategy. Component C: Capaciiy Building (Total US$O.l5million; GEF: US$O.l4million). 5. This component will provide training and capacity building to Tanzania to implement the disposal, prevention, and project management components. Approximately 14 training courses either have or will be provided to Government, farmers and the NGO sector. Training will be provided by Project Coordination Team managed consultants, the TSU, World Bank and PAN-UK. The training and capacity buildingwill strengthen: (a) inventory design, risk assessment, CESA and disposal operations; (b) prevention activities including pesticide legal reform, pesticide management and PM;and (c) project management andmonitoring and evaluation. Component D: Project Management andMonitoring (Total USU.22 million; GEF: US$0.99 million). 6. The aim o f this sub-component is to support the overall management o f the project and to provide for monitoring that will ensure post project sustainability: (a) provide overall project management monitoring and reporting; and (b) finance the PCT andproject for effective implementation. ASP-P1 Component 2: Technical Support (Total: US$4.31 million; GEF: US$4.31 million for the overall ASP-Pl). 7. The aim o f this component is to provide technical and monitoring support to the seven country projects under Component 1. The FAO-hosted TSU will coordinate and provide technical input to country projects, assure the technical quality of Country - 32 - Projects and consolidate M&E data. The TSU will operate under the supervision o f FA0 incompliancewith the rules andprocedures ofFAO. 8. The TSU will liaise directly with the country PCT and closely with the Bank as per agreed work plans to ensure that the technical assistance needs of countries are met in a timely and efficient manner. The TSU will report on its progress and work plan to the ASP-PCU which inturn will consolidate activity reports for transmission to ASP donors andthe ASP-Steering Committee. Becausethe Bankis responsible for the supervisiono f all GEF ASP country grants, the TSU and the Bank will work closely together to support countries. 9. This component has four sub-components: provide technical assistance to countries in the development of the Country Operational Manuals and the completion o f preparatory activities related to training and capacity building; provide technical assistance to the six countries to implement disposal operations; provide technical assistance to seven countries to build their capacity to prevent re-occurrence o fthe obsolete pesticide problem; and provide overall country M&E o f country performance against agreed technical standards. Sub-Component1:Preparation of Country Operational Manuals 10. This sub-component will support the seven countries to prepare Country OperationalManuals required for negotiations andto implement the project. Sub-component2: TechnicalAssistanceto Countries 11, This sub-component will coordinate delivery o f a range o f services to support the preparation o f country operations to dispose o f obsolete pesticides and will include the following activities: support the design o f strategies for the effective and safe disposal o f obsolete pesticide stocks andassociatedwaste, health andsafety plans; support the development o f obsolete pesticide inventories by providing training, material, informationandtechnical support for fieldactivities; support the development o fthe CESAs includingthe Ems; contract preparation - the TSU will as soon after negotiations as possible support countries in preparing technical specifications and carrying out technical evaluations for project managers, consultants and contractors for - 33 - obsolete pesticide prevention and disposal activities. The Bank's fiduciary responsibilities willnotbe&ged inthisregard; and (e) advise on alternative disposal options, targeted to specific' country or site conditions. Sub-component 2: Prevention of Accumulation 12. The prevention sub-component will coordinate delivery o f a range o f services that are required to support country prevention activities. It will include the following activities: (a) support legislative andregulatory reforms to enhancepesticidemanagement; (b) support the identification of weaknesses inthe enforcement of legislation and enhance enforcement measures; (c) support the design o f enhanced pest management strategies to improve efficiencies andto reducerelianceonpesticides invarious sectors; and (d) support the design and implementation of appropriate container management strategies. Sub-component 4: Monitoring and Evaluation of Country Implementation 13. The activities under this sub-component include: (a) support country project launch workshops and supervision support with the Bankat least twice perannum; (b) support countries to implement the detailed M&E System and Enquiry System; (c) support annual workshops for the PCTs on lessons learned; and (d) support TSU Management, including overall coordination with other ASP units, administration o f TSU activities, including procurement, reporting and financial administration. ASP-P1 Component 3: Cross-Cutting Activities Management Entity (CCAME) (Total: US$2.44 million;GEF: US$O for the overallASP-Pl). 14. The objective o f this component is to support overall ASP-P1 knowledge management, buildthe capacity o f local NGOs inpesticide-related matters and to identify alternative disposal technology and practices. This component will be implemented by WWF andPAN-UK. It comprises three sub-components: - 34 - (a) communications and knowledge management; (b) NGOcapacity building; and (c) strategic studies. 15. The original plan to include a Competitive Grants component i s not currently funded, but may be prepared and included in ASP-P2 programming as additional funds become available. Sub-component 1:Communications and Knowledge Management 16. The sub-component will coordinate a number o f cross-cutting activities, required for the success of the ASP. The activities include: communications: the communication strategy will be further defined during project implementation. It will include the design and distribution of ASP folders/documents, managing the ASP website and a media outreach service (e.g., field visits for journalists, information dissemination campaigns). The Bank will also provide media outreach and communications support to WWF due to its global reach; knowledge management: acknowledge andinformationmanagement system will be designed and implemented to store and retrieve key documents and information; treaty ratification and coordination with chemical convention activities (in addition to POPSdestruction options): Countries which have not yet signed or ratified the Stockholm Convention will be supported to do so. This is required bythe GEF as a condition for country participation inASP. Countries will also be supported financially to ratify the Rotterdam, Basel, and Bamako Conventions. This activity will also support coordination with related chemical convention issues including: National POP'S Inventory (NIP'S)coordination, Prior Informed Consent (PIC) information exchange and trans-boundary movement o fwaste issues; and private sector funding: WWF will solicit private sector financial support for ASP incooperationwiththeBankandFAO. Sub-component 2: NGO Capacity Building (PAN-UK). 17. PAN-UK will lead these efforts in close coordination with PAN-Africa and WWF. The activities will include: (a) NGOcapacity building: NGOcapacity to address pesticide management issues will be built through sharing lessons learnt at workshops, networking and coordination o fNGOactivities; - 35 - (b) preparing and disseminating operational guidelines for NGO involvement and traininginASP; and (c) designing and implementing awareness raising activities and outreach program targetedat key stakeholders. Sub-component 3: Strategic Studies (mF). 18. The sub-component will include preparation o f strategic studies in close collaboration with regional partners on topics common to the entire project, such as environmentally sustainable locust control and the safe maintenance o f emergency pesticide stocks for the control of locust outbreaks, malaria, dengue fever and other pest- vector diseases. Activities will include: (a) identifying alternative disposal technologies for obsolete pesticides and remediationo f contaminated soils andwater resources; and (b) identifjmg environmentally sound locust control strategies and the safe maintenance o f emergency pesticide stocks for the control o f locust outbreaks, malaria, dengue fever, andother vector-born diseases. ASP-P1 Component 4: Project Coordination (Total: US$2.44 million; GEF: US$O for the overall ASP). 19. The objective o f this component is to ensure overall coordination o f the ASP-P1 including the other three components and their activities. The ASP-PCU will initiallybe hosted by the Bank. It is anticipated that following the successful completion o f ASP-P1, or earlier, the ASP-PCU will be transferred to an African organization. NEPAD has been identified as a potential host. The Bank i s currently channeling DGF fundingthrough the Development Bank o f Southern Africa (since DBSA hosts NEPAD in their offices) for capacity building activities o f NEPAD. The three components o f the ASP-PCU include the following: Sub-Component 1: Governance and Coordination 20. The ASP-PCU will be responsible for supporting the overall governance arrangements o f the ASP including the ASP- Steering Committee (ASP-SC. In addition, the ASP-PCU will coordinate the efforts o f the partners to design subsequent ASP projects. The main activities under this sub-component will include: - 36 - (a) providing secretarialsupport for the ASP-SC; (b) coordinatingpreparationforASP-P2; (c) ensuring effective management o f ASP financial resources and maintaining an audit regime incooperation withthe Bank;and (d) promotingASP andliaisingwithdonors andrecipient countries. Sub-component 2: Project Monitoring and Evaluation 21. The ASP-PCU will establish and implement the overall ASP M&E system in order to ensure that the Project i s successfully implementedto achieve the PDO and those resources are being used efficiently and effectively. It will do this through consolidating individual FMRs and monitoring project progress against the project Results Framework and each component against its overall project Results Framework andWorkplan. Itwill provide bi-annually consolidated ASP progress reports and work plans with recommendations to the ASP-SC andto donors andpartners for information. Sub-component 3: ASP-PCU Management 22. The ASP-PCU, hosted by NEPAD, will support overall project coordination. The ASP-PCU will produce a bi-annual work plan and project progress report supported by a project FMR for the ASP-SC, and all other partners. The report will be based on the inputs provided from the various partners. - 37 - ANNEX 5: PROJECTCOSTS Projectcost by Local Foreign Total component (US$ million) (US$ million) (US$ million) 0.33 5.83 I Prevention Disposal I 5.50 0.10 I 0.17 I 0.28 I Capacitybuilding 0.05 0.10 0.15 Projectmanagement 1.oo 0.26 1.22 Total 1.48 6.03 7.48 category (US$ million) (US$ million) (US$ million) Goods 0.20 0.64 0.84 Works 0.13 0.10 0.23 Disposalservices 0.24 2.80 3.04 andtransport Consultants 0.10 0.54 0.64 Training and 0.11 0.30 0.41 workshops Operatingcosts 0.59 0.50 1.09 Unallocated 0.12 0.50 0.62 Total 1.49 5.38 6.87 - 38 - ANNEX6: IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS Background 1. ASP-P1 institutional and implementation arrangements rely on close cooperation between the ASP partners. Overall coordination o f the ASP will be the responsibility of the ASP-PCU. The country PCTs are responsible for implementation o f component one. The TSU (hosted by FAO), and CCAME (hosted by WWFPAN-UK) will support the countries in implementation through providing, inter alia, technical assistance, support for prevention activities and information dissemination. Overall coordination and oversight will be provided by the ASP-PCU, to be established initially in the World Bank and then moving to an African organization. (NEPAD i s receiving DGF funds to build its capacity as a candidate). The ASP Unitat the World Bankprovides continuous management ofproject activities andsupervisionof funds. 2. These arrangements are based on the comparative advantage o f each partner andresponds to the need to: (a) ensure country implementation capacity and ownership; (b) technical support for country project implementation; (c) sound communication andNGO support; (d) coordinated and effective implementation between the partners; and (e) effective supervision and management o f donor funds. ImplementationandInstitutionalArrangementsfor the TanzaniaCountryOperation 3. In Tanzania a Project Coordination Team (PCT) will support and coordinate project implementation. Inkeeping with Government efforts to mainstream project implementation into existing Government structures, the PCT will primarily comprise o f seconded Government staff. The PCT will be located in NEMC and will also report to the project's National Steering Committee. National Steering Committee (NSC) 4. The NSC comprise o f representatives from NEMC, Ministry o f Agriculture and Food Security (MAFS), Vice Presidents Office, Government Chemist Laboratory Agency, Health and Safety Authority, Ministry o f Livestock Development, Harbors Authority and the Tropical Pesticides Research Institute. The NSC will be chaired by the Permanent Secretary in the Vice- President's Office. The NSC will initially meet at least quarterly but, once the Project i s under way, at least every six months. The main functions o fthe NSC will include: approving the annual and bi-annual work plans and progress reports prepared by the PCT; monitoring Project finances; supporting and coordinating Government efforts to implement the Project; and - 40 - (d) monitoring and advising on project implementation, including against the indicators contained inthe Grant Agreement, andthe EMP. Project Coordination Team (PCT) 5. The PCT staff structure will include the following positions: a Project Coordinator, Disposal Coordinator andtwo field managers. They have already been identified and the PCT is operational. Finance, procurement and administration support will be provided by the NEMC. The Project will also be supported by a Technical Advisor Disposal which will be an external appointment financed from the Grant Agreement. Some o f the project activities will be supported by short-term individual consultants. Technical support will also be provided by the TSU according to an agreed work plan. 6. The PCT will be responsible for supporting and coordinating all technical aspects o f project implementation, described under the Country Operations Component ( h e x 4); and project management, including: coordinating project implementation within Government and programming o f external inputs, including from the TSU; in cooperation with NEMC, ensuring sound financial management and proper documentation o f receipt and expenditure o f funds, as well as the provision o f external annual audit reports to the Bank; preparing the annual, bi-annual work plans and progress reports, mid-term review report and quarterly FMRs. The NSC and TSU will receive copies o f the work plans, the progress reports and the mid term review. The ASP-PCU and the Bank will receive these reportstogether with the QuarterlyFMRs; updating and implementing the eighteen-month procurement plan, and submitting it to the Bank for approval; project M&E, including updating o fthe management information system; ensuring preparation, approval and implementation o f the CESA including an EMP, before disposal operations commence; updating the country Operational Manual, and ensuring implementation o f the Project according to the procedures contained in the Country Operational Manual; and ensuring that the project is implemented in accordance with agreed occupational health and safety procedures. NationalStakeholderAdvisory Forum (SAF) 7. A SAF will be chaired by the Director General o f NEMC or his nominee. It will comprise o f representative from private sector NGO's, farmers unions and any other non Government groups important to the success o f the project. Itwill: - 41 - (a) receive and be provided with opportunity to comment and advise on the 6 monthly work planandproject progress reports; (b) comment on technical reports and provide advice on the design and implementation o f disposal andprevention components including public awareness raising; and (c) enhance inter-agency as well as private-public sector collaboration and, where appropriate, recommend changes to project emphasis, approach and scope. The minutes o f the SAF meetings will be distributed to interested and affected parties. Supervisionmissions may meet with SAF members. ImplementationandInstitutionalArrangementsfor OverallASP-P1 TheASP Steering Committee (ASP-SC) 8. This will be the overall steering structure to the ASP. It will include the Bank,FAO-TSU, WWF, PAN-UK, NEPAD Secretariat and private sector (CLI). The ASP-PCU will act as a secretariat to the ASP-SC. The ASP-SC will meet quarterly andwill beresponsible for: (a) reviewing and advising on overall project implementation progress and work plans, including review of the overall annual ASP-P1 work plan and progress report and related financial status report prepared bythe ASP-PCU; (b) reviewing and advising on fund-raising progress; and (c) advising on any other critical key issues important to successful implementation o f the Project. - 42 - - 43 - 10. The ASP-PCU will be responsible for the results o f Component 4, Project Coordination: (a) coordinating project implementationbetweenthe partners; it will do this by providing bi-annual ASP-P1 work plans and progress reports to the ASP-SC and the project partners; (b) preparing consolidated FMRs for submission to the Bank; (c) convening the ASP-SC; (d) coordinating the design andpreparationo fthe ASP-P2; (e) coordinating a fimd raising strategy betweenthe partners; (f) coordinating the independent M&Eo fthe ASP-P1;and (g) ensuring effective communication between the partners. TechnicalSupport Unit (TSU) 11. FA0will host the TSU andbe responsible for providing high-level, technical support to countries as detailed in Annex 4. The FA0 will provide the necessary internal controls to manage the TSU. The TSU will prepare its bi-annual work plans in cooperation with the seven countries as well as with the ASP-PCU andthe Bank. 12. The TSU will submit bi-annual progress reports using the standard FA0 format and containing (i) implementation o f activities compared to the work plan; (ii) actual identification o f problems and constraints; (iii) recommendations for corrective measures; and (iv) detailed work programs for the following reporting period. The TSU will also submit FMRs to the ASP-PCU inorder to monitorproject expenditures andbudget forecasts. 13. The TSU will be coordinated by a senior specialist who will be responsible for budget management, operational activities, and staff management. An additional Senior Specialist will be posted in South Africa and will coordinate technical inputs to ASP-P1 countries. Other specialists will be recruited to coordinate M&E at the country level and prevention activities. The TSU will be supported by administrative assistants. In addition, the TSU will hire consultants as needed for specific tasks such as training and updatingo f manuals and guidelines. 14. The TSU coordinator will liaise with the ASP-PCU on programmatic issues and will maintain direct contact with ASP partners, donors and countries in order to ensure all technical issues are adequately addressed and technical inputs are coordinated. Within ASP-P1 the TSU will liaise directly with the PCTs ensuring that the needs o f the countries for technical support are met ina timely and efficient manner. Cross-CuttingActivities Management Entity (CCAME) 15. The CCAME will provide a support service, covering matters such as knowledge management, awareness-raising and strategic studies for the project, as described in Annex 4. - 44 - WWF and PAN-UK will execute this project function for ASP-Ply and will work closely with countries to support communication andknowledge management activities. 16. WWF staffwill include a director, senior program officers, senior administrative assistant and a senior program officer who will be locatedinthe WWF Africa regional office (all are part- time positions). WWF will mobilize their existing in-house capacity, e.g., WWF communications staff and staff from regional offices, and hire consultants for specific studies. PAN-UK will closely coordinate implementation o f capacity building and communications activities with PAN-Africa. CCAME will submit bi-annual reports to the ASP-PCU. ASP Unit 17. The Bank will establish an ASP Unit, supported by staff in MNA and Africa Regions, based on the current project preparation team. The rationale for this i s that the project will have six GEF Grant Agreements and a number o f other trust fund agreements. This will entail support to different entities including the current seven countries with follow-up ASP-P2 support envisaged for another eight countries. Inaddition, the Project involves two Bank regions: MNA and Africa. . The proposedASP Unitwill serve the following functions: (a) coordinating Bank project supervision and ensuring compliance with fiduciary requirements and legal covenants, supporting project launch workshops, a mid-term review andproduction o f the ImplementationCompletionReport; (b) reporting to donors, establishing new trust funds and negotiating grant agreements; (c) supporting the development o f the ASP-PCU; and (d) supporting the development o f ASP-P2. 18. In order to support the above, a dedicated unit is required. This will comprise o f a Coordinator, an Operations Officer and an Administrative Assistant. The ASP Unit will be supported by staff from the Africa Region. The ASP Unit will also be supported part-time by two identified Financial Management Specialists from the MNA and Africa Regions. As each country operation moves into project implementation phase, the procurement, disbursement, financial management, safeguards and country-specific TTL functions will be provided by the relevant country team staff, backed up by the ASP Unit. Project supervision will be initiated with workshops at project launch, and followed up with bi-annual project supervision missions. A mid-term review will be held and a project implementation completion report produced. The ASP Unitwill be based inWashington and will report to the Sector Manager o f AFTS4. 19. Role of partnersin projectpreparation and implementation:As the FA0 and WWF were involved in project preparation as partners, the Bank's Legal Department has confirmed that no conflict o f interest exists and that they may be involved inproject implementation. Only WWF involvement would be Bank-funded. Annex 6 provides more detaileddescription. - 45 - MonitoringandEvaluation 20. ASP's objective is to continually improve its standards o f operation and to minimize the potential for adverse impacts on humanhealth and the environment. Inaddition, ASP-P 1aims to reduce the implementation costs o f future country projects through the utilization o f capacity developed during ASP-P 1. ASP M&E h c t i o n s will take place at both the Program level and the Country level: 21. ASP ProgramLevel. The TSU is responsible for the consolidation andmanagement o f all ASP-P1 M&E technical data. A TSU M&E Officer will work inclose collaboration with the PMUsPCT to ensure the M&Eprocess is as simple and streamlined as technically possible. The TSU will complete two M&E missions annually. M&E reports will use standardized formats. Once complete, the reports will be passed to the M&E focal point within the PCT for review, consolidation and evaluation, including comparative evaluation within ASP-P 1 countries. Budget for the TSU M&E officer, supervisionmissions, the development o f an M&E system and training for Country PCTs are included in the FA0 budget for the TSU. The TSU will publish technical M&E data on the Web and develop reports for the ASP-PCU. The ASP-PCU will also provide guidance to ASP-P1 countries on the M&E process for ASP's financial aspects, including budget utilization, and actual costs versus budgeted costs. Inaddition, the ASP-PCU will be responsible for the final review o f financial data and the consolidation o f technical and financial reports to be forwarded to ASP-SC. 22. IndependentProjectMonitoring. The ASP-PCU will hire aninternational Independent Project Monitor. US$200,000 has been allocated for this task as part o f the ASP-PCU budget. In addition, the use of international and national NGO monitors will provide an important independent assessment o f the project to improve timeliness and performance efficiencies. The TORSinclude review and evaluation strategies for enhancing national capacity. Inparticular, a yearly evaluation o f the progress and management o f the ASP will be prepared by the evaluator inadvance of eachmeetingofthe ASP-SC, andsubmittedto the ASP to facilitate its work. The evaluation will include an assessment o f the quality o f coordination o f the various entities involved inmanaging ASP activities - the TSU, PCU, and CCAME, and the effectiveness o f the program inproviding timely financial andtechnical assistance to the participating countries. 23. M&E in the ASP Unit. The ASP coordinator and staff involved in the day-to-day supervision and supervision missions continually monitor, evaluate, and record observations as part o f program management for project implementation. Adequate GEF resources have been allocated to accomplish this task. 24. M&E at the Country-Level. At the country level, the PCTPMT will beresponsible for overall project monitoring. The CCAME will be conducting continuous training workshops for local NGOs to build up their capacity inconducting monitoring operations at the local level. All M&E data collected at the country level will be submitted to the TSU and ASP-PCU for consolidation. This will allow the TSU to identify common problems and develop lessons learned for ASP-wide dissemination and use. - 46 - ANNEX 7: FINANCIALMANAGEMENT AND DISBURSEMENT ARRANGEMENTS Background 1. A Financial Management (FM) assessment was conducted for the project implementing agency - NEMC and found "satisfactory". The project's financial management arrangements satisfy the World Bank's minimumrequirements under OPA3P10.02, Fiduciary Risks. Project risks 2. The overall project risks are rated as "low/negligible". There are no major risks that may face the project due to the fact that NEMC has sound financial management arrangements in place and qualified staff to manage the grant funds. Inaddition, Tanzania has already established the PCT. However, in order to ensure that the project funds are used in an efficient and economical way and exclusively for purposes intended, certain mitigation measures will be adopted. The mitigating measure will be that the project will be subject to regular implementation reviews which include quarterly financial monitoring reports on both financial and physical performance o f the project and an annual external audit report. The risk o f Tanzania not being able to meet project funding obligations was noted. However, this i s mitigated by the fact that the project is largely fully funded through grant financing. Further, no project account is required to be opened as financial contributions will be inkind. Country Risks 3. The Government o f Tanzania has clearly made great steps in improving public financial management through implementation o f the Public Financial Management Reform Program (PFMRP). The March 2005 Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Review (PEFAR) concludes that, generally Tanzania now has a sound system o f formal rules for financial management and extensive training has taken place on the application o f the financial rules and regulations. Most o f the recommendations contained in the 2001 Country Financial Accountability Assessment (CFAA) report have been implemented or are already included inthe Public Financial Management Reform Programme (PFMRP) under implementation. Interms o f appropriate legislation and regulatory frameworks, significant progress has been made to ensure that the risk associated with lack o f clear rules and regulations has been reduced. Also more useful information is now provided in the annual accounts. As a result the general level o f fiduciary risk has been reduced from high to medium. Although much has been accomplished, risks remain in terms of: (i)effective controls, compliance and sanctioning, including enforcement o f procurement andpayroll rules andprocedures; (ii) timeliness o f audited financial information and effectiveness of public reporting o f corruption; (iii) predictability o f internal and external resources; (iv) lack o f adequate qualified internal auditors, external auditors, and accountants. Inthis regard, during negotiations, the Bank was informed that the process for recruiting an Internal Auditor for NEMC was at an advanced stage. It was agreed that the Bank would monitor this development carefully; (v) effective independent oversight; and (vi) timeliness and effectiveness o f legislative andpublic scrutiny. - 47 - Bankaccounts anddisbursementprocedures: 4. The proceeds o f the GEF Grantwill be disbursed inaccordance with the Bank's standard disbursement procedures currently in use, Le., largely through transaction-based disbursement usingwithdrawal applications supported by Statements o f Expenditures. Direct payment may be used in some instances as discussed below. To expedite project financing and implementation, an advance will be made into the Tanzania Special Account (explained below) to cover approximately four months worth o f project expenditures. These disbursement procedures will be described inthe Disbursement Letter to the country after the signing o f the Grant Agreement with the Bank. The letter will describe the applicable disbursement procedures and the authorized method for withdrawing funds. 5. As Tanzania has sufficient experience with Bank-financed operations and disbursement procedures, no major difficulties are expected inthe flow o f funds. 6. SOE Thresholds: The Bank may require withdrawals from the GEF Trust Fund Grant Account to be made on the basis o f statements o f expenditure for expenditures under contracts: for: (a) goods costing less than US$250,000 equivalent per contract; (b) works costing less than US$300,000 equivalent per contract; (c) services o f individual consultants costing less than US$50,000 equivalent per contract; (d) services o f consulting firms under contracts costing less thanUS$lOO,OOO equivalent per contract; (e) Training andWorkshops; and (0Operating Costs, all under such terms and conditions as the Bank shall specify bynotice to the Recipient. 7. StaffingArrangements: Financialmanagement which includes financial arrangementin terms o f accounting, planningandbudgeting, reporting will be undertaken by the NEMC. The Finance department will ensure that the disbursements and financial management o f the project components are carried out efficiently and in accordance with acceptable international accounting standards issued by the International Accounting Standard Board or Public Sector Accounting Standards. Finance staff has adequate experience to carry out project financial affairs. 8. AccountingPoliciesand Procedures: Itis requiredthat Tanzania follows the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) as enunciated in the International Accounting Standards pronounced by the International Federation o f Accountants. A cash basis of accounting is requiredby the project. The calendar year i s January 1through to December 31.A Chart o fAccounts will be drawn up usingthe cost tables ofall participating countries. 9. Reporting and Monitoring: Monthly, quarterly and annual financial reports will be prepared by the NEMC Finance department. At the end o f each fiscal quarter, a quarterly financial report will be prepared and submitted to the Bank no later than 45 days after the end o f each fiscal quarter. The financial report will include the sources and uses o f funds, SOE withdrawal schedule, Special Account statements (andreconciliation thereto) or direct payment schedules, statements o f actual and budgeted expenditures, cash flow projections, etc.; physical progress reports; and a procurement report. - 4 8 - 10. Inaddition to the quarterly reports mentioned above, project financial statements should be prepared at the end o f each financial year (prior to June 30) incorporating these financial reports and a statement o fthe cashposition for project funds from all sources, when applicable, a statement reconciling the balances o f the various bank accounts, bank balances and notes to the financial statements. Quarterly FMRs will be prepared inthe "Government o f Atlantis" Sample from the Guideline bythe NEMC. 11. Internal Audit: Internal audit functions will be carried out by the NEMC, which is expected to be strengthened by employment o f an internal auditor, prior to grant signing. 12. ExternalAudit: External audits will beperformedbythe Auditor General inaccordance with theBank's guidelines andagreed TORS. 13. The Audited Project Financial Statements will be submitted to the Bank within six months after each year end. The auditor will be required to express an opinion on the Project Financial Statements in accordance with International Standards on Auditing. Inaddition to the audit report, the auditors will be expected to prepare management letters giving observations and comments, and providing recommendations for improvements in accounting records, systems, controls and compliance with financial covenants inthe Grant Agreements. 14. SupervisionPlan: Supervision activities will include: review o f financial projections or forecast for the Project, the procurement plan, the format and content o f auditing arrangements, measures o f physicalprogress, the criteria for followingup variances betweenplanned and actual costs andphysical progress. At minimum, two supervisionmissions a year are required. Flow of Funds DisbursementArrangements 15. Special Account: The Government o f Tanzania will open up a Special Account at a commercialbank on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Bank. 16. Disbursement: The Finance Department within the NEMC will manage all the disbursements. Disbursements will be made on a transaction basis, using SOEs. The NEMC will send withdrawal applications to the Bank for direct payments to suppliers and consultants. For replenishment o f the Special Account, the NEMC will issue and send a withdrawal application to the Bank. Supporting documents will be maintained by the NEMC Finance Department andmade available to the Bank's visitingmissions and auditors as required. , 17. Allocation of Grant Proceeds: The GEF Grant will be disbursed over a period o f four years. 18. DisbursementProcedures: Disbursement andwithdrawal procedures are detailed inthe Bank Disbursement Handbook. All disbursements will be governed by the conditions in the Grant Agreement andthe procedures inthe Disbursement Letter sent to Government. These will include the remedies available to the Bank in cases o f ineligible expenditures made from the - 49 - Special Account, the Special Account remaining inactive, or when the reporting requirements are not complied with. 19. DisbursementCategories: The category "Disposal Services" was agreed upon between the Africa and MNA Region. The procurement process under "Disposal Services' will comrnence with a pre-qualification exercise similar to the one used for civil works, Le., it will be an open application process and all applicants who can meet the pre-qualification criteria will be pre-qualified and subsequently invited to bid. Since the Bank has no off-the-shelf standard biddingdocuments for these "Disposal Services", it will be necessary to develop them based on other available documents, including the sample document "Procurement o f Non-Consultant Services". These documents will be prepared within first 12 months o fproject implementation. 20. The table below sets forth the Categories of items to be financed out o f the proceeds o f the Grant, the allocation o f the amounts with the financing percentage set at 100percent. Category Amount of the GEF Trust YOof Expenditures FundGrantAllocated(US$) to be Financed (1) Goods 835,000 100% I(3) Consultant Services 640,000 100% (4) Disposal Services I 3,040,000 I 100% I (6) Training and workshops 415,000 100% ! (5) Operating Costs 1,090,000 100% (7) Unallocated 620,000 TOTAL 6,870,000 21. "Operating Costs" means incremental operating costs on account o f Project coordination, implementation, and monitoring activities carried out by the PCT including office supplies, office rent, utilities, printing, advertising, per diems, bank charges, maintenance and operation o f Project motor vehicles, but excluding the salaries o fthe Recipient's civil service. -50- ANNEX8: PROCUREMENT General 1. Procurement for ASP-P1 will be carried out inaccordance with the World Bank's "Guidelines: Procurement Under IBRD Loans and International Development Agency (IDA) Credits'' dated May 2004; and "Guidelines: Selection and Employment o f Consultants by World Bank Borrowers" dated May 2004; and the provisions stipulated in the Grant Agreement. For each contract to be financed by the grant, the different procurement methods or consultant selection methods, estimated costs, prior review requirements, and time frame will be agreed between the Recipient and the Bank and recorded in the Procurement Plan. The Procurement Plan will be updated at least bi- annually, or as required, to reflect the actual project implementation needs and improvements in institutional capacity. Where applicable, the Bank's Standard Bidding Documents for goods and works and Standard Requests for Proposals for Consultants, as well as all standard evaluation forms, will be used throughout project implementation. Otherbiddingdocuments which do not follow Bank standards, including nationalbidding documents, may also be acceptable, provided they are reviewed by the Bank, prior to their first use. 2. Advertising. A comprehensive General Procurement Notice will be published for all ASP countries prior to Board presentation, in the dgMarket online, and UN Development Business (UNDB) online. Extracts o f this GPNwill also be published in a national newspaper o f each ASP country, as required by the Grant Agreement. In addition, a Specific Procurement Notice (SPN), to be published in dgMarket online and UNDB online for International Competitive Bidding (ICB) for goods and works, is required. Expressions o f Interest (EOI) for consulting services with an estimated value in excess o f US$200,000 will also be advertised inthe same manner. All I C B andNational Competitive Bidding (NCB) procurement o f works and goods and all Requests for EO1 will be advertised locally in Tanzania as required by the grant agreement. Contract awards will also be published in UNDB and dgMarket, in accordance with the Bank's Procurement Guidelines (para 2.60) andConsultants Guidelines (para 2.28). 3, Summary of Institutional Responsibility. The institutional responsibility for procurement lies with the NEMC. SummaryAssessment of Agencies Capacitiesto implementprocurement. 4. NEMC will establish a PCT specifically for the implementation o f this Project. However procurement will continue to be managed by NEMC. As agreed during negotiations A Procurement Officer has been appointed in March 2006 to strengthen procurement functions. The Officer i s proficient in Bank procurement procedures since for having worked as Procurement Specialist for another World Bank financed project. - 51 - 5. The new Public Procurement Act (2004) requires each procuring entity to establish a procurement management unit. According to the law, it is the procurement management unit that will carry out day-to-day procurement functions o f the procuring entity. The law also requires the procurement management unit to be independent. Tanzania has confirmed that a procurement unit exists inNEMC and that a procurement consultant will be employed for the project who will report to the Chief Administrative Officer o f NEMC. The consultant will assist for approximately 18 months in the preparation o f bidding documents, and Request for Proposals, carry out evaluation o f bids, prepare contracts documents, etc., andconduct handson training. 6. Dueto project processing delays the post will be filled shortly after signing o fthe grant agreement. 7. The procurement risk is "high." 8. Procurement of Works. Unless included specifically under Procurement o f Disposal Services, other works procured under ASP-Ply will be limited to soil decontamination and upgrade o f collection centers for obsolete pesticide stock storage. Ingeneral, allWorks estimated to cost lessthenUS$300,000 equivalent per contract shall be procured using National Competitive Bidding (NCB) procedures. Minor works contracts estimated to cost less than US$50,000 equivalent per contract may be procured using Shopping Procedures (SP). For International Competitive Bidding (ICB), the Bank's Standard Bidding Document (SBD) and Standard Bid Evaluation Forms for works will be used. Since the Government has already prepared Standard Bidding Documents for procurement o f works under NCB, these documents may be used for procurement o f works under NCB. Any other biddingdocuments may be used, provided they have been reviewed bythe Bank and found acceptable, before their first use. 9. Procurement of Goods. Goods procured under this project will include office equipment, computers, vehicles, field instruments (VHF radios, GPS, etc.), packaging, protective clothing, and specialty drum cleaning equipment. Contracts for goods estimated to cost less than US$250,000 may be procured using NCB. Contracts for goods estimated to cost less than US$50,000 may be procured using Shopping Procedures. For ICB, the Bank's SBDs - and Standard Bid Evaluation Forms will be used. Since the Government has already prepared Standard Bidding Documents for procurement o f goods under NCB, these documents may be used for procurement o f goods under NCB. Any other biddingdocuments may be used, provided they have been reviewed by the Bank and found acceptable, before their first use. To the extent possible, goods will be grouped into contract packages estimated to cost the equivalent o f US$250,000. 10. Direct Contracting. Goods which are specialized or o f aproprietarynaturemay, with Bank's prior agreement, be procured inaccordance with the provisions o fparagraph 3.6 ofthe Guidelines. - 52 - 11. Procurement of DisposalServices. Non-consulting services under this Project include disposal o f obsolete andburied pesticides and disposal o f containers. It may also include safeguarding o f obsolete pesticides (repackaging) as well as their transport. Pre- qualification o f service providers will be mandatory under the grant agreements, since these services are very specialized and require close familiarity with applicable international standards. A special pre-qualification document, modeled after the Bank's pre-qualification document for works, will be developed andused. This pre-qualification document will reflect the standards for disposal o f obsolete andburied pesticides andwill be approved by the Bank. Only providers who can demonstrate that they have the requisite capabilities and historical record to comply with these standards will be pre- qualified and invited to bid. Providers may be single firms or joint ventures o f several firms. The FAO-TSU will provide technical support for the pre-qualification, bidding and execution o f these specialized services. A special bidding document for disposal services modeled after the Bank's trial edition o f such document will be developed, used and furnished to the pre-qualified providers. Consultantservices. Consulting services under thisproject include: (a) surveys and studies for the selection o f appropriate technologies for disposal of buried pesticides, for the disposal o f contaminated containers andfor the treatment or disposal o fcontaminated soils; (b) developing country environmental and social management frameworks, reviewing relevant legislation, conducting risk assessment o f obsolete pesticides; and (c) consulting services for database development, financial and technical audits, training course delivery, capacity building and awareness raising program. Selectionof consultants 12. Quality-basedSelection. Services consisting o f training workshops, monitoring and evaluation will be procured interms o fparagraphs 3.2 through 3.4 o f the Consultant Guidelines. 13. SelectionBasedon Consultants' Qualifications. Services estimated to cost less than US$lOO,OOO equivalent per contract may be procured under contracts awarded in accordance with the provisions o f paragraphs 3.1, 3.7 and 3.8 o f the Consultant Guidelines. 14. Single Source Selection. Services for tasks in circumstances which meet the requirements o f paragraph 3.10 o f the Consultant Guidelines for Single Source Selection may, with the Bank's prior agreement, be procured in accordance with the provisions o f paragraphs 3.9 through 3.13 o f the Consultant Guidelines. 15. IndividualConsultants.. Services for assignments that meet the requirements set forth inthe first sentence o f paragraph 5.1 o f the Consultant Guidelines may be procured under contracts awarded to individual consultants in accordance with the provisions o f - 53 - paragraph 5.2 through 5.3 o f the Consultant Guidelines. Under the circumstances described inparagraph 5.4 o f the Consultant Guidelines, such contracts may be awarded to individual consultants on a sole-source basis. 16. Quality and Cost Based Selection. All consulting services contracts (excluding assignments o f standard or routine nature, e.g., audits) above US$lOO,OOO equivalent per contract will be awarded on the basis o f Quality-and Cost-based Selection (QCBS). Short lists for contracts costing less than US$200,000 equivalent per contract, may consist o f national firms only in accordance with provision o f paragraph 2.7 o f the Guidelines provided that at least sufficient number o f qualified firms are available at competitive costs. However, if foreign firms have expressed interest, they will not be excluded from consideration. 17. Training of ASP ImplementingAgencies. Inview o f the procurement capacity shortfall, the Bank will conduct a project launch workshop. In addition, on-the-job procurement training and workshops will be part o f every supervision mission, until capacities have reached a satisfactory level. Training will be provided either through the Bank's ownresources or through established training providers. 18. Procurement Plans. The Project has developed an 18-month procurement plan, dated April 20,2006 approved at Negotiations. The Procurement Planwill be updated in agreement with the Country Project Coordination Team bi-annually or as required to reflect the actual project implementation needs and improvements in institutional capacity. The appropriate selection method for each consulting contract will be recorded inthe Procurement Planaccordingto the aforementioned thresholds. 19. Prior and Post review thresholds. Except as the Bank shall otherwise determine by notice to the Recipient, the following contracts shall be subject to Prior Review by the Bank: (a) each contract for goods estimated to cost above US$250,000 equivalent per contract; (b) each contract for works estimated to cost above US$300,000 per contract; (c) each contract for consultants' services provided by a firm estimated to cost the equivalent o f US$lOO,OOO or more; and (d) each contract for individual consultants estimated to cost the equivalent o f US$50,000 or more. All other contracts shall be subject to Post Review by the Bank. 20. Publicationof ResultsandDebriefing. Publicationo fcontract awards would be required for all ICB, LIB, NCB, Direct Contracting and the Selection o f Consultants for contracts exceeding a value o f US$200,000. In addition, where pre-qualification has taken place, the list o f pre-qualified bidders will be published. With regard to ICB, and LIB,and large-value consulting contracts, ASP beneficiaries wouldbe requiredto assure publication o f contract awards as soon as the Bank has issued its `no objection' notice to the recommended award. With regard to Direct Contracting and NCB, publication o f contract awards could be in aggregate form on a quarterly basis. All consultants competing for an assignment involving the submission o f separate technical and financial proposals, irrespective o f its estimated contract value, would be informed o f the result o f the technical evaluation (number o fpoints that each firmreceived), before opening o fthe - 54 - financial proposals and, if they have secured the minimum qualifying mark stated in the Request for Proposals, they would be invited to attend the opening o f the financial proposals. The implementing agencies o f ASP beneficiaries would be required to offer debriefings to unsuccessful bidders andconsultants. 21. Fraud, Coercion and Corruption: All procuring entities as well as bidders, suppliers and contractors shall observe the highest standard o f ethics during the procurement and execution of contracts financed under the Project in accordance with paragraphs 1.15 & 1.16 o fthe Procurement Guidelines and paragraphs 1.25 & 1.26 o f the Consultants Guidelines. 22. Frequency of procurement supervision: In addition to the review o f ongoing procurement activities to be carried out during every Bank supervision mission o f the Project, the capacity assessment o f implementing agencies has indicated the need to visit the field units once every six months, in order to carry out a procurement review o f procurement transactions on an ex-post basis, using a randomly selected sample o f previously awarded contracts. At the same time, improvements inprocurement capacity will be evaluated and the updated Procurement Plans will be reviewed. To the extent possible, these reviews would be conducted concurrently. Tanzania- 18-monthProcurementPlan GoodsandWorks andnonconsultingservices 1 1 2 3 4 1 5 1 6 7 8 INo. (Description) E Cost in Method Q Preference Bank Bid- No' '000 US$ (yedno) (Prior/Post) Opening Date 1 Motor vehicles 70 NCB I NO I NO NO NO Post Post 15/09/06 15/09/06 2 Motor vehicles 211 NCB NO NO Post II15111/06 15/11/06 3 IOffice Machine I 101.00 I NCB NO NO Post 25/09/06 andEquipment 4 VHF radios, 99.26 NCB NO NO Post 25/09/06 GPS and other Field Equipment 5 Office furniture 189.50 NCB NO NO Post 25/09/06 - 55 - - 6 Personal 180.00 NCB NO Post 16110106 Protective and Safety Equipment, and other Expendable Items - 7 Materials for 50 NCB 30111/06 improvement of interim collection points TOTAL 900.76 ConsultingServices includingSurveys and Studies 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Review by Expected No. I Bank proposals (Prior/Post) Submission Date Prior 15111/06 Post 15111/06 Post 15111/06 CESA 4 Consulting services on 8.20 CQ Post 15/03/07 International Maritime Dangerous Goods training 5 Consulting services to review 12.10 CQ Post 15/03/07 relevant legislation 6 Consulting services on tender 64.80 CQ Post 28/06/07 administration for technical assessment for container decontamination and environmental assessment 7 Consulting services for the 10.00 IC Post 28/09/06 development and computerization of accounting and MIS 8 Consulting services to conduct 55.00 CQ Post 30/03/07 risk assessment on obsolete pesticides following safeguarding 9 Contract services for hiring o f 25.90 I C Post 30/03/07 IT specialist to prepare GIS inventory system - 56 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ref. Descriptionof Assignment Estimated Selection Reviewby Expected No. Cost in `000 Method Bank proposals US$ (PriorPost) Submission Date 12 Consulting services to conduct 55.00 CQ Post 28/02/07 programs on public awareness on pesticides management. 13 Consulting services to conduct 90.00 CQ Post 28107107 independent environmental monitoring. 14 Consulting services to 55.00 CQ Post 30/07/07 propagate national awareness raising. 15 Consulting services to provide 20.00 CQ Post 30101/07 health and safety policy training and manuals. 16 Consulting services for buried 40.00 CQ Post 28108/07 pesticides sites: finalization of field report, analysis, examination and disposal. 17 Consulting services on 70.00 CQ Post 28/02/07 protection health and safety o f project workers. 18. Procurement specialist 12-18 45.00 IC Post 3Of06106 months. I TOTAL 713.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Ref. Descriptionof Assignment Estimated Selection Review by Expected Comments No. Method Bank Starting I 1 I Conduct stakeholders I I `ooous$ 1I Cost in (PriorPost) 25/10/06 I Date 25.00 N/A 1I Prior 1I workshop to launch the project. 2 Conduct training on 15.00 N/A Prior 05/12/06 inventory and safeguarding including site visit. 3 Conduct training on safe 5.00 N/A Prior 10101/07 repackaging and transportation o f stockpiles to PCT staff. 4 Conduct training on IMDG 16.00 N/A Prior 15/07/07 code 5 Conduct TOT for 7.44 N/A Prior 15/02/07 storekeepers in preparation of collection o f stocks to major centers. - 57 - - - 1 * L I J 9 4 5 6 Ref. Descriptionof Assignment Estimated Selection Reviewby Expected Comments No. Cost in Method Bank Starting ] (Prior/Post) Date Launching o f media I`ooous% 15-50 N/A Prior 15/03/07 outreach campaign. Conduct training in health 16.00 N/A Prior 14111/06 and safety. Conduct national workshop 12.00 N/A Prior 13112/07 on container management to Task Team. Conduct specific training 6.02 N/A Prior 10/01/07 to PCT staff and national project staff on internal monitoring and evaluation of project activities. Training on safeguarding 15-00 N/A Prior 16/05/07 supervisory staff and core team of locally hired staff for repackaging. Training of 10.00 N/A Prior 21/03/07 environmental assessment field teams on data collection. Training o f Project Staff 10.00 N/A Prior 16110106 on FirstAid. TOTAL 152.96 - 58 - ANNEX 9: INCREMENTAL COSTANALYSIS FOR OVERALL ASP-P1 NationalDevelopmentObjectivesof ParticipatingCountries 1. The seven countries participating in ASP-P1 have, to varying degrees, adopted environment and development programs aimed at eradicating poverty, safeguarding humanhealth, conservingthe environment andbuildingcapacityofGovernment andcivil society to address these issues. In addition, ASP-P1 will support a further eight countries, to prepare for a second follow-on project calledASP-P2. 2. By addressing the problem o f obsolete pesticides, countries will protect some o f their most vulnerable inhabitants from potential chemical poisoning o f water supplies, crops, animals and ecosystems. Inaddition the capacity o f Government and civil society to prevent recurrence o f these problems will be built. 3. While many African Governments and agencies have begun to implement projects and programs to address the problem o f obsolete pesticides, additional financial and technical resources are required from the international community to allow these efforts to be fully successful. ASP-P1 GlobalEnvironmentalObjectives 4. ASP-P1 will directly contribute to the GEO: Reduction o f effects o f POPS on the global environment. Specifically, ASP-P 1will address: (a) improving the quality of life in the poor communities, by reducing environmental healthrisks; (b) improving environmental protection; and (c) enhancing the capacity o f the agricultural sector to better manage crop pests. 5. In ASP-PI, the GEF will support seven African countries (Tunisia, Morocco, South Africa, Ethiopia, Tanzania, Mali and Nigeria) to eradicate publicly-held stocks o f obsolete pesticides and prevent their re-occurrence. An additional eight ASP-P2 countries (to be selected), will also be supported to prepare follow-on projects. 6. The problem o f obsolete pesticide stockpiles and associated waste is not just a national problem. Scientific studies show that POPSare a global threat because they are persistent; they easily migrate through water and other means across national boundaries and even continents, and accumulate in living organisms far away from the original points o f contamination. 7. Insupporting ASP-P1, the international community will not only be supporting participating countries to eradicate a national threat to humanhealth and the environment but an escalating global threat as well. - 59 - 8. Baseline Scenario: The lack o f comprehensive management strategies over the past 40 years, combined with the following factors have contributed to the current situation: (a) product bans:banned pesticides that remain unused over time; (b) inadequate storage and stock management: pesticides have a limited shelf life which is shortened ifthey are not stored properly; (c) unsuitable products or packaging: poor product specifications, unavailability o frequired application equipment and lack o f labels inforeign languages; (d) donation or purchase in excess o f need: excess products often deteriorate duringstorage; (e) lack o f co-ordination among donor agencies: duplicated, unsolicited or inappropriate donations; (0 commerciaVentrepreneuria1 interest: over-assessment of need, inappropriate product supply and corruption; and (g) Government policy: central procurement o f pesticides and heavy subsidies for special programs like locust control, lack o f record keeping and poor monitoring o f the pesticide sector. 9. Obsolete pesticide stores can be found in numerous locations, and as a result o f accumulation at various steps in pesticide distribution and use. Pesticides are often imported into Africa, although some may be manufactured on the continent. Following their manufacture andor import into Africa, the pesticides are transported to wholesale storage and distribution sites. The pesticides are then sold and distributedto major users, retail stores and individual users. Major users, such as Government agencies, major industries, or industrial farms, may then either store or apply the pesticides. Smaller retail stores will re-sell pesticides in smaller quantities to individual users, or store them for sale at a later date. Individual users may immediately apply the pesticides, or store them for later use. The potential exists at each o f these sites (wholesale distributor site, major user, retail store and individual user) for pesticide obsolescence to occur. 10. Pesticides that are not sold prior to their expiration date become obsolete, and may be found within wholesale sites andinsmaller stores. Pesticides that were purchased either by major users or by individual users andwere not used may also become obsolete. While individual users may own and store obsolete pesticides which may pose grave health risks. These sources are outside the scope o f the Project and the environmental andsocial assessment. 11. Although the condition o f pesticide stores vary from country to country, the overall condition o f current stores (as confirmed by site visits in several countries) present serious human health and environmental risks. Although some countries have begun inventory, cleanup and disposal activities, many African pesticide stores have yet to be inventoried, let alone stabilized and subjected to remediation. 12. Storage sites may lack proper ventilation andpose serious healthrisks due to their proximity to houses and workplaces, their location on flood plains or near areas with high - 60 - water tables. The risks posedby such stores include the risk o f fire, ando f contamination o f local drinkingwater from infiltration through contaminatedsoils. 13. One o f the greatest challenges facing ASP-P1 and project planners is the uncertainty surrounding the quantity and location o f obsolete pesticide stores currently in Africa. Although several countries have completed initial andor detailed inventories, many others have yet to gain a clear idea o f the quantities, nature, locations and conditions o fpesticide stores within their boundaries. 14. Inmanycases, pesticide containers havedeteriorated andpesticides have escaped into the surrounding environment. One recent country report stated that "containers have deteriorated, corroded and started leaking, while bags have perished, spilling their contents on floors or directly on the soil." Another report stated that "the stores themselves are often in poor condition and do not comply with FA0 guidelines on pesticide storage." 15. Much o f the difficulty in estimating the total quantity o f obsolete pesticides (and the associated heavily contaminated soils andpackaging) can be attributed to decades o f varying degrees o f record keeping and documentation o f pesticide imports and stockpiling, as well as little to no detailed inventory assessment. Efforts to gain a detailed understanding o f the nature and distribution o f obsolete pesticide stores may be hampered by a number o f factors, including: damaged, worn containers and leaked pesticides; missing or worn off labels; existence or location o f small storage sites not recorded; remote location o f some storage sites; and, no inventories at storage sites. 16. An additional difficulty inestimatingthe quantityof obsolete pesticides inAfrica i s the potential for fluctuations in the amount o f obsolete pesticides within individual storage sites as useable pesticides pass their expiration dates and become obsolete. Where no inventories have yet been undertaken there i s an urgent need to begin detailed inventories to help verify the status o f the stock and the need for clean up and disposal. Such data is essential to program andproject planners to ensure that the sites that pose the greatest environmental and humanhealthrisks are stabilized and cleaned up. Despite the above difficulties, the following baseline scenario has been assembled for the countries involved inASP-P1. ASP-PI Component1: Country Operations 17. This component is concerned with disposal o f obsolete pesticides, prevention, capacity development andproject management. 18. Between 1992 and 1998 the following disposal operations were successfully completed. Approximately 3,240 tons o f obsolete pesticides were removed during this period (see table below). - 61 - Disposaloperationsinknown African countries: 1991-1998 letedPesticideDisposalOpt Product(s) Dieldrin 60 USAID/GTZ/Shell 1991 Kenya Various 100 ICI, Twiga Chemicals 1993 Uganda Dieldrin 50 FAOA-JNCDF 1993 Madagascar Dieldrin 70 GTZ 1993 Malawi Aerosol waste, contaminated soil 70 Shell 1994 Mozambique DDT/monocrotophos 160 GTZ 1994 South Africa various 1,000 Government and Private Sector DirectorateGeneral for 1995 Tanzania Various products 280 International Cooperation (DGIS) 1996 Tanzania DNOC 57 GTZ 1997 Zambia Various products 360 FAODGIS/GTZ 1997 Seychelles Various products 12 FAODGIS 1997 Mauritania Dieldrin 200 GTZ/Shell 1997/98 Cote d'Ivoire Various, sludge, contaminated soil 821 Shell 19. Between 1990 and 2004 approximately 4,340 tons o f obsolete pesticides were disposedo fwith an estimatedcost o fUS$lS.O million. 20. Regarding disposal operations, under the baseline scenario, all of Africa would probably spend no more than US$l.O million to US$3.0 million on disposal operations per annum. This mounts to US$4.0 million to US$12.0 million over ASP-Pl's four-year project period. The amount o f obsolete pesticide stocks which could be disposed of across Africa at the historical disposal cost of US$3,400 per tons is 300-900 tons per annumor 1,200 to 3,600 tons over afour-year period. - 62 - ApproximateDisposalFiguresfor Africaper Annum 1991 160 560,000 1992 0 0 1993 190 665,000 1994 160 560,000 1995 280 980,000 1996 57 199,500 1997 572 2,002,000 1998 821 2,873,500 1999 0 0 2000 900 3,150,000 2001 0 0 2002 1.200 4.200.000 I I , Total 4,340 15,190,000 21. Under the baseline scenario it i s not entirely possible to estimate or know what resources would be devoted to the six GEF-supported countries (Ethiopia, Mali, Morocco, South Africa, Tanzania and Tunisia) in ASP-P1 over the four year period for the safe disposal o f obsolete pesticides. If, for demonstration purposes, 30 percent o f the baseline resources for Africa were allocated to these countries, this would result in approximately US$1.3 million to US$4.0 million being devoted to the disposal o f approximately 400 to 1,200 tons o f obsolete pesticide over the four year project period (see table below). Since these six countries contain an estimated 4,850 tons o f obsolete pesticide stocks, the threat to the local and global environment would remain. - 63 - EstimatedTons of ObsoletePesticidesinASP-P1C~untries'~ currently underway Mali 400 76 Extensive soil and water contamination IMorocco I 700 IApproximately225 I None I Nigeria 500 To be confirmedby Project will not address inventory disposal Extensive clean up already South Africa 250 To be confirmed undertaken and tentative inventory exists Tanzania 1,200 To be confirmed by None inventory Tunisia 1,200 128 pooledinto 17 None sites 5,350 - estimated Inventoriesto confirm Total 4,850 tons to be disposed of by ASP- quantity, number of sites and P1(Nigeria excluded) types of pesticide 22. In summary, baseline resources of US$4.0 million are assumed for the project duration for the ASP-P1 countries. ASP-PI Component 2: TechnicalSupport 23. Technical support and related project monitoring i s currently provided on an ad hoc basis to countries through FAO, UNEP, WHO, Base1 Convention Regional Centers and NGOs. Under the baseline scenario, this is not expected to amount to more than US$0.4 million for the four-year period. ASP-PI Component 3: Cross-Cutting Activities 24. This component is concerned with overall communication on ASP issues, NGO capacity building activities, country adoption of the various chemical conventions, and the assessment o f new technologies for the disposal o f obsolete pesticides. The baseline l3This information has already beendisclosed as part ofthe Environment and Social Assessment Synthesis Report (please refer to page 15). - 64 - scenario for the cross-cutting activity support is somewhat hypothetical as no such unit would exist without ASP-P1. It i s however assumed that some o f these activities would conceivably take place without ASP at a funding level o f US$200,000 over the four-year period. ASP-PI Comuonent 4: Project Coordination 25. This component is concerned with the overall coordination o f effort to implement multi-country and multi-donor pesticide disposal and prevention activities. Under the baseline scenario no coordination mechanism would exist as this i s a completely ASP- funded initiative. Nevertheless, some form o f ad hoc coordination and communication would probably take place between various entities involved in obsolete pesticide disposal and prevention operations. Therefore, a baseline budget o f US$200,000 is assumed for the four years. GEFAlternative 26. The objective o f the GEF alternative i s to achieve a quantum leap in efforts to eliminate obsolete pesticides in Africa and prevent their recurrence. This includes eliminating the most dangerous and difficult to dispose o f pesticides, which represent a significant threat to humanhealth, biodiversity and international waters. 27. With 50,000 tons o f obsolete pesticides in Afiica and a baseline disposal rate of no more than 1,200 tons per annum, it will take over 41 years to dispose o f all stocks, assuming no fiuther growth. The proposed GEF alternative aims to tackle the problem within a 15-year period. It will achieve this by taking a continent-wide approach, applying lessons learned from past efforts, and buildingon existing initiatives. The ASP will be able to apply the volume and quality o f resources necessary to provide a comprehensive solution to cleaning up and disposing o f obsolete pesticides and dealing with the problem o f contaminated soils. Specific outputs o fthe programwill be country- based clean up and disposal operations, and in-country and region-wide pesticide management programs to prevent a recurrence o f the problem. The GEF alternative therefore aims to support a comprehensive solution and will leverage significant co- financing to achieve this. 28. The GEF alternative is US$64.81 million. The GEF will provide US$25.0 million comprising o f US$21.7 million channeled through the Bank and US$3.26 million provided directly to FAO. Additional co-financing has been leveraged including: US$7.06 million from the Bank MDTF to support Mali (contaminated soils), the ASP- PCU, preparation for ASP-P2 countries and support to the CCAME/ WWF activities; US$2.7 million from the DGF for the PCU, TSU CCAME and preparation o f ASP-P2 countries; Government contributions of US$3-95 million; US$4.07 million provided by Belgium to Ethiopia; US$2.29 million provided by Canada via CIDA to Nigeria; USS$1.13 million provided by Japan to Ethiopia; US$1.62 million provided by FFEMto Mali and to Tunisia; US$1.02 million provided by Finland to Ethiopia; and US$O.OS - 65 - million co-financing provided by FA0 to the TSU. US$lO.O million will be provided by the ADB to a TF for allocation to Country Operations. ASP-PI Component 1: Countw Operations (7 countries) GEF alternative: US$S5.37 million (GEF funding US$21.74million) 29. GEF will provide incremental funding to ASP-P1 in six countries to address the issue o f obsolete pesticides. Nigeria will f h d its own participation in this component. The GEF will support another eight ASP-P2 countries to prepare projects. Under the GEF alternative, incremental fundingwill beprovidedto support in-country to: (a) eliminate inventoried publicly-held obsolete pesticide stocks, soils and contaminated containers amounting to approximately 4,850 tons (GEF: US$16.24 million; Co-financing: US$7.47 million). Country inventories will identifythe exact tons andifneed be, the grant agreements will be amendedto prioritize the removal of the obsolete pesticides above other activities; (b) prevent accumulation o f obsolete pesticides (GEF: US$2.37 million; Co- financing: US$3.12 million); (c) provide capacity-building to governments to strengthenpesticide management and regulation (GEF: US$l.O million; Co-financing: US$0.55 million); (d) to support country project management (GEF: US$2.13 million; Co-financing: US$3.04million); and (e) support to eight ASP-P2 countries to prepare projects and to prevent obsolete pesticides from re-occurring (Co-financing: US$3.O 1million). ASP-PI Component 2: Technical Support Unit (FAO-TSU) GEF alternative: US$4.70 million (GEF fundinp US$3.26million1 30. Incremental finding will be made available to assist the TSU to: (a) provide technical assistance to counties in the development o f the Country OMS and the completion o f preparatory activities related to training and capacity building(GEF: US$0.06million; Co-financing: US$0.38 million); (b) provide technical assistance to the six countries to implement disposal operations (GEF: US$0.93 million; Co-financing: US$O.10million); (c) provide technical assistance to seven countries to build their capacity to prevent re-occurrence o f the obsolete pesticide problem (GEF: US$0.93 million; Co-financing: US$0.54million); and (d) provide overall country M&E o f country performance against agreed technical standards (GEF: US$1.3 million; Co-financing: US$0.03 million). - 66 - ASP-PI Component 3: Cross-Cutting Activities (WWF) GEF alternative: US$2.65 million (GEF funding US$2.40 million) 31. Incremental funding will bemade available to support three sub-components to: (a) provide overall knowledge management and communication about the project (GEF:US$Omillion; Co-financing: US$0.94 million); (b) support to NGO involvement. (GEF: US$O million; Co-financing: US$1.08 million); (c) determine the best new technology choices for the disposal o f obsolete pesticides for the second project, ASP-P2 (GEF: US$O million; Co-financing: US$0.43 million). ASP-PI Component 4: Proiect Coordination (Bank) GEF alternative: US$l.87million fGEF funding US$Omillionl 32. Incremental funding will be made available to support coordination among the seven ASP-P1 countries, the eight ASP-P2 countries, CCAME, TSU, the various governance structures and funders and donors, including the Bank. Incremental Co- financing will beusedto: (a) coordinate the provision of the overall ASP bi-annual work planandprogress report through inputs received from the various countries and global components; (b) support the governance structures including the ASP-SC, which will review these reports andprovide recommendations; and (c) report on the findings o f the independently commissioned M&Econsultants. Cost Summaries 1. Country Operations 4.00 55.37 21.74 19.54 51.37 2. Technical Support 0.40 4.71 3.26 1.05 4.3 1 :I: 3. Cross-Cutting 0.20 2.65 0 2.45 2.45 Activities 1 1 1 1 4. Project Coordination 0.21 2.07 0 1.87 Total 4.81 64.80 25.O 34.91 - 67 - IncrementalCost Matrix gi; DomesticBenefit GlobalBenefit million) Sporadic country Sporadic disposal and Component 1: Baseline Total: 4.00 disposal operations preventionoperations remove up to 1,200 tons provide minimal of obsolete pesticides protectionto the global against approximated environment. 4,800 tons insix Country 1Icountries. Operations Obsolete pesticides are Disposaloperations GEF Total: disposed o f and remove a potential trans- Alternative 55.37 preventionmeasures boundary threat to global introducedto safeguard ecosystems and local inhabitants and the preventionmeasures surrounding prevent recurrence o fthe environment, problem. Increment Total: 51.37 Technical support Component 2: Baseline provides very limited protection to the global environment. of country demands. Y Technical support Technical support Technical GEF Total: 4.7 1 enables countnes to fully enablescountries to Support Alternative I implement disposal and- implement disposal and preventionmeasures. preventionmeasuresto safeguardthe global environment. Increment Total: 4.3 1 Countries andNCiO's Dueto low levels of ComDonent3: Baseline Total: 0.20 receive sporadic cross-cutting su port, informationabout knowledge and est disposal andprevention practice is inadequately actwities andnew disseminated thereby Cross-Cutting relatedtechnologies. having a limitedpositive Activities impact on the global environment. Countries arereadily Best practice information GEF Total: 2.65 able to access and knowledge is A1ternative informationon disposal disseminated to countries and prevention activities andcivil society thereby and NGO's are able to reducin the pesticide enhance civil society riskto t e global !? knowledge. environment. Increment Total: 2.45 - 68 - Some ad hoc Some coordinated ComDonent4: Total: 0.20 coordinationdisposal activitiesbetween countries and donors may take place. withmar 'nal benefit for the globa environment. ff Project Strong coordination Coordination A coordinated response Total: 2.07 takes placebetween takes place inseven Alternative countries andsupporting African countries to agencies thereby remove a global pollution enablingcountries to threat. implementbestpractice national disposal and preventionmeasures. Increment Total: 1.87 Baseline 4.80 I GEF 64.81 Alternative IncrementalCost GEF Non-GEF Total FullProject 25.00 35.0 60.0 Preparation 0.70 0.2 0.9 Grand Total 25.70 35.2 60.9 - 69 - ANNEX10: SAFEGUARD POLICYISSUES Background 1. ASP-P1 triggers two safeguards policies: (i)OP 4.01 on Environmental Assessment (EAs) because it has the potential to significantly impact the environment adversely; and (ii)OP 4.09 on Pest Management because it deals with obsolete pesticides and pesticide management. Compliance with the above two safeguards policies will be ensured as follows: OP4.01/ BP401on EnvironmentalAssessment 2. ASP-P1's potential adverse environmental impacts are principally related to pesticide storage, transportation, disposal and site remediation activities in country operations. Due to their significance, the project i s classified as Category A and requires preparation o f CESAs, including an EMP. Given the framework nature o f the Project (under which the detailed technical design and location o f the project country level activities take detailed shape only after completion o f pesticide inventories during the Project implementation), the preparation o f the CESA, including the EMP, takes place in two stages. 3. The ASP environmental and social impacts were assessed in a Framework Environmental Assessment and their mitigation measures were outlined in an Environmental and Social Management Framework. The Environmental and Social Assessment Synthesis Report was prepared based on these documents and will serve as guidance for the preparation o f the respective CESA. The Environmental and Social Assessment Synthesis Report was disclosed prior to appraisal inTanzania inMarch 2004 and in the InfoShop on March 17, 2004. The Project Integrated Safeguards Data Sheet (ISDS) was disclosed in October 26, 2005. The Environmental and Social Assessment SummaryReport was disclosed to the Board on November 3, 2004. A bindingcovenant inthe Project legal document will bemade, stating that the Government ofTanzania will prepare a CESA early in Project implementation. Annex 10 discusses more specifically how ASP-P1will ensure compliance with the safeguard policies. 4. The Environmental and Social Assessment Synthesis Report provides guidance, screening procedures and information to those responsible for the detailed design, planningand implementation o f the individual country operations. The guidance reflects the applicability and relevance o f key international standards and agreements, as well as the Bank's safeguard policies, including preparation o f the detailed EMP (as part o f the CESA). 5. The CESA including the EMP will be prepared during project implementation for Tanzania. It will spell out the mechanisms that will allow the Bank to properly exercise its fiduciary responsibilities regarding the implementation o f its safeguards policies, e.g., - 70 - the need for a Bank-issued "No Objection" on the screening andpriority rankingprocess, and on TORs for individual cleanup operations. TORs for the preparation o f the CESA are provided inthe Country OM. Tanzania has specified intheir Country OM how it will implement the CESA. 6. The Environmental and Social Assessment Synthesis Report presents a framework o fmitigation measures. Special attentionwas given to the following issues: (a) disclosure o f information inorder to maximize the efficiency and the synergy ofpublic andprivate efforts indealing with pollution and safety hazards; (b) emergency preparation and response plans, especially, during hauling and transport o f hazardous products; (c) the scope o fthe prevention activities inrelation to pest management; (d) the handling o f contaminated areas in the vicinity o f dwellings or other property, inparticular, compensation issues in cases where cleanup would be impractical; (e) the handlingo f contaminated wells andother water sources; and (f) the need to take into consideration the entire "chain o f custody'' during sampling, transportation and disposal operations, irrespective o f their geographical location. 7. The second stage will be the preparation o f the CESA. During project implementation, the PCT will ensure that the cleanup operations are subject to the CESA and that their specific adverse environmental impacts are adequately addressed through preparation and implementation o f a corresponding EMP. The EMP will reflect the applicable national or international standards, provisions o f the Rotterdam, Basel and Stockholm Conventions and other relevant Codes o f Practice and guidelines, requiring that contractors demonstrate experience and competence in removal and cleanup o f hazardous materials and set requirements for quality control and technical supervision by the TSU. This will include requiring that the packaging, labeling, and transport o f stocks and wastes comply with the internationally accepted standards and procedures found in the UN "Orange Book". In addition, the technologies selected for disposing of the stockpiles and wastes will be required to meet both the Stockholm Convention Best Available TechniquedBest Environmental Practice (BATBEP) guidelines and the appropriate Basel Convention and Stockholm Convention Technical Guidelines for Environmentally Sound Management. 8. The CESA including the EMP will be disclosed in Tanzania and inthe InfoShop according to the Bank's Policy on Disclosure o f Information. Their preparation will involve adequate public participation in following the requirements o f OP 4.01. The Bank and TSU will monitor their implementation following the procedures outlined in the OM. 9. Training on the preparation and implementation o f CESA and risk assessment will be provided through the TSU and the Bank at start o f project implementation, as described inthe country OM. OP 4.09 on Pest Management 10. OP 4.09 requires preparation o f a Pest Management Plan (PMP). The entire project is dedicated to improving pesticide and pest management issues including prevention, cleanup and measures toward strengthening pesticide management, prevention o f pesticide stockpiling andpromotion o f IPM. These activities are described indetail inthis PAD and other project documents. The project will promote awareness and improved regulations and better handling o f pesticides and will also promote the adoption by countries o f I P M policies. In addition to the EMP (prepared as part o f the CESA) the project documents will meet all PMP requirements. Hence, a stand alone PMPwill not beprepared. AdditionalSafeguardConsiderations 11. Involuntary Resettlement. Although current information indicates that pesticides are usually stored away from people, the project may identify situations when proximity o f pesticide stores to people would raise concerns for their health and safety during cleanup and disposal. Similarly, a need may arise during implementation to condemn certain sites or structures (e.g., warehouses, district back offices that might have been used for storage) as being too contaminated to merit cleanup. 12. Normally, such a situation would trigger OPBP 4.12 and would require the preparation of a Resettlement Policy Framework. However, given the multi-country nature o f ASP-P1, and the number o f cleanup sites within each country, it is not feasible to prepare an umbrella framework for project countries given their dissimilar legislation andpolicies related to landacquisition andresettlement. similarly, it is neither practical nor realistic to prepare a separate framework for each country, especially when there i s no confirmed evidence that existing pesticide siteshtorages will result inland acquisition or resettlement. Because o f this particular situation, it has been decided not to trigger OPBP 4.12 at this stage. Rather, a bindingcovenant in the project legal document will be made, stating that each country will prepare a CESA prior to implementation o f disposal activities. Each CESA will provide precise information and data on whether there are structures or sites or anything else that needs to be condemned or treated, resulting in involuntary resettlement, and acquisition, or total and partial loss o f livelihood. In such a case, a Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) or several RAPSfor affected sites will be prepared in compliance with OPBP 4.12 by the Govemment(s) concerned and cleared by the Bank. Each RAP will provide that, among other things, should any person be temporarily or permanently relocated as a result o f project activities, compensation will be provided in accordance with the provisions o f OP 4.12 andBP 4.12. 13. Natural Habitats. Although current information indicates that pesticides are usually stored away from any critical or other natural habitat, the project may identify situations when proximity o f pesticide stores to protected areas, important aquatic resources, or any terrestrial, freshwater, coastal, and marine ecosystems would raise - 72 - concerns for their environmental health over time. During project implementation, if a stock o f obsolete pesticides, pesticide wastes or a contaminated site happen to be located in the proximity of a critical natural habitat(s), then such a situation would trigger OP 4.04 andwould require that the EA process (OP 4.01) would identify such habitats within a proposed project's area o f influence and will take the necessary measures to avoid or minimize damage to natural habitats to the extent feasible. If significant conversion or degradation o f a non-critical natural habitat i s needed to achieve a project's key objectives, the project will include an evaluation o f the alternatives to show there are no feasible alternatives as well as mitigation measures acceptable to the Bank. - 73 - ANNEX 11: PROJECTPREPARATIONAND SUPERVISION: TANZANIA Project Schedule Planned Actual PCNReview July 17,2002 InitialPID to InfoShop August 1,2002 Integrated SafeguardsData Sheet (ISDS) July 24,2003 Appraisal MissionDeparture III April2004 III March28,2004 Negotiations April 17,2006 April 20,2006 Board Approval October 31,2006 PlannedDate ofEffectiveness February 12,2007 PlannedDate of Mid-Tern Review August 31,2008 Planned Closing Date I June 30,20 10 I Preparedby: 14. ASP-P1 has beenconceived and designedby a group o f NGOs (WWF, PAN-UK and PAN-Africa), FAO, UNEP, andother international organizations, includingthe Bank andthe private sector, inclose collaboration with the ASP countries inAfrica. Preparation Assistance: 15. GEF, as the interim financing mechanism for the Stockholm Convention, has contributed preparation funding together with other financial or in-kindresources from other partnerinstitutions - CanadaandFA0 Cooperative Program. - 74 - 16. The Tanzania ASP-P1 Project Team includes the following staff and consultants: IEPARTMENT SPECIALTY Peter Kristensen AFTS4 Senior Environmental Specialist (Task Team Leader) Denis Jordy AFTS4 Senior Agricultural Specialist (co-Task Team Leader) ~~ Steven Maber MNSRE Senior Operations Officer Chris Warner AFTS1 Senior Environmental Specialist Muthoni Kaniaru LEGAF Senior Counsel " ................................... " " "........- ............ .......................................... .................... ........................... ~ .................................................................................... " " Mercy Sabai AFTFM Senior Finance Officer Stefanie Braclunann MNSRE Environmental Specialist Abdelaziz Lagnaoui .............."................" ............................ .............."............... .................................. ESDQC...................... ..........."...................... Senior Pest Management Specialist .......... .. ................. ~ " " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ Warren Waters AFTSD Regional Safeguards Coordinator .....".......... Amadou................... Konare ATS1 Senior Environmental Specialist " .-.............. (.."........."......... ."....... ...... ..... .....~.............I"."..".... ................. ~ " ~ ~ I " " " Jane Kibbassa AFTS2 Rural Development Specialist Serigne Omar Fye AFTS2 Senior Environment Specialist (Africa RegionASP-P 1Coordinator - Tanzania) Pascal........................... .............................. AFTPM Procurement Specialist " Tegwa........................................... "...................................... ......................................................................................... " ....... ............................................................ ................................................ " "" " Donald Mneney AFTPM Procurement Specialist Modupe Adebowale ................................. ..(."..................."............................................... .................."............... ....... ............................... LOAG2 ..................." Senior Disbursement Officer ~ "" " Lucie Tran AFTS4 Operations Officer Meseret Kebede AFTS1 Language Programme Assistant ............................................... Ellen Tynan ..............".............................................................. ..........".... ENVMP Senior Environmental Specialist " ............................ .............." ................ ................................... ~ ~ " ~ .." ............................................................... ~ ~ " Aza Rashid AFMTZ Team Assistant Me1Jaya ... .................... AFMZA Team Assistant " " " .(("................. ........................."..................................................... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Marie-Jeanne Ndiaye AFTS4 Language ProgramAssistant - 75 - ANNEX 12: DOCUMENTS INTHE PROJECT FILE BankAssessment ASP-P1 Project Coordination Unit:Terms ofReference, Budget andWork Plan, February2005 Framework Operations Manual Draft FinancialManagement Report Country Pre-Appraisal Reports ConceptPaper for aKnowledge Management Systemfor ASP ProcurementAssessments for Ethiopia, Mali, Morocco, Nigeria, South Africa, Tanzania, Tunisia, DBSA, WWF ProcurementPlans for Ethiopia, Mali, Morocco, Nigeria, South Africa, Tanzania, Tunisia, WWF Financial ManagementAssessments for Ethiopia, Mali, Morocco, Nigeria, South Africa, Tanzania, Tunisia, WWF, PAN-UK, DBSA Appraisal Aide Memoires for ASP-PCU, Ethiopia, Mali, Morocco, Nigeria, South Africa, Tanzania, Tunisia, and WWF Environmental and Social Assessment Synthesis Report, March 17,2004 Environmental Assessment - Executive Summary, October 2004 Africa Stockpiles Programme (ASP) Generic Operational Manual, May 2005 COSTAB Tables for ASP-P1, June 2005 OTHERS Tanzania, Aide-Memoire, November 3,2005. Draft Operational Manual including(Financial ManagementManual dated 26,2006. MinutesofNegotiations, April 19,2006. Basel Convention, 2002: Technical Guidelines for Environmentally Sound Management o f Persistent Organic Pollutant Wastes. Secretariat o f the Basel Convention, UnitedNations Office at Geneva Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Africa Stockpiles Programme, Obsolete Pesticides Project, SecondPhase Country Report, February2003 Food andAgriculture Organization (FAO) and WHO, 2001: Manual on Development and Use of FA0 and WHO Specifications for Pesticides. First Edition. Preparedby the FAO/WHO Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2001: FA0 Pesticides Disposal Series No 1. Prevention and disposal of obsolete and unwanted pesticide stocks in Africa and the Near East. First Consultation Meeting Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2001: FA0 PesticidesDisposal Series No 2. Preventiono f accumulation o f obsoletepesticide stocks Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2001: FA0 Pesticides Disposal Series No 3. Pesticide storage and stock control manual Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2001: FA0 PesticidesDisposal Series No 4. Disposal of bulk quantities of obsoletepesticides indeveloping countries - 76 - e Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2001: FA0 PesticidesDisposal Series No 5. Prevention and disposal o f obsolete and unwanted pesticide stocks in Africa and the Near East. SecondConsultation Meeting e Food andAgriculture Organization (FAO), 2001: FA0PesticidesDisposal Series No 6. Prevention and disposal o f obsolete and unwanted pesticide stocks in Africa and the Near East. Third Consultation Meeting e Food andAgriculture Organization (FAO), 2001: FA0PesticidesDisposal Series No 7. Guidelinesfor the managementof small quantitiesofunwantedandobsoletepesticides e Food andAgriculture Organization (FAO), 2001: FA0PesticidesDisposal SeriesNo 8. Assessing soil contamination: areference manual e Food andAgriculture Organization (FAO), 2001: FA0PesticidesDisposal Series No 9. Baseline study on the problemof obsolete pesticide stocks e Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2005: Technical Support Unit to the Africa Stockpiles Programme (Draft) e Helps, K, 2001: Ethiopia - Obsolete Pesticide Project. Project Health and Safety Manual Helps, K, 2002: Technical Issues - Liabilities and Risks for the ASP Kristensen, P. 2003: Concept Paper for aKnowledge Management System for the ASP Kristensen, P. and Rader, C., 2001: Strategic Management Approach. Conservation International. PACT Publications e Maroc Rapport - Programme Africain sur les Stocks de Pesticides P6rim6sYJanvier 2003 e OECD, 1997: Report of the OECD Workshop On Pesticide Risk Indicators. Copenhagen, 21-23 April 1997 e Ottke, C., Kristensen, P. and Maddox, D.: Monitoring for Impact. World Resources Institute, UnitedNations Environmental Program, Conservation International e Terra Choice andJacques Whitford: The Africa Stockpiles Programme (ASP) - Framework Environmental Assessment (FEA) andEnvironmental and Social ManagementFramework (ESMF), January 29,2004 e Terra Choice and Jacques Whitford: The Africa Stockpiles Programme(ASP) - Framework EnvironmentalAssessment (FEA) andEnvironmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) -Executive Summary Report, January 29,2004 e TunisieRapport: LeProgramme Africain pour 1'Elimination de PesticidesObsolbtes (PASP, Mars 2003 e UnitedRepublic of Tanzania, Obsolete Stockpile Programme, Obsolete Waste Disposal Project Country Report, February, 2003 e World Bank, 2002: Toxics andPoverty: The Impact o f Toxic Substances on the Poor in Developing Countries; LynGoldman andNga Tran e World Bank, 2003: Proceeding from ASP Partners' Meeting and Country Workshop, September9 to 19,2003 e WWF Using Communications and NGO Awareness Raising to Build Capacity in Africa through the Africa Stockpiles Programme, March 2005. - 77 - ANNEX 13: STATEMENTOFLOANS CREDITS AND STATUS OFIBRD AND IDA OPERATIONS CAS Annex BE Tanranla - OperationsPortfolio (IBRDIIDA and Grants) A. Of Date03/06/2006 Closed Projects 113 IBRD/IDA Total Disbursed(Active) 585.38 of which has been repaid 3.24 Total Disbursed(Closed) 4,078.57 of whichhas been repaid 825.30 Total Disbursed (Active+ Closed) 4.554.05 of which has been repaid 828.54 Total Undisbursed(Active) 875.36 Total Undisbursed(Closed) 0.53 Total Undisbursed(Active+Closed) 875.88 Active Proiectp Last PSR SupervisionRatlna ProjectID ProjectName Qweloament lrnalementation Qbiectivep Proaress FiscalYear IDA PO85009 Private Sector Commtitiveness NIA NIA 2006 95.0 PO69982 RegionalTrade Fad. Proj. - Tanzania MS MS 2001 15.0 PO78387 TZ-Central Transp Corridor Prj (FY04) S S 2004 122.0 PO59073 TZ-Dar Water Suply & Sanitation (FY03) MS MU 2003 61.5 PO74624 TZ-Emergency PowerSupply (FY04) MS S 2004 43.8 PO57187 TZ-FIDP 2 (FYOO) S S 2000 27.5 PO58706 TZ-Forest Conserv B Mgmt SIL (FY02) MU MU 2002 31.1 PO57234 TZ-GEF Eastern Arc Forests SIL (FY04) S MU 2004 PO71014 TZ-HIVIAIDS APL (FY04) S S 2004 PO82335 TZ-Health Sec Dev 2 (FY04) S S 2004 65.0 PO70736 TZ-LOC GOvt SUpt SIL (FY05) S S 2005 52.0 PO73397 TZ-Lower Kihansi Env Mgmt TAL (FY02) S S 2002 6.3 ~082492 TZ-Marine & Coastal Env Mgmt SIL (FY06) S S 2006 51.O PO67103 TZ-Partic Agr Dev 8 Empwrmnt SIL (FY03) MS MS 2003 56.6 ~049838 TZ-Prlvatization & Priv Sec Dev (FYOO) S S 2000 45.9 PO60833 TZ-Pub Sec Reform Prgm (FYOO) S S 2000 41.2 PO02770 TZ-Roads 2 (FY94) S S 1994 170.2 PO47762 TZ-Rural Water Sply (FY02) S MS 2002 26.0 ~08308o TZ-Sec Edu Dev Prj (FY04) S MS 2004 123.6 PO85786 TZ-Soc Action Fund 2 SIL (FY05) S S 2005 125.0 PO02797 TZ-Songo Gas Dev & Power Gen (FY02) MU MS 2002 183.0 PO47761 TZ-Tax Administration (FY99) S S 1999 40.0 PO87256 TZ PRSC3 S S 2006 150.0 Overall Result 1531.7 - 78 - TANZANIA STATEMENTOF IFC's HeldandDisbursedPortfolio InMillionsofUSDollars Committed Disbursed IFC IFC FY Approval Company Loan Equity Quasi Partic. Loan Equity Quasi Partic. 1991 AEF Aquva Ginner 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 2001 AEF Boundary Hi1 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 1998 AEF MajiMasafi 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 2002 EximBank 2.08 0.00 1.oo 0.00 2.08 0.00 1.oo 0.00 1996 IHP 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 2000 IOH 2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 2000 NBC 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.63 0.00 0.00 1993 TPS (Tanzania) 3.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 1991 TPS Zanzibar 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 1994 TanzaniaBrewery 0.00 3.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.43 0.00 0.00 Totalportfolio: 9.48 13.43 1.oo 0.00 9.48 7.06 1.oo 0.00 ApprovalsPendingCommitment FY Approval Company Loan Equity Quasi Partic. Totalpendingcommitment: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 79 - ANNEX 14: TANZANIAAT A GLANCE Tanzania at a glance a13m Sub Saharan LOW- Africa in- 38.3 741 2353 3w 745 580 12.6 552 1,384 2.0 23 1 9 2.2 23 2 3 36 24 35 30 46 46 59 L 78 100 80 29 26 39 Accessto improvedwater source I - 62 56 75 6s 62 106 93 104 -Tanzania 108 99 110 iavincomeorwp 104 87 99 1985 1985 2004 zoo5 5.3 I 13 121 19.8 184 189 20.7 178 171 1.9 8 5 9 7 -0.1 80 9 3 -19.9 -12 2 -128 1.6 0 4 141.2 690 3.1 21.1 59 I 9 9 1122 1985-95 199505 zoo4 2005 Ma5-09 2.5 5.4 6.7 70 7 4 -0.9 3.2 4.7 50 5 9 17.8 2.3 -7.0 -10 5 7 1985 1995 2004 zoo5 GranthofrspitalandGDP(K) I 47.1 46.2 445 I " 1 14.5 16.7 17.8 7.2 70 7 5 38.4 37 1 37 6 I ':G I 86.6 78.7 768 11.5 12.8 13.6 J8.6 27 7 26.3 2 9 482 1 60 -09 I01 112 -0 3 6.3 86 9 0 13 53 60 6 7 - 80 - 1985 1995 2004 33.3.. 28.4 00 8.6 26.9 a i 3.7 .._ 11.0 118 13.0 . -2.3 -35 4.4 5.2 9.5 -10.8 1985 1995 2004 2005 287 593 1,175 1,457 119 143 41 66 30 120 38 98 33 109 95 120 946 1,510 2,826 85 2,366 97 257 203 227 186 461 Mxl 390 802 877 1,069 80 105 108 120 102 141 133 149 78 74 81 81 :m 1985 1995 2004 2005 445 1,089 1.911 2704 1,016 2,029 3.231 4.212 -571 -640 -1,320 -1.507 -93 -125 68 -50 148 18 8 6 -10 -516 -1,047 -1,380 -1.551 531 1,093 1.m 1.763 -14 -46 -241 -212 16 270 2.049 I,0893 2286 17.5 574.8 1,1289 %I85 1995 2004 9,105 7,421 7.800 268 87 0 0 568 2,182 3,916 3.861 174 233 119 40 42 3 n 7 28 41 93 I 1 267 451 1,272 54 121 380 46 15 -4 15 120 249 0 0 0 45 11 393 46 2 7 4160 343 275 6 16 62 18 114 327 213 20 24 28 31 -1 90 299 182 - 81 - - 82 - MAP SECTION IBRD 33113R TUNISIA MOROCCO ALGERIA LIBYA ARAB REP. FORMER OF EGYPT SPANISH SAHARA THE MAURITANIA GAMBIA MALI NIGER SENEGAL CHAD ERITREA BURKINA SUDAN GUINEA- FASO DJIBOUTI BISSAU GUINEA BENIN NIGERIA SOMALIA SIERRA ETHIOPIA LEONE CÔTE D'IVOIRE GHANA TOGO CENTRAL LIBERIA AFRICAN REP. CAMEROON EQ. GUINEA UGANDA SÃO TOMÉ AND PRÍNCIPE CONGO KENYA GABON DEM. REP. RWANDA OF CONGO BURUNDI AT L A N T I C I N D I A N TANZANIA O C E A N O C E A N COMOROS AFRICA ANGOLA ZAMBIA MALAWI OBSOLETE PESTICIDES STOCKPILES ESTIMATES* MOZAMBIQUE ZIMBABWE MADAGASCAR NOT QUANTIFIED NAMIBIA BOTSWANA MAURITIUS 0­50 TONS SWAZILAND 50­500 TONS SOUTH LESOTHO 500­1000 TONS AFRICA OVER 1000 TONS This map was produced by the Map Design Unit of The World Bank. The boundaries, colors, denominations and any other information shown on this map do not imply, on the part of The World Bank Group, any judgment on the legal status of any territory, or any endorsement or * Source: FAO data. Does not reflect possibly significant quantities of contaminated soil in Mali and several other countries acceptance of such boundaries. MAY 2005 IBRD 34040 TUNISIA MOROCCO ALGERIA LIBYA ARAB REP. FORMER OF EGYPT SPANISH SAHARA THE MAURITANIA GAMBIA MALI NIGER SENEGAL CHAD ERITREA BURKINA SUDAN GUINEA- FASO DJIBOUTI BISSAU GUINEA BENIN NIGERIA SOMALIA SIERRA ETHIOPIA LEONE CÔTE D'IVOIRE GHANA TOGO CENTRAL LIBERIA AFRICAN REP. CAMEROON EQ. GUINEA UGANDA SÃO TOMÉ AND PRÍNCIPE CONGO KENYA GABON DEM. REP. RWANDA OF CONGO BURUNDI AT L A N T I C I N D I A N TANZANIA O C E A N O C E A N COMOROS ANGOLA ZAMBIA MALAWI MOZAMBIQUE ZIMBABWE MADAGASCAR AFRICA NAMIBIA STOCKPILES PROGRAMME BOTSWANA MAURITIUS SWAZILAND ASP-P1 PARTICIPANT COUNTRIES SOUTH LESOTHO ASP-P2 CANDIDATE COUNTRIES AFRICA This map was produced by the Map Design Unit of The World Bank. The boundaries, colors, denominations and any other information shown on this map do not imply, on the part of The World Bank Group, any judgment on the legal status of any territory, or any endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. JULY 2005