E4084 SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFEGUARDS FRAMEWORK FOR THE PHILIPPINE RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ! ! ! ! ! ! ! November!28,!2012! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1! ! Table&of&Contents& 1# 4# Introduction#.................................................................................................................................................# 4# 1.1#The#Program#...............................................................................................................................................# 4# 1.2#Social#and#Environmental#Safeguards#........................................................................................................# 2# 5# Environmental#Framework#and#Guidelines#for#PRDP#...................................................................................# 5# 2.1#Environmental#Impact#of#Subprojects#........................................................................................................# 5# 2.2#Environmental#Safeguards#Systems#...........................................................................................................# 2.#3#Environmental#Monitoring#.....................................................................................................................#13# 2.4#Institutional#Arrangements#for#Safeguards#.............................................................................................#13# 2.5#Assessment#of#PRDP#Year#1#Subprojects#.................................................................................................#17# 3# Indigenous#Peoples#Development#Framework#.........................................................................................#17# 3.1#Rationale#.................................................................................................................................................#17# 3.2#IP#Framework#Objective#..........................................................................................................................#17# 3.3#Indigenous#Peoples#Defined#....................................................................................................................#18# 3.4#Indigenous#Peoples#in#the#Philippines##....................................................................................................#20# 3.5#Social#Assessment##..................................................................................................................................#21# 3.6#IP#Development#and#PRDP#......................................................................................................................#22# 3.7#Requirements#for#Subprojects#................................................................................................................#22# 3.8#Damage#to#Cultural#Properties#or#Resources#..........................................................................................#25# 3.9#Land#Acquisition#......................................................................................................................................#25# 3.10#Institutional#Arrangements#...................................................................................................................#25# 3.11#Institutional#Capacity#............................................................................................................................#27# 3.12#Supervision,#Monitoring#and#Evaluation#...............................................................................................#27# 3.13#Costs#and#Financing#...............................................................................................................................#27# 4# Land#Acquisition#Rehabilitation#and#Resettlement#Framework#...............................................................#28# 4.1#Rationale#.................................................................................................................................................#28# 4.2#Principles#and#Objectives#........................................................................................................................#28# 4.3#Social#Assessments#and#Social#Management#Plan#..................................................................................#29# 4.4#Entitlement#Policy#...................................................................................................................................#29# 4.5#People's#Participation#and#Consultation#.................................................................................................#31# ..................................................................................................................................................#31# 4.6#Donation# 4.7#Resettlement#Plan#...................................................................................................................................#31# ...............................................................................................................#31# 4.7.1#Inventory#and#Entitlement# 4.7.2#Full#Resettlement#Plan#and#Survey#..................................................................................................#32# 4.8#Institutional#Arrangements#for#Safeguards#.............................................................................................#32# ! 2! ! List&of&Tables& No.& Title& Page&No.& 1# Environmentally#Critical#Projects# 7# 2# Environmentally#Critical#Areas# 8# 3# Size#and#Scale#Thresholds#for#NonXEnvironmentally#Critical# 9# Projects#in#Environmentally#Critically#Areas#(ECAs)& 4# Environmental#and#social#safeguards#activities#and#responsible# 14# units& & & List&of&Annexes& No.& Title& Page&No.& A& Types#of#Subprojects#Likely#to#be#Funded## & B& Technical#Guidelines#and#Specifications#for#each#type#of# & Subproject# C& Guidance#for#the#preparation#of#the#Environmental#and#Social# & Assessment#Portions#in#the#Subproject#Feasibility#Study# Reports#and#the#Environmental#and#Social# Management/Mitigation#Plan# D& Guidance#for#Reviewing#the#Safeguards#Aspect#of#PRDP# & Subprojects## E& ESMP#template# & F& Compliance#Monitoring#Form# & G& Entitlement#Survey#Form# & ! & & & ! ! ! ! & ! & 3! ! 1& Introduction& ! 1.1&The&Program& # The# Philippine# Rural# Development# Program# (PRDP)# is# a# sixXyear# national# government# development# platform# aimed# at# contributing# towards# achieving# an# inclusive,# valueXchain# oriented,# and# climate# resilient# agriculture# and# fisheries# sector.# Specifically,# PRDP# aims# to# provide#an#operational#Agriculture#and#Fisheries#Modernization#Plan#(AFMP)#for#an#integrated& technical# support# service# delivery& at# the# local# and# national# levels,# build# strategic# network# of# rural#logistics#infrastructure#within#priority#value#chains& in#targeted#program#areas,#strengthen# and#develop#viable#rural#enterprises& through#efficient#supply/value#chain#of#key#agricultural#and# fishery# products# in# targeted# program# areas,# implement# and# model# innovations# towards# more# effective# and# efficient# institutional# support# systems# for# program# implementation,# and# institutionalize#stakeholder#engagement.# # The#thrust#of#PRDP#to#develop#a#marketXoriented#and#climateXresilient#agriculture#and#fishery# sector#will#be#articulated#through#its#four#(4)#components:#i)#Investments#for#AFMP#Planning#at# Local#and#National#Levels#(IXPLAN),#ii)#Intensified#BuildingXUp#of#Infrastructure#and#Logistics#for# Development# (IXBUILD),# iii)# Investments# for# Rural# Enterprises# and# AgriXfishery# Productivity# (IX REAP)# and,# iv)# Support# to# Program# Implementation# (IXSUPPORT).# Subprojects# implemented# under#components#ii#(IXBUILD)#and#iii#(IXREAP)#undergo#various#screenings#and#reviews#such#that# project# implementation# accord# to# the# governing# principles# and# guidelines# for# development# projects.# 1.2&Social&and&Environmental&Safeguards& # The#social#and#environmental#safeguards#(SES)#is#one#of#the#support#activities#of#the#Mindanao# Rural# Development# ProgramXAPL2# (MRDP2)# that# will# be# adopted# in# PRDP# to# ensure# that# subprojects#to#be#implemented#are#not#only#technically,#economically#and#financially#viable,#but# are#also#environmentally#and#socially#sound#and#sustainable.## # The#SES#operates#according#to#the#provisions#of#the#Philippine#Environmental#Impact#Statement# Law# (Presidential# Decree# 1586),# the# Philippine# Indigenous# Peoples# Rights# Act# (Republic# Act# 8371),#the#Right#of#Way#Acquisition#Law#(Republic#Act#8974)#and#their#implementing#rules#and# regulations# and# the# operational# policies# of# the# World# Bank# on# Environmental# Assessment# (Operational# Policy/Bank# Policy# 4.01),# Natural# Habitats# (Operational# Policy/Bank# Policy# 4.04),# Pest# Management# (Operational# Policy# 4.09),# Indigenous# Peoples# (Operational# Policy/Bank# Policy#4.10)#and#Involuntary#Resettlement#(Operational#Policy/Bank#Policy#4.12).## # Aimed# at# ensuring# that# the# people# and# the# environment# are# not# adversely# affected# by# the# projects,# the# SES# requirements# encompass# all# project# components.# All# proposed# subprojects,# particularly# under# IXBUILD# and# IXREAP# components,# shall# undergo# environmental# screening# conforming# to# the# environmental# guidelines.# Project# implementation# will# also# determine# if# construction#activities#cause#to#displace#and#affect#persons#such#that#appropriate#resettlement,# compensation# and# rehabilitation# plans# in# accordance# to# land# acquisition,# resettlement# and# 4! ! rehabilitation#framework#are#being#formulated#for#the#project#affected#persons.#Moreover,#the# SES# involves# project# affected# rural# communities,# particularly# involving# the# indigenous# peoples# and#communities,#in#the#planning#and#design#of#subprojects#that#accord#with#the#provisions#in# the#IP#policy#framework.#! 2& Environmental&Management&Framework&and&Guidelines&for&PRDP&# 2.1&Environmental&Impact&of&Subprojects& ! Of#the#four#PRDP#components,#IXBUILD#and#IXREAP#are#the#ones#with#onXtheXground#subprojects# most# likely# to# bring# about# environmental# impact.# The# menu# of# eligible# infrastructure# interventions# for# IXBUILD# will# be# the# same# as# that# of# MRDP2,# but# with# a# wider# geographical# reach# and# augmented# with# fisheriesXrelated# support# infrastructure# and# facilities# such# as# fish# landings.# IXREAP,# on# the# other# hand,# will# fund# similar# interventions# provided# under# the# CFAD## and# NRM# components# of# MRDP2.# These# would# include# under# the# IXREAP# component,# community#livelihood#subprojects#involving#crop#and#animal#production#and#establishment#and# operation# of# common# service# facilities# in# production,# postharvest# and# marketing;# and# natural# resource# management# interventions# such# as# mangrove# rehabilitation,# marine# sanctuary# establishment,# artificial# reef# establishment,# stream# bank# stabilization# measures,# upland# reforestation,#and#aquaXsilviculture.##Most#activities/subXprojects#are#smallXscale#with#localized,# manageable# and# temporary# environmental# impacts# and# are# not# covered# by# the# existing# Philippine#Environmental#Impact#Statement#System#(PEISS)1.#However#some#while#they#are#nonX# environmentallyXcritical# may# be# located# in# critical# areas2#and# hence# may# be# covered# by# the# PEISS.## This# Environmental# Management# Framework# and# Guidelines# (EMFG)# will# guide# the# screening,# preparation,#review#and#approval#of#IXBUILD#and#IXREAP#subprojects.### 2.2&Environmental&Safeguards&Systems& ! The#EMFG#will#provide#four#layers#of#environmental#safeguards#to#the#Project.#These#are:##(i)#the# adoption#of#general#policies#pertaining#to#the#types#and#location#of#developments#that#can#be# pursued#by#the#LGUs;#(ii)#the#conformance#of#individual#subprojects#to#technical#guidelines#and# specifications;# (iii)# the# screening# and# review# under# the# Philippine# EIS# system;# (iv)# the# environmental# and# social# assessments# (EA/SA)# resulting# in# the# environmental# and# social# management/mitigation#plan#(ESMP)#which#are#undertaken#as#part#of#the#subproject#feasibility# studies.# !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1!Under#DENR#Administrative#Order#2003X30,#these#are#“Category#Dâ€?#Projects#or#Projects#unlikely#to#cause#adverse# environmental#impacts#(Sec.#4.5,#DAO#2003X30).#Projects#classified#under#Category#D#may#secure#a#Certificate#of# NonXCoverage#(CNC).#The#Environmental#Management#Bureau#(EMBXDENR),#however,#may#require#such#projects# or#undertakings#to#provide#additional#environmental#safeguards#as#it#may#deem#necessary#(Sec.#4.6,#DAO#2003X30).# 2 #Under#DENR#Administrative#Order#2003X30,#these#are#“Category#Bâ€?#Projects,#or#Projects#that#are#not#categorized# as#Environmentally#Critical#Projects#(ECPs),#but#which#may#cause#negative#environmental#impacts#because#they#are# located#in#Environmentally#Critical#Areas#(ECAs)#(Sec.#4.5,#DAO#2003X30).# 5! ! (i)&Adoption&of&Local&Environmental&Policies! ! The# Project# will# adopt# a# set# of# general# policies# pertaining# to# the# types# and# location# of# infrastructure# or# development# in# the# project# areas.# Formulated# under# MRDP2,# these# policies# will# guide# LGUs# on# the# proper# use# of# the# uplands,# lowlands,# and# coastal# areas.# Participating# LGUs#are#encouraged#to#adopt#the#following#land#use#and#protection#policies:# (a) Gently# to# moderately# sloping# grasslands# (5X18%# slope)# may# be# put# to# intensive# agricultural# production# that# requires# seasonal# and# periodic# cultivation# using# sloping#agricultural#land#technologies#(SALT).# # (b) Grassland# areas# with# slope# gradients# of# 18X30%# if# utilized# for# agricultural# production# should# be# utilized# only# for# establishment# of# orchards# and# industrial# tree#plantation.## # (c) Grassland/open# lands# with# slope# gradients# of# 30X50%# or# more# shall# only# be# developed#into#intensive#agroXforestry#farm#or#utilized#as#community#forest.## # (d) All#stream#banks#starting#from#100#masl#up#to#the#highest#tributary#shall#maintain# a# 50Xmeter# and# 20Xmeter# vegetative# riparian# buffer# for# riverbanks# and# creek/streambank#protection,#respectively.## # (e) Areas# utilized# for# aquaculture/fishpond# shall# maintain# a# 50Xmeter# mangrove# buffer#between#the#fishpond#and#open#sea#for#coastal#protection.## # (f) Existing# mangrove# forests# shall# no# longer# be# subjected# to# alternative# land# use# conversion#but#shall#be#maintained#in#support#of#fishery#production#and#coastal# protection#programs.## # (g) Establishment#of#pasture#areas#shall#include#planting#of#shade#trees#on#20Xmeter# wide#strips#on#both#sides#of#creeks/rivers.# # (h) Mudflats# on# coastal# areas# covered# under# NRM# subprojects# shall# be# planted# to# mangrove#species.# # (i) Remaining# forests# within# area# of# influence# of# PRDP# subprojects# shall# be# protected# from# agricultural# encroachments,# illegal# logging# and# forest# product# harvesting#and#hunting;#if#forests#are#present#within#the#influence#area#of#FMRs,# the# concerned# LGUs# must# include# a# forest# protection# plan/program# in# conjunction#with#the#subproject#proposal.# &(ii)&Environmental&Screening&and&Review&under&the&Philippine&Environmental&Impact& Statement&System&(PEISS)& # All# subprojects# are# subject# to# environmental# screening# under# PEISS.# Under# the# PEISS,# certain# 6! ! project# types# that# are# considered# Environmentally# Critical# (Table# 1)# and# all# projects# that# are# located# in# Environmentally# Critical# Areas# (Table# 2)# are# required# to# prepare# an# Environmental# Impact# Statement.# The# DENR# Admin# Order# No# 30# Series# of# 2003# has# further# defined# four# categories#of#projects,#based#on#their#type,#scale#and#location.#CategoryXA#are#those#types#that# are# considered# Environmentally# Critical# Projects# (ECPs).# CategoryXB# are# those# that# are# not# considered# environmentally# critical# but# are# nevertheless# located# in# Environmentally# Critical# Areas# (ECAs)# and# are# above# certain# scale# or# size# thresholds.# CategoryXC# are# those# that# are# in# themselves# Environmental# Enhancements# such# as# wastewater# treatment# and# solid# waste# management.#Lastly,#“CategoryXDâ€?#are#those#that#are#neither#environmentally#critical#types#nor# located# in# environmentally# critical# areas# or# those# that# are# below# not# environmentally# critical# but# located# in# environmentally# critical# areas# and# are# below# certain# scale# or# size# thresholds.# CategoryXD# subprojects# are# not# required# to# prepare# Environmental# Impact# Statements# (EIS).# The# latest# Procedural# Manual# for# DENR# DAO# 2003X30# specifies# the# scale# or# size# thresholds# below#which#a#non#ECP#located#in#ECA#would#fall#under#Category#D#(Table#3).## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 7! ! Table&1.&Environmentally&Critical&Projects&(ECPs).& i. Heavy#Industries## # a. NonXferrous#metal#industries# b. #Iron#and#steel#mills## c. Petroleum#and#petroXchemical#industries#including#oil#and#gas## d. Smelting#plants# # ii. Resource#Extractive#Industries## # a. Major#mining#and#quarrying#projects## b. Forestry#projects## 1. Logging# 2. Major#wood#processing#projects## 3. Introduction#of#fauna#(exoticXanimals)#in#public/private#forests## 4. Forest#occupancy## 5. Extraction#of#mangrove#products## 6. Grazing## # c. #Fishery#Projects## # 1. Dikes#for#fishpond#development#projects# # iii. Infrastructure#Projects## # a. Major#dams## b. Major# power# plants# (fossilXfuelled,# nuclear# fuelled,# hydroelectric# or# geothermal)## c. Major#reclamation#projects## d. Major#roads#and#bridges.## # iv. Golf#Course#Projects## # Reference:#Revised#Procedural#Manual#for#DAO#No.#03X30,#citing#Proclamation#No.#2146#(1981)#and#Proclamation#No.#803#(1996) & & # # # # # # 8! ! Table&2.&Environmentally&N&Critical&Areas&(ECAs).& i. All#areas#declared#by#law#as#national#parks,#watershed#reserves,#wildlife#preserves# and#sanctuaries;## # ii. Areas#classified#as#prime#agricultural#lands;## # iii. Areas# frequently# visited# and/or# hardXhit# by# natural# calamities# (geologic# hazards,# floods,#typhoons,#volcanic#activity,#etc.)## # iv. Areas#of#unique#historic,#archaeological,#or#scientific#interests;## # v. Areas#set#aside#as#aesthetic#potential#tourist#spots;## # vi. Areas#which#are#traditionally#occupied#by#cultural#communities#or#tribes;## # vii. Areas# which# constitute# the# habitat# for# any# endangered# or# threatened# species# of# indigenous#Philippine#Wildlife#(flora#and#fauna);## # viii. Areas#with#critical#slopes#(slopes#of#40%#or#greater);## # ix. Recharged#areas#of#aquifers;## # x. Water#bodies#characterized#by#one#or#any#combination#of#the#following#conditions:## # a. tapped#for#domestic#purposes;## b. within# the# controlled# and/or# protected# areas# declared# by# appropriate# authorities;## c. which#support#wildlife#and#fishery#activities.## # xi. Mangrove# areas# characterized# by# one# or# any# combination# or# the# following# conditions:## a. with#primary#pristine#and#dense#young#growth;## b. adjoining#mouth#of#major#river#systems;## c. near#or#adjacent#to#traditional#productive#fry#or#fishing#grounds;## # xii. Areas#which#act#as#natural#buffers#against#natural#erosion,#strong#winds#and#storm# floods;## # xiii. Coral#reef#characterized#by#one#or#any#combination#of#the#following#conditions:## a. With#50%#and#above#coralline#cover;## b. Spawning#and#nursery#grounds#for#fish;## c. Which#act#as#natural#breakwater#of#coastlines.## # # It#is#expected#that#most#of#the#IXBUILD#subprojects#will#fall#within# either#Category#B#or#D.#For# Category#D#subprojects,#the#proponent#LGU#may#optionally#obtain#from#DENR#a#Certificate#of# NonXCoverage#(CNC)#but#PRDP#will#not#require#CNCs.#Category#B#subprojects#are#required#under# PEISS# to# undergo# Initial# Environmental# Examination# (IEE).# The# IEE# which# also# contains# Environmental# and# Social# Management# Plan# (ESMP)# will# serve# as# the# subproject’s# Environmental# Impact# Statement# (EIS)# which# will# undergo# review# by# DENR# resulting# in# the# 9! ! issuance#of#Environmental#Compliance#Certificate#(ECC).## # # Table&3.&Size&and&Scale&Thresholds&for&NonNEnvironmentally&Critical&Projects&in& Environmentally&Critically&Areas&(ECAs).&& ! Subproject& Project&Size& Category&B& Category&D& Parameters& Roads,# new# construction,# Length# with# no# critical# >#2km#but#<#20.0#km,# widening## slope#OR## or## <#2#km# length#with#critical#slope## >2km#but#<#10km## Bridges# Length## >#80m#but#<#10km# Regardless#of# length#for#foot# bridges;#<#80m# for#other# bridges# Irrigation# (Distribution# Service#area# 300#hectares#but# <#300#hectares# System#Only)# <1,000#hectares# Impounding#System#or# Reservoir#flooded#area# <#25#hectares#OR# # Flood#Control#Project## impounded#water#20# million#m3# Minor#Dams## Reservoir# flooded# area# <#25#hectares#AND#<# # and# Water# Storage# 20#million#m3# capacity# Potable#Water#Supply# Number# of# production# >#6#wells## # (Complete#System)# wells# Potable#Water#Supply# Distribution#supply#level# Level#III# Level#II#and# (Distribution#Only)# Level#I# Sea#Port,#Causeways,#and# Area#to#be#develop# <#15#hectares# <#1.0#hectares# Harbors## reclamation#OR#<#25# (w/o)# hectares#(w/o)# reclamation# reclamation)## Rice#Mill# Milling#Rate# >#1#ton/hr# <1#ton/hr# Poultry# Stock#Population# >10,000#heads#but#<# <#10,000#heads# 100,000#heads# Pigs/Goat#(enclosed)# Stock#Population## >#100#heads#but#<# <#100#heads# 5,000#heads# Fishery/Aquaculture# Total# water# spread# area# >1#hectares#but#<#25# <#1#hectare# Projects# (inlandXbased,# to#be#utilized# hectares# e.g.#lakes,#rivers,#etc.)# Fishery/Aquaculture# Total# water# spread# area# >#1#hectare#but#<#100# <#1#hectare# Projects#in#water#bodies# to#be#utilized# hectares# (coastal#areas)# # # The#actual#screening#of#subprojects#based#on#the#above#criteria#shall#be#done#by#the#proponent# LGU#with#the#assistance#from#higher#level#LGU#and/or#the#RPCO.#In#doing#so#and#especially#for# 10! ! subprojects#that#are#not#listed#above,#the#proponent#LGU#will#consult#the#latest#version#of#the# Procedural#Manual#for#DAO#30X2003#to#be#provided#by#the#RPCO#which#should#prevail#in#case#of# conflict# with# the# above# classification# guidelines.# While# the# project# is# not# envisaged# to# have# Category#A#subproject,#in#case#there#is/are#subprojects#falling#under#such#category,#as#well#as# Category# B,# the# proponent# LGU# shall# fill# up# INFORM# 1# and# submit# the# same# to# the# Regional# Environmental#Management#Bureau#(EMB)#for#evaluation.#The#World#Bank#will#do#prior#review# of#subprojects#falling#under#Category#A,#in#case#there#is#any.##& # (iii)&&Environmental&Guidelines&&& # Each#subproject#will#have#to#conform#to#the#technical#guidelines#and#specifications#prepared#for# each#type#of#subproject#(Annex#B).##For#the#most#common#subprojects#namely,#FarmXtoXMarket# Road,# Potable# Water# Supply# and# Communal# Irrigation,# illustrated# technical# guidelines# for# environmentally# sound# design# are# also# being# provided.# The# guidelines# also# include# requirements#of#other#World#Bank#Policies#that#are#relevant#to#the#subprojects.#These#are:# • Pest#Management:#DA’s#Integrated#Pest#Management#(KASAKALIKASAN)#Program,#shall# be# introduced# if# not# already# in# the# subproject# areas# and# enhanced# if# already# existing.# This#is#particularly#required#in#the#services#areas#of#communal#irrigation#subprojects#and# in#the#influence#areas#of#farmXtoXmarket#roads.#The#project#will#support#the#adoption#of# the#IPM#program#under#the#KASAKALIKASAN#program.# DA’s#IPM#Program#underscores#the#Philippine#government’s#commitment#to#Agenda#21# of# the# United# Nations# Conference# on# Environment# and# Development# in# promoting# sustainable# agriculture# and# rural# development.# The# program# trains,# empowers# and# develops# farmers’# skills# in# making# critical# and# informed# decisions# towards# a# more# productive,# profitable# and# sustainable# crop# production# system.# It# employs# an# experiential# learning# approach# through# the# Farmer# Field# Schools# (FFSs)# to# enable# farmers#to#practice#IPM.## The#IPM#training#process#effectively#involves#farmers#in#the#field#over#the#entire#season# of# crop# production# for# them# to# be# more# engaged# and# develop# their# capabilities# to# discover# and# hone# their# acquired# scientific# management# skills.# This# participatory,# experiential# and# discoveryXbased# learning# approach# has# been# highly# successful# in# sustaining# FFS# farmers# to# continue# to# adopt# IPM# principles# and# become# partner# advocates#for#a#healthy#rice,#corn#and#vegetable#production.#The#program#has#effected#a# significant#shift#in#agricultural#extension#exhibiting#farming#practices#with#reduced#use#of# insecticides# (particularly# from# toxic# to# nonXtoxic),# increased# insecticide# nonXusers,# and# reduced# frequency# of# insecticide# application.# DA# has# continued# to# instigate# partner# LGUs#to#mobilize#local#resources#and#support#for#IPM#which#has#been#instrumental#for# the#program#to#be#sustainable.### The#Program#will#expand#and#institute#DA’s#IPM#standard#approach#to#crop#husbandry# and# pest# management,# and# adopt# the# existing# guidelines# in# the# formulation# of# Pest# Management#Plan.#This#is#to#ensure#that#farmers#particularly#who#operate#in#the#service# 11! ! areas# of# irrigation# projects# and# those# tilling# agri# and# fisheryXbased# commodities# identified# along# the# value# chain# are# knowledgeable# on# proper# land# preparation,# water# and#nutrient#management#and#effective#insect,#pest#or#weeds#control.#The#Program#shall# further# strengthen# the# implementation# of# the# existing# regulations# on# the# use# of# agrichemicals# and# other# pesticides,# identify# banned# pesticides# and# compounds# from# usage,#and#formulate#mitigating#measures#to#lessen,#if#not#avoid,#the#hazards#to#human# health# and# the# environment# brought# by# pesticide# utilization.# It# shall# collaborate# with# research# institutions# and# technical# experts# with# whom# DA# has# been# partnering# for# capacityXbuilding# activities# to# ensure# full# integration# of# IPM# program# in# the# whole# production#system,#including#the#sustainability#of#the#natural#resources#and#protection# of#the#environment.######## • Natural# Habitat:# The# Project# will# not# fund# subprojects# that# are# located# within# or# that# encroach# into# any# declared# or# proposed# Protected# Area# of# natural# habitat.# The# subproject#proponent#must#show#that#the#farmXtoXmarket#roads#do#not#traverse#areas# of#critical#natural#habitat#and#that#irrigation#subprojects#do#not#result#in#the#conversion# of#areas#of#natural#habitat#for#use#in#rice#lands#or#other#agricultural#uses.# • Forest:# The# Project# will# not# fund# subprojects# that# encroach# into# forests.# Subprojects# must#not#result#in#reduced#access#of#traditional#forest#occupants#to#the#forest.# • Physical#Cultural#Resources:#The#Project#will#not#fund#subprojects#that#displace,#damage# or# render,# inaccessible# or# inoperable,# sites# or# structures# of# cultural# or# historical# significance.# • Safety#of#Dams:#(a)#The#Project#will#not#fund#dams#of#over#10#meters#in#height.#(b)#Dam# design#should#be#done#and/or#approved#by#a#qualified#engineer;#(c)#The#EAs#(in#the#FS)# of# subprojects# involving# dam# should# include# a# risk# assessment# of# dam# failure# and# corresponding#mitigating#measures#in#the#ESMP.##(d)#Subprojects#involving#dam#should# submit# a# dam# safety# plan.# Any# subproject# involving# dam# will# be# prior# reviewed# by# the# World#Bank#for#safeguards.# Subproject#proponents#(MLGUs,#PLGUs#or#Producer#Groups)#are#required#to#consult#with#these# guidelines# when# conceptualizing# and# preparing# their# subprojects.# During# the# safeguards# review/appraisal# by# RPCO,# the# subproject# location,# design# and# other# documentary# requirements# will# be# checked# for# conformance# to# and/or# compliance# with# the# relevant# guidelines.## (iv)&Environmental&and&Social&Management&Plan# # All#IXBUILD#and#IXREAP#subprojects#shall#undergo# rapid#Environmental#and#Social#Assessments# as#part#of#their#feasibility#studies.##The#environmental#and#social#assessments#(to#be#provided#as# part# of# the# feasibility# study# reports)# should# contain# sufficient# information# about# the# environmental#and#social#conditions#of#the#subproject#site#and#allow#the#proponent#to#prepare# the#Environmental#and#Social#Management#or#Mitigation#Plans#(ESMPs).#Annex#C#outlines#the# minimum# information# requirements# of# the# Environmental# and# Social# Assessments# in# the# 12! ! Subproject# Feasibility# Study# Report.# The# ESMPs# should# be# submitted# as# part# of# the# project# proposal# package# along# with# the# Feasibility# Study# reports# and# other# safeguards# documentary# requirements.# For# those# subprojects# not# covered# under# PEISS,# the# ESMP# shall# be# a# simple# standalone#matrix#containing:# a) the#issues#or#impacts#of#the#subproject;## b) their# brief# assessments# or# qualifications# of# their# significance# given# the# site’s# environmental#conditions;## c) the#proposed#mitigation#measures,#if#there#are#any#that#are#needed;##and,# d) the# means# of# implementation# of# the# measures# which# could# be# either# of# the# following:## 1) Engineering# design# specification# –# The# measure# will# be# incorporated# in# the# engineering#design# 2) Program#of#work#–#The#measure#shall#be#included#in#the#program#of#work# 3) Contract#–#The#measure#shall#be#part#of#the#construction#contract;## 4) O&M#–#As#part#of#the#LGU’s#operation#and#maintenance#program;### 5) IP#Policy#Framework;#and,# 6) Land#Acquisition,#Rehabilitation#and#Resettlement#Framework.# ESMP#Templates#have#been#developed#for#a#generic#subproject#and#those#that#were#frequently# proposed# under# MRDP2# subprojects# such# as# FarmXtoXMarket# Roads,# Communal# Irrigation# and# Potable# Water# Supply# (See# Annex# D).# All# IEEs/EIAs# and# ESMPs# shall# be# disclosed# at# the# PRDP# Website#at#least#one#week#prior#to#the#issuance#of#Safeguards#Clearance#by#the#RPCO/PSO.# For# subprojects# covered# under# PEISS,# the# ESMP# (Annex# E)# will# be# part# of# the# IEE/EIA# and# will# follow# the# DENR# prescribed# format,# provided# that# the# same# should# also# address# all# the# safeguards#policy#requirements#in#this#Framework.# 2.&3&Environmental&Monitoring# # Compliance# with# the# safeguards# requirements# and# ESMP# measures# by# the# subproject# proponent#and#any#actual#environmental#and#social#issues#associated#with#the#subproject#that# may# crop# up# during# the# course# of# subproject# preparation,# construction# and# operation# will# be# periodically# monitored.# The# subproject# proponent# is# required# to# submit# every# six# months# a# Compliance#and#Impact#Monitoring#Report#to#the#RPCO#using#the#form#provided#in#Annex#F.## 2.4&Institutional&Arrangements&for&Safeguards& & 13! ! Municipal&Project&Management&and&Implementing&Unit&(MPMIU)#–#The#MPMIU#shall#have#as# its#members#the#Municipal#Planning#and#Development#Officer#(MPDO),#the#Municipal#Engineer# or# anyone# who# is# an# engineer# by# profession,# and# another# one# who# is# an# environmental# practitioner#or#has#an# environmental# assessment/management# background# or# has# undergone# basic#training#in#environmental#safeguards.#The#MPMIU#shall#have#the#following#responsibilities:# The#MPMIU#shall:# • Help#communities#comply#with#the#safeguards#requirements# • Prepare#subprojects#according#to#this#Framework# • Submit#a#semiXannual#Safeguards#Compliance#and#Impact#Monitoring#Report#to#PPMIU# Provincial& Project& Management& and& Implementing& Unit& (PPMIU)# –# The# PPMIU# shall# likewise# have# as# its# members,# the# Provincial# Planning# and# Development# Officer# (PPDO),# the# Provincial# Engineer#or#anyone#who#is#an#engineer#by#profession,#and#the#Provincial#Environmental#Officer# or# anyone# who# is# an# environmental# practitioner# or# has# an# environment# assessment/management# background# or# has# undergone# basic# training# in# environmental# safeguards.#The#PPMIU#shall:# • Help#MLGU#comply#with#the#safeguards#requirements# • Prepare#subprojects#according#to#this#Framework# • Forward# all# semiXannual# Safeguards# Compliance# and# Impact# Monitoring# Reports# to# RPCO# Regional& Project& Coordination& Office& (RPCO)# –# The# RPCO# shall# have# one# Social# Safeguards# Specialist#and#Environmental#Safeguards#Specialist#and#a#team#of#rural#infrastructure#engineers# who# shall# undergo# training# in# environmental# and# social# safeguards# aspects# of# subproject# preparation,#review#and#approval.#The#RPCO#shall:# • Provide# assistance# to# the# LGUs/project# proponents# in# the# conduct# of# safeguards# activities#and#the#preparation#of#safeguards#documents;# • Provide# review# and# clearance# of# subprojects# on# the# safeguards# aspects# (Annex# D# provides#guidance#in#reviewing#the#safeguards#aspects#of#subprojects).# • Consolidate#all#Compliance#and#Impact#Monitoring#Reports#from#LGUs.# Project& Support& Office& (PSO)# –# The# PSO# shall# appoint# one# Social# Safeguards# Adviser# and# one# Environmental# Safeguards# Adviser# who# shall# work# very# closely# with# the# Rural# Infrastructure# Team.#The#PSO#shall:# • Provide#training#and#technical#assistance#to#RPCO#safeguards#specialists#and#engineering# team#as#well#as#selected#social#and#environmental#safeguards#focal#persons#of#PPMIUs# and#MPMIUs;# 14! ! • Review# and# clear# subprojects# before# submitting# them# to# the# World# Bank# for# no# objection.# • Consolidate#all#Compliance#and#Impact#Monitoring#Report#from#RPCOs#and#submit#them# to#the#NPCO.# National&Project&Coordinating&Office&(NPCO)#–#The#NPCO#shall#consolidate#all#Compliance#and# Impact# Monitoring# Reports# from# various# RPCOs# as# submitted# by# the# PSO# and# alert# Project# Management# of# any# systemic# compliance# issues# or# any# projectXwide# operational# policy# issues# affecting#the#Project’s#ability#to#comply#with#environmental#and#social#safeguards#requirements.# # World!Bank! National!Program!! # Coordination!Office! (WB)! (NPCO)! # # # Program!! Support!Office! # (PSO)!! # # !Regional!Program!! !Regional!Program!! # Coordination! Advisory!Board! Office! (RPAB)! # # !Provincial! National! # Planning! Commission!on! Management!and! Indigenous!People!! # Implementation! (NCIP)! Unit! # (PPMIU)! ! # !Environmental! !Municipal! Management! # Planning! Bureau! Management!and! (EMB)! # Implementation! ! Unit! # (MPMIU)! ! Figure#1.#Social#and#Environmental#Safeguards#Institutional#Arrangement.# 15! ! Table# 4# below# outlines# the# sequence# of# safeguardsXrelated# activities# and# their# lead# or# responsible#units,#at#various#stages#in#the#subproject#cycle.## Table&4.&Environmental&and&social&safeguards&activities&and&responsible&units.&& Stage&in&SP&Preparation& Safeguards&Activity& Responsible&Unit& Subproject# Conduct#Environmental#and# Subproject#proponent#with# Identification/Validation# Social#Screening# assistance#from#higher# level#LGU#and#RPCO#SES# Conduct#IP#Community# # Information#Campaign,#if# required# Feasibility#Study# Conduct#rapid#Environmental# Subproject#proponent#with# Preparation# and#Social#Assessment#(EA#and# assistance#from#higher# SA)# level#LGU#and#RPCO#SES# Conduct#IP#Community# # Consultation,#if#required# Prepare#Environmental#and# Subproject#proponent#with# Social#Management/Mitigation# assistance#from#level# Plan#(ESMP)# higher#LGU#and#RPCO#SES# Conduct#PAP#Survey# Subproject#proponent# Secure#IP#Endorsement# Subproject#proponent# Detailed#Engineering# Incorporation#of#relevant# Subproject#proponent## and#Program#of#Works# ESMP#measures#into#the# Preparation# design#and#program#of#works# ROW#acquisition#and# Subproject#proponent# documentation# PAP#resettlement#and/or# Subproject#proponent# compensation# Review#and#Approval# Safeguards#Review#and# RPCO/PSO,#SES#and#RI# issuance#of#clearance# Teams# Procurement#(Bidding,# Awarding)# None# # Construction# Compliance#Monitoring# PLGU#and#RPCO#SES#units# Turnover# Compliance#Evaluation# RPCO/PSO,#SES#and#RI# units# 16! ! 2.5&Assessment&of&PRDP&Year&1&Subprojects& ! The# PRDP# Year# 1# (Annex# A)subprojects# to# be# implemented# will# include# those# which# were# proposed# in# the# supposed# MRDP2# additional# financing# and# CPRDP.# Environmental# and# social# safeguards#requirement#of#Year#1#subprojects#will#be#prepared,#reviewed#and#approved#by#the# DA#following#the#existing#MRDP#Environmental#Framework#and#Guidelines#with#respect#to#their# technical# feasibility,# economic# viability# and# environmental# soundness.# Subproject’s# environmental# soundness,# i.e.# wellXmanaged# environmental# impacts,# its# design,# location# and# implementation,#should#be#formulated#according#to#the#environmental#guidelines#as#set#forth#in# this#framework.## At# the# PLGU# level,# environmental# screening# of# subprojects# should# determine# the# subproject# classification#according#to#Presidential#AO#No.#42#and#DAO#2003X30.#Once#their#classification#is# known,#appropriate#environmental#assessment#method#and#document#will#be#complied#for#the# application# of# an# Environmental# Compliance# Certificate# (ECC),# if# covered# by# the# PEISS,# or# a# Certificate# of# NonXCoverage# (CNC),# if# not# covered# by# PEISS,# whichever# is# appropriate.# For# subprojects#classified#as#Category#A#and#B,#the#PAO/MAO/PGENRO/MENRO#shall#fill#up#INFORM# 1# and# submit# the# same# to# the# Regional# Environmental# Management# Bureau# (EMB)# for# ECC# issuance.# It#is#anticipated#that#most#Year#1#subprojects#will#fall#under#Category#D#or#projects#that#are#not# covered#by#the#PEISS.#In#which#case,#subproject#proponent#may#secure#a#CNC.# 3& Indigenous&Peoples&Policy&Framework& 3.1&Rationale# # PRDP# will# likely# cover# areas# where# indigenous# cultural# communities# or# indigenous# peoples# (ICC/IP)# are# present.# There# is# thus# a# need# for# involvement# of# ICC/IPs# in# the# regional# and# provincial# level# planning# as# well# as# the# preparation# and# implementation# of# subprojects# and# ground# activities# in# their# localities.# Their# active# involvement# would# ensure# that# their# needs,# interests#and#concerns#are#considered#not#only#in#the#regional#and#provincial#plans#(i.e.#AFMP# and# PCIP)# but# also# in# the# design# and# final# configuration# of# specific# subprojects# under# IXBUILD# and#IXREAP#components.#In#addition,#there#is#a#need#to#avoid,#mitigate#and/or#compensate#any# adverse#effects#on#their#communities#caused#by#activities#supported#by#the#project.#For#these# reasons,#the#project#adopts#this#Indigenous#Peoples#Policy#Framework.# 3.2&IP&Policy&Framework&Objective&# # #This#Framework#complies#with#the#Philippines#Indigenous#Peoples#Rights#Act#(RA#8371)#and#the# World#Bank’s#Policy#on#Indigenous#Peoples#(OP/BP#4.10).##Its#main#objectives#are#to#ensure#that# the#interests,#needs#and#concerns#of#ICC/IPs#are#taken#into#consideration#in#the#formulation#of# regional#and#provincial#plans#and#in#the#design#and#implementation#of#specific#subprojects#near# or# within# their# communities# and/or# territories.# # More# specifically,# this# Framework# will# ensure# that:# 17! ! (a) #ICC/IPs#in#the#regions#and#provinces#are#able#to#meaningfully#participate#in#the#conduct# of#IXPLAN#activities,#including#the#preparation#of#the#Provincial#Commodity#Investment# Plan#(PCIP);# (b) The#selection,#screening#and#preparation#of##subprojects#under#IXBUILD#and#IXREAP#will# be# undertaken# # with# the# involvement# and# participation# of# the# IP# communities# in# the# target#areas##in#partnership#with#National#Commission#on#Indigenous#People#(NCIP)#and# the##Local#Government#Units#and#that:## (i) Whenever#the#proposed#subproject#site#is#located#within#or#will#directly# impact# on# any# declared# or# proposed# IP# Ancestral# Domain,# the# requirements# for# governmentXsponsored# development# projects# under# IPRA# as# stipulated# in# the# Free# and# Prior# Informed# Consent# (FPIC)# Guidelines# (i.e.# NCIP# Admin# Order# No.1# Series# of# 2006# or# its# successor# issuances)#are#complied#with;#otherwise,# (ii) If#the#project#site#is#situated#outside#any#declared#or#proposed#Ancestral# Domain#but#nevertheless#will#directly#affect#and/or#benefit#any#extant#IP# community# or# communities,# a# “free# and# prior# informed# consultationâ€?# is# undertaken,#resulting#in#“broad#community#supportâ€?#for#the#subproject.# 3.3&Indigenous&Peoples&Defined# # The#World#Bank#defines#“Indigenous#Peopleâ€?#as#a#distinct,#vulnerable,#social,#and#cultural#group# possession#the#following#characteristics#in#varying#degrees:# • SelfXidentification#as#members#of#a#distinct#indigenous#cultural#group#and#recognition#of# this#identity#by#others;## • Collective# attachment# to# geographically# distinct# habitats# or# ancestral# territories# in# the# project#area#and#to#the#natural#resources#in#these#habitats#and#territories;## • Customary# cultural,# economic,# social,# or# political# institutions# that# are# separate# from# those#of#the#dominant#society#and#culture;#and## • An# indigenous# language,# often# different# from# the# official# language# of# the# country# or# region.## Republic#Act#No.#8371,#otherwise#known#as#the#Indigenous#Peoples#Rights#Act#of#1997#(IPRA),# defines#“Indigenous#Peoplesâ€?#as:## • A#group#of#people#or#homogenous#societies#identified#by#selfXascription#and#ascription# by# others,# who# have# continuously# lived# as# organized# community# on# communally# bounded# and# defined# territory,# and# who# have,# under# claims# of# ownership# since# time# immemorial,# occupied,# possessed# and# utilized# such# territories,# sharing# common# bonds# of# language,# customs,# traditions,# and# other# distinctive# cultural# traits,# or# who# have,# 18! ! through# resistance# to# political,# social,# and# cultural# inroads# of# colonization,# nonX indigenous# religions# and# cultures,# became# historically# differentiated# from# the# majority# of#Filipinos.# •# Peoples# who# are# regarded# as# indigenous# on# account# of# their# descent# from# the# populations#which#inhabited#the#country#at#the#time#of#conquest#or#colonization#or#the# establishment# of# present# state# boundaries,# who# retain# some# or# all# of# their# social,# economic,# cultural,# and# political# institutions,# but# who# may# have# been# displaced# from# their#traditional#domains#or#who#may#have#resettled#outside#their#ancestral#domain! & ! ! ! ! ! ! & & & & & & & ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 19! ! 3.4&Indigenous&Peoples&in&the&Philippines&# # # # REGION&III&&& # REST&OF& SOUTHERN&&& ! NORTHERN&&& REGION&II,& LUZON/SIERRA& ISLAND&GROUPS& CENTRAL& EASTERN& CORDILLERA& WESTERN& # CARABALLO& MADRE& AND&REST&OF& MINDANAO& MINDANAO&& &®ION&1& MINDANAO& # MOUNTAIN& MOUNTAINS& VISAYAS& (RNXII)& (RNXI&&&& &(RNIX&&&RNX)& # (RNIII,RNIV&&&& RNXIII)& ! RNV)& • Bontoc# • Agta# • Ayta# • Agutaynon# • Arumanen# • BagoboXKlata# • Subanen# • Balangao# • Kalanguya • Abelling# • Tagbanua# • Teduray# • BagoboX • Subanen# • Isneg# XIkalahan# • Agta# • Cgayanen# • Manobo# Tagabaw# • Kalibugan# • Tinguian# • Bugkalot# • Dumagat# • Ke'ney#(Tao't# • ManoboX • ObuXManuvu# • Bagobo# • Kankanaey# • Isinai# • Remontado# bato)# Dulangan# • AtaXManobo# • UboX • KalanguyaX • Gaddan# • Bugkalot# • Batak# • ManoboX • AtaXMatigsalu# Manobo# Ikalahan# • Aggay# • AgtaXCimaron# • Pala'wan# Blit# • B'laan# • Mamanwa# • Karao# • Dumagat# • Kabihug# • Moolbog# • T'boli# • Tagakaulo# • Higaonon# • Iwak# • Ibanag# • Tagangon# • Iraya# • B'laan# • Manobo# • Talaindig# • Ibaloi# • Itawis# • Abiyan# Mangyan# • Lambangian# • Dibabawon# • Matigsalog# • Ayangan# • Ivatan# • Isarog# • Alangan# • Tasaday# • Mandaya# • Iranon# • Ifugao# • Iwak# • Itom# Mangyan,# • Kalagan# • Mansaka# • Sama/Bajao# • Tuwali# • Yogad# • AgtaX • Buhid# • Tagacaolo# • Sama# (LuaXan)# • Kalinga# • Ibatan# Tabangnon# • Mangyan# • ArmanonX • Mangguangan# • Manobo# • Bago# • Karao# • Tadyawan# Manobo# • Kalagan# • Bukidnon# • Applai# • Ilongot# • Bangon# • UboX • Agusan# • Umayamnon# • Isnag# • Ayagan# • Ratagnon# Menuvu# Manobo# • Tiguahanon# • IchbayatX • Ati# • B'laanX • Higaonon# • MatigsalogX ivatan# • Cuyunon# Tagakaulo# • Mamanwa# Manobo# • Kalanguya • Panay# • Banwaon# XAyangan# • Panay# Bukidnon# (Sulod/Tama ndok)# • BukidnonX Magahat# • BukidnonX Korolanos# • Ata# • Eskaya# • Calamianen# • Tagbanua# • Bantoanon# • PanayX BukidnonX Sulod# • IraynonX Bukidnon# # Source:#NCIP#Region#11.# # 20! ! 3.5&Social&Assessment&# # The#social#assessment#undertaken#at#the#beginning#of#Program#preparation#confirmed#that#the# IPs#are#among#the#poorest#in#the#provinces.#They#lack#basic#infrastructure#and#social#services.# They#are#also#the#least#benefited#by#government#rural#development#programs,#as#evidenced#by# the# small# number# of# projects# which# reach# their# communities.# Mostly# dominant# in# the# rolling# and# mountainous# areas,# the# IPs# verbalize# feelings# of# inferiority# as# compared# to# their# nonXIP# neighbors.#Most#IPs#perceive#that#they#have#the#least#access#to#agricultural#services,#education,# health# services# and# potable# water# supply,# and# they# are# gradually# losing# control# over# their# ancestral#land.## Focus#group#discussions#indicate#that#there#is#nothing#in#their#culture#or#traditions,#which#may# affect# their# successful# participation# in# any# project# which# will# benefit# their# communities.# IP# communities# value# consensus,# engage# in# communal# activities,# sharing# of# resources# and# are# generous#(which,#they#say,#lowlanders,#take#advantage#of).#Contrary#to#popular#beliefs,#IPs#are# currently#moving#slowly#into#crop#production#farming#systems.## The# above# experiences# and# marginalization# of# IPs# may# be# also# true# to# the# other# part# of# the# Philippines#such#as#Visayas#and#Luzon.#However,#during#the#focus#group#discussion#conducted# there# are# other# several# issues# identified# (i.e.# Dislocation# caused# by# intrusion# of# different# projects#into#their#ancestral#land,#developmental#aggression#and#conflicts#of#governance.## Furthermore,# focus# group# discussion# in# Visayas# and# Luzon# indicates# that# in# terms# of# socioX political##the#IPs#are#politically#disadvantaged#because#they#have#little#or#no#representation#in# local#government#units#much#more#in#the#national#level.#There#are#no#unified#efforts#among#IP# communities#to#put#forth#their#grievances#and#demands.#There#are#instances#that#the#highest# law#of#the#land#run#contrary#to#the#tribal#laws.##Economically,#indigenous#cultural#communities# of# Visayas# and# Luzon# are# of# great# disadvantage# through# the# following# issues# identified:# Traditionally,#IPs#are#farmers,#hunters#and#fishers.#They#have#limited#or#have#no#access#at#all#to# technical# researches# for# new# and# more# efficient# farm# implements,# technologies# # and# machineries# as# well# as# improved# plant# stock/seeds# that# lead# to# unproductive# and# uncompetitive#farming#operations.#Application#of#unsustainable#farming#systems/practices#that# lead#to#environmental#destruction.#Slash#and#burn#farming#practices#that#deplete#forest#cover# pushing# game# animals# further# in# the# wild# resulting# to# diminished# catch# for# hunters.# For# the# fisherfolks,#nonXIP#migrant#fishers#using#destructive#fishing#method#such#as#dynamite#&#cyanide# fishing#destroys#habitats#resulting#in#depleted#fish#stocks.#Bad#and#insufficient#farm#to#market# roads#results#to#expensive#farmXproduce#of#IPs#making#them#economically#uncompetitive#in#the# open/free#market.# # The#above#social#assessment#data#will#be#used#in#the#design#of#specific#assistance#for#the#IPs#as# well#to#orientate#and#sensitize#LGUs#and#other#institutions#working#with#IPs.# ! ! 21! ! 3.6&IP&Development&and&PRDP# # PRDP#through#its#various#components,#and#particularly#the#IXBUILD#and#IXREAP,#will#be#able#to# support#many#of#the#activities#included#in#their#Ancestral#Development#Sustainable#Protection# Plan.#PRDP#shall#ensure#that#Technical#Assistance#is#provided#to#enable#the#Indigenous#Peoples# to# participate# meaningfully# in# the# planning# process# under# the# IXPLAN.# This# may# mean# deployment# of# competent# and# committed# Program# partners# who# can# work# with# indigenous# communities# to# ensure# that# the# prioritized# plans# and# projects# of# IPs# as# reflected# in# their# ADSDPPs# are# supported# by# LGUs# and# integrated# into# barangay,# municipal,# and# provincial# investment#plans.## 3.7&Requirements&for&Subprojects# # All# subprojects# shall# undergo# rapid# Social# and# Environmental# Assessment# as# part# of# their# Feasibility# Studies.# This# should# result# in# the# preparation# of# Environmental# and# Social# Management# Plans# (ESMP)# (Please# refer# to# the# ESMP# templates# in# Annex# E).# # If# the# social# assessment#indicates#the#presence#of#Indigenous#People#Communities#in#the#proposed#project# site,#the#Subproject#ESMP#should#appropriately#reflect#that#IP#Policy#is#triggered.# In#order#to#be#approved#for#funding,#all#IXBUILD#and#IXREAP#subprojects#must#comply#with#the# following#requirements:# (a) Subprojects& that& overlap& or& are& located& inside& any& declared& or& proposed& IP& Ancestral& Domain& or& those& that,& while& not& located& inside,& will& directly& affect& any& declared& or& proposed&IP&Ancestral&Domain& Subprojects#under#this#category#will#comply#with#the#requirements#Indigenous#Peoples#Rights# Act# as# stipulated# in# the# Free# and# Prior# Informed# Consent# (FPIC)# Guidelines# (i.e.# NCIP# Admin# Order#No.#1#Series#of#2006),#particularly#Section#6B#and#Section#27#thereof.## For# subprojects# that# are# being# solicited# by# the# IP# community# themselves# or# those# that# are# already# identified# in# their# ADSDPPs,# there# would# be# no# need# to# undergo# the# Free# and# Prior# Informed#Consent#process.#Instead,#the#NCIP#will#only#need#to#validate#the#following:# (i)## The# ICC/IP,# in# fact,# voluntarily# solicited# or# initiated# the# plan,# program,# project# or# activity#to#be#undertaken;## (ii)## The#plan,#program,#project#or#activity#conforms#with#the#community’s#ADSDPP#or#in# the#absence#of#the#ADSDPP,#the#concerned#community#considers#the#same#to#form# part#already#of#the#ADSDPP#that#they#will#formulate#in#the#future;## (iii)## The#ICC/IP#knows#the#extent#of#the#plan,#program,#project#or#activity#and#its#socioX cultural/#environmental#impact#to#the#community;## (iv)# The#concerned#LGU#and#the#ICC/IP#community#acknowledge#their#obligations;#or## 22! ! (v)## The#subproject#activity#is#for#the#delivery#of#basic#services#or#for#the#establishment# of# social# enterprise# or# enterprise# development# involving# community# interest# affecting# land# and# resource# use# that# would# provide# employment# or# generate# income# to# improve# the# living# condition# and# economic# development# of# the# concerned#ICC/IP.# For# these# subprojects,# the# following# document# should# be# submitted# to# the# RPCO/PSO# as# part#of#the#subproject#proposal#package:# • An# NCIP# validation# report# or# an# NCIP# certification# affirming# that# conditions# (i)# to# (v)# above#have#been#met.## For#subprojects#that#were#neither#solicited#by#the#ICC/IP#nor#identified#in#their#ADSDPP#but#the# ICC/IP# are# themselves# the# primary# beneficiaries,# the# FPIC# process# will# not# be# required.# The# concerned# LGU# only# needs# to# formally# coordinate# with# NCIP# (or# include# the# NCIP# as# coX implementer#of#the#subproject)#who#will#then#validate#that#the#subproject#is#acceptable#to#the# intended#ICC/IP#beneficiaries,#either#because#the#same#conform#with#the#community’s#ADSDPP# or# shall# become# part# thereof# in# the# future.# # For# these# subprojects# the# following# document# should#be#submitted#to#the#RPCO/PSO#as#part#of#the#subproject#proposal#package:# • A# certification# by# NCIP# affirming# that# the# subproject# is# acceptable# to# the# intended# ICC/IP#beneficiaries,#either#because#the#same#conform#with#the#community’s#ADSDPP# or#shall#become#part#thereof#in#the#future#have#been#met.# However,# if# the# concerned# ICCs/IPs# are# not# the# primary# beneficiaries# of# the# subproject,# compliance# with# the# FPIC# process# will# be# required# as# described# in# Section# 27# of# the# FPIC# Guidelines.##For#these#subprojects,#the#following#documents#will#be#required:## • Free#and#Prior#Informed#Consent# • Memorandum#of#Agreement#with#the#IP#community# • Certificate#of#Precondition#issued#by#NCIP# # (b) Subprojects& located& outside& any& declared& or& proposed& Ancestral& Domain& but& are&& situated&within&or&will&affect&any&extant&IP&community&or&communities&& # Subprojects# under# this# category# are# those# subprojects# that# would# affect# IP# communities# that# are#outside#of#their#ancestral#domain#but#have#retained#their#IPness#as#defined#under#OP4.10.# Such#subprojects#are#required#to#undergo#a#process#of#“free#and#prior#informed#consultationâ€?# and#to#demonstrate#that#such#consultation#process#has#led#to#“broad#IP#community#supportâ€?#to# the#final#subproject#design/configuration.### # Free$and$Prior$Informed$Consultation.#Free#and#prior#informed#consultation#is#consultation#that# occurs#freely#and#voluntarily,#without#any#external#manipulation,#interference,#or#coercion,#for# which# the# parties# consulted# have# prior# access# to# information# on# the# intent# and# scope# of# the# proposed#project#in#a#culturally#appropriate#manner,#form,#and#language.# 23! ! Local# patterns# of# social# organization,# religious# beliefs,# and# resource# use# should# be# taken# into# account# in# the# consultation/participation# process# as# well# as# in# the# design# of# subprojects.# Existing# tribal# councils# recognized# by# the# NCIP# and# the# LGU# shall# be# tapped# as# the# liaison# between#the#participating#LGU#and#the#IP/ICC#community#in#all#activities#relating#to#PRDP.#The# following#should#be#observed#in#the#conduct#of#free#and#prior#informed#consultation:# (i)## Prior# to# consultation,# the# LGU# must# ensure# that# IP# members# have# access# to# information# about#the#project#in#general#and#the#subproject#in#particular.#Information#campaign#shall# be# conducted# in# local# language# or# in# language# that# is# widely# understood# by# the# IP# community.# This# could# be# done# through# the# local# tribal# council# and# in# culturally# appropriate#and#effective#manner.#Aside#from#providing#information#about#the#objectives# and# scope# of# the# proposed# subproject,# the# information# campaign# should# inform# the# IP# community#of#their#rights#to#participate#in#changing#the#subproject#design#if#it#violates#any# rights#or#is#contrary#to#the#traditions#and#cultural#practices#of#their#community;#their#rights# to#compensation#if#any#of#their#properties#are#affected;#and,#their#rights#to#partake#of#the# benefits#resulting#from#the#subproject.# (ii)## The#IP#community#should#be#given#adequate#lead#time#between#the#conduct#of#information# campaign# and# the# actual# consultation.# The# consultation# shall# be# conducted# early# in# the# subproject# preparation# and# shall,# if# necessary# or# if# required# by# the# IPs,# allow# for# an# iterative#process#to#arrive#at#consensus.## (iii)## Direct# dialogues# and# focused# group# discussions,# if# these# are# not# in# conflict# with# local# customs#and#traditional#ways#should#be#the#preferred#consultation#tool.##Attendance#by#IP# member# to# dialogues# and# meetings# should# however# be# strictly# voluntary.# The# concerned# RPCO#shall#ensure#that#the#IPs#are#not#coerced#to#attend#meetings.# The#entire#consultation#process#shall#be#undertaken#and#documented#by#the#concerned#LGUs.# The# following# documents# should# be# submitted# by# the# LGU# to# the# PSO/RPCO# as# part# of# the# subproject#proposal#package:### • Dated# information# campaign# materials# in# local# language# or# in# language# widely# understood#by#the#community;# • Dated# attendance# sheets# of# consultation# dialogues# or# Photographs# of# actual# consultation#sessions#undertaken;# • Dated#minutes#of#meetings#or#matrix#of#clarifications,#issues#and#concerns#raised#and# how#they#were#explained#or#addressed#by#the#LGU.# Broad$ Community$ Support$ 7The# subproject# is# deemed# to# have# attainted# broadXbased# community#support#when#the#great#majority#of#the#members#of#the#concerned#IP#community#or# communities# express# support# or# endorse# and# have# no# outstanding# concerns# about# the# subproject.#The#following#needs#to#be#submitted#as#part#of#the#subproject#proposal#package#to# demonstrate#broad#community#support:# • IP#community#endorsement#or#resolution#of#support#signed#by#individual#members#of#the# IP#community#or#communities;#or,# 24! ! • An#endorsement#signed#by#IP#community#leaders#(such#as#the#tribal#council#chairman#or# the#tribal#chieftain)#with#attestation#of#broad#based#member#support#by#the#NCIP.# 3.8&Damage&to&Cultural&Properties&or&Resources# # The# PRDP# must# ensure# that# none# of# its# infrastructure# or# related# projects# will# damage# irreplaceable#cultural#property#of#the#IP.#Setting#guidelines#for#all#subprojects#shall#include#strict# avoidance#of#cultural#resources#particularly#structures#of#cultural#and/or#historical#significance# and#known#archaeological#sites.#In#case#where#infrastructure#subprojects#that#already#received# broad# IP# community# support# or# consent# would# pass# through# sites# considered# as# cultural# properties# of# the# Indigenous# Peoples,# PRDP# must# exert# its# best# effort# to# relocate,# realign# or# redesign#the#subprojects,#so#that#these#sites#can#be#preserved#and#remain#intact#in#situ.#PRDP# will# not# fund# subprojects# that# would# displace,# damage,# render# inaccessible# and/or# render# inoperable#any#structures#that#are#deemed#to#have#high#cultural#and#historical#significance#by# either# the# IPs# or# the# mainstream# population.# # In# case# of# chance# finds# or# discovery# of# archaeological# artifacts# during# construction,# all# activities# in# the# affected# sites# must# be# suspended# while# PRDP# management# reports# the# finds# to# and# coordinates# with# the# National# Museum# or# the# proper# government# authority.# This# measure# for# chance# finds# should# be# reflected#in#the#Environmental#and#Social#Management#Plans#(ESMPs)#of#all#subprojects.# 3.9&Land&Acquisition&# # If#a#member#of#the#IP#community#will#have#either#of#his#land,#crops,#homes,#structures#and/or# other# properties# adversely# affected# by# the# proposed# subproject,# he/she# must# be# informed# of# the#his/her#rights#for#just#compensation#from#the#LGU#as#well#as#his/her#rights#to#partake#of#the# benefits#resulting#from#the#subproject.##The#compensation#for#affected#land,#crops,#homes#and# other# assets# of# individual# IP# members# will# follow# the# Policy# Framework# on# Land# Acquisition,# Resettlement# and# Rehabilitation# for# Project# Affected# Persons# (See# Land# Acquisition# Rehabilitation#and#Resettlement#Policy#Framework).# 3.10&Institutional&Arrangements&# # Municipal#Project#Management#and#Implementing#Unit#(MPMIU)#–#The#MPMIU#shall#have#as#its# members# the# Municipal# Planning# and# Development# Officer# (MPDO),# the# Local# NCIP,# the# Municipal# Engineer# or# anyone# who# is# an# engineer# by# profession,# and# another# one# who# is# an# environmental# practitioner# or# has# an# environmental# assessment/management# background# or# has#undergone#basic#training#in#environmental#safeguards.#The#MPMIU#shall#have#the#following# responsibilities:#The#MPMIU#shall:# • Help#communities#comply#with#the#safeguards#requirements# • Prepare#subprojects#according#to#this#Framework# • Submit#a#semiXannual#Safeguards#Compliance#and#Impact#Monitoring#Report#to#PPMIU# Provincial# Project# Management# and# Implementing# Unit# (PPMIU)# –# The# PPMIU# shall# likewise# 25! ! have#as#its#members,#the#Provincial#Planning#and#Development#Officer#(PPDO),#NCIP#Province,# the# Provincial# Engineer# or# anyone# who# is# an# engineer# by# profession,# and# the# Provincial# Environmental#Officer#or#anyone#who#is#an#environmental#practitioner#or#has#an#environment# assessment/management# background# or# has# undergone# basic# training# in# environmental# safeguards.#The#PPMIU#shall:# • Help#MLGU#comply#with#the#safeguards#requirements# • Prepare#subprojects#according#to#this#Framework# • Forward# all# semiXannual# Safeguards# Compliance# and# Impact# Monitoring# Reports# to# RPCO# Regional# Project# Coordination# Office# (RPCO)# –# The# RPCO# shall# have# one# Social# Safeguards# Specialist#and#Environmental#Safeguards#Specialist#and#a#team#of#rural#infrastructure#engineers# who# shall# undergo# training# in# environmental# and# social# safeguards# aspects# of# subproject# preparation,#review#and#approval.#The#RPCO#shall:# • Provide# assistance# to# the# LGUs/project# proponents# in# the# conduct# of# safeguards# activities#and#the#preparation#of#safeguards#documents;# • Provide# review# and# clearance# of# subprojects# on# the# safeguards# aspects# (Annex# D# provides#guidance#in#reviewing#the#safeguards#aspects#of#subprojects).# • Consolidate#all#Compliance#and#Impact#Monitoring#Reports#from#LGUs.# Project# Support# Office# (PSO)# –# The# PSO# shall# appoint# one# Social# Safeguards# Adviser# and# one# Environmental# Safeguards# Adviser# who# shall# work# very# closely# with# the# Rural# Infrastructure# Team.#The#PSO#shall:# • Provide#training#and#technical#assistance#to#RPCO#safeguards#specialists#and#engineering# team#as#well#as#selected#social#and#environmental#safeguards#focal#persons#of#PPMIUs# and#MPMIUs;# • Review# and# clear# subprojects# before# submitting# them# to# the# World# Bank# for# no# objection.# • Consolidate#all#Compliance#and#Impact#Monitoring#Report#from#RPCOs#and#submit#them# to#the#PCO.# National#Project#Coordinating#Office#(NPCO)#–#The#NPCO#shall#consolidate#all#Compliance#and# Impact#Monitoring#Reports#from#various#RPCOs#and#alert#Project#Management#of#any#systemic# compliance#issues#or#any#projectXwide#operational#policy#issues#affecting#the#Project’s#ability#to# comply#with#environmental#and#social#safeguards#requirements.# The# PCO# shall# seek# the# involvement# of# the# NCIP# as# coXimplementer# of# PRDP# particularly# on# subprojects# that# will# be# situated# within# any# IP# Ancestral# Domain# claims.# The# Program# 26! ! Management#shall#enter#into#an#agreement#with#NCIP,#spelling#out,#among#others#the#latter’s# role# in:# (a)# ensuring# that# IPs# participate# in# the# IXPLAN# activities# and# that# their# interests# and# concerns# are# considered# in# the# preparation# of# AFMPs# and# the# PCIPs;# and,# (b)# facilitating# compliance# of# subprojects# involving# IP# communities,# with# the# requirements# of# IPRA# as# described#in#this#Framework.# 3.11&Institutional&Capacity&# # Technical# assistance# and# required# funds# have# already# been# factored# into# the# project# for# PSO,# RPCO,#LGUs,#support#institutions#and#community#groups.## When# necessary# or# required# depending# on# the# IP# community# capacities# and# the# nature# and# complexities# of# intervention,# technical# assistance# will# be# provided# to# IP# communities# in# the# planning#of#priorities#and#in#designing#and#implementing#subprojects.## 3.12&Supervision,&Monitoring&and&Evaluation&# # The# PPMIU# shall# provide# direct# supervision# and# monitoring# of# the# implementation# of# and# compliance# with# this# Framework.# As# part# of# this# responsibility# the# PPMIU# shall# submit# semiX annual#reports#to#the#RPCO#containing#the#following#minimum#information:# • Involvement# of# IPs# in# the# preparation# of# PCIP# (Number# of# IPs,# segregated# by# gender# involved/consulted#in#the#preparation#of#PCIP);# • List# of# Subprojects# located# within# an# IP# community# and# status# of# compliance# with# the# requirements;## • List#of#Subprojects#located#within#Ancestral#Domain#and#status#of#compliance#with#the# requirements;#and,# • Status# of# the# implementation# of# the# agreed# measures# on# IP# issues,# including# if# any,# modification# of# subproject# design,# site# location# or# alignment,# compensation# and/or# benefits#sharing#plan.# The# report# shall,# together# with# the# reports# on# LARRF# and# EMFG# compliance,# be# incorporated# into#one#Safeguards#Compliance#Report#to#be#submitted#by#PPMIU#to#the#RPCO.#The#RPCO#shall# review#the#reports#and#conduct#random#spot#inspections#at#PPMIUs#and/or#subproject#sites#to# validate# and# further# evaluate# compliance.# It# shall# also# consolidate# all# PPMIUs# reports# and# its# findings# and# submit# the# same# to# the# PSO,# which# shall# in# turn# consolidate# all# reports# from# various#RPCOs#and#submit#a#copy#to#the#World#Bank.## 3.13&Costs&and&Financing# # The#costs#of#capacity#building#of#PSO,#RPCO#and#LGUs;#the#validation,#processing#and#review#of# subprojects# compliance# to# this# Framework;# and,# the# monitoring,# audit# and# evaluation# of# the# implementation# of# agreed# measures# resulting# from# the# application# of# this# Framework# have# been#included#in#the#costs#of#various#components#of#PRDP.# However,# the# cost# to# be# incurred# in# complying# with# this# Framework# shall# be# borne# by# the# subproject# proponent# (i.e.# the# concerned# LGU),# except# for# measures# that# are# part# of# the# 27! ! subproject# design# and# program# of# works# which# should# be# funded# as# part# of# the# Subproject# financing.# # 4& Land&Acquisition&Rehabilitation&and&Resettlement&Framework& 4.1&Rationale& # The# construction# of# rural# infrastructure# under# IXBUILD# and# postXharvest# and# other# facilities# under#IXREAP#are#unlikely#to#cause#massive#dislocation#of#homes#or#livelihood.##However,#right# of# ways# for# roads# and# irrigation# canals# as# well# as# the# sites# of# postXharvest# and# other# facilities# will# need# to# be# secured# which# may# require# a# few# homes# or# structures# to# be# relocated# to# adjacent# lots# or# rehabilitated# in# case# of# damage,# or# in# some# loss# of# crops.# Loss# of# lands# from# roads#and#canal#rightsXofX#way#and#sites#of#facilities#may#also#be#significant#for#some#smallholder# families# while# in# NRM# subprojects,# families# who# are# nonXmembers# or# choose# not# to# join# the# People’s#Organization#(PO)#organized#and/or#supported#by#the#project#could#lose#access#to#their# traditional#fishing#grounds,#hillside#farms#and/or#forestlands#as#POs/LGUs#impose#new#policies# and#rules#of#access#of#these#resources.##To#address#these#issues,#the#project#hereby#adopts#this# Land# Acquisition,# Rehabilitation# and# Resettlement# Policy# Framework# (LARRPF)# for# use# in# the# preparation#of#IXBUILD#and#IXREAP#subprojects.# 4.2&Principles&and&Objectives& # The# objectives# of# this# Land# Acquisition,# Rehabilitation# Resettlement# Framework# is# to# ensure# that#all#involuntary#losses#(i.e.#whether#lands,#structures,#crops#or#other#properties)#of#projectX affected#persons#(PAPs)#are#properly#and#justly#compensated#and#all#those#who#are#displaced# (whether#physically#or#economically)#are#resettled#and/or#provided#with#assistance#to#improve,# or#at#least#maintain,#their#preXProgram#living#standards#and#income#earning#capacity.# This# Framework# adopts# the# principles# outlined# in# the# World# Bank's# Involuntary# Resettlement# Policy#(OP/BP#4.12).#In#particular,#the#following#principles#shall#apply:# a)#Displacement#of#people#whether#physical#(i.e.#relocation#of#homes#to#another#area#far# away# from# the# original# abode)# or# economic# (i.e.# substantive# loss# of# livelihood# or# of# access# to# traditional# sources# of# livelihood)# will# be# avoided# where# feasible# and# acquisition#of#land#and#other#assets#will#be#minimized#as#much#as#possible.## b)# Where# it# is# not# feasible# to# avoid# displacement# ,# a# resettlement# plan# # shall# # be# conceived# and# executed# as# sustainable# development# programs,# providing# sufficient# investment#resources#to#enable#the#displaced#persons#to##improve#their#incomes#and# living#standards#at#least#back#to#preXdisplacement#levels;## c)# #Displaced# persons# will# be# consulted# and# will# have# opportunities# to# participate# in# planning#and#implementing#resettlement#plans;## 28! ! #d)#Any#involuntary#loss#or#involuntary#incurrence#of#damage#to#assets#(i.e.#lands,#homes,# structures#and#crops)#whether#such#loss#would#constitute#displacement#or#not,#shall# be# justly# compensated# through# mutually# agreed# compensation# scheme.# No# person# (whether#beneficiary#of#the#subproject#or#not)#shall#be#pressured#to#donate#assets#for# the#benefit#of#the#subprojects;#and,# e)# Persons# who# lost# more# than# 25%# of# their# productive# assets# shall# be# considered# economically#displaced#and#in#addition#to#just#compensation#of#the#lost#asset,#shall#be# provided#with#livelihood#assistance.# 4.3&Social&Assessments&and&Social&Management&Plan&& # All#IXBUILD#and#IXREAP#subprojects#shall#undergo#Social#Assessments#as#part#of#their#feasibility# studies.# # The# social# assessment# should# be# able# to# assess# the# extent# of# land# acquisition# and# displacements,#if#any,#due#to#the#subproject.#Land#acquisition#and#resettlement#issues,#if#any,# should#be#reflected#in#the#subproject’s#ESMP#(Please#see#ESMP#templates#in#Annex#D).#For#NRM# subprojects,# the# social# assessments# should# determine# potential# exclusion# or# involuntary# restriction#of#access#of#some#community#members#to#traditional#livelihood#sources#by#through# the#project.# 4.4&Entitlement&Policy& # Project# affected# persons# (PAPs)# will# be# entitled# to# the# following# types# of# compensation# and# rehabilitation#measures:# a)&PAPs&involuntarily&losing&residential&land&and&structures& i. The# provision# of# replacement# residential# land# (house# site# and# garden)# of# equivalent# size,# satisfactory# to# the# displaced# person;# and# cash# compensation# reflecting#full#replacement#cost#of#the#structures,#without#depreciation;# # ii. If#the#displaced#person#so#wishes#and#the#portion#of#the#land#to#be#lost#represents# 20%#or#less#of#the#total#area#of#the#residential#land#area,#and#the#remaining#land#is# still#a#viable#residential#lot,#cash#compensation#for#the#land#and#structure#lost,#at# full# replacement# cost# (market# value),# may# be# provided# to# the# person# in# lieu# of# a# replacement#house#and#lot#in#a#new#site;## # iii. If# after# acquisition,# the# remaining# residential# land# and/or# structure# is# insufficient# for#the#PAP#to#reestablish#his#home#,#then#at#the#request#of#the#displaced#person# the#entire#residential#land#and#structure#will#be#acquired#at#full#replacement#cost,# 1without#depreciation;#and,# # iv. If#the#PAP#is#a#tenant#who#has#rented#the#displaced#house#for#residential#purposes,# he/she# will# be# provided# with# a# cash# grant# of# three# months# rental# fee# at# the# prevailing# market# rate# in# the# area,# and# will# be# assisted# in# identifying# alternative# 29! ! accommodation.## # b)&&PAPs&involuntarily&losing&agricultural&land&and&crops&& & i. The#general#mechanism#for#compensation#of#lost#agricultural#land#will#be#through# provision# of# “land# for# land"# arrangements# of# equal# productive# capacity,# satisfactory# to# the# displaced# person.# However,# if# the# displaced# person# so# wishes# and#the#portion#of#the#land#to#be#lost#represents#20%#or#less#of#the#total#area#of# the# landholding,# and# the# remaining# land# is# still# a# viable# economic# holding,# cash# compensation,# at# full# replacement# cost# (market# value),# may# be# provided# to# the# person.#If#the#portion#of#the#land#to#be#lost#is#more#than#20%#of#the#total#area#of# the#landholding,#and#the#remaining#land#is#still#viable,#the#displaced#person#shall#be# justly# compensated# of# the# lost# asset# and# shall# be# provided# with# livelihood# assistance;## # ii. If# more# than# 20%# of# a# villager's# agricultural# land# is# acquired# and# the# remaining# holding#is#not#viable,#then#subject#to#PAPs#agreement#the#Program#will#acquire#the# entire# landholding# and# provide# compensation# of# the# acquired# land# at# direct# land# replacement;## # iii. PAPs# will# be# compensated# for# the# loss# of# standing# crops# and# fruit# or# industrial# trees#at#market#price;#and## # iv. PAPs,# whose# land# is# temporarily# taken# by# the# works# under# the# Program# will# be# compensated# for# their# loss# of# income,# standing# crops# and# for# the# cost# of# soil# restoration#and#damaged#infrastructure.## c)&&PAPs&involuntarily&losing&business&& i. The# mechanism# for# compensating# loss# of# business# will# be;# (1)# the# provision# of# alternative#business#site#of#equal#size#and#accessibility#to#customers,#satisfactory#to# the#displaced#person;#(2)#cash#compensation#for#lost#business#structure#reflecting# full# replacement# cost# of# the# structures,# without# depreciation;# and# (3)# cash# compensation#for#the#loss#of#income#during#the#transition#period.# # d)&PAPs&involuntarily&losing&means&of&livelihood&or&access&to&livelihood&& & i. PAPs# shall# be# provided# with# livelihood# assistance# and# support# within# the# community.# They# will# also# be# provided# compensation# at# full# replacement# cost,# without#depreciation#for#any#other#fixed#assets#affected#in#part#or# in#toto# by# the# project,#such#as#tombs#and#water#wells.#In#cases#where#community#infrastructure# such# as# schools,# factories,# water# sources,# roads,# sewage# systems# or# electrical# supply# is# damaged,# the# Program# will# ensure# that# these# would# be# restored# or# repaired#as#the#case#may#be,#at#no#cost#to#the#community.# 30! ! 4.5&People's&Participation&and&Consultation& # The#project#affected#and#displaced#persons#will#participate#throughout#the#various#stages#of#the# planning# and# implementation# of# the# rehabilitation# and# resettlement# activities.# For# these# purposes# and# prior# to# any# rehabilitation# and# resettlement# activities,# the# project# affected# and# displaced# persons# will# be# fully# informed# about# the# Program# and# about# the# provisions# of# this# Policy#at#meetings#held#by#the#respective#Program#staff#at#provincial#and#municipal#levels.# Each# project# affected# and# displaced# household# will# be# fully# consulted# about# acceptable# alternatives#and#options#and#informed#by#the#relevant#Program#staff#at#provincial#and#municipal# levels#of#their#entitlements#and#rehabilitation#options,#where#applicable.# 4.6&Donation# # The#property#owner#may#willfully#make#a#donation#of#his/her#property#or#any#part#of#it#that#is# affected# by# the# activities# for# the# rural# infrastructure# or# agricultural# projects# to# the# Local# Government# Unit.# The# deed# of# donation# should# be# duly# notarized# and# must# be# annotated# by# the#Registry#of#Deeds#or#by#any#authorized#agency.#The#Provincial/Municipal#LGU#will#shoulder# the# cost# of# resurvey# for# the# donated# portion# of# land.# It# is# assumed# that# Provincial# and/or# Municipal#Engineering#Offices#will#conduct#the#survey#for#the#adjustment#of#the#land#titles#and# just#real#property#tax#due.## To# ensure# that# the# donation# is# voluntary,# the# RPCO/PSO# should# validate# with# the# property# owner#whether#he/she#is#informed#of#his/her#right#to#receive#just#compensation#and#the#right# to# an# appraisal# along# with# the# offer# of# just# compensation.# The# deed# of# donation# shall# exhibit# voluntary#action#by#the#property#owner;#otherwise#this#will#not#be#accepted,#particularly#if#it#is#a# result#of#a#pressured#negotiation#between#the#property#owner#and#the#LGU.## 4.7&Resettlement&Plan& ! While!resettlement!is!not!expected!to!happen!under!the!project!similar!to!MRDP2,!in!case! any!resettlement!issues!crops!up!during!implementation,!the!resettlement!plan!will!have!to! be!prepared!by!the!subproject!following!below:!! 4.7.1&Inventory&and&Entitlement& # An# inventory# for# each# road,# bridge,# irrigation# canal,# water# supply# pipe# alignment# or# segment# thereof# will# be# prepared# by# the# Municipal# Project# Development# Officer# (MPDO)# and# other# municipal# agencies# concerned# with# resettlement# and# assisted# by# the# respective# Provincial# Program#Management#and#Implementation#Unit#(PPMIU).#This#will#be#approved#by#the#Regional# Program#Coordination#Office#(RPCO)#and#endorsed#by#the#Program#Support#Office#(PSO)#of#the# Department# of# Agriculture# (DA)# for# any# subproject# work# program,# to# the# World# Bank# (Manila# Office)#for#its#concurrence.# The# Inventory# shall# include# the# following# information# for# each# PAP’s# household# (see# Attachment#1,#Annex#G);# 31! ! a)##Number#of#persons#and#names;## b)##Amount#and#area#of#all#the#residential#plots#lost;## c)##Amount,#category/type#and#area#of#agricultural#land#lost;## d)##Quantity#and#types#of#crops#and#trees#lost;## e)##Quantity#and#category#of#any#fixed#assets#lost;## f)##Productive#assets#lost#as#a#percentage#of#total#productive#assets;#and## g)##Temporary#damage#to#productive#assets.## # The# entitlements# of# assets# and# land# affected# are# calculated# based# on# the# above# information# (see#Attachment#2,#Annex#G).# 4.7.2&Full&Resettlement&Plan&and&Survey& # In#cases#where#the#potential#adverse#impact#of#a#subproject#on#displaced#persons#is#major#(i.e.,# 200#people#or#more#are#displaced),#a#full#resettlement#plan#for#each#road#or#segment#of#road#or# irrigation#system#or#any#subproject#will#be#prepared#by#the#MPDO#and#assisted#by#the#PPMIU#in# accordance# with# the# provisions# of# this# Resettlement# Policy3.# The# full# resettlement# plan# will# include# among# others:# (a)# a# completed# inventory;# (b)# a# detailed# socioeconomic# survey# of# displaced# persons# describing# their# age,# sex,# ethnicity,# education,# main# occupation,# sources# of# income,# and# total# household# income# per# year# (see# Attachment# 3,# Annex# G);# (c)# detailed# compensation#and#entitlement#calculations#for#each#affected#household,#where#applicable;#(d)# location,#area#and#category#of#the#replacement#residential#and#agricultural#land#to#be#provided,# if#that#be#the#case;#(e)#a#timeXbound#action#plan#for#implementation;#(f)#a#detailed#budget#and# source# of# funding# for# the# various# compensation# measures;# and# (g)# arrangements# for# external# monitoring# and# evaluation.# Attachment# 4# in# Annex# G# provides# an# outline# of# information# required#by#a#full#resettlement#plan;#Attachment#5#shows#a#sample#checklist#of#land#acquisition# activities#under#PRDP.# 4.8&Institutional&Arrangements&for&Safeguards& & a.&Institutional&Arrangements& Municipal&Project&Management&and&Implementing&Unit&(MPMIU)#–#The#MPMIU#shall#have#as# its#members#the#Municipal#Planning#and#Development#Officer#(MPDO),#the#Municipal#Engineer# or#anyone#who#is#an#engineer#by#profession,#and#another#one#who#is#a#social#worker#or#has#a# social# and# environmental# assessment/management# background# or# has# undergone# basic# training#in#social#safeguards.#The#MPMIU#shall#have#the#following#responsibilities:#The#MPMIU# shall:# • Help#communities#comply#with#the#safeguards#requirements# • Prepare#subprojects#according#to#this#Framework# !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 3!Impacts#are#considered#minor#if#the#affected#people#are#not#physically#displaced#and#less#than#10%#of#their# productive#assets#are#lost.#If#the#reverse#were#to#occur,#the#impacts#will#be#considered#major.! 32! ! • Submit#a#semiXannual#Safeguards#Compliance#and#Impact#Monitoring#Report#to#PPMIU# Provincial& Project& Management& and& Implementing& Unit& (PPMIU)# –# The# PPMIU# shall# likewise# have#as#its#members,#the#Provincial#Planning#and#Development#Officer#(PPDO),##the#Provincial# Engineer#or#anyone#who#is#an#engineer#by#profession,#and#the#Provincial#Environmental#Officer# or#anyone#who#is#a#social#worker#or#has#a#social#assessment/management#background#or#has# undergone#basic#training#social#safeguards.#The#PPMIU#shall:# • Help#MLGU#comply#with#the#safeguards#requirements# • Prepare#subprojects#according#to#this#Framework# • Forward# all# semiXannual# Safeguards# Compliance# and# Impact# Monitoring# Reports# to# RPCO# Regional& Project& Coordination& Office& (RPCO)# –# The# RPCO# shall# have# one# Social# Safeguards# Specialist#and#Environmental#Safeguards#Specialist#and#a#team#of#rural#infrastructure#engineers# who# shall# undergo# training# in# environmental# and# social# safeguards# aspects# of# subproject# preparation,#review#and#approval.#The#RPCO#shall:# • Provide# assistance# to# the# LGUs/project# proponents# in# the# conduct# of# safeguards# activities#and#the#preparation#of#safeguards#documents;# • Provide# review# and# clearance# of# subprojects# on# the# safeguards# aspects# (Annex# D# provides#guidance#in#reviewing#the#safeguards#aspects#of#subprojects).# • Consolidate#all#Compliance#and#Impact#Monitoring#Reports#from#LGUs.# Project& Support& Office& (PSO)# –# The# PSO# shall# appoint# one# Social# Safeguards# Adviser# and# one# Environmental# Safeguards# Adviser# who# shall# work# very# closely# with# the# Rural# Infrastructure# Team.#The#PSO#shall:# • Provide#training#and#technical#assistance#to#RPCO#safeguards#specialists#and#engineering# team#as#well#as#selected#social#and#environmental#safeguards#focal#persons#of#PPMIUs# and#MPMIUs;# • Review# and# clear# subprojects# before# submitting# them# to# the# World# Bank# for# no# objection.# • Consolidate#all#Compliance#and#Impact#Monitoring#Report#from#RPCOs#and#submit#them# to#the#PCO.# National& Project& Coordinating& Office& (NPCO)# –# The# PCO# shall# consolidate# all# Compliance# and# Impact#Monitoring#Reports#from#various#RPCOs#and#alert#Project#Management#of#any#systemic# compliance#issues#or#any#projectXwide#operational#policy#issues#affecting#the#Project’s#ability#to# comply#with#environmental#and#social#safeguards#requirements.# 33! ! Table# 5# below# outlines# the# sequence# of# safeguardsXrelated# activities# and# their# lead# or# responsible#units,#at#various#stages#in#the#subproject#cycle.## & Table&5.&Environmental&and&social&safeguards&activities&and&responsible&units.&& Stage&in&SP&Preparation& Safeguards&Activity& Responsible&Unit& Subproject# Conduct#Environmental#and# Subproject#proponent#with# Identification/Validation# Social#Screening# assistance#from#higher#level# LGU#and#RPCO#SES# Conduct#IP#Community# # Information#Campaign,#if# required# Feasibility#Study# Conduct#Environmental#and# Subproject#proponent#with# Preparation# Social#Assessment#(EA#and#SA)# assistance#from#higher#level# LGU#and#RPCO#SES# Conduct#IP#Community# # Consultation,#if#required# Prepare#Environmental#and# Subproject#proponent#with# Social#Management/Mitigation# assistance#from#level#higher# Plan#(ESMP)# LGU#and#RPCO#SES# Conduct#PAP#Survey# Subproject#proponent# Secure#IP#Endorsement# Subproject#proponent# Detailed#Engineering# Incorporation#of#relevant# Subproject#proponent## and#Program#of#Works# ESMP#measures#into#the# Preparation# design#and#program#of#works# ROW#acquisition#and# Subproject#proponent# documentation# PAP#resettlement#and/or# Subproject#proponent# compensation# Review#and#Approval# Safeguards#Review#and# RPCO/PSO,#SES#and#RI# issuance#of#clearance# Teams# Procurement#(Bidding,# Awarding)# None# # Construction# Compliance#Monitoring# PLGU#and#RPCO#SES#units# Turnover# Compliance#Evaluation# RPCO/PSO,#SES#and#RI#units# & 34! ! b.&Implementation&Schedule& A#detailed#implementation#schedule#of#the#various#activities#to#be#undertaken#will#be#included# in#each#inventory#and#resettlement#plan.# Payment# of# compensation# and# provision# of# other# entitlements# (in# cash# or# inXkind)# shall# be# satisfactorily#completed#for#each#subproject#prior#to#the#World#Bank#giving#“no#objectionâ€?#for# award#of#contract#for#civil#works.# The#same#time#requirement#would#apply#if#displaced#persons#voluntarily#contribute#any#part#of# their#land#and/or#assets#for#the#subproject7.#That#is#all#deeds#of#donations#and#other#relevant# legal#documents#for#each#subproject#shall#be#satisfactorily#completed#prior#to#the#World#Bank# giving#“no#objectionâ€?#for#award#of#contract#for#civil#works.# c.&Complaints&and&Grievances& Complaints# and# grievances# relating# to# any# aspect# of# the# resettlement# entitlements# and/or# activities,#including#the#determined#area#and#price#of#the#lost#assets,#will#be#handled#as#follows:# i.## As#a#first#stage,#displaced#persons#will#present#their#complaints#and#grievances#to#the# Barangay#Committee,#which#will#have#to#provide#a#written#response#to#the#persons,# within#fifteen#(15)#calendar#days#of#receiving#the#complaint.#If#the#displaced#person# is#not#satisfied#with#the#decision#of#the#Committee;#the#person#may#present#the#case# to# the# MPDO# within# fifteen# (15)# calendar# days# of# receiving# the# written# response# from#the#Barangay#Committee.#The#decision#of#the#MPDO#should#be#rendered#within# thirty#(30)#calendar#days#of#receipt#of#the#displaced#person's#appeal,#and#can,#at#the# request# of# the# person# within# fifteen# (15)# days,# be# reviewed# and# rendered# a# judgment# by# the# PPIU.# The# decision# of# the# PPIU# will# be# provided# to# the# displaced# person#in#writing#within#thirty#(30)#calendar#days#of#the#request.# ii.## If#the#displaced#person#is#not#satisfied#with#the#decision#of#the#PPMIU,#the#case#may# be#submitted#for#consideration#by#the#DA#RPCO#and#the#PSO.# Displaced#persons#will#be#exempted#from#all#administrative#and#legal#fees.# d.&Supervision,&Monitoring&and&Evaluation& Implementation# of# the# inventories# and# resettlement# plans# will# be# regularly# supervised# and# monitored#by#the#respective#PPMIU#in#coordination#with#the#respective#MPDO.#The#findings#will# be#recorded#in#quarterly#reports#to#be#submitted#to#the#DA#RPCO#and#PSO.# Internal#monitoring#and#supervision#by#PPMIU#and#MPDO#will:# i. Verify# that# the# baseline# information# of# all# displaced# persons# has# been# carried# out# and#that#the#valuation#of#assets#lost#or#damaged,#the#provision#of#compensation#and# other# entitlements,# and# relocation# has# been# carried# out# in# accordance# with# the# provisions# of# this# Resettlement# Policy,# the# respective# inventory# and# resettlement# 35! ! plan.## ii. Oversee#that#the#inventory#and#resettlement#plan#is#implemented#as#designed#and# approved.## iii. Verify# that# funds# for# implementing# the# inventory# and# resettlement# plan# will# be# provided#by#the#MLGU#and/or#PLGU#to#the#Barangay#Committee#in#a#timely#manner# and# in# amounts# sufficient# for# their# purposes,# and# that# the# Barangay# Committee# in# accordance#with#the#provisions#of#the#respective#inventory#and#resettlement#uses#of# such#funds#plan.## iv. Record#all#grievances#and#their#resolution#and#ensure#that#complaints#are#dealt#with# in#timely#manner.## An#external#agency#or#agencies#will#be#retained#by#DA#PSO,#as#and#when#needed,#to#periodically# carry#out#independent#monitoring#and#evaluation#of#the#implementation#of#the#inventories#and# resettlement#plans.#The#external#agencies#can#be#from#academic#or#research#institutions,#nonX governmental# organizations# (NGO)# or# independent# consulting# firms,# all# with# qualified# and# experienced#staff#and#terms#of#reference#acceptable#to#the#World#Bank.# In# addition# to# verifying# the# information# submitted# in# the# internal# supervision# and# monitoring# reports# of# the# PPMIU,# the# external# monitoring# agency# will# visit# a# sample# of# 20%# of# displaced# persons#households#in#each#Province#prior#to#approval#of#civil#works#and/or#other#occasions#as# deemed#necessary#by#the#PSO.#The#external#monitor#will:# a) Determine# whether# the# procedures# for# displaced# persons# participation,# relocation# and#delivery#of#compensation#and#other#entitlements#has#been#done#in#accordance# with#this#Resettlement#Policy#and#the#respective#inventories#and#resettlement#plans.## # b) Assess# if# the# Resettlement# Policy's# objective# of# restoration# of# living# standards# and# income#levels#of#displaced#persons#have#been#met.## # c) Gather# qualitative# indications# of# the# social# and# economic# impact# of# Program# implementation#on#the#displaced#persons.## # d) Suggest# modification# in# the# implementation# procedures# of# the# inventories# and# resettlement#plans,#as#the#case#may#be,#to#achieve#the#principles#and#objectives#of# this#Resettlement#Policy.## e.&Costs&and&Budget& Each#inventory#and#resettlement#plan#will#include#detailed#cost#of#relocation,#compensation#and# other# entitlements,# with# a# breakdown# by# agricultural# land,# residential# land,# business# land,# houses,# business# and# other# assets.# The# cost# estimates# will# make# adequate# provision# for# contingencies.# 36! ! Sources#of#funding#for#the#various#inventories#and#resettlement#activities#will#be#shouldered#by# the#concern#Local#Government#Units.## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 37! ! ANNEXES # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 38! ! Annex!A! ! Types!of!Subprojects!Likely!to!be!Funded! ! ! a. Farm#to#Market#Road## b. Bridges# c. Irrigation# d. Rural#Water#Supply# e. Fish#Port# f. Fish#Landing# g. Guard#House/#Watch#Tower#(Fish#Sanctuary)# h. Tram#Lines# i. Cold#Storage# j. Trading#Posts# k. Green#Houses# l. Solar#Dryer# m. Nursery# n. Slope#Stabilization# o. Plantation#(High#Value#Crops)# p. Processing#Plants# q. Mariculture# ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 39! ! I"BUILD'Year'1'Subprojects'' Year'1'subprojects'under'PRDP'are'small'in'scale'and'are'considered'outside'the'purview'of'the'Philippine'EIA.'Consistent'with'this' framework'and'with'the'Philippine'EIA,'these'subprojects'are'not'required'to'prepare'IEEs'and/or'EIAs.'Nevertheless,'these'subprojects' will'adopt'the'illustrated'technical'planning'guidelines'to'ensure'that'engineering'and'safeguard'measures'are'taken'into'account'in'the' design'of'the'subprojects.' ' Location' SP' Physical'Target' Name'of'Sub"Project'(SP)' Categor Total' Province' Municipality' Barangay' y' Qty' Unit' 'New'Antque,' 'Zam.'Sibugay'' 'R.T.'Lim'' 'Rehabilitation'of'New'Atiqueto'Taruc'FMR'' 'FMR'' '1.02'' km' '6,466,957.95'' Taruc'' 'Zam.'Sibugay'' 'R.T.'Lim'' 'Sto'Rosario'' 'Rehab'of'Sto.'Rosario'to'Sitio'Penili'' 'FMR'' '3.14'' km' '8,193,562.57'' 'Zam.'Sibugay'' 'R.T.'Lim'' 'San'Antonio'' 'Rehab'of'Sto.'Antonio'V'Sitio'Lugame'' 'FMR'' '3.50'' km' '8,973,022.09'' 'Casacon,' 'Zam.'Sibugay'' 'R.T.'Lim'' 'Rehab'of'Brgy'Casacon'V'Tilasan'FMR'' 'FMR'' '3.64'' km' '10,904,480.62'' Tilasan'' 'Zam.'Sibugay'' 'Alicia'' 'Gulayon'' 'Rehabilitation'of'GulayonVSitio'Tantawan'FMR'' 'FMR'' '2.05'' km' '7,272,551.91'' 'Zam.'Sibugay'' Alicia' 'DawaVDawa'' Rehabilitation'of'DawaVDawaV'Tubig'Sina'FMR' FMR' 2.48' km' 6,507,215.00' 'San'Isidro,' 'Rehabilitation'of'San'IsidroVLimanonVLittle' 'Zam.'Sibugay'' 'Tungawan'' Limanon,'Little' 'FMR'' '8.13'' 'Km'' '48,520,856.33'' Margos'FMR'' Margos'' 'Zambo.'Sur'' 'Margosatubig'' 'Kailan,'Tulapok''' 'Rehab/Impr'of'Kalian'V'Tulapok'V'Sitio'Asinan'FMR'' 'FMR'' '5.60'' km' '26,460,943.52'' 'Zambo.'Sur'' 'V.'Sagun'' '' 'Rehab.'of'PoblacionVBrgy.'Limason'' 'FMR'' '3.14'' km' '9,462,087.73'' 'Zam.'Sibugay'' 'Talusan'' 'Bualan'' 'Construction/Rehab'of'Bualan'(upperVlower)'FMR'' 'FMR'' '1.30'' 'Km'' '4,669,088.89'' 'Pob'Tigbao,' 'Zambo.'Sur'' 'Tigbao'' 'Rehab/Impr.'Of'TuburanVTigbao'FMR'' 'FMR'' '6.38'' km' '49,791,893.65'' Tuburan'' 'Noque,' 'Zam.'Sibugay'' Olutanga' 'Rehab/Construction'of'NoqueVEsperanza'FMR'' 'FMR'' '3.82'' km' '25,715,522.65'' Esperanza'' 40! ! Location' SP' Physical'Target' Name'of'Sub"Project'(SP)' Categor Total' Province' Municipality' Barangay' y' Qty' Unit' 'Sitio'Lumbani,' Rehabilitation/Upgrading'of'Nat'l'Highway' Zambo.'Norte' Baliguian' FMR' 3.00' km' 24,975,958.88' Diculom'' JunctionVSitio'Lumbani'Diculom'FMR' 'Diculom,' Rehabilitation/Improvement'of'Sitio'Lumbani' Zambo.'Norte' Baliguian' FMR' 3.50' km' 18,541,304.09' Milidan'' DiculomVSitio'Legaspi'Milidan'FMR' 'Bagong'Silang,' Rehab/Upgrading'of'Bagong'SilangVMagsaysay' 'Zam.'Sibugay'' Siay' FMR' 6.960' km' 21,655,038.61' Magsaysay'' FMR' 'Kitabog,' 'Zam.'Sibugay'' 'Titay'' Rehab/Upgrading'of'Jct.'KitabogVCamanga'FMR' FMR' 3.0' Km' '5,800,000.00'' Camanga'' 'Pamintayan,' 'Rehabilitation/Upgrading'of'PamintayanVBawang' 'Zam.'Sibugay'' 'Buug'' 'FMR'' '3.6' km' '28,983,558.22'' Bawang'' FMR'' Rehab'of'Junction'National'Road'Sitio'Narugaran,' Bukidnon' Damulog' Pocopoco' Pocopoco'to'San'Isidro'Proper'FMR'with'one'(1)' FMR' 1.7' km' 13,353,616.95' unit'Double'Barrel'Box'Culvert'(4mx4mx7m)' Rehab'of''Kinapat'Road'to'Aludas'Proper'with'one' Bukidnon' Damulog' Aludas' (1)'unit'Single'Barrel'(2mx2mx7m)'and'one'(1)' FMR' 2.04' km' 19,280,471.31' unit'Double'Barrel'Box'Culverts'(4mx4mx7m)' Kibenton'and' Rehab/Improvement'of'5.04'km'KibentonVIntavas' Bukidnon' ImpasugVong' FMR' 5.04' km' 19,726,524.23' La'Fortuna' FMR'(3)' Balintawak'and' Bukidnon' Kibawe' Rehab'of'BalintawakVMarapange'FMR' FMR' 3.0' km' 12,514,375.28' Marapange' San'Luis'and' Bukidnon' Malitbog' Upgrading'of'San'LuisVTubodVOmagling'FMR' FMR' 4.0' km' 16,573,150.00' Omagling' San'Luis'and' Bukidnon' Malitbog' Upgrading'of'Junction'TomigbongVLarapan'FMR' FMR' 5.0' km' 15,965,500.00' Kiabo' Bukidnon' Sumilao' Puntian' Rehab'of'PuntianVSitio'Tambolaug'FMR' FMR' 6.02' km' 16,558,557.82' Simpak'and' Lanao'del'Norte' Lala' Rehab'of'SimpakVSta.'Cruz'Lower'FMR' FMR' 2.75' km' 5,550,000.00' Lower'Sta.'Cruz' Pinuyak'and' Lanao'del'Norte' Lala' Upgrading'of'PinuyakVSimpak'FMR' FMR' 2.37' km' 6,525,000.00' Simpak' Pinuyak'and' Lanao'del'Norte' Lala' Rehab'of'PinuyakVMaranding'FMR' FMR' 1.73' km' 3,225,000.00' Maranding' 41! ! Location' SP' Physical'Target' Name'of'Sub"Project'(SP)' Categor Total' Province' Municipality' Barangay' y' Qty' Unit' Rehabilitation'of'InasaganVSitio'CadaatanVCamp'3V' Lanao'del'Norte' Salvador' Inasagan' FMR' 8.00' km' 21,900,000.00' Mabatao'FMR' Taguranao,' Lanao'del'Norte' Tubod' Palao'and' Rehabilitation'of'TaguranaoVPalaoVDalama'FMR' FMR' 9.41' km' 23,655,125.56' Dalama' Camp'5'and' Lanao'del'Norte' Tubod' Rehab'of'Camp'5VKalilangan'FMR' FMR' 3.9770' km' 9,944,037.53' Kalilangan' Misamis' Aloran' Matipas' Improvement/Rehab'of'Matipas'FMR' FMR' 2.0' km' 4,728,608.72' Occidental' Dapacan'Bajo,' Misamis' Rehab/Reopening'of'Dapacan'BajoVBunawanV Calamba' Bunawan'and' FMR' 3.54' km' 15,178,098.22' Occidental' D’BAN'with'Spillway'Bridge' DBAN' Misamis' Irrigatio Calamba' '' Rehab'of'Siloy'Communal'Irrigation'System' 50' ha' 2,013,916.15' Occidental' n'' Misamis' Calamba' '' Rehab.'Of'SiloyVUpper'Dioyo'FMR' FMR' 6.50' km' 28,320,865.65' Occidental' Misamis' Guba,'Bernad' Rehab/Concreting of Canibungan Daku- Clarin' FMR' 4.24' km' 24,572,424.82' Occidental' and'Bitoon' Canibungan Putol FMR' Misamis' Rehab/Concreting'of'Canibungan'DakuV Clarin' '' FMR' 2.71' km' 9,307,305.24' Occidental' Canibungan'Putol'FMR' Misamis' Improvement/Rehab'of'4.54'km'Carmen'(Sitio' Jimenez' carmen' FMR' 4.54' km' 21,670,842.70' Occidental' Aquino)'FMR' Misamis' Casilak'San' Rehab/Improvement'of'2.26'km'Casilak'San' Tudela' FMR' 2.26' km' 6,302,904.36' Occidental' Agustin' Agustin'FMR' Misamis'Oriental' Claveria' Lanise' Rehab.'Of'LaniseVMabiniVSta'Cruz'FMR' FMR' 4.33' km' 12,804,882.51' Don'Gregorio' Misamis'Oriental' Claveria' Upgrading'of'Zone'1'to'Sitio'DugoVdugo'FMR' FMR' 3.00' km' 22,154,564.78' Pelaez' Jampason'and' Misamis'Oriental' Initao' Upgrading'of'JampasonV'Dagongon'FMR' FMR' 2.96' km' 7,488,000.00' Kanitoan' Gimangpang' Misamis'Oriental' Initao' Upgrading'of'GimampangVAlunaVCasilihon'FMR' FMR' 3.02' km' 8,927,000.00' and'Aluna' Misamis'Oriental' Initao' Kamelon,' Upgrading'of'SapongVMamiguisVBansilang'FMR' FMR' 5.61' km' 12,962,000.00' 42! ! Location' SP' Physical'Target' Name'of'Sub"Project'(SP)' Categor Total' Province' Municipality' Barangay' y' Qty' Unit' Calacapan'and' Sinalac' Misamis'Oriental' Kinoguitan' Panabol' Upgrading'of'PanabolVBuko'FMR' FMR' 1.34' km' 6,174,327.88' Misamis'Oriental' Kinoguitan' Calubo' Upgrading'of'CaluboVKitoktok'FMR' FMR' 1.16' km' 9,950,755.95' Misamis'Oriental' Kinoguitan' Calubo' Upgrading'of'CaluboVPoblacion'FMR' FMR' 1.72' km' 7,698,675.63' Misamis'Oriental' Kinoguitan' Salicapawan' Upgrading'of'SalicapawanVSuarez'FMR' FMR' 2.90' km' 19,927,089.47' Misamis'Oriental' Libertad' Poblacion' Upgrading'of'PugaVanVBitaugon'FMR' FMR' 1.80' km' 5,172,320.29' Misamis'Oriental' Magsaysay' Mindulao' Construction'of'Magsaysay'PWS'Level'II' PWS' 1.00' unit' 4,982,210.60' Upgrading'of'DawayanVLokongVCrossing' Misamis'Oriental' Villanueva' Dayawan' FMR' 3.74' km' 12,795,290.96' Mambuaya'FMR' Misamis'Oriental' Salay' '' Upgrading'of'3.9'km'Mimbule'FMR''' FMR' 3.90' km' '14,270,770.02' Prov.'Of'Davao' Rehabilitation'of'Pob'Datu'BalongV'Prk'Mamalian' Davao'del'Norte' Del'Norte'(San' '' FMR' '3.460'' km' '14,215,000.00'' FMR' Isidro)' Rehabilitation'of'Little'Panay'V'Katipunan'V'Kasilak' ' Davao'del'Norte' Panabo'City' '' FMR' FMR' FMR' 8.002'' 27,813,795.16' '1.402'' km' Rehabilitation'of'Purok'20,'Ising'FMR'with'Flat' '''''''''''''''' Davao'del'Norte' Carmen' '' FMR' ' Slab'Bridge'Component' lm' 12,015,818.14'' 12.000'' Davao'del'Norte' Kapalong' Mamacao' Reconstruction'of'Mamacao'Bridge' Bridge' '60.00'' lm' '19,760,000.00'' Rehabilitation'of'DacudaoVKapatagan,'New'Bohol' Davao'del'Norte' New'Corella' '' FMR' '6.87'' km' '30,447,300.00'' V'Mesaoy'FMR'with'Bridge'Component' Davao'del'Norte' Talaingod' Sto.'Nino'' Rehabilitation'of'Banoog'V'Gasa'V'Menopal'FMR' FMR' '7.524'' km' '28,955,100.00'' Davao'Oriental' Baganga' '' Const'of'Mikit'RCDG'Bridge' Bridge' '40.00'' lm' '14,000,000.00'' Davao'Oriental' Cateel' '' Construction'of'Sta.'Felomina'PWS' PWS' '1.000'' unit' '5,000,000.00'' Rehab'and'Construction'of'Bukobuko'Sa'Anay' Davao'Oriental' Boston' '' FMR' FMR' '7.86'' km' '48,250,097.19'' Davao'del'Sur' Kiblawan' '' Rehabilitation'of'MaragaVa'Gamay'to'Sitio' FMR' '5.190'' km' '18,138,682.08'' 43! ! Location' SP' Physical'Target' Name'of'Sub"Project'(SP)' Categor Total' Province' Municipality' Barangay' y' Qty' Unit' Pulatana'FMR' Davao'del'Sur' Malalag' '' Rehabilitation'of'IboVPitu'FMR'' FMR' '4.000'' km' '18,640,000.00'' Dualing,'San' North'Cotabato' Aleosan' Mateo'and'Sta.' Rehab'of'DualingVSan'MateoVSta.'Cruz'FMR' FMR' '2.76'' km' '8,915,136.50'' Cruz' San'Mateo'&' North'Cotabato' Aleosan' mampurok,' Rehab'of'San'MateoVMampurok,'Dualing'FMR' FMR' '2.62'' km' '9,615,612.48'' Dualing' North'Cotabato' Aleosan' Sitio'Baliwasan,' Rehab'of'Sitio'BalisawanVTomado'FMR' FMR' '3.50'' km' '5,854,545.12'' Tomado' North'Cotabato' Aleosan' Dunguan' Rehab'of'Sitio'Sulok,'Dungunan'FMR' FMR' '1.78'' km' '2,496,188.14'' North'Cotabato' Kabacan' Nangaan'and' Rehabilitation'of'Nangaan'VSimone'(Phase'II)'' FMR' '5.27'' km' Simone' '18,158,179.37'' North'Cotabato' Kidapawan'City' Katipunan' Rehab.'of''Maligaya''FMR' FMR' '3.42'' km' '27,656,783.70'' North'Cotabato' Libungan' Cabpangi' Concreting'of''Cabpangi'V'Katitisan''FMR' FMR' '1.00'' km' '5,260,674.88'' North'Cotabato' Libungan' Baguer'&' Concreting'of'BaguerVUlamian''FMR' FMR' '1.00'' km' '5,050,427.40'' Ulamina' North'Cotabato' Libungan' Batiocan'&' Concreting'of'BatiocanVDemapaco'FMR' FMR' '1.00'' km' '5,002,557.28'' Demapaco' North'Cotabato' Libungan' Poblacion'&' Concreting'of'GumagaVMatibong'FMR' FMR' '1.00'' km' '5,423,927.59'' Gumaga' North'Cotabato' Libungan' Gumaga' Concreting'of'PoblacionVGumaga'FMR' FMR' '0.60'' km' '2,722,987.43'' North'Cotabato' Libungan' Sinawingan'&' Concreting'of'SinawinganVGumaga''FMR' FMR' '1.00'' km' '5,282,526.84'' Gumaga' North'Cotabato' Midsayap' Upper'Bulanan' Concreting'&'Rehab'of'Upper'BulananVMalamote' FMR' '2.00'' km' '6,294,706.49'' &'Malamote' 44! ! Location' SP' Physical'Target' Name'of'Sub"Project'(SP)' Categor Total' Province' Municipality' Barangay' y' Qty' Unit' North'Cotabato' Pikit' Poblacuion'and' Improvement/Rehabilitaion'of'PobVBualan'FMR' FMR' '8.48'' km' '27,856,569.98'' Bualan' New'Panay,'F.' Cajelo,'New' Rehab'of'New'PanayVF'CajeloVNew'CulasiV North'Cotabato' Tulunan' FMR' '7.00'' km' KulasiV Kanibong' Kanibong' '24,449,096.08'' North'Cotabato' Tulunan' Rehab'of'ParaisoVDaig'FMR' FMR' '8.60'' km' Paraiso'&'Daig' '23,819,472.37'' Poblacion,' North'Cotabato' Tulunan' Sibsib'&'F.' Rehab'of'PobVSibsibVF.'Cajelo'FMR' FMR' '5.00'' km' Cajelo' '14,265,008.52'' Sultan'Kudarat' Esperanza' Laguiding'&' Const'of'NumoVDukay'PWS'Phase''II'(LII)' PWS' '1.00'' unit' '4,995,125.39'' Numo' Sultan'Kudarat' Esperanza' Laguiding'&' Const'of'NumoVDukay'PWS'Phase''III'(LII)' PWS' '1.00'' unit' '4,249,501.49'' Dukay' Sultan'Kudarat' Isulan' Kudanding' Rehab'of'Purok'2VSan'Matin'FMR' FMR' '1.780'' km' '5,746,692.07'' Sultan'Kudarat' Isulan' Tayugo' Rehab'of'TayugoVPaladongVBual'FMR' FMR' '1.809'' km' '5,062,129.68'' Sultan'Kudarat' Isulan' Bual' Rehab'of'BualVTalitay'FMR' FMR' '1.425'' km' '4,543,066.08'' Sultan'Kudarat' Isulan' Impao' Rehab'of'Purok'''MalipayonVLabintao'FMR' FMR' ' km' '4,962,051.58'' Sultan'Kudarat' Isulan' Dansuli' Rehab'of'Upper'DansuliVLabintao'FMR' FMR' '1.145'' km' '6,299,136.12'' Rehab'of'VeteransVMagsaysayVAngeles' Sultan'Kudarat' Isulan' FMR' '4.00'' km' '8,731,641.01'' Bambad' Mainuswagon''FMR' Sultan'Kudarat' Kalamansig' Rehab'of'New'MaatVSangay'FMR' FMR' '6.20'' km' '7,255,021.25'' Sangay' Sarangani' Kiamba' Kapate' Rehab/Opening'of'KapateVKomapilVKansan'FMR' FMR' '3.00'' km' '12,307,404.38'' Sarangani' Kiamba' Nalus' Rehabilitation/Opening'of'BocayVil'FMR' FMR' '2.00'' km' '11,986,222.72'' Sarangani' Maasim' Bales' Rehabilitation'of'Mutag'FMR' FMR' '4.48'' km' '16,722,866.18'' 45! ! Location' SP' Physical'Target' Name'of'Sub"Project'(SP)' Categor Total' Province' Municipality' Barangay' y' Qty' Unit' Sarangani' Maitum' Malalag'&' Improvement'of''MalalagV'Mabay'Seaside'FMR' FMR' '2.26'' km' Mabay' '14,923,918.40'' Sarangani' Maitum' Wali'&'Pangi' Improvement'of'Marang'FMR' FMR' '1.42'' km' '8,019,863.39'' Sarangani' Maitum' Sison'&'Pangi' Improvement'of'Saplon'FMR' FMR' '2.06'' km' '10,000,130.12'' Sarangani' Maitum' Pangi'&' Improvement'of'PangiVKiambing'FMR' FMR' '4.26'' km' '29,070,335.10'' Kiambing' South'Cotabato' Surallah' Canahay' Rehabilitation'of'Sitio'Nongon'Farm'to'Market'Rd.' FMR' '2.50'' km' '7,298,458.06'' Improvement'of'Brgy'Liberty''Potable'Water' South'Cotabato' Tampakan' PWS' '1.00'' unit' '4,107,831.83'' Liberty' System' South'Cotabato' Tupi' Kalkam/Cr' Rehab'of'KalkamVCrossing'RubberVPalian'FMR' FMR' '5.44'' km' Rubber/Palian' '13,321,132.86'' South'Cotabato' Sto''Nino' GuinsangVan' Construction'of'Potable'Water'system,'Level'II' PWS' '1.00'' unit' '4,832,222.65'' Poblacion,' South'Cotabato' Sto.'Niño' Sajaneba'&'San' Rehabilitation'of'CRBIVMagsaysay'FMR' FMR' '3.00'' km' Isidro' '9,915,007.47'' North'Cotabato' Matalam' Marva' Concreting'og'TaguranaoVMarva'FMR' FMR' '5.00'' km' '30,000,000.00'' South'Cotabato' Tampakan' Lampitak' Construction'of'Lampitak'PWS' FMR' '1.00'' unit' '4,949,118.14'' South'Cotabato' Banga' El'Nonok' Imp'&'Constn'of'KatipunanVLariosa'FMR' FMR' '3.70'' km' '11,307,487.49'' South'Cotabato' Norala' Poblacion' Rehab'of'Purok'TaurusVCentral'Balabago'FMR' FMR' '1.73'' km' '7,776,040.96'' North'Cotabato' Pres'Roxas' Poblacion'&' Rehab'of'PoblacionVMabuhay'FMr' FMR' '5.00'' km' '13,966,766.09'' mabuhay' North'Cotabato' Pres'Roxas' Greenhills' Rehab''of'GreenhillVNatipakan'FMR' FMR' '4.83'' km' '14,739,772.25'' Construction'of'300'l.m.'PCCP'&'Rehab'of'1.30'km' Sultan'Kudarat' Lambayong' FMR' '1.30'' km' '3,833,726.83'' Matiompong' E.'PeraltaVAsuncion'FMR'' Construction'of'300'l.m.'PCCP'&'Rehab'of'1.20'km' Sultan'Kudarat' Lambayong' FMR' '1.20'' km' '3,956,846.71'' Lagao' Lambay'SambilanVBalikakao'FMR'' 46! ! Location' SP' Physical'Target' Name'of'Sub"Project'(SP)' Categor Total' Province' Municipality' Barangay' y' Qty' Unit' Rehab'of'1.80'km'L.'AsertoVRodrigo'FMR'with'300' Sultan'Kudarat' Lambayong' FMR' '1.80'' km' '4,897,581.55'' Maligaya' l.m.'concreting' Rehab'of'1.50'km'Maskulado'Abellera'V'ARC2'FMR' Sultan'Kudarat' Lambayong' FMR' '1.50'' km' '5,433,901.15'' Tumiao' with'300'l.m.'concreting' Rehab'of'2.20'km'Vecenta'Daquiag'V'Sixto'Sabao' Sultan'Kudarat' Lambayong' FMR' '2.20'' km' '6,371,805.58'' Tumiao' FMR'with'300'l.m.'Concreting' ' Const'of'Single'Lane','120'lm'Libertad'PSCG'Bridge' Bridge' Agusan'del'Sur' Bunawan' Libertad' 120.00'' lm' 56,622,686.32' Agusan'del'Sur' '' Const.'Of'Labao'to'Batac'FMR'with'15.80'lm' FMR' '3.06'' km' 14,240,185.52' Esperanza' Agusan'del'Sur' '' Bridge' Bridge' '15.80'' lm' '7,079,353.76'' Agusan'del'Sur' Sta.'Josefa' '' Const'of'Upper'Sayon'VBrgy'Proper'FMR' FMR' '3.91'' km' 12,080,000.00' Agusan'del'Sur' Talacogon' '' Const'of'BatucanVMalihaoVMabini'FMR' FMR' '1.00'' km' 4,546,211.56' Agusan'del'Sur' Trento' '' Rehab.'Of'NRJ'Poblacion'VSitio'Lower'Lucad'FMR' FMR' '2.70'' km' 7,385,421.94' Agusan'del'Sur' Trento' '' Rehab.'Of'NRJ'Poblacion'VSitio'Mahayahay'FMR' FMR' '3.24'' km' 11,357,880.36' Agusan'del'Sur' Trento' '' Rehab'of'Sitio'Gasa'VAlgon'FMR' FMR' '2.78'' km' 6,990,469.65' ' Completion'of'Limbatangan'CIS' CIS' Agusan'del'Sur' Rosario' Libuac' 335.00'' ha' 40,000,000.00' Agusan'del'Sur' Veruela' Sampaguita' Const.'of'Mahayahay'V'Agda'FMR' FMR' '4.03'' km' 8,309,687.77' Agusan'del'Sur' Veruela' Sampaguita' Const'of'AnilaoVMahayahay'FMR' FMR' '3.00'' km' 7,809,286.39' Rehab'and'Const'of'AuroraVCamakawanVLa' FMR' Agusan'del'Sur' Prosperidad' Aurora' Fortuna'FMR' '4.70'' km' 16,053,111.67' Rehab'of'Sta'Irene'VSmokeVBoundary'Cebulan' FMR' Agusan'del'Sur' Prosperidad' '' FMR' '6.64'' km' 15,689,759.26' Agusan'del'Norte' Jabonga' '' Const/Improvement'of'Cuyago'CIS' CIS' '15.00'' ha' 2,000,000.00' Agusan'del'Norte' Kitcharao' Sangay' Const.'of'Sangay'V'Mahayahay'FMR' FMR' '1.56'' km' 3,575,952.39' Agusan'del'Norte' Kitcharao' Songkoy' Const.'of'Gamoton'V'Lake'Mainit'FMR' FMR' '1.00'' km' 3,462,348.90' Agusan'del'Norte' Kitcharao' Crossing' Construction'of'Four'segments'Lapucon'FMR' FMR' '1.42'' km' 3,987,540.88' ' BuntalidVSiringan'Small'Water'Impounding''Irr.Sys' ' 115.0 ' Agusan'del'Norte' Kitcharao' Poblacion' 0'' ha' 13,872,266.08'' Agusan'del'Norte' Nasipit' '' Rehab.'Of'Culit'CIS' CIS' ' ha' 7,197,848.74' 47! ! Location' SP' Physical'Target' Name'of'Sub"Project'(SP)' Categor Total' Province' Municipality' Barangay' y' Qty' Unit' 100.00'' Agusan'del'Norte' Santiago' Lapaz' Const.'of'LapazVE.Morgado'FMR' FMR' '2.70'' km' 12,649,669.58' Agusan'del'Norte' Santiago' '' Concreting'of'LapazVMandauy'FMR' FMR' 1.06' km' 7,011,957.07' Surigao'del'Sur' Barobo' Dughan' Rehab'of'DughanVCauswaganVSan'Roque''FMR' FMR' '6.00'' km' 21,407,579.89' Surigao'del'Sur' Carrascal' Gamuton' Const'of'Managas'Single'Lane'Bridge' Bridge' '36.00'' lm' 9,127,950.91' Surigao'del'Sur' Madrid' '' Const.'of'San'Vicente'Single'Lane'Flat'Slab'bridge' Bridge' '36.00'' lm' 10,565,209.41' Surigao'del'Sur' Madrid' '' Const'of'San'Vicente'CIP' CIP' 40' ha' 10,161,697.83' Surigao'del'Sur' Marihatag' '' Const'and'Rehab'of'Arorogan'to'Masekre'FMR' FMR' '3.60'' km' 16,995,239.40' Surigao'del'Sur' Marihatag' '' Const'of'1.5km'aroroganVsito'hunop'FMR' FMR' '1.50'' km' '8,250,000.00'' Surigao'del'Sur' Marihatag' '' Rehab'of'2.1km'MararagVAlegria'FMR' FMR' '3.40'' km' 18,500,000.00' ' Surigao'del'Sur' Marihatag' '' Rehab'of'5.5km'mararag'VSan'Antonio'FMR' FMR' '5.50'' km' 19,740,000.00' Surigao'del'Sur' Tandag' Maitom' Rehab.'Of'Maitom'CIS' CIS' '50.00'' ha' 6,800,000.00' Surigao'del'Sur' Tago' Capilihan' Const'of'CapilihanVPague'Vpague'FMR' FMR' '1.41'' km' 7,800,000.00' Surigao'del'Norte' Bacuag' '' Const'of'CambuayonVTalimogsayan'FMR'Phase'II' FMR' 2.305' km' 36,763,731.74' Surigao'del'Norte' Bacuag' '' Rehab./Const.'of'Tegase'FMR' FMR' '1.90'' km' 15,706,209.01' Rehab'&'Construction'of'Sto.'RosarioVSilop'FMR' FMR' Surigao'del'Norte' Bacuag' '' Phase'2' 2.1' km' 13,336,958.12' Surigao'del'Norte' Gigaquit' '' Const'of'SanVIsidro'VBalesaya'FMR' FMR' '1.017'' km' 4,264,501.97' Surigao'del'Norte' Gigaquit' '' Const/Rehab'of'MahanubVSan'Isidro'FMR' FMR' 1.11' km' 4,510,590.08' Rehab/Const'.'Of'BadVas'Tres'de'Mayo'V'Amoslog' FMR' Surigao'del'Norte' Placer' '' FMR' '4.25'' km' 17,248,086.01' ' Rehab./Const.'of'Gacepan'V'Mayag'FMR' FMR' Surigao'del'Norte' Sison' '' 1.8191'' km' 11,587,824.59' Const'of'Rizal'PreVstressed'concrete'Girder'Bridge' Bridge' Surigao'del'Norte' Socorro' '' and'approaches' '40.00'' lm' '21,862,617.11'' Surigao'del'Norte' Surigao'City' Silop' Rehab'of'Sitio'ProperVSitio'Tunga'Tunga'FMR' FMR' '2.15'' km' 6,450,000.00' Surigao'del'Norte' Surigao'City' '' Const'of'Sitio'KabugwasonVSitio'San'Roque'FMR' FMR' 1.2' km' 4,200,000.00' Surigao'del'Norte' Surigao'City' '' Const'of'Guiso'FMR' FMR' 1.273' km' 4,450,000.00' Surigao'del'Norte' Malimono' '' Const'of'Bunyasan'PWS' PWS' 1' unit' 4,779,766.95' Rehab/Const'of'Brgy'Tinago'FMR' FMR' Surigao'del'Norte' Malimono' '' 1.46' km' 10,060,997.28' 48! ! Location' SP' Physical'Target' Name'of'Sub"Project'(SP)' Categor Total' Province' Municipality' Barangay' y' Qty' Unit' Maguindanao' '' DOS' Rehab/Const'of'Sapalan'FMR' FMR' 3.8' km' 7,349,188.55' Maguindanao' '' DOS' Rehab'of'KusiongVTapian'FMR' FMR' 2.21' km' '6,581,544.48'' Maguindanao' '' Gen'SKP' Const.'of'Kaladturan'V'Midconding'FMR' 'FMR'' 2.3' km' '7,602,413.57'' ' Const'of'PanapanVLuayan'FMR' 'FMR'' Maguindanao' '' Mangudadatu' 1.38' km' 14,531,592.75'' Maguindanao' '' Ampatuan' Rehab/Concreting'of'Matagabong'FMR' 'FMR'' 2.27' km' '9,600,000.00'' Maguindanao' 1st' Parang' Rehab.'Of'MagsaysayVNItuan'FMR' 'FMR'' 1.50' km' '6,600,000.00'' Lanao'Del'Sur' '' Lumbatan' Construction'of'Dalama'FMR' 'FMR'' 3' km' '9,412,559.83'' Construction/Rehabilitation'Bubong'CadapaanV ' 'FMR'' Lanao'Del'Sur' '' Balindong' Barit'FMR' 3.2' km' 23,000,000.00'' LumbacaV Const'n'of'Lumbak'BacayawanVBrgy.'Calalaon' FMR' Lanao'Del'Sur' Unayan' FMR' 2.16' km' '6,600,000.00'' ' ' Const/Concreting'of'BaraoVBakikis'FMR' 'FMR'' Lanao'Del'Sur' '' Kapatagan' 10' km' 42,000,000.00'' 'Other' Taganak'Fishport' TawiVTawi' '' Turtle'Island' Infra'' 1' unit' '6,580,000.00'' TawiVTawi' Mapun' Rehab'of'SapahVDuhol'Batu' FMR' 5.00' km' 17,000,000.00'' TawiVTawi' ' '' Bongao' Const.'of'Tubig'Basag'to'LakitVLakit'Mandulan' FMR' 6.10' km' 19,500,000.00'' TawiVTawi' lone' Tandubas' Construction'of'Tandubas'PWS'Level'II' 'PWS'' 1.00' unit' '4,600,000.00'' TawiVTawi' Simunul' Construction'of'Panglima'MastulVLakkoan'FMR' FMR' 5.00' km' 15,897,700.00'' ' Panglima' Rehabilitation'of'Masaggaw'FMR' 'FMR'' TawiVTawi' lone' Sugala' 4.50' km' 10,500,000.00'' ' Constn./Conreting'of'SucatenVTumahubong'FMR' FMR' Basilan' Sumisip' 3.35' km' 16,750,000.00'' ' Rehab/Const.'of'Colonia,'LamitanVTablas,Tuburan' 'FMR'' Basilan' '' Lamitan' FMR' 4.96' km' 17,360,000.00'' Basilan' '' Lamitan' Rehab.of'lamitan'CIS' 'CIS'' 180.00' has' '9,218,547.00'' ' ! 49! ! Annex%B%% % Illustrated Technical Planning Guidelines A. RURAL ROADS 1. Establish appropriate design standards. Technical considerations in the design of rural roads shall vary according to the terrain, prevailing weather, vehicle types and most importantly the anticipated volume of traffic that shall utilize the road. Site selection and design criteria shall also include economic justification, reliability (either all-weather or allow reasonable level of delays during rainy season), tolerable roughness and speed, access to higher-level networks, and access to local social and economic services. A typical cross-section of rural roads is shown below. Traffic volume for this type of road should be in the range of 20-200 vehicles per day (vpd). For purposes of economic analysis, 50 vpd is normally used. Typical dimensions, depending on the agreed design standards appropriate for the locality are as follows:  Formation width 8 to 10 meters  Roadway 5 to 6 meters  Carriageway 3 to 4 meters  Shoulder ½ to 1 meter  Base or gravel course (Item 201) 10 to 15 cm  Sub-grade course (Item 200) 10 to 15 cm  Camber 5 to 8%  Embankment elevation at least ½ meter above flood level  Minimum curve radius 12m (flat and rolling); 8m (mountain) 2. Minimize earthworks. If the alignment lies on steep sidelong (steep slope) ground, the centerline has to be carefully located to minimize earthworks. However it should be located in favor of cut material, rather than fill, to reduce the risk of the fill material sliding down the slope. 3. Pay particular attention to drainage. The removal of surface water is crucial for the success of rural roads, since at this traffic level the weather causes more damage than does the traffic. This means that a good camber of 5 to 8%, adequate side drains, and carefully designed cross drainage structures are required. Where side ditches are provided, they must be equipped with scour checks if the gradient exceeds 4% and mitre drains (or turnouts) every 20 meters to protect against erosion. A typical scour check is shown in the following figure: Scour checks are to be installed every 5m (slope > 8%); 8m (8% > > 6%); 15m (< 6%) Whenever possible mitre drains should be constructed at intervals of 20 meters along the road alignment. Identify mitre drain locations before ditching in order to spare blocks from being excavated. Where the gradient of the mitre drain is more than 4%, scour checks might be required. A typical mitre drain or turnout is shown in the following figure: Catch water drains are usually required in hilly or mountainous terrain where there is a lot of surface water. This needs to be collected and safely led away before it reaches the excavated slope on the hillside. Where catch water drains have to be located outside the road right of way, cooperation with the landowners has to be sought. A typical catch water drain is shown below: Catch water drain too close to cut face with risk of landslip. Relief culverts or cross drainage structures are placed perpendicular to the (horizontal) road alignment. Stream culverts must be set out in the direction causing the lowest possible disruption to the natural flow of the watercourse. Drifts or spillways are very common structures especially in areas where rivers are seasonal. In case where a constant flow of water has to be accommodated, vented drifts are built. Short-span bridges can be built as box culverts or stone-arch culverts. Some principal features are provided in the following diagrams: 4. Common structures for sloped areas and raised roads. Special attention must be paid to slope stability. Existing alignments are usually fairly stable, and problem areas are obvious. However, new alignments can precipitate slip failure on uphill cut-faces, and create severe erosion problems downstream of drainage outlets. Considerable care must be taken with stabilization measures. Retaining walls are required on both the valley and mountain side depending on the stability of the material, especially where vegetation cannot stabilize the slopes. Retaining walls should be constructed using dry masonry for heights up to 4 meters and gabion walls for heights above 4 meters or where there is increased earth pressure. Cement-bound masonry should only be used where absolutely necessary. A typical design of dry masonry wall is shown below: Bio-engineering approaches, utilizing appropriate plants (e.g. vetiver grass) to solve structural and environmental problems, have proven very cost-effective in many areas. These sustainable methods are both labor-intensive and replicable for rural areas. An example of a bio- engineered retaining wall is shown below: Another example of a bio-engineered slope protection approach is shown as follows: Photos of Common Environmental Issues in Rural Roads ! Unlined earth canal suitable for flat Adequate camber ensures terrain; should be well maintained surface water is drained to keep flow unobstructed. towards side ditches. Well constructed, well drained road with unlined earth canal. (ARCDP2) Stone masonry lined canal is ideal in rolling and mountainous terrain, or where erosion and scouring due to high water flow velocity is anticipated. FMR with concrete/stone masonry lined canal. (ARCDP2) Vegetation control is an essential element of an effective routine maintenance program for rural roads. These overgrown weeds hinder efficient drainage. FMR with side ditches covered with overgrown vegetation. (ARCDP2) Road surface elevation must be raised at least ½ meter above flood water level. History of flooding in the area must be considered during planning and design stage. Grouted rip-rap is a common method of supporting raised embankment. FMR with raised embankment supported by concrete stone masonry or grouted rip-rap retaining walls. (ARCDP2) Mitre drains or turn-outs are missing. These should be provided every 20 meters in steep slopes. Shoulders are not well compacted. FMR above is provided with paved carriageway along steep gradient. (CMARPRP) Base course lacking in binder (fine material usually composed of clay and silt); gravel too loose with smooth rounded surface thus hard to compact and retain cohesiveness. Road surface is not according to specifications. (ARCDP2) Where needed, proper road signs should be installed to promote safety of road users. FMR above is provided with appropriate road sign. (ARCDP2) Cross-drainage relief culvert lacks protective wing-wall and apron, resulting in early damage to road due to scouring. Poorly designed drainage structure. (MRDP1) Poor site selection exposes the road to heavy damage from erosion. Road is too close to the bank of a major river. FMR damaged due to scouring. This spillway bridge is a more economical alternative to a conventional bridge. It allows temporary road closure during occasional high river flows. Above is an example of an overflow spillway bridge. Local ordinances allow village officials to enforce rules for proper O&M of the road, such as temporary closure during heavy rains or in collecting toll fees from road users. FMR provided with barrier to control vehicle passage on the road. Box culvert allows unobstructed passage of steam flow across the road, in cases where ordinary reinforced concrete pipes may be inadequate. Well designed box culvert. %% % % % % % Side ditches are missing or not well defined. Cross drainage structures are also lacking. Road surface loses its proper shape and camber. Base course materials are eroded and begin to disintegrate. Damage on the road carriageway due to poor drainage. (ARCDP2) Potential landslip here if not provided with slope protection. Side ditch here must be well defined or lined if possible. Steep side slopes on the right should be protected from possible landslide. (ARCDP2) Shown above is a member of the local O&M group doing his share in cleaning the road’s side canal. (ARCDP2) ! In some cases a concrete tire path may be a more practical alternative design for rural roads. (ASFP) Routine maintenance for drainage structures must include regular clearing of debris on reinforced concrete pipes’ inlets and outlets. ! Cross drainage structure half filled with debris. (MRDP1) REFERENCES AND FURTHER READING: Jerry Lebo and Dieter Schelling, Design and Appraisal of Rural Transport Infrastructure: Ensuring Access for Rural Communities; World Bank Technical Paper No. 496; available from http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/transport/publicat/twu-45.pdf Keller, G., and James Sherar (2003). Low-Volume Roads Engineering: Best Management Practices and Field Guide. Washington, DC: USAID, USDA, and Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; available from http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/24000/24600/24650/Index_BMP_Field_Guide.htm Republic of Zambia, Ministry of Works and Supply, Roads Department Training School, Contractor’s Handbook for Labour-Based Road Works, 2004. USAID (August 2006), EGSSAA, Part II Chapter 14 Rural Roads; available from http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/environment/compliance/ane/ane_guidelines/roads_ane.pdf World Bank (1997). Roads and the Environment: A Handbook. World Bank Technical Report TWU 13, and update WB Technical Paper No. 376. World Bank, Washington, D.C. (Part II details specific environmental, social, and other impacts); available from http://www.worldbank.org/transport/publicat/reh/toc.htm World Bank (March 2003), Technical Note on Rural Transport in Multi-Sectoral and Community Driven Projects, available from http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/transport/rural_tr/ms&cd_note/final_CDD%20and%20RT%20Note.pdf World Bank (June 2004), Africa Region, Environmental and Social Management Framework for World Bank Projects with Multiple Small-Scale Subprojects, A Toolkit. World Bank, EASES, Compendium of Environmental Screening and Guidelines for Road Projects World Bank (June 2004), Safeguards Thematic Review of Decentralized Projects in the Philippines, ESD Safeguard Dissemination Note No. 1.! % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % B. WATER SUPPLY Regulatory requirements: These guidelines are applicable for new construction or rehabilitation/improvement of Water Supply Systems (WSS) for the following project limits which are not required to secure an Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC), pursuant to DAO 03-30: • Level I - Point sources, e.g. rain collector, wells and springs, where a piped distribution system is not justified. • Level II - Communal faucet systems; generally for rural areas where houses are clustered densely enough to justify a piped distribution system with a faucet provided for a number of households. No person shall divert or appropriate water from any public water source such as rivers, creeks, brooks, springs, lakes, lagoons, swamps, marshes, subterranean, or groundwater and sea water, without first securing a Water Permit from the National Water Resources Board. Application forms and instruction for water permit applications are available at: http://www.nwrb.gov.ph/Uploads/wpafinaleditedsept6.pdf Water Permit Applications must be filed with the Office of the DPWH District Engineer, the NIA Provincial Irrigation Engineer, NPC Regional Manager or the LWUA Water District General Manager whichever is designated as agent by the Board in the province where the point of diversion is situated. The following are some basic technical guidelines in planning and implementing rural water supply systems. 1. Decide on the level of service to be provided – how, where, and in what quantities water will be delivered to users. System design options are: a. Single Point systems (Level 1), which usually consist of dug wells or small- diameter drilled wells from which water is drawn using a hand-pump. b. Standpipes or Communal Faucets (Level II): piped distribution systems which feed a limited number of public or communal taps, each of which serves all households, and other users, in the vicinity. c. Household Connection (Level III): piped systems which deliver water to taps in individual household compounds or homes. Definition and Features of Water Supply Systems ! Particulars Level I Level II 1. Definition Point source facility. Communal faucet system. Generally suitable for areas where More appropriate in areas where houses houses are sparsely distributed. are clustered. 2. Water source Drilled/driven shallow well. Drilled shallow/deep well. Drilled/driven deep well. Spring. Dug well. Infiltration gallery. Spring, Rain collector. 3. Water treatment Generally none. Generally none. Disinfection of wells is conducted periodically by local health authorities. 4. Distribution None Piped systems provided with reservoir(s). 5. Delivery of water At point (within 250-meter radius) Communal faucet (within 25-meter radius) 6. Service level 15 Hh/point source; 4 to 6 Hh/communal faucet 1 Hh/private well. 7. Consumption At least 20 lcpd At least 60 lcpd 2. Explore three (3) potential categories of sources of water: a. Groundwater – occurs under most of the world’s land surface, but there are great variations in the depths at which it is found, its mineral quality, the quantities present and the rates of infiltration (thus yield potential) and the nature of the ground above it (thus accessibility). In hilly areas it emerges from the ground in places as natural springs, otherwise wells have to be constructed and pumps or other lift mechanisms installed. Factor to consider for sitting wells Location: Locate the well at the highest point on the property. • Avoid positioning down slope from potential sources of contamination including • surface water flows and flooding conditions • Locate the well in a site easily accessible for maintenance. • Define a sanitary protective area around the well head that is kept in its natural state. Potential Contaminants: • Yield and quality of water supply will depend on soil type (which determines filtering capability and transmissivity) • Course gravel, limestone, and disintegrated rock can allow contaminants to travel quickly with little opportunity for natural purification. • Distance to nearest point of potential contamination is site and aquifer specific. The following MINIMUM distances from potential sources of contamination are best practice are best practice for sites with sand-like filtering capabilities: • 150ft (47.7m) from preparation area or storage area of spray materials, commercial fertilizer, or chemical that may cause contamination of the soil or groundwater. • 100 ft. (30.5m) from below – grade manure storage area. • 75ft (22.9m) from cesspools, leaching pits, and dry wells. • 50 ft (15.2m) from a buried sewer, septic tanks, subsurface disposal filed, grave animal or poultry yard or building, privy, or other contaminants that may drain into soil. • The distance between a septic tank each filed and a down-gradient well should be greater than 100ft (30.5m) if the soil is coarser than fine sand and the groundwater flow rate is greater than 0.03 ft/day (0.01m/day). • Source: Driscoll, Groundwater and Wells, Second Edition. The following are methods of developing sources of ground water: DUG DRIVEN DRILLED Hand-dug Well Historically, dug wells were excavated by hand shovel to below the water-table until incoming water exceeded the digger's bailing rate. The well was lined with stones, brick, tile, or other material to prevent collapse, and was covered with a cap of wood, stone, or concrete. Modern large-diameter dug wells are dug or bored by power equipment and typically are lined with concrete tile. Because of the type of construction large-diameter bored wells can go deeper beneath the water-table than can hand-dug wells. First section of casing Bucket Driven Well Driven-point (sand point) wells are constructed by driving assembled lengths of pipe into the ground with percussion equipment or by hand. These pipes are normally 2 inches or less in diameter and less than 50 feet deep. These can only be installed in areas having relatively loose soils, such as sand or gravel. Usually a screened well point is attached to the bottom of the casing before driving. Driven wells are relatively simple and economical to construct. This type of well poses a moderate to high risk and is easily contaminated from nearby surface sources. Sledge hammer Drive cap Pipe sections Intake screen Drive point Well point ! Jetted Well This method of well drilling involves the use of a high velocity stream or jet of fluid to cut a hole in the ground and transport the loosened material up and out of the hole. The equipment used may be the same equipment that is used for rotary drilling minus the bit. Protective casing should be installed to at least 25 feet and the well should be grouted to a minimum depth of 10 feet to protect the well against contamination from the surface. Jetted wells can only be installed in unconsolidated formations and are best suited for bore holes 4 inches in diameter. Bored Well An earth auger rotated, by hand or power, bores the hole and carries the earth to the surface. Casing is usually steel, concrete or plastic pipe. Bore hole diameter ranges from 50 to 200 mm. Bored wells can be up to 15 meters deep. Tripod Coupling Auger Drilled or Cable Tool Well Most modern wells are drilled, which requires a fairly complicated and expensive drill rig. Drill rigs are often mounted on big trucks. They use rotary drill bits that chew away at the rock, percussion bits that smash the rock, or, if the ground is soft, large auger bits. Drilled wells can be drilled more than 1,000 feet deep. Often a pump is placed at the bottom to push water up to the surface. Comparison of Types of Wells FACTOR WELL TYPE Hand-dug Driven Jetted Bored Cable Tool Soil excavated by Well point and Jet of water and Auger is rotated Bit rotated and pick and shovel steel pipe driven rotating action of and fills with soil, dropped to Method of sinking and lifted out by into ground. bit force pipe into lifted out of hole pulverize soil and shaft rope and bucket. ground. and emptied. rock; debris is mixed with water and lifted out with a bailing bucket or pump. Average diameter 1.0 – 1.3 m 30 – 50 mm 40 mm 50 – 200 mm 50 – 100 mm Maximum 10 m 8m 60 m 15 m 75 m practical depth Principal tools Pick, shovel, rope Sledge, drive Boring pipe, Augers, drill line, Motorized vehicle, and equipment and bucket, steel pipe, or drive raised platform or raised platform tripod, pulleys, form for concrete, weight, raised tripod, pump and ropes, heavy drill hoist for lowering platform hoses, jetting bits bits, suction casing pump, bailer Casing materials Cement, sand, Steel pipe Steel pipe Steel or concrete Steel pipe gravel, and water pipe (for concrete) Intake Porous concrete Specially-made Well screen Well screen or Well screen sections, or well point perforated pipe gravel-lined bottom Skill of workers Minimal Minimal Moderate Moderate Experienced Outside water No No Yes No Yes needed for construction Constructing Structures for Spring Development: Typical Spring Box Design Spring Box with Open Side Mounded soil Cover sloped to deflect rainwater Diversion ditch 8m above spring Screened overflow pipe Puddled clay Concrete apron Water bearing level Impervious layer Gravel Outlet to storage Large and small stones Spring Box with Open Bottom Seep Collection System Anti-seepage wall and collection box Preparation of spring box site to protect it from animals The following are actual sample sites of spring water sources: Watershed protection should be incorporated in the planning for O&M of developed spring water sources. (SZOPAD Social Fund) Rate of discharge and quality of spring water must be assessed during planning and design. (SZOPAD Social Fund) b. Rainwater collection – from roofs or larger catchment areas, can be utilized as a source of drinking water, particularly where there are no other safe water sources available (for example in areas where groundwater is polluted or too deep to economically tap). Guttering Collection area – corrugated iron roof Pre-filter Downpipe – movable Overflow for first flush rejection Washout tap Storage tank Outlet Gravel soak-away Typical domestic rainwater harvesting system, showing the main components of the system. Types of cisterns or rainwater collecting tanks CISTERN%TYPES% ! MATERIAL% FEATURE% CAUTION% PLASTIC% ! ! Garbage!Cans!(20.50!gallon)! Commercially!available,! Use!only!new!cans! inexpensive! Fiberglass! Commercially!available! Degradable,!requires!interior! coating! Polyethylene/Polypropylene! Commercially!available! Degradable,!require!exterior! coating! ! Alterable!and!moveable! ! METALS% ! ! Steel!Drums!(55!gallon)! Commercially!available! Verify!prior!use!for!toxics,! corrodes!and!rust,!small!capacity! ! Alterable!and!moveable! ! Galvanized!Steel!Tanks! Commercially!available! Possible!corrosion!and!rust! % Alterable!and!moveable! ! CONCRETE%AND%MASORY% ! ! Ferro!cement! Durable,!immoveable! Potential!to!crack!and!fall! Stone,!Concrete!Block! Durable,!immoveable! Difficult!to!maintain! Monolithic/Poured!in!Place! Durable,!immoveable! Potential!to!crack! Common rainwater treatment techniques TREATMENT TECHNIQUES METHOD LOCATION RESULT SCREENING Strainers and Leaf Screens Gutters and Leaders Prevent leaves and other debris from entering tank SETTLING Sedimentation Within tank Settles particulate matter FILTERING In-Line/Multi Cartridge After Pump Sleves sediments Activated Charcoal At Tap Removes chlorine Reverse Osmosis At Tap Remove Contaminants Mixed Media Separate Tank Traps particulate matter Slow Sand Separate Tank Traps particulate matter DISINFECTING Boiling/Distilling Before use Kills microorganism Chemical Treatment (Chlorine or Iodine) Within Tank or At Pump Kills Microorganisms (Liquid, tablet or granule Ultraviolet Light Ultraviolet Light systems Kills microorganism Should be located after the Activated carbon filter before trap Ozonation Before Tap Kills microorganisms *should only be use after chlorine or iodine has been used as a disinfectant. Ultra violent light and ozone system should be located after the activated carbon filter but before the tap. Above is a simple upflow sand filter for post treatment of stored water. c. Surface Water – in streams, lakes and ponds is readily available in many populated areas, but it is almost always polluted, often grossly so. It should only be used after some form of filtration if there are no other safe sources of water available. 3. Typical structures commonly used in rural water supply systems. Standpipe or communal faucet An individual meter per standpipe in this case allows the water users association more efficient and equitable collection of fees from household water users. Single point system (deep well) with Laundry Tub and Shed Concrete apron around the well prevents Good drainage provision contamination of source and keeps the area around the facility, to easier to clean. prevent contamination of well source and stagnant water in the vicinity. Communal faucet with laundry tub Multiple faucets allow several users to simultaneously tap from the standpipe Concrete apron and drainage keep the immediate vicinity clean and Flexible pipes/hoses tidy. leading to individual households nearby should not be allowed under this system. Elevated Concrete Water Tank/Reservoir Steel railings for safety of maintenance personnel Pump house Concrete Water Tank/Reservoir on Ground Water tanks should have Overflow outlet. roof cover to prevent evaporation, pollution and the breeding of mosquitoes. Outlet pipes to distribution system. Inlet pipe from water source Ferro-cement water tank for rainwater collection. Ferrocement tanks are cheaper to build and require less skilled labor. They are able to withstand shock better, as ferrocement is more flexible. Plastic tank for rainwater collection. Plastic tanks (fiberglass, polyethylene, or polypropylene) are readily available and movable. Provide gutter for the full length of the roof for wider Stainless tank as rainwater catchment area. collector; provides water for latrine. 4. Consider the following potential environmental impacts of water supply projects and their causes. Problems Possible Impacts Possible Causes 1. Depletion of fresh Destruction of the natural Overestimation of water supplies water resources resources Underestimation of water (surface and Destruction of Aquatic Life demand groundwater) Loss of economic productivity Over-pumping of water resources Loss of recreation areas Lack of information on resource Land subsidence yields Increase cost of water supplies in Waste and leakage of potable the future on in down-gradient water locations Poor water pricing policies and practices, leading to excessive use, waste and leakage 2. Chemical Concentration of pollution in Depletion of surface and degradation of the surface water source groundwater resources quality of potable Salt water intrusion (See above) water sources Poorer quality water, with Reduced stream flows (surface and associated health problems Run off/drainage from improper groundwater) Increased water treatment cost in solid and liquid waste or excreta the future on in down-gradient disposal locations 3. Creation of Stagnant Increase in vector-borne diseases Drainage systems lacking or (Standing) water poorly design Leakage from pipes/wastage from taps Lack of user/operator concern for stagnant water 4. Degradation of Alteration of ecosystem structure & Improper sitting of facilitites terrestrial, aquatic, function and loss of biodiversity (within wetlands or other and coastal habitats Loss of economic productivity sensitive habitats, etc.) Loss of natural beauty Poor construction practice Loss of recreational values Leakage/wastage from pipes and Soil erosion/sedimentation taps Increased population density/agricultural activity because of new water systems 5. Supply of Arsenic Poisoning Failure to test water quality Contaminated water Mercury Poisoning before developing the water Water-related infectious diseases resources Lack of ongoing water quality monitoring Inadequate protection of wells and water supply points Biological nitrite/nitrate and / or pesticide contamination Source: Adaptable from Alan Wyatt, William Hograwe and Eugene Brantlly (1992). Environmental Guidelines for PVOs and NGOs: Potable Water and Sanitation Projects. Water and Sanitation for health Project, USAID. 5. Adhere to the following minimum quality standards in water for human health: Selected Water Quality Standard for Human Helath • Arsenic ,0.01 mg/l • Total Coliforms = not detectable in any 100ml sample • Lead ,0.01 mg/L • Copper <2mg/L • Nitrate (as NO) ,50mg/L • Nitrite (as NO) ,<0.2 mg/L for long-term exposure • Fluoride 1.5 mg/l Reference: WHO, Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality (3rd Edition), 2004 Sanitation and Hydrology Preventing microbial contamination of groundwater sources depends on several factors: • Type of latrine – the rate of flow of pathogens-containing liquid from latrine pits to the soil beneath is proportional to the quality of liquid in the pit (static head). Dry latrines present the smallest risk of ground water contaminations. • Water table – a latrine pit must be above the water table during all seasons. 1.5m below the surface is the minimum depth necessary to ensure the pit content remain dry. The greater the distance between the base of the pit and the water table, the more time is required for pathogens to seep from the pit into the groundwater, thus allowing more pathogens to die-off naturally. • Soil type – Clay, Silt and fine sand soil types all have grain size small enough to act as natural filters for microbial contaminants (,0.2mm). certain clay soil can laso absorb viruses. • Distance to nearest water sources - the risk of contamination of a surface or ground water source by a latrine depends on the distance to the source, the direction and velocity of the flow of water in the soil (hydraulic gradient), and the soil/rock permeability. 30m is considered the minimum separation for most soil types. Balancing these factors to determined the best combination of sitting and sanitation technology should involve input from engineers and/or hydrologist. For more information, see S. Sugden, WELL factsheet: The Microbial Contamination of Water Supplies, 2004. http://www.lboro.ac.uk/well/resources/fact-sheets/fact-sheet-htm/Contamination.htm ! REFERENCES AND FURTHER READING: ! Brian Skinner, Bob Reed and Rod Shaw, Ferrocement Water Tanks, WEDC Loughborough University Leicestershire, available from http://www.paceproject.net/UserFiles/File/Water/Ferrocement.pdf Development Technology Unit, School of Engineering, University of Warwick, Recommendations for Designing Rainwater Harvesting System Tanks, January 2001, available from http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/eng/research/dtu/pubs/reviewed/rwh/eu/a6.pdf Netherlands Water Partnership (2006), Smart Water Solutions: Examples of innovative, low-cost technologies for wells, pumps, storage, irrigation and water treatment; available from http://www.edc-cu.org/pdf/Smart_Water_Solutions_ENG_V3.pdf USAID (1982), Water for the World Technical Notes available from http://www.lifewater.org/resources/tech_library.html Will Hart, Protective Structures for Springs: Spring Box Design, Construction and Maintenance, April 2003, available from http://www.cee.mtu.edu/peacecorps/documents_july03/springbox_FINAL.pdf World Bank (November 2004), Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Toolkit for Multisector Projects, available from http://www- wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2005/07/29/000012009_20050729090303/Rend ered/PDF/331630rev0PAPER0ENGLISH0rwss1pub.pdf ! % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % D. COMMUNAL IRRIGATION The following are the basic environmental safeguard requirements for irrigation subprojects: Regulatory requirements  For a communal irrigation system subproject (new or rehabilitation/improvement) with a service area of less than 300 hectares, the proponent, in this case the local government unit needs only to prepare and submit an Environmental Management Plan.  For an irrigation subproject with a service area of between 300 and 700 hectares, an Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Checklist should be submitted prior to securing an Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC) from the DENR.  For a subproject with service area greater than 700 hectares, an IEE Report is needed  A subproject with a service of area greater than 1,000 hectares should submit a municipal watershed management plan in addition to an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to be submitted to the DENR-EMB. Site selection, Planning and Design  Base the irrigation system design and capacity on adequate historical and updated information to correctly estimate the water requirement and the range of discharge or flow of the surface water source in varying seasons Upstream of a dam under construction for a CIP in Albay. (ARCDP2)  Integrate in the determination of water flows to be diverted the downstream river water requirements  Conduct water sampling and testing to assess water quality to determine if water is suited for irrigation and to establish baseline so that any future degradation and environmental/public health threats can be detected  Provide slope protection through bank compaction, rip-rapping on critical sections, or vegetative stabilization Additional slope protection built immediately downstream of the dam. Slope protection built immediately upstream of the dam. Construction  Designate a Spoils Storage Area, with topsoil set aside for later use and allow maximum re-use of spoils  Provision of adequate drainage system and proper grading of canals so that IS structure will not be prone to flooding & consequent erosion Concrete canal is best against erosion and seepage. Operation and Maintenance  Practice water-saving irrigation techniques, such as Controlled Irrigation, which has been shown to reduce water used in rice production by 16-35% without decreasing grain yield.  Continuous flooding, in contrast to Controlled Irrigation, not only wastes scarce water resources but also triggers too much leaching, soil nutrient imbalance (zinc deficiency), and lodging problems owing to weak base and anchorage of the plant. It also results in lesser and untimely water in the fields near the tail-end, high water-use in gravity irrigation systems, and too much water cost in pump irrigation systems.  Promote controlled application of agrochemicals based on the Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Plan  Training of the farmers on the proper selection, dosage and timing of agro-chem applications to ensure maximum absorption by the plant and soil  Periodic analysis of the irrigation water near the downstream part of the service area prior to exit to natural waterways  Regular removal of debris and other waste that may obstruct water flow Use just enough irrigation water during land preparation to facilitate soil puddling, organic matter decomposition, and land leveling. Photo courtesy of PhilRice Photo courtesy of PhilRice Promote the use of farm waste such as rice straw converted into compost as soil conditioner in irrigated farm lands to save on fertilizer expenses. Photo courtesy of PhilRice Slope protection using grass cover along the banks of irrigation canals. Photo courtesy of PhilRice Farmers clearing irrigation canals of debris that may obstruct water flow. IFAD Photo by Louis Dematteis IFAD Photo by Louis Dematteis CIS dam and diversion works Farmer adjusting the water flow of an irrigation canal. For subproject involving the construction, rehabilitation or improvement of irrigation system; a municipal watershed management plan shall be mandatory when the total area served by irrigation systems in the municipality exceeds 1000 hectares. Irrigation systems implemented by National Irrigation Administration (NIA), Asian Development Bank (ADB) and other entities are to be included in the computation of total area.! Small water impounding project A portion of the submerged area of a small water impounding project rehabilitated in Aumbay, Samal Island. (CMARPRP) Protection of watershed of this SWIP is essential for its long-term sustainability. This is a portion of the 57- hectare service area of the small water impounding project cited in the previous photo. (CMARPRP) ! REFERENCES ! PhilRice (2007), Controlled Irrigation: Saving water while having good yield, Rice Technology Bulletin 2007 No.59, PhilRice, Munoz, Nueva Ecija, Philippines; additional resources available from http://www.philrice.gov.ph/ USAID (August 2006), Environmental Guidelines, Part II: Guidance for Particular Sectors, Chapter 1 Agriculture: Soil and Water Resources including Irrigation; available from http://www.encapafrica.org/EGSSAA/agriculture.pdf ! % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Annex%C% % Guidance)for)the)preparation)of)the)Environmental)and)Social)Assessment)Portions)in)the) Subproject)Feasibility)Study)Reports)and)the)Environmental)and)Social) Management/Mitigation)Plan) ) ) I.))Preparation)of)Social)and)Environmental)Assessments)sections)of)the)Subproject)Feasibility) Study) The$ following$ should$ be$ considered$ in$ the$ conduct$ of$ the$ Social$ and$ Environmental$ Assessments$Sections$of$the$Subproject$Feasibility$Study.$$ $ A.)Social)Safeguard)Aspects) The$Social$Assessment$section$of$the$FS$should$provide$the$following$information:$ $ 1. Subproject-Beneficiaries$–$Who$are$the$beneficiaries$of$the$subproject?$What$is$their$ socioeconomic$status?$Have$they$been$consulted?$Describe$the$consultation$process$ (indicate$date,$location$and$attendees$of$meetings).$Have$they$accepted$the$proposed$ project?$What$are$their$concerns$and$inputs?$Describe$the$minutes$of$the$meetings$if$any?$ Are$the$women$represented$in$these$consultations$(describe$attendance$of$women)?$What$ are$their$concerns/inputs$(describe$any$particular$inputs$from$women,$if$any)?$ $ 2. Indigenous-Cultural-Community/Indigenous-Peoples-(ICC/IP))–$Is$the$project$located$inside$ an$ancestral$domain?$If$the$project$is$not$situated$inside$any$ancestral$domain,$is$it$going$to$ affect$any$extant$IP/ICC$community$or$are$there$beneficiaries$who$are$members$of$the$ IP/ICC$community?$What$particular$IP/ICC$community$is$involved?$What$is$their$ socioeconomic$status$as$compared$to$the$mainstream$group?$Did$the$IP/ICC$community$ solicit$the$subproject$themselves?$If$they$did$not$solicit$the$project,$have$they$been$ consulted$and$have$they$given$their$endorsement$of$the$project?$Describe$the$consultation$ process$thus$far$conducted.$Indicate$date,$location$and$attendees$of$meetings.$Describe$the$ minutes$of$the$meetings$if$any.$What$are$their$concerns$and$inputs?$ $ Note% that:% If% the% Project% is% inside% any% ancestral% domain,% or% if% there% are% any% intact% ICC/IP% community%to%be%affected%by%the%project,%either%of%the%following%should%be%secured:% i. Certificate% from% the% local% tribal% chieftain,% or% from% the% local% tribal% council% or% from% NCIP% that% the% project% is% part% of% the% ICC?IP’s% development% plan% or% is% part% of% their% Ancestral%Domain%Sustainable%Development%and%Protection%Plan%(ADSDPP);% ii. Certificate%from%the%local%tribal%chieftain%that%the%project%is%solicited%by%the%ICC?IP% themselves;%or,% iii. An% endorsement% (e.g.% in% a% form% of% a% Resolution)% from% ICC/IP% community% together% with% evidence% of% consultations% conducted% (e.g.% minutes% of% meetings% and% list% of% attendees,%issues%and%concerns%raised%and%how%they%were%addressed).% $ $ 3. Site-and-RightCofCWay-acquisition)–$What$is$the$ownership$status$of$the$proposed$site$or$ rightLofLway?$Describe$the$site$requirement$in$terms$of$area$(sq.$m),$land$tenure,$and$ existing$land$use.$Describe$the$rightLofLway$requirements$in$terms$of$width,$the$types,$ ownership$of$lands$and$existing$land$use$of$the$lands$to$be$traversed$by$the$subprojects.$ $ Note% that:% If% any% lands% or% ROW% need% to% be% acquired% by% the% LGU% or% the% beneficiary% community,%the%following%are%the%documentary%should%be%secured:% i. If%the%land%is%public%land,%a%Special%Land%Use%Permit%(SLUP)%or%lease%from%DENR% ii. If%the%land%is%owned%by%LGU,%evidence%of%LGU%ownership%such%as%Title% iii. If% the% land% is% to% be% purchased% by% the% LGU% from% private% owner(s),% evidence% of% purchase%by%the%LGU%such%as%Deeds%of%Sale%or%TCTs% iv. If% land% is% donated% by% private% owners,% Deed% of% Donation% and% annotation% of% the% property%at%the%Registry%of%Deeds% $ If% the% subproject% is% inside% Ancestral% Domain% or% if% not% inside,% it% adversely% affects% an% extant% IP/ICC%community%who%are%not%themselves%beneficiaries%of%the%subprojects,%then%an%FPIC/CP% should%be%secured%under%the%auspices%of%the%NCIP.%% $ 4. Damage-to-standing-crops,-houses-and/or-properties$–$Will$the$construction$of$the$project$ result$to$any$crop$and/or$properties?$Describe$and$try$to$quantify$the$potential$damage.$ $ Note%that%(potential)%damage%to%crops%and/or%properties/assets%should%be%inventoried%and% suitable%compensation%schemes%should%be%worked%out%through%consultation%with%the%owners% of% the% crops% and% properties% (e.g.% through% a% MOA% or% the% Entitlement% Survey% Form).% Compensation% of% damages% following% the% agreed% schemes% should% be% based% on% actual% damage%or%loss.% % 5. Physical-displacement-of-persons$–$Will$the$proposed$subproject$result$in$the$relocation$of$ houses?$ How$ many$ houses$ will$ be$ relocated?$ Describe$ the$ conditions$ of$ the$ affected$ houses$and$properties.$What$are$the$socioeconomic$conditions$of$the$affected$households?$ $ 6. Economic- displacement- of- persons$ –Will$ the$ proposed$ subproject$ result$ in$ the$ loss$ of$ livelihood$ or$ reduced$ access$ of$ families$ to$ their$ traditional$ livelihood$ sources?$ Note$ that$ loss$of$livelihood$may$result$from:$loss$of$a$significant$portion$of$the$household’s$farmland,$ loss$of$business$such$as$due$to$loss$of$vending$stalls,$etc.$Describe$the$nature$of$loss$if$any.$ $ Note% that% if% there% is% physical% or% economic% displacement% of% persons,% a% Resettlement- Plan- shall%be%prepared% % ) ) B.)Environmental)Safeguard)Aspects)) $ The$Environmental$Assessment$Section$of$the$FS$should$provide$adequate$information$on$the$ following:$ $ 1.) Natural- habitat$ –Describe$ the$ project$ site$ (i.e.,$ the$ lands$ to$ be$ traversed$ by$ the$ proposed$ road,$ the$ actual$ site$ of$ the$ PWS$ or$ structure,$ etc.)$ in$ terms$ of$ land$ use,$ vegetation,$ wildlife,$ presence$of$water$ecosystems,$endangered$and$other$important$species.$How$are$they$going$to$ be$ impacted$ by$ the$ project?$ Is$ the$ project$ site$ within$ an$ officially$ declared$ or$ proposed$ protected$area$of$natural$habitat?$ Note%that:%PRDP%loan%should%not%be%used%to%fund%subprojects%involving%civil%works%that%encroach% into% Protected% Areas% of% natural% habitat% such% as% areas% declared% as% Natural% Parks% under% NIPAS,% expect%for%NRM%subprojects%that%are%allowed%as%per%provisions%of%the%NIPAS%law%of%Buffer%Zone,% or%Multiple%Use%Zone,%and%the%law%creating%the%Natural%Park.% % 2.) Physical- Cultural- Resources$ –$ Are$ there$ any$ structure,$ monuments$ or$ Physical$ Cultural$ Resources$ (as$ defined$ below)$ on$ site$ that$ will$ be$ affected$ by$ the$ subproject?$ Describe$ the$ cultural$and$historical$significance$of$the$structure/s,$if$any.$Describe$the$impact$of$the$project$ to$the$structure/s.$Is$the$project$site$part$of$an$important$natural$feature$or$landscape?$How$ will$the$project$change$or$impact$the$landscape?$Is$the$project$area$a$potential$archaeological$ site?$If$there$are$no$such$structures$or$monuments$or$Physical$Cultural$Resources$to$be$affected,$ the$assessment$should$clearly$say$so.$ Note%that:%%The%World%Bank%Policy%on%Physical%Cultural%Resources%requires%that%physical%cultural% resources% likely% to% be% affected% by% the% project% should% be% identified% and% the% project’s% potential% impacts% on% these% resources% be% assessed% as% an% integral% part% of% the% EA.% Cultural% resources% are% defined% as% movable% or% immovable% objects,% sites,% structures,% groups% of% structures,% and% natural% features% and% landscapes% that% have% archaeological,% paleontological,% historical,% architectural,% religious,%aesthetic,%or%other%cultural%significance.%%%% When% the% project% is% likely% to% have% adverse% impacts% on% physical% cultural% resources,% appropriate% measures%for%avoiding%or%mitigating%these%impacts%shall%be%identified%in%the%EA.%%These%measures% may%range%from%full%site%protection%to%selective%mitigation,%including%salvage%and%documentation,% in%cases%where%a%portion%or%all%of%the%physical%cultural%resources%may%be%lost.%% If% the% area% is% a% potential% archaeological% site,% the% mitigation% plan% should% include% provisions% for% managing% chance% finds.% For% example:% in% case% of% archaeological% finds% during% construction,% civil% works%must%be%immediately%suspended%and%the%National%Museum%contacted.%% % 3.-Terrain,-Soil-Types-and-Rainfall-–- What$is$the$topography$of$the$proposed$subproject$site?$ What$is$the$type$of$soil?$Describe$the$soil$in$terms$of$looseness$and$erosion$potential.$What$is$ the$amount$of$rainfall$in$the$area?$$ Note%for%FMR:%if%all%these%factors%are%present%(i.e.%the%terrain%is%hilly,%the%soil%is%generally%loose,% and%rainfall%in%the%area%is%generally%heavy)%such%that%the%potential%for%sedimentation%and%erosion% is% high,% corresponding% fortifications/items% in% the% design% may% be% warranted% (i.e.,% extra% slope% protection% works,% concrete% pavement,% and% canal% lining,% etc.)% as% opposed% to% the% standard% subproject%design.% - 4.-Drainage-Situations-and-Flooding-Potential-–)Describe$the$drainage$situation$of$the$project$ site.$How$is$it$going$to$be$impacted$by$the$proposed$subprojects?$$$ $ 5.--Impacts-during-Construction)–)Describe$the$civil$works$and$construction$activities$to$be$done,$ including$ temporary$ facilities$ for$ the$ construction$ materials$ and$ construction$ employees.$ Construction$ activities$ may$ result$ also$ in$ destruction$ of$ sensitive$ vegetation$ and$ may$ temporarily$disturb$wildlife.$The$health$of$safety$of$workers$and$the$public$may$also$be$at$stake$ due$ to$ a$ specific$ activity$ or$ physical$ hazard$ present$ at$ the$ site.$ Describe$ and$ assess$ if$ any$ of$ these$ impacts$ are$ significant$ given$ the$ present$ environmental$ conditions$ of$ the$ sites$ and$ identify$ the$ necessary$ mitigation$ measures$ which$ the$ contractors$ should$ observe$ during$ construction.$The$following$should$be$considered:$ (a)% Temporary% erosion% and% sediment% control% –% Erosion$ and$ sediment$ control$ in$ construction$ areas$will$prevent$sediment$discharge$to$nearby$streams$and$lakes.$Areas$cleared$of$vegetation$ for$ construction$ and$ roadway$ development$ should$ be$ minimized$ and$ slopes$ should$ be$ stabilized.$ Overland$ drainage$ should$ be$ controlled$ to$ prevent$ channeling$ and$ sediment$ transport$ by$ diverting$ flows$ from$ areas$ where$ soils$ are$ exposed,$ and/or$ by$ providing$ filter$ barriers$or$settling$basins$to$remove$sediment$before$the$runoff$is$discharged$to$surface$waters.$$ (b)$ Construction% noise% mitigation$ –$ Are$ there$ houses$ and$ establishments$ nearby$ the$ construction$site?$Would$construction$involve$activities$generate$loud$noise$such$as$breaking$of$ concrete$ pavements,$ hammering,$ etc?$ Identify$ specific$ measures$ to$ be$ observed$ by$ the$ contractor$in$the$EMP$such$as$avoiding$such$activities$during$quiet$periods$of$the$day.$$ (c)$ Proper% handling% of% construction% wastes$ –$ Temporary$ waste$ disposal$ facilities$ must$ be$ provided$to$minimize$the$amount$site$litter,$and$assurances$should$be$made$by$the$LGU$that$ these$ wastes$ will$ be$ collected$ and$ properly$ disposed$ of$ in$ accordance$ with$ government$ regulations.$ (d)$ Safety$ –$ Safety$ of$ workers$ and$ the$ public$ must$ be$ given$ priority.$ $ Standard$ construction$ safety$protocols$must$be$observed.$ $ II.)Preparation)of)the)Environmental)and)Social)Management/Mitigation)Plan)(ESMP))based) on)the)Assessments) 1.$ The$ ESMP$ should$ include$ both$ environmental$ and$ social$ management$ measures$ and$ it$ should$be$based$on$the$results$of$the$Social$and$Environmental$Assessments$in$the$FS$as$well$as$ technical$ information$ about$ the$ proposed$ subproject$ (i.e.$ the$ type,$ scale$ and$ extent$ of$ the$ subproject,$ the$ planned$ alignment$ of$ roads,$ the$ structures$ to$ be$ built,$ etc.$ or$ initial/draft$ engineering$ design$ if$ already$ available).$ This$ means$ that$ the$ impacts$ and$ the$ measures$ identified$ in$ the$ EMP$ should$ be$ consistent$ with$ the$ findings$ of$ the$ Social$ and$ Environmental$ Assessments$and$with$the$subproject$type,$scale$and$design.$ 2.$ To$ facilitate$ the$ preparation$ of$ the$ EMPs,$ templates$ have$ been$ prepared$ for$ the$ most$ common$subprojects$namely,$Farm$to$Market$Roads,$Communal$Irrigation$and$Potable$Water$ Supply.$ 3.$ Note$ that$ measures$ identified$ in$ the$ ESMP$ should$ be$ reflected$ in$ the$ relevant$ subproject$ documents$(i.e.$the$Contract,$the$DED$and/or$the$POW).$Measures$that$are$part$of$the$social$ safeguard$ aspect$ (e.g.$ acquisition$ of$ rightLofLway,$ crop/property$ damage$ compensation,$ IP$ endorsements,$etc.)$should$be$reflected$in$the$corresponding$social$safeguards$documents$(e.g.$ deed$ of$ donations,$ survey$ of$ entitlements,$ survey$ of$ project$ affected$ persons,$ resettlement$ plan,$IP$Plan,$etc.)$Measures$that$are$the$responsibility$of$the$contractor$should$be$included$as$ part$ of$ the$ Contract.$ These$ include$ mandatory$ repair/restoration$ of$ any$ damage$ to$ existing$ road$ or$ other$ public$ structure$ due$ to$ heavy$ equipment$ traffic,$ or$ due$ to$ other$ construction$ activities$ during$ construction,$ properly$ handing$ of$ construction$ waste,$ provision$ of$ toilet$ facilities$ and$ safety$ measures$ during$ construction.$ Measures$ that$ have$ something$ to$ do$ with$ the$subproject’s$design$should$be$reflected$in$the$DED,$while$those$that$have$something$to$do$ additional$work$should$be$reflected$in$the$Program$of$Work.$Measures$that$are$applied$as$part$ of$ the$ maintenance$ and$ operation$ of$ the$ subproject$ should$ be$ indicated$ as$ such$ in$ the$ EMP.$ These$include$measures$that$require$introduction$of$new$technologies$in$the$influence$areas$by$ the$DA.$Otherwise,$those$ESMP$measures$that$cannot$be$funded$within$the$present$subproject$ budget$ should$ automatically$ be$ part$ of$ the$ commitment$ of$ the$ LGU/community$ as$ part$ of$ future$subproject$enhancement.$$ % % % Annex%D%% % Guidance)for)Reviewing)the)Safeguards)Aspect)of)PRDP)Subprojects) $ 1.$ In$ reviewing$ the$ subprojects,$ the$ reviewer$ should$ look$ at$ the$ entire$ subproject$ proposal$ package.$The$reviewer$should$use$the$form/template$below.$The$reviewer$should$review$the$FS,$ the$draft$contract,$the$DED$and$POW$along$with$all$the$safeguards$documents,$and$determine$if$ they$ are$ consistent$ and$ adequate.$ The$ reviewer$ should$ check$ the$ submitted$ documents$ and$ information$against$the$IP$Policy$Framework,$the$LARRPF$and$the$Environmental$Management$ Framework.$However,$the$reviewer$may$focus$on$the$following$critical$issues:$ $ For$any$Subproject:$ 1) Project$site$does$not$encroach$into$protected$areas$or$displace$cultural$heritage$ properties;$ 2) Presence$of$IP$communities$and$if$there$are,$whether$the$subprojects$has$complied$with$ the$requirements$of$the$IP$Policy$Framework;$ 3) ROW$acquisition$–$What$is$the$status$of$ROW$acquisition.$Are$the$ROW$documents$ presented$sufficient$to$cover$the$land/row$requirements$of$the$subproject?$ 4) Displaced$houses/structures$and/or$land,$crop/property$damage$and$how$they$were$or$ planned$to$be$compensated;$If$there$are$displaced$homes$or$economically$displaced$ households,$whether$a$resettlement$plan$have$been$prepared$following$the$LARRPF.$$ 5) Consistency$of$the$subprojects$location,$design$and$implementation$plan$with$the$ Technical$Environmental$Guidelines$(Annex$B)$ $ For$FMR,$all$of$(1)$–$(5)$above$plus$the$following:$ • Adequacy$of$slope$stabilization$measures$$ • Adequacy$of$drainage$and/or$potential$flooding$issues$and$how$they$were$addressed$ • Potential$road$safety$issues$and$how$they$were$addressed$and$planned$to$be$addressed$ $ For$Communal$Irrigation$Subprojects,$all$of$(1)$to$(5)$above$plus$the$following:$ • Presence$ of$ schistosomiasis,$ malaria$ or$ mosquito$ breeding$ grounds$ and$ control$ measures$applied$or$planned$to$be$applied;$ • Any$dam$should$not$be$more$than$10$meters$in$height$and$they$should$be$designed$by$ qualified$ engineers.$ $ The$ reviewer$ shall$ also$ check$ whether$ the$ Environmental$ and$ Social$Assessment$in$the$FS$included$any$risk$assessment$of$possible$dam/embankment$ breaches$or$failure$and$whether$a$dam$safety$plan$has$been$submitted.$$ $ For$Potable$Water$Supply$Subprojects,$all$of$(1)L(5)$above$plus$the$following:$ • Presence$of$septic$tanks$or$garbage$disposal$site$within$50$meter$radius$ • Whether$the$source$of$water$passed$a$potability$test$ $ $ $ For$NRM$Subprojects,$all$of$(1)$to$(5)$above$plus:$ $ • Potential$elite$capture$of$the$subproject.$The$reviewer$shall$look$into$the$beneficiary$ organization$whether$they$are$really$the$ones$traditionally$occupying$the$areas$where$ interventions/investment$will$be$implemented.$ • Potential$exclusion$of$other$members$of$the$community$to$the$beneficiary/partner$ organization’s$membership$or$to$the$subproject$benefits$due$to$socioLeconomic$class,$ ethnicity$and$gender$affiliations$ • Potential$restriction$of$access$to$some$members$of$the$community$to$their$traditional$ sources$of$livelihood$such$as$fishing$grounds,$forest$and$kaingin$farms.$ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Annex%E%% % ANNEX%E%7%1.%% % Mindanao)Rural)Development)Project)–)Adaptable)Loan)Program)II) Environmental)and)Social)Management)Plan)Template)for)Rural/FarmLtoLMarket)Roads) % [Note:% % This% template% is% designed% to% rapidly% identify% and% assess% the% environmental% issues% and% associated%mitigation/management%measures%in%Rural%and%Farm?to?Market%Roads%funded%under% MRDP2.%This%template%consolidates%all%safeguards%aspect%of%Communal%Irrigation%Subproject%as% found% in% various% project% documents.% This% document% replaces% the% EMP% checklist% in% Annex% 38% of% the%RI%Manual]% % Name)of)Road:) ___________________________________________________________) Location:) ) ___________________________________________________________) Implementing)LGU:) ___________________________________________________________) Estimated)number)of)beneficiaries:) _______________________________________________) New)or)Rehab:) ___________________________________________________________) Estimated)Total)Cost:)___________________________________________________________) ) A.)Site)and)Design)Consideration) [Do%not%proceed%with%the%Subproject%preparation%including%this%ESMP%unless%all%items%below%are% confirmed%true.]$ 1. The$Road$does$not$encroach$into$or$traverse$any$declared$protected$area$of$natural$ habitat$(c.f.%Loan%Agreement:%MRDP2%will%not%fund%subprojects%located%inside%a%declared% Protected%Area);$ 2. The$subproject$will$not$displace,$disfigure$or$render$inoperable/inaccessible$any$ monument$or$physical$structure$of$known$cultural$and$historical$significance.$ $ B.) Environmental) Issues) and) Mitigation) Measures$ [The% following% are% issues% frequently% associated% with% Farm% to% Market% Roads.% Issues% include% alleged/perceived% impacts,% potential% impacts,%health%and%safety%and%environmental%risks.%Entries%in%the%“Assessmentâ€?%column%should% describe% or% provide% qualifications% regarding% the% significance% of% the% issues.% Issues% that% are% deemed% critical% or% significant% should% have% a% corresponding% entry% in% the% “Mitigationâ€?% column.% Entries% in% the% “Instrumentâ€?% column% should% indicate% how% and% where% in% the% measures% will% be% implemented%in%the%Subproject.%Please%feel%free%to%add,%delete%or%modify%any%of%the%items%in%the% template.%In%preparing%the%EMP%below%refer%to%the%Environmental%and%Social%Assessment%Section% of%the%FS%for%specific%safeguards%issues%and%assessments]$$ $ $ $ $ Issue)(Potential) Assessment)(Sample) Mitigation)Measure) Instrument)of) Impact)) assessments)) Implementation) (POW,)Contract,)IDP,)) or)O&M)Plan)*) 1.$Temporary$increase$ [$$]$Topography$of$the$ [$]$Earthmoving/$$cutting$ DED/POW;$ in$sedimentation$during$ road$alignment$ of$slopes$to$be$done$ Contract$ construction$ necessitate$massive$ during$dry$months$ earthmoving$and$cutting$ [$]$Proper$disposal$and$ of$clayey$or$loose$topsoil$ compaction$of$spoils$ [$$]$Cut$materials$will$ [$]$No$measures$ consist$mainly$of$hard$ required$ rocks$and$are$unlikely$to$ generate$significant$ sediments$$ 2.$Potential$ [$$]$Waste$oil$and$grease$ [$$]$Proper$handling$and$ Contract$ contamination$of$ from$equipment$could$ disposal$of$waste$oil$and$ surface$and$ contaminate$surface$ grease$ groundwater$with$ water$ oil/grease$ [$$]$There$will$be$no$or$ insignificant$amount$of$ waste$oil/grease$ 3.$Potential$ [$$]$Construction$workers$ [$$]$Set$up$adequate$ Contract$ contamination$with$ would$be$temporarily$ latrine/toilet$facility$at$ human$waste$ housed$in$a$base$camp$$ the$base$camp$ [$]$Workers$would$be$ mostly$locals$and$are$ expected$to$go$home$to$ their$respective$houses$ after$works$ 4.$Potential$disruption$ [$]$The$access$road$and/or$ [$]$Keep$the$road$open$ Contract$ of$traffic$flow$$ segments$to$be$ to$traffic$flow$and$ rehabilitated$need$is$vital$ minimize$disruptions$ to$daily$activities$of$the$ along$the$access$road$ residents$and$farmers$and$ and/or$construction$ need$to$be$kept$open$to$ area;$Provide$adequate$ traffic$during$construction$ warning$signs$and$traffic$ [$]$The$construction$will$ personnel$when$ not$affect$daily$ necessary;$ movement$of$residents$ [$]$Undertake$regular$ and$farmers$ maintenance$measures$ on$the$passable$ portions$of$the$roads$ [$]$No$measures$needed$ 5.$Potential$dust/mud$ Roads$could$become$ [$]$Undertake$sprinkling$ Contract$ Issue)(Potential) Assessment)(Sample) Mitigation)Measure) Instrument)of) Impact)) assessments)) Implementation) (POW,)Contract,)IDP,)) or)O&M)Plan)*) nuisance$during$ powdery$during$dry$days$ of$road$(including$ construction$ and$muddy$during$rainy$ access$roads)$during$dry$ days$of$the$construction$ days,$and$filling$up$of$ period$ potholes$during$rainy$ [$]$Access$road$and/or$the$ days,$especially$in$ construction/$ residential$areas$ rehabilitation$works$ [$]Set$up$speed$limits$for$ passes$through$a$ vehicles,$especially$ populated$area$ within$residential$areas$ [$]$Access$road$and/or$ $ construction/$ [$]$No$measures$needed$ rehabilitation$does$not$ pass$through$any$ populated$area$$ 6.$Landslide/$erosion$of$ [$]$The$road$will$traverse$a$ [$]$Include$slope$ DED/POW$ exposed$road$sides$ mountainous$area$ protection$works$at$the$ $ resulting$in$ necessitating$deep$cuts$ following$stations:$$ Or$(if$budget$does$ sedimentation$of$ on$mountainsides,$ $_____$ not$permit)$ waterways$$ particularly$between$ ______$ LGU$Commitment$ station$____$and$____,$ $ Letter$ etc$(check$DED$for$deep$ ..etc..$ cuts)…$$ (Specify$the$type/s$of$ [$]$The$exposed$slopes$will$ slope$protection$to$be$ likely$consist$of$highly$ applied$at$each$sectionL$ erodible$loose$materials$$ Consult$with$the$ [$]$The$cut$slopes$will$be$ Municipal$Engineer:$$ hard$materials$that$would$ [$]$Bioengineering$with$ resist$erosion$ geomat$and$cover$crop$ [$]$The$road$passes$ [$]$Fast$growing$shrub$ through$a$relatively$ species$ benign$terrain,$cuts$will$ [$]$Riprap$ be$minimal$ [$]$Gabions$ [$]$The$rehabilitation$work$ [$]$Terracing$ does$not$involve$ [$]$Concrete$protection$ additional$road$cuts$ wall$ [$]$Others$_______)$ $ 7.$Inadequate$drainage$ [$]$The$road$will$block$ [$]$Installation$of$cross$ DED$ resulting$in$flooding$or$ runoff,$resulting$in$ drain$between$station$ ponding$$ flooding$on$one$side$of$ ____$and$_____.$ the$road$during$rainy$ Issue)(Potential) Assessment)(Sample) Mitigation)Measure) Instrument)of) Impact)) assessments)) Implementation) (POW,)Contract,)IDP,)) or)O&M)Plan)*) days.$ [$]$Drainage$issues$ unlikely$ 8.$Potential$increase$ [$$]$There$is$an$ongoing$ [$]$DA$to$continue$to$ Capacity$Building$ use$of$pesticides$due$to$ IPM$program$of$DA$in$the$ support$IPM$program$$ Plan$ intensification$of$cash$ service$area$ [$]$LGU$to$Coordinate$ O&M$Plan;$$ crop$production$in$the$ [$$]$Farmers$in$the$service$ with$DA$on$IPM$training$ Capacity$Building$ area$ area$have$not$been$ Plan$ trained$on$IPM$ 9.$Potential$ [$]$The$proposed$road$will$ [$]$DA$to$coordinate$$ O&M$Plan;$ acceleration$of$ connect$to$the$market$an$ with$LGU$for$the$ Capacity$Building$ denudation$of$the$ upland/hilly$area$where$ introduction$of$ Plan$ upland/hilly$areas$due$ farmers$are$currently$ sustainable$upland$ to$intensification$of$ practicing$erosive$farming$ farming$systems$in$the$ crop$production$ techniques.$The$road$ area$ could$help$accelerate$the$ $ denudation$of$the$ [$]$No$measure$required$ upland/hillsides$rendering$ them$unproductive$in$a$ few$years.$ [$]$The$road$connects$only$ lowland$farms$to$the$ market$ 10.$Potential$increased$ [$]$The$proposed$road$will$ [$]$Coordinate$with$ O&M$Plan;$Capacity$ in$encroachments$of$ improve$human$access$to$ DENR$for$the$enactment$ Building$Plan$ human$activities$into$ the$nearby$public$forest,$ of$ordinance$deputizing$ the$nearby$public$forest$ resulting$in$increase$slash$ the$local$community$to$ and$burn$cultivation,$ enforce$forestry$laws$ illegal$logging$and$ [$]$No$measure$$required$ poaching.$ [$]$The$proposed$road$ does$not$improve$access$ to$a$public$forest$ 10.$Local$employment$ [$$]$Construction$will$ [$]$Hiring$priority$shall$ Contract$ provide$local$employment$ be$given$to$qualified$ opportunities$ local$residents;$ Implement$RI$Manual$ on$local$hiring$ $ [$$]$Construction$does$not$ [$]$No$measures$ $ provide$any$local$ required$ Issue)(Potential) Assessment)(Sample) Mitigation)Measure) Instrument)of) Impact)) assessments)) Implementation) (POW,)Contract,)IDP,)) or)O&M)Plan)*) employment$ opportunities$ .$ $ $ $ $ $ Prepared$by:$$ ___________________________$ $ Adopted$by$MPMIU:$ $ $ _________________________________$ $ MPMIU$Head$ $ Noted$by$the$local$community:$ $ $ $ _________________________________$ $ Barangay$Captain$ $ Endorsed$By$:$ $ $ $ ______________________________$ $ Municipal$Mayor! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ANNEX%E%7%2.%% % Mindanao)Rural)Development)Project)–)Adaptable)Loan)Program)II) Environmental)and)Social)Management)Plan)Template)for)Potable)Water)Supply)Subprojects) [Note:% This% template% is% designed% to% rapidly% identify% and% assess% the% environmental% issues% and% associated% mitigation/management% measures% in% Potable% Water% Sub?projects% funded% under% MRDP?APL2.% This% template% consolidates% all% safeguards% aspect% of% Potable% Water% Supply% Sub? projects% as% found% in% various% project% documents.% This% document% replaces% the% EMP% checklist% in% Annex%39%of%the%RI%Manual.]% ) Backgrounder) –) One$of$the$lessons$learned$in$the$implementation$rural$potable$water$supply$ programs$ by$ the$ national$ government$ agencies$ is$ that$ a$ large$ number$ of$ the$ potable$ water$ wells$previously$constructed$by$government$agencies$in$the$villages$have$been$abandoned$or$ are$ nonLoperational,$ due$ to,$ among$ others,$ water$ quality$ problems,$ such$ as$ coliform$ contamination,$salt$water$intrusion,$high$iron$and$manganese$content,$are$often$encountered$ especially$in$shallow$wells$resulting$in$the$abandonment$of$these$wells$(c.f.%RI%Annex,%Section%I.% Subsection%C.%item%2.)$ $ Name)of)PWS)Subproject:) _____________________________________________) Location:) ) ) _____________________________________________) Level)I)or)Level)II) ) _____________________________________________) New)or)Rehab)) ) _____________________________________________) Implementing)LGU:) ) _____________________________________________) Number)of)Households:) _____________________________________________) Estimated)total)Subproject)Cost:) _______________________________________) $ $ A.)Site)and)Design)Consideration) [Do%not%proceed%with%the%Subproject%preparation%including%this%ESMP%unless%all%items%below%are% confirmed%true.]$ 1. The$PWS$involves$either:$(a)$provision$of$Level$I$water$system;$(b)$construction$of$Level$II$ water$system;$or$(c)$rehabilitation$of$existing$Level$II$water$system$(c.f.%RI%Manual,%page% 24).$ 2. The$water$source$is$not$inside$a$declared$protected$area$of$natural$habitat$(c.f.%Loan% Agreement:%MRDP2%will%not%fund%subprojects%located%inside%a%declared%Protected%Area);$ 3. The$water$source$is$at$least$25$meters$away$from$any$septic$tank$or$any$raw$wastewater$ discharges$(c.f.%Code%of%Sanitation%of%the%Philippines);$ 4. Either$of$the$following$is$true:$$ o There$is$no$prior$evidence/s$(anecdotal$or$otherwise)$indicating$nonLpotability$of$$ the$water$(such$as$high$coliform,$salinity,$elevated$iron$or$manganese,$etc.)$$at$ the$proposed$water$source;$or,$$ o Or,$if$there$is/are$such$evidence/s,$appropriate$preliminary$potability$test/s$ conducted$on$the$water$has/have$disproved$it/them;$or,$$$ o Or,$if$there$is$evidence$that$has$not$been$disproved$by$potability$test,$said$water$ quality$problem$can$be$adequately$addressed$by$the$appropriate$and$acceptable$ design/technology$which$will$be$part$of$the$proposed$potable$water$supply$ system;$and,$ 5. The$subproject$will$not$displace,$disfigure$or$render$inoperable/inaccessible$any$ monument$or$physical$structure$of$known$cultural$and$historical$significance.$ $ C.)Environmental)and)Social)Management)Plan)(ESMP)) (The% following% are% issues% frequently% associated% with% water% supply% system.% Issues% include% alleged/perceived%impacts,%potential%impacts,%health%and%safety%and%environmental%risks.%Entries% in%the%“Assessmentâ€?%column%should%describe%or%provide%qualifications%regarding%the%significance% of%the%issues.%Issues%that%are%deemed%critical%or%significant%should%have%a%corresponding%entry%in% the%“Mitigationâ€?%column.%Entries%in%the%“Instrumentâ€?%column%should%indicate%how%and%where%in% the% measures%will%be%implemented%in%the%Subproject.%Please%feel%free%to%add,%delete%or%modify% any% of% the% items%in%the%template.%In%preparing%the%EMP%below%refer%to%the%Environmental% and% Social%Assessment%Section%of%the%FS%for%specific%safeguards%issues%and%assessments.)% $ $ Issue) Assessment) Mitigation/Management) Measure) Instrument)(Where) this)will)be) addressed)1- 1.$Excessive$water$ Water$abstraction$is$ [$]$Redesign$the$PWS$ [$]$DED/POW$ abstraction$possibly$ ____lps$while$capacity$is$ based$on$feasible$rate$of$ [$]$Preparation$ resulting$in:$$$ ____lps.$This$$ water$abstraction$given$ (must$submit$NWRB$ $ constitutes:$ information$on$the$ clearance$as$part$of$ $ [$]$a$small$percentage$of$ sustainable$capacity$of$ the$procurement$ the$capacity$of$the$ the$source$or$find$another$ docs.)$ water$source.$$ source;$ $ [$]$a$significant$ [$]$Secure$NWRB$ percentage$of$the$ clearance/water$permit;$$ capacity$of$the$water$ source$but$there$are$no$ existing$competing$ water$uses$or$no$critical$ aquatic$ecosystems$to$ be$affected$ downstream.$$ [$]$Disruption$or$ [$]$Abstraction$rate$is$a$ [$]$Reduce/limit$water$ [$]$O&M$Plan$ deprivation$of$ significant$percentage$of$ abstraction$rate$to$____$ [$]$Capacity$Building$ existing$water$uses;$ water$source$capacity$ lps;$$ of$BAWASA$ $$or,$$ and$could$reduce$ [$]$Include$existing$ availability$of$water$for$ uses/users$in$the$ existing$uses$such$as$ proposed$water$system;$ __________(describe$ [$]$Redesign$PWS$or$find$ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1!(DED/POW,!RAP,!IP!Plan,!O&M!Plan,!Capacity!Building!Plan)! Issue) Assessment) Mitigation/Management) Measure) Instrument)(Where) this)will)be) addressed)1- existing$uses$likely$to$be$ other$source;$ affected);$ [$]$ecological$ [$]$a$significant$ [$]$Limit$rate$of$extraction$ [$]$O&M$Plan$$ damage;$ percentage$and$could$ such$that$aquatic$ [$]Capacity$Building$ cause$a$nearby$aquatic$ ecosystem$is$maintained,$ of$BAWASA$ or$wetland$ecosystem$to$ esp.$during$dry$season;$ dry$up$and$the$ $ ecosystem$is$critical$for$ [$]$No$measure$required$ the$survival$of$any$ important$species;$ [$]$affected$aquatic$or$ wetland$ecosystem$is$ not$critical.$ [$]$$saltwater$ [$]$rate$of$groundwater$ [$]$Reduce$or$limit$water$ [$]$O&M$and$$ intrusion$into$ extraction$could$ extraction$rate$during$dry$ [$]Capacity$Building$ groundwater$;$ cause/worsen$existing$ season$ of$BAWASA$ saltwater$intrusion$in$ $ the$aquifer;$ [$]$No$measure$required$ [$]$groundwater$source$ is$far$from$the$coast$or$ saltwater$intrusion$is$ unlikely$in$the$area;$$ $ 2.$Water$at$source$ [$]$Historical/anecdotal/$ [$]$Conduct$standard$ [$]$Certificate$of$ allegedly$not$ ocular$evidence$of$bad$ potability$(coliform)$test$ Potability$and$ potable$or$water$ water$quality$ plus$additional$tests$for$ favorable$test$ unsuitable$for$ $ suspect$contaminants:$$ results$submitted$as$ drinking$ [$]$Source$is$within$ $ part$of$the$ highly$mineralized$area$ [$]$Arsenic$ procurement$ such$as$mining$site$and$ [$]$Mercury$ package$(For$ geothermal$area,$and/or$ [$]$Lead$ Drinking$Water$ potentially$ [$]$Iron$ Standards$refer$to$ contaminated$sites$such$ [$]$Magnesium$ DOH$Admin$Order$ as$areas$within$or$near$ [$]$Cadmium$ No.2007L0012).$ former$or$existing$ [$]$Others$_________$ Otherwise,$ chemical$factories,$ $ adequate$treatment$ recycling$plants.$$ before$finalizing$ system$should$be$ $ DED/POW;$ incorporated$in$the$ [$]$Presence$of$ $ project$design$and$ abandoned$wells$due$to$ [$]$Otherwise$look$for$ reflected$in$the$ alleged$heavy$metal$ another$source$ POW/DED.$ Issue) Assessment) Mitigation/Management) Measure) Instrument)(Where) this)will)be) addressed)1- concentration$(mercury,$ arsenic,$etc.),$taste,$ color,$etc.$ $ [$]$There$is$no$evidence$ [$]$Conduct$standard$ [$]$If$test$indicate$ of$poor$water$quality$ potability$(coliform)$test$ presence$of$ and$site$inspections$ before$operation$of$PWS;$$ coliform,$LGU$to$ indicate$good$water$ install$adequate$ quality$from$the$ treatment$before$ proposed$source.$ operation$of$PWS;$$ $ [$]$Expansion$of$existing$ [$]$No$measure$required$ $ water$source$used$for$ drinking;$ 3.$Ownership$issue$ [$]$Land$is$privately$own$$ [$]$Negotiate$with$ Submit$to$PSO$deed$ of$site$of$water$ [$]$Water$source$ landowner$for$the$ of$sale$or$deed$of$ source$ structure/s$will$displace$ acquisition$of$sites$for$the$ donation$as$part$of$ some$standing$crops$ water$source$structures$ procurement$ through$negotiation$(e.g.$ package$for$“no$ by$purchase,$or$by$ objectionâ€?$ donation,$quit$claim.)$ $ [$]$Site$is$public$land$ [$]$Secure$Special$Land$ $ Use$Permit$from$DENR$ [$]$Acquire$ROW$through$ other$means$_______$ (specify)$ 4.$Potential$ROW$ [$]$Lands$to$be$traversed$ [$]$Secure$Quit$Claims$ Submit$to$PSO$social$ conflicts$for$the$ by$the$pipelines$are$ from$owners$of$lands$ safeguards$ distribution$pipes$ privately$owned$$ along$the$pipeline$routes$ documents$as$part$ and$communal$ $ and$communal$faucet$ of$procurement$ faucet$sites$$ [$]$Potential$damage$ sites$ package$for$the$“no$ to/displacement$of$ $ objectionâ€?;$ properties/structures$ [$]$Prepare$compensation$ Implement$the$ along$the$pipeline$ plans,$through$ compensation$plans$ routes$ consultations/negotiation at$least$a$month$ s$with$owners$of$affected$ prior$to$start$of$ properties$$ construction$works$ $ 5.$Potential$violation$ [$]$Some$structures/$ [$]$Secure$FPIC$ [$]$FPIC/CP$to$be$ of$Indigenous$ activities$of$the$ $ submitted$as$part$of$ Peoples$rights$ subproject$are$located$ [$]$Relocate$PWS$ the$procurement$ inside$any$or$some$IP$ structures/activities$ package$ ancestral$domains,$or$ outside$IP$lands$or$to$ requirements$ Issue) Assessment) Mitigation/Management) Measure) Instrument)(Where) this)will)be) addressed)1- will$affect$any$or$some$ areas$where$they$will$not$ $$ extant$IP$communities$ affect$IP$communities$ [$]$DED$ who$are$not$themselves$ $ beneficiaries$of$PWS.$ Identify$the$affected$IPs:$ _______________.$ $ $ [$]$The$IPs$are$ [$]$Ensure$IPs$were$ Submit$minutes$of$ themselves$beneficiaries$ consulted$and$have$given$ meetings$/$ of$the$PWS.$Identify$the$ consent$for$the$PWS,$by$ consultations$and$ IPs:$ providing$documentary$ Certificate$of$ _________________$ evidence$of$consultations$ Consent$to$PSO$as$ conducted$and$securing$ part$of$the$ Certificate$of$Consent$ procurement$ from$the$local$tribal$ package$ council$$ $ [$]$The$subproject$(water$ [$]$No$measure$required$ $ source$and$pipeline)$is$ outside$the$any$IP$ ancestral$domain$and$ will$not$affect$any$ extant$IP$community.$ 6.$Potential$ [$]$Construction$will$ [$]$Include$slope$ DED/POW$ sedimentation$of$ include$clearing$and$ protection/stabilization$ creeks/water$ leveling/$excavation$of$ works$on$exposed$loose$ channels$from$the$ sloping$lands$involving$ soils$and$cuts.$Describe$ construction$ significant$amount$of$ the$slope$protection$to$be$ excavations$/$spoils$ excavated$spoils$ employed:$___________$ $ ___________________$ $ [$]$Include$restoration$ works$such$as$spreading$ out$piles$of$spoils$and$ boulders,$reLvegetation$ and/or$landscaping$of$ exposed$areas$at$ construction$site.$ $ [$]$Construction$works$ [$]$No$measure$required$ $ entail$very$minimal$or$no$ excavation$ Issue) Assessment) Mitigation/Management) Measure) Instrument)(Where) this)will)be) addressed)1- 7.$Potential$damage$ [$]$Presence$of$physical$ [$]$Relocate$water$ [$]$DED$ to$physical$cultural$ cultural$property$(e.g.$ box/faucet$area$and/or$ $ property$ monuments,$structures,$ reroute$pipeline$if$ $ $ archeological$sites,$etc.)$ possible;$$ $ along$the$pipeline$ If$not,$$ $ routes$and$near$ [$]$Observe$reporting$and$ [$]$Reporting$ communal$faucets.$ conservation$protocols$ protocol$included$in$ based$on$prior$ the$Contract$ coordination$with$the$ National$Historical$ Institute$and$National$ Museum.$$ 8.$Potential$drainage$ [$]$Some$communal$ [$]$All$communal$faucet$ [$]$POW/DED$ issues$at$communal$ faucets$or$water$ outfalls/water$collection$ faucets$resulting$in$ collection$points$are$ points$are$provided$with$ the$formation$of$ located$in:$ concrete$platforms$and$ permanent$pools$of$ [$]$clayey$soils$or$soils$ drainage$canals$ water$and$muddy$ that$can$easily$become$ $ soil$near$the$faucets$$$ muddy$ $ [$]$lowLlying$areas$that$ could$easily$become$ waterlogged$ $ [$]$All$communal$faucets$ [$]$No$measure$required$ $ or$water$collection$ points$are$located$in$ sandy,$well$drained$areas$ 9.$Human$activities$ [$]$There$is$a$possibility$of$ [$]$Strictly$implement$ O&M$Plan;$ in$the$PWS$source$ increase$in$human$ Sanitation$Code$of$the$ BAWASA$Capacity$ site$$$ activities$near$and$within$ Philippines$such$as$ Building$Plan$ the$PWS$water$source$ prohibition$of$ due$to$improved$access$ washing/bathing$activities$ and$site$development$ within$25$meters$from$the$ $ source$ $ $ $ [$]$The$PWS$source$is$ No$measure$required$ $ located$far$away$from$ human$settlements$and$ activities$$$ 10.$Potential$lack$of$ [$]$There$are$existing$ [$]$Regular$cleaning$of$the$ O&M$Plan;$ good$housekeeping$ bathing$and$washing$ water$source$(tank/box$ BAWAS$Capacity$ of$the$water$source$ activities$near$or$at$the$ and$vicinities),$and$the$ Building$Plan$ Issue) Assessment) Mitigation/Management) Measure) Instrument)(Where) this)will)be) addressed)1- and$the$communal$ water$source$site$(for$ communal$faucet/box$ faucets/collection$ springLbased$PWS)$or$at$ sites$and$vicinities;$ point$sites$ the$well$sites$(for$ $ artesian$wells)$ $ [$]$Communal$ faucets/box$sites$(for$ Level$II$PWS)$could$ become$cluttered$and$ strewn$with$garbage$and$ discarded$bottles,$ packages$ 11.$Potential$ [$]$Water$could$become$ [$]$Regular$sampling$and$ O&M$Plan;$ changes$in$water$ contaminated$with$new$ potability$tests$conducted$ BAWAS$Capacity$ quality$due$to$new$ pollution$sources$from$ as$required$under$DOH$ Building$Plan$ pollution$sources$ human$activities$ Admin$Order$No.$2007L 0012$ $ Prepared$by: $ $ $ ___________________________________________$ $ Adopted$by$the$MRDP2$Municipal$Project$Implementing$Unit:$ $ $ $ ___________________________________________$ ! ! Head!of!the!MPMIU! $ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % ANNEX%%E73%% % Mindanao)Rural)Development)Project)–)Adaptable)Loan)Program)II) Environmental)and)Social)Management)Plan)Template)for)Irrigation)Subprojects) % [Note:% % This% template% is% designed% to% rapidly% identify% and% assess% the% environmental% issues% and% associated% mitigation/management% measures% in% Irrigation% Sub?projects% funded% under% MRDP2.% This%template%consolidates%all%safeguards%aspect%of%Communal%Irrigation%Subproject%as%found%in% various% project% documents.% This% document% replaces% the% EMP% checklist% in% Annex% 38% of% the% RI% Manual]% Name)of)Irrigation)System:) _______________________________________________) Location:) ___________________________________________________________) Implementing)LGU:) _____________________________________________________) Number)of)hectares)of)service)area:)___________________________________) Type:) _______)SWIP)_________RunLofLRiver) ________Pump) New)or)Rehab:) _____________________________________________________) Estimated)Total)Cost:)_______________________________________________) $ A.)Site)and)Design)Consideration) $ [Do%not%proceed%with%the%Subproject%preparation%including%this%ESMP%unless%all%items%below%are% confirmed%true.]$ $ 1. None$of$the$subproject$structures$is$located$inside$a$declared$protected$area$of$natural$ habitat$(c.f.%Loan%Agreement:%MRDP2%will%not%fund%subprojects%located%inside%a%declared% Protected%Area);$ 2. In$case$of$runLofLthe$river$system,$there$are$no$ongoing$sand/gravel$quarrying$within$ 500$meters$upstream$and$1$km$downstream$of$the$diversion$points.$Otherwise,$the$LGU$ has$signified$that$all$quarrying$activities$within$the$said$stretch$shall$be$stopped$once$ the$construction$has$started$and$that$no$quarrying$permits$shall$be$issued$in$the$future.$ 3. The$subproject$will$not$displace,$disfigure$or$render$inoperable/inaccessible$any$ monument$or$physical$structure$of$known$cultural$and$historical$significance.$ 4. For$new$construction:$the$source$or$water$shall$meet$the$quality$standard$for$irrigation,$ i.e.,$minimum$silt$content$and$absence$of$waterLborne$diseases$(schistosomiasis,$ malaria,$etc.);$damage/disturbance$to$ecologically$significant$flora$and$fauna$shall$be$ minimal;$and$intake$point$or$diversion$shall$be$outside$protected$areas$or$critical$ watersheds;$ ) B.) Environmental) Issues) and) Mitigation) Measures$ [The% following% are% issues% frequently% associated% with% Communal% Irrigation% Systems.% Issues% include% alleged/perceived% impacts,% potential% impacts,% health% and% safety% and% environmental% risks.% Entries% in% the% “Assessmentâ€?% column%should%describe%or%provide%qualifications%regarding%the%significance%of%the%issues.%Issues% that% are% deemed% critical% or% significant% should% have% a% corresponding% entry% in% the% “Mitigationâ€?% column.%Entries%in%the%“Instrumentâ€?%column%should%indicate%how%and%where%in%the%measures%will% be%implemented%in%the%Subproject.%Please%feel%free%to%add,%delete%or%modify%any%of%the%items%in% the% template.% In% preparing% the% EMP% below% refer% to% the% Environmental% and% Social% Assessment% Section%of%the%FS%for%specific%safeguards%issues%and%assessments.]$$ $ Issue)(Potential) Assessment)(Sample) Mitigation)Measure) Instrument)of) Impact)) assessments)) Implementation) (POW,)Contract,)IDP,)) or)O&M)Plan)*) *1.Schistosomiasis$ [$$]$The$vector$snail$ IMO*$and$IA$to$coordinate$ O&M$Plan$ (Oncomelania$sp.)$is$not$ with$the$DOH$and$the$LGU$in$ present$in$the$area$but$ instituting$a$system$of$ there$is$a$risk$that$the$ screening$planting$materials,$ species$may$be$ soils$from$endemic$areas.$ introduced$in$the$area.$ $ [$$]$The$vector$snail$is$ Screening$of$animals$and$ O&M$Plan$ endemic$but$there$is$no$ people$from$infected$areas$ reported$case$of$ Improved$sanitation$ infection$$in$the$area$ $ [$$]$The$disease$is$ IMO/IA$to$support$existing$ O&M$Plan$ already$prevalent$in$the$ DOH$program$and$improves$ area.$The$DOH$regularly$ sanitation$ conduct$health$ Information$and$Education$ surveillance$and$ Provision$of$footbridges$ treatment$ $ [$$]$Schistosomiasis$not$ $ $ an$issue.$The$potential$ for$introduction$of$the$ disease$in$the$area$is$ very$low$ *2.$Potential$ [$$]$There$is$an$ongoing$ IMO/IA$to$continue$to$ Capacity$Building$Plan$ increase$use$of$ IPM$program$of$DA$in$ support$the$program$ O&M$Plan$ pesticides$ the$service$area$ $ [$$]$Farmers$in$the$ Coordinate$with$DA$on$IPM$ Capacity$Building$Plan$ service$area$have$not$ training$ O&M$Plan$ been$trained$on$IPM$ *3.$Safety$of$ [$$]$There$were$cases$of$ [$]Enclose$hazardous$areas$ POW$ irrigation$canals$ accidental$drowning$in$ with$fence$or$barriers$ and$intake$areas$ the$area$ [$]Install$warning$signs$ $ [$$]$There$has$been$no$ [$]Enclose$hazardous$areas$ POW$ reported$case$of$ with$fence$or$barriers$ drowning$but$there$are$ [$]Install$warning$signs$ dangerous$areas$in$the$ irrigation$system$ *4.$Domestic$solid$ [$$]$Lack$of$garbage$ [$]Coordinate$with$LGUs$in$ O&M$Plan$ waste$ disposal$system$results$ the$enforcement$of$solid$ Issue)(Potential) Assessment)(Sample) Mitigation)Measure) Instrument)of) Impact)) assessments)) Implementation) (POW,)Contract,)IDP,)) or)O&M)Plan)*) in$the$accumulation$of$ waste$laws$ garbage$in$the$irrigation$ [$]Conduct$regular$walk$ canals$ through$along$the$canal$ system$ $ [$$]$There$is$a$garbage$ [$]Coordinate$with$LGUs$in$ O&M$Plan$ disposal$system$but$is$ the$enforcement$of$solid$ not$implemented$ waste$laws$ [$]Conduct$regular$walk$ through$along$the$canals$$ $ [$$]$There$is$no$garbage$ $ $ problem$in$the$irrigation$ system$ *5.Domestic$ [$$]$Several$households$ Coordinate$with$LGU$in$the$ O&M$Plan$ sewer$and$septage$ and$commercial$ enforcement$of$sanitation$ establishments$dispose$ laws$ of$their$liquid$wastes$ Monitoring$of$canals$ including$septage$into$ the$irrigation$canals$ $ [$$]$There$are$no$ $ $ households$or$ commercial$ establishments$along$ the$irrigation$canals$ 6.$Local$ [$$]$PIDP$interventions$ Hiring$priority$shall$be$given$ Contract$ employment$ provide$local$ to$qualified$local$residents$ employment$ opportunities$ $ [$$]$PIDP$interventions$ $ $ do$not$provide$any$ employment$ opportunities$ *7.$Temporary$ [$$]$Civil$work$activities$ Control$flow$of$sediments$ DED/POW;$ increase$in$ could$increase$ from$civil$works$area$by$ Contract$ sedimentation$ sedimentation$and$ drainage$canals$and$silt$ during$ turbidity$of$water$ traps$ construction$ downstream$of$site$ $ [$$]$Silts/sediments,$ Provide$a$spoil$disposal$area$ DED/POW;$ materials$removed$from$ Contract$ the$canals$could$be$ washed$back$into$the$ Issue)(Potential) Assessment)(Sample) Mitigation)Measure) Instrument)of) Impact)) assessments)) Implementation) (POW,)Contract,)IDP,)) or)O&M)Plan)*) canals$by$runoff$ $ [$$]$There$will$be$no$deL $ $ silting$or$civil$works$ 8.$Potential$ [$$]$Waste$oil$and$grease$ Proper$handling$and$ Contract$ contamination$of$ could$contaminate$ disposal$of$waste$oil$and$ surface$and$ surface$water$ grease$ groundwater$with$ oil/grease$ $ [$$]$There$will$be$no$or$ $ $ insignificant$amount$of$ waste$oil/grease$ 9.$Potential$ [$$]$Significant$number$of$ Set$up$adequate$ Contract$ contamination$ construction$workers$ latrine/toilet$facility$at$ with$human$waste$ construction$sites$ $ [$$]$There$will$be$no$ $ $ construction$workers$ involved$ 10.$Potential$ [$]$Roads$could$become$ [$]Sprinkling$of$roads$during$ Contract$ generation$of$dust$ powdery$during$dry$days$ dry$days$ during$ of$the$construction$ [$]Set$up$speed$limits$for$ construction$ period$ vehicles$ 11.$Possible$ [$]$DeLsilting$activities$ Provide$adequate$space$to$ Contract$ congestion$or$ may$block$off$service$ allow$passage$of$vehicles$ blocking$of$traffic$$ roads$used$by$local$ and$animal$drawn$carts$ residents$ $ $ [$]$Deliveries/hauling$of$ Schedule$deliveries$$during$ Contract$ materials$will$increase$ offLpeak$hours$ vehicular$traffic$ $ [$]$No$impact$on$traffic$ $ $ 12.$Temporary$ [$]$Water$supply$will$be$ Consultation$with$the$ Procurement$Plan;$ disruption$in$ temporarily$suspended$ IAs/affected$farmers$on$the$ POW$schedule;$ water$supply$ during$repair$works$ proper$timing$of$ Contract$ rehabilitation$activities$ $ $ [$]$There$will$be$no$ $ $ interruptions$in$ irrigation$water$supply$ 13.$Canal$ [$]$Canals$are$unlined$ CementLlining$of$canals$ DED/POW$ scouring/onLsite$ and$banks$are$easily$ and/or$provision$of$retaining$ erosion$ scoured/eroded$by$ walls$ Issue)(Potential) Assessment)(Sample) Mitigation)Measure) Instrument)of) Impact)) assessments)) Implementation) (POW,)Contract,)IDP,)) or)O&M)Plan)*) strong$currents$ $ [$]$Use$of$canals$for$ Provide$a$designated$ O&M$ carabaos$to$wallow$ wallowing$area$for$carabaos$ contributes$to$the$ erosion$of$canal$banks$ $ [$]$There$are$no$ $ $ observed$scouring$of$ canals$or$the$canals$are$ cementLlined$ 14.$Systemic$ [$]$High$sedimentation$ [$]Conduct$major$deLsilting$ DED/POW;$ sedimentation$ rate$of$irrigation$canals$ of$the$canal$as$part$of$the$ $O&M$ due$to$heavily$silted$ POW$ water$source$ [$]$Provision$of$settling$ basin/s$ [$]$Regular$deLsilting$of$the$ canals$and$settling$basins$to$ be$done$as$part$of$the$O&M$ $ [$]$Very$low$or$no$ $ $ sedimentation$ 15.Frequent$ [$]$Heavily$silted$canals$ LRegular$deLsilting$and$ DED/POW;$ flooding$ easily$overflows$during$ removal$of$debris$to$be$ O&M$ heavy$rains$$ done$as$part$of$the$O&M$ $ [$]$Waters$from$creeks$ [$]Provision$of$adequate$ DED/POW;$ and$channels$ drainage$canals$and/or$ O&M$ discharging$into$the$ waste$bays$ canals$cause$flooding$ [$]Regular$maintenance$of$ downstream$even$when$ drainage$canals$and/or$ the$intake$is$closed$ waste$bays$ $ [$]$Low$frequency$or$no$ $ $ flooding$reported$ 17.Contamination$ [$]$Excessive$use$of$ L$Promotion$of$the$use$of$ Capacity$Building$Plan$ of$surface$water$ inorganic$fertilizer$and$ IPM$$and$organic$fertilizers$ with$ pesticides$caused$ among$irrigators$association$ agrochemicals$ contamination$of$ members$ surface$and$ground$ waters$ 16.Environmental$ [$]$The$IMO$and$the$IA$ L$Conduct$a$series$of$ Capacity$Building$Plan$ management$ have$low$environmental$ trainings$on$environmental$ capacity$ management$capability$$ management$ $ [$]$The$IMP$and$IA$have$ $ $ Issue)(Potential) Assessment)(Sample) Mitigation)Measure) Instrument)of) Impact)) assessments)) Implementation) (POW,)Contract,)IDP,)) or)O&M)Plan)*) adequate$environmental$ management$capability$ 17.$$Flooding$ [$]$Rise$in$water$level$ []$Construct$dikes$to$protect$ []$DED/POW$ inundation$of$ likely$to$drown$lands$or$ properties$ []$RAP$ upstream$of$river$ properties$upstream$ []$Compensate$owners$of$ due$to$dam$ flooded$lands$ construction$ []$Change$dam$location$ $ [$]$Rise$in$water$level$ LProvide$protection$walls$on$ []DED/POW$ could$erode$portions$of$ susceptible$portions$of$ the$banks$upstream$ riverbanks$ ….$ [$]$No$flooding$or$ $ $ flooding$or$rise$in$water$ level$not$significant$ 18.$River$bank$ [$]$Dam$or$other$intake$ [$]$Provide$river$bank$ [$]$DED$and$POW$ scouring/erosion$ structure$change$the$ protection$downstream$ due$to$altered$ direction$of$river$flow$ direction$of$river$ causing$downstream$ flow$ erosion$of$river$banks$ and$land$ $ [$]$Dam$or$intake$ $ $ structures$do$not$alter$ direction$of$water$flow$ or$cause$erosion$ downstream$ 19.$Potential$ [$]$The$river$does$dry$up$ $[$]$Redesign$irrigation$ [$]DED/POW$ changes$in$ during$dry$season$or$ system$such$that$drying$up$ $ downstream$ there$is$no$history/$ of$downstream$is$prevented$ $ ecology$due$ record$of$drying$up$but$ [$]$Strictly$implement$water$ $ reduction$in$river$ irrigation$system$design$ use$policy$designed$to$avoid$ $ water$flow$ may$cause$downstream$ serious$ecological$damage$ [$]$O&M$Plan$ to$dry$up;$ [$]$Monitor$ecological$ $ changes$downstream$ [$]$Presence$of$ ecologically$important$ species$downstream$ $ [$]$Irrigation$system$ [$]$Monitor$ecological$ [$]$O&M$Plan$ draws$more$than$30%$of$ changes$downstream$ river$water$and$there$is$ $ possibility$of$significant$ ecological$changes$ Issue)(Potential) Assessment)(Sample) Mitigation)Measure) Instrument)of) Impact)) assessments)) Implementation) (POW,)Contract,)IDP,)) or)O&M)Plan)*) downstream$ $ [$]$Irrigation$system$uses$ [$]$None$ $ less$than$30%$of$river$ $ water$ 20.$Potential$ [$]$Provide$adequate$ [$]$Irrigated$lands$may$ [$]$O&M$Plan$ deterioration$of$ be$permanently$flooded$irrigation$water$control$(or$ [$]$IA$capacity$building$ soil$quality$(i.e.$ with$irrigation$water,$turnouts)$at$the$farm;$ plan$$ increased$acidity)$ provide$adequate$drainage$ causing$increased$in$pH,$ of$rice$fields$due$ anaerobic$ and$conduct$occasional$ to$permanent$$ decomposition/methane$ draining$of$farms$ flooding$$with$ production,$etc.$ irrigation$water$ *IMO$is$NIA’s$Irrigation$Management$Office$in$charge$of$the$CIS$ $ Prepared$by:$$ ___________________________$ $ Adopted$by$MPMIU:$ $ _________________________________$ $ MPMIU$Head$ $ Noted$by$the$Irrigators$Association:$ $! $ $ _________________________________$ $ Irrigators$Association$President$ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Annex%F% % Republic%of%the%Philippines% Department%of%Agriculture% Mindanao%Rural%Development%Project%–%Adaptable%Loan%Program%II% ENVIRONMENTAL%AND%SOCIAL%MANAGEMENT%PLAN%COMPLIANCE%MONITORING% % Component:%__________________!! ! ! ! Project%No.%____________% Name%of%Sub%Projects:%________________% % % Region:%_______________% Location%of%Sub%Projects%:%______________________% Status%of%Sub%Projects:%_________________% % % ISSUES% MITIGATION% STATUS%OF%MITIGATING% MEANS%OF% (POTENTIAL% MEASURES% MEASURES% VERIFICATIONS/REMARKS% IMPACT)% IMPLEMENTATION% Completed% On7Going% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Annex%G%–%Form%1% Survey No. ________ % Date of Survey _______________ Republic of the Philippines Department of Agriculture Mindanao Rural Development Program ! ENTITLEMENT%SURVEY%OF%DISPLACED%PERSONS% % Component: Proj. No.: Barangay: Municipality: Province: Region: Name of Number of Persons in Head of HH HH Total SQ. MTS Lot No. Pls. No. Landholding PROPERTIES TO BE AFFECTED BY THE QUANTITY REMARKS ENTITLEMENTS PROJECT A. LAND 1. Residential Sq. Mts. 2. Commercial Sq. Mts. 3. Agricultural Sq. Mts. B. CROPS (Specify) 1. Sq. Mts. 2. Sq. Mts. C. TREES (Specify Age) 1. Nos. 2. Nos. 3 Nos. D. STRUCTURES (Specify) 1. Permanent Sq. Mts. 2. Temporary Sq. Mts. 3. Tombs Nos. 4. Wells Nos. E. ECONOMIC LOSSES (Explain Briefly) 1. Business Lost 2. Income Loss 3. Temporary Losses F. OTHERS (Explain Briefly) 1. 2. G. SKETCH Survey Conducted by: ________________________ ___________________________ ________________________ Brgy. Representative Municipal Representative MRDP Representative CONFORME: ___________________________________ Name and Signature of HH Note: Attach DONATION PAPER or Affidavit of “Quit Claim“ in case the affected person shall not claim for any entitlement. $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Survey No. TOTAL Name of Head of Barangay: Component: Household No. of Persons in HH Total Landholding of Hhold in Sq. M. Land to be Acquired by Type in Sq. M. Land Type Loss as % of Total Paddy area in Sq. * Refer to Form No.1 (on file) as source of above data Meters Municipality: Fruit trees Lost Type Land and Crop Losses and Number No. & Type of lost structures % % Structures Permanent in Sq. M. Structures Temp.in Sq. M. Area of Residential Annex%G%–%Form%2% Republic of the Philippines Land Lost In Sq. M. Department of Agriculture Province: Structures Losses Residence (rented) Project Number: Mindanao Rural Development Program Temporary losses (Specify) Wells No. Tombs Number INVENTORY & ENTITLEMENT OF PROJECT AFFECTED PERSONS Business lost Region: Other Losses Income Lost Other (Specify) Total Entitlements in Pesos Annex%G%–%Form%3% % Republic of the Philippines Department of Agriculture Mindanao Rural Development Program SOCIO-ECONOMIC DATA SHEET OF DISPLACED PERSONS Component: Proj. No. Barangay: Municipality: Province: Region: Su Occupation Estimated rve ID No. Educ and Employ Total Name of Household Member Sex Age Ethnicity y of Hh ation sources of ment Income No. Income per Year Survey Conducted by : ________________________ ____________________ _______________________ Barangay Representative Municipal Representative MRDP Representative $ $ $ Annex%G%–%Form%4% Full$Resettlement$Plan$L$Outline$Example$ 1. SubLproject$ description$ (e.g.,$ municipal$ road$ link,$ communal$ irrigation$ system,$water$supply$system,$etc.)$$ $ 2. Avoidance$ or$ minimization$ of$ displacement$ and$ other$ adverse$ social$ impacts$(steps$taken$to$minimize$land$acquisition$by$modifying$designs$and$ other$approaches)$$ $ 3. Amount$of$land$acquisition$and$number$of$displaced$persons$and$vulnerable$ groups$$ $ 4. Full$inventory$(see$form$in$Attachment$1)$$ $ 5. SocioLeconomic$$survey$(sample$$respondents)$$of$$the$$project$$area$$and$$ the$$proposed$resettlement$site$(see$form$in$Attachment$3)$ $ 6. Consultation$and$participation$plan$$ $ 7. Entitlement$and$compensation$package$(see$form$in$Attachment$2)$ $ 8. Rehabilitation$and$income$restoration$measures$$ $ 9. Institutional$arrangements,$required$capacity$and$implementation$skills$ $ 10. Implementation$ plan$ and$ schedule$ (e.g.,$ what$ steps$ are$ taken$ to$ prepare$ for$ resettlement$ and/or$ paying$ compensation;$ when$ will$ it$ take$ place;$ how$will$it$be$coordinated$with$civil$works$of$subLproject;$etc)$$ $ 11. Training$ program$ (if$ appropriate,$ as$ part$ of$ rehabilitation$ measures$ for$ affected$people)$$ $ 12. Monitoring$(internal$and$external)$and$reporting$(refer$to$guidelines$in$Land$ Acquisition$and$Involuntary$Resettlement$Policy$Framework)$$ $ 13. Grievance$procedures$specific$to$subLproject$and$location$(see$guidelines$in$ Land$Acquisition$and$Involuntary$Resettlement$Policy$Framework)$ $ 14. Information$dissemination$plan$and$transparency$measures$$ $ 15. Budgeting$and$funding$source$$ $ $ Annex%G%–%Form%5% % Sample$Check$List$for$Land$Acquisition$Activities$for$PRDP) $ $ Activity$ Responsible$ $ Annual$Planning$by$Province/Municipality$for$Infrastructure:$ 1$ Prepare$list$of$proposed$roads$for$rehabilitation$ MPDO$ 2$ Submit$list$to$Municipal$MultiLSectoral$Committee$(MSC)$ MPDO$ 3$ Prioritize$proposed$roads$for$subLproject$ MSC$ 4$ Submit$list$to$PPMIU$ MPDO$ Inventory/Survey$For$Each$Subproject$with$Land$Acquisition:$ $ 1$ Give$public$notice$of$intention$to$acquire$land,$and$grievance$period$ MPDO$ 2$ Send$written$notification$to$displaced$persons$ MPDO$ 3$ Hold$public$meeting$with$Barangay$Officials$and$displaced$persons$ MPDO$ 4$ Conduct$onLsite$verification$of$assets$to$be$acquired$with$each$head$of$household$ MPDO/BDC$ 5$ Complete$Inventory$and$Entitlement$Forms$of$projected$affected$families$ MPDO/BDC$ 6$ Consult$with$displaced$persons$regarding$compensation$ MPDO/BDC$ 7$ Sign$Compensation$Protocol$by$authorities$and$head$of$household$ MPDO/BDC$ 8$ Submit$of$Inventory$&$Entitlement$Forms$to$PPMIU$ MPDO$ 9$ Submit$Inventory$&$Entitlement$Forms$to$PCO$and$World$Bank$for$approval$ PPMIU$ $ Under$PRDP,$submission$of$required$documents$will$follow$a$twoLstep$process$ similar$to$and$integrated$with$the$procurement$process$(refer$to$Operation$Manual):$$ Step$1$L$$Submit$all$completed$inventories$and$entitlement$forms$as$well$as$ $ documentation$on$consultation$$for$No$Objection$#1$$ Step$2$$$$Submit$all$duly$completed$deeds$of$donation$and$proof$of$satisfactory$ completion$of$resettlement$activities$(signed$Compensation$Protocol)$for$No$ Objection$#2$$ 10$ Review$and$determine$if$full$RAP$is$needed$(if$impacts$are$significant$where$people$ RPCO$ are$physically$displaced$and$more$than$10%$of$their$productive$assets$are$lost,$then$a$ full$RAP$is$required)$ $ 11$ If$full$RAP$not$required,$implement$compensation$activities$ MPDO/BDC$ Full$Resettlement$Action$Plan$(RAP):$ $ 12$ Undertake$socioLeconomic$survey$and$complete$form$ MPDO/BDC$ 13$ Prepare$full$RAP$(full$RAP$includes$Inventory,$Entitlement,$SocioLEconomic$Survey,$ MPDO/BDC$ Relocation$and$Compensation$Plans,$Schedules$and$Budget)$ 14$ Submit$full$RAP$to$RPCO$for$review$ PPDO$ 15$ Submit$full$RAP$and$RPCO$comments$to$DA$PSO$and$World$Bank$for$review$and$ RPCO$ approval$ 16$ Wait$for$No$Objection$from$DA$and$WB$for$full$RAP$(same$as$Step$1$in$#$9$above)$ DA,$World$Bank$ 17$ Implement$full$RAP$after$approval$from$DA$and$WB$(same$as$Step$2$in$#$9$above)$ MPDO$ $ $ $ Award)of)Contract)for)Civil)Works)) $ $ The$Bank$will$provide$“no$objectionâ€?$to$award$of$contract$only$after$all$activities$for$ $ land$acquisition,$compensation$and$resettlement$have$been$satisfactorily$$ completed.$$ Monitoring$$ $ 1$ OnLgoing$Internal$monitoring$and$reporting$ RPCO/PPMIU$ 2$ Hire$Independent$Monitoring$Agency$ PSO$ 3$ Start$external$monitoring$ External$Monitor$ 4$ Submit$external$monitoring$report$to$World$Bank$(annually)$ PSO$ $ !