Routine "quick-and-dirty" methods of project appraisal can be so dirty in guiding project selection as to wipe out the net social gains from public investment, contend the authors, illustrating their point with a case study of irrigation projects in Vietnam. They test a common quick-and-dirty method for estimating benefits from irrigation investments, using data for Vietnam. They compare the results with impacts assessed through econometric modeling...
See More

DETAILS

See More

DOWNLOADS

COMPLETE REPORT

Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)

Citation

van de Walle, Dominique; Gunewardena, Dileni.

How dirty are "quick and dirty" methods of project appraisal? (English). Policy, Research working paper ; no. WPS 1908 Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/847261468778478362

SUBSCRIBE TO EMAIL ALERTS

This document is being processed or is not available.