E2944 v3 ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) CHAPTER 9: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 390 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) CHAPTER 9: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN The Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) presented in this chapter reflects the implementation procedures and mechanisms for the mitigation measures and monitoring activities of the expected impacts previously discussed in Chapter 6 and 7. The ESMP assigns certain tasks for different stakeholders according to their roles and responsibilities in the project. The roles of supervision and monitoring for the implementation of the various impacts are presented in the matrixes/tables from 9.2 to 9.17. Generally, the information presented in these matrices applies to both the southern and northern sites. Where specific impacts and mitigation measure relate to certain specific site, it is mentioned in the matrix. The ESMP is adding on the FS recommendation for the project management, which comprise the following main features: • A Project Development and Safeguards Unit (PDSU) will be established for managing the investments and provide overall supervision on the project progress. The FS recommends that the PDSU shall be under the auspices of the UNDP-PAPP or the MLDF. • Two Joint Services Councils (JSC) will be responsible for the project operation during the first years of operation, one will be for North Gaza and the other will be for South Gaza including Deir Al-Balah and Rafah (JSC-DBR). The North Gaza JSC (JSC-NG) will be responsible for the operation of the solid waste management system (collection, transfer and disposal at Johr El Deek landfill) for the waste of North Gaza, Gaza Municipality and UNRWA camps in correspondent areas. While the JSC-DBR will be responsible for the operation of solid waste management system (collection, transfer, composting/recycling and disposal at El Fukhary landfill) for the waste of Deir Al Balah, Khan Yonus, Rafah and UNRWA camps in correspondent areas. It would be expected that the PDSU will assign a contractor, at the first stages of the project, for construction of landfills service areas (administration building, leachate pond, parking area and truck washing area) recycling/composting plants and transfer stations, in addition to excavation of the first cell of the two long-term landfills (and subsequently other cells in due course), preparing the roads, placing the liners and digging the monitoring wells. The work shall be under supervision of engineering consultants who shall approve the contractor’s performance for releasing his payments. The PDSU is expected also to procure landfill equipment, transfer and collection trucks and different electrometrical components from correspondent suppliers. The operation of the system shall be carried out by the two JSCs as mentioned earlier. The roles and responsibilities of the ESMP have been recommended based on the previous setting. 9.1 Institutional Setting of the ESMP The PDSU shall include an Environmental Manager (PDSU-EM) who will have the overall responsibility for implementing the ESMP and shall report directly to the PDSU Manager. During the construction phase (before starting the operation) the contract of the Engineering Consultant (EC), who will supervise construction work, should include supervision component on the relevant mitigation measures that will be implemented by the construction contractor. The EC representative in each construction site should report directly to the PDSU-EM about the performance of the 391 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) contractor in implementing ESMP measures during his work, the approval of the contractor’s invoices should include the signature of the PDSU-EM based on the reports he receives about the contractor performance in implementing the ESMP measures. The PDSU-EM should not totally depend on the reports he receives from the EC, but he should also make site visits on regular basis to confirm the reports he receives about the implementation of the ESMP measures by the construction contractor. The two JSCs would be under the supervision of a Ramallah – (West Bank-) basedSWM Development Committee (DC). It would include representatives of the ministries, UNDP, MDLF, JSC and other key stakeholders. Efficient implementation for the social management plan should involve tailored efforts for maximizing the positive social impacts and ensuring that they are reaching the local communities and minimizing the negative impacts that may hit the poor and vulnerable groups. The potentially- affected groups (particularly waste pickers, land owners and communities near the proposed facilities) should be consulted along the process in order to ensure that their views are considered and that suitable measures are in place to eliminate the severity of negative impacts. Efficient consultations with stakeholders and high level of participation are seen as a prerequisite for a successful ESMP. it is strongly recommended to appoint a Social Development Officer (SDO) within the PDSU. The SDO should be leading the various participatory activities. During the operation phase each of the two JSC managers (JSCM) of the landfill sites will generally be responsible for implementing mitigation measures and monitoring activities. During the first six years of operation, the two JSCMs will supervise the ESMP measures at the two sites in addition to the correspondent transfer stations and the composting/recycling plants., they will report to the PDSU-EM. Following the first six years of operation , it is expected that the PDSU will cease to operate and its responsibilities will be transferred to the JSC. During the after closure phase the two JSC should provide the resources sufficient of timely implementing monitoring activities. The monitoring activities referred to above represent self or internal monitoring , it is expected that compliance/regulatory monitoring will be also performed by MEnA or other relevant ministries as will be indicated later in Tables 9-3 to 9-14. 9.2 Roles and Responsibilities for Implementation and Supervision The mitigation measures and monitoring activities that were recommended in Chapter 6 and 7 shall be implemented according to the above-mentioned institutional set-up. Environmental Management and Monitoring matrices have been prepared for the actions to be carried during design, construction, operation and after closure phase. The matrices present the responsibilities of different stakeholders for mitigation measures and monitoring activities for both the landfill site (including the composting/recycling plants) and the related transfer stations. These matrices are presented in Tables 9-3 to 9-14. The reporting of ESMP measures should be done on monthly basis during construction, operation and after closure phases, and should be prepared either by the EC or the JSCM for correspondent 392 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) phase of the project. The monthly reports will be presented to the PDSU-EM who shall make sure that the ESMP measures are implemented in due course according to the progress report. The PDSU-EM should report for the PDSU Manager and the project Steering Committee on annual basis. In case a corrective action is needed the PDSU-EM should ask the PDSU Manager for the resources to take this corrective action and should adequately report this corrective action. These reports should include the following components: • Monthly reports prepared by EC and submitted to PDSU-EM: • Monthly reports prepared by JSCM and submitted to PDSU-EM: • Annual report prepared by the PDSU-EM and submitted to the PDSU Manager and the Steering Committee. The specific roles and responsibilities of the SDO planned to be appointed under the PDSU are presented in Box 9.1 Below. Box 9.1 Key responsibilities of the Social Development Officer (SDO) • Establish dialogue with project affected groups, including local communities in the TS and landfills sites, landowners and waste pickers and ensure the project is implemented in a socially sensitive manner that consider the interests of these groups. • Monitor the project performance and report challenges and propose measures to improve project performance. • Design and implement awareness raising campaigns • Facilitate the formation of various community based mechanisms including community-based monitoring committee and social committee as part of implantation of the ARAP. • Prepare ToRs for the formed community based mechanisms, share with the members of the committees and follow the performance of these committees. • Close facilitation for the execution of the ARAP and ensuring that compensations are reaching the PAPs. • Maintain databases and efficient records for the PAPs as part of the ARAP • Maintain database and efficient records of the waste pickers and work to integrate them in the various programmes and interventions to minimize the potential negative impact on them. • Prepare ToRs for external consultants that could be needed during the project cycle and follow up on the delivery of the consultancy service. • Assist in developing strategies for the implementing the long term measures (e.g. raising the profile of SWM, develop and enforce financial sustainability instruments) • Ensure adapting participatory mechanisms in monitoring the project impacts and evaluating outcomes • Prepare quarterly progress reports and raise it to the PDSU and report to the World Bank where applicable. Coordinate with other successful models (e.g. the model of Al-Menya Landfill in the West Bank) to benefit from the experience and lesson learnt The SDO should have a degree in social science or social development practice. He/she should be familiar with work in projects with similar scope and has very high communication and facilitation skills. Local university graduates, particularly women, should be encouraged to apply. To enable the SDO to efficiently fulfill his/her responsibilities, the capacity building and training modules 393 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) presented in Box 9.2 are proposed. The SDO should receive these capacity building programmes before start of the construction phase of the project. Box 9.2 Proposed Capacity Building Programmes for the SDO • OP 4.12 and Palestinian laws related to land ownership • Communication Skills • Community Participation Tools • Consensus Building Techniques • Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation (PM&E) • Promotion of Awareness Raising Activities Moreover, the implementation of the ESMP involves other voluntary community-based mechanisms to assist the SDO in reaching local communities and to facilitate access to information and feedbacks. It is suggested to benefit from existing mechanisms like the voluntary “Districts Committees� by involving them and activating their roles wherever applicable. These committees are composed of trustworthy individuals in their communities. The members should also be motivated and willing to contribute to the project with time and effort. It is suggested to form 1 voluntary Community- Based Monitoring committees in the area of Al Fukhary landfill and work to activate the role of exiting “Districts Committees� in the other 3 communities near the transfer stations. Moreover, additional voluntary Community- Based Monitoring committees in the area of Johr al Deek landfill and other 2 communities near the transfer stations are also recommended to be formed. The PDSU should facilitate the establishment/activation of the following voluntary community based committees: 1. Voluntary Community- Based Monitoring Committee from El-Fukhary and Al Buyuki community near El-Fukhary Landfill. 2. Voluntary Community- Based Monitoring Committee from Al Namsawi 3. Voluntary Community- Based Monitoring Committee from Tal El Sultan 4. Voluntary Community- Based Monitoring Committee from Deir El Balah (from the nearest area close to the TS site after it is identified) 5. Voluntary Community- Based Monitoring Committee from Johr al Deek neighboring community to the Landfill. 6. Voluntary Community- Based Monitoring Committee from Beit Lahia 7. Voluntary Community- Based Monitoring Committee from Al Maslakh The nomination and selection of the Committee members should be done in coordination between the municipalities/JSC and the PDSU. The section should also be done in consultation with the neighboring communities. The appropriate selection mechanisms for the Committees should be designed by the SDO of the PDSU. It is suggested that every voluntary Community- Based Monitoring Committee should include a balanced representation of various community groups including trustworthy community leaders, residents representing different economic and professional background, various age groups (including youth), representatives of commercial activities, NGOs, women, schools and other educational institutes health care institutes …etc. It worth noting that the formed committees with the assistance of the PDSU will play the role of the non- technical monitoring including all the monitoring aspects related to communities feedbacks, complaints and measuring satisfaction levels. 394 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Box 9.3 Key responsibilities for the Community- Based Monitoring committees • Facilitate the PDSU and the SDO access to the local communities • Conduct various surveys and consultation activities as part of engaging local communities in monitoring the project various phases and assessing various impacts. • Assist in the delivery of awareness raising campaigns • Facilitate the consultancy assignments arranged for different purposes during the project cycle through the provision of data and assistance and connecting consultants to local communities • Coordinate with local organizations to facilities the access of the neighborhoods near the project sites to services. It should be the responsibility of the PDSU to work to strengthen the capacity of the members of these committees in order to enable them to fulfill their proposed responsibilities above. It is recommended that the SDO invests time in providing hands-on training and transferring experience to the committees’ members. Subjects of the hands-on training may include, but are not limited to, communication and community surveying skills, delivering of awareness messages, measuring changes in behavior and writing report. Moreover and as part of the supervisory role anticipated by the Palestinian regulatory authority, it is recommended that capacity building and training programmes be developed to target the staff that will be involved in supervising the project. Box 9.4 blow presents a generic list of the topics that could be included in the capacity building modules for regulatory authority. Box 9.4: Generic tentative list of the key capacity building modules for regulatory authorities • SWM cycle and relation to environment and local communities • ESMP implementation for SWM projects • Inspection on landfill sites • Labour standards and conducting site inspections • Health and safety standards and conducting site inspections 9.3 ESMP Budget The ESMP matrices presented in Tables 9-3 to 9-14 includes many items that needs to be allocated in the final budget of the project. Because the project is basically an environmental project the distinction between the budget for engineering works and environmental safeguard measures is difficult because ultimately the whole project will have clear environmental and social benefits. For distinguishing the ESMP budget from other cost items needed to implement the project, it has been assumed that all the measures included in Tables 9-3 to 9-14 are included in the project budget except for the following items (related to project management, capacity building, consultancy awareness and compensations for the resulting involuntary resettlement) presented in Table 9-2, that may be considered distinct from the pure engineering components of the project. Table 9 -1: Proposed Budget for the ESMP Category Item Budget (US $) 395 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Project Salary of the PDSU Manager in 6 years X 2 offices 216,000 management 63 Salary of the PDSU-EM in 6 years X 2 offices 144,000 Salary for the SDO in 6 years X 2 offices 144,000 Capacity building Capacity Development for the SDO 20,000 Training courses on Hygiene and Hazardous Waste 40,000 Management for project staff Capacity building and training activities for staff of 100,000 the regulatory Ministries including MEnA, MoH, MoL, MDLF Consultancy Contracting consulting firm for carrying out 200,000 environmental/social audit for the project performance and recommending improvement measures (3 audits in 6 years) Allowance for contracting experts in some needed 120,000 ESMP measures, such as pesticides consultant, groundwater expert, energy expert, safety expert … etc. Consultancy services (strategy for raising SWM 200,000 profile in GS and strategies for developing financial instruments) Awareness Designing and implementing awareness raisin 80,000 campaigns Compensations Transition assistance for the waste pickers of Al 126,420 64 Namsawi and Tal El Sultan (southern section) Transition assistance for the waste pickers of Al 192,640 65 Maslakh and Beit Lahia (northern section) ARAP for landowners at El-Fukhary landfill 8,876,500 66 ARAP for landowners at Johr al Deek landfill 8,660,000 67 ARAP for waste pickers in El-Fukhary landfill 228,600 68 63 The implementation of Gaza SWMP will be divided into two separate projects; El Fukhary implemented by the MDLF and JaD implemented by the UNDP which requires two separate PDSUs that needs to be mentioned and considered in the required personnel of the PDSUs and in turn the cost. 64 This was calculated on the basis of : C) Cash Assistance: 21 waste picker x USD 230/ month (as transition allowance) x 24 month (transition period) = USD 115,920 D) Capacity development (hands on training): 21 waste picker x USD 500/training = USD 10,500 65 This was calculated on the basis of : B) Cash Assistance: 32 waste picker x USD 230/ month (as transition allowance) x 24 month (transition period) = USD 176,640 B) Capacity development (hands on training): 32 waste picker x USD 500/training = USD 16,000 66 This figure was suggested by the ARAP against calculating not only the areas needed for the project but the actual areas owned by landowners who showed interest in selling to the project. Securing additional land is recommended from environmental and social point of view. The figure also counted for an amount of USD 50,000 for external monitoring to be provided for the resettlement process 67 This include the estimated cost of average market price for purchasing the land space needed for the landfill, estimated figure for compensation for the rest of land located adjacent to the buffer zone and will not be used by the project and an amount of USD 50,000 for external monitoring to be provided for the resettlement process 396 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) ARAP for waste pickers in Johr al Deek landfill 419,100 69 Total 19,767,260 It is worth noting that the following ESMP related items are already included in the project budget presented in the Feasibility Study: - Base sealing and leachate collection and recirculation - Surface sealing, final cover and re-cultivation layer - Gas collection and flaring - Surface water collection and retention - Internal roads preparation and pavement - Groundwater monitoring wells - Roofs for waste areas in the recycling plant, composting plant and transfer stations - Landfill vehicles and equipment for waste and cover laying (loaders, compactors … etc.) - Project management costs including staff salaries, consumables and O&P of equipment The following items are also expected to be included in the project budget, however, they are not specifically identified in the Feasibility Study Areas for spoil storage Considered above Additional waste containers to safeguard against emergency situation when two containers access to the landfill is denied 14,000$ Windbreak trees surrounding the landfill site and the leachate evaporation 30,000$ pond Adequate PPE for the staff 6,000 $/year Firefighting equipment 90,000$ Application of pesticides 10,000$ Possible need for movable acoustic barriers 3,000$ Project management costs, staff salaries, consumables and O&P of 300,000 $/year equipment after the closure of the two landfills Source of water for possible need for watering the soil before excavation Stored works surface/run-off water Laboratory to carry out soil, gas and noise monitoring activities 7500$ recommended in the ESMP – during the construction phase as part of the project budget. Laboratory to carry out leachate, groundwater, gas and noise monitoring 7500$/year 68 This allocation could be provided by several projects and it will be the responsibility of the PDSU with the assistance of community based mechanisms to ensure that they are assisting the affected waste pickers in finding an institution that can secure funds for assisting the waste pickers This was calculated on the basis of: Initial cost for micro grants for the PAPs to start small business: USD 10,000 x 18 waste pickers = 180,000 + Monthly salary of 450 US$ for 6 moths transition period x 18 families = 48,600 (Total = 228,600) 69 This was calculated on the basis of: Initial cost for micro grants for the PAPs to start small business: USD 10,000 x 33 waste pickers = 330,000 + Monthly salary of 450 US$ for 6 moths transition period x 33 families = 89,100 (Total = 419,100) 397 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) activities recommended in the ESMP as part of the project budget. Construction of six groundwater wells (three at each landfill) 24,000 $ 398 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Table 9-2: Environmental management matrix for the landfill site during design phase Responsi bility of Institutio indirect Responsi nal supervisi bility Proposed Mitigation Responsi Potential on of direct Means of Measures bility for Impact (During supervisio supervision Impleme the n ntation course of the ESIA study) ECS Review of Allocate adequate areas for Design MDLF, final design spoil storage in the final Consulta UNDP, and tender design nt JSCs documents ECS Review of Impacts of Ensure that the spoil will not Design MDLF, final design Excavated cause un-favored changes to Consulta UNDP, and tender Soil surface water drainage nt JSCs documents ECS Review of The spoil height should be Design MDLF, final design designed so as to have Consulta UNDP, and tender acceptable visual impacts nt JSCs documents Detailed design to include ECS landfill operation manual Review of Design MDLF, Odour identifying waste progression final design Consulta UNDP, impacts in cells, waste compaction and tender nt JSCs requirements and daily cover documents (at least 15 cm) The detailed design and ECS tender documents of the degassing system should be Review of designed to handle the Design MDLF, Impacts of final design maximum gas volumes with Consulta UNDP, landfill gas and tender operational manuals for nt JSCs documents handling low gas volumes and implementing maintenance schedules Include the proposed leachate ECS collection system in the Review of Impacts of Design MDLF, design and tender documents. final design leachate and Consulta UNDP, The design should include and tender surface water nt JSCs maintenance schedule for the documents system 399 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Responsi bility of Institutio indirect Responsi nal supervisi bility Proposed Mitigation Responsi Potential on of direct Means of Measures bility for Impact (During supervisio supervision Impleme the n ntation course of the ESIA study) The leachate collection pond ECS and the pumping station Review of Design MDLF, should be designed to receive final design Consulta UNDP, maximum expected leachate and tender nt JSCs quantities with minimum documents retention time Transfer stations and ECS Review of composting/recycling plants Design MDLF, final design should have adequate roofs to Consulta UNDP, and tender prevent rain water from nt JSCs documents getting to the waste MDLF ECS and JSCs Review Impacts on Obtain written approval from (This has written Birds and on the Palestinian Civil Aviation been MDLF, approval and possible Authority stating that El investigat UNDP, include any future Fukhary landfill site is ed by JSCs conditions in operation of considered to be non- EcoConS the detailed Gaza Airport hazardous to civil aviation erv as design shown in ) Risks of Coordinate with planning ECS Review receiving authorities and the donor MDLF, reports and hazardous community to initiate a MDLF UNDP, progress wastes mixed project for hazardous waste JSCs meetings with management municipal ECS Review The landfill operation manual Design MDLF, waste (these design and should include list of accepted consultan UNDP, measures tender and non accepted waste t JSCs shall be in document 400 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Responsi bility of Institutio indirect Responsi nal supervisi bility Proposed Mitigation Responsi Potential on of direct Means of Measures bility for Impact (During supervisio supervision Impleme the n ntation course of the ESIA study) case that the In case that the landfill will ECS project will operate without parallel Review operate with hazardous waste facility a Design MDLF, design and no parallel special cell should be consultan UNDP, tender hazardous constructed. The cell already t JSCs document waste existing at Johr al Deek shall project) resume operation. Noise ECS Tender documents should impacts of Design MDLF, Review include noise specification for recycling/co consultan UNDP, tender trommel, conveyors and mposting t JSCs document compost mixing equipment plant ECS Review of Identify a sufficient low Design MDLF, Impacts of final design elevation area to evaporate Consulta UNDP, surface water and tender collected storm water nt JSCs documents ECS Review of Detailed design should take Design MDLF, Stability final design into consideration the stresses Consulta UNDP, impacts and tender on soil and on the waste body nt JSCs documents Table 9-3: Environmental management matrix for transfer station sites during design phase Potential Proposed Mitigation Instituti Responsi Responsi Means of Impact Measures onal bility bility supervision Respons of of direct ibility indirect supervisi for supervisi on on Implem (During entation the course of the ESIA study) Odour Detailed design to include Design ECS MDLF, Review of 401 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) impacts transfer station operation Consulta ECS, final design manual identifying waste nt UNDP, and tender unloading procedure through JSCs documents a hopper Detailed design of the transfer Design ECS MDLF, Review of station to include area for Consulta ECS, final design additional containers to nt UNDP, and tender accommodate waste in case of JSCs documents over capacity and emergency situations where there may be no access to the landfill Impacts of Transfer stations should have Design ECS MDLF, Review of leachate and adequate roofs to prevent rain Consulta ECS, final design surface water water from getting to the nt UNDP, and tender waste JSCs documents Table 9-4: Environmental management matrix for composting plants during design phase Potential Proposed Institutional Responsibility Responsibility Means of Impact Mitigation Responsibility of indirect of direct supervision Measures for supervision supervision Implementation (During the course of the ESIA study) Odour Detailed design Design ECS MDLF, ECS, Review of impacts to include Consultant UNDP, JSCs final design composting plant and tender process control documents identifying temperature and air flow control methodology and tools as well as measurement tools for the oxygen availability in the composting piles. Impacts Composting Design ECS MDLF, ECS, Review of of plants should be Consultant UNDP, JSCs final design leachate designed to have and tender and adequate roofs to documents 402 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Potential Proposed Institutional Responsibility Responsibility Means of Impact Mitigation Responsibility of indirect of direct supervision Measures for supervision supervision Implementation (During the course of the ESIA study) surface prevent rain water water from getting to the waste. A leachate collection and stoage system should be incorporated into the design. 403 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Table 9-5: Environmental management matrix for the landfill site during construction phase Potential Proposed Institutional Responsibility Responsibility Means of Impact Mitigation Responsibility of direct of regulatory supervision Measures for supervision supervision Implementation Affecting air Spoil of soil to Contractor EC N/A Field quality by be reused supervision dust should be emissions of stored as near construction as possible works from active cell Pavement of Contractor EC N/A Field access road supervision and ring road prior to usage in construction of each cell Watering soil Contractor EC MEnA (EQA) Field before supervision excavation if there were complaints from neighbors Noise Optimize the Contractor EC MEnA (EQA) Field impacts use of noisy supervision equipment Use acoustic Contractor EC MEnA (EQA) Field barriers as supervision necessary if complaints from neighbors were received Construction Contractor EC MEnA (EQA) Field works should supervision be stopped during night Impacts of Ensure the Contractor EC MEnA (EQA) Field landfill gas lining system supervision is adequately placed and tested Impacts of Leachate Contractor EC MEnA (EQA) Field 404 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Potential Proposed Institutional Responsibility Responsibility Means of Impact Mitigation Responsibility of direct of regulatory supervision Measures for supervision supervision Implementation leachate and collection supervision surface pond should water be surrounded by wind barrier trees Risks of Coordinate MDLF MDLF N/A Review hazardous with planning reports and wastes authorities and progress the donor meetings community to initiate a project for hazardous waste management In case that Design MDLF N/A Review the landfill will consultant to design and operate prepare specs tender without and contractor to document parallel implement hazardous waste facility a special cell should be constructed Affecting air Implement Contractor EC MEnA (EQA) Field quality by preventive supervision vehicles and maintenance equipment program for emissions vehicles and equipment working in the site and promptly repair vehicles with visibly high exhaust Impacts of Hazardous Contractor EC MEnA (EQA) Field construction waste should supervision waste other be segregated than and sent to a excavated hazardous soil waste facility, 405 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Potential Proposed Institutional Responsibility Responsibility Means of Impact Mitigation Responsibility of direct of regulatory supervision Measures for supervision supervision Implementation if existing, or to the special cell Other non Contractor EC MEnA (EQA) Field hazardous supervision waste to be collected and sent to the active cells Sewage should Contractor EC MEnA (EQA) Field be periodically supervision collected and sent to the adjacent WWTP Risks of In case of Contractor EC Ministry of Field damaging chance-find Tourism and supervision chance-find the excavation Antiquities antiquities should be stopped, the Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities Table 9-6 Environmental management matrix for transfer station and composting plant sites during construction phase Potential Proposed Institutional Responsibility Responsibility Means of Impact Mitigation Responsibility of direct of regulatory supervision Measures for supervision supervision Implementation Affecting air Watering soil Contractor EC MEnA (EQA) Field quality by before supervision dust excavation if emissions of there were construction complaints works from neighbors Noise Optimize the Contractor EC MEnA (EQA) Field impacts use of noisy supervision equipment Use acoustic Contractor EC MEnA (EQA) Field barriers as supervision necessary if 406 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Potential Proposed Institutional Responsibility Responsibility Means of Impact Mitigation Responsibility of direct of regulatory supervision Measures for supervision supervision Implementation complaints from neighbors were received Construction Contractor EC MEnA (EQA) Field works should supervision be stopped during night Affecting air Implement Contractor EC MEnA (EQA) Field quality by preventive supervision vehicles and maintenance equipment program for emissions vehicles and equipment working in the site and promptly repair vehicles with visibly high exhaust Impacts of Hazardous Contractor EC MEnA (EQA) Field construction waste should supervision waste be segregated and sent to a hazardous waste facility, if existing, or to the special cell Other non Contractor EC MEnA (EQA) Field hazardous supervision waste to be collected and sent to the active cells Sewage should Contractor EC MEnA (EQA) Field be periodically supervision collected and sent to WWTP 407 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Table 9-7: Environmental monitoring matrix for the landfill site during construction phase Potential Monitoring Monitorin Monitorin Monitoring Monitoring Impact Indicator g Methods g Responsibility Location Frequenc Self Regulato y (Internal ry ) (External ) Impacts of Volume of Site of Review To be N/A Excavated excavated soil landfill invoices of recorded soil excavation after the contractor excavation of each cell and EC documente d in the next monthly report COD, BOD, pH, Site of the Active Once prior MEnA TDS, total N, landfill collection of to the (EQA) total P, heavy undisturbed excavation metals soil samples of each Landfill (Pb,Cd,Cr,Cu,Hg, and cell laborator Ni, Zn), TPH of laboratory y the soluble analysis content of excavated soil Volume of soil Site of Keeping Annual N/A exported from the landfill these records PDSU- site and end use from the EM, of this volume exporting entity Affecting Ambient PM Border of Active Once MEnA air quality active cell collection of during the (EQA) by dust and the samples and excavation Landfill emissions two farm laboratory of each laborator of houses analysis cell y constructi areas at on works the north and west Dust complaints Landfill Recording Monthly MEnA from neighbors location and (EQA) PDSU documentatio EM, n of complaints Noise Ambient noise The two Portable Once Landfill MEnA 408 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Potential Monitoring Monitorin Monitoring Monitorin Monitoring Impact Indicator g Methods g Responsibility Location Frequenc Self Regulato y (Internal ry ) (External ) impacts farm noise meter before laborator (EQA) houses to take constructi y areas at representative on and the north average noise once and west and during the background excavation noise before of each construction cell works Noise complaints Landfill Recording Monthly MEnA from neighbors location and (EQA) PDSU documentatio EM, n of complaints Impacts of Amounts of Landfill Visual Monthly MEnA constructi hazardous waste location estimation of (EQA) Contract on waste generated the hazardous or other than waste weight excavated by type soil Amounts of Landfill Number of Monthly MEnA evacuated sewage location truck loads (EQA) Contract multiplied to or the truck capacity Risks of Type, location, Landfill Documentati Once in Ministry damaging condition of on of data case of of chance- antiquity object and chance- Tourism EC find and followed photography finds and antiquities procedures Antiquitie s Table 9-8: Environmental monitoring matrix for transfer station and composting plant sites during construction phase Potential Monitoring Monitoring Monitoring Monitoring Monitoring Impact Indicator Location Methods Frequency Responsibility Self Regulatory (Internal) (External) Affecting air Dust Transfer Recording and Monthly PDSU MEnA(EQA) quality by complaints station documentation EM 409 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Potential Monitoring Monitoring Monitoring Monitoring Monitoring Impact Indicator Location Methods Frequency Responsibility dust from location of complaints emissions of neighbors construction works Noise Noise Transfer Recording and Monthly PDSU MEnA(EQA) impacts complaints station documentation EM from location of complaints neighbors Impacts of Amounts of Transfer Visual Monthly Contractor MEnA(EQA) construction hazardous station estimation of waste waste location the hazardous generated waste weight by type Amounts of Transfer Number of Monthly Contractor MEnA(EQA) evacuated station truck loads sewage location multiplied to the truck capacity 410 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Table 9-9: Environmental management matrix for the landfill site during operation phase Responsibility Responsibil of direct ity Means of Institutional supervision of supervision Proposed Responsibilit Potential (Internal) regulatory Mitigation y for Impact Durin Beyon supervision Measures Implementati g the d the on first 6 first 6 years years Upgrade the rates JSC MEnA Review of of compaction and (EQA) progress Odour application of soil PDSU JSCM reports and impacts cover in case of -EM field receiving supervision complaints Ensure the waste JSC MEnA filling schedule is (EQA) followed, the gas vents are Review of progressively progress Impacts of placed, the final PDSU JSCM reports and landfill gas cover is adequately -EM field maintained and supervision the degassing system is adequately maintained Leachate JSC MEnA Review of evaporation pond (EQA) progress PDSU should be JSCM reports and -EM Impacts of surrounded by field leachate wind barrier trees supervision and Implement JSC MEnA surface preventive (EQA) Review of water maintenance PDSU JSCM progress schedule for the -EM reports leachate collection system 411 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Responsibility Responsibil of direct ity Means of Institutional supervision of supervision Proposed Responsibilit Potential (Internal) regulatory Mitigation y for Impact Durin Beyon supervision Measures Implementati g the d the on first 6 first 6 years years For El-Fukhary JSC MEnA landfill , in case (EQA) some leachate amounts will need to be discharged to the WWTP a Review of prior coordination progress with the WWTP PDSU reports and management JSCM -EM corresponden should be ce with maintained. This WWTP should be also done for sludge being removed from evaporation pond and sent to WWTP In case the JSC MEnA monitoring wells (EQA) indicated high pollution loads Review that could be JSC experts or PDSU monitoring related to leak of an external -EM reports after leachate, this leak consultant repair should be identified and adequately handled For El- Fukhary JSC Palestinian Impacts landfill, implement Civil on Birds any conditions to Aviation Review of and on distract birds that Authority progress possible PDSU might be included JSCM reports and future -EM in the approval of field operation the Palestinian supervision of Gaza Civil Aviation Airport Authority 412 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Responsibility Responsibil of direct ity Means of Institutional supervision of supervision Proposed Responsibilit Potential (Internal) regulatory Mitigation y for Impact Durin Beyon supervision Measures Implementati g the d the on first 6 first 6 years years Risks of Provide hazardous JSC MEnA Review receiving Hazardous (EQA) training waste training to PDSU hazardous waste safety MoL reports and staff working in -EM wastes consultant attendance the project mixed sheets with JSC MEnA Review of Asbestos waste municipal (EQA) progress should be wetted PDSU waste JSCM reports and once received in -EM (these field the landfill measures supervision shall be in Flammable and JSC MEnA Review of case that explosive waste (EQA) progress PDSU the project should be JSCM reports and -EM will prevented from field operate admission supervision with no JSC MEnA Review of Provide workers parallel (EQA) progress hazardous with PPE and JSCM PDSU MoL reports and make sure they are -EM waste field adequately using it project) supervision Prepare an JSC MEnA emergency PDSU (EQA) Review of JSCM response plan for -EM MoL the plan spills or fires Provide hygiene JSC MEnA training to the (EQA) Review of staff working in MoL progress the project and PDSU JSCM reports and provide suitable -EM field Risks to PPE, showers, supervision occupatio washing and nal health cleansing facilities and Prevention of JSC MEnA hygiene unauthorized (EQA) Review of admission to the progress PDSU landfill, JSCM reports and -EM recycling/compost field ing and transfer supervision stations 413 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Responsibility Responsibil of direct ity Means of Institutional supervision of supervision Proposed Responsibilit Potential (Internal) regulatory Mitigation y for Impact Durin Beyon supervision Measures Implementati g the d the on first 6 first 6 years years JSC MEnA Review of Effective (EQA) progress application of the PDSU JSCM reports and waste filling plan -EM field and daily cover supervision Apply pesticides JSC MEnA as needed through (EQA) an application plan that would give preference to biological JSCM Review of pesticides, then to Pesticides and pesticides other pesticides Expert PDSU plan and field with negligible -EM supervision impact on humans and minimum impact on untargeted species and the environment JSC MEnA Review of (EQA) progress Optimize the use PDSU JSCM reports and of noisy machines -EM field supervision Use acoustic JSC MEnA Review of barriers as (EQA) progress necessary if PDSU Noise JSCM reports and complaints from -EM impacts field neighbors were supervision received Landfill operations JSC MEnA Review of and the (EQA) progress recycling/compost PDSU JSCM reports and ing plants should -EM field be stopped during supervision night 414 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Responsibility Responsibil of direct ity Means of Institutional supervision of supervision Proposed Responsibilit Potential (Internal) regulatory Mitigation y for Impact Durin Beyon supervision Measures Implementati g the d the on first 6 first 6 years years JSC MEnA Review of Planting wind (EQA) progress PDSU break trees around JSCM reports and -EM the landfill field supervision Implement JSC MEnA preventive (EQA) Affecting maintenance air quality program for Review of by air vehicles and progress PDSU emissions equipment JSCM reports and -EM of vehicles working in the site field and and promptly supervision equipment repair vehicles with visibly high exhaust JSC MEnA Review of Visual Surrounding (EQA) progress impacts composting/recycl PDSU JSCM reports and and ing plant with -EM field aesthetics windbreak trees supervision Risks of If landfill capacity JSC MEnA unforesee monitoring shown (EQA) Review n rapid filling, early PDSU JSCM monitoring exceeding planning for new -EM reports of landfill site should be capacity initiated Table 9-10: Environmental management matrix for transfer station sites during operation phase Potenti Proposed Institution Responsibility Responsi Means of al Mitigation al of direct supervision bility of supervisi 415 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Impact Measures Responsib (Internal) regulator on ility for During Beyond y Implemen the first 6 the first 6 supervisi tation years years on Odour Provide additional JSCM PDSU-EM JSC MEnA Review of impacts waste containers at (EQA) progress the transfer station reports to ensure smooth and field operation and reduce supervisio vehicles waiting time n Impacts Ensure that waste is JSCM PDSU-EM JSC MEnA Review of of unloaded in covered (EQA) progress leachate areas during rain reports and surface water Risks to Provide hygiene JSCM PDSU-EM, JSC MEnA Review of occupati training to the staff MoH, MoL (EQA) progress onal working in the MoL and reports health project and provide MoH and field and suitable PPE, supervisio hygiene showers, washing n and cleansing facilities Prevention of JSCM PDSU-EM JSC MoL and Review of unauthorized MoH progress admission to the reports transfer stations and field supervisio n Apply pesticides as Pesticides JSCM and JSC MEnA Review of needed through an Expert PDSU-EM (EQA) pesticides application plan that plan and would give field preference to supervisio biological pesticides, n then to other pesticides with negligible impact on humans and minimum impact on untargeted species and the environment 416 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Table 9-11: Environmental management matrix for composting plant sites during operation phase Potential Proposed Institution Responsibility Responsi Means of Impact Mitigation al of direct supervision bility of supervisi Measures Responsib During Beyond regulator on ility for the first 6 the first 6 y Implemen years years supervisi tation on Odour Provide a list of JSCM PDSU-EM JSC MEnA Review of impacts the types of (EQA) progress wastes that reports should be and field screened out supervisio from the input n stream. Ensure a process control is in place for the following: • Temperat ure control • Air flow control Impacts of Ensure that the JSCM PDSU-EM JSC MEnA Review of leachate composting plant (EQA) progress and surface is roofed and that reports water the leachate collection and storage system is in place. An impervious floor should be contructed with suitable slopes to allow for leachate collection. Risks to Provide hygiene JSCM PDSU-EM JSC MEnA Review of occupation training to the (EQA) progress al health staff working at MoL reports and the composting and field hygiene plant and provide supervisio suitable PPE, n showers, washing and cleansing facilities 417 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Potential Proposed Institution Responsibility Responsi Means of Impact Mitigation al of direct supervision bility of supervisi Measures Responsib During Beyond regulator on ility for the first 6 the first 6 y Implemen years years supervisi tation on Prevention of JSCM PDSU-EM JSC MoL Review of unauthorized progress admission to the reports composting plant and field supervisio n Table 9-12: Environmental monitoring matrix for the landfill site during operation phase Potenti Monitor Monitor Monitorin Monito Self Monitoring Regulatory/Com al ing ing g ring Responsibility pliance Impact Indicat Locatio Methods Freque During Beyond Monitoring or n ncy the first the first Responsibility 6 years 6 years Odour Odor Recording Landfill Monthly PDSU JSCM MEnA (EQA) impacts complai and location EM nts from document neighbo ation of rs complaints Impacts Volume Gas Gas flow Continu Landfill Landfill MEnA (EQA) of of compres meter ous laborator laborator landfill collectedsion monitori y y gas landfill station ng with gas monthly collectio n of records CH4, Samples Active Annual Landfill Landfill MEnA (EQA) CO2, to be collection laborator laborator NH3, collected of samples y y H2S and from the and VOCs in western laboratory ambient border analysis air of the landfill Acidity Monitori Pumping Quarterl Landfill Landfill MEnA (EQA) and ng wells out y laborator laborator hardness samples y y of 418 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Potenti Monitor Monitor Monitorin Monito Self Monitoring Regulatory/Com al ing ing g ring Responsibility pliance Impact Indicat Locatio Methods Freque During Beyond Monitoring or n ncy the first the first Responsibility 6 years 6 years groundw ater Impacts Amount Leachate Level Monthly JSCM JSCM MEnA (EQA) of of collectio measurem leachate collected n pond ent of the and and leachate surface recycled pond and water leachate records of amounts pumping station COD, Leachate Representa Quarterl Landfill Landfill MEnA (EQA) BOD, collectio tive grap y for laborator laborator pH, n pond sampling COD, y y TDS, and BOD total N, laboratory and pH total P, analysis and heavy annually metals, for the TPH of rest leachate COD, 3 Pumping Quarterl Landfill Landfill MEnA (EQA) BOD, groundw from y for laborator laborator pH, ater monitorin COD, y y TDS, monitori g wells and BOD total N, ng wells laboratory and pH total P, analysis and heavy annually metals, for the TPH of rest groundw ater Amount Leachate Records of Once JSCM JSCM MEnA (EQA) s of collectio sludge upon collected n pond pump de- sludge sludging event Impacts Complai Al Recording Monthly PDSU JSCM MEnA (EQA) on Birds nts from Fukhary and EM, and on the Landfill document possible airport location ation of future about complaints operatio imprope 419 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Potenti Monitor Monitor Monitorin Monito Self Monitoring Regulatory/Com al ing ing g ring Responsibility pliance Impact Indicat Locatio Methods Freque During Beyond Monitoring or n ncy the first the first Responsibility 6 years 6 years n of r Gaza operatio Airport nal practices Risks of Amount Landfill Visual Daily Admissio Admissio MEnA (EQA) hazardo s of location estimation n staff n staff us hazardo of the wastes us waste hazardous received waste in relation to the truck capacity Amount Landfill Visual Daily Admissio Admissio MEnA (EQA) s of location estimation n staff n staff flammab of the le and hazardous explosiv waste in e waste relation to refused the truck capacity Area Special Topograp Annual Survey Survey MEnA (EQA) and cell hic survey consulta consulta volume nt nt of hazardo us waste placed in special cell Health Clinic Medical Quarterl Occupati Occupati MEnA (EQA) records contract reporting y onal onal MoL about ed by on health health occupati the received clinic clinic onal project cases injuries and infectiou s diseases among workers 420 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Potenti Monitor Monitor Monitorin Self Monitoring Monito Regulatory/Com al ing ing g Responsibility ring pliance Impact Indicat Locatio Methods Freque During Beyond Monitoring or n ncy the first the first Responsibility 6 years 6 years Risks to Type, Landfill Document Monthly Pesticide Pesticide MEnA (EQA) occupati quantity, and ation of s Expert s Expert onal date, transfer data health location station and and hygiene method of applicati on of pesticide s Complai Landfill Recording Monthly PDSU JSCM MEnA (EQA) nts from location and EM neighbo document rs about ation of insects complaints and rodents Noise Ambient Portable The two Annual Landfill Landfill MEnA (EQA) impacts noise farm noise during laborator laborator meter to houses operatio y y take areas at n the representat northive average noise and west Noise Recording Landfill Monthly PDSU J MEnA (EQA) complai and location EM S nts from document C neighbo ation of M rs complaints Affectin Average Landfill Keeping Monthly PDSU- JSCM MEnA (EQA) g air CO2 and traveled EM quality emission transfer distance by s, station and vehicles traveled locations consumed emission distance fuel s and records consum from ed fuel vehicle of datasheet vehicles and multiply in 421 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Potenti Monitor Monitor Monitorin Monito Self Monitoring Regulatory/Com al ing ing g ring Responsibility pliance Impact Indicat Locatio Methods Freque During Beyond Monitoring or n ncy the first the first Responsibility 6 years 6 years the average CO2 emissions identified by the manufactu rer Visual Complai Landfill Recording Monthly PDSU JSCM MEnA (EQA) impacts nts from location and EM neighbo document rs about ation of littering complaints Risks of Filled Landfill Topograp Annual Survey Survey MEnA (EQA) unforese area and location hic survey consulta consulta en height nt nt exceedin of active g of cells landfill capacity 422 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Table 9-13: Environmental monitoring matrix for transfer station and composting plant sites during operation phase Potential Monitori Monito Monitori Monitor Self Monitoring Regulatory/ Impact ng ring ng ing Responsibility Compliance Indicator Locatio Methods Freque During Beyond Monitoring n ncy the frist the first 6 Responsibilit 6 years years y Odour Odor Transfe Recording Monthly PDSU JSCM MEnA (EQA) impacts complaint r and EM s from stations document neighbors and ation of compos complaint ting s plant location s Risks of Health Clinic Medical Quarterl Occupat Occupatio MEnA (EQA) hazardous records contract reporting y ional nal health MoL wastes about ed by on health clinic occupatio the received clinic nal project cases injuries and infectious diseases among workers Risks to Type, Transfe Document Monthly Pesticide Pesticides MEnA (EQA) occupatio quantity, r station ation of s Expert Expert nal health date, only data and location hygiene and method of applicatio n of pesticides Complain Transfe Recording Monthly PDSU JSC MEnA (EQA) ts from r station and EM M neighbors and document about compos ation of insects ting complaint and plants s rodents 423 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Table 9-14: Environmental management matrix after landfill closure Potential Proposed Institutional Responsibility Responsibility Means of Impact Mitigation Responsibility of direct of regulatory supervision Measures for supervision supervision Implementation Impacts Assign the JSC PDSU MEnA (EQA) Review of landfill responsibility Manager institutional gas for monitoring arrangements landfill gas to the same trained personnel who were responsible during the operation phase In case the JSC experts or an JSC MEnA (EQA) Review monitoring external monitoring indicated gas consultant reports after leak the reason repair for the leak should be identified and adequately handled Impacts Staff of leachate JSC PDSU MEnA (EQA) Review of pumping station Manager institutional leachate should continue arrangements their work after closure of the landfill so that maintenance and coordination with WWTP activities will be continued until leachate amounts are negligible Assign the JSC PDSU MEnA (EQA) Review responsibility Manager institutional for monitoring arrangements landfill leachate to the same trained personnel who were responsible 424 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Potential Proposed Institutional Responsibility Responsibility Means of Impact Mitigation Responsibility of direct of regulatory supervision Measures for supervision supervision Implementation during the operation phase until leachate amounts are negligible In case the JSC experts or an JSC MEnA (EQA) Review monitoring wells external monitoring indicated high consultant reports after pollution loads repair that could be related to leak of leachate, this leak should be identified and adequately handled Visual Plantation of JSC PDSU MEnA (EQA) Review impacts adequate plants Manager institutional over the final arrangements cover of the landfill and maintain it Table 9-15: Environmental monitoring matrix after landfill closure Potential Monitoring Monitoring Monitoring Monitoring Monitoring Impact Indicator Location Methods Frequency Responsibility Self Regulatory (Internal) (External) Impacts Volume of Gas Gas flow Continuous Landfill MEnA of landfill collected compression meter monitoring laboratory (EQA) gas landfill gas station with monthly collection of records CH4, CO2, Samples to Active Annual Landfill MEnA NH3, H2S be collected collection of laboratory (EQA) and VOCs from the samples and in ambient western laboratory air border of analysis the landfill Acidity and Monitoring Pumping out Annual Landfill MEnA hardness of wells samples laboratory (EQA) 425 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) groundwater Impacts Amount of Leachate Level Monthly JSCM MEnA of collected collection measurement (EQA) leachate and recycled pond of the leachate leachate pond and amounts records of pumping station COD, Leachate Representative Quarterly Landfill MEnA BOD, pH, collection grap sampling for COD, laboratory (EQA) TDS, total pond and laboratory BOD and N, total P, analysis pH and heavy annually for metals, TPH the rest of leachate COD, 3 Pumping from Quarterly Landfill MEnA BOD, pH, groundwater monitoring for COD, laboratory (EQA) TDS, total monitoring wells and BOD and N, total P, wells laboratory pH and heavy analysis annually for metals, TPH the rest of groundwater Amounts of Leachate Records of Once upon JSCM MEnA collected collection sludge pump de-sludging (EQA) sludge pond event Visual Green areas Landfill Visual Annual JSCM MEnA impacts planted over completed estimation of (EQA) the final cells the green cover cover % of the completed cells 426 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Table 9-16: Social management plan matrix during the construction phase Potential Proposed Project Institutional Responsibilit Means of Impact Mitigation Phase Responsibility y supervision Measures for of direct Implementatio supervision n Inconvenienc Full adherence Constructio Contractor PDSU Refer to e to local to the various n relevant communities environmental sections in the measures ESMP stated on the ESMP Establishing Pre- PDSU (SDO) PDSU MoMs community- Constructio WB, MDLF, CBMC reports based n UNDP monitoring committees (CBMC) Communicate Constructio CBMC PDSU (SDO) Reports and information n other with local documentation population s Enforcing a Constructio CBMC PDSU (SDO) Reports on clear n actions taken complaints to address system complaints Restricting Constructio Contractor PDSU Site construction n supervision works during certain hours in the day Full restriction Constructio Contractor PDSU Site from access to n supervision the site Impact on Short term mitigation measures the Scenario (A) The integration scenario livelihoods of A- 1 Pre- PDSU (SDO) in PDSU Implementatio the informal Transition Constructio coordination WB, UNDP, n of training waste pickers Assistance n with other MDLF Assessments of relevant training organizations Provision of cash and in kind assistance to PAPs A-2 Provision Operation Municipalities, PDSU (SDO) 427 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Potential Proposed Project Institutional Responsibilit Means of Impact Mitigation Phase Responsibility y supervision Measures for of direct Implementatio supervision n of Job JSCs and other opportunities relevant operators Scenario (B) The non-integration scenario B-1 Capacity Pre- DEEP, PDSU (SDO) Training development Constructio COOPI, reports programmes n MAAN, Beneficiaries in various UNICEF, evaluation areas outside NGOs SWM B-2 Facilitate Pre- UNDP NGOs Number of access to Constructio (DEEP), beneficiaries micro-grants n COOPI, from micro- and sources of MAAN, grants finance for UNICEF, Outcome of improving the project on livelihoods the family Long Term and Strategic Mitigation measures Assist Operation PDSU (SDO) in PDSU (SDO) Number of informal coordination bonds/networ sector groups with the Labour ks established in legalizing Authority and the conditions other relevant organizations Raising the Operation CBMC PDSU (SDO) Awareness profile of raising strategy waste External prepared and management Consultant implemented Impacts of Implementatio Pre- PLA in PDSU (SDO) Compensation loss of n of the Constructio cooperation documents privately prepared n with Rafah owned land ARAP Municipality Impacts on Monitoring of Constructio Contractor PDSU, Site cultural site n municipalities, supervision heritage excavations JSCs Immediate Constructio Contractor PDSU, Site information n municipalities, supervision sharing with JSCs concerned organizations in case of 428 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Potential Proposed Project Institutional Responsibilit Means of Impact Mitigation Phase Responsibility y supervision Measures for of direct Implementatio supervision n finding information, signs or incidental finds The Pre- Contractor PDSU, Site provisions and Constructio municipalities, supervision terms of the n JSCs Contract with the Contractor include a provision for dealing with this case. Table 9-17: Social management plan matrix during the operation phase Potential Proposed Project Institutional Responsibil Means of Impact Mitigation Phase Responsibility ity supervision Measures for of direct Implementatio supervision n Changes in Implementation of Pre- PLA in PDSU Compensatio land use the prepared ARAP Constructio cooperation (DSO) n documents n with Rafah Municipality Adherence to the Constructio Municipalities PDSU Site other mitigation n and and JSC supervision measures listed operation reports under various parts of the ESMP to ensure efficient site management Traffic - For El Fukhary Landfill Impact Implementation for Not finally This will be done as part of a separate project the project of identified 429 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Potential Proposed Project Institutional Responsibil Means of Impact Mitigation Phase Responsibility ity supervision Measures for of direct Implementatio supervision n Rehabilitating Salah El Dein Road 70 Restrict transport Operation Landfill PDSU Day to day trucks travel to the management supervision hours outside the rush hours. Strict monitoring to Operation Landfill PDSU Traffic the road accidents management in (SDO) Authority as part of the coordination records monitoring plan with the Traffic Authority Information Operation CBMC PDSU Reports and sharing with the (SDO) other communities and documentatio establishments ns located by the road. Conduct Operation CBMC PDSU Reports and monitoring survey (SDO) other to get the feedback documentatio of roads users and ns address any concerns - For the Transfer Stations Selecting Pre- Municipalities PDSU PDSU to appropriate model construction and JSCs participate in of waste transport (design) the selection vehicles of the collection vehicles Arrange the times Operation TSs PDSU Field of transporting management in observations waste to and from coordination Community the TS to avoid with the Traffic complaints traffic rush hours Authority Establishing Pre- PDSU (SDO) PDSU MoMs CBMC Constructio WB, UNDP CBMC n reports Conduct Operation CBMC PDSU Surveys monitoring survey (SDO) results This mitigation measure is relevant only to the southern section of the project since more stress on Salah El 70 Dein raod will result from the operation of Al Fukhary landfill and associuated TSs 430 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Potential Proposed Project Institutional Responsibil Means of Impact Mitigation Phase Responsibility ity supervision Measures for of direct Implementatio supervision n to get communities’ Actions to feedback and address address any communities concerns concerns Higher A) Short term measures cost to A-1 Municipalities Pre- Municipalities/J PDSU Follow up beneficiary and JSC to Constructio SC in (SDO) with the communiti maintain the n 71 coordination various es system of with various relevant particularly exempting/subsidiz relevant institutions the poor ing poor families institutions B) Strategic measures Design plans to Pre- External PDSU Consultancy stimulate further Constructio Consultant (SDO) reports economic n 72 New financial instruments for instruments SWM revenues communicate d and introduced C) Crosscutting measures C-1 Awareness Operation CBMC PDSU Awareness raising and building (SDO) raising local communities’ External strategy knowledge about Consultant prepared and issues related SWM implemented C-2 Raising the Operation CBMC PDSU Strategic plan profile of SWM (SDO) developed including External (consultancy strengthening the Consultant service) and recyclables market actions and encouraging enforced on community based various levels initiative in segregation at source Depressing Strict measures and Constructio Contractor PDSU, Site 71 Planning for this measure should start early before construction while the actual enforcement for the measure will be during project operation 72 Planning for this measure should start early before construction while the actual enforcement for the measure will be during project operation 431 Universal Group-Gaza ESIA for GSWMP Consolidated ESIA (Southern and Northern Parts) Potential Proposed Project Institutional Responsibil Means of Impact Mitigation Phase Responsibility ity supervision Measures for of direct Implementatio supervision n property best practices in n and municipalitie supervision values managing the sites operation s, JSCs Assist local Pre- PDSU (SDO) Head of MoMs communities in Constructio PDSU CBMC establishing n WB, UNDP reports community- based monitoring committees Community Constructio CBMC PDSU Surveys surveys and n and (SDO) results consultation to operation Actions to measure feedbacks address about the sites communities management concerns Potential Adherence to the Constructio Municipalities PDSU Site impact on other mitigation n and and JSC supervision the social measures listed operation reports and under various parts economic of the ESMP to activities ensure efficient site of the management neighborin Assist local Pre- PDSU (SDO) Head of MoMs g communities in Constructio PDSU CBMC communiti establishing n WB, UNDP reports es community- based monitoring committees Community Operation CBMC PDSU Surveys surveys and (SDO) results consultation to Actions to monitor the project address impact on social communities and economic concerns activities 432 Universal Group-Gaza