urban housing and land;housing sector;high levels of output;capital need;Incremental Capital-Output Ratio;large volume of remittance;poverty elasticity of growth;increase ...  See More + in land price;land use regulation;land development process;elasticity of poverty;cost of housing;rates of urbanization;cost housing;quality of growth;per capita income;housing subsidy program;amount of land;fixed capital stock;slum upgrading program;ownership of land;interest rate subsidy;public land ownership;efficiency of capital;quality of house;land and housing;informal housing sector;capital output ratio;limited job opportunities;quality and quantity;rights of way;supply of service;land development regulation;reduction in poverty;housing supply policies;rate of growth;central government support;people in poverty;elasticity of supply;floor area ratio;measure of outcome;access to land;poverty headcount index;amount of income;water and sewerage;sector adjustment loan;private sector operation;form of subsidies;increase in population;slum upgrading policy;shortage of supply;demand for land;measure of quantity;population growth rate;implementation of reform;deadweight efficiency loss;urban housing stock;Housing Policy;public ownership;income ratio;housing demand;housing finance;urban population;informal settlement;sector work;public-private partnership;property right;urban land;informal sector;housing problem;housing affordability;land supply;land subsidies;housing service;Real estate;factor productivity;housing condition;housing investments;indicator analysis;housing cost;low-income housing;capital use;household survey;land management;household expenditure;secondary city;housing reform;regulatory control;public resource;regulatory environment;service availability;land policy;composite indicator;saving behavior;Labor Market;trend line;targeted subsidy;living condition;land policies;low-income group;foreign remittance;sectoral reform;housing capital;market price;sectoral performance;public control;comparable data;income family;local expert;prices increase;spatial development;rent control;private saving;slum demolition;employment growth;comparative analysis;rural area;beneficial impact;foreign fund;institutional framework;urban upgrade;supply constraint;private developer;municipal budget;qualitative data;connection rate;basic infrastructure;disposable income;composite index;cities alliance;low-income worker;job opportunity;expert opinion;remittance flow;infrastructure service;construction regulation;urban indicators;electricity connection;demographic pressure;output measures;annex annex;real effect;financial effect;Finance Sector;working age;high unemployment;economic refugee;oil producing;inflationary economy;basic housing;bank assistance;important component;housing strategy;real income;public roles;economic model;public production;market performance;market failure;potential borrower;academic study;comparative market;financial incentive;factor inputs;economic efficiency;Borrowing Countries;urban location;housing allowance;low-income population;real sector;urban lending;present study;subsidy system;secondary priority;long-term policies;tax burden;ownership right;subsidized housing;interest subsidy;lack transparency;free access;serviced land;government housing;housing agencies;title system;land market;cumbersome procedures;floor space;outcome measure;solid line;positive relationship;fundamental changes;Socialist economies;financial market;housing shortfalls;unemployment rate;squatter settlement;lower house;capital efficiency;housing price;income household;housing program;land acquisition;tenure system;legal system;community facility;empirical evidence;urban development;severe problems;age population;income growth;household income;high capital;composite measure;cumulative effect;public entity;Demographic Transition;work force;household budget;production level;productivity gain;  See Less -