7KH /RJIUDPH +DQGERRN $ /RJLFDO )UDPHZRUN $SSURDFK WR 3URMHFW &\FOH 0DQDJHPHQW 7KH :RUOG %DQN + 6WUHHW 1: :DVKLQJWRQ '& 86$ 7$%/( 2) &217(176 Table of Contents ..............................................................................................................................................3 The Logical Framework.....................................................................................................................................5 Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................1 Organization of the Handbook ..........................................................................................................................3 The CAS, CDF & the Portfolio ..........................................................................................................................7 Primacy of Point-of-View...................................................................................................................................9 Logical Framework ..........................................................................................................................................13 CAS Goal .........................................................................................................................................................19 Development Objective ...................................................................................................................................21 Outputs.............................................................................................................................................................25 Component Activities.......................................................................................................................................33 Performance Indicators ...................................................................................................................................37 Monitoring & Evaluation ..................................................................................................................................49 Assumptions and Risks ...................................................................................................................................53 Manageable Interest........................................................................................................................................63 Adaptable Lending: APL & LIL........................................................................................................................67 Design Quality Review ....................................................................................................................................75 The Structural Adjustment Loan .....................................................................................................................79 Logframe Tips ..................................................................................................................................................81 Sample Logframes...........................................................................................................................................85 7KH /RJIUDPH +DQGERRN ZDV FUHDWHG E\ 7HDP 7HFKQRORJLHV ,QF RI 0LGGOHEXUJ 9LUJLQLD ZZZWHDPXVDFRP LQ FRRSHUDWLRQ ZLWK 2SHUDWLRQV &RUH 6HUYLFHV 7+( /2*,&$/ )5$0(:25. 6 KH /RJLFDO )UDPHZRUN LV WKH FRUH UHIHUHQFH GRFXPHQW WKURXJKRXW WKH HQWLUH SURMHFW PDQDJHPHQW F\FOH Design Design Performance Cause & Effect Learning System Assumptions Indicators Goal Purpose Outputs Activities Evaluation Implementation Evaluation Implementa ion Monitoring Monitoring · %DVHG RQ LQWHUQDWLRQDO VWDQGDUGV PHWKRGV DQG WHUPLQRORJ\ · 3URPRWHV FROODERUDWLRQ DQG RZQHUVKLS · 3URGXFHV REMHFWLYHGULYHQ FOLHQWFHQWHUHG GHVLJQV · ,PSURYHV FDXVDO ORJLF · $VVXPHV SURMHFWV DUH D OHDUQLQJ SURFHVV · ,QWHJUDWHV SURMHFWV ZLWK SURJUDP DQG VWUDWHJ\ )25(:25' 6 KH /RJLFDO )UDPHZRUN /RJIUDPH KDV EHHQ LQ XVH DW WKH :RUOG %DQN VLQFH $XJXVW ZKHQ LW EHFDPH D VWDQGDUG DWWDFKPHQW WR WKH 3URMHFW $SSUDLVDO 'RFXPHQW IRU LQYHVWPHQW RSHUDWLRQV &UHDWHG LQ IRU WKH 86 $JHQF\ IRU ,QWHUQDWLRQDO 'HYHORSPHQW LW ZDV XVHG ZLGHO\ WKURXJKRXW WKH ELODWHUDO GRQRU FRPPXQLW\ LQ WKH ·V DQG ·V 3UDFWLWLRQHUV LQ PRVW GHYHORSPHQW PDQDJHPHQW RUJDQL]DWLRQV KDYH H[SORUHG WKH SRZHU RI WKH /RJIUDPH WR FUHDWH FOHDU REMHFWLYHV DQG EXLOG FRPPLWPHQW DQG RZQHUVKLS DPRQJ FOLHQWV 2YHU WKH \HDUV WKH /RJIUDPH HYROYHG DV D FRUH WHFKQLTXH IRU PDQDJLQJ WKH FRPSOHWH SURMHFW F\FOH IURP GHVLJQ WR LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ PRQLWRULQJ DQG HYDOXDWLRQ )RU PRVW RI WKH %DQN·V SURMHFW GRFXPHQWV WKH EDVLF /RJIUDPH PDWUL[ LV IRXQG LQ $QQH[ 7KLV KDQGERRN VXPPDUL]HV WKH UDWLRQDOH DQG HVVHQWLDO HOHPHQWV RI WKH /RJIUDPH IRU SUDFWLWLRQHUV :KLOH SURYLGLQJ JXLGHOLQHV IRU :RUOG %DQN XVDJH WKH +DQGERRN LV JHQHULF HQRXJK IRU XVH E\ FOLHQWV DQG FRQVXOWDQWV +RZHYHU VRPH %DQN WHUPLQRORJ\ PD\ YDU\ IURP JHQHUDO XVDJH :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN 25*$1,=$7,21 2) 7+( +$1'%22. 7KH +DQGERRN LV RUJDQL]HG DV D VWHSE\VWHS XVHU·V UHVRXUFH JXLGH How to Design a Project (Logframe) $Q LQWURGXFWLRQ RI WKH /RJIUDPH PDWUL[ KLJKOLJKWLQJ WKH NH\ IHDWXUHV ³ WKH FDXVDO ORJLF SRLQWRIYLHZ VWURQJ LPSDFW VWDWHPHQW FOLHQWFHQWHUHG GHVLJQ V\VWHPVEDVHG LQWHUYHQWLRQ VWUDWHJLHV SHUIRUPDQFH LQGLFDWRUV WKH SURMHFW OHDUQLQJ V\VWHP ULVN DVVHVVPHQW DQG PLWLJDWLRQ DFFRXQWDELOLW\ Design Quality Checklist $ SUDFWLFDO DSSURDFK WR SURMHFW GHVLJQ TXDOLW\ EDVHG RQ WKH %DQN·V 4XDOLW\ RI (QWU\ LQVWUXPHQW DQG D /RJIUDPH FKHFNOLVW Adaptable Lending & Adjustment Lending 7KLV VHFWLRQ GHPRQVWUDWHV WKH XVH RI WKH /RJIUDPH ZLWK GLIIHUHQW %DQN ORDQ LQVWUXPHQWV $GDSWDEOH 3URJUDP /RDQV $3/ /HDUQLQJ ,QQRYDWLRQ /RDQV /,/ +LJK ,PSDFW $GMXVWPHQW /RDQV +,$/ Tips for PCM/LFA 7KLV VHFWLRQ VXPPDUL]HV VHYHUDO YDOXDEOH WLSV DQG SURYLGHV VSHFLILF UHIHUHQFHV IRU ILQGLQJ KHOS LQ WKH PDQXDO Sample Project Designs $ VHW RI VDPSOH GHVLJQV E\ VHFWRU DQG W\SH :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN ´&/($5 2%-(&7,9(6 $1' 67$.(+2/'(5 &200,70(17 '5,9( 68&&(66)8/ 352-(&76µ :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN 7+( &$6 &') 7+( 3257)2/,2 ) LYHQ WKH FRQWLQXHG VFDUFLW\ RI UHVRXUFHV DPRQJ %RUURZHUV WKH QHHG IRU HTXLWDEOH XVH RI JRYHUQPHQW IXQGV DQG WKH KLJKO\ XQFHUWDLQ HQYLURQPHQWV LQ ZKLFK SURMHFWV DUH XQGHUWDNHQ XVH D FRQYHUJHQW PRGHO DV WKH EDVLV IRU VWUDWHJLF DQG SURJUDP SODQQLQJ %HJLQ DW WKH HQG ZLWK WKH RYHUDOO UHVXOWV GHVLUHG E\ VWDNHKROGHUV DQG WKHQ ZRUN EDFNZDUG FDXVDOO\ $ FRQYHUJHQW PRGHO GHYHORSV FDXVDOLW\ GHGXFWLYHO\ IURP D GHVLUHG VHW RI VWUDWHJLF RXWFRPHV DQG WHQGV WR SURPRWH GHPDQG UHVSRQVLYH DQDO\VLV $ GLYHUJHQW PRGHO GHYHORSV LW FDXVDO ORJLF LQGXFWLYHO\ IURP D VHW RI LQWHUYHQWLRQV DQG WHQGV WR SURPRWH VXSSO\VLGH DQDO\VLV %RWK NLQGV RI DQDO\VLV DUH HVVHQWLDO WR GHYHORSLQJ D TXDOLW\ SURMHFW SRUWIROLR Convergent Model Divergent Model :KHQ XVHG FROODERUDWLYHO\ DPRQJ %DQN %RUURZHU DQG VWDNHKROGHUV WKH 5HVXOWV )UDPHZRUN PHWKRG EDVHG RQ WKH XVH RI D FRQYHUJHQW PRGHO JHQHUDWHV D VWUDWHJLF DQG SURJUDP IUDPHZRUN ZKLFK FDQ FDSWXUH WKH GHVLJQ RI WKH &RPSUHKHQVLYH 'HYHORSPHQW )UDPHZRUN &') DQG GHILQH WKH %DQN·V &RXQWU\ $VVLVWDQFH 6WUDWHJ\ &$6 8VH WKLV DSSURDFK WR EXLOG D SRUWIROLR RI SURMHFWV JURXQGHG LQ VWUDWHJ\ WKDW LV GHPDQG GULYHQ FOLHQWFHQWHUHG DQG EDVHG RQ WKH UHVRXUFHV QHFHVVDU\ WR SURGXFH UHVXOWV DV ZHOO DV WKH FDSDFLW\ QHHGHG WR LPSOHPHQW WKH SURMHFWV :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN 'HYHORS D 5HVXOWV )UDPHZRUN IRU WKH &$6 %HJLQ ZLWK ´3RYHUW\ 5HGXFWLRQµ DQG ZRUN \RXU ZD\ GRZQ LQWR VWUDWHJ\ DQG SURJUDP Poverty Poverty reduction reduction Rapid growth Rapid growth rates rates maintained maintained Stable Good Agricultural Accessible Accessible External debt External debt Gender-based Environmental Stable Good Agricultural Accessible Accessible External debt External debt Gender-based Environmental economic economic governance / governance / growth growth quality health quality health quality quality burden burden burden burden affirmative affirmative management management foundation anti-corruption mechanisms services education stabilized stabilized action improved foundation anti-corruption mechanisms services education stabilized stabilized action improved established / security implemented delivered delivered strategies established / security implemented delivered delivered strategies (PEAP 1) mechanisms implemented (PEAP 1) mechanisms implemented Financial Financial Government Government sector sector decentral. decentral. regulated and regulated and policy policy stabilized stabilized implemented implemented Export Export growth growth mechanisms mechanisms implemented implemented Private Private investment investment stimulated stimulated 35,0$&< 2) 32,172)9,(: # OO SURMHFWV LQ D FRXQWU\ VWUDWHJ\ VKRXOG EH DOLJQHG ZLWK WKH &') DQG &$6 7KH &') DQG &$6 5HVXOWV )UDPHZRUN PD\ KDYH VHYHUDO OHYHOV tcej Pro 7KH 5HVXOWV )UDPHZRUN SURYLGHV WKH FDXVDO ORJLF IRU WKH ILUVW FROXPQ RI WKH /RJIUDPH TryrpÃ6yrhvr 7vyq GtAS6H@ Results Hierarchy Goal Purpose Outputs Activities 7KH ILUVW VWHS LQ XVLQJ WKH /RJIUDPH LV WR LGHQWLI\ WKH DSSURSULDWH OHYHO IRU WKH SURMHFW \RX DUH GHVLJQLQJ :H FDOO WKLV 3RLQW RI 9LHZ 3RLQW RI 9LHZ LV UHODWLYH ZLWK UHJDUG WR WKH 5HVXOWV :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN )UDPHZRUN 8VH SRLQW RI YLHZ DV WKH EDVLV IRU DJUHHLQJ RQ WKH GHILQLWLRQ RI LPSDFW WKH 'HYHORSPHQW 2EMHFWLYH DQG GHILQLQJ FOHDU UROHV DQG UHVSRQVLELOLWLHV WKH 2XWSXWV 3RLQW RI YLHZ EHJLQV ZLWK WKH TXHVWLRQ :KRVH SURMHFW LV WKLV" (YHU\ HQGHDYRU LV IURP VRPHRQH·V SRLQW RI YLHZ %\ GHILQLWLRQ 3RLQW RI 9LHZ LV WKDW RI WKH LPSOHPHQWLQJ JURXS 7KLV FRXOG EH D JRYHUQPHQW PLQLVWU\ ORFDO 1*2·V DQG FRPPXQLW\EDVHG SDUWQHUV RU FRPELQDWLRQ RI WKHVH DFWRUV .HHS LQ PLQG WKDW GHYHORSPHQW SURMHFWV DUH UDUHO\ IURP WKH SRLQW RI YLHZ RI WKH /HQGHU 7R VHW WKH ZLQGRZ XVH WKH IROORZ WKUHH VWHSV 3ULPDF\ RI 3RLQWRI Ã@hiyvuÃQvsWvr XurÃwrpÃvÃv4 * 3 SryhvrÃÃrÃurÃvyrrr·Ãv 2 $ svr !Ã9rsvrÃQwrpÃ9rryrÃPiwrpvr UurÃvhpÃurÃvyrrrÃurÃur wrpÃvyyÃuhrÃÃurÃpr0Ãur puhtrÃvÃpyvrÃiruhvÃvvvhy ÃrÃrshpr) iÃvqr urvÃpy "Ã9rsvrÃP UurÃhyrÃhqqrqÃiÃvyrrhvÃsÃur pr urÃvyrrrÃph irÃuryqÃhpphiyr 3ULPDF\ RI 3RLQWRI9LHZ 3RLQW RI 9LHZ LV UHODWLYH )RU H[DPSOH LQ WKH FDXVDO KLHUDUFK\ EHORZ WKH FDXVH HIIHFW IRU WKH PLQLVWHU RI WKH 3RZHU 6HFWRU ZRXOG EH GLIIHUHQW WKDQ WKDW RI WKH SURMHFW LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ WHDP 7KH 0LQLVWHU ZRXOG EH DFFRXQWDEOH IRU SURGXFW SURJUDP OHYHO UHVXOWV 7KH SURMHFW LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ WHDP ZRXOG EH DFFRXQWDEOH IRU SURGXFLQJ SURMHFW OHYHO UHVXOWV 7KH FDXVH HIIHFW VWD\V WKH VDPH WKH SRLQW RI YLHZ DOWHUV 3RLQWRI9LHZ LV 5HODWLYH Power Sector Minister Improved employment and Goal income status of rural and urban population Implementation Team The private sector increases D.O. Goal Its productivity and competitiveness Ratepayers use reliable D.O. environmentally benign power Outputs Component Power production & distribution Outputs systems improved Activities Install new equipment, design Component new systems Activities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´,I \RX GRQ·W NQRZ HVVHQWLDO HOHPHQWV RI D FRPSOH[ SURMHFW FOHDUO\ DQG VXFFLQFWO\ WKURXJKRXW WKH ZKHUH \RX·UH SURMHFW F\FOH ,W LV XVHG WR GHYHORS WKH RYHUDOO GHVLJQ RI D SURMHFW WR LPSURYH SURMHFW LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ PRQLWRULQJ DQG WR VWUHQJWKHQ SHULRGLF SURMHFW HYDOXDWLRQ ,Q HVVHQFH WKH JRLQJ DQ\ URDG ZLOO /RJIUDPH LV D ´FDXVH HIIHFWµ PRGHO RI SURMHFW LQWHUYHQWLRQV WR FUHDWH GHVLUHG LPSDFWV IRU JHW \RX WKHUHµ WKH EHQHILFLDULHV Participatory 'HYHORSLQJ WKH /RJIUDPH LV D FROODERUDWLYH SURFHVV WR HQJDJH YLHZV RI LQWHQGHG EHQHILFLDULHV DQG NH\ VWDNHKROGHUV LQ WKH SURMHFW 6WDNHKROGHU RZQHUVKLS DQG FRPPLWPHQW HTXDOO\ LPSRUWDQW DV WHFKQLFDO GHVLJQ TXDOLW\ DQG LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ UHDGLQHVV RI WKH SURMHFW WHDP Conflict Resolution Model 7KH /RJIUDPH GHILQHV D VHW RI UHODWLRQVKLSV DPRQJ SURYLGHUV DQG XVHUV RI UHVXOWV $V D GLDORJXH PDWUL[ WKH /RJIUDPH SURYLGHV D VWUXFWXUHG DQG IRFXVHG DSSURDFK WR ZKDW FDQ EH DQ HPRWLRQDOO\ FKDUJHG QHJRWLDWLRQ SURFHVV %HFDXVH WKH /RJIUDPH LV DERXW UHVXOWV EHQHILWV DQG LPSDFW RXWFRPHV LW LV D XVHIXO FRQIOLFW UHVROXWLRQ IRU GHWHUPLQLQJ SROLWLFDO RXWFRPHV 3ROLWLFDO EHFDXVH VHWWLQJ REMHFWLYHV GHILQHV KRZ VFDUFH UHVRXUFHV ZLOO EH XVHG ZKR ZLOO EHQHILW DQG ZKR ZLOO QRW Flexible, Process-based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ontract Law 7KH /RJIUDPH LQFRUSRUDWHV WKUHH HVVHQWLDO FRQFHSWV IURP FRQWUDFW ODZ WR FODULI\ XQGHUVWDQGLQJ DQG DJUHHPHQWV DPRQJ WKH NH\ VWDNHKROGHUV · 7KH PHHWLQJ RI WKH PLQGV '2 · 3URMHFW 'HOLYHUDEOHV 2XWSXWV · )RUFH 0DMHXUH $VVXPSWLRQV 7KH /RJIUDPH 7KH :RUOG %DQN·V ORJIUDPH XVHV D ER[ PDWUL[ WR VWUXFWXUH D SURMHFW GHVLJQ (DFK ER[ FRQWDLQV VSHFLILF DQG XQLTXH W\SHV RI LQIRUPDWLRQ 7KH ER[HV KDYH D ´G\QDPLF WHQVLRQµ DPRQJ WKHP LQ WKDW FKDQJHV LQ RQH DIIHFW WKH RWKHUV 6RPH FKDQJHV PD\ UHTXLUH IDFHWR IDFH UHQHJRWLDWLRQV RI DJUHHPHQWV The Four Columns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se the Logframe collaboratively to: Performance Monitoring & · /LQN ZLWK WKH &$6 Cause & Effect Indicators Evaluation Assumptions CAS Goal Goal to Super Goal · 6HW SURMHFW REMHFWLYHV 1 5 9 13 · 'HILQH SHUIRUPDQFH LQGLFDWRUV · 'LVWLQJXLVK EHWZHHQ SURMHFW LPSDFW DQG D.O. D.O. to Goal SURMHFW GHOLYHUDEOHV YHUVXV 2 6 10 14 · 'HILQH FULWLFDO DVVXPSWLRQV ULVNV RQ ZKLFK WKH SURMHFW LV EDVHG Outputs Output to Purpose · 'HILQH WKH V\VWHP IRU PRQLWRULQJ HYDOXDWLRQ 3 7 11 15 DQG VXSHUYLVLRQ · ,GHQWLI\ WKH EDVLF &RPSRQHQW FOXVWHUV IRU Component Activities Inputs Activity to Output LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ SODQQLQJ 4 8 12 16 · 'HILQH UHVRXUFHV UHTXLUHG IRU LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN Narrative Performance M&E / Important Summary Indicators Supervision Assumptions CAS Goal: (Goal to Super Goal) Higher objective to which Indicators (increasingly The program evaluation Risk regarding strategic this project, along with standardized) to measure system. impact. others, will contribute. program performance. D.O. Impact (D.O. to CAS Goal) The impact of this project. Measures that describe the People, events, processes, Risk regarding program The change in beneficiary accomplishment of the sources of data for level impact. behavior, systems or PDO The value, benefit organizing the project institutional performance and return on investment. evaluation system. because of the combined output and key assumptions. Outputs (Output to D.O.) The project intervention. Indicators that measure the People, events, processes, Risk regarding design vWhat the project can be value added of sources of data ­ effectiveness. held accountable for implementation of the supervision and monitoring producing. components. system for project implementation. Components Input / Resources (Component to Output) The main component Budget by component. People, events, processes, Risk regarding clusters that must be Monetary, physical, & sources of data and implementation and efficiency. undertaken in order to human resources required monitoring system for accomplish the Outputs. to produce the Outputs. project design. /RJLFDO )UDPHZRUN 7DNHQ WRJHWKHU WKHVH FRUH FRQFHSWV SURYLGH DQ RUJDQL]DWLRQDO IUDPHZRUN IRU VXPPDUL]LQJ WKH IXQGDPHQWDOV RI WKH SURMHFW 7KH /RJIUDPH GRHV QRW UHSODFH RU VXEVWLWXWH IRU WUDGLWLRQDO DQDO\WLFDO WRROV DQG PHWKRGV ,QVWHDG LW SURYLGHV D VWUXFWXUH IRU XVLQJ WKRVH WRROV SURGXFWLYHO\ DQG FROODERUDWLYHO\ 7KHVH IHDWXUHV FRPH DOLYH LQ XVLQJ WKH /RJIUDPH DV RQH HOHPHQW LQ D SURMHFW PDQDJHPHQW V\VWHP Advantages and Limitations of Using the Logical Framework Advantages Limitations · It helps you ask the right questions. · Organizations may promote a blueprint, rigid · or inflexible approach, making the Logframe a It guides systematic and logical analysis of the straitjacket to creativity and innovation. key interrelated elements that constitute a well-designed project. · The strong focus on results can miss the · opportunity to define and improve processes. It defines linkages between the project and external factors. · The Logframe is only one of several tools to · be used during project preparation, It facilitates common understanding and better implementation and evaluation, and it does not communication among decision-makers replace targetgroup analysis, time planning, managers and other parties involved in the impact analysis etc. project. · · The Logframe is a general analytic tool. It is It prepares us for replication of successful policy neutral on questions of income results. distribution, employment opportunities, access · It ensures continuity of approach when the to resources, local participation cost and original project staff is replaced. feasibility of strategies and technology, or · effects on the environment. It provides a shared methodology & terminology among governments, donor agencies, contractors and clients. · Widespread use of the Logical Framework format makes it easier to undertake both sector studies and comparative studies in general. :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN Summary of how the Logframe treats the critical project issues Strategic rationale. CAS Goal to which project impact Why we are doing Project. The real of the What we hope accomplish. Value added. How we will The Relationshi The critical and &$6 *2$/ $OLJQPHQW ZLWK 6WUDWHJ\ 3URJUDP # OLJQPHQW LV IXQGDPHQWDO $OLJQPHQW RI SURMHFWV ZLWK SURJUDP Narrativ Performance Monitoring & Assumptions, Summary Indicators Risks LV NH\ VR EHJLQ ZLWK WKH FDXVDO ORJLF EHWZHHQ WKH &$6 *RDO Evaluation DQG '2 7KH &$6 *RDO LV WKH EURDGHU REMHFWLYH WR ZKLFK \RXU SURMHFW SOXV RWKHUV ZLOO FRQWULEXWH ,W LV RIWHQ D VWUDWHJLF VHFWRU RU 86TÃBhy) SURJUDP JRDO DQG PD\ DSSHDU DV WKH &$6 *RDO VWDWHPHQW LQ VHYHUDO UurÃuvturÃqr /RJIUDPHV ,W LV QRW H[SHFWHG WKDW D VLQJOH SURMHFW ZLOO DFKLHYH DOO vhpÃÃuvpuÃuv wrpÃhytÃvu WKDW LV VWDWHG 7KH SURMHFW ZLOO EH RQH RI WKH FDXVHV DPRQJ RWKHUV urÃvyy 7KH &$6 *RDO VWDWHPHQW PD\ EH WDNHQ GLUHFWO\ IURP JRYHUQPHQW pvir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revalence of HIV in Northern Region Reduced :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN 5HPHPEHU WKH &$6 *RDO LV QRW DQ DJJUHJDWLRQ RI WKH '2 DQG 6WDWH WKH &$6 *RDO DV FRPSOHWHG LW LV QRW D UHVWDWHPHQW RU UHIRUPXODWLRQ RI WKH '2 D DFWLRQ LQ WKH IXWXUH XVLQJ D WDXWRORJ\ .HHS WKH FDXVDO ORJLF FOHDU 7KH WDXWRORJ\ DOZD\V ZHDNHQV WKH SURMHFW GHVLJQ VWURQJ DFWLRQ YHUE &$6 *RDO &KHFNOLVW 9 à &RQVLVWHQWZLWKWKHVWUDWHJLFGHYHORSPHQWSROLF\ à &RQVLVWHQWZLWKDJHQF\·VPLVVLRQVWDWHPHQWSROLF\JXLGHOLQHV à 5HSUHVHQWVVXIILFLHQWMXVWLILFDWLRQIRUWKHSURMHFW à 7DUJHWJURXSVH[SOLFLWO\GHILQHG à ([SUHVVHGDVDGHVLUHGHQGQRWDVDPHDQVDSURFHVV à 6WDWHGFOHDUO\LQYHULILDEOHWHUPV à 1RWDUHVWDWHPHQWRUVXPPDU\RIWKH'2 6HH SDJH IRU IXOOHU GLVFXVVLRQ RI WKH WDXWRORJ\ '(9(/230(17 2%-(&7,9( :K\ 'R WKH 3URMHFW" 6 KH 'HYHORSPHQW 2EMHFWLYH GHVFULEHV WKH GHVLUHG Narrative Performance Monitoring & Assumptions, Summary Indicators Evaluation Risks RXWFRPH ZH KRSH WKH SURMHFW ZLOO DFKLHYH RU KRZ WKH ZRUOG ZLOO EH FKDQJHG DV D UHVXOW RI WKH SURMHFW V 2XWSXWV 7KH '2 RXWFRPH LV YHU\ RIWHQ WKH FKDQJH LQ EHKDYLRU RI WKH SURMHFW EHQHILFLDULHV )RU H[DPSOH D '2 W\SLFDOO\ GHVFULEHV WKH XVH RI SURMHFW 9P UurÃvrqvhrÃpr 2XWSXWV E\ VRFLDO JURXSV RU EHQHILFLDULHV 8uhtrÃvÃirrsvpvh iruhvÃrà · New production methods used vvvhy · New systems implemented rshprÃirphrÃs urÃpivrqà · Quality services provided hrtÃhqÃxr hv ,W PD\ DOVR GHVFULEH WKH FKDQJH LQ SHUIRUPDQFH RI D V\VWHP RU DQ LQVWLWXWLRQ · Electric power to end-user rate-payers increased · Secondary school graduates increased :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN Change in behavior · Agricultural production increased · Increased use of health services · Student enrollment & retention rates increased Change in System Performance · Increased use of renewable energy · Sustainable yield timber production Change in Institutional Performance · More & better trained graduates produced · Increased business starts · Export volume increased Single Development Objective: $V D UXOH RI WKXPE ZH VWURQJO\ UHFRPPHQG WKDW D SURMHFW KDYH RQO\ RQH '2 7KH UHDVRQ IRU WKLV LV D SUDFWLFDO RQH ([SHULHQFH GHPRQVWUDWHV WKDW LW LV HDVLHU IRU DQ LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ WHDP WR IRFXV SURMHFW 2XWSXWV RQ D VLQJOH '2 0XOWLSOH '2·V ZHDNHQ WKH GHVLJQ DQG GLIIXVH SURMHFW HIIRUWV ,I \RX KDYH PXOWLSOH 'HYHORSPHQW 2EMHFWLYHV ILUVW FKHFN WR VHH LI \RX FDQ VXPPDUL]H WKH PXOWLSOH 'HYHORSPHQW 2EMHFWLYHV LQ D VLQJOH '2 VWDWHPHQW DQG FODULI\ WKHVH VHYHUDO GLPHQVLRQV LQ WKH SHUIRUPDQFH LQGLFDWRUV 6HH WKH H[DPSOH EHORZ 7KH PXOWLSOH '2·V RI WKH ILUVW RQH FDQ EH HDVLO\ VXPPDUL]HG DV D VLQJOH '2 DV VKRZQ LQ WKH VHFRQG Check #1: Before After Development Objective Development Objective 1. Forest resources preserved 1. A managed system of protected, 2. Coastal areas preserved productive and sustainable used 3. Soil salinity decreased natural resources. 4. Wetland area protected Performance Indicators 5. Forest biodiversity stabilized 1.1 Forest resource indicators 6. et al 1.2 Wetland indicators Performance Indicators 1.3 Soil salinity indicators 1.1 Forest resource indicators 1.4 Marine indicators 2.1 Coastal areas protection indicators 1.5 Coastal area indicators 3.1 Soil salinity indicators 1.6 Bio-diversity indicators 4.1 Wetland area protection indicators 5.1 Bio-diversity indicators 1.7 Grazing indicators 1.8 Regulatory systems operation indicators 'HYHORSPHQW 2EMHFWLYH 6HFRQG FKHFN LI \RX DUH WU\LQJ WR VXPPDUL]H PXOWLSOH SURMHFWV ,Q WKDW FDVH HDFK '2 ZLOO KDYH D VHSDUDWH VHW RI 2XWSXWV than 10% of the baseline national coral reef system. figure 3. 10% decrease in the number of infringements ( reported) Outputs: The consistent and effective 1. 90% of infringements lead to proper enforcement by national enforcement of national and regional and regional authorities. level regulations is improved 2. Viable framework for a national coral reef system adopted within 8 months of development 3. Community-based management pilots evaluated as workable models. Example: Education Project Narrative Summary Performance Indicators Baseline Phase II triggers D.O. Performance of the 1. Completion rates 55% 63% Education System 2. Repetition rates 4% 3% improved 3. Dropout rates 4.5% 3.5% 4. Illiteracy rates 24% 22% 0RQLWRULQJ (YDOXDWLRQ An Annual Learning System Calendar 'LVFRYHU\ (VWDEOLVK DQ DQQXDO SHUIRUPDQFH F\FOH RI PDQDJHPHQW HYHQWV 7KHVH PLJKW LV D LQFOXGH \HDUURXQG HYHQW · 3URMHFW ODXQFK :RUNVKRS RQH WLPH · 0RQLWRULQJ (YDOXDWLRQ V\VWHP 'HVLJQ :RUNVKRS · :HHNO\ 7HDP 0HHWLQJV · 0RQWKO\ 8SGDWH DQG 3UREOHP 6ROYLQJ 0HHWLQJV · 4XDUWHUO\ 5HYLHZ 5LVN 0DQDJHPHQW :RUNVKRS · 0LG\HDU 3HUIRUPDQFH ,PSURYHPHQW 3ODQQLQJ :RUNVKRS · $QRWKHU GRQRU ZDV rÃhrÃvyrrrqÃpprsyyÃhqÃvvvhyÃrshprÃv rÃhrÃvyrrrqÃpprsyyÃhqÃvvvhyÃrshprÃv VXSSRVHG WR GR WKH WUDLQLQJ DQG UHODWHG FDSDFLW\ vrq vrq EXLOGLQJ@ 7KH WHDP VWDUWHG ZLWK WKH VWDWHPHQW @rÃHrÃTrpvsvp) @rÃHrÃTrpvsvp) "administrative capacity" ShyÃihxÃphÃhqrhryÃhrÃurÃqrÃsÃrvhyà ShyÃihxÃuhrÃurÃyhÃprvtÃphhpvÃÃhrÃur irÃhqÃurÃvhivyvÃsÃrqÃvrrÃiÃErÃ!Yà 7KLV LV WRR JHQHUDO WR EH RI XVH ,W KDV QR YHUE RU qrÃsÃrvhyÃirÃhqÃurÃvhivyvÃsÃrq urÃvrÃurÃprqvÃPÃvÃrhvhyà vrrÃiÃurÃvrÃprqvÃÃvÃrhvhy VHQVH RI WLPH DQG FDQQRW EH PRQLWRUHG 7KH WHDP ZDV FRQFHUQHG WKDW WKH UXUDO EDQNV EH DEOH WR KDQGOH WKH FUHGLW SURJUDP E\ WKH WLPH QHHGHG WR LPSOHPHQW WKH SURMHFW 7KH DVVXPSWLRQ ZDV UHVWDWHG DV "Administrative capacity building initiatives for the rural banking system are implemented successfully and institutional performance is improved." +RZHYHU LW VWLOO QHHGV WR EH OLQNHG PRUH VSHFLILFDOO\ WR WKH FDXVDO ORJLF RI WKH SURMHFW 7KH WHDP UHZURWH LW DJDLQ "Rural banks can adequately assess the soundness of potential borrowers and the viability of proposed investments by June 200X, the time the credit Output is operational." 7KLV VWDWHPHQW FRXOG EH WDUJHWHG 447 LQ UHODWLRQVKLS WR WKH SURMHFW GHVLJQ 7KHLU &UHGLW 6\VWHP 2XWSXW ZRXOG PDQDJH WKH QXPEHU DQG ORFDWLRQ RI WKH EDQNV PDNH WKHP DFFHVVLEOH WR WKHLU FOLHQWV HVWDEOLVK FULWHULD IRU SRWHQWLDO ERUURZHUV DQG ORDQ SURFHVVLQJ SURFHGXUHV E\ WKH WLPH WKLV FDSDFLW\ LV LQ SODFH /RRN DW WKHVH H[DPSOHV RI PDNLQJ JHQHUDO DVVXPSWLRQV PRUH VSHFLILF LQFOXGH · "Local/national market condition/prices" might read "the area irrigated is not adversely affected by distortions in energy pricing" :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN · "No drought" should be improved to read "10 inches of rainfall between May and October." · "Adequate funding" should be improved to read "3 million dollars counterpart funding supplied by May 1994." · "Food supplies available" should be improved to read "Agencies maintain 6 tons per month rice supply to Site 2" Assumptions Step #3: Analyze their Importance and Probability ­ Rate the Risk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ssumption Matrix 100% HFQDUWRS H KILLER 75% ASSUMPTIONS S ,P\LWODLFLWU& 50% M 25% L 0% 0% L 25% M 50% S 75% H 100% 3UREDELOLW\ RI )DLOXUH (VWLPDWH ERWK &ULWLFDOLW\ DQG 3UREDELOLW\ Sample Rating Scale High (76%-100%) Substantial (51%-75%) Moderate (26%-50%) Low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ssumptions Step #4: Develop/Implement Mitigation Strategy 2QFH $VVXPSWLRQV KDYH EHHQ VSHFLILHG DQG WDUJHWHG WKH\ PD\ EH XVHG WR JXLGH GHFLVLRQV DERXW SURMHFW GHVLJQ DQG PDQDJHPHQW +LJK SHUIRUPDQFH SURMHFW WHDPV VSHQG D JUHDW GHDO RI WLPH WU\LQJ WR LQIOXHQFH WKH SUREDELOLW\ RI WKHLU SURMHFW $VVXPSWLRQV $VVXPSWLRQV DUH FULWLFDO WR WKH VXFFHVV RI WKH SURMHFW EXW VRPH PD\ EH WRR ULVN\ WR SURFHHG ZLWKRXW IXUWKHU SURMHFW PRGLILFDWLRQ 7KH WHDP ZLOO QHHG WR WDNH D VWURQJO\ SUR Brrvp) Brrvp) DFWLYH UROH LQ PRQLWRULQJ WKHVH DVVXPSWLRQV HhprpvpÃhivyv HhprpvpÃhivyv .HHS LQ PLQG WKDW WKH WHDP LV QRW Trpvsvp) DFFRXQWDEOH IRU WKH DVVXPSWLRQV %\ Trpvsvp) AvphyÃqrsvpvÃrqprqÃiÃ#ÈÃiÃrqÃsÃwrpÃrhÃ! AvphyÃqrsvpvÃrqprqÃiÃ#ÈÃiÃrqÃsÃwrpÃrhÃ! GHILQLWLRQ WKH\ OD\ RXWVLGH LWV FRQWURO +RZHYHU WKH DVVXPSWLRQV GR UHSUHVHQW Shvt) Shvt) IRUFH PDMHXUH ZKHQ WKH\ IDLO 7KH SURMHFW 8vvphyvÃÃihvhyÃ$ ÈÃÃ&$È 8vvphyvÃÃihvhyÃ$ ÈÃÃ&$È QihivyvÃÃihvhyÃ$ ÈÃÃ&$È QihivyvÃÃihvhyÃ$ ÈÃÃ&$È WHDP FDQ XVH LWV LQIOXHQFH RU FRQWURO RI RWKHUV WR PRQLWRU DQG PDQDJH WKH HvvthvÃThrt) HvvthvÃThrt) DVVXPSWLRQV 9rryvyrrÃrsprrÃhrtÃsÃhÃpyyrpv 9rryvyrrÃrsprrÃhrtÃsÃhÃpyyrpv 9rryvyrrÃpvphvÃphhvtÃÃurÃpvhyÃpÃs 9rryvyrrÃpvphvÃphhvtÃÃurÃpvhyÃpÃs hÃrhv hÃrhv There are six management alternatives to Killer Assumptions and high risk situations: 1. Change design: add outputs or Components. 2. Add a new project. 3. Abandon project (Killer Assumptions). 4. Monitor & use influence. 5. Take out insurance (performance bond, etc.) 6. Do nothing: risk/benefit from continuing. Decide how to proceed and/or deflect (e.g. contract out) risk. :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN ,Q WKH H[DPSOH IRU LQVWDQFH ZKHQ WKH Narrative Summary Assumptions & ULVN RI LQDGHTXDWH UDLQIDOO UHPDLQHG Risk +LJK WKH SURMHFW GHVLJQ WHDP PLJKW D.O.: Maize production FRQVLGHU increased. · &KDQJLQJ WKH WHFKQRORJ\ RI WKH SURMHFW E\ XVLQJ GURXJKW UHVLVWDQW VHHG YDULHWLHV Outputs: 1 Adequate Rainfall 1. Extension services improved / · :RUNLQJ ZLWK DQRWKHU DJHQF\ delivered. WR LQWURGXFH DQ LUULJDWLRQ 2. Credit program implemented. V\VWHP 3. Farm inputs provided. 4. High yield variety · 'HYHORSLQJ DQ LUULJDWLRQ seeds planted. 2. Administrative capacity V\VWHP LQVLGH WKH SURMHFW DV DQ DGGLWLRQDO 2XWSXW WR EH PDQDJHG · 5HGXFLQJ WKH SURMHFW \LHOG '2 OHYHO H[SHFWDWLRQV RU · $EDQGRQLQJ WKH SURMHFW HQWLUHO\ 8VH D 5LVN $QDO\VLV :RUN 7DEOH VXFK DV WKH RQH EHORZ WR DQDO\]H HDFK RI \RXU KLJKO\ FULWLFDOKLJKO\ ULVN\ DVVXPSWLRQV DQG JHQHUDWH D PLWLJDWLRQ VWUDWHJ\ WKDW WKH SURMHFW WHDP RU RWKHUV FDQ LPSOHPHQW Risk Analysis Work Table Assumptions Performance Criticality Probability Possible Mitigation Strategy Indicators Killer (Y/N) (1-4) (1-4) Indicator 1 for A1 Assumption 1 #4/High #4/High Y Be prepared to 24" rainfall by June switch to drought (A1) Adequate 30 per annum. S*V*P resistant varieties if rainfall. Indicator 2 for A1 trend in rainfall drops below 99 Indicator 3 for A1 levels. 6 VWDNH RU LQWHUHVW LI DSSURSULDWH 9 YDOXH WR VWDNHKROGHU 3 SRZHU WR LQIOXHQFH WKH SUREDELOLW\ RI WKH DVVXPSWLRQULVN $ SURGXFW RI WKH 9 ; 3 FDQ JLYH \RX D UHODWLYH LGHD RI ZKHUH \RX FDQ WDNH PDQDJHPHQW DFWLRQ DQG ZKHUH \RX PD\ QHHG WR ZDUQDGYLVH RWKHUV 7KH WDEOH HQFRXUDJHV WKH WHDP WR LGHQWLI\ .LOOHU $VVXPSWLRQV DQG WKH VWDNHKROGHUV FRQFHUQHG ZLWK ZKHWKHU WKH\ PDWHULDOL]H ,GHQWLI\ VWDNHKROGHUV DQG HQJDJH WKHP LQ WKH ULVN PLWLJDWLRQ VWUDWHJ\ )RU H[DPSOH ZKHUH QDWLRQDO SROLFLHV DUH FRQFHUQHG WKH WHDP PLJKW WU\ WR JHW WKH ULJKW SHRSOH LQYROYHG LQ SROLF\ GLDORJXH RU DW PLQLPXP DOHUW SROLF\ PDNHUV WR WKH SRWHQWLDO HFRQRPLF DQG VRFLDO EHQHILWV WR EH GHULYHG IURP WKHLU SROLFLHV DQG WKH VXFFHVVIXO LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ RI WKH SURMHFW $VVXPSWLRQV DQG 5LVNV Assumptions & Risk Step #5: Manage Assumptions during Implementation 5LVN OHYHOV FKDQJH FRQVWDQWO\ ([SHFW WR PRQLWRU DVVXPSWLRQV DQG ULVNV GXULQJ LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ DQG DGMXVW WKH SURMHFW SODQV LQ UHVSRQVH WR FKDQJLQJ DVVXPSWLRQV 7KH IRXUWK FROXPQ RI WKH ORJIUDPH GHVFULEHV UHVXOWV QHFHVVDU\ IRU WKH DFKLHYHPHQW RI KLJKHU OHYHO RXWFRPHV LW LV MXVW WKDW WKH\ OD\ RXWVLGH RI WKH SURMHFW·V FRQWURO DQGRU LPPHGLDWH UHVSRQVLELOLW\ &RQGXFW D SHUIRUPDQFH DVVHVVPHQW DV D SDUW RI VXSHUYLVLRQ RQ WKH H[WHUQDO DVVXPSWLRQV DV ZHOO DV WKH LQWHUQDO IHDWXUHV RI WKH SURMHFW 8VH WKH IROORZLQJ NLQG RI WDEOH WR DVVHVV WKH SODQQHG YHUVXV DFWXDO RFFXUUHQFH RI WKH SURMHFW DVVXPSWLRQV WKH SRVLWLYH RU QHJDWLYH GULYLQJ IRUFHV LQYROYHG DQG DQ\ SRVVLEOH PLWLJDWLRQ DFWLYLWLHV WKDW PD\ EH DGGHG WR WKH LQWHUQDO DFWLYLW\ OLVW RI WKH SURMHFW Assumption Performance Analysis Work Table % Driving/ Possibility Completed Performance Restraining Impact of Solution Assumptions to Date Planned Gap Forces +/­ (1-5) (1-5) Total Actions Required DO to Goal (see force See See field model) impact influence 1 scale scale below 2 below Output to DO 1 2 Components to Outputs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nalyzing Positive and Negative Forces 5HVWUDLQLQJ )RUFHV 'ULYLQJ )RUFHV ,QDGHTXDWH IXQGLQJ )DYRUDEOH DJURHFRORJ\ /RZ VWDII PRUDOH 3ROLWLFDO VXSSRUW :HDN LQIUDVWUXFWXUH 6WURQJ FRPPXQLW\ RUJDQL]DWLRQ Impact on Project Can Influence/Solve or Use 5=Extremely Important 5=Very easy to influence/solve or use 4=Very Important 4=Easy to influence/solve or use 3=Moderately Important 3=Rather difficult to influence/solve or use 2=Slightly Important 2=Considerably difficult to influence/solve or use 1=Little Importance 1=Extremely difficult to influence/solve or use $VVXPSWLRQV &KHFNOLVW 9 à )RUPXODWHGDVGHVLUDEOHSRVLWLYHFRQGLWLRQV à /LQNHGWRWKHDSSURSULDWHSURMHFWOHYHO à 6SHFLILFKDYHULVNUDWLQJVFDQEHPRQLWRUHG à 2QO\FULWLFDO$VVXPSWLRQVDUHLQFOXGHG à 9HU\ORZULVN$VVXPSWLRQVQRWLQFOXGHG à +LJKULVN$VVXPSWLRQVWKDWDUHERWKLPSRUWDQWDQGXQOLNHO\WRRFFXU.LOOHU $VVXPSWLRQV DUH PDQDJHG à 7KH$VVXPSWLRQVDWWKH&RPSRQHQWOHYHOGRQRWLQFOXGHDQ\´FRQGLWLRQV SUHFHGHQWµ à 7KHUHPDLQLQJ$VVXPSWLRQVDUHSUHFLVHO\DQGYHULILDEO\GHILQHGDQGJLYHQULVN UDWLQJV ´2XJKW LPSOLHV FDQ µ ,PPDQXHO .DQW 0$1$*($%/( ,17(5(67 # FFRXQWDELOLW\ PXVW KDYH ERXQGDULHV Cause & Performance Monitoring & Effect Indicators Evaluation Assumptions CAS Goal 3HRSOH FDQ RQO\ EH H[SHFWHG WR GR D.O. ZKDW WKH\ DUH DEOH WR GR 86TÃBhyà BrhrÃXu UurÃhvhyrÃCvturqrÃth Outputs 0DQDJHDEOH ,QWHUHVW LV EDVHG RQ WKH iwrpvrÃÃuvpuÃurÃwrpÃpvir FRQFHSW RI 3RLQWRI9LHZ ZKLFK Component Activities HVWDEOLVKHV ZKRVH SURMHFW LW LV %\ 9rryrÃPiwrpvr Xu à GHILQLWLRQ SURMHFW LPSOHPHQWHUV DUH XuhÃrÃurÃÃhpuvrrÃÃurórhy´Ã DFFRXQWDEOH IRU SURGXFLQJ 2XWSXWV RQ rrvhyÃvhvÃsÃqpvtà UurÃvhpÃsÃurÃwrp VFKHGXOH DQG ZLWKLQ EXGJHW JLYHQ WKDW WKH $VVXPSWLRQV DW WKH DFWLYLW\ OHYHO KROG WUXH Pà Xuh ,Q IDFW WKH /RJIUDPH 5HVXOWV )UDPHZRUN WhyrÃhqqrqÃsÃurÃvyrrhvÃs UurÃprÃhvvvr REMHFWLYHV KLHUDUFK\ VKRXOG EH UurÃrÃs FRQVWUXFWHG VR WKDW WKLV LV WKH FDVH rsrrprÃsÃurÃwrp 7KUHH NH\ FRQFHSWV IURP FRQWUDFW ODZ DUH 8rÃ6pvvvr C à XVHIXO 8rÃhpvvvrÃÃirÃqrhxrÃhq urÃrprÃhhvyhiyrÃÃqprÃur · 0HHWLQJ RI WKH PLQGV · 'HOLYHUDEOHV ·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oal PvqrÃ8y Development Objective Small farmer agricultural production increased. XvuvÃ8y Outputs 1.1 Training for farmers conducted. 1.2 Appropriate credit system established. 1.3 Farm inputs provided. Components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ÃsÃqpvtÃÃpqpvtÃP vuÃwrpÃrpr 5HVSRQVLEOH ÃsÃhqhvtÃPÃhrtà hppyvuÃ9rryrÃPiwrpvr 5HVSRQVLEOH ÃsÃvvtÃhvÃhq rprqvtÃprpvrÃhpv 5HVSRQVLEOH ÃsÃrÃhhtrrÃruqÃuvpu thvrÃrhÃprÃhqÃrpr 0DQDJHDEOH ,QWHUHVW Escalating Manageable Interest 7KH '2 DW WKH SURMHFW OHYHO PD\ EH WKH 2XWSXW DW WKH Qth SURJUDP OHYHO 2QH JURXS V '2 PD\ EH DQRWKHU JURXS V Thrt 2XWSXW $W WKH SURJUDP RU VWUDWHJLF OHYHO DFFRPSOLVKPHQW * RI WKH SURMHFW '2 LV WKH 2XWSXW UHVSRQVLELOLW\ RI D Qwrp %RUURZHU RU $JHQF\ VLQFH WKH %DQN DORQJ ZLWK WKHLU '2 * %RUURZHU HQWHUV LQWR DQ DJUHHPHQW DERXW D UHWXUQ RQ U6ÃÃSÉ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·V H[WHQVLYH H[SHULHQFH LQ IXQGLQJ HGXFDWLRQ SURMHFWV D FRPPXQLW\EDVHG PRGHO IRU GHFHQWUDOL]LQJ VFKRRO PDQDJHPHQW PD\ EH QHHGHG LQ D SDUWLFXODU FDVH DQG YDULRXV DSSURDFKHV WHVWHG WR ILQG RQH WKDW ZRUNV EHVW LQ WKDW HQYLURQPHQW $GDSWDEOH /HQGLQJ $/ LV LQWHQGHG WR UHVSRQG WR RXU ERUURZHU·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· *UHDWHU IOH[LELOLW\ LQ DGDSWLQJ SURMHFW GHVLJQ DQG ILQDQFLQJ RYHU WLPH · $ VWUXFWXUHG DSSURDFK WR JHQHUDWLQJ QHZ NQRZOHGJH DQG DSSO\LQJ LW ZKHUH FOHDU DQG SURYHQ PRGHOV DUH QRW DYDLODEOH IRU WKH GHVLJQ · (QFRXUDJHPHQW RI DQ ´LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ UHVXOWVµ FXOWXUH EDVHG RQ OHDUQLQJ SDUWQHUVKLS DQG H[SHULPHQWDWLRQ ·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·V REMHFWLYHV The key criteria for the Adaptable Loan are: · Agreement on the long-term development objective; · Demonstrable cost-benefits and justification based on broadly acknowledged economic (and other) parameters for the project; and · As the project is implemented, a logical sequence of phased Outputs strategies with defined milestones, performance indicators, policy requirements, and explicit linkages to the project objective. Multiple Time Frames /RRN DW WKH $3/ PRGHO DQG WKH H[DPSOH WKDW IROORZV 7KH /RJIUDPH HVWDEOLVKHV WZR WLPH UHIHUHQFHV 7KH *RDO DQG WKH '2 DQG UHODWHG LQGLFDWRUV DUH VHW LQ WHUPV RI \HDUV RQ WKH ODVW GD\ RI WKH SURJUDP 7KH 2XWSXWV DUH VHW LQ WHUPV RI WKH ODVW GD\ RI WKH FXUUHQW SKDVH \HDUV W\SLFDOO\ 7KH ,QSXWV DUH VHW DW \HDUV DQG GHILQH WKH RYHUDOO EXGJHW LQ RUGHU WR HVWDEOLVK D EHQHILWFRVW UHODWLRQVKLS +RZHYHU ORRN DJDLQ DW WKH '2 LQGLFDWRUV DQG \RX ZLOO VHH WKDW WKHUH DUH WZR NLQGV RI LQGLFDWRUV · 7KRVH WKDW PHDVXUH '2 LPSDFW DW WKH HQG RI WKH SURJUDP DQG · SKDVHG OHDGLQJ LQGLFDWRUV WKDW SURYLGH JXLGDQFH WR LPSOHPHQWHUV ZKHWKHU WKH\ DUH PDNLQJ DQ LPSDFW ZLWK WKHLU 2XWSXW VWUDWHJ\ WKURXJKRXW LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ 7KH ,QSXW ER[ GHVFULEHV WKH EXGJHW IRU WKH FXUUHQW SKDVH 6RPH 2XWSXW PLOHVWRQH LQGLFDWRUV DQG '2 OHDGLQJ LQGLFDWRUV ZLOO WULJJHU LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ RI WKH QH[W SKDVH $GDSWDEOH /HQGLQJ $3/ /,/ Narrative Summary Performance Indicators Monitoring & Evaluation Assumptions, Risks CAS Goal (S.G. to Supergoal) World Bank CAS Goals Indicators of World Bank or long Indicators at this level are term strategic achievement. generally monitored and or evaluated via various sector or country reports generated outside the project Program Purpose (D.O. to CAS Goal) End of Program Indicators. Indicators of program purpose . The long-term development The key indicators which are are generally monitored and/or Assuming that the program objective of the program. This expected to be achieved upon evaluated via various project purpose is achieved in the long vision statement conveys the completion of the program as a reports, supervision mission term, list any additional improved state of the sector at whole reports and mid-term and final assumptions needed to logically the completion of all phases of evaluation reports. link it to achievement of the CAS the. goal. Program Phasing: A phased approach is pursued in order to attain the vision of an APL, each phase having its own objective. The statement of phasing conveys the theme of each phase as a short descriptive title (e.g., Phase II: privitization of distribution..) Project Development Objective Outcome Indicators Indicators of the PDO are Assuming that the PDO is (PDO): Key indicators specifying the generally monitored and/or achieved, list any additional A one sentence description of the results to be achieved by the end evaluated via various project assumptions needed to justify the behavioral change expected from of the project (Phase I of the reports, supervision mission project's contribution to the the target-beneficiary group or program) reports and mid-term and final stated program purposel institutions by the end of the evaluation reports. project (Phase I of the program). Outputs (Output to D.O.) The Monitoring & Evaluation system for the Adaptable Loan. The terms of reference for the Key performance indicators for Assuming that the outputs are first project (Phase I of the each output specified in terms of Each Phase will produce the achieved by the end of the program). The value added of the quantity, quality and time. design for the next Phase. In project list any additional components. There should be order to produce the findings, assumptions needed to achieve one output statement for each conclusions and action the PDO corresponding project component recommendations required to design the subsequent phases, each Phase must include in its implementation a Monitoring and Evaluation System which provides structured learning about the effectiveness of the Phase's Output strategy in producing impact. It will be based on questions such as: "Is it working?", "Can it be improved?", "Is there a better way?", "Is it worth it?". Components Inputs (Component to Output) Clusters of subcomponents and /LVW RI FRPSRQHQW FRVWV Inputs are generally monitored Assuming that components and activities that are designed to LQFOXGLQJ FRQWLQJHQFLHV via progress reports and activities are implemented produce a single project output disbursement reports. successfully, list any additional assumptions needed to achieve the outputs. :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN /HDUQLQJ LV FHQWUDO WR WKLV NLQG RI ORDQ 7KH SURMHFW GHVLJQ DQG WKH VWUDWHJ\ IRU PDQDJLQJ XQFHUWDLQW\ LV FUHDWHG LQ LQFUHPHQWV GXULQJ LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ 0DNH WKLV OHDUQLQJ V\VWHP H[SOLFLW DQG HQJDJH WKH IXOO UDQJH RI VWDNHKROGHUV DQG LPSOHPHQWHUV LQ GHILQLQJ DQG PDQDJLQJ LW Narrative Summary Performance Indicators CAS Goal Program Purpose Coral reefs and associated ecosystems in 1. Coral mortality index (CMI) /dead coral cover decreasing by an Indonesia protected, rehabilitated and in average of 1% per year (coral rehabilitation indicator). sustainable use while enhancing welfare of 2. Butterfly fish counts for existing species increasing by an coastal communities. average of 20% (bio-diversity indicator). 3. Average income per capita of target groups of coastal communities increasing by 5% p/a in real terms (welfare indicator). 4. Average productivity of target species such as groups (catch per unit of effort) increasing by 65% in managed reefs over 10 years (sustainable use indicator). Program Phasing Phase I Policy Analysis and Capacity Building Phase II Policy Implementation Phase II: Policy Enforcement P.D.O. Pilot communitiies actively support the 1. 75% of pilot communities have the majority of their members management of coral reef areas and the working within the regulatory framework ecosystems 2. 90% of pilot communities are satisfied with their ability to manage the ecosystem as supported by government agencies Outputs Outputs for Phase I: Indicators for end of Phase 1 1. An adequate system for enforcement of coral reef regulations is tested and in place for scale up. 2. Pilot community based management plans in 2 sites designed and tested. 3. Policy options for management and preservation of coral reefs are evaluated by by national and regional authorities. $GDSWDEOH /HQGLQJ $3/ /,/ 7KH /HDUQLQJ ,QQRYDWLRQ /RDQ /,/ DV $SSOLHG 5 ' Development 7KH /,/ SURYLGHV D IUDPHZRUN IRU DQ LQQRYDWLYH Project DSSURDFK WR GHYHORSPHQW SURMHFWV 7KH\ DUH UHVXOWV * RULHQWHG RI VKRUW GXUDWLRQ KLJKO\ IRFXVHG DQG GRQH LIL for Applied IRU D VSHFLILF SXUSRVH /LNH DSSOLHG UHVHDUFK DQG R&D Project GHYHORSPHQW 5 ' WKH /,/ LV PRVW HIIHFWLYH ZKHQ LW '2 * VHUYHV FOLHQWV DQG KDV D FOHDUO\ GHILQHG UHOHYDQFH 7\SLFDOO\ WKH FOLHQW IRU PRVW /,/V LV DQRWKHU SURMHFW 7KH /,/ PD\ EH XVHG WR LGHQWLI\ D QHZ 2 '2 WHFKQRORJ\ WHFKQLTXH PHWKRGRORJ\ $ 2 DSSURDFK RU WR FUHDWH $ DQ LPSURYHG LQVWLWXWLRQDO FDSDFLW\ ,W HDFK FDVH WKH WHFKQRORJ\ RU FDSDFLW\ WKDW LV GHYHORSHG VKRXOG KDYH DQ LQWHQGHG XVHU RI WKH LQQRYDWLRQ FUHDWHG E\ WKH /,/ 7KLV LV WKH PHDQLQJ RI UHOHYDQFH /RRN DW WKH GLDJUDP 7KH /,/ ZLOO XVH D VHW RI 2XWSXWV WR FUHDWH WKH LQQRYDWLRQ 7KH SXUSRVH RI WKH QHZO\ FUHDWHG WHFKQRORJ\ RU FDSDFLW\ LV WKDW LW ZLOO EH XVHG E\ WKH FXVWRPHU LQ DQRWKHU SURMHFW ,Q RWKHU ZRUGV WKH RQO\ UHDVRQ IRU XQGHUWDNLQJ WKH /,/ LV WR VHUYH D KLJKHU OHYHO REMHFWLYH :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN /RRN DW WKH GLDJUDP EHORZ DQG QRWLFH WKDW WKH '2 FDQ KDYH WZR LQGLFDWRUV 7KH ILUVW LQGLFDWRU GHVFULEHV WKH HIIHFWLYHQHVV RI WKH LQQRYDWLRQ DQG WKH VHFRQG GHVFULEHV WKH XVH WR ZKLFK LW ZLOO EH SXW 7KH LQGLFDWRUV DUH UHDOO\ WZR GLPHQVLRQV RI WKH VDPH RXWFRPH 7KH FOLHQW ZLOO XVH VRPHWKLQJ WKDW ZRUNV HIIHFWLYHO\ Narrative Summary Performance Indicators CAS Goal Small farmer agriclutural production increased. Small farmer agricultural production and productivity levels increased in areas using the improved technology as part of an integrated project strategy. D.O. for Follow on Project Production of maize in Striga-infested regions of country X are increased by 30% by 12/200X Striga resistant maize varieties are used by (maintaining x, y, quality standards) (effectiveness) farmers in all striga infested areas of country X. D.O. Effective Striga resistant maize varieties used in pilot 1 Production of maize in Striga-infested research areas areas of country X increased by 40% by 12/9X (maintaining x, y, quality standards) (effectiveness) 2 10 new projects using varieties and extension service recommendations data by 12/200X. (use) Outputs 1 Striga resistant maize varieties identified. 1.1 2 Hybrid, 2 composite and 4 open varieties identified by 12/9X. 2 Seed multiplication capacity of selected 2.1 National seed company producing 200 MT of Sub-Saharan seed companies increased. certified maize annually by 12/9X. 3 Striga research capacity of selected Sub-Saharan 3.1 2 Maize breeders, 2 weed scientists, 1 agronomist research institutes strengthened. and 1 plant biochemist trained and contracted at 3 selected research institutes by 2/9X. 4 Information network for Striga researchers 4.1 Research methods/results disseminated through established and dissemination method developed. semi-annual network reports and conferences from 199X-200X. 4.2 Going to scale installation methodology developed and ready for use by other projects by end of research. $GDSWDEOH /HQGLQJ $3/ /,/ 6WUXFWXUH RI WKH /,/ %HORZ WKHUH DUH WKUHH H[DPSOHV RI DSSOLHG 5 ' W\SH /,/ SURMHFWV D VHHG WHFKQRORJ\ WKH GHYHORSPHQW RI D WHFKQLFDO VWUDWHJ\ DQG WKH GHYHORSPHQW RI D PHWKRGRORJ\ WKDW FDQ EH UHSOLFDWHG 7KHLU VWUXFWXUH LV YHU\ VLPLODU 7KHUH DUH XVXDOO\ DW OHDVW WKUHH JHQHULF 2XWSXW HOHPHQWV WR WKH /,/ DV DQ LQQRYDWLRQ · 2XWSXW WKH LGHQWLILFDWLRQ SLORWLQJ DQG YDOLGDWLRQ RI WKH H[SHULPHQWDO WHFKQRORJ\ WHFKQLTXH DSSURDFK PHWKRGRORJ\ RU FDSDFLW\ · 2XWSXWV 7KH GHYHORSPHQW RI WKH GLVVHPLQDWLRQ RU LQVWDOODWLRQ SDFNDJH RU WKH JRLQJ WR VFDOH PHWKRGRORJ\ · 2XWSXW 7KH OHDUQLQJ V\VWHP DQG WKH /,/ SURMHFW WHDP WR PDQDJH LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ DQG DVVXUH WKH UHOHYDQFH RI WKH ZRUN WR WKH FOLHQW 7KHUH PD\ EH DQ DGGLWLRQDO RQH · 2XWSXW &DSDFLW\ %XLOGLQJ WKH QHHG WR EXLOG WKH FDSDFLW\ WR GR DQG DV WKH\ DUH EHLQJ LPSOHPHQWHG 6tvpyhyà CAS Strategic Goal 9rryrà Small farmer poverty reduced Qwrp à GDG 9rryrà Increased small farmer agricultural production ÃÃGDG Piwrpvr & livestock productivity 86TÃBhy 1. Infrastructure 2. Land & animal 4. Small farmer credit 5. Seed multiplication 3. Striga resistant ÃÃGDG Qwrpà development program. husbandry services program operational. capacity increased. varieties introduced 9rryr P provided. (R&D). ÃPiwrpvr The technology, method, The dissemination or The Learning System which approach, technique needed installation package or closely monitors the R&D Qwrpà for completion of the client method which will respond to effort and it application to the project's Output strategy. all the systems and client project. ÃÃGDG 8r sustainability issues posed by 8r the project and its causal logic. :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN Narrative Summary Performance Indicators CAS Goal 1. Increase regional and local economic 1.1 annual economic growth is x% private sector led. development led by private sector 1.2 More than 50% of foreseen investments made by private sector. investment P.D.O. for follow on Project 1.1 X other regions adopt approved methodologies and tools. Model methodologies 1.2 Regional planning and public programming in x% economic regions replicated/expanded to other economic are carried out according to methodologies design, tested and refined regions of the country. under the proposed project. 1.3 X% private investments planned for three years to come reflect regional priorities as determined by RDCs P.D.O. 1.1 Pilot areas adopt approved methodologies and tools. Model methodologies 1.2 Planning and public programming in x% pilot areas are carried out replicated/expanded in selected pilot according to methodologies design, tested and refined under the areas. proposed project. . Outputs 1.1 x# RDCs established in pilot sites. 1. Regional Learning Package for 1.2 Regional Development Frameworks mapped out in each pilot site improved regional planning and according to public involvement guidelines. investment programming designed and 1.3 Regional PIP decision making process decentralized in 3 pilot sites. tested in three selected regions. 1.4 Regional round-tables for PIP preparation held in x# selected regions by state. 1.5 Sustainable Regional Information Systems (RIS) installed & operational in x# selected region, by end of project. 1.6 Regional & municipal public information centers established in each of the selected region (see description) by end of project. 2. Regional information systems 2.1 Detailed design for information systems completed and systems designed, tested and established in three installed in selected regions by x date. pilot regions. 2.2 guidelines, user's manual and all relevant documentation completed and ready for dissemination to other regions. 3. Evaluation and dissemination 2.3 National TV staff trained in methods and tools for dissemination of the mechanisms for expansion of the system. Regional Knowledge Model established 3.1 National TV Planning Unit fully equipped and operational for and operational. dissemination of regional kits (RDCs, RDFs, RPIPs, RFICs) 3.2 Dissemination seminars held in x # regional by EoP. 3.3 Evaluation reports of opinions and interests from x # regions produced by y date. 3.4 Ex-post evaluation and financial audit of pilot experience completed and submitted by x date. '(6,*1 48$/,7< 5(9,(: ,PSURYLQJ WKH TXDOLW\ RI SURMHFW GHVLJQ DQG LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ LV RQH RI WKH NH\V WR DFKLHYLQJ JUHDWHU SURMHFW LPSDFW 6HFWLRQ RI WKH %DQN·V 5DSLG 4XDOLW\ DW (QWU\ $VVHVVPHQW LQVWUXPHQW LV DQ LPSRUWDQW WRRO GLUHFWO\ UHODWHG WR WKH /RJIUDPH Quality at Entry Assessment #1: Project Concept, Objectives and Approach Logframe reference 1. Project consistent with the CAS and sector Go the CAS goal and indicators to see the strategy? consistency. Review the Assumptions regarding (Rationale for Bank involvement? Policy the policy environment necessary for achieving environment conducive to good project D.O. and Goal level impact. implementation? Adequate sector knowledge underpinning project?) 2. Rationale for implementing the project in the Compare the public sector Output intervention public sector? strategy to a private sector or blended model. Can it be justified? 3. Clarity and realism of project objectives? Review the PDO Check the cause & effect. Is it a logical result of the Outputs? Check for tautology. Is it a restatement of the Outputs in (Can they be measured? Are they too different words? Review the indicators. Do they demanding?) measure the PDO and are they independent from measures of results at other levels? Can the implementers measure them and are they affordable? Are they targeted with quantity, quality and time in a way that describes the client for the Outputs and the sustainability issues? Review the assumptions at the Output level. Are they killer assumptions with no risk mitigation strategy? Is the PDO outside the control of the implementers of the Outputs, but still the response of the client to the Outputs? 4. Appropriateness of project approach? Define how much learning is required. Known solutions: (a traditional investment loan, or blueprint approach). Unknown solutions: (a (Blueprint vs. Flexible design? Pilot? Level :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN #1: Project Concept, Objectives and Approach Logframe reference of complexity?) Learning & Innovation Loan). The approach should be justified by it relevance (the degree to which it achieves a PDO impact). Look at the PDO and the Output strategy. In the blueprint approach there is low risk in the Output strategy. In the APL, the Outputs are unknown and need to be discovered through implementation. The LIL and pilot are creating Outputs for use by a project. Show how this design was validated elsewhere. 5. Does project design adequately reflect lessons Refer to specific situations in which this Output of experience? and Output Assumptions produced a relevant PDO impact. If this cannot be shown, explain (Similar operations in the country, Bank's what has been learned from past experiences, experience in the sector, OED findings) and what will work. 6. Appropriateness and realism of project Look at the external Assumptions at the conditionality, including balance between upfront action Component/Activities and Output levels. How and conditionality? realistic is the causal relationship between these and the internal design of the project? Review the Conditions Precedent in the Logframe. Can these be met prior to project implementation? 7. Strength of Borrower commitment to the project? Review the process by which the Logframe was prepared. How involved was the Borrower? Will they put their name on this Logframe? Did they participate in the Stakeholder Analysis, Problem & Objective Analysis, and the Logframe? $ EDVLF VHW RI SURMHFW GHVLJQ TXDOLW\ TXHVWLRQV XVLQJ WKH /RJIUDPH IRUPDW LV VKRZQ RQ WKH QH[W SDJH 'HVLJQ 4XDOLW\ 5HYLHZ 3URMHFW 'HVLJQ 6XPPDU\ &KHFNOLVW Narrative Summary Measurable Indicators Monitoring & Supervision Assumptions/Risks Goal: (Goal to Mission): The goal is clearly stated. The Goal level indicators are objectively verifiable in terms of quantity, quality and time. PDO Impact/Outcomes: DO to Goal: The project has one PDO, if The indicators at the PDO This column identifies where The if/then relationship possible. level are independent from the information for verifying between the DO and the The PDO is not a the Outputs. They are a each indicator of project Country Strategy is logical reformulation of the Outputs. measure of the PDO, not a impact will be found, and the and doesn't skip important summary of the Outputs. process for evaluating them. steps. The PDO/impact is outside of the direct management The PDO indicators measure control of the project team. what is important and the project impact to be The PDO is clearly stated. sustained. Outputs: T.O.R. Output to DO: All the Outputs are The Output indicators are This column identifies where The Outputs plus the necessary for accomplishing objectively verifiable in terms the information for verifying Assumptions in this column the PDO. of quantity, quality, and time. each indicator of project produce the necessary and The Outputs are clearly The Outputs define the impact will be found, and the sufficient conditions for stated. management responsibility of process for evaluating them. achieving the project's DO. The Outputs are stated as the project. results Outputs describe the value added by the components. Components: Inputs/Resources: Activities to Output: The Activities define the The Inputs describe the costs This column identifies where The Assumptions are action strategy for and other resources required the information for verifying conditions outside the direct accomplishing each Output. for accomplishing the PDO. each indicator of project control of the project but They describe the impact will be found, and the necessary to achieve project performance budget for process for evaluating them. Outputs. converting Inputs into Activities which achieve Outputs necessary for producing PDO impact. :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN Logframe Design Checklist 9 ___ 1. The project has one Development Objective. ___ 2. The Development Objective is not a reformulation of the Outputs. ___ 3. The Development Objective is outside the management accountability of the project. ___ 4. The Development Objective is clearly stated. ___ 5. All the Outputs are necessary for accomplishing the Development Objective. ___ 6. The Outputs are clearly stated as results. ___ 7. The Components define the action strategy for accomplishing each Output. ___ 8. The CAS Goal is clearly stated and is not a reformulation of the DO. ___ 9. The If/Then relationship between the Development Objective and CAS Goal does not skip important steps. ___ 10. The Assumptions describe, in positive terms, the important conditions external to the project which have a downside risk of not materializing. ___ 11. The Assumptions at the Component level do not include any "conditions precedent". (These are required before Components can begin.) ___ 12. The Outputs plus the Assumptions at that level produce the necessary and sufficient conditions for achieving the Development Objective. ___ 13. The Development Objective plus Assumptions at that level describe the critical conditions for achieving the CAS Goal. ___ 14. The relationship between the Inputs and the Components is realistic. ___ 15. The relationship between the Outputs and the Development Objective is realistic. ___ 16. The vertical logic among Component Output, Development Objective, and CAS Goal is realistic as a whole. ___ 17. The indicators at the Development Objective level are independent from the Outputs. They are not a summary of Outputs but a measure of impact. ___ 18. The Development Objective indicators measure what is important; the impact, expected value, rate of return, the benefit. ___ 19. The Development Objective indicators have quantity, quality and time measures. ___ 20. The Output indicators are objectively verifiable in terms of quantity, quality and time. ___ 21. The CAS Goal-level indicators are objectively verifiable in terms of quantity, quality, and time. ___ 22. The Inputs described at the activity level define the resources required for accomplishing the Development Objective. ___ 23. The Monitoring & Evaluation system column identifies where the information for verifying each indicator will be found and the process for improving the design. ___ 24. The Components identify any actions required for managing the Monitoring & Evaluation system. ___ 25. The Outputs define the management responsibility of the project. ___ 26. When reviewing the Logframe, you can define the evaluation plan for the project. 7+( 6758&785$/ $'-8670(17 /2$1 5 UXFWXUDO $GMXVWPHQW /RDQV UHSUHVHQW QHDUO\ RI WKH %DQN·V FXUUHQW SRUWIROLR 7KH +LJK ,PSDFW $GMXVWPHQW /RDQ +,$/ LV SDUW RI D FRPSOHPHQWDU\ GHYHORSPHQW VWUDWHJ\ WKDW FDQ ZRUN V\QHUJLVWLFDOO\ ZLWK LQYHVWPHQW EDQNLQJ Improved private sector Improved private competitiveness competitivene Other enabling Other Adjustment reforms Adjustment Investment project Investment conditions or conditions (HIAL impact impac assumptions assumptio ··education ··health ··agriculture ··private private sector /RRN DW WKH VDPSOH /RJIUDPH IRU DQ $GMXVWPHQW /RDQ 7KH FRUH ORJLF GHILQHV WKH UHIRUPV DV 2XWSXWV DQG LQYHVWPHQW RSHUDWLRQV DV DVVXPSWLRQV ² LQ LQYHVWPHQW SURMHFWV WKLV LV UHYHUVHG %RWK ZRUN WRJHWKHU WR DFKLHYH LPSURYHG SHUIRUPDQFH RI WKH 3ULYDWH 6HFWRU 3ODQ WKH $GMXVWPHQW /RDQ OLNH D QRUPDO SURMHFW :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN $GMXVWPHQW ,QYHVWPHQW /RDQV A Structural Adjustment Loan Narrative Summary Assumptions PDO Private sector performance and competitiveness increased. Outputs: (Policy Interventions) (Investments & expenditures) 1 Privatization & Enterprise Reform program 1. Public sector programs and projects deliver implemented improved: 2. Trade Reform Program implemented and Education services sustained. Health services 3.Tax Reform Program implemented and Business development services operational. Enterprise support services 4. Transport Regulatory Reform Program Road rehabilitation & maintenance services implemented and operational. Contractual rights protected by courts 5. Judicial Reform Program implemented. et al 6. Customs Reform Program implemented and 2. Public expenditures to improved government operational. services at predictable levels. /2*)5$0( 7,36 ,Q WKLV VHFWLRQ VRPH RI WKH PRVW XVHIXO WLSV LQ ZRUNLQJ ZLWK WKH /RJIUDPH DUH VXPPDUL]HG &DOO WKH +HOS 'HVN DW DQ\ WLPH IRU DGGLWLRQDO VXSSRUW 6HW 3ULRULWLHV %HJLQ ZLWK WKH $OWHUQDWLYHV VHOHFWHG LQ WKH 7UHHV ,Q GHWHUPLQLQJ WKHVH D 3RLQWRI9LHZ ZDV 6HOHFW $OWHUQDWLYHV %XLOG /RJ)5$0( HVWDEOLVKHG ZKLFK VKRXOG SRSXODWH WKH ILUVW Narrative Summary CAS Goal FROXPQ 1DUUDWLYH 6XPPDU\ RI WKH /RJIUDPH 7KLV LV WKH EDVLF SURMHFW GHVFULSWLRQ D.O. · 9DOLGDWH SURMHFW DOLJQPHQW ZLWK Outputs VWUDWHJLF REMHFWLYHV · 5HILQH WKH FDXVH HIIHFW ORJLF Component Activities · 0DNH WKH GHVLJQ FOLHQWFHQWHUHG GHPDQGGULYHQ %HJLQ DW WKH HQG'LYHUJHQW YHUVXV Convergent Model FRQYHUJHQW WKLQNLQJ :RUN GHGXFWLYHO\ IURP RYHUDOO VWUDWHJLF JRDOV XVLQJ D FRQYHUJHQW UHVXOWVRULHQWHG DSSURDFK UDWKHU WKDQ LQGXFWLYHO\ XVLQJ DQ LQSXW RULHQWHG DSSURDFK Divergent Model :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN 'HILQH WKH &XVWRPHU 'HVLJQ SURMHFWV WR KHOS FXVWRPHUV VHUYH WKHLU FXVWRPHU Super Goal Cause Supplier More productive private sector. 6XSSO\ ,I 2XWSXWV DUH Effect Customer CAS Goal VLGH SURGXFHG WKHQ ZKDW Graduates productively Cause Supplier employed. ZLOO EH WKH LPSDFW" Effect Customer Development Objective More & better trained ,Q RUGHU WR DFFRPSOLVK Cause students graduated from Supplier secondary schools. 'HPDQG LPSDFW ZKDW 2XWSXWV Effect Customer QHHG WR EH Outputs 1.1 Curriculum improved DFFRPSOLVKHG" 1.2 Policy & procedures Cause implemented Supplier 1.3 Staff development Effect program implemented Customer 1.4 Schoolroom capacity increased 'HVLJQ WKH &DXVH (IIHFW1HFHVVDU\ 6XIILFLHQW &RQGLWLRQV ,GHQWLI\ WKH FDXVDO VWUXFWXUH %H FDUHIXO QRW WR FRQIXVH WKH FDXVDO VWUXFWXUH ZLWK WKH RUJDQL]DWLRQDO KLHUDUFK\ RU D SURFHVVIORZ GLDJUDP Performance Monitoring & Assumptions, Summary Indicators Evaluation Risks THEN IF AND 6HSDUDWH &DXVDO 7KLQNLQJ IURP 6HTXHQWLDO 7KLQNLQJ 'R QRW FRQIXVH FDXVDO WKLQNLQJ LIWKHP LQ RUGHU WR WKURXJK DQG E\ ZLWK VHTXHQWLDO WKLQNLQJ >ZKLFK VHTXHQFHV HYHQWV RYHU WLPH ILUVW IROORZLQJ DIWHU QH[W HWF @ $OVR GR QRW FRQIXVH FDXVDO WKLQNLQJ ZLWK FRUUHODWLYH WKLQNLQJ 8hhyÃUuvxvt TrrvhyÃUuvxvt DÃqrà Av DsëÃur Ayyvt Uutu 7rsr 7 6sr /RJIUDPH 7LSV (VWDEOLVK 3RLQWRI9LHZ 3RLQWRI9LHZ LV UHODWLYH ,W VWDWHV WKDW D SURMHFW LV DOZD\V IURP VRPHRQH·V 3RLQWRI9LHZ XVXDOO\ WKDW RI WKH LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ JURXS 8VH WKLV GHILQLWLRQ WR VHW WKH OHYHO ZLQGRZ RI WKH PDWUL[ t ec 7KH 2XWSXWV VKRXOG GHVFULEH WKLV JURXS·V GHOLYHUDEOHV DQG WKH Proj 3'2 VKRXOG GHILQH WKH GHVLUHG E\ WKH FOLHQW :ULWH 2EMHFWLYHV 2EMHFWLYHV DUH WKH UHVXOW RI DFWLYLWLHV XQGHUWDNHQ RYHU WLPH DQG UvÃÆ )ÃThrÃiwrpvrÃhÃsrÃpyrrqÃhpv WKH XVH RI UHVRXUFHV $Q REMHFWLYH LV D GHVLUHG RXWFRPH GHVFULEHG $FWLYLW\ 2EMHFWLYH EHIRUH WKH WLPH UHTXLUHG IRU DFWLRQ ,W LV LQWHQGHG WR DOWHU WKH Installing Installing System System system system installed installed FRXUVH RI HYHQWV 7KH /RJIUDPH WHOOV D VWRU\ DERXW WKH FDXVDO Last Day of Today Project UHODWLRQVKLS DPRQJ REMHFWLYHV DW D WLPH LQ WKH IXWXUH XVXDOO\ WKH time UvÃÆ!)ÃVrÃhà VWURQJÃhpvÃri ODVW GD\ RI WKH SURMHFW )RU WKLV UHDVRQ VWDWH REMHFWLYHV DV 6WURQJ :HDN FRPSOHWHG DFWLRQV LQ WKH IXWXUH $QG EHFDXVH FOHDU REMHFWLYHV vhyyrq hhtr pprq ruhpr rhqvphrq yvhvr GULYH FOHDU DFWLRQV PDNH REMHFWLYHV LPSOHPHQWDEOH ZLWK VWURQJ pqvhr rqprqÃsÃÃà DFWLRQ YHUEV r $YRLG WKH 7DXWRORJ\ T H E N ... T H E N ... A stren gthe ned in stitution. Th e in stitu tion 's p erfo rm an ce 7DXWRORJ\ ZHDNHQV SURMHFW GHVLJQ $YRLG UHVWDWLQJ 2XWSXWV DV in de live ring g ood s an d se rvice s is im prove d. WKH 3'2 XVLQJ GLIIHUHQW ZRUGV HJ EXLOG FDSDFLW\ DV DQ 2XWSXW VWUDWHJ\ LQ RUGHU WR KDYH D VWUHQJWKHQHG LQVWLWXWLRQ DV IF... IF ... D 3'2 OHYHO LPSDFW W e bu ild the institutio n's W e bu ild the institutio n capa city fo r de live ring g ood s ca pa city for deliverin g go od s a nd services a nd se rvice s 7 DX WRORJ \ 9 DOXH DG G H G 0DLQWDLQ ,QGHSHQGHQFH 'R QRW XVH LQGLFDWRUV DW RQH OHYHO WR PHDVXUH SHUIRUPDQFH DW DQRWKHU ,QGLFDWRUV GHVFULEH WKH UHVXOW 7KH\ GR QRW FDXVH LW Objective Indicator? Better Indicator Agriculture productivity Extension services improved. # tons; quality of sorghum increased. production. Transport services improved. Roads & bridges rehabilitated. X days of on-time bus service Health status improved. Improved access to health Infant mortality rates reduced services. from x to y School system improved. Institutional capacity built. # and quality of female graduates from secondary school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rrvp) Brrvp) HhprpvpÃhivyv HhprpvpÃhivyv Trpvsvp) Trpvsvp) AvphyÃqrsvpvÃrqprqÃiÃ#ÈÃiÃrqÃsÃwrpÃrhÃ! AvphyÃqrsvpvÃrqprqÃiÃ#ÈÃiÃrqÃsÃwrpÃrhÃ! Shvt) Shvt) 8vvphyvÃÃihvhyÃ$ ÈÃÃ&$È 8vvphyvÃÃihvhyÃ$ ÈÃÃ&$È QihivyvÃÃihvhyÃ$ ÈÃÃ&$È QihivyvÃÃihvhyÃ$ ÈÃÃ&$È HvvthvÃThrt) HvvthvÃThrt) 9rryvyrrÃrsprrÃhrtÃsÃhÃpyyrpv 9rryvyrrÃrsprrÃhrtÃsÃhÃpyyrpv 9rryvyrrÃpvphvÃphhvtÃÃurÃpvhyÃpÃs 9rryvyrrÃpvphvÃphhvtÃÃurÃpvhyÃpÃs hÃrhv hÃrhv 6$03/( /2*)5$0(6 %\ 6HFWRU à (QYLURQPHQW,QGXVWULDODQG&RPPXQLW\3ROOXWLRQ0DQDJHPHQW à (GXFDWLRQ8QLYHUVDO3ULPDU\(GXFDWLRQ²$3/ à (GXFDWLRQ3ULPDU\(GXFDWLRQ à +HDOWK6HFRQGDU\+HDOWK&DUH à ,QIUDVWUXFWXUH)UHHSRUW à 3LORW5 '3URMHFW à $JULFXOWXUH6HFWRU5HIRUP²$3/ à /RFDO*RYHUQPHQW&DSDFLW\'HYHORSPHQW6XESURMHFWV à :DWHU6XSSO\DQG6DQLWDWLRQ'HPDQG'ULYHQ6XE3URMHFWVIRU/RFDO7RZQV :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN 6DPSOH /RJIUDPHV Environment : Industrial and Community Pollution Management Narrative Summary Performance Indicators Monitoring & Evaluation Assumptions/Risk CAS Goals CAS Goal to Bank Mission 1 Environmental conditions are 1 % decrease in industrial 1 Industrial Pollution : EPA 1 Sustainable resource base improved pollution in contributes to sustainable 2 Soil erosion reduced by 5% in 2 Sample soil surveys in development in project 15 project ounties by end of project countries countries PY6 Development Objective D.O. to CAS Goal Targeted private sector 1 80% of companies receiving 1 Environmental agency audit 1 Host country governments urban/industry and poor grants decrease their industrial of industrial compliance enforce FNR policies and communities practice anti- pollution index by at least x maintain financial commitment pollution activities 2 75% of area communities 2 Community environmental 2 AIS and other donors, PVOs, practice improved assessment private sector and universities environmental management by make greater financial way of sanitation services, commitment to FNR drainage, etc. management Outputs Output to D.O. 1 The awareness of private 1.1 85% of targeted companies and 1.1 IEC reach survey based on Economic hardships do not sector and communities of the communities reached by the distribution undermine the understanding impact of their actions on the message of the environmental impact of environment and the need for projects environmental protection is increased 1.2 50% of the targeted companies 1.2 Survey of targeted Corporate profit motives do not and communities understand communities and circumvent pollution mitigation the importance of companies measures environmental protection and changes in practice needed 2 The industrial/ urban pollution 2.1 50% of urban grantees 2.1 Review of Grant records The grants are sufficient to grant is efficiently implemented implement grant programs on influence private sector with active support from the time and on budget with quality urban companies control 2.2 2.2 Review of Grant 80% of urban companies Applications targeted submit grant requests 3 The efficiency of the working 3.1 80% of compliance checks 3.1 Audit of compliance relationship between agencies meet the regulatory standards records is improved and supported by 3.2 80% of spot audit infringements 3.2 Spot audit check on legal frameworks received fines in line with infringements and fees : regulations Env, Affairs Office :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN Narrative Summary Performance Indicators Monitoring & Evaluation Assumptions/Risk AWARENESS Project management 1. Develop educational reports, campaign 2. Implement IEC on various media Progress reports 3. Develop a monitoring/assessment of IEC campaign Financial records 4. Train IEC personnel in Procurement Records management as needed GRANT 2.1 Establish grant funding for industrial pollution 2.2 Inform industry of the opportunity for grants 2.3 Provide technical assistance to qualifying companies on Awareness 25M application for grants Grant 50M 2.4 Establish approval criteria system for Agenies 10M grant making AGENCIES 3.1 Conduct institutional assessment of the agencies and their interrelationship 3.2 Undertake training for agencies 3.3 Develop central unit for continued support to agencies 3.4 Develop and implement regulations for improved environmental safety 6DPSOH /RJIUDPHV Education: Universal Primary Education - APL Narrative Summary Performance Indicators Monitoring & Evaluation Assumptions & Risks CAS Goal CAS Goal to Bank Reduction in poverty, 1 X% basic and Y% secondary school 1 Employment records Mission increased number of self- graduates employed at graduation & against education records after 12 months by EOP. reliant, productive members Macro-economic 2 X % Self-employment & # New situation remains of society. 2 Education statistics Business starts by graduates per publications, household stable. annum. surveys, census records 3 % secondary graduates enter post- 3. ibid secondary institutions by EOP. Program Purpose End of program Indicators D.O. to CAS Goal The Universal Primary 1. 30% of 3 to 6 year old children 1. ECD Review Budget allocation education system is effective in improve their cognitive and physical for education will formal and non formal abilities as a result of the ECD continue to education program increase in line with 2. Education records 2. 100% gross primary enrollment with government targets y% of all possible children of statutory (to 50% of GNP by age entering the school system by 2004) end of 10th year 3. Girls represent 50% of primary 3. Enrollment rates Policies are enrollment adhered to and 4. Learning outcomes improve by at 4. National Learning major stakeholders least 2% in French and math for Statistics through remain committed Grades 2,4,6 achievement tests to institutional reforms 5. % reduction in grade repetition rate 5. National Statistics Project Development Outcome/ Impact Indicators Objective The decentralized education 1. 8% increase in budget going to primary 1. Audit of financial The demographics in system framework developed schooling ( from 36% to 44%) with a ratio of allocations. the remaining regions under the project is effective in at least x/y/z/ to quality enhancement are similar to the test the test regions and ready for __/__/__ regions national implementation 2. Regional Review of 2. 80% of the regions are beginning decentralization process There are no other Phase One: Build the capacity implementation of the new decentralized incentives in the test of decentralized educational plans for education by the end of year three regions for invalid system and pilot test in 3 data to skew results regions In the test regions 3. Education figures in the 3. % increase in enrollment rates ( new of Phase Two: test regions the supply drive enrollment figures) Expand pilot to other regions 4. Education figures in the 4. % decrease in repetition rates for test and scale up test regions schools Phase Three: 5. Assessment of 5. % improvement in learning outcomes in attribution of learning National Scale Up the test area attributable to textbook outcomes and textbook distribution and assessed with the new use. assessment tools Outputs: Output Indicators Output to D.O. 1. Parents and Audit report on: communities send their 1.1 % of children using the access 1.1 Rehabilitated Demand for child children to local well- capacity within __ distance from classrooms. schooling is equipped schools and their homes by 06/10/03 1.2. New classrooms maintained and/or methods for inducing 1.2 % of parents in the test regions constructed. increased despite increased enrollment :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN Narrative Summary Performance Indicators Monitoring & Evaluation Assumptions & Risks based on access are who see increased access to middle 1.3.1 Computer labs continued tested. schools as a reason to send constructed. stagnation and children to primary schools by extreme poverty 5/10/02 in rural areas. 1.3 % of parents who are aware of newer latrines and facilities in the local schools and % who send children to school as a result 2. Optimal strategies for improving quality of 2.1 %of teachers in tests area who are 2.1. teacher survey education delivery are willing to change to a resource tested and ready for center strategy implementation 2.2 % of test areas where ECDE is 2.2 ECD report effective with y% agreeing to manage the ECD program 2.3 Sample audit of 2.3 % of in service teachers in the classroom use testing area who improve the quality of their delivery by 3. National and regional administrative bodies 3.1. Sample audit of 3.1 % of school administrations are able to successfully administrative following proper business manage the procedures processes educational system 3.2 Review of contracts 3.2 % of teachers who are hired on a based on real tie contract basis with % satisfied information from the with new system 3.3 Survey of local populations 3.3 % of information provide by community communities which is used in the participation decision making process 3.4 % of communities involved in 3.4 ibid providing information to the administrative system 6DPSOH /RJIUDPHV Education: Primary Education Improvement Narrative Summary Performance Indicators Monitoring & Evaluation Assumptions/Risk CAS Goal CAS Goal to Bank Mission 1 More and better trained 1.1 Transition rates from primary to 1.1. National Educational Independent 1 students enroll and secondary schools increases from Survey graduate from secondary 27% in 94/95 to 37% in 99/2000, schools and 45% in 2005 1.2 Percentage of students graduating 1.2. National Educational Independent from secondary schools increases Survey from 45% in 94/94 to 65% in 2005 1.3 Percentage of secondary school 1.3. National Educational Independent students achieving minimum Survey scores in standardized examinations increased from 31% in 94/95 to 56% in 2005 1.4 Proportion of girls enrolling in 1.4. National Educational Independent secondary schools increased from Survey 22% in 94/95 to 45% in 2005 Project Development Objective Outcome Indicators D.O. to CAS Goal More and better trained 1.1 Retention rates in primary schools 1.1. National Educational Independent 1 Students have support from students graduate from reduced from 25% in 94/95 to 18% Survey their families to enroll in primary schools at reduced in 2001 secondary schools and to costs with more gender continue their education equity 1.2 Percentage of students achieving 1.2.1 National Educational Independent 2 Secondary schools have minimum scores in standardized Survey excess capacity to provide examinations increased from 35% education from an increased in 94/95 to 52% in 2001 number of enrollments 1.3 8,000 additional students from the 1.3. National Educational Independent 10 regions with the lowest Survey coverage enroll in primary education schools (with at least 40% being girls) by 2001 1.4 Scholarships reduced from 1,000 1.4.1 National Educational Independent in 94/95 to zero in 2001 Survey 1.5 Per student primary education 1.5.1 National Educational Independent costs reduced by 25%, based on Survey 94/95 costs, by 2001 Outputs Output to D.O. 1 Adequate, quality classrooms 1.1 The student classroom ratio is : 1.1.1 Quality assessment of construction 1 Teachers support and adopt are used by students in the at least 20/1 in all areas. of classrooms new and improved curriculum, target groups pedagogic materials, and teaching methods 1.2 The walking distance to school is 1.2.1 Audit of walking distance from 2 Transportation system allows no more than x minutes in all areas villages and placement of schools children to get to schools in less than one hour 1.3 At least 90% capacity levels are 1.3. Review of school use 3 Children are well fed when reached in all schools built they arrive at school :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN Narrative Summary Performance Indicators Monitoring & Evaluation Assumptions/Risk 1.4 60% of the new additional 1.4. Review of allocation to girls 4 School directors and advisors dormitory rooms are allocated to implement skills developed girls by 1999 program 2 New and improved 2.1 85% of schools receiving new 2.1 Sampling of schools and use of 5 Children have support and curriculum and pedagogic textbooks and materials are in use textbooks incentives from their families materials are used in the in the classroom within 2 months to enroll in primary schools classrooms after delivery 2.2 The newly developed textbooks 2.2 Evaluation of quality of textbooks meet professional criteria for new and materials and pedagogic materials 3 New teaching methods are 3.1 At least 80% of teachers attending 3.1. Classroom evaluation audit used in the classroom the teacher's training use the new methods in their classroom work within x months of graduation from courses 3.2 3,500 teachers, 220 directors, and 3.2. Training documentation and 200 demagogic advisors pass level records II evaluation test 4 The administrative ability to 4.1 95% of attendees of the training 4.1. Training Level II Evaluation school directors and pass level II examinations upon documentation management is improved course completion 4.2 At least 75% of sample of 4.2. Training Level IV Evaluation attendees pass level IV evaluations 3 months after completion of course work. Component Activities Inputs Activity to Component CLASSROOM RENOVATIONS CLASSROOM RENOVATIONS $89M Project Management Documents Weather does not hinder building 1.1 Determine school needs for CURRICULUM REVISIONS $10M Procurement Reports construction and TEACHER TRAINING $15M Milestone Reports Political stability rehabilitation ADMINISTRATION $5M Financial Reports 1.2 Construct schools Incentive systems for teachers 1.3 Equip schools reflect new desired use of new methods CURRICULUM REVISIONS 2.1 Revise general primary education curriculum to incorporate new skills and requirements from secondary schools 2.2 Develop Pedagogic material to support the new curriculum 2.3 Distribute new curriculum 6DPSOH /RJIUDPHV Narrative Summary Performance Indicators Monitoring & Evaluation Assumptions/Risk implemented and pedagogic materials to 30% of the schools in 97, 60% in 98, and 100% in 99 2.4 Provide 521,000 textbooks students on a rental basis TEACHER TRAINING 3.1 Develop new teacher training methods and courses 3.2 Train 3500 teachers, 220 directors and 200 demagogic advisors in new teaching skills 3.3 Provide relevant materials needed fro teachers continued application of skills in the classroom ADMINISTRATION 4.1 Train 220 school directors in management and planning techniques 4.2 Train 150 central and 250 regional staff from public and private schools in management planning techniques :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN Health: Secondary Health Care Narrative Summary Performance Indicators Monitoring & Evaluation Assumptions/Risk CAS Goals CAS Goal to Bank Mission 1 Improved health status of rural 1. Reduced incidence of endemic diseases 1.1.1 World Health Organization 1 Improved health increases population by 5% annually for '93 to '99 Reports workers productivity 2 Mortality rate reduced to 120/1000 by 1.2.1 World Health Organization 2 Other social infrastructure 2000 Reports projects achieve their CAS 3 Morbidity rate reduced to 100/1000 by 1.3.1 World Health Organization Goals 2000 Reports Project Development Objective D.O. to CAS Goal The rural population uses 1.1 Number of patients served by local 1.1.1 Independent National 1 No major outbreaks of improved secondary health care hospitals increased by 20%: Study : MOH diseases 1.2 65% of the children in service areas are 1.2.1 Independent National Study 2 Current level of food security inoculated : MOH is maintained 1.3 70% of population in need of services use these services Outputs Output to D.O. 1 1 Served population can pay The quality of the health care 1.1 % of secondary health care centers with 1.1.1 MOH check on health care minimum services' fees infrastructure is improved adequate qualified staff (doctors, nurses) centers to meet all shift needs 1.2 % of health care centers with laboratories 1.2.1 Review of labs and and pharmacies to international pharmacies in health care standards centers 2 The needs of the community in 2.1 % of health care needs met by skilled 3.1.1 Review of needs against the area of health care services doctors, centers, and /or availability of services offered are reflected in the provision of relevant drugs services % of community involved in the process Review of participation in 2.2 of determining the needs of the 3.1.2 needs definition community 3 The use of new skills in 4.1 % of health care workers receiving 4.1.1 Sampling of the system provision of health care is training who apply the skills on the job increased % of the population using the centers who are satisfied with the quality of the care provided 4.1.2 Survey of users -- sampling 5 The project is efficiently 5.1 Supervision and financial requirements 5.1.1 Supervision reports implemented are met by the PMU in 100% of its duties 6DPSOH /RJIUDPHV 5.2 90% of implementation milestones are 5.2.1 Supervision reports achieved 80% of performance indicators are 5.3 5.2.2 Supervision reports tracked and provided to decision makers Component Activities INFRASTRUCTURE 1.1 Determine the current state of the health care facilities INFRASTRUCTURE $$$ Project Records 1.2 Develop a plan to improve COMMUNITY NEEDS $$$ Project Management Plans facilities along the lines of SERVICE PROV. $$$$ beds, pharmacy, labs, staff PROJECT MNG $$$ 1.3 Update labs 1.4 Build additional bedding and/.or centers COMMUNITY NEEDS 1.1 Develop a system for community participation 1.2 Conduct a needs assessment in each region 1.3 Integrate the community needs into the infrastructure plans SERVICE PROVISION 1.1 Determine the level of skills needed for effective health care and a training plan 1.2 Implement the training plan for nurses, doctors, and support staff 1.3 Develop administrative procedures to determine the quality of care PROJECT MANAGEMENT 4.1 Determine the skills of the PMU and identify weaknesses 4.2 Provide training or support to fill knowledge gaps 4.3 Provide necessary tools for staff in the areas of financial management, procurement, project management, and M&E :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN Infrastructure: Freeport Rehabilitation and Investment Narrative Summary Performance Indicators Monitoring & Evaluation Assumptions/Risk Sector-related CAS Goal: Sector Indicators: Sector / Country Reports: (from Goal to Bank Mission) National Freeport Contribution MOF Reports Economic Growth FX revenues : National employment. Incremental export earnings Project Development Obj: Outcome Indicators: Project Reports: (from Objective to Goal) 1. Freeport secures the following new businesses ( 1. Freeport records of new and Economic Development in other Private investors continue to which meet the investor criteria) intended investors and the analysis of parts of the Philippines continues remain and invest in the Operating Committed #Jobs investor criteria including env. Freeport. Services Manufacturing Tourism 2. Freeport maintains the following businesses 2. Business audit and employee records Operating Committed #Jobs Services Manufacturing Tourism 123 201 11,821 3. Survey results for a service 3 . Y% of the new and existing firms rate the scorecard Freeport satisfactory or higher on a service scorecard 4. Bi-annual Env. Audit 4. Air Emissions of x and y are maintained Water Quality ( BOD, COD, etc.), Forestry ­ Ground Cover Output for each component: Output Indicators: Project Reports: (from Outputs to Objective) 1. Integrated, reliable power 1.1 Reduce usage and live losses from 24% to 1.1 Audit of Merged Power Company distribution in Freeport is 12% by 2000 Records Promotions to draw investors are efficiently provided with 1.2 Increase in billing for power with a billing 1.2 ibid successful sufficient maintenance efficiency of 85% by 2000 and 95% by 2004. support in place to meet 1.3 Reduce administrative consumption for growing demands 1.3 ibid The Government passes and electricity from 40% to 10% by 2000 to 4% by supports necessary regulations 2005 that are investor "friendly" 1.4 ibid 1.4 Frequency of outages is decreased to x from a level of y with a maximum power outage Confidence in Philippine 2. Treated water is duration of ___ hours by mm,dd,yy, economic and political stability efficiently and remains strong consistently provided to 2.1 Chlorinated water is provided to the population 2.1 Audit of Water Company consumers in freeport (base demand of 66.4 Mld) with the following Records through the public private Industries comply with gradations : partnership environmental regulations U $12M water sales by 2000, $value of 204.1Mld by 2005 and Freeport remains competitive US$ value of 230.2 by 2010, with FRR of against other freeports 14.8% 2.2 Audit of Water Company 2.2 Operational efficiency of the water company as Records measured unaccounted for water of ___% by mm,dd,yy Time between water leakage and repair reduced from x to y by mm,dd,yy with an activity cost not to exceed $__ per call ( or % of revenue per repair) 6DPSOH /RJIUDPHV Narrative Summary Performance Indicators Monitoring & Evaluation Assumptions/Risk 3. A safe and operationally 3.1 Travel time on major roads decreases from x to 3.1 Roads Safety and Efficiency efficient physical access y km/hour in heavy traffic times by mm,dd,yy Survey to the secured area for 3.2 The accident rate at major intersections 3.2 Accident Reports : police industrial and commercial decreases from x to y and on major development is in place thoroughfares from z to zz by mm,dd,yy and maintained 3.3 Maintenance Schedule Reports 3.3 Road repairs are completed within x days of identification with minimal disruption in traffic patterns 4. The necessary 4.1 The time for custom clearance is reduced from 4.1 Custom Reports supporting structure and x days to y days by mm,dd,yy skills to efficiently 4.2 X% of infrastructure services are provided by 4.2 Infrastructure Reports administer the growth in the private sector by mm,dd,yy increasing y% a freeport are successfully year to a final level of z% by mm,dd,yy 4.3 Freeport operational reports transferred to Freeport 4.3 Freeport rate 95 of above on all elements of its balanced scorecard ii by mm,dd,yy 5.1 Assessment records 5. The effect on the 5.1 Investor environmental assessments covering environment of the 5.2 Periodic Reports y% of investors are conducted within _ time Freeport is efficiently 5.3 Social Scientist Surveys period with x% of companies complying with monitored, regulated and environmental standards beginning mm,dd,yy, managed by the 5.2 Information on changes in the ground water are Environmental Center feedback into the water management with and the interests of the periodic checks x times per month beginning native Population are xx,xx,xx protected 5.3 The communities within the native Populations receive positive benefits from the freeport beginning mm,dd,yy COMPONENTS INPUTS MOV Assumptions The major areas of work for the The inputs are the financial amounts allocated to Project reports 5 components would be added each component. Not category of expenditure. to this area. This would include a list of appx. 2-10 main activity groups. :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN Pilot Project: R&D Portfolio Management Narrative Summary Performance Indicators Monitoring & Evaluation Important Assumptions CAS Goals CAS Goal to Bank Mission The productivity of the private Technological value added to Independent impact assessment 1 National transportation sector on an international products, services and study infrastructure is modernized to processes increased by 15% competitiveness scale is become competitive by PY6 improved 2 Marketing campaign is effective 3 National companies are willing to collaborate among themselves Development Objective D.O. to CAS Goal Private enterprises adapt 1. At least 5 of commercially 1 R&D documentation 1 Financial and economic reforms foreign technologies for TQM feasible prototypes and continue and contribute to the R&D production scale processes are 2 Market analysis of products and efforts adapted by 10% of more of the services design capability area private enterprises available internally 2. At least 80 new companies in 1 R&D tests and results targeted industries implement 3 Constitutional reforms continue TQM processes per year beginning in PY2 Outputs Output to D.O. 1 The ability of private enterprise 1.1 At least 50 new companies in 1.1 Application documentation 1 Financial and economic incentives to manage for quality is targeted areas start ISO 9000 are sufficient to motivate improved application process per year by institutions and individuals PY1 1.2 At least 50% of the companies 1.2 Certification documentation 2 Support to applied R&D is applying for ISO 9000 maintained certification are certified per year beginning in PY2 1.3 At least 80% of mid and top 1.3 Evaluation records 3 Private companies are willing to level managers from targeted actively participate and collaborate industrial sectors attending with quality and management training pass level II TQM, improvement programs strategic planning, and project Legal, constitutional, and management evaluations per regulatory reforms continue as year beginning in PY2 planned to create an enabling environment 2 Adequate incentives are in 2.1 At least 5 companies contribute 2.1 Patent applications, journal 4 Graduates formed by the project place to enable applied R&D to significant research and publications and industrial are employed by academic development within the processes publications institutions and continue their industries targeted is provided studies or engage in R&D Component Activities, or are employed by private R&D centers 3 The quality of human resources 3.1 At least 1 new research leader 3.1 Scholarships, fellowship 5 New private R&D centers are in the area of R&D in targeted formed in targeted areas per applications, graduation created in response to private industries is improved on a year beginning in PY2 records sector demand 6DPSOH /RJIUDPHV Narrative Summary Performance Indicators Monitoring & Evaluation Important Assumptions demand 3.2 At least 60 new Ph.D.'s formed 3.2 Scholarships, fellowship in targeted areas per year by applications, graduation PY2 records 3.3 At least 20 new researchers 3.3 Scholarships, fellowship formed in targeted areas per applications, graduation year beginning in PY2 records 4 R&D outcomes are successfully 4.1 At least 4 nation-wide 4.1 Journals, patents, official produced through partnership mechanisms for bringing publications, grants and loans programs together public, private sector, processed scientific community and R&D centers to develop collaborative efforts by PY2 5 Quality R&D support services 5.1 At least 90% of private 5.1 Survey of centers are provided to enterprises in enterprise users surveyed are the geographic area in an satisfied with the quality of the efficient manner responsiveness and services of the support centers At least 20% of targeted 5.2 companies in the area of new rehabilitated centers increase their use of the support services :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN $3/ $JULFXOWXUDO 6HFWRU 5HIRUP Narrative Summary Performance Indicators Monitoring & Evaluation Assumptions CAS Goal to Bank CAS Goal: 1. Avergae household incomes are x%higher than the baseline by 2020 1. Rural household survey Mission or national statistics Revitalization of the rural 2. The share of the population nunder the poverty line decrease by x% economy to increase rural by 2020 2. National statistics incomes, reduce poverty and reinforce national stability Program Purpose En d of program indicators Production and The rural poor effectively 1) Average crop yields per hectare in the project areas z % 1. Survey of project area effective utilization of employ the resources on higher than the baseline resources continue which they depend for livelihood in raising The political climate productivity, primarily land remains stable and labor 2) Average returns per labor unit in the project areas are z % 2. Ibid higher than the baseline Weather conditions PHASE I: 2001-2004 remain favorable for 3 Average crop yields on farmed marshland / hill-sides are x%, Create the institutional, 3. Ibid production y%, and z% higher than the baseline by the end of phase I, II, technical, and infrastructure and III, respectively; maintenance capacities needed to support the 4. ibid generation and adoption of 4 The unit costs per hectare of export crops in the project efficient cropping and post- areas are x%, y%, and z% lower than the baseline by the end harvest technologies and of phase I, II, and III, respectively; test their effectiveness. PHASE II: 2005-2009 Accelerate the intensification and commercialization of agricultural production. PHASE III: 2010-2014 Promote the diversification of economic activities in rural areas and expand the productive employment of available resources. Project Development Outcome / Impact Indicators: Objective 1) The quantities of modern inputs used per capita and 1. MOA survey of pilot The subsequent Rural poor in the pilot per hectare in the project areas are x% higher than the areas phases achieve areas use modern inputs, baseline by 2003 their objectives including marshlands, for 2) The quantities and shares of marketed crop output 2. Ibid diversified production and per household in the project areas are x% higher than The capacity employment, supported the baseline by 2003 developed in this by sustainable services phase is 3) The total area of rehabilitated farmed marshlands 3. ibdi maintained and hill-sides have reached a and b ha, respectively by throughout the 2003 other phases 6DPSOH /RJIUDPHV Narrative Summary Performance Indicators Monitoring & Evaluation Assumptions Project Outputs Output Indicators Market Prices are an 1. Farmer's groups' and other 1.1 At least x farmer groups in the pilot area demonstrate incentive to produce. 1.1 Sample farmer NGOs/firms' in the pilot areas sufficient skills for the management of marshland crops; ability to manage marshlands 1.2 % of sites in pilot area with agreed cropping patterns, assessment of Climatic conditions has improved ( in the pilot irrigation and drainage schedules, and maintenance marshland skills remain favorable area) programs, and % application of these patterns, schedules, and programs. 1.2 Assessment of pilot The prevailing legal 1.3 At least x national firms/NGOs submit grant applications region and regulatory for technical studies, works and on-farm development activities framework is conducive 1.3 NGO organizational to increased farmer records in MOA investment in land and water infrastructure 2. Effective commercial 2.1 % of CTSEs providing quality support to the farmer 2.1 Sample assessment and technical support to owners There are sufficient export crop farmers in the of the quality of human resources and pilot areas is provided by support to farmers technical capacity to CTSEs develop and 2.2 % of owner farmers who are satisfied with the quality of 2.2 2.2 Farmer survey adequately maintain the support provided by the CTSEs of CTSE the rehabilitated land and water infrastructure 3. Adequate knowledge and 3.1 85% of target farmers reached by PASDO services skills for improved farming 3.1 PASDO records practices are disseminated to 3.2 Evaluation scores The on-going pilot 3.2 40% of farmer's association members who demonstrate farmers through research and project on agr. And adequate retention of extension services "learning of extension workers extension services rural market objectives" 3.3 Farmer survey development will provide workable 3.3 50% of farmers reached by PASDO are satisfied with solutions with respect the services provided ft the promotion of private sector based 4. The ability of local 4.1 Sample of systems of advisory communities to maintain community and private services for small 4.4 At least x local communities and y private transport and post harvest operators maintenance holder farrmes operators meet quality standards on management of equipment and infrastructure local transport ( time to repair, # of unnecessary is improved maintenance etc.) Low cost technologies 4.2 Records of 4.5 Total unit of intermediary means of transportation exist on- shelf or can infrastructure be introduced at developed by communities increases to x reasonable costs to promote off farm productive activities The regulatory environment for domestic trading will remain adequate :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN Narrative Summary Performance Indicators Monitoring & Evaluation Assumptions Activities Inputs Activity to Output Rehabilitation of farmed marshland and hill side areas Project Management The level of unit cost Reports of production is the 1.1 Build small scale most important drainage and irrigation Marshland Rehab. $35M Financial Reports determinant of export 1.2 Conduct soil and competitiveness natural resources Export Promotion : $10M Procurement Reports conservation R&D and Other donors provide infrastructure Support Services/ Delivery $5M technical and 1.3 Provide advisory institutional support Small Scale Infrastructure $7M services on cropping to agricultural and water management exporters technologies 1.4 Train farmer groups The regulatory and other target framework of operators in marketing and the construction, movement of goods management, and across local markets maintenance of land remains adequate infrastructure 1.5 Assist produced The relationship organizatiosn and between farmers and community groups in local administration development with respect to access and use of Promotion of export marshland is agricultural services transparent and 2.1 Provide advisory builds trust around services on production project activities and post harvest technologies to farmers and operations 2.2 Conduce post harvest R&D 2.3 Develop and implement export crop farmer organization capacity building 2.4 Establish farmer owned commercial support entities Support to Agr. Services Delivery System 3.1 Conduct adaptive research on cropping, conservation and post harvest techniques 3.2 Train farmer organizations on participatory research and extension services delivery 3.3 Provide advise to operators willing to invest in services delivery 6DPSOH /RJIUDPHV Narrative Summary Performance Indicators Monitoring & Evaluation Assumptions Small scale rural infrastructure development 4.1 Implement conservation and transport infrastructure development and maintenance activities 4.2 Provide assistance to operations 4.3 Acquire IMT 4.4 Construct IMT :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN /RFDO *RYHUQPHQW &DSDFLW\ %XLOGLQJ WKURXJK 6XE 3URMHFWV Narrative Summary Performance Indicators Monitoring & Evaluation Assumptions Sector-related CAS Goal: Sector Indicators: Sector / Country (from Goal to Bank Reports: Mission) National Survey Strengthen public policy and % of population in transitioning TOWNs whose incomes implementation capacity increases % Project Development Obj: Outcome Indicators: Project Reports: (from Objective to Goal) Resource poor TOWNs 1. x% of participating TOWNs rate their ability to better plan 1. Survey of TOWNs effectively undertake and implement investment programs ( control systems, TOWNs unable to economic development in a planning, supervision) as satisfactory or better, attributing obtain MDF support are self reliant manner this to project by xx,xx,xx able to get this support from other donors 2. % of participating TOWNs increase their own revenue 2. National Monitoring (USAID, ADB) share of all current municipal revenues by at least x% by System xx,xx,xx 3. Ibid 3. % of participating TOWN sub-projects achieve their economic development9 outcome and maintain the impact by xx,xx,xx 4. Ibid 4. % of participating income class 1-3 TOWNs' satisfactorily achieve the social and environmental objectives of their sub-projects by xx,xx,xx Output for each Output Indicators: Project Reports: (from Outputs to component: Objective) 1.1 % of TOWNs successfully implement their sub-projects 1.1. MDFO records 1. TOWNs in 3rd and 6th with up-front indication of the economic or social benefit The officials who were income classes of the sub-project and a system in place to measure the part of the project successfully implement outcome of the project upon completion by xx,xx,xx intervention retain their local sub-projects) in an positions or influences 1.2 % of category A and B sub-projects which meet 1.2 . Env Audits Local environmentally sound environmental impact requirements consul manner 1.3 % of sub projects with sufficient O&M plans and 1.3 pre and post reports budgetary allocations to implement them by xx,xx,xx to MDFO 2.1 % of TOWN receiving training which submit sub-projects 2.1 Review of which are satisfactorily prepared by xx,xx,xx subproject proposals 2. The service delivery 2.2 % of TOWN participants receiving a post training review and economic grade of satisfactory by 2.2 Training Records development management of 3.1 Tax records à 6DPSOH /RJIUDPHV Narrative Summary Performance Indicators Monitoring & Evaluation Assumptions TOWNs is improved Audit 3.1 % increase in tax revenues and billing of participating TOWNs in RPTA 3.2 % of TOWNs with proper financial disclosure and public 3.3 Audit of national audits access by EOP 3. The governance, transparency, and fiscal 3.3 % of TOWNs monitored by national government performance of TOWNs is improved 3.1 Records 4.1 Average sub-project processing time within MDFO from appraisal to disbursement is ___ by xx,xx,xx 3.2 Financial Records 4.2 Loan recovery of MDFO is at least x% by xx,xx,xx Survey 4.3 x% of TOWNs are aware of the benefits of LOGOFIND 4. Long-term credit and and access the funds beginning xx,xx,xx grants for economic and social development projects is efficiently provided to non- creditworthy TOWNs by MDF Components Project Reports The government remains committed to 1 Subprojects Subprojects : $95.7 Financial Reports and strengthening and Audits TOWN Training and Capacity Building : $8.3 reorienting the MDF Procurement Reports TOWN Resource Mobilization and Monitoring : $16.5 The TOWN financing 2 TOWN Training and MDF Reorganization and Strengthening ; $12.2 policy framework is Capacity Building implemented Demand if adequate for TOWN projects TOWN Resource Mobilization and the TOWNs are and Monitoring : able to quickly prepare and implement projects MDF Reorganization and Strengthening ; The turnover of elected official and staff in TOWNS is low The professional capacity of the project officer, set up initially in MOF is postive. :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN :DWHU 6XSSO\ DQG 6DQLWDWLRQ 'HPDQG 'ULYHQ 6XE 3URMHFWV IRU /RFDO 7RZQV Narrative Summary Performance Indicators Monitoring & Evaluation Assumptions Living standards in 1. 90% of urban population has access to safe drinking 1. World Development 1. Government Philippine towns and cities water. Report and other adherence to its improved. 3. In the 20 largest cities outside Manila 80% of internationally compiled strategy, as stated in wastewater is collected and treated. documents on basic the NEDA Board urban service Resolutions, remains provisioning. committed 3. Benchmark performance Program Purpose: End-of-Program Indicators: Program reports: (from Purpose to Goal) Customers in about 200 1. % of consumers in the municipalities satisfied with: 1. Sample consumer 1. Lessons learned TOWNs use safe and - water quality survey from the APL process reliable water and sanitation - wastewater collection generate support in the services, which are - wastewater disposal national government, managed on commercial and among other major principles and are 2. Unit price charged by informal water vendors in donors. environmentally sustainable participating towns not more than 10% higher than prices charged by the water utilities 2. Survey Phase I (APL1): Proto-typing and testing a demand-based 3. Sustainability: Private sector involvement evident in framework, that provides 50% by lease/concession contracts. participating TOWNs with sustained water and sanitation services, and provides incentives for private sector participation 3. Review of contracts . Phase II (APL2): Based on the lessons learned from APL1, adjusting and modifying the project design, and applying it to about 100 TOWNs in order to create a sufficiently large market to attract a PSP-led water operators industry. Phase III (APL3): APL2 generates sufficient private sector operator interest to attract private financing of water supply infrastructure. This would enable a further scaling up in TOWN coverage, with the role of DBP changing from a retailer to a wholesaler of financing to private sector banks interested in water supply and sanitation infrastructure investments. Project Development Outcome / Impact Indicators: Project reports: (from Objective to Objective: Purpose) Consumers in approximately 1. % of consumers who use the water provided by the 1. Household survey in 1. Successor TOWN 100 participating towns are towns and pay associated fees the participating towns administrations will satisfied with and use clean, remain committed to sustainable water supply 2. At least 50% of households without sanitation (in maintaining and sanitation services participating towns) improve sanitation facilities. 2. Consumer surveys agreements with and public performance regard to tariffs and 3. Average of 80% of consumers satisfied with service audits honoring long-term performance in participating TOWNs contracts with the 3. ibid private sector for 4. Conflicts between customers, town governments and operations and Operators are resolved without resort to contract maintenance 6DPSOH /RJIUDPHV Narrative Summary Performance Indicators Monitoring & Evaluation Assumptions cancellations in at least 70% of PSP contracts. Output from each Output Indicators: Project reports: (from Outputs to component: Objective) 1. Quality water supply is 1. At least 40 additional towns have lease and 1. Review of lease and 1. Newly elected provided to participating management contracts management contracts TOWN administrations towns by operators(through will remain committed management contracts or 2. At least 16 hours of water per day available for APL1 to agreements between lease) and APL2 towns 2. Audit of service to the project and towns communities; 3. 50% of the participating TOWNs successfully outsource operations and maintenance activities to private operators through lease/concession contracts. 3. Review of contracts and outsourcing 4. 4. At least 60% of households in a community connected to the water supply system 4. Review of barangay connections 2. 2. The DBP is able to 1. DBP PMO unit processes loans/grants in x days 1. processing records 2. IRA allocations to effectively process projects TOWNs will continue 2. NDF disbursements commence 2. disbursement records 3. DILG-PMO commitment to play facilitative role remains 3. Minimum negative 1. x% of negative environmental impacts due to drainage 1. Environmental audit impacts from the increase in are managed sampling of completed wastewater are mitigated projects x months after up through on-site sanitation and running and micro-drainage system Project Components / Sub- Inputs: (budget for each component) Project reports: (from Components to components: Outputs) (Phase I) DBP-PMO and DILG 1. DBP-PMO is Operator Support $10M through: established at by Board 1. Operator Support and DBP Loan $85M ·Semi-annual progress presentation Awareness Sanitation $15M reports 2. DBP-PMO and DILG ·Supervision mission work effectively in 2. DBP Loan Mechanism reports preparing second batch ·Project Implementation for implementation in 3. Sanitation and Plan 1999 Community Awareness 3. Co-financing of technical assistance is available on time :RUOG %DQN /RJIUDPH 0HWKRGRORJ\ +DQGERRN