Second Municipal Development Report No: ; Type: Report/Evaluation Memorandum ; Country: Philippines; Region: East Asia And Pacific; Sector: Urban Management; Major Sector: Urban Development; ProjectID: P004573 The Philippines Second Municipal Development Project, supported by Loan 3146-PH for US$ 40 million equivalent, was approved in FY90. The Loan was closed in FY97 as scheduled. The Implementation Completion Report (ICR) was prepared by the East Asia and Pacific Regional Office. A summary of the Borrower’s report is included in Appendix B. The project objectives were: (i) to assist local government units (LGUs) in Metro Manila and the surrounding provinces to provide basic infrastructure services, especially to lower income communities; (ii) to improve LGUs’ capacities for planning, financing, and implementing investments; and (iii) to expand the coverage of the Municipal Development Fund (MDF) to include all LGUs in the Philippines. These objectives were to be achieved through: (a) on-lending to LGUs for financing basic infrastructure investments, public facilities such as public markets and slaughterhouses, and maintenance equipment; (b) local resource mobilization through the Real Property Tax Administration (RPTA) programs for tax collection efficiency; and (c) technical assistance to the main national implementing agencies such as Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) and Department of finance (DOF). The project achieved most of its objectives. The physical and institutional objectives were successfully achieved, but the third objective of expanding the coverage of MDF to all LGUs in the country turned out to be too ambitious. Thirty five LGUs, including many low income communities, took out loans to finance various sub-projects. The majority of the sub-projects were revenue-generating facilities such as public markets (30 LGUs) and slaughterhouses (4 LGUs). Other sub-projects included roads, drainage, and maintenance equipment. The public market sub-projects improved the markets’ sanitary facilities, and significantly contributed to the revenue of the LGUs. Eighty seven LGUs participated in the RPTA program. Their tax base increased by 30.4 percent and the total assessed property value increased by 2.4 times. The Central Project Office of the DPWH established itself as a capable project implementation agency and acted as a technical intermediary to assist LGUs in sub- project preparation and implementation. The MDF successfully performed as an intermediary to provide LGUs with direct access to long-term investment finance. Institutional development impact on LGUs was also substantial. The LGUs had hands-on experiences of investment planning, procurement, contract supervision, and operations of basic municipal services. The Economic Rate of Return for selected sub- projects at completion ranged from 13 to 29 percent , higher than the appraisal estimates of 13 to 21 percent. OED rates project outcome as satisfactory, institutional development as substantial, sustainability as likely, and Bank performance as satisfactory. The above ratings are consistent with those indicated in the ICR, and were confirmed by the Performance Audit Report issued in June 1997 on a cluster of projects including this one. The main lesson is that the size and complexity of sub-projects should be compatible with the technical capacity and financial resources of institutional borrowers, in this case LGUs. The participating LGUs started with simple revenue-generating projects which presented minimum risks for cost recovery and prepared themselves for more complex projects to be financed in the future. The ICR is rated as satisfactory. The project was audited (see above).