68987 ALBANIA: Secondary and Tertiary Education Policy Brief #2 – How Teachers Teach in Secondary School Classrooms? Ministry of Education and Science The World Bank The current education strategy in Albania places a strong emphasis on improving the overall quality of education. The National Education Strategy 2005-2015 and other related education policy documents address several elements of education which have direct or indirect links to teaching and student learning. The renewed emphasis on the quality of education reflects the emerging reality that Albanian society and economy is closely interconnected to Europe where student and labor mobility is increasing. Albania supports Lisbon Strategy which aims at improving competitiveness of Europe and emphasizes developing skills, attitudes and values together with traditional knowledge. Schools and teachers are expected to create an environment where not only knowledge is imparted but also entrepreneurships, life skills and the attitude for learning to learn are cultivated. In this context, understanding what students are learning is important as Albania carried out a number of students assessment, did and will participate in PISA 2000 and 2009. It is equally important to understand how teachers actually teach to inform policies and strategies. This policy brief examines how teachers teach and how classrooms are organized in secondary schools in Albania, and highlight issues for consideration. The study used the Flanders Interaction Analysis Categories (FIAC) system which is commonly used in analyzing teaching and learning patterns. A total of 34 randomly selected schools participated in this study and 303 first- year secondary school classes were observed by the 15 observers. The number of tallies registered was 214,914, which totals to 644,742 seconds or 179 hours of observation. The study covered 28 villages or cities in 14 regions and 20 different subject hours were observed. Nearly all teachers whose lessons were observed were formally qualified teachers representing all or most subjects that are taught in secondary schools in Albania. Key findings Teachers in Albania talk more than 70 percent of lesson time. The overall finding regarding the style of teaching in the first grade of secondary school in Albania is that classroom interaction is highly dominated by teacher’s talk. Teachers spent more than 70 percent of time speaking, and 53.5 percent of observed time lecturing. Figure 1 provides an overview to the classroom interaction in the first year of secondary schools in Albania. Figure 1. Percentage of classroom interaction types in the first year of secondary schools in Albania (N=303) ,Student talk initiation ,Silence of confusion ,Student talk response 1.1% 6.0% 22.4% Teacher accepts feelings, 0.1% Teacher accepts/uses students' ideas, 0.4% Teacher praises or encourages, 1.4% Teacher lectures, 53.5% Teacher criticizes or justifies authority, 1.8% Teacher gives directions, 3.1% ,Teacher asks questions 10.2% In a typical 45 minute lesson in Albania, teachers’ talk occupies 32 minutes, students’ responses to teachers’ questions take up 10 minutes, and only 30 seconds are for students’ talk with their own initiatives. Typically, teacher’s talk occupies 32 minutes of the lesson, and it includes 23 minutes lecturing, 5 minutes asking questions and 4 minutes of other talk. In a lesson, 13 minutes is left for anything else. Out of this remaining time, students’ talk takes 10.5 minutes and 2.5 minutes are for silence. A closer look at students talk shows that 10 minutes go to students responding teacher’s questions and only 30 seconds are left to students’ initiatives, i.e. students’ questions, ideas or comments that are related to the learning task. These 30 seconds is the total time for all students’ initiated talk in one lesson. It is rare that students ask questions to the teacher or to each other. It is even more uncommon that students make suggestions or give ideas. These findings confirm the commonly-held assumption that in the classrooms students are in the role of recipient and only very few of them ever have a chance to play a more active role in learning. Figure 2 illustrates the average distribution of how the time is spent in a 45 minutes class. Figure 2. Actual time spent on teacher talk and student talk in one 45-minute lesson A typical 45-minute lesson Initiative 30 second Lecturing Other talk Response 10 minutes Teachers talk Students talk 32 minutes 10.5 minutes Silence 2.5 minutes Although there is no systematically collected data of the types of responses students give to teachers’ questions, classroom observers noted that vast majority questions from teachers require routine response and normally have only one right answer. This, together with the large amount of time spent on lecturing and receiving information suggests that students experience intellectually and socially closed learning environment that has only a limited space for anything else such as team work or independent thinking. Teachers teach the same way throughout Albania; the interaction patterns observed in the classrooms are consistent across the different schools and regions. Sometimes it is assumed that students in urban schools have better access to a more dynamic learning environment than their peers in rural schools. According to this study, there is no significant difference in how teachers teach between urban and rural secondary schools. Presentation-recitation pedagogy is a phenomenon that characterizes not only some schools or some teachers but it is a norm in all Albanian secondary schools. Furthermore, data shows that there is only a minimal amount of independent work (students working silently on their tasks) or small group work (students working with each other in small groups) in Albanian secondary school classrooms. Teachers teach in a similar way regardless of the size of the classrooms. Urban secondary schools are much larger and thus tend to have a larger class-size. In the sample of this study the average class-size was 37.8 with the standard deviation of 8.1. There is no statistically significant correlation between the class-size and the mode of instruction. Teachers teach in similar ways in small or large classes. For example, there were 20 classes with 24 or fewer students. Even in these classrooms teachers taught in a similar way to those teachers who had twice or three times as many students in their classes. Teachers teach information and communication technologies by talking. The overall finding is that the interaction structure in all subjects taught in Albanian secondary school follows the similar pattern: teacher’s talk dominates all lessons. However, a closer look offers some interesting variations. Subjects that by their nature should have clear allocation to practical learning - information and communication technologies (ICT), chemistry and physics – employs the highest portion of time for teachers’ talk. Almost 80 percent of teaching of ICT is teacher talk, and three quarters of ICT lessons are spent on teachers’ lectures. Teachers talk about 36 minutes in a 45-mintues ICT lesson. This may be partially or largely because of the lack of computer laboratories in schools. Table 1 shows the allocation of time by subject. Table 1. Classroom interaction patterns across secondary school subjects as percentage of lesson time. Teacher talk (%) Student talk (%) Subject Direct Indirect Total Response Initiation Total influence influence Albanian language 56.0 12.3 68.3 20.8 0.7 21.5 Biology 52.0 13.8 65.8 26.9 0.9 27.8 Chemistry 60.4 14.5 74.9 19.3 1.5 20.8 Foreign language 55.0 12.0 67.0 26.0 0.9 26.9 Geography 53.8 13.6 67.4 25.4 0.8 26.2 History 53.7 13.3 67.0 27.3 1.9 29.2 IT 74.5 5.1 79.6 13.1 0.6 13.7 Literature 50.8 13.6 64.4 29.6 1.2 30.8 Mathematics 68.7 9.9 78.6 13.6 1.2 14.8 Physics 62.8 11.8 74.6 18.1 1.3 19.4 Sociology 52.3 12.9 65.2 29.0 1.0 30.0 Technology 64.5 7.4 71.9 18.2 0.6 18.8 Classrooms in Albania have a traditional column-and-row setting. This study also observed the overall classroom arrangement, and most of the classrooms are set up with a traditional seating arrangement. There were only a handful of classrooms that had other seating arrangement than the column-and-row setting. These few classrooms were language classes, ICT rooms or laboratories. There were practically no regular classrooms that had an alternative seating arrangement such as students sitting in teams. There were no organized periods of cooperative learning neither in pairs or larger smaller groups in these schools. This reinforces the finding that the presentation-recitation mode is a dominant format of teaching. The classrooms are not in good condition in Albania. There are serious issues related to lighting, heating and ventilation in schools. According to this study, 39 percent of classrooms visited had either poor or missing lighting that in big part of school year affects negatively on teaching and learning. Poor or missing heating was found in 72.5 percent of classrooms and 37.6 percent had similar shortages in ventilation. One of every six classrooms had also poor quality student desks and problems with the blackboard. On average classrooms were assessed to be average although the number of poor or very poor classrooms is alarming. Implications for policies and strategies This study shows that teaching in Albanian secondary schools is dominated by teachers talk and that students are in a passive role in classrooms. It also shows that the classroom setting is traditional, and the physical conditions are rather poor. According to contemporary research, schools matter. 1 If schools are organized for learning and teachers have opportunities to continuous professional development, schools can have an effect on students learning regardless of their socio-economic background. Knowledge society expects citizens in general and productive work force in particular to continue learning, use knowledge critically, work in teams and generate new knowledge. 1. There is a need to rethink how teachers teach, and make teachers aware of limitations of traditional ways of teaching. All major education strategies – national and international – call for more active role of students. Students’ active role means that they ask more questions, initiate more ideas, take more lead of their own learning and engage more in team learning with other students. While there is no benchmark or such as to what proportion of time should be spent on teachers talk versus students talk, the fact that only one percent of the lesson time (or 30 seconds of a 45 minutes lesson) accounts for students’ talk with their own is disconcerting. It may be the case that effectiveness of teaching as measured by quality of learning outcomes can be improved by using traditional presentation-recitation teaching modes in better ways. However, skills and attitudes required in knowledge society and globalizing economy can more effectively be developed in an environment where students talk and take initiatives more than they do now. It is important to recognize that the way 1 Reynolds, D. & Teddlie, C. 2000. An introduction to school effectiveness research. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.) The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer Press. Sammons, P. 1999. School effectiveness. Coming of age in the twenty-first century. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger. teacher teach today will not lead to learning outcomes required in modern knowledge society. A first step is to help teachers understand the limitations of traditional presentation-recitation mode of teaching. 2. Improving quality of student learning requires changes in classroom interaction patterns. Renewing curricula and textbooks and providing schools with new technologies are necessary conditions for education reforms. However, they are not sufficient to bring about sustainable improvement in the quality of teaching and thereby student learning. As long as institutional norms in schools and classrooms remain unchanged, not much improvement in quality of learning outcomes can be expected. One of the main behavioral regularities that characterize Albanian secondary school classrooms today is the dominance of teachers’ talk and a passive role of students as a learner. Efforts should be made to help teachers to change the existing classroom interaction patterns, and this is not simply a matter of increasing in-service training to teachers. Making changes in teaching requires more comprehensive approaches which combine traditional in-service training of teachers, collegial professional development in schools and improving school leadership simultaneously. It is therefore critical to: (1) give a clear priority to developing different methods of teaching in the Albanian context, (2) encourage schools that are willing and able to experiment and develop alternative teaching methods (proposed school grants activity may be instrumental for this purpose), (3) ensure that curriculum and other instruments are well coordinated with the change in teaching methods, and (4) strengthen training capacity at national and regional levels to make trainers available to the schools and teachers. 3. School should be the focus of change, and school principal can play a key role. Teachers are unlikely to change their beliefs about ways of teaching and learning unless schools in which they work change. Improving physical environment is an important, but not a sufficient condition for change. Changing interaction and power relations in classrooms requires changes in institutional norms, knowledge, skills and leadership. There seems to be a firm set of beliefs that good teaching is based on lecturing, asking questions by teachers, and orderly responses by students. If significant changes in classroom interaction patterns are expected, educational administrators including school principals need to understand the influence of school’s institutional norms and be able to change them. The role of school leadership needs to be strengthened by enhancing school principals’ knowledge and skills in productive learning environment. School principals should encourage teachers and students to engage in more cooperation and lateral interaction during classroom activities. 4. It is important to understand what schools and teachers are doing and why. This study shows that although it is not surprising that teachers dominate the classrooms in Albania, there are many aspects of teaching and learning that we do not know enough about. For instance, during the data collection of this study, observers saw some exciting and interesting lessons where teachers were using alternative methods of teaching to engage their students and make learning more attractive. It shows that there are novel ideas in Albanian schools but they are hidden in classrooms and practiced only by a very small number of teachers. Assessing what students have learned is important. Equally, understanding how teachers teach is critical in designing any intervention to improve schools. Education administrators at central and regional levels should: (1) aim at enhancing the knowledge about teaching and learning in schools together with the information about student achievement, (2) support schools and especially school principals to have a more active and systematic role in following how teachers teach in their own schools, and (3) encourage schools and other educational institutions to initiate small-scale research projects which could continually shed light on what is happening in classrooms. Study Method A total of 34 randomly selected schools participated in this study and 303 first-year secondary school classes were observed by the 15 observers between December 2006 and February 2007. The random selection was done using the database of all schools of Albania. Only the first-year of secondary school was chosen for the study. The number of tallies registered in the classroom was 214,914, which totals 644,742 seconds or 179 hours of observation. The study covered 28 villages or cities in 14 regions and 20 different subject hours were observed. Nearly all teachers whose lessons were observed were formally qualified teachers representing all or most subjects that are taught in secondary schools in Albania. Three out of every four teachers were female. For the purposes of this study the regions were informally divided in four groups: Northern Albania, Central Albania, Tirana and Southern Albania. Observations were based on the Flanders Interaction Analysis Categories (FIAC) system that is commonly used in analyzing teaching and learning patterns, especially interaction between teachers and students and among students during typical classroom lessons. It is said to be inclusive of all communication possibilities. There are seven categories used when the teacher is talking and two when the student is talking. Because the system is totally inclusive coding at a constant rate allows calculation of the proportion of time spent in one or more categories. This is the first time that the FIAC is used as a study method in classroom research in Albania. FIAC has two primary uses. Firstly to provide evidence of difference in teaching patterns that distinguishes one curriculum from another. Secondly, it provides data which help to explain why differences in learning outcomes appeared or failed to appear. T A team of 15 observers (psychology students from the University of Tirana) was prepared to collect the data. Each observer was assigned three randomly selected secondary schools. The time when observations were made was centrally coordinated so that all data collection takes place simultaneously in different parts of the country. Observers did not inform schools in advance about which lessons they are about to observe. Instead, the school principal was requested to provide observers with access to the lessons of their choice during the day. Observers filled in data collection grids that record specific interaction patterns during the lessons. They will also made notes about general conditions of the classroom, teaching facilities, physical characteristics and some anecdotal notes regarding classroom behaviors. The FIAC procedure requires that observers make regular notes on interaction in the classroom. In this study observers are recording classroom interaction in every three seconds. This leads to a large amount of data if entire lessons are observed and coded. In order to avoid the overload of data from each lesson, three 6-minute periods of interaction in each lesson was recorded, namely period 6 to 11 minutes, 18 to 23 minutes and 30 to 35 minutes of each lesson. This means that 360 tallies in each lesson were recorded.