OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN REPUBLIC OF BOTSWANA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS ROADS DEPARTMENT Botswana Integrated Transport Project PERFORMANCE BASED ROAD CONTRACT (OPRC) (ASSET MANAGEMENT CONTRACT) FOR DESIGN, REHABILITATION/IMPROVEMENT/, NETWORK PERFORMANCE (ROUTINE MAINTENANCE) AND PERIODIC MAINTENANCE WORKS PACKAGE 1: ROAD SECTIONS A2-4 – ROUNDABOUT A10/A2-KANYE WEST JUNCTION (6.87 KM), A2-5- KANYE WEST JUNCTION-JWANENG ROUNDABOUT (72.71 KM), A10-1 JUNCTION A10/B111 DIRECTION TO MMANKGODI- CHANGE 2 LANES/3 LANES- CHANGE 3 LANES/ 2 LANES (2.05 KM), A103-3- CHANGE 3 LANES/ 2 LANES- ROUNDBOUT A10/A2 KANYE (1.75 KM). RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN REPORT PACKAGE 1 March 2017 FINAL REVISION RAP-PACK.1-Mar 2017 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN INDEX 0. SUMMARY DATA OF RAP ................................................................................................................... 8 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 8 A10-1 ROAD ............................................................................................................................................... 13 A10-1-AR1-C ACCESS ROAD ................................................................................................................... 13 A10-1-AR2-A ACCESS ROAD ................................................................................................................... 14 A10-1-AR2-B ACCESS ROAD ................................................................................................................... 14 A2-4-AR1 ACCESS ROAD......................................................................................................................... 15 A2-5 ROAD ................................................................................................................................................. 15 A2-5-AR1 ACCESS ROAD......................................................................................................................... 15 A2-5-AR2 ACCESS ROAD......................................................................................................................... 15 A2-5-AR3 ACCESS ROAD......................................................................................................................... 16 A2-5-AR4 ACCESS ROAD......................................................................................................................... 16 2. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................... 17 3. POLICY, LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR LAND ACQUISITION AND COMPENSATION ............................................................................................................................... 19 3.1. RELEVANT LEGISLATION.............................................................................................................. 19 3.1.1. Tribal Land Act of 1968 ...................................................................................................... 19 3.1.2. Tribal Land (Amendment) Act (Cap.32:02 of 1993) ........................................................... 20 3.1.3. Environmental Assessment Act of (2011) .......................................................................... 20 3.1.4. Monuments and Relics Act 2001 ........................................................................................ 20 3.2. RELEVANT POLICIES .................................................................................................................... 21 3.2.1. Planning and Environmental Impact Assessment of Road Infrastructure, Guideline No. 5 of September 2001 .................................................................................. 21 3.2.2. Ministry of Lands and Housing Compensation Guidelines ................................................. 21 3.2.3. Land Rights and Entitlements............................................................................................. 21 3.2.4. Land Acquisition Procedures .............................................................................................. 22 3.2.5. Eligibility criteria for entitlements ........................................................................................ 24 3.2.6. Methods of valuing, and validating the census of affected assets section ........................ 24 3.2.7. Organizational procedures for delivery of entitlement ........................................................ 24 3.3. INSTITUTIONS ................................................................................................................................ 25 3.3.1. Ministry of Works and Transport......................................................................................... 25 3.3.2. Ministry of Lands and Housing ........................................................................................... 25 3.3.3. Department of Roads.......................................................................................................... 25 3.3.4. Department of Lands .......................................................................................................... 26 3.3.5. Department of Environmental Affairs .................................................................................. 26 3.3.6. Department of Town and Regional Planning ...................................................................... 26 3.3.7. The Land Board .................................................................................................................. 26 3.3.8. Land Tribunal ...................................................................................................................... 26 3.3.9. Compensation Assessment Committee ............................................................................. 27 3.4. WORLD BANK INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT POLICY .......................................................... 27 3.4.1. Impacts Covered ................................................................................................................. 28 3.4.2. Required Measures ............................................................................................................ 28 3.4.3. Special/Vulnerable Groups ................................................................................................. 30 3.4.4. Criteria for Eligibility ............................................................................................................ 30 3.5. GAP ANALYSIS BETWEEN THE NATIONAL COMPENSATION GUIDELINES AND THE WORLD BANK OP4.12 ................................................................................................................... 30 3.5.1. Gaps between the National Compensation Guidelines and the World Bank OP4.12 ...... 30 3.5.2. World Bank OP4.12 Policy Objectives ............................................................................... 30 3.5.3. Compensation Guidelines Objectives ................................................................................. 31 3.5.4. Operational implications of the identified gap .................................................................... 31 3.5.5. Measures to fill the Gap ...................................................................................................... 31 4. THE RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK, DECEMBER 2008; ROADS DEPARTMENT....... 38 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................. 38 5.1. BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT..................................................................................................... 38 5.2. OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................................... 39 5.3. TECHNICAL PROJECT SCOPE ..................................................................................................... 39 5.4. PROJECT AREA .............................................................................................................................. 39 5.5. PROJECT SCALE ............................................................................................................................ 41 5.6. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION AND STANDARDS ........................................................................... 43 5.6.1. Standard cross section ....................................................................................................... 44 5.6.2. Bus Bays and Rest Areas ................................................................................................... 44 5.6.3. Fencing ............................................................................................................................... 44 5.7. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONAL PHASE .............................................................................. 45 5.8. PROJECT SCHEDULE AND PHASING DETAILS .......................................................................... 45 5.9. SOCIAL ASPECTS .......................................................................................................................... 46 5.9.1. Improving living conditions .................................................................................................. 46 5.9.2. Employment ........................................................................................................................ 46 3 5.9.3. Widening of road reserve – existing roads ......................................................................... 46 5.10. SCOPE OF OPRC SERVICES ........................................................................................................ 47 5.11. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT .................................................................................. 48 5.12. CLEARED STRIP AND ROAD RESERVE ...................................................................................... 48 6. SOCIO-ECONOMIC STUDY ............................................................................................................... 54 6.1. OVERALL SOCIAL STATUS: NATIONAL AND SOUTHERN DISTRICT COMPARISONS ........... 54 6.2. DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT: SOUTHERN DISTRICT .................................................................... 56 6.2.1. Geography and Settlement ................................................................................................. 56 6.2.2. Economic Activity ................................................................................................................ 56 6.2.3. Population Characteristics .................................................................................................. 58 6.2.4. Age and Sex Structure ........................................................................................................ 59 6.2.5. Settlement Patterns ............................................................................................................ 59 6.2.6. Tourism ............................................................................................................................... 61 6.2.7. Revised National Policy on Destitute Persons, 2002 ......................................................... 63 6.2.8. Early Childhood Care and Education Policy, 2001 ............................................................. 63 6.2.9. Short Term Plan of Action for Orphans (STPA): 1999-2003 .............................................. 63 6.2.10. VDC Guidelines, 2001 ....................................................................................................... 63 6.2.11. Health ................................................................................................................................. 64 6.2.12. HIV&AIDS .......................................................................................................................... 65 7. POTENTIAL IMPACTS ....................................................................................................................... 67 7.1. AFFECTED POPULATIONS ............................................................................................................ 67 7.2. IDENTIFICATION OF LIKELY SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS ................................................................ 70 7.3. CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS ........................................................................................................... 72 7.4. OPERATIONAL STAGE IMPACTS ................................................................................................. 73 7.5. IMPACT MITIGATION THROUGH ROAD RE-ALIGNMENT........................................................... 73 7.6. MITIGATION MEASURES ............................................................................................................... 75 7.6.1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 75 7.6.2. Specific Mitigation Activities: Construction ......................................................................... 75 7.6.3. Specific Mitigation Activities: Operations ............................................................................ 76 7.7. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................... 76 7.7.1. Summary Impacts ............................................................................................................... 76 7.7.2. Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................................................. 77 8. SCOPE OF THE RESETTLEMENT PLAN ......................................................................................... 77 9. CONTENTS AND SCOPE OF THE RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN ............................................ 78 4 10. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR PROJECT AFFECTED PERSONS AND LIKELIY CATEGORIES ... 78 11. CENSUS OF THE AFFECTED PERSONS AND VALUATION OF ASSETS .................................... 80 11.1. METHODOLOGY USED TO CARRY OUT THE IDENTIFICATION OF PAPS ............................... 80 AFFECTED ASSETS ................................................................................................................................. 83 11.1.1. Main roads (A10 - A2) ........................................................................................................ 85 11.1.2. Access Roads .................................................................................................................... 85 11.1.3. Questionnaires ................................................................................................................... 92 11.2. SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ................................................................................................................ 95 12. ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES AFFECTED .......................................................................................... 96 12.1. MITIGATION MEASURES FOR THE IDENTIFIED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ......................... 102 13. CONSULTATIONS WITH PROJECT AFFECTED PERSONS ........................................................ 105 13.1. PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS ...................................................................... 105 13.2. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN ....................................................................................... 105 13.2.1. Objectives of the Stakeholder Engagement Plan ............................................................ 105 13.2.2. Stakeholder Engagement Approach Used ...................................................................... 106 13.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis and Mapping ................................................................................. 106 13.3. AFFECTED COMMUNITIES .......................................................................................................... 107 13.4. DIRECTLY AFFECTED INDIVIDUALS AND INTERESTED ORGANISATIONS (IAPS) .............. 108 13.4.1. Consultation Methodologies Used ................................................................................... 108 13.4.2. Public Consultation Meetings .......................................................................................... 109 13.4.3. Stakeholder Meetings ...................................................................................................... 110 13.4.4. Interviews with Land Owners and Other IAPs ................................................................. 111 13.4.5. Focus Group Discussions ................................................................................................ 111 13.4.6. Disclosure of Project Information ..................................................................................... 111 13.5. RESULTS OF THE STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PROCESS ............................................... 111 13.5.1. Summary of the Public Consultation Meetings ................................................................ 111 13.5.2. Meetings Advertisement .................................................................................................. 112 13.5.3. Consultation Proceedings and Attendance...................................................................... 112 13.5.4. Summary of the Stakeholder Consultations .................................................................... 115 13.5.5. Other Technical Consultations and Data Collection ........................................................ 116 13.6. CURRENT CONSULTATION ACTIVITIES .................................................................................... 116 14. INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND PROCEDURES FOR GRIEVANCE REDRESS................................................................................................................... 116 14.1. IMPLEMENTATION ....................................................................................................................... 116 5 14.1.1. During project preparation: .............................................................................................. 119 14.1.2. During project implementation: ........................................................................................ 119 14.2. GRIEVANCE REDRESS ................................................................................................................ 121 15. VALUATION PROCESS AND VALUATION APPROACH .............................................................. 123 16. DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATION AND OTHER RESETTLEMENT ASSISTANCE TO BE PROVIDED ........................................................................................................................................ 125 17. TIMETABLE ...................................................................................................................................... 128 18. COST AND BUDGET ....................................................................................................................... 131 18.1. A10-1 ROAD .................................................................................................................................. 132 18.2. A10-1-AR1-C ACCESS ROAD ...................................................................................................... 132 18.3. A10-1-AR2-A ACCESS ROAD ....................................................................................................... 132 18.4. A10-1-AR2-B ACCESS ROAD ....................................................................................................... 133 18.5. A2-4-AR1 ACCESS ROAD ............................................................................................................ 133 18.6. A2-5 ROAD .................................................................................................................................... 133 18.7. A2-5-AR1 ACCESS ROAD ............................................................................................................ 134 18.8. A2-5-AR2 ACCESS ROAD ............................................................................................................ 134 18.9. A2-5-AR3 ACCESS ROAD ............................................................................................................ 134 18.10. A2-5-AR4 ACCESS ROAD ............................................................................................................ 135 18.11. BUDGET ........................................................................................................................................ 135 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES APPENDIX 3: MINUTES OF MEETING IN KGOTLA APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED APPENDIX 5: CONFIRMATION LETTER FROM ROAD DEPARTMENT 6 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AIA Archaeological Impact Assessment ARAP Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan BRDM Botswana Road Design Manual BW World Bank BWP Botswana Pula CLO Community Liaison Officer DEA Department of Environmental Affairs EHS World Bank Group Environmental, Health, and Safety EMP Environmental management Plan IAPS Affected Individuals and Interested Organisations IFC International Finance Corporation NCS National Conservation Strategy OP: Operational Policy OPRC Output and Performance Based Road Contracts PAP Project Affected Persons RAP Resettlement Action Plan RD Road Department RPF Resettlement Policy Framework RPF Resettlement Policy Framework SEP Stakeholder Engagement Plan ToR Terms of Reference VDCs Village Development Committees WB World Bank OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 0. SUMMARY DATA OF RAP Summary Data of RAP Nº. Subject Data 1. Location Sothern District and Kweneng District 2. Road length 123 km and 52.45 km of access road Civil Works Rehabilitation and improvement with gravel, asphalt and double bituminous 3. surface treatment (DBSD). 4. Number of affected plots 34 u Number of project affected 5. persons (PAPs) 128 persons. Number of trees to be 6. affected 411 trees. Area of residential plot 7. affected 1,129.47 m2 Area of developed cropland 8. affected 6,743.41 m2 of undeveloped cropland 9. affected 2,410.76 m2 10. Length of fence affected 4,051.93 m Table 0 . Summary Data 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document summarises information on the status and processes followed for resettlement processes for Botswana Integrated Transport Project in the Output and Performance Based Road Contracts (OPRC) PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANEG ROAD at the stage of Detailed Design. 8 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN The social assessment process includes identifying potentially affected communities and undertaking socio-economic surveys of them, and identifying the economic impacts which could result from land taken or restricted access to the land. The roads Department prepared a Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) developed as a guiding instrument to the implementation of Output Based Long Term Road Contracts (OPRC) in Botswana. The RPF was being prepared in line with the World Bank Safeguard Policy OP 4.12. The Resettlement Action Plan report has been prepared taking into account the guiding principles, scope and contents highlighted by the above mentioned RPF. Project roads A10 and A2 are situated in the northern part of Southern District, the A10 penetrating about 15 km in the Kweneng District. Both roads form an important part of Botswana’s network of main roads, where the former connects Gaborone and the northern parts of the country with the Trans-Kalahari Highway of which the A2 sections 4 and 5 form part. The works include the rehabilitation and improvement of the A10/A2 – Mmankgodi- Kanye - Jwaneng ROAD and about 52.45 km of access roads. Construction works will be carried out during the first 2 – 2.5 years of the contract, with its start after completion of the Detailed Design. Maintenance, both routine and periodic works, will be ongoing during the total 10 years of the contract. Mapping of communities proximate to the project area during the scoping exercise led the consultants to identify 11 villages that, it is believed, will be directly or indirectly affected by the project. For the SIA, consultations, Local Level Key Informant Interviews and Focus Group Discussions were held with Dikgosi and/or members of the VDC’s and residents at these locations. The cut-off date for completion of the census and assets inventory of persons affected by the Project is 31st October 2015. All potentially affected private buildings have been avoided through road alignment. In summary main impacts to local communities will come from the road reserve and cleared strip, no direct impact on buildings has been identified. During Road reserve site survey identify affected area and from this area identify each village ploughing land, affected area, fencing and other affected area. from this land survey classify type of land ,owner of the land, individual conatcact to property owners and calculate number of PAPs. Which detail ref in cost estimation table. Key conclusions are as follows: • No affected persons is displaced • Less than 10% of the productive assets are affected • Resettlement impacts are minimal, but require the design and implementation of an Resettlement Action Plan. Key recommendations are as follows: 9 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN • The Resettlement Action Plan should be designed and implemented, taking care to ensure fair compensation, following the Resettlement Framework developed by the Department of Roads. Plans should be developed for each affected household, and agreed during RAP consultations and first stage implementation before commencement of Project civil works. These plans should be monitored, working closely with affected households. The process of identifying affected persons and properties by roads is based on both; GIS analysis and fieldwork. The methodology to determine those affected has the following phases: • Previous fieldwork. Fieldwork carried out in previous phases by identifying general road impacts (May- June 2014) • GIS Analysis. Intersecting the topography maps (fences, houses, signs, lampposts,…) with the Road reserve and Cleared strip areas. This process identifies preliminary households affected. • Final fieldwork. Final identification of households affected through a detailed field survey of the possibly affected points as identified in the GIS analysis, described above. Affected households were interviewed and completed questionnaires. Once the affected assets were identified, an interview with each household was conducted in order to know, among other data, the number of people living in the household and the condition or socio- economic status . name, Relationship to HH, Sex, Age, Education, Still in School, Current Employment Status, etc.. Once a identified affected plots, consultations have been conducted, both individual and collective. The method used in individual interviews was, after meeting with the Chief in each village, which helped to identify the owners, have a meeting with each of them, asking the questionnaire data of the Table 20. The methodology used in collective consultations, was to convene a meeting in the Kgotla in each village (between October 8 and October 15, 2015), to explain the project and resolve existing issues and doubts of affected and unaffected by the project. Also, at these meetings have formed grievances committees in each village. The end result is that there are 34 affected plots and surveys were carried out on 34 . These surveys are included in appendix 2. No affection is in the main road, but that all are located on the access roads to the villages, near built-up areas. Upon analysing the 34 affected plots, 34 are family dwellings. The data obtained from 34 surveys carried out (see surveys in Appendix 2), are shown in the following table. RELATION Nº Household head 34 Spouse 18 Child 29 Sibling 24 Other relative 57 10 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN TOTAL 128 total number plots affected 34 total number families affected 34 As the only assets (excluding land) that will be affected would be fences or walls and no direct impact on buildings has been identified none of these 128 people will be displaced by the Project. The area and fence length that could be affected and requested compensation for those affected, is shown in the following table: Compensation type SECTION TO CODE Length (m) Area (m2) (money-land-..) 0-01 65.00 174.24 Money 0-04 135.00 479.63 Money 0-05 144.00 197.16 Money 0-06 271.00 378.58 Money 0-07 294.67 1365.50 Money Lothakane West access A10-1-AR2-B road 0-08 296.18 628.36 Money 0-02 342.80 1545.24 Money 0-09 159.34 132.00 Money 0-10 123.08 420.49 Money 0-03 186.54 265.85 Land extension 0-11 358.16 315.63 Money SUBTOTAL A10-1-AR2-B 2,375.77 5,902,68 ´1-01 23.42 81.80 Money A10-1-AR1-C Moshupa access road ´1-02 30.29 87.15 Money SUBTOTAL A10-1-AR1-C 53.71 168,95 Lothakane West access A10-1-AR2-A Money road ´1-03 5.40 8.57 SUBTOTAL A10-1-AR2-A 5.40 8,57 1-04 61.49 69.50 Money 1-05 8.16 7.07 Money A2-5-AR1 Moshana access road 1-06 29.80 87.52 Money 1-07 8.12 7.87 Money 11 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 1-08 46.69 176.83 Money 1-09 52.46 126.50 Money SUBTOTAL A2-5-AR1 206.72 475.29 A2-5-AR2 Selokolela access road 1-10 50.71 119.80 Money 1-11 24.22 27.56 Money 1-12 54.75 40.08 Money SUBTOTAL A2-5-AR2 129.68 187.44 1-13 19.35 29.01 Money A2-5-AR3 Sesung access road 1-20 669.06 2347.85 Money 1-21 55.10 38.26 Money SUBTOTAL A2-5-AR3 743.51 2,415.12 1-14 28.15 46.33 Money 1-15 87.14 88.93 Money 1-16 42.94 78.30 Money 1-17 22.28 17.57 Money A2-5-AR4 Sese access road 1-18 9.97 10.67 Money 1-19 9.00 7.71 Money 1-22 267.87 840.73 Money 1-23 69.79 35.35 Money SUBTOTAL A2-5-AR4 537.14 11125.59 TOTAL ACCESS ROADS 4,051,93 20,283.64 Table 0-1. Affected plots, areas and compensations During the ESIA exercise for the OPRC package 1 an archaeological assessment was done and an Archaeological Impact Assessment has been included within the ESIA report. A total of 51 sites were identified during the survey. Of these 10 are archaeological sites and 5 sites are of social significance. 12 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Estimated Cost: A10-1 ROAD Archaeological mitigation measures Unit cost Cost Description Quantity (BWP) (BWP) Social Significance 2 6,100.00 12,200.00 Early Iron Age Test excavations 1 65,000.00 65,000.00 Systematic Middle Iron Age representative sampling 3 50,000.00 150,000.00 necessary Late Iron Age Test excavations 1 65,000.00 65,000.00 Systematic Late Iron Age representative sampling 2 15,000.00 30,000.00 necessary Total Archaeological mitigation measures 322,200.00 A10-1-AR1-C ACCESS ROAD Compensation cost Compensation cost per unit Cost (BWP) Description Quantity u. (BWP) Moving and replacement of fence 53.71 m 62 3,330.02 Residential plot; yard (Not built) 168.95 m2 12.50 2,111.88 Trees 2.00 u. 110.00 220.00 Disturbance Allowance 100 % 10.00 566.19 Total compensation costs 6,228.09 13 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN A10-1-AR2-A ACCESS ROAD Compensation cost Compensation cost per unit Cost (BWP) Description Quantity u. (BWP) Moving and replacement of fence 5.40 m 62 334.80 Residential plot; yard (Not built) 8.57 m2 12.50 107.30 Trees 1.00 u. 110.00 110.00 Disturbance Allowance 100 % 10.00 45,060.69 Total compensation costs 45,667.62 A10-1-AR2-B ACCESS ROAD Compensation cost Compensation cost per unit Cost (BWP) Description Quantity u. (BWP) Moving and replacement of fence 2,375.77 m 62 147,297.74 Developed Cropland 5,902.68 m2 0.80 4,722.14 Trees 158.00 u. 148.91** 23,528.50 Disturbance Allowance 100 % 10.00 17,527.84 Total compensation costs 193,076.22 ** Average rate Archaeological mitigation measures Unit cost Cost Description Quantity (BWP) (BWP) Systematic representative Middle Iron Age 1 50,000.00 50,000.00 sampling necessary Systematic representative Late Iron Age 1 50,000.00 50,000.00 sampling necessary Total Archaeological mitigation measures 100,000.00 14 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN A2-4-AR1 ACCESS ROAD Archaeological mitigation measures Unit cost Cost Description Quantity (BWP) (BWP) Social Significance 2 6,100.00 12,200.00 Total Archaeological mitigation measures 12,200.00 A2-5 ROAD Archaeological mitigation measures Unit cost Cost Description Quantity (BWP) (BWP) Systematic representative Late Iron Age 1 50,000.00 50,000.00 sampling necessary Total Archaeological mitigation measures 50,000.00 A2-5-AR1 ACCESS ROAD Compensation cost Compensation cost per unit Cost (BWP) Description Quantity u. (BWP) Moving and replacement of fence 206.72 m 62 12,816.64 Residential plot; yard (Not built) 475.29 m2 12.50 5,941.12 Stand pipe 1.00 u. 1,300.00 1,300.00 Trees 9.00 u. 189.44** 1,705.00 Disturbance Allowance 100 % 10.00 8,926.28 Total compensation costs 30,689.04 ** Average rate A2-5-AR2 ACCESS ROAD Compensation cost 15 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Compensation cost per unit Cost (BWP) Description Quantity u. (BWP) Moving and replacement of fence 129.68 m 62 8,040.16 Residential plot; yard (Not built) 159.88 m2 12.50 1,998.50 Undeveloped cropland 27.56 m2 0.30 8.27 Trees 3.00 u. 82.50 247.50 Disturbance Allowance 100 % 10.00 1,029.44 Total compensation costs 11,323.87 A2-5-AR3 ACCESS ROAD Compensation cost Compensation cost per unit Cost (BWP) Description Quantity u. (BWP) Moving and replacement of fence 743.51 m 62 46,097.62 Residential plot; yard (Not built) 67.27 m2 12.50 840,87 Undeveloped cropland 2,347.85 m2 0.30 704.35 Trees 129 u. 64.86** 8,367.15 Disturbance Allowance 100 % 10.00 5,601.00 Total compensation costs 61,610.99 Archaeological mitigation measures Description Quantity Unit cost (BWP) Cost (BWP) Social Significance 1 6,100.00 6,100.00 ** Average rate A2-5-AR4 ACCESS ROAD Compensation cost 16 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Compensation Cost cost per unit (BWP) Description Quantity u. (BWP) Moving and replacement of fence 537.14 m 62 33,302.68 Residential plot; yard (Not built) 249.51 m2 12.50 3,118.87 Developed Cropland 840.73 m2 0.80 672.58 Undeveloped cropland 35.35 m2 0.30 10.60 Stand pipe 2.00 u. 1,300.00 2,600.00 Trees 109.00 u. 119.31** 13,005.06 Disturbance Allowance 100 % 10.00 43,670.98 Total compensation costs 96,380.77 ** Average rate Following table, summarizes the estimated costs Description Cost (BWP) Estimated compensation cost 935,476.60 Total 935,476.60 Approach to the total budget is of 935,476.60 Botswana Pula. The source of funding for this compensation will be the Botswana government, as shown in the letter by the road department, included in Appendix 5. 2. BACKGROUND This document summarises information on the status and processes followed for resettlement processes for the Output and Performance Based Road Contracts (OPRC) PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANEG ROAD at the stage of Detailed Design. The social assessment process includes identifying potentially affected communities and undertaking socio-economic surveys of them, and identifying the economic impacts which could result from land taken or restricted access to the land. The roads Department prepared a Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) developed as a guiding instrument to the implementation of Output Based Long Term Road Contracts (OPRC) in Botswana. The RPF was being prepared in line with the World Bank Safeguard Policy OP 4.12. The Resettlement Plan report has been prepared taking into account the guiding principles, scope and contents highlighted by the above mentioned RPF. 17 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Project roads A10 and A2 are situated in the northern part of Southern District, the A10 penetrating about 15 km in the Kweneng District. Both roads form an important part of Botswana’s network of main roads, where the former connects Gaborone and the northern parts of the country with the Trans-Kalahari Highway of which the A2 sections 4 and 5 form part. The works include the rehabilitation and improvement of the A10/A2 – Mmankgodi- Kanye - Jwaneng ROAD and about 52.45 km of access roads. Construction works will be carried out during the first 2 – 2.5 years of the contract, with its start after completion of the Detailed Design. Maintenance, both routine and periodic works, will be ongoing during the total 10 years of the contract. Mapping of communities in the vicinity of the Project area during the scoping exercise led the consultants to identify 11 villages that, it is believed, will be directly or indirectly affected by the project. For the Social Impact Assessment consultations, Local Level Key Informant Interviews and Focus Group Discussions were held with Dikgosi and/or members of VDC’s and residents at these locations. All potentially affected private buildings have been avoided through road alignment. In summary main impacts to local communities will come from the road reserve and cleared strip, no direct impact on buildings has been identified. As the only assets (excluding land) that will be affected, would be fences or walls, the estimated length of fencing that a directly affected has been valued according to Land Board guidelines (Schedule of Compensation Rates for Tribal Areas, Ministry of Lands and Housing, Dept. of Lands, April, 2010) at BWP62 per running metre (standard 1.2m high diamond mesh). It is assumed that all lost land would be replaced by the Botswana government with land adjacent to the property and outside the road reserve. Replacement land will be available to affected properties (agricultural fields, homesteads) by the Botswana government, as part of the agreement that should be reached during preparation of the Individual Resettlement Plans during RAP implementation. That land lost will be compensated as per Land Board standard procedures. In case of compensation in cash, the source of funding will be the government of Botswana. Narrow strips of croplands will be affected for the Moshupa to Lothakane West road section by establishing a cleared strip along the road as per the BRDM due to road widening, anyhow those areas are minimal and less than 10 % of the crops plot area. Key conclusions are as follows: • No affected persons is displaced • Less than 10% of the productive assets are affected • Fewer than 200 people will be affected 18 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN According to OP 4.12, “In projects where no affected persons are displaced and less than 10% of the productive assets are affected or where fewer than 200 people are displaced, an abbreviated resettlement action plan will be prepared.” Although resettlement impacts are minimal the design and implementation of an Resettlement Action Plan is required. Key recommendations are as follows: The Resettlement Action Plan should be designed and implemented, taking care to ensure fair compensation, following the Resettlement Framework developed by the Department of Roads. Plans should be developed for each affected household with details of compensation, and agreed during RAP consultations and first stage implementation before commencement of Project civil works. These plans should be monitored, working closely with affected households. During the ESIA exercise for the OPRC package 1 an archaeological assessment was done and an Archaeological Impact Assessment has been included within the ESIA report. Implementation of the proposed mitigation measures has been included within the RAP scope; therefore, the Resettlement Action Plan Report includes those mitigation measures for the identified archaeological sites. For detailed information see the ESIA and AIA report. The Government of Botswana, through the Ministry of Transport and Communications, Roads Department, has successfully tendered two Output and Performance Based Road Contracts (OPRC) for the Design, Rehabilitation/ Improvement, Network Performance and Periodic Maintenance/Resealing Works of roads in the south eastern part of Botswana. The contracts (Package 1 and Package 2), which will run for 10 years, are funded by the Government with financing from the World Bank. The works described correspond to Package 1 under the Botswana Integrated Transport Project (Project Number P102368). The roads Department prepared a Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) developed as a guiding instrument to the implementation of Output Based Long Term Road Contracts (OPRC) in Botswana. The RPF was prepared in line with the World Bank Safeguard Policy OP 4.12. The Resettlement Plan report has been prepared taking into account the guiding principles, scope and contents highlighted by the above mentioned RPF. 3. POLICY, LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR LAND ACQUISITION AND COMPENSATION 3.1. RELEVANT LEGISLATION 3.1.1. Tribal Land Act of 1968 The act transferred all the powers previously vested in a chief and a subordinate land authority under customary law in relation to allocation of land to the Land Board. 19 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Under this act, the Land Board was established as an institution for managing all tribal/customary land. The Land Board grants customary land rights to citizens of Botswana. The Land Board also leases land under common law forms of tenure. Part V of the Act addresses specifically procedures for dealing with the application of expropriation for tribal land required for public purposes. Section 32 of the Tribal Land Act provides that land may be granted to the state for public purposes only if the president determines that the purpose for which it is acquired is in the interest of the public. The President poses power of the eminent domain for expropriation of land. The president may acquire any real (immovable) property where the acquisition of such is necessary for public purposes. Section 33 (2) of the Tribal Land Act (1968) provides that compensation is payable when land is acquired for a project and the acquiring body is financially responsible for all aspects of the project; this includes payment for compensation to claimants. The displaced may be granted the right to use other land if available, and is entitled to adequate compensation. 3.1.2. Tribal Land (Amendment) Act (Cap.32:02 of 1993) The act allows for determination of land use zones in tribal areas. According to the act, a Land Board shall after due consultation with the District Council determine and define land use zones within a tribal area. The Land Board shall not make grants of land for any use which is in conflict with the use for which land is zoned. Land Boards may determine management plans for use and development of the zones. 3.1.3. Environmental Assessment Act of (2011) The EA Act provides for Environmental Impact Assessments to be used to assess the potential effects of planned development activities; to determine and to provide mitigation measures for effects of such activities as may have a significant adverse impact on the environment; to put in place a monitoring process and evaluation of the environmental impacts of implemented activities; and to provide for matters incidental to the foregoing. Only after the competent authority, the DEA, has approved the Environmental Impact Statement can the project proceed. The EIA process entails: • The identification of potential environmental impacts; • The identification of measures to mitigate the adverse impacts and enhance the positive effects; • Public consultations to inform and solicit the views and concerns of interested and affected parties about the proposed project; and • The development of an Environmental Management Plan that outlines the proposed measures to mitigate both archaeological and environmental effects. For the undertaking of environmental studies in compliance with the EA Act (2011), the Environmental Assessment Guidelines (2012) have been developed. These guidelines clearly outline the activities to be undertaken during each of the assessment stages, as well as the information and format to be submitted to the DEA for Review. 3.1.4. Monuments and Relics Act 2001 All archaeological sites and to some extent historic sites are protected under the Monuments and Relics Act (2001). This Act requires that Archaeological Impact Assessment (AIA) is undertaken for all 20 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN major development projects and that a Development Permit is obtained from the National Museum before any construction can take place. Section 18 prohibits any alteration, damage or removal from original site of any national monument, relic or recent artefacts. Section 19 of the Act provides for pre-development archaeological impact assessments and mitigation where planned developments are likely to disturb the earth s surface. 3.2. RELEVANT POLICIES 3.2.1. Planning and Environmental Impact Assessment of Road Infrastructure, Guideline No. 5 of September 2001 The guideline is used as a guide in the planning and EIA of linear developments, with particular reference to roads. All road project impacts are included in the assessments, both monetary and non- monetary. All significant impacts are described and discussed in order to optimize the benefits of the roads and minimize the adverse effects. The planning and construction of roads is guided by a 6 year National Development Plan (NDP), outlining projects that are to be undertaken during the period of the plan. The guideline sees consultation as necessary for ensuring that the road network is planned and implemented in an accountable and transparent manner. 3.2.2. Ministry of Lands and Housing Compensation Guidelines The compensation guidelines are in line with the Tribal Land Act of 1968 and deals with both customary land rights and common law grants. The compensation guidelines were prepared by the Department of Lands in 1977 and revised in 2004. There are three (3) main categories of land in Botswana: customary, freehold and state land. Customary land is administered by the Land Boards, and covers over 70% of the total land area. Freehold land is administered by the Department of Lands through the Attorney Generals Chamber s which is responsible for all land transactions. Freehold land entitles the landholder to perpetual and exclusive rights to land and constitutes 5% of the total land area in the country. State land is administered by the Department of Lands and makes up 25% of the land area and comprises National Parks and Wildlife Management Areas (19.4%), Forest Reserves (1%) and all urban land (4.6%). 3.2.3. Land Rights and Entitlements Compensation for tribal land is considered under two categories: • Customary Land Rights • Common Law Land Rights Customary Land Rights Regarding customary land the displaced people are entitled to adequate compensation for the following, where applicable: • The value of any standing crops taken over by the state • The value of any improvements effected to such land, including the value of any clearing or preparation of land for agricultural or other purposes 21 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN • The costs of resettlement, and • The loss of the right of user of such land NB for the last bullet above, refers to where no alternative land is identified or any portion of land taken cannot be replaced. Compensation shall include the value equivalent to loss of right to use that land. Common Law Land Rights When dealing with leases, there may be complications rising due to the following factors; • The lease being registered • The lease being mortgaged • Subletting of one or more portions of lease property • The disruption or closure of business operations NB Where there are complications, such cases are referred to the Department of Lands Acquisition procedures in the case of leased properties are as follows: • The Land Board acquires vacant possession and negotiates the best price. Where the occupier agrees and there is no burden to personal interest, compensation would follow • The Land Board may use its powers under the lease to permit construction of pipelines, power lines, roads, drains etc for public purposes. Compensation is paid only for direct damage to improvements, nuisance and for any land taken for the above servitudes and cannot be replaced • The Land Board may exercise its right to terminate the lease as provided for in the lease agreement in which case adequate compensation is payable. Other Cases. Where fixed costs which are compensated can in fact be salvaged and transported to the alternative site, then removal costs shall be payable based on the actual costs incurred or 10% of the total compensation sum per affected household, taking the higher value. In the case of existing business operations, the following situations are also covered: • Loss of goodwill • Injurious affection and severance where access or other conditions are changed • The loss sustained by reason of moving to an alternative site (disturbance) 3.2.4. Land Acquisition Procedures When government or a statutory body undertakes a project which is of national importance and the only land suitable for that project is already occupied the President shall determine in accordance with Section 32 of the Tribal land Act that it is in the public interest that the land be acquired for the project. 22 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN When such land is taken, compensation is payable as per Section 32 (2) of the Tribal Land Act. The Acquiring body is responsible for aspects of the project including payment of compensation direct to the claimants. National projects include new airports, power stations, dams, schools, roads, village expansions etc. The compensation guidelines requires that the acquiring body informs the relevant land board of its intention at least six months prior to commencement of the project, both of which shall consult the affected parties as appropriate and specified in the guidelines. The required consultation shall involve the District Land Use Planning Unit (DLUPU), District Council, as well as National Conservation Strategy Unit. In accordance with the guidelines, the Land Bard shall in the case of big projects insist that an Environmental Impact Study be commissioned to assess the project s implications. The results of the study are to be used as a factor in deciding the nature of the development and enable the Land Board to state the appropriate conditions under which the application may be approved. The identification of amelioration measures to overcome the suggested impacts should be included in a programme for compensation. In the event of acquisition of already occupied tribal land, Regulation 15 of the Tribal Land Regulations of 1970 is invoked. The acquiring authority with the assistance of the Land Board, make reasonable effort to identify and contact all occupiers within the zoned land. If deemed necessary, the Land Board shall request for a kgotla (community) meeting to advise the people of the scheme and their rights. The views of the affected communities are documented to ensure that they are taken into consideration when a decision to implement the project is made. Using an Environmental Impact Study, DLUPU or the National Steering Committee should give an early recommendation, in principle, to the Land Board, which then forms the basis of subsequent detailed recommendations. Once it has been decided to proceed with the project the compensation assessment committee conducts a physical inspection recording all the details of all improvements to the land and any other fixed assets affected within the zoned area. The inspection report is the basis upon which compensation is assessed. The assessment committee invites the various affected occupiers to submit any additional or counter claims for their improvements if they so wish. Some claimants may engage the services of professionals and should be given time to do so. The compensation assessment committee then meets to discuss and agree on the appropriate rates of compensation. Compensation rates are reviewed yearly and for improvements they are based on depreciated replacement value. Where only part of the land is required and the part remaining cannot be used by itself because of size, access or negative impact of the project, the assessment report gives full details as the acquiring authority may be required to take the whole land and pay compensation for improvements. The Land Board should consider the compensation assessment and submit its recommendations to the Department of Lands for checking and adjustment where necessary. The Department of Lands then advises the acquiring authority of the approved report. The acquiring authority then immediately releases payment directly to claimants. In the case of emergencies, an order is issued by the Minister of Lands and Housing to the effect that people should vacate their land before compensation is paid with commitment by the acquiring authority for full compensation at a subsequent date with interest. In the event of the applicants being dissatisfied with the compensation assessment, they are advised to appeal to the Minister of Lands and Housing who may then appoint an arbitrator in accordance with section 25 (2) of the Tribal Land Act, Cap. 32:02.The claimants have the right to take the appeal to Court if they so wish. NB Section 40 of the Tribal Land (Amendment) Act of 1993 provides for the establishment of the Land Tribunal to assume the responsibility of the Minister in adjudicating on these appeals. 23 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 3.2.5. Eligibility criteria for entitlements All affected parties and assets are eligible for compensation, excerpt the following categories: • Improvement carried out after the cut-off-date • Loss of rights when the use of the land is in conflict with the use for which the land is zoned • Loss of improvements when they are in conflict with the land use zoning, unless the affected person can demonstrate that improvements were carried out with the authority of the land board or prior to the zoning of the land in question. 3.2.6. Methods of valuing, and validating the census of affected assets section The census of the affected assets is based on Forms 2.\32 and 5 of the Compensation Guidelines. Area photography of the project site, with proper referencing completes the census. The schedule 11 of Form 4 of the Guidelines provides an extensive compensation rates that is renewed on a yearly basis. The rates are based on guides for the most common types of affected assets, but the Committee also exerts its best judgment on a case by case basis, factoring in various other factors. The result of the census is then read out to the affected parties, who are given the chance to add their views to the results before signing the Form 2 or Form 3, indicating that they were present at the validation of the census or were represented. After the census validation, the Assessment Committee meets to discuss and agrees on appropriated rates, which are entered on the assessment forms for each affected asset. 3.2.7. Organizational procedures for delivery of entitlement Once the Compensation Report has been approved, the programme is then implemented by the Department of Land. Compensations are paid in cash or in kind whenever feasible. Compensation for loss of all assets, displacement and relocation is payable immediately and directly to the project affected parties by the acquiring body. Per section 8.0 of the compensation guidelines, the vacation of acquired land by the affected parties might happen either: • After the payment of compensation package: this may occur immediately after such payment. • Not after the payment of the compensation package: in this case, the occupiers will sign a written agreement with the acquiring authority specifying the date by which occupiers must vacate the acquired land ( 8.0) • Before the payment of compensation package: in case of emergencies, an order should be issued by the minister to the effect that people should vacate land before compensation is paid. In such instances, a written undertaking must be given by the acquiring body guaranteeing action as per section 6.0 and 7.0 of the compensation guidelines (census and preparation of a compensation report), and the commitment that interest will be paid from the date of taking possession of the land in cash or in kind whenever feasible. 24 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 3.3. INSTITUTIONS 3.3.1. Ministry of Works and Transport The mandate of Ministry of Works and Transport (MWT) is to provide safe, economical and reliable public infrastructure (buildings, roads, aerodromes etc.), government transport and related services, such as road, rail, water and air safety, that will contribute to economic development of Botswana. The MWT has two major portfolio responsibilities namely; (i) Public works sector comprising: • Design, construction and maintenance of government building infrastructure development projects and facilities. • Design, construction and maintenance of national road network including training of road artisans, road technicians, plant operators. • Provision and maintenance of electrical and mechanical facilities for government buildings; • Design, construction and maintenance of aerodromes. • Setting and regulation building control standards. • Sewerage schemes for government institutional buildings (ii) Transport sector comprising; • Provision and maintenance of government transport including road plant and equipment, • Provision and management of air services; • Provision and management of rail services • Management of road transport and safety including road traffic, and • Supervision of statutory authorities such as Air Botswana, Botswana Railways. 3.3.2. Ministry of Lands and Housing The Ministry of Lands and Housing is responsible for the management of land related functions as well as facilitation of housing delivery throughout the country. 3.3.3. Department of Roads The Roads Department within the Ministry of Works and Transport is responsible for developing and maintaining the countries road network, through its development division. The division works collectively with the Ministerial Planning Unit and the Ministry of Finance and with other funding agencies to ensure funding of projects and to fulfil financing conditions. 25 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 3.3.4. Department of Lands The main purpose of the Department is to administer state land through the State Land Act, to regulate freehold land through Land Control Act and provide professional and technical advice on tribal land matters. The department has four technical divisions that carry out its functions. The four divisions are Administration, Estates and Land Valuation, Land Inventory and Management, Land Use and Development. 3.3.5. Department of Environmental Affairs The National Assembly of Botswana approved the National Conservation Strategy (NCS) in December1990. The NCS resulted in the setting up of the NCS Coordinating Agency, the Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) within the Ministry of Environment, Wildlife and Tourism. DEA liaises with other organizations to ensure that the NCS goals and objectives are achieved. To perform its duties, the DEA has three professional divisions, namely Environmental Education, Environmental Research and Monitoring, and Programmes and Projects). An additional division is the Administrative Support Services division. The Programmes and Projects Section is responsible for receiving and reviewing Environmental Impact Statements and preparing the basic background work for the carrying out of the Environmental Impact Assessment. 3.3.6. Department of Town and Regional Planning The Department of Town and Regional Planning (DTRP) was established in 1972. The Department was established as a result of the need to manage the rapid urbanization and growth of rural and urban centres, and the efficient utilization of public and private land. The Settlement Planning Division within DTRP is responsible for the preparation and implementation of development plans for planning areas (urban areas and villages) as well as the preparation of advisory development plans for rural settlements. Settlement plans provide a base or guide for infrastructure provision, growth and direction of the settlement. 3.3.7. The Land Board The Land Board derives its statutory responsibilities to hold land in trust for the citizens of Botswana from the Tribal Land Act of 1968. The functions of the Land Board involves granting of rights to use land, cancellation of the grant of any rights to use any land, imposition of restrictions on the use of tribal land, authorizing any transfer of tribal land and hearing appeals from decisions of Subordinate Land Board in respect of any of its functions conferred on such Sub-Land Boards. The granting and repossession of tribal land are carried out through the land board and in accordance with the provisions of the Tribal Land Act (1968). 3.3.8. Land Tribunal The Tribal Land Act was amended in 1993 to provide for the establishment of a specialized court to attend to appeals against the decisions of the Land Boards and for enforcement of the Land Board decisions. The Land Tribunal s official commencement date was the 13th of October 1997. Section 40 of 26 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN the Tribal Land (Amendment) Act of 1993 provides for the establishment of the Land Tribunal to assume the responsibility of the Minister in adjudicating on appeals. Any party who is aggrieved by the decision of the Land Tribunal may appeal to the High Court on a point of law only. The Land Tribunal is a three member team chaired by a President. The President of the Tribunal is a qualified lawyer appointed in accordance with the provisions of the Public Service Act. The members are also appointed in terms of Public Service Act, on contract terms renewable for two terms. The Tribunal is also empowered to co-opt two advisory members to assist, but not participate in decision making, in any matter before it that involves local cultural or traditional aspects or values. 3.3.9. Compensation Assessment Committee The compensation assessment committee is set up by the Land Board Secretary and consists of the following: • Member of the Land Board (other than the Land Board Chairman) who chairs the committee • Land Board Secretary Secretary • Acquiring Authority • Land Officer (Land Use) Member • District Agricultural Officer Member • Sub Land Board Chairman of the relevant area Member • Clerk of the relevant Sub Land Board • Council Chief Technical Officer Member • Land Board Technical Officer Member • Land Valuer NB A minimum of five (5) members including a Land Valuer must be present at a compensation assessment exercise. 3.4. WORLD BANK INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT POLICY The World Bank observes that involuntary resettlement under development projects, if unmitigated, often give rise to severe economic, social and environmental risks. As such, the World Bank s` resettlement policy is guided by the following objectives: a) Involuntary resettlement should be avoided where feasible, or minimized, exploring all viable alternative project designs b) Where it is not feasible to avoid resettlement, resettlement activities should be conceived and executed as sustainable development programs, providing sufficient investment resources to enable the 27 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN persons displaced by the project to share in project benefits. Displaced persons must be meaningfully consulted and should have opportunities to participate in planning and implementing resettlement programs. c) Displaced persons should be assisted in their efforts to improve their livelihoods and standards of living or at least to restore them, in real terms, to pre- displacement levels or levels prevailing prior to the beginning of project implementation, whichever is higher. 3.4.1. Impacts Covered The policy covers direct economic and social impacts caused by: a) The involuntary taking of land resulting in: • Relocation or loss of shelter • Loss of assets or access to assets • Loss of income sources or means of livelihood b) The involuntary restriction of access to legally designated parks and protected areas resulting in adverse impacts on the livelihoods of the displaced persons. In projects involving involuntary restriction of access to legally designated parks or protected areas, the nature of restriction, as well as the type of measures necessary to mitigate adverse is determined with the participation of the displaced persons during the design and implementation of the project. In such cases, the borrower prepares a participatory process framework acceptable to the Bank. The World Bank also requires that: « Displaced persons and their communities, and any host communities receiving them, are provided timely and relevant information, consulted on resettlement option, and offered opportunities to participate in planning, implementing and monitoring resettlement. The Bank requires that appropriate and accessible grievance mechanisms are established for the displaced/affected. « In new resettlement sites or host communities, infrastructure and public services are provided as necessary to improve, restore, or maintain accessibility and levels of service for the displaced persons and host communities. « To the extent possible, the existing social and cultural institutions of resettlers and any host communities are preserved and resettlers’ preferences with respect to relocating in pre-existing communities and groups are honoured. 3.4.2. Required Measures In accordance with the World Bank Safeguard Policy OP4.12, a resettlement policy framework in line with the World Bank Policy should address the following: a) The RAP should include measures to ensure that the displaced persons are: • Informed about their options and rights pertaining to resettlement • Consulted on, offered choices among, and provided with technically and economically feasible resettlement alternatives 28 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN • Provided prompt and effective compensation at full replacement cost for loss of assets attributable directly to the project. b) If the impacts include physical relocation, the World Bank RPF includes measures to ensure that the displaced persons are: • Provided assistance (such as moving allowances) during relocation • Provided with residential housing, or housing sites, or as required, agricultural sites for which a combination of productive potential, locational advantages, and other factors is at least equivalent to the advantages of the old site c) The RPF should also include measures to ensure that displaced persons are: • Offered support after displacement, for a transition period, based on a reasonable estimate of the time likely to be needed to restore their livelihood and standards of living • Provided with development assistance (such as land preparation, credit facilities, training, or job opportunities) in addition to compensation measures The World Bank Safeguard Policy OP4. 12 prescribes that compensation must be paid before displacement is effected and that preference should be given to land-based resettlement strategies for displaced persons whose livelihoods are land- based. If land is not the preferred option of the displaced persons or sufficient land is not available at reasonable price, non-land-based options built around opportunities for employment or self-employment should be provided in addition to cash compensation for land and other assets lost. The lack of adequate land must be demonstrated and documented to the satisfaction of the World Bank. Payment of cash compensation for lost assets may be appropriate where livelihoods are land-based but the land taken for the project is a small fraction of the affected assets. Cash compensation levels should be sufficient to replace the lost land and other assets at full replacement cost in local markets. The Bank defines replacement cost as follows: a) For agricultural land. it is the pre-project or pre-displacement, whichever is higher, market value of land of equal productive potential or use located in the vicinity of the affected land, plus the cost of any registration and transfer taxes. b) For land in urban areas. it is the pre-displacement market value of land of equal size and use, with similar or improved public infrastructure facilities and services and located in the vicinity of the affected land, plus the cost of any registration and transfer taxes. c) For houses and other structures. it is the market cost of the materials to build a replacement structure with an area and quality similar to or better than those of the affected structure, plus the cost of transporting building materials to the construction site, plus the cost of any labour and contractor’s fees, plus the cost of registration and transfer taxes. In accordance with the Bank requirements, valuation does not take into account depreciation of structures and assets. For losses that cannot easily be valued or compensated for in monetary terms e.g. access to public services, customers, and suppliers or to fishing, grazing or forest areas, attempts are made to establish access to equivalent and culturally acceptable resources and earning opportunities. Where domestic law does not meet the standard of compensation at full replacement cost, compensation under domestic law is supplemented by additional measures necessary to meet the replacement cost standard. 29 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 3.4.3. Special/Vulnerable Groups The Work Bank policy encourages that special attention should be paid to the needs of vulnerable groups (those below poverty datum line, the landless, the elderly, women and children, indigenous people, ethnic minorities etc.) among the displaced. 3.4.4. Criteria for Eligibility According to the World Bank Safeguard Policy OP4.12, displaced persons may be classified in one of the following three groups: a) Those that have formal legal rights to land (including customary and traditional rights recognized under the laws of the country b) Those who do not have formal legal rights to land at the time the census begins but have a claim to such land or assets provided that such claims are recognized under the laws of the country or become recognized through a process identified in the resettlement plan NB Persons classified under a) and b) are provided compensation for the land they lose, and other assistance. c) Those who have no recognizable legal right or claim to the land they are occupying. These persons are provided resettlement assistance in lieu of compensation for the land they occupy, and other assistance as necessary, if they occupy the project area prior to a cut-off date 3.5. GAP ANALYSIS BETWEEN THE NATIONAL COMPENSATION GUIDELINES AND THE WORLD BANK OP4.12 3.5.1. Gaps between the National Compensation Guidelines and the World Bank OP4.12 The main gap in the national compensation guidelines and the World Bank OP4.12 is related to their main objectives. The World Bank OP4.12 first and foremost is a policy document, whose operational principles are also informed by key social development objective, which is to restore, if not improve the livelihood of affected persons, while the national compensation guidelines is mainly an operational guidance to acquire land and compensate asset losses for a public interest investment. 3.5.2. World Bank OP4.12 Policy Objectives OP4.12 holds that displaced people should be assisted in their efforts to improve their livelihoods or at least to restore their lives in real terms, to pre investment levels or to levels prevailing prior to the beginning of project implementation or whichever is higher. Where necessary, to achieve the objective of the policy, the resettlement plan or resettlement policy framework also includes measures to ensure that displaced persons are offered support after displacement, and provided with development assistance in addition to compensation measures (e.g.: land preparation, credit facilities, training, or job opportunities, in-kind compensation, or whatever measures have been identified as a subject of concerns to the displaced people.) In conducting communities' consultation and socioeconomic survey for the resettlement plan, special attention is paid to vulnerable households or persons such as: elderly, disabled, singled-headed, or child- headed households; but also gender discriminating impacts. 30 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Appropriated accompanying measures are taken to assist such households or persons. 3.5.3. Compensation Guidelines Objectives When the government or a statutory body undertakes a project which is of national importance and the only suitable land for that project is already occupied the president shall determine in accordance with section 32 of the Tribal Land Act that it is in the public interest that the land be acquired for the project. When such land is taken, compensation is payable as per section 33(2) of the Tribal Land Act. The acquiring body is responsible for aspects of the project including payment of compensation direct to the claimants. National projects include new airports, power stations, dams, schools, roads, village expansions etc. The Compensation Guidelines provide a set of practical rules and procedures to deal with land acquisition by ensuring fair and just compensation to the affected people. But beyond the provision of such compensation the guidelines do not seek any further objectives for the sake of the persons/households affected. Admittedly, in the course of implementing a project for the public interest, affected people are at best left in the same state as prior to the project, or worse off, depending on their personal vulnerability situation. If deemed necessary affected people might have to be displaced before payment of compensation. 3.5.4. Operational implications of the identified gap This main gap has broad operational implications that further create a gap between the country's Compensation Guidelines and the World Bank OP4.12. The Botswana Compensation guidelines allows for: • Displacement and taking of land under certain conditions and circumstances before affected people are compensated; • Physical displacement with no provision for temporary shelter or paying temporary land; meaning that affected persons might find themselves without shelter if the compensation is not paid ahead of time to enable them to build a new housing; • Displacement of affected people before receiving any compensation if the land taking for civil works is not properly programmed to coincide with the completion of the compensation payments. • The impoverishment of vulnerable groups if they receive cash compensation, but for various reasons due to age, disability, poverty, lack of opportunities they are not able to use it to restore their livelihoods to pre- project level or pre-displacement level. 3.5.5. Measures to fill the Gap Time Table for preparing and implementing compensation Programme or Resettlement Plan The Compensation Programme for the project will be prepared and submitted for review by the competent entities, along with the feasibility study, To avoid physical displacement or land taking before compensation is paid to the affected people, the timetable for displacing the affected people and land taking will show its chronological link with the start of the civil works. 31 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN However, in order not to cause undue delays to the start of civil works, the implementation of some assistance measures like job training should not be linked to civil works planning, as long the approved Compensation Programme or Resettlement Plan shows a clear timeframe, responsibility, and a budget committed to ensure their execution over time. (See table below for other identified gaps and measures to fill them). 32 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Table 1. Comparison of Botswana legislation, policies and compensation guidelines with World Bank policies and measures to fill gaps Botswana Legislation, policies & Subject World Bank Policy Requirement Measures to Fill Gaps guidelines Timing of Compensation paid before Compensation to be paid prior to Compensation Programme or compensation displacement except in the case of displacement and relocation. The Payment emergencies, where an order is displaced persons should be assisted in Resettlement Plan prepared and submitted issued by the Minister of Lands and their efforts to improve their livelihoods for review by the competent entities, along Housing to the effect that people and standards of living or at least to with the feasibility study. Timetable for should vacate their land before restore them, in real terms, to pre- displacing the affected people and land compensation is paid with displacement levels or levels prevailing taking to show chronological link with the commitment by the acquiring prior to the beginning of project start of the civil Works. The beginning of authority for full compensation at a implementation, whichever is higher civil works may not be tied to assistance subsequent date with interest measures, but the approved Compensation Programme should show a clear timeframe, responsibility, and a budget committed to ensure their execution over time. Calculation of Compensation rates are reviewed Compensation at full replacement cost Botswana laws and Bank OP 4.12. are in Compensation. yearly and for improvements on the for loss of assets attributable directly to land there are based on depreciated the project. Depreciation of structures agreement that there be compensation for replacement value. and assets should not be taken into loss of assets. There is however conflict account. between the Laws of Botswana and Bank OP 4.12 with regard to the assessment of the assets. Where there is conflict between Laws of Botswana and the Bank OP 4.12, the latter must take precedence. 33 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Botswana Legislation, policies & Subject World Bank Policy Requirement Measures to Fill Gaps guidelines Form of Land-for-land compensation when Compensation. Preference should be Botswana laws and Bank OP 4.12. are in compensation land is available. If land is not given to land-based resettlement available, cash compensation is strategies for displaced persons whose agreement that there be land paid for all improvements on the livelihoods are land-based. If land is not compensation for land-based livelihoods if land including the value equivalent available at reasonable price, non-land available. In cases where land is not to the loss of right to use the land based options built around opportunities available, Botswana laws supports cash Recommends land-for-land for employment or self-employment payments while Bank OP 4.12 requires should be provided in addition to cash cash payments plus other assistance compensation for land and other assets measures. To bridge this gap, all lost. Compensation Programmes or Resettlement Plans must have a budget for other assistance measures in addition to cash compensation. Squatters**/Land No compensation shall be payable Land users without formal title are The Laws of Botswana will take precedence users without in a case where a dispossessed provided resettlement assistance in lieu in as far as it recognizes rights of tenure. In formal title person is not in a position to adduce of compensation for the land they cases where project affected persons have lawful title to the improvements occupy, and other assistance as no rights of tenure or his/her land use is in which are affected by the proposed necessary, if they occupy the project conflict with the land use of the area he/she project. area prior to a cut-off date occupies according to Botswana laws, the provisions of the Bank OP 4.12 would apply No compensation shall be payable in terms of their rights for compensation, for improvements which are in consultation, grievance mechanism etc, conflict with the land use zoning where they have been affected by the unless the owner-occupier can show project. Where there is conflict between that developments were carried out Laws of Botswana and the Bank OP 4.12, with authority of the land Board or the rule that is most advantageous to the were carried out prior to the zoning PAPs will take precedence. of the land in question. Botswana Legislation, policies & Subject World Bank Policy Requirement Measures to Fill Gaps guidelines 34 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Special/vulnerable No specific provision with respect to The Work Bank policy encourages that All Compensation Programmes or groups additional assistance and special attention should be paid to the Resettlement Plans must have a budget for monitoring needs of vulnerable groups (those other assistance measures in addition to below poverty datum line, the landless, cash compensation. the elderly, women and children, indigenous people, ethnic minorities etc.) among the displaced. Resettlement No specific provision with respect to In case of physical relocation, All Compensation Programmes or Assistance additional assistance and displaced persons are provided monitoring assistance (such as moving Resettlement Plans must have a budget allowances) during relocation. The for other assistance measures in addition displaced should be provided with to cash compensation . development assistance (such as land preparation, credit facilities, training, or job opportunities) in addition to compensation measures. Affected persons are also to be offered support after displacement, for a transitional period **.- In this project there is no squatters 35 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Botswana Legislation, policies & Subject World Bank Policy Requirement Measures to Fill Gaps guidelines Information & In the event of acquisition of already Displaced persons and their Both Botswana laws and Bank OP 4.12 Consultation occupied tribal land, Regulation 15 communities, and any host communities values the consultation of affected people. of the Tribal Land Regulations of receiving them, are provided timely and Bank OP 4.12 requires that the affected be 1970 is invoked. The acquiring relevant information, consulted on involved in designing resettlement options, authority with the assistance of the resettlement option, and offered but Botswana's consultation process falls Land Board, make reasonable effort opportunities to participate in planning, short of that as the affected are just to identify and contact all occupiers implementing and monitoring informed about the impending displacement within the zoned land. The EIA Act resettlement. and are not involved in designing the of 2005 Section 7 - states that an resettlement options. Involving the affected applicant shall take all measures in designing resettlement options does not necessary to seek the views of the contravene the laws of Botswana and can people or communities which are therefore be adopted. The current practice likely to be affected by the activity. in Botswana is to consult the whole The views of the affected community and not targeting the affected communities should be documented directly. Under this RAP, the affected to ensure that they are taken into person must be targeted and consulted as a consideration when a decision to group and as individuals. implement the project is made. 36 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Botswana Legislation, policies & Subject World Bank Policy Requirement Measures to Fill Gaps guidelines Grievances In the event of the applicants being Appropriate and accessible grievance In Botswana there are established dissatisfied with the compensation mechanisms to be established grievance mechanisms in place. The assessment, they must be advised Botswana grievance mechanisms are to appeal to the Minister of Lands accessible as required by Bank OP 4.12. and Housing who may then appoint an arbitrator in accordance with section 25 (2) of the Tribal Land Act, Cap. 32:02.The claimants have the right to take the appeal to Court if they so wish. Section 40 of the Tribal Land (Amendment) Act of 1993 provides for the establishment of the Land Tribunal to assume the responsibility of the Minister in adjudicating on these appeals. Any party who is aggrieved by the decision of the Land Tribunal may appeal to the High Court on a point of law only. 37 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 4. THE RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK, DECEMBER 2008; ROADS DEPARTMENT The roads Department prepared a Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) developed as a guiding instrument to the implementation of Output Based Long Term Road Contracts (OPRC) in Botswana. The RPF was being prepared in line with the World Bank Safeguard Policy OP 4.12. The main objective of the RPF is to allow the World Bank and the Borrower to agree on principles and procedures that will govern the mitigation of adverse social impacts induced by the proposed Integrated Transport Project (ITP). The RPF was prepared in line with the World Bank Safeguard Policy OP 4.12. The Resettlement Plan report has been prepared taken into account the guiding principles, scope and contents highlighted by the above mentioned RPF. 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 5.1. BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT The Government of Botswana, through the Ministry of Transport and Communications - Roads Department, has tendered two Output and Performance Based Road Contracts (OPRC) for the Design, Rehabilitation/Improvement, Network Performance and Periodic Maintenance of roads in the south- eastern part of Botswana. This is a contract style that is new to Botswana, and the proposed project will be one of the first to be implemented in the country. The contracts, which will run for a 10- year period, are funded by the Government with financing from International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), the original institution of the World Bank Group, and the OPEC Fund for International Development (OFID). The works described in this Scoping and Terms of Reference Document correspond to Package 1 under the Botswana Integrated Transport Project (Project Number P102368). Package 1: Road Sections A10-1 Junction A10/B111 – Change 2-3 lanes (40.1 km); A10-2 Change 2-3 lanes – Change 3-2 lanes (2.1 km); A10-3 Change 3-2 lanes – Roundabout A10/A2 Kanye (1.7 km); A2-4 Roundabout A10/A2 Kanye – Kanye West Junction (6.9 km); A2-5 Kanye West Junction (A2/B202 – Jwaneng Roundabout (72.7 km); The works also include the rehabilitation/improvement of 52.45 km of access roads, but not the maintenance works related to the same. Construction works will be carried out during the first 2 – 2.5 years of the contract, with its start after completion of the Detailed Design. Maintenance, both routine and periodic works, will be ongoing during the total 10 years of the contract. The general aim of the IBRD’s OPRC-style contract is to maximise the longevity and integrity of roads projects, specifically in developing countries such as Botswana, where maintenance of newly built or 38 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN refurbished roads is often not carried out adequately. In such situations it has been found that the road works undertaken by contractors could have been improved upon from the beginning of the project, to ensure longer integrity with need for less critical maintenance. In brief, in an effort to address such problems, the OPRC strategy intends to make the Contractor commissioned with construction of the road project responsible for maintenance of the same, for a period of 10 years, self-funding all aspects of maintenance required. It is envisaged that this will be an incentive to construct the project in such a quality manner that a better product, requiring less maintenance, will be achieved with less deterioration over time. 5.2. OBJECTIVES The design works define the rehabilitation and improvement works and as such, shall set the basis for the effective road asset management and maintenance of the OPRC project corridor for the ten year contract duration. The general project objective of widening and rehabilitation of both main roads and connecting access roads is to improve road capacity and achieve reductions in transportation costs, improve road safety. The main roads will be upgraded to Road Type 2A with 7.4m carriageway, 2.4+2.4 m shoulders, new signing and road furniture, increased road safety protection systems and improved drainage. The pavement will be upgraded for the increasing traffic to comply with the calculated load for a 20 years design period. 5.3. TECHNICAL PROJECT SCOPE This Resettlement Action Plan refers to the development of a contract referred to as “Package 1”, which is situated in a corridor that connects the villages of Thamaga, Kanye and Jwaneng. Thamaga is located in the South-east of Kweneng district and the rest villages are located in the North-east of Southern District. Under this proposed Package 1 contract, three main components are included: • Upgrade of existing A10 road from Thamaga to Kanye and and A2 roads from Kanye to Jwaneng; and • Upgrade from gravel to paved road for the section from some access roads; The details of the project scope for this Package 1 project are summarised in the table below, alongside the length of each section. 5.4. PROJECT AREA The project roads A10 and A2 are situated in the northern part of Southern District, the A10 penetrating about 15 km in the Kweneng District. Both roads form an important part of the net of main roads of Botswana, where the first connects Gaborone and the northern parts of the country with the Trans-Kalahari Highway of which the A2 sections 4 and 5 form part. The project road section A10-1 starts at the A10/B111 intersection north of Mmankgodi and leads firstly towards the southwest, passing the outskirts of Thamaga and Moshupa and ends at the foot of the Polokwe Hills. Apart from the intersections with these towns the road also connects with the B-102 road at Moshupa. Several sections are populated and plenty of pedestrians and cattle use the road sides, 39 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN although no buildings have been built in the road reserve. The 40 km road section is crossed by a series of smaller rivers which are crossed in high embankments built over ARMCO culverts of different sizes and numbers. The river Metsemotlhaba is crossed by a 4 span bridge that was built in 1991. The carriageway currently measures approx. 9.0 m (incl. shoulders) at an average. For the following section, A10-2 a climbing lane is added for the southbound traffic over the steep section to the top of the Polokwe Hills allowing for overtaking of slow and heavy vehicles. The 2 km long section starts in a high embankment approaching the hill side and then zig zags climbing with up to 8% steep slope with rock cuts on both sides. The section is currently slightly wider than the adjoining sections, approximately 11 m which will be extended to 14.8 m (incl. shoulders) with the additional lane. Section A10-3 only measures 1.5 km till the Kanye roundabout where it connects with the A2 Kanye by-pass road A2-3 and the A2-4 road. The road is currently 8.4 m wide (incl. shoulders). Section A2-4 leads from the A2/A10 roundabout almost 7 km to Kanye West Junction. This section was recently rehabilitated with an additional asphalt layer and is in good condition. The road is currently approx. 9.0 m wide (incl. shoulders). This section connects to the 8 km long Kanye Access Road. Finally the A2-5 road section leads from Kanye west junction towards the northwest with its end point at the Jwaneng roundabout. Whereas the A10 road section is more densely populated the 72 km long A2- 5 road section from Kanye to Jwaneng is highly rural. The villages along the road are generally distant and the connection is made with Access Roads, of which 4 roads are included in the scope of works. The first 20-30 km are slightly hilly whereas the last half of the road is almost completely flat and predominately covered by Kalahari sands. The road is currently approx. 9.0 m wide (incl. shoulders). In total the 5 main project roads sums 123.254 km and excepting the 2 km climbing lane added to the A10-2 section all roads will be given the same width of 12.20 m, corresponding to a Road Type 2A. The road reserve of 61 m has generally been respected by settlers, even through the more urban areas and no buildings will be affected by its widening. 40 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Figure 1. Project Location, A2, A10 and Access Roads (own elaboration). In addition to the main A10 and A2 roads, the project includes the upgrading of connecting access roads to the villages and larger communities along the main road (some are currently accessed via gravel roads, while others are accessed through via roads). The total length of access roads within this project is about 52 km. Each access road has its start point at the intersection with the main roads and its end point at the village Kgotla where a parking area will be prepared. The upgrading of access roads to paved Road Type 5A will be performed under the initial works although these roads are excluded from further road maintenance under this contract. The Kanye and Moshupa Access Roads run through more densely populated urban areas and have been specified as modified Road Types 3A+B and 4 respectively. However, road geometry has generally been left without changes for these two sections, avoiding restructuring urban areas. 5.5. PROJECT SCALE The new road sections will be designed and constructed to similar road standard as the upgraded A10 and A2 section. Specific changes pertaining to the upgrade of these existing main roads include road widening. Length of From To Scope of work road section Junction of A10 and B111 Junction of A10 and Upgrade from gravel road 50.7 km (at turn-off to Mmankgodi) A2 at Kanye to paved road Junction of A10 and A2 at Upgrade from gravel road Jwaneng Roundabout 72.6 km Kanye to paved road Total length 123.3 Km Table 1. Main road section to be upgraded The proposed works also include the rehabilitation/improvement of between approximately 40-50 km of access roads; however this does not include the maintenance works under the OPRC contract related to the same. The access roads that are relevant to the proposed Package 1 contract are listed in the following table. A technical description of the proposed road construction and standard of upgrade/rehabilitation is given in the following sub-sections of this Chapter. The output of the proposed works will include the Detailed Design of the afore-mentioned road sections. Any bridges and culverts that currently exist in the road sections will be retained unless found to be structurally unsound or otherwise in need of improvement. These will also be widened where required. 41 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Access road to Village Current condition Length of road section Moshupa access road A Paved 7.0 km Moshupa access road B Paved 0.5 km Upgrade from gravel road to paved Moshupa access road C 0.1 km road Lotlhakane West access road A Paved 3.6 km Upgrade from gravel road to paved Lotlhakane West access road B 9.1 km road Kanye access road Paved 8.4 km Upgrade from gravel road to paved Moshana access road 3.1 km road Upgrade from gravel road to paved Selokolela access road 9.6 km road Upgrade from gravel road to paved Sesung access road 7.9 km road Upgrade from gravel road to paved Sese access road 3.3 km road Total length 52.3 km Table 2. Access roads to villages from main roads The Design Consultant carried out a specific study to decide the functionality of the different road and a third alignment presented in a design previous to the OPRC Conceptual Design. A Design Report was presented describing the different factors that had been evaluated and the Designer presented an alternative alignment, generally improving the current river road. Reduced social and environmental impacts, functionality and peoples will were the main criteria to define the best route. A main concern was to leave the villagers’ houses and fields unaffected and at the same time keep the road near the villages to reduce travel distances and avoid the villagers to move with a new road position. The project roads in Package 1 are summarized as follows (measures after improvement): DESIGN ROAD CW SECTION FROM TO SPEED TYPE WIDTH (m) (km/h) A10-1 Junction A10/B111 Change 2-lanes to 3-lanes 2A 12,2 Change 2-lanes to A10-2 Change 3-lanes to 2-lanes 2A 12,2 3-lanes Change 3-lanes to A10-3 Roundabout A10/A2 (Kanye) 2A 12,2 2-lanes Roundabout A10/A2 A2-4 Kanye West Junction (A2/B202) 2A 12,2 (Kanye) 42 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Kanye West A2-5 Jwaneng Roundabout 2A 12,2 Junction (A2/B202) Table 3. Summary of Project roads, Package 1 FROM TO ROAD CW WIDTH SECTION SECTION (TOR) (TOR) TYPE (m) A2-4-AR1 Kanye access road 0+000 8+368 3A+B 10.7 A2-5-AR1 Moshaneng access road 0+000 3+100 5A 7.0 A2-5-AR2 Selokolela access road 0+000 9+600 5A 7.0 A2-5-AR3 Sesung access road 0+000 7+900 5A 7.0 A2-5-AR4 Sese access road 0+000 3+300 5A 7.0 A10-1-AR1-A Moshupa access road A 0+000 6+990 4 9.0 A10-1-AR1-B Moshupa access road B 0+000 0+443 5A 7.0 A10-1-AR1-C Moshupa access road C 0+443 0+492 5A 7.0 A10-1-AR2-A Lotlhakane West access road A 0+000 3+600 5A 7.0 A10-1-AR2-B Lotlhakane West access road B 3+600 12+700 5A 7.0 Table 4. Summary of Access roads, Package 1 With the exception of small local improvements, mainly of the road level, the project roads will respect the center line alignment of the existing roads (A2 and A10). 5.6. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION AND STANDARDS The following sections include a detailed description of the proposed road improvement project as it will be assessed within the ESIA. It is imperative to outline the currently-known scope of the proposed development in this document so as to ensure that the ESIA will address a pre-determined and DEA- acknowledged range of potential effects related to the proposal. The preliminary designs for this project were done in 2010, and based on such preliminary designs, the contract has been issued which includes detailed designs that will be developed in tandem with the ESIA phase of the project. Any elements of the proposal that are added by the developer or otherwise come to light later in the project life must be addressed with separate addendums to the ESIA as the current scope of works outlined herein will be approved by the DEA in writing, prior to commencement of the ESIA phase. The proposed construction project will be required to closely follow guidance from the Botswana Road Design Manual (BRDM). This requires that the standard road type for the main roads included in the project (A10/A2) will adhere to standards for modified Road Type 2A, as per the BRDM. For access roads included in the project, the standard will adhere to Road Type 3A, 3B, 4 and 5A as per the BRDM. 43 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN These standards refer in part to the design speeds relevant to the two different road types. The design speed for the main road type is to be 100 and 120 km/hr as recommended by the BRDM. This same category of design speed reduces to 80 km/hr in the vicinity of built-up area and to 60 km/hr within built- up areas. For the access roads included in the project, the design speed is 80 km/hr reducing to 60 km/hr within built-up areas. The design life of the roads will be 20 years. The standard road reserve width for gazetted roads in Botswana is 61m, 30.5 m on either side of the general run of the road. BRDM recommendations allow for reduction of this width in built-up areas and other areas having existing properties. 5.6.1. Standard cross section The Standard Cross Section of the project has a total width of 12,2 m for the roadway and 13,2 m for the roadway and berms, made up of the following elements:  Carriageway: 7,40 m divided into two 3.70 m wide lanes.  Shoulders: 2,40 m.  Berm: 0,5 m Figure 2. Typical cross section in straight alignments This basic section is completed by a series of auxiliary elements shown in the Drawings. 5.6.2. Bus Bays and Rest Areas Currently, there are some roadside facilities along the alignment, such as bus bays and rest areas, which have to be preserved. Bus bays are provided at points where passengers are regularly picked up. They are located on both sides of the carriageway, staggered right-left. 5.6.3. Fencing The proposed fencing design for the roadworks is shown in the figure below, as designed by the Contractor’s design engineers. 44 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Figure 3. Engineers proposed fencing design 5.7. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONAL PHASE The activities expected during the maintenance phase, include: • Periodic maintenance resealing works: Consisting of a set of specific pavement surfacing improvements indicated in the Project Specifications. • Network performance (routine maintenance) works, or “services”: Consisting of all interventions on the roads which are to be carried out by the contractor in order to achieve and maintain the road performance standards defined by the Service Levels included in these Specifications, and all activities related to the management auditing of the road contract performance measures In both cases, these activities will be carried out only on the main roads sections of A10 and A2 identified in this document. Maintenance Activities on Access roads are not part of this project. 5.8. PROJECT SCHEDULE AND PHASING DETAILS Currently, the project is considered to be within the “Design Phase”. This is a period where detailed designs are being finalised, preliminary engineering studies and initial field investigations are being undertaken, and environmental studies as part of the project ESIA are completed. It is expected that construction will begin immediately upon approval of the ESIA, in the final quarter of 2014. The Contractor is likely to require 18 months to complete construction of the project, which will be followed by a maintenance period of 8 years on the main road upgrade (this maintenance does not include the access roads). The contractor is responsible for the road maintenance for a 10 year period 45 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN from the signing of the OPRC contract, which included maintenance of the existing roads prior to any upgrade/construction works. Phase Period Contraction starts May 1st 2014 Rehabilitation 2014-2017 Reseal 2022 Maintenance 2014-2024 Table 5. Project Phasing summary 5.9. SOCIAL ASPECTS 5.9.1. Improving living conditions The Employer has defined that the main objective of this road section is the social aspect, although aware of the road upgrading not being economically justified. The investment is made with the purpose to improve the living conditions for the people in the road corridor. People’s will: In May – June 2014 public meetings were held in all the villages along the A10 and A2 track followed by field studies with a detailed follow up through direct interviews and focus group discussions. Concerns were expressed both regarding speeding and safety of children and cattle. The people’s will would be to have a reliable all weather / all year road for their use, rather than a fastest possible connection from one end point to the other. 5.9.2. Employment The employment policy for the project is informed by the project ESMP. Usually, it is recommended that preference be given to the residents of the affected or nearby villages, especially for jobs that do not require high levels of skill. Skilled labour will be sourced nationally, expatriates may be engaged if these jobs cannot be satisfactorily filled locally. The exact number of people that will be employed for the various phases of the project are unknown at this stage. It is however expected that at peak 50-75 people will be employed during construction. 5.9.3. Widening of road reserve – existing roads Widening the road reserve is an alternative to leaving the current width of the road reserve as is. The potential widening of the road reserve could require resettlement of affected properties, and therefore the selected alternative was to only widen the reserve as and when necessary, to avoid and minimize the impact on fields and properties to be affected. This will result in a situation whereby the road will be slightly off-centre in some places; however the impact of this is negligible on traffic. 46 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 5.10. SCOPE OF OPRC SERVICES Output and Performance Based Road Contracts are currently becoming more and more usual for Road Asset Management internationally. The contracting form, which is new in Botswana, is designed to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of road asset management and road maintenance, laying a greater responsibility on the Contractor who is controlled through a series of Performance Measures or Indicators to measure the service level achieved and maintained throughout the contract. The Main Objectives of this OPRC as specified in the contract’s ToR is to: a) Increase the efficiency and effectiveness with which the management and maintenance of the road network is carried out b) Maximize the value for money being spent on the development and maintenance of the road network c) Improve the condition and safety of the road network for the benefit of its users d) Proactively maintain the condition of the road network within the right of way using planned strategies and best practices available. The current OPRC contract will run for 10 years with its starting date on 1 May 2014. The works included in the OPRC scope are Design, Rehabilitation/Improvement, Network Performing Works (Routine Maintenance) and Periodic Maintenance/Resealing Works. The Detailed Design of all Rehabilitation and Improvement works is described in the Detailed Design Report. The Rehabilitation works shall extend the service life of the existing road, mainly through pavement rehabilitation, resealing and associated drainage maintenance works to guarantee the structural and functional conditions of the roadway, including shoulders. The Improvement works include the repair and/or improvement of the existing road or upgrading, including improving road alignment, road widening, drainage repair or replacement, surface upgrading to sealed/paved surface and other safety improvements. The Network performance (Routine Maintenance) works include pavement surfacing after finishing the Rehabilitation/Improvement works, shoulder and drainage maintenance, routine bridge and minor structure maintenance, sign and pavement marking maintenance, vegetation control etc. Access roads are excluded from this service. The Periodic Maintenance/Resealing works consist of a set of specific periodic improvements, generally of the pavement surfacing. The Emergency works consist of activities needed to reinstate the roads if damaged as a result of natural phenomena. 47 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 5.11. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT The Environmental impact assessment related to the project has consisted of the initial Environmental Project Brief, the Scoping report (May 2014), the Revised Scoping Report (August 2014) and the EIA report (September 2014). An EMP has been developed for the project. 5.12. CLEARED STRIP AND ROAD RESERVE Section 3-106 “Stage Construction” of the Botswana Road Design Manual (BRDM) point out that: “The standard road reserve for gazetted roads in Botswana is 61 m and this is adequate for any type of road which is likely to be constructed in the future” That 61 m road reserve can be easily established when the road runs along rural/bush land or not developed land. As highlight the BRDM: “It frequently occurs, however, that there is existing development within the road reserve and it might be socially, politically or economically indefensible to clear the entire reserve for anticipated road development at some future date. In order to ensure operational safety, adequate Sight distance and sufficient lateral clearance for the road drainage and the accommodation of services a minimum width of cleared strip, within which demolition of buildings must occur, shall be provided as given in Table 3- 106.2. Road Type 1 2 3 4 5 6 Min. cleared strip m 45 30 30 30 25 15 Table 6. Minimum width of cleared strip. TABLE 3-106.2of (BRDM) “Buildings or other obstructions outside this cleared strip may be permitted to remain in use on a temporary basis. These temporarily reprieved buildings would be fenced around and no further development should be permitted (see Figure 3-106.2). Development controls over the entire 61 m road reserve should be imposed in order to prohibit any new development. When passing urban areas or building areas the road reserve can´t be physically placed, and a then a cleared strip for the road has to be established. Anyhow, in a case by case study when the road passes throughout building areas (towns and villages), the cleared strip can be minimal. The BRDM also explain that: 48 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN “The minimum widths of cleared strip make provision for only moderate cuts and fills. Where the extent of earthworks would fall outside the Minimum widths clearing should be at least 1 m outside the earthworks limits.” Figure 3-106.2 of the BRDM shows the sketch of the Minimum Cleared width within road reserve (see next figure). Figure 4. Minimum Cleared width within road reserve (Figure 3-106.2 of the BRDM) 49 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Based on the above guideline a detailed guideline to be use for package 1 is presented hereinafter: Built up areas Not built up areas Proposal to avoid impacts NEW ROAD CLEARED NEW ROAD ROAD CLEARED ROAD Reduced road Reduced PACKAGE 1 WIDTH (INCL. STRIPS (Case WIDTH (INCL. RESERVE STRIPS RESERVE width cleared strip SHOULDERS) by case study) SHOULDERS) 61m road 30 m cleared 30 m cleared A2 and A10 roads reserve 12.2 m strip where 12.2 m strip (fenced) possible A2-5-AR2 Selokelela, 61m road 25 m cleared 25 m cleared 1 meter A2-5-AR3 Sesung & reserve 7.0 m strip where 7.0 m strip cleared strip A10-1-AR2 Lotlhakane (fenced) No road possible Reduce each side of reserve 30 m cleared shoulders to 1 m A2-4-AR1 Kanye & A10- the reduced ------------- ------------- ------------- strip where 10.7 m / 9 m 1-AR1 Moshupa road width possible 25 m cleared Other access roads No road 25 m cleared 7.0 m strip where 7.0 m Package 1 reserve strip possible Table 7. Road reserve and cleared strip for not built up areas and built up areas for package 1 50 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN The section running from Moshupa to Lothakane West (A10-1-AR2-B road) passes through cropland. The edges of the fields are very close to the road. In some cases, less than 5 meters apart. The situation is very different from the other sections, where the road mainly crosses bushy areas. To avoid the impact on existing crops along this first section from Moshupa to Lothakane West, the fence will be placed along the edge of the cleared strip, just as stated in the BRDM. The cleared strip shall be 30 meters wide, 15 meters wide on either side of the axis, in accordance with the requirements for this road type The following figures represent pre and post-project conditions and the application of the criteria from the above table for sections A-10 and A-2, A10-1-AR2-B and for built-up areas. Figure 5. Impacts to individual properties by establishing the road reserve and cleared strip on not build up area. A-101 and A-2 roads 51 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Figure 6. Impacts to individual properties by establishing the road reserve and cleared strip on not build up area. A10-1-AR2-B Access road. 52 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Figure 7. Impacts to individual properties by establishing the cleared strip on build up area. 53 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLANT 6. SOCIO-ECONOMIC STUDY In this section, the baseline environment of the broader affected area is described. 6.1. OVERALL SOCIAL STATUS: NATIONAL AND SOUTHERN DISTRICT COMPARISONS The 2005 Botswana Human Development Report (UNDP, 2006), the Quandl website on Botswana indicators 1, Health Statistics 2009 (Statistics Botswana, 2012c) and Statistics Botswana (2012k) provided an overview of the development situation in Botswana by location. Findings are summarized in the following table, providing national findings, findings for urban and rural areas, and findings for Southern District, as available: Indicator National Urban Rural Southern Total population 2011* 2038228 1268797^^ 769431^^ 184066 Total population 2013^^^ 2127825 na na na Annual Population Growth Rate (%)* 1.35 na na na Female population 2011* 1035608 na na 95112 Female population (%) 2011* 49.77 na na 51.67 Population 0-14 yrs 2012 (%)^^ 33.75 na na na Rural population (%)^^ 37.75 na na na Urban population (%)^^ 62.25 na na na HIV rate (%) in adults (15-49 years) 2013 (for Southern, 24.3 na na 28.2 25-49) ** HIV prevalence rate 2013 (%)** 18.5 19.2 17.4 11.8 HIV prevalence rate - Females (%) 2013** 20.8 na na 12.8 HIV prevalence rate - Males (%) 2013** 15.6 na na 10.6 Life expectancy at birth 2011 (years)^^ 46.67 na na na Life expectancy at birth – Female 2011 (years)^^ 46.27 na na na Life expectancy at birth – Male 2011 (years)^^ 47.27 na na na Percent undernourished 2012 (%)^^ 25.7 na na na Adult literacy both sexes % aged 15 and above (2011)^^ 85.09 na na na Youth (15-24) literacy rate (2011)^^ 95.21 na na na GDP per capita (purchasing power parity) 2013 (US$)^^ 16 377 na na na Human development index measure (2012)^^ 0.63 na na na % population with access to primary health care between 8 5 na na na and 15kms from residence (2007)^ % population with access to primary health care between 5 11 na na na and 8kms from residence (2007)^ % population with access to primary health care within 5 84 na na na km from residence (2007)^ Population with sustainable access to an improved water 97 na na na 1 http://www.quandl.com/society/botswana-all-society-indicators 54 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Indicator National Urban Rural Southern source (2013) (%)^^^ Access to improved sanitation facilities (2013)(%)^^^ 64 na na na Percentage of births unattended (% 2013) 1 na na na Number of registered destitutes (2014)***** 45000 na na na Human Development Index (2012) 0.634 na na na Physicians per 10,000 population (2013)^^^ 3.4 na na na Nurses per 10,000 population (2013)^^^ 28.4 na na na Hospital Beds per 10,000 population (2013)^^^ 18 na na na Prevalence of under-five malnutrition 2013 (%)^^^^ 11.2 na na na Anaemia in children (1996) 38 35 58 na Full immunisation (by age 2 years) (2011) 94 na na na Infant mortality rate (2011) (per 1000 live births)^^^^ 20 na na na Under-five mortality rate (2012) (per 1000 live births)^^^^ 53 na na na Percent of under-fives with diarrhoea in the two weeks 10 na na na prior to the survey (2007) Percent of under-fives with acute respiratory infections in 38.5 na na na the two weeks prior to the survey (2000) Net Primary Enrolment Rate (1997)^^^^^ 98.4 na na na Net Primary Enrolment Rate (2003)^^^^^ 98.7 na na na Net Primary Enrolment Rate (2008)^^^^^ 92.7 na na na Pupil Teacher Ratio (2008)^^^^^ 25.1 na na na Transition Rate from Standard 7 to Form 1 (from primary 94.8 na na na school to secondary school) (1997) Transition Rate from Standard 7 to Form 1 (from primary 98.5 na na na school to secondary school) (2008)^^^^^ Percentage of Secondary Teachers Untrained (1999)^^^^^ 18 na na na Percentage of Secondary Teachers Untrained (2008)^^^^^ 1.12 na na na Proportion of Primary School Student Population Female 50.1 na na na (1995) Proportion of Primary School Student Population Female 49.3 na na na (2004) Proportion of Primary School Student Population Female 48.9 na na na (2008) Proportion of Secondary School Student Population 53.3 na na na Female (1995) Proportion of Secondary School Student Population 51.9 na na na Female (2004) Proportion of Secondary School Student Population 52.1 na na na Female (2008)^^^^^ Percent of 3-5 year olds in pre-school 8.7 13.5 2.4 na Percent of households with access to electricity (2011) 45.7 na na na Access to a radio (2001) 67.6 75.8 64.3 na Access to a radio (2004)^^ 69.7 na na na na = data not available. *2011 Population & Housing Census. **BAIS IV (2013) *** Southern DDP7. ****March 2005. Botswana Federation of Trade Unions (2007a). *****http://www.thevoicebw.com/2014/04/25/govt-splash-p293-m-on-poverty-eradication- programmes/ ^Health Statistics (2009). ^^World Bank http://www.quandl.com/society/botswana-all-society-indicators. 55 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN ^^^http://kff.org/globaldata/?search-field=Botswana. ^^^^UNDP (2006). Statistics Botswana (2012k). ^^^^^MOE Education Statistics Report 2008. WHO Health Statistics 2013. Botswana Family Health Survey (2007). Table 8. National and Southern District Level Human Development Indicators 6.2. DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT: SOUTHERN DISTRICT 6.2.1. Geography and Settlement Southern District is located in southern Botswana, between latitudes 24 and 26 degrees south. The Plan Area is bordered to the north by Kweneng District, to the east by South East District, to the south by the Republic of South Africa (RSA), and to the west Kgalagadi District. With a landmass of 26,776 km2 it is the sixth largest district in Botswana. Figure 8. Botswana Districts showing Southern District. Currently, there are three sub-district headquarters, comprising Mabutsane, Moshopa and Good Hope. The Moshupa sub-district has since been established and is now functional and Kanye was made the administrative headquarters of the district during DDP6. 6.2.2. Economic Activity Southern District is the location of the large-scale Debswana diamond mine at Jwaneng, a major source of income for Botswana. Aside from the mine at Jwaneng, there are other smaller mining and quarrying activities in the district, with the operation at Moshana the largest in this regard, and plans for a manganese mine. 56 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN While mining is important for the overall economy of Botswana, for many residents of Southern District a mix of agriculture, trade, and formal employment are central to household livelihoods. Arable agriculture is more viable in the eastern part of the District, with better soils and higher and more reliable rainfall. Arable agriculture covers some 10% of the total land area, while rangeland comprises more than half of the total land area, and especially high in the west (Ministry of Local Government, 2009). Kanye is the largest centre for economic activity in the District, while economic activity elsewhere along the key road networks (Trans-Kgalagadi Highway and the roads leading north to Gaborone). Tourism is limited in the District, with limited accommodation mostly along the Trans-Kgalagadi Highway for short-term stays on to other locations. There is one wildlife management area as well as four private ranges and eight ostrich ranches. Wildlife is concentrated in the less populated western portion of the District. Tourism opportunities include the S02 Wildlife Management Area in the west, and localised, small scale historical opportunities elsewhere in the District. District level data on energy is not available, save references in the District Development Plan to environmental challenges arising from overuse of biomass, and consequent land degradation particularly in the east. No major national energy sources exist in Southern District. The 10th National Development Plan (MFDP, 2009) overviews the energy sector, and makes reference to rural electrification. The Southern District Development Plan (Ministry of Local Government, 2009) argues that rural electrification is central to economic activity in the region, especially for business development. Access to electricity in rural areas increased from just over 25% in 2004 to almost 50% in 2009 (MFDP, 2009). Key roads infrastructure is noted in the map on the following page. The A1 road runs through the eastern portion of the District, linking the border at Ramatlabama to the northern boundary of the district heading for Lobatse and South East District. Traffic volume was estimated at 1,000 vehicles a day in 2008 (Ministry of Local Government, 2009). The A2 traverses the District, running from east to west through the middle of the District. The A2 provides a major link between southern Botswana and northern South Africa with Namibia and the port of Walvis Bay. Traffic volumes along the A2 are very high between Lobatse and Kanye, at around 4,000 vehicles per day, dropping as the road proceeds west (Ministry of Local Government, 2009). Traffic volumes are said by key informants to have increased significantly since these 2008 data, with annual traffic growth averaging some 15% per annum. 57 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Figure 9. Map of Southern District Showing Major Roads. Ministry of Local Government, 2009. 6.2.3. Population Characteristics Population data for Southern District are indicated in the following table: Locations Total 2001 Total 2011 Male 2001 Male 2011 Female 2001 Female 2011 Jwaneng 15,179 18,016 7,613 9,838 7,566 8,178 Ngwaketse 113,704 129,247 53,810 62,278 59,894 66,969 Ngwaketse West 10,471 13,689 5,159 6,873 5,312 6,816 Barolong 47,477 54,819 23,397 26,676 24,080 28,143 Southern District 186,831 215,771 89,979 105,665 96,852 110,106 Table 9. 2001 and 2011 Population Data. Source: 2001 (Central Statistics Office) and 2011 (Statistics Botswana) Population Housing Censuses. 58 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Population in Southern District is concentrated in the eastern half, due to higher and more reliable levels of rainfall and better soils. Southern District has a semi-arid climate with summer rainfall between November and March. The populations of villages and towns in the Project Area are included in the following table: Village Total 2001 Total 2011 Male 2001 Male 2011 Female 2001 Female 2011 Ramaphatle 299 719 161 373 138 346 Thamaga (Kweneng 18,117 21,471 7,884 9,762 10,233 11,709 District) Lotlhakane West 1,192 1,637 547 744 645 893 Village Moshupa 16,922 20,016 7,468 9,095 9,454 10,921 Village Kanye 40,628 47,013 18,020 21,606 22,608 25,407 Village Moshana 1,336 1,512 601 712 735 800 Village Selokolela 1,188 1,610 528 740 660 870 Village Sesung 385 752 165 351 220 401 Seherehela 534 723 255 332 279 391 Pitseng 850 1,074 383 486 467 588 Betesankwe 299 389 161 202 138 187 Village Sese 1,465 2,721 692 1 333 773 1,388 Jwaneng 15,179 18,016 7,613 9,838 7,566 8,178 Table 10. Village Populations in Project Area. Source: 2001 (Central Statistics Office) and 2011 (Statistics Botswana) Population Housing Censuses. 6.2.4. Age and Sex Structure According to the 2001 Population and Housing Census, the male population was 89,984 while the female population was 96,847 accounting for 48.2% and 51.8% of the total population, respectively. 6.2.5. Settlement Patterns National Settlement Policy stipulates that all towns and villages with a population of 500 or more shall have development plans to guide their development. The District has 66 centres (excluding Jwaneng) with 500 or more people. This comprises Kanye as the single primary centre, 3 secondary centres (Moshupa, Goodhope and Mabutsane) and 62 tertiary centres. Some of those locations classified as villages under the National Settlement Policy are reached by the Project, with roads built to the kgotla in each village. 6.2.5.1. District Settlement Strategy It was envisaged that during this plan period, the District Settlement Strategy would be prepared so that conflicts in allocation, distribution of resources/services to settlements could be resolved. Also according to National Settlement Policy, the District Settlement Strategies were supposed to be prepared 59 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN to facilitate the preparation of DDPs. However, the plan has not been realized, hence the District is still facing the problem of resource/service distribution. 6.2.5.2. Physical Development Plans and Village Layout Plans Of five planned Village Development Plans, one was prepared, covering Good Hope. In the Project area, the planned Village Development Plan for Lotlhakane East was not prepared. Seven village layout plans (Mabule, Ranaka, Moshaneng, Kanye, Phitsane-Molopo, Ntlhantlhe and Mogonye) were to be prepared, but await financing. Ten village layout plans were prepared, including Kanye in the Project area. The three Sub-District Headquarters of Moshupa (in the Project area), Mabutsane and Good Hope (in the Project area) were to be declared planning areas in order to control development. However, this was not possible, according to plan documents, due to a lack of funds. Southern District covers an area of 26,776 km2. Land use patterns for the District are indicated in the following table: Land Use Area (Km2) % Settlement (Built up Areas) 212.5 0.8 Major Infrastructure Corridors 45.7 0.2 Agriculture 26,779.6 10.0 Farms/Ranches 6,239.2 23.3 Wildlife Management Areas (WMA) 2,494.4 9.3 Rangeland 15,094.6 56.4 Total 50,866.0 100 Table 11. Land Use in Southern District. Source: DDP 7 Half of Southern District comprises rangelands. This rangeland is characterised by grassland and open shrub land, covering some half of the communal rangeland area. Some areas are characterised by severe overgrazing, but this represents less than 10% of all rangeland. Arable fields comprise 10% of the District, with fields larger and more common as you move from west to east. Additional arable land remains available for future population growth. Of the 17,000km2 of land classified as suitable for arable farming, 15.6% is under cultivation, with density highest in the east where rainfall is higher and more reliable and where soils are better. Livestock farming is undertaken through pastoral farming in the communal rangeland and on private ranches. Livestock farming involves the rearing of cattle, horses, donkeys, sheep, goats and other small stock. Of all livestock, 60.2% are cattle, followed by goats and sheep (26.4%), and donkeys (11.8%). Wildlife in Southern District is found in range land areas in the western part of the District and the (S02) Wildlife Management Area, in the west of the District, and private game ranches. Springbok constituted the most plentiful wildlife species (41.9%) which numbered 5,497 in 2003. Hartebeest was the second most populous species numbering 2,540 or 19.3% followed by Kudu (1,599) or 12.2% and steenbok with a population of 1,430 or 10.9% of the District’s wildlife population. 60 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Southern District has four private ranches north of the Project area: Doornlaagte, Kojane, Bonyamabono and Vikings. There are a total of eight ostrich farms: Maradu, Itlholatau, BDF, Pitsane, Neejoy Nee, Ostrich Development Company, Ultimate Ostrich Farm, Sunben and Carlfe De Bruyn. The (SO2) Wildlife Management Area in the west of the District covers 2,510 km2. It was established in order to provide a migratory corridor for wildlife as a link between Central Kalahari Game Reserve and the Kgalagadi Transfrontier National Park. The Mekgatshi Community Trust has been created so that local communities benefit from the Wildlife Management Area, including the villages of Mabutsane, Sekoma, Mahotshwane, Khonkhwa, Keng, Itholoke, Khakhea, Kanaku, Kutuku, Kokong and Morwamosu. 6.2.6. Tourism Tourism is very limited in the District. There is national tourism, including expatriate populations in Gaborone, covering the following: i) Bathoen Dam Bird Sanctuary ii) Manyana Rock Paintings iii) Livingstone’s Tree iv) The Gorge at Kanye v) Mosenekatse Hill vi) Early Ngwaketse Village vii) Dimawe viii) Sobe Ruins
 ix) Kanye Hill Stone Walls x) Makaba’s Tree xi) Pharing Gorge xii) Kgwakgwe Hills xiii) Ranaka Old Stone Settlement xiv) Mmasechele Gorge 6.2.6.1. Institutional Framework At district level, the Ministry of Education is represented by the following departments: Primary Education, Secondary Education, Non-Formal Education, Teacher Training and Development, Teaching Service Management, Special Education, and the HIV&AIDS Coordinating Office. The responsibility for Primary Education is shared between two ministries, the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Local Government. The latter is responsible for provision of infrastructure, stationary and equipment, provision of ancillary staff, and transportation of teachers and pupils during educational tours and sporting activities. On the other hand, the department of Primary Education under the Ministry of Education is responsible for the provision of curriculum materials to schools, management of schools, teachers’ welfare and recruitment. The Department of Secondary Education is responsible for quality assurance in secondary schools as well as supervision and inspection of schools. The Department of Non Formal Education is responsible for providing out of school education to the youth and adults who missed their chance to enrol with the conventional school system during their tender age. The Department of Teacher Training and Development is responsible for in-service training for teachers at primary and secondary schools as well as private schools. 61 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN The Department of Teaching Service Management’s mandate is to attend to teachers’ welfare. The Special Education Unit in the region ensures that children with special needs access education and have equal opportunities while the HIV and AIDS Coordinating office oversees and supervises the implementation of HIV programmes in schools. Southern District has one Education Centre, located in Kanye, whose mandate is to develop and implement in-service training programmes to contribute to the overall improvement of the quality of both primary and secondary education. 6.2.6.2. Pre-school Education Pre-school facilities offer classes to pre-school aged children with the aim of preparing them for primary schools. The pre-schools are either owned by individuals or run by communities through the Village Development Committee (VDC) as is the case in most pre-schools in the rural areas of the District. Personnel are trained at Lobatse Day Care Centre. Southern District has total of fifty-eight (58) day care centres and the ownership is as follows: • Council – 1 • Private – 21 • Village Development Committees – 8 • Community Based Organisations – 17 (churches) • Non-Governmental Organisations - 11 6.2.6.3. Primary Education The mandate of the Department of Primary Education is to ensure that all school going age children (5 – 12) have access to basic education. Southern District has a total of 106 primary schools with a total enrolment of 38,718 pupils. The department is currently faced with a backlog of provision of educational facilities. In 2009 Moshupa Sub-District had 429 classrooms to accommodate 13,341 pupils or 31 pupils per classroom and Kanye in Southern District had 273 classrooms to accommodate 8,027 pupils or 29 pupils per classroom. 6.2.6.4. Secondary Education The Department of Secondary Education is responsible for quality assurance in all the secondary schools in the district. The District has twenty-four Community Junior Secondary Schools and three Senior Secondary Schools. They enrolled a total of 17,558 pupils in 2009. In 2008, South District reported a shortage of 142 classrooms (MOE 2008). Other data for secondary education, available for 2008, are as follows (Ministry of Education and Skills Development, 2008): • Ngwaketse Total number of Government & Private secondary schools: 27 • Southern District Students enrolled: 17,884 • Ngwaketse Students enrolled: 15,348 • Ngwaketse Classrooms: 296 • Ngwaketse Pupil classroom ratio: 14 62 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN • National Transition Rate from primary to junior secondary: 98.5 • Ngwaketse Pupil teacher ratio 2006: 25.3 • Ngwaketse Pupil teacher ratio 2007: 25.1 • Ngwaketse Pupil teacher ratio 2008: 24.5 • Ngwaketse Teachers: 1,159 • Barolong Total number of Government & Private secondary schools: 4 • Barolong Students enrolled: 2,536 • Barolong Classrooms: 78 • Barolong Pupil classroom ratio: 13 • Barolong Pupil teacher ratio 2006: 20.2 • Barolong Pupil teacher ratio 2007: 20.0 • Barolong Pupil teacher ratio 2008: 20.9 • Barolong Teachers: 205 6.2.7. Revised National Policy on Destitute Persons, 2002 The policy provides welfare conditions and economic circumstances to qualify for entitlement to social benefits/safety nets and services to beneficiaries. The policy directs provision of the following services which are aimed at alleviating the distressful impact of absolute poverty targeting the most underprivileged members of the community: Food basket, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and uniforms for the needy students, funeral expenses and other social safety services deemed necessary. The Southern District Council has been fully implementing the policy in accordance with the guidelines and intends to maintain and accelerate the quality services during DDP7. Southern District has a caseload of 7,416 (2007/08) destitute persons and currently there are no graduates from the programme. 6.2.8. Early Childhood Care and Education Policy, 2001 The policy provides guidance and supervision in the implementation of Day Care Centre Program (Acceptable hygienic conditions, acceptable physical structures, acceptable quality of the environment, and acceptable quality of food, adequate education and development material). Day Care Centres are licensed after meeting the policy requirements and standards. In this regard, Southern District Council has been fully implementing the policy in accordance with the guidelines. 6.2.9. Short Term Plan of Action for Orphans (STPA): 1999-2003 The STPA is aimed at protecting the welfare of orphans, providing basic social services, protecting their inheritance, property, providing them with medical, school and welfare support and ensuring proper childhood development. Services provided include psychosocial support (PSS). The District has been adhering to the conditions and providing services in accordance with the laid down guidelines of the STPA. 6.2.10. VDC Guidelines, 2001 These guidelines govern management of VDCs on committee procedures, facilitating the planning, implementation, monitoring and feedback accounting to the community expectations. It provides for procedures on election of committee, function of the committee and management of VDC property. 63 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Southern District reports that a number of these VDCs are in arrears on payments due, and also report that poor management undermines effective functioning. 6.2.11. Health The Ministry of Health is mandated with oversight and delivery of health services at all levels; primary health care moved from local government to health in 2010. Health services are guided by the National Health Policy, updated in 2011 (Ministry of Health, 2011); the 2002 Public Health Act is due to be updated as well. It is also worth noting that while Botswana has good access to modern health services and infrastructure, there are disparities in terms of doctor/patient ratios. Most of the districts had a patient/doctor ratio of fewer than 300 patients per doctor with the exception of Kweneng East, which had a patient/doctor ratio of more than 500 patients per doctor. The scarcity of doctors in certain areas has implications for efficient health care provision in the country. Currently there are 14 clinics in Southern District, but 13 new clinics are required to keep up with population growth. Government intends to phase out health posts and upgrade these to clinics, but this is expected to take a number of years. There are 53 health posts in Southern District, of which 19 are currently due to be upgraded. The following health facilities and services exist in Southern District (Statistics Botswana, 2012a): Nº Facility Facility Location Other Information Referral Hospitals (0) none General Hospitals (2) 1 SDA, Kanye 28 Mat. 36 Paed. 6 Isol. 18 TB. 6 Priv. 79 0ther. (Total: 167 beds) 1 Jwaneng 6 Mat. 11 Paed. 11 Priv. 3 ICU. 56 0ther. (Total: 87 beds) Primary Hospitals (1) 1 Good Hope 14 Mat. 21 Gen. (Total 35 beds) Clinics (29) 5 Southern (Kanye) 5 Jwaneng 11 Good Hope 8 Moshupa Health Posts (46) 2 Southern (Kanye) 25 Good Hope 19 Moshupa Mobile Stops (20) 20 Good Hope Table 12. Southern District Health Facility List (2009). Source: Health Statistics Unit, Statistics Botswana, 2012c. 64 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN According to the Master Health Facility List for 2009 (Ministry of Health, 2009), there were twenty nine health districts around the country (up from 24 in 2007), some of which aligned with sub-district boundaries. Southern District is served by two General Hospital (SDA or Seventh Day Adventist in Kanye and in Jwaneng), one Primary Hospital (Good Hope), twenty-nine community clinics, forty six health posts in settlements and 20 mobile stops. In 2009 Southern District was being served by 15 (8 male and 7 female) professional doctors, 1 male professional physiotherapist and 183 (41 male and 142 female) professional nurses (Statistics Botswana, 2012c). In 2009 in Southern District, 100% of the inhabitants lived within a 5 km radius of a health facility. 6.2.11.1. Hospital Services The district health system consists of four levels of service provision: mobile stops or outreach services, health posts, clinics, and primary and district hospitals. The mobile stops or outreach services provide services to areas without static health facilities. Health posts are manned by a Registered Nurse (with or without Midwifery training and in some cases by 2 – 3 of them if the facility is a busy one) may supervise mobile stops. Clinics have a greater scope of activities and as such require more senior nurses. One clinic may supervise a number of health posts, and serve as referral centres for health posts. Primary and district hospitals serve as referral centres for council health facilities. Southern district has one primary and one district hospital. They act as referral hospitals for the district. Under DDP6, two new hospitals were planned to be constructed in Moshupa and Mabutsane but were not funded. However during consultations, communities expressed the need for a referral hospital in Kanye. 6.2.11.2. Tuberculosis TB/HIV co-infection is high in the district and TB cases have been increasing as a result. The co- infection in the district is similar to the situation in the rest of the country which stands at between 60% and 80% (District TB Annual Report 2006). The TB notification rate is 602 per 100 000 population. Total number of TB patients for the whole of Southern district was 1,170 in year 2007. The district is running the TB programme in which those infected are given Daily Observed Treatment, tracing of contacts and patients follow up are done as prescribed by the Botswana National Tuberculosis Programme (BNTP) guidelines. 6.2.12. HIV&AIDS As with much of the rest of Botswana, Southern District is affected by HIV&AIDS. BAIS IV from 2013 puts the national prevalence rate of HIV&AIDS at 16.9%. BAIS IV prevalence was found to be higher among females than males at 19.2% versus 14.1%, respectively. Rates are shown in the map to the right, with rates in Southern District consistent with similar to other areas of the country. BAIS IV notes that the Southern District rate for 2013 (11.8%) is similar to rates for 2004 (12.4%) and 2008 (13.3%). The rate of male circumcision (which reduces the risk of HIV infection among males) was 25.4% for Southern District, close to the national norm of 24.5%. The following figure shows HIV seroprevalence rates by district: 65 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Figure 10. HIV Seroprevalence Rates by District Brief descriptions of the villages of Thamaga and Ramaphatle are included here as they are affected by the project and are not located in Southern District. Thamaga is a large village located in Kweneng District about 40km west of the capital city, Gaborone. The 2011 census recorded a population of 21,471 inhabitants making it the third largest settlement after Molepolole and Mogoditshane in Kweneng District. A breakaway group of the Bakgatla-ba-ga-Mmanaana tribe from Moshupa, just 17 km to the southwest in Southern District, settled there in the mid-1930s. Neighbouring Ramaphatle had a population of 719 inhabitants in the 2011 census. Kweneng District is served by 24 clinics (8 with maternity and 16 without maternity wings), 36 Health Posts and 75 Mobile stops, Scottish Livingstone District Hospital in Molepolole as well as Thamaga Primary Hospital in Thamaga. The role of the Thamaga Primary Hospital in the health system is to provide diagnostic services for both out and in- patients as well as to accommodate those who need hospitalization. The district hospital (Scottish Livingstone) has recently been expanded. Thamaga primary hospital has a bed capacity of 39. The two facilities serve as referral centres for council health facilities. Both the district and primary hospital refer to Princess Marina Referral Hospital in Gaborone. The two facilities also refer to other specialized hospitals for cases that need specialised care. There are two junior secondary schools and four primary schools in Thamaga and a primary school in Ramaphatle. 66 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 7. POTENTIAL IMPACTS This is based on potential impacts identified as part of the Social Impact Assessment and as part of activities undertaken in preparation of the RAP itself. 7.1. AFFECTED POPULATIONS Mapping of communities proximate to the project area during the scoping exercise led the consultants to identify 11 villages that, it is believed, will be directly or indirectly affected by the project. For the SIA, consultations, Local Level Key Informant Interviews and Focus Group Discussions were held with Dikgosi and/or members of the VDC’s and residents at these locations. During Road reserve site survey identify affected area and from this area identify each village ploughing land, affected area , fencing and other affected area. from this land survey classify type of land ,owner of the land, individual conatcact to property owners and calculate number of PAPs. which detail ref in cost estimation table. 1. Jwaneng: S24º36.346 E24º43.845 Population: 18,016 Population Males: 9,838 Population Females: 8,178 NO IMPACT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED. 2. Sese: S24º39.432 E24º47.982 Distance from Sese Turnoff: 3.27 km Population: 2,721 Population Males: 1,333 Population Females: 1,388 The Primary school had 19 teachers, 20 classrooms and 514 pupils enrolled in 2009. There is a clinic, agricultural services and numerous shops. Contractors who are employed at the diamond mine in Jwaneng prefer to live in Sese as the costs are lower than in Jwaneng, which is approximately 15km to the west by road. 8 AFFECTED PLOTS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED: - Surface affected: 11,125.59 m2 - Fence affected: 537.14 m - PAPs affected: 53 Detailed data on each of the 8 affected plots can be found in appendix 1 and 2. 67 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 3. Betesankwe Population: 389 Population Males: 202 Population Females: 187 The Primary school had 7 teachers, 4 classrooms and 127 pupils enrolled in 2009. There is a Kgotla and a headman, who reports to the Kgosi of Sese village. There is no clinic and a 10km sandy track links the small community with Sese, where health and agricultural services, shops and transport services are accessed. NO IMPACT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED. 4. Sesung: S24º53.171 E25º00.295 Distance from Sesung Turnoff: 7.89 km Population: 752 Population Males: 351 Population Females: 401 The Primary school had 10 teachers, 7 classrooms and 226 pupils enrolled in 2009. 3 AFFECTED PLOTS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED: - Surface affected: 2,415.12 m2 - Fence affected: 743.51 m - PAPs affected: 4 Detailed data on each of the 8 affected plots can be found in appendix 1 and 2. 5. Selokolela: S24º57.289 E25º07.179 Distance from Selokolela Turnoff: 9.55 km Population: 1,610 Population Males: 740 Population Females: 870 The Primary school had 16 teachers, 12 classrooms and 446 pupils enrolled in 2009. 3 AFFECTED PLOTS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED: - Surface affected: 187.44 m2 - Fence affected: 129.68 m - PAPs affected: 4 Detailed data on each of the 8 affected plots can be found in appendix 1 and 2 6. Moshana (Moshaneng): S24º54.336 E25º14.346 68 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Distance from Moshana Turnoff: 2.68 km Population: 1,512 Population Males: 712 Population Females: 800 6 AFFECTED PLOTS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED: - Surface affected: 475.29 m2 - Fence affected: 206.72 m - PAPs affected: 36 Detailed data on each of the 8 affected plots can be found in appendix 1 and 2 7. Kanye: S24º58.104 E25º20.090 Distance from Kanye-Thamaga Junction: 4.97 km Population: 47,013 Population Males: 21,606 Population Females: 25,407 The 14 primary schools had 291 teachers, 272 classrooms and 8,027 pupils enrolled in 2009. NO IMPACT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED. 8. Moshupa: S24º46.803 E25º25.360 Distance from Kanye Roundabout: 17.23 km Population: 20,016 Population Males: 9,095 Population Females: 10,921 2 AFFECTED PLOTS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED: - Surface affected: 168.95 m2 - Fence affected: 53.71 m - PAPs affected: 4 Detailed data on each of the 8 affected plots can be found in appendix 1 and 2 9. Lotlhakane West: S24º48.614 E25º18.292 Distance from Moshupa: 14.39 km Population: 1,637 Population Males: 744 Population Females: 893 The Primary school had 26 teachers, 22 classrooms and 654 pupils enrolled in 2009. 12 AFFECTED PLOTS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED: 69 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN - Surface affected: 5,911.25 m2 - Fence affected: 2,381.17 m - PAPs affected: 20 Detailed data on each of the 8 affected plots can be found in appendix 1 and 2 10. Thamaga: S24º40.464 E25º32.473 Distance from Thamaga SW Turnoff: 2.56 km Population: 21,471 Population Males: 9,762 Population Females: 11,709 NO IMPACT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED. 11. Ramaphatle: S24º41.884 E25º36.228 Distance from Thamaga NE Turnoff: 4.24 km Population: 719 Population Males: 373 Population Females: 346 NO IMPACT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED. 7.2. IDENTIFICATION OF LIKELY SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS In this sub-section, the impacts on the populations noted above are elaborated. In addition, affected populations at the road itself are also described. Impacts can be described in terms of quality (positive, neutral or negative), significance (imperceptible, slight, moderate, significant or profound), duration (temporary, permanent, short-term, medium-term or long-term) and type (cumulative, 'do nothing', indeterminable, irreversible, residual, synergistic or 'worst case'). Throughout the ESIA process, the following factors have been considered when determining the significance of the impacts, both positive and negative, of the proposed development on the various aspects of the receiving environment: • The quality and sensitivity of the existing environment. • The relative importance of the environment in terms of national, regional, or local importance. • The degree to which the quality of the environment is enhanced or adversely affected. • The scale of change in terms of land area, number of people impacted, number and population of species affected including the scale of change resulting from all types of impacts. • The consequence of that impact/change occurring. • The certainty/risk of the impact/change occurring. 70 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN • Whether the impact is temporary or permanent. • The degree of mitigation that can be achieved. Impacts may be wide-ranging in nature. This includes the potential to be direct or indirect, secondary, cumulative, short, medium or long-term, permanent or temporary, positive or adverse effects. Therefore, in an effort to construct a methodology for impact assessment terminology, Loci uses the following scales when referring to nature and severity of impact: Scale of Change Description of Scale Negative A change that reduces the quality of the environment Neutral A change that does not affect the quality of the environment Positive A change that improves the quality of the environment Table 13. Description of Scale of Change Used in Impact Assessment Severity Level General Description Environmental parameter will remain largely unaffected by positive or adverse Negligible impact. Impact unnoticeable in general. Environmental parameter little affected by the positive or adverse impact, to a Slight/Low point whereby the impact may or may not be noticed by the receptors affected. Mitigation can alleviate all or most slightly adverse impacts. Development causes a degree of impact that will cause a noticeable change in Moderate/Medium the environment by a majority of receptors affected. Mitigation measures should overcome most moderately adverse impacts. Potential change in the daily experiences of all receptors due to the impact caused by the development. The impact would require a significant change in Significant/High management practices with associated costs. This level of impact would require considerable mitigation measures and not all adverse effects may be overcome. Impact affects 100% of receptors, with no mitigation measures applicable. An Profound environmental parameter may be completely obscured, made void or invalid, or destroyed completely, due to profound adverse effects. Table 14. Description of Severity Levels Used in Impact Assessment Duration Approximate Length of Impact Predicted Temporary Predicted to occur for approximately one year or less Short-Term Predicted to occur for approximately 1 - 9 years Medium-Term Predicted to occur for approximately 10 - 19 years Long-Term Predicted to occur for approximately 20 - 60 years Permanent Predicted to occur indefinitely Construction Period Predicted to occur for the length of construction phase only Table 15. Description of Change Duration Used in Impact Assessment 71 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Aside from basic impacts on the existing environment, additional impacts likely to be identified within this report include cumulative and residual impacts, defined as follows: Cumulative Impact: The addition of many small impacts to create one larger, more significant impact. Residual Impact: The degree of environmental change that will occur after the proposed mitigation measures have taken effect. Cumulative and residual impacts are considered below. Impacts have been divided into construction and operations phases. A table overview is first provided, along with initial comments about mitigation and enhancement. This is preceded by an overall summary impact statement. 7.3. CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS Construction impacts are a mix of positive and negative impacts, with no social residual impacts assuming effective mitigation of natural environment impacts (e.g., proper handling of borrow pits). Findings are summarised in the following table: Direct/ Impact Arena Description of Impacts Direction Severity Location Indirect Roads Impacts Directly Minor impacts are expected on some Negative Significant At Construction Direct Affected households due to infrastructure present Sites Households in the road reserve. Directly The Archaeological Impact Assessment Negative Significant Road Reserve Direct Affected has indentified areas of possible social Areas of significance. For Package 1, there are Social two abandoned cattle posts and one Importance abandoned kraal, each of which needs to be considered for gravess. In any case, if necessary, it would be possible to study a realignment to avoid some of the cultural goods listed in this table. S 24°41.578’ E 25°37.456’ Abandoned cattle post (site 1 in the AIA) S 24°43.301’ E 25°30.864’ Abandoned kraal (site 14 in the AIA) S 24°51.412’ E 25°01.443’ Abandoned cattle post (site 40 in the AIA) S 24°58.727’ E 25°20.088’ Traditional kraal & kgotla (site 41 in the AIA) S 24°58.417’ E 25°18.138’ Probable grave (site 43 in the AIA) Construction Once construction is completed in 2 of Negative Significant Near Construction Direct Camps the 3 camp sites, have not been Camp Site identified impacts between neghbouring households . Nor impacts are expected 72 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN in the construction of the third camp site. AIA: Archaeological Impact Assessment included in the EIA report Table 16. Construction Impacts (Duration: Construction Stage) 7.4. OPERATIONAL STAGE IMPACTS Operational impacts are limited but positive as follows: Direct/ Impact Arena Description of Impacts Direction Severity Location Indirect Directly Long-term impacts of resettlement may be Negative Severe Directly Direct Affected negative, unless proper mitigation actions Affected Households are undertaken. Households Table 17. Operational Impacts (Duration: Operations [Life of Road]) 7.5. IMPACT MITIGATION THROUGH ROAD RE-ALIGNMENT The road design has taken into account the impact on property and housing through feed-back between the RAP team and the team of engineers. Through this process, we obtained an optimum layout that eliminates and minimises the impact of the road. The process comprised the following phases: Phase 1: Prior field tours along the initial layout to: • Evaluate the degree of impact. • Identify areas of greatest impact and hot spots. Phase 2: Identify each property affected by the original layout using a GIS tool. Phase 3: Give recommendations to the engineers on how to avoid singular impacts and improve the Alignment. Phase 4: Establish criteria for the OPRC package 1 project with respect to the road reserve and the cleared strip in accordance with the BRDM and identify built-up areas. Phase 5: Field work and surveys on affected property once the layout has been improved. Phase 6: Identify, evaluate and establish compensations on all property definitely affected. Below are some examples: 73 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Figure 11. Road alignment in Selokolela. Initial alignment in green-white colour, final re-alignment to avoid impacts to two houses. Figure 12. Road alignment in Sese.Initial alignment in orange-white colour, final re-alignment to avoid impacts to several houses. 74 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 7.6. MITIGATION MEASURES 7.6.1. Introduction Mitigation actions are identified by ‘key mitigation arenas’, and thereafter described for each impact, using the ‘construction’ and ‘operations’ tables above. 7.6.2. Specific Mitigation Activities: Construction Specific mitigation activities for the construction phase are indicated in the following table: Affected Severity After Impact Arena Direction Key Mitigation or Enhancement Population Mitigation Resettlement Directly affected Negative OP 4.12 and the ESMF and RAP Unless OP 4.12 is households and guidelines issues by the Department followed, negative institutional of Roads requires prior notification impacts will continue structures. of resettlement to all affected with loss of assets. persons and institutions. This must With OP 4.12, and with precede construction activities. effective monitoring and Individual RAPs must be designed remedial actions, no with affected households and long-term impacts are institutions during the first stage of expected. RAP implementation. Anyway, it should be recorded that resettlement is limited only to the expropriation of small portions of the property and nowhere is all home required to be resettled. Directly Community overall. Negative During implementation of the RAP If effectively mitigation, Affected under a Resettlement Action no further impacts. If Areas of Programme, community level consultations at Social consultations are required by community level are not Significance Department of Roads on this social handled well, potential infrastructure. Possible need for for serious delays to grave relocation and alterations to construction as disputes alignment as technically possible. arise. Ground truth each site with local VDC or representative during RAP implementation, and if available family members. Design resettlement plan for each that needs to be relocated. Construction Households Negative Hire as possible from areas Despite codes of Camp proximate to the proximate to the work sites, so that conduct and efforts to camps. daily transport home is possible. support positive Strict rules around camp access. behaviour and mitigate Code of conduct for workers at the negative behaviour, site including specific desired social pathologies in the behaviours around the camp. Code area around the of conduct for alcohol consumption construction camps are in the area for those staying at the expected to be high. site. Table 18. Construction Impacts 75 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 7.6.3. Specific Mitigation Activities: Operations Specific mitigation activities for the operations phase are indicated in the following table: Affected Severity After Impact Arena Direction Key Mitigation or Enhancement Population Mitigation Resettlement Directly affected Negative Design and implement monitoring Depends on the results households and system to establish impacts of of monitoring, and institutions. resettlement actions for directly follow-on remedial affected households. actions. With proper Based on the findings from impact monitoring and effective monitoring, institute remedial remedial actions, no actions. negative long-term Report on agreements for impacts expected. institutions and removal and relocation/ re-establishment of infrastructure. Table 19. Operational Impacts 7.7. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Initial results of road alignment suggests that all potentially affected private buildings can be avoided through minor road realignment, consistent with both regulations and OP 4.12. For affected properties, it is important to note that there is widespread concern about the low values of compensation for property lost to involuntary resettlement under Botswana regulations, which are considered inadequate for the purposes of re-establishing lost infrastructure. OP 4.12 is quite clear in this regard, underlined by the Department of Road’s (2008: 26) finding that the main gap between Botswana Government regulations of OP 4.12 “is related to their main objectives. The World Bank OP 4.12 first and foremost is a policy document, whose operational principles are also informed by key social development objectives, which is to restore, if not improve the livelihood of affected persons, while the national compensation guidelines is mainly an operational guidance to acquire land and compensate asset losses for a public interest investment”. Based on findings from the field, it is concluded that low compensation values represent the most serious threat to effective mitigation. Under Government regulations, the loss of natural resources not under direct ‘ownership’ by a household is not compensated, but can be mitigated through agreement with local authorities on how to manage the resources lost (e.g., cut bush provided as firewood resources for fair local distribution, such as made available for households caring for orphans and other vulnerable children, destitute households, etc.), natural products pre-harvested before destruction, relocation of unique resources as required, and avoiding areas where substantial local resources exist (e.g., clay, gravel) that would be lost to the new infrastructure. Specific provision needs to be made for any lost fruit trees, crops, or shade trees as well. Alignment may affect infrastructure under specific government departments. If so, the Department of Roads would need to negotiate with the relevant ministry to remove and replace this infrastructure. 7.7.1. Summary Impacts Summary impacts are as follows: 76 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Resettlement impacts are minimal. As per OP 4.12 and Botswana Compensation Guideliness, resettlement impacts have been minimised through road realignment. No family will be moved, the road will partially impact some plots avoiding the buildings. For the Moshupa to Lothakane West (A10-1-AR2-B) the establishment of a fence along the 30 meter road cleared strip will affect existing crops. This impact on crop areas will be minimal: a narrow strip less than de 5 meter wide along the road alignment. 7.7.2. Conclusions and Recommendations Key conclusions are as follows: • No affected persons is displaced • Less than 10% of the productive assets are affected • Resettlement impacts are minimal, but require the design and implementation of a Resettlement Action Plan. Key recommendations are as follows: • The Resettlement Action Plan should be designed and implemented, taking care to ensure fair compensation, following the Resettlement Framework developed by the Department of Roads. Plans should be developed for each affected household, and agreed during RAP first stage implementation before implementation of Project civil works. These plans should be monitored, working closely with affected households. Appendix 1 AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING includes the description and plan view of each of these affections 8. SCOPE OF THE RESETTLEMENT PLAN According to OP 4.12, “In projects where no affected persons is displaced and less than 10% of the productive assets are affected or where fewer than 200 people are displaced, a resettlement action plan will be prepared.” A Resettlement Action Plan has been prepared before the proposed project is appraised by the World Bank. 77 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 9. CONTENTS AND SCOPE OF THE RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN In line with World Bank OP 4.12 requirements, resettlement plans would include procedures to ensure that the displaced persons are: a) Informed about their options and rights pertaining to resettlement b) Consulted on, offered choices among, and provided with technically and economically feasible resettlement alternatives c) Provided prompt and effective compensation at full replacement cost for losses of assets and access attributable to the project d) Enabled to restore and preferably improve their living standards compared to pre-project ones. In accordance with the EPF, national laws and WB policy the Resettlement Action Plan covers the following minimum elements: • A census of the displaced persons and valuation of assets • Description of compensation and other resettlement assistance to be provided • Consultations with displaced people regarding acceptable alternatives • Institutional responsibility for implementation and procedures for grievance redress • Arrangements for monitoring and implementation • A timetable and budget Additionally the present report includes information about: • Description of the project • Policy, legal and institutional framework • Socio-economic baseline description 10. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR PROJECT AFFECTED PERSONS AND LIKELIY CATEGORIES In line with the World Bank Policy, any person who suffers loss of or damage to an asset or loss of access to productive resources, as a consequence of the implementation of any of the road projects under the OPRC would be considered eligible for compensation and/or resettlement assistance, provided the damage or loss is caused by the project and satisfies the conditions of the cut-off date. Thus all project affected persons irrespective of their status or whether they have formal titles, legal rights or not, squatters (on this project there is not squatters) or otherwise are eligible of assistance if they occupied the land before the cut-off date. In accordance with the World Bank Safeguard Policy OP 4.12, displaced persons may be classified in one of the following three groups: 78 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN a) Those that have formal legal rights to land (including customary and traditional rights recognized under the laws of the country) b) Those who do not have formal legal rights to land at the time the census begins but have a claim to such land or assets provided that such claims are recognized under the laws of the country or become recognized through a process identified in the resettlement plan. c) Those who have no recognizable legal right or claim to the land they are occupying. Those covered under a) and b) above are to be provided compensation for the land they lose, and other assistance in accordance with the World Bank Policy. Persons covered under c) are to be provided with resettlement assistance if they occupy the project area prior to a cut-off date. AS per the RPF the following categories are not eligible for compensation: • Improvement carried out after the cut-off-date • Loss of rights when the use of the land is in conflict with the use for which the land is zoned • Loss of improvements when they are in conflict with the land use zoning, unless the affected person can demonstrate that improvements were carried out with the authority of the land board or prior to the zoning of the land in question. The likely impacted/affected parties can be classified into five groups namely: Individual- an individual who suffers loss of assets or investments, land and property and/or access to natural and/or economical resources as a result of the project activities and to whom compensation is due. Household - a household is affected if one or more of its member’s losses assets or investments, land and property and/or access to natural and/or economical resources as a result of project activities. Vulnerable households - includes those below poverty datum line, the landless on communal land, the elderly, women, children, orphans, those afflicted by HIV/AIDS, and indigenous people. These groups of people are identified through the socio-economic and baseline study. These groups of people are normally marginalized and often do not have a voice. Identifying them ensures that special attention would be paid to them by identifying their needs and ensuring that they are not left out in the participatory process of the project activities. Special attention is paid to monitoring them to ensure that their pre- project livelihood is indeed improved and are given technical and financial assistance if they wish to make use of the grievance mechanisms of the project. Host communities - strain on existing infrastructure and services resulting from the increased population resulting from the resettlers. Communities - (when common goods such as schools, meeting places, place of worship are affected). 79 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 11. CENSUS OF THE AFFECTED PERSONS AND VALUATION OF ASSETS 11.1. METHODOLOGY USED TO CARRY OUT THE IDENTIFICATION OF PAPS This contribution is based on activities undertaken in preparation of the RAP and of potential impacts identified as part of the Social Impact Assessment. In that chapter, specific information is given on each affected household. This contribution focuses on the policy framework for resettlement. The process of identifying affected persons and properties by roads is based on both; GIS analysis and fieldwork. The methodology to determine those affected has the following phases: • Previous fieldwork. Fieldwork carried out in previous phases by identifying general road impacts (May- June 2014) • GIS Analysis. Intersecting the topography maps (fences, houses, signs, lampposts,…) with the Road reserve and Cleared strip areas. This process identifies preliminary households affected. • Final fieldwork. Final identification of households affected through a detailed field survey of the possibly affected points as identified in the GIS analysis, described above. Affected households were interviewed and completed questionnaires. GIS Analysis To identify the possible impacts early, the topography dwg file (cad file) was converted to a shapefile format (basic GIS format). The fence and houses layers were given preference. Buffers to the axis roads were created using the “buffer” GIS tool. These buffers were created to draw the Road reserve (61 meters) and the Cleared strip (30 meters). A collection of file records for each possible impact was created with GIS intersect tool, which calculates those shapefiles that intersect. Each recorded field contains detailed information such as the centroid of the element (residential plot e.g.), the element/structure that may be affected (fences, houses,..), the axis of the road, the road Reserve area and Cleared strip limits, a graphic scale and the centroid coordinates in WGS84 UTM 35S. In addition, to facilitate better identification, a Google Earth or Bing Aerial orthoimage was used as a base. In some cases this orthoimage does not align with the linear shapefiles (axis and road reserve and cleared strip buffers). 80 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Figure 13. An Example of the file record generated by GIS software 81 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Final fieldwork Fieldwork was performed with the support of the GIS record files. The social team was moved to the field from 11 to 17 August 2014 to carry out a detailed on-field identification of the affected assets The guidelines criteria set out in Chapter “5.7 –Cleared strip and Road Reserve ”were considered. Interviews and questionnaires Once the affected assets were identified, an interview with each household was conducted in order to know, among other data, the number of people living in the household and the condition or socio- economic status . name, Relationship to HH, Sex, Age, Education, Still in School, Current Employment Status, etc.. Once a identified affected plots, consultations have been conducted, both individual and collective. The method used in individual interviews was, after meeting with the Chief in each village, which helped to identify the owners, have a meeting with each of them, asking the questionnaire data of the Table 20. The methodology used in collective consultations, was to convene a meeting in the Kgotla in each village (between October 8 and October 15, 2015), to explain the project and resolve existing issues and doubts of affected and unaffected by the project. Also, at these meetings have formed grievances committees in each village. Additionally, the following questionnaire was filled in: Questionnaire Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle Total number of scotch carts Total number of sheep Total number of computers Total number of goats Total number of bicycles Total number of donkeys Total number of fields Total number of horses/ponies Total number of houses Total number of chickens Total number of toilets Total number of pigs Total number of kraals Total number of radios Total number of sheds Total number of TV’s Total number of fencing Total number of cell phones Total number of trees Total number of refrigerators Total number of wells Total number of beds Total number of boreholes Total number of cars Comment 82 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Table 20. Questionnaire used In appendix 2, are included all the questionnaires that have done to each of the PAPs. In appendix 3 is included the convening of meetings in the municipalities and the minutes of meeting each one of them. AFFECTED ASSETS According to the guideline stated in the previous chapter of Cleared strip and road book, which is based on the BRDM, there are two distinct situations in terms of the impact on the road: unbuilt areas built-up areas. In unbuilt areas, the road reserve, fence and cleared strip affect the surroundings. In built-up areas, there is neither road reserve nor fence. The required cleared strip affects the properties. For all the above, this chapter shall be divided into: • Main roads (A10 - A2) • Access roads Most of the impact occurs in built-up areas. The following figure shows these built-up areas sections and the types of impact identified. 83 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Figure 14. Built-up areas in yellow colour, impacts to residential units in red stars. 84 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 11.1.1. Main roads (A10 - A2) 11.1.1.1. Main roads (A10 - A2) unbuild up areas Based on the records file that identifies assets that encroach on the 61m “Road Reserve Area Limit” and/or the 30m “Cleared Area Limit” for main roads, the social team visited each site to gather information on the ground. Those assets identified with substantial encroachment on the “Road Reserve Area Limit” were photographed and are further described in this report, but not regarded as directly impacted. No assets were found within the 30m “Cleared Area Limit” for main roads. No impact has been identified. 11.1.1.2. Main roads (A10 - A2) build up areas All properties with affected assets that were found within the 30m “Cleared Area Limit” were recorded and described and interviews were conducted with the head or senior member of the household, if they were available on up to three consecutive visits. As the only assets (excluding land) that will be affected, would be fences or walls, the estimated length of fencing that a directly affected property will lose has been valued according to Land Board guidelines (Schedule of Compensation Rates for Tribal Areas, Ministry of Lands and Housing, Dept. of Lands, April, 2010) at BWP62 per running metre (standard 1.2m high diamond mesh). No impact has been identified. 11.1.2. Access Roads 11.1.2.1. Access Roads unbuilt areas Since the Moshupa to Lothakane West section runs through a cropland landscape and that crops still next to the A10-1-AR2-B road. Most of the A10-1-AR2-B runs through cropland, with boundaries very close to the local road which falls, therefore, within the 30 m cleared strip area. Placing a fence from Moshupa to Lothakane West will affect the fields. The land will have to be expropriated and the farmers compensated. The same occurs in the access road to Sesung, A2-5-AR3 (two Affected plots) and the access road to Sese, A2-5-AR4 (three Affected plots). 16 affected plots have been identified. The surface affected is shown in the following table: 85 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Affected Crops Section Assigned Plot Code m2 0-01 174.24 0-04 479.63 0-05 197.16 0-06 378.58 0-07 1,365.50 A10-1-AR2-B 0-08 628.36 0-02 1,545.24 0-09 132.00 0-10 420.49 0-03 265.85 0-11 315.63 1-20 2,347.85 A2-5-AR3 1-21 38.26 1-14 46.33 A2-5-AR4 1-22 840.73 1-23 35.35 TOTAL 9,211.20 Table 21. Affected crops area The affected plot data sheets are in appendix 1. 11.1.2.2. Access Roads built-up areas All impacts will be localised along the built-up area of towns and villages. All properties with affected assets that were found within the 30m “Cleared Area Limit” were recorded and described and interviews were conducted with the head or senior member of the household, if they were available on up to three consecutive visits. The descriptions that follow below are of properties likely to be directly affected by the upgrading of the Moshupa, Moshana, Selokolela and Sese access roads. As the only assets (excluding land) that will be affected, would be fences or walls, the estimated length of fencing that a directly affected property will lose has been valued according to Land Board guidelines 86 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (Schedule of Compensation Rates for Tribal Areas, Ministry of Lands and Housing, Dept. of Lands, April, 2010) at BWP62 per running metre (standard 1.2m high diamond mesh). Detailed data on each of the 22 affected plots can be found in appendix 1 and 2. Locations where directly affected properties were identified are the following: 11.1.2.2.1 A10-1-AR1-1-C Moshupa Access Road In Mosupha 2 areas of impact have been identified on the A10-1-AR1-C road, with the identification numbers 1-01 and 1-02. The surface affected is shown in the following table: Affected Crops Section Assigned Plot Code m2 1-01 81.80 A10-1-AR1-C 1-02 87.15 TOTAL 168.95 Table 21.1 Affected urbans area Figure 15. Moshupa impact points. 87 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 11.1.2.2.2 A10-1-AR2-A Moshupa to Lothakane West Access Road In Moshupa one area impact has been identified on the A10-1-AR2-A road, with the identification number 1-03. The surface affected is shown in the following table: Affected Crops Section Assigned Plot Code m2 A10-1-AR2-B ´1-03 8.57 TOTAL 8.57 Table 21.2 Affected urbans area Figure 16. Moshupa impact points. 11.1.2.2.3 A2-5-AR1 – Moshana Access Road In Moshana 8 areas of impact have been identified on A2-5-AR1 road, with the identification numbers 1-04 to 1-09, 1-08A and 1-08B. The surface affected is shown in the following table: Affected Crops Section Assigned Plot Code m2 1-04 69.50 1-05 7.07 1-06 87.52 A2-5-AR1 1-07 7.87 1-08 176.83 1-09 126.50 TOTAL 475.29 88 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Table 21.3 Affected urbans area Figure 17. Moshana impact points. 11.1.2.2.4 A2-5-AR2 – Selokolela Access Road In Selokolela 5 areas of impact have been identified on A2-5-AR2 road, with the identification numbers 1-10 to 1-12, 1-10A and 1-10B. The surface affected is shown in the following table: Affected Crops Section Assigned Plot Code m2 A2-5-AR2 1-10 119.80 1-11 27.56 1-12 40.08 TOTAL 187.44 Table 21.4 Affected urbans area 89 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Figure 18. Selokolela impact points. 11.1.2.2.5 A2-5-AR3 - Sesung Access Road In Sese access road 1 area of impact have been identified on A2-5-AR3 road, with the identification number 1-13. The surface affected is shown in the following table: Affected Crops Section Assigned Plot Code m2 A2-5-AR3 1-13 29.01 TOTAL 29.01 Table 21.5 Affected urbans area 90 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Figure 19. Sesung impact points. 11.1.2.2.6 A2-5-AR4 - Sese Access Road In Sese access road 6 areas of impact have been identified on A2-5-AR4 road, with the identification numbers 1-14 to 1-19. The surface affected is shown in the following table: Affected Crops Section Assigned Plot Code m2 1-14 46.33 1-15 88.93 1-16 78.30 A2-5-AR4 1-17 17.57 1-18 10.67 1-19 7.71 TOTAL 249.51 Table 21.6 Affected urbans area 91 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Figure 20. Sese impact points. 11.1.3. Questionnaires Based on the methodology described, potentially affected plots were identified using GIS analysis on orthophotograph and a buffer zone. Following this approach, field visits were made to identify the plots on-site and measure them using tape measure to ensure that the affected areas had been correctly identified. Once the potentially affected plots had been identified, relevant surveys were carried out. However, this was not always possible. Sometimes the property owner was not present despite having visited on up to three occasions. Because the road design aimed to affect the population as little as possible, the layout was modified and adjusted to these determining factors. The end result is that there are 34 affected plots and surveys were carried out on 34. These surveys are included in appendix 2. The following table shows the affected plots in each access road, its identification code and if have performed questionnaire or not. SECTION CODE QUESTIONNAIRE 0-01 YES 0-04 YES 0-05 YES A10-1-AR2-B 0-06 YES 0-07 YES 0-08 YES 92 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 0-02 YES 0-09 YES 0-10 YES 0-03 YES 0-11 YES 1-01 YES A10-1-AR1-C 1-02 YES A10-1-AR2-A 1-03 YES 1-04 YES 1-05 YES 1-06 YES 1-07 YES A2-5-AR1 1-08 YES 1-09 NO A2-5-AR2 1-10 NO 1-11 YES 1-12 YES 1-13 YES A2-5-AR3 1-20 YES 1-21 YES 1-14 YES 1-15 YES 1-16 YES 1-17 YES A2-5-AR4 1-18 YES 1-19 YES 1-22 YES 1-23 YES Table 22. Questionnaires in Access Roads As the only assets (excluding land) that will be affected, would be fences or walls, the estimated length of fencing that a directly affected property will lose has been valued according to Land Board guidelines 93 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (Schedule of Compensation Rates for Tribal Areas, Ministry of Lands and Housing, Dept. of Lands, April, 2010) at BWP62 per running metre (standard 1.2m high diamond mesh). Location of assets are shown on the orthoimages, also each record file includes the identification code of the questionnaire and the conditions of the affected fence (with valuation in BWP). Photographs of each affected asset are included as well as data regarding the household and the questionnaire completed by the head of household. 94 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 11.2. SUMMARY OF IMPACTS The area and fence length that could be affected is shown in the following table: SECTION TO CODE Length (m) Area (m2) 0-01 65.00 174.24 0-04 135.00 479.63 0-05 144.00 197.16 0-06 271.00 378.58 0-07 294.67 1365.50 A10-1-AR2-B Lothakane West access road 0-08 296.18 628.36 0-02 342.80 1545.24 0-09 159.34 132.00 0-10 123.08 420.49 0-03 186.54 265.85 0-11 358.16 315.63 SUBTOTAL A10-1-AR2-B 2,375.77 5,902,68 1-01 23.42 81.80 A10-1-AR1-C Moshupa access road 1-02 30.29 87.15 SUBTOTAL A10-1-AR1-C 53.71 168,95 A10-1-AR2-A Lothakane West access road 1-03 5.40 8.57 SUBTOTAL A10-1-AR2-A 5.40 8,57 1-04 61.49 69.50 1-05 8.16 7.07 1-06 29.80 87.52 1-07 8.12 7.87 A2-5-AR1 Moshana access road 1-08 46.69 176.83 1-09 52.46 126.50 SUBTOTAL A2-5-AR1 206.72 475.29 A2-5-AR2 Selokolela access road 1-10 50.71 119.80 1-11 24.22 27.56 1-12 54.75 40.08 SUBTOTAL A2-5-AR2 129.68 187.44 A2-5-AR3 Sesung access road 1-13 19.35 29.01 95 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 1-20 669.06 2347.85 1-21 55.10 38.26 SUBTOTAL A2-5-AR3 743.51 2,415.12 1-14 28.15 46.33 1-15 87.14 88.93 1-16 42.94 78.30 1-17 22.28 17.57 A2-5-AR4 Sese access road 1-18 9.97 10.67 1-19 9.00 7.71 1-22 267.87 840.73 1-23 69.79 35.35 SUBTOTAL A2-5-AR4 537.14 11125.59 TOTAL ACCESS ROADS 4,051,93 20,283.64 Table 23. Area and fence length that could be affected in Access Roads. Upon analysing the 34 affected plots 34 are family dwellings. The data obtained from 34 surveys carried out (see surveys in Appendix 2), are shown in the following table. RELATION Nº Household head 34 Spouse 18 Child 29 Sibling 24 Other relative 57 TOTAL 128 total number plots affected 34 total number families affected 34 As the only assets (excluding land) that will be affected would be fences or walls and no direct impact on buildings has been identified none of these 128 people will be displaced by the Project. 12. ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES AFFECTED During the ESIA exercise for the OPRC package 1 an archaeological assessment was done and an Archaeological Impact Assessment has been included within the ESIA report. 96 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Implementation of the proposed mitigation measures has been included within the RAP scope; therefore, the Resettlement Report includes those mitigation measures for the identified archaeological sites. For detailed information see the ESIA and AIA report. Site significance assessment was based on the five-tier system (1-5) prescribed by the BNMM (Botswana National Museum and Monuments). Associated mitigation recommendations were done according to the system prescribed by the BNMM. BNMM SITE SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION RECOMMENDATION 1 Preserve at all costs 2 Preserve if possible, otherwise extensive salvage work 3 Test excavation to determine whether further work is necessary 4 Systematic representative sampling necessary 5 No further archaeological work required Table 24. BNMM mitigation requirements A total of 51 sites were identified during the survey. Of these 10 are archaeological sites and 5 sites are of social significance. The table and figure below shows the details of those sites. These sites, which are located within the road reserve area, are documented and described in appendix 3. 97 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLANT SITE BNM Road section Coord_X Coord_Y UTM_X UTM_Y TYPE BNMM No. Category 1 25.624267 -24.692967 360823 7268350 Abandoned cattle post Social Significance S 2 25.615167 -24.697133 359907 7267880 LIA No further archaeological work required 5 Test excavation to determine whether 3a 25.607300 -24.697833 359112 7267794 EIA -Baratani kraal 3 further work is necessary Test excavation to determine whether 3b 25.606100 -24.698167 358991 7267756 EIA -Baratani settlement 3 further work is necessary Test excavation to determine whether 4a 25.599750 -24.698383 358348 7267725 LIA -Kwena midden 3 further work is necessary Test excavation to determine whether 4b 25.598367 -24.698250 358208 7267739 LIA -Kwena 3 further work is necessary 5 25.588267 -24.693750 357181 7268227 LIA No further archaeological work required 5 6 25.578883 -24.690117 356228 7268619 LIA -Kwena No further archaeological work required 5 7 25.571050 -24.687633 355432 7268886 ESA No further archaeological work required 5 A10-1 8 25.562883 -24.685600 354604 7269102 LIA No further archaeological work required 5 9 25.550767 -24.686300 353378 7269012 LIA No further archaeological work required 5 10 25.539750 -24.691933 352270 7268376 Historical No further archaeological work required 5 11 25.532850 -24.692317 351573 7268326 Historical No further archaeological work required 5 12 25.529283 -24.693550 351213 7268186 MSA No further archaeological work required 5 13 25.522967 -24.697400 350579 7267753 ESA No further archaeological work required 5 14 25.514400 -24.721683 349741 7265054 Abandoned kraal Social Significance S 15 25.511317 -24.725417 349434 7264637 LIA No further archaeological work required 5 16 25.503933 -24.730533 348693 7264062 ESA No further archaeological work required 5 17 25.495683 -24.736767 347866 7263363 Historical cattle post No further archaeological work required 5 Systematic representative sampling 18 25.492733 -24.737767 347569 7263249 MIA -Eiland 4 necessary 98 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN SITE BNM Road section Coord_X Coord_Y UTM_X UTM_Y TYPE BNMM No. Category 19 25.450367 -24.753483 343303 7261460 LIA No further archaeological work required 5 Systematic representative sampling 20 25.443383 -24.759117 342604 7260828 MIA -Eiland 4 necessary 21 25.442233 -24.766267 342497 7260035 LIA No further archaeological work required 5 22 25.444683 -24.771333 342751 7259477 Historical No further archaeological work required 5 28 25.413933 -24.811417 339693 7255002 LIA No further archaeological work required 5 Systematic representative sampling 29 25.403967 -24.821950 338699 7253823 MIA -Eiland/Early Moloko 4 necessary Systematic representative sampling 30 25.385400 -24.857567 336869 7249857 LIA -pot burial 4 necessary Systematic representative sampling 31 25.372583 -24.867417 335587 7248750 Iron smelting dump 4 necessary 32 25.370033 -24.869500 335332 7248516 LIA No further archaeological work required 5 33 25.364383 -24.876333 334770 7247753 LIA No further archaeological work required 5 23b 25,417183 -24,776800 339977 7258840 Historical village No further archaeological work required 5 A10-1-AR1-A 23c 25,418583 -24,781050 340124 7258370 Historical village No further archaeological work required 5 A10-1-AR1-B 23a 25,421383 -24,779000 340405 7258601 Historical village No further archaeological work required 5 24 25,359250 -24,798383 334148 7256380 Historical fields No further archaeological work required 5 25 25,330067 -24,806633 331209 7255431 LIA No further archaeological work required 5 A10-1-AR2-B Systematic representative sampling 26 25,321683 -24,808550 330364 7255208 LIA -Early Moloko 4 necessary Systematic representative sampling 27 25,323183 -24,807667 330514 7255307 MIA -Broadhurst 4 necessary A2-4 34a 25,299967 -24,949283 328363 7239593 LIA No further archaeological work required 5 A2-4-AR1 41 25,334800 -24,978783 331920 7236369 Traditional kraal & kgotla Social Significance S 99 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN SITE BNM Road section Coord_X Coord_Y UTM_X UTM_Y TYPE BNMM No. Category 42a 25,344700 -24,985317 332929 7235658 Historical village No further archaeological work required 5 42b 25,345483 -24,986567 333009 7235521 Historical village No further archaeological work required 5 42c 25,353000 -24,995283 333780 7234564 Historical village No further archaeological work required 5 43 25,302300 -24,973617 328632 7236901 Probable grave Social Significance S 34b 25,295700 -24,949600 327933 7239553 LIA No further archaeological work required 5 34c 25,294050 -24,948283 327764 7239697 LIA No further archaeological work required 5 A2-5 Systematic representative sampling 35 25,261233 -24,940850 324440 7240478 LIA -burned kraal 4 necessary 36 25,229783 -24,928533 321246 7241801 LIA No further archaeological work required 5 A2-5-AR1 37 25,236667 -24,918483 321927 7242923 ESA No further archaeological work required 5 38 25,114367 -24,947083 309617 7239589 Historical village No further archaeological work required 5 A2-5-AR2 39 25,118033 -24,948750 309990 7239410 MSA No further archaeological work required 5 A2-5-AR3 40 25,024050 -24,856867 300351 7249453 Abandoned cattle post Social Significance S S – Social Significance; 4 – Systematic representative sampling necessary; 5 – No further archaeological work required Table 25. Characteristics of archaeological sites 100 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Figure 21. Location of archaeological sites 101 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 12.1. MITIGATION MEASURES FOR THE IDENTIFIED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES Archaeological sites A BNMM mitigation requirement category 3 is recommended for sites 3 and 4. This implies that test excavations be executed to determine whether further work is necessary. A BNMM mitigation requirement category 4 is recommended for sites 18, 20, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31 & 35. This implies the documentation of the site and a systematic representative sampling of the artefacts is necessary. a) Early Iron Age (EIA) One Early Iron Age site was identified within the road reserve areas. A BNMM mitigation requirement category 3 is recommended for site 3. This implies that test excavations be executed to determine whether further work is necessary. b) Middle Iron Age (MIA) Four Middle Stone Age sites were identified within the road reserve areas. A BNMM mitigation requirement category 4 is recommended for site 18, 20, 27 & 29. This implies the documentation of the site and a systematic representative sampling of the artefacts is necessary. c) Late Iron Age (LIA) Five Late Iron Age sites were identified within the road reserve areas. A BNMM mitigation requirement category 3 is recommended for site 4 . This implies that test excavations be executed to determine whether further work is necessary. A BNMM mitigation requirement category 4 is recommended for site 26, 30, 31 & 35. This implies the documentation of the site and a systematic representative sampling of the artefacts is necessary. Sites of social significance A total of 5 sites of social significance were identified within the road reserve areas. These sites comprise • 1 probably grave. • 1 abandoned kraals, • 1 traditional kraal & kgotla, • 2 abandoned cattle posts. They are of social rather than archaeological significance and recommendations as per the social impact assessment should be complied with. It is important to note, that some of the properties listed as "social significance", are actually the property of persons, notwithstanding their state of derecliction, the owners have to be consulted. 102 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Graves A probable grave was identified during the survey at plot 1. Gravesites are protected under the PHA and should be conserved. Alternatively they may be relocated subject to the prescribed grave relocation procedures as negotiated with the affected parties. If the developer wishes to conserve the gravesite, it is recommended that the gravesite should be signposted, fenced and administered by a grave management plan. It is important to note that graveyards are not the archaeological sites. Any test excavations and or salvage archeology should be governed by the Monuments abd relics Act of 2001 and consultation with department of National Museum and Monuments must be made prior to excavation of any archaeological site and or property. Chance finds of unknown human remains and archaeological material may occur during development at the settlements. Such human remains can be of archaeological or historical context and are subject to the provisions of the Public Health Act, the Monuments and Relics Act and the District Council regulations. It is recommended that a watch brief be implemented during development at these sites. If human remains are encountered during the development, the BNMM should be notified as soon as possible. Mitigation measures proposed by the Archaeological Impact Assessment and included within the EIES report are summarised in the table below: Description Sites Measure Test excavations be executed to determine Early Iron Age Site 3 whether further work is necessary Documentation of the site and systematic Middle Iron Age Sites 18, 20, 27 & 29 representative sampling of the artefacts Test excavations be executed to determine Late Iron Age Site 4 whether further work is necessary Documentation of the site and systematic Late Iron Age Sites 26, 30, 31 & 35 representative sampling of the artefacts Table 26. Mitigation measures for Archaeological sites identified 103 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Description Sites Measure Caution should be implemented during the development as not to disturb the graves, special field recognition for unfenced Cemeteries cemeteries. Cemeteries are of social significance and recommendations as per the social impact assessment should be complied with. They are of social significance and recommendations as per the social impact Abandoned Kraals assessment should be complied with. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and Site of Social monitoring program be implemented during Significance development. It is important to note, that some Traditional kraal & of the properties listed as "social significance", kgotla are actually the property of persons, notwithstanding their state of derecliction, the owners have to be consulted. It is of social significance and recommendations as per the social impact assessment should be complied with. Due to Abandoned cattle the possible occurrence of unidentified graves posts in the kraal and house, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Table 27. Mitigation measure for sites of Social Significance 104 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 13. CONSULTATIONS WITH PROJECT AFFECTED PERSONS 13.1. PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS This Chapter outlines the consultations undertaken with the Project stakeholders during the scoping and detailed Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) phases of the Project. The consultations were related to all Project activities addressed in the study. The stakeholder consultation process developed and followed by the consulting team was guided by relevant environmental and social assessment guiding documents such as IFC Performance Standards of 2012, Equator Principles of 2013 and EA Act No. 10 of 2011. 13.2. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN This Subsection presents the Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP) developed and followed for the proposed OPRC Roads Contract project. The SEP was designed to guide consultations with the Project stakeholders. Therefore, this SEP sets out the approach which the consulting has followed and will continue to follow to consult with the Project stakeholders. For the purposes of this Project, a stakeholder is defined as “a person, group or organisation that is affected or can be affected by the environmental and/or social consequences of a proposed project activity”. Although the SEP focuses primarily on consulting with external stakeholders, there are other “internal” stakeholders such as Project contractors, staff, shareholders etc, however, engagement with these stakeholders is not covered in this SEP. 13.2.1. Objectives of the Stakeholder Engagement Plan To adhere to the World Bank OP 4.12 requirements, the SEP was designed for the proposed development to allow for the effective participation of those identified as stakeholders throughout the project implementation period. The WB regards stakeholder engagement as the foundation for building strong, constructive, and responsive relationships that are essential for successful management of a project’s environmental and social impacts. The undertaking of public and stakeholder consultation is also a legal requirement during the environmental scoping and ToR stage of the EIA process (Section 7 of EA Act of 2011). In relation to these, the Project Contractor (Elsamex) is committed to a transparent and considerate dialogue with all key stakeholders of the Project. In principle, the aims of stakeholder engagement are to: • Promote the development of courteous and open relationships between stakeholders and the project team. • Identify project stakeholders and understand their interests, concerns and influence in relation to the project activities. • Provide stakeholders with timely information about the proposed development and the ESIA processes, as well as other relevant project information. This is recommended by the Equator Principles (2013) to be undertaken in ways that are appropriate to stakeholders’ interests and needs (taking into account factors such as location, language, culture, access to information),as well as the level of expected adverse impact. 105 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN • Give stakeholders an opportunity (through consultation and other feedback mechanisms) to express their opinions and concerns in relation to the proposed project. Comments raised by stakeholders must be reflected in the ESIA report and decisions made about the project activities, where possible. • Record and resolve any grievances arising from project related activities. It should be noted that the undertaken stakeholder engagement activities to date, have been guided by the preliminary and detailed ESIA assessments, including relevant legislations such as the EA Act No. 10 of 2011, IFC Performance Standards of 2012 and Equator Principles of 2013. Further consultation with stakeholders will continue to be undertaken in compliance with these legislations and in alignment with the overall management of the Project environmental and social impacts. 13.2.2. Stakeholder Engagement Approach Used The adopted stakeholder engagement approach for the Project ESIA process summarised below, was followed to ensure that stakeholders are informed and have input into the Project planning (including ESIA process) and development activities. Comments raised by stakeholders have been considered in the overall ESIA assessment and design of the Project components. The stakeholder engagement approach adopted for the project engagement/consultation involved the following key elements (as recommended by the afore-mentioned documentation): • Disclosure: Reveal and disseminate relevant Project and ESIA (about environmental and social issues as well as opportunities that have potential to benefit the affected community) information timely and in understandable language. • Consultations: Consult stakeholders about issues that may affect them, record their views and respond to questions and concerns accordingly. • Involve: Working directly with the public throughout the process to ensure that public concerns and aspirations are consistently understood and considered. • Collaborate: Partner with the stakeholders in major aspect of the Project decision, including the development of alternatives and the identification of the preferred solution. • Grievance Resolution: Put in place a transparent and fair mechanism, at no cost to stakeholders, to record and resolve community grievances throughout the project cycle. • Project Impacts Management: Establish an Environmental and Social Management Systems/Plan to manage environmental and social issues. Following the adopted stakeholder engagement plan, the ESIA team identified the project stakeholders, as detailed in the subsequent subsections. 13.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis and Mapping An essential element in the stakeholder engagement process (in order to ensure meaningful and effective consultation process) is the careful identification of all involved stakeholders and the 106 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN examination of their concerns, expectations and preferences. Furthermore, the IFC Standards highlight that special attention should be paid to the identification of vulnerable stakeholders who may be extremely affected by the Project activities, due to their marginalised or vulnerable status. The consultation and dialogue with these stakeholder groups need to be planned and managed with special care (IFC Performance Standards, 2012). This Subsection describes how Project stakeholders (including vulnerable groups) were identified to date. Subsection “Consultation Methodologies Used” describes how the results of this analysis were used to identify tools and materials, as well develop consultation methodologies to consult with the stakeholders in ways appropriate to their needs. The identification of the Project stakeholder was based on the following: • Environmental and Social Team’s knowledge of the Project area • Desktop research including reviews of existing information about the study area (including previous ESIA reports near the project area) • Feedback from consultations with stakeholders familiar with the study area. The forthcoming subsections list the stakeholders identified to date, while detailed analysis of the major key stakeholders is provided in the SIA report attached on this project as Appendix X. Outcomes of the consultations carried out with these stakeholders are summarised in Section 8.2 within this Chapter. 13.3. AFFECTED COMMUNITIES Mapping of communities proximate to the Project area (during the scoping exercise) resulted in the identification of 14 villages likely to be directly or indirectly affected by the Project. Therefore the general public residing within the following listed villages were regarded as the potentially affected communities: • Jwaneng • Sese • Betesankwe • Pitseng • Seherehela • Sesung • Selokolela • Moshana • Kanye • Moshupa • Lotlhakane West • Thamaga • Ramaphatle • Mmankgodi. By consulting these communities, the ESIA team has sought to engage with stakeholders who are most likely to be interested in, or affected by the proposed roads development works. 107 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 13.4. DIRECTLY AFFECTED INDIVIDUALS AND INTERESTED ORGANISATIONS (IAPS) The consultation process also targeted a range of directly affected individuals (plot and property owners whose properties were likely to be affected), Village Development Committees (VDCs), Governmental (Botswana) organisations, Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs), vulnerable groups and other representatives from other interested organisations. After identification of relevant project stakeholders, consultation methods were identified for the Project consultation, as outlined in Subsection below. 13.4.1. Consultation Methodologies Used Several methods were used to consult with members of the public and stakeholders. These included methods listed in the Table below and detailed below. Consultations Method Telephone calls Facsimiles Communications Advertisements Notices Formal meetings Interviews Informal visits Organised public consultation at dikgotla Meetings Meetings/presentation to district officials Table 28. Consultation methods used (public and stakeholders) As listed in the Table above, communicating with the public and stakeholders, regarding the Project, involved the use of: • Telephones to reach the stakeholders and to be reached by interested parties/public. • Faxes to and from the stakeholders. • Newspaper advertisements to inform the public about the project and public meeting. • Notices to the public regarding the consultation meeting. In order to promote and enhance constant dialogue with all Project stakeholders as required by relevant legislations, the consulting team will periodically evaluate the use of additional communication methodologies. 108 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 13.4.2. Public Consultation Meetings As a part of the implementation of the ESIA process, the consulting team organised and conducted a series of public meetings at the villages likely to be affected by the Project construction activities. However, Pitseng, Seherelela and Ramaphatlhe villages were excluded from the initial public consultation meetings programme undertaken during scoping phase, as the expectation is that no major roads development works will be carried out at these areas. Nevertheless, the stakeholders in these villages will be consulted during another round of stakeholder consultations to be conducted for the Project (as described in Section 8.4 below). As required by the EA Act No. 10 of 2011, a newspaper advert informing the affected communities about the meetings was publicised in a local newspaper, 21 days prior to the dates of the meetings. The public meetings were facilitated by the representative of Loci Environmental, with occasional input from TYPSA Environmental and Social team as well as the Contractor’s representatives. All public meetings were recorded, and audio files are available on request. A detailed summary of the public meetings conducted to date, is provided in Subsection below. After ESIA process and during RAP public consultation meetings conducted at various locations which detail as below • Moshupa kgotla – 08th October 2015 at 09:00 hours • Sese Kgotla – 09th October 2015 at 09:00 hours • Sesung Kgotla – 12th October 2015 at 08:00 hours • Selokolela Kgotla – 13th October 2015 at 09:00 hours • Moshana Kgotla – 14th October 2015 at 09:00 hours • Lothalkane West Kgotla -- 15th October 2015 at 09:00 hours Individual base contact to affected property owner’s also communicated by loud speaker announcement before 3 day, before one days and same day morning , contact to Village chief for communications regarding public consultation meetings, information letter put on village administration office notice boards. During the kgotla meetings explain about project, communicated process of compensation, organised Grievance committees from each village also explained about importance of Grievance committees. During the consultations provide detail about questions regarding employment, project detail. Type of Project, work period of project, difficulties for projects etc 109 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Individual Consultations were also undertaken for the directly affected parties which included potentially affected land owners, land boards, tribal administrations, districts officials and national level Government officials. The consultations and liaison were undertaken by the consulting team to inform the stakeholders about the project and to record their views in relation to the proposed development. Affected properties owners detail list refer detail estimation table. Following list for properties affected persons & institutions consulated during kgotla Meeting Sr. Village No of Persons institution No 1 Moshupa 48 persons (women -25 & 23 Men) VDC, Moshupa sub District Education Department , Village Police 2 Sese 62 persons (women -30 & 32 Men) VDC, Church, Education department , Village Police 3 Sesung 52 Persons (24 Men & 28 women) District Education Department , Village Police, VDC 4 Selokolela 57 Persons (27 women & 30 Men) VDC, District Education Department , Village Police 5 Moshana 64 Persons ( 28 women & 36 Men) VDC, Village Police 6 Lothalkane 72 persons (35 women & 37 Men) VDC, Village Police West 13.4.3. Stakeholder Meetings As with the public meetings, multiple stakeholder consultation meetings were also conducted by various ESIA specialists and the Contractor’s representatives in relation to the ESIA studies and the Project technical issues. The outcome of the stakeholders consultation conducted to date is summarised in Subsection below. 110 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 13.4.4. Interviews with Land Owners and Other IAPs Consultations were also undertaken for the directly affected parties which included potentially affected land owners, land boards, tribal administrations, districts officials and national level Government officials. The consultations and liaison were undertaken by the consulting team to inform the stakeholders about the project and to record their views in relation to the proposed development. The minutes of the meetings held with directly affected parties are provided in the ESIA Report. Similarly, the results of these consultations are included in Appendices 1 and 2, including affections and number of PAPs. 13.4.5. Focus Group Discussions A focus group is a form of qualitative research in which a group of people, having common concerns, are asked a set of questions and respond accordingly. This method was used during the anthropological study (Social Impact Assessment exercise) and was facilitated by a social consultant. Group discussions were held with household heads of poor households and female headed households in Moshupa and Lotlhakane West villages, as representing the others villages. 13.4.6. Disclosure of Project Information In accordance with the World Bank OP 4.12 Performance Standards, a Project Information Document (PID) has been developed for the Project. The Document is to be disclosed in conntry and and at the World Bank Info-shop in Washington.The Document was also used to compose relevant ESIA components such as the questionnaire tool utilised to gather social data. 13.5. RESULTS OF THE STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PROCESS In accordance with the EA Act (2011) requirements, the Project stakeholder consultations begun during the scoping exercise and was continued during the detailed ESIA phase. To date, a series of informal and formal engagements to gather feedback and information for the ESIA processes were undertaken. The primary results of consultation activities undertaken are summarised below. 13.5.1. Summary of the Public Consultation Meetings The undertaking of public consultation is a legal requirement during the environmental scoping and ToR stage of the EIA process (Section 7 of EA Act). The meetings are held to ensure that any public concerns, issues or questions will be addressed during the actual undertaking of the EIA. This Section presents the outcome of the public meeting undertaken for the proposed project to date. Public Meetings Schedule (Venues and Dates) The public consultation meetings for the Project were scheduled as follows: • Jwaneng kgotla - 20th May 2014 at 8:00 hours • Sese kgotla – 20th May 2014 at 14:00 hours 111 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN • Betesankwe kgotla - 21st May 2014 at 8:00 hours • Sesung kgotla – 21st May 2014 at 14:00 hours • Selokolela kgotla – 22nd May 2014 at 8:00 hours • Moshana kgotla – 22nd May 2014 at 14:00 hours • Kanye kgotla – 23rd May 2014 at 8:00 hours • Lotlhakane West kgotla - 23rd May 2014 at 14:00 hours • Moshupa kgotla – 24th May 2014 at 8:00 hours • Thamaga kgotla - 26th May 2014 at 8:00 hours • Mmankgodi kgotla - 26th May 2014 at 14:00 hours. 13.5.2. Meetings Advertisement As required by the EA Act (2011) the dates for the meetings were advertised in the Daily News newspaper on the 5th May 2014, 21 days prior to the meetings dates. A copy of the meeting advertisement is attached on this document as Appendix D. In addition to the advertisements, the following methods were implemented to ensure the local residents were aware of the meetings, and satisfactory attendance was achieved during the meetings: • Distribution of A3 size posters at Tribal Administration offices. • Request for the local dikgosi to announce the meetings in other meetings prior to these public meetings. 13.5.3. Consultation Proceedings and Attendance The consultations generally followed the same agenda, commencing with introduction of the meeting attendants. Introductions would be followed by the welcome remarks from the chief. With the objective to ease communication barriers, the presentations were delivered in Setswana and English languages. Presentations were done by Loci Environmental (with support from the Contractor’s representative), including: • A Brief Background on the EIA Process The consultant informed the meeting attendants that the Environmental Impact Assessments undertaken for the proposed project aims to assess the potential effects of the planned developmental activities, in order to determine and to provide mitigation measures for effects that may have a significant adverse impact on the environment, as required by the EA Act of 2011. He mentioned that the process is coordinated by Department of Environmental Affairs under the Ministry of Environment and Tourism on behalf of the Government of Botswana. 112 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN In relation to the project, the meeting attendants were informed that the EIA process was at Scoping level, following DEA authorisation that a detailed EIA be undertaken for the development. He mentioned that this stage involves gathering of information about the study area as well as consultation with the affected community, hence the kgotla meeting undertaken. Information gathered during the scoping exercise will be used during the impact assessment exercise, to be carried out after the approval of the scoping and ToR report, with the construction activities only commencing after the approval of the EIA report (Environmental Impact Statement) by DEA. • Technical Project Description The consultant informed the community that the proposed contract (Package 1) will include the upgrade of approximately 123.3 km long main roads A10-A2. A series of access roadsconnects the main project road with the adjacent villages and the improvement of these roads to paved Road Type 5A will be performed under the initial works although these roads are excluded for further road maintenance under this contract. Each access road has its start point in the intersection with the main roads and the end point at the local kgotla where a parking area will be prepared. The proposed works will also include the rehabilitation/improvement of approximately 52 km of access roads. The access roads relevant to the proposed Package 1 contract were mentioned to include the following: – Moshupa access road of approximately 7.6 km; – Lotlhakane West access road of approximately 12.7 km; – Kanye access road of approximately 8.4 km; – Moshana access roads of approximately 3.1 km; – Selokolela access road of approximately 9.6 km; – Sesung access road of approximately 7.9 km; and – Sese access road of approximately 3.3 km. The Government of Botswana, through the Ministry of Transport and Communications (Department of Roads), has appointed Elsamex INTL to undertake the proposed development on their behalf. The contract was mentioned to be undertaken in ten years and is funded by the Government with financing from World Bank. The attendance at the public meetings was satisfactory as many of the local residents attended the meetings. The following is a list of the number of people who attended at each venue: • Jwaneng kgotla:15 • Sese kgotla:45 • Betesankwe kgotla:39 • Sesung kgotla:100 • Selokolela kgotla: 94 113 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN • Moshana kgotla:146 • Kanye kgotla: 186 • Lotlhakane West kgotla:64 • Moshupa kgotla: 214 • Thamaga kgotla: 64 • Mmankgodi kgotla: 13 Attendance lists were taken during all the consultation meetings, and the full meetings were recorded. Audio files will be kept on record and can be availed when required. A summary of the key comments and concerns raised during the public meetings included: • Employment related issues: o Localisation of employment opportunities through engagement of local structures (VDCs and dikgosi) during the employment process. o Employment of local residents without relevant experience and qualifications. o Compensation of injured employees during the project activities. o Possible occurrence of unfair dismissal of employees and poor working conditions. • Water related issues: o Possible depletion of underground water following substantial extraction of water for the project activities. o Compensation of affected parties (borehole owners) if water is depleted due to the project activities. o Rental of existing boreholes within the affected villages for the project activities during the construction (refurbishment of the existing roads) and maintenance phases of the project. • Corporate Social Responsibility initiative recommended: o Rental of the VDC houses within the affected villages for the project employees during the construction (refurbishment of the existing roads) and maintenance phases of the project. o Subcontracting other project activities to local companies. • Land related issues: o Compensation of affected land owners if required to relocate. • Construction related impacts likely to affect the communities: o Potential destruction (cracking) of houses located along the roads to be developed 114 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN o Disturbances of significant sites and social activities o Noise and dust generation from road construction and maintenance activities 13.5.4. Summary of the Stakeholder Consultations In addition to the public consultations undertaken, relevant stakeholders were interviewed to gather more on insight on the issues and concerns in relation to the project. The discussion started with a brief introduction and technical description of the Project, as well as background information. Local level key informant interviews were held with dikgosi and/or VDC members in Thamaga, Moshupa, Lothakane west, Kanye, Moshana, Selokolela, Sesung, Sese and Jwaneng villages. During the local level consultations, associated key risks requiring mitigation in the event of possible relocation in those villages were also discussed. District level key informant interviews were conducted at the Southern District headquarters in Kanye. Several government departments and Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) were also consulted at national level. The key issues raised by the key stakeholders in relation to the proposed project were as follows: • On-going communication with the affected community was viewed to have potential in facilitating a productive and proactive relationship between the project and the community. • Employment and entrepreneurship opportunities should be reserved for the local community as they will be adversely impacted by the proposed project. • Housing alternatives for the construction workers should consider renting VDC houses from the affected villages. • Land related issues: o Loss of land (grazing and residential land) following the road alignment and construction activities. o Possible relocations of affected ploughing fields and residential plots. o The Proponent will be required to compensate the affected parties. • Influx of people, HIV/AIDS and crime at the affected villages. • Substantial water requirement during project construction and maintenance activities. • Possibilities of inappropriate disposal of hazardous materials and used oils from construction machinery. • Possibilities of groundwater contamination from sanitation facilities utilised at the construction site. 115 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN • Emissions and dust impacts on human health (particularly project personnel and residents residing near the project site). • Destruction of wildlife habitats during project pre-construction activities (linear clearance of vegetation). • Temporary disturbance of road use and agricultural activities during the construction and refurbishment activities of the project. 13.5.5. Other Technical Consultations and Data Collection In addition to the ESIA consultations, a number of organisations were also consulted by the ESIA specialists to gather specific technical data and input. The results and data from these consultations have been incorporated in the various specialist reports appended to the ESIS. 13.6. CURRENT CONSULTATION ACTIVITIES Stakeholder liaison (by the Contractor representatives and certain ESIA specialists) is on-going with relevant government departments, districts officials, land boards and directly affected individuals in relation to issues associated with the implementation of the Project. 14. INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND PROCEDURES FOR GRIEVANCE REDRESS 14.1. IMPLEMENTATION Are included below the roles and responsibilities in resettlement implementation of the different organizations involved, as well as a schedule of implementation of the procedure proposed. 116 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Roles and responsibilities in Resettlement Implementation No Organizations Roles and responsibilities 1 Republic of Botswana ERA manages , coordination (planning and Ministry of Transport and implementation process); Budget allocation for communications Road project; Monitoring and Evaluation Department 2 Department of Ensure that the Social and Environmental Policies Environmental Affairs (DEA) and guidelines are followed up 3 Regional Governmental Provide Political and Administrative support for the States implementation of the project 4 Zonal Administrations Coordinate the differentvillages affected by the project; coordination of restoration methods for PAPs. 5 Monitoring Consultant (MC) Responsible for the implementation of the project activities, establish compensation committees at village level, ensure that PAPs are compensated as per the federal and regional guidelines. 6 Grievances Comittes Responsible for the implementation of Project activities in town sections; establish compensation committees at village level; ensure that PAPs are compensated as per federal and regional guidelines; awareness creation, grievance redress. Proposed Implementation Schedule for both permanent and temporary Structures 117 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Period Period Period Quarter Quarter Quarter Major Activities 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Assessment and evaluation X X of Compensation Formation & strengthening X X of project implementation & redress committees Education and awareness X X Creation about RAP procedures and compensation payment Stakeholder Consultation X X X X Approval and payment for X X X X X compensation for both permanent & temporary properties as well as supplemental assistance Grievance redress measures X X X X X X X X Monitoring and Evaluation X X X X X X X Completion Report writing X In line with the World Bank’s OP 4.12 and the MOT’s 2006 RPF, implementation of RAP activities shall be monitored regularly to ensure those actions have proceeded in accordance with provisions in the RAP. Will be responsible for the internal monitoring of the day to day implementation of this RAP. External monitoring will be carried out periodically by the Works Department of the two MC and the DEA. Furthermore, external consultants or NGOs would be hired to evaluate and audit the implementation. The purpose of this internal monitoring is to maintain responsibilities of the resettlement implementation institution. The services of an external consultant monitoring organization would be procured regularly independent monitoring and evaluation on activities of this RAP. The purpose of independent monitoring is to provide an evaluation and to review the overall implementation from a broader, long-term point of view. The Policy Planning and Monitoring & Evaluation Directorates of the MoT will co-ordinate the activities of all the monitoring agencies. 118 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Monitoring Role Cast Actors Role Lead Agency and coordination institution for both Policy Planning & ministry of Transport and internal and external monitoring of the Communications Roads Department implementation of this RAP. Regular monitoring of the Plan implementation and its impact. Regular monitoring to ensure that the approved Land Valuation Board assessed compensation are paid Periodic monitoring of the plan implementation and Department of Environmental affairs its impact. Periodic monitoring , evaluation and auditing of Monitoring Consultant implementation of RAP 14.1.1. During project preparation: The Consultant recruited for the conceptual design of the OPRC component, will attach the RPF as social safeguards specifications in the bidding documents. The Consultant will also develop remedial measures (when, how, how much) that will be deducted from the Contractor if these social specifications are not met, as required by the RPF. During the entire Project’s lifecycle, the Contractor will design and implement all civil works under the OPRC scheme according to the social standards described in the RPF. 14.1.2. During project implementation: The Road Department will control the implementation of the OPRC activities throughout the project lifespan. A Resettlement Plan has been prepared by the Contractor along with the technical engineering design This RAP must be submitted for approval to the Road Department and the World Bank, prior to approval of the proposed engineering design. Once approved, the Plan will be disclosed in-country among the affected communities and at the World Bank prior to its implementation. The Plan should be implemented by the Contractor prior to the start of civil works; specifically, affected people should be compensated before any land taking occurs. 119 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Following programmes must be done during implementation: • Individual household resettlement programmes, needs to include proper valuation by the Land Board • Resettlement programmes for graves and potential graves. All complaints lodged with the Contractor by PAPs should be resolved before payment occurs, provided that the resolution of these complaints is within its capacity. For activities involving land acquisition or loss, denial or restriction to access, it is further required that these measures include provision of compensation and other assistance required for relocation, prior to displacement, and preparation and provision of resettlement sites with adequate facilities, where required. For project activities requiring relocation or loss of shelter, the policy further requires that measures to assist the displaced persons are implemented in accordance with the individual resettlement plan of action. For project activities that restrict access to or income from the use of natural resources, alternative arrangements to secure equal or greater resources through income schemes, alternative assignment of resources, the domestic planting of medicinal plants if possible, and other schemes should be in place before restrictions are fully enforced. RAP contain acceptable measures that link resettlement activity to civil works in compliance with the World Bank Policy. The timing mechanism of these measures ensure that no individual or affected household would be displaced (economically and physically) due to civil works activity before compensation is paid or if resettlement is needed due to other Projects needs along its lifespan resettlement sites, if required, are prepared with adequate facilities and provided for to the individual or homestead affected. The Plan, been prepared along with technical design for the civil works by the Contractor, must be submitted to the Department of Roads for review and approval. Once the resettlement plan is approved by the local and national authorities, the resettlement plan will be sent to the World Bank for final review and approval. Procedurally, implementation of the RAP comprises: • Notification of and participation by project affected persons. • Documentation of holdings and assets. • Agreement on compensation and preparation of contracts for each affected household or business or other. • Compensation payment. • Relocation and takeover, preceded by adequate notice. As per OP 4.12, the RAP notes that “The timing mechanism of these measures would ensure that no individual or affected household would be displaced (economically and physically) due to civil works activity before compensation is paid and resettlement sites, if required are prepared with adequate facilities and provided for to the individual or homestead affected” (Department of Roads, 2008: 42). 120 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN The Contractor shall appoint a Resettlement Co-ordinator, comprising either an individual appointment or a firm, to ensure effective participation by affected persons and affected households. Such engagement will apply for the life of OPRC implementation, guided by the RAP. The Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) should include assessment of the functionality and performance of this arrangement. Impacts will be assessed following resettlement through a Monitoring Consultant, as part of the ESMP. Key indicators include: • Land being used compared to prior to displacement. • Standard of housing compared to before displacement. • Level of participation in project activities. • Number of unresolved complaints. • Level of satisfaction with compensation. • Level of satisfaction with grievance redress. The RAP will include a description of these indicators. 14.2. GRIEVANCE REDRESS The Ministry of Works and Transport, Roads Department shall be responsive to the concerns of the people affected by the project. The individual Resettlement Action Plan can only be approved and compensation contracts signed after the grievance procedure has been clearly outlined and discussed with affected households and affected communities. As much as possible the grievance procedure will be simple, administered as far as possible at the local level to facilitate access. Grievance committees were establishing during consultations (see committee composition in table below), comprising the local kgosi and members of local Village Development Committees and well as members nominated by directly affected households (PAPs). Agreement needs to be reached at this level but, if this is not possible, referral of the case is made to the Compensation Assessment Committee, with right of further referral to the Minister of the Ministry of Lands and Housing, or the Land Tribunal. The final appeal is to the High Court as per the laws of Botswana. The Land Board is a key member of the compensation assessment committee and have offices in all districts and sub-districts and therefore accessible to the PAPs. If the PAP is dissatisfied with the solution provided at that level he/she may seek redress from the Minister of Lands and Housing or Land Tribunal. If still not satisfied, the PAP may appeal to the High Court as provided for in the laws of Botswana. A Community Liaison Officer (CLO) or a delegated member of staff will respond to complaints from the affected communities during the roads construction and refurbishment works. Once a complaint is lodged by a stakeholder, it will be registered in the complaints register and directed to a relevant staff member to address and respond within a specified period. Once the issue is resolved, an official response will be sent to a complainant’s address. In the case whereby the grievance has not been resolved to the complainant’s satisfaction, a reassessment will be conducted and discussions will be held with the complainant in attempt to resolve the matter or to consider further actions necessary. After the accepted resolution has been 121 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN implemented, it will be monitored and its effectiveness will be evaluated. All parties will be notified that the resolution has been implemented and will have the opportunity to provide feedback on the grievance process and its implementation. In the meetings held between October 8 and October 15, 2015, in the Kgotla of each village, grievance committees were formed, for each village, whose names and telephone numbers are included below: GRIEVANCE COMMITTEES Village Name Contact details Comments Mogorosi Ketsile 72622696 Chief Rep. Lawrence Mosweu 73125609/77067598 Owner filling station project Moshupa Bathusi Moage 71222463 Farmers committe Lesego Matlhare 74315687 Village Representative Phenyo Kemmonye 73744368 Affected person and Chief's Rep Mosimanewapitse Dibeela 72957597 Affected person and Chief's Rep Bifelo Mokala 72816985 Affected person Sese Raseolo Kaisara 73128773 Poverty Eradication Committee Temogo Rakodu 73852370 Home Based Care Committee Toba Rabasimane 74904041 VDC Molatedi Kgaodi Chief's Representative Mothibi Kesetse 72970543 Chief's Representative Seolebaleng Letene 74963151 VDC Sesung Kepaletswe Wasekgwa 76392382 Farmer's Committee Ramotlhamme Mogoiwa 73734634 General Community Memner Basianyana Dinake 74929849 Chief Bagoroseng Wadithapo 73939948 Village Representative Emmanuela Motlhajwe 73225071 Village Representative Otshepheng Legabala 74981928 Village Representative Selokolela Peter Leero 73166538 Land Overseer Motlalepula Suping 73171261 Village Representative Ontefile Moalosi 73804947 Village Representative Ditiro Mphoretlhe 75858869 Village Representative Moshana Keletso Ratsie 73029098 Community Representative 122 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Shaleko Marumo 74567090 Affected Ntebogang Marumo 73280160 Community Representative Moeng Thabanyane 75897482 Community Representative Mogorosi Obelwe 75897752 Community Representative Othusitse Setlhabi 75842627 Community Representative Ikanyeng Maphiya 72642665 Affected Bathusi Ngwage 76854764 Community Representative Boitshoko Semathane 71543497 Affected Lotlhakane West Monosi Tshipo 75036367 Community Representative Tshekiso Tlhapa 71293443 Farmers Committe Nkana Botshalangana 71352909 Community Representative Kelebogile Loifi 75891804 Community Representative 15. VALUATION PROCESS AND VALUATION APPROACH The following table includes the category of impacts, the valuation process associated with this resource carried out by the RAP team, categorization of land and/or impact, and valuation approach for package 1: Categorization of Category Valuation process carried out Valuation loss and/or impact Land • Acquire location details of land Loss of residential Full replacement land. cost. • Mark out the boundaries of the area of the land to be affected (Prior to construction) • Determine the size of the land area to be affected Fixed structures, • Take pictures and Loss of location and Full and Temporary measurements of all affected fixed expense for moving remplacement structures properties (both inside and outside) structures cost (movable 123 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN properties) • Note down all property details • Fence walls together with construction details and external works • Ancillary buildings • Other civil works Crops • Stage of growth Loss of food crops Full replacement cost • Size of farm under crops Loss of fruit tress Loss of shade trees Intangible assets • Obtain data on livelihoods of the Disturbance Full replacement affected persons cost Table 29. Identified impacts for Package 1, valuation process and categorization of loss and impacts (source: RPF) The methods for valuation of affected assets are shown in the next table. This value consider from current land board rate and current market rate. Type of loss and methods of valuation Loss of land • Market price • If replacement land is available, it must be the same size and comparable quality as land lost, determinable by the farmer Loss of buildings, fixed • Open market price method structures, and Temporary structures (movable properties) 124 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Loss of trees, perennial • Replacement cost or open market price method. crops, food crops • For vegetable gardens the replacement cost is calculated based on the average amount that an average person or household spends buying vegetables for one year per adult from the local market. • Fruit trees, used for commercial purposes will be compensated at market value based on historical production records. • Fruit trees used for domestic consumption will be compensated based on providing fruit tree seedlings as well as cash payments to offset lost yearly income. • Compensation will be paid to households/individuals for shade tress located on their land. • With regard to compensation for crops, the compensation will cover the average cost of clearing, cultivating, sowing, and weeding. The actual crops will be compensated based upon market value at low season. Loss of business income • Comparative market price/sales compare to businesses in the and loss of business area doing similar business goodwill Disturbances • Comparative market price/sales compare to rental houses in the area Table 30. Type of loss and methods of valuation 16. DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATION AND OTHER RESETTLEMENT ASSISTANCE TO BE PROVIDED As the only assets (excluding land) that will be affected, would be fences or walls, the estimated length of fencing that a directly affected property will lose has been valued according to Land Board guidelines (Schedule of Compensation Rates for Tribal Areas, Ministry of Lands and Housing, Dept. of Lands, April, 2010) at BWP62 per running metre (standard 1.2m high diamond mesh). It is assumed that all lost land would be replaced by the Botswana government of with land adjacent to the property outside the road reserve. Replacement land will be available to affected properties (agricultural fields, homesteads) by the Botswana government, as part of the agreement reached during preparation of the Individual Resettlement Plans during RAP implementation. That land lost will be compensated as per Land Board standard procedures. 125 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Where that is not possible, it is assumed that alternative means of replacement will be arranged, or that the owners will be given the opportunity to determine that no replacement is needed, and offered financial compensation for lost land. While Botswana government regulations do not require compensation for lost fields, compensation for lost inputs onto communal land are compensated. The value would need to be determined as per each individual resettlement plan for each affected property. While replacement product is normally offered, additional compensation is warranted as per Department of Roads guidelines and OP 4.12. Anywise, in case of compensation in cash, the source of funding will be the government of Botswana. Anyhow, we recommend compensating the affected households with the following proposals as mitigation actions to support those affected by resettlement: For a plot where a major portion of a fence is to be affected, the household resettlement programme can recommend that the household be supported in an application to the Land Board for land expansion into another direction, and that the entire fence be replaced as part of resettlement compensation. For fruit trees that need to be replaced or which are part of a garden, beyond direct compensation for each tree removed the household resettlement programme can recommend replacing each tree with two others of the household’s choosing. Schedule 11 of Form 4 of the Compensation Guidelines provides extensive compensation rates that are renewed on a yearly basis. The rates are based on guidelines for the most common types of affected assets, but the Committee also exerts its best judgment on a case by case basis, factoring in various other factors. Compensation rates are reviewed yearly and for improvements they are based on depreciated replacement value. Details of compensation need to be included in each household’s unique resettlement plan, to be prepared during RAP Implementation. RAPs individual preferences for future compensation (money, land extension, want to keep their property, etc ..) is included in Appendix 1. See RAPs table in Appendix 1. Summary table of areas and compensation is included below. Compensation type SECTION TO CODE Length (m) Area (m2) (money-land-..) 0-01 65.00 174.24 Money 0-04 135.00 479.63 Money 0-05 144.00 197.16 Money 0-06 271.00 378.58 Money 0-07 294.67 1365.50 Money Lothakane West access A10-1-AR2-B road 0-08 296.18 628.36 Money 0-02 342.80 1545.24 Money 0-09 159.34 132.00 Money 0-10 123.08 420.49 Money 0-03 186.54 265.85 Land extensión 0-11 358.16 315.63 Money 126 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN SUBTOTAL A10-1-AR2-B 2,375.77 5,902,68 1-01 23.42 81.80 Money A10-1-AR1-C Moshupa access road 1-02 30.29 87.15 Money SUBTOTAL A10-1-AR1-C 53.71 168,95 Lothakane West access A10-1-AR2-A Money road 1-03 5.40 8.57 SUBTOTAL A10-1-AR2-A 5.40 8,57 1-04 61.49 69.50 Money 1-05 8.16 7.07 Money 1-06 29.80 87.52 Money 1-07 8.12 7.87 Money A2-5-AR1 Moshana access road 1-08 46.69 176.83 Money 1-09 52.46 126.50 Money SUBTOTAL A2-5-AR1 206.72 475.29 A2-5-AR2 Selokolela access road 1-10 50.71 119.80 Money 1-11 24.22 27.56 Money 1-12 54.75 40.08 Money SUBTOTAL A2-5-AR2 129.68 187.44 1-13 19.35 29.01 Money A2-5-AR3 Sesung access road 1-20 669.06 2347.85 Money 1-21 55.10 38.26 Money SUBTOTAL A2-5-AR3 743.51 2,415.12 1-14 28.15 46.33 Money 1-15 87.14 88.93 Money 1-16 42.94 78.30 Money 1-17 22.28 17.57 Money A2-5-AR4 Sese access road 1-18 9.97 10.67 Money 1-19 9.00 7.71 Money 1-22 267.87 840.73 Money 1-23 69.79 35.35 Money SUBTOTAL A2-5-AR4 537.14 11125.59 TOTAL ACCESS ROADS 4,051,93 20,283.64 127 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Table 31. Areas and compensation 17. TIMETABLE As per OP 4.12, the RAP notes that “The timing mechanism of these measures would ensure that no individual or affected household would be displaced (economically and physically) due to civil works activity before compensation is paid and resettlement sites, if required are prepared with adequate facilities and provided for to the individual or homestead affected” (Department of Roads, 2008: 42). Detailed schedule showing in compensation and Land acquisition plan. RAP - COMPENSATION AND LAND ACQUSATION PLAN FOR PACKAGE-1 Months Nº TASK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 Project Processing 1.1 Project appraisal 1.2 Project approval 2 Land acqusation and resettlement : Preparation 2.1 Establish Resettlement Committee 2.2 Mark Right of way 2.3 Conduct Detailed measurement survey 2.4 Fix compensation rate and options through the committee meeting 2.5 Finalize the resettlement/ relocation of the study document 3 Land acqusation and resettlement implementation 3.1 Pay compensation fees to land holding groups and Aps 3.2 Construction new houses 128 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 3.3 Land Redistribution/Income restoration /Training 4 Consultation 5 Monitoring Entitlement Matrix Category of Eligibility Type of Loss Entitlements PAP Criteria Loss Of Land Holder of a Title, Compensation at current Market Price Lease holder Compensation at full replacement cost value, mobility, allowance and disturbance Business Owner Loss of Structure Building permit, structure drawings, Three neighbor witnesses and Photographs (of Compensation for missed profit informal properties) Audited accounts, Compensation at current market Account books, Legger price Book 129 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Loss of business Compensation at full replacement income cost, value , mobility allowance and disturbance Lease contract, rental receipts, MOU Loss of temporary structures No loss of land Lease contract, Compensation for advanced rental receipts, MOU lease Compensation for equivalent lease and lost Business tenant Loss of rental Lease contract, Goodwill fee, mobility allowance accommodation rental receipts, MOU and disturbance Loss of good will Loss of land Holder of a title Compensation for land loss. including customary Compensation for equivalent lease and traditional rights recognizable under the Botswana law. Leaseholder Residence owners Loss of structure Building permit, Compensation at full replacement structure drawings, cost value Three neighbor witnesses and Photographs (of informal properties) 130 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Residence Loss of rental Lease contract, Compensation for advance rent accommodation tenant Rental receipts, MOU Lease contract, Compensation for equivalent rental receipts, MOU accommodation or three months lease, mobility allowance and disturbance Vulnerable Comfort and Elderly, Physically Supplementary compensation to Groups security challenged, long –term be settled case by case sick Squatters**/ Loss of use of Three neighbor Assistance in getting title for new encroachers Land witness land, and or/ supplementary assistance, mobility allowance and disturbance Public Relocation of Amenities in Right of Relocation Cost amenities amenities way (ROW) Religious site Loss of structure Holder of a title, Compensation for equivalent leaseholder lease (Church) Building permit, Compensation at full replacement structure drawings cost value **In this project there is no squatters 18. COST AND BUDGET An approach of the costs estimate is showing below and this compensation funding will be arranged by Government of Botswana. Archaeological mitigation measures (Social Significance & Middle Stone Age) Estimation consider from Archaeologiest quotation. Archaeological impact assement rate consider from archiological quotations. 131 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN 18.1. A10-1 ROAD Archaeological mitigation measures Unit cost Cost Description Quantity (BWP) (BWP) Social Significance 2 6,100.00 12,200.00 Early Iron Age Test excavations 1 65,000.00 65,000.00 Systematic Middle Iron Age representative sampling 3 50,000.00 150,000.00 necessary Late Iron Age Test excavations 1 65,000.00 65,000.00 Systematic Late Iron Age representative sampling 2 15,000.00 30,000.00 necessary Total Archaeological mitigation measures 322,200.00 18.2. A10-1-AR1-C ACCESS ROAD Compensation cost Compensation Cost cost per unit (BWP) Description Quantity u. (BWP) Moving and replacement of fence 53.71 m 62 3,330.02 Residential plot; yard (Not built) 168.95 m2 12.50 2,111.88 Trees 2.00 u. 110.00 220.00 Disturbance Allowance 100 % 10.00 566.19 Total compensation costs 6,228.09 18.3. A10-1-AR2-A ACCESS ROAD Compensation cost Compensation Cost cost per unit (BWP) Description Quantity u. (BWP) Moving and replacement of fence 5.40 m 62 334.80 Residential plot; yard (Not built) 8.57 m2 12.50 107.30 Trees 1.00 u. 110.00 110.00 Disturbance Allowance 100 % 10.00 45,060.69 132 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Total compensation costs 45,667.62 18.4. A10-1-AR2-B ACCESS ROAD Compensation cost Compensation Cost cost per unit (BWP) Description Quantity u. (BWP) Moving and replacement of fence 2,375.77 m 62 147,297.74 Developed Cropland 5,902.68 m2 0.80 4,722.14 Trees 158.00 u. 148.91** 23,528.50 Disturbance Allowance 100 % 10.00 17,527.84 Total compensation costs 193,076.22 ** Average rate Archaeological mitigation measures Unit cost Cost Description Quantity (BWP) (BWP) Systematic Middle Iron Age representative sampling 1 50,000.00 50,000.00 necessary Systematic Late Iron Age representative sampling 1 50,000.00 50,000.00 necessary Total Archaeological mitigation measures 100,000.00 18.5. A2-4-AR1 ACCESS ROAD Archaeological mitigation measures Unit cost Cost Description Quantity (BWP) (BWP) Social Significance 2 6,100.00 12,200.00 Total Archaeological mitigation measures 12,200.00 18.6. A2-5 ROAD Archaeological mitigation measures Unit cost Cost Description Quantity (BWP) (BWP) 133 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Systematic representative Late Iron Age 1 50,000.00 50,000.00 sampling necessary Total Archaeological mitigation measures 50,000.00 18.7. A2-5-AR1 ACCESS ROAD Compensation cost Compensation Cost cost per unit (BWP) Description Quantity u. (BWP) Moving and replacement of fence 206.72 m 62 12,816.64 Residential plot; yard (Not built) 475.29 m2 12.50 5,941.12 Stand pipe 1.00 u. 1,300.00 1,300.00 Trees 9.00 u. 189.44** 1,705.00 Disturbance Allowance 100 % 10.00 8,926.28 Total compensation costs 30,689.04 ** Average rate 18.8. A2-5-AR2 ACCESS ROAD Compensation cost Compensation Cost cost per unit (BWP) Description Quantity u. (BWP) Moving and replacement of fence 129.68 m 62 8,040.16 Residential plot; yard (Not built) 159.88 m2 12.50 1,998.50 Undeveloped cropland 27.56 m2 0.30 8.27 Trees 3.00 u. 82.50 247.50 Disturbance Allowance 100 % 10.00 1,029.44 Total compensation costs 11,323.87 18.9. A2-5-AR3 ACCESS ROAD Compensation cost Compensation Cost cost per unit (BWP) Description Quantity u. (BWP) 134 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Moving and replacement of fence 743.51 m 62 46,097.62 Residential plot; yard (Not built) 67.27 m2 12.50 840,87 Undeveloped cropland 2,347.85 m2 0.30 704.35 Trees 129 u. 64.86** 8,367.15 Disturbance Allowance 100 % 10.00 5,601.00 Total compensation costs 61,610.99 Archaeological mitigation measures Cost Description Quantity Unit cost (BWP) (BWP) Social Significance 1 6,100.00 6,100.00 ** Average rate 18.10. A2-5-AR4 ACCESS ROAD Compensation cost Compensation Cost cost per unit (BWP) Description Quantity u. (BWP) Moving and replacement of fence 537.14 m 62 33,302.68 Residential plot; yard (Not built) 249.51 m2 12.50 3,118.87 Developed Cropland 840.73 m2 0.80 672.58 Undeveloped cropland 35.35 m2 0.30 10.60 Stand pipe 2.00 u. 1,300.00 2,600.00 Trees 109.00 u. 119.31** 13,005.06 Disturbance Allowance 100 % 10.00 43,670.98 Total compensation costs 96,380.77 ** Average rate 18.11. BUDGET Following table summarizes the estimated costs : Description Cost (BWP) Compensation cost 444,976.60 Archaeological mitigation measures 490,500.00 Total 935,476.60 135 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Approach to the total budget is of 935,476.60 Botswana Pula. The source of funding for this compensation will be the government of Botswana, as shown in the letter by the road department, included in Appendix 5. 136 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING 137 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES 138 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN APPENDIX 3: MINUTES OF MEETING IN KGOTLA 139 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN APPENDIX 4: ARCHEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED 140 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN APPENDIX 5: CONFIRMATION LETTER FROM ROAD DEPARTMENT 141 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN GENERAL LOCATION ROADS 1 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN MAIN ROADS –NOT ARAPS A10-1 ROAD 2 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN 3 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN 4 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN A10-2 ROAD 5 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN A10-3 ROAD 6 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN A2-4 ROAD 7 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN A2-5 ROAD 8 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN 9 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN 10 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN 11 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN 12 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN 13 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN ACCESS ROADS – NO ARAPS A2-4-AR1 14 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN A10-1-AR1-A 15 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN A10-1-AR1-B 16 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN A10-1-AR2-A 17 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN ACCESS ROADS- PARTIAL ARAPS A2-5-AR1 18 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN A2-5AR2 19 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN A2-5-AR3 20 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN A2-5-AR4 21 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN A10-1-AR2-B 22 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN A10-1-AR1-C 23 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN GENERAL LOCATION IMPACTS TO IN NOT BUILT UP AREAS 24 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A10-1-AR2-B MOSHUPA-LOTHAKANE WEST 0-01 Developed Cropland PLOT 25 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -37415,936 2743062,892 335228,410 7257101,999 REFERENCE -37386,015 2743097,460 335199,000 7257067,000 174,24 B -37374,734 2743108,540 335187,884 7257055,757 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti TYPE - Money/Area m2 loss of right 174,24 0,80 139,39 fence m 65,00 62,00 4.030,00 Phaki Sengwatse & Face to face consultation with affected person. The 72822929 & Trees u 22,00 137,23 3.019,00 Dikatso Moremi - ACQUIRE Money PAP appreciated the project and opted for 72520841 Disturbance % 100,00 10,00 718,84 Siblings monetary compensation. Allowance TOTAL 7.907,23 26 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A10-1-AR2-B MOSHUPA-LOTHAKANE WEST 0-02 Developed Cropland PLOT 27 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -36048,086 2743855,433 333872,417 7256289,580 REFERENCE -35874,417 2743870,473 33699,000 7256272,000 1545,24 B -35712,710 2743881,465 333537,483 7256258,642 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti TYPE - Money/Area m2 loss of right 1.545,24 0,80 1.236,19 fence m 342,80 62,00 21.253,60 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP Children: Trees u 10,00 157,90 1.579,00 74572439/ appreciated the project and opted for monetary Keamogetse ACQUIRE Money Disturbance 5448010 compensation, hopes the Landboard cooperates well % 100,00 10,00 2.406,88 Atlhopheng Allowance with them TOTAL 26.475,67 28 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A10-1-AR2-B MOSHUPA-LOTHAKANE WEST 0-03 Developed Cropland PLOT 29 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -33829,716 2744550,379 331664,616 7255562,271 REFERENCE -33697,208 2744609,719 331533,000 7255501,000 265,85 B -33660,056 2744624,183 331496,066 7255485,994 Real COMPENSATION TYPE DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti - Money/Area m2 loss of right 265,85 0,80 212,68 fence m 186,54 62,00 11.565,48 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP 72522575 or Magadi Trees u 5,00 99,00 495,00 72430212 ACQUIRE Land Extension appreciated the project and opted for monetary Moloi Disturbance % 100,00 10,00 1.227,32 (husband) compensation. Allowance TOTAL 13.500,48 30 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A10-1-AR2-B MOSHUPA-LOTHAKANE WEST 0-04-NEW Developed Cropland 31 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -37370,246 2743112,872 335183,460 7257051,360 479,63 B -37266,090 2743191,902 335080,480 7256970,820 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti TYPE - Money/Area m2 loss of right 479,63 0,80 383,70 fence m 135,00 62,00 8.370,00 Sealo Gare (field Kelebogile Face to face consultation with affected person. owner) - Keboabe (Grand Trees u 23,00 182,22 4.191,00 Money The PAP appreciated the project and opted for Ntwaetsile daughter) - Disturbance % 10,00 10,00 1.294,47 monetary compensation. No room for extention Allowance (Daughter) 71384183 TOTAL 14.239,17 32 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A10-1-AR2-B MOSHUPA-LOTHAKANE WEST 0-05-NEW Developed Cropland 33 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -36955,162 2743462,321 334773,570 7256695.90 197,16 B -36843,609 2743553,345 334663,370 7256603,260 Real COMPENSATION TYPE DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti - Money/Area m2 loss of right 197,16 0,80 157,73 fence m 144,00 62,00 8.928,00 Face to face consultation with affected person. The 74572439 Sebolenki Trees u 23,00 156,87 3.608,00 (Atlhopheng Money PAP appreciated the project and opted for monetary Ngwage Disturbance % 10,00 10,00 908,57 neighbor) compensation. Allowance TOTAL 13.602,30 34 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A10-1-AR2-B MOSHUPA-LOTHAKANE WEST 0-06-NEW Developed Cropland 35 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -36777,933 2743591,170 334598,260 7256564,480 378,58 B -36513,272 2743687,643 334350,610 7256464,150 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti TYPE - Money/Area m2 loss of right 378,58 0,80 302,86 fence m 271,00 62,00 16.802,00 Motshegetsi Kelobang & Face to face consultation with affected person. 71569321 & Trees u 3,00 194,33 583,00 Lenah Kelobang - Money The PAP appreciated the project and opted for 74278291 Disturbance % 100,00 10,00 1.768,79 (husban & wife) monetary compensation. Allowance TOTAL 19.456,65 36 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A10-1-AR2-B MOSHUPA-LOTHAKANE WE 0-07-NEW Developed Cropland 37 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -36715,850 2743591,232 334536,190 7256563,510 1365,5 B -36445,631 2743692,274 334267,500 7256458,530 Real COMPENSATION TYPE DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti - Money/Area loss of rightm2 1.365,50 0,80 1.092,40 fence m 294,67 62,00 18.269,54 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP Kekgabile Trees u 20,00 144,90 2.898,00 NA Money appreciated the project and opted for monetary Matshediso Disturbance % 100,00 10,00 2.225,99 compensation. Allowance TOTAL 24.485,93 38 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A10-1-AR2-B MOSHUPA-LOTHAKANE WEST 0-08-NEW Developed Cropland 39 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -36542,440 2743694,932 334264,330 7256457,290 628,36 B -36167,096 2743796,385 333990,540 7256350,360 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE TYPE - Money/Area COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti m2 loss of right 628,36 0,80 502,69 fence m 296,18 62,00 18.363,16 Face to face consultation with affected Motshegetsi Kelobang & Lenah 71569321 & Trees u 22,00 143,00 3.146,00 Kelobang - (husban & wife) - Money person. The PAP appreciated the project 74278291 Disturbance % 100,00 10,00 2.201,18 Keitsemang Thipe(Mmamarang) and opted for monetary compensation. Allowance TOTAL 24.213,03 40 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A10-1-AR2-B MOSHUPA-LOTHAKANE WEST 0-09-NEW Developed Cropland 41 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -34772,108 2744098,692 332600,230 7256027,680 132 B -34632,408 2744174,920 332461,670 7255949,420 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti TYPE - Money/Area m2 loss of right 132,00 0,80 105,60 fence m 159,34 62,00 9.879,08 Face to face consultation with affected person. The 71919257 / James Trees u 7,00 172,07 1.204,50 74515874 ACQUIRE Money PAP appreciated the project and opted for Goitsemodimo Disturbance % 100,00 10,00 1.118,92 (Kagiso-son) monetary compensation. Allowance TOTAL 12.308,10 42 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A10-1-AR2-B MOSHUPA-LOTHAKANE WEST 0-10-NEW Developed Cropland 43 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -34552,444 2744217,246 332382,340 7255905,930 420,49 B -34447,311 2744272,826 332278,040 7255848,820 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti TYPE - Money/Area m2 loss of right 420,49 0,80 336,39 fence m 123,08 62,00 7.630,96 Watshipi Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP Trees u 20,00 123,75 2.475,00 Rratsiripi & appreciated the project and opted for monetary 71483088 Money Disturbance Boitumelo compensation.Room for extention, But wanted to know if Allowance % 100,00 10,00 1.044,24 Ratsiripi clearing expenses will be accounted for as well. TOTAL 11.486,59 44 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A10-1-AR2-B MOSHUPA-LOTHAKANE WES 0-11-NEW Developed Cropland 45 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -33936,004 2744476,884 331769,810 7255637,310 315,63 B -33609,570 2744616,787 331445,480 7255492,650 º Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti TYPE - Money/Area m2 loss of right 315,63 0,80 252,50 fence m 358,16 62,00 22.205,92 Boitshoko Semathane - Face to face consultation with affected person. 71543497 & Alfred Semathane - Money The PAP appreciatted the project and optied for Trees u 3,00 110,00 330,00 74137137 Disturbance (Husband & Wife) monetary compensation. Allowance % 100,00 10,00 2.278,84 46 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN TOTAL 25.067,27 47 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN GENERAL LOCATION IMPACTS TO RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN BUILT UP AREAS 48 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description Developed Residential Plot - A10-1-AR1-C MOSHUPA 1-01 poverty eradication - chicken mashwire - to be affected 49 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -42761,779 2741701,004 340553,240 7258541,845 REFERENC -42749,570 2741698,670 340541,000 7258544,000 81,8 B -42741,828 2741692,231 340533,165 7258550,325 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE TYPE - Money/Area COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti loss of rightm2 81,80 12,50 1.022,50 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP fence m 23,42 Kalane 62,00 1.452,04 appreciatted the project. Will not let the project affect their plot 73276530 Family - Trees u 2,00 & ACQUIRE Money as proper consultions were not made and they have already made Mpho Kalane Disturbance % 100,00 10,00 247,45 & Siblings 72926735 petitions against the project passing by their plot at the Village Allowance Council, Landboard and the Kgotla. TOTAL 2.721,99 50 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description Developed Residential Plot - A10-1-AR1-C MOSHUPA 1-02 Screen wall 1.4m high in front of the yard to be affected 51 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -42769,620 2741686,586 340560,869 7258556,375 B -42797,349 2741700,697 340588,798 7258542,673 REFERENCE -42780,687 2741691,124 340572,000 7258552,000 87,15 C -42809,505 2741705,113 340601,016 7258538,435 D -42803,356 2741706,035 340594,882 7258537,424 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE TYPE - Money/Area COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti loss of rightm2 87,15 12,50 1.089,38 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP fence m 30,29 62,00 1.877,98 appreciatted the project. Will not let the project affect her property Disturbance Mrs as proper consultations were not made in the beginning and % 100,00 10,00 296,74 7273059 & Allowance Keeleditse ACQUIRE Money previous road project that passes behind her plot left her house in 5449293 TOTAL 3.264,09 Matshediso cracks which were not accounted for so wants the department of roads to handle her previous issue before continuing with this next project previous issue before continuing with this next project 52 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description Developed Commercial Plot - A10-1-AR2-A MOSHUPA 1-03 Salon, underground orange cables, 53 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -39783,140 2741677,024 337574,871 7258522,240 REFERENCE -39784,178 2741683,281 337576,000 7258516,000 8,57 B -39775,489 2741679,072 337567,251 7258520,081 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti TYPE - Money/Area loss of rightm2 8,57 12,50 107,13 Mr Letsebe Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP fence m 5,40 62,00 334,80 Mooketsi & Mrs appreciatted the project. Will not let the project affect their MORE Mmajane property as a lot of infrastructure could be affected- there is 71970392 CONSULTATION Money Trees u 1,00 165,00 165,00 Mooketsi - the leased orange Tower in the plot and the cables runs across NEEDED Disturbance % 100,00 10,00 60,89 (Husband & the existing gravelroad and other water pipes that pass Allowance Wife) through the plot TOTAL 667,52 54 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN 55 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description Developed Industrial Plot (Moshana Quarry) - New block of buildings at A2-5-AR1 MOSHANA 1-04 roof level to be affected & Screen wall 56 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -24257,948 2756342,635 322267,334 7243631,287 REFERENCE -24288,269 2756366,371 322298,000 7243608,000 69,5 B -24302,630 2756381,151 322312,576 7243593,433 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti TYPE - Money/Area m2 loss of right 12,50 868,75 69,50 fence m 61,49 62,00 3.812,38 Moshana Quarry - Mr Face to face consultation with affected person. Peter (business owner) - 71380989 & Trees u 0,00 0,00 0,00 SAVE Money The PAP appreciated the project and opted for Mr. Wang (property 72388888 Disturbance % 100,00 10,00 468,11 monetary compensation. Allowance owner) TOTAL 5.149,24 57 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A2-5-AR1 MOSHANA 1-05 Developed Residential Plot 58 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -24005,542 2756075,142 322011,025 7243895,035 REFERENCE -23999,458 2756079,088 322005,000 7243891,000 7,07 B -24004,334 2756081,690 322009,914 7243888,470 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti TYPE - Money/Area m2 loss of right 7,07 12,50 88,38 fence m 8,16 62,00505,92 Rabojalwa Molefe - Face to face consultation with affected person. 73029098 (Deceased ) -Ms Bushi Trees u 330,00 2,00 165,00 (Keletso Ratsie ACQUIRE Money The PAP appreciated the project, and opted for Molefe Sister (care Disturbance % 100,00 10,00 92,43 neighbor) monetary compensation. No space for extention Allowance taker) TOTAL 1.016,72 59 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A2-5-AR1 MOSHANA 1-06 Developed Residential Plot 60 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -24016,623 2755990,195 322020,856 7243980,134 B -24014,727 2755996,420 322019,052 7243973,882 87,52 REFERENCE -24012,486 2756009,271 322017,000 7243961,000 C -24014,705 2756015,577 322019,311 7243954,727 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti TYPE - Money/Area m2 loss of right 87,52 12,50 1.094,00 fence m 29,80 62,00 1.847,60 Face to face consultation with affected person. Keletso Ratsie & 73029098 & Trees u 1,00 165,00 165,00 Siblings - Flora Molosi 73907860 & ACQUIRE Money The PAP appreciated the project and opted for Disturbance % 100,00 10,00 310,66 - Koketso Kgosietsile 74444784 monetary compensation. Possible extension Allowance TOTAL 3.417,26 61 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A2-5-AR1 MOSHANA 1-07 Developed Residential Plot 62 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -24031,991 2755981,791 322036,098 7243988,763 REFERENCE -24035,844 2755985,111 322040,000 7243985.5 7,87 B -24031,020 2755987,615 322035,213 7243982,926 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti TYPE - Money/Area m2 loss of right 7,87 12,50 98,38 fence m 8,12 62,00 503,44 Kagiso Matlale & Face to face consultation with affected person. Stand Pipe 1.300,00 1,00 1.300,00 72196423 & Siblings - Kealeboga Trees u 4,00 198,00 792,00 76659053 & ACQUIRE Money The PAP appreciated the project, and opted for Moilwa - Mheteng Disturbance 72198338 monetary compensation. No space for extention. % 100,00 10,00 269,38 Mochudi Allowance TOTAL 2.963,20 63 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description Developed Residential Plot - A2-5-AR1 MOSHANA 1-08 Standpipe to be affected 64 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -24183,791 2755764,565 322184,685 7244208,194 REFERENCE -24172,957 2755774,601 322174,000 7244198,000 176,83 B -24159,111 2755793,874 322160,439 7244178,526 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti TYPE - Money/Area m2 loss of right 176,83 12,50 2.210,38 fence m 46,69 62,00 2.894,78 Keabetswe Kosie - Face to face consultation with affected person. The 74579040 - StandPipe u 1.300,00 1,00 1.300,00 Matshediso Kosie ACQUIRE Money PAP appreciated the project, and opted for monetary 71334510 Trees u 1,00 209,00 209,00 (Daughter) compensation. No space for extention Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 661,42 TOTAL 7.257,52 65 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A2-5-AR1 MOSHANA 1-09 Developed Residential Plot 66 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A 322173,389 7244342,667 REFERENCE 322169,000 7244339,000 126,5 B 322127,512 7244336,292 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti TYPE - Money/Area m2 loss of right 126,50 12,50 1.581,25 fence m 52,46 62,00 3.252,52 Ms Buang Maruma Face to face consultation with affected person. (Decesased) - Children: 74233530 - Trees u 1,00 209,00 209,00 ACQUIRE Money The PAP appreciated the project, and opted for Keatlametse Maruma & 74567090 Disturbance % 100,00 10,00 504,28 monetary compensation. No space for extention Allowance Shaleko E Maruma TOTAL 5.547,05 67 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A2-5-AR1 MOSHANA 1-08 A 68 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A REFERENCE B Real COMPENSATION TYPE - DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti Money/Area Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the ACQUIRE project. Not include in drawings and if acquired 4 shadow trees will be affected. 69 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description Undeveloped Plot within A2-5-AR1 MOSHANA 1-08 B Builtup area - Corner poles 70 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A REFERENCE B Real COMPENSATION TYPE - DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti Money/Area Owner Corner poles: CE must check if the road affectsthe the ACQUIRE Deceased yard adjacent to 1-08 71 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN 72 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A2-5-AR2 SELAKOLELA 1-10 Partly Developed Depot 73 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -11358,444 2760119,084 309424,611 7239665,354 REFERENCE -11380,501 2760141,764 309447,000 7239643,000 119,8 B -11397,373 2760143,335 309463,894 7239641,678 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti TYPE - Money/Area m2 loss of right 119,80 12,50 1.497,50 fence m 50,71 62,00 3.144,02 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP Depot - 73937012 & Trees u 0,00 0,00 0,00 Kgangetsile ACQUIRE Money appreciated the project, and opted for monetary 72939416 Disturbance % 100,00 10,00 464,15 Gotsilewame compensation. No space for extention Allowance TOTAL 5.105,67 74 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description Undeveloped Cropland- Plot A2-5-AR2 SELAKOLELA 1-11 not Developed within builtup area 75 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -11952,203 2760572,329 310025,008 7239220,882 REFERENCE -11954,976 2760587,253 310028,000 7239206,000 27,56 B -11951,119 2760594,804 310024,255 7239198,393 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti TYPE - Money/Area m2 loss of right 27,56 0,30 8,27 fence m 24,22 62,00 1.501,64 Face to face consultation with affected person. The Ms 76471593 & Trees u 0,00 0,00 0,00 Masego 73225071 Mr ACQUIRE Land extension PAP appreciated the project, and opted for land Disturbance % 100,00 10,00 150,99 Molefe Motlhajoe (neighbor) extension compensation. Allowance TOTAL 1.660,90 76 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A2-5-AR2 SELAKOLELA 1-12 Developed Residential Plot 77 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -11987,425 2760843,537 310064,222 7238950,211 REFERENCE -11999,815 2760869,932 310077,000 7238924,000 40,08 B -12004,275 2760894,692 310081,825 7238899,307 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti TYPE - Money/Area m2 loss of right 40,08 12,50 501,00 fence m 54,75 62,00 3.394,50 Face to face consultation with affected person. Ms Moroba Leero - 74954988 & Trees u 3,00 82,50 247,50 Boitshwarelo Moalosi - SAVE Money The PAP appreciated the project, and opted for 75895570 Disturbance % 100,00 10,00 414,30 (Granddaughter) monetary compensation. No space for extention Allowance TOTAL 4.557,30 78 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A2-5-AR2 SELAKOLELA 1-10 A GARONA LIQUOR 79 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A REFERENCE B Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti TYPE - Money/Area Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated GARONA the project. Consider the safety of the curve corner affected but not ACQUIRE LIQUOR captured by CE. Check if redesign of the curve will not save acquiring of this property. 80 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A2-5-AR2 SELAKOLELA 1-10 B 81 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A REFERENCE B DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMPENSATION TYPE - Money/Area COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT 82 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN 83 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A2-5-AR3 SESUNG 1-13 Developed Residential Plot 84 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -498,396 2753471,832 298467,143 7246152,617 REFERENCE -497,127 2753480,430 298466,000 7246144,000 29,01 B -492,496 2753486,591 298461,459 7246137,771 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti TYPE - Money/Area loss of right m2 29,01 12,50 362,63 fence m 19,35 62,00 1.199,70 toilet m2 23,40 2.500,00 58.500,00 VDC-Kgotla toilets - Mr Face to face consultation with affected person. 75893818 - Balemogeng Ramontsho ACQUIRE Money The PAP appreciated the project, and opted for Trees u 0,00 0,00 0,00 72456892 Disturbance VDC Secretary monetary compensation. Allowance % 100,00 10,00 6.006,23 TOTAL 66.068,56 85 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A2-5-AR3 SESUNG 1-20-NEW Undeveloped Cropland 86 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -2219,537 2750641,310 300146,690 7249008,390 2347,85 B -1867,734 2751208,532 299803,220 7248436,010 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti TYPE - Money/Area m2 loss of right 2347,85 0,30 704,36 fence m 669,06 62,00 41.481,72 71258576 & Face to face consultation with affected person. The Trees u 126 64,44 8.119,65 Keanolenyana 71746481 PAP appreciated the project, and opted for Money Disturbance Dinake (Morwesi Dinake- monetary compensation. Possible space for Allowance % 100,00 10,00 5.030,57 relative) extention TOTAL 55.336,30 87 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A2-5-AR3 SESUNG 1-21-NEW Undeveloped Cropland 88 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A -1523,063 2751725,837 299466,150 7247913,650 38,26 B -1494,223 2751770,744 299437,970 7247868,320 Real COMPENSATION TYPE DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti - Money/Area m2 loss of right 38,26 0,30 11,48 fence m 55,1 62,00 3.416,20 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP Onkemetse Trees u 15 99,00 1.485,00 71639000 Money appreciated the project, and opted for monetary Matsoge Disturbance % 100,00 10,00 491,27 compensation. Possible space for extention Allowance TOTAL 5.403,95 89 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN 90 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description Developed Residential Plot out A2-5-AR4 SESE 1-14 built up area 91 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A 18602,827 2727161,634 278980,146 7272184,482 REFERENCE 18615,020 2727164,938 278968,000 7272181,000 46,33 B 18624,951 2727175,324 278958,219 7272170,469 Real COMPENSATION TYPE - DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti Money/Area m2 loss of right 46,33 12,50 579,13 fence m 28,15 62,00 1.745,30 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP Mooketsi Trees u 1,00 209,00 209,00 74179268 ACQUIRE Money appreciated the project, and opted for monetary Keipeile Disturbance % 100,00 10,00 253,34 compensation. Allowance TOTAL 2.786,77 92 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A2-5-AR4 SESE 1-15 Developed Residential Plot 93 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A 19702,452 2727870,331 277890,741 7271459,697 REFERENCE 19697,971 2727855,095 277895,000 7271475,000 88,93 B 19666,922 2727793,894 277925,160 7271536,660 Real COMPENSATION TYPE DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti - Money/Area loss of rightm2 88,93 12,50 1.111,63 fence m 87,14 62,00 5.402,68 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP Kesegonyana 72816985 ACQUIRE Money appreciated the project, and opted for monetary Trees u 0,00 0,00 0,00 Rakodu Disturbance compensation. No space for extention Allowance % 100,00 10,00 651,43 TOTAL 7.165,74 94 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A2-5-AR4 SESE 1-16 Developed Residential Plot 95 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A 19821,596 2727924,243 277772,370 7271404,044 REFERENCE 19802,958 2727923,559 277791,000 7271405,000 78,3 B 19783,838 2727913,481 277809,975 7271415,357 Real COMPENSATION TYPE DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti - Money/Area m2 loss of right 78,30 12,50 978,75 fence m 42,94 62,00 2.662,28 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP Molefe Trees u 9,00 114,89 1.034,00 73559815 ACQUIRE Money appreciated the project, and opted for monetary Gabarongwe Disturbance % 100,00 10,00 467,50 compensation. No space for extension Allowance TOTAL 5.142,53 96 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A2-5-AR4 SESE 1-17 Developed Residential Plot 97 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A 19951,104 2728003,632 277644,006 7271322,760 REFERENCE 19962,205 2728010,230 277633,000 7271316,000 17,57 B 19971,903 2728005,680 277623,235 7271320,409 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti TYPE - Money/Area m2 loss of right 17,57 12,50 219,63 fence m 22,28 62,00 1.381,36 Temogo Rakodu (wife) - Face to face consultation with affected person. The Trees u 4,00 114,89 459,56 (owner-Johane Rakala) 73852370 & PAP appreciated the project, and opted for SAVE Money Disturbance 75870870 monetary compensation. There is possible extention Allowance % 100,00 10,00 206,05 - (Boitumelo- Daughter) at the back TOTAL 2.266,60 98 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A2-5-AR4 SESE 1-18 Developed Residential Plot 99 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A 20049,277 2728009,291 277545,906 7271315,670 REFERENCE 20053,162 2728007,905 277542,000 7271317,000 10,67 B 20056,964 2728011,796 277538,255 7271313,053 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti TYPE - Money/Area m2 loss of right 10,67 12,50 133,38 fence m 9,97 62,00 618,14 Stand Pipe u 1.300,00 1,00 1.300,00 Raeshemane Mokala Face to face consultation with affected person. The 72677865 - PAP appreciated the project, and opted for monetary Trees u 2,00 123,75 247,50 - (Emmanuel Mokala- 75142645 SAVE Money Disturbance Son) compensation. No space for extension Allowance % 100,00 10,00 229,90 TOTAL 2.528,92 100 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A2-5-AR4 SESE 1-19 Developed Residential Plot 101 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A 20101,402 2728026,024 277494,020 7271298,176 REFERENCE 20108,393 2728024,098 277487,000 7271300,000 7,71 B 20108,221 2728028,074 277487,230 7271296,026 Real COMPENSATION DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti TYPE - Money/Area m2 loss of right 7,71 12,50 96,38 fence m 9,00 62,00 558,00 Stand Pipe u 1.300,00 1,00 1.300,00 Kelebile & Oabona 74915828 - Face to face consultation with affected person. The Mpolokang - 74941729 - SAVE Money PAP appreciated the project, and opted for Trees u 0,00 0,00 0,00 Disturbance (Husband & Wife) 73932225 monetary compensation. No space for extention Allowance % 100,00 10,00 195,44 TOTAL 2.149,81 102 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A2-5-AR4 SESE 1-22-NEW Developed Cropland 103 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A 18522,847 2727132,574 279059,710 7272214,710 840,73 B 18749,186 2727275,344 278835,430 7272068,630 Real COMPENSATION TYPE DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti - Money/Area m2 loss of right 840,73 0,80 672,58 fence m 267,87 62,00 16.607,94 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP Mooketsi Trees u 60 133,38 8.002,50 74179268 Money appreciated the project, and opted for monetary Keipeile Disturbance % 100,00 10,00 2.528,30 compensation. No space for extension Allowance TOTAL 27.811,33 104 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN LOCATION CODE IDENTIFICATION Description A2-5-AR4 SESE 1-23-NEW Undeveloped Cropland 105 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN POINT LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM AREA A 18934,336 2727398,805 278652,061 7271942,460 35,35 B 18992,434 2727437,445 278594,520 7271902,970 Real COMPENSATION TYPE DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE COMMENTS/REMARKS FROM SITE VISIT Quantiti - Money/Area m2 loss of right 35,35 0,30 10,61 fence m 69,79 62,00 4.326,98 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP Mooketsi Trees u 33 92,50 3.052,50 74179268 Money appreciated the project, and opted for monetary compensation. Keipeile Disturbance % 10,00 10,00 739,01 No space for extention Allowance TOTAL 8.129,09 106 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN TABULATED DETAILS OF THE AFFECTED PROPERTIES : PACKAGE 1 107 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN 108 APPENDIX 1: AFFECTED ASSETS MAPPING OPRC PACKAGE 2: B101 RAKHUNA-TLHARESELEELE-PITSANE-PITSANE MOLOPO-MABULE ROAD RESETTLEMENT PLAN 109 arap PKG-1 TABULATED DETAILS OF THE AFFECTED PROPERTIES : PACKAGE 1 AFFECTED ASSETS LOCATION Old Serial New Serial Code Identification Real COMPENSATION TYPE Description DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Place Side Section LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE CONSULTATION No. No. number as per ARAP Quantiti - Money/Area 2 loss of right m 174.24 0.80 139.39 -37415.936 2743062.892 335228.410 7257101.999 fence m 65.00 62.00 4,030.00 -37386.015 2743097.460 335199.000 7257067.000 Phaki Sengwatse & Moshupa- Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 1 1 0-01 Developed Cropland Plot Trees u 22.00 137.23 3,019.00 LHS Section A10-1-AR2-B -37374.734 2743108.540 335187.884 7257055.757 Dikatso Moremi - 72822929 & 72520841 ACQUIRE Money Lothakane West project and opted for monetary compensation. Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 718.84 Siblings TOTAL 7,907.23 m2 loss of right 479.63 0.80 383.70 -37370.246 2743112.872 335183.460 7257051.360 fence m 135.00 62.00 8,370.00 Moshupa- -37266.090 2743191.902 335080.480 7256970.820 Sealo Gare (field owner) Kelebogile (Grand Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 2 0-04-NEW Developed Cropland Trees u 23.00 182.22 4,191.00 LHS Section A10-1-AR2-B - Keboabe Ntwaetsile Money Lothakane West daughter) - 71384183 project and opted for monetary compensation. Disturbance Allowance % 10.00 10.00 1,294.47 (Daughter) TOTAL 14,239.17 m2 loss of right 197.16 0.80 157.73 -36955.162 2743462.321 334773.570 7256695.900 fencem 144.00 62.00 8,928.00 Moshupa- -36843.609 2743553.345 334663.370 7256603.260 74572439 (Atlhopheng Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 3 0-05-NEW Developed Cropland Trees u 23.00 156.87 3,608.00 LHS Section A10-1-AR2-B Sebolenki Ngwage Money Lothakane West neighbor) project and opted for monetary compensation. Disturbance Allowance % 10.00 10.00 908.57 TOTAL 13,602.30 m2 loss of right 378.58 0.80 302.86 -36777.933 2743591.170 334598.260 7256564.480 fencem 271.00 62.00 16,802.00 Moshupa- -36513.272 2743687.643 3343350.610 7256464.150 Motshegetsi Kelobang & Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 4 0-06-NEW Developed Cropland Trees u 3.00 194.33 583.00 LHS Section A10-1-AR2-B Lenah Kelobang - 71569321 & 74278291 Money Lothakane West project and opted for monetary compensation. Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 1,768.79 (husban & wife) TOTAL 19,456.65 m2 loss of right 1,365.50 0.80 1,092.40 -36715.850 2743591.232 334536.190 7256563.510 fence m 294.67 62.00 18,269.54 Moshupa- -36445.631 2743692.274 334267.500 7256458.530 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 5 0-07-NEW Developed Cropland Trees u 20.00 144.90 2,898.00 RHS Section A10-1-AR2-B Kekgabile Matshediso NA Money Lothakane West project and opted for monetary compensation. Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 2,225.99 TOTAL 24,485.93 loss of right m2 628.36 0.80 502.69 -36542.440 2743694.932 334364.330 7256457.290 Motshegetsi Kelobang & fence m 296.18 62.00 18,363.16 -36167.096 2743796.385 333990.540 7256350.360 Lenah Kelobang - Moshupa- Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 6 0-08-NEW Developed Cropland Trees u 22.00 143.00 3,146.00 RHS Section A10-1-AR2-B (husban & wife) - 71569321 & 74278291 Money Lothakane West project and opted for monetary compensation. Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 2,201.18 Keitsemang TOTAL 24,213.03 Thipe(Mmamarang) m2 loss of right 1,545.24 0.80 1,236.19 -36048.086 2743855.433 333872.417 7256289.580 fencem 342.80 62.00 21,253.60 -35874.417 2743870.473 33699.000 7256272.000 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the Moshupa- Children: Keamogetse 2 7 0-02 Developed Cropland Plot Trees u 10.00 157.90 1,579.00 LHS Section A10-1-AR2-B -35712.710 2743881.465 333537.483 7256258.642 74572439/ 5448010 ACQUIRE Money project and opted for monetary compensation, hopes the Landboard Lothakane West Atlhopheng Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 2,406.88 cooperates well with them TOTAL 26,475.67 m2 loss of right 132.00 0.80 105.60 -35874.417 2743870.473 333699.000 7256272.000 fencem 159.34 62.00 9,879.08 Moshupa- -34772.108 2744098.692 332600.230 7256027.680 71919257 / 74515874 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 8 0-09-NEW Developed Cropland Plot Trees u 7.00 172.07 1,204.50 LHS Section A10-1-AR2-B -34632.408 2744174.920 332461.670 7255949.420 James Goitsemodimo ACQUIRE Money Lothakane West (Kagiso-son) project and opted for monetary compensation. Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 1,118.92 TOTAL 12,308.10 m2 loss of right 420.49 0.80 336.39 -34552.444 2744217.246 332382.340 7255905.930 fence m 123.08 62.00 7,630.96 -34447.311 2744272.826 332278.040 7255848.820 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the Moshupa- Watshipi Rratsiripi & 9 0-10-NEW Developed Cropland Trees u 20.00 123.75 2,475.00 LHS Section A10-1-AR2-B 71483088 Money project and opted for monetary compensation.Room for extention, But Lothakane West Boitumelo Ratsiripi Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 1,044.24 wanted to know if clearing expenses will be accounted for as well TOTAL 11,486.59 loss of right m2 265.85 0.80 212.68 -33829.716 2744550.379 331664.616 7255562.271 fence m 186.54 62.00 11,565.48 Moshupa- -33697.208 2744609.719 331533.000 7255501.000 72522575 or 72430212 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 3 10 0-03 Developed Cropland Plot Trees u 5.00 99.00 495.00 LHS Section A10-1-AR2-B -33660.056 2744624.183 331496.066 7255485.994 Magadi Moloi ACQUIRE Land Extension Lothakane West (husband) project and opted for land extension compensation. Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 1,227.32 TOTAL 13,500.48 m2 loss of right 315.63 0.80 252.50 -33936.004 2744476.884 331769.810 7255637.310 fencem 358.16 62.00 22,205.92 -33609.570 2744616.787 331445.480 7255492.650 Boitshoko Semathane - Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciatted Moshupa- 11 0-11-NEW Developed Cropland Trees u 3.00 110.00 330.00 LHS Section A10-1-AR2-B Alfred Semathane - 71543497 & 74137137 Money Lothakane West the project and optied for monetary compensation. Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 2,278.84 (Husband & Wife) TOTAL 25,067.27 m2 loss of right 2,071.23 0.80 1,656.98 -37370.246 2743112.872 337592.160 7257670.218 fencem 417.89 62.00 25,909.37 -37266.090 2743191.902 335794.959 7257666.033 Moshupa- 11_1 0-12-NEW Developed Cropland Trees u 0.00 110.00 0.00 LHS Section A10-1-AR2-B -37374.095 2743052.750 336105.770 7257930.784 Lothakane West Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 2,756.64 -37375.850 2743024.120 336108.585 7257926.761 TOTAL 30,322.99 loss of right m2 81.80 12.50 1,022.50 -42761.779 2741701.004 340553.240 7258541.845 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciatted Developed Residential Plot - poverty fence m 23.42 62.00 1,452.04 -42749.570 2741698.670 340541.000 7258544.000 the project. Will not let the project affect their plot as proper Kalane Family - Mpho 4 12 ´1-01 eradication - chicken mashwire - to be Trees u 2.00 110.00 220.00 Moshupa RHS Section A10-1-AR1-C -42741.828 2741692.231 340533.165 7258550.325 73276530 & 72926735 ACQUIRE No money or land consultions were not made and they have already made petitions Kalane & Siblings affected Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 247.45 against the project passing by their plot at the Village Council, TOTAL 2,941.99 Landboard and the Kgotla. loss of right m2 87.15 12.50 1,089.38 -42769.620 2741686.586 340560.869 7258556.375 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciatted fence m 30.29 62.00 1,877.98 -42797.349 2741700.697 340588.798 7258542.673 the project. Will not let the project affect her property as proper Developed Residential Plot - Screen Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 296.74 -42780.687 2741691.124 340572.000 7258552.000 Mrs Keeleditse consultations were not made in the beginning and previous road project 5 13 ´1-02 wall 1.4m high in front of the yard to be TOTAL 3,264.09 Moshupa LHS Section A10-1-AR1-C -42809.505 2741705.113 340601.016 7258538.435 7273059 & 5449293 ACQUIRE No money or land Matshediso that passes behind her plot left her house in cracks which were not affected accounted for so wants the department of roads to handle her previous -42803.356 2741706.035 340594.882 7258537.424 issue before continuing with this next project loss of rightm2 8.57 12.50 107.13 -39783.140 2741677.024 337574.871 7258522.240 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciatted fence m 5.40 62.00 334.80 -39784.178 2741683.281 337576.000 7258516.000 No money or land - Mr Letsebe Mooketsi & MORE the project. Will not let the project affect their property as a lot of Developed Commercial Plot - Salon, Trees u 1.00 165.00 165.00 -39775.489 2741679.072 337567.251 7258520.081 Don’t want their - 6 14 ´1-03 Moshupa LHS Section A10-1-AR2-A Mrs Mmajane Mooketsi - 71970392 CONSULTATION infrastructure could be affected- there is the leased orange Tower in the underground orange cables, Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 60.69 property to be (Husband & Wife) NEEDED plot and the cables runs across the existing gravelroad and other water TOTAL 667.62 affected pipes that pass through the plot loss of right m2 69.50 12.50 868.75 -24257.948 2756342.635 322267.334 7243631.287 Moshana Quarry - Mr Developed Industrial Plot (Moshana fence m 61.49 62.00 3,812.38 -24288.269 2756366.371 322298.000 7243608.000 Peter (business owner) - Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 7 15 ´1-04 Quarry) - New block of buildings at roof Trees u 0.00 0.00 0.00 Moshana RHS Section A2-5-AR1 -24302.630 2756381.151 322312.576 7243593.433 71380989 & 72388888 SAVE Money Mr. Wang (property project and opted for monetary compensation. level to be affected & Screen wall Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 468.11 owner) TOTAL 5,149.24 loss of right m2 7.07 12.50 88.38 -24005.542 2756075.142 322011.025 7243895.035 Rabojalwa Molefe - fence m 8.16 62.00 505.92 -23999.458 2756079.088 322005.000 7243891.000 (Deceased ) -Ms Bushi 73029098 (Keletso Ratsie Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 8 16 ´1-05 Developed Residential Plot Trees u 2.00 165.00 330.00 Moshana LHS Section A2-5-AR1 -24004.334 2756081.690 322009.914 7243888.470 ACQUIRE Money Molefe Sister (care neighbor) project, and opted for monetary compensation. No space for extention Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 92.43 taker) TOTAL 1,016.72 loss of right m2 87.52 12.50 1,094.00 -24016.623 2755990.195 322020.856 7243980.134 fence m 29.80 62.00 1,847.60 -24014.727 2755996.420 322019.052 7243973.882 Keletso Ratsie & 73029098 & 73907860 & Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 9 17 ´1-06 Developed Residential Plot Trees u 1.00 165.00 165.00 Moshana LHS Section A2-5-AR1 -24012.486 2756009.271 322017.000 7243961.000 Siblings - Flora Molosi - ACQUIRE Money 74444784 project and opted for monetary compensation. Possible extension Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 310.66 -24014.705 2756015.577 322019.311 7243954.727 Koketso Kgosietsile TOTAL 3,417.26 loss of right m2 7.87 12.50 98.38 -24031.991 2755981.791 322036.098 7243988.763 fence m 8.12 62.00 503.44 -24035.844 2755985.111 322040.000 7243985.5 Kagiso Matlale & Stand Pipe 1,300.00 1.00 1,300.00 -24031.020 2755987.615 322035.213 7243982.926 Siblings - Kealeboga 72196423 & 76659053 & Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 10 18 ´1-07 Developed Residential Plot Moshana RHS Section A2-5-AR1 ACQUIRE Money Trees u 4.00 198.00 792.00 Moilwa - Mheteng 72198338 project, and opted for monetary compensation. No space for extention M h di 6/6/2018 1 to 2 arap PKG-1 TABULATED DETAILS OF THE AFFECTED PROPERTIES : PACKAGE 1 AFFECTED ASSETS LOCATION Old Serial New Serial Code Identification Real COMPENSATION TYPE Description DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Place Side Section LO25_Y LO25_X X_UTM Y_UTM Owner Contacts ACQUIRE/SAVE CONSULTATION No. No. number as per ARAP Quantiti - Money/Area Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 269.38 Mochudi TOTAL 2,963.20 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 19 1-08A Moshana LHS Section A2-5-AR1 ACQUIRE project. Not include in drawings and if acquired 4 shadow trees will be affected. m2 loss of right 176.83 12.50 2,210.38 -24183.791 2755764.565 322184.685 7244208.194 fence m 46.69 62.00 2,894.78 -24172.957 2755774.601 322174.000 7244198.000 Keabetswe Kosie - Developed Residential Plot - Standpipe StandPipe u 1,300.00 1.00 1,300.00 -24159.111 2755793.874 322160.439 7244178.526 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 11 20 ´1-08 Moshana LHS Section A2-5-AR1 Matshediso Kosie 74579040 - 71334510 ACQUIRE Money to be affected Trees u 1.00 209.00 209.00 project, and opted for monetary compensation. No space for extention (Daughter) Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 661.42 TOTAL 7,275.57 Undeveloped Plot within Builtup area - Corner poles: CE must check if the road affectsthe the yard adjacent to 21 1-08B Moshana LHS Section A2-5-AR1 Owner Deceased ACQUIRE Corner poles 1-08 loss of rightm2 126.50 12.50 1,581.25 -24174.473 2755629.938 322173.389 7244342.667 Ms Buang Maruma fence m 52.46 62.00 3,252.52 -24170.030 2755633.540 322169.000 7244339.000 (Decesased) - Children: Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 12 22 ´1-09 Developed Residential Plot Trees u 1.00 209.00 209.00 Moshana LHS Section A2-5-AR1 -24128.506 2755635.638 322127.512 7244336.292 Keatlametse Maruma & 74233530 - 74567090 ACQUIRE Money project, and opted for monetary compensation. No space for extention Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 504.28 Shaleko E Maruma TOTAL 5,547.05 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the project. Consider the safety of the curve corner affected but not 23 1-10A GARONA LIQUOR Selokela RHS Section A2-5-AR2 GARONA LIQUOR ACQUIRE captured by CE. Check if redesign of the curve will not save acquiring of this property. 24 1-10B Selokela LHS Section A2-5-AR2 m2 loss of right 119.80 12.50 1,497.50 -11358.444 2760119.084 309424.611 7239665.354 fencem 50.71 62.00 3,144.02 -11380.501 2760141.764 309447.000 7239643.000 Depot - Kgangetsile Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 13 25 ´1-10 Partly Developed Depot Trees u 0.00 0.00 0.00 Selokela RHS Section A2-5-AR2 -11397.373 2760143.335 309463.894 7239641.678 73937012 & 72939416 ACQUIRE Money Gotsilewame project, and opted for monetary compensation. No space for extention Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 464.15 TOTAL 5,105.67 m2 loss of right 27.56 0.30 8.27 -11952.203 2760572.329 310025.008 7239220.882 Undeveloped Cropland- Plot not fence m 24.22 62.00 1,501.64 -11954.976 2760587.253 310028.000 7239206.000 76471593 & 73225071 Mr Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 14 26 ´1-11 Trees u 0.00 0.00 0.00 Selokela LHS Section A2-5-AR2 -11951.119 2760594.804 310024.255 7239198.393 Ms Masego Molefe ACQUIRE Land extension Developed within builtup area Motlhajoe (neighbor) project, and opted for land extension compensation. Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 150.99 TOTAL 1,660.90 m2 loss of right 40.08 12.50 501.00 -11987.425 2760843.537 310064.222 7238950.211 fence m 54.75 62.00 3,394.50 -11999.815 2760869.932 310077.000 7238924.000 Ms Moroba Leero - Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 15 27 ´1-12 Developed Residential Plot Trees u 3.00 82.50 247.50 Selokela LHS Section A2-5-AR2 -12004.275 2760894.692 310081.825 7238899.307 Boitshwarelo Moalosi - 74954988 & 75895570 SAVE Money project, and opted for monetary compensation. No space for extention Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 414.30 (Granddaughter) TOTAL 4,557.30 loss of right m2 29.01 12.50 362.63 -498.396 2753471.832 298467.143 7246152.617 fence m 19.35 62.00 1,199.70 -497.127 2753480.430 298466.000 7246144.000 VDC-Kgotla toilets - Mr toilet m2 23.40 2,500.00 58,500.00 -492.496 2753486.591 298461.459 7246137.771 Balemogeng Ramontsho Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 16 28 ´1-13 Developed Residential Plot Sesung LHS Section A2-5-AR3 75893818 - 72456892 ACQUIRE Money Trees u 0.00 0.00 0.00 project, and opted for monetary compensation. VDC Secretary Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 6,006.23 TOTAL 66,068.56 m2 loss of right 2347.85 0.30 704.36 -2219.537 2750641.310 300146.690 7249008.390 fencem 669.06 62.00 41,481.72 -1867.734 2751208.532 299803.220 7248436.010 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 71258576 & 71746481 29 1-20-NEW Undeveloped Cropland Trees u 126 64.44 8,119.65 Sesung LHS Section A2-5-AR3 Keanolenyana Dinake Money project, and opted for monetary compensation. Possible space for (Morwesi Dinake-relative) Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 5,030.57 extention TOTAL 55,336.30 m2 loss of right 38.26 0.30 11.48 -1523.063 2751725.837 299466.150 7247913.650 fence m 55.1 62.00 3,416.20 -1494.223 2751770.744 299437.970 7247868.320 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 30 1-21-NEW Undeveloped Cropland Trees u 15 99.00 1,485.00 Sesung LHS Section A2-5-AR3 Onkemetse Matsoge 71639000 Money project, and opted for monetary compensation. Possible space for Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 491.27 extention TOTAL 5,403.95 m2 loss of right 46.33 12.50 579.13 18602.827 2727161.634 278980.146 7272184.482 Developed Residential Plot out built up fencem 28.15 62.00 1,745.30 18615.020 2727164.938 278968.000 7272181.000 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 17 31 ´1-14 Trees u 1.00 209.00 209.00 Sese RHS Section A2-5-AR4 18624.951 2727175.324 278958.219 7272170.469 Mooketsi Keipeile 74179268 ACQUIRE Money area project, and opted for monetary compensation. Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 253.34 TOTAL 2,786.77 loss of right m2 88.93 12.50 1,111.63 19702.452 2727870.331 277890.741 7271459.697 fence m 87.14 62.00 5,402.68 19697.971 2727855.095 277895.000 7271475.000 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 18 32 ´1-15 Developed Residential Plot Trees u 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sese RHS Section A2-5-AR4 19666.922 2727793.894 277925.160 7271536.660 Kesegonyana Rakodu 72816985 ACQUIRE Money project, and opted for monetary compensation. No space for extention Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 651.43 TOTAL 7,165.74 loss of right m2 78.30 12.50 978.75 19821.596 2727924.243 277772.370 7271404.044 fence m 42.94 62.00 2,662.28 19802.958 2727923.559 277791.000 7271405.000 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 19 33 ´1-16 Developed Residential Plot Trees u 9.00 114.89 1,034.00 Sese LHS Section A2-5-AR4 19783.838 2727913.481 277809.975 7271415.357 Molefe Gabarongwe 73559815 ACQUIRE Money project, and opted for monetary compensation. No space for extension Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 467.50 TOTAL 5,142.53 loss of right m2 17.57 12.50 219.63 19951.104 2728003.632 277644.006 7271322.760 fence m 22.28 62.00 1,381.36 19962.205 2728010.230 277633.000 7271316.000 Temogo Rakodu (wife) - Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 20 34 ´1-17 Developed Residential Plot Trees u 4.00 114.89 459.56 Sese LHS Section A2-5-AR4 19971.903 2728005.680 277623.235 7271320.409 (owner-Johane Rakala) - 73852370 & 75870870 SAVE Money project, and opted for monetary compensation. There is possible Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 206.05 (Boitumelo- Daughter) extention at the back TOTAL 2,266.60 loss of right m2 10.67 12.50 133.38 20049.277 2728009.291 277545.906 7271315.670 fence m 9.97 62.00 618.14 20053.162 2728007.905 277542.000 7271317.000 Raeshemane Mokala - Stand Pipe u 1,300.00 1.00 1,300.00 20056.964 2728011.796 277538.255 7271313.053 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 21 35 ´1-18 Developed Residential Plot Sese RHS Section A2-5-AR4 (Emmanuel Mokala- 72677865 - 75142645 SAVE Money Trees u 2.00 123.75 247.50 project, and opted for monetary compensation. No space for extension Son) Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 229.90 TOTAL 2,528.92 loss of right m2 7.71 12.50 96.38 20101.402 2728026.024 277494.020 7271298.176 fence m 9.00 62.00 558.00 20108.393 2728024.098 277487.000 7271300.000 Kelebile & Oabona Stand Pipe u 1,300.00 1.00 1,300.00 20108.221 2728028.074 277487.230 7271296.026 Mpolokang - (Husband & 74915828 - 74941729 - Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 22 36 ´1-19 Developed Residential Plot Sese RHS Section A2-5-AR4 SAVE Money Trees u 0.00 0.00 0.00 73932225 project, and opted for monetary compensation. No space for extention Wife) Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 195.44 TOTAL 2,149.81 loss of right m2 840.73 0.80 672.58 18522.847 2727132.574 279059.710 7272214.710 fence m 267.87 62.00 16,607.94 18749.186 2727275.344 278835.430 7272068.630 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 37 1-22-NEW Developed Cropland Trees u 60 133.38 8,002.50 Sese LHS Section A2-5-AR4 Mooketsi Keipeile 74179268 Money project, and opted for monetary compensation. No space for extension Disturbance Allowance % 100.00 10.00 2,528.30 TOTAL 27,811.33 loss of right m2 35.35 0.30 10.61 18934.336 2727398.805 278652.061 7271942.460 fence m 69.79 62.00 4,326.98 18992.434 2727437.445 278594.520 7271902.970 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the 38 1-23-NEW Undeveloped Cropland Trees u 33 92.50 3,052.50 Sese LHS Section A2-5-AR4 Mooketsi Keipeile 74179268 Money project, and opted for monetary compensation. No space for extention Disturbance Allowance % 10.00 10.00 739.01 TOTAL 8,129.09 TOTAL 401,641.97 6/6/2018 2 to 2 OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Location: A10-1-AR2-B Code Identification 0-01 Questionnaire: MOSHUPA-LOTHAKANE WEST Owner: Phaki Sengwatse & Dikatso Moremi Coordinates X: 35199,000 Y: 7257067,000 - Siblings Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 174,24 0,80 139,39 fence m 65,00 62,00 4.030,00 Trees u 22,00 137,23 3.019,00 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 718,84 TOTAL 7.907,23 1 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 2 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Name Phaki Sengwatse Dikatso Moremi Relationship to HH Siblings Siblings Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of refrigerators 0 Total number of beds 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 65 Total number of trees 22 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The Comment PAP appreciated the project and opted for monetary compensation. 3 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Location: A10-1-AR2-B Code Identification 0-02 Questionnaire: MOSHUPA-LOTHAKANE WEST Coordinates X: 33699,000 Y: 7256272,000 Owner: Children: Keamogetse Atlhopheng Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 1.545,24 0,80 1.236,19 fence m 342,80 62,00 21.253,60 Trees u 10,00 157,90 1.579,00 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 2.406,88 TOTAL 26.475,67 4 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 5 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Keamogetse Name Atlhopheng Relationship to HH Children Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of beds 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 342.80 Total number of trees 10 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the project and opted for Comment monetary compensation.Room for extention, hopes the Landboard cooperates with them 6 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Location: A10-1-AR2-B Code Identification 0-03 Questionnaire: MOSHUPA-LOTHAKANE WEST Coordinates X:331533,000 Y: 7255501,000 Owner: Magadi Moloi Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 265,85 0,80 212,68 fence m 186,54 62,00 11.565,48 Trees u 5,00 99,00 495,00 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 1.227,32 TOTAL 13.500,48 7 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 8 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Name Magadi Moloi Relationship to HH Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of beds 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 186.54 Total number of trees 5 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The Comment PAP appreciated the project and opted for land extension compensation. 9 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification Location: A10-1-AR2-B Questionnaire: 0-04-NEW MOSHUPA-LOTHAKANE WEST Coordinates X: 335183,46 Y: 7257051,360 Owner: Sealo Gare (field owner) X: 335080,48 Y: 7256970,820 Keboabe Ntwaetsile (Daughter) Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 479,63 0,80 383,70 fence m 135,00 62,00 8.370,00 Trees u 23,00 182,22 4.191,00 Disturbance Allowance % 10,00 10,00 1.294,47 TOTAL 14.239,17 10 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 11 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Keboabe Name Sealo Gare Ntwaetsile Relationship to HH field owner Daughter Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of beds 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 135 Total number of trees 23 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The Comment PAP appreciated the project and opted for monetary compensation. 12 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification Location: A10-1-AR2-B MOSHUPA- Questionnaire: 0-05-NEW LOTHAKANE WEST X: 334773,57 Y: 7256695.90 Coordinates Owner: Sebolenki Ngwage X: 334663,37 Y: 7256603,260 Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 197,16 0,80 157,73 fence m 144,00 62,00 8.928,00 Trees u 23,00 156,87 3.608,00 Disturbance Allowance % 10,00 10,00 908,57 TOTAL 13.602,30 13 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 14 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Name Sebolenki Ngwage Relationship to HH Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of beds 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 144 Total number of trees 23 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The Comment PAP appreciated the project and opted for monetary compensation. 15 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification Location: A10-1-AR2-B MOSHUPA- Questionnaire: 0-06-NEW LOTHAKANE WEST X: 334598,26 Y: 7256564,48 Owner:Motshegetsi Kelobang & Lenah Coordinates X: 334350,61 Y: 7256464,15 Kelobang - (husban & wife) Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 378,58 0,80 302,86 fence m 271,00 62,00 16.802,00 Trees u 3,00 194,33 583,00 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 1.768,79 TOTAL 19.456,65 16 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 17 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Motshegetsi Name Kelobang Lenah Kelobang Relationship to HH husban wife Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of beds 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 271 Total number of trees 3 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The Comment PAP appreciated the project and opted for monetary compensation. 18 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification Location: A10-1-AR2-B MOSHUPA- Questionnaire: 0-07-NEW LOTHAKANE WEST X: 334536,19 Y: 7256563,510 Coordinates Owner: Kekgabile Matshediso X: 334267,50 Y: 7256458,530 Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 1.365,50 0,80 1.092,40 fence m 294,67 62,00 18.269,54 Trees u 20,00 144,90 2.898,00 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 2.225,99 TOTAL 24.485,93 19 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 20 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Kekgabile Name Matshediso Relationship to HH Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of beds 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 294.67 Total number of trees 20 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The Comment PAP appreciated the project and opted for monetary compensation. 21 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification Location: A10-1-AR2-B MOSHUPA- Questionnaire: 0-08-NEW LOTHAKANE WEST X: 334264,33 Y: 7256457,290 Owner: Motshegetsi Kelobang & Lenah Coordinates Kelobang - (husban & wife) - Keitsemang X: 333990,54 Y: 7256350,360 Thipe(Mmamarang) Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 628,36 0,80 502,69 fence m 296,18 62,00 18.363,16 Trees u 22,00 143,00 3.146,00 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 2.201,18 TOTAL 24.213,03 22 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 23 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Motshegetsi Name Kelobang Lenah Kelobang Keitsemang Thipe Relationship to HH husban wife Mmamarang Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of beds 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 296.18 Total number of trees 22 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The Comment PAP appreciated the project and opted for monetary compensation. 24 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification Location: A10-1-AR2-B MOSHUPA- Questionnaire: 0-09-NEW LOTHAKANE WEST X: 332600,23 Y: 7256027,680 Coordinates Owner: James Goitsemodimo X: 332461,67 Y: 7255949,420 Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 132,00 0,80 105,60 fence m 159,34 62,00 9.879,08 Trees u 7,00 172,07 1.204,50 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 1.118,92 TOTAL 12.308,10 25 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 26 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 James Name Goitsemodimo Relationship to HH Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of beds 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 159.34 Total number of trees 7 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The Comment PAP appreciated the project and opted for monetary compensation. 27 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification Location: A10-1-AR2-B MOSHUPA- Questionnaire: 0-10-NEW LOTHAKANE WEST X: 332382,34 Y: 7255905,930 Owner: Watshipi Rratsiripi & Boitumelo Coordinates X: 332278,04 Y: 7255848,820 Ratsiripi Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 420,49 0,80 336,39 fence m 123,08 62,00 7.630,96 Trees u 20,00 123,75 2.475,00 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 1.044,24 TOTAL 11.486,59 28 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 29 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Name Watshipi Rratsiripi Boitumelo Ratsiripi Relationship to HH Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 123.08 Total number of trees 20 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the Comment project and opted for monetary compensation. Room for extension, but 30 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN wanted to know if clearing expenses will be accounted for as well. Code Identification Location: A10-1-AR2-B MOSHUPA- Questionnaire: 0-11-NEW LOTHAKANE WEST X: 331769,81 Y: 7255637,310 Owner:Boitshoko Semathane - Alfred Coordinates X: 331445,48 Y: 7255492,650 Semathane - (Husband & Wife) Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 315,63 0,80 252,50 fence m 358,16 62,00 22.205,92 Trees u 3,00 110,00 330,00 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 2.278,84 TOTAL 25.067,27 31 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 32 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Boitshoko Name Semathane Alfred Semathane Relationship to HH Wife Husband Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of beds 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 358.16 Total number of trees 3 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The Comment PAP appreciated the project and opted for monetary compensation 33 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification Location: A10-1-AR1-C MOSHUPA Questionnaire: 1-01 Owner: Kalane Family - Mpho Kalane & Coordinates X: 340541,00 Y: 7258544,00 Siblings Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 81,80 12,50 1.022,50 fence m 23,42 62,00 1.452,04 Trees u 2,00 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 247,45 TOTAL 2.721,99 34 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 35 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Name Kalane Family Mpho Kalane & Siblings Relationship to HH Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 otal number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 23.42 Total number of trees 2 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the project Will not let the project affect their plot Comment as proper consultations were not made and they have already made petitions against the project passing by their plot at the Village Council, Land board and the Kgotla. 36 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN ode Identification Location: A10-1-AR1-C MOSHUPA Questionnaire: 1-02 Coordinates X: 340572,00 Y: 7258552,000 Owner: Mrs Keeleditse Matshediso Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 87,15 12,50 1.089,38 fence m 30,29 62,00 1.877,98 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 296,74 TOTAL 3.264,09 37 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 38 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Mrs Keeleditse Name Matshediso Relationship to HH Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 30.29 Total number of trees 0 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the project Will not let the project affect her property as proper consultations were not made in the beginning Comment and previous road project that passes behind her plot left her house in cracks which were not accounted for so wants the department of roads to handle her previous issue before continuing with this next project 39 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification Location: A10-1-AR2-A MOSHUPA Questionnaire: 1-03 Owner:Mr Letsebe Mooketsi & Mrs Coordinates X: 337576,00 Y: 7258516,000 Mmajane Mooketsi - (Husband & Wife) Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 8,57 12,50 107,13 fence m 5,40 62,00 334,80 Trees u 1,00 165,00 165,00 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 60,69 TOTAL 667,62 40 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 41 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Mrs Mmajane Name Mr Letsebe Mooketsi Mooketsi Relationship to HH Husband Wife Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 5.4 Total number of trees 1 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the project. Will not let the project affect their Comment property as a lot of infrastructure could be affected- there is the leased orange Tower in the plot and the cables runs across the existing gravelroad and other water pipes that pass 42 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN through the plot Code Identification Location: A2-5-AR1 MOSHANA Questionnaire: 1-04 Owner: Moshana Quarry - Mr Peter Coordinates X: 322298,00 Y: 7243608,000 (business owner) - Mr. Wang (property owner) Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 69,50 12,50 868,75 fence m 61,49 62,00 3.812,38 Trees u 0,00 0,00 0,00 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 468,11 TOTAL 5.149,24 43 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 44 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Name Moshana Quarry Mr Peter Mr. Wang Relationship to HH business owner property owner Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of beds 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 61.49 Total number of trees 0 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The Comment PAP appreciated the project and opted for monetary compensation 45 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification: 1-05 Location: A2-5-AR1-Moshana Questionnaire: Owner: Rabojalwa Molefe - (Deceased ) - Coordinates X: 322005,00 Y: 7243891,00 Ms Bushi Molefe Sister (care taker) Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 7,07 12,50 88,38 fence m 8,16 62,00 505,92 Trees u 2,00 165,00 330,00 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 92,43 TOTAL 1.016,72 46 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN 47 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Rabojalwa Ms Bushi Name Keletso Ratsie Bopaganang Ratsie Tatlo Ratsie Molefe - Molefe Relationship to HH Household head Child Child Deceased Sister Sex Female Male Male Age 29 8 2 Education High Lower primary None Still in School No Yes No Formal employment Not in labour Not in labour Current Employment Status (job) market market Continuously Ill for more No No No then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? No Main source of lighting for this household Paraffin Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Firewood Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? No Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. None government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household None because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there None was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use Public tap/standpipe If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute None Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 1 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 8.16 Total number of trees 2 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the Comment project and opted for monetary compensation . No space for extension. 48 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Happy with road Code Identification: 1-06 Location: A2-5-AR1-Moshana Questionnaire: RAP – Q19 Owner: Keletso Ratsie & Siblings - Flora Molosi - Koketso Coordinates X: 322017,00 Y: 7243961,00 Kgosietsile Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 87,52 12,50 1.094,00 fence m 29,80 62,00 1.847,60 Trees u 1,00 165,00 165,00 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 310,66 TOTAL 3.417,26 49 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN 50 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Koketso Name Kagiso Matlalae Keletso Ratsie Flora Molosi Kgosietsile Relationship to HH Household head Siblings Siblings Sex Male Age 44 Education Upper primary Still in School No Not in labour Current Employment Status market Continuously Ill for more Yes then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? No Main source of lighting for this household Candles Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Firewood Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? No Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. None government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household 2 because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there 2 was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use Tap in yard (own) If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Public tap/standpipe Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of refrigerators 0 Total number of beds 0 Total number of houses 3 Total number of toilets 1 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 1 Total number of trees 0 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the Comment project and opted for monetary compensation . Possible extension. Happy with road 51 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification 1-07 Location: A2-5-AR1 MOSHANA Questionnaire: Owner: Kagiso Matlale & Siblings - Kealeboga Moilwa - Coordinates X: 322040,00 Y: 7243985.5 Mheteng Mochudi Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 7,87 12,50 98,38 fence m 8,12 62,00 503,44 Stand Pipe 1.300,00 1,00 1.300,00 Trees u 4,00 198,00 792,00 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 269,38 TOTAL 2.963,20 52 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 53 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Name Kagiso Matlale Kealeboga Moilwa Mheteng Mochudi Relationship to HH Sibling Sibling Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 8.12 Total number of trees 4 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the Comment project and opted for monetary compensation. No space for extension. 54 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification: 1-08 Location: A2-5-AR1-Moshana Questionnaire: RAP – Q22 Coordinates X: 322174,00 Y: 7244198,000 Owner: Keabetswe Kosie - Matshediso Kosie (Daughter) Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 176,83 12,50 2.210,38 fence m 46,69 62,00 2.894,78 StandPipe u 1.300,00 1,00 1.300,00 Trees u 1,00 209,00 209,00 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 661,42 TOTAL 7.275,57 55 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 56 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Member 4 Member 5 Keabetswe Matshediso Name Kosie Kosie Relationship to HH Daughter Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 46.69 Total number of trees 1 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the Comment project and opted for monetary compensation. No space for extension. 57 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification Location: A2-5-AR1 MOSHANA Questionnaire: 1-09 Owner: Ms Buang Maruma (Decesased) - Children: Coordinates X: 322169,00 Y: 7244339,00 Keatlametse Maruma & Shaleko E Maruma Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 126,50 12,50 1.581,25 fence m 52,46 62,00 3.252,52 Trees u 1,00 209,00 209,00 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 504,28 TOTAL 5.547,05 58 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 59 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Keatlametse Name Ms Buang Maruma Maruma Shaleko E Maruma Relationship to HH Decesased Children Children Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 52.46 Total number of trees 1 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the Comment project and opted for monetary compensation. No space for extension. 60 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification Location: A2-5-AR1 MOSHANA Questionnaire: 1-08 A X: Y: Coordinates Owner: X: Y: Affected Not include in drawings and if acquired 4 shadow trees will be affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount 61 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 62 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Name Relationship to HH Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 0 Total number of trees 0 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the Comment project . Not include in drawings and if required 4 shadow trees will be affected. 63 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification1-08 B Location: A2-5-AR1 MOSHANA Questionnaire: Coordinates X: Y: Owner: Owner Deceased Affected: Corner poles: CE must check if the road affects The yard adjacent to 1-08 DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount 64 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Member 4 Owner Name Deceased Relationship to HH Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 0 Total number of trees 0 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the project and opted for Comment monetary compensation. Corner poles: CE must check if the road affectsthe the yard adjacent to 1-08. 65 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification 1-10 Location: A2-5-AR2 SELAKOLELA Questionnaire: Coordinates X: 309447,00 Y: 7239643,000 Owner: Depot - Kgangetsile Gotsilewame Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 119,80 12,50 1.497,50 fence m 50,71 62,00 3.144,02 Trees u 0,00 0,00 0,00 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 464,15 TOTAL 5.105,67 66 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 67 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Depot - Kgangetsile Name Gotsilewame Relationship to HH Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 50.71 Total number of trees 0 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the Comment project and opted for monetary compensation. No space for extension. 68 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification1-11 Location: A2-5-AR2 SELAKOLELA Questionnaire: Coordinates X: 310028,00 Y: 7239206,000 Owner: Ms Masego Molefe Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 27,56 0,30 8,27 fence m 24,22 62,00 1.501,64 Trees u 0,00 0,00 0,00 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 150,99 TOTAL 1.660,90 69 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 70 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Name Ms Masego Molefe Relationship to HH Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 24.22 Total number of trees 0 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The Comment PAP appreciated the project and opted for land extension compensation 71 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification 1-12 Location: A2-5-AR2 SELAKOLELA Questionnaire: Owner: Ms Moroba Leero - Boitshwarelo Moalosi - Coordinates X: 310077,00 Y: 7238924,000 (Granddaughter) Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 40,08 12,50 501,00 fence m 54,75 62,00 3.394,50 Trees u 3,00 82,50 247,50 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 414,30 TOTAL 4.557,30 72 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 73 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Boitshwarelo Name Ms Moroba Leero Moalosi Relationship to HH Granddaughter Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 54.75 Total number of trees 3 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the Comment project and opted for monetary compensation. No space for extension. 74 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification 1-10 A Location: A2-5-AR2 SELAKOLELA Questionnaire: X: Y: Coordinates Owner: GARONA LIQUOR X: Y: Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount 75 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 76 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Name GARONA LIQUOR Relationship to HH Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 0 Total number of trees 0 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the project . Consider the Comment safety of the curve corner affected but not captured by CE. Check if redesign of the curve will not save acquring of this property 77 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification 1-10 B Location: A2-5-AR2 SELAKOLELA Questionnaire: X: Y: Coordinates Owner: X: Y: Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount 78 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 79 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Name Relationship to HH Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of radios 0 Total number of TV’s 0 Total number of cell phones 0 Total number of refrigerators 0 Total number of beds 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 0 Total number of trees 0 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Comment 80 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification: 1-13 Location: A2-5-AR3 SESUNG Questionnaire: Owner: VDC-Kgotla toilets - Mr Balemogeng Ramontsho VDC Coordinates X: 298466,00 Y: 7246144,000 Secretary Affects: DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 29,01 12,50 362,63 fence m 19,35 62,00 1.199,70 toilet m2 23,40 2.500,00 58.500,00 Trees u 0,00 0,00 0,00 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 6.006,23 TOTAL 66.068,56 81 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 82 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Mr Balemogeng Name VDC-Kgotla toilets Ramontsho Relationship to HH VDC Secretary Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 19.35 Total number of trees 0 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The Comment PAP appreciated the project and opted for monetary compensation 83 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification 1-20-NEW Location: A2-5-AR3 SESUNG Questionnaire: X: 300146,69 Y: 7249008,390 Coordinates Owner: Keanolenyana Dinake X: 299803,22 Y: 7248436,010 Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 2347,85 0,30 704,36 fence m 669,06 62,00 41.481,72 Trees u 126 64,44 8.119,65 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 5.030,57 TOTAL 55.336,30 84 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 85 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Keanolenyana Name Dinake Relationship to HH Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 669.06 Total number of trees 126 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the Comment project and opted for monetary compensation. Possible space for extension. 86 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification Location: A2-5-AR3 SESUNG Questionnaire: 1-21-NEW X: 299466,15 Y: 7247913,650 Coordinates Owner: Onkemetse Matsoge X: 299437,97 Y: 7247868,320 Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 38,26 0,30 11,48 fence m 55,1 62,00 3.416,20 Trees u 15 99,00 1.485,00 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 491,27 TOTAL 5.403,95 87 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 88 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Name Onkemetse Matsoge Relationship to HH Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 55.10 Total number of trees 15 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the Comment project and opted for monetary compensation. Possible space for extension. 89 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification 1-14 Location: A2-5-AR4 SESE Questionnaire: Coordinates X: 278968,00 Y: 7272181,000 Owner: Mooketsi Keipeile Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 46,33 12,50 579,13 fence m 28,15 62,00 1.745,30 Trees u 1,00 209,00 209,00 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 253,34 TOTAL 2.786,77 90 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 91 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN 92 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Name Mooketsi Keipeile Relationship to HH Household Head Sex Male Age 74 Education None Still in School No Current Employment Status On-farm production for sale Continuously Ill for more No then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Yes Main source of lighting for this household Paraffin Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Firewood Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? No Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else None (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another None household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there None was no food in the house for them to eat Tap in yard of other Household’s main source of water for domestic use household If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute None Total number of cattle 20 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 12 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 20 Total number of radios 1 Total number of TV’s 0 Total number of cell phones 1 Total number of refrigerators 0 Total number of beds 2 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 1 Total number of fields 1 Total number of houses 2 Total number of toilets 1 Total number of kraals 2 Total number of sheds 1 Total number of fencing 28.15 Total number of trees 1 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The Comment PAP appreciated the project and opted for monetary compensation Happy 93 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification 1-15 Location: A2-5-AR4 SESE Questionnaire: Coordinates X: 277895,00 Y: 7271475,000 Owner: Kesegonyana Rakodu Affected Real DESCRIPTION Unit Rates Amount Quantiti loss of right m2 88,93 12,50 1.111,63 fence m 87,14 62,00 5.402,68 Trees u 0,00 0,00 0,00 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 651,43 TOTAL 7.165.74 94 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 95 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Member 4 Member 5 Kesegonyana Johnson Name Pifilo Mokala Patricia Mokala Mercy Mokala Rakodu Mokala Household Relationship to HH Spouse Child Child Child head Sex Male Female Male Female Female Age Do not know Do not know 25 23 19 More than More than More than Education None None great 12 great 12 great 12 Still in School No No No No No Unemployed Unemployed Formal On-farm Current Employment and seeking and seeking Not in labour employment production for Status work in past 3 work in past 3 market job sale months months Continuously Ill for more No No No No No then 3 months in 2014? Member 6 Member 7 Member 8 Member 9 Member 10 Name Lucia Mokala Joyce Mokala Alex Mokala Letso Mokala Pearl Mokala Relationship to HH Child Child Other relative Other relative Other relative Sex Female Female Male Male Female Age 14 9 4 1 1 Education Middle Lower primary None None None Still in School Yes Yes No No No Current Employment Not in labour Not in labour Not in labour Not in labour Not in labour Status market market market market market Continuously Ill for more No No No No No then 3 months in 2014? 96 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? No Main source of lighting for this household Electricity Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Electricity Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? No Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone None else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another None household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day None because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use Tap in yard own Tap in yard other If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute household Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of radios 0 Total number of TV’s 1 Total number of cell phones 5 Total number of refrigerators 1 Total number of beds 3 Total number of cars 1 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 2 Total number of toilets 1 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 87.14 Total number of trees 0 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the Comment project and opted for monetary compensation No space for extension. 97 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Happy Code Identification 1-16 Location: A2-5-AR4 SESE Questionnaire: Coordinates X: 277791,00 Y: 7271405,000 Owner: Molefe Gabarongwe DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 78,30 12,50 978,75 fence m 42,94 62,00 2.662,28 Trees u 9,00 114,89 1.034,00 Disturbance % 100,00 10,00 467,50 Allowance TOTAL 5.142,53 98 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 99 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Name Molefe Gabarongw Relationship to HH Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 42.94 Total number of trees 9 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the Comment project and opted for monetary compensation. No space for extension. 100 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification 1-17 Location: A2-5-AR4 SESE Questionnaire: Owner: Temogo Rakodu (wife) - (owner-Johane Rakala) - Coordinates X: 277633,00 Y: 7271316,00 (Boitumelo- Daughter) Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 17,57 12,50 219,63 fence m 22,28 62,00 1.381,36 Trees u 4,00 114,89 459,56 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 206,05 TOTAL 2.266,60 101 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 102 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Name Temogo Rakodu Johane Rakala Boitumelo Relationship to HH wife owner Daughter Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 22.28 Total number of trees 4 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the Comment project and opted for monetary compensation. There is possible extension at the back. 103 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification 1-18 Location: A2-5-AR4 SESE Questionnaire: Coordinates X: 277542,00 Y: 7271317,000 Owner: Raeshemane Mokala - (Emmanuel Mokala- Son) Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 10,67 12,50 133,38 fence m 9,97 62,00 618,14 Stand Pipe u 1.300,00 1,00 1.300,00 Trees u 2,00 123,75 247,50 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 229,90 TOTAL 2.528,92 104 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 105 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Raeshemane Mokala Raeshemane Emmanuel Mokala Mokala Relationship to HH SON Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 9.97 Total number of trees 2 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the Comment project and opted for monetary compensation. No space for extension. 106 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification 1-19 Location: A2-5-AR4 SESE Questionnaire: Coordinates X: 277487,00 Y: 7271300,00 Owner: Kelebile & Oabona Mpolokang - (Husband & Wife) Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 7,71 12,50 96,38 fence m 9,00 62,00 558,00 Stand Pipe u 1.300,00 1,00 1.300,00 Trees u 0,00 0,00 0,00 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 195,44 TOTAL 2.149,81 107 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 108 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Name Kelebile Oabona Mpolokang Mpolokang Relationship to HH Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 9.00 Total number of trees 0 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The Comment PAP appreciated the project and opted for monetary compensation. No 109 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN space for extension Code Identification1-22-NEW Location: A2-5-AR4 SESE Questionnaire: X: 279059,71 Y: 7272214,710 Coordinates Owner: Mooketsi Keipeile X: 278835,43 Y: 7272068,630 Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 840,73 0,80 672,58 fence m 267,87 62,00 16.607,94 Trees u 60 133,38 8.002,50 Disturbance Allowance % 100,00 10,00 2.528,30 TOTAL 27.811,33 110 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 111 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Name Mooketsi Keipeile Relationship to HH Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 267.87 Total number of trees 60 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the Comment project and opted for monetary compensation. No space for extension 112 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Code Identification1-23-NEW Location: A2-5-AR4 SESE Questionnaire: X: 278652,06 Y: 7271942,460 Coordinates Owner: Mooketsi Keipeile X: 278594,52 Y: 7271902,970 Affected DESCRIPTION Unit Real Quantiti Rates Amount loss of right m2 35,35 0,30 10,61 fence m 69,79 62,00 4.326,98 Trees u 33 92,50 3.052,50 Disturbance Allowance % 10,00 10,00 739,01 TOTAL 8.129,09 113 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN PHOTOS 114 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Name Mooketsi Keipeile Relationship to HH Sex Age Education Still in School Current Employment Status Continuously Ill for more then 3 months in 2014? Question Response Cash remittances received from persons living outside this household on a regular basis? Main source of lighting for this household Main source of fuel for cooking in this household Household lost any member that was aged under 50 to death? Days in the past month that any household member ate food that was given freely by someone else (incl. government programmes) specifically due to lack of food Days, in the past month that any household member ate food that was borrowed from another household because there was no food in the household Days in the past WEEK that any household member went to sleep without eating that day because there was no food in the house for them to eat Household’s main source of water for domestic use If water is unavailable at the main source, type of water supply relied on as a substitute Total number of cattle 0 Total number of sheep 0 Total number of goats 0 Total number of donkeys 0 Total number of horses/ponies 0 Total number of chickens 0 Total number of pigs 0 Total number of cars 0 Total number of scotch carts 0 Total number of computers 0 Total number of bicycles 0 Total number of fields 0 Total number of houses 0 Total number of toilets 0 Total number of kraals 0 Total number of sheds 0 Total number of fencing 69.79 Total number of trees 33 Total number of wells 0 Total number of boreholes 0 Face to face consultation with affected person. The PAP appreciated the Comment project and opted for monetary compensation. No space for extension 115 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN 116 APPENDIX 2: AFFECTED ASSETS RECORDS AND QUESTIONNAIRES OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Location map showing the proposed layout of the package 1 roads project and the associated archaeological sites in green. APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN SITE 1 S 24°41.578’ E 25°37.456’ Abandoned cattle post The abandoned cattle post is situated within an open clearing on the southern side of the road. It consists of the remains of four houses and a midden, but no fence has remained. An abandoned kraal deposit, 15 m in diameter, is visible and crosses the road fence/boundary into the road reserve. The settlement and the midden exhibit a low-density scatter of artifacts comprising of pieces of glass, ceramic and metal. The cattle post was abandoned about 50 years ago, judging from the artefacts found around the site. Significance and recommendations The abandoned cattle post is partly located within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. It is of social significance and recommendations as per the social impact assessment should be complied with. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves in the kraal and houses, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 10: General view. Figure 11: Abandoned kraal. Figure 12: House remains. Figure 13: Artefacts identified. 2 APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN SITE 2 S 24°41.828’ E 25°36.910’ Late Iron Age The site is characterized by a scatter of potsherds distributed in an area of 100 m along both sides of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate. A slight discolouration of the soil indicates to a scanty kraal/midden deposit. A low density of artefacts consisting of undecorated ceramics and bone was observed. No hut remains were identified. The low presence of artefact remains at the site gives the impression of a brief occupation period. Significance and recommendations The site is located on both sides of the road within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. Because of the low density of artifacts the site is not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore it is assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 14: General view. Figure 15: The midden deposit. Figure 16: Ceramics identified at the site. APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN SITE 3 3a - S 24°41.870’ E 25°36.438’ 3b - S 24°41.890’ E 25°36.366’ Early Iron Age (Baratani facies) The site is located on a slight rise in an area of 80 m along both sides of the road in the road reserve and cleared strip around coordinate 3b. The kraal (coordinate 3a) is characterized by a hardened grey deposit measuring approximately 30 m in diameter. A road culvert was constructed through the kraal indicating a deposit depth in excess of 50 cm. The remains of a hut floor and a midden were identified on the southern side. The surface artefacts comprise of ceramic, bone and burned hut rubble. The decorated ceramics are indicative of the Early Iron Age Baratani tradition. Significance and recommendations The site is situated on both sides of the road within the road reserve and cleared strip area and will be impacted on by the development. A BNMM mitigation requirement category 3 is recommended. This implies that test excavations be executed to determine whether further work is necessary. The site should be conserved or, alternatively, phase 2 mitigation should precede development in this area. Phase 2 mitigation should as a minimum include: 1. Test excavations to salvage a representative sample of the material record; 2. Stratigraphic recording; and 3. Investigation of dating possibilities. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 17: General view. Figure 18: Culvert constructed within the kraal. 4 APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Figure 19: Kraal deposit. Figure 20: House remains. Figure 21: Burned hut rubble. Figure 22: Ceramics identified at the site. Figure 23: Location of site 3 and site 4. APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN SITE 4 4a - S 24°41.903’ E 25°35.985’ 4b - S 24°41.895’ E 25°35.902’ Late Iron Age (Kwena) The site is located on a slight rise in an area of 200 m along both sides of the road in the road reserve and cleared strip between the above given coordinates. The midden is characterized by a typical ash-grey deposit measuring approximately 30 m in diameter. The road cutting indicates a midden deposit depth in excess of 50 cm. No cattle enclosure or hut remains have been identified. The surface artefacts comprise of ceramics and bone fragments. The decorated ceramics are indicative of a Late Iron Age Kwena tradition. Significance and recommendations The site is situated on both sides of the road within the road reserve and cleared strip area and will be impacted on by the development. A BNMM mitigation requirement category 3 is recommended. This implies that test excavations be executed to determine whether further work is necessary. The site should be conserved or, alternatively, phase 2 mitigation should precede development in this area. Phase 2 mitigation should as a minimum include: 1. Test excavations to salvage a representative sample of the material record; 2. Stratigraphic recording; and 3. Investigation of dating possibilities. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 24: General view at point 4a. Figure 25: General view at point 4b. Figure 26: The midden deposit. Figure 27: Ceramics identified at the site. 6 APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN SITE 5 S 24°41.625’ E 25°35.296’ Late Iron Age The site is characterized by a scatter of potsherds distributed in an area of 50 m along both sides of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate. A slight discolouration of the soil indicates to a scanty kraal/midden deposit. A low density of artefacts consisting of undecorated ceramics and bone was observed. No hut remains were identified. The low presence of artefact remains at the site gives the impression of a brief occupation period. Significance and recommendations The site is located on both sides of the road within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. Because of the low density of artifacts the site is not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore it is assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 28: General view. Figure 29: Ceramics identified at the site. SITE 6 S 24°41.407’ E 25°34.733’ Late Iron Age (Kwena) The site is characterized by a scatter of potsherds distributed in an area of 50 m along both sides of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate. A slight discolouration of the soil indicates to a scanty kraal/midden deposit. The surface artefacts comprise of ceramics and bone fragments. The decorated ceramics are indicative of a Late Iron Age Kwena tradition. No hut remains were identified. The low presence of artefact remains at the site gives the impression of a brief occupation period. Significance and recommendations The site is located on both sides of the road within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. Because of the low density of artifacts the site is not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore it is assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN development. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 30: General view. Figure 31: Ceramics identified at the site. SITE 7 S 24°41.258’ E 25°34.263’ Early Stone Age (ESA) The site is characterized by a few ESA tools identified in an area of 500 m along both sides of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate. At undisturbed locations in the road reserve, gravel deposits are found around and on top of the exposed underlying granite bedrock. The road cutting indicates a gravel deposit at a depth of about 50 cm. ESA artifacts were discovered still intact and eroding out of this gravel layer. The raw material used by the toolmakers to produce the ESA artifacts consisted of local river pebbles. The formal tools consist of hand axes and cleavers and were primarily produced from quartzite. Artifact ratios (artifacts: m²) varied from 1:200 to 1:500. Significance and recommendations The finds will be impacted on by the proposed development. Because of the low density of artifacts they are not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore they are assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. 8 APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Figure 32: Exposed granite bedrock formations. Figure 33: Exposed gravel concentrations. Figure 34: In situ pebbles and ESA artefacts. Figure 35: ESA tools identified. SITE 8 S 24°41.136’ E 25°33.773’ Late Iron Age The site is characterized by a scatter of potsherds distributed in an area of 50 m along the southern side of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate. A slight discolouration of the soil indicates to a scanty kraal/midden deposit. A low density of artefacts consisting of undecorated ceramics and bone was observed. No hut remains were identified. The low presence of artefact remains at the site gives the impression of a brief occupation period. Significance and recommendations The site is located on the southern side of the road within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. Because of the low density of artifacts the site is not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore it is assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 36: General view. Figure 37: Ceramics identified at the site. APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN SITE 9 S 24°41.178’ E 25°33.046’ Late Iron Age The site is characterized by a scatter of potsherds distributed in an area of 30 m along the southern side of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate. A slight discolouration of the soil indicates to a scanty kraal/midden deposit. A low density of artefacts consisting of undecorated ceramics and bone was observed. No hut remains were identified. The low presence of artefact remains at the site gives the impression of a brief occupation period. Significance and recommendations The site is located on the southern side of the road within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. Because of the low density of artifacts the site is not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore it is assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 38: General view. Figure 39: Ceramics identified at the site. SITE 10 S 24°41.516’ E 25°32.385’ Historical settlement The site is characterized by a scatter of potsherds distributed in an area of 50 m along the northern side of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate. A slight discolouration of the soil indicates to a scanty midden deposit of 20 m in diameter. A low density of artefacts consisting of modern house rubble, undecorated ceramics and bone was observed. No house remains were identified. The settlement was abandoned about 50 years ago, judging from the artefacts found around the site. Significance and recommendations The site is located within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. Because of the low density of artifacts the site is not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore it is assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement 10 APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 40: General view. Figure 41: Ceramics identified at the site. SITE 11 S 24°41.539’ E 25°31.971’ Historical settlement The site is characterized by a scatter of potsherds distributed in an area of 50 m along the northern side of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate. A slight discolouration of the soil indicates to a kraal deposit of 20 m in diameter. A low density of artefacts consisting of modern house rubble, undecorated ceramics and bone was observed. House remains were identified in the plot next to the road reserve. The settlement was abandoned about 50 years ago, judging from the artefacts found around the site. Significance and recommendations The site is located within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. Because of the low density of artifacts the site is not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore it is assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Figure 42: General view. Figure 43: Ceramics identified at the site. SITE 12 S 24°41.613’ E 25°31.757’ Middle Stone Age (MSA) The site is characterized by a few MSA tools identified in an area of 500 m along both sides of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate. At gravel deposits in the road reserve MSA artifacts were discovered eroding out of the gravel layer. The raw material used by the toolmakers to produce the artifacts consisted of quartzite and chert. The MSA formal tools consist of spear points, blades and scrapers and were primarily produced from quartzite. Artifact ratios (artifacts: m²) varied from 1:100 to 1:300. Significance and recommendations The finds will be impacted on by the proposed development. Because of the low density of artifacts they are not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore they are assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Figure 44: General view. Figure 45: MSA tools identified. SITE 13 S 24°41.844’ E 25°31.378’ Early Stone Age (ESA) The site is characterized by a few ESA tools identified in an area of 1000 m along both sides of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate. At undisturbed locations in the road reserve, gravel deposits are found eroding from the underlying soil. The road cutting indicates a gravel deposit layer at a depth of about 50 cm. ESA artifacts were discovered still intact and eroding out of this gravel layer. The raw material used by the toolmakers to produce the ESA artifacts consisted of local river pebbles. The formal tools consist of hand axes and cleavers and were primarily produced from quartzite. Artifact ratios (artifacts: m²) varied from 1:200 to 1:500. Significance and recommendations The finds will be impacted on by the proposed development. Because of the low density of artifacts they are not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is 12 APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN adequate. Therefore they are assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Figure 46: General view. Figure 47: Exposed gravel formations. Figure 48: In situ ESA artefacts. Figure 49: ESA artefacts identified. SITE 14 S 24°43.301’ E 25°30.864’ Abandoned cattle kraal The abandoned cattle kraal is situated within an open clearing on the northern side of the road in the road reserve. The grey kraal deposit is about 15 m in diameter and no fence has remained. The kraal exhibits a low-density scatter of artifacts comprising of pieces of glass and metal. The cattle post was abandoned about 50 years ago, judging from the artefacts found around the site. Significance and recommendations The abandoned cattle kraal is located within the proposed development area and will be impacted on by the development. It is of social significance and recommendations as per the social impact assessment should be complied with. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Figure 50: General view. Figure 51: Abandoned kraal deposit. SITE 15 S 24°43.525’ E 25°30.679’ Late Iron Age The site is characterized by a scatter of potsherds distributed in an area of 50 m along the northern side of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate. A slight discolouration of the soil indicates to a scanty kraal/midden deposit. A low density of artefacts consisting of undecorated ceramics and bone were observed. No hut remains were identified. The low presence of artefact remains at the site gives the impression of a brief occupation period. Significance and recommendations The site is located within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. Because of the low density of artifacts the site is not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore it is assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 52: General view. Figure 53: Ceramics identified at the site. 14 APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN SITE 16 S 24°43.832’ E 25°30.236’ Early Stone Age (ESA) The site is characterized by a few ESA tools identified in an area of 1000 m along both sides of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate. At undisturbed locations in the road reserve gravel deposits are found eroding from the underlying soil. ESA artifacts were discovered about every 50 m distance along both sides of the road amongst the gravel deposits. The raw material used by the toolmakers to produce the ESA artifacts consisted of local river pebbles. The formal tools consist of hand axes and cleavers and were primarily produced from quartzite. Significance and recommendations The finds will be impacted on by the proposed development. Because of the low density of artifacts they are not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore they are assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Figure 54: General view of the gravels. Figure 55: Exposed gravel formations. Figure 56: ESA artefacts identified. APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN SITE 17 S 24°44.206’ E 25°29.741’ Abandoned Cattle Post The abandoned cattle post is situated within an open clearing on the southern side of the road. It consists of the remains of two houses and a midden, but no fence has remained. An abandoned kraal deposit, 30 m in diameter, is visible and crosses the road fence/boundary into the road reserve. The settlement and the midden exhibit a low-density scatter of artifacts comprising of pieces of glass, ceramic and metal. The cattle post was abandoned about 50 years ago, judging from the artefacts found around the site. Significance and recommendations The abandoned cattle post is partly located within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. It is of social significance and recommendations as per the social impact assessment should be complied with. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves in the kraal and houses, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 57: Abandoned kraal. Figure 58: House remains. Figure 59: House remains. Figure 60: Artefacts. 16 APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN SITE 18 S 24°44.266’ E 25°29.564’ Middle Iron Age (Eiland facies) The site is located on a slight rise in an open clearing in the natural vegetation approximately 300 m in diameter. Potsherds were discovered in an area of 200 m along both sides of the road in the road reserve and cleared strip area around the above given coordinate. A grey coloured kraal deposit was identified on the northern side in the cleared strip. Animal burrow stratigraphy indicates to a deposit depth in excess of 20 cm. House remains were identified to the western side of the site. The surface artefacts comprise of ceramics and bone. The decorated ceramics are indicative of the Eiland tradition. Significance and recommendations The site is situated on both sides of the road within the road reserve and cleared strip area and will be impacted on by the development. A BNMM mitigation requirement category 4 is recommended. This implies the documentation of the site and a systematic representative sampling of the artifacts is necessary. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 61: General view. Figure 62: House remains at the site. Figure 63: The kraal deposit. Figure 64: Ceramics identified. APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN SITE 19 S 24°45.209’ E 25°27.022’ Late Iron Age The site is characterized by a scatter of potsherds distributed in an area of 20 m on the southern side of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate. A discolouration of the soil and burned hut rubble indicates to a house floor in an area of 10 m in diameter. A low density of artefacts consisting of undecorated ceramics and bone was observed. No other features were identified. The low presence of artefact remains at the site gives the impression of a brief occupation period. Significance and recommendations The site is located within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. Because of the low density of artifacts the site is not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore it is assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 65: General view. Figure 66: House remains identified at the site. Figure 67: Burned hut rubble concentrations. Figure 68: Ceramics identified. 18 APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN SITE 20 S 24°45.547’E 25°26.603’ Middle Iron Age (Eiland facies) The site is located on a slight rise in an open clearing on the western side of a small hill. It measures approximately 100 m in diameter. Potsherds were discovered in an area of 50 m along the eastern side of the road in the road reserve and cleared strip area around the above given coordinate. The midden is characterized by a typical ash-grey deposit measuring approximately 30 m in diameter. Animal burrow stratigraphy indicates a midden deposit depth in excess of 20 cm. No cattle enclosure or hut remains have been identified. The surface artefacts comprise of ceramics and bone. The decorated ceramics are indicative of the Eiland tradition. Significance and recommendations The site is situated on the eastern side of the road within the road reserve and cleared strip area and will be impacted on by the development. A BNMM mitigation requirement category 4 is recommended. This implies the documentation of the site and a systematic representative sampling of the artifacts is necessary. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 69: General view. Figure 70: The midden deposit. Figure 71: Ceramics identified at the site. APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN SITE 21 S 24°45.976’ E 25°26.534’ Late Iron Age The site is characterized by a scatter of potsherds distributed in an area of 50 m along both sides of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate. A slight discolouration of the soil indicates to a scanty midden deposit. On the western side of the road a concentration of burned hut rubble indicates to a house floor in an area of 10 m in diameter. A low density of artefacts consisting of undecorated ceramics and bone were observed. The low presence of artefact remains at the site gives the impression of a brief occupation period. Significance and recommendations The site is located on both sides of the road within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. Because of the low density of artifacts the site is not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore it is assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 72: General view. Figure 73: House remains identified at the site. Figure 74: Burned hut rubble concentrations. Figure 75: Ceramics identified. 20 APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN SITE 22 S 24°46.280’ E 25°26.681’ Historical settlement The site is characterized by a scatter of potsherds distributed in an area of 50 m along both sides of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate. A slight discolouration of the soil on the western side of the road indicates to a scanty midden deposit of 20 m in diameter. A low density of artefacts consisting of modern house rubble, undecorated ceramics and bone was observed. The settlement was abandoned about 50 years ago, judging from the artefacts found around the site. Significance and recommendations The site is located within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. Because of the low density of artifacts the site is not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore it is assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 76: General view. Figure 77: Ceramics identified at the site. SITE 23 23a - S 24°46.740’ E 25°25.283’ 23b - S 24°46.608’ E 25°25.031’ 23c - S 24°46.863’ E 25°25.115’ Historical village The historical village of Moshupa was placed on the western side of the small granite hills surrounding the modern day kgotla. Modern buildings and developments were constructed on top of the remains of the historical village. The remains are characterized by a scatter of potsherds and other cultural material distributed in an area of 500 m along both sides of the main road (between coordinates 23b and 23c see Figure 82) and the road leading to the kgotla (coordinate 23a) in the road reserve around the above given coordinates. At some places a discolouration of the soil indicates to midden deposits from the town. A low density of artefacts consisting of ceramics and bone were observed throughout the middens. No house remains were identified. APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Significance and recommendations Parts of the historical village are located on both sides of the road within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. Because of the low density of artifacts the historical village remains are not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore it is assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 78: General view. Figure 79: Historical midden deposits. Figure 80: Historical midden deposits. Figure 81: Ceramics identified at the town. 22 APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Figure 82: Historical town of Moshupa with the associated find spots in red. SITE 24 S 24°47.903’ E 25°21.555’ Historical agricultural fields The fields are characterized by cleared spaces in the natural vegetation. These spaces have been overgrown again by primary bushes and grasses. A scatter of potsherds distributed in an area of 50 m along the southern side of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate indicates to the historic settlement. The low presence of artefact remains at the site gives the impression of a brief occupation period. Significance and recommendations The find spot is located on the southern side of the road within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. Because of the low density of artifacts the site is not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore it is assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Figure 83: General view of the fields. Figure 84: Ceramics identified. SITE 25 S 24°48.398’ E 25°19.804’ Late Iron Age The site is characterized by a scatter of potsherds distributed in an area of 50 m along the northern side of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate. A slight discolouration of the soil indicates to a scanty kraal/midden deposit. A low density of artefacts consisting of undecorated ceramics and bone was observed. No hut remains were identified. The low presence of artefact remains at the site gives the impression of a brief occupation period. Significance and recommendations The site is located on the northern side of the road within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. Because of the low density of artifacts the site is not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore it is assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 85: General view. Figure 86: Ceramics identified at the site. 24 APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN SITE 26 S 24°48.513’ E 25°19.301’ Late Iron Age (Early Moloko facies) The site is located in an open clearing on the western side of a group of small granite hills. It measures approximately 100 m in diameter. Potsherds were discovered in an area of 40 m along both sides of the road in the road reserve and cleared strip area around the above given coordinate. The midden is characterized by a typical ash-grey deposit measuring approximately 30 m in diameter. Animal burrow stratigraphy indicates a midden deposit depth in excess of 20 cm. No cattle enclosure or hut remains have been identified. The surface artefacts comprise of ceramics and bone. The decorated ceramics are indicative of the Early Moloko tradition. Significance and recommendations The site is situated within the road reserve and cleared strip area and will be impacted on by the development. A BNMM mitigation requirement category 4 is recommended. This implies the documentation of the site and a systematic representative sampling of the artifacts is necessary. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 87: General view. Figure 88: The road dissects the site. Figure 89: The midden deposit. Figure 90: Ceramics identified at the site. APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Figure 91: Location of site 26 and site 27. SITE 27 S 24°48.460’ E 25°19.391’ Middle Iron Age (Eiland/Broadhurst facies) The site is located in an open clearing in between a group of small granite hills. It measures approximately 80 m in diameter. Potsherds were discovered in an area of 50 m along both sides of the road in the road reserve and cleared strip around the above given coordinate. An in-situ pot was identified eroding from the existing road surface. The midden is characterized by a typical ash-grey deposit measuring approximately 20 m in diameter. No cattle enclosure or hut remains have been identified. The surface artefacts comprise of ceramics and bone. The decorated ceramics are indicative of the Eiland/Broadhurst tradition. Significance and recommendations The site is situated within the road reserve and cleared strip area and will be impacted on by the development. A BNMM mitigation requirement category 4 is recommended. This implies the documentation of the site and a systematic representative sampling of the artifacts is necessary. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. 26 APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Figure 92: General view to the west. Figure 93: General view to the east. Figure 94: In-situ pot in the road surface. Figure 95: Ceramics identified at the site. SITE 28 S 24°48.685’ E 25°24.836’ Late Iron Age The site is characterized by a scatter of potsherds distributed in an area of 100 m along both sides of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate. A slight discolouration of the soil indicates to a scanty kraal/midden deposit. A low density of artefacts consisting of undecorated ceramics and bone were observed. No hut remains were identified. The low presence of artefact remains at the site gives the impression of a brief occupation period. Significance and recommendations The site is located on both sides of the road within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. Because of the low density of artifacts the site is not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore it is assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Figure 96: General view. Figure 97: Ceramics identified at the site. SITE 29 S 24°49.317’ E 25°24.238’ Middle Iron Age (Eiland & Early Moloko facies) The site is located on a slight rise in an area of 100 m along both sides of the road in the road reserve and cleared strip around the above given coordinate. The midden is characterized by a typical ash-grey deposit measuring approximately 30 m in diameter. The road cutting indicates a midden deposit depth in excess of 30 cm. No cattle enclosure or hut remains have been identified. The surface artefacts comprise of ceramics and bone. The decorated ceramics are indicative of the Eiland & Early Moloko tradition. Significance and recommendations The site is situated on both sides of the road within the road reserve and cleared strip area and will be impacted on by the development. A BNMM mitigation requirement category 4 is recommended. This implies the documentation of the site and a systematic representative sampling of the artifacts is necessary. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 98: General view. Figure 99: The road dissects the site. 28 APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Figure 100: The midden deposit. Figure 101: Ceramics identified at the site. SITE 30 S 24°51.454’ E 25°23.124’ Iron Age pot burial The site is located on a slight rise between a few granite rock boulders in a bend of the road. An isolated in-situ pot was identified on the northern side of the road in the cleared road strip at the above given coordinate. The road cutting indicates a probable house floor at a depth in excess of 30 cm. No cattle enclosure or midden has been identified. The surface artefacts comprise of undecorated ceramics and bone. The eroding in-situ pot could be a probable pot burial under the hut floor. Significance and recommendations The find is situated within the road reserve and cleared strip area and will be impacted on by the development. A BNMM mitigation requirement category 4 is recommended. This implies the documentation of the find and a systematic representative sampling of the artifacts is necessary. Due to the possible occurrence of other unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 102: General view. Figure 103: The road cutting displaying the pot. APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Figure 104: The in-situ pot. SITE 31 S 24°52.045’ E 25°22.355’ Late Iron Age smelting dump The site is characterized by a scatter of potsherds and iron smelting slag distributed in an area of 10 m along the southern side of the road in the road reserve and cleared road strip around the above given coordinate. A slight discolouration of the soil indicates to a scanty midden deposit. A low density of artefacts consisting of undecorated ceramics, slag and bone was observed. No hut remains were identified. Significance and recommendations The site is situated within the road reserve and cleared strip area and will be impacted on by the development. A BNMM mitigation requirement category 4 is recommended. This implies the documentation of the site and a systematic representative sampling of the artifacts is necessary. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 105: General view. Figure 106: The midden and slag deposit. 30 APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Figure 107: Iron smelting slag and pottery identified. SITE 32 S 24°52.170’ E 25°22.202’ Late Iron Age The site is characterized by a scatter of potsherds distributed in an area of 50 m along the southern side of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate. A discolouration of the soil indicates to a midden deposit situated outside the road reserve. A low density of artefacts consisting of undecorated ceramics and bone was observed. No hut remains were identified. The low presence of artefact remains at the site gives the impression of a brief occupation period. Significance and recommendations The site is located on the southern side of the road within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. Because of the low density of artifacts the site is not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore it is assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 108: General view. Figure 109: Ceramics identified at the site. APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN SITE 33 S 24°52.580’ E 25°21.863’ Late Iron Age The site is characterized by a scatter of potsherds distributed in an area of 50 m along both sides of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate. A slight discolouration of the soil indicates to a scanty kraal/midden deposit. A low density of artefacts consisting of undecorated ceramics and bone was observed. No hut remains were identified. The low presence of artefact remains at the site gives the impression of a brief occupation period. Significance and recommendations The site is located on both sides of the road within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. Because of the low density of artifacts the site is not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore it is assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 110: General view. Figure 111: Ceramics identified at the site. SITE 34 34a - S 24°56.957’ E 25°17.998’ 34b - S 24°56.976’ E 25°17.742’ 34c - S 24°56.897’ E 25°17.643’ Late Iron Age (Ngwaketse) The site is characterized by a scatter of potsherds distributed in an area of 300 m along both sides of the A10 main road around the intersection with the A2 highway. It also extends for 300 m along both sides of the A2 (see Figure 118). The finds were identified in the road reserve around the above given coordinates. Disturbed and eroded soil surfaces indicate to scanty midden deposits in several places distributed across the site. A low density of artefacts consisting of undecorated ceramics and bone were observed. No hut remains were identified. The low presence of artefact remains at the site gives the impression of a brief occupation period. 32 APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Significance and recommendations The site is located on both sides of the road within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. Because of the low density of artifacts the site is not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore it is assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 112: General view at point 34a. Figure 113: General view at point 34b. Figure 114: General view at point 34c. Figure 115: In-situ ceramic scatter. Figure 116: Ceramics identified at point 34b. Figure 117: Ceramics identified at point 34a APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Figure 118: Location of site 34 around the Kanye intersection. SITE 35 S 24°56.451’ E 25°15.674’ Late Iron Age (burned kraal) The site is located in an open clearing on the northern side of the A2 highway. It measures approximately 100 m in diameter. Potsherds were discovered in a midden area of 50 m along the northern side of the road in the road reserve and cleared strip around the above given coordinate. The midden is characterized by a typical ash-grey deposit measuring approximately 50 m in diameter. A burned kraal deposit of 15 m in diameter was identified outside the road reserve. The surface artefacts comprise of ceramics and bone. The decorated ceramics are indicative of a Late Moloko tradition. Significance and recommendations The site is situated within the road reserve and cleared strip area and will be impacted on by the development. A BNMM mitigation requirement category 4 is recommended. This implies the documentation of the site and a systematic representative sampling of the artifacts is necessary. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. 34 APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Figure 119: General view of the midden. Figure 120: The burned kraal deposit. Figure 121: Burned cattle dung fragment. Figure 122: Ceramics identified at the site. SITE 36 S 24°55.712’ E 25°13.787’ Late Iron Age The site is characterized by a scatter of potsherds distributed in an area of 50 m along the southern side of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate. A slight discolouration of the soil indicates to a scanty kraal/midden deposit. A low density of artefacts consisting of undecorated ceramics and bone was observed. No hut remains were identified. The low presence of artefact remains at the site gives the impression of a brief occupation period. Significance and recommendations The site is located within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. Because of the low density of artifacts the site is not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore it is assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Figure 123: General view. Figure 124: Ceramics identified at the site. SITE 37 S 24°55.109’ E 25°14.200’ Early Stone Age (ESA) The site is characterized by a few ESA tools identified in an area of 1000 m along both sides of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate. In the road reserve and at adjacent areas gravel deposits are found eroding from the underlying soil. ESA artifacts were discovered about every 30 m distance along both sides of the road amongst the gravel deposits. The gravel deposits become less in the direction of the Moshaneng kgotla but ESA tools were still identified along the route. The raw material used by the toolmakers to produce the ESA artifacts consisted of local river pebbles. The formal tools consist of hand axes and cleavers and were primarily produced from quartzite. Significance and recommendations The finds will be impacted on by the proposed development. Because of the low density of artifacts they are not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore they are assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Figure 125: General view. Figure 126: Exposed gravel formations. 36 APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Figure 127: Gravel formations. Figure 128: ESA artefacts identified. SITE 38 S 24°56.825’ E 25°06.862’ Historic settlement The historical village of Selokolela is situated on the banks of a dry riverbed. Watering wells were dug in the riverbed to draw water from attested by potsherds identified around these wells. The site is characterized by a scatter of potsherds distributed in an area of 50 m along both sides of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate. A slight discolouration of the soil indicates to a scanty midden deposit. A low density of artefacts consisting of ceramics and bone were observed. The decorated ceramics are indicative of a Late Moloko tradition. No hut remains were identified. The low presence of artefact remains at the site gives the impression of a brief occupation period. Significance and recommendations The site is located on both sides of the road within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. Because of the low density of artifacts the site is not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore it is assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 129: General view. Figure 130: Ceramics identified at the site. APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN SITE 39 S 24°56.925’ E 25°07.082’ Middle Stone Age (MSA) The site is characterized by eroding pebble formations in a fossil riverbed. MSA tools were identified amongst the pebble formations in an area of 100 m along both sides of the road in the road reserve around the above given coordinate. In a nearby quarry in the riverbed the soil profile indicates to a gravel deposit layer at a depth of about 20 cm above a limestone bedrock formation. MSA artifacts were discovered still intact and eroding out of this gravel layer. The raw material used by the toolmakers to produce the artifacts consisted of quartzite and chert. The MSA formal tools consist of spear points, blades and scrapers and were primarily produced from quartzite. Artifact ratios (artifacts: m²) varied from 1:20 to 1:50. Significance and recommendations The finds will be impacted on by the proposed development. Because of the low density of artifacts they are not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore they are assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Figure 131: General view of the riverbed. Figure 132: Exposed gravel formations. Figure 133: Gravel layer above the limestone. Figure 134: MSA artefacts identified. 38 APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN SITE 40 S 24°51.412’ E 25°01.443’ Abandoned Cattle Post The abandoned cattle post is situated within an open clearing in the natural vegetation. It consists of the remains of a house and a midden, but no fence has remained. The remains of an abandoned kraal, 20 m in diameter, are visible to the north of the road. The remains of another abandoned kraal, 15 m in diameter, are visible to the south of the road in the vicinity of the house remains. The settlement and the midden exhibit a low-density scatter of artifacts comprising of pieces of glass, ceramic and metal. The cattle post was abandoned about 50 years ago, judging from the artefacts found around the site. Significance and recommendations The abandoned cattle post is located within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. It is of social significance and recommendations as per the social impact assessment should be complied with. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves in the kraal and house, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 135: General view. Figure 136: Abandoned kraal. Figure 137: House remains. Figure 138: Artefacts. APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN SITE 41 S 24°58.727’ E 25°20.088’ Traditional kraal and kgotla The traditional kraal and kgotla is characterized by a low stone wall complex built in front of a modern day homestead in the town of Kanye. The complex is situated on the northern side of the road in the road reserve at the above given coordinate. A 0.5 m high stone wall built kraal of about 10 m in diameter has an opening facing the entrance to the modern day homestead. Two further stone walls were added to the kraal to create a kgotla space. Many modern day homesteads in Kanye exhibit private kgotla in front of their yards. No artefacts were observed around the kraal and kgotla. The walls were built from local rocks and cement blocks giving an impression of a recently built complex. The complex may have an historical connotation. Significance and recommendations The complex is located within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. It is of social significance and recommendations as per the social impact assessment should be complied with. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves in the kraal, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 139: View of the kraal. Figure 140: View of the private kgotla. SITE 42 42a - S 24°59.119’ E 25°20.682’ 42b - S 24°59.194’ E 25°20.729’ 42c - S 24°59.717’ E 25°21.180’ Historical town The historical town of Kanye was placed on a gentle slope on the western side of a hill. The existing main road, modern buildings and developments were constructed on top of the remains of the historical town. The remains are characterized by a scatter of potsherds and other cultural material distributed in an area of 1500 m along both sides of the main road (between coordinates 42a and 42c see Figure 147) in the road reserve around the above given coordinates. At some places a discolouration of the soil indicates to midden deposits from the town. A low density of artefacts consisting of ceramics and bone were observed throughout the middens. No house remains were identified. 40 APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Significance and recommendations Parts of the historical town are located on both sides of the road within the road reserve area and will be impacted on by the development. Because of the low density of artifacts the historical town remains are not deemed to be considered for mitigation and the documentation thereof is adequate. Therefore it is assigned a BNMM mitigation requirement category 5 and no archaeological mitigation is required prior to development. Due to the possible occurrence of unidentified graves, it is recommended that a watch brief and monitoring program be implemented during development. Figure 141: General view at point 42a. Figure 142: General view at point 42b. Figure 143: General view at point 42c. Figure 144: Ceramics identified at point 42a. Figure 145: Ceramics identified at point 42b. Figure 146: Ceramics identified at point 42c APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED OPRC PACKAGE 1: A10/A2 – MMANKGODI – KANYE - JWANENG ROAD ABBREVIATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN Figure 147: The town of Kanye with the associated find spots in red. SITE 43 S 24°58.417’ E 25°18.138’ Probable grave site The probable single marked grave is located in the south western corner of the proposed construction camp plot 1. The grave consists of a 2 m x 1 m packed stone mount placed in an east-west direction. No headstone or other markings are associated with the grave. Significance and recommendations The probable grave is located within the proposed plot 1 development area and will be impacted on by the proposed development. Gravesites are protected under the PHA and should be conserved. Alternatively they may be relocated subject to the prescribed grave relocation procedures as negotiated with the affected parties. If the developer wishes to conserve the gravesite, it is recommended that the gravesite should be signposted, fenced and administered by a grave management plan. Figure 148: General view of the gravesite. Figure 149: Packed stones of the probable grave. 42 APPENDIX 4: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES IDENTIFIED