efficiency of fuel use;Massachusetts Institute of Technology;research and development funding;reduction in fuel consumption;food and agriculture organization;decline ...  See More + n fuel consumption;success and failure;cost materials;greenhouse gas emission;consumption of fuel;demand for wood;urban middle class;household energy sector;kilogram of wood;acute respiratory illness;cost of fuel;emission of carbon;cost of stove;household energy expenditures;gas and electricity;layer of bureaucracy;basic energy need;energy research institute;efficient cooking stove;formal sector entrepreneur;commitment of funds;exchange of information;measures of efficiency;traditional stove;fuel saving;biomass fuel;biomass stove;field testing;charcoal stove;modern fuel;Cash Income;consumer need;wood resource;environmental benefit;power output;efficient stove;fuel efficiency;external support;traditional biomass;heat transfer;urban poor;copyright notice;oil shock;woodfuel price;consumer survey;market force;efficiency improvement;rural area;smoke exposure;energy ladder;biomass resource;smoke abatement;Global Warming;local condition;government pay;urban family;payback period;present value;local artisans;field conditions;service company;discount rate;user surveys;maximum benefit;low-income household;middle-income family;replacement parts;international community;soil fertility;publicity campaign;focus group;commercial production;informal sector;piece rate;traditional use;central planning;Technical Training;data gathering;alternative use;international donor;energy technology;space heating;air control;donor assistance;market dynamic;government support;dual-use stove;information access;government subsidy;energy transition;cooking fuel;Socialist economies;laboratory testing;health benefit;qualitative indicator;government contribution;environmental problem;editorial comments;full-time employment;commercial success;potential users;operations research;market chain;local program;field trip;arid region;agricultural residue;traditional fuel;local circumstance;retail marketing;urban consumption;macroeconomic condition;cooking device;daily consumption;respiratory disease;saving money;high power;thermal efficiency;deforested area;individual artisans;potential energy;air pollutant;noncommercial purposes;carbon monoxide;profit motive;nitrogen oxide;local preference;household stove;scientific evidence;consumer preference;adequate incentives;informal labor;wood stove;parental smoking;quantitative estimate;cooking practice;hill area;high biomass;health effect;rural populace;yearly saving;healthy environment;clay stove;individual household;fuel option;fuel purchase;biomass harvest;outer surface;energy resource;sustainable level;development policy;basic requirement;safety feature;donor support;direct beneficiaries;household expenditure;fuel substitution;direct subsidy;Direct Subsidies;non-governmental organization;energy conservation;conventional wisdom;carbon dioxide;household use;smoke emission;increasing urbanization;cash outlays;air flow;unrealistic expectation;efficiency gain;rural woman;local pressure;manufacturing process;cash expenditure;wood use;cash saving;combustion efficiency;greenhouse effect;crop residue;financial resource;economic efficiency;economic equity;insulation material;fuelwood consumption; ;  Economic policy; Economics; Credit policy; Auctions; Wage price policy; Market economy; Macroeconomics; Developing countries; Fiscal gap; Development; Stoves; Policy reform  See Less -