Small Hydro Mapping in Indonesia INCEPTION REPORT July 2014 This report was prepared by GESTO, AQUALOGUS and INDONESIA HYDRO Consult, under contract to The World Bank. It is one of several outputs from the small hydro resource mapping component of the activity Energy Resource Mapping and Geospatial Planning Indonesia [Project ID: P145273]. This activity is funded and supported by the Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP), a multi-donor trust fund administered by The World Bank, under a global initiative on Renewable Energy Resource Mapping. Further details on the initiative can be obtained from the ESMAP website. This document is an interim output from the above-mentioned project. Users are strongly advised to exercise caution when utilizing the information and data contained, as this has not been subject to full peer review. The final, validated, peer reviewed output from this project will be the Indonesia Small Hydro Atlas, which will be published once the project is completed. Copyright © 2014 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / THE WORLD BANK Washington DC 20433 Telephone: +1-202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This work is a product of the consultants listed, and not of World Bank staff. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work and accept no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because The World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for non-commercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Any queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: +1-202-522-2625; e-mail: pubrights@worldbank.org. Furthermore, the ESMAP Program Manager would appreciate receiving a copy of the publication that uses this publication for its source sent in care of the address above, or to esmap@worldbank.org. SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANNING INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT July 2014 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PROJECT SYNOPSIS .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 ESMAP ..............................................................................................................................................................................2 2.2 THE CONSULTANT .................................................................................................................................................................3 2.3 OBJECTIVES ..........................................................................................................................................................................4 2.4 THE CONSULTANT’S TECHNICAL PROPOSAL ................................................................................................................................5 2.5 CONTENT OF THE REPORT .......................................................................................................................................................7 3 INCEPTION MISSION ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 PLAN ..................................................................................................................................................................................8 3.2 DATA COLLECTION.................................................................................................................................................................8 3.2.1 Data requests..........................................................................................................................................................8 3.2.2 Data collected .........................................................................................................................................................8 3.2.3 Key data ..................................................................................................................................................................8 3.3 ASSESSMENT OF THE COLLECTED DATA.....................................................................................................................................12 3.3.1 Dams and Hydropower Projects in operation and planned ..................................................................................12 3.3.2 Hydrological data .................................................................................................................................................17 3.3.3 Forest areas ..........................................................................................................................................................20 3.3.4 Protected areas.....................................................................................................................................................22 3.3.5 Land cover.............................................................................................................................................................23 3.3.6 Land property .......................................................................................................................................................24 3.3.7 Road and Railroad network ..................................................................................................................................24 3.3.8 Morphological data ..............................................................................................................................................25 3.3.9 Administrative boundaries ....................................................................................................................................27 3.3.10 Settlements and population .............................................................................................................................28 3.3.11 Topographic maps ...........................................................................................................................................30 4 THE SMALL HYDROPOWER IN INDONESIA AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL PLANNING .................................................... 32 4.1 THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK ......................................................................................................................................................32 4.1.1 Electricity sector....................................................................................................................................................32 4.1.2 Other required licenses .........................................................................................................................................36 4.1.3 LocaL Permit .........................................................................................................................................................36 4.1.4 Environmental Administration ..............................................................................................................................37 4.1.5 Forestry Administration ........................................................................................................................................40 4.2 IDENTIFIED STAKEHOLDERS....................................................................................................................................................41 4.3 IDENTIFIED CHALLENGES .......................................................................................................................................................42 4.4 PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE PRELIMINARY METHODOLOGY .........................................................................................................44 4.5 FINAL METHODOLOGY PROPOSAL ..........................................................................................................................................46 4.6 MILESTONES ......................................................................................................................................................................65 4.7 WORKPLAN........................................................................................................................................................................66 5 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................................................... 67 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................................................... 69 i ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT FIGURES Figure 2.1 – Objectives of the project Small Hydropower Mapping in Indonesia and Improved Geospatial Planning. .........................................................................................................................................................................................5 Figure 2.2 – Workflow with the technical approach and methodology from the CONSORTIUM original Technical Proposal. .........................................................................................................................................................................................7 Figure 3.1 - Existing hydropower capacity and total capacity per region (GW), RUPTL. ..............................................................12 Figure 3.2 - Future hydropower capacity and total capacity per region (GW), RUPTL.................................................................12 Figure 3.3 - Future hydropower projects with PPA agreements. .................................................................................................13 Figure 3.4 - Existing hydropower capacity per type and region (RUPTL data, CONSULTANT analysis). .......................................13 Figure 3.5 - Future hydropower capacity per type and region (RUPTL data, CONSULTANT analysis). ........................................14 Figure 3.6 - Hydropower plants in operation (CONSULTANT analysis). .......................................................................................14 Figure 3.7 - Faulty daily data per month in station Sabang/Cut Bau and Palembang/St. M. Ba. .................................................17 Figure 3.8 - Mean annual rainfall in Indonesia (WorldClim data, CONSULTANT processing). .....................................................19 Figure 3.9 – Mean annual temperature in Indonesia (WorldClim data, CONSULTANT processing). ...........................................20 Figure 3.10 - Forest areas (MoFo data, CONSULTANT processing). .............................................................................................21 Figure 3.11 - Protected areas (WPDA data, CONSULTANT processing)........................................................................................22 Figure 3.12 - Land Cover (MoFo data, CONSULTANT processing). ...............................................................................................23 Figure 3.13 – Land Cover (GlobCover 2010 data, GESTO processing). .........................................................................................24 Figure 3.14 - Road and rails network (VMAP data, CONSULTANT processing). ...........................................................................25 Figure 3.15 - Digital global elevation data (SRTM data, CONSULTANT processing). ....................................................................26 Figure 3.16 - Administrative divisions, regency and city level (GADM data, GESTO processing). ................................................28 Figure 3.17 - Settlements in Manggarai regency, NTT (GNS data, GESTO analysis). ....................................................................29 Figure 3.18 - BIG Cartograms by region........................................................................................................................................30 Figure 4.1 – Flowchart for direct appointment method for Small Hydropower. .........................................................................34 Figure 4.2 - Scheme of the AMDAL procedures. ..........................................................................................................................39 Figure 4.3 – The database’s level of access. .................................................................................................................................45 Figure 4.4 - Workflow with technical approach and final methodology. .....................................................................................46 Figure 4.5 - Workflow of small hydro prioritizing process............................................................................................................53 Figure 4.6 - Summary representation of the workflow for the surface runoff modeling. ...........................................................55 ii ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT TABLES Table 3.1 – Meetings during the Inception Mission. ......................................................................................................................9 Table 3.2 – Requested data. .........................................................................................................................................................10 Table 3.3 – RUPTL hydropower projects with unknown location. ...............................................................................................15 Table 3.4 – Identified hydropower plants without RUPTL correspondence. ...............................................................................15 Table 3.5 - Reclassification of the forest areas from the MoFo. ..................................................................................................20 Table 3.6 - Comparison between alternative DEM datasets. .......................................................................................................27 Table 4.1 - Summary of hydro potential. ......................................................................................................................................33 Table 4.2 - Small Hydro Projects Plan for 2013-2022 (RUPTL). ....................................................................................................33 Table 4.3 - Feed-in tariff levels. ....................................................................................................................................................35 Table 4.4 – Other required licenses. .............................................................................................................................................36 Table 4.5 - Electricity and energy utilization activities needed to conduct an AMDAL. ...............................................................38 Table 4.6 - Utilization of forest areas by development activities beside forestry production, P.16/Menhut- II/2014. .........................................................................................................................................................................................41 Table 4.7 - Workshop sessions target, topics and duration. ........................................................................................................58 ANNEXES Annex I – Terms of Reference Annex II – Meeting Reports Annex III – Data and Info Requirements Annex IV – Hydropower Plants in Operation Annex V – List of Hydropower Projects in RUPTL 2013-2022 Annex VI – Proposed MoU iii ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADB Asian Development Bank AMDAL Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan (Environmental Impact Assessment) ANDAL Analisis Dampak Lingkungan Hidup (Environmental Impact Analysis) ASTER Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission And Reflection Radiometer BIG Badan Informasi Geospasial (Geospatial Information Agency) BMKG Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, Dan Geofisika (Indonesian Agency For Meteorology, Climatology And Geophysics) BPS Badan Pusat Statistik (Statistics Indonesia) CSP Concentrated Solar Power DEM Digital Elevation Model DivEBT Divisi Energi Baru Dan Terbarukan (New And Renewable Energy Division) ESMAP The Energy Sector Management Assistance Program FC Financial Closure FiT Feed-in-tariff GADM Global Administrative Areas GEP Geospatial Electrification Planning GIS Geographic Information System GIZ Gesellschaft Für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GNS Geonet Names Server GPCP Global Precipitation Climatology Project GTOPO Global Topography IHC Indonesia Hydro Consult IMB Izin Mendirikan Bangunan (Building Construction Permit) IP Inception Phase IPP Independent Power Producer IT Information Technology IUCN International Union For Conservation Of Nature IUPTL Izin Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik (Electricity Business Permit) JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency KA-ANDAL Kerangka Acuan Analisis Dampak Lingkungan Hidup (Environmental Management Plan) KEN Kebijakan Energi Nasional (National Energy Policy) LCOE Levelized Cost Of Electricity LHP Large Hydropower METI The Ministry Of Economy, Trade, And Industry Of Japan MHP Mini Hydropower MoEMR The Ministry Of Energy And Mineral Resources Of Indonesia MoFo The Ministry Of Forestry Of Indonesia NASA United States National Aeronautics And Space Administration NCAR National Center For Atmospheric Research iv ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT NCEP National Centers For Environmental Prediction NGO Non-Governmental Organization NTB Nusa Tenggara Barat NTT Nusa Tenggara Timur OTEC Ocean Thermal Energy Conservation PEN Pengelolaan Energi Nasional (Blueprint Of National Energy Management) PLN Perusahaan Listrik Negara (State Electricity Company) PLTD Pusat Listrik Tenaga Diesel (Diesel Power Plant) PLTM Pusat Listrik Tenaga Mini (Mini Hydropower Plant) PLTP Pusat Listrik Tenaga Panas Bumi (Geothermal Power Plant) PPA Power Purchase Agreement PS Pump-Storage Hydropower RE Renewable Energy RKL Rencana Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup (Environmental Management Plan) RPL Rencana Pemantauan Lingkungan Hidup (Environmental Monitoring Plan) RUKD Rencana Umum Ketenagalistrikan Daerah (Regional General Plan Of Electricity) RUKN Rencana Umum Ketenagalistrikan Nasional (Electricity Master plan) RUPTL Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik (Power Supply Business Plan) RUPTL Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik (Electrification Development Program) SHP Small Hydropower SHP Small Hydropower SRTM Shuttle Radar Topography Mission TRMM Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission UKL Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup (Environmental Management Efforts) UNEP United Nations Environment Programme UPL Upaya Pemantauan Lingkungan Hidup (Environment Monitoring Efforts) USAID United States Agency For International Development USGS United States Geological Survey VMAP Vector Map WB World Bank WCMC World Conservation Monitoring Center WCPA World Comission On Protected Areas WDPA World Database Protected Areas WMO World Meteorological Organization v ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT 1 PROJECT SYNOPSIS Project title: Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning in Indonesia Project Number: Selection No. 1125330 Country: Indonesia Project objectives: Facilitate and improve the planning and investment process for small hydro development in both grid and isolated systems through: a) Building up a central database on small hydro at national scale and validating the mapping of small hydro in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi b) Improved electrification planning by integrating small hydro potential for the provinces of NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi into the planning process Expected results:  National Small Hydro Resource Database with statistics and relevant GIS data  Small Hydro Mapping Report outlining national information on small hydro in Indonesia, including maps of existing, planned and potential schemes  A report/annex on small hydro potential in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi for both grid expansion and isolated systems  Workshop and introductory training in the small hydro GIS database  A list of prioritized small hydro development sites in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi, including recommendations for further studies, investigation and monitoring to support the development of the schemes  Recommendations on improvement of the existing Geospatial Electrification Planning tool to take into account small hydro potential  Input data on small hydro potential for the least cost geospatial electrification planning for NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi  Update final reporting coordinated with the parallel contract to give a complete description of the Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning process in Indonesia  Final Workshop  Training on Small Hydro GIS database and Small Hydro Potential Evaluation Contract signing date: February 12, 2014 Project duration after final methodology approval: 22 months 1 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT 2 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Inception Report is to describe the Project approach and methodology in detail, and to describe the Consultants activities in the Inception Phase (IP) of the Project. The main objective of this chapter is to inform the reader about the background of this World Bank project, the Consultant’s Consortium, the objectives of the projects and to outline the contents of the report. 2.1 ESMAP The Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP) is a global knowledge and technical assistance program administered by The World Bank and supported by 11 bilateral donors. ESMAP’s efforts focus on energy security, energy access, and climate change, and involve three core services: i) analytical work, ii) knowledge clearinghouse, and iii) operational support to The World Bank regions for technical assistance work at the country level. Carrying out RE resource mapping and geospatial analysis at the country level helps to scale up the deployment of biomass, small hydro, solar and wind electricity generation, particularly in countries where one or more of these sources of power are underdeveloped. This is because such mapping is a crucial step to developing a policy framework to guide investment in RE electricity generation which, along with publicly-available data, helps reduce transaction costs and speeds up deployment by providing commercial developers with:  Increased certainty that projects are likely to be approved or permitted with minimal bureaucracy and delay  Data transparency and a level playing field, thereby reducing barriers to the entry and limiting the scope of corruption  A baseline of reliable data that can help guide prospecting activities and can be used for data verification purposes  A better informed off-taker or purchasing authority, thereby improving the price negotiation process In response, ESMAP has launched a new initiative to support country-driven efforts to improve RE resource awareness, put in place appropriate policy frameworks for RE development, and provide “open access” to resource and geospatial mapping data. One of the key elements of this ESMAP initiative wa s to select consulting firms and establish framework agreements for the procurement of resource data and mapping services. On the scope of “Small Hydropower Resource Data and Mapping Service”, the Consultant Consortium (CONSORTIUM) headed by Gesto Energy Consulting (GESTO), also including Aqualogus, Engenharia e Ambiente (AQUALOGUS) and GAF AG was successfully selected for the framework agreement with The World Bank. The current project “Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Planning” is under the scope of the framework agreement with The World Bank. 2 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT For the renewable energy mapping based on hydropower, The World Bank hired qualified consulting firms with demonstrated capabilities in providing Small Hydro Power resource mapping and related services. The Indefinite Delivery Contract commenced on May 28, 2013, and is expected to end by 2017. The tender for Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Electrification Planning in Indonesia was released under this contract in late 2013. For this particular tender, the Consultant’s Association (CONSULTANT) is led by GESTO, and includes AQUALOGUS and Indonesia Hydro Consult, as a local partner. After the tenders’ evaluation in early 2014, the World Bank informed the CONSULTAT that it was chosen to perform the Project. After a period of negotiation the Contract was signed on February 12 2014. The project will build on previous efforts for the assessment of renewable energy potential and electrification funded by The World Bank (ASTAE-AusAID-ESMAP), ADB, AusAid, Norwegian Government, USAID and others. The resource mapping activity is part of a broader World Bank program of technical assistance that will assist in the implementation of the 1,000 Island Electrification Program via scaling up renewable energy, resource mapping, geospatial planning and capacity building of key stakeholders in each of the above areas. The Terms of Reference for the Tender are presented in Annex I. 2.2 THE CONSULTANT GESTO, the leading partner, is an international consultant specialized in energy and in the evaluation of renewable resources. GESTO has know-how and experience in the development of renewable energy policy as well as master plans and supports all phases of renewable energy project development. With a wide scope of expertise, including but not limited to, hydro resource study and evaluation, project analysis and prioritization, and support for projects development, GESTO track record includes, not only, resource mapping - more than 15 resource maps in the last 4 years – but also, the development of Hydro Atlas and projects identification for Cape Verde, East Timor, Mozambique and Angola, and a 5 MW Solar plant development in Cape Verde (Santiago Island) - the largest built in Africa at that time. Currently, GESTO presents a worldwide portfolio of concluded and on-going projects: Renewable Energy Roadmap to 2020 (Cape Verde), Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) Plant Pre-Feasibility Study (Namibia), Mozambique Renewable Energy Atlas, Angola Energy Vision to 2025, Renewable Electrification Plan of East Timor and Project Development for Renewable Auctions in South Africa. Aqualogus, Engenharia e Ambiente (AQUALOGUS) core business is dedicated consultancy and engineering design services in water and environmental projects. The company has 16 years’ experience in hydropower projects evaluation, feasibility assessment and design. It has recently developed/participated a number of studies and designs of hydropower schemes, dams and environmental assessments, worth highlighting the evaluation of the small hydro potential (<10 MW) 3 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT potential for the Portuguese territory and the Tagus hydrologic region hydropower potential mapping and location, as well as the following related projects:  Medium and small hydropower plants: more than 30 studies and designs in the last 10 years, with installed power ranging from 500 kW to 30 MW, in Portugal, Mozambique, Cape Verde and Brazil.  Large dam designs: several embankment and concrete structures for hydro agricultural schemes (mostly in the large multipurpose Alqueva project), hydropower and water supply (detailed design in the last 5 years of Fridão 35 m gravity dam, Daivões 75 m gravity dam, Odelouca 76 m earth dam).  Environmental impact assessment studies of hydropower plants (more than 15 in the last 10 years) and of hydraulic schemes (more than 20 000 ha of irrigation projects). Indonesia Hydro Consult (IHC) is one of the fastest growing hydro engineering consulting service companies in Indonesia. They are leading providers of hydro project solutions and provide high quality on-site and remote consulting services for growing hydro developers nationwide and give them a significant development benefit. Their objective is to enhance the success of their clients by providing solutions for projects and cost-effective consulting services for their business needs. IHC has expertise in the field of hydro engineering nationwide in Indonesia. The experience gained from site reconnaissance, planning and studies, design and design reviews, and construction assistances have made them capable to offer comprehensive consultancy services. Their benefits from the previous projects enable them to offer improvement at every step of the project. Their experience and resources enable innovative development to assemble project teams quickly, based on the technical requirements of each project. 2.3 OBJECTIVES After the 2013 Scoping Mission by the ESMAP team in Jakarta it was concluded that small hydro can play a role in clean power generation in Indonesia, and that there was interest from both the public and private investors to develop small hydro, but that there lacked promotion and coordinated planning of small hydro development. Hence the ESMAP current contribution for small hydro in Indonesia (Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Planning in Indonesia) has an overall objective to mainstream small hydro into the planning process for generation growth and electrification planning in Indonesia. More precisely the consultancy services have the specific purpose to facilitate and improve the planning process of small hydro in both grid and isolated systems through establishment of GIS-based databases, which will help PLN to optimize development and avoid conflicts with long-term maximized utilization of the resource and to promote and facilitate the role of small hydro in remote areas and in isolated grid systems, where the need is to go from planning small hydro based on maximized capacity and least cost 4 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT of energy, to customizing schemes to demand to get the highest benefit of substituting fossil fuel generating plants. The objectives of the project are schematically presented in Figure 2.1. Facilitate and Improve the planning process Integrate small hydro potential Avoid conflicts in the improved with long term electrification maximized (NTT, Maluku, utilization of the Maluku Utara Mainstream resource and Sulawesi) small hydro into the planning process for generation and Promote and Building up a electrification facilitate de role central database of small hydro in on small hydro remote areas (National Level) Customizing and isolated grid schemes (stand systems alone or hybrid) to demand to get the highest benefit of substituting diesel Figure 2.1 – Objectives of the project Small Hydropower Mapping in Indonesia and Improved Geospatial Planning. Moreover, the consultancy services will be done in parallel on two vectors following PLN’s interest:  Building up a central database on small hydro at a national scale to be housed in PLN’s central office in Jakarta.  Improved electrification planning by integrating small hydro potential for the provinces of NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi in eastern Indonesia. The two components will be linked through developing the national database on small hydro in such a way that it can feed input to the geospatial electrification planning tool, which is in the long-term aimed to be implemented for the entire country. 2.4 THE CONSULTANT’S TECHNICAL PROPOSAL The Terms of Reference clearly requested the work to be grouped into two main activities:  Activity 1 – Data collection and production of a national small hydro GIS database, review and validation of small hydro potential for NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi 5 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT  Activity 2 – Support to the inclusion of small hydro potential to the geospatial electrification planning for NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi As an optional activity, a training component was requested and contracted within the scope of the project. The training activity aims to provide PLN the required skills to host, operate and further develop the National Database, as well as to perform the required analysis to prioritize the Small Hydropower Projects (SHP) in the region, according to the established multi-criteria analysis. The objectives of Activity 1 are:  To carry out an inception phase and draw an inception report  To create a GIS database for national information on SHP development  To create the list of the most promising SHP sites in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi  To produce the Small Hydropower Mapping Report and promote a workshop for results presentation to client and relevant stakeholders The objectives of Activity 2 are:  To create a list of potential SHP sites in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi to be incorporated in the Geospatial Electrification Planning (GEP) Tool  To draw policy recommendations on the development of SHP in Indonesia  To produce the Final Report and promote the Final Workshop for the client and relevant stakeholders For the development of these activities, the CONSORTIUM proposed a methodology best described in the workflow of interconnected sub-activities and tasks presented in Figure 2.2. The original methodology and schedule for the development of the proposed tasks are reviewed in this inception report. 6 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT Figure 2.2 – Workflow with the technical approach and methodology from the CONSORTIUM original Technical Proposal. 2.5 CONTENT OF THE REPORT Chapters 1 and 2 are the introduction to the project. Chapter 3 describes the Inception Mission. In Chapter 4 we present the project and the final methodology proposal. In this chapter the legal framework is described and the stakeholders are identified. Key challenges are acknowledged, either in the project implementation itself or in the overall development of hydropower in Indonesia. These key challenges lead to some changes in the preliminary methodology. Finally, the proposal for the final methodology, milestones and work plan is presented. In Chapter 5 the main findings from the Inception Mission are presented. 7 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT 3 INCEPTION MISSION In this chapter we first present the inception plan, the activities carried out and the meetings held. After this, we present the data collected up to the present date and its evaluation. 3.1 PLAN The Inception Mission occurred from March 24 till April 16, in Jakarta, and its main objectives were:  To promote the inception meeting with PLN  To identify any required changes to the methodology  Carrying out a preliminary data collection activity  To identify major stakeholders in the small hydropower development  Assessing major challenges in the project For its development, Mr. Jorge André and Ms. Joana Santos from GESTO and Mr. Dhani Irwanto and Mr. Chandra Adriawan from IHC had several meetings with the client, as well as agencies and institutions currently developing work on hydropower in Indonesia. The program is presented in Table 3.1. All the meetings were documented in meeting reports, presented in Annex II. 3.2 DATA COLLECTION 3.2.1 DATA REQUESTS During the Inception Mission, and as suggested in the Terms of Reference from the Request for Proposals stage, PLN was identified as the most relevant holder of information on small hydropower development and some data was therefore requested, as presented in Annex III. Most importantly, a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) regarding the data provision of PLN data to the CONSULTANT was drafted and submitted to approval, thus establishing the framework, procedures and confidentiality issues related to said provision (Annex VI). In the sequence of the meetings held with other relevant stakeholders, additional data was found to be useful and requested at said meetings. All the requested data is summarized in Table 3.2 in the next subchapter, along with the data collected up to date. 3.2.2 DATA COLLECTED The status of the collected data, in reference to the data requested is summarized in Table 3.2. 3.2.3 KEY DATA From the list presented in Table 3.2, some data held by PLN is considered crucial for the development of the project, mainly:  JICA study 1999 – Map info database 8 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT  PLN’s list of IPP’s request  PLN’s development projects  PLN’s database on existing hydropower plants  Electrical grid dataset In the event that some of this data may not be available to the CONSULTANT, some potential alternative approaches are presented in sub-section 4.3. Table 3.1 – Meetings during the Inception Mission. Institution Date Participants Objectives PLN – DivEBT March 25, Moch Sofyan, Sutyio Brief team and project presentations 5 pm to 6 pm Siswanto, Dhruva Sahai, Designation of the expected team counterpart Jorge André, Joana Santos First interaction to approach client’s needs and impressions on small hydropower mapping Schedule of follow-up comprehensive kick-off meeting PLN - DivEBT March 28, Moch Sofyan, Sutiyo CONSULTANT presentation 10 am to 11 Siswanto, Dhruva Sahai, ESMAP Framework for Small Hydropower am Dhani Irwanto, Chandra Methodology Adriawan, Jorge André, Team and calendar Joana Santos Next steps USAID April 2, Bill Meade, Farid Siregar, Small Hydropower Mapping project presentation 12:30 pm to Raymond Bona, Jorge USAID ICED project presentation on hydropower mapping and project 2 pm André, Joana Santos development Assessment of the possible points of cooperation ADB April 3, Bagus Mundiatoro, Joy Small Hydropower Mapping project presentation 8 am to 9 am Lopes, Chandra Adriawan, Assess ADB work on hydropower Jorge André, Joana Santos PLN – DivEBT April 7, Sutiyo Siswanto, Rois Status report 10 am to Ahmad Hanafi, Dhruva Operation of the data collection task 11:30pm Sahai, Chandra Adriawan, Jorge André, Joana Santos JICA April 7, Juraku Masahiro, Chandra Small Hydropower mapping project presentation 2 pm to 3 pm Adriawan, Jorge André, Assess JICA work on hydropower Joana Santos GIZ April 8, Amalia Suryani, Erwina CONSULTANT presentation 2 pm to 3 pm Darmajanti, Ricky ESMAP framework for Small Hydropower Ariwibowo, Chandra Methodology Adriawan, Jorge André Calendar Present day CastleRock April 14, Iwan Adhisaputra CONSULTANT presentation 3 pm to 4 pm Warintoko, Chandra ESMAP framework for Small Hydropower Adriawan, Joana Santos Methodology Calendar Present day PLN – IT April 16 Achmad Devi Afianto Brief presentation of the project Infrastructure Rois Ahmad Hanafi Possible requirements and options for the Small Hydropower Joana Santos Mapping project related to the IT department 9 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT Table 3.2 – Requested data. Requested Data Document/Info Source Collected Data (Y/N) Format Alternative available data Gaps between requested and available data at date Hydropower Masterplans JICA study 1999 – Map info PLN N MapInfo No alternative available database Project for the Master Plan JICA Y PDF No gaps identified. Data collected Study of Hydropower Development in Indonesia List of hydropower PLN list of IPP’s request PLN N xls, kml No alternative available This is the main source of data, according to ToR in order to projects PLN development projects PLN N xls, kml No alternative available accomplish the assignment RUPTL PLN Y pdf The planned power for the upcoming years is stated in the RUPTL. After an analysis of the document, the location of the hydropower and small hydropower plants needs to be specified Existing Dams List and characteristics of Department of Water Resources (Ministry N IHC Database and public information This database will allows as to have more certain in the existing dams, with of Public Works) characteristics of the existing dams geographical information Existing Hydropower RUPTL PLN Y The existing hydropower plants are stated in the RUPTL. After an Plants analysis of the document, the location of the hydropower and small hydropower plants needs to be specified PLN database PLN N No alternative available Temporal datasets Stream gauge stations Department of Water Resources (Ministry N xls The global datasets may provide an alternative, If no stream gauge stations are provided, it won’t even be possible of Public Works) but the quality of information lowers the to assess the uncertainty and error of the global datasets in quality of the outcomes Indonesia Meteorological stations Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan N xls The global datasets may provide an alternative, If no meteorological stations are provided, it won’t even be possible Geofisika (BMKG) but the quality of information lowers the to assess the uncertainty and error of the global datasets in quality of the outcomes Indonesia Spatial datasets Electrical grid PLN N Vector format No alternative available The location of all 20 kV and above substations and transmission lines are a requirement Forest areas Ministry of Forestry (MoFo) N Vector format Public data from Forest areas in WMS format The public data is a comprehensive source, but vector format will from the MoFo improve the workability of this information Protected areas Ministry of Environment N Vector format World Database on Protected Areas The global dataset is a comprehensive source, but the involvement of the competent authority promotes the acceptance of the study findings Land use GlobCover Y Raster Format GlobCover released a more recent Land Cover, from 2010, than the available in the MoFo database (Landsat 2000). It is considered that the information of GlobCover is sufficient for the execution of the assignment Isohyets Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan N Raster or vector Global datasets with mean rainfall (worldclim, The information of worldclim will present errors, but is readily Geofisika (BMKG) format reanalysis, etc.) available to be incorporated in the project. If some ground stations are provided to assess the error of the Worldclim dataset related to ground measurements, and if the error is acceptable, the Worldclim data may be adopted for a rough characterization of the watershed rainfall Isotherms Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan N Raster or vector Global datasets with mean temperature This information of the worldclim will also present errors, and this Geofisika (BMKG) format (worldclim, reanalysis, etc.) error should be assessed with the ground measurements, and if the error is acceptable, adopted to a rough country characterization. Digital Elevation Model (BIG) PLN N Raster format Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) or BIG is a smaller scale DEM, improving the outcomes in relation with Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and the big scale DEMS as SRTM and ASTER Reflection Radiometer (ASTER). 10 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT Requested Data Document/Info Source Collected Data (Y/N) Format Alternative available data Gaps between requested and available data at date Spatial datasets Road and Railroad network PLN N Vector format Vector Map Level O (VMAPO) The information in VMAP0 is not detailed, but given the scope of the work, roads and rails may not be a strong restriction to hydropower development. Therefore, if no official or local information is available, this global dataset may be adopted for the project Land property PLN N Vector format No alternative available Contour data Badan Informasi Geospasial (BIG) N Vector format Derived from DEM The quality of the DEM will affect in the quality of the contours derived from them. Official information is more reliable. Streams and rivers N Vector format Derived from DEM The quality of the DEM will affect in the quality of the streams and rivers derived from them. Official information is reliable. Administrative boundaries N Vector format Global Administrative Areas (GADM), version The global dataset is a comprehensive source, but the involvement 2.0, January 2012 of the competent authority will supports the authenticity of the information Topographic maps N Raster format No alternative available Settlements and population Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) or N Vector format Global databases - Vector Map Level O The information of the parallel contract for Geospatial Badan Informasi Geospasial (BIG) (VMAPO) or Geonet names server (GNS) electrification permits a single and unified assessment of the load demand. The global dataset does not allow inferring the population, though it is useful to find locations and populated places. The source information if probably from BIG/BPS. It was acquired by PLN for the parallel contract and is required in this project. Legal framework Environmental legislation Government of Indonesia issued Y Pdf - - Government Regulation No. 27 of 2012 State Ministry of Environment Decree Y Pdf - - No.11/2006 Forestry legislation Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 41 of Y Pdf - - 1999 Forestry Minister Regulation No.16 of Y Pdf - - 2014 Dam licensing and Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 2 of Y Pdf - - hydropower process 2012 description Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 7 of y Pdf - - 2004 11 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT 3.3 ASSESSMENT OF THE COLLECTED DATA 3.3.1 DAMS AND HYDROPOWER PROJECTS IN OPERATION AND PLANNED The current and future energy situations were assessed from the Rancana Usaha Penyediann Tenaga Listrik 2013-2022 (RUPTL). This report contains the current situation and the future projects for each province. The CONSULTANT has analyzed the RUPTL, encountering difficulties in some systems that don´t separate their generated energy per type. The future projects were also analyzed, allowing extrapolating the future energy situation. In the next figures the current and future situation per region is represented considering that every proposed project in RUPTL is built and no power plant was decommissioned. Hydropower Others Hydropower Others 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.9 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 11.0 1.2 3.2 5.9 5.5 20.5 5.2 0.4 4.0 89.7 1.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.9 0.4 0.2 2.5 5.8 1.9 54.8 40.1 29.4 Papua Maluku Kalimantan Jawa-Bali NTB NTT Sumatera Total Sulawesi Papua Barat Maluku Utara Kalimantan Papua Maluku Jawa-Bali NTB Sumatera NTT Total Sulawesi Papua Barat Maluku Utara Figure 3.1 - Existing hydropower capacity and total capacity Figure 3.2 - Future hydropower capacity and total capacity per region (GW), RUPTL. per region (GW), RUPTL. The current situation of future hydropower projects with PPA agreements in PLN is present in Figure 3.3 12 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT Terminated Potential Proposal Studies PPA process without location Funding process with location Procurement Construction Operation 0 50 100 150 200 Number of PPA´s Figure 3.3 - Future hydropower projects with PPA agreements. Also from analyzing the RUPTL, the different types of hydropower projects per region were assessed, along with the total generation capacity in each region. For this purpose, the following definition is considered:  mini hydro, MHP – under 1 MW;  small hydro, SHP – under 10 MW;  large hydro, LHP – above 10 MW;  pumped-storage hydro, PS – any capacity. This analysis is showed in Figure 3.4 and Figure 3.5. Figure 3.4 - Existing hydropower capacity per type and region (RUPTL data, CONSULTANT analysis). 13 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT Figure 3.5 - Future hydropower capacity per type and region (RUPTL data, CONSULTANT analysis). Since it is not possible to collect the coordinates of the existing hydropower plants from the RUPTL, their location was obtained internally using some of the CONSULTANT members own previous experience on the subject (from the self-built IHC ongoing database: http://www.indonesia- hydro.com/knowledge_base). From this correspondence some capacity conflicts were encountered and other plants were identified, as presented in Figure 3.6. Figure 3.6 - Hydropower plants in operation (CONSULTANT analysis). 14 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT Annex IV presents all of the identified plants. A few plants have no correspondence with the mentioned IHC database, as presented in Table 3.3, thus their location remains unknown Table 3.3 – RUPTL hydropower projects with unknown location. Province Name Capacity (MW) Observation Jawa Timur Madiun 8.1 Location unknown. This project appears under Jawa Timur and Jawa Tengah provinces in Jawa Tengah Selorejo 1.4 the RUPTL. Only the Jawa Timur project was located. Currently under construction. Mangani 1.2 Location unknown. Sumatera Barat Currently under construction. Napal Melintang 0.6 Location unknown. Sumatera Utara Pandan 7.6 Location unknown. On the other hand, some of the projects referred in the IHC database and identified using satellite image are not included in the RUPTL (presented in Table 3.4). The status of this hydropower plants will be confirmed during the execution of the project1. Table 3.4 – Identified hydropower plants without RUPTL correspondence. Province Name Capacity (MW) Aceh Angkup 0.4 Gorontalo Mongango 1.2 Jawa Barat Cijampang 1.1 Cijedil 0.7 Cikaso 5.7 Curug 6.8 Malabar 3.0 Talun 0.2 Jawa Timur Ampelgading 10.0 Giringan 3.2 Golang 2.7 Ngebel 2.2 Wonorejo 6.5 1 Some of the hydropower projects on the list are known to not be selling to PLN, which may be the reason for not to be in the RUPTL, namely Angkup, Malabar, Talun, Balambano (nickel Company), Kareve (nickel Company), Larona (nickel Company), Batubsuk (cement factory), Bahbolon (owned) and Tangga (aluminum company). TULIS is currently not in operation due to social problems. 15 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT Province Name Capacity (MW) Jawa Tengah Adipasir 3 0.3 Kincang 0.3 Plumbungan 1.6 Rakit 0.4 Sigebang 0.8 Singgi 0.2 Siteki 1.2 Tapen 0.8 Tulis 14.0 NTB Mamak 0.4 Pengga 0.4 NTT Lapopu 1.6 Lokomboro 1 1.0 Lokomboro 2 0.4 Ndungga 2.0 Papua Sinakma 0.3 Walesi 2.9 Sulawesi Barat Bonehau 4.0 Sulawesi Selatan Balambano 130.0 Bungin 3.0 Karebe 140.0 Larona 165.0 Ranteballa 3.3 Sulawesi Tengah Hanga-hanga 2.0 Sulawesi Tenggara Mikuasi 0.5 Rongi 0.8 Sambilambo 5.0 Wining 1.6 Sulawesi Utara Lobong 1.6 Mobuya 3.0 Sulawesi Utara Poigar 1 2.4 Tanggari 1 17.2 Tanggari 2 19.0 Tonsealama 14.4 Sumatera Barat Batubusuk (Indarung) 4.7 Sumatera Utara Bahbolon 2.5 Kombih 1 3.0 Kombih 2 3.0 Tangga 318.0 After this assessment the CONSULTANT considers that it is of great importance to obtain the maximum official information possible from PLN not only on future projects, but even on existing ones. 16 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT 3.3.2 HYDROLOGICAL DATA Hydrological and meteorological data was requested, but only meteorological data was collected. At the moment, data from stations registered to the WMO was downloaded and the Rainfall Atlas of Indonesia was provided. Data collected still needs treatments and quality studies. So far, the missing and faulty data of WMO registered stations was obtained2. An example of the output obtained for some stations is presented in Figure 3.7 where the number of daily data per month missing was obtained. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1958 3 3 1 2 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1962 31 28 31 30 14 30 31 31 30 19 14 14 1959 13 8 5 3 6 2 14 7 9 8 13 7 1963 15 15 19 9 26 23 21 28 24 28 25 28 1960 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11 1 1964 29 26 25 22 26 27 28 30 26 26 18 28 1961 0 0 1 1 3 4 0 0 30 31 0 0 1965 29 19 19 20 22 21 27 24 19 31 28 31 1962 1 0 3 1 1 4 2 29 30 31 30 31 1966 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1963 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1967 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1964 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1968 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1965 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1969 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1966 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1970 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1967 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1971 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1968 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1972 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1969 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1973 18 13 21 14 19 8 16 7 6 2 13 17 1970 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1974 11 11 6 8 3 3 9 11 5 4 1 3 1971 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1975 15 10 15 13 8 7 12 6 13 13 14 17 1972 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1976 17 11 13 8 5 1 5 8 2 3 2 7 1973 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1977 3 4 3 2 2 0 1 1 2 1 1 1 1974 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1978 3 4 3 3 2 3 6 2 2 2 7 3 1975 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1979 1 1 0 0 1 7 3 0 0 1 0 2 1976 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 1980 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 3 2 5 1 4 1977 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 25 18 23 19 1981 5 0 1 5 4 1 5 8 3 3 5 0 1978 12 11 22 25 23 18 23 10 16 9 11 14 1982 2 3 2 2 3 2 1 0 1 4 3 1 1979 9 3 7 19 31 23 17 14 5 10 27 26 1983 2 0 1 9 2 3 1 4 1 4 0 2 1980 14 16 10 13 23 30 31 30 25 21 13 21 1984 8 7 1 2 3 1 1 2 9 5 5 7 1981 23 19 28 25 25 18 25 25 24 27 30 29 1985 2 2 6 21 15 10 11 1 4 3 4 8 1982 26 21 17 15 24 13 16 9 7 14 5 4 1986 5 12 12 3 20 18 11 8 8 2 4 13 1983 5 4 2 13 4 8 2 6 6 12 2 3 1987 22 21 15 13 15 6 15 12 12 5 8 10 1984 13 21 17 3 3 2 6 0 8 7 3 5 1988 6 10 11 6 4 3 2 6 0 7 5 0 1985 10 1 10 21 2 14 8 3 2 3 2 2 1989 1 7 5 15 17 9 5 17 3 17 20 21 1986 3 7 5 4 9 3 4 1 3 0 4 4 1990 24 10 18 25 28 20 16 22 30 28 23 25 1987 11 4 6 3 8 7 14 11 6 6 7 4 1991 26 23 24 30 31 30 31 27 25 22 28 22 1988 11 17 7 1 2 4 2 5 10 7 8 8 1992 28 23 21 28 31 24 22 24 16 5 5 13 1989 2 12 15 26 16 8 14 21 19 20 21 27 1993 13 0 0 0 3 5 3 0 6 9 5 2 1990 20 23 29 30 26 21 17 26 30 29 25 27 1994 1 2 4 3 1 5 7 0 3 0 0 6 1991 29 24 31 30 29 30 31 31 27 30 28 31 1995 1 0 8 4 0 2 4 1 1 0 1 13 1992 31 28 31 29 29 29 31 30 23 11 1 4 1996 24 21 0 5 1 2 4 6 0 1 1 15 1993 14 6 15 6 4 3 11 5 5 7 5 1 1997 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 7 11 1994 1 0 10 1 3 2 0 4 1 0 0 0 1998 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 7 0 9 3 1995 0 0 9 9 1 1 0 0 1 4 1 0 1999 18 10 16 6 6 4 9 5 7 0 0 3 1996 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 2 3 7 3 0 2000 4 2 3 3 1 3 1 4 6 27 2 4 1997 1 0 2 0 5 1 0 3 1 2 0 3 2001 8 14 14 8 8 18 1 6 7 5 7 2 1998 3 1 3 0 3 0 6 6 2 1 6 10 2002 2 3 0 5 3 5 3 1 0 5 2 2 1999 14 8 10 9 9 7 21 24 14 22 16 25 2003 1 2 4 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 2000 21 16 17 11 3 11 7 4 6 3 3 4 2004 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2001 2 3 0 0 9 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 2005 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 2 3 4 1 2002 2 2 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 13 0 1 2006 1 0 2 5 2 4 1 0 0 1 0 2 2003 2 0 2 3 0 1 1 0 4 1 0 0 2007 3 1 3 3 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 2004 9 2 3 11 5 5 5 0 7 0 2 1 2008 4 2 6 6 2 3 2 7 0 0 2 3 2005 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 9 5 5 2009 8 4 5 0 3 3 1 0 0 3 2 3 2006 6 2 3 2 2 1 1 6 4 2 6 3 2007 0 2 3 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 1 2008 1 3 3 4 1 2 2 4 1 8 3 3 2009 2 5 3 0 3 3 1 3 5 0 6 1 Figure 3.7 - Faulty daily data per month in station Sabang/Cut Bau and Palembang/St. M. Ba. 2 The NOAA data was requested. The data for the inception report was obtained from a non-official link, therefore the data needs to be confirmed. 17 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT As it can be seen from Figure 3.7, all the years show faulty data and that can compromise the accurate development of any hydrological study. Likewise, during some inception meetings it was stated that obtaining the ground meteo-climate data in Indonesia is very difficult because only a few stations are in electronic files and most of them are in hard copies and in handwriting3. In the event that no further meteorological data is available for the development of the study, the use of global data sources is proposed, such as the WorldClim project, the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission or the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis. These global data sources allow an estimation of the rainfall and temperature, but it is advisable to have at least some good quality ground stations to assess the global data sources level of accuracy. As an example, Figure 3.8 and Figure 3.9 present the mean annual rainfall and temperature for Indonesia, obtained from data of WorldClim. 3 The CONSULTANT’s own previous experience via IHC confirms the difficulty in assessing hydrological data. 18 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT Figure 3.8 - Mean annual rainfall in Indonesia (WorldClim data, CONSULTANT processing). 19 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT Figure 3.9 – Mean annual temperature in Indonesia (WorldClim data, CONSULTANT processing). 3.3.3 FOREST AREAS The forest areas (Kawasan Hutan), shown in Figure 3.10, were obtained from the database of the Ministry of Forestry (MoFo), in the WebGIS Forestry site (http://webgis.dephut.go.id/), and with a proposed reclassification to be used in the scope of this project as shown in Table 3.5. Table 3.5 - Reclassification of the forest areas from the MoFo. Source Shape Source Classification Reclassification Kawasan Hutan KSA-KPA, TB Conservation Forest KSA-KPA Laut Hutan Lindung Protection Forest Hutan Produksi Production Forest Hutan Produksi Terbatas Hutan Produksi yang dapat dikonversi Areal Penggunaan Lain Non-Forest Area 20 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT Figure 3.10 - Forest areas (MoFo data, CONSULTANT processing). This reclassification (Table 3.5) allows a better understanding of the expected difficulties in development activities from the natural environmental point of view. While for the non-forest areas no difficulties are expected, for the conservation forest areas other exploration than forestry production is forbidden, being the most restricted area. For the other type of forest areas some difficulties are expected, especially in the protection forest, in spite there is no significant difference between the production forest and the protection forest in terms of forest importance in the related regulation. As mentioned before, the forest areas shape can be downloaded from the WebGIS Forestry, but only in a WMS format. For the purpose of this project, spatial operations with this type of data will be essential, but can only be performed with layers in vector format. For that reason, the provision of this shape in vector format from the MoFo is essential in order to obtain the best results possible. The alternative information is a file in Key Markup Language (kml) available in the mentioned website. The scale of this information is less detailed and will lead to errors in the forestry classification. 21 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT 3.3.4 PROTECTED AREAS The protected areas are one of the most important factors in the assessment of a potential site for a hydropower plant. The environmental impact can be a decisive factor and should be first evaluated on a desktop level to avoid any possible conflicts. This information should be from official source to guarantee its authenticity. Alternative information is available in the World Database of Protected Areas (WDPA) and is presented in Figure 3.11. The WDPA is a joint venture between the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP – WCMC) and the International Union for Conservation of Nature – World Commission on Protected Areas (IUCN – WCPA). It is the largest database both on terrestrial and marine protected areas, collected from the international convention secretariats, governments and NGO’s. Figure 3.11 - Protected areas (WPDA data, CONSULTANT processing). 22 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT 3.3.5 LAND COVER The MoFo has a public land cover file, based on the Landsat 2000 (the same base of Globcover2000), presented in Figure 3.12. Figure 3.12 - Land Cover (MoFo data, CONSULTANT processing). The GlobCover was released in a more recent land cover version in 2010, and is presented in Figure 3.13. Considering that the detail and scale of the source information are the same as the official source and that GlobCover is more recent and updated, the latter is proposed to be adopted in the project. 23 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT Figure 3.13 – Land Cover (GlobCover 2010 data, GESTO processing). 3.3.6 LAND PROPERTY Land property is one of the issues that the CONSULTANT shall evaluate along the project, trying to better understand how to grant/own land for the implementation of hydropower plants and how the ownership of land may impact on project delays or its feasibility. For this sake, the mapping of different types of ownership or concession of land would be useful, though the CONSULTANT is not aware if such information is available. 3.3.7 ROAD AND RAILROAD NETWORK The road and railroad network were obtained from the Vector Map (VMAP), a vector-based collection of Geographic Information System (GIS) data about Earth at various levels of detail. For the current purpose the level used was level 0 (low resolution), which has global coverage at public domain. 24 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT Figure 3.14 - Road and rails network (VMAP data, CONSULTANT processing). 3.3.8 MORPHOLOGICAL DATA Contour data, as well as river and streams, may be derived from a Digital Elevation Model (DEM). Since the scope of work is small hydropower, the DEM resolution should be as refined as possible, especially in the focus regions of Sulawesi, NTT, Maluku and Maluku Utara. During the Inception Mission, it was mentioned that PLN currently possesses BIG data in the regions inside the scope of work of the parallel contract on Geospatial Electrification Planning. However, it was not possible to assess the type of information and scale. 25 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT The CONSULTANT strongly advises PLN regarding the acquisition of this type of data to be included in the database. The alternative datasets for this purpose are the global digital elevation dataset provided by the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), presented in Figure 3.15, the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer4 (ASTER). Figure 3.15 - Digital global elevation data (SRTM data, CONSULTANT processing). The comparison between these alternative datasets is presented in Table 3.6. 4 ASTER GDEM is a product of METI and NASA. 26 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT Table 3.6 - Comparison between alternative DEM datasets. ASTERGDEM SRTM Data source ASTER Space shuttle radar Generation and METI/NASA NASA/USGS distribution V1 ~2003 V1 Release year ~2011 V2 ~2007 V4.1 Data acquisition 2000 ~ ongoing 11 days (in 2000) period DEM resolution 30m 90m DEM accuracy 7~14m 10m (stdev.) 83 degrees north ~ 83 degrees 60 degrees north ~ 56 degrees DEM coverage south south Areas with no ASTER data due Area of Topographically steep area to constant cloud cover missing data (due to radar characteristics) (supplied by other DEM) The main problem with the use of big scale DEMs for SHP assessment may be summarized in two issues: 1) The larger the pixel, the worst the costs and hydraulic head estimation; 2) The stream network derived from flow accumulation procedures will present some deviations, sometimes getting the wrong path. This is more prone in big scales. Nevertheless, from the hydropower experience in the territory it is known that the mean error of SRTM and ASTER is usually less than 5%, with an impact in in the range of 1-2% in the watershed calculation. 3.3.9 ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES The administrative boundaries are crucial to extract location information for the projects and to correctly identify the local entities to be consulted. This information should be officially provided. If this is not the case, the GADM database of Global Administrative Areas (version 2.0, January 2012) may be used. The available administrative divisions for Indonesia are: country, provinces and Regencies/Cities. 27 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT Figure 3.16 - Administrative divisions, regency and city level (GADM data, GESTO processing). 3.3.10 SETTLEMENTS AND POPULATION The settlements and population information are being analyzed and processed in the parallel contract for Geospatial Electrification Planning. This information of population, respective loads, grid and mini- grids aggregation is crucial for the first design approach for the capacity of the hydropower project. The hydropower project levelized cost of electricity is strongly dependent on its capacity. For the same site, all the capacities below the optimum balance between capacity and resource will result in higher generation costs. Nevertheless, the capacity is sometimes limited not by resource but by demand load side. For this reason, the population, expected loads (as the forecasts in the parallel contract) and the aggregated load are crucial information for the adaptation of the hydropower potential to the grid and population needs. For this sake, express written authorization should be provided in order to request this information to the consultants performing the parallel contract (Earth Institute). 28 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT At this stage, available data was collected from the global data sources:  Vector Map Level 0 (VMAP0)  Geonet names server (GNS) An example of the information obtained from the GNS is displayed in the figure below, where the settlements of the Manggarrai regency of NTT region are geo-referenced. Figure 3.17 - Settlements in Manggarai regency, NTT (GNS data, GESTO analysis). It should be noted that this information is not official and population is not available. It is therefore crucial that the information from the parallel contract is provided. 29 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT 3.3.11 TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS Topographic maps display most of the natural and man-made elements in the country, and can be obtained from the BIG database. In the vector database, the information is divided into 7 themes:  Theme 1: Land Cover: land cover areas such as forests, fields and settlements;  Theme 2: Hydrography: include water elements such as rivers, lakes and coastlines;  Theme 3: Topography: high-level data such as contours;  Theme 4: Building: buildings, houses and office buildings;  Theme 5: Transportation and Utilities: roads, railways, transmission wires and bridges;  Theme 6: Administrative divisions: the state border, provinces, regencies/cities, townships and villages;  Theme 7: Toponyms: geographic names such as the island's name, the name of the strait and the name of the mountain. There’s also cartograms, by regions, with the data availability and the year of manufacture by map scale 1:250 000, 1:50 000, 1:25 000 and 1:10 000, presented in Figure 3.18. Figure 3.18 - BIG Cartograms by region. 30 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT The CONSULTANT considers that the results of this project are very dependent on the availability of this information, requesting that all data under PLN should be provided. All maps will be important for this project, but taking into account the cost/benefit of this information, the CONSULTANT considers that at least the topographic maps at the 1:250 000 scale should be part of the database, in raster format if possible. In terms of vector layers, all the data is of great interest to the project and to compose a full database for the future. In terms of strict requirements for the analysis to be performed, the information is just mandatory for the regions of NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi, namely the Theme 2 and 3, for the lower available scales at the locations where hydropower projects were identified, along with the topographic map in raster format. Raster formats are not stated in the BIG product list, but it is usually a standard. It may also be obtained from the geo-referencing of the print version of the topographical maps after high quality scanning. 31 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT 4 THE SMALL HYDROPOWER IN INDONESIA AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL PLANNING In this chapter we propose the methodology to be followed in the project Small Hydropower in Indonesia and Improved Geospatial Planning. The legal framework and the identified stakeholders allow a better understanding of the scope of the project, shaping the originally proposed methodology for improved results. For the challenges identified during the Inception Mission, changes to the preliminary methodology are proposed, resulting in the final methodology proposal, milestones and schedule. 4.1 THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK 4.1.1 ELECTRICITY SECTOR The Electricity sector is regulated by the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (“MoEMR”) and its sub-agencies – The Directorate of General Electricity and Energy Utilization and the Directorate General of Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation. According to the Electricity Law No. 30/2009, electricity development shall aim to guarantee the availability of power at adequate quantity, good quality, and reasonable price to improve public welfare and prosperity in a just and distributive manner as well as to realize sustainable development. Energy policy objectives are based on the Presidential Decree No. 5 of 2006 on National Energy Policy (Kebijakan Energi Nasional – KEN) and its Blueprint of National Energy Management 2005-2025 (Pengelolaan Energi Nasional – PEN). The 2005-2025 National Energy Blueprint specifies 500 MW on grid and 330 MW off grid targets for small scale hydropower energy production. The MoEMR is responsible for developing the electricity master plan (RUKN – Rencana Umum Ketenagalistrikan Nasional) which sets out, amongst other things, a ten year estimate of the power demand and supply, the investment and funding policy, and the approach to the utilization of new and renewable energy resources. RUKN is reviewed annually and is the source for the Electrification Development Program (RUPTL – Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik) and Regional General Plan of Electricity (RUKD – Rencana Umum Ketenagalistrikan Daerah). The current RUKN is for the period 2012-2031. The Electrification Development Program (RUPTL) constitutes the official ten year power development plan prepared by PLN, approved by MoEMR. The RUPTL contains demand forecasts, future expansion plans, energy production, and fuel requirements and indicated which projects will be developed by PLN and IPP investors. As RUKN, RUPTL is also reviewed annually. The current RUPLT is for the decade 2013- 2022. 32 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT The key figures from RUPTL regarding Small Hydropower in Indonesia are summarized in Table 4.1, the list of the hydropower projects present in the document are in Annex IV and V. Table 4.1 - Summary of hydro potential. (Unit: MW) Existing hydro Hydro projects Hydro Capacity Region capacity 2013 in RUPTL as of 2022 Jawa-Bali 2536 2698 5234 Kalimantan 32 248 280 Maluku 0 96 96 Maluku Utara 0 5 5 NTB 0 51 51 NTT 0 31 31 Papua 0 106 106 Papua Barat 0 64 64 Sulawesi 361 1431 1792 Sumatera 1139 2014 3153 Total 4068 6744 10812 From analyzing the RUPTL, one may conclude that for the next 10 years a small hydropower development of 710.6 MW is expected. The total distribution of this development per region is presented in Table 4.2. Table 4.2 - Small Hydro Projects Plan for 2013-2022 (RUPTL). Region SHP Capacity (MW) Jawa-Bali 352.1 Sumatera 168.0 Sulawesi 53.1 Kalimantan 0.0 NTB 6.9 Papua 36.1 NTT 30.9 Maluku 41.5 Papua Barat 17.1 Maluku Utara 5.0 Total 710.6 The bidding process for new capacity is generally on a competitive basis, in line with the private sector participation according to Perpres No. 67/2005 and amended by Perpres No. 13/2010. However, for the renewable energy projects, Direct Appointment is a common practice in the sector. The process usually undertaken for small hydro IPP direct appointment method is presented in Figure 4.1. 33 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT DIRECT APPOINTMENT METHOD PLTM IPP ≤ 10 MW PLN MESDM DEVELOPER PLN PUSAT REGION (MEMR) DIV EBT PROPOSAL - KKO , KKF, AR - PRE QUALIFICATION DIRECT APPOINTMENT PERMIT PROPOSAL DATA EVALUATION DIRECT APPOINTMENT PERMIT PROPOSAL DIRECT APPOINTMENT PERMIT REQUEST PUBLIC ELECTRICITY PROVIDER DIRECT APPOINTMENT SEND TO PLN REGION PERMIT (IUPTL) TEMPORARY A PUBLIC ELECTRICITY PROVIDER PERMIT (IUPTL) TEMPORARY A PRICE EVALUATION Yes FIT 04 / 2012 No PRICE ESTIMATION NEGOTIATION PRICE PROPOSAL PICE PROPOSAL PRICE APPROVAL SENT TO PLN REGION No GM AUTHORITY BOD PRINCIPAL PERMIT Yes PPA FC REQUEST PUBLIC ELECTRICITY PROVIDER PERMIT (IUPTL) COMMERCIAL OPERTION DATE (COD) Figure 4.1 – Flowchart for direct appointment method for Small Hydropower. 34 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT The developer submits its proposal to the PLN region office for Pre-qualification with its operational and financial feasibility study and risk assessment. The PLN region sends the direct appointment permit proposal to the PLN central office (PLN Pusat), whom through Div-EBT makes a data evaluation and forwards the direct appointment permit proposal to the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources for his approval. If direct appointment permit is approved, the PLN region starts the process of Price Evaluation. Currently the small hydropower may benefit from the feed-in tariff. In that case, the process avoids the price negotiation and runs directly to approval, from the region or the Board of Directors, depending on the amount of investment. Ministerial Regulation No 04/2012 on Electricity Purchase from Small and Medium Scale Renewable Energy and Excess Power introduces new differentiated feed-in tariff levels in Indonesia. Tariff levels are differentiated depending on the installation type, its location and voltage of grid interconnection. The feed in tariffs were recently updated by the Ministerial Regulation No 12/2014. Tariffs are presented in Table 4.35 and valid for the PPA during a period of 20 years after the commercial operation date. Table 4.3 - Feed-in tariff levels. Feed-in tariff level in Rp/kWh Territorial Factor Voltage Wilayah (F) Year 1 to 8 Year 9 to 20 Java, Bali, and Madura 1.00 Sumatra 1.10 Medium Borneo and Sulawesi 1.20 1075 x F 750 x F (Up to 10 MW) West Nusa Tenggara and East Nusa Tenggara 1.25 Maluku and North Maluku 1.30 Papua and West Papua 1.60 Java, Bali, and Madura 1.00 Sumatra 1.10 Low Borneo and Sulawesi 1.20 1270 x F 770 x F (Up to 250 kW) West Nusa Tenggara and East Nusa Tenggara 1.25 Maluku and North Maluku 1.30 Papua and West Papua 1.60 5 During the preparation of this report, feed-in tariff increase were reported for small hydro. The notices pointed to a raise up to 1075 Rp/kWh. This information needs to be confirmed. 35 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT After the financial close of the PPA, the developer must request an Electricity Business License (IUPTL --- Izin Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik). A business license must be granted before an entity can supply electrical power or run an electrical power-supporting business. In this sense, a business license to supply electricity for public use is required. The IUPTL must be required by the IPP and it is issued by the Central Government, in the case the IPP intends to sell power to PLN (already an owner of an IUPTL). 4.1.2 OTHER REQUIRED LICENSES Apart from the licenses and requirements from the electric sector, the additional required licenses for the small hydropower development in Indonesia are long. From the meetings held during the Inception Mission, it was mentioned that all the required processes, the different length, agencies, the different concessional durations are considered obstacles to hydropower development. The list of the identified official licenses is presented in Table 4.4. Table 4.4 – Other required licenses. Required Licenses Prinsip Pemakain Sumber Daya Air Water resources use license Izin Pemanfaatan Air Permukaan (SIPAP) Surface water use license Izin Mendirikan Bangunan (IMB) Building construction permit Izin Pelaksanaan Konstruksi Construction implementation license (other than IMB) on the river is required. Izin Gangguan (HO) Disturbance permit Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan (UKL) Environmental licenses Upaya Pemantauan Lingkungan (UPL) Angka Pengenal Importir Importer identification number Izin Pemakaian Kawasan Hutan Forest Permit Izin Lokasi Local permit The Building construction permits, Disturbance permit, Water resources use licenses and the importer identification number were never mentioned in the meetings, therefore, it may be assumed that the local permit, environmental and forest licenses are the most critical licensing processes, and are best described in the following subchapters. 4.1.3 LOCAL PERMIT The process of establishing a SHP begins properly with the request for a Local Permit (Izin Lokasi). This permit grants an applicant the option to develop a SHP within a given area, subject to time constraints and other conditions. The process is regulated by State Land Agency Decree 2 of 1999 and more recently by Government Regulation 15/2010 concerning the implementation of spatial planning. 36 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT An application for a Local Permit is made to the local government by proposing the target area and outlining a development plan. The term of a Local Permit is limited by the target area in question: areas of up to 25 ha are given a one-year permit; areas between 25 and 50 ha are given a two-year permit; areas over 50 ha are given three-year permits. Within this time the company must obtain tenure over a minimum of 51% of the target area. If land acquisition has reached more than 51% of the area of then an extension may be granted for a further one year. If land acquisition of at least 50% cannot be completed within the time, the land can be released to another company or reduced and the remainder made available to other companies. The Local Permit process has no direct legal obligation to consider environmental impact, as that is covered by the processes of forest conversion and management activities. As Local Permit is simply an option on an area of land, there is also little indirect interaction with environmental legislation. 4.1.4 ENVIRONMENTAL ADMINISTRATION On February 23, 2012, the Government of Indonesia issued Government Regulation No. 27 of 2012 regarding Environmental Permits (“GR 27/2012”). GR 27/2012 is an implementing regulation of the recent 2009 Environmental Law (Law No. 32 of 2009) and revokes Government Regulation No. 27 of 1999 (“GR 27/1999”) which previously regulated two types of environmental reporting and compliance for companies operating in Indonesia: an Environmental Impact Analysis Report (“AMDAL”) and an Environmental Management/Monitoring Efforts Report (“UKL – UPL”). The aim of GR 27/2012 is to provide greater legal certainty for businesses in terms of environmental licensing while ensuring the protection and management of the natural environment. The key requirement of the new regulation is the Environmental Permit. The idea for an Environmental Permit was initially introduced by the 2009 Environmental Law but has not been implemented until now. In brief, any business which currently requires either an AMDAL or an UKL-UPL now also requires an Environmental Permit. The environmental permit is also a requirement for obtaining a business permit. In the event the Environmental Permit is revoked, the business permit will also be cancelled. Under GR 27/2012, companies must still apply for and receive approval of an AMDAL or UKL – UPL. As an additional requirement, companies must now also apply for an Environmental Permit. Both the Environmental Permit and approval of an AMDAL or UKL – UPL will be issued on the same day. An Environmental Permit shall report the requirements and obligations which have been stated in the approval of the AMDAL or UKL – UPL. Additional requirements may be added as stipulated by the issuing authority (e.g. Minister of Environmental Affairs, Governors, or Regents/Mayors). 37 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT The type of business plans and/or activities that must have an AMDAL are indicated in State Ministry of Environment Regulation No.11/2006. Table 4.5 presents those related with electricity and energy utilization. Table 4.5 - Electricity and energy utilization activities needed to conduct an AMDAL. NO ACTIVITY SCALE 1 Construction of the transmission network > 150 kV 2 Development ≥ 100 MW a. PLTD / Gas Power Plant / Power Plant / Combined Cycle (in one location) Power Plant b. Development PLTP (geothermal development) ≥ 55 MW c. Hydroelectric Development by: - High dam, or ≥ 15 m - Areas of inundation, or ≥ 200 ha - Installed capacity ≥ 50 MW d. Construction of power plants from other species (such as: OTEC (Ocean Thermal Energy Conservation), Solar, Wind, ≥ 10 MW Biomass, Peat, etc.). In terms of small hydropower (under 10 MW), the developments under 15 m and with inundation reservoir area under 200 ha will not need to conduct AMDAL. This will allow to effectively speed-up the implementation of the SHP projects, as the procedures for AMDAL can be very time consuming. Figure 4.2 describes the AMDAL procedures based on the GR 27/2012. According to the State Ministry of Environment Decree No.8/2006 the necessary documents for the AMDAL are: 1) Terms of References Framework for Environmental Impact Analysis (KA-ANDAL)  KA-ANDAL is prepared for framing the scope and depth of Environmental Impact Analysis (ANDAL). 2) Environmental Impact Analysis (ANDAL)  ANDAL describes expected significant environmental impacts, evaluation of the impacts including selection of alternative and preparation of appropriate environmental mitigation measures in terms of implementation of the proposed project. 3) Environmental Management Plan (RKL)  RKL statements environmental management approaches for mitigating environmental negative impacts forecasted in ANDAL. 4) Environmental Monitoring Plan (RPL)  RPL examines the effectiveness of proposed environmental management plan. 38 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT Figure 4.2 - Scheme of the AMDAL procedures. 39 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT The AMDAL committee is established to review the AK-ANDAL, ANDAL, RKL and RPL for the proposed project. The Committee will be established by approval authorities such as Minister of Environment, Governor and Mayer decided depending on the size of the proposed project. According to GR 27/2012, the AMDAL committee consists of following members.  Representative from environmental institution;  Representative from technical institution;  Expert in the kind of effort and/or activity studied;  Expert in the impacts that may occur from effort and/or activity studied;  Representative from community to be effected by the impact; and  Representative from Non-Governmental Environmental Organization. The AMDAL committee is also classified into the central, provincial and district depending on the category and size of the proposed project. The State Ministry of Environment Decree No.5/2008 indicates the responsible AMDAL committee for each category and/or size of the proposed project as follows:  Central AMDAL Committee: assess business and / or activities located in more than one area of the province; in the territory dispute with another country;  Provincial AMDAL Committee: assess business and / or activities located in more than one district / city and/or in cross-district / city; and  District AMDAL Committee: assess business and / or activities located in single district. An environmental management efforts and environment monitoring efforts (UKL-UPL) is required for projects or activities smaller than those requiring an AMDAL. In principle, the AMDAL is a study of the potential significant impact of the proposed business activity on the environment, while the UKL-UPL covers monitoring and management efforts undertaken for business activities which are not likely to have significant impact on the environment. Unlike AMDAL, a UKL-UPL is not a formal certificate, and does not include conditions requiring the applicant to mitigate impacts – it simply requires that a narrower list of environmental impacts be considered in the decision making process. 4.1.5 FORESTRY ADMINISTRATION Forests in Indonesia are classified into three major types depending on the functions and objectives, as production forest (Hutan Produksi), protection forest (Hutan Lindung) and conservation forest (Hutan Konservasi) according to the Article 6 in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 41 of 1999. Production forest is defined as the forest area where production of forest products is sought for. Protection forest is the forest area having the main function to sustain water resources, to prevent flood, erosion, water intrusion and to maintain land fertility. Conservation forest is the forest area which the principle function is to conserve bio-diversity and ecosystem. The Utilization of forest area by development activities beside forestry production is only allowed in production forests and protection forests in accordance with the Article 38 in the Law of the Republic of 40 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT Indonesia No. 41 of 1999. Therefore, it’s not allowed to explore conse rvation forests for other purpose than forestry production. The additional development activities possible beside forestry production are defined in the Republic of Indonesia’s Forestry Minister Regulation No.16 of 2014, and listed in the following table. Table 4.6 - Utilization of forest areas by development activities beside forestry production, P.16/Menhut-II/2014. Forest Classification Development activities  Religious places of worship, cemeteries and spiritual tourist places;  Mining including means and infra-structures of oil, gas, minerals, coal and geothermal;  generation, transmission, and electrical distribution installation, as well as new and renewable energy technologies;  Development of telecommunication networks, radio transmission stations, and Production Forest television relay stations; (Hutan Produksi)  Public roads, highways, and railways;  transportation uncategorized as public transport for manufacturing products transportation;  water resources facilities and infrastructures, development of water installation Protected Forest networks, and clean water and/or waste water channeling; (Hutan Lindung)  public facilities;  forestry related industries;  defense and security;  infrastructure supporting public safety;  temporary shelter places for natural disaster victims;  Agriculture for food security; or  Agriculture for energy security. 4.2 IDENTIFIED STAKEHOLDERS During the Inception Mission the following major stakeholders for the development of SHP in Indonesia were identified:  PLN  Commercial financing institutions  Cooperation Agencies  Engineering Consultants  Independent Power Producers (IPP)  Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources  Ministry of Public Works  Ministry of Forestry  Ministry of Environment  Local governments 41 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT PLN is responsible for the majority of Indonesia’s electricity generation and has the exclusive powers in relation to transmission, distribution and supply of electricity to the public. PLN is regulated and supervised by the MoEMR, the Ministry of State Owned Enterprise, being a State-owned limited Liability Company (or Persero). PLN is a major player as the single off-taker of hydropower electricity production in Indonesia. The economic feasibility of the project is just assessed by the IPP’s and financing institutions, either commercial or cooperation agencies. This is one of the focal problems mentioned by several parts in meetings during the Inception Mission as the delaying factor in hydropower development in Indonesia. The definition of the projects by the IPP’s at the PPA negotiation phase is usually scarce, leading to obstacles in project financing and consequent difficulties in the financial close. In this process, engineering consultants should play a major role and push IPP’s towards the best practices in the project feasibility standards in order to the request of PPA’s. The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources has created the environment for the development of SHP in Indonesia, but several licenses and permits that are bottlenecks for hydropower development depend on external entities, namely the local governments, Ministry of Forestry, Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Public Works. 4.3 IDENTIFIED CHALLENGES The first main challenge identified at the Inception Mission regarding the project execution was the CONSULTANT’s access to crucial requested information and to some of the major stakeholders (namely, relevant public institutions). In order to overcome this challenge, the CONSULTANT proposed a MoU (Annex VI) for data provision with PLN, as the critical data for the project is currently at this institution’s possession, more specifically:  The MapInfo database from the JICA’s studies (from 1999);  The spreadsheet of IPP requests (PLN Pusat);  Access to the IPP feasibility studies in order to retrieve additional information;  Contact IPPs in order to request further information to complete the database;  The 20kV and above grid (shapefile, kml, AutoCAD formats), including lines and substations. The CONSULTANT became aware that sharing the Mapinfo database and the spreadsheet of IPP requests is the most concerning issue for PLN. Nonetheless, these would provide extremely useful information for the project, namely the list of potential hydropower sites and hydrological data. The CONSULTANT understands that the list of potential hydropower sites is sensitive and confidential information, as it could be used by third parties and shut PLN out of project development, as it has happened in the recent past. However, its use within this assignment might concisely protect PLN’s interests if it is integrated in the database and the tool to be developed, allowing PLN to easily identify 42 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT the IPP requests that are in conflict with PLN’s plans on hydropower. If this would be the case, PLN’s mandatory technical review of the project (according to MR No. 12/2014, Article 7, point 2), should be negative and the PPA request won’t proceed. The CONSULTANT fully understands PLN’s concerns and is willing to grant confidentiality to the data provided, but most of all, believes that the tool to be developed will in fact provide PLN a way to protect their plans and efforts. If the aforementioned info is not provided to the CONSULTANT, the task may still be performed and even the said evaluation of conflicts may be possible in the tool to be developed, assuming some losses on the level of detail of the hydropower projects. The CONSULTANT then proposes to digitize the information available on the last assessment of the large hydropower potential (JICA 2011). The lack of hydrological data may be overcome by the use of global datasets, as explained in 3.3.2 - Hydrological data. On another level, the spreadsheet of IPP requests is the main data source to the development of this project, given its main scope is to provide a tool to prioritize SHP and for that the list of projects to be analyzed should be provided. If the list of IPP sites is provided, all tasks related to retrieving data and requesting further information to IPP’s will be worked out with PLN staff as a hands -on-the-job training approach. This will capacitate the staff in the future to request and retrieve the required information to the database. In the event that the list is not provided, the assessment of small hydropower potential to be performed would either yield in the duplication of already performed work (with the additional challenge of accessing other source information) or, alternatively, considerably change the scope of work and timeframe of the current assignment. Given that the former would not be time nor cost effective, for the latter the CONSULTANT proposes the greenfield mapping of the overall hydropower potential of the region (conventional head vs flow approach) followed by the highest potential sites identification and technical and economical assessment of the best projects that may, or may not, coincide with the ones already being licensed. Furthermore, and addressing what eventually seems to be root of the problem, the CONSULTANT would like to highlight that opening the info of the tool to the general public is ultimately PLN and the WB’s decision: the project could be performed as intended only for PLN’s internal access (or with different levels of access defined by PLN for that matter – as presented in sub-section 4.4) and it would still be an extremely valid planning/management tool. In case PLN decides to withhold its hydro mapping data from the GIS database, the CONSULTANT considers it would be a relevant downgrade on the quality and usefulness of the tool, given it is the most significant hydro mapping data available. Considering the 20 kV power lines, this info is required to assess the distance to the medium voltage grid, as an important indicator for the project as long distances may compromise grid connected 43 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT projects feasibility. The CONSULTANT would like to assess a cut-off distance to medium voltage grid (substations) through the generalization of the analysis of several projects in the regions. The projects for grid connection at low voltages are mainly indicated for isolated grids and, therefore, the lack of the geo-referenced lines in the scope of this assignment will be overcome in the Geospatial Electrification Planning parallel contract by the Earth Institute. The second main challenge identified at the Inception Mission regarding the project execution in the eastern regions (Sulawesi, NTT, Maluku and Maluku Utara) and, most particularly, for the field visits to the corresponding wilayahs, is that a visit plan should be closely defined with PLN Pusat, who should not only officially inform local management of the upcoming assignments and thus grant easier access to the required information, but also to request the assignment of local counterparts to accompany the CONSULTANT members in meetings with the local authorities or any other relevant field work. The CONSULTANT considers that until this bridge is created, any local initiative will be ineffective and with limited chances of being successful. Like mentioned before, this project will include the interaction with a parallel contract for Geospatial Electrification Planning. As previously anticipated in the tender, some of the regions where the work will be developed have already been subject of analysis by the parallel contract (NTT, Maluku and Maluku Utara), but the Sulawesi group was not included in the scope of work and will be developed in the parallel contract simultaneously to this assignment. Therefore, the coordination between tasks and the collection of data in the Sulawesi region may suffer some delay compared to other regions. Furthermore in the field of the Geospatial Electrification Planning parallel contract, it is worth mentioning that an added challenge must be considered given the seemingly iterative and interdependent process that will occur between both assignments, given that on one side a consultant will be focused on the generation point of view, whilst on the other side another will be focused on the demand perspective. On a secondary level, it was found during the Inception Mission that one governmental initiative of the MoEMR could benefit from this project, as PLN is currently given the mission to study, with the Ministry of Public Works, the potential hydropower analysis of existing dams with currently non-hydropower purposes. In this sense, the list of all the dams of the country and its characteristics would also be required. 4.4 PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE PRELIMINARY METHODOLOGY In the event that the MoU for data provision is accepted by PLN and all the requested information is granted, the CONSULTANT does not foresee substantive changes to the preliminary methodology. The opposite, however, may occur if the list of IPP requests is not provided. In that case, the hydropower potential assessment and project identification needs to be performed prior to the project 44 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT prioritization in order to form a list of projects (as mentioned in the previous sub-section), at least in the regions of NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi. As such, the decision not to share the list of IPP requests with the CONSULTANT needs to be carefully weighted by the WB and PLN. If PLN opts to not share the Mapinfo database, as some of these projects are already in the public domain, the CONSULTANT believes that from the latest assessment (JICA 2011) the large hydropower potential may be reconstituted into a database. The CONSULTANT will digitize the data into the database (duplication of work not being avoided), assuming losses on the information level of detail. Like mentioned in the previous sub-section, opening the info of the tool to the general public is ultimately PLN’s judgment, considering that the project could be performed with different levels of access or user restrictions defined by PLN for that matter and would still fulfil the project’s objective and be an extremely valid planning/management tool. As shown in Figure 4.3, the GIS database could be performed as originally intended, including all info and data considered sensitive or classified, but the content open to public access could be customized as per P LN’s decision, ranging from total access (only accessible to PLN – DivEBT, per instance) to restricted or no access (to the general public worldwide, per instance). Any intermediate form of access may be arranged. General public • PLN selected depts. • PLN regional offices Level of access • Registered IPPs and companies to be defined • Registered individual users • … PLN - DivEBT Figure 4.3 – The database’s level of access. The current GIS capabilities within the end department (DivEBT) are quite limited. There is one database with no editing procedures (or capacity within the institution) with the identification of the large dams and some additional data that the CONSULTANT will try to incorporate on the future database on small hydro. Therefore, the CONSULTANT will shape the database aiming to promote its usability, instead of performance. A simple solution based on open source software is proposed. 45 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT The open source software we would advise to be adopted is Quantum GIS. The choice of software is also supported by the parallel contract of Geospatial Electrification Planning by the Earth Institute, as they are currently using the same software. The training component of the project will also be adapted for this option rather than the proposed use of ArcGIS platform, or advanced server solutions based on PostGIS. Instead of the proposed training to occur in the end of the assignment, the CONSULTANT proposes to split the training components into two parts. The first part is to take place right after the presentation workshop on Small Hydropower Mapping and the second right after the Final Workshop. By the time of the small hydropower workshop, the National Geographical Database for Small hydropower shall be complete, therefore the capacity building in GIS should take place in order to PLN be able to maintain and update with the new IPP requests. 4.5 FINAL METHODOLOGY PROPOSAL Taking into account all the previous considerations, the final methodology proposal workflow is presented in Figure 4.4, followed by a brief description of the tasks. Figure 4.4 - Workflow with technical approach and final methodology. 46 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT Data collection and production of national small hydro GIS database, review and validation of small hydro potential for NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi Inception (Tasks 1 to 5) Concluded with the approval of the Inception Report and accordance to the final methodology. With the approval of the report and to avoid delays in the execution of the tasks, it is expected the signing of the MoU and the provision of the requested PLN data (spreadsheet with the IPP requests, access to the feasibility studies if needed, the list of PLN hydropower projects and the MapInfo with the potential hydropower). Creating a GIS Database for National Information on SHP Development 6. – Comprehensive Compilation of Existing Info and Data First, compilation of data will focus on PLN’s current database of project development, IPP requests and the MapInfo database that is currently in use within the Div-EBT. This information will be the base information for the GIS Database for National Information on SHP development. The success of the project will be dependent on the provided information by PLN. In that sense, a MoU was proposed and the CONSULTANT is waiting for PLN’s feedback. The proposed MoU is presented in Annex VI. The alternative option for the provision of the information is not readily available. As previously mentioned, the lack of the MapInfo database may be overcome by digitizing the information of the latest Master plan (JICA, 2011) and considering the use of global datasets for hydrological data. However, this assignment focuses on the current list of small hydropower projects PLN holds which, therefore, should be provided to the CONSULTANT, since the available option implies duplication of work and requires a full resource study and site identification in order to compose the list of potential sites. Secondly, information for the characterization of the projects will be collected. This information is particularly useful for the activity. The data collection for each project is intended to be carried out by the CONSULTANT in PLN Pusat, whenever possible with the PLN staff working with the licensing of Small Hydro Power. This will help the staff to understand if there is missing information in the pre-feasibility and feasibility studies and collect the required data to populate the database. On the other hand, the CONSULTANT will be able to understand the required procedures to request additional information. The datasets to be included are referred in the subchapter 0 - . 47 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT For last, some detailed data such as data from meteorological or hydrometric stations, typical daily load curves would improve the review of the Small Hydropower in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi. The preferred method for collecting data will be through PLN’s appointment. Start: Following the approval of the Final Methodology, signing of the MoU and provision of the PLN list of projects and potential Duration of the task: 2 months 7. – Designing a GIS Database on SHP Development A geographical information system (GIS) comprises hardware, software and data for capturing, managing, analyzing and displaying geographically referenced information. The main scope of this task is to design the structure of the data to be used in a geographical information system and populate the database with the collected data. Therefore, the way data is structured should take into account the hardware and software, as well as the current GIS knowledge of the PLN division that will receive and work in the future with the database. Following the Inception Mission it was possible to determine the lack of GIS knowledge within the Div-EBT department. The easiness of use of the database will be the main purpose of the adopted technology. In data to be used in geographical information systems, a distinction should be made between geographical data (location) and attribute data (characterization). The relationship of a feature to other features is implied either from the location or the attributes. Given the extent of the database, geographic coordinates will be preferred over a map projection for the geographical storage of data. The coordinate systems to be adopted will be WGS84 (World Geodetic System). Whenever distance, areas or volumes should be assessed, the proper Universal Transversal Mercator (UTM) will be used to project the data. The GIS database will be formulated in a shapefile format to allow interoperability, taking into consideration the Geospatial Electrification Planning tool. Start: the task may proceed after the provision of the list of projects, but it only can end after all the data collection and digitizing Duration of the task: 3 months 48 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT 8. – Creation of Maps of Findings in SHP Development in Indonesia GIS layouts will be prepared for the creation of maps of finding in the SHP development in Indonesia. The hydropower potential, the location of small hydropower projects, the possible location conflicts between them are some of the possible Maps of Findings to be created. The proper analysis of the collected and digitized data will determine the maps of findings to be presented. Start: the task may start after a preliminary version of the national database is produced Duration of the task: 2 months 9. – Development of Proposal on Hosting and Operation of the GIS Database The proposal on hosting and operation of the GIS database will focus on the hardware, software and training required for the future maintenance and upgrade of the database. Considering the easiness of use a primary goal, the required hardware may be already available for use and the software may be an open source solution. Therefore, the proposal will focus on the next steps and the possible upgrades of the database, considering the advantages and disadvantages of alternative solutions that may be adopted in the future. Start: the task is planned to align its end with the creation of maps of findings in order to close the sub-activity Creating a GIS database for National Information on SHP Development Duration of the task: 1 month SHP Role and Potential in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi 10. Review of SHP role Following a review of the existing power generation and distribution situation in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi, the CONSULTANT will assess the possibility of the medium and small isolated systems to be supplied by SHP solutions and corresponding energy generation alternatives for backup or dry season, thus reviewing the SHP role in these regions. This activity is policy guidance related, but will need to be backed by an initial technical approach. Here, the first relevant interaction with the Geospatial Electrification Planning tool parallel contract (Earth Institute) will take place. 49 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT First, the financial model will be worked together with PLN and the WB trying to make the best common ground with the financial model assumed by the Earth Institute/Castalia in the parallel contract. Two different approaches will be used:  Calculation of the IRR and NPV for the feed-in tariff and regional factor  LCOE of the projects In the islands where the hydropower potential is low, the feed-in tariff may not be sufficient to support the development of a project, but SHP may still be a viable option for electrification comparing to the PV costs assumed in the parallel contract. In this sense, the LCOE of the project will be determined, in order to feed the network planner model in a second iteration. Second, the demand load centers need to be determined for each new hydropower site. Information assessed and developed by the Earth Institute (EI) will be formally requested, so that the EI may disclose the information to the CONSULTANT. This information will include:  The population and load forecast for each settlement point;  The aggregated population and load forecast from the network planner results based on PV;  The report with the assumptions used for each region/island. From the population and demand, the optimization algorithm will work for three base design scenarios:  Base 1 - Optimum design (simple minimization of LCOE of the project);  Base 2 - Optimum design for the aggregated demand in the nearby mini-grid, as resulted from the work from the EI/Castalia;  Base 3 - Optimum design that meets the demand in the main grid in the region/island, as resulted from the work from the EI/Castalia; From the base design scenarios some conclusions may be taken about the grid connection and the off-grid option, but in several cases both choices may be feasible. Some of the inputs of the technical analysis will be derived from the current framework, like the limits on the dam height to be considered, the ecological flow, the levelized cost of electricity to be accepted for each region, either in off-grid or in grid connection, the service level to be attained to the mini-grids, from which the demand will also derive, the option of using diesel as backup, their sizing and costs. The CONSULTANT will also equate the use of batteries with hydropower even though they are possibly incompatible with storage cycles, given that the resource is not intermittent as wind or solar, but strongly seasonal. 50 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT An adapted SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) for the different scenarios will be developed in this step, considering local characteristics of the regions and looking at environmental (e.g. height of the dam, reservoir area, etc.), social (e.g. population who will benefit from the generation, number of jobs created, etc.), technical (e.g. grid connection distance, rural demand may quickly overcome the hydropower potential) and financial aspects (risk, financing possibilities, time to market). As a conclusion, the usual upsides and downsides of using small hydro to supply power for medium and small isolated systems that are based mainly on LV and MV lines and its customization to the region’s case will be assessed and compared to other off-grid technologies. From the CONSULTANT’s experience, one of the biggest disadvantages of SHP is coping with seasonality of the resource, which may lead to diesel units as backup power. The same evaluation will be performed for grid connected projects. The updated load demand forecast (EI input) is mandatory as it will limit the potential to be sized to the demand. The penetration of SHP in the system shall also be addressed in order to promote grid stability, and for that sake, a regional benchmark study will be performed. In the end, the main objective is to determine key figures of what may be the use of hydropower, coping with the demand, environmental and social constraints. This will be determined island by island, region by region, based on the identified potential by the CONSULTANT and the estimated demand determined by the EI, and will define how hydropower will promote rural electrification and grid expansion. The outcome of this task will be the tentative ranges of capacity in each system, both in terms of off-grid and on-grid power based on SHP. Start: the task may start after a preliminary version of the national database is produced Duration of the task: 2 months 11. Update of already identified potential for SHP development The list of projects at this stage should be complemented and updated through visits to the major wilayahs and compiling information on preliminary permits for hydropower at the local governments. For this tour through the wilayahs, a visit plan will be worked closely with PLN Pusat, who should assign at each location a local counterpart, not only for the PLN related information, but also to accompany the CONSULTANT in the meetings with the local authorities. From the CONSULTANT’s behalf, the visits shall be conducted by a team of three to four persons comprising at least one member of the local consultant IHC and a senior staff member either from GESTO or AQUALOGUS, presumably: 51 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT 1. Chandra Adriawan (IHC) 2. Joana Santos (GESTO) 3. Francisco Carvalho (AQUALOGUS) 4. Fábio Santos (AQUALOGUS) Considering the feedback obtained and the advancement of the works, the team may be divided into two for time saving purposes. Given language restraints, the local consultant will be responsible for the interactions with the local authorities and the senior staff member will coordinate the assignment. The visits shall consist of an initial kick-off meeting with the regional managers and main responsible staff, including project presentation, goals and necessary clearance procedures, followed by the first interaction with a designated local counterpart and finally several operational working meetings with technical staff for data collection and regional characterization. Start: the task may start after the task 10 - Review of SHP role Duration of the task: 3 months 12. Strategic analysis to review and prioritize SHP potential The characterization of the projects listed in the PLN database of IPP’s requests is made upon the IPP studies. Some of the studies are with the required level of detail for a feasibility study, but some may not reach that level. One of the concerns in the evaluation of the studies is to assess the quality of the studies at the planning level. Therefore, some indicators should be obtained in order to make a classification of the prefeasibility study quality. The quality of the prefeasibility study may be an early indicator of the overall capacity of the IPP for the project development and, consequently, the actual feasibility of the project. Nevertheless, a site location with a poor feasibility study may still have hydropower potential and should not be discarded. In this sense, an update of the already identified potential, including the outcomes of the previous task will be performed, on one hand, taking into consideration the data provided in the prefeasibility study (if available), on the other hand, taking into consideration the datasets of information collected on 6 – Comprehensive Compilation of Existing Info and Data. Site visits are only expected for a few sites, if any, and just in case there are some significant conflicting issues between nearby projects or in case a highly promising project lacks important field characterization. The CONSULTANT will make an effort to identify any eventual need to perform them as soon as possible with the hopes to combine the event 52 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT with the visits to the wilayahs of the previous task, taking advantage of the mobilization and presence of a team. Nonetheless, the team that will conduct them shall not differ greatly from the one that performed the visits to the wilayahs with the possible addition of any other specialized member to be defined. The local consultant will be responsible for the logistics preparation of the visits and interaction with local authorities and population and the international consultants will be responsible for the technical supervision of the assignment. The establishment of a local PLN counterpart that might preferably accompany the site visits would also be extremely helpful, if not crucial. The visits shall comprise a preliminary site assessment from the team of experts, consisting mainly of visual observation and simple surveys and verifications (e.g. GPS coordinates, flow regime, surface geotechnical considerations, land cover). Topographic and geotechnical surveys and hydrological measurements are not comprised. The compiled list of small hydro potential in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi will be reviewed and prioritized through a gradual screening as the information is gathered and the analysis undertaken become more thorough and complete, taking into account the hydrological, geological, sediment, environmental, and social risks, access, land ownership, protected and environmentally sensitive areas, military and other exclusion zones, and security issues, reviewing the cost estimates conducted in previous studies. The screening process to be implemented will follow the process described in Figure 4.5. Figure 4.5 - Workflow of small hydro prioritizing process. 53 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT The first phase (Phase 1) of the screening will consist on a selection to exclude any small hydro projects that are already constructed or under construction, or with execution plans under development, as it will not be an option for future capacity planning. Projects for which exact location (coordinates) where not retrieved will also be excluded. Next step (Phase 2) consists on an initial multi-criteria analysis with different criterion and corresponding relevance in order to sort out the best projects, followed by a one by one analysis to reach the Phase 2 Selection. The multi-criteria analysis will weight quantitative and qualitative variables, for an overall score to rank the projects. This will allow in a first screening to eliminate projects below a chosen cut-out score for a given region. The determination of the cut-out score is dependent from the availability of sites and hydropower potential and will be assessed with PLN. As an example, quantitative criterion may be:  LCOE - Levelized Cost Of Electricity  Capacity and annual energy production estimate;  Budget estimate;  Affected population; On the other hand, some qualitative criteria may follow:  Water-use constraints;  Protected and environmentally sensitive areas;  Local electrification demand and/or transmission access;  Land access issues;  Military and other exclusion zones;  Ease of access for commissioning and maintenance purposes;  Assessment of possible long-term climate change impacts;  The World Bank’s Safeguards policies. For the evaluation of the criteria, available studies will be taken into account, reviewed through the information retrieved from GIS and hydrologic simulation and cost estimation, in order to compare less detailed studies on the same common ground. In order to be able to evaluate the first three listed quantitative criteria, a preliminary analysis of hydroelectric potential of all projects must be performed and it will depend on the level of detail of the consulted studies. If necessary, a preliminary surface runoff map will be constructed in order to give an early estimate of each site mean annual runoff. For the surface runoff determination an indirect approach will be used - the Turc method. This method is a standard and widespread monthly rainfall-runoff model whose inputs are 54 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT monthly time series of rainfall totals and long term estimates of annual potential evapotranspiration. It is worth mentioning that this task may comprise the integration of global databases (TRMM, GPCP, and Worldclim) and ground-based data (local) where available in a timely manner, always aiming to provide the highest level of accuracy possible. Below is a summary representation of the workflow for the surface runoff modeling. Hydrology rainfall-runoff Input datasets processing chart Outputs Rainfall Dataset Watershed (defined at pour point) Rainfall [mm] and Temperature [ C] Accumulating procedures to derive the distributed watershed climatic Mean daily flow [ in m3/s] or mean annual variables at the pour volume [m3] points Rainfall – Runoff methods to obtain the accumulated Legend Temperature Dataset Runoff (at watershed pourpoint) 3 m /s 0-1 flow at the watershed 2 - 100 101 - 200 201 - 500 pour points 501 - 1000 1001 - 1500 1501 - 3000 3001 - 4500 4501 - 6278 Runoff isolines [mm] Iterative de-accumulation of runoff in order to obtain the 1st order derivation of runoff (flow Other climatic or auxilliary datasets if needed by isolines) selected rainfall – runoff method Figure 4.6 - Summary representation of the workflow for the surface runoff modeling. The next step is to simulate multiple scenarios for different hydro schemes, evaluating not only electricity generation potential, either to be taken from the studies or simulated using a flow duration curve, but also estimating relevant costs based on CAPEX and OPEX cost-curves (adapted and calibrated to local conditions, if data is provided). For each location multiple combinations of the above mentioned influencing parameters (i.e.: several heights of dam or lengths of penstocks for a given site) are simulated. This process will allow a review on the cost estimates conducted in previous studies and the design optimization. The optimization of the design and cost estimates allows the determination of preliminary LCOE’s for each project, as well as their energy production. The rest of the evaluated criteria will require adequate and updated information in the form of key GIS layers compiled. This 55 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT information will be loaded in the attributes of the SHP database, as well as the score of the multi-criteria analysis. A project shall be excluded if its score is above the lower acceptable limit for that region. The results from the multi-criteria screening shall secondly be reviewed considering the focus on supporting isolated grid systems, consisting on a one by one analysis, considering population and load centers, power grid including 20kV substations and above. This process will also require the selection/exclusion of competitor projects, as many can be submerged by the dam reservoir of another, the exclusion of small hydro projects with no significant contribution to the power capacity of a studied isolated system and of projects which are too distant from the grid or from any point of demand. To aid in this process of one by one analysis, some site visits might be promoted. The visits to some of the sites could provide the collection of important information that will help in the decision making at this stage. In Phase 3, the final prioritization will result of a strategic analysis consisting of evaluating each project within the defined criteria for major strategic options. Major strategic options may include hydroelectric potential, Regional development, off grid Electrification, Least cost planning, Environmental impact and other constraints. A set of key indicators for Phases 2 and 3 will be worked closely with PLN to achieve the best performance. The strategic analysis will produce a ranking of the projects on a step by step procedure that will allow reaching the list of promising sites. Start: the task may start after task 12-Strategic analysis to review and prioritize SHP potential Duration of the task: 3 months 13. List of most promising SHP sites The strategic analysis, applied to the selected regions, will provide a list of promising sites, according to the set of indicators. The list of most promising sites will be derived from the selected weights of those indicators and it will be submitted for approval by the client. Start: the task may start after task 12-Strategic analysis to review and prioritize SHP potential Duration of the task: 1 month 56 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT 14. Draft Small Hydropower Mapping reports The previous activities will be reported and a draft will be presented for client’s approval. In the main report, entitled “Small Hydropower Mapping”, the methods and results of the country-wide resource maps for small hydro will be summarized. The report will include maps created from GIS layers and will present existing information on small hydro in Indonesia. The report will be constructed in order to be a future guide for the updating of the database and the inclusion of new data. In a separate report, which will be named “Review and Update of Small Hydro in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi”, the methods and results from the review and prioritization of small hydro will be described in a way that replication for other regions may be possible in the future. Start: the task may start after the task 13 - List of most promising SHP sites. Duration of the task: 2 months 15. Workshop A workshop will be held in Jakarta to present the results to the client, get feedback from stakeholders and discuss next steps. The workshop will have two day duration. The first day to present the results to PLN (session A), the second to present the results to the stakeholders (session B)6. Both session A and B intend to promote a framework and comprehensive explanation of the development work, but to different group targets. In the presentation to the client a deeper focus on the methods will be made, while for stakeholders a focus on results, lessons learned and consequences will be made. Nonetheless, if found more fruitful a single session joint workshop for both PLN and stakeholders might be considered. The workshop sessions are summarized in Table 4.7. 6 In the preliminary proposed methodology, the workshop was planned with the duration of one more day for training of PLN staff. Given that the scope of the assignment includes a training component (that was optional in the proposal), the staff training will be addressed in that specific component. 57 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT Table 4.7 - Workshop sessions target, topics and duration. Session Target Topics Duration Source data Methodologies Difficulties and how it was PLN directors, PLN staff responsible for generation planning, overcome A 1 day hydraulics and dams, wilayahs managers Shortlists of projects (scenarios) Discussion and scenario selection for stakeholders presentation Brief presentation of source data Stakeholders – HPP promoters, local authorities, equipment and methodologies; B industry, construction industry, regulatory departments(energy, Shortlists of projects (selected ½ day water, environment) scenarios) Discussion Start: the task may start up to two weeks before the scheduled delivery of the draft report Duration of the task: 2 Weeks 16. Small Hydropower Mapping report Following the draft review by the client, the feedback from the workshop and the necessary changes, the final reports on Small Hydropower Mapping and Review and Update of Small Hydro in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi will be delivered to the client for his approval. Start: the task may start after the Workshop. Duration of the task: 1 month Support to the inclusion of Small Hydro Potential to the Geospatial Electrification Planning for NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi 17. Coordination with the parallel GEP tool contract The coordination with the parallel contract will start by working with the load nodes resultant from the Network Planner, for the base case of off-grid alternative from PV and the assumed grid generation costs by the Earth Institute in the parallel contract. The demand, aggregated in this preliminary way, will give the order of magnitude of the required capacity in each island, region, and isolated system. This will allow limiting the capacity of the projects and achieving a worst case scenario LCOE for those load nodes. 58 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT The second approach is to obtain the best LCOE for each site, through the optimization of the capacity for the site. This will allow achieving the best case scenario for the site. The true capacity and LCOE of the possible hydropower project to meet the demand, under the assumptions used by the Earth Institute, will be in this range. The CONSULTANT will work closely with the Earth Institute in order to achieve the balance between load and LCOE for the hydropower projects. The coordination with the parallel GEP tool contract, although being a task itself, is meant to be performed right from the task 10- -Review of SHP role. At this point of the work plan, the CONSULTANT will prepare the delivery of information to the EI, assuring that all the required information regarding small hydropower plants for the Network Planner is prepared and in a compatible format. Both teams had the opportunity to meet during the EI/Castalia final workshop and exchange some preliminary information. The need for a written authorization from PLN allowing EI to provide information to the CONSULTANT was foreseen and should be worked right away, as the EI needs to abide to the MoU signed with PLN. The contact between the teams will be preferentially remote, but if work plans allow, any workshops or meetings to be held in Jakarta may be aligned in order to promote the cooperation and get together the regional teams working in both contracts. Start: the task may start after the delivery of the reports of the Activity 1. Duration of the task: 1 month 18. List of potential SHP sites in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi to be incorporated in the GEP tool From the list of sites obtained in Activity 1 and after the review based on the coordination with the parallel GEP tool contract, a final list of sites will be delivered to the Earth Institute in order to be incorporated in the GEP tool. The format of data will be compatible with the form required by the Geospatial Electrification Planning. If the preliminary results from the Network Planner indicate the need for modification of the list of potential SHP sites, the CONSULTANT will revise or expand the list in order to promote both the off-grid electrification as well as lowering the costs of grid connected generation. Start: the task may start after the coordination with the parallel GEP tool contract task Duration of the task: 2 months 59 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT 19. Revision of interim and final results from the GEP tool The results from Activity 1 will then be provided to the Geospatial Electrification Tool in order to optimize electrification in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi. The CONSULTANT will also work closely with the parallel project to review the interim and final results from a hydro generation point of view. The CONSULTANT will further coordinate the final reporting of conducted work with the parallel contract to assure that the WB and the Client receives a complete description of the Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning process in Indonesia. Start: the task may start after a preliminary version of the List of potential SHP sites in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi to be incorporated in the GEP tool Duration of the task: 1.5 months 20. Policy recommendations on the development of SHP in Indonesia The final report will include policy recommendations on the development of small hydro in Indonesia, based on the results and experience of the assignment. Start: the task may start after a preliminary version of the revision of interim and final results from the GEP tool Duration of the task: 1 month 21. Final workshop The CONSULTANT will participate and contribute to a final workshop in Jakarta to present the final results for the Client and stakeholders. Start: the task may start after the policy recommendations on the development of SHP in Indonesia task Duration of the task: 2 weeks 22. Final reports The CONSULTANT will produce a Final Report with the summarized findings of Activity 2. Start: the task may start after the final workshop Duration of the task: 1 month 60 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT Training in GIS and Small Hydro Mapping and Validation Training in GIS A. Introduction to GIS The introduction to GIS is designed for individuals without previous knowledge (or very little knowledge) of GIS. The main objectives of the Introduction to GIS is to provide knowledge to PLN on the chosen platform Quantum GIS for the creation of GIS maps, exploration and analysis of the data stored in the Hydropower Database, as well as adding external data do maps to elaborate maps with different context. The topics covered by this module are described below: • Create and explore a GIS map • Components of a GIS • Geographic data and tabular formats • Metadata • Coordinate systems • Sources of GIS data • Navigating on a GIS map • Finding features • Identify features and gather information • Feature symbology • Solving beginner spatial problems • Best practices to share maps and results • Best practices on geographic data organization for a mapping project Start: the task may start after the task 15 - Workshop Duration of the task: 20 hours B. Editing and data creation The editing and data creation module will provide PLN the skills to create, explore, manage and analyze geographic data, with special care to the information gathered in the national GIS database on small hydro. The topics covered by this module are listed below: 61 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT • Geographic data creation, organization and editing • Layers management, symbology and labels • Design page layouts and printing • Setting scale ranges in layer display • Querying data • Grouping layers • Solving intermediate spatial problems • Storing data in a database • Qualitative and quantitative data • Symbology by attributes and classification • Fields and value calculation • Join and relate Start: the task may start after the module A - Introduction to GIS Duration of the task: 32 hours C. Analysis and mapping The analysis and mapping module will prepare PLN staff to develop a workflow for any GIS analysis. The first step of the workflow is the placement of the problem and the consideration of the available criteria. The topics covered by this module are listed below: • Workflow steps • Data quality and coordinate systems • Buffer • Voronoi and Thiessen Polygons • Distance matrix • Overlay tools • Terrain analysis • Hydrology models • Raster statistics • Thematic Maps • Layouts Start: the task may start after the module B - Editing and data creation Duration of the task: 40 hours 62 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT Mapping and validation of small hydro D. Grid connection, isolated systems and backup The grid connection, isolated systems and complementarity of renewable sources will focus on whether an identified site is suitable for a grid connection project, isolated, or both, through the consideration of the connection available and its distance, as well as the requirements in terms of intermittency of the production to supply an isolated grid, the need of backup and the sizing of batteries or diesel backup. The complementarity with other energy sources may be studied if suitable in PLN plans. Start: the task may start after the task 21 - Final Workshop Duration of the task: 16 hours E. Risks and selection of works on hydropower development The risks and selection of works on hydropower development will give trainees the insights on type of works and selection methodology, given the site characteristics, the pros and cons of each type. The risks and environmental concerns will also be addressed. Start: the task may start after the module D - Grid connection, isolated systems and backup Duration of the task: 8 hours F. Hydrology and hydrological modelling The hydrology and hydrological modelling will cover all the techniques applied in the development of the small hydro database. From the acquisition methods of data, the management of information, to technical applications such as the data consistency analysis, workflows to obtain the flow duration curve. Start: the task may start after the module E - Risks and selection of works on hydropower development Duration of the task: 16 hours 63 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT G. Hydraulic design at plan level The hydraulic design at this level will consist on the achievement of the main characteristics of the civil works and equipment, gathered from the topographical characteristics, considering the hydrology and hydrological modelling of the watershed, in order to meet the energy demand. Start: the task may start after the module F - Hydrology and hydrological modelling Duration of the task: 16 hours H. Project design work The project design work will include all the covered areas of knowledge and its application will be the primary focus. Besides the application of the concepts and the design of proprietary excel worksheets, the ones used by the CONSULTANT will be extensively explained to allow its use by the staff of PLN. Start: the task may start after the module G - Hydraulic design at plan level Duration of the task: 20 hours 64 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT 4.6 MILESTONES The following represent key project milestones, with estimated completion dates: Milestone Estimated Completion Date Inception Phase Initial Steering Committee Meeting April 2014 Inception Report Mid July 2014 Decision Meeting Late August 2014 MoU for Data Provision Late August 2014 Creating a GIS Database for National Information on SHP Development Comprehensive Compilation of Existing Info and End of September 2014 Designing of GIS Database on SHP development Late December 2014 SHP Role and Potential in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi Region visits Early January 2014 List of most promising sites Late July 2015 Reporting and Activity 1 Workshop Draft Report Mid-September 2015 Workshop Late September 2015 Training part 1 Late September 2015 SHP Mapping Report Late October 2015 Approval Late November 2015 Coordination with the Parallel Contract List of potential sites Late January 2016 Final workshop Late February 2016 Training part 2 Mid March 2016 Final Reports/Approval Late March 2016 PLN/WB approval or feedback Travel dates 65 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT 4.7 WORKPLAN Completed Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Task # ACTIVITY 1 Task INCEPTION Task 1 INCEPTION MISSION Task 2 INITIAL COMPILATION OF EXISTING INFO AND DATA Task 3 DETAIL OF PRELIMINARY METHODOLOGY Task 4 INCEPTION REPORT DECISION MEETING Task 5 FINAL METHODOLOGY CREATING A GIS DATABASE FOR NATIONAL INFORMATION ON SHP DEVELOPMENT Task 6 COMPREHENSIVE COMPILATION OF EXISTING INFO AND DATA Task 7 DESIGNING A GIS DATABASE ON SHP DEVELOPMENT Task 8 CREATION OF MAPS OF FINDINGS IN SHP DEVELOPMENT IN INDONESIA Task 9 DEVELOPMENT OF PROPOSAL ON HOSTING AND OPERATION OF THE SHP GIS DATABASE SHP ROLE AND POTENTIAL IN NTT, MALUKU, MALUKU UTARA, AND SULAWESI Task 10 REVIEW OF SHP ROLE Task 11 UPDATE OF ALREADY IDENTIFIED POTENTIAL FOR SHP DEVELOPMENT Task 12 STRATEGIC ANALYSIS TO REVIEW AND PRIORITIZE SHP POTENTIAL Task 13 LIST OF MOST PROMISING SHP SITES REPORTING AND ACTIVITY 1 WORKSHOP Task 14 DRAFT SHP MAPPING REPORT Task 15 WORKSHOP Task 16 SHP MAPPING REPORT APPROVAL OF REPORT ACTIVITY 2 Task 17 COORDINATION WITH THE PARALELL GEP TOOL CONTRACT Task 18 LIST OF POTENTIAL SHP SITES IN NTT, MALUKU, MALUKU UTARA, AND SULAWESI TO BE INCORPORATED IN THE GEP TOOL Task 19 REVISION OF INTERIM AND FINAL RESULTS FROM THE GEP TOOL Task 20 POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF SHP IN INDONESIA Task 21 FINAL WORKSHOP Task 22 FINAL REPORTS TRAINING TRAINING IN GIS MAPPING AND VALIDATION OF SMALL HYDRO Travel to/from Indonesia Duration of sub-activity Travel within Indonesia Duration of task Deliverable Validation/approval from the WB/GoI Workshop/Capacity Building WB/GoI decisions 66 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT 5 CONCLUSIONS The Inception Mission allowed the CONSULTANT to take the pulse of the current status of small hydropower and geographical information systems at PLN and the framework for small hydropower development in Indonesia. The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources has promoted a legal framework to streamline small hydropower in Indonesia, opening it up to the private sector. PLN is currently the off-taker for the regulated Feed-in Tariff. However, in the processes of hydropower licensing, the resource evaluation is only took by the promoter, who takes all the assumptions and the risk, facing financing difficulties in the end of the licensing process, not reaching the financial close of the PPA. Cooperation and financial agencies seem to be willing to support the small hydropower business, to which an evaluation of potential and resources may be a handful tool. Hence, with this assignment the CONSULTANT believes being able to grant PLN:  a clear picture of the potential each PPA request has, in the regions of NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi,  a tool to store and manage the PPA request information,  a tool to analyze and evaluate the potential of a site location,  a process to cope with the prioritization and ranking of multiple sites. The CONSULTANT concludes that the methodology originally presented on the Technical Proposal was adequate for the study, but the work plan needed to be slightly revised to take into consideration some data clearance issues that culminated on the tentative establishment of the MoU for data provision for the project. In fact, it is supposed that the acceptance of the final methodology is coincident with the provision of the required data. The CONSULTANT will abide to any restriction on the use of the data that PLN may impose, as long as it is accepted by The World Bank and allows for the fulfillment of the project. Moreover, opening the info of the GIS database to the general public is ultimately PLN’s decision, since the project could be performed as intended only for PLN’s internal access or alternatively with different levels of access (defined by PLN for that matter) and it would still be an extremely valid planning/management tool. Notwithstanding, additional tasks have been foreseen in order to give PLN and the WB the option of replacing the required information by performing a greenfield study of the small hydropower resources and remaking the MapInfo database from the softcopy of the JICA Master plan. Based on the data provision experience during the Inception Mission, the CONSULTANT considers it to be essential for the focus of the project in Sulawesi, NTT, Maluku and Maluku Utara, that PLN Pusat should timely inform local management of the upcoming assignments and thus grant easy access to the required information and assistance in meetings with external local authorities or any other relevant field work. 67 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT The cooperation with the team working in the parallel contract is expected to occur in an early phase of the project. Both teams had the opportunity to meet during the Inception Meeting and it was foreseen the need of a written authorization from PLN in order to allow EI/Castalia to share the information with the CONSULTANT. The first main exchange of information is expected to occur in Activity 1 - task 10, mainly collecting data from the EI to be analyzed by the CONSULTANT. The second, should take place along the Activity 2, where the interaction between both teams will take place in order to build coherent visions between small hydropower and network planning. The training components have been fully integrated into the project. The first part of the training, Training in GIS, will be held after the first workshop on Small Hydro Mapping. The second, Mapping and validation on small hydro, will take place after the final workshop. We believe that this approach is fully suited not only to the initial Terms of Reference of the project, which were fully aligned with the objectives of the study, but also for the available data in the PLN and current status of Geographical Information Systems in the institution. 68 ID.2014.R.003.1 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT REFERENCES Agency, National Geospatial Intelligence. GEOnet Names Server (GNS). n.d. http://earth- info.nga.mil/gns/html/ (accessed 06 09, 2014). —. VMAPO. n.d. http://gis-lab.info/qa/vmap0-eng.html (accessed 06 09, 2014). BIG, Badan Informasi Geospasial. Indonesian Geospatial Information Agency. n.d. http://www.bakosurtanal.go.id/ (accessed 06 09, 2014). DEN, Dewan Energi Nasional. "Kebijakan Energi Nasional (KEN) 2014-2050." Jakarta, 2014. ESA, European Space Agency. GlobCover. n.d. http://due.esrin.esa.int/globcover/ (accessed 06 09, 2014). GADM. Global Adminstrative Areas. n.d. http://www.gadm.org/ (accessed 06 09, 2014). IHC. IHC knowledgebase. n.d. http://www.indonesia-hydro.com/knowledge_base (accessed 06 09, 2014). JICA. "Project for the Master Plan Study of Hydropower Development in Indonesia." Jakarta, 2011. MoEMR. "Pengelolaan Energi Nasional (PEN) 2006-2025." Jakarta, 2006. MoEMR. "Rencana Umum Ketenagalistrikan Nasiona 2012-2031l (RUKN)." Jakarta, 2012. MoFo. WebGIS Forest. n.d. http://webgis.dephut.go.id (accessed 06 09, 2014). PLN. "Rencana Umum Pertagananana Listrika (RUPTL) 2013-2022." Jakarta, 2013. USGS. Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM). n.d. http://srtm.usgs.gov/ (accessed 06 09, 2014). WDPA, World Database on Protected Areas. Protected Planet. n.d. http://www.protectedplanet.net/ (accessed 06 09, 2014). WMO, World Meteorological Organization. n.d. http://www.wmo.int/ (accessed 06 09, 2014). WorldClim. WorldClim - Global Climate Data. n.d. http://www.worldclim.org/ (accessed 06 09, 2014). 69 ID.2014.R.003.1 GESTO ENERGIA S.A. Av. Cáceres Monteiro, nº 10, 1º Sul 1495-131 Algés, Portugal T. +351 211 579 899 F. +351 211 540 900 www.gestoenergy.com SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANNING INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – ANNEX I TERMS OF REFERENCE July 2014 Copyright © 2014, Gesto Energia S.A. Selection #1125330 Renewable Energy Mapping: Small Hydro – Indonesia TERMS OF REFERENCE Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning Indonesia Project ID: P145273 Selection #: 1125330 1. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES 1. These Terms of Reference (TOR) relate to a Request for Proposals (RFP) for services as part of a technical assistance project being implemented by the World Bank (’WB’, the recipient for this work) in Indonesia (the ‘Client’) which aims to support resource mapping and geospatial planning for small hydropower. It is being undertaken in close coordination with PLN, the World Bank’s primary Client country counterpart for this project. The project is funded by the Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP), a global knowledge and technical assistance program administered by the World Bank and supported by 11 bilateral donors, and is part of a global ESMAP initiative in support of renewable energy mapping. 2. The ESMAP initiative is supporting country-driven efforts to improve renewable energy (RE) resource awareness, put in place appropriate policy frameworks for RE development, and provide ‘open access’ to resource and geospatial data. It will also support the IRENA Global Atlas1 by improving the data availability and quality that can be accessed through IRENA’s online mapping portal on a modular basis. The initiative will support five phases of resource mapping and geospatial planning activities, as illustrated in Figure 1. The phases are intended to illustrate the key steps (resource mapping, geospatial planning, and development of policy recommendations) plus a range of supporting activities running concurrently. 3. This consulting opportunity relates to one of several projects that will procure services under the Indefinite Delivery Agreements (framework contracts) signed between the WB and selected consulting firms/consortia (‘Vendors’) as a result of “Selection 1092748: Framework Agreement for Small Hydropower Data and Resource Mapping Services”. The TOR for Selection 1088343 provide further details on the background and scope of the ESMAP initiative, in addition to the information available on the ESMAP website.2 1 See http://www.irena.org/globalatlas/ for further details. 2 http://www.esmap.org/RE_Mapping Page 1 of 17 Selection #1125330 Renewable Energy Mapping: Small Hydro – Indonesia Figure 1: Five phases of RE resource mapping being supported under the ESMAP initiative. 4. This project in Indonesia is being developed in response to strong Client demand, and has benefited from the input of Client counterparts in terms of the scoping and prioritization of activities. A scoping mission was undertaken in August 2013 where representatives from the World Bank met with key Client counterparts. The work will be embedded within the World Bank’s ongoing energy sector dialogue with the Client, and should be viewed as a component in a package of ongoing technical assistance and financial support. COUNTRY AND SECTOR CONTEXT 5. Indonesia has an energy mix which is dominated by fossil fuels (coal, crude oil, gas). Renewable Energy (mainly geothermal and hydro) contributes presently only to 7.2% of the energy mix. Hydro only contributes to 2.0%. In the power sector Indonesia has about 40 GW of installed capacity (27 GW of these are in Java-Bali). About 3.8 GW is installed hydro and 3.2 GW geothermal. Rapidly decreasing power reserves will further lower RE’s share of the power mix, as the government Page 2 of 17 Selection #1125330 Renewable Energy Mapping: Small Hydro – Indonesia currently undergoes a fast track program to build about 20 GW of coal-fired power plants. 6. The Government of Indonesia’s (GoI) policy is therefore to support RE and it has set a goal that 25% of the energy mix in 2025 shall come from renewable energy. A Presidential regulation 4/2010 instructs PLN to accelerate the development of new power generation plants in which RE comprises 40% of the power plant candidates. The GoI also in 2010 introduced a Feed-in-Tariff for small RE to encourage private investments in clean power production. The present power master plan (RUPTL) includes 6,250 MW of hydro to be commissioned through 2021. In the near term, as part of phase II of the Fast Track program (up to 2014), 1,750 MW of hydro is planned. 7. GoI policy also aims to increase electrification access from the present 75% to 95% by 2025. Access is mainly low in the remote areas of Java and Bali and in islands outside the area covered by the Java-Bali system. As one of the actions, the GoI has launched the 1,000-island electrification program under which PLN plans to convert isolated-grids in Indonesia’s islands from diesel-based generation to renewable diesel hybrid systems, and introduce renewable energy generation (mainly solar PV, and mini-hydro) at greenfield sites, combined with network expansion at project locations. 8. Small hydro in Indonesia is defined as schemes below 10 MW. Based on this definition, of the currently installed total hydro capacity of 3,800 MW, about 250 MW is small hydro. The RUPTL includes plans for small hydro development of 660 MW up to year 2021. The majority of these are anticipated to be developed as IPPs (575 MW). Geographically, 180 MW are anticipated in Java/Bali, 200 MW in East Indonesia and 195 MW in West Indonesia. A steep increase in planned small hydro during the last years can be seen as an effect of the Feed-in-Tariff. In the 2009 RUPTL the plans for small hydro only included 268 MW (200 MW for IPP). The increase in the 2011 RUPTL reflects the large number of requested PPAs to PLN from private investors during the last few years. 9. The role of small hydro in Indonesia is linked to the cost of generation and the configuration of transmission and distribution systems in the country. Since the focus of conducted hydro plans has been on generation for grid extension, the long-term marginal costs for existing grids have been used as one the screening tools. Therefore, most small hydro was screened off because estimated costs per kWh for small hydro in general are higher than the long-term marginal cost. The long-term marginal cost for power generation, however, varies much across Indonesia. Costs in the Java and Bali where the grid is well developed are below 0.1 $/Kwh, while costs in remote provinces, such as Maluku, may be above 0.2 $/kWh. Furthermore, isolated small grid systems or household power are almost exclusively based on diesel generators, which would have unit costs in the order of 0.3-0.5 $/kWh. Because of the wide difference in existing production costs across Indonesia and between grid connected and isolated grid systems, the role of hydro is from an economic point of view therefore mostly of interest in isolated systems and in remote provinces of Indonesia. The FIT introduced in 2010 has, however, partly changed the role of small hydro based on economic viability. Small hydro has as a result therefore also become of interest in the regions of Sumatra and Java, which can be clearly seen by the current activity in small hydro from private investors. PROJECT CONTEXT 10. Hydro mapping and planning has been done on regular basis for Indonesia. Hydropower Master Plans were conducted 1983, 1999, and 2011 by PLN, supported by JICA. The Hydro Master Plan gives Page 3 of 17 Selection #1125330 Renewable Energy Mapping: Small Hydro – Indonesia input to the National Power Master Plans that are updated annually (RUPTL). The Hydro Master Plan in 1999 was based on a gross list of potential projects at 1,249 sites. Of these 347 had an estimated optimum capacity below 10 MW. The latest 2011 Master Plan resulted in a final list of 74 hydro projects with total capacity of 8,040 MW to be developed and commissioned up to 2027. None of these are small hydro. 11. In addition to the National Hydro Master Plan, plans and development of small hydro are conducted on an ad-hoc basis. The feed-in tariff introduced in 2010 has resulted in a large number of private investors having secured preliminary permits with the local governments and many of these have been further studied. PLN has so far got 239 requests (1,066 MW) for PPAs for small hydro. Of these 29 are already under operation, 36 are under construction, and the remaining are under procurement or are negotiating PPAs. It is unclear how these sites were identified, and how many of these overlap the 1999 Master Plan gross list of sites. PLN has also by request of some local governments signed MoUs for identification and preparation studies for small hydro. Examples are in parts of Papua and Sulawesi. Recently also donor initiatives have targeted small RE resource mapping for parts of Indonesia, (e.g. a new project just starting on Sumba Island in NTT is supported by ADB). 12. In Indonesia mapping of hydro resources has thus already been conducted to a large extent. However, for small hydro there are limited coordination and prioritization of private investments and local initiatives, and there exists no systematic approach to how mapping or planning exercises are conducted. Furthermore, the progress and results of the planning and development of small hydro is not summarized in any central database. Preliminary permits are available only at district level at the local governments. Lists of PPA requests from private investors and results of PLN’s own mapping exist in Jakarta but are not consolidated and stored in one place. 13. Conducted hydro mapping and planning in Indonesia is traditional in the sense that it focuses on grid extension. Because of this focus small hydro for isolated systems was generally not considered. In isolated systems a high levelized cost may still be economically viable compared to the much higher cost of diesel or PV solar hybrid generation. As an example from the 1999 Hydro Master Plan there are identified 61 potential sites below 5 MW in NTT, an area which has 550 islands and are dominated by isolated systems, has an electrification rate below 50%, and 99% of existing installed power capacity is based on diesel. None of these 61 sites passed the screening based on long-term marginal costs, which would probably not be the case if the screening limit had been based on the production costs in isolated systems. The planning of small hydro in small isolated grid systems would also be different compared to traditional mapping in the sense that limited demand will likely not require maximization of the generation capacity at every site. 14. Private investments in hydropower need three steps; i) preliminary permit at District level, ii) an approved PPA with PLN, for which they conduct an inter-connection study, and iii) an operational license. The exchange of information between steps is not optimal and often PLN does not know of the plans until they are fairly advanced and many investments already have been made for land acquisition and preparatory studies. This risks leading to non-optimized design of schemes, and sometimes leads to conflicts on the point of interconnection. The schemes may also be rejected at a late stage if the proposed small hydro schemes affect negatively on larger hydro projects under the national master plan. Page 4 of 17 Selection #1125330 Renewable Energy Mapping: Small Hydro – Indonesia 15. Electrification expansion is conducted through ‘road maps’ proposed by PLN’s local offices (wilayahs). The expansion road maps are made based on factors such as magnitude of demand and distance from the existing electricity grid, and electrification ratio. It is not conducted on a least cost basis. The World Bank, supported by AusAID, and ASTAE is thus supporting a geospatial least cost electrification planning TA in Indonesia with the purpose to develop electrification planning capacity of PLN . A geospatial electrification planning tool has been developed by Earth Institute (Columbia University, NY) as a least cost optimization tool for grid extension and development of island based grids, and isolated systems, and is currently being applied in NTT, Maluku and Maluku Utara. The tool has the possibility to include different generation sources for isolated systems. OBJECTIVES 16. Based on the sector and project context it is concluded that small hydro can play a role in clean power generation in Indonesia, and that there is interest from both the GOI and private investors to develop small hydro, but that there lacks promotion and coordinated planning of small hydro development. The sought consultancy services thus have an overall objective to mainstream small hydro into the planning process for generation growth and electrification planning in Indonesia. 17. Specifically the consultancy services have the specific purpose to: a. Facilitate and improve the planning process of small hydro in both grid and isolated systems through establishment of GIS-based databases, which will help PLN to optimize development and avoid conflicts with long-term maximized utilization of the resource. b. Promote and facilitate the role of small hydro in remote areas and in isolated grid systems, where the need is to go from planning small hydro based on maximized capacity and least cost per kWh, to customizing schemes (stand alone or hybrid) to demand to get the highest benefit of substituting diesel. 18. The consultancy services will be done in parallel on two scales following expressed interest from PLN: a. Building up a central database on small hydro at a national scale to be housed in PLN’s central office in Jakarta. b. Improved electrification planning by integrating small hydro potential for the provinces of NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi in eastern Indonesia. The two components will be linked through developing the national database on small hydro in such a way that it can feed input to the geospatial electrification planning tool, which is in the long-term aimed to be implemented for the entire country. STRUCTURE OF CONSULTANCY SERVICES 19. The consultancy services for conducting small hydro mapping in Indonesia are proposed to be conducted under two contracts: a. A contract covering the build-up of a national database of small hydro, improved and validated mapping of small hydro in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi, and training in Page 5 of 17 Selection #1125330 Renewable Energy Mapping: Small Hydro – Indonesia GIS and small hydro mapping (optional). b. A contract covering the extended digitizing of electrification grid systems and power demand for Sulawesi, updated Geospatial Electrification Planning for NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi including small hydro potential, and training in the use of the updated planning tool. 20. These TOR cover the first contract (a). Because of the focus on mainstreaming small hydro and improved strategic planning, capacity building of PLN to create knowledge and resources for continued application is important. Since funding for such training has yet not been secured at the writing of these TOR, the training component is included only as optional, and will not be included in the financial evaluation of the proposals. The proven capacity of the Vendors to provide training and technology transfer will be part of the technical evaluation, and a proposed methodology will be the basis for negotiation of an extended contract if funding will be made available. 21. The services for the second contract (b) will be procured and implemented in parallel with the requested scope in these TOR. The chosen Vendors will be requested to closely coordinate the scope of work between the two contracts. OUTPUTS 22. This TOR document outlines a mapping project that aims to improve the quality and availability of information on Indonesia’s small hydropower resources. The project will provide the Client and commercial developers with data and maps that show the conducted work and levels of hydro potential, and highlight sites suited for small hydro projects. 23. Outputs from the mapping and geospatial planning activity will fall into a number of categories, including: i) data; ii) GIS layers; iii) atlas report; and iv) policy recommendations. The latter might be a non-exhaustive list of potential next steps towards a RE legislation and/or support to private investors, etc. 2. SCOPE OF WORK 24. This assignment covers Phases 1-4 for small hydro resource assessment (Figure 1). However, because small hydro is already a significant part of PLN’s planning and operations in Indonesia and because of the vast geographical area of the country, the four phases have been customized into two activities.  Activity 1 – Data collection and production of a national small hydro GIS database and review and validation of small hydro potential for NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara and Sulawesi: Undertake a comprehensive scoping exercise, source and evaluate existing datasets, identify key stakeholders, carry out a detailed data gathering, and develop initial mapping outputs based on existing country-level datasets. Detailed review and update of small hydro potential for the areas of NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi focusing on its possible role for isolated grids and electrification expansion. Validation of sites through detailed map studies and selected site visits. Inclusion of updated information for the four provinces in the national database.  Activity 2 – Support for the inclusion of small hydro potential in the geospatial electrification Page 6 of 17 Selection #1125330 Renewable Energy Mapping: Small Hydro – Indonesia planning for NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi: Review of existing Geospatial Electrification Planning tool in terms of its ability to include generation sources other than solar PVs, and suggestions for improvements to include small hydro potential. Provision of information on small hydro potential to be fed into the Geospatial Electrification Planning tool based on the updated and validated small hydro potential for NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi. 25. Ground-based measurements and monitoring for validation are very difficult and costly and are thus outside of the scope for this assignment. Such ground-based measurements may, however, be recommended for the high potential small hydro sites identified in the above activities to inform future studies. 26. Validation and application of small hydro potential and integration in the electrification planning will further be conducted for only part of the country, to be continued by PLN for other areas. Because of the limitation in geographic scope, it is essential to build capacity within PLN to enable a continuation of the work. The small hydro mapping assignment in Indonesia therefore also includes a training component (which is optional, see Paragraph 20). 27. Phase 5 of the ESMAP initiative (Figure 1) is outside the scope of these TOR and is likely to be carried out by WB staff and by the Client (with specialist inputs commissioned where needed). However, the chosen Vendor will, based on the results and experience of the services, be requested to make suggestions on changes in policies for developing small hydro in Indonesia. ACTIVITY 1: DATA GIS DATABASE, COLLECTION AND PRODUCTION OF NATIONAL SMALL HYDRO AND REVIEW AND VALIDATION OF SMALL HYDRO POTENTIAL FOR NTT, MALUKU, MALUKU UTARA, AND SULAWESI INCEPTION 28. Upon signing of the contract, the Vendor shall collect and compile relevant information and data sources regarding small hydro development in Indonesia. It is anticipated that the Vendor will need to travel to the country in the early stages of Phase 1 to carry out an Inception Mission, including meetings with the Client, the WB team and relevant stakeholders. The cost of doing so shall be included in the Financial Proposal. 29. The inception stage shall, besides assessment of available information, include an institutional assessment to identify stakeholders and organizations that will be essential for the project’s implementation and for the sustainability of its results. Emphasis shall be given to the institutional capacity for GIS database development, operations and maintenance. 30. Following the Inception Mission, the Vendor shall review compiled data and information, including feedback from meetings, to refine the focus of the study, and to finalize the detailed methodology. Special emphasis shall be given to complement previous work on small hydro potential and avoid duplication. For the purpose of this study ‘small hydro’ shall be defined as having a generation capacity of below 10 MW, including both grid-based and off-grid schemes, but the precise focus of the study will be determined during the Inception Mission. Page 7 of 17 Selection #1125330 Renewable Energy Mapping: Small Hydro – Indonesia 31. The findings of the pre-diagnostic exercise shall be summarized in an Inception Report, which will require approval by the Client and by the WB team for the continuation of the services. The results from the Inception Report shall be presented at a Decision Meeting by the Vendor’s management team, for discussion and decision on the final methodology. It should be assumed that the Decision Meeting will be held remotely via videoconference/Skype. However, the Vendor is requested to provide a quote for attendance at a physical meeting to be held in Jakarta, to be included in the optional components section of the Financial Proposal. CREATING A GIS DATABASE FOR NATIONAL INFORMATION ON SMALL HYDRO DEVELOPMENT 32. After inception the Vendor shall conduct a compilation of all relevant data and information on existing, planned and potential small hydro in Indonesia. The main sources of data and information are anticipated to be from the Hydropower Master Plan’s gross list, PLN’s mapping work, information on private investments, and information from on-going parallel donor support programs. 33. Based on the availability of data types and characteristics, as well as the future benefits of the data for small hydro, the Vendor shall design a GIS database for PLN to store all relevant data on small hydro development. The design of the GIS database shall be made with emphasis on how it can promote and improve small hydro development in Indonesia, taking into account the information on the power sector compiled in the Inception Phase. It shall also be designed to enable input to the Geospatial Electrification Planning tool that has been developed for PLN (see Phase 4). 34. The GIS database shall, besides information on small hydro, be populated with readily available geographic data for Indonesia, such as e.g. administrative borders, topography, river networks, land use, forest conservation, population data, etc. The sources for geographic data are anticipated to be both global and national. Compilation and possible purchase of such data shall be conducted in liaison with PLN and the National Geospatial Institute (BIG). The consultant shall not assume any costs for such data in their proposal, other than work input needed to compile and include the data in the new GIS database. 35. The Vendor shall digitize and assign attributes in GIS format for relevant information on small hydro based on the compiled material, and feed this to the new GIS database. The Vendor shall also digitize and include other information especially essential for small hydro development, e.g. information on reservoirs and large hydro from the Hydro Master Plan. 36. The Vendor shall develop a proposal to PLN on the hosting, operation and maintenance of the small hydro GIS database. This should include the necessary hardware and software, necessary human and financial resources to sustain the database, and recommendations on where it should be hosted. The recommendation should also give guidance on data access and distribution. If institutional capacity is judged low and if data compilation is restricted, the proposed implementation shall be made as a step-wise process, in which PLN can gradually build up and populate the GIS database further than what will be possible under this assignment. 37. Based on the compiled data and the developed GIS database, the Vendor shall create maps that reflect existing findings on small hydro potential in Indonesia. This map will as much as possible include sites marked as having a high potential for small hydro. Page 8 of 17 Selection #1125330 Renewable Energy Mapping: Small Hydro – Indonesia 38. Spatial data collected by the Vendor, and which is judged by PLN as public, will need to be visualized and stored in the WB’s GIS platform. This platform will be able to display and analyze new data generated by the Vendor and as well as historical data from previous studies if this is made available. All spatial data will need to comply with the standards specified in Annex A. REVIEW OF SMALL HYDRO’S ROLE IN NTT, MALUKU, MALUKU UTARA, AND SULAWESI 39. Although one of the ideas of ESMAP’s small hydro mapping is ground-based monitoring of hydrology and geotechnical site investigations, these are too difficult to conduct in Indonesia within the time frame and budget because of the geographic characteristics with a large number of islands and very steep terrain. Instead the focus of the validation process in Activity 1 is on customizing the mapping of small hydro to the unique characteristics of the power grid in Indonesia, which is a result of the same difficult geographical characteristics. Populated remote areas are very costly to link to the main grid and the traditional mapping of hydro potential based on larger schemes connected to HV lines may not always be the best alternatives. 40. As a specific task in Activity 1, the Vendor shall therefore make a general review of the existing power generation and distribution situation in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi. This review shall focus on an assessment of general strengths and weaknesses of using small hydro to supply power for medium and small isolated systems that are based mainly on LV and MV lines. Possible solutions for identified challenges related to e.g. grid stability or low firm power during dry seasons shall be suggested. Possibilities of using small hydro in hybrid systems should generally be assessed from a technical perspective. REVIEW AND VALIDATION OF SMALL HYDRO POTENTIAL IN NTT, MALUKU, MALUKU UTARA, AND SULAWESI 41. The Vendor shall create an updated list of already identified potential for small hydro in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi. This would include the list of projects identified for the national map (Paragraph 32), but should also include site visits to all major wilayahs to find local knowledge and interests from private investors. The Vendor shall make an attempt to compile information on preliminary permits for hydropower at the local governments. 42. This list of small hydro potential in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi shall first be reviewed and prioritized in regard to reliability of data and traditional risks for hydro development. The overall potential capacity of the sites shall be reviewed taking into account hydrological risk. Cost estimates conducted in previous studies shall be reviewed to take into account geological, sediment, environmental, and social risks. Other factors, such as access, land ownership, protected and environmentally sensitive areas, military and other exclusion zones, and security issues, shall be considered. 43. The list of small hydro potential in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi shall secondly be reviewed considering the focus on supporting isolated grid systems (see Paragraph 40). Considerations such as local power demand, distance to MV or LV lines and local load centers shall be taken into account in prioritizing and designing these schemes optimally. At the time of the start of the assignment at the beginning of 2014, the power grid including 20 kV and 150 kV lines, as well as population and load centers, will be available in digitized format for NTT, Maluku, and , Maluku Utara. The digitizing of corresponding information for Sulawesi will be conducted in parallel with the Page 9 of 17 Selection #1125330 Renewable Energy Mapping: Small Hydro – Indonesia assignment as part of the parallel contract for updated Geospatial Electrification Planning and will only be available later in 2014. 44. The review and prioritization of all small hydro in the study will include very many schemes, despite only covering a part of Indonesia3. The review will thus have to be step-wise in which gradual screening is conducted as the review becomes more advanced. Site visits are only expected for a few sites. The Vendor shall in their Technical Proposal describe in detail how the screening and review process is planned to be done. 45. The review and prioritization of small hydro potential in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi shall result in a list of most promising small hydro to be developed to support electrification in these provinces. The Vendor shall give recommendations for further preparation studies, investigation and monitoring to support the development of these prioritized schemes. The Vendor shall use this latest data to update the national GIS database on small hydro potential. REPORTING AND ACTIVITY 1 WORKSHOP 46. The Vendor shall summarize the methods and results of the country-wide resource maps for small hydro into a draft Small Hydro Mapping Report. The report shall include maps created from GIS layers, and shall present existing information on small hydro in Indonesia. The methodology and results shall be presented in a transparent way. 47. As a separate report or an annex to the above Small Hydro Mapping Report, the Vendor shall document the detailed review and update of small hydro in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi. 48. The draft Activity 2 reports shall be ready and distributed at least two weeks ahead of a workshop to be held at the conclusion of Activity 2. The delivery shall have the format of stand-alone reports, slide pack, and relevant GIS layers. It shall be delivered in electronic format suitable for print and web publication. 49. Once draft Activity 1 outputs have been submitted and approved by the WB, the Vendor shall participate in a workshop held in Jakarta to present the results to the Client, get feedback from stakeholders, discuss next steps, and an introductory training in the use of the GIS tool for PLN staff. The Vendor’s Technical Proposal shall propose a format for this event. The Vendor should assume in their proposal that the Client and/or the WB will host the event, including provision of meeting room space, logistics, translation and sending of invitations. The Vendor’s proposal shall include the cost of their participation in this workshop including delivery of the training components. 50. Based on the feedback from the Workshop, the Vendor shall revise and finalize the Small Hydro Mapping Reports for approval by the WB in consultation with the Client. 3 As an indication for bidders on the number of gross sites for the study area, the 1999 Hydropower Master Plan lists 31 sites in Sulawesi, 29 sites in Maluku, and 97 sites in NTT with estimated capacity below 10 MW. Page 10 of 17 Selection #1125330 Renewable Energy Mapping: Small Hydro – Indonesia ACTIVITY 2: SUPPORT TO THE INCLUSION OF SMALL HYDRO POTENTIAL TO THE GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANNING FOR NTT, MALUKU, MALUKU UTARA, AND SULAWESI 51. The Vendor should coordinate with the parallel contract on Geospatial Electrification Planning. The latest tool version shall be reviewed in regard to including generation sources from small hydro. If found motivated, suggestions should be given on improvements in the tool configuration and algorithms to include small hydro potential. Such possible improvements shall be discussed, introduced and tested in liaison with the contractor for the Geospatial Electrification Planning. 52. The Vendor shall, based on the results of Activity 1, provide of a list of potential small hydro to be fed into the Geospatial Electrification Planning tool for NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi. The input data shall be in the form required by the Geospatial Electrification Tool. 53. During and after the Geospatial Electrification Tool, updated with small hydro potential, is applied to optimize electrification in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi, the Vendor shall work closely with the parallel project to review the interim and final results from a hydro generation point of view. 54. The Vendor shall further coordinate the final reporting of conducted work with the parallel contract to assure that the WB and the Client receives a complete description of the Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning process in Indonesia. The final report shall include policy recommendations on development of small hydro in Indonesia, based on the results and experience of the assignment. 55. The Vendor shall participate and contribute to a final workshop in Jakarta to present the final results for the Client and stakeholders. After the workshop the Final Reports shall be produced and delivered. The Vendor should assume in their proposal that the Client and/or the WB will host the event, including provision of meeting room space, logistics, translation and sending of invitations. The Vendor’s proposal shall include the cost of their participation in this workshop including delivery of presentations of results. OPTIONAL: TRAINING IN GIS AND SMALL HYDRO MAPPING AND VALIDATION 56. The Vendor shall as optional services propose capacity building of PLN to host, operate, maintain and expand the national GIS database on small hydro, which will be produced in this assignment. This will include provision of GIS hardware and software, training in its use and maintenance, and updating with new information including digitizing. Training may be for PLN staff based in the central office in Jakarta and in local wilayahs. 57. The Vendor shall also as optional services propose capacity building to PLN in the mapping and validation of small hydro for both grid connection and isolated systems. This should include training in the map studies and the key characteristics and risks with small hydro development. The training should be customized for Indonesian conditions and take into account the role of small hydro in grid-based and isolated systems. 58. The Vendor shall, if interested in providing the optional services, describe in the Technical Proposal a proposed methodology and format for training, including necessary equipment and software, Page 11 of 17 Selection #1125330 Renewable Energy Mapping: Small Hydro – Indonesia training material, workshops, on-the-job-training, etc. 59. The accompanied Financial Proposal, which will not be part of the evaluation of the bids, should as far as possible be based on unit rates to enable negotiation of final scope and volume of the services when available budget is known. 3. DELIVERABLES / SPECIFIC OUTPUTS EXPECTED FROM VENDOR 60. All deliverables shall be written in English and presented to the WB and the Client in electronic format suitable for online publication unless otherwise specified. Should the WB decide to print any of the outputs then this will be handled separately. 61. The main users of the deliverables are PLN, other governmental institutions, and private investors in small hydropower. ACTIVITY 1 DELIVERABLES 62. During Activity 1 the Vendor shall deliver the following: a) Inception Report on the pre-diagnostic of small hydro in Indonesia including detailed methodology b) A national small hydro resource database with statistics and relevant GIS. The GIS data should follow the guidelines described in Annex A. c) Small Hydro Mapping Report outlining national information on small hydro in Indonesia, including maps of existing, planned and potential schemes. d) A report/annex on small hydro potential in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi for both grid expansion and isolated systems. e) Inputs to the Activity 1 Workshop to be held in Jakarta, including introductory training in the small hydro GIS database. f) A list of prioritized small hydro development sites in NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi, including recommendations for further studies, investigation and monitoring to support the development of these schemes. ACTIVITY 2 DELIVERABLES 63. During Activity 2 the Vendor shall deliver the following: g) Recommendations on improvement of the existing Geospatial Electrification Planning tool to take into account small hydro potential. h) Input data on small hydro potential for the least cost geospatial electrification planning for NTT, Maluku, Maluku Utara, and Sulawesi. i) Updated final reporting coordinated with the parallel contract to give a complete description of the Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning process in Page 12 of 17 Selection #1125330 Renewable Energy Mapping: Small Hydro – Indonesia Indonesia. j) Inputs to the Final Workshop to be held in Jakarta to present the results to the Client. ANTICIPATED TIMELINE 64. The contract period for the Services is anticipated to be 22 months . It is anticipated to require 140 person weeks, of which approximately half is expected from associated local consultants. Indonesia Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning 2014 2015 Activity Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct ACTIVITY 1 Inception Phase Development and population of small hydro database Updated gross list of small hydro in NTT, Maluku and Sulawesi Review and validation of gross list Re-assessment of gross list for support to isolated systems Updated prioritized list Reporting and Workshop ACTIVITY 2 SUPPORT TO GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANNING Review of existing tool and input for NTT, Maluku and Sualwesi Review of results for eletrification planning in NTT, Maluku and Sulawesi Final reporting and final Workshop to present results PARALLEL CONTRACT ON GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANNING Extended digitizing of electrification grid systems in Sulawesi Improved Geospatial Electrification tool Updated Electrification Planning for NTT, Maluku and Sulawesi Final Workshop to present results and Final Report 65. If the Vendor feels that the timeline proposed above is unrealistic, or that meeting it will substantially increase costs, then they should propose an alternative timeline in their Technical Proposal and/or note any constraints on their side. 4. REQUIRED EXPERTISE OF VENDOR 66. The Vendor must present a multi-disciplinary team to provide services in accordance with these TOR. Because of the importance of local knowledge and the language challenges, it is required that the Vendor joins with a local partner firm to conduct the services. 67. The Vendor shall have the following key experts and team composition, which will be part of the technical evaluation. a. An experienced Team Leader with at least 15 years of hydropower planning and preparation, and with experience of small scale hydro development. b. A deputy Team Leader with at least 10 years of experience of power and hydropower development in Indonesia. c. A civil engineer with at least 10 years of experience in hydropower development d. An engineering geologist with at least 10 years of experience in hydropower development, and preferably experience in Indonesia. e. A hydrology and sediment expert with at least 10 years of experience in hydropower Page 13 of 17 Selection #1125330 Renewable Energy Mapping: Small Hydro – Indonesia development, and preferably experience in Indonesia. f. A Power System Engineer with at least 10 years of experience in planning of power systems. g. A GIS expert with at least 10 years of experience in building up GIS-based databases, preferably with experience from the power sector. h. An environmental and social expert with at least 10 years of hydropower development, and preferably experience in Indonesia. i. A local support team for data and information compilation, experienced in the power sector of Indonesia. 5. SPECIFIC INPUTS TO BE PROVIDED BY THE WORLD BANK 68. The WB and the Client will facilitate links to local agencies or other organizations for obtaining historical hydrological data and documentation for any previous ground-based measurements, to be provided at no cost where possible. 69. Central data repository and geo-portal for the long-term storage and access of all data and GIS layers generated under this project. 70. Guidance on the accepted political boundaries between Indonesia and neighboring countries. 6. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS / SPECIFIC CRITERIA 71. The evaluation of proposals will be conducted according to an 80:20 split between the Technical and Financial Proposals. 72. Technical Proposals will be evaluated against three criteria, as follows: i) The methodology, broken down into the activities that come under this RFP, and assessed according to methodological rigor, the appropriate sequencing of activities, the comprehensiveness of the approach with regard to quality standards, and the value added in terms of innovative approaches and/or improvements to the TOR. [40%] ii) The Vendor’s proposed team, assessed according to their combined and individual experience, the strength of their identified local partner(s), and appropriate balance between roles and use of senior/junior and international/local staff. [40%] iii) The comprehensiveness of the capacity building plan and training activities, proposed plan for engagement with Client and external stakeholders, and the flexibility of the Vendor in being willing and able to respond to changes during implementation. [20%] 73. The Vendor shall provide a Financial Proposal that conforms to the terms of the existing Indefinite Delivery Agreement (Framework Contract), and includes:  A fixed cost offer for the services as specified in the Scope of Work, broken down by deliverables. Page 14 of 17 Selection #1125330 Renewable Energy Mapping: Small Hydro – Indonesia  A fixed cost offer for any deliverables that are not listed in these TOR but that are being proposed by the Vendor in their Technical Proposal as optional additions to the Scope of Work. Any optional/additional deliverables shall be offered on a fixed cost basis and would be agreed upon in the contract negotiation phase or during project implementation.  A breakdown of personnel costs and estimated reimbursable expenses.  A proposed payment schedule against major milestones/deliverables, following an initial payment of 10% of the total on contract signing. 74. The Vendor is required to use the special template provided for their Financial Proposal (FINANCIAL PROPOSAL – Indonesia – Small Hydro Mapping Component A [Selection #1125330]) and disregard the standard ‘Financial Proposal Template’4. The Vendor shall provide their offer in the currency specified in their Indefinite Delivery Agreement, and alter the Financial Proposal accordingly. 75. All travel charged by the Vendor shall be for economy class flights via the most direct route; WB negotiated rates for hotel accommodation shall be used where possible5. All travel and subsistence shall be treated as a reimbursable expense but the Vendor shall provide estimated costs in their Financial Proposal and include this in their fixed price offer. 4 The correct document can be identified by the ESMAP logo in the top left hand corner. 5 Vendors shall base their calculations on the current rates as follows: $170/night for Jakarta, $72/night for all other locations. Page 15 of 17 Selection #1125330 Renewable Energy Mapping: Small Hydro – Indonesia ANNEX A: REQUIREMENTS FOR DATA, MAPS AND IMAGES NON-GEOGRAPHIC DATA All non-geographic data shall be made available in the following data formats for upload to a data repository, most likely via an Application Programming Interface (API) provided by the WB:  .csv (csv output from an excel file or see rfc 4180 for standard format)  .xls (Excel 97 and later)  .xlsx (2007 and later)  .tsv GEOGRAPHIC DATA All geographic data shall be delivered as shapefiles, file geodatabases, or other accepted OGC standard geographic formats. See http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards for a list of accepted formats. Preferred formats are shapefiles for vector data, and GeoTiff for raster data. See table below for some further details: DATASET FORMAT SPATIAL REFERENCE Vector Shapefile Geographic Coordinate System: GCS_WGS_1984 Datum: D_WGS_1984 Prime Meridian: Greenwich Angular Unit: Degree Raster Tiff, Grids, or Imagine Geographic Coordinate System: GCS_WGS_1984 Datum: D_WGS_1984 Prime Meridian: Greenwich Angular Unit: Degree Tabular .csv, .dbf or .xls XY coordinates must be in Decimal Degrees All files pertaining to the map creation, such as .mxd or .ai files shall be included in the delivery of the GIS data. In addition to the format requirements, all geographic data provided must be accompanied by detailed metadata as outlined in Annex A. The WB metadata standards are based on ISO 19115:2003 (Geographic Metadata Standards). IMAGES Mapping and other images shall be supplied with a 300 dpi density and lossless compression (PNG), suitable for professional printing. Mapping images will be reviewed by the World Bank’s GIS team before Page 16 of 17 Selection #1125330 Renewable Energy Mapping: Small Hydro – Indonesia going to publication to ensure cartographic quality and content. Images may be used by the World Bank for communications purposes. All photos shall be delivered in their original high-resolution format (raw or .jpg), preferably exif-tagged with GPS and timestamp. Page 17 of 17 GESTO ENERGIA S.A. Av. Cáceres Monteiro, nº 10, 1º Sul 1495-131 Algés, Portugal T. +351 211 579 899 F. +351 211 540 900 www.gestoenergy.com SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANNING INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – ANNEX II MEETING REPORTS July 2014 Copyright © 2014, Gesto Energia S.A. Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning Indonesia Project ID: P145273 Selection #: 1125330 Meeting Report Subject: Presentation meeting with PLN Head of New Date: March 25, 2014 and Renewable Energy Division Time: from 17h00 to 18h00 Ref.: ID.2014.AC.001.0 Local: PLN Pusat, Jl Trunojoyo Blok Number of pages: 1 M 1/135, Kebayoran Baru - 13th Drafted by: Joana Santos floor, Jakarta Participants:  Mr. Moch. Sofyan (PLN)  Mr. Sutiyo Siswanto (PLN)  Mr. Dhruva Sahai (WB)  Mr. Jorge André (GESTO)  Ms. Joana Santos (GESTO) Agenda: 1. Brief team and project presentation 2. Designation of the expected team counterpart 3. First interaction to approach client’s needs and impressions on small hydropower mapping 4. Schedule of follow-up comprehensive kick-off meeting Key notes:  The client will be PLN’s New and Renewable Energy Division and The World Bank  Mr. Sutiyo Siswanto will be the liaison counterpart of GESTO team in the project. The work will be approved by Mr. Moch. Sofyan  The capacity limit of small hydropower in the regulatory framework in Indonesia is 10 MW. The bounds on the scope of the study should be further discussed  A more in-depth presentation of the project was scheduled to March 27 Collected data:  No data was collected Next steps Task Responsible Date - - - 1 Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning Indonesia Project ID: P145273 Selection #: 1125330 Meeting Report Subject: Kick-off meeting with PLN New and Renewable Date: March 28, 2014 Energy Division Time: from 10h00 to 11h00 Ref.: ID.2014.AC.002.0 Local: PLN Pusat, Jl Trunojoyo Blok Number of pages: 3 M 1/135, Kebayoran Baru - 13th Drafted by: Joana Santos floor, Jakarta Participants:  Mr. Moch. Sofyan (PLN)  Mr. Sutiyo Siswanto (PLN)  Mr. Dhruva Sahai (WB)  Mr. Dhani Irwanto (IHC)  Mr. Chandra Adriawan (IHC)  Mr. Jorge André (GESTO)  Ms. Joana Santos (GESTO) Agenda: 1. Consortium presentation 2. ESMAP Framework for Small Hydropower 3. Methodology 4. Team and calendar 5. Next steps Key notes:  Mr. Jorge André carried out the presentation of the project, detailing the methodology to be worked out during the inception phase to meet PLN requirements  According to PLN, there is already some identified potential, but mainly on large hydro  PLN will provide studies on small hydropower (list of projects). GESTO will request the information, along with other identified datasets  PLN is interested in a screening process to apply to their current small hydropower requests, for which Mr. Sofyan gave some screening examples  PLN will establish an Internal Basic Communication regarding the project. This will allow for the elaboration of a roadmap of other PLN divisions to be contacted  PLN will define a Team Counterpart to support the project  GESTO will require PLN’s assistance to contact external governmental agencies/institutions relevant to the project, such as: i. Ministry of Forestry 1 Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning Indonesia Project ID: P145273 Selection #: 1125330 Meeting Report ii. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources iii. Ministry of Public Works iv. Indonesia Agency for Meteorological, Climatological and Geophysics (BMKG) v. BIG A presentation letter should be prepared by PLN for GESTO’s use  Regarding BIG information, PLN already has part of the datasets acquired for the parallel contract on the Geospatial Electrification Planning Tool. The same information is required by GESTO, which will follow the usual confidentiality and data protection Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) used by PLN for this purpose  PLN would like the proposed training within the project to be included in PLN’s Renewable Academy Training  The inclusion of small hydropower potential on existing dams (for non-hydropower purposes) was suggested by PLN. GESTO thinks it is feasible within the project if agreed by The World Bank  GESTO will need to carry out an assessment of PLN’s current GIS capabilities regarding software use, hosting capacity and proficiency of users  Mr. Siswanto will be out of Jakarta during the week of April 1. GESTO will need his diligences and guidance for the first steps of the project. A meeting should be schedule upon his return to Jakarta. During the week of April 1 GESTO will proceed to the meetings with Foreign Agencies (JICA, USAID, ADB, …) Collected data:  No data was collected Next steps Task Responsible Date File sending – Project presentation GESTO April 1 Data and info request GESTO April 1 New Meeting request GESTO Week April 7 Contacting Foreign Agencies relevant to the project GESTO April 1 Contacting external governmental GESTO agencies/institutions relevant to the project upon TBD receipt of Project Presentation Letter Assessment of PLN’s current GIS capabilities GESTO Week April 7 Establishment of Internal Basic Communication PLN Week April 1 Definition of PLN’s Team Counterpart to support the PLN Week April 1 project Provision of data/info/studies on small hydropower PLN Week April 7 (list of projects, hydropower masterplans, etc.) 2 Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning Indonesia Project ID: P145273 Selection #: 1125330 Next steps Task Responsible Date Preparation of Project Presentation Letter and PLN Week April 1 assistance contacting external agencies MoU for the provision of BIG data acquired by PLN for PLN/GESTO Week April 7 GESTO’s use Grant GESTO access to PLN’s IT, New Energies and PLN System Planning GIS users for the assessment of PLN’s Week April 7 current GIS capabilities 3 Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning Indonesia Project ID: P145273 Selection #: 1125330 Meeting Report Subject: Meeting with USAD ICED Date: April 2, 2014 Ref.: ID.2014.AC.003.0 Time: from 12h30 to 14h00 Number of pages: 2 Local: Tifa Building, Suite 504 Drafted by: Joana Santos Jalan Kuningan Barat 26 Jakarta Selatan 12710 Indonesia Participants:  Mr. Bill Meade (USAID ICED)  Mr. Farid Siregar (USAID ICED)  Mr. Raymond Bona (USAID ICED)  Mr. Jorge André (GESTO)  Ms. Joana Santos (GESTO) Agenda: 1. Small Hydropower Mapping project presentation 2. USAID ICED project presentation on hydropower mapping and project development 3. Assessment of the possible points of cooperation Key notes:  Mr. Bill Meade made a brief introduction to the work being carried out by USAID-ICED  Mr. Jorge André carried out the presentation of the project, detailing the methodology to be worked out during the inception phase to meet PLN requirements  Mr. Farid Siregar made a presentation of the hydropower validation USAID – ICED is currently performing. He mentioned that ASTER Digital Elevation Model for Indonesia is accurate enough for preliminary studies.  Mr. Raymond Bona presented the actual licensing process flow chart  Mr. Bill Meade identified some consequences of the actual licensing process – very competitive, but a project with a PPA doesn’t mean a feasible project. As an outcome, there are several IPP requests and granted PPA’s. Some of the PPA’s may never be built and block other feasible projects. Moreover, because of competitiveness, confidentiality is required in the project development. As a consequence, PLN only gets to know the location of those projects when the PPA is requested. Moreover, the PPA is conceded for 20 years, but the local permit has no expiration date.  USAID-ICED is open to share info with the ESMAP initiative but a formal request has to be made between ESMPA and USAID. 1 Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning Indonesia Project ID: P145273 Selection #: 1125330 Meeting Report Collected data:  No data was collected Next steps Task Responsible Date GESTO and File sending – Project presentations Week April 1 USAID ICED Request WB/ESMAP a letter for cooperation between the two agencies (WB and USAID) in order to request GESTO Week April 7 USAID public information Inform PLN of data sharing between Tetratech and GESTO Week April 7 GESTO 2 Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning Indonesia Project ID: P145273 Selection #: 1125330 Meeting Report Subject: Meeting with ADB-ICED Date: April 3, 2014 Ref.: ID.2014.AC.004.0 Time: from 08h00 to 09h00 Number of pages: 1 Local: Gedung BRI II, 7th Floor, Jl. Jend. Sudirman Drafted by: Joana Santos Kav. 44-46, Jakarta 10210, Indonesia Participants:  Mr. Bagus Mudiantoro (ADB)  Mrs. Joy Lopes (ADB)  Mr. Chandra Adriawan (IHC)  Mr. Jorge André (GESTO)  Ms. Joana Santos (GESTO) Agenda: 1. Small hydropower mapping project presentation 2. Assess ADB work on hydropower Key notes:  Mr. Jorge André made a brief introduction to the project  Ms. Joana Santos carried out the presentation of the project, referring the methodology and highlighting the expected results (GIS database and list of most promising sites)  Mr. Bagus Mundiantoro made some considerations regarding ADB’s projects and referred ADB has some projects in operation in Sulawesi and NTT and mentioned some of the difficulties (forestry, possible conflict with other PPAs, …)  Mr. Bagus Mundiantoro mentioned that the reference cost per MW on the developed hydro projects is close to $4M/MW  GESTO will request the information to ADB related to their projects Collected data:  No data was collected Next steps Task Responsible Date File sending – Project presentation GESTO April 4 Request of data/info/studies on small hydropower (list GESTO April 4 of projects, studies, costs etc.) 1 Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning Indonesia Project ID: P145273 Selection #: 1125330 Meeting Report Subject: Work Meeting with PLN Date: April 7, 2014 Ref.: ID.2014.AC.005.0 Time: from 10h00 to 11h30 Number of pages: 2 Local: PLN Pusat, Jl Trunojoyo Blok Drafted by: Joana Santos M 1/135, Kebayoran Baru - 13th floor, Jakarta Participants:  Mr. Sutiyo Siswanto (PLN)  Mr. Rois Ahmad Anafi (PLN)  Mr. Dhruva Sahai (WB)  Mr. Chandra Adriawan (IHC)  Mr. Jorge André (GESTO)  Ms. Joana Santos (GESTO) Agenda: 1. Status report 2. Operation of the data collection task Key notes:  Mr. Jorge André made a brief Status report on the inception mission, referring the meetings held during the previous week (USAID-ICED, ADB), pointing out that the main source of information is PLN. In summary, the basic communication and a focal point is essential at this stage. The database that PLN currently works needs to be assessed, as well as the current GIS and database capabilities  Mr. Siswanto invited Mr. Rois Ahmad Anafi to the meeting, as the person responsible for the update of the current database. Mr. Rois will be the person who may explain the contents and the current procedures  Mr. Siswanto and Mr. Anafi explained that the database actually has around 800 MW on more than 200 sites. The database has some points with coordinates.  The IPP requests on the database are analyzed taking into consideration the potential of the stream. The potential is nowadays assessed by the JICA studies (1999 and 2011). The JICA studies has 349 locations, of which 167 locations pass the 1st screening, to a total of 21 480 MW. In the 3rd screening process only 89 locations were left. Those 89 locations where updated in the 2011 study. The consulting engineering company that developed the studies was Nipon KOEI.  Data regarding the energy output of operating hydropower schemes is under the 1 Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning Indonesia Project ID: P145273 Selection #: 1125330 Meeting Report Operation Director, probably in the regional areas. This information was requested by GESTO  In the end of the meeting, GESTO had the opportunity to see the hydropower database and the mapinfo database, shown by Mr. Anafi. GESTO inquired about the process of accepting a request, which was explained Mr. Buddhi, that joined the discussion by suggestion of Mr. Anafi.  GESTO will be at PLN the next day to continue the operationalization of all the data collection Collected data:  No data was collected Next steps Task Responsible Date Provide GESTO the database of IPP requests and PLN Mr. Siswanto Week April 7 studies (subject to superior approval) Provide GESTO the Mapinfo database with the JICA Mr. Siswanto Week April 7 study (subject to superior approval) Check PLN’s capabilities within the IT department or Mr. Siswanto Week April 7 appoint meeting. Provide GESTO the information on the monthly energy output and related monthly capacity of the Mr. Siswanto Week April 7 hydropower plant or appoint meeting Facilitate GESTO’s access to other public stakeholders (Ministry of Public Works, Ministry of Energy and Mr. Siswanto Week April 7 Ministry of Forestry) Inform GESTO of existing non-hydropower dams to be Mr. Siswanto Week April 7 included in the study Mr. Jorge André Request the System Planning the BIG data used in the and Mr. Dhruva Week April 7 parallel contract (Earth Institute – GEP tool) Sahai 2 Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning Indonesia Project ID: P145273 Selection #: 1125330 Meeting Report Subject: Meeting with JICA Date: April 7, 2014 Ref.: ID.2014.AC.006.0 Time: from 14h00 to 15h00 Number of pages: 2 Local: JICA Indonesia Office Drafted by: Joana Santos Sentral Senayan II, 14th floor Jl Asia Afrika No. 8 Jakarta 10270 Participants:  Mr. Juraku Masahiro (JICA)  Mr. Chandra Adriawan (IHC)  Mr. Jorge André (GESTO)  Ms. Joana Santos (GESTO) Agenda: 1. Small hydropower mapping project presentation 2. Assess JICA work on hydropower Key notes:  Mr. Jorge André made a brief introduction to the project and carried out the presentation of the project, referring the methodology and highlighting the expected results (GIS database and list of most promising sites);  Mr. Jorge André referred that up to this date the most comprehensive study of hydropower in Indonesia was funded by JICA, which GESTO had the opportunity to assess in PLN Pusat (both the hardcopy and the database from the study of 1999). The study was updated in 2011. Mr. Jorge André asked if it would be possible to have softcopies of both of the studies;  Mr. Juraku Masahiro referred that the 2011 study is available in JICA online library. The links will be sent. About the study from 1999, Mr. Juraku Masahiro will inquire about the softcopy availability. The studies were developed by NIPON KOEI  Currently, JICA is developing individual projects: transmission lines, clean coal projects, large and small hydropower plants. Regarding SHPP, there are 2 t o3 candidate projects, all in Sumatra. Some of those projects already have the PPA waiting for financial close;  Mr. Juraku Masahiro referred that if the results of the project “Small Hydropower Mapping in Indonesia” were made public, it could allow a better cooperation with the private sector. 1 Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning Indonesia Project ID: P145273 Selection #: 1125330 Meeting Report Collected data:  No data was collected Next steps Task Responsible Date File sending – Project presentation Mr. Jorge André Week April 7 File sending – Hydropower Master Plan Mr. Juraku Week April 7 (1999 and 2011) Masahiro 2 Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning Indonesia Project ID: P145273 Selection #: 1125330 Meeting Report Subject: Meeting with GIZ Date: April 8, 2014 Ref.: ID.2014.AC.007.0 Time: from 14h00 to 15h00 Number of pages: 2 Local: GIZ/EnDev Indonesia Drafted by: Jorge André MHP Technical Support Unit Office Jakarta Jl. Tebet Barat VIII No. 52 Jakarta Selatan 12810 Participants:  Ms. Amalia Suryani (GIZ)  Ms. Erwina Darmajanti (GIZ)  Mr. Ricky Ariwibowo (GIZ)  Mr. Chandra Adriawan (IHC)  Mr. Jorge André (GESTO) Agenda: 1. Consortium presentation 2. ESMAP Framework for Small Hydropower 3. Methodology 4. Calendar 5. Present day Key notes:  Mr. Jorge André made a brief introduction to the project and carried out the presentation of the project, referring the methodology and highlighting the expected results (GIS database and list of most promising sites);  Mr. Jorge André explained that ESMAP’s Small Hydropower Mapping Project is currently under its Inception Phase and therefore it is important to speak with as many relevant stakeholders as possible. The main objective of this meeting is to assess relevant info on hydropower in Indonesia and evaluate possible ways of cooperation. The required info is centered on the following topics: development of the sector, current projects, list of projects existing GIS datasets, existing hydro data and lessons learnt;  Mr. Jorge André mentioned that even though the focus of ESMAP’s project is small hydro (typically between 1 and 10 MW in capacity), other ranges of hydropower projects will be extremely welcome on the database creation. Ms. Amalia Suryani replied that GIZ projects currently range from 5 to 200 kW; 1 Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning Indonesia Project ID: P145273 Selection #: 1125330 Meeting Report  Ms. Amalia Suryani was interested in knowing how the beneficiary and choice of provinces to detail the project was chosen;  Ms. Amalia Suryani mentioned that GIZ mainly provides technically support after commissioning and most projects are funded by the Government (through the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, their counterpart) also other programs by other ministries and the projects locally funded by the community. This support comprises technical review, training plant operators and managers, and monitoring. The projects themselves are not owned by GIZ;  Ms. Amalia Suryani stated that GIZ has been supporting 297 small scale projects, of which 185 are micro hydro and the rest are PV mini-grids. Currently in the pipeline there are over 100 MHP and 119 PV mini-grids to be supported. Mr. Ricky Ariwibowo stated that GIZ is currently developing a web database (with interactive presentation called RE-MAP) with these projects, though not in GIS format (using MapFactor), that should be available by the end of the month;  Mr. Jorge André concluded requesting the possibility to include the GIZ database on ESMAP’s project.  GIZ will first internally discuss this request. Collected data:  No data was collected Next steps Task Responsible Date File sending – Project presentation Mr. Jorge André April 8 Evaluate possible provision of GIZ database on micro GIZ April hydro for incorporation in ESMAP’s database Inform GESTO of the publishing of RE-MAP’s website GIZ asap 2 GESTO ENERGIA S.A. Av. Cáceres Monteiro, nº 10, 1º Sul 1495-131 Algés, Portugal T. +351 211 579 899 F. +351 211 540 900 www.gestoenergy.com SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANNING INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – ANNEX III DATA AND INFO REQUIREMENTS July 2014 Copyright © 2014, Gesto Energia S.A. Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning Indonesia Project ID: P145273 Selection #: 1125330 DATA AND INFO REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING PROJECT: SMALL HYDROPOWER DATABASE (in order of priority)  All available Hydropower Masterplans (or Project Identification Studies)  List and characteristics1 of hydropower plants including (but not limited to): o PLN’s internal reference ID o Exact location (latitude, longitude and system of coordinates) o Administrative setting (island, province, district, …) o Status of the project (existing, under construction, new or future) o Ownership of the project (PLN or IPP’s) o Type of existing studies for the site (Masterplans, pre-feasibility, feasibility study, design studies, …) o Hydrological info (river, main river basin, mean annual flow, existence of stream gauge stations) o Energetic features (capacity, mean annual generation output, mean annual hours of output, …) o Transmission and distribution features (type of grid connection, population to supply, demand forecast for the region, …) o Scheme features (type and dimensions of dam, type of powerplant, channel/penstock dimensions, type of storage, …) o Technical features (head, design flow, ecological flow, number of groups, mean water level, intake level, outtake level, storage, submerged area, …) o Financial and economical features (estimated investment costs, Levelized Costs of Electricity, IRR, existing tariff, O&M costs, …) The above is a tentative list, subject to customization with PLN’s current database  Temporal datasets and corresponding data at PLN’s database: o Stream gauge stations (runoff/flow) o Meteorological stations (rainfall and temperature)  Spatial datasets (shapefiles or maps): o Electrical grid (from 20 kV upwards) o Protected areas and forestry o Land use o Road and Railways network o Available Isohyet and isotherm o Property of land (stated owned/private sector) 1 For instance on the form of an excel spreadsheet and/or shapefile or .kmz 1 Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning Indonesia Project ID: P145273 Selection #: 1125330  Legal Framework: o Environmental legislation to be taken into consideration o Hydropower licensing process description o Major issues/concerns/gaps that the Division has identified in the small hydropower development GIS CAPABILITIES GIS capabilities shall be assessed at two levels within PLN’s organization – vertically at the Information Technology Department (IT) and horizontally at two Divisions – New Energy and System Planning: IT Department:  Servers characteristics and hosting and storage availability  Existence of IT personnel experienced in databases for geographical information data  Representative examples of the hardware used by the users New Energy and System Planning Divisions:  Approximated number of people currently using geospatial information – (kml, kmz, shapefiles, geodatabases) or geospatial software (google earth, arcgis, quantum gis, mapinfo, small world …)  Skills and previous training of the users  Representative examples of the hardware used by the users 2 Small Hydropower Mapping and Improved Geospatial Electrification Planning Indonesia Project ID: P145273 Selection #: 1125330 DATA AND INFO REQUIREMENTS FROM OTHER INSTITUTIONS (PRIORITY INFO): FROM DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES (MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS)  List and characteristics1 of existing dams (but not limited to): o Exact location (latitude, longitude and system of coordinates) o Administrative setting (island, province, district, …) o Status of the project (existing, under construction, new or future) o Ownership of the project o Hydrological info (river, main river basin, mean annual flow, existence of stream gauge stations) o Energetic features (capacity, mean annual generation output, mean annual hours of output, …) o Transmission and distribution features (type of grid connection, population to supply, demand forecast for the region, …) o Scheme features (type and dimensions of dam, type of storage, …) o Technical features (head, design flow, ecological flow, mean water level, intake level, outtake level, storage, submerged area, historical monthly data of water level and water consumption, …) The above is a tentative list  Temporal datasets: o Stream gauge stations (runoff/flow) - daily and monthly series  Legal Framework: o Environmental legislation to be taken into consideration o Dam licensing process description FROM BADAN INFORMASI GEOSPASIAL (BIG) DATA FOR THE REGIONS OF NTT, MALUKU, MALUKU UTARA AND SULAWESI  Vector format: o Contour data o Streams and rivers o Administrative boundaries o Settlements and population  Raster format: o Topographic maps 1 For instance on the form of an excel spreadsheet and/or shapefile or .kmz 1 GESTO ENERGIA S.A. Av. Cáceres Monteiro, nº 10, 1º Sul 1495-131 Algés, Portugal T. +351 211 579 899 F. +351 211 540 900 www.gestoenergy.com SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANNING INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – ANNEX IV HYDROPOWER PLANTS IN OPERATION July 2014 Copyright © 2014, Gesto Energia S.A. SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF HYDROPOWER PLANTS IN OPERATION IN RUPTL ......................................................................................................... 1 HYDROPOWER PLANTS IN OPERATION IN RUPTL MAPS ........................................................................................................... 5 INDONESIA HYDROPOWER ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 JAWA-BALI REGION ...................................................................................................................................................................... 9 BANTEN PROVINCE ................................................................................................................................................................ 10 JAWA BARAT PROVINCE ........................................................................................................................................................ 11 JAWA TENGAH PROVINCE ..................................................................................................................................................... 12 JAWA TIMUR PROVINCE ........................................................................................................................................................ 13 KALIMANTAN REGION ................................................................................................................................................................ 15 KALIMANTAN BARAT PROVINCE ............................................................................................................................................ 16 KALIMANTAN SELATAN PROVINCE ........................................................................................................................................ 17 NUSA TENGGARA REGION .......................................................................................................................................................... 19 NUSA TENGGARA BARAT PROVINCE ..................................................................................................................................... 20 NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR PROVINCE ..................................................................................................................................... 21 PAPUA REGION ........................................................................................................................................................................... 23 PAPUA PROVINCE .................................................................................................................................................................. 24 SULAWESI REGION ...................................................................................................................................................................... 25 GORONTALO PROVINCE......................................................................................................................................................... 26 SULAWESI BARAT PROVINCE ................................................................................................................................................. 27 SULAWESI SELATAN PROVINCE ............................................................................................................................................. 28 SULAWESI TENGAH PROVINCE .............................................................................................................................................. 29 SULAWESI TENGGARA PROVINCE .......................................................................................................................................... 30 SULAWESI UTARA PROVINCE ................................................................................................................................................. 31 SUMATERA REGION .................................................................................................................................................................... 33 ACEH PROVINCE ..................................................................................................................................................................... 34 BENGKULU PROVINCE ........................................................................................................................................................... 35 LAMPUNG PROVINCE ............................................................................................................................................................ 36 RIAU PROVINCE ..................................................................................................................................................................... 37 SUMATERA BARAT PROVINCE ............................................................................................................................................... 38 SUMATERA SELATAN PROVINCE ............................................................................................................................................ 39 SUMATERA UTARA PROVINCE ............................................................................................................................................... 40 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV List of hydropower plants in operation in RUPTL 1 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV Table 1 - List of hydropower plants in operation in RUPTL. Province Name Type Capacity (MW) Bengkulu Lebong # 1 PLTA 4,0 Bengkulu Lebong # 2 PLTA 4,0 Bengkulu Lebong # 3 PLTA 4,0 Bengkulu Musi # 1 PLTA 71,0 Bengkulu Musi # 2 PLTA 71,0 Bengkulu Musi # 3 PLTA 71,0 Bengkulu Tess # 1 PLTA 0,6 Bengkulu Tess # 2 PLTA 0,6 Bengkulu Tess # 3 PLTA 4,4 Bengkulu Tess # 4 PLTA 4,4 Bengkulu Tess # 5 PLTA 4,4 Bengkulu Tess # 6 PLTA 4,4 Bengkulu Tess Extention PLTA 4,4 Jawa Barat Bengkok PLTA 3,2 Jawa Barat Cikalong PLTA 19,2 Jawa Barat Cirata PLTA 1008,0 Jawa Barat Dago PLTA 0,7 Jawa Barat Jatiluhur PLTA 150,0 Jawa Barat Kracak PLTA 18,9 Jawa Barat Lamajan PLTA 19,6 Jawa Barat Parakan PLTA 9,9 Jawa Barat Plengan PLTA 6,9 Jawa Barat Saguling PLTA 700,7 Jawa Barat Ubrug PLTA 18,4 Jawa Tengah Gerung PLTA 26,4 Jawa Tengah Jelok PLTA 20,5 Jawa Tengah Kedung Ombo PLTA 22,5 Jawa Tengah Ketenger PLTA 8,0 Jawa Tengah Lambu PLTA 1,2 Jawa Tengah Mrica PLTA 180,9 Jawa Tengah Pengkol PLTA 1,4 Jawa Tengah Selorejo PLTA 1,4 Jawa Tengah Sempor PLTA 1,0 Jawa Tengah Timo PLTA 12,0 Jawa Tengah Wadas Lintang PLTA 18,0 Jawa Tengah Wonogiri PLTA 12,4 Jawa Timur Karang Kates PLTA 105,0 Jawa Timur Ledoyo PLTA 4,5 Jawa Timur Madiun PLTA 8,1 Jawa Timur Mendalan PLTA 23,0 Jawa Timur Selorejo PLTA 4,5 Jawa Timur Sengguruh PLTA 29,0 Jawa Timur Siman PLTA 10,8 Jawa Timur Tulung Agung PLTA 36,0 Jawa Timur Wlingi PLTA 54,0 Kalimantan Barat Merasap System 2,0 Kalimantan Selatan Riam Kanan (Moh Noor) System 30 Lampung Batutegi # 1 PLTA 14,2 Lampung Batutegi # 2 PLTA 14,2 Lampung Besai # 1 PLTA 45,0 3 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV Province Name Type Capacity (MW) Lampung Besai # 2 PLTA 45,0 Riau Kotopanjang # 1 PLTA 38,0 Riau Kotopanjang # 2 PLTA 38,0 Riau Kotopanjang # 3 PLTA 38,0 Sulawesi Selatan Bakaru 1 PLTA 63,0 Sulawesi Selatan Bakaru 2 PLTA 63,0 Sulawesi Selatan Balla PLTM 0,7 Sulawesi Selatan Bili Bili PLTA 20,0 Sulawesi Selatan Kalukku PLTM 1,3 Sulawesi Selatan Malea PLTA 7,0 Sulawesi Selatan Poso 1 PLTA 65,0 Sulawesi Selatan Poso 2 PLTA 65,0 Sulawesi Selatan Poso 3 PLTA 65,0 Sulawesi Selatan Sawitto PLTM 1,0 Sulawesi Selatan Tangka Manipi PLTA 10,0 Sumatera Barat Batang Agam # 1 PLTA 3,5 Sumatera Barat Batang Agam # 2 PLTA 3,5 Sumatera Barat Batang Agam # 3 PLTA 3,5 Sumatera Barat Lubuk Gadang PLTMH 7,5 Sumatera Barat Mangani PLTMH 1,17 Sumatera Barat Maninjau # 1 PLTA 17,0 Sumatera Barat Maninjau # 2 PLTA 17,0 Sumatera Barat Maninjau # 3 PLTA 17,0 Sumatera Barat Maninjau # 4 PLTA 17,0 Sumatera Barat Napal Melintang PLTMH 0,58 Sumatera Barat Pinang Awan PLTMH 0,4 Sumatera Barat Salido Kecil PLTMH 0,3 Sumatera Barat Singkarak # 1 PLTA 43,8 Sumatera Barat Singkarak # 2 PLTA 43,8 Sumatera Barat Singkarak # 3 PLTA 43,8 Sumatera Barat Singkarak # 4 PLTA 43,8 Sumatera Utara Asahan I.1 PLTA 90,0 Sumatera Utara Asahan I.2 PLTA 90,0 Sumatera Utara Hutaraja PLTMH 5,0 Sumatera Utara INALUM PLTA 45,0 Sumatera Utara KARAI 13 PLTMH 5,0 Sumatera Utara Lau Renun #1 PLTA 41,0 Sumatera Utara Lau Renun #2 PLTA 41,0 Sumatera Utara Pandan PLTMH 7,6 Sumatera Utara Parlilitan PLTMH 7,5 Sumatera Utara Parluasan PLTMH 5,0 Sumatera Utara Sei Silau 2 PLTMH 8,0 Sumatera Utara Sipansihaporas #1 PLTA 33,0 Sumatera Utara Sipansihaporas #2 PLTA 17,0 4 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV Hydropower plants in operation in RUPTL maps 5 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV INDONESIA HYDROPOWER 7 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV JAWA-BALI REGION 9 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV BANTEN PROVINCE 10 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV JAWA BARAT PROVINCE 11 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV JAWA TENGAH PROVINCE 12 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV JAWA TIMUR PROVINCE 13 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV 14 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV KALIMANTAN REGION 15 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV KALIMANTAN BARAT PROVINCE 16 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV KALIMANTAN SELATAN PROVINCE 17 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV 18 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV NUSA TENGGARA REGION 19 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV NUSA TENGGARA BARAT PROVINCE 20 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR PROVINCE 21 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV 22 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV PAPUA REGION 23 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV PAPUA PROVINCE 24 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV SULAWESI REGION 25 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV GORONTALO PROVINCE 26 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV SULAWESI BARAT PROVINCE 27 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV SULAWESI SELATAN PROVINCE 28 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV SULAWESI TENGAH PROVINCE 29 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV SULAWESI TENGGARA PROVINCE 30 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV SULAWESI UTARA PROVINCE 31 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV 32 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV SUMATERA REGION 33 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV ACEH PROVINCE 34 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV BENGKULU PROVINCE 35 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV LAMPUNG PROVINCE 36 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV RIAU PROVINCE 37 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV SUMATERA BARAT PROVINCE 38 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV SUMATERA SELATAN PROVINCE 39 ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex IV SUMATERA UTARA PROVINCE 40 ID.2014.R001.0 GESTO ENERGIA S.A. Av. Cáceres Monteiro, nº 10, 1º Sul 1495-131 Algés, Portugal T. +351 211 579 899 F. +351 211 540 900 www.gestoenergy.com SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANNING INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – ANNEX V LIST OF HYDROPOWER PROJECTS IN RUPTL 2013-2022 July 2014 Copyright © 2014, Gesto Energia S.A. SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex VI List of Hydropower Projects in RUPTL 2013-2022 i ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex VI Table 1 - List of Hydropower Projects in RUPTL 2013-2022. Province Project Type Capacity (MW) Year of Operation Aceh PLTM Tersebar Aceh PLTM 65.0 2014-2015-2016 Peusangan 1-2 PLTA 88.0 2017 Peusangan-4 (FTP2) PLTA 83.0 2020 Meurebo-2 PLTM 59.0 2020 Bali Muara PLTM 1.0 2016 Telagawaja PLTM 4.0 2016 Sambangan PLTM 2.0 2016 Ayung PLTM 2.0 2017 Tukad Daya PLTM 8.0 2017 Sunduwati PLTM 2.0 2017 Telagawaja Ayu PLTM 1.0 2017 Banten Cisono PLTM 3.0 2014 Cikotok PLTM 4.0 2014 Situmulya PLTM 3.0 2014 Cikidang PLTM 2.0 2016 Cisimeut PLTM 2.0 2016 Cisungsang II PLTM 3.0 2016 Karang Ropong (Cibareno 1) PLTM 5.0 2016 Bulakan PLTM 10.0 2016 Cidano PLTM 2.0 2016 Cibareno PLTM 3.0 2017 Cisiih Leutik PLTM 4.0 2017 Nagajaya PLTM 6.0 2017 Bengkulu Kepla Curup (Barata) PLTMH 0.5 2013 Kepla Curup (Toshiba) PLTMH 1.0 2013 Ketahun-3 PLTA 61.0 2021 Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (DIY) Bayu Samas PLT 50.0 2015 Gorontalo Taludaa I PLTM 3.0 2015 Jambi Merangin PLTA 350.0 2021 Jawa Barat Cikaso PLTM 5.0 2013 Sindang Cai PLTM 1.0 2014 Cirompang PLTM 8.0 2014 Cianten 2 PLTM 5.0 2015 Cibatarua PLTM 5.0 2015 Cianten 1 PLTM 2.0 2015 Cibalapulang PLTM 9.0 2015 Cilaki PLTM 7.0 2015 Cilaki 1B PLTM 10.0 2015 Cimandiri PLTM 3.0 2015 Pakenjeng Bawah PLTM 6.0 2015 Cikopo-2 PLTM 6.0 2015 Cicatih PLTM 6.0 2015 Cisanggiri PLTM 3.0 2016 Cijampang 1 PLTM 1.0 2016 Cibalapulang-2 PLTM 7.0 2016 Cibalapulang-3 PLTM 6.0 2016 Cikaniki 1 PLTM 3.0 2016 Cikaniki 2 PLTM 3.0 2016 Cilaki 1A PLTM 3.0 2016 Pakenjeng Atas PLTM 4.0 2016 Kalapa Nunggal PLTM 3.0 2016 iii ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex VI Province Project Type Capacity (MW) Year of Operation Jawa Barat Pusaka-1 PLTM 9.0 2016 Ciasem PLTM 3.0 2016 Cikaengan PLTM 3.0 2016 Pusaka-3 PLTM 3.0 2016 Cikandang PLTM 6.0 2016 Caringin PLTM 4.0 2016 Ciarinem PLTM 3.0 2016 Jatigede (FTP2) PLTA 55.0 2017 Jatigede (FTP2) PLTA 55.0 2017 Upper Cisokan Pump Storage (FTP2) PS 260.0 2017 Upper Cisokan Pump Storage (FTP2) PS 260.0 2017 Upper Cisokan Pump Storage (FTP2) PS 260.0 2017 Upper Cisokan Pump Storage (FTP2) PS 260.0 2017 Rajamandala PLTA 47.0 2017 Cianten 1B PLTM 6.0 2017 Cianten 3 PLTM 6.0 2017 Cikaengan-2 PLTM 7.0 2017 Cikawung Bawah PLTM 3.0 2017 Cikawung Atas PLTM 5.0 2017 Cibuni PLTM 3.0 2017 Jawa Tengah Adipasir 3 PLTM 0.3 2013 KInc.ang PLTM 0.3 2013 Singgi PLTM 0.2 2013 Merden PLTM 0.4 2013 Kunci Putih PLTM 1.0 2014 Logawa Sunyalangu PLTM 1.5 2014 Banyubiru PLTM 0.2 2014 Logawa Baseh PLTM 3.0 2015 Banjaran Kebonmanis PLTM 2.2 2015 Logawa Babakan PLTM 1.3 2015 Logawa Baseh Karangpelem PLTM 1.9 2015 Palumbungan PLTM 1.6 2016 Gelang PLTM 0.3 2016 Bendosari PLTM 4.0 2016 Pugeran PLTM 6.0 2016 Adipasir 1 PLTM 0.3 2016 Adipasir 2 PLTM 0.3 2016 Ambal PLTM 2.1 2016 Banyumlayu PLTM 0.5 2016 Pagarpelah PLTM 3.2 2016 Serayu PLTM 8.6 2016 Gunung Wugul PLTM 3.0 2016 Timbangreja PLTM 0.4 2016 Preng-1 PLTM 1.8 2017 Preng-2 PLTM 4.5 2017 Tulis PLTM 9.0 2017 Harjosari PLTM 9.9 2017 Lambur PLTM 8.0 2017 Prukut Sambirata PLTM 1.5 2017 Dadapayam PLTM 3.0 2017 Binangun PLTM 3.8 2017 Jimat PLTM 0.5 2017 Damar PLTM 2.1 2017 Pageruyung PLTM 4.4 2017 iv ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex VI Province Project Type Capacity (MW) Year of Operation Jawa Tengah Matenggeng PS PS 225.0 2020 Matenggeng PS PS 225.0 2020 Matenggeng PS PS 225.0 2021 Matenggeng PS PS 225.0 2021 Jawa Timur Pacet PLTM 2.0 2016 Lodoyo PLTM 10.0 2017 Jompo 1 (Jompo Atas) PLTM 2.0 2017 Jompo 2 (Jompo Bawah) PLTM 3.0 2017 Kali Tengah (Sungai Tengah) PLTM 1.0 2017 Balelo PLTM 4.0 2017 Ketajek PLTM 3.0 2017 Zeelandia PLTM 2.0 2017 Karangkates #4-5 PLTA 100.0 2019 Kalikonto-2 PLTA 62.0 2019 Kesamben PLTA 37.0 2019 Kalimantan Barat Nanga Pinoh PLTA 98.0 2022 Pade Kembayung PLTA 30.0 2022 Kalimantan Selatan Kusan PLTA 65.0 2022 Kalimantan Timur Kelai PLTA 55.0 2022 Lampung Semangka (FTP2) PLTA 56.0 2017 Maluku Wai Tina PLTM 8.0 2016/17 Sapalewa PLTM 8.0 2016/17 Nua (Masohi) PLTM 8.0 2017 Isal PLTM 8.0 2018/19 Wai Tala PLTA 54.0 2019/20 Tene PLTM 4.0 2016 Wae Mala PLTM 1.5 2017 Makariki PLTM 4.0 2017 Maluku Utara Maluku Utara Tersebar PLTM 5.0 2017/18 Nusa Tenggara Barat Santong PLTM 0.9 2013 PLTM Tersebar NTB PLTM 17.2 2013/14/15 Brang Beh 1 PLTA 12.0 2018 Brang Beh 2 PLTA 6.0 2019 PLTM Tersebar NTB PLTM 15.0 2016/17 Nusa Tenggara Timur Ndungga PLTM 1.9 2014 PLTM Tersebar NTT PLTM 3.4 2014/15 Wae Rancang I PLTA 10.0 2017 Wae Rancang II PLTA 6.5 2018 PLTM Tersebar NTT PLTM 9.2 2014/15/16 Papua Walesi 6,7 PLTM 0.6 2013 Orya/Genyem PLTA 20.0 2014 Sinagma 4,5 PLTM 0.4 2014 Baliem PLTA 50.0 2016/17/18 Biak PLTM 2.6 2017 Kalibumi II PLTM 5.0 2017/18 Orya 2 PLTA 10.0 2017 Kalibumi III Cascade PLTM 7.5 2018/19/20 Mariarotu I PLTM 1.3 2017 Walesi Blok II PLTM 6.0 2018 Mariarotu II PLTM 1.3 2018 Amai PLTM 1.4 2018 Papua Barat Prafi PLTM 2.5 2014 Kombemur PLTM 6.6 2014/15 v ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex VI Province Project Type Capacity (MW) Year of Operation Papua Barat Prafi 2 PLTM 1.0 2016 Warsamson PLTA 46.5 2018/19 Waigo PLTM 1.0 2015 Ransiki PLTM 6.0 2016 Sulawesi Barat Karama Baseload (Unsolicited) PLTA 100.0 2020 Karama Peaking (Unsolicited) PLTA 350.0 2021 Poko PLTA 234.0 2020/21 Sulawesi Selatan PLTM Tersebar Sulsel PLTM 94.0 2014/15/16/17 Bonto Batu (FTP 2) PLTA 110.0 2019 Malea (FTP 2) PLTA 90.0 2020 Bakaru 2 PLTA 126.0 2020 Sulawesi Tengah Buleleng (APBN) PLTM 1.2 2016 Sakita PLTM 2.0 2014 PLTM Tersebar Sulteng PLTM 35.2 2014/15/16/17 Wawopada PLTM 6.5 2014/15 Lambangan PLTM 3.0 2014/15 Poro Kabalo PLTM 2.5 2017 Tomasa PLTM 10.0 2017/18 Yaentu PLTM 10.0 2017/18 Sawidago 3 PLTM 1.6 2016 Poso 2 PLTA 132.0 2021/22 Sulawesi Tenggara Rongi PLTM 0.8 2014 Lapai 1 (APBN) PLTM 4.0 2015 Lapai 2 (APBN) PLTM 4.0 2016 Konawe PLTA 50.0 2021 Watunohu PLTA 15.0 2021 Riorita PLTM 0.5 2015 Toaha PLTM 0.5 2015 Sulawesi Utara Duminanga PLTM 3.5 2017 Sawangan PLTA 12.0 2019 Poigar 2 PLTA 30.0 2019 Sumatera Barat Masang-2 (FTP2) PLTA 55.0 2020 Guntung PLM/MH 4.0 2015 Lubuk Sao II PLM/MH 2.6 2015 Bayang PLM/MH 4.5 2015 Tarusan PLM/MH 3.2 2015 Lintau 1 PLM/MH 9.0 2015 Gumanti-3 PLM/MH 6.5 2015 Induring PLM/MH 1.2 2015 Batang Sumpur PLM/MH 8.0 2016 Bukit Cubadak PLM/MH 9.2 2016 Patimah PLM/MH 2.8 2016 Sianok Duku PLM/MH 6.6 2016 laruang Gosan PLM/MH 4.0 2016 Siamang Bunyi PLM/MH 1.7 2016 Pinti Kayu PLM/MH 10.0 2016 Batang Anai PLM/MH 3.2 2016 Batang Sangir PLM/MH 10.0 2017 Hydro power PLM/MH 10.0 2017 Sangir 1 PLM/MH 10.0 2017 Sungai Garam Hydro PLM/MH 10.0 2017 Gunung Tujuh PLM/MH 8.0 2017 Tuik PLM/MH 6.4 2016 Muara Sako PLM/MH 3.0 2016 vi ID.2014.R001.0 SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANING - INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – Annex VI Province Project Type Capacity (MW) Year of Operation Sumatera Barat Kerambil PLM/MH 1.4 2016 Gumanti 1 PLM/MH 4.0 2016 Batang Samo PLM/MH 7.0 2016 Alahan Panjang PLM/MH 3.0 2016 Kambahan PLM/MH 3.0 2016 Rabi Jonggor PLM/MH 9.5 2016 Sungai Aur PLM/MH 2.3 2016 Sikarbau PLM/MH 2.4 2016 Sumatera Utara PLTM Tersebar Sumut PLTM 96.0 2014-2016 Wampu (FTP2) PLTA 45.0 2015 Asahan III (FTP2) PLTA 174.0 2018 Hasang (FTP2) PLTA 40.0 2018 Simonggo-2 PLTA 90.0 2021 Kumbih-3 PLTA 42.0 2021 Sibundong-4 PLTA 32.0 2021 Batang Toru (Tapsel) PLTA 510.0 2022 vii ID.2014.R001.0 GESTO ENERGIA S.A. Av. Cáceres Monteiro, nº 10, 1º Sul 1495-131 Algés, Portugal T. +351 211 579 899 F. +351 211 540 900 www.gestoenergy.com SMALL HYDROPOWER MAPPING AND IMPROVED GEOSPATIAL ELECTRIFICATION PLANNING INDONESIA INCEPTION REPORT – ANNEX VI PROPOSED MoU July 2014 Copyright © 2014, Gesto Energia S.A. NOTA MEMORANDUM OF KESEPAHAMAN UNDERSTANDING antara between PT PLN (PERSERO) PT PLN (PERSERO) dan and GESTO ENERGY CONSULTING GESTO – ENERGIA, S.A. on tentang DATA PROVISION UNDER THE PENGGUNAAN PETA DIGITAL SCOPE OF SMALL HYDROPOWER WILAYAH NUSA TENGGARA MAPPING IN INDONESIA (ESMAP TIMUR (NTT) DAN WILAYAH PROJECT) GDGD MALUKU & MALUKU UTARA HDH (MMU) UNTUK PENYUSUNAN STUDI PERENCANAAN GEOSPASIAL KELISTRIKAN UNTUK PROYEK SMALL MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING HYDROPOWER PLANT IN INDONESIA This Memorandum of Understanding (hereafter referred to as “MoU”) is made on Wednesday, April 16th, 2014 by and between the following: 1. PT PLN (Persero), a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Indonesia, registered address in Jalan 1-10 Trunojoyo Blok M I/135 Kebayoran Baru, NOTA KESEPAHAMAN Jakarta 12160, Indonesia, is represented by Mr. I Made Ro Sakya, Head of System Planning Division of PT PLN (Persero) based on Board of Nota Kesepahaman ini (selanjutnya disebut Director Decree of PT PLN (Persero) No. “Nota Kesepahaman”) dibuat pada hari Senin, 0958.K/426/DIR/2013 dated June 05th, 2013 tanggal 28 Oktober 2013 antara: and therefore legitimate and authorized to act for and on behalf of the PT PLN (Persero), 1. PT PLN (Persero), sebuah perusahaan hereinafter referred as “First Party”; terbatas yang dibentuk berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan Republik Indonesia dengan alamat terdaftar di Jalan Trunojoyo Blok MI/135 Kebayoran Baru 2. Gesto – Energia, S.A., a public limited liability Jakarta 12160, Indonesia, diwakili oleh company incorporated under the laws of Bapak I Made Ro Sakya, Kepala Divisi Portugal, r with head office in Zona Industrial Perencanaan Sistim PT PLN (Persero) de Oliveira de Frades, 3680-170 Oliveira de berdasarkan Keputusan Direksi PT PLN Frades, Viseu with office in Av. Caceres (Persero) No.0958.K/426/DIR/2013 Monteiro, N0.10, 10, Sul 1495 – 192 Alges, tanggal 05 Juni 2013, bertindak secara sah Portugal is represented by its Directors Mr.. untuk dan atas nama PT PLN (Persero), Miguel Barreto Caldeira Antunes,and Mr. seterusnya disebut sebagai “Pihak Pedro Miguel Borges Fernandes, duly Pertama”; authorized for this purpose according to Permanent Certificate with online access code 2. Gesto Energy Consulting, sebuah 6342-2714-0387 and therefore legitimate and perusahaan konsultan yang dibentuk authorized to act for and on behalf of the berdasarkan peraturan perundang- Gesto – Energia, S.A.(hereinafter referred to as undangan New Zealand, dengan alamat “Second Party”). terdaftar di Av. Caceres Monteiro, N0.10, 10, Sul 1495 – 192 Alges, Portugal, diwakili oleh Bapak Jorge André selaku Direktur Gesto Energy Consulting berdasarkan akta Hereinafter referred to individually as “Party” and pendirian perusahaan No. 1237692 “collectively as “Parties”. tanggal 6 September 2002 bertindak secara sah untuk dan atas nama Castalia Strategic Advisor, seterusnya disebut sebagai “Pihak Kedua”; WHEREAS: Selanjutnya Pihak Pertama dan Pihak Kedua secara masing-masing disebut “Pihak” dan 1. PT PLN (Persero) is a State Owned Electricity secara bersama-sama disebut “Para Pihak”. Company, having its core business in providing electrical power for all Regions in Indonesia. Terlebih dahulu menerangkan hal-hal sebagai 2. Gesto – Energia, S.A. is a Private Company, berikut: having its core business in providing consulting services and having a separate 1. PT PLN (Persero) adalah sebuah Badan agreement with the World Bank for Usaha Milik Negara, memiliki bisnis utama preparation of Small Hydropower Mapping dalam penyediaan tenaga listrik untuk in Indonesia. semua daerah di Indonesia. 2. Gesto Energy Consulting adalah sebuah 3. In order to carry out the assignment for 2-10 perusahaan swasta, yang memiliki bisnis preparing the Small Hydropower Mapping, utama menyediakan jasa konsultasi Second Party intends to use data and engineering dan telah terikat kontrak information owned or accessible by First secara terpisah dengan Bank Dunia untuk 4. The Parties intend to establish an membantu dalam penyusunan studi understanding within the framework of the perencanaan geospasial terkait proyek implementation and utilization of the data Renewable Energy for Small Hydropower provided by the First party to preparation Plant in Indonesia. ofthe Small Hydropower Mapping Project. 3. Dalam rangka melaksanakan tugas penyusunan studi perencanaan geospasial Now, therefore the Parties hereby agrees as kelistrikan untuk proyek REEP tersebut, follows: Pihak Kedua membutuhkan peta digital yang dimiliki oleh Pihak Pertama. 4. Para Pihak bermaksud untuk mengadakan ARTICLE 1 kesepahaman dalam rangka pelaksanaan Scope of MoU dan penggunaan peta digital di wilayah Nusa Tenggara Timur (NTT) dan wilayah The scope of work under this Technical Assistance Maluku & Maluku Utara (MMU) untuk (TA) comprises of the specific tasks detailed in this penyusunan studi perencanaan geospasial section. Geographically, this assignment is kelistrikan terkait dengan proyek REEP. expected to be initially national wide and o n a second stage piloted in three provinces in the Eastern Indonesia region: (i) province of Nusa Berdasarkan hal-hal tersebut di atas, PARA Tenggara Timur (NTT), served by the PLN Wilayah PIHAK menyepakati sebagai berikut: (branch) office based in Kupang; (ii) the provinces of Maluku and Maluku Utara, served by the PLN Wilayah office in Ambon, (iii) the province of PASAL 1 Sulawesi, served by the PLN Wilayah office in Ruang Lingkup Nota Kesepahaman Gorontalo(?). The scope of this MoU includes the tasks in Annex 1 – Terms of Reference. Ruang lingkup pekerjaan dalam bantuan teknis (TA) ini terdiri dari tugas-tugas khusus yang akan dibahas dalam bagian ini. Secara geografis, tugas ini diharapkan dapat awalnya diujicobakan di dua provinsi di wilayah ARTICLE 2 Indonesia Timur: (i) Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Implementation of MoU Timur (NTT), dilayani oleh Wilayah (cabang) kantor PLN yang berbasis di Kupang; dan (ii) 1. First Party’s provinsi Maluku dan Maluku Utara, dilayani 1.1. Allowing the use of yard land owned by oleh kantor Wilayah PLN di Ambon, Maluku. First Party (if available) or available work Adapun ruang lingkup pekerjaan tersebut room in PLN Region (“First Party Unit”) in meliputi: East Nusa Tenggara (NTT), Maluku & North Maluku (MMU) and Sulawesi for a. Tugas-1: Pengambilan data langsung Small Hydropower Mapping dilapangan, pengolahan data, persiapan implementation. dan pemanfaatan teknologi informasi geospasial untuk mendukung persiapan 1.2. To assist Second Party to do coordinate dan pelaksanaan dalam mendapatkan mapping and coordinate with all related analisis referensi geospasial terhadap parties, including local governments, sistim jaringan isolated (MV / LV) dengan related to the permits and licenses. biaya termurah terkait dengan rencana 3-10 investasi (2013-2025), dan biaya 1.3. First Party has right to own and use the pembangkit energi terbarukan yang efektif Small Hydropower Mapping done by untuk perpindahan diesel dan perluasan Second Party. pembangkit untuk setiap sistem jaringan diesel yang masih isolated. Pekerjaan ini 1.4. To make available to the Second Party dapat didefinisikan lagi menjadi: the necessary data and information in i. Penyusunan sturktur database GIS – their possession considered relevant for Layer the completion of the assignment. ii. Penyusunan rencana investasi sistim jaringan baru dengan biaya termurah 2. Second Party’s iii. Rencana perluasan pembangkit hibrida 2.1. Prepare the details of the Small untuk pembangkit diesel dengan biaya Hydropower Mapping in accordance with termurah the planned schedule (Annex 1 – Terms of Reference). b. Tugas-2: Merancang Sistim Komunal 2.2. To provide training for First Party’s i. Identifikasi geospasial dan regarding the operational and geospatial Menentukan karakter beban information to personnel due to enhance berdasarkan populasi kluster sesuai and improve First Party’s personnel dengan komposisi ukuran capacity and knowledge. ii. Standard pelayanan untuk desain 2.3. In of the event, the result of Small hibrida pada sistem komunal Hydropower Mapping is not accordance iii. Evaluasi sistem hibrida pada jaringan to the agreed by the Parties and/or term alternatif microgrid sesuai tugas yang of this MoU has expired, the Second telah diidentifikasi pada tugas-2: b.i Party shall submit all results of studies that have been made to the first party. c. Tugas-3: Rencana Sektor pembiayaan dan Analisis perhitungan selisih pembiayaan proyek (2013-2018) d. Tugas-4: Peningkatan kemampuan sumber ARTICLE 3 daya manusia dalam pemanfaatan Cost and Taxation teknologi informasi geospasial kepada Pihak Pertama. All costs (installation, operation and maintenance) including costs in obtaining all permits required and tax incurred due to the said Small Hydropower PASAL 2 Mapping study will be covered and borne by Pelaksanaan Nota Kesepahaman Second Party. 1. Pihak Pertama 1.1. Memperbolehkan penggunaan lahan ARTICLE 4 milik Pihak Pertama (apabila Correspondence and Communication memungkinkan) di halaman kantor / ruangan kantor yang tersedia pada Any notice, request or communication under this PLN Unit setempat (“Unit Pihak MoU shall be in Indonesia and English language Pertama”) di Wilayah Nusa Tenggara and given to address specified below. Timur dan Wilayah Maluku dan Maluku Utara, untuk pelaksanaan First Party: studi perencanaan geospasial kelistrikan. 1. I MADE RO SAKYA 1.2. Mendampingi PIHAK KEDUA Head of System Planning Division melakukan pemetaan koordinat dan 4-10 koordinasi dengan sejumlah pihak 2. SYOFVI F. ROEKMAN terkait termasuk pemerintah daerah Head of Corporate Strategic Planning Division setempat berkaitan dengan izin-izin. 3. MOCH. SOFYAN 1.3. Pihak Pertama berhak untuk memiliki Head of New & Renewable Energy DIvision dan menggunakan hasil studi perencanaan geospasial kelistrikan yang dibuat oleh Pihak Kedua. Office Address: PT PLN (Persero) Headquarter Jl. Trunojoyo, Blok M I/135 2. Pihak Kedua Jakarta 12160 2.1. Menyiapkan rincian program studi Phone : (021) 725 1234 ext. 1155; ext. 1244 kelayakan sesuai dengan jadwal yang Fax : (021) 739 7359 direncanakan. Alamat Email : 2.2. Memberikan pelatihan terkait I Made Ro Sakya: imadero@pln.co.id pelaksanaan dan informasi geospasial Syofvi F. Roekman: syofvi.roekman@pln.co.id kepada pegawai Pihak Pertama untuk Moch. Sofyan : m.sofyan@pln.co.id peningkatan kapasitas dan pengetahuan pegawai Pihak Pertama; 2.3. Dalam hal hasil Studi perencanaan Second Party: geospasial kelistrikan tidak sesuai dengan yang telah disepakati oleh Jorge André Para Pihak dan/atau pada saat Vice-President Gesto – Energia, S.A. Av. Caceres 0 0 kesepakatan ini berakhir, maka Pihak Monteiro, N .10, 1 , Sul 1495–192 Alges, Portugal Kedua akan menyerahkan semua Telp : +351 211 579 899 hasil studi yang telah dibuat kepada Faks : +351 211 540 900 pihak pertama. Email Address: jorge.andre@gestoenergy.com PASAL 3 Biaya dan Pajak ARTICLE 5 Semua biaya termasuk biaya yang diperlukan Confidentiality untuk mengurus ijin-ijin yang diperlukan, pajak-pajak yang timbul sehubungan dengan 1. Each Party acknowledges that certain studi kelayaakan menjadi tanggung jawab information is classified confidential which Pihak Kedua. is any information received from the disclosing party pertaining to the Disclosing Party or any Affiliate thereof, PASAL 4 since the date the Parties execute this Surat Menyurat dan Komunikasi Agreement and with retroactive effect from _____April 15th 2014__., of Setiap laporan, permintaan atau komunikasi whatsoever nature (including technical, sehubungan dengan Nota Kesepahaman ini financial, commercial, legal or intellectual akan diajukan dalam Bahasa Indonesia dan property) and in whatsoever form Bahasa Inggris dan ditujukan pada alamat (including oral, electronic or digitized) and sebagai berikut: howsoever stored (including in hard copy or electronically), which is disclosed in any form, including any documentation, 5-10 spreadsheets, correspondence, Pihak Pertama: memoranda, notes, analyses or financial data (“Confidential Information”) 1. I MADE RO SAKYA Kepala Divisi Perencanaan Sistim 2. SYOFVI F. ROEKMAN Kepala Divisi Perencanaan Strategis 2. Each Party shall keep strict confidential and Korporat will not use for any other purpose than developing the Small Hydropower Mapping 3. Moch. Sofyan Study, or reveal to any other person, firm or Kepala Divisi Energi Baru dan Terbarukan other company any Confidential Information unless it obtains a prior written consent of the Party which had originally disclosed or Alamat Kawat Surat: contributed such information. The foregoing PT PLN (Persero) KANTOR PUSAT shall however not apply to: Jl. Trunojoyo, Blok M I/135 Jakarta 12160 Telp : (021) 725 1234 ext. 1155; ext. 1244 a. Disclose to such directors, officers or Faks : (021) 739 7359 employees of the Party who, for the purpose of this MoU, are directly involved Alamat Email : with the assessment of the Confidential I Made Ro Sakya: imadero@pln.co.id Information. Syofvi F. Roekman: syofvi.roekman@pln.co.id b. Information which shall come into public Moch. Sofyan : m.sofyan@pln.co.id domain. c. Information which is required or allowed to be disclosed under any law, Pihak Kedua: government order, decree and regulation. d. In relation of the implementation that Jorge André second Party assisted by Subcontractors, Director Gesto Energy Consulting the Second Party shall ensure that Av. Caceres Monteiro, N0.10, 10, Sul 1495–192 subcontractors do not provide data to Alges, Portugal other parties without the consent of the Telp : +351 211 579 899 First Party in accordance with the content Faks : +351 211 540 900 of the provisions in Article 5 in this Agreement. Alamat Email : (silahkan menulis email anda) ARTICLE 6 Amendment This MoU may only be amended or modified in written, agreed and signed by the Parties. ARTICLE 7 Term of MoU 6-10 1. The MoU will be valid up to two (2) years PASAL 5 commencing from the date of signing and will Kerahasiaan be automatically terminate, unless extended by written consent mutually agreed by the 1. Masing-masing Pihak sepakat bahwa Parties. informasi tertentu diklasifikasikan sebagai rahasia, yaitu setiap informasi yang 2. In case of termination MoU, neither Party diterima dari pemberi informasi terkait shall have any further duty/obligation to pemberi informasi atau afiliasinya, sejak other Party other than pursuant to Article 5. tanggal Nota Kesepahaman ini ditandatangani, apapun jenisnya (termasuk teknis, finansial, komersial, legal atau 3. This MoU shall be considered as non-binding kekayaan intelektual) dan dalam bentuk and non-exclusive agreement. apapun juga (termasuk lisan, elektronik atau digital) dan bagaimana pun cara penyimpanannya (termasuk dalam bentuk ARTICLE 8 salinan dokumen atau dokumen Law, Disputes, Assignments elektronik), yang diungkapkan oleh pemberi informasi dalam bentuk apapun, termasuk 1. According to Article 1 of this MoU, if any dalam bentuk dokumentasi, spreadsheet, dispute or difference of any kind whatsoever surat menyurat, memorandum, catatan, shall be arise (“Dispute”) between the Parties analisis atau data keuangan (“Informasi in the connection with, or arising out of, this Rahasia”) MOU hereof, the Parties shall attempt, for a 2. Masing-masing Pihak akan secara ketat period of thirty (30) days after the receipt by menjaga kerahasiaan dan tidak akan one Party of a notice from the other Party of digunakan untuk tujuan lain selain the existence of the Dispute to settle such pelaksanaan Studi kelayakan, Pemetaan Dispute in the instance by mutual discussion Geospasial, atau diberikan kepada pihak between the Parties. lain, lembaga atau perusahaan lain segala Informasi Rahasia kecuali dengan persetujuan tertulis dari pihak yang 2. If the Dispute cannot be settled by mutual sebelumnya telah mengungkapkan atau discussion within the 30 days period provided memberikan informasi tersebut. Ketentuan in paragraph 1 this article by the Parties, the ini tidak berlaku terhadap: Dispute will be finally settled by Indonesia a. Pemberitahuan kepada direktur, National Board of Arbitration in Jakarta petugas atau karyawan dari PIHAK yang National. secara langsung terlibat dengan Informasi Rahasia tersebut berdasarkan 3. The MoU shall be governed by and construed Nota Kesepahaman ini. in accordance with the laws of the Republic of b. Informasi yang merupakan informasi Indonesia. publik. c. Informasi yang tersedia pada PIHAK 4. Neither Party shall assign or transfer the yang pada dasarnya dikategorikan non- benefits or obligations of this MoU to any rahasia sebelum Nota Kesepahaman ini third party or parties without the prior berlaku. written consent of the other Party during the d. Informasi yang diperbolehkan atau term of this MoU. diizinkan untuk diungkapkan berdasarkan peraturan perundang- undangan, Peraturan Pemerintah, Surat ARTICLE 9 7-10 Keputusan, Undang-Undang, atau Miscellaneous peraturan yang berlaku. 1. This MoU construes the entire agreement e. Sehubungan dalam pelaksanaanya between the Parties with respect to the Pihak Kedua dibantu oleh Sub subject to matter. There are no warranties, kontraktor, maka Pihak Kedua harus term, conditions, undertakings or collateral menjamin subkontraktor tersebut tidak agreements, expressed, implied or statutory, memberikan data kepada pihak lain among the Parties other than those expressly tanpa persetujuan Pihak Pertama set forth herein. sesuai dengan isi ketentuan dalam Pasal 5 Perjanjian ini. 2. This MoU including all modifications and amendments to this MoU will be made within 2 (two) languages, Indonesian and English PASAL 6 languages. In case there is any difference or Amandemen discrepancy between the 2 (two) languages, the Indonesian version will be prevail and Nota Kesepahamanan ini hanya dapat used as reference. diamandemen atau dirubah sepanjang disepakati dan ditandatangani oleh PARA For and behalf of: PIHAK dalam bentuk tertulis. First Party PT PLN (Persero) PASAL 7 Jangka Waktu Nota Kesepahaman 1. Nota Kesepahaman ini berlaku untuk jangka waktu 1 (satu) tahun terhitung sejak ditandatangani dan akan berakhir secara otomatis, kecuali diperpanjang secara tertulis berdasarkan persetujuan PARA PIHAK. 2. Dalam hal berakhirnya Nota Kesepahamanan, tidak ada I MADE RO SAKYA tugas/kewajiban/klaim lebih lanjut antara HEAD OF SYSTEM PLANNING DIVISION satu PIHAK dan PIHAK lainnya kecuali kewajiban sebagaimana ditentukan pada Pasal 5. 3. Nota Kesepahaman ini adalah tidak Second Party mengikat dan tidak bersifat eksklusif. GESTO – ENERGIA, S.A. PASAL 8 MIGUEL BARRETO Hukum, Perselisihan, Pengalihan CEO 1. Mengacu pada ketentuan dalam Pasal 1 dari Nota Kesepahaman ini, jika ada PEDRO BORGES FERNANDES sengketa atau perbedaan apapun yang COO terjadi antara Para Pihak atau timbul karena Nota Kesepahaman ini, Para Pihak 8-10 wajib berusaha, dalam jangka waktu 30 (tiga puluh) hari setelah diterimanya pemberitahuan dari salah satu Pihak kepada Pihak lainnya untuk menyelesaikan sengketa tersebut melalui suatu cara musyawarah dan mufakat antara Para Pihak. 2. Jika Perselisihan tidak dapat diselesaikan secara musyawarah dan mufakat dalam jangka waktu 30 (tiga puluh) hari sesuai ayat 1 Pasal ini, maka Perselisihan akan diselesaikan secara final melalui Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia (BANI) di Jakarta. 3. Nota Kesepahaman ini akan diberlakukan dan ditafsirkan sesuai dengan hukum Republik Indonesia. 4. Tidak satupun Pihak dapat memberikan atau mengalihkan Nota Kesepahaman ini kepada pihak ketiga tanpa persetujuan tertulis dari Pihak lainnya. PASAL 9 Lain-lain 1. Nota Kesepahaman ini merupakan seluruh perjanjian antara PARA Pihak sehubungan dengan ruang lingkup Nota Kesepahaman ini. Tidak ada jaminan, syarat-syarat, kondisi, usaha atau perjanjian jaminan, pernyataan, secara eksplisit maupun implisit, diantara Para Pihak selain yang secara tegas tercantum dalam Nota Kesepahaman ini. 2. Nota Kesepahaman ini termasuk semua modifikasi dan perubahan akan dibuat dalam 2 (dua) bahasa, bahasa Inggris dan bahasa Indonesia. Dalam hal terdapat perbedaan persepsi atau pemahaman antara kedua bahasa, maka versi bahasa Indonesia yang akan berlaku dan digunakan sebagai acuan. 9-10 Untuk dan atas nama: Pihak Pertama PT PLN (Persero) I MADE RO SAKYA KEPALA DIVISI PERENCANAAN SISTIM Pihak Kedua GESTO ENERGY CONSULTING MIGUEL BARRETO CEO 10-10 GESTO ENERGIA S.A. Av. Cáceres Monteiro, nº 10, 1º Sul 1495-131 Algés, Portugal T. +351 211 579 899 F. +351 211 540 900 www.gestoenergy.com