SFG2188 V1 FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA COMMUNITY AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (CSDP) ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP) For CONSTRUCTION OF 1 BLOCK OF 6 MARKET STALLS AT KUKUWA TASHA COMMUNITY IN GUJBA LGA OF YOBE STATE DRAFT FINAL REPORT May, 2016 CSDP-ESMP 2016 Table of Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 CHAPTER 1:INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 Background 5 1.2 CSDP Project Development Objectives and Components 5 1.3 Environmental Classification and Rationale for Preparing an Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) 6 1.4 Objectives of the ESMP 6 CHAPTER 2: MICRO PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS 7 2.1 Micro Project Description 7 2.2 Beneficial Impacts 7 2.3 Negative Impacts 7 2.4 Mitigation Measures 7 CHAPTER 3:POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 8 3.1 ESMP and Monitoring Matrix 8 3.2 Capacity Building Need and Targets 9 3.4 Summary of ESMP cost 10 REFERENCES 11 APPENDIX 1:ESMP CHECKLIST 12 APPENDIX 2: CSDP PROJECT CYCLE AND EA PROCESS 13 Page 2 CSDP-ESMP 2016 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AF Additional Financing GO Gender Officer BH Boko Haram GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism CBO Community Based Organization IDA International Development Association CDA Community Development IDPs Internally Displaced Persons Association CDD Community Driven Development LGA Local Government Area CPMC Community Project Management LGRC Local Government Review Committee Committee CSDA Community and Social M&E Monitoring & Evaluation Development Agency CSDP Community and Social OO Operation Officer Development Project EA Environmental Assessment OP Operational Policy EIA Environmental Impact Assessment PO Project officer ESMF Environmental and Social PRA Participatory Rural Appraisal Management Framework ESMP Environmental and Social RPBA Recovery and Peace Building Management Plan Assessment ESSF Environmental and Social Screening SA State Agency Form Page 3 CSDP-ESMP 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Kukuwa Tasha Community has identified the construction of 6 market stalls as a priority project in their community which they believe will help in the improvement of sanitation and hygiene and reduce the incidences of water borne diseases. The community seeks the assistance of CSDP to fund the project. Based on the environmental and social checklist screening carried out in the area, this micro project is classified as a category B project. The screening result shows that this micro project is envisaged to have minimal environmental and social impacts resulting from the construction activities and wastes. But these are site specific and limited in scope, and can be readily addressed through mitigation measures contained in this ESMP. Beneficial Impacts The beneficial impacts of this micro project are as follow:  Stimulation of economic activities and development  Employment for traders and shop attendants  Increase income and welfare 2.3 Negative Impacts The negative or adverse impacts of this micro project at the implementation stage are as follow:  Market stalls will result in increase in solid and liquid waste generation and air pollution of the surrounding environment  Poor waste management may result to public health crisis  There may be incessant traffic obstruction along the adjoining road due to the market  Activities of theft and burglary may increase especially, if they are open or unfenced shops/stalls  Fire incidence from the market may result to loss of life and property To mitigate the minimal adverse potential impacts, an ESMP is prepared which include impact, mitigations and monitoring measures, cost implications which are all in this document. Also, capacity need and training requirements and cost implications were prepared. The overall cost of implementing the ESMP is as follows: Cost Item Responsibility Cost Estimate in (USD) Estimate(N) Mitigation & CDA, CPMC, SA 520,000 750 Monitoring Training & Capacity Consultant 450,000 2250 Building Sub-Total 300,000 1500 Management (20%) SA 60,000 300 Contingency (10%) 30,000 150 Total 1,360,000 4,950 Page 4 CSDP-ESMP 2016 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background The Federal Government of Nigeria has received financing from the World Bank (WB) for implementing a 2-year World Bank Assisted Additional Financing (AF) of Community and Social Development Project (CSDP). The thrust of the Community and Social Development Project (CSDP) is to contribute to the realization of the Nigerian government’s strategy for poverty reduction by improving the welfare and living conditions of many poor and vulnerable communities in most states of Nigeria. The project has the objective to increase access by the poor to improved social and natural resources infrastructure services in a sustainable manner throughout Nigeria. This will be achieved through the provision of grant support to benefiting Communities for the implementation of community-driven micro projects under approved Community Development Plan (CDP). To commence State-level implementation of the additional financing, the Project intends to use part of the proceeds for consultancy services for the review/upgrade of Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) and prepare Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan (ARAP) for the participating States in the North East Geopolitical Zone. 1.2 CSDP Project Development Objectives and Components The initial consultation suggest that the Project Development Objective (PDO) for the CSDP AF will remain unchanged as the original PDO- “to sustainably increase access of poor people to social and natural resource infrastructure services�, but the key performance indicators (KPIs) will be revised. The CSDP AF KPIs will put some emphasis on support to vulnerable and disenfranchised household and individuals expand scope of assistance to such households beyond public goods (schools, health center, water etc.). It will also include demand side support i.e. a safety net. The use of a community managed approach and emphasis on local government active partnership with community groups will be retained and strengthened during CSDP AF period. The new emphasis on safety net will result in an additional component, for ‘vulnerable groups’ transfers, to the original design. In essence, the additional financing will now have 4 components:  Component 1: Coordination and Program Support Component (Federal and State Level)  Component 2: LGA/Sectoral Ministries Capacity and Partnership building Component  Component 3: Community-Driven Investment Component  Component 4: Vulnerable Groups livelihood investment grants/transfers component. Page 5 CSDP-ESMP 2016 1.3 Environmental Classification and Rationale for Preparing an Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) As part of the credit agreement with the World Bank, projects supported by Bank’s funding are usually subjected to safeguard screening to determine the environmental and social risk before approval. The environmental and social checklist screening carried out in the field is consistent with the ESMF classification of the CSDP micro-projects as a category B project. The screening result shows that this micro project is envisaged to have minimal environmental and social impacts resulting from the construction activities and wastes. But these are site specific and limited in scope, and can be readily addressed through mitigation measures This ESMP is therefore prepared to set out site specific mitigation, monitoring and institutional measures to be taken during implementation to eliminate adverse environmental and social impacts, offset them or reduce them to acceptable levels. 1.4 Objectives of the ESMP The main objective of this ESMP is to review and update the environmental and social checklist prepared for the micro-project and document the actions necessary to prevent or minimize predicted negative impacts of the sub-project during project implementation. Specifically, this ESMP is designed to ensure the following:  Identify potential impacts that may occur during implementation stage of the various project activities;  Develop detailed specific mitigation measures with relevant costs implication that will need to be achieved during and after sub-project implementation;  Specify responsibilities and institutional arrangement that will be put in place to ensure that the mitigation measures are implemented  Integrating environment fully into the various activities of the proposed project and ensuring inclusion of environmental requirements into tender documents, continuing management and evaluation of the environmental performance of the micro-project.  Providing detailed design criteria for specific mitigation measures to be implemented.  Tracking to ensure the effectiveness of the mitigation measures at meeting the discharge standards.  Provide implementation and monitoring schedule Page 6 CSDP-ESMP 2016 CHAPTER 2: MICRO PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS 2.1 Micro Project Description The Kukuwa Tasha community has selected the construction of 1 block of 6 Market Stalls as priority micro-projects which they are asking for the assistance of CSDP for funding. The market stall when constructed will boost economic activities and attract income to households. 2.2 Beneficial Impacts The beneficial impacts of this micro project are as follow:  Stimulation of economic activities and development  Employment for traders and shop attendants  Increase income and welfare 2.3 Negative Impacts The negative or adverse impacts of this micro project at the implementation stage are as follow:  Market stalls will result in increase in solid and liquid waste generation and air pollution of the surrounding environment  Poor waste management may result to public health crisis  There may be incessant traffic obstruction along the adjoining road due to the market  Activities of theft and burglary may increase especially, if they are open or unfenced shops/stalls  Fire incidence from the market may result to loss of life and property 2.4 Mitigation Measures Necessary and specific mitigation measures to the identified adverse impacts are described in the ESMP matrix that follows in the next section. Page 7 CHAPTER 3: POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN In line with the TOR, this ESMP is to mitigate the adverse impacts at the implementation/operation phase since construction activities have been completed. It details the identified impacts, mitigation measures, responsibility for implementation and cost amongst others. The sub-section after the ESMP matrix is the monitoring arrangement to ensure effective implementation and delivery of project development objectives. 3.1 ESMP and Monitoring Matrix OPERATIONAL PHASE Impact Mitigation measures Method of Performance indicator Responsibility Time Cost identification Monitoring frame estimate (N) Mitigation monitorin g Solid and liquid -Introduce and implement Site inspection -Evidence of waste bins CPMC, CPMC, SA Daily 150,000 waste generation effective waste management -Evidence of order in waste Market plan handling and disposal authorities, OO, PO Disease outbreak -Construct VIP toilets Community -Availability of sanitary CPMC, CPMC, Daily 100,000 may occur due to -Construct a borehole to survey materials Market SA, GO poor hygiene ensure water supply (soap, tissue paper, authorities, -Constitute a market disinfectant) OO, PO committee for sanitation and -Evidence of functional hygiene water supply -Sensitize on hygiene and sanitation Fire outbreak and -Training on fire fighting and Community -Number of persons CPMC, CPMC, SA Annually 50 000 risk of loss of life safety measure survey trained/evidence of training Market and property -Provide firefighting -Number of firefighting authorities, equipment equipment installed OO, PO -Provide fire assembling points and sensitize the market association Loss of asset/income -Fence the market (Life Survey -Evidence of fenced area CPMC, -During 150,000 due to theft Fencing) -Number of complaints Market constructio - Form a committee for -Minutes of meetings authorities, n Rotational Communal indicating agreements OO, PO -During CSDP-ESMP 2016 Policing operation Traffic obstruction -Provide locally improvised Site inspection -Number of speed breakers CPMC, -After 70, 000 speed breakers and road and evidence of road Market constructio signage signage authorities, n -Provide First Aid Kits -Availability of First Aid OO, PO -Annually Kits Total (Mitigation) 520,000 3.2 Capacity Building Need and Targets The ESMP would also include a detailed capacity building/training for staff of CSDP at the Federal level and for the 26 states. Here below is a breakdown of the proposed training and cost implications. Capacity Need Participants Subject Resource Person Duration Cost (N) Environmental and Social Management OO, PO, GO, M&E CSDP project cycle and WB Safeguards 1 day 150,000 in Micro Projects Environmental checklist Consultant process WB safeguard policies and guidelines GO, M&E Principles and Application of WB Safeguards 1 day 150,000 OP 4.01 and OP 4.12 Consultant Medical Waste Management, Sanitation OO, PO, Preparation and WB Safeguards 1 day 150,000 and Hygiene Implementation of Waste Consultant management Total (Capacity Building) 450,000 This cost is exclusive of cost of hall, and other logistics which shall be undertaken by the CSDP under management cost. Page 9 CSDP-ESMP 2016 3.4 Summary of ESMP cost Cost Item Responsibility Cost Estimate in (USD) Estimate(N) Mitigation & CDA, CPMC, SA 520,000 750 Monitoring Training & Capacity Consultant 450,000 2250 Building Sub-Total 300,000 1500 Management (20%) SA 60,000 300 Contingency (10%) 30,000 150 Total 1,360,000 4,950 Note: The budget for capacity building has been integrated into another ESMP report by the CSDA. Page 10 CSDP-ESMP 2016 REFERENCES  Environmental and Social Management Plan Framework for CSDP-AF (2014)  ESMP for the Construction of Alternative Bridge No 2 at Emene, Enugu (2012); RSDT Federal Ministry of Works, Nigeria  Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources (2003): Third National Fadama Development Project (Fadama III), Rural Infrastructure, Manual No. 4, August  IFC General Environmental Health and Safety Guidelines: Occupational Health and Safety  Lochner, P. (2005): Guideline for Environmental Management Plans. CSIR Report No ENV-S-C 2005-053 H. Republic of South Africa, Provincial Government of the Western Cape, Department of Environmental Affairs & Development Planning, Cape Town.  Ministry Of Agriculture And Animal Resources (Minagri) (2010): Environmental Management Plan (EMP) For Nyanza 23 Sub Project , Land Husbandry, Water Harvesting And Hillside Irrigation Project (LWH) Prepared by Green and Clean Solution Ltd  Project Appraisal Document (PAD) for CSDP-AF  Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook (World Bank Group) 1998  Resettlement Policy Framework for CSDP-AF, (2014)  UNEP (1988): Environmental Impact Assessment, Basic procedures for developing Countries. Page 11 CSDP-ESMP 2016 APPENDIX 1: ESMP CHECKLIST S/n Description Response/Yes No 1 Name of District 2 Is the site close to a. Market b. School c. Hospital d. Residence e. Government institution f. Surface water 3 What is the distance of the site to settlement/economic activity area 4 Type of settlement in the area 5 Are there economic activities within the corridor? 6 Will construction work affect the movement of road users? 7 Will it cause a slowdown of traffic flow? 8 Will bridge construction result to public accident? 9 Will bridge construction result to occupational hazard? 10 Will there be waste management concerns during construction stage 11 Will there be involuntary displacement of persons 12 Soil: Is the project leading to changes in soil characteristics within the project area 13 During operation, are pedestrians likely to voluntarily use the pedestrian bridge? 14 Are there social menaces to worry about during operation (eg robbery during night hours)? 15 Are there going to be vulnerability concerns (women, disables) that need to be addressed? 16 Will the sitting of the bridge bring about trading activities and clustering in the vicinity? 17 If yes to question #16: a. Will this affect/increase social menace in the area? b. Will it lead to poor/bad traffic condition within the arena? c. Will it lead to waste littering on the bridge and around the area? Page 12 CSDP-ESMP 2016 APPENDIX 2: CSDP PROJECT CYCLE AND EA PROCESS STANDARD EA PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT CYCLE PLAN FOR CSDP IMPACT ASSESSMENT STAGES STAGES Information Campaign by Screening Project concept the Agency/LGA Cons ESSF & Environmental Checklist ESSF ult & Stak Envtal Community defines needs OO assists in ehold CDP for review & re-submission Develops and submits CDP Checklist CDP design ers to LGRC Pre-feasibility study Scoping Environmental Scoping Checklist Desk Appraisal by LGDO Community revises request in line using checklist with reviews from LGRC Envtal Scoping Checklist & Pre-Appraisal Envtal Checklist Envtal Checklist Environmental and Social Impact Feasibility study Assessment LGRMC Reviews and CDP rejected and returned recommends to Agency to CPMC Agency/LGA Ministry joint CDP field appraisal Environmental & Social Management Plan/Resettlement Action Plan Contract signing/Documentation Agency Approves CDP CPMC Training EMP Checklist Inspections and compliance Monitoring Construction Supervision Project Launch trenches releases Agency (Community/Agency sign M&E funding agreement CPMC CSDA Environmental Management System Commissioning LGRC State Line ministries FPSU World Bank Community implements CDP Auditing and Monitoring Operations Subsequent Trenches released Envtal Project Completion Audit Checklist Closure Plans and Rehabilitation Checklist Decommissioning & Post Completion Joint Closure Evaluation EAR THG UAR DS Source: CSDP Environmental Checklist Training by Earthguards Consult (2009) Page 13 CSDP-ESMP 2016 Page 14