MADHYA PRADESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK (ESMF) INCLUDING RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK & INDIGENOUS PEOPLES MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK FOR WORLD BANK FUNDED MADHYA PRADESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (MPUDP) October 05, 2016 June 04, 2018 (updated) VOLUME I Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Co. Ltd. Government of Madhya Pradesh Department of Urban Development and Housing 8, Arera Hills, Jail Road, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh Table of Contents List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures ..........................................................................................................................iv Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................. v Executive Summary ................................................................................................................vi 1 Program Overview ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) for MPUDP .................. 2 1.2.1 Objectives of ESMF ............................................................................................... 2 1.3. Details of Subprojects under MPUDP ........................................................................... 3 2 Environmental and Social Profile of MPUDP ........................................................... 6 2.1. Baseline Profile of Subproject Towns ................................................................................ 6 2.2. Potential Environmental and Social Issues in MPUDP Subprojects ................................ 15 3 Environmental Management Framework ............................................................... 17 3.1. Guiding Principles ....................................................................................................... 17 3.2. The ESMF Process ....................................................................................................... 17 3.3. Environment Management Framework ....................................................................... 18 3.3.1. Environmental Regulations .................................................................................. 19 3.3.2. Requirements under EIA Notification 2006 and Amendments ............................ 19 3.3.3 World Bank Safeguard Policies ........................................................................... 22 3.3.4. Environmental Categorization of Subprojects ..................................................... 26 3.3.5. Carrying out Environment Assessment and Preparation of Environment Management Plan................................................................................................................ 28 3.3.6. Guidance on Preparation of Environment Management Plan ............................ 28 3.3.7. Environmental and Social Safeguard Issues in Technical Assistance (TA) Activities/Studies ................................................................................................................. 29 3.3.8. Environmental and Social Safeguard Management Subproject Financed through Credit Enhancement Facility............................................................................................... 29 3.3.9. Application of OP 7.50: International Water Ways of The World Bank ............ 29 4 Social Management Framework ............................................................................... 34 4.1. Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) ....................................................................... 34 4.2. Social Regulatory Framework ..................................................................................... 35 4.2.1. Key Gaps .............................................................................................................. 37 4.3 Categorisation of Subprojects ...................................................................................... 38 4.4 Social Impact Assessment and Resettlement Action Plan ........................................... 39 4.5. Land Compensation and Resettlement & Rehabilitation Planning ............................. 40 4.6. Basis for Entitlement Framework ................................................................................ 41 4.7 Entitlement for Project Affected Persons (PAPs) ......................................................... 43 4.8. Entitlement Framework .................................................................................................... 44 4.9. Institutional Arrangements........................................................................................... 50 5 Indigenous Peoples Planning Framework ............................................................... 52 5.1. Demographic Status of Scheduled Tribe and its Distribution ..................................... 52 i ESMF 5.1.1. Distribution of Tribes........................................................................................... 52 5.1.1. Regulatory Provisions for Indigenous People ..................................................... 55 5.2. Indigenous Peoples Management Framework (IPMF) ................................................ 56 5.3. Impact on Indigenous people in subproject areas ........................................................ 57 5.4. Indigenous People Plan (or Tribal Development Plan) ............................................... 57 5.5. Gender Assessment and Development Framework ..................................................... 57 5.6. Beneficiary Assessment ............................................................................................... 58 6 Stakeholder Consultation and Information Disclosure .......................................... 59 6.1. Subproject Consultations for preparing ESMF ............................................................ 59 6.2. Mechanism for Consultation ........................................................................................ 59 6.2.1. Subproject identification stage .................................................................................. 59 6.2.2. Planning/Design Stage .............................................................................................. 60 6.2.3. Implementation Stage ................................................................................................ 60 6.3. Stakeholder Mapping ................................................................................................... 61 6.4. Information Disclosure ................................................................................................ 61 7 Grievance Redressal Mechanism.............................................................................. 63 7.1. Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) ......................................................................... 63 7.2. Grievance Redress Mechanism .................................................................................... 63 8 Institutional Framework ........................................................................................... 65 8.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 65 8.2. Description of MPUDC ............................................................................................... 67 8.3. Framework to ensure ESMF implementation and Staff for MPUDP: ......................... 68 8.4. Reporting Framework .................................................................................................. 71 9 Monitoring, Review and Evaluation ........................................................................ 72 9.1. Overview ...................................................................................................................... 72 9.2. Review/Approval process ............................................................................................ 73 9.3. Evaluation /Audit of ESMF ......................................................................................... 73 10 Capacity Building and Training ............................................................................... 75 10.1. Background .................................................................................................................. 75 11 Budgetary Requirements........................................................................................... 78 11.1. General ......................................................................................................................... 78 11.2. External Support .......................................................................................................... 78 11.3. Subproject Costs .......................................................................................................... 79 Appendix ................................................................................................................................. 80 Appendix 1: Screening Checklist............................................................................................. 80 Appendix 2: Terms of Reference for ESA Studies .................................................................. 86 Appendix 3: Generic Environmental and Social Management Plan for Typical MPUDP Subprojects ............................................................................................................................... 89 Appendix 4: List of Schedule Areas in Madhya Pradesh ...................................................... 103 Appendix 5: Stakeholder Consultation and Disclosure ......................................................... 106 ii ESMF List of Tables Table Error! No text of specified style in document.-1.1: Subprojects under First Year of MPUDP Financing ..................................................................................................................... 3 Table 1.2: MPUDP Subproject under Advance Stage of Preparation ....................................... 3 Table 1.3: Potential Subprojects under Screening Stage ........................................................... 4 Table 2.1: Base Line Profile of Subproject Towns .................................................................... 7 Table 2.2: Likely Economic and Social Impacts in Subproject Towns ................................... 10 Table 2.3: Key Environmental Issues Likely to be faced in Subproject Towns ...................... 13 Table 3.1: Key Environmental Regulations of GoI / GoMP ................................................... 19 Table 3.2: World Bank Safeguard Policies .............................................................................. 23 Table 3.3 Criteria for Environmental Category of Projects ..................................................... 26 Table 3.4: Environmental Categorization of Initial 8 subprojects* ......................................... 27 Table 3.5: Details of MPUDP sub-projects likely to trigger OP 7.50 ..................................... 32 Table 4.1: Relevance of Applicable Social Legislations to MPUDP ...................................... 35 Table 4.2: Categorization of Subprojects................................................................................. 38 Table 4.3: Entitlement Matrix for Compensation and R&R .................................................... 45 Table 4.4: Framework to ensure RAPs implementation .......................................................... 50 Table 5.1: Declared Schedule V areas of Madhya Pradesh ..................................................... 54 Table 8.1: Overall Organizational Roles ................................................................................. 65 Table 8.2: Framework to Ensure ESMF Implementation ........................................................ 68 Table 10.1 : Training Program ................................................................................................. 76 Table 11.1: Proposed budget.................................................................................................... 78 iii ESMF List of Figures Figure 1.1: Location of Subproject Towns ................................................................................ 5 Figure 3.1: Environmental and Social Management Framework Process ............................... 18 Figure 5.1: Trends in Scheduled Tribes population (Million) ................................................. 53 Figure 5.2: Distribution of Scheduled Tribe Population by States .......................................... 53 Figure 5.3: Scheduled Tribes (millions) by Residence from 1961-2011 ................................. 53 Figure 5.4: Declared Schedule V areas of Madhya Pradesh .................................................... 54 iv ESMF Abbreviations ARAP Abridged Resettlement Action Plan ASI Archeological Survey of India BISCO Bhopal Indore Super Corridor DPR Detailed Project Report EA Environmental Assessment EHS Environment Health and Safety Guidelines EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan ESA Environmental and Social Assessment ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan GoI Government of India GoMP Government of Madhya Pradesh IEC Information, Education and Communication LA Land Acquisition MoEF &CC Ministry of Environment and Forest and Climate Change MPUDC Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company Limited MPUDP Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Project NGO Non-Governmental Organization OP Operational Policy PAPs Project Affected Persons PIU Project Implementation Unit PMU Project Management Unit R&R Resettlement and Rehabilitation RAP Resettlement Action Plan RPF Resettlement Policy Framework SA Social Analysis SMP Social Management Plan TA Technical Assistance ToR Terms of References UDHD Urban Development and Housing Department ULB Urban Local Bodies WB World Bank v ESMF Executive Summary Project Overview 1. Madhya Pradesh (MP) is geographically the second largest, fifth populous, and eighth most urbanized state in India. Although MP recorded a higher rate of growth for its urban compared to rural population in the last decade, its urbanization rate is still below the national average and is projected to catch-up in the next 15 years. At present, MP’s total urban population is about 20.1 million (28% of total population) concentrated in 476 urban centers. 2. Government of Madhya Pradesh (GoMP) accords high priority to urban infrastructure development. Madhya Pradesh vision 2018 is dedicated to water supply, and aims at universal coverage and reforms to improve efficiency of service delivery. The state Government has initiated various programs- with own funds, Government of India (GoI) funds and also from external funding agencies such as The World Bank, Asian Development Bank, Department for International Development and KfW Development Bank (KfW) to improve infrastructure. 3. The development objective of the proposed Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Project (MPUDP), proposed to be supported by the World Bank, is to enhance the capacity of the relevant State-level institutions to support urban local bodies (ULBs) in developing and financing urban infrastructure. To achieve the above objectives, the project envisages two main components: (i) institutional development component; and (ii) urban investment component. The sub component 2.1 of Component 2 is for Urban Investment which envisages development of urban infrastructure. Under this sub component, 25 ULBs have shown interest to avail funds infrastructure development. These projects include 7 Water Supply and 18 Sewerage projects. 4. In order to ensure sustainability of various activities envisaged under MPUDP, an Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) has been prepared to comply with the Environmental and Social regulations of GoI, GoMP and safeguard policies of World Bank. It will act as guidance for satisfactory assessment and management of environmental and social impacts at subproject level through appropriate measures during the planning, design, construction and operation phases of various activities of MPUDP. The framework will also help in identifying the adverse environment and social impacts and provide specific guidance on the policies and procedures to be followed for environmental and social assessment along with roles and responsibilities of the implementing agencies. Environmental and Social Policy of MPUDC 5. Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company (MPUDC) is the Implementing Agency for MPUDP. MPUDC’s policy is to promote principles of environmental sustainability and social relevance in projects executed by MPUDC. Environmental and Social Management Framework 6. MPUDC, a state-owned company, is committed to identify and address the environmental and social issues that may come across during various phases of the proposed MPUDP. To fulfill this responsibility, understanding the core issues as well as project specific issues of MPUDP is very important. For this purpose, MPUDC conducted a study by an independent consultant to help understand, environmental and social issues associated with MPUDP. An Environmental and Social Assessment (ESA) of the initial three subprojects to be vi ESMF implemented in the first year of MPUDP and preliminary study of all the 25 towns proposed in MPUDP has been conducted. Based on this analysis, an ESMF that ensures compliance of all project activities with the environmental regulations of GoI, State Government and the safeguard policies of the World Bank, has been prepared. 7. The ESMF is organized in two volumes. Volume I of the ESMF outlines the policies, assessments and procedures that will be followed by MPUDC, to ensure that all activities of MPUDP are developed and implemented in accordance with ESMF and are adequately safeguarded from associated risks. Volume II provides basic profile of all the subproject cities and the screening checklist for the identified subprojects. The ESMF also aims to sensitize the stake holders in carrying out assessment and management of environmental and social issues arising in urban infrastructure projects. Environment Regulatory Framework 8. The National and state level environmental laws and the Operational Policies of the World Bank will be applicable to MPUDP financed projects. The most important of the applicable laws are Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1981, of Government of India and OP 4.01 Environmental Assessment, OP 4.04 Natural Habitats, OP 4.11 Physical Cultural Resources and OP 7.50 International Waterways of The World Bank. Environmental Categorization of Subprojects 9. The urban infrastructure projects are expected to improve general living standards within urban localities. However depending on the location and the nature of project activities, these projects will have varying impacts on urban environment. An underground sewerage scheme may cause impact due to disposal of treated effluent and sludge; on the other hand a water supply project may be associated with extraction of water from natural resources which may affect downstream users, and disposal of sludge, and so on. Hence, to address the issues from MPUDP projects and based on the Environmental profile of the MPUDP towns the subproject have been categorized as - Ea, Eb and Ec linked to severity of impacts and regulatory requirements. Ea projects are expected to have significant environmental impacts and would require preparation of project specific Environmental Assessment (EA) by an independent agency other than a detailed project report (DPR) consultant; Eb projects are expected to have moderate impacts and would require preparation of project specific EA as part of Detail project report (DPR); and Ec projects are expected to have minimum environmental impacts and would require preparation of only Generic Environmental Management Plan (EMP). Sample environmental management plans for Water supply and sewerage projects are included in the Appendix 3 for guidance which will be customized specific to the project during EA preparation. Social Categorization of Subprojects 12. Based on the severity of impacts, ESMF has categorized the subprojects into three categories viz. Sa, Sb and Sc. Entitlement matrix provides mitigation measures for different impact categories viz. loss of land, residential structures, commercial structures, community assets, impact to title holders, tenants and leaseholders, non-title holders, loss of livelihoods, impacts to vulnerable households, and unidentified impacts and is in accordance with RFCTLARR Act 2013 and OP4.12 of the World Bank, and requires a preparation of Resettlement action Plan (RAP). vii ESMF It should be noted that social and environmental categorization mentioned here refer to categorization of MPUDP subprojects only, and should not be confused with the classification of Projects given in OP4.01 of the World Bank. As per safeguard policies of the World Bank, MPUDP has been categorized as a Category A project. Resettlement Policy Framework Key Principles of the Resettlement Policy Framework 10. The basic objective of the social management framework is to mitigate the social adverse impact to the population affected by the project implementation. The framework also emphasizes that the involuntary resettlement will be avoided and minimized by exploring different options. The ESMF bridges the gap between the World Bank’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement and Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (RTFCTLARR) Act 2013 of GoI. The broad categories of the economic and social impacts that would be mitigated are: a) Loss of land and assets; b) Loss of shelter or homestead lands; c) Loss of income or means of livelihood; d) Loss of access to productive resources, shelter/residences; and e) Loss of collective impacts on groups such as loss of community assets, common property resources and others. Regulatory Framework 11. The relevant national and state level laws are: RTFCTLARR 2013; The Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act 2009; MP State Land lease Policy; Madhya Pradesh Nagariya Kshetro ke Bhoomihin Vyakti (Pattadhriti Adhikaron ka Pradan kiya jana) Adhiniyam, 1984; The Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers(Recognition of Forest Rights) Act 2006; Right to Information Act 2005; and the World Bank Operational Policies OP 4.12 on Involuntary Resettlement, 4.10 on Indigenous Peoples and Policy on Access to Information and Disclosure. Application of ESMF 13. ESMF including Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) and Indigenous Peoples Planning Framework (IPPF) will be applicable for all the activities of MPUDP, i.e., activities under Technical Assistance and implementation including operation and maintenance of all subprojects and activities. Subproject Preparation 14. ESA will be prepared for various activities in line with the ESMF of MPUDP. Draft reports of subprojects will be shared with the World Bank for approval, after review by MPUDC as per the agreed policies and procedures of the ESMF. In case of Ea and Sa category subprojects, the terms of reference will also be shared with the World Bank for review and clearance. The final version of ESA and EMP and RAPs with a non-technical summary (both in English/ Hindi) will be disclosed on the websites of the concerned ULBs/Urban Development and Housing Department (UDHD) GoMP/relevant departments and will be made available in places accessible to the local people. Subproject Approval viii ESMF 15. The following subproject approval process will be followed: a) The subprojects will be screened by the MPUDP Project Management Unit (PMU) of MPUDC for environmental and social impacts and accordingly environmental and social category of the project would be determined, in line with the criteria established in the ESMF. b) Subsequently for each subproject, EMP and RAP (or Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan (ARAP) as applicable) will be prepared in compliance with ESMF. c) Prior to award of contracts, PMU of MPUDC will ensure safeguard readiness of the subproject through the Project officer of the concerned Project Implementation Unit (PIU) to fulfill the requirements of environment and Social Safeguards as outlined in the ESMF. d) MPUDC will ensure implementation of ESMF at all stages of the project and PMU will monitor all subprojects and activities to ensure conformity to the ESMF. e) Monitoring of Environmental and Social components will be carried out by MPUDC through environmental and social compliance reports of the concerned PIU based on field visits to subproject locations. f) An annual safeguard audit of EMPs, RAP/ARAPs will be carried out by independent agency and recommendations of the audit will be implemented in the respective subprojects and in MPUDP, as applicable. Institutional Framework 16. MPUDC is the Executing Agency for MPUDP. MPUDC will be executing the subprojects on behalf of the ULBs, through designated PIUs. MPUDC has established a PMU for the implementation of MPUDP and the PMU will have a dedicated Environment Engineer and a Social and Gender Officer to coordinate and monitor the implementation of ESMF of MPUDP. Their respective role is described in relevant sections of the ESMF. PMU of MPUDC will supervise, monitor and ensure implementation of environmental and social safeguards for all subprojects under MPUDP as per this ESMF through Environmental and Social Safeguard officers. The PMU shall be coordinating with PIU and ULBs to ensure ESMF compliance and preparation of relevant documents/ monthly reports. The PIUs will also have a designated environmental officer to supervise the implementation of safeguard activities of MPUDP subprojects within the jurisdiction of the PIU. The PMU and PIU will be further strengthened by Project Management Consultant (PMC) who will have dedicated environmental and social experts with appropriate qualification and experience for ensuring ESMF compliance in project implementation and submit relevant documents/ monthly reports to MPUDC. Capacity Building Training 17. MPUDC envisages capacity building on environmental and social safeguards and technical aspects for all the stakeholders in implementation of the subprojects including staff of contractor, ULB, PIU and PMU. It is proposed to organize annual sensitization programs, workshops and training programs, experience sharing, etc. in co-ordination with training institutions experienced in various aspects of urban infrastructure projects. 18. MPUDC also proposes enhancing capacity of staff and Environmental and Social Officers through orientation programs, trainings, exposure visits to similar projects implemented, courses and participation in both national and international training courses and seminars/workshops, etc. The proposed capacity building activities will be supported through Technical Assistance of MPUDP. ix ESMF Outcome of Stakeholders Workshop and Disclosure 19. The preparation of ESMF for MUPDP involved consultation with the stakeholders at various stages and focus group discussions with the potential subproject cities. In addition a multi-stakeholder workshop was organized at respective ULBs on July 11, 2016 to receive feedback on the draft ESMF including Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) and Indigenous Peoples Planning Framework (IPPF) and draft ESAs for the first three subprojects (Khargone and Burhanpur Water Supply and Chhindwara Sewerage subprojects). During the workshop, the stakeholders appreciated the provisions of entitlement to non-title holders also and expressed their overall satisfaction on the provisions of ESMF document. 20. The draft ESMF and ESAs for the first three subprojects are also disclosed at www.mpurban.gov.in on the website of Directorate of Urban Administration and Development of Madhya Pradesh and on the MPUDC website www.mpudc.co.in and also the at the project cities for feedback from the stakeholders. 21. A state level Multi stakeholder’s workshop on the Draft ESMF at the state level was also conducted on 7th September 2016. The final ESMF incorporating comments and feedback from the consultations was re-disclosed along with a non-technical executive summary in English and Hindi. x ESMF 1 Program Overview 1.1 Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Project (MPUDP) Madhya Pradesh (MP) is geographically the second largest, fifth populations, and eighth most urbanized state in India. Although MP recorded a higher rate of growth for its urban compared to rural population in the last decade, its urbanization rate is still below the national average but it is projected to catch-up in the next 15 years. At present, MP’s total urban population is of 20.1 million (28% of total population) concentrated in 476 urban centers as follows: 378 municipal bodies of which 16 are Municipal Corporations (Nagar Palik Nigams), 98 are Municipal Councils (Nagar Palika Parishad), and 264 are Nagar Parishads, and 98 Census Towns - identified as areas with urban characteristics, but not formally notified as urban. Of the 16 Municipal Corporations, four (Indore, Bhopal, Jabalpur, and Gwalior) are million-plus cities. In the cities in MP, household access to piped water supply ranges between 35 to 150 lpcd; access to underground sewerage range between zero to 40%; waste collection ranges between 85-90%, and 60-80% of rainwater runoff is effectively drained. Rapid urbanization has resulted in increasing pressure on existing urban infrastructure which not only needs to be conserved but augmentation is the utmost need. Augmentation of Water Supply with achievement of Service levels, providing safe and clean environment through underground sewerage and waste water treatment, Management of Municipal Solid waste, Sanitation are the key infrastructure sectors which need immediate attention. To respond to these challenges, GoMP undertook an ambitious reform program under the aegis of the Urban Development and Housing Department (UDHD). This program focused on accessing urban sector central schemes, and setting-up three state missions to respond to the needs of towns which could not be covered under the centrally schemes. Infrastructure requirements off all the large and medium towns/cities not covered under existing central schemes was identified and actions taken to develop these projects. In this context, GoMP opted to reach out to various Multilateral Institutions including World Bank to help them with institutional development and strengthening MPUDC that will manage the implementation of these projects and support sustainable urban infrastructure investments in participating ULBs. The State Government has proposed MPUDP seeking financial assistance from The World Bank, with development objective to enhance the capacity of the relevant State-level institutions to support ULBs in developing and financing urban infrastructure. The project development objective (PDO) is to enhance the capacity of MPUDC to improve coverage of key urban services and increase the revenue of participating urban local bodies. The project MPUDP will have two components: (i) institutional development; and (ii) urban investment. These components are summarized below: Component 1: Institutional Development Component: This component will have two subcomponents: (a) Subcomponent 1.1 - Policy Reforms: This subcomponent will provide support in areas such as (i) property tax; (ii) user charges; (iii) advertisement tax; (iv) accounting; (v) budgeting; and (vi) credit improvement. Overall support will be extended to a total of 51 ULBs in reform areas (i) to (iv) which include all ULBs qualifying for support under the Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation Mission in Madhya Pradesh as well as ULBs who have submitted requests to state government for project investment support under MPUDP. Support on areas (v) will be extended to around 1 ESMF five ULBs and (vi) will be extended to 2-3 ULBs from within the list of the above- mentioned 51 ULBs. Support under this sub-component will encompass both policy reform initiatives within Municipal Reforms Cell at the State level and dedicated capacity building at regional and ULB levels. Such capacity building will include: legal and policy changes; production of manuals and guidelines, trainings, and provision of qualified staff to implement the reforms. (b) Subcomponent 1.2 - Institutional Strengthening of MPUDC: This subcomponent will aim at: (i) strengthening the institutional capacity of MPUDC to function as the nodal urban infrastructure implementation agency in MP; (ii) building project management capacities within MPUDC; and (iii) provide technical assistance to MPUDP to develop a regional urban and economic development plan and related investment proposals for the Bhopal Indore Super Corridor (BISCO) region. Component 2: Urban Investments: (a) Component 2.1: Urban Investments: This component will provide investments to participating ULBs to implement subprojects in a range of urban services, including water supply, sewerage and septage management, drainage, solid waste management, amongst others. Selection of subprojects will be based on demand from ULBs, and will be assessed in accordance to technical, financial, social, and environmental screening criteria laid down in the Operations Manual of MPUDC. GoMP intends to provide up to 82.5% of the total subproject cost as a grant to the ULB while the balance will come as ULB contribution. The ULB contribution intends to ensure its ownership and participation throughout the subproject cycle. ULBs have authorized MPUDC to implement the subprojects on their behalf. While all subprojects are not known at this point, 25 ULBs have indicated interest in accessing water and sanitation investments through the proposed Project as given in Chapter 2. 1.2. Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) for MPUDP The Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) prepared for MPUDP shall help in screening, assessment, management of environmental and social issues of the project at an early stage in project planning and integrated appropriate measures during the subproject design, implementation and operation. The framework will help provide specific guidance on the policies and procedures to be followed for environmental and social assessment along with roles and responsibilities of the implementing agencies. 1.2.1 Objectives of ESMF The main objectives of the ESMF for MPUDP are to  avoid any direct, indirect, potentially adverse and irreversible environmental and social impacts / risks of projects that it lends to;  minimize or mitigate adverse environmental and social impacts / risks;  ensure that environmental and social management plans meet the relevant requirements of regulations of GOI and the MP State, and environmental and social safeguard requirements of The World Bank;  guide ULBs, and other stake holders in preparing subprojects and / or activities for appraisal and in monitoring, reporting, and undertaking corrective actions, if any;  ensure that effective mechanisms are in place for safeguard compliance during project implementation, and to undertake corrective actions, if required; and  develop institutional capacity of stakeholder institutions on safeguard compliance 2 ESMF To help understand, environmental and social issues associated with MPUDP, the MPUDC has conducted an Environmental and Social Assessment (ESA) of the first year project activities, analyzed the environmental and social profile of likely project cities of MPUDP, and on this basis, an Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) has been prepared, that ensures compliance of all project activities with the environmental regulations of GOI and the safeguard policies of The World Bank. 1.3. Details of Subprojects under MPUDP As described earlier, the sub component 2.1 of Component 2 is for Urban Investment which envisages development of urban infrastructure, which is the major activity of MPUDP, which is likely to cause environmental and social impacts. Under this sub component, 25 ULBs have shown interest to avail funds for infrastructure development. These subprojects include 7 Water Supply and 18 Sewerage projects.(Refer Table 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 and Figure 1.1) Out of the above 25 subprojects, three Subprojects (Khargone, Chhindwara and Burhanpur) are considered as first year subprojects. Detailed Project Reports (DPRs) and ESAs are prepared for these three subprojects. Subproject preparation for five towns, Maheshwar, Mandsaur, Seondha, Shajapur, Nasrullaganj are also in advanced stage and safeguard assessments for these subprojects will be initiated during the implementation phase of MPUDP. Remaining 17 likely subprojects are in the preliminary stages of preparation. For these towns preliminary screening and investigations were conducted to understand the environment and Social issues and to inform preparation of the ESMF for MPUDP. Table Error! No text of specified style in document.-1.1: Subprojects under First Year of MPUDP Financing S. No. Name of ULB Sector Population (Census 2011) 1 Burhanpur Water 210,286 2 Khargone Water 106,454 3 Chhindwara Sewerage 215,843 Table 1.2: MPUDP Subproject under Advance Stage of Preparation S. No. Name of ULB Sector Population (Census 2011) 1. Maheshwar Sewerage 24,411 2. Seondha (sewda) Water 23,140 3. Shajapur Sewerage 69,263 4. Nasrullagunj Sewerage 23,788 5. Mandsaur Sewerage 141,667 6. Bhedaghat Sewerage 6,657 7. Dharampuri Sewerage 16,363 8. Patera Water Supply 16,762 9. Nagda Sewerage 100,039 3 ESMF Table 1.3: Potential Subprojects under Screening Stage S.No Name of ULB Type of Project Population Proposed (Census 2011) 1. Badamalhera Water 18,335 2. Morena Water Supply 248,200 3. Sheopurkala Water Supply 68,820 4. Shahdol Sewerage 86,681 4 ESMF Figure 1.1: Location of Subproject Towns 5 ESMF 2 Environmental and Social Profile of MPUDP 2.1. Baseline Profile of Subproject Towns In order to understand the likely environmental and social impacts of MPUDP activities, broad base line environmental and social profile of identified subprojects towns was analyzed and is presented in this section. This will help early evaluation of such adverse impacts and integrate suitable mitigation measures during planning stage itself. As presented in the earlier sections, the subprojects are expected to be spread across the state of Madhya Pradesh in India. MPUDP would mainly support the development basic infrastructure proposed for Water Supply and Sewerage infrastructure in towns that mean the eligibility criteria set out for MPUDP. For the purposes of understanding environmental and social profile of MPUDP towns, available secondary data on different environmental and social aspects was reviewed, screening of key environmental and social issues was carried out and consultation were conducted with different stakeholders. While the baseline profile of 8 subprojects (three to be implemented in first year and five in advanced stage of preparation) is presented in table 2.3, the base line profile and initial screening of remaining 17 MPUDP towns is presented in Volume of 2 of the ESMF. 6 ESMF Table 2.1: Base Line Profile of Subproject Towns (First Year & Subprojects in Advanced stage of Preparation) S.no Particulars Burhanpur Chhindwara Khargone Maheshwar Mandsaur Nasrullaganj Seondha Shajapur (Sewda) 1 ULB Status Municipal Corporation Municipal Corporation Municipal Council Municipal Council Municipal Council Nagar Parishad Nagar Parishad Municipal Council 2 Type of Project Water Supply Sewerage Water Supply Sewerage Sewerage Sewerage Sewerage Sewerage 3 District /Division Burhanpur/Indore Chhindwara/Jabalpur Khargone/Indore Khargone/Indore Mandsaur/Ujjain Sehore/Bhopal Datia/Gwalior Shajapur/Ujjain 4 Location Lat.-2345’-50” to Lat.-2325” to 2433” N Lat.-2149’30”N Lat.-2122’ to Lat.-23 45’-50” Lat.-2231’ to Lat.- 25o 28’ to Latitudes 23o25” Coordinates 2502’-50” N Long.-75.25” E Long.- 2233’ N to 25 02’-50” N 2340’N 26 o 20’ N North and Longitude 75o25” Long.-74 42’-30” 7530’45”E Long.7519’ to Long.-74 42’-30” Long.-7622’ to long.-78 o 10’ to East, 7614” E to 75  50’-20” E 7808’E 78 o 45’ E to 75 50’-20”E 5 Population 210886 175052 116150 24411 141667 23788 23140 69263 6 Sex ratio 963 923 929 947 932 887 833 920 7 Literacy Rate (%) Total: 71.13 70.05 63.05 60 82 73 71.8 68 Male: 53.94 Male: 77 Male: 72.9 Male: 87.5 Male: 53.33 Male: 57 Male: 60.10 Male: 55.02 Female: 46.06 Female: 63 Female: 57.1 Female: 68.2 Female:45.67 Female: 42.99 Female: 38.89 Female: 44.97 8 Share of ST 2179 19111 10583 2734 1812 1396 369 977 population to total population 9 Share of SC 14440 22408 8816 2863 12684 2961 4281 9714 population to total population 10 Work Force 32.91 20.71 32 38.65 35.20 31.04 32.81 32.07 Participation(%) 11 Climatic Zone Warm & Humid Warm &Humid Warm & low Warm &Humid Warm Warm &Humid Warm Warm humidity 12 Average Elevation 265 M 360 meter 260m 1,057 meters 265 M 440 m 168m 435 meters above MSL 7 ESMF S.no Particulars Burhanpur Chhindwara Khargone Maheshwar Mandsaur Nasrullaganj Seondha Shajapur (Sewda) 13 Road Accessibility well connected with National Highway – SH-1 (Kasarwad National Highways National Highways on SH - 22 which NH3 Agra National Highway Mumbai through 547,347; Connecting Bistan road). No 3 (NH-3) No 76 (NH-76) connects to NH - Mumbai No. 3 (Agra- National Highway Nagpur Jabalpur & and connected to connecting to connecting to 12 towards Bhopal Mumbai Road), Chhindwara Nagpur Indore with NH3 Mumbai and Indore Jaipur in the east, Indore 180 km from (Agra Mumbai in the west and Bhopal road). Sehore in the north 14 Municipal Area 18.50 sq. km. 110.27 sq km 1.247sq km 36.46 sq. km. 8.08 Sq. km 2.93Sq.Km 11.20 Sq. kms 15 Soil Characteristics red sandy soil and red rich clayey to gravelly, rich clayey to mixed red and rich clayey to rich clayey to rich clayey to rich clayey to loamy soil mixed red and black soil gravelly, mixed red black soil gravelly, mixed red gravelly, mixed gravelly, mixed gravelly, mixed and black soil and black soil red and black soil red and black soil red and black soil 16 Seismic Zone Zone III Zone II & Zone III Border Zone III Zone III Zone II Zone III Zone II Zone II 17 Adjacent Stream Tapti Kulbehra Kunda Narmada Shivna - - - 18 Whether a No Yes Yes No No No No No scheduled area? 19 Special Remarks A historical town on the 75% of the population District Historical and Famous for Lord A major drain cuts No special District banks of River Tapti, resides within the core area Headquarter religious town at the Pashupatinath on across the town characteristic Headquarter with a few of 11.33 sqkm (10% of banks of River the banks of river Archeological Survey total area). Remaining 25% Narmada Shivna. of India (ASI) protected population distributed in monuments villages spread over 90% of the total town area. 20 Key factors  Dependence on  Absence of Waste water  Lack of water  Absence of Waste  Absence of  Absence of  Dependence on  Absence of pertaining to the Ground Water management leading to supply water Waste water Waste water Ground Water Waste water proposal envisaged created health filthy conditions in the infrastructure management management management Scarcity management under MPUDP problems in some town restricting full leading to filthy leading to filthy leading to filthy specially leading to filthy areas percentage of  As Sewage flows in coverage of the conditions in the conditions in the conditions in during summer conditions in the magnesium very high nallas polluting ground town, rest of the town town the town  Lack of water town  Water Scarcity water leading to health people have to  Sewerage flows  Sewerage flows  Open disposal supply  Sewage being specially during issues and also unrest in go through directly into the directly into the of sewerage into infrastructure drained out to summer affect public hardshipsfor Narmada river, Shivana river, open nallas restricting full the nearest livelihood of collecting water mixing with fresh mixing with fresh developed coverage of the river, thus  Untreated Sewage being vulnerable group drained out to the nearest water, leading to water, leading to health problems town , rest will polluting the  Lack of adequate river, thus polluting the health issues health issues  Towns phasing not get river and also water supply river and also the water  Due to lack of problem of sufficient water the water supply infrastructure supply source for the sewerage system Open tap water source for the 8 ESMF S.no Particulars Burhanpur Chhindwara Khargone Maheshwar Mandsaur Nasrullaganj Seondha Shajapur (Sewda) restricting full town maximum Defecation supply town coverage of the town, individual toilets  Untreated rest of the people depend on septic ground water have to gothrough tanks which leading to hardship to collect pollutes ground health issues water water and give  Untreated ground rise to health water leading to issues health issues 21 Key Environmental  Dependence on  Absence of Waste water  Dependence on  Absence of Waste  Absence of  Absence of  Dependence on  Absence of Issues pertaining to Ground Water and management leading to Ground Water water Waste water Waste water Ground Water Waste water proposal envisaged increasing population air and water pollution in and increasing management management management and increasing management under MPUDP has resulted in over the town population has leading to air and leading to air and leading to air population has leading to air exploitation of  Sewage mixing with resulted in over water pollution water pollution and water resulted in over and water ground resources. ground water, leading to exploitation of Sewage mixing  Sewage being pollution exploitation of pollution  Water Scarcity health issues ground with ground water drained out to the  Sewage mixing ground  Sewage mixing specially during resources.  Sewage being nearest river, thus with ground resources. with fresh  Sewage being drained summer out to the nearest river,  Water Scarcity drained out to the polluting the water, leading  Water Scarcity water, leading thus polluting the river specially during nearest river, thus river and to health issues specially to health issues and affecting the aquatic summer polluting the river affecting the during summer life and affecting the aquatic life aquatic life 22 Proposed Project  Source: Tapti River  Sewerage Network and  Source: Kunda  Centralized  Decentralized  Centralized  Source: Sindh  Decentralized  Anicut on river Tapti STP are proposed in River System System System River System  Intake Well: 8 m Dia first year project.  Intake Well: 8  STP: 4.25 MLD  STP-1: 21.1  STP: 5 MLD  Anicut: 4.5m  STP-1: 11.50 and 12 m height  Septage management m Dia and 12 m  Network length: MLD (SBR)  Network height and 150 MLD  WTP: 50 MLD supported with four Bio height 46661.00m  Five DEWATS length: m length  WTP: 30 MLD  Intake Well: 5  STP-2: 1.00  Distribution digesters is proposed in are proposed: 46661.00m Network: 164099 m latter stage of project.  Distribution Phytorid-1: 1.77 m Dia and 15 MLD  Network length: 266 km Network: 174 k MLD m height  Network  STP: 28.30 MLD m Phytorid-2:  WTP: 6.00 length: 109.  SPS: 2 nos 2.12MLD MLD 88 km Phytorid-3: 0.22  Distribution MLD Network: 33.4 Phytorid-4: 0.56 km MLD Phytorid-5: 1.54 MLD  Network Length: 199. 72 km 9 ESMF Table 2.2: Likely Economic and Social Impacts in Subproject Towns (First Year & 5 Subprojects in advanced stage of Preparation) S.no Particulars Burhanpur Chhindwara Khargone Maheshwar Mandsaur Nasrullaganj Seondha Shajapur 1 Need for Land take  On the basis of DPR  On the basis of DPR all  On the basis of  On the basis of  On the basis of  On the basis of  On the basis of  On the basis of all locations selected locations selected for DPR all DPR all DPR all DPR all DPR all DPR all for water works water works structure locations locations locations locations locations locations structure are in are in possession of selected for selected for selected for selected for selected for selected for possession of Revenue department, So water works water works water works water works water works water works Revenue there is no need of land structure are in structure are in structure are in structure are in structure are in structure are in department, So there take. possession of possession of possession of possession of possession of possession of is no need of land Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue take. department, So department, So department, So department, So department, So department, So there is no need there is no need there is no need there is no there is no need there is no need of land take. of land take. of land take. need of land of land take. of land take. take. 2 Relocation or loss  The alignment of  The alignment of pipe  The alignment  The alignment  The alignment  The alignment  The alignment  The alignment of shelter pipe lines will be lines will be finalized of pipe lines of pipe lines will of pipe lines of pipe lines of pipe lines of pipe lines finalized when when DRBo contractor will be be finalized will be finalized will be will be will be DRBo contractor get get into place. The joint finalized when when DRBo when DRBo finalized when finalized when finalized when into place. The joint survey will be DRBo contractor get contractor get DRBo DRBo DRBo survey will be conducted to finalize contractor get into place. The into place. The contractor get contractor get contractor get conducted to finalize the design and ESAs of into place. The joint survey will joint survey will into place. The into place. The into place. The the design and ESAs town get updated joint survey be conducted to be conducted to joint survey joint survey joint survey of town get updated will be finalize the finalize the will be will be will be conducted to design and ESAs design and conducted to conducted to conducted to finalize the of town get ESAs of town finalize the finalize the finalize the design and updated get updated design and design and design and ESAs of town ESAs of town ESAs of town ESAs of town get updated get updated get updated get updated 3 Loss of Assets or  The alignment of  The alignment of pipe  The alignment  The alignment  The alignment  The alignment  The alignment  The alignment Access to assets pipe lines will be lines will be finalized of pipe lines of pipe lines will of pipe lines of pipe lines of pipe lines of pipe lines finalized when when D(R)BO will be be finalized will be finalized will be will be will be D(R)BO contractor contractor get into finalized when when D(R)BO when D(R)BO finalized when finalized when finalized when get into place. The place. The joint survey D(R)BO contractor get contractor get D(R)BO D(R)BO D(R)BO joint survey will be will be conducted to contractor get into place. The into place. The contractor get contractor get contractor get conducted to finalize finalize the design and into place. The joint survey will joint survey will into place. The into place. The into place. The the design and ESAs ESAs of town get joint survey be conducted to be conducted to joint survey joint survey joint survey 10 ESMF S.no Particulars Burhanpur Chhindwara Khargone Maheshwar Mandsaur Nasrullaganj Seondha Shajapur of town get updated. will be finalize the finalize the will be will be will be updated. conducted to design and ESAs design and conducted to conducted to conducted to finalize the of town get ESAs of town finalize the finalize the finalize the design and updated. get updated. design and design and design and ESAs of town ESAs of town ESAs of town ESAs of town get updated. get updated. get updated. get updated. 4 Loss of income  As alignment of  As alignment of  As alignment of  As alignment of  As alignment of  As alignment  As alignment  As alignment sources or means of pipelines get pipelines get finalised pipelines get pipelines get pipelines get of pipelines get of pipelines get of pipelines get livelihood finalised by D(R)BO by D(R)BO contractor, finalised by finalised by finalised by finalised by finalised by finalised by contractor, the joint the joint survey gives D(R)BO D(R)BO D(R)BO D(R)BO D(R)BO D(R)BO survey gives exact exact assessment of contractor, the contractor, the contractor, the contractor, the contractor, the contractor, the assessment of Temporary Loss of joint survey joint survey joint survey joint survey joint survey joint survey Temporary Loss of income or livelihood gives exact gives exact gives exact gives exact gives exact gives exact income or livelihood assessment of assessment of assessment of assessment of assessment of assessment of Temporary Temporary Loss Temporary Loss Temporary Temporary Temporary Loss of income of income or of income or Loss of income Loss of income Loss of income or livelihood livelihood livelihood or livelihood or livelihood or livelihood 5 Presence of  Presence of ST  Presence of ST  Presence of ST  Presence of ST  Presence of ST  Presence of ST  Presence of ST  Presence of ST Scheduled Tribe and population in population in population in population in population in population in population in population in Scheduled Burhanpur is only Chhindwara is only Khargone is Maheshwar is Mandsaur is Nasrullaganj is Seondha is Shajapur is Castegroup with a 1.03%. 10.91% only 9.11% only 11.19% only 1.28% only 5.87% only 1.59% only 1.41% distinct, vulnerable,  SC Population -  SC Population –  SC Population -  SC Population -  SC Population -  SC Population  SC Population -  SC Population social and cultural 6.85% 12.80% 7.59 11.72% 8.95% – 12.45% 18.50% -14.02% characteristics and have lost there attachment to land because of forced severance. 6 Scheduled Tribe The STs do not exhibit The STs do not exhibit The STs do The STs do not The STs do The STs do The STs do The STs do groups are present typical characteristics typical characteristics not exhibit exhibit typical not exhibit not exhibit not exhibit not exhibit in, ohave collective such as living as a such as living as a typical characteristics typical typical typical typical attachment to, the group, speak separate group, speak separate characteristics such as living characteristics characteristic characteristics characteristics project area for language from language from such as living as a group, such as living s such as such as living such as living generations dominant population, dominant population, as a group, speak separate as a group, living as a as a group, as a group, having separate having separate speak separate language from speak separate group, speak speak speak institution in close institution in close language from dominant language from separate separate separate attachment to forest etc attachment to forest dominant population, dominant language language language etc population, having separate population, from from from 11 ESMF S.no Particulars Burhanpur Chhindwara Khargone Maheshwar Mandsaur Nasrullaganj Seondha Shajapur having institution in having dominant dominant dominant separate close separate population, population, population, institution in attachment to institution in having having having close forest etc close separate separate separate attachment to attachment to institution in institution in institution in forest etc forest etc close close close attachment to attachment to attachment to forest etc forest etc forest etc 7 Key Social  Temporary shifting  Temporary loss of  Temporary  Temporary loss  Temporary loss  Temporary  Temporary  Temporary loss safeguard Issues of Street Vendors livelihood to street Loss of of livelihood to of livelihood to loss of Loss of of livelihood to but not affecting vendors during pipe livelihood for street vendors street vendors livelihood to livelihood for street vendors their livelihood laying Street Vendors during pipe during pipe street vendors Street Vendors during pipe during laying of laying laying during pipe during laying laying  Scheduled Tribes  Loss of access rights in distribution laying of distribution and other narrow lanes network  Loss of access  Loss of access network  Loss of access disadvantaged rights in narrow rights in narrow  Loss of access rights in groups may be  the rights of Indigenous  Temporary lanes lanes rights in  Permanent loss narrow lanes excluded during people to be secure shifting of narrow lanes of property project planning and  Scheduled  Scheduled  Scheduled  Loss of public utility Street Vendors Tribes and other Tribes and other  Scheduled needing Tribes and implementation in congested lane during but not resettlement  Protection of ASI affecting their disadvantaged disadvantaged Tribes and and other pipe line laying. groups may be groups may be other disadvantaged monuments livelihood rehabilitation - excluded during excluded during disadvantaged partial or full groups may be  Scheduled project planning project planning groups may be excluded Tribes and and and excluded  Temporary during project other implementation implementation during project shifting of planning and disadvantaged planning and Street Vendors implementation groups may be  Loss of public  Loss of public implementatio but not excluded utility in utility in n affecting their during project congested lane congested lane livelihood  Loss of public planning and during pipe line during pipe line  Loss of public utility in implementation laying. laying. utility in  Land congested lane congested lane Acquisition, if during pipe line  Land  Land during pipe any laying. Acquisition, if Acquisition, if any, leading to any, leading to line laying.  STs and other  Land R&R R&R  Land disadvantaged Acquisition, if Acquisition, if groups may be any, leading to  Protection of  Protection of any, leading to excluded R&R Religious Religious R&R during project structures and structures planning and ASI monuments implementation 12 ESMF Table 2.3: Key Environmental Issues Likely to be faced in Subproject Towns (First Year & Subprojects in advanced stage of Preparation) S.no Particulars Burhanpur Chhindwara Khargone Maheshwar Mandsaur Nasrullaganj Seondha Shajapur 1 Key  Impact of drawl of  Protection of  Impact of  Sewer water  Protection of  Protection of  Impact of  Protection Environmental water from natural existing surface drawl of water drained out in existing existing drawl of of existing Issues stream, on the water resources / from natural open nallas surface water surface water from surface downstream natural drainage. stream, on the resources / water natural water population downstream  Waste natural resources / stream, on resources /  Sewer water drained population management drainage. natural the natural  Loss of vegetation out in open nallas including drainage. downstream drainage.  Protection of hazardous  Sewer water  Protection of  Waste management existing waste drained out  Sewer water population  Sewer existing surface including hazardous surface water disposal. in open nallas drained out  Protection of water water resources / waste disposal. resources / in open existing drained out natural drainage.  Pre-  Waste  Pre-construction natural construction management nallas surface water in open  Waste management stage activities drainage. stage activities including  Waste resources / nallas including hazardous impacting natural  Waste impacting hazardous management drainage.  Waste waste disposal topography, drainage management topography, waste including managemen and slope.  Presence  Water recycling / including drainage and disposal. hazardous of t including ground water  Deterioration of air hazardous slope.  Pre- waste wildlife in hazardous recharge quality due to dust waste disposal. vicinity, if waste disposal  Water construction any. disposal. considering scarcity and vehicular recycling / stage  Pre- of water resource. movement during  Water ground water activities construction  Waste  Pre- construction phase  Deterioration of air recycling / recharge impacting stage management constructio quality due to dust  Effect on flora and ground water considering topography, activities including n stage and vehicular fauna, cutting of recharge scarcity of drainage and impacting hazardous activities movement during trees considering water slope. topography, waste impacting construction phase scarcity of resource. drainage and disposal topography,  Sludge Disposal water  Water slope. drainage  Lack of sanitation resource.  Deterioration recycling /  Water and slope. facilities in labour  Lack of sanitation of air quality ground water  Water recycling / camps may lead to facilities in labour  Deterioration due to dust recharge recycling / ground water  Water pollution in the camps may lead to of air quality and vehicular considering ground recharge recycling / nearby vicinities pollution in the due to dust movement scarcity of water considering ground nearby vicinities and vehicular during water recharge scarcity of water 13 ESMF S.no Particulars Burhanpur Chhindwara Khargone Maheshwar Mandsaur Nasrullaganj Seondha Shajapur  Impacts on flora movement construction resource. considering water recharge and fauna, due to during phase scarcity of resource. considering construction  Deterioration water scarcity of cutting of trees phase  Impact on of air quality resource.  water  Protection of ASI flora and due to dust Deterioration resource. monuments  Lack of fauna due to, and vehicular  Deterioratio of air quality sanitation cutting of movement n of air due to dust  Deterioratio  Impact WTP sludge facilities in trees during quality due and vehicular n of air disposal including labour camps construction to dust and movement quality due iron sludge may lead to  Sludge phase vehicular during to dust and generated due to pollution in Disposal movement construction vehicular high iron content in  Impact on the nearby  Protection of flora and during phase movement raw water vicinities construction during ASI protected fauna due to,  Lack of monuments phase constructio  Impacts on cutting of sanitation n phase and religious  Impact  Treatment and flora and places trees on facilities in Disposal of fauna, cutting flora and labour camps  Affect on  Sludge backwash of water of trees  Lack of Disposal fauna due to may lead to flora and from WTP sanitation cutting of pollution in fauna, facilities in  Protection of trees the nearby cutting of labour camps religious vicinities trees  Sludge may lead to places Disposal  Impact on  Sludge pollution in the nearby  Lack of  Lack of flora and Disposal sanitation fauna, due to vicinities sanitation cutting of facilities in facilities in labour camps trees labour may lead to camps may  Lack of pollution in lead to sanitation the nearby pollution in facilities in vicinities the nearby labour camps vicinities may lead to pollution in the nearby vicinities 14 ESMF 2.2. Potential Environmental and Social Issues in MPUDP Subprojects Based on the environmental and social profile of the MPUDP towns, presented in Tables 2.1 to 2.3 above, the likely environmental and social issues associated with the MPUDP towns are summarized below. 1. The subproject towns are not located in ecologically sensitive areas and no significant impacts are anticipated on such sensitive features. However, the intake structure for the Morena Water Supply Project (which is in the early stage of preparation) is located in Chambal Wildlife Sanctuary for Crocodiles. This would require careful planning of the subproject in locating the intake structure and appropriate management plan to avoid impacts on the crocodiles both during construction and operation phase of the subproject. 2. Three of the MPUDP towns (Burhanpur, Maheshwar and Amarkantak) are culturally important due to the presence of monuments listed classified as protected by Archeological Survey of India. This would entail designing the projects to avoid impacts on these protected monuments, and also additional precautions during construction phase of the subprojects. 3. None of the project towns and subproject facilities are likely to be located in forest areas and / or envisage acquisition of forest lands. Due care, however will be taken during the planning and design of the MPUDP subprojects, so that the that none of the major components such as Water Treatment Plant or Sewerage Treatment Plant etc., that require larger area of forest lands or on a land with dense cover of trees. Care will also be taken to avoid the forests in the alignment of pipelines. However, in case, it is essential and unavoidable, all necessary mitigations measures will be integrated in the project design and permissions will be taken from appropriate authorities. 4. Except for components of water source and Sewage treatment plant development, most impacts are likely to result from considerable constructions activities in urban areas. Although construction of MPUDP components will involve quite simple techniques of civil works, central parts of the 25 towns are characterized as densely populated areas and thoroughfares congested with pedestrians, traffic and activities thus may result to impacts due to invasive nature of excavation and trenching work for water pipes and sewers. However as most of the individual elements are relatively small and involve simple construction, the potential environmental impacts are likely to be (i) localized and not very significant; and (ii) moderate impacts during construction in urban areas. 5. Likely to cause temporary loss of livelihood to street vendors during laying of distribution networks. 6. Temporary disruption of structures and utilities along the roadside. 7. Interests of Scheduled Tribes and other disadvantaged people present in the participating towns if not be appropriately consulted may get compromised. 8. Land take – either by acquisition of private land or by usage of existing government land that has already been encroached upon or has squatters may result in adverse impacts on owners or occupants on the land, if not appropriately mitigated 9. ESA for projects in Year 1 indicated that likely adverse social impacts are as follows: a. Encroached structure coming along road ROW such as Temporary shifting of vendors (Burhanpur, Khargone and Chhindwara; b. Loss of income due to obstruction of access to commercial establishments owing to temporary blocking of lanes (Burhanpur, Khargone and Chhindwara); and c. Impact on standing crops (Chhindwara). 10. However, as the possibility of land acquisition (LA) and resettlement and rehabilitation (R&R) cannot be ruled out in subsequent projects, the Resettlement Policy Framework 15 ESMF (RPF) has been prepared. Similarly though there are no indigenous peoples are present in the project area in accordance with characteristics outlined in Bank. OP 4.10, hence no Indigenous Peoples Plans (IPPs) have been prepared for Year I subprojects; instead an Indigenous Peoples Policy Framework (IPPF) has been prepared. The initial profile and screening of all potential subproject towns is presented in Volume 2 of the ESMF. 16 ESMF 3 Environmental Management Framework 3.1. Guiding Principles The MPUDC as an organization is committed to the following Guiding Principles in developing urban infrastructure in MP: (a) The Precautionary Principle or “Do no harm” principle, when a project poses threat of harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures will be introduced even if all cause and effect relationships may not be fully established on scientific grounds. (b) The Preventive Principle: to make every effort to avoid project activities in Eco- Sensitive areas and avoiding activities (project components) that are regulated or prohibited by National or State Laws, preventing adverse E&S situations by revisiting the project concept, minimizing the release of polluting wastes to amounts that do not affect the environment adversely, avoiding or minimizing resettlement of people due to land take, conserving natural resources and protecting biodiversity and/or minimizing health and safety hazards. (c) The Mitigative Principle; mitigating adverse E&S impacts by appropriate design modifications and meeting required national/state policies and legislations, incorporating Environment Management Plans (EMPs) and Social Management Plans (SMPs) into the Project Cycle, and following international/national best practices without affecting the financial viability of the project. This principle also extends to evaluating the impacts/risks that may result from the implemented mitigation measures themselves. (d) The Participatory Principle; ensuring public participation and community consultation, as applicable and relevant, which will be free of external manipulation, interference, or coercion, and intimidation, and conducted on the basis of timely, relevant, understandable and accessible information. (e) The Compensatory Principle; assisting project-affected persons in improving or at least restoring their livelihoods and standards of living in real terms relative to pre- displacement levels or to levels prevailing prior to the beginning of project implementation, whichever is higher, wherever relevant and within the scope of the project (f) The Restorative Principle; restoring the natural condition of the project site and associated facilities after completion of construction and decommissioning, wherever relevant and within the scope of the project (g) The Disclosure Principle; providing access to stakeholders for relevant information on purpose, nature and scale of project; duration of proposed activities; any risks to and potential impacts on affected communities; grievance redress mechanism; stakeholder engagement process; and Project E&S performance The ESMF of MPUDP will operationalize the above guiding principles. 3.2. The ESMF Process This volume presents the elements of the ESMF, environmental and social safeguards of MPUDP and the respective regulatory requirements along with guidance on preparation of 17 ESMF mitigation / management plans and their execution. The following Process flow chart shows the Environmental and Social Management Framework Process: Figure 3.1: Environmental and Social Management Framework Process 3.3. Environment Management Framework The environmental management framework is designed to incorporate environmental considerations into the project planning, design and implementation process. The objective is that the project along with all its components are in compliance with the applicable legislation at the National and State level, as well as the environmental safeguards required by the corresponding lender (based on the program under which the project is taken up). The ESMF also addresses gaps between the national environmental regulatory requirements and the environmental safeguard best practices of World Bank. The following sections highlights such actions incorporated in the ESMF. 1. The screening criteria for infrastructure development projects under the Environment Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 of GoI does not entail conduct of Environment Impact Assessments (EIAs) for obtaining Environmental Clearances (EC) for certain subprojects such as water supply and sewerage. As a result, such projects do not require an EIA/EC as per national regulations. The environmental safeguard policies of World Bank, however, require an environmental assessment for any physical infrastructure project, if it is expected to generate any adverse environmental impacts. The ESMF therefore applies to above mentioned sectors as well and recommends appropriate environmental planning procedures for such projects. 2. The World Bank environmental safeguard policies require the engagement of all project stakeholders early in the project cycle, namely, at the scoping stage of an EA through consultation. In this context, ESMF requires consultations with project stakeholders including project-affected persons (PAPs) during the formulation of an EA for a project submitted for MPUDP projects. 18 ESMF 3. The ESMF requires an EMP developed as part of EA to be incorporated in the contract documents (for the EPC contractor as well as the O&M agency) to make its implementation mandatory. MPUDC will monitor the effectiveness in implementation of the EMP. The ESMF also provides for an annual environmental audit in order to achieve compliance with environmental standards and to document lessons learned for future projects. 3.3.1. Environmental Regulations Various regulations have been established and enforced by Government of India till date. Particularly, the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification 2006 and amendments thereof are aimed at preventing and controlling environmental impacts of developmental projects. There are other Acts and Rules that are designed to address various thematic areas under the environment. A list of relevant environmental regulation in India and their details are presented in Table 3.1 3.3.2. Requirements under EIA Notification 2006 and Amendments The Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) is the prime regulatory body of GOI for formulating environmental policies, laws and rules, and for issuing prior environmental clearance (EC) for any developmental project, as in the Schedule I of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, dated 14 September 2006 (and its various amendments) under the Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986. The other environmental regulations in India for the various project categories under urban infrastructure developed by ULBs, is presented in Table 3.1 and applicable state regulations, include the following: MP State Regulation:  Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Madhya Pradesh Rules, 1975  Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution)(Consent) Madhya Pradesh, Rules, 1975  Madhya Pradesh State Prevention and Control of Water Pollution Board and Its Committees (Meetings) Rules, 1975  Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Madhya Pradesh Rules, 1983  Madhya Pradesh Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Appeal Rules, 1976  Madhya Pradesh Jaiv Anaashya Apashistha (Niyantran) Act & Rule  Madhya Pradesh Jaiv Anaashya Apashistha (Niyantran) Adhiniyam, 2004  Madhya Pradesh Jaiv Anaashya Apashistha (Niyantran) Niyam, 2007  Madhya Pradesh State, NO.997/2013/32 Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) (Notification,) Adhiniyam, 1974 Table 3.1: Key Environmental Regulations of GoI / GoMP No. Act/ Rule/ Brief Applicability for Notification MPUDP 1 Water (Prevention It provides for the prevention and CFE and CFO from & Control of control of water pollution and the MPPCB for the Pollution) Act, 1974 maintaining or restoring of water for Construction and and Water any establishment. operation of STP and (Prevention & All activities that are being WTP 19 ESMF No. Act/ Rule/ Brief Applicability for Notification MPUDP Control of developed, implemented, Compliance to conditions Pollution) Rules, established, and/or operational, that and disposal standards 1975 would lead to generation, treatment stipulated in the CFE and of sewage or effluent and further CFO discharge into a stream or well or http://www.envfor.nic.in/ sewer or land should take legis/water/wat1.html cognizance of the provisions or this http://www.moef.nic.in/si Act/Rules and take required consent tes/default/files/fellowshi to establish or operate from the State ps/GSR%2058%20E.pdf Pollution Control Board/Committee. 2 Air (Prevention & All activities that are being Applicable for equipment Control of developed, established, and/or and machines potential to Pollution) Act, 1981 operational, that emit any air emit air pollution. pollutant should take cognizance of http://www.moef.nic.in/si this Act/Rule and take required tes/default/files/No%201 consent to establish/operate from the 4%20%201981.pdf State Pollution Control Board/Committee. 3 The Environment It provides for the protection and STPs should be designed Protection Act, 1986 improvement of environment and and operated to meet and The the prevention of hazards to human disposal standards Environment beings, other living creatures, plants Compliance with Protection Rules, and property. emission and disposal 1986 standards during construction http://www.moef.nic.in/si tes/default/files/eprotect_ act_1986.pdf 4 Ancient Monuments Act for better and effective There are 292 protected and Archaeological preservation of the archaeological monuments including 3 Sites and Remains wealth of the country world heritage sites in Rules of 1959 state of MP Applicable to projects located in the proximity of protected monuments/ sites 5 Indian Wildlife Provides for the comprehensive Applicable to projects (protection) Act, protection of wild animals, birds and located within core or 1972 amended 1993 plants. buffer zone of protected and rules 1995 areas. There are 9 Wildlife (protection) National parks and 25 Amendment Act, Wildlife Sanctuaries in 2002 the State. 6 Indian Forest Act, Applicable to all forests – reserved Applicable to projects 1927 forest, village forests and protected located in the forests. forests. 7 The Hazardous It provides for regulation and control Some of the project Wastes of indiscriminate disposal of towns have existing AC 20 ESMF No. Act/ Rule/ Brief Applicability for Notification MPUDP (Management, Hazardous waste; and its sound pipes distribution lines, Handling and Trans management to reduce risks to therefore this act is boundary environmental and human health triggered to some Movement) Rules, subprojects. 2008 http://www.moef.nic.in/l egis/hsm.htm 8 The Manufacture, It deals with measures, regulations http://www.moef.nic.in/l Storage & Import of and controls so as to reduce egis/hsm/hsm2.html Hazardous environmental, safety and health Chemicals Rules, risks while manufacturing, handling 1989 and storage of hazardous chemicals. 9 Municipal Solid It provides for regulations on Solid waste generated at Waste (Management procedures to be undertaken for proposed facilities shall and Handling) proper management, handling, be disposed in Rules, 2000 processing and safe disposal of accordance with the A revised draft of municipal solid waste generated in MSWM rules the MSW Rules, Urban areas such that has minimum http://www.moef.nic.in/l 2016 environmental and health impact. egis/hsm/mswmhr.html 10 The Noise Pollution It provides for regulations to control Compliance with noise (Regulation and ambient noise levels in public places standards Control) Rules, from sources such as http://envfor.nic.in/downl 2000 industries/construction oads/public- works/community events, etc. information/noise- All activities/establishments that pollution-rules-en.pdf deal with sound emitting equipment while operational or during construction should take cognizance of the provisions/standards of these Rules and ensure compliance 11 Building and Other It regulates the employment and Applicable to any Construction conditions of service of building and building or other Workers other construction workers and construction works and (Regulation of provides for their safety, health and employ 10 or more Employment and welfare. workers, hence Conditions of applicable to project. Service) Act, 1996 http://clc.gov.in/Acts/sht m/bocw.php 12 Building and Other An Act to provide for the levy and Cess should be paid at Construction collection of a Cess on the cost of rate not exceeding 2% of Workers Welfare construction incurred by employers. the cost of construction Cess Act, 1996 as may be notified http://hrylabour.gov.in/do cs/labourActpdfdocs/Ces s_Rules.pdf 13 Workmen It provides for payment of Compensation for Compensation Act, compensation by employers to their workers in case of injury 1923 employees for injury by accident i.e. by accident personal injury or occupational http://labour.gov.in/uploa 21 ESMF No. Act/ Rule/ Brief Applicability for Notification MPUDP disease. d/uploadfiles/files/Actsan dRules/SocitySecurity/Th eWorkmenAct1923.pdf 14 The Child Labour It prohibits employment of children Employment of child (Prohibition & in certain specified hazardous labour is prohibited in Regulation) Act, occupations and processes and building or construction 1986 regulates the working conditions in works. others. http://labour.bih.nic.in/A cts/child_labour_prohibit ion_and_regulation_act_ 1986.pdf 3.3.3 World Bank Safeguard Policies The applicable safeguard policies of the World Bank are summarized in Table 3.2 overleaf. 22 ESMF Table 3.2: World Bank Safeguard Policies Safeguard Objective Applicability to the project Safeguard Requirements Policies OP 4.01 The objective of this policy is to ensure that The environmental issues will be addressed EIA and/or EMP required. Environmental Bank financed projects are environmentally adequately in advance. An integrated Assessment sound and sustainable. Environmental Screening and Environmental Assessment (EA) with Environmental Management Plan (EMP) will be developed to manage environmental risks and maximize environmental and social benefits wherever it is applicable. This policy is applicable to all the subproject towns. OP 4.04 Natural The policy recognizes that the conservation This policy may be triggered by the Project due EIA and EMP required Habitats of natural habitats is essential for long-term to activity requiring forest/ wildlife lands, sustainable development. The Bank, locating close to the natural habitats with the therefore, supports the protection, potential to cause significant adverse impact or maintenance and rehabilitation of natural degradation of natural habitats whether directly habitats in its project financing, as well as (through construction) or indirectly (through policy dialogue and analytical work. The human activities induced by the project). Bank supports and expects the Borrowers to apply a precautionary approach to natural resources management to ensure The proposed water supply project in for Morena environmentally sustainable development town, the intake structure for Water Supply is located in Crocodile Sanctuary. Detailed design of the subproject will be prepared to avoid /. Minimize impacts on the sanctuary and with suitable management plan to mitigate the impacts (if any) on the wild life. Necessary regulatory clearances will also be obtained from the regulatory authorities. 23 ESMF Safeguard Objective Applicability to the project Safeguard Requirements Policies OP/BP 4.11 This policy aims at assisting in the This policy may be triggered by subprojects Application has to be Physical preservation of cultural property, historical, where cultural property, historical, religious and prepared and submitted to Cultural religious and unique natural value-this unique natural value-this includes remains left Archaeological department Resources includes remains left by previous human by previous human inhabitants and unique in case any impact is inhabitants and unique environment environment features may be affected due to envisaged due to the project. features, as well as in the protection and project. Due to the presence of archeological enhancement of cultural properties monuments in Burhanpur and Maheshwar towns, encountered in Bank- financed project. this policy is triggered for the project. In addition to obtaining necessary Government of India permissions, the project will also incorporate ‘chance find’ provisions in the respective subprojects, to comply with the policy requirements of The World Bank. General EH & S The General Environment, Health and These Guidelines are technical reference Guide lines for Water and Guidelines Safety (EHS) Guidelines contain documents with general and industry-specific Sanitation projects available World bank information on cross-cutting environmental, examples of Good International Industry Practice at group health, and safety issues potentially (GIIP).The Guidelines contain the performance http://www.ifc.org/wps/wc applicable to all projects. levels and measures that are normally acceptable m/connect/e22c050048855a to World Bank Group and that are generally e0875cd76a6515bb18/Final considered to be achievable in new facilities at %2B- reasonable costs by existing technology. %2BWater%2Band%2BSan itation.pdf?MOD=AJPERE S 24 ESMF Safeguard Objective Applicability to the project Safeguard Requirements Policies OP / BP 7.50 The policy deals with two categories of Abstraction of water from rivers /tributaries When such a project is water bodies namely (i) international inland which are part of Ganga Basin proposed, beneficiary state World Bank waterways which included any river, canal, (prospective borrower) Policy for lake or other inland waterway; and (ii) should notify the other Projects on international waters which included bays, riparian countries of the International gulfs, straits, or channels bounded by project and provide them the Waterways several states, or if within one state project details. If the recognized as necessary channels of borrower does not wish to communication between the open sea and give notification, the Bank other states. can undertake such notification on behalf of the The Bank policy for projects on borrower, provided that the international waterways is based on two borrower requests the Bank. principles. The first element is the However, since either the recognition by the Bank that cooperation amount of water to be and goodwill of all riparians is essential for abstracted from the the efficient utilization and protection of the tributaries (of River Ganga) international waterway. The second is the in the towns where Water general rule that all riparians should be Supply is proposed under notified, subject to certain specified MPUDP is very little, or the exceptions, of Bank-financed projects on discharge of treated water international waterways. from the sewerage sub projects into the tributaries (of River Ganga) is very little, therefore, MPUDC has sought for exception to notifying the riparian countries. 25 ESMF 3.3.4. Environmental Categorization of Subprojects The urban infrastructure projects are expected to improve general living standards within urban localities. However, depending on location and the nature of project activities these projects will have varying impacts on environment. An underground sewerage scheme may cause impact due to disposal of treated effluent and sludge; water supply project may be associated with over exploitation of water resources and downstream users, and disposal of sludge etc. Similarly, construction activities may have impacts on the sensitive receptors and increase in air and noise pollution. The rigor of environmental assessment required to identify and mitigate the impacts largely depends upon the complexities of project activities. To facilitate effective screening and address the issues from infrastructure projects, MPUDP has categorized the projects into different categories – Ea, Eb and Ec linked to severity of impacts and regulatory requirements. The Ea, Eb and Ec categories are defined in table 3.3.1 Various projects depending on their sector, components involved, location vis-a-vis the surrounding environmental setting, will generate different adverse impacts that would need to be mitigated. Also, depending on the safeguards applicable (according to lender’s requirements) and environmental regulation applicable, the environmental significance of the project will vary. In order to enable a priority based project screening and assessment, project categorization criteria is proposed as explained in the section below to assign an environmental category to the projects: Table 3.3 Criteria for Environmental Category of Projects Environmental Environmental Impact Mitigation / Management Category of Significance Project Ea Environmental issues are likely to Stakeholders to be consulted early during be significant, diverse, the project preparation unprecedented and irreversible Project Specific EA / EMP to be carried indicating long term impact on out by independent agency environmental components Terms of Reference for the EA to be reviewed and cleared by The World Bank At least two stake holder Consultation to be carried out. Regulatory clearances to be sought as applicable Eb Environmental issues are of Project Specific EA / EMP to be carried moderate nature that can be out along with DPR with Stake holder mitigated with a reasonable effort Consultation. Regulatory clearances to be sought as applicable Ec Insignificant or negligible Generic Environmental Management 1 It should be noted that this categorization refers to the categorization of subprojects done for MPUDP, and should not be confused with the classification of overall Projects given in OP4.01 of the World Bank. As per safeguard policies of the World Bank, MPUDP has been categorized as a Category A project. 26 ESMF Environmental Environmental Impact Mitigation / Management Category of Significance Project environmental issues expected that Plan and good environmental practices require little or no mitigation to be integrated in the subproject The Environmental categorization will be done based on the Environmental screening of subprojects. Table 3.4 presents the environmental categorization of eight subprojects of MPUDP, whose designs are in advanced stage of preparation. Table 3.4: Environmental Categorization of Initial 8 subprojects* S.No. Subproject Categorization Remarks 1 Burhanpur Ea Subproject involves construction of anicut on Tapti Water Supply River, construction around protected monuments Scheme and therefore Environmental categorization is Ea 2 Khargon Water Eb Involves construction of intake well on Kunda Supply Scheme River, long transmission line and construction in dense urban areas, hence Environmental categorization is Eb 3 Sewda Water Eb Involves construction of anicut on Sindh River, long Supply Scheme transmission line and construction in dense urban areas, hence Environmental categorization is Eb 4 Chinddwara Ea Integrated Sewerage Subprojects involving Sewerage treatment plants, outfall sewers, and construction of Scheme deep sewer lines in dense urban areas. Hence, Categorized as Ea 5 Maheshwar Ea Sewerage Scheme 6 Mandsaur Ea Sewerage Scheme 7 Nasrullaganj Ea Sewerage Scheme 8 Shajapur Ea Sewerage Scheme Note: * - Indicative categorization to be finalized during the screening stage of the respective subproject. 27 ESMF Similar approach will be followed in the development of other subprojects and categorization will be done based on the project designs and sensitivity. All EAs and EMPs should be shared with the WB however in case of Ea category subprojects, the TOR should also be reviewed by the WB. EMPs will be integrated in the bid documents with appropriate BOQ provisions, to ensure that the EMP measures are implemented during the execution of the subproject. 3.3.5. Carrying out Environment Assessment and Preparation of Environment Management Plan EA for subprojects shall be prepared by independent consultants other than DPR consultants for Category Ea subprojects in line with the terms of reference (provided in Appendix 2 and customized to the project area conditions) to ensure that adequate management measures are identified to mitigate the subproject impacts. In case the EA is prepared by the DPR consultants, the EA shall be reviewed by an independent expert / agency to confirm ensure that all critical issues of environmental management are addressed in the subproject. For Eb category subprojects, the EA shall be prepared as part of the DPR preparation in line with the Guidance on Environmental Assessment, provided in the ESMF. The key elements of EA shall include, 1. Evaluation of project's potential environmental risks and impacts in the project area of influence, examines the alternatives, and identifies measures to mitigate the environmental impacts and improvement of benefits throughout project implementation. Wherever feasible, preventive measures would be undertaken. 2. The opinion of the stakeholders and public shall be incorporated in the project through specific public consultations with prior notice. Consultations in particular for category Ea subprojects should be carried out as early as possible including potentially for the TORs of the EA to be prepared. 3. In addition, the draft EA shall be made available in a public place accessible to affected groups and local non-governmental organizations (NGOs). 4. Implications of the available legislations and regulatory requirements and the requirements of the operational policies of the World Bank are also to be reviewed as part of the EA. The EA report shall meet the requirements of national and state level legislations and safeguard policies of The World Bank, including EHS Guide lines. All necessary clearances shall be obtained for EA, as applicable, prior to the initiation of procurement process for the respective subproject. The EA report shall include an executive summary, and sections on introduction/project background, project description including review of alternatives, review of legislations, baseline environmental conditions, impact evaluation, public consultation details, and Environmental Management Plan. 3.3.6. Guidance on Preparation of Environment Management Plan The management measures identified shall be made part of the project components and shall be included in the bid documents appropriately. Apart from addressing the issues, management measures shall also explore enhancement opportunities and their inclusion in project components would be ensured. The management plan shall consider various activities proposed under the project and provide management measures to be followed for different phases of implementation, along with the 28 ESMF responsibility allocation for implementation and Monitoring plan. Generic Environmental Management Plan formats for MPUDP, and customized versions for various urban infrastructure projects (including the details of EHS guidelines of WBG for Water and Sanitation Projects) are provided in Appendix 3. The cost for implementation of the management measures, the institutional arrangements for monitoring shall be included in the estimated project cost. 3.3.7. Environmental and Social Safeguard Issues in Technical Assistance (TA) Activities/Studies A number of technical assistance activities and studies are likely to be carried out by MPUDC as part of the component 1 of MPUDP (including various studies and plans under for BISCO), implementation of output from these studies could involve safeguard issues but may be financed/ implemented outside MPUDP. These studies shall be (i) prepared along with corresponding EA/SA and Resettlement Action Plan (RAP)/EMP in accordance with the provisions of the ESMF, (including screening and conducting ESAs as needed); (ii) outputs and reports of these studies will be submitted for Bank’s review and endorsement;(iii) approved by the competent authorities and disclosed. However, the implementation of the recommendation of RAPs / EMPs or other safeguard measures will be taken up as and when they are implemented depending upon the circumstance and are not subject to the Bank’s supervision. 3.3.8. Environmental and Social Safeguard Management Subproject Financed through Credit Enhancement Facility Sub-Component 2.1 of MPUDP envisages establishment of ‘Credit Enhancement Facility’ at MPUDC to help ULBs leverage commercial finance for various infrastructure projects. Similar to other activities of MPUDP, the provisions of ESMF will also be applicable to the subprojects financed through credit enhancement facility. While the green field subprojects prepared for the facility will follow the preparation requirements of the ESMF, subprojects involving refinancing transactions, would be reviewed to confirm that the safeguard issues / aspects comply with the ESMF provisions. All project funded activities would be in compliance with the agreed ESMF (that incorporates Bank’s OPs), even if not supervised by the Bank. 3.3.9. Application of OP 7.50: International Water Ways of The World Bank Operational policy covers the following types of international waterways: a) any river, canal, lake, or similar body of water that forms a boundary between, or any river or body of surface water that flows through, two or more states, whether IFC members or not; b) any tributary or other body of surface water that is a component of any waterway described in (a) above; and c) any bay, gulf, strait, or channel bounded by two or more states or, if within one state, recognized as a necessary channel of communication between the open sea and other states--and any river flowing into such waters. 29 ESMF The policy applies to the following types of projects: a) hydroelectric, irrigation, flood control, navigation, drainage, water and sewerage, industrial, and similar projects that involve the use or potential pollution of international waterways as described above; and b) Detailed design and engineering studies of projects under point (a) above as part of an IFC investment or of non-lending services. Exception to Riparian Notification: The nine subprojects where OP7.50 may apply, result in improvements in quality and access of water supply and/or sanitation systems in their respective urban centers (see table 3.5). The five water supply subprojects aim to augment existing subprojects aim to increase coverage of sanitation access in the towns, and improving the quality of liquid waste discharge. Hence, an exception to riparian notification may be considered. Specifically: Water Supply projects: a) The five sub-projects will result in an increased withdrawal of water from their respective tributaries. However, in all five cases, the amounts withdrawn from the sources are small (0.0009% to 0.04%) relative to the overall volume of flow, and do not have significant impacts that would warrant concerns downstream: b) India and Bangladesh are signatories to the Treaty on sharing of the Ganga Water at Farraka, wherein an agreement has been reached on basis of availability of flow at Faraaka Barrage. Based on values reported for minimum availability during 1949-1988. the minimum availability is 60,992 cubic feet/sec, which corresponds to 149,221 million liters per day. The combined water demand requirement for the current investments represents 0.07 percent of the minimum flow at Farakka Barrage, which is marginal: c) There are no impacts envisaged in countries upstream since the tributaries originates in India: d) All projects introduce metered connections that will lead to increase efficiency of end water use; and e) Barring Patera, all four other subprojects envisage shifting from ad hoc decentralized chlorination practices to centralized scientific water treatment process thus promoting a better controlled, more efficient and more cost- effective treatment. The five water supply sub-projects qualify for exception qualify for exception to notification of riparian countries under OP 7.50 as they involve additions or alterations to existing 30 ESMF schemes that do not adversely change the quality or quantity of water flows to the other riparians, and will not be adversely affected by the other riparians’ possible water use. Sanitation sub projects: a. The four sub projects will result in increased coverage of existing systems. They will lead to the treatment of all liquid waste currently discharged, untreated or partially treated, into the tributaries, thereby leading to abatement of pollution in the tributaries. b. Discharged, treated effluent from treatment plants does not have significant impact on receiving bodies that would warrant concerns downstream. The four sub-projects qualify for exception to notification of riparian countries under OP 7.50 as they involve additions or alterations to existing schemes that do not adversely change the quality or quantity of water flows to the other riparians, and will not be adversely affected by the other riparians’ possible water use. 31 ESMF Table 3.5: Details of MPUDP sub-projects likely to trigger OP 7.50 WATER SUPPLY PROJECTS Volumetric Volumetric Cost of water use water use Nature of Baseline Current Beneficiary Target Investment Investment (pre- (post- Proposed Source Investment Conditions Source Population Coverage (US$ million) project) project) (MLD) (MLD) · Centralized 98.4% scientific coverage River Chambal Morena (a tributary of River · water treatment Decentralized Ground Water 45.6 11.4 66 552,970 100% Yamuna which is a · distribution ad-hoc Water Supply tributary of River system chlorination Ganga) · metering · Centralized Over 90% scientific coverage Sindh River (a Sewda tributary of River · water treatment Decentralized Ground Water 2.86 1.63 6 37,000 100% Yamuna which is a · distribution ad-hoc Water Supply tributary of River system chlorination Ganga) · metering · distribution Vyarma River (a Patera system tributary of River Over 90% Ground Water 0.84 0.31 1.34 16,762 100% Ken which is a coverage Water Supply · metering tributary of River Yamuna) · Centralized scientific Kaithan/Dhasan Bada · water treatment River (a tributary of Malahara Over 90% Ground 2.92 1.4 6 37,000 100% River Betwa which is Water · distribution coverage Water a tributary of River Suply system Yamuna) · metering River Chambal Sheopur (a tributary of River kalan · Centralized Over 90% Ground 11.13 5 19 134240 100% Yamuna which is a Water scientific coverage Water tributary of River Supply Ganga) 32 ESMF SEWERAGE PROJECTS Volumetric Treated Cost of Current Nature of Baseline wastewater Beneficiary Target Investment Investment Disposal Proposed Discharge Point Investment Condition discharge Population Coverage (US$ million) Point (post-project) (MLD) 76% coverage of · septage decentralized 10 (likely to management treatment through River Chambal (a tributary of Nagda River increase to 12 13.29 septic tanks and 132,305 100% River Yamuna which is a Sewerage Chambal MLD by year · centralized piped sewer & tributary of River Ganga) 2034) liquid waste balance by twin-pit treatment toilets · septage 80% coverage of management decentralized 9 (likely to River Chillar is a tributary of Shajapur treatment through increase to 12 river Chambal (a tributary of · centralized 9.42 River Chillar 119,576 100% Sewerage septic tanks & 20% MLD by year River Yamuna which is a liquid waste coverage by twin- 2034) tributary of River Ganga) treatment pit toilets · septage 40% coverage of management decentralized 16 (likely to Shahdol treatment through increase to 20 Murna is a tributary of River Son · centralized 15.51 River Murna 172,300 100% Sewerage septic tanks & 60% MLD by year (a tributary of Ganga) liquid waste coverage by twin- 2034) treatment pit toilets · septage 60% coverage of management decentralized 18 (likely to treatment through River Shivna (a tributary of River Mandasaur increase to 22 · centralized 15.60 UGD and septic River Shivna 2,74,549 100% Chambal which is a tributary of Sewerage MLD by year liquid waste tanks & 40% River Yamuna/Ganga) 2034) treatment coverage by twin- pit toilets 33 ESMF 4 Social Management Framework 4.1. Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) The objective of Resettlement policy framework is to avoid if possible, if not minimizes impacts and finally mitigate the adverse social impacts on the population affected by the planning, design and implementation of the project. The framework emphasises that theinvoluntary resettlement will be avoided and minimised by exploring different designoptions. In other words exploring various options and considering the best option which hasminimum or no impact. The nature and magnitude of social impact will be assessed through social impact assessments. An RAP or Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan (ARAP) as applicable will be prepared incompliance with the Social Safeguards provided in this ESMF and implemented to mitigate the adverse impacts to assist theaffected people and to enable them to improve their living standards. The measures available in the RAP/ARAP shall be implemented prior to the commencement of civil works. The broadcategories of economic and social adverse impacts that would be mitigated are: a) Loss of land and assets b) Loss of shelter or homestead lands, c) Loss of income or means of livelihood d) Loss of access to productive resources, shelter/residences e) Loss of collective impacts on groups such as loss of community assets, common propertyresources and others. The Resettlement Policy Framework covers the following: 1. Addresses the gap between World Bank policy on the involuntary resettlement and existing country and state level regulations including RTFCLARR act 2013. 2. Defines project affected persons (PAPs), list their entitlements, details community participation and consultation in various stages of social impact assessment, supervision &monitoring of processes. 3. To avoid / minimize physical displacement and involuntary relocation to the maximum practical extent. 4. To explore different alternatives/options to avoid physical displacement and involuntary relocations (such as alternative route alignments, sites etc.) 5. To compensate and assistance to the PAPs irrespective of their legal rights 6. Ensures that PAPs will be resettled and rehabilitated with the aim of improving their livelihoods and standards of living or at least restored to before project status. 7. When PAPs lose land/structures and or displaced and/or economically affected adversely, detailed planning to be carried out along with implementation arrangements stated in the Resettlement Action Plan. 34 ESMF 8. Full cost of all resettlement activities necessary to achieve the project objectives are included in total project costs including contingencies and inflation. 4.2. Social Regulatory Framework The Subprojects that are financed under MPUDP needs to be consistent and complied with andmeet the requirements of the following applicable acts, notifications, and policies. Thecompensation and assistance provided to the project affected will be based on theapplicable acts, legislations, regulations besides the Operational Policies of the World Bank. National and State: 1. The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013. 2. The Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 3. The Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006. 4. Right to Information Act, 2005 5. Guidelines of Madhya Pradesh Nagariya Kshetro ke Bhoomihin Vyakti (Pattadhriti Adhikaron ka Pradan kiya jana) Adhiniyam, 1984 Operational Policies of the World Bank 1. 4.10 Indigenous People. 2. 4.12 Involuntary Resettlement. 3. World Bank Policy on Access to Information and Disclosure Table 4.1: Relevance of Applicable Social Legislations to MPUDP Acts, notifications, Relevance to project policies and guidelines National The Right to Fair The Act provides for enhanced compensation and assistances measures Compensation and and adopts a more consultative and participatory approach in dealing Transparency in Land with the Project Affected Persons. Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (RTFCTLARRAct 2013) 35 ESMF Acts, notifications, Relevance to project policies and guidelines The Street Vendors GOI recently enacted the act that specifically aims to protect the rights (Protection of urban street vendors and to regulate street vending activities. It ofLivelihood and provides for Survey of street vendors and protection from eviction or Regulation of relocation; issuance of certificate for vending; provides for rights and StreetVending)Act,2014 obligations of street vendors; development of street vending plans; organizing of capacity building programmes to enable the street vendors to exercise the rights contemplated under this Act; undertake research, education and training programmes to advance knowledge and understanding of the role of the informal sector in the economy, in general and the streetvendors, in particular and to raise awareness. The Scheduled Tribes An Act to recognise and vest the forest rights and occupation in forest And other Traditional land in forest dwelling Scheduled Tribes and other traditional forest Forest Dwellers dwellers who have been residing in such forests for generations but (Recognition of whose rights could not be recorded; to provide for a framework for Forest Rights) Act, recording the forests rights so vested and the nature of evidence 2006. required for such recognition and vesting in respect of forest land. MP Nagariyon Kshetra Madhya Pradesh is the only Indian state where a separate act has been ke Bhumiheen Vyakti passed by the state legislature for regularizing tenure of squatters on (Pattadhruti Adhikaron government land. GoMP has been granting leasehold land titles or ka Pradan Kiya Jana) Pattas to “landless persons” or residents of squatter settlements in Adhiniyam, 1984, urban areas on the basis of the MP Nagariyon Kshetra ke Bhumiheen popularly known as the Vyakti (Pattadhruti Adhikaron ka Pradan Kiya Jana) Adhiniyam, 1984, Patta Act. popularly known as the Patta Act. The Act applies to all urban areas of MP. The `Patta’ Act was introduced to grant leasehold rights to the landless persons occupying urban lands. The Act entitles all landless persons occupying less than 50 sq m of land on a specified cut of date to leasehold rights for residential use on the same land or on another site. The World Bank OP The proposed MPUDP is proposed tobe implemented by 4.12–Involuntary M P U D C and its agencies with the assistance of the World Bank. Resettlement Therefore, the provisions of this operational Policy will apply to subprojects financed under this project. The subprojects to be financed under the project might entail land acquisition or result in involuntary resettlement impacts though, at a smaller scale for the various project activities. It would also adversely affect structures used for various purposes, livelihood of people (mainly earning their livelihood by means of petty shops and providing various services). Many of them might have been operating from within the ROW or the government land. Thus both title holders and non-title holders alike would be affected as aconsequenceoftheproject.GoMP/UDHD(MPUDC) willensurethattheBankPoliciesarefollowed. 36 ESMF Acts, notifications, Relevance to project policies and guidelines OP4.10–Indigenous This policy ensures that the development process fully respects the Peoples dignity, human rights, economies, and cultures of Indigenous Peoples. For all projects that are proposed for Bank financing and affect Indigenous Peoples, the Bank requires the borrower to engage in a process of free, prior, and informed consultation. It applies for both positive and negative impacts on Indigenous People (IP) wherever the project activities are undertaken. World BankPolicy on World Bank safeguards policy requires consultation with PAPs during Access to Information planning and implementation of resettlement action plan and and Disclosure tribaldevelopment plan and public disclosure of drafts. Once the draft is prepared it is to be made available at a place accessible to, and in a form, manner and language understandable to the displaced or affected people and local NGOs. EP Act1986 and RTFCTLARR,2013 also requires disclosure of draft SIA and RAP and other project reports followed by mandatory Public Hearing. 4.2.1. Key Gaps Analysis of the existing national legal and regulatory framework vis-à-vis principle outlined in Bank’s OP 4.12 indicate the following key gaps  Cut-off date for those without recognized legal title: A major gap is that while WB recognizes all PAPs residing or depending on such lands as on census survey at the start of LA process, the LARR 2013 stipulates that such PAPs should be residing or depending on land for 3 years or more preceding land acquisition. Families who are depending on such lands for less than 3 years are not recognized as APs and will not be eligible for compensation or resettlement assistance.  Replacement costs: In case of land the valuation of land and buildings at market value (using an appropriate multiplication factor in case of land only) plus solatium provides compensation that exceeds the replacement cost or market value.  Temporary disruption: Temporary disruption to access to business leading to loss of income is another aspect that is not covered under country’s legal framework but would dealt with provisions of: i) alternate by the contractor and ii) commensurate payment for loss of income  Common Property Resources: While legal framework provides for compensation for any impacted common properties, under the project any replacement or relocation would be addressed/undertaken by the civil works contractor in consultation with the community. These above gaps are addressed through the project level entitlement framework. In addition, the State Government has a policy of payment of compensation to private landowners for user rights for underground pipe laying, while ownership remains with the private landowners, avoiding 37 ESMF involuntary/forcible land acquisition. This RPF recommends documentation of consultations with the concerned landowners from whom user rights to lay underground pipes are sought, and inclusion of evidence of compensation payment to them as specified by the policy in the / resettlement action plan, as applicable. 4.3 Categorisation of Subprojects During the screening process the social risks will be assessedthrough the screening formats submitted by the borrower along with the loan application. Screening formats are given in Appendix and screening checklist for project towns are provided in Volume-II. Based on the screening, the social category of the project isdetermined and necessary SIA and related RAP/ ARAPas applicable shall be prepared. Based on the magnitude of impact to the Project Affected Persons(PAPs) through screening of projects, projects have been categorised as either Sa, Sb or Sc outlined in Table 4.2.2 Table 4.2: Categorization of Subprojects Category Description Typeofproject Management Levelofissues measures Sa significant SIAand RAP 1. If it involves acquisition of private land or adverse impacts permanent loss of private assets and livelihood expectedexpect 2. If it involves physical displacementof200 and ed more PAPs are affected. Sb Moderate SIAand 1. if the affected people are not physically adverse social displaced and less than 10 percent of their Abbreviated impacts productive expected RAP. 2. if fewer than 200 people are displaced, Sc Nosocialissues SocialScreening Noprivatelandacquisitionornoimpactsto PAPs expectedhence Report Construction stage impacts on assets near ROW sociallybenign The social categorization will be done based on the social screening information provided by the ULB. However, based on the outcome of Social impact assessment, the category will be revisited at the time of appraisal of each subproject. 2 It should be noted that this categorization refers to the categorization of subprojects developed for MPUDP, and should not be confused with the classification of overall Projects given in OP4.01 of the World Bank. As per safeguard policies of the World Bank, MPUDP has been categorized as a Category A project. 38 ESMF 4.4 Social Impact Assessment and Resettlement Action Plan A social impact assessment will be undertaken for all projects with high to moderate social impacts to assess the potential social impacts of the proposed projects. Based on the outcome of such assessment the corresponding mitigation instrument -- Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan will be prepared for Sb Category Projects and Full Resettlement Action Plan will be prepared for Sa category projects. SIA process includes undertaking of the following steps: consultations with the stakeholders; Census survey of PAPs; Socio-economic surveys of the Project Affected Persons; and Focus Group Discussion with specific interest groups. In case the baseline Socio-Economic Survey data is more than two (2) years old at the time of implementation of the Project, the key socio economic data will be updated. Contents of the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) shall include the following as a basic minimum:  Executive Summary  Project description  Objectives and Study Methodology  Socio-Economic Profile of the project area  Regulatory Policies with respect to Social Safeguards  Proposed Improvements under the project  Options considered for minimizing adverse impacts  Assessment of Project impacts  Baselines Socio Economic Survey  Public Consultation & Disclosure and Plan  Nature and magnitude of impacts  Type of impacts  Compensation and R&R assistance  Livelihood Restoration and Income Generation Plan  Gender Dimensions and Action Plan  Grievance Redress Mechanism  Implementation Schedule and Budget  Institutional Arrangements  Implementation Arrangements  Monitoring and Evaluation Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plans (ARAPs) will be prepared where impacts on the entire displaced population are minor and less than 200 persons are affected; an ARAP would be prepared covering the following minimum elements: (i). A census survey of displaced persons and valuation of assets; (ii). Description of compensation and other resettlement assistance to be provided; (iii). Consultations with displaced people about acceptable alternatives; (iv). Institutional responsibility for implementation and procedures for grievance redress; (v). Arrangements for monitoring and implementation; and (vi). A timetable and budget. The SIA/RAP will be disclosed followed by a consultation and the suggestions, comments of the stakeholders will be incorporated in the RAP. The final RAP will be disclosed on the websites of the Urban Local Bodies, 39 ESMF Implementing agencies. The Hindi version of full report will also be disclosed in the project sites. 4.5. Land Compensation and Resettlement & Rehabilitation Planning Wherever Land Acquisition is involved in the projects, compensation for the land and related R&R to the PAPs will be made as per the provisions of the RFCTLARR 2013. The District Administration / concerned authorities will carry out private land acquisition and R&R implementation based on the provisions of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. The project affected assigned land owners will be treated similar to the project affected land-owners reference guidelines of Madhya Pradesh Nagariya Kshetro ke Bhoomihin Vyakti (Pattadhriti Adhikaron ka Pradan kiya jana) Adhiniyam, 1984 or refer to www.mpurban.gov.in/pdf/pattaactenglish.pdf. The need for resettlement and rehabilitation arises when the land which is acquired or alienated or transferred results in involuntary displacement and/or loss of livelihood, sources of income and access to common properties/resources on which people depend for economic, social and cultural needs irrespective of their legal status. Though the squatters and encroachers are not entitled to legal compensation for land that they have occupied, this policy will provide for resettlement and rehabilitation of such persons with the aim of improving their standard of living. This policy will also be applicable to those landowners from whom land would be acquired. In case of those affected families living in the lands reserved under Development Plans with or without approval of construction of structures will also be assisted for resettlement and rehabilitation as per the Entitlement Framework in this ESMF. Use of Government Lands - Very often, the lands belonging to other land owning departments are required to be used for various facilities to be proposed. Generally, necessary permissions and approvals for land alienation take a long time. In case of all Government lands, obtaining “‘Enter only upon Permission” from land owning agencies or other authorities concerned, prior to contract award is a pre-requisite and the land alienation or conditions for the same must be completed as soon as possible and prior to commencement of construction in those respective facilities / sites. The entitlement for different categories of impacts is explained in the following entitlement matrix. The principles of the entitlement matrix are in accordance with the RFCTLARR, 2013 and the Safeguards on Involuntary Resettlement (OP 4.12) and Indigenous People (OP 4.10) of World Bank. An entitlement matrix provides the entitlements for different impact categories in the following order.  Impact to title holders which covers o Loss of Land o Loss of Residential Structures o Loss of commercial structures  Impact to tenants and leaseholders a. residential b. commercial  Impacts to non-title holders o Residential squatters o Commercial squatters o Encroachers 40 ESMF  Impacts to trees, plants and standing crops  Loss of Livelihoods o Employers in shops, agricultural labourers, sharecroppers etc.,  Impacts to Vulnerable Households  Impacts to Community Assets  Temporary impacts  Unidentified impacts 4.6. Basis for Entitlement Framework For the purpose of the RAP under the ESMF of MPUDC, the following definitions will be applicable: 1. Affected area: means such area as may be notified by the appropriate Government for the purposes of land acquisition and which land will be acquired under RTFCTLARR Act, 2013 through declaration by Notification in the Official Gazette by the appropriate Government or for which land belonging to the Government will be cleared from obstructions; 2. Agricultural land: Means land used for the purpose of: (i) agriculture or horticulture; (ii) dairy farming, poultry farming, pisciculture, sericulture, seed farming breeding of livestock or nursery growing medicinal herbs; (iii) raising of crops, trees, grass or garden produce; and (iv) land used for the grazing of cattle; 3. Below poverty line (BPL) or BPL family: means below poverty line families as defined by the Planning Commission of India (now restructured as the Niti Ayog), from time to time and those included in the BPL list for the time-being in force; 4. Building: Means a house, out house or other roofed structure whether masonry, brick, wood, mud, metal or any other material whatsoever but does not include a tent or other portable and temporary shelter; 5. Corridor of impact (CoI): Refers to the minimum land width required for construction and laying of pipes including embankments, facilities and features such as approach roads, drains, utility ducts and lines, fences, green belts, safety zone, working spaces etc. Additional land width would be acquired/purchased or taken on temporary lease if the Corridor of Impact extends beyond the available Right of Way; 6. Cut-off date: (i) In the cases of land acquisition affecting land holders the cut-off date would be the last date of publishing Notification for land acquisition u/s 11 (1) of RTFCTLARR Act, 2013 in the local newspaper. Those without any legally recognized ownership documents the cut-off date would be the start date of the Census and Socio- Economic survey. For temporary impacts the cut-off date would be the date of joint inspection by contractor and PIU representative before initiating construction. 7. Encroacher: A person who has extended their building, agricultural lands, business premises or work places into public/government land without authority; 8. Income: Income of the PAP shall mean the amount prior to the cut-off date from all occupations taken together calculated by an objective assessment; 41 ESMF 9. Land: "land" includes benefits to arise out of land, and things attached to the earth or permanently fastened to anything attached to the earth 10. Land acquisition" or "acquisition of land": means acquisition of land under the RTFCTLARR, 2013. 11. Non-agricultural labour: means a person who is not an agricultural labour but is primarily residing in the affected area for a period of not less than five years immediately before the declaration of the affected area and who does not hold any land under the affected area but who earns his livelihood mainly by manual labour or as a rural artisan immediately before such declaration and who has been deprived of earning his livelihood mainly by manual labour or as such artisan in the affected area; 12. Notification: means a notification issued from time to time by appropriate government for land acquisition under the provisions of RTFCTLARR, 2013. 13. Project Affected Family (as defined in RTFCTLARR Act 2013): It includes- a. a family whose land or other immovable property has been acquired; b. a family which does not own any land but a member or members of such family may be agricultural labourers, tenants including any form of tenancy or holding of usufruct right, share-croppers or artisans or who may be working in the affected area for three years prior to the acquisition of the land, whose primary source of livelihood stand affected by the acquisition of land; c. the Scheduled Tribes and other traditional forest dwellers who have lost any of their forest rights recognized under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 due to acquisition of land d. family whose primary source of livelihood for three years prior to the acquisition of the land is dependent on forests or water bodies and includes gatherers of forest produce, hunters, fisher folk and boatmen and such livelihood is affected due to acquisition of land; e. a member of the family who has been assigned land by the State Government or the Central Government under any of its schemes and such land is under acquisition; f. a family residing on any land in the urban areas for preceding three years or more prior to the acquisition of the land or whose primary source of livelihood for three years prior to the acquisition of the land is affected by the acquisition of such land; 14. Affected Person (PAP): Any person affected either directly or indirectly by the project and/or project related activity, irrespective of the legal status and would include: a. Title holders, b. Encroachers, c. Squatters, d. Tenants, Leaseholders, Sharecroppers, e. Employees, Landless labourers, 42 ESMF 15. Affected Household (PAH): A social unit consisting of a family and/or non-family members living together, and is affected by the project negatively and/or positively; 16. Rent: Means whatever is lawfully payable in cash or in kind, partly in cash and partly in kind, whether as a fixed quantity of produce or as a share of the produce, on account of the use or occupation of land or on account of any right in land but shall not include land revenue; 
 17. Replacement Cost: A replacement cost/value of any land or other asset is the cost/value equivalent to or sufficient to replace/purchase the same land or other asset and other applicable taxes to be incurred by the affected person. As per the new RTFCLARR Act 2013, computation of all compensation with additional solatium is more than the replacement cost or market value of affected assets 18. Shop: Means any premises where any trade or business is carried on and where services are rendered to customers; 19. Squatter: A person who has settled on public/government land, land belonging to institutions, trust, etc., and or someone else’s land illegally for residential, business and or other purposes and/or has been occupying land and building/asset without authority; 20. Temporary Impact: Impact expected during implementation of the project in the form of earth spoil, tremors and vibrations, etc. affecting land and structure 21. Tenant: A person who holds/occupies land-/structure of another person and (but for a special contract) would be liable to pay rent for that land/structure. This arrangement includes the predecessor and successor-in-interest of the tenant but does not include mortgage of the rights of a landowner or a person to whom holding has been transferred; or an estate/holding has been let in farm for the recovery of an arrear of land revenue; or of a sum recoverable as such an arrear or a person who takes from Government a lease of unoccupied land for the purpose of subletting it. 22. Vulnerable Households: Vulnerable PAPs: Vulnerable PAPs are those living below poverty line, SC / ST families and women headed households, Widows, Physically Challenged persons; Elderly persons above the age of 60 years, 23. Wage earner: Wage earners are those whose livelihood would be affected due to the displacement of the employer. The person must be in continuous employment for at least six months prior to the cut-off date with the said employer and must have reliable documentary evidence to prove his/her employment. 4.7 Entitlement for Project Affected Persons (PAPs) The entitlement for different categories of impacts is explained in the following entitlementmatrix. The principles of the entitlement matrix are in accordance with the RTFCTLARR, OP 4.12 of the World Bank. The entitlement matrix presents the entitlements fordifferent impact categories in the following order: 1. Impact to title holders which covers a. Loss of Land b. Loss of Residential Structures c. Loss of commercial structures 43 ESMF 2. Impact to tenants and leaseholders a. residential b. commercial 3. Impacts to non-title holders a. residential squatters b. commercial squatters c. encroachers 4. Impacts to trees, plants and standing crops 5. Loss of Livelihoods (Permanent loss and Temporary disruption to income) a. employers in shops, agricultural labourers, sharecroppers etc., 6. Impacts to Vulnerable Households 7. Impacts to Community Assets 8. Loss of access to residences/place of business 9. Unidentified impacts 4.8. Entitlement Framework The Entitlement framework given below is adapted based on the present version of the RFCTLARR, 2013. In any case on a project to project basis, specific considerations based on local conditions, status of affected people etc. the entitlement framework will be customized. 44 ESMF Table 4.3: Entitlement Matrix for Compensation and R&R Impact Entitlement Framework as Explanation S. No. Category per RFCTLARR Act 1. Impacts to Title holders (Loss of Private Properties) Compensation as per Higher of (i) market valueas per India RFCTLARR Act, 2013 criteria Stamp Act,1899 for the registration provided in paragraph 26 of ofsale deed or agreements;or (ii) the Act average sale price forsimilar land ascertained from the highest 50% ofsale deeds of 1.One time grant not exceeding the preceding 3 years or (iii) Rs. 5,00,000/- for each consentedamount paid for PPPs affected household or orprivate companies. Plus100% annuity policy that shall solatium and 12% interest from date pay Rs.2000/- per month ofnotification to award.The multiplied for 20 years with factoradopted by GoMP fordistance Loss of Land appropriate indexation to from urban areato the affected area will (agricultural, Consumer Price indexation. beapplied. A homestead, commercial In case of impacts toassigned lands, or otherwise) thecompensation and otherbenefits will be provided toaffected owners at par withthe land owners.The provision of infrastructural amenities will be as per the Third Schedule of RTFCTLARR Act 2013, wherever alternative resettlement sites are provided. The provision of purchase or lease as available under RTFCTLARR act, 2013, will be exercised wherever appropriate. The acquiring entity shall consider acquisition of residual land or asset, if it is required. The Compensation for the The value of houses,buildings and otherimmovable properties willbe structure will be paid as per the provisions of the RFCTLARR determined without depreciation and as Loss of Act 2013 per the provisions of RTFCTLARR Act B residential 2013. Stamp duty and registration structure 1. Cash compensation as per the Market Value of the charges will be borne in case of structure and 100 % newhouses or sites. Houses in urban areas maybe provided in multistoried solatium. 45 ESMF Impact Entitlement Framework as Explanation S. No. Category per RFCTLARR Act 2. Each affected family building complexes having cattle will be provided one time financial assistance of Rs. 25,000 3. Provision of alternative house as per PMAY or equivalent financial assistance in Urban Areas. Provision of House in case of rural area as per IAY specifications or equivalent cost of the house. 4. Transportation cost of Rs. 50,000/- 5. Right to salvage affected materials The Compensation for the The value of commercial structures and other immovable properties will be structure will be paid as per the provisions of the RFCTLARR determined without depreciation and as Act 2013. per Section 29 of RTFCTLARR Act 2013. 1. Cash compensation as per the Market Value of the structure and 100 % Loss of solatium. C Commercial 2. One time grant to artisan, structure small trader and certain others shall get a one-time financial assistance of Rs. 25,000/- 3. Transportation cost of Rs. 50,000/- 4. Right to salvage affected materials Residential 1. Each affected family that is Impacts to displaced due to land tenants acquisition shall be given a D (residential / monthly subsistence commercial/ allowance equivalent to Rs. agricultural) 3000/- per month for a period of one year from the date of award. 46 ESMF Impact Entitlement Framework as Explanation S. No. Category per RFCTLARR Act 2. One time financial assistance of Rs. 50,000 as transportation cost for shifting of the family, building materials, belongings and cattle. 3. Right to salvage affected materials Commercial 1. One time financial assistance of Rs. 50,000 as transportation cost for shifting of the family, building materials, belongings and cattle. 2. One time grant to artisan, small trader and certain others shall get a one-time financial assistance of Rs. 25,000 Agricultural Tenants In case of agricultural tenants advance notice to harvest crops or compensation for lost crop at market value of the yield determined by agricultural department The Collector for the purpose The compensation for theaffected trees, of determining the value of plants shallbe determined as perSection trees, plants and standing crops 29 (2)& (3) of the RTFCTLARR Act Impacts to attached to the land acquired, 2013. trees, plants use the services of experienced E and standing persons in the field of crops, agriculture, forestry, horticulture, sericulture, or any other field, as may be considered necessary by him. 2. Impacts to Non-title holders (Squatters) A • Compensation at Market Houses in urban areas may, if Loss of Value for the affected necessary, be provided inmulti-storied 47 ESMF Impact Entitlement Framework as Explanation S. No. Category per RFCTLARR Act House structure OR Alternative buildingcomplexes. The Titles house with minimum area as foralternatives houses shall beprovided per Government norms in the joint nameof the wife and husband preferably, if both exist. • One time Subsistence grant of Rs. 18,000/- • One time financial assistance of Rs. 5,000/- as transportation cost for shifting of the family, building materials, belongings and cattle. • Right to salvage the affected materials; • Compensation at Market Value for the affected structure. • One time financial assistance of Rs. 5,000/- as transportation cost for B Loss of Shop shifting • One time grant of Rs. 2500/- for loss of trade/self- employment for the business owner • Right to salvage the affected materials; • Cash compensation for the The value of commercialstructures and affected structure as per the otherimmovable properties willbe Market Value determined by theMarket Value of Encroached C theencroached structurewithout Structure • One time shifting assistance depreciation of Rs. 5000/- for Kiosks • Right to salvage material. Subsistence allowance Only agricultural labourers,who are in Loss of equivalent monthly minimum fulltime /permanent employment ofthe 3. Income agricultural / industrial wages land owner or those affected full time Livelihood for 3 months employees of the business will be eligible for this assistance. For temporary disruption of Only to regular vendors or roadside 48 ESMF Impact Entitlement Framework as Explanation S. No. Category per RFCTLARR Act livelihood, minimum wages as shopkeepers whose income is affected per collector rate for the period during construction period will be of disruption (average 3 days) eligible for this assistance. Prior notice before start of construction works. Training for skill Training will be provided through development. This assistance relevant training institutions includes cost of training and financial assistance for travel/conveyance and food. One adult member of the affected household, whose The one time assistance tothe livelihood is affected, will be Vulnerable PAFs will be paid to only entitled for skill development. one type of impact for the multiple Additional assistance for vulnerable impacts. vulnerable households whose livelihood/loss of shelter is impacted by the project will be Impact to paid additional one time Vulnerable assistance of Rs. 5000 in case 4. Displaced of non-title holder families. People In addition to this amount, the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes displaced from Scheduled Areas shall receive an amount equivalent to Rs. 50000/- (as per provisions of RTFCLARR Act 2013) Further SC and ST households shall be provided with relaxation in charges in the water supply/sewerage connections SectionVImpactstoCommunityAssets Wherever possible the community assets will be relocated in consultation with community. When there location of the 49 ESMF Impact Entitlement Framework as Explanation S. No. Category per RFCTLARR Act community assets are not feasible, will be provided afresh. 4.9. Institutional Arrangements MPUDC would have the following positions to screen, appraise, approve, manage and monitor subprojects for the smooth implementation of ESMF. Table 4.4: Framework to ensure RAPs implementation Level Position Responsibilities assigned PMU Deputy Project  Handling of land transfer related matters Director  Ensuring preparation of land acquisition Plan and (Administration) / Land requisitions Acquisition/ Revenue Officer  Facilitating disbursement of compensation and R&R as per RTFCTLARR ACT prior to initiation of civil works. Social and Gender  Coordinate with DPR consultants, PIU, ULBs and Officer local stakeholders for application of the ESMF and  Review of SAP, RAP, IPDP and their implementation  Co-ordinate with the CDO of PIU and Contractor in resolving the issues that are raised during the project implementation  Review EIA and SIA of Projects at various stages of the implementation and update the same as per the prevailing conditions at that time  Review LA and RAP Reports  Conduct Project related E&S Internal Monitoring  To maintain and update ESMF on a regular basis and record changes in the Revision sheet  Review Project E&S Monitoring reports and develop internal communication reporting on Legal Compliance and Safeguard Conformance Training Coordinator  Maintaining a training calendar and co-ordinate between various stakeholders related to capacity building 50 ESMF Public Relations  Coordinate information education and communication Officer cum (IEC) activities at project and town level Community  Reporting to various stakeholders in the projects Development Officer PIU Project Manager  Overall in-charge for implementation of safeguards Deputy Project  Assist Project Manager Manager Assist Project Manager  Responsible for day to day implementation of with Civil Engineers safeguards on site Community  Verify social impacts prior to initiation of civil works. Development Officer  Ensure implementation of RAP and disbursement of entitlements with support of NGOs  Ensure consultation and participation of Scheduled Tribes, scheduled Castes, in a cultural and gender sensitive manner throughout the project cycle.  Co-ordinate between PIU, ULB and the aggrieved for time bound release of entitlements as per ESMF  Supervise NGO engaged for RAP implementation  Ensure implementation of Indigenous Peoples Framework.  Ensure that the GRC is convened regularly. PMC Environment Expert  Assist PMU and PIU in developing the reporting and Social formats and reporting framework Development Expert  Assist PIU in preparing fortnightly reports and submit the same to PMU ULB Engineer and Chief  Active participation in the implementation of the Municipal Officer safeguards, IEC, Consultations, assessment of entitlements, Grievance redressal etc. 51 ESMF 5 Indigenous Peoples Planning Framework 5.1. Demographic Status of Scheduled Tribe and its Distribution The Article 342 provides for specification of tribes or tribal communities or parts of or groups within tribes or tribal communities which are deemed to be for the Constitution the Scheduled Tribes in relation to that State or Union Territory and are valid only within the jurisdiction of that State or Union Territory and not outside. The lists of scheduled tribes are State/UT specific and a community declared as a Scheduled Tribe in a state need not be same in another state. The inclusion of a community as a Scheduled tribe is an ongoing process. The essential characteristics for a community to be identified as scheduled tribes are- 1. Indications of primitive traits 2. Distinctive culture 3. Shyness of contact with the community at large 4. Geographical isolation and 5. Backwardness The Tribal communities live in various ecological and geo-climatic conditions ranging from plains and forests to hills and inaccessible areas. Tribal groups are at different stages of social, economic and educational development. While some tribal communities have adopted a mainstream way of life, the tribes who are migrated from their traditionally occupied areas to urban areas in search of livelihood or for better education options for their children. At the other end of the spectrum there are certain other Scheduled tribes,75 in number known as Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups(PVTGs) who are characteristics by (a) pre -agricultural level of technology (b)Stagnant and declining population(c) extremely low literacy(d)subsistence level of economy. 5.1.1. Distribution of Tribes The Scheduled Tribes are notifies in 30 States/UT and the number of individual ethnic groups, etc. notified as Scheduled Tribes is 705.The tribal population of the country as per 2011 census is 10.43 cr. constituting 8.6% of the total population.89.97%of them live in rural areas and 10.03% in urban areas. The decadal population growth of the tribal's from census 2001 to 2011 has been 23.66% against the 17.69% of the entire population. The tribal population of Madhya Pradesh increased to 15,316,784 in 2011 from12, 233 and 474 in 2001. The decadal growth rate during this period is 25.20 percent. Madhya Pradesh has 14.7 percent of its populations classified as ST. The Scheduled V areas tribes of Madhya Pradesh are classified in Annexure 6. .The sex ratio for the overall population is 940 females per 1000 males and that of Scheduled tribes is 990 females per 1000 males. 52 ESMF Figure 5.1: Trends in Scheduled Tribes population (Million) Figure 5.2: Distribution of Scheduled Tribe Population by States Source: Scheduled Tribes of India ,census 2011 Figure 5.3: Scheduled Tribes (millions) by Residence from 1961-2011 Source: Scheduled Tribes of India, census 2011 53 ESMF Figure 5.2; reflect that the percentage of Scheduled Tribes in Madhya Pradesh is higher than that of other states. In Madhya Pradesh, the tribal population in urban areas is 14.5 percent(census 2011) and scattered all over the State The tribal people in urban areas do not exhibit typical characteristics such as living as a group; speak separate language from dominant population, having separate institutions in close attachment to the forest etc. Figure 5.4: Declared Schedule V areas of Madhya Pradesh Geographical Location of 19 Tribal Districts Above figure and table shows the towns coming under declared schedule V areas. Table 5.1: Declared Schedule V areas of Madhya Pradesh S. No. Declared Districts Town or district comes under MPUDP 1 Sheopur - 2 Ratlam - 3 Jhabua - 4 Dhar Dharmpuri 5 Barwani 6 Khargone Khargone, Maheshwar, Mandleshwar 7 Khandwa - 8 Burhanpur - 9 Hoshangabad - 10 Betul - 11 Chhindwara - 54 ESMF S. No. Declared Districts Town or district comes under MPUDP 12 Seoni - 13 Balaghat - 14 Mandla - 15 Dindori Dindori 16 Anuppur - 17 Shahdol - 18 Sidhi - 19 Umaria - 5.1.1. Regulatory Provisions for Indigenous People The regulatory provisions for indigenous people are noted below. Notification 1) Article (preamble) 342- Declaration for Indigenous People 2) Article 366- Define Indigenous People For Education, Economics and Public employment- related safeguards 3) Article15-Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, sex, caste or place of birth. 4) Article16- Equality of opportunity in matter of public employment. 5) Article 19-Protection of certain rights regarding freedom of speech etc. 6) Article 46-Protection of Education and Economic interest of Scheduled castes, Indigenous people and other weaker sections. 7) Article 335-Claims of Scheduled Castes and Indigenous People to services and posts Political safeguards 8) Article 330- Reservation of seats for Scheduled castes and Indigenous People in the House of the people 9) Article 332-Reservation of seats for Scheduled castes and Indigenous People in the Legislative Assemblies of the states. 10) Article 334-Reservation of seats and special representation to cease after sixty years. 11) Article 243D- Reservation of seats (in Panchayats) 12) Article 243T-Reservation of seats Agency for monitoring safeguards 13) Article 338A- national commission for Indigenous people. Fundamental rights (Provisions support to subprojects Indigenous People) 14) Article 23- Prohibition of traffic in human beings and forced labour 15) Article 24- Prohibition of employment of children in Labour work, factories etc. 16) Article 38-State to secure a social order for the promotion of welfare of the people. 17) Article 39A-Equal justice and free legal aid The above provisions will be helpful in project areas to protect the fundamental rights and safeguard the Indigenous People. 55 ESMF In addition to the above, OP/BP-4.10 of World Bank policy contributes to the Bank's mission of poverty reduction and sustainable development by ensuring that the development process fully respects the dignity ,human rights, economies and cultures of Indigenous Peoples. 5.2. Indigenous Peoples Management Framework (IPMF) MPUDP will be implemented in urban areas where Scheduled tribes constitute more than11% of the total population of scheduled tribes of state. Hence, as part of ESMF, an Indigenous Peoples Management Framework (IPMF) has been prepared. The IPMFaims at effectively promoting IP participationthroughout the project cycle. The general objective of the IPMF is theinclusion of the IP communities in the project in order to achieve the highestpossible positive impact of the interventions to improve their quality of life,through strengthening of their organization, self- management, and integralcapacity of their members. The specific objectives of the IPMF are to ensurethat: (a) works are culturally appropriate, (b) works and services provided donot inadvertently induce inequality by limiting project benefits to the eliteelements of the community, (c) the project conducts Free Prior and Informed Consultation with communities througha consultation process appropriate to the local cultural context and localdecision-making processes; and (d) establish appropriate information-,communication-, and diversity-training strategies with the different IPs andcommunities in all stages of the project. Steps involved are listed below: 1. Screening through secondary data or survey to identify whether Indigenous People are present in or have collective attachment to the project area. Specifically, the project would first ascertain whether the affected persons meet the following four characteristics of Indigenous Peoples as specified in WB OP 4.10 a) self-identification as members of a distinct indigenous cultural group and recognition of this identity by others; b) collective attachment to geographically distinct habitats or ancestral territories in the project area and to the natural resources in these habitats and territories c) customary cultural, economic, social, or political institutions that are separate from those of the dominant society and culture; and d) an indigenous language, often different from the official language of the country or region If the assessment indicates presence of such groups in the project area then a subproject specific IPP would be prepared then next steps would involve the following 2. Undertake social assessment in project areas as per parameters suggested in bank policy 3. A process of free, prior and informed consultation with the affected Indigenous Peoples' communities at each stage of the project and particularly during project preparation to fully identify their views and ascertain their broad community support for the project. 4. Preparation of an Indigenous People Plan(IPP) 5. Disclosure of draft Indigenous People Plan 56 ESMF 5.3. Impact on Indigenous people in subproject areas About all the potential subprojects are likely to have presence of scheduled tribes. The IPPs for respective sup projects shall ensure that they have equal access to the benefits of the project and interests of Scheduled Tribes and other disadvantaged groups are protected. The project shall ensure that IPs participate in the consultation process throughout the project cycle and get access to infrastructure created under the project. SC and ST households shall also be encouraged to get water supply/sewerage connections through relaxation in charges. In case of any adverse impacts of schedule Tribes they shall be compensated and assisted through the respective RAPs. The ESA for three subprojects carried out so far reveal that the tribal people in urban areas do not exhibit any of the above mentioned characteristics such as living as a group. 5.4. Indigenous People Plan (or Tribal Development Plan) The IPP (or Tribal Development Plan) shall contain the following 1. Project Description - MPUDP and proposed subproject 2. Objectives of IPP/TDP 3. Methodology for preparation of IPP (include results from the Screening exercise) 4. Minimization of impacts 5. Free and prior informed consultations (FPIC) for Broad community support 6. Social Assessment a. Household survey findings b. Impact details - positive impacts and adverse impacts on assets, community resources, livelihood etc. 7. Action Plan a. mitigation measures (as outlined in the IPMF) b. FPICs to be undertaken during implementation c. implementation schedule (by activities and months) i. FPIC ii. Provision of mitigation measures iii. monitoring of implementation d. monitoring indicators (as necessary by subproject) e. implementation budget including cost of i. Mitigation measures ii. Conducting FPICs - material, logistics iii. Miscellaneous contingency f. grievance mechanisms (by level of mechanism) 5.5. Gender Assessment and Development Framework Mainstreaming gender equity and empowerment is already a focus area in theproject. In the subprojects, activities related to livelihood restoration willaddress women’s needs. A Gender Development Framework has beendesigned under the project as part of ESMF which will help analyze genderissues during the preparation stage of subproject and design interventions. Atthe subproject level, gender analysis will be part of the social assessmentand the analysis will be based on findings from gender specific queries duringprimary data collection process and 57 ESMF available secondary data. Thequantitative and qualitative analysis will bring out sex disaggregated data andissues related to gender disparity, needs, constraints, and priorities; as well asunderstanding whether there is a potential for gender based inequitable risks,benefits and opportunities. Based on the specific interventions will bedesigned and if required gender action plan will be prepared. The overallmonitoring framework of the project will include sex disaggregated indicatorand gender relevant indicator. 5.6. Beneficiary Assessment A baseline beneficiary assessment will be carried out for all the subprojects whereverappropriate, through relevant instruments including sample household surveys, FGDs,secondary information through Census, NSSO data etc. to collect relevant baselineinformation related to the subprojects. Beneficiary assessment will cover low income areas,perceptions among women, etc. This activity will be completed during the first year of thecontract award and will be used to measure the improvements against the baselinesituations after the subprojects are completed and put into use. 58 ESMF 6 Stakeholder Consultation and Information Disclosure The Consultation process envisages involvement of all the stakeholders’ at each stage of project planning and implementation. The development of the ESMF is based on a consultative process that sought feedback from key stakeholders. Involvement of the community is not limited to interactions with the community but also disclosing relevant information pertaining to the project tasks. The project has a separate consultation and communication strategy, which also covers consultation related to social and environmental issues. This chapter reiterates elements of the strategy that is relevant to social and environmental issues in general and the ESMF in particular. This chapter also outlines the disclosure of documents done and planned under the project. It should be noted that consultations on social and environmental issues to be carried out during implementation of subprojects need to be done in an inclusive manner, including vulnerable social groups (such as women, poor household, caste, persons with disabilities, among others). 6.1. Subproject Consultations for preparing ESMF As a part of the preparation, a social and environmental assessment was done. This focused on the 25 ULBs that are proposed for investments of which 8 ULBs are at different stages of DPR preparation/Finalization. In each of these ULBs, public / stakeholder consultations were organized. The information gathered during these consultations was incorporated in the social and environmental assessment, and in the ESMF as appropriate. The summary of consultations during preparation of draft ESMF and ESAs at ULB levels given in appendix 5. Consultation being a continuous process. The ESMF and it’sspecific instruments provide guidelines and procedures for furtherconsultations during project implementation, in particular in defining anddesigning subprojects and specific works. The consultation frameworkprovide systematic guidance to address potential risks and to enhance quality,targeting, and benefits to the population. Dialogue and disclosure actionsduring the assessment and execution process of a subproject are designed toensure that those stakeholders involved, whether they benefit from or areaffected by the impacts of works, are well informed and participate in thedecision-making process. The ESMF procedures consider the level ofenvironmental and social risk of each work to allocate time and effort toconsultation. 6.2. Mechanism for Consultation The Consultation Framework envisages involvement of all the stakeholders’ at each stage of project planning and implementation. Involvement of the community is not limited to interactions with the community but also disclosing relevant information pertaining to the project tasks. Community participation shall be ensured at the following stages: 6.2.1. Subproject identification stage To sensitize the community about the subproject and their role 59 ESMF 6.2.2. Planning/Design Stage For disseminating information pertaining to the subproject, work schedule and the procedures involved; finalization of project components with identification of impacts, entitled persons, mitigation measures; and Grievance Redressal mechanisms to be adopted. Dissemination of project information to the community and relevant stakeholders is to be carried out by MPUDC/PMU/PIU at this stage of the project initiative. The community at large shall be made aware of the project alternatives and necessary feedback is to be obtained,other stakeholders should be involved in the decision making to the extent possible. The outcome of consultations will be incorporated as appropriate in the designs and mitigation plans. As part of such consultations, the draft Mitigation Plans will also be presented and explained to the people on the content and process of the implementation of the plans. Consultations with Project Affected Persons and their profiling are mandatory as per the requirements of SIA and preparation of RAP. This needs to be done as socio-economic and census surveys as part of the ESA study. Consultations with respect to cultural aspects are to be carried out as part of the Social Impact Assessments for all alternatives and the selected alternative subproject option. For Ea/Sa projects at least two consultations shall be conducted, one at screening stage and the second at the draft final EIA / EMP/ RAP stage. Public consultation requirements and process, reporting etc. is provided in the Volume II. In all subprojects involving resettlement, and prior to the preparation of Resettlement Action Plans, the PAPs will be informed of the project objectives, likely impacts and essential provisions of Resettlement Policy through the following activities:  Awareness campaigns using local Cable TV channel, print media such as posters or information leaflets;  Holding public information meetings in various project site locations and affected areas;  Arranging interactive sessions with the PAPs & their representative stakeholders groups;  Formation of focus groups involving key stakeholders, like local leaders, women, etc.; these could also serve as local community monitoring groups In order to discuss and seek opinion / suggestion from the PAPs / their representative shall be formally invited to participate in various meetings regarding resettlement issue as convened by the ULB/Executing agency. As part of such consultations, draft RAPs will be presented and explained for the context and process and eligible entitlements of the people. 6.2.3. Implementation Stage Consultations as part of the implementation stage would be direct interactions of the implementation agency with the Project Affected Persons. These would comprise of consultations towards relocation of the PAPs, relocation of cultural properties, and towards addressing the impacts on common property resources (CPRs) such as places of religious importance, community buildings, trees, etc. With the implementation of the R&R provisions in progress, consultations and information dissemination is to be undertaken to let the affected persons informed of the progress. Implementation stage also involves redressal of grievances in case of R&R aspects as well as relocation of common property resources through the grievance 60 ESMF redress mechanisms. These would usually be one to one meeting of PAP or community representatives with the grievance redress committee established for the project. All consultations on social and environmental issues carried out during implementation of subprojects should be done in an inclusive manner, including vulnerable social groups (such as women, poor household, caste, persons with disabilities, among others). 6.3. Stakeholder Mapping Through the formal and informal consultation, following stakeholder mapping has been done, identifying their interests concerned with the project activities. StakeStakeholder categoryder InterInterest Potential/Probable Category impacts Primary stakeholders Project affected people (including Access to the facility, Project (+/-) vulnerable groups) entitlement, Time-bound delivery of benefits, enhanced quality of life Beneficiaries Access to the facility, Project (+/-) entitlement, Time-bound delivery of benefits, enhanced quality of life Secondary stakeholders Urban Local Bodies, Revenue Project implementation, (+/-) department, Water resource Contracting; Project department, ASI, Forest management, Monitoring and department, evaluation NGOs, CSOs, Research institutes Development, Community (+/-) participation, and Community welfare This is a tentative mapping which may change during the project implementation. Each of these stakeholders will be part of the consultation process and their views will be incorporated in to the project design. 6.4. Information Disclosure The following documents will be disclosed on the website of MPUDC, ULBs under MPUDP:  ESMF (full report will be included in Hindi language for better understanding of the process);  The approved ESA reports of projects in English;  A non-technical summary in Hindi;  EMP/RAP/ARAP documents;  Annual E&S Audits; and 61 ESMF  Resettlement Impact Evaluation Report. In addition, all above documents for each subproject will be submitted to The World Bank for clearance and disclosure. 62 ESMF 7 Grievance Redressal Mechanism In order to redress the grievance raised by any affected person during project construction / implementation, project level Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) through a government order shall be established as a grievance redress mechanism for the project. In addition to the project level GRC, redress of grievances relating to Land Acquisition will be as per the RTFCTLARR Act, 2013. 7.1. Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) The Project level GRC shall be constituted with five persons including a female member.  One from the ULB / Executing Agency  Any One Elected Representative (Local Project Area)--( preferably female)  A person who is publicly known and accepted by the locals (in the project area) to speak on their behalf (to be identified by the Elected Representatives of the ULB)  Community Development officer from PIU  ULB level community organizer or Chief Municipal Officer's representative 7.2. Grievance Redress Mechanism Affected person(s) shall file its grievance with the respective ULB, PIU or Contractor. The affected may register his or her grievance personally or on phone disclosing his or her identity and address. The affected will have to clarify the area of grievance. The grievances related to construction activities affecting the livelihood or loss of property/utility or restriction of access and the grievances regarding the quality of service during operation and maintenance period will only be entertained by the GRC. Grievances related to corruption will only be dealt under the laws of the land. The grievance shall be addressed within 48 hours. However, if there is any technical issue, the aggrieved will be informed accordingly. The Design Engineer in-charge from PIU for the project shall be the nodal officer for the grievance redressal. The meeting of the committee shall be convened as and when necessary and at such place or places as it considers appropriate; and conduct the proceedings in an informal manner as he / she considers appropriate with the object to bring an amicable settlement between the aggrieved parties. A structured approach will be followed for redressing grievances. The grievance will be addressed to the Project Manager of the concerned PIU but it will be the duty of the engineer of the PIU on site and /or the Public Relations Officer at PIU to take orders from the Project Manager and take immediate curative action. In case the grievance is not addressed within 48 hours, the grievance shall be sent to GRC. The aggrieved project affected person / family may formally approach the GRC in the first stage and submits their appeal along with any supporting documents / information. The grievance 63 ESMF committee shall accordingly convene a meeting (either based on a case to case basis or a clustered approach, but without unreasonable delay). The committee shall look into the grievances and information provided and based on this, propose ways to resolve the issues. Based on the final decision, the proceedings of the GRC will be documented and executed by the ULB / Executing agency through contractor. If still not satisfied with the resolution provided by the GRC, the complainants can then appeal to the grievance redress mechanisms available on CM helpline; there are two ways to access the CM helpline (a) The complaint will be directly registered through toll free no. “181” (b) The complaint will be registered online by filling a prescribed format on cmhelpline.mp.gov.in/schemes.html The MPUDC shall be linked with the CM helpline. 64 ESMF 8 Institutional Framework 8.1. Introduction UDHD (the Executing Agency) through MPUDC (the Implementing Agency) is the financing agency of MPUDP. MPUDC has envisaged and established an institutional model that would be used for all the projects funded by it in future. The proposed model has been built on the following overarching principles:  Empowerment: Strengthening: Government of Madhya Pradesh has already delegated all the implementation functions and related powers and responsibilities provided in 74th Constitutional amendment, to the ULBs.  City Development Plans: UDHD has already prepared City Development Plans (CDPs) for all the Urban Local Bodies in Madhya Pradesh. These CDPs have been prepared by employing qualified consultancy firms after rigorous town visits and many rounds of consultations with various Stakeholders as well as the general public at large. The CDPs have been made available online at the website E-mpcdp.com.  Support and Technical Assistance: Make ULB an essential part of the implementation by routing the implementation of reforms and community participation (especially in case of Sewerage sub component) through them.  Private sector Capacity: Make use of local expertise by outsourcing the capacity requirement at ULBs level.  Focused Role: More focused role for MPUDC as financing and executing along with monitoring agency. This would enable the MPUDC to increase its financing activities to more ULBs and for a variety of activities.  Capacity Building: Build capacity at various levels. Build monitoring capacity at MPUDC. Build implementation capacity at ULB level. Build ULB capacity through panel of advisors. The roles and responsibilities of various organizations involved in MPUDP are detailed elsewhere, viz. the Project Implementation Plan and Project Operations Manual. However the roles and responsibilities that are related to social and environmental aspects are listed below: Table 8.1: Overall Organizational Roles Level Organization Role State UDHD Monitor and evaluate the works and execution of ESMF State MPUDC (PMU) Review and approval of subprojects and ESA and EMP and SMP, RAP, for each subproject. Review and Monitor the implementation of EMP and SMP Monitoring of all Community Awareness and Participation activities 65 ESMF Level Organization Role Organize Capacity Building Programs Empowered Periodic Review of implementation of the project Committees including safeguards State MPPCB Approvals for STP and WTP before start of Operation and Maintenance Periodic Monitoring of the effluent quality and ensure that it is according to the Standards laid down by CPCB/ CPHEEO Act as a regulatory body Regional MPUDC (PIU) Implementation of Environment Management Plan and through Contractor Town Implementation of SMP and RAP as applicable. Obtaining various clearances and approvals required and essential for project implementation Ensure the applicability of EMP during the project implementation Verify the SMP, RAP prepared during DPR phase. Verify the ESA, RAP required jointly verify the temporary impacts along with D(R)BO contractor and update the ESA and ESMP and Implementation, supervision and progress monitoring of all Community Awareness and Participation activities State and Project Assist PIU in the implementation and supervision of Town Management Environment and Social Safeguards Consultants Informing the PIU and PMU, if the contractor is not following the policies stated in Chapter 3. Assist PIU in evaluating R&R cases, if any, and assess the loss incurred Assist PIU in making a structured programme with respect to the implementation of the safeguards State Panel of Will help MPUDC in detailed ESAs and preparation of Consultants EMP, SMPs, RAPs etc. District District Collector Transfer of Government Lands, Grievance Redress, if Level (Revenue) any. City level Council Overall monitoring of ESMF execution In case of any grievance, bring it to the notice of appropriate authority through Mayor/Chairman / 66 ESMF Level Organization Role Commissioner/ Chief Municipal Officer ULB Support in Implementation of safeguards Assistance in obtaining necessary government approvals and orders for implementation of project Implementation, supervision and progress monitoring of reforms consolidation activities Implementation, supervision and progress monitoring of town planning activities Take part in the Implementation of all Community Awareness and Participation activities Maintain account with provisional sums for R&R activities ULB shall carry out the social outreach and necessary Information, Education and Communication (IEC) activities to ensure adequate social acceptability through citizen participation, community engagement and will set up a mechanism for consumer grievance redress and attend to consumer complaints in a timely manner. It shall also obtain timely feedback of citizens on the services provided and keep updated MPUDC from time to time and take due care of needs of the urban poor and minorities. 8.2. Description of MPUDC In order to increase the pace of urban infrastructure development and service delivery improvements, streamlining of project implementations and other intermediate processes is a key. Hence the Government of Madhya Pradesh (GoMP) decided to establish a nodal corporate institutional framework at the State level for providing project development, financing and implementation support to the ULBs and other city level implementing agencies. In this context, the Government decided to set up a Government owned limited company named, Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company Limited (MPUDC), in April 2015, which is mandated to implement infrastructure projects in urban sector including Externally Aided Projects, professionally manage the funds received from various sources, as well as MPUIF and other urban infrastructure funds. The Government intended to bring in private sector skills to enhance the efficiency of this company. In addition to being the fund manager, MPUDC as the “nodal urban infrastructure development and financing intermediary” is also envisaged to provide the technical and financial assistance to the Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) in Madhya Pradesh towards project development, financing and implementation for priority urban infrastructure and municipal service delivery projects as well as for implementing the reform initiatives relevant for sustainability of investments and services 67 ESMF in urban areas in Madhya Pradesh. MPUDC will also be the nodal agency in MP for implementation of Externally Aided Urban Investment Projects (funded by international development partners and donor agencies). MPUDC is a fully-owned Government company, intended to perform financial services for urban infrastructure projects including implementation of projects. MPUDC is mandated to arrange and manage funds as also to implement the urban infrastructure projects funded by the Central Government, State Government or funded through loans or grants from multilateral funding agencies.  The main functions of MPUDC include Conformance with Environment & Social (E&S) Safeguards and Legal Compliance, as given below:  Implementation, Monitoring and Upkeep of Environment & Social framework approved by the funding agencies and GoMP  Facilitation in seeking E&S legal compliance for projects  Review & Monitoring of Environment and Social Management Plans (including Resettlement and Rehabilitation Action Plans) and Assistance in implementing corrective actions (mitigation measures)  Capacity Building and Awareness raising of ULB and Project staff on E&S aspects  MPUDC, through its PIUs, will be implementing the subprojects of MPUDP.  PIU will play an active role in Effective implementation of safeguards established under ESMF through:  Plan and execute social and environmental management plans through contractors and monitoring them through supervision consultants  Identify project-wise RAP and EIA requirements and build in-house capacity to address RAP and EIA/EMP requirements  Prepare O&M plans and ensure the practices are institutionalized 8.3. Framework to ensure ESMF implementation and Staff for MPUDP: MPUDC would have the following positions to screen, appraise, approve, manage and monitor subprojects under MPUDP: Table 8.2: Framework to Ensure ESMF Implementation Level Position Responsibilities assigned PMU Managing Director  Quarterly review of Safeguard Implementation Engineer-in-Chief  Review of Bid Documents and ensure inclusion of E&S safeguards and fiduciary provisions for various mitigations  Periodic review of Safeguard Implementation (monthly) Director (Technical)  Review and approval of EAs and SIAs, EMP, SMP, RAP, IPDP 68 ESMF Level Position Responsibilities assigned  Reporting of Safeguard Implementation to World Bank  Conduct project related E&S internal monitoring (fortnightly).  Facilitate independent audit by external agency.  Review terms of reference (ToR) for EIA and SIA of Projects, as prepared by consultants Deputy Project Director  Ensure that all subprojects are following requirements (Technical ) from E&S requirements and legal compliance, as applicable to the project portfolio  Review ToRs for DPR preparation  Assist Engineer-in-Chief and Director (Technical) Procurement Officer  Ensure inclusion of E&S safeguards and fiduciary provisions for various mitigations in Bid Documents  Ensure contractor's responsibilities towards safeguards are clearly defined  Ensure that the roles and responsibilities of various stakeholders in the implementation of safeguard framework is clearly defined and there is no ambiguity or overlapping. Environment Engineer  Dedicated for MPUDP and will coordinate with PIUs, PMC, Contractor's , ULBs and local stakeholders for application of the ESMF and EMPs  Review ESA of Projects at various stages of the implementation and update the same as per the prevailing conditions at that time  Conduct Project related E&S Internal monitoring including visits to the subproject sites at least once in a quarter  To maintain and update ESMF on a regular basis and record changes in the Revision sheet  Review Project E&S Monitoring reports and develop internal communication reporting on Legal Compliance and Safeguard Conformance Technical Officer  Ensure incorporation of ESMF requirements as part of assisted by Civil DPR preparation such as stakeholder consultations, Engineers analysis of alternatives, mitigation measures etc.. Deputy Project  Handling of land transfer related matters Director  Ensuring preparation of land acquisition Plan and (Administration) / Land requisitions Acquisition/ Revenue  Facilitating disbursement of compensation and R&R Officer as per RTFCTLARR ACT prior to initiation of civil works. Social and Gender  Dedicated for MPUDP and will coordinate with DPR 69 ESMF Level Position Responsibilities assigned Officer consultants, PIU, ULBs and local stakeholders for application of the ESMF  Review of SAP, RAP, IPDP and their implementation  Co-ordinate with the CDO of PIU and Contractor in resolving the issues that are raised during the project implementation  Review ESA of Projects at various stages of the implementation and update the same as per the prevailing conditions at that time  Review LA and RAP Reports  Conduct Project related E&S Internal Monitoring including visits to the subproject sites at least once in a quarter  To maintain and update ESMF on a regular basis and record changes in the Revision sheet  Review Project E&S Monitoring reports and develop internal communication reporting on Legal Compliance and Safeguard Conformance Training Coordinator  Maintaining a training calendar and co-ordinate between various stakeholders related to capacity building Public Relations  Co-ordinate IEC at project and Town level Officer cum  Reporting to various stakeholders in the projects Community Development Officer PIU Project Manager  Overall in-charge for implementation of safeguards Deputy Project  Assist Project Manager Manager Assist Project Manager  At least one designated engineer to be responsible for with Civil Engineers day to day monitoring agreed safeguard actions in the subproject Community  Verify social impacts prior to initiation of civil works. Development Officer  Ensure implementation of RAP and disbursement of entitlements with support of NGOs  Ensure consultation and participation of Scheduled Tribes, scheduled Castes, in a cultural and gender sensitive manner throughout the project cycle.  Co-ordinate between PIU, ULB and the aggrieved for time bound release of entitlements as per ESMF  Supervise NGO engaged for RAP implementation  Ensure implementation of Indigenous Peoples Framework.  Ensure that the GRC is convened regularly. PMC Environment Expert  Assist PMU and PIU in monitoring agreed 70 ESMF Level Position Responsibilities assigned and environmental safeguard actions, follow up with the respective subproject contractors, develop reporting formats, reporting framework.  Assist PIU in preparing fortnightly reports and submit the same to PMU  Visit the subproject sites at least once a month Social Development  Assist PMU and PIU in monitoring agreed social Expert safeguard actions, develop reporting formats, reporting framework.  Assist PIU in preparing fortnightly reports and submit the same to PMU  Visit the subproject sites at least once a month ULB Engineer and Chief  Active participation in the implementation of the Municipal Officer safeguards, IEC, Consultations, assessment of entitlements, Grievance redressal etc. A separate PMU for MPUDP will be provided at State Level whereas at PIU level, a civil engineer, as the representative of the Project Manager, will be exclusively appointed for each subproject of MPUDP. 8.4. Reporting Framework Contractor will report the implementation of ESMP to PIU daily or as per their activity plan. PMC will report to PMU/ PIU minimum once a week or as per their schedule. PIU will report the implementation of safeguard frameworks, review results and suggest modifications on fortnightly basis to the PMU. Engineer-in-Chief and Director (Tech) will take a joint review of this report on monthly basis. Managing Director will review the safeguard implementation on quarterly basis. Director (Technical) will be responsible to inform the World Bank about the ESMF implementation and submit the Progress quarterly. 71 ESMF 9 Monitoring, Review and Evaluation 9.1. Overview During project construction, periodic monitoring will be conducted by PIU, MPUDC through consultants, based on the EMP / RAP documents prepared earlier and the covenants included in the contractor agency. Depending on the complexity of the project and its E&S category, the assessments / monitoring will be based on either a desk review (Category Ec and Sc) or a periodic site visit (Category Ea, Eb and Sa, Sb). MPUDC will undertake quarterly field visits to those projects that are under implementation and the report findings will be shared with respective implementing agencies for their follow-up. The non-compliance and their corrective measures will be highlighted in these reports which will be communicated and followed-up on a periodic basis. The monitoring will be carried out to achieve the following objectives:  Ensure that E&S mitigation measures are implemented effectively to avoid / minimize adverse impacts in line with the ESMP and ESMF  Compliance of the project with all E&S statutory requirements, as applicable  Conformance with Lenders E&S safeguards  Maintenance of adequate documentation and records as evidence of conformance MPUDC will monitor all projects (during planning, construction and operation and maintenance stages) that it finances to ensure conformity to above requirements. Monitoring of Environmental and Social components will be carried out through environmental and social compliance reports that form part of quarterly Progress Reports. Based on verification of progress reports and field visits, these compliance reports and compliance to other loan disbursement conditions, subsequent installments will be disbursed by MPUDC. At PIU level, Project Manager remains responsible for monitoring the project activities and implementation of EMP/SMP. At ULB level one officer dedicated or made in-charge to monitor the EMP/SMP implementation and submit regular progress reports including environmental and social compliance reports to MPUDC. In order to ensure that the affected people receive the compensation and assistance prior to taking over of land, coordination between various procurement and works related activities are to be reflected in the RAP. Actions to be completed before issue of bids include: (i) Final approval and disclosure of RAP, wherever is applicable, (ii) the first notification for private land acquisition if involved; (iii) issue of identity cards to eligible project affected families. During contract implementation, the payment of land acquisition compensation and R&R assistance along with replacement of affected community assets should have been completed and this will be certified by ULBs with necessary details from District Administration and ULBs will certify sites free of encumbrances with all approvals and clearances secured prior to handing over of the each of the sites to the contractors. 72 ESMF 9.2. Review/Approval process During the Project Appraisal, Environmental and Social aspects will be reviewed and verified against the standards set in the ESMF for the type of environmental and social issues:  Adequacy of environmental and social assessment and management measures provided,  Scope for enhancement opportunities  Compliance with regulatory requirements and clearances  Integration of environmental measures in to the design where ever relevant  Arrangements for implementation of EMP, including institutional capacity and contractual provisions  Inclusion of management measures with provisions in the project cost  Inclusion of EMP provisions in the bid document  Need for any legal covenant to address any specific environmental risks including regulatory risks (this could be an input to the sanction letter)  Review of EIA/SIA and mitigation plans (EMP/RAPs) and their adequacy to response to ESMF provisions and magnitude and nature of impacts.  Disclosure of project information and Public consensus on the project and locations/ sites involved.  Readiness of the sites required for the project. A detailed E&S appraisal note will be prepared as part of the project appraisal. The appraisal note will include brief description of potential impact/risks and adequacy of mitigation / management plans and recommend the covenants / conditions to be imposed for monitoring and linking with the disbursement. The budget estimates and its sources will be reflected in EMPs and RAPs and included in the cost of the project. Therefore, while appraising the project financially, necessary grant for viability as well as for meeting the cost of RAP would be considered by MPUDC within the framework for appraisal criteria. The compensation and R&R assistance will be paid prior to taking over of land and affected assets. In case if the land owner refuses to accept the compensation or is not available for taking over of the compensation or R&R assistance is not paid for any other reasons, the assessed compensation and assistance amounts will be transferred to interest bearing escrow account before taking over of the land and assets. This is to ensure that money is available as soon as the land owners come forward to receive compensation. No income tax will be deducted for the compensation or R&R assistance paid in cash. Sample of review format is annexed in volume II. 9.3. Evaluation /Audit of ESMF MPUDC will ensure that Safeguard mitigation plans undergo annual external audit that would be carried out by independent agency and recommendations of the audit will be implemented in the 73 ESMF respective subprojects and in MPUDP, as applicable. The audit will focus on the process followed for categorization and approval of E & S reports, disclosures and related aspects. The audit will also be based on field visits to all E &S, Ea,Eb and Sa, Sb category projects to verify their implementation on the ground and solicit feedback from the affected people and other stakeholders. The audit will be carried out on an annual basis as a minimum for the activities completed until previous financial year, with six monthly reviews for environmentally and socially sensitive projects. The draft report shall be forwarded to the World Bank and upon approval the final audit report will be disclosed. The interventions recommended in the audit findings would form the basis of appropriate revision of Safeguard mitigation plans or suitable analytical studies to influence policy or programs in the State of MP. Review would be undertaken through examination of key documents of (see an indicative list below) as provided by MPUDC:  Safeguard mitigation plans -structure, details and Formats  Screening Process (Screening of Projects), PIU wise project screening reports  EIA / SIA / RAP/APAPs  Select Projects across 13 PIUs and check documents / records to establish objective evidence of effective application of mitigation measures and operational controls in the projects where the ESMF has been adopted. This will be based on interviews with staff from MPUDC, ULBs, Implementing agencies, Contractors, O&M agencies etc.  The annual external audit process will be conducted by the independent agency.  Conduct sample project site visits (one day visit for one project site for each of the PIUs). The objective of these visits is to review on ground Safeguard mitigation plan implementation on the site limited to the actions / controls identified in the ESMF documents / records and applicable to the particular project. Based on the above review and audit, a report will be prepared with recommendations on the following aspects:  How and to what extent does the ESMF address Safeguard mitigation plans concerns relevant to the Projects undertaken?  How relevant and comprehensive are the key elements of ESMF and how are they aligned to Safeguard mitigation plans of the DFIs and National / State level Regulation  Are the institutional arrangements effective and adequate in implementing ESMF and Safeguard mitigation plans at various levels? 74 ESMF 10 Capacity Building and Training 10.1. Background MPUDP envisages capacity building for its stakeholders in the project implementation who will include Urban Local Bodies, Statutory Boards, Public Undertakings and Potential Private Operators in order to ensure that the ESMF is effectively operationalized. This will be accomplished by organizing sensitization programs, workshops, training programs, etc., which will be coordinated and anchored through training institutions in Madhya Pradesh (such as EPCO, NITTTR etc. ) and other local and National Institutions and individuals experienced in various aspects of urban infrastructure projects through proposal. The expertise of the World Bank also will be availed for capacity building exercise. The training programs on ESMF will be conducted as part of orientation programs on the various aspects of urban infrastructure like Municipal Finance, Urban Planning, Project Management and Engineering and Public Health,. Course for ESMF training will include EA, SA, new land acquisition and R&R act, preparation and implementation of EMP and RAPs, consultations and public hearing, regulatory requirements, ESMF adoption and compliance, sustainable urban development, energy efficiency, climate change mitigation & adaptation, etc. Details of training program are provided in Table 10.1. MPUDC will make a conscious effort to mainstream the environmental and social topics with the main training program of projects. The program will be structured in such a way that it clearly brings out the value addition and enhancement benefits of proper management of environmental and social issues. MPUDC also proposes enhancing capacity of its own staff and Project officers in environmental and social safeguards, technical aspects of the proposed projects, through orientation programs, trainings, exposure visits to similar projects implemented, courses and participation in both national and international training courses and seminars/workshops, etc. The proposed capacity building activities will be supported through Urban Sector TA Component. 75 ESMF Table 10.1 : Training Program Program Duration/ Participants Schedule Program 1: Orientation Program / Workshop for Project Development agency/ Project Implementing agency Module 1 – ESMF Profile Module 2 - Module 3 - Social 1½ days  Officials of the ULBs  MPUDP Concept Environmental Impact (1st, 3rd and IAs involved in the  ESMF Concept Impact Assessment Assessment and 5th implementation of  Regulatory Requirements- Process Process year of the EMPs. E&S Priority Issues  Environmental R&R policies and project)  Officials of Statutory  Project Cycle of MPUDP Laws &Regulations procedures Boards, Public  EA/SA Process Outline  EA process National & World Undertakings and other  Reports & Formats  Identification of Bank’s regulatory monitoring agencies Environmental requirements  Field and supervising Impacts LA process officials of the private  Impact Identification of operators / contracting Identification PAPs firms / consultants. Methods Entitlement  Identification of Frameworks Mitigation Social Impact Measures Assessment  Formulation of RAP Techniques Environmental Beneficiary Management Plan Assessments  Climate Change adaptation and Mitigation Plans  Implementation and Monitoring  Institutional Mechanism 76 ESMF Program -2 Workshop on Sectorial Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Module I - ESMF Module II - Generic Modules applicable to Module III – 1½ days  Officials of the ULBs Concept be developed for Water Supply and Sewerage Open (every and IAs involved in the  MPUDC Concept schemes Forum alternate implementation of  ESMF Concept  Regulatory Requirements-E&S Feedback and years) EMPs.  Regulatory Priority Issues comments from (Introduction  Officials of Statutory Requirements-  EA/SIA Process Outline the n will be Boards, Public E&S Priority  Identification of Environmental Participants. common to Undertakings and other Issues Impacts all and monitoring agencies  Project Cycle of  Identification of Mitigation Measures participants  Field and supervising MPUDC  Formulation of Environmental will be split officials of the private  EA/SA Process Management Plan according operators / contracting Outline Reports  Climate Change adaptation and to their firms / consultants. & Formats mitigation respective sectors)  Implementation and Monitoring  Social Entitlement Frameworks  Social Impact Assessment  RAP Techniques  Case Studies Program -3 Experience Sharing Module – Experiences and Best Practices 2 Days  Officials of the ULBs and Experiences on implementation of ESMF in implemented projects. (3rd and IAs involved in the Best Practices 5th year of implementation of EMPs. Site visits to project towns/sites. the project)  Officials of Statutory Boards, Public Undertakings and other monitoring agencies  Field and supervising officials of the private operators / contracting firms / consultants. 77 ESMF 11 Budgetary Requirements 11.1. General For establishing and maintaining the ESMF, budgetary provisions for various activities will be required. These activities include: manpower, capacity-building & training, services of advisers/consultants/ experts for specific tasks and any special studies that need to be done to influence the municipal reform process. This is going to cost to MPUDC. Resettlement & rehabilitation if any and implementation of environmental mitigation measures will also cost. The costs for measurable quantities in EMP shall be added into the capital costs of respective subprojects. However, costs of un-measurable items and Resettlement and rehabilitation if any, will be reflected in the BoQ as provisional sum to be kept with the respective ULB or PIU of MPUDC, as the case may be and implementation of environmental mitigation measures will be included in the capital cost of respective subproject. Table 11.1: Proposed budget Activity Level of participants Proposed budget Training and Elected representatives 5 for Project level INR 500,000 per Orientation and workshop MPUDC staff Program 2 for ULBs INR 500000 x 7 = ULB officials INR 3.5 million Project beneficiaries Environmental and Annual audit of each Subproject level INR 2.5.million per Social Audit subprojects year INR 2.5 x 5 =INR 12.5 million Exposure visits/ State level Elected INR 1million per Experience sharing ULB level representatives visit @ 10 participants Subproject level MPUDC staff INR 1x 10= INR in 1 group and2 ULB officials 10million groups in a year Project beneficiaries Total INR 26million 11.2. External Support MPUDC would seek external advisory support at two-levels: State and ULB. The costs associated with these external advisors would be met from the TA component under Institutional Development component of MPUDP. 78 ESMF 11.3. Subproject Costs Any and all measurable (at the time of DPR preparation) physical costs essential for social and environmental mitigation measures, will form a part of the subproject capital costs. Such costs will be reflected in the EIA or SIA of the respective subproject. All the items which cannot be envisaged or measured at the time of DPR conceptualization will be reflected in the Bid Document as Provisional sum which will be kept with ULB or MPUDC as the case may be. In addition, costs to be incurred during subproject preparation would form a part of the design consultant’s costs, and the costs to be incurred for monitoring the subproject implementation would form a part of the supervision consultants / engineer’s costs. The cost of DPR preparation for some of the subprojects is proposed to be met through the TA or ULB funding under MPUDP. 79 ESMF Appendix Appendix 1: Screening Checklist Environmental Screening Checklist Project Id: __________ Name of the ULB: ___________________ Project Location: (Provide Latitude and Longitude information as well along with complete address) _______________________________ Project Sector: (Such as Water Supply, MSW, Urban Road, etc.) ________________________ Proposed Loan Source for Project _____________________ (to be filled in by MPUDC) Project Components Sl.no Components Details 1. Brief description of the project concept and configuration 2. Number of Project sites and Ancillary (such as pipelines, access roads, etc.) components 3. Details of Alignment and Component 4. Location of the Project Sites & Current Use (Provide information for all sites involved in the project) Project Proximity to Environmental Sensitive Aspects Sr. No. Components Yes No Details 5. Notified Protected Areas (National Parks/ Wildlife Sanctuaries, Eco- Sensitive Zones, Biosphere Reserves, Ramsar Sites, Mangrove forests, etc.) Important Bird Areas in India (Ref: 6. Priority sites for conservation, BNHS) 7. Scheduled Areas 80 ESMF 8. State borders (overlapping resource sharing such as rivers, lakes, roads etc.) Hazard Prone Areas (Floods, 9. Earthquakes, Wind / Cyclones), Vulnerability Atlas of India, BMTPC 10. Climate Change impacted area (water intakes in CC affected rivers, lakes), MP State Climate Change Action Plan and Other Sources Critically polluted areas (such as Indore 11. Industrial cluster in MP) Land-use (Sensitive receptors hospitals, 12. residential areas, schools) Pre-existing litigations concerning E&S 13. issues with the Project location or site Archeological Survey of India (ASI) 14. sites Socio-Cultural- Economic activities 15. (religious/heritage/ cultural sites, tourist interests, etc.) Defense installations, especially those of 16. security importance and sensitive to pollution 17. Does the Project Involve the following: 18. Vegetation removal and Cutting of trees 19. Potential Habitat fragmentation Quarrying, Mining or Resource 20. Extraction Excessive Resource Consumption or 21. Waste Generation, Cutting and Filling of Earth Risk to Neighborhood Community 22. Health Use / release of Hazardous Chemicals, 23. toxic materials 81 ESMF Generation of Air Emissions, 24. Wastewater, Solid Wastes (including Hazardous Waste) Is the project design considering energy 25. conservation measures/ energy recovery options? Is the project considering waste 26. minimisation or waste reuse/recycle options? Has the project design considered RWH or 27. any other environmental enhancement measure? Has the project design considered extreme 28. events, drought, flood, natural disasters? Social Screening Checklist Name of the ULB: ____________________ Project Location: (Provide Latitude and Longitude information as well along with complete address) _______________________________ Project Sector: (Such as Water Supply, MSW, Urban Road, etc.) ________________________ Land Use, Resettlement, and/or Land Acquisition Sr. Components Yes No Details No Does the project involve acquisition 1 of private land? Alienation of any type of Government 2 land including that owned by Urban Local Body? Clearance of encroachment from 3 Government/ Urban Local body Land? Clearance of squatters/hawkers from 4 Government/ Urban Local Body Land? 82 ESMF Number of structures, both authorized 5 and/or unauthorized to be acquired/ cleared/ Number of household to be 6 displaced? Details of village common properties to be alienated Pasture Land (acres) 7 Cremation/ burial ground and others specify? Describe existing land uses on and around the project area (e.g., 8 community facilities, agriculture, tourism, private property)? Will the project result in the permanent or temporary loss of the following? Specify with numbers 9 Crops, Fruit trees / coconut palms, Petty Shops/ Kiosks, Vegetable / Fish / Meat vending, Cycle repair shop, Garage, Tea Stalls, Grazing Lands, etc. Loss of access to forest produce 10 (NTFP) Is the project likely to provide local employment opportunities, including 11 employment opportunities for women? Is the project being planned with 12 sufficient attention to local poverty alleviation objectives? Is the project being designed with sufficient local participation 13 (including the participation of women) in the planning, design, and implementation process? 83 ESMF Population proposed to be benefitted 14 by the proposed project No. of Females proposed to be 15 benefitted by the proposed project Vulnerable households /population to 16 be benefitted 17 No. of BPL Families to be benefitted Are there socio-cultural groups present in or use the subproject area who may be considered as "tribes" (hill tribes, schedules tribes, tribal peoples), "minorities" (ethnic or national minorities), or "indigenous communities" in the subproject area? Are there national or local laws or policies as well as anthropological researches/studies that consider these groups present in or using the 18 subproject area as belonging to "ethnic minorities", scheduled tribes, tribal peoples, national minorities, or cultural communities? Do such groups self-identify as being 19 part of a distinct social and cultural group? Do such groups maintain collective attachments to distinct habitats or 20 ancestral territories and/or to the natural resources in these habitats and territories? Do such groups maintain cultural, economic, social, and political 21 institutions distinct from the dominant society and culture? Do such groups speak a distinct 22 language or dialect? 84 ESMF Have such groups been historically, socially and economically 23 marginalized, disempowered, excluded, and/or discriminated against? Are such groups represented as "Indigenous Peoples" or as "ethnic minorities" or "scheduled tribes" or 24 "tribal populations" in any formal decision-making bodies at the national or local levels? Will the subproject directly or 25 indirectly benefit or target Indigenous Peoples? Will the subproject directly or indirectly affect Indigenous Peoples' 26 traditional socio-cultural and belief practices? (e.g., child-rearing, health, education, arts, and governance)? Will the subproject affect the livelihood systems of Indigenous 27 Peoples? (e.g., food production system, natural resource management, crafts and trade, employment status)? Will the subproject be in an area (land or territory) occupied, owned, or used 28 by Indigenous Peoples, and/or claimed as ancestral domain? 85 ESMF Appendix 2: Terms of Reference for ESA Studies An ESA report for MPUDP should focus on the significant environmental, social, health, and safety issues of the proposed project, whether it is, or includes, new construction, rehabilitation, or expansion. The report’s scope and level of detail should be commensurate with the project’s potential impacts. The ESA report should include the following items: (a) Executive summary. Concisely discusses significant findings and recommended actions. (b) Policy, legal, and administrative framework: Discusses the policy, legal, and administrative framework within which the ESA is carried out. Identifies relevant international environmental agreements to which the country is a party. (c) Project description. Concisely describes the proposed project and its geographic, ecological, social, and temporal context, including any off-site investments that may be required (e.g., dedicated pipelines, access roads, power plants, water supply, housing, and raw material and product storage facilities). Indicates the need for any resettlement plan. Normally includes a map showing the project site and the project’s area of influence. (d) Baseline data. Assesses the dimensions of the study area and describes relevant physical, biological, and socioeconomic conditions, including any changes anticipated before the project commences. Also takes into account current and proposed development activities within the project area but not directly connected to the project. Data should be relevant to decisions about project location, design, operation, or migratory measures. The section indicates the accuracy, reliability and source of the data. (e) Environmental and social impacts. Predicts and assesses the project’s likely positive and negative impacts (including indirect and cumulative impacts, if any), in quantitative terms to the greatest extent possible. Identifies mitigation measures and any residual negative impacts that cannot be mitigated. Explores opportunities for environmental enhancement. Identifies and estimates the extent and quality of available data, key data gaps, and uncertainties associated with predictions, and specifies topics that do not require further attention. (f) Analysis of alternatives. Systematically compares feasible alternatives to the proposed project site, technology, design, and operation—including the “without project” situation—in terms of their potential environmental impacts; the feasibility of mitigating these impacts; their capital and recurrent costs; their suitability under local conditions; and their institutional, training, and monitoring requirements. For each of the alternatives, quantifies the environmental impacts to the greatest extent possible and attaches economic values where feasible. States the basis for selecting the particular project design and justifies recommended emissions levels and approaches to pollution prevention and abatement. (g) Environmental management plan (EMP). Covers mitigation measures, monitoring, budget requirements, and funding sources for implementation as well as institutional strengthening and capacity building requirements. 86 ESMF The EMP should be easy to use. References within the plan should be clearly and readily identifiable. Also, the main text of the EMP needs to be kept as clear and concise as possible, with detailed information relegated to annexes. The EMP should identify linkages to other relevant plans relating to the project, such as plans dealing with resettlement or indigenous peoples issues. The following aspects should typically be addressed within EMPs. Summary of impacts: The predicted adverse environmental and social impacts for which mitigation is required should be identified and briefly summarized. Cross-referencing to the ESA report or other documentation is recommended so that additional details can be readily referenced. Description of mitigation measures: The EMP identifies feasible and cost-effective measures to reduce potentially significant adverse environmental and social impacts to acceptable levels. Each mitigation measure should be briefly described with reference to the impact to which it relates and the conditions under which it is required (e.g., continuously or in the event of contingencies). These should be accompanied by, or referenced to, designs, equipment descriptions, and operating procedures that elaborate on the technical aspects of implementing the various measures. Where mitigation measures may result in secondary impacts, their significance should be evaluated. Description of monitoring program: Environmental performance monitoring should be designed to ensure that mitigation measures are implemented and have the intended result, and that remedial measures are undertaken if mitigation measures are inadequate or the impacts were underestimated within the ESA report. It should also assess compliance with national standards and World Bank Group requirements or guidelines. The monitoring program should clearly indicate the linkages between impacts identified in the ESA report, indicators to be measured, methods to be used, sampling locations, frequency of measurements, detection limits (where appropriate), and definition of thresholds that will signal the need for corrective actions. Although it is not essential to have complete details of monitoring in the EMP, it should describe the means by which final monitoring arrangements will be agreed. Institutional arrangements: Responsibilities for mitigation and monitoring should be clearly defined. The EMP should identify arrangements for coordination between the various actors responsible for mitigation. (h) Appendixes (a) List of EA report preparers—individuals and organizations. (b) References—written materials, both published and unpublished, used in study preparation. (c) Record of interagency and consultation meetings, including consultations for obtaining the informed views of the affected people and local nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). The record specifies any means other than consultations (e.g., surveys) that were used to obtain the views of affected groups and local NGOs. (d) Tables presenting the relevant data referred to or summarized in the main text. (e) List of associated reports (e.g., socioeconomic baseline survey, resettlement plan) 87 ESMF Terms of Reference for the External Audit of Subprojects The following is the ToR for conducting the external audit on an annual basis. (i) To undertake a desk review of selected subproject documentation to determine how effectively social and environmental issues have been integrated. As part of the desk review, to have discussions with MPUDC, ULBs and consultants (design, social, environmental, supervision, etc.). (ii) To carry out field visits to selected subprojects to assess how social and environmental issues have been addressed on the ground. As part of the field visits, to have discussions with the ULBs, supervision consultants and contractors. (iii) To assess the completeness and appropriateness of the SMPs/RAPs and EMPs based on the field visit observations. (iv) To determine compliance of subprojects to national, state and local legal requirements based on the field visit observations. (v) To review the monitoring reports prepared by the supervision consultants and verify how these reflect the ground realities of the subproject implementation. (vi) To prepare an audit report that clearly specifies (i) the deviations in implementing social and environmental measures, if any, (ii) positive measures taken at the subproject level, if any, and (iii) suggestions for further improvement of social and environmental management practices at the subproject level. (vii) To review the action taken by MPUDC a month after the submission of the audit report, and to submit an audit compliance report. 88 ESMF Appendix 3: Generic Environmental and Social Management Plan for Typical MPUDP Subprojects Table 1: Generic ESMP for Water Supply Subprojects Subproject Impacts Mitigation Measures Project Responsibili Phase ty Head Works/ Acquisition of Private  Avoid or minimize the area of acquisition Planning / ULB Intake Agricultural land or Forest design  Preparation of adequate land acquisition plans structures land or land availability plan for each of the civil works component before implementation Loss of trees and  Compensatory planting should be done. Construct ULB/ vegetation ion Contractor  Plant double the number of trees cut Reduced flow to the  Regulate flow to downstream use Planning / ULB downstream users design Erosion and sedimentation  Catchment treatment including gully plugging Planning / ULB design Disruption vegetation and  Avoidance of disruption to grasslands, Planning / ULB to eco-system wetlands and other riparian areas design Disruption to visual  Landscaping permanent facility sites with Construct ULB/ resources trees, shrubs and grasses ion Contractor Water Acquisition of Private  Avoid or minimize the area of acquisition Planning / ULB Treatment Agricultural land or forest design  Preparation of adequate land acquisition plans Plants land before implementation Loss of trees and  Compensatory planting should be done. Construct ULB vegetation ion  Plant double the number of trees cut Disruption to vegetation  Avoidance of disruption to grasslands, Construct ULB/ and eco-system wetlands and other riparian areas ion Contractor 89 ESMF Accumulation of  Transportation and disposal of excess earth to Construct Contractor excavated earth in the a designated disposal site ion areas of operation causing inconvenience to public Increased dust levels due  Immediate shifting of excavated earth Construct Contractor to earth work excavation ion  Frequent sprinkling of water on excavated and construction activities earth  Washing of construction site to control dust Disturbance to other  Scheduling activities in consultation with the Construct ULB Utilities other utility agencies and public and ensuring ion minimum disturbance to the utilities Water Increased air pollution and  Preventive maintenance of equipment and Construct Contractor Treatment Noise Levels during vehicles to meet emission standards and noise ion Plants Construction control, [Continued]  Provision of Personal Protective equipment, ear muffs, etc. for the construction labor  Avoiding construction activities during nights Social disruption  Preference to local labour Construct Contractor ion Impact to groundwater due  Sludge lagoons should be constructed to treat O&M ULB to discharge of sludge the sludge Safety hazards to  Provision of temporary crossings/ bridges in O&M Contractor households in the the implementation area neighborhood Hazards due to storage of  Training to operators on storage and usage of O&M ULB chemicals chemicals Rising Mains/ Acquisition of Private  Avoid or minimize the area of acquisition Planning / ULB Agricultural land or forest 90 ESMF Gravity Mains land  Preparation of adequate land acquisition plans design Feeder Mains/ before implementation Distribution Loss of trees and  Compensatory planting should be done. Construct ULB Mains vegetation ion  Plant double the number of trees cut Extension to Vulnerable Temporary Disruption of  Provision of appropriate by-pass arrangements Construct Contractor Sections natural drainage pattern for natural drainage during construction ion Loss of fertile top soil of  Preserve the topsoil removed and replace the Construct Contractor the Agriculture Lands topsoil back after completion of construction ion activity. Disturbance to traffic and  Actions to divert and regulate traffic in public Construct Contractor general public consultation with citizens in advance ion  While planning alternate route care should be taken to minimize impact at sensitive locations such as schools and hospitals  Signals and signs of diversion should be provided Disruption of Utilities  Preparation of utility shifting or safe guarding Construct Contractor such as electricity, plans ion telephone and other  Getting appropriate approvals / permissions in services. advance  Carrying out shifting or safe guarding arrangements at the earliest possible time Rising Mains/ Increase in dust levels to  Immediate shifting of excavated earth Construct Contractor Gravity Mains due to earth work and ion  Frequent sprinkling of water on excavated other construction Feeder Mains/ earth activities Distribution  Washing of construction site to control dust 91 ESMF Mains Accumulation of Excess  Disposal of unused / excess earth at an Construct Contractor Extension to Earth environmentally suitable disposal site ion Vulnerable Damage to roads  Reinstatement of Road Surface in earliest Construct Contractor Sections possible time ion [Continued]  Loss of livelihood / temporary loss of excess will be avoided Increased Noise Levels  Use of low noise generating equipment for all Construct Contractor during Construction the activities, ion  Provision of Personal Protective equipment, ear muffs, etc. for the construction labor  Preventive maintenance of equipment and vehicles  Avoiding construction activities during nights Risk of accidents  Effective safety and warning measures Construct Contractor ion  Temporary crossings across the pipeline trench wherever necessary Damage to standing crops  Adequate provisions for compensation to the O&M ULB during break down of the affected land owners during maintenance transmission main works Overhead/ Standing out as Eyesore in  Architecture and design to take surroundings Preparatio ULB/ PMC Ground level the surroundings into account n Reservoirs Disruption to visual  Landscaping permanent facility sites with Construct ULB resources trees, shrubs and grasses ion Accumulation of  Transportation and disposal of excess earth to Construct Contractor excavated earth in the a designated disposal site ion areas of operation causing inconvenience to public 92 ESMF Increased dust levels due  Immediate shifting of excavated earth Construct Contractor to earth work excavation  Frequent sprinkling of water on excavated ion and construction activities earth  Washing of construction site to control dust Overhead/ Increased Noise Levels  Use of low noise generating equipment for all Construct Contractor Ground level during Construction the activities, ion Reservoirs  Provision of Personal Protective equipment, [Continued] ear muffs, etc. for the construction labor  Preventive maintenance of equipment and vehicles  Avoiding construction activities during nights Risk of accidents  Effective safety and warning measures Construct Contractor ion  Temporary crossings across the pipeline trench wherever necessary Water Tankers Risk of accidents  Effective safety and warning measures O&M Contractor Increased Noise Levels  Purchase low noise generating vehicles Planning / ULB/ PMC/ during operation design Contractor  Provision of Personal Protective equipment and earmuffs. etc. for the operators Construct ion  Preventive maintenance of vehicles  Avoiding operation during nights Table 2: Generic Environmental Management Plan for Sewerage Subprojects Subproject Impacts Mitigation Measures Project Phase Responsibility Sewage Acquisition of Private Avoid or minimize the area of acquisition Planning / design ULB/ PMC/ Treatment Agricultural land or forest MPUDC Preparation of adequate land acquisition plans 93 ESMF Plant, Sewage land before implementation Pumping Loss of trees and vegetation Compensatory planting should be done. Construction ULB/ Stations MPUDC Plant double the number of trees cut Disruption to vegetation Avoidance of disruption to grasslands, Construction ULB/ and eco-system wetlands and other riparian areas MPUDC/ Contractor Accumulation of excavated Transportation and disposal of excess earth to Construction Contractor earth in the areas of a designated disposal site operation causing inconvenience to public Increased dust levels due to Immediate shifting of excavated earth Construction Contractor earth work excavation and Frequent sprinkling of water on excavated construction activities earth Washing of construction site to control dust Disturbance to other Scheduling activities in consultation with the Construction ULB/ Utilities other utility agencies and public and ensuring MPUDC minimum disturbance to the utilities Increased air pollution and Preventive maintenance of equipment and Construction Contractor Noise Levels during vehicles to meet emission standards and noise Construction control, Provision of Personal Protective equipment, ear muffs, etc. for the construction labor Avoiding construction activities during nights Disturbance to eco-system Avoidance of eco-sensitive areas Construction Contractor and bio-diversity Protective measures for Bio-diversity Surface water /groundwater Treatment units should be operated regularly Operation ULB/ pollution due to discharge to produce effluent to meet the effluent Operator 94 ESMF of sludge and effluent standards Hazards due to storage of Training to operators on storage and usage of Operation ULB/ chemicals chemicals Operator Air pollution through Ventilating shafts are located in such a way Construction MPUDC/ ventilating shaft not causing pollution in to the nearby houses Contractor Operation Public Loss of trees and vegetation  Compensatory planting should be done. Construction ULB/Contractor Conveniences  Plant double the number of trees cut Nuisance to public  Regular collection and disposal of waste Planning / design ULB/ PMC/ Operator  Grow trees around the facility Contamination by human  Regular cleaning of toilets Operation ULB/ Operator waste/ excreta  Connection to sewerage system  Provision for hand washing and toilets Accumulation of excavated  Transportation and disposal of excess Construction Contractor earth at site in causing earth to a designated disposal site inconvenience to public Increased dust levels due to  Immediate shifting of excavated earth Construction Contractor earth work excavation and  Frequent sprinkling of water on construction activities excavated earth  Washing of construction site to control dust Disturbance to other Utilities  Scheduling activities in consultation with Construction Contractor the other utility agencies and public and ensuring minimum disturbance to the utilities 95 ESMF Increased air pollution and  Ventilating shafts are located in such a Construction ULB/ Contractor/ smell way not causing pollution in to the Operator Operation nearby houses Regular cleaning and maintenance of facility  Grow fragrance bearing plants around the facility Storm Water Land Acquisition of Private  Preparation of adequate land acquisition Planning / design ULB/ PMC Drainage, Under Agricultural land for laying the plans before implementation with Ground transmission main disturbance of minimum area Sewerage Disturbance to eco-system and  Avoidance of eco-sensitive areas Planning / design PMC/ Contractor bio-diversity  Protective measures for Bio-diversity Construction Ecological impacts due to  Compensatory tree planting of trees Planning / design ULB/ Contractor cutting of trees double the number of trees cut Construction Loss of fertile top soil of the  Preserve the topsoil removed and replace Construction Contractor Agriculture Lands along the the topsoil back after completion of alignment construction activity. Temporary Disruption of  Provision of appropriate by-pass Construction Contractor natural drainage pattern arrangements for natural drainage during construction Stagnation of water on the road  Proper design of grade for the edge Planning / design PMC drains and lateral drains and size of inlets Stagnation leading to mosquito  Providing proper section and grades to Planning / design PMC breeding and public health drains problems and surface water  Covering the drains pollution Lowering of groundwater table  Scheduling construction activities of Construction Contractor due to pumping of water deeper sections in summer months to during excavation avoid huge pumping 96 ESMF Stagnation of sewage, odor  Strict adherence of pumping schedule Operation ULB/ Operator problem Overflow causes water pollution in channels and water bodies Ugly and unsightly conditions Cross contamination of water  Sewer line should be laid below water Construction PMC/ ULB/ supply pipeline supply line with vertical clearance of Contractor 45cm and horizontal separation of joints by 3m on both sides Storm Water Disturbance to the general  Actions to divert and regulate traffic in Planning / design ULB/ PMC/ Drainage, Under public and vehicle movements consultation with citizens in advance Construction Contractor Ground through citizen’s meeting Sewerage  While planning alternate route care [Continued] should be taken to minimize impact at sensitive locations such as schools and hospitals  Signals and signs of diversion should be provided Disruption of Utilities such as  Preparation of Plan for shifting or safe Planning / design ULB/ PMC/ electricity, telephone and other guarding of utilities and getting Contractor services appropriate approvals / permissions in advance from the concern agencies  Carrying out shifting or safe guarding arrangements at the earliest possible time Storage of materials causing  Suitable sites should be identified for Planning / design ULB/ PMC/ disturbance to public and storage of materials Contractor traffic 97 ESMF Excavated earth on the road  Disposal of unused / excess earth at an Construction Contractor causing inconvenience to environmentally suitable disposal site public Disturbance to traffic and  Actions to divert and regulate traffic in Construction ULB/ Contractor general public consultation with citizens in advance through citizen’s meeting  While planning alternate route care should be taken to minimize impact at sensitive locations such as schools and hospitals  Signals and signs of diversion should be provided Damage to road surface /other  Reinstatement of Road Surface in earliest Construction Contractor utilities possible time Risk of accidents  Effective safety and warning measures Construction Contractor  Temporary crossings across the pipeline trench wherever necessary Cultural relics  Fossils, coins, articles of value and other Construction ULB/ Contractor remains of geologic or archeological interests if found shall be informed to the authorized institution and excavation shall be stopped Storm Water Cultural relics  Fossils, coins, articles of value and other Construction ULB/ Contractor Drainage, Under remains of geologic or archeological Ground interests if found shall be informed to the Sewerage authorized institution and excavation [Continued] shall be stopped Increase in Air pollution and  Sprinkling water /washing of Construction Contractor dust levels due to construction construction site to control dust 98 ESMF activities Increased Noise level  Preventive maintenance of equipment Construction Contractor and vehicles to reduce noise  Sound barriers in inhibited areas shall be provided  Safety devices such as ear plugs are provided to workers Air pollution through  Ventilating shafts are located in such a Planning / design PMC / PMC/ ventilating shaft way not causing pollution in to the Contractor Construction nearby houses Increase in dust levels to due  Take suitable measures to control dust Construction to earth work and other through sprinkling/washing of construction activities construction site Dust, Noise due to movement  Preventive maintenance of equipment Construction Contractor of vehicles and vehicles to reduce noise  Sound barriers in inhibited areas shall be provided  Safety devices such as ear plugs are provided to workers Projection/depression of  Proper planning of road construction with Construction Contractor Manhole covers on the road fixing the formation level surface causing inconvenience  Strict quality control in road construction to public; leading to accident Social disruption  Preference to local labour Construction Contractor Leakage causes nuisance  Leaks should be identifies and rectified Operation ULB/ Operator then and there 99 ESMF Table 3: Generic Social Management Plan for Sa (High) & Sb (Moderate) Category Projects Social Assessment YES NO If Yes, Specify Details Social Management Measures Estimated Cost in INR 1. Is there loss of i. Total area of land acquired No. of HHs (with valid title) to be given developed i. dwelling land and ii. Total no. of HHs losing their plots and house structure? dwelling land and structure ii. No. of HHs to be given cash compensation = iii. No. of squatters to be given developed plots and house = iv. No .of HHs to be given shifting allowance = v. No. of HHs to be given transitional assistance = 2. Is there loss of i. Total agricultural area acquired i.No. of HHs (with valid title) to be given agricultural land ii. Total No. of HHs losing their land alternative land = and structure? and structure No. of HHs (with valid title) to be given cash ii. iii. Total No. of tenant / leaseholder / compensation = No. of individuals to be given cash sharecroppers losing their tenancy iii. compensation = iv. Total no. of agricultural iv. No. of individual tenants / leaseholder / labourers losing their livelihood sharecroppers to be given cash assistance = v. No. of individuals to be given notice for harvesting = vi. No. of individuals to be given cash compensation for non-perennial crops = vii. No. of individuals to be paid cash compensation for perennial crops = viii. No. of individuals to be paid cash assistance for loss of agricultural labour = 100 ESMF 3. Is there loss of  No. of HHs (with valid title) i. No. of units (with valid title ) to be given commercial/ losing their land and structure alternative land = ... industrial/  No. of tenants/ leaseholders ii. No. of units (with valid title) to be given cash Institutional land compensation = losing their land and structure and structure? iii. No. of units (with valid title) to be given  No. of squatters / encroachers losing livelihood assistance = their land and structure iv. No. of tenants to be given livelihood assistance  No. of employees losing their = livelihood v. No. of tenants to be given shifting assistance = vi. No. of squatters to be given developed plot and built shop = vii. No. of squatters / encroacher to be given cash compensation = viii. No. of squatters to be given shifting assistance = ix. No. of squatters to be given livelihood assistance =...... x. No. of employees to be given livelihood assistance = 4. Is there loss of i. Specify type of CPR being lost i. No. of HHs to be provided CPRs =100 access to common ii. No. of HHs losing their access to ii. No. of HHs to be provided amenities = resources and or CPRs facilities? 5. Are there losses to i. Specify the type of losses i. Money to be spent on restoration of losses due to host communities? ii.No. of communities losing their resettlement = amenities/ services ii. Money to be spent on restoration of amenities = 6. Is there any impact i. No. of HHs on indigenous people? 7. Is there any induced 101 ESMF development? 8. Was the land i. When was this done? i. No. of HHs (with valid title) to be given land for acquired / bought / ii. Total area of land acquired / land = transferred prior to the bought / transferred ii. No. of HHs to be given cash compensation = present ownership of iii. Usage of land earlier to ULBs iii. No of HHs to be given livelihood assistance = ULBs? possession iv. No. of squatters to be given developed plots and iv. iv. Amount paid as compensation house / shop = v. Total No. of HHs from whom it v. No. of squatters / encroachers to be given cash was bought compensation = vi. No. of HHs evicted from the land vi. No .of squatters to be given livelihood assistance = 102 ESMF Appendix 4: List of Schedule Areas in Madhya Pradesh List of Schedule Areas in Madhya Pradesh as Specified by the Scheduled Areas under the fifth Schedule of Indian Constitutions 1. Jhabua district 2. Mandla district 3. Dindori district 4. Barwani district 5. Sardarpur, Dhar, Kukshi, Dharampuri, Gandhwani and Manawar tahsils in Dhar district 6. Bhagwanpura, Segaon, Bhikangaon, Jhirniya, Khargone and Meheshwar tahsils in Khargone (West Nimar) district 7. Khalwa Tribal Development Block of Harsud tahsil and Khaknar Tribal Development Block of Khaknar tahsil in Khandwa (East Nimar) district 8. Sailana and Bajna tahsils in Ratlam district 9. Shajapur tahsil (excluding Shajapur Development Block) and Bhainsdehi and Shahpur tahsils in Shajapur district 10. Lakhanadone, Ghansaur and Kurai tahsils in Seoni district 11. Baihar tahsil in Balaghat district 12. Kesla Tribal Development Block of Itarsi tahsil in Hoshangabad district 13. Pushparajgarh, Anuppur, Jaithari, Kotma, Jaitpur, Sohagpur and Jaisinghnagar tahsils of Shahdol district 14. Pali Tribal Development Block in Pali tahsil of Umaria district 15. Kusmi Tribal Development Block in Kusmi tahsil of Sidhi district 16. Karahal Tribal Development Block in Karahal tahsil of Sheopur district 17. Tamia and Jamai tahsils, patwari circle Nos. 10 to 12 and 16 to 19, villages Siregaon Khurd and Kirwari in patwari circle no. 09, villages Mainawari and Gaulie Parasia of patwari circle No. 13 in Parasia tahsil, village Bamhani of Patwari circle No. 25 in Chhindwara tahsil, Harai Tribal Development Block and patwari circle Nos. 28 to 36,41,43,44 and 45B in Amarwara tahsil Bichhua tahsil and patwari circle Nos. 05,08,09,10,11 and 14 in Saunsar tahsil, Patwari circle Nos. 01 to 11 and 13 to 26, and patwari circle no. 12 (excluding village Bhuli), village Nandpur of patwari circle No. 27, villages Nikanth and Dhawdikhapa of patwari circle no 28 in Pandurna tahsil of Chhindwara district. 103 ESMF List of Tribal Communities in State of Madhya Pradesh as Provided by Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India 1. Agariya 2. Andh 3. Baiga 4. Bhaina 5. Bharia Bhumia, Bhuinhar Bhumia, Bhumiya, Bharia, Paliha, Pando 6. Bhattra 7. Bhil, Bhilala, Barela, Patelia 8. Bhil Mina 9. Bhunjia 10. Biar, Biyar 11. Binjhwar 12. Birhul, Birhor 13. Damor, Damaria 14. Dhanwar 15. Gadaba, Gadba 16. Gond; Arakh, Arrakh, Agaria, Asur, Badi Maria, Bada Maria, Bhatola, Bhimma, Bhuta, Koilabhuta, Koliabhuti, Bhar, Bisonhorn Maria, Chota Maria, Dandami Maria, Dhuru, Dhurwa, Dhoba, Dhulia, Dorla, Gaiki, Gatta, Gatti, Gaita, Gond Gowari, Hill Maria, Kandra, Kalanga, Khatola, Koitar, Koya, Khirwar, Khirwara, Kucha Maria, Kuchaki Maria, Madia, Maria, Mana, Mannewar, Moghya, Mogia, Monghya, Mudia, Muria, Nagarchi, Nagwanshi, Ojha, Raj, Sonjhari Jhareka, Thatia, Thotya, Wade Maria, Vade Maria, Daroi 17. Halba, Halbi 18. Kamar 19. Karku 20. Kawar, Kanwar, Kaur, Cherwa, Rathia, Tanwar, Chattri 21. (Omitted) 22. Khairwar, Kondar 23. Kharia 24. Kondh, Khond, Kandh 25. Kol 26. Kolam 27. Korku, Bopchi, Mouasi, Nihal, Nahul Bondhi, Bondeya 28. Korwa, Kodaku 29. Majhi 30. Majhwar 31. Mawasi 104 ESMF 32. Omitted 33. Munda 34. Nagesia, Nagasia 35. Oraon, Dhanka, Dhangad 36. Panika [in (i) Chhatarpur, Panna, Rewa, Satna, Shahdol, Umaria, Sidhi and Tikamgarh districts, and (ii) Sevda and Datia tehsils of Datia district] 37. Pao 38. Pardhan, Pathari, Saroti 39. Omitted 40. Pardhi, Bahelia, Bahellia, Chita Pardhi, Langoli Pardhi, Phans Pardhi, Shikari, Takankar, Takia [In (i) Chhindwara, Mandla, Dindori and Seoni districts, (ii) Baihar Tahsil of Balaghat District, (iii) Shajapur, Bhainsdehi and Shahpur tahsils of Shajapur district, (iv) Patan tahsil and Sihora and Majholi blocks of Jabalpur district, (v) Katni (Murwara) and Vijaya Raghogarh tahsils and Bahoriband and Dhemerkheda blocks of Katni district, (vi) Hoshangabad , Babai, Sohagpur, Pipariya and Bankhedi tahsils and Kesla block of Hoshangabad district, (vii) Narsinghpur district, and (viii) Harsud Tahsil of Khandwa district] 41. Parja 42. Sahariya, Saharia, Seharia, Sehria, Sosia, Sor 43. Saonta, Saunta 44. Saur 45. Sawar, Sawara 46. Sonr 105 ESMF Appendix 5: Stakeholder Consultation and Disclosure The overall goal of the consultation process was to disseminate project information and to incorporate the views of the project beneficiaries and Project Affected Persons (PAPs) in the design of ESMF and the mitigation measures and a management plans for the respective subprojects.. 1. Initial Consultations in Project Towns Preparation of ESMF involved series of consultations with stakeholders of subproject towns (8 towns for which the preparation is in advanced stage) and also at the state level. The details of these consultations are provided below. S. No. Project town No. of Type of Stakeholder Dates participants M F 1 Burhanpur Consultations with primary 29th March 2016 18 07 & Secondary stakeholders 2 Chhindwara Consultations with primary 2nd April 2016 20 10 & Secondary stakeholders 3 Maheshwar Consultations with primary 29th March 2016 25 10 & Secondary stakeholders 4 Mandsaur Consultations with primary 6th April 2016 15 13 & Secondary stakeholders 5 Khargone Consultations with primary 30th March 2016 20 10 & Secondary stakeholders 6 Shajapur Consultations with primary 2nd April 2016 12 08 & Secondary stakeholders 7 Seondha Consultations with primary 6th April 2016 10 05 & Secondary stakeholders (Sewda) 8 Nasrullaganj Consultations with primary 26th March 2016 15 10 & Secondary stakeholders Total 135 73 Key out comes of initial Consultations conducted on ESMF:  All participants welcomed theproject and agreed on the provision of mitigation measures in the project during implementation. 106 ESMF  Concerns regarding Environment and social issues related to implementation and operations were welcomed by the public.  Participants (primary stakeholders)were happy to knowabout the project as Burhanpur and Khargone facing water problems and Chhindwara have sewerage problem. It was assured to stakeholders that there will be no adverse impacton livelihood or resettlement.  Positive impacts discussed with stakeholders, it was happily welcomed.  During consultations stakeholder realised the present system was having adverse effects on the health of the society.  The perceived problem ofadverse impact of the project on the livelihood of a section of the population was againbrought out during the public consultation where all the doubts of the people were cleared. 2. Issues/reason of poor operation and maintenance of water supply system discussed during consultation and stakeholder realised the revenue generation from water tariff helps to O &M. Consultation in first year subproject towns Additionally, town specific consultations for three of the subprojects to be implemented in the first year of MPUDP (Khargone, Burhanpur and Chhindwara) were also carried out Public sensitization and inclusion meetings were held within the wards of the project area as per details given below: Subproject Dates Participants Burhanpur (9 meetings) rd 23 April’ 2016 to 25th 239 (M-154 and F-85) April’ 2016 Khargone (10meetings) 18th April’ 2016 to 19th (M-119 and F- 81) April’ 2016 Chhindwara (11meetings) th 28 April 2016 to 30th April 263 (M-160 and F-103) 2016 Key out comes of Public Consultations conducted on ESAs and ESMF are summarized below:  Concerns regarding Environment and social issues related to implementation and operations were welcomed by the public.  Peoples demanded for proper traffic signage during excavation, for minimizing the casualties  The people showed concerned on hiked water tariff, discussed affordability for low income group people.  Like other projects community complaints regarding excavation remain unheard or not resolve timely. 107 ESMF  All participants welcomed theproject and get satisfied with themitigation measures suggested during implementation.  Participants (primary stakeholders)were happy to knowabout the project, but showed concerned regarding negative impact, officials assured thatthere will be no adverse impacton livelihood of people will be tried to avoid/minimised if it is unavoidable. Positive impacts discussed with stakeholders, it was happily welcomed.  Increased the acacceptance of project by stakeholders realised during consultations.  During consultations stakeholder realised the present system causing adverse effects on the health of the residents in some areas.  The perceived problem ofadverse impact of the project on the livelihood of a section of the population was againbrought out during the public consultation where all the doubts of the people were cleared. 108 ESMF Consultation in first year subproject towns I- Draft ESMF Consultation and disclosure at Khargone Photographs of Draft ESMF Consultation 109 ESMF Public Disclosure 110 ESMF Minutes of Draft ESMF Consultation: 111 ESMF 112 ESMF 113 ESMF 114 ESMF II- Draft ESMF Consultation at Burhanpur Photographs 115 ESMF 116 ESMF 117 ESMF 118 ESMF 119 ESMF III- Draft ESMF Consultation at Chhindwara Photographs of Draft ESMF Consultation Publicity of the Disclosure consultations at Chhindwara 120 ESMF 121 ESMF 122 ESMF 123 ESMF Minutes of Meeting 124 ESMF 125 ESMF 126 ESMF 127 ESMF 128 ESMF 3. Regional level Consultation for Draft disclosure of ESMF Regional level consultation held on 7th September 2016 at Directorate, Urban Administration and Development, M.P., Bhopal. Detail Minutes of consultation given below: 129 ESMF 130 ESMF 131 ESMF 132 ESMF 133 ESMF 134 ESMF 135 ESMF 136 ESMF New paper clipping, Dainik Bhaskar(Hindi News Paper) 137 ESMF