RP260 v3 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................. i-iii Acronyms and Abbreviations.................................................................. iv 1. Introduction....................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key sections of the RAP........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Principle governing the CIUP planning ­minimizing of the resettlement 2 1.3 Overall extent of unavoidable resettlement and partial impacts on property... 4 2. Project setting .................................. ................................................... 5 2.1 Brief description of the CIUP ........................................................................................... 5 2.2 Maps showing the CIUP interventions ... ..........................................................................` 7 3. Community Participation and Establishment of Local Communities............................. 8 3.1 Selecting community representatives ............................................................................... 8 3.2 Mechanism for community consultations and participation ........................................... 8 4. on ­ Site Data Collection Inventory of Affected Households............................................ 10 4.1 Household survey and questionnaire ...................................................................... 10 4.3 Extent of resettlement in each of the CIUP sub- ward ...................................................... 14 5. Compensation for Lost Assets and Hardship Due to Demolition and Relocation 13 5.1 Group eligible for compensation..................................................................................... 14 5.2 Compensation categories......................................................................................................................... 15 5.3 Compensation packages ................................................................................................... 15 6. Asset Valuation process ....................................................................................................... 21 6.1 Procedure ........................................................................................................................... 22 6.2 Documentation, contract agreement and dossier ......................................................... 23 7. Proposed grievance redresses mechanisms....................................................................... 24 8. Institutional Arrangement for the RAP................................................. 24 8.1 Institutional actors.................................................................................... 24 9. Implementation Schedule........................................................................... 27 10. Monitoring of Proposed Resettlement Actions...................................................... 26 10.1 Application of verifiable indicator................................................................ 27 10.2 Determinations of the monitors and implementation of monitoring..........................27 11. Cost Estimates................................................................................................ 28-30 Annex: 1 Maps showing the affected properties15 sub-wards Annex 2 Survey questionnaire sample for PAPS Annex 3: questionnaire Annex 4: Social- Economic Baseline Survey status Annex 5: Tenants and Businesses Annex 6; Implementation schedule Annex 7: Organization structure Annex 8 Compensation Inventory for Ilala Kinondoni and Temeke municipality (not attached) Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ Executive Summary This Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) is an output from the Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program (CIUP). The RAP takes into account all resettlement and compensation aspects that originate from the upgrading activities in 15 unplanned settlements in the three municipalities of Dar es Salaam. The upgrading involves, among others, the construction of infrastructure such as access roads, drainage structures and public toilets. These construction works may necessarily result into demolition of some of the existing houses and other structures. Chapter 1 of this document describes the procedural approach to minimize unavoidable impacts resulting from demolition of houses and resettlement. It describes the result of technical solutions to realize the objectives, such as flexible ROW, and appropriate standards. Efforts to minimize impacts, combined with suggestions brought forward by the community at early stage in the planning of the CIUP in order to further reduce the number of affected HH. As a result of this consultative planning exercise the extent of resettlement in the 15 sub-ward is limited both in scope and scale. Out of total of 1,035 affected properties, only 25 will require resettlement of the affected households. The rest need minor adjustments. Chapter 2 gives an account on the project setting in the framework of the Local Government Support Program (LGSP), including an overview of the demographic situation in the 15 selected sub-wards. Chapter 3 outlines the procedures to ensure full and transparent information of the affected public and establishment of consultation mechanisms. Firstly the selection process of community representatives is described, which constitute important interface of all planning activities as well as a first hand address of affected persons presenting their concerns and aspiration with the forthcoming settlement upgrading investment. Secondly the roles of Technical Support Team (TST) and the Community Planning Team (CPT) are explained in view ensuring public and household meetings to facilitate the survey and awareness raising to Project Affected Persons (PAPs) all details regarding resettlement (if necessary), valuation, compensation payments, assistance and grievance solutions. Chapter 4 accounts for the household surveys and applied methodologies to obtain a full picture about the impacts on individual properties and residents, including businesses. Questionnaires were instrumental in forwarding a wide spectrum of options and responses Resettlement Action Plan I Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ that were taken into account in the RAP. In particular, the PAPs were offered several options in cases of resettlement. It has been fully explained that the Government will pay market value replacement costs for properties (land and. structures) to ensure that affected household can afford to buy a new residence or replace affected structures. Out of 46 affected businesses, belonging both to owners and tenants (Annex 2), the vast majority will be able to re-arrange/ construct new rooms to affected property. Therefore the temporally impact on local businesses will be limited. The chapter finally describes the extent of impact to properties being affected in each of the 15 sub-wards. Chapter 5 describes the steps taken in preparing the compensation plan. To begin with houses eligible for the compensation in cash or kind are determined ­i.e. affected households (owners and tenants) rather than individual. The chapter then defines the compensation packages as per impact. Each municipality provided annually updated (market ­ oriented) standard compensation rates for paying replacement costs for land, structures and other items (gardens and trees). Allowances for affected households are paid in cash and kind covering for accommodation, disturbance, transport, and loss of (temporary and permanent) profit from affected business. Vulnerable groups receive additional allowances and assistance and the RAP also recommends that "moving assistance" to be provided to tenants living in the 25 properties that are earmarked for full demolition in additional to compensation for disturbance and transport costs. Chapter 6. Explains the applied methods during the valuation process (May-October 2009) for valuing and entering into negotiations and agreements with the municipal valuation team. The process which through the PAPs were informed of their rights during the compensation determination process are described and the means by which the affected assets and eligible persons were documented, including the establishment of a dossier that will be entered into a query database established at the valuation section in each municipality are described. A monitoring database was established to facilitate monitoring of the resettlement action plan, and that will also be used to record information from the grievance redress system devised in the RAP, described in chapter 7. This section also gives an outline of the flow of information and responsibilities to address all complaints forwarded by the PAPs with respect to the planned investment project in a correct and timely fashion. Chapter 8 specifies the roles and responsibilities of the institutional actors relevant for this RAP, at municipal and others levels. Key Resettlement Action Plan II Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ responsibilities are attributed to the Municipal Council`s Planning and Coordination Department from which the CIUP Coordinator operates, while the Urban Planning and Environmental Committee of the Municipal Council scrutinizes and approves the RAP. The chapter also outlines the roles of the Ward executive officer and the Community Planning Team operating under the sub-ward chairman's. Chapter 9. Provides the implementation schedule and the time chart for all major activities and events that are determined in this RAP. Timely planning of certain activities such as valuation, compensation agreement and payment has been schedule to allow sufficient time for the project affected person to arrange for alternative housing or business premises, etc. before actual demolition starts. Chapter 10 dwells on proposed monitoring of the resettlement actions being the main responsibility of the head of the Planning and Coordination Department in each municipality. A set of simple verifiable indicators are recommended to monitor and evaluate the success or failure implementation of the resettlement planning. The verification method basically consists of household surveys. Community planning teams (CPT) are will also involved in conducting household surveys to assess the socio-economic situation of PAPs. Chapter 11 is the final part that provides cost estimates for compensation of the affected houses and private structures, and the costs associated with the relocation procedure and process. The estimates for compensation costs are based on the records provided by the household's valuers and surveys team. For all 15 subwards the cost for compensation of 1,035 projects affected household amount to Tsh 2,863,768,413. 00 A part from the detailed household inventory and agreed compensation prices during the valuation process (Annex 4) other detailed information is attached to this document, such as: Annex: 1 Maps showing the affected properties15 sub-wards Annex 2 Survey questionnaire sample for PAPS Annex 3: questionnaire Annex 4: Social- Economic Baseline Survey status Annex 5: Tenants and Businesses Annex 6; Implementation schedule Annex 7: Organization structure Annex 8 Compensation Inventory for Ilala, Kinondoni and Temeke municipalities (not attached) Resettlement Action Plan III Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ Acronyms and Abbreviations CBOs Community-Based 0rganizations CBP Capacity Building Program CDA Community Development Association (eg at Hanna Nassif Sub-Ward) CEMP Community Environmental Management Plan CIUP Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program CPT Community Planning Team CUP Community Upgrading Plan CWS City Water Services Ltd. EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EP Entitled Person ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework GRC Grievance Redress Committee GoT Government of Tanzania HH Household LA Land Acquisition LGSP Local Government Support Program MC Municipal Council MD Municipal Director MV Municipal Valuer NEMC National Environmental Management Council (1983) NGO Non-Governmental Organization OP Operational Policy (of WB) O&M Operation and Maintenance PAF Project-Affected Families PAP(s) Project-Affected Person(s) PMO-RALG Prime Minister Office ­ Regional Administration and Local Government PWC Price Waterhouse Cooper (Consultant) RA Resettlement Action RAP Resettlement Action Plan RE Resettlement Expert RoW Right of Way RPF Resettlement Policy Framework THB Tanzania Housing Bank TSH Tanzanian Shilling (= 1.060 TSH to 1 US $, as per Dec.03) TST Technical Support Team (for CIUP) UCLAS University College of Lands and Architectural Studies, Dar es Salaam V/MC Village/Mtaa Council WB World Bank WDC Ward Development Committee WEO Ward Executive Officer Resettlement Action Plan IV Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ 1.0 Introduction 1.1. Key Sections of the Resettlement Action Plan This document outlines a resettlement action plan (RAP) for phase II of the Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program. The resettlement policy framework (RPF) applied for the Local Government Support Program (LGSP) which provides general guidance for development of this RAP was disclosed for public discussion, in 2003. This Resettlement Action Plan includes the following key sections: - Description of the project setting; - Collection of technical information to identify the extent of unavoidable demolition of houses and the necessity for relocating affected families or business, either permanently or temporarily; - Description of the nature and extent of community consultation and participation, including the establishment of sub-ward committees; - On-site data collection by means of specific inventory of the affected households to obtain exact figures of project affected persons (PAPs); - Valuation of the losses of the project affected persons (PAPs) by category of impact; - Development of compensation packages offered for each type of impact. - Description of the valuation process and the compensation s given for each property affected itemized by asset; - Implementation of grievance resolution procedures; - Institutional arrangements for payment of compensation, allowance, assistance and monitoring - Implementation schedules - Resettlement monitoring - Total budget estimates for the RAP Prior to valuation exercise, field surveys were conducted to record existing features, dimensions and values of the affected properties. The results of the survey details out all particulars of people and affected assets. These records are stored together with the household questionnaires (see Annex 5.3) as dossier in the municipal planning and coordination department. The proposed resettlement actions and measures will ensure: - The provision of timely and fair compensation, with the ultimate goal that all project-affected persons would be compensated at least to restore their pre-project living standard levels; - Compensation will include loss of non-movable assets and structures (market value), disturbance, vulnerability, accommodation, transport and loss of profit(business) allowances, as applicable; Resettlement Action Plan 1 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ - Necessary assistance for relocation to all PAPs whose properties /homes will be totally demolished, prior to displacement, including assistance for the selection of new resettlement sites that have adequate facilities; 1.2 Principle governing the CIUP planning ­Minimization of Resettlement From the perspective of resettlement, the major principle adopted for the CIUP has been to minimize the extent of demolition of existing residential and commercial structures or affect on the structural integrity of individual properties. In this context it need to be noted that partial demolition will be permitted under the CIUP investment project in accordance with two provision made in legislative framework. In several cases of the land owner and the valuer have come to mutual understanding that partial demolition of house will be unacceptable, although it would structurally not affect the building's integrity. The procedures agreement is related particularly to cases where the families claimed that remaining property would hardly serve as adequate homestead or, in case of small business, as basis for sustaining the family livelihood. Consequently, such houses /structure would then be totally demolished and the corresponding registration and compensation packages would apply. For reasons of easing compensating for the hardship the RAP therefore has categorized any property as being totally demolished when at least 50% of all build-up structures building were to be removed. Engineer options and flexible design solutions On the engineering side the planning team adopted a more flexible approach. The principle of minimization resettlement was pursued by the following steps; i. To minimize the extent of involuntary resettlement specific technical options have been taken into consideration. Much of the upgrading activity will focus on footpath, roads and storm water drainage improvements, in order to reduce the number of potentially affected houses in certain cases the CIUP planners/engineers, in close consultation with the communities, opted to adopt levels of service that are technically and financially appropriate (basic and intermediate service level) ii. Rather than opting for rigid technical standards with respective ROW and more or less straight geometry of new roads the engineers designed meandering roods and drainage structure to accommodate existing structures as much as possible it reduces carriageways and right of way (ROW) to the minimum feasible width (to maintain unhindered traffic flow), and in some sections limited vehicular flow to one-way traffic; iii. Partial demolition of built structures has been taken into account. The potentially affected structure have been carefully surveyed by Resettlement Action Plan 2 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ the engineers to determine whether the affected building would remain structurally integral and safe from collapse after demolition of apart of structure. In case such examination gave doubtful or negative results, full demolition has been agreed. iv. Selection location of new waste collection structures in uninhabited spaces where surrounding impacts would be minimized, in contrast to other reflections that would rather place the waste collection systems in closer vicinity to where (domestic) waste is generated and people would have short distance only to deliver and store their garbage properly. v. In order warrant meaningful planning (e.g. to ensure safe emergency evacuation lines and trafficable road conditions) each single location as carefully screened against the above principle versus preparing for functional road and drainage network. vi. The planning and final design solutions (see maps in Annex 1) have been done in close cooperation with environmental team who assessed the EIA documented separately as the EMP for CIUP. Community involvement in minimization of resettlement The community actively participated in efforts to minimise resettlement, in the sub-ward meetings by the chairman residents raised numerous concerns that were duly taken into account by the CIUP planners. The result of this consultation was further reduction of potential project­induce impacts. For example, each potentially affected plot has been scrutinized in joint survey with Community representatives (Community Planning Teams) and PAPs for possible solutions (e.g. option of accommodating the re-arrangement /construction of new room or house). The technically expert gave applicable, advice on how such re ­ arrangement could be carried out without affecting the integrity and stability of the old structure. As a result, in most cases where only single or annexed rooms, part of rooms, latrines, verandas, kiosk and fences where considered to be demolished, solution that reduce the impact, to a short period where possible. In fact, in most cases if the owners would start building /rebuilding the affected structures by the time of receipt of compensation payment no temporary resettlement, loss business or hardship would be encountered. As outlined in the implementation schedule (section 9.1) there is a sufficient time between compensation payment and beginning of the upgrading construction activities to allow for all newly re- arrange/construct residential rooms or new business annexes (e.g. kiosks) to be ready for occupation before demolition starts,. This would result only in minor impacts on day-to-day life or income situation of the affected HH. Resettlement Action Plan 3 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ 1.3Overall extents of unavoidable resettlement and partial impacts on properties As a result of applying the principle of minimizing resettlement, the magnitude of expected impacts and hardship will be limited to a relatively small number of families. In total 1035 properties will be affected, of which (25 house fully resettled permanently demolished), 1010 houses owners will have partial demolition of their structures. For details, reference is made to Annex 1. (a map showing the affected areas) In the majority of cases CIUP will result only in partial demolition of properties, often a portion of a room or secondary structures like steps, verandas and outside storerooms. Overall, the CIUP interventions that will result in relocation caused by unavoidable full demolition and removal of 25 properties, as follows: Kinondoni Municipality 1 property Ilala Municipality 24 properties; As far s partial demolition is concerned, this will affect 1010 properties without necessitating the resettlement of people in Kinondoni Municipality 275 properties Ilala Municipality 341 properties Temeke Municipality 394 properties More information on specific impacts are provided in section 5.1 and in Annex 5.3-4 and Details of the survey records on the household structure, members , house conditions , household income situation and specific demands of the affected households will be monitored (commencing after the RAP appraisal) and dossiers prepared and filed at the municipal planning office) Resettlement Action Plan 4 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ 2.0 Project setting 2.1Brief description of the CIUP The Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program (CIUP) is part of the wider Local Government Support Program (LGSP), intending to enhance the delivery and management capabilities, productive efficiencies and financial sustainability of local government in Tanzania. The CIUP is improving community infrastructure in 31 selected areas in Dar es Salaam to appropriate functional standards, affordable and responsive to community demand. CIUP has been upgrading infrastructure and services for Roads and footpaths, Drainage, Sanitation, Solid waste and Streetlights. Upgrading of infrastructure and urban services has the implementation period of 7 years (2005-2012). The first phase of implementation started in year 2005, covers 16 unplanned areas, and benefits 167,000 people. For phase II, implementation started from 2009-2012. In each CIUP areas a community upgrading plan (CUP) has been prepared in a participatory, and demand responsive way. The basic demographic figures of the sub-wards that will participate in phase 2 of the CIUP are given in Table 1.1 `Phase 2 CIUP sub-wards'. The map overleaf shows the location of both the phase I and phase II CIUP areas. Table 1.1 CIUP Phase 2 Sub-Wards Municipality Ward Sub-wards Hectares Population Kinondoni Kigogo Kigogo Kati 34 11,896 Kigogo Mbuyuni 48 10,004 Kigogo Mkwajuni 58 14,333 Mwananyamala Kwa Kopa 27 7,546 Ilala Vingunguti Mtakuja 35 14,464 Miembeni 98 13,778 Kombo 46 20,234 Temeke Keko Keko Mwanga A 7 4,415 Keko Mwanga B 27 15,813 Magurumbasi A 18 7,104 Azimio Mtongani 22 9,146 Azimio Kaskazini 39 7,883 Azimio Kusini 43 8,212 Tambukareli 41 9,716 Kichangani 14 7,439 Source: CIUP data (2009) Resettlement Action Plan 5 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ Priority Sub- Wards in Phase and II CIUP Dar es Salaam City Priority Sub- Wards in Phase II and II -- CIUP -- Dar es Salaam City BAGAM BAGA BAGA MOY BAGA M OY BA GA BAGA BA BAGA BAGA OY GAMO O Legend Legend Legend Legend Legend Legend MOYO MOYO RA MOYO MOYO MOYORA YO RAOD Ward Boundary Ward Boundary Ward Boundary Ward Boundary Ward Boundary O RA O RA Ward Boundary RAOD RAOD RAOD RAOD OD OD OD OD Sub Ward Boundary Sub Ward Boundary Sub Ward Boundary Sub Ward Boundary Sub Ward Boundary Sub Ward Boundary Municipal Boundary Municipal Boundary Municipal Boundary Municipal Boundary Municipal Boundary Municipal Boundary Selected Settlements Selected Settlements Selected Settlements Selected Settlements Selected Settlements Selected Settlements (Phase ) (Phase (Phase III)) (Phase ) (Phase (Phase III)) 1. Manzese Uzuri 1. Manzese Uzuri 1. Manzese Uzuri 1. Manzese Uzuri 1. Manzese Uzuri 1. Manzese Uzuri 2. Kilimani 2. Kilimani 2. Kilimani 3. Midizini 3. Midizini 3. Midizini 3. Midizini 4. Mnazi mmoja 4. Mnazi mmoja 4. Mnazi mmoja 4. Mnazi mmoja 5. Muungano 5. Muungano 5. Muungano 5. Muungano 6. Mvuleni 6. Mvuleni 6. Mvuleni 6. Mvuleni 6. Mvuleni 6. Mvuleni 7. Mnyamani 7. Mnyamani 7. Mnyamani 7. Mnyamani 8. Malapa 8. Malapa 8. Malapa 8. Malapa 9. Madenge 9. Madenge 9. Madenge 9. Madenge 10. Mtambani 10. Mtambani 10. Mtambani 10. Mtambani 11. Chang`ombe A 11. Chang`ombe A 11. Chang`ombe A ND AN OCEAN IIN D IIA N O C E A N ND AN OCEAN IIIN D IIIA N O C E A N ND AN OCEAN 12. Chang`ombe B 12. Chang`ombe B 12. Chang`ombe B 12. Chang`ombe B 13. Toroli 13. Toroli 13. Toroli 13. Toroli 14. Sandali 14. Sandali 14. Sandali 14. Sandali AAOD ODD ODD A OD OD D D RRAO AAO RA O AO RA 15. Mpogo 15. Mpogo 15. Mpogo 15. Mpogo A RR ARR AAR 20 15. Mpogo 15. Mpogo MAA MMA MAA OOM OOM J OM OM M UJOO JO NNU J UJ J UJJ NUJ 16. Mwembeladu 16. Mwembeladu 16. Mwembeladu NUU NNU MNU AMMN MN SSAM AMM SAM AM SSA SSA SA SA 1 2 K II N O N D O N II K NONDON Selected Settlements Selected Settlements Selected Settlements MOROGO MOROGO MOROGO MOROGORO RAO MOROGORO MOROGORO RAO MOROGORORAO D MOROGORO RAOD MOROGORO RAOD RO RAOD RO RAOD RO RAOD Selected Settlements Selected Settlements Selected Settlements RAOD DD (Phase II ) (Phase II )) (Phase II )) ) 5 17. Kigogo Kati Kigogo Kati 17. Kigogo Kati 17. Kigogo Kati Kigogo Kati 17. Kigogo Kati 4 6 18. Kigogo Mbuyuni 18. Kigogo Mbuyuni 18. Kigogo Mbuyuni 18. Kigogo Mbuyuni 18. Kigogo Mbuyuni 18. Kigogo Mbuyuni 19. Kigogo Mkwajuni 19. Kigogo Mkwajuni 19. Kigogo Mkwajuni 19. Kigogo Mkwajuni 3 20. Kwa Kopa 20. Kwa Kopa 20. Kwa Kopa 20. Kwa Kopa 21. Mtakuja 21. Mtakuja 21. Mtakuja 21. Mtakuja 21. Mtakuja 21. Mtakuja 22. Miembeni 22. Miembeni 22. Miembeni 22. Miembeni 18 23. Kombo 23. Kombo 23. Kombo 19 Askari Monument Askari Monument Askari Monument Askari Monument 23. Kombo Askari Monument Askari Monument Askari Monument Askari Monument Askari Monument 24. Mtongani 24. Mtongani 24. Mtongani 24. Mtongani 25. Azimio Kaskazini 25. Azimio Kaskazini 25. Azimio Kaskazini 25. Azimio Kaskazini Clock Tower Clock Tower Clock Tower Clock Tower Clock Tower Clock Tower Clock Tower Clock Tower Clock Tower 17 26. Tambukareli 26. Tambukareli 26. Tambukareli 27. Kichangani 27. Kichangani 27. Kichangani 27. Kichangani 28. Azimio Kusini 28. Azimio Kusini 28. Azimio Kusini 28. Azimio Kusini 8 29. Keko Mwanga A 29. Keko Mwanga A 29. Keko Mwanga A II L A L A LALA 9 29 29. Keko Mwanga A 7 31 30. Keko Mwanga B 30. Keko Mwanga B 30. Keko Mwanga B 30. Keko Mwanga B 30. Keko Mwanga B 30. Keko Mwanga B 23 30 31. Magurumbasi A 31. Magurumbasi A 31. Magurumbasi A 21 11 13 10 12 22 14 TEMEKE TEMEKE Y AY AYY WAAY Y WAYY Y WA ILWA ILWAA ALLR RRAL RAL LR AILW AILW RAIL L RR AAILW AIL ILW A IL L RRA LRRA 16 RA L T RA NTTRA NTRA AA EENTR NT ENT CCENT CENT R EN CCEN CE CE CC DD OD AODD AOD AODD RAOD AO UGUUR UGU PUGU PPUGU PUG UG PPUG PU PPU URR O GURA GURRAAO U RRAO 15 25 24 28 27 26 AYY AY WAAY WY ILWAY Y IL WAY WA Y AILWAA AILW RAILW RRAIL W AIL RA RRAIL RAARRA R RA A R AIL RAA ARAA ARA TAZAAR TAZAR TAZA R TAZA TAZA TAZA TAZZ TAZ TA 0 1500 3000 Meters KILWA RAOD KILWA RAOD KILWA RAO KILWA RAOD KILWA RAOD KILWA RAO KILWA RAOD KILWA RAOD KILWA RAO D DD Source : Aerial photo, 1992 and Fieldwork, 2002 Resettlement Action Plan 6 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ 3.0Community participation and establishment of local communities Community participation in the CIUP was designed to ensure that an iterative process of consultation and feedback was undertaken from the beginning of program preparation through to the post-construction period. The RAP has paid special attention to community participation seen as most critical in planning and decision making, in addressing environmental and resettlement issues, and in devising responsibility for monitoring of outlined resettlement actions. 3 .1 Selection of Community Representatives The focus of the participation process has been on the sub-ward level, both with respect to the entire community and the group of representatives (Community Planning Team ­ CPT) established at the beginning of the project preparation period to guide the planning process. Community participation is regarded as crucial to the success of participatory planning, communication, monitoring and supervision and settling possible disputes within the community. With respect to the preparation of RAPs, the role of CPT or elected representatives is to; - -ensure the functioning of the public consultation process, - Assist Municipal Technical Support (TSTs) established to prepare and manage CIUP in arranging for community follow-up meetings; - Act as resource information persons for the surveyors of the PAPs and their affected properties; - discuss issues raised by affected persons and communicate them to the TSTs; - facilitate the assistance program (e.g. moving assistance, assistance to vulnerable group) - cooperate with NGOs and CBOs involved in development programs; - assist in initiating the process of grievance resolution; - Assist, as need, in the resettlement monitoring activities. 3.2 Mechanism of Community Consultation and Participation The following steps were taken to establish strong linkage between communities and municipalities for the purpose of community consultations and communication with regard to the CIUP and RAP in the formation of Technical Support Teams (TST) for each municipality, consisting of municipal government staff and experts of the consultants' team preparation of maps for each area is showing the foreseen investment structures and the individual properties that will become affected. Resettlement Action Plan 7 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ - Public meeting announced and organized in each CIUP area to elect community representatives for the CIUP preparation. The group of representatives would be named Community Planning Team (CPT) - Elections and actual formation of Community Planning Teams (CPT) for each CIUP area; - The CIUP areas subdivided in housing clusters (geographical zones) from where the residents would elect representatives. Previous experience revealed that it is practical to form clusters of about 30 to 40 houses. This created a balanced geographical representation. It and ensured equity and eliminate favoritism to particular areas. It is also facilitate direct communication between residents and representatives, because the clusters are small enough to ensure that people know each other. - Housing clusters defined in accordance with geographical features and existing street patterns and not by using existing ten-cell units system, which is more politically oriented. Gender equity achieved by election of one male and one female from each housing cluster. - Subsequent housing cluster meetings it's easy to organize in order to obtain feedback. Such meetings instrumental in disseminating information and receiving ideas and views on ways to priorities community needs and to test willingness of the community to pay for urban services delivery. - It was further decided that the sub-ward chairman and the sub-ward secretary participate in the process by virtue of their administrative position. The various communities opt to invite specific stakeholder representatives to participate in the process, such as NGOs and CBOs, the business community or religious institutions. Once agreement has been reached on how to select representatives from the community, the sub-sequent steps for planning were as follows: 1. Joint field visits (TST and CPT) for orientation, identification of priorities, identification of infrastructure deficiencies, proposed infrastructure interventions, identification of environmental issues and priorities and need for resettlement; 2. Plotting of the proposed interventions on the relevant map of the community area in order to give the CPT an idea of the extent of the impact and potential problems, such as demolitions; 3. Case by case discussion between engineers, TSTs and CPTs to find best solution to minimize structure demolition and resettlement and mitigate against negative environmental impacts; Resettlement Action Plan 8 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ 4. Guided by the technical experts (including environmental resettlement specialists) the CPTs, and TSTs assisted in costing analysis and finalization of the initial investment programs ; 5. Formal approval of the investment programs by the sub-ward committee and the ward development committee. With the expectation of step (iii) the entire planning include continual internal consultation between representatives and residents of the respective housing clusters to obtain feed back on proposed interventions, as well as addressing complaints, priorities and preference of the PAPs. In some instances, when crucial decisions had to be made the elected leaders (councillors, etc) were mobilised to participate in the process and to resolve initial disputes with PAPs. This facilitated not only the decision-making process but also demonstrated commitment and a sense of ownership on behalf of the elected leaders. The results of the planning process, including the respective detailed maps (Annex 2), are incorporated in the Community Upgrading Plans (CUPs) that have been prepared for each CIUP area. 4.0 On ­ site data collection ­inventory of the affected households 4.1 Household Survey and Questionnaires First, the TST code-marked all houses and structures along the new infrastructure upgrading access routes. The chairman assisted in identification of the house owners who then were notified and a date for surveying the plot was agreed. The owners of affected properties and their household members were surveyed and (see household questionnaire Annex 5.3) to identify their aspirations, priorities and concerns in connection with the anticipated partial or full demolition of structures. More detailed about the discussed resettlement and compensation options are presented below. During the survey and questionnaire administration the PAPs were made aware of the implications of impacts, their entitlements and registration requirements in the line with notification times. In line with the RFP, the cut-off date has been established and communicated to the PAPs by the date of the inventory of all affected property in the community. Resettlement options During the household surveys all heads of the projects ­affected households who face full or partial demolition of their home were asked to make statements concerning their choice for future residence. The majority of the interviewed PAPs indicated (in the questionnaires) their wish to `remain on plot' or left to re-arrange on the same plot'. According to the field surveyors Resettlement Action Plan 9 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ the connotation is that these projects ­affected persons, most of them facing only partial demolition of their house or part of a room would opt to re- arrange/construct the room or house within the same plot boundaries when space allows. The same holds true for business ­ such as those vending their goods on the street from kiosks attached on the roadside of the house. Compensation options: There has been no choice offered to the PAPs with respect to cash or kind compensation. The RAP follows the principle that all PAPs (owners) are treated equally with full cash compensation for land and structures at undepreciated market-price replacement costs. This compensation will be sufficient for the purchase of new house or alternatively a plot on which to construct a new home. 4.2 Results: Project Affected Persons by Category of Impact Table 2: Number of property owners and their resettlement options Type of Impact Number HH Opting for remaining on plot site and re-arrangement Home full affected 25 Re-arrangement Business full affected - Not applicable Home partial 980 Opting for remaining on plot affected site Business temporarily 46 Opting for remaining on plot affected site Tenant families in 165 Opting for remaining on plot partial affected site and re-arrangement properties Tenant families in full - Not applicable affected properties ­ rooms only * Detailed tables on the affected people, type, and impact is in annex 4.1-3 4.3 Extent of Resettlement in each of the CIUP Sub-wards The location of the properties affected by the CIUP interventions is indicated on the map for each sub-ward in annex 1.A brief summary of impact in each of the 15 sub-wards is provided below. Resettlement Action Plan 10 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ ILALA MUNICIPALTY-SUBWARD (1) Kombo By adapting the designs to the local conditions, improvement of roads and storm water drains will only affect 119 properties. The upgrading program in this sub-ward will result in the full demolition of 7 houses necessitating resettlement of the residents. The other, partially affected, property owners are willing and able to rebuild the demolished part of their house on the same plot. (2) Miembeni The upgrading program in this sub-ward will result in the full demolition of 14 houses necessitating resettlement of the residents. Other assets affected are several verandas that will be partially removed and amount to 91. (3) Mtakuja The only concern in this sub-ward is upgrading of some of the current footpaths into access roads, resulting in widening of the road reserve. The designs have been adapted in close consultation with the community to avoid demolition. However, two houses need to be pulled down completely which will require resettlement of the affected families. 101 other houses will be partially affected, involving the removal of fences, walls, gates and verandas. The upgrading program in this sub-ward will result in the full demolition of 3 houses necessitating resettlement of the residents These affected households have indicated to reconstruct the lost property within their plots. KINONDONI MUNICIPALITY-SUBWARDS (4) Kwa Kopa In this sub-ward infrastructure upgrading necessitates full demolition of one (1) house while 81 other properties are to be partially demolished due to the fact that parts of the houses (rooms, verandas, shop kiosks) protrude into the road reserves. The affected house owners have been interviewed. (5) Kigogo Kati In this sub-ward resettlement actions are equally minimal as only one house owner is unavoidably affected by the road rehabilitation works and will be resettled. 48 other houses will be partially affected (mainly verandas). None of the latter affected households would require resettlement. Resettlement Action Plan 11 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ (6) Kigogo Mbuyuni 72 properties will be affected with partial demolition (verandas, side- rooms and kiosks), but this would not require relocation of people. (7) Kigogo Mkwajuni 74 properties will be partially affected (removal of side-rooms, verandas, staircases). In some properties fruit trees need to be cut. TEMEKE MUNICIPALITY-SUBWARDS (8) Keko Mwanga A The planned upgrading works will affect 60 properties. Not one house needs to be demolished completely. The landowners opt for reconstruction of the part of their property that has to be demolished within their current plot. (9) Keko Mwanga B Improvement including provision of the storm water drains is expected to partially affect 25 properties only. No house needs to be totally removed. (10) Magurumbasi A Infrastructure upgrading is only going to result in partial demolition. 99 properties will be affected, including the removal of verandas, a few rooms and walls. Accordingly, there is no need for resettlement of Magurumbasi A residents. (11) Azimio Mtongani Infrastructure upgrading can be done without much demolition. 7 more properties will be partially affected, including the removal of one or two rooms, walls or verandas. Two mango trees will also be affected. (12 Azimo Kaskazini 27 other properties will be partially affected (removal of walls, rooms, verandas). The owners of these 27 houses have indicated to prefer reconstruction of the property lost within their original plots. (13) Azimio Tambukareli Most of the existing road lack side drains and the construction of such structures will affect the workshops, kiosks, verandas and rooms currently extending into the existing roadway. Consequently, 47 properties partially. The house owner concerned has opted to be resettled in one of the areas chosen for the purpose. All others have decided to reconstruct in their current plots. Resettlement Action Plan 12 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ (14) Azimio Kichangani The CIUP interventions in this sub-ward will not necessitate full demolition. 54 houses will only be partially affected: 2 rooms need to be removed, while the rest of the affected structures consist of verandas and walls/fences. (15) Azimio Kusini 32 other properties will be affected with partial demolition without necessitating resettlement. 5.0 Compensation for Lost Assets and Hardship due to Demolition and Relocation 5.1Groups eligible for compensation The groups eligible for specific compensation and assistance packages in the community infrastructure upgrading program are: - Affected houses and business (owners and tenants) suffering any direct loss, whether permanent or temporary, complete or partial, of assets or investment, land and property or access to natural resource as a result of the sub-project activities. - Vulnerable households-having special needs than other households. This category includes households and business that for various reasons are unable to find replacement housing, pack their personal belongings or business inventory, move their belongings or stock and unpack them in the new location Persons or agencies eligible for compensation for in advertent construction damage will hold the contractor liable. The CIUP does not impinge on the local community as no public and /or social and cultural common facilities will be affected. No community building, school, clinic or other public structure, nor any infrastructure such as telephone [poles and lines electric poles and lines, water mains, sewer mains and the like affected by this project. Compensation measures therefore do not apply. 5.2Compensation Categories Compensation for land, built-up structures, and business and relocation actions will be based on the following categories of the impacts: - Replacement cost of property: mainly residential and business structures vegetation: property owners (houses and business)are entitled to replacement costs for land and structural (unmovable ) asset at market values Resettlement Action Plan 13 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ - Compensation allowances for property owners: in cases where the impact on the property is (i) partial, i.e. will not require displacement and the affected property owner opts for re-arrange /construct new structures within the existent plot, provisions are made for compensation termed in Tanzania law as disturbance allowance. In cases where (ii) full relocation in unavoidable, additional accommodation and transport and transport allowances will be paid.(see section 4.1-3) - Assistance to vulnerable households: special assistance and allowance will be considered for this group, Vulnerable group are defined as a disabled or old people who leave alone and unable to find replacement housing, pack their belongings or business inventory. In case of CIUP areas there is no vulnerable person among the affected people. - Assistance for tenants: Tenants will receive assistance (see Also Annex 2 number of tenants affected) ­ to the extent they are impacted ­ when the affected property is used by tenants for residential or business purpose. All tenants will be assisted with moving and locating new housing or business and provided compensation for the immediate cost. I.e. assistance to pack up, to move the goods, to re-establish themselves in the new places etc.). Tenants will also be assisted in lodging claims against house owners that do not pass on the transport allowance allocated by the project to them. - Shops and business: the owners of the affected business temporarily affected by construction are eligible for compensation in cash for the temporally loss of profit resulting from the period of the move. As applicable, wages of salaried employees will be paid for the time the business is closed. (See annex 2 detailed of the business affected. - Graves: where the infrastructure upgrading requires the removal of a grave (including tombstone0 the relatives of the respective dead will be given the right to remove the remains of their dead relatives and bury them in a cemetery close to the actual location. The municipality is responsible to allocate such replacement plot. Standard Municipal rates apply to compensate for costs for relocation, including possible exhumation rites. 5.3Compensation Package This RAP follows the terminology of allowances as used in the Tanzanian Regulations Land Act 4of 1999. (Government Notice of 4/4/2001 the land assessment of the value of land compensation.) The compensation rates detailed below are mostly referring to table no. 5.1 which is list the standard compensation rates applied during the valuation process for replacement of affected structures, utilities, horticulture, trees, graves etc. (Replacement Resettlement Action Plan 14 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ value is defined as cost putting up an equivalent structures as the one existing at the time of valuation and making allowance for age, state repair and economic obsolescence in the place. Detailed on the case-wise application of the rates for each affected property are given in table no. 3. The rates are similar for all sub-wards within the Municipality. The actual value compensated has been the one determined during the final agreement between the valuer and the property owner. Table 3: Compensation Standards applied for affected properties in Kinondoni, Ilala and Temeke Municipalities S/N Replacement Item Unit Compensation Rate in TSh based in replacement cost. Ilala Kinondoni Temeke 1 Land undeveloped m2 20,000 20,000 20,000 2 a House - block construction, floors m2 200,000 200,000- 200,000 doors, windows, roof corrugated 300,000 iron sheets, high quality b House - block construction, floors m2 150,000 150,000 150,000 doors, windows, roof corrugated iron sheets, medium quality c House - block construction, floors m2 80,000-100,000 80,000- 80,000- doors, windows, roof corrugated 100,000 100,000 iron sheets, poor quality d House, constructed of mud & poles, m2 30.000 30.000 30.000 Iron sheet roof, no cement screed floor e Half built m2 80,000-120,000 20,000- 20,000- 80,000 80,000 f Foundation only m2 20,000-80,000 20,000- 20,000- 80,000 80,000 3 a Business premises ­ concrete block m2 200,000 200,000- 200,000 wall ­ high quality 300,000 b Business premises ­ concrete block m2 150,000 150,000 150,000 wall ­ medium quality c Business premises ­ concrete block m2 80,000-100,000 80,000- 80,000- wall ­ low quality 100,000 100,000 4 a Veranda ­ concrete block wall ­ m2 200,000 200,000- 40.000 high quality 300,000 b Veranda ­ concrete block wall ­ m2 150,000 150,000 150,000 medium quality c Veranda ­ concrete block wall ­ m2 80,000-100,000 80,000- 80,000- low quality 100,000 100,000 5 a Steps Tank and Latrine good quality m2 200,000 200,000 200,000 b Steps Tank and Latrine medium m2 150,000 150,000 150,000 quality b Steps Tank and Latrine poor quality m2 80,000-100,000 80,000- 80,000- 100,000 100,000 c Inspection chamber piece 6.000 6 a Fence, cement blocks m 130,000 ­ 150,000 130,000 ­ 130,000 ­ Resettlement Action Plan 15 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ 150,000 150,00 b Hedge m 8,000 325each nr 8.000 7 a Ashoka nr 7,500 7,500 7,500 b Coconut tree, nr 14,300 ­ 28,600 14,300- 14,300- 28,600 28,600 c Sugarcane nr 1,060 2,600 d Orange Nr 18,200 45,500 e Fruit trees ­papaya Nr 5,200 5,200 5,200 f Shades trees Nr 7,500 6,500 6,500 g Palm nr 15,600 15,600 15,600 5.3.1 Property Valuation For land (including non-agricultural vegetation) This type of compensation applies to all affected households, regardless of whether there is need for resettlement of the PAP opts to re-arrange their structure on the remaining plot. In accordance with 3 of the 2001 Regulation of Land Act 4 of 1999, the basis for assessment of the value of land affected by the project is the market value of the respective land measurements were in m2. The valuers specified the market value (including unexhausted improvement) by using the standard rates provided by the municipality for land valuation. (See table no 3) For Non Movable Built ­Up Structure The valuer determined the compensation for all private buildings and structures affected by the project. Case-by-case agreements during the valuation were in relationship to the material and quality of the structure. These valuations use annually updated standard compensation lists of the respective municipality. The same lists specify the compensation payment to the head of family whose grave will be affected by the project. 5.3.2 Allowances in Cash and Kind Accommodation Allowance: The accommodation allowance applies to all structures or portions of structures that are to be demolished, regardless of whether resettlement is required or not. The Tanzanian Law provides for an allowance which compensate s the property owners for the costs incurred in the period when construction of new structures is underway. In Tanzanian legislative terminology this defined as accommodation allowance, in accordance with §8 of the 2001 Regulation of Land Act 4 of 1999, accommodation allowances are calculated on the basis of monthly markets rents multiplied by 36 (months). Resettlement Action Plan 16 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ Disturbance Allowance: The Tanzania Law makes additional provision for all allowance which compensates project ­affected persons for impacts they experience during the process of demolition and, as applicable, of relocation. This type of compensation is meant to give support to the family to alleviate any social problems or physical hardship that they might experience. In Tanzania legislative terminology the compensation for the experienced suffering id defined as disturbance allowance. In accordance with section 20 of the 2001 Regulation of Land Act 4 of 1999 the disturbance allowance is calculated by multiplying the actual value of the land by the average percentage of interest offered by commercial banks on fixed deposits for 12 months. The Tanzanian legislation only considers property owners eligible for this type of compensation. However the Government of Tanzania has agreed to pay the affected tenants disturbance allowance. Since no fixed figure has been set, tenants in CIUP project should get 50% of the already calculated mount; the remaining being given to the respective property owner. The tenants affected in ach will share the 50% equally. Transport Moving Allowance: Transport Allowance (for House Owners) In accordance with § 11 the 2001 Regulations of Land Act of 1999 a transport allowance ids paid to all project ­effected persons whether partially or full affected. The payment is intended to meet transport cost incurred by property owners. It is specifically noted that the valuers applied this compensation to all properties, i.e. also to vast majority of those who will not be resettled. The legal provision determines that the transport costs are compensated at fixed rates equivalent to the actual costs for transporting 12,000 kg of luggage by road for a distance of 20 km all three municipal authorities established the applicable rate at the time of evaluation being TSh. 80,000 per household. The rate will also apply to the tenants affected. Moving Assistance (for Tenants): In order too ensure fair compensation of tenants (residences and business), the RAP will provide a supplementary payment ­moving assistance to tenants (including business) in (i) all priorities facing complete demolition and necessitating full resettlement; and (ii) partially demolished structures in which tenants will be relocated elsewhere within the plot. Verification of all tenants' households is proposed to ascertain the assistance package to all persons affected by project. Tenants in partially affected properties need only shift their belongings to the new structure within the plot. Tenants (household or business) will receive; Resettlement Action Plan 17 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ - Timely notification (3 months) (Rent Restriction Act of 1984) terminating the rental agreement as per Tanzania regulations. - Assistance to obtain any refund of advance rent payments - In accordance with their rental agreements - Assistance in finding a new rental until will be provided to any tenants in properties that will be fully demolished; - Assistance in moving form current to new room on the respective plot will be provided to tenants on properties that will only be partially affected. The new room will be built and the tenants moved before the old one is demolished. - Assistance in packing personal belongings or business inventory, transporting the same to new location, unpacking and re-arranging. The respective PAPs have been informed by the survey team about the assistance offered by the project during verification period. The person's eligible and requesting this assistance will be registered at the Ward Executive Office (WEO). Disputes and claims will be settled by the grievance addressing arrangements. The WEO will help to forward justified claims to the grievance settlement offices for resolving problems such as obtaining back pre-paid rental fees. The WEO will determine the cut-off day for effecting the payment and assistances. e) Vulnerability Allowance Although there no provisions in the Tanzania legislation for dealing with vulnerable group, PAP s who require special assistance (e.g. elderly, handicapped), in the line with the CIUP policy that no. PAPS suffer undue hardship because of project investments, will be provided. Full assistance to find and received a new residential plot Construction funds for a new residence that shall be in better condition than the one previously inhabited, approved the municipal authority The vulnerability allowance is calculated at 5% of the total value of the affected property to be calculated as lump sum allowance for a household that falls under the said category. The allowance is paid to the head of household. Loss of Profit In according to § 9 of the 2001 Regulations of Land Act 4 of 1999 the net monthly profit obtained from the business associated with the affected properties is assessed (for high incomes, evidenced by audited accounts where necessary and applicable, for low income approved by the authorities trade business list), and multiplied by 36 months in order to arrive at loss of Resettlement Action Plan 18 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ profit payable. This calculation applies also for such businesses that are only temporarily affected during the project's construction phase. This compensation payment will be made to all business regardless of the status (owner or tenant) of the user: as long as the respective business is affected by the project, the loss of profit shall be exclusively and directly paid to the person who loses his/her business premises. Compensation for Inadvertent Construction Damage Persons or agencies who suffer damage from inadvertent construction incident s are to be compensated by the respective constructor at market­ value plus replacement costs for the damage incurred. The CPT will assist in bringing claims forward to the municipality and/or the grievance resolution offices, as applicable. As precaution measure, the technical specifications in the contracts for the contractors for the upgrading investments contain clauses that deal with inadvertent damage. The clauses are detailed in the CEMP for CIUP. Table 4: Summary Matrix for Eligibility and Compensation Category of Impact Number of HH Compensation Package affected Loss of entire plot, built-up 25 Compensation at structures and garden determined replacement plants (residential and/or rates business) Accommodation allowance Disturbance allowance Transport allowance Partial of entire plot, built- 980 Compensation at up structures and garden determined replacement plants (residential and/or rates business Accommodation allowance Disturbance allowance Tenants in totally affected - Disturbance allowance properties Moving allowance Transport allowance Tenants residing in 165 Moving allowance partially affected Disturbance allowance properties Transport allowance Vulnerable households non Assistance to receive anew residential plot Vulnerability allowance Businesses, 46 Compensation for 46 vendors(operating in business premises that will permanent, semi- be demolished is included Resettlement Action Plan 19 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ permanent and in the loss of built up temporally structures such structures compensation. as kiosks, street shops, Disturbance and transport bars, charcoal ­sellers) allowance for those vendors not residing in the plot but using it for business Loss of profit , as applicable Daily transient vendors 100-150 At fixed public (easily movable premises (estimates as announcement date (within such as tables) number fluctuates) 1 month before construction starts) the CPT provides alternative locations to vendors to sell their wares or proffer services , no cash compensation Employed artisans (e.g. Estimated 50 (almost No specific compensation, carpenters, furniture's belonging all as in most cases makers) belonging to (carpenters) there is option carpenters) to shift open space workplace for short distances. 6.0 Asset Valuation Process 6.1 Procedure The valuation of affected assets eligible for compensation, as well as the identification and agreement on compensation allowances has been embedded in the following procedure scheme: (1) All potential resettlement issues have been analyzed based on first hand information i.e. from survey of the affected households. This survey allows identification of the magnitude and impact of resettlement. The survey and the answers retrieved form the questionnaires (Annex 5.3) substantially determined the planning for resettlement actions. The individual household questionnaire responses are also an important source of information in setting possible disputes at later stage. (2) The land survey team then made demarcations in line with the technical designs, and the structural assets subject to demolition were marked with code references along with the registered names of the property owner. (3) The ward executive officer contacted and notified (using Land Form No. 69, `noticed to Land Occupier to apply Compensation) in early May 2004 each individual land owner / occupier to agree upon a date for valuation and filled in Land Form No. 70 `Application for Compensation by Land Occupier). Resettlement Action Plan 20 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ (4) On the agreed date the appointed municipal valuers, accompanied by the municipal coordinator and members of planning team, valued the property by discussing each single item eligible for compensation, as well as calculating, in presence of the owner, the respective compensation values. The negotiations include the agreement of temporally loss of benefit for cases where business will become affected. During the valuation procedure the owner of the affected properties were full informed about the use of established (standardized) criteria for compensation of lost asset as well for the allowable compensation packages. The valuers took care that the procedure was explained manner comprehensible to the owner being affected. (5) After the negotiation agreement with the affected owner the municipal valuer drew up a contract that lists all property and land being surrendered and the type of compensation to be given. In kind compensation was also recorded in and order form, which were signed by the respective parties and witnessed. The compensation contract was read aloud in the presence of the affected party prior to signing. (6) The items eligible for compensation were documented in the owners' presence. Photographs were made of the signing party and of all major assets subject to compensation, and they are kept in Chief Valures files. Compensation will be included. (7) The owners were informed about their rights and the devised mechanisms to forward complaints, and notified that they must allow access to their property to the ward executive officer and the land officer of the respective municipalities for cross-checking their claims. (8) In addition, PAPs were informed that any of their complaints and claims prior to payment will be forwarded to the Municipal Director who is obliged to investigate the case. All claims need to be resolved before compensation payments are affected. Any complaints advance after a fixed date (within days of receipt of the final claim would be entertained). (9) In accordance with the laid down procedures and notified schedules (still to be determined by the MD), the local authority will pay the cheques to the entitled heads of households. (10) Thereafter, at a fixed and notified schedule, owners have the right to remove all assets and structures. Should the owner fail to comply with this action, the contractor will be given in writing the permit to unconditionally demolish and remove all structures as and when work progress would require. Note 1: The cut-off dates for eligibility for compensation under CIUP was not the asset inventory and valuation but the date of signing the agreement between valuer and the head of the PAPs. Resettlement Action Plan 21 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ 6.2 Documentation, Contract Agreement and Dossier Written record sand photograph documentation of holdings and asset is important to settle claims and to avoid later claims or fraudulence. Therefore, along with the signing the agreements forms, people and asset (infrastructure) were photographed for documentation. The detailed records of the valuation are kept in the Chief Valuer office in each municipality as dossier file. During the valuation process (June-December) all house owners worked with valuers and municipal CIUP Coordinators and CPTs to establish final compensation value of asset affected by the project. After discussion and agreement for the total compensation value the municipal valuer drew contract listing all property and land being surrendered and the type of compensation to be given. In kind compensation is also recorded in an order form, which was signed by respective parties and witnessed. The compensation contract was read aloud in the presence of the affected party prior to signing. For each valuation record a dossier will be prepared and entered into a municipal database which will have restricted access. The dossier will be prepared jointly by the municipal CIUP coordinators and the respective CIUP Resettlement Monitoring Officer (see section 6.1) each municipality office will maintain such database. The dossier will be entered in query database that will contain information on; Site location with property and valuation codes of effected property; Particulars of household members (both owners and tenants, as applicable Relocation place, applicable; Total holdings and specification / quantification of lost/ affected items Records of valuation and replacement compensation paid, Records of compensation packages agreed Record of compensation payment affected Description of new domicile (including land holding and built structures0 Photographic documentation (digital form) of the asset affected as per evaluation date Result of the first household survey (questionnaire records, see Annex 3) Claims and grievance forthcoming Claims and grievance resolved (including records for dispute resolution) Other information relevant for monitoring and verification purpose (see section 10.1) Resettlement Action Plan 22 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ 7. Proposed Grievance Redress Mechanisms At the time that the individual resettlement and compensation plans are approved and individual compensation contracts are signed, affected individuals were already been informed of the process for expressing dissatisfaction and seek to redress. Claims and complaints shall be brought to the attention of the sub-ward chairman who will forward all grievances concerning non-fulfilment of contracts, level of compensation or seizure of assets without compensation to the attention of the municipal director. If no agreement can be reached, the cases will be taken to the local court system. The basis for judging the claim will be the documentation provided in the municipality's individual dossier for this RAP. The grievance procedure will be simple, administered as far as possible at the local level to facilitate access, be flexible and open to any proofs. Care will be taken to recognize the fact that most people are illiterate and poor. It is advocated that all attempts would be made to settle grievances. Those seeking redress and wishing to state grievances would do so by notifying the municipal director. The latter will consult with the councilors, the ward/ mtaa and elders to determine the justification of the claims. If valid, the municipal director will notify the complainant to settle the matter. If the complainant's claim is rejected, then the matter can be brought before the local courts for settlement. If the local courts cannot settle the matter, it can go to the high court of Tanzania for resolution. The high court will be the highest appellate "judge" in this system. The decision of the high court would be final and all such decisions must be reached within a full growing season after the complaint is lodged. If a complaint pattern emerges, the municipal director with the TST and CPT will discuss possible remediation. The director will be required to give advice concerning the need for revisions to the procedures. Once the municipality and the community agree on necessary and appropriate changes a written description of the changed process will be made. The ward executive officer and sub-ward chairman will be responsible for communicating any changes to the local community. 8.0 Institutional Arrangements for the RAP 8.1nstitutional Actors The overall responsibility for the resettlement lies in the hands of the local authorities under local government administrative and financial management rules and manuals. In specific, the head, of the planning and coordination Resettlement Action Plan 23 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ department in each municipality will be the main responsible official to oversee and coordinate the RAP. Funding will be processed and affected through the Ministry of Administration and Local Government (PMO-RALG) through the decentralized local government and will comply with the financial arrangement agreed upon at project appraisal. The finance administrative committee of the MC maintains the overall budget responsibility for the resettlement costs and for compensation and claim payments effected by the municipality's finance department. This committee also oversees the collection of the resident's contribution for the CIUP. Compensation and resettlement activities envisage for the CIUP involve several institutions actors, including the community, individuals, local authorities and NGOs/CBOs, such as: The Consultant (SNC-Lavalin) in association with MMK prepared the technical design for survey is responsible of elaborating the RAP in close consultation with all institutional actors described in this section. The consultant prepares the survey of affected households, the community participation process, the cost estimates and the implementation schedules for all activities described in the RAP. Technical Support Team (TST): Responsible for the local surveys to design the urban infrastructure upgrading, maintains close linkage with the municipal planning and coordination department through the CIUP coordinator. CIUP Coordinators: He/she ensures the functioning of the community consultation and participation process, and timely launching of the project in community meetings other tasks include the overseeing of the selection of the community representatives and the establishment of the CPTs who will be, among other, engaged in moving assistance to PAPs. He/she also coordinates the set-up of a grievance resolution mechanism at the ward executive office, the resettlement monitoring and maintenance of the PAP record database. The Valuation Section of the Municipal Planning and Coordination Department provides annual lists for compensation standards. It determines the notification and registration of PAPs as well as cut-of date for compensation carries out the property valuation (through officers from the valuation section), while the Land Officer is responsible for signing the transfer contracts for land-take. The Ward Executive Office receives and makes all efforts to resolve community and PAP issues and complaints, forwards them to the MC in case no consensus can be reached in the grievance resolution mechanisms at ward level. Resettlement Action Plan 24 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ Implementation Schedule The resettlement action plan and compensation plan has been approved by the municipal governments. Timing of all resettlement activities, including land acquisition and demolition of houses etc. is linked with the schedule stars and [progress of the construction works. Acquisition of land and asset may be affected only after compensation has been paid and, where applicable, resettlement sites and relocation allowance have been provided to displaced persons. The implication is that before any construction activity is implemented, the PAPs entitled to compensation will need to notified and compensated in due to time in accordance with the RAP, all measure required to assist household with relocation must be completed prior to displacement. The same holds true for timely compensation for all business that are required to shift temporarily. The timing mechanism of these measures as outline in section 2 the implementation schedule is attached Annex: 3 10.0 Monitoring the Proposed Resettlement Actions The monitoring of the RAP is also the responsibility of the Head of the Planning and Coordination Department in each municipality. 10.1 Application of Verifiable Indicators As stipulated by the resettlement policy framework, a set of simple verifiable indicators was adopted to monitor and evaluate the implementation of resettlement and compensation plans as given in table below. Table 5. Matrix of Verifiable Indicators for Monitoring the RAP Verifiable Indicators to Monitor-Post Resettlement Situation Monitoring Evaluation Number /Percentage of PAPA HH who Acceptance or rejection of new decided to re-arrange their structure on resettlement area proposed by the the same plot after partly demolition government Number /Percentage of PAPA HH Preference of (successful) re-adjustment arranging successfully their new of residence after partly demolition re- homestead after re-arrangement in the structuring party affected plot. Number and reasons for failure of such re- Causes for failure, and lessons learned arrangement for future resettlement actions to be planned Percentage of moving assistance Effectiveness of assistance measures Number/Percentage of payment for Effectiveness of compensation allowance allowance Number/Percentage of payment for Effectiveness of transport allowance Resettlement Action Plan 25 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ transport allowance arrangement Number/Percentage of payment for loss Effectiveness of compensation of profit compensation arrangement for lost business profit Number/Percentage of additional Effectiveness of compensation and payment to vulnerable groups assistance to vulnerable groups Number of grievance appeals Overall performance of the RAP and lessons to be learned for future resettlement Number of successfully resolved appeals - Ability of (number ) individual - Ability of (number ) individuals and - families to re-establish their pre- displacement activities, by category of impact For displaced persons: Comparative Maintenance of better life standard after percentage of daily life costs (transport, resettlement ;living standard at least market, utilities, school, and medication) equal to pre-relocation situation increase in new resettlement area. Number/percentage of PAPs in working Income situation at least equal or better age who found adequate income after relocation opportunity in new resettlement area Pro-project production and income (year All affected individuals and/or before land used) versus present households compensated or resettled production and income of resettles and have at least marinated their previous affected persons (both for business and standard of living at final evaluation non business people) Number of impacted local residents Beneficial impacts generated by the employed by civil works contractors for project on resident's income CIUP opportunities 10.2 Determination of the Monitors and Implementation of Monitoring schemes Consistent with the environmental effectiveness monitoring procedures laid out in the CEMP, the resettlement monitoring would be carried out by analyzing household surveys in all resettled families that were registered during the process of notification and valuation. A query database will be maintained (see section 6.4) which contain all individual dossiers to keep track of the affected persons. This will ensure that also those families will continually be monitored who become resettled in other areas. The survey will be primarily assessing the actual socio-economic situation through a structured household interview and questionnaire. The above ­ described indicators will serve as analytic tools. Resettlement Action Plan 26 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ 11.0 Cost Estimates The monitoring activities shall start at the date of the appraisal of the RAP, and will continue 24 months. 11. Cost estimates to implement the RAP A summary of the resettlement plans cost 2,259,979,176.00 (in Tanzania Shilling) for compensation of properties affected and compensation packages payable to project-affected persons properties in each sub-ward is provided in table no 6. Resettlement Action Plan 27 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ TABLE 6:0 SUMMARY COST ESTIMATE FOR THE CIUP 2 RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN No CIUP Area Affected properties Total Replacement Compensatio Total loss Partial loss Total Value n (Resettle Compensation Allowances ment) Tsh Tsh a) KINONDONI 1 Kigogo Kati 48 48 119,451,140.00 19,752,557.00 139,203,697.00 2 Kigogo Mbuyuni 72 72 107,876,021.50 16,562,447.00 124,438,469.00 3 Kigogo 74 74 158,192,670.00 18,618,138.50 176,810,808.50 Mkwajuni 4 Kwa Kopa 1 81 82 252,183,110.00 75,669,797.00 327,852,907.50 Sub-total Kinondoni 1 275 276 637,702,941.50 130,602,939.00 768,305,882.00 b) ILALA 5 Mtakuja 3 106 109 248,057,400.00 77,613,060.00 325,670,460.00 6 Miembeni 14 112 126 399,502,100.00 147,891,660.00 547,393,760.00 7 Kombo 130 7 123 383,190,400.00 123,713,360.00 506,903,760.00 Sub-total Ilala 24 341 365 1,030,749,900.00 349,218,080.00 1,379,967,980.00 c) TEMEKE 8 Keko Mwanga 60 60 97,563,400.00 38,598,170.00 136,,161,570.00 A 9 Keko Mwanga 25 25 B 20,930,040.00 16,166,502.00 37,096,542.00 10 Magurumbasi A 99 99 172,586,720.00 32,069,336.00 204,656,056.00 11 Mtongani 7 7 19,583,300.00 2,819,165.00 22,402,465.00 12 Azimio Kaskazini 27 27 54,149,100.00 8,867,455.00 63,061,555.00 13 Azimio Kusini 32 32 62,217,800.00 4,662,890.00 66,880,690.00 14 Tambukareli 47 47 50,527,315.00 6,966,365.75 57,493,680.75 15 Kichangani 54 54 74,204,100.00 14,110,205.00 88,314,305.00 43 16 Keko Major 43 39,764,560.00 1,948,126.00 41,712,686.00 Drain Sub-total Temeke 394 394 591,526,335.00 126,208,214.75 717,734,550 Sum a) ­ c) 25 1,009 1,034 2,259,979,176.00 606,029,233.75 2,866,008,412.00 Contingencies 5% 143,300420.00 GRAND TOTAL FOR RESEETLEMENT ACTION PLAN Tsh 3,009,308,832.00 Resettlement Action Plan 28 Community Infrastructure Upgrading Program ___________________________________________________________________ The cost estimates for compensation of the affected houses and private structures are based on a complete inventory and subsequent valuation assessment for all properties that were either fully affected (25 of 1,035 =3%) or only partially 1010 of 1,035=97%). The compensation allowances are in line with the packages described in section 6 of this RAP. The presented figures reflect the actual agreement between the valuers and the affected person (usually the land owner). An additional 5% for other cost has been added, calculated from both the compensation payment and the allowances, to make adequate provision for other costs related to settlement considered in this RAP, namely moving assistance and assistance to vulnerable groups. This budget items includes also the operational costs for a grievance redress office. Resettlement Action Plan 29 RAP - CIUP Phase II ANNEXES CIUP Phase II M M K 32 RAP - CIUP Phase II ANNEX 1 ­ MAPS SHOWING AFFECTED PROPERTIES CIUP Phase II M M K 33 RAP - CIUP Phase II ANNEX 2 ­ BASELINE STATUS OF PROJECT AFFECTED FAMILIES SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE CIUP Phase II M M K 34 RAP - CIUP Phase II RESETTLEMENT HOUSEHOLD SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE [N.B: Where there is more than one household living in the house, the surveyor has to interview each of the house hold living in the house separately.] 1. LOCALITY AND IDENTIFICATION PARTICULARS Municipality................................. Name of Interviewer ............................................... Ward.......................................Subward.......................................Date......................... 2. HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS: Age Education and Employment 2.1 Demography and Education S/N NAME OF 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 FAMILY SEX FAMILY AGE EDUCATION MEMBER RELATION IN YRS LEVEL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coding 1.1 Sex of person= male or female 1.2 Family relation (1) Head of household husband (2) Wife or Husband in case wife is Head of HH (3) Son or daughter (4) Other relative (5) Visitor 1.3 Education Level (1) Did not attend school (2) Uncompleted elementary school (3) Completed elementary school (4) Uncompleted high school (5) Completed high school (6) Uncompleted higher technical/vocational school (7) Completed higher technical/vocation school (8) Uncompleted college education (9) Complete college 2.2 Occupation and Employment (15 to 64 yrs) in Each Household S/N OCCUPATION STATUS EMPLOYMENT PLACE OF CATEGORY BY EMPLOYMENT INDUSTRY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 CIUP Phase II M M K 35 RAP - CIUP Phase II 2.3 Applied to Head of Household (a) (i) How long have you stayed in the Project Area(sub-ward)? More than 10 yrs 5-10 yrs Less than 5 yrs (ii) Reasons for moving into this settlement? Employment opportunities Resettlement by the government Live close to relatives Other reasons: Specify..................... (iii) Plans for possible resettlement move to new areas in the Municipality readjust in the same settlement move to other areas outside the municipality? Specify.................................................................. 3. HOUSING CONDITION (i) Type of house: single : Detached : Semi detached : Arrow house : Apartment : Others (ii) Main Construction materials for Outer wall: Roof: Brick/concrete tile or concrete Galvanized galvanized Wood palm leaves Make shift make shift Others (specify) ................. ..................................... (iii) Ownership of dwelling Private owner/self owned Full rental Rented rooms House owned by relative or friend Government owned house (iv) Number of habitable rooms one, two, three, four, five, six+ (v) Space of dwelling unit and yard-estimated total................m2 (vi) Number of Habitable rooms House is for living only Living is combined with shop or other commercial business Living combined with workshop Living is combined with office Other (specify....................................................................) (vii) In case the house is used for business purpose (shop,workshop and /or office) is the business officially licensed? YES/NO 4. HOUSEHOLD ASSETS 4.1 Does your household posses one or more of the following assets? YES/NO (1) Radio/cassette/CD player ........... (2) TV ........... CIUP Phase II M M K 36 RAP - CIUP Phase II (3) Video/DVD-Player ............ (4) Fan ........... (5) Air conditioner ........... (6) Refrigerator ........... (7) Bicycle(s) ........... (8) Car ........... (9) Pickup ........... (10) Truck ........... 4.2 Does the Household posses other land or houses (other land than this plot)? YES / NO ha Estimated/Value in Tshs. (1) Other land for housing ........... ................................ (2) Farmland ........... ................................ (3) Other house(s) ........... ................................ Total value(1) to (3) ......... ........................... 4.3 Does the household posses cattle/animals? YES / NO Number Estimated value in TShs (1) Cattle ........... .................................... (2) Poultry ........... .................................... (3) Goats sheep ........... .................................... (4) Others ........... .................................... Total value (1) to (4) ........... .................................... 4.4 Is the house hold connected to power supply lives? YES/NO 5. HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURE 5.1 How much in cash did your household spend during last month on the following expenditure items or categories. In kind means food and other items produced by your own house or collected from relatives/friends SN ITEM PER PER PER PER WEEK MONTH WEEK MONTH 1 Food and drinks 2 Clothing 3 Transport 4 Education/school 5 House rent 6 House maintenance and repairs 7 Water supply 8 Electricity 9 Fuel for cooking 10 Garbage collection 11 Medical expenses 12 Recreation 13 Tax 14 Others 6. HOUSEHOLD INCOME What is approximately the total monthly household income from the following income sources for the last month? (Account for income of all contributing household wife others) Income sources: Total monthly Total monthly Cash income TShs. Value of income (Month) in Kind in Tshs(Month) (1) From main work/Job CIUP Phase II M M K 37 RAP - CIUP Phase II As employee ............................... ..................................... (2) From other jobs(s) ............................... ..................................... (3) From other jobs(s) ............................... ..................................... (4) Remittance from abroad............................... ..................................... 7. WATER SUPPLY INTO YOUR HOUSE 7.1 Sources S/N SOURCE OF WATER SUPPLY AS YOUR MAIN AS SOURCE IS THE FOR YOUR HOUSEHOLD SOURCE FOR FOR OTHER VOLUME OF DRINKING WATER USES WATER WATER ENOUGH 1 Piped water house connection 2 Piped water but connected through neighbour 3 Water from communal pump 4 Own dug well+electric pump 5 Deep tube well+electric pump 6 Vendors(on the street) 7 Others(water from stream) 7.2 Is your house-connection provided with a water meter?(in case you have piped water) ? YES/NO 7.3 Is the quality of water good enough? (i) for piped water YES............ NO............ (ii) for other sources like wells YES............ NO ............ (iii) Indicate the quantity of each relevant source of water that your house hold in using last month: see next table SN SOURCE OF WATER QUANTITY: HOW DISTANCE WHO IS USUALLY SUPPLY FOR YOUR HOUSE MANY BUCKETS FROM THE FETCHING THE HOLD (EACH 20 L) SOURCE WATER FROM THE PER DAY TO YOUR SOURCE HOUSE IN husband METRES wife son/daughter other relative hired person vendor 1 Piped water but connected through neighbour 2 Water from communal tap 3 Own dug well+hand pump 4 Deep tube well+electric pump 5 Vendors (on the street) 6 Others stream/river (iv) Is your house hold also buying bottled water from shops/factory? YES / NO If yes what are the reasons for buying bottled water? .................................... 8. If you are a house owner, do you have right of occupancy? YES / NO . 9. If you have a right of occupancy: What is your leasehold period ?........................... 10. If you have business: Has your business got a license? YES / NO CIUP Phase II M M K 38 RAP - CIUP Phase II What is your business: shop, kiosk or restaurant or genge ? ............................. 11. (as applicable)Your house/property is to be demolished for an infrastructure provision, what preference do you have among options for resettlement package? (i) Being compensated?............................ How much ........................... (ii) Get a new plot?..................... where in particular........................... (iii) Compensated but left to a new location site for himself/herself .......................... (iv) Compensated but left to readjust in the same pilot?.................................................. (v) Property location for business needs to be compensated?........................................... (vi) New location should be of similar characteristics e.g corner plot for business etc ..... ......................................................... 12. What are you going to miss if you are displaced far from your present area? (i) ............................................................................. (ii) ............................................................................. (iii) ............................................................................. (iv) ............................................................................. (v) ............................................................................. 13. What assistance would you like to shift to the new location? (i) ............................................................................. (ii) ............................................................................. (iii) ............................................................................. (iv) ............................................................................. (v) ............................................................................. 14. Preference time to shift ................................................................ CIUP Phase II M M K 39 RAP - CIUP Phase II ANNEX 5.2 ­ BASELINE STATUS OF PROJECT AFFECTED FAMILIES CIUP Phase II M M K 40 RAP - CIUP Phase II Project Affected Families Baseline Status - Sample Table will be compiled for each district ........................... MUNICIPALITY ..................................... WARD S/No Sub- Property Property No. of tenant Household Use of Live within Household Sex Age Relation to Education ward Code Owner households Head Premise premise size Head of HH level No. ........................... MUNICIPALITY ..................................... WARD S/No Sub- Property Property Tenant Period as Nos. of Payment Employment Place of Monthly Monthly Resettlement Assistance Time of Estimated ward Code Owner Household Tenant (yrs) rooms Contract Work Income Tshs Expenditure place within required to shifting Loss Tshs No. Head Tshs shift CIUP Phase II M M K 41 RAP - CIUP Phase II ANNEX 3 ­ SOCIO-ECONOMIC BASELINE SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE CIUP Phase II M M K 42 RAP - CIUP Phase II Interviewer Name ................ Municipality .................. Street............................. Date ................. Ward ........................ House Number................... Sub Ward..................... 1.1 Nrs of households............ GPS ­ Elevation............ N...................... E.......................... 1 HOUSEHOLD DETAILS : Name of Respondent ................................. Position in Family........................ (...........)1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Household Name of Head of Family................................... 1.2 numbers of people in the household .................. 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 Name of family member Sex (M/F) Age (yrs) Relationship Education 01................................. ............ ............ ............ ............ 02................................. ............ ............ ............ ............ 03................................. ............ ............ ............ ............ 04................................. ............ ............ ............ ............ 05................................. ............ ............ ............ ............ 06................................. ............ ............ ............ ............ 07................................. ............ ............ ............ ............ 08................................. ............ ............ ............ ............ 09................................. ............ ............ ............ ............ 10................................. ............ ............ ............ ............ (1)..Husband (1)....never attended (2)...Wife (2)....primary (3)..son or daughter (3)....secondary (4)...relative (4)....Veta (5)...visitor (5)...College (6)...University 2. OCCUPATION AND ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES : Adults Main 2.1.1 2.1.2 2.1.3 2.1.4 Name of persons working Status Type Location Distance 01................................. ............. ............ ............ ............ 02................................. ............ ............ ............ ............ 03................................. ............ ............ ............ ............ 04................................. ............ ............ ............ ............ 05................................. ............ ............ ............ ............ 06................................. ............ ............ ............ ............ Secondary 2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.2.4 Name of persons working Status Type Location Travel Time 01................................. ............. ............ ............ ............ 02................................. ............ ............ ............ ............ 03................................. ............ ............ ............ ............ 04................................. ............ ............ ............ ............ 05................................. ............ ............ ............ ............ 06................................. ............ ............ ............ ............ CIUP Phase II M M K 43 RAP - CIUP Phase II (1)...unemployed (1)..farming (1)..at home hours and minutes (2) ..permanent (2)...fishing (2)..in sub ward employment (3)...industry / (3)..in ward (3)...temporary workshop (4)..city centre employment (4)..shops/market (5)..other specify (4).. own (5)..offices business (6)..construction (5)..retired (7)..hotel / food (8)..transportation (9)...health (10)..other specify 3. MIGRATION 3.1 3.2 3.3 How many years you are residing Where did you come from Why did you move here ? in this sub-ward .................................. ........................................ ................................ (1)...another ward (1)..cheap housing (1) ...more than 20 years (2)..another district in Dar es Salaam (2)..land available (2).. between 10 ­ 20 years (3)..another town or city (3)..good infrastructure : roads, water, (3)..less than 10 years (4)..other specify electricity and drainage (4).. good social services : schools, health and markets (5)..others specify 3.4 Do you plan to move out..... ......................... (Yes / No) If yes continue below 3.4.1 Why ? 3.4.2 When ? 3.4.3 Where to ? ................................... .................................... .......................................... (1) expensive housing (1)..this year (1).. another ward .. name (2) poor infrastructure (2)..in five years (2)...another district... name (3) poor social services (3)..another town...name (4) for better employment / business (5) other specify 4. HOUSING CONDITIONS 4.1 House type 4.3 Main walls 4.5 Roof ................................. ............................ ................................. (1) single main house only (1) mud and wood / poles (1) Corrugated iron sheets (2) main house and out buildings (2) mud blocks (2) thatch (3) flat / apartment (3) cement blocks (3) tiles (4) row of houses (4) clay bricks (4) concrete slab (5) other specify (5) other specify (5) other specify 4.2 Value of the plot and building 4.4 Is wall plastered (Yes/No) ...................... ............................ (million TShs) 4.6.1 Ownership 4.7 Sizes 4.7.3 Plot size (m x m) 4.7.1 numbers of habitable rooms .................................... ................................ (1) self owned ....................... 4.7.4 Main Building size (m x m) (2) rented ..................... 4.7.2 If available (3) employer provided 4.7.5 Out building size (m x m) Kitchen........ (Yes/No) (4) relatives or friends .................................. Toilets......... (Yes/No) 4.8 Utilization ...................... 4.6.2 If self owned : legal papers Shower........ (Yes/No) CIUP Phase II M M K 44 RAP - CIUP Phase II ....................... Sitting room.......... (Yes/No) (1) residential (1) title deed (2) business (2) others specify (3) both 5. HOUSEHOLD ASSETS 5.1 Household Items Do you have (Yes / No) 5.1.1 Radio .................. 5.1.6 Bicycle............... 5.2 Livestock (yes/No) and Qty 5.1.2 TV ................... 5.1.7 Motor cycle............ 5.2.1 Livestock ............ 5.1.3 Fan......... 5.1.8 Motor car................. Numbers....................... 5.1.4 Air Conditioner............ 5.1.9 Pick up.............. 5.2.2 Poultry............. 5.1.5 Refrigerator................ 5.1.10 Truck............. Numbers ....................... 5.1.11 Cell phones ............. 5.3 Other properties 5.3.1 Other buildings ............. 5.3.3 Other farms ............(Yes /No) .......... (Yes/No) 5.3.4 Numbers ................. 5.3.2 How many............. 5.3.5 Total Area ........... acres 6. HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURE How much did you spend in the last month for the following ? Item TShs / month TShs / week 6.1 House rent 6.2 Food 6.3 Clothes 6.4 School fees 6.5 Electricity 6.6 Water supply 6.7 Medical Health expenses 6.8 Transport 6.9 Kerosene / Charcoal 6.10 Garbage collection 6.11 House maids 6.12 Security watchman / Sungu sungu 6.13 Cell phones 7. HOUSEHOLD SAVINGS Do you have any savings ? 7.1 How much has your family saved in the last year ...................... TShs 8. HOUSEHOLD INCOME tick where appropriate Amount / month TShs Main Employment / Business Secondary 8.1 1,000,000 and above 8.2 451,000 ­ 1,000,000/- 8.3 351,000 ­ 450,000/- 8.4 251,000 ­ 350,000/- 8.5 151,000 ­ 250,000/- 8.6 less than 150,000 specify amount 8.7 If assistance from other family members, state amount 9. SOCIAL SERVICES Availability (Yes / No) and Travel time (minutes) 9.1 Health 9.2 Education 9.3 Market / Shopping Hospital .......... Kindergarten .......... small .......... CIUP Phase II M M K 45 RAP - CIUP Phase II How far away ................ How far away ................ How far away ................ Dispensary ........... Primary School ........... medium ........... How far away ........... How far away ........... How far away ........... Health Centre........ Secondary School........ Main market........ How far away................... How far away................... How far away................... 10. ELECTRICITY 10.1 Do you have TANESCO connection .......................(Yes/No) If Yes ...................(Luku / Meter) 10.2 If No .......... why ? .................................... (1) No network (2) Have applied for connection (3) Cannot afford (4) Other specify 11. WATER SUPPLY SERVICES Availability, Satisfaction, Improvements and Affordability 11.1 Source of Water 11.2 Quality of Water 11.4 Reliability 11.1.1 What is your main source 11.2.1 Are you satisfied with the Is the water availability reliable ­ does of water ? ............... and quality of water .......... ....... it flow every day and all the time fetching distance (Yes/No) .................... (Yes / No) ................ (m) If No, what is the problem ? If No, what is the problem and fetching time ................................. .................. (1) Color (1) Flows only at night ...................(min / hrs). (2) Flows part of the day 11.1.2 What is your alternative (2) Dirty (3) Flows some days in a week source of water if first not (3) smells available ........ (4) other specify and fetching distance 11.2.2 Do boil water ............ 11.5 Fetching distance and (Yes/No) fetching time ................ (m) 11.2.3 Do you buy bottled water for How far is the water source ? and fetching time drinking ............. (Yes/No) .............................. ...................(min / hrs). (1) At home 11.3 Adequacy - is the water (2) 100m or 10 minutes (1) DAWASCO house connection available sufficient .............. (3) 250m or 25 mins (2) DAWASCO neighbour (4) 400m or 40 minutes (Yes/No) (3) DAWASCO kiosk and standpipe (5) more than 400m or more than 1 hour (4) Wells If No, what is the problem ? (5) Vendors .................................... (1) Little flow (2) no pressure (3) too many people ­ long queue (4) other specify 11.6 Payment for Water 11.7 Improvements 11.8 Level of Service Improvements How much do you pay for water What improvements do you suggest 11.8.1 What level of service can you .......................... for water supply services ? in afford ? (1) monthly flat rate state amount sequence of priority ......................................... (2) at the water kiosk per bucket state .................................... (1) Multiple taps house connection with amount monthly charges 40,000/- (1) piped water supply form DAWASCO (3) from neighbour state amount (2) Single Yard tap house connection with (2) bring piped water supply closer to the (4) from wells per bucket state amount house monthly charges 20,000/- (5) no payment - free (3) increase pipe flow and pressure (3) Water kiosk collection with water charges per bucket 20/- (4) improve quality (5) no improvement necessary 12. ACCESS ROADS present situation and desired improvements 12.1 What is your common mode of transport to work ................... (1) foot (2) bicycle (3) bus (4) motor cycle (5) car personal or employers 12.2 Present Situation 12.2.2 Can an Ambulance or a 12.2.4 How wide is the access road CIUP Phase II M M K 46 RAP - CIUP Phase II 12.2.1 How far is the nearest bus vehicle reach your house ? to your house ?.............................. stop ? ....................... .......................... (Yes / No) (1) no access road or path at all (1) 100m or 5 minutes (2) access path for bicycle 1 ­ 2m wide 12.2.3 How far from your house (2) 500m or 10 minutes can a vehicle reach ? (3) access road path 2 ­ 5m wide (3) 1 km or 20 minutes (4) access road > 5m wide (1) 100m or 5 minutes (4) 2km or 40 minutes (2) 500m or 10 minutes (5) 4km or 60 minutes (3) 1 km or 20 minutes (4) 2km or 40 minutes (5) 4km or 60 minutes 12.3 Improvements 12.3.3 Are you willing to provide 12.3.4 How wide would like your 12.3.1 How nearest would you part of your land (upto 25%) for access road to be ? ................... want the access road ? access road way leaf knowing that (1) access road path 3 ­ 5m wide ­ single lane your property value will increase (2) access road 5 ­ 8 m wide ­ two way ...................................... because of the new road ? narrow (1) 100m or 5 minutes (1) Yes with government compensation rate (3) access road 10m wide ­ two way wide (2) 500m or 10 minutes (2) Yes as my contribution towards the (4) no improvement (3) 1 km or 20 minutes project (4) no improvement (3) Not at all 12.3.5 If you have to contribute towards the costs, do you want the 12.3.2 How nearest would you road to be ? ........................ want the bust stop to be ? (1) gravel road cheap but poor condition ............................ (2) single seal bitumen medium cost (1) 100m or 5 minutes (3) premix good tarmac but high cost (2) 500m or 10 minutes (3) 1 km or 20 minutes (4) No improvements 13. STORMWATER DRAINAGE Present situation and improvements desired 13.1 Present Situation 13.1.3 Does any damage occur 13.2 Improvements 13.1.1 Do you experience during flooding 13.2.1 Do you recommend that flooding during the rains ............................. drainage system should extended ? ................................. (1) Yes to my building ........................................ (1) Every rainfall (2) Yes to other buildings as well (1) Yes (2) No (2) Some rainfall (3) Yes to access roads (3) No flooding (4) Yes erosion 13.2.2 Will you contribute towards the (5) No damage cost of construction ? 13.1.2 Does the flooding / [Fill as many] ......................... ponding last for along period (1) Yes (2) No ................................. (1) For many days 13.2.3 Will you assist in cleaning the (2) For one day drainage system ? (3) For few hours ......................... (4) No flooding (1) Yes (2) No 14. SANITATION ­ WASTEWATER DISPOSAL Present Situation and Improvements 14.1 Present Situation 14.1.3 What do you have for sullage 14.2 Improvements 14.1.1 What do you have for ? ......................... 14.2.1 [For those with Pit Latrines] For toilet wastewater? (1) Inside the house wash basin, shower improved water supply, you may be and kitchen sink required to build a septic tank and .................................. (2) Outside the house shower and Karo soak pits. Will you be willing to do so (1) Inside the house Flush toilet (3) Others specify ? (2) Outside the house Flush Toilet CIUP Phase II M M K 47 RAP - CIUP Phase II (3) Pit Latrine 14.1.4 How do you dispose your ......................... (4) Nothing sullage wastewater ? (1) Yes (2) No (5) Others specify .................................. (1) In stormwater ditches 14.2.2 [For those with Pit Latrines] 14.1.2 How do you dispose your (2) On open ground Would you like to build a Ventilated Pit toilet wastewater ? (3) Pit Latrine Latrine ? .............................. .................................. (4) Soak pit only (1) Yes (2) No (1) In stormwater ditches (5) Septic Tank with Soak Pit (2) Pit Latrine (6) Others Specify 14.2.3 [For overflowing system] How (3) Soak pit only do you plan to solve this problem ? (4) Septic Tank with Soak Pit 14.1.5 How does your pit latrine or ................................ (5) Others Specify septic tank/soakpits function ? (1) Get cesspit emptiers ....................... (2) Build another system (1) They overflow (3) Others Specify (2) They smell badly (3) They encourage rodents, flies and mosquitoes (4) They function well 15. GARBAGE COLLECTION Present Situation and Improvements 15.1 Present Situation [For those with Municipal / Private 15.2 Improvements 15.1.1 How do dispose your Collection] [For those without Collection System] garbage ? .................. 15.1.2 If Municipal or Private 15.2.1 Would you like to avail (1) Municipal Collection ­ Transfer Collection, How often it is collected Municipal Collection system and pay Station in one week ? ................. Specify for the services ? ................. (2) Private Collection (1) Yes (2) No (3) Store in a pit / drum and burn 15.1.3 How much do you pay for 15.2.2 How much are you willing to (4) Store on open ground and burn collection every pay for the services every month ? (5) Dump on open ground in the plot and months.................. specify Tshs do nothing ......................... specify TShs (6) Dump on other informal areas ­ ditches and streams or other unused 15.1.4 How far is the transfer station [For those with Collection System] land ? 15.2.3 What improvements do you ........................... specify wish ? .......................... minutes of walking ........................................... specify as many (1) Increase frequency of collection and am willing to pay more (2) Bring transfer stations closer and am willing to pay more (3) Others Specify (4) No improvements necessary 16. STREET LIGHTING Present Situation and Improvements 16.1 Present Situation 16.2 Improvements 16.2.3 Where do you recommend that 16.1.1 Have you ever been 16.2.1 Do you believe with street street lights should be installed ? attacked or robbed at night ? lights will reduce the attacks and .......................... ............................... hurting oneself ? ........................ (1) Yes How many times ........... ............................. ........................ (2) No (1) Yes (2) No ...................... specify locations 16.1.2 Have you ever been hurt 16.2.2 If Yes do you agree to while walking or traveling contribute towards the cost of street CIUP Phase II M M K 48 RAP - CIUP Phase II because of darkness ? lights ? .......................... ............................... (1) Yes (2) No (1) Yes How many times ........... (2) No 17. IMPROVEMENTS AND SEQUENCE OF PRIORITY 17.1 Please indicate Yes / No if 17.2 Please indicate Yes / No if you 17.3 Specify Priority improvements are necessary in will contribute towards these 1st (most needed) ........................ your area ? improvements ? 2nd (necessary) ........................ (1) Water Supply ................ (1) Water Supply ................ 3rd (useful) ....................... (2) Flood protection ........... (2) Flood protection ........... (3) Access Roads................ (3) Access Roads................ 4) Street Lighting ............... (4) Street Lighting ............... (5) Garbage Collection ...... (5) Garbage Collection ......... (6) Sanitation .................. (6) Sanitation .................. (7) Environment ............... (7) Environment ............... (8) Market....................... (8) Market....................... (9) Schools ..................... (9) Schools ..................... (10) Health ..................... (10) Health ..................... (11) Other Specify (11) Other Specify ...................................... ..................................... CIUP Phase II M M K 49 RAP - CIUP Phase II ANNEX 4 ­ SAMPLE BASELINE SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS IN SUB-WARDS CIUP Phase II M M K 50 RAP - CIUP Phase II Mtakuja Sub-Ward ­ Vingunguti Ward ­ Ilala District Item Parameter 1. Population - Family size 3.89 person/HH - Gender - Male: 48.3% - Female: 51.7% - Age structure - Under 18: 39.6% - From 18 to 60: 58.1%% - Over 60: 3.1% 2. Education - Nil: 21.3% - Primary: 66.1% - Secondary School: 11.5% - College, University: 1.1% 3. Employment - Permanent: 16.4% - Self Employed: 44.1% - Unemployed: 5.1% - Retired : 0.5% - Housewife : 27.7% - Temporary Employment : 6.2% 4. Household income - Low income under 150,000 TShs/HH/ month: 57% - From 151,000 ­ 250,000 TShs/HH/month : 15% - From 251,000 ­ 350,000 TShs/HH/month : 5% - From 351,000 - 450.000 TShs/HH/ month: 1% - From 451,000 ­ 1,000,000 TShs/HH/ month : 1% - Over 1,0500,000 TShs/HH/month: 0.% 5. Expenses - Food and drink: 46.7% - Transportation: 6.6% - Electricity: 1.4% - House rent: 3.5% - Water supply, drainage: 3.9% - Clothes : 8.2% - Solid waste: 0.9% - School fees 5.6% - Health : 3.3% - Cell phone : 5.9% - Kerosene / charcoal : 13.8% 6. Basic infrastructure Housing: - Average plot size : 248sqm - Average house size : 172sqm (including out houses) - Occupancy : 2.27 HH/House - Per Capita House Size : 19.48 m2/person Type of house: - Mud and other : 0% CGI Roof : 98% - Mud Blocks : 1% Concrete Roof Slab : 0% - Cement Blocks : 99% Other Roof : 2% o Plastered Wall : 51% Housing ownership: - Private: 29% With Ownership legal papers : 21% o Rent from private owner: 69% House Use : - Business Only : 6% - Residential Only : 77% - Combined : 8% Other House Features - With Kitchen : 26% - With W.C : 88% o With Shower : 64% Transportation Mode : Walk - 9% Cycle ­ 1% Bus ­ 70% motorcycle ­ 1% cars ­ 0% Access width : Nil ­ 9% 1 to 2m ­ 31% 2 to 5m ­ 46% > 5m ­ 10% Vehicle Access : up to house ­ 59% 100m / 5 mins ­ 55% 500m / 10 mins ­ 4% > 1km 10% To Bus Stop : 100m / 5 min ­ 67% 500m / 10 mins ­ 24% > 1km 6% CIUP Phase II M M K 51 RAP - CIUP Phase II Access to Social services - Health : Hospital ­ 62% Dispensary ­ 54% Clinic - 53% - School : Nursery ­ 100% Primary ­ 100% Secondary ­ 11% - Markets : Main ­ 11% Small ­ 66% Mid ­ 77% Diseases - Malaria ­ 55% Cholera ­ 1% Dysentry ­ 0% Diahorrea ­ 2% - HIV / AIDS ­ 1% Bronchitis ­ 0% Worms ­ 0% Skin ­ 0% - STD ­ 0% Eyes ­ 0% Domestic power: - Connecting to domestic power system by formal contract: 38% - With LUKU prepaid ­ 13% Water supply service and - Hse connection : 1% Satisfaction : satisfaction : - From neighbour : 22% - Quality : 35% Boiling : 52% - Vendors purchase : 31% - Reliability : 41% - Wells : 81% - Adequate : 46% Water supply costs and Costs Fetching Distance / time : fetching distance - monthly : TShs 525/ HH Nil / hse connection : 4% - per bucket from kiosks: 36TShs 100m / 10 mins : 40% - per bucket from wells : 33TShs 250m / 25 mins : 29% - per bucket Vendors : - TShs 400m / 40 mins : 4% o Consumption daily : 5.7 buckets > 400m / > 1 hr :01% Stormwater Drainage Flooding during rainfall : Always ­ 24% Occasionally ­ 14% never ­ 38% Flooding period : Many days ­ 20% one day ­ 15% few hours ­ 29% nil ­ 35% Damage to properties : my house ­ 14% others houses ­ 18% road damage ­ 50% erosion ­ 7% no damage ­ 39% Sanitation : Facilities : Discharge wastewater : - Internal WC with Septic tank : 3% storm ditches - 6% - External WC with Septic tank : 7% pit latrine ­ 75% - Pit Latrine : 88% septic tank / soakpit ­ 17% - Neighbours and others : 2% Sullage (grey water) : Wash clothes : Satisfaction of system : - inside the house ­ 1% full / overflow ­ 6% - outside ­ 53% smell ­ 0% Sulage discharge : rodents ­ 10% - storm ditches ­ 3% satisfactory ­ 78% - on open ground ­ 80% - pit latrine ­ 3% - septic tank ­ 8% Solid Waste Collection : Service : Collection frequency : 1 times / 2week - municipal stations - 12% Cost for waste collection : Tshs 904/ month - private service providers ­ 75% Distance to station : 1 minutes - burn at the plot ­ 4% - dispose open grounds ­ 3% - dispose in storm ditches ­ 3% Street Lights : Crime last year: Believe crime due to no street lights ­ 94% - experienced - 15% - injured during robbery ­ 16% CIUP Phase II M M K 52 RAP - CIUP Phase II Kigogo Kati Sub-Ward ­ Kigogo Ward ­ Kinondoni District Item Parameter 1. Population - Family size 4.23 person/HH - Gender - Male: 49.4% - Female: 50.6% - Age structure - Under 18: 35.2% - From 18 to 60: 61.7%% - Over 60: 3.1% 2. Education - Nil: 15.8% - Primary: 65.5% - Secondary School: 18% - College, University: 0.7% 3. Employment - Permanent: 13.0% - Self Employed: 26.1% - Unemployed: 34.4% - Retired : 1.7% - Housewife : 17.1% - Temporary Employment : 7.7% 4. Household income - Low income under 150,000 TShs/HH/ month: 52% - From 151,000 ­ 250,000 TShs/HH/month : 19% - From 251,000 ­ 350,000 TShs/HH/month : 8% - From 351,000 - 450.000 TShs/HH/ month: 3% - From 451,000 ­ 1,000,000 TShs/HH/ month : 2% - Over 1,0500,000 TShs/HH/month: 2.% 5. Expenses - Food and drink: 39.94% - Transportation: 7.10% - Electricity: 2.19% - House rent: 3.22% - Water supply, drainage: 6% - Clothes : 9.64% - Solid waste: 0.24% - School fees 5.12% - Health : 6.39% - Cell phone : 7.07% - Kerosene / charcoal : 13% 6. Basic infrastructure Housing: - Average plot size : 375sqm - Average house size : 63sqm (including out houses) - Occupancy : 2.01 HH/House - Per Capita House Size : 7.41 m2/person Type of house: - Mud and other : 4% CGI Roof : 97% - Mud Blocks : 2% Concrete Roof Slab : 0% - Cement Blocks : 94% Other Roof : 3% - Plastered Wall : 71% Housing ownership: - Private: 41% With Ownership legal papers : 34% - Rent from private owner: 56% House Use : - Business Only : 4% - Residential Only : 72% - Combined : 12% Other House Features - With Kitchen : 37% - With W.C : 89% - With Shower : 74% Transportation Mode : Walk - 5% Cycle ­ 3% Bus ­ 77% motorcycle ­ 1% cars ­ 1% Access width : Nil ­ 21% 1 to 2m ­ 24% 2 to 5m ­ 32% > 5m ­ 10% Vehicle Access : up to house ­ 39% 100m / 5 mins ­ 49% 500m / 10 mins ­ 16% > 1km 15% To Bus Stop : 100m / 5 min ­ 65% 500m / 10 mins ­ 20% > 1km 14% Access to Social services - Health : Hospital ­ 72% Dispensary ­ 47% Clinic - 84% - School : Nursery ­ 87% Primary ­ 96% Secondary ­ 11% - Markets : Main ­ 21% Small ­ 58% Mid ­ 27% CIUP Phase II M M K 53 RAP - CIUP Phase II Diseases - Malaria ­ 76% Cholera ­ 9% Dysentry ­ 4% Diahorrea ­ 9% - HIV / AIDS ­ 5% Bronchitis ­ 4% Worms ­ 10% Skin ­ 7% - STD ­ 2% Eyes ­ 9% Domestic power: - Connecting to domestic power system by formal contract: 50% - With LUKU prepaid ­ 42% Water supply service and - Hse connection : 10% Satisfaction : satisfaction : - From neighbour : 66% - Quality : 55% Boiling : 63% - Vendors purchase : 4% - Reliability : 36% - Wells : 61% - Adequate : 45% Water supply costs and Costs Fetching Distance / time : fetching distance - monthly : TShs 2,584 / HH Nil / hse connection : 8% - per bucket from kiosks : 60TShs 100m / 10 mins : 40% - per bucket from wells : 32 TShs 250m / 25 mins : 21% - per bucket Vendors : - TShs 400m / 40 mins : 8% Consumption daily : 5.3 buckets > 400m / > 1 hr : 1% Stormwater Drainage Flooding during rainfall : Always ­ 26% Occassionally ­ 43% never ­ 29% Flooding period : Many days ­ 7% one day ­ 6% few hours ­ 43% nil ­ 29% Damage to properties : my house ­ 23% others houses ­ 16% road damage ­ 21% erosion ­ 6% no damage ­ 45% Sanitation : Facilities : Discharge wastewater : - Internal WC with Septic tank : 5% - storm ditches - 7% - External WC with Septic tank : 7% - pit latrine ­ 61% - Pit Latrine : 83% - septic tank / soakpit ­ 20% - Neighbours and others : 2% Sullage (grey water) : Wash clothes : Satisfaction of system : - inside the house ­ 17% - full / overflow ­ 5% - outside ­ 65% - smell ­ 0% Sulage discharge : - rodents ­ 8% - storm ditches ­ 15% - satisfactory ­ 75% - on open ground ­ 60% - pit latrine ­ 10% - septic tank ­ 2% Solid Waste Collection : Service : Collection frequency : 1 times / 3week - municipal stations - 8% Cost for waste collection : Tshs 370/ month - private service providers ­ 33% Distance to station : 1 minutes - burn at the plot ­ 23% - dispose open grounds ­ 15% - dispose in storm ditches ­ 15% Street Lights : Crime last year: Believe crime due to no street lights ­ 94% - experienced - 15% - injured during robbery ­ 13% CIUP Phase II M M K 54 RAP - CIUP Phase II Kichangani Sub-Ward ­ Azimio Ward ­ Temeke District Item Parameter 1. Population - Family size 3.49 person/HH - Gender - Male: 46.0% - Female: 53.0% - Age structure - Under 18: 36.1% - From 18 to 60: 59.9%% - Over 60: 4.0% 2. Education - Nil: 21.7% - Primary: 68.0% - Secondary School: 8.7% - College, University: 0.6% 3. Employment - Permanent: 11.4% - Self Employed: 43.1% - Unemployed: 10.0% - Retired : 0.5% - Housewife : 30.3% - Temporary Employment : 4.7% 4. Household income - Low income under 150,000 TShs/HH/ month: 49% - From 151,000 ­ 250,000 TShs/HH/month : 20% - From 251,000 ­ 350,000 TShs/HH/month : 8% - From 351,000 - 450.000 TShs/HH/ month: 1% - From 451,000 ­ 1,000,000 TShs/HH/ month : 0% - Over 1,0500,000 TShs/HH/month: 0.% 5. Expenses - Food and drink: 50.1% - Transportation: 7.8% - Electricity: 1.0% - House rent: 3.9% - Water supply, drainage: 3.1% - Clothes : 6.0% - Solid waste: 0.8% - School fees 1.6% - Health : 3.4% - Cell phone : 5.0% - Kerosene / charcoal : 17.1% 6. Basic infrastructure Housing: - Average plot size : 302.9sqm - Average house size : 116.8 sqm (including out houses) - Occupancy : 3.35 HH/House - Per Capita House Size : 10.0 m2/person Type of house: - Mud and other : 3% CGI Roof : 99% - Mud Blocks : 0% Concrete Roof Slab : 0% - Cement Blocks : 97% Other Roof : 1% - Plastered Wall : 48% Housing ownership: - Private: 19% With Ownership legal papers : 16% - Rent from private owner: 81% House Use : - Business Only : 0.% - Residential Only : 81% - Combined : 9% Other House Features - With Kitchen : 20% - With W.C : 97% - With Shower : 65% Transportation Mode : Walk - 32% Cycle ­ 2% Bus ­ 51% motorcycle ­ 1% cars ­ 1% Access width : Nil ­ 5% 1 to 2m ­ 25% 2 to 5m ­ 55% > 5m ­ 15% Vehicle Access : up to house ­ 70% 100m / 5 mins ­ 57% 500m / 10 mins ­ 5% > 1km 0% To Bus Stop : 100m / 5 min ­ 36% 500m / 10 mins ­ 36% > 1km 18% Access to Social services - Health : Hospital ­ 43% Dispensary ­ 53% Clinic - 77% - School : Nursery ­ 94% Primary ­ 87% Secondary ­ 19% - Markets : Main ­ 11% Small ­ 80% Mid ­ 64% CIUP Phase II M M K 55 RAP - CIUP Phase II Diseases - Malaria ­ 48% Cholera ­ 3% Dysentery ­ 1% Diahorrea ­ 4% - HIV / AIDS ­ 0% Bronchitis ­ 1% Worms ­ 1% Skin ­ 1% - STD ­ 0% Eyes ­ 1% Domestic power: - Connecting to domestic power system by formal contract: 38% - With LUKU prepaid ­ 15% Water supply service and - Hse connection : 3% Satisfaction : satisfaction : - From neighbour : 96% - Quality : 58% Boiling : 27% - Vendors purchase : 1% - Reliability : 54% - Wells : 75% - Adequate : 73% Water supply costs and Costs Fetching Distance / time : fetching distance - monthly : TShs 649 / HH Nil / hse connection : 11% - per bucket from kiosks : 5.50 TShs 100m / 10 mins : 69% - per bucket from wells : 18 TShs 250m / 25 mins : 2% - per bucket Vendors : - TShs 400m / 40 mins : 0% Consumption daily : 6.5 buckets > 400m / > 1 hr : 0% Stormwater Drainage Flooding during rainfall : Always ­ 13% Occasionally ­ 15% never ­ 3% Flooding period : Many days ­ 3% one day ­ 6% few hours ­ 54% nil ­ 35% Damage to properties : my house ­ 9% others houses ­ 13% road damage ­ 42% erosion ­ 9% no damage ­ 41% Sanitation : Facilities : Discharge wastewater : - Internal WC with Septic tank : 1% - storm ditches - 1% - External WC with Septic tank : 7% - pit latrine ­ 93% - Pit Latrine : 92% - septic tank / soak pit ­ 6% - Neighbours and others : 0% Sullage (grey water) : Wash clothes : Satisfaction of system : - inside the house ­ 0% - full / overflow ­ 0% - outside ­ 12% - smell ­ 0% Sulage discharge : - rodents ­ 12% - storm ditches ­ 5% - satisfactory ­ 87% - on open ground ­ 90% - pit latrine ­ 2% - septic tank ­ 3% Solid Waste Collection : Service : Collection frequency : 1 times / week - municipal stations - 0% Cost for waste collection : Tshs 802 / - private service providers ­ 95% month - burn at the plot ­ 3% Distance to station : 0.5 minutes - dispose open grounds ­ 1% - dispose in storm ditches ­ 0% Street Lights : Crime last year: Believe crime due to no street lights ­ - experienced - 39% 98% - injured during robbery ­ 6% CIUP Phase II M M K 56 RAP - CIUP Phase II ANNEX 5 ­TENANTS AND BUSINESS IN AFFECTED CIUP Phase II M M K 57 ANNEX NO. 5 ILALA MUNICIPALITY ­ TENANTS AND BUSNESS SUBWARD NUMBER OF NUMBER OF TENANTS BUSNESS OWNERS 1 Kombo 3 2 2 Mtakuja - - 3 Miembeni 21 5 Total 24 7 KINONDONI MUNICIPALITY ­ TENANTS AND BUSNESS SUBWARD NUMBER OF NUMBER OF BUSNESS TENANTS OWNERS 1 Kwa kopa 15 22 2 Kigogo Kati 3 3 3 Kigogo Mbuyuni - 3 4 Kigogo Mkwajuni 3 3 Total 21 31 TEMEKE MUNICIPALITY ­ TENANTS AND BUSNESS SUBWARD NUMBER OF NUMBER OF TENANTS BUSNESS OWNERS 1 Keko Mwanga A 8 20 2 Keko Mwanga B - 9 3 Keko Magurumbasi A 24 12 4 Keko Mfereji - - 5 Azimio Kichangani 14 5 6 Azimio Kusini 7 1 7 Azimio Tambukareli 7 2 8 Azimio Mtongani 1 1 9 Azimio Kaskazini 8 3 Total 69 53 ANNEX 6 ­IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE RAP - CIUP Phase II Months / Years No. Activity YEAR 1 2009 YEAR 2 2010 YEAR 3 2011 0 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D CIUP PHASE 2 ­ RAP A PREPARATION OF DESIGN, TENDER DOCUMENTS B COMPILE DRAFT RAP 1. IDENTIFICATION OF AFFECTED PROPERTIES 2. PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS 3. VALUATION AND COMPENSATION CALCULATION 4. REVIEW OF DRAFT RAP C COMPILE AND APPROVAL OF FINAL RAP 1. RESURVEY OF AFFECTED PROPERTIES 2. BASELINE SURVEY OF AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS 3. PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS 4. VALUATION AND COMPENSATION CALCULATION 5. NEGOTIATIONS AND COMPENSATION CONTRACTS 6. RAP APPROVAL D GRIEVANCES AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION SCHEME E PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION F RESETTLEMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM G COMMENCE DEMOLITION AND ACQUISITION H MONITORING AND EVALUATION - REPORTING CIUP Phase II M M K 28 ANNEX 7 ­ ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE RAP - CIUP Phase II CITY COUNCIL Approve the resettlement program and ensure full participation by communities and control decision making by people concerned MUNICIPAL DIRECTOR URBAN PLANNING AND FINANCE ADMINISTRATIVE In charge of the entire ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE Development Program COMMITTEE Scrutinize the budget for - Scrutinize the entire resettlement activities upgrading program - Approve action plans including RAP FINANCE DEPARTMENT Pay compensation DISASTER MANAGEMENT Advice the Project Affected PLANNING AND WARD EXECUTIVE OFFICE people or Resettlement COORDINATION - Undertake task / ventures designed to ensure welfare of the DEPARTMENT ward residents Coordinate upgrading - Monitor and coordinate all activities pf / in sub-wards programs - Receive complains and grievances and submit them to the Municipal Director including RAP COUNCILORS TOWN PLANNING SECTION Advice the program office Execute Regularization on Resettlement Program SUB-WARD CHAIRMAN - Resolving specific community issues CIUP COORDINATOR - Records of project affected people - Ensure participation - Forward any complains to councillors - Baseline surveys - Initial assessment of grievances and - RAP Monitoring disputes - maintain Dossiers and Database COMMUNITY PLANNING TEAM VALUATION SECTION - Identify affected properties and - Identify affected properties persons and owners - Advise project affected families - property valuation of - Assist the project affected families affected properties - compile RAP and compensation contracts - assist during compensation payments and grievances LAND OFFICER Administration of Plots applications for resettlement and signing transfer contracts CIUP Phase II M M K 26 www.snclavalin.com SNC-LAVALIN International 2275 Upper Middle Road East Oakville, Ontario Canada, L6H 0C3 Telephone: (905) 829-8808 Fax: (905) 829-8809