81300 enGender Impact: The World Bank’s Gender Impact Evaluation Database Does piped water reduce diarrhea for children in rural India? Author(s) Jyotsna Jalan, Martin Ravallion Contact jjalan@isid1.isid.ac.in Country India Organizing Theme Health Status N/A Intervention Category Water Sector Environment The impacts of public investments that directly improve children’s health are theoretically ambiguous given that the outcomes also depend on parentally provided inputs. Using propensity score matching methods, we find that the prevalence and duration of diarrhea among children under five in rural India are significantly lower on average for families with Abstract piped water than for observationally identical households without it. However, our results indicate that the health gains largely by-pass children in poor families, particularly when the mother is poorly educated. Our findings point to the importance of combining water infrastructure investments with effective public action to promote health knowledge and income poverty reduction. Gender Connection Gender Informed Analysis Gender Outcomes Sanitation, child health IE Design Propensity Score Matching The study examines the impact of piped water. The study does not focus on a specific Intervention program, instead it measures the aggregate impact of piped water on child health. Intervention Period N/A The sample is comprised of a nationally representative survey of 33,000 rural households Sample population from 1765 villages in 16 states in India. The sample includes 9000 households with piped water and 24000 households with no piped water. Comparison conditions The study compares households with piped water to households without piped water Unit of analysis Child Level Evaluation Period 1993-1994 There is a significant positive impact of piped water on diarrhea prevalence and duration in Results children under five. There are no health gains from piped water amongst the poorest 40% of the population. Health gains also are smaller for households with less-educated mothers. The study defines having piped water as access either in the house or from a nearby public Primary study limitations tap. A concern is that there may be real difference between having water in a house vs. Last updated: 14 August 2013 1 enGender Impact: The World Bank’s Gender Impact Evaluation Database public tap. There may be selection of access to water based on unobservables which are not controlled for with PSM. Funding Source Jalan, J., & Ravallion, M. (2003). Does piped water reduce diarrhea for children in rural Reference(s) India?. Journal of econometrics, 112(1), 153-173. Link to Studies http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304407602001586 Microdata Last updated: 14 August 2013 2