Section 4 ­ Financial Proposal ­ Standard Forms 1 E2476 V5 Section 5. Terms of Reference for the Preparation of an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. The prospective site of Rogun hydro power plant (HPP) is located about 110 km (by road on M41) ENE of Dushanbe, the capital of Tajikistan. Construction at an existing site was started during Soviet times, thus the proposed location is defined by already existing built assets (esp. underground works) and auxiliary infrastructure, such as office buildings, construction camps and access roads, some of which have deteriorated since construction was halted in the early 1990s. 2. The World Bank has accepted the request of the Government of Republic of Tajikistan (the Government) to finance an assessment of the Completion of the Rogun Hydroelectric Project (HPP), which the Government considers as an important element of the country`s economic development strategy. 3. The Assessment would comprise two complementary parts ­ (i) Technical-Economic and (ii) Environmental-Social including riparian issues and cross border impacts. Consulting services will be rendered by two separate firms for these two parts, while the work is to be carried out in parallel and in an interactive manner. The two sets of Assessment studies would be professionally reviewed on a running basis by two International Independent Panels of Experts (PoE), one for techno-economic and dam safety, the other for environmental/social aspects. 4. The work would include assessment of all the previous work done to date. The most relevant reports/documents that need to be reviewed are: Rogun HEP Technical Project, 1980, by Hydroproject Tashkent, technical projects/documents done in 2008-2009 by design institutes Hydroproject and Moshydrostal. 5. The Government confirms its commitment to comply with the applicable World Bank Safeguards policies in the development of Rogun HPP and the Assessment studies; Social and Environmental Studies would cover these policies comprehensively. Environmental and Social Assessment including involuntary resettlement and land acquisition; riparian issues and dam safety are some of the most intensive assessments that would be undertaken. It is recognized that the Assessment studies would analyze and recommend the possible trade-offs between techno-economic issues and the safeguards: dam safety, environmental, 1|P a g e 2 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference social, resettlement riparian issues. There will be an intensive information flow between the techno-economic Study and the Environmental and Social Studies. In addition a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) will be conducted in a separate assignment to investigate power production scenarios and establish the relative economic, environmental and social performance of identified scenarios, tradeoffs and linkages to other energy sector projects both in country and region. 6. The Assessment studies would consider the design and potential impacts of the Rogun HEP within the context of the entire Vaksh River Development Master Plan (Annex 5), including the Sangtuda 1&2 and Shurob HEPPs. One of the important options that would be assessed is whether it would be optimal to adopt the following sequence: (a) to build the first starting complex of Rogun HEP, (b) then in parallel start construction of the Shurob run-of the river project which is to be located downstream between Rogun and Nurek, and (c) the second stage Rogun HEP to the full originally envisaged height of the dam 335 m. using the cash flows from (a) and (b) above. 2. HISTORY AND STATUS OF PROJECT 7. The original planning, design and construction of Rogun HPP was initiated in the 70ies of the past century. The civil war in 1992 disrupted further development. 8. According to the current conceptual design Rogun would be a reservoir type HEPP with a dam height of about 335 m. The reservoir would have a total storage volume of 13.3 km3 and an active storage volume of about 8.6 km3. It will extend upstream over a distance of about 70 km. The installed capacity will be 6x600 MW (totaling 3.6 GW). 9. The selected dam location is in a narrow gorge with steep flanks, which would allow minimal material demand for dam construction. The site geology is complex, being characterized by highly heterogeneous sedimentary layers (in terms of strength and permeability) including haline, soluble strata that necessitate careful investigation and analysis. The facility`s design life is estimated to be 150-200 years. 10. Construction works were started in the early 1980s but had substantively stopped by 1992, but beginning 2006 there are significant resources allocated from the State Budget to continue with the restoration works as this project. Currently most of the site preparation works as well as about 70% of the underground works (access tunnels, penstocks, diversion and outlet tunnels, chambers for turbines / generators and transformers) have been completed. 11. A key safeguards issue is the resettlement of 63 villages with at least 30,000 residents from the reservoir area. Resettlement commenced at the end of the 1980s and part of the reservoir area`s residents have already moved to new housing provided by the project developer in the cities of Rogun, Obigarm and other parts of Tajikistan. Known physical cultural resources include sacred sites, graveyards and burial sites. While no sites of major archeological and historical importance have been reported it should be anticipated 3 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference that the project area contains some sites to be identified, documented and secured on the basis of a field survey by qualified specialists. Resettlement needs to be viewed from a comprehensive livelihoods restoration and development perspective. 12. Environmental due diligence during project preparation has started with several volumes of environmental studies in the original first design commenced at the end of the 80s of the past century. They focused on the HPP`s environmental impact on the downstream river system, local flora and fauna, local microclimate, population, and the environmental quality of the reservoir area. Planning for involuntary resettlement was prepared and resettlement partially implemented at the end of the 80s of the past century. 3. OBJECTIVE OF THE CONSULTANT'S SERVICES 13. The Consultants shall prepare and present to the Borrower / Project Sponsor an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) including all necessary additional documentation which may be required to satisfy specific World Bank safeguard policies which may be triggered by the planned project activities. Under the ESIA process a socio-economic monitoring framework, resettlement policy framework (RPF) to cover the entire project area (including resettlement audit) and resettlement action plan (RAPs)1 for the initially affected villages would be prepared to manage involuntary resettlement, land acquisition and losses of property and livelihoods, as well as an environmental management plan (EMP) covering both local and riparian impacts and risks. 14. The ESIA and related environmental management plan (EMP), resettlement policy framework (RPF), as well as the resettlement action plans (RAPs) shall be prepared in a level of detail specific enough for incorporation into a tender package for potential construction works, to allow these activities to be adequately priced and become part of the successful bidder`s works contract. The ultimate aim is to foster on the ground implementation of effective measures during the project execution and operational phases. 15. The Consultant shall be independent, hired on a competitive basis and will not be connected to the Designer of the project, or the Contractor, or any other entity assuming a role which a role which might cause a conflict of interest situation. 4. SCOPE OF WORK OF THE CONSULTANT 4.1 General: 16. The Consultants services will relate to the Rogun HPP project, as a very large scale reservoir type HPP with a significant amount of related safeguards work to be accomplished; the Environmental and Social Impact assessment (ESIA) will address the environmental, socio-economic and cultural situation at the project site, identify potential impacts, including the cumulative impact of the entire Vakhsh river cascade on the relevant areas of Tajikistan and all the riparian states. 1 The primary RAP will be prepared for the planned Stage 1 of Rogun HPP, which would include a dam height of crest at 1,060 m asl and a correspondingly much smaller reservoir thereby affecting only a small number of the total villages. Should the full project be decided feasible and implementation proceed, a full RAP covering the entire project area impacted by a 335 m high dam would be produced under a separate consultancy) 4 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 17. The Consultant will design appropriate measures to avoid, mitigate, offset or compensate such impacts where possible and provide instruments for their implementation in form of environmental and social management and monitoring plans. This study includes all necessary assessments relating to potentially triggered safeguard policies. 18. The Consultant shall be responsible for carrying out all necessary preparatory studies, field work, research and investigations (including the generation of new field data, as deemed necessary or appropriate) to compile the information required for the work. This includes the preparation of designs and tender documents for investigation services and the award of subcontracts and the monitoring of performance and outcome of sub- contracted activities, if any. 4.2 Environmental and Social Assessment 19. The Consultant shall assess the environmental and social impacts in accordance with Tajik environmental laws and regulations, with international good practice, as well as the World Bank Safeguard Policies (available on the World Bank`s external web site in English, Russian and Farsi languages). These may be supplemented by similar policies and practices required by other International Financing Institutions (IFIs) and Export Credit Agencies (ECAs) and under the Equator Principles for private sector investors. Annex 1 provides an overview over the World Bank`s safeguard policies and the commonly required related documents. 20. During the initial phase of the environmental and social assessment the Consultant will ­ in consultation with Client and World Bank - confirm which Safeguard Policies are triggered and include the appropriate documentation into the deliverables. 4.2.1 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) 21. In the initial stages of the environmental assessment process a strategic environmental assessment (SEA) will be prepared under a separate consultancies, which will include strategic environmental considerations for potential alternative power production scenarios. This SEA will contribute to shaping Tajikistan`s overall energy development outcomes by integrating environmental and social considerations in the country`s energy policy and sector growth. It will also analyze relevant components within the Tajik energy sector in their relationship with transnational energy trading and development schemes. It will build upon the World Bank`s Country Environmental Analysis (CEA) Similar studies by Asian Development Bank (ADB) and OECD should also be considered. 22. Specifically the SEA will analyze, from the environmental and social points of view, Tajikistan`s energy policy, the current planning for energy sector, the role of the Vaksh River Development Master Plan and currently developed transmission projects in the energy policy and long term planning, and the government`s schemes on energy sources other than hydropower (e.g. coal fired TPP, renewable energy) and energy conservation. The SEA will obtain the results of the load forecast scenarios, export demand data and the related least cost generation development alternatives produced by the Consultants and carefully analyze related economic, environmental, social implications of the existing 5 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference and proposed generation alternatives and their interactions with other sectors such as transport, infrastructure or mining, as well as the Central Asia energy sector. Strategic issues relevant to the Vakhsh cascade will be carried over from the SEA to the ESIA. 23. The Consultant will review the SEA once it is available as draft document and peruse its main findings for the further development of the ESIA. In this context the Consultant will also familiarize himself with a planned major transmission line project (CASA 1000) which would entail the creation of several major energy transmission corridors designed to export (hydropower) energy produced in Tajikistan to neighboring and regional countries, among them Afghanistan and Pakistan. This project is being prepared with IFI financing as well, notably IsDB and WBG and the Consultant will be aware of the activities and outputs of these studies and, whenever warranted useful, refer to results and findings in the Rogun Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) and notably the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA). 24. Studies and investigations including preliminary environmental and social assessments as well as a techno-economic feasibility study of the CASA 1000 line were concluded, some time back. Update of these assessments are under way. 4.2.2 Initial Environmental Screening and Social Screening 25. The purpose of an initial screening of the current environmental and social situation is to gain an overall understanding of the local baseline situation and riparian issues, and the project`s current and potential future social and environmental impacts and provide an overview of the range and depth of issues to be subsequently studied in detail under the main ESIA. This overview will set the focus for further studies, data collection or other resources that will be required for the conduct of the ESIA. 26. The proposed project is based on the completion of a dam at the Rogun site and the already existing, about 70% complete underground works. Thus the Consultant will have to review the previous studies carried out at different project phases during the original assessment/design, and investigate /summarize what in terms of environmental /social due diligence has been done in the past, present situation and which future actions are planned. The approach to ESIA of Rogun HEP will therefore be dependent on the present physical conditions and state of past studies/assessments. 27. The Consultant will list, rank and explain the major identified environmental and social issues for the project, assess if they have been dealt with adequately in the past project phases (both process-wise and from actual, practical handling on site) and which issues might constitute risks for the further course of the project. 28. The Consultant shall carry out an integrated, initial environmental and social impact assessment in accordance with Tajik requirements and the operational policies of the World Bank2. The Consultant will initiate this initial assessment at the start of the 2 See Operational Policy 4.01, Environmental Assessment and the Environmental Assessment Sourcebook, Volume II, Sectoral Guidelines, Environmental Department, World Bank, and Technical Paper No. 140, dealing with dams and reservoirs. 6 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference engineering studies and work parallel to the Techno-Economic Assessment Study (TEAS) Consultant. The screening report will be submitted during Phase 2 of the TEAS, taking into account the assessment of the existing situation at Roghun (as produced in Phase 1 of the TEAS) and providing input to the project definition of Phase 2. 29. The initial task of the initial assessment and screening is a review of the existing documentation that is relevant to environmental impact of the proposed Rogun HEPP, and to identify where there are (i) gaps, (ii) deficient or contradictory issues, or (iii) issues to be updated. Also, the Tajik legal and institutional framework on land acquisition, compensation and resettlement will be reviewed and compared with World Bank safeguard requirements, and gaps and deviations will be identified. In doing so, not only relevant official law but also good practice related to resettlement will be assessed for incorporation into any future investment project. 30. A preliminary stakeholder analysis will be conducted, indicating possible specialized interests and conflicts. The consultant will meet with representatives of the key stakeholders to review the findings of the preliminary assessment and receive feedback on any issues they feel are missing. Based on this stakeholder assessment, the Consultant will recommend the main channels and issues that are needed to engage in effective communication with these groups. 31. The report prepared during this initial assessment will Review and recognize past environmental/social performance and liabilities/risks (see section above) Elaborate a preliminary inventory of environmental and social impacts of the existing engineering project and alternatives (if more than one), regarding to dam height, dam type, reservoir operations regime and reservoir filling, and include any identified related structures or investments, such as access and construction roads and infrastructure, housing, storage facilities, accessory construction and transmission lines. 32. A field based audit of the impacts and consequences of the construction activities already carried out during the Soviet period and continued by the Tajik Government up to present (i.e. ongoing resettlement), is to be carried out and the findings systematically recorded. This audit will examine the current resettlement program, document its policy guidelines, entitlement matrix and other provisions (see text on resettlement audit in later section). 33. In this initial phase all possible safeguards related impacts shall be identified and quantified as far as possible, albeit for some costs in terms of order of magnitude, for inclusion in the project cost estimate. The long term and irreversible impacts and those which cannot be mitigated shall be identified and analyzed as a priority. 34. The environmental screening will encompass direct and indirect impacts of the project. The scope of the screening will extend beyond the project site to upstream and downstream impacts. Impacts of changes in water regulation will be screened for both ecological and ecosystem services impacts (including social impacts as noted below). 7 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 35. The social screening will review land policy, land cadastre and other official documents, verify the population census, take stock of the land use in a screening manner (yielding main types and percentages on a community scale), discuss with local authorities and community leaders the likely scale of resettlement and socioeconomic impacts for both communities to be resettled and other communities potentially impacted by the project including host communities in areas to which resettled populations might move. Also, Tajik law on permitting and the role of the Ministry of Energy and Industries / Environment as well as on land acquisition and resettlement will be reviewed and compared with World Bank safeguard requirements. Any significant deviations and gaps should be identified. The reality of and experience with resettlement in Tajikistan should also be assessed, so any good practice not mentioned in the law might be actively utilized and poor practice identified and avoided in the project. 36. The IESS will also take into account the already completed and ongoing resettlement activities under the auspices of the Government of Tajikistan. This will include a detailed review of the legal background, existing procedures and instruments, the current status, ongoing activities and existing planning for the further course of the project. 37. Attention will be given by the Consultant to physical cultural property issues, such as any cultural, religious, historical or archaeological sites, including sacred sites, graveyards and burial places, that might be flooded or affected by the construction of the dam, reservoir impoundment, quarries, construction camps and access / haulage roads. A field based survey will be conducted by qualified cultural resources staff to identify potential impacts and mitigation measures. Provisions will be made for the use of chance find procedures if unanticipated archeological, historical and sacred sites or materials are encountered during further construction. 38. The social screening should be done to provide an understanding of the socio- economic profile of the affected communities to enable the project to design activities to meet their development needs and mitigate against potential negative impacts. See Annex 4 for detailed guidance on issues to be considered when conducting social analysis for this project. 39. During the social screening, consultation with the Project-Affected People (PAPs) should focus on basic information about the project. Details on such topics as resettlement packages would be deferred until the policies and procedures for resettlement are defined. The consultants should clearly tell PAPs that they are just conducting studies and that issues raised during interviews and group discussions cannot be viewed as agreed policies or decisions in the project. Key among other information that should be disseminated at this stage is the nature and scope of the current studies and the possible future project, cutoff dates (after agreement on the same with project authorities) and grievance mechanisms to be used during the project. The opportunities for further feedback and participation in conjunction with preparation of the RAP will also be communicated. An outreach strategy for the resettlement plan is to be prepared as part of the RAP. 40. The preliminary assessment shall be completed and the report shall be prepared and submitted at the conclusion of the pre-feasibility phase. Terms of Reference for the 8 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference follow-on EIA, RPF and RAPs will be reviewed and can be adjusted depending on the outcomes of this phase. 4.2.3 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) 41. The ESIA will be developed for Rogun HEPP and shall contain a detailed identification of the base-line situation, of expected impacts of the proposed project, and provide an Environmental Management Plan (a proposal for content and structure of the EMP can be found in Annex C to the World Bank`s Operations Policy 4.01, Environmental Assessment, available on the World Bank`s external web site, and a summary further below in this section). The EMP shall include both a Mitigation Plan and a Monitoring Plan (see Annex 2). 42. Activities for both environmental and social aspects shall run in parallel and be synchronized with progress of the techno-economic study, with particular reference to integration of water management and environmental/social measures that may affect design and/or project economics. 43. The ESIA will build on results from the screening environmental and social assessments, but the level of detail shall be higher. The ESIA addresses the physical, biological and meteorological consequences of the flooding of the reservoir area as well as the impact on population centers and cultural properties. This includes the impact on the topography that might induce natural disasters, including landslides or flooding. It will address the impact of any transmission system expansion or rehabilitation, e. g. transmission lines connecting Rogun HEPP to the CASA 1000 project, as well as the impact of construction activities and waste / spoils disposal. The ESIA will examine issues related to water regulation and impacts on existing flow regimes both at the project site and downstream through riparian countries. Such impacts will include both ecological and social/economic (e.g., agriculture). 44. A detailed risk analysis will be conducted in close cooperation with the TEAS and should include geological and seismic hazards, especially a detailed analysis for induced seismicity, which in studies performed during Soviet period, have been found to be a potentially significant risk. If issues of relevance are identified, they shall be communicated to the TEAS Consultant to be included into the technical risk management plan.3 The context of landslides in the reservoir area and induced seismicity should also be explored under this topic. 45. Boxes 1 to 5 summarize key environmental topics for the assessment as identified by previous studies, during joint field missions by representatives from the Government, Barki Tojik and World Bank specialists, and known to be general issues of concern 3 For risk analysis covered in the technical studies, the Consultant shall receive the relevant information from the TEAS consultants commissioned for these studies. In the TOR for the technical studies (TEAS TOR) this topic is be explicitly stated, that risks associated with the construction of Rogun HPP, risks associated with the operation of Rogun and the combined operation of Rogun and other HPPs of the cascade must be identified. For each risk its impact must be assessed and means to mitigate it or eliminate it designed. 9 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference within large hydropower projects. These topics will be updated based on the Consultants` screening and SEA: Boxes 1-5: Key environmental tasks and actions identified for Rogun HEPP: Box 1: Review of existing data / studies Needs to be a major compilation and inventory campaign Work with Bark Tajik to view archives and draw list of existing studies and data pools Copy and physically assemble all materials at a place freely accessible to all authorized project participants Organize staff to manage and supervise data pool Review data using sufficient number of Russian speaking, qualified engineers and specialists, translate key technical and safeguards documents into English language Identify data gaps and areas not covered by appropriate studies, using good international practice and World Bank requirements as benchmarks Review existing studies and materials (including but not limited documents in Annex 7 of these ToRs), and follow up with study authors, as appropriate. Elaborate a comprehensive data review report, which contains List / inventory of available information Contents and abstracts of all key reports in Russian and English languages; list of documents available in English in full version Identification of major data gaps and proposed action to close them, including time and cost estimates 10 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference Box 2: Review of geological conditions at dam site and reservoir area Review investigation history, including campaigns, types, volume, quality of site investigations (SI); assess completeness, quality, availability and usability of generated data Review geological / geotechnical reports and resulting models against adequacy in context of good international practice Identify and comment on special problems such as: Landslides/ rockfalls along reservoir slopes, that can cause hazards to settlements and infrastructure, or can create natural dams and generate flood waves or peak floods when such dams break. Review existing geotechnical hazard maps for the reservoir area and assess their accuracy and actuality by sufficient field checks, assess adequacy for project purposes and identify gaps and measures to close them. Review issue of seismic dam engineering and induced seismicity from Rogun reservoir, provide recommendations for further investigations, if deemed necessary Identify major gaps in geological / geotechnical model and propose the necessary actions to close them. Review and discuss any proposed supplementary site investigation program with project proponents, engineering Consultants and POE Note: All geological, geotechnical, geochemical and seismic investigations and technical reviews will be done by the TEAS Consultants. The results obtained from them need to be reviewed by the ESIA consultants from the environmental, social and safety points of view in an interactive manner. Box 3: Workplace health and safety, hazards to site personnel and population Review current conditions of existing built assets, especially underground works regarding structural stability, potential spalling and rock fall risks, unsecured shafts and caverns Review current site conditions regarding safety of electrical installations, lighting, signposting, emergency equipment and communication systems, fire safety, first aid equipment and rescue services. Review status of use of personal protection equipment for surface and underground works Review current site health and safety management procedures and staffing Draw up recommendations to improve H&S conditions on construction site, elaborate comprehensive H&S plan Develop site inspection, monitoring and enforcement procedures for H&S measures 11 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference Box 4: Site preparation, cleanup and waste management Currently the construction site is characterized by certain quantities of left over scrap metal, derelict machinery, construction materials and waste Conduct site survey to prepare an inventory of above materials, including quantities, assessment of properties such as environmental hazards, usability for new construction works, recyclability, waste categories and disposal pathways and costs Elaborate site cleanup and waste management plan, which at later project preparation / implementation stages can be expanded as component of the EMP Box 5: Land management: soil conservation, erosion control, hazard management and biodiversity Due to the combination of past construction activities, the sudden drastic reduction of the level of construction works and the 15+ year period of limited activity, the project area has been visibly impacted by strong erosion, slope instability, mass movements such as landslides and rock falls, and a deteriorated vegetation cover aggravating and accelerating soil depletion Conduct construction site mapping to identify and localize areas impacted by erosion, mass movements and instabilities; classify according to hazard / risk levels for existing built assets and future project components Produce hazard related maps for dam area and planned site installations such as roads, camps, storage areas, machinery pads, workshops etc., which indicate high risk areas and can be used as planning tool for remediation and mitigation works The maps should be compatible in format and contents with geotechnical hazard maps to be prepared for the entire reservoir area Produce a biodiversity inventory for the entire affected project area, including reservoir and dam sites, appurtenant structures, temporary works, areas of indirect impacts and potential reservoir influence (e.g. by microclimate change). The surveys should address terrestrial and aquatic compartments, the latter selected key areas and "hot spots" of the downstream area where hydrological changes are expected to have most impact. Biodiversity data should be geo-referenced and maps be prepared for the entire relevant investigation area. The Consultant should assess feasibility and options for protection or rescue/recovery of any rare/endangered species or ecological communities which may be identified through the biodiversity inventory, and the cost of such actions. Total biomass in the reservoir area should be estimated and an assessment made whether it will be necessary to remove vegetation prior to filling the reservoir (if so, at which cost) 12 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 46. Box 6 summarizes the general environmental issues commonly associated with HPPs, all of which will apply to Rogun in varying degrees. These issues will have to be considered with respect to the relevant areas in Tajikistan as well as in all countries forming part of the Amu Darya basin. Box 6: List of potential adverse environmental Description of the potential impact of the hydropower plant needs to consider the whole range of reservoir and river basin management issues, including water flow- through, including but not limited to: key environmental performance indices, eg.: surface area vs. megawatt production capacity (ha/MW), water retention time (days), biomass flooded (m3), length of river impounded / left dry, useful reservoir life (years), persons requiring resettlement vs. megawatt production capacity (no. persons/MW), area of critical natural habitats affected (ha) ecological effects of flooding and construction activities, including risks to habitats and topographical impacts that would induce landslides or flooding effect on the hydrology and on the water quality of the river/reservoir impact of the changed river flow regime, including impact due to river impounding upstream of the dam, and changes in volume, pattern and quality of water downstream of the dam determination of ecological flow between dam and tailrace discharge effect of river animal and aquatic lives and potential for maintaining them likelihood of reservoir stratification, biomass flooding potential foliage and vegetation in area to be flooded and removal requirements before flooding impact on drinking water supply systems sedimentation of the reservoir potential for reservoir landslides and soil erosion possible loss of cultural property (including archaeological and historical sites), including a site survey and provision for chance finds potential impact from short-term or long-term migration to the project area or such induced activities as logging potential for incidence of water borne and water related diseases impact on fisheries, agriculture and other sources of income Impact on downstream irrigation-based agricultural systems and drinking water supply, both during reservoir filling phase and routine operation 13 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 47. Box 7 identifies the key elements of the impact assessment on riparian countries of the construction and operation of Rogun HPP. (see Box 7). Box 7: Impact Assessment on Riparian countries of Rogun HPP After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1990-91, the newly independent Republics continued to hold the flow targets prescribed in Soviet Union Decree 1110 as agreed and valid. By an agreement dated February 18, 1992, the five Central Asian Riparians (CARs) agreed to maintain and adhere to the division of trans-boundary water resources as set out in Protocol # 566 (Amu Darya basin). Later on in 1995, heads of the States of Central Asia signed the effective Nukus Declaration which is the basic document regulating water sharing issues and is the basis for assessment of riparian impacts. The consultant will assess the impacts of the construction and operation of Rogun HPP on the downstream countries. The specific assessment should be done in concert with the consultants conducting the Techno-Economic Assessment Study (TEAS), who would be responsible for proposing any technical and economic solutions. The consultant should: a) Compile data relating to the area of lands irrigated by Amu Darya waters Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan since independence regarding, crops grown, water usage per hectare, yields, agronomic and irrigation practices. b) Compile data on number of communities using Amu Darya for domestic and industrial water supply and the related water demand and whether the proposed operating regime of Rogun/Nurek could in any way improve or worsen their current situation 14 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference Box 7: (continued) c) Review the flows into Aral Sea since independence and broadly identify the key causes for Aral Sea's decline and the inability to achieve the targets specified in Soviet Decree 1110 for Aral Sea restoration. d) Analyze the impact of the proposed Rogun operating regime and check whether it is directly or indirectly relevant to the issue of Aral Sea restoration. If yes, indicate how change to the operating regime can help e) Analyze whether Rogun HPP by its construction and operation has the potential to stop the flow of Amu Darya water to downstream countries ­ either wholly or partly; or during the vegetation season; or has the potential to change the seasonality of Amu Darya flow to downstream countries. f) Analyze environmental and social impacts of various reservoir simulations, including those undertaken in the TEAS, for both reservoir filling and operation g) If the potential exists, working closely with the TEAS consultants, identify the mitigation measures ­ technical, operational, financial institutional, legal ­ that could be implemented to ensure no significant harm is caused to the riparian countries. h) Review the environmental flow needs in Amu Darya River and verify whether the minimum needs are met under the present arrangements and whether Rogun could in any way improve this on account of its high storage capacity. Note: The Memorandum of Understanding on Energy Development for Sustainable Growth between the Government of Tajikistan and the World Bank regarding cooperation agreed between the Government of Tajikistan and the World Bank, (Item 2) includes: - Initiating and advancing the technical-economic, the environmental and social impact assessments for the Rogun Hydropower Project (HPP) with due regard to international standards of environmental and social standards, as well as compliance with applicable operational policies of the World Bank, including dam safety, environmental impact assessment, resettlement, and issues related to downstream countries. 15 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 48. The World Bank has organized independent and objective consultations with all affected riparian countries. A detailed record of the issues raised by the riparians is included as in Annex 6. 49. Box 8 addresses the recommended investigations relating to implications of climate change scenarios on the project as well as the project`s potential impacts on downstream ecosystems and the socio-economic framework. 50. Also the ESIA should address issues connected to climate change and climate variations, investigating matters such as glacial melting, changes in flow regime (volumes, seasonal variation), sediment transport and re-sedimentation. Potential scenarios and their impact on operation should be outlined and considered (see Box 8). 16 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference Box 8: Hydrology and Climate Change Impacts The impacts of Rogun HEP construction and operation should be seen within the context of global climate change, which might significantly affect the physical environment of the project. The Consultant should describe and whenever possible quantify processes and factors such as: temperature impact change on water balance models of mountainous regions, on glacial melting, water generation from fossil ice vs. annual replenishment by precipitation, water storage in glacial systems, timescale of balance of deposition and depletion changes in amount, type and seasonal/annual distribution of precipitation in the project area and the upstream / downstream watershed of Rogun HPP changes in reservoir temperature and resulting stratification / mixing behavior due to change of average ambient temperature as well as water temperature of Vaksh river and other direct inflows, impacts on reservoir water chemistry, fauna and flora changes of upstream / downstream hydrological parameters, notably flow rates and sedimentary load and their seasonal / annual distribution. They might be controlled by underlying phenomena such as glacial melting and subsequent release of water / sediment trapped in ice, glacial retreat and exposition of additional areas to erosion, changes in vegetation and resulting impact on erosion / sediment generation and microclimate changes in seasonal / annual demand patterns for water and electricity: shifts in peak demands for energy (heating / cooling) and water (agriculture, irrigation) in the annual cycle, and interaction of these changes with operational requirements and hydrological parameters, such as seasonal flow rates; Review the data on the past climate change in each of the countries in the region and all available future climate change forecasts and assess their impact (a) on the water demand in each country and (b) on the design and operation of Rogun; Review the Carbon dioxide emission data in all the five countries and analyze the extent to which Rogun could help to reduce them and outline possible carbon financing mechanisms. The Consultant is not expected to deliver detailed, quantitative studies on the listed topics, but will analyze them in a comprehensive, qualitative manner, procure quantitative data where available (e.g. from existing global climate models - GCMs) and supplement own best estimates whenever reasonably possible. The Consultant will analyze existing conflicts due to competition among different water uses and develop scenarios how such conflicts would be affected by likely climate change scenarios. The Consultant will not be required to conduct own basic research, but use available scientific and technical publications and reports. 17 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 51. A proposed structure for the ESIA is outlined below: Executive Summary and Conclusions Policy, Legal and Administrative Framework - Discuss the policy, legal and administrative framework and requirements (e.g. Government of Tajikistan, World Bank, relevant international environmental agreements, etc). Project Description ­ describe the proposed project and include the following information as relevant: location; general layout; size, capacity, etc; pre- construction activities; project / construction history, construction activities; schedule, staffing and support; facilities and services; operations; required off-site investments; and life span. Note: this is not an exhaustive list. Baseline Data ­ assemble, evaluate and present baseline data on the relevant environmental characteristics of the study area including the physical, biological, cultural property and socio-economic conditions. Any changes anticipated before the project commences should also be identified. Environmental Impacts ­ determine and quantify where possible the significant positive and negative impacts, direct and indirect impacts, and immediate and long term impacts associated with the project. Impacts will include both local and downstream, including impacts on riparians countries. Identify those that are unavoidable or irreversible. Identify mitigation measures and explore opportunities for environmental enhancement. Characterize the extent and quality of available data (see Boxes 1-7 for identified and general issues associated with Rogun HPP, which need to be checked / addressed by the Consultant). Analysis of Alternatives ­ Making use of the outputs from the TEAS and the SEA, systematically compare feasible alternatives to: (a) the proposed project as an investment to provide energy and water regulation, (b) the project with the already-built assets, (c) technology, design, construction techniques, (d) sites for access roads, construction camps, quarry sites and other associated works (e) phasing and operation. As for Rogun the location is predetermined by existing works, variations in dam height / resulting reservoir size, as well as the without project` scenario should be assessed. The comparative analysis should address (and quantify where possible): the environmental impacts; the feasibility of impact mitigation; capital and recurrent costs; the suitability of options under local conditions; related institutional, training and monitoring requirements. State the basis for selecting the proposed design, including the minimization of risk. Environmental Management Plan ­The objective of the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is to provide a practical tool to mitigate negative impacts and enhance positive impacts resulting from the investment project. The EMP includes both a Mitigation Plan and Monitoring Plan. Sample tables for format, structure and content are provided in Annex 2. The EMP is a key outcome of the Environmental Impact Assessment and the backbone for environmental safeguards implementation and management during physical project implementation. It generally covers the following information: 18 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference (a) Introduction/Responsible Party: Link to the specific project and identify the authors who prepared the EMP along with the date of preparation. (b) Project Description: brief summary description of the project, including nature of the investment, location of the project, baseline situation/geographic description, and any characteristics of the area that are of particular interest (e.g. near a protected area, area of cultural or historical interest). Also this should include a description of the socio-economic conditions in the area and illustrative maps and drawings. (c) Project Impact: Identify the expected short-term and long-term impacts of the project during the design, construction, and operation phases. If these can be quantified, this should be included. (d) Mitigation Plan: Include a description of the steps to be taken to mitigate the major potential impacts on land, water, air, ecosystem services and other aspects of the environment during the construction and operation phases. The mitigation plan should be keyed to the impacts identified in the previous section. Particular attention should be paid to the specification of emission limits, environmental norms, water management and regulation, and design standards with specific reference to Tajik laws and any other relevant guidelines such as the World Bank Group Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines (EHS), in particular the General EHS Guideline, (2007), or other relevant international norms. The Mitigation Plan should parallel the risk from impacts identified in (c) above. For example, to minimize the emission of greenhouse gases from flooding, contractors should remove foliage in the flood plain in advance of the flooding stage. (e) Monitoring Plan: Include a description of the key parameters to be monitored (including monitoring locations, schedules and responsible entities) to ensure that the construction and operation of the project is in conformance with Tajik law, other relevant norms and standards, operating commitments and transboundary agreements. Again, the Monitoring Plan should parallel the structure and issues included in the Environmental Management and Mitigation Plan. If permits or construction or monitoring contracts cover such details, these can be referenced as attachments. The development of this plan will require consultation with responsible agencies for EMP monitoring such as the Ministry of Environment. (f) Institutional Arrangements: There should be a narrative discussion that provide a brief presentation on how the monitoring data is going to be used for sound environmental performance and water management - who collects the data, who analyzes it, who prepares reports, who are the reports sent to and how often, what is done by the responsible authorities after they receive the information; how decisions are taken, responses generated and enforced, regarding non-compliance with the EMP. Particular discussion needs to be given to the role of the Ministry of Environment and other ministries and agencies that may play a monitoring role, as well as transboundary organizations such as the ICWC. 19 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference (g) Training requirements and costs: Training opportunities should be organized for technical and management staff from relevant Tajik authorities and institutions (environmental, land management, geological / geophysical / meteorological / hydrological surveys and institutes), to create / raise awareness of international best practice in safeguards issues, close technical knowledge gaps and enhance staff skills and experience. The Consultant should develop specific plans and schedules stating the groups / persons to be trained, contents, timeframe, venues, trainers and the cost such as venues, travel, per diem, fees / remuneration for lecturers / trainers. Instrumentation and Monitoring Plan: Drawing upon the work of the TEAS Consultants this consultancy will update and supplement be the plan for monitoring and recording of the behavior of the Rogun dam and related hydro- meteorological, structural and seismic factors with environmentally relevant data such as water quality, and downstream discharge and availability and ensure that the quality and frequency of data recording corresponds to the requirements of ensuring good environmental performance of the HPP and avoiding of any negative downstream impacts, especially in transboundary context. Emergency Preparedness Plan, including the protection of people, property and heritage and national treasures (located downstream in the riparian states) in the event of Rogun dam failure, as well as a coordinated early warning system and a communication plan. This plan shall be prepared as envisaged in Annex A to BP 4.37 (Dam Safety) of the Operational Policies of the World Bank. Execution of part of these services in phases II and III assigned to the consultant for TEAS under another task and consultant has to perform these services, taking into account the data obtained from TEAS. Appendices (a) Consultations with affected groups and non-governmental organizations. The following should be included: (i) date(s) of consultation(s); (ii) location of consultation(s); (iii) names and addresses of attendees (as appropriate); (iv) meeting program/schedule: (v) what is to be presented and by whom; (vi) summary Meeting Minutes (Comments, questions and responses by presenters); (vii) agreed actions. Since the investment project would be a Category A, specific public consultations are to include (i) an initial consultation in relation to the planned work and then (ii) a second consultation in terms of the findings. (b) Sample contract terms and positions for the bill of quantities (BoQ) for contractors to mitigate short-term impacts from construction and decommissioning plan for significantly sized temporary works, such as access and haulage roads, borrow areas, quarries, and construction camps. 4.3 Information Disclosure and Consultations of the Public 52. A public consultation and disclosure campaign as required by OP 4.01 and OP4.12 will be prepared, organized and carried out. For a project of Rogun`s size and complexity at least 2 rounds of consultations will have to be carried out: One round before 20 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference commissioning of the ESIA, on the TOR and the planned safeguards approach. These will be carried out independently by a third party and are not part of these TOR. The second round (or series) will be held on draft environmental and social documents to integrate stakeholder concerns into the final versions and especially the derivative environmental and social management plans. 53. The Consultant will assemble appropriate materials, (maps, graphs, drawings, simulations, models, key environmental figures) disclose them in a manner acceptable to Bank policies (timely prior to consultation, in a form and language that are understandable, in locations accessible with reasonable effort to the groups being consulted) and organize venues which will enable the affected population to participate without excessive undue efforts. Suggested venues would be near the construction site and in the reservoir area, ensuring accessibility to all affected people, i.e., with a spacing allowing for a travel distance of not more than 20 km for any participants. The initial consultations on the ESIA TOR will be organized in the same manner as described above after publication on appropriate websites (Barki Tojik, Ministry for Energy) and invitation of affected local population, relevant NGOs and other appropriate parties. 54. The materials and information to be disclosed will have to cover the following aspects of the project: (i) General project design and layout, emphasizing areas directly impacted by permanent or temporary works and structures, access and service roads, and areas indirectly impacted by construction or operation (noise, dust, borrow pits, landscape aesthetics etc.), areas impacted by reservoir filling and downstream hydrological changes; (ii) summary of all major direct and indirect environmental and socio-economic impacts generally associated with large scale hydropower, (iii) overview of relevant World Bank environmental and social safeguards policies applicable to the project (OP4.01, OP4.12) and the approaches and instruments for mitigation of environmental and social impacts, which are commonly applied in hydropower projects; (iv) overview of TOR for the ESIA and RAP for the project. 55. The Consultant will ensure the presence, at the consultations, of competent technical staff highly familiar with the project. Discussions will be conducted in language(s) understandable to all affected stakeholders. With assistance of the project proponent materials, will be prepared clearly describing the project in a manner understandable for non-specialists and conduct the presentation(s). These can be maps, pictures, plans, diagrams and other information materials which are understandable to a non-technical audience, yet truly and fully characterize the project, the expected impacts and planned mitigation measures. The Consultant will provide documentation of the following: Manner in which notification of the consultation was announced: media(s) used, date(s), description or copy of the announcement Date(s) consultation(s) was (were) held Location(s) consultation(s) was (were) held Who was invited (Name, Organization or Occupation, Telephone/Fax/e- mail number/address (home and/or office) Who attended (Name, Organization or Occupation, Telephone/Fax/e-mail number/address (home and/or office) Meeting Program/Schedule (What is to be presented and by whom) 21 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference Summary Meeting Minutes (Comments, Questions and Response by Presenters) List of decisions reached, and any actions agreed upon with schedules, deadlines and responsibilities. 4.4 Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for Socio-economic Impacts, Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF), Resettlement Audit and Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) The resettlement assessment and action plans will proceed in two parts: (i) scope of work detailed below; and (ii) completion of full Resettlement Action Plan for remaining people potentially affected by the full project. This ToRs calls for the specification of methodology, work and budget for the first part only. The second part may be exercised subject to the findings of the assessments, the opinions of the Panels of Experts, and funding. The specific tasks for this phase will be determined after completion of Phase III of the TEAS and the ESIA. Part 2 is also subject to World Bank funding and no objections on contract extension. The Consultant is not required to provide methodology nor cost estimate for Part 2 in their proposal. Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for Socio-economic Impacts: 56. The socio-economic studies described in the social screening section, and detailed in Annex 4 will inform the development of a socio-economic baseline which will serve as a framework to evaluate and analyze project impacts (negative impacts and benefits) on the wide range of stakeholders (beyond just those directly resettled by the project). The detailed profile of the groups impacted by the project, their livelihoods, social networks, communication channels, institutional and political set up as described in the section on social screening will be summarized and presented as a baseline profile of the communities affected by the project. 57. Based on the above, a monitoring and evaluation framework will be developed. This will include a set of clear, measurable indicators to analyze the impact that the project will have on the communities. The indicators will differ over the project cycle (short and long term) as well as for different groups (impacts on resettlers different from hosts etc.). The framework will also indicate the time-frame where the indicator is relevant, the methodology to collect information for the indicator, the primary informants and the relative weight of the indicator. This framework will have a heavy focus on qualitative methods and indicators to contextualize quantitative data, thereby reflecting the mix of methods recommended for use in the collection of baseline data (see above). There should be clarity on the institutional responsibilities for M & E with a balanced use of Government and civil society represented in the responsibility matrix. 58. The Consultants should also refer to the Social Assessment Policies and Guidelines (GP 10.05) and the Social Analysis Sourcebook (2003) of the World Bank for methodological guidance and social assessment tools. Resettlement Policy Framework 22 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 59. The World Bank`s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement (OP 4.12) requires that either a Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) or a Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) be prepared when project activities displace people from land or productive resources, and which result in the loss of shelter, the loss of assets or access to assets, and the loss of income sources or means of livelihood whether or not the affected persons must move to another location. The objectives of the policy are to avoid or minimize adverse impacts, to give displaced people opportunities to participate in the design and implementation of resettlement programs, and to assist displaced people in their efforts to improve their livelihoods and standards of living, or at least to restore these to pre-project levels. Key elements and structure of a RPF and RAP are detailed in Annex A of the World Bank`s Operational Policy OP 4.12. 60. A RPF will be developed to cover the whole submergence area, and including households who may resettle as well as those who may not resettle but are affected through loss of access to resources or services. The aim of the RPF is to serve as a framework detailing the following areas: i. Legal Framework. Identification of the principles and guidelines which will be used to acquire lands or other assets from private ownership, as well as to resume public lands from authorized and unauthorized private uses. A review of current policies and procedures in Tajikistan relating to land acquisition and the World Bank`s resettlement policy to identify any gap between local laws and the Bank`s policy, and the mechanisms to bridge such gaps. ii. Potential Impacts. Identification of project activities that will result in resettlement, the zone of impact of these activities, and alternatives considered to avoid or minimize resettlement. Impacts on communities both upstream and downstream of the reservoir should be identified. As part of defining the project impacts, it is essential that the Consultant work with the project authorities to agree on a cut-off date for resettlement eligibility and communicate this to the PAPs in writing. In addition, a specific emphasis should be placed on impacts on those people who are currently being resettled, and those who were displaced from the project area when initial construction of Rogun hydro-electric power plant commenced in the 80s of the past century and who have relocated back to the project site. iii. Profile of Communities to be Resettled and Compensated. This section will refer to the socio-economic baseline studies to detail the following: Current occupants of the project affected area to establish a basis for designing the resettlement program; Characteristics of displaced households, including a baseline information of livelihoods such as relevant production levels and income derived from both formal and informal economic activities and standards of living of the affected population; The magnitude of the expected loss - total or partial ­ of assets, and the extent of displacement, physical or economic. Types of losses can include, but are not limited to the following: agricultural land, residential land, houses, 23 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference structures, standing crops and trees, income, cultural and religious property (e.g. grave/sacred shrine), other productive assets, community buildings and structures. Information on vulnerable groups, for whom special provisions may need to be made; Information on land tenure rights and systems, including an inventory of common property natural resources from which people derive their livelihood, and non-title based usufruct systems including fishing, grazing, or use of forest areas; Identification of categories of loss of access to resources (e.g. grazing land) or services (hospital) including where the physical asset may not be affected, but there is cut-off or loss of access to the asset as a result of project works. Information on further livelihood of population by categories to be resettled to the new living places in order to identify employment and training/retraining for diverse types of professions. iv. Valuation of Compensation. The methodology to be used in valuing losses to determine their replacement value and a description of the proposed types and levels of compensation. v. Entitlement Matrix and Compensation Measures. Definition of affected persons and criteria for determining their eligibility for compensation and resettlement assistance. An entitlement matrix defining compensation packages and other resettlement measures that will assist each category of eligible persons. Resettlement measures should be prepared in consultation with affected population and should be framed within the overall approach of livelihood restoration and development. A sample entitlement matrix is provided in Annex 3.4 vi. Compensation Procedures. This covers how compensation and resettlement measures will be implemented. It includes details of information flows, money and in kind transfers to people, paperwork and sign off for package approval for each PAP, how transportation will take place etc. An important part is agreement on a cut off date which is to be communicated to the PAPs in writing. vii. Resettlement Sites. Relocation sites considered and explanation of those selected, detailing: Process of involving affected populations in identifying potential housing sites, assessing advantages and disadvantages and selecting sites; 4 Based on the profile of affected people and the valuation of compensation, the entitlement matrix will define and identify each category of affected persons, each type of recognized asset or access to asset loss, and specify the compensation rate or other resettlement measure to mitigate against that loss. Compensation may include a range of measures. Direct measures could be replacement of the asset in kind, cash based on calculation of market replacement value, providing access to an alternative school while indirect measures could include training for job opportunities in new site, providing access to micro-credit for community development initiatives, provision of cash lump sum against intangible impacts such as disturbance and trauma etc. The aim of the entitlement matrix is to ensure that the formula ensures that a compensation package can be easily and transparently designed for every PAP that assures livelihood restoration and development opportunities. 24 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference Mechanisms for procuring, developing and allotting resettlement sites, including awarding of title or use rights to allotted lands; Measures for studying lands fertility to identify profitable cultivation of agriculture and creation of SMEs on agro-processing. Consultations with host communities about the new settlers. Have they participated in the identification of potential impacts on their communities and defining appropriate mitigation measures? Do the host communities have a share of the resettlement benefits (e.g. education, water, health, and any community development funds or programs)? viii. Livelihood Restoration/Rehabilitation. Strategies for livelihood restoration and improvement should address the following questions: Are the compensation entitlements sufficient to restore livelihoods and income streams for each category of impact? Are additional rehabilitation measures necessary to promote longer term social and economic uplift of the project area and to respond to the development framework within which resettlement should take place? Does income restoration require change in livelihoods, development of alternative farmlands or other activities, that require a substantial amount of training and include such training in the compensation package. Are there any social or community development programs operating in the project area? Are there any opportunities for the project to support new programs or expand existing programs to support the development needs of the affected and host communities. It is also expected that there will be analysis of the potential for development and investment to benefit communities who will live around the newly formed reservoir (e.g. tourism, fishing, etc.) ix. Participation and Consultation. A consultation strategy building on the stakeholder analysis, which describes : Process of promoting meaningful consultation of the affected people and stakeholders in the preparation and implementation of resettlement activities, including facilitating the participation of vulnerable groups and women. Process of involving the affected population and other stakeholders in project monitoring. Plan for disseminating information about the RAP, grievance channels, ongoing project activities, and other issues such as an awareness program for contractors and local communities on HIV/AIDS transmission x. Grievance Procedures. Identification of affordable and accessible procedures for settlement of disputes related to the planning and implementation of resettlement activities. Establish a procedure for recording grievances and response times for resolution of problems. Identify agencies responsible for implementing these procedures. 25 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference xi. Institutional Arrangements. Organizational framework for implementing resettlement activities, describing: Agencies responsible for implementing all aspects of resettlement program. This includes implementing compensation procedures (including the delivery of each item/activity in the entitlement matrix), implementation of other resettlement measures (e.g. payment of allowances, training, development programs, service provision, income restoration etc.), communicating and informing PAPs etc. and coordination of activities for implementation of the RAP; Coordination arrangements, if resettlement activities involve different government agencies and jurisdictions; Identify clearly the various rolez of project authority, Government agencies, civil society, private sector and community representatives and organizations as appropriate. Assess the institutional capacity for and commitment to resettlement, identify gaps and recommend measures to ensure delivery of the program. xii. Costs and Budget. Aside from the compensation calculation tables and the entitlement matrix which will have detailed costs to estimate losses, this section will project the costing of resettlement program, taking into account a range of potential compensation packages for different categories of affected people. It will also estimate costs for identified additional resettlement measures such as training and associated development programs in the new area and around the reservoir. xiii. Monitoring and Evaluation. Framework defining the arrangements for evaluating impacts and measuring outcomes, including: Performance monitoring indicators derived from the socioeconomic baseline to measure inputs, outputs, and outcomes for resettlement activities; Frequency of reporting and integrating feedback from monitoring activities into project implementation. Institutional responsibilities ensuring adequate role and representation of civil society, private sector and community groups. 61. Sample table of contents for both RPF and RAP are provided in Annex 3. Resettlement Audit 62. Following on the resettlement audit done in the initial social screening, the Consultancy will identify gaps in the current program and recommend retroactive measures to make it consistent with the RPF, pilot RAPs and World Bank OP 4.12. These measures should be detailed showing cost implications, institutional responsibilities and a potential time-line for implementation. 63. Legacy Issues: The Consultancy will also look at past resettlement done under Soviet times when this project was initiated. It will describe policy guidelines, 26 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference entitlement matrix and other provisions. It will identify gaps in the program and reflect on the financial and social implications of undertaking possible retroactive measures for this legacy resettlement. Resettlement Action Plans: 64. Consistent with the laws and policies in Tajikistan as well as the World Bank`s policy on Involuntary Resettlement, the RAP will be developed based on up-to-date information about the number and characteristics of affected people, the impacts on the displaced populations and other adversely affected groups, resettlement alternatives and appropriate mitigation measures as well as legal issues involved in resettlement. The RAP will build upon the social screening socio-economic baseline and the RPF. 65. The RAP builds on the legal policies, entitlement matrix, compensation procedures, institutional arrangements and M & E framework detailed in the RPF. It covers all the areas discussed in the RPF but goes further to detail on some additional areas. The RAP serves as a detailed plan that lays out all the activities to be done to implement the resettlement program, breaking this up per household as appropriate. Areas of additional detail are: Household level resettlement packages taking into account the profile of the household, existence of vulnerable persons, household asset base, eligibility for any additional development measures, potential to restore livelihood in new site etc. Implementation Schedule. An implementation schedule covering all resettlement activities from project preparation through implementation, including a description of the linkage between resettlement implementation and the initiation of civil works. Tables showing itemized cost estimates for all resettlement activities, including planning and implementation, management and administration, monitoring and evaluation, and contingencies. Detail and be specific on all areas covered in the RPF such as institutional responsibilities, compensation procedures, monitoring arrangements etc. Where the RPF has not specified the appropriate office, or the detailed procedure, the RAP must provide the details. Scope of RAP in this Consultancy: For the purposes of this Consultancy it is expected that detailed RAPs will be prepared for villages to be submerged within Phase 1 of the project. However, the initial screening should recommend the detailed scope of the exact number of villages to be covered in the Phase 1 RAP. 27 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 4.5 Panels of Experts 66. As customary for projects of this size and complexity two Panels of Experts (PoE) will be established by the project owner for dam safety and for environmental and social safeguards aspects. The PoEs will be comprised of impartial, international and national experts and act as reviewers and advisors. 67. The Consultant will be expected to coordinate and liaise with the PoEs and provide the experts with findings and documentation from the assignment on request. 4.6 Links to Safeguards Information 68. The following links provide additional information on the World Bank Group`s safeguards policies and environmental and social tools, instruments and practices: World Bank Safeguards Website www.worldbank.org/safeguards Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Tool Kit Website www.worldbank.org/seatoolkit IFC`s Sustainability Policy Framework www.ifc.org 5. SCHEDULE OF REPORTS 69. The ESIA will be following the sequencing of the Techno Economic Assessment Study (TEAS), which will be phased as follows: Phase 0 Assessment of the Salt-Dome issue Phase I Assessment of the Existing Rogun HPP Works Phase II Rogun HPP Project Definition Options Phase III Detailed Assessment of the of the Selected Option 70. The individual reports (including draft documents) to be produced under this assignment are listed in Table 1 below, and the timeframe for their delivery indicated. The Consultant should include in its proposal a list of data required from, and data to be supplied to the TEAS consultants, with approximate timing 71. Parallel to the ESIA a Dam Safety Report (DSR) will be elaborated by the Panel of Experts (PoE). The Consultant will be aware of its progress and the activities of the PoE and draw upon / integrate relevant findings. 72. For the whole duration of the assignment the Consultant shall provide monthly reports, enabling the Client to assess the progress in relation to the overall tasks as well as indicating any unforeseen problems, obstacles or findings requiring the Client`s attention. 28 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference Table 1: Overview of report schedule Timeframe Deliverable Other Studies (weeks from the date of commencement of services) 8 Inception report and Techno-Economic Assessment Environmental/Social Screening (TEAS): Draft stage 1 and Phase II report reports (approx. 11 weeks) 16 Draft Environmental and Social Assessment (ESIA) report for Stage 1 (crest at 1,060 m asl) Inception report for Stage 2 ESIA 20 Final ESIA report for Stage 1 (crest at TEAS: Final Stage 1 and Phase II 1,060 m asl) reports (approx. 22 weeks) Consideration of extension of ESIA to full Resettlement Action Plans (RAPs) for Stage 2 (full dam) 34 Draft ESIA report for Stage 2 (full dam) including Environmental Management Plan and MP 38 Final draft ESIA report for Stage 2 (full dam) Disclosure to stakeholders for comments 47 Disclosure period ends, public consultations held, comments received 52 Finalization of Stage 2 (full dam) ESIA report, EMP and MP 67 TEAS: Draft Phase III report RAPs: Draft RAPs for Stage 2 (full dam) 75 TEAS: Final Phase III report RAPs: Final RAPs for Stage 2 (full dam) 6. OUTPUTS AND DELIVERABLES 73. The inception reports and short monthly progress reports shall be prepared in English and Russian with the Executive Summary in English, Russian and Tajik. The draft and final reports will be prepared in both English and Russian, with the Executive Summaries also in Tajik language. Local disclosure of the final reports in Russian is required, including public notice and specification of availability of the reports at the Ministry of Energy and Industries or other suitable, publicly accessible locations, especially in the proposed project area. Wide-ranging channels of communication, 29 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference identified as part of the Outreach Strategy, will be used to disseminate such key elements of the RAP as compensation/rehabilitation measures, entitlement policies, and grievance redress mechanisms. 74. The Consultant shall prepare and present the reports and other documentation to the project sponsors for comments and approvals. In general the project sponsors will review it and convey its comments to the Consultants within ten (10) working days from the date it receives the reports and documentation. The Consultant shall present the final version to the Ministry within ten (10) working days from the date it receives the comments. The foreseen schedule is specified in the Table in Section 5 above. 75. The Initial Environmental and Social Screening reporting shall include: a) Ten (10) copies of the Inception Report which shall provide a work plan and schedule and the annotated content of the reports. b) Twenty (20) copies of the final reports and fifty (50) copies of the Executive Summary, which shall have incorporated the comments provided by the Ministry of Energy and Industries. The final reports shall be presented within two (2) weeks from the date of receiving comments from the Ministry. The final reports shall be supplied as hard copies and on CDs in Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, and the drawings in AutoCAD, or similar software. 76. The Environmental & Social Impact Assessments for both project stages (asl 1060m and 335m dam crest), the EMP, MP, Monitoring Framework for socio- economic impacts, RPF, RAPs and Resettlement Audit shall be submitted in the following manner: c) Twenty (20) copies of an inception report that shall be presented within one (1) month from the date of commencement of the task. The Inception Report shall provide the work plan and schedule and the annotated content of the reports. d) Ten (10) copies of the monthly progress reports. These reports shall be provided within five (5) working days after the end of the month covered in the report. These reports shall briefly summarize, inter alia, the Consultant`s activities, highlight important aspects and actions, address specific difficulties encountered or to be expected and their solutions, progress achieved and comparison with the contractual schedule, and expenditures on various activities as per the Contract. They may include all simultaneous environmental and social activities carried out under the assignment. e) Stage 1 Assessment: The present terms of reference have been prepared for assisting GOT in developing the hydropower potential of the Rogun site in an optimal manner. In order to achieve that goal, the Consultant will have to take into account the following Stage 1 option: Before raising the dam to the final design height, an intermittent stage is planned by the GoT coincident with the completion of technical, environmental and social studies, riparian consultation and financial arrangements for the final, full project design. This stage 1 would comprise raising the embankment dam to level 30 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 1,060 m above sea level, with operating water level at 1,055 m above sea level; it would entail the completion of intake structure and hydro-tunnels, as well as the installation of the first two of six 600MW units with replaceable runners. The operation of this stage would be quasi run of the river with a reservoir capacity of well below 250 Mill m3. The units would yield a maximum capacity of 120 MW each due to the low water head. The Consultant will thus organize studies and works in a way to advance a compressed and downscaled study for this Stage 1 project before proceeding to the study for the full size Rogun HEP. In accordance with the ToR for the full size Rogun study, this optional assessment will comprise: (i) environmental and social screening, (ii) environmental and social impact assessment (iii) environmental management plan (EMP) (iv) instrumentation and monitoring plan (v) disclosure of project information, consultation with public and affected stakeholders (vi) monitoring Framework for socio-ecnomic impacts (vii) resettlement policy framework (RPF) (viii) resettlement action plan (RAP) (ix) resettlement audit The strategic environmental assessment (SEA) envisaged for the full size Rogun HEP is anticipated to start parallel to the Stage 1 assessment. The main outputs for Stage 1will be an ESIA report, an EMP, and a RAP which will have to be produced within the timeframe allocated to the phases of the ToR dedicated to (A) Data Collection and Desk Study and (B) Audit and Initial Screening Phase. Twenty (20) copies of the Stage 1 draft assessment shall be presented and twenty (20) copies of the final reports have incorporating comments provided by the project sponsors, and fifty (50) copies of the Executive Summary shall be provided. The final reports shall be presented within ten (10) working days from the date of receiving comments from the project sponsor. f) Complete Assessment: The draft assessment report for the full Rogun project (high dam) shall be presented within nine (9) months from the date of commencement of the work, including twenty (20) copies of the draft report and fifty (50) copies of the Executive Summary. 31 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference g) Twenty (20) copies of the final reports that shall have incorporated the comments provided by the project sponsors and received during consultations with the public, and fifty (50) copies of the Executive Summary respectively shall be presented within ten (10) working days from the date of receiving the last comments. The final reports shall be furnished in hard copies and electronically as Microsoft Office documents (2003 upwards), and the drawings in .dwg or .dxf formats compatible with AutoCAD (2004 and younger) or similar software. The due date for the delivery of the final reports shall be 12 months after commencement of the work. 77. All reports and deliverables should be available in both Russian and English, in equal numbers (i.e. half of required number in each language). 7. DISCLOSURE AND CONSULTATION 78. In addition to searching information from and providing information to Project- Affected People and other stakeholders, as described in previous sections, the Consultant shall consult these groups, as well as the riparian countries to Vakhsh and Amu Darya river basins with respect to the findings of the environmental and social studies work. Such consultations shall take place at appropriate milestones, and notably towards the end of the Preliminary Environmental and Social Screening, as well as during the development of and finalizing of the ESIA, Monitoring framework for socio-economic impacts, Resettlement Audit, RPF and RAP. The consultations shall be comprehensive, wide-ranging, open, and meaningful. 8. CONDUCT OF STUDY PROGRAM 79. The Consultant shall provide overall management of all the aspects of the work/services. The Consultant shall nominate a Project Manager and a Deputy Manager (during all times of unavailability of the former) to liaise with the Client`s designated representative. All contractual matters shall be channeled through these persons. The Consultant shall also provide the necessary level of independent quality assurance and control of the work. 80. The Consultant staff shall work closely with the Client`s staff assigned to the work, and shall coordinate with Consultants for the Technical Studies and other consultants working with other relevant aspects of the Project, including the Panels of Experts to be established for dam safety and environmental / social issues in the project. The Consultant shall liaise and undertake meetings with the Consultant for the Technical Studies during all relevant phases of the work to ensure that both Consultant teams share all necessary information with each other to facilitate the high quality execution of both the technical and environmental/social assignments. 81. The Consultant shall be fluent in English and have staff with good knowledge of technical Russian. 82. The Consultant shall implement his internal quality control and assurance procedures during the execution of the Contract, and shall demonstrate that they are being applied to his work. 32 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 83. The Consultant shall implement an effective capacity development program which integrates seconded personnel of the Borrower / Project Sponsor into the work. The Consultant shall be prepared to accommodate in his site office(s) a team of professionals seconded by the Borrower / Project Sponsor, and thereby to train them while on the job. 84. The Consultant shall provide all necessary work office equipment (computers and software, office machinery etc.) and the means of transport required for the work. 85. The Consultant shall provide and quality-assure translation services from English into Russian / Tajik and vice versa. 86. The Consultant shall be given office space in Dushanbe and at Rogun free of charge by the Government. The understanding shall be, that the bulk of the Consultant`s staff would be located at the site and most work would be accomplished with close proximity to field conditions and affected stakeholders. 33 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 9. SERVICES PROVIDED BY CLIENT / PROJECT SPONSORS 87. The Services to be provided by the Borrower / Project Sponsor to the Consultant shall encompass the following: Provision of all available relevant environmental and technical documentation related to the Project will be provided free of charge for the Consultant; Facilitation of access to the existing HPPs along Vakhsh River, esp. Rogun and Sangtuda 1 sites, the other prospective project sites and all related transmission and infrastructure corridors / alignments as necessary; Access to land cadastre and other government sources of data; Provision of Office space as required; suitably furnished with heating, lighting, electricity, international telephone and internet connections; the Consultant shall, however, include all communication costs into the project`s budget; Cooperation with and assistance to the Consultant of staff of the responsible line Ministry and of other agencies as required at the expense of the Ministry and agencies; Assistance with liaison between the Consultant and Government agencies in Tajikistan at national and local levels; Facilitation with other government agencies in charge of issues relevant to land acquisition and resettlement, including utility agencies; For whatever services the Ministry of Energy and Industries cannot provide, the Consultant shall make own arrangements 34 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference ANNEX 1 Documents and Deliverables Generally Required Under the World Bank's Safeguard Policies. Documents / deliverables required during Policy No. Topic preparation implementation operation EA process, Environmental OP 4.01 including EIA, EMP / MP (EMP) / MP Assessment (EA) EMP, MP compensation Natural included in EA plan, included in included in EMP + OP 4.04 Habitats under OP 4.01 EMP + MP, OP MP, OP 4.01 4.01 Pest included in EA Pest Management (reference in OP 4.09 Management under OP 4.01 Plan (PMP) ISR/ICR) Indigenous social assessment, (reference in OP 4.10 IPP / RAP Peoples IPP ISR/ICR) Physical Cultural included in EA PCR management (reference in OP 4.11 Resources under OP 4.01 plan (part of EA) ISR/ICR) Involuntary RPF, RAP (and RAP (and other (reference in OP 4.12 Resettlement other instruments) instruments) ISR/ICR) included in EA Included in EMP + included in EMP + OP 4.36 Forest under OP 4.01 MP, OP 4.01 MP, OP 4.01 DSR & emergency dam safety report DSR & emergency preparedness Safety 5 OP 4.37 (DSR), TOR for preparedness plan plan , dam of Dams PoE (ERP) instrumentation & monitoring plan SCR, disclosure of contd. information OP 17.50 Disclosure SIR ESIA & EMP & consultation International OP/BP 7.50 notification of riparian states Waterways Disputed OP/BP 7.60 legal / political negotiations Areas Fields hatched in grey: no specific documents required from Consultant at preparation stage Acronyms: DSR dam safety report EA environmental assessment process EIA category A environmental impact EMP environmental management plan assessment report ERP emergency response plan ESIA environmental / social impact assessment ICR implementation completion report IPP indigenous peoples plan ISR implementation status report MP monitoring plan PCR physical cultural resources PoE Panel of Experts RAP resettlement action plan RPF resettlement policy framework SCR stakeholder consultation report SIR stakeholder identification report 5 This is commonly not released to the Public. 35 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference ANNEX 2 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN: FORMAT FOR SUMMARY TABLES/APPENDICES A. MITIGATION PLAN Cost of Mitigating Phase Issue Mitigation Responsibility* Measure (if Substantial) I. Implementation / Construction II. Operation 35 36 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference B. MONITORING PLAN [Parameters in Monitoring Plan should be matched to issues in Mitigation Plan] Monitoring How When Cost is the parameter is the parameter What is the cost What parameter Where to be monitored/ to be monitored- of equipment or Phase is to be is the parameter Responsibility type of frequency of contractor monitored? to be monitored? monitoring measurement or charges to equipment? continuous? perform monitoring I. Construction II. Operation 36 37 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference C. INSTITUTIONAL STRENGTHENING 1. Equipment Purchases List items in tabular form showing: Type of equipment Number of units Local or international purchase Total cost 2. Training List in tabular form showing: Type of Training Number of students [also indicate current and future organization unit or current and future title/job description] Duration of training Start/ends dates for each student Venue [domestic or abroad] Institute/Provider Total costs 3. Consultant Services/Special Studies Provide description of: Type of Services Summary TOR [attach full TOR] Justification Local or international purchase Cost 37 38 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference D. SCHEDULE Present (preferably in Chart Form) Start Dates and Finish Dates for: Mitigation Activities Monitoring Activities Training Activities This information should be keyed to the overall project schedule (as defined in the Project Implementation Plan) E. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS Provide a narrative discussion supported by organizational charts detailing: Responsibilities for mitigation and monitoring Environmental information flow (reporting--from who and to who and how often) Decision making chain of command for environmental management (to take action, to authorize expenditures, to shut down, etc.) In short, how is all the monitoring data going to be used to maintain sound environmental performance--who collects the data, who analyzes it, who prepares reports, who are the reports sent to and how often, and who does that person send it to, or what does he/she do with the information--who has the authority to spend, shutdown, change operations etc. F. CONSULTATION WITH LOCAL NGOs AND PROJECT-AFFECTED GROUPS (may be presented as an appendix) Provide documentation of the following: Date(s) consultation(s) was (were) held Location(s) consultation(s) was (were) held Who was invited Name, Organization or Occupation, Telephone/Fax/e-mail number/address (home and/or office) Who attended Name, Organization or Occupation, Telephone/Fax/e-mail number/address (home and/or office) Meeting Program/Schedule What is to be presented and by whom Summary Meeting Minutes (Comments, Questions and Response by Presenters) 38 | P a g e 39 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference ANNEX 3 RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK and RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN: SAMPLE TABLE OF CONTENTS (The Consultant should add, delete, or amend it as necessary) 1. Project description 2. Baseline socioeconomic information of the project areas. 3. Avoidance or reduction of displacement 4. Identification of Project-Affected People, including vulnerable groups 5. Identification of the exact number of households (including quantities of families) that are planned to be resettled including vulnerable groups . Consultation and participation 6. Land acquisition/ resettlement mechanisms 7. Entitlement Matrix 8. Green light conditions of resettlement 9. Coordination with civil works 10. Institutional arrangement 11. Training 12. Monitoring and reporting 13. Grievance procedures and communication strategy 14. Complete estimation of property and income of families to be resettled with further compensation 14. Budget and funding 15. Contingencies and flexibility 39 40 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference Sample Entitlement Matrix: ENTITLEMENTS CATEGORY TYPE OF OF PAP LOSS Compensation for Compensation for Compensation for Moving Other Loss of Structures Loss of Assets Loss of Income Allowance Assistance Food from WFP Land replacement at new Crops at market cost in during Loss of land --- site, plus land clearing by None scarce season construction of project Property new site Owners Loss of Compensation at full Fences (wire or wood) at $ For lost rental income Moving to be Disturbance structure replacement value not 3/meter Lump sum cash payment of done Allowance of Residential or depreciated Hand-dug wells at $200 6 months rent per tenant free by project $100 business Residential No loss of structure, no Replacement cost for non- Free moving if 6 months rent Tenant: Loss of rental entitlement to housing at movables if installation was No loss of income notification equivalent for accommodation new site agreed with owner before deadline disturbance Business Tenant For loss of business Free moving if Loss of Replacement cost for facilities No loss income, payment of half of notification premises that cannot be moved turnover for 6 months before deadline Relocation to resettlement Food from WFP site of choice, with payment Encroachers during Loss of land --- of rental fee for land. For --- --- (using land) construction of crops, fences and wells, as new site above for owners Compensation at full Squatters replacement value for Disturbance Payments in lieu of wages (living on Loss of shelter structure, relocation to None Allowance of while rebuilding site) resettlement site, with $100 payment of site rent 40 | P a g e 41 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference ANNEX 4 GUIDANCE ON ADDITIONAL ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED DURING SOCIAL SCREENING OF PROJECT AFFECTED COMMUNITIES Profile and map the general population of the basin area, identify categories of project-affected people; Assess existing communication channels between official authorities and local population, including grievance channels and develop an effective communication strategy and mechanisms; Define the process on the basis of which the riparian countries are informed Identify temporary and permanent land acquisition requirements and the scale of displacement resulting from the project; Prepare a socio-economic baseline that is representative for the range of affected communities, using a mix of quantitative and qualitative techniques. The aim of this study is not so much to cover every household through lengthy statistical questionnaires but rather to use a range of tools to get analytical depth on understanding the impact of the project on aspects of their lives. Questionnaires should be limited to relevant issues linked to potential project impacts. The quantitative data should be adequately contextualized with qualitative methods such as focus group discussions, personal interviews and it is highly recommended that it include some in depth case histories using 3-4 day participant observation techniques to represent the range of affected households. The analysis should cover the livelihood profiles, land ownership, tenure and access patterns, household structure and social/kinship networks. The analysis should look at both formal and informal sources of livelihoods, access to resources (private and common property) and support structures. The socio-economic analysis should identify categories of vulnerable groups specific to the impacts from this project, describe the activities that will negatively affect them and justify why they should be recognized as eligible for special measures under the project. The socio-economic analysis will also review access to services in the dam area as well as the proposed new sites. Study the proposed new resettlement sites, available resources (land, employment, informal income sources etc.) and impact on kinship support structures. Identify areas where communities may need additional support to re-build their livelihoods. Specifically issues related to potential conflict areas with host communities should be studied. Review information sharing, feedback and greviance channels in place for affected communities to communicate with local and project authorities and the role for civil society (link to Stakeholder Analysis) 41 42 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference Institutional set up, leadership structures (traditional and state recognized) and social stratification within the communities. Impacts on the downstream communities as a result of changes in the flow of the river. Specific attention to the impacts on the use of riverine resources (e.g. cultivation on banks, fishing, foraging for wild grasses, food, cultural sites etc.) Any additional issues to be discussed that the project needs to identify to ensure that resettlement takes place within a livelihoods and development framework. Recommend the detailed scope that the RAP (within this consultancy) should cover taking into account the proposed schedule of works and the Government`s resettlement schedule. The RAP should cover atleast all villages scheduled to be affected in Phase 1 of the project. Assess the impact of changes in river flow regimes on communities, both directly impacted by the project and those who live upstream/downstream of the reservoir, in terms of socio-economic activities, fishery resources, land use, drinking water, etc.; Assess the impact of population influx during and after construction, especially on local communities; Assess the capacity of governmental and non-governmental services that are locally available to carry out awareness campaign relating to the risk of HIV transmission and other diseases that may result from the inflow of migrant workers; Assess job loss and job creation during and after construction, including indirect economic activities (e.g. transport, tourism, etc.); Assess availability and cost of alternative land to be provided to the displaced population, locally or otherwise, and assessment of utilities and other critical services provided in such alternative lands; Consider impact of any resettlement on neighboring villages, directly or indirectly (e.g. cut off from school, market); Examine the integration of the infrastructural development of the area into the construction requirements for the Project (e.g. roads and bridges, housing, schools, medical services and disease control programs); Identify issues relating to the minimization of short-term impact during construction to be addressed in future construction contracts; Assess other social and cultural impacts resulting from the Project, including family and community as well as cultural property issues; Carry out environmental screenings and produce EIAs/EMPs for resettlement areas, where development of infrastructure and residential construction of substantial scale is to be expected. 42 43 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference ANNEX 5 A: MAP OF ENERGY PRODUCTION AND POTENTIAL IN TAJIKISTAN B: SCHEMATIC SKETCH OF VAKHSH RIVER MASTERPLAN (INCL. ALL PLANNED AND EXISTING HPP FACILITIES) 43 44 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference ANNEX 6 Riparian Stakeholder Consultations (October 2008- April 2009): Comments and Responses Para/ Issue/Concern Modification of Original Draft Terms of Reference Coverage in Final Terms of Reference (ToR) Bullet Government of Uzbekistan Expert Opinion: Rogun Hydro-electric Power Station Across the Vakhsh River and its Construction Risks (November 2008) 1. Engineering design documents for the The term feasibility has been replaced with assessment to Engineering designs are not being prepared now. The studies construction of Rogun are being developed properly reflect the stage of project study and align English are at the review and assessment level of detail (as designed in violation of the international rules and Russian terminology. References to possible future steps earlier and partly implemented), covering technical, economic, (norms). such as preparation of bid documents etc have been removed financial, environmental and social aspects. For completeness, from the TORs. World Bank President Zoellick`s letter dated a fourth phase is identified in the ToR but is subject to funding April 15, 2009 underscores that the World Bank has only and the results of the assessments themselves. agreed to assist in the conduct of the two assessment studies. Reference to a fourth phase has been added to the ToR to enable continuation of studies and next stage preparation. However, this fourth phase will not proceed as it is subject to additional funding from the World Bank, and will depend on the results from the assessments. The Tajik Party is implementing Several consultations have taken place since release of the These studies will encompass consultation with stakeholders, engineering design and construction of the original draft Terms of Reference, including World Bank led as per the World Bank`s Safeguards Policies and will provide Rogun HPS without any information consultations in Turkmenistan, Republic of Krygyz, comprehensive information as requested to enable a exchange or consultations with the Kazakhstan, Afghanistan and Tajikistan (Sept-Oct 2008), meaningful consultation with the riparian states (see also letter transboundary states receipt of the Expert Opinion from Government of Uzbekistan from Lars Thunnel to President Azimov dated March 30, (Nov 2008), consultations in Uzbekistan (Jan 2009), letters 2009). Specifically, paragraph 41 of the ESIA ToR requires at between the Government of Uzbekistan and the World Bank least two rounds of consultation as well as public disclosure of Group (August 14, 2007, November 10, 2998, April 18, 2008, documents according to World Bank policies (See section 4.3 April 25, 2008, March 3, 2009, March 30, 2009, April 15, paragraphs 60-64 of the ESIA ToR). 2009). The ToR specify the need for panels of experts and indicate the The ToR require panels of experts that are selected as consultants are to work closely with those panels. Paragraph 74 objective technical experts. The members of the Panel,, of the ESIA ToR and Section 3of the TEAS ToR elaborate that 44 selected by the World Bank, would be recognized international the consultants will be aware of the progress and the activities 45 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference professionals from outside the countries of the former Soviet of the panels and draw upon / integrate relevant findings. The Union. The Terms of Reference will be prepared by the World panels will oversee execution of the consultants` services. The Bank based on operational policies, and riparian input on members of the Panel,, selected by the World Bank, would be trans-boundary issues, taking into account Nukus Declaration.. recognized international professionals from outside the They will be shared with key stakeholders. The Panel will countries of the former Soviet Union. The Terms of review the technical rigor and results of the assessment Reference will be prepared by the World Bank based on studies, participate in decisions related to study progress and operational policies, and riparian input on trans-boundary report their views to interested partners. There will be no issues, taking into account Nukus Declaration. They will be separate panel of experts contracted by the Government of shared with key stakeholders. The Panel will review the Tajikistan. technical rigor and results of the assessment studies, participate in decisions related to study progress and report their views to interested partners. There will be no separate panel of experts The World Bank may also access independent experts as contracted by the Government of Tajikistan. counsel on cross-border impacts. All reports by environmental and social consultants and panel The World Bank may also, separately, access independent are public and subject to stakeholder review, scrutiny and experts as counsel on cross-border impacts comment. All reports by environmental and social consultants and panel are public and subject to stakeholder review, scrutiny and comment. 2. If Rogun is built and operated following a Reference to both local and riparian impacts has been specified The ESIA ToR explicitly includes riparian and cross-border and power regime then the number of years with in the objectives of the ESIA (Paragraph 16). impacts in the scope of assessment (paragraph 16). 3. intermittent water availability would vary Downstream water regimes and riparian impacts are captured from 12 -23 within a 50-year period, with a An additional set of tasks has been specified in the ESIA ToR in several places, especially in the ESIA ToRs (e.g., worst case scenario of 28-39 years, to the dealing explicitly with impact assessment in riparian countries paragraphs 16, 25, 34, 43, 46, 51, 78) great disadvantage of vital interests of (Box 7). The section refers to the Nukus Declaration and also downstream countries requires assessment of water use, impact of flow regimes on The reservoir simulation study (paragraph 6.11) will explore environmental, social and economic interests downstream, and operating regimes. Emerging opportunities for increased links the ESIA to reservoir simulations undertaken in the mutual benefits (see note below) and possible of risks of TEAS, with particular reference to project costs and design. alternative reservoir operating regimes will be assessed in terms of environmental and social assessments (Box 7 of The impact on river flow regime in Box 6 has been detailed in ESIA) and the economic/financial analysis (paragraphs 6.18/19 terms of changes in water quantity, pattern and quality of TEAS). downstream. Paragraph 6.11 of the TEAS ToRs also instructs the consultant A paragraph on water regulation both upstream and to prepare an initial reservoir filling schedule as well as downstream has been added to the description of the initial simulating reservoir operations for the next 50-60 years. environmental and social screening (paragraph 25). The ToR have been revised to explore a range of possible 45 46 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference reservoir operations to identify opportunities for increased mutual benefits and to articulate risks, in terms of environmental and social assessments (Box 7 of ESIA) and the economic/financial analysis (paragraphs 6.18/19 of TEAS). Additional references have been made throughout the ESIA ToR to emphasize the inclusion of riparian interests and cross- border impacts of the project. 4. Present seismic and tectonic conditions Reference to the favourable site has been removed. Section 4.1 (Phase 0) of the TOR for TEAS specifies a review shows that the area for construction of the of the salt dome question (including influence on dam safety) Rogun HPS had been picked very Reference to safety has been added in paragraph 6.3, with and section 6.3 addresses the safety of the underground power unfavourably, raising risks of increased specific instructions that it should be thoroughly investigated. house cavern. Sections 6.5, 6.6 and 7.12 focus on geological seismic activity and new earthquakes, and seismic aspects of dam safety. washouts and dam failure, and salt The first phase of the TEAS is the geological and Geotechnical formation Investigation of the Salt Dome in the Dam foundation and Paragraph 44 and Box 2 of the TORs for ESIA also examine Reservoir. It has been added that the consultant shall not these issues. proceed to the next phase of assessment unless the client authorizes after careful review and acceptance of the salt dome report, in consultation with the Panel of Experts 5. Dam failure in case of earthquake would Provisions for an instrumentation plan for monitoring the Paragraph 6.6 of the TEAS requires seismic studies including result in formation of an outburst wave with behavior of the dam through its lifetime and an emergency evaluation of seismic hazard, operating basis design a flow of 2.35 to 1.56 mlm m3, and preparedness plan have been added to the risk evaluation earthquake, and review and improvement of existing seismic flooding in an area of 69 thousand km2 (paragraph 6.20) and assessment report (paragraph 7.23 and monitoring network in the region. populated by approximately 5 million 7.24). people Both the TEAS (paragraph 7.23) and ESIA (two bullet points The environmental and social aspects of dam monitoring and below paragraph 51 (g)) require the preparation of a dam emergency preparedness, with particular reference to the monitoring plan and emergency preparedness plan and transboundary context are captured paragraph 51 of the ESIA communication plan as outlined in the World Bank safeguard ToR. guidelines. 6. The Rogun HPs area is known for active Linkages between the TEAS and ESIA studies have been Paragraph 6.5 of TEAS covers these aspects within a manifestation of recent physical-and- specified to ensure consistency. comprehensive geological, geophysical and geotechnical geological processes, with dangers of investigation. Related environmental and social risks are landslides covered in 44 of the TORs of ESIA 7. Capacity of the Tajik Civil Defense and See comments for point 5 above This issue is covered under the Emergency Preparedness Plan Emergency Service staff, equipment in section 7.23 in the TEAS. Also reinforced in the TORs of technology and training are not adequate to ESIA under paragraph 51 ensure safety and rapid elimination of disasters with the Rogun HPS area 8.. Unscheduled intensive winter discharges Reference to both local and riparian impacts has been specified Section 6.11 of TEAS addresses operations and flow would result in land degradation in the in the objectives of the ESIA (Paragraph 13). management in addition to the requirement for hydrologic lower reaches of the river modeling.. See also paragraphs 46 and 47 and Boxes 6 and 7 in 46 47 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 9. Reduced water flow in summer will cause An additional set of tasks has been specified in the ESIA ToR the TORs for ESIA. These paragraphs: accumulation of salts within the irrigated dealing explicitly with impact assessment in riparian countries Require examination of a range of reservoir operations area (Box 7). The section refers requires assessment of water use, and associated flow regimes in terms of environmental, 10. Reduced runoff and decreased water impact of flow regimes on environmental, social and economic social, economic and financial impacts in Tajikistan and discharge to the Aral Sea would cause interests downstream, and links the ESIA to reservoir riparian countries further desertification and change in simulations undertaken in the TEAS, with particular reference Include a review and evaluation of alternative institutional temperature regime. Climatic conditions to project costs and design. arrangements to monitor and enforce operating regimes would become inappropriate for living, but Require assessment of an environmental flow also detrimental for flora and fauna The impact on river flow regime in Box 6 has been detailed in 11, Estimates of losses and damages if water terms of changes in water quantity, pattern and quality The studies will also explore possible exports to Afghanistan 12 flow is reduced (e.g., US$4.1 billion per downstream. and Pakistan, which could provide a financial incentive for and year from land degradation, US$146.5 summer generation. 13. million from loss of flora and fauna) A paragraph on water regulation both upstream and downstream has been added to the description of the initial environmental and social screening (paragraph 34). The ToR have been revised to explore a range of reservoir operations to identify opportunities for increased mutual benefits and to articulate risks, in terms of environmental and social assessments (Box 7 of ESIA) and the economic/financial analysis (paragraphs 6.18/19 of TEAS). Additional references have been made throughout the ESIA ToR to emphasize the inclusion of riparian interests and cross- border impacts of the project. 14. Instead of Rogun consider alternatives such Small hydropower has been specified as one resource to be Evaluation of the alternatives from the power point of view is as small hydropower projects, with small considered in the generation expansion plan. provided for in the generation expansion plan in Annex 3 of daily storages. the TEAS and separate study on alternatives to Rogun to be managed by the World Bank. Note that some small hydro is already being pursued in Tajikistan. The ESA should cover not only the project See comments for points 8-13 above The geographic scope for the ESIA covers the relevant areas in area but all the affected countries Tajikistan and the relevant areas in all riparian states (see for example paragraph 46 and 47 Box 6 and Box 7 of the TORs of Reputed UN agencies (UNDP, UNEP, Involvement of other UN agencies is outside the scope of the ESIA). ICARDA, IPCC, and IUCN should be consultants work, although documents are available to UN involved in this exercise. agencies for review and comment. However, the World Bank will convene Panels of Experts to provide independent international input. Points from the Minutes of Consultations with Uzbek Authorities (January 2009) 47 48 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 1 UZ is concerned about quality assurance of The ToR require panels of experts that are selected as The ToR specify the need for panels of experts and indicate the TEAS and ESIA, needs guarantees that the objective technical experts. The members of the Panel, consultants are to work closely with those panels. The ToRs Panels of Experts (PoE) will be truly selected by the World Bank, would be recognized international for both the ESIA TEAS elaborate that the consultants will be independent, professionals from outside the countries of the former Soviet aware of the progress and the activities of the panels and draw Union The Terms of Reference will be prepared by the World upon / integrate relevant findings. The panels will oversee Bank based on operational policies, and riparian input on execution of the consultants` services. trans-boundary issues, taking into account Nukus Declaration. They will be shared with key stakeholders. The Panel will The members of the Panel, selected by the World Bank, would review the technical rigor and results of the assessment be recognized international professionals from outside the studies, participate in decisions related to study progress and countries of the former Soviet Union. The Terms of report their views to interested partners. There will be no Reference will be prepared by the World Bank based on separate panel of experts contracted by the Government of operational policies, and riparian input on trans-boundary Tajikistan. issues, taking into account Nukus Declaration. They will be shared with key stakeholders. The Panel will review the The World Bank may also access independent experts as technical rigor and results of the assessment studies, participate counsel on cross-border impacts. in decisions related to study progress and report their views to interested partners. There will be no separate panel of experts All reports by consultants and the environmental and social contracted by the Government of Tajikistan. panel are public and subject to stakeholder review, scrutiny and comment. The World Bank may also, separately, access independent experts as counsel on cross-border impacts. All reports by consultants and the environmental and social panel are public and subject to stakeholder review, scrutiny and comment. 2 UZ is concerned about outdated information Additional cautions have been added. Use of best available data and ensuring its quality is the sources, specifically seismic and professional responsibility of the consultants. The Dam safety geotechnical data, POE will be alert to this issue and provide oversight. 3 UZ expresses the strong wish that its Access is the prerogative of the Government of Tajikistan and experts should have access to the Rogun is outside the scope of the consultant`s authority. site (inaccessible for the past 18 years) 4 UZ underlines that potential impacts of Paragraph 7.21 of the TEAS and the World Bank managed energy exports to Pakistan on the Central study of alternatives to Rogun will analyze this issue. Asia energy system should be assessed 5 UZ has little trust in the long term reliability The World Bank will undertake an independent study of the The World Bank will undertake an independent review, in light of any arrangement to jointly operate various institutional options and their strengths, weaknesses of international experience, of possible institutional Roghun HPP (such as international and implementation. Determining the appropriate system is arrangements (e.g., a reservoir management commission with commission, PPP/consortium), citing outside the scope of the ToRs; however, the information multi-country representation) for monitoring reservoir 48 49 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference operation of Toktogul, Nurek and developed by the consultants would support consultation operations and regimes for ensuring compliance with Kairakum, all of which allegedly deviated among riparians. prescribed operations. A permanent international commission significantly from operational modes agreed to monitor the releases and a sanction regime linked to the when they were once commissioned escrowed export revenue are likely to be credible mechanisms. 6. UZ suggested that the PoE might be hired See point 1 above See point 1 above directly by the Bank, preferably not by the same department which is preparing / supervising the project (ECSSD) but by a Bank section which has no personal, political or commercial stakes in the project. 7 The TORs contain words and expressions With apologies, terminology has been modified and such indicating possible bias of the WB towards words and expressions removed to ensure a neutral stance. Rogun General Section 6.9 of the TEAS and Box 8 of the ESIA deal with climate change aspects in detail. Points from Turkmenistan Consultations(Sept-October 2008) 1. Though Rogun was originally designed to Reference to both local and riparian impacts has been specified The ESIA ToR explicitly includes riparian and cross-border operate in an irrigation mode with multi- in the objectives of the ESIA (Paragraph 16). impacts in the scope of assessment (paragraph 16). year water regulation as the primary Downstream water regimes and riparian impacts are captured objective, it might be operated in the An additional set of tasks has been specified in the ESIA ToR in several places, especially in the ESIA ToRs (e.g., power mode resulting in adverse changes dealing explicitly with impact assessment in riparian countries paragraphs 16, 25, 34, 43, 46, 51, 78) to the water flow. (Box 7). The section requires assessment of water use, impact The reservoir simulation study will explore a range of of flow regimes on environmental, social and economic operating regimes. Emerging opportunities for increased interests downstream, and links the ESIA to reservoir mutual benefits (see note below) and possible of risks of simulations undertaken in the TEAS. alternative reservoir operating regimes will be assessed in The impact on river flow regime in Box 6 has been detailed in terms of environmental and social assessments (Box 7 of terms of changes in water quantity, pattern and quality ESIA) and the economic/financial analysis (paragraphs 6.18/19 downstream. of TEAS). A paragraph on water regulation both upstream and Paragraph 6.11 of the TEAS ToRs also instructs the consultant downstream has been added to the description of the initial to prepare an initial reservoir filling schedule considering environmental and social screening (paragraph 25). effects on the downstream riparian states as well as simulating reservoir operations for the next 50-60 years. The ToR (paragraph 6.11 of the TEAS) have been revised to explore additional reservoir operations to identify opportunities for increased mutual benefits and to articulate risks, in terms of environmental and social assessments (Box 7 of ESIA) and the economic/financial analysis (paragraphs 6.18/19 of TEAS). 49 50 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference Additional references have been made throughout the ESIA ToR to emphasize the inclusion of riparian interests and cross- border impacts of the project. 2. TM needs guarantees (a) that there would The World Bank will undertake an independent study of the World Bank will take an independent review, in light of be no reduction in the present level of flows various institutional options and their strengths, weaknesses international experience of possible institutional arrangements as well as in the present flow regime (based and implementation. (e.g., a reservoir management commission with multi-country on the 1992 Agreement), and (b) that there representation) of monitoring reservoir operations regimes for would be no violation of the ecological It is outside the scope of these studies to establish a guarantee. ensuring compliance with prescribed operations. A safety in the downstream countries. However, the review and analysis of alternative institutions permanent international commission to monitor the releases will provide support for deliberations among riparians and and a sanction regime linked to the escrowed export revenue indicate their assessment of the preferred option. are likely to be credible mechanisms. 3. TM needs detailed information on the See point 1 above Collectively the TEAS and the ESIA are aimed at creating ecological, financial and social impact of such detailed information. The geographic boundaries include Rogun HEP and the associated risks to the impacts downstream of Rogun, extending to all riparian downstream population. countries. See for example, Boxes 6 and 7 in the ESIA. Points from Consultations with Kyrgyz, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, and Afghanistan(Sept ­Oct 2008) No significant point calling for revision of the TORs was made. 50 51 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference ANNEX 7 Information on available Feasibility Studies, Technical Project and Project Revision for Rogun HPP. There are the following materials available in the OJSC Rogun HPP: 1. Technical Project of Rogun HPP 1978 (Annex 1); 2. The conception of completion Rogun HPP 2009 (Annex 2), Gydroproekt Moscow; 3. Bank Feasibility Study of Rogun HPP, Lamayer LTD 2006. Note: On the issue of the runner and the total weight of hydro turbine: 1. Replaceable runner ­ D =4835 mm, weight - 70 tons, P=200 Mwt ; 2. Permanent runner ­ D = 6000 mm, weight ­ 100 tons P=615 Mwt; 3. Total weight of turbine ­ 1580 tons 51 52 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference Annex 1 16 15 Technical project of production and organization of underground # 561 TP ­ 3 IV ­ works (for underground complex). Explanatory note. 1310 Antifiltration barriers in the dam site and the upper cofferdam. 17 16 Technical project of production and organization of underground # 561 TP ­ 3 IV ­ works (for underground complex). Explanatory note. Motor 2631 transport tunnels to be used during the construction and exploitation period. 18 17 Technical project of production and organization of underground # 561 TP ­ 3 IV ­ works (for underground complex). Explanatory note. Actions on 2906 the protection of salt layer from washing. 19 18 Technical project. Preliminary strengthening of rocks/layers # 561 TP ­ 3 IV ­ during driving of the right ­ bank motor transport tunnels. 9848 Estimation. 20 19 Technical project. Preliminary strengthening of rocks/layers # 561 TP ­ 3 IV ­ during driving the channel rise of hydraulic and saline screen. 9849 Estimate 21 20 Technical project. Preliminary strengthening of rocks/layers. # 561 TP ­ 3 IV ­ Catalogue of unit costs. 9850 22 21 Technical project. Carrying out 35 kV power line from the Volume II. PL ­ 35 ­ flooding area and the external power supply of collective farms 110 kV and settlements of the population under resettlement. Project note and drawing. 23 22 Technical project for the carrying out the connection line from Volume III. Power the reservoir area and the construction of connection line from supply the district centre Childara and Gharm to the new built settlements and collective farms. 52 53 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 24 23 Technical working project. Carrying out the power line of 35 kV from the flooding area. Volume IV ­ Estimate documentation. Book 1 ­ summary estimates and estimation of supplemental construction works. 25 24 Technical working project. Motor road Dushanbe ­ Khorog. On the site of the terminal station Nurekgesstroi ­ Karabulok settlement Volume 1 ­ general part. Book III ­ summary explanatory note, documents for agreements and lists. 26 25 Technical project. Settlement of constructors of Rogun HPP. Rogun settlement. Housing. Book 1 ­ explanatory note. Technical project ­ main Part I. Environmental conditions. 27 28 Book 1. Hydrological conditions. Climate. River operation 1174 ­ T13 regime in project conditions. 29 Book 2. Topographical geodesic study. 1174 ­ T14 28 Part II. Economy. Water industry. Hydro system parameters. Water reservoir. Using the natural resources and protection of environment. 29 33 Book 3. Water reservoir and the tailrace area. 1174 ­ T18, P ­ 18 Part III. Main hydro system building. 30 35 Book 1. Main starting position of the Project. Selection of dam 1174 ­ T20, P ­ 20 site and the scheme of HPP. Assembly of hydro system. 31 36 Hydro system building P ­ 21 ­ 1 32 38 Chapter 2. Activities for the protection of salt layer from 1174 ­ T21 ­ 2 washing. 33 39 Chapter 3. Spillways. Pressure station unit 1174 ­ T21 ­ 3, P ­ 21 ­ 3 34 40 Chapter 4. Mud dam on Obi-Shur range. 1174 ­ T21 ­ 4, P ­ 21 ­ 4 53 54 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 35 42 Chapter 1. Water power and mechanical equipment. 1174 ­ T22 ­ 2 36 43 Chapter 2. Electro technical equipment 1174 ­ T22 ­ 2, P ­ 22 ­ 2 37 44 Book 4. Sanitary engineering 1174 ­ T23, P ­ 23 38 45 Book 5. Fire safety and safeguard activities. 1174 ­ T24 ­ P ­ 24 39 47 Book 7. Special activities 1174 ­ 34 ­ T26 40 48 Book 8. Operational activities of hydro system 1174 ­ T27 41 49 Book 9. Field studies 1174 ­ T28 42 50 Book 10. Settlements 1174 ­ T29, P ­ 29 Part IV. Organization for construction and estimation 43 51 Book 1. Organization for construction 1174 ­ T30, P ­ 30 44 52 Book 2. Production basis. Technological and constructional part. 1174 ­ T31, P ­ 31 45 53 Book 3. Work production 1174 ­ T32, P ­ 32 46 54 Book 4. Summary expenditure and estimation 1174 ­ T33 47 55 Book 5. Object and local estimations. Part A chapters 1-VII, X, 1174 ­ T34 XI, XII 48 56 Book 6. Object and local estimations. Part A chapters VIII and 1174 ­ T35 IX 49 58 Book 8. Catalogue of single district of single valuation, attached 1174 ­ T37 to the conditions of constructions on the salary. 50 59 Book 9. Catalogue of single district of single valuation, attached 1174 ­ T38 to the conditions of constructions on the salary and local constructional materials 51 60 Book 10. Calculation prices for the local materials, collective 1174 ­ T39 52 61 Book 11. Catalogue of estimate prices for the local constructional 1174 ­ T40 material. Annex 53 66 Phased review materials of the project 1174 ­ T45 54 70 Project testing for novelty 1174 ­ T49 54 55 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 55 Annex to the note # 1174 ­ T18 of technical project Water reservoir 56 71 Evacuation of motor way to the direction Kulyab ­ Shugnov ­ 1174 ­ T18 ­ 2.8 Tavildara ­ Gharm ­ Komsomolobod from the reservoir area. Volume II, Parts III, IV. Chapter I, book ­ 8 ­ Plan and grade line on Tavildara ­ Gharm area 57 72 Evacuation of motor way to the direction Kulyab ­Shugnov ­ 1174 ­ T18 ­ 2 A Tavildara ­ Gharm ­ Komsomolobod. Volume IV, Parts XI ­ estimate documentation. Chapter I ­ summary estimation. 58 73 Evacuation of motor way to the direction Kulyab ­ Khovaling ­ 1174 ­ T18 ­ 2.18.3 Shugnov ­ Tavildara ­ Gharm ­ Komsomolobod. Volume IV, Book 18 ­ 3 ­ DRP in Siafark. Drawings 59 74 Evacuation of motor way to the direction Kulyab ­ Khovaling ­ 1174 ­ T18 ­ 2.18.7 Shugnov ­ Tavildara ­ Gharm ­ Komsomolobod from the reservoir area. Volume IV, Book ­ 18 ­ 7 ­ Linear Master House (LMH) in Kurboztanak village. Drawings 60 75 Evacuation of motor way to the direction Kulyab ­ Khovaling ­ 1174 ­ T18 ­ 2.18.9 Shugnov ­ Tavildara ­ Gharm ­ Komsomolobod from the reservoir area. Volume V, book 18 ­ 9 ­ LMH in Degrez village. Drawings 61 76 Evacuation of motor way to the direction Kulyab ­ Khovaling ­ 1174 ­ T18 ­ Shugnov ­ Tavildara ­ Gharm ­ Komsomolobod from the 2.18.11 reservoir area. Volume V, book 18 ­ 15 LMH in Zilalak village. drawings 62 77 Evacuation of motor way to the direction Kulyab ­ Khovaling ­ 1174 ­ T18 ­ Shugnov ­ Tavildara ­ Gharm ­ Komsomolobod from the 2.18.15 reservoir area. Volume V, book 18 ­ 15 ­ LMH in Kalachai Poyon village 63 78 Evacuation of motor way to the direction Kulyab ­ Khovaling ­ 1174 ­ T18 ­ 2.20.1 Shugnov ­ Tavildara ­ Gharm ­ Komsomolobod from the 55 56 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference reservoir area. Volume IV, book 20 ­ 1 ­ Road Maintenance settlement (RMS) in Sangikar. Drawings 64 79 Evacuation of motor way to the direction Kulyab ­ Khovaling ­ 1174 ­ T18 ­ 2.20.3 Shugnov ­ Tavildara ­ Gharm ­ Komsomolobod from the reservoir area. Volume V, book 20 ­ 3 ­ LMH in Shul village. Drawings 65 80 Evacuation of motor way to the direction Kulyab ­ Khovaling ­ 1174 ­ T18 ­ 2.20.5 Shugnov ­ Tavildara ­ Gharm ­ Komsomolobod from the reservoir area. Volume IV, 20 ­ 5 ­ LMH in Shul village. Drawings 66 81 Evacuation of motor way to the direction Kulyab ­ Shugnov ­ 1174 ­ T18 ­ Tavildara ­ Gharm ­ Komsomolobod from the reservoir area. 2.27.20 Volume II, LMH 67 82 Evacuation of motor way to the direction Kulyab ­ Shugnov ­ 1174 ­ T18 ­ Tavildara ­ Gharm ­ Komsomolobod from the reservoir area. 2.27.21 Volume VI, book 27 ­ 6/1.10 ­ LMH Degrez village 68 83 Evacuation of motor way to the direction Kulyab ­ Shugnov ­ 1174 ­ T18 ­ 2.27.3 Tavildara ­ Gharm ­ Komsomolobod from the reservoir area. Volume VI, book 27 ­ 8/1.10 ­ LMH in Degrez village 69 84 Evacuation of motor way to the direction Kulyab ­ Shugnov ­ 1174 ­ T18 ­ 2.27.7 Tavildara ­ Gharm ­ Komsomolobod from the flooding area with reservoir. For the construction of Road Operational Department in Butaikabad village. Volume VI ­ estimate documentation. Chapter I ­ estimation. Book 27 ­ 3/17 ­ land improvement of the enterprise. 70 85 Evacuation of motor way to the direction Kulyab ­ Shugnov ­ 1174 ­ T18 ­ 2.27.8 Tavildara ­ Gharm ­ Komsomolobod from the flooding area with reservoir. For the construction of Road Operational Department in Butaikabad village. Volume VI ­ estimate documentation. Chapter I ­ estimation. Book 27 ­ 3/19a ­ ATS estimation. 56 57 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 71. 86. Kulyab-Shughnow-Tavildara-Gharm-Komsomolobod motor way 1174-T18/2.28.15 retrieving out of dam zone flooding area. For the construction of Road Operational Department in Childara settlement. Volume VI ­ cost estimate documentation. Chapter II ­ cost estimation. Book 28-5/4,5,6 ­ Transformer substation. External electric lighting networks. Installation of radio and communication. 72. 87. Kulyab-Shughnow-Tavildara-Gharm-Komsomolobod motor way 1174-T18-2.28.23 retrieving out of dam zone flooding area. For the construction of Road Operational Department in Childara settlement. Volume VI ­ cost estimate documentation. Chapter II ­ cost estimation. Book 28-5/17 ­ Area improvement of the enterprise. 73. 88. Kulyab-Shughnow -Tavildara-Gharm-Komsomolobod motor 1174-T18-2.28.4 way retrieving out of dam zone flooding area. Volume VI ­ cost estimate documentation. Chapter II ­ cost estimation. Book 28- 4/1.9 ­ LMH in the Ezgand settlement. 74. 89. Kulyab-Shughnow -Tavildara-Gharm-Komsomolobod motor 1174-T18-2.28.6 way retrieving out of dam zone flooding area. For the construction of Road Operational Department in Chil-Dara settlement. Volume VI ­ cost estimate documentation. Chapter II ­ cost estimation. Book 28-5/3,7,8 ­ Car parking building. Entrance-lodge. Auto washing dock. 75. 90. Kulyab-Shughnow -Tavildara-Gharm-Komsomolobod motor 1174-T18-2.28.7 way retrieving out of dam zone flooding area. For the construction of Road Operational Department in Childara settlement. Volume ­ cost estimate documentation. Chapter ­ cost estimation. Book 28-5/24 ­ Water field well in the Childara settlement. 76. 91. Kulyab-Shughnow -Tavildara-Gharm-Komsomolobod motor 1174-T18-2.28.9 way retrieving out of dam zone flooding area. For the construction of RMS in Dashtimur settlement. Volume VI ­ cost 57 58 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference estimate documentation. Chapter II ­ cost estimation. Book 28- 6/4,5,6 ­ Transformer substation. External electric lighting networks. Installation of radio and communication. 77. 92. Kulyab-Shughnow -Tavildara-Gharm-Komsomolobod motor 1174-T18-2.29.15 way retrieving out of dam zone flooding area. For the construction of RMS in Sangikar settlement. Volume VI ­ cost estimate documentation. Part II ­ cost estimation. Book 28- 6/4,5,6 ­ Biological waste water treatment plant. 78. 93. Kulyab-Shughnon -Tavildara-Gharm-Komsomolobod motor way 1174-T18-2.29.16 retrieving out of dam zone flooding area. For the construction of RMS. Volume VI ­ cost estimate documentation. Chapter II ­ cost estimation. Book 29-6/22 ­ Water field well in the site of Sangikar settlement. 79. 94. Kulyab-Shughnow-Tavildara-Gharm-Komsomolobod motor way 1174-T18-2.29.2 retrieving out of dam zone flooding area. Volume VI ­ cost estimate documentation. Chapter II ­ cost estimation. Book 29-2 ­ Bridges. 80. 95. Kulyab-Shughnow -Tavildara-Gharm-Komsomolobod motor 1174-T18-2.29.5 way retrieving out of dam zone flooding area. For the construction of RMS in the Sangikar settlement. Volume VI ­ cost estimate documentation. Chapter II ­ cost estimation. Book 29-6/10 ­ Boiler house with two vessels Universal ­ 6m. 81. 96. Kulyab-Shughnow-Tavildara-Gharm-Komsomolobod motor way 1174-T18-2.29.6 retrieving out of dam zone flooding area. For the construction of RMS in the Sangikar settlement. Volume VI ­ cost estimate documentation. Chapter II ­ cost estimation. Book 28-6/17 - Area improvement of the enterprise. 82. 97. Kulyab-Shughnow-Tavildara-Gharm-Komsomolobod motor way 1174-T18-2.29.8 retrieving out of Roghun HPP zone. Volume VI ­ cost estimate 58 59 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference documentation. Chapter I ­ cost estimation. Book 29-7/1,9 - LMH in the Tagob settlement. 83. 98. Kulyab-Shughnow-Tavildara-Gharm-Komsomolobod motor way 1174-T18-2.30.1 retrieving out of dam zone flooding area. Kulyab ­ Tavildara (motor way) site. Volume IV ­ cost estimate documentation. Chapter II ­ quotation catalogue. Book 30-1. 84. 99. Kulyab-Shughnow-Tavildara-Gharm-Komsomolobod motor way 1174-T18-2.32 retrieving out of dam zone flooding area. Gharm ­ Komsomolobod site. Volume IV ­ cost estimate documentation. Chapter II ­ quotation catalogue. Book 32. 85. 100. Integrated project on lay-out and development of rural population 1174-T18-4.1 aggregate with industrial zones of state farms and collective farms for population, moved out of dam zone flooding area. Book 1. Explanatory note. 86. 101. Project of lay-out and development of rural population aggregate 1174-T18-4.3 with industrial zones of state farms and collective farms for population, moved out of dam zone flooding area. Book 3. Consolidated cost estimation brief and consolidated cost estimations. 87. 102. Project of lay-out and development of rural population aggregate 1174-T18-4.7 with industrial zones of state farms and collective farms for population, moved out of dam zone flooding area. Book 4. Objective and local cost estimations. Objects of communal construction and improvement of Miyonadu collective farm. Central messuage. 88. 103. Hydro geological conclusion about conditions of water supply of 1174-T18-4.13a the designed Tavildara settlement, Roghun collective farm of Komsomolobod district. 89. 104. Development of central messauge of Miyonadu collective farm 1174-T18-4.15 with industrial zones of state farms and collective farms for 59 60 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference population, moved out of dam zone flooding area. Book 5 ­ construction organization. 90. 105. Integrated project on lay-out and development of rural population 1174-T18-4.18 aggregate with industrial zones of state farms and collective farms for population, moved out of dam zone flooding area. Book 8. 91. 105a. Project of lay-out and development of rural population aggregate with industrial zones of state farms and collective farms for population, moved out of dam zone flooding area. Book 7. Amendment on cost of local and carriage materials. 92. 106. Air Line ­ 35 kV retrieving out of dam zone flooding area, 1174-T18-6.11.7 including external power supply of settlements and collective farms for moving population. Volume I ­ Substation 35-110 kV. Part 11 ­ Registered specification on substations. Book 7 ­ registered specification compilation on substation 35/10 kV Tavildara. 93. 107. Air line ­ 35 kV retrieving out of dam zone flooding area, 1174-T18-6.12 including external power supply of settlements and collective farms for moving population. Volume II ­ Air Line ­ 35 110 kV. Part 1 ­ General explanatory note. 94. 108. Air line ­ 35 kV retrieving out of dam zone flooding area. 1174-T18-6.26 Volume IV. Book 2 ­ Objective cost estimations No. 16, 17, 18 on substation construction 110/35/10 kV Tegermi and Childara and on at substation Childora. 95. 109. Air line ­ 35 kV retrieving out of dam zone flooding area. 1174-T18-6.27 Volume IV. Book 3 ­ Objective cost estimations No. 12, 13, 14, 15 on substation construction 35/10 kV Kizrok, Miyonadu Chorsadi and Khufak. 96. 110. Air line ­ 35 kV retrieving out of dam zone flooding area, 1174-T18-6.28 including external power supply of settlements and collective 60 61 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference farms for moving population. Volume IV­ Objective cost estimation No. 19 on reconstruction of substation 35/10 kV Tavildara. 97. 111. Air line ­ 35 kV retrieving out of dam zone flooding area. 1174-T18-6.32 Volume IV ­ Objective cost estimation No. 30 on Air Line construction ­ 10 kV and Transformer Substation for settlements in the newly developed zones. 98. 111a. Communication Line retrieving out of dam zone and construction 1174-T18-5.9 of communication line from district/center Childara and Gharm to newly organized settlements and collective farms. Volume V ­ Cost estimate part. Chapter 4 ­ Local cost estimates on assemblage works on station facility (structures). 99. 112 Irrigation of new lands in return of flooding area. Part II ­ 1174-T18-7.2 Natural conditions. Book 3 ­ Engineering geological and hydrological justification. 100. 116. Irrigation of new lands in return of flooding area. Part III, book 1 ­ Chart of irrigated lands. 101. 118. Vocational school for 720 learning builders ­ hydraulic engineer in the Obi Gharm settlement. Construction organization project. 102. 119. Cost estimation on construction College for 720 learning builders ­ hydraulic engineer in the Obi Gharm settlement. 103. 120. Technical and economic valuation of College for 720 learning builders ­ hydraulic engineer in the Obi Gharm settlement. 104. 121. College for 720 learning builders ­ hydraulic engineer in the Obi Gharm settlement. Field (educational productive) working shops. Volume IV. Chapter B. Secret language 945. 105. 122. College for 720 learning builders ­ hydraulic engineer in the Obi Gharm settlement. Field (educational productive) working shops. Heating and ventilation. Volume VI. Chapter B. Secret language 945. 61 62 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 106. 123. College for 720 learning builders ­ hydraulic engineer in the Obi Gharm settlement. Volume IV. Chapter B. Secret language 945. 107. 124. College for 720 learning builders ­ hydraulic engineer in the Obi Gharm settlement. Water pipe and sewerage system. Volume IV. Chapter B. Secret language 945. 62 63 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference Annex ­ 2 Project number Name Copies I Phase 1 1861-1 book 1 Rogun HPP on Vakhsh river. The conception of the power 4 plant construction completion. Organization of construction. Brief note. 2 1861 -1 book 2 Rogun HPP on Vakhsh river. The conception of the power 4 plant construction completion. Organization of construction. Explanatory note. 3 1861 ­ 1 Album 1 Album of drawings 4 II Phase 4 1861 ­ 2 ­ VII Rogun HPP on Vakhsh river. The conception of the power 4 plant construction completion. Organization of construction. 5 1861 ­ 2 ­ II ­ 2 Rogun HPP on Vakhsh river. The conception of the power 4 plant construction completion. Volume II. Environmental conditions. Book 2. Hydrometereological conditions. 53 pages. 6 1861 ­ 2 ­ II Rogun HPP on Vakhsh river. The conception of the power 4 plant construction completion. Volume III. Water industry 85 p. 7 1861 ­ 2 ­ VI Rogun HPP on Vakhsh river. The conception of the power 4 plant construction completion. Electrical power engineering of Tajikistan. 48 p. 8 1861 ­ 2 ­ V ­ 1 Rogun HPP on Vakhsh river. The conception of the power 4 plant construction completion. Volume V. Hydro engineering complex (power dam). 128 p. 9 1861 ­ 2 ­ VI ­ 2 Rogun HPP on Vakhsh river. The conception of the power 4 plant construction completion. Volume VI. Technological 63 64 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference equipments. Book 1. Electro technical equipment and power distribution. 148 p. 10 1861 ­ VI ­ 3 Rogun HPP on Vakhsh river. The conception of the power 4 plant construction completion. Mechanical equipment and steel constructions. 24 p. 11 1861 ­ 2 ­ VI ­ 4 Rogun HPP on Vakhsh river. The conception of the power 4 plant construction completion. Volume VI. Technological equipment. Engineering system of the power plant. Heating supply. Heating, ventilation and air conditioning. The system of water supply and sewerage. Communications. 33 p. 12 1861 ­ 2 ­ VIII Rogun HPP on Vakhsh river. The conception of the power 4 plant construction completion. Volume VIII. Activities on preparation of reservoir zone. 148 p 13 1861 ­ 2 ­ T.5 Rogun HPP on Vakhsh river. The conception of the power 4 plant construction completion. Main building of hydro system. 182 p. 14 1861 ­ 2 ­ Album Rogun HPP on Vakhsh river. The conception of the power 4 2 plant construction completion. Album of drawings 15 1861 ­ 2 ­ II ­ 1 Rogun HPP on Vakhsh river. The conception of the power 4 plant construction completion. Volume II. Environmental conditions. Book 1. Hydrological and engineering geodesic studies. 17 p. 16 1861 ­ 2 ­ II ­ 3 Rogun HPP on Vakhsh river. The conception of the power 4 plant construction completion. Volume II. Environmental conditions. Book 3. Engineering geological conditions. 92 p. 17 1861 ­ V ­ 3 Rogun HPP on Vakhsh river. The conception of the power 4 plant construction completion. Volume V. Main building of hydro system. Book 3. The program of complex monitoring of Rogun HPP. 59 p. 64 65 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 18 1861 ­ VI ­ 1 Rogun HPP on Vakhsh river. The conception of the power 4 plant construction completion. Technological equipment. Main and auxiliary water power equipment. 75 p. 19 1861 ­ 2 ­ Album Rogun HPP on Vakhsh river. The conception of the power 4 1 plant construction completion. Album of drawings 20 1861 ­ 2 ­ VII ­ A Rogun HPP on Vakhsh river. The conception of the power 4 plant construction completion. Organization of construction. III Phase 21 1861 ­ 2 ­ 1 Rogun HPP on Vakhsh river. The conception of the power 4 plant construction completion. General note. 22 1861 ­ 2 ­ 10 Rogun HPP on Vakhsh river. The conception of the power 4 plant construction completion. Estimate cost of the construction. 65 66 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference Annex 3. Information of Lamayer documentation located in Open Stock Company RoghunGESstroy 1. Detailed evaluation of existing facility and equipment. Part 3 from 8. (book 1 from 5) (book 2 from 5) (book 3 from 5) (book 4 from 5) (book 5 from 5) 2. Detailed evaluation of existing facility and equipment. Part 2 from 8. (book 1) (book 2) (book 6 from 8) (book 7 from 8) (book 8 from 8) 3. Detailed evaluation of existing facility and equipment. Part 4 from 8. (book 1 from 10) (book 2 from 10) (book 3 from 10) (book 4 from 10) (book 5 from 10) 66 67 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference (book 6 from 10) (book 7 from 10) (book 8 from 10) (book 9 from 10) (book 10 from 10) 4. Volume 2 Basic Report 5. Volume 3F Project parameters. 67 68 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference - , , . «» : 1. 1978. ( 1); 2. 2009 . ( 2); 3. , 2006 . : i. ­D = 4835 , = 70 , = 200 ; 2. ­ D = 6000 , = 100 , =615 . 3. - 1580 . 68 69 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 1 16. 15. 561--3-IV- . . 1310 . 17. 16. 561--3-VII- . . 2631 . IS. 17. 561--3- . . VIII2906 . 19. 18. . 561 -3- VII - . 9848 20. 19. . 561 -3-VIII- . 9849 . 21. 20. . . 561 -3-VII- . 9850. 22. 21. . B-35 II. -35-110 . / . 23. 22. III. / - . . 69 70 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 24. 23. - . -35 . IV- . I - -. 24. - . -, - .. 25. I - . III -- . . 26. 1 25. . . . . I - . - I. 27. 28. I. . . 1174-13 29. 2. -c c 1174-T14 28. II. . . . . 29. ii. . 3. 1174-18, -18 . 30. 35. 1. . 1174-T20, -20 . . 31. 36. -21-1 32. 38. 2. . 1174-21-2 70 71 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 33. 39. 3. . - 1174-21-3, -21-3 . 34. 40. 4. - 1174-21-4, -21-4 35. 42. 1. 1174-22-2 36. 43. 2. 1174-T22-2, -22-2 37. 44. 4. 74-23, -23 38. 45. 5. 1174-24, -24 39. 47. 7. 1174-34-26 40. 48. 8. 1174-27 41. 49. 9. 1174-28 42. 50. 10. 1174-29, -29 IV. 43. 51. 1. 1174-30, -30 44. 52. 2. . 74-31, -31 45. 53. 3. 74-32, -32 46. 54. 4. 1174-33 71 72 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 47. 55. 5. . «» I- 1174-34 VII, X, XI, XII 48. 56. 6. . «», VIII IX 1174-35 49. 58. 8. , 1174-37 50. 59. 9. , 1174-38 51. 60. 10. , 1174-39 - (, , , ) 52. 61. 11. 1174-40 53. 66. 5. 1174-45 54. 70. 9. 1174-49 55. 1174-18 «» 56. 71. - - 1174-18-2.8 - - - . II. III, IV. I. 8 - - - 57. 72. - - 1174-18-2 - - - -. IV, XI - . 1 - . 72 73 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 58. 73. - - 1174-18-2.18.3 - - - . IV. 18-3 - . 59. 74. . --- 1174-18-2.18.7 --- - . IV, 18-7 - - . . 60. 75. 1174-T18-2.18.9 ------ . V, 18-9 - . . 61. 76. 1174-T18-2.18.11 ------- . V, 18-11 - . . 62. 77. 1174-18-2.18.15 -- ---- . V. 18-15 - . . 63. 78. - 1174-18-2.20.1 ---- - . IV, 20-1 - . . 73 74 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 64. 79. 1174-18-2.20.3 ---- -- . V. 20-3 \. . 65. 80. 1174-18-2.20.5 ------ . IV, 20-5 - . . 66. 81. - 1174-18-2.27.20 ---- . VI, 27-6/1.10- . 67. 82. - 1174-18-2.27.21 ----- . VI, 27-8/1.10 - . 68. 83. . 1174-T18-2.27.3 . ( 1). 69. 84. - 1174-18-2.27.7 ---- . . VI - . I - . 27-3. 17 - . 70. 85. -- 1174T18-2.27.8 ---- . - . VI - . 1- 27-3. 19- . 74 75 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 71. 86. - 1174-18/2.28.15 ---- . - . VI - . II - . 28-5.4. 5. 6 - . . . 72. 87. - 1174-18-2.28.23 ---- . -. VI - . II - . 28-5/17 - . 73. 88. - 1174-18-2.28.4 ------ . VI - . I - . 28-4 1) - . 74. 89. - 1174-18-2.28.6 ---- . - - . VI - . II -. 28-5/3, 7, 8 - . . . 75. 90. - 1174-18-2.28.7 ---- . - - . -. 28-5/24 - .. 75 76 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 76. 91. -- 1174-18-2.28.9 --- - . - . VI - . -- . 28-6/4, 5 , 6 - . . . 77. 92. -- 1174-18-2.29.15 ---- - . - . VI. I - . -. 28- 6/18 -- . 78. 93. -- 1174-18-2.29.16 ---- . . VI - . II - . 29-6/22 - . 79. 94. - 1174-18-2.29.2 ---- . VI - . II - . 29-2 - . 80. 95. - 1174-18-2.29.5 ---- - . - . VI - . 29-6/10 - «» - 6. 76 77 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 81. 96. - 1174-18-2.29.6 ---- - . - . VI - . - . 28-6/47 - . 82. 97. -- 1174-18-2.29.8 ------ - . VI - . I - . 29-7/1,9 - . 83. 98. - 1174-18-2.30 - ----- . - - (/). IV- . II -- . 30-1. 84. 99. - 1174-18-2.32 - --- . * - . IV- . II- . 32. 85. 100. 1174-18-4.1 , . 1. . 86. 101. 1174-18-4.3 , . 3. . 77 78 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 87. 102. 1174-18-4.7 . . 4. . - «». . 88. 103. 1174-18-4.13 - «» . 89. 104. «» 1174-18-4.15 , . 5 - . 90. 105. 1174-18-48 , . 8. 91. 105 . , . 7. . 92. 106. -35 , 1174-18-6..7 . I - 35-1 10 . 11- . 7 - / 35/10 «- ». 78 79 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 93. 107. -35 1174-18-6.12 . . II - -35-110 . I- . 94. 108. -35 . IV. 1174-18-6.26 2 - 16. 17. 18 - / 1 10/35/10 «» «» / «». 95. 109. -35 . IV. 1I74-T18-6.27 3 - 12. 13. 14. 15 - / 35/10 «», «», «», «». 96. 110. -35 , 1174-18-6.28 . IV, 4 - ( 19 / 35/10 «-». 97. 111. -35 . IV - 1174-18-6.32 . 8 - 30 -110 . 98. 111a 1174--18-5.9 . . . V- . 4- . 99. 112. 1174-18-7.2 . II- . 3 -- - . 79 80 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 100. 116. . III. I - . 101. 118. - 720 - -. . 102. 119. 720 - -. 103. 120. - 720 - -. 104. 121. 720 - -. - . IV. . 945. 105. 122. 720 - -. - . . VI. . 945. 106. 123. 720 - -. IV. . 945. 107. 124. 720 - -. . IV. . 945. 80 81 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 2 . 1 1 1861-1-KH.I . . 4 . . 2 1861-1-.2 . . 4 . . 3 1861-1- 1 4 II 4 1861-2-VII . , 4 . . 5 1861-2-II-2 . . . 4 II. . 2. . 53 . 6 1861-2-III . . . 4 III. . 85 . 7 1861-2-IV . . . 4 . 48 . 8 1861-2-V-1 . . . 4 V. 1. " " 128 . 81 82 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 9 1861-2-VI-2 . . . 4 VI. 1. . 10 1861-VI-3 148 . . . 4 . . 24 . 11 1861-2-VI-4 . . . 4 VI. . . . , . . . 33 . 12 1861-2-VIII . . . 4 VIII. . 148 . 13 1861-2-T.5 . . . 4 . 182 . 14 1861-2- 2 . . . 4 . IS 1861-2-II-1 . . . 4 II. . 1. - . 17 . 16 1861-2-II-3 . . . 4 II. . 3. - . 92 . 17 1861-V-3 . . . 4 V. . 3. . 59 .. 82 83 Section 5 ­ Terms of Reference 18 1861-VI-1 . . . 4 . . 75 . 19 1861-2- 1 . . . 4 . 20 1861-2-VII-A . . 4 . . Ill 21 1861-2-10 . . . 4 22 1861-2-10 , . . 4 1 . 83 84 S 3 «» «» 1. 3 8 ( 1 5) ( 2 5) ( 3 5) ( 4 5) ( 5 5) 2. . 2 8. . 5 8 ( 1) ( 2) ( 6 8) ( 7 8) ( 8 8) 3. 4 8 ( 1 10) ( 2 10) ( 3 10) ( 4 10) ( 5 10) ( 6 10) ( 7 10) ( 8 10) 84 | P a g e 85 IV. Appendices ( 9 10) ( 10 10) 4. 2 « » 5. 3F « »