51658 BOTSWANA: COUNTRY FINANCING PARAMETERS Date: June 13,2008 The country financing parameters for Botswana set out below have been approved by the Regional Vice President, AFR, and are being posted on the Bank's internal website. I Item I Parameter Remarks/Explanation A. Cost Sharing. Limit on the While continuing to emphasize borrower commitment proportion of individual project and ownership of individual projects, the Bank would cost that the Bank may finance retain the option of financing up to 100% of project costs. However, specific arrangements would be determined for individual projects, taking into account project specific considerations. In practice, the Bank's financing share in many projects is expected to be less than 100% given government contribution and other donor participation. B. Recurrent Cost Financing. No country- No country-level limit on Bank financing of recurrent Any limits that would apply to the level limit costs is proposed. On a project by project basis, the overall amount of recurrent Bank may finance recurrent costs after careful expenditures that the Bank may consideration of the sustainability of project finance achievements; and implied future budgetary outlays, within the overall context of Botswana's aggregate fiscal position and prospects. C. Local Cost Financing. Are Yes The requirements for local cost financing are met. The the requirements for Bank Bank can finance local costs in any proportions required financing of local expenditures met, namely that: (i) financing requirements for the country's development programme would exceed the public sector's own resources (e.g., from taxation and other revenues) and expected domestic borrowing; and (ii) the financing of foreign expenditures alone would not enable the Bank to assist in the financing of - individual projects D. Taxes and Duties. Are there None The Bank may finance the costs of taxes and duties any taxes and duties that the Bank associated with project expenditures. No taxes and would not finance? duties have been identified as excessive, unreasonable or discriminatory. At the project level, the Bank would examine whether taxes and duties constitute an