Document of The World Bank Report No: 56414 v1 RESTRUCTURING PAPER ON A PROPOSED PROJECT RESTRUCTURING OF SECOND NATIONAL FADAMA DEVELOPMENT CRITICAL ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT PROJECT GRANT April 11, 2006 TO THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA August 16, 2010 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS GIS Geographical Information Systems IP Implementation Progress M&E Monitoring and Evaluation PDO Project Development Objective SWS State Watershed Sub-Committee Regional Vice President: Obiageli Katryn Ezekwesili Country Director: Onno Ruhl Sector Manager / Director: Karen Mcconnell Brooks Task Team Leader: Africa Eshogba Olojoba 2 NIGERIA SECOND NATIONAL FADAMA DEVELOPMENT CRITICAL ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT PROJECT P073686 CONTENTS Page ANNEX 1: REALLOCATION OF PROCEEDS ........................................................... 8 3 4 ANNEX 1: Reallocation of Proceeds NIGERIA -- SECOND NATIONAL FADAMA DEVELOPMENT CRITICAL ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT PROJECT P073686 {TF056616} Restructuring Paper 1. Proceeds for Nigeria, Second National FADAMA DEVELOPMENT CRITICAL ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT PROJECT, [Grant No TF056616], P073686 will be reallocated as follow: Category of Expenditure Allocation % of Financing Current Revised Current Revised Current Revise Goods Goods 314,000 314,000 100% 100% Consultancy Consultancy 4,300,000 3,156,000 85% 85% Services Services Training and Training and 1,115,000 1,489,000 100% 100% Workshop Workshop Grant (Sub- Grant (Sub- 3,500,000 3,500,000 100% 100% projects) projects) Incremental Incremental 651,000 1,571,000 80% 80% Operating Operating Cost Cost Unallocated Unallocated 150,000 0 Total Total 10,030,000 10,030,000 Amount Amount 2. Overall progress toward the achievement of the project objective is satisfactory. The last Implementation Status Report rated both PDO and IP satisfactory. Various studies on Sustainable Land Management have been completed. There has also been an upgrading of GIS Software and purchase of GIS equipment. The quality assurance group review exercise of the Bank for the project was carried out during this reporting period. The reviewers compared the progress of work done by the project since inception with the expectation as contained in the grant agreement and all other project related documents. At the close of review, the reviewers recommended the following; (a) The need to empower the SWS members in the states to follow-up and provided add-on activities on sub-projects implementation and (b) The need to increase disbursement, and speedy completion of on-going ground water studies. The M&E manual is also being implemented. Disbursement 3. Disbursement is currently USD 7.2 million representing about 71.91 percent of the total grant amount. 4. The proposed reallocation is necessary based on a letter dated August 11, 2010, in which the Federal Government of Nigeria requested a reallocation of the funds. The relocation is to provide additional funds in the sum of USD of USD 374,000 and USD 920,000 to the Training/Workshop and Incremental Operating Cost Expenditure categories respectively to execute the identified critical activities that would ensure successful implementation and completion of the GEF programme. The low amounts in these categories are hampering the implementation of time sensitive activities in these categories. 5. The Mid Term Review (MTR) and subsequent supervision missions recommended that the State Watershed Committee (SWSs) be empowered to provide advisory services to the communities. This can only be captured in operating costs as the activities of the SWSs are funded under this category. Forest Management committees have been formed in the six intervention sites to implement the Forest Management Plans prepared by the project. The funding for the implementation of the forest management plans are also captured under operating cost, hence the increase in the reallocation compared to the appraisal estimate. 6