Page 1 1 INTEGRATED SAFEGUARDS DATA SHEET CONCEPT STAGE Report No.: AC1051 Date ISDS Prepared/Updated: February 02, 2005 I. BASIC INFORMATION A. Basic Project Data Country: Mauritania Project ID: P087670 IDA Base Project ID: P081368 Project Name: Community-Based Watershed Management Project (GEF) Task Team Leader: Ismael Ouedraogo GEF Focal Area: Land degradation Global Supplemental ID: P087670 Estimated Appraisal Date: March 21, 2005 Estimated Board Date: October 28, 2005 Managing Unit: AFTS4 Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Sector: Environment & Natural Resources Management (100%) Theme: Land management (P);Decentralization (S);Participation and civic engagement (S) Safeguard Policies Specialists in the task team: Amadou Konare Loan/Credit amount ($m.): 0.0 Other financing amounts by source: ($m) GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY 6 B. Project Approach: GEF Supplemental for IDA Baseline Project The proposed GEF-funded project will, once prepared, be blended with the IDA-funded Community Based Rural Development Project (CBRDP, P081368), the baseline project, which has already been approved by the Board of the Bank and became effective in September 2004. The project will have the same beneficiaries as the CBRDP, will focus its attention on land management at watershed and landscape levels, and will be implemented using the same implementation arrangement as the base project. The baseline project has already prepared and disclosed its own Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF), as well as its Pest Management Plan (PMP) and its Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF), all of which will be used in implementing this GEF supplemental project. C. Project Objectives [from section 2 of PCN] The development objective of the project is to improve the capacity and enabling environment of rural local governments (communes) and village communities to plan, implement and adopt sustainable land and water management investments and practices at the landscape and watershed levels in the project areas across Mauritania. The global environment objective of the project is to contribute to the strategic objectives of GEF OP15 and OP1 by introducing sustainable land management practices at the village and Page 2 2 regional levels to reduce the rates of land degradation, desertification, and loss of biodiversity in the project areas across Mauritania. D. Project Description [from section 3 of PCN] The project is designed to achieve its objectives through the incremental support of GEF to each one of the three components of the IDA-funded base CBRD project. Three options were considered: separated/associated operations, blended operation and an APL. The option of separated/associated operations was rejected in favor of a blended operation, because the latter offers better synergies with the CBRD. When approved, although after the CBRD, the project will be considered blended with the CBRD, as it will be implemented by the same CBRD implementing agency, using the very same implementation arrangements for greater cost effectiveness and efficiency. The APL option was also rejected for lack of commitment by both GEF and IDA. The GEF operation, as the CBRD, is designed as Sector Investment Operation and both will close about the same time, given the six year duration for the CBRD and the five year duration for this GEF incremental operation. The project include three components: Component A: Capacity Building ($2 millions) . This component aims at developing local and regional capacity building to adapt and replicate new watershed/landscape management approaches and institutions. This will be piloted in two main Mauritanian ecosystems for later scale up to other regions. The component support the following activities: · Development of watershed and landscape management decision support tools to assist communities and local government in their local development planning process, with a focus on the optimization of land use, natural resources conservation in general and the prevention of land degradation in particular, while maximizing socio-economic objectives. The tools include GIS-NRM databases of watersheds and GIS-based indicative watershed master management plans (Shémas directeurs d’aménagements ). · Establishment and strengthening of capacity of watershed and landscape management decision making institutions at both the geographical and socio-political levels, such as watershed/landscape stakeholders associations or committees, and micro-catchments community-based organizations. · Strengthening the capacity of national and local research, extension services and producers associations to adopt a watershed/landscape management approach in developing and transferring sustainable land management technologies. · Training village communities, rural communes, NGOs, and regional planners on how to develop, implement and monitor watershed and/or landscape management plans; · Development of communication tools for sensitizing communities on land degradation issues (e.g., tours to witness disastrous consequences of land degradation). · Review of policies, laws, regulations to identify reforms to provide adequate incentives (such as improved tenure security, conflict resolution systems) to rural communities for the sustainable management of land resources at the watershed and landscape levels. Component B: Local Investment Fund ($3 million) This component aims at supporting local investments proposed in the community development plans (CDP) that include the application of Page 3 3 new, innovative SLM technologies, at the watershed (regional or inter-village) and lower (village community) level. It comprises two matching-grant funds: (i) a village community investment fund, which will finance demonstration and adoption of innovative and sustainable land management (SLM) investments at the village community level (ADC), to help communities bear the financial risk of testing and adopting innovative SLM technologies; and (ii) an inter- village community investment fund, which will finance inter-village SLM investments selected by village communities from their micro-watershed or landscape management master plans, with a focus on interventions which improve or conserve critical ecosystem functions while ensuring the sustainability of local livelihoods. Contributions of communities will not exceed 5% of total investment. Possible activities to be financed include: At the ADC level: · Investment in innovative conservation agriculture (CA) technologies, such as no- tillage/cover crops and agro-forestry, that can minimize land degradation, including initial investment in the production of the seeds of cover crops; · Scaled-up investments in new SLM technologies and activities developed by the GEF- funded Desert Margin Program, such as sand trapping trees; · Investment in renewable energy production techniques, such as production of natural gas from cattle dung, household refuses, compost pits; solar energy-based electrification to minimize deforestation, etc. (if assessed as feasible during preparation). At the inter-community level: · Upstream and river bank protection investments to minimize erosion, and sediment transport in the watersheds; · Cattle routes, cattle wells and pasture investments; and · Inter-village forest management investments. Component C: Project management and M&E ($1 million) . This component will focus on designing and implementing community and scientific M&E systems to monitor global and local environment indicators to assess their impact (desertification/land degradation, carbon sequestration, biodiversity, international waters, climate change) in project areas. The GEF component will focus on specific activities such as: · Establishment of a GIS database for monitoring trends in natural resources and land degradation; · Development of community-based and scientific monitoring and evaluation system (with indicators that can be monitored by communities and scientific indicators) for land degradation and watershed management assessment at the local and regional levels; and local and global environmental impact assessment. E. Project location (if known) Potential pilot sites for the preparatory phase (PUFF-B activities) have already been identified in one oasis and in one agro-salvo pastoral ecosystem (Darkled Nouadhibou and Guidimakha). Within these areas three potential watersheds have been identified based on the following criteria: (i) type and extent of degradation; (ii) zones of interventions with the IDA projects; and (iii) current threats to ecosystem health (see attached map in annex). The methodological approach developed during the preparatory pilot phase will be applied within the CBRD Page 4 4 intervention area during the project implementation period. It may also be applied outside the CBRD intervention area where necessary and appropriate. The CBRD area where this project will be implemented covers about 1,000 village communities in 80 communes located in 9 regions of Mauritania already covered by the predecessor project (RNRMP): Hodh El Charghi, Hodh El Gharbi, Assaba, Gorgol, Guidimakha, Tagant, Adrar, Tiris Zemmour, Inchiri. The exact locations of the communes and villages are not known at present. Detail information on environment characteristics will be obtained during preparation. The proposed project would not impact on cultural property. Where there is a possibility that project activities would encroach on these areas, project activities would be diverted to ensure that these culturally and socially sensitive areas are avoided. F. Borrower’s Institutional Capacity for Safeguard Policies [from PCN] The CBRD Central Coordinating Unit (CCU) under the Ministry of Rural Development and Environment (MDRE) will be responsible for the overall management of the GEF project. It will coordinate activities among the various agencies and institutions to be involved in the implementation of the project. The CCU has received and will continue to receive training to implement Bank Safeguard issues identified in the Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF), Pest Management Plan (PMP), and Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) during preparation of the CBRD. The CBRD has built greater awareness of safeguard issues in Mauritania, where all Bank Safeguard documents are now publicly discussed before publication. The MDRE includes Departments and Agencies dealing with Rural Environment, plant protection and pest management, agricultural research and extension. These units are the target of capacity building by the two IDA-financed rural operations (PDIAIM and CBRD). The GEF will contribute to further strengthen these departments and agencies, as well as that of the direct beneficiaries. II. SAFEGUARD POLICIES THAT MIGHT APPLY Applicable? Safeguard Policy If Applicable, How Might It Apply? [x] Environmental Assessment ( OP / BP 4.01) Certain environmental safeguards may be triggered by the micro and meso sub-projects (e.g., construction of livestock wells, river protection schemes; land restoration schemes;) if they are not adequately screened prior to funding agreements with communities.. An Environmental and Social Assessment of project activities has already been carried out for the base project, which activities are not fundamentally different from the activities to be carried out under this GEF supplemental project, only the level of decision making will differ (inter-community, above the village). Therefore it is envisaged that the Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) of the base project, which has already been approved and disclosed will apply. It will be disclosed again with specific reference to this project. [ ] Natural Habitats ( OP / BP 4.04) Watershed and landscape management plans, and the derived local development plans (CDPs) will normally ensure that natural habitats are protected, restored, or managed and used in a sustainable manner. Therefore Natural Habitats is not expected to be triggered by this project. [ x] Pest Management ( OP 4.09 ) Page 5 5 Pest Management, may be triggered if the project allows for the creation of water bodies that would increase the number of pests and, therefore, disease such as malaria or bilharzias, or if the project funds herbicides for conservation agriculture (CA) practices to improve agricultural production. A Pest Management Plan (PMP) was prepared, approved and disclosed for the base IDA project (CBRD) that will apply to the present GEF supplemental project as well, since the beneficiaries are the same communities. It will be disclosed again with specific reference to this project. [x] Involuntary Resettlement ( OP / BP 4.12) Involuntary Resettlement may be triggered because land management master plans may suggest involuntary resettlement. Land acquired for public and other project activities may cause individuals or community groups to lose assets, or access to assets, or proceeds of economic activities. To mitigate resettlement risks a Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) has been prepared, cleared and disclosed for the base CBRD project. It will apply to this GEF supplemental project since the resettlement risks are similar and concern the same rural communities. It will be disclosed again with specific reference to this project. [ ] Indigenous Peoples ( OD 4.20 ) Not Applicable [ ] Forests ( OP / BP 4.36) Not Applicable [ ] Safety of Dams ( OP / BP 4.37) Not Applicable [ ] Cultural Property (draft OP 4.11 - OPN 11.03 ) Not Applicable [ ] Projects in Disputed Areas ( OP / BP / GP 7.60) * Not Applicable [ ] Projects on International Waterways ( OP / BP / GP 7.50) Not Applicable Environmental Assessment Category: B (partial assessment) [ ] A [X] B [ ] C [ ] FI [ ] TBD III. SAFEGUARD PREPARATION PLAN A. Target date for the Quality Enhancement Review (QER), at which time the PAD-stage ISDS would be prepared. 05/10/2005 B. For simple projects that will not require a QER, the target date for preparing the PAD-stage ISDS : Not Applicable * By supporting the proposed project, the Bank does not intend to prejudice the final determination of the parties' claims on the disputed areas Page 6 6 C. Time frame for launching and completing the safeguard-related studies that may be needed. The specific studies and their timing 1 should be specified in the PAD-stage ISDS : The required safeguard documents will be re-disclosed in the country and at the Infoshop prior to Appraisal. IV. APPROVALS Signed and submitted by: Task Team Leader: Ismael Ouedraogo Date Approved by: Regional Safeguards Coordinator: Tom Walton Date Comments Sector Manager: Mary Barton-Dock Date Comments 1 Reminder: The Bank's Disclosure Policy requires that safeguard-related documents be disclosed before appraisal (i) at the InfoShop and (ii) in-country, at publicly accessible locations and in a form and language that are accessible to potentially affected persons. Page 7 7