PAVING THE WAY 78650 SOUTH SUDAN FOR A SECURE FUTURE 2012 ANNUAL REPORT Multi-Donor Trust Fund for South Sudan Contents Overview 4 Performance achievements 10 Financials 31 Closure and beyond 35 Foreword This will be the final Annual Report for the Multi-Donor Trust Fund for South Sudan (MDTF‑SS), an occasion both to reflect on our unique journey over the last seven years and to look forward. The MDTF‑SS was formed in 2005 to provide reconstruction and development assistance to help the then–Southern States of Sudan. Through a fragile yet hopeful period, the MDTF‑SS has delivered a substantial body of assistance in critical infrastructure, provided essential services, developed a basic framework for public financial management, and supported technical assistance to implement projects and policies supporting a country celebrating its second anniversary on July 9, 2013. We take this opportunity to thank the government of the Republic of South Sudan for its leadership as the largest contributor and implementer of the majority of the 21 MDTF‑SS projects in all 10 states. Of the 12 MDTF‑SS projects active on the first day of 2012, 11 closed by the end of the year. The final project to close, on March 31, 2013, was the Core Fiduciary Systems Support Project, by which time the Fund had a 99 percent disbursement rate. Among the year’s highlights is the completion of the remaining ancillary road works in early 2012 to improve the connectivity of Juba to state capitals, thus extending the reach of businesses and services to previously inaccessible areas. The Education Rehabilitation Project implemented by the Ministry of General Education and Instruction also closed, having built some 336 pri- mary school classrooms, trained more than 1,000 teachers, and distributed more than 2.2 million textbooks to children. The Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation, with MDTF‑SS support, improved access to sanitation and safe water for more than a million citizens. The government- implemented Gender Support and Development Project continued its focus on providing much- needed livelihood training and small grants to empower women in 2012, delivering “the real dividend of peace,� as Minister for Gender, Child, and Social Welfare Agnes Kwaje Lasuba put it. At the MDTF‑SS closing ceremony in Juba on May 28, 2013, Deputy Minister for Finance and Economic Planning Mary Jervas Yak acknowledged the important contributions of the MDTF‑SS, including the building of government institutions and capacity to manage future development projects. The mood was nostalgic as donors recounted their experiences and beneficiaries shared their testimonies of the benefits of MDTF‑SS support. All agreed that the closing of the MDTF‑SS paved the way for continuing support from the interna- tional community. For example, the World Bank prepared an Interim Strategy Note in 2012 to detail the development support that it would extend to South Sudan, its newest member. The note focused on supporting prudent economic management, job creation, capacity building, and infrastructure. I close by thanking the government of the Republic of South Sudan and our generous partners and stakeholders who have served the people of South Sudan over the years through the MDTF‑SS. Berhane Manna World Bank Acting Country Manager Republic of South Sudan 1 South Sudan at a glance South Sudan is a landlocked country in East Africa, bordered by six countries: Ethiopia to the east; Central African Republic to the west; Kenya, Uganda, and the Democratic Republic of Congo to the south; and the Republic of the Sudan to the north. At 644,329 square kilometers, South Sudan is roughly the size of France, but with just under an eighth the population. Its population density is less than a tenth that of neighboring Uganda. More than 80 percent of South Sudan’s 8.3 million residents live in rural areas. With more than 200 ethnic groups spread out across such a vast area, South Sudan is fostering a sense of shared nation- hood. Almost 75 percent of South Sudanese were born after the second civil war started in 1983, and half the population is under 18 years of age. The young population’s only experience of peace is in the years since the Comprehensive Peace Agreement was signed in 2005. South Sudan has vast and largely untapped natural resources. Oil accounts for almost all exports and for around 80 percent of gross domestic product, either directly or indirectly. South Sudan’s oil depen- dence is higher than any other country. Despite the country’s abundant natural resources, its human development indicators are among the world’s lowest. South Sudan has the highest maternal mortality ratio in the world—2,054 deaths per five mortality rate—121 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2011—has fallen 100,000 live births. The under-­ for several years but remains above the Sub-Saharan average of 108. Life expectancy at birth for a South Sudanese is 62 years, compared with the Sub-Saharan average of 68. The prevalence of tubercu- losis and HIV/AIDS each exceed 200 per 100,000 inhabitants, above the Sub-Saharan averages of 170 for tuberculosis and 113 for HIV/AIDS. Upper Nile Northern Unity Bahr el Ghazal Warrap Western Bahr el Ghazal Jonglei Lakes Western Equatoria Eastern Equatoria Central Equatoria 2 SOUTH SUDAN About the Multi-Donor Trust Fund for South Sudan Sudan’s Comprehensive Peace Agreement, signed in January 2005, called for the creation of two multi-donor trust funds, one for the national government (Sudan Na- tional Multi-Donor Trust Fund, or MDTF-N) and one for Southern Sudan (MDTF-SS), as part of the wealth-sharing protocol. The trust funds were of cially established fol- lowing the Oslo donor conference in April 2005 and became effective four months later in August 2005. Southern Sudan became South Sudan after independence in July 2011. Mission The MDTF-SS supports the government of the Republic of South Sudan in imple- menting various aspects of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement to rebuild and develop the 10 states of South Sudan. Investments aim to help the poorest and bring about lasting peace, while ensuring government ownership, transparency, and scal accountability. Approach An Oversight Committee, chaired by the government of the Republic of South Sudan and co-chaired by the Joint Donor Team, allocates funds. The World Bank, United Nations, and major donors all sit on the committee. Projects funded are mostly implemented by the government, with a few assigned to United Nations agencies. Contributors The government of the Republic of South Sudan is the lead contributor to the MDTF-SS. The Netherlands, Norway, United Kingdom, Canada, and European Com- mission, in that order, contributed 80 percent of donor funds. Sweden, Finland, Spain, Germany, Denmark, the World Bank, Iceland, Italy, and Egypt contributed the balance. The World Bank’s role The MDTF-SS is administered by the World Bank, which carries the sole duciary responsibility through a technical secretariat in Juba. 1 Overview South Sudan is turning the corner as it settles border and trade disputes with its northern neighbor, while reinforcing the long-awaited peace dividend through targeted development efforts led by the government. The year 2012 was South Sudan’s first full calendar year as a sovereign and independent nation. In January of that year, the nation celebrated the first anniversary of its peaceful referendum for independence. Despite having a rich resource base, South Sudan entered statehood as one of the world’s least developed countries, having had no previous control over the proceeds of its resources. At least half of the 8.3 million South Sudanese are poor, living on less than $1.25 a day. When the Multi-Donor Trust Fund for Southern Sudan (MDTF‑SS) was cre- ated in 2005, after more than five decades of civil war, Southern Sudan had no history of formal and accepted institutions, rules, or administration. It had virtually no water infrastructure or paved roads, and structures for ser- vice delivery were practically nonexistent. The MDTF‑SS grew out of a collaborative process with international part- ners. “The MDTF‑SS was not [created] in a vacuum or out of the blue,� said Eng. Isaac Liabwel C. Yol, Undersecretary in the Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation, in a recent interview. “It was based on the Joint Assessment Mission, which identified the needs of South Sudan and the financial gaps. So, the MDTF‑SS was set up as an intervention by donors to supplement what we were forecasting as revenue for the southern envelope for reconstruction and development.� The objectives were to coordinate and harmonize international assistance, to preserve scarce capacity, and to launch key programs. Since its inception, the MDTF‑SS has served as one of the primary support mechanisms for re- constructing and developing South Sudan. 4 SOUTH SUDAN The MDTF‑SS closes at the end of June 2013, having delivered the largest The MDTF‑SS single package of development assistance to the people of South Sudan since closes at the end of 2005. It made substantial contributions to: June 2013, having • Peace building by providing technical assistance and capacity building delivered the largest for the police to strengthen security, law, and order and to reintegrate single package ex-combatants. of development • State building by facilitating the country’s ongoing transition to a assistance to the development-­ oriented economy by building its social, political, and tech- people of South nical capital. Sudan since 2005 • Partnership deepening by providing a platform for mobilizing national and international development partnerships. The MDTF‑SS also served as one of the platforms to support the government and its partners with early engagement on how to implement the New Deal for Engagement in Fragile States, a peace- and state-building initiative that the international community endorsed in 2011, with South Sudan identified as a New Deal pilot country. The government leads the rebuilding of South Sudan In all, the government and donor partners committed $718 million to 21 proj- ects in 10 states (figure 1). The selected investments aimed to help the poor- est and bring about lasting peace, while ensuring government ownership, transparency, and fiscal accountability. The initial closing date for MDTF‑SS projects was June 30, 2011, but the gov- ernment applied for a 12-month extension to June 30, 2012, to ensure com- pletion of Phase II projects (begun after a midterm review and the imple- mentation of a new strategy). At the beginning of 2012, after realizing that 10 projects had ongoing activities likely to extend longer than six months, the government applied for a second extension until December 31, 2012, which the Oversight Committee agreed to. By March 31, 2013, 99 percent of the funds committed to development projects had been disbursed. MDTF‑SS accomplishments reflect the government’s hard work and dedica- tion to its people, in collaboration with the United Nations and World Bank, nongovernmental organizations, and MDTF‑SS donors. Faced with the need 5 Figure 1. MDTF‑SS donor contributions and portfolio highlights Total available donor and government As of December 31, 2012 of South Sudan funding through 2012 Denmark 1% amounted to $726.6 million. World Bank 1% Germany 2% Othersa 1% • Grant commitments to projects stood Spain 2% at $717.6 million ($539.6 million Finland 4% by donors and $178.0 million by the government). Sweden • The amount disbursed to projects 5% Government of South Sudan totaled $709.1 million ($530.5 million 25% European by donors and $178.6 million by the Commission government). 8% • Project expenditure was $699.0 million Canada ($524.3 million by donors and 8% $174.7 million by the government) Netherlands • The disbursed donor funds represented United 21% 96.7 percent of paid-in funds by donors Kingdom 10% and 97.7 percent of funds committed Norway to projects. 13% a. Egypt, Iceland, and Italy. to build the country from scratch, the government led the MDTF‑SS efforts to build hostels, hospitals, classrooms, and government offices—and to estab- lish 18 ministries. This effort provided youth with employment in the con- struction industry. The rapid expansion of towns and institutions continues to offer more job opportunities, including many in the private sector. To sup- port this growth, more than 2,400 kilometers of roads have been rehabili- tated, repaired, or maintained, connecting Juba to some state capitals, and another 1,960 kilometers of feeder roads have been designed by the Ministry of Roads and Bridges under the MDTF‑SS (box 1). Enhancing human resources Education and health care play a major role in a country’s human develop- ment. With MDTF‑SS support, the government and its partners rehabilitated or built 336 classrooms, set up libraries and auxiliary units, and trained more than 1,000 teachers. The MDTF‑SS also supported the provision of 2.2 mil- lion textbooks to primary school students and manuals to 8,000 teachers. Empowering women and men, in war and peace South Sudanese women have endured decades of losing husbands, sons, and brothers amid the atrocities of war. Many men who survived returned home 6 SOUTH SUDAN Box 1. Highlights of MDTF‑SS achievements by Joint Assessment Mission framework cluster Institutional development and capacity building • Trained more than 1,200 government personnel. Rule of law and governance • Trained 6,500 police station staff. Economic policy and management • Introduced a new currency, which benefited business people and consumers by reducing the transac- tion costs of commercial activities. Productive sectors • Vaccinated more than 580,000 animals and treated nearly 330,000 for diseases. Basic social services • Education— Supplied 2.2 million textbooks to children. • Health— Distributed medical supplies to 1,300 clinics and hospitals. • Water and sanitation— Provided 1 million people with access to safe water and sanitation facilities. • HIV/AIDS— Provided HIV/AIDS counseling and testing services to more than 80,000 people. Infrastructure • Rehabilitated and repaired more than 2,400 kilometers of roads linking Juba to state capitals. Livelihoods and social protection • Served 7,600 women through economic-activity programs. Information and monitoring • Conducted a nationwide census over 2007–09, South Sudan’s first since 1956. To view a three-minute video, South Sudan: Building a Nation for a Secure Future, visit www.worldbank.org/ en/news/video/2013/05/28/south-sudan-building-a-nation-for-a-secure-future. physically maimed and emotionally scarred. Sporadic outbreaks of violence in border areas remain a concern. Law enforcement continues to improve through an MDTF‑SS program for disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration—which has helped 30,000 ex-combatants. The MDTF‑SS Police and Prisons Projects also helped in- crease law enforcement capacity. South Sudan’s women are now seizing the opportunity to rebuild their lives and the nation. Through the MDTF‑SS, more than 108 women’s groups have been provided $3.7 million for various economic activities. 7 Through the “These awards mark the beginning of their peace dividends and more to come,� said Minister for Gender, Child, and Social Welfare Agnes Kwaje MDTF‑SS, more Lasuba. than 108 women’s groups have been provided $3.7 million Obstacles overcome along the journey for various economic activities The most important factor influencing MDTF‑SS project implementation in 2012 was the government’s austerity measures following the suspension of oil production in January because of a protracted dispute with the Republic of the Sudan over transshipment fees. The measures included a 26 percent spending cut across the board (except military spending) and went into effect in May 2012. While widely credited with staving off a severe fiscal crisis, the measures se- verely constrained the state’s resources and its ability to deliver public goods and services. Government institutions faced increasing difficulty in using and sustaining MDTF‑SS assets. Annual inflation peaked at roughly 80 percent in mid-2012, greatly affect- ing MDTF‑SS project implementation and budgets. In addition, the South Sudanese pound depreciated sharply in the middle of 2012, impeding the MDTF‑SS’s ability to adhere to project budgets for goods and services. With the adoption of the 2012/13 austerity budget, the authorities reduced nominal expenditure by 30 percent compared with the 2011/12 budget. The reduc- tion contributed to stabilizing the exchange rate and holding inflation below 20 percent by May 2013. The oil shutdown has, however, affected the economy. The World Bank estimates that gross domestic product declined about 55 percent in 2012. Although Sudan and South Sudan signed an agreement in March 2013 to resume oil exports, the situation remains uncertain. With oil revenues still unavailable to fund South Sudan’s budget, austerity spending levels for 2012/13 will continue for at least the first half of the next fiscal year (July–December 2013), according to the Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning. Even so, several MDTF‑SS projects that previously had disbursement lags or long-standing unresolved issues picked up momentum in 2012. As of Decem- ber 31, 2012, the Education Rehabilitation Project had disbursed $45.9 mil- lion, 100 percent of committed funds, and the Water Supply and Sanitation 8 SOUTH SUDAN Project had disbursed $24.5 million, 82 percent of committed funds. And Going forward, the Sudan Emergency Transport and Infrastructure Development Project the government had settled all long-pending claims on the rehabilitation and construction of buildings. plans to build on the basic services, security, and good Resilient nation maintains results-focused momentum governance achieved under the MDTF‑SS, with bilateral and Going forward, the government plans to build on the basic services, secu- rity, and good governance achieved under the MDTF‑SS, with bilateral and multilateral support multilateral support. In April 2012, the Republic of South Sudan became the newest member of the World Bank Group, when Minister of Finance and Economic Planning Kosti Manibe Ngai signed the Bank’s Articles of Agreement and Conventions in Washington, DC. “Even before we became members, the World Bank was already collaborat- ing closely with us,� said Ngai. “So, today we are very pleased that the for- malities have finally been completed, and we look forward to a long-term partnership with the World Bank Group as we work together on the much- needed development of South Sudan.� In addition to becoming a member of the International Bank of Reconstruc- tion and Development and the International Development Association, South Sudan joined the International Finance Corporation, the International Cen- tre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, and the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency. Obiageli Ezekwesili, the World Bank’s Vice President for Africa, said, “South Sudan is a test case for the ideas in our World Development Report 2011: Con- flict, Security, and Development, which emphasizes the leadership role of citizens . . . in peace- and state-building solutions, with the support of their international development partners. The World Bank is strongly committed to this approach in South Sudan.� In April 2013, at the South Sudan Economic Partners Forum in Washington, DC, the international community renewed its commitment for long-term en- gagement with South Sudan to support inclusive political governance, public accountability, effective social services, and a vibrant private sector. 9 2 Performance achievements In an independent review that started in November 2012, evaluators identified a large body of outputs delivered through the MDTF‑SS across a wide geographic area and under difficult conditions. A preliminary finding was that most outputs were achieved after 2010, when MDTF‑SS disbursements accelerated. According to stakeholder interviews in 2012–13, beneficiaries in state institutions and communities appreciated the MDTF‑SS’s contributions, considering them relevant to their needs despite the various implementation challenges encountered along the way. The independent evaluation reviewed the MDTF‑SS’s performance against five original strategic priority areas: • Establish an effective core of public sector administration, including core capacity to plan and finance government programs with key accountabil- ity mechanisms in place. • Prepare selected investments to consolidate peace and generate social capital through access to basic services with a rapid scale-up of educa- tion programs. • Put priority sector programs in place, including basic infrastructure (roads, electricity, and water), education, and health. • Support preparation of programs, including agriculture and private sec- tor development, to facilitate the transition from subsistence-based liveli- hoods to a development-oriented economy. • Harmonize international development assistance to South Sudan. The majority of MDTF‑SS resources were allocated to basic service deliv- ery and infrastructure, where the need was most immediate (figure 2). The MDTF‑SS also supported development-oriented activities designed to yield 10 SOUTH SUDAN Figure 2. MDTF actual expenditure by sector Capacity building for public administration and planning $64.6 million Livelihoods $67.0 million Basic infrastructure Stabilization (roads, water, and security and sanitation) $72.8 million $302.9 million Human development (health and education) $204.7 million longer term benefits as the South Sudanese increased their ability to earn a living through farming or commerce. Rate of disbursements accelerated The lifespan of the MDTF‑SS can be divided into two disbursement phases: Phase I, which dates from its inception, and Phase II, when disbursements accelerated starting in early 2010, after a midterm review and the implemen- tation of a turnaround strategy (figure 3). Low disbursement rates characterized Phase I: project commitments and disbursements lagged behind donor deposits until 2009. By the end of 2008— three years into implementation—only about 35 percent of the available funds had been disbursed. A number of stakeholders expressed a view that the MDTF‑SS expectations were perhaps too ambitious. “There was a great deal of excitement around the launch of the Trust Fund,� said Honor Flanagan, head of the Joint Donor Team and co-chair of the Over- sight Committee. “It was the gathering of a lot of momentum and energy 11 Figure 3. Milestones in Trust Fund disbursements, January 2006–March 2013 As of March 31, 2013 ($ millions) 750 717 682 Total disbursements 713 579 647 Total expenditures 479 503 536 539 500 443 400 379 Donor disbursements 300 341 250 185 200 179 179 179 179 179 Republic of 100 South Sudan disbursements 85 86 0 Jan. Oct. Dec. May Dec. Mar. Mar. 2006 2007 2009 2010 2010 2012 2013 around really helping Southern Sudan, as it was [known] at the time, to es- tablish its own government and its own institutions. So, there was an incred- ible amount of expectation, I think, at the beginning, maybe too much in fact—a very broad and ambitious canvas of activities was to take place.� The midterm review found that slow disbursement was due at least partly to: • Fledgling government human resource capacity. • Inadequate procurement systems. • Initially limited understanding of World Bank standard procurement processes. • Ongoing insecurity in some states. • Inaccessibility due to the poor road network. Over 2008–09, the government, the World Bank, donors, and other MDTF‑SS stakeholders met to determine how to improve performance. The group de- vised a turnaround strategy that called for a stepped-up pace in disburse- ments, more realistic project objectives and targets, additional technical 12 SOUTH SUDAN support for project implementation and procurement, and enhanced moni- The MDTF‑SS toring and evaluation at both the project and portfolio levels. Based on rec- achieved a ommendations of the Country Portfolio Performance Review (2009), the MDTF‑SS’s new strategy was outlined in Multi-­ Donor Trust Fund for South- 99 percent ern Sudan: Taking Stock and a Way Forward (2010). disbursement rate by closure, yielding The revised strategy also waived, in response to the government’s request, the government’s contribution as a prerequisite for disbursement to proj- large socioeconomic ects. The government was unable to sustain its commitment of two dollars and capacity-building for every one dollar from donors due in part to the global oil price decline benefits for South in 2008–09, which led to a substantial revenue slump. Following Oversight Committee approval in 2009, project grant agreements did not include a gov- Sudan’s people ernment contribution (see figure 3). Based on the turnaround strategy, expenditure rates of all ongoing projects accelerated in Phase II, which consequently increased disbursements. Initia- tives such as the 100-day Rapid Results Education Initiative were launched to expedite realization of outputs through faster implementation of project activities. The new strategy proved effective: more than 60 percent of total disburse- ments were made during the last three years of the MDTF‑SS implementa- tion period. Ultimately, the strategy resulted in a 99 percent disbursement rate as of March 31, 2013, yielding large socioeconomic and capacity-build- ing benefits for South Sudan’s people. The government boosts its capacity to lead Although the government’s financial contributions leveled off at the mid- point, it continued to be the largest single MDTF‑SS contributor, leading decisionmaking and project implementation. Many informants recalled that “there was no government� when the MDTF‑SS was launched. The newly formed, semi-­ autonomous government of Southern Sudan did not have basic infrastructure, legal or regulatory frameworks, or human resources to de- liver public goods and services. From this baseline, the state’s institutional capacity has gradually expanded, most pronounced at the center but extending to the state and lower levels as well, according to an independent assessment. While capacity building has been enhanced by other international sources, the MDTF‑SS—with the 13 Projects in 2012 government in the lead—has played an essential and catalytic role. According to a stakeholder survey in 2012–13, building institutional capacity emerged focused on as a top area of MDTF‑SS performance. further expanding access to clean Capacity building was a cross-cutting priority of the MDTF‑SS, embedded in the design and implementation of all projects through three key components: water, education, and health and • Investing in physical infrastructure. supporting agriculture • Enhancing human resources. development as a potential means • Establishing and strengthening institutional systems and structures. of livelihood At the state level, the MDTF‑SS funded construction of government office buildings, trained officials, and facilitated systems development. Train- ing covered financial management systems as well as management and job skills. While some capacity-building activities were delayed or con- strained due to the 2012 austerity measures, MDTF‑SS contributions were important in sustaining the core functions of institutions. Evaluators found capacity and systems still in place and part of the essential institu- tional core that the government is attempting to preserve until revenues resume. 2012 projects The cumulative outputs of the MDTF‑SS’s 21 projects across all 10 states of South Sudan have been impressive (see annex 1). Twelve projects were ac- tive at the beginning of 2012; the rest had closed in 2011 or earlier (table 1). This section examines only projects active in 2012. Overall, 2012 was a slower year for the MDTF‑SS, as projects were winding down. Projects in 2012 focused on further expanding access to clean water, education, and health and supporting agriculture development as a poten- tial means of livelihood. In addition, construction progressed on the three remaining national government buildings: the National Audit Chamber and the South Sudan Anti-Corruption Commission buildings under the Rapid Impact Emergency Project, as well as the Ministry of Gender, Child, and Social Welfare headquarters under the Gender Support and Development Project. 14 SOUTH SUDAN Table 1. Project closures, January 1, 2012, through March 31, 2013 Joint Assessment Mission framework cluster Project Closure date Institutional development Core Fiduciary Support Systems Project March 31, 2013 and capacity building Rapid Impact Emergency Projecta December 31, 2012 Capacity Building, Institutional and Before 2012 Human Resource Development Rule of law and governance Police and Prisons I Before 2012 Police and Prisons II Before 2012 Economic policy and Sudan New Currency Project Before 2012 management Productive sectors Gender Support Development Project December 31, 2012 Support to Agriculture and Forestry December 31, 2012 Development Project Private Sector Development Project June 30, 2012 Livestock and Fisheries Development Project Before 2012 Basic social services Education Rehabilitation Project December 31, 2012 (education, health, Umbrella Programme for Health December 31, 2012 water and sanitation, Systems Development II and HIV/AIDS) Water Supply and Sanitation Project December 31, 2012 HIV/AIDS Project September 30, 2012 Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Project Before 2012 Umbrella Programme for Health I Before 2012 Infrastructure Roads Maintenance Project August 31, 2012 Sudan Emergency Transport and June 30, 2012 Infrastructure Development Project Livelihoods and Disarmament, Demobilisation and December 31, 2012 social protection Reintegration Programme Information and monitoring Census I Before 2012 Census II Before 2012 a. Prior to 2012, the Rapid Impact Emergency Project contributed to two other Joint Assessment Mission framework clusters­— basic social services and infrastructure—in addition to institutional development and capacity building. Note: Darker shaded framework clusters and projects were active for at least part of 2012. Lighter shaded framework clusters and projects in italics were closed before 2012. Projects that closed in 2012 fell under five of the eight clusters in the Joint Assessment Mission framework: • Institutional development and capacity building. The Core Fiduciary Support Systems Project closed on March 31, 2013 (having remained open to enable it to complete all MDTF‑SS project audits). The Rapid Impact Emergency Project closed on December 31. 15 Supplying residents • Productive sectors. The Private Sector Development Project and the Sudan Emergency Transport and Infrastructure Development Project of South Sudan with both closed on June 30. The Gender Support and Development Project access to clean and the Support to Agriculture and Forestry Development Project, both water remained a closed on December 31. top MDTF‑SS priority • Basic social services. The HIV/AIDS Project closed on September 30. The through the end of Education Rehabilitation Project, the Umbrella Programme for Health 2012, when the Water Systems Development II, and the Water Supply and Sanitation Project all closed on December 31. Supply and Sanitation Project closed • Infrastructure. The Roads Maintenance Project closed on August 31. • Livelihoods and social protection. The Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reintegration Programme closed on December 31. Projects under the other three clusters—rule of law and governance, econom- ic policy and management, and information and monitoring—closed prior to 2012. Water Supply and Sanitation Project Supplying residents of South Sudan with access to clean water remained a top MDTF‑SS priority through the end of 2012, when the Water Supply and Sanitation Project closed. 16 SOUTH SUDAN South Sudan’s substantial water resources are unevenly distributed and The Water Supply vary greatly depending on the season, oscillating between periodic floods and Sanitation and droughts. Annual rainfall ranges from 400 to 1,600 millimeters, with northern areas receiving the least. Project increased access to safe water Only 34 percent of South Sudanese have access to clean water. Many villag- and sanitation in all ers walk 30 minutes or more to the closest water source, which likely does not yield safe drinking water. Access to appropriate sanitary facilities is es- states for more than timated at around 30 percent—higher in cities and towns and much lower in 1 million people by rural areas. Most of these facilities are in very poor condition due to lack of helping the Ministry maintenance during the war. of Water Resources The lack of clean water leads to diseases such as bacterial and protozoan and Irrigation build diarrhea, hepatitis A and E, and typhoid fever—all transmitted by consuming a sustainable food or water contaminated by feces. A July 2012 outbreak of acute diarrhea killed dozens in South Sudan’s Unity state. By some estimates, 2 out of 10,000 management system children died every day, and in one week alone, 23 deaths were blamed on and develop more diarrhea. Lacking widespread access to clean water, South Sudan leads the world in cases of Guinea worm disease (dracunculiasis ), a parasitic infection knowledge on contracted when people ingest drinking water from stagnant sources. While water resources globally the disease had been nearly eradicated by January 2012, 96 percent of the world’s remaining cases were reportedly in South Sudan at that time. The Water Supply and Sanitation Project increased access to safe water and sanitation in all states for more than 1 million people by helping the Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation build a sustainable management system and develop more knowledge on water resources. The MDTF‑SS expanded rural access to safe water and latrines, including in some schools and health facilities. It also conducted outreach to increase awareness about improved hygiene and build capacity in community-based water management. 17 The Water Supply and According to a program beneficiary, James Bukassa, “We used to walk for six miles to collect water from the river. We used to suffer from abdominal pain, Sanitation Project’s coughs, headaches, and other waterborne infections. But after the MDTF‑SS activities in 2012 brought us boreholes, the children look much healthier and we drink clean centered on finishing water. We give thanks to our government for bringing us clean drinking water. We are happy.� the construction and rehabilitation The program’s activities in 2012 centered on finishing the construction and of water distribution rehabilitation of water distribution systems. The biggest accomplishment was the completion of Lui Water Supply and Distribution System, roughly systems. The biggest 150 kilometers northwest of Juba in Western Equatoria state. accomplishment was the completion of Lui The program also funded construction of a haffir , an open water reservoir and distribution system primarily for livestock, to serve 1,800 people in Water Supply and Rumbek, the capital of the Lakes state. Rumbek, which served as the tempo- Distribution System rary administrative center for the government of Southern Sudan just after the Comprehensive Peace Agreement, is roughly 375 kilometers northwest of Juba. Also in Rumbek, the MDTF‑SS funded construction of the Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation state office building, one of 10 such buildings in state capitals across South Sudan. Other project activities completed in 2011–12 included: • Constructing 45 new boreholes serving 22,500 people. • Rehabilitating 235 existing boreholes serving 117,500 people. • Constructing 17 new water distribution systems, serving 51,000 people in nine states. • Rehabilitating 12 water distribution systems, serving 36,000 people. • Constructing state laboratories for water quality testing. • Rehabilitating the Amadi Rural Development Institute, one of the coun- try’s oldest training institutes, located in Western Equatoria. Education Rehabilitation Project South Sudan’s education indicators are among the world’s lowest, despite increases in school enrollment over the past few years. Some 73 percent of adults are illiterate, and 70 percent of children ages 6–17 have never set foot 18 SOUTH SUDAN in a classroom. More than 1 million primary school–age children, mostly The MDTF‑SS’s from rural areas, are not in school. Among those who attend, fewer than 1 in $25.5 million 10 completes primary school. Education The MDTF‑SS’s $25.5 million Education Rehabilitation Project improved ac- Rehabilitation Project cess to primary education and created alternative learning opportunities for improved access to internally displaced people, demobilized soldiers, and other nontraditional learners. primary education and created From the outset, one of the government’s top priorities under the MDTF‑SS alternative learning was to rebuild the country’s education infrastructure (box 2). Decades of war had wreaked havoc on South Sudan’s already frail education system. opportunities for School buildings had been abandoned and decayed; many were ransacked internally displaced or destroyed in the conflict. By the beginning of 2012, the MDTF‑SS had sup- people, demobilized ported the construction of 52 schools, across all 10 states. soldiers, and other The major project accomplishment in 2012 was the supply and distribution nontraditional of furniture to 38 of the 52 constructed schools. Desks and chairs were deliv- ered to schools in the states of Western Bahr el Ghazal, Western Equatoria, learners Central Equatoria, Jonglei, and Upper Nile. In a few northern states, includ- ing Northern Bahr el Ghazal, some schools still lack furniture, which the government is planning to supply. An additional accomplishment was the construction of a printing facility with press equipment in Juba. Umbrella Program for Health System Development II South Sudan’s maternal mortality ratio—2,054 per 100,000 live births—is the highest in the world, and the coverage of preventive services such as immu- nization is among the lowest. Hunger and disease reached critical propor- tions during the war years, eliciting an international humanitarian response. The MDTF‑SS provided emergency and rapid deployment of medicines and rehabilitated more than 87 health facilities across the country, including the Juba Teaching Hospital and mobile clinics. 19 Box 2. Loa Primary School rehabilitation: putting education back on track in South Sudan On any given school day, 410 primary school students—more than half of them girls—sit at desks inside the Loa Primary School with textbooks and access to clean water and pit latrines. Eleven teachers—two of them women—help these students focus on their studies, thanks to the support of the MDTF‑SS. This situation is a big improvement from just after the war, when school days were spent sitting on logs in makeshift shelters that parents put up. The Loa Primary School—near the border with Uganda, roughly 75 kilometers southeast of Juba—is one of eight schools built in Eastern Equatoria state with MDTF‑SS support as part of the Education Rehabilitation Project. When the civil war intensified in the late 1980s, inhabitants of Loa left home in search of a safe haven. With the uncertainty that war brings, they had no option but to go to into the bush, abandoning the school. “To add insult into injury, a few months later, people came around and destroyed the whole structure,� said Oryem Wani, an official with the Ministry of Education and General Instruction, whose eyes could not hide his lingering grief. The rehabilitated school features six classrooms, a staff room, and a head teacher’s office. “The building of this school has improved the learning environment in this place,� said Amole Joseph, the school’s head teacher.     The Umbrella Program for Health System Development Phase II was de- signed to build on Phase I achievements. Cumulative results included a fivefold increase in female access to antenatal services and child immuni- zations. In addition, as of December 31, 2012, 84 health facilities had been rehabilitated, which helped improve citizen access to and the quality of basic health care services around the country. 20 SOUTH SUDAN The program’s major 2012 accomplishment was the delivery of a six-month In 2012, the HIV/AIDS supply of medical and pharmaceutical products to a central medical storage Project continued facility in Juba. The supplies were to cover 47 hospitals, 250 primary health care centers, and 1,000 primary health care units across the country. to increase access to comprehensive HIV/AIDS Project HIV/AIDS services The year 2012 held some good news for HIV/AIDS in South Sudan: a gov- through voluntary ernment report released in March 2013 indicated a drop in HIV/AIDS counseling and testing —from 3 percent in 2010 to 2.6 percent. prevalence­ centers, conducting “This is a great achievement for us all,� said Dr. Esterina Novello, chair­ HIV/AIDS awareness person of the South Sudan AIDS Commission. “However, challenges remain campaigns, in this time of constraints on resources in the face of the continuing need distributing condoms, for HIV drugs and services, especially at the time that everyone is moving toward using drugs, not only as treatment but also as prevention.� and providing antiretroviral The $36.75 million multisectoral HIV/AIDS Project was designed to strength- en a coordinated national, and largely preventive, response by building ca- treatment to people pacity at the regional, state, and county levels. Scaling up the delivery of com- living with HIV/AIDS prehensive HIV/AIDS services, the project supported integrating HIV/AIDS into critical government sectors. The project ran for nearly five years, from November 2007 through September 2012. In 2012, the Ministry of Health was to procure HIV/AIDS drugs, but contract disputes arose. An invitation for bids was posted in April 2012 for antiret- roviral drugs, test kits, and laboratory supplies, with a deadline of May 11, 2012. The purchase was partially completed by the project’s closure. 21 The Support to Also in 2012, the HIV/AIDS Project continued to increase access to compre- hensive HIV/AIDS services through voluntary counseling and testing cen- Agriculture and ters, conducting HIV/AIDS awareness campaigns, distributing condoms, and Forestry Development providing antiretroviral treatment to people living with HIV/AIDS. Project focused on Support to Agriculture and Forestry Development Project constructing and rehabilitating roughly With vast stretches of fertile arable land and several months of rainfall a dozen physical every year, South Sudan has the potential to become the region’s bread- basket. In South Sudan, 70 percent of the land is arable, 85 percent of the facilities in 2012 population subsists on agriculture for their livelihood, and the majority of South Sudanese own livestock. The government is confident that within the next decade the country will be a major exporter of animal products. Despite the country’s enormous agricultural potential and dependence, its people face multiple challenges in realizing national and household food security. Leveraging South Sudan’s farming potential will help individual families transition from a subsistence system to modern sustainable agri- culture, as well as help stimulate the local economy and reduce reliance on food imports. The Support to Agriculture and Forestry Development Project introduced improved technologies for seeds, planting materials, and tools in order to enhance farmers’ knowledge and ability to produce, store, and market qual- ity seeds. It also provided cuttings for staple crops such as sorghum, maize, cassava, ground nuts, and cowpeas. Additionally, the project focused on building the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry’s capacity in the states, an aspect generally neglected by the donor community. Increased state capacity strengthened ties among the central, state, and local governments and with nongovernmental organizations and private providers. By January 2012, well more than 95 percent of the project’s $43 million had been disbursed, enhancing agriculture and forestry in at least 27 counties and promoting improved technologies in four broad areas: agroforestry, crop production, forestry, and livestock. The project focused on constructing and rehabilitating roughly a dozen physical facilities in 2012, including: • Completing the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry headquarters in Juba. 22 SOUTH SUDAN • Completing three border post inspection sites, where imported seeds The Rapid Impact coming into South Sudan are verified, inspected, and tested to ensure Emergency Project they are disease- and pest-free. These border post inspection sites are in Eastern and Central Equatoria, on the border with Kenya and Uganda. addressed challenges such as shortages • Constructing the Kegulu Agricultural Training Facility in Central Equa- of basic health and toria, on the Ugandan border. education supplies, • Constructing and equipping four seed-storage facilities, where farmers weak public financial can process and store their seeds after harvest. Agricultural productivity management, hinges on access to quality seeds in time for planting. Improperly stored seeds are vulnerable to damage from pests and inclement weather. The low procurement facility processes the seeds with chemicals and stores the seeds on behalf capacity, and of farmers until planting season. inadequate • Rehabilitating soil laboratories in the Wau and Yei Research Centers. Wau government is roughly 650 kilometers northwest of Juba in Western Bahr el Ghazal working facilities state. Yei is a medium-size city in the southwest, near the border with the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda. By its conclusion in December 2012, the project had helped 446,929 farm- ers improve their crop yields and trained 7,000 women in farm and non- farm income-generating activities. Participating farmers had adopted better farming technologies, increasing yields and areas of land under cultivation. The yields of maize and sorghum increased 70 percent on average. Farmers increased seed production, and the project yielded 334.4 metric tons of im- proved seeds and planting materials. Rapid Impact Emergency Project The Rapid Impact Emergency Project, the first MDTF‑SS project, was de- signed to respond to people’s acute needs in the difficult environment that prevailed immediately after the signing of the Comprehensive Peace Agree- ment. The project addressed challenges such as shortages of basic health and education supplies, weak public financial management, low procurement ca- pacity, and inadequate government working facilities. Seven of the eight project components were completed in 2009: • Pharmaceuticals. Supported the procurement and distribution of phar- maceuticals, vaccines, and medical consumables for 1,000 health i ncluding hospitals, health centers, and health posts. facilities—­ 23 Construction of • Learning materials. Supported the procurement and distribution of text- books, teacher manuals, and primary school student and teacher kits. the South Sudan Anticorruption • Procurement. Helped the government carry out day-to-day procure- Commission and the ment activities and formulate procurement regulations, policies, and procedures. South Sudan Audit Chamber buildings, • Accounting. Helped the government establish a short-term MDTF‑SS both supported under Project Disbursement Unit managed by an accounting firm (KPMG) to prepare and issue project implementation guidelines and track the Rapid Impact expenditures. Emergency Project, was still under way • Furnish and equip central government offices. Supplied office furni- ture and equipment—including computers, photocopiers, scanners, V-sat at the end of 2012 equipment, generators, and vehicles—to enable about 90 director-level of- ficials and 180 deputy directors in 22 ministries to function effectively. • Support to governors’ offices in the 10 states. Supported the establishment of a governor’s office in each of South Sudan’s 10 states through building renovations and provision of office equipment. • Public works. Under United Nations Development Programme manage- ment, supported local communities in 10 states on 142 small civil works and public infrastructure projects, such as pit latrines, small roads, and market shelters, as determined by local authorities through steering committees. The eighth component, “support to the commissions,� was added in 2007 to fund construction of 22 commission buildings. However, only two of those commissions—the South Sudan Anticorruption Commission and the South Sudan Audit Chamber—were able to provide building sites. So, these two commissions requested permanent structures in place of the initially pro- posed, less costly prefabricated structures. This upgrade was afforded by a combination of additional MDTF‑SS financing, substantial stretching of proj- ect resources, and other donations. After a long procurement process, construction of the South Sudan Audit Chamber building launched in 2011, but the site subsequently became un- available. Once a new site was identified, the project was significantly be- hind schedule, and by the end of 2012, the building was only 25 percent com- plete. The South Sudan Anticorruption Commission building was reported to be 70 percent complete by the project’s closure. 24 SOUTH SUDAN Since the MDTF‑SS’s closure, the government has taken over the completion The Gender Support of the buildings using its own resources, taken from unexpended MDTF‑SS and Development contributions. According to government officials, construction delays were caused by the compressed project timeframe, land allocation issues, limited Project improved funding due to austerity measures, confusion about tax-exemption policies, access to existing and contractor cash-flow problems. economic Gender Support and Development Project opportunities for women and helped South Sudan’s female literacy rate is among the world’s lowest, rivaling that the Ministry of Gender, of Niger, Burkina Faso, and Afghanistan for last place on literacy rankings. A 15-year-old girl in South Sudan has a greater chance of dying in childbirth Child, and Social than of finishing school. Gender-based violence threatens individuals and Welfare develop and communities. implement gender The $10 million Gender Support and Development Project achieved immedi- policies and strategies ate peace dividends for targeted women by improving access to existing eco- nomic opportunities and helping the Ministry of Gender, Child, and Social Welfare develop and implement gender policies and strategies. 25 Box 3. Women improve their livelihoods and their children’s lives As South Sudanese husbands and sons went to battle, some never to return home, women took on an increas- ingly important role as breadwinners for their households. Recognizing women’s evolving economic role, the government launched the Gender Development Support Project under the MDTF‑SS to improve their livelihoods. The project issued grants of up to $50,000 to 108 organized women’s groups to support economic em- powerment activities in agriculture, fisheries, livestock, and commerce. Implemented by the Ministry of Gender, Child, and Social Welfare, the project indirectly supported the education and health care of benefi- ciaries’ children as well. One example of how this project benefited women and their children is the Bor-based Future Women Group in Jonglei state, which operates a shop selling dresses, shoes, and cosmetics. One group member, who is in a polygamous marriage, said she used to worry about paying her own household expenses when her husband’s senior wife took all his salary. “Now, I am at ease because I can feed my children and pay their school fees,� she said. Another group supported by the MDTF‑SS, the Jonglei Women’s Association, ventured into agriculture despite having only pastoralist experience. In 2011, the women farmed 48 acres and produced 195 bags of maize and vegetables, including tomatoes, onions, okra, hudra, eggplants, and beans, which they sold in Bor. The Jonglei State Minister of Social Welfare, Rachael Anok Omot, said, “We are fighting a great war that is hunger and poverty. Now, women are working to build a better world. I will stand with them side by side.� In Upper Nile, four dozen members of the Widow Women’s Group of Malakal support themselves by growing vegetables on land donated by the government and community under the MDTF‑SS. The women also run a coffee shop in town. The National Minister for Gender, Child, and Social Welfare, Agnes Kwaje Lasuba, said during a recent visit to Jonglei and Upper Nile States that she was pleased that the economic empowerment project had raised the quality of life for women and their families.“With these projects, we are going in the right direction,� she said. South Sudan has a long way to go to meet the third Millennium Development Goal of promoting gender equality and empowering women: girls account for only 27 percent of primary school enrolment, and more than 90 percent of women over age 15 are illiterate. However, the Gender Development Support Project has helped many South Sudanese women take huge strides toward gender equality. “I am very grateful for the support given to us by the MDTF‑SS, the World Bank, and our development partners,� one woman said. “They have given us women the opportunity to become self-reliant and inde- pendent. Despite the many challenges we are facing, the MDTF‑SS has demonstrated that, given the right policies and support from the government and its development partners, women will effectively contribute to the economy of South Sudan.� 26 SOUTH SUDAN The project’s three components were institutional support, women’s eco- The Gender nomic empowerment, and gender mainstreaming. While much of the work Development Support was cross-sectoral, specific project accomplishments included: Project’s three • Establishing a Ministry of Gender, Child, and Social Welfare to champion components were women’s interests in development matters. The ministry developed a Na- institutional support, tional Gender Policy based on stakeholder input in May and June 2012. women’s economic • Awarding grants to 108 women’s groups for economic empowerment empowerment, projects (box 3). and gender • Training nearly 2,700 women in farm and nonfarm income-generating mainstreaming activities. In early 2012, the MDTF‑SS Oversight Committee agreed to add a new ele- ment to the project at government’s request: the construction of a headquar- ters building in Juba for the Ministry of Gender, Child, and Social Welfare. All parties were aware from the outset of the risk that construction might not be completed before the project’s closure, but MDTF‑SS stakeholders priori- tized starting a permanent structure for the ministry. The building was 35 percent complete as of December 31, 2012, and there was an unspent balance of $1.7 million in donor funding. The government has taken over completing the building. 27 The Core Fiduciary Four additional projects wound down in 2012 Support Systems Four additional projects active in January 2012 were in the final stages of Project contributed closure during the year. These projects included: substantially to • Sudan Emergency Transport and Infrastructure Development Project. building the Ministry Most activities were completed in 2010–11. But there were some contract of Finance and disputes with contractors and engineers. In early 2012, the final pay- Economic Planning’s ments were approved by the government and made by May 2012. The project closed on June 30, 2012. overall financial management • Roads Maintenance Project. Narrow, rutted, and poorly maintained, many capacity, helping roads in South Sudan are impassable during the rainy season, which lasts roughly half the year, from March or April to October. This MDTF‑SS boost the National $40 million project supported the government’s road maintenance pro- Audit Chamber’s gram by repairing and maintaining a core road network in South Sudan. capacity, and It also supported the Ministry of Roads and Bridges’ road maintenance capacity-building and road management reforms. This project closed on facilitating the August 31, 2012. development of a procurement • Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reintegration Programme. The ­ nited Nations Development Programme managed the MDTF‑SS– U framework and bill funded program, which supported thousands of ex-combatants re- turning to civilian life. During 2012, the program helped the 10 states develop tailored strategies for tracing and mobilizing missing ex- combatants. Additional 2012 activities included the distribution of 204 start-up kits to ex-combatants, follow-up visits to more than 900 ex- combatants that already had undergone training, and the provision of additional reintegration support. This project closed on December 31, 2012. • Private Sector Development Project. Most activities were completed in 2011 but the project closed on June 30, 2012, having supported business growth and created a better business enabling environment (box 4). 28 SOUTH SUDAN Box 4. Entrepreneur builds a computer business with MDTF‑SS microfinancing Manyok Elijah Dut had never known peace in his homeland until 2006 when, at age 22, he returned to Juba. Born just after the second civil war broke out, Elijah lost his father at age 4. He lived in Uganda and Ethio- pia with his mother and four siblings until a year after the Comprehensive Peace Agreement, when the family finally moved back home. On his return, he got a job as a clerical assistant at the Jonglei state office of the Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning. Within three months, his supervisor noted his aptitude for computers and recom- mended him for a computer training course. Thus began his journey from being a civil servant to owning a thriving small business. Within a year, Elijah used his savings of roughly $650 to open a shop offering photocopying, printing, and typing services. He then entered the MDTF‑SS business plan competition, along with 1,600 other South Sudanese entrepre- neurs. The competition was an MDTF‑SS−Ministry of Commerce, Trade, and Supply initiative. In March 2010, he was awarded $20,000 as collateral for a loan, as well as the opportunity for basic business skill training. Training sessions covered topics such as recordkeeping, customer care, cash flow, and financial management. With the loan, Elijah rented a bigger shop that was partitioned into rooms for training, an Internet café, and secretarial services such as typing, printing, scanning, and photocopying. He also sold computers and accessories such as batteries, network cables, flash drives, and floppy disks. ­ Today, Elijah is a successful young entrepreneur, employing six people, including a business manager, computer techni- cian, and computer trainers who conduct daily sessions for customers. Within 14 months of receiving the loan, Elijah’s business realized a profit of roughly $8,300. He has since taken on a second loan with KCB Sudan Limited. Now 29 years old, Elijah is setting his sights even higher: he plans to acquire land, construct permanent structures, and establish a business center. He believes business can thrive in a peaceful environment, free of wars, corruption, and displacement of people. And with the initial support from the MDTF‑SS and the govern- ment, he is proving that to be true. 29 Core Fiduciary Support Systems Project The Core Fiduciary Support Systems Project, implemented by the Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning, was intended to establish a skeletal fi- duciary system for channeling MDTF‑SS fund flows from the donors and government. In reality, the project achieved much more, contributing sub- stantially to building the ministry’s overall financial management capacity, helping boost the National Audit Chamber’s capacity, and facilitating the de- velopment of a procurement framework and bill. The project’s main beneficiaries included: • Staff of the Accounts Directorate and Procurement Policy Unit of the Min- istry of Finance and Economic Planning. • Staff of the National Audit Chamber. • Ministries, departments, and agencies that were audited. • All 10 states, which were audited. • The National Legislative Assembly, which used the audited reports for the accountability process. • The general public through the project’s support of the government’s im- proved resource management. The project was the last to close (on March 31, 2013), because its activities included auditing all MDTF‑SS projects. The project’s accomplishments in 2011–12 included: • Conducting 2011 audits and 2012 interim audits for ongoing projects. • Finalizing the 2010 audit of government accounts. • Supporting the drafting of a procurement bill, which is pending cabinet approval. 30 3 Financials: MDTF‑SS portfolio performance The government was the largest single contributor to the MDTF‑SS, having contributed $179 million, or 25 percent of the total amount as of March 31, 2013. International donors paid in $548.6 million. At closing, the funds paid-in of $727.6 million were lower than expected, given a reduction in the share of counterpart funding from the government. Initially, the government-to-donor funding ratio was set at 2:1; every dollar contributed by donors was to be matched by two dollars from the govern- ment of South Sudan. Under that scenario, the total value of the MDTF‑SS would have been about $1.5 billion. However, in 2008–09, after South Sudan experienced financial difficulties, the ratio was revised down to 1:1. By the fund’s closure, the government’s share of total MDTF‑SS receipts had de- clined further, to one quarter of the total. Donor payments to the MDTF‑SS were received progressively over 2005–11 (table 2). The cumulative investment income earned from 2005 through 2012 was $40.5 million. Of that, $206,000 was earned in 2012. Investment income—earned only on unused funds—started declining in 2009, when the pace of disbursements picked up. As of March 31, 2013, the MDTF‑SS portfolio had disbursed $717.2 million ($538.6 million from donors and $178.6 million from the government) and expended $713.8 million ($537.4 million from donors and $176.4 million from the government). Thus the MDTF‑SS portfolio disbursed 100 percent ($717.2 million) and expended 99 percent of the funds committed to proj- ects ($713.8 million expended out of $718.2 million committed, of which $540.2 million was contributed by donors and $178.0 million by the govern- ment; tables 3 and 4). Donor administrative agreements indicate that the World Bank will return remaining funds to donors based on the proportion of their contribution. The government has requested that the Ministry of Finance and Economic Plan- ning allow the respective ministries to use the government’s unexpended MDTF‑SS funds to complete ongoing MDTF‑SS activities rather than refund the amounts to the government treasury. 31 Table 2. Total donor commitments and deposits As of March 31, 2013 ($ millions) Donor Donor commitment Donor paid-in amount Netherlands 147.1 151.3 Norway 91.7 91.7 United Kingdom 73.2 74.8 Canada 60.2 60.2 European Union 59.8 59.8 Sweden 34.0 34.0 Finland 30.1 29.8 Spain 16.9 16.9 Germany 12.0 12.0 Denmark 8.0 8.1 World Bank 5.0 5.0 Italy 3.4 3.4 Egypt 1.0 1.0 Iceland 0.4 0.5 Total 542.8 548.6 Note: Donor commitments are often legally defined in currencies other than U.S. dollars. As a result, the amount received may differ from the commitment depending on the exchange rate used at the time contributions were received and converted into U.S. dollars. 32 SOUTH SUDAN Table 3. Donor commitments and disbursements by project As of March 31, 2013 Disbursed funds as a share of Commitment Disbursements committed funds Project ($ millions) ($ millions) (percent) Sudan Emergency Transport and Infrastructure Development Project 89.9 89.9 100.0 Roads Maintenance Project 40.0 40.0 100.0 Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration Programme 36.4 36.4 100.0 Umbrella Programme for Health I 32.0 32.0 100.0 Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Project 30.0 30.0 100.0 Multi Donor Education Rehabilitation Project 25.5 25.5 100.0 Police and Prisons II 19.8 19.8 100.0 Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Project 19.0 19.0 100.0 HIV/AIDS Project 17.6 17.6 100.0 Sudan New Currency Project 15.0 15.0 100.0 Livestock and Fisheries Development Project 13.5 13.5 100.0 Core Fiduciary Support Systems Project 13.4 13.4 100.0 Capacity Building, Institutional and Human Resource Development 12.2 12.2 100.0 Private Sector Development Project 9.0 9.0 100.0 Census II 7.9 7.9 100.0 Census I 5.3 5.3 100.0 Police and Prisons I 5.3 5.3 100.0 Umbrella Programme for Health Systems Development II 71.5 71.4 99.9 Support to Agriculture and Forestry Development Project 30.2 30.1 99.7 Rapid Impact Emergency Project 36.3 35.8 98.6 Gender Support Development Project 10.5 9.7 92.4 Total 540.2 538.6 99.7 33 Table 4. Sources and uses of funds, 2005–12 As of December 31, 2012 ($ millions) Total, 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2005–12 Sources of funds Net donor contribution 99.4 121.6 153.4 87.5 97.6 23.2 4.0 — 586.9 Cash contribution from donors 99.4 121.6 153.4 87.5 97.6 21.3 3.4 — 548.5 Investment income 0.4 6.4 12.7 12.6 5.5 2.1 0.6 0.3 40.6 International Development Association overhead (0.4 percent) and audit fees (0.2) (0.6) (0.5) (0.4) (0.4) (0.1) (0.0) — (2.2) Uses of funds Commitments 72.4 71.0 86.5 21.0 97.8 204.0 28.9 6.7 588.2 Grant agreements signed 70.0 68.0 80.6 16.0 91.3 193.9 21.5 (1.0) 540.3 Program administration (allocation)a 1.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 4.5 8.0 6.3 7.1 38.9 Monitoring agent contract 1.4 — 1.9 — 1.9 2.1 1.1 0.6 9.0 — is not applicable. a. Amount transferred to cover the cost of running the technical secretariat and of project preparation and supervision. This amount is less than the approved budget because funds are transferred on a need basis rather than based on the notional budget, which is the ceiling not to be exceeded. 34 4 Closure and beyond The closing of the MDTF‑SS offers an opportunity to celebrate all that the government and its partners have accomplished over the past seven years under the MDTF‑SS—and to learn from the experience. An independent evaluation of the MDTF‑SS started in November 2012 and is scheduled to finish in June 2013. The evaluation’s desktop review identified four levels of lessons based on the large body of documentation assessing the MDTF‑SS experience: operational, institutional, technical, and political. Another final initiative of the MDTF‑SS was to share success stories and accomplishments in a “Telling the MDTF‑SS Story� newsletter and an 18- month calendar. The MDTF‑SS also produced a three-minute documentary to communicate the real-life human impact of MDTF‑SS interventions. The publications and video are available on the World Bank website. Optimism, resilience, and collaborative spirit The MDTF‑SS closes at a time of cautious optimism for South Sudan, which has captured the heart and goodwill of the international community. It closes at the end of June 2013 with a renewed commitment from the international community for long-term engagement with South Sudan to support inclusive political governance, public accountability, effective social services, and a vibrant private sector, through various bilateral and multilateral means. The central challenge for South Sudan will be to lay the foundation for ef- fective, accountable, and self-sustaining institutions that respond to its citi- zens’ needs. While helping South Sudan build institutions is a long-term endeavor, the people of South Sudan must also see a tangible short-term return in improved livelihoods, enhanced service delivery, and a revital- ized economy. The World Bank’s Interim Strategy Note for fiscal 2013 and 2014, “Building Institutions for Prosperity and Peace,� responds to the government’s request 35 for assistance in economic management, local service delivery, and liveli- hoods with an International Development Association–16 credit of $131 mil- lion as well as a range of advisory and analytical activities. The World Bank will continue to strike a balance between meeting immediate needs and ad- dressing emerging stresses, while building sustainable institutional capac- ity and accountability. In late March 2013, the World Bank’s board of execu- tive directors approved a $50 million International Development Association credit to improve local governance and service delivery in South Sudan. This is in addition to a bridging grant of $75 million supporting continued work on three former MDTF-SS projects in health, private sector development, and roads. Experts predict that South Sudan will enjoy substantial oil revenues for at least the next decade. Acres of arable land are available to enterprising farmers. South Sudanese men and women alike have demonstrated their entrepreneurial spirit, seizing opportunities to expand their vocational skills, to leverage loans to build small businesses, and to improve their livelihoods. Hope and opportunity are thriving in South Sudan. 36 Annex MDTF‑SS results by Joint Assessment Mission sector Table A1.  1. Institutional development and capacity building MDTF‑SS goals Key milestones reached and outputs achieved To establish a foundation for effective, • Human resource regulations adopted by all South efficient, and transparent functioning Sudan ministries and all 10 state governments of the Republic of South Sudan • Strategic plan and long-term strategy available for future growth and development of public service To put in place critical • 1,220 public service personnel provided government infrastructure at the adequate training in respective fields national and state levels • 18 ministry buildings rehabilitated and equipped, including presidential and vice presidential facilities • Numerous government administrative buildings rehabilitated To increase access to labor • Training-needs assessment conducted markets, welfare assistance, and • Employment services and labor offices functional in three states vocational training services • Labor office staff trained in regulation, labor market welfare, and job placement administration To establish minimal fiduciary systems • Five annual government audits completed with one more planned to provide reasonable assurance to • Continued progress toward oversight of public procurement stakeholders on the use of funds by the finance ministry with other ministries, departments, and agencies accountable for their procurement • Up-to-date procurement plans for ministries, departments, and agencies put in place and being implemented 2. Rule of law and governance MDTF‑SS goals Key milestones reached and outputs achieved To substantially increase the • 22 police stations rehabilitated or constructed, furnished, and equipped capacity of the police and prison • Six central prisons rehabilitated or constructed, furnished, and equipped system across South Sudan to deliver professional services • Four state training centers constructed, refurbished, and equipped • Field training manual developed and training sessions completed • Juba Central Prison facilities adapted to meet special needs of incarcerated women with children 3. Economic policy and management MDTF‑SS goals Key milestones reached and outputs achieved To support the Central Bank of • 900 million banknotes in six denominations exchanged for old currencies Sudan’s effort to effectively, efficiently, • 761 million coins distributed and transparently introduce a new national unifying currency (continued) 37  DTF‑SS results by Joint Assessment Mission sector (continued) Table A1. M 4. Productive sectors (rural and private sector development) MDTF‑SS goals Key milestones reached and outputs achieved To revitalize and improve the capacity • 360 staff members of the Ministry of Animal Resources and of relevant public sector institutions Fisheries and the State Directorate of Animal Resources and in order to guide and support the Fisheries trained and competent in technical and managerial skills livestock and fisheries sectors • Assessment of premises for construction and rehabilitation of offices in five states and 28 counties completed by the Ministry of Animal Resources and Fisheries • United Nations Office of Project Services contracted to construct state offices in Juba, Torit, Malakal, Bor, and Bentiu To create an appropriate policy • Drafts under review for legislative action, including Meat environment for the improved functioning Control and Slaughter Facilities Bill, Fertilizers and Animal of the livestock and fisheries sectors Food Stuff of Animal Origin Bill, Hides and Skins and Leather Processing Bill, and Range Management and Grass Fires Bill To improve availability and access • 12 mobile veterinary clinics procured and distributed to animal health services • 580,226 animals vaccinated and 329,589 animals treated for various diseases To establish an enabling environment • Microfinance policy presented to the South Sudan Central Bank for private sector development • Public-private dialogue forum established and functional and to support sector growth • South Sudan Microfinance Development Facility established and functional • Three new microfinance institutions operational • 26,596 people with access to finance through targeted microfinance institutions • Number of steps to register a business streamlined from 10 to 3 • 14,298 businesses registered • 45 startups established through business plan competition • Five laws to improve the enabling environment for business presented to government officials To increase the productivity and • Farmers in five states, 27 counties, and 137 production of participating small farming payams adopting new technologiesa households in agriculture and forestry • 42,805 feddans cultivated (either with crops or trees) by participating farmersb 5. Basic social services MDTF‑SS goals Key milestones reached and outputs achieved To improve access to enhanced • 1.39 million children enrolled in primary education quality of education and alternate • 850,000 students benefited from improved learning materials learning opportunities • 416 additional classrooms built or rehabilitated at the primary level • 2.2 million textbooks purchased and distributed • 42 training rooms and dorms in multipurpose education centers built or rehabilitated (continued) 38 SOUTH SUDAN  DTF‑SS results by Joint Assessment Mission sector (continued) Table A1. M To improve the delivery of basic • 67,069 children immunized health services in four states • 14 percent of childbirths taking place in health facilities • 60 percent of health facilities having at least 10 essential drugs in stock To strengthen the stewardship functions • 54 percent of health facilities now submitting new monthly of the national health ministry reports to the Health Management and Information System • 31,467 long-lasting, insecticide-treated malaria nets purchased and/or distributed • 24 months of supplies available in health service institutions • 0.4 outpatient visits per capita a year • Juba hospital rehabilitated and fully functional To increase access to safe water • 528 targeted community water points constructed with an and sanitation facilities established water committee and management plan • 966,000 people with access to improved water sources • 1,011 additional households with improved sanitation facilities • Nine water-quality laboratories established and adequately equipped in state capitals • 128 public latrines constructed • 250,000 residents in Juba with access to clean drinking water To increase access to comprehensive • 10 states with functional AIDS commissions HIV/AIDS services • HIV/AIDS monitoring and evaluation system put in place to collect strategic information at all levels • 80,579 persons counseled, tested, and made aware of their HIV status 6. Infrastructure MDTF‑SS goals Key milestones reached and outputs achieved To improve access and quality of • 1,030 roads rehabilitated targeted roads in South Sudan • Rural roads development plan prepared, including design for 1,500 kilometers of new rural roads and feasibility and detailed design for 560 kilometers of trunk roads • Environmental and Social Monitoring Unit established, equipped, and functional with minimal staff • Southern Sudan Roads Authority Act 2011 enacted, and South Sudan Roads Authority established as an autonomous body 7. Livelihoods and social protection MDTF‑SS goals Key milestones reached and outputs achieved To improve access to existing • Gender assessment report to inform gender strategies submitted economic opportunities for women • New building for the Ministry of Gender, Social Welfare, and Religious Affairs being constructed To support the Ministry of Gender, Social Welfare, and Religious Affairs in developing gender policies and strategies 8. Information and monitoring MDTF‑SS goals Key milestones reached and outputs achieved To make available reliable and accurate • Census pilot conducted in November 2006 and census demographic, economic, and social data completed in all areas of Sudan by December 2007 • Census results analyzed, evaluated, and released in 2009 a. Payams are small districts inside counties, which are comprised of multiple payams. b. Feddans are units of areas equal to approximately 1.038 acres or 0.42 hectares. Note: Some figures may reflect data gathered through the first quarter of 2012, when the revised results framework on which this table is based had been more extensively incorporated into results reporting. 39