72399 rev INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION AND THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND REPUBLIC OF GUINEA Enhanced Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Initiative Completion Point Document and Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative Prepared by the Staffs of the International Monetary Fund and the International Development Association Approved by Makhtar Diop and Otaviano Canuto (IDA), Doris Ross and Thomas Dorsey (IMF) September 5, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... i I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................1 II. Assessment of Requirements for Reaching the Floating Completion Point ........................2 A. Poverty Reduction .................................................................................................................4  B. Macroeconomic and Structural Reforms...............................................................................6  C. Governance and Anti-Corruption Actions ..........................................................................11  D. Education ............................................................................................................................13  E. Health ..................................................................................................................................14 III. Updated Debt Relief and Sustainability Analysis ..............................................................15 A. Revision of Data Reconciliation as of the Decision Point ................................................15  B. Revision of HIPC Assistance and Status of Creditor Participation ...................................16  C. Considerations for Exceptional Topping-Up Assistance ...................................................19  D. Creditor Participation in the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative........................................20  E. Debt Sustainability Outlook After HIPC and MDRI Assistance, 2011–31 .......................21  F. Sensitivity Analysis and Long-Term Debt Sustainability ..................................................23 IV. Conclusions ............................................................................................................................24 V. Issues for Discussions ..............................................................................................................25 Tables 1. Selected Economic and Financial Indicators, 2008–16 ....................................................... 10 2. Factors Affecting PV of Debt-to-Exports Ration at End-December 2011 .......................... 20 A1. Comparison of Discount Rate and Exchange Rate Assumptions ........................................ 30 A2. Revised Nominal Stocks and Net Present Value of Debt at Decision Point by Creditor Groups as of End-1999 ....................................................................................... 31 A3. Nominal and Present Value of External Debt Outstanding at End-December 2011 ........... 32 A4. Revised Nominal and Present Value of Debt at Decision Point by Creditor Groups as of End-1999 ....................................................................................... 33 A5. External Debt Service .......................................................................................................... 34 A6. Present Value of External Debt............................................................................................ 36 A7. Key External Debt Indicators, 2011–31............................................................................... 38 A8. Sensitivity Analysis, 2011–31 ............................................................................................. 39 A9. Delivery of IDA Assistance Under the Enhanced HIPC Initiative and the MDRI, 2012–45 ................................................................................................... 40 A10. Possible Delivery of IMF Assistance under the Enhanced HIPC Initiative and the MDRI, 2000–19 ................................................................................................... 41 A11. Status of Creditor Participation Under the Enhanced HIPC Initiative ................................ 42 A12. Paris Club Creditors' Delivery of Debt Relief Under Bilateral Initiatives Beyond the HIPC Initiative .............................................................................................. 43 A13. HIPC Initiative: Status of Country Cases Considered Under the Initiative, June 30, 2012 ................................................................................... 44 Figures A1. Composition of External Debt by Creditor Groups, End-1999 and End-2011 .................... 27 A2. External Debt Service Indicators for Medium- and Long-Term Public Sector Debt, 2011–31 ............................................................................................ 28 A3. Sensitivity of Long-Term Debt Sustainability after Shocks, 2011–31 ................................ 29 Boxes 1. Status of Floating Completion Point Triggers ..................................................................... 4 2. Macroeconomic Assumptions for 2011–32 ........................................................................ 22 Appendices I. Debt Management ................................................................................................................ 45 II. Joint Bank-Fund Debt Sustainability Analysis Under the Debt Sustainability Framework for Low-Income Countries ........................................... 47 LIST OF ACRONYMS AfDB/AfDF African Development Bank/African Development Fund AFRITAC African Regional Technical Assistance Center ANLC National Anti Corruption Agency BADEA Arab Bank for Economic Development in Africa CNLS Anti Corruption Committee CNT National Transition Committee CWIQ Core Welfare Indicators Questionnaire Survey DHS Demographic and Health Survey DRA Debt Relief Analysis DTP3 Diphtheria, Tetanus and Pertussis ECOWAS Economic Community of West African States EBID ECOWAS Bank for Investment and Development ECF Extended Credit Facility EFA-FTI Education For All-Fast Track Initiative EIB European Investment Bank EIBEP Enquête Intégrée de Base pour l’Evaluation de la Pauvreté (Integrated Baseline Household Expenditure Survey) EU European Union GDP Gross Domestic Product GNF Guinean Franc HIPC Heavily Indebted Poor Country IDA International Development Association IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development IMF International Monetary Fund IsDB Islamic Development Bank JSAN Joint Staff Advisory Note LIC-DSA Low-Income Country Debt Sustainability Analysis MDG Millennium Development Goal MDRI Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative MFI Micro-Finance Institution MICS Multiple Indicators Cluster Survey NGO Non Governmental Organization NSO National Statistical Office ODA Official Development Assistance OFID OPEC Fund for International Development OPEC Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries PPA Participatory Poverty Assessment PPG Public and Publicly Guaranteed PR Progress Report PRGF Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility PRSP Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper PV Present Value SIMFER Simandou Fer (Simandou Iron Ore Project) SMP Staff-Monitored Program UNDP United Nations Development Program i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. In December 2000, the Boards of Executive Directors of IDA and the IMF agreed that the Republic of Guinea had met the requirements for reaching the Decision Point under the Enhanced Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative. The amount of debt relief committed at the decision point was $545 million in end-1999 present value (PV) terms, calculated to reduce the PV of eligible external debt to 150 percent of exports at end-1999. This relief implied a common reduction factor of 31.6 percent. 2. In the view of the staffs of IDA and the IMF, Guinea has made satisfactory progress in meeting the requirements for reaching the floating completion point. The key decisions, actions and measures required to fulfil all but one of the triggers have been taken, including the preparation of a full Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) and its satisfactory implementation for at least one year (Trigger #1); improvement of the poverty database and monitoring capacity (Trigger #2); continued maintenance of macroeconomic stability as evidenced by satisfactory implementation of the PRGF supported program (Trigger #3)1; develop and take steps to provide an appropriate regulatory framework for microcredit institutions (Trigger #4); publication of a progress report on the activities of the Anti-Corruption Committee (Trigger #5); increase in gross enrolment rates for girls and boys in primary schools (Trigger #7); annual increase in the number of primary school teachers (Trigger #8); increase in DTP3 vaccination coverage (Trigger #9); and increase in the percentage of pregnant women receiving prenatal consultations (Trigger #10). With regard to the audit of all government procurement contracts over GNF 100 million (Trigger #6), very good progress was made, although, given the limited capacity, starting from 2008 the authorities followed a less ambitious but more practical system of quarterly audits, covering a representative sample of large contracts. The authorities are requesting a waiver for not having audited all contracts; the staffs of the IDA and the IMF support this request since the broad objective of the trigger was achieved, and implementation has improved. 3. The required HIPC assistance in end-1999 PV terms has been revised upward to $639 million. As a result of the debt reconciliation exercise for the completion point, the PV of eligible external debt has increased, while the estimate of exports was decreased. Consequently, the required HIPC assistance to reduce the PV of debt to exports to 150 percent has increased by $93.7 million, from $545.4 million estimated at the decision point to $639 million. Correspondingly, the common reduction factor has increased from 31.6 percent to 36.2 percent. $383 million would be delivered by multilateral creditors and $256 million by bilateral and commercial creditors. 4. Guinea does not qualify for topping-up under the Enhanced HIPC Initiative based on end-2011 debt data. 5. Creditors accounting for 97.5 percent of total HIPC eligible debt have given satisfactory assurances of their participation in the enhanced HIPC Initiative. Nearly all 1 The Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) has been succeeded by the Extended Credit Facility (ECF). ii multilateral creditors and Paris Club creditors have agreed to participate. The authorities are working toward obtaining participation of all the remaining creditors.2 6. Upon reaching the completion point under the Enhanced HIPC Initiative, Guinea will also qualify for additional debt relief under the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI). Debt relief under the MDRI would cover most remaining debt service obligations to IDA and the African Development Fund (AfDF). MDRI relief would save Guinea $964 million in debt service over 40 years. 7. Full delivery of HIPC, additional bilateral assistance beyond HIPC, and MDRI debt relief at the completion point would reduce Guinea’s external debt burden significantly. The PV of debt-to-exports ratio would fall from 186.0 percent at end-2011 to 48.9 percent at end-2012. Thereafter, it is projected to fall further to 17.7 percent at end-2031, mainly attributable to an increase in exports following the start of production of a mining project in 2015. However, the future evolution of these indicators will be sensitive to the macroeconomic assumptions, particularly exports and the terms of new external financing, as well as government policy. In particular, sound macroeconomic management, further progress with structural reform, and strengthened debt management will be important for debt sustainability. 8. Looking ahead, Guinea’s large untapped mining resources offer the potential for a substantial boost in growth and poverty reduction. To ensure an effective exploitation of these resources in which the country reaps an equitable share of the rewards, the government should promote good governance and transparency in the sector. The government should also seek to minimize any financial risks from its participation in the sector that could compromise fiscal and external debt sustainability. 9. The staffs recommend that the Executive Directors of IDA and the IMF approve the completion point for Guinea under the Enhanced HIPC Initiative. 2 This is discussed in Paragraphs 32, 40 and 41. 1 I. INTRODUCTION 1. This paper discusses the Republic of Guinea’s progress towards reaching the floating completion point under the Enhanced Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative. In the view of the staffs of the International Development Association (IDA) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Guinea has satisfactorily implemented the completion point triggers as formulated in the December 2000 HIPC Decision Point document.3 In the view of the two staffs this progress is sufficient for recommending to their respective Boards the approval of the completion point for Guinea under the Enhanced HIPC Initiative. 2. The Executive Boards of IDA and the IMF declared Guinea to be eligible for assistance under the Enhanced HIPC Initiative in December 2000. The Executive Boards of IDA and the IMF determined that Guinea had reached the decision point for the Enhanced HIPC Initiative and agreed on the triggers for the floating completion point (Box 5, page 28 of the Decision Point Document). At the decision point, the present value (PV) of debt relief required to reduce the external public debt of Guinea to sustainable levels was estimated at $545 million calculated as of end-December 1999. Such relief represented an overall reduction of 31.6 percent of the PV of all public and publicly-guaranteed external debt as of end- December 1999 after the application of traditional debt relief. At the same time, the two Boards approved interim debt relief to Guinea. IMF interim relief was suspended from March 2004 to November 2007 and from June 2009 to January 2012, because Guinea was not supported under a formal IMF arrangement, 4 Guinea reached the ceiling for HIPC interim relief provided by IDA of 33 percent of committed debt (in PV terms) on November 15, 2005. Interim relief was resumed in May 2008 when IDA’s ceiling was raised to 50 percent.5 Guinea’s progress towards meeting the requirements for the completion point was impeded by political instability, including a military coup d’état in 2008. Following the election of a civilian government in December 2010, Guinea restarted its efforts to meet the completion point triggers. 3. The paper is organised as follows. Section II assesses Guinea’s performance in meeting the requirements for reaching the floating completion point under the enhanced HIPC Initiative. Section III provides an updated debt relief analysis (DRA). Section IV summarises the main conclusions and Section V presents issues for discussion. 3 See "Republic of Guinea: Enhanced Initiative for Heavily Indebted Poor Country – Decision Point Document", IDA/R2000-4, January 10, 2000), and EBS/03/267, December 20, 2000. 4 Guinea’s performance under IMF-supported programs: a three-year PRGF arrangement was approved in May 2001, but the program went off-track in December 2002 following the completion of the first review and expired in May 2004. A staff-monitored program (SMP) covering April 2005 through March 2006 was satisfactorily implemented but negotiations on a subsequent PRGF-arrangement collapsed amid policy slippages and social unrest. A new three-year PRGF arrangement for July 2007–June 2010 was approved on December 21, 2007. The first review of this arrangement was concluded on July 28, 2008, but the second review could not be completed following the military coup in December 2008 and the arrangement expired in June 2010. An SMP covering 2011 was satisfactorily implemented, which paved the way to a program supported under the Extended Credit Facility, covering 2012–15. 5 Republic of Guinea: Revised Schedule of IDA’s HIPC Debt Relief, IDA/Sec M2007-0712, December 26, 2007. 2 II. ASSESSMENT OF REQUIREMENTS FOR REACHING THE FLOATING COMPLETION POINT 4. In the view of the staffs of IDA and the IMF, Guinea made sufficient progress for reaching the floating completion point (Box 1). All but one of the triggers have been met; the remaining trigger (Trigger #6) has not been fully met but the broad objective was maintained, and the authorities requested a waiver. All key decisions, actions and measures required to fulfil the triggers have been taken, with respect to the preparation of a full Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) and its satisfactory implementation for at least one year (Trigger #1); improvement of the poverty database and monitoring capacity (Trigger #2); continued maintenance of macroeconomic stability as evidenced by satisfactory implementation of the PRGF-supported program (Trigger #3);6 develop and take steps to provide an appropriate regulatory framework for microcredit institutions (Trigger #4); publication of a progress report on the activities of the Anti-Corruption Committee (Trigger #5); increase in gross enrolment rates for girls and boys in primary schools (Trigger #7); annual increase in the number of primary school teachers (Trigger #8); increase in DTP3 vaccination coverage (Trigger #9); and increase in the percentage of pregnant women receiving prenatal consultations (Trigger #10). 5. Progress in meeting triggers was, nonetheless, much slower than initially anticipated. At the decision point in 2000, the Authorities were aiming to reach the completion point in 2002. However, macroeconomic stabilisation programs and market oriented reforms initiated in the 1990s were halted soon after the Decision Point under pressure of vested interests. The repression of civil and political liberties, combined with widespread corruption, resulted in disastrous development outcomes and frequent urban social unrest. In late 2008, a military junta seized power, which prompted the international community to stop then formal relationship with (and suspend disbursements to) Guinea. Fiscal control was abandoned during 2009-10 and poverty increased. The new government that was established after the first free and fair presidential elections since Guinea’s independence in 1958 at end- December 2010 restarted the process toward macroeconomic stabilization and structural reform. As a result, some of the significant development outcomes (e.g. Health and Education) envisaged to be attained two years after the decision point, were only attained a decade later. 6 The Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) has been succeeded by the Extended Credit Facility (ECF). 3 Box 1. Guinea: Status of Floating Triggers (as of end-July 2012) Triggers Assessment Poverty Reduction 1. Preparation of a full PRSP through a participatory Met. Implementation of the PRSP-II issued in 2007 was process and its satisfactory implementation for one interrupted by the military coup of December 2008. The year as evidenced by the Joint Staff Assessment of the Government formed after the presidential election at end- country’s annual progress report. 2010 extended the PRSP-II over the 2011-12 period. A full one-year progress report on implementation of the strategy during 2011 was submitted to IDA and the IMF in May 2012. A Joint Staff Advisory Note on the annual progress report, confirming satisfactory implementation of the PRSP during 2011, is being presented to the Boards of IDA and the IMF in parallel with this enhanced HIPC initiative completion point report. 2. Improvement of the poverty database and Met. A comprehensive poverty assessment survey was monitoring capacity by preparing a living standards conducted in 2002/3. Thereafter the poverty database was measurement survey that establishes poverty lines and improved and updated. Based on the household survey, 54 indicators based thereon, and establishment of a poverty indicators were formulated. Two new surveys were poverty monitoring system involving key stakeholders. conducted in 2007/8 and 2012. The results of the 2012 survey were validated in a meeting including key stakeholders on July 30, 2012. 3. Continued maintenance of macroeconomic stability Met. A PRGF-supported program approved on December as evidenced by satisfactory implementation of the 21, 2007 went off-track after the first review. Since 2011, the PRGF-supported program. Government has established a strong track record under the IMF Staff-Monitored Program and under a program supported under the Extended Credit Facility (ECF) for 2012-15, approved by the IMF Board on February 24, 2012. The report on the satisfactory first review of the ECF- supported program is being presented to the Board of the IMF in parallel with this enhanced HIPC Initiative completion point report. 4. Develop and take steps to provide an appropriate Met. A new law was passed by Parliament in November regulatory framework for microcredit institutions. 2005, establishing a regulatory framework for microcredit institutions; and implementing regulations were approved. Governance and Anticorruption 5. Make publicly available a one-year progress report Met. Activity reports of the CNLS, covering the years 2007- (showing resources and activities) of the Anti- 11, have been published, and are accessible on the Corruption Committee (CNLS). Government’s website (http://www.srp-guinee.org/). 6. Audit all government procurement contracts over Not completed, but satisfactory progress has been made. GNF 100 million and publish results of these audits on The government commissioned a comprehensive audit of all a quarterly basis. government contracts over 2002–04 and a final audit report was completed in 2007. A system of quarterly audits based on a representative sample of large government contracts was put in place in 2008. Reports covering 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and the first semester of 2011 have been completed. The audited sample represented 70 percent of the public contracts in 2009-10. The audit reports were published (in the Official Journal of the Government of Guinea in May 2012 and the Procurement Gazette). 4 Box 1. Guinea: Status of Floating Triggers (as of end-July 2012) (concluded) Triggers Assessment Education 7. Increase the gross enrollment rate for primary Met. Gross enrollment increased significantly after 2002, school students from 56 percent in 1999 to 62 reaching 79 percent in 2006 and 80 percent in 2011. Gross percent in 2001 and 71 percent in 2002, of enrollment for girls reached 71 percent in 2006 and 73 which the gross enrollment rate of girls should percent in 2011. be 40 percent in 1999, 51 percent in 2001 and 61 percent in 2002. 8. Increase the number of new primary school Met. On average 1,673 primary school teachers have been teachers hired by at least 1,500 a year for each recruited and trained each year from 2001 through 2011. year until the HIPC completion point, from an estimated base of about 15,000 primary school teachers in 2000. Health 9. Increase immunization (DTP3: diphtheria, Met. Immunization coverage of DPT3 reached 88 percent in tetanus, pertussis) rates for children under 1 2011. year of age, from 45 percent in 2000, to 50 percent in 2001, and to 55 percent in 2002. 10. Improve the percentage of pregnant women Met. 88 percent of pregnant women had at least one ante- benefiting from at least 1 prenatal consultation natal care consultation in 2011. from 70 percent in 2000, to 80 percent in 2001, and to 85 percent in 2002. A. Poverty Reduction Trigger #1: A full PRSP has been prepared through a participatory process and satisfactorily implemented for one year as evidenced by the Joint Staff Advisory Note on the country’s annual progress report. 6. Staffs consider this trigger to have been met. The political instability which afflicted Guinea during the 2000s thwarted the authorities’ efforts to implement its First Poverty Reduction Strategy covering 2002–06 (PRSP-I) issued in December 2001. The Government issued a second PRSP (PRSP-II) covering 2007–10 in August 2007, building on the lessons learnt from the unsuccessful implementation of the PRSP-I. The PRSP-II was discussed by the Boards of the IMF in December 2007 and IDA in January 2008, together with a Joint Staff Advisory Note (JSAN).7 In 2010, the authorities decided to extend the implementation of the PRSP-II until end-2012 to offset the negative impact of political instability and external shocks on key development indicators in 2009 and 2010. The extension was adopted by the government in January 2011 and presented to the National Transitional Committee (CNT) in February 2011. To accelerate implementation of the extended PRSP-II, the government issued President Condé’s Priority Action Plan (2011–12) that articulates a strategy for recovery from the crisis period of 2009–10 (which recorded a significant decline in per capita income) and for laying the foundations for sustained growth and development. The Action Plan addresses the 7 Republic of Guinea: Poverty Reduction Strategy-IDA/SecM2007-489, July 3, 2007. 5 serious fiscal and macroeconomic imbalances stemming from the 2009–10 military regime, and details the reforms to be initiated in 2011 and 2012 to improve the investment climate, to promote private entrepreneurship, to facilitate the integration and access of the Guinean private sector to regional markets, to reform the mining code, and to boost agricultural production. 7. The PRSP-II and its extended version were prepared through extensive and continuing public consultations designed to highlight priority actions needed to improve living standards, particularly in the rural areas, and to obtain stakeholder buy-in to the development strategy.8 The overarching objective of the PRSP-II and its extension is to accelerate economic growth and make progress toward the Millennium Development Goals (MDG). The main pillars of the strategy include: (i) improving governance; (ii) accelerating growth and increasing employment opportunities while further stabilizing the economy; and (iii) improving access to basic services. The strategy was accompanied by an emergency investment program to re-launch economic activities and programs to diversify the economy from overdependence on extractive industries. Such a program was made financeable by the full re-engagement of IDA, following the clearance of arrears to IDA in March 2011. 8. A one-year Progress Report (PR) covering 2011 was prepared by the authorities and discussed with development partners in April 2012. As discussed in the Joint Staff Advisory Note (JSAN) accompanying this report,9 the PR shows that 2011 was a watershed year in terms of the political environment, policy implementation and development outcomes. Major progress was made in restoring political stability and democratic governance, reforming the security sector and containing military expenditures, consultations on justice reforms, and in the fight against corruption, especially through procurement audits and reforms. A significant reduction of fiscal and macroeconomic imbalances was also achieved. The government’s program was strongly supported by the donor community. As a result of sustained implementation of reforms, Guinea’s growth rate increased markedly, inflation declined, foreign exchange reserves increased, and the exchange rate stabilized.10 The delivery of social services was improved, which is a good step towards poverty reduction. The PR also highlights the numerous challenges facing Guinea in the near future, including in particular a demanding agenda for improvements in key areas such as the extractive industries and their possible effect on the economy, human development, infrastructure, governance and institution building. These are the key areas that the authorities aim to cover in the next PRSP (PRSP-III), scheduled for completion in late 2012. Progress in these areas will be supported by continued progress in the area of peace and security. Trigger #2: Improvement of the poverty database and monitoring capacity by preparing a living standards measurement survey which will include establishment of poverty lines and indicators based thereon, and establishment of a poverty monitoring system involving key stakeholders. 8 In particular, regional consultations were held in two major regional centers during January–February 2011 in Kindia (covering the Southern part of the country) and Kankan (covering the Northern part of the country). 9 Joint Staff Advisory Note on the Extended Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper 2011-12 and the 2011 Progress Report, IMF-EBD/12/55, August 30, 2012, and IDA/SecM2012-0459, September 10, 2012. 10 Recent macroeconomic and financial developments are discussed in the report of the IMF staff on the first review under the ECF-arrangement. 6 9. Staffs consider this trigger to have been met. Two household surveys carried out in 2002/03 (Enquête Intégrée de Base pour l’Evaluation de la Pauvreté, EIBEP) and in 2007/08 (using the Core Welfare Indicators Questionnaire Survey, CWIQ) were used to establish poverty lines and poverty profiles for Guinea, and lay the foundations for improved poverty monitoring and evaluation. To strengthen further the poverty data base, the Government launched two additional surveys: the Multiple Indicators Cluster Survey (MICS) 2007/08, and the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) in 2008. In 2012, a new household survey was conducted, using the CWIQ methodology and including an expenditure module. A participatory Poverty Assessment (PPA) survey was also conducted in January–February 2011. The PPA complemented the other available surveys by providing qualitative information on poverty profiles and households’ coping strategies. 10. The various surveys carried out since 2000 have strengthened the capacity of the National Statistical Office (NSO) to monitor poverty and evaluate policy outcomes. Poverty monitoring is under the responsibility of a Committee established at the Poverty Reduction Strategy Secretariat headed by the Director of the NSO. The Committee, which meets once a month, has spearheaded the Government’s efforts in preparing the 2011 PRSP progress report and liaising with development partners on various statistical issues. The NSO has completed preparatory work on a Decennial Population Census slated for late 2012. With assistance from the World Bank, a poverty assessment report has been prepared and disseminated in the country in July 2012, and follow up work on more micro dimensions of poverty are scheduled for the next 12 months. 11. Nevertheless, the latest data show an aggravation of poverty during the last decade. The household surveys conducted using the CWIQ methodology suggest significant increases in poverty rates from 49.0 percent in 2002 to 53.0 percent in 2007 and to 55.0 percent in 2012. Further disaggregation of the 2012 CWIQ survey by gender shows that the literacy rate for women is 22.8 percent compared with 47.2 percent for men. However, the primary school enrollment rate for girls is 55.4 percent compared with 60.0 percent for boys. The results of the CWIQ survey provides solid analytical basis for poverty monitoring and evaluation. B. Macroeconomic and Structural Reforms Trigger #3: Continued maintenance of macroeconomic stability as evidenced by satisfactory implementation of the PRGF-supported program. 12. Staffs consider this trigger to have been met. Following episodes of large economic imbalances after the 2000 decision point, the government has implemented strong measures to restore macroeconomic stability since early-2011. The economy has been periodically destabilized by a combination of external and internal factors since the 2000 Decision Point. Regional political instability caused a massive influx of refugees in 2002. The country experienced adverse terms-of-trade shocks, particularly in 2003–05, as prices for its mineral exports (accounting for more than 90 percent of overall exports) declined. Persistent social upheaval and bad governance led to episodes of policy slippage, high inflation, depletion of international reserves, and exchange rate depreciation between 2002 and 2010. Stabilization policies started in 2007 were short-lived as the military coup at end-2008 brought back large economic imbalances: the budget deficit and central bank advances reached 1 percent of GDP 7 per month during 2009–10; reserves coverage fell to less than one month of imports; the market exchange rate depreciated sharply and inflation increased to over 20 percent (year-on-year) by end-2010; and Guinea accumulated external arrears to bilateral and multilateral creditors, including IDA. In early-2011, the newly elected government took corrective actions to address the imbalances. Under the Staff Monitored Program (SMP) with the IMF, covering 2011, fiscal control was restored; monetary policy was tightened, and macro-critical structural reforms were launched; and external arrears to IDA and other multilateral creditors were cleared. The satisfactory performance under the SMP paved the way for a program supported under the IMF’s Extended Credit Facility (ECF) covering the period 2012-15, approved by the IMF’s executive Board on February 24, 2012.11 13. Fiscal performance has been satisfactory since 2011, anchored on cash-based expenditure management. In 2011, fiscal adjustment was stronger than programmed. The basic fiscal deficit was reduced from about 13 percent of GDP in 2010 to less than 2 percent of GDP in 2011. Several revenue measures were implemented but the adjustment came mainly from the elimination of low-priority spending and the suspension of large non-competitively awarded procurement contracts for goods and services and investment projects committed during 2009–10. Bank financing of the treasury was virtually stopped with the enforcement of cash-based management of the budget; the receipt of large exceptional mining revenue in May 2011 allowed the start of an increase in macro-critical public investment, especially in the electricity sector. Fiscal discipline continued during the first half of 2012, under the ECF-supported program. The revenue target for end-June 2012 was met despite mounting fuel subsidies as the authorities decided to keep domestic prices unchanged as import prices increased. Expenditure was largely below the programmed level as the authorities tried to make room for a large expenditure overflow from 2011 and to address the delay in expected new exceptional mining revenue. Budget execution also benefitted from the retirement of 4,000 military personnel in 2011. The basic fiscal deficit was much below the end-June program target and all quantitative performance criteria (adjusted for the shortfall in exceptional revenue) under the ECF-supported program for end-June 2012 were met with the exception of that on the accumulation of external debt service arrears, for which staff supports that a waiver be granted. 14. Monetary policy was appropriately tightened, aimed at reducing excess liquidity. The policy slippages in 2009–10 created large excess liquidity, high inflation, and a substantial premium in the market exchange rate over the official rate. In 2011, the central bank raised the policy rate from 16.75 to 22.0 percent and the reserve requirement from 9.5 to 22.0 percent. Regulations on foreign exchange bureaus were improved and the central bank started weekly foreign exchange auctions in March 2011. As a result, inflation declined from 21.0 percent at end-2010 to 15.0 percent in June 2012 (year-on-year); the exchange rate stabilized and the market exchange rate premium shrunk to below 2.0 percent in the first half of 2012. In April 2012, the government reached agreement on a rescheduling of external debt with Paris Club 11 Guinea’s performance under IMF-supported programs: a three-year PRGF arrangement was approved in May 2001, but the program went off-track in December 2002 following the completion of the first review and expired in May 2004. A staff-monitored program (SMP) covering April 2005 through March 2006 was satisfactorily implemented but negotiations on a subsequent PRGF-arrangement collapsed amid policy slippages and social unrest. A new three-year PRGF arrangement for July 2007–June 2010 was approved on December 21, 2007. The first review of this arrangement was concluded on July 28, 2008, but the second review could not be completed following the military coup in December 2008 and the arrangement expired in June 2010. 8 creditors and the authorities are seeking debt relief on comparable terms from private and other bilateral creditors. 15. Good progress has also been made on structural reforms since 2011. The new mining code adopted in September 2011 is expected to improve transparency in the sector and raise government revenue; implementation regulations of this new mining code are being prepared, with World Bank and IMF support. Strategic and technical committees were set up to review and renegotiate existing mining contracts in line with the new code to ensure that the government obtains a fair share of revenue from Guinea’s abundant mineral resources. A Special Investment Fund was created to receive exceptional mining revenue and ensure its transparent and efficient use. Based on an action plan agreed with development partners in early 2012, the authorities have started to reform the electricity sector, aimed at restoring financial viability of the state-owned electricity company and increasing supply. The agricultural sector received strong support, through the government’s facilitation of access to fertilizers and equipment. The on-going reforms in the agricultural and electricity sectors are expected to reduce budget subsidies in the near future. Reforms to improve the business climate are under way, including the creation of an investment promotion agency in 2011 and a revision of the Investment Code by mid-2013. 16. Growth rebounded in 2011, supported by expanding agricultural production, growing investment in the mining sector, and improved confidence in the business environment. The growth rate of real GDP averaged 2.8 percent over 2001–08, down from 4.4 percent in the previous decade. Following the military coup, growth dropped below 1 percent in 2009–10. It recovered to almost 4 percent in 2011 and is expected to reach 4.8 percent in 2012, despite the difficult world economic environment. Guinea’s external position strengthened in 2011; the external current account deficit improved by 3.5 percent of GDP, and the level of gross foreign exchange reserves increased to the equivalent of 4.5 months of imports.12 17. While Guinea has made strong progress in macroeconomic management since early-2011, some challenges remain, which the government is addressing under its reform programs. As in other areas, there are serious capacity constraints in key institutions such as the Central Bank and the Ministry of Economy and Finance. Public financial management needs further improvement, including reforms of the legal framework, the ability to produce a real-time situation in the expenditure chain, and to secure an accurate flow of information between the Treasury, Central Bank, and revenue collecting agencies. The central bank’s systems for accounting and the preparation of monetary statistics need urgent improvement. To encourage broad-based growth and to ensure that an expected mining boom by the middle of the decade results in wide-spread poverty reduction, Guinea will need to address key bottlenecks for economic activity. These include governance, such as reform and strengthening of the judiciary, rebuilding infrastructure, including in roads and electricity; and, more generally, actions to improve the business climate. Strong agricultural sector polices would provide jobs and income to a large part of the population. 12 The high reserve position was mainly due to exceptional mining revenue; reserves are projected to decrease as this revenue will be gradually used, but are expected to be buttressed by the large iron ore production in the middle of this decade. 9 Trigger #4: Develop and take steps to provide an appropriate regulatory framework for microcredit institutions. 18. Staffs consider this trigger to have been met. A new law was passed by Parliament in November 2005 establishing a regulatory framework for micro credit institutions.13 Thereafter implementing regulations were prepared and approved in 2007 and over the next two years training provided to the supervisors with the assistance of the World Bank and the African Regional Technical Assistance Center (AFRITAC) under a multi-donor trust fund. Additional implementing regulation was enacted at the beginning of 2012. As covering the licensing of micro-credit institutions, supervision, sanctions and liquidation, the 2005 law and its implementing regulations constitute significant and necessary steps to provide an appropriate regulatory framework for microcredit institutions. 13 République de Guinée. (La Banque centrale de la République de Guinée), Loi sur la Microfinance- L/2005/020/AN November, 2005. 10 Table 1. Guinea: Selected Economic and Financial Indicators, 2008–16 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Est. Proj. Proj. Proj. Proj. Proj. (Annual percentage change, unless otherwise indicated) National accounts and prices GDP at constant prices 4.9 -0.3 1.9 3.9 4.8 5.0 5.2 19.9 19.7 GDP deflator 14.1 6.8 20.2 19.6 14.7 6.3 7.4 5.2 5.0 GDP at market prices 19.7 6.5 22.5 24.3 20.2 11.7 13.0 26.1 25.7 Consumer prices Average 18.4 4.7 15.5 21.4 14.7 10.3 7.3 6.0 5.9 End of Period 13.5 7.9 20.8 19.0 12.0 8.7 6.2 5.9 5.9 External sector Exports goods & services (in US$ terms) 32.0 -22.1 13.6 12.1 3.0 2.2 5.8 77.5 53.3 Imports goods & services (in US$ terms) 19.6 -21.2 26.2 38.3 48.3 7.2 1.7 13.4 8.8 Average effective exchange rate (depreciation - ) Nominal index -13.4 3.3 -17.0 -18.1 … … … … … Real index -2.2 7.1 -8.2 -3.2 … … … … … Money and credit Net Foreign Assets 1/ 14.3 4.7 -5.5 40.1 -11.6 -1.2 … … … Net Domestic Assets 1/ 24.7 21.2 79.9 -30.7 16.9 11.4 … … … Net Claims on government 1/ 20.8 28.7 70.2 -44.8 17.7 7.6 … … … Credit to nongovernment sector 1/ 1.9 3.1 8.9 15.0 2.0 7.0 … … … Reserve Money 13.8 81.7 73.0 -4.9 -6.2 8.3 … … … Broad money (M2) 39.0 25.9 74.4 9.4 5.3 10.2 … … … Interest rate (short term T-bill) 21.5 15.0 13.0 13.0 ... ... ... ... ... (Percent of GDP) Central government finances 2/ Total revenue and grants 16.1 16.5 15.7 20.3 22.9 24.0 24.9 27.5 28.2 Revenue 15.6 16.2 15.3 16.8 19.2 20.2 20.8 24.1 26.3 Of which : nonmining revenue 12.1 12.9 11.5 13.0 15.0 16.2 16.4 16.7 17.9 Grants 0.5 0.4 0.4 3.4 3.7 3.8 4.1 3.4 1.9 Total expenditure and net lending 17.5 23.7 29.7 21.5 28.3 26.6 26.2 28.4 29.7 Current expenditure 13.4 16.5 20.5 16.3 15.8 16.3 15.6 15.2 15.0 Of which: interest payments 2.6 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 Capital expenditure and net lending 4.0 7.2 9.1 5.2 12.4 10.3 10.5 13.2 14.6 Overall budget balance 2/ Including grants (commitment) -1.3 -7.1 -14.0 -1.3 -5.3 -2.6 -1.3 -0.9 -1.5 Excluding grants (commitment) -1.8 -7.5 -14.4 -4.7 -9.1 -6.4 -5.4 -4.3 -3.4 Basic fiscal balance 1.6 -5.6 -12.6 -1.6 -3.6 -1.4 -0.6 -0.6 0.6 National accounts Gross capital formation 17.5 11.4 10.6 17.6 37.3 44.1 43.9 33.7 19.1 Savings 7.2 1.6 -1.8 1.3 -1.7 4.4 4.8 12.4 14.2 Current account balance Including official transfers -10.3 -9.9 -12.4 -16.3 -39.0 -39.7 -39.2 -21.3 -5.0 Excluding official transfers -10.8 -9.9 -12.4 -18.6 -39.8 -40.7 -40.3 -22.3 -5.0 Overall balance of payments -0.9 5.3 -3.6 10.1 -8.4 -4.0 -0.1 2.4 1.4 (US$ millions, unless otherwise indicated) Memorandum Items: Exports, goods & services 1,578.1 1,229.9 1,397.3 1,566.0 1,613.7 1,648.5 1,743.6 3,095.1 4,745.7 Imports, goods & services 1,810.4 1,427.2 1,800.4 2,490.8 3,693.8 3,958.3 4,026.6 4,564.8 4,966.0 Overall balance of payments -42.4 245.9 -177.8 520.6 -481.3 -247.4 -6.1 179.1 124.7 Net foreign assets (central bank) -14.1 97.9 39.6 637.6 265.7 214.8 260.8 460.6 577.7 Gross available reserves (months of imports) 3/ 0.6 0.8 0.7 4.6 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.7 Nominal GDP (GNF billions) 20,780 22,133 27,118 33,697 40,494 45,219 51,114 64,439 80,983 Sources: Guinean authorities; and Fund staff estimates and projections. 1/ In percent of the broad money stock at the beginning of the period. 2/ The one-off mining revenue in 2011 is included under non-bank financing. 3/ In months of imports excluding imports for large foreign-financed mining projects. 11 19. The Directorate for Supervision of Micro-Finance Institutions (MFI) at the Central Bank was charged in 2006 to implement these new regulations. It has since conducted periodic on and off-site supervision of MFIs and issues regular reports. Since 2005 the sector has experienced net growth and counts today 16 micro finance institutions with 432 offices of which only 7 percent in Conakry. Nonetheless, the effective implementation of supervision is hampered by the low quality of information provided by the MFIs. Many MFIs do not have adequate management information systems and their data provision to the supervisor is lacking important information. Furthermore, the Central Bank in its 2011 report on supervision of MFIs estimates that many MFIs might not be profitable and do not meet required prudential indicators, but sanctions have not yet been imposed. The World Bank’s Finance and Private Sector Unit is exploring the possibility of providing support to strengthen the capacity of the Directorate for supervision of MFI. The Government also established a new Micro Finance Authority, demonstrating the importance the Government gives to the sector and to promote access to credit for micro entrepreneurs. C. Governance and Anti-Corruption Actions Trigger #5: Make publicly available a one-year progress report (showing resources and activities) of the Anticorruption Committee. 20. Staffs consider this trigger to have been met. Reports of the Anti-Corruption Agency, l’Agence Nationale de Lutte contre la Corruption (ANLC), were published in 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011. They provide details on resources and activities, and are available on the government’s websites and the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) local office website.14 The 2011 report highlighted Guinea’s signing, ratification and promulgation of the United Nations and African Union conventions against corruption and the ECOWAS Anti- Corruption Protocol. The report also provided details on the setting up of an office within the ANLC and a telephone hotline to receive complaints from the public regarding the misuse of government resources. A total of 58 complaints were investigated in 2011. 21. The government has taken several actions to improve governance and reduce corruption over recent years. These include major public finance management controls (procurement, treasury single account, cash-based budgeting), a biometric census of civil servants and the military (leading to the removal from the payroll of ghost workers and public sector employees having reached the retirement age), and the establishment of a legal and institutional framework for managing windfall mining resources, along with the reactivation of Guinea’s membership to the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, from which it had been suspended during the period of military rule. It also includes a survey on the perception of corruption in 2003, training for ANLC staff and journalists on economic governance, and the holding of public workshops on corruption. Trigger #6: Audit all government procurement contracts over GNF 100 million and publish results of these audits on a quarterly basis. 14 Government’s website: Secretariat Permanent de la Strategie de Reduction de la Pauvrete, http://www.srp- guinee.org; Institut National de la Statistique, http://www.stat-guinee.org; UNDP local office website: http://www.undp.org/htlm/gv.htlm. 12 22. Staffs consider good progress has been made in fulfilling this trigger. Guinea has gradually improved the auditing of public procurement contracts, albeit not as quickly as was envisaged at the decision point. For lack of resources and various internal disruptions, the authorities had difficulties initially in setting up quarterly audits of all procurement contracts over GNF 100 million ($ 53.2 million equivalent in 2000). Comprehensive audits covering large contracts for 2002–04 were launched with delays, and the related audit report was presented only in 2007. Based on this experience, and in line with best international practice, a less ambitious but more flexible and practical system of quarterly audits, covering a representative sample of large contracts, was formalized using Guinea’s own oversight institutions. This system was implemented starting in 2008. The first report, covering 13 contracts comprising 20 percent of the procurement contracts of more than GNF 100 million signed in the first quarter of 2007, was published in October 2008. Reports on audits of contracts signed in 2008 and the first six months of 2009 have also been completed. The change resulted in an improvement in the completion and publication of audits while the main objective of improving the public procurement process was achieved; in light of this, staffs of the IDA and the IMF support the authorities’ request for a waiver for not having audited all procurement contracts over GNF 100 million. 23. As part of the process of re-engagement with IDA in 2011, the Government decisively strengthened audits of public contracts and broadened coverage. Soon after the presidential elections, the Government froze all public contracts signed in the second half of 2009 and in 2010 (for a total of US$2.2 billion, or 50 percent of GDP) by the military junta, and launched an audit with the help of auditors from the French Supreme External Audit Institution. The last audit, covering the first half of 2011, was completed by the Government’s General Inspection of Finance (Inspection Generale des Finances) in February 2012 and published in May 2012. All the audit reports have been published in the government’s official gazette.15 These audits identified important weaknesses in past procurement practices and management capacity. Procurement contracts which were signed in 2009–10 in violation of the Public Procurement Code were frozen and are being reviewed by a newly established contract regulatory agency (Commission de Réglement des Marchés Publics), while those for which execution had not begun have been canceled. In this context, a new Procurement Law has been prepared with support from the World Bank, and validated during a national workshop in September 2011. The new law is being further revised for submission to the National Transitional Council for approval in 2012. The freeze or cancellation of numerous large irregularly awarded contracts contributed to reducing fiscal imbalances and to restoring macro- economic stability, while allowing confidence in public financial management capacity, and ultimately, in Government accountability to be rebuilt. 15 Official Gazette of the Republic of Guinea, « Special Edition of the Reports of Quarterly Public Procurement Contracts », May 2012. 13 D. Education Trigger #7: Increase the gross enrollment rate for primary school students from 56 percent in 1999 to 62 percent in 2001 and 71 percent in 2002, of which the gross enrollment rate of girls should be 40 percent in 1999, 51 percent in 2001 and 61 percent in 2002. 24. Staffs consider this trigger to have been met. Significant progress has been made in primary school attendance, including for girls, albeit not as quickly as was envisaged at the decision point. Gross enrollment rates for primary school students and for girls reached 80 and 73 percent, respectively, in 2011. Progress was also achieved with completion rates in primary education, which increased from 32 percent in 2000 to 59 percent in 2011. 25. However, important challenges remain. Between 2006/07 and 2011 the gross enrollment rates at primary level increased only by one percentage point from 79 to 80 percent. The access rate to the first grade of primary school stands at 83 percent (with 77 percent for girls) in 2011 putting Guinea below the sub-regional average; the access rate is particularly low for girls. Access to and the quality of primary education, especially in rural areas, remains low because of a lack of qualified teachers, high direct and indirect costs especially for those from the poorest quintiles as well as insufficient supply of services in the poorest areas, requiring sustained efforts. The World Bank’s Social Safety Net Project (approved by the IDA Board in June 2012) will provide added impetus to the Government’s efforts, especially girls’ education, through its monetary transfer component. 26. The results in primary education are raising demand for other levels of education. Tertiary education in Guinea is facing many challenges, including: (i) a lack of qualified teachers, and a ratio of one teacher for about 100 students, (ii) a lack of minimum equipment, (iii) low penetration of ICT, (iv) mismatch between training (content and quality) and the needs of the labor market and businesses, and (v) an inefficient public private partnership. Hence, post-basic education should become a policy focus in the medium term. Trigger #8: Increase the number of new primary school teachers hired by at least 1,500 a year for each year until the HIPC completion point, from an estimated base of about 15,000 primary school teachers in 2000. 27. Staffs consider this trigger to have been met. Ambitious programs have been implemented in education. Since the decision point, the government has increased the number of qualified primary school teachers by more than 1,500 a year, thus meeting the completion point trigger, and over 12,000 classrooms have been built. These efforts have been made possible through external financing for the most part including programs to expand infrastructure, train teachers, and supply school materials. Although the education sector has one of the largest ministerial budgets (19% of the national budget’s recurrent expenditures or 2.3 percent of GDP spent on education), most of the funding covers personnel salaries. 28. Education has received considerable support from donors, including IDA. Guinea joined the Education for All–Fast Track Initiative (EFA-FTI) in 2003. Through this global education initiative, a $64 million program ($40 million under the supervision of the World Bank and $24 million under UNICEF) is currently being implemented in support of a comprehensive 14 education sector reform strategy for 2009–12. The objectives are to increase access to education, improve its quality, and strengthen the delivery of decentralized education services, especially in disadvantaged rural areas. Reforms in the sector include the provision of incentives for teachers assigned to rural areas, stricter control of the Ministry of Education’s payroll through improved human resource and public expenditure management, provision of resources to schools and de- concentrated areas, and other measures to improve the efficiency and quality of education programs. The policies towards teacher recruitment have now shifted from an emphasis on quantity (i.e. number of teachers to be recruited as defined by HIPC) towards the promotion of teacher quality and enhanced accountability in their performance. It will also be important at this stage to promote higher domestic spending effort in education overall, and basic education in particular. E. Health Trigger #9: Increase immunization rates for children under one year of age for DTP3 (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis) from 45 percent in 2000, to 50 percent in 2001, and to 55 percent in 2002. 29. Staffs consider this trigger to have been met. Since 2000, with assistance from the World Bank and the World Health Organization, the Guinean authorities have been implementing a strategy to lower infant mortality through routine immunization of babies, based heavily on two types of campaigns: (i) a nationwide public awareness campaign regarding the availability of immunization for all children aged 9 months and above; and (ii) campaigns promoting follow-up immunization for young children every three to four years. In 2005, the government adopted a ten-year health sector strategy and prepared a detailed five-year development plan (covering the period 2005–2010). The objective of the Ministry of Health’s Five Year Plan was to improve the health status of the population while reducing inequities with a special focus on the most urgent needs (maternal and child health). Nationwide vaccination campaigns have significantly extended immunization coverage for the population, with DPT3 coverage reaching 88 percent over 2008–11, compared with the completion point target of 55 percent. Nevertheless, these efforts need to be sustained and accelerated over time to avoid a possible reversal in immunization rates as demand for it stagnates. Trigger #10: Improve the percentage of pregnant women benefitting from at least one prenatal consultation from 70 percent in 2000, to 80 percent in 2001, and 85 percent in 2002. 30. Staffs consider this trigger to have been met. The government has made major efforts to improve maternal health and reduce maternal mortality. It has increased the coverage of prenatal visits, raising the percentage of pregnant women who receive at least one prenatal consultation to almost 90 percent in 2011. Besides, in 2011, almost 11,000 women were granted free cesarean treatment in public dispensaries, which were well supplied with necessary equipment and medicines. However, the financial sustainability of these programs (and their expansion to cover the last 10 percent of women not receiving prenatal visits) remains uncertain without adequate financing identified in the budget. With funding support from the EU, the Ministry of Health in 2011 conducted a review of the 10-year development plan (2005–15) in preparation of a new national plan encompassing the Priority Action Health program of newly elected President Alpha Conde. The implementation of the new national plan is being supported 15 by the World Bank, the Global Fund, several United Nations agencies and international and national NGOs. III. UPDATED DEBT RELIEF AND SUSTAINABILITY ANALYSIS A. Revision of Data Reconciliation as of the Decision Point 31. The stock of HIPC-eligible external debt in present value (PV) terms at end-1999 was revised upward from the decision point, following the debt reconciliation exercise. The staffs of IDA and the IMF, together with the Guinean authorities, have reviewed the stock of debt at the end of December 1999 presented in the decision point document against recent creditor information. As a result, the nominal stock as of end-1999 has increased by $44.3 million from $3,375 million to $3,419 million (Figure A1 and Table A2); and the PV of debt after traditional debt relief has been revised upward by $38.4 million, from $1,727 million to $1,766 million. About half of this increase is attributable to revisions in the PV of debt owed to multilateral creditors and the rest to bilateral creditors. ï‚· Multilateral creditors. At end-1999, the nominal stock of debt owed to multilaterals has decreased by $4.2 million to $1,805.8 million, and the PV of debt has increased by $18.8 million to $1,058 million. The PV of debt owed to the African Development Bank (AfDB) Group has increased by $22.1 million, mainly because the discount factors applied were revised.16 In addition, European Union (EU) loans administered by IDA amounting to $2.7 million in nominal terms or $1.5 million in PV terms have been re- classified as bilateral.17 Estimates of the PV of debt owed to the Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) and the OPEC Fund for International Development (OFID)18 have been marginally revised due to revisions in loan terms. ï‚· Paris Club creditors. The PV of debt to Paris Club creditors after traditional debt relief has been revised upward from $482 million to $520 million, mainly due to new information received from some creditors on the nominal stock of debt and loan details. There have been significant increases in the PV of debt to Japan, and to a lesser extent to the United States of America and Norway, and marginal increases for Belgium, Italy, and Spain. Estimates have been revised downward for the PV of debt to France. A small increase is attributable to the fact that EU loans administered by IDA are now treated as loans from Paris Club creditors. ï‚· Other official bilateral creditors. The PV of the stock of debt owed to other official bilateral creditors has decreased from $198.3 million to $180.3 million mainly due to the reclassification of loans. 16 The estimate of the PV of debt owed to the AfDB Group at the Decision Point was based on the discount rate applicable for the SDR, which did not appropriately reflect the currency composition of the loans disbursed by the AfDB Group. HIPC Initiative methodology requires application of currency-specific discount factors. 17 European Union loans administered by IDA were classified as multilateral at the Decision Point. In February 2005, the Commission of the European Union, after consultation with its member states, notified staff that these loans should be reclassified as bilateral to reflect correct ownership status. 18 A fund established by member countries of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). 16 ï‚· Estimates of exports of goods and services used to evaluate HIPC assistance at the decision point have also been revised downward from an annual average of $788 million for 1997–99 to $751 million.19 B. Revision of HIPC Assistance and Status of Creditor Participation 32. As a result of the change in the PV of debt as well as in the export data, the required HIPC assistance in end-1999 PV terms to reduce the PV of debt to exports to 150 percent has been revised upward by $93.7 million from $545.4 million estimated at the decision point to $639.2 million. Correspondingly, the common reduction factor has increased from 31.6 percent to 36.2 percent (Table A4).20 33. At the completion point, Guinea has received financing assurances of participation in the Enhanced HIPC Initiative from creditors accounting for 97.5 percent of the PV of HIPC assistance estimated at the Decision Point (Table A11). Multilateral creditors representing 99.6 percent of the PV of multilateral HIPC assistance and bilateral creditors accounting for 95.4 percent of the PV of bilateral and commercial assistance have provided financing assurances. Several multilateral creditors and all Paris Club creditors have provided interim assistance. Some non-Paris Club creditors have already provided their debt relief through stock-of-debt cancellation. Most multilateral and all Paris Club creditors have confirmed their participation. The authorities are working toward reaching agreements with all remaining creditors. Multilateral creditors 34. All but one of the multilateral creditors have committed to provide their full share of assistance to Guinea under the Enhanced HIPC Initiative.21 The revised assistance from multilateral creditors amounts to $383 million in end-1999 PV terms, constituting 60 percent of total HIPC assistance. IDA, the IMF, the AfDB Group, the European Investment Bank (EIB), and the EU provided interim assistance in the form of debt service reduction; the Arab Bank for Economic Development in Africa (BADEA), the IsDB and OFID offered debt rescheduling and refinancing at more concessional terms during the interim period. Total relief provided during the interim period amounts to $138.6 million in end-1999 PV terms, corresponding to 36 percent of total HIPC assistance from multilateral creditors. 35. IDA. Debt relief from IDA amounts to $173.6 million in PV terms at the Decision Point. Of this amount, IDA has provided $75.8 million in end-1999 PV terms as interim relief in the form of a reduction of debt service. IDA suspended the delivery of interim relief in May 2008, after the 50 percent ceiling was reached, equivalent to annual average debt-service savings of 19 Data revisions were reported to the Board as background information to the 2002, 2003, and 2004 Article IV Consultations (SM/02/213, SM/03/231, and SM/04/273). 20 In accordance with the “Information Reporting in the Context of HIPC Initiative Assistanceâ€?, approved by the members of the Executive Board of the IMF (EBS/02/36) and IDA (IDA/SecM2002-0131), March 4, 2002, Guinea qualifies for an upward revision of assistance. 21 The Bank for Investment and Development (EBID) of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), representing 0.4 percent of the total PV of multilateral debt, has not confirmed its participation. 17 $11.8 million from 2001–08.22 In 2011, IDA cleared SDR 49 million in arrears.23 At the completion point, IDA is assumed to provide the remaining amount of relief through a 68.5 percent reduction of Guinea’s debt service to IDA through December 2020, equivalent to annual average debt-service savings of $25.9 million from October 2012–December 2020 (Table A9). 36. The IMF. Enhanced HIPC assistance from the IMF amounts to SDR 27.8 million ($36 million) in PV terms at the decision point. Of this amount, an estimated SDR 11.3 million in PV terms ($14.6 million) had been disbursed between December 2000 and July 2012 in the form of interim assistance.24 At the completion point, the IMF will provide the remaining HIPC assistance through a stock-of-debt operation amounting to SDR 16.5 million ($21.4 million), together with accrued interest currently estimated at SDR 7.5 million. As a result, Guinea’s principal debt service payments to the IMF will restart in 2018 (Table A10). 37. The African Development Bank Group. HIPC debt relief from the AfDB Group amounts to US$94.4 million in PV terms, of which US$37.6 million in end-1999 PV terms (US$43.1 million in nominal terms) has already been provided as interim relief.25 At the Completion Point, it is assumed that the AfDB Group will provide the remaining amount of relief through a 100 percent reduction of debt service on debt outstanding as of end-December 1999, applied from October 2012 through September 2028 (Table A11). 38. The EU and the EIB. HIPC debt relief from the EU and the EIB amounts to $36.3 million of which $4.3 million is from the EIB and $32 million from the EU. The EU has already provided $12.0 million in end-1999 PV terms as interim relief. The EU has also cleared arrears on selected loans through a budget support operation in 2011 after cooperation was resumed after a suspension, and it has frozen arrears on other loans, which will be cleared at the completion point.26 The EIB has delivered $1.5 million in end-1999 PV terms by paying installments on two EU loans in 2002. At the completion point, it is assumed that the EU and the EIB will provide the rest of debt relief by cancelling 100 percent of debt service on selected loans. 22 In January 2008, IDA Management approved the increase of interim relief to Guinea from 33 to 50 percent of IDA’ NPV of relief committed under the HIPC Initiative (see “Revised Schedule of IDA'S HIPC Debt Relief to Guineaâ€?, IDA/SecM2007-0712, December 26, 2007). In exceptional cases, the Executive Directors have authorized Management to increase the limit on interim relief up to a maximum of 50 percent of the NPV of total debt relief, subject to satisfactory progress in policy performance and the likely benefits of extending interim debt relief. See "Enhanced HIPC Initiative: Proposals Concerning Sunset Clause and Provision of Interim Relief," IDNR2004-0234, September 15, 2004. So far, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau and Haiti have benefited from the increase in the interim debt relief ceiling. 23 IDA provided a develop policy grant in April 2011 to clear arrears, which means it will not count towards its HIPC contribution (Guinea - Reengagement and Reform Support Grant, IDA/R2011-0096/2). 24 See footnote 2. 25 In August 2008, the Board of Directors of the AfDB and the AfDF approved the increase of interim relief to Guinea from the limit of 40 percent to 50 percent, which implied the delivery of additional US$10.8 million in debt service reduction from April to December 2008. The additional debt relief was 80 percent financed through a contribution from the HIPC Trust Fund and 20 percent from the AfDB Group’s own resources. 26 The EU will use European Development Fund (EDF) resources for this arrears clearance, and it has confirmed that it will not count it towards its HIPC debt relief allocation. This means that the remaining delivery of HIPC relief will fully benefit the remaining outstanding loans to the EU. 18 39. Assistance from other multilaterals. HIPC debt relief amounts to $10.4 million from BADEA, $18.7 million from the IsDB, and $4.1 million from OFID in end-1999 PV terms. During 2004–11, BADEA and the IsDB rescheduled accrued arrears and maturities twice, and OFID refinanced accrued arrears through a concessional loan. The PV of HIPC relief in end-1999 terms delivered through these agreements is estimated to amount to $2.0 million from BADEA, $3.9 million from the IsDB, and $3.0 million from OFID.27 HIPC debt relief from International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) amounts to $8 million. It is assumed that, at the completion point, IFAD will provide the full amount of debt relief by cancelling 100 percent of debt service falling due through 2017. Bilateral creditors 40. Paris Club creditors28 have agreed in principle to provide their share of enhanced HIPC assistance ($188.1 million in end-1999 PV terms) in accordance with the revised HIPC assistance (Tables A2 and A4). Interim assistance has been provided through three flow treatments on Cologne terms, agreed on May 15, 2001; January 23, 2008; and April 11, 2012. Paris Club creditors declared their readiness in principle to provide their full share of assistance at the completion point through a stock-of-debt reduction. A number of Paris Club creditors have also indicated their willingness to provide additional debt relief, which is estimated at about $482 million in end-2011 PV terms. 41. Non-Paris Club bilateral creditors are assumed to provide relief on HIPC-eligible debt on terms comparable to those of the Paris Club. The PV of such relief in end-1999 terms is estimated at $65.3 million. The major non-Paris Club creditor is Saudi Arabia, comprising 3.4 percent of HIPC-eligible debt, followed by Kuwait (2.8 percent), and China (1.5 percent). In 2009, the Guinean authorities reached agreements with Saudi Arabia and the Kuwait Fund, respectively, to reschedule outstanding claims as of September 2009 which represent full delivery of their respective share of HIPC relief. China has cancelled 100 percent of its outstanding claims due before December 31, 2005, representing more than China’s expected debt relief as estimated at the Decision Point. Egypt cancelled all its outstanding claims as of 2008. Romania agreed in 2005 to provide debt relief that exceeds its proportionate share of assistance.29 42. Negotiations with commercial creditors are ongoing. The Guinean authorities have sent letters to their commercial creditors to request a rescheduling of the existing debt on Paris Club terms. Although agreements have not yet been reached with the commercial creditors, the authorities continue making “good faithâ€? efforts to negotiate comparable treatment of this debt. 27 In 2004 and 2008, BADEA rescheduled accrued arrears falling due in 2005 and 2006 and in 2008, respectively. In 2005 the IsDB rescheduled accrued arrears and payments falling due through December 2006, while it provided a three-year moratorium on payments on selected loans during 2008–10. In 2002, OFID disbursed a concessional loan to refinance $9.0 million of existing loans. 28 Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Norway, Russia, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. 29 In 2007, Libya signed an agreement with Guinea on debt rescheduling, however the agreement is deemed ineffective as Guinea has not made debt service payments in accordance with the agreement, Morocco has agreed to provide debt relief through cancelling their end-1999 claims, however, the Guinean authorities are still trying to obtain a written agreement. North Korea and Iraq agreed in principle to negotiate, however no progress has been made so far. 19 C. Considerations for Exceptional Topping-Up Assistance 43. The debt relief analysis (DRA) has been updated jointly by the authorities and the IMF and IDA staffs on the basis of loan-by-loan debt data, exchange rates and discount rates as of end-2011 (Table A3). At end-2011, the nominal stock of Guinea’s external debt amounted to $3,193.6 million. Multilateral creditors accounted for $1,965.9 million or 61.6 percent of the total debt, of which IDA, the IMF and the AfDB group accounted for 36.5, 1.3 and 12.3 percent, respectively. Paris club creditors accounted for 25.5 percent of total outstanding nominal debt at end-2011, of which the main creditor remained France. Non-Paris club bilateral creditors accounted for 10.3 percent of total debt, of which main creditors were Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Commercial creditors accounted for the remaining 2.7 percent of total debt. 44. Guinea does not qualify for topping-up. The PV of debt-to-exports ratio at end-2011— after full delivery of the HIPC assistance committed at the Decision Point—is now estimated at 132.7 percent, and would decline further to 98.2 percent after full delivery of additional bilateral debt relief beyond the HIPC Initiative (Table A7). This is below the HIPC threshold of 150 percent, although the debt-to-exports ratio after full delivery of HIPC assistance exceeds the end- 2011 projection at the Decision Point of 93.8 percent by 38.9 percentage points (Table 3). The increase of the ratio is mainly due to the changes in parameters (accounting for 32.4 percentage points), especially lower discount rates compared to end-1999.30 Lower-than-expected exports account for 24.0 percentage points. This increase was partially offset by lower-than-expected new borrowing amounting to 29.2 percentage points, while the lower-than-expected concessionality added 14.7 percentage points. 30 Table A1 contains the currency-specific discount rates and exchange rates as of end-1999 and end-2011. 20 Table 2. Factors Affecting PV of Debt-to-Exports Ratio at End-December, 20111 Percentage Percent of total points increase PV of debt-to-exports ratio (as projected at Decision Point) 93.8 PV of debt-to-exports ratio (actual) 132.7 Total increase 38.9 100 1. Due to changes in the parameters 32.4 83 o/w due to changes in the discount rates 22.0 57 o/w due to changes in the exchange rates 10.4 27 2. Due to unanticipated new borrowing -14.6 -37 o/w due to higher than expected disbursements -29.2 -75 o/w due to lower concessionality of the loans 14.7 38 3. Due to changes in exports 24.3 63 4. Due to changes in HIPC relief -5.3 -14 5. Other factors2 2.0 # 5 PV of debt-to-exports ratio (actual) 132.7 Bilateral debt relief beyond HIPC 34.5 PV of debt-to-exports ratio after full delivery of HIPC assistance and 98.2 bilateral debt relief beyond HIPC (actual) Sources : World Bank and IMF s taff es tim ates and projections . 1 PV of debt-to-exports ratio after full delivery of enhanced HIPC as s is tance. 2 Due to revis ions in the end-1999 databas e and changes in the tim ing and m echanis m s of delivery of as s is tance com pared to the as s um ptions in the decis ion point projections (m ainly due to delays in reaching the com pletion point). D. Creditor Participation in the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative 45. Contingent upon agreement by the IMF and IDA Executive Directors that Guinea has reached the completion point under the HIPC Initiative, Guinea would qualify for additional debt relief from the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI) from IDA and the AfDF.31 No MDRI-eligible debt remains due to the IMF at the completion point. MDRI debt relief (net of HIPC assistance) would save Guinea US$964 million in debt service over a period of 40 years on debt owed to these two institutions. 46. Debt relief from IDA. IDA would provide MDRI debt relief through a debt stock cancellation of debt disbursed before December 31, 2003, and still outstanding on September 30, 2012 after the application of full HIPC assistance.32 This would reduce what Guinea owes to IDA by $761.2 million (Table A9). MDRI debt cancellation from IDA would save Guinea average annual debt service (net of HIPC assistance) of $27 million between 2012 and 2041. Total debt service savings from MDRI would amount to $817 million (SDR 505.5 million). 47. Debt relief from the AfDF. The AfDF will provide MDRI debt relief by cancelling loans disbursed before 2005 and still outstanding at the completion point. This will yield annual 31 For IDA, eligible debt covers debt disbursed and outstanding as of December 31, 2003. For the AfDF, eligible debt covers debt disbursed and outstanding as of December 31, 2004. 32 See “IDA's implementation of the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiativeâ€?, IDA/R2006-0042/2 (March 14, 2006). 21 debt service savings (net of HIPC assistance) averaging $3.3 million for 2012–52. Total MDRI debt service savings would amount to $147 million in nominal terms, to be delivered in full at the time of the completion point. 48. Debt relief from the IMF. There will be no MDRI relief from the IMF, as the last loan outstanding at end-2004, was fully repaid by July 2012. The presently outstanding ECF loans were disbursed after end-2004, and will therefore not be eligible for MDRI relief (Table A10). E. Debt Sustainability Outlook After HIPC and MDRI Assistance, 2011–31 49. The debt sustainability outlook after HIPC and MDRI assistance is based on medium- and long-term macroeconomic assumptions that rely heavily on a large mining project expected to start production from 2015 and on a continuation of strong macroeconomic policies started recently. The projections are consistent with the medium-term macroeconomic framework under the ECF arrangement; the key assumptions are summarized in Box 2. 50. After full delivery at the completion point of HIPC Initiative assistance, and additional bilateral assistance beyond HIPC and MDRI, Guinea’s external public debt would be considerably reduced, and external debt indicators would improve (Table A7 and Figure A2). The PV of debt-to-exports ratio would fall from 186 percent at end-2011 to 48.9 percent at end-2012 thanks to full delivery of Enhanced HIPC, MDRI and bilateral beyond- HIPC assistance (Table A7, scenario VI); thereafter, it is projected to fall further to 17.7 percent at end-2031, mainly attributable to an increase in exports following the start of production of a mining project in 2015. The PV of debt-to-GDP ratio would decline from 50.3 percent at end- 2011 to an average of 11.8 percent in 2012–21 and 11.1 percent in 2022–31. The PV of debt-to- revenue ratio would decline from 299.4 percent at end-2011 to an average of 60.1 percent in 2012–21 and decrease to an average of 52.2 percent in 2022–31. 51. Guinea’s debt service ratios are projected to improve as well (Table A5 and Figure A2). The debt service-to-exports ratio—after HIPC Initiative assistance and additional assistance beyond HIPC and MDRI—would decrease from 8.4 percent in 2012 to 1.6 percent in 2013–14 (Table A7, scenario VI). Thereafter it would fall until 2021 to 0.7 percent mainly thanks to the mining projects. From 2021 onwards, it would gradually rise to around 1.7 percent in 2031 mainly due to new borrowing. The debt service to revenue ratio is projected to fall from 11.6 percent in 2012 to an average of about 3.0 percent in 2012–31. 22 Box 2. Macroeconomic Assumptions for 2011–32 Medium- and long-term macroeconomic assumptions rely heavily on a large mining project expected to start production in 2015 and on a continuation of strong macroeconomic policies. Real GDP growth: Output growth averaged 3 percent during the first half of the 2000s, plunged in 2009–10 as a result of the political crisis, but rebounded to about 4 percent in 2011 as the political and economic situation started to stabilize. Growth is projected to increase to 5 percent on average during 2012– 14, reflecting the start-up of construction-phase activities in the mining sector and strong growth in agriculture following government support. It would jump to 18 percent on average during 2015–18, as production from a major mining project begins and ramps up. Once mining production reaches full capacity, growth tails off and is projected at an average of 3 percent per year after 2020. Non-mining sector growth is projected to stabilize around 5 percent per year in the long run.  The reform programs and actions currently undertaken would unlock growth potentials, including support to the agriculture sector; improvement of electricity supply; improvement of the business environment; and integration of the mining activities to the local economy. Inflation: Inflation has gradually declined from 21 percent in December 2010 to 15 percent in June 2012. In the long run, as measured by the GDP deflator in U.S. dollar terms, inflation is projected to be around 3 percent, close to CPI inflation projections in Guinea and in neighboring countries. Fiscal policy: Following a large deterioration in the fiscal base balance in 2009–10, reaching 13 percent of GDP in 2010, a sharp policy-induced correction reduced it to 1.6 percent in 2011. The deficit is projected to increase to 3.6 percent of GDP in 2012 due to large investment projects financed with exceptional mining revenue. The deficit would gradually decline and turn into a surplus of about 1 percent of GDP from 2016 as government revenue is expected to be boosted by a large mining project from the middle of the decade. Investment expenditure is projected to expand from 6 percent of GDP in 2000–11, to 12 percent in 2012, and 18 percent in the long run. Current expenditure would average 13 percent of GDP excluding the large mining production during the projection period. External current account balance (excluding official transfers): The current account deficit is expected to expand sharply to 40 percent of GDP on average during 2012–14, as imports for the mega mining project ramp up during its construction phase. Subsequently, the current account is projected to gradually move to equilibrium as mining sector investment (imports) declines and mining exports come on stream. The government has also provided strong support to the agricultural sector, which has already led to lower food imports. The international reserve position was boosted (from less than one month of imports at end-2010 to above 4 months in June 2012) by exceptional mining revenue; reserves will gradually decline in the medium term until the large iron ore project starts production. External financing: After the suspension of virtually all official financing in 2009–10, loan and grant disbursements resumed in 2011 and are projected to reach 5 percent of GDP in 2012, of which half takes the form of grants. Although a scaling up is not foreseen, official financing (grants and loans) is expected to continue at a relatively high level in the medium term, hovering around 5 percent of GDP per year until 2015, but would gradually decline thereafter as domestic revenue from the mining sector would ramp up and finance public investment projects. Over time, the share of concessional loans is expected to decline, from 60 percent during 2011–17, to 40 percent during 2018–25 and 30 percent during 2026–32. Foreign direct investment: Net FDI is expected to surge temporarily to above 30 percent of GDP per year on average during 2012–15, owing to the rapid buildup in mining related activities. Subsequently net FDI falls and over the long run shifts between small net inflows and outflows. At the same time, net outflows on the income account increase, as the repatriation and distribution of profits from the mining sector rises. 23 F. Sensitivity Analysis and Long-Term Debt Sustainability 52. This section analyzes the impact on debt dynamics of three alternative scenarios: permanently lower GDP growth; permanently lower export growth; and lower average concessionality for new external borrowing (Table A8 and Figure A3). The assumptions for the alternative scenarios are chosen to illustrate independently the effects of domestic and external shocks. In the case of Guinea, given the nexus between projected growth, mining activity and exports, mining sector related foreign direct investment, the shocks could also occur in combination, resulting in an aggravated negative impact on debt burden indicators. The baseline and all three scenarios assume full delivery of HIPC debt relief, MDRI and bilateral beyond HIPC assistance. Alternative Scenario 1: Permanently Lower GDP Growth 53. This scenario assumes that real GDP growth is reduced by 2.5 percentage points compared to projections in the baseline. This reduction in growth rates could be linked to political instability (as was the case in 2008) or a halt in important structural reforms. The lower growth would consequently reduce government revenue while exports remain unaffected. Under this scenario, the PV of debt-to-exports ratio would be unchanged at 17.7 percent in 2031 as under the baseline scenario. The PV of debt -to-revenue ratio would reach 43.2 percent in 2031, compared to 35 percent under the baseline. The PV of debt-to-GDP ratio would be 12.9 percent as compared to the baseline of 8.4 percent. Alternative Scenario 2: Permanently Lower Exports Growth 54. In this scenario, exports are assumed to grow at lower pace than the baseline due to lower-than-expected production from the mining project. GDP and revenue are also adjusted downward compared to the baseline. Based on these assumptions, the PV of debt-to-export ratio would deteriorate to 35.2 percent in 2031 compared to the baseline of 17.7 percent. The debt service-to-export ratio would also be higher than under the baseline at 3.3 percent compared to 1.7 percent. The PV of debt-to-revenue would be 35.9 percent as compared to 35.0 percent in the baseline in 2031. Alternative Scenario 3: Lower Average Concessionality of New Borrowing 55. This scenario assumes a lower concessionality of new external financing, specifically a shift from concessional multilateral to nonconcessional bilateral and commercial borrowing causing the average grant element to drop by about 18 percentage points. In this scenario, average concessionality of new borrowing from 2012 to 2031 would fall from 33.0 percent under the baseline to 15.2 percent.33The average PV of debt-to-exports would increase from 32.3 percent in the baseline to 34.3 percent in 2012–2021. The average debt service-to-exports ratio during this period would be 2.3 percent as compared to 1.8 percent in the baseline. 56. Guinea’s future external debt position will be affected by the modalities of the government’s participation in large-scale infrastructure and mining projects. In the near- 33 Under the baseline scenario, the share of multilateral creditors in new borrowing would decrease from 60 percent in 2013–17, to 40 percent in 2018–25, and 30 percent in 2026–32. Under the alternative scenario, the figures are, respectively, 20, 10 and 5 percent; remaining borrowing would be nonconcessional. 24 term this issue has been brought to the forefront by the prospective SIMFER mining and infrastructure project. The total cost of the two projects, tentatively estimated at about $17-18 billion (one-third mining and two-thirds for infrastructure), is to be shared in proportion to each shareholder’s equity. The government has options to hold up to 35 percent (15 percent at no cost) in the mining project and up to 51 percent in the infrastructure project. As of now the government has made no decision regarding how much of its possible stake to take up or on the financing of its contribution. It has, however, stated clearly that its participation will not involve direct borrowing or guarantees by the government. Instead it will rely on private-public partnerships through special purpose financing vehicles for which financing costs would be fully covered by project revenues, and involve no contingent liabilities to the government. The participation of the IFC in the SIMFER and possible participation of the World Bank in the infrastructure project should help ensure that the projects are designed to generate large economic and social returns. Given the magnitude of these projects and possible future ones, it will be important that the government strengthen its capacity to develop sound and transparent public private partnerships, ensure that any financing agreement does not include contingent liabilities, and that projections of revenues are well-based and sufficient to cover financing costs of the PPP. This would help to avoid possible implicit contingent liabilities in situations where the collapse of a project could have widespread damaging economic and social impacts. The assumption of any such liability, could lead to sharp deterioration in debt burden indicators, particularly on debt service ratios.34 57. Although the sensitivity analysis illustrates that Guinea’s debt sustainability outlook after debt relief has become more robust to single shocks, it may be vulnerable to the impact of combined shocks. The LIC-DSA (Appendix II) also considers possible vulnerabilities from combined shocks related to the mining sector and underscores the importance of policies to reduce the potential vulnerability of Guinea’s external and fiscal sustainability, including the need to avoid any explicit or implicit contingent liabilities stemming from PPP agreements. IV. CONCLUSIONS 58. In the view of the staffs of IDA and the IMF, Guinea made satisfactory progress with meeting the requirements established in December 2000 for reaching the completion point under the enhanced HIPC Initiative. Nine of the ten triggers have been met. Notwithstanding capacity limitations, good progress was made in achieving the objectives of the remaining trigger, for which the authorities have requested a waiver. During the decade following the Decision Point, performance regarding the implementation of the PRSP was unsteady and PRGF-supported programs were interrupted. However, since the first democratically elected government took office in early 2011, policy implementation has considerably improved. The PRSP has been satisfactorily implemented in 2011. Macroeconomic stability has been restored and maintained, as evidenced by the satisfactory track record under the SMP in 2011 and the ECF-supported program during the first half of 2012; quantitative targets and criteria have been met and there was good progress with structural reform. Satisfactory progress was made in the health and education sectors and on 34 See also the discussion of such risks in Supplement of IMF Country Report No. 12/63, March 2012, on LIC-DSA which can be found at: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2012/cr1263.pdf. 25 other poverty reducing measures. With regard to the Governance criteria, Guinea met the trigger on the publication of a one-year progress report of the Anti-corruption Committee. Audit reports on public procurement contracts were prepared and published, although, for practical reasons and to improve the speed of completion of the reports, the audits were limited to a sample, starting in 2008. Given the resulting improvements in completing and publishing reports following this change, the staffs of the IDA and the IMF support the authorities request for a waiver regarding this trigger. 59. The debt reconciliation exercise resulted in an upward revision of the HIPC- eligible external debt in present value (PV) terms at end-1999. The common reduction factor increased from 31.6 percent to 36.2 percent; and the amount of HIPC debt relief required to reduce the PV of debt to 150 percent of exports on the basis of end-December 1999 data has been revised upward from $545 million estimated at the Decision Point to $639 million. Assurances have been received regarding participation in the enhanced HIPC Initiative from creditors representing 97.5 percent of the PV of HIPC debt relief estimated at the Decision Point. 60. The IDA and IMF staffs are of the view that Guinea does not qualify for topping- up under the HIPC Initiative. After full delivery of HIPC assistance committed at the Decision Point and additional bilateral debt relief beyond the HIPC Initiative, the PV of debt-to- exports ratio at end-2011 would decline to 98 percent, well below the HIPC threshold of 150 percent. 61. Full delivery of HIPC debt relief, additional bilateral assistance beyond HIPC, and MDRI, would considerably reduce Guinea’s external public debt. Its risk of debt distress according to the Low-Income Country Debt Sustainability Analysis (LIC-DSA) will become moderate, after having been assessed as “in debt distressâ€? in 2007 and at “high risk of debt distressâ€? in February 2012 (Appendix II). However, the recurrence of external shocks and/or policy slippages as in the past and the resumption of nonconcessional borrowing could lead to the reemergence of unsustainable debt. Improvement in the quality of debt management, strengthened capacity to evaluate potential government liabilities of PPP agreements, sound macroeconomic policies, and improvement s in the business environment will be crucial to achieving and maintaining a sustainable debt level. 62. In light of the above, the staffs of IDA and IMF recommend that the Executive Directors determine that Guinea has reached the completion point under the Enhanced HIPC Initiative. V. ISSUES FOR DISCUSSIONS 63. The Executive Directors may wish to consider the following questions: ï‚· Completion point. Do Directors agree that Guinea has reached the completion point under the Enhanced HIPC Initiative? ï‚· Data Revision. Do Directors agree with staffs’ recommendation that the revised export data and the updated stock of debt in end-1999 PV terms warrant a revision in the 26 proposed amount of HIPC assistance, from $545.4 million to $639.2 million in end-1999 PV terms? ï‚· HIPC assistance from the IMF. Do IMF Directors agree that Guinea qualifies for an amount of debt relief from the IMF equal to SDR 16.5 million, together with accrued interest, currently estimated at SDR 7.5 million, which would be financed from Guinea's HIPC Umbrella sub-account? ï‚· Topping-up. Do the Directors agree that Guinea has not met the requirements for exceptional topping-up at the completion point? ï‚· Creditor Participation. Do Directors agree that Guinea’s creditors have given sufficient assurances to irrevocably commit HIPC Initiative assistance to Guinea? 27 Figure A1. Guinea: Composition of External Debt by Creditor Groups, End-1999 and End-2011 (in percent of total) 28 Figure A2. Guinea: External Debt and Debt Service Indicators for Medium- and Long-Term Public Sector Debt, 2011–31 PV of External Debt to Exports (%) 225 Before  traditional  debtâ€?relief mechanisms After  conditional delivery of  enhanced HIPC  assistance 200 After  conditional delivery of  enhanced HIPC  and MDRI  assistance After  conditional delivery of  enhanced HIPC,  MDRI  and beyond HIPC  assistance 175 150 125 100 75 50 25 0 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 2031 External Debt Service to  Exports (%) 16 Before  traditional  debtâ€?relief mechanisms 14 After  delivery of enhanced HIPC  assistance After  delivery of enhanced HIPC  and MDRI  assistance 12 After  delivery of enhanced HIPC,  MDRI  and  beyond HIPC  assistance 10 8 6 4 2 0 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 Sources: Guinean authorities, and World Bank and IMF staf f estimates and projections. Conditional delivery means that the PV of debt at end-2011 only assumes delivery of interim HIPC relief in 2012 until the completion point without any HIPC debt relief af ter the completion point, whereas the PV of debt f rom 2012 onwards assumes f ull delivery of HIPC relief . 29 Figure A3. Guinea: Sensitivity of Long-Term Debt Sustainability after Shocks, 2011–31 (After full delivery of HIPC, MDRI and beyond HIPC relief) PV of External Debt to Exports (%) 200 I. Baseline  scenario 175 II. Permanently  lower  GDP  growth III. Permanently  lower  exports growth 150 IV. Lower  average  concessionality on new  borrowing 125 100 75 50 25 0 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 2031 External Debt Service to  Exports (%) 9 I. Baseline  scenario 8 II. Permanently  lower  GDP  growth 7 III. Permanently  lower  exports growth IV. Lower  average  concessionality on new  borrowing 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 Sources: Guinean authorities, and World Bank and IMF staf f estimates and projections. 30 Table A1. Guinea: Comparison of Discount Rate and Exchange Rate Assumptions Discount Rates 1 Exchange Rates 2 (in percent per annum) (currency per U.S. dollar) At decision point At completion point At decision point At completion point End-Dec. 1999 End-Dec. 2011 End-Dec. 1999 End-Dec. 2011 Currency Unit of Account (ISDB, AfDF/AfDB)3 5.59 3.09 0.73 0.65 Canadian Dollar 6.67 3.23 1.44 1.02 CFA Franc 4 5.47 3.52 652.95 506.96 Swiss Franc 4.27 2.05 1.60 0.94 Chinese Yuan3 5.59 3.09 8.28 6.30 Danish Kroner 5.32 3.21 7.40 5.75 Euro 5.47 3.52 1.00 0.77 Great Britain Sterling 6.70 3.37 0.62 0.65 Japanese Yen 1.98 1.63 102.20 77.72 Kuwaiti Dinar3 5.59 3.09 0.30 0.28 Libyan Dinar3 5.59 3.09 0.46 1.26 Norwegian Kroner 6.64 3.33 8.04 5.99 Saudi Arabia Riyal3 5.59 3.09 3.75 3.75 Special Drawing Rights 5.59 3.09 0.73 0.65 Swedish Kroner 5.80 3.27 8.53 6.89 Russian Rouble5 7.04 2.96 0.60 0.60 United States Dollar 7.04 2.96 1.00 1.00 Sources: OECD; IMF, International Financial Statistics. 1 The discount rates used are the average commercial interest reference rates (CIRRs) for the respective currencies over the six-month period ending in December 2011 for the completion point and in December 1999 for the decision point. 2 End-of-period exchange rates. 3 Apply the discount rate for SDR. 4 Apply the discount rate for EUR. 5 Former Soviet Union Ruble. Apply the discount rate for USD. 31 Table A2. Guinea: Revised Nominal Stocks and Net Present Value of Debt at Decision Point by Creditor Groups as of end-1999 Nominal Debt Stock at End-1999 PV of Debt Before Rescheduling2 PV of Debt After Rescheduling2 At Decision Point Revised At At Decision Point Revised At At Decision Point Revised At Completion Point Completion Point Completion Point US$ Percent US$ Percent US$ Percent US$ Percent US$ Percent US$ Percent million of total million of total million of total million of total million of total million of total Total 3,374.8 100 3,419.1 100 2,414.8 100 2,478.2 100 1,727.2 100 1,765.6 100 Multilateral institutions 1,810.0 53.6 1,805.8 52.8 1,039.2 43.0 1,058.0 42.7 1,039.2 60.2 1,058.0 59.9 African Development Bank 117.2 3.5 116.4 3.4 129.0 5.3 130.7 5.3 129.0 7.5 130.7 7.4 African Development Fund 248.8 7.4 248.6 7.3 109.6 4.5 130.0 5.2 109.6 6.3 130.0 7.4 BADEA 34.3 1.0 34.3 1.0 28.7 1.2 28.6 1.2 28.7 1.7 28.6 1.6 ECOWAS Bank for Investment and Development 4.5 0.1 4.5 0.1 4.6 0.2 4.6 0.2 4.6 0.3 4.6 0.3 European Investment Bank 12.6 0.4 12.6 0.4 12.1 0.5 11.8 0.5 12.1 0.7 11.8 0.7 European Union (administered by EIB) 128.4 3.8 128.4 3.8 88.3 3.7 88.3 3.6 88.3 5.1 88.3 5.0 European Union (administered by IDA)3 2.7 … … … 1.5 … … … 1.5 … … … World Bank (IDA) 1,012.8 30.0 1,012.8 29.6 479.5 19.9 479.5 19.3 479.5 27.8 479.5 27.2 IFAD 44.4 1.3 44.4 1.3 22.1 0.9 22.1 0.9 22.1 1.3 22.1 1.3 IMF 127.2 3.8 127.2 3.7 99.5 4.1 99.5 4.0 99.5 5.8 99.5 5.6 Islamic Development Bank 63.7 1.9 63.5 1.9 52.8 2.2 51.6 2.1 52.8 3.1 51.6 2.9 OPEC Fund for International Development 13.4 0.4 13.1 0.4 11.6 0.5 11.3 0.5 11.6 0.7 11.3 0.6 Official bilateral and commercial 1,564.8 46.4 1,613.3 47.2 1,375.6 57 1,420.2 57.3 688.0 40 707.6 40.1 Paris Club 1,177.9 34.9 1,215.5 35.6 1,036.8 43 1,072.3 43.3 482.1 28 519.7 29.4 Post-cutoff date 272.8 8.1 326.6 9.6 220.1 9 268.8 10.8 220.1 13 268.8 15.2 Pre-cutoff date, of which: 905.1 26.8 888.9 26.0 816.7 34 803.5 32.4 262.0 15 250.9 14.2 ODA 152.8 4.5 140.4 4.1 108.9 5 97.4 3.9 84.4 5 74.4 4.2 Non-ODA 752.4 22.3 748.5 21.9 707.8 29 706.1 28.5 177.6 10 176.5 10.0 Of which: Austria 12.6 0.4 12.9 0.4 7.6 0 8.0 0.3 4.5 0 4.4 0.2 Belgium 9.1 0.3 11.9 0.3 6.6 0 8.1 0.3 3.2 0 4.4 0.2 Brazil 11.3 0.3 11.3 0.3 5.8 0 3.9 0.2 3.9 0 3.7 0.2 France 345.4 10.2 327.0 9.6 291.7 12 282.1 11.4 254.0 15 244.8 13.9 Germany 3.9 0.1 3.8 0.1 4.4 0 4.3 0.2 2.4 0 2.3 0.1 Italy 48.9 1.4 53.9 1.6 38.7 2 43.1 1.7 23.7 1 24.9 1.4 Japan 81.8 2.4 119.2 3.5 75.0 3 104.1 4.2 58.0 3 91.7 5.2 Norway 12.5 0.4 18.3 0.5 11.6 0 17.0 0.7 6.7 0 10.5 0.6 Russia 498.0 14.8 498.0 14.6 489.0 20 491.5 19.8 57.3 3 56.8 3.2 Spain 17.4 0.5 17.7 0.5 12.8 1 11.3 0.5 6.5 0 7.5 0.4 United Kingdom 8.4 0.2 7.9 0.2 5.8 0 5.4 0.2 2.9 0 2.7 0.2 United States of America 128.5 3.8 131.0 3.8 87.6 4 92.1 3.7 59.0 3 65.1 3.7 EEC-IDA administered loans 3 … … 2.7 0.1 … … 1.5 0.1 … … 0.7 0.0 Non-Paris Club Official Bilateral 376.9 11.2 387.8 11.3 331.2 14 340.2 13.7 198.3 11 180.3 10.2 Post-cutoff date 158.2 4.7 152.2 4.5 125.4 5 117.2 4.7 131.2 8 116.9 6.6 Pre-cutoff date 218.7 6.5 235.6 6.9 205.8 9 223.0 9.0 67.1 4 63.4 3.6 Of which: ODA 105.6 3.1 107.1 3.1 92.7 4 94.6 3.8 29.4 2 20.9 1.2 Non-ODA 113.2 3.4 128.4 3.8 113.2 5 128.4 5.2 37.7 2 42.4 2.4 Of which: Bulgaria 10.4 0.3 10.4 0.3 10.4 0 10.4 0.4 3.5 0 3.4 0.2 China 97.0 2.9 108.4 3.2 83.2 3 93.1 3.8 25.7 1 27.1 1.5 Egypt 8.6 0.3 8.6 0.3 8.0 0 8.0 0.3 9.5 1 7.9 0.4 Iraq 5.8 0.2 5.8 0.2 5.8 0 5.8 0.2 1.9 0 1.9 0.1 Korea, DPR 1.9 0.1 1.4 0.0 1.9 0 1.2 0.0 0.5 0 0.2 0.0 Kuwait 79.1 2.3 79.1 2.3 66.4 3 66.3 2.7 50.6 3 48.6 2.8 Libya 35.6 1.1 35.6 1.0 35.6 1 35.6 1.4 11.9 1 11.8 0.7 Morocco 24.7 0.7 24.7 0.7 24.7 1 24.7 1.0 8.2 0 8.1 0.5 Romania 15.3 0.5 15.3 0.4 15.3 1 15.3 0.6 15.3 1 5.0 0.3 Saudi Arabia 83.8 2.5 83.8 2.5 65.1 3 65.1 2.6 65.5 4 60.4 3.4 Thailand 1.3 0.0 1.3 0.0 1.3 0 1.3 0.1 1.3 0 1.3 0.1 Yugoslavia 13.5 0.4 13.5 0.4 13.5 1 13.5 0.5 4.5 0 4.5 0.3 Commercial 10.0 0.3 10.0 0.3 7.6 0 7.6 0.3 7.6 0 7.6 0.4 Sources: Guinean authorities, and World Bank and IMF staff estimates. 1 Information based on latest data available at completion point. 2 Stock of debt operation on Naples terms from official bilateral and commercial creditors. 3 EEC loans administered by IDA were reclassified as official bilateral claims in February 2005. 32 Table A3. Guinea: Nominal and Present Value of External Debt outstanding at End- December 2011 (In millions of $, unless otherwise indicated) Legal Situation2 Present Value of Debt 3 Nominal Percent PV of debt Percent After After additional After additional Debt of total of total enhanced bilateral relief bilateral relief HIPC relief (In percent of total debt) Total 3,193.6 100.0 2,704.2 100.0 1,854.8 1,373.0 100.0 Multilateral institutions 1,965.9 61.6 1,551.4 57.4 1,058.8 1,058.8 77.1 African Development Bank Group 392.9 12.3 301.6 11.2 173.6 173.6 12.6 African Development Bank 1.1 0.0 1.2 0.0 1.2 1.2 0.1 African Development Fund 391.8 12.3 300.4 11.1 172.4 172.4 12.6 BADEA 32.6 1.0 32.1 1.2 11.0 11.0 0.8 ECOWAS Bank for Investment and Development 34.0 1.1 33.4 1.2 31.2 31.2 2.3 European Investment Bank 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 European Union (administered by EIB)4 59.4 1.9 49.6 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 World Bank (IDA) 1,165.8 36.5 897.2 33.2 676.1 676.1 49.2 IFAD 82.6 2.6 62.6 2.3 43.2 43.2 3.1 IMF 41.5 1.3 36.6 1.4 5.1 5.1 0.4 Islamic Development Bank 143.4 4.5 126.2 4.7 108.1 108.1 7.9 OPEC Fund for International Development 13.6 0.4 12.0 0.4 10.7 10.7 0.8 Official bilateral and commercial 1,227.7 38.4 1,152.8 42.6 795.9 314.2 22.9 Paris Club5 813.0 25.5 796.9 29.5 513.5 31.8 2.3 Post-cutoff date 303.6 9.5 293.2 10.8 292.9 23.5 1.7 Pre-cutoff date 509.4 16.0 503.7 18.6 220.6 8.3 0.6 ODA 136.1 4.3 133.7 4.9 116.3 0.0 0.0 Non-ODA 373.3 11.7 370.0 13.7 104.4 8.3 0.6 By country: Austria 10.4 0.3 9.6 0.4 … … … Belgium 7.0 0.2 6.5 0.2 … … … Brazil 10.9 0.3 9.6 0.4 … … … Canada 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 … … … EEC-IDA administered loans 2/ 2.2 0.1 1.4 0.1 … … … France 363.8 11.4 357.9 13.2 … … … Germany 4.6 0.1 4.9 0.2 … … … Italy 30.5 1.0 29.8 1.1 … … … Japan 96.0 3.0 94.9 3.5 … … … Norway 18.5 0.6 20.0 0.7 … … … Russia 145.4 4.6 141.8 5.2 … … … Spain 18.3 0.6 16.9 0.6 … … … United Kingdom 5.6 0.2 5.0 0.2 … … … United States of America 99.5 3.1 98.2 3.6 … … … Other official bilateral 329.7 10.3 271.3 10.0 210.2 210.2 15.3 Post-cutoff date 188.5 5.9 149.8 5.5 149.3 149.3 10.9 Pre-cutoff date 141.2 4.4 121.5 4.5 60.9 60.9 4.4 ODA 55.7 1.7 35.9 1.3 34.9 34.9 2.5 Non-ODA 85.6 2.7 85.6 3.2 26.0 26.0 1.9 By country: Bulgaria 10.8 0.3 10.8 0.4 2.7 2.7 0.2 China 54.0 1.7 39.2 1.5 39.2 39.2 2.9 Congo, Rep. of 50.0 42.6 42.6 42.6 3.1 Egypt 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Iraq 6.1 0.2 6.1 0.2 1.5 1.5 0.1 Korea, DPR 1.9 0.1 1.9 0.1 0.9 0.9 0.1 Kuwait 74.4 2.3 53.8 2.0 53.7 53.7 3.9 Libya 42.4 1.3 42.4 1.6 14.9 14.9 1.1 Morocco 24.7 0.8 24.7 0.9 5.4 5.4 0.4 Romania 1.4 0.0 1.4 0.1 1.3 1.3 0.1 Saudi Arabia 62.4 2.0 46.9 1.7 46.8 46.8 3.4 Serbia 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 Thailand 1.4 0.0 1.4 0.1 0.9 0.9 0.1 Commercial 85.0 2.7 84.6 3.1 72.2 72.2 5.3 Sources: Guinean authorities, and World Bank and IMF staff estimates. 1 Figures are based on data as of end-2011. 2 Includes the 1989 Toronto, 1992 London, 1995 and 1997 Naples flows, as well as the 2001 and 2008 Cologne flows and interim relief from non-Paris Club creditors. 3 Assumes full delivery of HIPC assistance as of end-2011. 4 Arrears to the EU of USD 19.9 million were frozen in May 2011 and will be cleared after Completion Point. This arrears clearance will not be counted toward the HIPC contribution and has therefore been left out of the table and calculations. 5 Paris Club creditors deliver their share of assistance as a group. Actual delivery modalities are defined on a case-by-case basis. 33 Table A4. Guinea: Revised Nominal and Present Value of Debt at Decision Point by Creditor Groups as of end-19991 (In millions of U.S. dollars in end-June 1999 PV terms, unless otherwise indicated)2 3,4 Debt Outstanding Debt Outstanding Reduction of the 5 (PV terms) end-1999 (A) (PV terms) Post-HIPC (B) PV of Debt due to HIPC (A-B) At decision Revised at At decision Revised at At decision Revised at point completion point point completion point point completion point Total 1,727 1,766 1,182 1,126 545 639 (as percent of exports) 219 235 150 150 69 85 of which: Multilateral 1,039 1,058 711 675 328 383 Bilateral and Commercial 688 708 471 451 217 256 Paris Club 482 520 330 332 152 188 Other Official Bilateral 198 180 136 115 63 65 Commercial 8 8 5 5 2 3 Memorandum Items: 3 Common reduction factor (percent) 31.6 36.2 6 3-year exports average (millions of USD) 788 751 Sources: Guinean authorities, and World Bank and IMF staff estimates. 1 Assumes proportional burden-sharing as described in "HIPC Initiative: Estimated Costs and Burden-Sharing Approaches" (EBS/97/127, 7/7/97, and IDA/SEC M97-306, 7/7/97), that is, after full application of traditional debt relief mechanisms. 2 Using six-month backward-looking discount rates at end-December 1999, and end-1999 exchange rates. 3 After a hypothetical stock-of-debt operation on Naples terms at end-1999. 4 Based on the latest data available at the completion point after full application of traditional debt relief mechanisms. 5 Each creditor's PV reduction in percent of its exposure at the Decision Point reference date, end-December 1999. 6 Based on the latest annual data on the three-year average of exports of goods and nonfactor services at the Decision Point (1997–99). 34 Table A5. Guinea: External Debt Service (In millions of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated) Projections Annual Averages 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2021 2026 2031 2012–21 2022-31 I.Before traditional debt-relief mechanisms Total 203.6 176.9 177.0 174.9 165.2 137.4 172.7 186.6 163.8 171.7 Existing debt 202.4 174.0 172.8 169.5 158.5 106.3 97.9 58.7 152.3 89.8 Multilateral 109.2 106.9 106.1 103.5 101.4 88.9 87.1 55.8 100.0 79.5 World Bank 52.4 53.1 53.5 54.3 55.5 57.4 58.6 35.8 55.4 53.1 IMF2 3.9 2.1 7.6 7.6 7.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.0 AfDB Group 14.3 13.5 13.6 13.3 13.2 14.5 15.3 14.2 13.8 15.2 Other multilateral 38.6 38.1 31.4 28.3 25.2 17.0 13.2 5.8 26.7 11.2 Official bilateral 93.2 67.0 66.7 66.1 57.1 17.4 10.8 2.9 52.3 10.3 Paris Club 52.8 53.2 53.3 53.7 45.6 7.4 5.6 0.0 38.6 4.6 Other official bilateral 14.8 13.8 13.3 12.4 11.5 9.9 5.3 2.9 11.1 5.7 Commercial 25.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 New debt 1.2 3.0 4.3 5.4 6.7 31.1 74.8 127.9 11.5 81.9 Debt service-to-exports ratio 13.3 11.0 10.6 8.1 5.2 1.6 1.9 1.9 5.9 1.9 Debt service-to-revenue ratio 18.5 14.1 13.8 11.1 9.0 5.1 4.9 3.8 9.9 4.7 II. After traditional debt-relief mechanisms1 Total 191.0 164.9 166.2 165.1 167.9 174.5 178.7 202.0 170.5 183.2 Existing debt 189.9 161.9 161.9 159.7 161.2 143.4 103.9 74.1 159.0 101.3 Multilateral 109.2 106.9 106.1 103.5 101.4 88.9 87.1 55.8 100.0 79.5 World Bank 52.4 53.1 53.5 54.3 55.5 57.4 58.6 35.8 55.4 53.1 IMF2 3.9 2.1 7.6 7.6 7.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.0 AfDB Group 14.3 13.5 13.6 13.3 13.2 14.5 15.3 14.2 13.8 15.2 Other multilateral 38.6 38.1 31.4 28.3 25.2 17.0 13.2 5.8 26.7 11.2 Official bilateral 80.6 55.0 55.8 56.2 59.8 54.5 16.9 18.3 59.0 21.8 Paris Club 37.3 38.0 39.0 40.1 42.9 36.0 7.9 9.7 39.9 11.5 Other official bilateral 17.5 16.7 16.6 15.9 16.6 18.0 8.9 8.6 16.3 10.3 Commercial 25.8 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.1 New debt 1.2 3.0 4.3 5.4 6.7 31.1 74.8 127.9 11.5 81.9 Debt service-to-exports ratio 12.5 10.2 10.0 7.6 5.3 2.1 2.0 2.1 5.8 2.0 Debt service-to-revenue ratio 17.4 13.1 13.0 10.5 9.2 6.5 5.1 4.1 10.0 5.0 III. After enhanced HIPC assistance Total 151.0 104.9 98.8 113.7 111.2 131.0 174.0 205.4 119.9 177.8 Existing debt 149.9 101.9 94.5 108.3 104.5 99.9 99.3 77.5 108.4 95.9 Multilateral 86.4 28.4 29.0 31.9 32.5 70.6 78.7 61.3 42.9 74.5 World Bank 41.9 22.8 23.1 23.6 24.3 57.4 58.6 35.8 29.5 53.1 IMF2 2.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 AfDB Group 14.0 3.2 3.4 3.3 3.3 4.2 5.4 14.2 4.6 8.3 Other multilateral 28.5 2.5 2.5 4.9 4.8 9.0 14.8 11.3 8.3 13.0 Official bilateral 63.5 73.5 65.5 76.4 72.0 29.3 20.5 16.2 65.5 21.4 Paris Club 31.9 60.6 52.7 64.1 59.5 13.9 8.6 4.8 50.4 8.8 Other official bilateral 6.2 12.3 12.2 11.6 11.8 14.5 10.5 9.2 11.9 11.1 Commercial 25.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.9 1.4 2.3 3.2 1.5 New debt 1.2 3.0 4.3 5.4 6.7 31.1 74.8 127.9 11.5 81.9 Debt service-to-exports ratio 9.9 6.5 5.9 5.3 3.5 1.6 1.9 2.1 4.0 1.9 Debt service-to-revenue ratio 13.7 8.3 7.7 7.2 6.1 4.9 4.9 4.2 7.0 4.8 Reduction in debt service as a result of HIPC Initiative assistance2 40.0 60.0 67.4 51.4 56.7 43.5 4.7 -3.4 50.6 5.4 IV. After enhanced HIPC and MDRI assistance Total 145.2 84.7 78.2 92.9 89.8 76.6 120.2 165.3 96.6 126.4 Existing debt 144.0 81.8 74.0 87.5 83.1 45.5 45.4 37.4 85.1 44.5 Multilateral 80.5 8.3 8.5 11.1 11.1 16.3 24.9 21.2 19.6 23.1 World Bank 36.2 3.5 3.6 3.9 4.0 4.5 6.6 6.4 7.2 6.4 IMF2 2.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 AfDB Group 13.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.8 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.6 Other multilateral 28.5 2.5 2.5 4.9 4.8 9.0 14.8 11.3 8.3 13.0 Official bilateral 63.5 73.5 65.5 76.4 72.0 29.3 20.5 16.2 65.5 21.4 Paris Club 31.9 60.6 52.7 64.1 59.5 13.9 8.6 4.8 50.4 8.8 Other official bilateral 6.2 12.3 12.2 11.6 11.8 14.5 10.5 9.2 11.9 11.1 Commercial 25.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.9 1.4 2.3 3.2 1.5 New debt 1.2 3.0 4.3 5.4 6.7 31.1 74.8 127.9 11.5 81.9 Debt service-to-exports ratio 9.5 5.3 4.7 4.3 2.8 0.9 1.3 1.7 3.4 1.4 Debt service-to-revenue ratio 13.2 6.7 6.1 5.9 4.9 2.8 3.4 3.4 5.7 3.4 Reduction in debt service as a result of MDRI assistance3 5.9 20.1 20.5 20.8 21.4 54.4 53.8 40.1 23.3 51.4 35 Table A5 (continued). Guinea: External Debt Service (In millions of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated) Projections Annual Averages 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2021 2026 2031 2012–21 2022-31 V. After enhanced HIPC, MDRI and bilateral beyond HIPC assistance 4 Total 128.1 26.3 27.2 30.8 32.1 63.1 112.1 160.8 49.3 118.1 Existing debt 127.0 23.3 23.0 25.4 25.4 32.0 37.3 32.9 37.8 36.2 Multilateral 80.5 8.3 8.5 11.1 11.1 16.3 24.9 21.2 19.6 23.1 World Bank 36.2 3.5 3.6 3.9 4.0 4.5 6.6 6.4 7.2 6.4 IMF2 2.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 AfDB Group 13.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.8 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.6 Other multilateral 28.5 2.5 2.5 4.9 4.8 9.0 14.8 11.3 8.3 13.0 Official bilateral 46.5 15.1 14.5 14.3 14.2 15.8 12.4 11.7 18.2 13.1 Paris Club 14.9 2.1 1.7 2.0 2.0 0.4 0.4 0.2 3.2 0.4 Other official bilateral 6.2 12.3 12.2 11.6 11.6 14.5 10.5 9.3 11.8 11.1 Commercial 25.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.9 1.4 2.3 3.2 1.5 New debt 1.2 3.0 4.3 5.4 6.7 31.1 74.8 127.9 11.5 81.9 Debt service-to-exports ratio 8.4 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.0 0.7 1.2 1.7 1.8 1.3 Debt service-to-revenue ratio 11.6 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.8 2.3 3.2 3.3 3.0 3.1 Memorandum items: Exports of goods & services (3-year mvg. avg.)5 1,526 1,609 1,669 2,162 3,195 8,441 9,124 9,675 4,476 9,232 Government revenue6 1,101 1,257 1,282 1,577 1,831 2,690 3,527 4,904 1,881 3,711 Sources: Guinean authorities, and World Bank and IMF staff estimates and projections. 1 Assumes a stock-of-debt operation on Naples terms (67 percent PV reduction) as of end of 2011, and at least comparable action by other official bilateral and commercial creditors. 2 The reduction is measured as the difference between the projected debt service after full use of traditional debt relief and debt service after the application of HIPC relief. 3 The reduction is measured as the difference between the projected debt service after application of HIPC relief and after application of MDRI relief. 4 Includes additional debt relief provided on a voluntary basis by the Paris Club beyond the requirements of the enhanced HIPC framework as specified in Table 12A. 5 As defined in IMF, Balance of Payments Manual, 5th edition, 1993. 6 Revenue is defined as central government revenue, excluding grants. 36 Table A6. Guinea: Present Value of External Debt1 (In millions of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated) Projections Annual Averages 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2021 2026 2031 2012–21 2022–31 I. Before traditional debt-relief mechanisms PV of total debt 2,715 2,683 2,631 2,573 2,506 2,475 2,780 2,816 2,379 2,601 2,715 PV of outstanding debt 2,715 2,575 2,460 2,342 2,224 2,114 1,660 1,274 966 2,084 1,252 Multilateral 1,551 1,488 1,426 1,362 1,299 1,236 927 598 318 1,205 575 World Bank 897 872 846 819 790 759 580 358 167 736 341 IMF 37 34 33 26 19 12 0 0 0 13 0 AfDB Group 302 295 289 282 276 270 232 180 127 265 175 Other multilateral 316 287 258 235 214 195 115 60 25 191 59 Official bilateral and commercial 1,163 1,087 1,034 980 925 878 733 676 648 879 676 Paris Club 798 757 714 670 624 584 472 440 431 586 442 Other official bilateral 304 293 284 274 265 257 225 200 181 256 198 Commercial 61 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 PV of new borrowing 108 171 230 281 361 1,120 1,542 1,413 517 1,463 II. After traditional debt-relief mechanisms2 PV of total debt 2,309 2,296 2,263 2,223 2,173 2,148 2,385 2,393 1,922 2,248 2,282 PV of outstanding debt 2,309 2,188 2,092 1,992 1,892 1,787 1,264 851 510 1,731 819 Multilateral 1,551 1,488 1,426 1,362 1,299 1,236 927 598 318 1,205 575 World Bank 897 872 846 819 790 759 580 358 167 736 341 IMF 37 34 33 26 19 12 0 0 0 13 0 AfDB Group 302 295 289 282 276 270 232 180 127 265 175 Other multilateral 316 287 258 235 214 195 115 60 25 191 59 Official bilateral and commercial 758 700 666 630 593 551 337 253 192 526 244 Paris Club 459 435 411 385 357 325 165 115 86 306 111 Other official bilateral 245 235 226 216 207 197 145 111 78 192 106 Commercial 55 30 30 29 29 29 27 27 27 29 27 PV of new borrowing 108 171 230 281 361 1,120 1,542 1,413 517 1,463 III. After conditional delivery of enhanced HIPC assistance 3 PV of total debt 2,600 1,867 1,881 1,897 1,889 1,912 2,356 2,418 1,954 2,025 2,308 PV of outstanding debt 2,600 1,759 1,711 1,667 1,608 1,551 1,236 876 541 1,508 845 Multilateral 1,549 1,004 1,005 1,006 1,005 1,002 928 655 384 989 628 World Bank 897 655 652 649 646 642 580 358 167 634 341 IMF 35 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 AfDB Group 302 164 165 166 166 167 170 163 127 167 156 Other multilateral 316 182 185 188 189 190 178 134 91 186 131 Official bilateral and commercial 1,051 755 705 660 603 549 308 221 157 519 217 Paris Club 695 497 452 414 362 314 112 65 47 289 67 Other official bilateral 271 210 205 199 193 187 148 110 72 182 106 Commercial 85 48 48 48 48 48 48 45 38 48 44 PV of new borrowing 108 171 230 281 361 1,120 1,542 1,413 517 1,463 IV. After unconditional delivery of enhanced HIPC assistance 4 PV of total debt 1,855 1,867 1,881 1,897 1,889 1,912 2,356 2,418 1,954 2,025 2,308 PV of outstanding debt 1,855 1,759 1,711 1,667 1,608 1,551 1,236 876 541 1,508 845 Multilateral 1,059 1,004 1,005 1,006 1,005 1,002 928 655 384 989 628 World Bank 676 655 652 649 646 642 580 358 167 634 341 IMF 5 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 AfDB Group 174 164 165 166 166 167 170 163 127 167 156 Others 204 182 185 188 189 190 178 134 91 186 131 Official bilateral and commercial 796 755 705 660 603 549 308 221 157 519 217 Paris Club 514 497 452 414 362 314 112 65 47 289 67 Other official bilateral 210 210 205 199 193 187 148 110 72 182 106 Commercial 72 48 48 48 48 48 48 45 38 48 44 PV of new borrowing 108 171 230 281 361 1,120 1,542 1,413 517 1,463 37 Table A6 (continued). Guinea: Present Value of External Debt1 (In millions of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated) Projections Annual Averages 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2021 2026 2031 2012–21 2022–31 V. After conditional delivery of enhanced HIPC and MDRI assistance PV of total debt 2,600 1,225 1,240 1,257 1,251 1,276 1,770 2,032 1,762 1,395 1,942 PV of outstanding debt 2,600 1,117 1,069 1,027 970 915 650 490 350 878 479 Multilateral 1,549 362 364 366 366 366 342 269 193 359 262 World Bank 897 101 101 101 100 99 93 74 52 98 72 IMF 35 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 AfDB Group 302 75 75 74 74 74 71 61 50 73 60 Others 316 182 185 188 189 190 178 134 91 186 131 Official bilateral and commercial 1,051 755 705 660 603 549 308 221 157 519 217 Paris Club 695 497 452 414 362 314 112 65 47 289 67 Other official bilateral 271 210 205 199 193 187 148 110 72 182 106 Commercial 85 48 48 48 48 48 48 45 38 48 44 PV of new borrowing 108 171 230 281 361 1,120 1,542 1,413 517 1,463 VI. After conditional delivery of enhanced HIPC and MDRI assistance and bilateral beyond HIPC assistance 5 PV of total debt 2,600 746 804 859 902 974 1,663 1,970 1,716 1,118 1,878 PV of outstanding debt 2,600 638 633 628 621 613 543 428 304 600 414 Multilateral 1,549 362 364 366 366 366 342 269 193 359 262 World Bank 897 101 101 101 100 99 93 74 52 98 72 IMF 35 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 AfDB Group 302 75 75 74 74 74 71 61 50 73 60 Others 316 182 185 188 189 190 178 134 91 186 131 Official bilateral and commercial 1,051 276 269 262 255 247 201 158 111 241 152 Paris Club 695 18 16 15 14 12 4 2 0 11 2 Other official bilateral 271 210 205 199 193 187 149 111 73 183 106 Commercial 85 48 48 48 48 48 48 45 38 48 44 PV of new borrowing 108 171 230 281 361 1,120 1,542 1,413 517 1,463 Memorandum items: VII. After unconditional delivery of enhanced HIPC and bilateral beyond HIPC assistance PV of total debt 1,373 1,388 1,445 1,499 1,540 1,610 2,249 2,356 1,907 1,747 2,244 PV of outstanding debt 1,373 1,280 1,274 1,268 1,259 1,249 1,129 814 495 1,230 781 Multilateral 1,059 1,004 1,005 1,006 1,005 1,002 928 655 384 989 628 Official bilateral and commercial 314 276 269 262 255 247 201 158 111 241 152 Paris Club 32 18 16 15 14 12 4 2 0 11 2 Other official bilateral 210 210 205 199 193 187 149 111 73 183 106 Commercial 72 48 48 48 48 48 48 45 38 48 44 PV of new borrowing 108 171 230 281 361 1,120 1,542 1,413 517 1,463 Sources: Guinean authorities, and World Bank and IMF staff estimates and projections. 1 Refers to public and publicly guaranteed external debt only and is discounted on the basis of the average commercial interest reference rate for the respective currency, derived over the six-month period prior to the latest date for which actual data are available (December 2011, see Table A1). 2 Assumes a stock-of-debt operation on Naples terms (67 percent PV reduction) as of end-2011, and at least comparable action by other official bilateral and commercial creditors. 3 Assumes interim relief under the enhanced HIPC Initiative from December 2000 to September 2012 and full delivery of assistance at Completion Point. 4 Assumes full delivery of estimated HIPC initiative debt relief at end-2011. 5 Includes additional debt relief provided on a voluntary basis by the Paris Club beyond the requirements of the enhanced HIPC framework as specified on Table A11. 38 Table A7. Guinea: Key External Debt Indicators, 2011–31 (In millions of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated) Projections Annual Averages 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2021 2026 2031 2012–21 2022–31 I. Before traditional debt-relief mechanisms PV of debt-to-GDP ratio 52.5 46.7 42.2 41.6 33.5 27.4 20.1 16.9 11.6 29.8 16.1 1 PV of debt-to-exports ratio 194.2 175.9 163.5 154.2 115.9 77.5 32.9 30.9 24.6 88.4 29.5 1 PV of debt-to-exports ratio (existing debt only) 194.2 168.8 152.9 140.4 102.9 66.2 19.7 14.0 10.0 77.1 13.7 2 PV of debt-to-revenue ratio 312.6 243.8 209.3 200.6 158.9 135.1 103.4 79.8 48.5 151.1 76.1 1 Debt service-to-exports ratio … 13.3 11.0 10.6 8.1 5.2 1.6 1.9 1.9 5.9 1.9 2 Debt service-to-revenue ratio … 18.5 14.1 13.8 11.1 9.0 5.1 4.9 3.8 9.9 4.7 II. After traditional debt-relief mechanisms PV of debt-to-GDP ratio 44.7 40.0 36.3 36.0 29.1 23.8 17.2 14.4 9.4 25.7 13.6 1 PV of debt-to-exports ratio 165.2 150.5 140.6 133.2 100.5 67.2 28.3 26.2 19.9 76.3 24.8 1 PV of debt-to-exports ratio (existing debt only) 165.2 143.4 130.0 119.4 87.5 55.9 15.0 9.3 5.3 65.0 9.0 2 PV of debt-to-revenue ratio 265.9 198.8 166.4 155.3 120.0 97.6 47.0 24.1 10.4 105.8 23.7 1 Debt service-to-exports ratio … 12.5 10.2 10.0 7.6 5.3 2.1 2.0 2.1 5.8 2.0 2 Debt service-to-revenue ratio … 17.4 13.1 13.0 10.5 9.2 6.5 5.1 4.1 10.0 5.0 III. After conditional delivery of enhanced HIPC assistance PV of debt-to-GDP ratio 50.3 32.5 30.2 30.7 25.3 21.2 17.0 14.5 9.5 22.7 13.7 1 PV of debt-to-exports ratio 186.0 122.4 116.9 113.7 87.4 59.9 27.9 26.5 20.2 66.1 25.1 1 PV of debt-to-exports ratio (existing debt only) 186.0 115.3 106.3 99.9 74.4 48.6 14.6 9.6 5.6 54.8 9.3 2 PV of debt-to-revenue ratio 299.4 169.6 149.6 147.9 119.8 104.4 87.6 68.6 39.8 115.3 64.8 1 Debt service-to-exports ratio ... 9.9 6.5 5.9 5.3 3.5 1.6 1.9 2.1 4.0 1.9 2 Debt service-to-revenue ratio ... 13.7 8.3 7.7 7.2 6.1 4.9 4.9 4.2 7.0 4.8 IV. After unconditional delivery of enhanced HIPC assistance PV of debt-to-GDP ratio 35.9 32.5 30.2 30.7 25.3 21.2 17.0 14.5 9.5 22.7 13.7 1 PV of debt-to-exports ratio 132.7 122.4 116.9 113.7 87.4 59.9 27.9 26.5 20.2 66.1 25.1 1 PV of debt-to-exports ratio (existing debt only) 132.7 115.3 106.3 99.9 74.4 48.6 14.6 9.6 5.6 54.8 9.3 2 PV of debt-to-revenue ratio 213.5 169.6 149.6 147.9 119.8 104.4 87.6 68.6 39.8 115.3 64.8 1 Debt service-to-exports ratio ... 9.9 6.5 5.9 5.3 3.5 1.6 1.9 2.1 4.0 1.9 2 Debt service-to-revenue ratio ... 13.7 8.3 7.7 7.2 6.1 4.9 4.9 4.2 7.0 4.8 V. After conditional delivery of enhanced HIPC and MDRI assistance PV of debt-to-GDP ratio 50.3 21.3 19.9 20.3 16.7 14.1 12.8 12.2 8.6 15.4 11.5 1 PV of debt-to-exports ratio 186.0 80.3 77.0 75.3 57.8 39.9 21.0 22.3 18.2 44.4 21.1 1 PV of debt-to-exports ratio (existing debt only) 186.0 73.2 66.4 61.5 44.8 28.6 7.7 5.4 3.6 33.1 5.2 2 PV of debt-to-revenue ratio 299.4 111.3 98.6 98.0 79.3 69.7 65.8 57.6 35.9 78.5 54.1 1 Debt service-to-exports ratio ... 9.5 5.3 4.7 4.3 2.8 0.9 1.3 1.7 3.4 1.4 2 Debt service-to-revenue ratio ... 13.2 6.7 6.1 5.9 4.9 2.8 3.4 3.4 5.7 3.4 VI. After conditional delivery of enhanced HIPC and MDRI assistance and bilateral beyond HIPC assistance PV of debt-to-GDP ratio 50.3 13.0 12.9 13.9 12.1 10.8 12.0 11.8 8.4 11.8 11.1 1 PV of debt-to-exports ratio 186.0 48.9 49.9 51.5 41.7 30.5 19.7 21.6 17.7 32.3 20.4 1 PV of debt-to-exports ratio (existing debt only) 186.0 41.8 39.3 37.6 28.7 19.2 6.4 4.7 3.1 21.0 4.5 2 PV of debt-to-revenue ratio 299.4 67.8 63.9 67.0 57.2 53.2 61.8 55.8 35.0 60.1 52.2 1 Debt service-to-exports ratio ... 8.4 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.0 0.7 1.2 1.7 1.8 1.3 2 Debt service-to-revenue ratio ... 11.6 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.8 2.3 3.2 3.3 3.0 3.1 Memorandum items: VII. After unconditional delivery of enhanced HIPC and bilateral beyond HIPC assistance 3 (in percent) PV of debt-to-GDP ratio 26.6 24.2 23.2 24.3 20.6 17.8 16.2 14.2 9.3 19.0 13.4 1 PV of debt-to-exports ratio 98.2 91.0 89.8 89.8 71.2 50.4 26.6 25.8 19.7 54.0 24.4 1 PV of debt-to-exports ratio (existing debt only) 98.2 83.9 79.2 76.0 58.2 39.1 13.4 8.9 5.1 42.7 8.5 2 PV of debt-to-revenue ratio 158.1 126.1 115.0 116.9 97.7 87.9 83.6 66.8 38.9 96.9 62.9 (in millions of U.S. dollars) GDP 5,170 5,744 6,237 6,180 7,475 9,028 13,855 16,637 20,464 9,681 17,145 1 Exports of goods and services 1,566 1,614 1,649 1,744 3,095 4,746 8,715 9,345 9,307 5,194 9,315 1 Exports of goods and services (3-year mvg. avg.) 1,398 1,526 1,609 1,669 2,162 3,195 8,441 9,124 9,675 4,476 9,232 2 Government revenue 869 1,101 1,257 1,282 1,577 1,831 2,690 3,527 4,904 1,881 3,711 Sources: Guinean authorities, and World Bank and IMF staff estimates and projections. 1 Based on a three-year moving average of exports of goods and services, as defined in IMF, Balance of Payments Manual, 5th edition, 1993. 2 Revenue is defined as central government revenue, excluding grants. 3 The PV of debt-to-exports ratio after unconditional delivery of enhanced HIPC and additional bilateral beyond HIPC assistance is the base for assessing whether topping-up assistance is warranted. The ratio at end-2011 also appears in text Table 2. 39 Table A8. Guinea: Sensitivity Analysis, 2011–311 (In percent, unless otherwise indicated) Projections Annual Averages 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2021 2026 2031 2012–21 2022–31 I. Baseline scenario PV of debt-to-GDP ratio 50.3 13.0 12.9 13.9 12.1 10.8 12.0 11.8 8.4 11.8 11.1 2 PV of debt-to-exports ratio 186.0 48.9 49.9 51.5 41.7 30.5 19.7 21.6 17.7 32.3 20.4 3 PV of debt-to-revenue ratio 299.4 67.8 63.9 67.0 57.2 53.2 61.8 55.8 35.0 60.1 52.2 2 Debt service-to-exports ratio … 8.4 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.0 0.7 1.2 1.7 1.8 1.3 3 Debt service-to-revenue ratio … 11.6 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.8 2.3 3.2 3.3 3.0 3.1 II. Permanently lower GDP growth PV of debt-to-GDP ratio 50.3 13.0 13.2 14.5 12.9 11.7 14.6 16.2 12.9 13.0 15.3 2 PV of debt-to-exports ratio 186.0 48.9 49.9 51.5 41.7 30.5 19.7 21.6 17.7 32.3 20.4 3 PV of debt-to-revenue ratio 299.4 67.8 64.6 68.4 59.0 55.5 68.2 65.2 43.2 63.0 61.0 2 Debt service-to-exports ratio … 8.4 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.0 0.7 1.2 1.7 1.8 1.3 3 Debt service-to-revenue ratio … 11.6 2.1 2.2 2.0 1.8 2.6 3.7 4.1 3.1 3.7 III. Permanently lower exports growth PV of debt-to-GDP ratio 50.3 13.0 12.9 13.9 13.7 13.9 18.1 18.7 13.9 14.9 17.6 2 PV of debt-to-exports ratio 186.0 48.9 49.9 51.5 46.0 39.4 35.4 40.7 35.2 40.7 38.6 3 PV of debt-to-revenue ratio 299.4 67.8 63.9 67.0 60.3 56.3 64.5 57.8 35.9 62.1 54.0 2 Debt service-to-exports ratio ... 8.4 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.3 1.3 2.3 3.3 2.1 2.4 3 Debt service-to-revenue ratio ... 11.6 2.1 2.1 2.1 1.9 2.4 3.3 3.4 3.1 3.2 IV. Lower average concessionality on new borrowing PV of debt-to-GDP ratio 50.3 13.6 13.7 14.8 12.8 11.5 12.5 10.5 6.4 12.5 9.9 2 PV of debt-to-exports ratio 186.0 51.1 53.1 54.9 44.4 32.4 20.5 19.2 13.5 34.3 18.1 3 PV of debt-to-revenue ratio 299.4 70.9 68.0 71.5 60.9 56.6 64.5 49.7 26.7 63.7 46.8 2 Debt service-to-exports ratio ... 8.5 1.9 2.4 2.2 1.7 1.5 2.0 1.8 2.3 1.9 3 Debt service-to-revenue ratio ... 11.8 2.4 3.1 3.1 2.9 4.8 5.2 3.5 4.3 4.8 Sources: Guinean authorities, and World Bank and IMF staff estimates and projections. 1 All debt indicators are defined after conditional delivery of enhanced HIPC and MDRI assistance and bilateral beyond HIPC assistance (item VI of Table A7) 2 Based on a three-year moving average of exports of goods and services, as defined in IMF, Balance of Payments Manual, 5th edition, 1993. 3 Revenue is defined as central government revenue, excluding grants. 40 Table A9. Guinea: Delivery of IDA Assistance under the Enhanced HIPC Initiative and the MDRI, 2012–20451 (In millions of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated) Cumulative 2012 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2025 2035 2045 2012-2020 2012-45 Jan-Sep Oct-Dec I. Relief under the Enhanced HIPC Initiative Debt service before HIPC assistance1 35.9 16.5 52.4 53.1 53.5 54.3 55.5 55.5 57.0 57.8 57.5 59.4 23.9 0.3 460.7 1,238.2 of which principal 29.8 14.0 43.8 44.8 45.5 46.6 48.2 48.6 50.4 51.6 51.7 55.6 23.3 0.3 401.4 1,136.1 of which interest 6.1 2.5 8.7 8.3 8.0 7.7 7.3 6.9 6.6 6.2 5.8 3.8 0.7 0.0 59.3 102.2 Debt service after HIPC assistance2 35.9 6.0 41.9 22.8 23.1 23.6 24.3 24.4 25.0 26.0 26.0 59.4 23.9 0.3 201.2 978.7 of which principal 29.8 5.0 34.7 18.5 18.9 19.6 20.5 20.8 21.5 22.6 22.8 55.6 23.3 0.3 170.2 904.8 of which interest 6.1 1.0 7.2 4.3 4.1 4.0 3.8 3.7 3.5 3.4 3.2 3.8 0.7 0.0 31.0 73.9 Savings on debt service to IDA 0.0 10.5 10.5 30.4 30.4 30.7 31.2 31.1 31.9 31.8 31.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 259.5 259.5 of which principal 0.0 9.0 9.0 26.3 26.5 27.0 27.7 27.8 28.9 28.9 28.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 231.2 231.2 of which interest 0.0 1.5 1.5 4.1 3.9 3.7 3.5 3.3 3.0 2.8 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.3 28.3 II. Relief under the MDRI3 Projected stock of IDA credits outstanding at implementation date 4 1,136.1 Remaining IDA credits after MDRI 143.6 Debt stock reduction on eligible credits 3,5 992.5 Due to HIPC relief 231.2 Due to MDRI 761.2 Debt service due after HIPC relief and the MDRI 35.9 0.3 36.2 3.5 3.6 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.3 4.3 6.5 6.2 0.3 31.8 161.8 Memorandum item: Debt service to IDA covered by HIPC assistance (in percent) 0.0 63.6 20.1 57.2 56.9 56.6 56.2 56.0 56.1 55.0 54.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 56.3 21.0 Debt service to IDA covered by HIPC assistance and MDRI (in percent) 0.0 98.1 31.0 93.4 93.2 92.9 92.9 92.8 93.0 92.5 92.5 89.0 74.1 0.0 93.1 86.9 IDA debt service relief under the MDRI (in SDR)6 0.0 3.5 3.5 11.9 12.1 12.2 12.6 12.7 13.0 13.4 13.4 32.8 10.9 0.0 104.9 505.5 IDA debt service relief due to HIPC assistance at Decision Point exchange rate (in USD)7 0.0 9.4 9.4 27.3 27.3 27.6 28.0 27.9 28.7 28.6 28.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 233.3 233.3 Source: IDA staff estimates. 1 Principal and interest due to IDA correspond to prorated projections on disbursed and outstanding debt as of end-December 2011, converted to U.S. dollar at end-2011 exchange rates. 2 Principal and interest due to IDA correspond to prorated projections on disbursed and outstanding debt as of end-December 2011 minus HIPC interim and post-CP debt service reduction disbursed and outstanding debt as of end-December 1999 3 Stock of debt and debt service denominated in SDRs are converted into U.S. dollar by applying the end-2011 exchange rate. 4 Stock of debt outstanding on October 1, 2012. 5 Debt disbursed as of December 31, 2003 and still outstanding at September 30, 2012. 6 For SDR denominated credits, debt relief under the MDRI is estimated as debt service on SDR denominated credits minus USD-based HIPC debt relief on these credits. HIPC debt relief is converted into SDR equivalent amounts, from July 2012 onwards, by applying the provisional IDA16 foreign exchange reference rate of 1.48899 U.S. dollars per SDR. For USD denominated credits, debt relief under the MDRI is estimated as debt service on USD denominated credits minus USD-based HIPC debt relief on these credits. The resulting MDRI debt relief amounts are converted into SDR equivalent amounts by applying the IDA16 foreign exchange reference rate. 7 Actual amount of debt service reduction due to HIPC assistance. Converted to U.S. dollar at end-1999 exchange rate. 41 Table A10. Guinea: Possible Delivery of IMF Assistance under the Enhanced HIPC Initiative and the MDRI, 2000–221 (In millions of SDRs, unless otherwise indicated) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Jan-Sep Oct-Dec . Pre-MDRI Debt relief (under the HIPC Initiative only)2 6.5 9.5 9.5 11.0 13.4 18.0 13.5 14.1 12.8 8.5 6.7 3.9 1.3 - 1.4 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.8 7.2 3.7 3.7 3.7 1.8 Principal 6.1 9.3 8.7 10.5 13.2 17.4 13.2 13.9 12.6 8.3 6.7 3.9 1.3 - 1.4 4.9 4.9 4.9 6.7 7.2 3.7 3.7 3.7 1.8 Interest 4 0.5 0.2 0.8 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.00 - - - - 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HIPC assistance--deposits into member's Umbrella Account Interim assistance - 2.4 2.7 - - - - 4.8 - - - - 1.3 Completion point disbursement 5 24.0 Completion point assistance 16.5 Completion point interest6 7.5 MF assistance--drawdown schedule from member's Umbrella Account - 2.4 1.0 1.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.7 4.1 0.1 - - 1.3 - 0.7 3.5 3.4 3.3 5.1 5.7 2.2 2.2 2.1 - IMF assistance without interest - 2.4 0.9 1.5 0.3 - - 0.7 4.1 - - - 1.3 - 0.7 0.8 1.6 2.1 3.3 3.4 1.9 2.1 0.7 - Estimated interest earnings 6 - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 - - - - 0.0 2.7 1.8 1.3 1.8 2.3 0.3 0.1 1.4 - Debt service due on IMF obligations after IMF assistance 6.5 7.1 8.5 9.5 13.1 18.0 13.5 13.3 8.7 8.4 6.7 3.9 - - 0.7 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.8 Delivery schedule of IMF assistance (in percent of the total assistance; on a flow basis) - 8.7 3.3 5.5 1.0 - - 2.7 14.8 - - - 4.6 - 2.4 3.0 5.9 7.4 11.9 12.2 6.8 7.4 2.4 - Share of debt service due on IMF obligations covered by HIPC assistance (in percent) - 25.5 10.2 14.1 2.3 0.0 0.0 5.3 32.0 0.8 - - 100.0 - - 71.0 68.9 67.0 75.1 78.7 58.2 59.5 56.8 - Proportion (in percent) of each repayment falling due during the period to be paid by HIPC assistance from the principal deposited in Umbrella Account - 26.2 10.6 14.6 2.2 - - 5.4 32.5 - - - 100.0 - - 16.8 33.7 42.1 49.0 47.0 51.7 56.2 18.0 - I. Post-MDRI Debt relief (under both MDRI and HIPC Initiatives) 24.0 Projected pre MDRI cutoff date debt at completion point 7,8 - Delivery of debt relief (on stock basis): from the MDRI-II Trust - from the HIPC Umbrella Account - Delivery of remaining HIPC assistance for post MDRI cutoff date debt (on stock basis) 24.0 Completion point disbursement 23.9 Umbrella account balance 0.0 II. Debt service due to the IMF after HIPC and MDRI debt relief9 6.5 7.1 8.5 9.5 13.1 18.0 13.5 13.3 8.7 8.4 6.7 3.9 - - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 3.7 3.7 3.7 1.8 Principal 6.1 6.8 7.7 9.0 12.9 17.4 13.2 13.1 8.5 8.2 6.7 3.9 - - - - - - - 6.0 3.7 3.7 3.7 1.8 Interest 0.5 0.2 0.8 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 - - - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Source: Fund staff estimates and projections. 1 Total IMF assistance under the enhanced HIPC Initiative amounts to SDR 27.8 million (equivalent to US$36 million using exchange rate on 12/20/2000) in end-December 1999 PV terms, somewhat higher than the amount calculated at the decision point (SDR 24.24 million or US$31.40 million) owing to debt revisions. This amount excludes interest earned in Guinea's Umbrella account and on committed but undisbursed amounts as described in footnote 6. Completion point (CP) is assumed on September 27, 2012. 2 Estimated delivery of HIPC assistance in the absence of MDRI decision. 3 Data are actual through end-July 2012. Forthcoming obligations after July 2012 are based on schedules in effect as of end-July 2012. Interest obligations exclude net SDR charges and assessments. 4 On December 1, 2011 the IMF Board extended through December 31, 2012, the waiver of interest payments for concessional loans that was introduced on January 7, 2010. For 2013, interest rates will be zero percent for ECF and RCF loans, and 0.25 percent per annum for the SCF and ESF loans After 2013, projected interest charges are based on 0.25 percent per annum. The Fund will review the interest rates for all PRGT facilities by end-2013 and every two years thereafter. 5 A final amount of SDR 16.5 million will be deposited into Guinea's Umbrella Account at CP expected in end-September 2012. 6 Includes estimated interest earnings on: (a) amounts held in Guinea's Umbrella Account; and (b) up to CP, amounts committed but not yet disbursed. The projected interest earnings are estimated based on assumed interest rates which are gradually rising to 4.5 percent in 2017 and beyond; actual interest earnings may be higher or lower. 7 Credit outstanding at end-2004 that has not been repaid by the member or with HIPC assistance at the completion point and is not scheduled to be repaid by HIPC assistance, as defined in the MDRI-II Trust Instrument. 8 Guinea has fully repaid its MDRI-eligible debt by end-July 2012. 9 Data prior to CP represent actual debt service paid and projected debt service as of end-September 2012. Debt service data after CP include repayments of ECF aprroved on 2/24/2012. Interest obligations exclude net SDR charges and assessments. 42 Table A11. Guinea: Status of Creditor Participation under the Enhanced HIPC Initiative1 Satisfactory Debt Relief in Percentage Reply to NPV Terms of Total Modalities to Deliver Debt Relief Participate in (US$ million) Assistance Initiative African Development Bank Group 94.4 14.8 Yes Interim relief provided in 2000-03 and 2008 amounts to USD 37.6 million in end- 1999 PV terms. At completion point, the AfDB Group is assumed to provide the remaining amount of relief through additional reduction of debt service on debt outstanding at end-December 1999 until full relief has been given. BADEA 10.4 1.6 Yes In 2004 and 2008, BADEA rescheduled accrued arrears falling due in 2005 and 2006 and in 2008, respectively, which represented relief of USD 2.0 million in end-1999 PV terms. At completion point, additional relief will be provided through a concessional rescheduling of debt. ECOWAS Bank for Investment and 1.7 0.3 No Not currently participating. Development European Investment Bank 4.3 0.7 Yes Interim relief amounting to USD 1.5 million in end-1999 PV terms provided through the cancellation of debt service on selected EIB loans. No outstanding EIB loans remain at completion point. Remaining HIPC relief will be provided on EU loans. European Union (administered by 32.0 5.0 Yes Interim relief amounting to USD 12.0 million in end-1999 PV terms provided by EIB) the EU through the cancellation of debt service and arrears on selected loans. At completion point, the EU will provide the remaining relief by providing debt service reduction on selected outstanding loans. World Bank 173.6 27.2 Yes Interim relief provided from 2001 to 2008 amounts to USD 75.8 million in end- 1999 PV terms. At completion point, IDA is assumed to provide the remaining amount of relief through a 68.5 percent reduction of Guinea’s debt service to IDA through December 2020. IFAD 8.0 1.3 Yes No interim relief provided. At completion point IFAD will provide up to 100 percent debt service relief until PV target is achieved. IMF 36.0 5.6 Yes Interim relief provided amounts to USD 14.6 million in nominal. At completion point, the IMF is assumed to provide the remaining amount of relief by (partially) cancelling principal payments until 2018. Islamic Development Bank 18.7 2.9 Yes In 2005 the IsDB rescheduled accrued arrears and payments falling due through December 2006, while it provided a three-year moratorium on payments on selected loans from 2008-10. This represented debt relief of USD 3.9 million in end-1999 PV terms. At completion point, additional relief will be provided through a concessional rescheduling of debt. OPEC Fund for International 4.1 0.6 Yes In 2002, OFID disbursed a concessional loan to refinance USD 9.0 million of Development (OFID) existing loans, which delivered USD 3.0 million in end-1999 PV terms of interim relief. At completion point, additional relief will be provided through a concessional rescheduling of debt. Total multilateral 383.0 60 Paris Club creditors 188.1 29 Yes Interim assistance is being provided through Cologne flow, and some creditors have cancelled 100% of flow during interim period. Stock of debt operation under Cologne terms (90 percent in PV reduction) is expected at completion point. Non-Paris Club creditors 65.3 10 Some The Guinean authorities have already sent letters to their non-Paris Club creditors requesting debt relief on Paris Club comparable terms. Bulgaria 1.2 0.2 No Being contacted by the Guinean authorities. China 9.8 1.5 Yes The People's Republic of China has provided debt relief by canceling all outstanding claims due before December 31, 2005. Egypt 2.9 0.4 Yes Egypt has provided debt relief by canceling all their outstanding debt as of 2008. Iraq 0.7 0.1 No Iraq has agreed in principle to negotiate possible debt relief. Korea, DPR 0.1 0.0 No North Korea has agreed in principle to negotiate possible debt relief. Kuwait 17.6 2.8 Yes Kuwait has provided its share of relief in 2009 by rescheduling outstanding claims up to September 1, 2009. Libya 4.3 0.7 No Libya signed a rescheduling agreement with Guinea in 2007, however the agreement is deemed not effective as Guinea has not made debt service payment in accordance to the agreement. Morocco 2.9 0.5 No Morocco has verbally agreed to provide debt relief through canceling all their end-99 claims. However no written confirmation has been received by the Guinean authorities yet. Romania 1.8 0.3 Yes Romania has already provided its proportionate share of HIPC assistance in 2006 by a stock of debt cancellation. Saudi Arabia 21.9 3.4 Yes Saudi Arabia has provided its share of relief in 2009 by rescheduling outstanding claims up to September 30, 2009. Thailand 0.5 0.1 No Being contacted by the Guinean authorities. Yugoslavia 1.6 0.3 No Being contacted by the Guinean authorities. Commercial creditors 2.8 0.4 No Total bilateral and commercial 256.1 40 Total 639.2 100 Sources: Guinean authorities, and World Bank and IMF staff estimates. 1 Based on the latest data available at the completion point after full application of traditional debt relief mechanisms. 43 Table A12. Paris Club Creditors' Delivery of Debt Relief under Bilateral Initiatives beyond the HIPC Initiative1 Countries Covered ODA (In percent) Non-ODA (In percent) Provision of Relief Pre-cutoff Post-cutoff Pre-cutoff Post-cutoff Date Debt Date Debt Date Debt Date Debt Decision Point Completion Point (In percent) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Australia HIPCs 100 100 100 100 2 2 2 Austria HIPCs 100 - 100 - Case-by-case, flow Stock 3 Belgium HIPCs 100 100 100 - 100 flow Stock Canada HIPCs 100 100 100 100 100 flow Stock 4 4 Denmark HIPCs 100 100 100 100 100 flow Stock France HIPCs 100 100 100 - 100 flow 5 Stock 6 6 Finland HIPCs 100 - 100 - - - Germany HIPCs 100 100 100 100 7 100 flow Stock Ireland - - - - - - - 8 Italy HIPCs 100 100 100 100 8 100 flow Stock Japan HIPCs 100 100 100 - - Stock 9 Netherlands, the HIPCs 100 100 100 - 90-100 flow 9 Stock 10 10 11 11 Norway HIPCs - - 12 12 Russia HIPCS - - 100 100 - Stock 13 13 Spain HIPCs 100 100 100 100 - Stock 14 Sweden HIPCs - - 100 - - Stock 15 15 16 Switzerland HIPCs - - 100 - 100 flow 16 Stock United Kingdom HIPCs 100 100 100 100 17 100 flow 17 Stock United States18 HIPCs 100 100 100 100 100 flow Stock Source: Paris Club Secretariat. 1 Columns (1) to (7) describe the additional debt relief provided following a specific methodology under bilateral initiatives and need to be read as a whole for each creditor. In column (1), "HIPCs" stands for eligible countries effectively qualifying for the HIPC process. A "100 percent" mention in the table indicates that the debt relief provided under the enhanced HIPC Initiative framework will be topped up to 100 percent through a bilateral initiative. 2 Australia: Australia cancelled all HIPC claims. 3 Belgium: cancellation at completion point 100 percent of ODA loans contracted before December 31, 2000. 4 Denmark provides 100 percent cancellation of ODA loans and non-ODA credits contracted and disbursed before September 27, 1999. 5 France: cancellation of 100 percent of debt service on pre-cutoff date commercial claims on the government as they fall due starting at decision point. Once countries have reached completion point, debt relief on ODA claims on the government will go to a special account and will be used for specific development projects. 6 Finland: no post-Cutoff date claims 7 If not treated in the Agreed Minutes at Completion Point, debt cancellation of 100 % only on a case by case basis. 8 Italy: cancellation of 100 percent of all debts (pre- and post-cutoff date, ODA and non-ODA) incurred before June 20,1999 (the Cologne Summit). At decision point, cancellation of accrued arrears and maturities falling due in the interim period. At completion point, cancellation of the stock of remaining debt. 9 The Netherlands: 100 percent ODA (pre- and post-cutoff date debt will be cancelled at decision point); for non-ODA: in some particular cases (Benin, Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Ghana, Mali, Mozambique, Nicaragua, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia), the Netherlands will write off 100 percent of the consolidated amounts on the flow at decision point; all other HIPCs will receive interim relief up to 90 percent reduction of the consolidated amounts. At completion point, all HIPCs will receive 100 per cent cancellation of the remaining stock of the pre-cutoff date debt. 10 Norway has cancelled all ODA claims. 11 Due to the current World Bank/IMF methodology for recalculating debt reduction needs at HIPC completion point, Norway has postponed the decisions on whether or not to grant 100% debt reduction until after HIPCs' completion point. 12 Russia has no ODA claims 13 Spain provides 100 percent cancellation of ODA and non-ODA claims contracted before January 1, 2004 14 Sweden has no ODA claims. 15 Switzerland has cancelled all ODA claims. 16 Switzerland usually writes off 100 percent of government-owned claims of the remaining debt stock at Completion Point and provides at least full HIPC debt relief of claims held by the ECA (100% cancellation of all remaining claims with the exception of Honduras and Cameroon). 17 United Kingdom: "beyond 100 percent" full write-off of all debts of HIPCs as of their decision points, and reimbursement at decision point of any debt service paid before the decision point. 18 United States: cancellation of 100 percent of all debts (pre- and post-cutoff date, ODA and non-ODA) incurred before June 20, 1999 (the Cologne Summit). At decision point, cancellation of accrued arrears and maturities falling due in the interim period. At completion point, cancellation of the stock of remaining eligible debt. 44 Table A13. HIPC Initiative: Status of Country Cases Considered Under the Initiative, June 30, 2012 Target Estimated Total 1 PV of Debt-to- Assistance Levels Percentage Nominal Debt Decision Completion Gov. (In millions of U.S. dollars, present value) Reduction Service Relief Country Point Point Exports revenue Bilateral and Multilateral in PV of (In millions of 2 (in percent) Total commercial Total IMF World Bank Debt U.S. dollars) Completion point reached under enhanced framework (33) Afghanistan Jul. 07 Jan. 10 150 582 446 136 - 76 51 1,280 Benin Jul. 00 Mar. 03 150 265 77 189 24 84 31 460 Bolivia 1,302 425 876 84 194 2,060 original framework Sep. 97 Sep. 98 225 448 157 291 29 54 14 760 enhanced framework Feb. 00 Jun. 01 150 854 268 585 55 140 30 1,300 Burkina Faso 553 83 469 57 231 930 original framework Sep. 97 Jul. 00 205 229 32 196 22 91 27 400 enhanced framework Jul. 00 Apr. 02 150 195 35 161 22 79 30 300 topping-up … Apr. 02 150 129 16 112 14 61 24 230 Burundi Aug. 05 Jan. 09 150 833 127 706 28 425 92 1,366 Cameroon Oct. 00 Apr. 06 150 1,267 879 322 37 176 27 4,917 Central African Rep. Sept. 07 Jun. 09 150 578 186 362 27 207 68 804 Congo Rep. of Mar. 06 Jan. 10 250 1,575 1,462 113 8 47 31 1,738 Congo, Democratic Rep. of Jul. 03 Jul. 10 150 7,252 4,618 2,633 471 854 82 11,105 Cote d'Ivoire Mar. 09 Jun. 12 250 3,109 2,398 711 39 413 24 6,367 Ethiopia 1,982 637 1,315 60 832 3,275 enhanced framework Nov. 01 Apr. 04 150 1,275 482 763 34 463 47 1,941 topping-up … Apr. 04 150 707 155 552 26 369 31 1,334 Gambia, The Dec. 00 Dec. 07 150 67 17 49 2 22 27 112 Ghana Feb. 02 Jul. 04 144 250 2,186 1,084 1,102 112 781 56 3,500 Guinea-Bissau 554 279 275 12 139 933 enhanced framework Dec. 00 Dec. 10 150 422 218 204 12 93 86 703 topping-up … Dec. 10 150 133 61 71 - 46 40 230 Guyana 591 223 367 75 68 1,354 original framework Dec. 97 May 99 107 280 256 91 165 35 27 24 634 enhanced framework Nov. 00 Dec. 03 150 250 335 132 202 40 41 40 719 Haiti Nov. 06 Jun. 09 150 140 20 120 3 53 15 213 Honduras Jul. 00 Mar. 05 110 250 556 215 340 30 98 18 1,000 Liberia Mar. 08 Jun. 10 150 2,739 954 1,421 730 374 90 4,607 Madagascar Dec. 00 Oct. 04 150 836 474 362 19 252 40 1,900 Malawi 1,057 171 886 45 622 1,628 enhanced framework Dec. 00 Aug. 06 150 646 164 482 30 333 44 1,025 topping-up … Aug. 06 150 411 7 404 15 289 35 603 Mali 539 169 370 59 185 895 original framework Sep. 98 Sep. 00 200 121 37 84 14 43 9 220 enhanced framework Sep. 00 Mar. 03 150 417 132 285 45 143 29 675 Mauritania Feb. 00 Jun. 02 137 250 622 261 361 47 100 50 1,100 Mozambique 2,023 1,270 753 143 443 4,300 original framework Apr. 98 Jun. 99 200 1,717 1,076 641 125 381 63 3,700 enhanced framework Apr. 00 Sep. 01 150 306 194 112 18 62 27 600 Nicaragua Dec. 00 Jan. 04 150 3,308 2,175 1,134 82 191 73 4,500 Niger 663 235 428 42 240 1,190 enhanced framework Dec. 00 Apr. 04 150 521 211 309 28 170 53 944 topping-up … Apr. 04 150 143 23 119 14 70 25 246 Rwanda 696 65 631 63 383 1,316 enhanced framework Dec. 00 Apr. 05 150 452 56 397 44 228 71 839 topping-up … Apr. 05 150 243 9 235 20 154 53 477 São Tomé and Príncipe 124 31 93 1 47 263 enhanced framework Dec. 00 Mar. 07 150 99 29 70 - 24 83 215 topping-up … Mar. 07 150 25 2 23 1 23 45 49 Senegal Jun. 00 Apr. 04 133 250 488 212 276 45 124 19 850 Sierra Leone Mar. 02 Dec. 06 150 675 335 340 125 123 81 994 Tanzania Apr. 00 Nov. 01 150 2,026 1,006 1,020 120 695 54 3,000 Togo Nov. 08 Dec. 10 250 282 127 155 0.3 102 20 272 Uganda 1,003 183 820 160 517 1,950 original framework Apr. 97 Apr. 98 202 347 73 274 69 160 20 650 enhanced framework Feb. 00 May 00 150 656 110 546 91 357 37 1,300 Zambia Dec. 00 Apr. 05 150 2,499 1,168 1,331 602 493 63 3,900 Decision point reached under enhanced framework (3) Chad May. 01 Floating 150 170 35 134 18 68 30 260 Comoros Jun. 10 Floating 150 145 33 111 4 45 56 122 Guinea Dec. 00 Floating 150 545 215 328 31 151 32 800 Sources: IMF and World Bank Board decisions, completion point documents, decision point documents, preliminary HIPC documents, and staff calculations. 1 Assistance levels are at countries' respective Decision or Completion Points, as applicable. 2 In percent of the present value of debt at the Decision or Completion Point (as applicable), after the full use of traditional debt-relief mechanisms. 45 APPENDIX I—GUINEA: DEBT MANAGEMENT1 1. Guinea’s legal and institutional framework clearly defines who has authority to borrow and the responsibilities in negotiating new loans and making payments. According to the charter budget law (2008), only the Minister of Economy and Finance has the authority to borrow from legal entities, exclusively for the purposes defined in the law itself and for the amounts and modalities established in the annual budget law. According to a recent decree, the National Debt and Public Development Aid Directorate (DND)2 will participate in searching for new financing and in negotiations for new loans (front office functions), and will be responsible for elaborating a debt management strategy (middle office). The DND is also responsible for managing, recording, and reporting on domestic and external debt and debt-related transactions and domestic debt, including securitized liabilities to the Central Bank of the Republic of Guinea (BCRG) and domestic suppliers (back office). The BCRG acts as the agent of the Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF) for managing the domestic Treasury-bill market and is responsible for making external debt payments as instructed by the DND. 2. However, borrowing is currently not based on a medium-term debt management strategy. At present, the only explicit external debt management goal is to contract external borrowing only on concessional terms with a minimum grant element of 35 percent as indicated in the ECF-supported program, which the DND checks during new loan negotiations. 3. The debt data recording capacity remains weak and not centralized. Formally, the DND uses the CS-DRMS 2000+ debt recording and management system, which is hosted off-site by the National Information Systems Directorate. In practice, staff for external debt works mainly on the basis of locally hosted spreadsheets, because access to CS-DRMS is difficult due to frequent power cuts and other technical issues. These spreadsheets mainly cover monthly debt service payment forecasts, and are validated against creditor statements. Every year a data call is sent out to all creditors to provide debt service payment projections for the next fiscal year, which is then integrated into the budget. The lack of timely and systematic information on new disbursements and sometimes on new loans3 further complicates debt recording. Staffs were able to show debt records and contracts upon request, but a decent filing system seems to be lacking. 4. The DND publishes quarterly bulletins and has published an annual activity report. The DND regularly reports the principal debt indicators to the Minister of Finance in an internal report and to external partners, and produces annual activity reports. The Treasurer reports regularly on the outstanding stock of Treasury-bills. External or internal debt audits are conducted on domestic debt but not on external debt, although the authorities acknowledge the need for it. 5. Staff seems to be unevenly distributed, and although staff capacity seems adequate for basic debt management functions, more training is needed. Although the 1 Guinea received a World Bank Debt Management Performance Assessment (DeMPA) in 2008. 2 See Arrêté N°//MEF/CAB/2011 portant attributions et organisation de la Direction nationale de la dette et de l’aide publique au développement. 3 In practice, there have been cases where another minister has signed loan contracts with a bilateral creditor. 46 DND has 66 staff, the bilateral debt unit had about four staff, while the multilateral debt unit at the time of the completion point only had one staff, even though the recently adopted organizational chart has assigned three staff for each unit. Staff generally have university degrees and has been trained in the use of the debt management software, and regularly attend training events organized by the Commonwealth Secretariat. Some staff were also trained on debt sustainability analysis and other debt management activities (e.g., DeMPA, creating a procedures manual for debt management) at regional training events organized by the World Bank, IMF West AFRITAC, the AfDB, and Pôle-Dette, recently in March 2012 in Mali, and June 2012 in Senegal. 6. Debt management needs to be strengthened. Notwithstanding the formal and legal centralized authority of the Minister of Finance to approve any external borrowing (see above), two lapses occurred in 2011 when a newly created entity (SOGUIPAMI) responsible for managing the government’s assets in the mining sector was the cause for the contracting of two external loans. To avoid a recurrence, the government is undertaking a study with World Bank assistance of the appropriate institutional structure to manage the government’s mining sector assets and related large infrastructure projects, and in the meantime has strictly curtailed SOGUIPAMI’s independence and operations. In particular it cannot contract any external loans or other liabilities. 7. The completion point provides a good opportunity to improve debt management. HIPC and MDRI debt relief at the completion point will significantly reduce the stock of external debt and provides a clean slate for the country. At the same time, a reduced debt burden may eventually lead to a gradual easing of the limits placed on less concessional financing. It is therefore recommended that Guinea take steps to improve debt management in order to be prepared for this new era. In the area of governance, better information sharing (for example on new disbursements) is needed with the DND. A debt management strategy approved by the Minister of Finance could provide clear guidance to the DNIP for borrowing, such that the cost and financial risks are minimized. Debt management activities should be audited and recommendations for improvement should be followed. Complementary to strengthening debt management, the government should pay attention to building its capacity to evaluate PPPs to ensure they do not entail contingent liabilities to the government. Staff could be used more efficiently. Investment in hardware is needed to make sure that CS-DRMS is used in real time, and becomes the unique database for external and domestic debt. Moreover, filing system of contracts, agreements and invoices could be enhanced to improve efficiency. The authorities should continue to produce annual activity reports and debt reports. 47 APPENDIX II— GUINEA: JOINT BANK-FUND DEBT SUSTAINABILITY ANALYSIS UNDER THE DEBT SUSTAINABILITY FRAMEWORK FOR LOW-INCOME COUNTRIES1 The debt sustainability analysis (LIC-DSA) shows that Guinea is at a moderate risk of debt distress. After full HIPC, MDRI and beyond-HIPC debt relief, all external indicators remain under their indicative thresholds throughout the projection period. However, the country remains vulnerable to certain macroeconomic shocks, especially during the first half of the projection period. The public sector debt sustainability analysis (DSA) indicates that Guinea’s domestic debt is significant but is expected to decrease over the longer run and does not alter the assessment. The remaining vulnerability to macroeconomic shocks indicates the need for prudent fiscal policies and debt management. I. BACKGROUND 1. This analysis (LIC-DSA) is based on the Debt Sustainability Framework (DSF) for Low-Income Countries. The DSA presents the projected path of Guinea’s external and public sector debt indicators, and assesses the country’s risk of external debt distress. The LIC-DSA and the HIPC Initiative Debt Relief Analysis (HIPC-DRA) share the same macroeconomic assumptions for the baseline, but methodologically, they differ. The LIC-DSA compares the evolution over the projection period of debt burden indicators against policy-dependent indicative thresholds. In contrast, under the HIPC-DRA, the historical debt burden indicators are compared to uniform thresholds in order to calculate the amount of HIPC debt relief that Guinea qualifies for in the context of the HIPC Initiative. In addition, the results of the LIC-DSA differ from the HIPC-DRA because of methodological differences related to the definition of the discount rates and the exchange rates used.2 2. This LIC-DSA3 updates the analysis of the external and public debt of Guinea that was considered by the Executive Board of the IMF in February 2012.4At that time Guinea had been in debt distress since 2007, as evidenced by the accumulation of external debt service arrears. 1 The DSA was prepared jointly by the staffs of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, in collaboration with the authorities of Guinea. The fiscal year in Guinea is January 1 to December 31. 2 The LIC-DSA and HIPC-DRA also differ because of the treatment of the French debt-for-development swaps (C2D). 3 The DSAs presented in this document are based on the low-income countries (LIC) DSA framework. Under the Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA), Guinea is rated as a weak performer, with an average rating of 2.86 in 2008–10; the DSA uses the indicative threshold indicators for countries in this category. See “Debt Sustainability in Low-Income Countries: Proposal for an Operational Framework and Policy Implicationsâ€? (http://www.imf.org/external/np/pdr/sustain/2004/020304.htm and IDA/SECM2004/0035, 2/3/04) and “Debt Sustainability in Low-Income Countries: Further Considerations on an Operational Framework, Policy Implicationsâ€? http://www.imf.org/external/np/pdr/sustain/2004/091004.htm and IDA/SECM2004/0629, 9/10/04) and “A Review of Some Aspects of the Low-Income Country Debt Sustainability Frameworkâ€? (http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2009/080509a.pdf) and “Staff Guidance Note on the Application of the Joint Bank-Fund Debt Sustainability Framework for Low-Income Countriesâ€? (http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2010/012210.pdf) 4 See Supplement of IMF Country Report No. 12/63, March 2012, on LIC-DSA which can be found at: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2012/cr1263.pdf 48 3. At end-2011, Guinea’s public and publicly guaranteed external debt was $3,194 million, or 62 percent of 2011 GDP.5 The level of debt in nominal terms has been broadly stable in recent years, reflecting a low level of new loans and debt service paid, but with arrears accounting for a growing share (amounting to 12 percent of end-2011 debt outstanding).6 Multilateral creditors accounted for 62 percent of the total, with the AfDB group and IDA accounting for almost four-fifths of the multilaterals’ share. Paris Club creditors accounted for 25 percent of total, while official bilateral non-Paris Club and commercial creditors made up the rest.7 4. External debt service arrears reached $371 million at end-2011. Paris Club creditors accounted for 60 percent of the total. During 2011, the government cleared its arrears with all multilateral creditors and resumed debt service payments in full to them. HIPC interim assistance was discontinued by a majority of creditors in 2009–10. 5. In April, 2012 the Paris Club and the Government of Guinea concluded a debt relief agreement on exceptional terms, including the rescheduling of post-cutoff date maturities and arrears.8 In addition, agreement was reached with European Union that outstanding arrears would in part be cancelled in 2011. Another part was frozen and will be cleared at the HIPC completion point using European Development Fund resources of the EU. As a result, outstanding arrears were reduced by about two-thirds; the remainder is to non-Paris Club official bilateral and commercial creditors on which no further debt service maturities fall due. 6. The level of public domestic debt reflects the considerable increase in 2009–10 of advances by the central bank to the government. During the military regime (2009-10), soaring expenditures were financed by borrowing from the domestic banking system. The liabilities of the government to the domestic banking system increased sharply from 13 percent of GDP in 2008, to 19 percent in 2009, and 30 percent in 2010. In 2011, large exceptional revenue from the mining sector (15 percent of GDP) was deposited at the central bank. The government has committed to refraining from any domestic bank financing of the budget other than stemming from the drawdown of this deposit. At end-June 2012, the stock of public domestic debt amounted to 11 percent of GDP, divided almost evenly between central bank advances and treasury bills held by domestic banks. 5 Excluding arrears to the EU which, by agreement, have been frozen pending clearance at the HIPC completion point using European Development Fund resources of the EU. 6 This share includes arrears to Paris Club creditors which were restructured under the April 2012 debt relief agreement. Excluding these arrears the share of arrears in end-2011 debt would be 7 percent. 7 Guinea has no debt service obligations falling due to commercial creditors, and arrears account for the full amount of debt outstanding. 8 The cut-off date is January 1, 1986. 49 Guinea: Structure of External Public Debt (end-2011, nominal) Text Table 1 Text Figure 1 US$ million Percent of GDP Total 3,194 61.77 Multilateral creditors 1,966 38.02 IMF 42 0.80 World Bank 1,166 22.55 AfDB Group 393 7.60 IsDB 143 2.77 EU 59 1.14 Other multilateral creditors 163 3.15 Official bilateral creditors 1,142 22.10 Paris Club 813 15.73 Non-Paris Club 193 3.72 Arab Funds 137 2.65 Commercial creditors 85 1.65 Sources: Guinea authorities, and AfDB, World Bank, and IMF staff estimates II. BASELINE ASSUMPTIONS 7. The macroeconomic assumptions of the LIC-DSA are broadly consistent with those used in the HIPC-DRA and those of the February 2012 LIC-DSA (Box 2 above). The baseline assumes a large increase in FDI which would underpin the start of large mining investments and a sizeable expansion in economic activity; political stability; sound macroeconomic management; prudent borrowing policies; and advancement in structural reforms over the medium term. It also assumes a substantial rise in public investment, especially in long-neglected infrastructure and the energy sector, as well as government support to develop agriculture and improve the business climate. These policies would provide a foundation for an increase in private investment, and would contribute to diversification of the economy and unlocking Guinea’s long-run economic growth potential. Risks with regard to the macroeconomic projections include renewed political instability, especially in the run-up to parliamentary elections that were due in 2011 but that have been postponed several times, the potential further deterioration in the global economic outlook and mineral prices, and the possibility of projected mining production and revenues not materializing. With regard to external debt and financing needs, the DRA assumes all post-cut-off date ODA debt to be cancelled as part of beyond HIPC bilateral debt relief, and the LIC-DSA assumes that such claims held by France of €166 million (about $210 million) are to be converted into debt-for development-swaps (C2D) over 3 years. 8. The baseline scenario reflects the full delivery of HIPC completion point, MDRI and beyond-HIPC relief, as in the HIPC-DRA. The results below are broadly in line with the alternative scenario related to HIPC and MDRI relief in the February 2012 LIC-DSA, with 50 a number of differences. The analysis discussed below incorporates the impact of beyond HIPC bilateral relief. Also, updated projections of debt service (based on the HIPC completion point data reconciliation) and updated calculations of the delivery of HIPC and MDRI relief were used. These revisions lead to lower post-completion point debt burden indicators. In addition, the LIC-DSA assumes that French post-cut-off date ODA claims are converted into debt-for- development swaps (C2D) over 2012-15, thereby increasing debt service in the short term.9 The initial fall in debt service relative to the 2012 LIC-DSA is dampened by the onset of the payments under C2D and the assumed restructuring of arrears to non-official bilateral and commercial creditors; under the 2012 Paris Club agreement payments to this group of creditors were already very low. Debt relief from multilateral financial institutions leads to a considerable reduction in debt service payments. III. EXTERNAL DEBT SUSTAINABILITY ANALYSIS 9. Under the baseline scenario, Guinea’s external debt indicators remain below their relevant indicative thresholds throughout the projection period (Table 1, Figure 1). Debt stock and debt service ratios would immediately fall and remain below their policy thresholds. The sharp drop reflects in particular the impact of HIPC and MDRI relief from multilaterals, especially the World Bank, which holds the largest share of Guinea’s multilateral debt (almost 60 percent at end-2011). The PV of external debt-to-GDP and PV of external debt-to-exports ratios fall in 2012 and again in 2015, reflecting the end of C2D payments, and remain relatively stable over the projection period. The stability of the ratios despite a rise in public investment relative to GDP reflects the impact of the projected sizeable expansion in the mining sector after 2015. This expansion not only leads to significant increases in exports and GDP, but also in fiscal revenues. In turn, the increase in fiscal revenues reduces the need for public borrowing to finance higher public investment. Debt service ratios also remain below their indicative thresholds over the projection period; the impact of the end of C2D payments is accentuated for these debt service indicators. 10. Alternative scenarios and stress tests show that the external debt burden indicators are vulnerable to adverse shocks (Figure 1): ï‚· If the main economic variables remain at their historical level, and policy improvements and the expected growth dividend assumed under the baseline do not materialize, the PV of debt-to-GDP ratio would rise above the policy threshold after 2022, and then begin to decline toward the end of the projection period. The PV of debt-to-revenue also deteriorates, but remains below the policy threshold, and then declines over the longer run; the PV of debt-to-exports ratio shows a similar deterioration but continues to rise throughout the projection period while remaining below the policy threshold. The indicators are also very sensitive to exogenous shocks. 9 Under C2`D (Contrats de désendettement et développement) the existing debt service maturities are consolidated and re-profiled, and when they are paid, they are returned to the country through grants from France into development spending. 51 ï‚· Under most of the shocks considered in this analysis, the debt burden indicators would deteriorate;10 the shocks on exports and on non-debt creating flows (such as net foreign direct investment), and a combination shock are particularly important resulting in a significant worsening of the debt burden indicators. This reflects the fact that the improvement in macroeconomic prospects depends heavily on the projected large inflow of foreign direct investments in the mining sector and the related jump in mining exports. 11. Guinea’s external debt sustainability will be affected by the modalities of the government’s participation in large-scale infrastructure and mining projects.11 In the near- term this issue is raised in the context of the prospective SIMFER mining and infrastructure project. The total cost of the two projects is tentatively estimated at about $17-18 billion (one- third mining and two-thirds for infrastructure), of which the government has options for a substantial participation. Full take up of these options would entail commensurately large financial contributions to the projects. Moreover this issue would be raised in possible similar future projects. While no decisions have yet been taken by the government on how much of its possible stake to take up or on the financing of its contribution, it has stated clearly that its participation will not involve direct borrowing or guarantees by the government. Instead it intends, for these projects and possible similar future projects, to rely on private-public partnerships through special purpose financing vehicles for which financing costs would be fully covered by project revenues, and involve no contingent liabilities to the government. The participation of the IFC in the SIMFER and possible participation of the World Bank in the infrastructure project should help ensure that the projects are designed to be viable. 12. While the use of PPPs to finance the government’s participation in large-scale projects is a useful strategy to maintain external debt sustainability , given the magnitude of these projects it will be important that the government strengthen its capacity to ensure that any financing agreement does not include contingent liabilities, and second that projections of revenues are well-based and sufficient to cover financing costs of the PPP and thus avoid possible implicit contingent liabilities in situations where the collapse of a project could have widespread damaging economic and social impacts. The assumption of any liability, could lead to sharp deterioration in debt burden indicators, particularly on debt service ratios. IV. PUBLIC SECTOR DEBT SUSTAINABILITY 13. The inclusion of domestic debt in the debt sustainability analysis worsens the debt burden indicators, although the domestic debt burden is expected to decrease over time (Table 3 and Figure 2). Following the large increase in borrowing from the domestic banking system in 2009–10, the authorities virtually eliminated new borrowing in 2011, and in 2012-13 there is no new domestic financing planned for the budget, while net repayments of domestic debt are expected to resume.12 As a result, the PV of public debt-to-GDP ratio would gradually decline from 29 percent of 2012 GDP to 9.8 percent of GDP at the end of the projection period. 10 Simulations included shocks on GDP growth, export growth, inflation, non-debt creating flows, and exchange rate depreciation. The combination shock includes one-half standard deviation shocks to real GDP growth, exports, GDP deflator and net non-debt creating flows. 11 See also discussion in the HIPC DRA. 12 Under an agreement between the Ministry of Economy and Finance and the central bank, the government will repay its advances over a period of 40 years, starting in 2020. 52 Debt service on total public debt would drop in 2012, and then again in 2015, and thereafter remain broadly stable reflecting largely the external debt service trend described above. 14. The public debt position is vulnerable to shocks, particularly to policy reversals (Table 4 and Figure 2). Under the fixed primary balance, historical average and the most extreme shock scenarios, the public debt burden indicators would be at least twice as high compared to the trajectories under the baseline scenario in the long term; in addition, the indicators show a rising trend over the projection period for the fixed primary balance scenario. 15. In light of the results of the baseline and alternative scenarios as well as the stress tests, IDA and IMF staffs conclude that Guinea is at a moderate risk of debt distress. V. CONCLUSIONS 16. This LIC-DSA shows that Guinea would be at a moderate risk of debt distress after the HIPC completion point. This compares to the “in debt distressâ€? assessment in the February 2012 LIC-DSA. Under the current baseline scenario, the HIPC Initiative, MDRI and beyond- HIPC relief significantly improve the external debt indicators over the projection period. All debt burden indicators remain below their policy-dependent thresholds throughout the projection period. Alternative scenarios and stress tests reveal the vulnerability of Guinea’s external debt outlook, as the debt burden indicators rise and some breach the policy thresholds. The inclusion of domestic debt moderately weakens the debt outlook, but does not alter the assessment of Guinea’s risk of debt distress. 17. This LIC-DSA underscores the importance of sustained implementation of sound macroeconomic policies, improvements in the business environment, and prudent debt management. Such policies are key to realizing the expected growth dividend, especially expansion of activity in the mining sector, and improved export and fiscal revenue performance, and with sound debt management are important for maintaining debt sustainability. In addition, the stress tests underscore the need for reducing the vulnerability of revenue and exports to commodity prices, in particular of metals, through output and export diversification. Debt relief under the HIPC Initiative, MDRI and beyond-HIPC assistance provides significant space for Guinea to access more concessional financing, increasing its ability to address its considerable public investment needs and improving growth prospects. However, in light of remaining vulnerabilities, large-scale new borrowing should be avoided and the authorities have emphasized their commitment to ensure that the government’s participation in large-scale infrastructure projects and mining projects does not involve the use of budget resources to meet the associated financing needs; instead the government intends to make use of public-private partnerships (PPPs) in which project revenues are used to service debt committed under the project, thus avoiding significant government borrowing on nonconcessional terms.13 However, to ensure that PPP agreements do not entail contingent liabilities, the administrative capacity to evaluate such liabilities needs to be strengthened and a clear regulatory framework for such partnerships needs to be established. 18. The Guinean authorities broadly concurred with the assumptions and conclusions of the DSA. 13 See Supplement of IMF Country Report No. 12/63, March 2012 on LIC-DSA for a fuller discussion of this issue. 53 Figure 1. Guinea: Indicators of Public and Publicly Guaranteed External Debt under Alternatives Scenarios, 2012-2032 1/ a. Debt Accumulation b.PV of debt-to GDP ratio 6 45 80 40 70 5 35 4 60 30 3 50 25 2 20 40 15 30 1 10 20 0 5 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032 10 -1 0 0 Rate of Debt Accumulation 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032 Grant-equivalent financing (% of GDP) Grant element of new borrowing (% right scale) c.PV of debt-to-exports ratio 400 d.PV of debt-to-revenue ratio 250 350 200 300 250 150 200 100 150 100 50 50 0 0 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032 e.Debt service-to-exports ratio f.Debt service-to-revenue ratio 16 20 14 18 16 12 14 10 12 8 10 8 6 6 4 4 2 2 0 0 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032 Baseline Historical scenario Most extreme shock 1/ Threshold Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections. 1/ The most extreme stress test is the test that yields the highest ratio in 2022. In figure b. it corresponds to a Combination shock; in c. to a Combination shock; in d. to a Combination shock; in e. to a Combination shock and in figure f. to a Combination shock 54 Figure 2.Guinea: Indicators of Public Debt Under Alternative Scenarios, 2012-2032 1/ Baseline Fix Primary Balance Most extreme shock Growth Historical scenario 60 PV of Debt-to-GDP Ratio 50 40 30 20 10 0 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 250 PV of Debt-to-Revenue Ratio 2/ 200 150 100 50 0 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 18 16 Debt Service-to-Revenue Ratio 2/ 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections. 1/ The most extreme stress test is the test that yields the highest ratio in 2022. 2/ Revenues are defined inclusive of grants. 55 Table 1.: External Debt Sustainability Framework, Baseline Scenario, 2009-2032 1/ (In percent of GDP, unless otherwise indicated) 6/ 6/ Actual Historical Standard Projections Average Deviation 2012-2017 2018-2032 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Average 2022 2032 Average External debt (nominal) 1/ 71.5 70.5 65.9 19.0 17.9 18.3 14.8 13.4 13.0 16.3 9.7 o/w public and publicly guaranteed (PPG) 71.5 70.5 65.9 19.0 17.9 18.3 14.8 13.4 13.0 16.3 9.7 Change in external debt -6.0 -1.0 -4.5 -46.9 -1.2 0.4 -3.5 -1.4 -0.4 0.6 -1.0 Identified net debt-creating flows 4.9 5.7 3.7 7.3 3.0 4.0 -6.1 -6.8 -5.3 -1.9 0.6 Non-interest current account deficit 9.2 11.6 15.6 5.9 5.9 38.4 39.5 40.6 22.4 5.0 -0.4 2.1 5.5 2.7 Deficit in balance of goods and services 4.3 8.2 17.9 36.2 37.0 36.9 19.7 2.4 -12.9 -11.0 -3.6 Exports 26.5 28.4 30.3 28.1 26.4 28.2 41.4 52.6 60.2 61.3 43.9 Imports 30.8 36.5 48.2 64.3 63.5 65.2 61.1 55.0 47.3 50.3 40.4 Net current transfers (negative = inflow) -5.3 -5.1 -10.4 -6.3 2.7 -5.9 -5.6 -4.6 -4.4 -3.7 -3.2 -2.5 -1.9 -2.4 o/w official 0.0 0.0 -2.2 -0.8 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Other current account flows (negative = net inflow) 10.3 8.6 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.2 7.1 6.2 15.7 15.7 11.0 Net FDI (negative = inflow) -3.0 -2.4 -9.5 -4.3 3.0 -28.9 -35.8 -35.9 -25.7 -9.6 -3.5 -3.8 -4.7 -4.1 Endogenous debt dynamics 2/ -1.3 -3.5 -2.4 -2.3 -0.7 -0.7 -2.8 -2.2 -1.4 -0.2 -0.2 Contribution from nominal interest rate 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 Contribution from real GDP growth 0.2 -1.3 -2.6 -2.8 -0.9 -0.9 -3.0 -2.4 -1.6 -0.4 -0.3 Contribution from price and exchange rate changes -2.2 -3.0 -0.7 … … … … … … … … Residual (3-4) 3/ -10.9 -6.7 -8.2 -54.2 -4.2 -3.6 2.6 5.4 5.0 2.5 -1.6 o/w exceptional financing 0.0 -0.1 -1.3 -37.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PV of external debt 4/ ... ... 37.1 14.9 13.8 13.8 11.0 9.8 9.4 11.8 7.4 In percent of exports ... ... 122.4 53.2 52.2 49.0 26.5 18.6 15.6 19.3 16.9 PV of PPG external debt ... ... 37.1 14.9 13.8 13.8 11.0 9.8 9.4 11.8 7.4 In percent of exports ... ... 122.4 53.2 52.2 49.0 26.5 18.6 15.6 19.3 16.9 In percent of government revenues ... ... 220.8 78.0 68.5 66.7 51.9 48.3 50.6 59.7 29.6 Debt service-to-exports ratio (in percent) 9.8 10.3 14.0 9.4 5.7 5.8 3.7 0.9 0.7 0.8 1.7 PPG debt service-to-exports ratio (in percent) 9.8 10.3 14.0 9.4 5.7 5.8 3.7 0.9 0.7 0.8 1.7 PPG debt service-to-revenue ratio (in percent) 16.1 19.2 25.3 13.7 7.5 7.9 7.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 3.0 Total gross financing need (Billions of U.S. dollars) 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.4 -0.1 -0.4 -0.4 -0.2 0.3 Non-interest current account deficit that stabilizes debt ratio 15.2 12.7 20.1 85.3 40.7 40.2 25.9 6.4 0.0 1.5 6.5 Key macroeconomic assumptions Real GDP growth (in percent) -0.3 1.9 3.9 2.7 1.7 4.8 5.0 5.2 19.9 19.7 14.3 11.5 2.6 3.1 3.6 GDP deflator in US dollar terms (change in percent) 2.9 4.3 0.9 4.5 15.8 6.0 3.4 -5.8 0.9 0.9 3.3 1.4 0.9 1.4 1.1 Effective interest rate (percent) 5/ 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.4 0.3 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.3 1.6 1.4 1.5 Growth of exports of G&S (US dollar terms, in percent) -22.1 13.6 12.1 7.8 14.4 3.0 2.2 5.8 77.5 53.3 35.1 29.5 0.9 1.0 2.7 Growth of imports of G&S (US dollar terms, in percent) -21.2 26.2 38.3 12.5 16.6 48.3 7.2 1.7 13.4 8.8 1.4 13.5 1.5 4.3 3.8 Grant element of new public sector borrowing (in percent) ... ... ... ... ... 39.7 39.7 39.7 39.7 39.7 39.7 39.7 33.4 30.3 31.9 Government revenues (excluding grants, in percent of GDP) 16.2 15.3 16.8 19.2 20.2 20.8 21.1 20.3 18.5 19.8 25.1 21.1 Aid flows (in Billions of US dollars) 7/ 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 o/w Grants 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 o/w Concessional loans 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 Grant-equivalent financing (in percent of GDP) 8/ ... ... ... 5.0 4.4 4.7 3.4 2.0 1.8 0.7 0.0 0.5 Grant-equivalent financing (in percent of external financing) 8/ ... ... ... 72.6 81.8 83.6 84.5 70.9 60.4 43.4 41.2 44.6 Memorandum items: Nominal GDP (Billions of US dollars) 4.6 4.9 5.2 5.7 6.2 6.2 7.5 9.0 10.7 14.3 21.4 Nominal dollar GDP growth 2.6 6.3 4.9 11.1 8.6 -0.9 21.0 20.8 18.1 13.1 3.5 4.5 4.8 PV of PPG external debt (in Billions of US dollars) 1.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.7 1.6 (PVt-PVt-1)/GDPt-1 (in percent) -0.2 0.0 -0.2 -0.6 0.9 1.2 0.2 0.9 -0.4 0.4 Gross workers' remittances (Billions of US dollars) … … … … … … … … … … … PV of PPG external debt (in percent of GDP + remittances) ... ... 37.1 14.9 13.8 13.8 11.0 9.8 9.4 11.8 7.4 PV of PPG external debt (in percent of exports + remittances) ... ... 122.4 53.2 52.2 49.0 26.5 18.6 15.6 19.3 16.9 Debt service of PPG external debt (in percent of exports + remittances) ... ... 14.0 9.4 5.7 5.8 3.7 0.9 0.7 0.8 1.7 Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections. 0 1/ Includes both public and private sector external debt. 2/ Derived as [r - g - Ï?(1+g)]/(1+g+Ï?+gÏ?) times previous period debt ratio, with r = nominal interest rate; g = real GDP growth rate, and Ï? = growth rate of GDP deflator in U.S. dollar terms. 3/ Includes exceptional financing (i.e., changes in arrears and debt relief); changes in gross foreign assets; and valuation adjustments. For projections also includes contribution from price and exchange rate changes. 4/ Assumes that PV of private sector debt is equivalent to its face value. 5/ Current-year interest payments divided by previous period debt stock. 6/ Historical averages and standard deviations are generally derived over the past 10 years, subject to data availability. 7/ Defined as grants, concessional loans, and debt relief. 8/ Grant-equivalent financing includes grants provided directly to the government and through new borrowing (difference between the face value and the PV of new debt). 56 Table 2.Guinea: Sensitivity Analysis for Key Indicators of Public and Publicly Guaranteed External Debt, 2012-2032 (In percent) Projections 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2022 2032 PV of debt-to GDP ratio Baseline 15 14 14 11 10 9 12 7 A. Alternative Scenarios A1. Key variables at their historical averages in 2012-2032 1/ 15 12 9 11 16 19 31 30 A2. New public sector loans on less favorable terms in 2012-2032 2 15 14 15 12 11 11 16 12 B. Bound Tests B1. Real GDP growth at historical average minus one standard deviation in 2013-2014 15 14 15 12 10 10 13 8 B2. Export value growth at historical average minus one standard deviation in 2013-2014 3/ 15 15 19 15 14 13 15 9 B3. US dollar GDP deflator at historical average minus one standard deviation in 2013-2014 15 16 17 13 12 11 14 9 B4. Net non-debt creating flows at historical average minus one standard deviation in 2013-2014 4/ 15 39 64 54 46 41 39 20 B5. Combination of B1-B4 using one-half standard deviation shocks 15 41 70 58 50 45 43 22 B6. One-time 30 percent nominal depreciation relative to the baseline in 2013 5/ 15 19 19 15 14 13 16 10 PV of debt-to-exports ratio Baseline 53 52 49 26 19 16 19 17 A. Alternative Scenarios A1. Key variables at their historical averages in 2012-2032 1/ 53 47 33 27 30 32 51 69 A2. New public sector loans on less favorable terms in 2012-2032 2 53 53 52 29 21 18 25 28 B. Bound Tests B1. Real GDP growth at historical average minus one standard deviation in 2013-2014 53 51 48 26 18 15 19 17 B2. Export value growth at historical average minus one standard deviation in 2013-2014 3/ 53 63 83 46 32 26 29 25 B3. US dollar GDP deflator at historical average minus one standard deviation in 2013-2014 53 51 48 26 18 15 19 17 B4. Net non-debt creating flows at historical average minus one standard deviation in 2013-2014 4/ 53 146 226 130 88 69 64 47 B5. Combination of B1-B4 using one-half standard deviation shocks 53 144 237 136 92 72 67 49 B6. One-time 30 percent nominal depreciation relative to the baseline in 2013 5/ 53 51 48 26 18 15 19 17 PV of debt-to-revenue ratio Baseline 78 68 67 52 48 51 60 30 A. Alternative Scenarios A1. Key variables at their historical averages in 2012-2032 1/ 78 61 44 54 77 105 157 121 A2. New public sector loans on less favorable terms in 2012-2032 2 78 70 70 56 54 60 78 48 B. Bound Tests B1. Real GDP growth at historical average minus one standard deviation in 2013-2014 78 70 71 55 51 54 63 31 B2. Export value growth at historical average minus one standard deviation in 2013-2014 3/ 78 75 91 73 67 68 73 35 B3. US dollar GDP deflator at historical average minus one standard deviation in 2013-2014 78 79 81 63 59 61 72 36 B4. Net non-debt creating flows at historical average minus one standard deviation in 2013-2014 4/ 78 191 308 255 229 223 197 82 B5. Combination of B1-B4 using one-half standard deviation shocks 78 205 335 277 249 243 215 89 B6. One-time 30 percent nominal depreciation relative to the baseline in 2013 5/ 78 95 92 72 67 70 82 41 57 Table 2.Guinea: Sensitivity Analysis for Key Indicators of Public and Publicly Guaranteed External Debt, 2012-2032 (continued) (In percent) Debt service-to-exports ratio Baseline 9 6 6 4 1 1 1 2 A. Alternative Scenarios A1. Key variables at their historical averages in 2012-2032 1/ 9 6 5 4 1 1 1 4 A2. New public sector loans on less favorable terms in 2012-2032 2 9 6 6 4 1 1 1 2 B. Bound Tests B1. Real GDP growth at historical average minus one standard deviation in 2013-2014 9 6 6 4 1 1 1 2 B2. Export value growth at historical average minus one standard deviation in 2013-2014 3/ 9 6 7 5 1 1 1 3 B3. US dollar GDP deflator at historical average minus one standard deviation in 2013-2014 9 6 6 4 1 1 1 2 B4. Net non-debt creating flows at historical average minus one standard deviation in 2013-2014 4/ 9 6 8 6 2 2 3 5 B5. Combination of B1-B4 using one-half standard deviation shocks 9 6 8 6 2 2 3 5 B6. One-time 30 percent nominal depreciation relative to the baseline in 2013 5/ 9 6 6 4 1 1 1 2 Debt service-to-revenue ratio Baseline 14 7 8 7 2 2 2 3 A. Alternative Scenarios A1. Key variables at their historical averages in 2012-2032 1/ 14 8 7 7 3 4 4 7 A2. New public sector loans on less favorable terms in 2012-2032 2 14 7 8 7 2 3 3 4 B. Bound Tests B1. Real GDP growth at historical average minus one standard deviation in 2013-2014 14 8 9 8 3 3 3 3 B2. Export value growth at historical average minus one standard deviation in 2013-2014 3/ 14 7 8 8 3 3 3 4 B3. US dollar GDP deflator at historical average minus one standard deviation in 2013-2014 14 9 10 9 3 3 3 4 B4. Net non-debt creating flows at historical average minus one standard deviation in 2013-2014 4/ 14 7 11 12 6 6 9 9 B5. Combination of B1-B4 using one-half standard deviation shocks 14 8 12 13 7 6 10 9 B6. One-time 30 percent nominal depreciation relative to the baseline in 2013 5/ 14 11 11 10 3 3 3 4 Memorandum item: Grant element assumed on residual financing (i.e., financing required above baseline) 6/ 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections. 1/ Variables include real GDP growth, growth of GDP deflator (in U.S. dollar terms), non-interest current account in percent of GDP, and non-debt creating flows. 2/ Assumes that the interest rate on new borrowing is by 2 percentage points higher than in the baseline., while grace and maturity periods are the same as in the baseline. 3/ Exports values are assumed to remain permanently at the lower level, but the current account as a share of GDP is assumed to return to its baseline level after the shock (implicitly assuming an offsetting adjustment in import levels). 4/ Includes official and private transfers and FDI. 5/ Depreciation is defined as percentage decline in dollar/local currency rate, such that it never exceeds 100 percent. 6/ Applies to all stress scenarios except for A2 (less favorable financing) in which the terms on all new financing are as specified in footnote 2. 58 Table 3.Guinea: Public Sector Debt Sustainability Framework, Baseline Scenario, 2009-2032 (In percent of GDP, unless otherwise indicated) Actual Estimate Projections 5/ Standard 5/ 2012-17 2018-32 Average 2009 2010 2011 Deviation 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Average 2022 2032 Average Public sector debt 1/ 90.1 100.7 76.8 33.0 32.9 32.8 27.6 23.5 21.3 21.4 12.1 o/w foreign-currency denominated 71.5 70.5 65.9 19.0 17.9 18.3 14.8 13.4 13.0 16.3 9.7 Change in public sector debt 0.2 10.6 -23.9 -43.8 -0.2 0.0 -5.3 -4.1 -2.3 0.2 -1.2 Identified debt-creating flows -1.7 11.1 -11.4 -43.5 -0.3 -0.4 -5.5 -4.3 -2.4 0.0 -1.2 Primary deficit 5.0 12.0 -0.6 2.0 4.4 4.0 1.6 -0.2 -0.4 0.0 0.8 1.0 0.5 -0.8 -0.1 Revenue and grants 16.5 15.7 20.3 22.9 23.9 24.9 24.1 21.8 19.5 20.0 25.1 of which: grants 0.4 0.4 3.4 3.7 3.8 4.1 3.0 1.5 1.0 0.2 0.0 Primary (noninterest) expenditure 21.6 27.7 19.6 26.9 25.6 24.7 23.7 21.8 20.3 20.5 24.3 Automatic debt dynamics -6.7 -0.8 -9.5 -10.1 -1.9 -0.2 -5.1 -4.3 -3.2 -0.5 -0.4 Contribution from interest rate/growth differential 0.8 -3.5 -8.0 -4.2 -1.6 -1.6 -5.2 -4.4 -3.0 -0.6 -0.5 of which: contribution from average real interest rate 0.6 -1.8 -4.2 -0.7 -0.1 0.0 0.3 0.2 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 of which: contribution from real GDP growth 0.3 -1.7 -3.8 -3.5 -1.6 -1.6 -5.4 -4.5 -2.9 -0.5 -0.4 Contribution from real exchange rate depreciation -7.5 2.7 -1.5 -5.8 -0.3 1.4 0.1 0.1 -0.2 ... ... Other identified debt-creating flows 0.0 -0.1 -1.3 -37.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Privatization receipts (negative) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recognition of implicit or contingent liabilities 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Debt relief (HIPC and other) 0.0 -0.1 -1.3 -37.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Other (specify, e.g. bank recapitalization) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Residual, including asset changes 1.9 -0.5 -12.4 -0.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 Other Sustainability Indicators PV of public sector debt ... ... 48.0 28.9 28.8 28.4 23.8 20.0 17.6 16.8 9.8 o/w foreign-currency denominated ... ... 37.1 14.9 13.8 13.8 11.0 9.8 9.4 11.8 7.4 o/w external ... ... 37.1 14.9 13.8 13.8 11.0 9.8 9.4 11.8 7.4 PV of contingent liabilities (not included in public sector debt) ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Gross financing need 2/ 9.3 16.7 4.7 7.9 4.4 2.9 2.2 1.3 1.9 1.3 0.1 PV of public sector debt-to-revenue and grants ratio (in percent) … … 237.0 126.2 120.2 114.2 98.6 91.8 90.4 84.2 39.1 PV of public sector debt-to-revenue ratio (in percent) … … 285.7 150.9 142.9 136.9 112.6 98.5 95.3 85.2 39.1 o/w external 3/ … … 220.8 78.0 68.5 66.7 51.9 48.3 50.6 59.7 29.6 Debt service-to-revenue and grants ratio (in percent) 4/ 25.7 30.0 26.5 17.1 11.4 12.4 10.8 6.1 5.8 4.1 3.3 Debt service-to-revenue ratio (in percent) 4/ 26.3 30.7 31.9 20.4 13.5 14.9 12.4 6.5 6.1 4.2 3.3 Primary deficit that stabilizes the debt-to-GDP ratio 4.9 1.3 23.3 47.8 1.8 -0.2 4.8 4.1 3.0 0.2 0.4 Key macroeconomic and fiscal assumptions Real GDP growth (in percent) -0.3 1.9 3.9 2.7 1.7 4.8 5.0 5.2 19.9 19.7 14.3 11.5 2.6 3.1 3.6 Average nominal interest rate on forex debt (in percent) 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.4 0.3 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.3 1.6 1.4 1.5 Average real interest rate on domestic debt (in percent) 5.4 -9.6 -12.6 -3.2 7.5 -4.8 0.2 0.5 2.4 1.8 -0.6 -0.1 -0.4 -1.6 -0.4 Real exchange rate depreciation (in percent, + indicates depreciation) -9.7 3.9 -2.3 1.0 19.6 -9.3 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Inflation rate (GDP deflator, in percent) 6.8 20.2 19.6 17.2 10.3 14.7 6.3 7.4 5.2 5.0 7.4 7.7 4.8 5.3 5.0 Growth of real primary spending (deflated by GDP deflator, in percent) 0.5 0.3 -0.3 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 Grant element of new external borrowing (in percent) ... ... ... … … 39.7 39.7 39.7 39.7 39.7 39.7 39.7 33.4 30.3 ... Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections. 1/ Public sector covers central government; net debt is used. 2/ Gross financing need is defined as the primary deficit plus debt service plus the stock of short-term debt at the end of the last period. 3/ Revenues excluding grants. 4/ Debt service is defined as the sum of interest and amortization of medium and long-term debt. 5/ Historical averages and standard deviations are generally derived over the past 10 years, subject to data availability. 59 Table 4.Guinea: Sensitivity Analysis for Key Indicators of Public Debt 2012-2032 Projections 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2022 2032 PV of Debt-to-GDP Ratio Baseline 29 29 28 24 20 18 17 10 A. Alternative scenarios A1. Real GDP growth and primary balance are at historical averages 29 30 32 33 33 33 38 45 A2. Primary balance is unchanged from 2012 29 30 33 30 28 27 36 56 A3. Permanently lower GDP growth 1/ 29 29 29 24 21 18 20 21 B. Bound tests B1. Real GDP growth is at historical average minus one standard deviations in 2013-2014 29 30 33 28 25 23 27 30 B2. Primary balance is at historical average minus one standard deviations in 2013-2014 29 32 36 30 26 23 21 13 B3. Combination of B1-B2 using one half standard deviation shocks 29 31 35 30 26 24 27 27 B4. One-time 30 percent real depreciation in 2013 29 35 34 28 24 21 19 13 B5. 10 percent of GDP increase in other debt-creating flows in 2013 29 36 35 30 25 22 21 13 PV of Debt-to-Revenue Ratio 2/ Baseline 126 120 114 99 92 90 84 39 A. Alternative scenarios A1. Real GDP growth and primary balance are at historical averages 126 124 126 131 149 165 190 178 A2. Primary balance is unchanged from 2012 126 127 132 126 130 139 180 222 A3. Permanently lower GDP growth 1/ 126 121 115 101 95 95 98 82 B. Bound tests B1. Real GDP growth is at historical average minus one standard deviations in 2013-2014 126 126 129 117 114 118 135 120 B2. Primary balance is at historical average minus one standard deviations in 2013-2014 126 134 145 126 118 116 106 53 B3. Combination of B1-B2 using one half standard deviation shocks 126 130 139 125 121 123 134 109 B4. One-time 30 percent real depreciation in 2013 126 145 138 118 109 106 96 53 B5. 10 percent of GDP increase in other debt-creating flows in 2013 126 148 143 123 115 113 104 52 Debt Service-to-Revenue Ratio 2/ Baseline 17 11 12 11 6 6 4 3 A. Alternative scenarios A1. Real GDP growth and primary balance are at historical averages 17 12 13 13 9 10 8 10 A2. Primary balance is unchanged from 2012 17 11 13 11 7 7 6 10 A3. Permanently lower GDP growth 1/ 17 11 12 11 6 6 4 5 B. Bound tests B1. Real GDP growth is at historical average minus one standard deviations in 2013-2014 17 12 13 12 7 7 5 7 B2. Primary balance is at historical average minus one standard deviations in 2013-2014 17 11 13 12 7 6 5 4 B3. Combination of B1-B2 using one half standard deviation shocks 17 12 13 12 7 7 5 6 B4. One-time 30 percent real depreciation in 2013 17 13 15 14 7 7 5 5 B5. 10 percent of GDP increase in other debt-creating flows in 2013 17 11 13 12 7 6 5 4 Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections. 1/ Assumes that real GDP growth is at baseline minus one standard deviation divided by the square root of the length of the projection period. 2/ Revenues are defined inclusive of grants.